comment
stringlengths 1
9.86k
| context
listlengths 0
530
|
|---|---|
>
|
[
"Lock 'em up, SANCTION and DISBAR them!",
">\n\nSounds like divisive malarkey, Jack. Why not give them another chance for the sake of unity and healing? /s",
">\n\n\"Water under the bridge!\"",
">\n\n\"That's so boring!\"",
">\n\nHow about we start with actual criminal charges being filed against Trump and go from there.",
">\n\nHow about we let the investigations finish. We just learned today that Mark Meadows was burning documents. I don't understand why people think they know enough about what's going on. Do you want him arrested, or do you want him prosecuted and found guilty?",
">\n\nThat is not how it works. Every charge is separate. You don't have to wait for everything to be complete, you can charge him with what is know now and charge him with the rest later.\nAlso there are multiple jurisdictions, different investigations and both state and federal charges..",
">\n\n\nYou don’t have to wait for everything to be complete\n\nI never said that. I said we should let the investigations finish. If they were to bring charges they would. I was trying to explain that we are actually in no position to know what they're investigating, let alone whether or not they're ready to file any charges.",
">\n\nExcept...... tick-tock, you know? The longer they stand around with their thumbs up their asses, the bolder the wolves become. They have to charge him or democracy is over....and they have do it now. And they have to go after all the government officials who were involved. Very soon it will be too late. The Nazis are practicing blowing up power stations for fucks sake.",
">\n\nLet's concentrate on the star of the show for now. The supporting actors time in the soptlight can come later.",
">\n\nExcept that the investigators are going to want to pressure the supporting actors to testify against the star of the show.",
">\n\nAnd no one is more damaging to their boss as a lawyer flipped.",
">\n\nAlex Jones’ lawyer enters the chat",
">\n\nGoing to be some Trump lawyers looking for work after this.",
">\n\n'should', 'could', 'may', 'might'....getting real tired of the baiting nature of headlines. The DOJ 'should' have been doing something over two years ago, no way the wheels of justice move this slow for an average person. For people with money and power they seemingly grind to a halt.",
">\n\nThe DOJ has been conducting the most massive and widespread investigation in DOJ for the past 2 years. They already have Giuliani's phone and other Trump lawyer communications.",
">\n\nDoes everything have to be one giant package, or can we treat all the crimes separate?\nCause he's on tape, multiple times, admitting to stealing documents.",
">\n\nThey will bring charges when they have a case that can win. None of us know what's going on or what information and evidence they have. \n\nCause he’s on tape, multiple times, admitting to stealing documents.\n\nIt's so, so much more than this. The DOJ has one chance. Period. This is the biggest investigation in the history of the country. We're going to have to wait. 🤷🏻♀️",
">\n\nIt's still disheartening to watch this happen as slowly as it is. I get that they want to have as airtight case as possible for everything, but fucking do something about at least one case.\nHe stole documents, his businesses dodged taxes, he incited a riot to try and topple the government, and literally nothing seems to happen. Like, Jesus fucking Christ, this country deserves to fall if this is how things are gonna be.",
">\n\nIn the thumbnail, that’s a green screen behind him, right? Or that’s a really big couch.\nAlso, I love his old man-esque Logitech headset. Clearly this man is a great lawyer and totally not a corrupt stooge"
] |
Laptop bros unite!
|
[] |
>
More info in the key caps? Love them!
|
[
"Laptop bros unite!"
] |
>
Thanks!
|
[
"Laptop bros unite!",
">\n\nMore info in the key caps? Love them!"
] |
>
Keyboard is a GAS67, Oil King switches, TX stabbies, and SA keycaps from Amazon. I love it.
|
[
"Laptop bros unite!",
">\n\nMore info in the key caps? Love them!",
">\n\nThanks!"
] |
>
Laptop bros unite!
|
[
"Laptop bros unite!",
">\n\nMore info in the key caps? Love them!",
">\n\nThanks!",
">\n\nKeyboard is a GAS67, Oil King switches, TX stabbies, and SA keycaps from Amazon. I love it."
] |
>
More info in the key caps? Love them!
|
[
"Laptop bros unite!",
">\n\nMore info in the key caps? Love them!",
">\n\nThanks!",
">\n\nKeyboard is a GAS67, Oil King switches, TX stabbies, and SA keycaps from Amazon. I love it.",
">\n\nLaptop bros unite!"
] |
>
Thanks!
|
[
"Laptop bros unite!",
">\n\nMore info in the key caps? Love them!",
">\n\nThanks!",
">\n\nKeyboard is a GAS67, Oil King switches, TX stabbies, and SA keycaps from Amazon. I love it.",
">\n\nLaptop bros unite!",
">\n\nMore info in the key caps? Love them!"
] |
>
Keyboard is a GAS67, Oil King switches, TX stabbies, and SA keycaps from Amazon. I love it.
|
[
"Laptop bros unite!",
">\n\nMore info in the key caps? Love them!",
">\n\nThanks!",
">\n\nKeyboard is a GAS67, Oil King switches, TX stabbies, and SA keycaps from Amazon. I love it.",
">\n\nLaptop bros unite!",
">\n\nMore info in the key caps? Love them!",
">\n\nThanks!"
] |
>
|
[
"Laptop bros unite!",
">\n\nMore info in the key caps? Love them!",
">\n\nThanks!",
">\n\nKeyboard is a GAS67, Oil King switches, TX stabbies, and SA keycaps from Amazon. I love it.",
">\n\nLaptop bros unite!",
">\n\nMore info in the key caps? Love them!",
">\n\nThanks!",
">\n\nKeyboard is a GAS67, Oil King switches, TX stabbies, and SA keycaps from Amazon. I love it."
] |
That’s the difference between him & trump. Trump would go to sleep with a smile on his face thinking of how he “beat” those afghans
|
[] |
>
How Trump broke the system that offers protection to Afghan allies The number of SIVs issued dropped by the hundreds. Iraqi SIVs fell from 557 in 2017 to 152 in 2019; the number of Afghan SIVs went from 4,120 in 2017 to 1,799 in 2020, as the number of applicants ballooned.
The processing time for Afghan SIV applicants in early 2021 reached 703 days.
|
[
"That’s the difference between him & trump. Trump would go to sleep with a smile on his face thinking of how he “beat” those afghans"
] |
>
Whipple wrote that former White House press secretary [Jen Psaki ] told him that Biden “over the next couple of days ... just felt a deep, misunderstood sadness.”
This goes to show you how much personal responsibility he takes into the decisions he makes. I'm glad we have a Commander in Chief like that.
|
[
"That’s the difference between him & trump. Trump would go to sleep with a smile on his face thinking of how he “beat” those afghans",
">\n\nHow Trump broke the system that offers protection to Afghan allies The number of SIVs issued dropped by the hundreds. Iraqi SIVs fell from 557 in 2017 to 152 in 2019; the number of Afghan SIVs went from 4,120 in 2017 to 1,799 in 2020, as the number of applicants ballooned.\nThe processing time for Afghan SIV applicants in early 2021 reached 703 days."
] |
>
We can go on and on about the good and the bad of any administration, but this is the best move any president has made in my lifetime and I will make sure I give it appropriate recognition.
And he knew the gravity of the situation - all the more credit
Well done.
|
[
"That’s the difference between him & trump. Trump would go to sleep with a smile on his face thinking of how he “beat” those afghans",
">\n\nHow Trump broke the system that offers protection to Afghan allies The number of SIVs issued dropped by the hundreds. Iraqi SIVs fell from 557 in 2017 to 152 in 2019; the number of Afghan SIVs went from 4,120 in 2017 to 1,799 in 2020, as the number of applicants ballooned.\nThe processing time for Afghan SIV applicants in early 2021 reached 703 days.",
">\n\n\nWhipple wrote that former White House press secretary [Jen Psaki ] told him that Biden “over the next couple of days ... just felt a deep, misunderstood sadness.” \n\nThis goes to show you how much personal responsibility he takes into the decisions he makes. I'm glad we have a Commander in Chief like that."
] |
>
Trump made the deal/decision though, Biden followed through with it.
|
[
"That’s the difference between him & trump. Trump would go to sleep with a smile on his face thinking of how he “beat” those afghans",
">\n\nHow Trump broke the system that offers protection to Afghan allies The number of SIVs issued dropped by the hundreds. Iraqi SIVs fell from 557 in 2017 to 152 in 2019; the number of Afghan SIVs went from 4,120 in 2017 to 1,799 in 2020, as the number of applicants ballooned.\nThe processing time for Afghan SIV applicants in early 2021 reached 703 days.",
">\n\n\nWhipple wrote that former White House press secretary [Jen Psaki ] told him that Biden “over the next couple of days ... just felt a deep, misunderstood sadness.” \n\nThis goes to show you how much personal responsibility he takes into the decisions he makes. I'm glad we have a Commander in Chief like that.",
">\n\nWe can go on and on about the good and the bad of any administration, but this is the best move any president has made in my lifetime and I will make sure I give it appropriate recognition.\nAnd he knew the gravity of the situation - all the more credit\nWell done."
] |
>
Trump had four years to leave Afghanistan and Biden had every opportunity to stay.
|
[
"That’s the difference between him & trump. Trump would go to sleep with a smile on his face thinking of how he “beat” those afghans",
">\n\nHow Trump broke the system that offers protection to Afghan allies The number of SIVs issued dropped by the hundreds. Iraqi SIVs fell from 557 in 2017 to 152 in 2019; the number of Afghan SIVs went from 4,120 in 2017 to 1,799 in 2020, as the number of applicants ballooned.\nThe processing time for Afghan SIV applicants in early 2021 reached 703 days.",
">\n\n\nWhipple wrote that former White House press secretary [Jen Psaki ] told him that Biden “over the next couple of days ... just felt a deep, misunderstood sadness.” \n\nThis goes to show you how much personal responsibility he takes into the decisions he makes. I'm glad we have a Commander in Chief like that.",
">\n\nWe can go on and on about the good and the bad of any administration, but this is the best move any president has made in my lifetime and I will make sure I give it appropriate recognition.\nAnd he knew the gravity of the situation - all the more credit\nWell done.",
">\n\nTrump made the deal/decision though, Biden followed through with it."
] |
>
Obama had eight years to leave.
|
[
"That’s the difference between him & trump. Trump would go to sleep with a smile on his face thinking of how he “beat” those afghans",
">\n\nHow Trump broke the system that offers protection to Afghan allies The number of SIVs issued dropped by the hundreds. Iraqi SIVs fell from 557 in 2017 to 152 in 2019; the number of Afghan SIVs went from 4,120 in 2017 to 1,799 in 2020, as the number of applicants ballooned.\nThe processing time for Afghan SIV applicants in early 2021 reached 703 days.",
">\n\n\nWhipple wrote that former White House press secretary [Jen Psaki ] told him that Biden “over the next couple of days ... just felt a deep, misunderstood sadness.” \n\nThis goes to show you how much personal responsibility he takes into the decisions he makes. I'm glad we have a Commander in Chief like that.",
">\n\nWe can go on and on about the good and the bad of any administration, but this is the best move any president has made in my lifetime and I will make sure I give it appropriate recognition.\nAnd he knew the gravity of the situation - all the more credit\nWell done.",
">\n\nTrump made the deal/decision though, Biden followed through with it.",
">\n\nTrump had four years to leave Afghanistan and Biden had every opportunity to stay."
] |
>
Yes, he's also to blame.
|
[
"That’s the difference between him & trump. Trump would go to sleep with a smile on his face thinking of how he “beat” those afghans",
">\n\nHow Trump broke the system that offers protection to Afghan allies The number of SIVs issued dropped by the hundreds. Iraqi SIVs fell from 557 in 2017 to 152 in 2019; the number of Afghan SIVs went from 4,120 in 2017 to 1,799 in 2020, as the number of applicants ballooned.\nThe processing time for Afghan SIV applicants in early 2021 reached 703 days.",
">\n\n\nWhipple wrote that former White House press secretary [Jen Psaki ] told him that Biden “over the next couple of days ... just felt a deep, misunderstood sadness.” \n\nThis goes to show you how much personal responsibility he takes into the decisions he makes. I'm glad we have a Commander in Chief like that.",
">\n\nWe can go on and on about the good and the bad of any administration, but this is the best move any president has made in my lifetime and I will make sure I give it appropriate recognition.\nAnd he knew the gravity of the situation - all the more credit\nWell done.",
">\n\nTrump made the deal/decision though, Biden followed through with it.",
">\n\nTrump had four years to leave Afghanistan and Biden had every opportunity to stay.",
">\n\nObama had eight years to leave."
] |
>
Joe Biden has a conscience. He feels empathy for others and he has the ability to recognize mistakes and learn from them. That is a good thing.
The Afghan withdrawal was set up for failure and there wasn't a hell of a lot that could be done about it, especially with the inaccurate intel he had available. Nonetheless, Biden took responsibility as the Commander in Chief. That's my President.
|
[
"That’s the difference between him & trump. Trump would go to sleep with a smile on his face thinking of how he “beat” those afghans",
">\n\nHow Trump broke the system that offers protection to Afghan allies The number of SIVs issued dropped by the hundreds. Iraqi SIVs fell from 557 in 2017 to 152 in 2019; the number of Afghan SIVs went from 4,120 in 2017 to 1,799 in 2020, as the number of applicants ballooned.\nThe processing time for Afghan SIV applicants in early 2021 reached 703 days.",
">\n\n\nWhipple wrote that former White House press secretary [Jen Psaki ] told him that Biden “over the next couple of days ... just felt a deep, misunderstood sadness.” \n\nThis goes to show you how much personal responsibility he takes into the decisions he makes. I'm glad we have a Commander in Chief like that.",
">\n\nWe can go on and on about the good and the bad of any administration, but this is the best move any president has made in my lifetime and I will make sure I give it appropriate recognition.\nAnd he knew the gravity of the situation - all the more credit\nWell done.",
">\n\nTrump made the deal/decision though, Biden followed through with it.",
">\n\nTrump had four years to leave Afghanistan and Biden had every opportunity to stay.",
">\n\nObama had eight years to leave.",
">\n\nYes, he's also to blame."
] |
>
Oh shit! What’s that called??? Hold on, I’m thinking… oh yeah, Empathy?
|
[
"That’s the difference between him & trump. Trump would go to sleep with a smile on his face thinking of how he “beat” those afghans",
">\n\nHow Trump broke the system that offers protection to Afghan allies The number of SIVs issued dropped by the hundreds. Iraqi SIVs fell from 557 in 2017 to 152 in 2019; the number of Afghan SIVs went from 4,120 in 2017 to 1,799 in 2020, as the number of applicants ballooned.\nThe processing time for Afghan SIV applicants in early 2021 reached 703 days.",
">\n\n\nWhipple wrote that former White House press secretary [Jen Psaki ] told him that Biden “over the next couple of days ... just felt a deep, misunderstood sadness.” \n\nThis goes to show you how much personal responsibility he takes into the decisions he makes. I'm glad we have a Commander in Chief like that.",
">\n\nWe can go on and on about the good and the bad of any administration, but this is the best move any president has made in my lifetime and I will make sure I give it appropriate recognition.\nAnd he knew the gravity of the situation - all the more credit\nWell done.",
">\n\nTrump made the deal/decision though, Biden followed through with it.",
">\n\nTrump had four years to leave Afghanistan and Biden had every opportunity to stay.",
">\n\nObama had eight years to leave.",
">\n\nYes, he's also to blame.",
">\n\nJoe Biden has a conscience. He feels empathy for others and he has the ability to recognize mistakes and learn from them. That is a good thing. \nThe Afghan withdrawal was set up for failure and there wasn't a hell of a lot that could be done about it, especially with the inaccurate intel he had available. Nonetheless, Biden took responsibility as the Commander in Chief. That's my President."
] |
>
I will throw thay orange turd one atom of a crumb.
Despite Trump setting it up to be chaotic.
I think it was a doomed pull out no matter who would of been president.
Shit isn't always easy.
|
[
"That’s the difference between him & trump. Trump would go to sleep with a smile on his face thinking of how he “beat” those afghans",
">\n\nHow Trump broke the system that offers protection to Afghan allies The number of SIVs issued dropped by the hundreds. Iraqi SIVs fell from 557 in 2017 to 152 in 2019; the number of Afghan SIVs went from 4,120 in 2017 to 1,799 in 2020, as the number of applicants ballooned.\nThe processing time for Afghan SIV applicants in early 2021 reached 703 days.",
">\n\n\nWhipple wrote that former White House press secretary [Jen Psaki ] told him that Biden “over the next couple of days ... just felt a deep, misunderstood sadness.” \n\nThis goes to show you how much personal responsibility he takes into the decisions he makes. I'm glad we have a Commander in Chief like that.",
">\n\nWe can go on and on about the good and the bad of any administration, but this is the best move any president has made in my lifetime and I will make sure I give it appropriate recognition.\nAnd he knew the gravity of the situation - all the more credit\nWell done.",
">\n\nTrump made the deal/decision though, Biden followed through with it.",
">\n\nTrump had four years to leave Afghanistan and Biden had every opportunity to stay.",
">\n\nObama had eight years to leave.",
">\n\nYes, he's also to blame.",
">\n\nJoe Biden has a conscience. He feels empathy for others and he has the ability to recognize mistakes and learn from them. That is a good thing. \nThe Afghan withdrawal was set up for failure and there wasn't a hell of a lot that could be done about it, especially with the inaccurate intel he had available. Nonetheless, Biden took responsibility as the Commander in Chief. That's my President.",
">\n\nOh shit! What’s that called??? Hold on, I’m thinking… oh yeah, Empathy?"
] |
>
Maybe, but Trump also freed 5000 Taliban prisoners, so he actively made the situation worse.
|
[
"That’s the difference between him & trump. Trump would go to sleep with a smile on his face thinking of how he “beat” those afghans",
">\n\nHow Trump broke the system that offers protection to Afghan allies The number of SIVs issued dropped by the hundreds. Iraqi SIVs fell from 557 in 2017 to 152 in 2019; the number of Afghan SIVs went from 4,120 in 2017 to 1,799 in 2020, as the number of applicants ballooned.\nThe processing time for Afghan SIV applicants in early 2021 reached 703 days.",
">\n\n\nWhipple wrote that former White House press secretary [Jen Psaki ] told him that Biden “over the next couple of days ... just felt a deep, misunderstood sadness.” \n\nThis goes to show you how much personal responsibility he takes into the decisions he makes. I'm glad we have a Commander in Chief like that.",
">\n\nWe can go on and on about the good and the bad of any administration, but this is the best move any president has made in my lifetime and I will make sure I give it appropriate recognition.\nAnd he knew the gravity of the situation - all the more credit\nWell done.",
">\n\nTrump made the deal/decision though, Biden followed through with it.",
">\n\nTrump had four years to leave Afghanistan and Biden had every opportunity to stay.",
">\n\nObama had eight years to leave.",
">\n\nYes, he's also to blame.",
">\n\nJoe Biden has a conscience. He feels empathy for others and he has the ability to recognize mistakes and learn from them. That is a good thing. \nThe Afghan withdrawal was set up for failure and there wasn't a hell of a lot that could be done about it, especially with the inaccurate intel he had available. Nonetheless, Biden took responsibility as the Commander in Chief. That's my President.",
">\n\nOh shit! What’s that called??? Hold on, I’m thinking… oh yeah, Empathy?",
">\n\nI will throw thay orange turd one atom of a crumb.\nDespite Trump setting it up to be chaotic.\nI think it was a doomed pull out no matter who would of been president.\nShit isn't always easy."
] |
>
Yeah agreed.
If trump actually won a second term. Would he have even pulled out?
Would we be bitching at how he fucked it up instead of the right bitching(in bad faith.) at Joe biden.
(Not trying to bother sides anything incase my post.sounds like it. More like shoe on other foot.)
|
[
"That’s the difference between him & trump. Trump would go to sleep with a smile on his face thinking of how he “beat” those afghans",
">\n\nHow Trump broke the system that offers protection to Afghan allies The number of SIVs issued dropped by the hundreds. Iraqi SIVs fell from 557 in 2017 to 152 in 2019; the number of Afghan SIVs went from 4,120 in 2017 to 1,799 in 2020, as the number of applicants ballooned.\nThe processing time for Afghan SIV applicants in early 2021 reached 703 days.",
">\n\n\nWhipple wrote that former White House press secretary [Jen Psaki ] told him that Biden “over the next couple of days ... just felt a deep, misunderstood sadness.” \n\nThis goes to show you how much personal responsibility he takes into the decisions he makes. I'm glad we have a Commander in Chief like that.",
">\n\nWe can go on and on about the good and the bad of any administration, but this is the best move any president has made in my lifetime and I will make sure I give it appropriate recognition.\nAnd he knew the gravity of the situation - all the more credit\nWell done.",
">\n\nTrump made the deal/decision though, Biden followed through with it.",
">\n\nTrump had four years to leave Afghanistan and Biden had every opportunity to stay.",
">\n\nObama had eight years to leave.",
">\n\nYes, he's also to blame.",
">\n\nJoe Biden has a conscience. He feels empathy for others and he has the ability to recognize mistakes and learn from them. That is a good thing. \nThe Afghan withdrawal was set up for failure and there wasn't a hell of a lot that could be done about it, especially with the inaccurate intel he had available. Nonetheless, Biden took responsibility as the Commander in Chief. That's my President.",
">\n\nOh shit! What’s that called??? Hold on, I’m thinking… oh yeah, Empathy?",
">\n\nI will throw thay orange turd one atom of a crumb.\nDespite Trump setting it up to be chaotic.\nI think it was a doomed pull out no matter who would of been president.\nShit isn't always easy.",
">\n\nMaybe, but Trump also freed 5000 Taliban prisoners, so he actively made the situation worse."
] |
>
I wonder this too. Would Trump 2 have found some reason to increase the number of American soldiers in Afghanistan? Obama had that problem... I'm sure Obama wanted to get out of Afghanistan, but instead he prolonged the misery. All with best intentions, of course.
|
[
"That’s the difference between him & trump. Trump would go to sleep with a smile on his face thinking of how he “beat” those afghans",
">\n\nHow Trump broke the system that offers protection to Afghan allies The number of SIVs issued dropped by the hundreds. Iraqi SIVs fell from 557 in 2017 to 152 in 2019; the number of Afghan SIVs went from 4,120 in 2017 to 1,799 in 2020, as the number of applicants ballooned.\nThe processing time for Afghan SIV applicants in early 2021 reached 703 days.",
">\n\n\nWhipple wrote that former White House press secretary [Jen Psaki ] told him that Biden “over the next couple of days ... just felt a deep, misunderstood sadness.” \n\nThis goes to show you how much personal responsibility he takes into the decisions he makes. I'm glad we have a Commander in Chief like that.",
">\n\nWe can go on and on about the good and the bad of any administration, but this is the best move any president has made in my lifetime and I will make sure I give it appropriate recognition.\nAnd he knew the gravity of the situation - all the more credit\nWell done.",
">\n\nTrump made the deal/decision though, Biden followed through with it.",
">\n\nTrump had four years to leave Afghanistan and Biden had every opportunity to stay.",
">\n\nObama had eight years to leave.",
">\n\nYes, he's also to blame.",
">\n\nJoe Biden has a conscience. He feels empathy for others and he has the ability to recognize mistakes and learn from them. That is a good thing. \nThe Afghan withdrawal was set up for failure and there wasn't a hell of a lot that could be done about it, especially with the inaccurate intel he had available. Nonetheless, Biden took responsibility as the Commander in Chief. That's my President.",
">\n\nOh shit! What’s that called??? Hold on, I’m thinking… oh yeah, Empathy?",
">\n\nI will throw thay orange turd one atom of a crumb.\nDespite Trump setting it up to be chaotic.\nI think it was a doomed pull out no matter who would of been president.\nShit isn't always easy.",
">\n\nMaybe, but Trump also freed 5000 Taliban prisoners, so he actively made the situation worse.",
">\n\nYeah agreed.\nIf trump actually won a second term. Would he have even pulled out? \nWould we be bitching at how he fucked it up instead of the right bitching(in bad faith.) at Joe biden.\n(Not trying to bother sides anything incase my post.sounds like it. More like shoe on other foot.)"
] |
>
No Trump's agreement gave him no option but to pull out. Don't let anyone kid you that we were going to stay. Our allies, at minimum, would have left and that would have put additional pressure on US forces. After action reports indicated the already shaky Afghan government we setup was seen as illegitimate when Trump released those 5k Taliban fighters. The ANA were all getting the best deals they possibly could from that point forward.
|
[
"That’s the difference between him & trump. Trump would go to sleep with a smile on his face thinking of how he “beat” those afghans",
">\n\nHow Trump broke the system that offers protection to Afghan allies The number of SIVs issued dropped by the hundreds. Iraqi SIVs fell from 557 in 2017 to 152 in 2019; the number of Afghan SIVs went from 4,120 in 2017 to 1,799 in 2020, as the number of applicants ballooned.\nThe processing time for Afghan SIV applicants in early 2021 reached 703 days.",
">\n\n\nWhipple wrote that former White House press secretary [Jen Psaki ] told him that Biden “over the next couple of days ... just felt a deep, misunderstood sadness.” \n\nThis goes to show you how much personal responsibility he takes into the decisions he makes. I'm glad we have a Commander in Chief like that.",
">\n\nWe can go on and on about the good and the bad of any administration, but this is the best move any president has made in my lifetime and I will make sure I give it appropriate recognition.\nAnd he knew the gravity of the situation - all the more credit\nWell done.",
">\n\nTrump made the deal/decision though, Biden followed through with it.",
">\n\nTrump had four years to leave Afghanistan and Biden had every opportunity to stay.",
">\n\nObama had eight years to leave.",
">\n\nYes, he's also to blame.",
">\n\nJoe Biden has a conscience. He feels empathy for others and he has the ability to recognize mistakes and learn from them. That is a good thing. \nThe Afghan withdrawal was set up for failure and there wasn't a hell of a lot that could be done about it, especially with the inaccurate intel he had available. Nonetheless, Biden took responsibility as the Commander in Chief. That's my President.",
">\n\nOh shit! What’s that called??? Hold on, I’m thinking… oh yeah, Empathy?",
">\n\nI will throw thay orange turd one atom of a crumb.\nDespite Trump setting it up to be chaotic.\nI think it was a doomed pull out no matter who would of been president.\nShit isn't always easy.",
">\n\nMaybe, but Trump also freed 5000 Taliban prisoners, so he actively made the situation worse.",
">\n\nYeah agreed.\nIf trump actually won a second term. Would he have even pulled out? \nWould we be bitching at how he fucked it up instead of the right bitching(in bad faith.) at Joe biden.\n(Not trying to bother sides anything incase my post.sounds like it. More like shoe on other foot.)",
">\n\nI wonder this too. Would Trump 2 have found some reason to increase the number of American soldiers in Afghanistan? Obama had that problem... I'm sure Obama wanted to get out of Afghanistan, but instead he prolonged the misery. All with best intentions, of course."
] |
>
Getting out of Afghanistan was always going to be a shit show considering trump intentionally left it as a minefield for Biden. trump didn't assist any Afghanis in leaving the country and the Biden admin helped evacuate over 100K people in a short period of time. There was no way of stopping a suicide bomber in the midst of that chaos.
|
[
"That’s the difference between him & trump. Trump would go to sleep with a smile on his face thinking of how he “beat” those afghans",
">\n\nHow Trump broke the system that offers protection to Afghan allies The number of SIVs issued dropped by the hundreds. Iraqi SIVs fell from 557 in 2017 to 152 in 2019; the number of Afghan SIVs went from 4,120 in 2017 to 1,799 in 2020, as the number of applicants ballooned.\nThe processing time for Afghan SIV applicants in early 2021 reached 703 days.",
">\n\n\nWhipple wrote that former White House press secretary [Jen Psaki ] told him that Biden “over the next couple of days ... just felt a deep, misunderstood sadness.” \n\nThis goes to show you how much personal responsibility he takes into the decisions he makes. I'm glad we have a Commander in Chief like that.",
">\n\nWe can go on and on about the good and the bad of any administration, but this is the best move any president has made in my lifetime and I will make sure I give it appropriate recognition.\nAnd he knew the gravity of the situation - all the more credit\nWell done.",
">\n\nTrump made the deal/decision though, Biden followed through with it.",
">\n\nTrump had four years to leave Afghanistan and Biden had every opportunity to stay.",
">\n\nObama had eight years to leave.",
">\n\nYes, he's also to blame.",
">\n\nJoe Biden has a conscience. He feels empathy for others and he has the ability to recognize mistakes and learn from them. That is a good thing. \nThe Afghan withdrawal was set up for failure and there wasn't a hell of a lot that could be done about it, especially with the inaccurate intel he had available. Nonetheless, Biden took responsibility as the Commander in Chief. That's my President.",
">\n\nOh shit! What’s that called??? Hold on, I’m thinking… oh yeah, Empathy?",
">\n\nI will throw thay orange turd one atom of a crumb.\nDespite Trump setting it up to be chaotic.\nI think it was a doomed pull out no matter who would of been president.\nShit isn't always easy.",
">\n\nMaybe, but Trump also freed 5000 Taliban prisoners, so he actively made the situation worse.",
">\n\nYeah agreed.\nIf trump actually won a second term. Would he have even pulled out? \nWould we be bitching at how he fucked it up instead of the right bitching(in bad faith.) at Joe biden.\n(Not trying to bother sides anything incase my post.sounds like it. More like shoe on other foot.)",
">\n\nI wonder this too. Would Trump 2 have found some reason to increase the number of American soldiers in Afghanistan? Obama had that problem... I'm sure Obama wanted to get out of Afghanistan, but instead he prolonged the misery. All with best intentions, of course.",
">\n\nNo Trump's agreement gave him no option but to pull out. Don't let anyone kid you that we were going to stay. Our allies, at minimum, would have left and that would have put additional pressure on US forces. After action reports indicated the already shaky Afghan government we setup was seen as illegitimate when Trump released those 5k Taliban fighters. The ANA were all getting the best deals they possibly could from that point forward."
] |
>
I tried explaining this to a coworker. He was like Biden didn't give a shit and said fuck all those people. Like if that had been Trump you would be singing a different tune. I said, "Well what about who made the deal in the first place?" The response, "Well Trump had a plan." To which I responded, "Oh like his Covid plan? Or medical care plan? Say he has it and does fuck all." These people will defend anything.
|
[
"That’s the difference between him & trump. Trump would go to sleep with a smile on his face thinking of how he “beat” those afghans",
">\n\nHow Trump broke the system that offers protection to Afghan allies The number of SIVs issued dropped by the hundreds. Iraqi SIVs fell from 557 in 2017 to 152 in 2019; the number of Afghan SIVs went from 4,120 in 2017 to 1,799 in 2020, as the number of applicants ballooned.\nThe processing time for Afghan SIV applicants in early 2021 reached 703 days.",
">\n\n\nWhipple wrote that former White House press secretary [Jen Psaki ] told him that Biden “over the next couple of days ... just felt a deep, misunderstood sadness.” \n\nThis goes to show you how much personal responsibility he takes into the decisions he makes. I'm glad we have a Commander in Chief like that.",
">\n\nWe can go on and on about the good and the bad of any administration, but this is the best move any president has made in my lifetime and I will make sure I give it appropriate recognition.\nAnd he knew the gravity of the situation - all the more credit\nWell done.",
">\n\nTrump made the deal/decision though, Biden followed through with it.",
">\n\nTrump had four years to leave Afghanistan and Biden had every opportunity to stay.",
">\n\nObama had eight years to leave.",
">\n\nYes, he's also to blame.",
">\n\nJoe Biden has a conscience. He feels empathy for others and he has the ability to recognize mistakes and learn from them. That is a good thing. \nThe Afghan withdrawal was set up for failure and there wasn't a hell of a lot that could be done about it, especially with the inaccurate intel he had available. Nonetheless, Biden took responsibility as the Commander in Chief. That's my President.",
">\n\nOh shit! What’s that called??? Hold on, I’m thinking… oh yeah, Empathy?",
">\n\nI will throw thay orange turd one atom of a crumb.\nDespite Trump setting it up to be chaotic.\nI think it was a doomed pull out no matter who would of been president.\nShit isn't always easy.",
">\n\nMaybe, but Trump also freed 5000 Taliban prisoners, so he actively made the situation worse.",
">\n\nYeah agreed.\nIf trump actually won a second term. Would he have even pulled out? \nWould we be bitching at how he fucked it up instead of the right bitching(in bad faith.) at Joe biden.\n(Not trying to bother sides anything incase my post.sounds like it. More like shoe on other foot.)",
">\n\nI wonder this too. Would Trump 2 have found some reason to increase the number of American soldiers in Afghanistan? Obama had that problem... I'm sure Obama wanted to get out of Afghanistan, but instead he prolonged the misery. All with best intentions, of course.",
">\n\nNo Trump's agreement gave him no option but to pull out. Don't let anyone kid you that we were going to stay. Our allies, at minimum, would have left and that would have put additional pressure on US forces. After action reports indicated the already shaky Afghan government we setup was seen as illegitimate when Trump released those 5k Taliban fighters. The ANA were all getting the best deals they possibly could from that point forward.",
">\n\nGetting out of Afghanistan was always going to be a shit show considering trump intentionally left it as a minefield for Biden. trump didn't assist any Afghanis in leaving the country and the Biden admin helped evacuate over 100K people in a short period of time. There was no way of stopping a suicide bomber in the midst of that chaos."
] |
>
There was no good way to leave Afghanistan. Period. Not his fault.
|
[
"That’s the difference between him & trump. Trump would go to sleep with a smile on his face thinking of how he “beat” those afghans",
">\n\nHow Trump broke the system that offers protection to Afghan allies The number of SIVs issued dropped by the hundreds. Iraqi SIVs fell from 557 in 2017 to 152 in 2019; the number of Afghan SIVs went from 4,120 in 2017 to 1,799 in 2020, as the number of applicants ballooned.\nThe processing time for Afghan SIV applicants in early 2021 reached 703 days.",
">\n\n\nWhipple wrote that former White House press secretary [Jen Psaki ] told him that Biden “over the next couple of days ... just felt a deep, misunderstood sadness.” \n\nThis goes to show you how much personal responsibility he takes into the decisions he makes. I'm glad we have a Commander in Chief like that.",
">\n\nWe can go on and on about the good and the bad of any administration, but this is the best move any president has made in my lifetime and I will make sure I give it appropriate recognition.\nAnd he knew the gravity of the situation - all the more credit\nWell done.",
">\n\nTrump made the deal/decision though, Biden followed through with it.",
">\n\nTrump had four years to leave Afghanistan and Biden had every opportunity to stay.",
">\n\nObama had eight years to leave.",
">\n\nYes, he's also to blame.",
">\n\nJoe Biden has a conscience. He feels empathy for others and he has the ability to recognize mistakes and learn from them. That is a good thing. \nThe Afghan withdrawal was set up for failure and there wasn't a hell of a lot that could be done about it, especially with the inaccurate intel he had available. Nonetheless, Biden took responsibility as the Commander in Chief. That's my President.",
">\n\nOh shit! What’s that called??? Hold on, I’m thinking… oh yeah, Empathy?",
">\n\nI will throw thay orange turd one atom of a crumb.\nDespite Trump setting it up to be chaotic.\nI think it was a doomed pull out no matter who would of been president.\nShit isn't always easy.",
">\n\nMaybe, but Trump also freed 5000 Taliban prisoners, so he actively made the situation worse.",
">\n\nYeah agreed.\nIf trump actually won a second term. Would he have even pulled out? \nWould we be bitching at how he fucked it up instead of the right bitching(in bad faith.) at Joe biden.\n(Not trying to bother sides anything incase my post.sounds like it. More like shoe on other foot.)",
">\n\nI wonder this too. Would Trump 2 have found some reason to increase the number of American soldiers in Afghanistan? Obama had that problem... I'm sure Obama wanted to get out of Afghanistan, but instead he prolonged the misery. All with best intentions, of course.",
">\n\nNo Trump's agreement gave him no option but to pull out. Don't let anyone kid you that we were going to stay. Our allies, at minimum, would have left and that would have put additional pressure on US forces. After action reports indicated the already shaky Afghan government we setup was seen as illegitimate when Trump released those 5k Taliban fighters. The ANA were all getting the best deals they possibly could from that point forward.",
">\n\nGetting out of Afghanistan was always going to be a shit show considering trump intentionally left it as a minefield for Biden. trump didn't assist any Afghanis in leaving the country and the Biden admin helped evacuate over 100K people in a short period of time. There was no way of stopping a suicide bomber in the midst of that chaos.",
">\n\nI tried explaining this to a coworker. He was like Biden didn't give a shit and said fuck all those people. Like if that had been Trump you would be singing a different tune. I said, \"Well what about who made the deal in the first place?\" The response, \"Well Trump had a plan.\" To which I responded, \"Oh like his Covid plan? Or medical care plan? Say he has it and does fuck all.\" These people will defend anything."
] |
>
and I would've never lost not even one second of sleep, because I don't need to sleep at all really I'm in Perfect Health and Dr. Ronnie, he used to be your Doctor now he's your Congressman in the Great State of Texas, I love Texas, and he said my body is in Incredible Shape, he told me I was very Strong, very Youthful, and probably at Genius Levels, nobody's ever Aced the Presidential Test besides me, Obama wouldn't even take it and yet I got 100 Percent plus Bonus Points, nobody's ever seen it that good not even any of the Medical Doctors and Scientists around the World they couldn't believe it, "Sir, you're smarter than Albert Einstein and a lot better looking," I'm like the Robert Redford of smart people but the Fake News won't give me Credit for it. they have a Museum just for George Washington's Wooden Teeth but the Radical Left won't even let me put up a Statue to honor America's Favorite President, which is you're thinking me I hope, and as I've said many times Promises Made Promises Kept. you don't get that with Democrats, you only get Sadness and Defeat because they hate helping people and My Tax Plan, which was incredible by the way the numbers were through the roof but now they wanna take it all away, Sleepy Joe and the Democrats want to make your Taxes go up and the value of your Home go down. we may as well be living in Mexico that's how bad it's gotten.
|
[
"That’s the difference between him & trump. Trump would go to sleep with a smile on his face thinking of how he “beat” those afghans",
">\n\nHow Trump broke the system that offers protection to Afghan allies The number of SIVs issued dropped by the hundreds. Iraqi SIVs fell from 557 in 2017 to 152 in 2019; the number of Afghan SIVs went from 4,120 in 2017 to 1,799 in 2020, as the number of applicants ballooned.\nThe processing time for Afghan SIV applicants in early 2021 reached 703 days.",
">\n\n\nWhipple wrote that former White House press secretary [Jen Psaki ] told him that Biden “over the next couple of days ... just felt a deep, misunderstood sadness.” \n\nThis goes to show you how much personal responsibility he takes into the decisions he makes. I'm glad we have a Commander in Chief like that.",
">\n\nWe can go on and on about the good and the bad of any administration, but this is the best move any president has made in my lifetime and I will make sure I give it appropriate recognition.\nAnd he knew the gravity of the situation - all the more credit\nWell done.",
">\n\nTrump made the deal/decision though, Biden followed through with it.",
">\n\nTrump had four years to leave Afghanistan and Biden had every opportunity to stay.",
">\n\nObama had eight years to leave.",
">\n\nYes, he's also to blame.",
">\n\nJoe Biden has a conscience. He feels empathy for others and he has the ability to recognize mistakes and learn from them. That is a good thing. \nThe Afghan withdrawal was set up for failure and there wasn't a hell of a lot that could be done about it, especially with the inaccurate intel he had available. Nonetheless, Biden took responsibility as the Commander in Chief. That's my President.",
">\n\nOh shit! What’s that called??? Hold on, I’m thinking… oh yeah, Empathy?",
">\n\nI will throw thay orange turd one atom of a crumb.\nDespite Trump setting it up to be chaotic.\nI think it was a doomed pull out no matter who would of been president.\nShit isn't always easy.",
">\n\nMaybe, but Trump also freed 5000 Taliban prisoners, so he actively made the situation worse.",
">\n\nYeah agreed.\nIf trump actually won a second term. Would he have even pulled out? \nWould we be bitching at how he fucked it up instead of the right bitching(in bad faith.) at Joe biden.\n(Not trying to bother sides anything incase my post.sounds like it. More like shoe on other foot.)",
">\n\nI wonder this too. Would Trump 2 have found some reason to increase the number of American soldiers in Afghanistan? Obama had that problem... I'm sure Obama wanted to get out of Afghanistan, but instead he prolonged the misery. All with best intentions, of course.",
">\n\nNo Trump's agreement gave him no option but to pull out. Don't let anyone kid you that we were going to stay. Our allies, at minimum, would have left and that would have put additional pressure on US forces. After action reports indicated the already shaky Afghan government we setup was seen as illegitimate when Trump released those 5k Taliban fighters. The ANA were all getting the best deals they possibly could from that point forward.",
">\n\nGetting out of Afghanistan was always going to be a shit show considering trump intentionally left it as a minefield for Biden. trump didn't assist any Afghanis in leaving the country and the Biden admin helped evacuate over 100K people in a short period of time. There was no way of stopping a suicide bomber in the midst of that chaos.",
">\n\nI tried explaining this to a coworker. He was like Biden didn't give a shit and said fuck all those people. Like if that had been Trump you would be singing a different tune. I said, \"Well what about who made the deal in the first place?\" The response, \"Well Trump had a plan.\" To which I responded, \"Oh like his Covid plan? Or medical care plan? Say he has it and does fuck all.\" These people will defend anything.",
">\n\nThere was no good way to leave Afghanistan. Period. Not his fault."
] |
>
No reason it should. The Afghan withdrawal went smoothly and as planned.
Biden extended the Trump surrender agreement to the Kaliban to give Afghans even more time and Taliban stuck to the agreement and didn't attack US troops.
The Afghans who flooded the airport were people who Biden had been given an extra six months to get out. They made a poor decision. Many had actually gone back to Afghanistan and got caught by the totally predictable collapse of the US back warlords. Trump had long ago abandoned any Afghans employed by US.
|
[
"That’s the difference between him & trump. Trump would go to sleep with a smile on his face thinking of how he “beat” those afghans",
">\n\nHow Trump broke the system that offers protection to Afghan allies The number of SIVs issued dropped by the hundreds. Iraqi SIVs fell from 557 in 2017 to 152 in 2019; the number of Afghan SIVs went from 4,120 in 2017 to 1,799 in 2020, as the number of applicants ballooned.\nThe processing time for Afghan SIV applicants in early 2021 reached 703 days.",
">\n\n\nWhipple wrote that former White House press secretary [Jen Psaki ] told him that Biden “over the next couple of days ... just felt a deep, misunderstood sadness.” \n\nThis goes to show you how much personal responsibility he takes into the decisions he makes. I'm glad we have a Commander in Chief like that.",
">\n\nWe can go on and on about the good and the bad of any administration, but this is the best move any president has made in my lifetime and I will make sure I give it appropriate recognition.\nAnd he knew the gravity of the situation - all the more credit\nWell done.",
">\n\nTrump made the deal/decision though, Biden followed through with it.",
">\n\nTrump had four years to leave Afghanistan and Biden had every opportunity to stay.",
">\n\nObama had eight years to leave.",
">\n\nYes, he's also to blame.",
">\n\nJoe Biden has a conscience. He feels empathy for others and he has the ability to recognize mistakes and learn from them. That is a good thing. \nThe Afghan withdrawal was set up for failure and there wasn't a hell of a lot that could be done about it, especially with the inaccurate intel he had available. Nonetheless, Biden took responsibility as the Commander in Chief. That's my President.",
">\n\nOh shit! What’s that called??? Hold on, I’m thinking… oh yeah, Empathy?",
">\n\nI will throw thay orange turd one atom of a crumb.\nDespite Trump setting it up to be chaotic.\nI think it was a doomed pull out no matter who would of been president.\nShit isn't always easy.",
">\n\nMaybe, but Trump also freed 5000 Taliban prisoners, so he actively made the situation worse.",
">\n\nYeah agreed.\nIf trump actually won a second term. Would he have even pulled out? \nWould we be bitching at how he fucked it up instead of the right bitching(in bad faith.) at Joe biden.\n(Not trying to bother sides anything incase my post.sounds like it. More like shoe on other foot.)",
">\n\nI wonder this too. Would Trump 2 have found some reason to increase the number of American soldiers in Afghanistan? Obama had that problem... I'm sure Obama wanted to get out of Afghanistan, but instead he prolonged the misery. All with best intentions, of course.",
">\n\nNo Trump's agreement gave him no option but to pull out. Don't let anyone kid you that we were going to stay. Our allies, at minimum, would have left and that would have put additional pressure on US forces. After action reports indicated the already shaky Afghan government we setup was seen as illegitimate when Trump released those 5k Taliban fighters. The ANA were all getting the best deals they possibly could from that point forward.",
">\n\nGetting out of Afghanistan was always going to be a shit show considering trump intentionally left it as a minefield for Biden. trump didn't assist any Afghanis in leaving the country and the Biden admin helped evacuate over 100K people in a short period of time. There was no way of stopping a suicide bomber in the midst of that chaos.",
">\n\nI tried explaining this to a coworker. He was like Biden didn't give a shit and said fuck all those people. Like if that had been Trump you would be singing a different tune. I said, \"Well what about who made the deal in the first place?\" The response, \"Well Trump had a plan.\" To which I responded, \"Oh like his Covid plan? Or medical care plan? Say he has it and does fuck all.\" These people will defend anything.",
">\n\nThere was no good way to leave Afghanistan. Period. Not his fault.",
">\n\nand I would've never lost not even one second of sleep, because I don't need to sleep at all really I'm in Perfect Health and Dr. Ronnie, he used to be your Doctor now he's your Congressman in the Great State of Texas, I love Texas, and he said my body is in Incredible Shape, he told me I was very Strong, very Youthful, and probably at Genius Levels, nobody's ever Aced the Presidential Test besides me, Obama wouldn't even take it and yet I got 100 Percent plus Bonus Points, nobody's ever seen it that good not even any of the Medical Doctors and Scientists around the World they couldn't believe it, \"Sir, you're smarter than Albert Einstein and a lot better looking,\" I'm like the Robert Redford of smart people but the Fake News won't give me Credit for it. they have a Museum just for George Washington's Wooden Teeth but the Radical Left won't even let me put up a Statue to honor America's Favorite President, which is you're thinking me I hope, and as I've said many times Promises Made Promises Kept. you don't get that with Democrats, you only get Sadness and Defeat because they hate helping people and My Tax Plan, which was incredible by the way the numbers were through the roof but now they wanna take it all away, Sleepy Joe and the Democrats want to make your Taxes go up and the value of your Home go down. we may as well be living in Mexico that's how bad it's gotten."
] |
>
I’m voting for him again, but this was deeply disappointing and I don’t buy that he was surprised about the Afghan forces crumbling so quickly.
We needed to exit, but why couldn’t the withdrawal have been slowed down?
|
[
"That’s the difference between him & trump. Trump would go to sleep with a smile on his face thinking of how he “beat” those afghans",
">\n\nHow Trump broke the system that offers protection to Afghan allies The number of SIVs issued dropped by the hundreds. Iraqi SIVs fell from 557 in 2017 to 152 in 2019; the number of Afghan SIVs went from 4,120 in 2017 to 1,799 in 2020, as the number of applicants ballooned.\nThe processing time for Afghan SIV applicants in early 2021 reached 703 days.",
">\n\n\nWhipple wrote that former White House press secretary [Jen Psaki ] told him that Biden “over the next couple of days ... just felt a deep, misunderstood sadness.” \n\nThis goes to show you how much personal responsibility he takes into the decisions he makes. I'm glad we have a Commander in Chief like that.",
">\n\nWe can go on and on about the good and the bad of any administration, but this is the best move any president has made in my lifetime and I will make sure I give it appropriate recognition.\nAnd he knew the gravity of the situation - all the more credit\nWell done.",
">\n\nTrump made the deal/decision though, Biden followed through with it.",
">\n\nTrump had four years to leave Afghanistan and Biden had every opportunity to stay.",
">\n\nObama had eight years to leave.",
">\n\nYes, he's also to blame.",
">\n\nJoe Biden has a conscience. He feels empathy for others and he has the ability to recognize mistakes and learn from them. That is a good thing. \nThe Afghan withdrawal was set up for failure and there wasn't a hell of a lot that could be done about it, especially with the inaccurate intel he had available. Nonetheless, Biden took responsibility as the Commander in Chief. That's my President.",
">\n\nOh shit! What’s that called??? Hold on, I’m thinking… oh yeah, Empathy?",
">\n\nI will throw thay orange turd one atom of a crumb.\nDespite Trump setting it up to be chaotic.\nI think it was a doomed pull out no matter who would of been president.\nShit isn't always easy.",
">\n\nMaybe, but Trump also freed 5000 Taliban prisoners, so he actively made the situation worse.",
">\n\nYeah agreed.\nIf trump actually won a second term. Would he have even pulled out? \nWould we be bitching at how he fucked it up instead of the right bitching(in bad faith.) at Joe biden.\n(Not trying to bother sides anything incase my post.sounds like it. More like shoe on other foot.)",
">\n\nI wonder this too. Would Trump 2 have found some reason to increase the number of American soldiers in Afghanistan? Obama had that problem... I'm sure Obama wanted to get out of Afghanistan, but instead he prolonged the misery. All with best intentions, of course.",
">\n\nNo Trump's agreement gave him no option but to pull out. Don't let anyone kid you that we were going to stay. Our allies, at minimum, would have left and that would have put additional pressure on US forces. After action reports indicated the already shaky Afghan government we setup was seen as illegitimate when Trump released those 5k Taliban fighters. The ANA were all getting the best deals they possibly could from that point forward.",
">\n\nGetting out of Afghanistan was always going to be a shit show considering trump intentionally left it as a minefield for Biden. trump didn't assist any Afghanis in leaving the country and the Biden admin helped evacuate over 100K people in a short period of time. There was no way of stopping a suicide bomber in the midst of that chaos.",
">\n\nI tried explaining this to a coworker. He was like Biden didn't give a shit and said fuck all those people. Like if that had been Trump you would be singing a different tune. I said, \"Well what about who made the deal in the first place?\" The response, \"Well Trump had a plan.\" To which I responded, \"Oh like his Covid plan? Or medical care plan? Say he has it and does fuck all.\" These people will defend anything.",
">\n\nThere was no good way to leave Afghanistan. Period. Not his fault.",
">\n\nand I would've never lost not even one second of sleep, because I don't need to sleep at all really I'm in Perfect Health and Dr. Ronnie, he used to be your Doctor now he's your Congressman in the Great State of Texas, I love Texas, and he said my body is in Incredible Shape, he told me I was very Strong, very Youthful, and probably at Genius Levels, nobody's ever Aced the Presidential Test besides me, Obama wouldn't even take it and yet I got 100 Percent plus Bonus Points, nobody's ever seen it that good not even any of the Medical Doctors and Scientists around the World they couldn't believe it, \"Sir, you're smarter than Albert Einstein and a lot better looking,\" I'm like the Robert Redford of smart people but the Fake News won't give me Credit for it. they have a Museum just for George Washington's Wooden Teeth but the Radical Left won't even let me put up a Statue to honor America's Favorite President, which is you're thinking me I hope, and as I've said many times Promises Made Promises Kept. you don't get that with Democrats, you only get Sadness and Defeat because they hate helping people and My Tax Plan, which was incredible by the way the numbers were through the roof but now they wanna take it all away, Sleepy Joe and the Democrats want to make your Taxes go up and the value of your Home go down. we may as well be living in Mexico that's how bad it's gotten.",
">\n\nNo reason it should. The Afghan withdrawal went smoothly and as planned.\nBiden extended the Trump surrender agreement to the Kaliban to give Afghans even more time and Taliban stuck to the agreement and didn't attack US troops.\nThe Afghans who flooded the airport were people who Biden had been given an extra six months to get out. They made a poor decision. Many had actually gone back to Afghanistan and got caught by the totally predictable collapse of the US back warlords. Trump had long ago abandoned any Afghans employed by US."
] |
>
It was. Multiple times. Date kept being pushed back.
Even Trump said they will be home by Christmas. Proceeds not to and delays it.
Things fell apart so quickly. There was nothing holding that country together beyond our US military.
Happened in Iraq. Happened again in Afghanistan, even when we stayed longer.
|
[
"That’s the difference between him & trump. Trump would go to sleep with a smile on his face thinking of how he “beat” those afghans",
">\n\nHow Trump broke the system that offers protection to Afghan allies The number of SIVs issued dropped by the hundreds. Iraqi SIVs fell from 557 in 2017 to 152 in 2019; the number of Afghan SIVs went from 4,120 in 2017 to 1,799 in 2020, as the number of applicants ballooned.\nThe processing time for Afghan SIV applicants in early 2021 reached 703 days.",
">\n\n\nWhipple wrote that former White House press secretary [Jen Psaki ] told him that Biden “over the next couple of days ... just felt a deep, misunderstood sadness.” \n\nThis goes to show you how much personal responsibility he takes into the decisions he makes. I'm glad we have a Commander in Chief like that.",
">\n\nWe can go on and on about the good and the bad of any administration, but this is the best move any president has made in my lifetime and I will make sure I give it appropriate recognition.\nAnd he knew the gravity of the situation - all the more credit\nWell done.",
">\n\nTrump made the deal/decision though, Biden followed through with it.",
">\n\nTrump had four years to leave Afghanistan and Biden had every opportunity to stay.",
">\n\nObama had eight years to leave.",
">\n\nYes, he's also to blame.",
">\n\nJoe Biden has a conscience. He feels empathy for others and he has the ability to recognize mistakes and learn from them. That is a good thing. \nThe Afghan withdrawal was set up for failure and there wasn't a hell of a lot that could be done about it, especially with the inaccurate intel he had available. Nonetheless, Biden took responsibility as the Commander in Chief. That's my President.",
">\n\nOh shit! What’s that called??? Hold on, I’m thinking… oh yeah, Empathy?",
">\n\nI will throw thay orange turd one atom of a crumb.\nDespite Trump setting it up to be chaotic.\nI think it was a doomed pull out no matter who would of been president.\nShit isn't always easy.",
">\n\nMaybe, but Trump also freed 5000 Taliban prisoners, so he actively made the situation worse.",
">\n\nYeah agreed.\nIf trump actually won a second term. Would he have even pulled out? \nWould we be bitching at how he fucked it up instead of the right bitching(in bad faith.) at Joe biden.\n(Not trying to bother sides anything incase my post.sounds like it. More like shoe on other foot.)",
">\n\nI wonder this too. Would Trump 2 have found some reason to increase the number of American soldiers in Afghanistan? Obama had that problem... I'm sure Obama wanted to get out of Afghanistan, but instead he prolonged the misery. All with best intentions, of course.",
">\n\nNo Trump's agreement gave him no option but to pull out. Don't let anyone kid you that we were going to stay. Our allies, at minimum, would have left and that would have put additional pressure on US forces. After action reports indicated the already shaky Afghan government we setup was seen as illegitimate when Trump released those 5k Taliban fighters. The ANA were all getting the best deals they possibly could from that point forward.",
">\n\nGetting out of Afghanistan was always going to be a shit show considering trump intentionally left it as a minefield for Biden. trump didn't assist any Afghanis in leaving the country and the Biden admin helped evacuate over 100K people in a short period of time. There was no way of stopping a suicide bomber in the midst of that chaos.",
">\n\nI tried explaining this to a coworker. He was like Biden didn't give a shit and said fuck all those people. Like if that had been Trump you would be singing a different tune. I said, \"Well what about who made the deal in the first place?\" The response, \"Well Trump had a plan.\" To which I responded, \"Oh like his Covid plan? Or medical care plan? Say he has it and does fuck all.\" These people will defend anything.",
">\n\nThere was no good way to leave Afghanistan. Period. Not his fault.",
">\n\nand I would've never lost not even one second of sleep, because I don't need to sleep at all really I'm in Perfect Health and Dr. Ronnie, he used to be your Doctor now he's your Congressman in the Great State of Texas, I love Texas, and he said my body is in Incredible Shape, he told me I was very Strong, very Youthful, and probably at Genius Levels, nobody's ever Aced the Presidential Test besides me, Obama wouldn't even take it and yet I got 100 Percent plus Bonus Points, nobody's ever seen it that good not even any of the Medical Doctors and Scientists around the World they couldn't believe it, \"Sir, you're smarter than Albert Einstein and a lot better looking,\" I'm like the Robert Redford of smart people but the Fake News won't give me Credit for it. they have a Museum just for George Washington's Wooden Teeth but the Radical Left won't even let me put up a Statue to honor America's Favorite President, which is you're thinking me I hope, and as I've said many times Promises Made Promises Kept. you don't get that with Democrats, you only get Sadness and Defeat because they hate helping people and My Tax Plan, which was incredible by the way the numbers were through the roof but now they wanna take it all away, Sleepy Joe and the Democrats want to make your Taxes go up and the value of your Home go down. we may as well be living in Mexico that's how bad it's gotten.",
">\n\nNo reason it should. The Afghan withdrawal went smoothly and as planned.\nBiden extended the Trump surrender agreement to the Kaliban to give Afghans even more time and Taliban stuck to the agreement and didn't attack US troops.\nThe Afghans who flooded the airport were people who Biden had been given an extra six months to get out. They made a poor decision. Many had actually gone back to Afghanistan and got caught by the totally predictable collapse of the US back warlords. Trump had long ago abandoned any Afghans employed by US.",
">\n\nI’m voting for him again, but this was deeply disappointing and I don’t buy that he was surprised about the Afghan forces crumbling so quickly.\nWe needed to exit, but why couldn’t the withdrawal have been slowed down?"
] |
>
The delays obviously signaled something was very wrong. And maybe we had a responsibility to those people after misdirecting our anger at their country.
Like I said, I’m still voting for Biden. But I lose some respect for him with this specific story, which now comes off as PR trying to make him seem human and fatherly, like he didn’t know.
|
[
"That’s the difference between him & trump. Trump would go to sleep with a smile on his face thinking of how he “beat” those afghans",
">\n\nHow Trump broke the system that offers protection to Afghan allies The number of SIVs issued dropped by the hundreds. Iraqi SIVs fell from 557 in 2017 to 152 in 2019; the number of Afghan SIVs went from 4,120 in 2017 to 1,799 in 2020, as the number of applicants ballooned.\nThe processing time for Afghan SIV applicants in early 2021 reached 703 days.",
">\n\n\nWhipple wrote that former White House press secretary [Jen Psaki ] told him that Biden “over the next couple of days ... just felt a deep, misunderstood sadness.” \n\nThis goes to show you how much personal responsibility he takes into the decisions he makes. I'm glad we have a Commander in Chief like that.",
">\n\nWe can go on and on about the good and the bad of any administration, but this is the best move any president has made in my lifetime and I will make sure I give it appropriate recognition.\nAnd he knew the gravity of the situation - all the more credit\nWell done.",
">\n\nTrump made the deal/decision though, Biden followed through with it.",
">\n\nTrump had four years to leave Afghanistan and Biden had every opportunity to stay.",
">\n\nObama had eight years to leave.",
">\n\nYes, he's also to blame.",
">\n\nJoe Biden has a conscience. He feels empathy for others and he has the ability to recognize mistakes and learn from them. That is a good thing. \nThe Afghan withdrawal was set up for failure and there wasn't a hell of a lot that could be done about it, especially with the inaccurate intel he had available. Nonetheless, Biden took responsibility as the Commander in Chief. That's my President.",
">\n\nOh shit! What’s that called??? Hold on, I’m thinking… oh yeah, Empathy?",
">\n\nI will throw thay orange turd one atom of a crumb.\nDespite Trump setting it up to be chaotic.\nI think it was a doomed pull out no matter who would of been president.\nShit isn't always easy.",
">\n\nMaybe, but Trump also freed 5000 Taliban prisoners, so he actively made the situation worse.",
">\n\nYeah agreed.\nIf trump actually won a second term. Would he have even pulled out? \nWould we be bitching at how he fucked it up instead of the right bitching(in bad faith.) at Joe biden.\n(Not trying to bother sides anything incase my post.sounds like it. More like shoe on other foot.)",
">\n\nI wonder this too. Would Trump 2 have found some reason to increase the number of American soldiers in Afghanistan? Obama had that problem... I'm sure Obama wanted to get out of Afghanistan, but instead he prolonged the misery. All with best intentions, of course.",
">\n\nNo Trump's agreement gave him no option but to pull out. Don't let anyone kid you that we were going to stay. Our allies, at minimum, would have left and that would have put additional pressure on US forces. After action reports indicated the already shaky Afghan government we setup was seen as illegitimate when Trump released those 5k Taliban fighters. The ANA were all getting the best deals they possibly could from that point forward.",
">\n\nGetting out of Afghanistan was always going to be a shit show considering trump intentionally left it as a minefield for Biden. trump didn't assist any Afghanis in leaving the country and the Biden admin helped evacuate over 100K people in a short period of time. There was no way of stopping a suicide bomber in the midst of that chaos.",
">\n\nI tried explaining this to a coworker. He was like Biden didn't give a shit and said fuck all those people. Like if that had been Trump you would be singing a different tune. I said, \"Well what about who made the deal in the first place?\" The response, \"Well Trump had a plan.\" To which I responded, \"Oh like his Covid plan? Or medical care plan? Say he has it and does fuck all.\" These people will defend anything.",
">\n\nThere was no good way to leave Afghanistan. Period. Not his fault.",
">\n\nand I would've never lost not even one second of sleep, because I don't need to sleep at all really I'm in Perfect Health and Dr. Ronnie, he used to be your Doctor now he's your Congressman in the Great State of Texas, I love Texas, and he said my body is in Incredible Shape, he told me I was very Strong, very Youthful, and probably at Genius Levels, nobody's ever Aced the Presidential Test besides me, Obama wouldn't even take it and yet I got 100 Percent plus Bonus Points, nobody's ever seen it that good not even any of the Medical Doctors and Scientists around the World they couldn't believe it, \"Sir, you're smarter than Albert Einstein and a lot better looking,\" I'm like the Robert Redford of smart people but the Fake News won't give me Credit for it. they have a Museum just for George Washington's Wooden Teeth but the Radical Left won't even let me put up a Statue to honor America's Favorite President, which is you're thinking me I hope, and as I've said many times Promises Made Promises Kept. you don't get that with Democrats, you only get Sadness and Defeat because they hate helping people and My Tax Plan, which was incredible by the way the numbers were through the roof but now they wanna take it all away, Sleepy Joe and the Democrats want to make your Taxes go up and the value of your Home go down. we may as well be living in Mexico that's how bad it's gotten.",
">\n\nNo reason it should. The Afghan withdrawal went smoothly and as planned.\nBiden extended the Trump surrender agreement to the Kaliban to give Afghans even more time and Taliban stuck to the agreement and didn't attack US troops.\nThe Afghans who flooded the airport were people who Biden had been given an extra six months to get out. They made a poor decision. Many had actually gone back to Afghanistan and got caught by the totally predictable collapse of the US back warlords. Trump had long ago abandoned any Afghans employed by US.",
">\n\nI’m voting for him again, but this was deeply disappointing and I don’t buy that he was surprised about the Afghan forces crumbling so quickly.\nWe needed to exit, but why couldn’t the withdrawal have been slowed down?",
">\n\nIt was. Multiple times. Date kept being pushed back.\nEven Trump said they will be home by Christmas. Proceeds not to and delays it.\nThings fell apart so quickly. There was nothing holding that country together beyond our US military.\nHappened in Iraq. Happened again in Afghanistan, even when we stayed longer."
] |
>
We'd, we'll, always be responsible. 20 years is a long time and the Afghans have a rich history of blood.
Russia, the UK, several Middle-Eastern countries all owe.
The most responsible thing we could do is leave. We should've never went in the first place and the more we tried to solve the problem, the worse it became.
|
[
"That’s the difference between him & trump. Trump would go to sleep with a smile on his face thinking of how he “beat” those afghans",
">\n\nHow Trump broke the system that offers protection to Afghan allies The number of SIVs issued dropped by the hundreds. Iraqi SIVs fell from 557 in 2017 to 152 in 2019; the number of Afghan SIVs went from 4,120 in 2017 to 1,799 in 2020, as the number of applicants ballooned.\nThe processing time for Afghan SIV applicants in early 2021 reached 703 days.",
">\n\n\nWhipple wrote that former White House press secretary [Jen Psaki ] told him that Biden “over the next couple of days ... just felt a deep, misunderstood sadness.” \n\nThis goes to show you how much personal responsibility he takes into the decisions he makes. I'm glad we have a Commander in Chief like that.",
">\n\nWe can go on and on about the good and the bad of any administration, but this is the best move any president has made in my lifetime and I will make sure I give it appropriate recognition.\nAnd he knew the gravity of the situation - all the more credit\nWell done.",
">\n\nTrump made the deal/decision though, Biden followed through with it.",
">\n\nTrump had four years to leave Afghanistan and Biden had every opportunity to stay.",
">\n\nObama had eight years to leave.",
">\n\nYes, he's also to blame.",
">\n\nJoe Biden has a conscience. He feels empathy for others and he has the ability to recognize mistakes and learn from them. That is a good thing. \nThe Afghan withdrawal was set up for failure and there wasn't a hell of a lot that could be done about it, especially with the inaccurate intel he had available. Nonetheless, Biden took responsibility as the Commander in Chief. That's my President.",
">\n\nOh shit! What’s that called??? Hold on, I’m thinking… oh yeah, Empathy?",
">\n\nI will throw thay orange turd one atom of a crumb.\nDespite Trump setting it up to be chaotic.\nI think it was a doomed pull out no matter who would of been president.\nShit isn't always easy.",
">\n\nMaybe, but Trump also freed 5000 Taliban prisoners, so he actively made the situation worse.",
">\n\nYeah agreed.\nIf trump actually won a second term. Would he have even pulled out? \nWould we be bitching at how he fucked it up instead of the right bitching(in bad faith.) at Joe biden.\n(Not trying to bother sides anything incase my post.sounds like it. More like shoe on other foot.)",
">\n\nI wonder this too. Would Trump 2 have found some reason to increase the number of American soldiers in Afghanistan? Obama had that problem... I'm sure Obama wanted to get out of Afghanistan, but instead he prolonged the misery. All with best intentions, of course.",
">\n\nNo Trump's agreement gave him no option but to pull out. Don't let anyone kid you that we were going to stay. Our allies, at minimum, would have left and that would have put additional pressure on US forces. After action reports indicated the already shaky Afghan government we setup was seen as illegitimate when Trump released those 5k Taliban fighters. The ANA were all getting the best deals they possibly could from that point forward.",
">\n\nGetting out of Afghanistan was always going to be a shit show considering trump intentionally left it as a minefield for Biden. trump didn't assist any Afghanis in leaving the country and the Biden admin helped evacuate over 100K people in a short period of time. There was no way of stopping a suicide bomber in the midst of that chaos.",
">\n\nI tried explaining this to a coworker. He was like Biden didn't give a shit and said fuck all those people. Like if that had been Trump you would be singing a different tune. I said, \"Well what about who made the deal in the first place?\" The response, \"Well Trump had a plan.\" To which I responded, \"Oh like his Covid plan? Or medical care plan? Say he has it and does fuck all.\" These people will defend anything.",
">\n\nThere was no good way to leave Afghanistan. Period. Not his fault.",
">\n\nand I would've never lost not even one second of sleep, because I don't need to sleep at all really I'm in Perfect Health and Dr. Ronnie, he used to be your Doctor now he's your Congressman in the Great State of Texas, I love Texas, and he said my body is in Incredible Shape, he told me I was very Strong, very Youthful, and probably at Genius Levels, nobody's ever Aced the Presidential Test besides me, Obama wouldn't even take it and yet I got 100 Percent plus Bonus Points, nobody's ever seen it that good not even any of the Medical Doctors and Scientists around the World they couldn't believe it, \"Sir, you're smarter than Albert Einstein and a lot better looking,\" I'm like the Robert Redford of smart people but the Fake News won't give me Credit for it. they have a Museum just for George Washington's Wooden Teeth but the Radical Left won't even let me put up a Statue to honor America's Favorite President, which is you're thinking me I hope, and as I've said many times Promises Made Promises Kept. you don't get that with Democrats, you only get Sadness and Defeat because they hate helping people and My Tax Plan, which was incredible by the way the numbers were through the roof but now they wanna take it all away, Sleepy Joe and the Democrats want to make your Taxes go up and the value of your Home go down. we may as well be living in Mexico that's how bad it's gotten.",
">\n\nNo reason it should. The Afghan withdrawal went smoothly and as planned.\nBiden extended the Trump surrender agreement to the Kaliban to give Afghans even more time and Taliban stuck to the agreement and didn't attack US troops.\nThe Afghans who flooded the airport were people who Biden had been given an extra six months to get out. They made a poor decision. Many had actually gone back to Afghanistan and got caught by the totally predictable collapse of the US back warlords. Trump had long ago abandoned any Afghans employed by US.",
">\n\nI’m voting for him again, but this was deeply disappointing and I don’t buy that he was surprised about the Afghan forces crumbling so quickly.\nWe needed to exit, but why couldn’t the withdrawal have been slowed down?",
">\n\nIt was. Multiple times. Date kept being pushed back.\nEven Trump said they will be home by Christmas. Proceeds not to and delays it.\nThings fell apart so quickly. There was nothing holding that country together beyond our US military.\nHappened in Iraq. Happened again in Afghanistan, even when we stayed longer.",
">\n\nThe delays obviously signaled something was very wrong. And maybe we had a responsibility to those people after misdirecting our anger at their country. \nLike I said, I’m still voting for Biden. But I lose some respect for him with this specific story, which now comes off as PR trying to make him seem human and fatherly, like he didn’t know."
] |
>
Or he dropped it in a heartbeat when the chance for a proxy war with Russia came along?
People are really speculating about his feelings and empathy? How about the war in Yemen? Or mbs getting immunity after he promised to make the saudis a pariah state?
He doesn't give a fuck about the people of afghanistan, ukraine, yemen, or america. Corporate donors and political friends are who he is appeasing.
|
[
"That’s the difference between him & trump. Trump would go to sleep with a smile on his face thinking of how he “beat” those afghans",
">\n\nHow Trump broke the system that offers protection to Afghan allies The number of SIVs issued dropped by the hundreds. Iraqi SIVs fell from 557 in 2017 to 152 in 2019; the number of Afghan SIVs went from 4,120 in 2017 to 1,799 in 2020, as the number of applicants ballooned.\nThe processing time for Afghan SIV applicants in early 2021 reached 703 days.",
">\n\n\nWhipple wrote that former White House press secretary [Jen Psaki ] told him that Biden “over the next couple of days ... just felt a deep, misunderstood sadness.” \n\nThis goes to show you how much personal responsibility he takes into the decisions he makes. I'm glad we have a Commander in Chief like that.",
">\n\nWe can go on and on about the good and the bad of any administration, but this is the best move any president has made in my lifetime and I will make sure I give it appropriate recognition.\nAnd he knew the gravity of the situation - all the more credit\nWell done.",
">\n\nTrump made the deal/decision though, Biden followed through with it.",
">\n\nTrump had four years to leave Afghanistan and Biden had every opportunity to stay.",
">\n\nObama had eight years to leave.",
">\n\nYes, he's also to blame.",
">\n\nJoe Biden has a conscience. He feels empathy for others and he has the ability to recognize mistakes and learn from them. That is a good thing. \nThe Afghan withdrawal was set up for failure and there wasn't a hell of a lot that could be done about it, especially with the inaccurate intel he had available. Nonetheless, Biden took responsibility as the Commander in Chief. That's my President.",
">\n\nOh shit! What’s that called??? Hold on, I’m thinking… oh yeah, Empathy?",
">\n\nI will throw thay orange turd one atom of a crumb.\nDespite Trump setting it up to be chaotic.\nI think it was a doomed pull out no matter who would of been president.\nShit isn't always easy.",
">\n\nMaybe, but Trump also freed 5000 Taliban prisoners, so he actively made the situation worse.",
">\n\nYeah agreed.\nIf trump actually won a second term. Would he have even pulled out? \nWould we be bitching at how he fucked it up instead of the right bitching(in bad faith.) at Joe biden.\n(Not trying to bother sides anything incase my post.sounds like it. More like shoe on other foot.)",
">\n\nI wonder this too. Would Trump 2 have found some reason to increase the number of American soldiers in Afghanistan? Obama had that problem... I'm sure Obama wanted to get out of Afghanistan, but instead he prolonged the misery. All with best intentions, of course.",
">\n\nNo Trump's agreement gave him no option but to pull out. Don't let anyone kid you that we were going to stay. Our allies, at minimum, would have left and that would have put additional pressure on US forces. After action reports indicated the already shaky Afghan government we setup was seen as illegitimate when Trump released those 5k Taliban fighters. The ANA were all getting the best deals they possibly could from that point forward.",
">\n\nGetting out of Afghanistan was always going to be a shit show considering trump intentionally left it as a minefield for Biden. trump didn't assist any Afghanis in leaving the country and the Biden admin helped evacuate over 100K people in a short period of time. There was no way of stopping a suicide bomber in the midst of that chaos.",
">\n\nI tried explaining this to a coworker. He was like Biden didn't give a shit and said fuck all those people. Like if that had been Trump you would be singing a different tune. I said, \"Well what about who made the deal in the first place?\" The response, \"Well Trump had a plan.\" To which I responded, \"Oh like his Covid plan? Or medical care plan? Say he has it and does fuck all.\" These people will defend anything.",
">\n\nThere was no good way to leave Afghanistan. Period. Not his fault.",
">\n\nand I would've never lost not even one second of sleep, because I don't need to sleep at all really I'm in Perfect Health and Dr. Ronnie, he used to be your Doctor now he's your Congressman in the Great State of Texas, I love Texas, and he said my body is in Incredible Shape, he told me I was very Strong, very Youthful, and probably at Genius Levels, nobody's ever Aced the Presidential Test besides me, Obama wouldn't even take it and yet I got 100 Percent plus Bonus Points, nobody's ever seen it that good not even any of the Medical Doctors and Scientists around the World they couldn't believe it, \"Sir, you're smarter than Albert Einstein and a lot better looking,\" I'm like the Robert Redford of smart people but the Fake News won't give me Credit for it. they have a Museum just for George Washington's Wooden Teeth but the Radical Left won't even let me put up a Statue to honor America's Favorite President, which is you're thinking me I hope, and as I've said many times Promises Made Promises Kept. you don't get that with Democrats, you only get Sadness and Defeat because they hate helping people and My Tax Plan, which was incredible by the way the numbers were through the roof but now they wanna take it all away, Sleepy Joe and the Democrats want to make your Taxes go up and the value of your Home go down. we may as well be living in Mexico that's how bad it's gotten.",
">\n\nNo reason it should. The Afghan withdrawal went smoothly and as planned.\nBiden extended the Trump surrender agreement to the Kaliban to give Afghans even more time and Taliban stuck to the agreement and didn't attack US troops.\nThe Afghans who flooded the airport were people who Biden had been given an extra six months to get out. They made a poor decision. Many had actually gone back to Afghanistan and got caught by the totally predictable collapse of the US back warlords. Trump had long ago abandoned any Afghans employed by US.",
">\n\nI’m voting for him again, but this was deeply disappointing and I don’t buy that he was surprised about the Afghan forces crumbling so quickly.\nWe needed to exit, but why couldn’t the withdrawal have been slowed down?",
">\n\nIt was. Multiple times. Date kept being pushed back.\nEven Trump said they will be home by Christmas. Proceeds not to and delays it.\nThings fell apart so quickly. There was nothing holding that country together beyond our US military.\nHappened in Iraq. Happened again in Afghanistan, even when we stayed longer.",
">\n\nThe delays obviously signaled something was very wrong. And maybe we had a responsibility to those people after misdirecting our anger at their country. \nLike I said, I’m still voting for Biden. But I lose some respect for him with this specific story, which now comes off as PR trying to make him seem human and fatherly, like he didn’t know.",
">\n\nWe'd, we'll, always be responsible. 20 years is a long time and the Afghans have a rich history of blood.\nRussia, the UK, several Middle-Eastern countries all owe.\nThe most responsible thing we could do is leave. We should've never went in the first place and the more we tried to solve the problem, the worse it became."
] |
>
You can say a lot of things about Joe Biden. But you cant say he isn't an empathic guy.
What is he supposed to do in Yemen??? He's doing a great job in Ukraine. Not a single American soldier has been killed or harmed, and russia could leave tomorrow, say some "our bad, won't happen again" and be fine in 2 years, but they are too stupid, so they won't.
|
[
"That’s the difference between him & trump. Trump would go to sleep with a smile on his face thinking of how he “beat” those afghans",
">\n\nHow Trump broke the system that offers protection to Afghan allies The number of SIVs issued dropped by the hundreds. Iraqi SIVs fell from 557 in 2017 to 152 in 2019; the number of Afghan SIVs went from 4,120 in 2017 to 1,799 in 2020, as the number of applicants ballooned.\nThe processing time for Afghan SIV applicants in early 2021 reached 703 days.",
">\n\n\nWhipple wrote that former White House press secretary [Jen Psaki ] told him that Biden “over the next couple of days ... just felt a deep, misunderstood sadness.” \n\nThis goes to show you how much personal responsibility he takes into the decisions he makes. I'm glad we have a Commander in Chief like that.",
">\n\nWe can go on and on about the good and the bad of any administration, but this is the best move any president has made in my lifetime and I will make sure I give it appropriate recognition.\nAnd he knew the gravity of the situation - all the more credit\nWell done.",
">\n\nTrump made the deal/decision though, Biden followed through with it.",
">\n\nTrump had four years to leave Afghanistan and Biden had every opportunity to stay.",
">\n\nObama had eight years to leave.",
">\n\nYes, he's also to blame.",
">\n\nJoe Biden has a conscience. He feels empathy for others and he has the ability to recognize mistakes and learn from them. That is a good thing. \nThe Afghan withdrawal was set up for failure and there wasn't a hell of a lot that could be done about it, especially with the inaccurate intel he had available. Nonetheless, Biden took responsibility as the Commander in Chief. That's my President.",
">\n\nOh shit! What’s that called??? Hold on, I’m thinking… oh yeah, Empathy?",
">\n\nI will throw thay orange turd one atom of a crumb.\nDespite Trump setting it up to be chaotic.\nI think it was a doomed pull out no matter who would of been president.\nShit isn't always easy.",
">\n\nMaybe, but Trump also freed 5000 Taliban prisoners, so he actively made the situation worse.",
">\n\nYeah agreed.\nIf trump actually won a second term. Would he have even pulled out? \nWould we be bitching at how he fucked it up instead of the right bitching(in bad faith.) at Joe biden.\n(Not trying to bother sides anything incase my post.sounds like it. More like shoe on other foot.)",
">\n\nI wonder this too. Would Trump 2 have found some reason to increase the number of American soldiers in Afghanistan? Obama had that problem... I'm sure Obama wanted to get out of Afghanistan, but instead he prolonged the misery. All with best intentions, of course.",
">\n\nNo Trump's agreement gave him no option but to pull out. Don't let anyone kid you that we were going to stay. Our allies, at minimum, would have left and that would have put additional pressure on US forces. After action reports indicated the already shaky Afghan government we setup was seen as illegitimate when Trump released those 5k Taliban fighters. The ANA were all getting the best deals they possibly could from that point forward.",
">\n\nGetting out of Afghanistan was always going to be a shit show considering trump intentionally left it as a minefield for Biden. trump didn't assist any Afghanis in leaving the country and the Biden admin helped evacuate over 100K people in a short period of time. There was no way of stopping a suicide bomber in the midst of that chaos.",
">\n\nI tried explaining this to a coworker. He was like Biden didn't give a shit and said fuck all those people. Like if that had been Trump you would be singing a different tune. I said, \"Well what about who made the deal in the first place?\" The response, \"Well Trump had a plan.\" To which I responded, \"Oh like his Covid plan? Or medical care plan? Say he has it and does fuck all.\" These people will defend anything.",
">\n\nThere was no good way to leave Afghanistan. Period. Not his fault.",
">\n\nand I would've never lost not even one second of sleep, because I don't need to sleep at all really I'm in Perfect Health and Dr. Ronnie, he used to be your Doctor now he's your Congressman in the Great State of Texas, I love Texas, and he said my body is in Incredible Shape, he told me I was very Strong, very Youthful, and probably at Genius Levels, nobody's ever Aced the Presidential Test besides me, Obama wouldn't even take it and yet I got 100 Percent plus Bonus Points, nobody's ever seen it that good not even any of the Medical Doctors and Scientists around the World they couldn't believe it, \"Sir, you're smarter than Albert Einstein and a lot better looking,\" I'm like the Robert Redford of smart people but the Fake News won't give me Credit for it. they have a Museum just for George Washington's Wooden Teeth but the Radical Left won't even let me put up a Statue to honor America's Favorite President, which is you're thinking me I hope, and as I've said many times Promises Made Promises Kept. you don't get that with Democrats, you only get Sadness and Defeat because they hate helping people and My Tax Plan, which was incredible by the way the numbers were through the roof but now they wanna take it all away, Sleepy Joe and the Democrats want to make your Taxes go up and the value of your Home go down. we may as well be living in Mexico that's how bad it's gotten.",
">\n\nNo reason it should. The Afghan withdrawal went smoothly and as planned.\nBiden extended the Trump surrender agreement to the Kaliban to give Afghans even more time and Taliban stuck to the agreement and didn't attack US troops.\nThe Afghans who flooded the airport were people who Biden had been given an extra six months to get out. They made a poor decision. Many had actually gone back to Afghanistan and got caught by the totally predictable collapse of the US back warlords. Trump had long ago abandoned any Afghans employed by US.",
">\n\nI’m voting for him again, but this was deeply disappointing and I don’t buy that he was surprised about the Afghan forces crumbling so quickly.\nWe needed to exit, but why couldn’t the withdrawal have been slowed down?",
">\n\nIt was. Multiple times. Date kept being pushed back.\nEven Trump said they will be home by Christmas. Proceeds not to and delays it.\nThings fell apart so quickly. There was nothing holding that country together beyond our US military.\nHappened in Iraq. Happened again in Afghanistan, even when we stayed longer.",
">\n\nThe delays obviously signaled something was very wrong. And maybe we had a responsibility to those people after misdirecting our anger at their country. \nLike I said, I’m still voting for Biden. But I lose some respect for him with this specific story, which now comes off as PR trying to make him seem human and fatherly, like he didn’t know.",
">\n\nWe'd, we'll, always be responsible. 20 years is a long time and the Afghans have a rich history of blood.\nRussia, the UK, several Middle-Eastern countries all owe.\nThe most responsible thing we could do is leave. We should've never went in the first place and the more we tried to solve the problem, the worse it became.",
">\n\nOr he dropped it in a heartbeat when the chance for a proxy war with Russia came along? \nPeople are really speculating about his feelings and empathy? How about the war in Yemen? Or mbs getting immunity after he promised to make the saudis a pariah state? \nHe doesn't give a fuck about the people of afghanistan, ukraine, yemen, or america. Corporate donors and political friends are who he is appeasing."
] |
>
|
[
"That’s the difference between him & trump. Trump would go to sleep with a smile on his face thinking of how he “beat” those afghans",
">\n\nHow Trump broke the system that offers protection to Afghan allies The number of SIVs issued dropped by the hundreds. Iraqi SIVs fell from 557 in 2017 to 152 in 2019; the number of Afghan SIVs went from 4,120 in 2017 to 1,799 in 2020, as the number of applicants ballooned.\nThe processing time for Afghan SIV applicants in early 2021 reached 703 days.",
">\n\n\nWhipple wrote that former White House press secretary [Jen Psaki ] told him that Biden “over the next couple of days ... just felt a deep, misunderstood sadness.” \n\nThis goes to show you how much personal responsibility he takes into the decisions he makes. I'm glad we have a Commander in Chief like that.",
">\n\nWe can go on and on about the good and the bad of any administration, but this is the best move any president has made in my lifetime and I will make sure I give it appropriate recognition.\nAnd he knew the gravity of the situation - all the more credit\nWell done.",
">\n\nTrump made the deal/decision though, Biden followed through with it.",
">\n\nTrump had four years to leave Afghanistan and Biden had every opportunity to stay.",
">\n\nObama had eight years to leave.",
">\n\nYes, he's also to blame.",
">\n\nJoe Biden has a conscience. He feels empathy for others and he has the ability to recognize mistakes and learn from them. That is a good thing. \nThe Afghan withdrawal was set up for failure and there wasn't a hell of a lot that could be done about it, especially with the inaccurate intel he had available. Nonetheless, Biden took responsibility as the Commander in Chief. That's my President.",
">\n\nOh shit! What’s that called??? Hold on, I’m thinking… oh yeah, Empathy?",
">\n\nI will throw thay orange turd one atom of a crumb.\nDespite Trump setting it up to be chaotic.\nI think it was a doomed pull out no matter who would of been president.\nShit isn't always easy.",
">\n\nMaybe, but Trump also freed 5000 Taliban prisoners, so he actively made the situation worse.",
">\n\nYeah agreed.\nIf trump actually won a second term. Would he have even pulled out? \nWould we be bitching at how he fucked it up instead of the right bitching(in bad faith.) at Joe biden.\n(Not trying to bother sides anything incase my post.sounds like it. More like shoe on other foot.)",
">\n\nI wonder this too. Would Trump 2 have found some reason to increase the number of American soldiers in Afghanistan? Obama had that problem... I'm sure Obama wanted to get out of Afghanistan, but instead he prolonged the misery. All with best intentions, of course.",
">\n\nNo Trump's agreement gave him no option but to pull out. Don't let anyone kid you that we were going to stay. Our allies, at minimum, would have left and that would have put additional pressure on US forces. After action reports indicated the already shaky Afghan government we setup was seen as illegitimate when Trump released those 5k Taliban fighters. The ANA were all getting the best deals they possibly could from that point forward.",
">\n\nGetting out of Afghanistan was always going to be a shit show considering trump intentionally left it as a minefield for Biden. trump didn't assist any Afghanis in leaving the country and the Biden admin helped evacuate over 100K people in a short period of time. There was no way of stopping a suicide bomber in the midst of that chaos.",
">\n\nI tried explaining this to a coworker. He was like Biden didn't give a shit and said fuck all those people. Like if that had been Trump you would be singing a different tune. I said, \"Well what about who made the deal in the first place?\" The response, \"Well Trump had a plan.\" To which I responded, \"Oh like his Covid plan? Or medical care plan? Say he has it and does fuck all.\" These people will defend anything.",
">\n\nThere was no good way to leave Afghanistan. Period. Not his fault.",
">\n\nand I would've never lost not even one second of sleep, because I don't need to sleep at all really I'm in Perfect Health and Dr. Ronnie, he used to be your Doctor now he's your Congressman in the Great State of Texas, I love Texas, and he said my body is in Incredible Shape, he told me I was very Strong, very Youthful, and probably at Genius Levels, nobody's ever Aced the Presidential Test besides me, Obama wouldn't even take it and yet I got 100 Percent plus Bonus Points, nobody's ever seen it that good not even any of the Medical Doctors and Scientists around the World they couldn't believe it, \"Sir, you're smarter than Albert Einstein and a lot better looking,\" I'm like the Robert Redford of smart people but the Fake News won't give me Credit for it. they have a Museum just for George Washington's Wooden Teeth but the Radical Left won't even let me put up a Statue to honor America's Favorite President, which is you're thinking me I hope, and as I've said many times Promises Made Promises Kept. you don't get that with Democrats, you only get Sadness and Defeat because they hate helping people and My Tax Plan, which was incredible by the way the numbers were through the roof but now they wanna take it all away, Sleepy Joe and the Democrats want to make your Taxes go up and the value of your Home go down. we may as well be living in Mexico that's how bad it's gotten.",
">\n\nNo reason it should. The Afghan withdrawal went smoothly and as planned.\nBiden extended the Trump surrender agreement to the Kaliban to give Afghans even more time and Taliban stuck to the agreement and didn't attack US troops.\nThe Afghans who flooded the airport were people who Biden had been given an extra six months to get out. They made a poor decision. Many had actually gone back to Afghanistan and got caught by the totally predictable collapse of the US back warlords. Trump had long ago abandoned any Afghans employed by US.",
">\n\nI’m voting for him again, but this was deeply disappointing and I don’t buy that he was surprised about the Afghan forces crumbling so quickly.\nWe needed to exit, but why couldn’t the withdrawal have been slowed down?",
">\n\nIt was. Multiple times. Date kept being pushed back.\nEven Trump said they will be home by Christmas. Proceeds not to and delays it.\nThings fell apart so quickly. There was nothing holding that country together beyond our US military.\nHappened in Iraq. Happened again in Afghanistan, even when we stayed longer.",
">\n\nThe delays obviously signaled something was very wrong. And maybe we had a responsibility to those people after misdirecting our anger at their country. \nLike I said, I’m still voting for Biden. But I lose some respect for him with this specific story, which now comes off as PR trying to make him seem human and fatherly, like he didn’t know.",
">\n\nWe'd, we'll, always be responsible. 20 years is a long time and the Afghans have a rich history of blood.\nRussia, the UK, several Middle-Eastern countries all owe.\nThe most responsible thing we could do is leave. We should've never went in the first place and the more we tried to solve the problem, the worse it became.",
">\n\nOr he dropped it in a heartbeat when the chance for a proxy war with Russia came along? \nPeople are really speculating about his feelings and empathy? How about the war in Yemen? Or mbs getting immunity after he promised to make the saudis a pariah state? \nHe doesn't give a fuck about the people of afghanistan, ukraine, yemen, or america. Corporate donors and political friends are who he is appeasing.",
">\n\nYou can say a lot of things about Joe Biden. But you cant say he isn't an empathic guy. \nWhat is he supposed to do in Yemen??? He's doing a great job in Ukraine. Not a single American soldier has been killed or harmed, and russia could leave tomorrow, say some \"our bad, won't happen again\" and be fine in 2 years, but they are too stupid, so they won't."
] |
It's only clear if one can prove they were originals, not copies. I'm all for holding them accountable but you toss the baby out with the bath water. Be rational and logical.
|
[] |
>
I’m sure they brunt copies because that’s what you do with incriminating evidence copy it and burn the copies. Jesus man.
|
[
"It's only clear if one can prove they were originals, not copies. I'm all for holding them accountable but you toss the baby out with the bath water. Be rational and logical."
] |
>
I'm just saying... rationally speaking, if you can't prove they were original documents, you cannot jump straight to "yep that's it, hang em". Are the odds good that they were originals? I'd say yes, but you have to prove it.
|
[
"It's only clear if one can prove they were originals, not copies. I'm all for holding them accountable but you toss the baby out with the bath water. Be rational and logical.",
">\n\nI’m sure they brunt copies because that’s what you do with incriminating evidence copy it and burn the copies. Jesus man."
] |
>
He was a participant in a criminal conspiracy and he burned documents I would vote to convict.
|
[
"It's only clear if one can prove they were originals, not copies. I'm all for holding them accountable but you toss the baby out with the bath water. Be rational and logical.",
">\n\nI’m sure they brunt copies because that’s what you do with incriminating evidence copy it and burn the copies. Jesus man.",
">\n\nI'm just saying... rationally speaking, if you can't prove they were original documents, you cannot jump straight to \"yep that's it, hang em\". Are the odds good that they were originals? I'd say yes, but you have to prove it."
] |
>
Without evidence? What you mentioned is circumstantial. If you're willing to convict someone of a specific crime without specific evidence to back it up, you're no better than they are. You would be acting on emotion and bias rather than evidence and proof. This is how lots of people end up locked up who are actually innocent of the crime in question because they are judged based on other behavior. That is not justice served.
|
[
"It's only clear if one can prove they were originals, not copies. I'm all for holding them accountable but you toss the baby out with the bath water. Be rational and logical.",
">\n\nI’m sure they brunt copies because that’s what you do with incriminating evidence copy it and burn the copies. Jesus man.",
">\n\nI'm just saying... rationally speaking, if you can't prove they were original documents, you cannot jump straight to \"yep that's it, hang em\". Are the odds good that they were originals? I'd say yes, but you have to prove it.",
">\n\nHe was a participant in a criminal conspiracy and he burned documents I would vote to convict."
] |
>
If you provably conspired to murder someone provably and we find human blood stains on your rug its ok to consider it further proof of the same crime we already proved.
There is ample evidence of the criminal conspiracy. There is no motivation in any possible universe where someone guilty of criminal conspiracy burns government documents and we believe that the governments were copies.
Please note the word reasonable in reasonable doubt.
|
[
"It's only clear if one can prove they were originals, not copies. I'm all for holding them accountable but you toss the baby out with the bath water. Be rational and logical.",
">\n\nI’m sure they brunt copies because that’s what you do with incriminating evidence copy it and burn the copies. Jesus man.",
">\n\nI'm just saying... rationally speaking, if you can't prove they were original documents, you cannot jump straight to \"yep that's it, hang em\". Are the odds good that they were originals? I'd say yes, but you have to prove it.",
">\n\nHe was a participant in a criminal conspiracy and he burned documents I would vote to convict.",
">\n\nWithout evidence? What you mentioned is circumstantial. If you're willing to convict someone of a specific crime without specific evidence to back it up, you're no better than they are. You would be acting on emotion and bias rather than evidence and proof. This is how lots of people end up locked up who are actually innocent of the crime in question because they are judged based on other behavior. That is not justice served."
] |
>
provably
Therein lies the problem
|
[
"It's only clear if one can prove they were originals, not copies. I'm all for holding them accountable but you toss the baby out with the bath water. Be rational and logical.",
">\n\nI’m sure they brunt copies because that’s what you do with incriminating evidence copy it and burn the copies. Jesus man.",
">\n\nI'm just saying... rationally speaking, if you can't prove they were original documents, you cannot jump straight to \"yep that's it, hang em\". Are the odds good that they were originals? I'd say yes, but you have to prove it.",
">\n\nHe was a participant in a criminal conspiracy and he burned documents I would vote to convict.",
">\n\nWithout evidence? What you mentioned is circumstantial. If you're willing to convict someone of a specific crime without specific evidence to back it up, you're no better than they are. You would be acting on emotion and bias rather than evidence and proof. This is how lots of people end up locked up who are actually innocent of the crime in question because they are judged based on other behavior. That is not justice served.",
">\n\nIf you provably conspired to murder someone provably and we find human blood stains on your rug its ok to consider it further proof of the same crime we already proved. \nThere is ample evidence of the criminal conspiracy. There is no motivation in any possible universe where someone guilty of criminal conspiracy burns government documents and we believe that the governments were copies.\nPlease note the word reasonable in reasonable doubt."
] |
>
We have ample evidence of conspiracy to subvert democracy
|
[
"It's only clear if one can prove they were originals, not copies. I'm all for holding them accountable but you toss the baby out with the bath water. Be rational and logical.",
">\n\nI’m sure they brunt copies because that’s what you do with incriminating evidence copy it and burn the copies. Jesus man.",
">\n\nI'm just saying... rationally speaking, if you can't prove they were original documents, you cannot jump straight to \"yep that's it, hang em\". Are the odds good that they were originals? I'd say yes, but you have to prove it.",
">\n\nHe was a participant in a criminal conspiracy and he burned documents I would vote to convict.",
">\n\nWithout evidence? What you mentioned is circumstantial. If you're willing to convict someone of a specific crime without specific evidence to back it up, you're no better than they are. You would be acting on emotion and bias rather than evidence and proof. This is how lots of people end up locked up who are actually innocent of the crime in question because they are judged based on other behavior. That is not justice served.",
">\n\nIf you provably conspired to murder someone provably and we find human blood stains on your rug its ok to consider it further proof of the same crime we already proved. \nThere is ample evidence of the criminal conspiracy. There is no motivation in any possible universe where someone guilty of criminal conspiracy burns government documents and we believe that the governments were copies.\nPlease note the word reasonable in reasonable doubt.",
">\n\n\nprovably\n\nTherein lies the problem"
] |
>
That's not what's being discussed. We're talking about Meadows burning documents.
|
[
"It's only clear if one can prove they were originals, not copies. I'm all for holding them accountable but you toss the baby out with the bath water. Be rational and logical.",
">\n\nI’m sure they brunt copies because that’s what you do with incriminating evidence copy it and burn the copies. Jesus man.",
">\n\nI'm just saying... rationally speaking, if you can't prove they were original documents, you cannot jump straight to \"yep that's it, hang em\". Are the odds good that they were originals? I'd say yes, but you have to prove it.",
">\n\nHe was a participant in a criminal conspiracy and he burned documents I would vote to convict.",
">\n\nWithout evidence? What you mentioned is circumstantial. If you're willing to convict someone of a specific crime without specific evidence to back it up, you're no better than they are. You would be acting on emotion and bias rather than evidence and proof. This is how lots of people end up locked up who are actually innocent of the crime in question because they are judged based on other behavior. That is not justice served.",
">\n\nIf you provably conspired to murder someone provably and we find human blood stains on your rug its ok to consider it further proof of the same crime we already proved. \nThere is ample evidence of the criminal conspiracy. There is no motivation in any possible universe where someone guilty of criminal conspiracy burns government documents and we believe that the governments were copies.\nPlease note the word reasonable in reasonable doubt.",
">\n\n\nprovably\n\nTherein lies the problem",
">\n\nWe have ample evidence of conspiracy to subvert democracy"
] |
>
Lock him up.
|
[
"It's only clear if one can prove they were originals, not copies. I'm all for holding them accountable but you toss the baby out with the bath water. Be rational and logical.",
">\n\nI’m sure they brunt copies because that’s what you do with incriminating evidence copy it and burn the copies. Jesus man.",
">\n\nI'm just saying... rationally speaking, if you can't prove they were original documents, you cannot jump straight to \"yep that's it, hang em\". Are the odds good that they were originals? I'd say yes, but you have to prove it.",
">\n\nHe was a participant in a criminal conspiracy and he burned documents I would vote to convict.",
">\n\nWithout evidence? What you mentioned is circumstantial. If you're willing to convict someone of a specific crime without specific evidence to back it up, you're no better than they are. You would be acting on emotion and bias rather than evidence and proof. This is how lots of people end up locked up who are actually innocent of the crime in question because they are judged based on other behavior. That is not justice served.",
">\n\nIf you provably conspired to murder someone provably and we find human blood stains on your rug its ok to consider it further proof of the same crime we already proved. \nThere is ample evidence of the criminal conspiracy. There is no motivation in any possible universe where someone guilty of criminal conspiracy burns government documents and we believe that the governments were copies.\nPlease note the word reasonable in reasonable doubt.",
">\n\n\nprovably\n\nTherein lies the problem",
">\n\nWe have ample evidence of conspiracy to subvert democracy",
">\n\nThat's not what's being discussed. We're talking about Meadows burning documents."
] |
>
Make sure he gets a prison cell with a low flow toilet. Those things piss him off
|
[
"It's only clear if one can prove they were originals, not copies. I'm all for holding them accountable but you toss the baby out with the bath water. Be rational and logical.",
">\n\nI’m sure they brunt copies because that’s what you do with incriminating evidence copy it and burn the copies. Jesus man.",
">\n\nI'm just saying... rationally speaking, if you can't prove they were original documents, you cannot jump straight to \"yep that's it, hang em\". Are the odds good that they were originals? I'd say yes, but you have to prove it.",
">\n\nHe was a participant in a criminal conspiracy and he burned documents I would vote to convict.",
">\n\nWithout evidence? What you mentioned is circumstantial. If you're willing to convict someone of a specific crime without specific evidence to back it up, you're no better than they are. You would be acting on emotion and bias rather than evidence and proof. This is how lots of people end up locked up who are actually innocent of the crime in question because they are judged based on other behavior. That is not justice served.",
">\n\nIf you provably conspired to murder someone provably and we find human blood stains on your rug its ok to consider it further proof of the same crime we already proved. \nThere is ample evidence of the criminal conspiracy. There is no motivation in any possible universe where someone guilty of criminal conspiracy burns government documents and we believe that the governments were copies.\nPlease note the word reasonable in reasonable doubt.",
">\n\n\nprovably\n\nTherein lies the problem",
">\n\nWe have ample evidence of conspiracy to subvert democracy",
">\n\nThat's not what's being discussed. We're talking about Meadows burning documents.",
">\n\nLock him up."
] |
>
Guys can't even courtesy flush because by the time they finally get that beefroll down the hatch, it's too late--the stink is everywhere by then. Not me, of course. But Bubba, next cell over--hooWEE! Let me tell you folks, it's true. This is America, can you believe it? Maybe it's fine in Gynna. Their poops are smaller, I guess. Short little people over there. Little people, little poops. And I don't like how you have to pull down the jumpsuit to drop a deuce, either. Everyone says I wear it well, though--the warden, the CO's. No one has ever looked more presidential in a jumpsuit, they say.
|
[
"It's only clear if one can prove they were originals, not copies. I'm all for holding them accountable but you toss the baby out with the bath water. Be rational and logical.",
">\n\nI’m sure they brunt copies because that’s what you do with incriminating evidence copy it and burn the copies. Jesus man.",
">\n\nI'm just saying... rationally speaking, if you can't prove they were original documents, you cannot jump straight to \"yep that's it, hang em\". Are the odds good that they were originals? I'd say yes, but you have to prove it.",
">\n\nHe was a participant in a criminal conspiracy and he burned documents I would vote to convict.",
">\n\nWithout evidence? What you mentioned is circumstantial. If you're willing to convict someone of a specific crime without specific evidence to back it up, you're no better than they are. You would be acting on emotion and bias rather than evidence and proof. This is how lots of people end up locked up who are actually innocent of the crime in question because they are judged based on other behavior. That is not justice served.",
">\n\nIf you provably conspired to murder someone provably and we find human blood stains on your rug its ok to consider it further proof of the same crime we already proved. \nThere is ample evidence of the criminal conspiracy. There is no motivation in any possible universe where someone guilty of criminal conspiracy burns government documents and we believe that the governments were copies.\nPlease note the word reasonable in reasonable doubt.",
">\n\n\nprovably\n\nTherein lies the problem",
">\n\nWe have ample evidence of conspiracy to subvert democracy",
">\n\nThat's not what's being discussed. We're talking about Meadows burning documents.",
">\n\nLock him up.",
">\n\nMake sure he gets a prison cell with a low flow toilet. Those things piss him off"
] |
>
This women deserves the credit mike pence is getting
|
[
"It's only clear if one can prove they were originals, not copies. I'm all for holding them accountable but you toss the baby out with the bath water. Be rational and logical.",
">\n\nI’m sure they brunt copies because that’s what you do with incriminating evidence copy it and burn the copies. Jesus man.",
">\n\nI'm just saying... rationally speaking, if you can't prove they were original documents, you cannot jump straight to \"yep that's it, hang em\". Are the odds good that they were originals? I'd say yes, but you have to prove it.",
">\n\nHe was a participant in a criminal conspiracy and he burned documents I would vote to convict.",
">\n\nWithout evidence? What you mentioned is circumstantial. If you're willing to convict someone of a specific crime without specific evidence to back it up, you're no better than they are. You would be acting on emotion and bias rather than evidence and proof. This is how lots of people end up locked up who are actually innocent of the crime in question because they are judged based on other behavior. That is not justice served.",
">\n\nIf you provably conspired to murder someone provably and we find human blood stains on your rug its ok to consider it further proof of the same crime we already proved. \nThere is ample evidence of the criminal conspiracy. There is no motivation in any possible universe where someone guilty of criminal conspiracy burns government documents and we believe that the governments were copies.\nPlease note the word reasonable in reasonable doubt.",
">\n\n\nprovably\n\nTherein lies the problem",
">\n\nWe have ample evidence of conspiracy to subvert democracy",
">\n\nThat's not what's being discussed. We're talking about Meadows burning documents.",
">\n\nLock him up.",
">\n\nMake sure he gets a prison cell with a low flow toilet. Those things piss him off",
">\n\nGuys can't even courtesy flush because by the time they finally get that beefroll down the hatch, it's too late--the stink is everywhere by then. Not me, of course. But Bubba, next cell over--hooWEE! Let me tell you folks, it's true. This is America, can you believe it? Maybe it's fine in Gynna. Their poops are smaller, I guess. Short little people over there. Little people, little poops. And I don't like how you have to pull down the jumpsuit to drop a deuce, either. Everyone says I wear it well, though--the warden, the CO's. No one has ever looked more presidential in a jumpsuit, they say."
] |
>
It’s really annoying that Mike Pence keeps getting any credit for anything. He showed he had a spine on the one day it matters, and then keeps trying to play the “we just need to put this behind us and focus on the “real”* issues”. Again, Mike Pence did the only thing that mattered of him on Jan 6, good. I’m glad he was there and did that.
It doesnt make him a good person. It doesnt make him smart. And without verbally attacking the person who sent a far right mob to kill him, he is fine with his life being put in danger for “owning the libs”. What a spineless piece of shit.
*real meaning anything I can make up that forces democrats to react to, and usually it has nothing to do with true policy.
|
[
"It's only clear if one can prove they were originals, not copies. I'm all for holding them accountable but you toss the baby out with the bath water. Be rational and logical.",
">\n\nI’m sure they brunt copies because that’s what you do with incriminating evidence copy it and burn the copies. Jesus man.",
">\n\nI'm just saying... rationally speaking, if you can't prove they were original documents, you cannot jump straight to \"yep that's it, hang em\". Are the odds good that they were originals? I'd say yes, but you have to prove it.",
">\n\nHe was a participant in a criminal conspiracy and he burned documents I would vote to convict.",
">\n\nWithout evidence? What you mentioned is circumstantial. If you're willing to convict someone of a specific crime without specific evidence to back it up, you're no better than they are. You would be acting on emotion and bias rather than evidence and proof. This is how lots of people end up locked up who are actually innocent of the crime in question because they are judged based on other behavior. That is not justice served.",
">\n\nIf you provably conspired to murder someone provably and we find human blood stains on your rug its ok to consider it further proof of the same crime we already proved. \nThere is ample evidence of the criminal conspiracy. There is no motivation in any possible universe where someone guilty of criminal conspiracy burns government documents and we believe that the governments were copies.\nPlease note the word reasonable in reasonable doubt.",
">\n\n\nprovably\n\nTherein lies the problem",
">\n\nWe have ample evidence of conspiracy to subvert democracy",
">\n\nThat's not what's being discussed. We're talking about Meadows burning documents.",
">\n\nLock him up.",
">\n\nMake sure he gets a prison cell with a low flow toilet. Those things piss him off",
">\n\nGuys can't even courtesy flush because by the time they finally get that beefroll down the hatch, it's too late--the stink is everywhere by then. Not me, of course. But Bubba, next cell over--hooWEE! Let me tell you folks, it's true. This is America, can you believe it? Maybe it's fine in Gynna. Their poops are smaller, I guess. Short little people over there. Little people, little poops. And I don't like how you have to pull down the jumpsuit to drop a deuce, either. Everyone says I wear it well, though--the warden, the CO's. No one has ever looked more presidential in a jumpsuit, they say.",
">\n\nThis women deserves the credit mike pence is getting"
] |
>
Eh, you guys are just struggling to give credit where credit is due because of the R next to his name and disagreements on previous policies. Call a spade a spade, the man made a hard decision for the moment and he should be honored for it just like those that voted not to impeach Andrew Johnson in the 1860s and others that came before us who stood to keep our country hole.
|
[
"It's only clear if one can prove they were originals, not copies. I'm all for holding them accountable but you toss the baby out with the bath water. Be rational and logical.",
">\n\nI’m sure they brunt copies because that’s what you do with incriminating evidence copy it and burn the copies. Jesus man.",
">\n\nI'm just saying... rationally speaking, if you can't prove they were original documents, you cannot jump straight to \"yep that's it, hang em\". Are the odds good that they were originals? I'd say yes, but you have to prove it.",
">\n\nHe was a participant in a criminal conspiracy and he burned documents I would vote to convict.",
">\n\nWithout evidence? What you mentioned is circumstantial. If you're willing to convict someone of a specific crime without specific evidence to back it up, you're no better than they are. You would be acting on emotion and bias rather than evidence and proof. This is how lots of people end up locked up who are actually innocent of the crime in question because they are judged based on other behavior. That is not justice served.",
">\n\nIf you provably conspired to murder someone provably and we find human blood stains on your rug its ok to consider it further proof of the same crime we already proved. \nThere is ample evidence of the criminal conspiracy. There is no motivation in any possible universe where someone guilty of criminal conspiracy burns government documents and we believe that the governments were copies.\nPlease note the word reasonable in reasonable doubt.",
">\n\n\nprovably\n\nTherein lies the problem",
">\n\nWe have ample evidence of conspiracy to subvert democracy",
">\n\nThat's not what's being discussed. We're talking about Meadows burning documents.",
">\n\nLock him up.",
">\n\nMake sure he gets a prison cell with a low flow toilet. Those things piss him off",
">\n\nGuys can't even courtesy flush because by the time they finally get that beefroll down the hatch, it's too late--the stink is everywhere by then. Not me, of course. But Bubba, next cell over--hooWEE! Let me tell you folks, it's true. This is America, can you believe it? Maybe it's fine in Gynna. Their poops are smaller, I guess. Short little people over there. Little people, little poops. And I don't like how you have to pull down the jumpsuit to drop a deuce, either. Everyone says I wear it well, though--the warden, the CO's. No one has ever looked more presidential in a jumpsuit, they say.",
">\n\nThis women deserves the credit mike pence is getting",
">\n\nIt’s really annoying that Mike Pence keeps getting any credit for anything. He showed he had a spine on the one day it matters, and then keeps trying to play the “we just need to put this behind us and focus on the “real”* issues”. Again, Mike Pence did the only thing that mattered of him on Jan 6, good. I’m glad he was there and did that.\nIt doesnt make him a good person. It doesnt make him smart. And without verbally attacking the person who sent a far right mob to kill him, he is fine with his life being put in danger for “owning the libs”. What a spineless piece of shit.\n*real meaning anything I can make up that forces democrats to react to, and usually it has nothing to do with true policy."
] |
>
It’s honestly a question of if you think certifying votes should qualify as job done. I’d argue that when you see, firsthand, a fundamental threat to our democracy as the second in command you are duty bound to do more than turn the page.
|
[
"It's only clear if one can prove they were originals, not copies. I'm all for holding them accountable but you toss the baby out with the bath water. Be rational and logical.",
">\n\nI’m sure they brunt copies because that’s what you do with incriminating evidence copy it and burn the copies. Jesus man.",
">\n\nI'm just saying... rationally speaking, if you can't prove they were original documents, you cannot jump straight to \"yep that's it, hang em\". Are the odds good that they were originals? I'd say yes, but you have to prove it.",
">\n\nHe was a participant in a criminal conspiracy and he burned documents I would vote to convict.",
">\n\nWithout evidence? What you mentioned is circumstantial. If you're willing to convict someone of a specific crime without specific evidence to back it up, you're no better than they are. You would be acting on emotion and bias rather than evidence and proof. This is how lots of people end up locked up who are actually innocent of the crime in question because they are judged based on other behavior. That is not justice served.",
">\n\nIf you provably conspired to murder someone provably and we find human blood stains on your rug its ok to consider it further proof of the same crime we already proved. \nThere is ample evidence of the criminal conspiracy. There is no motivation in any possible universe where someone guilty of criminal conspiracy burns government documents and we believe that the governments were copies.\nPlease note the word reasonable in reasonable doubt.",
">\n\n\nprovably\n\nTherein lies the problem",
">\n\nWe have ample evidence of conspiracy to subvert democracy",
">\n\nThat's not what's being discussed. We're talking about Meadows burning documents.",
">\n\nLock him up.",
">\n\nMake sure he gets a prison cell with a low flow toilet. Those things piss him off",
">\n\nGuys can't even courtesy flush because by the time they finally get that beefroll down the hatch, it's too late--the stink is everywhere by then. Not me, of course. But Bubba, next cell over--hooWEE! Let me tell you folks, it's true. This is America, can you believe it? Maybe it's fine in Gynna. Their poops are smaller, I guess. Short little people over there. Little people, little poops. And I don't like how you have to pull down the jumpsuit to drop a deuce, either. Everyone says I wear it well, though--the warden, the CO's. No one has ever looked more presidential in a jumpsuit, they say.",
">\n\nThis women deserves the credit mike pence is getting",
">\n\nIt’s really annoying that Mike Pence keeps getting any credit for anything. He showed he had a spine on the one day it matters, and then keeps trying to play the “we just need to put this behind us and focus on the “real”* issues”. Again, Mike Pence did the only thing that mattered of him on Jan 6, good. I’m glad he was there and did that.\nIt doesnt make him a good person. It doesnt make him smart. And without verbally attacking the person who sent a far right mob to kill him, he is fine with his life being put in danger for “owning the libs”. What a spineless piece of shit.\n*real meaning anything I can make up that forces democrats to react to, and usually it has nothing to do with true policy.",
">\n\nEh, you guys are just struggling to give credit where credit is due because of the R next to his name and disagreements on previous policies. Call a spade a spade, the man made a hard decision for the moment and he should be honored for it just like those that voted not to impeach Andrew Johnson in the 1860s and others that came before us who stood to keep our country hole."
] |
>
I agree completely. I’d just like to push back that it’s a lot easier to say this on a Reddit thread than with 60,000 people screaming hang Mike Pence on your front door from constructed gallows. Anyone who says he doesn’t deserve credit is doing so because they are unable to come down from their tower.
|
[
"It's only clear if one can prove they were originals, not copies. I'm all for holding them accountable but you toss the baby out with the bath water. Be rational and logical.",
">\n\nI’m sure they brunt copies because that’s what you do with incriminating evidence copy it and burn the copies. Jesus man.",
">\n\nI'm just saying... rationally speaking, if you can't prove they were original documents, you cannot jump straight to \"yep that's it, hang em\". Are the odds good that they were originals? I'd say yes, but you have to prove it.",
">\n\nHe was a participant in a criminal conspiracy and he burned documents I would vote to convict.",
">\n\nWithout evidence? What you mentioned is circumstantial. If you're willing to convict someone of a specific crime without specific evidence to back it up, you're no better than they are. You would be acting on emotion and bias rather than evidence and proof. This is how lots of people end up locked up who are actually innocent of the crime in question because they are judged based on other behavior. That is not justice served.",
">\n\nIf you provably conspired to murder someone provably and we find human blood stains on your rug its ok to consider it further proof of the same crime we already proved. \nThere is ample evidence of the criminal conspiracy. There is no motivation in any possible universe where someone guilty of criminal conspiracy burns government documents and we believe that the governments were copies.\nPlease note the word reasonable in reasonable doubt.",
">\n\n\nprovably\n\nTherein lies the problem",
">\n\nWe have ample evidence of conspiracy to subvert democracy",
">\n\nThat's not what's being discussed. We're talking about Meadows burning documents.",
">\n\nLock him up.",
">\n\nMake sure he gets a prison cell with a low flow toilet. Those things piss him off",
">\n\nGuys can't even courtesy flush because by the time they finally get that beefroll down the hatch, it's too late--the stink is everywhere by then. Not me, of course. But Bubba, next cell over--hooWEE! Let me tell you folks, it's true. This is America, can you believe it? Maybe it's fine in Gynna. Their poops are smaller, I guess. Short little people over there. Little people, little poops. And I don't like how you have to pull down the jumpsuit to drop a deuce, either. Everyone says I wear it well, though--the warden, the CO's. No one has ever looked more presidential in a jumpsuit, they say.",
">\n\nThis women deserves the credit mike pence is getting",
">\n\nIt’s really annoying that Mike Pence keeps getting any credit for anything. He showed he had a spine on the one day it matters, and then keeps trying to play the “we just need to put this behind us and focus on the “real”* issues”. Again, Mike Pence did the only thing that mattered of him on Jan 6, good. I’m glad he was there and did that.\nIt doesnt make him a good person. It doesnt make him smart. And without verbally attacking the person who sent a far right mob to kill him, he is fine with his life being put in danger for “owning the libs”. What a spineless piece of shit.\n*real meaning anything I can make up that forces democrats to react to, and usually it has nothing to do with true policy.",
">\n\nEh, you guys are just struggling to give credit where credit is due because of the R next to his name and disagreements on previous policies. Call a spade a spade, the man made a hard decision for the moment and he should be honored for it just like those that voted not to impeach Andrew Johnson in the 1860s and others that came before us who stood to keep our country hole.",
">\n\nIt’s honestly a question of if you think certifying votes should qualify as job done. I’d argue that when you see, firsthand, a fundamental threat to our democracy as the second in command you are duty bound to do more than turn the page."
] |
>
The problem with giving Pence too much credit is that it glosses over the fact that, prior to January 6th, Pence was trying really hard to do what Trump wanted. He was looking for any legal justification to not certify the election and was even entertaining the idea without one.
It's like giving someone a pat on the back for finally doing the right thing after they knowingly did the wrong thing.
In addition, that moment of courage by Pence gets completely washed away by his intransigence to comply with the investigation. All he cares about is his political ambitions.
|
[
"It's only clear if one can prove they were originals, not copies. I'm all for holding them accountable but you toss the baby out with the bath water. Be rational and logical.",
">\n\nI’m sure they brunt copies because that’s what you do with incriminating evidence copy it and burn the copies. Jesus man.",
">\n\nI'm just saying... rationally speaking, if you can't prove they were original documents, you cannot jump straight to \"yep that's it, hang em\". Are the odds good that they were originals? I'd say yes, but you have to prove it.",
">\n\nHe was a participant in a criminal conspiracy and he burned documents I would vote to convict.",
">\n\nWithout evidence? What you mentioned is circumstantial. If you're willing to convict someone of a specific crime without specific evidence to back it up, you're no better than they are. You would be acting on emotion and bias rather than evidence and proof. This is how lots of people end up locked up who are actually innocent of the crime in question because they are judged based on other behavior. That is not justice served.",
">\n\nIf you provably conspired to murder someone provably and we find human blood stains on your rug its ok to consider it further proof of the same crime we already proved. \nThere is ample evidence of the criminal conspiracy. There is no motivation in any possible universe where someone guilty of criminal conspiracy burns government documents and we believe that the governments were copies.\nPlease note the word reasonable in reasonable doubt.",
">\n\n\nprovably\n\nTherein lies the problem",
">\n\nWe have ample evidence of conspiracy to subvert democracy",
">\n\nThat's not what's being discussed. We're talking about Meadows burning documents.",
">\n\nLock him up.",
">\n\nMake sure he gets a prison cell with a low flow toilet. Those things piss him off",
">\n\nGuys can't even courtesy flush because by the time they finally get that beefroll down the hatch, it's too late--the stink is everywhere by then. Not me, of course. But Bubba, next cell over--hooWEE! Let me tell you folks, it's true. This is America, can you believe it? Maybe it's fine in Gynna. Their poops are smaller, I guess. Short little people over there. Little people, little poops. And I don't like how you have to pull down the jumpsuit to drop a deuce, either. Everyone says I wear it well, though--the warden, the CO's. No one has ever looked more presidential in a jumpsuit, they say.",
">\n\nThis women deserves the credit mike pence is getting",
">\n\nIt’s really annoying that Mike Pence keeps getting any credit for anything. He showed he had a spine on the one day it matters, and then keeps trying to play the “we just need to put this behind us and focus on the “real”* issues”. Again, Mike Pence did the only thing that mattered of him on Jan 6, good. I’m glad he was there and did that.\nIt doesnt make him a good person. It doesnt make him smart. And without verbally attacking the person who sent a far right mob to kill him, he is fine with his life being put in danger for “owning the libs”. What a spineless piece of shit.\n*real meaning anything I can make up that forces democrats to react to, and usually it has nothing to do with true policy.",
">\n\nEh, you guys are just struggling to give credit where credit is due because of the R next to his name and disagreements on previous policies. Call a spade a spade, the man made a hard decision for the moment and he should be honored for it just like those that voted not to impeach Andrew Johnson in the 1860s and others that came before us who stood to keep our country hole.",
">\n\nIt’s honestly a question of if you think certifying votes should qualify as job done. I’d argue that when you see, firsthand, a fundamental threat to our democracy as the second in command you are duty bound to do more than turn the page.",
">\n\nI agree completely. I’d just like to push back that it’s a lot easier to say this on a Reddit thread than with 60,000 people screaming hang Mike Pence on your front door from constructed gallows. Anyone who says he doesn’t deserve credit is doing so because they are unable to come down from their tower."
] |
>
Maybe so. But history will be written with Pence as a hero and that’s okay with me.
|
[
"It's only clear if one can prove they were originals, not copies. I'm all for holding them accountable but you toss the baby out with the bath water. Be rational and logical.",
">\n\nI’m sure they brunt copies because that’s what you do with incriminating evidence copy it and burn the copies. Jesus man.",
">\n\nI'm just saying... rationally speaking, if you can't prove they were original documents, you cannot jump straight to \"yep that's it, hang em\". Are the odds good that they were originals? I'd say yes, but you have to prove it.",
">\n\nHe was a participant in a criminal conspiracy and he burned documents I would vote to convict.",
">\n\nWithout evidence? What you mentioned is circumstantial. If you're willing to convict someone of a specific crime without specific evidence to back it up, you're no better than they are. You would be acting on emotion and bias rather than evidence and proof. This is how lots of people end up locked up who are actually innocent of the crime in question because they are judged based on other behavior. That is not justice served.",
">\n\nIf you provably conspired to murder someone provably and we find human blood stains on your rug its ok to consider it further proof of the same crime we already proved. \nThere is ample evidence of the criminal conspiracy. There is no motivation in any possible universe where someone guilty of criminal conspiracy burns government documents and we believe that the governments were copies.\nPlease note the word reasonable in reasonable doubt.",
">\n\n\nprovably\n\nTherein lies the problem",
">\n\nWe have ample evidence of conspiracy to subvert democracy",
">\n\nThat's not what's being discussed. We're talking about Meadows burning documents.",
">\n\nLock him up.",
">\n\nMake sure he gets a prison cell with a low flow toilet. Those things piss him off",
">\n\nGuys can't even courtesy flush because by the time they finally get that beefroll down the hatch, it's too late--the stink is everywhere by then. Not me, of course. But Bubba, next cell over--hooWEE! Let me tell you folks, it's true. This is America, can you believe it? Maybe it's fine in Gynna. Their poops are smaller, I guess. Short little people over there. Little people, little poops. And I don't like how you have to pull down the jumpsuit to drop a deuce, either. Everyone says I wear it well, though--the warden, the CO's. No one has ever looked more presidential in a jumpsuit, they say.",
">\n\nThis women deserves the credit mike pence is getting",
">\n\nIt’s really annoying that Mike Pence keeps getting any credit for anything. He showed he had a spine on the one day it matters, and then keeps trying to play the “we just need to put this behind us and focus on the “real”* issues”. Again, Mike Pence did the only thing that mattered of him on Jan 6, good. I’m glad he was there and did that.\nIt doesnt make him a good person. It doesnt make him smart. And without verbally attacking the person who sent a far right mob to kill him, he is fine with his life being put in danger for “owning the libs”. What a spineless piece of shit.\n*real meaning anything I can make up that forces democrats to react to, and usually it has nothing to do with true policy.",
">\n\nEh, you guys are just struggling to give credit where credit is due because of the R next to his name and disagreements on previous policies. Call a spade a spade, the man made a hard decision for the moment and he should be honored for it just like those that voted not to impeach Andrew Johnson in the 1860s and others that came before us who stood to keep our country hole.",
">\n\nIt’s honestly a question of if you think certifying votes should qualify as job done. I’d argue that when you see, firsthand, a fundamental threat to our democracy as the second in command you are duty bound to do more than turn the page.",
">\n\nI agree completely. I’d just like to push back that it’s a lot easier to say this on a Reddit thread than with 60,000 people screaming hang Mike Pence on your front door from constructed gallows. Anyone who says he doesn’t deserve credit is doing so because they are unable to come down from their tower.",
">\n\nThe problem with giving Pence too much credit is that it glosses over the fact that, prior to January 6th, Pence was trying really hard to do what Trump wanted. He was looking for any legal justification to not certify the election and was even entertaining the idea without one.\nIt's like giving someone a pat on the back for finally doing the right thing after they knowingly did the wrong thing.\nIn addition, that moment of courage by Pence gets completely washed away by his intransigence to comply with the investigation. All he cares about is his political ambitions."
] |
>
And cassidy Hutchinson should be. My original point. Yea, his co pilot through this entire shit show is a hero for doing his job. I don't feel bad for the situation they got themselves into. There were more than enough warning signs leading allll the way up to this day.
|
[
"It's only clear if one can prove they were originals, not copies. I'm all for holding them accountable but you toss the baby out with the bath water. Be rational and logical.",
">\n\nI’m sure they brunt copies because that’s what you do with incriminating evidence copy it and burn the copies. Jesus man.",
">\n\nI'm just saying... rationally speaking, if you can't prove they were original documents, you cannot jump straight to \"yep that's it, hang em\". Are the odds good that they were originals? I'd say yes, but you have to prove it.",
">\n\nHe was a participant in a criminal conspiracy and he burned documents I would vote to convict.",
">\n\nWithout evidence? What you mentioned is circumstantial. If you're willing to convict someone of a specific crime without specific evidence to back it up, you're no better than they are. You would be acting on emotion and bias rather than evidence and proof. This is how lots of people end up locked up who are actually innocent of the crime in question because they are judged based on other behavior. That is not justice served.",
">\n\nIf you provably conspired to murder someone provably and we find human blood stains on your rug its ok to consider it further proof of the same crime we already proved. \nThere is ample evidence of the criminal conspiracy. There is no motivation in any possible universe where someone guilty of criminal conspiracy burns government documents and we believe that the governments were copies.\nPlease note the word reasonable in reasonable doubt.",
">\n\n\nprovably\n\nTherein lies the problem",
">\n\nWe have ample evidence of conspiracy to subvert democracy",
">\n\nThat's not what's being discussed. We're talking about Meadows burning documents.",
">\n\nLock him up.",
">\n\nMake sure he gets a prison cell with a low flow toilet. Those things piss him off",
">\n\nGuys can't even courtesy flush because by the time they finally get that beefroll down the hatch, it's too late--the stink is everywhere by then. Not me, of course. But Bubba, next cell over--hooWEE! Let me tell you folks, it's true. This is America, can you believe it? Maybe it's fine in Gynna. Their poops are smaller, I guess. Short little people over there. Little people, little poops. And I don't like how you have to pull down the jumpsuit to drop a deuce, either. Everyone says I wear it well, though--the warden, the CO's. No one has ever looked more presidential in a jumpsuit, they say.",
">\n\nThis women deserves the credit mike pence is getting",
">\n\nIt’s really annoying that Mike Pence keeps getting any credit for anything. He showed he had a spine on the one day it matters, and then keeps trying to play the “we just need to put this behind us and focus on the “real”* issues”. Again, Mike Pence did the only thing that mattered of him on Jan 6, good. I’m glad he was there and did that.\nIt doesnt make him a good person. It doesnt make him smart. And without verbally attacking the person who sent a far right mob to kill him, he is fine with his life being put in danger for “owning the libs”. What a spineless piece of shit.\n*real meaning anything I can make up that forces democrats to react to, and usually it has nothing to do with true policy.",
">\n\nEh, you guys are just struggling to give credit where credit is due because of the R next to his name and disagreements on previous policies. Call a spade a spade, the man made a hard decision for the moment and he should be honored for it just like those that voted not to impeach Andrew Johnson in the 1860s and others that came before us who stood to keep our country hole.",
">\n\nIt’s honestly a question of if you think certifying votes should qualify as job done. I’d argue that when you see, firsthand, a fundamental threat to our democracy as the second in command you are duty bound to do more than turn the page.",
">\n\nI agree completely. I’d just like to push back that it’s a lot easier to say this on a Reddit thread than with 60,000 people screaming hang Mike Pence on your front door from constructed gallows. Anyone who says he doesn’t deserve credit is doing so because they are unable to come down from their tower.",
">\n\nThe problem with giving Pence too much credit is that it glosses over the fact that, prior to January 6th, Pence was trying really hard to do what Trump wanted. He was looking for any legal justification to not certify the election and was even entertaining the idea without one.\nIt's like giving someone a pat on the back for finally doing the right thing after they knowingly did the wrong thing.\nIn addition, that moment of courage by Pence gets completely washed away by his intransigence to comply with the investigation. All he cares about is his political ambitions.",
">\n\nMaybe so. But history will be written with Pence as a hero and that’s okay with me."
] |
>
Welp... That's obstruction / destruction of evidence.
|
[
"It's only clear if one can prove they were originals, not copies. I'm all for holding them accountable but you toss the baby out with the bath water. Be rational and logical.",
">\n\nI’m sure they brunt copies because that’s what you do with incriminating evidence copy it and burn the copies. Jesus man.",
">\n\nI'm just saying... rationally speaking, if you can't prove they were original documents, you cannot jump straight to \"yep that's it, hang em\". Are the odds good that they were originals? I'd say yes, but you have to prove it.",
">\n\nHe was a participant in a criminal conspiracy and he burned documents I would vote to convict.",
">\n\nWithout evidence? What you mentioned is circumstantial. If you're willing to convict someone of a specific crime without specific evidence to back it up, you're no better than they are. You would be acting on emotion and bias rather than evidence and proof. This is how lots of people end up locked up who are actually innocent of the crime in question because they are judged based on other behavior. That is not justice served.",
">\n\nIf you provably conspired to murder someone provably and we find human blood stains on your rug its ok to consider it further proof of the same crime we already proved. \nThere is ample evidence of the criminal conspiracy. There is no motivation in any possible universe where someone guilty of criminal conspiracy burns government documents and we believe that the governments were copies.\nPlease note the word reasonable in reasonable doubt.",
">\n\n\nprovably\n\nTherein lies the problem",
">\n\nWe have ample evidence of conspiracy to subvert democracy",
">\n\nThat's not what's being discussed. We're talking about Meadows burning documents.",
">\n\nLock him up.",
">\n\nMake sure he gets a prison cell with a low flow toilet. Those things piss him off",
">\n\nGuys can't even courtesy flush because by the time they finally get that beefroll down the hatch, it's too late--the stink is everywhere by then. Not me, of course. But Bubba, next cell over--hooWEE! Let me tell you folks, it's true. This is America, can you believe it? Maybe it's fine in Gynna. Their poops are smaller, I guess. Short little people over there. Little people, little poops. And I don't like how you have to pull down the jumpsuit to drop a deuce, either. Everyone says I wear it well, though--the warden, the CO's. No one has ever looked more presidential in a jumpsuit, they say.",
">\n\nThis women deserves the credit mike pence is getting",
">\n\nIt’s really annoying that Mike Pence keeps getting any credit for anything. He showed he had a spine on the one day it matters, and then keeps trying to play the “we just need to put this behind us and focus on the “real”* issues”. Again, Mike Pence did the only thing that mattered of him on Jan 6, good. I’m glad he was there and did that.\nIt doesnt make him a good person. It doesnt make him smart. And without verbally attacking the person who sent a far right mob to kill him, he is fine with his life being put in danger for “owning the libs”. What a spineless piece of shit.\n*real meaning anything I can make up that forces democrats to react to, and usually it has nothing to do with true policy.",
">\n\nEh, you guys are just struggling to give credit where credit is due because of the R next to his name and disagreements on previous policies. Call a spade a spade, the man made a hard decision for the moment and he should be honored for it just like those that voted not to impeach Andrew Johnson in the 1860s and others that came before us who stood to keep our country hole.",
">\n\nIt’s honestly a question of if you think certifying votes should qualify as job done. I’d argue that when you see, firsthand, a fundamental threat to our democracy as the second in command you are duty bound to do more than turn the page.",
">\n\nI agree completely. I’d just like to push back that it’s a lot easier to say this on a Reddit thread than with 60,000 people screaming hang Mike Pence on your front door from constructed gallows. Anyone who says he doesn’t deserve credit is doing so because they are unable to come down from their tower.",
">\n\nThe problem with giving Pence too much credit is that it glosses over the fact that, prior to January 6th, Pence was trying really hard to do what Trump wanted. He was looking for any legal justification to not certify the election and was even entertaining the idea without one.\nIt's like giving someone a pat on the back for finally doing the right thing after they knowingly did the wrong thing.\nIn addition, that moment of courage by Pence gets completely washed away by his intransigence to comply with the investigation. All he cares about is his political ambitions.",
">\n\nMaybe so. But history will be written with Pence as a hero and that’s okay with me.",
">\n\nAnd cassidy Hutchinson should be. My original point. Yea, his co pilot through this entire shit show is a hero for doing his job. I don't feel bad for the situation they got themselves into. There were more than enough warning signs leading allll the way up to this day."
] |
>
For all the security cameras in public places you'd think we'd also have them for public offices.
|
[
"It's only clear if one can prove they were originals, not copies. I'm all for holding them accountable but you toss the baby out with the bath water. Be rational and logical.",
">\n\nI’m sure they brunt copies because that’s what you do with incriminating evidence copy it and burn the copies. Jesus man.",
">\n\nI'm just saying... rationally speaking, if you can't prove they were original documents, you cannot jump straight to \"yep that's it, hang em\". Are the odds good that they were originals? I'd say yes, but you have to prove it.",
">\n\nHe was a participant in a criminal conspiracy and he burned documents I would vote to convict.",
">\n\nWithout evidence? What you mentioned is circumstantial. If you're willing to convict someone of a specific crime without specific evidence to back it up, you're no better than they are. You would be acting on emotion and bias rather than evidence and proof. This is how lots of people end up locked up who are actually innocent of the crime in question because they are judged based on other behavior. That is not justice served.",
">\n\nIf you provably conspired to murder someone provably and we find human blood stains on your rug its ok to consider it further proof of the same crime we already proved. \nThere is ample evidence of the criminal conspiracy. There is no motivation in any possible universe where someone guilty of criminal conspiracy burns government documents and we believe that the governments were copies.\nPlease note the word reasonable in reasonable doubt.",
">\n\n\nprovably\n\nTherein lies the problem",
">\n\nWe have ample evidence of conspiracy to subvert democracy",
">\n\nThat's not what's being discussed. We're talking about Meadows burning documents.",
">\n\nLock him up.",
">\n\nMake sure he gets a prison cell with a low flow toilet. Those things piss him off",
">\n\nGuys can't even courtesy flush because by the time they finally get that beefroll down the hatch, it's too late--the stink is everywhere by then. Not me, of course. But Bubba, next cell over--hooWEE! Let me tell you folks, it's true. This is America, can you believe it? Maybe it's fine in Gynna. Their poops are smaller, I guess. Short little people over there. Little people, little poops. And I don't like how you have to pull down the jumpsuit to drop a deuce, either. Everyone says I wear it well, though--the warden, the CO's. No one has ever looked more presidential in a jumpsuit, they say.",
">\n\nThis women deserves the credit mike pence is getting",
">\n\nIt’s really annoying that Mike Pence keeps getting any credit for anything. He showed he had a spine on the one day it matters, and then keeps trying to play the “we just need to put this behind us and focus on the “real”* issues”. Again, Mike Pence did the only thing that mattered of him on Jan 6, good. I’m glad he was there and did that.\nIt doesnt make him a good person. It doesnt make him smart. And without verbally attacking the person who sent a far right mob to kill him, he is fine with his life being put in danger for “owning the libs”. What a spineless piece of shit.\n*real meaning anything I can make up that forces democrats to react to, and usually it has nothing to do with true policy.",
">\n\nEh, you guys are just struggling to give credit where credit is due because of the R next to his name and disagreements on previous policies. Call a spade a spade, the man made a hard decision for the moment and he should be honored for it just like those that voted not to impeach Andrew Johnson in the 1860s and others that came before us who stood to keep our country hole.",
">\n\nIt’s honestly a question of if you think certifying votes should qualify as job done. I’d argue that when you see, firsthand, a fundamental threat to our democracy as the second in command you are duty bound to do more than turn the page.",
">\n\nI agree completely. I’d just like to push back that it’s a lot easier to say this on a Reddit thread than with 60,000 people screaming hang Mike Pence on your front door from constructed gallows. Anyone who says he doesn’t deserve credit is doing so because they are unable to come down from their tower.",
">\n\nThe problem with giving Pence too much credit is that it glosses over the fact that, prior to January 6th, Pence was trying really hard to do what Trump wanted. He was looking for any legal justification to not certify the election and was even entertaining the idea without one.\nIt's like giving someone a pat on the back for finally doing the right thing after they knowingly did the wrong thing.\nIn addition, that moment of courage by Pence gets completely washed away by his intransigence to comply with the investigation. All he cares about is his political ambitions.",
">\n\nMaybe so. But history will be written with Pence as a hero and that’s okay with me.",
">\n\nAnd cassidy Hutchinson should be. My original point. Yea, his co pilot through this entire shit show is a hero for doing his job. I don't feel bad for the situation they got themselves into. There were more than enough warning signs leading allll the way up to this day.",
">\n\nWelp... That's obstruction / destruction of evidence."
] |
>
The difference is the people making those decisions are in the offices.
|
[
"It's only clear if one can prove they were originals, not copies. I'm all for holding them accountable but you toss the baby out with the bath water. Be rational and logical.",
">\n\nI’m sure they brunt copies because that’s what you do with incriminating evidence copy it and burn the copies. Jesus man.",
">\n\nI'm just saying... rationally speaking, if you can't prove they were original documents, you cannot jump straight to \"yep that's it, hang em\". Are the odds good that they were originals? I'd say yes, but you have to prove it.",
">\n\nHe was a participant in a criminal conspiracy and he burned documents I would vote to convict.",
">\n\nWithout evidence? What you mentioned is circumstantial. If you're willing to convict someone of a specific crime without specific evidence to back it up, you're no better than they are. You would be acting on emotion and bias rather than evidence and proof. This is how lots of people end up locked up who are actually innocent of the crime in question because they are judged based on other behavior. That is not justice served.",
">\n\nIf you provably conspired to murder someone provably and we find human blood stains on your rug its ok to consider it further proof of the same crime we already proved. \nThere is ample evidence of the criminal conspiracy. There is no motivation in any possible universe where someone guilty of criminal conspiracy burns government documents and we believe that the governments were copies.\nPlease note the word reasonable in reasonable doubt.",
">\n\n\nprovably\n\nTherein lies the problem",
">\n\nWe have ample evidence of conspiracy to subvert democracy",
">\n\nThat's not what's being discussed. We're talking about Meadows burning documents.",
">\n\nLock him up.",
">\n\nMake sure he gets a prison cell with a low flow toilet. Those things piss him off",
">\n\nGuys can't even courtesy flush because by the time they finally get that beefroll down the hatch, it's too late--the stink is everywhere by then. Not me, of course. But Bubba, next cell over--hooWEE! Let me tell you folks, it's true. This is America, can you believe it? Maybe it's fine in Gynna. Their poops are smaller, I guess. Short little people over there. Little people, little poops. And I don't like how you have to pull down the jumpsuit to drop a deuce, either. Everyone says I wear it well, though--the warden, the CO's. No one has ever looked more presidential in a jumpsuit, they say.",
">\n\nThis women deserves the credit mike pence is getting",
">\n\nIt’s really annoying that Mike Pence keeps getting any credit for anything. He showed he had a spine on the one day it matters, and then keeps trying to play the “we just need to put this behind us and focus on the “real”* issues”. Again, Mike Pence did the only thing that mattered of him on Jan 6, good. I’m glad he was there and did that.\nIt doesnt make him a good person. It doesnt make him smart. And without verbally attacking the person who sent a far right mob to kill him, he is fine with his life being put in danger for “owning the libs”. What a spineless piece of shit.\n*real meaning anything I can make up that forces democrats to react to, and usually it has nothing to do with true policy.",
">\n\nEh, you guys are just struggling to give credit where credit is due because of the R next to his name and disagreements on previous policies. Call a spade a spade, the man made a hard decision for the moment and he should be honored for it just like those that voted not to impeach Andrew Johnson in the 1860s and others that came before us who stood to keep our country hole.",
">\n\nIt’s honestly a question of if you think certifying votes should qualify as job done. I’d argue that when you see, firsthand, a fundamental threat to our democracy as the second in command you are duty bound to do more than turn the page.",
">\n\nI agree completely. I’d just like to push back that it’s a lot easier to say this on a Reddit thread than with 60,000 people screaming hang Mike Pence on your front door from constructed gallows. Anyone who says he doesn’t deserve credit is doing so because they are unable to come down from their tower.",
">\n\nThe problem with giving Pence too much credit is that it glosses over the fact that, prior to January 6th, Pence was trying really hard to do what Trump wanted. He was looking for any legal justification to not certify the election and was even entertaining the idea without one.\nIt's like giving someone a pat on the back for finally doing the right thing after they knowingly did the wrong thing.\nIn addition, that moment of courage by Pence gets completely washed away by his intransigence to comply with the investigation. All he cares about is his political ambitions.",
">\n\nMaybe so. But history will be written with Pence as a hero and that’s okay with me.",
">\n\nAnd cassidy Hutchinson should be. My original point. Yea, his co pilot through this entire shit show is a hero for doing his job. I don't feel bad for the situation they got themselves into. There were more than enough warning signs leading allll the way up to this day.",
">\n\nWelp... That's obstruction / destruction of evidence.",
">\n\nFor all the security cameras in public places you'd think we'd also have them for public offices."
] |
>
It's probably more effective than flushing them.
|
[
"It's only clear if one can prove they were originals, not copies. I'm all for holding them accountable but you toss the baby out with the bath water. Be rational and logical.",
">\n\nI’m sure they brunt copies because that’s what you do with incriminating evidence copy it and burn the copies. Jesus man.",
">\n\nI'm just saying... rationally speaking, if you can't prove they were original documents, you cannot jump straight to \"yep that's it, hang em\". Are the odds good that they were originals? I'd say yes, but you have to prove it.",
">\n\nHe was a participant in a criminal conspiracy and he burned documents I would vote to convict.",
">\n\nWithout evidence? What you mentioned is circumstantial. If you're willing to convict someone of a specific crime without specific evidence to back it up, you're no better than they are. You would be acting on emotion and bias rather than evidence and proof. This is how lots of people end up locked up who are actually innocent of the crime in question because they are judged based on other behavior. That is not justice served.",
">\n\nIf you provably conspired to murder someone provably and we find human blood stains on your rug its ok to consider it further proof of the same crime we already proved. \nThere is ample evidence of the criminal conspiracy. There is no motivation in any possible universe where someone guilty of criminal conspiracy burns government documents and we believe that the governments were copies.\nPlease note the word reasonable in reasonable doubt.",
">\n\n\nprovably\n\nTherein lies the problem",
">\n\nWe have ample evidence of conspiracy to subvert democracy",
">\n\nThat's not what's being discussed. We're talking about Meadows burning documents.",
">\n\nLock him up.",
">\n\nMake sure he gets a prison cell with a low flow toilet. Those things piss him off",
">\n\nGuys can't even courtesy flush because by the time they finally get that beefroll down the hatch, it's too late--the stink is everywhere by then. Not me, of course. But Bubba, next cell over--hooWEE! Let me tell you folks, it's true. This is America, can you believe it? Maybe it's fine in Gynna. Their poops are smaller, I guess. Short little people over there. Little people, little poops. And I don't like how you have to pull down the jumpsuit to drop a deuce, either. Everyone says I wear it well, though--the warden, the CO's. No one has ever looked more presidential in a jumpsuit, they say.",
">\n\nThis women deserves the credit mike pence is getting",
">\n\nIt’s really annoying that Mike Pence keeps getting any credit for anything. He showed he had a spine on the one day it matters, and then keeps trying to play the “we just need to put this behind us and focus on the “real”* issues”. Again, Mike Pence did the only thing that mattered of him on Jan 6, good. I’m glad he was there and did that.\nIt doesnt make him a good person. It doesnt make him smart. And without verbally attacking the person who sent a far right mob to kill him, he is fine with his life being put in danger for “owning the libs”. What a spineless piece of shit.\n*real meaning anything I can make up that forces democrats to react to, and usually it has nothing to do with true policy.",
">\n\nEh, you guys are just struggling to give credit where credit is due because of the R next to his name and disagreements on previous policies. Call a spade a spade, the man made a hard decision for the moment and he should be honored for it just like those that voted not to impeach Andrew Johnson in the 1860s and others that came before us who stood to keep our country hole.",
">\n\nIt’s honestly a question of if you think certifying votes should qualify as job done. I’d argue that when you see, firsthand, a fundamental threat to our democracy as the second in command you are duty bound to do more than turn the page.",
">\n\nI agree completely. I’d just like to push back that it’s a lot easier to say this on a Reddit thread than with 60,000 people screaming hang Mike Pence on your front door from constructed gallows. Anyone who says he doesn’t deserve credit is doing so because they are unable to come down from their tower.",
">\n\nThe problem with giving Pence too much credit is that it glosses over the fact that, prior to January 6th, Pence was trying really hard to do what Trump wanted. He was looking for any legal justification to not certify the election and was even entertaining the idea without one.\nIt's like giving someone a pat on the back for finally doing the right thing after they knowingly did the wrong thing.\nIn addition, that moment of courage by Pence gets completely washed away by his intransigence to comply with the investigation. All he cares about is his political ambitions.",
">\n\nMaybe so. But history will be written with Pence as a hero and that’s okay with me.",
">\n\nAnd cassidy Hutchinson should be. My original point. Yea, his co pilot through this entire shit show is a hero for doing his job. I don't feel bad for the situation they got themselves into. There were more than enough warning signs leading allll the way up to this day.",
">\n\nWelp... That's obstruction / destruction of evidence.",
">\n\nFor all the security cameras in public places you'd think we'd also have them for public offices.",
">\n\nThe difference is the people making those decisions are in the offices."
] |
>
Or eating them
|
[
"It's only clear if one can prove they were originals, not copies. I'm all for holding them accountable but you toss the baby out with the bath water. Be rational and logical.",
">\n\nI’m sure they brunt copies because that’s what you do with incriminating evidence copy it and burn the copies. Jesus man.",
">\n\nI'm just saying... rationally speaking, if you can't prove they were original documents, you cannot jump straight to \"yep that's it, hang em\". Are the odds good that they were originals? I'd say yes, but you have to prove it.",
">\n\nHe was a participant in a criminal conspiracy and he burned documents I would vote to convict.",
">\n\nWithout evidence? What you mentioned is circumstantial. If you're willing to convict someone of a specific crime without specific evidence to back it up, you're no better than they are. You would be acting on emotion and bias rather than evidence and proof. This is how lots of people end up locked up who are actually innocent of the crime in question because they are judged based on other behavior. That is not justice served.",
">\n\nIf you provably conspired to murder someone provably and we find human blood stains on your rug its ok to consider it further proof of the same crime we already proved. \nThere is ample evidence of the criminal conspiracy. There is no motivation in any possible universe where someone guilty of criminal conspiracy burns government documents and we believe that the governments were copies.\nPlease note the word reasonable in reasonable doubt.",
">\n\n\nprovably\n\nTherein lies the problem",
">\n\nWe have ample evidence of conspiracy to subvert democracy",
">\n\nThat's not what's being discussed. We're talking about Meadows burning documents.",
">\n\nLock him up.",
">\n\nMake sure he gets a prison cell with a low flow toilet. Those things piss him off",
">\n\nGuys can't even courtesy flush because by the time they finally get that beefroll down the hatch, it's too late--the stink is everywhere by then. Not me, of course. But Bubba, next cell over--hooWEE! Let me tell you folks, it's true. This is America, can you believe it? Maybe it's fine in Gynna. Their poops are smaller, I guess. Short little people over there. Little people, little poops. And I don't like how you have to pull down the jumpsuit to drop a deuce, either. Everyone says I wear it well, though--the warden, the CO's. No one has ever looked more presidential in a jumpsuit, they say.",
">\n\nThis women deserves the credit mike pence is getting",
">\n\nIt’s really annoying that Mike Pence keeps getting any credit for anything. He showed he had a spine on the one day it matters, and then keeps trying to play the “we just need to put this behind us and focus on the “real”* issues”. Again, Mike Pence did the only thing that mattered of him on Jan 6, good. I’m glad he was there and did that.\nIt doesnt make him a good person. It doesnt make him smart. And without verbally attacking the person who sent a far right mob to kill him, he is fine with his life being put in danger for “owning the libs”. What a spineless piece of shit.\n*real meaning anything I can make up that forces democrats to react to, and usually it has nothing to do with true policy.",
">\n\nEh, you guys are just struggling to give credit where credit is due because of the R next to his name and disagreements on previous policies. Call a spade a spade, the man made a hard decision for the moment and he should be honored for it just like those that voted not to impeach Andrew Johnson in the 1860s and others that came before us who stood to keep our country hole.",
">\n\nIt’s honestly a question of if you think certifying votes should qualify as job done. I’d argue that when you see, firsthand, a fundamental threat to our democracy as the second in command you are duty bound to do more than turn the page.",
">\n\nI agree completely. I’d just like to push back that it’s a lot easier to say this on a Reddit thread than with 60,000 people screaming hang Mike Pence on your front door from constructed gallows. Anyone who says he doesn’t deserve credit is doing so because they are unable to come down from their tower.",
">\n\nThe problem with giving Pence too much credit is that it glosses over the fact that, prior to January 6th, Pence was trying really hard to do what Trump wanted. He was looking for any legal justification to not certify the election and was even entertaining the idea without one.\nIt's like giving someone a pat on the back for finally doing the right thing after they knowingly did the wrong thing.\nIn addition, that moment of courage by Pence gets completely washed away by his intransigence to comply with the investigation. All he cares about is his political ambitions.",
">\n\nMaybe so. But history will be written with Pence as a hero and that’s okay with me.",
">\n\nAnd cassidy Hutchinson should be. My original point. Yea, his co pilot through this entire shit show is a hero for doing his job. I don't feel bad for the situation they got themselves into. There were more than enough warning signs leading allll the way up to this day.",
">\n\nWelp... That's obstruction / destruction of evidence.",
">\n\nFor all the security cameras in public places you'd think we'd also have them for public offices.",
">\n\nThe difference is the people making those decisions are in the offices.",
">\n\nIt's probably more effective than flushing them."
] |
>
Or stealing them.
|
[
"It's only clear if one can prove they were originals, not copies. I'm all for holding them accountable but you toss the baby out with the bath water. Be rational and logical.",
">\n\nI’m sure they brunt copies because that’s what you do with incriminating evidence copy it and burn the copies. Jesus man.",
">\n\nI'm just saying... rationally speaking, if you can't prove they were original documents, you cannot jump straight to \"yep that's it, hang em\". Are the odds good that they were originals? I'd say yes, but you have to prove it.",
">\n\nHe was a participant in a criminal conspiracy and he burned documents I would vote to convict.",
">\n\nWithout evidence? What you mentioned is circumstantial. If you're willing to convict someone of a specific crime without specific evidence to back it up, you're no better than they are. You would be acting on emotion and bias rather than evidence and proof. This is how lots of people end up locked up who are actually innocent of the crime in question because they are judged based on other behavior. That is not justice served.",
">\n\nIf you provably conspired to murder someone provably and we find human blood stains on your rug its ok to consider it further proof of the same crime we already proved. \nThere is ample evidence of the criminal conspiracy. There is no motivation in any possible universe where someone guilty of criminal conspiracy burns government documents and we believe that the governments were copies.\nPlease note the word reasonable in reasonable doubt.",
">\n\n\nprovably\n\nTherein lies the problem",
">\n\nWe have ample evidence of conspiracy to subvert democracy",
">\n\nThat's not what's being discussed. We're talking about Meadows burning documents.",
">\n\nLock him up.",
">\n\nMake sure he gets a prison cell with a low flow toilet. Those things piss him off",
">\n\nGuys can't even courtesy flush because by the time they finally get that beefroll down the hatch, it's too late--the stink is everywhere by then. Not me, of course. But Bubba, next cell over--hooWEE! Let me tell you folks, it's true. This is America, can you believe it? Maybe it's fine in Gynna. Their poops are smaller, I guess. Short little people over there. Little people, little poops. And I don't like how you have to pull down the jumpsuit to drop a deuce, either. Everyone says I wear it well, though--the warden, the CO's. No one has ever looked more presidential in a jumpsuit, they say.",
">\n\nThis women deserves the credit mike pence is getting",
">\n\nIt’s really annoying that Mike Pence keeps getting any credit for anything. He showed he had a spine on the one day it matters, and then keeps trying to play the “we just need to put this behind us and focus on the “real”* issues”. Again, Mike Pence did the only thing that mattered of him on Jan 6, good. I’m glad he was there and did that.\nIt doesnt make him a good person. It doesnt make him smart. And without verbally attacking the person who sent a far right mob to kill him, he is fine with his life being put in danger for “owning the libs”. What a spineless piece of shit.\n*real meaning anything I can make up that forces democrats to react to, and usually it has nothing to do with true policy.",
">\n\nEh, you guys are just struggling to give credit where credit is due because of the R next to his name and disagreements on previous policies. Call a spade a spade, the man made a hard decision for the moment and he should be honored for it just like those that voted not to impeach Andrew Johnson in the 1860s and others that came before us who stood to keep our country hole.",
">\n\nIt’s honestly a question of if you think certifying votes should qualify as job done. I’d argue that when you see, firsthand, a fundamental threat to our democracy as the second in command you are duty bound to do more than turn the page.",
">\n\nI agree completely. I’d just like to push back that it’s a lot easier to say this on a Reddit thread than with 60,000 people screaming hang Mike Pence on your front door from constructed gallows. Anyone who says he doesn’t deserve credit is doing so because they are unable to come down from their tower.",
">\n\nThe problem with giving Pence too much credit is that it glosses over the fact that, prior to January 6th, Pence was trying really hard to do what Trump wanted. He was looking for any legal justification to not certify the election and was even entertaining the idea without one.\nIt's like giving someone a pat on the back for finally doing the right thing after they knowingly did the wrong thing.\nIn addition, that moment of courage by Pence gets completely washed away by his intransigence to comply with the investigation. All he cares about is his political ambitions.",
">\n\nMaybe so. But history will be written with Pence as a hero and that’s okay with me.",
">\n\nAnd cassidy Hutchinson should be. My original point. Yea, his co pilot through this entire shit show is a hero for doing his job. I don't feel bad for the situation they got themselves into. There were more than enough warning signs leading allll the way up to this day.",
">\n\nWelp... That's obstruction / destruction of evidence.",
">\n\nFor all the security cameras in public places you'd think we'd also have them for public offices.",
">\n\nThe difference is the people making those decisions are in the offices.",
">\n\nIt's probably more effective than flushing them.",
">\n\nOr eating them"
] |
>
This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 65%. (I'm a bot)
Former Trump White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson indicated Mark Meadows, the White House chief of staff, burned documents in his fireplace roughly a dozen times in the final weeks of the administration, according to newly released transcripts of her House Jan. 6 committee depositions.
"The Presidential Records Act only asks that you keep the original copy of a document. So, yes," Hutchinson said when asked if she saw Meadows use the fireplace to burn documents.
"I know maybe three or four times - between two and four times, he had Mr. Perry in his office right before," Hutchinson told the committee, although she cautioned that she did not know what documents were burned.
Extended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Hutchinson^#1 Meadows^#2 burn^#3 document^#4 fireplace^#5
|
[
"It's only clear if one can prove they were originals, not copies. I'm all for holding them accountable but you toss the baby out with the bath water. Be rational and logical.",
">\n\nI’m sure they brunt copies because that’s what you do with incriminating evidence copy it and burn the copies. Jesus man.",
">\n\nI'm just saying... rationally speaking, if you can't prove they were original documents, you cannot jump straight to \"yep that's it, hang em\". Are the odds good that they were originals? I'd say yes, but you have to prove it.",
">\n\nHe was a participant in a criminal conspiracy and he burned documents I would vote to convict.",
">\n\nWithout evidence? What you mentioned is circumstantial. If you're willing to convict someone of a specific crime without specific evidence to back it up, you're no better than they are. You would be acting on emotion and bias rather than evidence and proof. This is how lots of people end up locked up who are actually innocent of the crime in question because they are judged based on other behavior. That is not justice served.",
">\n\nIf you provably conspired to murder someone provably and we find human blood stains on your rug its ok to consider it further proof of the same crime we already proved. \nThere is ample evidence of the criminal conspiracy. There is no motivation in any possible universe where someone guilty of criminal conspiracy burns government documents and we believe that the governments were copies.\nPlease note the word reasonable in reasonable doubt.",
">\n\n\nprovably\n\nTherein lies the problem",
">\n\nWe have ample evidence of conspiracy to subvert democracy",
">\n\nThat's not what's being discussed. We're talking about Meadows burning documents.",
">\n\nLock him up.",
">\n\nMake sure he gets a prison cell with a low flow toilet. Those things piss him off",
">\n\nGuys can't even courtesy flush because by the time they finally get that beefroll down the hatch, it's too late--the stink is everywhere by then. Not me, of course. But Bubba, next cell over--hooWEE! Let me tell you folks, it's true. This is America, can you believe it? Maybe it's fine in Gynna. Their poops are smaller, I guess. Short little people over there. Little people, little poops. And I don't like how you have to pull down the jumpsuit to drop a deuce, either. Everyone says I wear it well, though--the warden, the CO's. No one has ever looked more presidential in a jumpsuit, they say.",
">\n\nThis women deserves the credit mike pence is getting",
">\n\nIt’s really annoying that Mike Pence keeps getting any credit for anything. He showed he had a spine on the one day it matters, and then keeps trying to play the “we just need to put this behind us and focus on the “real”* issues”. Again, Mike Pence did the only thing that mattered of him on Jan 6, good. I’m glad he was there and did that.\nIt doesnt make him a good person. It doesnt make him smart. And without verbally attacking the person who sent a far right mob to kill him, he is fine with his life being put in danger for “owning the libs”. What a spineless piece of shit.\n*real meaning anything I can make up that forces democrats to react to, and usually it has nothing to do with true policy.",
">\n\nEh, you guys are just struggling to give credit where credit is due because of the R next to his name and disagreements on previous policies. Call a spade a spade, the man made a hard decision for the moment and he should be honored for it just like those that voted not to impeach Andrew Johnson in the 1860s and others that came before us who stood to keep our country hole.",
">\n\nIt’s honestly a question of if you think certifying votes should qualify as job done. I’d argue that when you see, firsthand, a fundamental threat to our democracy as the second in command you are duty bound to do more than turn the page.",
">\n\nI agree completely. I’d just like to push back that it’s a lot easier to say this on a Reddit thread than with 60,000 people screaming hang Mike Pence on your front door from constructed gallows. Anyone who says he doesn’t deserve credit is doing so because they are unable to come down from their tower.",
">\n\nThe problem with giving Pence too much credit is that it glosses over the fact that, prior to January 6th, Pence was trying really hard to do what Trump wanted. He was looking for any legal justification to not certify the election and was even entertaining the idea without one.\nIt's like giving someone a pat on the back for finally doing the right thing after they knowingly did the wrong thing.\nIn addition, that moment of courage by Pence gets completely washed away by his intransigence to comply with the investigation. All he cares about is his political ambitions.",
">\n\nMaybe so. But history will be written with Pence as a hero and that’s okay with me.",
">\n\nAnd cassidy Hutchinson should be. My original point. Yea, his co pilot through this entire shit show is a hero for doing his job. I don't feel bad for the situation they got themselves into. There were more than enough warning signs leading allll the way up to this day.",
">\n\nWelp... That's obstruction / destruction of evidence.",
">\n\nFor all the security cameras in public places you'd think we'd also have them for public offices.",
">\n\nThe difference is the people making those decisions are in the offices.",
">\n\nIt's probably more effective than flushing them.",
">\n\nOr eating them",
">\n\nOr stealing them."
] |
>
Merrick, you're up dude, jesus.
|
[
"It's only clear if one can prove they were originals, not copies. I'm all for holding them accountable but you toss the baby out with the bath water. Be rational and logical.",
">\n\nI’m sure they brunt copies because that’s what you do with incriminating evidence copy it and burn the copies. Jesus man.",
">\n\nI'm just saying... rationally speaking, if you can't prove they were original documents, you cannot jump straight to \"yep that's it, hang em\". Are the odds good that they were originals? I'd say yes, but you have to prove it.",
">\n\nHe was a participant in a criminal conspiracy and he burned documents I would vote to convict.",
">\n\nWithout evidence? What you mentioned is circumstantial. If you're willing to convict someone of a specific crime without specific evidence to back it up, you're no better than they are. You would be acting on emotion and bias rather than evidence and proof. This is how lots of people end up locked up who are actually innocent of the crime in question because they are judged based on other behavior. That is not justice served.",
">\n\nIf you provably conspired to murder someone provably and we find human blood stains on your rug its ok to consider it further proof of the same crime we already proved. \nThere is ample evidence of the criminal conspiracy. There is no motivation in any possible universe where someone guilty of criminal conspiracy burns government documents and we believe that the governments were copies.\nPlease note the word reasonable in reasonable doubt.",
">\n\n\nprovably\n\nTherein lies the problem",
">\n\nWe have ample evidence of conspiracy to subvert democracy",
">\n\nThat's not what's being discussed. We're talking about Meadows burning documents.",
">\n\nLock him up.",
">\n\nMake sure he gets a prison cell with a low flow toilet. Those things piss him off",
">\n\nGuys can't even courtesy flush because by the time they finally get that beefroll down the hatch, it's too late--the stink is everywhere by then. Not me, of course. But Bubba, next cell over--hooWEE! Let me tell you folks, it's true. This is America, can you believe it? Maybe it's fine in Gynna. Their poops are smaller, I guess. Short little people over there. Little people, little poops. And I don't like how you have to pull down the jumpsuit to drop a deuce, either. Everyone says I wear it well, though--the warden, the CO's. No one has ever looked more presidential in a jumpsuit, they say.",
">\n\nThis women deserves the credit mike pence is getting",
">\n\nIt’s really annoying that Mike Pence keeps getting any credit for anything. He showed he had a spine on the one day it matters, and then keeps trying to play the “we just need to put this behind us and focus on the “real”* issues”. Again, Mike Pence did the only thing that mattered of him on Jan 6, good. I’m glad he was there and did that.\nIt doesnt make him a good person. It doesnt make him smart. And without verbally attacking the person who sent a far right mob to kill him, he is fine with his life being put in danger for “owning the libs”. What a spineless piece of shit.\n*real meaning anything I can make up that forces democrats to react to, and usually it has nothing to do with true policy.",
">\n\nEh, you guys are just struggling to give credit where credit is due because of the R next to his name and disagreements on previous policies. Call a spade a spade, the man made a hard decision for the moment and he should be honored for it just like those that voted not to impeach Andrew Johnson in the 1860s and others that came before us who stood to keep our country hole.",
">\n\nIt’s honestly a question of if you think certifying votes should qualify as job done. I’d argue that when you see, firsthand, a fundamental threat to our democracy as the second in command you are duty bound to do more than turn the page.",
">\n\nI agree completely. I’d just like to push back that it’s a lot easier to say this on a Reddit thread than with 60,000 people screaming hang Mike Pence on your front door from constructed gallows. Anyone who says he doesn’t deserve credit is doing so because they are unable to come down from their tower.",
">\n\nThe problem with giving Pence too much credit is that it glosses over the fact that, prior to January 6th, Pence was trying really hard to do what Trump wanted. He was looking for any legal justification to not certify the election and was even entertaining the idea without one.\nIt's like giving someone a pat on the back for finally doing the right thing after they knowingly did the wrong thing.\nIn addition, that moment of courage by Pence gets completely washed away by his intransigence to comply with the investigation. All he cares about is his political ambitions.",
">\n\nMaybe so. But history will be written with Pence as a hero and that’s okay with me.",
">\n\nAnd cassidy Hutchinson should be. My original point. Yea, his co pilot through this entire shit show is a hero for doing his job. I don't feel bad for the situation they got themselves into. There were more than enough warning signs leading allll the way up to this day.",
">\n\nWelp... That's obstruction / destruction of evidence.",
">\n\nFor all the security cameras in public places you'd think we'd also have them for public offices.",
">\n\nThe difference is the people making those decisions are in the offices.",
">\n\nIt's probably more effective than flushing them.",
">\n\nOr eating them",
">\n\nOr stealing them.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 65%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nFormer Trump White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson indicated Mark Meadows, the White House chief of staff, burned documents in his fireplace roughly a dozen times in the final weeks of the administration, according to newly released transcripts of her House Jan. 6 committee depositions.\n\"The Presidential Records Act only asks that you keep the original copy of a document. So, yes,\" Hutchinson said when asked if she saw Meadows use the fireplace to burn documents.\n\"I know maybe three or four times - between two and four times, he had Mr. Perry in his office right before,\" Hutchinson told the committee, although she cautioned that she did not know what documents were burned.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Hutchinson^#1 Meadows^#2 burn^#3 document^#4 fireplace^#5"
] |
>
abdicated to jack smith to maintain independence so that the criminal process itself cannot be attacked to avoid justice.
|
[
"It's only clear if one can prove they were originals, not copies. I'm all for holding them accountable but you toss the baby out with the bath water. Be rational and logical.",
">\n\nI’m sure they brunt copies because that’s what you do with incriminating evidence copy it and burn the copies. Jesus man.",
">\n\nI'm just saying... rationally speaking, if you can't prove they were original documents, you cannot jump straight to \"yep that's it, hang em\". Are the odds good that they were originals? I'd say yes, but you have to prove it.",
">\n\nHe was a participant in a criminal conspiracy and he burned documents I would vote to convict.",
">\n\nWithout evidence? What you mentioned is circumstantial. If you're willing to convict someone of a specific crime without specific evidence to back it up, you're no better than they are. You would be acting on emotion and bias rather than evidence and proof. This is how lots of people end up locked up who are actually innocent of the crime in question because they are judged based on other behavior. That is not justice served.",
">\n\nIf you provably conspired to murder someone provably and we find human blood stains on your rug its ok to consider it further proof of the same crime we already proved. \nThere is ample evidence of the criminal conspiracy. There is no motivation in any possible universe where someone guilty of criminal conspiracy burns government documents and we believe that the governments were copies.\nPlease note the word reasonable in reasonable doubt.",
">\n\n\nprovably\n\nTherein lies the problem",
">\n\nWe have ample evidence of conspiracy to subvert democracy",
">\n\nThat's not what's being discussed. We're talking about Meadows burning documents.",
">\n\nLock him up.",
">\n\nMake sure he gets a prison cell with a low flow toilet. Those things piss him off",
">\n\nGuys can't even courtesy flush because by the time they finally get that beefroll down the hatch, it's too late--the stink is everywhere by then. Not me, of course. But Bubba, next cell over--hooWEE! Let me tell you folks, it's true. This is America, can you believe it? Maybe it's fine in Gynna. Their poops are smaller, I guess. Short little people over there. Little people, little poops. And I don't like how you have to pull down the jumpsuit to drop a deuce, either. Everyone says I wear it well, though--the warden, the CO's. No one has ever looked more presidential in a jumpsuit, they say.",
">\n\nThis women deserves the credit mike pence is getting",
">\n\nIt’s really annoying that Mike Pence keeps getting any credit for anything. He showed he had a spine on the one day it matters, and then keeps trying to play the “we just need to put this behind us and focus on the “real”* issues”. Again, Mike Pence did the only thing that mattered of him on Jan 6, good. I’m glad he was there and did that.\nIt doesnt make him a good person. It doesnt make him smart. And without verbally attacking the person who sent a far right mob to kill him, he is fine with his life being put in danger for “owning the libs”. What a spineless piece of shit.\n*real meaning anything I can make up that forces democrats to react to, and usually it has nothing to do with true policy.",
">\n\nEh, you guys are just struggling to give credit where credit is due because of the R next to his name and disagreements on previous policies. Call a spade a spade, the man made a hard decision for the moment and he should be honored for it just like those that voted not to impeach Andrew Johnson in the 1860s and others that came before us who stood to keep our country hole.",
">\n\nIt’s honestly a question of if you think certifying votes should qualify as job done. I’d argue that when you see, firsthand, a fundamental threat to our democracy as the second in command you are duty bound to do more than turn the page.",
">\n\nI agree completely. I’d just like to push back that it’s a lot easier to say this on a Reddit thread than with 60,000 people screaming hang Mike Pence on your front door from constructed gallows. Anyone who says he doesn’t deserve credit is doing so because they are unable to come down from their tower.",
">\n\nThe problem with giving Pence too much credit is that it glosses over the fact that, prior to January 6th, Pence was trying really hard to do what Trump wanted. He was looking for any legal justification to not certify the election and was even entertaining the idea without one.\nIt's like giving someone a pat on the back for finally doing the right thing after they knowingly did the wrong thing.\nIn addition, that moment of courage by Pence gets completely washed away by his intransigence to comply with the investigation. All he cares about is his political ambitions.",
">\n\nMaybe so. But history will be written with Pence as a hero and that’s okay with me.",
">\n\nAnd cassidy Hutchinson should be. My original point. Yea, his co pilot through this entire shit show is a hero for doing his job. I don't feel bad for the situation they got themselves into. There were more than enough warning signs leading allll the way up to this day.",
">\n\nWelp... That's obstruction / destruction of evidence.",
">\n\nFor all the security cameras in public places you'd think we'd also have them for public offices.",
">\n\nThe difference is the people making those decisions are in the offices.",
">\n\nIt's probably more effective than flushing them.",
">\n\nOr eating them",
">\n\nOr stealing them.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 65%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nFormer Trump White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson indicated Mark Meadows, the White House chief of staff, burned documents in his fireplace roughly a dozen times in the final weeks of the administration, according to newly released transcripts of her House Jan. 6 committee depositions.\n\"The Presidential Records Act only asks that you keep the original copy of a document. So, yes,\" Hutchinson said when asked if she saw Meadows use the fireplace to burn documents.\n\"I know maybe three or four times - between two and four times, he had Mr. Perry in his office right before,\" Hutchinson told the committee, although she cautioned that she did not know what documents were burned.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Hutchinson^#1 Meadows^#2 burn^#3 document^#4 fireplace^#5",
">\n\nMerrick, you're up dude, jesus."
] |
>
that was locker room destruction of government property. also trump has complete immunity. ALSO (somehow) he did nothing wrong.
|
[
"It's only clear if one can prove they were originals, not copies. I'm all for holding them accountable but you toss the baby out with the bath water. Be rational and logical.",
">\n\nI’m sure they brunt copies because that’s what you do with incriminating evidence copy it and burn the copies. Jesus man.",
">\n\nI'm just saying... rationally speaking, if you can't prove they were original documents, you cannot jump straight to \"yep that's it, hang em\". Are the odds good that they were originals? I'd say yes, but you have to prove it.",
">\n\nHe was a participant in a criminal conspiracy and he burned documents I would vote to convict.",
">\n\nWithout evidence? What you mentioned is circumstantial. If you're willing to convict someone of a specific crime without specific evidence to back it up, you're no better than they are. You would be acting on emotion and bias rather than evidence and proof. This is how lots of people end up locked up who are actually innocent of the crime in question because they are judged based on other behavior. That is not justice served.",
">\n\nIf you provably conspired to murder someone provably and we find human blood stains on your rug its ok to consider it further proof of the same crime we already proved. \nThere is ample evidence of the criminal conspiracy. There is no motivation in any possible universe where someone guilty of criminal conspiracy burns government documents and we believe that the governments were copies.\nPlease note the word reasonable in reasonable doubt.",
">\n\n\nprovably\n\nTherein lies the problem",
">\n\nWe have ample evidence of conspiracy to subvert democracy",
">\n\nThat's not what's being discussed. We're talking about Meadows burning documents.",
">\n\nLock him up.",
">\n\nMake sure he gets a prison cell with a low flow toilet. Those things piss him off",
">\n\nGuys can't even courtesy flush because by the time they finally get that beefroll down the hatch, it's too late--the stink is everywhere by then. Not me, of course. But Bubba, next cell over--hooWEE! Let me tell you folks, it's true. This is America, can you believe it? Maybe it's fine in Gynna. Their poops are smaller, I guess. Short little people over there. Little people, little poops. And I don't like how you have to pull down the jumpsuit to drop a deuce, either. Everyone says I wear it well, though--the warden, the CO's. No one has ever looked more presidential in a jumpsuit, they say.",
">\n\nThis women deserves the credit mike pence is getting",
">\n\nIt’s really annoying that Mike Pence keeps getting any credit for anything. He showed he had a spine on the one day it matters, and then keeps trying to play the “we just need to put this behind us and focus on the “real”* issues”. Again, Mike Pence did the only thing that mattered of him on Jan 6, good. I’m glad he was there and did that.\nIt doesnt make him a good person. It doesnt make him smart. And without verbally attacking the person who sent a far right mob to kill him, he is fine with his life being put in danger for “owning the libs”. What a spineless piece of shit.\n*real meaning anything I can make up that forces democrats to react to, and usually it has nothing to do with true policy.",
">\n\nEh, you guys are just struggling to give credit where credit is due because of the R next to his name and disagreements on previous policies. Call a spade a spade, the man made a hard decision for the moment and he should be honored for it just like those that voted not to impeach Andrew Johnson in the 1860s and others that came before us who stood to keep our country hole.",
">\n\nIt’s honestly a question of if you think certifying votes should qualify as job done. I’d argue that when you see, firsthand, a fundamental threat to our democracy as the second in command you are duty bound to do more than turn the page.",
">\n\nI agree completely. I’d just like to push back that it’s a lot easier to say this on a Reddit thread than with 60,000 people screaming hang Mike Pence on your front door from constructed gallows. Anyone who says he doesn’t deserve credit is doing so because they are unable to come down from their tower.",
">\n\nThe problem with giving Pence too much credit is that it glosses over the fact that, prior to January 6th, Pence was trying really hard to do what Trump wanted. He was looking for any legal justification to not certify the election and was even entertaining the idea without one.\nIt's like giving someone a pat on the back for finally doing the right thing after they knowingly did the wrong thing.\nIn addition, that moment of courage by Pence gets completely washed away by his intransigence to comply with the investigation. All he cares about is his political ambitions.",
">\n\nMaybe so. But history will be written with Pence as a hero and that’s okay with me.",
">\n\nAnd cassidy Hutchinson should be. My original point. Yea, his co pilot through this entire shit show is a hero for doing his job. I don't feel bad for the situation they got themselves into. There were more than enough warning signs leading allll the way up to this day.",
">\n\nWelp... That's obstruction / destruction of evidence.",
">\n\nFor all the security cameras in public places you'd think we'd also have them for public offices.",
">\n\nThe difference is the people making those decisions are in the offices.",
">\n\nIt's probably more effective than flushing them.",
">\n\nOr eating them",
">\n\nOr stealing them.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 65%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nFormer Trump White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson indicated Mark Meadows, the White House chief of staff, burned documents in his fireplace roughly a dozen times in the final weeks of the administration, according to newly released transcripts of her House Jan. 6 committee depositions.\n\"The Presidential Records Act only asks that you keep the original copy of a document. So, yes,\" Hutchinson said when asked if she saw Meadows use the fireplace to burn documents.\n\"I know maybe three or four times - between two and four times, he had Mr. Perry in his office right before,\" Hutchinson told the committee, although she cautioned that she did not know what documents were burned.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Hutchinson^#1 Meadows^#2 burn^#3 document^#4 fireplace^#5",
">\n\nMerrick, you're up dude, jesus.",
">\n\nabdicated to jack smith to maintain independence so that the criminal process itself cannot be attacked to avoid justice."
] |
>
I would assume that any document given to Mark Meadows was printed off and must be on a hard drive somewhere right? It's not the olden days when records were stored only on paper. So why was MM burning them?
|
[
"It's only clear if one can prove they were originals, not copies. I'm all for holding them accountable but you toss the baby out with the bath water. Be rational and logical.",
">\n\nI’m sure they brunt copies because that’s what you do with incriminating evidence copy it and burn the copies. Jesus man.",
">\n\nI'm just saying... rationally speaking, if you can't prove they were original documents, you cannot jump straight to \"yep that's it, hang em\". Are the odds good that they were originals? I'd say yes, but you have to prove it.",
">\n\nHe was a participant in a criminal conspiracy and he burned documents I would vote to convict.",
">\n\nWithout evidence? What you mentioned is circumstantial. If you're willing to convict someone of a specific crime without specific evidence to back it up, you're no better than they are. You would be acting on emotion and bias rather than evidence and proof. This is how lots of people end up locked up who are actually innocent of the crime in question because they are judged based on other behavior. That is not justice served.",
">\n\nIf you provably conspired to murder someone provably and we find human blood stains on your rug its ok to consider it further proof of the same crime we already proved. \nThere is ample evidence of the criminal conspiracy. There is no motivation in any possible universe where someone guilty of criminal conspiracy burns government documents and we believe that the governments were copies.\nPlease note the word reasonable in reasonable doubt.",
">\n\n\nprovably\n\nTherein lies the problem",
">\n\nWe have ample evidence of conspiracy to subvert democracy",
">\n\nThat's not what's being discussed. We're talking about Meadows burning documents.",
">\n\nLock him up.",
">\n\nMake sure he gets a prison cell with a low flow toilet. Those things piss him off",
">\n\nGuys can't even courtesy flush because by the time they finally get that beefroll down the hatch, it's too late--the stink is everywhere by then. Not me, of course. But Bubba, next cell over--hooWEE! Let me tell you folks, it's true. This is America, can you believe it? Maybe it's fine in Gynna. Their poops are smaller, I guess. Short little people over there. Little people, little poops. And I don't like how you have to pull down the jumpsuit to drop a deuce, either. Everyone says I wear it well, though--the warden, the CO's. No one has ever looked more presidential in a jumpsuit, they say.",
">\n\nThis women deserves the credit mike pence is getting",
">\n\nIt’s really annoying that Mike Pence keeps getting any credit for anything. He showed he had a spine on the one day it matters, and then keeps trying to play the “we just need to put this behind us and focus on the “real”* issues”. Again, Mike Pence did the only thing that mattered of him on Jan 6, good. I’m glad he was there and did that.\nIt doesnt make him a good person. It doesnt make him smart. And without verbally attacking the person who sent a far right mob to kill him, he is fine with his life being put in danger for “owning the libs”. What a spineless piece of shit.\n*real meaning anything I can make up that forces democrats to react to, and usually it has nothing to do with true policy.",
">\n\nEh, you guys are just struggling to give credit where credit is due because of the R next to his name and disagreements on previous policies. Call a spade a spade, the man made a hard decision for the moment and he should be honored for it just like those that voted not to impeach Andrew Johnson in the 1860s and others that came before us who stood to keep our country hole.",
">\n\nIt’s honestly a question of if you think certifying votes should qualify as job done. I’d argue that when you see, firsthand, a fundamental threat to our democracy as the second in command you are duty bound to do more than turn the page.",
">\n\nI agree completely. I’d just like to push back that it’s a lot easier to say this on a Reddit thread than with 60,000 people screaming hang Mike Pence on your front door from constructed gallows. Anyone who says he doesn’t deserve credit is doing so because they are unable to come down from their tower.",
">\n\nThe problem with giving Pence too much credit is that it glosses over the fact that, prior to January 6th, Pence was trying really hard to do what Trump wanted. He was looking for any legal justification to not certify the election and was even entertaining the idea without one.\nIt's like giving someone a pat on the back for finally doing the right thing after they knowingly did the wrong thing.\nIn addition, that moment of courage by Pence gets completely washed away by his intransigence to comply with the investigation. All he cares about is his political ambitions.",
">\n\nMaybe so. But history will be written with Pence as a hero and that’s okay with me.",
">\n\nAnd cassidy Hutchinson should be. My original point. Yea, his co pilot through this entire shit show is a hero for doing his job. I don't feel bad for the situation they got themselves into. There were more than enough warning signs leading allll the way up to this day.",
">\n\nWelp... That's obstruction / destruction of evidence.",
">\n\nFor all the security cameras in public places you'd think we'd also have them for public offices.",
">\n\nThe difference is the people making those decisions are in the offices.",
">\n\nIt's probably more effective than flushing them.",
">\n\nOr eating them",
">\n\nOr stealing them.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 65%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nFormer Trump White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson indicated Mark Meadows, the White House chief of staff, burned documents in his fireplace roughly a dozen times in the final weeks of the administration, according to newly released transcripts of her House Jan. 6 committee depositions.\n\"The Presidential Records Act only asks that you keep the original copy of a document. So, yes,\" Hutchinson said when asked if she saw Meadows use the fireplace to burn documents.\n\"I know maybe three or four times - between two and four times, he had Mr. Perry in his office right before,\" Hutchinson told the committee, although she cautioned that she did not know what documents were burned.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Hutchinson^#1 Meadows^#2 burn^#3 document^#4 fireplace^#5",
">\n\nMerrick, you're up dude, jesus.",
">\n\nabdicated to jack smith to maintain independence so that the criminal process itself cannot be attacked to avoid justice.",
">\n\nthat was locker room destruction of government property. also trump has complete immunity. ALSO (somehow) he did nothing wrong."
] |
>
Handwritten memos, received old school faxes, typewritten single copies.
Although I did buy a used fax machine years ago that came from a gov’t office and stored on the carbon roll were months of a provincial cabinet minister’s outgoing communications.
|
[
"It's only clear if one can prove they were originals, not copies. I'm all for holding them accountable but you toss the baby out with the bath water. Be rational and logical.",
">\n\nI’m sure they brunt copies because that’s what you do with incriminating evidence copy it and burn the copies. Jesus man.",
">\n\nI'm just saying... rationally speaking, if you can't prove they were original documents, you cannot jump straight to \"yep that's it, hang em\". Are the odds good that they were originals? I'd say yes, but you have to prove it.",
">\n\nHe was a participant in a criminal conspiracy and he burned documents I would vote to convict.",
">\n\nWithout evidence? What you mentioned is circumstantial. If you're willing to convict someone of a specific crime without specific evidence to back it up, you're no better than they are. You would be acting on emotion and bias rather than evidence and proof. This is how lots of people end up locked up who are actually innocent of the crime in question because they are judged based on other behavior. That is not justice served.",
">\n\nIf you provably conspired to murder someone provably and we find human blood stains on your rug its ok to consider it further proof of the same crime we already proved. \nThere is ample evidence of the criminal conspiracy. There is no motivation in any possible universe where someone guilty of criminal conspiracy burns government documents and we believe that the governments were copies.\nPlease note the word reasonable in reasonable doubt.",
">\n\n\nprovably\n\nTherein lies the problem",
">\n\nWe have ample evidence of conspiracy to subvert democracy",
">\n\nThat's not what's being discussed. We're talking about Meadows burning documents.",
">\n\nLock him up.",
">\n\nMake sure he gets a prison cell with a low flow toilet. Those things piss him off",
">\n\nGuys can't even courtesy flush because by the time they finally get that beefroll down the hatch, it's too late--the stink is everywhere by then. Not me, of course. But Bubba, next cell over--hooWEE! Let me tell you folks, it's true. This is America, can you believe it? Maybe it's fine in Gynna. Their poops are smaller, I guess. Short little people over there. Little people, little poops. And I don't like how you have to pull down the jumpsuit to drop a deuce, either. Everyone says I wear it well, though--the warden, the CO's. No one has ever looked more presidential in a jumpsuit, they say.",
">\n\nThis women deserves the credit mike pence is getting",
">\n\nIt’s really annoying that Mike Pence keeps getting any credit for anything. He showed he had a spine on the one day it matters, and then keeps trying to play the “we just need to put this behind us and focus on the “real”* issues”. Again, Mike Pence did the only thing that mattered of him on Jan 6, good. I’m glad he was there and did that.\nIt doesnt make him a good person. It doesnt make him smart. And without verbally attacking the person who sent a far right mob to kill him, he is fine with his life being put in danger for “owning the libs”. What a spineless piece of shit.\n*real meaning anything I can make up that forces democrats to react to, and usually it has nothing to do with true policy.",
">\n\nEh, you guys are just struggling to give credit where credit is due because of the R next to his name and disagreements on previous policies. Call a spade a spade, the man made a hard decision for the moment and he should be honored for it just like those that voted not to impeach Andrew Johnson in the 1860s and others that came before us who stood to keep our country hole.",
">\n\nIt’s honestly a question of if you think certifying votes should qualify as job done. I’d argue that when you see, firsthand, a fundamental threat to our democracy as the second in command you are duty bound to do more than turn the page.",
">\n\nI agree completely. I’d just like to push back that it’s a lot easier to say this on a Reddit thread than with 60,000 people screaming hang Mike Pence on your front door from constructed gallows. Anyone who says he doesn’t deserve credit is doing so because they are unable to come down from their tower.",
">\n\nThe problem with giving Pence too much credit is that it glosses over the fact that, prior to January 6th, Pence was trying really hard to do what Trump wanted. He was looking for any legal justification to not certify the election and was even entertaining the idea without one.\nIt's like giving someone a pat on the back for finally doing the right thing after they knowingly did the wrong thing.\nIn addition, that moment of courage by Pence gets completely washed away by his intransigence to comply with the investigation. All he cares about is his political ambitions.",
">\n\nMaybe so. But history will be written with Pence as a hero and that’s okay with me.",
">\n\nAnd cassidy Hutchinson should be. My original point. Yea, his co pilot through this entire shit show is a hero for doing his job. I don't feel bad for the situation they got themselves into. There were more than enough warning signs leading allll the way up to this day.",
">\n\nWelp... That's obstruction / destruction of evidence.",
">\n\nFor all the security cameras in public places you'd think we'd also have them for public offices.",
">\n\nThe difference is the people making those decisions are in the offices.",
">\n\nIt's probably more effective than flushing them.",
">\n\nOr eating them",
">\n\nOr stealing them.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 65%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nFormer Trump White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson indicated Mark Meadows, the White House chief of staff, burned documents in his fireplace roughly a dozen times in the final weeks of the administration, according to newly released transcripts of her House Jan. 6 committee depositions.\n\"The Presidential Records Act only asks that you keep the original copy of a document. So, yes,\" Hutchinson said when asked if she saw Meadows use the fireplace to burn documents.\n\"I know maybe three or four times - between two and four times, he had Mr. Perry in his office right before,\" Hutchinson told the committee, although she cautioned that she did not know what documents were burned.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Hutchinson^#1 Meadows^#2 burn^#3 document^#4 fireplace^#5",
">\n\nMerrick, you're up dude, jesus.",
">\n\nabdicated to jack smith to maintain independence so that the criminal process itself cannot be attacked to avoid justice.",
">\n\nthat was locker room destruction of government property. also trump has complete immunity. ALSO (somehow) he did nothing wrong.",
">\n\nI would assume that any document given to Mark Meadows was printed off and must be on a hard drive somewhere right? It's not the olden days when records were stored only on paper. So why was MM burning them?"
] |
>
She’s very brave and I hope she can continue speaking truth to this national embarrassment
|
[
"It's only clear if one can prove they were originals, not copies. I'm all for holding them accountable but you toss the baby out with the bath water. Be rational and logical.",
">\n\nI’m sure they brunt copies because that’s what you do with incriminating evidence copy it and burn the copies. Jesus man.",
">\n\nI'm just saying... rationally speaking, if you can't prove they were original documents, you cannot jump straight to \"yep that's it, hang em\". Are the odds good that they were originals? I'd say yes, but you have to prove it.",
">\n\nHe was a participant in a criminal conspiracy and he burned documents I would vote to convict.",
">\n\nWithout evidence? What you mentioned is circumstantial. If you're willing to convict someone of a specific crime without specific evidence to back it up, you're no better than they are. You would be acting on emotion and bias rather than evidence and proof. This is how lots of people end up locked up who are actually innocent of the crime in question because they are judged based on other behavior. That is not justice served.",
">\n\nIf you provably conspired to murder someone provably and we find human blood stains on your rug its ok to consider it further proof of the same crime we already proved. \nThere is ample evidence of the criminal conspiracy. There is no motivation in any possible universe where someone guilty of criminal conspiracy burns government documents and we believe that the governments were copies.\nPlease note the word reasonable in reasonable doubt.",
">\n\n\nprovably\n\nTherein lies the problem",
">\n\nWe have ample evidence of conspiracy to subvert democracy",
">\n\nThat's not what's being discussed. We're talking about Meadows burning documents.",
">\n\nLock him up.",
">\n\nMake sure he gets a prison cell with a low flow toilet. Those things piss him off",
">\n\nGuys can't even courtesy flush because by the time they finally get that beefroll down the hatch, it's too late--the stink is everywhere by then. Not me, of course. But Bubba, next cell over--hooWEE! Let me tell you folks, it's true. This is America, can you believe it? Maybe it's fine in Gynna. Their poops are smaller, I guess. Short little people over there. Little people, little poops. And I don't like how you have to pull down the jumpsuit to drop a deuce, either. Everyone says I wear it well, though--the warden, the CO's. No one has ever looked more presidential in a jumpsuit, they say.",
">\n\nThis women deserves the credit mike pence is getting",
">\n\nIt’s really annoying that Mike Pence keeps getting any credit for anything. He showed he had a spine on the one day it matters, and then keeps trying to play the “we just need to put this behind us and focus on the “real”* issues”. Again, Mike Pence did the only thing that mattered of him on Jan 6, good. I’m glad he was there and did that.\nIt doesnt make him a good person. It doesnt make him smart. And without verbally attacking the person who sent a far right mob to kill him, he is fine with his life being put in danger for “owning the libs”. What a spineless piece of shit.\n*real meaning anything I can make up that forces democrats to react to, and usually it has nothing to do with true policy.",
">\n\nEh, you guys are just struggling to give credit where credit is due because of the R next to his name and disagreements on previous policies. Call a spade a spade, the man made a hard decision for the moment and he should be honored for it just like those that voted not to impeach Andrew Johnson in the 1860s and others that came before us who stood to keep our country hole.",
">\n\nIt’s honestly a question of if you think certifying votes should qualify as job done. I’d argue that when you see, firsthand, a fundamental threat to our democracy as the second in command you are duty bound to do more than turn the page.",
">\n\nI agree completely. I’d just like to push back that it’s a lot easier to say this on a Reddit thread than with 60,000 people screaming hang Mike Pence on your front door from constructed gallows. Anyone who says he doesn’t deserve credit is doing so because they are unable to come down from their tower.",
">\n\nThe problem with giving Pence too much credit is that it glosses over the fact that, prior to January 6th, Pence was trying really hard to do what Trump wanted. He was looking for any legal justification to not certify the election and was even entertaining the idea without one.\nIt's like giving someone a pat on the back for finally doing the right thing after they knowingly did the wrong thing.\nIn addition, that moment of courage by Pence gets completely washed away by his intransigence to comply with the investigation. All he cares about is his political ambitions.",
">\n\nMaybe so. But history will be written with Pence as a hero and that’s okay with me.",
">\n\nAnd cassidy Hutchinson should be. My original point. Yea, his co pilot through this entire shit show is a hero for doing his job. I don't feel bad for the situation they got themselves into. There were more than enough warning signs leading allll the way up to this day.",
">\n\nWelp... That's obstruction / destruction of evidence.",
">\n\nFor all the security cameras in public places you'd think we'd also have them for public offices.",
">\n\nThe difference is the people making those decisions are in the offices.",
">\n\nIt's probably more effective than flushing them.",
">\n\nOr eating them",
">\n\nOr stealing them.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 65%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nFormer Trump White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson indicated Mark Meadows, the White House chief of staff, burned documents in his fireplace roughly a dozen times in the final weeks of the administration, according to newly released transcripts of her House Jan. 6 committee depositions.\n\"The Presidential Records Act only asks that you keep the original copy of a document. So, yes,\" Hutchinson said when asked if she saw Meadows use the fireplace to burn documents.\n\"I know maybe three or four times - between two and four times, he had Mr. Perry in his office right before,\" Hutchinson told the committee, although she cautioned that she did not know what documents were burned.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Hutchinson^#1 Meadows^#2 burn^#3 document^#4 fireplace^#5",
">\n\nMerrick, you're up dude, jesus.",
">\n\nabdicated to jack smith to maintain independence so that the criminal process itself cannot be attacked to avoid justice.",
">\n\nthat was locker room destruction of government property. also trump has complete immunity. ALSO (somehow) he did nothing wrong.",
">\n\nI would assume that any document given to Mark Meadows was printed off and must be on a hard drive somewhere right? It's not the olden days when records were stored only on paper. So why was MM burning them?",
">\n\nHandwritten memos, received old school faxes, typewritten single copies. \nAlthough I did buy a used fax machine years ago that came from a gov’t office and stored on the carbon roll were months of a provincial cabinet minister’s outgoing communications."
] |
>
This seems rather early 20th century don't you think? Republicans......ever behind the times. LOL.
|
[
"It's only clear if one can prove they were originals, not copies. I'm all for holding them accountable but you toss the baby out with the bath water. Be rational and logical.",
">\n\nI’m sure they brunt copies because that’s what you do with incriminating evidence copy it and burn the copies. Jesus man.",
">\n\nI'm just saying... rationally speaking, if you can't prove they were original documents, you cannot jump straight to \"yep that's it, hang em\". Are the odds good that they were originals? I'd say yes, but you have to prove it.",
">\n\nHe was a participant in a criminal conspiracy and he burned documents I would vote to convict.",
">\n\nWithout evidence? What you mentioned is circumstantial. If you're willing to convict someone of a specific crime without specific evidence to back it up, you're no better than they are. You would be acting on emotion and bias rather than evidence and proof. This is how lots of people end up locked up who are actually innocent of the crime in question because they are judged based on other behavior. That is not justice served.",
">\n\nIf you provably conspired to murder someone provably and we find human blood stains on your rug its ok to consider it further proof of the same crime we already proved. \nThere is ample evidence of the criminal conspiracy. There is no motivation in any possible universe where someone guilty of criminal conspiracy burns government documents and we believe that the governments were copies.\nPlease note the word reasonable in reasonable doubt.",
">\n\n\nprovably\n\nTherein lies the problem",
">\n\nWe have ample evidence of conspiracy to subvert democracy",
">\n\nThat's not what's being discussed. We're talking about Meadows burning documents.",
">\n\nLock him up.",
">\n\nMake sure he gets a prison cell with a low flow toilet. Those things piss him off",
">\n\nGuys can't even courtesy flush because by the time they finally get that beefroll down the hatch, it's too late--the stink is everywhere by then. Not me, of course. But Bubba, next cell over--hooWEE! Let me tell you folks, it's true. This is America, can you believe it? Maybe it's fine in Gynna. Their poops are smaller, I guess. Short little people over there. Little people, little poops. And I don't like how you have to pull down the jumpsuit to drop a deuce, either. Everyone says I wear it well, though--the warden, the CO's. No one has ever looked more presidential in a jumpsuit, they say.",
">\n\nThis women deserves the credit mike pence is getting",
">\n\nIt’s really annoying that Mike Pence keeps getting any credit for anything. He showed he had a spine on the one day it matters, and then keeps trying to play the “we just need to put this behind us and focus on the “real”* issues”. Again, Mike Pence did the only thing that mattered of him on Jan 6, good. I’m glad he was there and did that.\nIt doesnt make him a good person. It doesnt make him smart. And without verbally attacking the person who sent a far right mob to kill him, he is fine with his life being put in danger for “owning the libs”. What a spineless piece of shit.\n*real meaning anything I can make up that forces democrats to react to, and usually it has nothing to do with true policy.",
">\n\nEh, you guys are just struggling to give credit where credit is due because of the R next to his name and disagreements on previous policies. Call a spade a spade, the man made a hard decision for the moment and he should be honored for it just like those that voted not to impeach Andrew Johnson in the 1860s and others that came before us who stood to keep our country hole.",
">\n\nIt’s honestly a question of if you think certifying votes should qualify as job done. I’d argue that when you see, firsthand, a fundamental threat to our democracy as the second in command you are duty bound to do more than turn the page.",
">\n\nI agree completely. I’d just like to push back that it’s a lot easier to say this on a Reddit thread than with 60,000 people screaming hang Mike Pence on your front door from constructed gallows. Anyone who says he doesn’t deserve credit is doing so because they are unable to come down from their tower.",
">\n\nThe problem with giving Pence too much credit is that it glosses over the fact that, prior to January 6th, Pence was trying really hard to do what Trump wanted. He was looking for any legal justification to not certify the election and was even entertaining the idea without one.\nIt's like giving someone a pat on the back for finally doing the right thing after they knowingly did the wrong thing.\nIn addition, that moment of courage by Pence gets completely washed away by his intransigence to comply with the investigation. All he cares about is his political ambitions.",
">\n\nMaybe so. But history will be written with Pence as a hero and that’s okay with me.",
">\n\nAnd cassidy Hutchinson should be. My original point. Yea, his co pilot through this entire shit show is a hero for doing his job. I don't feel bad for the situation they got themselves into. There were more than enough warning signs leading allll the way up to this day.",
">\n\nWelp... That's obstruction / destruction of evidence.",
">\n\nFor all the security cameras in public places you'd think we'd also have them for public offices.",
">\n\nThe difference is the people making those decisions are in the offices.",
">\n\nIt's probably more effective than flushing them.",
">\n\nOr eating them",
">\n\nOr stealing them.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 65%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nFormer Trump White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson indicated Mark Meadows, the White House chief of staff, burned documents in his fireplace roughly a dozen times in the final weeks of the administration, according to newly released transcripts of her House Jan. 6 committee depositions.\n\"The Presidential Records Act only asks that you keep the original copy of a document. So, yes,\" Hutchinson said when asked if she saw Meadows use the fireplace to burn documents.\n\"I know maybe three or four times - between two and four times, he had Mr. Perry in his office right before,\" Hutchinson told the committee, although she cautioned that she did not know what documents were burned.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Hutchinson^#1 Meadows^#2 burn^#3 document^#4 fireplace^#5",
">\n\nMerrick, you're up dude, jesus.",
">\n\nabdicated to jack smith to maintain independence so that the criminal process itself cannot be attacked to avoid justice.",
">\n\nthat was locker room destruction of government property. also trump has complete immunity. ALSO (somehow) he did nothing wrong.",
">\n\nI would assume that any document given to Mark Meadows was printed off and must be on a hard drive somewhere right? It's not the olden days when records were stored only on paper. So why was MM burning them?",
">\n\nHandwritten memos, received old school faxes, typewritten single copies. \nAlthough I did buy a used fax machine years ago that came from a gov’t office and stored on the carbon roll were months of a provincial cabinet minister’s outgoing communications.",
">\n\nShe’s very brave and I hope she can continue speaking truth to this national embarrassment"
] |
>
Truly the Internet Explorer of political parties.
|
[
"It's only clear if one can prove they were originals, not copies. I'm all for holding them accountable but you toss the baby out with the bath water. Be rational and logical.",
">\n\nI’m sure they brunt copies because that’s what you do with incriminating evidence copy it and burn the copies. Jesus man.",
">\n\nI'm just saying... rationally speaking, if you can't prove they were original documents, you cannot jump straight to \"yep that's it, hang em\". Are the odds good that they were originals? I'd say yes, but you have to prove it.",
">\n\nHe was a participant in a criminal conspiracy and he burned documents I would vote to convict.",
">\n\nWithout evidence? What you mentioned is circumstantial. If you're willing to convict someone of a specific crime without specific evidence to back it up, you're no better than they are. You would be acting on emotion and bias rather than evidence and proof. This is how lots of people end up locked up who are actually innocent of the crime in question because they are judged based on other behavior. That is not justice served.",
">\n\nIf you provably conspired to murder someone provably and we find human blood stains on your rug its ok to consider it further proof of the same crime we already proved. \nThere is ample evidence of the criminal conspiracy. There is no motivation in any possible universe where someone guilty of criminal conspiracy burns government documents and we believe that the governments were copies.\nPlease note the word reasonable in reasonable doubt.",
">\n\n\nprovably\n\nTherein lies the problem",
">\n\nWe have ample evidence of conspiracy to subvert democracy",
">\n\nThat's not what's being discussed. We're talking about Meadows burning documents.",
">\n\nLock him up.",
">\n\nMake sure he gets a prison cell with a low flow toilet. Those things piss him off",
">\n\nGuys can't even courtesy flush because by the time they finally get that beefroll down the hatch, it's too late--the stink is everywhere by then. Not me, of course. But Bubba, next cell over--hooWEE! Let me tell you folks, it's true. This is America, can you believe it? Maybe it's fine in Gynna. Their poops are smaller, I guess. Short little people over there. Little people, little poops. And I don't like how you have to pull down the jumpsuit to drop a deuce, either. Everyone says I wear it well, though--the warden, the CO's. No one has ever looked more presidential in a jumpsuit, they say.",
">\n\nThis women deserves the credit mike pence is getting",
">\n\nIt’s really annoying that Mike Pence keeps getting any credit for anything. He showed he had a spine on the one day it matters, and then keeps trying to play the “we just need to put this behind us and focus on the “real”* issues”. Again, Mike Pence did the only thing that mattered of him on Jan 6, good. I’m glad he was there and did that.\nIt doesnt make him a good person. It doesnt make him smart. And without verbally attacking the person who sent a far right mob to kill him, he is fine with his life being put in danger for “owning the libs”. What a spineless piece of shit.\n*real meaning anything I can make up that forces democrats to react to, and usually it has nothing to do with true policy.",
">\n\nEh, you guys are just struggling to give credit where credit is due because of the R next to his name and disagreements on previous policies. Call a spade a spade, the man made a hard decision for the moment and he should be honored for it just like those that voted not to impeach Andrew Johnson in the 1860s and others that came before us who stood to keep our country hole.",
">\n\nIt’s honestly a question of if you think certifying votes should qualify as job done. I’d argue that when you see, firsthand, a fundamental threat to our democracy as the second in command you are duty bound to do more than turn the page.",
">\n\nI agree completely. I’d just like to push back that it’s a lot easier to say this on a Reddit thread than with 60,000 people screaming hang Mike Pence on your front door from constructed gallows. Anyone who says he doesn’t deserve credit is doing so because they are unable to come down from their tower.",
">\n\nThe problem with giving Pence too much credit is that it glosses over the fact that, prior to January 6th, Pence was trying really hard to do what Trump wanted. He was looking for any legal justification to not certify the election and was even entertaining the idea without one.\nIt's like giving someone a pat on the back for finally doing the right thing after they knowingly did the wrong thing.\nIn addition, that moment of courage by Pence gets completely washed away by his intransigence to comply with the investigation. All he cares about is his political ambitions.",
">\n\nMaybe so. But history will be written with Pence as a hero and that’s okay with me.",
">\n\nAnd cassidy Hutchinson should be. My original point. Yea, his co pilot through this entire shit show is a hero for doing his job. I don't feel bad for the situation they got themselves into. There were more than enough warning signs leading allll the way up to this day.",
">\n\nWelp... That's obstruction / destruction of evidence.",
">\n\nFor all the security cameras in public places you'd think we'd also have them for public offices.",
">\n\nThe difference is the people making those decisions are in the offices.",
">\n\nIt's probably more effective than flushing them.",
">\n\nOr eating them",
">\n\nOr stealing them.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 65%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nFormer Trump White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson indicated Mark Meadows, the White House chief of staff, burned documents in his fireplace roughly a dozen times in the final weeks of the administration, according to newly released transcripts of her House Jan. 6 committee depositions.\n\"The Presidential Records Act only asks that you keep the original copy of a document. So, yes,\" Hutchinson said when asked if she saw Meadows use the fireplace to burn documents.\n\"I know maybe three or four times - between two and four times, he had Mr. Perry in his office right before,\" Hutchinson told the committee, although she cautioned that she did not know what documents were burned.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Hutchinson^#1 Meadows^#2 burn^#3 document^#4 fireplace^#5",
">\n\nMerrick, you're up dude, jesus.",
">\n\nabdicated to jack smith to maintain independence so that the criminal process itself cannot be attacked to avoid justice.",
">\n\nthat was locker room destruction of government property. also trump has complete immunity. ALSO (somehow) he did nothing wrong.",
">\n\nI would assume that any document given to Mark Meadows was printed off and must be on a hard drive somewhere right? It's not the olden days when records were stored only on paper. So why was MM burning them?",
">\n\nHandwritten memos, received old school faxes, typewritten single copies. \nAlthough I did buy a used fax machine years ago that came from a gov’t office and stored on the carbon roll were months of a provincial cabinet minister’s outgoing communications.",
">\n\nShe’s very brave and I hope she can continue speaking truth to this national embarrassment",
">\n\nThis seems rather early 20th century don't you think? Republicans......ever behind the times. LOL."
] |
>
The political party of AOL dialup.
|
[
"It's only clear if one can prove they were originals, not copies. I'm all for holding them accountable but you toss the baby out with the bath water. Be rational and logical.",
">\n\nI’m sure they brunt copies because that’s what you do with incriminating evidence copy it and burn the copies. Jesus man.",
">\n\nI'm just saying... rationally speaking, if you can't prove they were original documents, you cannot jump straight to \"yep that's it, hang em\". Are the odds good that they were originals? I'd say yes, but you have to prove it.",
">\n\nHe was a participant in a criminal conspiracy and he burned documents I would vote to convict.",
">\n\nWithout evidence? What you mentioned is circumstantial. If you're willing to convict someone of a specific crime without specific evidence to back it up, you're no better than they are. You would be acting on emotion and bias rather than evidence and proof. This is how lots of people end up locked up who are actually innocent of the crime in question because they are judged based on other behavior. That is not justice served.",
">\n\nIf you provably conspired to murder someone provably and we find human blood stains on your rug its ok to consider it further proof of the same crime we already proved. \nThere is ample evidence of the criminal conspiracy. There is no motivation in any possible universe where someone guilty of criminal conspiracy burns government documents and we believe that the governments were copies.\nPlease note the word reasonable in reasonable doubt.",
">\n\n\nprovably\n\nTherein lies the problem",
">\n\nWe have ample evidence of conspiracy to subvert democracy",
">\n\nThat's not what's being discussed. We're talking about Meadows burning documents.",
">\n\nLock him up.",
">\n\nMake sure he gets a prison cell with a low flow toilet. Those things piss him off",
">\n\nGuys can't even courtesy flush because by the time they finally get that beefroll down the hatch, it's too late--the stink is everywhere by then. Not me, of course. But Bubba, next cell over--hooWEE! Let me tell you folks, it's true. This is America, can you believe it? Maybe it's fine in Gynna. Their poops are smaller, I guess. Short little people over there. Little people, little poops. And I don't like how you have to pull down the jumpsuit to drop a deuce, either. Everyone says I wear it well, though--the warden, the CO's. No one has ever looked more presidential in a jumpsuit, they say.",
">\n\nThis women deserves the credit mike pence is getting",
">\n\nIt’s really annoying that Mike Pence keeps getting any credit for anything. He showed he had a spine on the one day it matters, and then keeps trying to play the “we just need to put this behind us and focus on the “real”* issues”. Again, Mike Pence did the only thing that mattered of him on Jan 6, good. I’m glad he was there and did that.\nIt doesnt make him a good person. It doesnt make him smart. And without verbally attacking the person who sent a far right mob to kill him, he is fine with his life being put in danger for “owning the libs”. What a spineless piece of shit.\n*real meaning anything I can make up that forces democrats to react to, and usually it has nothing to do with true policy.",
">\n\nEh, you guys are just struggling to give credit where credit is due because of the R next to his name and disagreements on previous policies. Call a spade a spade, the man made a hard decision for the moment and he should be honored for it just like those that voted not to impeach Andrew Johnson in the 1860s and others that came before us who stood to keep our country hole.",
">\n\nIt’s honestly a question of if you think certifying votes should qualify as job done. I’d argue that when you see, firsthand, a fundamental threat to our democracy as the second in command you are duty bound to do more than turn the page.",
">\n\nI agree completely. I’d just like to push back that it’s a lot easier to say this on a Reddit thread than with 60,000 people screaming hang Mike Pence on your front door from constructed gallows. Anyone who says he doesn’t deserve credit is doing so because they are unable to come down from their tower.",
">\n\nThe problem with giving Pence too much credit is that it glosses over the fact that, prior to January 6th, Pence was trying really hard to do what Trump wanted. He was looking for any legal justification to not certify the election and was even entertaining the idea without one.\nIt's like giving someone a pat on the back for finally doing the right thing after they knowingly did the wrong thing.\nIn addition, that moment of courage by Pence gets completely washed away by his intransigence to comply with the investigation. All he cares about is his political ambitions.",
">\n\nMaybe so. But history will be written with Pence as a hero and that’s okay with me.",
">\n\nAnd cassidy Hutchinson should be. My original point. Yea, his co pilot through this entire shit show is a hero for doing his job. I don't feel bad for the situation they got themselves into. There were more than enough warning signs leading allll the way up to this day.",
">\n\nWelp... That's obstruction / destruction of evidence.",
">\n\nFor all the security cameras in public places you'd think we'd also have them for public offices.",
">\n\nThe difference is the people making those decisions are in the offices.",
">\n\nIt's probably more effective than flushing them.",
">\n\nOr eating them",
">\n\nOr stealing them.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 65%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nFormer Trump White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson indicated Mark Meadows, the White House chief of staff, burned documents in his fireplace roughly a dozen times in the final weeks of the administration, according to newly released transcripts of her House Jan. 6 committee depositions.\n\"The Presidential Records Act only asks that you keep the original copy of a document. So, yes,\" Hutchinson said when asked if she saw Meadows use the fireplace to burn documents.\n\"I know maybe three or four times - between two and four times, he had Mr. Perry in his office right before,\" Hutchinson told the committee, although she cautioned that she did not know what documents were burned.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Hutchinson^#1 Meadows^#2 burn^#3 document^#4 fireplace^#5",
">\n\nMerrick, you're up dude, jesus.",
">\n\nabdicated to jack smith to maintain independence so that the criminal process itself cannot be attacked to avoid justice.",
">\n\nthat was locker room destruction of government property. also trump has complete immunity. ALSO (somehow) he did nothing wrong.",
">\n\nI would assume that any document given to Mark Meadows was printed off and must be on a hard drive somewhere right? It's not the olden days when records were stored only on paper. So why was MM burning them?",
">\n\nHandwritten memos, received old school faxes, typewritten single copies. \nAlthough I did buy a used fax machine years ago that came from a gov’t office and stored on the carbon roll were months of a provincial cabinet minister’s outgoing communications.",
">\n\nShe’s very brave and I hope she can continue speaking truth to this national embarrassment",
">\n\nThis seems rather early 20th century don't you think? Republicans......ever behind the times. LOL.",
">\n\nTruly the Internet Explorer of political parties."
] |
>
Brought to you by Carl’s Jr.
|
[
"It's only clear if one can prove they were originals, not copies. I'm all for holding them accountable but you toss the baby out with the bath water. Be rational and logical.",
">\n\nI’m sure they brunt copies because that’s what you do with incriminating evidence copy it and burn the copies. Jesus man.",
">\n\nI'm just saying... rationally speaking, if you can't prove they were original documents, you cannot jump straight to \"yep that's it, hang em\". Are the odds good that they were originals? I'd say yes, but you have to prove it.",
">\n\nHe was a participant in a criminal conspiracy and he burned documents I would vote to convict.",
">\n\nWithout evidence? What you mentioned is circumstantial. If you're willing to convict someone of a specific crime without specific evidence to back it up, you're no better than they are. You would be acting on emotion and bias rather than evidence and proof. This is how lots of people end up locked up who are actually innocent of the crime in question because they are judged based on other behavior. That is not justice served.",
">\n\nIf you provably conspired to murder someone provably and we find human blood stains on your rug its ok to consider it further proof of the same crime we already proved. \nThere is ample evidence of the criminal conspiracy. There is no motivation in any possible universe where someone guilty of criminal conspiracy burns government documents and we believe that the governments were copies.\nPlease note the word reasonable in reasonable doubt.",
">\n\n\nprovably\n\nTherein lies the problem",
">\n\nWe have ample evidence of conspiracy to subvert democracy",
">\n\nThat's not what's being discussed. We're talking about Meadows burning documents.",
">\n\nLock him up.",
">\n\nMake sure he gets a prison cell with a low flow toilet. Those things piss him off",
">\n\nGuys can't even courtesy flush because by the time they finally get that beefroll down the hatch, it's too late--the stink is everywhere by then. Not me, of course. But Bubba, next cell over--hooWEE! Let me tell you folks, it's true. This is America, can you believe it? Maybe it's fine in Gynna. Their poops are smaller, I guess. Short little people over there. Little people, little poops. And I don't like how you have to pull down the jumpsuit to drop a deuce, either. Everyone says I wear it well, though--the warden, the CO's. No one has ever looked more presidential in a jumpsuit, they say.",
">\n\nThis women deserves the credit mike pence is getting",
">\n\nIt’s really annoying that Mike Pence keeps getting any credit for anything. He showed he had a spine on the one day it matters, and then keeps trying to play the “we just need to put this behind us and focus on the “real”* issues”. Again, Mike Pence did the only thing that mattered of him on Jan 6, good. I’m glad he was there and did that.\nIt doesnt make him a good person. It doesnt make him smart. And without verbally attacking the person who sent a far right mob to kill him, he is fine with his life being put in danger for “owning the libs”. What a spineless piece of shit.\n*real meaning anything I can make up that forces democrats to react to, and usually it has nothing to do with true policy.",
">\n\nEh, you guys are just struggling to give credit where credit is due because of the R next to his name and disagreements on previous policies. Call a spade a spade, the man made a hard decision for the moment and he should be honored for it just like those that voted not to impeach Andrew Johnson in the 1860s and others that came before us who stood to keep our country hole.",
">\n\nIt’s honestly a question of if you think certifying votes should qualify as job done. I’d argue that when you see, firsthand, a fundamental threat to our democracy as the second in command you are duty bound to do more than turn the page.",
">\n\nI agree completely. I’d just like to push back that it’s a lot easier to say this on a Reddit thread than with 60,000 people screaming hang Mike Pence on your front door from constructed gallows. Anyone who says he doesn’t deserve credit is doing so because they are unable to come down from their tower.",
">\n\nThe problem with giving Pence too much credit is that it glosses over the fact that, prior to January 6th, Pence was trying really hard to do what Trump wanted. He was looking for any legal justification to not certify the election and was even entertaining the idea without one.\nIt's like giving someone a pat on the back for finally doing the right thing after they knowingly did the wrong thing.\nIn addition, that moment of courage by Pence gets completely washed away by his intransigence to comply with the investigation. All he cares about is his political ambitions.",
">\n\nMaybe so. But history will be written with Pence as a hero and that’s okay with me.",
">\n\nAnd cassidy Hutchinson should be. My original point. Yea, his co pilot through this entire shit show is a hero for doing his job. I don't feel bad for the situation they got themselves into. There were more than enough warning signs leading allll the way up to this day.",
">\n\nWelp... That's obstruction / destruction of evidence.",
">\n\nFor all the security cameras in public places you'd think we'd also have them for public offices.",
">\n\nThe difference is the people making those decisions are in the offices.",
">\n\nIt's probably more effective than flushing them.",
">\n\nOr eating them",
">\n\nOr stealing them.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 65%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nFormer Trump White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson indicated Mark Meadows, the White House chief of staff, burned documents in his fireplace roughly a dozen times in the final weeks of the administration, according to newly released transcripts of her House Jan. 6 committee depositions.\n\"The Presidential Records Act only asks that you keep the original copy of a document. So, yes,\" Hutchinson said when asked if she saw Meadows use the fireplace to burn documents.\n\"I know maybe three or four times - between two and four times, he had Mr. Perry in his office right before,\" Hutchinson told the committee, although she cautioned that she did not know what documents were burned.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Hutchinson^#1 Meadows^#2 burn^#3 document^#4 fireplace^#5",
">\n\nMerrick, you're up dude, jesus.",
">\n\nabdicated to jack smith to maintain independence so that the criminal process itself cannot be attacked to avoid justice.",
">\n\nthat was locker room destruction of government property. also trump has complete immunity. ALSO (somehow) he did nothing wrong.",
">\n\nI would assume that any document given to Mark Meadows was printed off and must be on a hard drive somewhere right? It's not the olden days when records were stored only on paper. So why was MM burning them?",
">\n\nHandwritten memos, received old school faxes, typewritten single copies. \nAlthough I did buy a used fax machine years ago that came from a gov’t office and stored on the carbon roll were months of a provincial cabinet minister’s outgoing communications.",
">\n\nShe’s very brave and I hope she can continue speaking truth to this national embarrassment",
">\n\nThis seems rather early 20th century don't you think? Republicans......ever behind the times. LOL.",
">\n\nTruly the Internet Explorer of political parties.",
">\n\nThe political party of AOL dialup."
] |
>
Welcome to Costco, I love you
|
[
"It's only clear if one can prove they were originals, not copies. I'm all for holding them accountable but you toss the baby out with the bath water. Be rational and logical.",
">\n\nI’m sure they brunt copies because that’s what you do with incriminating evidence copy it and burn the copies. Jesus man.",
">\n\nI'm just saying... rationally speaking, if you can't prove they were original documents, you cannot jump straight to \"yep that's it, hang em\". Are the odds good that they were originals? I'd say yes, but you have to prove it.",
">\n\nHe was a participant in a criminal conspiracy and he burned documents I would vote to convict.",
">\n\nWithout evidence? What you mentioned is circumstantial. If you're willing to convict someone of a specific crime without specific evidence to back it up, you're no better than they are. You would be acting on emotion and bias rather than evidence and proof. This is how lots of people end up locked up who are actually innocent of the crime in question because they are judged based on other behavior. That is not justice served.",
">\n\nIf you provably conspired to murder someone provably and we find human blood stains on your rug its ok to consider it further proof of the same crime we already proved. \nThere is ample evidence of the criminal conspiracy. There is no motivation in any possible universe where someone guilty of criminal conspiracy burns government documents and we believe that the governments were copies.\nPlease note the word reasonable in reasonable doubt.",
">\n\n\nprovably\n\nTherein lies the problem",
">\n\nWe have ample evidence of conspiracy to subvert democracy",
">\n\nThat's not what's being discussed. We're talking about Meadows burning documents.",
">\n\nLock him up.",
">\n\nMake sure he gets a prison cell with a low flow toilet. Those things piss him off",
">\n\nGuys can't even courtesy flush because by the time they finally get that beefroll down the hatch, it's too late--the stink is everywhere by then. Not me, of course. But Bubba, next cell over--hooWEE! Let me tell you folks, it's true. This is America, can you believe it? Maybe it's fine in Gynna. Their poops are smaller, I guess. Short little people over there. Little people, little poops. And I don't like how you have to pull down the jumpsuit to drop a deuce, either. Everyone says I wear it well, though--the warden, the CO's. No one has ever looked more presidential in a jumpsuit, they say.",
">\n\nThis women deserves the credit mike pence is getting",
">\n\nIt’s really annoying that Mike Pence keeps getting any credit for anything. He showed he had a spine on the one day it matters, and then keeps trying to play the “we just need to put this behind us and focus on the “real”* issues”. Again, Mike Pence did the only thing that mattered of him on Jan 6, good. I’m glad he was there and did that.\nIt doesnt make him a good person. It doesnt make him smart. And without verbally attacking the person who sent a far right mob to kill him, he is fine with his life being put in danger for “owning the libs”. What a spineless piece of shit.\n*real meaning anything I can make up that forces democrats to react to, and usually it has nothing to do with true policy.",
">\n\nEh, you guys are just struggling to give credit where credit is due because of the R next to his name and disagreements on previous policies. Call a spade a spade, the man made a hard decision for the moment and he should be honored for it just like those that voted not to impeach Andrew Johnson in the 1860s and others that came before us who stood to keep our country hole.",
">\n\nIt’s honestly a question of if you think certifying votes should qualify as job done. I’d argue that when you see, firsthand, a fundamental threat to our democracy as the second in command you are duty bound to do more than turn the page.",
">\n\nI agree completely. I’d just like to push back that it’s a lot easier to say this on a Reddit thread than with 60,000 people screaming hang Mike Pence on your front door from constructed gallows. Anyone who says he doesn’t deserve credit is doing so because they are unable to come down from their tower.",
">\n\nThe problem with giving Pence too much credit is that it glosses over the fact that, prior to January 6th, Pence was trying really hard to do what Trump wanted. He was looking for any legal justification to not certify the election and was even entertaining the idea without one.\nIt's like giving someone a pat on the back for finally doing the right thing after they knowingly did the wrong thing.\nIn addition, that moment of courage by Pence gets completely washed away by his intransigence to comply with the investigation. All he cares about is his political ambitions.",
">\n\nMaybe so. But history will be written with Pence as a hero and that’s okay with me.",
">\n\nAnd cassidy Hutchinson should be. My original point. Yea, his co pilot through this entire shit show is a hero for doing his job. I don't feel bad for the situation they got themselves into. There were more than enough warning signs leading allll the way up to this day.",
">\n\nWelp... That's obstruction / destruction of evidence.",
">\n\nFor all the security cameras in public places you'd think we'd also have them for public offices.",
">\n\nThe difference is the people making those decisions are in the offices.",
">\n\nIt's probably more effective than flushing them.",
">\n\nOr eating them",
">\n\nOr stealing them.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 65%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nFormer Trump White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson indicated Mark Meadows, the White House chief of staff, burned documents in his fireplace roughly a dozen times in the final weeks of the administration, according to newly released transcripts of her House Jan. 6 committee depositions.\n\"The Presidential Records Act only asks that you keep the original copy of a document. So, yes,\" Hutchinson said when asked if she saw Meadows use the fireplace to burn documents.\n\"I know maybe three or four times - between two and four times, he had Mr. Perry in his office right before,\" Hutchinson told the committee, although she cautioned that she did not know what documents were burned.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Hutchinson^#1 Meadows^#2 burn^#3 document^#4 fireplace^#5",
">\n\nMerrick, you're up dude, jesus.",
">\n\nabdicated to jack smith to maintain independence so that the criminal process itself cannot be attacked to avoid justice.",
">\n\nthat was locker room destruction of government property. also trump has complete immunity. ALSO (somehow) he did nothing wrong.",
">\n\nI would assume that any document given to Mark Meadows was printed off and must be on a hard drive somewhere right? It's not the olden days when records were stored only on paper. So why was MM burning them?",
">\n\nHandwritten memos, received old school faxes, typewritten single copies. \nAlthough I did buy a used fax machine years ago that came from a gov’t office and stored on the carbon roll were months of a provincial cabinet minister’s outgoing communications.",
">\n\nShe’s very brave and I hope she can continue speaking truth to this national embarrassment",
">\n\nThis seems rather early 20th century don't you think? Republicans......ever behind the times. LOL.",
">\n\nTruly the Internet Explorer of political parties.",
">\n\nThe political party of AOL dialup.",
">\n\nBrought to you by Carl’s Jr."
] |
>
Arrest the shitstain and his boss already DOJ.
|
[
"It's only clear if one can prove they were originals, not copies. I'm all for holding them accountable but you toss the baby out with the bath water. Be rational and logical.",
">\n\nI’m sure they brunt copies because that’s what you do with incriminating evidence copy it and burn the copies. Jesus man.",
">\n\nI'm just saying... rationally speaking, if you can't prove they were original documents, you cannot jump straight to \"yep that's it, hang em\". Are the odds good that they were originals? I'd say yes, but you have to prove it.",
">\n\nHe was a participant in a criminal conspiracy and he burned documents I would vote to convict.",
">\n\nWithout evidence? What you mentioned is circumstantial. If you're willing to convict someone of a specific crime without specific evidence to back it up, you're no better than they are. You would be acting on emotion and bias rather than evidence and proof. This is how lots of people end up locked up who are actually innocent of the crime in question because they are judged based on other behavior. That is not justice served.",
">\n\nIf you provably conspired to murder someone provably and we find human blood stains on your rug its ok to consider it further proof of the same crime we already proved. \nThere is ample evidence of the criminal conspiracy. There is no motivation in any possible universe where someone guilty of criminal conspiracy burns government documents and we believe that the governments were copies.\nPlease note the word reasonable in reasonable doubt.",
">\n\n\nprovably\n\nTherein lies the problem",
">\n\nWe have ample evidence of conspiracy to subvert democracy",
">\n\nThat's not what's being discussed. We're talking about Meadows burning documents.",
">\n\nLock him up.",
">\n\nMake sure he gets a prison cell with a low flow toilet. Those things piss him off",
">\n\nGuys can't even courtesy flush because by the time they finally get that beefroll down the hatch, it's too late--the stink is everywhere by then. Not me, of course. But Bubba, next cell over--hooWEE! Let me tell you folks, it's true. This is America, can you believe it? Maybe it's fine in Gynna. Their poops are smaller, I guess. Short little people over there. Little people, little poops. And I don't like how you have to pull down the jumpsuit to drop a deuce, either. Everyone says I wear it well, though--the warden, the CO's. No one has ever looked more presidential in a jumpsuit, they say.",
">\n\nThis women deserves the credit mike pence is getting",
">\n\nIt’s really annoying that Mike Pence keeps getting any credit for anything. He showed he had a spine on the one day it matters, and then keeps trying to play the “we just need to put this behind us and focus on the “real”* issues”. Again, Mike Pence did the only thing that mattered of him on Jan 6, good. I’m glad he was there and did that.\nIt doesnt make him a good person. It doesnt make him smart. And without verbally attacking the person who sent a far right mob to kill him, he is fine with his life being put in danger for “owning the libs”. What a spineless piece of shit.\n*real meaning anything I can make up that forces democrats to react to, and usually it has nothing to do with true policy.",
">\n\nEh, you guys are just struggling to give credit where credit is due because of the R next to his name and disagreements on previous policies. Call a spade a spade, the man made a hard decision for the moment and he should be honored for it just like those that voted not to impeach Andrew Johnson in the 1860s and others that came before us who stood to keep our country hole.",
">\n\nIt’s honestly a question of if you think certifying votes should qualify as job done. I’d argue that when you see, firsthand, a fundamental threat to our democracy as the second in command you are duty bound to do more than turn the page.",
">\n\nI agree completely. I’d just like to push back that it’s a lot easier to say this on a Reddit thread than with 60,000 people screaming hang Mike Pence on your front door from constructed gallows. Anyone who says he doesn’t deserve credit is doing so because they are unable to come down from their tower.",
">\n\nThe problem with giving Pence too much credit is that it glosses over the fact that, prior to January 6th, Pence was trying really hard to do what Trump wanted. He was looking for any legal justification to not certify the election and was even entertaining the idea without one.\nIt's like giving someone a pat on the back for finally doing the right thing after they knowingly did the wrong thing.\nIn addition, that moment of courage by Pence gets completely washed away by his intransigence to comply with the investigation. All he cares about is his political ambitions.",
">\n\nMaybe so. But history will be written with Pence as a hero and that’s okay with me.",
">\n\nAnd cassidy Hutchinson should be. My original point. Yea, his co pilot through this entire shit show is a hero for doing his job. I don't feel bad for the situation they got themselves into. There were more than enough warning signs leading allll the way up to this day.",
">\n\nWelp... That's obstruction / destruction of evidence.",
">\n\nFor all the security cameras in public places you'd think we'd also have them for public offices.",
">\n\nThe difference is the people making those decisions are in the offices.",
">\n\nIt's probably more effective than flushing them.",
">\n\nOr eating them",
">\n\nOr stealing them.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 65%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nFormer Trump White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson indicated Mark Meadows, the White House chief of staff, burned documents in his fireplace roughly a dozen times in the final weeks of the administration, according to newly released transcripts of her House Jan. 6 committee depositions.\n\"The Presidential Records Act only asks that you keep the original copy of a document. So, yes,\" Hutchinson said when asked if she saw Meadows use the fireplace to burn documents.\n\"I know maybe three or four times - between two and four times, he had Mr. Perry in his office right before,\" Hutchinson told the committee, although she cautioned that she did not know what documents were burned.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Hutchinson^#1 Meadows^#2 burn^#3 document^#4 fireplace^#5",
">\n\nMerrick, you're up dude, jesus.",
">\n\nabdicated to jack smith to maintain independence so that the criminal process itself cannot be attacked to avoid justice.",
">\n\nthat was locker room destruction of government property. also trump has complete immunity. ALSO (somehow) he did nothing wrong.",
">\n\nI would assume that any document given to Mark Meadows was printed off and must be on a hard drive somewhere right? It's not the olden days when records were stored only on paper. So why was MM burning them?",
">\n\nHandwritten memos, received old school faxes, typewritten single copies. \nAlthough I did buy a used fax machine years ago that came from a gov’t office and stored on the carbon roll were months of a provincial cabinet minister’s outgoing communications.",
">\n\nShe’s very brave and I hope she can continue speaking truth to this national embarrassment",
">\n\nThis seems rather early 20th century don't you think? Republicans......ever behind the times. LOL.",
">\n\nTruly the Internet Explorer of political parties.",
">\n\nThe political party of AOL dialup.",
">\n\nBrought to you by Carl’s Jr.",
">\n\nWelcome to Costco, I love you"
] |
>
So no one is going to prison for this presidential crime spree? Really??
|
[
"It's only clear if one can prove they were originals, not copies. I'm all for holding them accountable but you toss the baby out with the bath water. Be rational and logical.",
">\n\nI’m sure they brunt copies because that’s what you do with incriminating evidence copy it and burn the copies. Jesus man.",
">\n\nI'm just saying... rationally speaking, if you can't prove they were original documents, you cannot jump straight to \"yep that's it, hang em\". Are the odds good that they were originals? I'd say yes, but you have to prove it.",
">\n\nHe was a participant in a criminal conspiracy and he burned documents I would vote to convict.",
">\n\nWithout evidence? What you mentioned is circumstantial. If you're willing to convict someone of a specific crime without specific evidence to back it up, you're no better than they are. You would be acting on emotion and bias rather than evidence and proof. This is how lots of people end up locked up who are actually innocent of the crime in question because they are judged based on other behavior. That is not justice served.",
">\n\nIf you provably conspired to murder someone provably and we find human blood stains on your rug its ok to consider it further proof of the same crime we already proved. \nThere is ample evidence of the criminal conspiracy. There is no motivation in any possible universe where someone guilty of criminal conspiracy burns government documents and we believe that the governments were copies.\nPlease note the word reasonable in reasonable doubt.",
">\n\n\nprovably\n\nTherein lies the problem",
">\n\nWe have ample evidence of conspiracy to subvert democracy",
">\n\nThat's not what's being discussed. We're talking about Meadows burning documents.",
">\n\nLock him up.",
">\n\nMake sure he gets a prison cell with a low flow toilet. Those things piss him off",
">\n\nGuys can't even courtesy flush because by the time they finally get that beefroll down the hatch, it's too late--the stink is everywhere by then. Not me, of course. But Bubba, next cell over--hooWEE! Let me tell you folks, it's true. This is America, can you believe it? Maybe it's fine in Gynna. Their poops are smaller, I guess. Short little people over there. Little people, little poops. And I don't like how you have to pull down the jumpsuit to drop a deuce, either. Everyone says I wear it well, though--the warden, the CO's. No one has ever looked more presidential in a jumpsuit, they say.",
">\n\nThis women deserves the credit mike pence is getting",
">\n\nIt’s really annoying that Mike Pence keeps getting any credit for anything. He showed he had a spine on the one day it matters, and then keeps trying to play the “we just need to put this behind us and focus on the “real”* issues”. Again, Mike Pence did the only thing that mattered of him on Jan 6, good. I’m glad he was there and did that.\nIt doesnt make him a good person. It doesnt make him smart. And without verbally attacking the person who sent a far right mob to kill him, he is fine with his life being put in danger for “owning the libs”. What a spineless piece of shit.\n*real meaning anything I can make up that forces democrats to react to, and usually it has nothing to do with true policy.",
">\n\nEh, you guys are just struggling to give credit where credit is due because of the R next to his name and disagreements on previous policies. Call a spade a spade, the man made a hard decision for the moment and he should be honored for it just like those that voted not to impeach Andrew Johnson in the 1860s and others that came before us who stood to keep our country hole.",
">\n\nIt’s honestly a question of if you think certifying votes should qualify as job done. I’d argue that when you see, firsthand, a fundamental threat to our democracy as the second in command you are duty bound to do more than turn the page.",
">\n\nI agree completely. I’d just like to push back that it’s a lot easier to say this on a Reddit thread than with 60,000 people screaming hang Mike Pence on your front door from constructed gallows. Anyone who says he doesn’t deserve credit is doing so because they are unable to come down from their tower.",
">\n\nThe problem with giving Pence too much credit is that it glosses over the fact that, prior to January 6th, Pence was trying really hard to do what Trump wanted. He was looking for any legal justification to not certify the election and was even entertaining the idea without one.\nIt's like giving someone a pat on the back for finally doing the right thing after they knowingly did the wrong thing.\nIn addition, that moment of courage by Pence gets completely washed away by his intransigence to comply with the investigation. All he cares about is his political ambitions.",
">\n\nMaybe so. But history will be written with Pence as a hero and that’s okay with me.",
">\n\nAnd cassidy Hutchinson should be. My original point. Yea, his co pilot through this entire shit show is a hero for doing his job. I don't feel bad for the situation they got themselves into. There were more than enough warning signs leading allll the way up to this day.",
">\n\nWelp... That's obstruction / destruction of evidence.",
">\n\nFor all the security cameras in public places you'd think we'd also have them for public offices.",
">\n\nThe difference is the people making those decisions are in the offices.",
">\n\nIt's probably more effective than flushing them.",
">\n\nOr eating them",
">\n\nOr stealing them.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 65%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nFormer Trump White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson indicated Mark Meadows, the White House chief of staff, burned documents in his fireplace roughly a dozen times in the final weeks of the administration, according to newly released transcripts of her House Jan. 6 committee depositions.\n\"The Presidential Records Act only asks that you keep the original copy of a document. So, yes,\" Hutchinson said when asked if she saw Meadows use the fireplace to burn documents.\n\"I know maybe three or four times - between two and four times, he had Mr. Perry in his office right before,\" Hutchinson told the committee, although she cautioned that she did not know what documents were burned.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Hutchinson^#1 Meadows^#2 burn^#3 document^#4 fireplace^#5",
">\n\nMerrick, you're up dude, jesus.",
">\n\nabdicated to jack smith to maintain independence so that the criminal process itself cannot be attacked to avoid justice.",
">\n\nthat was locker room destruction of government property. also trump has complete immunity. ALSO (somehow) he did nothing wrong.",
">\n\nI would assume that any document given to Mark Meadows was printed off and must be on a hard drive somewhere right? It's not the olden days when records were stored only on paper. So why was MM burning them?",
">\n\nHandwritten memos, received old school faxes, typewritten single copies. \nAlthough I did buy a used fax machine years ago that came from a gov’t office and stored on the carbon roll were months of a provincial cabinet minister’s outgoing communications.",
">\n\nShe’s very brave and I hope she can continue speaking truth to this national embarrassment",
">\n\nThis seems rather early 20th century don't you think? Republicans......ever behind the times. LOL.",
">\n\nTruly the Internet Explorer of political parties.",
">\n\nThe political party of AOL dialup.",
">\n\nBrought to you by Carl’s Jr.",
">\n\nWelcome to Costco, I love you",
">\n\nArrest the shitstain and his boss already DOJ."
] |
>
Fun little felony.
|
[
"It's only clear if one can prove they were originals, not copies. I'm all for holding them accountable but you toss the baby out with the bath water. Be rational and logical.",
">\n\nI’m sure they brunt copies because that’s what you do with incriminating evidence copy it and burn the copies. Jesus man.",
">\n\nI'm just saying... rationally speaking, if you can't prove they were original documents, you cannot jump straight to \"yep that's it, hang em\". Are the odds good that they were originals? I'd say yes, but you have to prove it.",
">\n\nHe was a participant in a criminal conspiracy and he burned documents I would vote to convict.",
">\n\nWithout evidence? What you mentioned is circumstantial. If you're willing to convict someone of a specific crime without specific evidence to back it up, you're no better than they are. You would be acting on emotion and bias rather than evidence and proof. This is how lots of people end up locked up who are actually innocent of the crime in question because they are judged based on other behavior. That is not justice served.",
">\n\nIf you provably conspired to murder someone provably and we find human blood stains on your rug its ok to consider it further proof of the same crime we already proved. \nThere is ample evidence of the criminal conspiracy. There is no motivation in any possible universe where someone guilty of criminal conspiracy burns government documents and we believe that the governments were copies.\nPlease note the word reasonable in reasonable doubt.",
">\n\n\nprovably\n\nTherein lies the problem",
">\n\nWe have ample evidence of conspiracy to subvert democracy",
">\n\nThat's not what's being discussed. We're talking about Meadows burning documents.",
">\n\nLock him up.",
">\n\nMake sure he gets a prison cell with a low flow toilet. Those things piss him off",
">\n\nGuys can't even courtesy flush because by the time they finally get that beefroll down the hatch, it's too late--the stink is everywhere by then. Not me, of course. But Bubba, next cell over--hooWEE! Let me tell you folks, it's true. This is America, can you believe it? Maybe it's fine in Gynna. Their poops are smaller, I guess. Short little people over there. Little people, little poops. And I don't like how you have to pull down the jumpsuit to drop a deuce, either. Everyone says I wear it well, though--the warden, the CO's. No one has ever looked more presidential in a jumpsuit, they say.",
">\n\nThis women deserves the credit mike pence is getting",
">\n\nIt’s really annoying that Mike Pence keeps getting any credit for anything. He showed he had a spine on the one day it matters, and then keeps trying to play the “we just need to put this behind us and focus on the “real”* issues”. Again, Mike Pence did the only thing that mattered of him on Jan 6, good. I’m glad he was there and did that.\nIt doesnt make him a good person. It doesnt make him smart. And without verbally attacking the person who sent a far right mob to kill him, he is fine with his life being put in danger for “owning the libs”. What a spineless piece of shit.\n*real meaning anything I can make up that forces democrats to react to, and usually it has nothing to do with true policy.",
">\n\nEh, you guys are just struggling to give credit where credit is due because of the R next to his name and disagreements on previous policies. Call a spade a spade, the man made a hard decision for the moment and he should be honored for it just like those that voted not to impeach Andrew Johnson in the 1860s and others that came before us who stood to keep our country hole.",
">\n\nIt’s honestly a question of if you think certifying votes should qualify as job done. I’d argue that when you see, firsthand, a fundamental threat to our democracy as the second in command you are duty bound to do more than turn the page.",
">\n\nI agree completely. I’d just like to push back that it’s a lot easier to say this on a Reddit thread than with 60,000 people screaming hang Mike Pence on your front door from constructed gallows. Anyone who says he doesn’t deserve credit is doing so because they are unable to come down from their tower.",
">\n\nThe problem with giving Pence too much credit is that it glosses over the fact that, prior to January 6th, Pence was trying really hard to do what Trump wanted. He was looking for any legal justification to not certify the election and was even entertaining the idea without one.\nIt's like giving someone a pat on the back for finally doing the right thing after they knowingly did the wrong thing.\nIn addition, that moment of courage by Pence gets completely washed away by his intransigence to comply with the investigation. All he cares about is his political ambitions.",
">\n\nMaybe so. But history will be written with Pence as a hero and that’s okay with me.",
">\n\nAnd cassidy Hutchinson should be. My original point. Yea, his co pilot through this entire shit show is a hero for doing his job. I don't feel bad for the situation they got themselves into. There were more than enough warning signs leading allll the way up to this day.",
">\n\nWelp... That's obstruction / destruction of evidence.",
">\n\nFor all the security cameras in public places you'd think we'd also have them for public offices.",
">\n\nThe difference is the people making those decisions are in the offices.",
">\n\nIt's probably more effective than flushing them.",
">\n\nOr eating them",
">\n\nOr stealing them.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 65%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nFormer Trump White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson indicated Mark Meadows, the White House chief of staff, burned documents in his fireplace roughly a dozen times in the final weeks of the administration, according to newly released transcripts of her House Jan. 6 committee depositions.\n\"The Presidential Records Act only asks that you keep the original copy of a document. So, yes,\" Hutchinson said when asked if she saw Meadows use the fireplace to burn documents.\n\"I know maybe three or four times - between two and four times, he had Mr. Perry in his office right before,\" Hutchinson told the committee, although she cautioned that she did not know what documents were burned.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Hutchinson^#1 Meadows^#2 burn^#3 document^#4 fireplace^#5",
">\n\nMerrick, you're up dude, jesus.",
">\n\nabdicated to jack smith to maintain independence so that the criminal process itself cannot be attacked to avoid justice.",
">\n\nthat was locker room destruction of government property. also trump has complete immunity. ALSO (somehow) he did nothing wrong.",
">\n\nI would assume that any document given to Mark Meadows was printed off and must be on a hard drive somewhere right? It's not the olden days when records were stored only on paper. So why was MM burning them?",
">\n\nHandwritten memos, received old school faxes, typewritten single copies. \nAlthough I did buy a used fax machine years ago that came from a gov’t office and stored on the carbon roll were months of a provincial cabinet minister’s outgoing communications.",
">\n\nShe’s very brave and I hope she can continue speaking truth to this national embarrassment",
">\n\nThis seems rather early 20th century don't you think? Republicans......ever behind the times. LOL.",
">\n\nTruly the Internet Explorer of political parties.",
">\n\nThe political party of AOL dialup.",
">\n\nBrought to you by Carl’s Jr.",
">\n\nWelcome to Costco, I love you",
">\n\nArrest the shitstain and his boss already DOJ.",
">\n\nSo no one is going to prison for this presidential crime spree? Really??"
] |
>
Pence only did the right thing because after talking to his lawyers, he realized he would be on legal trouble. He only did it for his own a**
|
[
"It's only clear if one can prove they were originals, not copies. I'm all for holding them accountable but you toss the baby out with the bath water. Be rational and logical.",
">\n\nI’m sure they brunt copies because that’s what you do with incriminating evidence copy it and burn the copies. Jesus man.",
">\n\nI'm just saying... rationally speaking, if you can't prove they were original documents, you cannot jump straight to \"yep that's it, hang em\". Are the odds good that they were originals? I'd say yes, but you have to prove it.",
">\n\nHe was a participant in a criminal conspiracy and he burned documents I would vote to convict.",
">\n\nWithout evidence? What you mentioned is circumstantial. If you're willing to convict someone of a specific crime without specific evidence to back it up, you're no better than they are. You would be acting on emotion and bias rather than evidence and proof. This is how lots of people end up locked up who are actually innocent of the crime in question because they are judged based on other behavior. That is not justice served.",
">\n\nIf you provably conspired to murder someone provably and we find human blood stains on your rug its ok to consider it further proof of the same crime we already proved. \nThere is ample evidence of the criminal conspiracy. There is no motivation in any possible universe where someone guilty of criminal conspiracy burns government documents and we believe that the governments were copies.\nPlease note the word reasonable in reasonable doubt.",
">\n\n\nprovably\n\nTherein lies the problem",
">\n\nWe have ample evidence of conspiracy to subvert democracy",
">\n\nThat's not what's being discussed. We're talking about Meadows burning documents.",
">\n\nLock him up.",
">\n\nMake sure he gets a prison cell with a low flow toilet. Those things piss him off",
">\n\nGuys can't even courtesy flush because by the time they finally get that beefroll down the hatch, it's too late--the stink is everywhere by then. Not me, of course. But Bubba, next cell over--hooWEE! Let me tell you folks, it's true. This is America, can you believe it? Maybe it's fine in Gynna. Their poops are smaller, I guess. Short little people over there. Little people, little poops. And I don't like how you have to pull down the jumpsuit to drop a deuce, either. Everyone says I wear it well, though--the warden, the CO's. No one has ever looked more presidential in a jumpsuit, they say.",
">\n\nThis women deserves the credit mike pence is getting",
">\n\nIt’s really annoying that Mike Pence keeps getting any credit for anything. He showed he had a spine on the one day it matters, and then keeps trying to play the “we just need to put this behind us and focus on the “real”* issues”. Again, Mike Pence did the only thing that mattered of him on Jan 6, good. I’m glad he was there and did that.\nIt doesnt make him a good person. It doesnt make him smart. And without verbally attacking the person who sent a far right mob to kill him, he is fine with his life being put in danger for “owning the libs”. What a spineless piece of shit.\n*real meaning anything I can make up that forces democrats to react to, and usually it has nothing to do with true policy.",
">\n\nEh, you guys are just struggling to give credit where credit is due because of the R next to his name and disagreements on previous policies. Call a spade a spade, the man made a hard decision for the moment and he should be honored for it just like those that voted not to impeach Andrew Johnson in the 1860s and others that came before us who stood to keep our country hole.",
">\n\nIt’s honestly a question of if you think certifying votes should qualify as job done. I’d argue that when you see, firsthand, a fundamental threat to our democracy as the second in command you are duty bound to do more than turn the page.",
">\n\nI agree completely. I’d just like to push back that it’s a lot easier to say this on a Reddit thread than with 60,000 people screaming hang Mike Pence on your front door from constructed gallows. Anyone who says he doesn’t deserve credit is doing so because they are unable to come down from their tower.",
">\n\nThe problem with giving Pence too much credit is that it glosses over the fact that, prior to January 6th, Pence was trying really hard to do what Trump wanted. He was looking for any legal justification to not certify the election and was even entertaining the idea without one.\nIt's like giving someone a pat on the back for finally doing the right thing after they knowingly did the wrong thing.\nIn addition, that moment of courage by Pence gets completely washed away by his intransigence to comply with the investigation. All he cares about is his political ambitions.",
">\n\nMaybe so. But history will be written with Pence as a hero and that’s okay with me.",
">\n\nAnd cassidy Hutchinson should be. My original point. Yea, his co pilot through this entire shit show is a hero for doing his job. I don't feel bad for the situation they got themselves into. There were more than enough warning signs leading allll the way up to this day.",
">\n\nWelp... That's obstruction / destruction of evidence.",
">\n\nFor all the security cameras in public places you'd think we'd also have them for public offices.",
">\n\nThe difference is the people making those decisions are in the offices.",
">\n\nIt's probably more effective than flushing them.",
">\n\nOr eating them",
">\n\nOr stealing them.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 65%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nFormer Trump White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson indicated Mark Meadows, the White House chief of staff, burned documents in his fireplace roughly a dozen times in the final weeks of the administration, according to newly released transcripts of her House Jan. 6 committee depositions.\n\"The Presidential Records Act only asks that you keep the original copy of a document. So, yes,\" Hutchinson said when asked if she saw Meadows use the fireplace to burn documents.\n\"I know maybe three or four times - between two and four times, he had Mr. Perry in his office right before,\" Hutchinson told the committee, although she cautioned that she did not know what documents were burned.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Hutchinson^#1 Meadows^#2 burn^#3 document^#4 fireplace^#5",
">\n\nMerrick, you're up dude, jesus.",
">\n\nabdicated to jack smith to maintain independence so that the criminal process itself cannot be attacked to avoid justice.",
">\n\nthat was locker room destruction of government property. also trump has complete immunity. ALSO (somehow) he did nothing wrong.",
">\n\nI would assume that any document given to Mark Meadows was printed off and must be on a hard drive somewhere right? It's not the olden days when records were stored only on paper. So why was MM burning them?",
">\n\nHandwritten memos, received old school faxes, typewritten single copies. \nAlthough I did buy a used fax machine years ago that came from a gov’t office and stored on the carbon roll were months of a provincial cabinet minister’s outgoing communications.",
">\n\nShe’s very brave and I hope she can continue speaking truth to this national embarrassment",
">\n\nThis seems rather early 20th century don't you think? Republicans......ever behind the times. LOL.",
">\n\nTruly the Internet Explorer of political parties.",
">\n\nThe political party of AOL dialup.",
">\n\nBrought to you by Carl’s Jr.",
">\n\nWelcome to Costco, I love you",
">\n\nArrest the shitstain and his boss already DOJ.",
">\n\nSo no one is going to prison for this presidential crime spree? Really??",
">\n\nFun little felony."
] |
>
AND after talking with Dan Quayle, checking if there was anything Pence could legally do to stop the certification.
|
[
"It's only clear if one can prove they were originals, not copies. I'm all for holding them accountable but you toss the baby out with the bath water. Be rational and logical.",
">\n\nI’m sure they brunt copies because that’s what you do with incriminating evidence copy it and burn the copies. Jesus man.",
">\n\nI'm just saying... rationally speaking, if you can't prove they were original documents, you cannot jump straight to \"yep that's it, hang em\". Are the odds good that they were originals? I'd say yes, but you have to prove it.",
">\n\nHe was a participant in a criminal conspiracy and he burned documents I would vote to convict.",
">\n\nWithout evidence? What you mentioned is circumstantial. If you're willing to convict someone of a specific crime without specific evidence to back it up, you're no better than they are. You would be acting on emotion and bias rather than evidence and proof. This is how lots of people end up locked up who are actually innocent of the crime in question because they are judged based on other behavior. That is not justice served.",
">\n\nIf you provably conspired to murder someone provably and we find human blood stains on your rug its ok to consider it further proof of the same crime we already proved. \nThere is ample evidence of the criminal conspiracy. There is no motivation in any possible universe where someone guilty of criminal conspiracy burns government documents and we believe that the governments were copies.\nPlease note the word reasonable in reasonable doubt.",
">\n\n\nprovably\n\nTherein lies the problem",
">\n\nWe have ample evidence of conspiracy to subvert democracy",
">\n\nThat's not what's being discussed. We're talking about Meadows burning documents.",
">\n\nLock him up.",
">\n\nMake sure he gets a prison cell with a low flow toilet. Those things piss him off",
">\n\nGuys can't even courtesy flush because by the time they finally get that beefroll down the hatch, it's too late--the stink is everywhere by then. Not me, of course. But Bubba, next cell over--hooWEE! Let me tell you folks, it's true. This is America, can you believe it? Maybe it's fine in Gynna. Their poops are smaller, I guess. Short little people over there. Little people, little poops. And I don't like how you have to pull down the jumpsuit to drop a deuce, either. Everyone says I wear it well, though--the warden, the CO's. No one has ever looked more presidential in a jumpsuit, they say.",
">\n\nThis women deserves the credit mike pence is getting",
">\n\nIt’s really annoying that Mike Pence keeps getting any credit for anything. He showed he had a spine on the one day it matters, and then keeps trying to play the “we just need to put this behind us and focus on the “real”* issues”. Again, Mike Pence did the only thing that mattered of him on Jan 6, good. I’m glad he was there and did that.\nIt doesnt make him a good person. It doesnt make him smart. And without verbally attacking the person who sent a far right mob to kill him, he is fine with his life being put in danger for “owning the libs”. What a spineless piece of shit.\n*real meaning anything I can make up that forces democrats to react to, and usually it has nothing to do with true policy.",
">\n\nEh, you guys are just struggling to give credit where credit is due because of the R next to his name and disagreements on previous policies. Call a spade a spade, the man made a hard decision for the moment and he should be honored for it just like those that voted not to impeach Andrew Johnson in the 1860s and others that came before us who stood to keep our country hole.",
">\n\nIt’s honestly a question of if you think certifying votes should qualify as job done. I’d argue that when you see, firsthand, a fundamental threat to our democracy as the second in command you are duty bound to do more than turn the page.",
">\n\nI agree completely. I’d just like to push back that it’s a lot easier to say this on a Reddit thread than with 60,000 people screaming hang Mike Pence on your front door from constructed gallows. Anyone who says he doesn’t deserve credit is doing so because they are unable to come down from their tower.",
">\n\nThe problem with giving Pence too much credit is that it glosses over the fact that, prior to January 6th, Pence was trying really hard to do what Trump wanted. He was looking for any legal justification to not certify the election and was even entertaining the idea without one.\nIt's like giving someone a pat on the back for finally doing the right thing after they knowingly did the wrong thing.\nIn addition, that moment of courage by Pence gets completely washed away by his intransigence to comply with the investigation. All he cares about is his political ambitions.",
">\n\nMaybe so. But history will be written with Pence as a hero and that’s okay with me.",
">\n\nAnd cassidy Hutchinson should be. My original point. Yea, his co pilot through this entire shit show is a hero for doing his job. I don't feel bad for the situation they got themselves into. There were more than enough warning signs leading allll the way up to this day.",
">\n\nWelp... That's obstruction / destruction of evidence.",
">\n\nFor all the security cameras in public places you'd think we'd also have them for public offices.",
">\n\nThe difference is the people making those decisions are in the offices.",
">\n\nIt's probably more effective than flushing them.",
">\n\nOr eating them",
">\n\nOr stealing them.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 65%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nFormer Trump White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson indicated Mark Meadows, the White House chief of staff, burned documents in his fireplace roughly a dozen times in the final weeks of the administration, according to newly released transcripts of her House Jan. 6 committee depositions.\n\"The Presidential Records Act only asks that you keep the original copy of a document. So, yes,\" Hutchinson said when asked if she saw Meadows use the fireplace to burn documents.\n\"I know maybe three or four times - between two and four times, he had Mr. Perry in his office right before,\" Hutchinson told the committee, although she cautioned that she did not know what documents were burned.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Hutchinson^#1 Meadows^#2 burn^#3 document^#4 fireplace^#5",
">\n\nMerrick, you're up dude, jesus.",
">\n\nabdicated to jack smith to maintain independence so that the criminal process itself cannot be attacked to avoid justice.",
">\n\nthat was locker room destruction of government property. also trump has complete immunity. ALSO (somehow) he did nothing wrong.",
">\n\nI would assume that any document given to Mark Meadows was printed off and must be on a hard drive somewhere right? It's not the olden days when records were stored only on paper. So why was MM burning them?",
">\n\nHandwritten memos, received old school faxes, typewritten single copies. \nAlthough I did buy a used fax machine years ago that came from a gov’t office and stored on the carbon roll were months of a provincial cabinet minister’s outgoing communications.",
">\n\nShe’s very brave and I hope she can continue speaking truth to this national embarrassment",
">\n\nThis seems rather early 20th century don't you think? Republicans......ever behind the times. LOL.",
">\n\nTruly the Internet Explorer of political parties.",
">\n\nThe political party of AOL dialup.",
">\n\nBrought to you by Carl’s Jr.",
">\n\nWelcome to Costco, I love you",
">\n\nArrest the shitstain and his boss already DOJ.",
">\n\nSo no one is going to prison for this presidential crime spree? Really??",
">\n\nFun little felony.",
">\n\nPence only did the right thing because after talking to his lawyers, he realized he would be on legal trouble. He only did it for his own a**"
] |
>
But what about Hillary’s emails ?
|
[
"It's only clear if one can prove they were originals, not copies. I'm all for holding them accountable but you toss the baby out with the bath water. Be rational and logical.",
">\n\nI’m sure they brunt copies because that’s what you do with incriminating evidence copy it and burn the copies. Jesus man.",
">\n\nI'm just saying... rationally speaking, if you can't prove they were original documents, you cannot jump straight to \"yep that's it, hang em\". Are the odds good that they were originals? I'd say yes, but you have to prove it.",
">\n\nHe was a participant in a criminal conspiracy and he burned documents I would vote to convict.",
">\n\nWithout evidence? What you mentioned is circumstantial. If you're willing to convict someone of a specific crime without specific evidence to back it up, you're no better than they are. You would be acting on emotion and bias rather than evidence and proof. This is how lots of people end up locked up who are actually innocent of the crime in question because they are judged based on other behavior. That is not justice served.",
">\n\nIf you provably conspired to murder someone provably and we find human blood stains on your rug its ok to consider it further proof of the same crime we already proved. \nThere is ample evidence of the criminal conspiracy. There is no motivation in any possible universe where someone guilty of criminal conspiracy burns government documents and we believe that the governments were copies.\nPlease note the word reasonable in reasonable doubt.",
">\n\n\nprovably\n\nTherein lies the problem",
">\n\nWe have ample evidence of conspiracy to subvert democracy",
">\n\nThat's not what's being discussed. We're talking about Meadows burning documents.",
">\n\nLock him up.",
">\n\nMake sure he gets a prison cell with a low flow toilet. Those things piss him off",
">\n\nGuys can't even courtesy flush because by the time they finally get that beefroll down the hatch, it's too late--the stink is everywhere by then. Not me, of course. But Bubba, next cell over--hooWEE! Let me tell you folks, it's true. This is America, can you believe it? Maybe it's fine in Gynna. Their poops are smaller, I guess. Short little people over there. Little people, little poops. And I don't like how you have to pull down the jumpsuit to drop a deuce, either. Everyone says I wear it well, though--the warden, the CO's. No one has ever looked more presidential in a jumpsuit, they say.",
">\n\nThis women deserves the credit mike pence is getting",
">\n\nIt’s really annoying that Mike Pence keeps getting any credit for anything. He showed he had a spine on the one day it matters, and then keeps trying to play the “we just need to put this behind us and focus on the “real”* issues”. Again, Mike Pence did the only thing that mattered of him on Jan 6, good. I’m glad he was there and did that.\nIt doesnt make him a good person. It doesnt make him smart. And without verbally attacking the person who sent a far right mob to kill him, he is fine with his life being put in danger for “owning the libs”. What a spineless piece of shit.\n*real meaning anything I can make up that forces democrats to react to, and usually it has nothing to do with true policy.",
">\n\nEh, you guys are just struggling to give credit where credit is due because of the R next to his name and disagreements on previous policies. Call a spade a spade, the man made a hard decision for the moment and he should be honored for it just like those that voted not to impeach Andrew Johnson in the 1860s and others that came before us who stood to keep our country hole.",
">\n\nIt’s honestly a question of if you think certifying votes should qualify as job done. I’d argue that when you see, firsthand, a fundamental threat to our democracy as the second in command you are duty bound to do more than turn the page.",
">\n\nI agree completely. I’d just like to push back that it’s a lot easier to say this on a Reddit thread than with 60,000 people screaming hang Mike Pence on your front door from constructed gallows. Anyone who says he doesn’t deserve credit is doing so because they are unable to come down from their tower.",
">\n\nThe problem with giving Pence too much credit is that it glosses over the fact that, prior to January 6th, Pence was trying really hard to do what Trump wanted. He was looking for any legal justification to not certify the election and was even entertaining the idea without one.\nIt's like giving someone a pat on the back for finally doing the right thing after they knowingly did the wrong thing.\nIn addition, that moment of courage by Pence gets completely washed away by his intransigence to comply with the investigation. All he cares about is his political ambitions.",
">\n\nMaybe so. But history will be written with Pence as a hero and that’s okay with me.",
">\n\nAnd cassidy Hutchinson should be. My original point. Yea, his co pilot through this entire shit show is a hero for doing his job. I don't feel bad for the situation they got themselves into. There were more than enough warning signs leading allll the way up to this day.",
">\n\nWelp... That's obstruction / destruction of evidence.",
">\n\nFor all the security cameras in public places you'd think we'd also have them for public offices.",
">\n\nThe difference is the people making those decisions are in the offices.",
">\n\nIt's probably more effective than flushing them.",
">\n\nOr eating them",
">\n\nOr stealing them.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 65%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nFormer Trump White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson indicated Mark Meadows, the White House chief of staff, burned documents in his fireplace roughly a dozen times in the final weeks of the administration, according to newly released transcripts of her House Jan. 6 committee depositions.\n\"The Presidential Records Act only asks that you keep the original copy of a document. So, yes,\" Hutchinson said when asked if she saw Meadows use the fireplace to burn documents.\n\"I know maybe three or four times - between two and four times, he had Mr. Perry in his office right before,\" Hutchinson told the committee, although she cautioned that she did not know what documents were burned.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Hutchinson^#1 Meadows^#2 burn^#3 document^#4 fireplace^#5",
">\n\nMerrick, you're up dude, jesus.",
">\n\nabdicated to jack smith to maintain independence so that the criminal process itself cannot be attacked to avoid justice.",
">\n\nthat was locker room destruction of government property. also trump has complete immunity. ALSO (somehow) he did nothing wrong.",
">\n\nI would assume that any document given to Mark Meadows was printed off and must be on a hard drive somewhere right? It's not the olden days when records were stored only on paper. So why was MM burning them?",
">\n\nHandwritten memos, received old school faxes, typewritten single copies. \nAlthough I did buy a used fax machine years ago that came from a gov’t office and stored on the carbon roll were months of a provincial cabinet minister’s outgoing communications.",
">\n\nShe’s very brave and I hope she can continue speaking truth to this national embarrassment",
">\n\nThis seems rather early 20th century don't you think? Republicans......ever behind the times. LOL.",
">\n\nTruly the Internet Explorer of political parties.",
">\n\nThe political party of AOL dialup.",
">\n\nBrought to you by Carl’s Jr.",
">\n\nWelcome to Costco, I love you",
">\n\nArrest the shitstain and his boss already DOJ.",
">\n\nSo no one is going to prison for this presidential crime spree? Really??",
">\n\nFun little felony.",
">\n\nPence only did the right thing because after talking to his lawyers, he realized he would be on legal trouble. He only did it for his own a**",
">\n\nAND after talking with Dan Quayle, checking if there was anything Pence could legally do to stop the certification."
] |
>
She was the one who basically lied about the limo issue, right?
Just checking.
|
[
"It's only clear if one can prove they were originals, not copies. I'm all for holding them accountable but you toss the baby out with the bath water. Be rational and logical.",
">\n\nI’m sure they brunt copies because that’s what you do with incriminating evidence copy it and burn the copies. Jesus man.",
">\n\nI'm just saying... rationally speaking, if you can't prove they were original documents, you cannot jump straight to \"yep that's it, hang em\". Are the odds good that they were originals? I'd say yes, but you have to prove it.",
">\n\nHe was a participant in a criminal conspiracy and he burned documents I would vote to convict.",
">\n\nWithout evidence? What you mentioned is circumstantial. If you're willing to convict someone of a specific crime without specific evidence to back it up, you're no better than they are. You would be acting on emotion and bias rather than evidence and proof. This is how lots of people end up locked up who are actually innocent of the crime in question because they are judged based on other behavior. That is not justice served.",
">\n\nIf you provably conspired to murder someone provably and we find human blood stains on your rug its ok to consider it further proof of the same crime we already proved. \nThere is ample evidence of the criminal conspiracy. There is no motivation in any possible universe where someone guilty of criminal conspiracy burns government documents and we believe that the governments were copies.\nPlease note the word reasonable in reasonable doubt.",
">\n\n\nprovably\n\nTherein lies the problem",
">\n\nWe have ample evidence of conspiracy to subvert democracy",
">\n\nThat's not what's being discussed. We're talking about Meadows burning documents.",
">\n\nLock him up.",
">\n\nMake sure he gets a prison cell with a low flow toilet. Those things piss him off",
">\n\nGuys can't even courtesy flush because by the time they finally get that beefroll down the hatch, it's too late--the stink is everywhere by then. Not me, of course. But Bubba, next cell over--hooWEE! Let me tell you folks, it's true. This is America, can you believe it? Maybe it's fine in Gynna. Their poops are smaller, I guess. Short little people over there. Little people, little poops. And I don't like how you have to pull down the jumpsuit to drop a deuce, either. Everyone says I wear it well, though--the warden, the CO's. No one has ever looked more presidential in a jumpsuit, they say.",
">\n\nThis women deserves the credit mike pence is getting",
">\n\nIt’s really annoying that Mike Pence keeps getting any credit for anything. He showed he had a spine on the one day it matters, and then keeps trying to play the “we just need to put this behind us and focus on the “real”* issues”. Again, Mike Pence did the only thing that mattered of him on Jan 6, good. I’m glad he was there and did that.\nIt doesnt make him a good person. It doesnt make him smart. And without verbally attacking the person who sent a far right mob to kill him, he is fine with his life being put in danger for “owning the libs”. What a spineless piece of shit.\n*real meaning anything I can make up that forces democrats to react to, and usually it has nothing to do with true policy.",
">\n\nEh, you guys are just struggling to give credit where credit is due because of the R next to his name and disagreements on previous policies. Call a spade a spade, the man made a hard decision for the moment and he should be honored for it just like those that voted not to impeach Andrew Johnson in the 1860s and others that came before us who stood to keep our country hole.",
">\n\nIt’s honestly a question of if you think certifying votes should qualify as job done. I’d argue that when you see, firsthand, a fundamental threat to our democracy as the second in command you are duty bound to do more than turn the page.",
">\n\nI agree completely. I’d just like to push back that it’s a lot easier to say this on a Reddit thread than with 60,000 people screaming hang Mike Pence on your front door from constructed gallows. Anyone who says he doesn’t deserve credit is doing so because they are unable to come down from their tower.",
">\n\nThe problem with giving Pence too much credit is that it glosses over the fact that, prior to January 6th, Pence was trying really hard to do what Trump wanted. He was looking for any legal justification to not certify the election and was even entertaining the idea without one.\nIt's like giving someone a pat on the back for finally doing the right thing after they knowingly did the wrong thing.\nIn addition, that moment of courage by Pence gets completely washed away by his intransigence to comply with the investigation. All he cares about is his political ambitions.",
">\n\nMaybe so. But history will be written with Pence as a hero and that’s okay with me.",
">\n\nAnd cassidy Hutchinson should be. My original point. Yea, his co pilot through this entire shit show is a hero for doing his job. I don't feel bad for the situation they got themselves into. There were more than enough warning signs leading allll the way up to this day.",
">\n\nWelp... That's obstruction / destruction of evidence.",
">\n\nFor all the security cameras in public places you'd think we'd also have them for public offices.",
">\n\nThe difference is the people making those decisions are in the offices.",
">\n\nIt's probably more effective than flushing them.",
">\n\nOr eating them",
">\n\nOr stealing them.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 65%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nFormer Trump White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson indicated Mark Meadows, the White House chief of staff, burned documents in his fireplace roughly a dozen times in the final weeks of the administration, according to newly released transcripts of her House Jan. 6 committee depositions.\n\"The Presidential Records Act only asks that you keep the original copy of a document. So, yes,\" Hutchinson said when asked if she saw Meadows use the fireplace to burn documents.\n\"I know maybe three or four times - between two and four times, he had Mr. Perry in his office right before,\" Hutchinson told the committee, although she cautioned that she did not know what documents were burned.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Hutchinson^#1 Meadows^#2 burn^#3 document^#4 fireplace^#5",
">\n\nMerrick, you're up dude, jesus.",
">\n\nabdicated to jack smith to maintain independence so that the criminal process itself cannot be attacked to avoid justice.",
">\n\nthat was locker room destruction of government property. also trump has complete immunity. ALSO (somehow) he did nothing wrong.",
">\n\nI would assume that any document given to Mark Meadows was printed off and must be on a hard drive somewhere right? It's not the olden days when records were stored only on paper. So why was MM burning them?",
">\n\nHandwritten memos, received old school faxes, typewritten single copies. \nAlthough I did buy a used fax machine years ago that came from a gov’t office and stored on the carbon roll were months of a provincial cabinet minister’s outgoing communications.",
">\n\nShe’s very brave and I hope she can continue speaking truth to this national embarrassment",
">\n\nThis seems rather early 20th century don't you think? Republicans......ever behind the times. LOL.",
">\n\nTruly the Internet Explorer of political parties.",
">\n\nThe political party of AOL dialup.",
">\n\nBrought to you by Carl’s Jr.",
">\n\nWelcome to Costco, I love you",
">\n\nArrest the shitstain and his boss already DOJ.",
">\n\nSo no one is going to prison for this presidential crime spree? Really??",
">\n\nFun little felony.",
">\n\nPence only did the right thing because after talking to his lawyers, he realized he would be on legal trouble. He only did it for his own a**",
">\n\nAND after talking with Dan Quayle, checking if there was anything Pence could legally do to stop the certification.",
">\n\nBut what about Hillary’s emails ?"
] |
>
Who else does stuff like this? Wait... I know... Don't tell me...
Oh! The Nazis! They did stuff like this.
|
[
"It's only clear if one can prove they were originals, not copies. I'm all for holding them accountable but you toss the baby out with the bath water. Be rational and logical.",
">\n\nI’m sure they brunt copies because that’s what you do with incriminating evidence copy it and burn the copies. Jesus man.",
">\n\nI'm just saying... rationally speaking, if you can't prove they were original documents, you cannot jump straight to \"yep that's it, hang em\". Are the odds good that they were originals? I'd say yes, but you have to prove it.",
">\n\nHe was a participant in a criminal conspiracy and he burned documents I would vote to convict.",
">\n\nWithout evidence? What you mentioned is circumstantial. If you're willing to convict someone of a specific crime without specific evidence to back it up, you're no better than they are. You would be acting on emotion and bias rather than evidence and proof. This is how lots of people end up locked up who are actually innocent of the crime in question because they are judged based on other behavior. That is not justice served.",
">\n\nIf you provably conspired to murder someone provably and we find human blood stains on your rug its ok to consider it further proof of the same crime we already proved. \nThere is ample evidence of the criminal conspiracy. There is no motivation in any possible universe where someone guilty of criminal conspiracy burns government documents and we believe that the governments were copies.\nPlease note the word reasonable in reasonable doubt.",
">\n\n\nprovably\n\nTherein lies the problem",
">\n\nWe have ample evidence of conspiracy to subvert democracy",
">\n\nThat's not what's being discussed. We're talking about Meadows burning documents.",
">\n\nLock him up.",
">\n\nMake sure he gets a prison cell with a low flow toilet. Those things piss him off",
">\n\nGuys can't even courtesy flush because by the time they finally get that beefroll down the hatch, it's too late--the stink is everywhere by then. Not me, of course. But Bubba, next cell over--hooWEE! Let me tell you folks, it's true. This is America, can you believe it? Maybe it's fine in Gynna. Their poops are smaller, I guess. Short little people over there. Little people, little poops. And I don't like how you have to pull down the jumpsuit to drop a deuce, either. Everyone says I wear it well, though--the warden, the CO's. No one has ever looked more presidential in a jumpsuit, they say.",
">\n\nThis women deserves the credit mike pence is getting",
">\n\nIt’s really annoying that Mike Pence keeps getting any credit for anything. He showed he had a spine on the one day it matters, and then keeps trying to play the “we just need to put this behind us and focus on the “real”* issues”. Again, Mike Pence did the only thing that mattered of him on Jan 6, good. I’m glad he was there and did that.\nIt doesnt make him a good person. It doesnt make him smart. And without verbally attacking the person who sent a far right mob to kill him, he is fine with his life being put in danger for “owning the libs”. What a spineless piece of shit.\n*real meaning anything I can make up that forces democrats to react to, and usually it has nothing to do with true policy.",
">\n\nEh, you guys are just struggling to give credit where credit is due because of the R next to his name and disagreements on previous policies. Call a spade a spade, the man made a hard decision for the moment and he should be honored for it just like those that voted not to impeach Andrew Johnson in the 1860s and others that came before us who stood to keep our country hole.",
">\n\nIt’s honestly a question of if you think certifying votes should qualify as job done. I’d argue that when you see, firsthand, a fundamental threat to our democracy as the second in command you are duty bound to do more than turn the page.",
">\n\nI agree completely. I’d just like to push back that it’s a lot easier to say this on a Reddit thread than with 60,000 people screaming hang Mike Pence on your front door from constructed gallows. Anyone who says he doesn’t deserve credit is doing so because they are unable to come down from their tower.",
">\n\nThe problem with giving Pence too much credit is that it glosses over the fact that, prior to January 6th, Pence was trying really hard to do what Trump wanted. He was looking for any legal justification to not certify the election and was even entertaining the idea without one.\nIt's like giving someone a pat on the back for finally doing the right thing after they knowingly did the wrong thing.\nIn addition, that moment of courage by Pence gets completely washed away by his intransigence to comply with the investigation. All he cares about is his political ambitions.",
">\n\nMaybe so. But history will be written with Pence as a hero and that’s okay with me.",
">\n\nAnd cassidy Hutchinson should be. My original point. Yea, his co pilot through this entire shit show is a hero for doing his job. I don't feel bad for the situation they got themselves into. There were more than enough warning signs leading allll the way up to this day.",
">\n\nWelp... That's obstruction / destruction of evidence.",
">\n\nFor all the security cameras in public places you'd think we'd also have them for public offices.",
">\n\nThe difference is the people making those decisions are in the offices.",
">\n\nIt's probably more effective than flushing them.",
">\n\nOr eating them",
">\n\nOr stealing them.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 65%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nFormer Trump White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson indicated Mark Meadows, the White House chief of staff, burned documents in his fireplace roughly a dozen times in the final weeks of the administration, according to newly released transcripts of her House Jan. 6 committee depositions.\n\"The Presidential Records Act only asks that you keep the original copy of a document. So, yes,\" Hutchinson said when asked if she saw Meadows use the fireplace to burn documents.\n\"I know maybe three or four times - between two and four times, he had Mr. Perry in his office right before,\" Hutchinson told the committee, although she cautioned that she did not know what documents were burned.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Hutchinson^#1 Meadows^#2 burn^#3 document^#4 fireplace^#5",
">\n\nMerrick, you're up dude, jesus.",
">\n\nabdicated to jack smith to maintain independence so that the criminal process itself cannot be attacked to avoid justice.",
">\n\nthat was locker room destruction of government property. also trump has complete immunity. ALSO (somehow) he did nothing wrong.",
">\n\nI would assume that any document given to Mark Meadows was printed off and must be on a hard drive somewhere right? It's not the olden days when records were stored only on paper. So why was MM burning them?",
">\n\nHandwritten memos, received old school faxes, typewritten single copies. \nAlthough I did buy a used fax machine years ago that came from a gov’t office and stored on the carbon roll were months of a provincial cabinet minister’s outgoing communications.",
">\n\nShe’s very brave and I hope she can continue speaking truth to this national embarrassment",
">\n\nThis seems rather early 20th century don't you think? Republicans......ever behind the times. LOL.",
">\n\nTruly the Internet Explorer of political parties.",
">\n\nThe political party of AOL dialup.",
">\n\nBrought to you by Carl’s Jr.",
">\n\nWelcome to Costco, I love you",
">\n\nArrest the shitstain and his boss already DOJ.",
">\n\nSo no one is going to prison for this presidential crime spree? Really??",
">\n\nFun little felony.",
">\n\nPence only did the right thing because after talking to his lawyers, he realized he would be on legal trouble. He only did it for his own a**",
">\n\nAND after talking with Dan Quayle, checking if there was anything Pence could legally do to stop the certification.",
">\n\nBut what about Hillary’s emails ?",
">\n\nShe was the one who basically lied about the limo issue, right?\nJust checking."
] |
>
Arrest him?
|
[
"It's only clear if one can prove they were originals, not copies. I'm all for holding them accountable but you toss the baby out with the bath water. Be rational and logical.",
">\n\nI’m sure they brunt copies because that’s what you do with incriminating evidence copy it and burn the copies. Jesus man.",
">\n\nI'm just saying... rationally speaking, if you can't prove they were original documents, you cannot jump straight to \"yep that's it, hang em\". Are the odds good that they were originals? I'd say yes, but you have to prove it.",
">\n\nHe was a participant in a criminal conspiracy and he burned documents I would vote to convict.",
">\n\nWithout evidence? What you mentioned is circumstantial. If you're willing to convict someone of a specific crime without specific evidence to back it up, you're no better than they are. You would be acting on emotion and bias rather than evidence and proof. This is how lots of people end up locked up who are actually innocent of the crime in question because they are judged based on other behavior. That is not justice served.",
">\n\nIf you provably conspired to murder someone provably and we find human blood stains on your rug its ok to consider it further proof of the same crime we already proved. \nThere is ample evidence of the criminal conspiracy. There is no motivation in any possible universe where someone guilty of criminal conspiracy burns government documents and we believe that the governments were copies.\nPlease note the word reasonable in reasonable doubt.",
">\n\n\nprovably\n\nTherein lies the problem",
">\n\nWe have ample evidence of conspiracy to subvert democracy",
">\n\nThat's not what's being discussed. We're talking about Meadows burning documents.",
">\n\nLock him up.",
">\n\nMake sure he gets a prison cell with a low flow toilet. Those things piss him off",
">\n\nGuys can't even courtesy flush because by the time they finally get that beefroll down the hatch, it's too late--the stink is everywhere by then. Not me, of course. But Bubba, next cell over--hooWEE! Let me tell you folks, it's true. This is America, can you believe it? Maybe it's fine in Gynna. Their poops are smaller, I guess. Short little people over there. Little people, little poops. And I don't like how you have to pull down the jumpsuit to drop a deuce, either. Everyone says I wear it well, though--the warden, the CO's. No one has ever looked more presidential in a jumpsuit, they say.",
">\n\nThis women deserves the credit mike pence is getting",
">\n\nIt’s really annoying that Mike Pence keeps getting any credit for anything. He showed he had a spine on the one day it matters, and then keeps trying to play the “we just need to put this behind us and focus on the “real”* issues”. Again, Mike Pence did the only thing that mattered of him on Jan 6, good. I’m glad he was there and did that.\nIt doesnt make him a good person. It doesnt make him smart. And without verbally attacking the person who sent a far right mob to kill him, he is fine with his life being put in danger for “owning the libs”. What a spineless piece of shit.\n*real meaning anything I can make up that forces democrats to react to, and usually it has nothing to do with true policy.",
">\n\nEh, you guys are just struggling to give credit where credit is due because of the R next to his name and disagreements on previous policies. Call a spade a spade, the man made a hard decision for the moment and he should be honored for it just like those that voted not to impeach Andrew Johnson in the 1860s and others that came before us who stood to keep our country hole.",
">\n\nIt’s honestly a question of if you think certifying votes should qualify as job done. I’d argue that when you see, firsthand, a fundamental threat to our democracy as the second in command you are duty bound to do more than turn the page.",
">\n\nI agree completely. I’d just like to push back that it’s a lot easier to say this on a Reddit thread than with 60,000 people screaming hang Mike Pence on your front door from constructed gallows. Anyone who says he doesn’t deserve credit is doing so because they are unable to come down from their tower.",
">\n\nThe problem with giving Pence too much credit is that it glosses over the fact that, prior to January 6th, Pence was trying really hard to do what Trump wanted. He was looking for any legal justification to not certify the election and was even entertaining the idea without one.\nIt's like giving someone a pat on the back for finally doing the right thing after they knowingly did the wrong thing.\nIn addition, that moment of courage by Pence gets completely washed away by his intransigence to comply with the investigation. All he cares about is his political ambitions.",
">\n\nMaybe so. But history will be written with Pence as a hero and that’s okay with me.",
">\n\nAnd cassidy Hutchinson should be. My original point. Yea, his co pilot through this entire shit show is a hero for doing his job. I don't feel bad for the situation they got themselves into. There were more than enough warning signs leading allll the way up to this day.",
">\n\nWelp... That's obstruction / destruction of evidence.",
">\n\nFor all the security cameras in public places you'd think we'd also have them for public offices.",
">\n\nThe difference is the people making those decisions are in the offices.",
">\n\nIt's probably more effective than flushing them.",
">\n\nOr eating them",
">\n\nOr stealing them.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 65%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nFormer Trump White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson indicated Mark Meadows, the White House chief of staff, burned documents in his fireplace roughly a dozen times in the final weeks of the administration, according to newly released transcripts of her House Jan. 6 committee depositions.\n\"The Presidential Records Act only asks that you keep the original copy of a document. So, yes,\" Hutchinson said when asked if she saw Meadows use the fireplace to burn documents.\n\"I know maybe three or four times - between two and four times, he had Mr. Perry in his office right before,\" Hutchinson told the committee, although she cautioned that she did not know what documents were burned.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Hutchinson^#1 Meadows^#2 burn^#3 document^#4 fireplace^#5",
">\n\nMerrick, you're up dude, jesus.",
">\n\nabdicated to jack smith to maintain independence so that the criminal process itself cannot be attacked to avoid justice.",
">\n\nthat was locker room destruction of government property. also trump has complete immunity. ALSO (somehow) he did nothing wrong.",
">\n\nI would assume that any document given to Mark Meadows was printed off and must be on a hard drive somewhere right? It's not the olden days when records were stored only on paper. So why was MM burning them?",
">\n\nHandwritten memos, received old school faxes, typewritten single copies. \nAlthough I did buy a used fax machine years ago that came from a gov’t office and stored on the carbon roll were months of a provincial cabinet minister’s outgoing communications.",
">\n\nShe’s very brave and I hope she can continue speaking truth to this national embarrassment",
">\n\nThis seems rather early 20th century don't you think? Republicans......ever behind the times. LOL.",
">\n\nTruly the Internet Explorer of political parties.",
">\n\nThe political party of AOL dialup.",
">\n\nBrought to you by Carl’s Jr.",
">\n\nWelcome to Costco, I love you",
">\n\nArrest the shitstain and his boss already DOJ.",
">\n\nSo no one is going to prison for this presidential crime spree? Really??",
">\n\nFun little felony.",
">\n\nPence only did the right thing because after talking to his lawyers, he realized he would be on legal trouble. He only did it for his own a**",
">\n\nAND after talking with Dan Quayle, checking if there was anything Pence could legally do to stop the certification.",
">\n\nBut what about Hillary’s emails ?",
">\n\nShe was the one who basically lied about the limo issue, right?\nJust checking.",
">\n\nWho else does stuff like this? Wait... I know... Don't tell me...\nOh! The Nazis! They did stuff like this."
] |
>
That whole “her email” and “her server” was literally a distraction.
|
[
"It's only clear if one can prove they were originals, not copies. I'm all for holding them accountable but you toss the baby out with the bath water. Be rational and logical.",
">\n\nI’m sure they brunt copies because that’s what you do with incriminating evidence copy it and burn the copies. Jesus man.",
">\n\nI'm just saying... rationally speaking, if you can't prove they were original documents, you cannot jump straight to \"yep that's it, hang em\". Are the odds good that they were originals? I'd say yes, but you have to prove it.",
">\n\nHe was a participant in a criminal conspiracy and he burned documents I would vote to convict.",
">\n\nWithout evidence? What you mentioned is circumstantial. If you're willing to convict someone of a specific crime without specific evidence to back it up, you're no better than they are. You would be acting on emotion and bias rather than evidence and proof. This is how lots of people end up locked up who are actually innocent of the crime in question because they are judged based on other behavior. That is not justice served.",
">\n\nIf you provably conspired to murder someone provably and we find human blood stains on your rug its ok to consider it further proof of the same crime we already proved. \nThere is ample evidence of the criminal conspiracy. There is no motivation in any possible universe where someone guilty of criminal conspiracy burns government documents and we believe that the governments were copies.\nPlease note the word reasonable in reasonable doubt.",
">\n\n\nprovably\n\nTherein lies the problem",
">\n\nWe have ample evidence of conspiracy to subvert democracy",
">\n\nThat's not what's being discussed. We're talking about Meadows burning documents.",
">\n\nLock him up.",
">\n\nMake sure he gets a prison cell with a low flow toilet. Those things piss him off",
">\n\nGuys can't even courtesy flush because by the time they finally get that beefroll down the hatch, it's too late--the stink is everywhere by then. Not me, of course. But Bubba, next cell over--hooWEE! Let me tell you folks, it's true. This is America, can you believe it? Maybe it's fine in Gynna. Their poops are smaller, I guess. Short little people over there. Little people, little poops. And I don't like how you have to pull down the jumpsuit to drop a deuce, either. Everyone says I wear it well, though--the warden, the CO's. No one has ever looked more presidential in a jumpsuit, they say.",
">\n\nThis women deserves the credit mike pence is getting",
">\n\nIt’s really annoying that Mike Pence keeps getting any credit for anything. He showed he had a spine on the one day it matters, and then keeps trying to play the “we just need to put this behind us and focus on the “real”* issues”. Again, Mike Pence did the only thing that mattered of him on Jan 6, good. I’m glad he was there and did that.\nIt doesnt make him a good person. It doesnt make him smart. And without verbally attacking the person who sent a far right mob to kill him, he is fine with his life being put in danger for “owning the libs”. What a spineless piece of shit.\n*real meaning anything I can make up that forces democrats to react to, and usually it has nothing to do with true policy.",
">\n\nEh, you guys are just struggling to give credit where credit is due because of the R next to his name and disagreements on previous policies. Call a spade a spade, the man made a hard decision for the moment and he should be honored for it just like those that voted not to impeach Andrew Johnson in the 1860s and others that came before us who stood to keep our country hole.",
">\n\nIt’s honestly a question of if you think certifying votes should qualify as job done. I’d argue that when you see, firsthand, a fundamental threat to our democracy as the second in command you are duty bound to do more than turn the page.",
">\n\nI agree completely. I’d just like to push back that it’s a lot easier to say this on a Reddit thread than with 60,000 people screaming hang Mike Pence on your front door from constructed gallows. Anyone who says he doesn’t deserve credit is doing so because they are unable to come down from their tower.",
">\n\nThe problem with giving Pence too much credit is that it glosses over the fact that, prior to January 6th, Pence was trying really hard to do what Trump wanted. He was looking for any legal justification to not certify the election and was even entertaining the idea without one.\nIt's like giving someone a pat on the back for finally doing the right thing after they knowingly did the wrong thing.\nIn addition, that moment of courage by Pence gets completely washed away by his intransigence to comply with the investigation. All he cares about is his political ambitions.",
">\n\nMaybe so. But history will be written with Pence as a hero and that’s okay with me.",
">\n\nAnd cassidy Hutchinson should be. My original point. Yea, his co pilot through this entire shit show is a hero for doing his job. I don't feel bad for the situation they got themselves into. There were more than enough warning signs leading allll the way up to this day.",
">\n\nWelp... That's obstruction / destruction of evidence.",
">\n\nFor all the security cameras in public places you'd think we'd also have them for public offices.",
">\n\nThe difference is the people making those decisions are in the offices.",
">\n\nIt's probably more effective than flushing them.",
">\n\nOr eating them",
">\n\nOr stealing them.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 65%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nFormer Trump White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson indicated Mark Meadows, the White House chief of staff, burned documents in his fireplace roughly a dozen times in the final weeks of the administration, according to newly released transcripts of her House Jan. 6 committee depositions.\n\"The Presidential Records Act only asks that you keep the original copy of a document. So, yes,\" Hutchinson said when asked if she saw Meadows use the fireplace to burn documents.\n\"I know maybe three or four times - between two and four times, he had Mr. Perry in his office right before,\" Hutchinson told the committee, although she cautioned that she did not know what documents were burned.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Hutchinson^#1 Meadows^#2 burn^#3 document^#4 fireplace^#5",
">\n\nMerrick, you're up dude, jesus.",
">\n\nabdicated to jack smith to maintain independence so that the criminal process itself cannot be attacked to avoid justice.",
">\n\nthat was locker room destruction of government property. also trump has complete immunity. ALSO (somehow) he did nothing wrong.",
">\n\nI would assume that any document given to Mark Meadows was printed off and must be on a hard drive somewhere right? It's not the olden days when records were stored only on paper. So why was MM burning them?",
">\n\nHandwritten memos, received old school faxes, typewritten single copies. \nAlthough I did buy a used fax machine years ago that came from a gov’t office and stored on the carbon roll were months of a provincial cabinet minister’s outgoing communications.",
">\n\nShe’s very brave and I hope she can continue speaking truth to this national embarrassment",
">\n\nThis seems rather early 20th century don't you think? Republicans......ever behind the times. LOL.",
">\n\nTruly the Internet Explorer of political parties.",
">\n\nThe political party of AOL dialup.",
">\n\nBrought to you by Carl’s Jr.",
">\n\nWelcome to Costco, I love you",
">\n\nArrest the shitstain and his boss already DOJ.",
">\n\nSo no one is going to prison for this presidential crime spree? Really??",
">\n\nFun little felony.",
">\n\nPence only did the right thing because after talking to his lawyers, he realized he would be on legal trouble. He only did it for his own a**",
">\n\nAND after talking with Dan Quayle, checking if there was anything Pence could legally do to stop the certification.",
">\n\nBut what about Hillary’s emails ?",
">\n\nShe was the one who basically lied about the limo issue, right?\nJust checking.",
">\n\nWho else does stuff like this? Wait... I know... Don't tell me...\nOh! The Nazis! They did stuff like this.",
">\n\nArrest him?"
] |
>
Wow. I can’t wait for something to be done about this. /s
|
[
"It's only clear if one can prove they were originals, not copies. I'm all for holding them accountable but you toss the baby out with the bath water. Be rational and logical.",
">\n\nI’m sure they brunt copies because that’s what you do with incriminating evidence copy it and burn the copies. Jesus man.",
">\n\nI'm just saying... rationally speaking, if you can't prove they were original documents, you cannot jump straight to \"yep that's it, hang em\". Are the odds good that they were originals? I'd say yes, but you have to prove it.",
">\n\nHe was a participant in a criminal conspiracy and he burned documents I would vote to convict.",
">\n\nWithout evidence? What you mentioned is circumstantial. If you're willing to convict someone of a specific crime without specific evidence to back it up, you're no better than they are. You would be acting on emotion and bias rather than evidence and proof. This is how lots of people end up locked up who are actually innocent of the crime in question because they are judged based on other behavior. That is not justice served.",
">\n\nIf you provably conspired to murder someone provably and we find human blood stains on your rug its ok to consider it further proof of the same crime we already proved. \nThere is ample evidence of the criminal conspiracy. There is no motivation in any possible universe where someone guilty of criminal conspiracy burns government documents and we believe that the governments were copies.\nPlease note the word reasonable in reasonable doubt.",
">\n\n\nprovably\n\nTherein lies the problem",
">\n\nWe have ample evidence of conspiracy to subvert democracy",
">\n\nThat's not what's being discussed. We're talking about Meadows burning documents.",
">\n\nLock him up.",
">\n\nMake sure he gets a prison cell with a low flow toilet. Those things piss him off",
">\n\nGuys can't even courtesy flush because by the time they finally get that beefroll down the hatch, it's too late--the stink is everywhere by then. Not me, of course. But Bubba, next cell over--hooWEE! Let me tell you folks, it's true. This is America, can you believe it? Maybe it's fine in Gynna. Their poops are smaller, I guess. Short little people over there. Little people, little poops. And I don't like how you have to pull down the jumpsuit to drop a deuce, either. Everyone says I wear it well, though--the warden, the CO's. No one has ever looked more presidential in a jumpsuit, they say.",
">\n\nThis women deserves the credit mike pence is getting",
">\n\nIt’s really annoying that Mike Pence keeps getting any credit for anything. He showed he had a spine on the one day it matters, and then keeps trying to play the “we just need to put this behind us and focus on the “real”* issues”. Again, Mike Pence did the only thing that mattered of him on Jan 6, good. I’m glad he was there and did that.\nIt doesnt make him a good person. It doesnt make him smart. And without verbally attacking the person who sent a far right mob to kill him, he is fine with his life being put in danger for “owning the libs”. What a spineless piece of shit.\n*real meaning anything I can make up that forces democrats to react to, and usually it has nothing to do with true policy.",
">\n\nEh, you guys are just struggling to give credit where credit is due because of the R next to his name and disagreements on previous policies. Call a spade a spade, the man made a hard decision for the moment and he should be honored for it just like those that voted not to impeach Andrew Johnson in the 1860s and others that came before us who stood to keep our country hole.",
">\n\nIt’s honestly a question of if you think certifying votes should qualify as job done. I’d argue that when you see, firsthand, a fundamental threat to our democracy as the second in command you are duty bound to do more than turn the page.",
">\n\nI agree completely. I’d just like to push back that it’s a lot easier to say this on a Reddit thread than with 60,000 people screaming hang Mike Pence on your front door from constructed gallows. Anyone who says he doesn’t deserve credit is doing so because they are unable to come down from their tower.",
">\n\nThe problem with giving Pence too much credit is that it glosses over the fact that, prior to January 6th, Pence was trying really hard to do what Trump wanted. He was looking for any legal justification to not certify the election and was even entertaining the idea without one.\nIt's like giving someone a pat on the back for finally doing the right thing after they knowingly did the wrong thing.\nIn addition, that moment of courage by Pence gets completely washed away by his intransigence to comply with the investigation. All he cares about is his political ambitions.",
">\n\nMaybe so. But history will be written with Pence as a hero and that’s okay with me.",
">\n\nAnd cassidy Hutchinson should be. My original point. Yea, his co pilot through this entire shit show is a hero for doing his job. I don't feel bad for the situation they got themselves into. There were more than enough warning signs leading allll the way up to this day.",
">\n\nWelp... That's obstruction / destruction of evidence.",
">\n\nFor all the security cameras in public places you'd think we'd also have them for public offices.",
">\n\nThe difference is the people making those decisions are in the offices.",
">\n\nIt's probably more effective than flushing them.",
">\n\nOr eating them",
">\n\nOr stealing them.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 65%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nFormer Trump White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson indicated Mark Meadows, the White House chief of staff, burned documents in his fireplace roughly a dozen times in the final weeks of the administration, according to newly released transcripts of her House Jan. 6 committee depositions.\n\"The Presidential Records Act only asks that you keep the original copy of a document. So, yes,\" Hutchinson said when asked if she saw Meadows use the fireplace to burn documents.\n\"I know maybe three or four times - between two and four times, he had Mr. Perry in his office right before,\" Hutchinson told the committee, although she cautioned that she did not know what documents were burned.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Hutchinson^#1 Meadows^#2 burn^#3 document^#4 fireplace^#5",
">\n\nMerrick, you're up dude, jesus.",
">\n\nabdicated to jack smith to maintain independence so that the criminal process itself cannot be attacked to avoid justice.",
">\n\nthat was locker room destruction of government property. also trump has complete immunity. ALSO (somehow) he did nothing wrong.",
">\n\nI would assume that any document given to Mark Meadows was printed off and must be on a hard drive somewhere right? It's not the olden days when records were stored only on paper. So why was MM burning them?",
">\n\nHandwritten memos, received old school faxes, typewritten single copies. \nAlthough I did buy a used fax machine years ago that came from a gov’t office and stored on the carbon roll were months of a provincial cabinet minister’s outgoing communications.",
">\n\nShe’s very brave and I hope she can continue speaking truth to this national embarrassment",
">\n\nThis seems rather early 20th century don't you think? Republicans......ever behind the times. LOL.",
">\n\nTruly the Internet Explorer of political parties.",
">\n\nThe political party of AOL dialup.",
">\n\nBrought to you by Carl’s Jr.",
">\n\nWelcome to Costco, I love you",
">\n\nArrest the shitstain and his boss already DOJ.",
">\n\nSo no one is going to prison for this presidential crime spree? Really??",
">\n\nFun little felony.",
">\n\nPence only did the right thing because after talking to his lawyers, he realized he would be on legal trouble. He only did it for his own a**",
">\n\nAND after talking with Dan Quayle, checking if there was anything Pence could legally do to stop the certification.",
">\n\nBut what about Hillary’s emails ?",
">\n\nShe was the one who basically lied about the limo issue, right?\nJust checking.",
">\n\nWho else does stuff like this? Wait... I know... Don't tell me...\nOh! The Nazis! They did stuff like this.",
">\n\nArrest him?",
">\n\nThat whole “her email” and “her server” was literally a distraction."
] |
>
This is not at all surprising. Piece of shit doing piece of shit things.
|
[
"It's only clear if one can prove they were originals, not copies. I'm all for holding them accountable but you toss the baby out with the bath water. Be rational and logical.",
">\n\nI’m sure they brunt copies because that’s what you do with incriminating evidence copy it and burn the copies. Jesus man.",
">\n\nI'm just saying... rationally speaking, if you can't prove they were original documents, you cannot jump straight to \"yep that's it, hang em\". Are the odds good that they were originals? I'd say yes, but you have to prove it.",
">\n\nHe was a participant in a criminal conspiracy and he burned documents I would vote to convict.",
">\n\nWithout evidence? What you mentioned is circumstantial. If you're willing to convict someone of a specific crime without specific evidence to back it up, you're no better than they are. You would be acting on emotion and bias rather than evidence and proof. This is how lots of people end up locked up who are actually innocent of the crime in question because they are judged based on other behavior. That is not justice served.",
">\n\nIf you provably conspired to murder someone provably and we find human blood stains on your rug its ok to consider it further proof of the same crime we already proved. \nThere is ample evidence of the criminal conspiracy. There is no motivation in any possible universe where someone guilty of criminal conspiracy burns government documents and we believe that the governments were copies.\nPlease note the word reasonable in reasonable doubt.",
">\n\n\nprovably\n\nTherein lies the problem",
">\n\nWe have ample evidence of conspiracy to subvert democracy",
">\n\nThat's not what's being discussed. We're talking about Meadows burning documents.",
">\n\nLock him up.",
">\n\nMake sure he gets a prison cell with a low flow toilet. Those things piss him off",
">\n\nGuys can't even courtesy flush because by the time they finally get that beefroll down the hatch, it's too late--the stink is everywhere by then. Not me, of course. But Bubba, next cell over--hooWEE! Let me tell you folks, it's true. This is America, can you believe it? Maybe it's fine in Gynna. Their poops are smaller, I guess. Short little people over there. Little people, little poops. And I don't like how you have to pull down the jumpsuit to drop a deuce, either. Everyone says I wear it well, though--the warden, the CO's. No one has ever looked more presidential in a jumpsuit, they say.",
">\n\nThis women deserves the credit mike pence is getting",
">\n\nIt’s really annoying that Mike Pence keeps getting any credit for anything. He showed he had a spine on the one day it matters, and then keeps trying to play the “we just need to put this behind us and focus on the “real”* issues”. Again, Mike Pence did the only thing that mattered of him on Jan 6, good. I’m glad he was there and did that.\nIt doesnt make him a good person. It doesnt make him smart. And without verbally attacking the person who sent a far right mob to kill him, he is fine with his life being put in danger for “owning the libs”. What a spineless piece of shit.\n*real meaning anything I can make up that forces democrats to react to, and usually it has nothing to do with true policy.",
">\n\nEh, you guys are just struggling to give credit where credit is due because of the R next to his name and disagreements on previous policies. Call a spade a spade, the man made a hard decision for the moment and he should be honored for it just like those that voted not to impeach Andrew Johnson in the 1860s and others that came before us who stood to keep our country hole.",
">\n\nIt’s honestly a question of if you think certifying votes should qualify as job done. I’d argue that when you see, firsthand, a fundamental threat to our democracy as the second in command you are duty bound to do more than turn the page.",
">\n\nI agree completely. I’d just like to push back that it’s a lot easier to say this on a Reddit thread than with 60,000 people screaming hang Mike Pence on your front door from constructed gallows. Anyone who says he doesn’t deserve credit is doing so because they are unable to come down from their tower.",
">\n\nThe problem with giving Pence too much credit is that it glosses over the fact that, prior to January 6th, Pence was trying really hard to do what Trump wanted. He was looking for any legal justification to not certify the election and was even entertaining the idea without one.\nIt's like giving someone a pat on the back for finally doing the right thing after they knowingly did the wrong thing.\nIn addition, that moment of courage by Pence gets completely washed away by his intransigence to comply with the investigation. All he cares about is his political ambitions.",
">\n\nMaybe so. But history will be written with Pence as a hero and that’s okay with me.",
">\n\nAnd cassidy Hutchinson should be. My original point. Yea, his co pilot through this entire shit show is a hero for doing his job. I don't feel bad for the situation they got themselves into. There were more than enough warning signs leading allll the way up to this day.",
">\n\nWelp... That's obstruction / destruction of evidence.",
">\n\nFor all the security cameras in public places you'd think we'd also have them for public offices.",
">\n\nThe difference is the people making those decisions are in the offices.",
">\n\nIt's probably more effective than flushing them.",
">\n\nOr eating them",
">\n\nOr stealing them.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 65%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nFormer Trump White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson indicated Mark Meadows, the White House chief of staff, burned documents in his fireplace roughly a dozen times in the final weeks of the administration, according to newly released transcripts of her House Jan. 6 committee depositions.\n\"The Presidential Records Act only asks that you keep the original copy of a document. So, yes,\" Hutchinson said when asked if she saw Meadows use the fireplace to burn documents.\n\"I know maybe three or four times - between two and four times, he had Mr. Perry in his office right before,\" Hutchinson told the committee, although she cautioned that she did not know what documents were burned.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Hutchinson^#1 Meadows^#2 burn^#3 document^#4 fireplace^#5",
">\n\nMerrick, you're up dude, jesus.",
">\n\nabdicated to jack smith to maintain independence so that the criminal process itself cannot be attacked to avoid justice.",
">\n\nthat was locker room destruction of government property. also trump has complete immunity. ALSO (somehow) he did nothing wrong.",
">\n\nI would assume that any document given to Mark Meadows was printed off and must be on a hard drive somewhere right? It's not the olden days when records were stored only on paper. So why was MM burning them?",
">\n\nHandwritten memos, received old school faxes, typewritten single copies. \nAlthough I did buy a used fax machine years ago that came from a gov’t office and stored on the carbon roll were months of a provincial cabinet minister’s outgoing communications.",
">\n\nShe’s very brave and I hope she can continue speaking truth to this national embarrassment",
">\n\nThis seems rather early 20th century don't you think? Republicans......ever behind the times. LOL.",
">\n\nTruly the Internet Explorer of political parties.",
">\n\nThe political party of AOL dialup.",
">\n\nBrought to you by Carl’s Jr.",
">\n\nWelcome to Costco, I love you",
">\n\nArrest the shitstain and his boss already DOJ.",
">\n\nSo no one is going to prison for this presidential crime spree? Really??",
">\n\nFun little felony.",
">\n\nPence only did the right thing because after talking to his lawyers, he realized he would be on legal trouble. He only did it for his own a**",
">\n\nAND after talking with Dan Quayle, checking if there was anything Pence could legally do to stop the certification.",
">\n\nBut what about Hillary’s emails ?",
">\n\nShe was the one who basically lied about the limo issue, right?\nJust checking.",
">\n\nWho else does stuff like this? Wait... I know... Don't tell me...\nOh! The Nazis! They did stuff like this.",
">\n\nArrest him?",
">\n\nThat whole “her email” and “her server” was literally a distraction.",
">\n\nWow. I can’t wait for something to be done about this. /s"
] |
>
Meadows was part of the planners for the J6 riots. He better start cooperating before he is sentenced to decades in prison.
|
[
"It's only clear if one can prove they were originals, not copies. I'm all for holding them accountable but you toss the baby out with the bath water. Be rational and logical.",
">\n\nI’m sure they brunt copies because that’s what you do with incriminating evidence copy it and burn the copies. Jesus man.",
">\n\nI'm just saying... rationally speaking, if you can't prove they were original documents, you cannot jump straight to \"yep that's it, hang em\". Are the odds good that they were originals? I'd say yes, but you have to prove it.",
">\n\nHe was a participant in a criminal conspiracy and he burned documents I would vote to convict.",
">\n\nWithout evidence? What you mentioned is circumstantial. If you're willing to convict someone of a specific crime without specific evidence to back it up, you're no better than they are. You would be acting on emotion and bias rather than evidence and proof. This is how lots of people end up locked up who are actually innocent of the crime in question because they are judged based on other behavior. That is not justice served.",
">\n\nIf you provably conspired to murder someone provably and we find human blood stains on your rug its ok to consider it further proof of the same crime we already proved. \nThere is ample evidence of the criminal conspiracy. There is no motivation in any possible universe where someone guilty of criminal conspiracy burns government documents and we believe that the governments were copies.\nPlease note the word reasonable in reasonable doubt.",
">\n\n\nprovably\n\nTherein lies the problem",
">\n\nWe have ample evidence of conspiracy to subvert democracy",
">\n\nThat's not what's being discussed. We're talking about Meadows burning documents.",
">\n\nLock him up.",
">\n\nMake sure he gets a prison cell with a low flow toilet. Those things piss him off",
">\n\nGuys can't even courtesy flush because by the time they finally get that beefroll down the hatch, it's too late--the stink is everywhere by then. Not me, of course. But Bubba, next cell over--hooWEE! Let me tell you folks, it's true. This is America, can you believe it? Maybe it's fine in Gynna. Their poops are smaller, I guess. Short little people over there. Little people, little poops. And I don't like how you have to pull down the jumpsuit to drop a deuce, either. Everyone says I wear it well, though--the warden, the CO's. No one has ever looked more presidential in a jumpsuit, they say.",
">\n\nThis women deserves the credit mike pence is getting",
">\n\nIt’s really annoying that Mike Pence keeps getting any credit for anything. He showed he had a spine on the one day it matters, and then keeps trying to play the “we just need to put this behind us and focus on the “real”* issues”. Again, Mike Pence did the only thing that mattered of him on Jan 6, good. I’m glad he was there and did that.\nIt doesnt make him a good person. It doesnt make him smart. And without verbally attacking the person who sent a far right mob to kill him, he is fine with his life being put in danger for “owning the libs”. What a spineless piece of shit.\n*real meaning anything I can make up that forces democrats to react to, and usually it has nothing to do with true policy.",
">\n\nEh, you guys are just struggling to give credit where credit is due because of the R next to his name and disagreements on previous policies. Call a spade a spade, the man made a hard decision for the moment and he should be honored for it just like those that voted not to impeach Andrew Johnson in the 1860s and others that came before us who stood to keep our country hole.",
">\n\nIt’s honestly a question of if you think certifying votes should qualify as job done. I’d argue that when you see, firsthand, a fundamental threat to our democracy as the second in command you are duty bound to do more than turn the page.",
">\n\nI agree completely. I’d just like to push back that it’s a lot easier to say this on a Reddit thread than with 60,000 people screaming hang Mike Pence on your front door from constructed gallows. Anyone who says he doesn’t deserve credit is doing so because they are unable to come down from their tower.",
">\n\nThe problem with giving Pence too much credit is that it glosses over the fact that, prior to January 6th, Pence was trying really hard to do what Trump wanted. He was looking for any legal justification to not certify the election and was even entertaining the idea without one.\nIt's like giving someone a pat on the back for finally doing the right thing after they knowingly did the wrong thing.\nIn addition, that moment of courage by Pence gets completely washed away by his intransigence to comply with the investigation. All he cares about is his political ambitions.",
">\n\nMaybe so. But history will be written with Pence as a hero and that’s okay with me.",
">\n\nAnd cassidy Hutchinson should be. My original point. Yea, his co pilot through this entire shit show is a hero for doing his job. I don't feel bad for the situation they got themselves into. There were more than enough warning signs leading allll the way up to this day.",
">\n\nWelp... That's obstruction / destruction of evidence.",
">\n\nFor all the security cameras in public places you'd think we'd also have them for public offices.",
">\n\nThe difference is the people making those decisions are in the offices.",
">\n\nIt's probably more effective than flushing them.",
">\n\nOr eating them",
">\n\nOr stealing them.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 65%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nFormer Trump White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson indicated Mark Meadows, the White House chief of staff, burned documents in his fireplace roughly a dozen times in the final weeks of the administration, according to newly released transcripts of her House Jan. 6 committee depositions.\n\"The Presidential Records Act only asks that you keep the original copy of a document. So, yes,\" Hutchinson said when asked if she saw Meadows use the fireplace to burn documents.\n\"I know maybe three or four times - between two and four times, he had Mr. Perry in his office right before,\" Hutchinson told the committee, although she cautioned that she did not know what documents were burned.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Hutchinson^#1 Meadows^#2 burn^#3 document^#4 fireplace^#5",
">\n\nMerrick, you're up dude, jesus.",
">\n\nabdicated to jack smith to maintain independence so that the criminal process itself cannot be attacked to avoid justice.",
">\n\nthat was locker room destruction of government property. also trump has complete immunity. ALSO (somehow) he did nothing wrong.",
">\n\nI would assume that any document given to Mark Meadows was printed off and must be on a hard drive somewhere right? It's not the olden days when records were stored only on paper. So why was MM burning them?",
">\n\nHandwritten memos, received old school faxes, typewritten single copies. \nAlthough I did buy a used fax machine years ago that came from a gov’t office and stored on the carbon roll were months of a provincial cabinet minister’s outgoing communications.",
">\n\nShe’s very brave and I hope she can continue speaking truth to this national embarrassment",
">\n\nThis seems rather early 20th century don't you think? Republicans......ever behind the times. LOL.",
">\n\nTruly the Internet Explorer of political parties.",
">\n\nThe political party of AOL dialup.",
">\n\nBrought to you by Carl’s Jr.",
">\n\nWelcome to Costco, I love you",
">\n\nArrest the shitstain and his boss already DOJ.",
">\n\nSo no one is going to prison for this presidential crime spree? Really??",
">\n\nFun little felony.",
">\n\nPence only did the right thing because after talking to his lawyers, he realized he would be on legal trouble. He only did it for his own a**",
">\n\nAND after talking with Dan Quayle, checking if there was anything Pence could legally do to stop the certification.",
">\n\nBut what about Hillary’s emails ?",
">\n\nShe was the one who basically lied about the limo issue, right?\nJust checking.",
">\n\nWho else does stuff like this? Wait... I know... Don't tell me...\nOh! The Nazis! They did stuff like this.",
">\n\nArrest him?",
">\n\nThat whole “her email” and “her server” was literally a distraction.",
">\n\nWow. I can’t wait for something to be done about this. /s",
">\n\nThis is not at all surprising. Piece of shit doing piece of shit things."
] |
>
When do we start injecting these crooks with Sodium Pentothal?
|
[
"It's only clear if one can prove they were originals, not copies. I'm all for holding them accountable but you toss the baby out with the bath water. Be rational and logical.",
">\n\nI’m sure they brunt copies because that’s what you do with incriminating evidence copy it and burn the copies. Jesus man.",
">\n\nI'm just saying... rationally speaking, if you can't prove they were original documents, you cannot jump straight to \"yep that's it, hang em\". Are the odds good that they were originals? I'd say yes, but you have to prove it.",
">\n\nHe was a participant in a criminal conspiracy and he burned documents I would vote to convict.",
">\n\nWithout evidence? What you mentioned is circumstantial. If you're willing to convict someone of a specific crime without specific evidence to back it up, you're no better than they are. You would be acting on emotion and bias rather than evidence and proof. This is how lots of people end up locked up who are actually innocent of the crime in question because they are judged based on other behavior. That is not justice served.",
">\n\nIf you provably conspired to murder someone provably and we find human blood stains on your rug its ok to consider it further proof of the same crime we already proved. \nThere is ample evidence of the criminal conspiracy. There is no motivation in any possible universe where someone guilty of criminal conspiracy burns government documents and we believe that the governments were copies.\nPlease note the word reasonable in reasonable doubt.",
">\n\n\nprovably\n\nTherein lies the problem",
">\n\nWe have ample evidence of conspiracy to subvert democracy",
">\n\nThat's not what's being discussed. We're talking about Meadows burning documents.",
">\n\nLock him up.",
">\n\nMake sure he gets a prison cell with a low flow toilet. Those things piss him off",
">\n\nGuys can't even courtesy flush because by the time they finally get that beefroll down the hatch, it's too late--the stink is everywhere by then. Not me, of course. But Bubba, next cell over--hooWEE! Let me tell you folks, it's true. This is America, can you believe it? Maybe it's fine in Gynna. Their poops are smaller, I guess. Short little people over there. Little people, little poops. And I don't like how you have to pull down the jumpsuit to drop a deuce, either. Everyone says I wear it well, though--the warden, the CO's. No one has ever looked more presidential in a jumpsuit, they say.",
">\n\nThis women deserves the credit mike pence is getting",
">\n\nIt’s really annoying that Mike Pence keeps getting any credit for anything. He showed he had a spine on the one day it matters, and then keeps trying to play the “we just need to put this behind us and focus on the “real”* issues”. Again, Mike Pence did the only thing that mattered of him on Jan 6, good. I’m glad he was there and did that.\nIt doesnt make him a good person. It doesnt make him smart. And without verbally attacking the person who sent a far right mob to kill him, he is fine with his life being put in danger for “owning the libs”. What a spineless piece of shit.\n*real meaning anything I can make up that forces democrats to react to, and usually it has nothing to do with true policy.",
">\n\nEh, you guys are just struggling to give credit where credit is due because of the R next to his name and disagreements on previous policies. Call a spade a spade, the man made a hard decision for the moment and he should be honored for it just like those that voted not to impeach Andrew Johnson in the 1860s and others that came before us who stood to keep our country hole.",
">\n\nIt’s honestly a question of if you think certifying votes should qualify as job done. I’d argue that when you see, firsthand, a fundamental threat to our democracy as the second in command you are duty bound to do more than turn the page.",
">\n\nI agree completely. I’d just like to push back that it’s a lot easier to say this on a Reddit thread than with 60,000 people screaming hang Mike Pence on your front door from constructed gallows. Anyone who says he doesn’t deserve credit is doing so because they are unable to come down from their tower.",
">\n\nThe problem with giving Pence too much credit is that it glosses over the fact that, prior to January 6th, Pence was trying really hard to do what Trump wanted. He was looking for any legal justification to not certify the election and was even entertaining the idea without one.\nIt's like giving someone a pat on the back for finally doing the right thing after they knowingly did the wrong thing.\nIn addition, that moment of courage by Pence gets completely washed away by his intransigence to comply with the investigation. All he cares about is his political ambitions.",
">\n\nMaybe so. But history will be written with Pence as a hero and that’s okay with me.",
">\n\nAnd cassidy Hutchinson should be. My original point. Yea, his co pilot through this entire shit show is a hero for doing his job. I don't feel bad for the situation they got themselves into. There were more than enough warning signs leading allll the way up to this day.",
">\n\nWelp... That's obstruction / destruction of evidence.",
">\n\nFor all the security cameras in public places you'd think we'd also have them for public offices.",
">\n\nThe difference is the people making those decisions are in the offices.",
">\n\nIt's probably more effective than flushing them.",
">\n\nOr eating them",
">\n\nOr stealing them.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 65%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nFormer Trump White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson indicated Mark Meadows, the White House chief of staff, burned documents in his fireplace roughly a dozen times in the final weeks of the administration, according to newly released transcripts of her House Jan. 6 committee depositions.\n\"The Presidential Records Act only asks that you keep the original copy of a document. So, yes,\" Hutchinson said when asked if she saw Meadows use the fireplace to burn documents.\n\"I know maybe three or four times - between two and four times, he had Mr. Perry in his office right before,\" Hutchinson told the committee, although she cautioned that she did not know what documents were burned.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Hutchinson^#1 Meadows^#2 burn^#3 document^#4 fireplace^#5",
">\n\nMerrick, you're up dude, jesus.",
">\n\nabdicated to jack smith to maintain independence so that the criminal process itself cannot be attacked to avoid justice.",
">\n\nthat was locker room destruction of government property. also trump has complete immunity. ALSO (somehow) he did nothing wrong.",
">\n\nI would assume that any document given to Mark Meadows was printed off and must be on a hard drive somewhere right? It's not the olden days when records were stored only on paper. So why was MM burning them?",
">\n\nHandwritten memos, received old school faxes, typewritten single copies. \nAlthough I did buy a used fax machine years ago that came from a gov’t office and stored on the carbon roll were months of a provincial cabinet minister’s outgoing communications.",
">\n\nShe’s very brave and I hope she can continue speaking truth to this national embarrassment",
">\n\nThis seems rather early 20th century don't you think? Republicans......ever behind the times. LOL.",
">\n\nTruly the Internet Explorer of political parties.",
">\n\nThe political party of AOL dialup.",
">\n\nBrought to you by Carl’s Jr.",
">\n\nWelcome to Costco, I love you",
">\n\nArrest the shitstain and his boss already DOJ.",
">\n\nSo no one is going to prison for this presidential crime spree? Really??",
">\n\nFun little felony.",
">\n\nPence only did the right thing because after talking to his lawyers, he realized he would be on legal trouble. He only did it for his own a**",
">\n\nAND after talking with Dan Quayle, checking if there was anything Pence could legally do to stop the certification.",
">\n\nBut what about Hillary’s emails ?",
">\n\nShe was the one who basically lied about the limo issue, right?\nJust checking.",
">\n\nWho else does stuff like this? Wait... I know... Don't tell me...\nOh! The Nazis! They did stuff like this.",
">\n\nArrest him?",
">\n\nThat whole “her email” and “her server” was literally a distraction.",
">\n\nWow. I can’t wait for something to be done about this. /s",
">\n\nThis is not at all surprising. Piece of shit doing piece of shit things.",
">\n\nMeadows was part of the planners for the J6 riots. He better start cooperating before he is sentenced to decades in prison."
] |
>
Put Meadows in jail already
|
[
"It's only clear if one can prove they were originals, not copies. I'm all for holding them accountable but you toss the baby out with the bath water. Be rational and logical.",
">\n\nI’m sure they brunt copies because that’s what you do with incriminating evidence copy it and burn the copies. Jesus man.",
">\n\nI'm just saying... rationally speaking, if you can't prove they were original documents, you cannot jump straight to \"yep that's it, hang em\". Are the odds good that they were originals? I'd say yes, but you have to prove it.",
">\n\nHe was a participant in a criminal conspiracy and he burned documents I would vote to convict.",
">\n\nWithout evidence? What you mentioned is circumstantial. If you're willing to convict someone of a specific crime without specific evidence to back it up, you're no better than they are. You would be acting on emotion and bias rather than evidence and proof. This is how lots of people end up locked up who are actually innocent of the crime in question because they are judged based on other behavior. That is not justice served.",
">\n\nIf you provably conspired to murder someone provably and we find human blood stains on your rug its ok to consider it further proof of the same crime we already proved. \nThere is ample evidence of the criminal conspiracy. There is no motivation in any possible universe where someone guilty of criminal conspiracy burns government documents and we believe that the governments were copies.\nPlease note the word reasonable in reasonable doubt.",
">\n\n\nprovably\n\nTherein lies the problem",
">\n\nWe have ample evidence of conspiracy to subvert democracy",
">\n\nThat's not what's being discussed. We're talking about Meadows burning documents.",
">\n\nLock him up.",
">\n\nMake sure he gets a prison cell with a low flow toilet. Those things piss him off",
">\n\nGuys can't even courtesy flush because by the time they finally get that beefroll down the hatch, it's too late--the stink is everywhere by then. Not me, of course. But Bubba, next cell over--hooWEE! Let me tell you folks, it's true. This is America, can you believe it? Maybe it's fine in Gynna. Their poops are smaller, I guess. Short little people over there. Little people, little poops. And I don't like how you have to pull down the jumpsuit to drop a deuce, either. Everyone says I wear it well, though--the warden, the CO's. No one has ever looked more presidential in a jumpsuit, they say.",
">\n\nThis women deserves the credit mike pence is getting",
">\n\nIt’s really annoying that Mike Pence keeps getting any credit for anything. He showed he had a spine on the one day it matters, and then keeps trying to play the “we just need to put this behind us and focus on the “real”* issues”. Again, Mike Pence did the only thing that mattered of him on Jan 6, good. I’m glad he was there and did that.\nIt doesnt make him a good person. It doesnt make him smart. And without verbally attacking the person who sent a far right mob to kill him, he is fine with his life being put in danger for “owning the libs”. What a spineless piece of shit.\n*real meaning anything I can make up that forces democrats to react to, and usually it has nothing to do with true policy.",
">\n\nEh, you guys are just struggling to give credit where credit is due because of the R next to his name and disagreements on previous policies. Call a spade a spade, the man made a hard decision for the moment and he should be honored for it just like those that voted not to impeach Andrew Johnson in the 1860s and others that came before us who stood to keep our country hole.",
">\n\nIt’s honestly a question of if you think certifying votes should qualify as job done. I’d argue that when you see, firsthand, a fundamental threat to our democracy as the second in command you are duty bound to do more than turn the page.",
">\n\nI agree completely. I’d just like to push back that it’s a lot easier to say this on a Reddit thread than with 60,000 people screaming hang Mike Pence on your front door from constructed gallows. Anyone who says he doesn’t deserve credit is doing so because they are unable to come down from their tower.",
">\n\nThe problem with giving Pence too much credit is that it glosses over the fact that, prior to January 6th, Pence was trying really hard to do what Trump wanted. He was looking for any legal justification to not certify the election and was even entertaining the idea without one.\nIt's like giving someone a pat on the back for finally doing the right thing after they knowingly did the wrong thing.\nIn addition, that moment of courage by Pence gets completely washed away by his intransigence to comply with the investigation. All he cares about is his political ambitions.",
">\n\nMaybe so. But history will be written with Pence as a hero and that’s okay with me.",
">\n\nAnd cassidy Hutchinson should be. My original point. Yea, his co pilot through this entire shit show is a hero for doing his job. I don't feel bad for the situation they got themselves into. There were more than enough warning signs leading allll the way up to this day.",
">\n\nWelp... That's obstruction / destruction of evidence.",
">\n\nFor all the security cameras in public places you'd think we'd also have them for public offices.",
">\n\nThe difference is the people making those decisions are in the offices.",
">\n\nIt's probably more effective than flushing them.",
">\n\nOr eating them",
">\n\nOr stealing them.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 65%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nFormer Trump White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson indicated Mark Meadows, the White House chief of staff, burned documents in his fireplace roughly a dozen times in the final weeks of the administration, according to newly released transcripts of her House Jan. 6 committee depositions.\n\"The Presidential Records Act only asks that you keep the original copy of a document. So, yes,\" Hutchinson said when asked if she saw Meadows use the fireplace to burn documents.\n\"I know maybe three or four times - between two and four times, he had Mr. Perry in his office right before,\" Hutchinson told the committee, although she cautioned that she did not know what documents were burned.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Hutchinson^#1 Meadows^#2 burn^#3 document^#4 fireplace^#5",
">\n\nMerrick, you're up dude, jesus.",
">\n\nabdicated to jack smith to maintain independence so that the criminal process itself cannot be attacked to avoid justice.",
">\n\nthat was locker room destruction of government property. also trump has complete immunity. ALSO (somehow) he did nothing wrong.",
">\n\nI would assume that any document given to Mark Meadows was printed off and must be on a hard drive somewhere right? It's not the olden days when records were stored only on paper. So why was MM burning them?",
">\n\nHandwritten memos, received old school faxes, typewritten single copies. \nAlthough I did buy a used fax machine years ago that came from a gov’t office and stored on the carbon roll were months of a provincial cabinet minister’s outgoing communications.",
">\n\nShe’s very brave and I hope she can continue speaking truth to this national embarrassment",
">\n\nThis seems rather early 20th century don't you think? Republicans......ever behind the times. LOL.",
">\n\nTruly the Internet Explorer of political parties.",
">\n\nThe political party of AOL dialup.",
">\n\nBrought to you by Carl’s Jr.",
">\n\nWelcome to Costco, I love you",
">\n\nArrest the shitstain and his boss already DOJ.",
">\n\nSo no one is going to prison for this presidential crime spree? Really??",
">\n\nFun little felony.",
">\n\nPence only did the right thing because after talking to his lawyers, he realized he would be on legal trouble. He only did it for his own a**",
">\n\nAND after talking with Dan Quayle, checking if there was anything Pence could legally do to stop the certification.",
">\n\nBut what about Hillary’s emails ?",
">\n\nShe was the one who basically lied about the limo issue, right?\nJust checking.",
">\n\nWho else does stuff like this? Wait... I know... Don't tell me...\nOh! The Nazis! They did stuff like this.",
">\n\nArrest him?",
">\n\nThat whole “her email” and “her server” was literally a distraction.",
">\n\nWow. I can’t wait for something to be done about this. /s",
">\n\nThis is not at all surprising. Piece of shit doing piece of shit things.",
">\n\nMeadows was part of the planners for the J6 riots. He better start cooperating before he is sentenced to decades in prison.",
">\n\nWhen do we start injecting these crooks with Sodium Pentothal?"
] |
>
Nohing will happen.
|
[
"It's only clear if one can prove they were originals, not copies. I'm all for holding them accountable but you toss the baby out with the bath water. Be rational and logical.",
">\n\nI’m sure they brunt copies because that’s what you do with incriminating evidence copy it and burn the copies. Jesus man.",
">\n\nI'm just saying... rationally speaking, if you can't prove they were original documents, you cannot jump straight to \"yep that's it, hang em\". Are the odds good that they were originals? I'd say yes, but you have to prove it.",
">\n\nHe was a participant in a criminal conspiracy and he burned documents I would vote to convict.",
">\n\nWithout evidence? What you mentioned is circumstantial. If you're willing to convict someone of a specific crime without specific evidence to back it up, you're no better than they are. You would be acting on emotion and bias rather than evidence and proof. This is how lots of people end up locked up who are actually innocent of the crime in question because they are judged based on other behavior. That is not justice served.",
">\n\nIf you provably conspired to murder someone provably and we find human blood stains on your rug its ok to consider it further proof of the same crime we already proved. \nThere is ample evidence of the criminal conspiracy. There is no motivation in any possible universe where someone guilty of criminal conspiracy burns government documents and we believe that the governments were copies.\nPlease note the word reasonable in reasonable doubt.",
">\n\n\nprovably\n\nTherein lies the problem",
">\n\nWe have ample evidence of conspiracy to subvert democracy",
">\n\nThat's not what's being discussed. We're talking about Meadows burning documents.",
">\n\nLock him up.",
">\n\nMake sure he gets a prison cell with a low flow toilet. Those things piss him off",
">\n\nGuys can't even courtesy flush because by the time they finally get that beefroll down the hatch, it's too late--the stink is everywhere by then. Not me, of course. But Bubba, next cell over--hooWEE! Let me tell you folks, it's true. This is America, can you believe it? Maybe it's fine in Gynna. Their poops are smaller, I guess. Short little people over there. Little people, little poops. And I don't like how you have to pull down the jumpsuit to drop a deuce, either. Everyone says I wear it well, though--the warden, the CO's. No one has ever looked more presidential in a jumpsuit, they say.",
">\n\nThis women deserves the credit mike pence is getting",
">\n\nIt’s really annoying that Mike Pence keeps getting any credit for anything. He showed he had a spine on the one day it matters, and then keeps trying to play the “we just need to put this behind us and focus on the “real”* issues”. Again, Mike Pence did the only thing that mattered of him on Jan 6, good. I’m glad he was there and did that.\nIt doesnt make him a good person. It doesnt make him smart. And without verbally attacking the person who sent a far right mob to kill him, he is fine with his life being put in danger for “owning the libs”. What a spineless piece of shit.\n*real meaning anything I can make up that forces democrats to react to, and usually it has nothing to do with true policy.",
">\n\nEh, you guys are just struggling to give credit where credit is due because of the R next to his name and disagreements on previous policies. Call a spade a spade, the man made a hard decision for the moment and he should be honored for it just like those that voted not to impeach Andrew Johnson in the 1860s and others that came before us who stood to keep our country hole.",
">\n\nIt’s honestly a question of if you think certifying votes should qualify as job done. I’d argue that when you see, firsthand, a fundamental threat to our democracy as the second in command you are duty bound to do more than turn the page.",
">\n\nI agree completely. I’d just like to push back that it’s a lot easier to say this on a Reddit thread than with 60,000 people screaming hang Mike Pence on your front door from constructed gallows. Anyone who says he doesn’t deserve credit is doing so because they are unable to come down from their tower.",
">\n\nThe problem with giving Pence too much credit is that it glosses over the fact that, prior to January 6th, Pence was trying really hard to do what Trump wanted. He was looking for any legal justification to not certify the election and was even entertaining the idea without one.\nIt's like giving someone a pat on the back for finally doing the right thing after they knowingly did the wrong thing.\nIn addition, that moment of courage by Pence gets completely washed away by his intransigence to comply with the investigation. All he cares about is his political ambitions.",
">\n\nMaybe so. But history will be written with Pence as a hero and that’s okay with me.",
">\n\nAnd cassidy Hutchinson should be. My original point. Yea, his co pilot through this entire shit show is a hero for doing his job. I don't feel bad for the situation they got themselves into. There were more than enough warning signs leading allll the way up to this day.",
">\n\nWelp... That's obstruction / destruction of evidence.",
">\n\nFor all the security cameras in public places you'd think we'd also have them for public offices.",
">\n\nThe difference is the people making those decisions are in the offices.",
">\n\nIt's probably more effective than flushing them.",
">\n\nOr eating them",
">\n\nOr stealing them.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 65%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nFormer Trump White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson indicated Mark Meadows, the White House chief of staff, burned documents in his fireplace roughly a dozen times in the final weeks of the administration, according to newly released transcripts of her House Jan. 6 committee depositions.\n\"The Presidential Records Act only asks that you keep the original copy of a document. So, yes,\" Hutchinson said when asked if she saw Meadows use the fireplace to burn documents.\n\"I know maybe three or four times - between two and four times, he had Mr. Perry in his office right before,\" Hutchinson told the committee, although she cautioned that she did not know what documents were burned.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Hutchinson^#1 Meadows^#2 burn^#3 document^#4 fireplace^#5",
">\n\nMerrick, you're up dude, jesus.",
">\n\nabdicated to jack smith to maintain independence so that the criminal process itself cannot be attacked to avoid justice.",
">\n\nthat was locker room destruction of government property. also trump has complete immunity. ALSO (somehow) he did nothing wrong.",
">\n\nI would assume that any document given to Mark Meadows was printed off and must be on a hard drive somewhere right? It's not the olden days when records were stored only on paper. So why was MM burning them?",
">\n\nHandwritten memos, received old school faxes, typewritten single copies. \nAlthough I did buy a used fax machine years ago that came from a gov’t office and stored on the carbon roll were months of a provincial cabinet minister’s outgoing communications.",
">\n\nShe’s very brave and I hope she can continue speaking truth to this national embarrassment",
">\n\nThis seems rather early 20th century don't you think? Republicans......ever behind the times. LOL.",
">\n\nTruly the Internet Explorer of political parties.",
">\n\nThe political party of AOL dialup.",
">\n\nBrought to you by Carl’s Jr.",
">\n\nWelcome to Costco, I love you",
">\n\nArrest the shitstain and his boss already DOJ.",
">\n\nSo no one is going to prison for this presidential crime spree? Really??",
">\n\nFun little felony.",
">\n\nPence only did the right thing because after talking to his lawyers, he realized he would be on legal trouble. He only did it for his own a**",
">\n\nAND after talking with Dan Quayle, checking if there was anything Pence could legally do to stop the certification.",
">\n\nBut what about Hillary’s emails ?",
">\n\nShe was the one who basically lied about the limo issue, right?\nJust checking.",
">\n\nWho else does stuff like this? Wait... I know... Don't tell me...\nOh! The Nazis! They did stuff like this.",
">\n\nArrest him?",
">\n\nThat whole “her email” and “her server” was literally a distraction.",
">\n\nWow. I can’t wait for something to be done about this. /s",
">\n\nThis is not at all surprising. Piece of shit doing piece of shit things.",
">\n\nMeadows was part of the planners for the J6 riots. He better start cooperating before he is sentenced to decades in prison.",
">\n\nWhen do we start injecting these crooks with Sodium Pentothal?",
">\n\nPut Meadows in jail already"
] |
>
Cool, can't wait for the DOJ to continue to do nothing.
|
[
"It's only clear if one can prove they were originals, not copies. I'm all for holding them accountable but you toss the baby out with the bath water. Be rational and logical.",
">\n\nI’m sure they brunt copies because that’s what you do with incriminating evidence copy it and burn the copies. Jesus man.",
">\n\nI'm just saying... rationally speaking, if you can't prove they were original documents, you cannot jump straight to \"yep that's it, hang em\". Are the odds good that they were originals? I'd say yes, but you have to prove it.",
">\n\nHe was a participant in a criminal conspiracy and he burned documents I would vote to convict.",
">\n\nWithout evidence? What you mentioned is circumstantial. If you're willing to convict someone of a specific crime without specific evidence to back it up, you're no better than they are. You would be acting on emotion and bias rather than evidence and proof. This is how lots of people end up locked up who are actually innocent of the crime in question because they are judged based on other behavior. That is not justice served.",
">\n\nIf you provably conspired to murder someone provably and we find human blood stains on your rug its ok to consider it further proof of the same crime we already proved. \nThere is ample evidence of the criminal conspiracy. There is no motivation in any possible universe where someone guilty of criminal conspiracy burns government documents and we believe that the governments were copies.\nPlease note the word reasonable in reasonable doubt.",
">\n\n\nprovably\n\nTherein lies the problem",
">\n\nWe have ample evidence of conspiracy to subvert democracy",
">\n\nThat's not what's being discussed. We're talking about Meadows burning documents.",
">\n\nLock him up.",
">\n\nMake sure he gets a prison cell with a low flow toilet. Those things piss him off",
">\n\nGuys can't even courtesy flush because by the time they finally get that beefroll down the hatch, it's too late--the stink is everywhere by then. Not me, of course. But Bubba, next cell over--hooWEE! Let me tell you folks, it's true. This is America, can you believe it? Maybe it's fine in Gynna. Their poops are smaller, I guess. Short little people over there. Little people, little poops. And I don't like how you have to pull down the jumpsuit to drop a deuce, either. Everyone says I wear it well, though--the warden, the CO's. No one has ever looked more presidential in a jumpsuit, they say.",
">\n\nThis women deserves the credit mike pence is getting",
">\n\nIt’s really annoying that Mike Pence keeps getting any credit for anything. He showed he had a spine on the one day it matters, and then keeps trying to play the “we just need to put this behind us and focus on the “real”* issues”. Again, Mike Pence did the only thing that mattered of him on Jan 6, good. I’m glad he was there and did that.\nIt doesnt make him a good person. It doesnt make him smart. And without verbally attacking the person who sent a far right mob to kill him, he is fine with his life being put in danger for “owning the libs”. What a spineless piece of shit.\n*real meaning anything I can make up that forces democrats to react to, and usually it has nothing to do with true policy.",
">\n\nEh, you guys are just struggling to give credit where credit is due because of the R next to his name and disagreements on previous policies. Call a spade a spade, the man made a hard decision for the moment and he should be honored for it just like those that voted not to impeach Andrew Johnson in the 1860s and others that came before us who stood to keep our country hole.",
">\n\nIt’s honestly a question of if you think certifying votes should qualify as job done. I’d argue that when you see, firsthand, a fundamental threat to our democracy as the second in command you are duty bound to do more than turn the page.",
">\n\nI agree completely. I’d just like to push back that it’s a lot easier to say this on a Reddit thread than with 60,000 people screaming hang Mike Pence on your front door from constructed gallows. Anyone who says he doesn’t deserve credit is doing so because they are unable to come down from their tower.",
">\n\nThe problem with giving Pence too much credit is that it glosses over the fact that, prior to January 6th, Pence was trying really hard to do what Trump wanted. He was looking for any legal justification to not certify the election and was even entertaining the idea without one.\nIt's like giving someone a pat on the back for finally doing the right thing after they knowingly did the wrong thing.\nIn addition, that moment of courage by Pence gets completely washed away by his intransigence to comply with the investigation. All he cares about is his political ambitions.",
">\n\nMaybe so. But history will be written with Pence as a hero and that’s okay with me.",
">\n\nAnd cassidy Hutchinson should be. My original point. Yea, his co pilot through this entire shit show is a hero for doing his job. I don't feel bad for the situation they got themselves into. There were more than enough warning signs leading allll the way up to this day.",
">\n\nWelp... That's obstruction / destruction of evidence.",
">\n\nFor all the security cameras in public places you'd think we'd also have them for public offices.",
">\n\nThe difference is the people making those decisions are in the offices.",
">\n\nIt's probably more effective than flushing them.",
">\n\nOr eating them",
">\n\nOr stealing them.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 65%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nFormer Trump White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson indicated Mark Meadows, the White House chief of staff, burned documents in his fireplace roughly a dozen times in the final weeks of the administration, according to newly released transcripts of her House Jan. 6 committee depositions.\n\"The Presidential Records Act only asks that you keep the original copy of a document. So, yes,\" Hutchinson said when asked if she saw Meadows use the fireplace to burn documents.\n\"I know maybe three or four times - between two and four times, he had Mr. Perry in his office right before,\" Hutchinson told the committee, although she cautioned that she did not know what documents were burned.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Hutchinson^#1 Meadows^#2 burn^#3 document^#4 fireplace^#5",
">\n\nMerrick, you're up dude, jesus.",
">\n\nabdicated to jack smith to maintain independence so that the criminal process itself cannot be attacked to avoid justice.",
">\n\nthat was locker room destruction of government property. also trump has complete immunity. ALSO (somehow) he did nothing wrong.",
">\n\nI would assume that any document given to Mark Meadows was printed off and must be on a hard drive somewhere right? It's not the olden days when records were stored only on paper. So why was MM burning them?",
">\n\nHandwritten memos, received old school faxes, typewritten single copies. \nAlthough I did buy a used fax machine years ago that came from a gov’t office and stored on the carbon roll were months of a provincial cabinet minister’s outgoing communications.",
">\n\nShe’s very brave and I hope she can continue speaking truth to this national embarrassment",
">\n\nThis seems rather early 20th century don't you think? Republicans......ever behind the times. LOL.",
">\n\nTruly the Internet Explorer of political parties.",
">\n\nThe political party of AOL dialup.",
">\n\nBrought to you by Carl’s Jr.",
">\n\nWelcome to Costco, I love you",
">\n\nArrest the shitstain and his boss already DOJ.",
">\n\nSo no one is going to prison for this presidential crime spree? Really??",
">\n\nFun little felony.",
">\n\nPence only did the right thing because after talking to his lawyers, he realized he would be on legal trouble. He only did it for his own a**",
">\n\nAND after talking with Dan Quayle, checking if there was anything Pence could legally do to stop the certification.",
">\n\nBut what about Hillary’s emails ?",
">\n\nShe was the one who basically lied about the limo issue, right?\nJust checking.",
">\n\nWho else does stuff like this? Wait... I know... Don't tell me...\nOh! The Nazis! They did stuff like this.",
">\n\nArrest him?",
">\n\nThat whole “her email” and “her server” was literally a distraction.",
">\n\nWow. I can’t wait for something to be done about this. /s",
">\n\nThis is not at all surprising. Piece of shit doing piece of shit things.",
">\n\nMeadows was part of the planners for the J6 riots. He better start cooperating before he is sentenced to decades in prison.",
">\n\nWhen do we start injecting these crooks with Sodium Pentothal?",
">\n\nPut Meadows in jail already",
">\n\nNohing will happen."
] |
>
Pence should have been a Leader and not a Denier, if he had half the spine Cassy has, he would be the leading 2024 GOP nominee!!!
|
[
"It's only clear if one can prove they were originals, not copies. I'm all for holding them accountable but you toss the baby out with the bath water. Be rational and logical.",
">\n\nI’m sure they brunt copies because that’s what you do with incriminating evidence copy it and burn the copies. Jesus man.",
">\n\nI'm just saying... rationally speaking, if you can't prove they were original documents, you cannot jump straight to \"yep that's it, hang em\". Are the odds good that they were originals? I'd say yes, but you have to prove it.",
">\n\nHe was a participant in a criminal conspiracy and he burned documents I would vote to convict.",
">\n\nWithout evidence? What you mentioned is circumstantial. If you're willing to convict someone of a specific crime without specific evidence to back it up, you're no better than they are. You would be acting on emotion and bias rather than evidence and proof. This is how lots of people end up locked up who are actually innocent of the crime in question because they are judged based on other behavior. That is not justice served.",
">\n\nIf you provably conspired to murder someone provably and we find human blood stains on your rug its ok to consider it further proof of the same crime we already proved. \nThere is ample evidence of the criminal conspiracy. There is no motivation in any possible universe where someone guilty of criminal conspiracy burns government documents and we believe that the governments were copies.\nPlease note the word reasonable in reasonable doubt.",
">\n\n\nprovably\n\nTherein lies the problem",
">\n\nWe have ample evidence of conspiracy to subvert democracy",
">\n\nThat's not what's being discussed. We're talking about Meadows burning documents.",
">\n\nLock him up.",
">\n\nMake sure he gets a prison cell with a low flow toilet. Those things piss him off",
">\n\nGuys can't even courtesy flush because by the time they finally get that beefroll down the hatch, it's too late--the stink is everywhere by then. Not me, of course. But Bubba, next cell over--hooWEE! Let me tell you folks, it's true. This is America, can you believe it? Maybe it's fine in Gynna. Their poops are smaller, I guess. Short little people over there. Little people, little poops. And I don't like how you have to pull down the jumpsuit to drop a deuce, either. Everyone says I wear it well, though--the warden, the CO's. No one has ever looked more presidential in a jumpsuit, they say.",
">\n\nThis women deserves the credit mike pence is getting",
">\n\nIt’s really annoying that Mike Pence keeps getting any credit for anything. He showed he had a spine on the one day it matters, and then keeps trying to play the “we just need to put this behind us and focus on the “real”* issues”. Again, Mike Pence did the only thing that mattered of him on Jan 6, good. I’m glad he was there and did that.\nIt doesnt make him a good person. It doesnt make him smart. And without verbally attacking the person who sent a far right mob to kill him, he is fine with his life being put in danger for “owning the libs”. What a spineless piece of shit.\n*real meaning anything I can make up that forces democrats to react to, and usually it has nothing to do with true policy.",
">\n\nEh, you guys are just struggling to give credit where credit is due because of the R next to his name and disagreements on previous policies. Call a spade a spade, the man made a hard decision for the moment and he should be honored for it just like those that voted not to impeach Andrew Johnson in the 1860s and others that came before us who stood to keep our country hole.",
">\n\nIt’s honestly a question of if you think certifying votes should qualify as job done. I’d argue that when you see, firsthand, a fundamental threat to our democracy as the second in command you are duty bound to do more than turn the page.",
">\n\nI agree completely. I’d just like to push back that it’s a lot easier to say this on a Reddit thread than with 60,000 people screaming hang Mike Pence on your front door from constructed gallows. Anyone who says he doesn’t deserve credit is doing so because they are unable to come down from their tower.",
">\n\nThe problem with giving Pence too much credit is that it glosses over the fact that, prior to January 6th, Pence was trying really hard to do what Trump wanted. He was looking for any legal justification to not certify the election and was even entertaining the idea without one.\nIt's like giving someone a pat on the back for finally doing the right thing after they knowingly did the wrong thing.\nIn addition, that moment of courage by Pence gets completely washed away by his intransigence to comply with the investigation. All he cares about is his political ambitions.",
">\n\nMaybe so. But history will be written with Pence as a hero and that’s okay with me.",
">\n\nAnd cassidy Hutchinson should be. My original point. Yea, his co pilot through this entire shit show is a hero for doing his job. I don't feel bad for the situation they got themselves into. There were more than enough warning signs leading allll the way up to this day.",
">\n\nWelp... That's obstruction / destruction of evidence.",
">\n\nFor all the security cameras in public places you'd think we'd also have them for public offices.",
">\n\nThe difference is the people making those decisions are in the offices.",
">\n\nIt's probably more effective than flushing them.",
">\n\nOr eating them",
">\n\nOr stealing them.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 65%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nFormer Trump White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson indicated Mark Meadows, the White House chief of staff, burned documents in his fireplace roughly a dozen times in the final weeks of the administration, according to newly released transcripts of her House Jan. 6 committee depositions.\n\"The Presidential Records Act only asks that you keep the original copy of a document. So, yes,\" Hutchinson said when asked if she saw Meadows use the fireplace to burn documents.\n\"I know maybe three or four times - between two and four times, he had Mr. Perry in his office right before,\" Hutchinson told the committee, although she cautioned that she did not know what documents were burned.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Hutchinson^#1 Meadows^#2 burn^#3 document^#4 fireplace^#5",
">\n\nMerrick, you're up dude, jesus.",
">\n\nabdicated to jack smith to maintain independence so that the criminal process itself cannot be attacked to avoid justice.",
">\n\nthat was locker room destruction of government property. also trump has complete immunity. ALSO (somehow) he did nothing wrong.",
">\n\nI would assume that any document given to Mark Meadows was printed off and must be on a hard drive somewhere right? It's not the olden days when records were stored only on paper. So why was MM burning them?",
">\n\nHandwritten memos, received old school faxes, typewritten single copies. \nAlthough I did buy a used fax machine years ago that came from a gov’t office and stored on the carbon roll were months of a provincial cabinet minister’s outgoing communications.",
">\n\nShe’s very brave and I hope she can continue speaking truth to this national embarrassment",
">\n\nThis seems rather early 20th century don't you think? Republicans......ever behind the times. LOL.",
">\n\nTruly the Internet Explorer of political parties.",
">\n\nThe political party of AOL dialup.",
">\n\nBrought to you by Carl’s Jr.",
">\n\nWelcome to Costco, I love you",
">\n\nArrest the shitstain and his boss already DOJ.",
">\n\nSo no one is going to prison for this presidential crime spree? Really??",
">\n\nFun little felony.",
">\n\nPence only did the right thing because after talking to his lawyers, he realized he would be on legal trouble. He only did it for his own a**",
">\n\nAND after talking with Dan Quayle, checking if there was anything Pence could legally do to stop the certification.",
">\n\nBut what about Hillary’s emails ?",
">\n\nShe was the one who basically lied about the limo issue, right?\nJust checking.",
">\n\nWho else does stuff like this? Wait... I know... Don't tell me...\nOh! The Nazis! They did stuff like this.",
">\n\nArrest him?",
">\n\nThat whole “her email” and “her server” was literally a distraction.",
">\n\nWow. I can’t wait for something to be done about this. /s",
">\n\nThis is not at all surprising. Piece of shit doing piece of shit things.",
">\n\nMeadows was part of the planners for the J6 riots. He better start cooperating before he is sentenced to decades in prison.",
">\n\nWhen do we start injecting these crooks with Sodium Pentothal?",
">\n\nPut Meadows in jail already",
">\n\nNohing will happen.",
">\n\nCool, can't wait for the DOJ to continue to do nothing."
] |
>
Oh I’m sure they’re still on somebody’s hard-drive or email server somewhere. Burning docs doesn’t clear things up in today’s world.
|
[
"It's only clear if one can prove they were originals, not copies. I'm all for holding them accountable but you toss the baby out with the bath water. Be rational and logical.",
">\n\nI’m sure they brunt copies because that’s what you do with incriminating evidence copy it and burn the copies. Jesus man.",
">\n\nI'm just saying... rationally speaking, if you can't prove they were original documents, you cannot jump straight to \"yep that's it, hang em\". Are the odds good that they were originals? I'd say yes, but you have to prove it.",
">\n\nHe was a participant in a criminal conspiracy and he burned documents I would vote to convict.",
">\n\nWithout evidence? What you mentioned is circumstantial. If you're willing to convict someone of a specific crime without specific evidence to back it up, you're no better than they are. You would be acting on emotion and bias rather than evidence and proof. This is how lots of people end up locked up who are actually innocent of the crime in question because they are judged based on other behavior. That is not justice served.",
">\n\nIf you provably conspired to murder someone provably and we find human blood stains on your rug its ok to consider it further proof of the same crime we already proved. \nThere is ample evidence of the criminal conspiracy. There is no motivation in any possible universe where someone guilty of criminal conspiracy burns government documents and we believe that the governments were copies.\nPlease note the word reasonable in reasonable doubt.",
">\n\n\nprovably\n\nTherein lies the problem",
">\n\nWe have ample evidence of conspiracy to subvert democracy",
">\n\nThat's not what's being discussed. We're talking about Meadows burning documents.",
">\n\nLock him up.",
">\n\nMake sure he gets a prison cell with a low flow toilet. Those things piss him off",
">\n\nGuys can't even courtesy flush because by the time they finally get that beefroll down the hatch, it's too late--the stink is everywhere by then. Not me, of course. But Bubba, next cell over--hooWEE! Let me tell you folks, it's true. This is America, can you believe it? Maybe it's fine in Gynna. Their poops are smaller, I guess. Short little people over there. Little people, little poops. And I don't like how you have to pull down the jumpsuit to drop a deuce, either. Everyone says I wear it well, though--the warden, the CO's. No one has ever looked more presidential in a jumpsuit, they say.",
">\n\nThis women deserves the credit mike pence is getting",
">\n\nIt’s really annoying that Mike Pence keeps getting any credit for anything. He showed he had a spine on the one day it matters, and then keeps trying to play the “we just need to put this behind us and focus on the “real”* issues”. Again, Mike Pence did the only thing that mattered of him on Jan 6, good. I’m glad he was there and did that.\nIt doesnt make him a good person. It doesnt make him smart. And without verbally attacking the person who sent a far right mob to kill him, he is fine with his life being put in danger for “owning the libs”. What a spineless piece of shit.\n*real meaning anything I can make up that forces democrats to react to, and usually it has nothing to do with true policy.",
">\n\nEh, you guys are just struggling to give credit where credit is due because of the R next to his name and disagreements on previous policies. Call a spade a spade, the man made a hard decision for the moment and he should be honored for it just like those that voted not to impeach Andrew Johnson in the 1860s and others that came before us who stood to keep our country hole.",
">\n\nIt’s honestly a question of if you think certifying votes should qualify as job done. I’d argue that when you see, firsthand, a fundamental threat to our democracy as the second in command you are duty bound to do more than turn the page.",
">\n\nI agree completely. I’d just like to push back that it’s a lot easier to say this on a Reddit thread than with 60,000 people screaming hang Mike Pence on your front door from constructed gallows. Anyone who says he doesn’t deserve credit is doing so because they are unable to come down from their tower.",
">\n\nThe problem with giving Pence too much credit is that it glosses over the fact that, prior to January 6th, Pence was trying really hard to do what Trump wanted. He was looking for any legal justification to not certify the election and was even entertaining the idea without one.\nIt's like giving someone a pat on the back for finally doing the right thing after they knowingly did the wrong thing.\nIn addition, that moment of courage by Pence gets completely washed away by his intransigence to comply with the investigation. All he cares about is his political ambitions.",
">\n\nMaybe so. But history will be written with Pence as a hero and that’s okay with me.",
">\n\nAnd cassidy Hutchinson should be. My original point. Yea, his co pilot through this entire shit show is a hero for doing his job. I don't feel bad for the situation they got themselves into. There were more than enough warning signs leading allll the way up to this day.",
">\n\nWelp... That's obstruction / destruction of evidence.",
">\n\nFor all the security cameras in public places you'd think we'd also have them for public offices.",
">\n\nThe difference is the people making those decisions are in the offices.",
">\n\nIt's probably more effective than flushing them.",
">\n\nOr eating them",
">\n\nOr stealing them.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 65%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nFormer Trump White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson indicated Mark Meadows, the White House chief of staff, burned documents in his fireplace roughly a dozen times in the final weeks of the administration, according to newly released transcripts of her House Jan. 6 committee depositions.\n\"The Presidential Records Act only asks that you keep the original copy of a document. So, yes,\" Hutchinson said when asked if she saw Meadows use the fireplace to burn documents.\n\"I know maybe three or four times - between two and four times, he had Mr. Perry in his office right before,\" Hutchinson told the committee, although she cautioned that she did not know what documents were burned.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Hutchinson^#1 Meadows^#2 burn^#3 document^#4 fireplace^#5",
">\n\nMerrick, you're up dude, jesus.",
">\n\nabdicated to jack smith to maintain independence so that the criminal process itself cannot be attacked to avoid justice.",
">\n\nthat was locker room destruction of government property. also trump has complete immunity. ALSO (somehow) he did nothing wrong.",
">\n\nI would assume that any document given to Mark Meadows was printed off and must be on a hard drive somewhere right? It's not the olden days when records were stored only on paper. So why was MM burning them?",
">\n\nHandwritten memos, received old school faxes, typewritten single copies. \nAlthough I did buy a used fax machine years ago that came from a gov’t office and stored on the carbon roll were months of a provincial cabinet minister’s outgoing communications.",
">\n\nShe’s very brave and I hope she can continue speaking truth to this national embarrassment",
">\n\nThis seems rather early 20th century don't you think? Republicans......ever behind the times. LOL.",
">\n\nTruly the Internet Explorer of political parties.",
">\n\nThe political party of AOL dialup.",
">\n\nBrought to you by Carl’s Jr.",
">\n\nWelcome to Costco, I love you",
">\n\nArrest the shitstain and his boss already DOJ.",
">\n\nSo no one is going to prison for this presidential crime spree? Really??",
">\n\nFun little felony.",
">\n\nPence only did the right thing because after talking to his lawyers, he realized he would be on legal trouble. He only did it for his own a**",
">\n\nAND after talking with Dan Quayle, checking if there was anything Pence could legally do to stop the certification.",
">\n\nBut what about Hillary’s emails ?",
">\n\nShe was the one who basically lied about the limo issue, right?\nJust checking.",
">\n\nWho else does stuff like this? Wait... I know... Don't tell me...\nOh! The Nazis! They did stuff like this.",
">\n\nArrest him?",
">\n\nThat whole “her email” and “her server” was literally a distraction.",
">\n\nWow. I can’t wait for something to be done about this. /s",
">\n\nThis is not at all surprising. Piece of shit doing piece of shit things.",
">\n\nMeadows was part of the planners for the J6 riots. He better start cooperating before he is sentenced to decades in prison.",
">\n\nWhen do we start injecting these crooks with Sodium Pentothal?",
">\n\nPut Meadows in jail already",
">\n\nNohing will happen.",
">\n\nCool, can't wait for the DOJ to continue to do nothing.",
">\n\nPence should have been a Leader and not a Denier, if he had half the spine Cassy has, he would be the leading 2024 GOP nominee!!!"
] |
>
There’s no evidence. It’s just her statement. She could be saying all these things bc she don’t like trump like most of you. Ya was okay with twitter censorship. Maybe Twitter ceo with most of its employees should be in jail for censoring and interfering in the election.
|
[
"It's only clear if one can prove they were originals, not copies. I'm all for holding them accountable but you toss the baby out with the bath water. Be rational and logical.",
">\n\nI’m sure they brunt copies because that’s what you do with incriminating evidence copy it and burn the copies. Jesus man.",
">\n\nI'm just saying... rationally speaking, if you can't prove they were original documents, you cannot jump straight to \"yep that's it, hang em\". Are the odds good that they were originals? I'd say yes, but you have to prove it.",
">\n\nHe was a participant in a criminal conspiracy and he burned documents I would vote to convict.",
">\n\nWithout evidence? What you mentioned is circumstantial. If you're willing to convict someone of a specific crime without specific evidence to back it up, you're no better than they are. You would be acting on emotion and bias rather than evidence and proof. This is how lots of people end up locked up who are actually innocent of the crime in question because they are judged based on other behavior. That is not justice served.",
">\n\nIf you provably conspired to murder someone provably and we find human blood stains on your rug its ok to consider it further proof of the same crime we already proved. \nThere is ample evidence of the criminal conspiracy. There is no motivation in any possible universe where someone guilty of criminal conspiracy burns government documents and we believe that the governments were copies.\nPlease note the word reasonable in reasonable doubt.",
">\n\n\nprovably\n\nTherein lies the problem",
">\n\nWe have ample evidence of conspiracy to subvert democracy",
">\n\nThat's not what's being discussed. We're talking about Meadows burning documents.",
">\n\nLock him up.",
">\n\nMake sure he gets a prison cell with a low flow toilet. Those things piss him off",
">\n\nGuys can't even courtesy flush because by the time they finally get that beefroll down the hatch, it's too late--the stink is everywhere by then. Not me, of course. But Bubba, next cell over--hooWEE! Let me tell you folks, it's true. This is America, can you believe it? Maybe it's fine in Gynna. Their poops are smaller, I guess. Short little people over there. Little people, little poops. And I don't like how you have to pull down the jumpsuit to drop a deuce, either. Everyone says I wear it well, though--the warden, the CO's. No one has ever looked more presidential in a jumpsuit, they say.",
">\n\nThis women deserves the credit mike pence is getting",
">\n\nIt’s really annoying that Mike Pence keeps getting any credit for anything. He showed he had a spine on the one day it matters, and then keeps trying to play the “we just need to put this behind us and focus on the “real”* issues”. Again, Mike Pence did the only thing that mattered of him on Jan 6, good. I’m glad he was there and did that.\nIt doesnt make him a good person. It doesnt make him smart. And without verbally attacking the person who sent a far right mob to kill him, he is fine with his life being put in danger for “owning the libs”. What a spineless piece of shit.\n*real meaning anything I can make up that forces democrats to react to, and usually it has nothing to do with true policy.",
">\n\nEh, you guys are just struggling to give credit where credit is due because of the R next to his name and disagreements on previous policies. Call a spade a spade, the man made a hard decision for the moment and he should be honored for it just like those that voted not to impeach Andrew Johnson in the 1860s and others that came before us who stood to keep our country hole.",
">\n\nIt’s honestly a question of if you think certifying votes should qualify as job done. I’d argue that when you see, firsthand, a fundamental threat to our democracy as the second in command you are duty bound to do more than turn the page.",
">\n\nI agree completely. I’d just like to push back that it’s a lot easier to say this on a Reddit thread than with 60,000 people screaming hang Mike Pence on your front door from constructed gallows. Anyone who says he doesn’t deserve credit is doing so because they are unable to come down from their tower.",
">\n\nThe problem with giving Pence too much credit is that it glosses over the fact that, prior to January 6th, Pence was trying really hard to do what Trump wanted. He was looking for any legal justification to not certify the election and was even entertaining the idea without one.\nIt's like giving someone a pat on the back for finally doing the right thing after they knowingly did the wrong thing.\nIn addition, that moment of courage by Pence gets completely washed away by his intransigence to comply with the investigation. All he cares about is his political ambitions.",
">\n\nMaybe so. But history will be written with Pence as a hero and that’s okay with me.",
">\n\nAnd cassidy Hutchinson should be. My original point. Yea, his co pilot through this entire shit show is a hero for doing his job. I don't feel bad for the situation they got themselves into. There were more than enough warning signs leading allll the way up to this day.",
">\n\nWelp... That's obstruction / destruction of evidence.",
">\n\nFor all the security cameras in public places you'd think we'd also have them for public offices.",
">\n\nThe difference is the people making those decisions are in the offices.",
">\n\nIt's probably more effective than flushing them.",
">\n\nOr eating them",
">\n\nOr stealing them.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 65%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nFormer Trump White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson indicated Mark Meadows, the White House chief of staff, burned documents in his fireplace roughly a dozen times in the final weeks of the administration, according to newly released transcripts of her House Jan. 6 committee depositions.\n\"The Presidential Records Act only asks that you keep the original copy of a document. So, yes,\" Hutchinson said when asked if she saw Meadows use the fireplace to burn documents.\n\"I know maybe three or four times - between two and four times, he had Mr. Perry in his office right before,\" Hutchinson told the committee, although she cautioned that she did not know what documents were burned.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Hutchinson^#1 Meadows^#2 burn^#3 document^#4 fireplace^#5",
">\n\nMerrick, you're up dude, jesus.",
">\n\nabdicated to jack smith to maintain independence so that the criminal process itself cannot be attacked to avoid justice.",
">\n\nthat was locker room destruction of government property. also trump has complete immunity. ALSO (somehow) he did nothing wrong.",
">\n\nI would assume that any document given to Mark Meadows was printed off and must be on a hard drive somewhere right? It's not the olden days when records were stored only on paper. So why was MM burning them?",
">\n\nHandwritten memos, received old school faxes, typewritten single copies. \nAlthough I did buy a used fax machine years ago that came from a gov’t office and stored on the carbon roll were months of a provincial cabinet minister’s outgoing communications.",
">\n\nShe’s very brave and I hope she can continue speaking truth to this national embarrassment",
">\n\nThis seems rather early 20th century don't you think? Republicans......ever behind the times. LOL.",
">\n\nTruly the Internet Explorer of political parties.",
">\n\nThe political party of AOL dialup.",
">\n\nBrought to you by Carl’s Jr.",
">\n\nWelcome to Costco, I love you",
">\n\nArrest the shitstain and his boss already DOJ.",
">\n\nSo no one is going to prison for this presidential crime spree? Really??",
">\n\nFun little felony.",
">\n\nPence only did the right thing because after talking to his lawyers, he realized he would be on legal trouble. He only did it for his own a**",
">\n\nAND after talking with Dan Quayle, checking if there was anything Pence could legally do to stop the certification.",
">\n\nBut what about Hillary’s emails ?",
">\n\nShe was the one who basically lied about the limo issue, right?\nJust checking.",
">\n\nWho else does stuff like this? Wait... I know... Don't tell me...\nOh! The Nazis! They did stuff like this.",
">\n\nArrest him?",
">\n\nThat whole “her email” and “her server” was literally a distraction.",
">\n\nWow. I can’t wait for something to be done about this. /s",
">\n\nThis is not at all surprising. Piece of shit doing piece of shit things.",
">\n\nMeadows was part of the planners for the J6 riots. He better start cooperating before he is sentenced to decades in prison.",
">\n\nWhen do we start injecting these crooks with Sodium Pentothal?",
">\n\nPut Meadows in jail already",
">\n\nNohing will happen.",
">\n\nCool, can't wait for the DOJ to continue to do nothing.",
">\n\nPence should have been a Leader and not a Denier, if he had half the spine Cassy has, he would be the leading 2024 GOP nominee!!!",
">\n\nOh I’m sure they’re still on somebody’s hard-drive or email server somewhere. Burning docs doesn’t clear things up in today’s world."
] |
>
Oh no. The guy who helped plan a coup burned some documents. Whatever will we do.
|
[
"It's only clear if one can prove they were originals, not copies. I'm all for holding them accountable but you toss the baby out with the bath water. Be rational and logical.",
">\n\nI’m sure they brunt copies because that’s what you do with incriminating evidence copy it and burn the copies. Jesus man.",
">\n\nI'm just saying... rationally speaking, if you can't prove they were original documents, you cannot jump straight to \"yep that's it, hang em\". Are the odds good that they were originals? I'd say yes, but you have to prove it.",
">\n\nHe was a participant in a criminal conspiracy and he burned documents I would vote to convict.",
">\n\nWithout evidence? What you mentioned is circumstantial. If you're willing to convict someone of a specific crime without specific evidence to back it up, you're no better than they are. You would be acting on emotion and bias rather than evidence and proof. This is how lots of people end up locked up who are actually innocent of the crime in question because they are judged based on other behavior. That is not justice served.",
">\n\nIf you provably conspired to murder someone provably and we find human blood stains on your rug its ok to consider it further proof of the same crime we already proved. \nThere is ample evidence of the criminal conspiracy. There is no motivation in any possible universe where someone guilty of criminal conspiracy burns government documents and we believe that the governments were copies.\nPlease note the word reasonable in reasonable doubt.",
">\n\n\nprovably\n\nTherein lies the problem",
">\n\nWe have ample evidence of conspiracy to subvert democracy",
">\n\nThat's not what's being discussed. We're talking about Meadows burning documents.",
">\n\nLock him up.",
">\n\nMake sure he gets a prison cell with a low flow toilet. Those things piss him off",
">\n\nGuys can't even courtesy flush because by the time they finally get that beefroll down the hatch, it's too late--the stink is everywhere by then. Not me, of course. But Bubba, next cell over--hooWEE! Let me tell you folks, it's true. This is America, can you believe it? Maybe it's fine in Gynna. Their poops are smaller, I guess. Short little people over there. Little people, little poops. And I don't like how you have to pull down the jumpsuit to drop a deuce, either. Everyone says I wear it well, though--the warden, the CO's. No one has ever looked more presidential in a jumpsuit, they say.",
">\n\nThis women deserves the credit mike pence is getting",
">\n\nIt’s really annoying that Mike Pence keeps getting any credit for anything. He showed he had a spine on the one day it matters, and then keeps trying to play the “we just need to put this behind us and focus on the “real”* issues”. Again, Mike Pence did the only thing that mattered of him on Jan 6, good. I’m glad he was there and did that.\nIt doesnt make him a good person. It doesnt make him smart. And without verbally attacking the person who sent a far right mob to kill him, he is fine with his life being put in danger for “owning the libs”. What a spineless piece of shit.\n*real meaning anything I can make up that forces democrats to react to, and usually it has nothing to do with true policy.",
">\n\nEh, you guys are just struggling to give credit where credit is due because of the R next to his name and disagreements on previous policies. Call a spade a spade, the man made a hard decision for the moment and he should be honored for it just like those that voted not to impeach Andrew Johnson in the 1860s and others that came before us who stood to keep our country hole.",
">\n\nIt’s honestly a question of if you think certifying votes should qualify as job done. I’d argue that when you see, firsthand, a fundamental threat to our democracy as the second in command you are duty bound to do more than turn the page.",
">\n\nI agree completely. I’d just like to push back that it’s a lot easier to say this on a Reddit thread than with 60,000 people screaming hang Mike Pence on your front door from constructed gallows. Anyone who says he doesn’t deserve credit is doing so because they are unable to come down from their tower.",
">\n\nThe problem with giving Pence too much credit is that it glosses over the fact that, prior to January 6th, Pence was trying really hard to do what Trump wanted. He was looking for any legal justification to not certify the election and was even entertaining the idea without one.\nIt's like giving someone a pat on the back for finally doing the right thing after they knowingly did the wrong thing.\nIn addition, that moment of courage by Pence gets completely washed away by his intransigence to comply with the investigation. All he cares about is his political ambitions.",
">\n\nMaybe so. But history will be written with Pence as a hero and that’s okay with me.",
">\n\nAnd cassidy Hutchinson should be. My original point. Yea, his co pilot through this entire shit show is a hero for doing his job. I don't feel bad for the situation they got themselves into. There were more than enough warning signs leading allll the way up to this day.",
">\n\nWelp... That's obstruction / destruction of evidence.",
">\n\nFor all the security cameras in public places you'd think we'd also have them for public offices.",
">\n\nThe difference is the people making those decisions are in the offices.",
">\n\nIt's probably more effective than flushing them.",
">\n\nOr eating them",
">\n\nOr stealing them.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 65%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nFormer Trump White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson indicated Mark Meadows, the White House chief of staff, burned documents in his fireplace roughly a dozen times in the final weeks of the administration, according to newly released transcripts of her House Jan. 6 committee depositions.\n\"The Presidential Records Act only asks that you keep the original copy of a document. So, yes,\" Hutchinson said when asked if she saw Meadows use the fireplace to burn documents.\n\"I know maybe three or four times - between two and four times, he had Mr. Perry in his office right before,\" Hutchinson told the committee, although she cautioned that she did not know what documents were burned.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Hutchinson^#1 Meadows^#2 burn^#3 document^#4 fireplace^#5",
">\n\nMerrick, you're up dude, jesus.",
">\n\nabdicated to jack smith to maintain independence so that the criminal process itself cannot be attacked to avoid justice.",
">\n\nthat was locker room destruction of government property. also trump has complete immunity. ALSO (somehow) he did nothing wrong.",
">\n\nI would assume that any document given to Mark Meadows was printed off and must be on a hard drive somewhere right? It's not the olden days when records were stored only on paper. So why was MM burning them?",
">\n\nHandwritten memos, received old school faxes, typewritten single copies. \nAlthough I did buy a used fax machine years ago that came from a gov’t office and stored on the carbon roll were months of a provincial cabinet minister’s outgoing communications.",
">\n\nShe’s very brave and I hope she can continue speaking truth to this national embarrassment",
">\n\nThis seems rather early 20th century don't you think? Republicans......ever behind the times. LOL.",
">\n\nTruly the Internet Explorer of political parties.",
">\n\nThe political party of AOL dialup.",
">\n\nBrought to you by Carl’s Jr.",
">\n\nWelcome to Costco, I love you",
">\n\nArrest the shitstain and his boss already DOJ.",
">\n\nSo no one is going to prison for this presidential crime spree? Really??",
">\n\nFun little felony.",
">\n\nPence only did the right thing because after talking to his lawyers, he realized he would be on legal trouble. He only did it for his own a**",
">\n\nAND after talking with Dan Quayle, checking if there was anything Pence could legally do to stop the certification.",
">\n\nBut what about Hillary’s emails ?",
">\n\nShe was the one who basically lied about the limo issue, right?\nJust checking.",
">\n\nWho else does stuff like this? Wait... I know... Don't tell me...\nOh! The Nazis! They did stuff like this.",
">\n\nArrest him?",
">\n\nThat whole “her email” and “her server” was literally a distraction.",
">\n\nWow. I can’t wait for something to be done about this. /s",
">\n\nThis is not at all surprising. Piece of shit doing piece of shit things.",
">\n\nMeadows was part of the planners for the J6 riots. He better start cooperating before he is sentenced to decades in prison.",
">\n\nWhen do we start injecting these crooks with Sodium Pentothal?",
">\n\nPut Meadows in jail already",
">\n\nNohing will happen.",
">\n\nCool, can't wait for the DOJ to continue to do nothing.",
">\n\nPence should have been a Leader and not a Denier, if he had half the spine Cassy has, he would be the leading 2024 GOP nominee!!!",
">\n\nOh I’m sure they’re still on somebody’s hard-drive or email server somewhere. Burning docs doesn’t clear things up in today’s world.",
">\n\nThere’s no evidence. It’s just her statement. She could be saying all these things bc she don’t like trump like most of you. Ya was okay with twitter censorship. Maybe Twitter ceo with most of its employees should be in jail for censoring and interfering in the election."
] |
>
is this the same lady that saying what happened in the limo but wasnt even in the limo?
|
[
"It's only clear if one can prove they were originals, not copies. I'm all for holding them accountable but you toss the baby out with the bath water. Be rational and logical.",
">\n\nI’m sure they brunt copies because that’s what you do with incriminating evidence copy it and burn the copies. Jesus man.",
">\n\nI'm just saying... rationally speaking, if you can't prove they were original documents, you cannot jump straight to \"yep that's it, hang em\". Are the odds good that they were originals? I'd say yes, but you have to prove it.",
">\n\nHe was a participant in a criminal conspiracy and he burned documents I would vote to convict.",
">\n\nWithout evidence? What you mentioned is circumstantial. If you're willing to convict someone of a specific crime without specific evidence to back it up, you're no better than they are. You would be acting on emotion and bias rather than evidence and proof. This is how lots of people end up locked up who are actually innocent of the crime in question because they are judged based on other behavior. That is not justice served.",
">\n\nIf you provably conspired to murder someone provably and we find human blood stains on your rug its ok to consider it further proof of the same crime we already proved. \nThere is ample evidence of the criminal conspiracy. There is no motivation in any possible universe where someone guilty of criminal conspiracy burns government documents and we believe that the governments were copies.\nPlease note the word reasonable in reasonable doubt.",
">\n\n\nprovably\n\nTherein lies the problem",
">\n\nWe have ample evidence of conspiracy to subvert democracy",
">\n\nThat's not what's being discussed. We're talking about Meadows burning documents.",
">\n\nLock him up.",
">\n\nMake sure he gets a prison cell with a low flow toilet. Those things piss him off",
">\n\nGuys can't even courtesy flush because by the time they finally get that beefroll down the hatch, it's too late--the stink is everywhere by then. Not me, of course. But Bubba, next cell over--hooWEE! Let me tell you folks, it's true. This is America, can you believe it? Maybe it's fine in Gynna. Their poops are smaller, I guess. Short little people over there. Little people, little poops. And I don't like how you have to pull down the jumpsuit to drop a deuce, either. Everyone says I wear it well, though--the warden, the CO's. No one has ever looked more presidential in a jumpsuit, they say.",
">\n\nThis women deserves the credit mike pence is getting",
">\n\nIt’s really annoying that Mike Pence keeps getting any credit for anything. He showed he had a spine on the one day it matters, and then keeps trying to play the “we just need to put this behind us and focus on the “real”* issues”. Again, Mike Pence did the only thing that mattered of him on Jan 6, good. I’m glad he was there and did that.\nIt doesnt make him a good person. It doesnt make him smart. And without verbally attacking the person who sent a far right mob to kill him, he is fine with his life being put in danger for “owning the libs”. What a spineless piece of shit.\n*real meaning anything I can make up that forces democrats to react to, and usually it has nothing to do with true policy.",
">\n\nEh, you guys are just struggling to give credit where credit is due because of the R next to his name and disagreements on previous policies. Call a spade a spade, the man made a hard decision for the moment and he should be honored for it just like those that voted not to impeach Andrew Johnson in the 1860s and others that came before us who stood to keep our country hole.",
">\n\nIt’s honestly a question of if you think certifying votes should qualify as job done. I’d argue that when you see, firsthand, a fundamental threat to our democracy as the second in command you are duty bound to do more than turn the page.",
">\n\nI agree completely. I’d just like to push back that it’s a lot easier to say this on a Reddit thread than with 60,000 people screaming hang Mike Pence on your front door from constructed gallows. Anyone who says he doesn’t deserve credit is doing so because they are unable to come down from their tower.",
">\n\nThe problem with giving Pence too much credit is that it glosses over the fact that, prior to January 6th, Pence was trying really hard to do what Trump wanted. He was looking for any legal justification to not certify the election and was even entertaining the idea without one.\nIt's like giving someone a pat on the back for finally doing the right thing after they knowingly did the wrong thing.\nIn addition, that moment of courage by Pence gets completely washed away by his intransigence to comply with the investigation. All he cares about is his political ambitions.",
">\n\nMaybe so. But history will be written with Pence as a hero and that’s okay with me.",
">\n\nAnd cassidy Hutchinson should be. My original point. Yea, his co pilot through this entire shit show is a hero for doing his job. I don't feel bad for the situation they got themselves into. There were more than enough warning signs leading allll the way up to this day.",
">\n\nWelp... That's obstruction / destruction of evidence.",
">\n\nFor all the security cameras in public places you'd think we'd also have them for public offices.",
">\n\nThe difference is the people making those decisions are in the offices.",
">\n\nIt's probably more effective than flushing them.",
">\n\nOr eating them",
">\n\nOr stealing them.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 65%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nFormer Trump White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson indicated Mark Meadows, the White House chief of staff, burned documents in his fireplace roughly a dozen times in the final weeks of the administration, according to newly released transcripts of her House Jan. 6 committee depositions.\n\"The Presidential Records Act only asks that you keep the original copy of a document. So, yes,\" Hutchinson said when asked if she saw Meadows use the fireplace to burn documents.\n\"I know maybe three or four times - between two and four times, he had Mr. Perry in his office right before,\" Hutchinson told the committee, although she cautioned that she did not know what documents were burned.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Hutchinson^#1 Meadows^#2 burn^#3 document^#4 fireplace^#5",
">\n\nMerrick, you're up dude, jesus.",
">\n\nabdicated to jack smith to maintain independence so that the criminal process itself cannot be attacked to avoid justice.",
">\n\nthat was locker room destruction of government property. also trump has complete immunity. ALSO (somehow) he did nothing wrong.",
">\n\nI would assume that any document given to Mark Meadows was printed off and must be on a hard drive somewhere right? It's not the olden days when records were stored only on paper. So why was MM burning them?",
">\n\nHandwritten memos, received old school faxes, typewritten single copies. \nAlthough I did buy a used fax machine years ago that came from a gov’t office and stored on the carbon roll were months of a provincial cabinet minister’s outgoing communications.",
">\n\nShe’s very brave and I hope she can continue speaking truth to this national embarrassment",
">\n\nThis seems rather early 20th century don't you think? Republicans......ever behind the times. LOL.",
">\n\nTruly the Internet Explorer of political parties.",
">\n\nThe political party of AOL dialup.",
">\n\nBrought to you by Carl’s Jr.",
">\n\nWelcome to Costco, I love you",
">\n\nArrest the shitstain and his boss already DOJ.",
">\n\nSo no one is going to prison for this presidential crime spree? Really??",
">\n\nFun little felony.",
">\n\nPence only did the right thing because after talking to his lawyers, he realized he would be on legal trouble. He only did it for his own a**",
">\n\nAND after talking with Dan Quayle, checking if there was anything Pence could legally do to stop the certification.",
">\n\nBut what about Hillary’s emails ?",
">\n\nShe was the one who basically lied about the limo issue, right?\nJust checking.",
">\n\nWho else does stuff like this? Wait... I know... Don't tell me...\nOh! The Nazis! They did stuff like this.",
">\n\nArrest him?",
">\n\nThat whole “her email” and “her server” was literally a distraction.",
">\n\nWow. I can’t wait for something to be done about this. /s",
">\n\nThis is not at all surprising. Piece of shit doing piece of shit things.",
">\n\nMeadows was part of the planners for the J6 riots. He better start cooperating before he is sentenced to decades in prison.",
">\n\nWhen do we start injecting these crooks with Sodium Pentothal?",
">\n\nPut Meadows in jail already",
">\n\nNohing will happen.",
">\n\nCool, can't wait for the DOJ to continue to do nothing.",
">\n\nPence should have been a Leader and not a Denier, if he had half the spine Cassy has, he would be the leading 2024 GOP nominee!!!",
">\n\nOh I’m sure they’re still on somebody’s hard-drive or email server somewhere. Burning docs doesn’t clear things up in today’s world.",
">\n\nThere’s no evidence. It’s just her statement. She could be saying all these things bc she don’t like trump like most of you. Ya was okay with twitter censorship. Maybe Twitter ceo with most of its employees should be in jail for censoring and interfering in the election.",
">\n\nOh no. The guy who helped plan a coup burned some documents. Whatever will we do."
] |
>
If it turns out to be true, its bad and there should be consequences though - right?
|
[
"It's only clear if one can prove they were originals, not copies. I'm all for holding them accountable but you toss the baby out with the bath water. Be rational and logical.",
">\n\nI’m sure they brunt copies because that’s what you do with incriminating evidence copy it and burn the copies. Jesus man.",
">\n\nI'm just saying... rationally speaking, if you can't prove they were original documents, you cannot jump straight to \"yep that's it, hang em\". Are the odds good that they were originals? I'd say yes, but you have to prove it.",
">\n\nHe was a participant in a criminal conspiracy and he burned documents I would vote to convict.",
">\n\nWithout evidence? What you mentioned is circumstantial. If you're willing to convict someone of a specific crime without specific evidence to back it up, you're no better than they are. You would be acting on emotion and bias rather than evidence and proof. This is how lots of people end up locked up who are actually innocent of the crime in question because they are judged based on other behavior. That is not justice served.",
">\n\nIf you provably conspired to murder someone provably and we find human blood stains on your rug its ok to consider it further proof of the same crime we already proved. \nThere is ample evidence of the criminal conspiracy. There is no motivation in any possible universe where someone guilty of criminal conspiracy burns government documents and we believe that the governments were copies.\nPlease note the word reasonable in reasonable doubt.",
">\n\n\nprovably\n\nTherein lies the problem",
">\n\nWe have ample evidence of conspiracy to subvert democracy",
">\n\nThat's not what's being discussed. We're talking about Meadows burning documents.",
">\n\nLock him up.",
">\n\nMake sure he gets a prison cell with a low flow toilet. Those things piss him off",
">\n\nGuys can't even courtesy flush because by the time they finally get that beefroll down the hatch, it's too late--the stink is everywhere by then. Not me, of course. But Bubba, next cell over--hooWEE! Let me tell you folks, it's true. This is America, can you believe it? Maybe it's fine in Gynna. Their poops are smaller, I guess. Short little people over there. Little people, little poops. And I don't like how you have to pull down the jumpsuit to drop a deuce, either. Everyone says I wear it well, though--the warden, the CO's. No one has ever looked more presidential in a jumpsuit, they say.",
">\n\nThis women deserves the credit mike pence is getting",
">\n\nIt’s really annoying that Mike Pence keeps getting any credit for anything. He showed he had a spine on the one day it matters, and then keeps trying to play the “we just need to put this behind us and focus on the “real”* issues”. Again, Mike Pence did the only thing that mattered of him on Jan 6, good. I’m glad he was there and did that.\nIt doesnt make him a good person. It doesnt make him smart. And without verbally attacking the person who sent a far right mob to kill him, he is fine with his life being put in danger for “owning the libs”. What a spineless piece of shit.\n*real meaning anything I can make up that forces democrats to react to, and usually it has nothing to do with true policy.",
">\n\nEh, you guys are just struggling to give credit where credit is due because of the R next to his name and disagreements on previous policies. Call a spade a spade, the man made a hard decision for the moment and he should be honored for it just like those that voted not to impeach Andrew Johnson in the 1860s and others that came before us who stood to keep our country hole.",
">\n\nIt’s honestly a question of if you think certifying votes should qualify as job done. I’d argue that when you see, firsthand, a fundamental threat to our democracy as the second in command you are duty bound to do more than turn the page.",
">\n\nI agree completely. I’d just like to push back that it’s a lot easier to say this on a Reddit thread than with 60,000 people screaming hang Mike Pence on your front door from constructed gallows. Anyone who says he doesn’t deserve credit is doing so because they are unable to come down from their tower.",
">\n\nThe problem with giving Pence too much credit is that it glosses over the fact that, prior to January 6th, Pence was trying really hard to do what Trump wanted. He was looking for any legal justification to not certify the election and was even entertaining the idea without one.\nIt's like giving someone a pat on the back for finally doing the right thing after they knowingly did the wrong thing.\nIn addition, that moment of courage by Pence gets completely washed away by his intransigence to comply with the investigation. All he cares about is his political ambitions.",
">\n\nMaybe so. But history will be written with Pence as a hero and that’s okay with me.",
">\n\nAnd cassidy Hutchinson should be. My original point. Yea, his co pilot through this entire shit show is a hero for doing his job. I don't feel bad for the situation they got themselves into. There were more than enough warning signs leading allll the way up to this day.",
">\n\nWelp... That's obstruction / destruction of evidence.",
">\n\nFor all the security cameras in public places you'd think we'd also have them for public offices.",
">\n\nThe difference is the people making those decisions are in the offices.",
">\n\nIt's probably more effective than flushing them.",
">\n\nOr eating them",
">\n\nOr stealing them.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 65%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nFormer Trump White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson indicated Mark Meadows, the White House chief of staff, burned documents in his fireplace roughly a dozen times in the final weeks of the administration, according to newly released transcripts of her House Jan. 6 committee depositions.\n\"The Presidential Records Act only asks that you keep the original copy of a document. So, yes,\" Hutchinson said when asked if she saw Meadows use the fireplace to burn documents.\n\"I know maybe three or four times - between two and four times, he had Mr. Perry in his office right before,\" Hutchinson told the committee, although she cautioned that she did not know what documents were burned.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Hutchinson^#1 Meadows^#2 burn^#3 document^#4 fireplace^#5",
">\n\nMerrick, you're up dude, jesus.",
">\n\nabdicated to jack smith to maintain independence so that the criminal process itself cannot be attacked to avoid justice.",
">\n\nthat was locker room destruction of government property. also trump has complete immunity. ALSO (somehow) he did nothing wrong.",
">\n\nI would assume that any document given to Mark Meadows was printed off and must be on a hard drive somewhere right? It's not the olden days when records were stored only on paper. So why was MM burning them?",
">\n\nHandwritten memos, received old school faxes, typewritten single copies. \nAlthough I did buy a used fax machine years ago that came from a gov’t office and stored on the carbon roll were months of a provincial cabinet minister’s outgoing communications.",
">\n\nShe’s very brave and I hope she can continue speaking truth to this national embarrassment",
">\n\nThis seems rather early 20th century don't you think? Republicans......ever behind the times. LOL.",
">\n\nTruly the Internet Explorer of political parties.",
">\n\nThe political party of AOL dialup.",
">\n\nBrought to you by Carl’s Jr.",
">\n\nWelcome to Costco, I love you",
">\n\nArrest the shitstain and his boss already DOJ.",
">\n\nSo no one is going to prison for this presidential crime spree? Really??",
">\n\nFun little felony.",
">\n\nPence only did the right thing because after talking to his lawyers, he realized he would be on legal trouble. He only did it for his own a**",
">\n\nAND after talking with Dan Quayle, checking if there was anything Pence could legally do to stop the certification.",
">\n\nBut what about Hillary’s emails ?",
">\n\nShe was the one who basically lied about the limo issue, right?\nJust checking.",
">\n\nWho else does stuff like this? Wait... I know... Don't tell me...\nOh! The Nazis! They did stuff like this.",
">\n\nArrest him?",
">\n\nThat whole “her email” and “her server” was literally a distraction.",
">\n\nWow. I can’t wait for something to be done about this. /s",
">\n\nThis is not at all surprising. Piece of shit doing piece of shit things.",
">\n\nMeadows was part of the planners for the J6 riots. He better start cooperating before he is sentenced to decades in prison.",
">\n\nWhen do we start injecting these crooks with Sodium Pentothal?",
">\n\nPut Meadows in jail already",
">\n\nNohing will happen.",
">\n\nCool, can't wait for the DOJ to continue to do nothing.",
">\n\nPence should have been a Leader and not a Denier, if he had half the spine Cassy has, he would be the leading 2024 GOP nominee!!!",
">\n\nOh I’m sure they’re still on somebody’s hard-drive or email server somewhere. Burning docs doesn’t clear things up in today’s world.",
">\n\nThere’s no evidence. It’s just her statement. She could be saying all these things bc she don’t like trump like most of you. Ya was okay with twitter censorship. Maybe Twitter ceo with most of its employees should be in jail for censoring and interfering in the election.",
">\n\nOh no. The guy who helped plan a coup burned some documents. Whatever will we do.",
">\n\nis this the same lady that saying what happened in the limo but wasnt even in the limo?"
] |
>
“once they turned his office fireplace in December 2020”
Does anyone copy edit this stuff? What the hell is this supposed to mean?
|
[
"It's only clear if one can prove they were originals, not copies. I'm all for holding them accountable but you toss the baby out with the bath water. Be rational and logical.",
">\n\nI’m sure they brunt copies because that’s what you do with incriminating evidence copy it and burn the copies. Jesus man.",
">\n\nI'm just saying... rationally speaking, if you can't prove they were original documents, you cannot jump straight to \"yep that's it, hang em\". Are the odds good that they were originals? I'd say yes, but you have to prove it.",
">\n\nHe was a participant in a criminal conspiracy and he burned documents I would vote to convict.",
">\n\nWithout evidence? What you mentioned is circumstantial. If you're willing to convict someone of a specific crime without specific evidence to back it up, you're no better than they are. You would be acting on emotion and bias rather than evidence and proof. This is how lots of people end up locked up who are actually innocent of the crime in question because they are judged based on other behavior. That is not justice served.",
">\n\nIf you provably conspired to murder someone provably and we find human blood stains on your rug its ok to consider it further proof of the same crime we already proved. \nThere is ample evidence of the criminal conspiracy. There is no motivation in any possible universe where someone guilty of criminal conspiracy burns government documents and we believe that the governments were copies.\nPlease note the word reasonable in reasonable doubt.",
">\n\n\nprovably\n\nTherein lies the problem",
">\n\nWe have ample evidence of conspiracy to subvert democracy",
">\n\nThat's not what's being discussed. We're talking about Meadows burning documents.",
">\n\nLock him up.",
">\n\nMake sure he gets a prison cell with a low flow toilet. Those things piss him off",
">\n\nGuys can't even courtesy flush because by the time they finally get that beefroll down the hatch, it's too late--the stink is everywhere by then. Not me, of course. But Bubba, next cell over--hooWEE! Let me tell you folks, it's true. This is America, can you believe it? Maybe it's fine in Gynna. Their poops are smaller, I guess. Short little people over there. Little people, little poops. And I don't like how you have to pull down the jumpsuit to drop a deuce, either. Everyone says I wear it well, though--the warden, the CO's. No one has ever looked more presidential in a jumpsuit, they say.",
">\n\nThis women deserves the credit mike pence is getting",
">\n\nIt’s really annoying that Mike Pence keeps getting any credit for anything. He showed he had a spine on the one day it matters, and then keeps trying to play the “we just need to put this behind us and focus on the “real”* issues”. Again, Mike Pence did the only thing that mattered of him on Jan 6, good. I’m glad he was there and did that.\nIt doesnt make him a good person. It doesnt make him smart. And without verbally attacking the person who sent a far right mob to kill him, he is fine with his life being put in danger for “owning the libs”. What a spineless piece of shit.\n*real meaning anything I can make up that forces democrats to react to, and usually it has nothing to do with true policy.",
">\n\nEh, you guys are just struggling to give credit where credit is due because of the R next to his name and disagreements on previous policies. Call a spade a spade, the man made a hard decision for the moment and he should be honored for it just like those that voted not to impeach Andrew Johnson in the 1860s and others that came before us who stood to keep our country hole.",
">\n\nIt’s honestly a question of if you think certifying votes should qualify as job done. I’d argue that when you see, firsthand, a fundamental threat to our democracy as the second in command you are duty bound to do more than turn the page.",
">\n\nI agree completely. I’d just like to push back that it’s a lot easier to say this on a Reddit thread than with 60,000 people screaming hang Mike Pence on your front door from constructed gallows. Anyone who says he doesn’t deserve credit is doing so because they are unable to come down from their tower.",
">\n\nThe problem with giving Pence too much credit is that it glosses over the fact that, prior to January 6th, Pence was trying really hard to do what Trump wanted. He was looking for any legal justification to not certify the election and was even entertaining the idea without one.\nIt's like giving someone a pat on the back for finally doing the right thing after they knowingly did the wrong thing.\nIn addition, that moment of courage by Pence gets completely washed away by his intransigence to comply with the investigation. All he cares about is his political ambitions.",
">\n\nMaybe so. But history will be written with Pence as a hero and that’s okay with me.",
">\n\nAnd cassidy Hutchinson should be. My original point. Yea, his co pilot through this entire shit show is a hero for doing his job. I don't feel bad for the situation they got themselves into. There were more than enough warning signs leading allll the way up to this day.",
">\n\nWelp... That's obstruction / destruction of evidence.",
">\n\nFor all the security cameras in public places you'd think we'd also have them for public offices.",
">\n\nThe difference is the people making those decisions are in the offices.",
">\n\nIt's probably more effective than flushing them.",
">\n\nOr eating them",
">\n\nOr stealing them.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 65%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nFormer Trump White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson indicated Mark Meadows, the White House chief of staff, burned documents in his fireplace roughly a dozen times in the final weeks of the administration, according to newly released transcripts of her House Jan. 6 committee depositions.\n\"The Presidential Records Act only asks that you keep the original copy of a document. So, yes,\" Hutchinson said when asked if she saw Meadows use the fireplace to burn documents.\n\"I know maybe three or four times - between two and four times, he had Mr. Perry in his office right before,\" Hutchinson told the committee, although she cautioned that she did not know what documents were burned.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Hutchinson^#1 Meadows^#2 burn^#3 document^#4 fireplace^#5",
">\n\nMerrick, you're up dude, jesus.",
">\n\nabdicated to jack smith to maintain independence so that the criminal process itself cannot be attacked to avoid justice.",
">\n\nthat was locker room destruction of government property. also trump has complete immunity. ALSO (somehow) he did nothing wrong.",
">\n\nI would assume that any document given to Mark Meadows was printed off and must be on a hard drive somewhere right? It's not the olden days when records were stored only on paper. So why was MM burning them?",
">\n\nHandwritten memos, received old school faxes, typewritten single copies. \nAlthough I did buy a used fax machine years ago that came from a gov’t office and stored on the carbon roll were months of a provincial cabinet minister’s outgoing communications.",
">\n\nShe’s very brave and I hope she can continue speaking truth to this national embarrassment",
">\n\nThis seems rather early 20th century don't you think? Republicans......ever behind the times. LOL.",
">\n\nTruly the Internet Explorer of political parties.",
">\n\nThe political party of AOL dialup.",
">\n\nBrought to you by Carl’s Jr.",
">\n\nWelcome to Costco, I love you",
">\n\nArrest the shitstain and his boss already DOJ.",
">\n\nSo no one is going to prison for this presidential crime spree? Really??",
">\n\nFun little felony.",
">\n\nPence only did the right thing because after talking to his lawyers, he realized he would be on legal trouble. He only did it for his own a**",
">\n\nAND after talking with Dan Quayle, checking if there was anything Pence could legally do to stop the certification.",
">\n\nBut what about Hillary’s emails ?",
">\n\nShe was the one who basically lied about the limo issue, right?\nJust checking.",
">\n\nWho else does stuff like this? Wait... I know... Don't tell me...\nOh! The Nazis! They did stuff like this.",
">\n\nArrest him?",
">\n\nThat whole “her email” and “her server” was literally a distraction.",
">\n\nWow. I can’t wait for something to be done about this. /s",
">\n\nThis is not at all surprising. Piece of shit doing piece of shit things.",
">\n\nMeadows was part of the planners for the J6 riots. He better start cooperating before he is sentenced to decades in prison.",
">\n\nWhen do we start injecting these crooks with Sodium Pentothal?",
">\n\nPut Meadows in jail already",
">\n\nNohing will happen.",
">\n\nCool, can't wait for the DOJ to continue to do nothing.",
">\n\nPence should have been a Leader and not a Denier, if he had half the spine Cassy has, he would be the leading 2024 GOP nominee!!!",
">\n\nOh I’m sure they’re still on somebody’s hard-drive or email server somewhere. Burning docs doesn’t clear things up in today’s world.",
">\n\nThere’s no evidence. It’s just her statement. She could be saying all these things bc she don’t like trump like most of you. Ya was okay with twitter censorship. Maybe Twitter ceo with most of its employees should be in jail for censoring and interfering in the election.",
">\n\nOh no. The guy who helped plan a coup burned some documents. Whatever will we do.",
">\n\nis this the same lady that saying what happened in the limo but wasnt even in the limo?",
">\n\nIf it turns out to be true, its bad and there should be consequences though - right?"
] |
>
Cryin’ Mark Meadows
|
[
"It's only clear if one can prove they were originals, not copies. I'm all for holding them accountable but you toss the baby out with the bath water. Be rational and logical.",
">\n\nI’m sure they brunt copies because that’s what you do with incriminating evidence copy it and burn the copies. Jesus man.",
">\n\nI'm just saying... rationally speaking, if you can't prove they were original documents, you cannot jump straight to \"yep that's it, hang em\". Are the odds good that they were originals? I'd say yes, but you have to prove it.",
">\n\nHe was a participant in a criminal conspiracy and he burned documents I would vote to convict.",
">\n\nWithout evidence? What you mentioned is circumstantial. If you're willing to convict someone of a specific crime without specific evidence to back it up, you're no better than they are. You would be acting on emotion and bias rather than evidence and proof. This is how lots of people end up locked up who are actually innocent of the crime in question because they are judged based on other behavior. That is not justice served.",
">\n\nIf you provably conspired to murder someone provably and we find human blood stains on your rug its ok to consider it further proof of the same crime we already proved. \nThere is ample evidence of the criminal conspiracy. There is no motivation in any possible universe where someone guilty of criminal conspiracy burns government documents and we believe that the governments were copies.\nPlease note the word reasonable in reasonable doubt.",
">\n\n\nprovably\n\nTherein lies the problem",
">\n\nWe have ample evidence of conspiracy to subvert democracy",
">\n\nThat's not what's being discussed. We're talking about Meadows burning documents.",
">\n\nLock him up.",
">\n\nMake sure he gets a prison cell with a low flow toilet. Those things piss him off",
">\n\nGuys can't even courtesy flush because by the time they finally get that beefroll down the hatch, it's too late--the stink is everywhere by then. Not me, of course. But Bubba, next cell over--hooWEE! Let me tell you folks, it's true. This is America, can you believe it? Maybe it's fine in Gynna. Their poops are smaller, I guess. Short little people over there. Little people, little poops. And I don't like how you have to pull down the jumpsuit to drop a deuce, either. Everyone says I wear it well, though--the warden, the CO's. No one has ever looked more presidential in a jumpsuit, they say.",
">\n\nThis women deserves the credit mike pence is getting",
">\n\nIt’s really annoying that Mike Pence keeps getting any credit for anything. He showed he had a spine on the one day it matters, and then keeps trying to play the “we just need to put this behind us and focus on the “real”* issues”. Again, Mike Pence did the only thing that mattered of him on Jan 6, good. I’m glad he was there and did that.\nIt doesnt make him a good person. It doesnt make him smart. And without verbally attacking the person who sent a far right mob to kill him, he is fine with his life being put in danger for “owning the libs”. What a spineless piece of shit.\n*real meaning anything I can make up that forces democrats to react to, and usually it has nothing to do with true policy.",
">\n\nEh, you guys are just struggling to give credit where credit is due because of the R next to his name and disagreements on previous policies. Call a spade a spade, the man made a hard decision for the moment and he should be honored for it just like those that voted not to impeach Andrew Johnson in the 1860s and others that came before us who stood to keep our country hole.",
">\n\nIt’s honestly a question of if you think certifying votes should qualify as job done. I’d argue that when you see, firsthand, a fundamental threat to our democracy as the second in command you are duty bound to do more than turn the page.",
">\n\nI agree completely. I’d just like to push back that it’s a lot easier to say this on a Reddit thread than with 60,000 people screaming hang Mike Pence on your front door from constructed gallows. Anyone who says he doesn’t deserve credit is doing so because they are unable to come down from their tower.",
">\n\nThe problem with giving Pence too much credit is that it glosses over the fact that, prior to January 6th, Pence was trying really hard to do what Trump wanted. He was looking for any legal justification to not certify the election and was even entertaining the idea without one.\nIt's like giving someone a pat on the back for finally doing the right thing after they knowingly did the wrong thing.\nIn addition, that moment of courage by Pence gets completely washed away by his intransigence to comply with the investigation. All he cares about is his political ambitions.",
">\n\nMaybe so. But history will be written with Pence as a hero and that’s okay with me.",
">\n\nAnd cassidy Hutchinson should be. My original point. Yea, his co pilot through this entire shit show is a hero for doing his job. I don't feel bad for the situation they got themselves into. There were more than enough warning signs leading allll the way up to this day.",
">\n\nWelp... That's obstruction / destruction of evidence.",
">\n\nFor all the security cameras in public places you'd think we'd also have them for public offices.",
">\n\nThe difference is the people making those decisions are in the offices.",
">\n\nIt's probably more effective than flushing them.",
">\n\nOr eating them",
">\n\nOr stealing them.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 65%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nFormer Trump White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson indicated Mark Meadows, the White House chief of staff, burned documents in his fireplace roughly a dozen times in the final weeks of the administration, according to newly released transcripts of her House Jan. 6 committee depositions.\n\"The Presidential Records Act only asks that you keep the original copy of a document. So, yes,\" Hutchinson said when asked if she saw Meadows use the fireplace to burn documents.\n\"I know maybe three or four times - between two and four times, he had Mr. Perry in his office right before,\" Hutchinson told the committee, although she cautioned that she did not know what documents were burned.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Hutchinson^#1 Meadows^#2 burn^#3 document^#4 fireplace^#5",
">\n\nMerrick, you're up dude, jesus.",
">\n\nabdicated to jack smith to maintain independence so that the criminal process itself cannot be attacked to avoid justice.",
">\n\nthat was locker room destruction of government property. also trump has complete immunity. ALSO (somehow) he did nothing wrong.",
">\n\nI would assume that any document given to Mark Meadows was printed off and must be on a hard drive somewhere right? It's not the olden days when records were stored only on paper. So why was MM burning them?",
">\n\nHandwritten memos, received old school faxes, typewritten single copies. \nAlthough I did buy a used fax machine years ago that came from a gov’t office and stored on the carbon roll were months of a provincial cabinet minister’s outgoing communications.",
">\n\nShe’s very brave and I hope she can continue speaking truth to this national embarrassment",
">\n\nThis seems rather early 20th century don't you think? Republicans......ever behind the times. LOL.",
">\n\nTruly the Internet Explorer of political parties.",
">\n\nThe political party of AOL dialup.",
">\n\nBrought to you by Carl’s Jr.",
">\n\nWelcome to Costco, I love you",
">\n\nArrest the shitstain and his boss already DOJ.",
">\n\nSo no one is going to prison for this presidential crime spree? Really??",
">\n\nFun little felony.",
">\n\nPence only did the right thing because after talking to his lawyers, he realized he would be on legal trouble. He only did it for his own a**",
">\n\nAND after talking with Dan Quayle, checking if there was anything Pence could legally do to stop the certification.",
">\n\nBut what about Hillary’s emails ?",
">\n\nShe was the one who basically lied about the limo issue, right?\nJust checking.",
">\n\nWho else does stuff like this? Wait... I know... Don't tell me...\nOh! The Nazis! They did stuff like this.",
">\n\nArrest him?",
">\n\nThat whole “her email” and “her server” was literally a distraction.",
">\n\nWow. I can’t wait for something to be done about this. /s",
">\n\nThis is not at all surprising. Piece of shit doing piece of shit things.",
">\n\nMeadows was part of the planners for the J6 riots. He better start cooperating before he is sentenced to decades in prison.",
">\n\nWhen do we start injecting these crooks with Sodium Pentothal?",
">\n\nPut Meadows in jail already",
">\n\nNohing will happen.",
">\n\nCool, can't wait for the DOJ to continue to do nothing.",
">\n\nPence should have been a Leader and not a Denier, if he had half the spine Cassy has, he would be the leading 2024 GOP nominee!!!",
">\n\nOh I’m sure they’re still on somebody’s hard-drive or email server somewhere. Burning docs doesn’t clear things up in today’s world.",
">\n\nThere’s no evidence. It’s just her statement. She could be saying all these things bc she don’t like trump like most of you. Ya was okay with twitter censorship. Maybe Twitter ceo with most of its employees should be in jail for censoring and interfering in the election.",
">\n\nOh no. The guy who helped plan a coup burned some documents. Whatever will we do.",
">\n\nis this the same lady that saying what happened in the limo but wasnt even in the limo?",
">\n\nIf it turns out to be true, its bad and there should be consequences though - right?",
">\n\n“once they turned his office fireplace in December 2020”\nDoes anyone copy edit this stuff? What the hell is this supposed to mean?"
] |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.