korean
stringlengths
1
6.76k
english
stringlengths
1
14.4k
이λ₯Όν…Œλ©΄ ν•™κ΅λŠ” μ‚¬νšŒν™”μ™€ κ°œμ„±ν™”λΌλŠ” 이율배반적인 과정이 κ³΅μ‘΄ν•˜λŠ” κ³΅κ°„μ΄λ©΄μ„œ, λ…μžμ μΈ 평가 및 μ„ λ°œμ²΄μ œλ₯Ό 톡해 μ‚¬νšŒμ  인정 투쟁이 κ°€μž₯ μ›μ΄ˆμ μΈ λ°©μ‹μœΌλ‘œ μž‘λ™λ˜λŠ” λ…νŠΉν•œ 곡간이닀.
For example, schools are a unique space, where socialization and individualization coexist, and social recognition struggles are operated in the most primitive way through independent evaluation and selection systems.
그에 λ”°λ₯΄λ©΄ κ΅μœ‘μ€ κΈ°κ΄€μœΌλ‘œμ„œ 학ꡐ ν˜Ήμ€ ꡐ사 주체가 μ˜μ‹μ μœΌλ‘œλ“  λ¬΄μ˜μ‹μ μœΌλ‘œλ“ μ§€ ν•™μƒμ—κ²Œ 곡포, 곡격성, 행동μž₯μ• , 성격 변화에 μ‹¬λŒ€ν•œ κ²°κ³Όλ₯Ό 낳을 μˆ˜λ°–μ— μ—†λ‹€κ³  μ£Όμž₯ν•œλ‹€.
According to Holkheimer's argument, educational institutions and the teaching staff, whether consciously or unconsciously, are bound to induce fear, aggression, behavioral disorder and personality change in students.
μ„œμ—΄ν™”λœ λŒ€ν•™μ²΄μ œμ™€ 그에 μžμ—°μŠ€λŸ½κ²Œ λŒ€μ‘ν•΄ μžˆλŠ” λ…Έλ™μ‹œμž₯의 ꡬ쑰둜 인 ν•΄ λΆ€λͺ¨λ‘œμ„œ 학ꡐ ꡐ윑 이외에 μžλ…€μ˜ 미래λ₯Ό 보μž₯해쀄 수 μžˆλŠ” β€˜μ„ νƒμ§€β€™λŠ” 쒁을 μˆ˜λ°–μ— μ—†λ‹€.
Due to the hierarchical university system and the labor market structure that naturally corresponds to it, parents have a narrow number of "choices" that can guarantee their children's future other than school education.
뿐만 μ•„λ‹ˆλΌ λŒ€ν•™μ€ μž¬μ •μ  μ••λ°•μœΌλ‘œ 인해 κΈ°μ—…κ³Ό 정뢀에 μ„œλΉ„μŠ€λ₯Ό νŒλ§€ν•¨μœΌλ‘œμ¨, κ΅μˆ˜λ“€μ€ 연ꡬ κ²°κ³Όλ₯Ό νŒλ§€ν•˜λ©΄μ„œ λŒ€ν•™μ€ μ‹œμž₯μ—μ„œ 적극적 ν–‰μœ„μžκ°€ λ˜λŠ” λ°©ν–₯으둜 μ²˜μ‹ ν•˜κ²Œ 된 것이닀.
Moreover, universities act actively in the marketplace by selling services to companies and governments under financial pressure, professors sell their research results.
이렇듯 ν•œκ΅­μ˜ κ΅μœ‘ν•™μ€ ν˜„μ‹€μ— λŒ€ν•œ λΉ„νŒμ  νƒœλ„λ₯Ό κ²°μ—¬ν•˜κ³  있으며, μ—°κ΅¬μž μžμ‹ λ„ μžκΈ°μ˜μ‹μ— μŠ€λ©°λ“  이데올둜기적 침전에 λŒ€ν•΄μ„œλ„ μΉ¨λ¬΅ν•˜κ³  ꡐ윑 변화에 λŒ€ν•œ μ˜μ§€λ„ κ²°μ—¬λ˜μ–΄ μžˆλ‹€.
Korean pedagogy lacks critical attitude toward reality, and researchers themselves are silent about intense the ideologies they have and lack the will to change education.
ν•˜μ§€λ§Œ 고전적 λΉ„νŒμ΄λ‘ μ΄ μ†Œν™€νžˆ ν•œ λŒ€μ•ˆμ  전망과 λ‹€μ†Œ μˆœν™˜λ‘ μ— κ°€κΉκ²Œ λ³΄μ΄λŠ” β€˜μ§€λ£¨ν•œ λΆ€μ •μ˜ 뢀정’ νƒœλ„λŠ” κ΅μœ‘λ³‘λ¦¬μ— λŒ€ν•œ 해결책을 μ œμ‹œν•˜λŠ” 데 λ§Œμ‘±μŠ€λŸ¬μ›Œ 보이지 μ•ŠλŠ”λ‹€.
However, the alternative outlook neglected by classical criticism theory and the "boring denial of denial" attitude, which seems to be close to cyclical theory, do not seem to be contempt with presenting a solution to educational pathology.
이와 같이 ν˜Έλ„€νŠΈμ˜ μΈμ •νˆ¬μŸ κ°œλ…μ€ 우리의 학ꡐ 곡동체가 μ–΄λ– ν•œ μ μ—μ„œ μ‚¬νšŒμ  κ·œλ²”μ˜ ν† λŒ€λ₯Ό μƒμ‹€ν•˜κ³  μžˆλŠ”μ§€λ₯Ό λΆ„μ„ν•˜λŠ” 데 μœ μš©ν•œ λΉ„νŒμ  μ€€κ±°κ°€ 될 수 μžˆλ‹€.
Thus, Hornet's concept of struggle for recognition can be a useful critical compliance to analyze in what ways our school community has lost its foundations of social norms.
ꡬ체적으둜 μ§€μ ν•˜μžλ©΄, μ‚¬κ΅μœ‘λΉ„ 증가 및 κ·Έκ²ƒμ˜ 계측 κ°„ κ²©μ°¨λŠ” ꡐ윑 λΆˆν‰λ“±μ„ κ³ μ°©ν™”ν•˜λŠ” ꡐ윑 문제λ₯Ό μ΄ˆλž˜ν•  뿐만 μ•„λ‹ˆλΌ, μΆœμ‚°μœ¨ μ €ν•˜μ™€ ν—ˆμˆ ν•œ λ…Έν›„λŒ€μ±…μ„ λ‚³λŠ” μ‚¬νšŒλ¬Έμ œμ΄κΈ°λ„ ν•˜λ‹€.
Specifically, the increase in private education costs and the disparity between classes not only lead to permanent educational inequality issues, but also social problems leading to lower fertility rates and poor old age care services.
즉 ꡐ윑 ν˜„μž₯이 μ •μΉ˜μ  이념 λŒ€λ¦½μ˜ μž₯으둜 μžλ¦¬λ§€κΉ€ν•˜κ³  μžˆλŠ” ν˜„μ‹€μ΄ 그것인데, 우리 μ‚¬νšŒμ˜ 각 μ •νŒŒλ₯Ό λŒ€λ³€ν•˜λŠ” ꡐ원쑰직이 ν•™κ΅μ—μ„œ λŒ€λ¦¬μ „μ„ 치λ₯΄κ³  μžˆλ‹€κ³  해도 과언이 μ•„λ‹ˆλ‹€.
In other words, the educational field has become a place of political ideological conflict, but it is no exaggeration to say that teachers' organizations representing political factions in our society are engaged in a proxy war at schools.
μ΄λŸ¬ν•œ μ •μΉ˜μ  λŒ€λ¦½ κ΅¬λ„λ‘œ 인해 각쒅 ꡐ윑 비리와 같은 전톡적인 μΈμŠ΅λ“€μ΄ ν™œκ°œλ₯Ό μΉ˜λŠ” 상황이 μ‘°μ„±λ˜κ³  μžˆμ–΄μ„œ ꡐ윑의 λ³Έμ§ˆμ— μ˜κ±°ν•œ 학ꡐ 운영이 λΆˆκ°€λŠ₯ν•œ 정도이닀.
This political confrontation creates a situation where traditions such as educational corruption are rampant, making it impossible to operate schools based on the nature of education.
μ‚¬νšŒλ¬Έν™”μ , 역사적 근원을 μ§€λ‹Œ ꡐ윑 문제라면 μž₯기적인 좔세뢄석에 μž…κ°ν•œ 정책적 접근이 ν•„μš”ν•˜μ§€λ§Œ, μ‚¬μ•ˆλ³„ one-point 식 μ •μ±…κ°œλ°œμ΄λ‚˜ 단기적인 μ²˜λ°©μœ„μ£Όμ˜ 정책이 주둜 μ‹œν–‰λ˜μ—ˆλ‹€κ³  ν•  수 μžˆλ‹€.
For educational issues with sociocultural and historical roots, a policy approach based on long-term trend analysis is necessary. However, one-point policy development and short-term prescription-oriented policies were mainly implemented.
ν•΄λ°© 이후 미ꡭ식 ꡐ윑λͺ¨λΈμ˜ μ΄μ‹μœΌλ‘œ 인해 μžμ—°μŠ€λŸ½κ²Œ λ―Έκ΅­ λŒ€ν•™μ—μ„œ ν›ˆλ ¨λ°›μ€ κ΅μœ‘ν•™μžλ“€μ΄ ν•œκ΅­ κ΅μœ‘ν•™μ˜ μ£Όλ₯˜λ₯Ό ν˜•μ„±ν•˜λ©΄μ„œ ν•œκ΅­ κ΅μœ‘ν•™μ΄ λ―Έκ΅­ κ΅μœ‘ν•™μ˜ λ³€ν™”, λ°œμ „ 과정에 μ’…μ†λ˜κΈ°μ— 이λ₯΄λ €λ‹€.
After the Liberation, American-style educational models were used in Korean pedagogy, so Korean pedagogy naturally became subordinate to the change and development process of American pedagogy.
여기에 μ‹€λ¦° μ£Όμš”ν•œ 생각은 1968λ…„ γ€Žκ΅μœ‘κ³Ό κ΅μœ‘ν•™γ€μœΌλ‘œ μ§‘λŒ€μ„±λ˜μ—ˆλŠ”λ°, μ΄ν™μš°μ˜ ν‰κ°€λŒ€λ‘œ μ •λ²”λͺ¨μ˜ β€˜κ΅μœ‘μ˜ 곡학적 κ°œλ…β€™μ€ λ―Έκ΅­ κ΅μœ‘ν•™λ³΄λ‹€λ„ 훨씬 더 κ΅μœ‘ν•™μ„ 싀증적 κ³Όν•™μœΌλ‘œ μ •λ¦½ν•˜κ³ μž ν•œ 것이닀.
The main ideas were compiled in "Education and Education" (1968), but as Lee Hong-woo (1991) evaluated, Jeong Beom-mo's "Engineering Concept of Education" tried to establish pedagogy as a far more empirical science than American pedagogy.
λ¨Όμ € 곡동체 λ‚΄ κ΅¬μ„±μ›λ“€μ˜ μ •μ„œμ  μš•κ΅¬μ— ν•΄λ‹Ήν•˜λŠ” μ‚¬λž‘, 법적 ꢌ리의 λ™λ“±ν•œ 인정, λ§ˆμ§€λ§‰μœΌλ‘œ 개인이 μ†Œμ† 집단에 λŒ€ν•΄ κ°€μ§€λŠ” λ…νŠΉν•œ 속성인 μ‚¬νšŒμ  μ—°λŒ€κ°€ 그것이닀.
Firstly, these are love (Liebe), which corresponds to the emotional needs of the members of the community, the equivalent recognition of legal rights (Recht), and finally - social bond (Solidarit Γ€ t) - a unique quality of each individual in a group.
μ—¬κΈ°μ„œ μΈμ •νˆ¬μŸ κ°œλ…μ„ 톡해 학ꡐλ₯Ό λΉ„νŒν•˜λŠ” μ ‘κ·Ό 방식이 κ°€μ§€λŠ” μ΅œλŒ€ 강점은, ν•™μƒλ“€μ˜ μ‹€μ œ μ‚΄μ•„κ°€λŠ” μ‚Άμ˜ κ³΅κ°„μœΌλ‘œμ„œ ν•™κ΅μ˜ 내적인 과정을 μ •ν™•νžˆ μ΄ν•΄ν•˜κ²Œλ” ν•œλ‹€λŠ” 데 μžˆλ‹€.
The biggest strength of the approach to criticizing schools through the concept of struggle for recognition is to accurately understand the internal process of the school as a real living space for students.
μ„œκ΅¬μ‚¬νšŒμ— κΈ°λ°˜μ„ λ‘” μ‚¬νšŒμ΄λ™μ— κ΄€ν•œ λ‹€μ–‘ν•œ 이둠듀이 1980λ…„λŒ€κΉŒμ§€λ§Œ 해도 ν•œκ΅­ μ‚¬νšŒμ— 적용이 λΆˆκ°€λŠ₯ν–ˆλ‹€λŠ” 사싀은, μ΄λŸ¬ν•œ 이둠을 ν•œκ΅­μ— μ†Œκ°œν•œ λ‹Ήμ‹œ β€˜μ§„λ³΄μ μΈβ€™ κ΅μœ‘ν•™μžλ“€μ„ λ‹€μ†Œ λ‹Ήν˜ΉμŠ€λŸ½κ²Œ ν–ˆλ‹€.
The fact that various theories on social mobility based on Western society were not applicable to Korean society until the 1980s somewhat perplexed the "progressive" educators who introduced these theories to Korea.
1990λ…„λŒ€ ν¬λ―Έν•˜κ²Œλ‚˜λ§ˆ 학ꡐ ꡐ윑과 μ‚¬νšŒμ  λΆˆν‰λ“±μ˜ κ΄€κ³„μ—μ„œ λ³€ν™”κ°€ κ°μ§€λ˜κΈ° μ‹œμž‘ν–ˆκ³ , 2000λ…„λŒ€ 이후 우리 μ‚¬νšŒμ—μ„œ 학ꡐ ꡐ윑이 κ³„μΈ΅μž¬μƒμ‚°μ— κΈ°μ—¬ν•˜κ³  μžˆλ‹€λŠ” 적지 μ•Šμ€ 연ꡬ 결과듀이 λ“±μž₯ν–ˆλ‹€.
In the 1990s, changes began to be observed due to the relationship between school education and social inequality. Since the 2000s, there have been many studies showing that school education has contributed to social reproduction in our society.
λΆ€λͺ¨μ˜ μ‚¬νšŒκ²½μ œμ  μ§€μœ„λΌλŠ” λ‹¨μˆœν•œ λ°°κ²½ μš”μΈλ³΄λ‹€ λΆ€λͺ¨-μžμ‹ μ‚¬μ΄μ˜ 심리적 관계에 μ£Όλͺ©ν•΄μ„œ ν”νžˆ β€˜μœ„μŠ€μ½˜ μ‹  μ‚¬νšŒμ‹¬λ¦¬λͺ¨ν˜•’이라고 λΆˆλ¦¬λŠ” 이 이둠은 λ‹€λΆ„νžˆ λ―Έκ΅­ 쀑산측 가정을 λͺ¨λΈλ‘œ ν•˜κ³  μžˆλ‹€.
Often referred to as the β€œWisconsin social psychological model,” which focuses more on the psychological relationship between parents and children than on the simple background of their parents' socioeconomic status, the theory is largely modeled after the middle class families in the United States.
이와 달리 자본주의 μ‚¬νšŒμ—μ„œμ˜ ν•œκ΅­κ΅μœ‘μ˜ 병리학에 λŒ€ν•œ λΉ„νŒμ  접근은 μ‚¬νšŒκ΅¬μ‘°μ  동인, 그것이 λ°°νƒœν•œ 이데올둜기적 차원 그리고 이해관계λ₯Ό λ‘˜λŸ¬μ‹Ό νŠΉμ •ν•œ μ‚¬νšŒμ§‘λ‹¨μ˜ μš•λ§ ꡬ쑰 λͺ¨λ‘λ₯Ό ν¬κ΄„ν•΄μ•Όλ§Œ ν•œλ‹€.
On the other hand, the critical approach to the pathology of Korean education in a capitalist society must cover all the social structural motivations, the ideological dimensions of which it was conceived, and the desire structure of a particular social group, over interests.
ν•œκ΅­ κ΅μœ‘λ³‘μ˜ μ§•ν›„λ₯Ό λ³΄μ—¬μ£ΌλŠ” μ‚¬νšŒμ  ν˜„μƒνƒœλ‘œμ„œ κ΅μœ‘μ—΄μ΄ 학ꡐ ꡐ윑뿐만 μ•„λ‹ˆλΌ ꡐ윑 자체λ₯Ό λ„κ΅¬λ‘œ κ°„μ£Όν•˜λŠ” μ™œκ³‘λœ ꡐ윑 ν–‰λ™μ˜ 성격을 띠고 μžˆλ‹€λŠ” μ μ—μ„œ μ‚¬νšŒ κ·œλ²”μ  λ¬Έμ œλ„ μ§€λ‹ˆκ³  μžˆλ‹€.
The Korean β€œeducation fever” is a current social phenomenon showing signs of being a social disease. There is also a social norm problem in that the passion for education is a distorted educational behavior, which affects not only schools, but the whole education system.
μ΄λŸ¬ν•œ λ³€λͺ¨ 과정은 λ―Έκ΅­ λŒ€ν•™λ“€μ΄ λ³€ν™”ν•˜λŠ” μ„Έκ³„μ§ˆμ„œμ— λŠ₯λ™μ μœΌλ‘œ μ μ‘ν•œ κ²°κ³Όκ°€ μ•„λ‹ˆλΌ, 였히렀 β€œμ„Έκ³„μ²΄μ œμ˜ ꡬ쑰적 μœ„κΈ°μ™€ λ³‘ν–‰ν•˜λŠ” κ²ƒβ€μ΄λ©΄μ„œ λ™μ‹œμ— 미래 μ§„λ‘œμ— λŒ€ν•œ μ‹¬κ°ν•œ λΆˆμ•ˆμ„ λ°˜μ˜ν•œλ‹€.
This transformation process is not the result of American universities' active adaptation to the changing world order, but rather "parallel to the structural crisis of the world system" (same place, 65) and also reflects serious anxiety about the future course.
β€œμ„Έκ³„ λŒ€ν•™ μ œλ„μ˜ 기본적인 λ¬Έμ œλŠ” κ·Έ 규λͺ¨μ™€ λΉ„μš©μ΄ κΈ°ν•˜κΈ‰μˆ˜μ μœΌλ‘œ μ¦κ°€ν•˜λŠ” 데 λ°˜ν•΄μ„œ, λŒ€ν•™μ˜ μ‚¬νšŒκ²½μ œμ  ν† λŒ€λŠ” μž₯기적으둜 μΉ¨μ²΄ν•˜κ³  μžˆλŠ” 세계경 제둜 인해 λ”μš± μ•½ν™”λ˜κ³  μžˆμ—ˆλ‹€λŠ” 데에 μžˆλ‹€.
The fundamental problem with the global university system is that its socioeconomic foundation was further weakened by the long-term stagnation of the global economy, while its scale and cost increased exponentially.
ν˜„μž¬ 쀑증에 λ„λ‹¬ν•œ κ΅μœ‘λ³‘μ„ λ§ˆμ£Όν•œ μƒν™©μ—μ„œ κ΅μœ‘ν•™μ˜ 싀증주 의적 편ν–₯에 λŒ€ν•΄ λΉ„νŒν•  λ•Œ, 1960λ…„λŒ€ ν›„λ°˜μ²˜λŸΌ 단지 β€˜ν•΄μ„ν•™μ β€™ 관점에 μž…κ°ν•˜μ—¬ λŒ€μ•ˆμ„ μ œμ‹œν•˜λŠ” 것은 도움이 λ˜μ§€ μ•ŠλŠ”λ‹€.
When criticizing the positivist bias in pedagogy in the face of the current serious educational disease, it is not helpful to offer alternatives based on the "hermeneutics" perspective as it was in the late 1960s.
κ·Έλž˜μ„œμΈμ§€ ν•™μŠ΅μž₯μ• , 학ꡐ뢀적응, 학ꡐ ꡐ윑의 μ—­κΈ°λŠ₯κ³Ό 같은 뢀정적인 츑면은 κ΅μœ‘ν•™μ˜ λ‹€μ†Œ 주변적인 탐ꡬ 뢄야에 머물러 μžˆλ“ κ°€ μ•„λ‹ˆλ©΄ 치유 및 진단 λΆ„μ•Όλ‘œ μ—­ν•  λΆ„λ‹΄ 되고 μžˆλ‹€.
Perhaps because of this, negative aspects such as learning disability, maladaptation to school, and adverse functions of schooling remain in the somewhat peripheral domain of exploration of pedagogy, or are divided into healing and diagnostic domains.
μ΄λŸ¬ν•œ μ΄μœ μ—μ„œ ꡐ윑 ν˜„μ‹€μ˜ λΆ€μž‘μš©μ΄λ‚˜ 병리적 츑면은 λ…Όλ¦¬μ μœΌλ‘œ μš°μ„ ν•˜λŠ” ꡐ윑의 κ°€μΉ˜ 및 λͺ©μ μ— μ˜κ±°ν•˜μ—¬ - λΉ„νŠΈκ²μŠˆνƒ€μΈμ˜ 철학을 μ‚¬νšŒμ² ν•™μ μœΌλ‘œ ν•΄μ„ν•˜λŠ” 윈치의 μš©μ–΄λ‘œ - β€œλ³€ μš©νƒœβ€μ— λΆˆκ³Όν•  뿐이닀.
For this reason, the side effects and pathological aspects of educational reality are merely "modification" in the term (Winch, 1958) interpreting Wittgenstein's philosophy in a socio-philosophical way based on the value and purpose of logically prioritized education.
유ꡐ μ „ν†΅μ˜ λ¬Έκ³Ό μž…μ‹ μ–‘λͺ…μ˜ κΉŠμ€ 상관관계가 μ‘΄μ†ν•˜κ³  μžˆλŠ” μ‚¬νšŒμ—μ„œ μš°λ¦¬λŠ” ν•΄λ°© 이후 κΈ‰μ†ν•œ 계측 이동과정을 κ²½ν—˜ν•˜λ©΄μ„œ 학ꡐ ꡐ윑이 μ§€μœ„ μƒμŠΉ 및 μœ μ§€μ˜ μ€‘μš”ν•œ λ§€κ°œμž„μ„ μ§‘λ‹¨μ μœΌλ‘œ μΈμ‹ν•˜κ²Œ λ˜μ—ˆλ‹€.
In a society where there is a deep correlation between literature and achieving fame and prestige in the Confucian tradition, we have experienced a rapid process of class movement since the liberation and collectively recognized that schooling is an important medium for rising and maintaining status.
μ™ˆλŸ¬μŠ€ν‹΄μ— λ”°λ₯΄λ©΄, μ΄λŸ¬ν•œ μœ„κΈ° μƒν™©μ—μ„œ λ‹€μ–‘ν•œ μ‚¬νšŒκ³Όν•™μ΄ λΆ„ν™”ν•˜κ²Œ 된 것이며, 각 λŒ€ν•™μ€ μ»€μ§€λŠ” 규λͺ¨μ™€ ν•¨κ»˜ μž¬μ • μ••λ°• μ†μ—μ„œ μ •λΆ€ 및 λ―Όκ°„ λΆ€λ¬ΈμœΌλ‘œλΆ€ν„°μ˜ μž¬μ •μ§€μ›μ— λ”μš± μ˜μ‘΄ν•˜κ²Œ λ˜μ—ˆλ‹€λŠ” 것이닀.
Wallerstein says various social sciences have been segmented in this crisis, and universities have become more dependent on government and private-sector financial support under the growing financial pressure.
μ™ˆλŸ¬μŠ€ν‹΄μ˜ 뢄석이 λ‹€μ†Œ κ±°μ‹œμ μΈ β€˜μ„Έκ³„μ²΄μ œμ˜ 변동 κ³Όμ •β€™μ—μ„œ λŒ€ν•™μ˜ λ³€λͺ¨μ— μ΄ˆμ μ„ λ§žμΆ”κ³  있긴 ν•˜μ§€λ§Œ, λ―Έκ΅­ λŒ€ν•™μ˜ ν•™μ œ 개편과 연ꡬ κ²½ ν–₯이 μ‹œμž₯의 영ν–₯λ ₯ ν•˜μ— μžˆλ‹€λŠ” μ€‘μš”ν•œ μ‹œμ‚¬μ μ„ μ œκ³΅ν•œλ‹€.
Although Wallerstein's analysis focuses on the transformation of universities in a somewhat macro process of changing the world system, it provides an important suggestion that the US university academic system reform and research trends are under market influence.
κ·Έ 원인을 λ²”μ£Όν™”ν•œλ‹€λ©΄, μ„ λ°œκΈ°κ΄€μœΌλ‘œμ„œ ν•™κ΅μ˜ 쑴재, μˆ¨κ²¨μ§„ κ΅μœ‘κ³Όμ •, ν•™κ΅μ˜ μ‚¬νšŒν™”λ‘œ μΈν•œ κ°œμ„±ν™”μ˜ μ™œκ³‘, 즉 μ†Œμ™Έν˜„μƒ, 인격적 μΈκ°„κ΄€κ³„μ˜ 문제, κ·Έ 밖에 ꡐ사와 학ꡐ μ™Έ μš”μΈ 등이 μžˆλ‹€λŠ” 것이닀.
The reasons for this are not only teachers and schools, but also factors such as the existence of schools as selected institutions, hidden curriculums (potential curriculums), distortion of individualization due to school socialization, alienation phenomenon, personal relationships, and others.
이λ₯Όν…Œλ©΄ 학생은 생물학적 λ°œλ‹¬κ³Όμ •μ—μ„œ μ›μ΄ˆμ μΈ μ •μ„œμ  μš•κ΅¬λ‘œμ„œ λΆ€λͺ¨μ™€μ˜ μ‚¬λž‘μ— μž…κ°ν•œ 인정 관계λ₯Ό ν˜•μ„±ν•˜μ§€λ§Œ, 점차 ν•™κ΅μƒν™œμ„ μ‹œμž‘ν•˜λ©΄μ„œ 또래 μΉœκ΅¬μ™€ 및 κ΅μ‚¬μ™€μ˜ κ΄€κ³„μ—μ„œ 제2차적 μ •μ„œ 관계λ₯Ό 맺게 λœλ‹€.
For example, students develop a love-based human relationship with their parents (especially their mothers) as a fundamental emotional need during their biological development, but gradually they start school and develop a secondary emotional relationship with their peers and teachers.
18μ„ΈκΈ° ν›„λ°˜ λ£¨μ†Œκ°€γ€Žν•™μ˜ˆλ‘ γ€μ—μ„œ ν–ˆλ˜ λ¬Έλͺ…λΉ„νŒμ˜ 방식이 ν•œκ΅­κ΅μœ‘μ˜ 병리에 λŒ€ν•œ μ ‘κ·Όλ°© μ‹μ˜ 고전적 μ‹œλ„μΌ μˆ˜λ„ μžˆμ§€λ§Œ, μ΄λŠ” λ‹€μ†Œ 문학적이며 μœ ν† ν”Όμ•„μ  이상을 ν† λŒ€λ‘œ ν˜„μ‹œλŒ€μ˜ 뢀쑰리λ₯Ό λΉ„νŒν•˜λŠ” 데 κ·ΈμΉ  μˆ˜λ„ μžˆλ‹€.
Although Rousseau's civilizational criticism in β€œDiscours sur les sciences et les arts” in the late 18th century may be a classic attempt at approaching the pathology of Korean education, but it could stop at criticizing modern absurdity based on some literary and utopian ideals.
λ§ν•˜μžλ©΄ 전톡 이둠은 ν˜„μ‹€ 및 μ‹€μž¬μ— λŒ€ν•œ λ™μ–΄λ°˜λ³΅μ  접근에 λ¨Έλ¬Όκ³  있기 λ•Œλ¬Έμ— 발견된 법칙에 λŒ€ν•΄ μ΄ˆμ—­μ‚¬μ μΈ 착각을 ν•¨μœΌλ‘œμ¨ 이둠적 탐ꡬ가 μ΄λ£¨μ–΄μ§€λŠ” μ‚¬νšŒμ  쑰건에 λŒ€ν•΄μ„œλŠ” 주의λ₯Ό κΈ°μšΈμ΄μ§€ μ•ŠλŠ”λ‹€.
Since traditional theory remains a tautological approach to reality and existence, we pay no attention to the social conditions under which theoretical exploration is carried out by making a superhistorical illusion of the laws found.