premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Caldwell is not unusual.
Graham is not curious.
Kimberly is not massive.
Aubrey is not curious.
Tracey is massive.
Tracey is not unusual.
Ethan is famous.
Kimberly is not unusual.
Kimberly is bloody.
Caldwell is not massive.
Caldwell is not curious.
Aubrey is bloody.If someone is not famous and unusual, then he is not massive, and vice versa.
If someone is both not curious and not bloody, then he is yellow.
If Tracey is bloody or Ethan is massive, then Sophia is not famous.
Someone is not unusual and not massive if and only if he is yellow.
If there is someone who is either not curious or not bloody, then Graham is not unusual.
If someone is curious, then he is unusual.
If Aubrey is bloody, then Kimberly is not famous and Kimberly is yellow.
If someone who is bloody is also not curious, then he is yellow.
If Sophia is not unusual, then Kimberly is massive, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Aubrey is famous once knowing that Kimberly is not yellow.
If there is at least one people who is curious, then Caldwell is not unusual and Kimberly is yellow.
If there is at least one people who is not curious or yellow, then Graham is famous. | Sophia is bloody. | neutral |
Caldwell is not unusual.
Graham is not curious.
Kimberly is not massive.
Aubrey is not curious.
Tracey is massive.
Tracey is not unusual.
Ethan is famous.
Kimberly is not unusual.
Kimberly is bloody.
Caldwell is not massive.
Caldwell is not curious.
Aubrey is bloody.If someone is not famous and unusual, then he is not massive, and vice versa.
If someone is both not curious and not bloody, then he is yellow.
If Tracey is bloody or Ethan is massive, then Sophia is not famous.
Someone is not unusual and not massive if and only if he is yellow.
If there is someone who is either not curious or not bloody, then Graham is not unusual.
If someone is curious, then he is unusual.
If Aubrey is bloody, then Kimberly is not famous and Kimberly is yellow.
If someone who is bloody is also not curious, then he is yellow.
If Sophia is not unusual, then Kimberly is massive, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Aubrey is famous once knowing that Kimberly is not yellow.
If there is at least one people who is curious, then Caldwell is not unusual and Kimberly is yellow.
If there is at least one people who is not curious or yellow, then Graham is famous. | Tracey is unusual. | contradiction |
Caldwell is not unusual.
Graham is not curious.
Kimberly is not massive.
Aubrey is not curious.
Tracey is massive.
Tracey is not unusual.
Ethan is famous.
Kimberly is not unusual.
Kimberly is bloody.
Caldwell is not massive.
Caldwell is not curious.
Aubrey is bloody.If someone is not famous and unusual, then he is not massive, and vice versa.
If someone is both not curious and not bloody, then he is yellow.
If Tracey is bloody or Ethan is massive, then Sophia is not famous.
Someone is not unusual and not massive if and only if he is yellow.
If there is someone who is either not curious or not bloody, then Graham is not unusual.
If someone is curious, then he is unusual.
If Aubrey is bloody, then Kimberly is not famous and Kimberly is yellow.
If someone who is bloody is also not curious, then he is yellow.
If Sophia is not unusual, then Kimberly is massive, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Aubrey is famous once knowing that Kimberly is not yellow.
If there is at least one people who is curious, then Caldwell is not unusual and Kimberly is yellow.
If there is at least one people who is not curious or yellow, then Graham is famous. | Tracey is massive. | entailment |
Caldwell is not unusual.
Graham is not curious.
Kimberly is not massive.
Aubrey is not curious.
Tracey is massive.
Tracey is not unusual.
Ethan is famous.
Kimberly is not unusual.
Kimberly is bloody.
Caldwell is not massive.
Caldwell is not curious.
Aubrey is bloody.If someone is not famous and unusual, then he is not massive, and vice versa.
If someone is both not curious and not bloody, then he is yellow.
If Tracey is bloody or Ethan is massive, then Sophia is not famous.
Someone is not unusual and not massive if and only if he is yellow.
If there is someone who is either not curious or not bloody, then Graham is not unusual.
If someone is curious, then he is unusual.
If Aubrey is bloody, then Kimberly is not famous and Kimberly is yellow.
If someone who is bloody is also not curious, then he is yellow.
If Sophia is not unusual, then Kimberly is massive, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Aubrey is famous once knowing that Kimberly is not yellow.
If there is at least one people who is curious, then Caldwell is not unusual and Kimberly is yellow.
If there is at least one people who is not curious or yellow, then Graham is famous. | Aubrey is not famous. | entailment |
Caldwell is not unusual.
Graham is not curious.
Kimberly is not massive.
Aubrey is not curious.
Tracey is massive.
Tracey is not unusual.
Ethan is famous.
Kimberly is not unusual.
Kimberly is bloody.
Caldwell is not massive.
Caldwell is not curious.
Aubrey is bloody.If someone is not famous and unusual, then he is not massive, and vice versa.
If someone is both not curious and not bloody, then he is yellow.
If Tracey is bloody or Ethan is massive, then Sophia is not famous.
Someone is not unusual and not massive if and only if he is yellow.
If there is someone who is either not curious or not bloody, then Graham is not unusual.
If someone is curious, then he is unusual.
If Aubrey is bloody, then Kimberly is not famous and Kimberly is yellow.
If someone who is bloody is also not curious, then he is yellow.
If Sophia is not unusual, then Kimberly is massive, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Aubrey is famous once knowing that Kimberly is not yellow.
If there is at least one people who is curious, then Caldwell is not unusual and Kimberly is yellow.
If there is at least one people who is not curious or yellow, then Graham is famous. | Tracey is famous. | neutral |
Caldwell is not unusual.
Graham is not curious.
Kimberly is not massive.
Aubrey is not curious.
Tracey is massive.
Tracey is not unusual.
Ethan is famous.
Kimberly is not unusual.
Kimberly is bloody.
Caldwell is not massive.
Caldwell is not curious.
Aubrey is bloody.If someone is not famous and unusual, then he is not massive, and vice versa.
If someone is both not curious and not bloody, then he is yellow.
If Tracey is bloody or Ethan is massive, then Sophia is not famous.
Someone is not unusual and not massive if and only if he is yellow.
If there is someone who is either not curious or not bloody, then Graham is not unusual.
If someone is curious, then he is unusual.
If Aubrey is bloody, then Kimberly is not famous and Kimberly is yellow.
If someone who is bloody is also not curious, then he is yellow.
If Sophia is not unusual, then Kimberly is massive, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Aubrey is famous once knowing that Kimberly is not yellow.
If there is at least one people who is curious, then Caldwell is not unusual and Kimberly is yellow.
If there is at least one people who is not curious or yellow, then Graham is famous. | Caldwell is curious. | contradiction |
Caldwell is not unusual.
Graham is not curious.
Kimberly is not massive.
Aubrey is not curious.
Tracey is massive.
Tracey is not unusual.
Ethan is famous.
Kimberly is not unusual.
Kimberly is bloody.
Caldwell is not massive.
Caldwell is not curious.
Aubrey is bloody.If someone is not famous and unusual, then he is not massive, and vice versa.
If someone is both not curious and not bloody, then he is yellow.
If Tracey is bloody or Ethan is massive, then Sophia is not famous.
Someone is not unusual and not massive if and only if he is yellow.
If there is someone who is either not curious or not bloody, then Graham is not unusual.
If someone is curious, then he is unusual.
If Aubrey is bloody, then Kimberly is not famous and Kimberly is yellow.
If someone who is bloody is also not curious, then he is yellow.
If Sophia is not unusual, then Kimberly is massive, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Aubrey is famous once knowing that Kimberly is not yellow.
If there is at least one people who is curious, then Caldwell is not unusual and Kimberly is yellow.
If there is at least one people who is not curious or yellow, then Graham is famous. | Caldwell is massive. | contradiction |
Caldwell is not unusual.
Graham is not curious.
Kimberly is not massive.
Aubrey is not curious.
Tracey is massive.
Tracey is not unusual.
Ethan is famous.
Kimberly is not unusual.
Kimberly is bloody.
Caldwell is not massive.
Caldwell is not curious.
Aubrey is bloody.If someone is not famous and unusual, then he is not massive, and vice versa.
If someone is both not curious and not bloody, then he is yellow.
If Tracey is bloody or Ethan is massive, then Sophia is not famous.
Someone is not unusual and not massive if and only if he is yellow.
If there is someone who is either not curious or not bloody, then Graham is not unusual.
If someone is curious, then he is unusual.
If Aubrey is bloody, then Kimberly is not famous and Kimberly is yellow.
If someone who is bloody is also not curious, then he is yellow.
If Sophia is not unusual, then Kimberly is massive, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Aubrey is famous once knowing that Kimberly is not yellow.
If there is at least one people who is curious, then Caldwell is not unusual and Kimberly is yellow.
If there is at least one people who is not curious or yellow, then Graham is famous. | Ethan is massive. | neutral |
Caldwell is not unusual.
Graham is not curious.
Kimberly is not massive.
Aubrey is not curious.
Tracey is massive.
Tracey is not unusual.
Ethan is famous.
Kimberly is not unusual.
Kimberly is bloody.
Caldwell is not massive.
Caldwell is not curious.
Aubrey is bloody.If someone is not famous and unusual, then he is not massive, and vice versa.
If someone is both not curious and not bloody, then he is yellow.
If Tracey is bloody or Ethan is massive, then Sophia is not famous.
Someone is not unusual and not massive if and only if he is yellow.
If there is someone who is either not curious or not bloody, then Graham is not unusual.
If someone is curious, then he is unusual.
If Aubrey is bloody, then Kimberly is not famous and Kimberly is yellow.
If someone who is bloody is also not curious, then he is yellow.
If Sophia is not unusual, then Kimberly is massive, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Aubrey is famous once knowing that Kimberly is not yellow.
If there is at least one people who is curious, then Caldwell is not unusual and Kimberly is yellow.
If there is at least one people who is not curious or yellow, then Graham is famous. | Sophia is not unusual. | neutral |
Caldwell is not unusual.
Graham is not curious.
Kimberly is not massive.
Aubrey is not curious.
Tracey is massive.
Tracey is not unusual.
Ethan is famous.
Kimberly is not unusual.
Kimberly is bloody.
Caldwell is not massive.
Caldwell is not curious.
Aubrey is bloody.If someone is not famous and unusual, then he is not massive, and vice versa.
If someone is both not curious and not bloody, then he is yellow.
If Tracey is bloody or Ethan is massive, then Sophia is not famous.
Someone is not unusual and not massive if and only if he is yellow.
If there is someone who is either not curious or not bloody, then Graham is not unusual.
If someone is curious, then he is unusual.
If Aubrey is bloody, then Kimberly is not famous and Kimberly is yellow.
If someone who is bloody is also not curious, then he is yellow.
If Sophia is not unusual, then Kimberly is massive, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Aubrey is famous once knowing that Kimberly is not yellow.
If there is at least one people who is curious, then Caldwell is not unusual and Kimberly is yellow.
If there is at least one people who is not curious or yellow, then Graham is famous. | Kimberly is famous. | contradiction |
Caldwell is not unusual.
Graham is not curious.
Kimberly is not massive.
Aubrey is not curious.
Tracey is massive.
Tracey is not unusual.
Ethan is famous.
Kimberly is not unusual.
Kimberly is bloody.
Caldwell is not massive.
Caldwell is not curious.
Aubrey is bloody.If someone is not famous and unusual, then he is not massive, and vice versa.
If someone is both not curious and not bloody, then he is yellow.
If Tracey is bloody or Ethan is massive, then Sophia is not famous.
Someone is not unusual and not massive if and only if he is yellow.
If there is someone who is either not curious or not bloody, then Graham is not unusual.
If someone is curious, then he is unusual.
If Aubrey is bloody, then Kimberly is not famous and Kimberly is yellow.
If someone who is bloody is also not curious, then he is yellow.
If Sophia is not unusual, then Kimberly is massive, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Aubrey is famous once knowing that Kimberly is not yellow.
If there is at least one people who is curious, then Caldwell is not unusual and Kimberly is yellow.
If there is at least one people who is not curious or yellow, then Graham is famous. | Caldwell is not unusual. | self_contradiction |
Caldwell is not unusual.
Graham is not curious.
Kimberly is not massive.
Aubrey is not curious.
Tracey is massive.
Tracey is not unusual.
Ethan is famous.
Kimberly is not unusual.
Kimberly is bloody.
Caldwell is not massive.
Caldwell is not curious.
Aubrey is bloody.If someone is not famous and unusual, then he is not massive, and vice versa.
If someone is both not curious and not bloody, then he is yellow.
If Tracey is bloody or Ethan is massive, then Sophia is not famous.
Someone is not unusual and not massive if and only if he is yellow.
If there is someone who is either not curious or not bloody, then Graham is not unusual.
If someone is curious, then he is unusual.
If Aubrey is bloody, then Kimberly is not famous and Kimberly is yellow.
If someone who is bloody is also not curious, then he is yellow.
If Sophia is not unusual, then Kimberly is massive, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Aubrey is famous once knowing that Kimberly is not yellow.
If there is at least one people who is curious, then Caldwell is not unusual and Kimberly is yellow.
If there is at least one people who is not curious or yellow, then Graham is famous. | Graham is famous. | entailment |
Caldwell is not unusual.
Graham is not curious.
Kimberly is not massive.
Aubrey is not curious.
Tracey is massive.
Tracey is not unusual.
Ethan is famous.
Kimberly is not unusual.
Kimberly is bloody.
Caldwell is not massive.
Caldwell is not curious.
Aubrey is bloody.If someone is not famous and unusual, then he is not massive, and vice versa.
If someone is both not curious and not bloody, then he is yellow.
If Tracey is bloody or Ethan is massive, then Sophia is not famous.
Someone is not unusual and not massive if and only if he is yellow.
If there is someone who is either not curious or not bloody, then Graham is not unusual.
If someone is curious, then he is unusual.
If Aubrey is bloody, then Kimberly is not famous and Kimberly is yellow.
If someone who is bloody is also not curious, then he is yellow.
If Sophia is not unusual, then Kimberly is massive, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Aubrey is famous once knowing that Kimberly is not yellow.
If there is at least one people who is curious, then Caldwell is not unusual and Kimberly is yellow.
If there is at least one people who is not curious or yellow, then Graham is famous. | Aubrey is curious. | contradiction |
Caldwell is not unusual.
Graham is not curious.
Kimberly is not massive.
Aubrey is not curious.
Tracey is massive.
Tracey is not unusual.
Ethan is famous.
Kimberly is not unusual.
Kimberly is bloody.
Caldwell is not massive.
Caldwell is not curious.
Aubrey is bloody.If someone is not famous and unusual, then he is not massive, and vice versa.
If someone is both not curious and not bloody, then he is yellow.
If Tracey is bloody or Ethan is massive, then Sophia is not famous.
Someone is not unusual and not massive if and only if he is yellow.
If there is someone who is either not curious or not bloody, then Graham is not unusual.
If someone is curious, then he is unusual.
If Aubrey is bloody, then Kimberly is not famous and Kimberly is yellow.
If someone who is bloody is also not curious, then he is yellow.
If Sophia is not unusual, then Kimberly is massive, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Aubrey is famous once knowing that Kimberly is not yellow.
If there is at least one people who is curious, then Caldwell is not unusual and Kimberly is yellow.
If there is at least one people who is not curious or yellow, then Graham is famous. | Ethan is yellow. | neutral |
Caldwell is not unusual.
Graham is not curious.
Kimberly is not massive.
Aubrey is not curious.
Tracey is massive.
Tracey is not unusual.
Ethan is famous.
Kimberly is not unusual.
Kimberly is bloody.
Caldwell is not massive.
Caldwell is not curious.
Aubrey is bloody.If someone is not famous and unusual, then he is not massive, and vice versa.
If someone is both not curious and not bloody, then he is yellow.
If Tracey is bloody or Ethan is massive, then Sophia is not famous.
Someone is not unusual and not massive if and only if he is yellow.
If there is someone who is either not curious or not bloody, then Graham is not unusual.
If someone is curious, then he is unusual.
If Aubrey is bloody, then Kimberly is not famous and Kimberly is yellow.
If someone who is bloody is also not curious, then he is yellow.
If Sophia is not unusual, then Kimberly is massive, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Aubrey is famous once knowing that Kimberly is not yellow.
If there is at least one people who is curious, then Caldwell is not unusual and Kimberly is yellow.
If there is at least one people who is not curious or yellow, then Graham is famous. | Kimberly is not unusual. | self_contradiction |
Caldwell is not unusual.
Graham is not curious.
Kimberly is not massive.
Aubrey is not curious.
Tracey is massive.
Tracey is not unusual.
Ethan is famous.
Kimberly is not unusual.
Kimberly is bloody.
Caldwell is not massive.
Caldwell is not curious.
Aubrey is bloody.If someone is not famous and unusual, then he is not massive, and vice versa.
If someone is both not curious and not bloody, then he is yellow.
If Tracey is bloody or Ethan is massive, then Sophia is not famous.
Someone is not unusual and not massive if and only if he is yellow.
If there is someone who is either not curious or not bloody, then Graham is not unusual.
If someone is curious, then he is unusual.
If Aubrey is bloody, then Kimberly is not famous and Kimberly is yellow.
If someone who is bloody is also not curious, then he is yellow.
If Sophia is not unusual, then Kimberly is massive, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Aubrey is famous once knowing that Kimberly is not yellow.
If there is at least one people who is curious, then Caldwell is not unusual and Kimberly is yellow.
If there is at least one people who is not curious or yellow, then Graham is famous. | Ethan is famous. | entailment |
Caldwell is not unusual.
Graham is not curious.
Kimberly is not massive.
Aubrey is not curious.
Tracey is massive.
Tracey is not unusual.
Ethan is famous.
Kimberly is not unusual.
Kimberly is bloody.
Caldwell is not massive.
Caldwell is not curious.
Aubrey is bloody.If someone is not famous and unusual, then he is not massive, and vice versa.
If someone is both not curious and not bloody, then he is yellow.
If Tracey is bloody or Ethan is massive, then Sophia is not famous.
Someone is not unusual and not massive if and only if he is yellow.
If there is someone who is either not curious or not bloody, then Graham is not unusual.
If someone is curious, then he is unusual.
If Aubrey is bloody, then Kimberly is not famous and Kimberly is yellow.
If someone who is bloody is also not curious, then he is yellow.
If Sophia is not unusual, then Kimberly is massive, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Aubrey is famous once knowing that Kimberly is not yellow.
If there is at least one people who is curious, then Caldwell is not unusual and Kimberly is yellow.
If there is at least one people who is not curious or yellow, then Graham is famous. | Aubrey is unusual. | self_contradiction |
Caldwell is not unusual.
Graham is not curious.
Kimberly is not massive.
Aubrey is not curious.
Tracey is massive.
Tracey is not unusual.
Ethan is famous.
Kimberly is not unusual.
Kimberly is bloody.
Caldwell is not massive.
Caldwell is not curious.
Aubrey is bloody.If someone is not famous and unusual, then he is not massive, and vice versa.
If someone is both not curious and not bloody, then he is yellow.
If Tracey is bloody or Ethan is massive, then Sophia is not famous.
Someone is not unusual and not massive if and only if he is yellow.
If there is someone who is either not curious or not bloody, then Graham is not unusual.
If someone is curious, then he is unusual.
If Aubrey is bloody, then Kimberly is not famous and Kimberly is yellow.
If someone who is bloody is also not curious, then he is yellow.
If Sophia is not unusual, then Kimberly is massive, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Aubrey is famous once knowing that Kimberly is not yellow.
If there is at least one people who is curious, then Caldwell is not unusual and Kimberly is yellow.
If there is at least one people who is not curious or yellow, then Graham is famous. | Kimberly is unusual. | self_contradiction |
Caldwell is not unusual.
Graham is not curious.
Kimberly is not massive.
Aubrey is not curious.
Tracey is massive.
Tracey is not unusual.
Ethan is famous.
Kimberly is not unusual.
Kimberly is bloody.
Caldwell is not massive.
Caldwell is not curious.
Aubrey is bloody.If someone is not famous and unusual, then he is not massive, and vice versa.
If someone is both not curious and not bloody, then he is yellow.
If Tracey is bloody or Ethan is massive, then Sophia is not famous.
Someone is not unusual and not massive if and only if he is yellow.
If there is someone who is either not curious or not bloody, then Graham is not unusual.
If someone is curious, then he is unusual.
If Aubrey is bloody, then Kimberly is not famous and Kimberly is yellow.
If someone who is bloody is also not curious, then he is yellow.
If Sophia is not unusual, then Kimberly is massive, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Aubrey is famous once knowing that Kimberly is not yellow.
If there is at least one people who is curious, then Caldwell is not unusual and Kimberly is yellow.
If there is at least one people who is not curious or yellow, then Graham is famous. | Aubrey is not unusual. | self_contradiction |
Caldwell is not unusual.
Graham is not curious.
Kimberly is not massive.
Aubrey is not curious.
Tracey is massive.
Tracey is not unusual.
Ethan is famous.
Kimberly is not unusual.
Kimberly is bloody.
Caldwell is not massive.
Caldwell is not curious.
Aubrey is bloody.If someone is not famous and unusual, then he is not massive, and vice versa.
If someone is both not curious and not bloody, then he is yellow.
If Tracey is bloody or Ethan is massive, then Sophia is not famous.
Someone is not unusual and not massive if and only if he is yellow.
If there is someone who is either not curious or not bloody, then Graham is not unusual.
If someone is curious, then he is unusual.
If Aubrey is bloody, then Kimberly is not famous and Kimberly is yellow.
If someone who is bloody is also not curious, then he is yellow.
If Sophia is not unusual, then Kimberly is massive, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Aubrey is famous once knowing that Kimberly is not yellow.
If there is at least one people who is curious, then Caldwell is not unusual and Kimberly is yellow.
If there is at least one people who is not curious or yellow, then Graham is famous. | Tracey is not unusual. | entailment |
Kendall is not distracted.
Spencer is not guilty.
Garth is courageous.
Garth is not distracted.
Kim is not courageous.
Spencer is friendly.
Clark is not guilty.
Clark is not worried.
Spencer is not worried.
Kim is friendly.
Traci is not guilty.
Clark is not friendly.If all people are distracted, then Traci is guilty and Garth is courageous.
If someone is both blushing and not friendly, then he is courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both courageous and not distracted, then Garth is friendly.
If someone is not guilty or friendly, then he is blushing.
Traci being friendly or Clark being not distracted implies that Spencer is guilty.
Someone who is eithor not friendly or not blushing is always not guilty.
Traci being not friendly implies that Kendall is guilty.
If there is at least one people who is both blushing and not courageous, then Clark is not distracted.
If there is at least one people who is courageous, then Spencer is not friendly and Kim is not guilty.
Vera being blushing or Clark being not friendly implies that Garth is not guilty.
If someone is not friendly and guilty, then he is not worried, and vice versa.
Spencer being not distracted is equivalent to Garth being guilty. | Spencer is not guilty. | self_contradiction |
Kendall is not distracted.
Spencer is not guilty.
Garth is courageous.
Garth is not distracted.
Kim is not courageous.
Spencer is friendly.
Clark is not guilty.
Clark is not worried.
Spencer is not worried.
Kim is friendly.
Traci is not guilty.
Clark is not friendly.If all people are distracted, then Traci is guilty and Garth is courageous.
If someone is both blushing and not friendly, then he is courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both courageous and not distracted, then Garth is friendly.
If someone is not guilty or friendly, then he is blushing.
Traci being friendly or Clark being not distracted implies that Spencer is guilty.
Someone who is eithor not friendly or not blushing is always not guilty.
Traci being not friendly implies that Kendall is guilty.
If there is at least one people who is both blushing and not courageous, then Clark is not distracted.
If there is at least one people who is courageous, then Spencer is not friendly and Kim is not guilty.
Vera being blushing or Clark being not friendly implies that Garth is not guilty.
If someone is not friendly and guilty, then he is not worried, and vice versa.
Spencer being not distracted is equivalent to Garth being guilty. | Clark is not guilty. | self_contradiction |
Kendall is not distracted.
Spencer is not guilty.
Garth is courageous.
Garth is not distracted.
Kim is not courageous.
Spencer is friendly.
Clark is not guilty.
Clark is not worried.
Spencer is not worried.
Kim is friendly.
Traci is not guilty.
Clark is not friendly.If all people are distracted, then Traci is guilty and Garth is courageous.
If someone is both blushing and not friendly, then he is courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both courageous and not distracted, then Garth is friendly.
If someone is not guilty or friendly, then he is blushing.
Traci being friendly or Clark being not distracted implies that Spencer is guilty.
Someone who is eithor not friendly or not blushing is always not guilty.
Traci being not friendly implies that Kendall is guilty.
If there is at least one people who is both blushing and not courageous, then Clark is not distracted.
If there is at least one people who is courageous, then Spencer is not friendly and Kim is not guilty.
Vera being blushing or Clark being not friendly implies that Garth is not guilty.
If someone is not friendly and guilty, then he is not worried, and vice versa.
Spencer being not distracted is equivalent to Garth being guilty. | Spencer is not blushing. | contradiction |
Kendall is not distracted.
Spencer is not guilty.
Garth is courageous.
Garth is not distracted.
Kim is not courageous.
Spencer is friendly.
Clark is not guilty.
Clark is not worried.
Spencer is not worried.
Kim is friendly.
Traci is not guilty.
Clark is not friendly.If all people are distracted, then Traci is guilty and Garth is courageous.
If someone is both blushing and not friendly, then he is courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both courageous and not distracted, then Garth is friendly.
If someone is not guilty or friendly, then he is blushing.
Traci being friendly or Clark being not distracted implies that Spencer is guilty.
Someone who is eithor not friendly or not blushing is always not guilty.
Traci being not friendly implies that Kendall is guilty.
If there is at least one people who is both blushing and not courageous, then Clark is not distracted.
If there is at least one people who is courageous, then Spencer is not friendly and Kim is not guilty.
Vera being blushing or Clark being not friendly implies that Garth is not guilty.
If someone is not friendly and guilty, then he is not worried, and vice versa.
Spencer being not distracted is equivalent to Garth being guilty. | Kim is not courageous. | entailment |
Kendall is not distracted.
Spencer is not guilty.
Garth is courageous.
Garth is not distracted.
Kim is not courageous.
Spencer is friendly.
Clark is not guilty.
Clark is not worried.
Spencer is not worried.
Kim is friendly.
Traci is not guilty.
Clark is not friendly.If all people are distracted, then Traci is guilty and Garth is courageous.
If someone is both blushing and not friendly, then he is courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both courageous and not distracted, then Garth is friendly.
If someone is not guilty or friendly, then he is blushing.
Traci being friendly or Clark being not distracted implies that Spencer is guilty.
Someone who is eithor not friendly or not blushing is always not guilty.
Traci being not friendly implies that Kendall is guilty.
If there is at least one people who is both blushing and not courageous, then Clark is not distracted.
If there is at least one people who is courageous, then Spencer is not friendly and Kim is not guilty.
Vera being blushing or Clark being not friendly implies that Garth is not guilty.
If someone is not friendly and guilty, then he is not worried, and vice versa.
Spencer being not distracted is equivalent to Garth being guilty. | Kendall is not distracted. | entailment |
Kendall is not distracted.
Spencer is not guilty.
Garth is courageous.
Garth is not distracted.
Kim is not courageous.
Spencer is friendly.
Clark is not guilty.
Clark is not worried.
Spencer is not worried.
Kim is friendly.
Traci is not guilty.
Clark is not friendly.If all people are distracted, then Traci is guilty and Garth is courageous.
If someone is both blushing and not friendly, then he is courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both courageous and not distracted, then Garth is friendly.
If someone is not guilty or friendly, then he is blushing.
Traci being friendly or Clark being not distracted implies that Spencer is guilty.
Someone who is eithor not friendly or not blushing is always not guilty.
Traci being not friendly implies that Kendall is guilty.
If there is at least one people who is both blushing and not courageous, then Clark is not distracted.
If there is at least one people who is courageous, then Spencer is not friendly and Kim is not guilty.
Vera being blushing or Clark being not friendly implies that Garth is not guilty.
If someone is not friendly and guilty, then he is not worried, and vice versa.
Spencer being not distracted is equivalent to Garth being guilty. | Vera is blushing. | neutral |
Kendall is not distracted.
Spencer is not guilty.
Garth is courageous.
Garth is not distracted.
Kim is not courageous.
Spencer is friendly.
Clark is not guilty.
Clark is not worried.
Spencer is not worried.
Kim is friendly.
Traci is not guilty.
Clark is not friendly.If all people are distracted, then Traci is guilty and Garth is courageous.
If someone is both blushing and not friendly, then he is courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both courageous and not distracted, then Garth is friendly.
If someone is not guilty or friendly, then he is blushing.
Traci being friendly or Clark being not distracted implies that Spencer is guilty.
Someone who is eithor not friendly or not blushing is always not guilty.
Traci being not friendly implies that Kendall is guilty.
If there is at least one people who is both blushing and not courageous, then Clark is not distracted.
If there is at least one people who is courageous, then Spencer is not friendly and Kim is not guilty.
Vera being blushing or Clark being not friendly implies that Garth is not guilty.
If someone is not friendly and guilty, then he is not worried, and vice versa.
Spencer being not distracted is equivalent to Garth being guilty. | Kim is not blushing. | contradiction |
Kendall is not distracted.
Spencer is not guilty.
Garth is courageous.
Garth is not distracted.
Kim is not courageous.
Spencer is friendly.
Clark is not guilty.
Clark is not worried.
Spencer is not worried.
Kim is friendly.
Traci is not guilty.
Clark is not friendly.If all people are distracted, then Traci is guilty and Garth is courageous.
If someone is both blushing and not friendly, then he is courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both courageous and not distracted, then Garth is friendly.
If someone is not guilty or friendly, then he is blushing.
Traci being friendly or Clark being not distracted implies that Spencer is guilty.
Someone who is eithor not friendly or not blushing is always not guilty.
Traci being not friendly implies that Kendall is guilty.
If there is at least one people who is both blushing and not courageous, then Clark is not distracted.
If there is at least one people who is courageous, then Spencer is not friendly and Kim is not guilty.
Vera being blushing or Clark being not friendly implies that Garth is not guilty.
If someone is not friendly and guilty, then he is not worried, and vice versa.
Spencer being not distracted is equivalent to Garth being guilty. | Traci is not courageous. | neutral |
Kendall is not distracted.
Spencer is not guilty.
Garth is courageous.
Garth is not distracted.
Kim is not courageous.
Spencer is friendly.
Clark is not guilty.
Clark is not worried.
Spencer is not worried.
Kim is friendly.
Traci is not guilty.
Clark is not friendly.If all people are distracted, then Traci is guilty and Garth is courageous.
If someone is both blushing and not friendly, then he is courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both courageous and not distracted, then Garth is friendly.
If someone is not guilty or friendly, then he is blushing.
Traci being friendly or Clark being not distracted implies that Spencer is guilty.
Someone who is eithor not friendly or not blushing is always not guilty.
Traci being not friendly implies that Kendall is guilty.
If there is at least one people who is both blushing and not courageous, then Clark is not distracted.
If there is at least one people who is courageous, then Spencer is not friendly and Kim is not guilty.
Vera being blushing or Clark being not friendly implies that Garth is not guilty.
If someone is not friendly and guilty, then he is not worried, and vice versa.
Spencer being not distracted is equivalent to Garth being guilty. | Spencer is not friendly. | self_contradiction |
Kendall is not distracted.
Spencer is not guilty.
Garth is courageous.
Garth is not distracted.
Kim is not courageous.
Spencer is friendly.
Clark is not guilty.
Clark is not worried.
Spencer is not worried.
Kim is friendly.
Traci is not guilty.
Clark is not friendly.If all people are distracted, then Traci is guilty and Garth is courageous.
If someone is both blushing and not friendly, then he is courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both courageous and not distracted, then Garth is friendly.
If someone is not guilty or friendly, then he is blushing.
Traci being friendly or Clark being not distracted implies that Spencer is guilty.
Someone who is eithor not friendly or not blushing is always not guilty.
Traci being not friendly implies that Kendall is guilty.
If there is at least one people who is both blushing and not courageous, then Clark is not distracted.
If there is at least one people who is courageous, then Spencer is not friendly and Kim is not guilty.
Vera being blushing or Clark being not friendly implies that Garth is not guilty.
If someone is not friendly and guilty, then he is not worried, and vice versa.
Spencer being not distracted is equivalent to Garth being guilty. | Kim is not guilty. | entailment |
Kendall is not distracted.
Spencer is not guilty.
Garth is courageous.
Garth is not distracted.
Kim is not courageous.
Spencer is friendly.
Clark is not guilty.
Clark is not worried.
Spencer is not worried.
Kim is friendly.
Traci is not guilty.
Clark is not friendly.If all people are distracted, then Traci is guilty and Garth is courageous.
If someone is both blushing and not friendly, then he is courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both courageous and not distracted, then Garth is friendly.
If someone is not guilty or friendly, then he is blushing.
Traci being friendly or Clark being not distracted implies that Spencer is guilty.
Someone who is eithor not friendly or not blushing is always not guilty.
Traci being not friendly implies that Kendall is guilty.
If there is at least one people who is both blushing and not courageous, then Clark is not distracted.
If there is at least one people who is courageous, then Spencer is not friendly and Kim is not guilty.
Vera being blushing or Clark being not friendly implies that Garth is not guilty.
If someone is not friendly and guilty, then he is not worried, and vice versa.
Spencer being not distracted is equivalent to Garth being guilty. | Spencer is friendly. | self_contradiction |
Kendall is not distracted.
Spencer is not guilty.
Garth is courageous.
Garth is not distracted.
Kim is not courageous.
Spencer is friendly.
Clark is not guilty.
Clark is not worried.
Spencer is not worried.
Kim is friendly.
Traci is not guilty.
Clark is not friendly.If all people are distracted, then Traci is guilty and Garth is courageous.
If someone is both blushing and not friendly, then he is courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both courageous and not distracted, then Garth is friendly.
If someone is not guilty or friendly, then he is blushing.
Traci being friendly or Clark being not distracted implies that Spencer is guilty.
Someone who is eithor not friendly or not blushing is always not guilty.
Traci being not friendly implies that Kendall is guilty.
If there is at least one people who is both blushing and not courageous, then Clark is not distracted.
If there is at least one people who is courageous, then Spencer is not friendly and Kim is not guilty.
Vera being blushing or Clark being not friendly implies that Garth is not guilty.
If someone is not friendly and guilty, then he is not worried, and vice versa.
Spencer being not distracted is equivalent to Garth being guilty. | Vera is not friendly. | neutral |
Kendall is not distracted.
Spencer is not guilty.
Garth is courageous.
Garth is not distracted.
Kim is not courageous.
Spencer is friendly.
Clark is not guilty.
Clark is not worried.
Spencer is not worried.
Kim is friendly.
Traci is not guilty.
Clark is not friendly.If all people are distracted, then Traci is guilty and Garth is courageous.
If someone is both blushing and not friendly, then he is courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both courageous and not distracted, then Garth is friendly.
If someone is not guilty or friendly, then he is blushing.
Traci being friendly or Clark being not distracted implies that Spencer is guilty.
Someone who is eithor not friendly or not blushing is always not guilty.
Traci being not friendly implies that Kendall is guilty.
If there is at least one people who is both blushing and not courageous, then Clark is not distracted.
If there is at least one people who is courageous, then Spencer is not friendly and Kim is not guilty.
Vera being blushing or Clark being not friendly implies that Garth is not guilty.
If someone is not friendly and guilty, then he is not worried, and vice versa.
Spencer being not distracted is equivalent to Garth being guilty. | Kendall is not worried. | neutral |
Kendall is not distracted.
Spencer is not guilty.
Garth is courageous.
Garth is not distracted.
Kim is not courageous.
Spencer is friendly.
Clark is not guilty.
Clark is not worried.
Spencer is not worried.
Kim is friendly.
Traci is not guilty.
Clark is not friendly.If all people are distracted, then Traci is guilty and Garth is courageous.
If someone is both blushing and not friendly, then he is courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both courageous and not distracted, then Garth is friendly.
If someone is not guilty or friendly, then he is blushing.
Traci being friendly or Clark being not distracted implies that Spencer is guilty.
Someone who is eithor not friendly or not blushing is always not guilty.
Traci being not friendly implies that Kendall is guilty.
If there is at least one people who is both blushing and not courageous, then Clark is not distracted.
If there is at least one people who is courageous, then Spencer is not friendly and Kim is not guilty.
Vera being blushing or Clark being not friendly implies that Garth is not guilty.
If someone is not friendly and guilty, then he is not worried, and vice versa.
Spencer being not distracted is equivalent to Garth being guilty. | Garth is guilty. | contradiction |
Kendall is not distracted.
Spencer is not guilty.
Garth is courageous.
Garth is not distracted.
Kim is not courageous.
Spencer is friendly.
Clark is not guilty.
Clark is not worried.
Spencer is not worried.
Kim is friendly.
Traci is not guilty.
Clark is not friendly.If all people are distracted, then Traci is guilty and Garth is courageous.
If someone is both blushing and not friendly, then he is courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both courageous and not distracted, then Garth is friendly.
If someone is not guilty or friendly, then he is blushing.
Traci being friendly or Clark being not distracted implies that Spencer is guilty.
Someone who is eithor not friendly or not blushing is always not guilty.
Traci being not friendly implies that Kendall is guilty.
If there is at least one people who is both blushing and not courageous, then Clark is not distracted.
If there is at least one people who is courageous, then Spencer is not friendly and Kim is not guilty.
Vera being blushing or Clark being not friendly implies that Garth is not guilty.
If someone is not friendly and guilty, then he is not worried, and vice versa.
Spencer being not distracted is equivalent to Garth being guilty. | Kim is not friendly. | contradiction |
Kendall is not distracted.
Spencer is not guilty.
Garth is courageous.
Garth is not distracted.
Kim is not courageous.
Spencer is friendly.
Clark is not guilty.
Clark is not worried.
Spencer is not worried.
Kim is friendly.
Traci is not guilty.
Clark is not friendly.If all people are distracted, then Traci is guilty and Garth is courageous.
If someone is both blushing and not friendly, then he is courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both courageous and not distracted, then Garth is friendly.
If someone is not guilty or friendly, then he is blushing.
Traci being friendly or Clark being not distracted implies that Spencer is guilty.
Someone who is eithor not friendly or not blushing is always not guilty.
Traci being not friendly implies that Kendall is guilty.
If there is at least one people who is both blushing and not courageous, then Clark is not distracted.
If there is at least one people who is courageous, then Spencer is not friendly and Kim is not guilty.
Vera being blushing or Clark being not friendly implies that Garth is not guilty.
If someone is not friendly and guilty, then he is not worried, and vice versa.
Spencer being not distracted is equivalent to Garth being guilty. | Clark is guilty. | self_contradiction |
Kendall is not distracted.
Spencer is not guilty.
Garth is courageous.
Garth is not distracted.
Kim is not courageous.
Spencer is friendly.
Clark is not guilty.
Clark is not worried.
Spencer is not worried.
Kim is friendly.
Traci is not guilty.
Clark is not friendly.If all people are distracted, then Traci is guilty and Garth is courageous.
If someone is both blushing and not friendly, then he is courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both courageous and not distracted, then Garth is friendly.
If someone is not guilty or friendly, then he is blushing.
Traci being friendly or Clark being not distracted implies that Spencer is guilty.
Someone who is eithor not friendly or not blushing is always not guilty.
Traci being not friendly implies that Kendall is guilty.
If there is at least one people who is both blushing and not courageous, then Clark is not distracted.
If there is at least one people who is courageous, then Spencer is not friendly and Kim is not guilty.
Vera being blushing or Clark being not friendly implies that Garth is not guilty.
If someone is not friendly and guilty, then he is not worried, and vice versa.
Spencer being not distracted is equivalent to Garth being guilty. | Traci is not blushing. | contradiction |
Kendall is not distracted.
Spencer is not guilty.
Garth is courageous.
Garth is not distracted.
Kim is not courageous.
Spencer is friendly.
Clark is not guilty.
Clark is not worried.
Spencer is not worried.
Kim is friendly.
Traci is not guilty.
Clark is not friendly.If all people are distracted, then Traci is guilty and Garth is courageous.
If someone is both blushing and not friendly, then he is courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both courageous and not distracted, then Garth is friendly.
If someone is not guilty or friendly, then he is blushing.
Traci being friendly or Clark being not distracted implies that Spencer is guilty.
Someone who is eithor not friendly or not blushing is always not guilty.
Traci being not friendly implies that Kendall is guilty.
If there is at least one people who is both blushing and not courageous, then Clark is not distracted.
If there is at least one people who is courageous, then Spencer is not friendly and Kim is not guilty.
Vera being blushing or Clark being not friendly implies that Garth is not guilty.
If someone is not friendly and guilty, then he is not worried, and vice versa.
Spencer being not distracted is equivalent to Garth being guilty. | Kendall is guilty. | neutral |
Kendall is not distracted.
Spencer is not guilty.
Garth is courageous.
Garth is not distracted.
Kim is not courageous.
Spencer is friendly.
Clark is not guilty.
Clark is not worried.
Spencer is not worried.
Kim is friendly.
Traci is not guilty.
Clark is not friendly.If all people are distracted, then Traci is guilty and Garth is courageous.
If someone is both blushing and not friendly, then he is courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both courageous and not distracted, then Garth is friendly.
If someone is not guilty or friendly, then he is blushing.
Traci being friendly or Clark being not distracted implies that Spencer is guilty.
Someone who is eithor not friendly or not blushing is always not guilty.
Traci being not friendly implies that Kendall is guilty.
If there is at least one people who is both blushing and not courageous, then Clark is not distracted.
If there is at least one people who is courageous, then Spencer is not friendly and Kim is not guilty.
Vera being blushing or Clark being not friendly implies that Garth is not guilty.
If someone is not friendly and guilty, then he is not worried, and vice versa.
Spencer being not distracted is equivalent to Garth being guilty. | Clark is not friendly. | entailment |
Kendall is not distracted.
Spencer is not guilty.
Garth is courageous.
Garth is not distracted.
Kim is not courageous.
Spencer is friendly.
Clark is not guilty.
Clark is not worried.
Spencer is not worried.
Kim is friendly.
Traci is not guilty.
Clark is not friendly.If all people are distracted, then Traci is guilty and Garth is courageous.
If someone is both blushing and not friendly, then he is courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both courageous and not distracted, then Garth is friendly.
If someone is not guilty or friendly, then he is blushing.
Traci being friendly or Clark being not distracted implies that Spencer is guilty.
Someone who is eithor not friendly or not blushing is always not guilty.
Traci being not friendly implies that Kendall is guilty.
If there is at least one people who is both blushing and not courageous, then Clark is not distracted.
If there is at least one people who is courageous, then Spencer is not friendly and Kim is not guilty.
Vera being blushing or Clark being not friendly implies that Garth is not guilty.
If someone is not friendly and guilty, then he is not worried, and vice versa.
Spencer being not distracted is equivalent to Garth being guilty. | Clark is courageous. | entailment |
Percival is not global.
Jonathan is not hungry.
Cadman is glorious.
Percival is not hungry.
Ambrose is global.
Ambrose is confident.
Nicholas is angry.
Jonathan is angry.
Nicholas is confident.
Percival is confident.
Cadman is not elegant.
Jonathan is not glorious.All not elegant people are not glorious.
Someone is elegant and not angry if and only if he is not glorious.
If someone is global, then he is not elegant, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jonathan is global once knowing that Hardy is hungry and Percival is not angry.
If there is someone who is either elegant or glorious, then Percival is angry.
If there is at least one people who is both not glorious and not angry, then Jonathan is elegant.
Percival being not angry and Percival being not confident imply that Jonathan is not elegant and Nicholas is glorious.
If there is at least one people who is not angry, then Jimmy is glorious.
Someone being both hungry and confident is equivalent to being global and glorious.
If there is at least one people who is elegant or not angry, then Hardy is glorious.
If someone who is not elegant is also not angry, then he is global.
Someone who is eithor not global or not hungry is always not confident. | Cadman is elegant. | self_contradiction |
Percival is not global.
Jonathan is not hungry.
Cadman is glorious.
Percival is not hungry.
Ambrose is global.
Ambrose is confident.
Nicholas is angry.
Jonathan is angry.
Nicholas is confident.
Percival is confident.
Cadman is not elegant.
Jonathan is not glorious.All not elegant people are not glorious.
Someone is elegant and not angry if and only if he is not glorious.
If someone is global, then he is not elegant, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jonathan is global once knowing that Hardy is hungry and Percival is not angry.
If there is someone who is either elegant or glorious, then Percival is angry.
If there is at least one people who is both not glorious and not angry, then Jonathan is elegant.
Percival being not angry and Percival being not confident imply that Jonathan is not elegant and Nicholas is glorious.
If there is at least one people who is not angry, then Jimmy is glorious.
Someone being both hungry and confident is equivalent to being global and glorious.
If there is at least one people who is elegant or not angry, then Hardy is glorious.
If someone who is not elegant is also not angry, then he is global.
Someone who is eithor not global or not hungry is always not confident. | Cadman is not confident. | contradiction |
Percival is not global.
Jonathan is not hungry.
Cadman is glorious.
Percival is not hungry.
Ambrose is global.
Ambrose is confident.
Nicholas is angry.
Jonathan is angry.
Nicholas is confident.
Percival is confident.
Cadman is not elegant.
Jonathan is not glorious.All not elegant people are not glorious.
Someone is elegant and not angry if and only if he is not glorious.
If someone is global, then he is not elegant, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jonathan is global once knowing that Hardy is hungry and Percival is not angry.
If there is someone who is either elegant or glorious, then Percival is angry.
If there is at least one people who is both not glorious and not angry, then Jonathan is elegant.
Percival being not angry and Percival being not confident imply that Jonathan is not elegant and Nicholas is glorious.
If there is at least one people who is not angry, then Jimmy is glorious.
Someone being both hungry and confident is equivalent to being global and glorious.
If there is at least one people who is elegant or not angry, then Hardy is glorious.
If someone who is not elegant is also not angry, then he is global.
Someone who is eithor not global or not hungry is always not confident. | Hardy is not elegant. | neutral |
Percival is not global.
Jonathan is not hungry.
Cadman is glorious.
Percival is not hungry.
Ambrose is global.
Ambrose is confident.
Nicholas is angry.
Jonathan is angry.
Nicholas is confident.
Percival is confident.
Cadman is not elegant.
Jonathan is not glorious.All not elegant people are not glorious.
Someone is elegant and not angry if and only if he is not glorious.
If someone is global, then he is not elegant, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jonathan is global once knowing that Hardy is hungry and Percival is not angry.
If there is someone who is either elegant or glorious, then Percival is angry.
If there is at least one people who is both not glorious and not angry, then Jonathan is elegant.
Percival being not angry and Percival being not confident imply that Jonathan is not elegant and Nicholas is glorious.
If there is at least one people who is not angry, then Jimmy is glorious.
Someone being both hungry and confident is equivalent to being global and glorious.
If there is at least one people who is elegant or not angry, then Hardy is glorious.
If someone who is not elegant is also not angry, then he is global.
Someone who is eithor not global or not hungry is always not confident. | Ambrose is not angry. | entailment |
Percival is not global.
Jonathan is not hungry.
Cadman is glorious.
Percival is not hungry.
Ambrose is global.
Ambrose is confident.
Nicholas is angry.
Jonathan is angry.
Nicholas is confident.
Percival is confident.
Cadman is not elegant.
Jonathan is not glorious.All not elegant people are not glorious.
Someone is elegant and not angry if and only if he is not glorious.
If someone is global, then he is not elegant, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jonathan is global once knowing that Hardy is hungry and Percival is not angry.
If there is someone who is either elegant or glorious, then Percival is angry.
If there is at least one people who is both not glorious and not angry, then Jonathan is elegant.
Percival being not angry and Percival being not confident imply that Jonathan is not elegant and Nicholas is glorious.
If there is at least one people who is not angry, then Jimmy is glorious.
Someone being both hungry and confident is equivalent to being global and glorious.
If there is at least one people who is elegant or not angry, then Hardy is glorious.
If someone who is not elegant is also not angry, then he is global.
Someone who is eithor not global or not hungry is always not confident. | Percival is not global. | entailment |
Percival is not global.
Jonathan is not hungry.
Cadman is glorious.
Percival is not hungry.
Ambrose is global.
Ambrose is confident.
Nicholas is angry.
Jonathan is angry.
Nicholas is confident.
Percival is confident.
Cadman is not elegant.
Jonathan is not glorious.All not elegant people are not glorious.
Someone is elegant and not angry if and only if he is not glorious.
If someone is global, then he is not elegant, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jonathan is global once knowing that Hardy is hungry and Percival is not angry.
If there is someone who is either elegant or glorious, then Percival is angry.
If there is at least one people who is both not glorious and not angry, then Jonathan is elegant.
Percival being not angry and Percival being not confident imply that Jonathan is not elegant and Nicholas is glorious.
If there is at least one people who is not angry, then Jimmy is glorious.
Someone being both hungry and confident is equivalent to being global and glorious.
If there is at least one people who is elegant or not angry, then Hardy is glorious.
If someone who is not elegant is also not angry, then he is global.
Someone who is eithor not global or not hungry is always not confident. | Percival is not confident. | self_contradiction |
Percival is not global.
Jonathan is not hungry.
Cadman is glorious.
Percival is not hungry.
Ambrose is global.
Ambrose is confident.
Nicholas is angry.
Jonathan is angry.
Nicholas is confident.
Percival is confident.
Cadman is not elegant.
Jonathan is not glorious.All not elegant people are not glorious.
Someone is elegant and not angry if and only if he is not glorious.
If someone is global, then he is not elegant, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jonathan is global once knowing that Hardy is hungry and Percival is not angry.
If there is someone who is either elegant or glorious, then Percival is angry.
If there is at least one people who is both not glorious and not angry, then Jonathan is elegant.
Percival being not angry and Percival being not confident imply that Jonathan is not elegant and Nicholas is glorious.
If there is at least one people who is not angry, then Jimmy is glorious.
Someone being both hungry and confident is equivalent to being global and glorious.
If there is at least one people who is elegant or not angry, then Hardy is glorious.
If someone who is not elegant is also not angry, then he is global.
Someone who is eithor not global or not hungry is always not confident. | Ambrose is elegant. | self_contradiction |
Percival is not global.
Jonathan is not hungry.
Cadman is glorious.
Percival is not hungry.
Ambrose is global.
Ambrose is confident.
Nicholas is angry.
Jonathan is angry.
Nicholas is confident.
Percival is confident.
Cadman is not elegant.
Jonathan is not glorious.All not elegant people are not glorious.
Someone is elegant and not angry if and only if he is not glorious.
If someone is global, then he is not elegant, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jonathan is global once knowing that Hardy is hungry and Percival is not angry.
If there is someone who is either elegant or glorious, then Percival is angry.
If there is at least one people who is both not glorious and not angry, then Jonathan is elegant.
Percival being not angry and Percival being not confident imply that Jonathan is not elegant and Nicholas is glorious.
If there is at least one people who is not angry, then Jimmy is glorious.
Someone being both hungry and confident is equivalent to being global and glorious.
If there is at least one people who is elegant or not angry, then Hardy is glorious.
If someone who is not elegant is also not angry, then he is global.
Someone who is eithor not global or not hungry is always not confident. | Jonathan is not hungry. | entailment |
Percival is not global.
Jonathan is not hungry.
Cadman is glorious.
Percival is not hungry.
Ambrose is global.
Ambrose is confident.
Nicholas is angry.
Jonathan is angry.
Nicholas is confident.
Percival is confident.
Cadman is not elegant.
Jonathan is not glorious.All not elegant people are not glorious.
Someone is elegant and not angry if and only if he is not glorious.
If someone is global, then he is not elegant, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jonathan is global once knowing that Hardy is hungry and Percival is not angry.
If there is someone who is either elegant or glorious, then Percival is angry.
If there is at least one people who is both not glorious and not angry, then Jonathan is elegant.
Percival being not angry and Percival being not confident imply that Jonathan is not elegant and Nicholas is glorious.
If there is at least one people who is not angry, then Jimmy is glorious.
Someone being both hungry and confident is equivalent to being global and glorious.
If there is at least one people who is elegant or not angry, then Hardy is glorious.
If someone who is not elegant is also not angry, then he is global.
Someone who is eithor not global or not hungry is always not confident. | Jimmy is not glorious. | contradiction |
Percival is not global.
Jonathan is not hungry.
Cadman is glorious.
Percival is not hungry.
Ambrose is global.
Ambrose is confident.
Nicholas is angry.
Jonathan is angry.
Nicholas is confident.
Percival is confident.
Cadman is not elegant.
Jonathan is not glorious.All not elegant people are not glorious.
Someone is elegant and not angry if and only if he is not glorious.
If someone is global, then he is not elegant, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jonathan is global once knowing that Hardy is hungry and Percival is not angry.
If there is someone who is either elegant or glorious, then Percival is angry.
If there is at least one people who is both not glorious and not angry, then Jonathan is elegant.
Percival being not angry and Percival being not confident imply that Jonathan is not elegant and Nicholas is glorious.
If there is at least one people who is not angry, then Jimmy is glorious.
Someone being both hungry and confident is equivalent to being global and glorious.
If there is at least one people who is elegant or not angry, then Hardy is glorious.
If someone who is not elegant is also not angry, then he is global.
Someone who is eithor not global or not hungry is always not confident. | Percival is not hungry. | entailment |
Percival is not global.
Jonathan is not hungry.
Cadman is glorious.
Percival is not hungry.
Ambrose is global.
Ambrose is confident.
Nicholas is angry.
Jonathan is angry.
Nicholas is confident.
Percival is confident.
Cadman is not elegant.
Jonathan is not glorious.All not elegant people are not glorious.
Someone is elegant and not angry if and only if he is not glorious.
If someone is global, then he is not elegant, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jonathan is global once knowing that Hardy is hungry and Percival is not angry.
If there is someone who is either elegant or glorious, then Percival is angry.
If there is at least one people who is both not glorious and not angry, then Jonathan is elegant.
Percival being not angry and Percival being not confident imply that Jonathan is not elegant and Nicholas is glorious.
If there is at least one people who is not angry, then Jimmy is glorious.
Someone being both hungry and confident is equivalent to being global and glorious.
If there is at least one people who is elegant or not angry, then Hardy is glorious.
If someone who is not elegant is also not angry, then he is global.
Someone who is eithor not global or not hungry is always not confident. | Percival is hungry. | contradiction |
Percival is not global.
Jonathan is not hungry.
Cadman is glorious.
Percival is not hungry.
Ambrose is global.
Ambrose is confident.
Nicholas is angry.
Jonathan is angry.
Nicholas is confident.
Percival is confident.
Cadman is not elegant.
Jonathan is not glorious.All not elegant people are not glorious.
Someone is elegant and not angry if and only if he is not glorious.
If someone is global, then he is not elegant, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jonathan is global once knowing that Hardy is hungry and Percival is not angry.
If there is someone who is either elegant or glorious, then Percival is angry.
If there is at least one people who is both not glorious and not angry, then Jonathan is elegant.
Percival being not angry and Percival being not confident imply that Jonathan is not elegant and Nicholas is glorious.
If there is at least one people who is not angry, then Jimmy is glorious.
Someone being both hungry and confident is equivalent to being global and glorious.
If there is at least one people who is elegant or not angry, then Hardy is glorious.
If someone who is not elegant is also not angry, then he is global.
Someone who is eithor not global or not hungry is always not confident. | Jonathan is confident. | contradiction |
Percival is not global.
Jonathan is not hungry.
Cadman is glorious.
Percival is not hungry.
Ambrose is global.
Ambrose is confident.
Nicholas is angry.
Jonathan is angry.
Nicholas is confident.
Percival is confident.
Cadman is not elegant.
Jonathan is not glorious.All not elegant people are not glorious.
Someone is elegant and not angry if and only if he is not glorious.
If someone is global, then he is not elegant, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jonathan is global once knowing that Hardy is hungry and Percival is not angry.
If there is someone who is either elegant or glorious, then Percival is angry.
If there is at least one people who is both not glorious and not angry, then Jonathan is elegant.
Percival being not angry and Percival being not confident imply that Jonathan is not elegant and Nicholas is glorious.
If there is at least one people who is not angry, then Jimmy is glorious.
Someone being both hungry and confident is equivalent to being global and glorious.
If there is at least one people who is elegant or not angry, then Hardy is glorious.
If someone who is not elegant is also not angry, then he is global.
Someone who is eithor not global or not hungry is always not confident. | Ambrose is global. | entailment |
Percival is not global.
Jonathan is not hungry.
Cadman is glorious.
Percival is not hungry.
Ambrose is global.
Ambrose is confident.
Nicholas is angry.
Jonathan is angry.
Nicholas is confident.
Percival is confident.
Cadman is not elegant.
Jonathan is not glorious.All not elegant people are not glorious.
Someone is elegant and not angry if and only if he is not glorious.
If someone is global, then he is not elegant, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jonathan is global once knowing that Hardy is hungry and Percival is not angry.
If there is someone who is either elegant or glorious, then Percival is angry.
If there is at least one people who is both not glorious and not angry, then Jonathan is elegant.
Percival being not angry and Percival being not confident imply that Jonathan is not elegant and Nicholas is glorious.
If there is at least one people who is not angry, then Jimmy is glorious.
Someone being both hungry and confident is equivalent to being global and glorious.
If there is at least one people who is elegant or not angry, then Hardy is glorious.
If someone who is not elegant is also not angry, then he is global.
Someone who is eithor not global or not hungry is always not confident. | Nicholas is not hungry. | neutral |
Percival is not global.
Jonathan is not hungry.
Cadman is glorious.
Percival is not hungry.
Ambrose is global.
Ambrose is confident.
Nicholas is angry.
Jonathan is angry.
Nicholas is confident.
Percival is confident.
Cadman is not elegant.
Jonathan is not glorious.All not elegant people are not glorious.
Someone is elegant and not angry if and only if he is not glorious.
If someone is global, then he is not elegant, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jonathan is global once knowing that Hardy is hungry and Percival is not angry.
If there is someone who is either elegant or glorious, then Percival is angry.
If there is at least one people who is both not glorious and not angry, then Jonathan is elegant.
Percival being not angry and Percival being not confident imply that Jonathan is not elegant and Nicholas is glorious.
If there is at least one people who is not angry, then Jimmy is glorious.
Someone being both hungry and confident is equivalent to being global and glorious.
If there is at least one people who is elegant or not angry, then Hardy is glorious.
If someone who is not elegant is also not angry, then he is global.
Someone who is eithor not global or not hungry is always not confident. | Ambrose is not hungry. | neutral |
Percival is not global.
Jonathan is not hungry.
Cadman is glorious.
Percival is not hungry.
Ambrose is global.
Ambrose is confident.
Nicholas is angry.
Jonathan is angry.
Nicholas is confident.
Percival is confident.
Cadman is not elegant.
Jonathan is not glorious.All not elegant people are not glorious.
Someone is elegant and not angry if and only if he is not glorious.
If someone is global, then he is not elegant, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jonathan is global once knowing that Hardy is hungry and Percival is not angry.
If there is someone who is either elegant or glorious, then Percival is angry.
If there is at least one people who is both not glorious and not angry, then Jonathan is elegant.
Percival being not angry and Percival being not confident imply that Jonathan is not elegant and Nicholas is glorious.
If there is at least one people who is not angry, then Jimmy is glorious.
Someone being both hungry and confident is equivalent to being global and glorious.
If there is at least one people who is elegant or not angry, then Hardy is glorious.
If someone who is not elegant is also not angry, then he is global.
Someone who is eithor not global or not hungry is always not confident. | Hardy is not glorious. | contradiction |
Percival is not global.
Jonathan is not hungry.
Cadman is glorious.
Percival is not hungry.
Ambrose is global.
Ambrose is confident.
Nicholas is angry.
Jonathan is angry.
Nicholas is confident.
Percival is confident.
Cadman is not elegant.
Jonathan is not glorious.All not elegant people are not glorious.
Someone is elegant and not angry if and only if he is not glorious.
If someone is global, then he is not elegant, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jonathan is global once knowing that Hardy is hungry and Percival is not angry.
If there is someone who is either elegant or glorious, then Percival is angry.
If there is at least one people who is both not glorious and not angry, then Jonathan is elegant.
Percival being not angry and Percival being not confident imply that Jonathan is not elegant and Nicholas is glorious.
If there is at least one people who is not angry, then Jimmy is glorious.
Someone being both hungry and confident is equivalent to being global and glorious.
If there is at least one people who is elegant or not angry, then Hardy is glorious.
If someone who is not elegant is also not angry, then he is global.
Someone who is eithor not global or not hungry is always not confident. | Cadman is not glorious. | self_contradiction |
Percival is not global.
Jonathan is not hungry.
Cadman is glorious.
Percival is not hungry.
Ambrose is global.
Ambrose is confident.
Nicholas is angry.
Jonathan is angry.
Nicholas is confident.
Percival is confident.
Cadman is not elegant.
Jonathan is not glorious.All not elegant people are not glorious.
Someone is elegant and not angry if and only if he is not glorious.
If someone is global, then he is not elegant, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jonathan is global once knowing that Hardy is hungry and Percival is not angry.
If there is someone who is either elegant or glorious, then Percival is angry.
If there is at least one people who is both not glorious and not angry, then Jonathan is elegant.
Percival being not angry and Percival being not confident imply that Jonathan is not elegant and Nicholas is glorious.
If there is at least one people who is not angry, then Jimmy is glorious.
Someone being both hungry and confident is equivalent to being global and glorious.
If there is at least one people who is elegant or not angry, then Hardy is glorious.
If someone who is not elegant is also not angry, then he is global.
Someone who is eithor not global or not hungry is always not confident. | Cadman is glorious. | self_contradiction |
Percival is not global.
Jonathan is not hungry.
Cadman is glorious.
Percival is not hungry.
Ambrose is global.
Ambrose is confident.
Nicholas is angry.
Jonathan is angry.
Nicholas is confident.
Percival is confident.
Cadman is not elegant.
Jonathan is not glorious.All not elegant people are not glorious.
Someone is elegant and not angry if and only if he is not glorious.
If someone is global, then he is not elegant, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jonathan is global once knowing that Hardy is hungry and Percival is not angry.
If there is someone who is either elegant or glorious, then Percival is angry.
If there is at least one people who is both not glorious and not angry, then Jonathan is elegant.
Percival being not angry and Percival being not confident imply that Jonathan is not elegant and Nicholas is glorious.
If there is at least one people who is not angry, then Jimmy is glorious.
Someone being both hungry and confident is equivalent to being global and glorious.
If there is at least one people who is elegant or not angry, then Hardy is glorious.
If someone who is not elegant is also not angry, then he is global.
Someone who is eithor not global or not hungry is always not confident. | Hardy is not angry. | neutral |
Percival is not global.
Jonathan is not hungry.
Cadman is glorious.
Percival is not hungry.
Ambrose is global.
Ambrose is confident.
Nicholas is angry.
Jonathan is angry.
Nicholas is confident.
Percival is confident.
Cadman is not elegant.
Jonathan is not glorious.All not elegant people are not glorious.
Someone is elegant and not angry if and only if he is not glorious.
If someone is global, then he is not elegant, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jonathan is global once knowing that Hardy is hungry and Percival is not angry.
If there is someone who is either elegant or glorious, then Percival is angry.
If there is at least one people who is both not glorious and not angry, then Jonathan is elegant.
Percival being not angry and Percival being not confident imply that Jonathan is not elegant and Nicholas is glorious.
If there is at least one people who is not angry, then Jimmy is glorious.
Someone being both hungry and confident is equivalent to being global and glorious.
If there is at least one people who is elegant or not angry, then Hardy is glorious.
If someone who is not elegant is also not angry, then he is global.
Someone who is eithor not global or not hungry is always not confident. | Nicholas is global. | neutral |
Brock is funny.
Rufus is funny.
Paxton is funny.
Morton is not suitable.
Brock is not famous.
Sherwin is famous.
Morton is similar.
Colin is unfair.
Leonard is funny.
Brock is cloudy.
Paxton is cloudy.
Rufus is suitable.If there is at least one people who is unfair or not famous, then Sherwin is cloudy.
If there is someone who is both not similar and not funny, then Leonard is not unfair.
Someone is not funny if and only if he is not famous.
If there is someone who is both not funny and not cloudy, then Brock is not suitable and Paxton is not similar.
If there is at least one people who is both not similar and not famous, then Brock is not funny.
If someone is not unfair, then he is not suitable.
Morton being famous is equivalent to Morton being funny.
If someone is funny, then he is both not unfair and suitable.
If there is someone who is both not unfair and not funny, then Leonard is not suitable.
If Rufus is funny, then Leonard is cloudy and Paxton is not unfair.
If someone is suitable, then he is both unfair and similar.
If Brock is not famous, then Brock is not suitable. | Sherwin is funny. | neutral |
Brock is funny.
Rufus is funny.
Paxton is funny.
Morton is not suitable.
Brock is not famous.
Sherwin is famous.
Morton is similar.
Colin is unfair.
Leonard is funny.
Brock is cloudy.
Paxton is cloudy.
Rufus is suitable.If there is at least one people who is unfair or not famous, then Sherwin is cloudy.
If there is someone who is both not similar and not funny, then Leonard is not unfair.
Someone is not funny if and only if he is not famous.
If there is someone who is both not funny and not cloudy, then Brock is not suitable and Paxton is not similar.
If there is at least one people who is both not similar and not famous, then Brock is not funny.
If someone is not unfair, then he is not suitable.
Morton being famous is equivalent to Morton being funny.
If someone is funny, then he is both not unfair and suitable.
If there is someone who is both not unfair and not funny, then Leonard is not suitable.
If Rufus is funny, then Leonard is cloudy and Paxton is not unfair.
If someone is suitable, then he is both unfair and similar.
If Brock is not famous, then Brock is not suitable. | Paxton is not suitable. | self_contradiction |
Brock is funny.
Rufus is funny.
Paxton is funny.
Morton is not suitable.
Brock is not famous.
Sherwin is famous.
Morton is similar.
Colin is unfair.
Leonard is funny.
Brock is cloudy.
Paxton is cloudy.
Rufus is suitable.If there is at least one people who is unfair or not famous, then Sherwin is cloudy.
If there is someone who is both not similar and not funny, then Leonard is not unfair.
Someone is not funny if and only if he is not famous.
If there is someone who is both not funny and not cloudy, then Brock is not suitable and Paxton is not similar.
If there is at least one people who is both not similar and not famous, then Brock is not funny.
If someone is not unfair, then he is not suitable.
Morton being famous is equivalent to Morton being funny.
If someone is funny, then he is both not unfair and suitable.
If there is someone who is both not unfair and not funny, then Leonard is not suitable.
If Rufus is funny, then Leonard is cloudy and Paxton is not unfair.
If someone is suitable, then he is both unfair and similar.
If Brock is not famous, then Brock is not suitable. | Colin is funny. | neutral |
Brock is funny.
Rufus is funny.
Paxton is funny.
Morton is not suitable.
Brock is not famous.
Sherwin is famous.
Morton is similar.
Colin is unfair.
Leonard is funny.
Brock is cloudy.
Paxton is cloudy.
Rufus is suitable.If there is at least one people who is unfair or not famous, then Sherwin is cloudy.
If there is someone who is both not similar and not funny, then Leonard is not unfair.
Someone is not funny if and only if he is not famous.
If there is someone who is both not funny and not cloudy, then Brock is not suitable and Paxton is not similar.
If there is at least one people who is both not similar and not famous, then Brock is not funny.
If someone is not unfair, then he is not suitable.
Morton being famous is equivalent to Morton being funny.
If someone is funny, then he is both not unfair and suitable.
If there is someone who is both not unfair and not funny, then Leonard is not suitable.
If Rufus is funny, then Leonard is cloudy and Paxton is not unfair.
If someone is suitable, then he is both unfair and similar.
If Brock is not famous, then Brock is not suitable. | Rufus is not suitable. | self_contradiction |
Brock is funny.
Rufus is funny.
Paxton is funny.
Morton is not suitable.
Brock is not famous.
Sherwin is famous.
Morton is similar.
Colin is unfair.
Leonard is funny.
Brock is cloudy.
Paxton is cloudy.
Rufus is suitable.If there is at least one people who is unfair or not famous, then Sherwin is cloudy.
If there is someone who is both not similar and not funny, then Leonard is not unfair.
Someone is not funny if and only if he is not famous.
If there is someone who is both not funny and not cloudy, then Brock is not suitable and Paxton is not similar.
If there is at least one people who is both not similar and not famous, then Brock is not funny.
If someone is not unfair, then he is not suitable.
Morton being famous is equivalent to Morton being funny.
If someone is funny, then he is both not unfair and suitable.
If there is someone who is both not unfair and not funny, then Leonard is not suitable.
If Rufus is funny, then Leonard is cloudy and Paxton is not unfair.
If someone is suitable, then he is both unfair and similar.
If Brock is not famous, then Brock is not suitable. | Brock is similar. | entailment |
Brock is funny.
Rufus is funny.
Paxton is funny.
Morton is not suitable.
Brock is not famous.
Sherwin is famous.
Morton is similar.
Colin is unfair.
Leonard is funny.
Brock is cloudy.
Paxton is cloudy.
Rufus is suitable.If there is at least one people who is unfair or not famous, then Sherwin is cloudy.
If there is someone who is both not similar and not funny, then Leonard is not unfair.
Someone is not funny if and only if he is not famous.
If there is someone who is both not funny and not cloudy, then Brock is not suitable and Paxton is not similar.
If there is at least one people who is both not similar and not famous, then Brock is not funny.
If someone is not unfair, then he is not suitable.
Morton being famous is equivalent to Morton being funny.
If someone is funny, then he is both not unfair and suitable.
If there is someone who is both not unfair and not funny, then Leonard is not suitable.
If Rufus is funny, then Leonard is cloudy and Paxton is not unfair.
If someone is suitable, then he is both unfair and similar.
If Brock is not famous, then Brock is not suitable. | Morton is not similar. | contradiction |
Brock is funny.
Rufus is funny.
Paxton is funny.
Morton is not suitable.
Brock is not famous.
Sherwin is famous.
Morton is similar.
Colin is unfair.
Leonard is funny.
Brock is cloudy.
Paxton is cloudy.
Rufus is suitable.If there is at least one people who is unfair or not famous, then Sherwin is cloudy.
If there is someone who is both not similar and not funny, then Leonard is not unfair.
Someone is not funny if and only if he is not famous.
If there is someone who is both not funny and not cloudy, then Brock is not suitable and Paxton is not similar.
If there is at least one people who is both not similar and not famous, then Brock is not funny.
If someone is not unfair, then he is not suitable.
Morton being famous is equivalent to Morton being funny.
If someone is funny, then he is both not unfair and suitable.
If there is someone who is both not unfair and not funny, then Leonard is not suitable.
If Rufus is funny, then Leonard is cloudy and Paxton is not unfair.
If someone is suitable, then he is both unfair and similar.
If Brock is not famous, then Brock is not suitable. | Paxton is funny. | entailment |
Brock is funny.
Rufus is funny.
Paxton is funny.
Morton is not suitable.
Brock is not famous.
Sherwin is famous.
Morton is similar.
Colin is unfair.
Leonard is funny.
Brock is cloudy.
Paxton is cloudy.
Rufus is suitable.If there is at least one people who is unfair or not famous, then Sherwin is cloudy.
If there is someone who is both not similar and not funny, then Leonard is not unfair.
Someone is not funny if and only if he is not famous.
If there is someone who is both not funny and not cloudy, then Brock is not suitable and Paxton is not similar.
If there is at least one people who is both not similar and not famous, then Brock is not funny.
If someone is not unfair, then he is not suitable.
Morton being famous is equivalent to Morton being funny.
If someone is funny, then he is both not unfair and suitable.
If there is someone who is both not unfair and not funny, then Leonard is not suitable.
If Rufus is funny, then Leonard is cloudy and Paxton is not unfair.
If someone is suitable, then he is both unfair and similar.
If Brock is not famous, then Brock is not suitable. | Brock is famous. | contradiction |
Brock is funny.
Rufus is funny.
Paxton is funny.
Morton is not suitable.
Brock is not famous.
Sherwin is famous.
Morton is similar.
Colin is unfair.
Leonard is funny.
Brock is cloudy.
Paxton is cloudy.
Rufus is suitable.If there is at least one people who is unfair or not famous, then Sherwin is cloudy.
If there is someone who is both not similar and not funny, then Leonard is not unfair.
Someone is not funny if and only if he is not famous.
If there is someone who is both not funny and not cloudy, then Brock is not suitable and Paxton is not similar.
If there is at least one people who is both not similar and not famous, then Brock is not funny.
If someone is not unfair, then he is not suitable.
Morton being famous is equivalent to Morton being funny.
If someone is funny, then he is both not unfair and suitable.
If there is someone who is both not unfair and not funny, then Leonard is not suitable.
If Rufus is funny, then Leonard is cloudy and Paxton is not unfair.
If someone is suitable, then he is both unfair and similar.
If Brock is not famous, then Brock is not suitable. | Colin is not funny. | neutral |
Brock is funny.
Rufus is funny.
Paxton is funny.
Morton is not suitable.
Brock is not famous.
Sherwin is famous.
Morton is similar.
Colin is unfair.
Leonard is funny.
Brock is cloudy.
Paxton is cloudy.
Rufus is suitable.If there is at least one people who is unfair or not famous, then Sherwin is cloudy.
If there is someone who is both not similar and not funny, then Leonard is not unfair.
Someone is not funny if and only if he is not famous.
If there is someone who is both not funny and not cloudy, then Brock is not suitable and Paxton is not similar.
If there is at least one people who is both not similar and not famous, then Brock is not funny.
If someone is not unfair, then he is not suitable.
Morton being famous is equivalent to Morton being funny.
If someone is funny, then he is both not unfair and suitable.
If there is someone who is both not unfair and not funny, then Leonard is not suitable.
If Rufus is funny, then Leonard is cloudy and Paxton is not unfair.
If someone is suitable, then he is both unfair and similar.
If Brock is not famous, then Brock is not suitable. | Leonard is not unfair. | self_contradiction |
Brock is funny.
Rufus is funny.
Paxton is funny.
Morton is not suitable.
Brock is not famous.
Sherwin is famous.
Morton is similar.
Colin is unfair.
Leonard is funny.
Brock is cloudy.
Paxton is cloudy.
Rufus is suitable.If there is at least one people who is unfair or not famous, then Sherwin is cloudy.
If there is someone who is both not similar and not funny, then Leonard is not unfair.
Someone is not funny if and only if he is not famous.
If there is someone who is both not funny and not cloudy, then Brock is not suitable and Paxton is not similar.
If there is at least one people who is both not similar and not famous, then Brock is not funny.
If someone is not unfair, then he is not suitable.
Morton being famous is equivalent to Morton being funny.
If someone is funny, then he is both not unfair and suitable.
If there is someone who is both not unfair and not funny, then Leonard is not suitable.
If Rufus is funny, then Leonard is cloudy and Paxton is not unfair.
If someone is suitable, then he is both unfair and similar.
If Brock is not famous, then Brock is not suitable. | Leonard is unfair. | self_contradiction |
Brock is funny.
Rufus is funny.
Paxton is funny.
Morton is not suitable.
Brock is not famous.
Sherwin is famous.
Morton is similar.
Colin is unfair.
Leonard is funny.
Brock is cloudy.
Paxton is cloudy.
Rufus is suitable.If there is at least one people who is unfair or not famous, then Sherwin is cloudy.
If there is someone who is both not similar and not funny, then Leonard is not unfair.
Someone is not funny if and only if he is not famous.
If there is someone who is both not funny and not cloudy, then Brock is not suitable and Paxton is not similar.
If there is at least one people who is both not similar and not famous, then Brock is not funny.
If someone is not unfair, then he is not suitable.
Morton being famous is equivalent to Morton being funny.
If someone is funny, then he is both not unfair and suitable.
If there is someone who is both not unfair and not funny, then Leonard is not suitable.
If Rufus is funny, then Leonard is cloudy and Paxton is not unfair.
If someone is suitable, then he is both unfair and similar.
If Brock is not famous, then Brock is not suitable. | Paxton is not funny. | contradiction |
Brock is funny.
Rufus is funny.
Paxton is funny.
Morton is not suitable.
Brock is not famous.
Sherwin is famous.
Morton is similar.
Colin is unfair.
Leonard is funny.
Brock is cloudy.
Paxton is cloudy.
Rufus is suitable.If there is at least one people who is unfair or not famous, then Sherwin is cloudy.
If there is someone who is both not similar and not funny, then Leonard is not unfair.
Someone is not funny if and only if he is not famous.
If there is someone who is both not funny and not cloudy, then Brock is not suitable and Paxton is not similar.
If there is at least one people who is both not similar and not famous, then Brock is not funny.
If someone is not unfair, then he is not suitable.
Morton being famous is equivalent to Morton being funny.
If someone is funny, then he is both not unfair and suitable.
If there is someone who is both not unfair and not funny, then Leonard is not suitable.
If Rufus is funny, then Leonard is cloudy and Paxton is not unfair.
If someone is suitable, then he is both unfair and similar.
If Brock is not famous, then Brock is not suitable. | Rufus is famous. | neutral |
Brock is funny.
Rufus is funny.
Paxton is funny.
Morton is not suitable.
Brock is not famous.
Sherwin is famous.
Morton is similar.
Colin is unfair.
Leonard is funny.
Brock is cloudy.
Paxton is cloudy.
Rufus is suitable.If there is at least one people who is unfair or not famous, then Sherwin is cloudy.
If there is someone who is both not similar and not funny, then Leonard is not unfair.
Someone is not funny if and only if he is not famous.
If there is someone who is both not funny and not cloudy, then Brock is not suitable and Paxton is not similar.
If there is at least one people who is both not similar and not famous, then Brock is not funny.
If someone is not unfair, then he is not suitable.
Morton being famous is equivalent to Morton being funny.
If someone is funny, then he is both not unfair and suitable.
If there is someone who is both not unfair and not funny, then Leonard is not suitable.
If Rufus is funny, then Leonard is cloudy and Paxton is not unfair.
If someone is suitable, then he is both unfair and similar.
If Brock is not famous, then Brock is not suitable. | Leonard is not cloudy. | contradiction |
Brock is funny.
Rufus is funny.
Paxton is funny.
Morton is not suitable.
Brock is not famous.
Sherwin is famous.
Morton is similar.
Colin is unfair.
Leonard is funny.
Brock is cloudy.
Paxton is cloudy.
Rufus is suitable.If there is at least one people who is unfair or not famous, then Sherwin is cloudy.
If there is someone who is both not similar and not funny, then Leonard is not unfair.
Someone is not funny if and only if he is not famous.
If there is someone who is both not funny and not cloudy, then Brock is not suitable and Paxton is not similar.
If there is at least one people who is both not similar and not famous, then Brock is not funny.
If someone is not unfair, then he is not suitable.
Morton being famous is equivalent to Morton being funny.
If someone is funny, then he is both not unfair and suitable.
If there is someone who is both not unfair and not funny, then Leonard is not suitable.
If Rufus is funny, then Leonard is cloudy and Paxton is not unfair.
If someone is suitable, then he is both unfair and similar.
If Brock is not famous, then Brock is not suitable. | Sherwin is suitable. | neutral |
Brock is funny.
Rufus is funny.
Paxton is funny.
Morton is not suitable.
Brock is not famous.
Sherwin is famous.
Morton is similar.
Colin is unfair.
Leonard is funny.
Brock is cloudy.
Paxton is cloudy.
Rufus is suitable.If there is at least one people who is unfair or not famous, then Sherwin is cloudy.
If there is someone who is both not similar and not funny, then Leonard is not unfair.
Someone is not funny if and only if he is not famous.
If there is someone who is both not funny and not cloudy, then Brock is not suitable and Paxton is not similar.
If there is at least one people who is both not similar and not famous, then Brock is not funny.
If someone is not unfair, then he is not suitable.
Morton being famous is equivalent to Morton being funny.
If someone is funny, then he is both not unfair and suitable.
If there is someone who is both not unfair and not funny, then Leonard is not suitable.
If Rufus is funny, then Leonard is cloudy and Paxton is not unfair.
If someone is suitable, then he is both unfair and similar.
If Brock is not famous, then Brock is not suitable. | Morton is suitable. | contradiction |
Brock is funny.
Rufus is funny.
Paxton is funny.
Morton is not suitable.
Brock is not famous.
Sherwin is famous.
Morton is similar.
Colin is unfair.
Leonard is funny.
Brock is cloudy.
Paxton is cloudy.
Rufus is suitable.If there is at least one people who is unfair or not famous, then Sherwin is cloudy.
If there is someone who is both not similar and not funny, then Leonard is not unfair.
Someone is not funny if and only if he is not famous.
If there is someone who is both not funny and not cloudy, then Brock is not suitable and Paxton is not similar.
If there is at least one people who is both not similar and not famous, then Brock is not funny.
If someone is not unfair, then he is not suitable.
Morton being famous is equivalent to Morton being funny.
If someone is funny, then he is both not unfair and suitable.
If there is someone who is both not unfair and not funny, then Leonard is not suitable.
If Rufus is funny, then Leonard is cloudy and Paxton is not unfair.
If someone is suitable, then he is both unfair and similar.
If Brock is not famous, then Brock is not suitable. | Brock is not suitable. | self_contradiction |
Brock is funny.
Rufus is funny.
Paxton is funny.
Morton is not suitable.
Brock is not famous.
Sherwin is famous.
Morton is similar.
Colin is unfair.
Leonard is funny.
Brock is cloudy.
Paxton is cloudy.
Rufus is suitable.If there is at least one people who is unfair or not famous, then Sherwin is cloudy.
If there is someone who is both not similar and not funny, then Leonard is not unfair.
Someone is not funny if and only if he is not famous.
If there is someone who is both not funny and not cloudy, then Brock is not suitable and Paxton is not similar.
If there is at least one people who is both not similar and not famous, then Brock is not funny.
If someone is not unfair, then he is not suitable.
Morton being famous is equivalent to Morton being funny.
If someone is funny, then he is both not unfair and suitable.
If there is someone who is both not unfair and not funny, then Leonard is not suitable.
If Rufus is funny, then Leonard is cloudy and Paxton is not unfair.
If someone is suitable, then he is both unfair and similar.
If Brock is not famous, then Brock is not suitable. | Leonard is cloudy. | entailment |
Brock is funny.
Rufus is funny.
Paxton is funny.
Morton is not suitable.
Brock is not famous.
Sherwin is famous.
Morton is similar.
Colin is unfair.
Leonard is funny.
Brock is cloudy.
Paxton is cloudy.
Rufus is suitable.If there is at least one people who is unfair or not famous, then Sherwin is cloudy.
If there is someone who is both not similar and not funny, then Leonard is not unfair.
Someone is not funny if and only if he is not famous.
If there is someone who is both not funny and not cloudy, then Brock is not suitable and Paxton is not similar.
If there is at least one people who is both not similar and not famous, then Brock is not funny.
If someone is not unfair, then he is not suitable.
Morton being famous is equivalent to Morton being funny.
If someone is funny, then he is both not unfair and suitable.
If there is someone who is both not unfair and not funny, then Leonard is not suitable.
If Rufus is funny, then Leonard is cloudy and Paxton is not unfair.
If someone is suitable, then he is both unfair and similar.
If Brock is not famous, then Brock is not suitable. | Sherwin is cloudy. | entailment |
Brock is funny.
Rufus is funny.
Paxton is funny.
Morton is not suitable.
Brock is not famous.
Sherwin is famous.
Morton is similar.
Colin is unfair.
Leonard is funny.
Brock is cloudy.
Paxton is cloudy.
Rufus is suitable.If there is at least one people who is unfair or not famous, then Sherwin is cloudy.
If there is someone who is both not similar and not funny, then Leonard is not unfair.
Someone is not funny if and only if he is not famous.
If there is someone who is both not funny and not cloudy, then Brock is not suitable and Paxton is not similar.
If there is at least one people who is both not similar and not famous, then Brock is not funny.
If someone is not unfair, then he is not suitable.
Morton being famous is equivalent to Morton being funny.
If someone is funny, then he is both not unfair and suitable.
If there is someone who is both not unfair and not funny, then Leonard is not suitable.
If Rufus is funny, then Leonard is cloudy and Paxton is not unfair.
If someone is suitable, then he is both unfair and similar.
If Brock is not famous, then Brock is not suitable. | Leonard is funny. | entailment |
Igor is not outrageous.
Hannah is small.
Hannah is mental.
Maribel is outrageous.
Maribel is not tame.
Hannah is not friendly.
Igor is small.
Herbert is not outrageous.
Herbert is friendly.
Maribel is small.
Maribel is embarrassed.
Roy is tame.If Hannah is embarrassed, then Roy is not mental.
If there is someone who is either not outrageous or mental, then Hannah is not small and Collier is friendly.
As long as someone is mental, he is not friendly and not small.
Someone who is not embarrassed is always not mental.
Maribel being outrageous or Herbert being tame implies that Collier is friendly.
It can be concluded that Collier is small once knowing that Hannah is not friendly and Collier is tame.
If there is at least one people who is mental, then Hannah is not embarrassed and Hannah is small.
If Collier is outrageous or Maribel is not tame, then Hannah is small.
If there is someone who is not mental, then Maribel is embarrassed.
As long as someone is friendly, he is outrageous and not tame.
If Roy is tame and Maribel is not outrageous, then Herbert is friendly.
As long as someone is not embarrassed, he is not outrageous and friendly. | Maribel is outrageous. | entailment |
Igor is not outrageous.
Hannah is small.
Hannah is mental.
Maribel is outrageous.
Maribel is not tame.
Hannah is not friendly.
Igor is small.
Herbert is not outrageous.
Herbert is friendly.
Maribel is small.
Maribel is embarrassed.
Roy is tame.If Hannah is embarrassed, then Roy is not mental.
If there is someone who is either not outrageous or mental, then Hannah is not small and Collier is friendly.
As long as someone is mental, he is not friendly and not small.
Someone who is not embarrassed is always not mental.
Maribel being outrageous or Herbert being tame implies that Collier is friendly.
It can be concluded that Collier is small once knowing that Hannah is not friendly and Collier is tame.
If there is at least one people who is mental, then Hannah is not embarrassed and Hannah is small.
If Collier is outrageous or Maribel is not tame, then Hannah is small.
If there is someone who is not mental, then Maribel is embarrassed.
As long as someone is friendly, he is outrageous and not tame.
If Roy is tame and Maribel is not outrageous, then Herbert is friendly.
As long as someone is not embarrassed, he is not outrageous and friendly. | Igor is not small. | contradiction |
Igor is not outrageous.
Hannah is small.
Hannah is mental.
Maribel is outrageous.
Maribel is not tame.
Hannah is not friendly.
Igor is small.
Herbert is not outrageous.
Herbert is friendly.
Maribel is small.
Maribel is embarrassed.
Roy is tame.If Hannah is embarrassed, then Roy is not mental.
If there is someone who is either not outrageous or mental, then Hannah is not small and Collier is friendly.
As long as someone is mental, he is not friendly and not small.
Someone who is not embarrassed is always not mental.
Maribel being outrageous or Herbert being tame implies that Collier is friendly.
It can be concluded that Collier is small once knowing that Hannah is not friendly and Collier is tame.
If there is at least one people who is mental, then Hannah is not embarrassed and Hannah is small.
If Collier is outrageous or Maribel is not tame, then Hannah is small.
If there is someone who is not mental, then Maribel is embarrassed.
As long as someone is friendly, he is outrageous and not tame.
If Roy is tame and Maribel is not outrageous, then Herbert is friendly.
As long as someone is not embarrassed, he is not outrageous and friendly. | Hannah is small. | self_contradiction |
Igor is not outrageous.
Hannah is small.
Hannah is mental.
Maribel is outrageous.
Maribel is not tame.
Hannah is not friendly.
Igor is small.
Herbert is not outrageous.
Herbert is friendly.
Maribel is small.
Maribel is embarrassed.
Roy is tame.If Hannah is embarrassed, then Roy is not mental.
If there is someone who is either not outrageous or mental, then Hannah is not small and Collier is friendly.
As long as someone is mental, he is not friendly and not small.
Someone who is not embarrassed is always not mental.
Maribel being outrageous or Herbert being tame implies that Collier is friendly.
It can be concluded that Collier is small once knowing that Hannah is not friendly and Collier is tame.
If there is at least one people who is mental, then Hannah is not embarrassed and Hannah is small.
If Collier is outrageous or Maribel is not tame, then Hannah is small.
If there is someone who is not mental, then Maribel is embarrassed.
As long as someone is friendly, he is outrageous and not tame.
If Roy is tame and Maribel is not outrageous, then Herbert is friendly.
As long as someone is not embarrassed, he is not outrageous and friendly. | Collier is tame. | contradiction |
Igor is not outrageous.
Hannah is small.
Hannah is mental.
Maribel is outrageous.
Maribel is not tame.
Hannah is not friendly.
Igor is small.
Herbert is not outrageous.
Herbert is friendly.
Maribel is small.
Maribel is embarrassed.
Roy is tame.If Hannah is embarrassed, then Roy is not mental.
If there is someone who is either not outrageous or mental, then Hannah is not small and Collier is friendly.
As long as someone is mental, he is not friendly and not small.
Someone who is not embarrassed is always not mental.
Maribel being outrageous or Herbert being tame implies that Collier is friendly.
It can be concluded that Collier is small once knowing that Hannah is not friendly and Collier is tame.
If there is at least one people who is mental, then Hannah is not embarrassed and Hannah is small.
If Collier is outrageous or Maribel is not tame, then Hannah is small.
If there is someone who is not mental, then Maribel is embarrassed.
As long as someone is friendly, he is outrageous and not tame.
If Roy is tame and Maribel is not outrageous, then Herbert is friendly.
As long as someone is not embarrassed, he is not outrageous and friendly. | Collier is not outrageous. | contradiction |
Igor is not outrageous.
Hannah is small.
Hannah is mental.
Maribel is outrageous.
Maribel is not tame.
Hannah is not friendly.
Igor is small.
Herbert is not outrageous.
Herbert is friendly.
Maribel is small.
Maribel is embarrassed.
Roy is tame.If Hannah is embarrassed, then Roy is not mental.
If there is someone who is either not outrageous or mental, then Hannah is not small and Collier is friendly.
As long as someone is mental, he is not friendly and not small.
Someone who is not embarrassed is always not mental.
Maribel being outrageous or Herbert being tame implies that Collier is friendly.
It can be concluded that Collier is small once knowing that Hannah is not friendly and Collier is tame.
If there is at least one people who is mental, then Hannah is not embarrassed and Hannah is small.
If Collier is outrageous or Maribel is not tame, then Hannah is small.
If there is someone who is not mental, then Maribel is embarrassed.
As long as someone is friendly, he is outrageous and not tame.
If Roy is tame and Maribel is not outrageous, then Herbert is friendly.
As long as someone is not embarrassed, he is not outrageous and friendly. | Hannah is mental. | self_contradiction |
Igor is not outrageous.
Hannah is small.
Hannah is mental.
Maribel is outrageous.
Maribel is not tame.
Hannah is not friendly.
Igor is small.
Herbert is not outrageous.
Herbert is friendly.
Maribel is small.
Maribel is embarrassed.
Roy is tame.If Hannah is embarrassed, then Roy is not mental.
If there is someone who is either not outrageous or mental, then Hannah is not small and Collier is friendly.
As long as someone is mental, he is not friendly and not small.
Someone who is not embarrassed is always not mental.
Maribel being outrageous or Herbert being tame implies that Collier is friendly.
It can be concluded that Collier is small once knowing that Hannah is not friendly and Collier is tame.
If there is at least one people who is mental, then Hannah is not embarrassed and Hannah is small.
If Collier is outrageous or Maribel is not tame, then Hannah is small.
If there is someone who is not mental, then Maribel is embarrassed.
As long as someone is friendly, he is outrageous and not tame.
If Roy is tame and Maribel is not outrageous, then Herbert is friendly.
As long as someone is not embarrassed, he is not outrageous and friendly. | Hannah is not outrageous. | self_contradiction |
Igor is not outrageous.
Hannah is small.
Hannah is mental.
Maribel is outrageous.
Maribel is not tame.
Hannah is not friendly.
Igor is small.
Herbert is not outrageous.
Herbert is friendly.
Maribel is small.
Maribel is embarrassed.
Roy is tame.If Hannah is embarrassed, then Roy is not mental.
If there is someone who is either not outrageous or mental, then Hannah is not small and Collier is friendly.
As long as someone is mental, he is not friendly and not small.
Someone who is not embarrassed is always not mental.
Maribel being outrageous or Herbert being tame implies that Collier is friendly.
It can be concluded that Collier is small once knowing that Hannah is not friendly and Collier is tame.
If there is at least one people who is mental, then Hannah is not embarrassed and Hannah is small.
If Collier is outrageous or Maribel is not tame, then Hannah is small.
If there is someone who is not mental, then Maribel is embarrassed.
As long as someone is friendly, he is outrageous and not tame.
If Roy is tame and Maribel is not outrageous, then Herbert is friendly.
As long as someone is not embarrassed, he is not outrageous and friendly. | Igor is small. | entailment |
Igor is not outrageous.
Hannah is small.
Hannah is mental.
Maribel is outrageous.
Maribel is not tame.
Hannah is not friendly.
Igor is small.
Herbert is not outrageous.
Herbert is friendly.
Maribel is small.
Maribel is embarrassed.
Roy is tame.If Hannah is embarrassed, then Roy is not mental.
If there is someone who is either not outrageous or mental, then Hannah is not small and Collier is friendly.
As long as someone is mental, he is not friendly and not small.
Someone who is not embarrassed is always not mental.
Maribel being outrageous or Herbert being tame implies that Collier is friendly.
It can be concluded that Collier is small once knowing that Hannah is not friendly and Collier is tame.
If there is at least one people who is mental, then Hannah is not embarrassed and Hannah is small.
If Collier is outrageous or Maribel is not tame, then Hannah is small.
If there is someone who is not mental, then Maribel is embarrassed.
As long as someone is friendly, he is outrageous and not tame.
If Roy is tame and Maribel is not outrageous, then Herbert is friendly.
As long as someone is not embarrassed, he is not outrageous and friendly. | Hannah is outrageous. | self_contradiction |
Igor is not outrageous.
Hannah is small.
Hannah is mental.
Maribel is outrageous.
Maribel is not tame.
Hannah is not friendly.
Igor is small.
Herbert is not outrageous.
Herbert is friendly.
Maribel is small.
Maribel is embarrassed.
Roy is tame.If Hannah is embarrassed, then Roy is not mental.
If there is someone who is either not outrageous or mental, then Hannah is not small and Collier is friendly.
As long as someone is mental, he is not friendly and not small.
Someone who is not embarrassed is always not mental.
Maribel being outrageous or Herbert being tame implies that Collier is friendly.
It can be concluded that Collier is small once knowing that Hannah is not friendly and Collier is tame.
If there is at least one people who is mental, then Hannah is not embarrassed and Hannah is small.
If Collier is outrageous or Maribel is not tame, then Hannah is small.
If there is someone who is not mental, then Maribel is embarrassed.
As long as someone is friendly, he is outrageous and not tame.
If Roy is tame and Maribel is not outrageous, then Herbert is friendly.
As long as someone is not embarrassed, he is not outrageous and friendly. | Maribel is small. | entailment |
Igor is not outrageous.
Hannah is small.
Hannah is mental.
Maribel is outrageous.
Maribel is not tame.
Hannah is not friendly.
Igor is small.
Herbert is not outrageous.
Herbert is friendly.
Maribel is small.
Maribel is embarrassed.
Roy is tame.If Hannah is embarrassed, then Roy is not mental.
If there is someone who is either not outrageous or mental, then Hannah is not small and Collier is friendly.
As long as someone is mental, he is not friendly and not small.
Someone who is not embarrassed is always not mental.
Maribel being outrageous or Herbert being tame implies that Collier is friendly.
It can be concluded that Collier is small once knowing that Hannah is not friendly and Collier is tame.
If there is at least one people who is mental, then Hannah is not embarrassed and Hannah is small.
If Collier is outrageous or Maribel is not tame, then Hannah is small.
If there is someone who is not mental, then Maribel is embarrassed.
As long as someone is friendly, he is outrageous and not tame.
If Roy is tame and Maribel is not outrageous, then Herbert is friendly.
As long as someone is not embarrassed, he is not outrageous and friendly. | Igor is embarrassed. | neutral |
Igor is not outrageous.
Hannah is small.
Hannah is mental.
Maribel is outrageous.
Maribel is not tame.
Hannah is not friendly.
Igor is small.
Herbert is not outrageous.
Herbert is friendly.
Maribel is small.
Maribel is embarrassed.
Roy is tame.If Hannah is embarrassed, then Roy is not mental.
If there is someone who is either not outrageous or mental, then Hannah is not small and Collier is friendly.
As long as someone is mental, he is not friendly and not small.
Someone who is not embarrassed is always not mental.
Maribel being outrageous or Herbert being tame implies that Collier is friendly.
It can be concluded that Collier is small once knowing that Hannah is not friendly and Collier is tame.
If there is at least one people who is mental, then Hannah is not embarrassed and Hannah is small.
If Collier is outrageous or Maribel is not tame, then Hannah is small.
If there is someone who is not mental, then Maribel is embarrassed.
As long as someone is friendly, he is outrageous and not tame.
If Roy is tame and Maribel is not outrageous, then Herbert is friendly.
As long as someone is not embarrassed, he is not outrageous and friendly. | Igor is not outrageous. | entailment |
Igor is not outrageous.
Hannah is small.
Hannah is mental.
Maribel is outrageous.
Maribel is not tame.
Hannah is not friendly.
Igor is small.
Herbert is not outrageous.
Herbert is friendly.
Maribel is small.
Maribel is embarrassed.
Roy is tame.If Hannah is embarrassed, then Roy is not mental.
If there is someone who is either not outrageous or mental, then Hannah is not small and Collier is friendly.
As long as someone is mental, he is not friendly and not small.
Someone who is not embarrassed is always not mental.
Maribel being outrageous or Herbert being tame implies that Collier is friendly.
It can be concluded that Collier is small once knowing that Hannah is not friendly and Collier is tame.
If there is at least one people who is mental, then Hannah is not embarrassed and Hannah is small.
If Collier is outrageous or Maribel is not tame, then Hannah is small.
If there is someone who is not mental, then Maribel is embarrassed.
As long as someone is friendly, he is outrageous and not tame.
If Roy is tame and Maribel is not outrageous, then Herbert is friendly.
As long as someone is not embarrassed, he is not outrageous and friendly. | Herbert is outrageous. | self_contradiction |
Igor is not outrageous.
Hannah is small.
Hannah is mental.
Maribel is outrageous.
Maribel is not tame.
Hannah is not friendly.
Igor is small.
Herbert is not outrageous.
Herbert is friendly.
Maribel is small.
Maribel is embarrassed.
Roy is tame.If Hannah is embarrassed, then Roy is not mental.
If there is someone who is either not outrageous or mental, then Hannah is not small and Collier is friendly.
As long as someone is mental, he is not friendly and not small.
Someone who is not embarrassed is always not mental.
Maribel being outrageous or Herbert being tame implies that Collier is friendly.
It can be concluded that Collier is small once knowing that Hannah is not friendly and Collier is tame.
If there is at least one people who is mental, then Hannah is not embarrassed and Hannah is small.
If Collier is outrageous or Maribel is not tame, then Hannah is small.
If there is someone who is not mental, then Maribel is embarrassed.
As long as someone is friendly, he is outrageous and not tame.
If Roy is tame and Maribel is not outrageous, then Herbert is friendly.
As long as someone is not embarrassed, he is not outrageous and friendly. | Roy is not small. | neutral |
Igor is not outrageous.
Hannah is small.
Hannah is mental.
Maribel is outrageous.
Maribel is not tame.
Hannah is not friendly.
Igor is small.
Herbert is not outrageous.
Herbert is friendly.
Maribel is small.
Maribel is embarrassed.
Roy is tame.If Hannah is embarrassed, then Roy is not mental.
If there is someone who is either not outrageous or mental, then Hannah is not small and Collier is friendly.
As long as someone is mental, he is not friendly and not small.
Someone who is not embarrassed is always not mental.
Maribel being outrageous or Herbert being tame implies that Collier is friendly.
It can be concluded that Collier is small once knowing that Hannah is not friendly and Collier is tame.
If there is at least one people who is mental, then Hannah is not embarrassed and Hannah is small.
If Collier is outrageous or Maribel is not tame, then Hannah is small.
If there is someone who is not mental, then Maribel is embarrassed.
As long as someone is friendly, he is outrageous and not tame.
If Roy is tame and Maribel is not outrageous, then Herbert is friendly.
As long as someone is not embarrassed, he is not outrageous and friendly. | Roy is not embarrassed. | neutral |
Igor is not outrageous.
Hannah is small.
Hannah is mental.
Maribel is outrageous.
Maribel is not tame.
Hannah is not friendly.
Igor is small.
Herbert is not outrageous.
Herbert is friendly.
Maribel is small.
Maribel is embarrassed.
Roy is tame.If Hannah is embarrassed, then Roy is not mental.
If there is someone who is either not outrageous or mental, then Hannah is not small and Collier is friendly.
As long as someone is mental, he is not friendly and not small.
Someone who is not embarrassed is always not mental.
Maribel being outrageous or Herbert being tame implies that Collier is friendly.
It can be concluded that Collier is small once knowing that Hannah is not friendly and Collier is tame.
If there is at least one people who is mental, then Hannah is not embarrassed and Hannah is small.
If Collier is outrageous or Maribel is not tame, then Hannah is small.
If there is someone who is not mental, then Maribel is embarrassed.
As long as someone is friendly, he is outrageous and not tame.
If Roy is tame and Maribel is not outrageous, then Herbert is friendly.
As long as someone is not embarrassed, he is not outrageous and friendly. | Roy is small. | neutral |
Igor is not outrageous.
Hannah is small.
Hannah is mental.
Maribel is outrageous.
Maribel is not tame.
Hannah is not friendly.
Igor is small.
Herbert is not outrageous.
Herbert is friendly.
Maribel is small.
Maribel is embarrassed.
Roy is tame.If Hannah is embarrassed, then Roy is not mental.
If there is someone who is either not outrageous or mental, then Hannah is not small and Collier is friendly.
As long as someone is mental, he is not friendly and not small.
Someone who is not embarrassed is always not mental.
Maribel being outrageous or Herbert being tame implies that Collier is friendly.
It can be concluded that Collier is small once knowing that Hannah is not friendly and Collier is tame.
If there is at least one people who is mental, then Hannah is not embarrassed and Hannah is small.
If Collier is outrageous or Maribel is not tame, then Hannah is small.
If there is someone who is not mental, then Maribel is embarrassed.
As long as someone is friendly, he is outrageous and not tame.
If Roy is tame and Maribel is not outrageous, then Herbert is friendly.
As long as someone is not embarrassed, he is not outrageous and friendly. | Igor is outrageous. | contradiction |
Igor is not outrageous.
Hannah is small.
Hannah is mental.
Maribel is outrageous.
Maribel is not tame.
Hannah is not friendly.
Igor is small.
Herbert is not outrageous.
Herbert is friendly.
Maribel is small.
Maribel is embarrassed.
Roy is tame.If Hannah is embarrassed, then Roy is not mental.
If there is someone who is either not outrageous or mental, then Hannah is not small and Collier is friendly.
As long as someone is mental, he is not friendly and not small.
Someone who is not embarrassed is always not mental.
Maribel being outrageous or Herbert being tame implies that Collier is friendly.
It can be concluded that Collier is small once knowing that Hannah is not friendly and Collier is tame.
If there is at least one people who is mental, then Hannah is not embarrassed and Hannah is small.
If Collier is outrageous or Maribel is not tame, then Hannah is small.
If there is someone who is not mental, then Maribel is embarrassed.
As long as someone is friendly, he is outrageous and not tame.
If Roy is tame and Maribel is not outrageous, then Herbert is friendly.
As long as someone is not embarrassed, he is not outrageous and friendly. | Roy is tame. | entailment |
Igor is not outrageous.
Hannah is small.
Hannah is mental.
Maribel is outrageous.
Maribel is not tame.
Hannah is not friendly.
Igor is small.
Herbert is not outrageous.
Herbert is friendly.
Maribel is small.
Maribel is embarrassed.
Roy is tame.If Hannah is embarrassed, then Roy is not mental.
If there is someone who is either not outrageous or mental, then Hannah is not small and Collier is friendly.
As long as someone is mental, he is not friendly and not small.
Someone who is not embarrassed is always not mental.
Maribel being outrageous or Herbert being tame implies that Collier is friendly.
It can be concluded that Collier is small once knowing that Hannah is not friendly and Collier is tame.
If there is at least one people who is mental, then Hannah is not embarrassed and Hannah is small.
If Collier is outrageous or Maribel is not tame, then Hannah is small.
If there is someone who is not mental, then Maribel is embarrassed.
As long as someone is friendly, he is outrageous and not tame.
If Roy is tame and Maribel is not outrageous, then Herbert is friendly.
As long as someone is not embarrassed, he is not outrageous and friendly. | Herbert is not small. | neutral |
Igor is not outrageous.
Hannah is small.
Hannah is mental.
Maribel is outrageous.
Maribel is not tame.
Hannah is not friendly.
Igor is small.
Herbert is not outrageous.
Herbert is friendly.
Maribel is small.
Maribel is embarrassed.
Roy is tame.If Hannah is embarrassed, then Roy is not mental.
If there is someone who is either not outrageous or mental, then Hannah is not small and Collier is friendly.
As long as someone is mental, he is not friendly and not small.
Someone who is not embarrassed is always not mental.
Maribel being outrageous or Herbert being tame implies that Collier is friendly.
It can be concluded that Collier is small once knowing that Hannah is not friendly and Collier is tame.
If there is at least one people who is mental, then Hannah is not embarrassed and Hannah is small.
If Collier is outrageous or Maribel is not tame, then Hannah is small.
If there is someone who is not mental, then Maribel is embarrassed.
As long as someone is friendly, he is outrageous and not tame.
If Roy is tame and Maribel is not outrageous, then Herbert is friendly.
As long as someone is not embarrassed, he is not outrageous and friendly. | Roy is not tame. | contradiction |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.