anchor
stringlengths 5
1.82k
| entailment
stringlengths 1
351
| contradiction
stringlengths 1
295
| metadata
dict |
|---|---|---|---|
Within-study variation refers to the precision with which a given study estimates the relationship between air quality changes and health effects.
|
Within-study variation is a measurement of precision
|
Within-study variation is a measurement of time
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
The estimated relationship from the Che stnut and Rowe study is only directly applicable to the populations represented by survey respondents.
|
There is a relationship between Chestnut and Rowe study.
|
The Chestnut and Rowe study are both separate and have no relation to eachother.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
Projections based on intermediate assumptions of the 2001 HI Trustees' Report.
|
Projections are based on the 2001 HI Trustee's Report.
|
Projections are based on attendee numbers of Disney Land.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
Following is a summary of stewardship data for the Ceramic Materials Research Programs for the 5 fiscal years ending September 30, 199V through 199
|
Herein is contained a brief explanation of the Ceramic Materials Research Programs for a period of 5 years.
|
This summary of data includes material from fiscal years prior to 1600.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
The 2001 Retirement Confidence Summary of Findings.
|
A retirement confidence summary of findings was published in 2001
|
This is a summary from the year 2021.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
The Academy's report also tells us that there are many unanswered questions about climate change, which makes it difficult to determine what levels of greenhouse gas emissions need to be avoided.
|
The Academy's report says we don't know everything about climate change.
|
The Academy's report says we know everything about climate change.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
For the remaining 10 percent, however, the analysis stated that the program would impose a significant adverse effect in the first year.
|
The analysis claimed that the program would create a major adverse effect in the first year.
|
The analysis suggested that the program would have a great positive effect in only the first year.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
The analysis of variability of access
|
The experiment is about the variability of access.
|
The project is about how many hot dogs a person can eat.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
The exhibits powerfully document the build-up to the dropping of the atomic bomb on Nagasaki and the appalling effects of the blast itself and its aftermath.
|
The exhibits documented the build-up to the dropping of the atomic bomb on Nagasaki.
|
The exhibit does not demonstrate anything relating to an atomic bomb.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
In its September 2001 advisory on the draft analytical blueprint for the second Section 812 prospective analysis, the SAB cited the Thurston and Ito study as a significant advance in understanding the effects of ozone on daily mortality and recommended re-evaluation of the ozone mortality endpoint for inclusion in the next prospective study (EPA-SAB-COUNCIL-ADV-01-004, 2001).
|
The Thurston and Ito study helped understand the ozone.
|
The Thurston and Ito study was about the over fishing of the Pacific.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
The analysis does discuss, however, what APHIS considers to be the anticipated impact on the U.S. livestock the farrow-to-finish swine operators, the live-hog dealers/transporters, and the swine slaughterers/primary processors.
|
APHIS did an analysis on the impact of operators on US livestock.
|
The farrow-to-finish swine operators do not impact US livestock.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
Table 3.5 illustrates such a difference.
|
Table 3.5 shows that difference.
|
Table 3.5 shows precisely that similarity.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
Each of the scenario assumptions are described more fully in the sections that follow.
|
Explanations of the scenarios can be found in the following sections.
|
The scenario assumptions are fully described as is.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
In requesting an analysis of These four scenarios, the Senate request asked for results through 2020, in periods of five years or less, using the Annual Energy Outlook 2001 (AEO2001) as the baseline.
|
The Senate request asked for results through 2020 in periods of five years or less, for an analysis of these four scenarios.
|
The Annual Energy Outlook 2001 (AEO2001) was never used as a baseline.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
However, there are still major gaps in the science of mercury fate, transport, and transformation that make such an assessment difficult at time.
|
It is difficult to make an assessment of the science of mercury fate, transport, and transformation
|
It's actually very easy to make assessments of the science of mercury fate, transport, and transformation despite the major gaps involved.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
A Report on Revised NMMAPS Morbidity by Analysts at Harvard University.
|
Analysts at Harvard University have submitted a report on Revised NMMAPS Morbidity.
|
Harvard University's analysts never managed to finish the report.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
In EPA's judgment, the Chestnut and Rowe study contains many of the elements of a valid CV study and is sufficiently reliable to serve as the basis for monetary estimates of the benefits of visibility changes in recreational areas.
|
The chestnut and rowe study contains elements of a valid CV study according to the EPA.
|
According to the EPA the chestnut and row study doesn't include any elements of a valid CV study.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
Five of the 26 studies are contingent valuation (CV) studies, which directly solicit WTP information from subjects; the rest are wage-risk studies, which base WTP estimates on estimates of the additional compensation demanded in the labor market for riskier jobs, controlling for other job and employee characteristics such as education and experience.
|
Five studies are CV studies.
|
Nine studies are CV studies.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
An initial analysis, to be prepared for a proposed rule, is to describe the impact of the proposed rule on such hospitals and include the matters required under 5 U.S.C.
|
An initial analysis is supposed to describe the impact of the proposed rule on the hospitals.
|
An initial analysis is supposed to describe the impact of the proposed rule on the environment.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
One possibility is that studies report different estimates of the single true relationship between a given pollutant and a health effect due to differences in study design, random chance, or other factors.
|
The studies have various reports.
|
The reports are perfect.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
On the other hand, some analysts do not necessarily agree with the assumptions and projected level of impacts in the CEF assessment despite the fact that it was peer-reviewed and its findings published this fall in an academic journal.
|
The assumptions in the CEF assessment aren't agreed upon by analysts.
|
Most analysts agree with the projected impact levels in CEF's findings.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
(Click for a Slate Dialogue on population trends.)
|
Population trends are displayed in a Slate Dialogue.
|
Click for a Slate Dialogue on pollution trends.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
Review of Economics and Statistics (May 2000 forthcoming).
|
It was the May edition.
|
They published the review in 2017.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
Exhibits 15 and 16 present the results of the Alternative calculations.
|
Tw exhibits present the figures from the Alternative calculations.
|
Exhibit 15 is not related to Exhibit 16.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
It would be easy to dismiss these explanations as being nonsense, but you'll understand India better if you can appreciate that what each guide is saying may in its own way be true.
|
Though the guides often seem to be talking rubbish, there is a certain value in what they say.
|
You'll have a much better time in India if you ignore every guide and stick to your travel brochures.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
Nonetheless, the differences in the resulting baseline projections are minor for the purposes of this analysis.
|
The baseline projections are only marginally different for this analysis.
|
There are large differences in the baseline projections for the purpose of this analysis.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
The 1996 Twin Cities study, for example, found marked differences in weight concern.
|
With the study from the 90s they were able to make their point.
|
They cited the study from the 2016 publication.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
In its submission, HUD states that its Analysis reflects [its] assessment that
|
The submission by HUD states its analysis is a reflection assessment.
|
In its essay, the FBI states that its analysis of Donald Trump is very rough.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
REMSAD was also used to estimate the changes in visibility and deposition of mercury, nitrogen, and sulfur.
|
REMSAD has been used to find evidence of mercury, nitrogen, and sulfur.
|
Mercury, nitrogen and sulfur are not earth elements.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
While you glide along, multilingual commentaries tell you about the sights.
|
Commentaries tell you about the sights while you glide along.
|
The commentaries about the sights are only in English.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
Exhibit A-5 in Appendix A depicts the timeline expected for completing a single unit installation of ACI.
|
A timeline is exhibited in the Appendix A.
|
Exhibit A-5 in Appendix A depicts a picture of a dog.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
LC50s were estimated by the graphical or Spearman-Karber method.
|
LC50s had been estimated by the Spearman-Karber method.
|
LC50s were estimated by the Steve berman method.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
For demographic trends and the financial outlook for the Social Security and Medicare Hospital Insurance programs, we used the intermediate actuarial projections, which reflect the best estimate of the Social Security and Medicare Boards of Trustees.
|
Intermediate actuarial projections helped us estimate with the best data.
|
For demographic trends we used beginners actuarial projections.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
The most extensive study and analyses has been based on data from two prospective cohort groups, often referred to as the Harvard Six-City study (Dockery et al.
|
Two prospective cohort groups have been the basis for most study.
|
The Harvard Six-City study is very minor and did not receive much analysis.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
Additional precision data for each of the tests described in this manual are presented in the sections describing the individual test methods.
|
In the sections that describe the individual test methods, are presented additional precision data for each of the tests described.
|
In the sections that describe the individual test methods, are presented labels for each of the tests described.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
The Impact of Pensions and 401(k) Plans on A Critical Assessment of the State of the Literature, paper prepared for the conference, ERISA After 25 A Framework for Evaluating Pension Reform.
|
This is referencing a paper which was written for a conference.
|
''There was no paper written for the conference, ERISA''
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
Table 4-2 shows AC injection rates estimated from the data provided a comprehensive assessment of ACI under a range of scenarios.
|
Table 4-2 shows AC injection rates estimated and an assessment of ACI under different scenarios.
|
Table 4-2 is blank.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
Exhibits 15 and 16 present the results of these sensitivity analyses for 2010 and 2020, respectively.
|
Sensitivity analyses for 2010 and 2020 are both contained in exhibits 15 and 16.
|
The results from exhibit 15 was for 2012.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
We summarize these adjusted values in Exhibit 11.
|
The values are summarized in Exhibit 11.
|
The values are showcased in Exhibit 12.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
The request should also provide Return on Investment projections, other available financial analyses, and cost, revenue, and volume estimates for the new service for the entire proposed test period.
|
Financial analyses and estimates should be provided for the entire proposed test period.
|
The request does not provide any kind of financial analyses, projections, or estimates.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
The working group asked the highly respected National Academy of Sciences to provide us the most up-to-date information about what is known and about what is not known on the science of climate change.
|
The working group asked the NAS to give information about climate change.
|
The working group asked the EPA to give information about climate change.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
An SAB advisory letter indicates that many members of the Council believe that the Chestnut and Rowe study is the best available.
|
The Chestnut and Rowe study is not the only study available.
|
The SAN advisory has stated that it does not believe the Chestnut and Rowe study is the best.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
Exhibit 18 Key Sensitivity Analyses for the Clear Skies Act in 2020A
|
An analysis of the main areas the act is sensitive in.
|
Exhibit 18 is a glossary of terminology used.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
Ceramic Materials Research Program
|
research the ceramic materials.
|
don't research ceramics
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
Amy's View , the best of the recent works to show up here, is a more familiar and successful exercise.
|
The best work to appear here recently is Amy's View.
|
Amy's View ranks at the bottom of the works that have ever shown up here.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
The results of the test are given in terms of two endpoints, the No-Observed-Effect Concentration (NOEC) and the Lowest-Observed-Effect Concentration (LOEC).
|
There are two possible results for the test.
|
There are many possible results for the test.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
Across-study variation refers to the fact that different published studies of the same pollutant/health effect relationship typically do not report identical findings
|
The variation refers to the fact that different studies of the same pollutant don't have the same results.
|
Every study about pollutants shows exactly the same outcomes.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
The Port of New York offered a critical test because, given the diversity of imports and the volume of work, if problems were occurring, they would be likely to show up clearly in this site.
|
The Port of New York was a critical test.
|
Diversity and volume of work are low.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
Your measurement in Jacob Weisberg's The Slate Arts Index appears to be a well-intended method for annual comparisons.
|
Your measurement seems to be a method for annual comparisons.
|
You never made a measurement for annual comparisons at all.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
This mail is insignificant, except for FY 1987, the first year the study was conducted.
|
The study was first conducted in 1987.
|
The mail is quite significant for the study.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
As opposed to the function in the original study, which used median levels.
|
The function in the original study uses median levels.
|
The function in the original study uses averages.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
The analysis discussed the potential impact on the U.S. livestock sector, feedlot operators, live cattle dealers/transporters, cattle slaughterers/primary processors, and the dairy industry.
|
The analysis was about livestock and their industries.
|
The analysis mentioned only the cattle transportation.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
There are several issues to consider when evaluating study quality, including but not limited to 1) whether the sample estimates of WTP are representative of the population WTP; 2) whether the good to be valued is comprehended and accepted by the respondent; 3) whether the WTP elicitation format is designed to minimize strategic responses; 4) whether WTP is sensitive to respondent familiarity with the good, to the size of the change in the good, and to income; 5) whether the estimates of WTP are broadly consistent with other estimates of WTP for similar goods; and 6) the extent to which WTP responses are consistent with established economic principles.
|
There are more than five issues to consider when evaluating study quality.
|
There is only one issue to consider when evaluating study quality.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
Due to the inherent uncertainty surrounding long-term projections, the Trustees' reports also include two other sets of assumptions, a high-cost and a low-cost alternative.
|
The Trustee's reports include two sets of assumptions.
|
The other assumption's a medium-cost alternative.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
Combinations of the 4 symptoms for which WTP estimates are available that closely match those listed by Schwartz, et al.
|
Estimates are available by the WTP.
|
The WTP no longer provides any estimates on combinations.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
TABLE 1. NATIONAL INTERLABORATORY STUDY OF CHRONIC TOXICITY TEST PRECISION, 1991: SUMMARY OF RESPONSES USING A REFERENCE TOXICANT1
|
Table 1 contains a study of chronic toxicity test precision.
|
There haven't been any summaries of responses listed.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
recommendations addressing sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, or mercury at any time after the study has been completed under paragraph (a)(2) and the peer review process has been completed under subsection (b).
|
The recommendations addressed mercury.
|
The recommendations did not address mercury.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
Combinations of the 3 symptoms for which WTP estimates are available that closely match those listed by Pope, et al.
|
There are 3 symptoms that have WTP estimates available.
|
There are 2 symptoms for which there are WTP estimates available.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
At the very least, Flytrap illustrates the need for less fact chasing and more analysis and illumination of the what should we do about it question.
|
Flytrap shows that we need to revise our strategies.
|
We need more fact checking and less analysis.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
We have reviewed the facts and listened to many theories and suppositions.
|
We've reviewed the facts and listened to lots of theories.
|
We ignored the facts and theories.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
Will you describe them to me?" I studied the proofs attentively.
|
Please describe them, I said as I closely examined the proofs.
|
Don't tell me anything about them, I stated as I ignored the proofs.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
The analysis so far suggests the following possibilities for further
|
The conclusion the the time is that there are more possibilities.
|
The analysis so far does not suggest any additional possibilities.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
But, look here, Bauerstein had had it analysed already?
|
Bauerstein had already looked at it.
|
Bauerstein has not seen it yet.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
Bauerstein had it analysed ”that's just it!
|
Bauerstein examined the pertinent items himself.
|
Bauerstein asked a colleague to conduct all the necessary tests.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
In your advice column you recently offered this particular bit of advice: Prudie finds the appellation 'Ms.
|
Prudie finds the Label "Ms." as stated in your recent article.
|
Prudie had no opinion on the label "Ms."
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
Volume II presents the standards alphabetized by topic, pulls together all references to a particular topic in one section, and integrates illustrative material from both the SFFASs and the original Exposures Drafts wherever possible.
|
The standards alphabetized by topic, pulling together all references to a particular topic in one section, and integrating illustrative material from both the SFFASs and the original Exposures Draft wherever possible--those are all achieved in Volume II.
|
Volume II presents the methods of crime not yet known to the public, as well as how to protect yourself from them.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
Conclusions are stronger if they set up the report's recommendations and convince the knowledgeable user of the report that action is necessary.
|
Conclusions are better if they set up the report's recommendations and show the user that the report needs to be implemented.
|
Conclusions are better if they set up the report's recommendations and show the user that the report do not need to be implemented.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
How important are these essays compared to SAT scores as a college determines acceptances, and are the essays fair assessments of a students' abilities?
|
Are the essays just as important are the ones on the SAT's?
|
The essays were not worth doing.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
Long-term studies examine the potential relationship between longer-term and shorter-term use.
|
Studies examined the relationship between long and short term use.
|
The long term studies only examined long term use.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
4. If other studies relevant to the issue are available, havetheir results been presented and reconciled with the case study findings?
|
How do other studies match up to this case study?
|
Results cannot be assessed do to implosion of the earth.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
well i guess i also have been reading uh a lot of things on uh quality improvement and that type of thing because that's what i'm involved in a lot at work
|
I have been reading a lot on quality improvement because my job involves it.
|
My work involves only quality improvement.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
There's more good stuff in Briefing, including Explainer, The Week/The Spin, and Slate
|
There is good things in the sections.
|
They did not find a single one interesting.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
The results of these reanalyses confirmed and expanded those of the original investigators.
|
The reanalysis results confirmed the original investigations.
|
The reanalysis results showed major problems with the original investigations.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
However, there is a lot of dialogue taking place today concerning business reporting.
|
There is lots of dialogue today concerning business reporting
|
There isn't much discussion about business reporting
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
Its impact analyses do consider information and comments developed in connection with its fee schedule rules for prior years.
|
The analyses demonstrate a consideration for the information.
|
The information and comments were not a factor that was considered when conducting the analyses.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
The final results of the reanalysis were then independently peer reviewed by a Special Panel of the HEI Health Review Committee.
|
A special panel reviewed the final analysis independently.
|
The final analysis was accepted by the committee without further review.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
on your editor do you do uh does it do spell correcting or any kind of thesaurus work
|
Does any sort of thesaurus work?
|
Thesauruses dont work?
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
Several provided additional supporting points and examples, which we have included in the report as appropriate.
|
Several gave more information and we have put that in the report.
|
Several gave more information and we left that out of the report.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
GAO reports have been used with good results, however, in cumulative case studies published by others outside GAO.
|
There have been good results that have come from utilizing GAO reports.
|
GAO reports have been used to disappointing results.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
The analysis then compares actual findings to expectations.
|
The analysis compares results to expectations.
|
The analysis compares results to the results of other studies.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
In the case of issues raised by the respondents, this appendix explains the basis of the Board's conclusions.
|
The basis for what the Board concluded can be found in this appendix.
|
This appendix contains a diagram of the human body and all of its bones.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
Review of Economics and Statistics (May 2000) and N. Gregory Mankiw, Macroeconomics, 4th edition (2000), p.
|
Review of economoics and statistics was published in May 2000.
|
Review of economics and statistics was published in 1998.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
The analysis provides the information required by paragraphs 603(b)(1) through (b)(3).
|
The analysis has the required information in it.
|
The analysis only provides part of the information.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT SAMPLE REPORT (continued)
|
An example of a report on research.
|
The final version of the report.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
The report is organized into eight chapters and one appendix.
|
The report contained 8 chapters and an appendix
|
The report was just one long chapter
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
in Consumer Digest or a Consumer Reports
|
Do you prefer Consumer Digest or Consumer Reports?
|
I would never read Consumer Reports or Consumer Digest.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
This triggers the third test.
|
The third test begins after something else.
|
This triggers the first test.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
He once submitted an article with 95% confidence intervals and it was rejected because it had no p values.
|
One he submitted an article that had high confidence intervals.
|
All of his articles have been reviewed.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
um special thing buying land and building our own house and they did an analysis for us based on what we were putting in and the time frame that we wanted to look at
|
They did a projection for what we want to do in the time frame we need it accomplished,
|
Having an analysis is really not that important. you can always add time and money.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
We asked officials of the various organizations highlighted in the case illustrations and throughout the report to verify the accuracy of the information presented on their activities and incorporated their comments as appropriate.
|
The case illustrations highlighted a number of organizations.
|
We didn't ask any of the officials from the organizations highlighted in the case illustrations to verify the accuracy of the information presented.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
If you are baffled by the choice, remember the main types and experiment.
|
Remember the main types and experiment if you are confused by the choice.
|
Just forget about the main types and experiment, they won't aid you at all.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
At least we won't have to read The Healing Process on the editorial page the following day.
|
The Healing Process won't be on the editorial page.
|
The Healing Process is always printed on the editorial page.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
It is undertaken prior to testing the effects of the program, chiefly, however, as an indicator of appropriate evaluation design.
|
It is done before testing the effects on the program, but us indicative of evaluation design.
|
It is done after testing the effects.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
4 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE
|
The first section.
|
Long title.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
In this study, the Commission has sought to provide its best estimates within the time provided.
|
The commission has sought to provide its best estimates in this study.
|
The commission made no effort to provide it's best estimates in the study.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
Kimi Jackson, author of the Colorado Legal Services study, said the surveys were detailed and the responses consistent across the state.
|
The surveys were said to be quite detailed.
|
The responses differed greatly among the states.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
You don't need to read the results off graph paper.
|
You needn't read the results off graph paper.
|
You need to read the results off graph paper.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
In her letter dated June 7, 2000, the FFC Director said that the letter fairly and objectively presented the findings of the FFC study, and the primary author in his letter dated June 5, 2000, said that the abridgement of the study both accurately reflected the report and maintained its spirit and intent.
|
Her letter was dated June 7, 2000.
|
her letter was dated march 6, 1998.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
But by now the statistics have been gone over by professionals, who have come up with different results.
|
The professional have different results.
|
The statistics are the same across the board.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
Shapiro, E. Educational Rethinking the Criteria of Competence.
|
SHapiro wrote the report.
|
Shindling wrote the report.
|
{
"objective": {
"paired": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment"
]
],
"self": [],
"triplet": [
[
"anchor",
"entailment",
"contradiction"
]
]
},
"topic": "Appendix"
}
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.