nirantk/nli-triplets · Datasets at Hugging Face

anchor stringlengths 5 1.82k	entailment stringlengths 1 351	contradiction stringlengths 1 295	metadata dict
This document addresses the standards that should be used by the individuals conducting the broad array of work that is described more fully in chapter 2. Accordingly, the focus of this document is not on the wide variety of titles that are used by individuals conducting and reporting on this work, but instead the nature of the work that is being performed.	A variety of titles are included in this type of work.	The full range of titles related to this type of work is included in Appendix II.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
The agencies generally agreed with these conclusions, as well as the selected initial implementation approaches GAO identified, as shown below.	The agencies typically agreed to the results.	They were very upset by the findings.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
Finally, an appendix to the report summarizes recent	The appendix summarizes recent findings in the report.	The report has no appendix with a summary.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
Figures which the Results Group deemed too soft to be used in 2001 will eventually be moved to the reliable column.	The figures were deemed to be too soft.	The figures were not soft at all.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
You probably have been using these tests for years and have become quite proficient at them.	These tests have been around for years.	You couldn't have spent more than a year on these tests.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
A brief summary of the statement is presented.	The statement's summary is a short one.	The statement's summary is rather long.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
Newsweek 's cover package compares Watergate and Flytrap.	There is a comparison between Watergate and Flytrap on Newsweek's cover package.	There was no trace of a comparison between Watergate and Flytrap in NewsweeK	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
The greatest pitfall in the exploratory study is that is, the findings may seem so convincing that it can be difficult to resist pressures to report on these as if they had the strength of the larger study.	The greatest pitfall in the exploratory study is that the findings can be convincing.	The greatest pitfall in the exploratory study is that the findings make people very skeptical.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
and that was very helpful and we kept charts of our progress and uh consistently uh increased the amount of resistance so you could see how much you improved over the weeks	We charted our progress as we went along so that we could see how much we improved.	Keeping a chart was not all that helpful since it didn't show us our progress.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
For others' reports we plan to use in our studies, we should seek similar assurance in a report itself or from knowledgable persons.	We plan to use our studies.	We don't plan.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
(This technique, discussed in more detail in the section on analysis, can increase efficiency by reducing collection of data and large-scale analyses of these data that subsequently do not prove useful.)	This technique is more efficient by reducing the over collection of data.	This technique takes much longer to use.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
Any documents considered in such a study must be independently peer-reviewed no later than July 1, 2008.	Any documents considered must be peer reviews by July 1, 2008.	The documents aren't to reviewed by any time.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
McKay's critique remains only a draft, however, and it has not yet undergone the rigorous peer review that the original paper withstood.	His critique is still but a draft.	McKay's critique has gone under peer review already.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
Los University of California, Center for the Study of Evaluation, 1977.	The University of California, Center for the Study of Evaluation, 1977.	The Center for the Study of Examination, University of Columbia	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
(1995) analysis in the second row of Exhibit 15 and 16.	The analysis is in Exhibit 15 and 16.	The analysis is in Exhibit 15 and 19.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
2 shows the length of time that problems have remained open in order to demonstrate how quickly software problems are resolved once found.	2 shows how quickly problems are resolved once discovered.	2 is set up to show how quickly calls are returned.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
She noted that These projects are reviewed by a study section, but one that may be more forgiving than R-01 study sections.	The projects are reviewed.	THe projects are never reviewed, just discarded.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
Before I wrote you, I investigated your position in the planetary economy."	Before writing to you, I studied your position in the planetary economy.	I investigated your position in the planetary economy after I wrote to you.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
Commission officials confirmed that copies of both the Initial and the Final Regulatory Flexibility Analyses were submitted to the Chief Counsel, Small Business Administration.	Commission officials said the analysis were submitted to the Chief Counsel.	Commission officials said the analysis were submitted to the CEO.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
The increasing number of articles published on the basis of funded research, including announcements of several newly discovered properties of certain composite ceramics, is evidence of the utility of this part of the program.	The increasing number of articles published is evidence of the utility of this part of the program.	The increasing number of articles published is evidence against the utility of this part of the program.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
More recently, several new, long-term studies have been published that use improved approaches and appear to be consistent with the earlier body of literature.	There are new, published long-term studies that are consistent with the earlier literature.	There are new, published long-term studies that aren't consistent with the earlier literature.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
We hope that the glossary of terms will provide a useful reminder of related items as they reappear in the guide's discussions and in the criminal investigator's work.	Glossary terms reappear in the criminal investigator's work.	The criminal investigator is an underwater basket weaver.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
Matrix of Categories A method of displaying relationships among themes in analyzing case study data that shows whether changes in categories or degrees along one dimension are associated with changes in the categories of another dimension.	The Matrix of Categories shows relationships among themes.	The Matrix of Categories shows there are no relationships among themes.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
Resources for the Future, July 1998, Revised April 2000.	There are resources for the future.	Resources in the Past	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
A MEDLINE search of papers published using the MESH terms alcoholism AND treatment AND intervention yielded 47 publications during the calendar year 2000.	There were 47 publications using MESH terms during the year 2000.	There were 40 publications using MESH terms during the year 2000.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
The analysis considers data for average wages, the cost of specific processing equipment and the cost of conducting specific laboratory analyses.	The analysis considers what the average wages are.	The analysis just looks at staffing.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
Participants authored twenty papers that were distributed at the conference.	Twenty papers were presented to the conference participants.	None of the distributed papers were authored by participants.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
okay so how did this topic get picked did you did it just get picked at random or	How did they pick the topic?	They were assigned the topic.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
American Journal of Respiratory Critical Care Medicine 151: 669-674.	The journal is about Respiratory Critical Care.	The journal is about hospitals.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
Barnes knows these statistics help explain the unflattering public image of the legal profession.	Barnes has a good idea of the statistics.	Barnes knows these statistics are completely useless.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
(And, incidentally, sneering comparisons are a big part of the next round of SATs.	On the next set of SATs, comparisons will be a large part.	Comparisons are a small part of the SATs.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
Examples include the	Are included in the examples the	Are not included in the examples the	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
Center for the Study of Evaluation, International Monograph Series in Evaluation, April 1983.	The evaluation of the international monograph series.	The evaluation was done in April of 1988.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
The steps and practices presented in this executive guide are largely a synthesis of previously published information and analysis.	The steps and practices in this guide have largely been published elsewhere, too.	The steps and practices presented in this guide are not available anywhere else and have never been published anywhere.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
Lose the dismal cover illustrations and return to having a lead review or cover essay.	The lead review could have been done without the use of some color illustrations.	It is highly recommended that when submitting a cover essay, one should include a dismal cover illustration.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
Conclusions are presented in Chapter 7 and references in Chapter 8. Appendix A is located at the end of this report.	Conclusions are in chapter 7, references in chapter 8 and appendix a at the end of the report	Appendix a is at the beginning, conclusions in chapter 4 references in 5	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
cause and effect, is derived from agreement among the types of data sources, together with the systematic ruling out of alternative explanations and the explanation of outlier results.	There are alternative explanations from the different data sources.	There are no alternative explanations from the different data sources.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
As outlined below, we used several techniques to identify the study participants.	We used more than one method for identifying study participants.	We only used one technique to identify the study participants.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
Cross-tabulations of events can identify interactions and check the developing story more formally.	Cross tabbing can point out counter-indications.	There is no way to figure out where any interactions are located.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
Results in Brief	A short summary of the results.	A full explanation of the results.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
This report has some value but it is not as valuable as it once was.	This report is helpful, but not as much as it used to be.	This report is helpful, even moreso than it used to be.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
This series of reports also is useful for illustrating the way in which causality is established in case through development of internally consistent explanations of what led to what and the conscientious use of information from within the site and from contrasting sites to rule out alternative explanations.	Causality can be established using internally consistent explanations.	There is no way to establish causality in cases like these.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
and then you'll have a realistic assessment of what you're getting	at that point what you're getting becomes pretty clear	you can never be sure about what you're getting, they are just too vague on purpose	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
It offered reportage that chronicles the good, the bad, and the otherwise, and leaves readers fully informed and equipped to judge what deserves their attention and support.	It showed a balances report that allowed the readers to judge.	The reportage left readers completely in the dark.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
It shows the number of new problems reported and the number of problems closed in order to show a trend over time and to show any backlog that may be developing.	The is a trend behind the number of new problems.	There isn't any history of the problems.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
Following is a brief description of each critical success factor.	There is a description of each critical success factor.	There is a description of each critical success indicator.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
In addition, the specific key conditions and strategies described in this guide will provide insight when considering areas of future study.	This guide has material useful for future study.	This guide is only useful for present studies.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
For the purpose of the analyses presented here, the central features examined in the Initiative are identical to those contained in the Act.	The analysis was the same in the Act.	The analysis was completely different.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
Gentilello's results had a powerful impact on trauma surgeons because his study was an RCT.	Gentilello's study had a significant impact on trauma surgeons.	Trauma surgeons universally dismissed and ignored Gentilello's findings.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
it's primarily um a few big stories and then lots of high-level reports	It's mostly not smaller stories or medium-level reports.	It's mostly small stories and ordinary reports.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
Conclusions are logical inferences about the program based on the auditors' findings and should flow from the findings, instead of representing a summary of them.	Conclusions are logical inferences about the program based on the auditors' findings.	Logical inferences of the program ignore the findings of the auditors.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
Analysis of multiple types	There are several different types that have been analyzed.	Analysis of a single type	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
This index provides references to the topic in (1) this Volume, (2) the original statements, and (3) Volume 2. References to the original statements are organized as The first character indicates that it is a Concepts Statement (C) or a Standards Statement (S).	This index refers to another statement.	There are no such things as indexs.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
The findings confirm the expectation to some extent, but the split is not clean.	The split wasn't clean according to the findings.	The findings were the complete opposite of what was expected.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
This publication has been produced as part of the Laboratory's strategic long-term research plan.	The publication was part of the long-term plan for the lab.	The publication was part of the short-term plan for the lab.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
We'd be grateful if you took a few minutes to fill out our second annual online reader survey.	We would appreciate you taking some time to complete our survey.	They would hate if you took the online survey.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
See appendix II for a detailed description of the long-term modeling methodology.	Appendix II contains a detailed description of the long-term modeling methodology.	Appendix II does not contain a detailed description of the long-term modeling methodology.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
The analysis includes the information required by paragraph 604(a) by summarizing and evaluating relevant comments received.	The information needs to be included in the analysis.	The analysis is specified by paragraph 606.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
Within-Study Variation	Variation within studies.	External-Study Variation	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
But most of all, they say, forget population statistics and instead look at the laboratory.	They say that the library should be considered rather than the population statistics.	They say "Forget the laboratory, check out the population statistics!".	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
Moreover, it is virtually impossible to analyze the documentation.	There's pretty much no way to analyze the documents.	Analyzing the documentation can easily be done.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
Table 3.4 summarizes the design, data collection, analysis, and reporting features of program implementation case studies.	Design and data collection are included in the Table 3.4 summary.	Table 3.4 deals exclusively with data collection.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
For example, individual accounts-discussed more fully in Q4.	Individual accounts receive more detailed discussion in Q4.	Individual accounts aren't discussed in any more in detail in Q4.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
A good study informs the reader early in the report about the questions that were answered and the issues that were investigated.	The questions that were answered are mentioned early in a good report.	The best reports don't tell what the issues addressed are until it addresses them.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
Various reviewers have argued that 1) the long-term estimates may be biased high and/or 2) the short-term estimates may be biased low.	Reviewers have argued that long-term estimates could be biased and that short-term estimates might also have a low bias.	All reviewers are satisfied with the long and short-term estimates.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
The Bearing of Comparative Analysis on Sociological Theory.	What comparative analysis means to sociological theory	The bearing of quantitative analysis on the development of sociological thought.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
Graphs published by TBR, based on data compiled by Independent Project	TBR published graphs based on information put together by the Independent Project.	The graphs were published by ABC and based on data gathered by the Innocence Project .	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
The most important part of it was a test of a robotic intelligence RQ, determining the level of robotization of a human mind regarding reliability in performing standard tasks, speed of work performed, error ratio, length of work performed without the need to restart, and the number of tasks performed simultaneously.	The human mind can be regards as a level of robotization.	Robot intelligence does not require information from humans.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
Alternatively, all themes within one site can be analyzed first; then data from the second (and subsequent) sites can be examined.	Data from the next site can be examined after the first has been looked at in depth.	The other site's data must be examined first before all themes from one can be analyzed.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
Some of these differences are described in the final section of this guide.	Some of these differences are described in the final section of this guide.	All of these differences are described in the final section of this guide.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
The trouble with this kind of detailed analysis is it implies that any competent craftsman could carefully study the performer's techniques and replicate them--Hoffman's preparation.	The analysis is flawed.	Replication is an easy process.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
User's Guide for the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R.	There is a User's Guide for the DSM-III-R.	Structured Clinical Interviews are not part of the DSM-III-R	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
The first appendix covers relevant issues addressed in GAO's reports (responses to agency requests).	The GAO's reports were covered in the first appendix.	The second appendix covers all the issues in the GAO's report.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
right and try to determine if what you read was objective or not and	Can you determine if what you read was biased or not?	You shouldn't try to evaluate if what you read was objective or biased.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
The references will appear in brackets at the end of each paragraph or illustration.	At the end of each paragraph or illustrations, that's where the references will appear.	There will be nothing at the end of each paragraph or illustration.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
The comments submitted to the Commission and live testimony indicated widely disparate agricultural needs.	Wide variance in agricultural needs were indicated by the comments and testimony.	The comments indicated all the agricultural needs were the same.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
This process is designed to ensure that sufficient credible evidence is present to support the report's conclusions and recommendations.	The final parts of this report must have believable evidence.	This process will not aid in the conclusions of this report.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
Main Points of the Preliminary Review and Critique of the Revised Analyses by the HEI Peer Review Panel.	The HEI Peer Review Panel outlines their main points of the critique.	The Main Points are not the most detailed or important parts of a report.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
that sounds good if you were short on time you could get a summary real quick	You can get a summary if you don't have much time.	It's not possible to get a summary because we have so much time for it.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
The Conference Report on IRCA noted in discussing the SAW program that the Committeewas ever mindful of the reports of abuses that occurred during the old Bracero program.	The old Bracero program saw some reports written about abuses.	The Committee fully addressed the reports of abuses from the old Bracero program.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
Paper presented at the Evaluation Network annual meeting, Chicago, Ill., October 1983.	The paper was presented in October of 1983.	The meeting was held in cities across North Dakota.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
Evaluation Studies Annual, vol.	The evaluation studies have an annual volume.	Evaluation Studies Daily,vol.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
You'll be able to cruise from article to review to column to department with a growing feeling that you're absolutely right about everything.	All of the material will solidify your beliefs in things.	You will see a lot of material that disproves your personal thoughts.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
(For more on the flight, see Slate 's Assessment of Glenn.)	Slate's Assessment of Glenn has more information about the flight.	There is no more to be found on the flight.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
We must be careful when interpreting the results of studies, and in our own design of screening procedures, that we are clear about the endpoints we are measuring.	We should be clear about what endpoints we are measuring in our studies.	It is not necessary to be particular when interpreting the results of studies.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
Thus, while the document offers preliminary guidance, it is also a point of departure.	The document offers preliminary guidance.	The document offers final guidance.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
We preceded our case study work with an extensive review of financial management literature, guides, and reports.	To begin our study we reviewed financial management literature, guides, and reports.	To begin our session, we brushed up on our knowledge of fictional literature.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
RECOMMENDED REPORTING	Recommended reporting	Not recommended reporting	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
We formed an advisory group to assist with job design, our overall scope and methodology, and case study selection as well as to critique our research findings and comment on our draft report.	One of the goals of the advisory group was to critique the research conclusions.	We didn't form an advisory group because it would be a waste of time.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
6.1 The data analysis examples included in the manual specify an alpha level of 0.01 for testing the assumptions of hypothesis tests and an alpha level of 0.05 for the hypothesis tests themselves.	The data analysis examples included in the manual specify an alpha level of 0.05 for testing hypotheses.	The data analysis examples included in the manual specify an alpha level of 0.3 for all testing.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
1 See test methods (see Sections 11-14) for specific supplies.	The test methods for the supplies can be seen.	Sections 5-10 offer discussion on test methods in relation to the specific supplies.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
The results were reported to the equal justice community and posted on the Florida Legal Services website, www.floridalegal.org.	The results were reported and posted on the Florida legal services website.	They forgot to post the results to the Florida legal services website.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
It deserves further study.	It should be studied further.	The research gathered already is fully sufficient.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
That bizarre finding is reported in the Journal of Scholarly Publishing 's latest issue, which cites a 1991 study on reader retention of information.	The result of the investigation was strange and it bewildered people.	The report, which can be found in the latest issue of the Journal of Scholarly Publishing, was exactly what everyone was expecting.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
Across-study variation can result from two possible causes.	It can result from two likely causes.	The study deviation comes from one cause.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
The project manager or Contracting Officer's Technical Representative may be the best source for problem reports.	One good source for problem reports is the project manager.	Problem reports should only be sourced from the project manager.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
i need to look into it more you know it's you know it sometimes even with the newspaper they say they'll only take certain types of paper you know they won't take paper that's shiny	I need to see what types of paper they will not take.	They take all types of paper.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
The first of five special issues about the 21 st century imagines health and environment in the future.	There were several issues about the 21st century.	The issues all dealt with the 20th century.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
The key points of their critique of The Bell Curve are as	The key points of their Bell Curve critique are as.	The key points of the Dewey Decimal system are.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }
A double issue examines life in 1000 A.D.	A double issue is examining life in 1000 A.D.	There haven't been any issues that are able to examine life in 1000 A.D.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Appendix" }

This document addresses the standards that should be used by the individuals conducting the broad array of work that is described more fully in chapter 2. Accordingly, the focus of this document is not on the wide variety of titles that are used by individuals conducting and reporting on this work, but instead the nature of the work that is being performed.

A variety of titles are included in this type of work.

The full range of titles related to this type of work is included in Appendix II.