premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Lionel is not rainy.
Alisa is not nice.
Sloane is not long.
Shawn is nice.
Janet is excited.
Shawn is not handsome.
Janet is humble.
Cuthbert is long.
Tony is humble.
Alisa is not excited.
Tony is excited.
Tony is not long.If someone is either not handsome or not nice, then he is excited and not humble.
If someone is both rainy and nice, then he is not excited.
If someone who is humble is also nice, then he is handsome.
If someone is not long, then he is nice, and vice versa.
If someone is not excited, then he is both handsome and rainy.
If someone is long and not excited, then he is not humble, and vice versa.
If someone is both excited and not humble, then he is rainy.
If there is someone who is not nice, then Lionel is excited and Lionel is handsome.
Tony is rainy if and only if Alisa is not humble.
If Cuthbert is not nice or Tony is not long, then Lionel is rainy.
If there is someone who is both not rainy and excited, then Cuthbert is not handsome.
Tony being handsome implies that Janet is rainy. | Alisa is humble. | contradiction |
Lionel is not rainy.
Alisa is not nice.
Sloane is not long.
Shawn is nice.
Janet is excited.
Shawn is not handsome.
Janet is humble.
Cuthbert is long.
Tony is humble.
Alisa is not excited.
Tony is excited.
Tony is not long.If someone is either not handsome or not nice, then he is excited and not humble.
If someone is both rainy and nice, then he is not excited.
If someone who is humble is also nice, then he is handsome.
If someone is not long, then he is nice, and vice versa.
If someone is not excited, then he is both handsome and rainy.
If someone is long and not excited, then he is not humble, and vice versa.
If someone is both excited and not humble, then he is rainy.
If there is someone who is not nice, then Lionel is excited and Lionel is handsome.
Tony is rainy if and only if Alisa is not humble.
If Cuthbert is not nice or Tony is not long, then Lionel is rainy.
If there is someone who is both not rainy and excited, then Cuthbert is not handsome.
Tony being handsome implies that Janet is rainy. | Janet is not nice. | neutral |
Lionel is not rainy.
Alisa is not nice.
Sloane is not long.
Shawn is nice.
Janet is excited.
Shawn is not handsome.
Janet is humble.
Cuthbert is long.
Tony is humble.
Alisa is not excited.
Tony is excited.
Tony is not long.If someone is either not handsome or not nice, then he is excited and not humble.
If someone is both rainy and nice, then he is not excited.
If someone who is humble is also nice, then he is handsome.
If someone is not long, then he is nice, and vice versa.
If someone is not excited, then he is both handsome and rainy.
If someone is long and not excited, then he is not humble, and vice versa.
If someone is both excited and not humble, then he is rainy.
If there is someone who is not nice, then Lionel is excited and Lionel is handsome.
Tony is rainy if and only if Alisa is not humble.
If Cuthbert is not nice or Tony is not long, then Lionel is rainy.
If there is someone who is both not rainy and excited, then Cuthbert is not handsome.
Tony being handsome implies that Janet is rainy. | Lionel is not handsome. | contradiction |
Lionel is not rainy.
Alisa is not nice.
Sloane is not long.
Shawn is nice.
Janet is excited.
Shawn is not handsome.
Janet is humble.
Cuthbert is long.
Tony is humble.
Alisa is not excited.
Tony is excited.
Tony is not long.If someone is either not handsome or not nice, then he is excited and not humble.
If someone is both rainy and nice, then he is not excited.
If someone who is humble is also nice, then he is handsome.
If someone is not long, then he is nice, and vice versa.
If someone is not excited, then he is both handsome and rainy.
If someone is long and not excited, then he is not humble, and vice versa.
If someone is both excited and not humble, then he is rainy.
If there is someone who is not nice, then Lionel is excited and Lionel is handsome.
Tony is rainy if and only if Alisa is not humble.
If Cuthbert is not nice or Tony is not long, then Lionel is rainy.
If there is someone who is both not rainy and excited, then Cuthbert is not handsome.
Tony being handsome implies that Janet is rainy. | Tony is handsome. | entailment |
Lionel is not rainy.
Alisa is not nice.
Sloane is not long.
Shawn is nice.
Janet is excited.
Shawn is not handsome.
Janet is humble.
Cuthbert is long.
Tony is humble.
Alisa is not excited.
Tony is excited.
Tony is not long.If someone is either not handsome or not nice, then he is excited and not humble.
If someone is both rainy and nice, then he is not excited.
If someone who is humble is also nice, then he is handsome.
If someone is not long, then he is nice, and vice versa.
If someone is not excited, then he is both handsome and rainy.
If someone is long and not excited, then he is not humble, and vice versa.
If someone is both excited and not humble, then he is rainy.
If there is someone who is not nice, then Lionel is excited and Lionel is handsome.
Tony is rainy if and only if Alisa is not humble.
If Cuthbert is not nice or Tony is not long, then Lionel is rainy.
If there is someone who is both not rainy and excited, then Cuthbert is not handsome.
Tony being handsome implies that Janet is rainy. | Shawn is rainy. | entailment |
Lionel is not rainy.
Alisa is not nice.
Sloane is not long.
Shawn is nice.
Janet is excited.
Shawn is not handsome.
Janet is humble.
Cuthbert is long.
Tony is humble.
Alisa is not excited.
Tony is excited.
Tony is not long.If someone is either not handsome or not nice, then he is excited and not humble.
If someone is both rainy and nice, then he is not excited.
If someone who is humble is also nice, then he is handsome.
If someone is not long, then he is nice, and vice versa.
If someone is not excited, then he is both handsome and rainy.
If someone is long and not excited, then he is not humble, and vice versa.
If someone is both excited and not humble, then he is rainy.
If there is someone who is not nice, then Lionel is excited and Lionel is handsome.
Tony is rainy if and only if Alisa is not humble.
If Cuthbert is not nice or Tony is not long, then Lionel is rainy.
If there is someone who is both not rainy and excited, then Cuthbert is not handsome.
Tony being handsome implies that Janet is rainy. | Shawn is not handsome. | self_contradiction |
Lionel is not rainy.
Alisa is not nice.
Sloane is not long.
Shawn is nice.
Janet is excited.
Shawn is not handsome.
Janet is humble.
Cuthbert is long.
Tony is humble.
Alisa is not excited.
Tony is excited.
Tony is not long.If someone is either not handsome or not nice, then he is excited and not humble.
If someone is both rainy and nice, then he is not excited.
If someone who is humble is also nice, then he is handsome.
If someone is not long, then he is nice, and vice versa.
If someone is not excited, then he is both handsome and rainy.
If someone is long and not excited, then he is not humble, and vice versa.
If someone is both excited and not humble, then he is rainy.
If there is someone who is not nice, then Lionel is excited and Lionel is handsome.
Tony is rainy if and only if Alisa is not humble.
If Cuthbert is not nice or Tony is not long, then Lionel is rainy.
If there is someone who is both not rainy and excited, then Cuthbert is not handsome.
Tony being handsome implies that Janet is rainy. | Lionel is rainy. | self_contradiction |
Lionel is not rainy.
Alisa is not nice.
Sloane is not long.
Shawn is nice.
Janet is excited.
Shawn is not handsome.
Janet is humble.
Cuthbert is long.
Tony is humble.
Alisa is not excited.
Tony is excited.
Tony is not long.If someone is either not handsome or not nice, then he is excited and not humble.
If someone is both rainy and nice, then he is not excited.
If someone who is humble is also nice, then he is handsome.
If someone is not long, then he is nice, and vice versa.
If someone is not excited, then he is both handsome and rainy.
If someone is long and not excited, then he is not humble, and vice versa.
If someone is both excited and not humble, then he is rainy.
If there is someone who is not nice, then Lionel is excited and Lionel is handsome.
Tony is rainy if and only if Alisa is not humble.
If Cuthbert is not nice or Tony is not long, then Lionel is rainy.
If there is someone who is both not rainy and excited, then Cuthbert is not handsome.
Tony being handsome implies that Janet is rainy. | Alisa is handsome. | entailment |
Lionel is not rainy.
Alisa is not nice.
Sloane is not long.
Shawn is nice.
Janet is excited.
Shawn is not handsome.
Janet is humble.
Cuthbert is long.
Tony is humble.
Alisa is not excited.
Tony is excited.
Tony is not long.If someone is either not handsome or not nice, then he is excited and not humble.
If someone is both rainy and nice, then he is not excited.
If someone who is humble is also nice, then he is handsome.
If someone is not long, then he is nice, and vice versa.
If someone is not excited, then he is both handsome and rainy.
If someone is long and not excited, then he is not humble, and vice versa.
If someone is both excited and not humble, then he is rainy.
If there is someone who is not nice, then Lionel is excited and Lionel is handsome.
Tony is rainy if and only if Alisa is not humble.
If Cuthbert is not nice or Tony is not long, then Lionel is rainy.
If there is someone who is both not rainy and excited, then Cuthbert is not handsome.
Tony being handsome implies that Janet is rainy. | Sloane is not excited. | neutral |
Lionel is not rainy.
Alisa is not nice.
Sloane is not long.
Shawn is nice.
Janet is excited.
Shawn is not handsome.
Janet is humble.
Cuthbert is long.
Tony is humble.
Alisa is not excited.
Tony is excited.
Tony is not long.If someone is either not handsome or not nice, then he is excited and not humble.
If someone is both rainy and nice, then he is not excited.
If someone who is humble is also nice, then he is handsome.
If someone is not long, then he is nice, and vice versa.
If someone is not excited, then he is both handsome and rainy.
If someone is long and not excited, then he is not humble, and vice versa.
If someone is both excited and not humble, then he is rainy.
If there is someone who is not nice, then Lionel is excited and Lionel is handsome.
Tony is rainy if and only if Alisa is not humble.
If Cuthbert is not nice or Tony is not long, then Lionel is rainy.
If there is someone who is both not rainy and excited, then Cuthbert is not handsome.
Tony being handsome implies that Janet is rainy. | Tony is not nice. | contradiction |
Lionel is not rainy.
Alisa is not nice.
Sloane is not long.
Shawn is nice.
Janet is excited.
Shawn is not handsome.
Janet is humble.
Cuthbert is long.
Tony is humble.
Alisa is not excited.
Tony is excited.
Tony is not long.If someone is either not handsome or not nice, then he is excited and not humble.
If someone is both rainy and nice, then he is not excited.
If someone who is humble is also nice, then he is handsome.
If someone is not long, then he is nice, and vice versa.
If someone is not excited, then he is both handsome and rainy.
If someone is long and not excited, then he is not humble, and vice versa.
If someone is both excited and not humble, then he is rainy.
If there is someone who is not nice, then Lionel is excited and Lionel is handsome.
Tony is rainy if and only if Alisa is not humble.
If Cuthbert is not nice or Tony is not long, then Lionel is rainy.
If there is someone who is both not rainy and excited, then Cuthbert is not handsome.
Tony being handsome implies that Janet is rainy. | Shawn is long. | self_contradiction |
Lionel is not rainy.
Alisa is not nice.
Sloane is not long.
Shawn is nice.
Janet is excited.
Shawn is not handsome.
Janet is humble.
Cuthbert is long.
Tony is humble.
Alisa is not excited.
Tony is excited.
Tony is not long.If someone is either not handsome or not nice, then he is excited and not humble.
If someone is both rainy and nice, then he is not excited.
If someone who is humble is also nice, then he is handsome.
If someone is not long, then he is nice, and vice versa.
If someone is not excited, then he is both handsome and rainy.
If someone is long and not excited, then he is not humble, and vice versa.
If someone is both excited and not humble, then he is rainy.
If there is someone who is not nice, then Lionel is excited and Lionel is handsome.
Tony is rainy if and only if Alisa is not humble.
If Cuthbert is not nice or Tony is not long, then Lionel is rainy.
If there is someone who is both not rainy and excited, then Cuthbert is not handsome.
Tony being handsome implies that Janet is rainy. | Alisa is not excited. | self_contradiction |
Lionel is not rainy.
Alisa is not nice.
Sloane is not long.
Shawn is nice.
Janet is excited.
Shawn is not handsome.
Janet is humble.
Cuthbert is long.
Tony is humble.
Alisa is not excited.
Tony is excited.
Tony is not long.If someone is either not handsome or not nice, then he is excited and not humble.
If someone is both rainy and nice, then he is not excited.
If someone who is humble is also nice, then he is handsome.
If someone is not long, then he is nice, and vice versa.
If someone is not excited, then he is both handsome and rainy.
If someone is long and not excited, then he is not humble, and vice versa.
If someone is both excited and not humble, then he is rainy.
If there is someone who is not nice, then Lionel is excited and Lionel is handsome.
Tony is rainy if and only if Alisa is not humble.
If Cuthbert is not nice or Tony is not long, then Lionel is rainy.
If there is someone who is both not rainy and excited, then Cuthbert is not handsome.
Tony being handsome implies that Janet is rainy. | Sloane is not nice. | contradiction |
Lionel is not rainy.
Alisa is not nice.
Sloane is not long.
Shawn is nice.
Janet is excited.
Shawn is not handsome.
Janet is humble.
Cuthbert is long.
Tony is humble.
Alisa is not excited.
Tony is excited.
Tony is not long.If someone is either not handsome or not nice, then he is excited and not humble.
If someone is both rainy and nice, then he is not excited.
If someone who is humble is also nice, then he is handsome.
If someone is not long, then he is nice, and vice versa.
If someone is not excited, then he is both handsome and rainy.
If someone is long and not excited, then he is not humble, and vice versa.
If someone is both excited and not humble, then he is rainy.
If there is someone who is not nice, then Lionel is excited and Lionel is handsome.
Tony is rainy if and only if Alisa is not humble.
If Cuthbert is not nice or Tony is not long, then Lionel is rainy.
If there is someone who is both not rainy and excited, then Cuthbert is not handsome.
Tony being handsome implies that Janet is rainy. | Tony is excited. | self_contradiction |
Lionel is not rainy.
Alisa is not nice.
Sloane is not long.
Shawn is nice.
Janet is excited.
Shawn is not handsome.
Janet is humble.
Cuthbert is long.
Tony is humble.
Alisa is not excited.
Tony is excited.
Tony is not long.If someone is either not handsome or not nice, then he is excited and not humble.
If someone is both rainy and nice, then he is not excited.
If someone who is humble is also nice, then he is handsome.
If someone is not long, then he is nice, and vice versa.
If someone is not excited, then he is both handsome and rainy.
If someone is long and not excited, then he is not humble, and vice versa.
If someone is both excited and not humble, then he is rainy.
If there is someone who is not nice, then Lionel is excited and Lionel is handsome.
Tony is rainy if and only if Alisa is not humble.
If Cuthbert is not nice or Tony is not long, then Lionel is rainy.
If there is someone who is both not rainy and excited, then Cuthbert is not handsome.
Tony being handsome implies that Janet is rainy. | Cuthbert is long. | entailment |
Lionel is not rainy.
Alisa is not nice.
Sloane is not long.
Shawn is nice.
Janet is excited.
Shawn is not handsome.
Janet is humble.
Cuthbert is long.
Tony is humble.
Alisa is not excited.
Tony is excited.
Tony is not long.If someone is either not handsome or not nice, then he is excited and not humble.
If someone is both rainy and nice, then he is not excited.
If someone who is humble is also nice, then he is handsome.
If someone is not long, then he is nice, and vice versa.
If someone is not excited, then he is both handsome and rainy.
If someone is long and not excited, then he is not humble, and vice versa.
If someone is both excited and not humble, then he is rainy.
If there is someone who is not nice, then Lionel is excited and Lionel is handsome.
Tony is rainy if and only if Alisa is not humble.
If Cuthbert is not nice or Tony is not long, then Lionel is rainy.
If there is someone who is both not rainy and excited, then Cuthbert is not handsome.
Tony being handsome implies that Janet is rainy. | Cuthbert is nice. | neutral |
Lionel is not rainy.
Alisa is not nice.
Sloane is not long.
Shawn is nice.
Janet is excited.
Shawn is not handsome.
Janet is humble.
Cuthbert is long.
Tony is humble.
Alisa is not excited.
Tony is excited.
Tony is not long.If someone is either not handsome or not nice, then he is excited and not humble.
If someone is both rainy and nice, then he is not excited.
If someone who is humble is also nice, then he is handsome.
If someone is not long, then he is nice, and vice versa.
If someone is not excited, then he is both handsome and rainy.
If someone is long and not excited, then he is not humble, and vice versa.
If someone is both excited and not humble, then he is rainy.
If there is someone who is not nice, then Lionel is excited and Lionel is handsome.
Tony is rainy if and only if Alisa is not humble.
If Cuthbert is not nice or Tony is not long, then Lionel is rainy.
If there is someone who is both not rainy and excited, then Cuthbert is not handsome.
Tony being handsome implies that Janet is rainy. | Sloane is not rainy. | neutral |
Lionel is not rainy.
Alisa is not nice.
Sloane is not long.
Shawn is nice.
Janet is excited.
Shawn is not handsome.
Janet is humble.
Cuthbert is long.
Tony is humble.
Alisa is not excited.
Tony is excited.
Tony is not long.If someone is either not handsome or not nice, then he is excited and not humble.
If someone is both rainy and nice, then he is not excited.
If someone who is humble is also nice, then he is handsome.
If someone is not long, then he is nice, and vice versa.
If someone is not excited, then he is both handsome and rainy.
If someone is long and not excited, then he is not humble, and vice versa.
If someone is both excited and not humble, then he is rainy.
If there is someone who is not nice, then Lionel is excited and Lionel is handsome.
Tony is rainy if and only if Alisa is not humble.
If Cuthbert is not nice or Tony is not long, then Lionel is rainy.
If there is someone who is both not rainy and excited, then Cuthbert is not handsome.
Tony being handsome implies that Janet is rainy. | Lionel is excited. | entailment |
Lionel is not rainy.
Alisa is not nice.
Sloane is not long.
Shawn is nice.
Janet is excited.
Shawn is not handsome.
Janet is humble.
Cuthbert is long.
Tony is humble.
Alisa is not excited.
Tony is excited.
Tony is not long.If someone is either not handsome or not nice, then he is excited and not humble.
If someone is both rainy and nice, then he is not excited.
If someone who is humble is also nice, then he is handsome.
If someone is not long, then he is nice, and vice versa.
If someone is not excited, then he is both handsome and rainy.
If someone is long and not excited, then he is not humble, and vice versa.
If someone is both excited and not humble, then he is rainy.
If there is someone who is not nice, then Lionel is excited and Lionel is handsome.
Tony is rainy if and only if Alisa is not humble.
If Cuthbert is not nice or Tony is not long, then Lionel is rainy.
If there is someone who is both not rainy and excited, then Cuthbert is not handsome.
Tony being handsome implies that Janet is rainy. | Cuthbert is not long. | contradiction |
Lionel is not rainy.
Alisa is not nice.
Sloane is not long.
Shawn is nice.
Janet is excited.
Shawn is not handsome.
Janet is humble.
Cuthbert is long.
Tony is humble.
Alisa is not excited.
Tony is excited.
Tony is not long.If someone is either not handsome or not nice, then he is excited and not humble.
If someone is both rainy and nice, then he is not excited.
If someone who is humble is also nice, then he is handsome.
If someone is not long, then he is nice, and vice versa.
If someone is not excited, then he is both handsome and rainy.
If someone is long and not excited, then he is not humble, and vice versa.
If someone is both excited and not humble, then he is rainy.
If there is someone who is not nice, then Lionel is excited and Lionel is handsome.
Tony is rainy if and only if Alisa is not humble.
If Cuthbert is not nice or Tony is not long, then Lionel is rainy.
If there is someone who is both not rainy and excited, then Cuthbert is not handsome.
Tony being handsome implies that Janet is rainy. | Janet is long. | neutral |
Alexia is dynamic.
Melville is smart.
Maddox is not attentive.
Chrysta is not dynamic.
Marlon is not dynamic.
Claude is not afraid.
Chrysta is not smart.
Alexia is not afraid.
Maddox is afraid.
Shamus is smart.
Claude is dynamic.
Alexia is smart.If someone is attentive or brown, then he is afraid.
If someone is not afraid and dynamic, then he is attentive, and vice versa.
If someone is afraid and not attentive, then he is dynamic, and vice versa.
Marlon being attentive implies that Chrysta is successful and Claude is afraid.
If there is someone who is attentive, then Shamus is not dynamic and Shamus is not smart.
If Claude is not smart or Shamus is not dynamic, then Melville is successful.
If someone is not afraid or not dynamic, then he is not attentive.
If someone is both not successful and not brown, then he is afraid.
It can be concluded that Claude is dynamic once knowing that Marlon is afraid and Alexia is not brown.
As long as someone is not brown, he is not successful and dynamic.
If all people are not dynamic, then Maddox is not afraid.
If there is at least one people who is not successful or dynamic, then Alexia is not brown. | Melville is dynamic. | neutral |
Alexia is dynamic.
Melville is smart.
Maddox is not attentive.
Chrysta is not dynamic.
Marlon is not dynamic.
Claude is not afraid.
Chrysta is not smart.
Alexia is not afraid.
Maddox is afraid.
Shamus is smart.
Claude is dynamic.
Alexia is smart.If someone is attentive or brown, then he is afraid.
If someone is not afraid and dynamic, then he is attentive, and vice versa.
If someone is afraid and not attentive, then he is dynamic, and vice versa.
Marlon being attentive implies that Chrysta is successful and Claude is afraid.
If there is someone who is attentive, then Shamus is not dynamic and Shamus is not smart.
If Claude is not smart or Shamus is not dynamic, then Melville is successful.
If someone is not afraid or not dynamic, then he is not attentive.
If someone is both not successful and not brown, then he is afraid.
It can be concluded that Claude is dynamic once knowing that Marlon is afraid and Alexia is not brown.
As long as someone is not brown, he is not successful and dynamic.
If all people are not dynamic, then Maddox is not afraid.
If there is at least one people who is not successful or dynamic, then Alexia is not brown. | Maddox is brown. | neutral |
Alexia is dynamic.
Melville is smart.
Maddox is not attentive.
Chrysta is not dynamic.
Marlon is not dynamic.
Claude is not afraid.
Chrysta is not smart.
Alexia is not afraid.
Maddox is afraid.
Shamus is smart.
Claude is dynamic.
Alexia is smart.If someone is attentive or brown, then he is afraid.
If someone is not afraid and dynamic, then he is attentive, and vice versa.
If someone is afraid and not attentive, then he is dynamic, and vice versa.
Marlon being attentive implies that Chrysta is successful and Claude is afraid.
If there is someone who is attentive, then Shamus is not dynamic and Shamus is not smart.
If Claude is not smart or Shamus is not dynamic, then Melville is successful.
If someone is not afraid or not dynamic, then he is not attentive.
If someone is both not successful and not brown, then he is afraid.
It can be concluded that Claude is dynamic once knowing that Marlon is afraid and Alexia is not brown.
As long as someone is not brown, he is not successful and dynamic.
If all people are not dynamic, then Maddox is not afraid.
If there is at least one people who is not successful or dynamic, then Alexia is not brown. | Claude is not attentive. | self_contradiction |
Alexia is dynamic.
Melville is smart.
Maddox is not attentive.
Chrysta is not dynamic.
Marlon is not dynamic.
Claude is not afraid.
Chrysta is not smart.
Alexia is not afraid.
Maddox is afraid.
Shamus is smart.
Claude is dynamic.
Alexia is smart.If someone is attentive or brown, then he is afraid.
If someone is not afraid and dynamic, then he is attentive, and vice versa.
If someone is afraid and not attentive, then he is dynamic, and vice versa.
Marlon being attentive implies that Chrysta is successful and Claude is afraid.
If there is someone who is attentive, then Shamus is not dynamic and Shamus is not smart.
If Claude is not smart or Shamus is not dynamic, then Melville is successful.
If someone is not afraid or not dynamic, then he is not attentive.
If someone is both not successful and not brown, then he is afraid.
It can be concluded that Claude is dynamic once knowing that Marlon is afraid and Alexia is not brown.
As long as someone is not brown, he is not successful and dynamic.
If all people are not dynamic, then Maddox is not afraid.
If there is at least one people who is not successful or dynamic, then Alexia is not brown. | Shamus is not attentive. | entailment |
Alexia is dynamic.
Melville is smart.
Maddox is not attentive.
Chrysta is not dynamic.
Marlon is not dynamic.
Claude is not afraid.
Chrysta is not smart.
Alexia is not afraid.
Maddox is afraid.
Shamus is smart.
Claude is dynamic.
Alexia is smart.If someone is attentive or brown, then he is afraid.
If someone is not afraid and dynamic, then he is attentive, and vice versa.
If someone is afraid and not attentive, then he is dynamic, and vice versa.
Marlon being attentive implies that Chrysta is successful and Claude is afraid.
If there is someone who is attentive, then Shamus is not dynamic and Shamus is not smart.
If Claude is not smart or Shamus is not dynamic, then Melville is successful.
If someone is not afraid or not dynamic, then he is not attentive.
If someone is both not successful and not brown, then he is afraid.
It can be concluded that Claude is dynamic once knowing that Marlon is afraid and Alexia is not brown.
As long as someone is not brown, he is not successful and dynamic.
If all people are not dynamic, then Maddox is not afraid.
If there is at least one people who is not successful or dynamic, then Alexia is not brown. | Chrysta is not dynamic. | entailment |
Alexia is dynamic.
Melville is smart.
Maddox is not attentive.
Chrysta is not dynamic.
Marlon is not dynamic.
Claude is not afraid.
Chrysta is not smart.
Alexia is not afraid.
Maddox is afraid.
Shamus is smart.
Claude is dynamic.
Alexia is smart.If someone is attentive or brown, then he is afraid.
If someone is not afraid and dynamic, then he is attentive, and vice versa.
If someone is afraid and not attentive, then he is dynamic, and vice versa.
Marlon being attentive implies that Chrysta is successful and Claude is afraid.
If there is someone who is attentive, then Shamus is not dynamic and Shamus is not smart.
If Claude is not smart or Shamus is not dynamic, then Melville is successful.
If someone is not afraid or not dynamic, then he is not attentive.
If someone is both not successful and not brown, then he is afraid.
It can be concluded that Claude is dynamic once knowing that Marlon is afraid and Alexia is not brown.
As long as someone is not brown, he is not successful and dynamic.
If all people are not dynamic, then Maddox is not afraid.
If there is at least one people who is not successful or dynamic, then Alexia is not brown. | Claude is not afraid. | self_contradiction |
Alexia is dynamic.
Melville is smart.
Maddox is not attentive.
Chrysta is not dynamic.
Marlon is not dynamic.
Claude is not afraid.
Chrysta is not smart.
Alexia is not afraid.
Maddox is afraid.
Shamus is smart.
Claude is dynamic.
Alexia is smart.If someone is attentive or brown, then he is afraid.
If someone is not afraid and dynamic, then he is attentive, and vice versa.
If someone is afraid and not attentive, then he is dynamic, and vice versa.
Marlon being attentive implies that Chrysta is successful and Claude is afraid.
If there is someone who is attentive, then Shamus is not dynamic and Shamus is not smart.
If Claude is not smart or Shamus is not dynamic, then Melville is successful.
If someone is not afraid or not dynamic, then he is not attentive.
If someone is both not successful and not brown, then he is afraid.
It can be concluded that Claude is dynamic once knowing that Marlon is afraid and Alexia is not brown.
As long as someone is not brown, he is not successful and dynamic.
If all people are not dynamic, then Maddox is not afraid.
If there is at least one people who is not successful or dynamic, then Alexia is not brown. | Melville is not dynamic. | neutral |
Alexia is dynamic.
Melville is smart.
Maddox is not attentive.
Chrysta is not dynamic.
Marlon is not dynamic.
Claude is not afraid.
Chrysta is not smart.
Alexia is not afraid.
Maddox is afraid.
Shamus is smart.
Claude is dynamic.
Alexia is smart.If someone is attentive or brown, then he is afraid.
If someone is not afraid and dynamic, then he is attentive, and vice versa.
If someone is afraid and not attentive, then he is dynamic, and vice versa.
Marlon being attentive implies that Chrysta is successful and Claude is afraid.
If there is someone who is attentive, then Shamus is not dynamic and Shamus is not smart.
If Claude is not smart or Shamus is not dynamic, then Melville is successful.
If someone is not afraid or not dynamic, then he is not attentive.
If someone is both not successful and not brown, then he is afraid.
It can be concluded that Claude is dynamic once knowing that Marlon is afraid and Alexia is not brown.
As long as someone is not brown, he is not successful and dynamic.
If all people are not dynamic, then Maddox is not afraid.
If there is at least one people who is not successful or dynamic, then Alexia is not brown. | Chrysta is not smart. | entailment |
Alexia is dynamic.
Melville is smart.
Maddox is not attentive.
Chrysta is not dynamic.
Marlon is not dynamic.
Claude is not afraid.
Chrysta is not smart.
Alexia is not afraid.
Maddox is afraid.
Shamus is smart.
Claude is dynamic.
Alexia is smart.If someone is attentive or brown, then he is afraid.
If someone is not afraid and dynamic, then he is attentive, and vice versa.
If someone is afraid and not attentive, then he is dynamic, and vice versa.
Marlon being attentive implies that Chrysta is successful and Claude is afraid.
If there is someone who is attentive, then Shamus is not dynamic and Shamus is not smart.
If Claude is not smart or Shamus is not dynamic, then Melville is successful.
If someone is not afraid or not dynamic, then he is not attentive.
If someone is both not successful and not brown, then he is afraid.
It can be concluded that Claude is dynamic once knowing that Marlon is afraid and Alexia is not brown.
As long as someone is not brown, he is not successful and dynamic.
If all people are not dynamic, then Maddox is not afraid.
If there is at least one people who is not successful or dynamic, then Alexia is not brown. | Shamus is not successful. | neutral |
Alexia is dynamic.
Melville is smart.
Maddox is not attentive.
Chrysta is not dynamic.
Marlon is not dynamic.
Claude is not afraid.
Chrysta is not smart.
Alexia is not afraid.
Maddox is afraid.
Shamus is smart.
Claude is dynamic.
Alexia is smart.If someone is attentive or brown, then he is afraid.
If someone is not afraid and dynamic, then he is attentive, and vice versa.
If someone is afraid and not attentive, then he is dynamic, and vice versa.
Marlon being attentive implies that Chrysta is successful and Claude is afraid.
If there is someone who is attentive, then Shamus is not dynamic and Shamus is not smart.
If Claude is not smart or Shamus is not dynamic, then Melville is successful.
If someone is not afraid or not dynamic, then he is not attentive.
If someone is both not successful and not brown, then he is afraid.
It can be concluded that Claude is dynamic once knowing that Marlon is afraid and Alexia is not brown.
As long as someone is not brown, he is not successful and dynamic.
If all people are not dynamic, then Maddox is not afraid.
If there is at least one people who is not successful or dynamic, then Alexia is not brown. | Alexia is attentive. | self_contradiction |
Alexia is dynamic.
Melville is smart.
Maddox is not attentive.
Chrysta is not dynamic.
Marlon is not dynamic.
Claude is not afraid.
Chrysta is not smart.
Alexia is not afraid.
Maddox is afraid.
Shamus is smart.
Claude is dynamic.
Alexia is smart.If someone is attentive or brown, then he is afraid.
If someone is not afraid and dynamic, then he is attentive, and vice versa.
If someone is afraid and not attentive, then he is dynamic, and vice versa.
Marlon being attentive implies that Chrysta is successful and Claude is afraid.
If there is someone who is attentive, then Shamus is not dynamic and Shamus is not smart.
If Claude is not smart or Shamus is not dynamic, then Melville is successful.
If someone is not afraid or not dynamic, then he is not attentive.
If someone is both not successful and not brown, then he is afraid.
It can be concluded that Claude is dynamic once knowing that Marlon is afraid and Alexia is not brown.
As long as someone is not brown, he is not successful and dynamic.
If all people are not dynamic, then Maddox is not afraid.
If there is at least one people who is not successful or dynamic, then Alexia is not brown. | Shamus is successful. | neutral |
Alexia is dynamic.
Melville is smart.
Maddox is not attentive.
Chrysta is not dynamic.
Marlon is not dynamic.
Claude is not afraid.
Chrysta is not smart.
Alexia is not afraid.
Maddox is afraid.
Shamus is smart.
Claude is dynamic.
Alexia is smart.If someone is attentive or brown, then he is afraid.
If someone is not afraid and dynamic, then he is attentive, and vice versa.
If someone is afraid and not attentive, then he is dynamic, and vice versa.
Marlon being attentive implies that Chrysta is successful and Claude is afraid.
If there is someone who is attentive, then Shamus is not dynamic and Shamus is not smart.
If Claude is not smart or Shamus is not dynamic, then Melville is successful.
If someone is not afraid or not dynamic, then he is not attentive.
If someone is both not successful and not brown, then he is afraid.
It can be concluded that Claude is dynamic once knowing that Marlon is afraid and Alexia is not brown.
As long as someone is not brown, he is not successful and dynamic.
If all people are not dynamic, then Maddox is not afraid.
If there is at least one people who is not successful or dynamic, then Alexia is not brown. | Chrysta is attentive. | contradiction |
Alexia is dynamic.
Melville is smart.
Maddox is not attentive.
Chrysta is not dynamic.
Marlon is not dynamic.
Claude is not afraid.
Chrysta is not smart.
Alexia is not afraid.
Maddox is afraid.
Shamus is smart.
Claude is dynamic.
Alexia is smart.If someone is attentive or brown, then he is afraid.
If someone is not afraid and dynamic, then he is attentive, and vice versa.
If someone is afraid and not attentive, then he is dynamic, and vice versa.
Marlon being attentive implies that Chrysta is successful and Claude is afraid.
If there is someone who is attentive, then Shamus is not dynamic and Shamus is not smart.
If Claude is not smart or Shamus is not dynamic, then Melville is successful.
If someone is not afraid or not dynamic, then he is not attentive.
If someone is both not successful and not brown, then he is afraid.
It can be concluded that Claude is dynamic once knowing that Marlon is afraid and Alexia is not brown.
As long as someone is not brown, he is not successful and dynamic.
If all people are not dynamic, then Maddox is not afraid.
If there is at least one people who is not successful or dynamic, then Alexia is not brown. | Shamus is attentive. | contradiction |
Alexia is dynamic.
Melville is smart.
Maddox is not attentive.
Chrysta is not dynamic.
Marlon is not dynamic.
Claude is not afraid.
Chrysta is not smart.
Alexia is not afraid.
Maddox is afraid.
Shamus is smart.
Claude is dynamic.
Alexia is smart.If someone is attentive or brown, then he is afraid.
If someone is not afraid and dynamic, then he is attentive, and vice versa.
If someone is afraid and not attentive, then he is dynamic, and vice versa.
Marlon being attentive implies that Chrysta is successful and Claude is afraid.
If there is someone who is attentive, then Shamus is not dynamic and Shamus is not smart.
If Claude is not smart or Shamus is not dynamic, then Melville is successful.
If someone is not afraid or not dynamic, then he is not attentive.
If someone is both not successful and not brown, then he is afraid.
It can be concluded that Claude is dynamic once knowing that Marlon is afraid and Alexia is not brown.
As long as someone is not brown, he is not successful and dynamic.
If all people are not dynamic, then Maddox is not afraid.
If there is at least one people who is not successful or dynamic, then Alexia is not brown. | Maddox is not afraid. | contradiction |
Alexia is dynamic.
Melville is smart.
Maddox is not attentive.
Chrysta is not dynamic.
Marlon is not dynamic.
Claude is not afraid.
Chrysta is not smart.
Alexia is not afraid.
Maddox is afraid.
Shamus is smart.
Claude is dynamic.
Alexia is smart.If someone is attentive or brown, then he is afraid.
If someone is not afraid and dynamic, then he is attentive, and vice versa.
If someone is afraid and not attentive, then he is dynamic, and vice versa.
Marlon being attentive implies that Chrysta is successful and Claude is afraid.
If there is someone who is attentive, then Shamus is not dynamic and Shamus is not smart.
If Claude is not smart or Shamus is not dynamic, then Melville is successful.
If someone is not afraid or not dynamic, then he is not attentive.
If someone is both not successful and not brown, then he is afraid.
It can be concluded that Claude is dynamic once knowing that Marlon is afraid and Alexia is not brown.
As long as someone is not brown, he is not successful and dynamic.
If all people are not dynamic, then Maddox is not afraid.
If there is at least one people who is not successful or dynamic, then Alexia is not brown. | Maddox is not attentive. | entailment |
Alexia is dynamic.
Melville is smart.
Maddox is not attentive.
Chrysta is not dynamic.
Marlon is not dynamic.
Claude is not afraid.
Chrysta is not smart.
Alexia is not afraid.
Maddox is afraid.
Shamus is smart.
Claude is dynamic.
Alexia is smart.If someone is attentive or brown, then he is afraid.
If someone is not afraid and dynamic, then he is attentive, and vice versa.
If someone is afraid and not attentive, then he is dynamic, and vice versa.
Marlon being attentive implies that Chrysta is successful and Claude is afraid.
If there is someone who is attentive, then Shamus is not dynamic and Shamus is not smart.
If Claude is not smart or Shamus is not dynamic, then Melville is successful.
If someone is not afraid or not dynamic, then he is not attentive.
If someone is both not successful and not brown, then he is afraid.
It can be concluded that Claude is dynamic once knowing that Marlon is afraid and Alexia is not brown.
As long as someone is not brown, he is not successful and dynamic.
If all people are not dynamic, then Maddox is not afraid.
If there is at least one people who is not successful or dynamic, then Alexia is not brown. | Alexia is not attentive. | self_contradiction |
Alexia is dynamic.
Melville is smart.
Maddox is not attentive.
Chrysta is not dynamic.
Marlon is not dynamic.
Claude is not afraid.
Chrysta is not smart.
Alexia is not afraid.
Maddox is afraid.
Shamus is smart.
Claude is dynamic.
Alexia is smart.If someone is attentive or brown, then he is afraid.
If someone is not afraid and dynamic, then he is attentive, and vice versa.
If someone is afraid and not attentive, then he is dynamic, and vice versa.
Marlon being attentive implies that Chrysta is successful and Claude is afraid.
If there is someone who is attentive, then Shamus is not dynamic and Shamus is not smart.
If Claude is not smart or Shamus is not dynamic, then Melville is successful.
If someone is not afraid or not dynamic, then he is not attentive.
If someone is both not successful and not brown, then he is afraid.
It can be concluded that Claude is dynamic once knowing that Marlon is afraid and Alexia is not brown.
As long as someone is not brown, he is not successful and dynamic.
If all people are not dynamic, then Maddox is not afraid.
If there is at least one people who is not successful or dynamic, then Alexia is not brown. | Shamus is not dynamic. | entailment |
Alexia is dynamic.
Melville is smart.
Maddox is not attentive.
Chrysta is not dynamic.
Marlon is not dynamic.
Claude is not afraid.
Chrysta is not smart.
Alexia is not afraid.
Maddox is afraid.
Shamus is smart.
Claude is dynamic.
Alexia is smart.If someone is attentive or brown, then he is afraid.
If someone is not afraid and dynamic, then he is attentive, and vice versa.
If someone is afraid and not attentive, then he is dynamic, and vice versa.
Marlon being attentive implies that Chrysta is successful and Claude is afraid.
If there is someone who is attentive, then Shamus is not dynamic and Shamus is not smart.
If Claude is not smart or Shamus is not dynamic, then Melville is successful.
If someone is not afraid or not dynamic, then he is not attentive.
If someone is both not successful and not brown, then he is afraid.
It can be concluded that Claude is dynamic once knowing that Marlon is afraid and Alexia is not brown.
As long as someone is not brown, he is not successful and dynamic.
If all people are not dynamic, then Maddox is not afraid.
If there is at least one people who is not successful or dynamic, then Alexia is not brown. | Alexia is afraid. | self_contradiction |
Alexia is dynamic.
Melville is smart.
Maddox is not attentive.
Chrysta is not dynamic.
Marlon is not dynamic.
Claude is not afraid.
Chrysta is not smart.
Alexia is not afraid.
Maddox is afraid.
Shamus is smart.
Claude is dynamic.
Alexia is smart.If someone is attentive or brown, then he is afraid.
If someone is not afraid and dynamic, then he is attentive, and vice versa.
If someone is afraid and not attentive, then he is dynamic, and vice versa.
Marlon being attentive implies that Chrysta is successful and Claude is afraid.
If there is someone who is attentive, then Shamus is not dynamic and Shamus is not smart.
If Claude is not smart or Shamus is not dynamic, then Melville is successful.
If someone is not afraid or not dynamic, then he is not attentive.
If someone is both not successful and not brown, then he is afraid.
It can be concluded that Claude is dynamic once knowing that Marlon is afraid and Alexia is not brown.
As long as someone is not brown, he is not successful and dynamic.
If all people are not dynamic, then Maddox is not afraid.
If there is at least one people who is not successful or dynamic, then Alexia is not brown. | Chrysta is smart. | contradiction |
Alexia is dynamic.
Melville is smart.
Maddox is not attentive.
Chrysta is not dynamic.
Marlon is not dynamic.
Claude is not afraid.
Chrysta is not smart.
Alexia is not afraid.
Maddox is afraid.
Shamus is smart.
Claude is dynamic.
Alexia is smart.If someone is attentive or brown, then he is afraid.
If someone is not afraid and dynamic, then he is attentive, and vice versa.
If someone is afraid and not attentive, then he is dynamic, and vice versa.
Marlon being attentive implies that Chrysta is successful and Claude is afraid.
If there is someone who is attentive, then Shamus is not dynamic and Shamus is not smart.
If Claude is not smart or Shamus is not dynamic, then Melville is successful.
If someone is not afraid or not dynamic, then he is not attentive.
If someone is both not successful and not brown, then he is afraid.
It can be concluded that Claude is dynamic once knowing that Marlon is afraid and Alexia is not brown.
As long as someone is not brown, he is not successful and dynamic.
If all people are not dynamic, then Maddox is not afraid.
If there is at least one people who is not successful or dynamic, then Alexia is not brown. | Alexia is brown. | contradiction |
Bruce is obedient.
Jarvis is yellow.
Jarvis is not black.
Bruce is not handsome.
Norman is handsome.
Barclay is yellow.
Barclay is obedient.
Traci is not obedient.
Lauren is not black.
Barclay is black.
Traci is open.
Barclay is not massive.As long as someone is obedient, he is not massive and handsome.
If someone is not handsome, then he is obedient, and vice versa.
Someone who is obedient is always both not black and massive.
Someone being both obedient and not yellow is equivalent to being not black.
Someone who is not yellow and massive is always not open and handsome.
Someone being both handsome and not open is equivalent to being massive and yellow.
If there is someone who is either black or handsome, then Barclay is not massive.
If Traci is not yellow and Lauren is not massive, then Jarvis is not obedient.
If there is at least one people who is black, then Bruce is not handsome.
If someone is massive, then he is black.
If someone is yellow, then he is not black, and vice versa.
Lauren being not open is equivalent to Norman being not yellow and Jarvis being not obedient. | Bruce is handsome. | self_contradiction |
Bruce is obedient.
Jarvis is yellow.
Jarvis is not black.
Bruce is not handsome.
Norman is handsome.
Barclay is yellow.
Barclay is obedient.
Traci is not obedient.
Lauren is not black.
Barclay is black.
Traci is open.
Barclay is not massive.As long as someone is obedient, he is not massive and handsome.
If someone is not handsome, then he is obedient, and vice versa.
Someone who is obedient is always both not black and massive.
Someone being both obedient and not yellow is equivalent to being not black.
Someone who is not yellow and massive is always not open and handsome.
Someone being both handsome and not open is equivalent to being massive and yellow.
If there is someone who is either black or handsome, then Barclay is not massive.
If Traci is not yellow and Lauren is not massive, then Jarvis is not obedient.
If there is at least one people who is black, then Bruce is not handsome.
If someone is massive, then he is black.
If someone is yellow, then he is not black, and vice versa.
Lauren being not open is equivalent to Norman being not yellow and Jarvis being not obedient. | Lauren is not open. | entailment |
Bruce is obedient.
Jarvis is yellow.
Jarvis is not black.
Bruce is not handsome.
Norman is handsome.
Barclay is yellow.
Barclay is obedient.
Traci is not obedient.
Lauren is not black.
Barclay is black.
Traci is open.
Barclay is not massive.As long as someone is obedient, he is not massive and handsome.
If someone is not handsome, then he is obedient, and vice versa.
Someone who is obedient is always both not black and massive.
Someone being both obedient and not yellow is equivalent to being not black.
Someone who is not yellow and massive is always not open and handsome.
Someone being both handsome and not open is equivalent to being massive and yellow.
If there is someone who is either black or handsome, then Barclay is not massive.
If Traci is not yellow and Lauren is not massive, then Jarvis is not obedient.
If there is at least one people who is black, then Bruce is not handsome.
If someone is massive, then he is black.
If someone is yellow, then he is not black, and vice versa.
Lauren being not open is equivalent to Norman being not yellow and Jarvis being not obedient. | Traci is open. | entailment |
Bruce is obedient.
Jarvis is yellow.
Jarvis is not black.
Bruce is not handsome.
Norman is handsome.
Barclay is yellow.
Barclay is obedient.
Traci is not obedient.
Lauren is not black.
Barclay is black.
Traci is open.
Barclay is not massive.As long as someone is obedient, he is not massive and handsome.
If someone is not handsome, then he is obedient, and vice versa.
Someone who is obedient is always both not black and massive.
Someone being both obedient and not yellow is equivalent to being not black.
Someone who is not yellow and massive is always not open and handsome.
Someone being both handsome and not open is equivalent to being massive and yellow.
If there is someone who is either black or handsome, then Barclay is not massive.
If Traci is not yellow and Lauren is not massive, then Jarvis is not obedient.
If there is at least one people who is black, then Bruce is not handsome.
If someone is massive, then he is black.
If someone is yellow, then he is not black, and vice versa.
Lauren being not open is equivalent to Norman being not yellow and Jarvis being not obedient. | Jarvis is open. | contradiction |
Bruce is obedient.
Jarvis is yellow.
Jarvis is not black.
Bruce is not handsome.
Norman is handsome.
Barclay is yellow.
Barclay is obedient.
Traci is not obedient.
Lauren is not black.
Barclay is black.
Traci is open.
Barclay is not massive.As long as someone is obedient, he is not massive and handsome.
If someone is not handsome, then he is obedient, and vice versa.
Someone who is obedient is always both not black and massive.
Someone being both obedient and not yellow is equivalent to being not black.
Someone who is not yellow and massive is always not open and handsome.
Someone being both handsome and not open is equivalent to being massive and yellow.
If there is someone who is either black or handsome, then Barclay is not massive.
If Traci is not yellow and Lauren is not massive, then Jarvis is not obedient.
If there is at least one people who is black, then Bruce is not handsome.
If someone is massive, then he is black.
If someone is yellow, then he is not black, and vice versa.
Lauren being not open is equivalent to Norman being not yellow and Jarvis being not obedient. | Bruce is black. | self_contradiction |
Bruce is obedient.
Jarvis is yellow.
Jarvis is not black.
Bruce is not handsome.
Norman is handsome.
Barclay is yellow.
Barclay is obedient.
Traci is not obedient.
Lauren is not black.
Barclay is black.
Traci is open.
Barclay is not massive.As long as someone is obedient, he is not massive and handsome.
If someone is not handsome, then he is obedient, and vice versa.
Someone who is obedient is always both not black and massive.
Someone being both obedient and not yellow is equivalent to being not black.
Someone who is not yellow and massive is always not open and handsome.
Someone being both handsome and not open is equivalent to being massive and yellow.
If there is someone who is either black or handsome, then Barclay is not massive.
If Traci is not yellow and Lauren is not massive, then Jarvis is not obedient.
If there is at least one people who is black, then Bruce is not handsome.
If someone is massive, then he is black.
If someone is yellow, then he is not black, and vice versa.
Lauren being not open is equivalent to Norman being not yellow and Jarvis being not obedient. | Cedric is black. | neutral |
Bruce is obedient.
Jarvis is yellow.
Jarvis is not black.
Bruce is not handsome.
Norman is handsome.
Barclay is yellow.
Barclay is obedient.
Traci is not obedient.
Lauren is not black.
Barclay is black.
Traci is open.
Barclay is not massive.As long as someone is obedient, he is not massive and handsome.
If someone is not handsome, then he is obedient, and vice versa.
Someone who is obedient is always both not black and massive.
Someone being both obedient and not yellow is equivalent to being not black.
Someone who is not yellow and massive is always not open and handsome.
Someone being both handsome and not open is equivalent to being massive and yellow.
If there is someone who is either black or handsome, then Barclay is not massive.
If Traci is not yellow and Lauren is not massive, then Jarvis is not obedient.
If there is at least one people who is black, then Bruce is not handsome.
If someone is massive, then he is black.
If someone is yellow, then he is not black, and vice versa.
Lauren being not open is equivalent to Norman being not yellow and Jarvis being not obedient. | Bruce is open. | contradiction |
Bruce is obedient.
Jarvis is yellow.
Jarvis is not black.
Bruce is not handsome.
Norman is handsome.
Barclay is yellow.
Barclay is obedient.
Traci is not obedient.
Lauren is not black.
Barclay is black.
Traci is open.
Barclay is not massive.As long as someone is obedient, he is not massive and handsome.
If someone is not handsome, then he is obedient, and vice versa.
Someone who is obedient is always both not black and massive.
Someone being both obedient and not yellow is equivalent to being not black.
Someone who is not yellow and massive is always not open and handsome.
Someone being both handsome and not open is equivalent to being massive and yellow.
If there is someone who is either black or handsome, then Barclay is not massive.
If Traci is not yellow and Lauren is not massive, then Jarvis is not obedient.
If there is at least one people who is black, then Bruce is not handsome.
If someone is massive, then he is black.
If someone is yellow, then he is not black, and vice versa.
Lauren being not open is equivalent to Norman being not yellow and Jarvis being not obedient. | Traci is not massive. | neutral |
Bruce is obedient.
Jarvis is yellow.
Jarvis is not black.
Bruce is not handsome.
Norman is handsome.
Barclay is yellow.
Barclay is obedient.
Traci is not obedient.
Lauren is not black.
Barclay is black.
Traci is open.
Barclay is not massive.As long as someone is obedient, he is not massive and handsome.
If someone is not handsome, then he is obedient, and vice versa.
Someone who is obedient is always both not black and massive.
Someone being both obedient and not yellow is equivalent to being not black.
Someone who is not yellow and massive is always not open and handsome.
Someone being both handsome and not open is equivalent to being massive and yellow.
If there is someone who is either black or handsome, then Barclay is not massive.
If Traci is not yellow and Lauren is not massive, then Jarvis is not obedient.
If there is at least one people who is black, then Bruce is not handsome.
If someone is massive, then he is black.
If someone is yellow, then he is not black, and vice versa.
Lauren being not open is equivalent to Norman being not yellow and Jarvis being not obedient. | Jarvis is yellow. | self_contradiction |
Bruce is obedient.
Jarvis is yellow.
Jarvis is not black.
Bruce is not handsome.
Norman is handsome.
Barclay is yellow.
Barclay is obedient.
Traci is not obedient.
Lauren is not black.
Barclay is black.
Traci is open.
Barclay is not massive.As long as someone is obedient, he is not massive and handsome.
If someone is not handsome, then he is obedient, and vice versa.
Someone who is obedient is always both not black and massive.
Someone being both obedient and not yellow is equivalent to being not black.
Someone who is not yellow and massive is always not open and handsome.
Someone being both handsome and not open is equivalent to being massive and yellow.
If there is someone who is either black or handsome, then Barclay is not massive.
If Traci is not yellow and Lauren is not massive, then Jarvis is not obedient.
If there is at least one people who is black, then Bruce is not handsome.
If someone is massive, then he is black.
If someone is yellow, then he is not black, and vice versa.
Lauren being not open is equivalent to Norman being not yellow and Jarvis being not obedient. | Barclay is open. | contradiction |
Bruce is obedient.
Jarvis is yellow.
Jarvis is not black.
Bruce is not handsome.
Norman is handsome.
Barclay is yellow.
Barclay is obedient.
Traci is not obedient.
Lauren is not black.
Barclay is black.
Traci is open.
Barclay is not massive.As long as someone is obedient, he is not massive and handsome.
If someone is not handsome, then he is obedient, and vice versa.
Someone who is obedient is always both not black and massive.
Someone being both obedient and not yellow is equivalent to being not black.
Someone who is not yellow and massive is always not open and handsome.
Someone being both handsome and not open is equivalent to being massive and yellow.
If there is someone who is either black or handsome, then Barclay is not massive.
If Traci is not yellow and Lauren is not massive, then Jarvis is not obedient.
If there is at least one people who is black, then Bruce is not handsome.
If someone is massive, then he is black.
If someone is yellow, then he is not black, and vice versa.
Lauren being not open is equivalent to Norman being not yellow and Jarvis being not obedient. | Bruce is not black. | self_contradiction |
Bruce is obedient.
Jarvis is yellow.
Jarvis is not black.
Bruce is not handsome.
Norman is handsome.
Barclay is yellow.
Barclay is obedient.
Traci is not obedient.
Lauren is not black.
Barclay is black.
Traci is open.
Barclay is not massive.As long as someone is obedient, he is not massive and handsome.
If someone is not handsome, then he is obedient, and vice versa.
Someone who is obedient is always both not black and massive.
Someone being both obedient and not yellow is equivalent to being not black.
Someone who is not yellow and massive is always not open and handsome.
Someone being both handsome and not open is equivalent to being massive and yellow.
If there is someone who is either black or handsome, then Barclay is not massive.
If Traci is not yellow and Lauren is not massive, then Jarvis is not obedient.
If there is at least one people who is black, then Bruce is not handsome.
If someone is massive, then he is black.
If someone is yellow, then he is not black, and vice versa.
Lauren being not open is equivalent to Norman being not yellow and Jarvis being not obedient. | Cedric is obedient. | neutral |
Bruce is obedient.
Jarvis is yellow.
Jarvis is not black.
Bruce is not handsome.
Norman is handsome.
Barclay is yellow.
Barclay is obedient.
Traci is not obedient.
Lauren is not black.
Barclay is black.
Traci is open.
Barclay is not massive.As long as someone is obedient, he is not massive and handsome.
If someone is not handsome, then he is obedient, and vice versa.
Someone who is obedient is always both not black and massive.
Someone being both obedient and not yellow is equivalent to being not black.
Someone who is not yellow and massive is always not open and handsome.
Someone being both handsome and not open is equivalent to being massive and yellow.
If there is someone who is either black or handsome, then Barclay is not massive.
If Traci is not yellow and Lauren is not massive, then Jarvis is not obedient.
If there is at least one people who is black, then Bruce is not handsome.
If someone is massive, then he is black.
If someone is yellow, then he is not black, and vice versa.
Lauren being not open is equivalent to Norman being not yellow and Jarvis being not obedient. | Barclay is not obedient. | contradiction |
Bruce is obedient.
Jarvis is yellow.
Jarvis is not black.
Bruce is not handsome.
Norman is handsome.
Barclay is yellow.
Barclay is obedient.
Traci is not obedient.
Lauren is not black.
Barclay is black.
Traci is open.
Barclay is not massive.As long as someone is obedient, he is not massive and handsome.
If someone is not handsome, then he is obedient, and vice versa.
Someone who is obedient is always both not black and massive.
Someone being both obedient and not yellow is equivalent to being not black.
Someone who is not yellow and massive is always not open and handsome.
Someone being both handsome and not open is equivalent to being massive and yellow.
If there is someone who is either black or handsome, then Barclay is not massive.
If Traci is not yellow and Lauren is not massive, then Jarvis is not obedient.
If there is at least one people who is black, then Bruce is not handsome.
If someone is massive, then he is black.
If someone is yellow, then he is not black, and vice versa.
Lauren being not open is equivalent to Norman being not yellow and Jarvis being not obedient. | Cedric is not massive. | neutral |
Bruce is obedient.
Jarvis is yellow.
Jarvis is not black.
Bruce is not handsome.
Norman is handsome.
Barclay is yellow.
Barclay is obedient.
Traci is not obedient.
Lauren is not black.
Barclay is black.
Traci is open.
Barclay is not massive.As long as someone is obedient, he is not massive and handsome.
If someone is not handsome, then he is obedient, and vice versa.
Someone who is obedient is always both not black and massive.
Someone being both obedient and not yellow is equivalent to being not black.
Someone who is not yellow and massive is always not open and handsome.
Someone being both handsome and not open is equivalent to being massive and yellow.
If there is someone who is either black or handsome, then Barclay is not massive.
If Traci is not yellow and Lauren is not massive, then Jarvis is not obedient.
If there is at least one people who is black, then Bruce is not handsome.
If someone is massive, then he is black.
If someone is yellow, then he is not black, and vice versa.
Lauren being not open is equivalent to Norman being not yellow and Jarvis being not obedient. | Norman is yellow. | contradiction |
Bruce is obedient.
Jarvis is yellow.
Jarvis is not black.
Bruce is not handsome.
Norman is handsome.
Barclay is yellow.
Barclay is obedient.
Traci is not obedient.
Lauren is not black.
Barclay is black.
Traci is open.
Barclay is not massive.As long as someone is obedient, he is not massive and handsome.
If someone is not handsome, then he is obedient, and vice versa.
Someone who is obedient is always both not black and massive.
Someone being both obedient and not yellow is equivalent to being not black.
Someone who is not yellow and massive is always not open and handsome.
Someone being both handsome and not open is equivalent to being massive and yellow.
If there is someone who is either black or handsome, then Barclay is not massive.
If Traci is not yellow and Lauren is not massive, then Jarvis is not obedient.
If there is at least one people who is black, then Bruce is not handsome.
If someone is massive, then he is black.
If someone is yellow, then he is not black, and vice versa.
Lauren being not open is equivalent to Norman being not yellow and Jarvis being not obedient. | Bruce is obedient. | entailment |
Bruce is obedient.
Jarvis is yellow.
Jarvis is not black.
Bruce is not handsome.
Norman is handsome.
Barclay is yellow.
Barclay is obedient.
Traci is not obedient.
Lauren is not black.
Barclay is black.
Traci is open.
Barclay is not massive.As long as someone is obedient, he is not massive and handsome.
If someone is not handsome, then he is obedient, and vice versa.
Someone who is obedient is always both not black and massive.
Someone being both obedient and not yellow is equivalent to being not black.
Someone who is not yellow and massive is always not open and handsome.
Someone being both handsome and not open is equivalent to being massive and yellow.
If there is someone who is either black or handsome, then Barclay is not massive.
If Traci is not yellow and Lauren is not massive, then Jarvis is not obedient.
If there is at least one people who is black, then Bruce is not handsome.
If someone is massive, then he is black.
If someone is yellow, then he is not black, and vice versa.
Lauren being not open is equivalent to Norman being not yellow and Jarvis being not obedient. | Norman is handsome. | entailment |
Bruce is obedient.
Jarvis is yellow.
Jarvis is not black.
Bruce is not handsome.
Norman is handsome.
Barclay is yellow.
Barclay is obedient.
Traci is not obedient.
Lauren is not black.
Barclay is black.
Traci is open.
Barclay is not massive.As long as someone is obedient, he is not massive and handsome.
If someone is not handsome, then he is obedient, and vice versa.
Someone who is obedient is always both not black and massive.
Someone being both obedient and not yellow is equivalent to being not black.
Someone who is not yellow and massive is always not open and handsome.
Someone being both handsome and not open is equivalent to being massive and yellow.
If there is someone who is either black or handsome, then Barclay is not massive.
If Traci is not yellow and Lauren is not massive, then Jarvis is not obedient.
If there is at least one people who is black, then Bruce is not handsome.
If someone is massive, then he is black.
If someone is yellow, then he is not black, and vice versa.
Lauren being not open is equivalent to Norman being not yellow and Jarvis being not obedient. | Jarvis is not handsome. | self_contradiction |
Bruce is obedient.
Jarvis is yellow.
Jarvis is not black.
Bruce is not handsome.
Norman is handsome.
Barclay is yellow.
Barclay is obedient.
Traci is not obedient.
Lauren is not black.
Barclay is black.
Traci is open.
Barclay is not massive.As long as someone is obedient, he is not massive and handsome.
If someone is not handsome, then he is obedient, and vice versa.
Someone who is obedient is always both not black and massive.
Someone being both obedient and not yellow is equivalent to being not black.
Someone who is not yellow and massive is always not open and handsome.
Someone being both handsome and not open is equivalent to being massive and yellow.
If there is someone who is either black or handsome, then Barclay is not massive.
If Traci is not yellow and Lauren is not massive, then Jarvis is not obedient.
If there is at least one people who is black, then Bruce is not handsome.
If someone is massive, then he is black.
If someone is yellow, then he is not black, and vice versa.
Lauren being not open is equivalent to Norman being not yellow and Jarvis being not obedient. | Cedric is not yellow. | neutral |
Bruce is obedient.
Jarvis is yellow.
Jarvis is not black.
Bruce is not handsome.
Norman is handsome.
Barclay is yellow.
Barclay is obedient.
Traci is not obedient.
Lauren is not black.
Barclay is black.
Traci is open.
Barclay is not massive.As long as someone is obedient, he is not massive and handsome.
If someone is not handsome, then he is obedient, and vice versa.
Someone who is obedient is always both not black and massive.
Someone being both obedient and not yellow is equivalent to being not black.
Someone who is not yellow and massive is always not open and handsome.
Someone being both handsome and not open is equivalent to being massive and yellow.
If there is someone who is either black or handsome, then Barclay is not massive.
If Traci is not yellow and Lauren is not massive, then Jarvis is not obedient.
If there is at least one people who is black, then Bruce is not handsome.
If someone is massive, then he is black.
If someone is yellow, then he is not black, and vice versa.
Lauren being not open is equivalent to Norman being not yellow and Jarvis being not obedient. | Jarvis is not open. | entailment |
Valentina is not adorable.
Vicki is not adorable.
Royce is not romantic.
Tracey is not powerful.
Royce is remarkable.
Sherman is not remarkable.
Tobias is sexual.
Royce is not sexual.
Vicki is adventurous.
Tracey is not adorable.
Sherman is not powerful.
Valentina is romantic.Someone who is not sexual is always not powerful.
If someone is powerful, then he is not sexual, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either sexual or romantic, he is not adventurous and powerful.
If there is someone who is not adorable, then Sherman is powerful and Royce is adventurous.
Someone is not sexual if and only if he is not remarkable.
If there is someone who is both not remarkable and not sexual, then Tobias is adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is both not adorable and remarkable, then Sherman is not sexual.
If someone is not remarkable, then he is not sexual, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Sherman is powerful once knowing that Tracey is not sexual.
If everyone is sexual, then Vicki is not adorable.
If Royce is not remarkable and Sherman is adorable, then Royce is not sexual.
Della being not adorable and Vicki being not adventurous imply that Tobias is not remarkable. | Tobias is not adventurous. | self_contradiction |
Valentina is not adorable.
Vicki is not adorable.
Royce is not romantic.
Tracey is not powerful.
Royce is remarkable.
Sherman is not remarkable.
Tobias is sexual.
Royce is not sexual.
Vicki is adventurous.
Tracey is not adorable.
Sherman is not powerful.
Valentina is romantic.Someone who is not sexual is always not powerful.
If someone is powerful, then he is not sexual, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either sexual or romantic, he is not adventurous and powerful.
If there is someone who is not adorable, then Sherman is powerful and Royce is adventurous.
Someone is not sexual if and only if he is not remarkable.
If there is someone who is both not remarkable and not sexual, then Tobias is adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is both not adorable and remarkable, then Sherman is not sexual.
If someone is not remarkable, then he is not sexual, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Sherman is powerful once knowing that Tracey is not sexual.
If everyone is sexual, then Vicki is not adorable.
If Royce is not remarkable and Sherman is adorable, then Royce is not sexual.
Della being not adorable and Vicki being not adventurous imply that Tobias is not remarkable. | Royce is not adventurous. | contradiction |
Valentina is not adorable.
Vicki is not adorable.
Royce is not romantic.
Tracey is not powerful.
Royce is remarkable.
Sherman is not remarkable.
Tobias is sexual.
Royce is not sexual.
Vicki is adventurous.
Tracey is not adorable.
Sherman is not powerful.
Valentina is romantic.Someone who is not sexual is always not powerful.
If someone is powerful, then he is not sexual, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either sexual or romantic, he is not adventurous and powerful.
If there is someone who is not adorable, then Sherman is powerful and Royce is adventurous.
Someone is not sexual if and only if he is not remarkable.
If there is someone who is both not remarkable and not sexual, then Tobias is adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is both not adorable and remarkable, then Sherman is not sexual.
If someone is not remarkable, then he is not sexual, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Sherman is powerful once knowing that Tracey is not sexual.
If everyone is sexual, then Vicki is not adorable.
If Royce is not remarkable and Sherman is adorable, then Royce is not sexual.
Della being not adorable and Vicki being not adventurous imply that Tobias is not remarkable. | Sherman is not sexual. | entailment |
Valentina is not adorable.
Vicki is not adorable.
Royce is not romantic.
Tracey is not powerful.
Royce is remarkable.
Sherman is not remarkable.
Tobias is sexual.
Royce is not sexual.
Vicki is adventurous.
Tracey is not adorable.
Sherman is not powerful.
Valentina is romantic.Someone who is not sexual is always not powerful.
If someone is powerful, then he is not sexual, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either sexual or romantic, he is not adventurous and powerful.
If there is someone who is not adorable, then Sherman is powerful and Royce is adventurous.
Someone is not sexual if and only if he is not remarkable.
If there is someone who is both not remarkable and not sexual, then Tobias is adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is both not adorable and remarkable, then Sherman is not sexual.
If someone is not remarkable, then he is not sexual, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Sherman is powerful once knowing that Tracey is not sexual.
If everyone is sexual, then Vicki is not adorable.
If Royce is not remarkable and Sherman is adorable, then Royce is not sexual.
Della being not adorable and Vicki being not adventurous imply that Tobias is not remarkable. | Royce is not remarkable. | self_contradiction |
Valentina is not adorable.
Vicki is not adorable.
Royce is not romantic.
Tracey is not powerful.
Royce is remarkable.
Sherman is not remarkable.
Tobias is sexual.
Royce is not sexual.
Vicki is adventurous.
Tracey is not adorable.
Sherman is not powerful.
Valentina is romantic.Someone who is not sexual is always not powerful.
If someone is powerful, then he is not sexual, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either sexual or romantic, he is not adventurous and powerful.
If there is someone who is not adorable, then Sherman is powerful and Royce is adventurous.
Someone is not sexual if and only if he is not remarkable.
If there is someone who is both not remarkable and not sexual, then Tobias is adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is both not adorable and remarkable, then Sherman is not sexual.
If someone is not remarkable, then he is not sexual, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Sherman is powerful once knowing that Tracey is not sexual.
If everyone is sexual, then Vicki is not adorable.
If Royce is not remarkable and Sherman is adorable, then Royce is not sexual.
Della being not adorable and Vicki being not adventurous imply that Tobias is not remarkable. | Royce is adventurous. | entailment |
Valentina is not adorable.
Vicki is not adorable.
Royce is not romantic.
Tracey is not powerful.
Royce is remarkable.
Sherman is not remarkable.
Tobias is sexual.
Royce is not sexual.
Vicki is adventurous.
Tracey is not adorable.
Sherman is not powerful.
Valentina is romantic.Someone who is not sexual is always not powerful.
If someone is powerful, then he is not sexual, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either sexual or romantic, he is not adventurous and powerful.
If there is someone who is not adorable, then Sherman is powerful and Royce is adventurous.
Someone is not sexual if and only if he is not remarkable.
If there is someone who is both not remarkable and not sexual, then Tobias is adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is both not adorable and remarkable, then Sherman is not sexual.
If someone is not remarkable, then he is not sexual, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Sherman is powerful once knowing that Tracey is not sexual.
If everyone is sexual, then Vicki is not adorable.
If Royce is not remarkable and Sherman is adorable, then Royce is not sexual.
Della being not adorable and Vicki being not adventurous imply that Tobias is not remarkable. | Royce is not adorable. | neutral |
Valentina is not adorable.
Vicki is not adorable.
Royce is not romantic.
Tracey is not powerful.
Royce is remarkable.
Sherman is not remarkable.
Tobias is sexual.
Royce is not sexual.
Vicki is adventurous.
Tracey is not adorable.
Sherman is not powerful.
Valentina is romantic.Someone who is not sexual is always not powerful.
If someone is powerful, then he is not sexual, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either sexual or romantic, he is not adventurous and powerful.
If there is someone who is not adorable, then Sherman is powerful and Royce is adventurous.
Someone is not sexual if and only if he is not remarkable.
If there is someone who is both not remarkable and not sexual, then Tobias is adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is both not adorable and remarkable, then Sherman is not sexual.
If someone is not remarkable, then he is not sexual, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Sherman is powerful once knowing that Tracey is not sexual.
If everyone is sexual, then Vicki is not adorable.
If Royce is not remarkable and Sherman is adorable, then Royce is not sexual.
Della being not adorable and Vicki being not adventurous imply that Tobias is not remarkable. | Tobias is not remarkable. | entailment |
Valentina is not adorable.
Vicki is not adorable.
Royce is not romantic.
Tracey is not powerful.
Royce is remarkable.
Sherman is not remarkable.
Tobias is sexual.
Royce is not sexual.
Vicki is adventurous.
Tracey is not adorable.
Sherman is not powerful.
Valentina is romantic.Someone who is not sexual is always not powerful.
If someone is powerful, then he is not sexual, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either sexual or romantic, he is not adventurous and powerful.
If there is someone who is not adorable, then Sherman is powerful and Royce is adventurous.
Someone is not sexual if and only if he is not remarkable.
If there is someone who is both not remarkable and not sexual, then Tobias is adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is both not adorable and remarkable, then Sherman is not sexual.
If someone is not remarkable, then he is not sexual, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Sherman is powerful once knowing that Tracey is not sexual.
If everyone is sexual, then Vicki is not adorable.
If Royce is not remarkable and Sherman is adorable, then Royce is not sexual.
Della being not adorable and Vicki being not adventurous imply that Tobias is not remarkable. | Sherman is sexual. | contradiction |
Valentina is not adorable.
Vicki is not adorable.
Royce is not romantic.
Tracey is not powerful.
Royce is remarkable.
Sherman is not remarkable.
Tobias is sexual.
Royce is not sexual.
Vicki is adventurous.
Tracey is not adorable.
Sherman is not powerful.
Valentina is romantic.Someone who is not sexual is always not powerful.
If someone is powerful, then he is not sexual, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either sexual or romantic, he is not adventurous and powerful.
If there is someone who is not adorable, then Sherman is powerful and Royce is adventurous.
Someone is not sexual if and only if he is not remarkable.
If there is someone who is both not remarkable and not sexual, then Tobias is adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is both not adorable and remarkable, then Sherman is not sexual.
If someone is not remarkable, then he is not sexual, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Sherman is powerful once knowing that Tracey is not sexual.
If everyone is sexual, then Vicki is not adorable.
If Royce is not remarkable and Sherman is adorable, then Royce is not sexual.
Della being not adorable and Vicki being not adventurous imply that Tobias is not remarkable. | Della is not romantic. | neutral |
Valentina is not adorable.
Vicki is not adorable.
Royce is not romantic.
Tracey is not powerful.
Royce is remarkable.
Sherman is not remarkable.
Tobias is sexual.
Royce is not sexual.
Vicki is adventurous.
Tracey is not adorable.
Sherman is not powerful.
Valentina is romantic.Someone who is not sexual is always not powerful.
If someone is powerful, then he is not sexual, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either sexual or romantic, he is not adventurous and powerful.
If there is someone who is not adorable, then Sherman is powerful and Royce is adventurous.
Someone is not sexual if and only if he is not remarkable.
If there is someone who is both not remarkable and not sexual, then Tobias is adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is both not adorable and remarkable, then Sherman is not sexual.
If someone is not remarkable, then he is not sexual, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Sherman is powerful once knowing that Tracey is not sexual.
If everyone is sexual, then Vicki is not adorable.
If Royce is not remarkable and Sherman is adorable, then Royce is not sexual.
Della being not adorable and Vicki being not adventurous imply that Tobias is not remarkable. | Royce is powerful. | self_contradiction |
Valentina is not adorable.
Vicki is not adorable.
Royce is not romantic.
Tracey is not powerful.
Royce is remarkable.
Sherman is not remarkable.
Tobias is sexual.
Royce is not sexual.
Vicki is adventurous.
Tracey is not adorable.
Sherman is not powerful.
Valentina is romantic.Someone who is not sexual is always not powerful.
If someone is powerful, then he is not sexual, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either sexual or romantic, he is not adventurous and powerful.
If there is someone who is not adorable, then Sherman is powerful and Royce is adventurous.
Someone is not sexual if and only if he is not remarkable.
If there is someone who is both not remarkable and not sexual, then Tobias is adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is both not adorable and remarkable, then Sherman is not sexual.
If someone is not remarkable, then he is not sexual, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Sherman is powerful once knowing that Tracey is not sexual.
If everyone is sexual, then Vicki is not adorable.
If Royce is not remarkable and Sherman is adorable, then Royce is not sexual.
Della being not adorable and Vicki being not adventurous imply that Tobias is not remarkable. | Royce is not sexual. | entailment |
Valentina is not adorable.
Vicki is not adorable.
Royce is not romantic.
Tracey is not powerful.
Royce is remarkable.
Sherman is not remarkable.
Tobias is sexual.
Royce is not sexual.
Vicki is adventurous.
Tracey is not adorable.
Sherman is not powerful.
Valentina is romantic.Someone who is not sexual is always not powerful.
If someone is powerful, then he is not sexual, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either sexual or romantic, he is not adventurous and powerful.
If there is someone who is not adorable, then Sherman is powerful and Royce is adventurous.
Someone is not sexual if and only if he is not remarkable.
If there is someone who is both not remarkable and not sexual, then Tobias is adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is both not adorable and remarkable, then Sherman is not sexual.
If someone is not remarkable, then he is not sexual, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Sherman is powerful once knowing that Tracey is not sexual.
If everyone is sexual, then Vicki is not adorable.
If Royce is not remarkable and Sherman is adorable, then Royce is not sexual.
Della being not adorable and Vicki being not adventurous imply that Tobias is not remarkable. | Valentina is adventurous. | contradiction |
Valentina is not adorable.
Vicki is not adorable.
Royce is not romantic.
Tracey is not powerful.
Royce is remarkable.
Sherman is not remarkable.
Tobias is sexual.
Royce is not sexual.
Vicki is adventurous.
Tracey is not adorable.
Sherman is not powerful.
Valentina is romantic.Someone who is not sexual is always not powerful.
If someone is powerful, then he is not sexual, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either sexual or romantic, he is not adventurous and powerful.
If there is someone who is not adorable, then Sherman is powerful and Royce is adventurous.
Someone is not sexual if and only if he is not remarkable.
If there is someone who is both not remarkable and not sexual, then Tobias is adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is both not adorable and remarkable, then Sherman is not sexual.
If someone is not remarkable, then he is not sexual, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Sherman is powerful once knowing that Tracey is not sexual.
If everyone is sexual, then Vicki is not adorable.
If Royce is not remarkable and Sherman is adorable, then Royce is not sexual.
Della being not adorable and Vicki being not adventurous imply that Tobias is not remarkable. | Tracey is adorable. | contradiction |
Valentina is not adorable.
Vicki is not adorable.
Royce is not romantic.
Tracey is not powerful.
Royce is remarkable.
Sherman is not remarkable.
Tobias is sexual.
Royce is not sexual.
Vicki is adventurous.
Tracey is not adorable.
Sherman is not powerful.
Valentina is romantic.Someone who is not sexual is always not powerful.
If someone is powerful, then he is not sexual, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either sexual or romantic, he is not adventurous and powerful.
If there is someone who is not adorable, then Sherman is powerful and Royce is adventurous.
Someone is not sexual if and only if he is not remarkable.
If there is someone who is both not remarkable and not sexual, then Tobias is adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is both not adorable and remarkable, then Sherman is not sexual.
If someone is not remarkable, then he is not sexual, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Sherman is powerful once knowing that Tracey is not sexual.
If everyone is sexual, then Vicki is not adorable.
If Royce is not remarkable and Sherman is adorable, then Royce is not sexual.
Della being not adorable and Vicki being not adventurous imply that Tobias is not remarkable. | Valentina is remarkable. | contradiction |
Valentina is not adorable.
Vicki is not adorable.
Royce is not romantic.
Tracey is not powerful.
Royce is remarkable.
Sherman is not remarkable.
Tobias is sexual.
Royce is not sexual.
Vicki is adventurous.
Tracey is not adorable.
Sherman is not powerful.
Valentina is romantic.Someone who is not sexual is always not powerful.
If someone is powerful, then he is not sexual, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either sexual or romantic, he is not adventurous and powerful.
If there is someone who is not adorable, then Sherman is powerful and Royce is adventurous.
Someone is not sexual if and only if he is not remarkable.
If there is someone who is both not remarkable and not sexual, then Tobias is adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is both not adorable and remarkable, then Sherman is not sexual.
If someone is not remarkable, then he is not sexual, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Sherman is powerful once knowing that Tracey is not sexual.
If everyone is sexual, then Vicki is not adorable.
If Royce is not remarkable and Sherman is adorable, then Royce is not sexual.
Della being not adorable and Vicki being not adventurous imply that Tobias is not remarkable. | Vicki is powerful. | neutral |
Valentina is not adorable.
Vicki is not adorable.
Royce is not romantic.
Tracey is not powerful.
Royce is remarkable.
Sherman is not remarkable.
Tobias is sexual.
Royce is not sexual.
Vicki is adventurous.
Tracey is not adorable.
Sherman is not powerful.
Valentina is romantic.Someone who is not sexual is always not powerful.
If someone is powerful, then he is not sexual, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either sexual or romantic, he is not adventurous and powerful.
If there is someone who is not adorable, then Sherman is powerful and Royce is adventurous.
Someone is not sexual if and only if he is not remarkable.
If there is someone who is both not remarkable and not sexual, then Tobias is adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is both not adorable and remarkable, then Sherman is not sexual.
If someone is not remarkable, then he is not sexual, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Sherman is powerful once knowing that Tracey is not sexual.
If everyone is sexual, then Vicki is not adorable.
If Royce is not remarkable and Sherman is adorable, then Royce is not sexual.
Della being not adorable and Vicki being not adventurous imply that Tobias is not remarkable. | Royce is not powerful. | self_contradiction |
Valentina is not adorable.
Vicki is not adorable.
Royce is not romantic.
Tracey is not powerful.
Royce is remarkable.
Sherman is not remarkable.
Tobias is sexual.
Royce is not sexual.
Vicki is adventurous.
Tracey is not adorable.
Sherman is not powerful.
Valentina is romantic.Someone who is not sexual is always not powerful.
If someone is powerful, then he is not sexual, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either sexual or romantic, he is not adventurous and powerful.
If there is someone who is not adorable, then Sherman is powerful and Royce is adventurous.
Someone is not sexual if and only if he is not remarkable.
If there is someone who is both not remarkable and not sexual, then Tobias is adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is both not adorable and remarkable, then Sherman is not sexual.
If someone is not remarkable, then he is not sexual, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Sherman is powerful once knowing that Tracey is not sexual.
If everyone is sexual, then Vicki is not adorable.
If Royce is not remarkable and Sherman is adorable, then Royce is not sexual.
Della being not adorable and Vicki being not adventurous imply that Tobias is not remarkable. | Valentina is not adventurous. | entailment |
Valentina is not adorable.
Vicki is not adorable.
Royce is not romantic.
Tracey is not powerful.
Royce is remarkable.
Sherman is not remarkable.
Tobias is sexual.
Royce is not sexual.
Vicki is adventurous.
Tracey is not adorable.
Sherman is not powerful.
Valentina is romantic.Someone who is not sexual is always not powerful.
If someone is powerful, then he is not sexual, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either sexual or romantic, he is not adventurous and powerful.
If there is someone who is not adorable, then Sherman is powerful and Royce is adventurous.
Someone is not sexual if and only if he is not remarkable.
If there is someone who is both not remarkable and not sexual, then Tobias is adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is both not adorable and remarkable, then Sherman is not sexual.
If someone is not remarkable, then he is not sexual, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Sherman is powerful once knowing that Tracey is not sexual.
If everyone is sexual, then Vicki is not adorable.
If Royce is not remarkable and Sherman is adorable, then Royce is not sexual.
Della being not adorable and Vicki being not adventurous imply that Tobias is not remarkable. | Vicki is not romantic. | neutral |
Valentina is not adorable.
Vicki is not adorable.
Royce is not romantic.
Tracey is not powerful.
Royce is remarkable.
Sherman is not remarkable.
Tobias is sexual.
Royce is not sexual.
Vicki is adventurous.
Tracey is not adorable.
Sherman is not powerful.
Valentina is romantic.Someone who is not sexual is always not powerful.
If someone is powerful, then he is not sexual, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either sexual or romantic, he is not adventurous and powerful.
If there is someone who is not adorable, then Sherman is powerful and Royce is adventurous.
Someone is not sexual if and only if he is not remarkable.
If there is someone who is both not remarkable and not sexual, then Tobias is adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is both not adorable and remarkable, then Sherman is not sexual.
If someone is not remarkable, then he is not sexual, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Sherman is powerful once knowing that Tracey is not sexual.
If everyone is sexual, then Vicki is not adorable.
If Royce is not remarkable and Sherman is adorable, then Royce is not sexual.
Della being not adorable and Vicki being not adventurous imply that Tobias is not remarkable. | Vicki is romantic. | neutral |
Valentina is not adorable.
Vicki is not adorable.
Royce is not romantic.
Tracey is not powerful.
Royce is remarkable.
Sherman is not remarkable.
Tobias is sexual.
Royce is not sexual.
Vicki is adventurous.
Tracey is not adorable.
Sherman is not powerful.
Valentina is romantic.Someone who is not sexual is always not powerful.
If someone is powerful, then he is not sexual, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either sexual or romantic, he is not adventurous and powerful.
If there is someone who is not adorable, then Sherman is powerful and Royce is adventurous.
Someone is not sexual if and only if he is not remarkable.
If there is someone who is both not remarkable and not sexual, then Tobias is adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is both not adorable and remarkable, then Sherman is not sexual.
If someone is not remarkable, then he is not sexual, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Sherman is powerful once knowing that Tracey is not sexual.
If everyone is sexual, then Vicki is not adorable.
If Royce is not remarkable and Sherman is adorable, then Royce is not sexual.
Della being not adorable and Vicki being not adventurous imply that Tobias is not remarkable. | Tobias is powerful. | self_contradiction |
Caldwell is few.
Baldwin is elegant.
Laurence is not informal.
Hubert is not elegant.
Hubert is not polite.
Hunter is not inquisitive.
Laurence is elegant.
Caldwell is informal.
Bud is not wrong.
Hubert is not few.
Laurence is polite.
Baldwin is not inquisitive.If there is someone who is either not wrong or few, then Hubert is not polite.
If there is at least one people who is both polite and not informal, then Caldwell is few.
If there is at least one people who is not few, then Hubert is informal and Hubert is not inquisitive.
If there is someone who is not inquisitive, then Hunter is wrong.
Hunter is elegant if and only if Laurence is not polite.
Baldwin being elegant implies that Bud is not inquisitive.
Someone being both not wrong and not polite is equivalent to being inquisitive.
All few people are inquisitive.
If there is someone who is both wrong and few, then Baldwin is not inquisitive and Anabelle is informal.
If someone is either polite or not wrong, then he is not inquisitive and elegant.
Baldwin being not inquisitive implies that Hubert is not few and Hunter is not elegant.
If someone is both informal and not polite, then he is not wrong. | Hubert is elegant. | self_contradiction |
Caldwell is few.
Baldwin is elegant.
Laurence is not informal.
Hubert is not elegant.
Hubert is not polite.
Hunter is not inquisitive.
Laurence is elegant.
Caldwell is informal.
Bud is not wrong.
Hubert is not few.
Laurence is polite.
Baldwin is not inquisitive.If there is someone who is either not wrong or few, then Hubert is not polite.
If there is at least one people who is both polite and not informal, then Caldwell is few.
If there is at least one people who is not few, then Hubert is informal and Hubert is not inquisitive.
If there is someone who is not inquisitive, then Hunter is wrong.
Hunter is elegant if and only if Laurence is not polite.
Baldwin being elegant implies that Bud is not inquisitive.
Someone being both not wrong and not polite is equivalent to being inquisitive.
All few people are inquisitive.
If there is someone who is both wrong and few, then Baldwin is not inquisitive and Anabelle is informal.
If someone is either polite or not wrong, then he is not inquisitive and elegant.
Baldwin being not inquisitive implies that Hubert is not few and Hunter is not elegant.
If someone is both informal and not polite, then he is not wrong. | Hubert is not polite. | entailment |
Caldwell is few.
Baldwin is elegant.
Laurence is not informal.
Hubert is not elegant.
Hubert is not polite.
Hunter is not inquisitive.
Laurence is elegant.
Caldwell is informal.
Bud is not wrong.
Hubert is not few.
Laurence is polite.
Baldwin is not inquisitive.If there is someone who is either not wrong or few, then Hubert is not polite.
If there is at least one people who is both polite and not informal, then Caldwell is few.
If there is at least one people who is not few, then Hubert is informal and Hubert is not inquisitive.
If there is someone who is not inquisitive, then Hunter is wrong.
Hunter is elegant if and only if Laurence is not polite.
Baldwin being elegant implies that Bud is not inquisitive.
Someone being both not wrong and not polite is equivalent to being inquisitive.
All few people are inquisitive.
If there is someone who is both wrong and few, then Baldwin is not inquisitive and Anabelle is informal.
If someone is either polite or not wrong, then he is not inquisitive and elegant.
Baldwin being not inquisitive implies that Hubert is not few and Hunter is not elegant.
If someone is both informal and not polite, then he is not wrong. | Hunter is informal. | neutral |
Caldwell is few.
Baldwin is elegant.
Laurence is not informal.
Hubert is not elegant.
Hubert is not polite.
Hunter is not inquisitive.
Laurence is elegant.
Caldwell is informal.
Bud is not wrong.
Hubert is not few.
Laurence is polite.
Baldwin is not inquisitive.If there is someone who is either not wrong or few, then Hubert is not polite.
If there is at least one people who is both polite and not informal, then Caldwell is few.
If there is at least one people who is not few, then Hubert is informal and Hubert is not inquisitive.
If there is someone who is not inquisitive, then Hunter is wrong.
Hunter is elegant if and only if Laurence is not polite.
Baldwin being elegant implies that Bud is not inquisitive.
Someone being both not wrong and not polite is equivalent to being inquisitive.
All few people are inquisitive.
If there is someone who is both wrong and few, then Baldwin is not inquisitive and Anabelle is informal.
If someone is either polite or not wrong, then he is not inquisitive and elegant.
Baldwin being not inquisitive implies that Hubert is not few and Hunter is not elegant.
If someone is both informal and not polite, then he is not wrong. | Hubert is informal. | entailment |
Caldwell is few.
Baldwin is elegant.
Laurence is not informal.
Hubert is not elegant.
Hubert is not polite.
Hunter is not inquisitive.
Laurence is elegant.
Caldwell is informal.
Bud is not wrong.
Hubert is not few.
Laurence is polite.
Baldwin is not inquisitive.If there is someone who is either not wrong or few, then Hubert is not polite.
If there is at least one people who is both polite and not informal, then Caldwell is few.
If there is at least one people who is not few, then Hubert is informal and Hubert is not inquisitive.
If there is someone who is not inquisitive, then Hunter is wrong.
Hunter is elegant if and only if Laurence is not polite.
Baldwin being elegant implies that Bud is not inquisitive.
Someone being both not wrong and not polite is equivalent to being inquisitive.
All few people are inquisitive.
If there is someone who is both wrong and few, then Baldwin is not inquisitive and Anabelle is informal.
If someone is either polite or not wrong, then he is not inquisitive and elegant.
Baldwin being not inquisitive implies that Hubert is not few and Hunter is not elegant.
If someone is both informal and not polite, then he is not wrong. | Laurence is elegant. | entailment |
Caldwell is few.
Baldwin is elegant.
Laurence is not informal.
Hubert is not elegant.
Hubert is not polite.
Hunter is not inquisitive.
Laurence is elegant.
Caldwell is informal.
Bud is not wrong.
Hubert is not few.
Laurence is polite.
Baldwin is not inquisitive.If there is someone who is either not wrong or few, then Hubert is not polite.
If there is at least one people who is both polite and not informal, then Caldwell is few.
If there is at least one people who is not few, then Hubert is informal and Hubert is not inquisitive.
If there is someone who is not inquisitive, then Hunter is wrong.
Hunter is elegant if and only if Laurence is not polite.
Baldwin being elegant implies that Bud is not inquisitive.
Someone being both not wrong and not polite is equivalent to being inquisitive.
All few people are inquisitive.
If there is someone who is both wrong and few, then Baldwin is not inquisitive and Anabelle is informal.
If someone is either polite or not wrong, then he is not inquisitive and elegant.
Baldwin being not inquisitive implies that Hubert is not few and Hunter is not elegant.
If someone is both informal and not polite, then he is not wrong. | Caldwell is not informal. | contradiction |
Caldwell is few.
Baldwin is elegant.
Laurence is not informal.
Hubert is not elegant.
Hubert is not polite.
Hunter is not inquisitive.
Laurence is elegant.
Caldwell is informal.
Bud is not wrong.
Hubert is not few.
Laurence is polite.
Baldwin is not inquisitive.If there is someone who is either not wrong or few, then Hubert is not polite.
If there is at least one people who is both polite and not informal, then Caldwell is few.
If there is at least one people who is not few, then Hubert is informal and Hubert is not inquisitive.
If there is someone who is not inquisitive, then Hunter is wrong.
Hunter is elegant if and only if Laurence is not polite.
Baldwin being elegant implies that Bud is not inquisitive.
Someone being both not wrong and not polite is equivalent to being inquisitive.
All few people are inquisitive.
If there is someone who is both wrong and few, then Baldwin is not inquisitive and Anabelle is informal.
If someone is either polite or not wrong, then he is not inquisitive and elegant.
Baldwin being not inquisitive implies that Hubert is not few and Hunter is not elegant.
If someone is both informal and not polite, then he is not wrong. | Caldwell is polite. | contradiction |
Caldwell is few.
Baldwin is elegant.
Laurence is not informal.
Hubert is not elegant.
Hubert is not polite.
Hunter is not inquisitive.
Laurence is elegant.
Caldwell is informal.
Bud is not wrong.
Hubert is not few.
Laurence is polite.
Baldwin is not inquisitive.If there is someone who is either not wrong or few, then Hubert is not polite.
If there is at least one people who is both polite and not informal, then Caldwell is few.
If there is at least one people who is not few, then Hubert is informal and Hubert is not inquisitive.
If there is someone who is not inquisitive, then Hunter is wrong.
Hunter is elegant if and only if Laurence is not polite.
Baldwin being elegant implies that Bud is not inquisitive.
Someone being both not wrong and not polite is equivalent to being inquisitive.
All few people are inquisitive.
If there is someone who is both wrong and few, then Baldwin is not inquisitive and Anabelle is informal.
If someone is either polite or not wrong, then he is not inquisitive and elegant.
Baldwin being not inquisitive implies that Hubert is not few and Hunter is not elegant.
If someone is both informal and not polite, then he is not wrong. | Baldwin is not few. | neutral |
Caldwell is few.
Baldwin is elegant.
Laurence is not informal.
Hubert is not elegant.
Hubert is not polite.
Hunter is not inquisitive.
Laurence is elegant.
Caldwell is informal.
Bud is not wrong.
Hubert is not few.
Laurence is polite.
Baldwin is not inquisitive.If there is someone who is either not wrong or few, then Hubert is not polite.
If there is at least one people who is both polite and not informal, then Caldwell is few.
If there is at least one people who is not few, then Hubert is informal and Hubert is not inquisitive.
If there is someone who is not inquisitive, then Hunter is wrong.
Hunter is elegant if and only if Laurence is not polite.
Baldwin being elegant implies that Bud is not inquisitive.
Someone being both not wrong and not polite is equivalent to being inquisitive.
All few people are inquisitive.
If there is someone who is both wrong and few, then Baldwin is not inquisitive and Anabelle is informal.
If someone is either polite or not wrong, then he is not inquisitive and elegant.
Baldwin being not inquisitive implies that Hubert is not few and Hunter is not elegant.
If someone is both informal and not polite, then he is not wrong. | Anabelle is not wrong. | neutral |
Caldwell is few.
Baldwin is elegant.
Laurence is not informal.
Hubert is not elegant.
Hubert is not polite.
Hunter is not inquisitive.
Laurence is elegant.
Caldwell is informal.
Bud is not wrong.
Hubert is not few.
Laurence is polite.
Baldwin is not inquisitive.If there is someone who is either not wrong or few, then Hubert is not polite.
If there is at least one people who is both polite and not informal, then Caldwell is few.
If there is at least one people who is not few, then Hubert is informal and Hubert is not inquisitive.
If there is someone who is not inquisitive, then Hunter is wrong.
Hunter is elegant if and only if Laurence is not polite.
Baldwin being elegant implies that Bud is not inquisitive.
Someone being both not wrong and not polite is equivalent to being inquisitive.
All few people are inquisitive.
If there is someone who is both wrong and few, then Baldwin is not inquisitive and Anabelle is informal.
If someone is either polite or not wrong, then he is not inquisitive and elegant.
Baldwin being not inquisitive implies that Hubert is not few and Hunter is not elegant.
If someone is both informal and not polite, then he is not wrong. | Caldwell is not few. | contradiction |
Caldwell is few.
Baldwin is elegant.
Laurence is not informal.
Hubert is not elegant.
Hubert is not polite.
Hunter is not inquisitive.
Laurence is elegant.
Caldwell is informal.
Bud is not wrong.
Hubert is not few.
Laurence is polite.
Baldwin is not inquisitive.If there is someone who is either not wrong or few, then Hubert is not polite.
If there is at least one people who is both polite and not informal, then Caldwell is few.
If there is at least one people who is not few, then Hubert is informal and Hubert is not inquisitive.
If there is someone who is not inquisitive, then Hunter is wrong.
Hunter is elegant if and only if Laurence is not polite.
Baldwin being elegant implies that Bud is not inquisitive.
Someone being both not wrong and not polite is equivalent to being inquisitive.
All few people are inquisitive.
If there is someone who is both wrong and few, then Baldwin is not inquisitive and Anabelle is informal.
If someone is either polite or not wrong, then he is not inquisitive and elegant.
Baldwin being not inquisitive implies that Hubert is not few and Hunter is not elegant.
If someone is both informal and not polite, then he is not wrong. | Hunter is not informal. | neutral |
Caldwell is few.
Baldwin is elegant.
Laurence is not informal.
Hubert is not elegant.
Hubert is not polite.
Hunter is not inquisitive.
Laurence is elegant.
Caldwell is informal.
Bud is not wrong.
Hubert is not few.
Laurence is polite.
Baldwin is not inquisitive.If there is someone who is either not wrong or few, then Hubert is not polite.
If there is at least one people who is both polite and not informal, then Caldwell is few.
If there is at least one people who is not few, then Hubert is informal and Hubert is not inquisitive.
If there is someone who is not inquisitive, then Hunter is wrong.
Hunter is elegant if and only if Laurence is not polite.
Baldwin being elegant implies that Bud is not inquisitive.
Someone being both not wrong and not polite is equivalent to being inquisitive.
All few people are inquisitive.
If there is someone who is both wrong and few, then Baldwin is not inquisitive and Anabelle is informal.
If someone is either polite or not wrong, then he is not inquisitive and elegant.
Baldwin being not inquisitive implies that Hubert is not few and Hunter is not elegant.
If someone is both informal and not polite, then he is not wrong. | Caldwell is inquisitive. | self_contradiction |
Caldwell is few.
Baldwin is elegant.
Laurence is not informal.
Hubert is not elegant.
Hubert is not polite.
Hunter is not inquisitive.
Laurence is elegant.
Caldwell is informal.
Bud is not wrong.
Hubert is not few.
Laurence is polite.
Baldwin is not inquisitive.If there is someone who is either not wrong or few, then Hubert is not polite.
If there is at least one people who is both polite and not informal, then Caldwell is few.
If there is at least one people who is not few, then Hubert is informal and Hubert is not inquisitive.
If there is someone who is not inquisitive, then Hunter is wrong.
Hunter is elegant if and only if Laurence is not polite.
Baldwin being elegant implies that Bud is not inquisitive.
Someone being both not wrong and not polite is equivalent to being inquisitive.
All few people are inquisitive.
If there is someone who is both wrong and few, then Baldwin is not inquisitive and Anabelle is informal.
If someone is either polite or not wrong, then he is not inquisitive and elegant.
Baldwin being not inquisitive implies that Hubert is not few and Hunter is not elegant.
If someone is both informal and not polite, then he is not wrong. | Hunter is inquisitive. | contradiction |
Caldwell is few.
Baldwin is elegant.
Laurence is not informal.
Hubert is not elegant.
Hubert is not polite.
Hunter is not inquisitive.
Laurence is elegant.
Caldwell is informal.
Bud is not wrong.
Hubert is not few.
Laurence is polite.
Baldwin is not inquisitive.If there is someone who is either not wrong or few, then Hubert is not polite.
If there is at least one people who is both polite and not informal, then Caldwell is few.
If there is at least one people who is not few, then Hubert is informal and Hubert is not inquisitive.
If there is someone who is not inquisitive, then Hunter is wrong.
Hunter is elegant if and only if Laurence is not polite.
Baldwin being elegant implies that Bud is not inquisitive.
Someone being both not wrong and not polite is equivalent to being inquisitive.
All few people are inquisitive.
If there is someone who is both wrong and few, then Baldwin is not inquisitive and Anabelle is informal.
If someone is either polite or not wrong, then he is not inquisitive and elegant.
Baldwin being not inquisitive implies that Hubert is not few and Hunter is not elegant.
If someone is both informal and not polite, then he is not wrong. | Caldwell is not inquisitive. | self_contradiction |
Caldwell is few.
Baldwin is elegant.
Laurence is not informal.
Hubert is not elegant.
Hubert is not polite.
Hunter is not inquisitive.
Laurence is elegant.
Caldwell is informal.
Bud is not wrong.
Hubert is not few.
Laurence is polite.
Baldwin is not inquisitive.If there is someone who is either not wrong or few, then Hubert is not polite.
If there is at least one people who is both polite and not informal, then Caldwell is few.
If there is at least one people who is not few, then Hubert is informal and Hubert is not inquisitive.
If there is someone who is not inquisitive, then Hunter is wrong.
Hunter is elegant if and only if Laurence is not polite.
Baldwin being elegant implies that Bud is not inquisitive.
Someone being both not wrong and not polite is equivalent to being inquisitive.
All few people are inquisitive.
If there is someone who is both wrong and few, then Baldwin is not inquisitive and Anabelle is informal.
If someone is either polite or not wrong, then he is not inquisitive and elegant.
Baldwin being not inquisitive implies that Hubert is not few and Hunter is not elegant.
If someone is both informal and not polite, then he is not wrong. | Hubert is not wrong. | entailment |
Caldwell is few.
Baldwin is elegant.
Laurence is not informal.
Hubert is not elegant.
Hubert is not polite.
Hunter is not inquisitive.
Laurence is elegant.
Caldwell is informal.
Bud is not wrong.
Hubert is not few.
Laurence is polite.
Baldwin is not inquisitive.If there is someone who is either not wrong or few, then Hubert is not polite.
If there is at least one people who is both polite and not informal, then Caldwell is few.
If there is at least one people who is not few, then Hubert is informal and Hubert is not inquisitive.
If there is someone who is not inquisitive, then Hunter is wrong.
Hunter is elegant if and only if Laurence is not polite.
Baldwin being elegant implies that Bud is not inquisitive.
Someone being both not wrong and not polite is equivalent to being inquisitive.
All few people are inquisitive.
If there is someone who is both wrong and few, then Baldwin is not inquisitive and Anabelle is informal.
If someone is either polite or not wrong, then he is not inquisitive and elegant.
Baldwin being not inquisitive implies that Hubert is not few and Hunter is not elegant.
If someone is both informal and not polite, then he is not wrong. | Hunter is not few. | neutral |
Caldwell is few.
Baldwin is elegant.
Laurence is not informal.
Hubert is not elegant.
Hubert is not polite.
Hunter is not inquisitive.
Laurence is elegant.
Caldwell is informal.
Bud is not wrong.
Hubert is not few.
Laurence is polite.
Baldwin is not inquisitive.If there is someone who is either not wrong or few, then Hubert is not polite.
If there is at least one people who is both polite and not informal, then Caldwell is few.
If there is at least one people who is not few, then Hubert is informal and Hubert is not inquisitive.
If there is someone who is not inquisitive, then Hunter is wrong.
Hunter is elegant if and only if Laurence is not polite.
Baldwin being elegant implies that Bud is not inquisitive.
Someone being both not wrong and not polite is equivalent to being inquisitive.
All few people are inquisitive.
If there is someone who is both wrong and few, then Baldwin is not inquisitive and Anabelle is informal.
If someone is either polite or not wrong, then he is not inquisitive and elegant.
Baldwin being not inquisitive implies that Hubert is not few and Hunter is not elegant.
If someone is both informal and not polite, then he is not wrong. | Hubert is wrong. | contradiction |
Caldwell is few.
Baldwin is elegant.
Laurence is not informal.
Hubert is not elegant.
Hubert is not polite.
Hunter is not inquisitive.
Laurence is elegant.
Caldwell is informal.
Bud is not wrong.
Hubert is not few.
Laurence is polite.
Baldwin is not inquisitive.If there is someone who is either not wrong or few, then Hubert is not polite.
If there is at least one people who is both polite and not informal, then Caldwell is few.
If there is at least one people who is not few, then Hubert is informal and Hubert is not inquisitive.
If there is someone who is not inquisitive, then Hunter is wrong.
Hunter is elegant if and only if Laurence is not polite.
Baldwin being elegant implies that Bud is not inquisitive.
Someone being both not wrong and not polite is equivalent to being inquisitive.
All few people are inquisitive.
If there is someone who is both wrong and few, then Baldwin is not inquisitive and Anabelle is informal.
If someone is either polite or not wrong, then he is not inquisitive and elegant.
Baldwin being not inquisitive implies that Hubert is not few and Hunter is not elegant.
If someone is both informal and not polite, then he is not wrong. | Hubert is inquisitive. | self_contradiction |
Caldwell is few.
Baldwin is elegant.
Laurence is not informal.
Hubert is not elegant.
Hubert is not polite.
Hunter is not inquisitive.
Laurence is elegant.
Caldwell is informal.
Bud is not wrong.
Hubert is not few.
Laurence is polite.
Baldwin is not inquisitive.If there is someone who is either not wrong or few, then Hubert is not polite.
If there is at least one people who is both polite and not informal, then Caldwell is few.
If there is at least one people who is not few, then Hubert is informal and Hubert is not inquisitive.
If there is someone who is not inquisitive, then Hunter is wrong.
Hunter is elegant if and only if Laurence is not polite.
Baldwin being elegant implies that Bud is not inquisitive.
Someone being both not wrong and not polite is equivalent to being inquisitive.
All few people are inquisitive.
If there is someone who is both wrong and few, then Baldwin is not inquisitive and Anabelle is informal.
If someone is either polite or not wrong, then he is not inquisitive and elegant.
Baldwin being not inquisitive implies that Hubert is not few and Hunter is not elegant.
If someone is both informal and not polite, then he is not wrong. | Caldwell is not polite. | entailment |
Caldwell is few.
Baldwin is elegant.
Laurence is not informal.
Hubert is not elegant.
Hubert is not polite.
Hunter is not inquisitive.
Laurence is elegant.
Caldwell is informal.
Bud is not wrong.
Hubert is not few.
Laurence is polite.
Baldwin is not inquisitive.If there is someone who is either not wrong or few, then Hubert is not polite.
If there is at least one people who is both polite and not informal, then Caldwell is few.
If there is at least one people who is not few, then Hubert is informal and Hubert is not inquisitive.
If there is someone who is not inquisitive, then Hunter is wrong.
Hunter is elegant if and only if Laurence is not polite.
Baldwin being elegant implies that Bud is not inquisitive.
Someone being both not wrong and not polite is equivalent to being inquisitive.
All few people are inquisitive.
If there is someone who is both wrong and few, then Baldwin is not inquisitive and Anabelle is informal.
If someone is either polite or not wrong, then he is not inquisitive and elegant.
Baldwin being not inquisitive implies that Hubert is not few and Hunter is not elegant.
If someone is both informal and not polite, then he is not wrong. | Hubert is not elegant. | self_contradiction |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.