nirantk/nli-triplets · Datasets at Hugging Face

anchor stringlengths 5 1.82k	entailment stringlengths 1 351	contradiction stringlengths 1 295	metadata dict
In a companion report, results from a survey of grant recipients are analyzed, giving both a quantitative and a qualitative sense of how the program was working.	A report analyzed a survey of grant recipients and gave both a qualitative and quantitive sense of how the program was coming along.	There was no analyzation of anything in the report.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
Figure 9: Illustration to Show How the Best Practice Model Would Apply to DOD's Acquisition Process	The illustration in Figure 9 is titled Show How the Best Practice Model Would Apply to DOD's Acquisition Process.	Illustrations in Figure 9 do not exist at all.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
Managing for Using the Results Act to Address Mission Fragmentation and Program Overlap ( GAO/AIMD-97-156, August 29,1997).	The report was issued on August 29, 1997.	The report was issued in 1940.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
At the back of the book, our helpful A to Z section provides detailed practical information on how to handle your stay in Malaysia.	Our helpful A to Z section is located at the back of the book, and it provides detailed practical information on handling the stay in Malaysia.	At the back of the book, there is a synopsis of the whole story.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
The rebuttal authors note still other problems in the original paper.	There are still other problems in the original paper according to rebuttal authors.	There are still other problems in the original paper according to the editors.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
The sample report sections in Appendix B are intended to illustrate the type of reporting contemplated by the Board.	The sample report illustrates the reporting the Board used.	The sample report illustrates the reporting the Board deleted.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
This relatively new and not as yet widely used study	This is a new study and has not been used often.	This is a very old study and is completely outdated.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
(His analysis is posted on the Web.)	The man's analysis was available online.	They never got around to posting their analysis online.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
And there's more.	The reader can expect to see additional developments.	That's all there is to it.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
For additional information on our objectives, scope, and methodology, see appendix I.	Appendix I has information on the scope and objectives we used.	Appendix I contains information on the images throughout the reports.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
Cameron's study.	Cameron owns a study.	Cameron isn't studying anything, nor has he ever.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
13 According to an August 1995 Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report, Violence Against Estimates from the Redesigned Survey (NCJ-154348) and a report by the American Psychological Association, Violence and the Report of the American Psychological Association Presidential Task Force on Violence and the Family	The Bureau of Justice released a special report in August of 1995.	There was no report published in August by the Bureau of Justice.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
The purpose of the exit conference is to confirm that the critical facts and key information used to formulate GAO's analyses and findings are current, correct, and complete.	The exit conference is being held to confirm that the key facts used to come up with in GAO's analyses are legitimate.	The main point of the exit conference is to confirm that the key facts used in GAO's analyses are incorrect.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
Patricia Perry believed that the recommendation was not yet comprehensive.	According to Perry, the comprehensiveness of the recommendation needed to be called into question.	Patricia Perry believed that the recommendation was comprehensive.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
In the last chapter, we covered instance selection.	We covered instance selection in the last chapter.	Instance selection is the primary feature in genome sequencing.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
In its best colleges issue two years ago, U.S.	In its top tertiary institutions publication two years ago.	In its worst colleges issue two years ago.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
The compromise that has developed is to include in the evaluation the questions of interest to the customer and to permit the researchers to determine what data elements are relevant to these questions and from whom and how they should be collected.	Researchers are free to choose their focus groups.	The subjects consist of many, anonymously chosen people and demographics.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
Sales comparisons were replaced with alcohol, and market reports - with snacks.	Alcohol and snacks took the place of reports.	Reports remained the most important thing.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
Chapters 2 through 10 address specific activities in the acquisition process.	There are 9 chapters that address acquisitions.	Acquisitions are only mentioned briefly in one chapter.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
The reports should be timely, fact-based, accurate, objective, convincing, clear, and as concise as the subject permits.	The reports should be based in fact.	The reports should be based in fact with some conjecture thrown in.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
1.9 Case Study Evaluations Appendix III Guidelines for Reviewing Case Study Reports	The third appendix deals with guidelines for reviewing case study reports.	The document only has 2 appendixes.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
Use of the guide should be selectively tailored to the requirements of particular reviews and adapted to the status of the acquisition.	The guide should only be used when required.	It will not be updated at all in the future.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
The fourth phase is examination of the second round of data collection and a revision of initial interpretations and expectations-the revise phase.	In the fourth phase, initial interpretations and expectations are revised.	The fourth phase follows the same steps as the first phase.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
The report is presented in three sections.	There are 3 sections in the report.	The report is divided into 5 sections.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
It's often interesting to wonder who brings the need for a correction to a paper's attention and why.	Sometimes I am not sure who asks for a correction.	I know exactly why people ask for a correction to a paper.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
The interested reader should inquire about the possibility of additional papers in the series.	The reader should ask about more papers being added to the series.	The reader should ask about other new projects being started.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
Does the study state clearly whether identification ofthese factors was based on insight and recognition or on quantitative techniques?	How does the study characterize its research procedures?	Factors were clearly based on observation of martians while eating cheese.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
APPENDIX SAMPLE REPORTS	the sample reports are in the appendix	the sample reports are not in the appendix	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
Participants referred to a landmark study on financial reporting by the Jenkins Committee4 as evidence that little has changed.	The study was used as evidence that things were still the same.	Participants felt that everything was different, citing the study as evidence.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
You should assess reliability if the data to be analyzed are intended to support the engagement findings, conclusions, or recommendations.	You should assess reliability of data to support conclusions or recommendations	Don't asses reliability	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
Evaluation Studies Review Annual, vol.	The yearly journal of evaluation.	Avoidance Methods Analysis volume.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
On my second go-round I cut 200 pages, dipping below the laminated Page 1,000 I'd presented in 1996 to Katy Medina, my editor at Random House, as evidence of my progress.	I cut 200 pages on my second attempt.	I presented in 1990 to Katy Medina as evidence of my progress.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
He cautioned that literature reviews generally do not include all relevant studies because studies with negative results are seldom published.	Studies with negative results are more likely to not get published according to him.	He believes that literature reviews are made with all the relevant information that is needed.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
These workpapers should be (1) clear about what steps the team took and what conclusions they reached and (2) reviewed by staff with appropriate skills or, if needed, technical specialists.	The workpapers should be clear about what steps the team took	The workpapers should not be clear about what steps the team took	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
Our Summary Judgment department, which saves you the trouble of reading reviews, will be upgraded into a service that will implant the consensus opinion on all the new movies, books, television shows, etc., directly into your brain, saving you the trouble of reading and seeing the books and shows themselves.	Our Summary Judgment department is going to be upgraded soon to introduce a service that can upload consensus opinions on most media items like movies and shows directly into the human brain.	The Summary Judgment department will be closing down because the project it wanted to introduce is being investigated for fraud.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
CONCLUSION	Summary	Introduction	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
The thoughts and observations of each group are reported below.	Below are the thoughts and observations reported.	The thoughts and observations of each group are reported above.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
(Appendix III gives a checklist for reviewing proposed or completed case studies for quality.)	A checklist of reviewing case studies can be found in Appendix III.	Appendix I gives a checklist for reviewing case studies.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
Preliminary data appear to confirm that the services provided by the program accelerate the transition of participants into alternative employment	Preliminary data appear to confirm that the services provided by the program accelerate the transition.	Preliminary data appear to confirm that the services provided by the program slow the transition.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
Table 6-9 shows the results of this analysis.	The results can be seen in Table 6-9	Table 9-6 illustrates the results of the analysis.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
First Year Report.	The report is for the first year.	The report is actually for the second year.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
Oh, hell--it's a lot more complicated than that, but it takes the basic facts and draws a picture of the results.	It is more complex than that, but it uses basic facts.	It is way simpler than what you are making it.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
The appendix (Table A1) presents demographic characteristics related to the quartiles in Table 1.	The demographics are listed in the appendix.	There are no demographics given.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
Appendix IV lists the major references used in preparing this report.	The major references utilized in this report are in Appendix IV	Appendix X is where you'll find the major references.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
The results of the study itself must be independently peer-reviewed no later than January 1, 2009.	By January 1, 2009, the study results must be independently reviewed.	The study itself is immune from peer-review and will go before Congress first.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
That is, they have an independent evaluator review the equivalent of their workpapers rather than providing so much detail in the report itself that a reader can come to the same conclusion.	Instead of overloading the report with detail, they hire an independent evaluator.	They have decided to forego any other evaluators and instead provide all the detail in the report.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
A Comparison of Participant Observation and Survey Data.	Comparing observed and compiled data.	There is no comparing observation and survey data.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
Together, they cover a wide range of evaluation questions, although clearly not all	They cover a wide range of evaluation questions.	They cover a just a small range of evaluation questions.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
A table of contents referenced to both page and paragraph numbers follows the summary.	The summary is followed by the table of contents.	The summary follows the table of contents.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
And so do those of 10 ten section editors.	So do the section editors.	Not the section readers.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
The credibility of these two studies is further enhanced by the fact that they were subject to extensive reexamination and reanalysis by an independent scientific analysis team of experts compiled by the Health Effects Institute (Krewski et al.	The credibility of the two studies is enhanced by how they are subject to reexamination.	The credibility of the two studies is decreased by how conflicting they are.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
James Bovard provides a useful compendium in the September 1996 American Spectator , drawing on the periodic critiques prepared by FEMA's own inspector general and the General Accounting Office.	James Bovard's compendium September 1996 American Spectator is not worthless.	Jame's Bovard's compendium in the September 1996 American Spectator did not draw on any materials by FEMA's staff.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
A list of our previous reports and testimonies on information security is provided at the end of this guide.	A list is given at the end of the guide of our previous reports and testimonies	No list of testimonies or reports is given	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
I've heard many criticisms of evolutionary psychology, but this is the first time I've heard anyone dismiss it by saying that all it can do is find the Holy Grail of behavioral science.	I have heard hundreds of views against evolutionary psychology.	I haven't heard a single criticism against evolutionary psychology.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
This guide outlines the results of that study.	The guide outlines what the study concluded.	The guide fails to outline what the study concluded.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
Nonetheless, some of the best reports have come from observers who entered as fully as possible as participants in the event being investigated.	Observers gave reports that were helpful.	Observers gave reports that were all worthless.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
outcomes for the programs for which the investments are reported.	Results regarding programs for which the investments are reported.	The investments are not featured in any report.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
Figure 5: The Preliminary Assessment	The Preliminary Assessment is figure 5.	This paper contains no assessments.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
Are the evaluation questions stated clearly and--?	The evaluation questions might be stated clearly.	The evaluation questions are actually just sentences. There are no questions.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
A more extensive evaluation, including an assessment of effects on long-term earnings, is currently planned for completion in 1999.	An evaluation including an assessment is currently planned to be completed in 1999.	An evaluation including an assessment is currently planned to be completed in 2053.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
Participants also cautioned that we need to move forward patiently toward a new comprehensive reporting model.	A new comprehensive reporting model is the way forward.	No warning was given to the participants at all.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
He cited a brief report and an upcoming chapter in a book about interventions with adolescents that describes how studies at Brown evaluate fidelity.	He noted about interventions with adolescents describing how studies at Brown evaluate fidelity.	He did not cite a report.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
Examine the evaluation process by reviewing records of the source selection procedures and	There are some records on the source selection procedures.	All the records of the source selection procedures are destroyed.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
I know that this report is the result of many long hours of hard work, research, sound study and innovative thought, Gordon said It is an impressive document that is worthy of the most serious and sustained consideration.	Gordon knows it took a long time to make the report.	Gordon believes that the document is unimpressive.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
It describes the need for and objective of the Report and Order.	It explains the importance of the Report and Order.	It does not focus on describing the objective of the report.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
But I boldly predict it won't work unless they have an entirely new thesis, since double-counting of corporate earnings is the core of their current one.	I predict that their current thesis will not serve them well into the future.	Their current thesis of double-counting corporate earnings will definitely help them to make it work.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
The analysis discusses why the Commission rejected these alternatives and instead selected those adopted in the Final Report and Order.	The analysis talks about why the Commission chose some alternatives over the others.	The analysis excludes anything to do with the Commission.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
on insight and recognition or on quantitative	Insight and recognition can be used.	Insight or recognition should be used with quantitative approaches.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
does it give a pretty good overview of everything or like does it give um i guess little encapsulated reports and and then a few big stories	Does it give a good summary or does it give small reports and then selected big content	It doesn't give any type of reports at all	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
Six Evaluation Issues That Synthesis Can Resolve Better Than Single Studies.	Synthesis can resolve some issues better than single studies.	Single studies are always better are solving evaluation issues than synthesized studies.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
Previous Readme columns	The Readme columns were listed previously.	There are no columns.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
Following up on known significant findings	The findings are significant.	The findings are unimportant.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
Appendix II describes each organization covered by our review.	Appendix II talks about each organization in the review.	Appendix II talks about the one organization that is reviewed.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
The report should not have errors in logic and reasoning.	The report should be error-free.	The report can have up to 10 errors.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
More than most papers, USA Today steps aside and delivers the experience that Dewey considered necessary to that convergence on statistics, direct lengthy quotations, complete box scores.	USA Today gives an experience that others do not, one that Dewy considers necessary to that of convergence upon statistics, long quotes and scores.	USA Today is not different at all and does not provide anything necessary,	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
Finally, the report is to include the summary findings of program evaluations completed during the fiscal year covered by the report.	At last, the report is supposed to include the overview of the findings, briefly.	The report will omit anything relevant to the program evaluations.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
If not these tests, which?	Which tests are they?	It's definitely these tests.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
Statistical Summary of 52 AID Lessons on Project Effectiveness.	Statisticsl summary of 52 aided lessons on project effectiveness	Statistic summaries didn't aid the project	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
pardon me oh i don't know there are better fields to pick	There are better sources available.	I'm not aware of other sources.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
In commenting on a draft of this report, the participants of our study	Study participants, while leaving feedback on this report's draft	Participants of the study refused to comment on this report's draft.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
(Or click to read my summary of Wolfe's and Rose's positions.)	To read my summary of Wolfe's position, click.	Click to exit out of my summary of Wolfe's position.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
1 The advantages and disadvantages of effluent grab and composite samples are listed	The advantages and disadvantages of effluent grab and composite samples are listed	The advantages and disadvantages of effluent grab and composite samples aren't listed	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
Lessons learned report or other report by the Contracting Officer describing negotiations and selection activities.	The Contracting Officer releases a report.	The Contracting Officer just read the report.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
There are specialized strategies for making these comparisons-namely, pattern matching, explanation building, and thematic review.	Some strategies are specialized at making comparisons.	All strategies are bad at making comparisons.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
However, the Departments point out in the preamble to the interim rules that many of the issues which would have been considered in such analyses were, in fact, considered.	The Departments point out that the analyses considered all issues that needed to.	The Departments point out that none of the issues were considered.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
37Appendix IV includes a list of educational websites on saving.	An educational websites list on financial saving.	Appendix IV includes a list of educational websites on sewing.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
8 as an assessment of the results of a program compared to its intended purpose.	The results have been assessed against the original, intended purpose.	No results have been received from the program.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
Later, I thought the subject required more analysis.	I believed that I would need to look more closely at the subject.	I was done analyzing the subject and decided to play basketball later.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
We will examine, and reject.	It is our intention to both examine and reject.	We will examine, but rejecting is out of the question.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
analyzed quantitatively in the final report (Finsterbush, 1984).	analyzed quantitatively in the final report (Finsterbush, 1984).	analyzed quantitatively in the final report (Finsterbush, 1933).	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
On May 24, 2000, we asked both the FFC Staff Director and the primary author of the FFC study to review and comment on a draft of this letter and enclosure I. Both concurred with our presentation of the information.	Both the FFC Staff Director and primary author of the FFC concurred with our presentation of the information.	The FFC Staff Directed disagreed with the information presented to him.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
I count on you guys for instant analysis, not the play-by-play.	I could on you for the analysis.	I come to you for the play by play.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
Chapters 1, 2, and 3 discuss the conduct of an investigation in an electronic	The first three chapters	The ninth chapter.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
Concerns about the reliability of value estimates from CV studies arose because research has shown that bias can be introduced easily into these studies if they are not carefully conducted.	If research is not carefully conducted, bias can be introduced.	If research is carefully conducted, bias will be introduced.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
Appendix I contains a worksheet, called an acquisition profile, to summarize essential information about the acquisition project.	The acquisition profile summarizes essential information about the acquisition project.	Appendix I does not contain any worksheets	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
Trying to apply those findings	Trying to get those findings to be applied.	Not bothering to apply any findings.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
CHAPTER 7: RESEARCH	The seventh chapter is about research.	The tenth chapter is about research.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
Therefore, this report summarizes the collective discussion and does not necessarily represent the views of any individual participant or GAO.	GAO does endorse the report as representative of their views.	This report is a detailed account of the collective discussion.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
Theme analysis also can proceed in matrix fashion.	Theme analysis can go forward in matrix fashion as well.	Theme analysis is not available in matrix fashion.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
In order to be comprehensive and cohesive, the researchers provide a great deal of detail and description and quote directly from the participants' own words and vignettes in the observers' field records.	The observers' field records are quoted by the participants and the researchers are thorough in their descriptions.	The researchers provided little details and barely any descriptions, it was difficult to read.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }

In a companion report, results from a survey of grant recipients are analyzed, giving both a quantitative and a qualitative sense of how the program was working.

A report analyzed a survey of grant recipients and gave both a qualitative and quantitive sense of how the program was coming along.

There was no analyzation of anything in the report.