premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Nathalie is ugly.
Brian is not popular.
Gemma is round.
Kendrick is not popular.
Gemma is ugly.
Gemma is excited.
Casper is not excited.
Hector is not ugly.
Brian is not dangerous.
Gemma is popular.
Aldis is not popular.
Hector is round.If Kendrick is popular or Brian is excited, then Kendrick is dangerous.
If everyone is dangerous or not grotesque, then Nathalie is round.
Someone is not dangerous and not grotesque if and only if he is excited.
If someone is both ugly and round, then he is dangerous.
Someone who is not dangerous is always both round and grotesque.
If Hector is not popular, then Hector is not excited.
Someone is round and not grotesque if and only if he is not ugly.
If Gemma is not dangerous, then Aldis is ugly and Brian is not excited.
Nathalie being not grotesque and Kendrick being not excited imply that Gemma is popular.
Someone who is ugly is always popular.
As long as someone is not ugly, he is dangerous and popular.
If there is at least one people who is both excited and not ugly, then Casper is not round. | Gemma is round. | entailment |
Nathalie is ugly.
Brian is not popular.
Gemma is round.
Kendrick is not popular.
Gemma is ugly.
Gemma is excited.
Casper is not excited.
Hector is not ugly.
Brian is not dangerous.
Gemma is popular.
Aldis is not popular.
Hector is round.If Kendrick is popular or Brian is excited, then Kendrick is dangerous.
If everyone is dangerous or not grotesque, then Nathalie is round.
Someone is not dangerous and not grotesque if and only if he is excited.
If someone is both ugly and round, then he is dangerous.
Someone who is not dangerous is always both round and grotesque.
If Hector is not popular, then Hector is not excited.
Someone is round and not grotesque if and only if he is not ugly.
If Gemma is not dangerous, then Aldis is ugly and Brian is not excited.
Nathalie being not grotesque and Kendrick being not excited imply that Gemma is popular.
Someone who is ugly is always popular.
As long as someone is not ugly, he is dangerous and popular.
If there is at least one people who is both excited and not ugly, then Casper is not round. | Gemma is not round. | contradiction |
Nathalie is ugly.
Brian is not popular.
Gemma is round.
Kendrick is not popular.
Gemma is ugly.
Gemma is excited.
Casper is not excited.
Hector is not ugly.
Brian is not dangerous.
Gemma is popular.
Aldis is not popular.
Hector is round.If Kendrick is popular or Brian is excited, then Kendrick is dangerous.
If everyone is dangerous or not grotesque, then Nathalie is round.
Someone is not dangerous and not grotesque if and only if he is excited.
If someone is both ugly and round, then he is dangerous.
Someone who is not dangerous is always both round and grotesque.
If Hector is not popular, then Hector is not excited.
Someone is round and not grotesque if and only if he is not ugly.
If Gemma is not dangerous, then Aldis is ugly and Brian is not excited.
Nathalie being not grotesque and Kendrick being not excited imply that Gemma is popular.
Someone who is ugly is always popular.
As long as someone is not ugly, he is dangerous and popular.
If there is at least one people who is both excited and not ugly, then Casper is not round. | Aldis is not popular. | self_contradiction |
Nathalie is ugly.
Brian is not popular.
Gemma is round.
Kendrick is not popular.
Gemma is ugly.
Gemma is excited.
Casper is not excited.
Hector is not ugly.
Brian is not dangerous.
Gemma is popular.
Aldis is not popular.
Hector is round.If Kendrick is popular or Brian is excited, then Kendrick is dangerous.
If everyone is dangerous or not grotesque, then Nathalie is round.
Someone is not dangerous and not grotesque if and only if he is excited.
If someone is both ugly and round, then he is dangerous.
Someone who is not dangerous is always both round and grotesque.
If Hector is not popular, then Hector is not excited.
Someone is round and not grotesque if and only if he is not ugly.
If Gemma is not dangerous, then Aldis is ugly and Brian is not excited.
Nathalie being not grotesque and Kendrick being not excited imply that Gemma is popular.
Someone who is ugly is always popular.
As long as someone is not ugly, he is dangerous and popular.
If there is at least one people who is both excited and not ugly, then Casper is not round. | Kendrick is not popular. | entailment |
Nathalie is ugly.
Brian is not popular.
Gemma is round.
Kendrick is not popular.
Gemma is ugly.
Gemma is excited.
Casper is not excited.
Hector is not ugly.
Brian is not dangerous.
Gemma is popular.
Aldis is not popular.
Hector is round.If Kendrick is popular or Brian is excited, then Kendrick is dangerous.
If everyone is dangerous or not grotesque, then Nathalie is round.
Someone is not dangerous and not grotesque if and only if he is excited.
If someone is both ugly and round, then he is dangerous.
Someone who is not dangerous is always both round and grotesque.
If Hector is not popular, then Hector is not excited.
Someone is round and not grotesque if and only if he is not ugly.
If Gemma is not dangerous, then Aldis is ugly and Brian is not excited.
Nathalie being not grotesque and Kendrick being not excited imply that Gemma is popular.
Someone who is ugly is always popular.
As long as someone is not ugly, he is dangerous and popular.
If there is at least one people who is both excited and not ugly, then Casper is not round. | Kendrick is not round. | neutral |
Nathalie is ugly.
Brian is not popular.
Gemma is round.
Kendrick is not popular.
Gemma is ugly.
Gemma is excited.
Casper is not excited.
Hector is not ugly.
Brian is not dangerous.
Gemma is popular.
Aldis is not popular.
Hector is round.If Kendrick is popular or Brian is excited, then Kendrick is dangerous.
If everyone is dangerous or not grotesque, then Nathalie is round.
Someone is not dangerous and not grotesque if and only if he is excited.
If someone is both ugly and round, then he is dangerous.
Someone who is not dangerous is always both round and grotesque.
If Hector is not popular, then Hector is not excited.
Someone is round and not grotesque if and only if he is not ugly.
If Gemma is not dangerous, then Aldis is ugly and Brian is not excited.
Nathalie being not grotesque and Kendrick being not excited imply that Gemma is popular.
Someone who is ugly is always popular.
As long as someone is not ugly, he is dangerous and popular.
If there is at least one people who is both excited and not ugly, then Casper is not round. | Casper is excited. | contradiction |
Nathalie is ugly.
Brian is not popular.
Gemma is round.
Kendrick is not popular.
Gemma is ugly.
Gemma is excited.
Casper is not excited.
Hector is not ugly.
Brian is not dangerous.
Gemma is popular.
Aldis is not popular.
Hector is round.If Kendrick is popular or Brian is excited, then Kendrick is dangerous.
If everyone is dangerous or not grotesque, then Nathalie is round.
Someone is not dangerous and not grotesque if and only if he is excited.
If someone is both ugly and round, then he is dangerous.
Someone who is not dangerous is always both round and grotesque.
If Hector is not popular, then Hector is not excited.
Someone is round and not grotesque if and only if he is not ugly.
If Gemma is not dangerous, then Aldis is ugly and Brian is not excited.
Nathalie being not grotesque and Kendrick being not excited imply that Gemma is popular.
Someone who is ugly is always popular.
As long as someone is not ugly, he is dangerous and popular.
If there is at least one people who is both excited and not ugly, then Casper is not round. | Aldis is dangerous. | neutral |
Nathalie is ugly.
Brian is not popular.
Gemma is round.
Kendrick is not popular.
Gemma is ugly.
Gemma is excited.
Casper is not excited.
Hector is not ugly.
Brian is not dangerous.
Gemma is popular.
Aldis is not popular.
Hector is round.If Kendrick is popular or Brian is excited, then Kendrick is dangerous.
If everyone is dangerous or not grotesque, then Nathalie is round.
Someone is not dangerous and not grotesque if and only if he is excited.
If someone is both ugly and round, then he is dangerous.
Someone who is not dangerous is always both round and grotesque.
If Hector is not popular, then Hector is not excited.
Someone is round and not grotesque if and only if he is not ugly.
If Gemma is not dangerous, then Aldis is ugly and Brian is not excited.
Nathalie being not grotesque and Kendrick being not excited imply that Gemma is popular.
Someone who is ugly is always popular.
As long as someone is not ugly, he is dangerous and popular.
If there is at least one people who is both excited and not ugly, then Casper is not round. | Aldis is ugly. | entailment |
Nathalie is ugly.
Brian is not popular.
Gemma is round.
Kendrick is not popular.
Gemma is ugly.
Gemma is excited.
Casper is not excited.
Hector is not ugly.
Brian is not dangerous.
Gemma is popular.
Aldis is not popular.
Hector is round.If Kendrick is popular or Brian is excited, then Kendrick is dangerous.
If everyone is dangerous or not grotesque, then Nathalie is round.
Someone is not dangerous and not grotesque if and only if he is excited.
If someone is both ugly and round, then he is dangerous.
Someone who is not dangerous is always both round and grotesque.
If Hector is not popular, then Hector is not excited.
Someone is round and not grotesque if and only if he is not ugly.
If Gemma is not dangerous, then Aldis is ugly and Brian is not excited.
Nathalie being not grotesque and Kendrick being not excited imply that Gemma is popular.
Someone who is ugly is always popular.
As long as someone is not ugly, he is dangerous and popular.
If there is at least one people who is both excited and not ugly, then Casper is not round. | Brian is not ugly. | neutral |
Nathalie is ugly.
Brian is not popular.
Gemma is round.
Kendrick is not popular.
Gemma is ugly.
Gemma is excited.
Casper is not excited.
Hector is not ugly.
Brian is not dangerous.
Gemma is popular.
Aldis is not popular.
Hector is round.If Kendrick is popular or Brian is excited, then Kendrick is dangerous.
If everyone is dangerous or not grotesque, then Nathalie is round.
Someone is not dangerous and not grotesque if and only if he is excited.
If someone is both ugly and round, then he is dangerous.
Someone who is not dangerous is always both round and grotesque.
If Hector is not popular, then Hector is not excited.
Someone is round and not grotesque if and only if he is not ugly.
If Gemma is not dangerous, then Aldis is ugly and Brian is not excited.
Nathalie being not grotesque and Kendrick being not excited imply that Gemma is popular.
Someone who is ugly is always popular.
As long as someone is not ugly, he is dangerous and popular.
If there is at least one people who is both excited and not ugly, then Casper is not round. | Gemma is dangerous. | self_contradiction |
Nathalie is ugly.
Brian is not popular.
Gemma is round.
Kendrick is not popular.
Gemma is ugly.
Gemma is excited.
Casper is not excited.
Hector is not ugly.
Brian is not dangerous.
Gemma is popular.
Aldis is not popular.
Hector is round.If Kendrick is popular or Brian is excited, then Kendrick is dangerous.
If everyone is dangerous or not grotesque, then Nathalie is round.
Someone is not dangerous and not grotesque if and only if he is excited.
If someone is both ugly and round, then he is dangerous.
Someone who is not dangerous is always both round and grotesque.
If Hector is not popular, then Hector is not excited.
Someone is round and not grotesque if and only if he is not ugly.
If Gemma is not dangerous, then Aldis is ugly and Brian is not excited.
Nathalie being not grotesque and Kendrick being not excited imply that Gemma is popular.
Someone who is ugly is always popular.
As long as someone is not ugly, he is dangerous and popular.
If there is at least one people who is both excited and not ugly, then Casper is not round. | Hector is ugly. | contradiction |
Nathalie is ugly.
Brian is not popular.
Gemma is round.
Kendrick is not popular.
Gemma is ugly.
Gemma is excited.
Casper is not excited.
Hector is not ugly.
Brian is not dangerous.
Gemma is popular.
Aldis is not popular.
Hector is round.If Kendrick is popular or Brian is excited, then Kendrick is dangerous.
If everyone is dangerous or not grotesque, then Nathalie is round.
Someone is not dangerous and not grotesque if and only if he is excited.
If someone is both ugly and round, then he is dangerous.
Someone who is not dangerous is always both round and grotesque.
If Hector is not popular, then Hector is not excited.
Someone is round and not grotesque if and only if he is not ugly.
If Gemma is not dangerous, then Aldis is ugly and Brian is not excited.
Nathalie being not grotesque and Kendrick being not excited imply that Gemma is popular.
Someone who is ugly is always popular.
As long as someone is not ugly, he is dangerous and popular.
If there is at least one people who is both excited and not ugly, then Casper is not round. | Aldis is popular. | self_contradiction |
Nathalie is ugly.
Brian is not popular.
Gemma is round.
Kendrick is not popular.
Gemma is ugly.
Gemma is excited.
Casper is not excited.
Hector is not ugly.
Brian is not dangerous.
Gemma is popular.
Aldis is not popular.
Hector is round.If Kendrick is popular or Brian is excited, then Kendrick is dangerous.
If everyone is dangerous or not grotesque, then Nathalie is round.
Someone is not dangerous and not grotesque if and only if he is excited.
If someone is both ugly and round, then he is dangerous.
Someone who is not dangerous is always both round and grotesque.
If Hector is not popular, then Hector is not excited.
Someone is round and not grotesque if and only if he is not ugly.
If Gemma is not dangerous, then Aldis is ugly and Brian is not excited.
Nathalie being not grotesque and Kendrick being not excited imply that Gemma is popular.
Someone who is ugly is always popular.
As long as someone is not ugly, he is dangerous and popular.
If there is at least one people who is both excited and not ugly, then Casper is not round. | Hector is round. | entailment |
Nathalie is ugly.
Brian is not popular.
Gemma is round.
Kendrick is not popular.
Gemma is ugly.
Gemma is excited.
Casper is not excited.
Hector is not ugly.
Brian is not dangerous.
Gemma is popular.
Aldis is not popular.
Hector is round.If Kendrick is popular or Brian is excited, then Kendrick is dangerous.
If everyone is dangerous or not grotesque, then Nathalie is round.
Someone is not dangerous and not grotesque if and only if he is excited.
If someone is both ugly and round, then he is dangerous.
Someone who is not dangerous is always both round and grotesque.
If Hector is not popular, then Hector is not excited.
Someone is round and not grotesque if and only if he is not ugly.
If Gemma is not dangerous, then Aldis is ugly and Brian is not excited.
Nathalie being not grotesque and Kendrick being not excited imply that Gemma is popular.
Someone who is ugly is always popular.
As long as someone is not ugly, he is dangerous and popular.
If there is at least one people who is both excited and not ugly, then Casper is not round. | Nathalie is not excited. | neutral |
Nathalie is ugly.
Brian is not popular.
Gemma is round.
Kendrick is not popular.
Gemma is ugly.
Gemma is excited.
Casper is not excited.
Hector is not ugly.
Brian is not dangerous.
Gemma is popular.
Aldis is not popular.
Hector is round.If Kendrick is popular or Brian is excited, then Kendrick is dangerous.
If everyone is dangerous or not grotesque, then Nathalie is round.
Someone is not dangerous and not grotesque if and only if he is excited.
If someone is both ugly and round, then he is dangerous.
Someone who is not dangerous is always both round and grotesque.
If Hector is not popular, then Hector is not excited.
Someone is round and not grotesque if and only if he is not ugly.
If Gemma is not dangerous, then Aldis is ugly and Brian is not excited.
Nathalie being not grotesque and Kendrick being not excited imply that Gemma is popular.
Someone who is ugly is always popular.
As long as someone is not ugly, he is dangerous and popular.
If there is at least one people who is both excited and not ugly, then Casper is not round. | Brian is dangerous. | contradiction |
Nathalie is ugly.
Brian is not popular.
Gemma is round.
Kendrick is not popular.
Gemma is ugly.
Gemma is excited.
Casper is not excited.
Hector is not ugly.
Brian is not dangerous.
Gemma is popular.
Aldis is not popular.
Hector is round.If Kendrick is popular or Brian is excited, then Kendrick is dangerous.
If everyone is dangerous or not grotesque, then Nathalie is round.
Someone is not dangerous and not grotesque if and only if he is excited.
If someone is both ugly and round, then he is dangerous.
Someone who is not dangerous is always both round and grotesque.
If Hector is not popular, then Hector is not excited.
Someone is round and not grotesque if and only if he is not ugly.
If Gemma is not dangerous, then Aldis is ugly and Brian is not excited.
Nathalie being not grotesque and Kendrick being not excited imply that Gemma is popular.
Someone who is ugly is always popular.
As long as someone is not ugly, he is dangerous and popular.
If there is at least one people who is both excited and not ugly, then Casper is not round. | Kendrick is popular. | contradiction |
Nathalie is ugly.
Brian is not popular.
Gemma is round.
Kendrick is not popular.
Gemma is ugly.
Gemma is excited.
Casper is not excited.
Hector is not ugly.
Brian is not dangerous.
Gemma is popular.
Aldis is not popular.
Hector is round.If Kendrick is popular or Brian is excited, then Kendrick is dangerous.
If everyone is dangerous or not grotesque, then Nathalie is round.
Someone is not dangerous and not grotesque if and only if he is excited.
If someone is both ugly and round, then he is dangerous.
Someone who is not dangerous is always both round and grotesque.
If Hector is not popular, then Hector is not excited.
Someone is round and not grotesque if and only if he is not ugly.
If Gemma is not dangerous, then Aldis is ugly and Brian is not excited.
Nathalie being not grotesque and Kendrick being not excited imply that Gemma is popular.
Someone who is ugly is always popular.
As long as someone is not ugly, he is dangerous and popular.
If there is at least one people who is both excited and not ugly, then Casper is not round. | Casper is popular. | neutral |
Nathalie is ugly.
Brian is not popular.
Gemma is round.
Kendrick is not popular.
Gemma is ugly.
Gemma is excited.
Casper is not excited.
Hector is not ugly.
Brian is not dangerous.
Gemma is popular.
Aldis is not popular.
Hector is round.If Kendrick is popular or Brian is excited, then Kendrick is dangerous.
If everyone is dangerous or not grotesque, then Nathalie is round.
Someone is not dangerous and not grotesque if and only if he is excited.
If someone is both ugly and round, then he is dangerous.
Someone who is not dangerous is always both round and grotesque.
If Hector is not popular, then Hector is not excited.
Someone is round and not grotesque if and only if he is not ugly.
If Gemma is not dangerous, then Aldis is ugly and Brian is not excited.
Nathalie being not grotesque and Kendrick being not excited imply that Gemma is popular.
Someone who is ugly is always popular.
As long as someone is not ugly, he is dangerous and popular.
If there is at least one people who is both excited and not ugly, then Casper is not round. | Hector is not grotesque. | entailment |
Nathalie is ugly.
Brian is not popular.
Gemma is round.
Kendrick is not popular.
Gemma is ugly.
Gemma is excited.
Casper is not excited.
Hector is not ugly.
Brian is not dangerous.
Gemma is popular.
Aldis is not popular.
Hector is round.If Kendrick is popular or Brian is excited, then Kendrick is dangerous.
If everyone is dangerous or not grotesque, then Nathalie is round.
Someone is not dangerous and not grotesque if and only if he is excited.
If someone is both ugly and round, then he is dangerous.
Someone who is not dangerous is always both round and grotesque.
If Hector is not popular, then Hector is not excited.
Someone is round and not grotesque if and only if he is not ugly.
If Gemma is not dangerous, then Aldis is ugly and Brian is not excited.
Nathalie being not grotesque and Kendrick being not excited imply that Gemma is popular.
Someone who is ugly is always popular.
As long as someone is not ugly, he is dangerous and popular.
If there is at least one people who is both excited and not ugly, then Casper is not round. | Gemma is grotesque. | self_contradiction |
Nathalie is ugly.
Brian is not popular.
Gemma is round.
Kendrick is not popular.
Gemma is ugly.
Gemma is excited.
Casper is not excited.
Hector is not ugly.
Brian is not dangerous.
Gemma is popular.
Aldis is not popular.
Hector is round.If Kendrick is popular or Brian is excited, then Kendrick is dangerous.
If everyone is dangerous or not grotesque, then Nathalie is round.
Someone is not dangerous and not grotesque if and only if he is excited.
If someone is both ugly and round, then he is dangerous.
Someone who is not dangerous is always both round and grotesque.
If Hector is not popular, then Hector is not excited.
Someone is round and not grotesque if and only if he is not ugly.
If Gemma is not dangerous, then Aldis is ugly and Brian is not excited.
Nathalie being not grotesque and Kendrick being not excited imply that Gemma is popular.
Someone who is ugly is always popular.
As long as someone is not ugly, he is dangerous and popular.
If there is at least one people who is both excited and not ugly, then Casper is not round. | Gemma is not grotesque. | self_contradiction |
Johnny is not historical.
Albert is not elderly.
Todd is not unsightly.
Johnny is not elderly.
Johnny is not skinny.
Todd is not cute.
Jerry is not elderly.
Burton is historical.
Albert is not similar.
Johnny is not cute.
Jerry is not unsightly.
Kirby is not unsightly.If there is at least one people who is not similar or skinny, then Burton is not historical.
If there is at least one people who is not unsightly, then Arthur is cute and Jerry is not similar.
If all people are not skinny, then Jerry is not unsightly.
All skinny people are unsightly.
If there is someone who is not unsightly, then Jerry is not cute and Jerry is skinny.
If Arthur is not cute, then Albert is not skinny and Johnny is not historical.
Someone who is both historical and elderly is always not unsightly.
If Todd is similar and Johnny is not historical, then Kirby is unsightly and Burton is elderly.
If Arthur is not similar, then Jerry is not elderly and Johnny is not skinny, and vice versa.
Burton being similar or Johnny being not skinny implies that Arthur is elderly.
Someone being both not unsightly and not historical is equivalent to being similar and not cute.
Someone is skinny and not cute if and only if he is elderly. | Arthur is elderly. | entailment |
Johnny is not historical.
Albert is not elderly.
Todd is not unsightly.
Johnny is not elderly.
Johnny is not skinny.
Todd is not cute.
Jerry is not elderly.
Burton is historical.
Albert is not similar.
Johnny is not cute.
Jerry is not unsightly.
Kirby is not unsightly.If there is at least one people who is not similar or skinny, then Burton is not historical.
If there is at least one people who is not unsightly, then Arthur is cute and Jerry is not similar.
If all people are not skinny, then Jerry is not unsightly.
All skinny people are unsightly.
If there is someone who is not unsightly, then Jerry is not cute and Jerry is skinny.
If Arthur is not cute, then Albert is not skinny and Johnny is not historical.
Someone who is both historical and elderly is always not unsightly.
If Todd is similar and Johnny is not historical, then Kirby is unsightly and Burton is elderly.
If Arthur is not similar, then Jerry is not elderly and Johnny is not skinny, and vice versa.
Burton being similar or Johnny being not skinny implies that Arthur is elderly.
Someone being both not unsightly and not historical is equivalent to being similar and not cute.
Someone is skinny and not cute if and only if he is elderly. | Todd is not unsightly. | entailment |
Johnny is not historical.
Albert is not elderly.
Todd is not unsightly.
Johnny is not elderly.
Johnny is not skinny.
Todd is not cute.
Jerry is not elderly.
Burton is historical.
Albert is not similar.
Johnny is not cute.
Jerry is not unsightly.
Kirby is not unsightly.If there is at least one people who is not similar or skinny, then Burton is not historical.
If there is at least one people who is not unsightly, then Arthur is cute and Jerry is not similar.
If all people are not skinny, then Jerry is not unsightly.
All skinny people are unsightly.
If there is someone who is not unsightly, then Jerry is not cute and Jerry is skinny.
If Arthur is not cute, then Albert is not skinny and Johnny is not historical.
Someone who is both historical and elderly is always not unsightly.
If Todd is similar and Johnny is not historical, then Kirby is unsightly and Burton is elderly.
If Arthur is not similar, then Jerry is not elderly and Johnny is not skinny, and vice versa.
Burton being similar or Johnny being not skinny implies that Arthur is elderly.
Someone being both not unsightly and not historical is equivalent to being similar and not cute.
Someone is skinny and not cute if and only if he is elderly. | Albert is similar. | contradiction |
Johnny is not historical.
Albert is not elderly.
Todd is not unsightly.
Johnny is not elderly.
Johnny is not skinny.
Todd is not cute.
Jerry is not elderly.
Burton is historical.
Albert is not similar.
Johnny is not cute.
Jerry is not unsightly.
Kirby is not unsightly.If there is at least one people who is not similar or skinny, then Burton is not historical.
If there is at least one people who is not unsightly, then Arthur is cute and Jerry is not similar.
If all people are not skinny, then Jerry is not unsightly.
All skinny people are unsightly.
If there is someone who is not unsightly, then Jerry is not cute and Jerry is skinny.
If Arthur is not cute, then Albert is not skinny and Johnny is not historical.
Someone who is both historical and elderly is always not unsightly.
If Todd is similar and Johnny is not historical, then Kirby is unsightly and Burton is elderly.
If Arthur is not similar, then Jerry is not elderly and Johnny is not skinny, and vice versa.
Burton being similar or Johnny being not skinny implies that Arthur is elderly.
Someone being both not unsightly and not historical is equivalent to being similar and not cute.
Someone is skinny and not cute if and only if he is elderly. | Arthur is not cute. | self_contradiction |
Johnny is not historical.
Albert is not elderly.
Todd is not unsightly.
Johnny is not elderly.
Johnny is not skinny.
Todd is not cute.
Jerry is not elderly.
Burton is historical.
Albert is not similar.
Johnny is not cute.
Jerry is not unsightly.
Kirby is not unsightly.If there is at least one people who is not similar or skinny, then Burton is not historical.
If there is at least one people who is not unsightly, then Arthur is cute and Jerry is not similar.
If all people are not skinny, then Jerry is not unsightly.
All skinny people are unsightly.
If there is someone who is not unsightly, then Jerry is not cute and Jerry is skinny.
If Arthur is not cute, then Albert is not skinny and Johnny is not historical.
Someone who is both historical and elderly is always not unsightly.
If Todd is similar and Johnny is not historical, then Kirby is unsightly and Burton is elderly.
If Arthur is not similar, then Jerry is not elderly and Johnny is not skinny, and vice versa.
Burton being similar or Johnny being not skinny implies that Arthur is elderly.
Someone being both not unsightly and not historical is equivalent to being similar and not cute.
Someone is skinny and not cute if and only if he is elderly. | Albert is unsightly. | neutral |
Johnny is not historical.
Albert is not elderly.
Todd is not unsightly.
Johnny is not elderly.
Johnny is not skinny.
Todd is not cute.
Jerry is not elderly.
Burton is historical.
Albert is not similar.
Johnny is not cute.
Jerry is not unsightly.
Kirby is not unsightly.If there is at least one people who is not similar or skinny, then Burton is not historical.
If there is at least one people who is not unsightly, then Arthur is cute and Jerry is not similar.
If all people are not skinny, then Jerry is not unsightly.
All skinny people are unsightly.
If there is someone who is not unsightly, then Jerry is not cute and Jerry is skinny.
If Arthur is not cute, then Albert is not skinny and Johnny is not historical.
Someone who is both historical and elderly is always not unsightly.
If Todd is similar and Johnny is not historical, then Kirby is unsightly and Burton is elderly.
If Arthur is not similar, then Jerry is not elderly and Johnny is not skinny, and vice versa.
Burton being similar or Johnny being not skinny implies that Arthur is elderly.
Someone being both not unsightly and not historical is equivalent to being similar and not cute.
Someone is skinny and not cute if and only if he is elderly. | Albert is not skinny. | entailment |
Johnny is not historical.
Albert is not elderly.
Todd is not unsightly.
Johnny is not elderly.
Johnny is not skinny.
Todd is not cute.
Jerry is not elderly.
Burton is historical.
Albert is not similar.
Johnny is not cute.
Jerry is not unsightly.
Kirby is not unsightly.If there is at least one people who is not similar or skinny, then Burton is not historical.
If there is at least one people who is not unsightly, then Arthur is cute and Jerry is not similar.
If all people are not skinny, then Jerry is not unsightly.
All skinny people are unsightly.
If there is someone who is not unsightly, then Jerry is not cute and Jerry is skinny.
If Arthur is not cute, then Albert is not skinny and Johnny is not historical.
Someone who is both historical and elderly is always not unsightly.
If Todd is similar and Johnny is not historical, then Kirby is unsightly and Burton is elderly.
If Arthur is not similar, then Jerry is not elderly and Johnny is not skinny, and vice versa.
Burton being similar or Johnny being not skinny implies that Arthur is elderly.
Someone being both not unsightly and not historical is equivalent to being similar and not cute.
Someone is skinny and not cute if and only if he is elderly. | Jerry is not cute. | entailment |
Johnny is not historical.
Albert is not elderly.
Todd is not unsightly.
Johnny is not elderly.
Johnny is not skinny.
Todd is not cute.
Jerry is not elderly.
Burton is historical.
Albert is not similar.
Johnny is not cute.
Jerry is not unsightly.
Kirby is not unsightly.If there is at least one people who is not similar or skinny, then Burton is not historical.
If there is at least one people who is not unsightly, then Arthur is cute and Jerry is not similar.
If all people are not skinny, then Jerry is not unsightly.
All skinny people are unsightly.
If there is someone who is not unsightly, then Jerry is not cute and Jerry is skinny.
If Arthur is not cute, then Albert is not skinny and Johnny is not historical.
Someone who is both historical and elderly is always not unsightly.
If Todd is similar and Johnny is not historical, then Kirby is unsightly and Burton is elderly.
If Arthur is not similar, then Jerry is not elderly and Johnny is not skinny, and vice versa.
Burton being similar or Johnny being not skinny implies that Arthur is elderly.
Someone being both not unsightly and not historical is equivalent to being similar and not cute.
Someone is skinny and not cute if and only if he is elderly. | Todd is elderly. | neutral |
Johnny is not historical.
Albert is not elderly.
Todd is not unsightly.
Johnny is not elderly.
Johnny is not skinny.
Todd is not cute.
Jerry is not elderly.
Burton is historical.
Albert is not similar.
Johnny is not cute.
Jerry is not unsightly.
Kirby is not unsightly.If there is at least one people who is not similar or skinny, then Burton is not historical.
If there is at least one people who is not unsightly, then Arthur is cute and Jerry is not similar.
If all people are not skinny, then Jerry is not unsightly.
All skinny people are unsightly.
If there is someone who is not unsightly, then Jerry is not cute and Jerry is skinny.
If Arthur is not cute, then Albert is not skinny and Johnny is not historical.
Someone who is both historical and elderly is always not unsightly.
If Todd is similar and Johnny is not historical, then Kirby is unsightly and Burton is elderly.
If Arthur is not similar, then Jerry is not elderly and Johnny is not skinny, and vice versa.
Burton being similar or Johnny being not skinny implies that Arthur is elderly.
Someone being both not unsightly and not historical is equivalent to being similar and not cute.
Someone is skinny and not cute if and only if he is elderly. | Albert is not cute. | neutral |
Johnny is not historical.
Albert is not elderly.
Todd is not unsightly.
Johnny is not elderly.
Johnny is not skinny.
Todd is not cute.
Jerry is not elderly.
Burton is historical.
Albert is not similar.
Johnny is not cute.
Jerry is not unsightly.
Kirby is not unsightly.If there is at least one people who is not similar or skinny, then Burton is not historical.
If there is at least one people who is not unsightly, then Arthur is cute and Jerry is not similar.
If all people are not skinny, then Jerry is not unsightly.
All skinny people are unsightly.
If there is someone who is not unsightly, then Jerry is not cute and Jerry is skinny.
If Arthur is not cute, then Albert is not skinny and Johnny is not historical.
Someone who is both historical and elderly is always not unsightly.
If Todd is similar and Johnny is not historical, then Kirby is unsightly and Burton is elderly.
If Arthur is not similar, then Jerry is not elderly and Johnny is not skinny, and vice versa.
Burton being similar or Johnny being not skinny implies that Arthur is elderly.
Someone being both not unsightly and not historical is equivalent to being similar and not cute.
Someone is skinny and not cute if and only if he is elderly. | Jerry is unsightly. | self_contradiction |
Johnny is not historical.
Albert is not elderly.
Todd is not unsightly.
Johnny is not elderly.
Johnny is not skinny.
Todd is not cute.
Jerry is not elderly.
Burton is historical.
Albert is not similar.
Johnny is not cute.
Jerry is not unsightly.
Kirby is not unsightly.If there is at least one people who is not similar or skinny, then Burton is not historical.
If there is at least one people who is not unsightly, then Arthur is cute and Jerry is not similar.
If all people are not skinny, then Jerry is not unsightly.
All skinny people are unsightly.
If there is someone who is not unsightly, then Jerry is not cute and Jerry is skinny.
If Arthur is not cute, then Albert is not skinny and Johnny is not historical.
Someone who is both historical and elderly is always not unsightly.
If Todd is similar and Johnny is not historical, then Kirby is unsightly and Burton is elderly.
If Arthur is not similar, then Jerry is not elderly and Johnny is not skinny, and vice versa.
Burton being similar or Johnny being not skinny implies that Arthur is elderly.
Someone being both not unsightly and not historical is equivalent to being similar and not cute.
Someone is skinny and not cute if and only if he is elderly. | Todd is not similar. | neutral |
Johnny is not historical.
Albert is not elderly.
Todd is not unsightly.
Johnny is not elderly.
Johnny is not skinny.
Todd is not cute.
Jerry is not elderly.
Burton is historical.
Albert is not similar.
Johnny is not cute.
Jerry is not unsightly.
Kirby is not unsightly.If there is at least one people who is not similar or skinny, then Burton is not historical.
If there is at least one people who is not unsightly, then Arthur is cute and Jerry is not similar.
If all people are not skinny, then Jerry is not unsightly.
All skinny people are unsightly.
If there is someone who is not unsightly, then Jerry is not cute and Jerry is skinny.
If Arthur is not cute, then Albert is not skinny and Johnny is not historical.
Someone who is both historical and elderly is always not unsightly.
If Todd is similar and Johnny is not historical, then Kirby is unsightly and Burton is elderly.
If Arthur is not similar, then Jerry is not elderly and Johnny is not skinny, and vice versa.
Burton being similar or Johnny being not skinny implies that Arthur is elderly.
Someone being both not unsightly and not historical is equivalent to being similar and not cute.
Someone is skinny and not cute if and only if he is elderly. | Johnny is not similar. | neutral |
Johnny is not historical.
Albert is not elderly.
Todd is not unsightly.
Johnny is not elderly.
Johnny is not skinny.
Todd is not cute.
Jerry is not elderly.
Burton is historical.
Albert is not similar.
Johnny is not cute.
Jerry is not unsightly.
Kirby is not unsightly.If there is at least one people who is not similar or skinny, then Burton is not historical.
If there is at least one people who is not unsightly, then Arthur is cute and Jerry is not similar.
If all people are not skinny, then Jerry is not unsightly.
All skinny people are unsightly.
If there is someone who is not unsightly, then Jerry is not cute and Jerry is skinny.
If Arthur is not cute, then Albert is not skinny and Johnny is not historical.
Someone who is both historical and elderly is always not unsightly.
If Todd is similar and Johnny is not historical, then Kirby is unsightly and Burton is elderly.
If Arthur is not similar, then Jerry is not elderly and Johnny is not skinny, and vice versa.
Burton being similar or Johnny being not skinny implies that Arthur is elderly.
Someone being both not unsightly and not historical is equivalent to being similar and not cute.
Someone is skinny and not cute if and only if he is elderly. | Albert is not elderly. | entailment |
Johnny is not historical.
Albert is not elderly.
Todd is not unsightly.
Johnny is not elderly.
Johnny is not skinny.
Todd is not cute.
Jerry is not elderly.
Burton is historical.
Albert is not similar.
Johnny is not cute.
Jerry is not unsightly.
Kirby is not unsightly.If there is at least one people who is not similar or skinny, then Burton is not historical.
If there is at least one people who is not unsightly, then Arthur is cute and Jerry is not similar.
If all people are not skinny, then Jerry is not unsightly.
All skinny people are unsightly.
If there is someone who is not unsightly, then Jerry is not cute and Jerry is skinny.
If Arthur is not cute, then Albert is not skinny and Johnny is not historical.
Someone who is both historical and elderly is always not unsightly.
If Todd is similar and Johnny is not historical, then Kirby is unsightly and Burton is elderly.
If Arthur is not similar, then Jerry is not elderly and Johnny is not skinny, and vice versa.
Burton being similar or Johnny being not skinny implies that Arthur is elderly.
Someone being both not unsightly and not historical is equivalent to being similar and not cute.
Someone is skinny and not cute if and only if he is elderly. | Jerry is not skinny. | contradiction |
Johnny is not historical.
Albert is not elderly.
Todd is not unsightly.
Johnny is not elderly.
Johnny is not skinny.
Todd is not cute.
Jerry is not elderly.
Burton is historical.
Albert is not similar.
Johnny is not cute.
Jerry is not unsightly.
Kirby is not unsightly.If there is at least one people who is not similar or skinny, then Burton is not historical.
If there is at least one people who is not unsightly, then Arthur is cute and Jerry is not similar.
If all people are not skinny, then Jerry is not unsightly.
All skinny people are unsightly.
If there is someone who is not unsightly, then Jerry is not cute and Jerry is skinny.
If Arthur is not cute, then Albert is not skinny and Johnny is not historical.
Someone who is both historical and elderly is always not unsightly.
If Todd is similar and Johnny is not historical, then Kirby is unsightly and Burton is elderly.
If Arthur is not similar, then Jerry is not elderly and Johnny is not skinny, and vice versa.
Burton being similar or Johnny being not skinny implies that Arthur is elderly.
Someone being both not unsightly and not historical is equivalent to being similar and not cute.
Someone is skinny and not cute if and only if he is elderly. | Jerry is not elderly. | self_contradiction |
Johnny is not historical.
Albert is not elderly.
Todd is not unsightly.
Johnny is not elderly.
Johnny is not skinny.
Todd is not cute.
Jerry is not elderly.
Burton is historical.
Albert is not similar.
Johnny is not cute.
Jerry is not unsightly.
Kirby is not unsightly.If there is at least one people who is not similar or skinny, then Burton is not historical.
If there is at least one people who is not unsightly, then Arthur is cute and Jerry is not similar.
If all people are not skinny, then Jerry is not unsightly.
All skinny people are unsightly.
If there is someone who is not unsightly, then Jerry is not cute and Jerry is skinny.
If Arthur is not cute, then Albert is not skinny and Johnny is not historical.
Someone who is both historical and elderly is always not unsightly.
If Todd is similar and Johnny is not historical, then Kirby is unsightly and Burton is elderly.
If Arthur is not similar, then Jerry is not elderly and Johnny is not skinny, and vice versa.
Burton being similar or Johnny being not skinny implies that Arthur is elderly.
Someone being both not unsightly and not historical is equivalent to being similar and not cute.
Someone is skinny and not cute if and only if he is elderly. | Arthur is not skinny. | contradiction |
Johnny is not historical.
Albert is not elderly.
Todd is not unsightly.
Johnny is not elderly.
Johnny is not skinny.
Todd is not cute.
Jerry is not elderly.
Burton is historical.
Albert is not similar.
Johnny is not cute.
Jerry is not unsightly.
Kirby is not unsightly.If there is at least one people who is not similar or skinny, then Burton is not historical.
If there is at least one people who is not unsightly, then Arthur is cute and Jerry is not similar.
If all people are not skinny, then Jerry is not unsightly.
All skinny people are unsightly.
If there is someone who is not unsightly, then Jerry is not cute and Jerry is skinny.
If Arthur is not cute, then Albert is not skinny and Johnny is not historical.
Someone who is both historical and elderly is always not unsightly.
If Todd is similar and Johnny is not historical, then Kirby is unsightly and Burton is elderly.
If Arthur is not similar, then Jerry is not elderly and Johnny is not skinny, and vice versa.
Burton being similar or Johnny being not skinny implies that Arthur is elderly.
Someone being both not unsightly and not historical is equivalent to being similar and not cute.
Someone is skinny and not cute if and only if he is elderly. | Johnny is historical. | contradiction |
Johnny is not historical.
Albert is not elderly.
Todd is not unsightly.
Johnny is not elderly.
Johnny is not skinny.
Todd is not cute.
Jerry is not elderly.
Burton is historical.
Albert is not similar.
Johnny is not cute.
Jerry is not unsightly.
Kirby is not unsightly.If there is at least one people who is not similar or skinny, then Burton is not historical.
If there is at least one people who is not unsightly, then Arthur is cute and Jerry is not similar.
If all people are not skinny, then Jerry is not unsightly.
All skinny people are unsightly.
If there is someone who is not unsightly, then Jerry is not cute and Jerry is skinny.
If Arthur is not cute, then Albert is not skinny and Johnny is not historical.
Someone who is both historical and elderly is always not unsightly.
If Todd is similar and Johnny is not historical, then Kirby is unsightly and Burton is elderly.
If Arthur is not similar, then Jerry is not elderly and Johnny is not skinny, and vice versa.
Burton being similar or Johnny being not skinny implies that Arthur is elderly.
Someone being both not unsightly and not historical is equivalent to being similar and not cute.
Someone is skinny and not cute if and only if he is elderly. | Jerry is not unsightly. | self_contradiction |
Johnny is not historical.
Albert is not elderly.
Todd is not unsightly.
Johnny is not elderly.
Johnny is not skinny.
Todd is not cute.
Jerry is not elderly.
Burton is historical.
Albert is not similar.
Johnny is not cute.
Jerry is not unsightly.
Kirby is not unsightly.If there is at least one people who is not similar or skinny, then Burton is not historical.
If there is at least one people who is not unsightly, then Arthur is cute and Jerry is not similar.
If all people are not skinny, then Jerry is not unsightly.
All skinny people are unsightly.
If there is someone who is not unsightly, then Jerry is not cute and Jerry is skinny.
If Arthur is not cute, then Albert is not skinny and Johnny is not historical.
Someone who is both historical and elderly is always not unsightly.
If Todd is similar and Johnny is not historical, then Kirby is unsightly and Burton is elderly.
If Arthur is not similar, then Jerry is not elderly and Johnny is not skinny, and vice versa.
Burton being similar or Johnny being not skinny implies that Arthur is elderly.
Someone being both not unsightly and not historical is equivalent to being similar and not cute.
Someone is skinny and not cute if and only if he is elderly. | Johnny is cute. | contradiction |
Johnny is not historical.
Albert is not elderly.
Todd is not unsightly.
Johnny is not elderly.
Johnny is not skinny.
Todd is not cute.
Jerry is not elderly.
Burton is historical.
Albert is not similar.
Johnny is not cute.
Jerry is not unsightly.
Kirby is not unsightly.If there is at least one people who is not similar or skinny, then Burton is not historical.
If there is at least one people who is not unsightly, then Arthur is cute and Jerry is not similar.
If all people are not skinny, then Jerry is not unsightly.
All skinny people are unsightly.
If there is someone who is not unsightly, then Jerry is not cute and Jerry is skinny.
If Arthur is not cute, then Albert is not skinny and Johnny is not historical.
Someone who is both historical and elderly is always not unsightly.
If Todd is similar and Johnny is not historical, then Kirby is unsightly and Burton is elderly.
If Arthur is not similar, then Jerry is not elderly and Johnny is not skinny, and vice versa.
Burton being similar or Johnny being not skinny implies that Arthur is elderly.
Someone being both not unsightly and not historical is equivalent to being similar and not cute.
Someone is skinny and not cute if and only if he is elderly. | Burton is not historical. | self_contradiction |
Hanna is impartial.
Marion is not courageous.
Brice is combative.
Katrina is not cooperative.
Katrina is not courageous.
Luisa is cooperative.
Luisa is not combative.
Mark is not impartial.
Marion is not impartial.
Luisa is courageous.
Mark is not combative.
Mark is not courageous.If there is someone who is not psychological, then Hanna is not impartial.
If there is someone who is psychological, then Luisa is not combative and Hanna is courageous.
Someone is not cooperative and not impartial if and only if he is not federal and courageous.
Katrina being not combative is equivalent to Marion being psychological and Luisa being courageous.
If there is someone who is not federal, then Hanna is impartial.
If there is nobody who is not psychological, then Walter is not courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both combative and impartial, then Katrina is courageous.
All not cooperative people are not federal.
If someone is combative and not federal, then he is not impartial, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Katrina is not combative once knowing that Walter is psychological.
If there is someone who is either courageous or psychological, then Katrina is not combative and Marion is not cooperative.
If someone is not impartial, then he is not federal, and vice versa. | Katrina is not federal. | entailment |
Hanna is impartial.
Marion is not courageous.
Brice is combative.
Katrina is not cooperative.
Katrina is not courageous.
Luisa is cooperative.
Luisa is not combative.
Mark is not impartial.
Marion is not impartial.
Luisa is courageous.
Mark is not combative.
Mark is not courageous.If there is someone who is not psychological, then Hanna is not impartial.
If there is someone who is psychological, then Luisa is not combative and Hanna is courageous.
Someone is not cooperative and not impartial if and only if he is not federal and courageous.
Katrina being not combative is equivalent to Marion being psychological and Luisa being courageous.
If there is someone who is not federal, then Hanna is impartial.
If there is nobody who is not psychological, then Walter is not courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both combative and impartial, then Katrina is courageous.
All not cooperative people are not federal.
If someone is combative and not federal, then he is not impartial, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Katrina is not combative once knowing that Walter is psychological.
If there is someone who is either courageous or psychological, then Katrina is not combative and Marion is not cooperative.
If someone is not impartial, then he is not federal, and vice versa. | Marion is federal. | contradiction |
Hanna is impartial.
Marion is not courageous.
Brice is combative.
Katrina is not cooperative.
Katrina is not courageous.
Luisa is cooperative.
Luisa is not combative.
Mark is not impartial.
Marion is not impartial.
Luisa is courageous.
Mark is not combative.
Mark is not courageous.If there is someone who is not psychological, then Hanna is not impartial.
If there is someone who is psychological, then Luisa is not combative and Hanna is courageous.
Someone is not cooperative and not impartial if and only if he is not federal and courageous.
Katrina being not combative is equivalent to Marion being psychological and Luisa being courageous.
If there is someone who is not federal, then Hanna is impartial.
If there is nobody who is not psychological, then Walter is not courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both combative and impartial, then Katrina is courageous.
All not cooperative people are not federal.
If someone is combative and not federal, then he is not impartial, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Katrina is not combative once knowing that Walter is psychological.
If there is someone who is either courageous or psychological, then Katrina is not combative and Marion is not cooperative.
If someone is not impartial, then he is not federal, and vice versa. | Mark is combative. | self_contradiction |
Hanna is impartial.
Marion is not courageous.
Brice is combative.
Katrina is not cooperative.
Katrina is not courageous.
Luisa is cooperative.
Luisa is not combative.
Mark is not impartial.
Marion is not impartial.
Luisa is courageous.
Mark is not combative.
Mark is not courageous.If there is someone who is not psychological, then Hanna is not impartial.
If there is someone who is psychological, then Luisa is not combative and Hanna is courageous.
Someone is not cooperative and not impartial if and only if he is not federal and courageous.
Katrina being not combative is equivalent to Marion being psychological and Luisa being courageous.
If there is someone who is not federal, then Hanna is impartial.
If there is nobody who is not psychological, then Walter is not courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both combative and impartial, then Katrina is courageous.
All not cooperative people are not federal.
If someone is combative and not federal, then he is not impartial, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Katrina is not combative once knowing that Walter is psychological.
If there is someone who is either courageous or psychological, then Katrina is not combative and Marion is not cooperative.
If someone is not impartial, then he is not federal, and vice versa. | Luisa is combative. | contradiction |
Hanna is impartial.
Marion is not courageous.
Brice is combative.
Katrina is not cooperative.
Katrina is not courageous.
Luisa is cooperative.
Luisa is not combative.
Mark is not impartial.
Marion is not impartial.
Luisa is courageous.
Mark is not combative.
Mark is not courageous.If there is someone who is not psychological, then Hanna is not impartial.
If there is someone who is psychological, then Luisa is not combative and Hanna is courageous.
Someone is not cooperative and not impartial if and only if he is not federal and courageous.
Katrina being not combative is equivalent to Marion being psychological and Luisa being courageous.
If there is someone who is not federal, then Hanna is impartial.
If there is nobody who is not psychological, then Walter is not courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both combative and impartial, then Katrina is courageous.
All not cooperative people are not federal.
If someone is combative and not federal, then he is not impartial, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Katrina is not combative once knowing that Walter is psychological.
If there is someone who is either courageous or psychological, then Katrina is not combative and Marion is not cooperative.
If someone is not impartial, then he is not federal, and vice versa. | Katrina is not courageous. | self_contradiction |
Hanna is impartial.
Marion is not courageous.
Brice is combative.
Katrina is not cooperative.
Katrina is not courageous.
Luisa is cooperative.
Luisa is not combative.
Mark is not impartial.
Marion is not impartial.
Luisa is courageous.
Mark is not combative.
Mark is not courageous.If there is someone who is not psychological, then Hanna is not impartial.
If there is someone who is psychological, then Luisa is not combative and Hanna is courageous.
Someone is not cooperative and not impartial if and only if he is not federal and courageous.
Katrina being not combative is equivalent to Marion being psychological and Luisa being courageous.
If there is someone who is not federal, then Hanna is impartial.
If there is nobody who is not psychological, then Walter is not courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both combative and impartial, then Katrina is courageous.
All not cooperative people are not federal.
If someone is combative and not federal, then he is not impartial, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Katrina is not combative once knowing that Walter is psychological.
If there is someone who is either courageous or psychological, then Katrina is not combative and Marion is not cooperative.
If someone is not impartial, then he is not federal, and vice versa. | Katrina is not impartial. | entailment |
Hanna is impartial.
Marion is not courageous.
Brice is combative.
Katrina is not cooperative.
Katrina is not courageous.
Luisa is cooperative.
Luisa is not combative.
Mark is not impartial.
Marion is not impartial.
Luisa is courageous.
Mark is not combative.
Mark is not courageous.If there is someone who is not psychological, then Hanna is not impartial.
If there is someone who is psychological, then Luisa is not combative and Hanna is courageous.
Someone is not cooperative and not impartial if and only if he is not federal and courageous.
Katrina being not combative is equivalent to Marion being psychological and Luisa being courageous.
If there is someone who is not federal, then Hanna is impartial.
If there is nobody who is not psychological, then Walter is not courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both combative and impartial, then Katrina is courageous.
All not cooperative people are not federal.
If someone is combative and not federal, then he is not impartial, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Katrina is not combative once knowing that Walter is psychological.
If there is someone who is either courageous or psychological, then Katrina is not combative and Marion is not cooperative.
If someone is not impartial, then he is not federal, and vice versa. | Brice is not psychological. | neutral |
Hanna is impartial.
Marion is not courageous.
Brice is combative.
Katrina is not cooperative.
Katrina is not courageous.
Luisa is cooperative.
Luisa is not combative.
Mark is not impartial.
Marion is not impartial.
Luisa is courageous.
Mark is not combative.
Mark is not courageous.If there is someone who is not psychological, then Hanna is not impartial.
If there is someone who is psychological, then Luisa is not combative and Hanna is courageous.
Someone is not cooperative and not impartial if and only if he is not federal and courageous.
Katrina being not combative is equivalent to Marion being psychological and Luisa being courageous.
If there is someone who is not federal, then Hanna is impartial.
If there is nobody who is not psychological, then Walter is not courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both combative and impartial, then Katrina is courageous.
All not cooperative people are not federal.
If someone is combative and not federal, then he is not impartial, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Katrina is not combative once knowing that Walter is psychological.
If there is someone who is either courageous or psychological, then Katrina is not combative and Marion is not cooperative.
If someone is not impartial, then he is not federal, and vice versa. | Brice is not courageous. | neutral |
Hanna is impartial.
Marion is not courageous.
Brice is combative.
Katrina is not cooperative.
Katrina is not courageous.
Luisa is cooperative.
Luisa is not combative.
Mark is not impartial.
Marion is not impartial.
Luisa is courageous.
Mark is not combative.
Mark is not courageous.If there is someone who is not psychological, then Hanna is not impartial.
If there is someone who is psychological, then Luisa is not combative and Hanna is courageous.
Someone is not cooperative and not impartial if and only if he is not federal and courageous.
Katrina being not combative is equivalent to Marion being psychological and Luisa being courageous.
If there is someone who is not federal, then Hanna is impartial.
If there is nobody who is not psychological, then Walter is not courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both combative and impartial, then Katrina is courageous.
All not cooperative people are not federal.
If someone is combative and not federal, then he is not impartial, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Katrina is not combative once knowing that Walter is psychological.
If there is someone who is either courageous or psychological, then Katrina is not combative and Marion is not cooperative.
If someone is not impartial, then he is not federal, and vice versa. | Walter is psychological. | neutral |
Hanna is impartial.
Marion is not courageous.
Brice is combative.
Katrina is not cooperative.
Katrina is not courageous.
Luisa is cooperative.
Luisa is not combative.
Mark is not impartial.
Marion is not impartial.
Luisa is courageous.
Mark is not combative.
Mark is not courageous.If there is someone who is not psychological, then Hanna is not impartial.
If there is someone who is psychological, then Luisa is not combative and Hanna is courageous.
Someone is not cooperative and not impartial if and only if he is not federal and courageous.
Katrina being not combative is equivalent to Marion being psychological and Luisa being courageous.
If there is someone who is not federal, then Hanna is impartial.
If there is nobody who is not psychological, then Walter is not courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both combative and impartial, then Katrina is courageous.
All not cooperative people are not federal.
If someone is combative and not federal, then he is not impartial, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Katrina is not combative once knowing that Walter is psychological.
If there is someone who is either courageous or psychological, then Katrina is not combative and Marion is not cooperative.
If someone is not impartial, then he is not federal, and vice versa. | Luisa is cooperative. | entailment |
Hanna is impartial.
Marion is not courageous.
Brice is combative.
Katrina is not cooperative.
Katrina is not courageous.
Luisa is cooperative.
Luisa is not combative.
Mark is not impartial.
Marion is not impartial.
Luisa is courageous.
Mark is not combative.
Mark is not courageous.If there is someone who is not psychological, then Hanna is not impartial.
If there is someone who is psychological, then Luisa is not combative and Hanna is courageous.
Someone is not cooperative and not impartial if and only if he is not federal and courageous.
Katrina being not combative is equivalent to Marion being psychological and Luisa being courageous.
If there is someone who is not federal, then Hanna is impartial.
If there is nobody who is not psychological, then Walter is not courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both combative and impartial, then Katrina is courageous.
All not cooperative people are not federal.
If someone is combative and not federal, then he is not impartial, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Katrina is not combative once knowing that Walter is psychological.
If there is someone who is either courageous or psychological, then Katrina is not combative and Marion is not cooperative.
If someone is not impartial, then he is not federal, and vice versa. | Marion is cooperative. | contradiction |
Hanna is impartial.
Marion is not courageous.
Brice is combative.
Katrina is not cooperative.
Katrina is not courageous.
Luisa is cooperative.
Luisa is not combative.
Mark is not impartial.
Marion is not impartial.
Luisa is courageous.
Mark is not combative.
Mark is not courageous.If there is someone who is not psychological, then Hanna is not impartial.
If there is someone who is psychological, then Luisa is not combative and Hanna is courageous.
Someone is not cooperative and not impartial if and only if he is not federal and courageous.
Katrina being not combative is equivalent to Marion being psychological and Luisa being courageous.
If there is someone who is not federal, then Hanna is impartial.
If there is nobody who is not psychological, then Walter is not courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both combative and impartial, then Katrina is courageous.
All not cooperative people are not federal.
If someone is combative and not federal, then he is not impartial, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Katrina is not combative once knowing that Walter is psychological.
If there is someone who is either courageous or psychological, then Katrina is not combative and Marion is not cooperative.
If someone is not impartial, then he is not federal, and vice versa. | Luisa is courageous. | entailment |
Hanna is impartial.
Marion is not courageous.
Brice is combative.
Katrina is not cooperative.
Katrina is not courageous.
Luisa is cooperative.
Luisa is not combative.
Mark is not impartial.
Marion is not impartial.
Luisa is courageous.
Mark is not combative.
Mark is not courageous.If there is someone who is not psychological, then Hanna is not impartial.
If there is someone who is psychological, then Luisa is not combative and Hanna is courageous.
Someone is not cooperative and not impartial if and only if he is not federal and courageous.
Katrina being not combative is equivalent to Marion being psychological and Luisa being courageous.
If there is someone who is not federal, then Hanna is impartial.
If there is nobody who is not psychological, then Walter is not courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both combative and impartial, then Katrina is courageous.
All not cooperative people are not federal.
If someone is combative and not federal, then he is not impartial, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Katrina is not combative once knowing that Walter is psychological.
If there is someone who is either courageous or psychological, then Katrina is not combative and Marion is not cooperative.
If someone is not impartial, then he is not federal, and vice versa. | Katrina is courageous. | self_contradiction |
Hanna is impartial.
Marion is not courageous.
Brice is combative.
Katrina is not cooperative.
Katrina is not courageous.
Luisa is cooperative.
Luisa is not combative.
Mark is not impartial.
Marion is not impartial.
Luisa is courageous.
Mark is not combative.
Mark is not courageous.If there is someone who is not psychological, then Hanna is not impartial.
If there is someone who is psychological, then Luisa is not combative and Hanna is courageous.
Someone is not cooperative and not impartial if and only if he is not federal and courageous.
Katrina being not combative is equivalent to Marion being psychological and Luisa being courageous.
If there is someone who is not federal, then Hanna is impartial.
If there is nobody who is not psychological, then Walter is not courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both combative and impartial, then Katrina is courageous.
All not cooperative people are not federal.
If someone is combative and not federal, then he is not impartial, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Katrina is not combative once knowing that Walter is psychological.
If there is someone who is either courageous or psychological, then Katrina is not combative and Marion is not cooperative.
If someone is not impartial, then he is not federal, and vice versa. | Katrina is not combative. | self_contradiction |
Hanna is impartial.
Marion is not courageous.
Brice is combative.
Katrina is not cooperative.
Katrina is not courageous.
Luisa is cooperative.
Luisa is not combative.
Mark is not impartial.
Marion is not impartial.
Luisa is courageous.
Mark is not combative.
Mark is not courageous.If there is someone who is not psychological, then Hanna is not impartial.
If there is someone who is psychological, then Luisa is not combative and Hanna is courageous.
Someone is not cooperative and not impartial if and only if he is not federal and courageous.
Katrina being not combative is equivalent to Marion being psychological and Luisa being courageous.
If there is someone who is not federal, then Hanna is impartial.
If there is nobody who is not psychological, then Walter is not courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both combative and impartial, then Katrina is courageous.
All not cooperative people are not federal.
If someone is combative and not federal, then he is not impartial, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Katrina is not combative once knowing that Walter is psychological.
If there is someone who is either courageous or psychological, then Katrina is not combative and Marion is not cooperative.
If someone is not impartial, then he is not federal, and vice versa. | Hanna is not impartial. | contradiction |
Hanna is impartial.
Marion is not courageous.
Brice is combative.
Katrina is not cooperative.
Katrina is not courageous.
Luisa is cooperative.
Luisa is not combative.
Mark is not impartial.
Marion is not impartial.
Luisa is courageous.
Mark is not combative.
Mark is not courageous.If there is someone who is not psychological, then Hanna is not impartial.
If there is someone who is psychological, then Luisa is not combative and Hanna is courageous.
Someone is not cooperative and not impartial if and only if he is not federal and courageous.
Katrina being not combative is equivalent to Marion being psychological and Luisa being courageous.
If there is someone who is not federal, then Hanna is impartial.
If there is nobody who is not psychological, then Walter is not courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both combative and impartial, then Katrina is courageous.
All not cooperative people are not federal.
If someone is combative and not federal, then he is not impartial, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Katrina is not combative once knowing that Walter is psychological.
If there is someone who is either courageous or psychological, then Katrina is not combative and Marion is not cooperative.
If someone is not impartial, then he is not federal, and vice versa. | Hanna is psychological. | neutral |
Hanna is impartial.
Marion is not courageous.
Brice is combative.
Katrina is not cooperative.
Katrina is not courageous.
Luisa is cooperative.
Luisa is not combative.
Mark is not impartial.
Marion is not impartial.
Luisa is courageous.
Mark is not combative.
Mark is not courageous.If there is someone who is not psychological, then Hanna is not impartial.
If there is someone who is psychological, then Luisa is not combative and Hanna is courageous.
Someone is not cooperative and not impartial if and only if he is not federal and courageous.
Katrina being not combative is equivalent to Marion being psychological and Luisa being courageous.
If there is someone who is not federal, then Hanna is impartial.
If there is nobody who is not psychological, then Walter is not courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both combative and impartial, then Katrina is courageous.
All not cooperative people are not federal.
If someone is combative and not federal, then he is not impartial, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Katrina is not combative once knowing that Walter is psychological.
If there is someone who is either courageous or psychological, then Katrina is not combative and Marion is not cooperative.
If someone is not impartial, then he is not federal, and vice versa. | Hanna is impartial. | entailment |
Hanna is impartial.
Marion is not courageous.
Brice is combative.
Katrina is not cooperative.
Katrina is not courageous.
Luisa is cooperative.
Luisa is not combative.
Mark is not impartial.
Marion is not impartial.
Luisa is courageous.
Mark is not combative.
Mark is not courageous.If there is someone who is not psychological, then Hanna is not impartial.
If there is someone who is psychological, then Luisa is not combative and Hanna is courageous.
Someone is not cooperative and not impartial if and only if he is not federal and courageous.
Katrina being not combative is equivalent to Marion being psychological and Luisa being courageous.
If there is someone who is not federal, then Hanna is impartial.
If there is nobody who is not psychological, then Walter is not courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both combative and impartial, then Katrina is courageous.
All not cooperative people are not federal.
If someone is combative and not federal, then he is not impartial, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Katrina is not combative once knowing that Walter is psychological.
If there is someone who is either courageous or psychological, then Katrina is not combative and Marion is not cooperative.
If someone is not impartial, then he is not federal, and vice versa. | Marion is courageous. | self_contradiction |
Hanna is impartial.
Marion is not courageous.
Brice is combative.
Katrina is not cooperative.
Katrina is not courageous.
Luisa is cooperative.
Luisa is not combative.
Mark is not impartial.
Marion is not impartial.
Luisa is courageous.
Mark is not combative.
Mark is not courageous.If there is someone who is not psychological, then Hanna is not impartial.
If there is someone who is psychological, then Luisa is not combative and Hanna is courageous.
Someone is not cooperative and not impartial if and only if he is not federal and courageous.
Katrina being not combative is equivalent to Marion being psychological and Luisa being courageous.
If there is someone who is not federal, then Hanna is impartial.
If there is nobody who is not psychological, then Walter is not courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both combative and impartial, then Katrina is courageous.
All not cooperative people are not federal.
If someone is combative and not federal, then he is not impartial, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Katrina is not combative once knowing that Walter is psychological.
If there is someone who is either courageous or psychological, then Katrina is not combative and Marion is not cooperative.
If someone is not impartial, then he is not federal, and vice versa. | Hanna is not federal. | neutral |
Hanna is impartial.
Marion is not courageous.
Brice is combative.
Katrina is not cooperative.
Katrina is not courageous.
Luisa is cooperative.
Luisa is not combative.
Mark is not impartial.
Marion is not impartial.
Luisa is courageous.
Mark is not combative.
Mark is not courageous.If there is someone who is not psychological, then Hanna is not impartial.
If there is someone who is psychological, then Luisa is not combative and Hanna is courageous.
Someone is not cooperative and not impartial if and only if he is not federal and courageous.
Katrina being not combative is equivalent to Marion being psychological and Luisa being courageous.
If there is someone who is not federal, then Hanna is impartial.
If there is nobody who is not psychological, then Walter is not courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both combative and impartial, then Katrina is courageous.
All not cooperative people are not federal.
If someone is combative and not federal, then he is not impartial, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Katrina is not combative once knowing that Walter is psychological.
If there is someone who is either courageous or psychological, then Katrina is not combative and Marion is not cooperative.
If someone is not impartial, then he is not federal, and vice versa. | Mark is courageous. | contradiction |
Tobias is not adventurous.
Greyson is adventurous.
Greyson is not psychological.
Alston is adventurous.
Alston is not historical.
Brent is not dynamic.
Greyson is historical.
Brent is psychological.
Tobias is psychological.
Kimball is distracted.
Brent is not distracted.
Hunter is adventurous.Ramsey being not historical implies that Greyson is not distracted.
Alston being not dynamic implies that Brent is not joyous.
Someone who is historical is always psychological.
Someone is joyous and dynamic if and only if he is historical.
It can be concluded that Alston is adventurous and Alston is joyous once knowing that Greyson is historical and Alston is dynamic.
Someone who is eithor not psychological or not distracted is always historical.
Someone who is eithor not psychological or not distracted is always not dynamic.
If there is at least one people who is joyous or not dynamic, then Tobias is psychological.
If someone is distracted and joyous, then he is both not historical and not dynamic, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kimball is historical and Tobias is dynamic once knowing that Alston is not adventurous.
If Ramsey is joyous, then Alston is not adventurous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both adventurous and not historical, then Kimball is not psychological. | Greyson is dynamic. | self_contradiction |
Tobias is not adventurous.
Greyson is adventurous.
Greyson is not psychological.
Alston is adventurous.
Alston is not historical.
Brent is not dynamic.
Greyson is historical.
Brent is psychological.
Tobias is psychological.
Kimball is distracted.
Brent is not distracted.
Hunter is adventurous.Ramsey being not historical implies that Greyson is not distracted.
Alston being not dynamic implies that Brent is not joyous.
Someone who is historical is always psychological.
Someone is joyous and dynamic if and only if he is historical.
It can be concluded that Alston is adventurous and Alston is joyous once knowing that Greyson is historical and Alston is dynamic.
Someone who is eithor not psychological or not distracted is always historical.
Someone who is eithor not psychological or not distracted is always not dynamic.
If there is at least one people who is joyous or not dynamic, then Tobias is psychological.
If someone is distracted and joyous, then he is both not historical and not dynamic, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kimball is historical and Tobias is dynamic once knowing that Alston is not adventurous.
If Ramsey is joyous, then Alston is not adventurous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both adventurous and not historical, then Kimball is not psychological. | Alston is not psychological. | neutral |
Tobias is not adventurous.
Greyson is adventurous.
Greyson is not psychological.
Alston is adventurous.
Alston is not historical.
Brent is not dynamic.
Greyson is historical.
Brent is psychological.
Tobias is psychological.
Kimball is distracted.
Brent is not distracted.
Hunter is adventurous.Ramsey being not historical implies that Greyson is not distracted.
Alston being not dynamic implies that Brent is not joyous.
Someone who is historical is always psychological.
Someone is joyous and dynamic if and only if he is historical.
It can be concluded that Alston is adventurous and Alston is joyous once knowing that Greyson is historical and Alston is dynamic.
Someone who is eithor not psychological or not distracted is always historical.
Someone who is eithor not psychological or not distracted is always not dynamic.
If there is at least one people who is joyous or not dynamic, then Tobias is psychological.
If someone is distracted and joyous, then he is both not historical and not dynamic, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kimball is historical and Tobias is dynamic once knowing that Alston is not adventurous.
If Ramsey is joyous, then Alston is not adventurous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both adventurous and not historical, then Kimball is not psychological. | Greyson is not historical. | contradiction |
Tobias is not adventurous.
Greyson is adventurous.
Greyson is not psychological.
Alston is adventurous.
Alston is not historical.
Brent is not dynamic.
Greyson is historical.
Brent is psychological.
Tobias is psychological.
Kimball is distracted.
Brent is not distracted.
Hunter is adventurous.Ramsey being not historical implies that Greyson is not distracted.
Alston being not dynamic implies that Brent is not joyous.
Someone who is historical is always psychological.
Someone is joyous and dynamic if and only if he is historical.
It can be concluded that Alston is adventurous and Alston is joyous once knowing that Greyson is historical and Alston is dynamic.
Someone who is eithor not psychological or not distracted is always historical.
Someone who is eithor not psychological or not distracted is always not dynamic.
If there is at least one people who is joyous or not dynamic, then Tobias is psychological.
If someone is distracted and joyous, then he is both not historical and not dynamic, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kimball is historical and Tobias is dynamic once knowing that Alston is not adventurous.
If Ramsey is joyous, then Alston is not adventurous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both adventurous and not historical, then Kimball is not psychological. | Greyson is not dynamic. | self_contradiction |
Tobias is not adventurous.
Greyson is adventurous.
Greyson is not psychological.
Alston is adventurous.
Alston is not historical.
Brent is not dynamic.
Greyson is historical.
Brent is psychological.
Tobias is psychological.
Kimball is distracted.
Brent is not distracted.
Hunter is adventurous.Ramsey being not historical implies that Greyson is not distracted.
Alston being not dynamic implies that Brent is not joyous.
Someone who is historical is always psychological.
Someone is joyous and dynamic if and only if he is historical.
It can be concluded that Alston is adventurous and Alston is joyous once knowing that Greyson is historical and Alston is dynamic.
Someone who is eithor not psychological or not distracted is always historical.
Someone who is eithor not psychological or not distracted is always not dynamic.
If there is at least one people who is joyous or not dynamic, then Tobias is psychological.
If someone is distracted and joyous, then he is both not historical and not dynamic, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kimball is historical and Tobias is dynamic once knowing that Alston is not adventurous.
If Ramsey is joyous, then Alston is not adventurous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both adventurous and not historical, then Kimball is not psychological. | Tobias is adventurous. | contradiction |
Tobias is not adventurous.
Greyson is adventurous.
Greyson is not psychological.
Alston is adventurous.
Alston is not historical.
Brent is not dynamic.
Greyson is historical.
Brent is psychological.
Tobias is psychological.
Kimball is distracted.
Brent is not distracted.
Hunter is adventurous.Ramsey being not historical implies that Greyson is not distracted.
Alston being not dynamic implies that Brent is not joyous.
Someone who is historical is always psychological.
Someone is joyous and dynamic if and only if he is historical.
It can be concluded that Alston is adventurous and Alston is joyous once knowing that Greyson is historical and Alston is dynamic.
Someone who is eithor not psychological or not distracted is always historical.
Someone who is eithor not psychological or not distracted is always not dynamic.
If there is at least one people who is joyous or not dynamic, then Tobias is psychological.
If someone is distracted and joyous, then he is both not historical and not dynamic, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kimball is historical and Tobias is dynamic once knowing that Alston is not adventurous.
If Ramsey is joyous, then Alston is not adventurous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both adventurous and not historical, then Kimball is not psychological. | Hunter is historical. | neutral |
Tobias is not adventurous.
Greyson is adventurous.
Greyson is not psychological.
Alston is adventurous.
Alston is not historical.
Brent is not dynamic.
Greyson is historical.
Brent is psychological.
Tobias is psychological.
Kimball is distracted.
Brent is not distracted.
Hunter is adventurous.Ramsey being not historical implies that Greyson is not distracted.
Alston being not dynamic implies that Brent is not joyous.
Someone who is historical is always psychological.
Someone is joyous and dynamic if and only if he is historical.
It can be concluded that Alston is adventurous and Alston is joyous once knowing that Greyson is historical and Alston is dynamic.
Someone who is eithor not psychological or not distracted is always historical.
Someone who is eithor not psychological or not distracted is always not dynamic.
If there is at least one people who is joyous or not dynamic, then Tobias is psychological.
If someone is distracted and joyous, then he is both not historical and not dynamic, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kimball is historical and Tobias is dynamic once knowing that Alston is not adventurous.
If Ramsey is joyous, then Alston is not adventurous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both adventurous and not historical, then Kimball is not psychological. | Brent is dynamic. | self_contradiction |
Tobias is not adventurous.
Greyson is adventurous.
Greyson is not psychological.
Alston is adventurous.
Alston is not historical.
Brent is not dynamic.
Greyson is historical.
Brent is psychological.
Tobias is psychological.
Kimball is distracted.
Brent is not distracted.
Hunter is adventurous.Ramsey being not historical implies that Greyson is not distracted.
Alston being not dynamic implies that Brent is not joyous.
Someone who is historical is always psychological.
Someone is joyous and dynamic if and only if he is historical.
It can be concluded that Alston is adventurous and Alston is joyous once knowing that Greyson is historical and Alston is dynamic.
Someone who is eithor not psychological or not distracted is always historical.
Someone who is eithor not psychological or not distracted is always not dynamic.
If there is at least one people who is joyous or not dynamic, then Tobias is psychological.
If someone is distracted and joyous, then he is both not historical and not dynamic, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kimball is historical and Tobias is dynamic once knowing that Alston is not adventurous.
If Ramsey is joyous, then Alston is not adventurous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both adventurous and not historical, then Kimball is not psychological. | Tobias is not psychological. | contradiction |
Tobias is not adventurous.
Greyson is adventurous.
Greyson is not psychological.
Alston is adventurous.
Alston is not historical.
Brent is not dynamic.
Greyson is historical.
Brent is psychological.
Tobias is psychological.
Kimball is distracted.
Brent is not distracted.
Hunter is adventurous.Ramsey being not historical implies that Greyson is not distracted.
Alston being not dynamic implies that Brent is not joyous.
Someone who is historical is always psychological.
Someone is joyous and dynamic if and only if he is historical.
It can be concluded that Alston is adventurous and Alston is joyous once knowing that Greyson is historical and Alston is dynamic.
Someone who is eithor not psychological or not distracted is always historical.
Someone who is eithor not psychological or not distracted is always not dynamic.
If there is at least one people who is joyous or not dynamic, then Tobias is psychological.
If someone is distracted and joyous, then he is both not historical and not dynamic, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kimball is historical and Tobias is dynamic once knowing that Alston is not adventurous.
If Ramsey is joyous, then Alston is not adventurous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both adventurous and not historical, then Kimball is not psychological. | Greyson is not psychological. | self_contradiction |
Tobias is not adventurous.
Greyson is adventurous.
Greyson is not psychological.
Alston is adventurous.
Alston is not historical.
Brent is not dynamic.
Greyson is historical.
Brent is psychological.
Tobias is psychological.
Kimball is distracted.
Brent is not distracted.
Hunter is adventurous.Ramsey being not historical implies that Greyson is not distracted.
Alston being not dynamic implies that Brent is not joyous.
Someone who is historical is always psychological.
Someone is joyous and dynamic if and only if he is historical.
It can be concluded that Alston is adventurous and Alston is joyous once knowing that Greyson is historical and Alston is dynamic.
Someone who is eithor not psychological or not distracted is always historical.
Someone who is eithor not psychological or not distracted is always not dynamic.
If there is at least one people who is joyous or not dynamic, then Tobias is psychological.
If someone is distracted and joyous, then he is both not historical and not dynamic, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kimball is historical and Tobias is dynamic once knowing that Alston is not adventurous.
If Ramsey is joyous, then Alston is not adventurous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both adventurous and not historical, then Kimball is not psychological. | Kimball is adventurous. | neutral |
Tobias is not adventurous.
Greyson is adventurous.
Greyson is not psychological.
Alston is adventurous.
Alston is not historical.
Brent is not dynamic.
Greyson is historical.
Brent is psychological.
Tobias is psychological.
Kimball is distracted.
Brent is not distracted.
Hunter is adventurous.Ramsey being not historical implies that Greyson is not distracted.
Alston being not dynamic implies that Brent is not joyous.
Someone who is historical is always psychological.
Someone is joyous and dynamic if and only if he is historical.
It can be concluded that Alston is adventurous and Alston is joyous once knowing that Greyson is historical and Alston is dynamic.
Someone who is eithor not psychological or not distracted is always historical.
Someone who is eithor not psychological or not distracted is always not dynamic.
If there is at least one people who is joyous or not dynamic, then Tobias is psychological.
If someone is distracted and joyous, then he is both not historical and not dynamic, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kimball is historical and Tobias is dynamic once knowing that Alston is not adventurous.
If Ramsey is joyous, then Alston is not adventurous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both adventurous and not historical, then Kimball is not psychological. | Alston is not adventurous. | contradiction |
Tobias is not adventurous.
Greyson is adventurous.
Greyson is not psychological.
Alston is adventurous.
Alston is not historical.
Brent is not dynamic.
Greyson is historical.
Brent is psychological.
Tobias is psychological.
Kimball is distracted.
Brent is not distracted.
Hunter is adventurous.Ramsey being not historical implies that Greyson is not distracted.
Alston being not dynamic implies that Brent is not joyous.
Someone who is historical is always psychological.
Someone is joyous and dynamic if and only if he is historical.
It can be concluded that Alston is adventurous and Alston is joyous once knowing that Greyson is historical and Alston is dynamic.
Someone who is eithor not psychological or not distracted is always historical.
Someone who is eithor not psychological or not distracted is always not dynamic.
If there is at least one people who is joyous or not dynamic, then Tobias is psychological.
If someone is distracted and joyous, then he is both not historical and not dynamic, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kimball is historical and Tobias is dynamic once knowing that Alston is not adventurous.
If Ramsey is joyous, then Alston is not adventurous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both adventurous and not historical, then Kimball is not psychological. | Tobias is not adventurous. | entailment |
Tobias is not adventurous.
Greyson is adventurous.
Greyson is not psychological.
Alston is adventurous.
Alston is not historical.
Brent is not dynamic.
Greyson is historical.
Brent is psychological.
Tobias is psychological.
Kimball is distracted.
Brent is not distracted.
Hunter is adventurous.Ramsey being not historical implies that Greyson is not distracted.
Alston being not dynamic implies that Brent is not joyous.
Someone who is historical is always psychological.
Someone is joyous and dynamic if and only if he is historical.
It can be concluded that Alston is adventurous and Alston is joyous once knowing that Greyson is historical and Alston is dynamic.
Someone who is eithor not psychological or not distracted is always historical.
Someone who is eithor not psychological or not distracted is always not dynamic.
If there is at least one people who is joyous or not dynamic, then Tobias is psychological.
If someone is distracted and joyous, then he is both not historical and not dynamic, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kimball is historical and Tobias is dynamic once knowing that Alston is not adventurous.
If Ramsey is joyous, then Alston is not adventurous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both adventurous and not historical, then Kimball is not psychological. | Hunter is not dynamic. | neutral |
Tobias is not adventurous.
Greyson is adventurous.
Greyson is not psychological.
Alston is adventurous.
Alston is not historical.
Brent is not dynamic.
Greyson is historical.
Brent is psychological.
Tobias is psychological.
Kimball is distracted.
Brent is not distracted.
Hunter is adventurous.Ramsey being not historical implies that Greyson is not distracted.
Alston being not dynamic implies that Brent is not joyous.
Someone who is historical is always psychological.
Someone is joyous and dynamic if and only if he is historical.
It can be concluded that Alston is adventurous and Alston is joyous once knowing that Greyson is historical and Alston is dynamic.
Someone who is eithor not psychological or not distracted is always historical.
Someone who is eithor not psychological or not distracted is always not dynamic.
If there is at least one people who is joyous or not dynamic, then Tobias is psychological.
If someone is distracted and joyous, then he is both not historical and not dynamic, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kimball is historical and Tobias is dynamic once knowing that Alston is not adventurous.
If Ramsey is joyous, then Alston is not adventurous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both adventurous and not historical, then Kimball is not psychological. | Brent is not distracted. | entailment |
Tobias is not adventurous.
Greyson is adventurous.
Greyson is not psychological.
Alston is adventurous.
Alston is not historical.
Brent is not dynamic.
Greyson is historical.
Brent is psychological.
Tobias is psychological.
Kimball is distracted.
Brent is not distracted.
Hunter is adventurous.Ramsey being not historical implies that Greyson is not distracted.
Alston being not dynamic implies that Brent is not joyous.
Someone who is historical is always psychological.
Someone is joyous and dynamic if and only if he is historical.
It can be concluded that Alston is adventurous and Alston is joyous once knowing that Greyson is historical and Alston is dynamic.
Someone who is eithor not psychological or not distracted is always historical.
Someone who is eithor not psychological or not distracted is always not dynamic.
If there is at least one people who is joyous or not dynamic, then Tobias is psychological.
If someone is distracted and joyous, then he is both not historical and not dynamic, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kimball is historical and Tobias is dynamic once knowing that Alston is not adventurous.
If Ramsey is joyous, then Alston is not adventurous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both adventurous and not historical, then Kimball is not psychological. | Hunter is not distracted. | neutral |
Tobias is not adventurous.
Greyson is adventurous.
Greyson is not psychological.
Alston is adventurous.
Alston is not historical.
Brent is not dynamic.
Greyson is historical.
Brent is psychological.
Tobias is psychological.
Kimball is distracted.
Brent is not distracted.
Hunter is adventurous.Ramsey being not historical implies that Greyson is not distracted.
Alston being not dynamic implies that Brent is not joyous.
Someone who is historical is always psychological.
Someone is joyous and dynamic if and only if he is historical.
It can be concluded that Alston is adventurous and Alston is joyous once knowing that Greyson is historical and Alston is dynamic.
Someone who is eithor not psychological or not distracted is always historical.
Someone who is eithor not psychological or not distracted is always not dynamic.
If there is at least one people who is joyous or not dynamic, then Tobias is psychological.
If someone is distracted and joyous, then he is both not historical and not dynamic, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kimball is historical and Tobias is dynamic once knowing that Alston is not adventurous.
If Ramsey is joyous, then Alston is not adventurous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both adventurous and not historical, then Kimball is not psychological. | Kimball is distracted. | entailment |
Tobias is not adventurous.
Greyson is adventurous.
Greyson is not psychological.
Alston is adventurous.
Alston is not historical.
Brent is not dynamic.
Greyson is historical.
Brent is psychological.
Tobias is psychological.
Kimball is distracted.
Brent is not distracted.
Hunter is adventurous.Ramsey being not historical implies that Greyson is not distracted.
Alston being not dynamic implies that Brent is not joyous.
Someone who is historical is always psychological.
Someone is joyous and dynamic if and only if he is historical.
It can be concluded that Alston is adventurous and Alston is joyous once knowing that Greyson is historical and Alston is dynamic.
Someone who is eithor not psychological or not distracted is always historical.
Someone who is eithor not psychological or not distracted is always not dynamic.
If there is at least one people who is joyous or not dynamic, then Tobias is psychological.
If someone is distracted and joyous, then he is both not historical and not dynamic, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kimball is historical and Tobias is dynamic once knowing that Alston is not adventurous.
If Ramsey is joyous, then Alston is not adventurous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both adventurous and not historical, then Kimball is not psychological. | Greyson is not joyous. | contradiction |
Tobias is not adventurous.
Greyson is adventurous.
Greyson is not psychological.
Alston is adventurous.
Alston is not historical.
Brent is not dynamic.
Greyson is historical.
Brent is psychological.
Tobias is psychological.
Kimball is distracted.
Brent is not distracted.
Hunter is adventurous.Ramsey being not historical implies that Greyson is not distracted.
Alston being not dynamic implies that Brent is not joyous.
Someone who is historical is always psychological.
Someone is joyous and dynamic if and only if he is historical.
It can be concluded that Alston is adventurous and Alston is joyous once knowing that Greyson is historical and Alston is dynamic.
Someone who is eithor not psychological or not distracted is always historical.
Someone who is eithor not psychological or not distracted is always not dynamic.
If there is at least one people who is joyous or not dynamic, then Tobias is psychological.
If someone is distracted and joyous, then he is both not historical and not dynamic, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kimball is historical and Tobias is dynamic once knowing that Alston is not adventurous.
If Ramsey is joyous, then Alston is not adventurous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both adventurous and not historical, then Kimball is not psychological. | Tobias is psychological. | entailment |
Tobias is not adventurous.
Greyson is adventurous.
Greyson is not psychological.
Alston is adventurous.
Alston is not historical.
Brent is not dynamic.
Greyson is historical.
Brent is psychological.
Tobias is psychological.
Kimball is distracted.
Brent is not distracted.
Hunter is adventurous.Ramsey being not historical implies that Greyson is not distracted.
Alston being not dynamic implies that Brent is not joyous.
Someone who is historical is always psychological.
Someone is joyous and dynamic if and only if he is historical.
It can be concluded that Alston is adventurous and Alston is joyous once knowing that Greyson is historical and Alston is dynamic.
Someone who is eithor not psychological or not distracted is always historical.
Someone who is eithor not psychological or not distracted is always not dynamic.
If there is at least one people who is joyous or not dynamic, then Tobias is psychological.
If someone is distracted and joyous, then he is both not historical and not dynamic, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kimball is historical and Tobias is dynamic once knowing that Alston is not adventurous.
If Ramsey is joyous, then Alston is not adventurous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both adventurous and not historical, then Kimball is not psychological. | Greyson is psychological. | self_contradiction |
Tobias is not adventurous.
Greyson is adventurous.
Greyson is not psychological.
Alston is adventurous.
Alston is not historical.
Brent is not dynamic.
Greyson is historical.
Brent is psychological.
Tobias is psychological.
Kimball is distracted.
Brent is not distracted.
Hunter is adventurous.Ramsey being not historical implies that Greyson is not distracted.
Alston being not dynamic implies that Brent is not joyous.
Someone who is historical is always psychological.
Someone is joyous and dynamic if and only if he is historical.
It can be concluded that Alston is adventurous and Alston is joyous once knowing that Greyson is historical and Alston is dynamic.
Someone who is eithor not psychological or not distracted is always historical.
Someone who is eithor not psychological or not distracted is always not dynamic.
If there is at least one people who is joyous or not dynamic, then Tobias is psychological.
If someone is distracted and joyous, then he is both not historical and not dynamic, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kimball is historical and Tobias is dynamic once knowing that Alston is not adventurous.
If Ramsey is joyous, then Alston is not adventurous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both adventurous and not historical, then Kimball is not psychological. | Greyson is joyous. | entailment |
Kerwin is massive.
Jason is strict.
Marlon is massive.
Gale is not massive.
Kerwin is not crazy.
Brooke is tall.
Marlon is warm-hearted.
Kerwin is not strict.
Kerwin is not tall.
Jason is not massive.
Brooke is not massive.
Brooke is not warm-hearted.As long as someone is not massive, he is small and warm-hearted.
If there is at least one people who is strict, then Shelley is small and Kerwin is not massive.
Gale being tall implies that Marlon is small.
If someone is not strict or warm-hearted, then he is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not massive and strict, then Harley is crazy.
If there is someone who is both warm-hearted and massive, then Harley is not crazy.
if there is at least one people who is not tall and not small, then Marlon is strict and Kerwin is massive.
Someone who is warm-hearted and small is always not crazy and not tall.
All tall people are massive.
If there is at least one people who is not tall or warm-hearted, then Shelley is not small.
If someone is warm-hearted and crazy, then he is not strict, and vice versa.
Shelley being not tall implies that Marlon is not small and Shelley is not massive. | Gale is small. | entailment |
Kerwin is massive.
Jason is strict.
Marlon is massive.
Gale is not massive.
Kerwin is not crazy.
Brooke is tall.
Marlon is warm-hearted.
Kerwin is not strict.
Kerwin is not tall.
Jason is not massive.
Brooke is not massive.
Brooke is not warm-hearted.As long as someone is not massive, he is small and warm-hearted.
If there is at least one people who is strict, then Shelley is small and Kerwin is not massive.
Gale being tall implies that Marlon is small.
If someone is not strict or warm-hearted, then he is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not massive and strict, then Harley is crazy.
If there is someone who is both warm-hearted and massive, then Harley is not crazy.
if there is at least one people who is not tall and not small, then Marlon is strict and Kerwin is massive.
Someone who is warm-hearted and small is always not crazy and not tall.
All tall people are massive.
If there is at least one people who is not tall or warm-hearted, then Shelley is not small.
If someone is warm-hearted and crazy, then he is not strict, and vice versa.
Shelley being not tall implies that Marlon is not small and Shelley is not massive. | Jason is not tall. | entailment |
Kerwin is massive.
Jason is strict.
Marlon is massive.
Gale is not massive.
Kerwin is not crazy.
Brooke is tall.
Marlon is warm-hearted.
Kerwin is not strict.
Kerwin is not tall.
Jason is not massive.
Brooke is not massive.
Brooke is not warm-hearted.As long as someone is not massive, he is small and warm-hearted.
If there is at least one people who is strict, then Shelley is small and Kerwin is not massive.
Gale being tall implies that Marlon is small.
If someone is not strict or warm-hearted, then he is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not massive and strict, then Harley is crazy.
If there is someone who is both warm-hearted and massive, then Harley is not crazy.
if there is at least one people who is not tall and not small, then Marlon is strict and Kerwin is massive.
Someone who is warm-hearted and small is always not crazy and not tall.
All tall people are massive.
If there is at least one people who is not tall or warm-hearted, then Shelley is not small.
If someone is warm-hearted and crazy, then he is not strict, and vice versa.
Shelley being not tall implies that Marlon is not small and Shelley is not massive. | Gale is crazy. | contradiction |
Kerwin is massive.
Jason is strict.
Marlon is massive.
Gale is not massive.
Kerwin is not crazy.
Brooke is tall.
Marlon is warm-hearted.
Kerwin is not strict.
Kerwin is not tall.
Jason is not massive.
Brooke is not massive.
Brooke is not warm-hearted.As long as someone is not massive, he is small and warm-hearted.
If there is at least one people who is strict, then Shelley is small and Kerwin is not massive.
Gale being tall implies that Marlon is small.
If someone is not strict or warm-hearted, then he is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not massive and strict, then Harley is crazy.
If there is someone who is both warm-hearted and massive, then Harley is not crazy.
if there is at least one people who is not tall and not small, then Marlon is strict and Kerwin is massive.
Someone who is warm-hearted and small is always not crazy and not tall.
All tall people are massive.
If there is at least one people who is not tall or warm-hearted, then Shelley is not small.
If someone is warm-hearted and crazy, then he is not strict, and vice versa.
Shelley being not tall implies that Marlon is not small and Shelley is not massive. | Harley is massive. | neutral |
Kerwin is massive.
Jason is strict.
Marlon is massive.
Gale is not massive.
Kerwin is not crazy.
Brooke is tall.
Marlon is warm-hearted.
Kerwin is not strict.
Kerwin is not tall.
Jason is not massive.
Brooke is not massive.
Brooke is not warm-hearted.As long as someone is not massive, he is small and warm-hearted.
If there is at least one people who is strict, then Shelley is small and Kerwin is not massive.
Gale being tall implies that Marlon is small.
If someone is not strict or warm-hearted, then he is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not massive and strict, then Harley is crazy.
If there is someone who is both warm-hearted and massive, then Harley is not crazy.
if there is at least one people who is not tall and not small, then Marlon is strict and Kerwin is massive.
Someone who is warm-hearted and small is always not crazy and not tall.
All tall people are massive.
If there is at least one people who is not tall or warm-hearted, then Shelley is not small.
If someone is warm-hearted and crazy, then he is not strict, and vice versa.
Shelley being not tall implies that Marlon is not small and Shelley is not massive. | Marlon is massive. | self_contradiction |
Kerwin is massive.
Jason is strict.
Marlon is massive.
Gale is not massive.
Kerwin is not crazy.
Brooke is tall.
Marlon is warm-hearted.
Kerwin is not strict.
Kerwin is not tall.
Jason is not massive.
Brooke is not massive.
Brooke is not warm-hearted.As long as someone is not massive, he is small and warm-hearted.
If there is at least one people who is strict, then Shelley is small and Kerwin is not massive.
Gale being tall implies that Marlon is small.
If someone is not strict or warm-hearted, then he is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not massive and strict, then Harley is crazy.
If there is someone who is both warm-hearted and massive, then Harley is not crazy.
if there is at least one people who is not tall and not small, then Marlon is strict and Kerwin is massive.
Someone who is warm-hearted and small is always not crazy and not tall.
All tall people are massive.
If there is at least one people who is not tall or warm-hearted, then Shelley is not small.
If someone is warm-hearted and crazy, then he is not strict, and vice versa.
Shelley being not tall implies that Marlon is not small and Shelley is not massive. | Brooke is crazy. | contradiction |
Kerwin is massive.
Jason is strict.
Marlon is massive.
Gale is not massive.
Kerwin is not crazy.
Brooke is tall.
Marlon is warm-hearted.
Kerwin is not strict.
Kerwin is not tall.
Jason is not massive.
Brooke is not massive.
Brooke is not warm-hearted.As long as someone is not massive, he is small and warm-hearted.
If there is at least one people who is strict, then Shelley is small and Kerwin is not massive.
Gale being tall implies that Marlon is small.
If someone is not strict or warm-hearted, then he is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not massive and strict, then Harley is crazy.
If there is someone who is both warm-hearted and massive, then Harley is not crazy.
if there is at least one people who is not tall and not small, then Marlon is strict and Kerwin is massive.
Someone who is warm-hearted and small is always not crazy and not tall.
All tall people are massive.
If there is at least one people who is not tall or warm-hearted, then Shelley is not small.
If someone is warm-hearted and crazy, then he is not strict, and vice versa.
Shelley being not tall implies that Marlon is not small and Shelley is not massive. | Gale is not strict. | neutral |
Kerwin is massive.
Jason is strict.
Marlon is massive.
Gale is not massive.
Kerwin is not crazy.
Brooke is tall.
Marlon is warm-hearted.
Kerwin is not strict.
Kerwin is not tall.
Jason is not massive.
Brooke is not massive.
Brooke is not warm-hearted.As long as someone is not massive, he is small and warm-hearted.
If there is at least one people who is strict, then Shelley is small and Kerwin is not massive.
Gale being tall implies that Marlon is small.
If someone is not strict or warm-hearted, then he is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not massive and strict, then Harley is crazy.
If there is someone who is both warm-hearted and massive, then Harley is not crazy.
if there is at least one people who is not tall and not small, then Marlon is strict and Kerwin is massive.
Someone who is warm-hearted and small is always not crazy and not tall.
All tall people are massive.
If there is at least one people who is not tall or warm-hearted, then Shelley is not small.
If someone is warm-hearted and crazy, then he is not strict, and vice versa.
Shelley being not tall implies that Marlon is not small and Shelley is not massive. | Brooke is not small. | contradiction |
Kerwin is massive.
Jason is strict.
Marlon is massive.
Gale is not massive.
Kerwin is not crazy.
Brooke is tall.
Marlon is warm-hearted.
Kerwin is not strict.
Kerwin is not tall.
Jason is not massive.
Brooke is not massive.
Brooke is not warm-hearted.As long as someone is not massive, he is small and warm-hearted.
If there is at least one people who is strict, then Shelley is small and Kerwin is not massive.
Gale being tall implies that Marlon is small.
If someone is not strict or warm-hearted, then he is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not massive and strict, then Harley is crazy.
If there is someone who is both warm-hearted and massive, then Harley is not crazy.
if there is at least one people who is not tall and not small, then Marlon is strict and Kerwin is massive.
Someone who is warm-hearted and small is always not crazy and not tall.
All tall people are massive.
If there is at least one people who is not tall or warm-hearted, then Shelley is not small.
If someone is warm-hearted and crazy, then he is not strict, and vice versa.
Shelley being not tall implies that Marlon is not small and Shelley is not massive. | Shelley is not small. | self_contradiction |
Kerwin is massive.
Jason is strict.
Marlon is massive.
Gale is not massive.
Kerwin is not crazy.
Brooke is tall.
Marlon is warm-hearted.
Kerwin is not strict.
Kerwin is not tall.
Jason is not massive.
Brooke is not massive.
Brooke is not warm-hearted.As long as someone is not massive, he is small and warm-hearted.
If there is at least one people who is strict, then Shelley is small and Kerwin is not massive.
Gale being tall implies that Marlon is small.
If someone is not strict or warm-hearted, then he is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not massive and strict, then Harley is crazy.
If there is someone who is both warm-hearted and massive, then Harley is not crazy.
if there is at least one people who is not tall and not small, then Marlon is strict and Kerwin is massive.
Someone who is warm-hearted and small is always not crazy and not tall.
All tall people are massive.
If there is at least one people who is not tall or warm-hearted, then Shelley is not small.
If someone is warm-hearted and crazy, then he is not strict, and vice versa.
Shelley being not tall implies that Marlon is not small and Shelley is not massive. | Jason is strict. | entailment |
Kerwin is massive.
Jason is strict.
Marlon is massive.
Gale is not massive.
Kerwin is not crazy.
Brooke is tall.
Marlon is warm-hearted.
Kerwin is not strict.
Kerwin is not tall.
Jason is not massive.
Brooke is not massive.
Brooke is not warm-hearted.As long as someone is not massive, he is small and warm-hearted.
If there is at least one people who is strict, then Shelley is small and Kerwin is not massive.
Gale being tall implies that Marlon is small.
If someone is not strict or warm-hearted, then he is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not massive and strict, then Harley is crazy.
If there is someone who is both warm-hearted and massive, then Harley is not crazy.
if there is at least one people who is not tall and not small, then Marlon is strict and Kerwin is massive.
Someone who is warm-hearted and small is always not crazy and not tall.
All tall people are massive.
If there is at least one people who is not tall or warm-hearted, then Shelley is not small.
If someone is warm-hearted and crazy, then he is not strict, and vice versa.
Shelley being not tall implies that Marlon is not small and Shelley is not massive. | Gale is warm-hearted. | entailment |
Kerwin is massive.
Jason is strict.
Marlon is massive.
Gale is not massive.
Kerwin is not crazy.
Brooke is tall.
Marlon is warm-hearted.
Kerwin is not strict.
Kerwin is not tall.
Jason is not massive.
Brooke is not massive.
Brooke is not warm-hearted.As long as someone is not massive, he is small and warm-hearted.
If there is at least one people who is strict, then Shelley is small and Kerwin is not massive.
Gale being tall implies that Marlon is small.
If someone is not strict or warm-hearted, then he is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not massive and strict, then Harley is crazy.
If there is someone who is both warm-hearted and massive, then Harley is not crazy.
if there is at least one people who is not tall and not small, then Marlon is strict and Kerwin is massive.
Someone who is warm-hearted and small is always not crazy and not tall.
All tall people are massive.
If there is at least one people who is not tall or warm-hearted, then Shelley is not small.
If someone is warm-hearted and crazy, then he is not strict, and vice versa.
Shelley being not tall implies that Marlon is not small and Shelley is not massive. | Shelley is small. | self_contradiction |
Kerwin is massive.
Jason is strict.
Marlon is massive.
Gale is not massive.
Kerwin is not crazy.
Brooke is tall.
Marlon is warm-hearted.
Kerwin is not strict.
Kerwin is not tall.
Jason is not massive.
Brooke is not massive.
Brooke is not warm-hearted.As long as someone is not massive, he is small and warm-hearted.
If there is at least one people who is strict, then Shelley is small and Kerwin is not massive.
Gale being tall implies that Marlon is small.
If someone is not strict or warm-hearted, then he is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not massive and strict, then Harley is crazy.
If there is someone who is both warm-hearted and massive, then Harley is not crazy.
if there is at least one people who is not tall and not small, then Marlon is strict and Kerwin is massive.
Someone who is warm-hearted and small is always not crazy and not tall.
All tall people are massive.
If there is at least one people who is not tall or warm-hearted, then Shelley is not small.
If someone is warm-hearted and crazy, then he is not strict, and vice versa.
Shelley being not tall implies that Marlon is not small and Shelley is not massive. | Jason is not small. | contradiction |
Kerwin is massive.
Jason is strict.
Marlon is massive.
Gale is not massive.
Kerwin is not crazy.
Brooke is tall.
Marlon is warm-hearted.
Kerwin is not strict.
Kerwin is not tall.
Jason is not massive.
Brooke is not massive.
Brooke is not warm-hearted.As long as someone is not massive, he is small and warm-hearted.
If there is at least one people who is strict, then Shelley is small and Kerwin is not massive.
Gale being tall implies that Marlon is small.
If someone is not strict or warm-hearted, then he is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not massive and strict, then Harley is crazy.
If there is someone who is both warm-hearted and massive, then Harley is not crazy.
if there is at least one people who is not tall and not small, then Marlon is strict and Kerwin is massive.
Someone who is warm-hearted and small is always not crazy and not tall.
All tall people are massive.
If there is at least one people who is not tall or warm-hearted, then Shelley is not small.
If someone is warm-hearted and crazy, then he is not strict, and vice versa.
Shelley being not tall implies that Marlon is not small and Shelley is not massive. | Brooke is massive. | self_contradiction |
Kerwin is massive.
Jason is strict.
Marlon is massive.
Gale is not massive.
Kerwin is not crazy.
Brooke is tall.
Marlon is warm-hearted.
Kerwin is not strict.
Kerwin is not tall.
Jason is not massive.
Brooke is not massive.
Brooke is not warm-hearted.As long as someone is not massive, he is small and warm-hearted.
If there is at least one people who is strict, then Shelley is small and Kerwin is not massive.
Gale being tall implies that Marlon is small.
If someone is not strict or warm-hearted, then he is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not massive and strict, then Harley is crazy.
If there is someone who is both warm-hearted and massive, then Harley is not crazy.
if there is at least one people who is not tall and not small, then Marlon is strict and Kerwin is massive.
Someone who is warm-hearted and small is always not crazy and not tall.
All tall people are massive.
If there is at least one people who is not tall or warm-hearted, then Shelley is not small.
If someone is warm-hearted and crazy, then he is not strict, and vice versa.
Shelley being not tall implies that Marlon is not small and Shelley is not massive. | Kerwin is not strict. | entailment |
Kerwin is massive.
Jason is strict.
Marlon is massive.
Gale is not massive.
Kerwin is not crazy.
Brooke is tall.
Marlon is warm-hearted.
Kerwin is not strict.
Kerwin is not tall.
Jason is not massive.
Brooke is not massive.
Brooke is not warm-hearted.As long as someone is not massive, he is small and warm-hearted.
If there is at least one people who is strict, then Shelley is small and Kerwin is not massive.
Gale being tall implies that Marlon is small.
If someone is not strict or warm-hearted, then he is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not massive and strict, then Harley is crazy.
If there is someone who is both warm-hearted and massive, then Harley is not crazy.
if there is at least one people who is not tall and not small, then Marlon is strict and Kerwin is massive.
Someone who is warm-hearted and small is always not crazy and not tall.
All tall people are massive.
If there is at least one people who is not tall or warm-hearted, then Shelley is not small.
If someone is warm-hearted and crazy, then he is not strict, and vice versa.
Shelley being not tall implies that Marlon is not small and Shelley is not massive. | Harley is tall. | neutral |
Kerwin is massive.
Jason is strict.
Marlon is massive.
Gale is not massive.
Kerwin is not crazy.
Brooke is tall.
Marlon is warm-hearted.
Kerwin is not strict.
Kerwin is not tall.
Jason is not massive.
Brooke is not massive.
Brooke is not warm-hearted.As long as someone is not massive, he is small and warm-hearted.
If there is at least one people who is strict, then Shelley is small and Kerwin is not massive.
Gale being tall implies that Marlon is small.
If someone is not strict or warm-hearted, then he is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not massive and strict, then Harley is crazy.
If there is someone who is both warm-hearted and massive, then Harley is not crazy.
if there is at least one people who is not tall and not small, then Marlon is strict and Kerwin is massive.
Someone who is warm-hearted and small is always not crazy and not tall.
All tall people are massive.
If there is at least one people who is not tall or warm-hearted, then Shelley is not small.
If someone is warm-hearted and crazy, then he is not strict, and vice versa.
Shelley being not tall implies that Marlon is not small and Shelley is not massive. | Brooke is not warm-hearted. | self_contradiction |
Kerwin is massive.
Jason is strict.
Marlon is massive.
Gale is not massive.
Kerwin is not crazy.
Brooke is tall.
Marlon is warm-hearted.
Kerwin is not strict.
Kerwin is not tall.
Jason is not massive.
Brooke is not massive.
Brooke is not warm-hearted.As long as someone is not massive, he is small and warm-hearted.
If there is at least one people who is strict, then Shelley is small and Kerwin is not massive.
Gale being tall implies that Marlon is small.
If someone is not strict or warm-hearted, then he is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not massive and strict, then Harley is crazy.
If there is someone who is both warm-hearted and massive, then Harley is not crazy.
if there is at least one people who is not tall and not small, then Marlon is strict and Kerwin is massive.
Someone who is warm-hearted and small is always not crazy and not tall.
All tall people are massive.
If there is at least one people who is not tall or warm-hearted, then Shelley is not small.
If someone is warm-hearted and crazy, then he is not strict, and vice versa.
Shelley being not tall implies that Marlon is not small and Shelley is not massive. | Shelley is not tall. | neutral |
Kerwin is massive.
Jason is strict.
Marlon is massive.
Gale is not massive.
Kerwin is not crazy.
Brooke is tall.
Marlon is warm-hearted.
Kerwin is not strict.
Kerwin is not tall.
Jason is not massive.
Brooke is not massive.
Brooke is not warm-hearted.As long as someone is not massive, he is small and warm-hearted.
If there is at least one people who is strict, then Shelley is small and Kerwin is not massive.
Gale being tall implies that Marlon is small.
If someone is not strict or warm-hearted, then he is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not massive and strict, then Harley is crazy.
If there is someone who is both warm-hearted and massive, then Harley is not crazy.
if there is at least one people who is not tall and not small, then Marlon is strict and Kerwin is massive.
Someone who is warm-hearted and small is always not crazy and not tall.
All tall people are massive.
If there is at least one people who is not tall or warm-hearted, then Shelley is not small.
If someone is warm-hearted and crazy, then he is not strict, and vice versa.
Shelley being not tall implies that Marlon is not small and Shelley is not massive. | Marlon is not warm-hearted. | contradiction |
Kerwin is massive.
Jason is strict.
Marlon is massive.
Gale is not massive.
Kerwin is not crazy.
Brooke is tall.
Marlon is warm-hearted.
Kerwin is not strict.
Kerwin is not tall.
Jason is not massive.
Brooke is not massive.
Brooke is not warm-hearted.As long as someone is not massive, he is small and warm-hearted.
If there is at least one people who is strict, then Shelley is small and Kerwin is not massive.
Gale being tall implies that Marlon is small.
If someone is not strict or warm-hearted, then he is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not massive and strict, then Harley is crazy.
If there is someone who is both warm-hearted and massive, then Harley is not crazy.
if there is at least one people who is not tall and not small, then Marlon is strict and Kerwin is massive.
Someone who is warm-hearted and small is always not crazy and not tall.
All tall people are massive.
If there is at least one people who is not tall or warm-hearted, then Shelley is not small.
If someone is warm-hearted and crazy, then he is not strict, and vice versa.
Shelley being not tall implies that Marlon is not small and Shelley is not massive. | Brooke is not strict. | neutral |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.