premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
---|---|---|
Reginald is not tired.
Chrysta is not tired.
Reginald is petite.
Angus is not difficult.
Sterling is not difficult.
Chrysta is courageous.
Chrysta is not petite.
Marlon is not courageous.
Marlon is difficult.
Marlon is tired.
Sloane is not difficult.
Sloane is petite.If there is someone who is both petite and not tired, then Sloane is difficult.
If Reginald is difficult, then Sterling is not tired.
Marlon is not tired if and only if Sloane is courageous.
If there is someone who is not tired, then Angus is petite and Chrysta is courageous.
If someone is courageous and not unfair, then he is both petite and not tired, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not tired or unfair is always not difficult.
If Reginald is not tired, then Sterling is petite, and vice versa.
Someone who is tired is always both not tired and petite.
Someone being unfair is equivalent to being not tired.
If Chrysta is tired and Marlon is petite, then Sloane is not tired.
If someone is both tired and tired, then he is difficult.
It can be concluded that Angus is courageous once knowing that Kurt is not unfair. | Marlon is unfair. | self_contradiction |
Reginald is not tired.
Chrysta is not tired.
Reginald is petite.
Angus is not difficult.
Sterling is not difficult.
Chrysta is courageous.
Chrysta is not petite.
Marlon is not courageous.
Marlon is difficult.
Marlon is tired.
Sloane is not difficult.
Sloane is petite.If there is someone who is both petite and not tired, then Sloane is difficult.
If Reginald is difficult, then Sterling is not tired.
Marlon is not tired if and only if Sloane is courageous.
If there is someone who is not tired, then Angus is petite and Chrysta is courageous.
If someone is courageous and not unfair, then he is both petite and not tired, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not tired or unfair is always not difficult.
If Reginald is not tired, then Sterling is petite, and vice versa.
Someone who is tired is always both not tired and petite.
Someone being unfair is equivalent to being not tired.
If Chrysta is tired and Marlon is petite, then Sloane is not tired.
If someone is both tired and tired, then he is difficult.
It can be concluded that Angus is courageous once knowing that Kurt is not unfair. | Sterling is courageous. | neutral |
Reginald is not tired.
Chrysta is not tired.
Reginald is petite.
Angus is not difficult.
Sterling is not difficult.
Chrysta is courageous.
Chrysta is not petite.
Marlon is not courageous.
Marlon is difficult.
Marlon is tired.
Sloane is not difficult.
Sloane is petite.If there is someone who is both petite and not tired, then Sloane is difficult.
If Reginald is difficult, then Sterling is not tired.
Marlon is not tired if and only if Sloane is courageous.
If there is someone who is not tired, then Angus is petite and Chrysta is courageous.
If someone is courageous and not unfair, then he is both petite and not tired, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not tired or unfair is always not difficult.
If Reginald is not tired, then Sterling is petite, and vice versa.
Someone who is tired is always both not tired and petite.
Someone being unfair is equivalent to being not tired.
If Chrysta is tired and Marlon is petite, then Sloane is not tired.
If someone is both tired and tired, then he is difficult.
It can be concluded that Angus is courageous once knowing that Kurt is not unfair. | Chrysta is difficult. | contradiction |
Reginald is not tired.
Chrysta is not tired.
Reginald is petite.
Angus is not difficult.
Sterling is not difficult.
Chrysta is courageous.
Chrysta is not petite.
Marlon is not courageous.
Marlon is difficult.
Marlon is tired.
Sloane is not difficult.
Sloane is petite.If there is someone who is both petite and not tired, then Sloane is difficult.
If Reginald is difficult, then Sterling is not tired.
Marlon is not tired if and only if Sloane is courageous.
If there is someone who is not tired, then Angus is petite and Chrysta is courageous.
If someone is courageous and not unfair, then he is both petite and not tired, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not tired or unfair is always not difficult.
If Reginald is not tired, then Sterling is petite, and vice versa.
Someone who is tired is always both not tired and petite.
Someone being unfair is equivalent to being not tired.
If Chrysta is tired and Marlon is petite, then Sloane is not tired.
If someone is both tired and tired, then he is difficult.
It can be concluded that Angus is courageous once knowing that Kurt is not unfair. | Angus is courageous. | neutral |
Reginald is not tired.
Chrysta is not tired.
Reginald is petite.
Angus is not difficult.
Sterling is not difficult.
Chrysta is courageous.
Chrysta is not petite.
Marlon is not courageous.
Marlon is difficult.
Marlon is tired.
Sloane is not difficult.
Sloane is petite.If there is someone who is both petite and not tired, then Sloane is difficult.
If Reginald is difficult, then Sterling is not tired.
Marlon is not tired if and only if Sloane is courageous.
If there is someone who is not tired, then Angus is petite and Chrysta is courageous.
If someone is courageous and not unfair, then he is both petite and not tired, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not tired or unfair is always not difficult.
If Reginald is not tired, then Sterling is petite, and vice versa.
Someone who is tired is always both not tired and petite.
Someone being unfair is equivalent to being not tired.
If Chrysta is tired and Marlon is petite, then Sloane is not tired.
If someone is both tired and tired, then he is difficult.
It can be concluded that Angus is courageous once knowing that Kurt is not unfair. | Marlon is not courageous. | self_contradiction |
Reginald is not tired.
Chrysta is not tired.
Reginald is petite.
Angus is not difficult.
Sterling is not difficult.
Chrysta is courageous.
Chrysta is not petite.
Marlon is not courageous.
Marlon is difficult.
Marlon is tired.
Sloane is not difficult.
Sloane is petite.If there is someone who is both petite and not tired, then Sloane is difficult.
If Reginald is difficult, then Sterling is not tired.
Marlon is not tired if and only if Sloane is courageous.
If there is someone who is not tired, then Angus is petite and Chrysta is courageous.
If someone is courageous and not unfair, then he is both petite and not tired, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not tired or unfair is always not difficult.
If Reginald is not tired, then Sterling is petite, and vice versa.
Someone who is tired is always both not tired and petite.
Someone being unfair is equivalent to being not tired.
If Chrysta is tired and Marlon is petite, then Sloane is not tired.
If someone is both tired and tired, then he is difficult.
It can be concluded that Angus is courageous once knowing that Kurt is not unfair. | Reginald is courageous. | entailment |
Reginald is not tired.
Chrysta is not tired.
Reginald is petite.
Angus is not difficult.
Sterling is not difficult.
Chrysta is courageous.
Chrysta is not petite.
Marlon is not courageous.
Marlon is difficult.
Marlon is tired.
Sloane is not difficult.
Sloane is petite.If there is someone who is both petite and not tired, then Sloane is difficult.
If Reginald is difficult, then Sterling is not tired.
Marlon is not tired if and only if Sloane is courageous.
If there is someone who is not tired, then Angus is petite and Chrysta is courageous.
If someone is courageous and not unfair, then he is both petite and not tired, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not tired or unfair is always not difficult.
If Reginald is not tired, then Sterling is petite, and vice versa.
Someone who is tired is always both not tired and petite.
Someone being unfair is equivalent to being not tired.
If Chrysta is tired and Marlon is petite, then Sloane is not tired.
If someone is both tired and tired, then he is difficult.
It can be concluded that Angus is courageous once knowing that Kurt is not unfair. | Reginald is not difficult. | entailment |
Reginald is not tired.
Chrysta is not tired.
Reginald is petite.
Angus is not difficult.
Sterling is not difficult.
Chrysta is courageous.
Chrysta is not petite.
Marlon is not courageous.
Marlon is difficult.
Marlon is tired.
Sloane is not difficult.
Sloane is petite.If there is someone who is both petite and not tired, then Sloane is difficult.
If Reginald is difficult, then Sterling is not tired.
Marlon is not tired if and only if Sloane is courageous.
If there is someone who is not tired, then Angus is petite and Chrysta is courageous.
If someone is courageous and not unfair, then he is both petite and not tired, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not tired or unfair is always not difficult.
If Reginald is not tired, then Sterling is petite, and vice versa.
Someone who is tired is always both not tired and petite.
Someone being unfair is equivalent to being not tired.
If Chrysta is tired and Marlon is petite, then Sloane is not tired.
If someone is both tired and tired, then he is difficult.
It can be concluded that Angus is courageous once knowing that Kurt is not unfair. | Marlon is not petite. | contradiction |
Reginald is not tired.
Chrysta is not tired.
Reginald is petite.
Angus is not difficult.
Sterling is not difficult.
Chrysta is courageous.
Chrysta is not petite.
Marlon is not courageous.
Marlon is difficult.
Marlon is tired.
Sloane is not difficult.
Sloane is petite.If there is someone who is both petite and not tired, then Sloane is difficult.
If Reginald is difficult, then Sterling is not tired.
Marlon is not tired if and only if Sloane is courageous.
If there is someone who is not tired, then Angus is petite and Chrysta is courageous.
If someone is courageous and not unfair, then he is both petite and not tired, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not tired or unfair is always not difficult.
If Reginald is not tired, then Sterling is petite, and vice versa.
Someone who is tired is always both not tired and petite.
Someone being unfair is equivalent to being not tired.
If Chrysta is tired and Marlon is petite, then Sloane is not tired.
If someone is both tired and tired, then he is difficult.
It can be concluded that Angus is courageous once knowing that Kurt is not unfair. | Sterling is not difficult. | entailment |
Reginald is not tired.
Chrysta is not tired.
Reginald is petite.
Angus is not difficult.
Sterling is not difficult.
Chrysta is courageous.
Chrysta is not petite.
Marlon is not courageous.
Marlon is difficult.
Marlon is tired.
Sloane is not difficult.
Sloane is petite.If there is someone who is both petite and not tired, then Sloane is difficult.
If Reginald is difficult, then Sterling is not tired.
Marlon is not tired if and only if Sloane is courageous.
If there is someone who is not tired, then Angus is petite and Chrysta is courageous.
If someone is courageous and not unfair, then he is both petite and not tired, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not tired or unfair is always not difficult.
If Reginald is not tired, then Sterling is petite, and vice versa.
Someone who is tired is always both not tired and petite.
Someone being unfair is equivalent to being not tired.
If Chrysta is tired and Marlon is petite, then Sloane is not tired.
If someone is both tired and tired, then he is difficult.
It can be concluded that Angus is courageous once knowing that Kurt is not unfair. | Marlon is tired. | self_contradiction |
Reginald is not tired.
Chrysta is not tired.
Reginald is petite.
Angus is not difficult.
Sterling is not difficult.
Chrysta is courageous.
Chrysta is not petite.
Marlon is not courageous.
Marlon is difficult.
Marlon is tired.
Sloane is not difficult.
Sloane is petite.If there is someone who is both petite and not tired, then Sloane is difficult.
If Reginald is difficult, then Sterling is not tired.
Marlon is not tired if and only if Sloane is courageous.
If there is someone who is not tired, then Angus is petite and Chrysta is courageous.
If someone is courageous and not unfair, then he is both petite and not tired, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not tired or unfair is always not difficult.
If Reginald is not tired, then Sterling is petite, and vice versa.
Someone who is tired is always both not tired and petite.
Someone being unfair is equivalent to being not tired.
If Chrysta is tired and Marlon is petite, then Sloane is not tired.
If someone is both tired and tired, then he is difficult.
It can be concluded that Angus is courageous once knowing that Kurt is not unfair. | Chrysta is petite. | contradiction |
Reginald is not tired.
Chrysta is not tired.
Reginald is petite.
Angus is not difficult.
Sterling is not difficult.
Chrysta is courageous.
Chrysta is not petite.
Marlon is not courageous.
Marlon is difficult.
Marlon is tired.
Sloane is not difficult.
Sloane is petite.If there is someone who is both petite and not tired, then Sloane is difficult.
If Reginald is difficult, then Sterling is not tired.
Marlon is not tired if and only if Sloane is courageous.
If there is someone who is not tired, then Angus is petite and Chrysta is courageous.
If someone is courageous and not unfair, then he is both petite and not tired, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not tired or unfair is always not difficult.
If Reginald is not tired, then Sterling is petite, and vice versa.
Someone who is tired is always both not tired and petite.
Someone being unfair is equivalent to being not tired.
If Chrysta is tired and Marlon is petite, then Sloane is not tired.
If someone is both tired and tired, then he is difficult.
It can be concluded that Angus is courageous once knowing that Kurt is not unfair. | Chrysta is not unfair. | contradiction |
Reginald is not tired.
Chrysta is not tired.
Reginald is petite.
Angus is not difficult.
Sterling is not difficult.
Chrysta is courageous.
Chrysta is not petite.
Marlon is not courageous.
Marlon is difficult.
Marlon is tired.
Sloane is not difficult.
Sloane is petite.If there is someone who is both petite and not tired, then Sloane is difficult.
If Reginald is difficult, then Sterling is not tired.
Marlon is not tired if and only if Sloane is courageous.
If there is someone who is not tired, then Angus is petite and Chrysta is courageous.
If someone is courageous and not unfair, then he is both petite and not tired, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not tired or unfair is always not difficult.
If Reginald is not tired, then Sterling is petite, and vice versa.
Someone who is tired is always both not tired and petite.
Someone being unfair is equivalent to being not tired.
If Chrysta is tired and Marlon is petite, then Sloane is not tired.
If someone is both tired and tired, then he is difficult.
It can be concluded that Angus is courageous once knowing that Kurt is not unfair. | Reginald is not tired. | entailment |
Reginald is not tired.
Chrysta is not tired.
Reginald is petite.
Angus is not difficult.
Sterling is not difficult.
Chrysta is courageous.
Chrysta is not petite.
Marlon is not courageous.
Marlon is difficult.
Marlon is tired.
Sloane is not difficult.
Sloane is petite.If there is someone who is both petite and not tired, then Sloane is difficult.
If Reginald is difficult, then Sterling is not tired.
Marlon is not tired if and only if Sloane is courageous.
If there is someone who is not tired, then Angus is petite and Chrysta is courageous.
If someone is courageous and not unfair, then he is both petite and not tired, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not tired or unfair is always not difficult.
If Reginald is not tired, then Sterling is petite, and vice versa.
Someone who is tired is always both not tired and petite.
Someone being unfair is equivalent to being not tired.
If Chrysta is tired and Marlon is petite, then Sloane is not tired.
If someone is both tired and tired, then he is difficult.
It can be concluded that Angus is courageous once knowing that Kurt is not unfair. | Chrysta is tired. | contradiction |
Reginald is not tired.
Chrysta is not tired.
Reginald is petite.
Angus is not difficult.
Sterling is not difficult.
Chrysta is courageous.
Chrysta is not petite.
Marlon is not courageous.
Marlon is difficult.
Marlon is tired.
Sloane is not difficult.
Sloane is petite.If there is someone who is both petite and not tired, then Sloane is difficult.
If Reginald is difficult, then Sterling is not tired.
Marlon is not tired if and only if Sloane is courageous.
If there is someone who is not tired, then Angus is petite and Chrysta is courageous.
If someone is courageous and not unfair, then he is both petite and not tired, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not tired or unfair is always not difficult.
If Reginald is not tired, then Sterling is petite, and vice versa.
Someone who is tired is always both not tired and petite.
Someone being unfair is equivalent to being not tired.
If Chrysta is tired and Marlon is petite, then Sloane is not tired.
If someone is both tired and tired, then he is difficult.
It can be concluded that Angus is courageous once knowing that Kurt is not unfair. | Sterling is not tired. | neutral |
Reginald is not tired.
Chrysta is not tired.
Reginald is petite.
Angus is not difficult.
Sterling is not difficult.
Chrysta is courageous.
Chrysta is not petite.
Marlon is not courageous.
Marlon is difficult.
Marlon is tired.
Sloane is not difficult.
Sloane is petite.If there is someone who is both petite and not tired, then Sloane is difficult.
If Reginald is difficult, then Sterling is not tired.
Marlon is not tired if and only if Sloane is courageous.
If there is someone who is not tired, then Angus is petite and Chrysta is courageous.
If someone is courageous and not unfair, then he is both petite and not tired, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not tired or unfair is always not difficult.
If Reginald is not tired, then Sterling is petite, and vice versa.
Someone who is tired is always both not tired and petite.
Someone being unfair is equivalent to being not tired.
If Chrysta is tired and Marlon is petite, then Sloane is not tired.
If someone is both tired and tired, then he is difficult.
It can be concluded that Angus is courageous once knowing that Kurt is not unfair. | Marlon is not unfair. | self_contradiction |
Reginald is not tired.
Chrysta is not tired.
Reginald is petite.
Angus is not difficult.
Sterling is not difficult.
Chrysta is courageous.
Chrysta is not petite.
Marlon is not courageous.
Marlon is difficult.
Marlon is tired.
Sloane is not difficult.
Sloane is petite.If there is someone who is both petite and not tired, then Sloane is difficult.
If Reginald is difficult, then Sterling is not tired.
Marlon is not tired if and only if Sloane is courageous.
If there is someone who is not tired, then Angus is petite and Chrysta is courageous.
If someone is courageous and not unfair, then he is both petite and not tired, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not tired or unfair is always not difficult.
If Reginald is not tired, then Sterling is petite, and vice versa.
Someone who is tired is always both not tired and petite.
Someone being unfair is equivalent to being not tired.
If Chrysta is tired and Marlon is petite, then Sloane is not tired.
If someone is both tired and tired, then he is difficult.
It can be concluded that Angus is courageous once knowing that Kurt is not unfair. | Sloane is not unfair. | neutral |
Reginald is not tired.
Chrysta is not tired.
Reginald is petite.
Angus is not difficult.
Sterling is not difficult.
Chrysta is courageous.
Chrysta is not petite.
Marlon is not courageous.
Marlon is difficult.
Marlon is tired.
Sloane is not difficult.
Sloane is petite.If there is someone who is both petite and not tired, then Sloane is difficult.
If Reginald is difficult, then Sterling is not tired.
Marlon is not tired if and only if Sloane is courageous.
If there is someone who is not tired, then Angus is petite and Chrysta is courageous.
If someone is courageous and not unfair, then he is both petite and not tired, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not tired or unfair is always not difficult.
If Reginald is not tired, then Sterling is petite, and vice versa.
Someone who is tired is always both not tired and petite.
Someone being unfair is equivalent to being not tired.
If Chrysta is tired and Marlon is petite, then Sloane is not tired.
If someone is both tired and tired, then he is difficult.
It can be concluded that Angus is courageous once knowing that Kurt is not unfair. | Chrysta is courageous. | entailment |
Reginald is not tired.
Chrysta is not tired.
Reginald is petite.
Angus is not difficult.
Sterling is not difficult.
Chrysta is courageous.
Chrysta is not petite.
Marlon is not courageous.
Marlon is difficult.
Marlon is tired.
Sloane is not difficult.
Sloane is petite.If there is someone who is both petite and not tired, then Sloane is difficult.
If Reginald is difficult, then Sterling is not tired.
Marlon is not tired if and only if Sloane is courageous.
If there is someone who is not tired, then Angus is petite and Chrysta is courageous.
If someone is courageous and not unfair, then he is both petite and not tired, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not tired or unfair is always not difficult.
If Reginald is not tired, then Sterling is petite, and vice versa.
Someone who is tired is always both not tired and petite.
Someone being unfair is equivalent to being not tired.
If Chrysta is tired and Marlon is petite, then Sloane is not tired.
If someone is both tired and tired, then he is difficult.
It can be concluded that Angus is courageous once knowing that Kurt is not unfair. | Marlon is difficult. | self_contradiction |
Reginald is not tired.
Chrysta is not tired.
Reginald is petite.
Angus is not difficult.
Sterling is not difficult.
Chrysta is courageous.
Chrysta is not petite.
Marlon is not courageous.
Marlon is difficult.
Marlon is tired.
Sloane is not difficult.
Sloane is petite.If there is someone who is both petite and not tired, then Sloane is difficult.
If Reginald is difficult, then Sterling is not tired.
Marlon is not tired if and only if Sloane is courageous.
If there is someone who is not tired, then Angus is petite and Chrysta is courageous.
If someone is courageous and not unfair, then he is both petite and not tired, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not tired or unfair is always not difficult.
If Reginald is not tired, then Sterling is petite, and vice versa.
Someone who is tired is always both not tired and petite.
Someone being unfair is equivalent to being not tired.
If Chrysta is tired and Marlon is petite, then Sloane is not tired.
If someone is both tired and tired, then he is difficult.
It can be concluded that Angus is courageous once knowing that Kurt is not unfair. | Kurt is tired. | neutral |
Avery is not sore.
Ted is tame.
Heath is not quaint.
Maddox is sore.
Maddox is not foolish.
Leith is not hungry.
Jerry is not foolish.
Ted is not embarrassed.
Avery is not hungry.
Leith is tame.
Ted is not sore.
Ted is not hungry.If Ted is hungry, then Leith is quaint and Heath is not embarrassed, and vice versa.
If someone is not quaint, then he is tame, and vice versa.
Avery is not foolish if and only if Tony is tame.
Maddox being not embarrassed is equivalent to Jerry being sore.
Someone is not tame if and only if he is not foolish.
If someone is embarrassed and tame, then he is hungry, and vice versa.
Ted being embarrassed implies that Heath is quaint and Jerry is sore.
Maddox being sore implies that Leith is not hungry and Leith is not foolish.
Someone being both not embarrassed and not quaint is equivalent to being foolish.
If there is someone who is both not foolish and hungry, then Maddox is sore.
Leith is not hungry if and only if Jerry is foolish and Ted is not quaint.
If Jerry is quaint, then Jerry is not tame and Ted is not hungry, and vice versa. | Leith is not foolish. | entailment |
Avery is not sore.
Ted is tame.
Heath is not quaint.
Maddox is sore.
Maddox is not foolish.
Leith is not hungry.
Jerry is not foolish.
Ted is not embarrassed.
Avery is not hungry.
Leith is tame.
Ted is not sore.
Ted is not hungry.If Ted is hungry, then Leith is quaint and Heath is not embarrassed, and vice versa.
If someone is not quaint, then he is tame, and vice versa.
Avery is not foolish if and only if Tony is tame.
Maddox being not embarrassed is equivalent to Jerry being sore.
Someone is not tame if and only if he is not foolish.
If someone is embarrassed and tame, then he is hungry, and vice versa.
Ted being embarrassed implies that Heath is quaint and Jerry is sore.
Maddox being sore implies that Leith is not hungry and Leith is not foolish.
Someone being both not embarrassed and not quaint is equivalent to being foolish.
If there is someone who is both not foolish and hungry, then Maddox is sore.
Leith is not hungry if and only if Jerry is foolish and Ted is not quaint.
If Jerry is quaint, then Jerry is not tame and Ted is not hungry, and vice versa. | Jerry is quaint. | self_contradiction |
Avery is not sore.
Ted is tame.
Heath is not quaint.
Maddox is sore.
Maddox is not foolish.
Leith is not hungry.
Jerry is not foolish.
Ted is not embarrassed.
Avery is not hungry.
Leith is tame.
Ted is not sore.
Ted is not hungry.If Ted is hungry, then Leith is quaint and Heath is not embarrassed, and vice versa.
If someone is not quaint, then he is tame, and vice versa.
Avery is not foolish if and only if Tony is tame.
Maddox being not embarrassed is equivalent to Jerry being sore.
Someone is not tame if and only if he is not foolish.
If someone is embarrassed and tame, then he is hungry, and vice versa.
Ted being embarrassed implies that Heath is quaint and Jerry is sore.
Maddox being sore implies that Leith is not hungry and Leith is not foolish.
Someone being both not embarrassed and not quaint is equivalent to being foolish.
If there is someone who is both not foolish and hungry, then Maddox is sore.
Leith is not hungry if and only if Jerry is foolish and Ted is not quaint.
If Jerry is quaint, then Jerry is not tame and Ted is not hungry, and vice versa. | Maddox is tame. | contradiction |
Avery is not sore.
Ted is tame.
Heath is not quaint.
Maddox is sore.
Maddox is not foolish.
Leith is not hungry.
Jerry is not foolish.
Ted is not embarrassed.
Avery is not hungry.
Leith is tame.
Ted is not sore.
Ted is not hungry.If Ted is hungry, then Leith is quaint and Heath is not embarrassed, and vice versa.
If someone is not quaint, then he is tame, and vice versa.
Avery is not foolish if and only if Tony is tame.
Maddox being not embarrassed is equivalent to Jerry being sore.
Someone is not tame if and only if he is not foolish.
If someone is embarrassed and tame, then he is hungry, and vice versa.
Ted being embarrassed implies that Heath is quaint and Jerry is sore.
Maddox being sore implies that Leith is not hungry and Leith is not foolish.
Someone being both not embarrassed and not quaint is equivalent to being foolish.
If there is someone who is both not foolish and hungry, then Maddox is sore.
Leith is not hungry if and only if Jerry is foolish and Ted is not quaint.
If Jerry is quaint, then Jerry is not tame and Ted is not hungry, and vice versa. | Avery is hungry. | contradiction |
Avery is not sore.
Ted is tame.
Heath is not quaint.
Maddox is sore.
Maddox is not foolish.
Leith is not hungry.
Jerry is not foolish.
Ted is not embarrassed.
Avery is not hungry.
Leith is tame.
Ted is not sore.
Ted is not hungry.If Ted is hungry, then Leith is quaint and Heath is not embarrassed, and vice versa.
If someone is not quaint, then he is tame, and vice versa.
Avery is not foolish if and only if Tony is tame.
Maddox being not embarrassed is equivalent to Jerry being sore.
Someone is not tame if and only if he is not foolish.
If someone is embarrassed and tame, then he is hungry, and vice versa.
Ted being embarrassed implies that Heath is quaint and Jerry is sore.
Maddox being sore implies that Leith is not hungry and Leith is not foolish.
Someone being both not embarrassed and not quaint is equivalent to being foolish.
If there is someone who is both not foolish and hungry, then Maddox is sore.
Leith is not hungry if and only if Jerry is foolish and Ted is not quaint.
If Jerry is quaint, then Jerry is not tame and Ted is not hungry, and vice versa. | Ted is tame. | entailment |
Avery is not sore.
Ted is tame.
Heath is not quaint.
Maddox is sore.
Maddox is not foolish.
Leith is not hungry.
Jerry is not foolish.
Ted is not embarrassed.
Avery is not hungry.
Leith is tame.
Ted is not sore.
Ted is not hungry.If Ted is hungry, then Leith is quaint and Heath is not embarrassed, and vice versa.
If someone is not quaint, then he is tame, and vice versa.
Avery is not foolish if and only if Tony is tame.
Maddox being not embarrassed is equivalent to Jerry being sore.
Someone is not tame if and only if he is not foolish.
If someone is embarrassed and tame, then he is hungry, and vice versa.
Ted being embarrassed implies that Heath is quaint and Jerry is sore.
Maddox being sore implies that Leith is not hungry and Leith is not foolish.
Someone being both not embarrassed and not quaint is equivalent to being foolish.
If there is someone who is both not foolish and hungry, then Maddox is sore.
Leith is not hungry if and only if Jerry is foolish and Ted is not quaint.
If Jerry is quaint, then Jerry is not tame and Ted is not hungry, and vice versa. | Ted is not tame. | contradiction |
Avery is not sore.
Ted is tame.
Heath is not quaint.
Maddox is sore.
Maddox is not foolish.
Leith is not hungry.
Jerry is not foolish.
Ted is not embarrassed.
Avery is not hungry.
Leith is tame.
Ted is not sore.
Ted is not hungry.If Ted is hungry, then Leith is quaint and Heath is not embarrassed, and vice versa.
If someone is not quaint, then he is tame, and vice versa.
Avery is not foolish if and only if Tony is tame.
Maddox being not embarrassed is equivalent to Jerry being sore.
Someone is not tame if and only if he is not foolish.
If someone is embarrassed and tame, then he is hungry, and vice versa.
Ted being embarrassed implies that Heath is quaint and Jerry is sore.
Maddox being sore implies that Leith is not hungry and Leith is not foolish.
Someone being both not embarrassed and not quaint is equivalent to being foolish.
If there is someone who is both not foolish and hungry, then Maddox is sore.
Leith is not hungry if and only if Jerry is foolish and Ted is not quaint.
If Jerry is quaint, then Jerry is not tame and Ted is not hungry, and vice versa. | Tony is foolish. | neutral |
Avery is not sore.
Ted is tame.
Heath is not quaint.
Maddox is sore.
Maddox is not foolish.
Leith is not hungry.
Jerry is not foolish.
Ted is not embarrassed.
Avery is not hungry.
Leith is tame.
Ted is not sore.
Ted is not hungry.If Ted is hungry, then Leith is quaint and Heath is not embarrassed, and vice versa.
If someone is not quaint, then he is tame, and vice versa.
Avery is not foolish if and only if Tony is tame.
Maddox being not embarrassed is equivalent to Jerry being sore.
Someone is not tame if and only if he is not foolish.
If someone is embarrassed and tame, then he is hungry, and vice versa.
Ted being embarrassed implies that Heath is quaint and Jerry is sore.
Maddox being sore implies that Leith is not hungry and Leith is not foolish.
Someone being both not embarrassed and not quaint is equivalent to being foolish.
If there is someone who is both not foolish and hungry, then Maddox is sore.
Leith is not hungry if and only if Jerry is foolish and Ted is not quaint.
If Jerry is quaint, then Jerry is not tame and Ted is not hungry, and vice versa. | Leith is not tame. | self_contradiction |
Avery is not sore.
Ted is tame.
Heath is not quaint.
Maddox is sore.
Maddox is not foolish.
Leith is not hungry.
Jerry is not foolish.
Ted is not embarrassed.
Avery is not hungry.
Leith is tame.
Ted is not sore.
Ted is not hungry.If Ted is hungry, then Leith is quaint and Heath is not embarrassed, and vice versa.
If someone is not quaint, then he is tame, and vice versa.
Avery is not foolish if and only if Tony is tame.
Maddox being not embarrassed is equivalent to Jerry being sore.
Someone is not tame if and only if he is not foolish.
If someone is embarrassed and tame, then he is hungry, and vice versa.
Ted being embarrassed implies that Heath is quaint and Jerry is sore.
Maddox being sore implies that Leith is not hungry and Leith is not foolish.
Someone being both not embarrassed and not quaint is equivalent to being foolish.
If there is someone who is both not foolish and hungry, then Maddox is sore.
Leith is not hungry if and only if Jerry is foolish and Ted is not quaint.
If Jerry is quaint, then Jerry is not tame and Ted is not hungry, and vice versa. | Jerry is embarrassed. | contradiction |
Avery is not sore.
Ted is tame.
Heath is not quaint.
Maddox is sore.
Maddox is not foolish.
Leith is not hungry.
Jerry is not foolish.
Ted is not embarrassed.
Avery is not hungry.
Leith is tame.
Ted is not sore.
Ted is not hungry.If Ted is hungry, then Leith is quaint and Heath is not embarrassed, and vice versa.
If someone is not quaint, then he is tame, and vice versa.
Avery is not foolish if and only if Tony is tame.
Maddox being not embarrassed is equivalent to Jerry being sore.
Someone is not tame if and only if he is not foolish.
If someone is embarrassed and tame, then he is hungry, and vice versa.
Ted being embarrassed implies that Heath is quaint and Jerry is sore.
Maddox being sore implies that Leith is not hungry and Leith is not foolish.
Someone being both not embarrassed and not quaint is equivalent to being foolish.
If there is someone who is both not foolish and hungry, then Maddox is sore.
Leith is not hungry if and only if Jerry is foolish and Ted is not quaint.
If Jerry is quaint, then Jerry is not tame and Ted is not hungry, and vice versa. | Avery is quaint. | neutral |
Avery is not sore.
Ted is tame.
Heath is not quaint.
Maddox is sore.
Maddox is not foolish.
Leith is not hungry.
Jerry is not foolish.
Ted is not embarrassed.
Avery is not hungry.
Leith is tame.
Ted is not sore.
Ted is not hungry.If Ted is hungry, then Leith is quaint and Heath is not embarrassed, and vice versa.
If someone is not quaint, then he is tame, and vice versa.
Avery is not foolish if and only if Tony is tame.
Maddox being not embarrassed is equivalent to Jerry being sore.
Someone is not tame if and only if he is not foolish.
If someone is embarrassed and tame, then he is hungry, and vice versa.
Ted being embarrassed implies that Heath is quaint and Jerry is sore.
Maddox being sore implies that Leith is not hungry and Leith is not foolish.
Someone being both not embarrassed and not quaint is equivalent to being foolish.
If there is someone who is both not foolish and hungry, then Maddox is sore.
Leith is not hungry if and only if Jerry is foolish and Ted is not quaint.
If Jerry is quaint, then Jerry is not tame and Ted is not hungry, and vice versa. | Maddox is not foolish. | entailment |
Avery is not sore.
Ted is tame.
Heath is not quaint.
Maddox is sore.
Maddox is not foolish.
Leith is not hungry.
Jerry is not foolish.
Ted is not embarrassed.
Avery is not hungry.
Leith is tame.
Ted is not sore.
Ted is not hungry.If Ted is hungry, then Leith is quaint and Heath is not embarrassed, and vice versa.
If someone is not quaint, then he is tame, and vice versa.
Avery is not foolish if and only if Tony is tame.
Maddox being not embarrassed is equivalent to Jerry being sore.
Someone is not tame if and only if he is not foolish.
If someone is embarrassed and tame, then he is hungry, and vice versa.
Ted being embarrassed implies that Heath is quaint and Jerry is sore.
Maddox being sore implies that Leith is not hungry and Leith is not foolish.
Someone being both not embarrassed and not quaint is equivalent to being foolish.
If there is someone who is both not foolish and hungry, then Maddox is sore.
Leith is not hungry if and only if Jerry is foolish and Ted is not quaint.
If Jerry is quaint, then Jerry is not tame and Ted is not hungry, and vice versa. | Maddox is sore. | entailment |
Avery is not sore.
Ted is tame.
Heath is not quaint.
Maddox is sore.
Maddox is not foolish.
Leith is not hungry.
Jerry is not foolish.
Ted is not embarrassed.
Avery is not hungry.
Leith is tame.
Ted is not sore.
Ted is not hungry.If Ted is hungry, then Leith is quaint and Heath is not embarrassed, and vice versa.
If someone is not quaint, then he is tame, and vice versa.
Avery is not foolish if and only if Tony is tame.
Maddox being not embarrassed is equivalent to Jerry being sore.
Someone is not tame if and only if he is not foolish.
If someone is embarrassed and tame, then he is hungry, and vice versa.
Ted being embarrassed implies that Heath is quaint and Jerry is sore.
Maddox being sore implies that Leith is not hungry and Leith is not foolish.
Someone being both not embarrassed and not quaint is equivalent to being foolish.
If there is someone who is both not foolish and hungry, then Maddox is sore.
Leith is not hungry if and only if Jerry is foolish and Ted is not quaint.
If Jerry is quaint, then Jerry is not tame and Ted is not hungry, and vice versa. | Jerry is not quaint. | self_contradiction |
Avery is not sore.
Ted is tame.
Heath is not quaint.
Maddox is sore.
Maddox is not foolish.
Leith is not hungry.
Jerry is not foolish.
Ted is not embarrassed.
Avery is not hungry.
Leith is tame.
Ted is not sore.
Ted is not hungry.If Ted is hungry, then Leith is quaint and Heath is not embarrassed, and vice versa.
If someone is not quaint, then he is tame, and vice versa.
Avery is not foolish if and only if Tony is tame.
Maddox being not embarrassed is equivalent to Jerry being sore.
Someone is not tame if and only if he is not foolish.
If someone is embarrassed and tame, then he is hungry, and vice versa.
Ted being embarrassed implies that Heath is quaint and Jerry is sore.
Maddox being sore implies that Leith is not hungry and Leith is not foolish.
Someone being both not embarrassed and not quaint is equivalent to being foolish.
If there is someone who is both not foolish and hungry, then Maddox is sore.
Leith is not hungry if and only if Jerry is foolish and Ted is not quaint.
If Jerry is quaint, then Jerry is not tame and Ted is not hungry, and vice versa. | Jerry is tame. | self_contradiction |
Avery is not sore.
Ted is tame.
Heath is not quaint.
Maddox is sore.
Maddox is not foolish.
Leith is not hungry.
Jerry is not foolish.
Ted is not embarrassed.
Avery is not hungry.
Leith is tame.
Ted is not sore.
Ted is not hungry.If Ted is hungry, then Leith is quaint and Heath is not embarrassed, and vice versa.
If someone is not quaint, then he is tame, and vice versa.
Avery is not foolish if and only if Tony is tame.
Maddox being not embarrassed is equivalent to Jerry being sore.
Someone is not tame if and only if he is not foolish.
If someone is embarrassed and tame, then he is hungry, and vice versa.
Ted being embarrassed implies that Heath is quaint and Jerry is sore.
Maddox being sore implies that Leith is not hungry and Leith is not foolish.
Someone being both not embarrassed and not quaint is equivalent to being foolish.
If there is someone who is both not foolish and hungry, then Maddox is sore.
Leith is not hungry if and only if Jerry is foolish and Ted is not quaint.
If Jerry is quaint, then Jerry is not tame and Ted is not hungry, and vice versa. | Maddox is not sore. | contradiction |
Avery is not sore.
Ted is tame.
Heath is not quaint.
Maddox is sore.
Maddox is not foolish.
Leith is not hungry.
Jerry is not foolish.
Ted is not embarrassed.
Avery is not hungry.
Leith is tame.
Ted is not sore.
Ted is not hungry.If Ted is hungry, then Leith is quaint and Heath is not embarrassed, and vice versa.
If someone is not quaint, then he is tame, and vice versa.
Avery is not foolish if and only if Tony is tame.
Maddox being not embarrassed is equivalent to Jerry being sore.
Someone is not tame if and only if he is not foolish.
If someone is embarrassed and tame, then he is hungry, and vice versa.
Ted being embarrassed implies that Heath is quaint and Jerry is sore.
Maddox being sore implies that Leith is not hungry and Leith is not foolish.
Someone being both not embarrassed and not quaint is equivalent to being foolish.
If there is someone who is both not foolish and hungry, then Maddox is sore.
Leith is not hungry if and only if Jerry is foolish and Ted is not quaint.
If Jerry is quaint, then Jerry is not tame and Ted is not hungry, and vice versa. | Heath is foolish. | neutral |
Avery is not sore.
Ted is tame.
Heath is not quaint.
Maddox is sore.
Maddox is not foolish.
Leith is not hungry.
Jerry is not foolish.
Ted is not embarrassed.
Avery is not hungry.
Leith is tame.
Ted is not sore.
Ted is not hungry.If Ted is hungry, then Leith is quaint and Heath is not embarrassed, and vice versa.
If someone is not quaint, then he is tame, and vice versa.
Avery is not foolish if and only if Tony is tame.
Maddox being not embarrassed is equivalent to Jerry being sore.
Someone is not tame if and only if he is not foolish.
If someone is embarrassed and tame, then he is hungry, and vice versa.
Ted being embarrassed implies that Heath is quaint and Jerry is sore.
Maddox being sore implies that Leith is not hungry and Leith is not foolish.
Someone being both not embarrassed and not quaint is equivalent to being foolish.
If there is someone who is both not foolish and hungry, then Maddox is sore.
Leith is not hungry if and only if Jerry is foolish and Ted is not quaint.
If Jerry is quaint, then Jerry is not tame and Ted is not hungry, and vice versa. | Heath is not quaint. | entailment |
Avery is not sore.
Ted is tame.
Heath is not quaint.
Maddox is sore.
Maddox is not foolish.
Leith is not hungry.
Jerry is not foolish.
Ted is not embarrassed.
Avery is not hungry.
Leith is tame.
Ted is not sore.
Ted is not hungry.If Ted is hungry, then Leith is quaint and Heath is not embarrassed, and vice versa.
If someone is not quaint, then he is tame, and vice versa.
Avery is not foolish if and only if Tony is tame.
Maddox being not embarrassed is equivalent to Jerry being sore.
Someone is not tame if and only if he is not foolish.
If someone is embarrassed and tame, then he is hungry, and vice versa.
Ted being embarrassed implies that Heath is quaint and Jerry is sore.
Maddox being sore implies that Leith is not hungry and Leith is not foolish.
Someone being both not embarrassed and not quaint is equivalent to being foolish.
If there is someone who is both not foolish and hungry, then Maddox is sore.
Leith is not hungry if and only if Jerry is foolish and Ted is not quaint.
If Jerry is quaint, then Jerry is not tame and Ted is not hungry, and vice versa. | Tony is hungry. | neutral |
Avery is not sore.
Ted is tame.
Heath is not quaint.
Maddox is sore.
Maddox is not foolish.
Leith is not hungry.
Jerry is not foolish.
Ted is not embarrassed.
Avery is not hungry.
Leith is tame.
Ted is not sore.
Ted is not hungry.If Ted is hungry, then Leith is quaint and Heath is not embarrassed, and vice versa.
If someone is not quaint, then he is tame, and vice versa.
Avery is not foolish if and only if Tony is tame.
Maddox being not embarrassed is equivalent to Jerry being sore.
Someone is not tame if and only if he is not foolish.
If someone is embarrassed and tame, then he is hungry, and vice versa.
Ted being embarrassed implies that Heath is quaint and Jerry is sore.
Maddox being sore implies that Leith is not hungry and Leith is not foolish.
Someone being both not embarrassed and not quaint is equivalent to being foolish.
If there is someone who is both not foolish and hungry, then Maddox is sore.
Leith is not hungry if and only if Jerry is foolish and Ted is not quaint.
If Jerry is quaint, then Jerry is not tame and Ted is not hungry, and vice versa. | Jerry is foolish. | self_contradiction |
Avery is not sore.
Ted is tame.
Heath is not quaint.
Maddox is sore.
Maddox is not foolish.
Leith is not hungry.
Jerry is not foolish.
Ted is not embarrassed.
Avery is not hungry.
Leith is tame.
Ted is not sore.
Ted is not hungry.If Ted is hungry, then Leith is quaint and Heath is not embarrassed, and vice versa.
If someone is not quaint, then he is tame, and vice versa.
Avery is not foolish if and only if Tony is tame.
Maddox being not embarrassed is equivalent to Jerry being sore.
Someone is not tame if and only if he is not foolish.
If someone is embarrassed and tame, then he is hungry, and vice versa.
Ted being embarrassed implies that Heath is quaint and Jerry is sore.
Maddox being sore implies that Leith is not hungry and Leith is not foolish.
Someone being both not embarrassed and not quaint is equivalent to being foolish.
If there is someone who is both not foolish and hungry, then Maddox is sore.
Leith is not hungry if and only if Jerry is foolish and Ted is not quaint.
If Jerry is quaint, then Jerry is not tame and Ted is not hungry, and vice versa. | Heath is embarrassed. | neutral |
Chad is not existing.
Hunter is funny.
Debra is warm-hearted.
Debra is not panicky.
Calvin is warm-hearted.
Calvin is not existing.
Brice is not white.
Brice is not funny.
Quillan is not funny.
Hunter is existing.
Cuthbert is tired.
Hunter is white.Someone who is warm-hearted is always not funny.
If someone is existing and not tired, then he is not panicky, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either not warm-hearted or white, he is funny and not existing.
If Quillan is existing or Debra is funny, then Quillan is warm-hearted.
Hunter being warm-hearted implies that Brice is existing and Hunter is panicky.
If there is at least one people who is both not panicky and funny, then Chad is not white.
If there is at least one people who is panicky, then Cuthbert is not warm-hearted and Chad is not white.
Someone who is eithor funny or not existing is always not panicky.
If someone is not tired and funny, then he is not panicky, and vice versa.
Calvin is white if and only if Cuthbert is not existing and Brice is warm-hearted.
If there is at least one people who is panicky, then Calvin is not existing and Brice is warm-hearted.
If someone is white or not funny, then he is tired. | Cuthbert is panicky. | neutral |
Chad is not existing.
Hunter is funny.
Debra is warm-hearted.
Debra is not panicky.
Calvin is warm-hearted.
Calvin is not existing.
Brice is not white.
Brice is not funny.
Quillan is not funny.
Hunter is existing.
Cuthbert is tired.
Hunter is white.Someone who is warm-hearted is always not funny.
If someone is existing and not tired, then he is not panicky, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either not warm-hearted or white, he is funny and not existing.
If Quillan is existing or Debra is funny, then Quillan is warm-hearted.
Hunter being warm-hearted implies that Brice is existing and Hunter is panicky.
If there is at least one people who is both not panicky and funny, then Chad is not white.
If there is at least one people who is panicky, then Cuthbert is not warm-hearted and Chad is not white.
Someone who is eithor funny or not existing is always not panicky.
If someone is not tired and funny, then he is not panicky, and vice versa.
Calvin is white if and only if Cuthbert is not existing and Brice is warm-hearted.
If there is at least one people who is panicky, then Calvin is not existing and Brice is warm-hearted.
If someone is white or not funny, then he is tired. | Quillan is existing. | neutral |
Chad is not existing.
Hunter is funny.
Debra is warm-hearted.
Debra is not panicky.
Calvin is warm-hearted.
Calvin is not existing.
Brice is not white.
Brice is not funny.
Quillan is not funny.
Hunter is existing.
Cuthbert is tired.
Hunter is white.Someone who is warm-hearted is always not funny.
If someone is existing and not tired, then he is not panicky, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either not warm-hearted or white, he is funny and not existing.
If Quillan is existing or Debra is funny, then Quillan is warm-hearted.
Hunter being warm-hearted implies that Brice is existing and Hunter is panicky.
If there is at least one people who is both not panicky and funny, then Chad is not white.
If there is at least one people who is panicky, then Cuthbert is not warm-hearted and Chad is not white.
Someone who is eithor funny or not existing is always not panicky.
If someone is not tired and funny, then he is not panicky, and vice versa.
Calvin is white if and only if Cuthbert is not existing and Brice is warm-hearted.
If there is at least one people who is panicky, then Calvin is not existing and Brice is warm-hearted.
If someone is white or not funny, then he is tired. | Brice is not tired. | contradiction |
Chad is not existing.
Hunter is funny.
Debra is warm-hearted.
Debra is not panicky.
Calvin is warm-hearted.
Calvin is not existing.
Brice is not white.
Brice is not funny.
Quillan is not funny.
Hunter is existing.
Cuthbert is tired.
Hunter is white.Someone who is warm-hearted is always not funny.
If someone is existing and not tired, then he is not panicky, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either not warm-hearted or white, he is funny and not existing.
If Quillan is existing or Debra is funny, then Quillan is warm-hearted.
Hunter being warm-hearted implies that Brice is existing and Hunter is panicky.
If there is at least one people who is both not panicky and funny, then Chad is not white.
If there is at least one people who is panicky, then Cuthbert is not warm-hearted and Chad is not white.
Someone who is eithor funny or not existing is always not panicky.
If someone is not tired and funny, then he is not panicky, and vice versa.
Calvin is white if and only if Cuthbert is not existing and Brice is warm-hearted.
If there is at least one people who is panicky, then Calvin is not existing and Brice is warm-hearted.
If someone is white or not funny, then he is tired. | Calvin is not tired. | self_contradiction |
Chad is not existing.
Hunter is funny.
Debra is warm-hearted.
Debra is not panicky.
Calvin is warm-hearted.
Calvin is not existing.
Brice is not white.
Brice is not funny.
Quillan is not funny.
Hunter is existing.
Cuthbert is tired.
Hunter is white.Someone who is warm-hearted is always not funny.
If someone is existing and not tired, then he is not panicky, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either not warm-hearted or white, he is funny and not existing.
If Quillan is existing or Debra is funny, then Quillan is warm-hearted.
Hunter being warm-hearted implies that Brice is existing and Hunter is panicky.
If there is at least one people who is both not panicky and funny, then Chad is not white.
If there is at least one people who is panicky, then Cuthbert is not warm-hearted and Chad is not white.
Someone who is eithor funny or not existing is always not panicky.
If someone is not tired and funny, then he is not panicky, and vice versa.
Calvin is white if and only if Cuthbert is not existing and Brice is warm-hearted.
If there is at least one people who is panicky, then Calvin is not existing and Brice is warm-hearted.
If someone is white or not funny, then he is tired. | Calvin is not panicky. | entailment |
Chad is not existing.
Hunter is funny.
Debra is warm-hearted.
Debra is not panicky.
Calvin is warm-hearted.
Calvin is not existing.
Brice is not white.
Brice is not funny.
Quillan is not funny.
Hunter is existing.
Cuthbert is tired.
Hunter is white.Someone who is warm-hearted is always not funny.
If someone is existing and not tired, then he is not panicky, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either not warm-hearted or white, he is funny and not existing.
If Quillan is existing or Debra is funny, then Quillan is warm-hearted.
Hunter being warm-hearted implies that Brice is existing and Hunter is panicky.
If there is at least one people who is both not panicky and funny, then Chad is not white.
If there is at least one people who is panicky, then Cuthbert is not warm-hearted and Chad is not white.
Someone who is eithor funny or not existing is always not panicky.
If someone is not tired and funny, then he is not panicky, and vice versa.
Calvin is white if and only if Cuthbert is not existing and Brice is warm-hearted.
If there is at least one people who is panicky, then Calvin is not existing and Brice is warm-hearted.
If someone is white or not funny, then he is tired. | Calvin is tired. | self_contradiction |
Chad is not existing.
Hunter is funny.
Debra is warm-hearted.
Debra is not panicky.
Calvin is warm-hearted.
Calvin is not existing.
Brice is not white.
Brice is not funny.
Quillan is not funny.
Hunter is existing.
Cuthbert is tired.
Hunter is white.Someone who is warm-hearted is always not funny.
If someone is existing and not tired, then he is not panicky, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either not warm-hearted or white, he is funny and not existing.
If Quillan is existing or Debra is funny, then Quillan is warm-hearted.
Hunter being warm-hearted implies that Brice is existing and Hunter is panicky.
If there is at least one people who is both not panicky and funny, then Chad is not white.
If there is at least one people who is panicky, then Cuthbert is not warm-hearted and Chad is not white.
Someone who is eithor funny or not existing is always not panicky.
If someone is not tired and funny, then he is not panicky, and vice versa.
Calvin is white if and only if Cuthbert is not existing and Brice is warm-hearted.
If there is at least one people who is panicky, then Calvin is not existing and Brice is warm-hearted.
If someone is white or not funny, then he is tired. | Hunter is not white. | contradiction |
Chad is not existing.
Hunter is funny.
Debra is warm-hearted.
Debra is not panicky.
Calvin is warm-hearted.
Calvin is not existing.
Brice is not white.
Brice is not funny.
Quillan is not funny.
Hunter is existing.
Cuthbert is tired.
Hunter is white.Someone who is warm-hearted is always not funny.
If someone is existing and not tired, then he is not panicky, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either not warm-hearted or white, he is funny and not existing.
If Quillan is existing or Debra is funny, then Quillan is warm-hearted.
Hunter being warm-hearted implies that Brice is existing and Hunter is panicky.
If there is at least one people who is both not panicky and funny, then Chad is not white.
If there is at least one people who is panicky, then Cuthbert is not warm-hearted and Chad is not white.
Someone who is eithor funny or not existing is always not panicky.
If someone is not tired and funny, then he is not panicky, and vice versa.
Calvin is white if and only if Cuthbert is not existing and Brice is warm-hearted.
If there is at least one people who is panicky, then Calvin is not existing and Brice is warm-hearted.
If someone is white or not funny, then he is tired. | Debra is not panicky. | entailment |
Chad is not existing.
Hunter is funny.
Debra is warm-hearted.
Debra is not panicky.
Calvin is warm-hearted.
Calvin is not existing.
Brice is not white.
Brice is not funny.
Quillan is not funny.
Hunter is existing.
Cuthbert is tired.
Hunter is white.Someone who is warm-hearted is always not funny.
If someone is existing and not tired, then he is not panicky, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either not warm-hearted or white, he is funny and not existing.
If Quillan is existing or Debra is funny, then Quillan is warm-hearted.
Hunter being warm-hearted implies that Brice is existing and Hunter is panicky.
If there is at least one people who is both not panicky and funny, then Chad is not white.
If there is at least one people who is panicky, then Cuthbert is not warm-hearted and Chad is not white.
Someone who is eithor funny or not existing is always not panicky.
If someone is not tired and funny, then he is not panicky, and vice versa.
Calvin is white if and only if Cuthbert is not existing and Brice is warm-hearted.
If there is at least one people who is panicky, then Calvin is not existing and Brice is warm-hearted.
If someone is white or not funny, then he is tired. | Debra is existing. | entailment |
Chad is not existing.
Hunter is funny.
Debra is warm-hearted.
Debra is not panicky.
Calvin is warm-hearted.
Calvin is not existing.
Brice is not white.
Brice is not funny.
Quillan is not funny.
Hunter is existing.
Cuthbert is tired.
Hunter is white.Someone who is warm-hearted is always not funny.
If someone is existing and not tired, then he is not panicky, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either not warm-hearted or white, he is funny and not existing.
If Quillan is existing or Debra is funny, then Quillan is warm-hearted.
Hunter being warm-hearted implies that Brice is existing and Hunter is panicky.
If there is at least one people who is both not panicky and funny, then Chad is not white.
If there is at least one people who is panicky, then Cuthbert is not warm-hearted and Chad is not white.
Someone who is eithor funny or not existing is always not panicky.
If someone is not tired and funny, then he is not panicky, and vice versa.
Calvin is white if and only if Cuthbert is not existing and Brice is warm-hearted.
If there is at least one people who is panicky, then Calvin is not existing and Brice is warm-hearted.
If someone is white or not funny, then he is tired. | Cuthbert is existing. | neutral |
Chad is not existing.
Hunter is funny.
Debra is warm-hearted.
Debra is not panicky.
Calvin is warm-hearted.
Calvin is not existing.
Brice is not white.
Brice is not funny.
Quillan is not funny.
Hunter is existing.
Cuthbert is tired.
Hunter is white.Someone who is warm-hearted is always not funny.
If someone is existing and not tired, then he is not panicky, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either not warm-hearted or white, he is funny and not existing.
If Quillan is existing or Debra is funny, then Quillan is warm-hearted.
Hunter being warm-hearted implies that Brice is existing and Hunter is panicky.
If there is at least one people who is both not panicky and funny, then Chad is not white.
If there is at least one people who is panicky, then Cuthbert is not warm-hearted and Chad is not white.
Someone who is eithor funny or not existing is always not panicky.
If someone is not tired and funny, then he is not panicky, and vice versa.
Calvin is white if and only if Cuthbert is not existing and Brice is warm-hearted.
If there is at least one people who is panicky, then Calvin is not existing and Brice is warm-hearted.
If someone is white or not funny, then he is tired. | Chad is panicky. | contradiction |
Chad is not existing.
Hunter is funny.
Debra is warm-hearted.
Debra is not panicky.
Calvin is warm-hearted.
Calvin is not existing.
Brice is not white.
Brice is not funny.
Quillan is not funny.
Hunter is existing.
Cuthbert is tired.
Hunter is white.Someone who is warm-hearted is always not funny.
If someone is existing and not tired, then he is not panicky, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either not warm-hearted or white, he is funny and not existing.
If Quillan is existing or Debra is funny, then Quillan is warm-hearted.
Hunter being warm-hearted implies that Brice is existing and Hunter is panicky.
If there is at least one people who is both not panicky and funny, then Chad is not white.
If there is at least one people who is panicky, then Cuthbert is not warm-hearted and Chad is not white.
Someone who is eithor funny or not existing is always not panicky.
If someone is not tired and funny, then he is not panicky, and vice versa.
Calvin is white if and only if Cuthbert is not existing and Brice is warm-hearted.
If there is at least one people who is panicky, then Calvin is not existing and Brice is warm-hearted.
If someone is white or not funny, then he is tired. | Quillan is tired. | entailment |
Chad is not existing.
Hunter is funny.
Debra is warm-hearted.
Debra is not panicky.
Calvin is warm-hearted.
Calvin is not existing.
Brice is not white.
Brice is not funny.
Quillan is not funny.
Hunter is existing.
Cuthbert is tired.
Hunter is white.Someone who is warm-hearted is always not funny.
If someone is existing and not tired, then he is not panicky, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either not warm-hearted or white, he is funny and not existing.
If Quillan is existing or Debra is funny, then Quillan is warm-hearted.
Hunter being warm-hearted implies that Brice is existing and Hunter is panicky.
If there is at least one people who is both not panicky and funny, then Chad is not white.
If there is at least one people who is panicky, then Cuthbert is not warm-hearted and Chad is not white.
Someone who is eithor funny or not existing is always not panicky.
If someone is not tired and funny, then he is not panicky, and vice versa.
Calvin is white if and only if Cuthbert is not existing and Brice is warm-hearted.
If there is at least one people who is panicky, then Calvin is not existing and Brice is warm-hearted.
If someone is white or not funny, then he is tired. | Chad is warm-hearted. | neutral |
Chad is not existing.
Hunter is funny.
Debra is warm-hearted.
Debra is not panicky.
Calvin is warm-hearted.
Calvin is not existing.
Brice is not white.
Brice is not funny.
Quillan is not funny.
Hunter is existing.
Cuthbert is tired.
Hunter is white.Someone who is warm-hearted is always not funny.
If someone is existing and not tired, then he is not panicky, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either not warm-hearted or white, he is funny and not existing.
If Quillan is existing or Debra is funny, then Quillan is warm-hearted.
Hunter being warm-hearted implies that Brice is existing and Hunter is panicky.
If there is at least one people who is both not panicky and funny, then Chad is not white.
If there is at least one people who is panicky, then Cuthbert is not warm-hearted and Chad is not white.
Someone who is eithor funny or not existing is always not panicky.
If someone is not tired and funny, then he is not panicky, and vice versa.
Calvin is white if and only if Cuthbert is not existing and Brice is warm-hearted.
If there is at least one people who is panicky, then Calvin is not existing and Brice is warm-hearted.
If someone is white or not funny, then he is tired. | Hunter is existing. | self_contradiction |
Chad is not existing.
Hunter is funny.
Debra is warm-hearted.
Debra is not panicky.
Calvin is warm-hearted.
Calvin is not existing.
Brice is not white.
Brice is not funny.
Quillan is not funny.
Hunter is existing.
Cuthbert is tired.
Hunter is white.Someone who is warm-hearted is always not funny.
If someone is existing and not tired, then he is not panicky, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either not warm-hearted or white, he is funny and not existing.
If Quillan is existing or Debra is funny, then Quillan is warm-hearted.
Hunter being warm-hearted implies that Brice is existing and Hunter is panicky.
If there is at least one people who is both not panicky and funny, then Chad is not white.
If there is at least one people who is panicky, then Cuthbert is not warm-hearted and Chad is not white.
Someone who is eithor funny or not existing is always not panicky.
If someone is not tired and funny, then he is not panicky, and vice versa.
Calvin is white if and only if Cuthbert is not existing and Brice is warm-hearted.
If there is at least one people who is panicky, then Calvin is not existing and Brice is warm-hearted.
If someone is white or not funny, then he is tired. | Chad is existing. | self_contradiction |
Chad is not existing.
Hunter is funny.
Debra is warm-hearted.
Debra is not panicky.
Calvin is warm-hearted.
Calvin is not existing.
Brice is not white.
Brice is not funny.
Quillan is not funny.
Hunter is existing.
Cuthbert is tired.
Hunter is white.Someone who is warm-hearted is always not funny.
If someone is existing and not tired, then he is not panicky, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either not warm-hearted or white, he is funny and not existing.
If Quillan is existing or Debra is funny, then Quillan is warm-hearted.
Hunter being warm-hearted implies that Brice is existing and Hunter is panicky.
If there is at least one people who is both not panicky and funny, then Chad is not white.
If there is at least one people who is panicky, then Cuthbert is not warm-hearted and Chad is not white.
Someone who is eithor funny or not existing is always not panicky.
If someone is not tired and funny, then he is not panicky, and vice versa.
Calvin is white if and only if Cuthbert is not existing and Brice is warm-hearted.
If there is at least one people who is panicky, then Calvin is not existing and Brice is warm-hearted.
If someone is white or not funny, then he is tired. | Quillan is panicky. | neutral |
Chad is not existing.
Hunter is funny.
Debra is warm-hearted.
Debra is not panicky.
Calvin is warm-hearted.
Calvin is not existing.
Brice is not white.
Brice is not funny.
Quillan is not funny.
Hunter is existing.
Cuthbert is tired.
Hunter is white.Someone who is warm-hearted is always not funny.
If someone is existing and not tired, then he is not panicky, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either not warm-hearted or white, he is funny and not existing.
If Quillan is existing or Debra is funny, then Quillan is warm-hearted.
Hunter being warm-hearted implies that Brice is existing and Hunter is panicky.
If there is at least one people who is both not panicky and funny, then Chad is not white.
If there is at least one people who is panicky, then Cuthbert is not warm-hearted and Chad is not white.
Someone who is eithor funny or not existing is always not panicky.
If someone is not tired and funny, then he is not panicky, and vice versa.
Calvin is white if and only if Cuthbert is not existing and Brice is warm-hearted.
If there is at least one people who is panicky, then Calvin is not existing and Brice is warm-hearted.
If someone is white or not funny, then he is tired. | Calvin is panicky. | contradiction |
Chad is not existing.
Hunter is funny.
Debra is warm-hearted.
Debra is not panicky.
Calvin is warm-hearted.
Calvin is not existing.
Brice is not white.
Brice is not funny.
Quillan is not funny.
Hunter is existing.
Cuthbert is tired.
Hunter is white.Someone who is warm-hearted is always not funny.
If someone is existing and not tired, then he is not panicky, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either not warm-hearted or white, he is funny and not existing.
If Quillan is existing or Debra is funny, then Quillan is warm-hearted.
Hunter being warm-hearted implies that Brice is existing and Hunter is panicky.
If there is at least one people who is both not panicky and funny, then Chad is not white.
If there is at least one people who is panicky, then Cuthbert is not warm-hearted and Chad is not white.
Someone who is eithor funny or not existing is always not panicky.
If someone is not tired and funny, then he is not panicky, and vice versa.
Calvin is white if and only if Cuthbert is not existing and Brice is warm-hearted.
If there is at least one people who is panicky, then Calvin is not existing and Brice is warm-hearted.
If someone is white or not funny, then he is tired. | Quillan is funny. | contradiction |
Chad is not existing.
Hunter is funny.
Debra is warm-hearted.
Debra is not panicky.
Calvin is warm-hearted.
Calvin is not existing.
Brice is not white.
Brice is not funny.
Quillan is not funny.
Hunter is existing.
Cuthbert is tired.
Hunter is white.Someone who is warm-hearted is always not funny.
If someone is existing and not tired, then he is not panicky, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either not warm-hearted or white, he is funny and not existing.
If Quillan is existing or Debra is funny, then Quillan is warm-hearted.
Hunter being warm-hearted implies that Brice is existing and Hunter is panicky.
If there is at least one people who is both not panicky and funny, then Chad is not white.
If there is at least one people who is panicky, then Cuthbert is not warm-hearted and Chad is not white.
Someone who is eithor funny or not existing is always not panicky.
If someone is not tired and funny, then he is not panicky, and vice versa.
Calvin is white if and only if Cuthbert is not existing and Brice is warm-hearted.
If there is at least one people who is panicky, then Calvin is not existing and Brice is warm-hearted.
If someone is white or not funny, then he is tired. | Debra is not funny. | self_contradiction |
Chad is not existing.
Hunter is funny.
Debra is warm-hearted.
Debra is not panicky.
Calvin is warm-hearted.
Calvin is not existing.
Brice is not white.
Brice is not funny.
Quillan is not funny.
Hunter is existing.
Cuthbert is tired.
Hunter is white.Someone who is warm-hearted is always not funny.
If someone is existing and not tired, then he is not panicky, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either not warm-hearted or white, he is funny and not existing.
If Quillan is existing or Debra is funny, then Quillan is warm-hearted.
Hunter being warm-hearted implies that Brice is existing and Hunter is panicky.
If there is at least one people who is both not panicky and funny, then Chad is not white.
If there is at least one people who is panicky, then Cuthbert is not warm-hearted and Chad is not white.
Someone who is eithor funny or not existing is always not panicky.
If someone is not tired and funny, then he is not panicky, and vice versa.
Calvin is white if and only if Cuthbert is not existing and Brice is warm-hearted.
If there is at least one people who is panicky, then Calvin is not existing and Brice is warm-hearted.
If someone is white or not funny, then he is tired. | Chad is funny. | entailment |
Kianna is not silly.
Walter is unhappy.
Amery is disobedient.
Jed is oak.
Clifford is not silly.
Walter is creepy.
Walter is silly.
Roland is not environmental.
Kianna is not unhappy.
Clifford is disobedient.
Jed is not creepy.
Amery is creepy.Clifford being not silly is equivalent to Kianna being creepy and Jed being disobedient.
Amery being not creepy and Amery being not silly are equivalent to Kianna being not disobedient and Roland being not environmental.
It can be concluded that Roland is not environmental and Clifford is disobedient once knowing that Amery is not unhappy.
It can be concluded that Jed is not disobedient once knowing that Amery is creepy or Connell is not silly.
Someone is disobedient and oak if and only if he is not unhappy.
If there is someone who is either creepy or silly, then Clifford is not oak.
If Roland is creepy, then Jed is not silly, and vice versa.
If someone who is not oak is also unhappy, then he is not disobedient.
If there is someone who is not environmental, then Jed is not silly.
If there is someone who is not oak, then Amery is unhappy.
If there is at least one people who is environmental or disobedient, then Kianna is unhappy.
Someone being oak is equivalent to being not creepy. | Walter is not silly. | contradiction |
Kianna is not silly.
Walter is unhappy.
Amery is disobedient.
Jed is oak.
Clifford is not silly.
Walter is creepy.
Walter is silly.
Roland is not environmental.
Kianna is not unhappy.
Clifford is disobedient.
Jed is not creepy.
Amery is creepy.Clifford being not silly is equivalent to Kianna being creepy and Jed being disobedient.
Amery being not creepy and Amery being not silly are equivalent to Kianna being not disobedient and Roland being not environmental.
It can be concluded that Roland is not environmental and Clifford is disobedient once knowing that Amery is not unhappy.
It can be concluded that Jed is not disobedient once knowing that Amery is creepy or Connell is not silly.
Someone is disobedient and oak if and only if he is not unhappy.
If there is someone who is either creepy or silly, then Clifford is not oak.
If Roland is creepy, then Jed is not silly, and vice versa.
If someone who is not oak is also unhappy, then he is not disobedient.
If there is someone who is not environmental, then Jed is not silly.
If there is someone who is not oak, then Amery is unhappy.
If there is at least one people who is environmental or disobedient, then Kianna is unhappy.
Someone being oak is equivalent to being not creepy. | Jed is not creepy. | entailment |
Kianna is not silly.
Walter is unhappy.
Amery is disobedient.
Jed is oak.
Clifford is not silly.
Walter is creepy.
Walter is silly.
Roland is not environmental.
Kianna is not unhappy.
Clifford is disobedient.
Jed is not creepy.
Amery is creepy.Clifford being not silly is equivalent to Kianna being creepy and Jed being disobedient.
Amery being not creepy and Amery being not silly are equivalent to Kianna being not disobedient and Roland being not environmental.
It can be concluded that Roland is not environmental and Clifford is disobedient once knowing that Amery is not unhappy.
It can be concluded that Jed is not disobedient once knowing that Amery is creepy or Connell is not silly.
Someone is disobedient and oak if and only if he is not unhappy.
If there is someone who is either creepy or silly, then Clifford is not oak.
If Roland is creepy, then Jed is not silly, and vice versa.
If someone who is not oak is also unhappy, then he is not disobedient.
If there is someone who is not environmental, then Jed is not silly.
If there is someone who is not oak, then Amery is unhappy.
If there is at least one people who is environmental or disobedient, then Kianna is unhappy.
Someone being oak is equivalent to being not creepy. | Kianna is silly. | contradiction |
Kianna is not silly.
Walter is unhappy.
Amery is disobedient.
Jed is oak.
Clifford is not silly.
Walter is creepy.
Walter is silly.
Roland is not environmental.
Kianna is not unhappy.
Clifford is disobedient.
Jed is not creepy.
Amery is creepy.Clifford being not silly is equivalent to Kianna being creepy and Jed being disobedient.
Amery being not creepy and Amery being not silly are equivalent to Kianna being not disobedient and Roland being not environmental.
It can be concluded that Roland is not environmental and Clifford is disobedient once knowing that Amery is not unhappy.
It can be concluded that Jed is not disobedient once knowing that Amery is creepy or Connell is not silly.
Someone is disobedient and oak if and only if he is not unhappy.
If there is someone who is either creepy or silly, then Clifford is not oak.
If Roland is creepy, then Jed is not silly, and vice versa.
If someone who is not oak is also unhappy, then he is not disobedient.
If there is someone who is not environmental, then Jed is not silly.
If there is someone who is not oak, then Amery is unhappy.
If there is at least one people who is environmental or disobedient, then Kianna is unhappy.
Someone being oak is equivalent to being not creepy. | Walter is creepy. | entailment |
Kianna is not silly.
Walter is unhappy.
Amery is disobedient.
Jed is oak.
Clifford is not silly.
Walter is creepy.
Walter is silly.
Roland is not environmental.
Kianna is not unhappy.
Clifford is disobedient.
Jed is not creepy.
Amery is creepy.Clifford being not silly is equivalent to Kianna being creepy and Jed being disobedient.
Amery being not creepy and Amery being not silly are equivalent to Kianna being not disobedient and Roland being not environmental.
It can be concluded that Roland is not environmental and Clifford is disobedient once knowing that Amery is not unhappy.
It can be concluded that Jed is not disobedient once knowing that Amery is creepy or Connell is not silly.
Someone is disobedient and oak if and only if he is not unhappy.
If there is someone who is either creepy or silly, then Clifford is not oak.
If Roland is creepy, then Jed is not silly, and vice versa.
If someone who is not oak is also unhappy, then he is not disobedient.
If there is someone who is not environmental, then Jed is not silly.
If there is someone who is not oak, then Amery is unhappy.
If there is at least one people who is environmental or disobedient, then Kianna is unhappy.
Someone being oak is equivalent to being not creepy. | Amery is creepy. | entailment |
Kianna is not silly.
Walter is unhappy.
Amery is disobedient.
Jed is oak.
Clifford is not silly.
Walter is creepy.
Walter is silly.
Roland is not environmental.
Kianna is not unhappy.
Clifford is disobedient.
Jed is not creepy.
Amery is creepy.Clifford being not silly is equivalent to Kianna being creepy and Jed being disobedient.
Amery being not creepy and Amery being not silly are equivalent to Kianna being not disobedient and Roland being not environmental.
It can be concluded that Roland is not environmental and Clifford is disobedient once knowing that Amery is not unhappy.
It can be concluded that Jed is not disobedient once knowing that Amery is creepy or Connell is not silly.
Someone is disobedient and oak if and only if he is not unhappy.
If there is someone who is either creepy or silly, then Clifford is not oak.
If Roland is creepy, then Jed is not silly, and vice versa.
If someone who is not oak is also unhappy, then he is not disobedient.
If there is someone who is not environmental, then Jed is not silly.
If there is someone who is not oak, then Amery is unhappy.
If there is at least one people who is environmental or disobedient, then Kianna is unhappy.
Someone being oak is equivalent to being not creepy. | Connell is not silly. | neutral |
Kianna is not silly.
Walter is unhappy.
Amery is disobedient.
Jed is oak.
Clifford is not silly.
Walter is creepy.
Walter is silly.
Roland is not environmental.
Kianna is not unhappy.
Clifford is disobedient.
Jed is not creepy.
Amery is creepy.Clifford being not silly is equivalent to Kianna being creepy and Jed being disobedient.
Amery being not creepy and Amery being not silly are equivalent to Kianna being not disobedient and Roland being not environmental.
It can be concluded that Roland is not environmental and Clifford is disobedient once knowing that Amery is not unhappy.
It can be concluded that Jed is not disobedient once knowing that Amery is creepy or Connell is not silly.
Someone is disobedient and oak if and only if he is not unhappy.
If there is someone who is either creepy or silly, then Clifford is not oak.
If Roland is creepy, then Jed is not silly, and vice versa.
If someone who is not oak is also unhappy, then he is not disobedient.
If there is someone who is not environmental, then Jed is not silly.
If there is someone who is not oak, then Amery is unhappy.
If there is at least one people who is environmental or disobedient, then Kianna is unhappy.
Someone being oak is equivalent to being not creepy. | Kianna is not oak. | contradiction |
Kianna is not silly.
Walter is unhappy.
Amery is disobedient.
Jed is oak.
Clifford is not silly.
Walter is creepy.
Walter is silly.
Roland is not environmental.
Kianna is not unhappy.
Clifford is disobedient.
Jed is not creepy.
Amery is creepy.Clifford being not silly is equivalent to Kianna being creepy and Jed being disobedient.
Amery being not creepy and Amery being not silly are equivalent to Kianna being not disobedient and Roland being not environmental.
It can be concluded that Roland is not environmental and Clifford is disobedient once knowing that Amery is not unhappy.
It can be concluded that Jed is not disobedient once knowing that Amery is creepy or Connell is not silly.
Someone is disobedient and oak if and only if he is not unhappy.
If there is someone who is either creepy or silly, then Clifford is not oak.
If Roland is creepy, then Jed is not silly, and vice versa.
If someone who is not oak is also unhappy, then he is not disobedient.
If there is someone who is not environmental, then Jed is not silly.
If there is someone who is not oak, then Amery is unhappy.
If there is at least one people who is environmental or disobedient, then Kianna is unhappy.
Someone being oak is equivalent to being not creepy. | Roland is not disobedient. | neutral |
Kianna is not silly.
Walter is unhappy.
Amery is disobedient.
Jed is oak.
Clifford is not silly.
Walter is creepy.
Walter is silly.
Roland is not environmental.
Kianna is not unhappy.
Clifford is disobedient.
Jed is not creepy.
Amery is creepy.Clifford being not silly is equivalent to Kianna being creepy and Jed being disobedient.
Amery being not creepy and Amery being not silly are equivalent to Kianna being not disobedient and Roland being not environmental.
It can be concluded that Roland is not environmental and Clifford is disobedient once knowing that Amery is not unhappy.
It can be concluded that Jed is not disobedient once knowing that Amery is creepy or Connell is not silly.
Someone is disobedient and oak if and only if he is not unhappy.
If there is someone who is either creepy or silly, then Clifford is not oak.
If Roland is creepy, then Jed is not silly, and vice versa.
If someone who is not oak is also unhappy, then he is not disobedient.
If there is someone who is not environmental, then Jed is not silly.
If there is someone who is not oak, then Amery is unhappy.
If there is at least one people who is environmental or disobedient, then Kianna is unhappy.
Someone being oak is equivalent to being not creepy. | Jed is disobedient. | self_contradiction |
Kianna is not silly.
Walter is unhappy.
Amery is disobedient.
Jed is oak.
Clifford is not silly.
Walter is creepy.
Walter is silly.
Roland is not environmental.
Kianna is not unhappy.
Clifford is disobedient.
Jed is not creepy.
Amery is creepy.Clifford being not silly is equivalent to Kianna being creepy and Jed being disobedient.
Amery being not creepy and Amery being not silly are equivalent to Kianna being not disobedient and Roland being not environmental.
It can be concluded that Roland is not environmental and Clifford is disobedient once knowing that Amery is not unhappy.
It can be concluded that Jed is not disobedient once knowing that Amery is creepy or Connell is not silly.
Someone is disobedient and oak if and only if he is not unhappy.
If there is someone who is either creepy or silly, then Clifford is not oak.
If Roland is creepy, then Jed is not silly, and vice versa.
If someone who is not oak is also unhappy, then he is not disobedient.
If there is someone who is not environmental, then Jed is not silly.
If there is someone who is not oak, then Amery is unhappy.
If there is at least one people who is environmental or disobedient, then Kianna is unhappy.
Someone being oak is equivalent to being not creepy. | Kianna is creepy. | self_contradiction |
Kianna is not silly.
Walter is unhappy.
Amery is disobedient.
Jed is oak.
Clifford is not silly.
Walter is creepy.
Walter is silly.
Roland is not environmental.
Kianna is not unhappy.
Clifford is disobedient.
Jed is not creepy.
Amery is creepy.Clifford being not silly is equivalent to Kianna being creepy and Jed being disobedient.
Amery being not creepy and Amery being not silly are equivalent to Kianna being not disobedient and Roland being not environmental.
It can be concluded that Roland is not environmental and Clifford is disobedient once knowing that Amery is not unhappy.
It can be concluded that Jed is not disobedient once knowing that Amery is creepy or Connell is not silly.
Someone is disobedient and oak if and only if he is not unhappy.
If there is someone who is either creepy or silly, then Clifford is not oak.
If Roland is creepy, then Jed is not silly, and vice versa.
If someone who is not oak is also unhappy, then he is not disobedient.
If there is someone who is not environmental, then Jed is not silly.
If there is someone who is not oak, then Amery is unhappy.
If there is at least one people who is environmental or disobedient, then Kianna is unhappy.
Someone being oak is equivalent to being not creepy. | Roland is creepy. | entailment |
Kianna is not silly.
Walter is unhappy.
Amery is disobedient.
Jed is oak.
Clifford is not silly.
Walter is creepy.
Walter is silly.
Roland is not environmental.
Kianna is not unhappy.
Clifford is disobedient.
Jed is not creepy.
Amery is creepy.Clifford being not silly is equivalent to Kianna being creepy and Jed being disobedient.
Amery being not creepy and Amery being not silly are equivalent to Kianna being not disobedient and Roland being not environmental.
It can be concluded that Roland is not environmental and Clifford is disobedient once knowing that Amery is not unhappy.
It can be concluded that Jed is not disobedient once knowing that Amery is creepy or Connell is not silly.
Someone is disobedient and oak if and only if he is not unhappy.
If there is someone who is either creepy or silly, then Clifford is not oak.
If Roland is creepy, then Jed is not silly, and vice versa.
If someone who is not oak is also unhappy, then he is not disobedient.
If there is someone who is not environmental, then Jed is not silly.
If there is someone who is not oak, then Amery is unhappy.
If there is at least one people who is environmental or disobedient, then Kianna is unhappy.
Someone being oak is equivalent to being not creepy. | Jed is not environmental. | neutral |
Kianna is not silly.
Walter is unhappy.
Amery is disobedient.
Jed is oak.
Clifford is not silly.
Walter is creepy.
Walter is silly.
Roland is not environmental.
Kianna is not unhappy.
Clifford is disobedient.
Jed is not creepy.
Amery is creepy.Clifford being not silly is equivalent to Kianna being creepy and Jed being disobedient.
Amery being not creepy and Amery being not silly are equivalent to Kianna being not disobedient and Roland being not environmental.
It can be concluded that Roland is not environmental and Clifford is disobedient once knowing that Amery is not unhappy.
It can be concluded that Jed is not disobedient once knowing that Amery is creepy or Connell is not silly.
Someone is disobedient and oak if and only if he is not unhappy.
If there is someone who is either creepy or silly, then Clifford is not oak.
If Roland is creepy, then Jed is not silly, and vice versa.
If someone who is not oak is also unhappy, then he is not disobedient.
If there is someone who is not environmental, then Jed is not silly.
If there is someone who is not oak, then Amery is unhappy.
If there is at least one people who is environmental or disobedient, then Kianna is unhappy.
Someone being oak is equivalent to being not creepy. | Kianna is unhappy. | self_contradiction |
Kianna is not silly.
Walter is unhappy.
Amery is disobedient.
Jed is oak.
Clifford is not silly.
Walter is creepy.
Walter is silly.
Roland is not environmental.
Kianna is not unhappy.
Clifford is disobedient.
Jed is not creepy.
Amery is creepy.Clifford being not silly is equivalent to Kianna being creepy and Jed being disobedient.
Amery being not creepy and Amery being not silly are equivalent to Kianna being not disobedient and Roland being not environmental.
It can be concluded that Roland is not environmental and Clifford is disobedient once knowing that Amery is not unhappy.
It can be concluded that Jed is not disobedient once knowing that Amery is creepy or Connell is not silly.
Someone is disobedient and oak if and only if he is not unhappy.
If there is someone who is either creepy or silly, then Clifford is not oak.
If Roland is creepy, then Jed is not silly, and vice versa.
If someone who is not oak is also unhappy, then he is not disobedient.
If there is someone who is not environmental, then Jed is not silly.
If there is someone who is not oak, then Amery is unhappy.
If there is at least one people who is environmental or disobedient, then Kianna is unhappy.
Someone being oak is equivalent to being not creepy. | Roland is environmental. | contradiction |
Kianna is not silly.
Walter is unhappy.
Amery is disobedient.
Jed is oak.
Clifford is not silly.
Walter is creepy.
Walter is silly.
Roland is not environmental.
Kianna is not unhappy.
Clifford is disobedient.
Jed is not creepy.
Amery is creepy.Clifford being not silly is equivalent to Kianna being creepy and Jed being disobedient.
Amery being not creepy and Amery being not silly are equivalent to Kianna being not disobedient and Roland being not environmental.
It can be concluded that Roland is not environmental and Clifford is disobedient once knowing that Amery is not unhappy.
It can be concluded that Jed is not disobedient once knowing that Amery is creepy or Connell is not silly.
Someone is disobedient and oak if and only if he is not unhappy.
If there is someone who is either creepy or silly, then Clifford is not oak.
If Roland is creepy, then Jed is not silly, and vice versa.
If someone who is not oak is also unhappy, then he is not disobedient.
If there is someone who is not environmental, then Jed is not silly.
If there is someone who is not oak, then Amery is unhappy.
If there is at least one people who is environmental or disobedient, then Kianna is unhappy.
Someone being oak is equivalent to being not creepy. | Connell is oak. | neutral |
Kianna is not silly.
Walter is unhappy.
Amery is disobedient.
Jed is oak.
Clifford is not silly.
Walter is creepy.
Walter is silly.
Roland is not environmental.
Kianna is not unhappy.
Clifford is disobedient.
Jed is not creepy.
Amery is creepy.Clifford being not silly is equivalent to Kianna being creepy and Jed being disobedient.
Amery being not creepy and Amery being not silly are equivalent to Kianna being not disobedient and Roland being not environmental.
It can be concluded that Roland is not environmental and Clifford is disobedient once knowing that Amery is not unhappy.
It can be concluded that Jed is not disobedient once knowing that Amery is creepy or Connell is not silly.
Someone is disobedient and oak if and only if he is not unhappy.
If there is someone who is either creepy or silly, then Clifford is not oak.
If Roland is creepy, then Jed is not silly, and vice versa.
If someone who is not oak is also unhappy, then he is not disobedient.
If there is someone who is not environmental, then Jed is not silly.
If there is someone who is not oak, then Amery is unhappy.
If there is at least one people who is environmental or disobedient, then Kianna is unhappy.
Someone being oak is equivalent to being not creepy. | Kianna is oak. | entailment |
Kianna is not silly.
Walter is unhappy.
Amery is disobedient.
Jed is oak.
Clifford is not silly.
Walter is creepy.
Walter is silly.
Roland is not environmental.
Kianna is not unhappy.
Clifford is disobedient.
Jed is not creepy.
Amery is creepy.Clifford being not silly is equivalent to Kianna being creepy and Jed being disobedient.
Amery being not creepy and Amery being not silly are equivalent to Kianna being not disobedient and Roland being not environmental.
It can be concluded that Roland is not environmental and Clifford is disobedient once knowing that Amery is not unhappy.
It can be concluded that Jed is not disobedient once knowing that Amery is creepy or Connell is not silly.
Someone is disobedient and oak if and only if he is not unhappy.
If there is someone who is either creepy or silly, then Clifford is not oak.
If Roland is creepy, then Jed is not silly, and vice versa.
If someone who is not oak is also unhappy, then he is not disobedient.
If there is someone who is not environmental, then Jed is not silly.
If there is someone who is not oak, then Amery is unhappy.
If there is at least one people who is environmental or disobedient, then Kianna is unhappy.
Someone being oak is equivalent to being not creepy. | Clifford is not creepy. | neutral |
Kianna is not silly.
Walter is unhappy.
Amery is disobedient.
Jed is oak.
Clifford is not silly.
Walter is creepy.
Walter is silly.
Roland is not environmental.
Kianna is not unhappy.
Clifford is disobedient.
Jed is not creepy.
Amery is creepy.Clifford being not silly is equivalent to Kianna being creepy and Jed being disobedient.
Amery being not creepy and Amery being not silly are equivalent to Kianna being not disobedient and Roland being not environmental.
It can be concluded that Roland is not environmental and Clifford is disobedient once knowing that Amery is not unhappy.
It can be concluded that Jed is not disobedient once knowing that Amery is creepy or Connell is not silly.
Someone is disobedient and oak if and only if he is not unhappy.
If there is someone who is either creepy or silly, then Clifford is not oak.
If Roland is creepy, then Jed is not silly, and vice versa.
If someone who is not oak is also unhappy, then he is not disobedient.
If there is someone who is not environmental, then Jed is not silly.
If there is someone who is not oak, then Amery is unhappy.
If there is at least one people who is environmental or disobedient, then Kianna is unhappy.
Someone being oak is equivalent to being not creepy. | Walter is not unhappy. | contradiction |
Kianna is not silly.
Walter is unhappy.
Amery is disobedient.
Jed is oak.
Clifford is not silly.
Walter is creepy.
Walter is silly.
Roland is not environmental.
Kianna is not unhappy.
Clifford is disobedient.
Jed is not creepy.
Amery is creepy.Clifford being not silly is equivalent to Kianna being creepy and Jed being disobedient.
Amery being not creepy and Amery being not silly are equivalent to Kianna being not disobedient and Roland being not environmental.
It can be concluded that Roland is not environmental and Clifford is disobedient once knowing that Amery is not unhappy.
It can be concluded that Jed is not disobedient once knowing that Amery is creepy or Connell is not silly.
Someone is disobedient and oak if and only if he is not unhappy.
If there is someone who is either creepy or silly, then Clifford is not oak.
If Roland is creepy, then Jed is not silly, and vice versa.
If someone who is not oak is also unhappy, then he is not disobedient.
If there is someone who is not environmental, then Jed is not silly.
If there is someone who is not oak, then Amery is unhappy.
If there is at least one people who is environmental or disobedient, then Kianna is unhappy.
Someone being oak is equivalent to being not creepy. | Jed is not disobedient. | self_contradiction |
Kianna is not silly.
Walter is unhappy.
Amery is disobedient.
Jed is oak.
Clifford is not silly.
Walter is creepy.
Walter is silly.
Roland is not environmental.
Kianna is not unhappy.
Clifford is disobedient.
Jed is not creepy.
Amery is creepy.Clifford being not silly is equivalent to Kianna being creepy and Jed being disobedient.
Amery being not creepy and Amery being not silly are equivalent to Kianna being not disobedient and Roland being not environmental.
It can be concluded that Roland is not environmental and Clifford is disobedient once knowing that Amery is not unhappy.
It can be concluded that Jed is not disobedient once knowing that Amery is creepy or Connell is not silly.
Someone is disobedient and oak if and only if he is not unhappy.
If there is someone who is either creepy or silly, then Clifford is not oak.
If Roland is creepy, then Jed is not silly, and vice versa.
If someone who is not oak is also unhappy, then he is not disobedient.
If there is someone who is not environmental, then Jed is not silly.
If there is someone who is not oak, then Amery is unhappy.
If there is at least one people who is environmental or disobedient, then Kianna is unhappy.
Someone being oak is equivalent to being not creepy. | Kianna is not creepy. | self_contradiction |
Gilroy is not nervous.
Lloyd is not existing.
Henry is compassionate.
Truman is not existing.
Ryan is compassionate.
Henry is not competitive.
Truman is not tired.
Henry is existing.
Truman is not competitive.
Austin is not tired.
Truman is compassionate.
Henry is not selfish.If Ryan is not compassionate, then Henry is selfish, and vice versa.
If someone is compassionate and competitive, then he is both nervous and tired, and vice versa.
Austin being selfish and Lloyd being not tired imply that Lloyd is existing.
Someone who is both existing and not nervous is always not selfish.
Ryan being compassionate and Henry being competitive are equivalent to Austin being tired and Albern being nervous.
If there is at least one people who is both not competitive and not selfish, then Lloyd is existing.
Someone who is tired is always both existing and not selfish.
Someone is selfish if and only if he is compassionate.
If someone is not tired or compassionate, then he is not competitive.
If Lloyd is not tired and Ryan is existing, then Austin is nervous.
If Gilroy is not existing, then Albern is not competitive, and vice versa.
Someone who is nervous is always not selfish. | Truman is tired. | contradiction |
Gilroy is not nervous.
Lloyd is not existing.
Henry is compassionate.
Truman is not existing.
Ryan is compassionate.
Henry is not competitive.
Truman is not tired.
Henry is existing.
Truman is not competitive.
Austin is not tired.
Truman is compassionate.
Henry is not selfish.If Ryan is not compassionate, then Henry is selfish, and vice versa.
If someone is compassionate and competitive, then he is both nervous and tired, and vice versa.
Austin being selfish and Lloyd being not tired imply that Lloyd is existing.
Someone who is both existing and not nervous is always not selfish.
Ryan being compassionate and Henry being competitive are equivalent to Austin being tired and Albern being nervous.
If there is at least one people who is both not competitive and not selfish, then Lloyd is existing.
Someone who is tired is always both existing and not selfish.
Someone is selfish if and only if he is compassionate.
If someone is not tired or compassionate, then he is not competitive.
If Lloyd is not tired and Ryan is existing, then Austin is nervous.
If Gilroy is not existing, then Albern is not competitive, and vice versa.
Someone who is nervous is always not selfish. | Albern is existing. | neutral |
Gilroy is not nervous.
Lloyd is not existing.
Henry is compassionate.
Truman is not existing.
Ryan is compassionate.
Henry is not competitive.
Truman is not tired.
Henry is existing.
Truman is not competitive.
Austin is not tired.
Truman is compassionate.
Henry is not selfish.If Ryan is not compassionate, then Henry is selfish, and vice versa.
If someone is compassionate and competitive, then he is both nervous and tired, and vice versa.
Austin being selfish and Lloyd being not tired imply that Lloyd is existing.
Someone who is both existing and not nervous is always not selfish.
Ryan being compassionate and Henry being competitive are equivalent to Austin being tired and Albern being nervous.
If there is at least one people who is both not competitive and not selfish, then Lloyd is existing.
Someone who is tired is always both existing and not selfish.
Someone is selfish if and only if he is compassionate.
If someone is not tired or compassionate, then he is not competitive.
If Lloyd is not tired and Ryan is existing, then Austin is nervous.
If Gilroy is not existing, then Albern is not competitive, and vice versa.
Someone who is nervous is always not selfish. | Ryan is not selfish. | contradiction |
Gilroy is not nervous.
Lloyd is not existing.
Henry is compassionate.
Truman is not existing.
Ryan is compassionate.
Henry is not competitive.
Truman is not tired.
Henry is existing.
Truman is not competitive.
Austin is not tired.
Truman is compassionate.
Henry is not selfish.If Ryan is not compassionate, then Henry is selfish, and vice versa.
If someone is compassionate and competitive, then he is both nervous and tired, and vice versa.
Austin being selfish and Lloyd being not tired imply that Lloyd is existing.
Someone who is both existing and not nervous is always not selfish.
Ryan being compassionate and Henry being competitive are equivalent to Austin being tired and Albern being nervous.
If there is at least one people who is both not competitive and not selfish, then Lloyd is existing.
Someone who is tired is always both existing and not selfish.
Someone is selfish if and only if he is compassionate.
If someone is not tired or compassionate, then he is not competitive.
If Lloyd is not tired and Ryan is existing, then Austin is nervous.
If Gilroy is not existing, then Albern is not competitive, and vice versa.
Someone who is nervous is always not selfish. | Lloyd is existing. | self_contradiction |
Gilroy is not nervous.
Lloyd is not existing.
Henry is compassionate.
Truman is not existing.
Ryan is compassionate.
Henry is not competitive.
Truman is not tired.
Henry is existing.
Truman is not competitive.
Austin is not tired.
Truman is compassionate.
Henry is not selfish.If Ryan is not compassionate, then Henry is selfish, and vice versa.
If someone is compassionate and competitive, then he is both nervous and tired, and vice versa.
Austin being selfish and Lloyd being not tired imply that Lloyd is existing.
Someone who is both existing and not nervous is always not selfish.
Ryan being compassionate and Henry being competitive are equivalent to Austin being tired and Albern being nervous.
If there is at least one people who is both not competitive and not selfish, then Lloyd is existing.
Someone who is tired is always both existing and not selfish.
Someone is selfish if and only if he is compassionate.
If someone is not tired or compassionate, then he is not competitive.
If Lloyd is not tired and Ryan is existing, then Austin is nervous.
If Gilroy is not existing, then Albern is not competitive, and vice versa.
Someone who is nervous is always not selfish. | Henry is not existing. | contradiction |
Gilroy is not nervous.
Lloyd is not existing.
Henry is compassionate.
Truman is not existing.
Ryan is compassionate.
Henry is not competitive.
Truman is not tired.
Henry is existing.
Truman is not competitive.
Austin is not tired.
Truman is compassionate.
Henry is not selfish.If Ryan is not compassionate, then Henry is selfish, and vice versa.
If someone is compassionate and competitive, then he is both nervous and tired, and vice versa.
Austin being selfish and Lloyd being not tired imply that Lloyd is existing.
Someone who is both existing and not nervous is always not selfish.
Ryan being compassionate and Henry being competitive are equivalent to Austin being tired and Albern being nervous.
If there is at least one people who is both not competitive and not selfish, then Lloyd is existing.
Someone who is tired is always both existing and not selfish.
Someone is selfish if and only if he is compassionate.
If someone is not tired or compassionate, then he is not competitive.
If Lloyd is not tired and Ryan is existing, then Austin is nervous.
If Gilroy is not existing, then Albern is not competitive, and vice versa.
Someone who is nervous is always not selfish. | Ryan is compassionate. | self_contradiction |
Gilroy is not nervous.
Lloyd is not existing.
Henry is compassionate.
Truman is not existing.
Ryan is compassionate.
Henry is not competitive.
Truman is not tired.
Henry is existing.
Truman is not competitive.
Austin is not tired.
Truman is compassionate.
Henry is not selfish.If Ryan is not compassionate, then Henry is selfish, and vice versa.
If someone is compassionate and competitive, then he is both nervous and tired, and vice versa.
Austin being selfish and Lloyd being not tired imply that Lloyd is existing.
Someone who is both existing and not nervous is always not selfish.
Ryan being compassionate and Henry being competitive are equivalent to Austin being tired and Albern being nervous.
If there is at least one people who is both not competitive and not selfish, then Lloyd is existing.
Someone who is tired is always both existing and not selfish.
Someone is selfish if and only if he is compassionate.
If someone is not tired or compassionate, then he is not competitive.
If Lloyd is not tired and Ryan is existing, then Austin is nervous.
If Gilroy is not existing, then Albern is not competitive, and vice versa.
Someone who is nervous is always not selfish. | Lloyd is not competitive. | neutral |
Gilroy is not nervous.
Lloyd is not existing.
Henry is compassionate.
Truman is not existing.
Ryan is compassionate.
Henry is not competitive.
Truman is not tired.
Henry is existing.
Truman is not competitive.
Austin is not tired.
Truman is compassionate.
Henry is not selfish.If Ryan is not compassionate, then Henry is selfish, and vice versa.
If someone is compassionate and competitive, then he is both nervous and tired, and vice versa.
Austin being selfish and Lloyd being not tired imply that Lloyd is existing.
Someone who is both existing and not nervous is always not selfish.
Ryan being compassionate and Henry being competitive are equivalent to Austin being tired and Albern being nervous.
If there is at least one people who is both not competitive and not selfish, then Lloyd is existing.
Someone who is tired is always both existing and not selfish.
Someone is selfish if and only if he is compassionate.
If someone is not tired or compassionate, then he is not competitive.
If Lloyd is not tired and Ryan is existing, then Austin is nervous.
If Gilroy is not existing, then Albern is not competitive, and vice versa.
Someone who is nervous is always not selfish. | Truman is compassionate. | entailment |
Gilroy is not nervous.
Lloyd is not existing.
Henry is compassionate.
Truman is not existing.
Ryan is compassionate.
Henry is not competitive.
Truman is not tired.
Henry is existing.
Truman is not competitive.
Austin is not tired.
Truman is compassionate.
Henry is not selfish.If Ryan is not compassionate, then Henry is selfish, and vice versa.
If someone is compassionate and competitive, then he is both nervous and tired, and vice versa.
Austin being selfish and Lloyd being not tired imply that Lloyd is existing.
Someone who is both existing and not nervous is always not selfish.
Ryan being compassionate and Henry being competitive are equivalent to Austin being tired and Albern being nervous.
If there is at least one people who is both not competitive and not selfish, then Lloyd is existing.
Someone who is tired is always both existing and not selfish.
Someone is selfish if and only if he is compassionate.
If someone is not tired or compassionate, then he is not competitive.
If Lloyd is not tired and Ryan is existing, then Austin is nervous.
If Gilroy is not existing, then Albern is not competitive, and vice versa.
Someone who is nervous is always not selfish. | Truman is competitive. | contradiction |
Gilroy is not nervous.
Lloyd is not existing.
Henry is compassionate.
Truman is not existing.
Ryan is compassionate.
Henry is not competitive.
Truman is not tired.
Henry is existing.
Truman is not competitive.
Austin is not tired.
Truman is compassionate.
Henry is not selfish.If Ryan is not compassionate, then Henry is selfish, and vice versa.
If someone is compassionate and competitive, then he is both nervous and tired, and vice versa.
Austin being selfish and Lloyd being not tired imply that Lloyd is existing.
Someone who is both existing and not nervous is always not selfish.
Ryan being compassionate and Henry being competitive are equivalent to Austin being tired and Albern being nervous.
If there is at least one people who is both not competitive and not selfish, then Lloyd is existing.
Someone who is tired is always both existing and not selfish.
Someone is selfish if and only if he is compassionate.
If someone is not tired or compassionate, then he is not competitive.
If Lloyd is not tired and Ryan is existing, then Austin is nervous.
If Gilroy is not existing, then Albern is not competitive, and vice versa.
Someone who is nervous is always not selfish. | Albern is not existing. | neutral |
Gilroy is not nervous.
Lloyd is not existing.
Henry is compassionate.
Truman is not existing.
Ryan is compassionate.
Henry is not competitive.
Truman is not tired.
Henry is existing.
Truman is not competitive.
Austin is not tired.
Truman is compassionate.
Henry is not selfish.If Ryan is not compassionate, then Henry is selfish, and vice versa.
If someone is compassionate and competitive, then he is both nervous and tired, and vice versa.
Austin being selfish and Lloyd being not tired imply that Lloyd is existing.
Someone who is both existing and not nervous is always not selfish.
Ryan being compassionate and Henry being competitive are equivalent to Austin being tired and Albern being nervous.
If there is at least one people who is both not competitive and not selfish, then Lloyd is existing.
Someone who is tired is always both existing and not selfish.
Someone is selfish if and only if he is compassionate.
If someone is not tired or compassionate, then he is not competitive.
If Lloyd is not tired and Ryan is existing, then Austin is nervous.
If Gilroy is not existing, then Albern is not competitive, and vice versa.
Someone who is nervous is always not selfish. | Gilroy is not nervous. | entailment |
Gilroy is not nervous.
Lloyd is not existing.
Henry is compassionate.
Truman is not existing.
Ryan is compassionate.
Henry is not competitive.
Truman is not tired.
Henry is existing.
Truman is not competitive.
Austin is not tired.
Truman is compassionate.
Henry is not selfish.If Ryan is not compassionate, then Henry is selfish, and vice versa.
If someone is compassionate and competitive, then he is both nervous and tired, and vice versa.
Austin being selfish and Lloyd being not tired imply that Lloyd is existing.
Someone who is both existing and not nervous is always not selfish.
Ryan being compassionate and Henry being competitive are equivalent to Austin being tired and Albern being nervous.
If there is at least one people who is both not competitive and not selfish, then Lloyd is existing.
Someone who is tired is always both existing and not selfish.
Someone is selfish if and only if he is compassionate.
If someone is not tired or compassionate, then he is not competitive.
If Lloyd is not tired and Ryan is existing, then Austin is nervous.
If Gilroy is not existing, then Albern is not competitive, and vice versa.
Someone who is nervous is always not selfish. | Lloyd is not existing. | self_contradiction |
Gilroy is not nervous.
Lloyd is not existing.
Henry is compassionate.
Truman is not existing.
Ryan is compassionate.
Henry is not competitive.
Truman is not tired.
Henry is existing.
Truman is not competitive.
Austin is not tired.
Truman is compassionate.
Henry is not selfish.If Ryan is not compassionate, then Henry is selfish, and vice versa.
If someone is compassionate and competitive, then he is both nervous and tired, and vice versa.
Austin being selfish and Lloyd being not tired imply that Lloyd is existing.
Someone who is both existing and not nervous is always not selfish.
Ryan being compassionate and Henry being competitive are equivalent to Austin being tired and Albern being nervous.
If there is at least one people who is both not competitive and not selfish, then Lloyd is existing.
Someone who is tired is always both existing and not selfish.
Someone is selfish if and only if he is compassionate.
If someone is not tired or compassionate, then he is not competitive.
If Lloyd is not tired and Ryan is existing, then Austin is nervous.
If Gilroy is not existing, then Albern is not competitive, and vice versa.
Someone who is nervous is always not selfish. | Henry is not competitive. | entailment |
Gilroy is not nervous.
Lloyd is not existing.
Henry is compassionate.
Truman is not existing.
Ryan is compassionate.
Henry is not competitive.
Truman is not tired.
Henry is existing.
Truman is not competitive.
Austin is not tired.
Truman is compassionate.
Henry is not selfish.If Ryan is not compassionate, then Henry is selfish, and vice versa.
If someone is compassionate and competitive, then he is both nervous and tired, and vice versa.
Austin being selfish and Lloyd being not tired imply that Lloyd is existing.
Someone who is both existing and not nervous is always not selfish.
Ryan being compassionate and Henry being competitive are equivalent to Austin being tired and Albern being nervous.
If there is at least one people who is both not competitive and not selfish, then Lloyd is existing.
Someone who is tired is always both existing and not selfish.
Someone is selfish if and only if he is compassionate.
If someone is not tired or compassionate, then he is not competitive.
If Lloyd is not tired and Ryan is existing, then Austin is nervous.
If Gilroy is not existing, then Albern is not competitive, and vice versa.
Someone who is nervous is always not selfish. | Truman is not selfish. | contradiction |
Gilroy is not nervous.
Lloyd is not existing.
Henry is compassionate.
Truman is not existing.
Ryan is compassionate.
Henry is not competitive.
Truman is not tired.
Henry is existing.
Truman is not competitive.
Austin is not tired.
Truman is compassionate.
Henry is not selfish.If Ryan is not compassionate, then Henry is selfish, and vice versa.
If someone is compassionate and competitive, then he is both nervous and tired, and vice versa.
Austin being selfish and Lloyd being not tired imply that Lloyd is existing.
Someone who is both existing and not nervous is always not selfish.
Ryan being compassionate and Henry being competitive are equivalent to Austin being tired and Albern being nervous.
If there is at least one people who is both not competitive and not selfish, then Lloyd is existing.
Someone who is tired is always both existing and not selfish.
Someone is selfish if and only if he is compassionate.
If someone is not tired or compassionate, then he is not competitive.
If Lloyd is not tired and Ryan is existing, then Austin is nervous.
If Gilroy is not existing, then Albern is not competitive, and vice versa.
Someone who is nervous is always not selfish. | Gilroy is not existing. | neutral |
Gilroy is not nervous.
Lloyd is not existing.
Henry is compassionate.
Truman is not existing.
Ryan is compassionate.
Henry is not competitive.
Truman is not tired.
Henry is existing.
Truman is not competitive.
Austin is not tired.
Truman is compassionate.
Henry is not selfish.If Ryan is not compassionate, then Henry is selfish, and vice versa.
If someone is compassionate and competitive, then he is both nervous and tired, and vice versa.
Austin being selfish and Lloyd being not tired imply that Lloyd is existing.
Someone who is both existing and not nervous is always not selfish.
Ryan being compassionate and Henry being competitive are equivalent to Austin being tired and Albern being nervous.
If there is at least one people who is both not competitive and not selfish, then Lloyd is existing.
Someone who is tired is always both existing and not selfish.
Someone is selfish if and only if he is compassionate.
If someone is not tired or compassionate, then he is not competitive.
If Lloyd is not tired and Ryan is existing, then Austin is nervous.
If Gilroy is not existing, then Albern is not competitive, and vice versa.
Someone who is nervous is always not selfish. | Henry is selfish. | self_contradiction |
Gilroy is not nervous.
Lloyd is not existing.
Henry is compassionate.
Truman is not existing.
Ryan is compassionate.
Henry is not competitive.
Truman is not tired.
Henry is existing.
Truman is not competitive.
Austin is not tired.
Truman is compassionate.
Henry is not selfish.If Ryan is not compassionate, then Henry is selfish, and vice versa.
If someone is compassionate and competitive, then he is both nervous and tired, and vice versa.
Austin being selfish and Lloyd being not tired imply that Lloyd is existing.
Someone who is both existing and not nervous is always not selfish.
Ryan being compassionate and Henry being competitive are equivalent to Austin being tired and Albern being nervous.
If there is at least one people who is both not competitive and not selfish, then Lloyd is existing.
Someone who is tired is always both existing and not selfish.
Someone is selfish if and only if he is compassionate.
If someone is not tired or compassionate, then he is not competitive.
If Lloyd is not tired and Ryan is existing, then Austin is nervous.
If Gilroy is not existing, then Albern is not competitive, and vice versa.
Someone who is nervous is always not selfish. | Truman is not tired. | entailment |
Gilroy is not nervous.
Lloyd is not existing.
Henry is compassionate.
Truman is not existing.
Ryan is compassionate.
Henry is not competitive.
Truman is not tired.
Henry is existing.
Truman is not competitive.
Austin is not tired.
Truman is compassionate.
Henry is not selfish.If Ryan is not compassionate, then Henry is selfish, and vice versa.
If someone is compassionate and competitive, then he is both nervous and tired, and vice versa.
Austin being selfish and Lloyd being not tired imply that Lloyd is existing.
Someone who is both existing and not nervous is always not selfish.
Ryan being compassionate and Henry being competitive are equivalent to Austin being tired and Albern being nervous.
If there is at least one people who is both not competitive and not selfish, then Lloyd is existing.
Someone who is tired is always both existing and not selfish.
Someone is selfish if and only if he is compassionate.
If someone is not tired or compassionate, then he is not competitive.
If Lloyd is not tired and Ryan is existing, then Austin is nervous.
If Gilroy is not existing, then Albern is not competitive, and vice versa.
Someone who is nervous is always not selfish. | Ryan is not compassionate. | self_contradiction |
Gilroy is not nervous.
Lloyd is not existing.
Henry is compassionate.
Truman is not existing.
Ryan is compassionate.
Henry is not competitive.
Truman is not tired.
Henry is existing.
Truman is not competitive.
Austin is not tired.
Truman is compassionate.
Henry is not selfish.If Ryan is not compassionate, then Henry is selfish, and vice versa.
If someone is compassionate and competitive, then he is both nervous and tired, and vice versa.
Austin being selfish and Lloyd being not tired imply that Lloyd is existing.
Someone who is both existing and not nervous is always not selfish.
Ryan being compassionate and Henry being competitive are equivalent to Austin being tired and Albern being nervous.
If there is at least one people who is both not competitive and not selfish, then Lloyd is existing.
Someone who is tired is always both existing and not selfish.
Someone is selfish if and only if he is compassionate.
If someone is not tired or compassionate, then he is not competitive.
If Lloyd is not tired and Ryan is existing, then Austin is nervous.
If Gilroy is not existing, then Albern is not competitive, and vice versa.
Someone who is nervous is always not selfish. | Lloyd is not nervous. | neutral |
Gilroy is not nervous.
Lloyd is not existing.
Henry is compassionate.
Truman is not existing.
Ryan is compassionate.
Henry is not competitive.
Truman is not tired.
Henry is existing.
Truman is not competitive.
Austin is not tired.
Truman is compassionate.
Henry is not selfish.If Ryan is not compassionate, then Henry is selfish, and vice versa.
If someone is compassionate and competitive, then he is both nervous and tired, and vice versa.
Austin being selfish and Lloyd being not tired imply that Lloyd is existing.
Someone who is both existing and not nervous is always not selfish.
Ryan being compassionate and Henry being competitive are equivalent to Austin being tired and Albern being nervous.
If there is at least one people who is both not competitive and not selfish, then Lloyd is existing.
Someone who is tired is always both existing and not selfish.
Someone is selfish if and only if he is compassionate.
If someone is not tired or compassionate, then he is not competitive.
If Lloyd is not tired and Ryan is existing, then Austin is nervous.
If Gilroy is not existing, then Albern is not competitive, and vice versa.
Someone who is nervous is always not selfish. | Truman is not existing. | entailment |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.