premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Kathie is not weak.
Thomas is ambitious.
Lionel is not purple.
Lionel is good.
Gloria is ambitious.
Hall is purple.
Gloria is purple.
Bowen is purple.
Ryan is not powerful.
Bowen is ambitious.
Lionel is not innocent.
Thomas is not good.As long as someone is not purple and not weak, he is not ambitious and not innocent.
Someone being powerful is equivalent to being not innocent.
If there is at least one people who is good or innocent, then Ryan is not powerful.
If there is someone who is not innocent, then Gloria is good and Thomas is powerful.
If Kathie is not ambitious and Ryan is innocent, then Gloria is not weak and Thomas is good.
If there is at least one people who is both ambitious and powerful, then Hall is weak.
Someone who is eithor not ambitious or not good is always not weak.
It can be concluded that Ryan is weak and Lionel is good once knowing that Ryan is not powerful.
If someone is not ambitious or he is not good, then he is purple.
If there is someone who is not ambitious, then Gloria is weak.
Someone who is not weak is always not purple.
If there is at least one people who is not weak, then Bowen is powerful and Thomas is good. | Thomas is not ambitious. | self_contradiction |
Kathie is not weak.
Thomas is ambitious.
Lionel is not purple.
Lionel is good.
Gloria is ambitious.
Hall is purple.
Gloria is purple.
Bowen is purple.
Ryan is not powerful.
Bowen is ambitious.
Lionel is not innocent.
Thomas is not good.As long as someone is not purple and not weak, he is not ambitious and not innocent.
Someone being powerful is equivalent to being not innocent.
If there is at least one people who is good or innocent, then Ryan is not powerful.
If there is someone who is not innocent, then Gloria is good and Thomas is powerful.
If Kathie is not ambitious and Ryan is innocent, then Gloria is not weak and Thomas is good.
If there is at least one people who is both ambitious and powerful, then Hall is weak.
Someone who is eithor not ambitious or not good is always not weak.
It can be concluded that Ryan is weak and Lionel is good once knowing that Ryan is not powerful.
If someone is not ambitious or he is not good, then he is purple.
If there is someone who is not ambitious, then Gloria is weak.
Someone who is not weak is always not purple.
If there is at least one people who is not weak, then Bowen is powerful and Thomas is good. | Kathie is purple. | self_contradiction |
Kathie is not weak.
Thomas is ambitious.
Lionel is not purple.
Lionel is good.
Gloria is ambitious.
Hall is purple.
Gloria is purple.
Bowen is purple.
Ryan is not powerful.
Bowen is ambitious.
Lionel is not innocent.
Thomas is not good.As long as someone is not purple and not weak, he is not ambitious and not innocent.
Someone being powerful is equivalent to being not innocent.
If there is at least one people who is good or innocent, then Ryan is not powerful.
If there is someone who is not innocent, then Gloria is good and Thomas is powerful.
If Kathie is not ambitious and Ryan is innocent, then Gloria is not weak and Thomas is good.
If there is at least one people who is both ambitious and powerful, then Hall is weak.
Someone who is eithor not ambitious or not good is always not weak.
It can be concluded that Ryan is weak and Lionel is good once knowing that Ryan is not powerful.
If someone is not ambitious or he is not good, then he is purple.
If there is someone who is not ambitious, then Gloria is weak.
Someone who is not weak is always not purple.
If there is at least one people who is not weak, then Bowen is powerful and Thomas is good. | Thomas is weak. | contradiction |
Kathie is not weak.
Thomas is ambitious.
Lionel is not purple.
Lionel is good.
Gloria is ambitious.
Hall is purple.
Gloria is purple.
Bowen is purple.
Ryan is not powerful.
Bowen is ambitious.
Lionel is not innocent.
Thomas is not good.As long as someone is not purple and not weak, he is not ambitious and not innocent.
Someone being powerful is equivalent to being not innocent.
If there is at least one people who is good or innocent, then Ryan is not powerful.
If there is someone who is not innocent, then Gloria is good and Thomas is powerful.
If Kathie is not ambitious and Ryan is innocent, then Gloria is not weak and Thomas is good.
If there is at least one people who is both ambitious and powerful, then Hall is weak.
Someone who is eithor not ambitious or not good is always not weak.
It can be concluded that Ryan is weak and Lionel is good once knowing that Ryan is not powerful.
If someone is not ambitious or he is not good, then he is purple.
If there is someone who is not ambitious, then Gloria is weak.
Someone who is not weak is always not purple.
If there is at least one people who is not weak, then Bowen is powerful and Thomas is good. | Hall is weak. | entailment |
Kathie is not weak.
Thomas is ambitious.
Lionel is not purple.
Lionel is good.
Gloria is ambitious.
Hall is purple.
Gloria is purple.
Bowen is purple.
Ryan is not powerful.
Bowen is ambitious.
Lionel is not innocent.
Thomas is not good.As long as someone is not purple and not weak, he is not ambitious and not innocent.
Someone being powerful is equivalent to being not innocent.
If there is at least one people who is good or innocent, then Ryan is not powerful.
If there is someone who is not innocent, then Gloria is good and Thomas is powerful.
If Kathie is not ambitious and Ryan is innocent, then Gloria is not weak and Thomas is good.
If there is at least one people who is both ambitious and powerful, then Hall is weak.
Someone who is eithor not ambitious or not good is always not weak.
It can be concluded that Ryan is weak and Lionel is good once knowing that Ryan is not powerful.
If someone is not ambitious or he is not good, then he is purple.
If there is someone who is not ambitious, then Gloria is weak.
Someone who is not weak is always not purple.
If there is at least one people who is not weak, then Bowen is powerful and Thomas is good. | Thomas is not good. | self_contradiction |
Kathie is not weak.
Thomas is ambitious.
Lionel is not purple.
Lionel is good.
Gloria is ambitious.
Hall is purple.
Gloria is purple.
Bowen is purple.
Ryan is not powerful.
Bowen is ambitious.
Lionel is not innocent.
Thomas is not good.As long as someone is not purple and not weak, he is not ambitious and not innocent.
Someone being powerful is equivalent to being not innocent.
If there is at least one people who is good or innocent, then Ryan is not powerful.
If there is someone who is not innocent, then Gloria is good and Thomas is powerful.
If Kathie is not ambitious and Ryan is innocent, then Gloria is not weak and Thomas is good.
If there is at least one people who is both ambitious and powerful, then Hall is weak.
Someone who is eithor not ambitious or not good is always not weak.
It can be concluded that Ryan is weak and Lionel is good once knowing that Ryan is not powerful.
If someone is not ambitious or he is not good, then he is purple.
If there is someone who is not ambitious, then Gloria is weak.
Someone who is not weak is always not purple.
If there is at least one people who is not weak, then Bowen is powerful and Thomas is good. | Ryan is not powerful. | entailment |
Kathie is not weak.
Thomas is ambitious.
Lionel is not purple.
Lionel is good.
Gloria is ambitious.
Hall is purple.
Gloria is purple.
Bowen is purple.
Ryan is not powerful.
Bowen is ambitious.
Lionel is not innocent.
Thomas is not good.As long as someone is not purple and not weak, he is not ambitious and not innocent.
Someone being powerful is equivalent to being not innocent.
If there is at least one people who is good or innocent, then Ryan is not powerful.
If there is someone who is not innocent, then Gloria is good and Thomas is powerful.
If Kathie is not ambitious and Ryan is innocent, then Gloria is not weak and Thomas is good.
If there is at least one people who is both ambitious and powerful, then Hall is weak.
Someone who is eithor not ambitious or not good is always not weak.
It can be concluded that Ryan is weak and Lionel is good once knowing that Ryan is not powerful.
If someone is not ambitious or he is not good, then he is purple.
If there is someone who is not ambitious, then Gloria is weak.
Someone who is not weak is always not purple.
If there is at least one people who is not weak, then Bowen is powerful and Thomas is good. | Bowen is ambitious. | entailment |
Kathie is not weak.
Thomas is ambitious.
Lionel is not purple.
Lionel is good.
Gloria is ambitious.
Hall is purple.
Gloria is purple.
Bowen is purple.
Ryan is not powerful.
Bowen is ambitious.
Lionel is not innocent.
Thomas is not good.As long as someone is not purple and not weak, he is not ambitious and not innocent.
Someone being powerful is equivalent to being not innocent.
If there is at least one people who is good or innocent, then Ryan is not powerful.
If there is someone who is not innocent, then Gloria is good and Thomas is powerful.
If Kathie is not ambitious and Ryan is innocent, then Gloria is not weak and Thomas is good.
If there is at least one people who is both ambitious and powerful, then Hall is weak.
Someone who is eithor not ambitious or not good is always not weak.
It can be concluded that Ryan is weak and Lionel is good once knowing that Ryan is not powerful.
If someone is not ambitious or he is not good, then he is purple.
If there is someone who is not ambitious, then Gloria is weak.
Someone who is not weak is always not purple.
If there is at least one people who is not weak, then Bowen is powerful and Thomas is good. | Gloria is not purple. | contradiction |
Kathie is not weak.
Thomas is ambitious.
Lionel is not purple.
Lionel is good.
Gloria is ambitious.
Hall is purple.
Gloria is purple.
Bowen is purple.
Ryan is not powerful.
Bowen is ambitious.
Lionel is not innocent.
Thomas is not good.As long as someone is not purple and not weak, he is not ambitious and not innocent.
Someone being powerful is equivalent to being not innocent.
If there is at least one people who is good or innocent, then Ryan is not powerful.
If there is someone who is not innocent, then Gloria is good and Thomas is powerful.
If Kathie is not ambitious and Ryan is innocent, then Gloria is not weak and Thomas is good.
If there is at least one people who is both ambitious and powerful, then Hall is weak.
Someone who is eithor not ambitious or not good is always not weak.
It can be concluded that Ryan is weak and Lionel is good once knowing that Ryan is not powerful.
If someone is not ambitious or he is not good, then he is purple.
If there is someone who is not ambitious, then Gloria is weak.
Someone who is not weak is always not purple.
If there is at least one people who is not weak, then Bowen is powerful and Thomas is good. | Ryan is weak. | entailment |
Kathie is not weak.
Thomas is ambitious.
Lionel is not purple.
Lionel is good.
Gloria is ambitious.
Hall is purple.
Gloria is purple.
Bowen is purple.
Ryan is not powerful.
Bowen is ambitious.
Lionel is not innocent.
Thomas is not good.As long as someone is not purple and not weak, he is not ambitious and not innocent.
Someone being powerful is equivalent to being not innocent.
If there is at least one people who is good or innocent, then Ryan is not powerful.
If there is someone who is not innocent, then Gloria is good and Thomas is powerful.
If Kathie is not ambitious and Ryan is innocent, then Gloria is not weak and Thomas is good.
If there is at least one people who is both ambitious and powerful, then Hall is weak.
Someone who is eithor not ambitious or not good is always not weak.
It can be concluded that Ryan is weak and Lionel is good once knowing that Ryan is not powerful.
If someone is not ambitious or he is not good, then he is purple.
If there is someone who is not ambitious, then Gloria is weak.
Someone who is not weak is always not purple.
If there is at least one people who is not weak, then Bowen is powerful and Thomas is good. | Thomas is innocent. | contradiction |
Kathie is not weak.
Thomas is ambitious.
Lionel is not purple.
Lionel is good.
Gloria is ambitious.
Hall is purple.
Gloria is purple.
Bowen is purple.
Ryan is not powerful.
Bowen is ambitious.
Lionel is not innocent.
Thomas is not good.As long as someone is not purple and not weak, he is not ambitious and not innocent.
Someone being powerful is equivalent to being not innocent.
If there is at least one people who is good or innocent, then Ryan is not powerful.
If there is someone who is not innocent, then Gloria is good and Thomas is powerful.
If Kathie is not ambitious and Ryan is innocent, then Gloria is not weak and Thomas is good.
If there is at least one people who is both ambitious and powerful, then Hall is weak.
Someone who is eithor not ambitious or not good is always not weak.
It can be concluded that Ryan is weak and Lionel is good once knowing that Ryan is not powerful.
If someone is not ambitious or he is not good, then he is purple.
If there is someone who is not ambitious, then Gloria is weak.
Someone who is not weak is always not purple.
If there is at least one people who is not weak, then Bowen is powerful and Thomas is good. | Gloria is not powerful. | neutral |
Kathie is not weak.
Thomas is ambitious.
Lionel is not purple.
Lionel is good.
Gloria is ambitious.
Hall is purple.
Gloria is purple.
Bowen is purple.
Ryan is not powerful.
Bowen is ambitious.
Lionel is not innocent.
Thomas is not good.As long as someone is not purple and not weak, he is not ambitious and not innocent.
Someone being powerful is equivalent to being not innocent.
If there is at least one people who is good or innocent, then Ryan is not powerful.
If there is someone who is not innocent, then Gloria is good and Thomas is powerful.
If Kathie is not ambitious and Ryan is innocent, then Gloria is not weak and Thomas is good.
If there is at least one people who is both ambitious and powerful, then Hall is weak.
Someone who is eithor not ambitious or not good is always not weak.
It can be concluded that Ryan is weak and Lionel is good once knowing that Ryan is not powerful.
If someone is not ambitious or he is not good, then he is purple.
If there is someone who is not ambitious, then Gloria is weak.
Someone who is not weak is always not purple.
If there is at least one people who is not weak, then Bowen is powerful and Thomas is good. | Thomas is ambitious. | self_contradiction |
Kathie is not weak.
Thomas is ambitious.
Lionel is not purple.
Lionel is good.
Gloria is ambitious.
Hall is purple.
Gloria is purple.
Bowen is purple.
Ryan is not powerful.
Bowen is ambitious.
Lionel is not innocent.
Thomas is not good.As long as someone is not purple and not weak, he is not ambitious and not innocent.
Someone being powerful is equivalent to being not innocent.
If there is at least one people who is good or innocent, then Ryan is not powerful.
If there is someone who is not innocent, then Gloria is good and Thomas is powerful.
If Kathie is not ambitious and Ryan is innocent, then Gloria is not weak and Thomas is good.
If there is at least one people who is both ambitious and powerful, then Hall is weak.
Someone who is eithor not ambitious or not good is always not weak.
It can be concluded that Ryan is weak and Lionel is good once knowing that Ryan is not powerful.
If someone is not ambitious or he is not good, then he is purple.
If there is someone who is not ambitious, then Gloria is weak.
Someone who is not weak is always not purple.
If there is at least one people who is not weak, then Bowen is powerful and Thomas is good. | Thomas is not innocent. | entailment |
Kathie is not weak.
Thomas is ambitious.
Lionel is not purple.
Lionel is good.
Gloria is ambitious.
Hall is purple.
Gloria is purple.
Bowen is purple.
Ryan is not powerful.
Bowen is ambitious.
Lionel is not innocent.
Thomas is not good.As long as someone is not purple and not weak, he is not ambitious and not innocent.
Someone being powerful is equivalent to being not innocent.
If there is at least one people who is good or innocent, then Ryan is not powerful.
If there is someone who is not innocent, then Gloria is good and Thomas is powerful.
If Kathie is not ambitious and Ryan is innocent, then Gloria is not weak and Thomas is good.
If there is at least one people who is both ambitious and powerful, then Hall is weak.
Someone who is eithor not ambitious or not good is always not weak.
It can be concluded that Ryan is weak and Lionel is good once knowing that Ryan is not powerful.
If someone is not ambitious or he is not good, then he is purple.
If there is someone who is not ambitious, then Gloria is weak.
Someone who is not weak is always not purple.
If there is at least one people who is not weak, then Bowen is powerful and Thomas is good. | Gloria is not ambitious. | contradiction |
Kathie is not weak.
Thomas is ambitious.
Lionel is not purple.
Lionel is good.
Gloria is ambitious.
Hall is purple.
Gloria is purple.
Bowen is purple.
Ryan is not powerful.
Bowen is ambitious.
Lionel is not innocent.
Thomas is not good.As long as someone is not purple and not weak, he is not ambitious and not innocent.
Someone being powerful is equivalent to being not innocent.
If there is at least one people who is good or innocent, then Ryan is not powerful.
If there is someone who is not innocent, then Gloria is good and Thomas is powerful.
If Kathie is not ambitious and Ryan is innocent, then Gloria is not weak and Thomas is good.
If there is at least one people who is both ambitious and powerful, then Hall is weak.
Someone who is eithor not ambitious or not good is always not weak.
It can be concluded that Ryan is weak and Lionel is good once knowing that Ryan is not powerful.
If someone is not ambitious or he is not good, then he is purple.
If there is someone who is not ambitious, then Gloria is weak.
Someone who is not weak is always not purple.
If there is at least one people who is not weak, then Bowen is powerful and Thomas is good. | Thomas is not purple. | self_contradiction |
Kathie is not weak.
Thomas is ambitious.
Lionel is not purple.
Lionel is good.
Gloria is ambitious.
Hall is purple.
Gloria is purple.
Bowen is purple.
Ryan is not powerful.
Bowen is ambitious.
Lionel is not innocent.
Thomas is not good.As long as someone is not purple and not weak, he is not ambitious and not innocent.
Someone being powerful is equivalent to being not innocent.
If there is at least one people who is good or innocent, then Ryan is not powerful.
If there is someone who is not innocent, then Gloria is good and Thomas is powerful.
If Kathie is not ambitious and Ryan is innocent, then Gloria is not weak and Thomas is good.
If there is at least one people who is both ambitious and powerful, then Hall is weak.
Someone who is eithor not ambitious or not good is always not weak.
It can be concluded that Ryan is weak and Lionel is good once knowing that Ryan is not powerful.
If someone is not ambitious or he is not good, then he is purple.
If there is someone who is not ambitious, then Gloria is weak.
Someone who is not weak is always not purple.
If there is at least one people who is not weak, then Bowen is powerful and Thomas is good. | Gloria is not good. | contradiction |
Kathie is not weak.
Thomas is ambitious.
Lionel is not purple.
Lionel is good.
Gloria is ambitious.
Hall is purple.
Gloria is purple.
Bowen is purple.
Ryan is not powerful.
Bowen is ambitious.
Lionel is not innocent.
Thomas is not good.As long as someone is not purple and not weak, he is not ambitious and not innocent.
Someone being powerful is equivalent to being not innocent.
If there is at least one people who is good or innocent, then Ryan is not powerful.
If there is someone who is not innocent, then Gloria is good and Thomas is powerful.
If Kathie is not ambitious and Ryan is innocent, then Gloria is not weak and Thomas is good.
If there is at least one people who is both ambitious and powerful, then Hall is weak.
Someone who is eithor not ambitious or not good is always not weak.
It can be concluded that Ryan is weak and Lionel is good once knowing that Ryan is not powerful.
If someone is not ambitious or he is not good, then he is purple.
If there is someone who is not ambitious, then Gloria is weak.
Someone who is not weak is always not purple.
If there is at least one people who is not weak, then Bowen is powerful and Thomas is good. | Bowen is not good. | neutral |
Kathie is not weak.
Thomas is ambitious.
Lionel is not purple.
Lionel is good.
Gloria is ambitious.
Hall is purple.
Gloria is purple.
Bowen is purple.
Ryan is not powerful.
Bowen is ambitious.
Lionel is not innocent.
Thomas is not good.As long as someone is not purple and not weak, he is not ambitious and not innocent.
Someone being powerful is equivalent to being not innocent.
If there is at least one people who is good or innocent, then Ryan is not powerful.
If there is someone who is not innocent, then Gloria is good and Thomas is powerful.
If Kathie is not ambitious and Ryan is innocent, then Gloria is not weak and Thomas is good.
If there is at least one people who is both ambitious and powerful, then Hall is weak.
Someone who is eithor not ambitious or not good is always not weak.
It can be concluded that Ryan is weak and Lionel is good once knowing that Ryan is not powerful.
If someone is not ambitious or he is not good, then he is purple.
If there is someone who is not ambitious, then Gloria is weak.
Someone who is not weak is always not purple.
If there is at least one people who is not weak, then Bowen is powerful and Thomas is good. | Ryan is not innocent. | neutral |
Kathie is not weak.
Thomas is ambitious.
Lionel is not purple.
Lionel is good.
Gloria is ambitious.
Hall is purple.
Gloria is purple.
Bowen is purple.
Ryan is not powerful.
Bowen is ambitious.
Lionel is not innocent.
Thomas is not good.As long as someone is not purple and not weak, he is not ambitious and not innocent.
Someone being powerful is equivalent to being not innocent.
If there is at least one people who is good or innocent, then Ryan is not powerful.
If there is someone who is not innocent, then Gloria is good and Thomas is powerful.
If Kathie is not ambitious and Ryan is innocent, then Gloria is not weak and Thomas is good.
If there is at least one people who is both ambitious and powerful, then Hall is weak.
Someone who is eithor not ambitious or not good is always not weak.
It can be concluded that Ryan is weak and Lionel is good once knowing that Ryan is not powerful.
If someone is not ambitious or he is not good, then he is purple.
If there is someone who is not ambitious, then Gloria is weak.
Someone who is not weak is always not purple.
If there is at least one people who is not weak, then Bowen is powerful and Thomas is good. | Ryan is not ambitious. | neutral |
Kathie is not weak.
Thomas is ambitious.
Lionel is not purple.
Lionel is good.
Gloria is ambitious.
Hall is purple.
Gloria is purple.
Bowen is purple.
Ryan is not powerful.
Bowen is ambitious.
Lionel is not innocent.
Thomas is not good.As long as someone is not purple and not weak, he is not ambitious and not innocent.
Someone being powerful is equivalent to being not innocent.
If there is at least one people who is good or innocent, then Ryan is not powerful.
If there is someone who is not innocent, then Gloria is good and Thomas is powerful.
If Kathie is not ambitious and Ryan is innocent, then Gloria is not weak and Thomas is good.
If there is at least one people who is both ambitious and powerful, then Hall is weak.
Someone who is eithor not ambitious or not good is always not weak.
It can be concluded that Ryan is weak and Lionel is good once knowing that Ryan is not powerful.
If someone is not ambitious or he is not good, then he is purple.
If there is someone who is not ambitious, then Gloria is weak.
Someone who is not weak is always not purple.
If there is at least one people who is not weak, then Bowen is powerful and Thomas is good. | Hall is not innocent. | neutral |
Benton is not shy.
Kayla is not shy.
Kayla is not bright.
Benton is not sad.
Olaf is shy.
Olaf is massive.
Shawn is not chestnut.
Olaf is not chestnut.
Kendall is not sad.
Kendall is not bright.
Avery is chestnut.
Kayla is chestnut.It can be concluded that Kayla is dangerous once knowing that Avery is bright or Avery is massive.
Someone being not chestnut is equivalent to being not sad.
If someone is not massive and bright, then he is both chestnut and shy, and vice versa.
If someone who is not shy is also not dangerous, then he is sad.
If there is at least one people who is shy, then Shawn is not chestnut.
If Gemma is not bright, then Kayla is chestnut.
If someone is not shy and not sad, then he is massive, and vice versa.
Someone who is bright is always not chestnut.
It can be concluded that Gemma is not shy once knowing that Shawn is not bright and Shawn is dangerous.
If someone is not chestnut or he is sad, then he is not dangerous.
Avery is not massive if and only if Shawn is bright.
If someone is not shy or not massive, then he is not dangerous. | Kendall is not bright. | entailment |
Benton is not shy.
Kayla is not shy.
Kayla is not bright.
Benton is not sad.
Olaf is shy.
Olaf is massive.
Shawn is not chestnut.
Olaf is not chestnut.
Kendall is not sad.
Kendall is not bright.
Avery is chestnut.
Kayla is chestnut.It can be concluded that Kayla is dangerous once knowing that Avery is bright or Avery is massive.
Someone being not chestnut is equivalent to being not sad.
If someone is not massive and bright, then he is both chestnut and shy, and vice versa.
If someone who is not shy is also not dangerous, then he is sad.
If there is at least one people who is shy, then Shawn is not chestnut.
If Gemma is not bright, then Kayla is chestnut.
If someone is not shy and not sad, then he is massive, and vice versa.
Someone who is bright is always not chestnut.
It can be concluded that Gemma is not shy once knowing that Shawn is not bright and Shawn is dangerous.
If someone is not chestnut or he is sad, then he is not dangerous.
Avery is not massive if and only if Shawn is bright.
If someone is not shy or not massive, then he is not dangerous. | Gemma is not massive. | neutral |
Benton is not shy.
Kayla is not shy.
Kayla is not bright.
Benton is not sad.
Olaf is shy.
Olaf is massive.
Shawn is not chestnut.
Olaf is not chestnut.
Kendall is not sad.
Kendall is not bright.
Avery is chestnut.
Kayla is chestnut.It can be concluded that Kayla is dangerous once knowing that Avery is bright or Avery is massive.
Someone being not chestnut is equivalent to being not sad.
If someone is not massive and bright, then he is both chestnut and shy, and vice versa.
If someone who is not shy is also not dangerous, then he is sad.
If there is at least one people who is shy, then Shawn is not chestnut.
If Gemma is not bright, then Kayla is chestnut.
If someone is not shy and not sad, then he is massive, and vice versa.
Someone who is bright is always not chestnut.
It can be concluded that Gemma is not shy once knowing that Shawn is not bright and Shawn is dangerous.
If someone is not chestnut or he is sad, then he is not dangerous.
Avery is not massive if and only if Shawn is bright.
If someone is not shy or not massive, then he is not dangerous. | Kayla is not dangerous. | entailment |
Benton is not shy.
Kayla is not shy.
Kayla is not bright.
Benton is not sad.
Olaf is shy.
Olaf is massive.
Shawn is not chestnut.
Olaf is not chestnut.
Kendall is not sad.
Kendall is not bright.
Avery is chestnut.
Kayla is chestnut.It can be concluded that Kayla is dangerous once knowing that Avery is bright or Avery is massive.
Someone being not chestnut is equivalent to being not sad.
If someone is not massive and bright, then he is both chestnut and shy, and vice versa.
If someone who is not shy is also not dangerous, then he is sad.
If there is at least one people who is shy, then Shawn is not chestnut.
If Gemma is not bright, then Kayla is chestnut.
If someone is not shy and not sad, then he is massive, and vice versa.
Someone who is bright is always not chestnut.
It can be concluded that Gemma is not shy once knowing that Shawn is not bright and Shawn is dangerous.
If someone is not chestnut or he is sad, then he is not dangerous.
Avery is not massive if and only if Shawn is bright.
If someone is not shy or not massive, then he is not dangerous. | Kayla is chestnut. | entailment |
Benton is not shy.
Kayla is not shy.
Kayla is not bright.
Benton is not sad.
Olaf is shy.
Olaf is massive.
Shawn is not chestnut.
Olaf is not chestnut.
Kendall is not sad.
Kendall is not bright.
Avery is chestnut.
Kayla is chestnut.It can be concluded that Kayla is dangerous once knowing that Avery is bright or Avery is massive.
Someone being not chestnut is equivalent to being not sad.
If someone is not massive and bright, then he is both chestnut and shy, and vice versa.
If someone who is not shy is also not dangerous, then he is sad.
If there is at least one people who is shy, then Shawn is not chestnut.
If Gemma is not bright, then Kayla is chestnut.
If someone is not shy and not sad, then he is massive, and vice versa.
Someone who is bright is always not chestnut.
It can be concluded that Gemma is not shy once knowing that Shawn is not bright and Shawn is dangerous.
If someone is not chestnut or he is sad, then he is not dangerous.
Avery is not massive if and only if Shawn is bright.
If someone is not shy or not massive, then he is not dangerous. | Shawn is not massive. | neutral |
Benton is not shy.
Kayla is not shy.
Kayla is not bright.
Benton is not sad.
Olaf is shy.
Olaf is massive.
Shawn is not chestnut.
Olaf is not chestnut.
Kendall is not sad.
Kendall is not bright.
Avery is chestnut.
Kayla is chestnut.It can be concluded that Kayla is dangerous once knowing that Avery is bright or Avery is massive.
Someone being not chestnut is equivalent to being not sad.
If someone is not massive and bright, then he is both chestnut and shy, and vice versa.
If someone who is not shy is also not dangerous, then he is sad.
If there is at least one people who is shy, then Shawn is not chestnut.
If Gemma is not bright, then Kayla is chestnut.
If someone is not shy and not sad, then he is massive, and vice versa.
Someone who is bright is always not chestnut.
It can be concluded that Gemma is not shy once knowing that Shawn is not bright and Shawn is dangerous.
If someone is not chestnut or he is sad, then he is not dangerous.
Avery is not massive if and only if Shawn is bright.
If someone is not shy or not massive, then he is not dangerous. | Shawn is chestnut. | contradiction |
Benton is not shy.
Kayla is not shy.
Kayla is not bright.
Benton is not sad.
Olaf is shy.
Olaf is massive.
Shawn is not chestnut.
Olaf is not chestnut.
Kendall is not sad.
Kendall is not bright.
Avery is chestnut.
Kayla is chestnut.It can be concluded that Kayla is dangerous once knowing that Avery is bright or Avery is massive.
Someone being not chestnut is equivalent to being not sad.
If someone is not massive and bright, then he is both chestnut and shy, and vice versa.
If someone who is not shy is also not dangerous, then he is sad.
If there is at least one people who is shy, then Shawn is not chestnut.
If Gemma is not bright, then Kayla is chestnut.
If someone is not shy and not sad, then he is massive, and vice versa.
Someone who is bright is always not chestnut.
It can be concluded that Gemma is not shy once knowing that Shawn is not bright and Shawn is dangerous.
If someone is not chestnut or he is sad, then he is not dangerous.
Avery is not massive if and only if Shawn is bright.
If someone is not shy or not massive, then he is not dangerous. | Benton is not sad. | self_contradiction |
Benton is not shy.
Kayla is not shy.
Kayla is not bright.
Benton is not sad.
Olaf is shy.
Olaf is massive.
Shawn is not chestnut.
Olaf is not chestnut.
Kendall is not sad.
Kendall is not bright.
Avery is chestnut.
Kayla is chestnut.It can be concluded that Kayla is dangerous once knowing that Avery is bright or Avery is massive.
Someone being not chestnut is equivalent to being not sad.
If someone is not massive and bright, then he is both chestnut and shy, and vice versa.
If someone who is not shy is also not dangerous, then he is sad.
If there is at least one people who is shy, then Shawn is not chestnut.
If Gemma is not bright, then Kayla is chestnut.
If someone is not shy and not sad, then he is massive, and vice versa.
Someone who is bright is always not chestnut.
It can be concluded that Gemma is not shy once knowing that Shawn is not bright and Shawn is dangerous.
If someone is not chestnut or he is sad, then he is not dangerous.
Avery is not massive if and only if Shawn is bright.
If someone is not shy or not massive, then he is not dangerous. | Shawn is not chestnut. | entailment |
Benton is not shy.
Kayla is not shy.
Kayla is not bright.
Benton is not sad.
Olaf is shy.
Olaf is massive.
Shawn is not chestnut.
Olaf is not chestnut.
Kendall is not sad.
Kendall is not bright.
Avery is chestnut.
Kayla is chestnut.It can be concluded that Kayla is dangerous once knowing that Avery is bright or Avery is massive.
Someone being not chestnut is equivalent to being not sad.
If someone is not massive and bright, then he is both chestnut and shy, and vice versa.
If someone who is not shy is also not dangerous, then he is sad.
If there is at least one people who is shy, then Shawn is not chestnut.
If Gemma is not bright, then Kayla is chestnut.
If someone is not shy and not sad, then he is massive, and vice versa.
Someone who is bright is always not chestnut.
It can be concluded that Gemma is not shy once knowing that Shawn is not bright and Shawn is dangerous.
If someone is not chestnut or he is sad, then he is not dangerous.
Avery is not massive if and only if Shawn is bright.
If someone is not shy or not massive, then he is not dangerous. | Olaf is not massive. | contradiction |
Benton is not shy.
Kayla is not shy.
Kayla is not bright.
Benton is not sad.
Olaf is shy.
Olaf is massive.
Shawn is not chestnut.
Olaf is not chestnut.
Kendall is not sad.
Kendall is not bright.
Avery is chestnut.
Kayla is chestnut.It can be concluded that Kayla is dangerous once knowing that Avery is bright or Avery is massive.
Someone being not chestnut is equivalent to being not sad.
If someone is not massive and bright, then he is both chestnut and shy, and vice versa.
If someone who is not shy is also not dangerous, then he is sad.
If there is at least one people who is shy, then Shawn is not chestnut.
If Gemma is not bright, then Kayla is chestnut.
If someone is not shy and not sad, then he is massive, and vice versa.
Someone who is bright is always not chestnut.
It can be concluded that Gemma is not shy once knowing that Shawn is not bright and Shawn is dangerous.
If someone is not chestnut or he is sad, then he is not dangerous.
Avery is not massive if and only if Shawn is bright.
If someone is not shy or not massive, then he is not dangerous. | Benton is massive. | entailment |
Benton is not shy.
Kayla is not shy.
Kayla is not bright.
Benton is not sad.
Olaf is shy.
Olaf is massive.
Shawn is not chestnut.
Olaf is not chestnut.
Kendall is not sad.
Kendall is not bright.
Avery is chestnut.
Kayla is chestnut.It can be concluded that Kayla is dangerous once knowing that Avery is bright or Avery is massive.
Someone being not chestnut is equivalent to being not sad.
If someone is not massive and bright, then he is both chestnut and shy, and vice versa.
If someone who is not shy is also not dangerous, then he is sad.
If there is at least one people who is shy, then Shawn is not chestnut.
If Gemma is not bright, then Kayla is chestnut.
If someone is not shy and not sad, then he is massive, and vice versa.
Someone who is bright is always not chestnut.
It can be concluded that Gemma is not shy once knowing that Shawn is not bright and Shawn is dangerous.
If someone is not chestnut or he is sad, then he is not dangerous.
Avery is not massive if and only if Shawn is bright.
If someone is not shy or not massive, then he is not dangerous. | Olaf is shy. | self_contradiction |
Benton is not shy.
Kayla is not shy.
Kayla is not bright.
Benton is not sad.
Olaf is shy.
Olaf is massive.
Shawn is not chestnut.
Olaf is not chestnut.
Kendall is not sad.
Kendall is not bright.
Avery is chestnut.
Kayla is chestnut.It can be concluded that Kayla is dangerous once knowing that Avery is bright or Avery is massive.
Someone being not chestnut is equivalent to being not sad.
If someone is not massive and bright, then he is both chestnut and shy, and vice versa.
If someone who is not shy is also not dangerous, then he is sad.
If there is at least one people who is shy, then Shawn is not chestnut.
If Gemma is not bright, then Kayla is chestnut.
If someone is not shy and not sad, then he is massive, and vice versa.
Someone who is bright is always not chestnut.
It can be concluded that Gemma is not shy once knowing that Shawn is not bright and Shawn is dangerous.
If someone is not chestnut or he is sad, then he is not dangerous.
Avery is not massive if and only if Shawn is bright.
If someone is not shy or not massive, then he is not dangerous. | Avery is sad. | neutral |
Benton is not shy.
Kayla is not shy.
Kayla is not bright.
Benton is not sad.
Olaf is shy.
Olaf is massive.
Shawn is not chestnut.
Olaf is not chestnut.
Kendall is not sad.
Kendall is not bright.
Avery is chestnut.
Kayla is chestnut.It can be concluded that Kayla is dangerous once knowing that Avery is bright or Avery is massive.
Someone being not chestnut is equivalent to being not sad.
If someone is not massive and bright, then he is both chestnut and shy, and vice versa.
If someone who is not shy is also not dangerous, then he is sad.
If there is at least one people who is shy, then Shawn is not chestnut.
If Gemma is not bright, then Kayla is chestnut.
If someone is not shy and not sad, then he is massive, and vice versa.
Someone who is bright is always not chestnut.
It can be concluded that Gemma is not shy once knowing that Shawn is not bright and Shawn is dangerous.
If someone is not chestnut or he is sad, then he is not dangerous.
Avery is not massive if and only if Shawn is bright.
If someone is not shy or not massive, then he is not dangerous. | Avery is not massive. | neutral |
Benton is not shy.
Kayla is not shy.
Kayla is not bright.
Benton is not sad.
Olaf is shy.
Olaf is massive.
Shawn is not chestnut.
Olaf is not chestnut.
Kendall is not sad.
Kendall is not bright.
Avery is chestnut.
Kayla is chestnut.It can be concluded that Kayla is dangerous once knowing that Avery is bright or Avery is massive.
Someone being not chestnut is equivalent to being not sad.
If someone is not massive and bright, then he is both chestnut and shy, and vice versa.
If someone who is not shy is also not dangerous, then he is sad.
If there is at least one people who is shy, then Shawn is not chestnut.
If Gemma is not bright, then Kayla is chestnut.
If someone is not shy and not sad, then he is massive, and vice versa.
Someone who is bright is always not chestnut.
It can be concluded that Gemma is not shy once knowing that Shawn is not bright and Shawn is dangerous.
If someone is not chestnut or he is sad, then he is not dangerous.
Avery is not massive if and only if Shawn is bright.
If someone is not shy or not massive, then he is not dangerous. | Olaf is dangerous. | contradiction |
Benton is not shy.
Kayla is not shy.
Kayla is not bright.
Benton is not sad.
Olaf is shy.
Olaf is massive.
Shawn is not chestnut.
Olaf is not chestnut.
Kendall is not sad.
Kendall is not bright.
Avery is chestnut.
Kayla is chestnut.It can be concluded that Kayla is dangerous once knowing that Avery is bright or Avery is massive.
Someone being not chestnut is equivalent to being not sad.
If someone is not massive and bright, then he is both chestnut and shy, and vice versa.
If someone who is not shy is also not dangerous, then he is sad.
If there is at least one people who is shy, then Shawn is not chestnut.
If Gemma is not bright, then Kayla is chestnut.
If someone is not shy and not sad, then he is massive, and vice versa.
Someone who is bright is always not chestnut.
It can be concluded that Gemma is not shy once knowing that Shawn is not bright and Shawn is dangerous.
If someone is not chestnut or he is sad, then he is not dangerous.
Avery is not massive if and only if Shawn is bright.
If someone is not shy or not massive, then he is not dangerous. | Olaf is sad. | self_contradiction |
Benton is not shy.
Kayla is not shy.
Kayla is not bright.
Benton is not sad.
Olaf is shy.
Olaf is massive.
Shawn is not chestnut.
Olaf is not chestnut.
Kendall is not sad.
Kendall is not bright.
Avery is chestnut.
Kayla is chestnut.It can be concluded that Kayla is dangerous once knowing that Avery is bright or Avery is massive.
Someone being not chestnut is equivalent to being not sad.
If someone is not massive and bright, then he is both chestnut and shy, and vice versa.
If someone who is not shy is also not dangerous, then he is sad.
If there is at least one people who is shy, then Shawn is not chestnut.
If Gemma is not bright, then Kayla is chestnut.
If someone is not shy and not sad, then he is massive, and vice versa.
Someone who is bright is always not chestnut.
It can be concluded that Gemma is not shy once knowing that Shawn is not bright and Shawn is dangerous.
If someone is not chestnut or he is sad, then he is not dangerous.
Avery is not massive if and only if Shawn is bright.
If someone is not shy or not massive, then he is not dangerous. | Olaf is not sad. | self_contradiction |
Benton is not shy.
Kayla is not shy.
Kayla is not bright.
Benton is not sad.
Olaf is shy.
Olaf is massive.
Shawn is not chestnut.
Olaf is not chestnut.
Kendall is not sad.
Kendall is not bright.
Avery is chestnut.
Kayla is chestnut.It can be concluded that Kayla is dangerous once knowing that Avery is bright or Avery is massive.
Someone being not chestnut is equivalent to being not sad.
If someone is not massive and bright, then he is both chestnut and shy, and vice versa.
If someone who is not shy is also not dangerous, then he is sad.
If there is at least one people who is shy, then Shawn is not chestnut.
If Gemma is not bright, then Kayla is chestnut.
If someone is not shy and not sad, then he is massive, and vice versa.
Someone who is bright is always not chestnut.
It can be concluded that Gemma is not shy once knowing that Shawn is not bright and Shawn is dangerous.
If someone is not chestnut or he is sad, then he is not dangerous.
Avery is not massive if and only if Shawn is bright.
If someone is not shy or not massive, then he is not dangerous. | Kendall is bright. | contradiction |
Benton is not shy.
Kayla is not shy.
Kayla is not bright.
Benton is not sad.
Olaf is shy.
Olaf is massive.
Shawn is not chestnut.
Olaf is not chestnut.
Kendall is not sad.
Kendall is not bright.
Avery is chestnut.
Kayla is chestnut.It can be concluded that Kayla is dangerous once knowing that Avery is bright or Avery is massive.
Someone being not chestnut is equivalent to being not sad.
If someone is not massive and bright, then he is both chestnut and shy, and vice versa.
If someone who is not shy is also not dangerous, then he is sad.
If there is at least one people who is shy, then Shawn is not chestnut.
If Gemma is not bright, then Kayla is chestnut.
If someone is not shy and not sad, then he is massive, and vice versa.
Someone who is bright is always not chestnut.
It can be concluded that Gemma is not shy once knowing that Shawn is not bright and Shawn is dangerous.
If someone is not chestnut or he is sad, then he is not dangerous.
Avery is not massive if and only if Shawn is bright.
If someone is not shy or not massive, then he is not dangerous. | Benton is sad. | self_contradiction |
Benton is not shy.
Kayla is not shy.
Kayla is not bright.
Benton is not sad.
Olaf is shy.
Olaf is massive.
Shawn is not chestnut.
Olaf is not chestnut.
Kendall is not sad.
Kendall is not bright.
Avery is chestnut.
Kayla is chestnut.It can be concluded that Kayla is dangerous once knowing that Avery is bright or Avery is massive.
Someone being not chestnut is equivalent to being not sad.
If someone is not massive and bright, then he is both chestnut and shy, and vice versa.
If someone who is not shy is also not dangerous, then he is sad.
If there is at least one people who is shy, then Shawn is not chestnut.
If Gemma is not bright, then Kayla is chestnut.
If someone is not shy and not sad, then he is massive, and vice versa.
Someone who is bright is always not chestnut.
It can be concluded that Gemma is not shy once knowing that Shawn is not bright and Shawn is dangerous.
If someone is not chestnut or he is sad, then he is not dangerous.
Avery is not massive if and only if Shawn is bright.
If someone is not shy or not massive, then he is not dangerous. | Kendall is dangerous. | contradiction |
Benton is not shy.
Kayla is not shy.
Kayla is not bright.
Benton is not sad.
Olaf is shy.
Olaf is massive.
Shawn is not chestnut.
Olaf is not chestnut.
Kendall is not sad.
Kendall is not bright.
Avery is chestnut.
Kayla is chestnut.It can be concluded that Kayla is dangerous once knowing that Avery is bright or Avery is massive.
Someone being not chestnut is equivalent to being not sad.
If someone is not massive and bright, then he is both chestnut and shy, and vice versa.
If someone who is not shy is also not dangerous, then he is sad.
If there is at least one people who is shy, then Shawn is not chestnut.
If Gemma is not bright, then Kayla is chestnut.
If someone is not shy and not sad, then he is massive, and vice versa.
Someone who is bright is always not chestnut.
It can be concluded that Gemma is not shy once knowing that Shawn is not bright and Shawn is dangerous.
If someone is not chestnut or he is sad, then he is not dangerous.
Avery is not massive if and only if Shawn is bright.
If someone is not shy or not massive, then he is not dangerous. | Benton is bright. | neutral |
Clark is stormy.
Garrick is agreeable.
Conroy is not agreeable.
Clark is disturbed.
Addison is wrong.
Clark is agreeable.
Conroy is not wrong.
Martin is disturbed.
Martin is not tall.
Conroy is not disturbed.
Conroy is aggressive.
Garrick is tall.Someone being wrong is equivalent to being disturbed.
Someone who is tall is always not aggressive.
If Conroy is not disturbed and Hubert is tall, then Addison is agreeable.
Someone who is eithor not agreeable or not wrong is always stormy.
It can be concluded that Addison is aggressive once knowing that Hubert is not stormy and Hubert is not tall.
Someone being both stormy and tall is equivalent to being not agreeable.
Someone being both not stormy and disturbed is equivalent to being aggressive and tall.
Someone is not aggressive and disturbed if and only if he is tall.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Conroy is not agreeable and Garrick is not stormy.
If there is at least one people who is stormy, then Martin is not tall and Conroy is agreeable.
Garrick being not aggressive or Hubert being agreeable implies that Addison is wrong.
Conroy is not stormy if and only if Martin is aggressive and Conroy is not tall. | Garrick is not aggressive. | self_contradiction |
Clark is stormy.
Garrick is agreeable.
Conroy is not agreeable.
Clark is disturbed.
Addison is wrong.
Clark is agreeable.
Conroy is not wrong.
Martin is disturbed.
Martin is not tall.
Conroy is not disturbed.
Conroy is aggressive.
Garrick is tall.Someone being wrong is equivalent to being disturbed.
Someone who is tall is always not aggressive.
If Conroy is not disturbed and Hubert is tall, then Addison is agreeable.
Someone who is eithor not agreeable or not wrong is always stormy.
It can be concluded that Addison is aggressive once knowing that Hubert is not stormy and Hubert is not tall.
Someone being both stormy and tall is equivalent to being not agreeable.
Someone being both not stormy and disturbed is equivalent to being aggressive and tall.
Someone is not aggressive and disturbed if and only if he is tall.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Conroy is not agreeable and Garrick is not stormy.
If there is at least one people who is stormy, then Martin is not tall and Conroy is agreeable.
Garrick being not aggressive or Hubert being agreeable implies that Addison is wrong.
Conroy is not stormy if and only if Martin is aggressive and Conroy is not tall. | Hubert is tall. | neutral |
Clark is stormy.
Garrick is agreeable.
Conroy is not agreeable.
Clark is disturbed.
Addison is wrong.
Clark is agreeable.
Conroy is not wrong.
Martin is disturbed.
Martin is not tall.
Conroy is not disturbed.
Conroy is aggressive.
Garrick is tall.Someone being wrong is equivalent to being disturbed.
Someone who is tall is always not aggressive.
If Conroy is not disturbed and Hubert is tall, then Addison is agreeable.
Someone who is eithor not agreeable or not wrong is always stormy.
It can be concluded that Addison is aggressive once knowing that Hubert is not stormy and Hubert is not tall.
Someone being both stormy and tall is equivalent to being not agreeable.
Someone being both not stormy and disturbed is equivalent to being aggressive and tall.
Someone is not aggressive and disturbed if and only if he is tall.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Conroy is not agreeable and Garrick is not stormy.
If there is at least one people who is stormy, then Martin is not tall and Conroy is agreeable.
Garrick being not aggressive or Hubert being agreeable implies that Addison is wrong.
Conroy is not stormy if and only if Martin is aggressive and Conroy is not tall. | Martin is disturbed. | entailment |
Clark is stormy.
Garrick is agreeable.
Conroy is not agreeable.
Clark is disturbed.
Addison is wrong.
Clark is agreeable.
Conroy is not wrong.
Martin is disturbed.
Martin is not tall.
Conroy is not disturbed.
Conroy is aggressive.
Garrick is tall.Someone being wrong is equivalent to being disturbed.
Someone who is tall is always not aggressive.
If Conroy is not disturbed and Hubert is tall, then Addison is agreeable.
Someone who is eithor not agreeable or not wrong is always stormy.
It can be concluded that Addison is aggressive once knowing that Hubert is not stormy and Hubert is not tall.
Someone being both stormy and tall is equivalent to being not agreeable.
Someone being both not stormy and disturbed is equivalent to being aggressive and tall.
Someone is not aggressive and disturbed if and only if he is tall.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Conroy is not agreeable and Garrick is not stormy.
If there is at least one people who is stormy, then Martin is not tall and Conroy is agreeable.
Garrick being not aggressive or Hubert being agreeable implies that Addison is wrong.
Conroy is not stormy if and only if Martin is aggressive and Conroy is not tall. | Clark is not agreeable. | contradiction |
Clark is stormy.
Garrick is agreeable.
Conroy is not agreeable.
Clark is disturbed.
Addison is wrong.
Clark is agreeable.
Conroy is not wrong.
Martin is disturbed.
Martin is not tall.
Conroy is not disturbed.
Conroy is aggressive.
Garrick is tall.Someone being wrong is equivalent to being disturbed.
Someone who is tall is always not aggressive.
If Conroy is not disturbed and Hubert is tall, then Addison is agreeable.
Someone who is eithor not agreeable or not wrong is always stormy.
It can be concluded that Addison is aggressive once knowing that Hubert is not stormy and Hubert is not tall.
Someone being both stormy and tall is equivalent to being not agreeable.
Someone being both not stormy and disturbed is equivalent to being aggressive and tall.
Someone is not aggressive and disturbed if and only if he is tall.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Conroy is not agreeable and Garrick is not stormy.
If there is at least one people who is stormy, then Martin is not tall and Conroy is agreeable.
Garrick being not aggressive or Hubert being agreeable implies that Addison is wrong.
Conroy is not stormy if and only if Martin is aggressive and Conroy is not tall. | Igor is not wrong. | neutral |
Clark is stormy.
Garrick is agreeable.
Conroy is not agreeable.
Clark is disturbed.
Addison is wrong.
Clark is agreeable.
Conroy is not wrong.
Martin is disturbed.
Martin is not tall.
Conroy is not disturbed.
Conroy is aggressive.
Garrick is tall.Someone being wrong is equivalent to being disturbed.
Someone who is tall is always not aggressive.
If Conroy is not disturbed and Hubert is tall, then Addison is agreeable.
Someone who is eithor not agreeable or not wrong is always stormy.
It can be concluded that Addison is aggressive once knowing that Hubert is not stormy and Hubert is not tall.
Someone being both stormy and tall is equivalent to being not agreeable.
Someone being both not stormy and disturbed is equivalent to being aggressive and tall.
Someone is not aggressive and disturbed if and only if he is tall.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Conroy is not agreeable and Garrick is not stormy.
If there is at least one people who is stormy, then Martin is not tall and Conroy is agreeable.
Garrick being not aggressive or Hubert being agreeable implies that Addison is wrong.
Conroy is not stormy if and only if Martin is aggressive and Conroy is not tall. | Garrick is stormy. | contradiction |
Clark is stormy.
Garrick is agreeable.
Conroy is not agreeable.
Clark is disturbed.
Addison is wrong.
Clark is agreeable.
Conroy is not wrong.
Martin is disturbed.
Martin is not tall.
Conroy is not disturbed.
Conroy is aggressive.
Garrick is tall.Someone being wrong is equivalent to being disturbed.
Someone who is tall is always not aggressive.
If Conroy is not disturbed and Hubert is tall, then Addison is agreeable.
Someone who is eithor not agreeable or not wrong is always stormy.
It can be concluded that Addison is aggressive once knowing that Hubert is not stormy and Hubert is not tall.
Someone being both stormy and tall is equivalent to being not agreeable.
Someone being both not stormy and disturbed is equivalent to being aggressive and tall.
Someone is not aggressive and disturbed if and only if he is tall.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Conroy is not agreeable and Garrick is not stormy.
If there is at least one people who is stormy, then Martin is not tall and Conroy is agreeable.
Garrick being not aggressive or Hubert being agreeable implies that Addison is wrong.
Conroy is not stormy if and only if Martin is aggressive and Conroy is not tall. | Conroy is not wrong. | self_contradiction |
Clark is stormy.
Garrick is agreeable.
Conroy is not agreeable.
Clark is disturbed.
Addison is wrong.
Clark is agreeable.
Conroy is not wrong.
Martin is disturbed.
Martin is not tall.
Conroy is not disturbed.
Conroy is aggressive.
Garrick is tall.Someone being wrong is equivalent to being disturbed.
Someone who is tall is always not aggressive.
If Conroy is not disturbed and Hubert is tall, then Addison is agreeable.
Someone who is eithor not agreeable or not wrong is always stormy.
It can be concluded that Addison is aggressive once knowing that Hubert is not stormy and Hubert is not tall.
Someone being both stormy and tall is equivalent to being not agreeable.
Someone being both not stormy and disturbed is equivalent to being aggressive and tall.
Someone is not aggressive and disturbed if and only if he is tall.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Conroy is not agreeable and Garrick is not stormy.
If there is at least one people who is stormy, then Martin is not tall and Conroy is agreeable.
Garrick being not aggressive or Hubert being agreeable implies that Addison is wrong.
Conroy is not stormy if and only if Martin is aggressive and Conroy is not tall. | Igor is not agreeable. | neutral |
Clark is stormy.
Garrick is agreeable.
Conroy is not agreeable.
Clark is disturbed.
Addison is wrong.
Clark is agreeable.
Conroy is not wrong.
Martin is disturbed.
Martin is not tall.
Conroy is not disturbed.
Conroy is aggressive.
Garrick is tall.Someone being wrong is equivalent to being disturbed.
Someone who is tall is always not aggressive.
If Conroy is not disturbed and Hubert is tall, then Addison is agreeable.
Someone who is eithor not agreeable or not wrong is always stormy.
It can be concluded that Addison is aggressive once knowing that Hubert is not stormy and Hubert is not tall.
Someone being both stormy and tall is equivalent to being not agreeable.
Someone being both not stormy and disturbed is equivalent to being aggressive and tall.
Someone is not aggressive and disturbed if and only if he is tall.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Conroy is not agreeable and Garrick is not stormy.
If there is at least one people who is stormy, then Martin is not tall and Conroy is agreeable.
Garrick being not aggressive or Hubert being agreeable implies that Addison is wrong.
Conroy is not stormy if and only if Martin is aggressive and Conroy is not tall. | Conroy is disturbed. | self_contradiction |
Clark is stormy.
Garrick is agreeable.
Conroy is not agreeable.
Clark is disturbed.
Addison is wrong.
Clark is agreeable.
Conroy is not wrong.
Martin is disturbed.
Martin is not tall.
Conroy is not disturbed.
Conroy is aggressive.
Garrick is tall.Someone being wrong is equivalent to being disturbed.
Someone who is tall is always not aggressive.
If Conroy is not disturbed and Hubert is tall, then Addison is agreeable.
Someone who is eithor not agreeable or not wrong is always stormy.
It can be concluded that Addison is aggressive once knowing that Hubert is not stormy and Hubert is not tall.
Someone being both stormy and tall is equivalent to being not agreeable.
Someone being both not stormy and disturbed is equivalent to being aggressive and tall.
Someone is not aggressive and disturbed if and only if he is tall.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Conroy is not agreeable and Garrick is not stormy.
If there is at least one people who is stormy, then Martin is not tall and Conroy is agreeable.
Garrick being not aggressive or Hubert being agreeable implies that Addison is wrong.
Conroy is not stormy if and only if Martin is aggressive and Conroy is not tall. | Clark is tall. | neutral |
Clark is stormy.
Garrick is agreeable.
Conroy is not agreeable.
Clark is disturbed.
Addison is wrong.
Clark is agreeable.
Conroy is not wrong.
Martin is disturbed.
Martin is not tall.
Conroy is not disturbed.
Conroy is aggressive.
Garrick is tall.Someone being wrong is equivalent to being disturbed.
Someone who is tall is always not aggressive.
If Conroy is not disturbed and Hubert is tall, then Addison is agreeable.
Someone who is eithor not agreeable or not wrong is always stormy.
It can be concluded that Addison is aggressive once knowing that Hubert is not stormy and Hubert is not tall.
Someone being both stormy and tall is equivalent to being not agreeable.
Someone being both not stormy and disturbed is equivalent to being aggressive and tall.
Someone is not aggressive and disturbed if and only if he is tall.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Conroy is not agreeable and Garrick is not stormy.
If there is at least one people who is stormy, then Martin is not tall and Conroy is agreeable.
Garrick being not aggressive or Hubert being agreeable implies that Addison is wrong.
Conroy is not stormy if and only if Martin is aggressive and Conroy is not tall. | Clark is wrong. | entailment |
Clark is stormy.
Garrick is agreeable.
Conroy is not agreeable.
Clark is disturbed.
Addison is wrong.
Clark is agreeable.
Conroy is not wrong.
Martin is disturbed.
Martin is not tall.
Conroy is not disturbed.
Conroy is aggressive.
Garrick is tall.Someone being wrong is equivalent to being disturbed.
Someone who is tall is always not aggressive.
If Conroy is not disturbed and Hubert is tall, then Addison is agreeable.
Someone who is eithor not agreeable or not wrong is always stormy.
It can be concluded that Addison is aggressive once knowing that Hubert is not stormy and Hubert is not tall.
Someone being both stormy and tall is equivalent to being not agreeable.
Someone being both not stormy and disturbed is equivalent to being aggressive and tall.
Someone is not aggressive and disturbed if and only if he is tall.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Conroy is not agreeable and Garrick is not stormy.
If there is at least one people who is stormy, then Martin is not tall and Conroy is agreeable.
Garrick being not aggressive or Hubert being agreeable implies that Addison is wrong.
Conroy is not stormy if and only if Martin is aggressive and Conroy is not tall. | Garrick is not disturbed. | contradiction |
Clark is stormy.
Garrick is agreeable.
Conroy is not agreeable.
Clark is disturbed.
Addison is wrong.
Clark is agreeable.
Conroy is not wrong.
Martin is disturbed.
Martin is not tall.
Conroy is not disturbed.
Conroy is aggressive.
Garrick is tall.Someone being wrong is equivalent to being disturbed.
Someone who is tall is always not aggressive.
If Conroy is not disturbed and Hubert is tall, then Addison is agreeable.
Someone who is eithor not agreeable or not wrong is always stormy.
It can be concluded that Addison is aggressive once knowing that Hubert is not stormy and Hubert is not tall.
Someone being both stormy and tall is equivalent to being not agreeable.
Someone being both not stormy and disturbed is equivalent to being aggressive and tall.
Someone is not aggressive and disturbed if and only if he is tall.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Conroy is not agreeable and Garrick is not stormy.
If there is at least one people who is stormy, then Martin is not tall and Conroy is agreeable.
Garrick being not aggressive or Hubert being agreeable implies that Addison is wrong.
Conroy is not stormy if and only if Martin is aggressive and Conroy is not tall. | Clark is stormy. | entailment |
Clark is stormy.
Garrick is agreeable.
Conroy is not agreeable.
Clark is disturbed.
Addison is wrong.
Clark is agreeable.
Conroy is not wrong.
Martin is disturbed.
Martin is not tall.
Conroy is not disturbed.
Conroy is aggressive.
Garrick is tall.Someone being wrong is equivalent to being disturbed.
Someone who is tall is always not aggressive.
If Conroy is not disturbed and Hubert is tall, then Addison is agreeable.
Someone who is eithor not agreeable or not wrong is always stormy.
It can be concluded that Addison is aggressive once knowing that Hubert is not stormy and Hubert is not tall.
Someone being both stormy and tall is equivalent to being not agreeable.
Someone being both not stormy and disturbed is equivalent to being aggressive and tall.
Someone is not aggressive and disturbed if and only if he is tall.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Conroy is not agreeable and Garrick is not stormy.
If there is at least one people who is stormy, then Martin is not tall and Conroy is agreeable.
Garrick being not aggressive or Hubert being agreeable implies that Addison is wrong.
Conroy is not stormy if and only if Martin is aggressive and Conroy is not tall. | Martin is not aggressive. | contradiction |
Clark is stormy.
Garrick is agreeable.
Conroy is not agreeable.
Clark is disturbed.
Addison is wrong.
Clark is agreeable.
Conroy is not wrong.
Martin is disturbed.
Martin is not tall.
Conroy is not disturbed.
Conroy is aggressive.
Garrick is tall.Someone being wrong is equivalent to being disturbed.
Someone who is tall is always not aggressive.
If Conroy is not disturbed and Hubert is tall, then Addison is agreeable.
Someone who is eithor not agreeable or not wrong is always stormy.
It can be concluded that Addison is aggressive once knowing that Hubert is not stormy and Hubert is not tall.
Someone being both stormy and tall is equivalent to being not agreeable.
Someone being both not stormy and disturbed is equivalent to being aggressive and tall.
Someone is not aggressive and disturbed if and only if he is tall.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Conroy is not agreeable and Garrick is not stormy.
If there is at least one people who is stormy, then Martin is not tall and Conroy is agreeable.
Garrick being not aggressive or Hubert being agreeable implies that Addison is wrong.
Conroy is not stormy if and only if Martin is aggressive and Conroy is not tall. | Clark is agreeable. | entailment |
Clark is stormy.
Garrick is agreeable.
Conroy is not agreeable.
Clark is disturbed.
Addison is wrong.
Clark is agreeable.
Conroy is not wrong.
Martin is disturbed.
Martin is not tall.
Conroy is not disturbed.
Conroy is aggressive.
Garrick is tall.Someone being wrong is equivalent to being disturbed.
Someone who is tall is always not aggressive.
If Conroy is not disturbed and Hubert is tall, then Addison is agreeable.
Someone who is eithor not agreeable or not wrong is always stormy.
It can be concluded that Addison is aggressive once knowing that Hubert is not stormy and Hubert is not tall.
Someone being both stormy and tall is equivalent to being not agreeable.
Someone being both not stormy and disturbed is equivalent to being aggressive and tall.
Someone is not aggressive and disturbed if and only if he is tall.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Conroy is not agreeable and Garrick is not stormy.
If there is at least one people who is stormy, then Martin is not tall and Conroy is agreeable.
Garrick being not aggressive or Hubert being agreeable implies that Addison is wrong.
Conroy is not stormy if and only if Martin is aggressive and Conroy is not tall. | Conroy is not agreeable. | self_contradiction |
Clark is stormy.
Garrick is agreeable.
Conroy is not agreeable.
Clark is disturbed.
Addison is wrong.
Clark is agreeable.
Conroy is not wrong.
Martin is disturbed.
Martin is not tall.
Conroy is not disturbed.
Conroy is aggressive.
Garrick is tall.Someone being wrong is equivalent to being disturbed.
Someone who is tall is always not aggressive.
If Conroy is not disturbed and Hubert is tall, then Addison is agreeable.
Someone who is eithor not agreeable or not wrong is always stormy.
It can be concluded that Addison is aggressive once knowing that Hubert is not stormy and Hubert is not tall.
Someone being both stormy and tall is equivalent to being not agreeable.
Someone being both not stormy and disturbed is equivalent to being aggressive and tall.
Someone is not aggressive and disturbed if and only if he is tall.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Conroy is not agreeable and Garrick is not stormy.
If there is at least one people who is stormy, then Martin is not tall and Conroy is agreeable.
Garrick being not aggressive or Hubert being agreeable implies that Addison is wrong.
Conroy is not stormy if and only if Martin is aggressive and Conroy is not tall. | Garrick is wrong. | entailment |
Clark is stormy.
Garrick is agreeable.
Conroy is not agreeable.
Clark is disturbed.
Addison is wrong.
Clark is agreeable.
Conroy is not wrong.
Martin is disturbed.
Martin is not tall.
Conroy is not disturbed.
Conroy is aggressive.
Garrick is tall.Someone being wrong is equivalent to being disturbed.
Someone who is tall is always not aggressive.
If Conroy is not disturbed and Hubert is tall, then Addison is agreeable.
Someone who is eithor not agreeable or not wrong is always stormy.
It can be concluded that Addison is aggressive once knowing that Hubert is not stormy and Hubert is not tall.
Someone being both stormy and tall is equivalent to being not agreeable.
Someone being both not stormy and disturbed is equivalent to being aggressive and tall.
Someone is not aggressive and disturbed if and only if he is tall.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Conroy is not agreeable and Garrick is not stormy.
If there is at least one people who is stormy, then Martin is not tall and Conroy is agreeable.
Garrick being not aggressive or Hubert being agreeable implies that Addison is wrong.
Conroy is not stormy if and only if Martin is aggressive and Conroy is not tall. | Martin is tall. | contradiction |
Clark is stormy.
Garrick is agreeable.
Conroy is not agreeable.
Clark is disturbed.
Addison is wrong.
Clark is agreeable.
Conroy is not wrong.
Martin is disturbed.
Martin is not tall.
Conroy is not disturbed.
Conroy is aggressive.
Garrick is tall.Someone being wrong is equivalent to being disturbed.
Someone who is tall is always not aggressive.
If Conroy is not disturbed and Hubert is tall, then Addison is agreeable.
Someone who is eithor not agreeable or not wrong is always stormy.
It can be concluded that Addison is aggressive once knowing that Hubert is not stormy and Hubert is not tall.
Someone being both stormy and tall is equivalent to being not agreeable.
Someone being both not stormy and disturbed is equivalent to being aggressive and tall.
Someone is not aggressive and disturbed if and only if he is tall.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Conroy is not agreeable and Garrick is not stormy.
If there is at least one people who is stormy, then Martin is not tall and Conroy is agreeable.
Garrick being not aggressive or Hubert being agreeable implies that Addison is wrong.
Conroy is not stormy if and only if Martin is aggressive and Conroy is not tall. | Hubert is not disturbed. | neutral |
Clark is stormy.
Garrick is agreeable.
Conroy is not agreeable.
Clark is disturbed.
Addison is wrong.
Clark is agreeable.
Conroy is not wrong.
Martin is disturbed.
Martin is not tall.
Conroy is not disturbed.
Conroy is aggressive.
Garrick is tall.Someone being wrong is equivalent to being disturbed.
Someone who is tall is always not aggressive.
If Conroy is not disturbed and Hubert is tall, then Addison is agreeable.
Someone who is eithor not agreeable or not wrong is always stormy.
It can be concluded that Addison is aggressive once knowing that Hubert is not stormy and Hubert is not tall.
Someone being both stormy and tall is equivalent to being not agreeable.
Someone being both not stormy and disturbed is equivalent to being aggressive and tall.
Someone is not aggressive and disturbed if and only if he is tall.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Conroy is not agreeable and Garrick is not stormy.
If there is at least one people who is stormy, then Martin is not tall and Conroy is agreeable.
Garrick being not aggressive or Hubert being agreeable implies that Addison is wrong.
Conroy is not stormy if and only if Martin is aggressive and Conroy is not tall. | Conroy is aggressive. | self_contradiction |
Channing is not neat.
Sean is not sufficient.
Carl is superior.
Ross is latter.
Kurt is latter.
Kurt is clear.
Hannah is neat.
Hannah is not ashamed.
Otis is not clear.
Carl is clear.
Otis is not superior.
Ross is ashamed.If there is at least one people who is not neat, then Otis is ashamed and Hannah is sufficient.
If Ross is latter, then Hannah is not clear and Otis is neat, and vice versa.
Someone is not neat if and only if he is clear.
It can be concluded that Hannah is neat once knowing that Kurt is not ashamed or Otis is not sufficient.
If someone is not clear or he is superior, then he is ashamed.
Carl being not neat implies that Ross is clear.
If there is someone who is both not sufficient and ashamed, then Sean is clear.
If someone is not neat, then he is both not ashamed and sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Kurt is superior and Channing is not latter.
If Carl is not clear, then Otis is sufficient, and vice versa.
Otis being neat and Carl being not superior imply that Channing is clear.
If Ross is not clear or Ross is ashamed, then Hannah is not superior. | Ross is not ashamed. | self_contradiction |
Channing is not neat.
Sean is not sufficient.
Carl is superior.
Ross is latter.
Kurt is latter.
Kurt is clear.
Hannah is neat.
Hannah is not ashamed.
Otis is not clear.
Carl is clear.
Otis is not superior.
Ross is ashamed.If there is at least one people who is not neat, then Otis is ashamed and Hannah is sufficient.
If Ross is latter, then Hannah is not clear and Otis is neat, and vice versa.
Someone is not neat if and only if he is clear.
It can be concluded that Hannah is neat once knowing that Kurt is not ashamed or Otis is not sufficient.
If someone is not clear or he is superior, then he is ashamed.
Carl being not neat implies that Ross is clear.
If there is someone who is both not sufficient and ashamed, then Sean is clear.
If someone is not neat, then he is both not ashamed and sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Kurt is superior and Channing is not latter.
If Carl is not clear, then Otis is sufficient, and vice versa.
Otis being neat and Carl being not superior imply that Channing is clear.
If Ross is not clear or Ross is ashamed, then Hannah is not superior. | Channing is sufficient. | entailment |
Channing is not neat.
Sean is not sufficient.
Carl is superior.
Ross is latter.
Kurt is latter.
Kurt is clear.
Hannah is neat.
Hannah is not ashamed.
Otis is not clear.
Carl is clear.
Otis is not superior.
Ross is ashamed.If there is at least one people who is not neat, then Otis is ashamed and Hannah is sufficient.
If Ross is latter, then Hannah is not clear and Otis is neat, and vice versa.
Someone is not neat if and only if he is clear.
It can be concluded that Hannah is neat once knowing that Kurt is not ashamed or Otis is not sufficient.
If someone is not clear or he is superior, then he is ashamed.
Carl being not neat implies that Ross is clear.
If there is someone who is both not sufficient and ashamed, then Sean is clear.
If someone is not neat, then he is both not ashamed and sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Kurt is superior and Channing is not latter.
If Carl is not clear, then Otis is sufficient, and vice versa.
Otis being neat and Carl being not superior imply that Channing is clear.
If Ross is not clear or Ross is ashamed, then Hannah is not superior. | Carl is ashamed. | self_contradiction |
Channing is not neat.
Sean is not sufficient.
Carl is superior.
Ross is latter.
Kurt is latter.
Kurt is clear.
Hannah is neat.
Hannah is not ashamed.
Otis is not clear.
Carl is clear.
Otis is not superior.
Ross is ashamed.If there is at least one people who is not neat, then Otis is ashamed and Hannah is sufficient.
If Ross is latter, then Hannah is not clear and Otis is neat, and vice versa.
Someone is not neat if and only if he is clear.
It can be concluded that Hannah is neat once knowing that Kurt is not ashamed or Otis is not sufficient.
If someone is not clear or he is superior, then he is ashamed.
Carl being not neat implies that Ross is clear.
If there is someone who is both not sufficient and ashamed, then Sean is clear.
If someone is not neat, then he is both not ashamed and sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Kurt is superior and Channing is not latter.
If Carl is not clear, then Otis is sufficient, and vice versa.
Otis being neat and Carl being not superior imply that Channing is clear.
If Ross is not clear or Ross is ashamed, then Hannah is not superior. | Otis is not superior. | entailment |
Channing is not neat.
Sean is not sufficient.
Carl is superior.
Ross is latter.
Kurt is latter.
Kurt is clear.
Hannah is neat.
Hannah is not ashamed.
Otis is not clear.
Carl is clear.
Otis is not superior.
Ross is ashamed.If there is at least one people who is not neat, then Otis is ashamed and Hannah is sufficient.
If Ross is latter, then Hannah is not clear and Otis is neat, and vice versa.
Someone is not neat if and only if he is clear.
It can be concluded that Hannah is neat once knowing that Kurt is not ashamed or Otis is not sufficient.
If someone is not clear or he is superior, then he is ashamed.
Carl being not neat implies that Ross is clear.
If there is someone who is both not sufficient and ashamed, then Sean is clear.
If someone is not neat, then he is both not ashamed and sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Kurt is superior and Channing is not latter.
If Carl is not clear, then Otis is sufficient, and vice versa.
Otis being neat and Carl being not superior imply that Channing is clear.
If Ross is not clear or Ross is ashamed, then Hannah is not superior. | Carl is sufficient. | entailment |
Channing is not neat.
Sean is not sufficient.
Carl is superior.
Ross is latter.
Kurt is latter.
Kurt is clear.
Hannah is neat.
Hannah is not ashamed.
Otis is not clear.
Carl is clear.
Otis is not superior.
Ross is ashamed.If there is at least one people who is not neat, then Otis is ashamed and Hannah is sufficient.
If Ross is latter, then Hannah is not clear and Otis is neat, and vice versa.
Someone is not neat if and only if he is clear.
It can be concluded that Hannah is neat once knowing that Kurt is not ashamed or Otis is not sufficient.
If someone is not clear or he is superior, then he is ashamed.
Carl being not neat implies that Ross is clear.
If there is someone who is both not sufficient and ashamed, then Sean is clear.
If someone is not neat, then he is both not ashamed and sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Kurt is superior and Channing is not latter.
If Carl is not clear, then Otis is sufficient, and vice versa.
Otis being neat and Carl being not superior imply that Channing is clear.
If Ross is not clear or Ross is ashamed, then Hannah is not superior. | Channing is not sufficient. | contradiction |
Channing is not neat.
Sean is not sufficient.
Carl is superior.
Ross is latter.
Kurt is latter.
Kurt is clear.
Hannah is neat.
Hannah is not ashamed.
Otis is not clear.
Carl is clear.
Otis is not superior.
Ross is ashamed.If there is at least one people who is not neat, then Otis is ashamed and Hannah is sufficient.
If Ross is latter, then Hannah is not clear and Otis is neat, and vice versa.
Someone is not neat if and only if he is clear.
It can be concluded that Hannah is neat once knowing that Kurt is not ashamed or Otis is not sufficient.
If someone is not clear or he is superior, then he is ashamed.
Carl being not neat implies that Ross is clear.
If there is someone who is both not sufficient and ashamed, then Sean is clear.
If someone is not neat, then he is both not ashamed and sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Kurt is superior and Channing is not latter.
If Carl is not clear, then Otis is sufficient, and vice versa.
Otis being neat and Carl being not superior imply that Channing is clear.
If Ross is not clear or Ross is ashamed, then Hannah is not superior. | Channing is not ashamed. | entailment |
Channing is not neat.
Sean is not sufficient.
Carl is superior.
Ross is latter.
Kurt is latter.
Kurt is clear.
Hannah is neat.
Hannah is not ashamed.
Otis is not clear.
Carl is clear.
Otis is not superior.
Ross is ashamed.If there is at least one people who is not neat, then Otis is ashamed and Hannah is sufficient.
If Ross is latter, then Hannah is not clear and Otis is neat, and vice versa.
Someone is not neat if and only if he is clear.
It can be concluded that Hannah is neat once knowing that Kurt is not ashamed or Otis is not sufficient.
If someone is not clear or he is superior, then he is ashamed.
Carl being not neat implies that Ross is clear.
If there is someone who is both not sufficient and ashamed, then Sean is clear.
If someone is not neat, then he is both not ashamed and sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Kurt is superior and Channing is not latter.
If Carl is not clear, then Otis is sufficient, and vice versa.
Otis being neat and Carl being not superior imply that Channing is clear.
If Ross is not clear or Ross is ashamed, then Hannah is not superior. | Otis is not latter. | neutral |
Channing is not neat.
Sean is not sufficient.
Carl is superior.
Ross is latter.
Kurt is latter.
Kurt is clear.
Hannah is neat.
Hannah is not ashamed.
Otis is not clear.
Carl is clear.
Otis is not superior.
Ross is ashamed.If there is at least one people who is not neat, then Otis is ashamed and Hannah is sufficient.
If Ross is latter, then Hannah is not clear and Otis is neat, and vice versa.
Someone is not neat if and only if he is clear.
It can be concluded that Hannah is neat once knowing that Kurt is not ashamed or Otis is not sufficient.
If someone is not clear or he is superior, then he is ashamed.
Carl being not neat implies that Ross is clear.
If there is someone who is both not sufficient and ashamed, then Sean is clear.
If someone is not neat, then he is both not ashamed and sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Kurt is superior and Channing is not latter.
If Carl is not clear, then Otis is sufficient, and vice versa.
Otis being neat and Carl being not superior imply that Channing is clear.
If Ross is not clear or Ross is ashamed, then Hannah is not superior. | Ross is superior. | neutral |
Channing is not neat.
Sean is not sufficient.
Carl is superior.
Ross is latter.
Kurt is latter.
Kurt is clear.
Hannah is neat.
Hannah is not ashamed.
Otis is not clear.
Carl is clear.
Otis is not superior.
Ross is ashamed.If there is at least one people who is not neat, then Otis is ashamed and Hannah is sufficient.
If Ross is latter, then Hannah is not clear and Otis is neat, and vice versa.
Someone is not neat if and only if he is clear.
It can be concluded that Hannah is neat once knowing that Kurt is not ashamed or Otis is not sufficient.
If someone is not clear or he is superior, then he is ashamed.
Carl being not neat implies that Ross is clear.
If there is someone who is both not sufficient and ashamed, then Sean is clear.
If someone is not neat, then he is both not ashamed and sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Kurt is superior and Channing is not latter.
If Carl is not clear, then Otis is sufficient, and vice versa.
Otis being neat and Carl being not superior imply that Channing is clear.
If Ross is not clear or Ross is ashamed, then Hannah is not superior. | Sean is not ashamed. | neutral |
Channing is not neat.
Sean is not sufficient.
Carl is superior.
Ross is latter.
Kurt is latter.
Kurt is clear.
Hannah is neat.
Hannah is not ashamed.
Otis is not clear.
Carl is clear.
Otis is not superior.
Ross is ashamed.If there is at least one people who is not neat, then Otis is ashamed and Hannah is sufficient.
If Ross is latter, then Hannah is not clear and Otis is neat, and vice versa.
Someone is not neat if and only if he is clear.
It can be concluded that Hannah is neat once knowing that Kurt is not ashamed or Otis is not sufficient.
If someone is not clear or he is superior, then he is ashamed.
Carl being not neat implies that Ross is clear.
If there is someone who is both not sufficient and ashamed, then Sean is clear.
If someone is not neat, then he is both not ashamed and sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Kurt is superior and Channing is not latter.
If Carl is not clear, then Otis is sufficient, and vice versa.
Otis being neat and Carl being not superior imply that Channing is clear.
If Ross is not clear or Ross is ashamed, then Hannah is not superior. | Hannah is not ashamed. | self_contradiction |
Channing is not neat.
Sean is not sufficient.
Carl is superior.
Ross is latter.
Kurt is latter.
Kurt is clear.
Hannah is neat.
Hannah is not ashamed.
Otis is not clear.
Carl is clear.
Otis is not superior.
Ross is ashamed.If there is at least one people who is not neat, then Otis is ashamed and Hannah is sufficient.
If Ross is latter, then Hannah is not clear and Otis is neat, and vice versa.
Someone is not neat if and only if he is clear.
It can be concluded that Hannah is neat once knowing that Kurt is not ashamed or Otis is not sufficient.
If someone is not clear or he is superior, then he is ashamed.
Carl being not neat implies that Ross is clear.
If there is someone who is both not sufficient and ashamed, then Sean is clear.
If someone is not neat, then he is both not ashamed and sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Kurt is superior and Channing is not latter.
If Carl is not clear, then Otis is sufficient, and vice versa.
Otis being neat and Carl being not superior imply that Channing is clear.
If Ross is not clear or Ross is ashamed, then Hannah is not superior. | Sean is not neat. | neutral |
Channing is not neat.
Sean is not sufficient.
Carl is superior.
Ross is latter.
Kurt is latter.
Kurt is clear.
Hannah is neat.
Hannah is not ashamed.
Otis is not clear.
Carl is clear.
Otis is not superior.
Ross is ashamed.If there is at least one people who is not neat, then Otis is ashamed and Hannah is sufficient.
If Ross is latter, then Hannah is not clear and Otis is neat, and vice versa.
Someone is not neat if and only if he is clear.
It can be concluded that Hannah is neat once knowing that Kurt is not ashamed or Otis is not sufficient.
If someone is not clear or he is superior, then he is ashamed.
Carl being not neat implies that Ross is clear.
If there is someone who is both not sufficient and ashamed, then Sean is clear.
If someone is not neat, then he is both not ashamed and sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Kurt is superior and Channing is not latter.
If Carl is not clear, then Otis is sufficient, and vice versa.
Otis being neat and Carl being not superior imply that Channing is clear.
If Ross is not clear or Ross is ashamed, then Hannah is not superior. | Kurt is not ashamed. | self_contradiction |
Channing is not neat.
Sean is not sufficient.
Carl is superior.
Ross is latter.
Kurt is latter.
Kurt is clear.
Hannah is neat.
Hannah is not ashamed.
Otis is not clear.
Carl is clear.
Otis is not superior.
Ross is ashamed.If there is at least one people who is not neat, then Otis is ashamed and Hannah is sufficient.
If Ross is latter, then Hannah is not clear and Otis is neat, and vice versa.
Someone is not neat if and only if he is clear.
It can be concluded that Hannah is neat once knowing that Kurt is not ashamed or Otis is not sufficient.
If someone is not clear or he is superior, then he is ashamed.
Carl being not neat implies that Ross is clear.
If there is someone who is both not sufficient and ashamed, then Sean is clear.
If someone is not neat, then he is both not ashamed and sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Kurt is superior and Channing is not latter.
If Carl is not clear, then Otis is sufficient, and vice versa.
Otis being neat and Carl being not superior imply that Channing is clear.
If Ross is not clear or Ross is ashamed, then Hannah is not superior. | Channing is not clear. | contradiction |
Channing is not neat.
Sean is not sufficient.
Carl is superior.
Ross is latter.
Kurt is latter.
Kurt is clear.
Hannah is neat.
Hannah is not ashamed.
Otis is not clear.
Carl is clear.
Otis is not superior.
Ross is ashamed.If there is at least one people who is not neat, then Otis is ashamed and Hannah is sufficient.
If Ross is latter, then Hannah is not clear and Otis is neat, and vice versa.
Someone is not neat if and only if he is clear.
It can be concluded that Hannah is neat once knowing that Kurt is not ashamed or Otis is not sufficient.
If someone is not clear or he is superior, then he is ashamed.
Carl being not neat implies that Ross is clear.
If there is someone who is both not sufficient and ashamed, then Sean is clear.
If someone is not neat, then he is both not ashamed and sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Kurt is superior and Channing is not latter.
If Carl is not clear, then Otis is sufficient, and vice versa.
Otis being neat and Carl being not superior imply that Channing is clear.
If Ross is not clear or Ross is ashamed, then Hannah is not superior. | Otis is not ashamed. | contradiction |
Channing is not neat.
Sean is not sufficient.
Carl is superior.
Ross is latter.
Kurt is latter.
Kurt is clear.
Hannah is neat.
Hannah is not ashamed.
Otis is not clear.
Carl is clear.
Otis is not superior.
Ross is ashamed.If there is at least one people who is not neat, then Otis is ashamed and Hannah is sufficient.
If Ross is latter, then Hannah is not clear and Otis is neat, and vice versa.
Someone is not neat if and only if he is clear.
It can be concluded that Hannah is neat once knowing that Kurt is not ashamed or Otis is not sufficient.
If someone is not clear or he is superior, then he is ashamed.
Carl being not neat implies that Ross is clear.
If there is someone who is both not sufficient and ashamed, then Sean is clear.
If someone is not neat, then he is both not ashamed and sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Kurt is superior and Channing is not latter.
If Carl is not clear, then Otis is sufficient, and vice versa.
Otis being neat and Carl being not superior imply that Channing is clear.
If Ross is not clear or Ross is ashamed, then Hannah is not superior. | Carl is not superior. | contradiction |
Channing is not neat.
Sean is not sufficient.
Carl is superior.
Ross is latter.
Kurt is latter.
Kurt is clear.
Hannah is neat.
Hannah is not ashamed.
Otis is not clear.
Carl is clear.
Otis is not superior.
Ross is ashamed.If there is at least one people who is not neat, then Otis is ashamed and Hannah is sufficient.
If Ross is latter, then Hannah is not clear and Otis is neat, and vice versa.
Someone is not neat if and only if he is clear.
It can be concluded that Hannah is neat once knowing that Kurt is not ashamed or Otis is not sufficient.
If someone is not clear or he is superior, then he is ashamed.
Carl being not neat implies that Ross is clear.
If there is someone who is both not sufficient and ashamed, then Sean is clear.
If someone is not neat, then he is both not ashamed and sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Kurt is superior and Channing is not latter.
If Carl is not clear, then Otis is sufficient, and vice versa.
Otis being neat and Carl being not superior imply that Channing is clear.
If Ross is not clear or Ross is ashamed, then Hannah is not superior. | Sean is neat. | neutral |
Channing is not neat.
Sean is not sufficient.
Carl is superior.
Ross is latter.
Kurt is latter.
Kurt is clear.
Hannah is neat.
Hannah is not ashamed.
Otis is not clear.
Carl is clear.
Otis is not superior.
Ross is ashamed.If there is at least one people who is not neat, then Otis is ashamed and Hannah is sufficient.
If Ross is latter, then Hannah is not clear and Otis is neat, and vice versa.
Someone is not neat if and only if he is clear.
It can be concluded that Hannah is neat once knowing that Kurt is not ashamed or Otis is not sufficient.
If someone is not clear or he is superior, then he is ashamed.
Carl being not neat implies that Ross is clear.
If there is someone who is both not sufficient and ashamed, then Sean is clear.
If someone is not neat, then he is both not ashamed and sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Kurt is superior and Channing is not latter.
If Carl is not clear, then Otis is sufficient, and vice versa.
Otis being neat and Carl being not superior imply that Channing is clear.
If Ross is not clear or Ross is ashamed, then Hannah is not superior. | Hannah is clear. | contradiction |
Channing is not neat.
Sean is not sufficient.
Carl is superior.
Ross is latter.
Kurt is latter.
Kurt is clear.
Hannah is neat.
Hannah is not ashamed.
Otis is not clear.
Carl is clear.
Otis is not superior.
Ross is ashamed.If there is at least one people who is not neat, then Otis is ashamed and Hannah is sufficient.
If Ross is latter, then Hannah is not clear and Otis is neat, and vice versa.
Someone is not neat if and only if he is clear.
It can be concluded that Hannah is neat once knowing that Kurt is not ashamed or Otis is not sufficient.
If someone is not clear or he is superior, then he is ashamed.
Carl being not neat implies that Ross is clear.
If there is someone who is both not sufficient and ashamed, then Sean is clear.
If someone is not neat, then he is both not ashamed and sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Kurt is superior and Channing is not latter.
If Carl is not clear, then Otis is sufficient, and vice versa.
Otis being neat and Carl being not superior imply that Channing is clear.
If Ross is not clear or Ross is ashamed, then Hannah is not superior. | Carl is superior. | entailment |
Channing is not neat.
Sean is not sufficient.
Carl is superior.
Ross is latter.
Kurt is latter.
Kurt is clear.
Hannah is neat.
Hannah is not ashamed.
Otis is not clear.
Carl is clear.
Otis is not superior.
Ross is ashamed.If there is at least one people who is not neat, then Otis is ashamed and Hannah is sufficient.
If Ross is latter, then Hannah is not clear and Otis is neat, and vice versa.
Someone is not neat if and only if he is clear.
It can be concluded that Hannah is neat once knowing that Kurt is not ashamed or Otis is not sufficient.
If someone is not clear or he is superior, then he is ashamed.
Carl being not neat implies that Ross is clear.
If there is someone who is both not sufficient and ashamed, then Sean is clear.
If someone is not neat, then he is both not ashamed and sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Kurt is superior and Channing is not latter.
If Carl is not clear, then Otis is sufficient, and vice versa.
Otis being neat and Carl being not superior imply that Channing is clear.
If Ross is not clear or Ross is ashamed, then Hannah is not superior. | Hannah is ashamed. | self_contradiction |
Ethan is healthy.
Amery is rare.
Casper is not rare.
Blanche is intelligent.
Blanche is not healthy.
Helena is not beige.
Phoebe is not rare.
Clifford is beige.
Phoebe is healthy.
Clifford is not nice.
Clifford is intelligent.
Phoebe is not intelligent.if there is at least one people who is not rare and not nice, then Clifford is not beige and Casper is intelligent.
Ethan being not rare is equivalent to Clifford being not realistic.
It can be concluded that Helena is intelligent once knowing that Ethan is rare.
Someone is not beige and healthy if and only if he is realistic.
Someone is not healthy if and only if he is rare.
If there is at least one people who is either realistic or not intelligent, then Blanche is not beige and Amery is not healthy.
Blanche being not intelligent is equivalent to Phoebe being realistic.
If there is someone who is realistic, then Amery is not intelligent.
Someone is beige and not healthy if and only if he is intelligent.
If someone is intelligent and beige, then he is both healthy and not realistic, and vice versa.
Phoebe being not intelligent or Helena being realistic implies that Helena is healthy.
If Helena is not rare and Amery is beige, then Clifford is not healthy. | Phoebe is not rare. | entailment |
Ethan is healthy.
Amery is rare.
Casper is not rare.
Blanche is intelligent.
Blanche is not healthy.
Helena is not beige.
Phoebe is not rare.
Clifford is beige.
Phoebe is healthy.
Clifford is not nice.
Clifford is intelligent.
Phoebe is not intelligent.if there is at least one people who is not rare and not nice, then Clifford is not beige and Casper is intelligent.
Ethan being not rare is equivalent to Clifford being not realistic.
It can be concluded that Helena is intelligent once knowing that Ethan is rare.
Someone is not beige and healthy if and only if he is realistic.
Someone is not healthy if and only if he is rare.
If there is at least one people who is either realistic or not intelligent, then Blanche is not beige and Amery is not healthy.
Blanche being not intelligent is equivalent to Phoebe being realistic.
If there is someone who is realistic, then Amery is not intelligent.
Someone is beige and not healthy if and only if he is intelligent.
If someone is intelligent and beige, then he is both healthy and not realistic, and vice versa.
Phoebe being not intelligent or Helena being realistic implies that Helena is healthy.
If Helena is not rare and Amery is beige, then Clifford is not healthy. | Clifford is not realistic. | entailment |
Ethan is healthy.
Amery is rare.
Casper is not rare.
Blanche is intelligent.
Blanche is not healthy.
Helena is not beige.
Phoebe is not rare.
Clifford is beige.
Phoebe is healthy.
Clifford is not nice.
Clifford is intelligent.
Phoebe is not intelligent.if there is at least one people who is not rare and not nice, then Clifford is not beige and Casper is intelligent.
Ethan being not rare is equivalent to Clifford being not realistic.
It can be concluded that Helena is intelligent once knowing that Ethan is rare.
Someone is not beige and healthy if and only if he is realistic.
Someone is not healthy if and only if he is rare.
If there is at least one people who is either realistic or not intelligent, then Blanche is not beige and Amery is not healthy.
Blanche being not intelligent is equivalent to Phoebe being realistic.
If there is someone who is realistic, then Amery is not intelligent.
Someone is beige and not healthy if and only if he is intelligent.
If someone is intelligent and beige, then he is both healthy and not realistic, and vice versa.
Phoebe being not intelligent or Helena being realistic implies that Helena is healthy.
If Helena is not rare and Amery is beige, then Clifford is not healthy. | Ethan is not intelligent. | neutral |
Ethan is healthy.
Amery is rare.
Casper is not rare.
Blanche is intelligent.
Blanche is not healthy.
Helena is not beige.
Phoebe is not rare.
Clifford is beige.
Phoebe is healthy.
Clifford is not nice.
Clifford is intelligent.
Phoebe is not intelligent.if there is at least one people who is not rare and not nice, then Clifford is not beige and Casper is intelligent.
Ethan being not rare is equivalent to Clifford being not realistic.
It can be concluded that Helena is intelligent once knowing that Ethan is rare.
Someone is not beige and healthy if and only if he is realistic.
Someone is not healthy if and only if he is rare.
If there is at least one people who is either realistic or not intelligent, then Blanche is not beige and Amery is not healthy.
Blanche being not intelligent is equivalent to Phoebe being realistic.
If there is someone who is realistic, then Amery is not intelligent.
Someone is beige and not healthy if and only if he is intelligent.
If someone is intelligent and beige, then he is both healthy and not realistic, and vice versa.
Phoebe being not intelligent or Helena being realistic implies that Helena is healthy.
If Helena is not rare and Amery is beige, then Clifford is not healthy. | Helena is realistic. | entailment |
Ethan is healthy.
Amery is rare.
Casper is not rare.
Blanche is intelligent.
Blanche is not healthy.
Helena is not beige.
Phoebe is not rare.
Clifford is beige.
Phoebe is healthy.
Clifford is not nice.
Clifford is intelligent.
Phoebe is not intelligent.if there is at least one people who is not rare and not nice, then Clifford is not beige and Casper is intelligent.
Ethan being not rare is equivalent to Clifford being not realistic.
It can be concluded that Helena is intelligent once knowing that Ethan is rare.
Someone is not beige and healthy if and only if he is realistic.
Someone is not healthy if and only if he is rare.
If there is at least one people who is either realistic or not intelligent, then Blanche is not beige and Amery is not healthy.
Blanche being not intelligent is equivalent to Phoebe being realistic.
If there is someone who is realistic, then Amery is not intelligent.
Someone is beige and not healthy if and only if he is intelligent.
If someone is intelligent and beige, then he is both healthy and not realistic, and vice versa.
Phoebe being not intelligent or Helena being realistic implies that Helena is healthy.
If Helena is not rare and Amery is beige, then Clifford is not healthy. | Phoebe is not realistic. | neutral |
Ethan is healthy.
Amery is rare.
Casper is not rare.
Blanche is intelligent.
Blanche is not healthy.
Helena is not beige.
Phoebe is not rare.
Clifford is beige.
Phoebe is healthy.
Clifford is not nice.
Clifford is intelligent.
Phoebe is not intelligent.if there is at least one people who is not rare and not nice, then Clifford is not beige and Casper is intelligent.
Ethan being not rare is equivalent to Clifford being not realistic.
It can be concluded that Helena is intelligent once knowing that Ethan is rare.
Someone is not beige and healthy if and only if he is realistic.
Someone is not healthy if and only if he is rare.
If there is at least one people who is either realistic or not intelligent, then Blanche is not beige and Amery is not healthy.
Blanche being not intelligent is equivalent to Phoebe being realistic.
If there is someone who is realistic, then Amery is not intelligent.
Someone is beige and not healthy if and only if he is intelligent.
If someone is intelligent and beige, then he is both healthy and not realistic, and vice versa.
Phoebe being not intelligent or Helena being realistic implies that Helena is healthy.
If Helena is not rare and Amery is beige, then Clifford is not healthy. | Blanche is beige. | self_contradiction |
Ethan is healthy.
Amery is rare.
Casper is not rare.
Blanche is intelligent.
Blanche is not healthy.
Helena is not beige.
Phoebe is not rare.
Clifford is beige.
Phoebe is healthy.
Clifford is not nice.
Clifford is intelligent.
Phoebe is not intelligent.if there is at least one people who is not rare and not nice, then Clifford is not beige and Casper is intelligent.
Ethan being not rare is equivalent to Clifford being not realistic.
It can be concluded that Helena is intelligent once knowing that Ethan is rare.
Someone is not beige and healthy if and only if he is realistic.
Someone is not healthy if and only if he is rare.
If there is at least one people who is either realistic or not intelligent, then Blanche is not beige and Amery is not healthy.
Blanche being not intelligent is equivalent to Phoebe being realistic.
If there is someone who is realistic, then Amery is not intelligent.
Someone is beige and not healthy if and only if he is intelligent.
If someone is intelligent and beige, then he is both healthy and not realistic, and vice versa.
Phoebe being not intelligent or Helena being realistic implies that Helena is healthy.
If Helena is not rare and Amery is beige, then Clifford is not healthy. | Amery is intelligent. | contradiction |
Ethan is healthy.
Amery is rare.
Casper is not rare.
Blanche is intelligent.
Blanche is not healthy.
Helena is not beige.
Phoebe is not rare.
Clifford is beige.
Phoebe is healthy.
Clifford is not nice.
Clifford is intelligent.
Phoebe is not intelligent.if there is at least one people who is not rare and not nice, then Clifford is not beige and Casper is intelligent.
Ethan being not rare is equivalent to Clifford being not realistic.
It can be concluded that Helena is intelligent once knowing that Ethan is rare.
Someone is not beige and healthy if and only if he is realistic.
Someone is not healthy if and only if he is rare.
If there is at least one people who is either realistic or not intelligent, then Blanche is not beige and Amery is not healthy.
Blanche being not intelligent is equivalent to Phoebe being realistic.
If there is someone who is realistic, then Amery is not intelligent.
Someone is beige and not healthy if and only if he is intelligent.
If someone is intelligent and beige, then he is both healthy and not realistic, and vice versa.
Phoebe being not intelligent or Helena being realistic implies that Helena is healthy.
If Helena is not rare and Amery is beige, then Clifford is not healthy. | Helena is not realistic. | contradiction |
Ethan is healthy.
Amery is rare.
Casper is not rare.
Blanche is intelligent.
Blanche is not healthy.
Helena is not beige.
Phoebe is not rare.
Clifford is beige.
Phoebe is healthy.
Clifford is not nice.
Clifford is intelligent.
Phoebe is not intelligent.if there is at least one people who is not rare and not nice, then Clifford is not beige and Casper is intelligent.
Ethan being not rare is equivalent to Clifford being not realistic.
It can be concluded that Helena is intelligent once knowing that Ethan is rare.
Someone is not beige and healthy if and only if he is realistic.
Someone is not healthy if and only if he is rare.
If there is at least one people who is either realistic or not intelligent, then Blanche is not beige and Amery is not healthy.
Blanche being not intelligent is equivalent to Phoebe being realistic.
If there is someone who is realistic, then Amery is not intelligent.
Someone is beige and not healthy if and only if he is intelligent.
If someone is intelligent and beige, then he is both healthy and not realistic, and vice versa.
Phoebe being not intelligent or Helena being realistic implies that Helena is healthy.
If Helena is not rare and Amery is beige, then Clifford is not healthy. | Blanche is realistic. | self_contradiction |
Ethan is healthy.
Amery is rare.
Casper is not rare.
Blanche is intelligent.
Blanche is not healthy.
Helena is not beige.
Phoebe is not rare.
Clifford is beige.
Phoebe is healthy.
Clifford is not nice.
Clifford is intelligent.
Phoebe is not intelligent.if there is at least one people who is not rare and not nice, then Clifford is not beige and Casper is intelligent.
Ethan being not rare is equivalent to Clifford being not realistic.
It can be concluded that Helena is intelligent once knowing that Ethan is rare.
Someone is not beige and healthy if and only if he is realistic.
Someone is not healthy if and only if he is rare.
If there is at least one people who is either realistic or not intelligent, then Blanche is not beige and Amery is not healthy.
Blanche being not intelligent is equivalent to Phoebe being realistic.
If there is someone who is realistic, then Amery is not intelligent.
Someone is beige and not healthy if and only if he is intelligent.
If someone is intelligent and beige, then he is both healthy and not realistic, and vice versa.
Phoebe being not intelligent or Helena being realistic implies that Helena is healthy.
If Helena is not rare and Amery is beige, then Clifford is not healthy. | Clifford is healthy. | self_contradiction |
Ethan is healthy.
Amery is rare.
Casper is not rare.
Blanche is intelligent.
Blanche is not healthy.
Helena is not beige.
Phoebe is not rare.
Clifford is beige.
Phoebe is healthy.
Clifford is not nice.
Clifford is intelligent.
Phoebe is not intelligent.if there is at least one people who is not rare and not nice, then Clifford is not beige and Casper is intelligent.
Ethan being not rare is equivalent to Clifford being not realistic.
It can be concluded that Helena is intelligent once knowing that Ethan is rare.
Someone is not beige and healthy if and only if he is realistic.
Someone is not healthy if and only if he is rare.
If there is at least one people who is either realistic or not intelligent, then Blanche is not beige and Amery is not healthy.
Blanche being not intelligent is equivalent to Phoebe being realistic.
If there is someone who is realistic, then Amery is not intelligent.
Someone is beige and not healthy if and only if he is intelligent.
If someone is intelligent and beige, then he is both healthy and not realistic, and vice versa.
Phoebe being not intelligent or Helena being realistic implies that Helena is healthy.
If Helena is not rare and Amery is beige, then Clifford is not healthy. | Phoebe is not nice. | neutral |
Ethan is healthy.
Amery is rare.
Casper is not rare.
Blanche is intelligent.
Blanche is not healthy.
Helena is not beige.
Phoebe is not rare.
Clifford is beige.
Phoebe is healthy.
Clifford is not nice.
Clifford is intelligent.
Phoebe is not intelligent.if there is at least one people who is not rare and not nice, then Clifford is not beige and Casper is intelligent.
Ethan being not rare is equivalent to Clifford being not realistic.
It can be concluded that Helena is intelligent once knowing that Ethan is rare.
Someone is not beige and healthy if and only if he is realistic.
Someone is not healthy if and only if he is rare.
If there is at least one people who is either realistic or not intelligent, then Blanche is not beige and Amery is not healthy.
Blanche being not intelligent is equivalent to Phoebe being realistic.
If there is someone who is realistic, then Amery is not intelligent.
Someone is beige and not healthy if and only if he is intelligent.
If someone is intelligent and beige, then he is both healthy and not realistic, and vice versa.
Phoebe being not intelligent or Helena being realistic implies that Helena is healthy.
If Helena is not rare and Amery is beige, then Clifford is not healthy. | Helena is intelligent. | neutral |
Ethan is healthy.
Amery is rare.
Casper is not rare.
Blanche is intelligent.
Blanche is not healthy.
Helena is not beige.
Phoebe is not rare.
Clifford is beige.
Phoebe is healthy.
Clifford is not nice.
Clifford is intelligent.
Phoebe is not intelligent.if there is at least one people who is not rare and not nice, then Clifford is not beige and Casper is intelligent.
Ethan being not rare is equivalent to Clifford being not realistic.
It can be concluded that Helena is intelligent once knowing that Ethan is rare.
Someone is not beige and healthy if and only if he is realistic.
Someone is not healthy if and only if he is rare.
If there is at least one people who is either realistic or not intelligent, then Blanche is not beige and Amery is not healthy.
Blanche being not intelligent is equivalent to Phoebe being realistic.
If there is someone who is realistic, then Amery is not intelligent.
Someone is beige and not healthy if and only if he is intelligent.
If someone is intelligent and beige, then he is both healthy and not realistic, and vice versa.
Phoebe being not intelligent or Helena being realistic implies that Helena is healthy.
If Helena is not rare and Amery is beige, then Clifford is not healthy. | Blanche is not intelligent. | contradiction |
Ethan is healthy.
Amery is rare.
Casper is not rare.
Blanche is intelligent.
Blanche is not healthy.
Helena is not beige.
Phoebe is not rare.
Clifford is beige.
Phoebe is healthy.
Clifford is not nice.
Clifford is intelligent.
Phoebe is not intelligent.if there is at least one people who is not rare and not nice, then Clifford is not beige and Casper is intelligent.
Ethan being not rare is equivalent to Clifford being not realistic.
It can be concluded that Helena is intelligent once knowing that Ethan is rare.
Someone is not beige and healthy if and only if he is realistic.
Someone is not healthy if and only if he is rare.
If there is at least one people who is either realistic or not intelligent, then Blanche is not beige and Amery is not healthy.
Blanche being not intelligent is equivalent to Phoebe being realistic.
If there is someone who is realistic, then Amery is not intelligent.
Someone is beige and not healthy if and only if he is intelligent.
If someone is intelligent and beige, then he is both healthy and not realistic, and vice versa.
Phoebe being not intelligent or Helena being realistic implies that Helena is healthy.
If Helena is not rare and Amery is beige, then Clifford is not healthy. | Casper is rare. | contradiction |
Ethan is healthy.
Amery is rare.
Casper is not rare.
Blanche is intelligent.
Blanche is not healthy.
Helena is not beige.
Phoebe is not rare.
Clifford is beige.
Phoebe is healthy.
Clifford is not nice.
Clifford is intelligent.
Phoebe is not intelligent.if there is at least one people who is not rare and not nice, then Clifford is not beige and Casper is intelligent.
Ethan being not rare is equivalent to Clifford being not realistic.
It can be concluded that Helena is intelligent once knowing that Ethan is rare.
Someone is not beige and healthy if and only if he is realistic.
Someone is not healthy if and only if he is rare.
If there is at least one people who is either realistic or not intelligent, then Blanche is not beige and Amery is not healthy.
Blanche being not intelligent is equivalent to Phoebe being realistic.
If there is someone who is realistic, then Amery is not intelligent.
Someone is beige and not healthy if and only if he is intelligent.
If someone is intelligent and beige, then he is both healthy and not realistic, and vice versa.
Phoebe being not intelligent or Helena being realistic implies that Helena is healthy.
If Helena is not rare and Amery is beige, then Clifford is not healthy. | Helena is beige. | contradiction |
Ethan is healthy.
Amery is rare.
Casper is not rare.
Blanche is intelligent.
Blanche is not healthy.
Helena is not beige.
Phoebe is not rare.
Clifford is beige.
Phoebe is healthy.
Clifford is not nice.
Clifford is intelligent.
Phoebe is not intelligent.if there is at least one people who is not rare and not nice, then Clifford is not beige and Casper is intelligent.
Ethan being not rare is equivalent to Clifford being not realistic.
It can be concluded that Helena is intelligent once knowing that Ethan is rare.
Someone is not beige and healthy if and only if he is realistic.
Someone is not healthy if and only if he is rare.
If there is at least one people who is either realistic or not intelligent, then Blanche is not beige and Amery is not healthy.
Blanche being not intelligent is equivalent to Phoebe being realistic.
If there is someone who is realistic, then Amery is not intelligent.
Someone is beige and not healthy if and only if he is intelligent.
If someone is intelligent and beige, then he is both healthy and not realistic, and vice versa.
Phoebe being not intelligent or Helena being realistic implies that Helena is healthy.
If Helena is not rare and Amery is beige, then Clifford is not healthy. | Phoebe is not beige. | neutral |
Ethan is healthy.
Amery is rare.
Casper is not rare.
Blanche is intelligent.
Blanche is not healthy.
Helena is not beige.
Phoebe is not rare.
Clifford is beige.
Phoebe is healthy.
Clifford is not nice.
Clifford is intelligent.
Phoebe is not intelligent.if there is at least one people who is not rare and not nice, then Clifford is not beige and Casper is intelligent.
Ethan being not rare is equivalent to Clifford being not realistic.
It can be concluded that Helena is intelligent once knowing that Ethan is rare.
Someone is not beige and healthy if and only if he is realistic.
Someone is not healthy if and only if he is rare.
If there is at least one people who is either realistic or not intelligent, then Blanche is not beige and Amery is not healthy.
Blanche being not intelligent is equivalent to Phoebe being realistic.
If there is someone who is realistic, then Amery is not intelligent.
Someone is beige and not healthy if and only if he is intelligent.
If someone is intelligent and beige, then he is both healthy and not realistic, and vice versa.
Phoebe being not intelligent or Helena being realistic implies that Helena is healthy.
If Helena is not rare and Amery is beige, then Clifford is not healthy. | Ethan is healthy. | entailment |
Ethan is healthy.
Amery is rare.
Casper is not rare.
Blanche is intelligent.
Blanche is not healthy.
Helena is not beige.
Phoebe is not rare.
Clifford is beige.
Phoebe is healthy.
Clifford is not nice.
Clifford is intelligent.
Phoebe is not intelligent.if there is at least one people who is not rare and not nice, then Clifford is not beige and Casper is intelligent.
Ethan being not rare is equivalent to Clifford being not realistic.
It can be concluded that Helena is intelligent once knowing that Ethan is rare.
Someone is not beige and healthy if and only if he is realistic.
Someone is not healthy if and only if he is rare.
If there is at least one people who is either realistic or not intelligent, then Blanche is not beige and Amery is not healthy.
Blanche being not intelligent is equivalent to Phoebe being realistic.
If there is someone who is realistic, then Amery is not intelligent.
Someone is beige and not healthy if and only if he is intelligent.
If someone is intelligent and beige, then he is both healthy and not realistic, and vice versa.
Phoebe being not intelligent or Helena being realistic implies that Helena is healthy.
If Helena is not rare and Amery is beige, then Clifford is not healthy. | Blanche is not healthy. | self_contradiction |
Ethan is healthy.
Amery is rare.
Casper is not rare.
Blanche is intelligent.
Blanche is not healthy.
Helena is not beige.
Phoebe is not rare.
Clifford is beige.
Phoebe is healthy.
Clifford is not nice.
Clifford is intelligent.
Phoebe is not intelligent.if there is at least one people who is not rare and not nice, then Clifford is not beige and Casper is intelligent.
Ethan being not rare is equivalent to Clifford being not realistic.
It can be concluded that Helena is intelligent once knowing that Ethan is rare.
Someone is not beige and healthy if and only if he is realistic.
Someone is not healthy if and only if he is rare.
If there is at least one people who is either realistic or not intelligent, then Blanche is not beige and Amery is not healthy.
Blanche being not intelligent is equivalent to Phoebe being realistic.
If there is someone who is realistic, then Amery is not intelligent.
Someone is beige and not healthy if and only if he is intelligent.
If someone is intelligent and beige, then he is both healthy and not realistic, and vice versa.
Phoebe being not intelligent or Helena being realistic implies that Helena is healthy.
If Helena is not rare and Amery is beige, then Clifford is not healthy. | Clifford is not healthy. | self_contradiction |
Ethan is healthy.
Amery is rare.
Casper is not rare.
Blanche is intelligent.
Blanche is not healthy.
Helena is not beige.
Phoebe is not rare.
Clifford is beige.
Phoebe is healthy.
Clifford is not nice.
Clifford is intelligent.
Phoebe is not intelligent.if there is at least one people who is not rare and not nice, then Clifford is not beige and Casper is intelligent.
Ethan being not rare is equivalent to Clifford being not realistic.
It can be concluded that Helena is intelligent once knowing that Ethan is rare.
Someone is not beige and healthy if and only if he is realistic.
Someone is not healthy if and only if he is rare.
If there is at least one people who is either realistic or not intelligent, then Blanche is not beige and Amery is not healthy.
Blanche being not intelligent is equivalent to Phoebe being realistic.
If there is someone who is realistic, then Amery is not intelligent.
Someone is beige and not healthy if and only if he is intelligent.
If someone is intelligent and beige, then he is both healthy and not realistic, and vice versa.
Phoebe being not intelligent or Helena being realistic implies that Helena is healthy.
If Helena is not rare and Amery is beige, then Clifford is not healthy. | Casper is not rare. | entailment |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.