premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Phoebe is accurate.
Basil is not pink.
Miranda is pink.
Matthew is not accurate.
Miranda is selfish.
Matthew is not angry.
Matthew is not pink.
Silvia is puny.
Lauren is selfish.
Silvia is not accurate.
Silvia is pink.
Basil is not accurate.If someone is selfish, then he is both angry and pink.
If someone is not puny or selfish, then he is not accurate.
Someone is accurate and not selfish if and only if he is puny.
Basil is not lucky if and only if Phoebe is puny and Matthew is selfish.
If there is someone who is both selfish and angry, then Phoebe is not puny.
Miranda being not lucky is equivalent to Miranda being not pink.
If someone is accurate or selfish, then he is not puny.
If Silvia is not pink or Basil is not selfish, then Lauren is puny.
If there is at least one people who is either not lucky or selfish, then Silvia is not pink and Matthew is accurate.
If there is someone who is both accurate and not pink, then Gideon is not angry and Silvia is not lucky.
If Basil is lucky, then Matthew is accurate, and vice versa.
Miranda being angry implies that Lauren is not lucky and Lauren is puny. | Miranda is selfish. | entailment |
Phoebe is accurate.
Basil is not pink.
Miranda is pink.
Matthew is not accurate.
Miranda is selfish.
Matthew is not angry.
Matthew is not pink.
Silvia is puny.
Lauren is selfish.
Silvia is not accurate.
Silvia is pink.
Basil is not accurate.If someone is selfish, then he is both angry and pink.
If someone is not puny or selfish, then he is not accurate.
Someone is accurate and not selfish if and only if he is puny.
Basil is not lucky if and only if Phoebe is puny and Matthew is selfish.
If there is someone who is both selfish and angry, then Phoebe is not puny.
Miranda being not lucky is equivalent to Miranda being not pink.
If someone is accurate or selfish, then he is not puny.
If Silvia is not pink or Basil is not selfish, then Lauren is puny.
If there is at least one people who is either not lucky or selfish, then Silvia is not pink and Matthew is accurate.
If there is someone who is both accurate and not pink, then Gideon is not angry and Silvia is not lucky.
If Basil is lucky, then Matthew is accurate, and vice versa.
Miranda being angry implies that Lauren is not lucky and Lauren is puny. | Lauren is not angry. | contradiction |
Phoebe is accurate.
Basil is not pink.
Miranda is pink.
Matthew is not accurate.
Miranda is selfish.
Matthew is not angry.
Matthew is not pink.
Silvia is puny.
Lauren is selfish.
Silvia is not accurate.
Silvia is pink.
Basil is not accurate.If someone is selfish, then he is both angry and pink.
If someone is not puny or selfish, then he is not accurate.
Someone is accurate and not selfish if and only if he is puny.
Basil is not lucky if and only if Phoebe is puny and Matthew is selfish.
If there is someone who is both selfish and angry, then Phoebe is not puny.
Miranda being not lucky is equivalent to Miranda being not pink.
If someone is accurate or selfish, then he is not puny.
If Silvia is not pink or Basil is not selfish, then Lauren is puny.
If there is at least one people who is either not lucky or selfish, then Silvia is not pink and Matthew is accurate.
If there is someone who is both accurate and not pink, then Gideon is not angry and Silvia is not lucky.
If Basil is lucky, then Matthew is accurate, and vice versa.
Miranda being angry implies that Lauren is not lucky and Lauren is puny. | Phoebe is not accurate. | self_contradiction |
Phoebe is accurate.
Basil is not pink.
Miranda is pink.
Matthew is not accurate.
Miranda is selfish.
Matthew is not angry.
Matthew is not pink.
Silvia is puny.
Lauren is selfish.
Silvia is not accurate.
Silvia is pink.
Basil is not accurate.If someone is selfish, then he is both angry and pink.
If someone is not puny or selfish, then he is not accurate.
Someone is accurate and not selfish if and only if he is puny.
Basil is not lucky if and only if Phoebe is puny and Matthew is selfish.
If there is someone who is both selfish and angry, then Phoebe is not puny.
Miranda being not lucky is equivalent to Miranda being not pink.
If someone is accurate or selfish, then he is not puny.
If Silvia is not pink or Basil is not selfish, then Lauren is puny.
If there is at least one people who is either not lucky or selfish, then Silvia is not pink and Matthew is accurate.
If there is someone who is both accurate and not pink, then Gideon is not angry and Silvia is not lucky.
If Basil is lucky, then Matthew is accurate, and vice versa.
Miranda being angry implies that Lauren is not lucky and Lauren is puny. | Silvia is pink. | self_contradiction |
Phoebe is accurate.
Basil is not pink.
Miranda is pink.
Matthew is not accurate.
Miranda is selfish.
Matthew is not angry.
Matthew is not pink.
Silvia is puny.
Lauren is selfish.
Silvia is not accurate.
Silvia is pink.
Basil is not accurate.If someone is selfish, then he is both angry and pink.
If someone is not puny or selfish, then he is not accurate.
Someone is accurate and not selfish if and only if he is puny.
Basil is not lucky if and only if Phoebe is puny and Matthew is selfish.
If there is someone who is both selfish and angry, then Phoebe is not puny.
Miranda being not lucky is equivalent to Miranda being not pink.
If someone is accurate or selfish, then he is not puny.
If Silvia is not pink or Basil is not selfish, then Lauren is puny.
If there is at least one people who is either not lucky or selfish, then Silvia is not pink and Matthew is accurate.
If there is someone who is both accurate and not pink, then Gideon is not angry and Silvia is not lucky.
If Basil is lucky, then Matthew is accurate, and vice versa.
Miranda being angry implies that Lauren is not lucky and Lauren is puny. | Matthew is not puny. | entailment |
Phoebe is accurate.
Basil is not pink.
Miranda is pink.
Matthew is not accurate.
Miranda is selfish.
Matthew is not angry.
Matthew is not pink.
Silvia is puny.
Lauren is selfish.
Silvia is not accurate.
Silvia is pink.
Basil is not accurate.If someone is selfish, then he is both angry and pink.
If someone is not puny or selfish, then he is not accurate.
Someone is accurate and not selfish if and only if he is puny.
Basil is not lucky if and only if Phoebe is puny and Matthew is selfish.
If there is someone who is both selfish and angry, then Phoebe is not puny.
Miranda being not lucky is equivalent to Miranda being not pink.
If someone is accurate or selfish, then he is not puny.
If Silvia is not pink or Basil is not selfish, then Lauren is puny.
If there is at least one people who is either not lucky or selfish, then Silvia is not pink and Matthew is accurate.
If there is someone who is both accurate and not pink, then Gideon is not angry and Silvia is not lucky.
If Basil is lucky, then Matthew is accurate, and vice versa.
Miranda being angry implies that Lauren is not lucky and Lauren is puny. | Lauren is angry. | entailment |
Phoebe is accurate.
Basil is not pink.
Miranda is pink.
Matthew is not accurate.
Miranda is selfish.
Matthew is not angry.
Matthew is not pink.
Silvia is puny.
Lauren is selfish.
Silvia is not accurate.
Silvia is pink.
Basil is not accurate.If someone is selfish, then he is both angry and pink.
If someone is not puny or selfish, then he is not accurate.
Someone is accurate and not selfish if and only if he is puny.
Basil is not lucky if and only if Phoebe is puny and Matthew is selfish.
If there is someone who is both selfish and angry, then Phoebe is not puny.
Miranda being not lucky is equivalent to Miranda being not pink.
If someone is accurate or selfish, then he is not puny.
If Silvia is not pink or Basil is not selfish, then Lauren is puny.
If there is at least one people who is either not lucky or selfish, then Silvia is not pink and Matthew is accurate.
If there is someone who is both accurate and not pink, then Gideon is not angry and Silvia is not lucky.
If Basil is lucky, then Matthew is accurate, and vice versa.
Miranda being angry implies that Lauren is not lucky and Lauren is puny. | Miranda is not angry. | contradiction |
Phoebe is accurate.
Basil is not pink.
Miranda is pink.
Matthew is not accurate.
Miranda is selfish.
Matthew is not angry.
Matthew is not pink.
Silvia is puny.
Lauren is selfish.
Silvia is not accurate.
Silvia is pink.
Basil is not accurate.If someone is selfish, then he is both angry and pink.
If someone is not puny or selfish, then he is not accurate.
Someone is accurate and not selfish if and only if he is puny.
Basil is not lucky if and only if Phoebe is puny and Matthew is selfish.
If there is someone who is both selfish and angry, then Phoebe is not puny.
Miranda being not lucky is equivalent to Miranda being not pink.
If someone is accurate or selfish, then he is not puny.
If Silvia is not pink or Basil is not selfish, then Lauren is puny.
If there is at least one people who is either not lucky or selfish, then Silvia is not pink and Matthew is accurate.
If there is someone who is both accurate and not pink, then Gideon is not angry and Silvia is not lucky.
If Basil is lucky, then Matthew is accurate, and vice versa.
Miranda being angry implies that Lauren is not lucky and Lauren is puny. | Matthew is not pink. | entailment |
Phoebe is accurate.
Basil is not pink.
Miranda is pink.
Matthew is not accurate.
Miranda is selfish.
Matthew is not angry.
Matthew is not pink.
Silvia is puny.
Lauren is selfish.
Silvia is not accurate.
Silvia is pink.
Basil is not accurate.If someone is selfish, then he is both angry and pink.
If someone is not puny or selfish, then he is not accurate.
Someone is accurate and not selfish if and only if he is puny.
Basil is not lucky if and only if Phoebe is puny and Matthew is selfish.
If there is someone who is both selfish and angry, then Phoebe is not puny.
Miranda being not lucky is equivalent to Miranda being not pink.
If someone is accurate or selfish, then he is not puny.
If Silvia is not pink or Basil is not selfish, then Lauren is puny.
If there is at least one people who is either not lucky or selfish, then Silvia is not pink and Matthew is accurate.
If there is someone who is both accurate and not pink, then Gideon is not angry and Silvia is not lucky.
If Basil is lucky, then Matthew is accurate, and vice versa.
Miranda being angry implies that Lauren is not lucky and Lauren is puny. | Silvia is not lucky. | neutral |
Phoebe is accurate.
Basil is not pink.
Miranda is pink.
Matthew is not accurate.
Miranda is selfish.
Matthew is not angry.
Matthew is not pink.
Silvia is puny.
Lauren is selfish.
Silvia is not accurate.
Silvia is pink.
Basil is not accurate.If someone is selfish, then he is both angry and pink.
If someone is not puny or selfish, then he is not accurate.
Someone is accurate and not selfish if and only if he is puny.
Basil is not lucky if and only if Phoebe is puny and Matthew is selfish.
If there is someone who is both selfish and angry, then Phoebe is not puny.
Miranda being not lucky is equivalent to Miranda being not pink.
If someone is accurate or selfish, then he is not puny.
If Silvia is not pink or Basil is not selfish, then Lauren is puny.
If there is at least one people who is either not lucky or selfish, then Silvia is not pink and Matthew is accurate.
If there is someone who is both accurate and not pink, then Gideon is not angry and Silvia is not lucky.
If Basil is lucky, then Matthew is accurate, and vice versa.
Miranda being angry implies that Lauren is not lucky and Lauren is puny. | Gideon is not angry. | neutral |
Phoebe is accurate.
Basil is not pink.
Miranda is pink.
Matthew is not accurate.
Miranda is selfish.
Matthew is not angry.
Matthew is not pink.
Silvia is puny.
Lauren is selfish.
Silvia is not accurate.
Silvia is pink.
Basil is not accurate.If someone is selfish, then he is both angry and pink.
If someone is not puny or selfish, then he is not accurate.
Someone is accurate and not selfish if and only if he is puny.
Basil is not lucky if and only if Phoebe is puny and Matthew is selfish.
If there is someone who is both selfish and angry, then Phoebe is not puny.
Miranda being not lucky is equivalent to Miranda being not pink.
If someone is accurate or selfish, then he is not puny.
If Silvia is not pink or Basil is not selfish, then Lauren is puny.
If there is at least one people who is either not lucky or selfish, then Silvia is not pink and Matthew is accurate.
If there is someone who is both accurate and not pink, then Gideon is not angry and Silvia is not lucky.
If Basil is lucky, then Matthew is accurate, and vice versa.
Miranda being angry implies that Lauren is not lucky and Lauren is puny. | Matthew is puny. | contradiction |
Phoebe is accurate.
Basil is not pink.
Miranda is pink.
Matthew is not accurate.
Miranda is selfish.
Matthew is not angry.
Matthew is not pink.
Silvia is puny.
Lauren is selfish.
Silvia is not accurate.
Silvia is pink.
Basil is not accurate.If someone is selfish, then he is both angry and pink.
If someone is not puny or selfish, then he is not accurate.
Someone is accurate and not selfish if and only if he is puny.
Basil is not lucky if and only if Phoebe is puny and Matthew is selfish.
If there is someone who is both selfish and angry, then Phoebe is not puny.
Miranda being not lucky is equivalent to Miranda being not pink.
If someone is accurate or selfish, then he is not puny.
If Silvia is not pink or Basil is not selfish, then Lauren is puny.
If there is at least one people who is either not lucky or selfish, then Silvia is not pink and Matthew is accurate.
If there is someone who is both accurate and not pink, then Gideon is not angry and Silvia is not lucky.
If Basil is lucky, then Matthew is accurate, and vice versa.
Miranda being angry implies that Lauren is not lucky and Lauren is puny. | Gideon is not lucky. | neutral |
Phoebe is accurate.
Basil is not pink.
Miranda is pink.
Matthew is not accurate.
Miranda is selfish.
Matthew is not angry.
Matthew is not pink.
Silvia is puny.
Lauren is selfish.
Silvia is not accurate.
Silvia is pink.
Basil is not accurate.If someone is selfish, then he is both angry and pink.
If someone is not puny or selfish, then he is not accurate.
Someone is accurate and not selfish if and only if he is puny.
Basil is not lucky if and only if Phoebe is puny and Matthew is selfish.
If there is someone who is both selfish and angry, then Phoebe is not puny.
Miranda being not lucky is equivalent to Miranda being not pink.
If someone is accurate or selfish, then he is not puny.
If Silvia is not pink or Basil is not selfish, then Lauren is puny.
If there is at least one people who is either not lucky or selfish, then Silvia is not pink and Matthew is accurate.
If there is someone who is both accurate and not pink, then Gideon is not angry and Silvia is not lucky.
If Basil is lucky, then Matthew is accurate, and vice versa.
Miranda being angry implies that Lauren is not lucky and Lauren is puny. | Phoebe is not selfish. | neutral |
Phoebe is accurate.
Basil is not pink.
Miranda is pink.
Matthew is not accurate.
Miranda is selfish.
Matthew is not angry.
Matthew is not pink.
Silvia is puny.
Lauren is selfish.
Silvia is not accurate.
Silvia is pink.
Basil is not accurate.If someone is selfish, then he is both angry and pink.
If someone is not puny or selfish, then he is not accurate.
Someone is accurate and not selfish if and only if he is puny.
Basil is not lucky if and only if Phoebe is puny and Matthew is selfish.
If there is someone who is both selfish and angry, then Phoebe is not puny.
Miranda being not lucky is equivalent to Miranda being not pink.
If someone is accurate or selfish, then he is not puny.
If Silvia is not pink or Basil is not selfish, then Lauren is puny.
If there is at least one people who is either not lucky or selfish, then Silvia is not pink and Matthew is accurate.
If there is someone who is both accurate and not pink, then Gideon is not angry and Silvia is not lucky.
If Basil is lucky, then Matthew is accurate, and vice versa.
Miranda being angry implies that Lauren is not lucky and Lauren is puny. | Phoebe is accurate. | self_contradiction |
Phoebe is accurate.
Basil is not pink.
Miranda is pink.
Matthew is not accurate.
Miranda is selfish.
Matthew is not angry.
Matthew is not pink.
Silvia is puny.
Lauren is selfish.
Silvia is not accurate.
Silvia is pink.
Basil is not accurate.If someone is selfish, then he is both angry and pink.
If someone is not puny or selfish, then he is not accurate.
Someone is accurate and not selfish if and only if he is puny.
Basil is not lucky if and only if Phoebe is puny and Matthew is selfish.
If there is someone who is both selfish and angry, then Phoebe is not puny.
Miranda being not lucky is equivalent to Miranda being not pink.
If someone is accurate or selfish, then he is not puny.
If Silvia is not pink or Basil is not selfish, then Lauren is puny.
If there is at least one people who is either not lucky or selfish, then Silvia is not pink and Matthew is accurate.
If there is someone who is both accurate and not pink, then Gideon is not angry and Silvia is not lucky.
If Basil is lucky, then Matthew is accurate, and vice versa.
Miranda being angry implies that Lauren is not lucky and Lauren is puny. | Phoebe is puny. | contradiction |
Phoebe is accurate.
Basil is not pink.
Miranda is pink.
Matthew is not accurate.
Miranda is selfish.
Matthew is not angry.
Matthew is not pink.
Silvia is puny.
Lauren is selfish.
Silvia is not accurate.
Silvia is pink.
Basil is not accurate.If someone is selfish, then he is both angry and pink.
If someone is not puny or selfish, then he is not accurate.
Someone is accurate and not selfish if and only if he is puny.
Basil is not lucky if and only if Phoebe is puny and Matthew is selfish.
If there is someone who is both selfish and angry, then Phoebe is not puny.
Miranda being not lucky is equivalent to Miranda being not pink.
If someone is accurate or selfish, then he is not puny.
If Silvia is not pink or Basil is not selfish, then Lauren is puny.
If there is at least one people who is either not lucky or selfish, then Silvia is not pink and Matthew is accurate.
If there is someone who is both accurate and not pink, then Gideon is not angry and Silvia is not lucky.
If Basil is lucky, then Matthew is accurate, and vice versa.
Miranda being angry implies that Lauren is not lucky and Lauren is puny. | Silvia is puny. | self_contradiction |
Phoebe is accurate.
Basil is not pink.
Miranda is pink.
Matthew is not accurate.
Miranda is selfish.
Matthew is not angry.
Matthew is not pink.
Silvia is puny.
Lauren is selfish.
Silvia is not accurate.
Silvia is pink.
Basil is not accurate.If someone is selfish, then he is both angry and pink.
If someone is not puny or selfish, then he is not accurate.
Someone is accurate and not selfish if and only if he is puny.
Basil is not lucky if and only if Phoebe is puny and Matthew is selfish.
If there is someone who is both selfish and angry, then Phoebe is not puny.
Miranda being not lucky is equivalent to Miranda being not pink.
If someone is accurate or selfish, then he is not puny.
If Silvia is not pink or Basil is not selfish, then Lauren is puny.
If there is at least one people who is either not lucky or selfish, then Silvia is not pink and Matthew is accurate.
If there is someone who is both accurate and not pink, then Gideon is not angry and Silvia is not lucky.
If Basil is lucky, then Matthew is accurate, and vice versa.
Miranda being angry implies that Lauren is not lucky and Lauren is puny. | Silvia is not selfish. | entailment |
Phoebe is accurate.
Basil is not pink.
Miranda is pink.
Matthew is not accurate.
Miranda is selfish.
Matthew is not angry.
Matthew is not pink.
Silvia is puny.
Lauren is selfish.
Silvia is not accurate.
Silvia is pink.
Basil is not accurate.If someone is selfish, then he is both angry and pink.
If someone is not puny or selfish, then he is not accurate.
Someone is accurate and not selfish if and only if he is puny.
Basil is not lucky if and only if Phoebe is puny and Matthew is selfish.
If there is someone who is both selfish and angry, then Phoebe is not puny.
Miranda being not lucky is equivalent to Miranda being not pink.
If someone is accurate or selfish, then he is not puny.
If Silvia is not pink or Basil is not selfish, then Lauren is puny.
If there is at least one people who is either not lucky or selfish, then Silvia is not pink and Matthew is accurate.
If there is someone who is both accurate and not pink, then Gideon is not angry and Silvia is not lucky.
If Basil is lucky, then Matthew is accurate, and vice versa.
Miranda being angry implies that Lauren is not lucky and Lauren is puny. | Silvia is accurate. | self_contradiction |
Phoebe is accurate.
Basil is not pink.
Miranda is pink.
Matthew is not accurate.
Miranda is selfish.
Matthew is not angry.
Matthew is not pink.
Silvia is puny.
Lauren is selfish.
Silvia is not accurate.
Silvia is pink.
Basil is not accurate.If someone is selfish, then he is both angry and pink.
If someone is not puny or selfish, then he is not accurate.
Someone is accurate and not selfish if and only if he is puny.
Basil is not lucky if and only if Phoebe is puny and Matthew is selfish.
If there is someone who is both selfish and angry, then Phoebe is not puny.
Miranda being not lucky is equivalent to Miranda being not pink.
If someone is accurate or selfish, then he is not puny.
If Silvia is not pink or Basil is not selfish, then Lauren is puny.
If there is at least one people who is either not lucky or selfish, then Silvia is not pink and Matthew is accurate.
If there is someone who is both accurate and not pink, then Gideon is not angry and Silvia is not lucky.
If Basil is lucky, then Matthew is accurate, and vice versa.
Miranda being angry implies that Lauren is not lucky and Lauren is puny. | Basil is not angry. | neutral |
Phoebe is accurate.
Basil is not pink.
Miranda is pink.
Matthew is not accurate.
Miranda is selfish.
Matthew is not angry.
Matthew is not pink.
Silvia is puny.
Lauren is selfish.
Silvia is not accurate.
Silvia is pink.
Basil is not accurate.If someone is selfish, then he is both angry and pink.
If someone is not puny or selfish, then he is not accurate.
Someone is accurate and not selfish if and only if he is puny.
Basil is not lucky if and only if Phoebe is puny and Matthew is selfish.
If there is someone who is both selfish and angry, then Phoebe is not puny.
Miranda being not lucky is equivalent to Miranda being not pink.
If someone is accurate or selfish, then he is not puny.
If Silvia is not pink or Basil is not selfish, then Lauren is puny.
If there is at least one people who is either not lucky or selfish, then Silvia is not pink and Matthew is accurate.
If there is someone who is both accurate and not pink, then Gideon is not angry and Silvia is not lucky.
If Basil is lucky, then Matthew is accurate, and vice versa.
Miranda being angry implies that Lauren is not lucky and Lauren is puny. | Matthew is angry. | contradiction |
Janet is vivacious.
Gilbert is not visible.
Milton is vivacious.
Gilbert is blue-eyed.
Gilbert is vivacious.
Deborah is not crazy.
Milton is not massive.
Deborah is not happy.
Chandler is not crazy.
Milton is visible.
Janet is crazy.
Lionel is vivacious.Someone who is crazy is always both not happy and not massive.
Someone being both crazy and not happy is equivalent to being not blue-eyed and visible.
If there is at least one people who is happy or visible, then Janet is not massive.
Someone who is eithor not visible or massive is always not happy.
if there is at least one people who is not happy and not blue-eyed, then Chandler is not visible and Chandler is not crazy.
Milton is not crazy if and only if Milton is massive and Chandler is not vivacious.
Someone being both crazy and not vivacious is equivalent to being blue-eyed.
Tommy is not visible if and only if Deborah is not massive.
Someone who is not massive or crazy is always happy and not visible.
If there is at least one people who is not visible or massive, then Lionel is crazy.
It can be concluded that Janet is happy and Deborah is crazy once knowing that Gilbert is blue-eyed.
Someone is vivacious if and only if he is happy. | Chandler is not massive. | neutral |
Janet is vivacious.
Gilbert is not visible.
Milton is vivacious.
Gilbert is blue-eyed.
Gilbert is vivacious.
Deborah is not crazy.
Milton is not massive.
Deborah is not happy.
Chandler is not crazy.
Milton is visible.
Janet is crazy.
Lionel is vivacious.Someone who is crazy is always both not happy and not massive.
Someone being both crazy and not happy is equivalent to being not blue-eyed and visible.
If there is at least one people who is happy or visible, then Janet is not massive.
Someone who is eithor not visible or massive is always not happy.
if there is at least one people who is not happy and not blue-eyed, then Chandler is not visible and Chandler is not crazy.
Milton is not crazy if and only if Milton is massive and Chandler is not vivacious.
Someone being both crazy and not vivacious is equivalent to being blue-eyed.
Tommy is not visible if and only if Deborah is not massive.
Someone who is not massive or crazy is always happy and not visible.
If there is at least one people who is not visible or massive, then Lionel is crazy.
It can be concluded that Janet is happy and Deborah is crazy once knowing that Gilbert is blue-eyed.
Someone is vivacious if and only if he is happy. | Lionel is not blue-eyed. | entailment |
Janet is vivacious.
Gilbert is not visible.
Milton is vivacious.
Gilbert is blue-eyed.
Gilbert is vivacious.
Deborah is not crazy.
Milton is not massive.
Deborah is not happy.
Chandler is not crazy.
Milton is visible.
Janet is crazy.
Lionel is vivacious.Someone who is crazy is always both not happy and not massive.
Someone being both crazy and not happy is equivalent to being not blue-eyed and visible.
If there is at least one people who is happy or visible, then Janet is not massive.
Someone who is eithor not visible or massive is always not happy.
if there is at least one people who is not happy and not blue-eyed, then Chandler is not visible and Chandler is not crazy.
Milton is not crazy if and only if Milton is massive and Chandler is not vivacious.
Someone being both crazy and not vivacious is equivalent to being blue-eyed.
Tommy is not visible if and only if Deborah is not massive.
Someone who is not massive or crazy is always happy and not visible.
If there is at least one people who is not visible or massive, then Lionel is crazy.
It can be concluded that Janet is happy and Deborah is crazy once knowing that Gilbert is blue-eyed.
Someone is vivacious if and only if he is happy. | Lionel is not crazy. | contradiction |
Janet is vivacious.
Gilbert is not visible.
Milton is vivacious.
Gilbert is blue-eyed.
Gilbert is vivacious.
Deborah is not crazy.
Milton is not massive.
Deborah is not happy.
Chandler is not crazy.
Milton is visible.
Janet is crazy.
Lionel is vivacious.Someone who is crazy is always both not happy and not massive.
Someone being both crazy and not happy is equivalent to being not blue-eyed and visible.
If there is at least one people who is happy or visible, then Janet is not massive.
Someone who is eithor not visible or massive is always not happy.
if there is at least one people who is not happy and not blue-eyed, then Chandler is not visible and Chandler is not crazy.
Milton is not crazy if and only if Milton is massive and Chandler is not vivacious.
Someone being both crazy and not vivacious is equivalent to being blue-eyed.
Tommy is not visible if and only if Deborah is not massive.
Someone who is not massive or crazy is always happy and not visible.
If there is at least one people who is not visible or massive, then Lionel is crazy.
It can be concluded that Janet is happy and Deborah is crazy once knowing that Gilbert is blue-eyed.
Someone is vivacious if and only if he is happy. | Lionel is not massive. | entailment |
Janet is vivacious.
Gilbert is not visible.
Milton is vivacious.
Gilbert is blue-eyed.
Gilbert is vivacious.
Deborah is not crazy.
Milton is not massive.
Deborah is not happy.
Chandler is not crazy.
Milton is visible.
Janet is crazy.
Lionel is vivacious.Someone who is crazy is always both not happy and not massive.
Someone being both crazy and not happy is equivalent to being not blue-eyed and visible.
If there is at least one people who is happy or visible, then Janet is not massive.
Someone who is eithor not visible or massive is always not happy.
if there is at least one people who is not happy and not blue-eyed, then Chandler is not visible and Chandler is not crazy.
Milton is not crazy if and only if Milton is massive and Chandler is not vivacious.
Someone being both crazy and not vivacious is equivalent to being blue-eyed.
Tommy is not visible if and only if Deborah is not massive.
Someone who is not massive or crazy is always happy and not visible.
If there is at least one people who is not visible or massive, then Lionel is crazy.
It can be concluded that Janet is happy and Deborah is crazy once knowing that Gilbert is blue-eyed.
Someone is vivacious if and only if he is happy. | Janet is massive. | contradiction |
Janet is vivacious.
Gilbert is not visible.
Milton is vivacious.
Gilbert is blue-eyed.
Gilbert is vivacious.
Deborah is not crazy.
Milton is not massive.
Deborah is not happy.
Chandler is not crazy.
Milton is visible.
Janet is crazy.
Lionel is vivacious.Someone who is crazy is always both not happy and not massive.
Someone being both crazy and not happy is equivalent to being not blue-eyed and visible.
If there is at least one people who is happy or visible, then Janet is not massive.
Someone who is eithor not visible or massive is always not happy.
if there is at least one people who is not happy and not blue-eyed, then Chandler is not visible and Chandler is not crazy.
Milton is not crazy if and only if Milton is massive and Chandler is not vivacious.
Someone being both crazy and not vivacious is equivalent to being blue-eyed.
Tommy is not visible if and only if Deborah is not massive.
Someone who is not massive or crazy is always happy and not visible.
If there is at least one people who is not visible or massive, then Lionel is crazy.
It can be concluded that Janet is happy and Deborah is crazy once knowing that Gilbert is blue-eyed.
Someone is vivacious if and only if he is happy. | Chandler is not crazy. | entailment |
Janet is vivacious.
Gilbert is not visible.
Milton is vivacious.
Gilbert is blue-eyed.
Gilbert is vivacious.
Deborah is not crazy.
Milton is not massive.
Deborah is not happy.
Chandler is not crazy.
Milton is visible.
Janet is crazy.
Lionel is vivacious.Someone who is crazy is always both not happy and not massive.
Someone being both crazy and not happy is equivalent to being not blue-eyed and visible.
If there is at least one people who is happy or visible, then Janet is not massive.
Someone who is eithor not visible or massive is always not happy.
if there is at least one people who is not happy and not blue-eyed, then Chandler is not visible and Chandler is not crazy.
Milton is not crazy if and only if Milton is massive and Chandler is not vivacious.
Someone being both crazy and not vivacious is equivalent to being blue-eyed.
Tommy is not visible if and only if Deborah is not massive.
Someone who is not massive or crazy is always happy and not visible.
If there is at least one people who is not visible or massive, then Lionel is crazy.
It can be concluded that Janet is happy and Deborah is crazy once knowing that Gilbert is blue-eyed.
Someone is vivacious if and only if he is happy. | Gilbert is not crazy. | contradiction |
Janet is vivacious.
Gilbert is not visible.
Milton is vivacious.
Gilbert is blue-eyed.
Gilbert is vivacious.
Deborah is not crazy.
Milton is not massive.
Deborah is not happy.
Chandler is not crazy.
Milton is visible.
Janet is crazy.
Lionel is vivacious.Someone who is crazy is always both not happy and not massive.
Someone being both crazy and not happy is equivalent to being not blue-eyed and visible.
If there is at least one people who is happy or visible, then Janet is not massive.
Someone who is eithor not visible or massive is always not happy.
if there is at least one people who is not happy and not blue-eyed, then Chandler is not visible and Chandler is not crazy.
Milton is not crazy if and only if Milton is massive and Chandler is not vivacious.
Someone being both crazy and not vivacious is equivalent to being blue-eyed.
Tommy is not visible if and only if Deborah is not massive.
Someone who is not massive or crazy is always happy and not visible.
If there is at least one people who is not visible or massive, then Lionel is crazy.
It can be concluded that Janet is happy and Deborah is crazy once knowing that Gilbert is blue-eyed.
Someone is vivacious if and only if he is happy. | Tommy is visible. | contradiction |
Janet is vivacious.
Gilbert is not visible.
Milton is vivacious.
Gilbert is blue-eyed.
Gilbert is vivacious.
Deborah is not crazy.
Milton is not massive.
Deborah is not happy.
Chandler is not crazy.
Milton is visible.
Janet is crazy.
Lionel is vivacious.Someone who is crazy is always both not happy and not massive.
Someone being both crazy and not happy is equivalent to being not blue-eyed and visible.
If there is at least one people who is happy or visible, then Janet is not massive.
Someone who is eithor not visible or massive is always not happy.
if there is at least one people who is not happy and not blue-eyed, then Chandler is not visible and Chandler is not crazy.
Milton is not crazy if and only if Milton is massive and Chandler is not vivacious.
Someone being both crazy and not vivacious is equivalent to being blue-eyed.
Tommy is not visible if and only if Deborah is not massive.
Someone who is not massive or crazy is always happy and not visible.
If there is at least one people who is not visible or massive, then Lionel is crazy.
It can be concluded that Janet is happy and Deborah is crazy once knowing that Gilbert is blue-eyed.
Someone is vivacious if and only if he is happy. | Gilbert is not happy. | self_contradiction |
Janet is vivacious.
Gilbert is not visible.
Milton is vivacious.
Gilbert is blue-eyed.
Gilbert is vivacious.
Deborah is not crazy.
Milton is not massive.
Deborah is not happy.
Chandler is not crazy.
Milton is visible.
Janet is crazy.
Lionel is vivacious.Someone who is crazy is always both not happy and not massive.
Someone being both crazy and not happy is equivalent to being not blue-eyed and visible.
If there is at least one people who is happy or visible, then Janet is not massive.
Someone who is eithor not visible or massive is always not happy.
if there is at least one people who is not happy and not blue-eyed, then Chandler is not visible and Chandler is not crazy.
Milton is not crazy if and only if Milton is massive and Chandler is not vivacious.
Someone being both crazy and not vivacious is equivalent to being blue-eyed.
Tommy is not visible if and only if Deborah is not massive.
Someone who is not massive or crazy is always happy and not visible.
If there is at least one people who is not visible or massive, then Lionel is crazy.
It can be concluded that Janet is happy and Deborah is crazy once knowing that Gilbert is blue-eyed.
Someone is vivacious if and only if he is happy. | Tommy is crazy. | neutral |
Janet is vivacious.
Gilbert is not visible.
Milton is vivacious.
Gilbert is blue-eyed.
Gilbert is vivacious.
Deborah is not crazy.
Milton is not massive.
Deborah is not happy.
Chandler is not crazy.
Milton is visible.
Janet is crazy.
Lionel is vivacious.Someone who is crazy is always both not happy and not massive.
Someone being both crazy and not happy is equivalent to being not blue-eyed and visible.
If there is at least one people who is happy or visible, then Janet is not massive.
Someone who is eithor not visible or massive is always not happy.
if there is at least one people who is not happy and not blue-eyed, then Chandler is not visible and Chandler is not crazy.
Milton is not crazy if and only if Milton is massive and Chandler is not vivacious.
Someone being both crazy and not vivacious is equivalent to being blue-eyed.
Tommy is not visible if and only if Deborah is not massive.
Someone who is not massive or crazy is always happy and not visible.
If there is at least one people who is not visible or massive, then Lionel is crazy.
It can be concluded that Janet is happy and Deborah is crazy once knowing that Gilbert is blue-eyed.
Someone is vivacious if and only if he is happy. | Milton is not crazy. | neutral |
Janet is vivacious.
Gilbert is not visible.
Milton is vivacious.
Gilbert is blue-eyed.
Gilbert is vivacious.
Deborah is not crazy.
Milton is not massive.
Deborah is not happy.
Chandler is not crazy.
Milton is visible.
Janet is crazy.
Lionel is vivacious.Someone who is crazy is always both not happy and not massive.
Someone being both crazy and not happy is equivalent to being not blue-eyed and visible.
If there is at least one people who is happy or visible, then Janet is not massive.
Someone who is eithor not visible or massive is always not happy.
if there is at least one people who is not happy and not blue-eyed, then Chandler is not visible and Chandler is not crazy.
Milton is not crazy if and only if Milton is massive and Chandler is not vivacious.
Someone being both crazy and not vivacious is equivalent to being blue-eyed.
Tommy is not visible if and only if Deborah is not massive.
Someone who is not massive or crazy is always happy and not visible.
If there is at least one people who is not visible or massive, then Lionel is crazy.
It can be concluded that Janet is happy and Deborah is crazy once knowing that Gilbert is blue-eyed.
Someone is vivacious if and only if he is happy. | Milton is not blue-eyed. | neutral |
Janet is vivacious.
Gilbert is not visible.
Milton is vivacious.
Gilbert is blue-eyed.
Gilbert is vivacious.
Deborah is not crazy.
Milton is not massive.
Deborah is not happy.
Chandler is not crazy.
Milton is visible.
Janet is crazy.
Lionel is vivacious.Someone who is crazy is always both not happy and not massive.
Someone being both crazy and not happy is equivalent to being not blue-eyed and visible.
If there is at least one people who is happy or visible, then Janet is not massive.
Someone who is eithor not visible or massive is always not happy.
if there is at least one people who is not happy and not blue-eyed, then Chandler is not visible and Chandler is not crazy.
Milton is not crazy if and only if Milton is massive and Chandler is not vivacious.
Someone being both crazy and not vivacious is equivalent to being blue-eyed.
Tommy is not visible if and only if Deborah is not massive.
Someone who is not massive or crazy is always happy and not visible.
If there is at least one people who is not visible or massive, then Lionel is crazy.
It can be concluded that Janet is happy and Deborah is crazy once knowing that Gilbert is blue-eyed.
Someone is vivacious if and only if he is happy. | Janet is happy. | self_contradiction |
Janet is vivacious.
Gilbert is not visible.
Milton is vivacious.
Gilbert is blue-eyed.
Gilbert is vivacious.
Deborah is not crazy.
Milton is not massive.
Deborah is not happy.
Chandler is not crazy.
Milton is visible.
Janet is crazy.
Lionel is vivacious.Someone who is crazy is always both not happy and not massive.
Someone being both crazy and not happy is equivalent to being not blue-eyed and visible.
If there is at least one people who is happy or visible, then Janet is not massive.
Someone who is eithor not visible or massive is always not happy.
if there is at least one people who is not happy and not blue-eyed, then Chandler is not visible and Chandler is not crazy.
Milton is not crazy if and only if Milton is massive and Chandler is not vivacious.
Someone being both crazy and not vivacious is equivalent to being blue-eyed.
Tommy is not visible if and only if Deborah is not massive.
Someone who is not massive or crazy is always happy and not visible.
If there is at least one people who is not visible or massive, then Lionel is crazy.
It can be concluded that Janet is happy and Deborah is crazy once knowing that Gilbert is blue-eyed.
Someone is vivacious if and only if he is happy. | Lionel is crazy. | entailment |
Janet is vivacious.
Gilbert is not visible.
Milton is vivacious.
Gilbert is blue-eyed.
Gilbert is vivacious.
Deborah is not crazy.
Milton is not massive.
Deborah is not happy.
Chandler is not crazy.
Milton is visible.
Janet is crazy.
Lionel is vivacious.Someone who is crazy is always both not happy and not massive.
Someone being both crazy and not happy is equivalent to being not blue-eyed and visible.
If there is at least one people who is happy or visible, then Janet is not massive.
Someone who is eithor not visible or massive is always not happy.
if there is at least one people who is not happy and not blue-eyed, then Chandler is not visible and Chandler is not crazy.
Milton is not crazy if and only if Milton is massive and Chandler is not vivacious.
Someone being both crazy and not vivacious is equivalent to being blue-eyed.
Tommy is not visible if and only if Deborah is not massive.
Someone who is not massive or crazy is always happy and not visible.
If there is at least one people who is not visible or massive, then Lionel is crazy.
It can be concluded that Janet is happy and Deborah is crazy once knowing that Gilbert is blue-eyed.
Someone is vivacious if and only if he is happy. | Deborah is crazy. | self_contradiction |
Janet is vivacious.
Gilbert is not visible.
Milton is vivacious.
Gilbert is blue-eyed.
Gilbert is vivacious.
Deborah is not crazy.
Milton is not massive.
Deborah is not happy.
Chandler is not crazy.
Milton is visible.
Janet is crazy.
Lionel is vivacious.Someone who is crazy is always both not happy and not massive.
Someone being both crazy and not happy is equivalent to being not blue-eyed and visible.
If there is at least one people who is happy or visible, then Janet is not massive.
Someone who is eithor not visible or massive is always not happy.
if there is at least one people who is not happy and not blue-eyed, then Chandler is not visible and Chandler is not crazy.
Milton is not crazy if and only if Milton is massive and Chandler is not vivacious.
Someone being both crazy and not vivacious is equivalent to being blue-eyed.
Tommy is not visible if and only if Deborah is not massive.
Someone who is not massive or crazy is always happy and not visible.
If there is at least one people who is not visible or massive, then Lionel is crazy.
It can be concluded that Janet is happy and Deborah is crazy once knowing that Gilbert is blue-eyed.
Someone is vivacious if and only if he is happy. | Janet is not crazy. | contradiction |
Janet is vivacious.
Gilbert is not visible.
Milton is vivacious.
Gilbert is blue-eyed.
Gilbert is vivacious.
Deborah is not crazy.
Milton is not massive.
Deborah is not happy.
Chandler is not crazy.
Milton is visible.
Janet is crazy.
Lionel is vivacious.Someone who is crazy is always both not happy and not massive.
Someone being both crazy and not happy is equivalent to being not blue-eyed and visible.
If there is at least one people who is happy or visible, then Janet is not massive.
Someone who is eithor not visible or massive is always not happy.
if there is at least one people who is not happy and not blue-eyed, then Chandler is not visible and Chandler is not crazy.
Milton is not crazy if and only if Milton is massive and Chandler is not vivacious.
Someone being both crazy and not vivacious is equivalent to being blue-eyed.
Tommy is not visible if and only if Deborah is not massive.
Someone who is not massive or crazy is always happy and not visible.
If there is at least one people who is not visible or massive, then Lionel is crazy.
It can be concluded that Janet is happy and Deborah is crazy once knowing that Gilbert is blue-eyed.
Someone is vivacious if and only if he is happy. | Gilbert is not vivacious. | self_contradiction |
Janet is vivacious.
Gilbert is not visible.
Milton is vivacious.
Gilbert is blue-eyed.
Gilbert is vivacious.
Deborah is not crazy.
Milton is not massive.
Deborah is not happy.
Chandler is not crazy.
Milton is visible.
Janet is crazy.
Lionel is vivacious.Someone who is crazy is always both not happy and not massive.
Someone being both crazy and not happy is equivalent to being not blue-eyed and visible.
If there is at least one people who is happy or visible, then Janet is not massive.
Someone who is eithor not visible or massive is always not happy.
if there is at least one people who is not happy and not blue-eyed, then Chandler is not visible and Chandler is not crazy.
Milton is not crazy if and only if Milton is massive and Chandler is not vivacious.
Someone being both crazy and not vivacious is equivalent to being blue-eyed.
Tommy is not visible if and only if Deborah is not massive.
Someone who is not massive or crazy is always happy and not visible.
If there is at least one people who is not visible or massive, then Lionel is crazy.
It can be concluded that Janet is happy and Deborah is crazy once knowing that Gilbert is blue-eyed.
Someone is vivacious if and only if he is happy. | Deborah is not crazy. | self_contradiction |
Janet is vivacious.
Gilbert is not visible.
Milton is vivacious.
Gilbert is blue-eyed.
Gilbert is vivacious.
Deborah is not crazy.
Milton is not massive.
Deborah is not happy.
Chandler is not crazy.
Milton is visible.
Janet is crazy.
Lionel is vivacious.Someone who is crazy is always both not happy and not massive.
Someone being both crazy and not happy is equivalent to being not blue-eyed and visible.
If there is at least one people who is happy or visible, then Janet is not massive.
Someone who is eithor not visible or massive is always not happy.
if there is at least one people who is not happy and not blue-eyed, then Chandler is not visible and Chandler is not crazy.
Milton is not crazy if and only if Milton is massive and Chandler is not vivacious.
Someone being both crazy and not vivacious is equivalent to being blue-eyed.
Tommy is not visible if and only if Deborah is not massive.
Someone who is not massive or crazy is always happy and not visible.
If there is at least one people who is not visible or massive, then Lionel is crazy.
It can be concluded that Janet is happy and Deborah is crazy once knowing that Gilbert is blue-eyed.
Someone is vivacious if and only if he is happy. | Milton is not massive. | entailment |
Janet is vivacious.
Gilbert is not visible.
Milton is vivacious.
Gilbert is blue-eyed.
Gilbert is vivacious.
Deborah is not crazy.
Milton is not massive.
Deborah is not happy.
Chandler is not crazy.
Milton is visible.
Janet is crazy.
Lionel is vivacious.Someone who is crazy is always both not happy and not massive.
Someone being both crazy and not happy is equivalent to being not blue-eyed and visible.
If there is at least one people who is happy or visible, then Janet is not massive.
Someone who is eithor not visible or massive is always not happy.
if there is at least one people who is not happy and not blue-eyed, then Chandler is not visible and Chandler is not crazy.
Milton is not crazy if and only if Milton is massive and Chandler is not vivacious.
Someone being both crazy and not vivacious is equivalent to being blue-eyed.
Tommy is not visible if and only if Deborah is not massive.
Someone who is not massive or crazy is always happy and not visible.
If there is at least one people who is not visible or massive, then Lionel is crazy.
It can be concluded that Janet is happy and Deborah is crazy once knowing that Gilbert is blue-eyed.
Someone is vivacious if and only if he is happy. | Tommy is not blue-eyed. | neutral |
Lane is not concerned.
Baldwin is creepy.
Sean is important.
Lee is plain.
Aubrey is not successful.
Lane is bloody.
Aubrey is plain.
Ted is not bloody.
Lane is creepy.
Aubrey is not creepy.
Sean is not successful.
Ted is not concerned.If there is at least one people who is both not successful and plain, then Baldwin is not concerned.
If Baldwin is not creepy, then Ted is not successful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not important, then Aubrey is not creepy.
If there is at least one people who is creepy, then Lane is successful.
If Lee is creepy and Lee is successful, then Lee is concerned.
It can be concluded that Baldwin is concerned once knowing that Aubrey is important.
Someone is creepy and not bloody if and only if he is not successful.
As long as someone is either concerned or important, he is not successful and plain.
It can be concluded that Lane is not successful and Lee is bloody once knowing that Monique is not creepy.
If Lane is not plain or Ted is not important, then Lane is bloody.
It can be concluded that Lane is important once knowing that Aubrey is plain.
If someone who is concerned is also important, then he is not plain. | Lee is plain. | entailment |
Lane is not concerned.
Baldwin is creepy.
Sean is important.
Lee is plain.
Aubrey is not successful.
Lane is bloody.
Aubrey is plain.
Ted is not bloody.
Lane is creepy.
Aubrey is not creepy.
Sean is not successful.
Ted is not concerned.If there is at least one people who is both not successful and plain, then Baldwin is not concerned.
If Baldwin is not creepy, then Ted is not successful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not important, then Aubrey is not creepy.
If there is at least one people who is creepy, then Lane is successful.
If Lee is creepy and Lee is successful, then Lee is concerned.
It can be concluded that Baldwin is concerned once knowing that Aubrey is important.
Someone is creepy and not bloody if and only if he is not successful.
As long as someone is either concerned or important, he is not successful and plain.
It can be concluded that Lane is not successful and Lee is bloody once knowing that Monique is not creepy.
If Lane is not plain or Ted is not important, then Lane is bloody.
It can be concluded that Lane is important once knowing that Aubrey is plain.
If someone who is concerned is also important, then he is not plain. | Aubrey is bloody. | contradiction |
Lane is not concerned.
Baldwin is creepy.
Sean is important.
Lee is plain.
Aubrey is not successful.
Lane is bloody.
Aubrey is plain.
Ted is not bloody.
Lane is creepy.
Aubrey is not creepy.
Sean is not successful.
Ted is not concerned.If there is at least one people who is both not successful and plain, then Baldwin is not concerned.
If Baldwin is not creepy, then Ted is not successful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not important, then Aubrey is not creepy.
If there is at least one people who is creepy, then Lane is successful.
If Lee is creepy and Lee is successful, then Lee is concerned.
It can be concluded that Baldwin is concerned once knowing that Aubrey is important.
Someone is creepy and not bloody if and only if he is not successful.
As long as someone is either concerned or important, he is not successful and plain.
It can be concluded that Lane is not successful and Lee is bloody once knowing that Monique is not creepy.
If Lane is not plain or Ted is not important, then Lane is bloody.
It can be concluded that Lane is important once knowing that Aubrey is plain.
If someone who is concerned is also important, then he is not plain. | Ted is not concerned. | entailment |
Lane is not concerned.
Baldwin is creepy.
Sean is important.
Lee is plain.
Aubrey is not successful.
Lane is bloody.
Aubrey is plain.
Ted is not bloody.
Lane is creepy.
Aubrey is not creepy.
Sean is not successful.
Ted is not concerned.If there is at least one people who is both not successful and plain, then Baldwin is not concerned.
If Baldwin is not creepy, then Ted is not successful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not important, then Aubrey is not creepy.
If there is at least one people who is creepy, then Lane is successful.
If Lee is creepy and Lee is successful, then Lee is concerned.
It can be concluded that Baldwin is concerned once knowing that Aubrey is important.
Someone is creepy and not bloody if and only if he is not successful.
As long as someone is either concerned or important, he is not successful and plain.
It can be concluded that Lane is not successful and Lee is bloody once knowing that Monique is not creepy.
If Lane is not plain or Ted is not important, then Lane is bloody.
It can be concluded that Lane is important once knowing that Aubrey is plain.
If someone who is concerned is also important, then he is not plain. | Monique is not creepy. | neutral |
Lane is not concerned.
Baldwin is creepy.
Sean is important.
Lee is plain.
Aubrey is not successful.
Lane is bloody.
Aubrey is plain.
Ted is not bloody.
Lane is creepy.
Aubrey is not creepy.
Sean is not successful.
Ted is not concerned.If there is at least one people who is both not successful and plain, then Baldwin is not concerned.
If Baldwin is not creepy, then Ted is not successful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not important, then Aubrey is not creepy.
If there is at least one people who is creepy, then Lane is successful.
If Lee is creepy and Lee is successful, then Lee is concerned.
It can be concluded that Baldwin is concerned once knowing that Aubrey is important.
Someone is creepy and not bloody if and only if he is not successful.
As long as someone is either concerned or important, he is not successful and plain.
It can be concluded that Lane is not successful and Lee is bloody once knowing that Monique is not creepy.
If Lane is not plain or Ted is not important, then Lane is bloody.
It can be concluded that Lane is important once knowing that Aubrey is plain.
If someone who is concerned is also important, then he is not plain. | Ted is bloody. | contradiction |
Lane is not concerned.
Baldwin is creepy.
Sean is important.
Lee is plain.
Aubrey is not successful.
Lane is bloody.
Aubrey is plain.
Ted is not bloody.
Lane is creepy.
Aubrey is not creepy.
Sean is not successful.
Ted is not concerned.If there is at least one people who is both not successful and plain, then Baldwin is not concerned.
If Baldwin is not creepy, then Ted is not successful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not important, then Aubrey is not creepy.
If there is at least one people who is creepy, then Lane is successful.
If Lee is creepy and Lee is successful, then Lee is concerned.
It can be concluded that Baldwin is concerned once knowing that Aubrey is important.
Someone is creepy and not bloody if and only if he is not successful.
As long as someone is either concerned or important, he is not successful and plain.
It can be concluded that Lane is not successful and Lee is bloody once knowing that Monique is not creepy.
If Lane is not plain or Ted is not important, then Lane is bloody.
It can be concluded that Lane is important once knowing that Aubrey is plain.
If someone who is concerned is also important, then he is not plain. | Aubrey is plain. | entailment |
Lane is not concerned.
Baldwin is creepy.
Sean is important.
Lee is plain.
Aubrey is not successful.
Lane is bloody.
Aubrey is plain.
Ted is not bloody.
Lane is creepy.
Aubrey is not creepy.
Sean is not successful.
Ted is not concerned.If there is at least one people who is both not successful and plain, then Baldwin is not concerned.
If Baldwin is not creepy, then Ted is not successful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not important, then Aubrey is not creepy.
If there is at least one people who is creepy, then Lane is successful.
If Lee is creepy and Lee is successful, then Lee is concerned.
It can be concluded that Baldwin is concerned once knowing that Aubrey is important.
Someone is creepy and not bloody if and only if he is not successful.
As long as someone is either concerned or important, he is not successful and plain.
It can be concluded that Lane is not successful and Lee is bloody once knowing that Monique is not creepy.
If Lane is not plain or Ted is not important, then Lane is bloody.
It can be concluded that Lane is important once knowing that Aubrey is plain.
If someone who is concerned is also important, then he is not plain. | Lee is not concerned. | neutral |
Lane is not concerned.
Baldwin is creepy.
Sean is important.
Lee is plain.
Aubrey is not successful.
Lane is bloody.
Aubrey is plain.
Ted is not bloody.
Lane is creepy.
Aubrey is not creepy.
Sean is not successful.
Ted is not concerned.If there is at least one people who is both not successful and plain, then Baldwin is not concerned.
If Baldwin is not creepy, then Ted is not successful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not important, then Aubrey is not creepy.
If there is at least one people who is creepy, then Lane is successful.
If Lee is creepy and Lee is successful, then Lee is concerned.
It can be concluded that Baldwin is concerned once knowing that Aubrey is important.
Someone is creepy and not bloody if and only if he is not successful.
As long as someone is either concerned or important, he is not successful and plain.
It can be concluded that Lane is not successful and Lee is bloody once knowing that Monique is not creepy.
If Lane is not plain or Ted is not important, then Lane is bloody.
It can be concluded that Lane is important once knowing that Aubrey is plain.
If someone who is concerned is also important, then he is not plain. | Lane is not successful. | self_contradiction |
Lane is not concerned.
Baldwin is creepy.
Sean is important.
Lee is plain.
Aubrey is not successful.
Lane is bloody.
Aubrey is plain.
Ted is not bloody.
Lane is creepy.
Aubrey is not creepy.
Sean is not successful.
Ted is not concerned.If there is at least one people who is both not successful and plain, then Baldwin is not concerned.
If Baldwin is not creepy, then Ted is not successful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not important, then Aubrey is not creepy.
If there is at least one people who is creepy, then Lane is successful.
If Lee is creepy and Lee is successful, then Lee is concerned.
It can be concluded that Baldwin is concerned once knowing that Aubrey is important.
Someone is creepy and not bloody if and only if he is not successful.
As long as someone is either concerned or important, he is not successful and plain.
It can be concluded that Lane is not successful and Lee is bloody once knowing that Monique is not creepy.
If Lane is not plain or Ted is not important, then Lane is bloody.
It can be concluded that Lane is important once knowing that Aubrey is plain.
If someone who is concerned is also important, then he is not plain. | Lane is successful. | self_contradiction |
Lane is not concerned.
Baldwin is creepy.
Sean is important.
Lee is plain.
Aubrey is not successful.
Lane is bloody.
Aubrey is plain.
Ted is not bloody.
Lane is creepy.
Aubrey is not creepy.
Sean is not successful.
Ted is not concerned.If there is at least one people who is both not successful and plain, then Baldwin is not concerned.
If Baldwin is not creepy, then Ted is not successful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not important, then Aubrey is not creepy.
If there is at least one people who is creepy, then Lane is successful.
If Lee is creepy and Lee is successful, then Lee is concerned.
It can be concluded that Baldwin is concerned once knowing that Aubrey is important.
Someone is creepy and not bloody if and only if he is not successful.
As long as someone is either concerned or important, he is not successful and plain.
It can be concluded that Lane is not successful and Lee is bloody once knowing that Monique is not creepy.
If Lane is not plain or Ted is not important, then Lane is bloody.
It can be concluded that Lane is important once knowing that Aubrey is plain.
If someone who is concerned is also important, then he is not plain. | Lee is not creepy. | neutral |
Lane is not concerned.
Baldwin is creepy.
Sean is important.
Lee is plain.
Aubrey is not successful.
Lane is bloody.
Aubrey is plain.
Ted is not bloody.
Lane is creepy.
Aubrey is not creepy.
Sean is not successful.
Ted is not concerned.If there is at least one people who is both not successful and plain, then Baldwin is not concerned.
If Baldwin is not creepy, then Ted is not successful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not important, then Aubrey is not creepy.
If there is at least one people who is creepy, then Lane is successful.
If Lee is creepy and Lee is successful, then Lee is concerned.
It can be concluded that Baldwin is concerned once knowing that Aubrey is important.
Someone is creepy and not bloody if and only if he is not successful.
As long as someone is either concerned or important, he is not successful and plain.
It can be concluded that Lane is not successful and Lee is bloody once knowing that Monique is not creepy.
If Lane is not plain or Ted is not important, then Lane is bloody.
It can be concluded that Lane is important once knowing that Aubrey is plain.
If someone who is concerned is also important, then he is not plain. | Lane is not bloody. | self_contradiction |
Lane is not concerned.
Baldwin is creepy.
Sean is important.
Lee is plain.
Aubrey is not successful.
Lane is bloody.
Aubrey is plain.
Ted is not bloody.
Lane is creepy.
Aubrey is not creepy.
Sean is not successful.
Ted is not concerned.If there is at least one people who is both not successful and plain, then Baldwin is not concerned.
If Baldwin is not creepy, then Ted is not successful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not important, then Aubrey is not creepy.
If there is at least one people who is creepy, then Lane is successful.
If Lee is creepy and Lee is successful, then Lee is concerned.
It can be concluded that Baldwin is concerned once knowing that Aubrey is important.
Someone is creepy and not bloody if and only if he is not successful.
As long as someone is either concerned or important, he is not successful and plain.
It can be concluded that Lane is not successful and Lee is bloody once knowing that Monique is not creepy.
If Lane is not plain or Ted is not important, then Lane is bloody.
It can be concluded that Lane is important once knowing that Aubrey is plain.
If someone who is concerned is also important, then he is not plain. | Baldwin is important. | neutral |
Lane is not concerned.
Baldwin is creepy.
Sean is important.
Lee is plain.
Aubrey is not successful.
Lane is bloody.
Aubrey is plain.
Ted is not bloody.
Lane is creepy.
Aubrey is not creepy.
Sean is not successful.
Ted is not concerned.If there is at least one people who is both not successful and plain, then Baldwin is not concerned.
If Baldwin is not creepy, then Ted is not successful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not important, then Aubrey is not creepy.
If there is at least one people who is creepy, then Lane is successful.
If Lee is creepy and Lee is successful, then Lee is concerned.
It can be concluded that Baldwin is concerned once knowing that Aubrey is important.
Someone is creepy and not bloody if and only if he is not successful.
As long as someone is either concerned or important, he is not successful and plain.
It can be concluded that Lane is not successful and Lee is bloody once knowing that Monique is not creepy.
If Lane is not plain or Ted is not important, then Lane is bloody.
It can be concluded that Lane is important once knowing that Aubrey is plain.
If someone who is concerned is also important, then he is not plain. | Lane is bloody. | self_contradiction |
Lane is not concerned.
Baldwin is creepy.
Sean is important.
Lee is plain.
Aubrey is not successful.
Lane is bloody.
Aubrey is plain.
Ted is not bloody.
Lane is creepy.
Aubrey is not creepy.
Sean is not successful.
Ted is not concerned.If there is at least one people who is both not successful and plain, then Baldwin is not concerned.
If Baldwin is not creepy, then Ted is not successful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not important, then Aubrey is not creepy.
If there is at least one people who is creepy, then Lane is successful.
If Lee is creepy and Lee is successful, then Lee is concerned.
It can be concluded that Baldwin is concerned once knowing that Aubrey is important.
Someone is creepy and not bloody if and only if he is not successful.
As long as someone is either concerned or important, he is not successful and plain.
It can be concluded that Lane is not successful and Lee is bloody once knowing that Monique is not creepy.
If Lane is not plain or Ted is not important, then Lane is bloody.
It can be concluded that Lane is important once knowing that Aubrey is plain.
If someone who is concerned is also important, then he is not plain. | Aubrey is creepy. | self_contradiction |
Lane is not concerned.
Baldwin is creepy.
Sean is important.
Lee is plain.
Aubrey is not successful.
Lane is bloody.
Aubrey is plain.
Ted is not bloody.
Lane is creepy.
Aubrey is not creepy.
Sean is not successful.
Ted is not concerned.If there is at least one people who is both not successful and plain, then Baldwin is not concerned.
If Baldwin is not creepy, then Ted is not successful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not important, then Aubrey is not creepy.
If there is at least one people who is creepy, then Lane is successful.
If Lee is creepy and Lee is successful, then Lee is concerned.
It can be concluded that Baldwin is concerned once knowing that Aubrey is important.
Someone is creepy and not bloody if and only if he is not successful.
As long as someone is either concerned or important, he is not successful and plain.
It can be concluded that Lane is not successful and Lee is bloody once knowing that Monique is not creepy.
If Lane is not plain or Ted is not important, then Lane is bloody.
It can be concluded that Lane is important once knowing that Aubrey is plain.
If someone who is concerned is also important, then he is not plain. | Baldwin is bloody. | neutral |
Lane is not concerned.
Baldwin is creepy.
Sean is important.
Lee is plain.
Aubrey is not successful.
Lane is bloody.
Aubrey is plain.
Ted is not bloody.
Lane is creepy.
Aubrey is not creepy.
Sean is not successful.
Ted is not concerned.If there is at least one people who is both not successful and plain, then Baldwin is not concerned.
If Baldwin is not creepy, then Ted is not successful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not important, then Aubrey is not creepy.
If there is at least one people who is creepy, then Lane is successful.
If Lee is creepy and Lee is successful, then Lee is concerned.
It can be concluded that Baldwin is concerned once knowing that Aubrey is important.
Someone is creepy and not bloody if and only if he is not successful.
As long as someone is either concerned or important, he is not successful and plain.
It can be concluded that Lane is not successful and Lee is bloody once knowing that Monique is not creepy.
If Lane is not plain or Ted is not important, then Lane is bloody.
It can be concluded that Lane is important once knowing that Aubrey is plain.
If someone who is concerned is also important, then he is not plain. | Lee is not plain. | contradiction |
Lane is not concerned.
Baldwin is creepy.
Sean is important.
Lee is plain.
Aubrey is not successful.
Lane is bloody.
Aubrey is plain.
Ted is not bloody.
Lane is creepy.
Aubrey is not creepy.
Sean is not successful.
Ted is not concerned.If there is at least one people who is both not successful and plain, then Baldwin is not concerned.
If Baldwin is not creepy, then Ted is not successful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not important, then Aubrey is not creepy.
If there is at least one people who is creepy, then Lane is successful.
If Lee is creepy and Lee is successful, then Lee is concerned.
It can be concluded that Baldwin is concerned once knowing that Aubrey is important.
Someone is creepy and not bloody if and only if he is not successful.
As long as someone is either concerned or important, he is not successful and plain.
It can be concluded that Lane is not successful and Lee is bloody once knowing that Monique is not creepy.
If Lane is not plain or Ted is not important, then Lane is bloody.
It can be concluded that Lane is important once knowing that Aubrey is plain.
If someone who is concerned is also important, then he is not plain. | Sean is bloody. | contradiction |
Lane is not concerned.
Baldwin is creepy.
Sean is important.
Lee is plain.
Aubrey is not successful.
Lane is bloody.
Aubrey is plain.
Ted is not bloody.
Lane is creepy.
Aubrey is not creepy.
Sean is not successful.
Ted is not concerned.If there is at least one people who is both not successful and plain, then Baldwin is not concerned.
If Baldwin is not creepy, then Ted is not successful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not important, then Aubrey is not creepy.
If there is at least one people who is creepy, then Lane is successful.
If Lee is creepy and Lee is successful, then Lee is concerned.
It can be concluded that Baldwin is concerned once knowing that Aubrey is important.
Someone is creepy and not bloody if and only if he is not successful.
As long as someone is either concerned or important, he is not successful and plain.
It can be concluded that Lane is not successful and Lee is bloody once knowing that Monique is not creepy.
If Lane is not plain or Ted is not important, then Lane is bloody.
It can be concluded that Lane is important once knowing that Aubrey is plain.
If someone who is concerned is also important, then he is not plain. | Lane is creepy. | entailment |
Lane is not concerned.
Baldwin is creepy.
Sean is important.
Lee is plain.
Aubrey is not successful.
Lane is bloody.
Aubrey is plain.
Ted is not bloody.
Lane is creepy.
Aubrey is not creepy.
Sean is not successful.
Ted is not concerned.If there is at least one people who is both not successful and plain, then Baldwin is not concerned.
If Baldwin is not creepy, then Ted is not successful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not important, then Aubrey is not creepy.
If there is at least one people who is creepy, then Lane is successful.
If Lee is creepy and Lee is successful, then Lee is concerned.
It can be concluded that Baldwin is concerned once knowing that Aubrey is important.
Someone is creepy and not bloody if and only if he is not successful.
As long as someone is either concerned or important, he is not successful and plain.
It can be concluded that Lane is not successful and Lee is bloody once knowing that Monique is not creepy.
If Lane is not plain or Ted is not important, then Lane is bloody.
It can be concluded that Lane is important once knowing that Aubrey is plain.
If someone who is concerned is also important, then he is not plain. | Aubrey is successful. | contradiction |
Lane is not concerned.
Baldwin is creepy.
Sean is important.
Lee is plain.
Aubrey is not successful.
Lane is bloody.
Aubrey is plain.
Ted is not bloody.
Lane is creepy.
Aubrey is not creepy.
Sean is not successful.
Ted is not concerned.If there is at least one people who is both not successful and plain, then Baldwin is not concerned.
If Baldwin is not creepy, then Ted is not successful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not important, then Aubrey is not creepy.
If there is at least one people who is creepy, then Lane is successful.
If Lee is creepy and Lee is successful, then Lee is concerned.
It can be concluded that Baldwin is concerned once knowing that Aubrey is important.
Someone is creepy and not bloody if and only if he is not successful.
As long as someone is either concerned or important, he is not successful and plain.
It can be concluded that Lane is not successful and Lee is bloody once knowing that Monique is not creepy.
If Lane is not plain or Ted is not important, then Lane is bloody.
It can be concluded that Lane is important once knowing that Aubrey is plain.
If someone who is concerned is also important, then he is not plain. | Sean is important. | entailment |
Kyle is not zealous.
Gale is skinny.
Rosie is sensible.
Stephen is brave.
Rosie is brave.
Lee is not zealous.
Lee is beige.
Kyle is not brave.
Stephen is not zealous.
Stephen is beige.
Glenn is beige.
Glenn is nice.Someone being not nice is equivalent to being sensible.
It can be concluded that Glenn is not brave once knowing that Stephen is not nice.
If there is someone who is skinny, then Jessie is sensible and Jessie is zealous.
Stephen is brave if and only if Gale is skinny and Lee is nice.
If there is at least one people who is either not sensible or brave, then Stephen is nice and Gale is not beige.
If someone is not zealous or sensible, then he is skinny.
It can be concluded that Gale is brave and Lee is skinny once knowing that Gale is zealous.
As long as someone is nice, he is not beige and not zealous.
If there is someone who is not sensible, then Rosie is not zealous.
Someone who is not brave or skinny is always beige and not nice.
Someone is sensible and skinny if and only if he is not beige.
If Glenn is not brave, then Kyle is zealous, and vice versa. | Glenn is sensible. | entailment |
Kyle is not zealous.
Gale is skinny.
Rosie is sensible.
Stephen is brave.
Rosie is brave.
Lee is not zealous.
Lee is beige.
Kyle is not brave.
Stephen is not zealous.
Stephen is beige.
Glenn is beige.
Glenn is nice.Someone being not nice is equivalent to being sensible.
It can be concluded that Glenn is not brave once knowing that Stephen is not nice.
If there is someone who is skinny, then Jessie is sensible and Jessie is zealous.
Stephen is brave if and only if Gale is skinny and Lee is nice.
If there is at least one people who is either not sensible or brave, then Stephen is nice and Gale is not beige.
If someone is not zealous or sensible, then he is skinny.
It can be concluded that Gale is brave and Lee is skinny once knowing that Gale is zealous.
As long as someone is nice, he is not beige and not zealous.
If there is someone who is not sensible, then Rosie is not zealous.
Someone who is not brave or skinny is always beige and not nice.
Someone is sensible and skinny if and only if he is not beige.
If Glenn is not brave, then Kyle is zealous, and vice versa. | Jessie is not sensible. | contradiction |
Kyle is not zealous.
Gale is skinny.
Rosie is sensible.
Stephen is brave.
Rosie is brave.
Lee is not zealous.
Lee is beige.
Kyle is not brave.
Stephen is not zealous.
Stephen is beige.
Glenn is beige.
Glenn is nice.Someone being not nice is equivalent to being sensible.
It can be concluded that Glenn is not brave once knowing that Stephen is not nice.
If there is someone who is skinny, then Jessie is sensible and Jessie is zealous.
Stephen is brave if and only if Gale is skinny and Lee is nice.
If there is at least one people who is either not sensible or brave, then Stephen is nice and Gale is not beige.
If someone is not zealous or sensible, then he is skinny.
It can be concluded that Gale is brave and Lee is skinny once knowing that Gale is zealous.
As long as someone is nice, he is not beige and not zealous.
If there is someone who is not sensible, then Rosie is not zealous.
Someone who is not brave or skinny is always beige and not nice.
Someone is sensible and skinny if and only if he is not beige.
If Glenn is not brave, then Kyle is zealous, and vice versa. | Kyle is beige. | self_contradiction |
Kyle is not zealous.
Gale is skinny.
Rosie is sensible.
Stephen is brave.
Rosie is brave.
Lee is not zealous.
Lee is beige.
Kyle is not brave.
Stephen is not zealous.
Stephen is beige.
Glenn is beige.
Glenn is nice.Someone being not nice is equivalent to being sensible.
It can be concluded that Glenn is not brave once knowing that Stephen is not nice.
If there is someone who is skinny, then Jessie is sensible and Jessie is zealous.
Stephen is brave if and only if Gale is skinny and Lee is nice.
If there is at least one people who is either not sensible or brave, then Stephen is nice and Gale is not beige.
If someone is not zealous or sensible, then he is skinny.
It can be concluded that Gale is brave and Lee is skinny once knowing that Gale is zealous.
As long as someone is nice, he is not beige and not zealous.
If there is someone who is not sensible, then Rosie is not zealous.
Someone who is not brave or skinny is always beige and not nice.
Someone is sensible and skinny if and only if he is not beige.
If Glenn is not brave, then Kyle is zealous, and vice versa. | Stephen is skinny. | entailment |
Kyle is not zealous.
Gale is skinny.
Rosie is sensible.
Stephen is brave.
Rosie is brave.
Lee is not zealous.
Lee is beige.
Kyle is not brave.
Stephen is not zealous.
Stephen is beige.
Glenn is beige.
Glenn is nice.Someone being not nice is equivalent to being sensible.
It can be concluded that Glenn is not brave once knowing that Stephen is not nice.
If there is someone who is skinny, then Jessie is sensible and Jessie is zealous.
Stephen is brave if and only if Gale is skinny and Lee is nice.
If there is at least one people who is either not sensible or brave, then Stephen is nice and Gale is not beige.
If someone is not zealous or sensible, then he is skinny.
It can be concluded that Gale is brave and Lee is skinny once knowing that Gale is zealous.
As long as someone is nice, he is not beige and not zealous.
If there is someone who is not sensible, then Rosie is not zealous.
Someone who is not brave or skinny is always beige and not nice.
Someone is sensible and skinny if and only if he is not beige.
If Glenn is not brave, then Kyle is zealous, and vice versa. | Rosie is brave. | entailment |
Kyle is not zealous.
Gale is skinny.
Rosie is sensible.
Stephen is brave.
Rosie is brave.
Lee is not zealous.
Lee is beige.
Kyle is not brave.
Stephen is not zealous.
Stephen is beige.
Glenn is beige.
Glenn is nice.Someone being not nice is equivalent to being sensible.
It can be concluded that Glenn is not brave once knowing that Stephen is not nice.
If there is someone who is skinny, then Jessie is sensible and Jessie is zealous.
Stephen is brave if and only if Gale is skinny and Lee is nice.
If there is at least one people who is either not sensible or brave, then Stephen is nice and Gale is not beige.
If someone is not zealous or sensible, then he is skinny.
It can be concluded that Gale is brave and Lee is skinny once knowing that Gale is zealous.
As long as someone is nice, he is not beige and not zealous.
If there is someone who is not sensible, then Rosie is not zealous.
Someone who is not brave or skinny is always beige and not nice.
Someone is sensible and skinny if and only if he is not beige.
If Glenn is not brave, then Kyle is zealous, and vice versa. | Stephen is brave. | entailment |
Kyle is not zealous.
Gale is skinny.
Rosie is sensible.
Stephen is brave.
Rosie is brave.
Lee is not zealous.
Lee is beige.
Kyle is not brave.
Stephen is not zealous.
Stephen is beige.
Glenn is beige.
Glenn is nice.Someone being not nice is equivalent to being sensible.
It can be concluded that Glenn is not brave once knowing that Stephen is not nice.
If there is someone who is skinny, then Jessie is sensible and Jessie is zealous.
Stephen is brave if and only if Gale is skinny and Lee is nice.
If there is at least one people who is either not sensible or brave, then Stephen is nice and Gale is not beige.
If someone is not zealous or sensible, then he is skinny.
It can be concluded that Gale is brave and Lee is skinny once knowing that Gale is zealous.
As long as someone is nice, he is not beige and not zealous.
If there is someone who is not sensible, then Rosie is not zealous.
Someone who is not brave or skinny is always beige and not nice.
Someone is sensible and skinny if and only if he is not beige.
If Glenn is not brave, then Kyle is zealous, and vice versa. | Lee is not brave. | neutral |
Kyle is not zealous.
Gale is skinny.
Rosie is sensible.
Stephen is brave.
Rosie is brave.
Lee is not zealous.
Lee is beige.
Kyle is not brave.
Stephen is not zealous.
Stephen is beige.
Glenn is beige.
Glenn is nice.Someone being not nice is equivalent to being sensible.
It can be concluded that Glenn is not brave once knowing that Stephen is not nice.
If there is someone who is skinny, then Jessie is sensible and Jessie is zealous.
Stephen is brave if and only if Gale is skinny and Lee is nice.
If there is at least one people who is either not sensible or brave, then Stephen is nice and Gale is not beige.
If someone is not zealous or sensible, then he is skinny.
It can be concluded that Gale is brave and Lee is skinny once knowing that Gale is zealous.
As long as someone is nice, he is not beige and not zealous.
If there is someone who is not sensible, then Rosie is not zealous.
Someone who is not brave or skinny is always beige and not nice.
Someone is sensible and skinny if and only if he is not beige.
If Glenn is not brave, then Kyle is zealous, and vice versa. | Jessie is not beige. | self_contradiction |
Kyle is not zealous.
Gale is skinny.
Rosie is sensible.
Stephen is brave.
Rosie is brave.
Lee is not zealous.
Lee is beige.
Kyle is not brave.
Stephen is not zealous.
Stephen is beige.
Glenn is beige.
Glenn is nice.Someone being not nice is equivalent to being sensible.
It can be concluded that Glenn is not brave once knowing that Stephen is not nice.
If there is someone who is skinny, then Jessie is sensible and Jessie is zealous.
Stephen is brave if and only if Gale is skinny and Lee is nice.
If there is at least one people who is either not sensible or brave, then Stephen is nice and Gale is not beige.
If someone is not zealous or sensible, then he is skinny.
It can be concluded that Gale is brave and Lee is skinny once knowing that Gale is zealous.
As long as someone is nice, he is not beige and not zealous.
If there is someone who is not sensible, then Rosie is not zealous.
Someone who is not brave or skinny is always beige and not nice.
Someone is sensible and skinny if and only if he is not beige.
If Glenn is not brave, then Kyle is zealous, and vice versa. | Gale is not brave. | neutral |
Kyle is not zealous.
Gale is skinny.
Rosie is sensible.
Stephen is brave.
Rosie is brave.
Lee is not zealous.
Lee is beige.
Kyle is not brave.
Stephen is not zealous.
Stephen is beige.
Glenn is beige.
Glenn is nice.Someone being not nice is equivalent to being sensible.
It can be concluded that Glenn is not brave once knowing that Stephen is not nice.
If there is someone who is skinny, then Jessie is sensible and Jessie is zealous.
Stephen is brave if and only if Gale is skinny and Lee is nice.
If there is at least one people who is either not sensible or brave, then Stephen is nice and Gale is not beige.
If someone is not zealous or sensible, then he is skinny.
It can be concluded that Gale is brave and Lee is skinny once knowing that Gale is zealous.
As long as someone is nice, he is not beige and not zealous.
If there is someone who is not sensible, then Rosie is not zealous.
Someone who is not brave or skinny is always beige and not nice.
Someone is sensible and skinny if and only if he is not beige.
If Glenn is not brave, then Kyle is zealous, and vice versa. | Jessie is not zealous. | contradiction |
Kyle is not zealous.
Gale is skinny.
Rosie is sensible.
Stephen is brave.
Rosie is brave.
Lee is not zealous.
Lee is beige.
Kyle is not brave.
Stephen is not zealous.
Stephen is beige.
Glenn is beige.
Glenn is nice.Someone being not nice is equivalent to being sensible.
It can be concluded that Glenn is not brave once knowing that Stephen is not nice.
If there is someone who is skinny, then Jessie is sensible and Jessie is zealous.
Stephen is brave if and only if Gale is skinny and Lee is nice.
If there is at least one people who is either not sensible or brave, then Stephen is nice and Gale is not beige.
If someone is not zealous or sensible, then he is skinny.
It can be concluded that Gale is brave and Lee is skinny once knowing that Gale is zealous.
As long as someone is nice, he is not beige and not zealous.
If there is someone who is not sensible, then Rosie is not zealous.
Someone who is not brave or skinny is always beige and not nice.
Someone is sensible and skinny if and only if he is not beige.
If Glenn is not brave, then Kyle is zealous, and vice versa. | Gale is beige. | self_contradiction |
Kyle is not zealous.
Gale is skinny.
Rosie is sensible.
Stephen is brave.
Rosie is brave.
Lee is not zealous.
Lee is beige.
Kyle is not brave.
Stephen is not zealous.
Stephen is beige.
Glenn is beige.
Glenn is nice.Someone being not nice is equivalent to being sensible.
It can be concluded that Glenn is not brave once knowing that Stephen is not nice.
If there is someone who is skinny, then Jessie is sensible and Jessie is zealous.
Stephen is brave if and only if Gale is skinny and Lee is nice.
If there is at least one people who is either not sensible or brave, then Stephen is nice and Gale is not beige.
If someone is not zealous or sensible, then he is skinny.
It can be concluded that Gale is brave and Lee is skinny once knowing that Gale is zealous.
As long as someone is nice, he is not beige and not zealous.
If there is someone who is not sensible, then Rosie is not zealous.
Someone who is not brave or skinny is always beige and not nice.
Someone is sensible and skinny if and only if he is not beige.
If Glenn is not brave, then Kyle is zealous, and vice versa. | Stephen is not skinny. | contradiction |
Kyle is not zealous.
Gale is skinny.
Rosie is sensible.
Stephen is brave.
Rosie is brave.
Lee is not zealous.
Lee is beige.
Kyle is not brave.
Stephen is not zealous.
Stephen is beige.
Glenn is beige.
Glenn is nice.Someone being not nice is equivalent to being sensible.
It can be concluded that Glenn is not brave once knowing that Stephen is not nice.
If there is someone who is skinny, then Jessie is sensible and Jessie is zealous.
Stephen is brave if and only if Gale is skinny and Lee is nice.
If there is at least one people who is either not sensible or brave, then Stephen is nice and Gale is not beige.
If someone is not zealous or sensible, then he is skinny.
It can be concluded that Gale is brave and Lee is skinny once knowing that Gale is zealous.
As long as someone is nice, he is not beige and not zealous.
If there is someone who is not sensible, then Rosie is not zealous.
Someone who is not brave or skinny is always beige and not nice.
Someone is sensible and skinny if and only if he is not beige.
If Glenn is not brave, then Kyle is zealous, and vice versa. | Gale is not beige. | self_contradiction |
Kyle is not zealous.
Gale is skinny.
Rosie is sensible.
Stephen is brave.
Rosie is brave.
Lee is not zealous.
Lee is beige.
Kyle is not brave.
Stephen is not zealous.
Stephen is beige.
Glenn is beige.
Glenn is nice.Someone being not nice is equivalent to being sensible.
It can be concluded that Glenn is not brave once knowing that Stephen is not nice.
If there is someone who is skinny, then Jessie is sensible and Jessie is zealous.
Stephen is brave if and only if Gale is skinny and Lee is nice.
If there is at least one people who is either not sensible or brave, then Stephen is nice and Gale is not beige.
If someone is not zealous or sensible, then he is skinny.
It can be concluded that Gale is brave and Lee is skinny once knowing that Gale is zealous.
As long as someone is nice, he is not beige and not zealous.
If there is someone who is not sensible, then Rosie is not zealous.
Someone who is not brave or skinny is always beige and not nice.
Someone is sensible and skinny if and only if he is not beige.
If Glenn is not brave, then Kyle is zealous, and vice versa. | Lee is brave. | neutral |
Kyle is not zealous.
Gale is skinny.
Rosie is sensible.
Stephen is brave.
Rosie is brave.
Lee is not zealous.
Lee is beige.
Kyle is not brave.
Stephen is not zealous.
Stephen is beige.
Glenn is beige.
Glenn is nice.Someone being not nice is equivalent to being sensible.
It can be concluded that Glenn is not brave once knowing that Stephen is not nice.
If there is someone who is skinny, then Jessie is sensible and Jessie is zealous.
Stephen is brave if and only if Gale is skinny and Lee is nice.
If there is at least one people who is either not sensible or brave, then Stephen is nice and Gale is not beige.
If someone is not zealous or sensible, then he is skinny.
It can be concluded that Gale is brave and Lee is skinny once knowing that Gale is zealous.
As long as someone is nice, he is not beige and not zealous.
If there is someone who is not sensible, then Rosie is not zealous.
Someone who is not brave or skinny is always beige and not nice.
Someone is sensible and skinny if and only if he is not beige.
If Glenn is not brave, then Kyle is zealous, and vice versa. | Kyle is zealous. | self_contradiction |
Kyle is not zealous.
Gale is skinny.
Rosie is sensible.
Stephen is brave.
Rosie is brave.
Lee is not zealous.
Lee is beige.
Kyle is not brave.
Stephen is not zealous.
Stephen is beige.
Glenn is beige.
Glenn is nice.Someone being not nice is equivalent to being sensible.
It can be concluded that Glenn is not brave once knowing that Stephen is not nice.
If there is someone who is skinny, then Jessie is sensible and Jessie is zealous.
Stephen is brave if and only if Gale is skinny and Lee is nice.
If there is at least one people who is either not sensible or brave, then Stephen is nice and Gale is not beige.
If someone is not zealous or sensible, then he is skinny.
It can be concluded that Gale is brave and Lee is skinny once knowing that Gale is zealous.
As long as someone is nice, he is not beige and not zealous.
If there is someone who is not sensible, then Rosie is not zealous.
Someone who is not brave or skinny is always beige and not nice.
Someone is sensible and skinny if and only if he is not beige.
If Glenn is not brave, then Kyle is zealous, and vice versa. | Jessie is brave. | neutral |
Kyle is not zealous.
Gale is skinny.
Rosie is sensible.
Stephen is brave.
Rosie is brave.
Lee is not zealous.
Lee is beige.
Kyle is not brave.
Stephen is not zealous.
Stephen is beige.
Glenn is beige.
Glenn is nice.Someone being not nice is equivalent to being sensible.
It can be concluded that Glenn is not brave once knowing that Stephen is not nice.
If there is someone who is skinny, then Jessie is sensible and Jessie is zealous.
Stephen is brave if and only if Gale is skinny and Lee is nice.
If there is at least one people who is either not sensible or brave, then Stephen is nice and Gale is not beige.
If someone is not zealous or sensible, then he is skinny.
It can be concluded that Gale is brave and Lee is skinny once knowing that Gale is zealous.
As long as someone is nice, he is not beige and not zealous.
If there is someone who is not sensible, then Rosie is not zealous.
Someone who is not brave or skinny is always beige and not nice.
Someone is sensible and skinny if and only if he is not beige.
If Glenn is not brave, then Kyle is zealous, and vice versa. | Kyle is not nice. | entailment |
Kyle is not zealous.
Gale is skinny.
Rosie is sensible.
Stephen is brave.
Rosie is brave.
Lee is not zealous.
Lee is beige.
Kyle is not brave.
Stephen is not zealous.
Stephen is beige.
Glenn is beige.
Glenn is nice.Someone being not nice is equivalent to being sensible.
It can be concluded that Glenn is not brave once knowing that Stephen is not nice.
If there is someone who is skinny, then Jessie is sensible and Jessie is zealous.
Stephen is brave if and only if Gale is skinny and Lee is nice.
If there is at least one people who is either not sensible or brave, then Stephen is nice and Gale is not beige.
If someone is not zealous or sensible, then he is skinny.
It can be concluded that Gale is brave and Lee is skinny once knowing that Gale is zealous.
As long as someone is nice, he is not beige and not zealous.
If there is someone who is not sensible, then Rosie is not zealous.
Someone who is not brave or skinny is always beige and not nice.
Someone is sensible and skinny if and only if he is not beige.
If Glenn is not brave, then Kyle is zealous, and vice versa. | Jessie is not skinny. | contradiction |
Kyle is not zealous.
Gale is skinny.
Rosie is sensible.
Stephen is brave.
Rosie is brave.
Lee is not zealous.
Lee is beige.
Kyle is not brave.
Stephen is not zealous.
Stephen is beige.
Glenn is beige.
Glenn is nice.Someone being not nice is equivalent to being sensible.
It can be concluded that Glenn is not brave once knowing that Stephen is not nice.
If there is someone who is skinny, then Jessie is sensible and Jessie is zealous.
Stephen is brave if and only if Gale is skinny and Lee is nice.
If there is at least one people who is either not sensible or brave, then Stephen is nice and Gale is not beige.
If someone is not zealous or sensible, then he is skinny.
It can be concluded that Gale is brave and Lee is skinny once knowing that Gale is zealous.
As long as someone is nice, he is not beige and not zealous.
If there is someone who is not sensible, then Rosie is not zealous.
Someone who is not brave or skinny is always beige and not nice.
Someone is sensible and skinny if and only if he is not beige.
If Glenn is not brave, then Kyle is zealous, and vice versa. | Kyle is not skinny. | contradiction |
Kyle is not zealous.
Gale is skinny.
Rosie is sensible.
Stephen is brave.
Rosie is brave.
Lee is not zealous.
Lee is beige.
Kyle is not brave.
Stephen is not zealous.
Stephen is beige.
Glenn is beige.
Glenn is nice.Someone being not nice is equivalent to being sensible.
It can be concluded that Glenn is not brave once knowing that Stephen is not nice.
If there is someone who is skinny, then Jessie is sensible and Jessie is zealous.
Stephen is brave if and only if Gale is skinny and Lee is nice.
If there is at least one people who is either not sensible or brave, then Stephen is nice and Gale is not beige.
If someone is not zealous or sensible, then he is skinny.
It can be concluded that Gale is brave and Lee is skinny once knowing that Gale is zealous.
As long as someone is nice, he is not beige and not zealous.
If there is someone who is not sensible, then Rosie is not zealous.
Someone who is not brave or skinny is always beige and not nice.
Someone is sensible and skinny if and only if he is not beige.
If Glenn is not brave, then Kyle is zealous, and vice versa. | Rosie is not zealous. | neutral |
Rory is neat.
Rory is unpleasant.
Hunter is not unpleasant.
Tommy is right.
Paxton is unpleasant.
Paxton is not neat.
Tommy is lucky.
Hunter is neat.
Paxton is enchanting.
Peter is not right.
Tommy is not enchanting.
Tommy is not federal.Peter being not enchanting is equivalent to Tommy being not neat.
It can be concluded that Tommy is enchanting once knowing that Peter is not lucky or Hunter is federal.
Someone is unpleasant and federal if and only if he is lucky and enchanting.
If someone is not unpleasant and not lucky, then he is both right and not enchanting, and vice versa.
Hunter is right if and only if Rory is not lucky.
If someone who is not neat is also unpleasant, then he is federal.
Paxton is not right if and only if Hunter is enchanting and Paxton is federal.
If someone is right or not enchanting, then he is not unpleasant.
As long as someone is not unpleasant, he is enchanting and lucky.
If Rory is not unpleasant or Paxton is lucky, then Rory is neat.
Peter being unpleasant and Peter being neat are equivalent to Tommy being not enchanting and Paxton being not lucky.
If Hunter is not neat, then Paxton is enchanting. | Tommy is not right. | contradiction |
Rory is neat.
Rory is unpleasant.
Hunter is not unpleasant.
Tommy is right.
Paxton is unpleasant.
Paxton is not neat.
Tommy is lucky.
Hunter is neat.
Paxton is enchanting.
Peter is not right.
Tommy is not enchanting.
Tommy is not federal.Peter being not enchanting is equivalent to Tommy being not neat.
It can be concluded that Tommy is enchanting once knowing that Peter is not lucky or Hunter is federal.
Someone is unpleasant and federal if and only if he is lucky and enchanting.
If someone is not unpleasant and not lucky, then he is both right and not enchanting, and vice versa.
Hunter is right if and only if Rory is not lucky.
If someone who is not neat is also unpleasant, then he is federal.
Paxton is not right if and only if Hunter is enchanting and Paxton is federal.
If someone is right or not enchanting, then he is not unpleasant.
As long as someone is not unpleasant, he is enchanting and lucky.
If Rory is not unpleasant or Paxton is lucky, then Rory is neat.
Peter being unpleasant and Peter being neat are equivalent to Tommy being not enchanting and Paxton being not lucky.
If Hunter is not neat, then Paxton is enchanting. | Garrick is not unpleasant. | neutral |
Rory is neat.
Rory is unpleasant.
Hunter is not unpleasant.
Tommy is right.
Paxton is unpleasant.
Paxton is not neat.
Tommy is lucky.
Hunter is neat.
Paxton is enchanting.
Peter is not right.
Tommy is not enchanting.
Tommy is not federal.Peter being not enchanting is equivalent to Tommy being not neat.
It can be concluded that Tommy is enchanting once knowing that Peter is not lucky or Hunter is federal.
Someone is unpleasant and federal if and only if he is lucky and enchanting.
If someone is not unpleasant and not lucky, then he is both right and not enchanting, and vice versa.
Hunter is right if and only if Rory is not lucky.
If someone who is not neat is also unpleasant, then he is federal.
Paxton is not right if and only if Hunter is enchanting and Paxton is federal.
If someone is right or not enchanting, then he is not unpleasant.
As long as someone is not unpleasant, he is enchanting and lucky.
If Rory is not unpleasant or Paxton is lucky, then Rory is neat.
Peter being unpleasant and Peter being neat are equivalent to Tommy being not enchanting and Paxton being not lucky.
If Hunter is not neat, then Paxton is enchanting. | Paxton is unpleasant. | entailment |
Rory is neat.
Rory is unpleasant.
Hunter is not unpleasant.
Tommy is right.
Paxton is unpleasant.
Paxton is not neat.
Tommy is lucky.
Hunter is neat.
Paxton is enchanting.
Peter is not right.
Tommy is not enchanting.
Tommy is not federal.Peter being not enchanting is equivalent to Tommy being not neat.
It can be concluded that Tommy is enchanting once knowing that Peter is not lucky or Hunter is federal.
Someone is unpleasant and federal if and only if he is lucky and enchanting.
If someone is not unpleasant and not lucky, then he is both right and not enchanting, and vice versa.
Hunter is right if and only if Rory is not lucky.
If someone who is not neat is also unpleasant, then he is federal.
Paxton is not right if and only if Hunter is enchanting and Paxton is federal.
If someone is right or not enchanting, then he is not unpleasant.
As long as someone is not unpleasant, he is enchanting and lucky.
If Rory is not unpleasant or Paxton is lucky, then Rory is neat.
Peter being unpleasant and Peter being neat are equivalent to Tommy being not enchanting and Paxton being not lucky.
If Hunter is not neat, then Paxton is enchanting. | Garrick is enchanting. | neutral |
Rory is neat.
Rory is unpleasant.
Hunter is not unpleasant.
Tommy is right.
Paxton is unpleasant.
Paxton is not neat.
Tommy is lucky.
Hunter is neat.
Paxton is enchanting.
Peter is not right.
Tommy is not enchanting.
Tommy is not federal.Peter being not enchanting is equivalent to Tommy being not neat.
It can be concluded that Tommy is enchanting once knowing that Peter is not lucky or Hunter is federal.
Someone is unpleasant and federal if and only if he is lucky and enchanting.
If someone is not unpleasant and not lucky, then he is both right and not enchanting, and vice versa.
Hunter is right if and only if Rory is not lucky.
If someone who is not neat is also unpleasant, then he is federal.
Paxton is not right if and only if Hunter is enchanting and Paxton is federal.
If someone is right or not enchanting, then he is not unpleasant.
As long as someone is not unpleasant, he is enchanting and lucky.
If Rory is not unpleasant or Paxton is lucky, then Rory is neat.
Peter being unpleasant and Peter being neat are equivalent to Tommy being not enchanting and Paxton being not lucky.
If Hunter is not neat, then Paxton is enchanting. | Hunter is not neat. | contradiction |
Rory is neat.
Rory is unpleasant.
Hunter is not unpleasant.
Tommy is right.
Paxton is unpleasant.
Paxton is not neat.
Tommy is lucky.
Hunter is neat.
Paxton is enchanting.
Peter is not right.
Tommy is not enchanting.
Tommy is not federal.Peter being not enchanting is equivalent to Tommy being not neat.
It can be concluded that Tommy is enchanting once knowing that Peter is not lucky or Hunter is federal.
Someone is unpleasant and federal if and only if he is lucky and enchanting.
If someone is not unpleasant and not lucky, then he is both right and not enchanting, and vice versa.
Hunter is right if and only if Rory is not lucky.
If someone who is not neat is also unpleasant, then he is federal.
Paxton is not right if and only if Hunter is enchanting and Paxton is federal.
If someone is right or not enchanting, then he is not unpleasant.
As long as someone is not unpleasant, he is enchanting and lucky.
If Rory is not unpleasant or Paxton is lucky, then Rory is neat.
Peter being unpleasant and Peter being neat are equivalent to Tommy being not enchanting and Paxton being not lucky.
If Hunter is not neat, then Paxton is enchanting. | Tommy is right. | entailment |
Rory is neat.
Rory is unpleasant.
Hunter is not unpleasant.
Tommy is right.
Paxton is unpleasant.
Paxton is not neat.
Tommy is lucky.
Hunter is neat.
Paxton is enchanting.
Peter is not right.
Tommy is not enchanting.
Tommy is not federal.Peter being not enchanting is equivalent to Tommy being not neat.
It can be concluded that Tommy is enchanting once knowing that Peter is not lucky or Hunter is federal.
Someone is unpleasant and federal if and only if he is lucky and enchanting.
If someone is not unpleasant and not lucky, then he is both right and not enchanting, and vice versa.
Hunter is right if and only if Rory is not lucky.
If someone who is not neat is also unpleasant, then he is federal.
Paxton is not right if and only if Hunter is enchanting and Paxton is federal.
If someone is right or not enchanting, then he is not unpleasant.
As long as someone is not unpleasant, he is enchanting and lucky.
If Rory is not unpleasant or Paxton is lucky, then Rory is neat.
Peter being unpleasant and Peter being neat are equivalent to Tommy being not enchanting and Paxton being not lucky.
If Hunter is not neat, then Paxton is enchanting. | Tommy is not lucky. | self_contradiction |
Rory is neat.
Rory is unpleasant.
Hunter is not unpleasant.
Tommy is right.
Paxton is unpleasant.
Paxton is not neat.
Tommy is lucky.
Hunter is neat.
Paxton is enchanting.
Peter is not right.
Tommy is not enchanting.
Tommy is not federal.Peter being not enchanting is equivalent to Tommy being not neat.
It can be concluded that Tommy is enchanting once knowing that Peter is not lucky or Hunter is federal.
Someone is unpleasant and federal if and only if he is lucky and enchanting.
If someone is not unpleasant and not lucky, then he is both right and not enchanting, and vice versa.
Hunter is right if and only if Rory is not lucky.
If someone who is not neat is also unpleasant, then he is federal.
Paxton is not right if and only if Hunter is enchanting and Paxton is federal.
If someone is right or not enchanting, then he is not unpleasant.
As long as someone is not unpleasant, he is enchanting and lucky.
If Rory is not unpleasant or Paxton is lucky, then Rory is neat.
Peter being unpleasant and Peter being neat are equivalent to Tommy being not enchanting and Paxton being not lucky.
If Hunter is not neat, then Paxton is enchanting. | Rory is federal. | neutral |
Rory is neat.
Rory is unpleasant.
Hunter is not unpleasant.
Tommy is right.
Paxton is unpleasant.
Paxton is not neat.
Tommy is lucky.
Hunter is neat.
Paxton is enchanting.
Peter is not right.
Tommy is not enchanting.
Tommy is not federal.Peter being not enchanting is equivalent to Tommy being not neat.
It can be concluded that Tommy is enchanting once knowing that Peter is not lucky or Hunter is federal.
Someone is unpleasant and federal if and only if he is lucky and enchanting.
If someone is not unpleasant and not lucky, then he is both right and not enchanting, and vice versa.
Hunter is right if and only if Rory is not lucky.
If someone who is not neat is also unpleasant, then he is federal.
Paxton is not right if and only if Hunter is enchanting and Paxton is federal.
If someone is right or not enchanting, then he is not unpleasant.
As long as someone is not unpleasant, he is enchanting and lucky.
If Rory is not unpleasant or Paxton is lucky, then Rory is neat.
Peter being unpleasant and Peter being neat are equivalent to Tommy being not enchanting and Paxton being not lucky.
If Hunter is not neat, then Paxton is enchanting. | Hunter is not lucky. | contradiction |
Rory is neat.
Rory is unpleasant.
Hunter is not unpleasant.
Tommy is right.
Paxton is unpleasant.
Paxton is not neat.
Tommy is lucky.
Hunter is neat.
Paxton is enchanting.
Peter is not right.
Tommy is not enchanting.
Tommy is not federal.Peter being not enchanting is equivalent to Tommy being not neat.
It can be concluded that Tommy is enchanting once knowing that Peter is not lucky or Hunter is federal.
Someone is unpleasant and federal if and only if he is lucky and enchanting.
If someone is not unpleasant and not lucky, then he is both right and not enchanting, and vice versa.
Hunter is right if and only if Rory is not lucky.
If someone who is not neat is also unpleasant, then he is federal.
Paxton is not right if and only if Hunter is enchanting and Paxton is federal.
If someone is right or not enchanting, then he is not unpleasant.
As long as someone is not unpleasant, he is enchanting and lucky.
If Rory is not unpleasant or Paxton is lucky, then Rory is neat.
Peter being unpleasant and Peter being neat are equivalent to Tommy being not enchanting and Paxton being not lucky.
If Hunter is not neat, then Paxton is enchanting. | Paxton is enchanting. | entailment |
Rory is neat.
Rory is unpleasant.
Hunter is not unpleasant.
Tommy is right.
Paxton is unpleasant.
Paxton is not neat.
Tommy is lucky.
Hunter is neat.
Paxton is enchanting.
Peter is not right.
Tommy is not enchanting.
Tommy is not federal.Peter being not enchanting is equivalent to Tommy being not neat.
It can be concluded that Tommy is enchanting once knowing that Peter is not lucky or Hunter is federal.
Someone is unpleasant and federal if and only if he is lucky and enchanting.
If someone is not unpleasant and not lucky, then he is both right and not enchanting, and vice versa.
Hunter is right if and only if Rory is not lucky.
If someone who is not neat is also unpleasant, then he is federal.
Paxton is not right if and only if Hunter is enchanting and Paxton is federal.
If someone is right or not enchanting, then he is not unpleasant.
As long as someone is not unpleasant, he is enchanting and lucky.
If Rory is not unpleasant or Paxton is lucky, then Rory is neat.
Peter being unpleasant and Peter being neat are equivalent to Tommy being not enchanting and Paxton being not lucky.
If Hunter is not neat, then Paxton is enchanting. | Tommy is federal. | self_contradiction |
Rory is neat.
Rory is unpleasant.
Hunter is not unpleasant.
Tommy is right.
Paxton is unpleasant.
Paxton is not neat.
Tommy is lucky.
Hunter is neat.
Paxton is enchanting.
Peter is not right.
Tommy is not enchanting.
Tommy is not federal.Peter being not enchanting is equivalent to Tommy being not neat.
It can be concluded that Tommy is enchanting once knowing that Peter is not lucky or Hunter is federal.
Someone is unpleasant and federal if and only if he is lucky and enchanting.
If someone is not unpleasant and not lucky, then he is both right and not enchanting, and vice versa.
Hunter is right if and only if Rory is not lucky.
If someone who is not neat is also unpleasant, then he is federal.
Paxton is not right if and only if Hunter is enchanting and Paxton is federal.
If someone is right or not enchanting, then he is not unpleasant.
As long as someone is not unpleasant, he is enchanting and lucky.
If Rory is not unpleasant or Paxton is lucky, then Rory is neat.
Peter being unpleasant and Peter being neat are equivalent to Tommy being not enchanting and Paxton being not lucky.
If Hunter is not neat, then Paxton is enchanting. | Rupert is neat. | neutral |
Rory is neat.
Rory is unpleasant.
Hunter is not unpleasant.
Tommy is right.
Paxton is unpleasant.
Paxton is not neat.
Tommy is lucky.
Hunter is neat.
Paxton is enchanting.
Peter is not right.
Tommy is not enchanting.
Tommy is not federal.Peter being not enchanting is equivalent to Tommy being not neat.
It can be concluded that Tommy is enchanting once knowing that Peter is not lucky or Hunter is federal.
Someone is unpleasant and federal if and only if he is lucky and enchanting.
If someone is not unpleasant and not lucky, then he is both right and not enchanting, and vice versa.
Hunter is right if and only if Rory is not lucky.
If someone who is not neat is also unpleasant, then he is federal.
Paxton is not right if and only if Hunter is enchanting and Paxton is federal.
If someone is right or not enchanting, then he is not unpleasant.
As long as someone is not unpleasant, he is enchanting and lucky.
If Rory is not unpleasant or Paxton is lucky, then Rory is neat.
Peter being unpleasant and Peter being neat are equivalent to Tommy being not enchanting and Paxton being not lucky.
If Hunter is not neat, then Paxton is enchanting. | Tommy is unpleasant. | self_contradiction |
Rory is neat.
Rory is unpleasant.
Hunter is not unpleasant.
Tommy is right.
Paxton is unpleasant.
Paxton is not neat.
Tommy is lucky.
Hunter is neat.
Paxton is enchanting.
Peter is not right.
Tommy is not enchanting.
Tommy is not federal.Peter being not enchanting is equivalent to Tommy being not neat.
It can be concluded that Tommy is enchanting once knowing that Peter is not lucky or Hunter is federal.
Someone is unpleasant and federal if and only if he is lucky and enchanting.
If someone is not unpleasant and not lucky, then he is both right and not enchanting, and vice versa.
Hunter is right if and only if Rory is not lucky.
If someone who is not neat is also unpleasant, then he is federal.
Paxton is not right if and only if Hunter is enchanting and Paxton is federal.
If someone is right or not enchanting, then he is not unpleasant.
As long as someone is not unpleasant, he is enchanting and lucky.
If Rory is not unpleasant or Paxton is lucky, then Rory is neat.
Peter being unpleasant and Peter being neat are equivalent to Tommy being not enchanting and Paxton being not lucky.
If Hunter is not neat, then Paxton is enchanting. | Rory is neat. | entailment |
Rory is neat.
Rory is unpleasant.
Hunter is not unpleasant.
Tommy is right.
Paxton is unpleasant.
Paxton is not neat.
Tommy is lucky.
Hunter is neat.
Paxton is enchanting.
Peter is not right.
Tommy is not enchanting.
Tommy is not federal.Peter being not enchanting is equivalent to Tommy being not neat.
It can be concluded that Tommy is enchanting once knowing that Peter is not lucky or Hunter is federal.
Someone is unpleasant and federal if and only if he is lucky and enchanting.
If someone is not unpleasant and not lucky, then he is both right and not enchanting, and vice versa.
Hunter is right if and only if Rory is not lucky.
If someone who is not neat is also unpleasant, then he is federal.
Paxton is not right if and only if Hunter is enchanting and Paxton is federal.
If someone is right or not enchanting, then he is not unpleasant.
As long as someone is not unpleasant, he is enchanting and lucky.
If Rory is not unpleasant or Paxton is lucky, then Rory is neat.
Peter being unpleasant and Peter being neat are equivalent to Tommy being not enchanting and Paxton being not lucky.
If Hunter is not neat, then Paxton is enchanting. | Rory is not neat. | contradiction |
Rory is neat.
Rory is unpleasant.
Hunter is not unpleasant.
Tommy is right.
Paxton is unpleasant.
Paxton is not neat.
Tommy is lucky.
Hunter is neat.
Paxton is enchanting.
Peter is not right.
Tommy is not enchanting.
Tommy is not federal.Peter being not enchanting is equivalent to Tommy being not neat.
It can be concluded that Tommy is enchanting once knowing that Peter is not lucky or Hunter is federal.
Someone is unpleasant and federal if and only if he is lucky and enchanting.
If someone is not unpleasant and not lucky, then he is both right and not enchanting, and vice versa.
Hunter is right if and only if Rory is not lucky.
If someone who is not neat is also unpleasant, then he is federal.
Paxton is not right if and only if Hunter is enchanting and Paxton is federal.
If someone is right or not enchanting, then he is not unpleasant.
As long as someone is not unpleasant, he is enchanting and lucky.
If Rory is not unpleasant or Paxton is lucky, then Rory is neat.
Peter being unpleasant and Peter being neat are equivalent to Tommy being not enchanting and Paxton being not lucky.
If Hunter is not neat, then Paxton is enchanting. | Tommy is not federal. | self_contradiction |
Rory is neat.
Rory is unpleasant.
Hunter is not unpleasant.
Tommy is right.
Paxton is unpleasant.
Paxton is not neat.
Tommy is lucky.
Hunter is neat.
Paxton is enchanting.
Peter is not right.
Tommy is not enchanting.
Tommy is not federal.Peter being not enchanting is equivalent to Tommy being not neat.
It can be concluded that Tommy is enchanting once knowing that Peter is not lucky or Hunter is federal.
Someone is unpleasant and federal if and only if he is lucky and enchanting.
If someone is not unpleasant and not lucky, then he is both right and not enchanting, and vice versa.
Hunter is right if and only if Rory is not lucky.
If someone who is not neat is also unpleasant, then he is federal.
Paxton is not right if and only if Hunter is enchanting and Paxton is federal.
If someone is right or not enchanting, then he is not unpleasant.
As long as someone is not unpleasant, he is enchanting and lucky.
If Rory is not unpleasant or Paxton is lucky, then Rory is neat.
Peter being unpleasant and Peter being neat are equivalent to Tommy being not enchanting and Paxton being not lucky.
If Hunter is not neat, then Paxton is enchanting. | Hunter is not enchanting. | contradiction |
Rory is neat.
Rory is unpleasant.
Hunter is not unpleasant.
Tommy is right.
Paxton is unpleasant.
Paxton is not neat.
Tommy is lucky.
Hunter is neat.
Paxton is enchanting.
Peter is not right.
Tommy is not enchanting.
Tommy is not federal.Peter being not enchanting is equivalent to Tommy being not neat.
It can be concluded that Tommy is enchanting once knowing that Peter is not lucky or Hunter is federal.
Someone is unpleasant and federal if and only if he is lucky and enchanting.
If someone is not unpleasant and not lucky, then he is both right and not enchanting, and vice versa.
Hunter is right if and only if Rory is not lucky.
If someone who is not neat is also unpleasant, then he is federal.
Paxton is not right if and only if Hunter is enchanting and Paxton is federal.
If someone is right or not enchanting, then he is not unpleasant.
As long as someone is not unpleasant, he is enchanting and lucky.
If Rory is not unpleasant or Paxton is lucky, then Rory is neat.
Peter being unpleasant and Peter being neat are equivalent to Tommy being not enchanting and Paxton being not lucky.
If Hunter is not neat, then Paxton is enchanting. | Tommy is not unpleasant. | self_contradiction |
Rory is neat.
Rory is unpleasant.
Hunter is not unpleasant.
Tommy is right.
Paxton is unpleasant.
Paxton is not neat.
Tommy is lucky.
Hunter is neat.
Paxton is enchanting.
Peter is not right.
Tommy is not enchanting.
Tommy is not federal.Peter being not enchanting is equivalent to Tommy being not neat.
It can be concluded that Tommy is enchanting once knowing that Peter is not lucky or Hunter is federal.
Someone is unpleasant and federal if and only if he is lucky and enchanting.
If someone is not unpleasant and not lucky, then he is both right and not enchanting, and vice versa.
Hunter is right if and only if Rory is not lucky.
If someone who is not neat is also unpleasant, then he is federal.
Paxton is not right if and only if Hunter is enchanting and Paxton is federal.
If someone is right or not enchanting, then he is not unpleasant.
As long as someone is not unpleasant, he is enchanting and lucky.
If Rory is not unpleasant or Paxton is lucky, then Rory is neat.
Peter being unpleasant and Peter being neat are equivalent to Tommy being not enchanting and Paxton being not lucky.
If Hunter is not neat, then Paxton is enchanting. | Paxton is lucky. | entailment |
Rory is neat.
Rory is unpleasant.
Hunter is not unpleasant.
Tommy is right.
Paxton is unpleasant.
Paxton is not neat.
Tommy is lucky.
Hunter is neat.
Paxton is enchanting.
Peter is not right.
Tommy is not enchanting.
Tommy is not federal.Peter being not enchanting is equivalent to Tommy being not neat.
It can be concluded that Tommy is enchanting once knowing that Peter is not lucky or Hunter is federal.
Someone is unpleasant and federal if and only if he is lucky and enchanting.
If someone is not unpleasant and not lucky, then he is both right and not enchanting, and vice versa.
Hunter is right if and only if Rory is not lucky.
If someone who is not neat is also unpleasant, then he is federal.
Paxton is not right if and only if Hunter is enchanting and Paxton is federal.
If someone is right or not enchanting, then he is not unpleasant.
As long as someone is not unpleasant, he is enchanting and lucky.
If Rory is not unpleasant or Paxton is lucky, then Rory is neat.
Peter being unpleasant and Peter being neat are equivalent to Tommy being not enchanting and Paxton being not lucky.
If Hunter is not neat, then Paxton is enchanting. | Peter is not unpleasant. | neutral |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.