premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Camille is hungry.
Vicki is powerful.
Richard is not selfish.
Richard is massive.
Peter is not massive.
Alexis is hungry.
Mark is jealous.
Mark is selfish.
John is powerful.
Camille is jealous.
Richard is powerful.
Peter is not embarrassed.Someone who is eithor powerful or hungry is always not massive.
If all people are not hungry or selfish, then Camille is not jealous.
It can be concluded that John is not selfish once knowing that John is embarrassed.
Someone who is massive is always both not hungry and powerful.
Someone who is massive is always both jealous and not powerful.
It can be concluded that Camille is embarrassed and Mark is not hungry once knowing that Camille is not selfish.
If someone is selfish, then he is both hungry and massive.
If there is at least one people who is massive or not selfish, then Camille is not embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is not jealous or selfish, then Vicki is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not selfish and massive, then Alexis is not jealous.
If Camille is not selfish and Vicki is not embarrassed, then Peter is not massive.
If John is not powerful and Mark is massive, then Mark is not hungry and Richard is not jealous, and vice versa. | Alexis is hungry. | entailment |
Camille is hungry.
Vicki is powerful.
Richard is not selfish.
Richard is massive.
Peter is not massive.
Alexis is hungry.
Mark is jealous.
Mark is selfish.
John is powerful.
Camille is jealous.
Richard is powerful.
Peter is not embarrassed.Someone who is eithor powerful or hungry is always not massive.
If all people are not hungry or selfish, then Camille is not jealous.
It can be concluded that John is not selfish once knowing that John is embarrassed.
Someone who is massive is always both not hungry and powerful.
Someone who is massive is always both jealous and not powerful.
It can be concluded that Camille is embarrassed and Mark is not hungry once knowing that Camille is not selfish.
If someone is selfish, then he is both hungry and massive.
If there is at least one people who is massive or not selfish, then Camille is not embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is not jealous or selfish, then Vicki is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not selfish and massive, then Alexis is not jealous.
If Camille is not selfish and Vicki is not embarrassed, then Peter is not massive.
If John is not powerful and Mark is massive, then Mark is not hungry and Richard is not jealous, and vice versa. | Richard is selfish. | contradiction |
Camille is hungry.
Vicki is powerful.
Richard is not selfish.
Richard is massive.
Peter is not massive.
Alexis is hungry.
Mark is jealous.
Mark is selfish.
John is powerful.
Camille is jealous.
Richard is powerful.
Peter is not embarrassed.Someone who is eithor powerful or hungry is always not massive.
If all people are not hungry or selfish, then Camille is not jealous.
It can be concluded that John is not selfish once knowing that John is embarrassed.
Someone who is massive is always both not hungry and powerful.
Someone who is massive is always both jealous and not powerful.
It can be concluded that Camille is embarrassed and Mark is not hungry once knowing that Camille is not selfish.
If someone is selfish, then he is both hungry and massive.
If there is at least one people who is massive or not selfish, then Camille is not embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is not jealous or selfish, then Vicki is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not selfish and massive, then Alexis is not jealous.
If Camille is not selfish and Vicki is not embarrassed, then Peter is not massive.
If John is not powerful and Mark is massive, then Mark is not hungry and Richard is not jealous, and vice versa. | Alexis is not hungry. | contradiction |
Camille is hungry.
Vicki is powerful.
Richard is not selfish.
Richard is massive.
Peter is not massive.
Alexis is hungry.
Mark is jealous.
Mark is selfish.
John is powerful.
Camille is jealous.
Richard is powerful.
Peter is not embarrassed.Someone who is eithor powerful or hungry is always not massive.
If all people are not hungry or selfish, then Camille is not jealous.
It can be concluded that John is not selfish once knowing that John is embarrassed.
Someone who is massive is always both not hungry and powerful.
Someone who is massive is always both jealous and not powerful.
It can be concluded that Camille is embarrassed and Mark is not hungry once knowing that Camille is not selfish.
If someone is selfish, then he is both hungry and massive.
If there is at least one people who is massive or not selfish, then Camille is not embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is not jealous or selfish, then Vicki is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not selfish and massive, then Alexis is not jealous.
If Camille is not selfish and Vicki is not embarrassed, then Peter is not massive.
If John is not powerful and Mark is massive, then Mark is not hungry and Richard is not jealous, and vice versa. | Richard is hungry. | contradiction |
Camille is hungry.
Vicki is powerful.
Richard is not selfish.
Richard is massive.
Peter is not massive.
Alexis is hungry.
Mark is jealous.
Mark is selfish.
John is powerful.
Camille is jealous.
Richard is powerful.
Peter is not embarrassed.Someone who is eithor powerful or hungry is always not massive.
If all people are not hungry or selfish, then Camille is not jealous.
It can be concluded that John is not selfish once knowing that John is embarrassed.
Someone who is massive is always both not hungry and powerful.
Someone who is massive is always both jealous and not powerful.
It can be concluded that Camille is embarrassed and Mark is not hungry once knowing that Camille is not selfish.
If someone is selfish, then he is both hungry and massive.
If there is at least one people who is massive or not selfish, then Camille is not embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is not jealous or selfish, then Vicki is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not selfish and massive, then Alexis is not jealous.
If Camille is not selfish and Vicki is not embarrassed, then Peter is not massive.
If John is not powerful and Mark is massive, then Mark is not hungry and Richard is not jealous, and vice versa. | John is not massive. | entailment |
Camille is hungry.
Vicki is powerful.
Richard is not selfish.
Richard is massive.
Peter is not massive.
Alexis is hungry.
Mark is jealous.
Mark is selfish.
John is powerful.
Camille is jealous.
Richard is powerful.
Peter is not embarrassed.Someone who is eithor powerful or hungry is always not massive.
If all people are not hungry or selfish, then Camille is not jealous.
It can be concluded that John is not selfish once knowing that John is embarrassed.
Someone who is massive is always both not hungry and powerful.
Someone who is massive is always both jealous and not powerful.
It can be concluded that Camille is embarrassed and Mark is not hungry once knowing that Camille is not selfish.
If someone is selfish, then he is both hungry and massive.
If there is at least one people who is massive or not selfish, then Camille is not embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is not jealous or selfish, then Vicki is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not selfish and massive, then Alexis is not jealous.
If Camille is not selfish and Vicki is not embarrassed, then Peter is not massive.
If John is not powerful and Mark is massive, then Mark is not hungry and Richard is not jealous, and vice versa. | Peter is powerful. | neutral |
Camille is hungry.
Vicki is powerful.
Richard is not selfish.
Richard is massive.
Peter is not massive.
Alexis is hungry.
Mark is jealous.
Mark is selfish.
John is powerful.
Camille is jealous.
Richard is powerful.
Peter is not embarrassed.Someone who is eithor powerful or hungry is always not massive.
If all people are not hungry or selfish, then Camille is not jealous.
It can be concluded that John is not selfish once knowing that John is embarrassed.
Someone who is massive is always both not hungry and powerful.
Someone who is massive is always both jealous and not powerful.
It can be concluded that Camille is embarrassed and Mark is not hungry once knowing that Camille is not selfish.
If someone is selfish, then he is both hungry and massive.
If there is at least one people who is massive or not selfish, then Camille is not embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is not jealous or selfish, then Vicki is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not selfish and massive, then Alexis is not jealous.
If Camille is not selfish and Vicki is not embarrassed, then Peter is not massive.
If John is not powerful and Mark is massive, then Mark is not hungry and Richard is not jealous, and vice versa. | Richard is not selfish. | entailment |
Camille is hungry.
Vicki is powerful.
Richard is not selfish.
Richard is massive.
Peter is not massive.
Alexis is hungry.
Mark is jealous.
Mark is selfish.
John is powerful.
Camille is jealous.
Richard is powerful.
Peter is not embarrassed.Someone who is eithor powerful or hungry is always not massive.
If all people are not hungry or selfish, then Camille is not jealous.
It can be concluded that John is not selfish once knowing that John is embarrassed.
Someone who is massive is always both not hungry and powerful.
Someone who is massive is always both jealous and not powerful.
It can be concluded that Camille is embarrassed and Mark is not hungry once knowing that Camille is not selfish.
If someone is selfish, then he is both hungry and massive.
If there is at least one people who is massive or not selfish, then Camille is not embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is not jealous or selfish, then Vicki is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not selfish and massive, then Alexis is not jealous.
If Camille is not selfish and Vicki is not embarrassed, then Peter is not massive.
If John is not powerful and Mark is massive, then Mark is not hungry and Richard is not jealous, and vice versa. | Richard is jealous. | entailment |
Camille is hungry.
Vicki is powerful.
Richard is not selfish.
Richard is massive.
Peter is not massive.
Alexis is hungry.
Mark is jealous.
Mark is selfish.
John is powerful.
Camille is jealous.
Richard is powerful.
Peter is not embarrassed.Someone who is eithor powerful or hungry is always not massive.
If all people are not hungry or selfish, then Camille is not jealous.
It can be concluded that John is not selfish once knowing that John is embarrassed.
Someone who is massive is always both not hungry and powerful.
Someone who is massive is always both jealous and not powerful.
It can be concluded that Camille is embarrassed and Mark is not hungry once knowing that Camille is not selfish.
If someone is selfish, then he is both hungry and massive.
If there is at least one people who is massive or not selfish, then Camille is not embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is not jealous or selfish, then Vicki is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not selfish and massive, then Alexis is not jealous.
If Camille is not selfish and Vicki is not embarrassed, then Peter is not massive.
If John is not powerful and Mark is massive, then Mark is not hungry and Richard is not jealous, and vice versa. | Camille is not jealous. | contradiction |
Camille is hungry.
Vicki is powerful.
Richard is not selfish.
Richard is massive.
Peter is not massive.
Alexis is hungry.
Mark is jealous.
Mark is selfish.
John is powerful.
Camille is jealous.
Richard is powerful.
Peter is not embarrassed.Someone who is eithor powerful or hungry is always not massive.
If all people are not hungry or selfish, then Camille is not jealous.
It can be concluded that John is not selfish once knowing that John is embarrassed.
Someone who is massive is always both not hungry and powerful.
Someone who is massive is always both jealous and not powerful.
It can be concluded that Camille is embarrassed and Mark is not hungry once knowing that Camille is not selfish.
If someone is selfish, then he is both hungry and massive.
If there is at least one people who is massive or not selfish, then Camille is not embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is not jealous or selfish, then Vicki is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not selfish and massive, then Alexis is not jealous.
If Camille is not selfish and Vicki is not embarrassed, then Peter is not massive.
If John is not powerful and Mark is massive, then Mark is not hungry and Richard is not jealous, and vice versa. | Richard is not powerful. | self_contradiction |
Camille is hungry.
Vicki is powerful.
Richard is not selfish.
Richard is massive.
Peter is not massive.
Alexis is hungry.
Mark is jealous.
Mark is selfish.
John is powerful.
Camille is jealous.
Richard is powerful.
Peter is not embarrassed.Someone who is eithor powerful or hungry is always not massive.
If all people are not hungry or selfish, then Camille is not jealous.
It can be concluded that John is not selfish once knowing that John is embarrassed.
Someone who is massive is always both not hungry and powerful.
Someone who is massive is always both jealous and not powerful.
It can be concluded that Camille is embarrassed and Mark is not hungry once knowing that Camille is not selfish.
If someone is selfish, then he is both hungry and massive.
If there is at least one people who is massive or not selfish, then Camille is not embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is not jealous or selfish, then Vicki is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not selfish and massive, then Alexis is not jealous.
If Camille is not selfish and Vicki is not embarrassed, then Peter is not massive.
If John is not powerful and Mark is massive, then Mark is not hungry and Richard is not jealous, and vice versa. | Camille is jealous. | entailment |
Camille is hungry.
Vicki is powerful.
Richard is not selfish.
Richard is massive.
Peter is not massive.
Alexis is hungry.
Mark is jealous.
Mark is selfish.
John is powerful.
Camille is jealous.
Richard is powerful.
Peter is not embarrassed.Someone who is eithor powerful or hungry is always not massive.
If all people are not hungry or selfish, then Camille is not jealous.
It can be concluded that John is not selfish once knowing that John is embarrassed.
Someone who is massive is always both not hungry and powerful.
Someone who is massive is always both jealous and not powerful.
It can be concluded that Camille is embarrassed and Mark is not hungry once knowing that Camille is not selfish.
If someone is selfish, then he is both hungry and massive.
If there is at least one people who is massive or not selfish, then Camille is not embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is not jealous or selfish, then Vicki is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not selfish and massive, then Alexis is not jealous.
If Camille is not selfish and Vicki is not embarrassed, then Peter is not massive.
If John is not powerful and Mark is massive, then Mark is not hungry and Richard is not jealous, and vice versa. | Camille is selfish. | neutral |
Camille is hungry.
Vicki is powerful.
Richard is not selfish.
Richard is massive.
Peter is not massive.
Alexis is hungry.
Mark is jealous.
Mark is selfish.
John is powerful.
Camille is jealous.
Richard is powerful.
Peter is not embarrassed.Someone who is eithor powerful or hungry is always not massive.
If all people are not hungry or selfish, then Camille is not jealous.
It can be concluded that John is not selfish once knowing that John is embarrassed.
Someone who is massive is always both not hungry and powerful.
Someone who is massive is always both jealous and not powerful.
It can be concluded that Camille is embarrassed and Mark is not hungry once knowing that Camille is not selfish.
If someone is selfish, then he is both hungry and massive.
If there is at least one people who is massive or not selfish, then Camille is not embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is not jealous or selfish, then Vicki is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not selfish and massive, then Alexis is not jealous.
If Camille is not selfish and Vicki is not embarrassed, then Peter is not massive.
If John is not powerful and Mark is massive, then Mark is not hungry and Richard is not jealous, and vice versa. | John is jealous. | neutral |
Camille is hungry.
Vicki is powerful.
Richard is not selfish.
Richard is massive.
Peter is not massive.
Alexis is hungry.
Mark is jealous.
Mark is selfish.
John is powerful.
Camille is jealous.
Richard is powerful.
Peter is not embarrassed.Someone who is eithor powerful or hungry is always not massive.
If all people are not hungry or selfish, then Camille is not jealous.
It can be concluded that John is not selfish once knowing that John is embarrassed.
Someone who is massive is always both not hungry and powerful.
Someone who is massive is always both jealous and not powerful.
It can be concluded that Camille is embarrassed and Mark is not hungry once knowing that Camille is not selfish.
If someone is selfish, then he is both hungry and massive.
If there is at least one people who is massive or not selfish, then Camille is not embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is not jealous or selfish, then Vicki is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not selfish and massive, then Alexis is not jealous.
If Camille is not selfish and Vicki is not embarrassed, then Peter is not massive.
If John is not powerful and Mark is massive, then Mark is not hungry and Richard is not jealous, and vice versa. | Mark is powerful. | self_contradiction |
Camille is hungry.
Vicki is powerful.
Richard is not selfish.
Richard is massive.
Peter is not massive.
Alexis is hungry.
Mark is jealous.
Mark is selfish.
John is powerful.
Camille is jealous.
Richard is powerful.
Peter is not embarrassed.Someone who is eithor powerful or hungry is always not massive.
If all people are not hungry or selfish, then Camille is not jealous.
It can be concluded that John is not selfish once knowing that John is embarrassed.
Someone who is massive is always both not hungry and powerful.
Someone who is massive is always both jealous and not powerful.
It can be concluded that Camille is embarrassed and Mark is not hungry once knowing that Camille is not selfish.
If someone is selfish, then he is both hungry and massive.
If there is at least one people who is massive or not selfish, then Camille is not embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is not jealous or selfish, then Vicki is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not selfish and massive, then Alexis is not jealous.
If Camille is not selfish and Vicki is not embarrassed, then Peter is not massive.
If John is not powerful and Mark is massive, then Mark is not hungry and Richard is not jealous, and vice versa. | Mark is not jealous. | contradiction |
Camille is hungry.
Vicki is powerful.
Richard is not selfish.
Richard is massive.
Peter is not massive.
Alexis is hungry.
Mark is jealous.
Mark is selfish.
John is powerful.
Camille is jealous.
Richard is powerful.
Peter is not embarrassed.Someone who is eithor powerful or hungry is always not massive.
If all people are not hungry or selfish, then Camille is not jealous.
It can be concluded that John is not selfish once knowing that John is embarrassed.
Someone who is massive is always both not hungry and powerful.
Someone who is massive is always both jealous and not powerful.
It can be concluded that Camille is embarrassed and Mark is not hungry once knowing that Camille is not selfish.
If someone is selfish, then he is both hungry and massive.
If there is at least one people who is massive or not selfish, then Camille is not embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is not jealous or selfish, then Vicki is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not selfish and massive, then Alexis is not jealous.
If Camille is not selfish and Vicki is not embarrassed, then Peter is not massive.
If John is not powerful and Mark is massive, then Mark is not hungry and Richard is not jealous, and vice versa. | Mark is not hungry. | self_contradiction |
Camille is hungry.
Vicki is powerful.
Richard is not selfish.
Richard is massive.
Peter is not massive.
Alexis is hungry.
Mark is jealous.
Mark is selfish.
John is powerful.
Camille is jealous.
Richard is powerful.
Peter is not embarrassed.Someone who is eithor powerful or hungry is always not massive.
If all people are not hungry or selfish, then Camille is not jealous.
It can be concluded that John is not selfish once knowing that John is embarrassed.
Someone who is massive is always both not hungry and powerful.
Someone who is massive is always both jealous and not powerful.
It can be concluded that Camille is embarrassed and Mark is not hungry once knowing that Camille is not selfish.
If someone is selfish, then he is both hungry and massive.
If there is at least one people who is massive or not selfish, then Camille is not embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is not jealous or selfish, then Vicki is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not selfish and massive, then Alexis is not jealous.
If Camille is not selfish and Vicki is not embarrassed, then Peter is not massive.
If John is not powerful and Mark is massive, then Mark is not hungry and Richard is not jealous, and vice versa. | Peter is not jealous. | neutral |
Camille is hungry.
Vicki is powerful.
Richard is not selfish.
Richard is massive.
Peter is not massive.
Alexis is hungry.
Mark is jealous.
Mark is selfish.
John is powerful.
Camille is jealous.
Richard is powerful.
Peter is not embarrassed.Someone who is eithor powerful or hungry is always not massive.
If all people are not hungry or selfish, then Camille is not jealous.
It can be concluded that John is not selfish once knowing that John is embarrassed.
Someone who is massive is always both not hungry and powerful.
Someone who is massive is always both jealous and not powerful.
It can be concluded that Camille is embarrassed and Mark is not hungry once knowing that Camille is not selfish.
If someone is selfish, then he is both hungry and massive.
If there is at least one people who is massive or not selfish, then Camille is not embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is not jealous or selfish, then Vicki is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not selfish and massive, then Alexis is not jealous.
If Camille is not selfish and Vicki is not embarrassed, then Peter is not massive.
If John is not powerful and Mark is massive, then Mark is not hungry and Richard is not jealous, and vice versa. | Richard is not massive. | self_contradiction |
Camille is hungry.
Vicki is powerful.
Richard is not selfish.
Richard is massive.
Peter is not massive.
Alexis is hungry.
Mark is jealous.
Mark is selfish.
John is powerful.
Camille is jealous.
Richard is powerful.
Peter is not embarrassed.Someone who is eithor powerful or hungry is always not massive.
If all people are not hungry or selfish, then Camille is not jealous.
It can be concluded that John is not selfish once knowing that John is embarrassed.
Someone who is massive is always both not hungry and powerful.
Someone who is massive is always both jealous and not powerful.
It can be concluded that Camille is embarrassed and Mark is not hungry once knowing that Camille is not selfish.
If someone is selfish, then he is both hungry and massive.
If there is at least one people who is massive or not selfish, then Camille is not embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is not jealous or selfish, then Vicki is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not selfish and massive, then Alexis is not jealous.
If Camille is not selfish and Vicki is not embarrassed, then Peter is not massive.
If John is not powerful and Mark is massive, then Mark is not hungry and Richard is not jealous, and vice versa. | Alexis is powerful. | neutral |
Camille is hungry.
Vicki is powerful.
Richard is not selfish.
Richard is massive.
Peter is not massive.
Alexis is hungry.
Mark is jealous.
Mark is selfish.
John is powerful.
Camille is jealous.
Richard is powerful.
Peter is not embarrassed.Someone who is eithor powerful or hungry is always not massive.
If all people are not hungry or selfish, then Camille is not jealous.
It can be concluded that John is not selfish once knowing that John is embarrassed.
Someone who is massive is always both not hungry and powerful.
Someone who is massive is always both jealous and not powerful.
It can be concluded that Camille is embarrassed and Mark is not hungry once knowing that Camille is not selfish.
If someone is selfish, then he is both hungry and massive.
If there is at least one people who is massive or not selfish, then Camille is not embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is not jealous or selfish, then Vicki is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not selfish and massive, then Alexis is not jealous.
If Camille is not selfish and Vicki is not embarrassed, then Peter is not massive.
If John is not powerful and Mark is massive, then Mark is not hungry and Richard is not jealous, and vice versa. | Mark is not powerful. | self_contradiction |
Bruce is compassionate.
Coleman is not compassionate.
Leslie is not dynamic.
Truman is brown.
Bethany is compassionate.
Vicki is beautiful.
Lloyd is historical.
Leslie is not beautiful.
Truman is historical.
Bruce is not dynamic.
Lloyd is beautiful.
Truman is dynamic.If someone is historical, then he is beautiful, and vice versa.
Someone who is not historical is always not dynamic.
As long as someone is compassionate, he is dynamic and old-fashioned.
Someone being both not beautiful and dynamic is equivalent to being not compassionate.
If Vicki is historical, then Coleman is brown and Leslie is not beautiful, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Leslie is historical once knowing that Vicki is old-fashioned and Vicki is beautiful.
Vicki being not historical or Truman being old-fashioned implies that Leslie is dynamic.
If someone is compassionate and old-fashioned, then he is not historical, and vice versa.
If Vicki is not brown, then Coleman is beautiful, and vice versa.
If someone is not brown, then he is historical.
If someone is beautiful and not brown, then he is not old-fashioned, and vice versa.
Leslie is not beautiful if and only if Truman is compassionate. | Coleman is not historical. | neutral |
Bruce is compassionate.
Coleman is not compassionate.
Leslie is not dynamic.
Truman is brown.
Bethany is compassionate.
Vicki is beautiful.
Lloyd is historical.
Leslie is not beautiful.
Truman is historical.
Bruce is not dynamic.
Lloyd is beautiful.
Truman is dynamic.If someone is historical, then he is beautiful, and vice versa.
Someone who is not historical is always not dynamic.
As long as someone is compassionate, he is dynamic and old-fashioned.
Someone being both not beautiful and dynamic is equivalent to being not compassionate.
If Vicki is historical, then Coleman is brown and Leslie is not beautiful, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Leslie is historical once knowing that Vicki is old-fashioned and Vicki is beautiful.
Vicki being not historical or Truman being old-fashioned implies that Leslie is dynamic.
If someone is compassionate and old-fashioned, then he is not historical, and vice versa.
If Vicki is not brown, then Coleman is beautiful, and vice versa.
If someone is not brown, then he is historical.
If someone is beautiful and not brown, then he is not old-fashioned, and vice versa.
Leslie is not beautiful if and only if Truman is compassionate. | Vicki is not historical. | contradiction |
Bruce is compassionate.
Coleman is not compassionate.
Leslie is not dynamic.
Truman is brown.
Bethany is compassionate.
Vicki is beautiful.
Lloyd is historical.
Leslie is not beautiful.
Truman is historical.
Bruce is not dynamic.
Lloyd is beautiful.
Truman is dynamic.If someone is historical, then he is beautiful, and vice versa.
Someone who is not historical is always not dynamic.
As long as someone is compassionate, he is dynamic and old-fashioned.
Someone being both not beautiful and dynamic is equivalent to being not compassionate.
If Vicki is historical, then Coleman is brown and Leslie is not beautiful, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Leslie is historical once knowing that Vicki is old-fashioned and Vicki is beautiful.
Vicki being not historical or Truman being old-fashioned implies that Leslie is dynamic.
If someone is compassionate and old-fashioned, then he is not historical, and vice versa.
If Vicki is not brown, then Coleman is beautiful, and vice versa.
If someone is not brown, then he is historical.
If someone is beautiful and not brown, then he is not old-fashioned, and vice versa.
Leslie is not beautiful if and only if Truman is compassionate. | Lloyd is dynamic. | neutral |
Bruce is compassionate.
Coleman is not compassionate.
Leslie is not dynamic.
Truman is brown.
Bethany is compassionate.
Vicki is beautiful.
Lloyd is historical.
Leslie is not beautiful.
Truman is historical.
Bruce is not dynamic.
Lloyd is beautiful.
Truman is dynamic.If someone is historical, then he is beautiful, and vice versa.
Someone who is not historical is always not dynamic.
As long as someone is compassionate, he is dynamic and old-fashioned.
Someone being both not beautiful and dynamic is equivalent to being not compassionate.
If Vicki is historical, then Coleman is brown and Leslie is not beautiful, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Leslie is historical once knowing that Vicki is old-fashioned and Vicki is beautiful.
Vicki being not historical or Truman being old-fashioned implies that Leslie is dynamic.
If someone is compassionate and old-fashioned, then he is not historical, and vice versa.
If Vicki is not brown, then Coleman is beautiful, and vice versa.
If someone is not brown, then he is historical.
If someone is beautiful and not brown, then he is not old-fashioned, and vice versa.
Leslie is not beautiful if and only if Truman is compassionate. | Bruce is historical. | contradiction |
Bruce is compassionate.
Coleman is not compassionate.
Leslie is not dynamic.
Truman is brown.
Bethany is compassionate.
Vicki is beautiful.
Lloyd is historical.
Leslie is not beautiful.
Truman is historical.
Bruce is not dynamic.
Lloyd is beautiful.
Truman is dynamic.If someone is historical, then he is beautiful, and vice versa.
Someone who is not historical is always not dynamic.
As long as someone is compassionate, he is dynamic and old-fashioned.
Someone being both not beautiful and dynamic is equivalent to being not compassionate.
If Vicki is historical, then Coleman is brown and Leslie is not beautiful, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Leslie is historical once knowing that Vicki is old-fashioned and Vicki is beautiful.
Vicki being not historical or Truman being old-fashioned implies that Leslie is dynamic.
If someone is compassionate and old-fashioned, then he is not historical, and vice versa.
If Vicki is not brown, then Coleman is beautiful, and vice versa.
If someone is not brown, then he is historical.
If someone is beautiful and not brown, then he is not old-fashioned, and vice versa.
Leslie is not beautiful if and only if Truman is compassionate. | Bethany is not dynamic. | self_contradiction |
Bruce is compassionate.
Coleman is not compassionate.
Leslie is not dynamic.
Truman is brown.
Bethany is compassionate.
Vicki is beautiful.
Lloyd is historical.
Leslie is not beautiful.
Truman is historical.
Bruce is not dynamic.
Lloyd is beautiful.
Truman is dynamic.If someone is historical, then he is beautiful, and vice versa.
Someone who is not historical is always not dynamic.
As long as someone is compassionate, he is dynamic and old-fashioned.
Someone being both not beautiful and dynamic is equivalent to being not compassionate.
If Vicki is historical, then Coleman is brown and Leslie is not beautiful, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Leslie is historical once knowing that Vicki is old-fashioned and Vicki is beautiful.
Vicki being not historical or Truman being old-fashioned implies that Leslie is dynamic.
If someone is compassionate and old-fashioned, then he is not historical, and vice versa.
If Vicki is not brown, then Coleman is beautiful, and vice versa.
If someone is not brown, then he is historical.
If someone is beautiful and not brown, then he is not old-fashioned, and vice versa.
Leslie is not beautiful if and only if Truman is compassionate. | Lloyd is historical. | entailment |
Bruce is compassionate.
Coleman is not compassionate.
Leslie is not dynamic.
Truman is brown.
Bethany is compassionate.
Vicki is beautiful.
Lloyd is historical.
Leslie is not beautiful.
Truman is historical.
Bruce is not dynamic.
Lloyd is beautiful.
Truman is dynamic.If someone is historical, then he is beautiful, and vice versa.
Someone who is not historical is always not dynamic.
As long as someone is compassionate, he is dynamic and old-fashioned.
Someone being both not beautiful and dynamic is equivalent to being not compassionate.
If Vicki is historical, then Coleman is brown and Leslie is not beautiful, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Leslie is historical once knowing that Vicki is old-fashioned and Vicki is beautiful.
Vicki being not historical or Truman being old-fashioned implies that Leslie is dynamic.
If someone is compassionate and old-fashioned, then he is not historical, and vice versa.
If Vicki is not brown, then Coleman is beautiful, and vice versa.
If someone is not brown, then he is historical.
If someone is beautiful and not brown, then he is not old-fashioned, and vice versa.
Leslie is not beautiful if and only if Truman is compassionate. | Lloyd is not dynamic. | neutral |
Bruce is compassionate.
Coleman is not compassionate.
Leslie is not dynamic.
Truman is brown.
Bethany is compassionate.
Vicki is beautiful.
Lloyd is historical.
Leslie is not beautiful.
Truman is historical.
Bruce is not dynamic.
Lloyd is beautiful.
Truman is dynamic.If someone is historical, then he is beautiful, and vice versa.
Someone who is not historical is always not dynamic.
As long as someone is compassionate, he is dynamic and old-fashioned.
Someone being both not beautiful and dynamic is equivalent to being not compassionate.
If Vicki is historical, then Coleman is brown and Leslie is not beautiful, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Leslie is historical once knowing that Vicki is old-fashioned and Vicki is beautiful.
Vicki being not historical or Truman being old-fashioned implies that Leslie is dynamic.
If someone is compassionate and old-fashioned, then he is not historical, and vice versa.
If Vicki is not brown, then Coleman is beautiful, and vice versa.
If someone is not brown, then he is historical.
If someone is beautiful and not brown, then he is not old-fashioned, and vice versa.
Leslie is not beautiful if and only if Truman is compassionate. | Bethany is not beautiful. | neutral |
Bruce is compassionate.
Coleman is not compassionate.
Leslie is not dynamic.
Truman is brown.
Bethany is compassionate.
Vicki is beautiful.
Lloyd is historical.
Leslie is not beautiful.
Truman is historical.
Bruce is not dynamic.
Lloyd is beautiful.
Truman is dynamic.If someone is historical, then he is beautiful, and vice versa.
Someone who is not historical is always not dynamic.
As long as someone is compassionate, he is dynamic and old-fashioned.
Someone being both not beautiful and dynamic is equivalent to being not compassionate.
If Vicki is historical, then Coleman is brown and Leslie is not beautiful, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Leslie is historical once knowing that Vicki is old-fashioned and Vicki is beautiful.
Vicki being not historical or Truman being old-fashioned implies that Leslie is dynamic.
If someone is compassionate and old-fashioned, then he is not historical, and vice versa.
If Vicki is not brown, then Coleman is beautiful, and vice versa.
If someone is not brown, then he is historical.
If someone is beautiful and not brown, then he is not old-fashioned, and vice versa.
Leslie is not beautiful if and only if Truman is compassionate. | Truman is beautiful. | entailment |
Bruce is compassionate.
Coleman is not compassionate.
Leslie is not dynamic.
Truman is brown.
Bethany is compassionate.
Vicki is beautiful.
Lloyd is historical.
Leslie is not beautiful.
Truman is historical.
Bruce is not dynamic.
Lloyd is beautiful.
Truman is dynamic.If someone is historical, then he is beautiful, and vice versa.
Someone who is not historical is always not dynamic.
As long as someone is compassionate, he is dynamic and old-fashioned.
Someone being both not beautiful and dynamic is equivalent to being not compassionate.
If Vicki is historical, then Coleman is brown and Leslie is not beautiful, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Leslie is historical once knowing that Vicki is old-fashioned and Vicki is beautiful.
Vicki being not historical or Truman being old-fashioned implies that Leslie is dynamic.
If someone is compassionate and old-fashioned, then he is not historical, and vice versa.
If Vicki is not brown, then Coleman is beautiful, and vice versa.
If someone is not brown, then he is historical.
If someone is beautiful and not brown, then he is not old-fashioned, and vice versa.
Leslie is not beautiful if and only if Truman is compassionate. | Truman is not dynamic. | self_contradiction |
Bruce is compassionate.
Coleman is not compassionate.
Leslie is not dynamic.
Truman is brown.
Bethany is compassionate.
Vicki is beautiful.
Lloyd is historical.
Leslie is not beautiful.
Truman is historical.
Bruce is not dynamic.
Lloyd is beautiful.
Truman is dynamic.If someone is historical, then he is beautiful, and vice versa.
Someone who is not historical is always not dynamic.
As long as someone is compassionate, he is dynamic and old-fashioned.
Someone being both not beautiful and dynamic is equivalent to being not compassionate.
If Vicki is historical, then Coleman is brown and Leslie is not beautiful, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Leslie is historical once knowing that Vicki is old-fashioned and Vicki is beautiful.
Vicki being not historical or Truman being old-fashioned implies that Leslie is dynamic.
If someone is compassionate and old-fashioned, then he is not historical, and vice versa.
If Vicki is not brown, then Coleman is beautiful, and vice versa.
If someone is not brown, then he is historical.
If someone is beautiful and not brown, then he is not old-fashioned, and vice versa.
Leslie is not beautiful if and only if Truman is compassionate. | Vicki is historical. | entailment |
Bruce is compassionate.
Coleman is not compassionate.
Leslie is not dynamic.
Truman is brown.
Bethany is compassionate.
Vicki is beautiful.
Lloyd is historical.
Leslie is not beautiful.
Truman is historical.
Bruce is not dynamic.
Lloyd is beautiful.
Truman is dynamic.If someone is historical, then he is beautiful, and vice versa.
Someone who is not historical is always not dynamic.
As long as someone is compassionate, he is dynamic and old-fashioned.
Someone being both not beautiful and dynamic is equivalent to being not compassionate.
If Vicki is historical, then Coleman is brown and Leslie is not beautiful, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Leslie is historical once knowing that Vicki is old-fashioned and Vicki is beautiful.
Vicki being not historical or Truman being old-fashioned implies that Leslie is dynamic.
If someone is compassionate and old-fashioned, then he is not historical, and vice versa.
If Vicki is not brown, then Coleman is beautiful, and vice versa.
If someone is not brown, then he is historical.
If someone is beautiful and not brown, then he is not old-fashioned, and vice versa.
Leslie is not beautiful if and only if Truman is compassionate. | Truman is not brown. | contradiction |
Bruce is compassionate.
Coleman is not compassionate.
Leslie is not dynamic.
Truman is brown.
Bethany is compassionate.
Vicki is beautiful.
Lloyd is historical.
Leslie is not beautiful.
Truman is historical.
Bruce is not dynamic.
Lloyd is beautiful.
Truman is dynamic.If someone is historical, then he is beautiful, and vice versa.
Someone who is not historical is always not dynamic.
As long as someone is compassionate, he is dynamic and old-fashioned.
Someone being both not beautiful and dynamic is equivalent to being not compassionate.
If Vicki is historical, then Coleman is brown and Leslie is not beautiful, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Leslie is historical once knowing that Vicki is old-fashioned and Vicki is beautiful.
Vicki being not historical or Truman being old-fashioned implies that Leslie is dynamic.
If someone is compassionate and old-fashioned, then he is not historical, and vice versa.
If Vicki is not brown, then Coleman is beautiful, and vice versa.
If someone is not brown, then he is historical.
If someone is beautiful and not brown, then he is not old-fashioned, and vice versa.
Leslie is not beautiful if and only if Truman is compassionate. | Bethany is beautiful. | neutral |
Bruce is compassionate.
Coleman is not compassionate.
Leslie is not dynamic.
Truman is brown.
Bethany is compassionate.
Vicki is beautiful.
Lloyd is historical.
Leslie is not beautiful.
Truman is historical.
Bruce is not dynamic.
Lloyd is beautiful.
Truman is dynamic.If someone is historical, then he is beautiful, and vice versa.
Someone who is not historical is always not dynamic.
As long as someone is compassionate, he is dynamic and old-fashioned.
Someone being both not beautiful and dynamic is equivalent to being not compassionate.
If Vicki is historical, then Coleman is brown and Leslie is not beautiful, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Leslie is historical once knowing that Vicki is old-fashioned and Vicki is beautiful.
Vicki being not historical or Truman being old-fashioned implies that Leslie is dynamic.
If someone is compassionate and old-fashioned, then he is not historical, and vice versa.
If Vicki is not brown, then Coleman is beautiful, and vice versa.
If someone is not brown, then he is historical.
If someone is beautiful and not brown, then he is not old-fashioned, and vice versa.
Leslie is not beautiful if and only if Truman is compassionate. | Leslie is not dynamic. | self_contradiction |
Bruce is compassionate.
Coleman is not compassionate.
Leslie is not dynamic.
Truman is brown.
Bethany is compassionate.
Vicki is beautiful.
Lloyd is historical.
Leslie is not beautiful.
Truman is historical.
Bruce is not dynamic.
Lloyd is beautiful.
Truman is dynamic.If someone is historical, then he is beautiful, and vice versa.
Someone who is not historical is always not dynamic.
As long as someone is compassionate, he is dynamic and old-fashioned.
Someone being both not beautiful and dynamic is equivalent to being not compassionate.
If Vicki is historical, then Coleman is brown and Leslie is not beautiful, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Leslie is historical once knowing that Vicki is old-fashioned and Vicki is beautiful.
Vicki being not historical or Truman being old-fashioned implies that Leslie is dynamic.
If someone is compassionate and old-fashioned, then he is not historical, and vice versa.
If Vicki is not brown, then Coleman is beautiful, and vice versa.
If someone is not brown, then he is historical.
If someone is beautiful and not brown, then he is not old-fashioned, and vice versa.
Leslie is not beautiful if and only if Truman is compassionate. | Coleman is dynamic. | entailment |
Bruce is compassionate.
Coleman is not compassionate.
Leslie is not dynamic.
Truman is brown.
Bethany is compassionate.
Vicki is beautiful.
Lloyd is historical.
Leslie is not beautiful.
Truman is historical.
Bruce is not dynamic.
Lloyd is beautiful.
Truman is dynamic.If someone is historical, then he is beautiful, and vice versa.
Someone who is not historical is always not dynamic.
As long as someone is compassionate, he is dynamic and old-fashioned.
Someone being both not beautiful and dynamic is equivalent to being not compassionate.
If Vicki is historical, then Coleman is brown and Leslie is not beautiful, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Leslie is historical once knowing that Vicki is old-fashioned and Vicki is beautiful.
Vicki being not historical or Truman being old-fashioned implies that Leslie is dynamic.
If someone is compassionate and old-fashioned, then he is not historical, and vice versa.
If Vicki is not brown, then Coleman is beautiful, and vice versa.
If someone is not brown, then he is historical.
If someone is beautiful and not brown, then he is not old-fashioned, and vice versa.
Leslie is not beautiful if and only if Truman is compassionate. | Coleman is not dynamic. | contradiction |
Bruce is compassionate.
Coleman is not compassionate.
Leslie is not dynamic.
Truman is brown.
Bethany is compassionate.
Vicki is beautiful.
Lloyd is historical.
Leslie is not beautiful.
Truman is historical.
Bruce is not dynamic.
Lloyd is beautiful.
Truman is dynamic.If someone is historical, then he is beautiful, and vice versa.
Someone who is not historical is always not dynamic.
As long as someone is compassionate, he is dynamic and old-fashioned.
Someone being both not beautiful and dynamic is equivalent to being not compassionate.
If Vicki is historical, then Coleman is brown and Leslie is not beautiful, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Leslie is historical once knowing that Vicki is old-fashioned and Vicki is beautiful.
Vicki being not historical or Truman being old-fashioned implies that Leslie is dynamic.
If someone is compassionate and old-fashioned, then he is not historical, and vice versa.
If Vicki is not brown, then Coleman is beautiful, and vice versa.
If someone is not brown, then he is historical.
If someone is beautiful and not brown, then he is not old-fashioned, and vice versa.
Leslie is not beautiful if and only if Truman is compassionate. | Truman is dynamic. | self_contradiction |
Bruce is compassionate.
Coleman is not compassionate.
Leslie is not dynamic.
Truman is brown.
Bethany is compassionate.
Vicki is beautiful.
Lloyd is historical.
Leslie is not beautiful.
Truman is historical.
Bruce is not dynamic.
Lloyd is beautiful.
Truman is dynamic.If someone is historical, then he is beautiful, and vice versa.
Someone who is not historical is always not dynamic.
As long as someone is compassionate, he is dynamic and old-fashioned.
Someone being both not beautiful and dynamic is equivalent to being not compassionate.
If Vicki is historical, then Coleman is brown and Leslie is not beautiful, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Leslie is historical once knowing that Vicki is old-fashioned and Vicki is beautiful.
Vicki being not historical or Truman being old-fashioned implies that Leslie is dynamic.
If someone is compassionate and old-fashioned, then he is not historical, and vice versa.
If Vicki is not brown, then Coleman is beautiful, and vice versa.
If someone is not brown, then he is historical.
If someone is beautiful and not brown, then he is not old-fashioned, and vice versa.
Leslie is not beautiful if and only if Truman is compassionate. | Vicki is beautiful. | entailment |
Bruce is compassionate.
Coleman is not compassionate.
Leslie is not dynamic.
Truman is brown.
Bethany is compassionate.
Vicki is beautiful.
Lloyd is historical.
Leslie is not beautiful.
Truman is historical.
Bruce is not dynamic.
Lloyd is beautiful.
Truman is dynamic.If someone is historical, then he is beautiful, and vice versa.
Someone who is not historical is always not dynamic.
As long as someone is compassionate, he is dynamic and old-fashioned.
Someone being both not beautiful and dynamic is equivalent to being not compassionate.
If Vicki is historical, then Coleman is brown and Leslie is not beautiful, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Leslie is historical once knowing that Vicki is old-fashioned and Vicki is beautiful.
Vicki being not historical or Truman being old-fashioned implies that Leslie is dynamic.
If someone is compassionate and old-fashioned, then he is not historical, and vice versa.
If Vicki is not brown, then Coleman is beautiful, and vice versa.
If someone is not brown, then he is historical.
If someone is beautiful and not brown, then he is not old-fashioned, and vice versa.
Leslie is not beautiful if and only if Truman is compassionate. | Truman is not historical. | self_contradiction |
Bruce is compassionate.
Coleman is not compassionate.
Leslie is not dynamic.
Truman is brown.
Bethany is compassionate.
Vicki is beautiful.
Lloyd is historical.
Leslie is not beautiful.
Truman is historical.
Bruce is not dynamic.
Lloyd is beautiful.
Truman is dynamic.If someone is historical, then he is beautiful, and vice versa.
Someone who is not historical is always not dynamic.
As long as someone is compassionate, he is dynamic and old-fashioned.
Someone being both not beautiful and dynamic is equivalent to being not compassionate.
If Vicki is historical, then Coleman is brown and Leslie is not beautiful, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Leslie is historical once knowing that Vicki is old-fashioned and Vicki is beautiful.
Vicki being not historical or Truman being old-fashioned implies that Leslie is dynamic.
If someone is compassionate and old-fashioned, then he is not historical, and vice versa.
If Vicki is not brown, then Coleman is beautiful, and vice versa.
If someone is not brown, then he is historical.
If someone is beautiful and not brown, then he is not old-fashioned, and vice versa.
Leslie is not beautiful if and only if Truman is compassionate. | Coleman is beautiful. | contradiction |
Ian is famous.
James is famous.
James is horrible.
Herbert is additional.
Blanche is itchy.
Albern is itchy.
John is confident.
Ian is remarkable.
John is not famous.
Sean is famous.
Herbert is remarkable.
Sean is confident.If Ian is not horrible and Blanche is additional, then James is not itchy.
It can be concluded that Ian is horrible once knowing that James is famous.
If someone is famous, then he is additional, and vice versa.
James being not horrible and James being not itchy imply that John is additional.
Someone is not horrible if and only if he is remarkable.
If there is at least one people who is not horrible or itchy, then John is famous.
As long as someone is not confident, he is not famous and itchy.
It can be concluded that John is not confident once knowing that Ian is horrible.
If someone is not confident or he is not additional, then he is famous.
Albern is horrible if and only if Ian is not itchy and James is additional.
Sean being itchy implies that Sean is not remarkable.
It can be concluded that Herbert is not itchy and James is not remarkable once knowing that Herbert is additional. | John is famous. | self_contradiction |
Ian is famous.
James is famous.
James is horrible.
Herbert is additional.
Blanche is itchy.
Albern is itchy.
John is confident.
Ian is remarkable.
John is not famous.
Sean is famous.
Herbert is remarkable.
Sean is confident.If Ian is not horrible and Blanche is additional, then James is not itchy.
It can be concluded that Ian is horrible once knowing that James is famous.
If someone is famous, then he is additional, and vice versa.
James being not horrible and James being not itchy imply that John is additional.
Someone is not horrible if and only if he is remarkable.
If there is at least one people who is not horrible or itchy, then John is famous.
As long as someone is not confident, he is not famous and itchy.
It can be concluded that John is not confident once knowing that Ian is horrible.
If someone is not confident or he is not additional, then he is famous.
Albern is horrible if and only if Ian is not itchy and James is additional.
Sean being itchy implies that Sean is not remarkable.
It can be concluded that Herbert is not itchy and James is not remarkable once knowing that Herbert is additional. | John is remarkable. | neutral |
Ian is famous.
James is famous.
James is horrible.
Herbert is additional.
Blanche is itchy.
Albern is itchy.
John is confident.
Ian is remarkable.
John is not famous.
Sean is famous.
Herbert is remarkable.
Sean is confident.If Ian is not horrible and Blanche is additional, then James is not itchy.
It can be concluded that Ian is horrible once knowing that James is famous.
If someone is famous, then he is additional, and vice versa.
James being not horrible and James being not itchy imply that John is additional.
Someone is not horrible if and only if he is remarkable.
If there is at least one people who is not horrible or itchy, then John is famous.
As long as someone is not confident, he is not famous and itchy.
It can be concluded that John is not confident once knowing that Ian is horrible.
If someone is not confident or he is not additional, then he is famous.
Albern is horrible if and only if Ian is not itchy and James is additional.
Sean being itchy implies that Sean is not remarkable.
It can be concluded that Herbert is not itchy and James is not remarkable once knowing that Herbert is additional. | John is not famous. | self_contradiction |
Ian is famous.
James is famous.
James is horrible.
Herbert is additional.
Blanche is itchy.
Albern is itchy.
John is confident.
Ian is remarkable.
John is not famous.
Sean is famous.
Herbert is remarkable.
Sean is confident.If Ian is not horrible and Blanche is additional, then James is not itchy.
It can be concluded that Ian is horrible once knowing that James is famous.
If someone is famous, then he is additional, and vice versa.
James being not horrible and James being not itchy imply that John is additional.
Someone is not horrible if and only if he is remarkable.
If there is at least one people who is not horrible or itchy, then John is famous.
As long as someone is not confident, he is not famous and itchy.
It can be concluded that John is not confident once knowing that Ian is horrible.
If someone is not confident or he is not additional, then he is famous.
Albern is horrible if and only if Ian is not itchy and James is additional.
Sean being itchy implies that Sean is not remarkable.
It can be concluded that Herbert is not itchy and James is not remarkable once knowing that Herbert is additional. | Sean is not confident. | contradiction |
Ian is famous.
James is famous.
James is horrible.
Herbert is additional.
Blanche is itchy.
Albern is itchy.
John is confident.
Ian is remarkable.
John is not famous.
Sean is famous.
Herbert is remarkable.
Sean is confident.If Ian is not horrible and Blanche is additional, then James is not itchy.
It can be concluded that Ian is horrible once knowing that James is famous.
If someone is famous, then he is additional, and vice versa.
James being not horrible and James being not itchy imply that John is additional.
Someone is not horrible if and only if he is remarkable.
If there is at least one people who is not horrible or itchy, then John is famous.
As long as someone is not confident, he is not famous and itchy.
It can be concluded that John is not confident once knowing that Ian is horrible.
If someone is not confident or he is not additional, then he is famous.
Albern is horrible if and only if Ian is not itchy and James is additional.
Sean being itchy implies that Sean is not remarkable.
It can be concluded that Herbert is not itchy and James is not remarkable once knowing that Herbert is additional. | Herbert is not additional. | contradiction |
Ian is famous.
James is famous.
James is horrible.
Herbert is additional.
Blanche is itchy.
Albern is itchy.
John is confident.
Ian is remarkable.
John is not famous.
Sean is famous.
Herbert is remarkable.
Sean is confident.If Ian is not horrible and Blanche is additional, then James is not itchy.
It can be concluded that Ian is horrible once knowing that James is famous.
If someone is famous, then he is additional, and vice versa.
James being not horrible and James being not itchy imply that John is additional.
Someone is not horrible if and only if he is remarkable.
If there is at least one people who is not horrible or itchy, then John is famous.
As long as someone is not confident, he is not famous and itchy.
It can be concluded that John is not confident once knowing that Ian is horrible.
If someone is not confident or he is not additional, then he is famous.
Albern is horrible if and only if Ian is not itchy and James is additional.
Sean being itchy implies that Sean is not remarkable.
It can be concluded that Herbert is not itchy and James is not remarkable once knowing that Herbert is additional. | Sean is confident. | entailment |
Ian is famous.
James is famous.
James is horrible.
Herbert is additional.
Blanche is itchy.
Albern is itchy.
John is confident.
Ian is remarkable.
John is not famous.
Sean is famous.
Herbert is remarkable.
Sean is confident.If Ian is not horrible and Blanche is additional, then James is not itchy.
It can be concluded that Ian is horrible once knowing that James is famous.
If someone is famous, then he is additional, and vice versa.
James being not horrible and James being not itchy imply that John is additional.
Someone is not horrible if and only if he is remarkable.
If there is at least one people who is not horrible or itchy, then John is famous.
As long as someone is not confident, he is not famous and itchy.
It can be concluded that John is not confident once knowing that Ian is horrible.
If someone is not confident or he is not additional, then he is famous.
Albern is horrible if and only if Ian is not itchy and James is additional.
Sean being itchy implies that Sean is not remarkable.
It can be concluded that Herbert is not itchy and James is not remarkable once knowing that Herbert is additional. | Ian is not additional. | contradiction |
Ian is famous.
James is famous.
James is horrible.
Herbert is additional.
Blanche is itchy.
Albern is itchy.
John is confident.
Ian is remarkable.
John is not famous.
Sean is famous.
Herbert is remarkable.
Sean is confident.If Ian is not horrible and Blanche is additional, then James is not itchy.
It can be concluded that Ian is horrible once knowing that James is famous.
If someone is famous, then he is additional, and vice versa.
James being not horrible and James being not itchy imply that John is additional.
Someone is not horrible if and only if he is remarkable.
If there is at least one people who is not horrible or itchy, then John is famous.
As long as someone is not confident, he is not famous and itchy.
It can be concluded that John is not confident once knowing that Ian is horrible.
If someone is not confident or he is not additional, then he is famous.
Albern is horrible if and only if Ian is not itchy and James is additional.
Sean being itchy implies that Sean is not remarkable.
It can be concluded that Herbert is not itchy and James is not remarkable once knowing that Herbert is additional. | James is not itchy. | neutral |
Ian is famous.
James is famous.
James is horrible.
Herbert is additional.
Blanche is itchy.
Albern is itchy.
John is confident.
Ian is remarkable.
John is not famous.
Sean is famous.
Herbert is remarkable.
Sean is confident.If Ian is not horrible and Blanche is additional, then James is not itchy.
It can be concluded that Ian is horrible once knowing that James is famous.
If someone is famous, then he is additional, and vice versa.
James being not horrible and James being not itchy imply that John is additional.
Someone is not horrible if and only if he is remarkable.
If there is at least one people who is not horrible or itchy, then John is famous.
As long as someone is not confident, he is not famous and itchy.
It can be concluded that John is not confident once knowing that Ian is horrible.
If someone is not confident or he is not additional, then he is famous.
Albern is horrible if and only if Ian is not itchy and James is additional.
Sean being itchy implies that Sean is not remarkable.
It can be concluded that Herbert is not itchy and James is not remarkable once knowing that Herbert is additional. | James is not confident. | neutral |
Ian is famous.
James is famous.
James is horrible.
Herbert is additional.
Blanche is itchy.
Albern is itchy.
John is confident.
Ian is remarkable.
John is not famous.
Sean is famous.
Herbert is remarkable.
Sean is confident.If Ian is not horrible and Blanche is additional, then James is not itchy.
It can be concluded that Ian is horrible once knowing that James is famous.
If someone is famous, then he is additional, and vice versa.
James being not horrible and James being not itchy imply that John is additional.
Someone is not horrible if and only if he is remarkable.
If there is at least one people who is not horrible or itchy, then John is famous.
As long as someone is not confident, he is not famous and itchy.
It can be concluded that John is not confident once knowing that Ian is horrible.
If someone is not confident or he is not additional, then he is famous.
Albern is horrible if and only if Ian is not itchy and James is additional.
Sean being itchy implies that Sean is not remarkable.
It can be concluded that Herbert is not itchy and James is not remarkable once knowing that Herbert is additional. | Ian is not famous. | contradiction |
Ian is famous.
James is famous.
James is horrible.
Herbert is additional.
Blanche is itchy.
Albern is itchy.
John is confident.
Ian is remarkable.
John is not famous.
Sean is famous.
Herbert is remarkable.
Sean is confident.If Ian is not horrible and Blanche is additional, then James is not itchy.
It can be concluded that Ian is horrible once knowing that James is famous.
If someone is famous, then he is additional, and vice versa.
James being not horrible and James being not itchy imply that John is additional.
Someone is not horrible if and only if he is remarkable.
If there is at least one people who is not horrible or itchy, then John is famous.
As long as someone is not confident, he is not famous and itchy.
It can be concluded that John is not confident once knowing that Ian is horrible.
If someone is not confident or he is not additional, then he is famous.
Albern is horrible if and only if Ian is not itchy and James is additional.
Sean being itchy implies that Sean is not remarkable.
It can be concluded that Herbert is not itchy and James is not remarkable once knowing that Herbert is additional. | Sean is famous. | entailment |
Ian is famous.
James is famous.
James is horrible.
Herbert is additional.
Blanche is itchy.
Albern is itchy.
John is confident.
Ian is remarkable.
John is not famous.
Sean is famous.
Herbert is remarkable.
Sean is confident.If Ian is not horrible and Blanche is additional, then James is not itchy.
It can be concluded that Ian is horrible once knowing that James is famous.
If someone is famous, then he is additional, and vice versa.
James being not horrible and James being not itchy imply that John is additional.
Someone is not horrible if and only if he is remarkable.
If there is at least one people who is not horrible or itchy, then John is famous.
As long as someone is not confident, he is not famous and itchy.
It can be concluded that John is not confident once knowing that Ian is horrible.
If someone is not confident or he is not additional, then he is famous.
Albern is horrible if and only if Ian is not itchy and James is additional.
Sean being itchy implies that Sean is not remarkable.
It can be concluded that Herbert is not itchy and James is not remarkable once knowing that Herbert is additional. | Herbert is itchy. | contradiction |
Ian is famous.
James is famous.
James is horrible.
Herbert is additional.
Blanche is itchy.
Albern is itchy.
John is confident.
Ian is remarkable.
John is not famous.
Sean is famous.
Herbert is remarkable.
Sean is confident.If Ian is not horrible and Blanche is additional, then James is not itchy.
It can be concluded that Ian is horrible once knowing that James is famous.
If someone is famous, then he is additional, and vice versa.
James being not horrible and James being not itchy imply that John is additional.
Someone is not horrible if and only if he is remarkable.
If there is at least one people who is not horrible or itchy, then John is famous.
As long as someone is not confident, he is not famous and itchy.
It can be concluded that John is not confident once knowing that Ian is horrible.
If someone is not confident or he is not additional, then he is famous.
Albern is horrible if and only if Ian is not itchy and James is additional.
Sean being itchy implies that Sean is not remarkable.
It can be concluded that Herbert is not itchy and James is not remarkable once knowing that Herbert is additional. | Ian is horrible. | self_contradiction |
Ian is famous.
James is famous.
James is horrible.
Herbert is additional.
Blanche is itchy.
Albern is itchy.
John is confident.
Ian is remarkable.
John is not famous.
Sean is famous.
Herbert is remarkable.
Sean is confident.If Ian is not horrible and Blanche is additional, then James is not itchy.
It can be concluded that Ian is horrible once knowing that James is famous.
If someone is famous, then he is additional, and vice versa.
James being not horrible and James being not itchy imply that John is additional.
Someone is not horrible if and only if he is remarkable.
If there is at least one people who is not horrible or itchy, then John is famous.
As long as someone is not confident, he is not famous and itchy.
It can be concluded that John is not confident once knowing that Ian is horrible.
If someone is not confident or he is not additional, then he is famous.
Albern is horrible if and only if Ian is not itchy and James is additional.
Sean being itchy implies that Sean is not remarkable.
It can be concluded that Herbert is not itchy and James is not remarkable once knowing that Herbert is additional. | James is famous. | entailment |
Ian is famous.
James is famous.
James is horrible.
Herbert is additional.
Blanche is itchy.
Albern is itchy.
John is confident.
Ian is remarkable.
John is not famous.
Sean is famous.
Herbert is remarkable.
Sean is confident.If Ian is not horrible and Blanche is additional, then James is not itchy.
It can be concluded that Ian is horrible once knowing that James is famous.
If someone is famous, then he is additional, and vice versa.
James being not horrible and James being not itchy imply that John is additional.
Someone is not horrible if and only if he is remarkable.
If there is at least one people who is not horrible or itchy, then John is famous.
As long as someone is not confident, he is not famous and itchy.
It can be concluded that John is not confident once knowing that Ian is horrible.
If someone is not confident or he is not additional, then he is famous.
Albern is horrible if and only if Ian is not itchy and James is additional.
Sean being itchy implies that Sean is not remarkable.
It can be concluded that Herbert is not itchy and James is not remarkable once knowing that Herbert is additional. | Sean is additional. | entailment |
Ian is famous.
James is famous.
James is horrible.
Herbert is additional.
Blanche is itchy.
Albern is itchy.
John is confident.
Ian is remarkable.
John is not famous.
Sean is famous.
Herbert is remarkable.
Sean is confident.If Ian is not horrible and Blanche is additional, then James is not itchy.
It can be concluded that Ian is horrible once knowing that James is famous.
If someone is famous, then he is additional, and vice versa.
James being not horrible and James being not itchy imply that John is additional.
Someone is not horrible if and only if he is remarkable.
If there is at least one people who is not horrible or itchy, then John is famous.
As long as someone is not confident, he is not famous and itchy.
It can be concluded that John is not confident once knowing that Ian is horrible.
If someone is not confident or he is not additional, then he is famous.
Albern is horrible if and only if Ian is not itchy and James is additional.
Sean being itchy implies that Sean is not remarkable.
It can be concluded that Herbert is not itchy and James is not remarkable once knowing that Herbert is additional. | Albern is not famous. | neutral |
Ian is famous.
James is famous.
James is horrible.
Herbert is additional.
Blanche is itchy.
Albern is itchy.
John is confident.
Ian is remarkable.
John is not famous.
Sean is famous.
Herbert is remarkable.
Sean is confident.If Ian is not horrible and Blanche is additional, then James is not itchy.
It can be concluded that Ian is horrible once knowing that James is famous.
If someone is famous, then he is additional, and vice versa.
James being not horrible and James being not itchy imply that John is additional.
Someone is not horrible if and only if he is remarkable.
If there is at least one people who is not horrible or itchy, then John is famous.
As long as someone is not confident, he is not famous and itchy.
It can be concluded that John is not confident once knowing that Ian is horrible.
If someone is not confident or he is not additional, then he is famous.
Albern is horrible if and only if Ian is not itchy and James is additional.
Sean being itchy implies that Sean is not remarkable.
It can be concluded that Herbert is not itchy and James is not remarkable once knowing that Herbert is additional. | Blanche is remarkable. | neutral |
Ian is famous.
James is famous.
James is horrible.
Herbert is additional.
Blanche is itchy.
Albern is itchy.
John is confident.
Ian is remarkable.
John is not famous.
Sean is famous.
Herbert is remarkable.
Sean is confident.If Ian is not horrible and Blanche is additional, then James is not itchy.
It can be concluded that Ian is horrible once knowing that James is famous.
If someone is famous, then he is additional, and vice versa.
James being not horrible and James being not itchy imply that John is additional.
Someone is not horrible if and only if he is remarkable.
If there is at least one people who is not horrible or itchy, then John is famous.
As long as someone is not confident, he is not famous and itchy.
It can be concluded that John is not confident once knowing that Ian is horrible.
If someone is not confident or he is not additional, then he is famous.
Albern is horrible if and only if Ian is not itchy and James is additional.
Sean being itchy implies that Sean is not remarkable.
It can be concluded that Herbert is not itchy and James is not remarkable once knowing that Herbert is additional. | Ian is not horrible. | self_contradiction |
Ian is famous.
James is famous.
James is horrible.
Herbert is additional.
Blanche is itchy.
Albern is itchy.
John is confident.
Ian is remarkable.
John is not famous.
Sean is famous.
Herbert is remarkable.
Sean is confident.If Ian is not horrible and Blanche is additional, then James is not itchy.
It can be concluded that Ian is horrible once knowing that James is famous.
If someone is famous, then he is additional, and vice versa.
James being not horrible and James being not itchy imply that John is additional.
Someone is not horrible if and only if he is remarkable.
If there is at least one people who is not horrible or itchy, then John is famous.
As long as someone is not confident, he is not famous and itchy.
It can be concluded that John is not confident once knowing that Ian is horrible.
If someone is not confident or he is not additional, then he is famous.
Albern is horrible if and only if Ian is not itchy and James is additional.
Sean being itchy implies that Sean is not remarkable.
It can be concluded that Herbert is not itchy and James is not remarkable once knowing that Herbert is additional. | Herbert is not horrible. | entailment |
Ian is famous.
James is famous.
James is horrible.
Herbert is additional.
Blanche is itchy.
Albern is itchy.
John is confident.
Ian is remarkable.
John is not famous.
Sean is famous.
Herbert is remarkable.
Sean is confident.If Ian is not horrible and Blanche is additional, then James is not itchy.
It can be concluded that Ian is horrible once knowing that James is famous.
If someone is famous, then he is additional, and vice versa.
James being not horrible and James being not itchy imply that John is additional.
Someone is not horrible if and only if he is remarkable.
If there is at least one people who is not horrible or itchy, then John is famous.
As long as someone is not confident, he is not famous and itchy.
It can be concluded that John is not confident once knowing that Ian is horrible.
If someone is not confident or he is not additional, then he is famous.
Albern is horrible if and only if Ian is not itchy and James is additional.
Sean being itchy implies that Sean is not remarkable.
It can be concluded that Herbert is not itchy and James is not remarkable once knowing that Herbert is additional. | John is not confident. | self_contradiction |
Crispin is agreeable.
Chrysta is not excited.
Keegan is not disgusted.
Crispin is not unsightly.
Bruce is not unsightly.
Gloria is united.
Bruce is disgusted.
Crispin is not excited.
Keegan is not troubled.
Sherard is disgusted.
Kingston is not disgusted.
Sherard is not united.If there is someone who is both unsightly and disgusted, then Keegan is agreeable.
Someone who is not united is always both not excited and disgusted.
If everyone is not agreeable or unsightly, then Bruce is not united.
If Sherard is unsightly, then Chrysta is excited and Bruce is agreeable.
If there is at least one people who is not disgusted or united, then Kingston is troubled.
As long as someone is disgusted, he is excited and unsightly.
If Bruce is disgusted, then Sherard is excited and Gloria is united, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either not troubled or not agreeable, then Chrysta is not excited and Chrysta is disgusted.
Sherard is troubled if and only if Keegan is unsightly and Keegan is not excited.
If someone is united and not troubled, then he is not disgusted, and vice versa.
If Crispin is not excited and Gloria is not disgusted, then Bruce is troubled and Crispin is agreeable, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not excited, then Sherard is troubled. | Bruce is not unsightly. | self_contradiction |
Crispin is agreeable.
Chrysta is not excited.
Keegan is not disgusted.
Crispin is not unsightly.
Bruce is not unsightly.
Gloria is united.
Bruce is disgusted.
Crispin is not excited.
Keegan is not troubled.
Sherard is disgusted.
Kingston is not disgusted.
Sherard is not united.If there is someone who is both unsightly and disgusted, then Keegan is agreeable.
Someone who is not united is always both not excited and disgusted.
If everyone is not agreeable or unsightly, then Bruce is not united.
If Sherard is unsightly, then Chrysta is excited and Bruce is agreeable.
If there is at least one people who is not disgusted or united, then Kingston is troubled.
As long as someone is disgusted, he is excited and unsightly.
If Bruce is disgusted, then Sherard is excited and Gloria is united, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either not troubled or not agreeable, then Chrysta is not excited and Chrysta is disgusted.
Sherard is troubled if and only if Keegan is unsightly and Keegan is not excited.
If someone is united and not troubled, then he is not disgusted, and vice versa.
If Crispin is not excited and Gloria is not disgusted, then Bruce is troubled and Crispin is agreeable, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not excited, then Sherard is troubled. | Chrysta is not excited. | self_contradiction |
Crispin is agreeable.
Chrysta is not excited.
Keegan is not disgusted.
Crispin is not unsightly.
Bruce is not unsightly.
Gloria is united.
Bruce is disgusted.
Crispin is not excited.
Keegan is not troubled.
Sherard is disgusted.
Kingston is not disgusted.
Sherard is not united.If there is someone who is both unsightly and disgusted, then Keegan is agreeable.
Someone who is not united is always both not excited and disgusted.
If everyone is not agreeable or unsightly, then Bruce is not united.
If Sherard is unsightly, then Chrysta is excited and Bruce is agreeable.
If there is at least one people who is not disgusted or united, then Kingston is troubled.
As long as someone is disgusted, he is excited and unsightly.
If Bruce is disgusted, then Sherard is excited and Gloria is united, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either not troubled or not agreeable, then Chrysta is not excited and Chrysta is disgusted.
Sherard is troubled if and only if Keegan is unsightly and Keegan is not excited.
If someone is united and not troubled, then he is not disgusted, and vice versa.
If Crispin is not excited and Gloria is not disgusted, then Bruce is troubled and Crispin is agreeable, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not excited, then Sherard is troubled. | Chrysta is not disgusted. | contradiction |
Crispin is agreeable.
Chrysta is not excited.
Keegan is not disgusted.
Crispin is not unsightly.
Bruce is not unsightly.
Gloria is united.
Bruce is disgusted.
Crispin is not excited.
Keegan is not troubled.
Sherard is disgusted.
Kingston is not disgusted.
Sherard is not united.If there is someone who is both unsightly and disgusted, then Keegan is agreeable.
Someone who is not united is always both not excited and disgusted.
If everyone is not agreeable or unsightly, then Bruce is not united.
If Sherard is unsightly, then Chrysta is excited and Bruce is agreeable.
If there is at least one people who is not disgusted or united, then Kingston is troubled.
As long as someone is disgusted, he is excited and unsightly.
If Bruce is disgusted, then Sherard is excited and Gloria is united, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either not troubled or not agreeable, then Chrysta is not excited and Chrysta is disgusted.
Sherard is troubled if and only if Keegan is unsightly and Keegan is not excited.
If someone is united and not troubled, then he is not disgusted, and vice versa.
If Crispin is not excited and Gloria is not disgusted, then Bruce is troubled and Crispin is agreeable, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not excited, then Sherard is troubled. | Crispin is excited. | contradiction |
Crispin is agreeable.
Chrysta is not excited.
Keegan is not disgusted.
Crispin is not unsightly.
Bruce is not unsightly.
Gloria is united.
Bruce is disgusted.
Crispin is not excited.
Keegan is not troubled.
Sherard is disgusted.
Kingston is not disgusted.
Sherard is not united.If there is someone who is both unsightly and disgusted, then Keegan is agreeable.
Someone who is not united is always both not excited and disgusted.
If everyone is not agreeable or unsightly, then Bruce is not united.
If Sherard is unsightly, then Chrysta is excited and Bruce is agreeable.
If there is at least one people who is not disgusted or united, then Kingston is troubled.
As long as someone is disgusted, he is excited and unsightly.
If Bruce is disgusted, then Sherard is excited and Gloria is united, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either not troubled or not agreeable, then Chrysta is not excited and Chrysta is disgusted.
Sherard is troubled if and only if Keegan is unsightly and Keegan is not excited.
If someone is united and not troubled, then he is not disgusted, and vice versa.
If Crispin is not excited and Gloria is not disgusted, then Bruce is troubled and Crispin is agreeable, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not excited, then Sherard is troubled. | Gloria is disgusted. | neutral |
Crispin is agreeable.
Chrysta is not excited.
Keegan is not disgusted.
Crispin is not unsightly.
Bruce is not unsightly.
Gloria is united.
Bruce is disgusted.
Crispin is not excited.
Keegan is not troubled.
Sherard is disgusted.
Kingston is not disgusted.
Sherard is not united.If there is someone who is both unsightly and disgusted, then Keegan is agreeable.
Someone who is not united is always both not excited and disgusted.
If everyone is not agreeable or unsightly, then Bruce is not united.
If Sherard is unsightly, then Chrysta is excited and Bruce is agreeable.
If there is at least one people who is not disgusted or united, then Kingston is troubled.
As long as someone is disgusted, he is excited and unsightly.
If Bruce is disgusted, then Sherard is excited and Gloria is united, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either not troubled or not agreeable, then Chrysta is not excited and Chrysta is disgusted.
Sherard is troubled if and only if Keegan is unsightly and Keegan is not excited.
If someone is united and not troubled, then he is not disgusted, and vice versa.
If Crispin is not excited and Gloria is not disgusted, then Bruce is troubled and Crispin is agreeable, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not excited, then Sherard is troubled. | Crispin is not excited. | entailment |
Crispin is agreeable.
Chrysta is not excited.
Keegan is not disgusted.
Crispin is not unsightly.
Bruce is not unsightly.
Gloria is united.
Bruce is disgusted.
Crispin is not excited.
Keegan is not troubled.
Sherard is disgusted.
Kingston is not disgusted.
Sherard is not united.If there is someone who is both unsightly and disgusted, then Keegan is agreeable.
Someone who is not united is always both not excited and disgusted.
If everyone is not agreeable or unsightly, then Bruce is not united.
If Sherard is unsightly, then Chrysta is excited and Bruce is agreeable.
If there is at least one people who is not disgusted or united, then Kingston is troubled.
As long as someone is disgusted, he is excited and unsightly.
If Bruce is disgusted, then Sherard is excited and Gloria is united, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either not troubled or not agreeable, then Chrysta is not excited and Chrysta is disgusted.
Sherard is troubled if and only if Keegan is unsightly and Keegan is not excited.
If someone is united and not troubled, then he is not disgusted, and vice versa.
If Crispin is not excited and Gloria is not disgusted, then Bruce is troubled and Crispin is agreeable, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not excited, then Sherard is troubled. | Bruce is unsightly. | self_contradiction |
Crispin is agreeable.
Chrysta is not excited.
Keegan is not disgusted.
Crispin is not unsightly.
Bruce is not unsightly.
Gloria is united.
Bruce is disgusted.
Crispin is not excited.
Keegan is not troubled.
Sherard is disgusted.
Kingston is not disgusted.
Sherard is not united.If there is someone who is both unsightly and disgusted, then Keegan is agreeable.
Someone who is not united is always both not excited and disgusted.
If everyone is not agreeable or unsightly, then Bruce is not united.
If Sherard is unsightly, then Chrysta is excited and Bruce is agreeable.
If there is at least one people who is not disgusted or united, then Kingston is troubled.
As long as someone is disgusted, he is excited and unsightly.
If Bruce is disgusted, then Sherard is excited and Gloria is united, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either not troubled or not agreeable, then Chrysta is not excited and Chrysta is disgusted.
Sherard is troubled if and only if Keegan is unsightly and Keegan is not excited.
If someone is united and not troubled, then he is not disgusted, and vice versa.
If Crispin is not excited and Gloria is not disgusted, then Bruce is troubled and Crispin is agreeable, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not excited, then Sherard is troubled. | Kingston is excited. | neutral |
Crispin is agreeable.
Chrysta is not excited.
Keegan is not disgusted.
Crispin is not unsightly.
Bruce is not unsightly.
Gloria is united.
Bruce is disgusted.
Crispin is not excited.
Keegan is not troubled.
Sherard is disgusted.
Kingston is not disgusted.
Sherard is not united.If there is someone who is both unsightly and disgusted, then Keegan is agreeable.
Someone who is not united is always both not excited and disgusted.
If everyone is not agreeable or unsightly, then Bruce is not united.
If Sherard is unsightly, then Chrysta is excited and Bruce is agreeable.
If there is at least one people who is not disgusted or united, then Kingston is troubled.
As long as someone is disgusted, he is excited and unsightly.
If Bruce is disgusted, then Sherard is excited and Gloria is united, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either not troubled or not agreeable, then Chrysta is not excited and Chrysta is disgusted.
Sherard is troubled if and only if Keegan is unsightly and Keegan is not excited.
If someone is united and not troubled, then he is not disgusted, and vice versa.
If Crispin is not excited and Gloria is not disgusted, then Bruce is troubled and Crispin is agreeable, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not excited, then Sherard is troubled. | Sherard is not excited. | self_contradiction |
Crispin is agreeable.
Chrysta is not excited.
Keegan is not disgusted.
Crispin is not unsightly.
Bruce is not unsightly.
Gloria is united.
Bruce is disgusted.
Crispin is not excited.
Keegan is not troubled.
Sherard is disgusted.
Kingston is not disgusted.
Sherard is not united.If there is someone who is both unsightly and disgusted, then Keegan is agreeable.
Someone who is not united is always both not excited and disgusted.
If everyone is not agreeable or unsightly, then Bruce is not united.
If Sherard is unsightly, then Chrysta is excited and Bruce is agreeable.
If there is at least one people who is not disgusted or united, then Kingston is troubled.
As long as someone is disgusted, he is excited and unsightly.
If Bruce is disgusted, then Sherard is excited and Gloria is united, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either not troubled or not agreeable, then Chrysta is not excited and Chrysta is disgusted.
Sherard is troubled if and only if Keegan is unsightly and Keegan is not excited.
If someone is united and not troubled, then he is not disgusted, and vice versa.
If Crispin is not excited and Gloria is not disgusted, then Bruce is troubled and Crispin is agreeable, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not excited, then Sherard is troubled. | Chrysta is united. | neutral |
Crispin is agreeable.
Chrysta is not excited.
Keegan is not disgusted.
Crispin is not unsightly.
Bruce is not unsightly.
Gloria is united.
Bruce is disgusted.
Crispin is not excited.
Keegan is not troubled.
Sherard is disgusted.
Kingston is not disgusted.
Sherard is not united.If there is someone who is both unsightly and disgusted, then Keegan is agreeable.
Someone who is not united is always both not excited and disgusted.
If everyone is not agreeable or unsightly, then Bruce is not united.
If Sherard is unsightly, then Chrysta is excited and Bruce is agreeable.
If there is at least one people who is not disgusted or united, then Kingston is troubled.
As long as someone is disgusted, he is excited and unsightly.
If Bruce is disgusted, then Sherard is excited and Gloria is united, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either not troubled or not agreeable, then Chrysta is not excited and Chrysta is disgusted.
Sherard is troubled if and only if Keegan is unsightly and Keegan is not excited.
If someone is united and not troubled, then he is not disgusted, and vice versa.
If Crispin is not excited and Gloria is not disgusted, then Bruce is troubled and Crispin is agreeable, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not excited, then Sherard is troubled. | Chrysta is agreeable. | neutral |
Crispin is agreeable.
Chrysta is not excited.
Keegan is not disgusted.
Crispin is not unsightly.
Bruce is not unsightly.
Gloria is united.
Bruce is disgusted.
Crispin is not excited.
Keegan is not troubled.
Sherard is disgusted.
Kingston is not disgusted.
Sherard is not united.If there is someone who is both unsightly and disgusted, then Keegan is agreeable.
Someone who is not united is always both not excited and disgusted.
If everyone is not agreeable or unsightly, then Bruce is not united.
If Sherard is unsightly, then Chrysta is excited and Bruce is agreeable.
If there is at least one people who is not disgusted or united, then Kingston is troubled.
As long as someone is disgusted, he is excited and unsightly.
If Bruce is disgusted, then Sherard is excited and Gloria is united, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either not troubled or not agreeable, then Chrysta is not excited and Chrysta is disgusted.
Sherard is troubled if and only if Keegan is unsightly and Keegan is not excited.
If someone is united and not troubled, then he is not disgusted, and vice versa.
If Crispin is not excited and Gloria is not disgusted, then Bruce is troubled and Crispin is agreeable, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not excited, then Sherard is troubled. | Keegan is united. | entailment |
Crispin is agreeable.
Chrysta is not excited.
Keegan is not disgusted.
Crispin is not unsightly.
Bruce is not unsightly.
Gloria is united.
Bruce is disgusted.
Crispin is not excited.
Keegan is not troubled.
Sherard is disgusted.
Kingston is not disgusted.
Sherard is not united.If there is someone who is both unsightly and disgusted, then Keegan is agreeable.
Someone who is not united is always both not excited and disgusted.
If everyone is not agreeable or unsightly, then Bruce is not united.
If Sherard is unsightly, then Chrysta is excited and Bruce is agreeable.
If there is at least one people who is not disgusted or united, then Kingston is troubled.
As long as someone is disgusted, he is excited and unsightly.
If Bruce is disgusted, then Sherard is excited and Gloria is united, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either not troubled or not agreeable, then Chrysta is not excited and Chrysta is disgusted.
Sherard is troubled if and only if Keegan is unsightly and Keegan is not excited.
If someone is united and not troubled, then he is not disgusted, and vice versa.
If Crispin is not excited and Gloria is not disgusted, then Bruce is troubled and Crispin is agreeable, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not excited, then Sherard is troubled. | Bruce is agreeable. | entailment |
Crispin is agreeable.
Chrysta is not excited.
Keegan is not disgusted.
Crispin is not unsightly.
Bruce is not unsightly.
Gloria is united.
Bruce is disgusted.
Crispin is not excited.
Keegan is not troubled.
Sherard is disgusted.
Kingston is not disgusted.
Sherard is not united.If there is someone who is both unsightly and disgusted, then Keegan is agreeable.
Someone who is not united is always both not excited and disgusted.
If everyone is not agreeable or unsightly, then Bruce is not united.
If Sherard is unsightly, then Chrysta is excited and Bruce is agreeable.
If there is at least one people who is not disgusted or united, then Kingston is troubled.
As long as someone is disgusted, he is excited and unsightly.
If Bruce is disgusted, then Sherard is excited and Gloria is united, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either not troubled or not agreeable, then Chrysta is not excited and Chrysta is disgusted.
Sherard is troubled if and only if Keegan is unsightly and Keegan is not excited.
If someone is united and not troubled, then he is not disgusted, and vice versa.
If Crispin is not excited and Gloria is not disgusted, then Bruce is troubled and Crispin is agreeable, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not excited, then Sherard is troubled. | Bruce is disgusted. | entailment |
Crispin is agreeable.
Chrysta is not excited.
Keegan is not disgusted.
Crispin is not unsightly.
Bruce is not unsightly.
Gloria is united.
Bruce is disgusted.
Crispin is not excited.
Keegan is not troubled.
Sherard is disgusted.
Kingston is not disgusted.
Sherard is not united.If there is someone who is both unsightly and disgusted, then Keegan is agreeable.
Someone who is not united is always both not excited and disgusted.
If everyone is not agreeable or unsightly, then Bruce is not united.
If Sherard is unsightly, then Chrysta is excited and Bruce is agreeable.
If there is at least one people who is not disgusted or united, then Kingston is troubled.
As long as someone is disgusted, he is excited and unsightly.
If Bruce is disgusted, then Sherard is excited and Gloria is united, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either not troubled or not agreeable, then Chrysta is not excited and Chrysta is disgusted.
Sherard is troubled if and only if Keegan is unsightly and Keegan is not excited.
If someone is united and not troubled, then he is not disgusted, and vice versa.
If Crispin is not excited and Gloria is not disgusted, then Bruce is troubled and Crispin is agreeable, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not excited, then Sherard is troubled. | Bruce is united. | neutral |
Crispin is agreeable.
Chrysta is not excited.
Keegan is not disgusted.
Crispin is not unsightly.
Bruce is not unsightly.
Gloria is united.
Bruce is disgusted.
Crispin is not excited.
Keegan is not troubled.
Sherard is disgusted.
Kingston is not disgusted.
Sherard is not united.If there is someone who is both unsightly and disgusted, then Keegan is agreeable.
Someone who is not united is always both not excited and disgusted.
If everyone is not agreeable or unsightly, then Bruce is not united.
If Sherard is unsightly, then Chrysta is excited and Bruce is agreeable.
If there is at least one people who is not disgusted or united, then Kingston is troubled.
As long as someone is disgusted, he is excited and unsightly.
If Bruce is disgusted, then Sherard is excited and Gloria is united, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either not troubled or not agreeable, then Chrysta is not excited and Chrysta is disgusted.
Sherard is troubled if and only if Keegan is unsightly and Keegan is not excited.
If someone is united and not troubled, then he is not disgusted, and vice versa.
If Crispin is not excited and Gloria is not disgusted, then Bruce is troubled and Crispin is agreeable, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not excited, then Sherard is troubled. | Kingston is troubled. | self_contradiction |
Crispin is agreeable.
Chrysta is not excited.
Keegan is not disgusted.
Crispin is not unsightly.
Bruce is not unsightly.
Gloria is united.
Bruce is disgusted.
Crispin is not excited.
Keegan is not troubled.
Sherard is disgusted.
Kingston is not disgusted.
Sherard is not united.If there is someone who is both unsightly and disgusted, then Keegan is agreeable.
Someone who is not united is always both not excited and disgusted.
If everyone is not agreeable or unsightly, then Bruce is not united.
If Sherard is unsightly, then Chrysta is excited and Bruce is agreeable.
If there is at least one people who is not disgusted or united, then Kingston is troubled.
As long as someone is disgusted, he is excited and unsightly.
If Bruce is disgusted, then Sherard is excited and Gloria is united, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either not troubled or not agreeable, then Chrysta is not excited and Chrysta is disgusted.
Sherard is troubled if and only if Keegan is unsightly and Keegan is not excited.
If someone is united and not troubled, then he is not disgusted, and vice versa.
If Crispin is not excited and Gloria is not disgusted, then Bruce is troubled and Crispin is agreeable, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not excited, then Sherard is troubled. | Keegan is not troubled. | entailment |
Crispin is agreeable.
Chrysta is not excited.
Keegan is not disgusted.
Crispin is not unsightly.
Bruce is not unsightly.
Gloria is united.
Bruce is disgusted.
Crispin is not excited.
Keegan is not troubled.
Sherard is disgusted.
Kingston is not disgusted.
Sherard is not united.If there is someone who is both unsightly and disgusted, then Keegan is agreeable.
Someone who is not united is always both not excited and disgusted.
If everyone is not agreeable or unsightly, then Bruce is not united.
If Sherard is unsightly, then Chrysta is excited and Bruce is agreeable.
If there is at least one people who is not disgusted or united, then Kingston is troubled.
As long as someone is disgusted, he is excited and unsightly.
If Bruce is disgusted, then Sherard is excited and Gloria is united, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either not troubled or not agreeable, then Chrysta is not excited and Chrysta is disgusted.
Sherard is troubled if and only if Keegan is unsightly and Keegan is not excited.
If someone is united and not troubled, then he is not disgusted, and vice versa.
If Crispin is not excited and Gloria is not disgusted, then Bruce is troubled and Crispin is agreeable, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not excited, then Sherard is troubled. | Bruce is not excited. | contradiction |
Crispin is agreeable.
Chrysta is not excited.
Keegan is not disgusted.
Crispin is not unsightly.
Bruce is not unsightly.
Gloria is united.
Bruce is disgusted.
Crispin is not excited.
Keegan is not troubled.
Sherard is disgusted.
Kingston is not disgusted.
Sherard is not united.If there is someone who is both unsightly and disgusted, then Keegan is agreeable.
Someone who is not united is always both not excited and disgusted.
If everyone is not agreeable or unsightly, then Bruce is not united.
If Sherard is unsightly, then Chrysta is excited and Bruce is agreeable.
If there is at least one people who is not disgusted or united, then Kingston is troubled.
As long as someone is disgusted, he is excited and unsightly.
If Bruce is disgusted, then Sherard is excited and Gloria is united, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either not troubled or not agreeable, then Chrysta is not excited and Chrysta is disgusted.
Sherard is troubled if and only if Keegan is unsightly and Keegan is not excited.
If someone is united and not troubled, then he is not disgusted, and vice versa.
If Crispin is not excited and Gloria is not disgusted, then Bruce is troubled and Crispin is agreeable, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not excited, then Sherard is troubled. | Sherard is not troubled. | contradiction |
Crispin is agreeable.
Chrysta is not excited.
Keegan is not disgusted.
Crispin is not unsightly.
Bruce is not unsightly.
Gloria is united.
Bruce is disgusted.
Crispin is not excited.
Keegan is not troubled.
Sherard is disgusted.
Kingston is not disgusted.
Sherard is not united.If there is someone who is both unsightly and disgusted, then Keegan is agreeable.
Someone who is not united is always both not excited and disgusted.
If everyone is not agreeable or unsightly, then Bruce is not united.
If Sherard is unsightly, then Chrysta is excited and Bruce is agreeable.
If there is at least one people who is not disgusted or united, then Kingston is troubled.
As long as someone is disgusted, he is excited and unsightly.
If Bruce is disgusted, then Sherard is excited and Gloria is united, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either not troubled or not agreeable, then Chrysta is not excited and Chrysta is disgusted.
Sherard is troubled if and only if Keegan is unsightly and Keegan is not excited.
If someone is united and not troubled, then he is not disgusted, and vice versa.
If Crispin is not excited and Gloria is not disgusted, then Bruce is troubled and Crispin is agreeable, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not excited, then Sherard is troubled. | Keegan is not unsightly. | contradiction |
Alice is grumpy.
Jimmy is not zealous.
Aldis is silly.
Carlton is not adventurous.
Jimmy is grumpy.
Reginald is not silly.
Aldis is right.
Aldis is zealous.
Alice is zealous.
Braden is zealous.
Reginald is not logical.
Jimmy is right.Someone is grumpy and not silly if and only if he is not logical and not right.
If there is someone who is either not zealous or not adventurous, then Aldis is not logical.
If Carlton is not right and Aldis is zealous, then Carlton is silly and Reginald is logical.
Someone is not logical and not adventurous if and only if he is not grumpy.
It can be concluded that Braden is not adventurous once knowing that Alice is not right.
If someone is not grumpy or he is not zealous, then he is logical.
If Reginald is not logical, then Braden is grumpy and Alice is silly, and vice versa.
Someone who is zealous is always adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is either not zealous or right, then Braden is not grumpy and Alice is not logical.
It can be concluded that Alice is not adventurous once knowing that Aldis is not silly and Braden is logical.
If there is at least one people who is adventurous or right, then Alice is not zealous.
Reginald being zealous is equivalent to Reginald being not right. | Carlton is not grumpy. | neutral |
Alice is grumpy.
Jimmy is not zealous.
Aldis is silly.
Carlton is not adventurous.
Jimmy is grumpy.
Reginald is not silly.
Aldis is right.
Aldis is zealous.
Alice is zealous.
Braden is zealous.
Reginald is not logical.
Jimmy is right.Someone is grumpy and not silly if and only if he is not logical and not right.
If there is someone who is either not zealous or not adventurous, then Aldis is not logical.
If Carlton is not right and Aldis is zealous, then Carlton is silly and Reginald is logical.
Someone is not logical and not adventurous if and only if he is not grumpy.
It can be concluded that Braden is not adventurous once knowing that Alice is not right.
If someone is not grumpy or he is not zealous, then he is logical.
If Reginald is not logical, then Braden is grumpy and Alice is silly, and vice versa.
Someone who is zealous is always adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is either not zealous or right, then Braden is not grumpy and Alice is not logical.
It can be concluded that Alice is not adventurous once knowing that Aldis is not silly and Braden is logical.
If there is at least one people who is adventurous or right, then Alice is not zealous.
Reginald being zealous is equivalent to Reginald being not right. | Reginald is adventurous. | neutral |
Alice is grumpy.
Jimmy is not zealous.
Aldis is silly.
Carlton is not adventurous.
Jimmy is grumpy.
Reginald is not silly.
Aldis is right.
Aldis is zealous.
Alice is zealous.
Braden is zealous.
Reginald is not logical.
Jimmy is right.Someone is grumpy and not silly if and only if he is not logical and not right.
If there is someone who is either not zealous or not adventurous, then Aldis is not logical.
If Carlton is not right and Aldis is zealous, then Carlton is silly and Reginald is logical.
Someone is not logical and not adventurous if and only if he is not grumpy.
It can be concluded that Braden is not adventurous once knowing that Alice is not right.
If someone is not grumpy or he is not zealous, then he is logical.
If Reginald is not logical, then Braden is grumpy and Alice is silly, and vice versa.
Someone who is zealous is always adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is either not zealous or right, then Braden is not grumpy and Alice is not logical.
It can be concluded that Alice is not adventurous once knowing that Aldis is not silly and Braden is logical.
If there is at least one people who is adventurous or right, then Alice is not zealous.
Reginald being zealous is equivalent to Reginald being not right. | Reginald is not logical. | entailment |
Alice is grumpy.
Jimmy is not zealous.
Aldis is silly.
Carlton is not adventurous.
Jimmy is grumpy.
Reginald is not silly.
Aldis is right.
Aldis is zealous.
Alice is zealous.
Braden is zealous.
Reginald is not logical.
Jimmy is right.Someone is grumpy and not silly if and only if he is not logical and not right.
If there is someone who is either not zealous or not adventurous, then Aldis is not logical.
If Carlton is not right and Aldis is zealous, then Carlton is silly and Reginald is logical.
Someone is not logical and not adventurous if and only if he is not grumpy.
It can be concluded that Braden is not adventurous once knowing that Alice is not right.
If someone is not grumpy or he is not zealous, then he is logical.
If Reginald is not logical, then Braden is grumpy and Alice is silly, and vice versa.
Someone who is zealous is always adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is either not zealous or right, then Braden is not grumpy and Alice is not logical.
It can be concluded that Alice is not adventurous once knowing that Aldis is not silly and Braden is logical.
If there is at least one people who is adventurous or right, then Alice is not zealous.
Reginald being zealous is equivalent to Reginald being not right. | Braden is not zealous. | contradiction |
Alice is grumpy.
Jimmy is not zealous.
Aldis is silly.
Carlton is not adventurous.
Jimmy is grumpy.
Reginald is not silly.
Aldis is right.
Aldis is zealous.
Alice is zealous.
Braden is zealous.
Reginald is not logical.
Jimmy is right.Someone is grumpy and not silly if and only if he is not logical and not right.
If there is someone who is either not zealous or not adventurous, then Aldis is not logical.
If Carlton is not right and Aldis is zealous, then Carlton is silly and Reginald is logical.
Someone is not logical and not adventurous if and only if he is not grumpy.
It can be concluded that Braden is not adventurous once knowing that Alice is not right.
If someone is not grumpy or he is not zealous, then he is logical.
If Reginald is not logical, then Braden is grumpy and Alice is silly, and vice versa.
Someone who is zealous is always adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is either not zealous or right, then Braden is not grumpy and Alice is not logical.
It can be concluded that Alice is not adventurous once knowing that Aldis is not silly and Braden is logical.
If there is at least one people who is adventurous or right, then Alice is not zealous.
Reginald being zealous is equivalent to Reginald being not right. | Braden is logical. | self_contradiction |
Alice is grumpy.
Jimmy is not zealous.
Aldis is silly.
Carlton is not adventurous.
Jimmy is grumpy.
Reginald is not silly.
Aldis is right.
Aldis is zealous.
Alice is zealous.
Braden is zealous.
Reginald is not logical.
Jimmy is right.Someone is grumpy and not silly if and only if he is not logical and not right.
If there is someone who is either not zealous or not adventurous, then Aldis is not logical.
If Carlton is not right and Aldis is zealous, then Carlton is silly and Reginald is logical.
Someone is not logical and not adventurous if and only if he is not grumpy.
It can be concluded that Braden is not adventurous once knowing that Alice is not right.
If someone is not grumpy or he is not zealous, then he is logical.
If Reginald is not logical, then Braden is grumpy and Alice is silly, and vice versa.
Someone who is zealous is always adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is either not zealous or right, then Braden is not grumpy and Alice is not logical.
It can be concluded that Alice is not adventurous once knowing that Aldis is not silly and Braden is logical.
If there is at least one people who is adventurous or right, then Alice is not zealous.
Reginald being zealous is equivalent to Reginald being not right. | Reginald is silly. | contradiction |
Alice is grumpy.
Jimmy is not zealous.
Aldis is silly.
Carlton is not adventurous.
Jimmy is grumpy.
Reginald is not silly.
Aldis is right.
Aldis is zealous.
Alice is zealous.
Braden is zealous.
Reginald is not logical.
Jimmy is right.Someone is grumpy and not silly if and only if he is not logical and not right.
If there is someone who is either not zealous or not adventurous, then Aldis is not logical.
If Carlton is not right and Aldis is zealous, then Carlton is silly and Reginald is logical.
Someone is not logical and not adventurous if and only if he is not grumpy.
It can be concluded that Braden is not adventurous once knowing that Alice is not right.
If someone is not grumpy or he is not zealous, then he is logical.
If Reginald is not logical, then Braden is grumpy and Alice is silly, and vice versa.
Someone who is zealous is always adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is either not zealous or right, then Braden is not grumpy and Alice is not logical.
It can be concluded that Alice is not adventurous once knowing that Aldis is not silly and Braden is logical.
If there is at least one people who is adventurous or right, then Alice is not zealous.
Reginald being zealous is equivalent to Reginald being not right. | Aldis is adventurous. | entailment |
Alice is grumpy.
Jimmy is not zealous.
Aldis is silly.
Carlton is not adventurous.
Jimmy is grumpy.
Reginald is not silly.
Aldis is right.
Aldis is zealous.
Alice is zealous.
Braden is zealous.
Reginald is not logical.
Jimmy is right.Someone is grumpy and not silly if and only if he is not logical and not right.
If there is someone who is either not zealous or not adventurous, then Aldis is not logical.
If Carlton is not right and Aldis is zealous, then Carlton is silly and Reginald is logical.
Someone is not logical and not adventurous if and only if he is not grumpy.
It can be concluded that Braden is not adventurous once knowing that Alice is not right.
If someone is not grumpy or he is not zealous, then he is logical.
If Reginald is not logical, then Braden is grumpy and Alice is silly, and vice versa.
Someone who is zealous is always adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is either not zealous or right, then Braden is not grumpy and Alice is not logical.
It can be concluded that Alice is not adventurous once knowing that Aldis is not silly and Braden is logical.
If there is at least one people who is adventurous or right, then Alice is not zealous.
Reginald being zealous is equivalent to Reginald being not right. | Jimmy is grumpy. | entailment |
Alice is grumpy.
Jimmy is not zealous.
Aldis is silly.
Carlton is not adventurous.
Jimmy is grumpy.
Reginald is not silly.
Aldis is right.
Aldis is zealous.
Alice is zealous.
Braden is zealous.
Reginald is not logical.
Jimmy is right.Someone is grumpy and not silly if and only if he is not logical and not right.
If there is someone who is either not zealous or not adventurous, then Aldis is not logical.
If Carlton is not right and Aldis is zealous, then Carlton is silly and Reginald is logical.
Someone is not logical and not adventurous if and only if he is not grumpy.
It can be concluded that Braden is not adventurous once knowing that Alice is not right.
If someone is not grumpy or he is not zealous, then he is logical.
If Reginald is not logical, then Braden is grumpy and Alice is silly, and vice versa.
Someone who is zealous is always adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is either not zealous or right, then Braden is not grumpy and Alice is not logical.
It can be concluded that Alice is not adventurous once knowing that Aldis is not silly and Braden is logical.
If there is at least one people who is adventurous or right, then Alice is not zealous.
Reginald being zealous is equivalent to Reginald being not right. | Conroy is not grumpy. | neutral |
Alice is grumpy.
Jimmy is not zealous.
Aldis is silly.
Carlton is not adventurous.
Jimmy is grumpy.
Reginald is not silly.
Aldis is right.
Aldis is zealous.
Alice is zealous.
Braden is zealous.
Reginald is not logical.
Jimmy is right.Someone is grumpy and not silly if and only if he is not logical and not right.
If there is someone who is either not zealous or not adventurous, then Aldis is not logical.
If Carlton is not right and Aldis is zealous, then Carlton is silly and Reginald is logical.
Someone is not logical and not adventurous if and only if he is not grumpy.
It can be concluded that Braden is not adventurous once knowing that Alice is not right.
If someone is not grumpy or he is not zealous, then he is logical.
If Reginald is not logical, then Braden is grumpy and Alice is silly, and vice versa.
Someone who is zealous is always adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is either not zealous or right, then Braden is not grumpy and Alice is not logical.
It can be concluded that Alice is not adventurous once knowing that Aldis is not silly and Braden is logical.
If there is at least one people who is adventurous or right, then Alice is not zealous.
Reginald being zealous is equivalent to Reginald being not right. | Alice is zealous. | self_contradiction |
Alice is grumpy.
Jimmy is not zealous.
Aldis is silly.
Carlton is not adventurous.
Jimmy is grumpy.
Reginald is not silly.
Aldis is right.
Aldis is zealous.
Alice is zealous.
Braden is zealous.
Reginald is not logical.
Jimmy is right.Someone is grumpy and not silly if and only if he is not logical and not right.
If there is someone who is either not zealous or not adventurous, then Aldis is not logical.
If Carlton is not right and Aldis is zealous, then Carlton is silly and Reginald is logical.
Someone is not logical and not adventurous if and only if he is not grumpy.
It can be concluded that Braden is not adventurous once knowing that Alice is not right.
If someone is not grumpy or he is not zealous, then he is logical.
If Reginald is not logical, then Braden is grumpy and Alice is silly, and vice versa.
Someone who is zealous is always adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is either not zealous or right, then Braden is not grumpy and Alice is not logical.
It can be concluded that Alice is not adventurous once knowing that Aldis is not silly and Braden is logical.
If there is at least one people who is adventurous or right, then Alice is not zealous.
Reginald being zealous is equivalent to Reginald being not right. | Alice is adventurous. | entailment |
Alice is grumpy.
Jimmy is not zealous.
Aldis is silly.
Carlton is not adventurous.
Jimmy is grumpy.
Reginald is not silly.
Aldis is right.
Aldis is zealous.
Alice is zealous.
Braden is zealous.
Reginald is not logical.
Jimmy is right.Someone is grumpy and not silly if and only if he is not logical and not right.
If there is someone who is either not zealous or not adventurous, then Aldis is not logical.
If Carlton is not right and Aldis is zealous, then Carlton is silly and Reginald is logical.
Someone is not logical and not adventurous if and only if he is not grumpy.
It can be concluded that Braden is not adventurous once knowing that Alice is not right.
If someone is not grumpy or he is not zealous, then he is logical.
If Reginald is not logical, then Braden is grumpy and Alice is silly, and vice versa.
Someone who is zealous is always adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is either not zealous or right, then Braden is not grumpy and Alice is not logical.
It can be concluded that Alice is not adventurous once knowing that Aldis is not silly and Braden is logical.
If there is at least one people who is adventurous or right, then Alice is not zealous.
Reginald being zealous is equivalent to Reginald being not right. | Alice is not grumpy. | contradiction |
Alice is grumpy.
Jimmy is not zealous.
Aldis is silly.
Carlton is not adventurous.
Jimmy is grumpy.
Reginald is not silly.
Aldis is right.
Aldis is zealous.
Alice is zealous.
Braden is zealous.
Reginald is not logical.
Jimmy is right.Someone is grumpy and not silly if and only if he is not logical and not right.
If there is someone who is either not zealous or not adventurous, then Aldis is not logical.
If Carlton is not right and Aldis is zealous, then Carlton is silly and Reginald is logical.
Someone is not logical and not adventurous if and only if he is not grumpy.
It can be concluded that Braden is not adventurous once knowing that Alice is not right.
If someone is not grumpy or he is not zealous, then he is logical.
If Reginald is not logical, then Braden is grumpy and Alice is silly, and vice versa.
Someone who is zealous is always adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is either not zealous or right, then Braden is not grumpy and Alice is not logical.
It can be concluded that Alice is not adventurous once knowing that Aldis is not silly and Braden is logical.
If there is at least one people who is adventurous or right, then Alice is not zealous.
Reginald being zealous is equivalent to Reginald being not right. | Alice is not logical. | self_contradiction |
Alice is grumpy.
Jimmy is not zealous.
Aldis is silly.
Carlton is not adventurous.
Jimmy is grumpy.
Reginald is not silly.
Aldis is right.
Aldis is zealous.
Alice is zealous.
Braden is zealous.
Reginald is not logical.
Jimmy is right.Someone is grumpy and not silly if and only if he is not logical and not right.
If there is someone who is either not zealous or not adventurous, then Aldis is not logical.
If Carlton is not right and Aldis is zealous, then Carlton is silly and Reginald is logical.
Someone is not logical and not adventurous if and only if he is not grumpy.
It can be concluded that Braden is not adventurous once knowing that Alice is not right.
If someone is not grumpy or he is not zealous, then he is logical.
If Reginald is not logical, then Braden is grumpy and Alice is silly, and vice versa.
Someone who is zealous is always adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is either not zealous or right, then Braden is not grumpy and Alice is not logical.
It can be concluded that Alice is not adventurous once knowing that Aldis is not silly and Braden is logical.
If there is at least one people who is adventurous or right, then Alice is not zealous.
Reginald being zealous is equivalent to Reginald being not right. | Carlton is zealous. | neutral |
Alice is grumpy.
Jimmy is not zealous.
Aldis is silly.
Carlton is not adventurous.
Jimmy is grumpy.
Reginald is not silly.
Aldis is right.
Aldis is zealous.
Alice is zealous.
Braden is zealous.
Reginald is not logical.
Jimmy is right.Someone is grumpy and not silly if and only if he is not logical and not right.
If there is someone who is either not zealous or not adventurous, then Aldis is not logical.
If Carlton is not right and Aldis is zealous, then Carlton is silly and Reginald is logical.
Someone is not logical and not adventurous if and only if he is not grumpy.
It can be concluded that Braden is not adventurous once knowing that Alice is not right.
If someone is not grumpy or he is not zealous, then he is logical.
If Reginald is not logical, then Braden is grumpy and Alice is silly, and vice versa.
Someone who is zealous is always adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is either not zealous or right, then Braden is not grumpy and Alice is not logical.
It can be concluded that Alice is not adventurous once knowing that Aldis is not silly and Braden is logical.
If there is at least one people who is adventurous or right, then Alice is not zealous.
Reginald being zealous is equivalent to Reginald being not right. | Jimmy is not grumpy. | contradiction |
Alice is grumpy.
Jimmy is not zealous.
Aldis is silly.
Carlton is not adventurous.
Jimmy is grumpy.
Reginald is not silly.
Aldis is right.
Aldis is zealous.
Alice is zealous.
Braden is zealous.
Reginald is not logical.
Jimmy is right.Someone is grumpy and not silly if and only if he is not logical and not right.
If there is someone who is either not zealous or not adventurous, then Aldis is not logical.
If Carlton is not right and Aldis is zealous, then Carlton is silly and Reginald is logical.
Someone is not logical and not adventurous if and only if he is not grumpy.
It can be concluded that Braden is not adventurous once knowing that Alice is not right.
If someone is not grumpy or he is not zealous, then he is logical.
If Reginald is not logical, then Braden is grumpy and Alice is silly, and vice versa.
Someone who is zealous is always adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is either not zealous or right, then Braden is not grumpy and Alice is not logical.
It can be concluded that Alice is not adventurous once knowing that Aldis is not silly and Braden is logical.
If there is at least one people who is adventurous or right, then Alice is not zealous.
Reginald being zealous is equivalent to Reginald being not right. | Aldis is silly. | entailment |
Alice is grumpy.
Jimmy is not zealous.
Aldis is silly.
Carlton is not adventurous.
Jimmy is grumpy.
Reginald is not silly.
Aldis is right.
Aldis is zealous.
Alice is zealous.
Braden is zealous.
Reginald is not logical.
Jimmy is right.Someone is grumpy and not silly if and only if he is not logical and not right.
If there is someone who is either not zealous or not adventurous, then Aldis is not logical.
If Carlton is not right and Aldis is zealous, then Carlton is silly and Reginald is logical.
Someone is not logical and not adventurous if and only if he is not grumpy.
It can be concluded that Braden is not adventurous once knowing that Alice is not right.
If someone is not grumpy or he is not zealous, then he is logical.
If Reginald is not logical, then Braden is grumpy and Alice is silly, and vice versa.
Someone who is zealous is always adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is either not zealous or right, then Braden is not grumpy and Alice is not logical.
It can be concluded that Alice is not adventurous once knowing that Aldis is not silly and Braden is logical.
If there is at least one people who is adventurous or right, then Alice is not zealous.
Reginald being zealous is equivalent to Reginald being not right. | Alice is not zealous. | self_contradiction |
Alice is grumpy.
Jimmy is not zealous.
Aldis is silly.
Carlton is not adventurous.
Jimmy is grumpy.
Reginald is not silly.
Aldis is right.
Aldis is zealous.
Alice is zealous.
Braden is zealous.
Reginald is not logical.
Jimmy is right.Someone is grumpy and not silly if and only if he is not logical and not right.
If there is someone who is either not zealous or not adventurous, then Aldis is not logical.
If Carlton is not right and Aldis is zealous, then Carlton is silly and Reginald is logical.
Someone is not logical and not adventurous if and only if he is not grumpy.
It can be concluded that Braden is not adventurous once knowing that Alice is not right.
If someone is not grumpy or he is not zealous, then he is logical.
If Reginald is not logical, then Braden is grumpy and Alice is silly, and vice versa.
Someone who is zealous is always adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is either not zealous or right, then Braden is not grumpy and Alice is not logical.
It can be concluded that Alice is not adventurous once knowing that Aldis is not silly and Braden is logical.
If there is at least one people who is adventurous or right, then Alice is not zealous.
Reginald being zealous is equivalent to Reginald being not right. | Aldis is not zealous. | contradiction |
Alice is grumpy.
Jimmy is not zealous.
Aldis is silly.
Carlton is not adventurous.
Jimmy is grumpy.
Reginald is not silly.
Aldis is right.
Aldis is zealous.
Alice is zealous.
Braden is zealous.
Reginald is not logical.
Jimmy is right.Someone is grumpy and not silly if and only if he is not logical and not right.
If there is someone who is either not zealous or not adventurous, then Aldis is not logical.
If Carlton is not right and Aldis is zealous, then Carlton is silly and Reginald is logical.
Someone is not logical and not adventurous if and only if he is not grumpy.
It can be concluded that Braden is not adventurous once knowing that Alice is not right.
If someone is not grumpy or he is not zealous, then he is logical.
If Reginald is not logical, then Braden is grumpy and Alice is silly, and vice versa.
Someone who is zealous is always adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is either not zealous or right, then Braden is not grumpy and Alice is not logical.
It can be concluded that Alice is not adventurous once knowing that Aldis is not silly and Braden is logical.
If there is at least one people who is adventurous or right, then Alice is not zealous.
Reginald being zealous is equivalent to Reginald being not right. | Braden is adventurous. | self_contradiction |
Alice is grumpy.
Jimmy is not zealous.
Aldis is silly.
Carlton is not adventurous.
Jimmy is grumpy.
Reginald is not silly.
Aldis is right.
Aldis is zealous.
Alice is zealous.
Braden is zealous.
Reginald is not logical.
Jimmy is right.Someone is grumpy and not silly if and only if he is not logical and not right.
If there is someone who is either not zealous or not adventurous, then Aldis is not logical.
If Carlton is not right and Aldis is zealous, then Carlton is silly and Reginald is logical.
Someone is not logical and not adventurous if and only if he is not grumpy.
It can be concluded that Braden is not adventurous once knowing that Alice is not right.
If someone is not grumpy or he is not zealous, then he is logical.
If Reginald is not logical, then Braden is grumpy and Alice is silly, and vice versa.
Someone who is zealous is always adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is either not zealous or right, then Braden is not grumpy and Alice is not logical.
It can be concluded that Alice is not adventurous once knowing that Aldis is not silly and Braden is logical.
If there is at least one people who is adventurous or right, then Alice is not zealous.
Reginald being zealous is equivalent to Reginald being not right. | Jimmy is not silly. | neutral |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.