premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Royce is not untidy.
Norris is not untidy.
Clifford is not oak.
Chalmers is not horrible.
Alston is environmental.
Clifford is untidy.
Gilbert is untidy.
Royce is environmental.
Chalmers is unsightly.
Royce is unsightly.
Grayson is not tough.
Royce is oak.Someone who is unsightly is always both untidy and environmental.
If all people are untidy, then Royce is not horrible.
If someone is not untidy or he is tough, then he is horrible.
Chalmers being environmental and Grayson being untidy imply that Grayson is tough.
If Royce is not oak or Alston is tough, then Clifford is horrible.
If there is someone who is not tough, then Alston is not unsightly.
If everyone is not oak or not untidy, then Royce is horrible.
If there is at least one people who is both not horrible and tough, then Alston is environmental.
Gilbert being environmental is equivalent to Clifford being not unsightly and Chalmers being tough.
Someone being both untidy and horrible is equivalent to being not oak and not unsightly.
It can be concluded that Alston is oak and Chalmers is horrible once knowing that Grayson is tough.
If there is at least one people who is environmental, then Alston is tough. | Clifford is horrible. | entailment |
Royce is not untidy.
Norris is not untidy.
Clifford is not oak.
Chalmers is not horrible.
Alston is environmental.
Clifford is untidy.
Gilbert is untidy.
Royce is environmental.
Chalmers is unsightly.
Royce is unsightly.
Grayson is not tough.
Royce is oak.Someone who is unsightly is always both untidy and environmental.
If all people are untidy, then Royce is not horrible.
If someone is not untidy or he is tough, then he is horrible.
Chalmers being environmental and Grayson being untidy imply that Grayson is tough.
If Royce is not oak or Alston is tough, then Clifford is horrible.
If there is someone who is not tough, then Alston is not unsightly.
If everyone is not oak or not untidy, then Royce is horrible.
If there is at least one people who is both not horrible and tough, then Alston is environmental.
Gilbert being environmental is equivalent to Clifford being not unsightly and Chalmers being tough.
Someone being both untidy and horrible is equivalent to being not oak and not unsightly.
It can be concluded that Alston is oak and Chalmers is horrible once knowing that Grayson is tough.
If there is at least one people who is environmental, then Alston is tough. | Alston is untidy. | neutral |
Royce is not untidy.
Norris is not untidy.
Clifford is not oak.
Chalmers is not horrible.
Alston is environmental.
Clifford is untidy.
Gilbert is untidy.
Royce is environmental.
Chalmers is unsightly.
Royce is unsightly.
Grayson is not tough.
Royce is oak.Someone who is unsightly is always both untidy and environmental.
If all people are untidy, then Royce is not horrible.
If someone is not untidy or he is tough, then he is horrible.
Chalmers being environmental and Grayson being untidy imply that Grayson is tough.
If Royce is not oak or Alston is tough, then Clifford is horrible.
If there is someone who is not tough, then Alston is not unsightly.
If everyone is not oak or not untidy, then Royce is horrible.
If there is at least one people who is both not horrible and tough, then Alston is environmental.
Gilbert being environmental is equivalent to Clifford being not unsightly and Chalmers being tough.
Someone being both untidy and horrible is equivalent to being not oak and not unsightly.
It can be concluded that Alston is oak and Chalmers is horrible once knowing that Grayson is tough.
If there is at least one people who is environmental, then Alston is tough. | Grayson is unsightly. | neutral |
Royce is not untidy.
Norris is not untidy.
Clifford is not oak.
Chalmers is not horrible.
Alston is environmental.
Clifford is untidy.
Gilbert is untidy.
Royce is environmental.
Chalmers is unsightly.
Royce is unsightly.
Grayson is not tough.
Royce is oak.Someone who is unsightly is always both untidy and environmental.
If all people are untidy, then Royce is not horrible.
If someone is not untidy or he is tough, then he is horrible.
Chalmers being environmental and Grayson being untidy imply that Grayson is tough.
If Royce is not oak or Alston is tough, then Clifford is horrible.
If there is someone who is not tough, then Alston is not unsightly.
If everyone is not oak or not untidy, then Royce is horrible.
If there is at least one people who is both not horrible and tough, then Alston is environmental.
Gilbert being environmental is equivalent to Clifford being not unsightly and Chalmers being tough.
Someone being both untidy and horrible is equivalent to being not oak and not unsightly.
It can be concluded that Alston is oak and Chalmers is horrible once knowing that Grayson is tough.
If there is at least one people who is environmental, then Alston is tough. | Clifford is not horrible. | contradiction |
Royce is not untidy.
Norris is not untidy.
Clifford is not oak.
Chalmers is not horrible.
Alston is environmental.
Clifford is untidy.
Gilbert is untidy.
Royce is environmental.
Chalmers is unsightly.
Royce is unsightly.
Grayson is not tough.
Royce is oak.Someone who is unsightly is always both untidy and environmental.
If all people are untidy, then Royce is not horrible.
If someone is not untidy or he is tough, then he is horrible.
Chalmers being environmental and Grayson being untidy imply that Grayson is tough.
If Royce is not oak or Alston is tough, then Clifford is horrible.
If there is someone who is not tough, then Alston is not unsightly.
If everyone is not oak or not untidy, then Royce is horrible.
If there is at least one people who is both not horrible and tough, then Alston is environmental.
Gilbert being environmental is equivalent to Clifford being not unsightly and Chalmers being tough.
Someone being both untidy and horrible is equivalent to being not oak and not unsightly.
It can be concluded that Alston is oak and Chalmers is horrible once knowing that Grayson is tough.
If there is at least one people who is environmental, then Alston is tough. | Norris is not horrible. | contradiction |
Royce is not untidy.
Norris is not untidy.
Clifford is not oak.
Chalmers is not horrible.
Alston is environmental.
Clifford is untidy.
Gilbert is untidy.
Royce is environmental.
Chalmers is unsightly.
Royce is unsightly.
Grayson is not tough.
Royce is oak.Someone who is unsightly is always both untidy and environmental.
If all people are untidy, then Royce is not horrible.
If someone is not untidy or he is tough, then he is horrible.
Chalmers being environmental and Grayson being untidy imply that Grayson is tough.
If Royce is not oak or Alston is tough, then Clifford is horrible.
If there is someone who is not tough, then Alston is not unsightly.
If everyone is not oak or not untidy, then Royce is horrible.
If there is at least one people who is both not horrible and tough, then Alston is environmental.
Gilbert being environmental is equivalent to Clifford being not unsightly and Chalmers being tough.
Someone being both untidy and horrible is equivalent to being not oak and not unsightly.
It can be concluded that Alston is oak and Chalmers is horrible once knowing that Grayson is tough.
If there is at least one people who is environmental, then Alston is tough. | Royce is not untidy. | self_contradiction |
Royce is not untidy.
Norris is not untidy.
Clifford is not oak.
Chalmers is not horrible.
Alston is environmental.
Clifford is untidy.
Gilbert is untidy.
Royce is environmental.
Chalmers is unsightly.
Royce is unsightly.
Grayson is not tough.
Royce is oak.Someone who is unsightly is always both untidy and environmental.
If all people are untidy, then Royce is not horrible.
If someone is not untidy or he is tough, then he is horrible.
Chalmers being environmental and Grayson being untidy imply that Grayson is tough.
If Royce is not oak or Alston is tough, then Clifford is horrible.
If there is someone who is not tough, then Alston is not unsightly.
If everyone is not oak or not untidy, then Royce is horrible.
If there is at least one people who is both not horrible and tough, then Alston is environmental.
Gilbert being environmental is equivalent to Clifford being not unsightly and Chalmers being tough.
Someone being both untidy and horrible is equivalent to being not oak and not unsightly.
It can be concluded that Alston is oak and Chalmers is horrible once knowing that Grayson is tough.
If there is at least one people who is environmental, then Alston is tough. | Clifford is untidy. | entailment |
Royce is not untidy.
Norris is not untidy.
Clifford is not oak.
Chalmers is not horrible.
Alston is environmental.
Clifford is untidy.
Gilbert is untidy.
Royce is environmental.
Chalmers is unsightly.
Royce is unsightly.
Grayson is not tough.
Royce is oak.Someone who is unsightly is always both untidy and environmental.
If all people are untidy, then Royce is not horrible.
If someone is not untidy or he is tough, then he is horrible.
Chalmers being environmental and Grayson being untidy imply that Grayson is tough.
If Royce is not oak or Alston is tough, then Clifford is horrible.
If there is someone who is not tough, then Alston is not unsightly.
If everyone is not oak or not untidy, then Royce is horrible.
If there is at least one people who is both not horrible and tough, then Alston is environmental.
Gilbert being environmental is equivalent to Clifford being not unsightly and Chalmers being tough.
Someone being both untidy and horrible is equivalent to being not oak and not unsightly.
It can be concluded that Alston is oak and Chalmers is horrible once knowing that Grayson is tough.
If there is at least one people who is environmental, then Alston is tough. | Norris is not oak. | neutral |
Royce is not untidy.
Norris is not untidy.
Clifford is not oak.
Chalmers is not horrible.
Alston is environmental.
Clifford is untidy.
Gilbert is untidy.
Royce is environmental.
Chalmers is unsightly.
Royce is unsightly.
Grayson is not tough.
Royce is oak.Someone who is unsightly is always both untidy and environmental.
If all people are untidy, then Royce is not horrible.
If someone is not untidy or he is tough, then he is horrible.
Chalmers being environmental and Grayson being untidy imply that Grayson is tough.
If Royce is not oak or Alston is tough, then Clifford is horrible.
If there is someone who is not tough, then Alston is not unsightly.
If everyone is not oak or not untidy, then Royce is horrible.
If there is at least one people who is both not horrible and tough, then Alston is environmental.
Gilbert being environmental is equivalent to Clifford being not unsightly and Chalmers being tough.
Someone being both untidy and horrible is equivalent to being not oak and not unsightly.
It can be concluded that Alston is oak and Chalmers is horrible once knowing that Grayson is tough.
If there is at least one people who is environmental, then Alston is tough. | Norris is horrible. | entailment |
Royce is not untidy.
Norris is not untidy.
Clifford is not oak.
Chalmers is not horrible.
Alston is environmental.
Clifford is untidy.
Gilbert is untidy.
Royce is environmental.
Chalmers is unsightly.
Royce is unsightly.
Grayson is not tough.
Royce is oak.Someone who is unsightly is always both untidy and environmental.
If all people are untidy, then Royce is not horrible.
If someone is not untidy or he is tough, then he is horrible.
Chalmers being environmental and Grayson being untidy imply that Grayson is tough.
If Royce is not oak or Alston is tough, then Clifford is horrible.
If there is someone who is not tough, then Alston is not unsightly.
If everyone is not oak or not untidy, then Royce is horrible.
If there is at least one people who is both not horrible and tough, then Alston is environmental.
Gilbert being environmental is equivalent to Clifford being not unsightly and Chalmers being tough.
Someone being both untidy and horrible is equivalent to being not oak and not unsightly.
It can be concluded that Alston is oak and Chalmers is horrible once knowing that Grayson is tough.
If there is at least one people who is environmental, then Alston is tough. | Alston is not environmental. | contradiction |
Royce is not untidy.
Norris is not untidy.
Clifford is not oak.
Chalmers is not horrible.
Alston is environmental.
Clifford is untidy.
Gilbert is untidy.
Royce is environmental.
Chalmers is unsightly.
Royce is unsightly.
Grayson is not tough.
Royce is oak.Someone who is unsightly is always both untidy and environmental.
If all people are untidy, then Royce is not horrible.
If someone is not untidy or he is tough, then he is horrible.
Chalmers being environmental and Grayson being untidy imply that Grayson is tough.
If Royce is not oak or Alston is tough, then Clifford is horrible.
If there is someone who is not tough, then Alston is not unsightly.
If everyone is not oak or not untidy, then Royce is horrible.
If there is at least one people who is both not horrible and tough, then Alston is environmental.
Gilbert being environmental is equivalent to Clifford being not unsightly and Chalmers being tough.
Someone being both untidy and horrible is equivalent to being not oak and not unsightly.
It can be concluded that Alston is oak and Chalmers is horrible once knowing that Grayson is tough.
If there is at least one people who is environmental, then Alston is tough. | Royce is unsightly. | self_contradiction |
Royce is not untidy.
Norris is not untidy.
Clifford is not oak.
Chalmers is not horrible.
Alston is environmental.
Clifford is untidy.
Gilbert is untidy.
Royce is environmental.
Chalmers is unsightly.
Royce is unsightly.
Grayson is not tough.
Royce is oak.Someone who is unsightly is always both untidy and environmental.
If all people are untidy, then Royce is not horrible.
If someone is not untidy or he is tough, then he is horrible.
Chalmers being environmental and Grayson being untidy imply that Grayson is tough.
If Royce is not oak or Alston is tough, then Clifford is horrible.
If there is someone who is not tough, then Alston is not unsightly.
If everyone is not oak or not untidy, then Royce is horrible.
If there is at least one people who is both not horrible and tough, then Alston is environmental.
Gilbert being environmental is equivalent to Clifford being not unsightly and Chalmers being tough.
Someone being both untidy and horrible is equivalent to being not oak and not unsightly.
It can be concluded that Alston is oak and Chalmers is horrible once knowing that Grayson is tough.
If there is at least one people who is environmental, then Alston is tough. | Chalmers is not untidy. | contradiction |
Royce is not untidy.
Norris is not untidy.
Clifford is not oak.
Chalmers is not horrible.
Alston is environmental.
Clifford is untidy.
Gilbert is untidy.
Royce is environmental.
Chalmers is unsightly.
Royce is unsightly.
Grayson is not tough.
Royce is oak.Someone who is unsightly is always both untidy and environmental.
If all people are untidy, then Royce is not horrible.
If someone is not untidy or he is tough, then he is horrible.
Chalmers being environmental and Grayson being untidy imply that Grayson is tough.
If Royce is not oak or Alston is tough, then Clifford is horrible.
If there is someone who is not tough, then Alston is not unsightly.
If everyone is not oak or not untidy, then Royce is horrible.
If there is at least one people who is both not horrible and tough, then Alston is environmental.
Gilbert being environmental is equivalent to Clifford being not unsightly and Chalmers being tough.
Someone being both untidy and horrible is equivalent to being not oak and not unsightly.
It can be concluded that Alston is oak and Chalmers is horrible once knowing that Grayson is tough.
If there is at least one people who is environmental, then Alston is tough. | Royce is not unsightly. | self_contradiction |
Royce is not untidy.
Norris is not untidy.
Clifford is not oak.
Chalmers is not horrible.
Alston is environmental.
Clifford is untidy.
Gilbert is untidy.
Royce is environmental.
Chalmers is unsightly.
Royce is unsightly.
Grayson is not tough.
Royce is oak.Someone who is unsightly is always both untidy and environmental.
If all people are untidy, then Royce is not horrible.
If someone is not untidy or he is tough, then he is horrible.
Chalmers being environmental and Grayson being untidy imply that Grayson is tough.
If Royce is not oak or Alston is tough, then Clifford is horrible.
If there is someone who is not tough, then Alston is not unsightly.
If everyone is not oak or not untidy, then Royce is horrible.
If there is at least one people who is both not horrible and tough, then Alston is environmental.
Gilbert being environmental is equivalent to Clifford being not unsightly and Chalmers being tough.
Someone being both untidy and horrible is equivalent to being not oak and not unsightly.
It can be concluded that Alston is oak and Chalmers is horrible once knowing that Grayson is tough.
If there is at least one people who is environmental, then Alston is tough. | Alston is horrible. | entailment |
Royce is not untidy.
Norris is not untidy.
Clifford is not oak.
Chalmers is not horrible.
Alston is environmental.
Clifford is untidy.
Gilbert is untidy.
Royce is environmental.
Chalmers is unsightly.
Royce is unsightly.
Grayson is not tough.
Royce is oak.Someone who is unsightly is always both untidy and environmental.
If all people are untidy, then Royce is not horrible.
If someone is not untidy or he is tough, then he is horrible.
Chalmers being environmental and Grayson being untidy imply that Grayson is tough.
If Royce is not oak or Alston is tough, then Clifford is horrible.
If there is someone who is not tough, then Alston is not unsightly.
If everyone is not oak or not untidy, then Royce is horrible.
If there is at least one people who is both not horrible and tough, then Alston is environmental.
Gilbert being environmental is equivalent to Clifford being not unsightly and Chalmers being tough.
Someone being both untidy and horrible is equivalent to being not oak and not unsightly.
It can be concluded that Alston is oak and Chalmers is horrible once knowing that Grayson is tough.
If there is at least one people who is environmental, then Alston is tough. | Grayson is not unsightly. | neutral |
Royce is not untidy.
Norris is not untidy.
Clifford is not oak.
Chalmers is not horrible.
Alston is environmental.
Clifford is untidy.
Gilbert is untidy.
Royce is environmental.
Chalmers is unsightly.
Royce is unsightly.
Grayson is not tough.
Royce is oak.Someone who is unsightly is always both untidy and environmental.
If all people are untidy, then Royce is not horrible.
If someone is not untidy or he is tough, then he is horrible.
Chalmers being environmental and Grayson being untidy imply that Grayson is tough.
If Royce is not oak or Alston is tough, then Clifford is horrible.
If there is someone who is not tough, then Alston is not unsightly.
If everyone is not oak or not untidy, then Royce is horrible.
If there is at least one people who is both not horrible and tough, then Alston is environmental.
Gilbert being environmental is equivalent to Clifford being not unsightly and Chalmers being tough.
Someone being both untidy and horrible is equivalent to being not oak and not unsightly.
It can be concluded that Alston is oak and Chalmers is horrible once knowing that Grayson is tough.
If there is at least one people who is environmental, then Alston is tough. | Chalmers is untidy. | entailment |
Royce is not untidy.
Norris is not untidy.
Clifford is not oak.
Chalmers is not horrible.
Alston is environmental.
Clifford is untidy.
Gilbert is untidy.
Royce is environmental.
Chalmers is unsightly.
Royce is unsightly.
Grayson is not tough.
Royce is oak.Someone who is unsightly is always both untidy and environmental.
If all people are untidy, then Royce is not horrible.
If someone is not untidy or he is tough, then he is horrible.
Chalmers being environmental and Grayson being untidy imply that Grayson is tough.
If Royce is not oak or Alston is tough, then Clifford is horrible.
If there is someone who is not tough, then Alston is not unsightly.
If everyone is not oak or not untidy, then Royce is horrible.
If there is at least one people who is both not horrible and tough, then Alston is environmental.
Gilbert being environmental is equivalent to Clifford being not unsightly and Chalmers being tough.
Someone being both untidy and horrible is equivalent to being not oak and not unsightly.
It can be concluded that Alston is oak and Chalmers is horrible once knowing that Grayson is tough.
If there is at least one people who is environmental, then Alston is tough. | Royce is oak. | self_contradiction |
Royce is not untidy.
Norris is not untidy.
Clifford is not oak.
Chalmers is not horrible.
Alston is environmental.
Clifford is untidy.
Gilbert is untidy.
Royce is environmental.
Chalmers is unsightly.
Royce is unsightly.
Grayson is not tough.
Royce is oak.Someone who is unsightly is always both untidy and environmental.
If all people are untidy, then Royce is not horrible.
If someone is not untidy or he is tough, then he is horrible.
Chalmers being environmental and Grayson being untidy imply that Grayson is tough.
If Royce is not oak or Alston is tough, then Clifford is horrible.
If there is someone who is not tough, then Alston is not unsightly.
If everyone is not oak or not untidy, then Royce is horrible.
If there is at least one people who is both not horrible and tough, then Alston is environmental.
Gilbert being environmental is equivalent to Clifford being not unsightly and Chalmers being tough.
Someone being both untidy and horrible is equivalent to being not oak and not unsightly.
It can be concluded that Alston is oak and Chalmers is horrible once knowing that Grayson is tough.
If there is at least one people who is environmental, then Alston is tough. | Norris is untidy. | contradiction |
Royce is not untidy.
Norris is not untidy.
Clifford is not oak.
Chalmers is not horrible.
Alston is environmental.
Clifford is untidy.
Gilbert is untidy.
Royce is environmental.
Chalmers is unsightly.
Royce is unsightly.
Grayson is not tough.
Royce is oak.Someone who is unsightly is always both untidy and environmental.
If all people are untidy, then Royce is not horrible.
If someone is not untidy or he is tough, then he is horrible.
Chalmers being environmental and Grayson being untidy imply that Grayson is tough.
If Royce is not oak or Alston is tough, then Clifford is horrible.
If there is someone who is not tough, then Alston is not unsightly.
If everyone is not oak or not untidy, then Royce is horrible.
If there is at least one people who is both not horrible and tough, then Alston is environmental.
Gilbert being environmental is equivalent to Clifford being not unsightly and Chalmers being tough.
Someone being both untidy and horrible is equivalent to being not oak and not unsightly.
It can be concluded that Alston is oak and Chalmers is horrible once knowing that Grayson is tough.
If there is at least one people who is environmental, then Alston is tough. | Royce is not oak. | self_contradiction |
Royce is not untidy.
Norris is not untidy.
Clifford is not oak.
Chalmers is not horrible.
Alston is environmental.
Clifford is untidy.
Gilbert is untidy.
Royce is environmental.
Chalmers is unsightly.
Royce is unsightly.
Grayson is not tough.
Royce is oak.Someone who is unsightly is always both untidy and environmental.
If all people are untidy, then Royce is not horrible.
If someone is not untidy or he is tough, then he is horrible.
Chalmers being environmental and Grayson being untidy imply that Grayson is tough.
If Royce is not oak or Alston is tough, then Clifford is horrible.
If there is someone who is not tough, then Alston is not unsightly.
If everyone is not oak or not untidy, then Royce is horrible.
If there is at least one people who is both not horrible and tough, then Alston is environmental.
Gilbert being environmental is equivalent to Clifford being not unsightly and Chalmers being tough.
Someone being both untidy and horrible is equivalent to being not oak and not unsightly.
It can be concluded that Alston is oak and Chalmers is horrible once knowing that Grayson is tough.
If there is at least one people who is environmental, then Alston is tough. | Grayson is environmental. | neutral |
Sabrina is sexual.
Deborah is not defeated.
Deborah is curious.
Sabrina is defeated.
Richard is curious.
Richard is defeated.
Leonard is defeated.
Richard is not sincere.
Sabrina is curious.
Sabrina is not yellow.
Quinn is defeated.
Richard is sexual.If there is at least one people who is not defeated or not light, then Deborah is curious.
Leonard being light implies that Jorge is not defeated.
If there is someone who is not curious, then Sabrina is yellow.
It can be concluded that Jorge is sincere once knowing that Sabrina is not light and Quinn is not curious.
As long as someone is not yellow, he is not light and curious.
Someone who is light is always yellow.
If there is at least one people who is not light, then Deborah is sexual and Sabrina is not curious.
If there is someone who is defeated, then Leonard is yellow.
If there is at least one people who is sincere, then Kathie is yellow and Kathie is defeated.
If there is at least one people who is both not yellow and defeated, then Leonard is not curious.
If someone is not sincere, then he is not curious.
If someone is sincere, then he is both not curious and not light. | Sabrina is not yellow. | self_contradiction |
Sabrina is sexual.
Deborah is not defeated.
Deborah is curious.
Sabrina is defeated.
Richard is curious.
Richard is defeated.
Leonard is defeated.
Richard is not sincere.
Sabrina is curious.
Sabrina is not yellow.
Quinn is defeated.
Richard is sexual.If there is at least one people who is not defeated or not light, then Deborah is curious.
Leonard being light implies that Jorge is not defeated.
If there is someone who is not curious, then Sabrina is yellow.
It can be concluded that Jorge is sincere once knowing that Sabrina is not light and Quinn is not curious.
As long as someone is not yellow, he is not light and curious.
Someone who is light is always yellow.
If there is at least one people who is not light, then Deborah is sexual and Sabrina is not curious.
If there is someone who is defeated, then Leonard is yellow.
If there is at least one people who is sincere, then Kathie is yellow and Kathie is defeated.
If there is at least one people who is both not yellow and defeated, then Leonard is not curious.
If someone is not sincere, then he is not curious.
If someone is sincere, then he is both not curious and not light. | Deborah is curious. | entailment |
Sabrina is sexual.
Deborah is not defeated.
Deborah is curious.
Sabrina is defeated.
Richard is curious.
Richard is defeated.
Leonard is defeated.
Richard is not sincere.
Sabrina is curious.
Sabrina is not yellow.
Quinn is defeated.
Richard is sexual.If there is at least one people who is not defeated or not light, then Deborah is curious.
Leonard being light implies that Jorge is not defeated.
If there is someone who is not curious, then Sabrina is yellow.
It can be concluded that Jorge is sincere once knowing that Sabrina is not light and Quinn is not curious.
As long as someone is not yellow, he is not light and curious.
Someone who is light is always yellow.
If there is at least one people who is not light, then Deborah is sexual and Sabrina is not curious.
If there is someone who is defeated, then Leonard is yellow.
If there is at least one people who is sincere, then Kathie is yellow and Kathie is defeated.
If there is at least one people who is both not yellow and defeated, then Leonard is not curious.
If someone is not sincere, then he is not curious.
If someone is sincere, then he is both not curious and not light. | Richard is not sincere. | entailment |
Sabrina is sexual.
Deborah is not defeated.
Deborah is curious.
Sabrina is defeated.
Richard is curious.
Richard is defeated.
Leonard is defeated.
Richard is not sincere.
Sabrina is curious.
Sabrina is not yellow.
Quinn is defeated.
Richard is sexual.If there is at least one people who is not defeated or not light, then Deborah is curious.
Leonard being light implies that Jorge is not defeated.
If there is someone who is not curious, then Sabrina is yellow.
It can be concluded that Jorge is sincere once knowing that Sabrina is not light and Quinn is not curious.
As long as someone is not yellow, he is not light and curious.
Someone who is light is always yellow.
If there is at least one people who is not light, then Deborah is sexual and Sabrina is not curious.
If there is someone who is defeated, then Leonard is yellow.
If there is at least one people who is sincere, then Kathie is yellow and Kathie is defeated.
If there is at least one people who is both not yellow and defeated, then Leonard is not curious.
If someone is not sincere, then he is not curious.
If someone is sincere, then he is both not curious and not light. | Richard is sexual. | entailment |
Sabrina is sexual.
Deborah is not defeated.
Deborah is curious.
Sabrina is defeated.
Richard is curious.
Richard is defeated.
Leonard is defeated.
Richard is not sincere.
Sabrina is curious.
Sabrina is not yellow.
Quinn is defeated.
Richard is sexual.If there is at least one people who is not defeated or not light, then Deborah is curious.
Leonard being light implies that Jorge is not defeated.
If there is someone who is not curious, then Sabrina is yellow.
It can be concluded that Jorge is sincere once knowing that Sabrina is not light and Quinn is not curious.
As long as someone is not yellow, he is not light and curious.
Someone who is light is always yellow.
If there is at least one people who is not light, then Deborah is sexual and Sabrina is not curious.
If there is someone who is defeated, then Leonard is yellow.
If there is at least one people who is sincere, then Kathie is yellow and Kathie is defeated.
If there is at least one people who is both not yellow and defeated, then Leonard is not curious.
If someone is not sincere, then he is not curious.
If someone is sincere, then he is both not curious and not light. | Sabrina is yellow. | self_contradiction |
Sabrina is sexual.
Deborah is not defeated.
Deborah is curious.
Sabrina is defeated.
Richard is curious.
Richard is defeated.
Leonard is defeated.
Richard is not sincere.
Sabrina is curious.
Sabrina is not yellow.
Quinn is defeated.
Richard is sexual.If there is at least one people who is not defeated or not light, then Deborah is curious.
Leonard being light implies that Jorge is not defeated.
If there is someone who is not curious, then Sabrina is yellow.
It can be concluded that Jorge is sincere once knowing that Sabrina is not light and Quinn is not curious.
As long as someone is not yellow, he is not light and curious.
Someone who is light is always yellow.
If there is at least one people who is not light, then Deborah is sexual and Sabrina is not curious.
If there is someone who is defeated, then Leonard is yellow.
If there is at least one people who is sincere, then Kathie is yellow and Kathie is defeated.
If there is at least one people who is both not yellow and defeated, then Leonard is not curious.
If someone is not sincere, then he is not curious.
If someone is sincere, then he is both not curious and not light. | Jorge is not defeated. | neutral |
Sabrina is sexual.
Deborah is not defeated.
Deborah is curious.
Sabrina is defeated.
Richard is curious.
Richard is defeated.
Leonard is defeated.
Richard is not sincere.
Sabrina is curious.
Sabrina is not yellow.
Quinn is defeated.
Richard is sexual.If there is at least one people who is not defeated or not light, then Deborah is curious.
Leonard being light implies that Jorge is not defeated.
If there is someone who is not curious, then Sabrina is yellow.
It can be concluded that Jorge is sincere once knowing that Sabrina is not light and Quinn is not curious.
As long as someone is not yellow, he is not light and curious.
Someone who is light is always yellow.
If there is at least one people who is not light, then Deborah is sexual and Sabrina is not curious.
If there is someone who is defeated, then Leonard is yellow.
If there is at least one people who is sincere, then Kathie is yellow and Kathie is defeated.
If there is at least one people who is both not yellow and defeated, then Leonard is not curious.
If someone is not sincere, then he is not curious.
If someone is sincere, then he is both not curious and not light. | Sabrina is curious. | self_contradiction |
Sabrina is sexual.
Deborah is not defeated.
Deborah is curious.
Sabrina is defeated.
Richard is curious.
Richard is defeated.
Leonard is defeated.
Richard is not sincere.
Sabrina is curious.
Sabrina is not yellow.
Quinn is defeated.
Richard is sexual.If there is at least one people who is not defeated or not light, then Deborah is curious.
Leonard being light implies that Jorge is not defeated.
If there is someone who is not curious, then Sabrina is yellow.
It can be concluded that Jorge is sincere once knowing that Sabrina is not light and Quinn is not curious.
As long as someone is not yellow, he is not light and curious.
Someone who is light is always yellow.
If there is at least one people who is not light, then Deborah is sexual and Sabrina is not curious.
If there is someone who is defeated, then Leonard is yellow.
If there is at least one people who is sincere, then Kathie is yellow and Kathie is defeated.
If there is at least one people who is both not yellow and defeated, then Leonard is not curious.
If someone is not sincere, then he is not curious.
If someone is sincere, then he is both not curious and not light. | Leonard is not defeated. | contradiction |
Sabrina is sexual.
Deborah is not defeated.
Deborah is curious.
Sabrina is defeated.
Richard is curious.
Richard is defeated.
Leonard is defeated.
Richard is not sincere.
Sabrina is curious.
Sabrina is not yellow.
Quinn is defeated.
Richard is sexual.If there is at least one people who is not defeated or not light, then Deborah is curious.
Leonard being light implies that Jorge is not defeated.
If there is someone who is not curious, then Sabrina is yellow.
It can be concluded that Jorge is sincere once knowing that Sabrina is not light and Quinn is not curious.
As long as someone is not yellow, he is not light and curious.
Someone who is light is always yellow.
If there is at least one people who is not light, then Deborah is sexual and Sabrina is not curious.
If there is someone who is defeated, then Leonard is yellow.
If there is at least one people who is sincere, then Kathie is yellow and Kathie is defeated.
If there is at least one people who is both not yellow and defeated, then Leonard is not curious.
If someone is not sincere, then he is not curious.
If someone is sincere, then he is both not curious and not light. | Jorge is light. | neutral |
Sabrina is sexual.
Deborah is not defeated.
Deborah is curious.
Sabrina is defeated.
Richard is curious.
Richard is defeated.
Leonard is defeated.
Richard is not sincere.
Sabrina is curious.
Sabrina is not yellow.
Quinn is defeated.
Richard is sexual.If there is at least one people who is not defeated or not light, then Deborah is curious.
Leonard being light implies that Jorge is not defeated.
If there is someone who is not curious, then Sabrina is yellow.
It can be concluded that Jorge is sincere once knowing that Sabrina is not light and Quinn is not curious.
As long as someone is not yellow, he is not light and curious.
Someone who is light is always yellow.
If there is at least one people who is not light, then Deborah is sexual and Sabrina is not curious.
If there is someone who is defeated, then Leonard is yellow.
If there is at least one people who is sincere, then Kathie is yellow and Kathie is defeated.
If there is at least one people who is both not yellow and defeated, then Leonard is not curious.
If someone is not sincere, then he is not curious.
If someone is sincere, then he is both not curious and not light. | Sabrina is not sexual. | contradiction |
Sabrina is sexual.
Deborah is not defeated.
Deborah is curious.
Sabrina is defeated.
Richard is curious.
Richard is defeated.
Leonard is defeated.
Richard is not sincere.
Sabrina is curious.
Sabrina is not yellow.
Quinn is defeated.
Richard is sexual.If there is at least one people who is not defeated or not light, then Deborah is curious.
Leonard being light implies that Jorge is not defeated.
If there is someone who is not curious, then Sabrina is yellow.
It can be concluded that Jorge is sincere once knowing that Sabrina is not light and Quinn is not curious.
As long as someone is not yellow, he is not light and curious.
Someone who is light is always yellow.
If there is at least one people who is not light, then Deborah is sexual and Sabrina is not curious.
If there is someone who is defeated, then Leonard is yellow.
If there is at least one people who is sincere, then Kathie is yellow and Kathie is defeated.
If there is at least one people who is both not yellow and defeated, then Leonard is not curious.
If someone is not sincere, then he is not curious.
If someone is sincere, then he is both not curious and not light. | Richard is not defeated. | contradiction |
Sabrina is sexual.
Deborah is not defeated.
Deborah is curious.
Sabrina is defeated.
Richard is curious.
Richard is defeated.
Leonard is defeated.
Richard is not sincere.
Sabrina is curious.
Sabrina is not yellow.
Quinn is defeated.
Richard is sexual.If there is at least one people who is not defeated or not light, then Deborah is curious.
Leonard being light implies that Jorge is not defeated.
If there is someone who is not curious, then Sabrina is yellow.
It can be concluded that Jorge is sincere once knowing that Sabrina is not light and Quinn is not curious.
As long as someone is not yellow, he is not light and curious.
Someone who is light is always yellow.
If there is at least one people who is not light, then Deborah is sexual and Sabrina is not curious.
If there is someone who is defeated, then Leonard is yellow.
If there is at least one people who is sincere, then Kathie is yellow and Kathie is defeated.
If there is at least one people who is both not yellow and defeated, then Leonard is not curious.
If someone is not sincere, then he is not curious.
If someone is sincere, then he is both not curious and not light. | Richard is curious. | self_contradiction |
Sabrina is sexual.
Deborah is not defeated.
Deborah is curious.
Sabrina is defeated.
Richard is curious.
Richard is defeated.
Leonard is defeated.
Richard is not sincere.
Sabrina is curious.
Sabrina is not yellow.
Quinn is defeated.
Richard is sexual.If there is at least one people who is not defeated or not light, then Deborah is curious.
Leonard being light implies that Jorge is not defeated.
If there is someone who is not curious, then Sabrina is yellow.
It can be concluded that Jorge is sincere once knowing that Sabrina is not light and Quinn is not curious.
As long as someone is not yellow, he is not light and curious.
Someone who is light is always yellow.
If there is at least one people who is not light, then Deborah is sexual and Sabrina is not curious.
If there is someone who is defeated, then Leonard is yellow.
If there is at least one people who is sincere, then Kathie is yellow and Kathie is defeated.
If there is at least one people who is both not yellow and defeated, then Leonard is not curious.
If someone is not sincere, then he is not curious.
If someone is sincere, then he is both not curious and not light. | Sabrina is not light. | entailment |
Sabrina is sexual.
Deborah is not defeated.
Deborah is curious.
Sabrina is defeated.
Richard is curious.
Richard is defeated.
Leonard is defeated.
Richard is not sincere.
Sabrina is curious.
Sabrina is not yellow.
Quinn is defeated.
Richard is sexual.If there is at least one people who is not defeated or not light, then Deborah is curious.
Leonard being light implies that Jorge is not defeated.
If there is someone who is not curious, then Sabrina is yellow.
It can be concluded that Jorge is sincere once knowing that Sabrina is not light and Quinn is not curious.
As long as someone is not yellow, he is not light and curious.
Someone who is light is always yellow.
If there is at least one people who is not light, then Deborah is sexual and Sabrina is not curious.
If there is someone who is defeated, then Leonard is yellow.
If there is at least one people who is sincere, then Kathie is yellow and Kathie is defeated.
If there is at least one people who is both not yellow and defeated, then Leonard is not curious.
If someone is not sincere, then he is not curious.
If someone is sincere, then he is both not curious and not light. | Sabrina is not defeated. | contradiction |
Sabrina is sexual.
Deborah is not defeated.
Deborah is curious.
Sabrina is defeated.
Richard is curious.
Richard is defeated.
Leonard is defeated.
Richard is not sincere.
Sabrina is curious.
Sabrina is not yellow.
Quinn is defeated.
Richard is sexual.If there is at least one people who is not defeated or not light, then Deborah is curious.
Leonard being light implies that Jorge is not defeated.
If there is someone who is not curious, then Sabrina is yellow.
It can be concluded that Jorge is sincere once knowing that Sabrina is not light and Quinn is not curious.
As long as someone is not yellow, he is not light and curious.
Someone who is light is always yellow.
If there is at least one people who is not light, then Deborah is sexual and Sabrina is not curious.
If there is someone who is defeated, then Leonard is yellow.
If there is at least one people who is sincere, then Kathie is yellow and Kathie is defeated.
If there is at least one people who is both not yellow and defeated, then Leonard is not curious.
If someone is not sincere, then he is not curious.
If someone is sincere, then he is both not curious and not light. | Richard is not curious. | self_contradiction |
Sabrina is sexual.
Deborah is not defeated.
Deborah is curious.
Sabrina is defeated.
Richard is curious.
Richard is defeated.
Leonard is defeated.
Richard is not sincere.
Sabrina is curious.
Sabrina is not yellow.
Quinn is defeated.
Richard is sexual.If there is at least one people who is not defeated or not light, then Deborah is curious.
Leonard being light implies that Jorge is not defeated.
If there is someone who is not curious, then Sabrina is yellow.
It can be concluded that Jorge is sincere once knowing that Sabrina is not light and Quinn is not curious.
As long as someone is not yellow, he is not light and curious.
Someone who is light is always yellow.
If there is at least one people who is not light, then Deborah is sexual and Sabrina is not curious.
If there is someone who is defeated, then Leonard is yellow.
If there is at least one people who is sincere, then Kathie is yellow and Kathie is defeated.
If there is at least one people who is both not yellow and defeated, then Leonard is not curious.
If someone is not sincere, then he is not curious.
If someone is sincere, then he is both not curious and not light. | Deborah is defeated. | contradiction |
Sabrina is sexual.
Deborah is not defeated.
Deborah is curious.
Sabrina is defeated.
Richard is curious.
Richard is defeated.
Leonard is defeated.
Richard is not sincere.
Sabrina is curious.
Sabrina is not yellow.
Quinn is defeated.
Richard is sexual.If there is at least one people who is not defeated or not light, then Deborah is curious.
Leonard being light implies that Jorge is not defeated.
If there is someone who is not curious, then Sabrina is yellow.
It can be concluded that Jorge is sincere once knowing that Sabrina is not light and Quinn is not curious.
As long as someone is not yellow, he is not light and curious.
Someone who is light is always yellow.
If there is at least one people who is not light, then Deborah is sexual and Sabrina is not curious.
If there is someone who is defeated, then Leonard is yellow.
If there is at least one people who is sincere, then Kathie is yellow and Kathie is defeated.
If there is at least one people who is both not yellow and defeated, then Leonard is not curious.
If someone is not sincere, then he is not curious.
If someone is sincere, then he is both not curious and not light. | Kathie is sexual. | neutral |
Sabrina is sexual.
Deborah is not defeated.
Deborah is curious.
Sabrina is defeated.
Richard is curious.
Richard is defeated.
Leonard is defeated.
Richard is not sincere.
Sabrina is curious.
Sabrina is not yellow.
Quinn is defeated.
Richard is sexual.If there is at least one people who is not defeated or not light, then Deborah is curious.
Leonard being light implies that Jorge is not defeated.
If there is someone who is not curious, then Sabrina is yellow.
It can be concluded that Jorge is sincere once knowing that Sabrina is not light and Quinn is not curious.
As long as someone is not yellow, he is not light and curious.
Someone who is light is always yellow.
If there is at least one people who is not light, then Deborah is sexual and Sabrina is not curious.
If there is someone who is defeated, then Leonard is yellow.
If there is at least one people who is sincere, then Kathie is yellow and Kathie is defeated.
If there is at least one people who is both not yellow and defeated, then Leonard is not curious.
If someone is not sincere, then he is not curious.
If someone is sincere, then he is both not curious and not light. | Leonard is sexual. | neutral |
Sabrina is sexual.
Deborah is not defeated.
Deborah is curious.
Sabrina is defeated.
Richard is curious.
Richard is defeated.
Leonard is defeated.
Richard is not sincere.
Sabrina is curious.
Sabrina is not yellow.
Quinn is defeated.
Richard is sexual.If there is at least one people who is not defeated or not light, then Deborah is curious.
Leonard being light implies that Jorge is not defeated.
If there is someone who is not curious, then Sabrina is yellow.
It can be concluded that Jorge is sincere once knowing that Sabrina is not light and Quinn is not curious.
As long as someone is not yellow, he is not light and curious.
Someone who is light is always yellow.
If there is at least one people who is not light, then Deborah is sexual and Sabrina is not curious.
If there is someone who is defeated, then Leonard is yellow.
If there is at least one people who is sincere, then Kathie is yellow and Kathie is defeated.
If there is at least one people who is both not yellow and defeated, then Leonard is not curious.
If someone is not sincere, then he is not curious.
If someone is sincere, then he is both not curious and not light. | Sabrina is sexual. | entailment |
Sabrina is sexual.
Deborah is not defeated.
Deborah is curious.
Sabrina is defeated.
Richard is curious.
Richard is defeated.
Leonard is defeated.
Richard is not sincere.
Sabrina is curious.
Sabrina is not yellow.
Quinn is defeated.
Richard is sexual.If there is at least one people who is not defeated or not light, then Deborah is curious.
Leonard being light implies that Jorge is not defeated.
If there is someone who is not curious, then Sabrina is yellow.
It can be concluded that Jorge is sincere once knowing that Sabrina is not light and Quinn is not curious.
As long as someone is not yellow, he is not light and curious.
Someone who is light is always yellow.
If there is at least one people who is not light, then Deborah is sexual and Sabrina is not curious.
If there is someone who is defeated, then Leonard is yellow.
If there is at least one people who is sincere, then Kathie is yellow and Kathie is defeated.
If there is at least one people who is both not yellow and defeated, then Leonard is not curious.
If someone is not sincere, then he is not curious.
If someone is sincere, then he is both not curious and not light. | Deborah is light. | neutral |
Hadley is not lucky.
Morton is condemned.
Carter is not thoughtless.
Rufus is thoughtless.
Carter is unfair.
Morton is not thoughtless.
Blanche is sufficient.
Blanche is lucky.
Kelvin is sufficient.
Blanche is unfair.
Carter is good-tempered.
Blanche is thoughtless.If someone is sufficient, then he is not lucky.
If all people are unfair, then Hadley is not lucky.
Rufus being not thoughtless is equivalent to Kelvin being lucky.
If there is at least one people who is not unfair or not good-tempered, then Carter is not thoughtless.
If Morton is sufficient, then Blanche is condemned, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is unfair, then Carter is good-tempered and Rufus is not sufficient.
If someone is not unfair and not condemned, then he is both sufficient and thoughtless, and vice versa.
If Rodney is thoughtless, then Blanche is not sufficient and Morton is not condemned, and vice versa.
If someone is thoughtless or not unfair, then he is not good-tempered.
If someone is both good-tempered and lucky, then he is not thoughtless.
If there is someone who is both condemned and thoughtless, then Hadley is unfair and Kelvin is sufficient.
Someone being both not good-tempered and unfair is equivalent to being not thoughtless and not sufficient. | Morton is unfair. | neutral |
Hadley is not lucky.
Morton is condemned.
Carter is not thoughtless.
Rufus is thoughtless.
Carter is unfair.
Morton is not thoughtless.
Blanche is sufficient.
Blanche is lucky.
Kelvin is sufficient.
Blanche is unfair.
Carter is good-tempered.
Blanche is thoughtless.If someone is sufficient, then he is not lucky.
If all people are unfair, then Hadley is not lucky.
Rufus being not thoughtless is equivalent to Kelvin being lucky.
If there is at least one people who is not unfair or not good-tempered, then Carter is not thoughtless.
If Morton is sufficient, then Blanche is condemned, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is unfair, then Carter is good-tempered and Rufus is not sufficient.
If someone is not unfair and not condemned, then he is both sufficient and thoughtless, and vice versa.
If Rodney is thoughtless, then Blanche is not sufficient and Morton is not condemned, and vice versa.
If someone is thoughtless or not unfair, then he is not good-tempered.
If someone is both good-tempered and lucky, then he is not thoughtless.
If there is someone who is both condemned and thoughtless, then Hadley is unfair and Kelvin is sufficient.
Someone being both not good-tempered and unfair is equivalent to being not thoughtless and not sufficient. | Morton is not thoughtless. | entailment |
Hadley is not lucky.
Morton is condemned.
Carter is not thoughtless.
Rufus is thoughtless.
Carter is unfair.
Morton is not thoughtless.
Blanche is sufficient.
Blanche is lucky.
Kelvin is sufficient.
Blanche is unfair.
Carter is good-tempered.
Blanche is thoughtless.If someone is sufficient, then he is not lucky.
If all people are unfair, then Hadley is not lucky.
Rufus being not thoughtless is equivalent to Kelvin being lucky.
If there is at least one people who is not unfair or not good-tempered, then Carter is not thoughtless.
If Morton is sufficient, then Blanche is condemned, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is unfair, then Carter is good-tempered and Rufus is not sufficient.
If someone is not unfair and not condemned, then he is both sufficient and thoughtless, and vice versa.
If Rodney is thoughtless, then Blanche is not sufficient and Morton is not condemned, and vice versa.
If someone is thoughtless or not unfair, then he is not good-tempered.
If someone is both good-tempered and lucky, then he is not thoughtless.
If there is someone who is both condemned and thoughtless, then Hadley is unfair and Kelvin is sufficient.
Someone being both not good-tempered and unfair is equivalent to being not thoughtless and not sufficient. | Blanche is not condemned. | entailment |
Hadley is not lucky.
Morton is condemned.
Carter is not thoughtless.
Rufus is thoughtless.
Carter is unfair.
Morton is not thoughtless.
Blanche is sufficient.
Blanche is lucky.
Kelvin is sufficient.
Blanche is unfair.
Carter is good-tempered.
Blanche is thoughtless.If someone is sufficient, then he is not lucky.
If all people are unfair, then Hadley is not lucky.
Rufus being not thoughtless is equivalent to Kelvin being lucky.
If there is at least one people who is not unfair or not good-tempered, then Carter is not thoughtless.
If Morton is sufficient, then Blanche is condemned, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is unfair, then Carter is good-tempered and Rufus is not sufficient.
If someone is not unfair and not condemned, then he is both sufficient and thoughtless, and vice versa.
If Rodney is thoughtless, then Blanche is not sufficient and Morton is not condemned, and vice versa.
If someone is thoughtless or not unfair, then he is not good-tempered.
If someone is both good-tempered and lucky, then he is not thoughtless.
If there is someone who is both condemned and thoughtless, then Hadley is unfair and Kelvin is sufficient.
Someone being both not good-tempered and unfair is equivalent to being not thoughtless and not sufficient. | Kelvin is not sufficient. | contradiction |
Hadley is not lucky.
Morton is condemned.
Carter is not thoughtless.
Rufus is thoughtless.
Carter is unfair.
Morton is not thoughtless.
Blanche is sufficient.
Blanche is lucky.
Kelvin is sufficient.
Blanche is unfair.
Carter is good-tempered.
Blanche is thoughtless.If someone is sufficient, then he is not lucky.
If all people are unfair, then Hadley is not lucky.
Rufus being not thoughtless is equivalent to Kelvin being lucky.
If there is at least one people who is not unfair or not good-tempered, then Carter is not thoughtless.
If Morton is sufficient, then Blanche is condemned, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is unfair, then Carter is good-tempered and Rufus is not sufficient.
If someone is not unfair and not condemned, then he is both sufficient and thoughtless, and vice versa.
If Rodney is thoughtless, then Blanche is not sufficient and Morton is not condemned, and vice versa.
If someone is thoughtless or not unfair, then he is not good-tempered.
If someone is both good-tempered and lucky, then he is not thoughtless.
If there is someone who is both condemned and thoughtless, then Hadley is unfair and Kelvin is sufficient.
Someone being both not good-tempered and unfair is equivalent to being not thoughtless and not sufficient. | Blanche is not good-tempered. | entailment |
Hadley is not lucky.
Morton is condemned.
Carter is not thoughtless.
Rufus is thoughtless.
Carter is unfair.
Morton is not thoughtless.
Blanche is sufficient.
Blanche is lucky.
Kelvin is sufficient.
Blanche is unfair.
Carter is good-tempered.
Blanche is thoughtless.If someone is sufficient, then he is not lucky.
If all people are unfair, then Hadley is not lucky.
Rufus being not thoughtless is equivalent to Kelvin being lucky.
If there is at least one people who is not unfair or not good-tempered, then Carter is not thoughtless.
If Morton is sufficient, then Blanche is condemned, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is unfair, then Carter is good-tempered and Rufus is not sufficient.
If someone is not unfair and not condemned, then he is both sufficient and thoughtless, and vice versa.
If Rodney is thoughtless, then Blanche is not sufficient and Morton is not condemned, and vice versa.
If someone is thoughtless or not unfair, then he is not good-tempered.
If someone is both good-tempered and lucky, then he is not thoughtless.
If there is someone who is both condemned and thoughtless, then Hadley is unfair and Kelvin is sufficient.
Someone being both not good-tempered and unfair is equivalent to being not thoughtless and not sufficient. | Morton is good-tempered. | neutral |
Hadley is not lucky.
Morton is condemned.
Carter is not thoughtless.
Rufus is thoughtless.
Carter is unfair.
Morton is not thoughtless.
Blanche is sufficient.
Blanche is lucky.
Kelvin is sufficient.
Blanche is unfair.
Carter is good-tempered.
Blanche is thoughtless.If someone is sufficient, then he is not lucky.
If all people are unfair, then Hadley is not lucky.
Rufus being not thoughtless is equivalent to Kelvin being lucky.
If there is at least one people who is not unfair or not good-tempered, then Carter is not thoughtless.
If Morton is sufficient, then Blanche is condemned, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is unfair, then Carter is good-tempered and Rufus is not sufficient.
If someone is not unfair and not condemned, then he is both sufficient and thoughtless, and vice versa.
If Rodney is thoughtless, then Blanche is not sufficient and Morton is not condemned, and vice versa.
If someone is thoughtless or not unfair, then he is not good-tempered.
If someone is both good-tempered and lucky, then he is not thoughtless.
If there is someone who is both condemned and thoughtless, then Hadley is unfair and Kelvin is sufficient.
Someone being both not good-tempered and unfair is equivalent to being not thoughtless and not sufficient. | Blanche is not thoughtless. | self_contradiction |
Hadley is not lucky.
Morton is condemned.
Carter is not thoughtless.
Rufus is thoughtless.
Carter is unfair.
Morton is not thoughtless.
Blanche is sufficient.
Blanche is lucky.
Kelvin is sufficient.
Blanche is unfair.
Carter is good-tempered.
Blanche is thoughtless.If someone is sufficient, then he is not lucky.
If all people are unfair, then Hadley is not lucky.
Rufus being not thoughtless is equivalent to Kelvin being lucky.
If there is at least one people who is not unfair or not good-tempered, then Carter is not thoughtless.
If Morton is sufficient, then Blanche is condemned, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is unfair, then Carter is good-tempered and Rufus is not sufficient.
If someone is not unfair and not condemned, then he is both sufficient and thoughtless, and vice versa.
If Rodney is thoughtless, then Blanche is not sufficient and Morton is not condemned, and vice versa.
If someone is thoughtless or not unfair, then he is not good-tempered.
If someone is both good-tempered and lucky, then he is not thoughtless.
If there is someone who is both condemned and thoughtless, then Hadley is unfair and Kelvin is sufficient.
Someone being both not good-tempered and unfair is equivalent to being not thoughtless and not sufficient. | Blanche is lucky. | self_contradiction |
Hadley is not lucky.
Morton is condemned.
Carter is not thoughtless.
Rufus is thoughtless.
Carter is unfair.
Morton is not thoughtless.
Blanche is sufficient.
Blanche is lucky.
Kelvin is sufficient.
Blanche is unfair.
Carter is good-tempered.
Blanche is thoughtless.If someone is sufficient, then he is not lucky.
If all people are unfair, then Hadley is not lucky.
Rufus being not thoughtless is equivalent to Kelvin being lucky.
If there is at least one people who is not unfair or not good-tempered, then Carter is not thoughtless.
If Morton is sufficient, then Blanche is condemned, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is unfair, then Carter is good-tempered and Rufus is not sufficient.
If someone is not unfair and not condemned, then he is both sufficient and thoughtless, and vice versa.
If Rodney is thoughtless, then Blanche is not sufficient and Morton is not condemned, and vice versa.
If someone is thoughtless or not unfair, then he is not good-tempered.
If someone is both good-tempered and lucky, then he is not thoughtless.
If there is someone who is both condemned and thoughtless, then Hadley is unfair and Kelvin is sufficient.
Someone being both not good-tempered and unfair is equivalent to being not thoughtless and not sufficient. | Rodney is lucky. | neutral |
Hadley is not lucky.
Morton is condemned.
Carter is not thoughtless.
Rufus is thoughtless.
Carter is unfair.
Morton is not thoughtless.
Blanche is sufficient.
Blanche is lucky.
Kelvin is sufficient.
Blanche is unfair.
Carter is good-tempered.
Blanche is thoughtless.If someone is sufficient, then he is not lucky.
If all people are unfair, then Hadley is not lucky.
Rufus being not thoughtless is equivalent to Kelvin being lucky.
If there is at least one people who is not unfair or not good-tempered, then Carter is not thoughtless.
If Morton is sufficient, then Blanche is condemned, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is unfair, then Carter is good-tempered and Rufus is not sufficient.
If someone is not unfair and not condemned, then he is both sufficient and thoughtless, and vice versa.
If Rodney is thoughtless, then Blanche is not sufficient and Morton is not condemned, and vice versa.
If someone is thoughtless or not unfair, then he is not good-tempered.
If someone is both good-tempered and lucky, then he is not thoughtless.
If there is someone who is both condemned and thoughtless, then Hadley is unfair and Kelvin is sufficient.
Someone being both not good-tempered and unfair is equivalent to being not thoughtless and not sufficient. | Rufus is not sufficient. | entailment |
Hadley is not lucky.
Morton is condemned.
Carter is not thoughtless.
Rufus is thoughtless.
Carter is unfair.
Morton is not thoughtless.
Blanche is sufficient.
Blanche is lucky.
Kelvin is sufficient.
Blanche is unfair.
Carter is good-tempered.
Blanche is thoughtless.If someone is sufficient, then he is not lucky.
If all people are unfair, then Hadley is not lucky.
Rufus being not thoughtless is equivalent to Kelvin being lucky.
If there is at least one people who is not unfair or not good-tempered, then Carter is not thoughtless.
If Morton is sufficient, then Blanche is condemned, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is unfair, then Carter is good-tempered and Rufus is not sufficient.
If someone is not unfair and not condemned, then he is both sufficient and thoughtless, and vice versa.
If Rodney is thoughtless, then Blanche is not sufficient and Morton is not condemned, and vice versa.
If someone is thoughtless or not unfair, then he is not good-tempered.
If someone is both good-tempered and lucky, then he is not thoughtless.
If there is someone who is both condemned and thoughtless, then Hadley is unfair and Kelvin is sufficient.
Someone being both not good-tempered and unfair is equivalent to being not thoughtless and not sufficient. | Hadley is not sufficient. | neutral |
Hadley is not lucky.
Morton is condemned.
Carter is not thoughtless.
Rufus is thoughtless.
Carter is unfair.
Morton is not thoughtless.
Blanche is sufficient.
Blanche is lucky.
Kelvin is sufficient.
Blanche is unfair.
Carter is good-tempered.
Blanche is thoughtless.If someone is sufficient, then he is not lucky.
If all people are unfair, then Hadley is not lucky.
Rufus being not thoughtless is equivalent to Kelvin being lucky.
If there is at least one people who is not unfair or not good-tempered, then Carter is not thoughtless.
If Morton is sufficient, then Blanche is condemned, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is unfair, then Carter is good-tempered and Rufus is not sufficient.
If someone is not unfair and not condemned, then he is both sufficient and thoughtless, and vice versa.
If Rodney is thoughtless, then Blanche is not sufficient and Morton is not condemned, and vice versa.
If someone is thoughtless or not unfair, then he is not good-tempered.
If someone is both good-tempered and lucky, then he is not thoughtless.
If there is someone who is both condemned and thoughtless, then Hadley is unfair and Kelvin is sufficient.
Someone being both not good-tempered and unfair is equivalent to being not thoughtless and not sufficient. | Hadley is unfair. | entailment |
Hadley is not lucky.
Morton is condemned.
Carter is not thoughtless.
Rufus is thoughtless.
Carter is unfair.
Morton is not thoughtless.
Blanche is sufficient.
Blanche is lucky.
Kelvin is sufficient.
Blanche is unfair.
Carter is good-tempered.
Blanche is thoughtless.If someone is sufficient, then he is not lucky.
If all people are unfair, then Hadley is not lucky.
Rufus being not thoughtless is equivalent to Kelvin being lucky.
If there is at least one people who is not unfair or not good-tempered, then Carter is not thoughtless.
If Morton is sufficient, then Blanche is condemned, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is unfair, then Carter is good-tempered and Rufus is not sufficient.
If someone is not unfair and not condemned, then he is both sufficient and thoughtless, and vice versa.
If Rodney is thoughtless, then Blanche is not sufficient and Morton is not condemned, and vice versa.
If someone is thoughtless or not unfair, then he is not good-tempered.
If someone is both good-tempered and lucky, then he is not thoughtless.
If there is someone who is both condemned and thoughtless, then Hadley is unfair and Kelvin is sufficient.
Someone being both not good-tempered and unfair is equivalent to being not thoughtless and not sufficient. | Blanche is unfair. | self_contradiction |
Hadley is not lucky.
Morton is condemned.
Carter is not thoughtless.
Rufus is thoughtless.
Carter is unfair.
Morton is not thoughtless.
Blanche is sufficient.
Blanche is lucky.
Kelvin is sufficient.
Blanche is unfair.
Carter is good-tempered.
Blanche is thoughtless.If someone is sufficient, then he is not lucky.
If all people are unfair, then Hadley is not lucky.
Rufus being not thoughtless is equivalent to Kelvin being lucky.
If there is at least one people who is not unfair or not good-tempered, then Carter is not thoughtless.
If Morton is sufficient, then Blanche is condemned, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is unfair, then Carter is good-tempered and Rufus is not sufficient.
If someone is not unfair and not condemned, then he is both sufficient and thoughtless, and vice versa.
If Rodney is thoughtless, then Blanche is not sufficient and Morton is not condemned, and vice versa.
If someone is thoughtless or not unfair, then he is not good-tempered.
If someone is both good-tempered and lucky, then he is not thoughtless.
If there is someone who is both condemned and thoughtless, then Hadley is unfair and Kelvin is sufficient.
Someone being both not good-tempered and unfair is equivalent to being not thoughtless and not sufficient. | Blanche is not sufficient. | self_contradiction |
Hadley is not lucky.
Morton is condemned.
Carter is not thoughtless.
Rufus is thoughtless.
Carter is unfair.
Morton is not thoughtless.
Blanche is sufficient.
Blanche is lucky.
Kelvin is sufficient.
Blanche is unfair.
Carter is good-tempered.
Blanche is thoughtless.If someone is sufficient, then he is not lucky.
If all people are unfair, then Hadley is not lucky.
Rufus being not thoughtless is equivalent to Kelvin being lucky.
If there is at least one people who is not unfair or not good-tempered, then Carter is not thoughtless.
If Morton is sufficient, then Blanche is condemned, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is unfair, then Carter is good-tempered and Rufus is not sufficient.
If someone is not unfair and not condemned, then he is both sufficient and thoughtless, and vice versa.
If Rodney is thoughtless, then Blanche is not sufficient and Morton is not condemned, and vice versa.
If someone is thoughtless or not unfair, then he is not good-tempered.
If someone is both good-tempered and lucky, then he is not thoughtless.
If there is someone who is both condemned and thoughtless, then Hadley is unfair and Kelvin is sufficient.
Someone being both not good-tempered and unfair is equivalent to being not thoughtless and not sufficient. | Carter is not unfair. | contradiction |
Hadley is not lucky.
Morton is condemned.
Carter is not thoughtless.
Rufus is thoughtless.
Carter is unfair.
Morton is not thoughtless.
Blanche is sufficient.
Blanche is lucky.
Kelvin is sufficient.
Blanche is unfair.
Carter is good-tempered.
Blanche is thoughtless.If someone is sufficient, then he is not lucky.
If all people are unfair, then Hadley is not lucky.
Rufus being not thoughtless is equivalent to Kelvin being lucky.
If there is at least one people who is not unfair or not good-tempered, then Carter is not thoughtless.
If Morton is sufficient, then Blanche is condemned, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is unfair, then Carter is good-tempered and Rufus is not sufficient.
If someone is not unfair and not condemned, then he is both sufficient and thoughtless, and vice versa.
If Rodney is thoughtless, then Blanche is not sufficient and Morton is not condemned, and vice versa.
If someone is thoughtless or not unfair, then he is not good-tempered.
If someone is both good-tempered and lucky, then he is not thoughtless.
If there is someone who is both condemned and thoughtless, then Hadley is unfair and Kelvin is sufficient.
Someone being both not good-tempered and unfair is equivalent to being not thoughtless and not sufficient. | Rufus is good-tempered. | contradiction |
Hadley is not lucky.
Morton is condemned.
Carter is not thoughtless.
Rufus is thoughtless.
Carter is unfair.
Morton is not thoughtless.
Blanche is sufficient.
Blanche is lucky.
Kelvin is sufficient.
Blanche is unfair.
Carter is good-tempered.
Blanche is thoughtless.If someone is sufficient, then he is not lucky.
If all people are unfair, then Hadley is not lucky.
Rufus being not thoughtless is equivalent to Kelvin being lucky.
If there is at least one people who is not unfair or not good-tempered, then Carter is not thoughtless.
If Morton is sufficient, then Blanche is condemned, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is unfair, then Carter is good-tempered and Rufus is not sufficient.
If someone is not unfair and not condemned, then he is both sufficient and thoughtless, and vice versa.
If Rodney is thoughtless, then Blanche is not sufficient and Morton is not condemned, and vice versa.
If someone is thoughtless or not unfair, then he is not good-tempered.
If someone is both good-tempered and lucky, then he is not thoughtless.
If there is someone who is both condemned and thoughtless, then Hadley is unfair and Kelvin is sufficient.
Someone being both not good-tempered and unfair is equivalent to being not thoughtless and not sufficient. | Blanche is not lucky. | self_contradiction |
Hadley is not lucky.
Morton is condemned.
Carter is not thoughtless.
Rufus is thoughtless.
Carter is unfair.
Morton is not thoughtless.
Blanche is sufficient.
Blanche is lucky.
Kelvin is sufficient.
Blanche is unfair.
Carter is good-tempered.
Blanche is thoughtless.If someone is sufficient, then he is not lucky.
If all people are unfair, then Hadley is not lucky.
Rufus being not thoughtless is equivalent to Kelvin being lucky.
If there is at least one people who is not unfair or not good-tempered, then Carter is not thoughtless.
If Morton is sufficient, then Blanche is condemned, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is unfair, then Carter is good-tempered and Rufus is not sufficient.
If someone is not unfair and not condemned, then he is both sufficient and thoughtless, and vice versa.
If Rodney is thoughtless, then Blanche is not sufficient and Morton is not condemned, and vice versa.
If someone is thoughtless or not unfair, then he is not good-tempered.
If someone is both good-tempered and lucky, then he is not thoughtless.
If there is someone who is both condemned and thoughtless, then Hadley is unfair and Kelvin is sufficient.
Someone being both not good-tempered and unfair is equivalent to being not thoughtless and not sufficient. | Carter is condemned. | neutral |
Hadley is not lucky.
Morton is condemned.
Carter is not thoughtless.
Rufus is thoughtless.
Carter is unfair.
Morton is not thoughtless.
Blanche is sufficient.
Blanche is lucky.
Kelvin is sufficient.
Blanche is unfair.
Carter is good-tempered.
Blanche is thoughtless.If someone is sufficient, then he is not lucky.
If all people are unfair, then Hadley is not lucky.
Rufus being not thoughtless is equivalent to Kelvin being lucky.
If there is at least one people who is not unfair or not good-tempered, then Carter is not thoughtless.
If Morton is sufficient, then Blanche is condemned, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is unfair, then Carter is good-tempered and Rufus is not sufficient.
If someone is not unfair and not condemned, then he is both sufficient and thoughtless, and vice versa.
If Rodney is thoughtless, then Blanche is not sufficient and Morton is not condemned, and vice versa.
If someone is thoughtless or not unfair, then he is not good-tempered.
If someone is both good-tempered and lucky, then he is not thoughtless.
If there is someone who is both condemned and thoughtless, then Hadley is unfair and Kelvin is sufficient.
Someone being both not good-tempered and unfair is equivalent to being not thoughtless and not sufficient. | Hadley is lucky. | contradiction |
Hadley is not lucky.
Morton is condemned.
Carter is not thoughtless.
Rufus is thoughtless.
Carter is unfair.
Morton is not thoughtless.
Blanche is sufficient.
Blanche is lucky.
Kelvin is sufficient.
Blanche is unfair.
Carter is good-tempered.
Blanche is thoughtless.If someone is sufficient, then he is not lucky.
If all people are unfair, then Hadley is not lucky.
Rufus being not thoughtless is equivalent to Kelvin being lucky.
If there is at least one people who is not unfair or not good-tempered, then Carter is not thoughtless.
If Morton is sufficient, then Blanche is condemned, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is unfair, then Carter is good-tempered and Rufus is not sufficient.
If someone is not unfair and not condemned, then he is both sufficient and thoughtless, and vice versa.
If Rodney is thoughtless, then Blanche is not sufficient and Morton is not condemned, and vice versa.
If someone is thoughtless or not unfair, then he is not good-tempered.
If someone is both good-tempered and lucky, then he is not thoughtless.
If there is someone who is both condemned and thoughtless, then Hadley is unfair and Kelvin is sufficient.
Someone being both not good-tempered and unfair is equivalent to being not thoughtless and not sufficient. | Carter is not good-tempered. | contradiction |
Jimmy is not eastern.
Marlon is funny.
Greyson is elegant.
Jimmy is not combative.
Braden is funny.
Greyson is mean.
Rupert is funny.
Rupert is not combative.
Greyson is not funny.
Rupert is aware.
Braden is combative.
Braden is mean.If Neville is funny, then Jimmy is eastern and Marlon is not mean.
If someone is not mean and not aware, then he is elegant, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not aware or not mean, then Marlon is funny.
If there is at least one people who is not combative or not funny, then Miranda is eastern.
If there is someone who is not mean, then Braden is not aware and Jimmy is combative.
If someone is combative or aware, then he is eastern.
Neville being mean and Neville being aware imply that Braden is not funny.
Someone is mean and eastern if and only if he is elegant.
If there is at least one people who is both not elegant and not mean, then Marlon is combative.
If there is someone who is both eastern and elegant, then Braden is mean.
Miranda is not combative if and only if Neville is not elegant.
Jimmy being eastern implies that Rupert is not funny and Greyson is mean. | Rupert is not combative. | entailment |
Jimmy is not eastern.
Marlon is funny.
Greyson is elegant.
Jimmy is not combative.
Braden is funny.
Greyson is mean.
Rupert is funny.
Rupert is not combative.
Greyson is not funny.
Rupert is aware.
Braden is combative.
Braden is mean.If Neville is funny, then Jimmy is eastern and Marlon is not mean.
If someone is not mean and not aware, then he is elegant, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not aware or not mean, then Marlon is funny.
If there is at least one people who is not combative or not funny, then Miranda is eastern.
If there is someone who is not mean, then Braden is not aware and Jimmy is combative.
If someone is combative or aware, then he is eastern.
Neville being mean and Neville being aware imply that Braden is not funny.
Someone is mean and eastern if and only if he is elegant.
If there is at least one people who is both not elegant and not mean, then Marlon is combative.
If there is someone who is both eastern and elegant, then Braden is mean.
Miranda is not combative if and only if Neville is not elegant.
Jimmy being eastern implies that Rupert is not funny and Greyson is mean. | Braden is elegant. | entailment |
Jimmy is not eastern.
Marlon is funny.
Greyson is elegant.
Jimmy is not combative.
Braden is funny.
Greyson is mean.
Rupert is funny.
Rupert is not combative.
Greyson is not funny.
Rupert is aware.
Braden is combative.
Braden is mean.If Neville is funny, then Jimmy is eastern and Marlon is not mean.
If someone is not mean and not aware, then he is elegant, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not aware or not mean, then Marlon is funny.
If there is at least one people who is not combative or not funny, then Miranda is eastern.
If there is someone who is not mean, then Braden is not aware and Jimmy is combative.
If someone is combative or aware, then he is eastern.
Neville being mean and Neville being aware imply that Braden is not funny.
Someone is mean and eastern if and only if he is elegant.
If there is at least one people who is both not elegant and not mean, then Marlon is combative.
If there is someone who is both eastern and elegant, then Braden is mean.
Miranda is not combative if and only if Neville is not elegant.
Jimmy being eastern implies that Rupert is not funny and Greyson is mean. | Rupert is eastern. | entailment |
Jimmy is not eastern.
Marlon is funny.
Greyson is elegant.
Jimmy is not combative.
Braden is funny.
Greyson is mean.
Rupert is funny.
Rupert is not combative.
Greyson is not funny.
Rupert is aware.
Braden is combative.
Braden is mean.If Neville is funny, then Jimmy is eastern and Marlon is not mean.
If someone is not mean and not aware, then he is elegant, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not aware or not mean, then Marlon is funny.
If there is at least one people who is not combative or not funny, then Miranda is eastern.
If there is someone who is not mean, then Braden is not aware and Jimmy is combative.
If someone is combative or aware, then he is eastern.
Neville being mean and Neville being aware imply that Braden is not funny.
Someone is mean and eastern if and only if he is elegant.
If there is at least one people who is both not elegant and not mean, then Marlon is combative.
If there is someone who is both eastern and elegant, then Braden is mean.
Miranda is not combative if and only if Neville is not elegant.
Jimmy being eastern implies that Rupert is not funny and Greyson is mean. | Miranda is not eastern. | contradiction |
Jimmy is not eastern.
Marlon is funny.
Greyson is elegant.
Jimmy is not combative.
Braden is funny.
Greyson is mean.
Rupert is funny.
Rupert is not combative.
Greyson is not funny.
Rupert is aware.
Braden is combative.
Braden is mean.If Neville is funny, then Jimmy is eastern and Marlon is not mean.
If someone is not mean and not aware, then he is elegant, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not aware or not mean, then Marlon is funny.
If there is at least one people who is not combative or not funny, then Miranda is eastern.
If there is someone who is not mean, then Braden is not aware and Jimmy is combative.
If someone is combative or aware, then he is eastern.
Neville being mean and Neville being aware imply that Braden is not funny.
Someone is mean and eastern if and only if he is elegant.
If there is at least one people who is both not elegant and not mean, then Marlon is combative.
If there is someone who is both eastern and elegant, then Braden is mean.
Miranda is not combative if and only if Neville is not elegant.
Jimmy being eastern implies that Rupert is not funny and Greyson is mean. | Jimmy is combative. | self_contradiction |
Jimmy is not eastern.
Marlon is funny.
Greyson is elegant.
Jimmy is not combative.
Braden is funny.
Greyson is mean.
Rupert is funny.
Rupert is not combative.
Greyson is not funny.
Rupert is aware.
Braden is combative.
Braden is mean.If Neville is funny, then Jimmy is eastern and Marlon is not mean.
If someone is not mean and not aware, then he is elegant, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not aware or not mean, then Marlon is funny.
If there is at least one people who is not combative or not funny, then Miranda is eastern.
If there is someone who is not mean, then Braden is not aware and Jimmy is combative.
If someone is combative or aware, then he is eastern.
Neville being mean and Neville being aware imply that Braden is not funny.
Someone is mean and eastern if and only if he is elegant.
If there is at least one people who is both not elegant and not mean, then Marlon is combative.
If there is someone who is both eastern and elegant, then Braden is mean.
Miranda is not combative if and only if Neville is not elegant.
Jimmy being eastern implies that Rupert is not funny and Greyson is mean. | Jimmy is not combative. | self_contradiction |
Jimmy is not eastern.
Marlon is funny.
Greyson is elegant.
Jimmy is not combative.
Braden is funny.
Greyson is mean.
Rupert is funny.
Rupert is not combative.
Greyson is not funny.
Rupert is aware.
Braden is combative.
Braden is mean.If Neville is funny, then Jimmy is eastern and Marlon is not mean.
If someone is not mean and not aware, then he is elegant, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not aware or not mean, then Marlon is funny.
If there is at least one people who is not combative or not funny, then Miranda is eastern.
If there is someone who is not mean, then Braden is not aware and Jimmy is combative.
If someone is combative or aware, then he is eastern.
Neville being mean and Neville being aware imply that Braden is not funny.
Someone is mean and eastern if and only if he is elegant.
If there is at least one people who is both not elegant and not mean, then Marlon is combative.
If there is someone who is both eastern and elegant, then Braden is mean.
Miranda is not combative if and only if Neville is not elegant.
Jimmy being eastern implies that Rupert is not funny and Greyson is mean. | Jimmy is not elegant. | neutral |
Jimmy is not eastern.
Marlon is funny.
Greyson is elegant.
Jimmy is not combative.
Braden is funny.
Greyson is mean.
Rupert is funny.
Rupert is not combative.
Greyson is not funny.
Rupert is aware.
Braden is combative.
Braden is mean.If Neville is funny, then Jimmy is eastern and Marlon is not mean.
If someone is not mean and not aware, then he is elegant, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not aware or not mean, then Marlon is funny.
If there is at least one people who is not combative or not funny, then Miranda is eastern.
If there is someone who is not mean, then Braden is not aware and Jimmy is combative.
If someone is combative or aware, then he is eastern.
Neville being mean and Neville being aware imply that Braden is not funny.
Someone is mean and eastern if and only if he is elegant.
If there is at least one people who is both not elegant and not mean, then Marlon is combative.
If there is someone who is both eastern and elegant, then Braden is mean.
Miranda is not combative if and only if Neville is not elegant.
Jimmy being eastern implies that Rupert is not funny and Greyson is mean. | Jimmy is not eastern. | self_contradiction |
Jimmy is not eastern.
Marlon is funny.
Greyson is elegant.
Jimmy is not combative.
Braden is funny.
Greyson is mean.
Rupert is funny.
Rupert is not combative.
Greyson is not funny.
Rupert is aware.
Braden is combative.
Braden is mean.If Neville is funny, then Jimmy is eastern and Marlon is not mean.
If someone is not mean and not aware, then he is elegant, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not aware or not mean, then Marlon is funny.
If there is at least one people who is not combative or not funny, then Miranda is eastern.
If there is someone who is not mean, then Braden is not aware and Jimmy is combative.
If someone is combative or aware, then he is eastern.
Neville being mean and Neville being aware imply that Braden is not funny.
Someone is mean and eastern if and only if he is elegant.
If there is at least one people who is both not elegant and not mean, then Marlon is combative.
If there is someone who is both eastern and elegant, then Braden is mean.
Miranda is not combative if and only if Neville is not elegant.
Jimmy being eastern implies that Rupert is not funny and Greyson is mean. | Marlon is not elegant. | neutral |
Jimmy is not eastern.
Marlon is funny.
Greyson is elegant.
Jimmy is not combative.
Braden is funny.
Greyson is mean.
Rupert is funny.
Rupert is not combative.
Greyson is not funny.
Rupert is aware.
Braden is combative.
Braden is mean.If Neville is funny, then Jimmy is eastern and Marlon is not mean.
If someone is not mean and not aware, then he is elegant, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not aware or not mean, then Marlon is funny.
If there is at least one people who is not combative or not funny, then Miranda is eastern.
If there is someone who is not mean, then Braden is not aware and Jimmy is combative.
If someone is combative or aware, then he is eastern.
Neville being mean and Neville being aware imply that Braden is not funny.
Someone is mean and eastern if and only if he is elegant.
If there is at least one people who is both not elegant and not mean, then Marlon is combative.
If there is someone who is both eastern and elegant, then Braden is mean.
Miranda is not combative if and only if Neville is not elegant.
Jimmy being eastern implies that Rupert is not funny and Greyson is mean. | Miranda is not combative. | neutral |
Jimmy is not eastern.
Marlon is funny.
Greyson is elegant.
Jimmy is not combative.
Braden is funny.
Greyson is mean.
Rupert is funny.
Rupert is not combative.
Greyson is not funny.
Rupert is aware.
Braden is combative.
Braden is mean.If Neville is funny, then Jimmy is eastern and Marlon is not mean.
If someone is not mean and not aware, then he is elegant, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not aware or not mean, then Marlon is funny.
If there is at least one people who is not combative or not funny, then Miranda is eastern.
If there is someone who is not mean, then Braden is not aware and Jimmy is combative.
If someone is combative or aware, then he is eastern.
Neville being mean and Neville being aware imply that Braden is not funny.
Someone is mean and eastern if and only if he is elegant.
If there is at least one people who is both not elegant and not mean, then Marlon is combative.
If there is someone who is both eastern and elegant, then Braden is mean.
Miranda is not combative if and only if Neville is not elegant.
Jimmy being eastern implies that Rupert is not funny and Greyson is mean. | Braden is not funny. | contradiction |
Jimmy is not eastern.
Marlon is funny.
Greyson is elegant.
Jimmy is not combative.
Braden is funny.
Greyson is mean.
Rupert is funny.
Rupert is not combative.
Greyson is not funny.
Rupert is aware.
Braden is combative.
Braden is mean.If Neville is funny, then Jimmy is eastern and Marlon is not mean.
If someone is not mean and not aware, then he is elegant, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not aware or not mean, then Marlon is funny.
If there is at least one people who is not combative or not funny, then Miranda is eastern.
If there is someone who is not mean, then Braden is not aware and Jimmy is combative.
If someone is combative or aware, then he is eastern.
Neville being mean and Neville being aware imply that Braden is not funny.
Someone is mean and eastern if and only if he is elegant.
If there is at least one people who is both not elegant and not mean, then Marlon is combative.
If there is someone who is both eastern and elegant, then Braden is mean.
Miranda is not combative if and only if Neville is not elegant.
Jimmy being eastern implies that Rupert is not funny and Greyson is mean. | Jimmy is elegant. | neutral |
Jimmy is not eastern.
Marlon is funny.
Greyson is elegant.
Jimmy is not combative.
Braden is funny.
Greyson is mean.
Rupert is funny.
Rupert is not combative.
Greyson is not funny.
Rupert is aware.
Braden is combative.
Braden is mean.If Neville is funny, then Jimmy is eastern and Marlon is not mean.
If someone is not mean and not aware, then he is elegant, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not aware or not mean, then Marlon is funny.
If there is at least one people who is not combative or not funny, then Miranda is eastern.
If there is someone who is not mean, then Braden is not aware and Jimmy is combative.
If someone is combative or aware, then he is eastern.
Neville being mean and Neville being aware imply that Braden is not funny.
Someone is mean and eastern if and only if he is elegant.
If there is at least one people who is both not elegant and not mean, then Marlon is combative.
If there is someone who is both eastern and elegant, then Braden is mean.
Miranda is not combative if and only if Neville is not elegant.
Jimmy being eastern implies that Rupert is not funny and Greyson is mean. | Rupert is not funny. | self_contradiction |
Jimmy is not eastern.
Marlon is funny.
Greyson is elegant.
Jimmy is not combative.
Braden is funny.
Greyson is mean.
Rupert is funny.
Rupert is not combative.
Greyson is not funny.
Rupert is aware.
Braden is combative.
Braden is mean.If Neville is funny, then Jimmy is eastern and Marlon is not mean.
If someone is not mean and not aware, then he is elegant, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not aware or not mean, then Marlon is funny.
If there is at least one people who is not combative or not funny, then Miranda is eastern.
If there is someone who is not mean, then Braden is not aware and Jimmy is combative.
If someone is combative or aware, then he is eastern.
Neville being mean and Neville being aware imply that Braden is not funny.
Someone is mean and eastern if and only if he is elegant.
If there is at least one people who is both not elegant and not mean, then Marlon is combative.
If there is someone who is both eastern and elegant, then Braden is mean.
Miranda is not combative if and only if Neville is not elegant.
Jimmy being eastern implies that Rupert is not funny and Greyson is mean. | Marlon is mean. | neutral |
Jimmy is not eastern.
Marlon is funny.
Greyson is elegant.
Jimmy is not combative.
Braden is funny.
Greyson is mean.
Rupert is funny.
Rupert is not combative.
Greyson is not funny.
Rupert is aware.
Braden is combative.
Braden is mean.If Neville is funny, then Jimmy is eastern and Marlon is not mean.
If someone is not mean and not aware, then he is elegant, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not aware or not mean, then Marlon is funny.
If there is at least one people who is not combative or not funny, then Miranda is eastern.
If there is someone who is not mean, then Braden is not aware and Jimmy is combative.
If someone is combative or aware, then he is eastern.
Neville being mean and Neville being aware imply that Braden is not funny.
Someone is mean and eastern if and only if he is elegant.
If there is at least one people who is both not elegant and not mean, then Marlon is combative.
If there is someone who is both eastern and elegant, then Braden is mean.
Miranda is not combative if and only if Neville is not elegant.
Jimmy being eastern implies that Rupert is not funny and Greyson is mean. | Rupert is not eastern. | contradiction |
Jimmy is not eastern.
Marlon is funny.
Greyson is elegant.
Jimmy is not combative.
Braden is funny.
Greyson is mean.
Rupert is funny.
Rupert is not combative.
Greyson is not funny.
Rupert is aware.
Braden is combative.
Braden is mean.If Neville is funny, then Jimmy is eastern and Marlon is not mean.
If someone is not mean and not aware, then he is elegant, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not aware or not mean, then Marlon is funny.
If there is at least one people who is not combative or not funny, then Miranda is eastern.
If there is someone who is not mean, then Braden is not aware and Jimmy is combative.
If someone is combative or aware, then he is eastern.
Neville being mean and Neville being aware imply that Braden is not funny.
Someone is mean and eastern if and only if he is elegant.
If there is at least one people who is both not elegant and not mean, then Marlon is combative.
If there is someone who is both eastern and elegant, then Braden is mean.
Miranda is not combative if and only if Neville is not elegant.
Jimmy being eastern implies that Rupert is not funny and Greyson is mean. | Greyson is elegant. | entailment |
Jimmy is not eastern.
Marlon is funny.
Greyson is elegant.
Jimmy is not combative.
Braden is funny.
Greyson is mean.
Rupert is funny.
Rupert is not combative.
Greyson is not funny.
Rupert is aware.
Braden is combative.
Braden is mean.If Neville is funny, then Jimmy is eastern and Marlon is not mean.
If someone is not mean and not aware, then he is elegant, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not aware or not mean, then Marlon is funny.
If there is at least one people who is not combative or not funny, then Miranda is eastern.
If there is someone who is not mean, then Braden is not aware and Jimmy is combative.
If someone is combative or aware, then he is eastern.
Neville being mean and Neville being aware imply that Braden is not funny.
Someone is mean and eastern if and only if he is elegant.
If there is at least one people who is both not elegant and not mean, then Marlon is combative.
If there is someone who is both eastern and elegant, then Braden is mean.
Miranda is not combative if and only if Neville is not elegant.
Jimmy being eastern implies that Rupert is not funny and Greyson is mean. | Greyson is aware. | contradiction |
Jimmy is not eastern.
Marlon is funny.
Greyson is elegant.
Jimmy is not combative.
Braden is funny.
Greyson is mean.
Rupert is funny.
Rupert is not combative.
Greyson is not funny.
Rupert is aware.
Braden is combative.
Braden is mean.If Neville is funny, then Jimmy is eastern and Marlon is not mean.
If someone is not mean and not aware, then he is elegant, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not aware or not mean, then Marlon is funny.
If there is at least one people who is not combative or not funny, then Miranda is eastern.
If there is someone who is not mean, then Braden is not aware and Jimmy is combative.
If someone is combative or aware, then he is eastern.
Neville being mean and Neville being aware imply that Braden is not funny.
Someone is mean and eastern if and only if he is elegant.
If there is at least one people who is both not elegant and not mean, then Marlon is combative.
If there is someone who is both eastern and elegant, then Braden is mean.
Miranda is not combative if and only if Neville is not elegant.
Jimmy being eastern implies that Rupert is not funny and Greyson is mean. | Rupert is combative. | contradiction |
Jimmy is not eastern.
Marlon is funny.
Greyson is elegant.
Jimmy is not combative.
Braden is funny.
Greyson is mean.
Rupert is funny.
Rupert is not combative.
Greyson is not funny.
Rupert is aware.
Braden is combative.
Braden is mean.If Neville is funny, then Jimmy is eastern and Marlon is not mean.
If someone is not mean and not aware, then he is elegant, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not aware or not mean, then Marlon is funny.
If there is at least one people who is not combative or not funny, then Miranda is eastern.
If there is someone who is not mean, then Braden is not aware and Jimmy is combative.
If someone is combative or aware, then he is eastern.
Neville being mean and Neville being aware imply that Braden is not funny.
Someone is mean and eastern if and only if he is elegant.
If there is at least one people who is both not elegant and not mean, then Marlon is combative.
If there is someone who is both eastern and elegant, then Braden is mean.
Miranda is not combative if and only if Neville is not elegant.
Jimmy being eastern implies that Rupert is not funny and Greyson is mean. | Braden is not mean. | self_contradiction |
Jimmy is not eastern.
Marlon is funny.
Greyson is elegant.
Jimmy is not combative.
Braden is funny.
Greyson is mean.
Rupert is funny.
Rupert is not combative.
Greyson is not funny.
Rupert is aware.
Braden is combative.
Braden is mean.If Neville is funny, then Jimmy is eastern and Marlon is not mean.
If someone is not mean and not aware, then he is elegant, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not aware or not mean, then Marlon is funny.
If there is at least one people who is not combative or not funny, then Miranda is eastern.
If there is someone who is not mean, then Braden is not aware and Jimmy is combative.
If someone is combative or aware, then he is eastern.
Neville being mean and Neville being aware imply that Braden is not funny.
Someone is mean and eastern if and only if he is elegant.
If there is at least one people who is both not elegant and not mean, then Marlon is combative.
If there is someone who is both eastern and elegant, then Braden is mean.
Miranda is not combative if and only if Neville is not elegant.
Jimmy being eastern implies that Rupert is not funny and Greyson is mean. | Greyson is not funny. | entailment |
Jesse is blue-eyed.
Lombard is not crazy.
Humphrey is not courteous.
Lombard is not placid.
Jesse is not sincere.
Humphrey is not crazy.
Shamus is not courteous.
Lombard is blue-eyed.
Lombard is sincere.
Kerry is placid.
Dave is blue-eyed.
Dave is weak.If Lombard is blue-eyed and Kerry is not courteous, then Shamus is placid and Miranda is not weak, and vice versa.
Someone who is blue-eyed is always both not sincere and not weak.
It can be concluded that Shamus is not sincere once knowing that Jesse is not weak or Shamus is not placid.
If someone is not sincere and blue-eyed, then he is both not placid and courteous, and vice versa.
All sincere people are not crazy.
It can be concluded that Lombard is blue-eyed once knowing that Kerry is placid and Jesse is crazy.
If Lombard is placid, then Kerry is weak.
Miranda being not placid is equivalent to Shamus being not sincere and Dave being not crazy.
If there is at least one people who is weak or placid, then Jesse is not crazy.
Jesse being not weak is equivalent to Shamus being crazy.
It can be concluded that Dave is not weak and Miranda is sincere once knowing that Jesse is blue-eyed.
Someone who is not sincere and blue-eyed is always not courteous and not weak. | Kerry is not crazy. | neutral |
Jesse is blue-eyed.
Lombard is not crazy.
Humphrey is not courteous.
Lombard is not placid.
Jesse is not sincere.
Humphrey is not crazy.
Shamus is not courteous.
Lombard is blue-eyed.
Lombard is sincere.
Kerry is placid.
Dave is blue-eyed.
Dave is weak.If Lombard is blue-eyed and Kerry is not courteous, then Shamus is placid and Miranda is not weak, and vice versa.
Someone who is blue-eyed is always both not sincere and not weak.
It can be concluded that Shamus is not sincere once knowing that Jesse is not weak or Shamus is not placid.
If someone is not sincere and blue-eyed, then he is both not placid and courteous, and vice versa.
All sincere people are not crazy.
It can be concluded that Lombard is blue-eyed once knowing that Kerry is placid and Jesse is crazy.
If Lombard is placid, then Kerry is weak.
Miranda being not placid is equivalent to Shamus being not sincere and Dave being not crazy.
If there is at least one people who is weak or placid, then Jesse is not crazy.
Jesse being not weak is equivalent to Shamus being crazy.
It can be concluded that Dave is not weak and Miranda is sincere once knowing that Jesse is blue-eyed.
Someone who is not sincere and blue-eyed is always not courteous and not weak. | Dave is courteous. | self_contradiction |
Jesse is blue-eyed.
Lombard is not crazy.
Humphrey is not courteous.
Lombard is not placid.
Jesse is not sincere.
Humphrey is not crazy.
Shamus is not courteous.
Lombard is blue-eyed.
Lombard is sincere.
Kerry is placid.
Dave is blue-eyed.
Dave is weak.If Lombard is blue-eyed and Kerry is not courteous, then Shamus is placid and Miranda is not weak, and vice versa.
Someone who is blue-eyed is always both not sincere and not weak.
It can be concluded that Shamus is not sincere once knowing that Jesse is not weak or Shamus is not placid.
If someone is not sincere and blue-eyed, then he is both not placid and courteous, and vice versa.
All sincere people are not crazy.
It can be concluded that Lombard is blue-eyed once knowing that Kerry is placid and Jesse is crazy.
If Lombard is placid, then Kerry is weak.
Miranda being not placid is equivalent to Shamus being not sincere and Dave being not crazy.
If there is at least one people who is weak or placid, then Jesse is not crazy.
Jesse being not weak is equivalent to Shamus being crazy.
It can be concluded that Dave is not weak and Miranda is sincere once knowing that Jesse is blue-eyed.
Someone who is not sincere and blue-eyed is always not courteous and not weak. | Jesse is not blue-eyed. | contradiction |
Jesse is blue-eyed.
Lombard is not crazy.
Humphrey is not courteous.
Lombard is not placid.
Jesse is not sincere.
Humphrey is not crazy.
Shamus is not courteous.
Lombard is blue-eyed.
Lombard is sincere.
Kerry is placid.
Dave is blue-eyed.
Dave is weak.If Lombard is blue-eyed and Kerry is not courteous, then Shamus is placid and Miranda is not weak, and vice versa.
Someone who is blue-eyed is always both not sincere and not weak.
It can be concluded that Shamus is not sincere once knowing that Jesse is not weak or Shamus is not placid.
If someone is not sincere and blue-eyed, then he is both not placid and courteous, and vice versa.
All sincere people are not crazy.
It can be concluded that Lombard is blue-eyed once knowing that Kerry is placid and Jesse is crazy.
If Lombard is placid, then Kerry is weak.
Miranda being not placid is equivalent to Shamus being not sincere and Dave being not crazy.
If there is at least one people who is weak or placid, then Jesse is not crazy.
Jesse being not weak is equivalent to Shamus being crazy.
It can be concluded that Dave is not weak and Miranda is sincere once knowing that Jesse is blue-eyed.
Someone who is not sincere and blue-eyed is always not courteous and not weak. | Dave is not crazy. | neutral |
Jesse is blue-eyed.
Lombard is not crazy.
Humphrey is not courteous.
Lombard is not placid.
Jesse is not sincere.
Humphrey is not crazy.
Shamus is not courteous.
Lombard is blue-eyed.
Lombard is sincere.
Kerry is placid.
Dave is blue-eyed.
Dave is weak.If Lombard is blue-eyed and Kerry is not courteous, then Shamus is placid and Miranda is not weak, and vice versa.
Someone who is blue-eyed is always both not sincere and not weak.
It can be concluded that Shamus is not sincere once knowing that Jesse is not weak or Shamus is not placid.
If someone is not sincere and blue-eyed, then he is both not placid and courteous, and vice versa.
All sincere people are not crazy.
It can be concluded that Lombard is blue-eyed once knowing that Kerry is placid and Jesse is crazy.
If Lombard is placid, then Kerry is weak.
Miranda being not placid is equivalent to Shamus being not sincere and Dave being not crazy.
If there is at least one people who is weak or placid, then Jesse is not crazy.
Jesse being not weak is equivalent to Shamus being crazy.
It can be concluded that Dave is not weak and Miranda is sincere once knowing that Jesse is blue-eyed.
Someone who is not sincere and blue-eyed is always not courteous and not weak. | Lombard is not blue-eyed. | contradiction |
Jesse is blue-eyed.
Lombard is not crazy.
Humphrey is not courteous.
Lombard is not placid.
Jesse is not sincere.
Humphrey is not crazy.
Shamus is not courteous.
Lombard is blue-eyed.
Lombard is sincere.
Kerry is placid.
Dave is blue-eyed.
Dave is weak.If Lombard is blue-eyed and Kerry is not courteous, then Shamus is placid and Miranda is not weak, and vice versa.
Someone who is blue-eyed is always both not sincere and not weak.
It can be concluded that Shamus is not sincere once knowing that Jesse is not weak or Shamus is not placid.
If someone is not sincere and blue-eyed, then he is both not placid and courteous, and vice versa.
All sincere people are not crazy.
It can be concluded that Lombard is blue-eyed once knowing that Kerry is placid and Jesse is crazy.
If Lombard is placid, then Kerry is weak.
Miranda being not placid is equivalent to Shamus being not sincere and Dave being not crazy.
If there is at least one people who is weak or placid, then Jesse is not crazy.
Jesse being not weak is equivalent to Shamus being crazy.
It can be concluded that Dave is not weak and Miranda is sincere once knowing that Jesse is blue-eyed.
Someone who is not sincere and blue-eyed is always not courteous and not weak. | Miranda is crazy. | contradiction |
Jesse is blue-eyed.
Lombard is not crazy.
Humphrey is not courteous.
Lombard is not placid.
Jesse is not sincere.
Humphrey is not crazy.
Shamus is not courteous.
Lombard is blue-eyed.
Lombard is sincere.
Kerry is placid.
Dave is blue-eyed.
Dave is weak.If Lombard is blue-eyed and Kerry is not courteous, then Shamus is placid and Miranda is not weak, and vice versa.
Someone who is blue-eyed is always both not sincere and not weak.
It can be concluded that Shamus is not sincere once knowing that Jesse is not weak or Shamus is not placid.
If someone is not sincere and blue-eyed, then he is both not placid and courteous, and vice versa.
All sincere people are not crazy.
It can be concluded that Lombard is blue-eyed once knowing that Kerry is placid and Jesse is crazy.
If Lombard is placid, then Kerry is weak.
Miranda being not placid is equivalent to Shamus being not sincere and Dave being not crazy.
If there is at least one people who is weak or placid, then Jesse is not crazy.
Jesse being not weak is equivalent to Shamus being crazy.
It can be concluded that Dave is not weak and Miranda is sincere once knowing that Jesse is blue-eyed.
Someone who is not sincere and blue-eyed is always not courteous and not weak. | Humphrey is placid. | neutral |
Jesse is blue-eyed.
Lombard is not crazy.
Humphrey is not courteous.
Lombard is not placid.
Jesse is not sincere.
Humphrey is not crazy.
Shamus is not courteous.
Lombard is blue-eyed.
Lombard is sincere.
Kerry is placid.
Dave is blue-eyed.
Dave is weak.If Lombard is blue-eyed and Kerry is not courteous, then Shamus is placid and Miranda is not weak, and vice versa.
Someone who is blue-eyed is always both not sincere and not weak.
It can be concluded that Shamus is not sincere once knowing that Jesse is not weak or Shamus is not placid.
If someone is not sincere and blue-eyed, then he is both not placid and courteous, and vice versa.
All sincere people are not crazy.
It can be concluded that Lombard is blue-eyed once knowing that Kerry is placid and Jesse is crazy.
If Lombard is placid, then Kerry is weak.
Miranda being not placid is equivalent to Shamus being not sincere and Dave being not crazy.
If there is at least one people who is weak or placid, then Jesse is not crazy.
Jesse being not weak is equivalent to Shamus being crazy.
It can be concluded that Dave is not weak and Miranda is sincere once knowing that Jesse is blue-eyed.
Someone who is not sincere and blue-eyed is always not courteous and not weak. | Dave is placid. | contradiction |
Jesse is blue-eyed.
Lombard is not crazy.
Humphrey is not courteous.
Lombard is not placid.
Jesse is not sincere.
Humphrey is not crazy.
Shamus is not courteous.
Lombard is blue-eyed.
Lombard is sincere.
Kerry is placid.
Dave is blue-eyed.
Dave is weak.If Lombard is blue-eyed and Kerry is not courteous, then Shamus is placid and Miranda is not weak, and vice versa.
Someone who is blue-eyed is always both not sincere and not weak.
It can be concluded that Shamus is not sincere once knowing that Jesse is not weak or Shamus is not placid.
If someone is not sincere and blue-eyed, then he is both not placid and courteous, and vice versa.
All sincere people are not crazy.
It can be concluded that Lombard is blue-eyed once knowing that Kerry is placid and Jesse is crazy.
If Lombard is placid, then Kerry is weak.
Miranda being not placid is equivalent to Shamus being not sincere and Dave being not crazy.
If there is at least one people who is weak or placid, then Jesse is not crazy.
Jesse being not weak is equivalent to Shamus being crazy.
It can be concluded that Dave is not weak and Miranda is sincere once knowing that Jesse is blue-eyed.
Someone who is not sincere and blue-eyed is always not courteous and not weak. | Dave is not courteous. | self_contradiction |
Jesse is blue-eyed.
Lombard is not crazy.
Humphrey is not courteous.
Lombard is not placid.
Jesse is not sincere.
Humphrey is not crazy.
Shamus is not courteous.
Lombard is blue-eyed.
Lombard is sincere.
Kerry is placid.
Dave is blue-eyed.
Dave is weak.If Lombard is blue-eyed and Kerry is not courteous, then Shamus is placid and Miranda is not weak, and vice versa.
Someone who is blue-eyed is always both not sincere and not weak.
It can be concluded that Shamus is not sincere once knowing that Jesse is not weak or Shamus is not placid.
If someone is not sincere and blue-eyed, then he is both not placid and courteous, and vice versa.
All sincere people are not crazy.
It can be concluded that Lombard is blue-eyed once knowing that Kerry is placid and Jesse is crazy.
If Lombard is placid, then Kerry is weak.
Miranda being not placid is equivalent to Shamus being not sincere and Dave being not crazy.
If there is at least one people who is weak or placid, then Jesse is not crazy.
Jesse being not weak is equivalent to Shamus being crazy.
It can be concluded that Dave is not weak and Miranda is sincere once knowing that Jesse is blue-eyed.
Someone who is not sincere and blue-eyed is always not courteous and not weak. | Humphrey is not placid. | neutral |
Jesse is blue-eyed.
Lombard is not crazy.
Humphrey is not courteous.
Lombard is not placid.
Jesse is not sincere.
Humphrey is not crazy.
Shamus is not courteous.
Lombard is blue-eyed.
Lombard is sincere.
Kerry is placid.
Dave is blue-eyed.
Dave is weak.If Lombard is blue-eyed and Kerry is not courteous, then Shamus is placid and Miranda is not weak, and vice versa.
Someone who is blue-eyed is always both not sincere and not weak.
It can be concluded that Shamus is not sincere once knowing that Jesse is not weak or Shamus is not placid.
If someone is not sincere and blue-eyed, then he is both not placid and courteous, and vice versa.
All sincere people are not crazy.
It can be concluded that Lombard is blue-eyed once knowing that Kerry is placid and Jesse is crazy.
If Lombard is placid, then Kerry is weak.
Miranda being not placid is equivalent to Shamus being not sincere and Dave being not crazy.
If there is at least one people who is weak or placid, then Jesse is not crazy.
Jesse being not weak is equivalent to Shamus being crazy.
It can be concluded that Dave is not weak and Miranda is sincere once knowing that Jesse is blue-eyed.
Someone who is not sincere and blue-eyed is always not courteous and not weak. | Shamus is blue-eyed. | neutral |
Jesse is blue-eyed.
Lombard is not crazy.
Humphrey is not courteous.
Lombard is not placid.
Jesse is not sincere.
Humphrey is not crazy.
Shamus is not courteous.
Lombard is blue-eyed.
Lombard is sincere.
Kerry is placid.
Dave is blue-eyed.
Dave is weak.If Lombard is blue-eyed and Kerry is not courteous, then Shamus is placid and Miranda is not weak, and vice versa.
Someone who is blue-eyed is always both not sincere and not weak.
It can be concluded that Shamus is not sincere once knowing that Jesse is not weak or Shamus is not placid.
If someone is not sincere and blue-eyed, then he is both not placid and courteous, and vice versa.
All sincere people are not crazy.
It can be concluded that Lombard is blue-eyed once knowing that Kerry is placid and Jesse is crazy.
If Lombard is placid, then Kerry is weak.
Miranda being not placid is equivalent to Shamus being not sincere and Dave being not crazy.
If there is at least one people who is weak or placid, then Jesse is not crazy.
Jesse being not weak is equivalent to Shamus being crazy.
It can be concluded that Dave is not weak and Miranda is sincere once knowing that Jesse is blue-eyed.
Someone who is not sincere and blue-eyed is always not courteous and not weak. | Lombard is not crazy. | entailment |
Jesse is blue-eyed.
Lombard is not crazy.
Humphrey is not courteous.
Lombard is not placid.
Jesse is not sincere.
Humphrey is not crazy.
Shamus is not courteous.
Lombard is blue-eyed.
Lombard is sincere.
Kerry is placid.
Dave is blue-eyed.
Dave is weak.If Lombard is blue-eyed and Kerry is not courteous, then Shamus is placid and Miranda is not weak, and vice versa.
Someone who is blue-eyed is always both not sincere and not weak.
It can be concluded that Shamus is not sincere once knowing that Jesse is not weak or Shamus is not placid.
If someone is not sincere and blue-eyed, then he is both not placid and courteous, and vice versa.
All sincere people are not crazy.
It can be concluded that Lombard is blue-eyed once knowing that Kerry is placid and Jesse is crazy.
If Lombard is placid, then Kerry is weak.
Miranda being not placid is equivalent to Shamus being not sincere and Dave being not crazy.
If there is at least one people who is weak or placid, then Jesse is not crazy.
Jesse being not weak is equivalent to Shamus being crazy.
It can be concluded that Dave is not weak and Miranda is sincere once knowing that Jesse is blue-eyed.
Someone who is not sincere and blue-eyed is always not courteous and not weak. | Shamus is not sincere. | entailment |
Jesse is blue-eyed.
Lombard is not crazy.
Humphrey is not courteous.
Lombard is not placid.
Jesse is not sincere.
Humphrey is not crazy.
Shamus is not courteous.
Lombard is blue-eyed.
Lombard is sincere.
Kerry is placid.
Dave is blue-eyed.
Dave is weak.If Lombard is blue-eyed and Kerry is not courteous, then Shamus is placid and Miranda is not weak, and vice versa.
Someone who is blue-eyed is always both not sincere and not weak.
It can be concluded that Shamus is not sincere once knowing that Jesse is not weak or Shamus is not placid.
If someone is not sincere and blue-eyed, then he is both not placid and courteous, and vice versa.
All sincere people are not crazy.
It can be concluded that Lombard is blue-eyed once knowing that Kerry is placid and Jesse is crazy.
If Lombard is placid, then Kerry is weak.
Miranda being not placid is equivalent to Shamus being not sincere and Dave being not crazy.
If there is at least one people who is weak or placid, then Jesse is not crazy.
Jesse being not weak is equivalent to Shamus being crazy.
It can be concluded that Dave is not weak and Miranda is sincere once knowing that Jesse is blue-eyed.
Someone who is not sincere and blue-eyed is always not courteous and not weak. | Humphrey is not courteous. | entailment |
Jesse is blue-eyed.
Lombard is not crazy.
Humphrey is not courteous.
Lombard is not placid.
Jesse is not sincere.
Humphrey is not crazy.
Shamus is not courteous.
Lombard is blue-eyed.
Lombard is sincere.
Kerry is placid.
Dave is blue-eyed.
Dave is weak.If Lombard is blue-eyed and Kerry is not courteous, then Shamus is placid and Miranda is not weak, and vice versa.
Someone who is blue-eyed is always both not sincere and not weak.
It can be concluded that Shamus is not sincere once knowing that Jesse is not weak or Shamus is not placid.
If someone is not sincere and blue-eyed, then he is both not placid and courteous, and vice versa.
All sincere people are not crazy.
It can be concluded that Lombard is blue-eyed once knowing that Kerry is placid and Jesse is crazy.
If Lombard is placid, then Kerry is weak.
Miranda being not placid is equivalent to Shamus being not sincere and Dave being not crazy.
If there is at least one people who is weak or placid, then Jesse is not crazy.
Jesse being not weak is equivalent to Shamus being crazy.
It can be concluded that Dave is not weak and Miranda is sincere once knowing that Jesse is blue-eyed.
Someone who is not sincere and blue-eyed is always not courteous and not weak. | Dave is not weak. | self_contradiction |
Jesse is blue-eyed.
Lombard is not crazy.
Humphrey is not courteous.
Lombard is not placid.
Jesse is not sincere.
Humphrey is not crazy.
Shamus is not courteous.
Lombard is blue-eyed.
Lombard is sincere.
Kerry is placid.
Dave is blue-eyed.
Dave is weak.If Lombard is blue-eyed and Kerry is not courteous, then Shamus is placid and Miranda is not weak, and vice versa.
Someone who is blue-eyed is always both not sincere and not weak.
It can be concluded that Shamus is not sincere once knowing that Jesse is not weak or Shamus is not placid.
If someone is not sincere and blue-eyed, then he is both not placid and courteous, and vice versa.
All sincere people are not crazy.
It can be concluded that Lombard is blue-eyed once knowing that Kerry is placid and Jesse is crazy.
If Lombard is placid, then Kerry is weak.
Miranda being not placid is equivalent to Shamus being not sincere and Dave being not crazy.
If there is at least one people who is weak or placid, then Jesse is not crazy.
Jesse being not weak is equivalent to Shamus being crazy.
It can be concluded that Dave is not weak and Miranda is sincere once knowing that Jesse is blue-eyed.
Someone who is not sincere and blue-eyed is always not courteous and not weak. | Jesse is not courteous. | self_contradiction |
Jesse is blue-eyed.
Lombard is not crazy.
Humphrey is not courteous.
Lombard is not placid.
Jesse is not sincere.
Humphrey is not crazy.
Shamus is not courteous.
Lombard is blue-eyed.
Lombard is sincere.
Kerry is placid.
Dave is blue-eyed.
Dave is weak.If Lombard is blue-eyed and Kerry is not courteous, then Shamus is placid and Miranda is not weak, and vice versa.
Someone who is blue-eyed is always both not sincere and not weak.
It can be concluded that Shamus is not sincere once knowing that Jesse is not weak or Shamus is not placid.
If someone is not sincere and blue-eyed, then he is both not placid and courteous, and vice versa.
All sincere people are not crazy.
It can be concluded that Lombard is blue-eyed once knowing that Kerry is placid and Jesse is crazy.
If Lombard is placid, then Kerry is weak.
Miranda being not placid is equivalent to Shamus being not sincere and Dave being not crazy.
If there is at least one people who is weak or placid, then Jesse is not crazy.
Jesse being not weak is equivalent to Shamus being crazy.
It can be concluded that Dave is not weak and Miranda is sincere once knowing that Jesse is blue-eyed.
Someone who is not sincere and blue-eyed is always not courteous and not weak. | Shamus is not courteous. | entailment |
Jesse is blue-eyed.
Lombard is not crazy.
Humphrey is not courteous.
Lombard is not placid.
Jesse is not sincere.
Humphrey is not crazy.
Shamus is not courteous.
Lombard is blue-eyed.
Lombard is sincere.
Kerry is placid.
Dave is blue-eyed.
Dave is weak.If Lombard is blue-eyed and Kerry is not courteous, then Shamus is placid and Miranda is not weak, and vice versa.
Someone who is blue-eyed is always both not sincere and not weak.
It can be concluded that Shamus is not sincere once knowing that Jesse is not weak or Shamus is not placid.
If someone is not sincere and blue-eyed, then he is both not placid and courteous, and vice versa.
All sincere people are not crazy.
It can be concluded that Lombard is blue-eyed once knowing that Kerry is placid and Jesse is crazy.
If Lombard is placid, then Kerry is weak.
Miranda being not placid is equivalent to Shamus being not sincere and Dave being not crazy.
If there is at least one people who is weak or placid, then Jesse is not crazy.
Jesse being not weak is equivalent to Shamus being crazy.
It can be concluded that Dave is not weak and Miranda is sincere once knowing that Jesse is blue-eyed.
Someone who is not sincere and blue-eyed is always not courteous and not weak. | Dave is not blue-eyed. | contradiction |
Jesse is blue-eyed.
Lombard is not crazy.
Humphrey is not courteous.
Lombard is not placid.
Jesse is not sincere.
Humphrey is not crazy.
Shamus is not courteous.
Lombard is blue-eyed.
Lombard is sincere.
Kerry is placid.
Dave is blue-eyed.
Dave is weak.If Lombard is blue-eyed and Kerry is not courteous, then Shamus is placid and Miranda is not weak, and vice versa.
Someone who is blue-eyed is always both not sincere and not weak.
It can be concluded that Shamus is not sincere once knowing that Jesse is not weak or Shamus is not placid.
If someone is not sincere and blue-eyed, then he is both not placid and courteous, and vice versa.
All sincere people are not crazy.
It can be concluded that Lombard is blue-eyed once knowing that Kerry is placid and Jesse is crazy.
If Lombard is placid, then Kerry is weak.
Miranda being not placid is equivalent to Shamus being not sincere and Dave being not crazy.
If there is at least one people who is weak or placid, then Jesse is not crazy.
Jesse being not weak is equivalent to Shamus being crazy.
It can be concluded that Dave is not weak and Miranda is sincere once knowing that Jesse is blue-eyed.
Someone who is not sincere and blue-eyed is always not courteous and not weak. | Lombard is sincere. | self_contradiction |
Jesse is blue-eyed.
Lombard is not crazy.
Humphrey is not courteous.
Lombard is not placid.
Jesse is not sincere.
Humphrey is not crazy.
Shamus is not courteous.
Lombard is blue-eyed.
Lombard is sincere.
Kerry is placid.
Dave is blue-eyed.
Dave is weak.If Lombard is blue-eyed and Kerry is not courteous, then Shamus is placid and Miranda is not weak, and vice versa.
Someone who is blue-eyed is always both not sincere and not weak.
It can be concluded that Shamus is not sincere once knowing that Jesse is not weak or Shamus is not placid.
If someone is not sincere and blue-eyed, then he is both not placid and courteous, and vice versa.
All sincere people are not crazy.
It can be concluded that Lombard is blue-eyed once knowing that Kerry is placid and Jesse is crazy.
If Lombard is placid, then Kerry is weak.
Miranda being not placid is equivalent to Shamus being not sincere and Dave being not crazy.
If there is at least one people who is weak or placid, then Jesse is not crazy.
Jesse being not weak is equivalent to Shamus being crazy.
It can be concluded that Dave is not weak and Miranda is sincere once knowing that Jesse is blue-eyed.
Someone who is not sincere and blue-eyed is always not courteous and not weak. | Lombard is blue-eyed. | entailment |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.