premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Katrina is not grotesque.
Arthur is gentle.
Mark is compassionate.
Arthur is not grotesque.
Arthur is not entire.
Jimmy is grotesque.
Helena is not stormy.
Jimmy is gentle.
Jimmy is not stormy.
Danna is gentle.
Katrina is not compassionate.
Helena is grotesque.Someone is friendly and stormy if and only if he is not entire and not gentle.
Sherwin being entire and Jimmy being not stormy imply that Helena is not friendly.
Someone who is not stormy is always not entire.
Jimmy is not compassionate if and only if Arthur is not friendly.
If someone is not entire and stormy, then he is compassionate, and vice versa.
If someone is not entire or compassionate, then he is stormy.
If Katrina is not grotesque, then Helena is compassionate and Arthur is stormy.
It can be concluded that Danna is not gentle once knowing that Arthur is entire.
If there is someone who is either not friendly or not grotesque, then Arthur is not compassionate.
If there is someone who is entire, then Danna is compassionate.
If someone is stormy, then he is gentle, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not compassionate, he is entire and not gentle. | Arthur is grotesque. | contradiction |
Katrina is not grotesque.
Arthur is gentle.
Mark is compassionate.
Arthur is not grotesque.
Arthur is not entire.
Jimmy is grotesque.
Helena is not stormy.
Jimmy is gentle.
Jimmy is not stormy.
Danna is gentle.
Katrina is not compassionate.
Helena is grotesque.Someone is friendly and stormy if and only if he is not entire and not gentle.
Sherwin being entire and Jimmy being not stormy imply that Helena is not friendly.
Someone who is not stormy is always not entire.
Jimmy is not compassionate if and only if Arthur is not friendly.
If someone is not entire and stormy, then he is compassionate, and vice versa.
If someone is not entire or compassionate, then he is stormy.
If Katrina is not grotesque, then Helena is compassionate and Arthur is stormy.
It can be concluded that Danna is not gentle once knowing that Arthur is entire.
If there is someone who is either not friendly or not grotesque, then Arthur is not compassionate.
If there is someone who is entire, then Danna is compassionate.
If someone is stormy, then he is gentle, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not compassionate, he is entire and not gentle. | Katrina is not stormy. | neutral |
Katrina is not grotesque.
Arthur is gentle.
Mark is compassionate.
Arthur is not grotesque.
Arthur is not entire.
Jimmy is grotesque.
Helena is not stormy.
Jimmy is gentle.
Jimmy is not stormy.
Danna is gentle.
Katrina is not compassionate.
Helena is grotesque.Someone is friendly and stormy if and only if he is not entire and not gentle.
Sherwin being entire and Jimmy being not stormy imply that Helena is not friendly.
Someone who is not stormy is always not entire.
Jimmy is not compassionate if and only if Arthur is not friendly.
If someone is not entire and stormy, then he is compassionate, and vice versa.
If someone is not entire or compassionate, then he is stormy.
If Katrina is not grotesque, then Helena is compassionate and Arthur is stormy.
It can be concluded that Danna is not gentle once knowing that Arthur is entire.
If there is someone who is either not friendly or not grotesque, then Arthur is not compassionate.
If there is someone who is entire, then Danna is compassionate.
If someone is stormy, then he is gentle, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not compassionate, he is entire and not gentle. | Arthur is stormy. | entailment |
Katrina is not grotesque.
Arthur is gentle.
Mark is compassionate.
Arthur is not grotesque.
Arthur is not entire.
Jimmy is grotesque.
Helena is not stormy.
Jimmy is gentle.
Jimmy is not stormy.
Danna is gentle.
Katrina is not compassionate.
Helena is grotesque.Someone is friendly and stormy if and only if he is not entire and not gentle.
Sherwin being entire and Jimmy being not stormy imply that Helena is not friendly.
Someone who is not stormy is always not entire.
Jimmy is not compassionate if and only if Arthur is not friendly.
If someone is not entire and stormy, then he is compassionate, and vice versa.
If someone is not entire or compassionate, then he is stormy.
If Katrina is not grotesque, then Helena is compassionate and Arthur is stormy.
It can be concluded that Danna is not gentle once knowing that Arthur is entire.
If there is someone who is either not friendly or not grotesque, then Arthur is not compassionate.
If there is someone who is entire, then Danna is compassionate.
If someone is stormy, then he is gentle, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not compassionate, he is entire and not gentle. | Katrina is entire. | entailment |
Katrina is not grotesque.
Arthur is gentle.
Mark is compassionate.
Arthur is not grotesque.
Arthur is not entire.
Jimmy is grotesque.
Helena is not stormy.
Jimmy is gentle.
Jimmy is not stormy.
Danna is gentle.
Katrina is not compassionate.
Helena is grotesque.Someone is friendly and stormy if and only if he is not entire and not gentle.
Sherwin being entire and Jimmy being not stormy imply that Helena is not friendly.
Someone who is not stormy is always not entire.
Jimmy is not compassionate if and only if Arthur is not friendly.
If someone is not entire and stormy, then he is compassionate, and vice versa.
If someone is not entire or compassionate, then he is stormy.
If Katrina is not grotesque, then Helena is compassionate and Arthur is stormy.
It can be concluded that Danna is not gentle once knowing that Arthur is entire.
If there is someone who is either not friendly or not grotesque, then Arthur is not compassionate.
If there is someone who is entire, then Danna is compassionate.
If someone is stormy, then he is gentle, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not compassionate, he is entire and not gentle. | Katrina is friendly. | neutral |
Katrina is not grotesque.
Arthur is gentle.
Mark is compassionate.
Arthur is not grotesque.
Arthur is not entire.
Jimmy is grotesque.
Helena is not stormy.
Jimmy is gentle.
Jimmy is not stormy.
Danna is gentle.
Katrina is not compassionate.
Helena is grotesque.Someone is friendly and stormy if and only if he is not entire and not gentle.
Sherwin being entire and Jimmy being not stormy imply that Helena is not friendly.
Someone who is not stormy is always not entire.
Jimmy is not compassionate if and only if Arthur is not friendly.
If someone is not entire and stormy, then he is compassionate, and vice versa.
If someone is not entire or compassionate, then he is stormy.
If Katrina is not grotesque, then Helena is compassionate and Arthur is stormy.
It can be concluded that Danna is not gentle once knowing that Arthur is entire.
If there is someone who is either not friendly or not grotesque, then Arthur is not compassionate.
If there is someone who is entire, then Danna is compassionate.
If someone is stormy, then he is gentle, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not compassionate, he is entire and not gentle. | Katrina is compassionate. | contradiction |
Katrina is not grotesque.
Arthur is gentle.
Mark is compassionate.
Arthur is not grotesque.
Arthur is not entire.
Jimmy is grotesque.
Helena is not stormy.
Jimmy is gentle.
Jimmy is not stormy.
Danna is gentle.
Katrina is not compassionate.
Helena is grotesque.Someone is friendly and stormy if and only if he is not entire and not gentle.
Sherwin being entire and Jimmy being not stormy imply that Helena is not friendly.
Someone who is not stormy is always not entire.
Jimmy is not compassionate if and only if Arthur is not friendly.
If someone is not entire and stormy, then he is compassionate, and vice versa.
If someone is not entire or compassionate, then he is stormy.
If Katrina is not grotesque, then Helena is compassionate and Arthur is stormy.
It can be concluded that Danna is not gentle once knowing that Arthur is entire.
If there is someone who is either not friendly or not grotesque, then Arthur is not compassionate.
If there is someone who is entire, then Danna is compassionate.
If someone is stormy, then he is gentle, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not compassionate, he is entire and not gentle. | Jimmy is stormy. | self_contradiction |
Katrina is not grotesque.
Arthur is gentle.
Mark is compassionate.
Arthur is not grotesque.
Arthur is not entire.
Jimmy is grotesque.
Helena is not stormy.
Jimmy is gentle.
Jimmy is not stormy.
Danna is gentle.
Katrina is not compassionate.
Helena is grotesque.Someone is friendly and stormy if and only if he is not entire and not gentle.
Sherwin being entire and Jimmy being not stormy imply that Helena is not friendly.
Someone who is not stormy is always not entire.
Jimmy is not compassionate if and only if Arthur is not friendly.
If someone is not entire and stormy, then he is compassionate, and vice versa.
If someone is not entire or compassionate, then he is stormy.
If Katrina is not grotesque, then Helena is compassionate and Arthur is stormy.
It can be concluded that Danna is not gentle once knowing that Arthur is entire.
If there is someone who is either not friendly or not grotesque, then Arthur is not compassionate.
If there is someone who is entire, then Danna is compassionate.
If someone is stormy, then he is gentle, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not compassionate, he is entire and not gentle. | Danna is not entire. | entailment |
Katrina is not grotesque.
Arthur is gentle.
Mark is compassionate.
Arthur is not grotesque.
Arthur is not entire.
Jimmy is grotesque.
Helena is not stormy.
Jimmy is gentle.
Jimmy is not stormy.
Danna is gentle.
Katrina is not compassionate.
Helena is grotesque.Someone is friendly and stormy if and only if he is not entire and not gentle.
Sherwin being entire and Jimmy being not stormy imply that Helena is not friendly.
Someone who is not stormy is always not entire.
Jimmy is not compassionate if and only if Arthur is not friendly.
If someone is not entire and stormy, then he is compassionate, and vice versa.
If someone is not entire or compassionate, then he is stormy.
If Katrina is not grotesque, then Helena is compassionate and Arthur is stormy.
It can be concluded that Danna is not gentle once knowing that Arthur is entire.
If there is someone who is either not friendly or not grotesque, then Arthur is not compassionate.
If there is someone who is entire, then Danna is compassionate.
If someone is stormy, then he is gentle, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not compassionate, he is entire and not gentle. | Sherwin is stormy. | neutral |
Katrina is not grotesque.
Arthur is gentle.
Mark is compassionate.
Arthur is not grotesque.
Arthur is not entire.
Jimmy is grotesque.
Helena is not stormy.
Jimmy is gentle.
Jimmy is not stormy.
Danna is gentle.
Katrina is not compassionate.
Helena is grotesque.Someone is friendly and stormy if and only if he is not entire and not gentle.
Sherwin being entire and Jimmy being not stormy imply that Helena is not friendly.
Someone who is not stormy is always not entire.
Jimmy is not compassionate if and only if Arthur is not friendly.
If someone is not entire and stormy, then he is compassionate, and vice versa.
If someone is not entire or compassionate, then he is stormy.
If Katrina is not grotesque, then Helena is compassionate and Arthur is stormy.
It can be concluded that Danna is not gentle once knowing that Arthur is entire.
If there is someone who is either not friendly or not grotesque, then Arthur is not compassionate.
If there is someone who is entire, then Danna is compassionate.
If someone is stormy, then he is gentle, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not compassionate, he is entire and not gentle. | Helena is entire. | contradiction |
Katrina is not grotesque.
Arthur is gentle.
Mark is compassionate.
Arthur is not grotesque.
Arthur is not entire.
Jimmy is grotesque.
Helena is not stormy.
Jimmy is gentle.
Jimmy is not stormy.
Danna is gentle.
Katrina is not compassionate.
Helena is grotesque.Someone is friendly and stormy if and only if he is not entire and not gentle.
Sherwin being entire and Jimmy being not stormy imply that Helena is not friendly.
Someone who is not stormy is always not entire.
Jimmy is not compassionate if and only if Arthur is not friendly.
If someone is not entire and stormy, then he is compassionate, and vice versa.
If someone is not entire or compassionate, then he is stormy.
If Katrina is not grotesque, then Helena is compassionate and Arthur is stormy.
It can be concluded that Danna is not gentle once knowing that Arthur is entire.
If there is someone who is either not friendly or not grotesque, then Arthur is not compassionate.
If there is someone who is entire, then Danna is compassionate.
If someone is stormy, then he is gentle, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not compassionate, he is entire and not gentle. | Arthur is entire. | self_contradiction |
Katrina is not grotesque.
Arthur is gentle.
Mark is compassionate.
Arthur is not grotesque.
Arthur is not entire.
Jimmy is grotesque.
Helena is not stormy.
Jimmy is gentle.
Jimmy is not stormy.
Danna is gentle.
Katrina is not compassionate.
Helena is grotesque.Someone is friendly and stormy if and only if he is not entire and not gentle.
Sherwin being entire and Jimmy being not stormy imply that Helena is not friendly.
Someone who is not stormy is always not entire.
Jimmy is not compassionate if and only if Arthur is not friendly.
If someone is not entire and stormy, then he is compassionate, and vice versa.
If someone is not entire or compassionate, then he is stormy.
If Katrina is not grotesque, then Helena is compassionate and Arthur is stormy.
It can be concluded that Danna is not gentle once knowing that Arthur is entire.
If there is someone who is either not friendly or not grotesque, then Arthur is not compassionate.
If there is someone who is entire, then Danna is compassionate.
If someone is stormy, then he is gentle, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not compassionate, he is entire and not gentle. | Arthur is not grotesque. | entailment |
Katrina is not grotesque.
Arthur is gentle.
Mark is compassionate.
Arthur is not grotesque.
Arthur is not entire.
Jimmy is grotesque.
Helena is not stormy.
Jimmy is gentle.
Jimmy is not stormy.
Danna is gentle.
Katrina is not compassionate.
Helena is grotesque.Someone is friendly and stormy if and only if he is not entire and not gentle.
Sherwin being entire and Jimmy being not stormy imply that Helena is not friendly.
Someone who is not stormy is always not entire.
Jimmy is not compassionate if and only if Arthur is not friendly.
If someone is not entire and stormy, then he is compassionate, and vice versa.
If someone is not entire or compassionate, then he is stormy.
If Katrina is not grotesque, then Helena is compassionate and Arthur is stormy.
It can be concluded that Danna is not gentle once knowing that Arthur is entire.
If there is someone who is either not friendly or not grotesque, then Arthur is not compassionate.
If there is someone who is entire, then Danna is compassionate.
If someone is stormy, then he is gentle, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not compassionate, he is entire and not gentle. | Jimmy is not compassionate. | contradiction |
Katrina is not grotesque.
Arthur is gentle.
Mark is compassionate.
Arthur is not grotesque.
Arthur is not entire.
Jimmy is grotesque.
Helena is not stormy.
Jimmy is gentle.
Jimmy is not stormy.
Danna is gentle.
Katrina is not compassionate.
Helena is grotesque.Someone is friendly and stormy if and only if he is not entire and not gentle.
Sherwin being entire and Jimmy being not stormy imply that Helena is not friendly.
Someone who is not stormy is always not entire.
Jimmy is not compassionate if and only if Arthur is not friendly.
If someone is not entire and stormy, then he is compassionate, and vice versa.
If someone is not entire or compassionate, then he is stormy.
If Katrina is not grotesque, then Helena is compassionate and Arthur is stormy.
It can be concluded that Danna is not gentle once knowing that Arthur is entire.
If there is someone who is either not friendly or not grotesque, then Arthur is not compassionate.
If there is someone who is entire, then Danna is compassionate.
If someone is stormy, then he is gentle, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not compassionate, he is entire and not gentle. | Katrina is stormy. | neutral |
Katrina is not grotesque.
Arthur is gentle.
Mark is compassionate.
Arthur is not grotesque.
Arthur is not entire.
Jimmy is grotesque.
Helena is not stormy.
Jimmy is gentle.
Jimmy is not stormy.
Danna is gentle.
Katrina is not compassionate.
Helena is grotesque.Someone is friendly and stormy if and only if he is not entire and not gentle.
Sherwin being entire and Jimmy being not stormy imply that Helena is not friendly.
Someone who is not stormy is always not entire.
Jimmy is not compassionate if and only if Arthur is not friendly.
If someone is not entire and stormy, then he is compassionate, and vice versa.
If someone is not entire or compassionate, then he is stormy.
If Katrina is not grotesque, then Helena is compassionate and Arthur is stormy.
It can be concluded that Danna is not gentle once knowing that Arthur is entire.
If there is someone who is either not friendly or not grotesque, then Arthur is not compassionate.
If there is someone who is entire, then Danna is compassionate.
If someone is stormy, then he is gentle, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not compassionate, he is entire and not gentle. | Danna is not gentle. | self_contradiction |
Katrina is not grotesque.
Arthur is gentle.
Mark is compassionate.
Arthur is not grotesque.
Arthur is not entire.
Jimmy is grotesque.
Helena is not stormy.
Jimmy is gentle.
Jimmy is not stormy.
Danna is gentle.
Katrina is not compassionate.
Helena is grotesque.Someone is friendly and stormy if and only if he is not entire and not gentle.
Sherwin being entire and Jimmy being not stormy imply that Helena is not friendly.
Someone who is not stormy is always not entire.
Jimmy is not compassionate if and only if Arthur is not friendly.
If someone is not entire and stormy, then he is compassionate, and vice versa.
If someone is not entire or compassionate, then he is stormy.
If Katrina is not grotesque, then Helena is compassionate and Arthur is stormy.
It can be concluded that Danna is not gentle once knowing that Arthur is entire.
If there is someone who is either not friendly or not grotesque, then Arthur is not compassionate.
If there is someone who is entire, then Danna is compassionate.
If someone is stormy, then he is gentle, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not compassionate, he is entire and not gentle. | Sherwin is not gentle. | neutral |
Katrina is not grotesque.
Arthur is gentle.
Mark is compassionate.
Arthur is not grotesque.
Arthur is not entire.
Jimmy is grotesque.
Helena is not stormy.
Jimmy is gentle.
Jimmy is not stormy.
Danna is gentle.
Katrina is not compassionate.
Helena is grotesque.Someone is friendly and stormy if and only if he is not entire and not gentle.
Sherwin being entire and Jimmy being not stormy imply that Helena is not friendly.
Someone who is not stormy is always not entire.
Jimmy is not compassionate if and only if Arthur is not friendly.
If someone is not entire and stormy, then he is compassionate, and vice versa.
If someone is not entire or compassionate, then he is stormy.
If Katrina is not grotesque, then Helena is compassionate and Arthur is stormy.
It can be concluded that Danna is not gentle once knowing that Arthur is entire.
If there is someone who is either not friendly or not grotesque, then Arthur is not compassionate.
If there is someone who is entire, then Danna is compassionate.
If someone is stormy, then he is gentle, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not compassionate, he is entire and not gentle. | Danna is not friendly. | contradiction |
Katrina is not grotesque.
Arthur is gentle.
Mark is compassionate.
Arthur is not grotesque.
Arthur is not entire.
Jimmy is grotesque.
Helena is not stormy.
Jimmy is gentle.
Jimmy is not stormy.
Danna is gentle.
Katrina is not compassionate.
Helena is grotesque.Someone is friendly and stormy if and only if he is not entire and not gentle.
Sherwin being entire and Jimmy being not stormy imply that Helena is not friendly.
Someone who is not stormy is always not entire.
Jimmy is not compassionate if and only if Arthur is not friendly.
If someone is not entire and stormy, then he is compassionate, and vice versa.
If someone is not entire or compassionate, then he is stormy.
If Katrina is not grotesque, then Helena is compassionate and Arthur is stormy.
It can be concluded that Danna is not gentle once knowing that Arthur is entire.
If there is someone who is either not friendly or not grotesque, then Arthur is not compassionate.
If there is someone who is entire, then Danna is compassionate.
If someone is stormy, then he is gentle, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not compassionate, he is entire and not gentle. | Helena is grotesque. | entailment |
Katrina is not grotesque.
Arthur is gentle.
Mark is compassionate.
Arthur is not grotesque.
Arthur is not entire.
Jimmy is grotesque.
Helena is not stormy.
Jimmy is gentle.
Jimmy is not stormy.
Danna is gentle.
Katrina is not compassionate.
Helena is grotesque.Someone is friendly and stormy if and only if he is not entire and not gentle.
Sherwin being entire and Jimmy being not stormy imply that Helena is not friendly.
Someone who is not stormy is always not entire.
Jimmy is not compassionate if and only if Arthur is not friendly.
If someone is not entire and stormy, then he is compassionate, and vice versa.
If someone is not entire or compassionate, then he is stormy.
If Katrina is not grotesque, then Helena is compassionate and Arthur is stormy.
It can be concluded that Danna is not gentle once knowing that Arthur is entire.
If there is someone who is either not friendly or not grotesque, then Arthur is not compassionate.
If there is someone who is entire, then Danna is compassionate.
If someone is stormy, then he is gentle, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not compassionate, he is entire and not gentle. | Helena is not stormy. | self_contradiction |
Katrina is not grotesque.
Arthur is gentle.
Mark is compassionate.
Arthur is not grotesque.
Arthur is not entire.
Jimmy is grotesque.
Helena is not stormy.
Jimmy is gentle.
Jimmy is not stormy.
Danna is gentle.
Katrina is not compassionate.
Helena is grotesque.Someone is friendly and stormy if and only if he is not entire and not gentle.
Sherwin being entire and Jimmy being not stormy imply that Helena is not friendly.
Someone who is not stormy is always not entire.
Jimmy is not compassionate if and only if Arthur is not friendly.
If someone is not entire and stormy, then he is compassionate, and vice versa.
If someone is not entire or compassionate, then he is stormy.
If Katrina is not grotesque, then Helena is compassionate and Arthur is stormy.
It can be concluded that Danna is not gentle once knowing that Arthur is entire.
If there is someone who is either not friendly or not grotesque, then Arthur is not compassionate.
If there is someone who is entire, then Danna is compassionate.
If someone is stormy, then he is gentle, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not compassionate, he is entire and not gentle. | Danna is gentle. | self_contradiction |
Fred is romantic.
Adrian is cute.
Gilroy is victorious.
Graham is not cute.
Luisa is victorious.
Leith is round.
Graham is not romantic.
Fred is not victorious.
Fred is round.
Leith is not easygoing.
Graham is not easygoing.
Adrian is not tall.As long as someone is not victorious, he is easygoing and not cute.
If there is someone who is round, then Leith is not tall.
If Adrian is tall or Adrian is not romantic, then Hanna is round.
If there is someone who is not easygoing, then Fred is not romantic.
If there is at least one people who is either not tall or not round, then Hanna is not cute and Fred is romantic.
If someone is not round, then he is cute, and vice versa.
Someone who is not round is always not victorious.
If there is at least one people who is tall or not easygoing, then Leith is not cute.
If there is someone who is round, then Gilroy is easygoing.
If there is at least one people who is easygoing, then Leith is not cute and Graham is not victorious.
If there is someone who is round, then Fred is not cute and Graham is romantic.
Fred is cute if and only if Gilroy is not romantic and Adrian is tall. | Graham is not round. | neutral |
Fred is romantic.
Adrian is cute.
Gilroy is victorious.
Graham is not cute.
Luisa is victorious.
Leith is round.
Graham is not romantic.
Fred is not victorious.
Fred is round.
Leith is not easygoing.
Graham is not easygoing.
Adrian is not tall.As long as someone is not victorious, he is easygoing and not cute.
If there is someone who is round, then Leith is not tall.
If Adrian is tall or Adrian is not romantic, then Hanna is round.
If there is someone who is not easygoing, then Fred is not romantic.
If there is at least one people who is either not tall or not round, then Hanna is not cute and Fred is romantic.
If someone is not round, then he is cute, and vice versa.
Someone who is not round is always not victorious.
If there is at least one people who is tall or not easygoing, then Leith is not cute.
If there is someone who is round, then Gilroy is easygoing.
If there is at least one people who is easygoing, then Leith is not cute and Graham is not victorious.
If there is someone who is round, then Fred is not cute and Graham is romantic.
Fred is cute if and only if Gilroy is not romantic and Adrian is tall. | Adrian is not cute. | self_contradiction |
Fred is romantic.
Adrian is cute.
Gilroy is victorious.
Graham is not cute.
Luisa is victorious.
Leith is round.
Graham is not romantic.
Fred is not victorious.
Fred is round.
Leith is not easygoing.
Graham is not easygoing.
Adrian is not tall.As long as someone is not victorious, he is easygoing and not cute.
If there is someone who is round, then Leith is not tall.
If Adrian is tall or Adrian is not romantic, then Hanna is round.
If there is someone who is not easygoing, then Fred is not romantic.
If there is at least one people who is either not tall or not round, then Hanna is not cute and Fred is romantic.
If someone is not round, then he is cute, and vice versa.
Someone who is not round is always not victorious.
If there is at least one people who is tall or not easygoing, then Leith is not cute.
If there is someone who is round, then Gilroy is easygoing.
If there is at least one people who is easygoing, then Leith is not cute and Graham is not victorious.
If there is someone who is round, then Fred is not cute and Graham is romantic.
Fred is cute if and only if Gilroy is not romantic and Adrian is tall. | Adrian is victorious. | contradiction |
Fred is romantic.
Adrian is cute.
Gilroy is victorious.
Graham is not cute.
Luisa is victorious.
Leith is round.
Graham is not romantic.
Fred is not victorious.
Fred is round.
Leith is not easygoing.
Graham is not easygoing.
Adrian is not tall.As long as someone is not victorious, he is easygoing and not cute.
If there is someone who is round, then Leith is not tall.
If Adrian is tall or Adrian is not romantic, then Hanna is round.
If there is someone who is not easygoing, then Fred is not romantic.
If there is at least one people who is either not tall or not round, then Hanna is not cute and Fred is romantic.
If someone is not round, then he is cute, and vice versa.
Someone who is not round is always not victorious.
If there is at least one people who is tall or not easygoing, then Leith is not cute.
If there is someone who is round, then Gilroy is easygoing.
If there is at least one people who is easygoing, then Leith is not cute and Graham is not victorious.
If there is someone who is round, then Fred is not cute and Graham is romantic.
Fred is cute if and only if Gilroy is not romantic and Adrian is tall. | Luisa is victorious. | entailment |
Fred is romantic.
Adrian is cute.
Gilroy is victorious.
Graham is not cute.
Luisa is victorious.
Leith is round.
Graham is not romantic.
Fred is not victorious.
Fred is round.
Leith is not easygoing.
Graham is not easygoing.
Adrian is not tall.As long as someone is not victorious, he is easygoing and not cute.
If there is someone who is round, then Leith is not tall.
If Adrian is tall or Adrian is not romantic, then Hanna is round.
If there is someone who is not easygoing, then Fred is not romantic.
If there is at least one people who is either not tall or not round, then Hanna is not cute and Fred is romantic.
If someone is not round, then he is cute, and vice versa.
Someone who is not round is always not victorious.
If there is at least one people who is tall or not easygoing, then Leith is not cute.
If there is someone who is round, then Gilroy is easygoing.
If there is at least one people who is easygoing, then Leith is not cute and Graham is not victorious.
If there is someone who is round, then Fred is not cute and Graham is romantic.
Fred is cute if and only if Gilroy is not romantic and Adrian is tall. | Gilroy is tall. | neutral |
Fred is romantic.
Adrian is cute.
Gilroy is victorious.
Graham is not cute.
Luisa is victorious.
Leith is round.
Graham is not romantic.
Fred is not victorious.
Fred is round.
Leith is not easygoing.
Graham is not easygoing.
Adrian is not tall.As long as someone is not victorious, he is easygoing and not cute.
If there is someone who is round, then Leith is not tall.
If Adrian is tall or Adrian is not romantic, then Hanna is round.
If there is someone who is not easygoing, then Fred is not romantic.
If there is at least one people who is either not tall or not round, then Hanna is not cute and Fred is romantic.
If someone is not round, then he is cute, and vice versa.
Someone who is not round is always not victorious.
If there is at least one people who is tall or not easygoing, then Leith is not cute.
If there is someone who is round, then Gilroy is easygoing.
If there is at least one people who is easygoing, then Leith is not cute and Graham is not victorious.
If there is someone who is round, then Fred is not cute and Graham is romantic.
Fred is cute if and only if Gilroy is not romantic and Adrian is tall. | Adrian is round. | contradiction |
Fred is romantic.
Adrian is cute.
Gilroy is victorious.
Graham is not cute.
Luisa is victorious.
Leith is round.
Graham is not romantic.
Fred is not victorious.
Fred is round.
Leith is not easygoing.
Graham is not easygoing.
Adrian is not tall.As long as someone is not victorious, he is easygoing and not cute.
If there is someone who is round, then Leith is not tall.
If Adrian is tall or Adrian is not romantic, then Hanna is round.
If there is someone who is not easygoing, then Fred is not romantic.
If there is at least one people who is either not tall or not round, then Hanna is not cute and Fred is romantic.
If someone is not round, then he is cute, and vice versa.
Someone who is not round is always not victorious.
If there is at least one people who is tall or not easygoing, then Leith is not cute.
If there is someone who is round, then Gilroy is easygoing.
If there is at least one people who is easygoing, then Leith is not cute and Graham is not victorious.
If there is someone who is round, then Fred is not cute and Graham is romantic.
Fred is cute if and only if Gilroy is not romantic and Adrian is tall. | Graham is easygoing. | self_contradiction |
Fred is romantic.
Adrian is cute.
Gilroy is victorious.
Graham is not cute.
Luisa is victorious.
Leith is round.
Graham is not romantic.
Fred is not victorious.
Fred is round.
Leith is not easygoing.
Graham is not easygoing.
Adrian is not tall.As long as someone is not victorious, he is easygoing and not cute.
If there is someone who is round, then Leith is not tall.
If Adrian is tall or Adrian is not romantic, then Hanna is round.
If there is someone who is not easygoing, then Fred is not romantic.
If there is at least one people who is either not tall or not round, then Hanna is not cute and Fred is romantic.
If someone is not round, then he is cute, and vice versa.
Someone who is not round is always not victorious.
If there is at least one people who is tall or not easygoing, then Leith is not cute.
If there is someone who is round, then Gilroy is easygoing.
If there is at least one people who is easygoing, then Leith is not cute and Graham is not victorious.
If there is someone who is round, then Fred is not cute and Graham is romantic.
Fred is cute if and only if Gilroy is not romantic and Adrian is tall. | Hanna is victorious. | neutral |
Fred is romantic.
Adrian is cute.
Gilroy is victorious.
Graham is not cute.
Luisa is victorious.
Leith is round.
Graham is not romantic.
Fred is not victorious.
Fred is round.
Leith is not easygoing.
Graham is not easygoing.
Adrian is not tall.As long as someone is not victorious, he is easygoing and not cute.
If there is someone who is round, then Leith is not tall.
If Adrian is tall or Adrian is not romantic, then Hanna is round.
If there is someone who is not easygoing, then Fred is not romantic.
If there is at least one people who is either not tall or not round, then Hanna is not cute and Fred is romantic.
If someone is not round, then he is cute, and vice versa.
Someone who is not round is always not victorious.
If there is at least one people who is tall or not easygoing, then Leith is not cute.
If there is someone who is round, then Gilroy is easygoing.
If there is at least one people who is easygoing, then Leith is not cute and Graham is not victorious.
If there is someone who is round, then Fred is not cute and Graham is romantic.
Fred is cute if and only if Gilroy is not romantic and Adrian is tall. | Fred is not victorious. | entailment |
Fred is romantic.
Adrian is cute.
Gilroy is victorious.
Graham is not cute.
Luisa is victorious.
Leith is round.
Graham is not romantic.
Fred is not victorious.
Fred is round.
Leith is not easygoing.
Graham is not easygoing.
Adrian is not tall.As long as someone is not victorious, he is easygoing and not cute.
If there is someone who is round, then Leith is not tall.
If Adrian is tall or Adrian is not romantic, then Hanna is round.
If there is someone who is not easygoing, then Fred is not romantic.
If there is at least one people who is either not tall or not round, then Hanna is not cute and Fred is romantic.
If someone is not round, then he is cute, and vice versa.
Someone who is not round is always not victorious.
If there is at least one people who is tall or not easygoing, then Leith is not cute.
If there is someone who is round, then Gilroy is easygoing.
If there is at least one people who is easygoing, then Leith is not cute and Graham is not victorious.
If there is someone who is round, then Fred is not cute and Graham is romantic.
Fred is cute if and only if Gilroy is not romantic and Adrian is tall. | Gilroy is not easygoing. | contradiction |
Fred is romantic.
Adrian is cute.
Gilroy is victorious.
Graham is not cute.
Luisa is victorious.
Leith is round.
Graham is not romantic.
Fred is not victorious.
Fred is round.
Leith is not easygoing.
Graham is not easygoing.
Adrian is not tall.As long as someone is not victorious, he is easygoing and not cute.
If there is someone who is round, then Leith is not tall.
If Adrian is tall or Adrian is not romantic, then Hanna is round.
If there is someone who is not easygoing, then Fred is not romantic.
If there is at least one people who is either not tall or not round, then Hanna is not cute and Fred is romantic.
If someone is not round, then he is cute, and vice versa.
Someone who is not round is always not victorious.
If there is at least one people who is tall or not easygoing, then Leith is not cute.
If there is someone who is round, then Gilroy is easygoing.
If there is at least one people who is easygoing, then Leith is not cute and Graham is not victorious.
If there is someone who is round, then Fred is not cute and Graham is romantic.
Fred is cute if and only if Gilroy is not romantic and Adrian is tall. | Adrian is cute. | self_contradiction |
Fred is romantic.
Adrian is cute.
Gilroy is victorious.
Graham is not cute.
Luisa is victorious.
Leith is round.
Graham is not romantic.
Fred is not victorious.
Fred is round.
Leith is not easygoing.
Graham is not easygoing.
Adrian is not tall.As long as someone is not victorious, he is easygoing and not cute.
If there is someone who is round, then Leith is not tall.
If Adrian is tall or Adrian is not romantic, then Hanna is round.
If there is someone who is not easygoing, then Fred is not romantic.
If there is at least one people who is either not tall or not round, then Hanna is not cute and Fred is romantic.
If someone is not round, then he is cute, and vice versa.
Someone who is not round is always not victorious.
If there is at least one people who is tall or not easygoing, then Leith is not cute.
If there is someone who is round, then Gilroy is easygoing.
If there is at least one people who is easygoing, then Leith is not cute and Graham is not victorious.
If there is someone who is round, then Fred is not cute and Graham is romantic.
Fred is cute if and only if Gilroy is not romantic and Adrian is tall. | Fred is not cute. | entailment |
Fred is romantic.
Adrian is cute.
Gilroy is victorious.
Graham is not cute.
Luisa is victorious.
Leith is round.
Graham is not romantic.
Fred is not victorious.
Fred is round.
Leith is not easygoing.
Graham is not easygoing.
Adrian is not tall.As long as someone is not victorious, he is easygoing and not cute.
If there is someone who is round, then Leith is not tall.
If Adrian is tall or Adrian is not romantic, then Hanna is round.
If there is someone who is not easygoing, then Fred is not romantic.
If there is at least one people who is either not tall or not round, then Hanna is not cute and Fred is romantic.
If someone is not round, then he is cute, and vice versa.
Someone who is not round is always not victorious.
If there is at least one people who is tall or not easygoing, then Leith is not cute.
If there is someone who is round, then Gilroy is easygoing.
If there is at least one people who is easygoing, then Leith is not cute and Graham is not victorious.
If there is someone who is round, then Fred is not cute and Graham is romantic.
Fred is cute if and only if Gilroy is not romantic and Adrian is tall. | Fred is cute. | contradiction |
Fred is romantic.
Adrian is cute.
Gilroy is victorious.
Graham is not cute.
Luisa is victorious.
Leith is round.
Graham is not romantic.
Fred is not victorious.
Fred is round.
Leith is not easygoing.
Graham is not easygoing.
Adrian is not tall.As long as someone is not victorious, he is easygoing and not cute.
If there is someone who is round, then Leith is not tall.
If Adrian is tall or Adrian is not romantic, then Hanna is round.
If there is someone who is not easygoing, then Fred is not romantic.
If there is at least one people who is either not tall or not round, then Hanna is not cute and Fred is romantic.
If someone is not round, then he is cute, and vice versa.
Someone who is not round is always not victorious.
If there is at least one people who is tall or not easygoing, then Leith is not cute.
If there is someone who is round, then Gilroy is easygoing.
If there is at least one people who is easygoing, then Leith is not cute and Graham is not victorious.
If there is someone who is round, then Fred is not cute and Graham is romantic.
Fred is cute if and only if Gilroy is not romantic and Adrian is tall. | Fred is not romantic. | self_contradiction |
Fred is romantic.
Adrian is cute.
Gilroy is victorious.
Graham is not cute.
Luisa is victorious.
Leith is round.
Graham is not romantic.
Fred is not victorious.
Fred is round.
Leith is not easygoing.
Graham is not easygoing.
Adrian is not tall.As long as someone is not victorious, he is easygoing and not cute.
If there is someone who is round, then Leith is not tall.
If Adrian is tall or Adrian is not romantic, then Hanna is round.
If there is someone who is not easygoing, then Fred is not romantic.
If there is at least one people who is either not tall or not round, then Hanna is not cute and Fred is romantic.
If someone is not round, then he is cute, and vice versa.
Someone who is not round is always not victorious.
If there is at least one people who is tall or not easygoing, then Leith is not cute.
If there is someone who is round, then Gilroy is easygoing.
If there is at least one people who is easygoing, then Leith is not cute and Graham is not victorious.
If there is someone who is round, then Fred is not cute and Graham is romantic.
Fred is cute if and only if Gilroy is not romantic and Adrian is tall. | Fred is easygoing. | entailment |
Fred is romantic.
Adrian is cute.
Gilroy is victorious.
Graham is not cute.
Luisa is victorious.
Leith is round.
Graham is not romantic.
Fred is not victorious.
Fred is round.
Leith is not easygoing.
Graham is not easygoing.
Adrian is not tall.As long as someone is not victorious, he is easygoing and not cute.
If there is someone who is round, then Leith is not tall.
If Adrian is tall or Adrian is not romantic, then Hanna is round.
If there is someone who is not easygoing, then Fred is not romantic.
If there is at least one people who is either not tall or not round, then Hanna is not cute and Fred is romantic.
If someone is not round, then he is cute, and vice versa.
Someone who is not round is always not victorious.
If there is at least one people who is tall or not easygoing, then Leith is not cute.
If there is someone who is round, then Gilroy is easygoing.
If there is at least one people who is easygoing, then Leith is not cute and Graham is not victorious.
If there is someone who is round, then Fred is not cute and Graham is romantic.
Fred is cute if and only if Gilroy is not romantic and Adrian is tall. | Gilroy is not cute. | neutral |
Fred is romantic.
Adrian is cute.
Gilroy is victorious.
Graham is not cute.
Luisa is victorious.
Leith is round.
Graham is not romantic.
Fred is not victorious.
Fred is round.
Leith is not easygoing.
Graham is not easygoing.
Adrian is not tall.As long as someone is not victorious, he is easygoing and not cute.
If there is someone who is round, then Leith is not tall.
If Adrian is tall or Adrian is not romantic, then Hanna is round.
If there is someone who is not easygoing, then Fred is not romantic.
If there is at least one people who is either not tall or not round, then Hanna is not cute and Fred is romantic.
If someone is not round, then he is cute, and vice versa.
Someone who is not round is always not victorious.
If there is at least one people who is tall or not easygoing, then Leith is not cute.
If there is someone who is round, then Gilroy is easygoing.
If there is at least one people who is easygoing, then Leith is not cute and Graham is not victorious.
If there is someone who is round, then Fred is not cute and Graham is romantic.
Fred is cute if and only if Gilroy is not romantic and Adrian is tall. | Graham is not easygoing. | self_contradiction |
Fred is romantic.
Adrian is cute.
Gilroy is victorious.
Graham is not cute.
Luisa is victorious.
Leith is round.
Graham is not romantic.
Fred is not victorious.
Fred is round.
Leith is not easygoing.
Graham is not easygoing.
Adrian is not tall.As long as someone is not victorious, he is easygoing and not cute.
If there is someone who is round, then Leith is not tall.
If Adrian is tall or Adrian is not romantic, then Hanna is round.
If there is someone who is not easygoing, then Fred is not romantic.
If there is at least one people who is either not tall or not round, then Hanna is not cute and Fred is romantic.
If someone is not round, then he is cute, and vice versa.
Someone who is not round is always not victorious.
If there is at least one people who is tall or not easygoing, then Leith is not cute.
If there is someone who is round, then Gilroy is easygoing.
If there is at least one people who is easygoing, then Leith is not cute and Graham is not victorious.
If there is someone who is round, then Fred is not cute and Graham is romantic.
Fred is cute if and only if Gilroy is not romantic and Adrian is tall. | Luisa is easygoing. | neutral |
Fred is romantic.
Adrian is cute.
Gilroy is victorious.
Graham is not cute.
Luisa is victorious.
Leith is round.
Graham is not romantic.
Fred is not victorious.
Fred is round.
Leith is not easygoing.
Graham is not easygoing.
Adrian is not tall.As long as someone is not victorious, he is easygoing and not cute.
If there is someone who is round, then Leith is not tall.
If Adrian is tall or Adrian is not romantic, then Hanna is round.
If there is someone who is not easygoing, then Fred is not romantic.
If there is at least one people who is either not tall or not round, then Hanna is not cute and Fred is romantic.
If someone is not round, then he is cute, and vice versa.
Someone who is not round is always not victorious.
If there is at least one people who is tall or not easygoing, then Leith is not cute.
If there is someone who is round, then Gilroy is easygoing.
If there is at least one people who is easygoing, then Leith is not cute and Graham is not victorious.
If there is someone who is round, then Fred is not cute and Graham is romantic.
Fred is cute if and only if Gilroy is not romantic and Adrian is tall. | Fred is not round. | contradiction |
Fred is romantic.
Adrian is cute.
Gilroy is victorious.
Graham is not cute.
Luisa is victorious.
Leith is round.
Graham is not romantic.
Fred is not victorious.
Fred is round.
Leith is not easygoing.
Graham is not easygoing.
Adrian is not tall.As long as someone is not victorious, he is easygoing and not cute.
If there is someone who is round, then Leith is not tall.
If Adrian is tall or Adrian is not romantic, then Hanna is round.
If there is someone who is not easygoing, then Fred is not romantic.
If there is at least one people who is either not tall or not round, then Hanna is not cute and Fred is romantic.
If someone is not round, then he is cute, and vice versa.
Someone who is not round is always not victorious.
If there is at least one people who is tall or not easygoing, then Leith is not cute.
If there is someone who is round, then Gilroy is easygoing.
If there is at least one people who is easygoing, then Leith is not cute and Graham is not victorious.
If there is someone who is round, then Fred is not cute and Graham is romantic.
Fred is cute if and only if Gilroy is not romantic and Adrian is tall. | Gilroy is easygoing. | entailment |
Merlin is not hard-working.
Marlon is not cheeky.
Alexis is harsh.
Marlon is excited.
Glen is competitive.
Marlon is not competitive.
Marlon is determined.
Merlin is not competitive.
Laurence is cheeky.
Douglas is hard-working.
Merlin is not harsh.
Morton is not determined.Someone who is cheeky is always both hard-working and determined.
If someone who is not cheeky is also harsh, then he is competitive.
If there is someone who is either not hard-working or determined, then Alexis is cheeky.
Someone who is both cheeky and competitive is always harsh.
Someone being not determined is equivalent to being not hard-working.
If there is someone who is either harsh or cheeky, then Glen is excited and Douglas is determined.
If there is someone who is not determined, then Glen is cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is harsh, then Alexis is determined and Morton is excited.
Laurence being not hard-working implies that Morton is competitive and Laurence is determined.
If someone is hard-working or he is not cheeky, then he is not excited.
If someone is not cheeky, then he is not determined.
As long as someone is not determined and not cheeky, he is not competitive and not harsh. | Laurence is excited. | contradiction |
Merlin is not hard-working.
Marlon is not cheeky.
Alexis is harsh.
Marlon is excited.
Glen is competitive.
Marlon is not competitive.
Marlon is determined.
Merlin is not competitive.
Laurence is cheeky.
Douglas is hard-working.
Merlin is not harsh.
Morton is not determined.Someone who is cheeky is always both hard-working and determined.
If someone who is not cheeky is also harsh, then he is competitive.
If there is someone who is either not hard-working or determined, then Alexis is cheeky.
Someone who is both cheeky and competitive is always harsh.
Someone being not determined is equivalent to being not hard-working.
If there is someone who is either harsh or cheeky, then Glen is excited and Douglas is determined.
If there is someone who is not determined, then Glen is cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is harsh, then Alexis is determined and Morton is excited.
Laurence being not hard-working implies that Morton is competitive and Laurence is determined.
If someone is hard-working or he is not cheeky, then he is not excited.
If someone is not cheeky, then he is not determined.
As long as someone is not determined and not cheeky, he is not competitive and not harsh. | Laurence is not hard-working. | contradiction |
Merlin is not hard-working.
Marlon is not cheeky.
Alexis is harsh.
Marlon is excited.
Glen is competitive.
Marlon is not competitive.
Marlon is determined.
Merlin is not competitive.
Laurence is cheeky.
Douglas is hard-working.
Merlin is not harsh.
Morton is not determined.Someone who is cheeky is always both hard-working and determined.
If someone who is not cheeky is also harsh, then he is competitive.
If there is someone who is either not hard-working or determined, then Alexis is cheeky.
Someone who is both cheeky and competitive is always harsh.
Someone being not determined is equivalent to being not hard-working.
If there is someone who is either harsh or cheeky, then Glen is excited and Douglas is determined.
If there is someone who is not determined, then Glen is cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is harsh, then Alexis is determined and Morton is excited.
Laurence being not hard-working implies that Morton is competitive and Laurence is determined.
If someone is hard-working or he is not cheeky, then he is not excited.
If someone is not cheeky, then he is not determined.
As long as someone is not determined and not cheeky, he is not competitive and not harsh. | Laurence is cheeky. | entailment |
Merlin is not hard-working.
Marlon is not cheeky.
Alexis is harsh.
Marlon is excited.
Glen is competitive.
Marlon is not competitive.
Marlon is determined.
Merlin is not competitive.
Laurence is cheeky.
Douglas is hard-working.
Merlin is not harsh.
Morton is not determined.Someone who is cheeky is always both hard-working and determined.
If someone who is not cheeky is also harsh, then he is competitive.
If there is someone who is either not hard-working or determined, then Alexis is cheeky.
Someone who is both cheeky and competitive is always harsh.
Someone being not determined is equivalent to being not hard-working.
If there is someone who is either harsh or cheeky, then Glen is excited and Douglas is determined.
If there is someone who is not determined, then Glen is cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is harsh, then Alexis is determined and Morton is excited.
Laurence being not hard-working implies that Morton is competitive and Laurence is determined.
If someone is hard-working or he is not cheeky, then he is not excited.
If someone is not cheeky, then he is not determined.
As long as someone is not determined and not cheeky, he is not competitive and not harsh. | Marlon is not excited. | self_contradiction |
Merlin is not hard-working.
Marlon is not cheeky.
Alexis is harsh.
Marlon is excited.
Glen is competitive.
Marlon is not competitive.
Marlon is determined.
Merlin is not competitive.
Laurence is cheeky.
Douglas is hard-working.
Merlin is not harsh.
Morton is not determined.Someone who is cheeky is always both hard-working and determined.
If someone who is not cheeky is also harsh, then he is competitive.
If there is someone who is either not hard-working or determined, then Alexis is cheeky.
Someone who is both cheeky and competitive is always harsh.
Someone being not determined is equivalent to being not hard-working.
If there is someone who is either harsh or cheeky, then Glen is excited and Douglas is determined.
If there is someone who is not determined, then Glen is cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is harsh, then Alexis is determined and Morton is excited.
Laurence being not hard-working implies that Morton is competitive and Laurence is determined.
If someone is hard-working or he is not cheeky, then he is not excited.
If someone is not cheeky, then he is not determined.
As long as someone is not determined and not cheeky, he is not competitive and not harsh. | Marlon is not cheeky. | entailment |
Merlin is not hard-working.
Marlon is not cheeky.
Alexis is harsh.
Marlon is excited.
Glen is competitive.
Marlon is not competitive.
Marlon is determined.
Merlin is not competitive.
Laurence is cheeky.
Douglas is hard-working.
Merlin is not harsh.
Morton is not determined.Someone who is cheeky is always both hard-working and determined.
If someone who is not cheeky is also harsh, then he is competitive.
If there is someone who is either not hard-working or determined, then Alexis is cheeky.
Someone who is both cheeky and competitive is always harsh.
Someone being not determined is equivalent to being not hard-working.
If there is someone who is either harsh or cheeky, then Glen is excited and Douglas is determined.
If there is someone who is not determined, then Glen is cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is harsh, then Alexis is determined and Morton is excited.
Laurence being not hard-working implies that Morton is competitive and Laurence is determined.
If someone is hard-working or he is not cheeky, then he is not excited.
If someone is not cheeky, then he is not determined.
As long as someone is not determined and not cheeky, he is not competitive and not harsh. | Morton is not competitive. | neutral |
Merlin is not hard-working.
Marlon is not cheeky.
Alexis is harsh.
Marlon is excited.
Glen is competitive.
Marlon is not competitive.
Marlon is determined.
Merlin is not competitive.
Laurence is cheeky.
Douglas is hard-working.
Merlin is not harsh.
Morton is not determined.Someone who is cheeky is always both hard-working and determined.
If someone who is not cheeky is also harsh, then he is competitive.
If there is someone who is either not hard-working or determined, then Alexis is cheeky.
Someone who is both cheeky and competitive is always harsh.
Someone being not determined is equivalent to being not hard-working.
If there is someone who is either harsh or cheeky, then Glen is excited and Douglas is determined.
If there is someone who is not determined, then Glen is cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is harsh, then Alexis is determined and Morton is excited.
Laurence being not hard-working implies that Morton is competitive and Laurence is determined.
If someone is hard-working or he is not cheeky, then he is not excited.
If someone is not cheeky, then he is not determined.
As long as someone is not determined and not cheeky, he is not competitive and not harsh. | Morton is determined. | contradiction |
Merlin is not hard-working.
Marlon is not cheeky.
Alexis is harsh.
Marlon is excited.
Glen is competitive.
Marlon is not competitive.
Marlon is determined.
Merlin is not competitive.
Laurence is cheeky.
Douglas is hard-working.
Merlin is not harsh.
Morton is not determined.Someone who is cheeky is always both hard-working and determined.
If someone who is not cheeky is also harsh, then he is competitive.
If there is someone who is either not hard-working or determined, then Alexis is cheeky.
Someone who is both cheeky and competitive is always harsh.
Someone being not determined is equivalent to being not hard-working.
If there is someone who is either harsh or cheeky, then Glen is excited and Douglas is determined.
If there is someone who is not determined, then Glen is cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is harsh, then Alexis is determined and Morton is excited.
Laurence being not hard-working implies that Morton is competitive and Laurence is determined.
If someone is hard-working or he is not cheeky, then he is not excited.
If someone is not cheeky, then he is not determined.
As long as someone is not determined and not cheeky, he is not competitive and not harsh. | Glen is excited. | self_contradiction |
Merlin is not hard-working.
Marlon is not cheeky.
Alexis is harsh.
Marlon is excited.
Glen is competitive.
Marlon is not competitive.
Marlon is determined.
Merlin is not competitive.
Laurence is cheeky.
Douglas is hard-working.
Merlin is not harsh.
Morton is not determined.Someone who is cheeky is always both hard-working and determined.
If someone who is not cheeky is also harsh, then he is competitive.
If there is someone who is either not hard-working or determined, then Alexis is cheeky.
Someone who is both cheeky and competitive is always harsh.
Someone being not determined is equivalent to being not hard-working.
If there is someone who is either harsh or cheeky, then Glen is excited and Douglas is determined.
If there is someone who is not determined, then Glen is cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is harsh, then Alexis is determined and Morton is excited.
Laurence being not hard-working implies that Morton is competitive and Laurence is determined.
If someone is hard-working or he is not cheeky, then he is not excited.
If someone is not cheeky, then he is not determined.
As long as someone is not determined and not cheeky, he is not competitive and not harsh. | Douglas is cheeky. | neutral |
Merlin is not hard-working.
Marlon is not cheeky.
Alexis is harsh.
Marlon is excited.
Glen is competitive.
Marlon is not competitive.
Marlon is determined.
Merlin is not competitive.
Laurence is cheeky.
Douglas is hard-working.
Merlin is not harsh.
Morton is not determined.Someone who is cheeky is always both hard-working and determined.
If someone who is not cheeky is also harsh, then he is competitive.
If there is someone who is either not hard-working or determined, then Alexis is cheeky.
Someone who is both cheeky and competitive is always harsh.
Someone being not determined is equivalent to being not hard-working.
If there is someone who is either harsh or cheeky, then Glen is excited and Douglas is determined.
If there is someone who is not determined, then Glen is cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is harsh, then Alexis is determined and Morton is excited.
Laurence being not hard-working implies that Morton is competitive and Laurence is determined.
If someone is hard-working or he is not cheeky, then he is not excited.
If someone is not cheeky, then he is not determined.
As long as someone is not determined and not cheeky, he is not competitive and not harsh. | Morton is not determined. | entailment |
Merlin is not hard-working.
Marlon is not cheeky.
Alexis is harsh.
Marlon is excited.
Glen is competitive.
Marlon is not competitive.
Marlon is determined.
Merlin is not competitive.
Laurence is cheeky.
Douglas is hard-working.
Merlin is not harsh.
Morton is not determined.Someone who is cheeky is always both hard-working and determined.
If someone who is not cheeky is also harsh, then he is competitive.
If there is someone who is either not hard-working or determined, then Alexis is cheeky.
Someone who is both cheeky and competitive is always harsh.
Someone being not determined is equivalent to being not hard-working.
If there is someone who is either harsh or cheeky, then Glen is excited and Douglas is determined.
If there is someone who is not determined, then Glen is cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is harsh, then Alexis is determined and Morton is excited.
Laurence being not hard-working implies that Morton is competitive and Laurence is determined.
If someone is hard-working or he is not cheeky, then he is not excited.
If someone is not cheeky, then he is not determined.
As long as someone is not determined and not cheeky, he is not competitive and not harsh. | Morton is not harsh. | neutral |
Merlin is not hard-working.
Marlon is not cheeky.
Alexis is harsh.
Marlon is excited.
Glen is competitive.
Marlon is not competitive.
Marlon is determined.
Merlin is not competitive.
Laurence is cheeky.
Douglas is hard-working.
Merlin is not harsh.
Morton is not determined.Someone who is cheeky is always both hard-working and determined.
If someone who is not cheeky is also harsh, then he is competitive.
If there is someone who is either not hard-working or determined, then Alexis is cheeky.
Someone who is both cheeky and competitive is always harsh.
Someone being not determined is equivalent to being not hard-working.
If there is someone who is either harsh or cheeky, then Glen is excited and Douglas is determined.
If there is someone who is not determined, then Glen is cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is harsh, then Alexis is determined and Morton is excited.
Laurence being not hard-working implies that Morton is competitive and Laurence is determined.
If someone is hard-working or he is not cheeky, then he is not excited.
If someone is not cheeky, then he is not determined.
As long as someone is not determined and not cheeky, he is not competitive and not harsh. | Alexis is not cheeky. | contradiction |
Merlin is not hard-working.
Marlon is not cheeky.
Alexis is harsh.
Marlon is excited.
Glen is competitive.
Marlon is not competitive.
Marlon is determined.
Merlin is not competitive.
Laurence is cheeky.
Douglas is hard-working.
Merlin is not harsh.
Morton is not determined.Someone who is cheeky is always both hard-working and determined.
If someone who is not cheeky is also harsh, then he is competitive.
If there is someone who is either not hard-working or determined, then Alexis is cheeky.
Someone who is both cheeky and competitive is always harsh.
Someone being not determined is equivalent to being not hard-working.
If there is someone who is either harsh or cheeky, then Glen is excited and Douglas is determined.
If there is someone who is not determined, then Glen is cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is harsh, then Alexis is determined and Morton is excited.
Laurence being not hard-working implies that Morton is competitive and Laurence is determined.
If someone is hard-working or he is not cheeky, then he is not excited.
If someone is not cheeky, then he is not determined.
As long as someone is not determined and not cheeky, he is not competitive and not harsh. | Glen is hard-working. | entailment |
Merlin is not hard-working.
Marlon is not cheeky.
Alexis is harsh.
Marlon is excited.
Glen is competitive.
Marlon is not competitive.
Marlon is determined.
Merlin is not competitive.
Laurence is cheeky.
Douglas is hard-working.
Merlin is not harsh.
Morton is not determined.Someone who is cheeky is always both hard-working and determined.
If someone who is not cheeky is also harsh, then he is competitive.
If there is someone who is either not hard-working or determined, then Alexis is cheeky.
Someone who is both cheeky and competitive is always harsh.
Someone being not determined is equivalent to being not hard-working.
If there is someone who is either harsh or cheeky, then Glen is excited and Douglas is determined.
If there is someone who is not determined, then Glen is cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is harsh, then Alexis is determined and Morton is excited.
Laurence being not hard-working implies that Morton is competitive and Laurence is determined.
If someone is hard-working or he is not cheeky, then he is not excited.
If someone is not cheeky, then he is not determined.
As long as someone is not determined and not cheeky, he is not competitive and not harsh. | Marlon is excited. | self_contradiction |
Merlin is not hard-working.
Marlon is not cheeky.
Alexis is harsh.
Marlon is excited.
Glen is competitive.
Marlon is not competitive.
Marlon is determined.
Merlin is not competitive.
Laurence is cheeky.
Douglas is hard-working.
Merlin is not harsh.
Morton is not determined.Someone who is cheeky is always both hard-working and determined.
If someone who is not cheeky is also harsh, then he is competitive.
If there is someone who is either not hard-working or determined, then Alexis is cheeky.
Someone who is both cheeky and competitive is always harsh.
Someone being not determined is equivalent to being not hard-working.
If there is someone who is either harsh or cheeky, then Glen is excited and Douglas is determined.
If there is someone who is not determined, then Glen is cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is harsh, then Alexis is determined and Morton is excited.
Laurence being not hard-working implies that Morton is competitive and Laurence is determined.
If someone is hard-working or he is not cheeky, then he is not excited.
If someone is not cheeky, then he is not determined.
As long as someone is not determined and not cheeky, he is not competitive and not harsh. | Alexis is excited. | contradiction |
Merlin is not hard-working.
Marlon is not cheeky.
Alexis is harsh.
Marlon is excited.
Glen is competitive.
Marlon is not competitive.
Marlon is determined.
Merlin is not competitive.
Laurence is cheeky.
Douglas is hard-working.
Merlin is not harsh.
Morton is not determined.Someone who is cheeky is always both hard-working and determined.
If someone who is not cheeky is also harsh, then he is competitive.
If there is someone who is either not hard-working or determined, then Alexis is cheeky.
Someone who is both cheeky and competitive is always harsh.
Someone being not determined is equivalent to being not hard-working.
If there is someone who is either harsh or cheeky, then Glen is excited and Douglas is determined.
If there is someone who is not determined, then Glen is cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is harsh, then Alexis is determined and Morton is excited.
Laurence being not hard-working implies that Morton is competitive and Laurence is determined.
If someone is hard-working or he is not cheeky, then he is not excited.
If someone is not cheeky, then he is not determined.
As long as someone is not determined and not cheeky, he is not competitive and not harsh. | Morton is harsh. | neutral |
Merlin is not hard-working.
Marlon is not cheeky.
Alexis is harsh.
Marlon is excited.
Glen is competitive.
Marlon is not competitive.
Marlon is determined.
Merlin is not competitive.
Laurence is cheeky.
Douglas is hard-working.
Merlin is not harsh.
Morton is not determined.Someone who is cheeky is always both hard-working and determined.
If someone who is not cheeky is also harsh, then he is competitive.
If there is someone who is either not hard-working or determined, then Alexis is cheeky.
Someone who is both cheeky and competitive is always harsh.
Someone being not determined is equivalent to being not hard-working.
If there is someone who is either harsh or cheeky, then Glen is excited and Douglas is determined.
If there is someone who is not determined, then Glen is cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is harsh, then Alexis is determined and Morton is excited.
Laurence being not hard-working implies that Morton is competitive and Laurence is determined.
If someone is hard-working or he is not cheeky, then he is not excited.
If someone is not cheeky, then he is not determined.
As long as someone is not determined and not cheeky, he is not competitive and not harsh. | Glen is determined. | entailment |
Merlin is not hard-working.
Marlon is not cheeky.
Alexis is harsh.
Marlon is excited.
Glen is competitive.
Marlon is not competitive.
Marlon is determined.
Merlin is not competitive.
Laurence is cheeky.
Douglas is hard-working.
Merlin is not harsh.
Morton is not determined.Someone who is cheeky is always both hard-working and determined.
If someone who is not cheeky is also harsh, then he is competitive.
If there is someone who is either not hard-working or determined, then Alexis is cheeky.
Someone who is both cheeky and competitive is always harsh.
Someone being not determined is equivalent to being not hard-working.
If there is someone who is either harsh or cheeky, then Glen is excited and Douglas is determined.
If there is someone who is not determined, then Glen is cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is harsh, then Alexis is determined and Morton is excited.
Laurence being not hard-working implies that Morton is competitive and Laurence is determined.
If someone is hard-working or he is not cheeky, then he is not excited.
If someone is not cheeky, then he is not determined.
As long as someone is not determined and not cheeky, he is not competitive and not harsh. | Glen is not excited. | self_contradiction |
Merlin is not hard-working.
Marlon is not cheeky.
Alexis is harsh.
Marlon is excited.
Glen is competitive.
Marlon is not competitive.
Marlon is determined.
Merlin is not competitive.
Laurence is cheeky.
Douglas is hard-working.
Merlin is not harsh.
Morton is not determined.Someone who is cheeky is always both hard-working and determined.
If someone who is not cheeky is also harsh, then he is competitive.
If there is someone who is either not hard-working or determined, then Alexis is cheeky.
Someone who is both cheeky and competitive is always harsh.
Someone being not determined is equivalent to being not hard-working.
If there is someone who is either harsh or cheeky, then Glen is excited and Douglas is determined.
If there is someone who is not determined, then Glen is cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is harsh, then Alexis is determined and Morton is excited.
Laurence being not hard-working implies that Morton is competitive and Laurence is determined.
If someone is hard-working or he is not cheeky, then he is not excited.
If someone is not cheeky, then he is not determined.
As long as someone is not determined and not cheeky, he is not competitive and not harsh. | Marlon is not determined. | self_contradiction |
Merlin is not hard-working.
Marlon is not cheeky.
Alexis is harsh.
Marlon is excited.
Glen is competitive.
Marlon is not competitive.
Marlon is determined.
Merlin is not competitive.
Laurence is cheeky.
Douglas is hard-working.
Merlin is not harsh.
Morton is not determined.Someone who is cheeky is always both hard-working and determined.
If someone who is not cheeky is also harsh, then he is competitive.
If there is someone who is either not hard-working or determined, then Alexis is cheeky.
Someone who is both cheeky and competitive is always harsh.
Someone being not determined is equivalent to being not hard-working.
If there is someone who is either harsh or cheeky, then Glen is excited and Douglas is determined.
If there is someone who is not determined, then Glen is cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is harsh, then Alexis is determined and Morton is excited.
Laurence being not hard-working implies that Morton is competitive and Laurence is determined.
If someone is hard-working or he is not cheeky, then he is not excited.
If someone is not cheeky, then he is not determined.
As long as someone is not determined and not cheeky, he is not competitive and not harsh. | Douglas is not harsh. | neutral |
Homer is beautiful.
Culver is not orange.
Culver is wet.
Homer is orange.
Bert is wet.
Hunter is orange.
Bert is not beautiful.
Curt is attractive.
Hunter is not tough.
Hunter is not attractive.
Culver is tough.
Curt is beautiful.Someone who is not attractive is always not wet.
If Bowen is tough or Hunter is beautiful, then Homer is not attractive.
Homer is not wet if and only if Hunter is beautiful and Culver is not orange.
If someone is orange, then he is not wet, and vice versa.
If Bert is wet or Curt is stormy, then Hunter is not orange.
Someone is tough and orange if and only if he is not beautiful.
Homer is stormy if and only if Curt is not wet.
Homer is not stormy if and only if Homer is not tough and Culver is not beautiful.
Someone is stormy and not wet if and only if he is not attractive and not tough.
If someone is stormy or he is tough, then he is not orange.
If there is someone who is both wet and attractive, then Bowen is beautiful.
If Culver is beautiful and Bowen is orange, then Culver is not stormy. | Bowen is not attractive. | neutral |
Homer is beautiful.
Culver is not orange.
Culver is wet.
Homer is orange.
Bert is wet.
Hunter is orange.
Bert is not beautiful.
Curt is attractive.
Hunter is not tough.
Hunter is not attractive.
Culver is tough.
Curt is beautiful.Someone who is not attractive is always not wet.
If Bowen is tough or Hunter is beautiful, then Homer is not attractive.
Homer is not wet if and only if Hunter is beautiful and Culver is not orange.
If someone is orange, then he is not wet, and vice versa.
If Bert is wet or Curt is stormy, then Hunter is not orange.
Someone is tough and orange if and only if he is not beautiful.
Homer is stormy if and only if Curt is not wet.
Homer is not stormy if and only if Homer is not tough and Culver is not beautiful.
Someone is stormy and not wet if and only if he is not attractive and not tough.
If someone is stormy or he is tough, then he is not orange.
If there is someone who is both wet and attractive, then Bowen is beautiful.
If Culver is beautiful and Bowen is orange, then Culver is not stormy. | Bert is tough. | entailment |
Homer is beautiful.
Culver is not orange.
Culver is wet.
Homer is orange.
Bert is wet.
Hunter is orange.
Bert is not beautiful.
Curt is attractive.
Hunter is not tough.
Hunter is not attractive.
Culver is tough.
Curt is beautiful.Someone who is not attractive is always not wet.
If Bowen is tough or Hunter is beautiful, then Homer is not attractive.
Homer is not wet if and only if Hunter is beautiful and Culver is not orange.
If someone is orange, then he is not wet, and vice versa.
If Bert is wet or Curt is stormy, then Hunter is not orange.
Someone is tough and orange if and only if he is not beautiful.
Homer is stormy if and only if Curt is not wet.
Homer is not stormy if and only if Homer is not tough and Culver is not beautiful.
Someone is stormy and not wet if and only if he is not attractive and not tough.
If someone is stormy or he is tough, then he is not orange.
If there is someone who is both wet and attractive, then Bowen is beautiful.
If Culver is beautiful and Bowen is orange, then Culver is not stormy. | Culver is orange. | contradiction |
Homer is beautiful.
Culver is not orange.
Culver is wet.
Homer is orange.
Bert is wet.
Hunter is orange.
Bert is not beautiful.
Curt is attractive.
Hunter is not tough.
Hunter is not attractive.
Culver is tough.
Curt is beautiful.Someone who is not attractive is always not wet.
If Bowen is tough or Hunter is beautiful, then Homer is not attractive.
Homer is not wet if and only if Hunter is beautiful and Culver is not orange.
If someone is orange, then he is not wet, and vice versa.
If Bert is wet or Curt is stormy, then Hunter is not orange.
Someone is tough and orange if and only if he is not beautiful.
Homer is stormy if and only if Curt is not wet.
Homer is not stormy if and only if Homer is not tough and Culver is not beautiful.
Someone is stormy and not wet if and only if he is not attractive and not tough.
If someone is stormy or he is tough, then he is not orange.
If there is someone who is both wet and attractive, then Bowen is beautiful.
If Culver is beautiful and Bowen is orange, then Culver is not stormy. | Bert is stormy. | neutral |
Homer is beautiful.
Culver is not orange.
Culver is wet.
Homer is orange.
Bert is wet.
Hunter is orange.
Bert is not beautiful.
Curt is attractive.
Hunter is not tough.
Hunter is not attractive.
Culver is tough.
Curt is beautiful.Someone who is not attractive is always not wet.
If Bowen is tough or Hunter is beautiful, then Homer is not attractive.
Homer is not wet if and only if Hunter is beautiful and Culver is not orange.
If someone is orange, then he is not wet, and vice versa.
If Bert is wet or Curt is stormy, then Hunter is not orange.
Someone is tough and orange if and only if he is not beautiful.
Homer is stormy if and only if Curt is not wet.
Homer is not stormy if and only if Homer is not tough and Culver is not beautiful.
Someone is stormy and not wet if and only if he is not attractive and not tough.
If someone is stormy or he is tough, then he is not orange.
If there is someone who is both wet and attractive, then Bowen is beautiful.
If Culver is beautiful and Bowen is orange, then Culver is not stormy. | Corwin is orange. | neutral |
Homer is beautiful.
Culver is not orange.
Culver is wet.
Homer is orange.
Bert is wet.
Hunter is orange.
Bert is not beautiful.
Curt is attractive.
Hunter is not tough.
Hunter is not attractive.
Culver is tough.
Curt is beautiful.Someone who is not attractive is always not wet.
If Bowen is tough or Hunter is beautiful, then Homer is not attractive.
Homer is not wet if and only if Hunter is beautiful and Culver is not orange.
If someone is orange, then he is not wet, and vice versa.
If Bert is wet or Curt is stormy, then Hunter is not orange.
Someone is tough and orange if and only if he is not beautiful.
Homer is stormy if and only if Curt is not wet.
Homer is not stormy if and only if Homer is not tough and Culver is not beautiful.
Someone is stormy and not wet if and only if he is not attractive and not tough.
If someone is stormy or he is tough, then he is not orange.
If there is someone who is both wet and attractive, then Bowen is beautiful.
If Culver is beautiful and Bowen is orange, then Culver is not stormy. | Culver is not tough. | contradiction |
Homer is beautiful.
Culver is not orange.
Culver is wet.
Homer is orange.
Bert is wet.
Hunter is orange.
Bert is not beautiful.
Curt is attractive.
Hunter is not tough.
Hunter is not attractive.
Culver is tough.
Curt is beautiful.Someone who is not attractive is always not wet.
If Bowen is tough or Hunter is beautiful, then Homer is not attractive.
Homer is not wet if and only if Hunter is beautiful and Culver is not orange.
If someone is orange, then he is not wet, and vice versa.
If Bert is wet or Curt is stormy, then Hunter is not orange.
Someone is tough and orange if and only if he is not beautiful.
Homer is stormy if and only if Curt is not wet.
Homer is not stormy if and only if Homer is not tough and Culver is not beautiful.
Someone is stormy and not wet if and only if he is not attractive and not tough.
If someone is stormy or he is tough, then he is not orange.
If there is someone who is both wet and attractive, then Bowen is beautiful.
If Culver is beautiful and Bowen is orange, then Culver is not stormy. | Bert is not orange. | self_contradiction |
Homer is beautiful.
Culver is not orange.
Culver is wet.
Homer is orange.
Bert is wet.
Hunter is orange.
Bert is not beautiful.
Curt is attractive.
Hunter is not tough.
Hunter is not attractive.
Culver is tough.
Curt is beautiful.Someone who is not attractive is always not wet.
If Bowen is tough or Hunter is beautiful, then Homer is not attractive.
Homer is not wet if and only if Hunter is beautiful and Culver is not orange.
If someone is orange, then he is not wet, and vice versa.
If Bert is wet or Curt is stormy, then Hunter is not orange.
Someone is tough and orange if and only if he is not beautiful.
Homer is stormy if and only if Curt is not wet.
Homer is not stormy if and only if Homer is not tough and Culver is not beautiful.
Someone is stormy and not wet if and only if he is not attractive and not tough.
If someone is stormy or he is tough, then he is not orange.
If there is someone who is both wet and attractive, then Bowen is beautiful.
If Culver is beautiful and Bowen is orange, then Culver is not stormy. | Homer is not orange. | contradiction |
Homer is beautiful.
Culver is not orange.
Culver is wet.
Homer is orange.
Bert is wet.
Hunter is orange.
Bert is not beautiful.
Curt is attractive.
Hunter is not tough.
Hunter is not attractive.
Culver is tough.
Curt is beautiful.Someone who is not attractive is always not wet.
If Bowen is tough or Hunter is beautiful, then Homer is not attractive.
Homer is not wet if and only if Hunter is beautiful and Culver is not orange.
If someone is orange, then he is not wet, and vice versa.
If Bert is wet or Curt is stormy, then Hunter is not orange.
Someone is tough and orange if and only if he is not beautiful.
Homer is stormy if and only if Curt is not wet.
Homer is not stormy if and only if Homer is not tough and Culver is not beautiful.
Someone is stormy and not wet if and only if he is not attractive and not tough.
If someone is stormy or he is tough, then he is not orange.
If there is someone who is both wet and attractive, then Bowen is beautiful.
If Culver is beautiful and Bowen is orange, then Culver is not stormy. | Hunter is stormy. | entailment |
Homer is beautiful.
Culver is not orange.
Culver is wet.
Homer is orange.
Bert is wet.
Hunter is orange.
Bert is not beautiful.
Curt is attractive.
Hunter is not tough.
Hunter is not attractive.
Culver is tough.
Curt is beautiful.Someone who is not attractive is always not wet.
If Bowen is tough or Hunter is beautiful, then Homer is not attractive.
Homer is not wet if and only if Hunter is beautiful and Culver is not orange.
If someone is orange, then he is not wet, and vice versa.
If Bert is wet or Curt is stormy, then Hunter is not orange.
Someone is tough and orange if and only if he is not beautiful.
Homer is stormy if and only if Curt is not wet.
Homer is not stormy if and only if Homer is not tough and Culver is not beautiful.
Someone is stormy and not wet if and only if he is not attractive and not tough.
If someone is stormy or he is tough, then he is not orange.
If there is someone who is both wet and attractive, then Bowen is beautiful.
If Culver is beautiful and Bowen is orange, then Culver is not stormy. | Homer is beautiful. | entailment |
Homer is beautiful.
Culver is not orange.
Culver is wet.
Homer is orange.
Bert is wet.
Hunter is orange.
Bert is not beautiful.
Curt is attractive.
Hunter is not tough.
Hunter is not attractive.
Culver is tough.
Curt is beautiful.Someone who is not attractive is always not wet.
If Bowen is tough or Hunter is beautiful, then Homer is not attractive.
Homer is not wet if and only if Hunter is beautiful and Culver is not orange.
If someone is orange, then he is not wet, and vice versa.
If Bert is wet or Curt is stormy, then Hunter is not orange.
Someone is tough and orange if and only if he is not beautiful.
Homer is stormy if and only if Curt is not wet.
Homer is not stormy if and only if Homer is not tough and Culver is not beautiful.
Someone is stormy and not wet if and only if he is not attractive and not tough.
If someone is stormy or he is tough, then he is not orange.
If there is someone who is both wet and attractive, then Bowen is beautiful.
If Culver is beautiful and Bowen is orange, then Culver is not stormy. | Hunter is tough. | contradiction |
Homer is beautiful.
Culver is not orange.
Culver is wet.
Homer is orange.
Bert is wet.
Hunter is orange.
Bert is not beautiful.
Curt is attractive.
Hunter is not tough.
Hunter is not attractive.
Culver is tough.
Curt is beautiful.Someone who is not attractive is always not wet.
If Bowen is tough or Hunter is beautiful, then Homer is not attractive.
Homer is not wet if and only if Hunter is beautiful and Culver is not orange.
If someone is orange, then he is not wet, and vice versa.
If Bert is wet or Curt is stormy, then Hunter is not orange.
Someone is tough and orange if and only if he is not beautiful.
Homer is stormy if and only if Curt is not wet.
Homer is not stormy if and only if Homer is not tough and Culver is not beautiful.
Someone is stormy and not wet if and only if he is not attractive and not tough.
If someone is stormy or he is tough, then he is not orange.
If there is someone who is both wet and attractive, then Bowen is beautiful.
If Culver is beautiful and Bowen is orange, then Culver is not stormy. | Homer is stormy. | neutral |
Homer is beautiful.
Culver is not orange.
Culver is wet.
Homer is orange.
Bert is wet.
Hunter is orange.
Bert is not beautiful.
Curt is attractive.
Hunter is not tough.
Hunter is not attractive.
Culver is tough.
Curt is beautiful.Someone who is not attractive is always not wet.
If Bowen is tough or Hunter is beautiful, then Homer is not attractive.
Homer is not wet if and only if Hunter is beautiful and Culver is not orange.
If someone is orange, then he is not wet, and vice versa.
If Bert is wet or Curt is stormy, then Hunter is not orange.
Someone is tough and orange if and only if he is not beautiful.
Homer is stormy if and only if Curt is not wet.
Homer is not stormy if and only if Homer is not tough and Culver is not beautiful.
Someone is stormy and not wet if and only if he is not attractive and not tough.
If someone is stormy or he is tough, then he is not orange.
If there is someone who is both wet and attractive, then Bowen is beautiful.
If Culver is beautiful and Bowen is orange, then Culver is not stormy. | Hunter is not orange. | self_contradiction |
Homer is beautiful.
Culver is not orange.
Culver is wet.
Homer is orange.
Bert is wet.
Hunter is orange.
Bert is not beautiful.
Curt is attractive.
Hunter is not tough.
Hunter is not attractive.
Culver is tough.
Curt is beautiful.Someone who is not attractive is always not wet.
If Bowen is tough or Hunter is beautiful, then Homer is not attractive.
Homer is not wet if and only if Hunter is beautiful and Culver is not orange.
If someone is orange, then he is not wet, and vice versa.
If Bert is wet or Curt is stormy, then Hunter is not orange.
Someone is tough and orange if and only if he is not beautiful.
Homer is stormy if and only if Curt is not wet.
Homer is not stormy if and only if Homer is not tough and Culver is not beautiful.
Someone is stormy and not wet if and only if he is not attractive and not tough.
If someone is stormy or he is tough, then he is not orange.
If there is someone who is both wet and attractive, then Bowen is beautiful.
If Culver is beautiful and Bowen is orange, then Culver is not stormy. | Curt is orange. | neutral |
Homer is beautiful.
Culver is not orange.
Culver is wet.
Homer is orange.
Bert is wet.
Hunter is orange.
Bert is not beautiful.
Curt is attractive.
Hunter is not tough.
Hunter is not attractive.
Culver is tough.
Curt is beautiful.Someone who is not attractive is always not wet.
If Bowen is tough or Hunter is beautiful, then Homer is not attractive.
Homer is not wet if and only if Hunter is beautiful and Culver is not orange.
If someone is orange, then he is not wet, and vice versa.
If Bert is wet or Curt is stormy, then Hunter is not orange.
Someone is tough and orange if and only if he is not beautiful.
Homer is stormy if and only if Curt is not wet.
Homer is not stormy if and only if Homer is not tough and Culver is not beautiful.
Someone is stormy and not wet if and only if he is not attractive and not tough.
If someone is stormy or he is tough, then he is not orange.
If there is someone who is both wet and attractive, then Bowen is beautiful.
If Culver is beautiful and Bowen is orange, then Culver is not stormy. | Bert is not wet. | self_contradiction |
Homer is beautiful.
Culver is not orange.
Culver is wet.
Homer is orange.
Bert is wet.
Hunter is orange.
Bert is not beautiful.
Curt is attractive.
Hunter is not tough.
Hunter is not attractive.
Culver is tough.
Curt is beautiful.Someone who is not attractive is always not wet.
If Bowen is tough or Hunter is beautiful, then Homer is not attractive.
Homer is not wet if and only if Hunter is beautiful and Culver is not orange.
If someone is orange, then he is not wet, and vice versa.
If Bert is wet or Curt is stormy, then Hunter is not orange.
Someone is tough and orange if and only if he is not beautiful.
Homer is stormy if and only if Curt is not wet.
Homer is not stormy if and only if Homer is not tough and Culver is not beautiful.
Someone is stormy and not wet if and only if he is not attractive and not tough.
If someone is stormy or he is tough, then he is not orange.
If there is someone who is both wet and attractive, then Bowen is beautiful.
If Culver is beautiful and Bowen is orange, then Culver is not stormy. | Bert is not tough. | contradiction |
Homer is beautiful.
Culver is not orange.
Culver is wet.
Homer is orange.
Bert is wet.
Hunter is orange.
Bert is not beautiful.
Curt is attractive.
Hunter is not tough.
Hunter is not attractive.
Culver is tough.
Curt is beautiful.Someone who is not attractive is always not wet.
If Bowen is tough or Hunter is beautiful, then Homer is not attractive.
Homer is not wet if and only if Hunter is beautiful and Culver is not orange.
If someone is orange, then he is not wet, and vice versa.
If Bert is wet or Curt is stormy, then Hunter is not orange.
Someone is tough and orange if and only if he is not beautiful.
Homer is stormy if and only if Curt is not wet.
Homer is not stormy if and only if Homer is not tough and Culver is not beautiful.
Someone is stormy and not wet if and only if he is not attractive and not tough.
If someone is stormy or he is tough, then he is not orange.
If there is someone who is both wet and attractive, then Bowen is beautiful.
If Culver is beautiful and Bowen is orange, then Culver is not stormy. | Bert is not beautiful. | entailment |
Homer is beautiful.
Culver is not orange.
Culver is wet.
Homer is orange.
Bert is wet.
Hunter is orange.
Bert is not beautiful.
Curt is attractive.
Hunter is not tough.
Hunter is not attractive.
Culver is tough.
Curt is beautiful.Someone who is not attractive is always not wet.
If Bowen is tough or Hunter is beautiful, then Homer is not attractive.
Homer is not wet if and only if Hunter is beautiful and Culver is not orange.
If someone is orange, then he is not wet, and vice versa.
If Bert is wet or Curt is stormy, then Hunter is not orange.
Someone is tough and orange if and only if he is not beautiful.
Homer is stormy if and only if Curt is not wet.
Homer is not stormy if and only if Homer is not tough and Culver is not beautiful.
Someone is stormy and not wet if and only if he is not attractive and not tough.
If someone is stormy or he is tough, then he is not orange.
If there is someone who is both wet and attractive, then Bowen is beautiful.
If Culver is beautiful and Bowen is orange, then Culver is not stormy. | Hunter is beautiful. | entailment |
Homer is beautiful.
Culver is not orange.
Culver is wet.
Homer is orange.
Bert is wet.
Hunter is orange.
Bert is not beautiful.
Curt is attractive.
Hunter is not tough.
Hunter is not attractive.
Culver is tough.
Curt is beautiful.Someone who is not attractive is always not wet.
If Bowen is tough or Hunter is beautiful, then Homer is not attractive.
Homer is not wet if and only if Hunter is beautiful and Culver is not orange.
If someone is orange, then he is not wet, and vice versa.
If Bert is wet or Curt is stormy, then Hunter is not orange.
Someone is tough and orange if and only if he is not beautiful.
Homer is stormy if and only if Curt is not wet.
Homer is not stormy if and only if Homer is not tough and Culver is not beautiful.
Someone is stormy and not wet if and only if he is not attractive and not tough.
If someone is stormy or he is tough, then he is not orange.
If there is someone who is both wet and attractive, then Bowen is beautiful.
If Culver is beautiful and Bowen is orange, then Culver is not stormy. | Bert is orange. | self_contradiction |
Homer is beautiful.
Culver is not orange.
Culver is wet.
Homer is orange.
Bert is wet.
Hunter is orange.
Bert is not beautiful.
Curt is attractive.
Hunter is not tough.
Hunter is not attractive.
Culver is tough.
Curt is beautiful.Someone who is not attractive is always not wet.
If Bowen is tough or Hunter is beautiful, then Homer is not attractive.
Homer is not wet if and only if Hunter is beautiful and Culver is not orange.
If someone is orange, then he is not wet, and vice versa.
If Bert is wet or Curt is stormy, then Hunter is not orange.
Someone is tough and orange if and only if he is not beautiful.
Homer is stormy if and only if Curt is not wet.
Homer is not stormy if and only if Homer is not tough and Culver is not beautiful.
Someone is stormy and not wet if and only if he is not attractive and not tough.
If someone is stormy or he is tough, then he is not orange.
If there is someone who is both wet and attractive, then Bowen is beautiful.
If Culver is beautiful and Bowen is orange, then Culver is not stormy. | Hunter is orange. | self_contradiction |
Braden is not automatic.
Alvin is not unable.
Claude is not friendly.
Quade is not friendly.
Carl is conscientious.
Carl is confident.
Arthur is confident.
Quade is conscientious.
Claude is not automatic.
Claude is confident.
Lionel is unable.
Claude is not conscientious.If there is someone who is confident, then Lionel is conscientious and Alvin is not automatic.
As long as someone is automatic, he is not confident and conscientious.
If there is someone who is either worried or automatic, then Arthur is conscientious.
It can be concluded that Claude is not confident once knowing that Lionel is friendly or Alvin is not conscientious.
Someone is not confident if and only if he is conscientious.
Quade being not confident is equivalent to Alvin being not friendly and Braden being not conscientious.
If there is at least one people who is not worried, then Arthur is not confident and Quade is not conscientious.
If someone who is not worried is also not friendly, then he is conscientious.
It can be concluded that Arthur is not confident and Alvin is not worried once knowing that Braden is not automatic and Quade is unable.
Someone who is eithor worried or confident is always unable.
If there is at least one people who is both not friendly and not conscientious, then Arthur is not automatic.
If someone is not friendly, then he is not confident. | Carl is not friendly. | neutral |
Braden is not automatic.
Alvin is not unable.
Claude is not friendly.
Quade is not friendly.
Carl is conscientious.
Carl is confident.
Arthur is confident.
Quade is conscientious.
Claude is not automatic.
Claude is confident.
Lionel is unable.
Claude is not conscientious.If there is someone who is confident, then Lionel is conscientious and Alvin is not automatic.
As long as someone is automatic, he is not confident and conscientious.
If there is someone who is either worried or automatic, then Arthur is conscientious.
It can be concluded that Claude is not confident once knowing that Lionel is friendly or Alvin is not conscientious.
Someone is not confident if and only if he is conscientious.
Quade being not confident is equivalent to Alvin being not friendly and Braden being not conscientious.
If there is at least one people who is not worried, then Arthur is not confident and Quade is not conscientious.
If someone who is not worried is also not friendly, then he is conscientious.
It can be concluded that Arthur is not confident and Alvin is not worried once knowing that Braden is not automatic and Quade is unable.
Someone who is eithor worried or confident is always unable.
If there is at least one people who is both not friendly and not conscientious, then Arthur is not automatic.
If someone is not friendly, then he is not confident. | Arthur is not conscientious. | neutral |
Braden is not automatic.
Alvin is not unable.
Claude is not friendly.
Quade is not friendly.
Carl is conscientious.
Carl is confident.
Arthur is confident.
Quade is conscientious.
Claude is not automatic.
Claude is confident.
Lionel is unable.
Claude is not conscientious.If there is someone who is confident, then Lionel is conscientious and Alvin is not automatic.
As long as someone is automatic, he is not confident and conscientious.
If there is someone who is either worried or automatic, then Arthur is conscientious.
It can be concluded that Claude is not confident once knowing that Lionel is friendly or Alvin is not conscientious.
Someone is not confident if and only if he is conscientious.
Quade being not confident is equivalent to Alvin being not friendly and Braden being not conscientious.
If there is at least one people who is not worried, then Arthur is not confident and Quade is not conscientious.
If someone who is not worried is also not friendly, then he is conscientious.
It can be concluded that Arthur is not confident and Alvin is not worried once knowing that Braden is not automatic and Quade is unable.
Someone who is eithor worried or confident is always unable.
If there is at least one people who is both not friendly and not conscientious, then Arthur is not automatic.
If someone is not friendly, then he is not confident. | Claude is automatic. | contradiction |
Braden is not automatic.
Alvin is not unable.
Claude is not friendly.
Quade is not friendly.
Carl is conscientious.
Carl is confident.
Arthur is confident.
Quade is conscientious.
Claude is not automatic.
Claude is confident.
Lionel is unable.
Claude is not conscientious.If there is someone who is confident, then Lionel is conscientious and Alvin is not automatic.
As long as someone is automatic, he is not confident and conscientious.
If there is someone who is either worried or automatic, then Arthur is conscientious.
It can be concluded that Claude is not confident once knowing that Lionel is friendly or Alvin is not conscientious.
Someone is not confident if and only if he is conscientious.
Quade being not confident is equivalent to Alvin being not friendly and Braden being not conscientious.
If there is at least one people who is not worried, then Arthur is not confident and Quade is not conscientious.
If someone who is not worried is also not friendly, then he is conscientious.
It can be concluded that Arthur is not confident and Alvin is not worried once knowing that Braden is not automatic and Quade is unable.
Someone who is eithor worried or confident is always unable.
If there is at least one people who is both not friendly and not conscientious, then Arthur is not automatic.
If someone is not friendly, then he is not confident. | Alvin is friendly. | contradiction |
Braden is not automatic.
Alvin is not unable.
Claude is not friendly.
Quade is not friendly.
Carl is conscientious.
Carl is confident.
Arthur is confident.
Quade is conscientious.
Claude is not automatic.
Claude is confident.
Lionel is unable.
Claude is not conscientious.If there is someone who is confident, then Lionel is conscientious and Alvin is not automatic.
As long as someone is automatic, he is not confident and conscientious.
If there is someone who is either worried or automatic, then Arthur is conscientious.
It can be concluded that Claude is not confident once knowing that Lionel is friendly or Alvin is not conscientious.
Someone is not confident if and only if he is conscientious.
Quade being not confident is equivalent to Alvin being not friendly and Braden being not conscientious.
If there is at least one people who is not worried, then Arthur is not confident and Quade is not conscientious.
If someone who is not worried is also not friendly, then he is conscientious.
It can be concluded that Arthur is not confident and Alvin is not worried once knowing that Braden is not automatic and Quade is unable.
Someone who is eithor worried or confident is always unable.
If there is at least one people who is both not friendly and not conscientious, then Arthur is not automatic.
If someone is not friendly, then he is not confident. | Carl is not confident. | self_contradiction |
Braden is not automatic.
Alvin is not unable.
Claude is not friendly.
Quade is not friendly.
Carl is conscientious.
Carl is confident.
Arthur is confident.
Quade is conscientious.
Claude is not automatic.
Claude is confident.
Lionel is unable.
Claude is not conscientious.If there is someone who is confident, then Lionel is conscientious and Alvin is not automatic.
As long as someone is automatic, he is not confident and conscientious.
If there is someone who is either worried or automatic, then Arthur is conscientious.
It can be concluded that Claude is not confident once knowing that Lionel is friendly or Alvin is not conscientious.
Someone is not confident if and only if he is conscientious.
Quade being not confident is equivalent to Alvin being not friendly and Braden being not conscientious.
If there is at least one people who is not worried, then Arthur is not confident and Quade is not conscientious.
If someone who is not worried is also not friendly, then he is conscientious.
It can be concluded that Arthur is not confident and Alvin is not worried once knowing that Braden is not automatic and Quade is unable.
Someone who is eithor worried or confident is always unable.
If there is at least one people who is both not friendly and not conscientious, then Arthur is not automatic.
If someone is not friendly, then he is not confident. | Quade is confident. | contradiction |
Braden is not automatic.
Alvin is not unable.
Claude is not friendly.
Quade is not friendly.
Carl is conscientious.
Carl is confident.
Arthur is confident.
Quade is conscientious.
Claude is not automatic.
Claude is confident.
Lionel is unable.
Claude is not conscientious.If there is someone who is confident, then Lionel is conscientious and Alvin is not automatic.
As long as someone is automatic, he is not confident and conscientious.
If there is someone who is either worried or automatic, then Arthur is conscientious.
It can be concluded that Claude is not confident once knowing that Lionel is friendly or Alvin is not conscientious.
Someone is not confident if and only if he is conscientious.
Quade being not confident is equivalent to Alvin being not friendly and Braden being not conscientious.
If there is at least one people who is not worried, then Arthur is not confident and Quade is not conscientious.
If someone who is not worried is also not friendly, then he is conscientious.
It can be concluded that Arthur is not confident and Alvin is not worried once knowing that Braden is not automatic and Quade is unable.
Someone who is eithor worried or confident is always unable.
If there is at least one people who is both not friendly and not conscientious, then Arthur is not automatic.
If someone is not friendly, then he is not confident. | Alvin is not friendly. | entailment |
Braden is not automatic.
Alvin is not unable.
Claude is not friendly.
Quade is not friendly.
Carl is conscientious.
Carl is confident.
Arthur is confident.
Quade is conscientious.
Claude is not automatic.
Claude is confident.
Lionel is unable.
Claude is not conscientious.If there is someone who is confident, then Lionel is conscientious and Alvin is not automatic.
As long as someone is automatic, he is not confident and conscientious.
If there is someone who is either worried or automatic, then Arthur is conscientious.
It can be concluded that Claude is not confident once knowing that Lionel is friendly or Alvin is not conscientious.
Someone is not confident if and only if he is conscientious.
Quade being not confident is equivalent to Alvin being not friendly and Braden being not conscientious.
If there is at least one people who is not worried, then Arthur is not confident and Quade is not conscientious.
If someone who is not worried is also not friendly, then he is conscientious.
It can be concluded that Arthur is not confident and Alvin is not worried once knowing that Braden is not automatic and Quade is unable.
Someone who is eithor worried or confident is always unable.
If there is at least one people who is both not friendly and not conscientious, then Arthur is not automatic.
If someone is not friendly, then he is not confident. | Carl is confident. | self_contradiction |
Braden is not automatic.
Alvin is not unable.
Claude is not friendly.
Quade is not friendly.
Carl is conscientious.
Carl is confident.
Arthur is confident.
Quade is conscientious.
Claude is not automatic.
Claude is confident.
Lionel is unable.
Claude is not conscientious.If there is someone who is confident, then Lionel is conscientious and Alvin is not automatic.
As long as someone is automatic, he is not confident and conscientious.
If there is someone who is either worried or automatic, then Arthur is conscientious.
It can be concluded that Claude is not confident once knowing that Lionel is friendly or Alvin is not conscientious.
Someone is not confident if and only if he is conscientious.
Quade being not confident is equivalent to Alvin being not friendly and Braden being not conscientious.
If there is at least one people who is not worried, then Arthur is not confident and Quade is not conscientious.
If someone who is not worried is also not friendly, then he is conscientious.
It can be concluded that Arthur is not confident and Alvin is not worried once knowing that Braden is not automatic and Quade is unable.
Someone who is eithor worried or confident is always unable.
If there is at least one people who is both not friendly and not conscientious, then Arthur is not automatic.
If someone is not friendly, then he is not confident. | Braden is friendly. | neutral |
Braden is not automatic.
Alvin is not unable.
Claude is not friendly.
Quade is not friendly.
Carl is conscientious.
Carl is confident.
Arthur is confident.
Quade is conscientious.
Claude is not automatic.
Claude is confident.
Lionel is unable.
Claude is not conscientious.If there is someone who is confident, then Lionel is conscientious and Alvin is not automatic.
As long as someone is automatic, he is not confident and conscientious.
If there is someone who is either worried or automatic, then Arthur is conscientious.
It can be concluded that Claude is not confident once knowing that Lionel is friendly or Alvin is not conscientious.
Someone is not confident if and only if he is conscientious.
Quade being not confident is equivalent to Alvin being not friendly and Braden being not conscientious.
If there is at least one people who is not worried, then Arthur is not confident and Quade is not conscientious.
If someone who is not worried is also not friendly, then he is conscientious.
It can be concluded that Arthur is not confident and Alvin is not worried once knowing that Braden is not automatic and Quade is unable.
Someone who is eithor worried or confident is always unable.
If there is at least one people who is both not friendly and not conscientious, then Arthur is not automatic.
If someone is not friendly, then he is not confident. | Claude is not confident. | self_contradiction |
Braden is not automatic.
Alvin is not unable.
Claude is not friendly.
Quade is not friendly.
Carl is conscientious.
Carl is confident.
Arthur is confident.
Quade is conscientious.
Claude is not automatic.
Claude is confident.
Lionel is unable.
Claude is not conscientious.If there is someone who is confident, then Lionel is conscientious and Alvin is not automatic.
As long as someone is automatic, he is not confident and conscientious.
If there is someone who is either worried or automatic, then Arthur is conscientious.
It can be concluded that Claude is not confident once knowing that Lionel is friendly or Alvin is not conscientious.
Someone is not confident if and only if he is conscientious.
Quade being not confident is equivalent to Alvin being not friendly and Braden being not conscientious.
If there is at least one people who is not worried, then Arthur is not confident and Quade is not conscientious.
If someone who is not worried is also not friendly, then he is conscientious.
It can be concluded that Arthur is not confident and Alvin is not worried once knowing that Braden is not automatic and Quade is unable.
Someone who is eithor worried or confident is always unable.
If there is at least one people who is both not friendly and not conscientious, then Arthur is not automatic.
If someone is not friendly, then he is not confident. | Quade is not unable. | neutral |
Braden is not automatic.
Alvin is not unable.
Claude is not friendly.
Quade is not friendly.
Carl is conscientious.
Carl is confident.
Arthur is confident.
Quade is conscientious.
Claude is not automatic.
Claude is confident.
Lionel is unable.
Claude is not conscientious.If there is someone who is confident, then Lionel is conscientious and Alvin is not automatic.
As long as someone is automatic, he is not confident and conscientious.
If there is someone who is either worried or automatic, then Arthur is conscientious.
It can be concluded that Claude is not confident once knowing that Lionel is friendly or Alvin is not conscientious.
Someone is not confident if and only if he is conscientious.
Quade being not confident is equivalent to Alvin being not friendly and Braden being not conscientious.
If there is at least one people who is not worried, then Arthur is not confident and Quade is not conscientious.
If someone who is not worried is also not friendly, then he is conscientious.
It can be concluded that Arthur is not confident and Alvin is not worried once knowing that Braden is not automatic and Quade is unable.
Someone who is eithor worried or confident is always unable.
If there is at least one people who is both not friendly and not conscientious, then Arthur is not automatic.
If someone is not friendly, then he is not confident. | Claude is confident. | self_contradiction |
Braden is not automatic.
Alvin is not unable.
Claude is not friendly.
Quade is not friendly.
Carl is conscientious.
Carl is confident.
Arthur is confident.
Quade is conscientious.
Claude is not automatic.
Claude is confident.
Lionel is unable.
Claude is not conscientious.If there is someone who is confident, then Lionel is conscientious and Alvin is not automatic.
As long as someone is automatic, he is not confident and conscientious.
If there is someone who is either worried or automatic, then Arthur is conscientious.
It can be concluded that Claude is not confident once knowing that Lionel is friendly or Alvin is not conscientious.
Someone is not confident if and only if he is conscientious.
Quade being not confident is equivalent to Alvin being not friendly and Braden being not conscientious.
If there is at least one people who is not worried, then Arthur is not confident and Quade is not conscientious.
If someone who is not worried is also not friendly, then he is conscientious.
It can be concluded that Arthur is not confident and Alvin is not worried once knowing that Braden is not automatic and Quade is unable.
Someone who is eithor worried or confident is always unable.
If there is at least one people who is both not friendly and not conscientious, then Arthur is not automatic.
If someone is not friendly, then he is not confident. | Lionel is not conscientious. | contradiction |
Braden is not automatic.
Alvin is not unable.
Claude is not friendly.
Quade is not friendly.
Carl is conscientious.
Carl is confident.
Arthur is confident.
Quade is conscientious.
Claude is not automatic.
Claude is confident.
Lionel is unable.
Claude is not conscientious.If there is someone who is confident, then Lionel is conscientious and Alvin is not automatic.
As long as someone is automatic, he is not confident and conscientious.
If there is someone who is either worried or automatic, then Arthur is conscientious.
It can be concluded that Claude is not confident once knowing that Lionel is friendly or Alvin is not conscientious.
Someone is not confident if and only if he is conscientious.
Quade being not confident is equivalent to Alvin being not friendly and Braden being not conscientious.
If there is at least one people who is not worried, then Arthur is not confident and Quade is not conscientious.
If someone who is not worried is also not friendly, then he is conscientious.
It can be concluded that Arthur is not confident and Alvin is not worried once knowing that Braden is not automatic and Quade is unable.
Someone who is eithor worried or confident is always unable.
If there is at least one people who is both not friendly and not conscientious, then Arthur is not automatic.
If someone is not friendly, then he is not confident. | Claude is friendly. | contradiction |
Braden is not automatic.
Alvin is not unable.
Claude is not friendly.
Quade is not friendly.
Carl is conscientious.
Carl is confident.
Arthur is confident.
Quade is conscientious.
Claude is not automatic.
Claude is confident.
Lionel is unable.
Claude is not conscientious.If there is someone who is confident, then Lionel is conscientious and Alvin is not automatic.
As long as someone is automatic, he is not confident and conscientious.
If there is someone who is either worried or automatic, then Arthur is conscientious.
It can be concluded that Claude is not confident once knowing that Lionel is friendly or Alvin is not conscientious.
Someone is not confident if and only if he is conscientious.
Quade being not confident is equivalent to Alvin being not friendly and Braden being not conscientious.
If there is at least one people who is not worried, then Arthur is not confident and Quade is not conscientious.
If someone who is not worried is also not friendly, then he is conscientious.
It can be concluded that Arthur is not confident and Alvin is not worried once knowing that Braden is not automatic and Quade is unable.
Someone who is eithor worried or confident is always unable.
If there is at least one people who is both not friendly and not conscientious, then Arthur is not automatic.
If someone is not friendly, then he is not confident. | Quade is not friendly. | entailment |
Braden is not automatic.
Alvin is not unable.
Claude is not friendly.
Quade is not friendly.
Carl is conscientious.
Carl is confident.
Arthur is confident.
Quade is conscientious.
Claude is not automatic.
Claude is confident.
Lionel is unable.
Claude is not conscientious.If there is someone who is confident, then Lionel is conscientious and Alvin is not automatic.
As long as someone is automatic, he is not confident and conscientious.
If there is someone who is either worried or automatic, then Arthur is conscientious.
It can be concluded that Claude is not confident once knowing that Lionel is friendly or Alvin is not conscientious.
Someone is not confident if and only if he is conscientious.
Quade being not confident is equivalent to Alvin being not friendly and Braden being not conscientious.
If there is at least one people who is not worried, then Arthur is not confident and Quade is not conscientious.
If someone who is not worried is also not friendly, then he is conscientious.
It can be concluded that Arthur is not confident and Alvin is not worried once knowing that Braden is not automatic and Quade is unable.
Someone who is eithor worried or confident is always unable.
If there is at least one people who is both not friendly and not conscientious, then Arthur is not automatic.
If someone is not friendly, then he is not confident. | Alvin is not unable. | entailment |
Braden is not automatic.
Alvin is not unable.
Claude is not friendly.
Quade is not friendly.
Carl is conscientious.
Carl is confident.
Arthur is confident.
Quade is conscientious.
Claude is not automatic.
Claude is confident.
Lionel is unable.
Claude is not conscientious.If there is someone who is confident, then Lionel is conscientious and Alvin is not automatic.
As long as someone is automatic, he is not confident and conscientious.
If there is someone who is either worried or automatic, then Arthur is conscientious.
It can be concluded that Claude is not confident once knowing that Lionel is friendly or Alvin is not conscientious.
Someone is not confident if and only if he is conscientious.
Quade being not confident is equivalent to Alvin being not friendly and Braden being not conscientious.
If there is at least one people who is not worried, then Arthur is not confident and Quade is not conscientious.
If someone who is not worried is also not friendly, then he is conscientious.
It can be concluded that Arthur is not confident and Alvin is not worried once knowing that Braden is not automatic and Quade is unable.
Someone who is eithor worried or confident is always unable.
If there is at least one people who is both not friendly and not conscientious, then Arthur is not automatic.
If someone is not friendly, then he is not confident. | Claude is conscientious. | self_contradiction |
Braden is not automatic.
Alvin is not unable.
Claude is not friendly.
Quade is not friendly.
Carl is conscientious.
Carl is confident.
Arthur is confident.
Quade is conscientious.
Claude is not automatic.
Claude is confident.
Lionel is unable.
Claude is not conscientious.If there is someone who is confident, then Lionel is conscientious and Alvin is not automatic.
As long as someone is automatic, he is not confident and conscientious.
If there is someone who is either worried or automatic, then Arthur is conscientious.
It can be concluded that Claude is not confident once knowing that Lionel is friendly or Alvin is not conscientious.
Someone is not confident if and only if he is conscientious.
Quade being not confident is equivalent to Alvin being not friendly and Braden being not conscientious.
If there is at least one people who is not worried, then Arthur is not confident and Quade is not conscientious.
If someone who is not worried is also not friendly, then he is conscientious.
It can be concluded that Arthur is not confident and Alvin is not worried once knowing that Braden is not automatic and Quade is unable.
Someone who is eithor worried or confident is always unable.
If there is at least one people who is both not friendly and not conscientious, then Arthur is not automatic.
If someone is not friendly, then he is not confident. | Claude is not friendly. | entailment |
Braden is not automatic.
Alvin is not unable.
Claude is not friendly.
Quade is not friendly.
Carl is conscientious.
Carl is confident.
Arthur is confident.
Quade is conscientious.
Claude is not automatic.
Claude is confident.
Lionel is unable.
Claude is not conscientious.If there is someone who is confident, then Lionel is conscientious and Alvin is not automatic.
As long as someone is automatic, he is not confident and conscientious.
If there is someone who is either worried or automatic, then Arthur is conscientious.
It can be concluded that Claude is not confident once knowing that Lionel is friendly or Alvin is not conscientious.
Someone is not confident if and only if he is conscientious.
Quade being not confident is equivalent to Alvin being not friendly and Braden being not conscientious.
If there is at least one people who is not worried, then Arthur is not confident and Quade is not conscientious.
If someone who is not worried is also not friendly, then he is conscientious.
It can be concluded that Arthur is not confident and Alvin is not worried once knowing that Braden is not automatic and Quade is unable.
Someone who is eithor worried or confident is always unable.
If there is at least one people who is both not friendly and not conscientious, then Arthur is not automatic.
If someone is not friendly, then he is not confident. | Claude is worried. | neutral |
Braden is not automatic.
Alvin is not unable.
Claude is not friendly.
Quade is not friendly.
Carl is conscientious.
Carl is confident.
Arthur is confident.
Quade is conscientious.
Claude is not automatic.
Claude is confident.
Lionel is unable.
Claude is not conscientious.If there is someone who is confident, then Lionel is conscientious and Alvin is not automatic.
As long as someone is automatic, he is not confident and conscientious.
If there is someone who is either worried or automatic, then Arthur is conscientious.
It can be concluded that Claude is not confident once knowing that Lionel is friendly or Alvin is not conscientious.
Someone is not confident if and only if he is conscientious.
Quade being not confident is equivalent to Alvin being not friendly and Braden being not conscientious.
If there is at least one people who is not worried, then Arthur is not confident and Quade is not conscientious.
If someone who is not worried is also not friendly, then he is conscientious.
It can be concluded that Arthur is not confident and Alvin is not worried once knowing that Braden is not automatic and Quade is unable.
Someone who is eithor worried or confident is always unable.
If there is at least one people who is both not friendly and not conscientious, then Arthur is not automatic.
If someone is not friendly, then he is not confident. | Lionel is unable. | entailment |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.