premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Kathie is puzzled.
Stewart is helpful.
Graham is puzzled.
Stanley is sleepy.
Kathie is not helpful.
Garrick is not handsome.
Kathie is not handsome.
Garrick is not sleepy.
Garth is ugly.
Kathie is not sleepy.
Garth is not puzzled.
Garrick is not ugly.It can be concluded that Graham is not puzzled once knowing that Kendall is not careful or Kathie is sleepy.
Someone who is not careful or not helpful is always ugly and not sleepy.
Someone who is helpful is always both sleepy and not handsome.
If someone is puzzled and not helpful, then he is not careful, and vice versa.
If Garrick is not handsome, then Garrick is careful and Stewart is puzzled.
Someone who is not helpful is always handsome.
Someone is puzzled if and only if he is helpful.
As long as someone is sleepy, he is careful and not puzzled.
If there is at least one people who is not careful, then Garth is sleepy and Stanley is ugly.
It can be concluded that Stanley is ugly and Kendall is not careful once knowing that Stanley is helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not helpful, then Stanley is not sleepy and Garrick is not puzzled.
It can be concluded that Garth is not helpful and Garrick is sleepy once knowing that Stanley is puzzled. | Garrick is careful. | entailment |
Kathie is puzzled.
Stewart is helpful.
Graham is puzzled.
Stanley is sleepy.
Kathie is not helpful.
Garrick is not handsome.
Kathie is not handsome.
Garrick is not sleepy.
Garth is ugly.
Kathie is not sleepy.
Garth is not puzzled.
Garrick is not ugly.It can be concluded that Graham is not puzzled once knowing that Kendall is not careful or Kathie is sleepy.
Someone who is not careful or not helpful is always ugly and not sleepy.
Someone who is helpful is always both sleepy and not handsome.
If someone is puzzled and not helpful, then he is not careful, and vice versa.
If Garrick is not handsome, then Garrick is careful and Stewart is puzzled.
Someone who is not helpful is always handsome.
Someone is puzzled if and only if he is helpful.
As long as someone is sleepy, he is careful and not puzzled.
If there is at least one people who is not careful, then Garth is sleepy and Stanley is ugly.
It can be concluded that Stanley is ugly and Kendall is not careful once knowing that Stanley is helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not helpful, then Stanley is not sleepy and Garrick is not puzzled.
It can be concluded that Garth is not helpful and Garrick is sleepy once knowing that Stanley is puzzled. | Kathie is sleepy. | self_contradiction |
Kathie is puzzled.
Stewart is helpful.
Graham is puzzled.
Stanley is sleepy.
Kathie is not helpful.
Garrick is not handsome.
Kathie is not handsome.
Garrick is not sleepy.
Garth is ugly.
Kathie is not sleepy.
Garth is not puzzled.
Garrick is not ugly.It can be concluded that Graham is not puzzled once knowing that Kendall is not careful or Kathie is sleepy.
Someone who is not careful or not helpful is always ugly and not sleepy.
Someone who is helpful is always both sleepy and not handsome.
If someone is puzzled and not helpful, then he is not careful, and vice versa.
If Garrick is not handsome, then Garrick is careful and Stewart is puzzled.
Someone who is not helpful is always handsome.
Someone is puzzled if and only if he is helpful.
As long as someone is sleepy, he is careful and not puzzled.
If there is at least one people who is not careful, then Garth is sleepy and Stanley is ugly.
It can be concluded that Stanley is ugly and Kendall is not careful once knowing that Stanley is helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not helpful, then Stanley is not sleepy and Garrick is not puzzled.
It can be concluded that Garth is not helpful and Garrick is sleepy once knowing that Stanley is puzzled. | Graham is not puzzled. | self_contradiction |
Kathie is puzzled.
Stewart is helpful.
Graham is puzzled.
Stanley is sleepy.
Kathie is not helpful.
Garrick is not handsome.
Kathie is not handsome.
Garrick is not sleepy.
Garth is ugly.
Kathie is not sleepy.
Garth is not puzzled.
Garrick is not ugly.It can be concluded that Graham is not puzzled once knowing that Kendall is not careful or Kathie is sleepy.
Someone who is not careful or not helpful is always ugly and not sleepy.
Someone who is helpful is always both sleepy and not handsome.
If someone is puzzled and not helpful, then he is not careful, and vice versa.
If Garrick is not handsome, then Garrick is careful and Stewart is puzzled.
Someone who is not helpful is always handsome.
Someone is puzzled if and only if he is helpful.
As long as someone is sleepy, he is careful and not puzzled.
If there is at least one people who is not careful, then Garth is sleepy and Stanley is ugly.
It can be concluded that Stanley is ugly and Kendall is not careful once knowing that Stanley is helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not helpful, then Stanley is not sleepy and Garrick is not puzzled.
It can be concluded that Garth is not helpful and Garrick is sleepy once knowing that Stanley is puzzled. | Graham is not careful. | contradiction |
Kathie is puzzled.
Stewart is helpful.
Graham is puzzled.
Stanley is sleepy.
Kathie is not helpful.
Garrick is not handsome.
Kathie is not handsome.
Garrick is not sleepy.
Garth is ugly.
Kathie is not sleepy.
Garth is not puzzled.
Garrick is not ugly.It can be concluded that Graham is not puzzled once knowing that Kendall is not careful or Kathie is sleepy.
Someone who is not careful or not helpful is always ugly and not sleepy.
Someone who is helpful is always both sleepy and not handsome.
If someone is puzzled and not helpful, then he is not careful, and vice versa.
If Garrick is not handsome, then Garrick is careful and Stewart is puzzled.
Someone who is not helpful is always handsome.
Someone is puzzled if and only if he is helpful.
As long as someone is sleepy, he is careful and not puzzled.
If there is at least one people who is not careful, then Garth is sleepy and Stanley is ugly.
It can be concluded that Stanley is ugly and Kendall is not careful once knowing that Stanley is helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not helpful, then Stanley is not sleepy and Garrick is not puzzled.
It can be concluded that Garth is not helpful and Garrick is sleepy once knowing that Stanley is puzzled. | Garth is careful. | entailment |
Kathie is puzzled.
Stewart is helpful.
Graham is puzzled.
Stanley is sleepy.
Kathie is not helpful.
Garrick is not handsome.
Kathie is not handsome.
Garrick is not sleepy.
Garth is ugly.
Kathie is not sleepy.
Garth is not puzzled.
Garrick is not ugly.It can be concluded that Graham is not puzzled once knowing that Kendall is not careful or Kathie is sleepy.
Someone who is not careful or not helpful is always ugly and not sleepy.
Someone who is helpful is always both sleepy and not handsome.
If someone is puzzled and not helpful, then he is not careful, and vice versa.
If Garrick is not handsome, then Garrick is careful and Stewart is puzzled.
Someone who is not helpful is always handsome.
Someone is puzzled if and only if he is helpful.
As long as someone is sleepy, he is careful and not puzzled.
If there is at least one people who is not careful, then Garth is sleepy and Stanley is ugly.
It can be concluded that Stanley is ugly and Kendall is not careful once knowing that Stanley is helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not helpful, then Stanley is not sleepy and Garrick is not puzzled.
It can be concluded that Garth is not helpful and Garrick is sleepy once knowing that Stanley is puzzled. | Stanley is handsome. | neutral |
Kathie is puzzled.
Stewart is helpful.
Graham is puzzled.
Stanley is sleepy.
Kathie is not helpful.
Garrick is not handsome.
Kathie is not handsome.
Garrick is not sleepy.
Garth is ugly.
Kathie is not sleepy.
Garth is not puzzled.
Garrick is not ugly.It can be concluded that Graham is not puzzled once knowing that Kendall is not careful or Kathie is sleepy.
Someone who is not careful or not helpful is always ugly and not sleepy.
Someone who is helpful is always both sleepy and not handsome.
If someone is puzzled and not helpful, then he is not careful, and vice versa.
If Garrick is not handsome, then Garrick is careful and Stewart is puzzled.
Someone who is not helpful is always handsome.
Someone is puzzled if and only if he is helpful.
As long as someone is sleepy, he is careful and not puzzled.
If there is at least one people who is not careful, then Garth is sleepy and Stanley is ugly.
It can be concluded that Stanley is ugly and Kendall is not careful once knowing that Stanley is helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not helpful, then Stanley is not sleepy and Garrick is not puzzled.
It can be concluded that Garth is not helpful and Garrick is sleepy once knowing that Stanley is puzzled. | Stewart is not handsome. | entailment |
Kathie is puzzled.
Stewart is helpful.
Graham is puzzled.
Stanley is sleepy.
Kathie is not helpful.
Garrick is not handsome.
Kathie is not handsome.
Garrick is not sleepy.
Garth is ugly.
Kathie is not sleepy.
Garth is not puzzled.
Garrick is not ugly.It can be concluded that Graham is not puzzled once knowing that Kendall is not careful or Kathie is sleepy.
Someone who is not careful or not helpful is always ugly and not sleepy.
Someone who is helpful is always both sleepy and not handsome.
If someone is puzzled and not helpful, then he is not careful, and vice versa.
If Garrick is not handsome, then Garrick is careful and Stewart is puzzled.
Someone who is not helpful is always handsome.
Someone is puzzled if and only if he is helpful.
As long as someone is sleepy, he is careful and not puzzled.
If there is at least one people who is not careful, then Garth is sleepy and Stanley is ugly.
It can be concluded that Stanley is ugly and Kendall is not careful once knowing that Stanley is helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not helpful, then Stanley is not sleepy and Garrick is not puzzled.
It can be concluded that Garth is not helpful and Garrick is sleepy once knowing that Stanley is puzzled. | Graham is not helpful. | contradiction |
Kathie is puzzled.
Stewart is helpful.
Graham is puzzled.
Stanley is sleepy.
Kathie is not helpful.
Garrick is not handsome.
Kathie is not handsome.
Garrick is not sleepy.
Garth is ugly.
Kathie is not sleepy.
Garth is not puzzled.
Garrick is not ugly.It can be concluded that Graham is not puzzled once knowing that Kendall is not careful or Kathie is sleepy.
Someone who is not careful or not helpful is always ugly and not sleepy.
Someone who is helpful is always both sleepy and not handsome.
If someone is puzzled and not helpful, then he is not careful, and vice versa.
If Garrick is not handsome, then Garrick is careful and Stewart is puzzled.
Someone who is not helpful is always handsome.
Someone is puzzled if and only if he is helpful.
As long as someone is sleepy, he is careful and not puzzled.
If there is at least one people who is not careful, then Garth is sleepy and Stanley is ugly.
It can be concluded that Stanley is ugly and Kendall is not careful once knowing that Stanley is helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not helpful, then Stanley is not sleepy and Garrick is not puzzled.
It can be concluded that Garth is not helpful and Garrick is sleepy once knowing that Stanley is puzzled. | Stanley is ugly. | entailment |
Kathie is puzzled.
Stewart is helpful.
Graham is puzzled.
Stanley is sleepy.
Kathie is not helpful.
Garrick is not handsome.
Kathie is not handsome.
Garrick is not sleepy.
Garth is ugly.
Kathie is not sleepy.
Garth is not puzzled.
Garrick is not ugly.It can be concluded that Graham is not puzzled once knowing that Kendall is not careful or Kathie is sleepy.
Someone who is not careful or not helpful is always ugly and not sleepy.
Someone who is helpful is always both sleepy and not handsome.
If someone is puzzled and not helpful, then he is not careful, and vice versa.
If Garrick is not handsome, then Garrick is careful and Stewart is puzzled.
Someone who is not helpful is always handsome.
Someone is puzzled if and only if he is helpful.
As long as someone is sleepy, he is careful and not puzzled.
If there is at least one people who is not careful, then Garth is sleepy and Stanley is ugly.
It can be concluded that Stanley is ugly and Kendall is not careful once knowing that Stanley is helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not helpful, then Stanley is not sleepy and Garrick is not puzzled.
It can be concluded that Garth is not helpful and Garrick is sleepy once knowing that Stanley is puzzled. | Kathie is handsome. | self_contradiction |
Kathie is puzzled.
Stewart is helpful.
Graham is puzzled.
Stanley is sleepy.
Kathie is not helpful.
Garrick is not handsome.
Kathie is not handsome.
Garrick is not sleepy.
Garth is ugly.
Kathie is not sleepy.
Garth is not puzzled.
Garrick is not ugly.It can be concluded that Graham is not puzzled once knowing that Kendall is not careful or Kathie is sleepy.
Someone who is not careful or not helpful is always ugly and not sleepy.
Someone who is helpful is always both sleepy and not handsome.
If someone is puzzled and not helpful, then he is not careful, and vice versa.
If Garrick is not handsome, then Garrick is careful and Stewart is puzzled.
Someone who is not helpful is always handsome.
Someone is puzzled if and only if he is helpful.
As long as someone is sleepy, he is careful and not puzzled.
If there is at least one people who is not careful, then Garth is sleepy and Stanley is ugly.
It can be concluded that Stanley is ugly and Kendall is not careful once knowing that Stanley is helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not helpful, then Stanley is not sleepy and Garrick is not puzzled.
It can be concluded that Garth is not helpful and Garrick is sleepy once knowing that Stanley is puzzled. | Graham is not ugly. | neutral |
Kathie is puzzled.
Stewart is helpful.
Graham is puzzled.
Stanley is sleepy.
Kathie is not helpful.
Garrick is not handsome.
Kathie is not handsome.
Garrick is not sleepy.
Garth is ugly.
Kathie is not sleepy.
Garth is not puzzled.
Garrick is not ugly.It can be concluded that Graham is not puzzled once knowing that Kendall is not careful or Kathie is sleepy.
Someone who is not careful or not helpful is always ugly and not sleepy.
Someone who is helpful is always both sleepy and not handsome.
If someone is puzzled and not helpful, then he is not careful, and vice versa.
If Garrick is not handsome, then Garrick is careful and Stewart is puzzled.
Someone who is not helpful is always handsome.
Someone is puzzled if and only if he is helpful.
As long as someone is sleepy, he is careful and not puzzled.
If there is at least one people who is not careful, then Garth is sleepy and Stanley is ugly.
It can be concluded that Stanley is ugly and Kendall is not careful once knowing that Stanley is helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not helpful, then Stanley is not sleepy and Garrick is not puzzled.
It can be concluded that Garth is not helpful and Garrick is sleepy once knowing that Stanley is puzzled. | Graham is handsome. | contradiction |
Kathie is puzzled.
Stewart is helpful.
Graham is puzzled.
Stanley is sleepy.
Kathie is not helpful.
Garrick is not handsome.
Kathie is not handsome.
Garrick is not sleepy.
Garth is ugly.
Kathie is not sleepy.
Garth is not puzzled.
Garrick is not ugly.It can be concluded that Graham is not puzzled once knowing that Kendall is not careful or Kathie is sleepy.
Someone who is not careful or not helpful is always ugly and not sleepy.
Someone who is helpful is always both sleepy and not handsome.
If someone is puzzled and not helpful, then he is not careful, and vice versa.
If Garrick is not handsome, then Garrick is careful and Stewart is puzzled.
Someone who is not helpful is always handsome.
Someone is puzzled if and only if he is helpful.
As long as someone is sleepy, he is careful and not puzzled.
If there is at least one people who is not careful, then Garth is sleepy and Stanley is ugly.
It can be concluded that Stanley is ugly and Kendall is not careful once knowing that Stanley is helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not helpful, then Stanley is not sleepy and Garrick is not puzzled.
It can be concluded that Garth is not helpful and Garrick is sleepy once knowing that Stanley is puzzled. | Stanley is not puzzled. | entailment |
Kathie is puzzled.
Stewart is helpful.
Graham is puzzled.
Stanley is sleepy.
Kathie is not helpful.
Garrick is not handsome.
Kathie is not handsome.
Garrick is not sleepy.
Garth is ugly.
Kathie is not sleepy.
Garth is not puzzled.
Garrick is not ugly.It can be concluded that Graham is not puzzled once knowing that Kendall is not careful or Kathie is sleepy.
Someone who is not careful or not helpful is always ugly and not sleepy.
Someone who is helpful is always both sleepy and not handsome.
If someone is puzzled and not helpful, then he is not careful, and vice versa.
If Garrick is not handsome, then Garrick is careful and Stewart is puzzled.
Someone who is not helpful is always handsome.
Someone is puzzled if and only if he is helpful.
As long as someone is sleepy, he is careful and not puzzled.
If there is at least one people who is not careful, then Garth is sleepy and Stanley is ugly.
It can be concluded that Stanley is ugly and Kendall is not careful once knowing that Stanley is helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not helpful, then Stanley is not sleepy and Garrick is not puzzled.
It can be concluded that Garth is not helpful and Garrick is sleepy once knowing that Stanley is puzzled. | Kathie is not careful. | self_contradiction |
Kathie is puzzled.
Stewart is helpful.
Graham is puzzled.
Stanley is sleepy.
Kathie is not helpful.
Garrick is not handsome.
Kathie is not handsome.
Garrick is not sleepy.
Garth is ugly.
Kathie is not sleepy.
Garth is not puzzled.
Garrick is not ugly.It can be concluded that Graham is not puzzled once knowing that Kendall is not careful or Kathie is sleepy.
Someone who is not careful or not helpful is always ugly and not sleepy.
Someone who is helpful is always both sleepy and not handsome.
If someone is puzzled and not helpful, then he is not careful, and vice versa.
If Garrick is not handsome, then Garrick is careful and Stewart is puzzled.
Someone who is not helpful is always handsome.
Someone is puzzled if and only if he is helpful.
As long as someone is sleepy, he is careful and not puzzled.
If there is at least one people who is not careful, then Garth is sleepy and Stanley is ugly.
It can be concluded that Stanley is ugly and Kendall is not careful once knowing that Stanley is helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not helpful, then Stanley is not sleepy and Garrick is not puzzled.
It can be concluded that Garth is not helpful and Garrick is sleepy once knowing that Stanley is puzzled. | Kathie is helpful. | self_contradiction |
Kathie is puzzled.
Stewart is helpful.
Graham is puzzled.
Stanley is sleepy.
Kathie is not helpful.
Garrick is not handsome.
Kathie is not handsome.
Garrick is not sleepy.
Garth is ugly.
Kathie is not sleepy.
Garth is not puzzled.
Garrick is not ugly.It can be concluded that Graham is not puzzled once knowing that Kendall is not careful or Kathie is sleepy.
Someone who is not careful or not helpful is always ugly and not sleepy.
Someone who is helpful is always both sleepy and not handsome.
If someone is puzzled and not helpful, then he is not careful, and vice versa.
If Garrick is not handsome, then Garrick is careful and Stewart is puzzled.
Someone who is not helpful is always handsome.
Someone is puzzled if and only if he is helpful.
As long as someone is sleepy, he is careful and not puzzled.
If there is at least one people who is not careful, then Garth is sleepy and Stanley is ugly.
It can be concluded that Stanley is ugly and Kendall is not careful once knowing that Stanley is helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not helpful, then Stanley is not sleepy and Garrick is not puzzled.
It can be concluded that Garth is not helpful and Garrick is sleepy once knowing that Stanley is puzzled. | Kendall is ugly. | neutral |
Kathie is puzzled.
Stewart is helpful.
Graham is puzzled.
Stanley is sleepy.
Kathie is not helpful.
Garrick is not handsome.
Kathie is not handsome.
Garrick is not sleepy.
Garth is ugly.
Kathie is not sleepy.
Garth is not puzzled.
Garrick is not ugly.It can be concluded that Graham is not puzzled once knowing that Kendall is not careful or Kathie is sleepy.
Someone who is not careful or not helpful is always ugly and not sleepy.
Someone who is helpful is always both sleepy and not handsome.
If someone is puzzled and not helpful, then he is not careful, and vice versa.
If Garrick is not handsome, then Garrick is careful and Stewart is puzzled.
Someone who is not helpful is always handsome.
Someone is puzzled if and only if he is helpful.
As long as someone is sleepy, he is careful and not puzzled.
If there is at least one people who is not careful, then Garth is sleepy and Stanley is ugly.
It can be concluded that Stanley is ugly and Kendall is not careful once knowing that Stanley is helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not helpful, then Stanley is not sleepy and Garrick is not puzzled.
It can be concluded that Garth is not helpful and Garrick is sleepy once knowing that Stanley is puzzled. | Kendall is handsome. | neutral |
Kathie is puzzled.
Stewart is helpful.
Graham is puzzled.
Stanley is sleepy.
Kathie is not helpful.
Garrick is not handsome.
Kathie is not handsome.
Garrick is not sleepy.
Garth is ugly.
Kathie is not sleepy.
Garth is not puzzled.
Garrick is not ugly.It can be concluded that Graham is not puzzled once knowing that Kendall is not careful or Kathie is sleepy.
Someone who is not careful or not helpful is always ugly and not sleepy.
Someone who is helpful is always both sleepy and not handsome.
If someone is puzzled and not helpful, then he is not careful, and vice versa.
If Garrick is not handsome, then Garrick is careful and Stewart is puzzled.
Someone who is not helpful is always handsome.
Someone is puzzled if and only if he is helpful.
As long as someone is sleepy, he is careful and not puzzled.
If there is at least one people who is not careful, then Garth is sleepy and Stanley is ugly.
It can be concluded that Stanley is ugly and Kendall is not careful once knowing that Stanley is helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not helpful, then Stanley is not sleepy and Garrick is not puzzled.
It can be concluded that Garth is not helpful and Garrick is sleepy once knowing that Stanley is puzzled. | Kendall is not puzzled. | neutral |
Kathie is puzzled.
Stewart is helpful.
Graham is puzzled.
Stanley is sleepy.
Kathie is not helpful.
Garrick is not handsome.
Kathie is not handsome.
Garrick is not sleepy.
Garth is ugly.
Kathie is not sleepy.
Garth is not puzzled.
Garrick is not ugly.It can be concluded that Graham is not puzzled once knowing that Kendall is not careful or Kathie is sleepy.
Someone who is not careful or not helpful is always ugly and not sleepy.
Someone who is helpful is always both sleepy and not handsome.
If someone is puzzled and not helpful, then he is not careful, and vice versa.
If Garrick is not handsome, then Garrick is careful and Stewart is puzzled.
Someone who is not helpful is always handsome.
Someone is puzzled if and only if he is helpful.
As long as someone is sleepy, he is careful and not puzzled.
If there is at least one people who is not careful, then Garth is sleepy and Stanley is ugly.
It can be concluded that Stanley is ugly and Kendall is not careful once knowing that Stanley is helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not helpful, then Stanley is not sleepy and Garrick is not puzzled.
It can be concluded that Garth is not helpful and Garrick is sleepy once knowing that Stanley is puzzled. | Kathie is not ugly. | contradiction |
Kathie is puzzled.
Stewart is helpful.
Graham is puzzled.
Stanley is sleepy.
Kathie is not helpful.
Garrick is not handsome.
Kathie is not handsome.
Garrick is not sleepy.
Garth is ugly.
Kathie is not sleepy.
Garth is not puzzled.
Garrick is not ugly.It can be concluded that Graham is not puzzled once knowing that Kendall is not careful or Kathie is sleepy.
Someone who is not careful or not helpful is always ugly and not sleepy.
Someone who is helpful is always both sleepy and not handsome.
If someone is puzzled and not helpful, then he is not careful, and vice versa.
If Garrick is not handsome, then Garrick is careful and Stewart is puzzled.
Someone who is not helpful is always handsome.
Someone is puzzled if and only if he is helpful.
As long as someone is sleepy, he is careful and not puzzled.
If there is at least one people who is not careful, then Garth is sleepy and Stanley is ugly.
It can be concluded that Stanley is ugly and Kendall is not careful once knowing that Stanley is helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not helpful, then Stanley is not sleepy and Garrick is not puzzled.
It can be concluded that Garth is not helpful and Garrick is sleepy once knowing that Stanley is puzzled. | Garrick is handsome. | contradiction |
Justin is not used.
Vicki is not used.
Justin is intelligent.
Graham is intelligent.
Vicki is comprehensive.
Quillan is used.
Vicki is not dusty.
Jimmy is not used.
Quinn is not used.
Justin is right.
Graham is not comprehensive.
Graham is not used.Quinn being tense is equivalent to Justin being dusty.
If someone is both not comprehensive and used, then he is right.
If all people are not right, then Jimmy is used.
If someone who is not tense is also not used, then he is not intelligent.
Someone who is not used is always both not tense and intelligent.
If someone is intelligent and right, then he is both used and dusty, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either tense or dusty, then Jimmy is not used and Quillan is intelligent.
If there is at least one people who is both not intelligent and used, then Jimmy is not comprehensive.
If there is at least one people who is both right and used, then Graham is not comprehensive.
if there is at least one people who is not intelligent and dusty, then Graham is not comprehensive and Quinn is not tense.
Jimmy being not used implies that Graham is not tense.
If there is someone who is not intelligent, then Vicki is not comprehensive and Quinn is not tense. | Jimmy is comprehensive. | neutral |
Justin is not used.
Vicki is not used.
Justin is intelligent.
Graham is intelligent.
Vicki is comprehensive.
Quillan is used.
Vicki is not dusty.
Jimmy is not used.
Quinn is not used.
Justin is right.
Graham is not comprehensive.
Graham is not used.Quinn being tense is equivalent to Justin being dusty.
If someone is both not comprehensive and used, then he is right.
If all people are not right, then Jimmy is used.
If someone who is not tense is also not used, then he is not intelligent.
Someone who is not used is always both not tense and intelligent.
If someone is intelligent and right, then he is both used and dusty, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either tense or dusty, then Jimmy is not used and Quillan is intelligent.
If there is at least one people who is both not intelligent and used, then Jimmy is not comprehensive.
If there is at least one people who is both right and used, then Graham is not comprehensive.
if there is at least one people who is not intelligent and dusty, then Graham is not comprehensive and Quinn is not tense.
Jimmy being not used implies that Graham is not tense.
If there is someone who is not intelligent, then Vicki is not comprehensive and Quinn is not tense. | Justin is not dusty. | contradiction |
Justin is not used.
Vicki is not used.
Justin is intelligent.
Graham is intelligent.
Vicki is comprehensive.
Quillan is used.
Vicki is not dusty.
Jimmy is not used.
Quinn is not used.
Justin is right.
Graham is not comprehensive.
Graham is not used.Quinn being tense is equivalent to Justin being dusty.
If someone is both not comprehensive and used, then he is right.
If all people are not right, then Jimmy is used.
If someone who is not tense is also not used, then he is not intelligent.
Someone who is not used is always both not tense and intelligent.
If someone is intelligent and right, then he is both used and dusty, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either tense or dusty, then Jimmy is not used and Quillan is intelligent.
If there is at least one people who is both not intelligent and used, then Jimmy is not comprehensive.
If there is at least one people who is both right and used, then Graham is not comprehensive.
if there is at least one people who is not intelligent and dusty, then Graham is not comprehensive and Quinn is not tense.
Jimmy being not used implies that Graham is not tense.
If there is someone who is not intelligent, then Vicki is not comprehensive and Quinn is not tense. | Graham is not used. | entailment |
Justin is not used.
Vicki is not used.
Justin is intelligent.
Graham is intelligent.
Vicki is comprehensive.
Quillan is used.
Vicki is not dusty.
Jimmy is not used.
Quinn is not used.
Justin is right.
Graham is not comprehensive.
Graham is not used.Quinn being tense is equivalent to Justin being dusty.
If someone is both not comprehensive and used, then he is right.
If all people are not right, then Jimmy is used.
If someone who is not tense is also not used, then he is not intelligent.
Someone who is not used is always both not tense and intelligent.
If someone is intelligent and right, then he is both used and dusty, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either tense or dusty, then Jimmy is not used and Quillan is intelligent.
If there is at least one people who is both not intelligent and used, then Jimmy is not comprehensive.
If there is at least one people who is both right and used, then Graham is not comprehensive.
if there is at least one people who is not intelligent and dusty, then Graham is not comprehensive and Quinn is not tense.
Jimmy being not used implies that Graham is not tense.
If there is someone who is not intelligent, then Vicki is not comprehensive and Quinn is not tense. | Graham is not tense. | entailment |
Justin is not used.
Vicki is not used.
Justin is intelligent.
Graham is intelligent.
Vicki is comprehensive.
Quillan is used.
Vicki is not dusty.
Jimmy is not used.
Quinn is not used.
Justin is right.
Graham is not comprehensive.
Graham is not used.Quinn being tense is equivalent to Justin being dusty.
If someone is both not comprehensive and used, then he is right.
If all people are not right, then Jimmy is used.
If someone who is not tense is also not used, then he is not intelligent.
Someone who is not used is always both not tense and intelligent.
If someone is intelligent and right, then he is both used and dusty, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either tense or dusty, then Jimmy is not used and Quillan is intelligent.
If there is at least one people who is both not intelligent and used, then Jimmy is not comprehensive.
If there is at least one people who is both right and used, then Graham is not comprehensive.
if there is at least one people who is not intelligent and dusty, then Graham is not comprehensive and Quinn is not tense.
Jimmy being not used implies that Graham is not tense.
If there is someone who is not intelligent, then Vicki is not comprehensive and Quinn is not tense. | Vicki is not comprehensive. | self_contradiction |
Justin is not used.
Vicki is not used.
Justin is intelligent.
Graham is intelligent.
Vicki is comprehensive.
Quillan is used.
Vicki is not dusty.
Jimmy is not used.
Quinn is not used.
Justin is right.
Graham is not comprehensive.
Graham is not used.Quinn being tense is equivalent to Justin being dusty.
If someone is both not comprehensive and used, then he is right.
If all people are not right, then Jimmy is used.
If someone who is not tense is also not used, then he is not intelligent.
Someone who is not used is always both not tense and intelligent.
If someone is intelligent and right, then he is both used and dusty, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either tense or dusty, then Jimmy is not used and Quillan is intelligent.
If there is at least one people who is both not intelligent and used, then Jimmy is not comprehensive.
If there is at least one people who is both right and used, then Graham is not comprehensive.
if there is at least one people who is not intelligent and dusty, then Graham is not comprehensive and Quinn is not tense.
Jimmy being not used implies that Graham is not tense.
If there is someone who is not intelligent, then Vicki is not comprehensive and Quinn is not tense. | Jimmy is used. | contradiction |
Justin is not used.
Vicki is not used.
Justin is intelligent.
Graham is intelligent.
Vicki is comprehensive.
Quillan is used.
Vicki is not dusty.
Jimmy is not used.
Quinn is not used.
Justin is right.
Graham is not comprehensive.
Graham is not used.Quinn being tense is equivalent to Justin being dusty.
If someone is both not comprehensive and used, then he is right.
If all people are not right, then Jimmy is used.
If someone who is not tense is also not used, then he is not intelligent.
Someone who is not used is always both not tense and intelligent.
If someone is intelligent and right, then he is both used and dusty, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either tense or dusty, then Jimmy is not used and Quillan is intelligent.
If there is at least one people who is both not intelligent and used, then Jimmy is not comprehensive.
If there is at least one people who is both right and used, then Graham is not comprehensive.
if there is at least one people who is not intelligent and dusty, then Graham is not comprehensive and Quinn is not tense.
Jimmy being not used implies that Graham is not tense.
If there is someone who is not intelligent, then Vicki is not comprehensive and Quinn is not tense. | Quillan is not used. | contradiction |
Justin is not used.
Vicki is not used.
Justin is intelligent.
Graham is intelligent.
Vicki is comprehensive.
Quillan is used.
Vicki is not dusty.
Jimmy is not used.
Quinn is not used.
Justin is right.
Graham is not comprehensive.
Graham is not used.Quinn being tense is equivalent to Justin being dusty.
If someone is both not comprehensive and used, then he is right.
If all people are not right, then Jimmy is used.
If someone who is not tense is also not used, then he is not intelligent.
Someone who is not used is always both not tense and intelligent.
If someone is intelligent and right, then he is both used and dusty, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either tense or dusty, then Jimmy is not used and Quillan is intelligent.
If there is at least one people who is both not intelligent and used, then Jimmy is not comprehensive.
If there is at least one people who is both right and used, then Graham is not comprehensive.
if there is at least one people who is not intelligent and dusty, then Graham is not comprehensive and Quinn is not tense.
Jimmy being not used implies that Graham is not tense.
If there is someone who is not intelligent, then Vicki is not comprehensive and Quinn is not tense. | Justin is right. | entailment |
Justin is not used.
Vicki is not used.
Justin is intelligent.
Graham is intelligent.
Vicki is comprehensive.
Quillan is used.
Vicki is not dusty.
Jimmy is not used.
Quinn is not used.
Justin is right.
Graham is not comprehensive.
Graham is not used.Quinn being tense is equivalent to Justin being dusty.
If someone is both not comprehensive and used, then he is right.
If all people are not right, then Jimmy is used.
If someone who is not tense is also not used, then he is not intelligent.
Someone who is not used is always both not tense and intelligent.
If someone is intelligent and right, then he is both used and dusty, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either tense or dusty, then Jimmy is not used and Quillan is intelligent.
If there is at least one people who is both not intelligent and used, then Jimmy is not comprehensive.
If there is at least one people who is both right and used, then Graham is not comprehensive.
if there is at least one people who is not intelligent and dusty, then Graham is not comprehensive and Quinn is not tense.
Jimmy being not used implies that Graham is not tense.
If there is someone who is not intelligent, then Vicki is not comprehensive and Quinn is not tense. | Justin is not intelligent. | self_contradiction |
Justin is not used.
Vicki is not used.
Justin is intelligent.
Graham is intelligent.
Vicki is comprehensive.
Quillan is used.
Vicki is not dusty.
Jimmy is not used.
Quinn is not used.
Justin is right.
Graham is not comprehensive.
Graham is not used.Quinn being tense is equivalent to Justin being dusty.
If someone is both not comprehensive and used, then he is right.
If all people are not right, then Jimmy is used.
If someone who is not tense is also not used, then he is not intelligent.
Someone who is not used is always both not tense and intelligent.
If someone is intelligent and right, then he is both used and dusty, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either tense or dusty, then Jimmy is not used and Quillan is intelligent.
If there is at least one people who is both not intelligent and used, then Jimmy is not comprehensive.
If there is at least one people who is both right and used, then Graham is not comprehensive.
if there is at least one people who is not intelligent and dusty, then Graham is not comprehensive and Quinn is not tense.
Jimmy being not used implies that Graham is not tense.
If there is someone who is not intelligent, then Vicki is not comprehensive and Quinn is not tense. | Quillan is not intelligent. | contradiction |
Justin is not used.
Vicki is not used.
Justin is intelligent.
Graham is intelligent.
Vicki is comprehensive.
Quillan is used.
Vicki is not dusty.
Jimmy is not used.
Quinn is not used.
Justin is right.
Graham is not comprehensive.
Graham is not used.Quinn being tense is equivalent to Justin being dusty.
If someone is both not comprehensive and used, then he is right.
If all people are not right, then Jimmy is used.
If someone who is not tense is also not used, then he is not intelligent.
Someone who is not used is always both not tense and intelligent.
If someone is intelligent and right, then he is both used and dusty, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either tense or dusty, then Jimmy is not used and Quillan is intelligent.
If there is at least one people who is both not intelligent and used, then Jimmy is not comprehensive.
If there is at least one people who is both right and used, then Graham is not comprehensive.
if there is at least one people who is not intelligent and dusty, then Graham is not comprehensive and Quinn is not tense.
Jimmy being not used implies that Graham is not tense.
If there is someone who is not intelligent, then Vicki is not comprehensive and Quinn is not tense. | Scott is comprehensive. | neutral |
Justin is not used.
Vicki is not used.
Justin is intelligent.
Graham is intelligent.
Vicki is comprehensive.
Quillan is used.
Vicki is not dusty.
Jimmy is not used.
Quinn is not used.
Justin is right.
Graham is not comprehensive.
Graham is not used.Quinn being tense is equivalent to Justin being dusty.
If someone is both not comprehensive and used, then he is right.
If all people are not right, then Jimmy is used.
If someone who is not tense is also not used, then he is not intelligent.
Someone who is not used is always both not tense and intelligent.
If someone is intelligent and right, then he is both used and dusty, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either tense or dusty, then Jimmy is not used and Quillan is intelligent.
If there is at least one people who is both not intelligent and used, then Jimmy is not comprehensive.
If there is at least one people who is both right and used, then Graham is not comprehensive.
if there is at least one people who is not intelligent and dusty, then Graham is not comprehensive and Quinn is not tense.
Jimmy being not used implies that Graham is not tense.
If there is someone who is not intelligent, then Vicki is not comprehensive and Quinn is not tense. | Vicki is comprehensive. | self_contradiction |
Justin is not used.
Vicki is not used.
Justin is intelligent.
Graham is intelligent.
Vicki is comprehensive.
Quillan is used.
Vicki is not dusty.
Jimmy is not used.
Quinn is not used.
Justin is right.
Graham is not comprehensive.
Graham is not used.Quinn being tense is equivalent to Justin being dusty.
If someone is both not comprehensive and used, then he is right.
If all people are not right, then Jimmy is used.
If someone who is not tense is also not used, then he is not intelligent.
Someone who is not used is always both not tense and intelligent.
If someone is intelligent and right, then he is both used and dusty, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either tense or dusty, then Jimmy is not used and Quillan is intelligent.
If there is at least one people who is both not intelligent and used, then Jimmy is not comprehensive.
If there is at least one people who is both right and used, then Graham is not comprehensive.
if there is at least one people who is not intelligent and dusty, then Graham is not comprehensive and Quinn is not tense.
Jimmy being not used implies that Graham is not tense.
If there is someone who is not intelligent, then Vicki is not comprehensive and Quinn is not tense. | Jimmy is not comprehensive. | neutral |
Justin is not used.
Vicki is not used.
Justin is intelligent.
Graham is intelligent.
Vicki is comprehensive.
Quillan is used.
Vicki is not dusty.
Jimmy is not used.
Quinn is not used.
Justin is right.
Graham is not comprehensive.
Graham is not used.Quinn being tense is equivalent to Justin being dusty.
If someone is both not comprehensive and used, then he is right.
If all people are not right, then Jimmy is used.
If someone who is not tense is also not used, then he is not intelligent.
Someone who is not used is always both not tense and intelligent.
If someone is intelligent and right, then he is both used and dusty, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either tense or dusty, then Jimmy is not used and Quillan is intelligent.
If there is at least one people who is both not intelligent and used, then Jimmy is not comprehensive.
If there is at least one people who is both right and used, then Graham is not comprehensive.
if there is at least one people who is not intelligent and dusty, then Graham is not comprehensive and Quinn is not tense.
Jimmy being not used implies that Graham is not tense.
If there is someone who is not intelligent, then Vicki is not comprehensive and Quinn is not tense. | Justin is not used. | self_contradiction |
Justin is not used.
Vicki is not used.
Justin is intelligent.
Graham is intelligent.
Vicki is comprehensive.
Quillan is used.
Vicki is not dusty.
Jimmy is not used.
Quinn is not used.
Justin is right.
Graham is not comprehensive.
Graham is not used.Quinn being tense is equivalent to Justin being dusty.
If someone is both not comprehensive and used, then he is right.
If all people are not right, then Jimmy is used.
If someone who is not tense is also not used, then he is not intelligent.
Someone who is not used is always both not tense and intelligent.
If someone is intelligent and right, then he is both used and dusty, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either tense or dusty, then Jimmy is not used and Quillan is intelligent.
If there is at least one people who is both not intelligent and used, then Jimmy is not comprehensive.
If there is at least one people who is both right and used, then Graham is not comprehensive.
if there is at least one people who is not intelligent and dusty, then Graham is not comprehensive and Quinn is not tense.
Jimmy being not used implies that Graham is not tense.
If there is someone who is not intelligent, then Vicki is not comprehensive and Quinn is not tense. | Quinn is not used. | entailment |
Justin is not used.
Vicki is not used.
Justin is intelligent.
Graham is intelligent.
Vicki is comprehensive.
Quillan is used.
Vicki is not dusty.
Jimmy is not used.
Quinn is not used.
Justin is right.
Graham is not comprehensive.
Graham is not used.Quinn being tense is equivalent to Justin being dusty.
If someone is both not comprehensive and used, then he is right.
If all people are not right, then Jimmy is used.
If someone who is not tense is also not used, then he is not intelligent.
Someone who is not used is always both not tense and intelligent.
If someone is intelligent and right, then he is both used and dusty, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either tense or dusty, then Jimmy is not used and Quillan is intelligent.
If there is at least one people who is both not intelligent and used, then Jimmy is not comprehensive.
If there is at least one people who is both right and used, then Graham is not comprehensive.
if there is at least one people who is not intelligent and dusty, then Graham is not comprehensive and Quinn is not tense.
Jimmy being not used implies that Graham is not tense.
If there is someone who is not intelligent, then Vicki is not comprehensive and Quinn is not tense. | Quinn is tense. | self_contradiction |
Justin is not used.
Vicki is not used.
Justin is intelligent.
Graham is intelligent.
Vicki is comprehensive.
Quillan is used.
Vicki is not dusty.
Jimmy is not used.
Quinn is not used.
Justin is right.
Graham is not comprehensive.
Graham is not used.Quinn being tense is equivalent to Justin being dusty.
If someone is both not comprehensive and used, then he is right.
If all people are not right, then Jimmy is used.
If someone who is not tense is also not used, then he is not intelligent.
Someone who is not used is always both not tense and intelligent.
If someone is intelligent and right, then he is both used and dusty, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either tense or dusty, then Jimmy is not used and Quillan is intelligent.
If there is at least one people who is both not intelligent and used, then Jimmy is not comprehensive.
If there is at least one people who is both right and used, then Graham is not comprehensive.
if there is at least one people who is not intelligent and dusty, then Graham is not comprehensive and Quinn is not tense.
Jimmy being not used implies that Graham is not tense.
If there is someone who is not intelligent, then Vicki is not comprehensive and Quinn is not tense. | Quillan is not right. | neutral |
Justin is not used.
Vicki is not used.
Justin is intelligent.
Graham is intelligent.
Vicki is comprehensive.
Quillan is used.
Vicki is not dusty.
Jimmy is not used.
Quinn is not used.
Justin is right.
Graham is not comprehensive.
Graham is not used.Quinn being tense is equivalent to Justin being dusty.
If someone is both not comprehensive and used, then he is right.
If all people are not right, then Jimmy is used.
If someone who is not tense is also not used, then he is not intelligent.
Someone who is not used is always both not tense and intelligent.
If someone is intelligent and right, then he is both used and dusty, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either tense or dusty, then Jimmy is not used and Quillan is intelligent.
If there is at least one people who is both not intelligent and used, then Jimmy is not comprehensive.
If there is at least one people who is both right and used, then Graham is not comprehensive.
if there is at least one people who is not intelligent and dusty, then Graham is not comprehensive and Quinn is not tense.
Jimmy being not used implies that Graham is not tense.
If there is someone who is not intelligent, then Vicki is not comprehensive and Quinn is not tense. | Vicki is not tense. | entailment |
Justin is not used.
Vicki is not used.
Justin is intelligent.
Graham is intelligent.
Vicki is comprehensive.
Quillan is used.
Vicki is not dusty.
Jimmy is not used.
Quinn is not used.
Justin is right.
Graham is not comprehensive.
Graham is not used.Quinn being tense is equivalent to Justin being dusty.
If someone is both not comprehensive and used, then he is right.
If all people are not right, then Jimmy is used.
If someone who is not tense is also not used, then he is not intelligent.
Someone who is not used is always both not tense and intelligent.
If someone is intelligent and right, then he is both used and dusty, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either tense or dusty, then Jimmy is not used and Quillan is intelligent.
If there is at least one people who is both not intelligent and used, then Jimmy is not comprehensive.
If there is at least one people who is both right and used, then Graham is not comprehensive.
if there is at least one people who is not intelligent and dusty, then Graham is not comprehensive and Quinn is not tense.
Jimmy being not used implies that Graham is not tense.
If there is someone who is not intelligent, then Vicki is not comprehensive and Quinn is not tense. | Justin is tense. | contradiction |
Justin is not used.
Vicki is not used.
Justin is intelligent.
Graham is intelligent.
Vicki is comprehensive.
Quillan is used.
Vicki is not dusty.
Jimmy is not used.
Quinn is not used.
Justin is right.
Graham is not comprehensive.
Graham is not used.Quinn being tense is equivalent to Justin being dusty.
If someone is both not comprehensive and used, then he is right.
If all people are not right, then Jimmy is used.
If someone who is not tense is also not used, then he is not intelligent.
Someone who is not used is always both not tense and intelligent.
If someone is intelligent and right, then he is both used and dusty, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either tense or dusty, then Jimmy is not used and Quillan is intelligent.
If there is at least one people who is both not intelligent and used, then Jimmy is not comprehensive.
If there is at least one people who is both right and used, then Graham is not comprehensive.
if there is at least one people who is not intelligent and dusty, then Graham is not comprehensive and Quinn is not tense.
Jimmy being not used implies that Graham is not tense.
If there is someone who is not intelligent, then Vicki is not comprehensive and Quinn is not tense. | Jimmy is not right. | neutral |
Melody is clear.
Kendall is not brave.
Conroy is not clear.
Nathalie is discreet.
Neil is not worried.
Kendall is not tired.
Melody is naughty.
Neil is not brave.
Beverly is not tired.
Kendall is not discreet.
Neil is not naughty.
Beverly is clear.Melody being brave and Beverly being not tired imply that Beverly is not worried.
As long as someone is either not discreet or worried, he is naughty and not clear.
If Beverly is discreet, then Cedric is not worried.
If there is someone who is naughty, then Beverly is not worried.
If Melody is not naughty, then Melody is worried, and vice versa.
Cedric being not brave and Kendall being not naughty are equivalent to Nathalie being not discreet and Nathalie being tired.
If someone who is discreet is also not brave, then he is naughty.
Conroy being not discreet is equivalent to Nathalie being worried and Beverly being brave.
As long as someone is not discreet, he is naughty and brave.
If someone is not discreet, then he is both clear and not brave.
If someone is worried, then he is not brave, and vice versa.
If Cedric is not naughty or Nathalie is clear, then Conroy is brave. | Conroy is clear. | contradiction |
Melody is clear.
Kendall is not brave.
Conroy is not clear.
Nathalie is discreet.
Neil is not worried.
Kendall is not tired.
Melody is naughty.
Neil is not brave.
Beverly is not tired.
Kendall is not discreet.
Neil is not naughty.
Beverly is clear.Melody being brave and Beverly being not tired imply that Beverly is not worried.
As long as someone is either not discreet or worried, he is naughty and not clear.
If Beverly is discreet, then Cedric is not worried.
If there is someone who is naughty, then Beverly is not worried.
If Melody is not naughty, then Melody is worried, and vice versa.
Cedric being not brave and Kendall being not naughty are equivalent to Nathalie being not discreet and Nathalie being tired.
If someone who is discreet is also not brave, then he is naughty.
Conroy being not discreet is equivalent to Nathalie being worried and Beverly being brave.
As long as someone is not discreet, he is naughty and brave.
If someone is not discreet, then he is both clear and not brave.
If someone is worried, then he is not brave, and vice versa.
If Cedric is not naughty or Nathalie is clear, then Conroy is brave. | Beverly is discreet. | neutral |
Melody is clear.
Kendall is not brave.
Conroy is not clear.
Nathalie is discreet.
Neil is not worried.
Kendall is not tired.
Melody is naughty.
Neil is not brave.
Beverly is not tired.
Kendall is not discreet.
Neil is not naughty.
Beverly is clear.Melody being brave and Beverly being not tired imply that Beverly is not worried.
As long as someone is either not discreet or worried, he is naughty and not clear.
If Beverly is discreet, then Cedric is not worried.
If there is someone who is naughty, then Beverly is not worried.
If Melody is not naughty, then Melody is worried, and vice versa.
Cedric being not brave and Kendall being not naughty are equivalent to Nathalie being not discreet and Nathalie being tired.
If someone who is discreet is also not brave, then he is naughty.
Conroy being not discreet is equivalent to Nathalie being worried and Beverly being brave.
As long as someone is not discreet, he is naughty and brave.
If someone is not discreet, then he is both clear and not brave.
If someone is worried, then he is not brave, and vice versa.
If Cedric is not naughty or Nathalie is clear, then Conroy is brave. | Melody is naughty. | entailment |
Melody is clear.
Kendall is not brave.
Conroy is not clear.
Nathalie is discreet.
Neil is not worried.
Kendall is not tired.
Melody is naughty.
Neil is not brave.
Beverly is not tired.
Kendall is not discreet.
Neil is not naughty.
Beverly is clear.Melody being brave and Beverly being not tired imply that Beverly is not worried.
As long as someone is either not discreet or worried, he is naughty and not clear.
If Beverly is discreet, then Cedric is not worried.
If there is someone who is naughty, then Beverly is not worried.
If Melody is not naughty, then Melody is worried, and vice versa.
Cedric being not brave and Kendall being not naughty are equivalent to Nathalie being not discreet and Nathalie being tired.
If someone who is discreet is also not brave, then he is naughty.
Conroy being not discreet is equivalent to Nathalie being worried and Beverly being brave.
As long as someone is not discreet, he is naughty and brave.
If someone is not discreet, then he is both clear and not brave.
If someone is worried, then he is not brave, and vice versa.
If Cedric is not naughty or Nathalie is clear, then Conroy is brave. | Cedric is brave. | neutral |
Melody is clear.
Kendall is not brave.
Conroy is not clear.
Nathalie is discreet.
Neil is not worried.
Kendall is not tired.
Melody is naughty.
Neil is not brave.
Beverly is not tired.
Kendall is not discreet.
Neil is not naughty.
Beverly is clear.Melody being brave and Beverly being not tired imply that Beverly is not worried.
As long as someone is either not discreet or worried, he is naughty and not clear.
If Beverly is discreet, then Cedric is not worried.
If there is someone who is naughty, then Beverly is not worried.
If Melody is not naughty, then Melody is worried, and vice versa.
Cedric being not brave and Kendall being not naughty are equivalent to Nathalie being not discreet and Nathalie being tired.
If someone who is discreet is also not brave, then he is naughty.
Conroy being not discreet is equivalent to Nathalie being worried and Beverly being brave.
As long as someone is not discreet, he is naughty and brave.
If someone is not discreet, then he is both clear and not brave.
If someone is worried, then he is not brave, and vice versa.
If Cedric is not naughty or Nathalie is clear, then Conroy is brave. | Kendall is tired. | contradiction |
Melody is clear.
Kendall is not brave.
Conroy is not clear.
Nathalie is discreet.
Neil is not worried.
Kendall is not tired.
Melody is naughty.
Neil is not brave.
Beverly is not tired.
Kendall is not discreet.
Neil is not naughty.
Beverly is clear.Melody being brave and Beverly being not tired imply that Beverly is not worried.
As long as someone is either not discreet or worried, he is naughty and not clear.
If Beverly is discreet, then Cedric is not worried.
If there is someone who is naughty, then Beverly is not worried.
If Melody is not naughty, then Melody is worried, and vice versa.
Cedric being not brave and Kendall being not naughty are equivalent to Nathalie being not discreet and Nathalie being tired.
If someone who is discreet is also not brave, then he is naughty.
Conroy being not discreet is equivalent to Nathalie being worried and Beverly being brave.
As long as someone is not discreet, he is naughty and brave.
If someone is not discreet, then he is both clear and not brave.
If someone is worried, then he is not brave, and vice versa.
If Cedric is not naughty or Nathalie is clear, then Conroy is brave. | Beverly is not discreet. | neutral |
Melody is clear.
Kendall is not brave.
Conroy is not clear.
Nathalie is discreet.
Neil is not worried.
Kendall is not tired.
Melody is naughty.
Neil is not brave.
Beverly is not tired.
Kendall is not discreet.
Neil is not naughty.
Beverly is clear.Melody being brave and Beverly being not tired imply that Beverly is not worried.
As long as someone is either not discreet or worried, he is naughty and not clear.
If Beverly is discreet, then Cedric is not worried.
If there is someone who is naughty, then Beverly is not worried.
If Melody is not naughty, then Melody is worried, and vice versa.
Cedric being not brave and Kendall being not naughty are equivalent to Nathalie being not discreet and Nathalie being tired.
If someone who is discreet is also not brave, then he is naughty.
Conroy being not discreet is equivalent to Nathalie being worried and Beverly being brave.
As long as someone is not discreet, he is naughty and brave.
If someone is not discreet, then he is both clear and not brave.
If someone is worried, then he is not brave, and vice versa.
If Cedric is not naughty or Nathalie is clear, then Conroy is brave. | Melody is not clear. | contradiction |
Melody is clear.
Kendall is not brave.
Conroy is not clear.
Nathalie is discreet.
Neil is not worried.
Kendall is not tired.
Melody is naughty.
Neil is not brave.
Beverly is not tired.
Kendall is not discreet.
Neil is not naughty.
Beverly is clear.Melody being brave and Beverly being not tired imply that Beverly is not worried.
As long as someone is either not discreet or worried, he is naughty and not clear.
If Beverly is discreet, then Cedric is not worried.
If there is someone who is naughty, then Beverly is not worried.
If Melody is not naughty, then Melody is worried, and vice versa.
Cedric being not brave and Kendall being not naughty are equivalent to Nathalie being not discreet and Nathalie being tired.
If someone who is discreet is also not brave, then he is naughty.
Conroy being not discreet is equivalent to Nathalie being worried and Beverly being brave.
As long as someone is not discreet, he is naughty and brave.
If someone is not discreet, then he is both clear and not brave.
If someone is worried, then he is not brave, and vice versa.
If Cedric is not naughty or Nathalie is clear, then Conroy is brave. | Kendall is clear. | self_contradiction |
Melody is clear.
Kendall is not brave.
Conroy is not clear.
Nathalie is discreet.
Neil is not worried.
Kendall is not tired.
Melody is naughty.
Neil is not brave.
Beverly is not tired.
Kendall is not discreet.
Neil is not naughty.
Beverly is clear.Melody being brave and Beverly being not tired imply that Beverly is not worried.
As long as someone is either not discreet or worried, he is naughty and not clear.
If Beverly is discreet, then Cedric is not worried.
If there is someone who is naughty, then Beverly is not worried.
If Melody is not naughty, then Melody is worried, and vice versa.
Cedric being not brave and Kendall being not naughty are equivalent to Nathalie being not discreet and Nathalie being tired.
If someone who is discreet is also not brave, then he is naughty.
Conroy being not discreet is equivalent to Nathalie being worried and Beverly being brave.
As long as someone is not discreet, he is naughty and brave.
If someone is not discreet, then he is both clear and not brave.
If someone is worried, then he is not brave, and vice versa.
If Cedric is not naughty or Nathalie is clear, then Conroy is brave. | Beverly is not tired. | entailment |
Melody is clear.
Kendall is not brave.
Conroy is not clear.
Nathalie is discreet.
Neil is not worried.
Kendall is not tired.
Melody is naughty.
Neil is not brave.
Beverly is not tired.
Kendall is not discreet.
Neil is not naughty.
Beverly is clear.Melody being brave and Beverly being not tired imply that Beverly is not worried.
As long as someone is either not discreet or worried, he is naughty and not clear.
If Beverly is discreet, then Cedric is not worried.
If there is someone who is naughty, then Beverly is not worried.
If Melody is not naughty, then Melody is worried, and vice versa.
Cedric being not brave and Kendall being not naughty are equivalent to Nathalie being not discreet and Nathalie being tired.
If someone who is discreet is also not brave, then he is naughty.
Conroy being not discreet is equivalent to Nathalie being worried and Beverly being brave.
As long as someone is not discreet, he is naughty and brave.
If someone is not discreet, then he is both clear and not brave.
If someone is worried, then he is not brave, and vice versa.
If Cedric is not naughty or Nathalie is clear, then Conroy is brave. | Neil is worried. | self_contradiction |
Melody is clear.
Kendall is not brave.
Conroy is not clear.
Nathalie is discreet.
Neil is not worried.
Kendall is not tired.
Melody is naughty.
Neil is not brave.
Beverly is not tired.
Kendall is not discreet.
Neil is not naughty.
Beverly is clear.Melody being brave and Beverly being not tired imply that Beverly is not worried.
As long as someone is either not discreet or worried, he is naughty and not clear.
If Beverly is discreet, then Cedric is not worried.
If there is someone who is naughty, then Beverly is not worried.
If Melody is not naughty, then Melody is worried, and vice versa.
Cedric being not brave and Kendall being not naughty are equivalent to Nathalie being not discreet and Nathalie being tired.
If someone who is discreet is also not brave, then he is naughty.
Conroy being not discreet is equivalent to Nathalie being worried and Beverly being brave.
As long as someone is not discreet, he is naughty and brave.
If someone is not discreet, then he is both clear and not brave.
If someone is worried, then he is not brave, and vice versa.
If Cedric is not naughty or Nathalie is clear, then Conroy is brave. | Kendall is worried. | entailment |
Melody is clear.
Kendall is not brave.
Conroy is not clear.
Nathalie is discreet.
Neil is not worried.
Kendall is not tired.
Melody is naughty.
Neil is not brave.
Beverly is not tired.
Kendall is not discreet.
Neil is not naughty.
Beverly is clear.Melody being brave and Beverly being not tired imply that Beverly is not worried.
As long as someone is either not discreet or worried, he is naughty and not clear.
If Beverly is discreet, then Cedric is not worried.
If there is someone who is naughty, then Beverly is not worried.
If Melody is not naughty, then Melody is worried, and vice versa.
Cedric being not brave and Kendall being not naughty are equivalent to Nathalie being not discreet and Nathalie being tired.
If someone who is discreet is also not brave, then he is naughty.
Conroy being not discreet is equivalent to Nathalie being worried and Beverly being brave.
As long as someone is not discreet, he is naughty and brave.
If someone is not discreet, then he is both clear and not brave.
If someone is worried, then he is not brave, and vice versa.
If Cedric is not naughty or Nathalie is clear, then Conroy is brave. | Neil is not worried. | self_contradiction |
Melody is clear.
Kendall is not brave.
Conroy is not clear.
Nathalie is discreet.
Neil is not worried.
Kendall is not tired.
Melody is naughty.
Neil is not brave.
Beverly is not tired.
Kendall is not discreet.
Neil is not naughty.
Beverly is clear.Melody being brave and Beverly being not tired imply that Beverly is not worried.
As long as someone is either not discreet or worried, he is naughty and not clear.
If Beverly is discreet, then Cedric is not worried.
If there is someone who is naughty, then Beverly is not worried.
If Melody is not naughty, then Melody is worried, and vice versa.
Cedric being not brave and Kendall being not naughty are equivalent to Nathalie being not discreet and Nathalie being tired.
If someone who is discreet is also not brave, then he is naughty.
Conroy being not discreet is equivalent to Nathalie being worried and Beverly being brave.
As long as someone is not discreet, he is naughty and brave.
If someone is not discreet, then he is both clear and not brave.
If someone is worried, then he is not brave, and vice versa.
If Cedric is not naughty or Nathalie is clear, then Conroy is brave. | Neil is naughty. | self_contradiction |
Melody is clear.
Kendall is not brave.
Conroy is not clear.
Nathalie is discreet.
Neil is not worried.
Kendall is not tired.
Melody is naughty.
Neil is not brave.
Beverly is not tired.
Kendall is not discreet.
Neil is not naughty.
Beverly is clear.Melody being brave and Beverly being not tired imply that Beverly is not worried.
As long as someone is either not discreet or worried, he is naughty and not clear.
If Beverly is discreet, then Cedric is not worried.
If there is someone who is naughty, then Beverly is not worried.
If Melody is not naughty, then Melody is worried, and vice versa.
Cedric being not brave and Kendall being not naughty are equivalent to Nathalie being not discreet and Nathalie being tired.
If someone who is discreet is also not brave, then he is naughty.
Conroy being not discreet is equivalent to Nathalie being worried and Beverly being brave.
As long as someone is not discreet, he is naughty and brave.
If someone is not discreet, then he is both clear and not brave.
If someone is worried, then he is not brave, and vice versa.
If Cedric is not naughty or Nathalie is clear, then Conroy is brave. | Beverly is worried. | contradiction |
Melody is clear.
Kendall is not brave.
Conroy is not clear.
Nathalie is discreet.
Neil is not worried.
Kendall is not tired.
Melody is naughty.
Neil is not brave.
Beverly is not tired.
Kendall is not discreet.
Neil is not naughty.
Beverly is clear.Melody being brave and Beverly being not tired imply that Beverly is not worried.
As long as someone is either not discreet or worried, he is naughty and not clear.
If Beverly is discreet, then Cedric is not worried.
If there is someone who is naughty, then Beverly is not worried.
If Melody is not naughty, then Melody is worried, and vice versa.
Cedric being not brave and Kendall being not naughty are equivalent to Nathalie being not discreet and Nathalie being tired.
If someone who is discreet is also not brave, then he is naughty.
Conroy being not discreet is equivalent to Nathalie being worried and Beverly being brave.
As long as someone is not discreet, he is naughty and brave.
If someone is not discreet, then he is both clear and not brave.
If someone is worried, then he is not brave, and vice versa.
If Cedric is not naughty or Nathalie is clear, then Conroy is brave. | Neil is not clear. | entailment |
Melody is clear.
Kendall is not brave.
Conroy is not clear.
Nathalie is discreet.
Neil is not worried.
Kendall is not tired.
Melody is naughty.
Neil is not brave.
Beverly is not tired.
Kendall is not discreet.
Neil is not naughty.
Beverly is clear.Melody being brave and Beverly being not tired imply that Beverly is not worried.
As long as someone is either not discreet or worried, he is naughty and not clear.
If Beverly is discreet, then Cedric is not worried.
If there is someone who is naughty, then Beverly is not worried.
If Melody is not naughty, then Melody is worried, and vice versa.
Cedric being not brave and Kendall being not naughty are equivalent to Nathalie being not discreet and Nathalie being tired.
If someone who is discreet is also not brave, then he is naughty.
Conroy being not discreet is equivalent to Nathalie being worried and Beverly being brave.
As long as someone is not discreet, he is naughty and brave.
If someone is not discreet, then he is both clear and not brave.
If someone is worried, then he is not brave, and vice versa.
If Cedric is not naughty or Nathalie is clear, then Conroy is brave. | Kendall is not brave. | self_contradiction |
Melody is clear.
Kendall is not brave.
Conroy is not clear.
Nathalie is discreet.
Neil is not worried.
Kendall is not tired.
Melody is naughty.
Neil is not brave.
Beverly is not tired.
Kendall is not discreet.
Neil is not naughty.
Beverly is clear.Melody being brave and Beverly being not tired imply that Beverly is not worried.
As long as someone is either not discreet or worried, he is naughty and not clear.
If Beverly is discreet, then Cedric is not worried.
If there is someone who is naughty, then Beverly is not worried.
If Melody is not naughty, then Melody is worried, and vice versa.
Cedric being not brave and Kendall being not naughty are equivalent to Nathalie being not discreet and Nathalie being tired.
If someone who is discreet is also not brave, then he is naughty.
Conroy being not discreet is equivalent to Nathalie being worried and Beverly being brave.
As long as someone is not discreet, he is naughty and brave.
If someone is not discreet, then he is both clear and not brave.
If someone is worried, then he is not brave, and vice versa.
If Cedric is not naughty or Nathalie is clear, then Conroy is brave. | Conroy is tired. | neutral |
Melody is clear.
Kendall is not brave.
Conroy is not clear.
Nathalie is discreet.
Neil is not worried.
Kendall is not tired.
Melody is naughty.
Neil is not brave.
Beverly is not tired.
Kendall is not discreet.
Neil is not naughty.
Beverly is clear.Melody being brave and Beverly being not tired imply that Beverly is not worried.
As long as someone is either not discreet or worried, he is naughty and not clear.
If Beverly is discreet, then Cedric is not worried.
If there is someone who is naughty, then Beverly is not worried.
If Melody is not naughty, then Melody is worried, and vice versa.
Cedric being not brave and Kendall being not naughty are equivalent to Nathalie being not discreet and Nathalie being tired.
If someone who is discreet is also not brave, then he is naughty.
Conroy being not discreet is equivalent to Nathalie being worried and Beverly being brave.
As long as someone is not discreet, he is naughty and brave.
If someone is not discreet, then he is both clear and not brave.
If someone is worried, then he is not brave, and vice versa.
If Cedric is not naughty or Nathalie is clear, then Conroy is brave. | Cedric is naughty. | neutral |
Melody is clear.
Kendall is not brave.
Conroy is not clear.
Nathalie is discreet.
Neil is not worried.
Kendall is not tired.
Melody is naughty.
Neil is not brave.
Beverly is not tired.
Kendall is not discreet.
Neil is not naughty.
Beverly is clear.Melody being brave and Beverly being not tired imply that Beverly is not worried.
As long as someone is either not discreet or worried, he is naughty and not clear.
If Beverly is discreet, then Cedric is not worried.
If there is someone who is naughty, then Beverly is not worried.
If Melody is not naughty, then Melody is worried, and vice versa.
Cedric being not brave and Kendall being not naughty are equivalent to Nathalie being not discreet and Nathalie being tired.
If someone who is discreet is also not brave, then he is naughty.
Conroy being not discreet is equivalent to Nathalie being worried and Beverly being brave.
As long as someone is not discreet, he is naughty and brave.
If someone is not discreet, then he is both clear and not brave.
If someone is worried, then he is not brave, and vice versa.
If Cedric is not naughty or Nathalie is clear, then Conroy is brave. | Beverly is tired. | contradiction |
Melody is clear.
Kendall is not brave.
Conroy is not clear.
Nathalie is discreet.
Neil is not worried.
Kendall is not tired.
Melody is naughty.
Neil is not brave.
Beverly is not tired.
Kendall is not discreet.
Neil is not naughty.
Beverly is clear.Melody being brave and Beverly being not tired imply that Beverly is not worried.
As long as someone is either not discreet or worried, he is naughty and not clear.
If Beverly is discreet, then Cedric is not worried.
If there is someone who is naughty, then Beverly is not worried.
If Melody is not naughty, then Melody is worried, and vice versa.
Cedric being not brave and Kendall being not naughty are equivalent to Nathalie being not discreet and Nathalie being tired.
If someone who is discreet is also not brave, then he is naughty.
Conroy being not discreet is equivalent to Nathalie being worried and Beverly being brave.
As long as someone is not discreet, he is naughty and brave.
If someone is not discreet, then he is both clear and not brave.
If someone is worried, then he is not brave, and vice versa.
If Cedric is not naughty or Nathalie is clear, then Conroy is brave. | Melody is clear. | entailment |
Phineas is cute.
Pierce is chestnut.
Lauren is cute.
Alexia is upset.
Alexia is strange.
Pierce is not strange.
Pierce is not cute.
Pierce is not funny.
Amery is chestnut.
Lauren is funny.
Arthur is not strange.
Alexia is not large.Someone being upset is equivalent to being large.
Someone is not chestnut and not cute if and only if he is not funny and not strange.
If there is at least one people who is not cute or upset, then Phineas is not strange.
Phineas being not chestnut or Pierce being not strange implies that Amery is not funny.
Someone who is eithor upset or not funny is always chestnut.
Phineas being not chestnut and Pierce being upset imply that Alexia is not strange.
It can be concluded that Alexia is strange once knowing that Douglas is not large.
If Lauren is not funny, then Pierce is not cute and Pierce is chestnut.
Lauren being not cute and Arthur being not funny imply that Alexia is upset and Phineas is chestnut.
If there is someone who is funny, then Phineas is not upset and Douglas is not strange.
If there is at least one people who is either not strange or chestnut, then Alexia is upset and Arthur is not large.
If someone is not large and chestnut, then he is not cute and not strange. | Amery is cute. | neutral |
Phineas is cute.
Pierce is chestnut.
Lauren is cute.
Alexia is upset.
Alexia is strange.
Pierce is not strange.
Pierce is not cute.
Pierce is not funny.
Amery is chestnut.
Lauren is funny.
Arthur is not strange.
Alexia is not large.Someone being upset is equivalent to being large.
Someone is not chestnut and not cute if and only if he is not funny and not strange.
If there is at least one people who is not cute or upset, then Phineas is not strange.
Phineas being not chestnut or Pierce being not strange implies that Amery is not funny.
Someone who is eithor upset or not funny is always chestnut.
Phineas being not chestnut and Pierce being upset imply that Alexia is not strange.
It can be concluded that Alexia is strange once knowing that Douglas is not large.
If Lauren is not funny, then Pierce is not cute and Pierce is chestnut.
Lauren being not cute and Arthur being not funny imply that Alexia is upset and Phineas is chestnut.
If there is someone who is funny, then Phineas is not upset and Douglas is not strange.
If there is at least one people who is either not strange or chestnut, then Alexia is upset and Arthur is not large.
If someone is not large and chestnut, then he is not cute and not strange. | Arthur is strange. | contradiction |
Phineas is cute.
Pierce is chestnut.
Lauren is cute.
Alexia is upset.
Alexia is strange.
Pierce is not strange.
Pierce is not cute.
Pierce is not funny.
Amery is chestnut.
Lauren is funny.
Arthur is not strange.
Alexia is not large.Someone being upset is equivalent to being large.
Someone is not chestnut and not cute if and only if he is not funny and not strange.
If there is at least one people who is not cute or upset, then Phineas is not strange.
Phineas being not chestnut or Pierce being not strange implies that Amery is not funny.
Someone who is eithor upset or not funny is always chestnut.
Phineas being not chestnut and Pierce being upset imply that Alexia is not strange.
It can be concluded that Alexia is strange once knowing that Douglas is not large.
If Lauren is not funny, then Pierce is not cute and Pierce is chestnut.
Lauren being not cute and Arthur being not funny imply that Alexia is upset and Phineas is chestnut.
If there is someone who is funny, then Phineas is not upset and Douglas is not strange.
If there is at least one people who is either not strange or chestnut, then Alexia is upset and Arthur is not large.
If someone is not large and chestnut, then he is not cute and not strange. | Arthur is not strange. | entailment |
Phineas is cute.
Pierce is chestnut.
Lauren is cute.
Alexia is upset.
Alexia is strange.
Pierce is not strange.
Pierce is not cute.
Pierce is not funny.
Amery is chestnut.
Lauren is funny.
Arthur is not strange.
Alexia is not large.Someone being upset is equivalent to being large.
Someone is not chestnut and not cute if and only if he is not funny and not strange.
If there is at least one people who is not cute or upset, then Phineas is not strange.
Phineas being not chestnut or Pierce being not strange implies that Amery is not funny.
Someone who is eithor upset or not funny is always chestnut.
Phineas being not chestnut and Pierce being upset imply that Alexia is not strange.
It can be concluded that Alexia is strange once knowing that Douglas is not large.
If Lauren is not funny, then Pierce is not cute and Pierce is chestnut.
Lauren being not cute and Arthur being not funny imply that Alexia is upset and Phineas is chestnut.
If there is someone who is funny, then Phineas is not upset and Douglas is not strange.
If there is at least one people who is either not strange or chestnut, then Alexia is upset and Arthur is not large.
If someone is not large and chestnut, then he is not cute and not strange. | Phineas is not cute. | contradiction |
Phineas is cute.
Pierce is chestnut.
Lauren is cute.
Alexia is upset.
Alexia is strange.
Pierce is not strange.
Pierce is not cute.
Pierce is not funny.
Amery is chestnut.
Lauren is funny.
Arthur is not strange.
Alexia is not large.Someone being upset is equivalent to being large.
Someone is not chestnut and not cute if and only if he is not funny and not strange.
If there is at least one people who is not cute or upset, then Phineas is not strange.
Phineas being not chestnut or Pierce being not strange implies that Amery is not funny.
Someone who is eithor upset or not funny is always chestnut.
Phineas being not chestnut and Pierce being upset imply that Alexia is not strange.
It can be concluded that Alexia is strange once knowing that Douglas is not large.
If Lauren is not funny, then Pierce is not cute and Pierce is chestnut.
Lauren being not cute and Arthur being not funny imply that Alexia is upset and Phineas is chestnut.
If there is someone who is funny, then Phineas is not upset and Douglas is not strange.
If there is at least one people who is either not strange or chestnut, then Alexia is upset and Arthur is not large.
If someone is not large and chestnut, then he is not cute and not strange. | Phineas is not upset. | entailment |
Phineas is cute.
Pierce is chestnut.
Lauren is cute.
Alexia is upset.
Alexia is strange.
Pierce is not strange.
Pierce is not cute.
Pierce is not funny.
Amery is chestnut.
Lauren is funny.
Arthur is not strange.
Alexia is not large.Someone being upset is equivalent to being large.
Someone is not chestnut and not cute if and only if he is not funny and not strange.
If there is at least one people who is not cute or upset, then Phineas is not strange.
Phineas being not chestnut or Pierce being not strange implies that Amery is not funny.
Someone who is eithor upset or not funny is always chestnut.
Phineas being not chestnut and Pierce being upset imply that Alexia is not strange.
It can be concluded that Alexia is strange once knowing that Douglas is not large.
If Lauren is not funny, then Pierce is not cute and Pierce is chestnut.
Lauren being not cute and Arthur being not funny imply that Alexia is upset and Phineas is chestnut.
If there is someone who is funny, then Phineas is not upset and Douglas is not strange.
If there is at least one people who is either not strange or chestnut, then Alexia is upset and Arthur is not large.
If someone is not large and chestnut, then he is not cute and not strange. | Phineas is upset. | contradiction |
Phineas is cute.
Pierce is chestnut.
Lauren is cute.
Alexia is upset.
Alexia is strange.
Pierce is not strange.
Pierce is not cute.
Pierce is not funny.
Amery is chestnut.
Lauren is funny.
Arthur is not strange.
Alexia is not large.Someone being upset is equivalent to being large.
Someone is not chestnut and not cute if and only if he is not funny and not strange.
If there is at least one people who is not cute or upset, then Phineas is not strange.
Phineas being not chestnut or Pierce being not strange implies that Amery is not funny.
Someone who is eithor upset or not funny is always chestnut.
Phineas being not chestnut and Pierce being upset imply that Alexia is not strange.
It can be concluded that Alexia is strange once knowing that Douglas is not large.
If Lauren is not funny, then Pierce is not cute and Pierce is chestnut.
Lauren being not cute and Arthur being not funny imply that Alexia is upset and Phineas is chestnut.
If there is someone who is funny, then Phineas is not upset and Douglas is not strange.
If there is at least one people who is either not strange or chestnut, then Alexia is upset and Arthur is not large.
If someone is not large and chestnut, then he is not cute and not strange. | Pierce is not funny. | entailment |
Phineas is cute.
Pierce is chestnut.
Lauren is cute.
Alexia is upset.
Alexia is strange.
Pierce is not strange.
Pierce is not cute.
Pierce is not funny.
Amery is chestnut.
Lauren is funny.
Arthur is not strange.
Alexia is not large.Someone being upset is equivalent to being large.
Someone is not chestnut and not cute if and only if he is not funny and not strange.
If there is at least one people who is not cute or upset, then Phineas is not strange.
Phineas being not chestnut or Pierce being not strange implies that Amery is not funny.
Someone who is eithor upset or not funny is always chestnut.
Phineas being not chestnut and Pierce being upset imply that Alexia is not strange.
It can be concluded that Alexia is strange once knowing that Douglas is not large.
If Lauren is not funny, then Pierce is not cute and Pierce is chestnut.
Lauren being not cute and Arthur being not funny imply that Alexia is upset and Phineas is chestnut.
If there is someone who is funny, then Phineas is not upset and Douglas is not strange.
If there is at least one people who is either not strange or chestnut, then Alexia is upset and Arthur is not large.
If someone is not large and chestnut, then he is not cute and not strange. | Alexia is strange. | self_contradiction |
Phineas is cute.
Pierce is chestnut.
Lauren is cute.
Alexia is upset.
Alexia is strange.
Pierce is not strange.
Pierce is not cute.
Pierce is not funny.
Amery is chestnut.
Lauren is funny.
Arthur is not strange.
Alexia is not large.Someone being upset is equivalent to being large.
Someone is not chestnut and not cute if and only if he is not funny and not strange.
If there is at least one people who is not cute or upset, then Phineas is not strange.
Phineas being not chestnut or Pierce being not strange implies that Amery is not funny.
Someone who is eithor upset or not funny is always chestnut.
Phineas being not chestnut and Pierce being upset imply that Alexia is not strange.
It can be concluded that Alexia is strange once knowing that Douglas is not large.
If Lauren is not funny, then Pierce is not cute and Pierce is chestnut.
Lauren being not cute and Arthur being not funny imply that Alexia is upset and Phineas is chestnut.
If there is someone who is funny, then Phineas is not upset and Douglas is not strange.
If there is at least one people who is either not strange or chestnut, then Alexia is upset and Arthur is not large.
If someone is not large and chestnut, then he is not cute and not strange. | Pierce is not cute. | entailment |
Phineas is cute.
Pierce is chestnut.
Lauren is cute.
Alexia is upset.
Alexia is strange.
Pierce is not strange.
Pierce is not cute.
Pierce is not funny.
Amery is chestnut.
Lauren is funny.
Arthur is not strange.
Alexia is not large.Someone being upset is equivalent to being large.
Someone is not chestnut and not cute if and only if he is not funny and not strange.
If there is at least one people who is not cute or upset, then Phineas is not strange.
Phineas being not chestnut or Pierce being not strange implies that Amery is not funny.
Someone who is eithor upset or not funny is always chestnut.
Phineas being not chestnut and Pierce being upset imply that Alexia is not strange.
It can be concluded that Alexia is strange once knowing that Douglas is not large.
If Lauren is not funny, then Pierce is not cute and Pierce is chestnut.
Lauren being not cute and Arthur being not funny imply that Alexia is upset and Phineas is chestnut.
If there is someone who is funny, then Phineas is not upset and Douglas is not strange.
If there is at least one people who is either not strange or chestnut, then Alexia is upset and Arthur is not large.
If someone is not large and chestnut, then he is not cute and not strange. | Phineas is large. | neutral |
Phineas is cute.
Pierce is chestnut.
Lauren is cute.
Alexia is upset.
Alexia is strange.
Pierce is not strange.
Pierce is not cute.
Pierce is not funny.
Amery is chestnut.
Lauren is funny.
Arthur is not strange.
Alexia is not large.Someone being upset is equivalent to being large.
Someone is not chestnut and not cute if and only if he is not funny and not strange.
If there is at least one people who is not cute or upset, then Phineas is not strange.
Phineas being not chestnut or Pierce being not strange implies that Amery is not funny.
Someone who is eithor upset or not funny is always chestnut.
Phineas being not chestnut and Pierce being upset imply that Alexia is not strange.
It can be concluded that Alexia is strange once knowing that Douglas is not large.
If Lauren is not funny, then Pierce is not cute and Pierce is chestnut.
Lauren being not cute and Arthur being not funny imply that Alexia is upset and Phineas is chestnut.
If there is someone who is funny, then Phineas is not upset and Douglas is not strange.
If there is at least one people who is either not strange or chestnut, then Alexia is upset and Arthur is not large.
If someone is not large and chestnut, then he is not cute and not strange. | Alexia is not chestnut. | contradiction |
Phineas is cute.
Pierce is chestnut.
Lauren is cute.
Alexia is upset.
Alexia is strange.
Pierce is not strange.
Pierce is not cute.
Pierce is not funny.
Amery is chestnut.
Lauren is funny.
Arthur is not strange.
Alexia is not large.Someone being upset is equivalent to being large.
Someone is not chestnut and not cute if and only if he is not funny and not strange.
If there is at least one people who is not cute or upset, then Phineas is not strange.
Phineas being not chestnut or Pierce being not strange implies that Amery is not funny.
Someone who is eithor upset or not funny is always chestnut.
Phineas being not chestnut and Pierce being upset imply that Alexia is not strange.
It can be concluded that Alexia is strange once knowing that Douglas is not large.
If Lauren is not funny, then Pierce is not cute and Pierce is chestnut.
Lauren being not cute and Arthur being not funny imply that Alexia is upset and Phineas is chestnut.
If there is someone who is funny, then Phineas is not upset and Douglas is not strange.
If there is at least one people who is either not strange or chestnut, then Alexia is upset and Arthur is not large.
If someone is not large and chestnut, then he is not cute and not strange. | Amery is chestnut. | entailment |
Phineas is cute.
Pierce is chestnut.
Lauren is cute.
Alexia is upset.
Alexia is strange.
Pierce is not strange.
Pierce is not cute.
Pierce is not funny.
Amery is chestnut.
Lauren is funny.
Arthur is not strange.
Alexia is not large.Someone being upset is equivalent to being large.
Someone is not chestnut and not cute if and only if he is not funny and not strange.
If there is at least one people who is not cute or upset, then Phineas is not strange.
Phineas being not chestnut or Pierce being not strange implies that Amery is not funny.
Someone who is eithor upset or not funny is always chestnut.
Phineas being not chestnut and Pierce being upset imply that Alexia is not strange.
It can be concluded that Alexia is strange once knowing that Douglas is not large.
If Lauren is not funny, then Pierce is not cute and Pierce is chestnut.
Lauren being not cute and Arthur being not funny imply that Alexia is upset and Phineas is chestnut.
If there is someone who is funny, then Phineas is not upset and Douglas is not strange.
If there is at least one people who is either not strange or chestnut, then Alexia is upset and Arthur is not large.
If someone is not large and chestnut, then he is not cute and not strange. | Alexia is not large. | self_contradiction |
Phineas is cute.
Pierce is chestnut.
Lauren is cute.
Alexia is upset.
Alexia is strange.
Pierce is not strange.
Pierce is not cute.
Pierce is not funny.
Amery is chestnut.
Lauren is funny.
Arthur is not strange.
Alexia is not large.Someone being upset is equivalent to being large.
Someone is not chestnut and not cute if and only if he is not funny and not strange.
If there is at least one people who is not cute or upset, then Phineas is not strange.
Phineas being not chestnut or Pierce being not strange implies that Amery is not funny.
Someone who is eithor upset or not funny is always chestnut.
Phineas being not chestnut and Pierce being upset imply that Alexia is not strange.
It can be concluded that Alexia is strange once knowing that Douglas is not large.
If Lauren is not funny, then Pierce is not cute and Pierce is chestnut.
Lauren being not cute and Arthur being not funny imply that Alexia is upset and Phineas is chestnut.
If there is someone who is funny, then Phineas is not upset and Douglas is not strange.
If there is at least one people who is either not strange or chestnut, then Alexia is upset and Arthur is not large.
If someone is not large and chestnut, then he is not cute and not strange. | Arthur is not chestnut. | neutral |
Phineas is cute.
Pierce is chestnut.
Lauren is cute.
Alexia is upset.
Alexia is strange.
Pierce is not strange.
Pierce is not cute.
Pierce is not funny.
Amery is chestnut.
Lauren is funny.
Arthur is not strange.
Alexia is not large.Someone being upset is equivalent to being large.
Someone is not chestnut and not cute if and only if he is not funny and not strange.
If there is at least one people who is not cute or upset, then Phineas is not strange.
Phineas being not chestnut or Pierce being not strange implies that Amery is not funny.
Someone who is eithor upset or not funny is always chestnut.
Phineas being not chestnut and Pierce being upset imply that Alexia is not strange.
It can be concluded that Alexia is strange once knowing that Douglas is not large.
If Lauren is not funny, then Pierce is not cute and Pierce is chestnut.
Lauren being not cute and Arthur being not funny imply that Alexia is upset and Phineas is chestnut.
If there is someone who is funny, then Phineas is not upset and Douglas is not strange.
If there is at least one people who is either not strange or chestnut, then Alexia is upset and Arthur is not large.
If someone is not large and chestnut, then he is not cute and not strange. | Pierce is funny. | contradiction |
Phineas is cute.
Pierce is chestnut.
Lauren is cute.
Alexia is upset.
Alexia is strange.
Pierce is not strange.
Pierce is not cute.
Pierce is not funny.
Amery is chestnut.
Lauren is funny.
Arthur is not strange.
Alexia is not large.Someone being upset is equivalent to being large.
Someone is not chestnut and not cute if and only if he is not funny and not strange.
If there is at least one people who is not cute or upset, then Phineas is not strange.
Phineas being not chestnut or Pierce being not strange implies that Amery is not funny.
Someone who is eithor upset or not funny is always chestnut.
Phineas being not chestnut and Pierce being upset imply that Alexia is not strange.
It can be concluded that Alexia is strange once knowing that Douglas is not large.
If Lauren is not funny, then Pierce is not cute and Pierce is chestnut.
Lauren being not cute and Arthur being not funny imply that Alexia is upset and Phineas is chestnut.
If there is someone who is funny, then Phineas is not upset and Douglas is not strange.
If there is at least one people who is either not strange or chestnut, then Alexia is upset and Arthur is not large.
If someone is not large and chestnut, then he is not cute and not strange. | Amery is strange. | neutral |
Phineas is cute.
Pierce is chestnut.
Lauren is cute.
Alexia is upset.
Alexia is strange.
Pierce is not strange.
Pierce is not cute.
Pierce is not funny.
Amery is chestnut.
Lauren is funny.
Arthur is not strange.
Alexia is not large.Someone being upset is equivalent to being large.
Someone is not chestnut and not cute if and only if he is not funny and not strange.
If there is at least one people who is not cute or upset, then Phineas is not strange.
Phineas being not chestnut or Pierce being not strange implies that Amery is not funny.
Someone who is eithor upset or not funny is always chestnut.
Phineas being not chestnut and Pierce being upset imply that Alexia is not strange.
It can be concluded that Alexia is strange once knowing that Douglas is not large.
If Lauren is not funny, then Pierce is not cute and Pierce is chestnut.
Lauren being not cute and Arthur being not funny imply that Alexia is upset and Phineas is chestnut.
If there is someone who is funny, then Phineas is not upset and Douglas is not strange.
If there is at least one people who is either not strange or chestnut, then Alexia is upset and Arthur is not large.
If someone is not large and chestnut, then he is not cute and not strange. | Lauren is not large. | neutral |
Phineas is cute.
Pierce is chestnut.
Lauren is cute.
Alexia is upset.
Alexia is strange.
Pierce is not strange.
Pierce is not cute.
Pierce is not funny.
Amery is chestnut.
Lauren is funny.
Arthur is not strange.
Alexia is not large.Someone being upset is equivalent to being large.
Someone is not chestnut and not cute if and only if he is not funny and not strange.
If there is at least one people who is not cute or upset, then Phineas is not strange.
Phineas being not chestnut or Pierce being not strange implies that Amery is not funny.
Someone who is eithor upset or not funny is always chestnut.
Phineas being not chestnut and Pierce being upset imply that Alexia is not strange.
It can be concluded that Alexia is strange once knowing that Douglas is not large.
If Lauren is not funny, then Pierce is not cute and Pierce is chestnut.
Lauren being not cute and Arthur being not funny imply that Alexia is upset and Phineas is chestnut.
If there is someone who is funny, then Phineas is not upset and Douglas is not strange.
If there is at least one people who is either not strange or chestnut, then Alexia is upset and Arthur is not large.
If someone is not large and chestnut, then he is not cute and not strange. | Pierce is chestnut. | self_contradiction |
Phineas is cute.
Pierce is chestnut.
Lauren is cute.
Alexia is upset.
Alexia is strange.
Pierce is not strange.
Pierce is not cute.
Pierce is not funny.
Amery is chestnut.
Lauren is funny.
Arthur is not strange.
Alexia is not large.Someone being upset is equivalent to being large.
Someone is not chestnut and not cute if and only if he is not funny and not strange.
If there is at least one people who is not cute or upset, then Phineas is not strange.
Phineas being not chestnut or Pierce being not strange implies that Amery is not funny.
Someone who is eithor upset or not funny is always chestnut.
Phineas being not chestnut and Pierce being upset imply that Alexia is not strange.
It can be concluded that Alexia is strange once knowing that Douglas is not large.
If Lauren is not funny, then Pierce is not cute and Pierce is chestnut.
Lauren being not cute and Arthur being not funny imply that Alexia is upset and Phineas is chestnut.
If there is someone who is funny, then Phineas is not upset and Douglas is not strange.
If there is at least one people who is either not strange or chestnut, then Alexia is upset and Arthur is not large.
If someone is not large and chestnut, then he is not cute and not strange. | Alexia is large. | self_contradiction |
Phineas is cute.
Pierce is chestnut.
Lauren is cute.
Alexia is upset.
Alexia is strange.
Pierce is not strange.
Pierce is not cute.
Pierce is not funny.
Amery is chestnut.
Lauren is funny.
Arthur is not strange.
Alexia is not large.Someone being upset is equivalent to being large.
Someone is not chestnut and not cute if and only if he is not funny and not strange.
If there is at least one people who is not cute or upset, then Phineas is not strange.
Phineas being not chestnut or Pierce being not strange implies that Amery is not funny.
Someone who is eithor upset or not funny is always chestnut.
Phineas being not chestnut and Pierce being upset imply that Alexia is not strange.
It can be concluded that Alexia is strange once knowing that Douglas is not large.
If Lauren is not funny, then Pierce is not cute and Pierce is chestnut.
Lauren being not cute and Arthur being not funny imply that Alexia is upset and Phineas is chestnut.
If there is someone who is funny, then Phineas is not upset and Douglas is not strange.
If there is at least one people who is either not strange or chestnut, then Alexia is upset and Arthur is not large.
If someone is not large and chestnut, then he is not cute and not strange. | Pierce is not chestnut. | self_contradiction |
Mila is federal.
Bond is neat.
Michael is not federal.
Cedric is not brown.
Luna is federal.
Barclay is not ugly.
Luna is not ugly.
Marshall is federal.
Bond is gentle.
Michael is not joyous.
Luna is not brown.
Mila is not ugly.Marshall being not gentle implies that Mila is ugly and Barclay is not federal.
Barclay being ugly implies that Michael is gentle.
Someone being both not gentle and brown is equivalent to being not federal.
Barclay being neat and Cedric being not brown imply that Marshall is ugly.
Someone who is eithor not federal or not joyous is always not ugly.
Barclay is not joyous if and only if Barclay is not neat.
If there is someone who is both not joyous and federal, then Bond is not ugly.
Bond being not joyous is equivalent to Bond being federal and Michael being not gentle.
Someone being not ugly is equivalent to being brown.
If Michael is not neat and Barclay is not federal, then Michael is not brown.
If someone is ugly and not joyous, then he is federal, and vice versa.
Someone who is federal is always both gentle and not brown. | Luna is brown. | self_contradiction |
Mila is federal.
Bond is neat.
Michael is not federal.
Cedric is not brown.
Luna is federal.
Barclay is not ugly.
Luna is not ugly.
Marshall is federal.
Bond is gentle.
Michael is not joyous.
Luna is not brown.
Mila is not ugly.Marshall being not gentle implies that Mila is ugly and Barclay is not federal.
Barclay being ugly implies that Michael is gentle.
Someone being both not gentle and brown is equivalent to being not federal.
Barclay being neat and Cedric being not brown imply that Marshall is ugly.
Someone who is eithor not federal or not joyous is always not ugly.
Barclay is not joyous if and only if Barclay is not neat.
If there is someone who is both not joyous and federal, then Bond is not ugly.
Bond being not joyous is equivalent to Bond being federal and Michael being not gentle.
Someone being not ugly is equivalent to being brown.
If Michael is not neat and Barclay is not federal, then Michael is not brown.
If someone is ugly and not joyous, then he is federal, and vice versa.
Someone who is federal is always both gentle and not brown. | Bond is not joyous. | neutral |
Mila is federal.
Bond is neat.
Michael is not federal.
Cedric is not brown.
Luna is federal.
Barclay is not ugly.
Luna is not ugly.
Marshall is federal.
Bond is gentle.
Michael is not joyous.
Luna is not brown.
Mila is not ugly.Marshall being not gentle implies that Mila is ugly and Barclay is not federal.
Barclay being ugly implies that Michael is gentle.
Someone being both not gentle and brown is equivalent to being not federal.
Barclay being neat and Cedric being not brown imply that Marshall is ugly.
Someone who is eithor not federal or not joyous is always not ugly.
Barclay is not joyous if and only if Barclay is not neat.
If there is someone who is both not joyous and federal, then Bond is not ugly.
Bond being not joyous is equivalent to Bond being federal and Michael being not gentle.
Someone being not ugly is equivalent to being brown.
If Michael is not neat and Barclay is not federal, then Michael is not brown.
If someone is ugly and not joyous, then he is federal, and vice versa.
Someone who is federal is always both gentle and not brown. | Barclay is not neat. | neutral |
Mila is federal.
Bond is neat.
Michael is not federal.
Cedric is not brown.
Luna is federal.
Barclay is not ugly.
Luna is not ugly.
Marshall is federal.
Bond is gentle.
Michael is not joyous.
Luna is not brown.
Mila is not ugly.Marshall being not gentle implies that Mila is ugly and Barclay is not federal.
Barclay being ugly implies that Michael is gentle.
Someone being both not gentle and brown is equivalent to being not federal.
Barclay being neat and Cedric being not brown imply that Marshall is ugly.
Someone who is eithor not federal or not joyous is always not ugly.
Barclay is not joyous if and only if Barclay is not neat.
If there is someone who is both not joyous and federal, then Bond is not ugly.
Bond being not joyous is equivalent to Bond being federal and Michael being not gentle.
Someone being not ugly is equivalent to being brown.
If Michael is not neat and Barclay is not federal, then Michael is not brown.
If someone is ugly and not joyous, then he is federal, and vice versa.
Someone who is federal is always both gentle and not brown. | Michael is not ugly. | entailment |
Mila is federal.
Bond is neat.
Michael is not federal.
Cedric is not brown.
Luna is federal.
Barclay is not ugly.
Luna is not ugly.
Marshall is federal.
Bond is gentle.
Michael is not joyous.
Luna is not brown.
Mila is not ugly.Marshall being not gentle implies that Mila is ugly and Barclay is not federal.
Barclay being ugly implies that Michael is gentle.
Someone being both not gentle and brown is equivalent to being not federal.
Barclay being neat and Cedric being not brown imply that Marshall is ugly.
Someone who is eithor not federal or not joyous is always not ugly.
Barclay is not joyous if and only if Barclay is not neat.
If there is someone who is both not joyous and federal, then Bond is not ugly.
Bond being not joyous is equivalent to Bond being federal and Michael being not gentle.
Someone being not ugly is equivalent to being brown.
If Michael is not neat and Barclay is not federal, then Michael is not brown.
If someone is ugly and not joyous, then he is federal, and vice versa.
Someone who is federal is always both gentle and not brown. | Marshall is not federal. | contradiction |
Mila is federal.
Bond is neat.
Michael is not federal.
Cedric is not brown.
Luna is federal.
Barclay is not ugly.
Luna is not ugly.
Marshall is federal.
Bond is gentle.
Michael is not joyous.
Luna is not brown.
Mila is not ugly.Marshall being not gentle implies that Mila is ugly and Barclay is not federal.
Barclay being ugly implies that Michael is gentle.
Someone being both not gentle and brown is equivalent to being not federal.
Barclay being neat and Cedric being not brown imply that Marshall is ugly.
Someone who is eithor not federal or not joyous is always not ugly.
Barclay is not joyous if and only if Barclay is not neat.
If there is someone who is both not joyous and federal, then Bond is not ugly.
Bond being not joyous is equivalent to Bond being federal and Michael being not gentle.
Someone being not ugly is equivalent to being brown.
If Michael is not neat and Barclay is not federal, then Michael is not brown.
If someone is ugly and not joyous, then he is federal, and vice versa.
Someone who is federal is always both gentle and not brown. | Luna is not joyous. | entailment |
Mila is federal.
Bond is neat.
Michael is not federal.
Cedric is not brown.
Luna is federal.
Barclay is not ugly.
Luna is not ugly.
Marshall is federal.
Bond is gentle.
Michael is not joyous.
Luna is not brown.
Mila is not ugly.Marshall being not gentle implies that Mila is ugly and Barclay is not federal.
Barclay being ugly implies that Michael is gentle.
Someone being both not gentle and brown is equivalent to being not federal.
Barclay being neat and Cedric being not brown imply that Marshall is ugly.
Someone who is eithor not federal or not joyous is always not ugly.
Barclay is not joyous if and only if Barclay is not neat.
If there is someone who is both not joyous and federal, then Bond is not ugly.
Bond being not joyous is equivalent to Bond being federal and Michael being not gentle.
Someone being not ugly is equivalent to being brown.
If Michael is not neat and Barclay is not federal, then Michael is not brown.
If someone is ugly and not joyous, then he is federal, and vice versa.
Someone who is federal is always both gentle and not brown. | Michael is federal. | contradiction |
Mila is federal.
Bond is neat.
Michael is not federal.
Cedric is not brown.
Luna is federal.
Barclay is not ugly.
Luna is not ugly.
Marshall is federal.
Bond is gentle.
Michael is not joyous.
Luna is not brown.
Mila is not ugly.Marshall being not gentle implies that Mila is ugly and Barclay is not federal.
Barclay being ugly implies that Michael is gentle.
Someone being both not gentle and brown is equivalent to being not federal.
Barclay being neat and Cedric being not brown imply that Marshall is ugly.
Someone who is eithor not federal or not joyous is always not ugly.
Barclay is not joyous if and only if Barclay is not neat.
If there is someone who is both not joyous and federal, then Bond is not ugly.
Bond being not joyous is equivalent to Bond being federal and Michael being not gentle.
Someone being not ugly is equivalent to being brown.
If Michael is not neat and Barclay is not federal, then Michael is not brown.
If someone is ugly and not joyous, then he is federal, and vice versa.
Someone who is federal is always both gentle and not brown. | Marshall is joyous. | contradiction |
Mila is federal.
Bond is neat.
Michael is not federal.
Cedric is not brown.
Luna is federal.
Barclay is not ugly.
Luna is not ugly.
Marshall is federal.
Bond is gentle.
Michael is not joyous.
Luna is not brown.
Mila is not ugly.Marshall being not gentle implies that Mila is ugly and Barclay is not federal.
Barclay being ugly implies that Michael is gentle.
Someone being both not gentle and brown is equivalent to being not federal.
Barclay being neat and Cedric being not brown imply that Marshall is ugly.
Someone who is eithor not federal or not joyous is always not ugly.
Barclay is not joyous if and only if Barclay is not neat.
If there is someone who is both not joyous and federal, then Bond is not ugly.
Bond being not joyous is equivalent to Bond being federal and Michael being not gentle.
Someone being not ugly is equivalent to being brown.
If Michael is not neat and Barclay is not federal, then Michael is not brown.
If someone is ugly and not joyous, then he is federal, and vice versa.
Someone who is federal is always both gentle and not brown. | Mila is ugly. | self_contradiction |
Mila is federal.
Bond is neat.
Michael is not federal.
Cedric is not brown.
Luna is federal.
Barclay is not ugly.
Luna is not ugly.
Marshall is federal.
Bond is gentle.
Michael is not joyous.
Luna is not brown.
Mila is not ugly.Marshall being not gentle implies that Mila is ugly and Barclay is not federal.
Barclay being ugly implies that Michael is gentle.
Someone being both not gentle and brown is equivalent to being not federal.
Barclay being neat and Cedric being not brown imply that Marshall is ugly.
Someone who is eithor not federal or not joyous is always not ugly.
Barclay is not joyous if and only if Barclay is not neat.
If there is someone who is both not joyous and federal, then Bond is not ugly.
Bond being not joyous is equivalent to Bond being federal and Michael being not gentle.
Someone being not ugly is equivalent to being brown.
If Michael is not neat and Barclay is not federal, then Michael is not brown.
If someone is ugly and not joyous, then he is federal, and vice versa.
Someone who is federal is always both gentle and not brown. | Michael is ugly. | contradiction |
Mila is federal.
Bond is neat.
Michael is not federal.
Cedric is not brown.
Luna is federal.
Barclay is not ugly.
Luna is not ugly.
Marshall is federal.
Bond is gentle.
Michael is not joyous.
Luna is not brown.
Mila is not ugly.Marshall being not gentle implies that Mila is ugly and Barclay is not federal.
Barclay being ugly implies that Michael is gentle.
Someone being both not gentle and brown is equivalent to being not federal.
Barclay being neat and Cedric being not brown imply that Marshall is ugly.
Someone who is eithor not federal or not joyous is always not ugly.
Barclay is not joyous if and only if Barclay is not neat.
If there is someone who is both not joyous and federal, then Bond is not ugly.
Bond being not joyous is equivalent to Bond being federal and Michael being not gentle.
Someone being not ugly is equivalent to being brown.
If Michael is not neat and Barclay is not federal, then Michael is not brown.
If someone is ugly and not joyous, then he is federal, and vice versa.
Someone who is federal is always both gentle and not brown. | Marshall is not ugly. | self_contradiction |
Mila is federal.
Bond is neat.
Michael is not federal.
Cedric is not brown.
Luna is federal.
Barclay is not ugly.
Luna is not ugly.
Marshall is federal.
Bond is gentle.
Michael is not joyous.
Luna is not brown.
Mila is not ugly.Marshall being not gentle implies that Mila is ugly and Barclay is not federal.
Barclay being ugly implies that Michael is gentle.
Someone being both not gentle and brown is equivalent to being not federal.
Barclay being neat and Cedric being not brown imply that Marshall is ugly.
Someone who is eithor not federal or not joyous is always not ugly.
Barclay is not joyous if and only if Barclay is not neat.
If there is someone who is both not joyous and federal, then Bond is not ugly.
Bond being not joyous is equivalent to Bond being federal and Michael being not gentle.
Someone being not ugly is equivalent to being brown.
If Michael is not neat and Barclay is not federal, then Michael is not brown.
If someone is ugly and not joyous, then he is federal, and vice versa.
Someone who is federal is always both gentle and not brown. | Mila is federal. | entailment |
Mila is federal.
Bond is neat.
Michael is not federal.
Cedric is not brown.
Luna is federal.
Barclay is not ugly.
Luna is not ugly.
Marshall is federal.
Bond is gentle.
Michael is not joyous.
Luna is not brown.
Mila is not ugly.Marshall being not gentle implies that Mila is ugly and Barclay is not federal.
Barclay being ugly implies that Michael is gentle.
Someone being both not gentle and brown is equivalent to being not federal.
Barclay being neat and Cedric being not brown imply that Marshall is ugly.
Someone who is eithor not federal or not joyous is always not ugly.
Barclay is not joyous if and only if Barclay is not neat.
If there is someone who is both not joyous and federal, then Bond is not ugly.
Bond being not joyous is equivalent to Bond being federal and Michael being not gentle.
Someone being not ugly is equivalent to being brown.
If Michael is not neat and Barclay is not federal, then Michael is not brown.
If someone is ugly and not joyous, then he is federal, and vice versa.
Someone who is federal is always both gentle and not brown. | Michael is not gentle. | entailment |
Mila is federal.
Bond is neat.
Michael is not federal.
Cedric is not brown.
Luna is federal.
Barclay is not ugly.
Luna is not ugly.
Marshall is federal.
Bond is gentle.
Michael is not joyous.
Luna is not brown.
Mila is not ugly.Marshall being not gentle implies that Mila is ugly and Barclay is not federal.
Barclay being ugly implies that Michael is gentle.
Someone being both not gentle and brown is equivalent to being not federal.
Barclay being neat and Cedric being not brown imply that Marshall is ugly.
Someone who is eithor not federal or not joyous is always not ugly.
Barclay is not joyous if and only if Barclay is not neat.
If there is someone who is both not joyous and federal, then Bond is not ugly.
Bond being not joyous is equivalent to Bond being federal and Michael being not gentle.
Someone being not ugly is equivalent to being brown.
If Michael is not neat and Barclay is not federal, then Michael is not brown.
If someone is ugly and not joyous, then he is federal, and vice versa.
Someone who is federal is always both gentle and not brown. | Michael is not joyous. | entailment |
Mila is federal.
Bond is neat.
Michael is not federal.
Cedric is not brown.
Luna is federal.
Barclay is not ugly.
Luna is not ugly.
Marshall is federal.
Bond is gentle.
Michael is not joyous.
Luna is not brown.
Mila is not ugly.Marshall being not gentle implies that Mila is ugly and Barclay is not federal.
Barclay being ugly implies that Michael is gentle.
Someone being both not gentle and brown is equivalent to being not federal.
Barclay being neat and Cedric being not brown imply that Marshall is ugly.
Someone who is eithor not federal or not joyous is always not ugly.
Barclay is not joyous if and only if Barclay is not neat.
If there is someone who is both not joyous and federal, then Bond is not ugly.
Bond being not joyous is equivalent to Bond being federal and Michael being not gentle.
Someone being not ugly is equivalent to being brown.
If Michael is not neat and Barclay is not federal, then Michael is not brown.
If someone is ugly and not joyous, then he is federal, and vice versa.
Someone who is federal is always both gentle and not brown. | Marshall is not neat. | neutral |
Mila is federal.
Bond is neat.
Michael is not federal.
Cedric is not brown.
Luna is federal.
Barclay is not ugly.
Luna is not ugly.
Marshall is federal.
Bond is gentle.
Michael is not joyous.
Luna is not brown.
Mila is not ugly.Marshall being not gentle implies that Mila is ugly and Barclay is not federal.
Barclay being ugly implies that Michael is gentle.
Someone being both not gentle and brown is equivalent to being not federal.
Barclay being neat and Cedric being not brown imply that Marshall is ugly.
Someone who is eithor not federal or not joyous is always not ugly.
Barclay is not joyous if and only if Barclay is not neat.
If there is someone who is both not joyous and federal, then Bond is not ugly.
Bond being not joyous is equivalent to Bond being federal and Michael being not gentle.
Someone being not ugly is equivalent to being brown.
If Michael is not neat and Barclay is not federal, then Michael is not brown.
If someone is ugly and not joyous, then he is federal, and vice versa.
Someone who is federal is always both gentle and not brown. | Marshall is brown. | self_contradiction |
Mila is federal.
Bond is neat.
Michael is not federal.
Cedric is not brown.
Luna is federal.
Barclay is not ugly.
Luna is not ugly.
Marshall is federal.
Bond is gentle.
Michael is not joyous.
Luna is not brown.
Mila is not ugly.Marshall being not gentle implies that Mila is ugly and Barclay is not federal.
Barclay being ugly implies that Michael is gentle.
Someone being both not gentle and brown is equivalent to being not federal.
Barclay being neat and Cedric being not brown imply that Marshall is ugly.
Someone who is eithor not federal or not joyous is always not ugly.
Barclay is not joyous if and only if Barclay is not neat.
If there is someone who is both not joyous and federal, then Bond is not ugly.
Bond being not joyous is equivalent to Bond being federal and Michael being not gentle.
Someone being not ugly is equivalent to being brown.
If Michael is not neat and Barclay is not federal, then Michael is not brown.
If someone is ugly and not joyous, then he is federal, and vice versa.
Someone who is federal is always both gentle and not brown. | Barclay is federal. | neutral |
Mila is federal.
Bond is neat.
Michael is not federal.
Cedric is not brown.
Luna is federal.
Barclay is not ugly.
Luna is not ugly.
Marshall is federal.
Bond is gentle.
Michael is not joyous.
Luna is not brown.
Mila is not ugly.Marshall being not gentle implies that Mila is ugly and Barclay is not federal.
Barclay being ugly implies that Michael is gentle.
Someone being both not gentle and brown is equivalent to being not federal.
Barclay being neat and Cedric being not brown imply that Marshall is ugly.
Someone who is eithor not federal or not joyous is always not ugly.
Barclay is not joyous if and only if Barclay is not neat.
If there is someone who is both not joyous and federal, then Bond is not ugly.
Bond being not joyous is equivalent to Bond being federal and Michael being not gentle.
Someone being not ugly is equivalent to being brown.
If Michael is not neat and Barclay is not federal, then Michael is not brown.
If someone is ugly and not joyous, then he is federal, and vice versa.
Someone who is federal is always both gentle and not brown. | Barclay is not brown. | contradiction |
Mila is federal.
Bond is neat.
Michael is not federal.
Cedric is not brown.
Luna is federal.
Barclay is not ugly.
Luna is not ugly.
Marshall is federal.
Bond is gentle.
Michael is not joyous.
Luna is not brown.
Mila is not ugly.Marshall being not gentle implies that Mila is ugly and Barclay is not federal.
Barclay being ugly implies that Michael is gentle.
Someone being both not gentle and brown is equivalent to being not federal.
Barclay being neat and Cedric being not brown imply that Marshall is ugly.
Someone who is eithor not federal or not joyous is always not ugly.
Barclay is not joyous if and only if Barclay is not neat.
If there is someone who is both not joyous and federal, then Bond is not ugly.
Bond being not joyous is equivalent to Bond being federal and Michael being not gentle.
Someone being not ugly is equivalent to being brown.
If Michael is not neat and Barclay is not federal, then Michael is not brown.
If someone is ugly and not joyous, then he is federal, and vice versa.
Someone who is federal is always both gentle and not brown. | Cedric is not neat. | neutral |
Mila is federal.
Bond is neat.
Michael is not federal.
Cedric is not brown.
Luna is federal.
Barclay is not ugly.
Luna is not ugly.
Marshall is federal.
Bond is gentle.
Michael is not joyous.
Luna is not brown.
Mila is not ugly.Marshall being not gentle implies that Mila is ugly and Barclay is not federal.
Barclay being ugly implies that Michael is gentle.
Someone being both not gentle and brown is equivalent to being not federal.
Barclay being neat and Cedric being not brown imply that Marshall is ugly.
Someone who is eithor not federal or not joyous is always not ugly.
Barclay is not joyous if and only if Barclay is not neat.
If there is someone who is both not joyous and federal, then Bond is not ugly.
Bond being not joyous is equivalent to Bond being federal and Michael being not gentle.
Someone being not ugly is equivalent to being brown.
If Michael is not neat and Barclay is not federal, then Michael is not brown.
If someone is ugly and not joyous, then he is federal, and vice versa.
Someone who is federal is always both gentle and not brown. | Luna is not ugly. | self_contradiction |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.