premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Matthew is not serious.
Matthew is sufficient.
Debra is not sufficient.
Martin is critical.
Chapman is sufficient.
Caldwell is not serious.
Debra is not serious.
Valentina is not better.
Debra is not better.
Silas is not medical.
Caldwell is not better.
Debra is critical.If Matthew is not medical, then Silas is not sufficient and Martin is serious.
Matthew being used is equivalent to Debra being not better and Matthew being medical.
If Valentina is not better, then Chapman is used and Silas is not critical.
Valentina is not better if and only if Valentina is not sufficient and Debra is not critical.
If there is someone who is either critical or used, then Debra is medical and Martin is not better.
If Valentina is not serious, then Debra is not better.
If Martin is not better and Debra is not used, then Valentina is serious and Silas is not sufficient.
Someone who is eithor not used or serious is always better.
If Matthew is not sufficient and Matthew is not medical, then Chapman is better.
If there is at least one people who is serious, then Debra is medical.
Silas is not critical if and only if Caldwell is not serious.
If someone is not used or he is not better, then he is serious. | Matthew is not medical. | neutral |
Matthew is not serious.
Matthew is sufficient.
Debra is not sufficient.
Martin is critical.
Chapman is sufficient.
Caldwell is not serious.
Debra is not serious.
Valentina is not better.
Debra is not better.
Silas is not medical.
Caldwell is not better.
Debra is critical.If Matthew is not medical, then Silas is not sufficient and Martin is serious.
Matthew being used is equivalent to Debra being not better and Matthew being medical.
If Valentina is not better, then Chapman is used and Silas is not critical.
Valentina is not better if and only if Valentina is not sufficient and Debra is not critical.
If there is someone who is either critical or used, then Debra is medical and Martin is not better.
If Valentina is not serious, then Debra is not better.
If Martin is not better and Debra is not used, then Valentina is serious and Silas is not sufficient.
Someone who is eithor not used or serious is always better.
If Matthew is not sufficient and Matthew is not medical, then Chapman is better.
If there is at least one people who is serious, then Debra is medical.
Silas is not critical if and only if Caldwell is not serious.
If someone is not used or he is not better, then he is serious. | Chapman is not used. | contradiction |
Matthew is not serious.
Matthew is sufficient.
Debra is not sufficient.
Martin is critical.
Chapman is sufficient.
Caldwell is not serious.
Debra is not serious.
Valentina is not better.
Debra is not better.
Silas is not medical.
Caldwell is not better.
Debra is critical.If Matthew is not medical, then Silas is not sufficient and Martin is serious.
Matthew being used is equivalent to Debra being not better and Matthew being medical.
If Valentina is not better, then Chapman is used and Silas is not critical.
Valentina is not better if and only if Valentina is not sufficient and Debra is not critical.
If there is someone who is either critical or used, then Debra is medical and Martin is not better.
If Valentina is not serious, then Debra is not better.
If Martin is not better and Debra is not used, then Valentina is serious and Silas is not sufficient.
Someone who is eithor not used or serious is always better.
If Matthew is not sufficient and Matthew is not medical, then Chapman is better.
If there is at least one people who is serious, then Debra is medical.
Silas is not critical if and only if Caldwell is not serious.
If someone is not used or he is not better, then he is serious. | Caldwell is serious. | self_contradiction |
Matthew is not serious.
Matthew is sufficient.
Debra is not sufficient.
Martin is critical.
Chapman is sufficient.
Caldwell is not serious.
Debra is not serious.
Valentina is not better.
Debra is not better.
Silas is not medical.
Caldwell is not better.
Debra is critical.If Matthew is not medical, then Silas is not sufficient and Martin is serious.
Matthew being used is equivalent to Debra being not better and Matthew being medical.
If Valentina is not better, then Chapman is used and Silas is not critical.
Valentina is not better if and only if Valentina is not sufficient and Debra is not critical.
If there is someone who is either critical or used, then Debra is medical and Martin is not better.
If Valentina is not serious, then Debra is not better.
If Martin is not better and Debra is not used, then Valentina is serious and Silas is not sufficient.
Someone who is eithor not used or serious is always better.
If Matthew is not sufficient and Matthew is not medical, then Chapman is better.
If there is at least one people who is serious, then Debra is medical.
Silas is not critical if and only if Caldwell is not serious.
If someone is not used or he is not better, then he is serious. | Silas is medical. | contradiction |
Matthew is not serious.
Matthew is sufficient.
Debra is not sufficient.
Martin is critical.
Chapman is sufficient.
Caldwell is not serious.
Debra is not serious.
Valentina is not better.
Debra is not better.
Silas is not medical.
Caldwell is not better.
Debra is critical.If Matthew is not medical, then Silas is not sufficient and Martin is serious.
Matthew being used is equivalent to Debra being not better and Matthew being medical.
If Valentina is not better, then Chapman is used and Silas is not critical.
Valentina is not better if and only if Valentina is not sufficient and Debra is not critical.
If there is someone who is either critical or used, then Debra is medical and Martin is not better.
If Valentina is not serious, then Debra is not better.
If Martin is not better and Debra is not used, then Valentina is serious and Silas is not sufficient.
Someone who is eithor not used or serious is always better.
If Matthew is not sufficient and Matthew is not medical, then Chapman is better.
If there is at least one people who is serious, then Debra is medical.
Silas is not critical if and only if Caldwell is not serious.
If someone is not used or he is not better, then he is serious. | Martin is not critical. | contradiction |
Matthew is not serious.
Matthew is sufficient.
Debra is not sufficient.
Martin is critical.
Chapman is sufficient.
Caldwell is not serious.
Debra is not serious.
Valentina is not better.
Debra is not better.
Silas is not medical.
Caldwell is not better.
Debra is critical.If Matthew is not medical, then Silas is not sufficient and Martin is serious.
Matthew being used is equivalent to Debra being not better and Matthew being medical.
If Valentina is not better, then Chapman is used and Silas is not critical.
Valentina is not better if and only if Valentina is not sufficient and Debra is not critical.
If there is someone who is either critical or used, then Debra is medical and Martin is not better.
If Valentina is not serious, then Debra is not better.
If Martin is not better and Debra is not used, then Valentina is serious and Silas is not sufficient.
Someone who is eithor not used or serious is always better.
If Matthew is not sufficient and Matthew is not medical, then Chapman is better.
If there is at least one people who is serious, then Debra is medical.
Silas is not critical if and only if Caldwell is not serious.
If someone is not used or he is not better, then he is serious. | Chapman is used. | entailment |
Matthew is not serious.
Matthew is sufficient.
Debra is not sufficient.
Martin is critical.
Chapman is sufficient.
Caldwell is not serious.
Debra is not serious.
Valentina is not better.
Debra is not better.
Silas is not medical.
Caldwell is not better.
Debra is critical.If Matthew is not medical, then Silas is not sufficient and Martin is serious.
Matthew being used is equivalent to Debra being not better and Matthew being medical.
If Valentina is not better, then Chapman is used and Silas is not critical.
Valentina is not better if and only if Valentina is not sufficient and Debra is not critical.
If there is someone who is either critical or used, then Debra is medical and Martin is not better.
If Valentina is not serious, then Debra is not better.
If Martin is not better and Debra is not used, then Valentina is serious and Silas is not sufficient.
Someone who is eithor not used or serious is always better.
If Matthew is not sufficient and Matthew is not medical, then Chapman is better.
If there is at least one people who is serious, then Debra is medical.
Silas is not critical if and only if Caldwell is not serious.
If someone is not used or he is not better, then he is serious. | Debra is not medical. | contradiction |
Matthew is not serious.
Matthew is sufficient.
Debra is not sufficient.
Martin is critical.
Chapman is sufficient.
Caldwell is not serious.
Debra is not serious.
Valentina is not better.
Debra is not better.
Silas is not medical.
Caldwell is not better.
Debra is critical.If Matthew is not medical, then Silas is not sufficient and Martin is serious.
Matthew being used is equivalent to Debra being not better and Matthew being medical.
If Valentina is not better, then Chapman is used and Silas is not critical.
Valentina is not better if and only if Valentina is not sufficient and Debra is not critical.
If there is someone who is either critical or used, then Debra is medical and Martin is not better.
If Valentina is not serious, then Debra is not better.
If Martin is not better and Debra is not used, then Valentina is serious and Silas is not sufficient.
Someone who is eithor not used or serious is always better.
If Matthew is not sufficient and Matthew is not medical, then Chapman is better.
If there is at least one people who is serious, then Debra is medical.
Silas is not critical if and only if Caldwell is not serious.
If someone is not used or he is not better, then he is serious. | Chapman is not better. | neutral |
Matthew is not serious.
Matthew is sufficient.
Debra is not sufficient.
Martin is critical.
Chapman is sufficient.
Caldwell is not serious.
Debra is not serious.
Valentina is not better.
Debra is not better.
Silas is not medical.
Caldwell is not better.
Debra is critical.If Matthew is not medical, then Silas is not sufficient and Martin is serious.
Matthew being used is equivalent to Debra being not better and Matthew being medical.
If Valentina is not better, then Chapman is used and Silas is not critical.
Valentina is not better if and only if Valentina is not sufficient and Debra is not critical.
If there is someone who is either critical or used, then Debra is medical and Martin is not better.
If Valentina is not serious, then Debra is not better.
If Martin is not better and Debra is not used, then Valentina is serious and Silas is not sufficient.
Someone who is eithor not used or serious is always better.
If Matthew is not sufficient and Matthew is not medical, then Chapman is better.
If there is at least one people who is serious, then Debra is medical.
Silas is not critical if and only if Caldwell is not serious.
If someone is not used or he is not better, then he is serious. | Valentina is not used. | neutral |
Matthew is not serious.
Matthew is sufficient.
Debra is not sufficient.
Martin is critical.
Chapman is sufficient.
Caldwell is not serious.
Debra is not serious.
Valentina is not better.
Debra is not better.
Silas is not medical.
Caldwell is not better.
Debra is critical.If Matthew is not medical, then Silas is not sufficient and Martin is serious.
Matthew being used is equivalent to Debra being not better and Matthew being medical.
If Valentina is not better, then Chapman is used and Silas is not critical.
Valentina is not better if and only if Valentina is not sufficient and Debra is not critical.
If there is someone who is either critical or used, then Debra is medical and Martin is not better.
If Valentina is not serious, then Debra is not better.
If Martin is not better and Debra is not used, then Valentina is serious and Silas is not sufficient.
Someone who is eithor not used or serious is always better.
If Matthew is not sufficient and Matthew is not medical, then Chapman is better.
If there is at least one people who is serious, then Debra is medical.
Silas is not critical if and only if Caldwell is not serious.
If someone is not used or he is not better, then he is serious. | Valentina is not better. | self_contradiction |
Matthew is not serious.
Matthew is sufficient.
Debra is not sufficient.
Martin is critical.
Chapman is sufficient.
Caldwell is not serious.
Debra is not serious.
Valentina is not better.
Debra is not better.
Silas is not medical.
Caldwell is not better.
Debra is critical.If Matthew is not medical, then Silas is not sufficient and Martin is serious.
Matthew being used is equivalent to Debra being not better and Matthew being medical.
If Valentina is not better, then Chapman is used and Silas is not critical.
Valentina is not better if and only if Valentina is not sufficient and Debra is not critical.
If there is someone who is either critical or used, then Debra is medical and Martin is not better.
If Valentina is not serious, then Debra is not better.
If Martin is not better and Debra is not used, then Valentina is serious and Silas is not sufficient.
Someone who is eithor not used or serious is always better.
If Matthew is not sufficient and Matthew is not medical, then Chapman is better.
If there is at least one people who is serious, then Debra is medical.
Silas is not critical if and only if Caldwell is not serious.
If someone is not used or he is not better, then he is serious. | Valentina is better. | self_contradiction |
Matthew is not serious.
Matthew is sufficient.
Debra is not sufficient.
Martin is critical.
Chapman is sufficient.
Caldwell is not serious.
Debra is not serious.
Valentina is not better.
Debra is not better.
Silas is not medical.
Caldwell is not better.
Debra is critical.If Matthew is not medical, then Silas is not sufficient and Martin is serious.
Matthew being used is equivalent to Debra being not better and Matthew being medical.
If Valentina is not better, then Chapman is used and Silas is not critical.
Valentina is not better if and only if Valentina is not sufficient and Debra is not critical.
If there is someone who is either critical or used, then Debra is medical and Martin is not better.
If Valentina is not serious, then Debra is not better.
If Martin is not better and Debra is not used, then Valentina is serious and Silas is not sufficient.
Someone who is eithor not used or serious is always better.
If Matthew is not sufficient and Matthew is not medical, then Chapman is better.
If there is at least one people who is serious, then Debra is medical.
Silas is not critical if and only if Caldwell is not serious.
If someone is not used or he is not better, then he is serious. | Silas is critical. | contradiction |
Matthew is not serious.
Matthew is sufficient.
Debra is not sufficient.
Martin is critical.
Chapman is sufficient.
Caldwell is not serious.
Debra is not serious.
Valentina is not better.
Debra is not better.
Silas is not medical.
Caldwell is not better.
Debra is critical.If Matthew is not medical, then Silas is not sufficient and Martin is serious.
Matthew being used is equivalent to Debra being not better and Matthew being medical.
If Valentina is not better, then Chapman is used and Silas is not critical.
Valentina is not better if and only if Valentina is not sufficient and Debra is not critical.
If there is someone who is either critical or used, then Debra is medical and Martin is not better.
If Valentina is not serious, then Debra is not better.
If Martin is not better and Debra is not used, then Valentina is serious and Silas is not sufficient.
Someone who is eithor not used or serious is always better.
If Matthew is not sufficient and Matthew is not medical, then Chapman is better.
If there is at least one people who is serious, then Debra is medical.
Silas is not critical if and only if Caldwell is not serious.
If someone is not used or he is not better, then he is serious. | Caldwell is better. | self_contradiction |
Matthew is not serious.
Matthew is sufficient.
Debra is not sufficient.
Martin is critical.
Chapman is sufficient.
Caldwell is not serious.
Debra is not serious.
Valentina is not better.
Debra is not better.
Silas is not medical.
Caldwell is not better.
Debra is critical.If Matthew is not medical, then Silas is not sufficient and Martin is serious.
Matthew being used is equivalent to Debra being not better and Matthew being medical.
If Valentina is not better, then Chapman is used and Silas is not critical.
Valentina is not better if and only if Valentina is not sufficient and Debra is not critical.
If there is someone who is either critical or used, then Debra is medical and Martin is not better.
If Valentina is not serious, then Debra is not better.
If Martin is not better and Debra is not used, then Valentina is serious and Silas is not sufficient.
Someone who is eithor not used or serious is always better.
If Matthew is not sufficient and Matthew is not medical, then Chapman is better.
If there is at least one people who is serious, then Debra is medical.
Silas is not critical if and only if Caldwell is not serious.
If someone is not used or he is not better, then he is serious. | Matthew is sufficient. | entailment |
Matthew is not serious.
Matthew is sufficient.
Debra is not sufficient.
Martin is critical.
Chapman is sufficient.
Caldwell is not serious.
Debra is not serious.
Valentina is not better.
Debra is not better.
Silas is not medical.
Caldwell is not better.
Debra is critical.If Matthew is not medical, then Silas is not sufficient and Martin is serious.
Matthew being used is equivalent to Debra being not better and Matthew being medical.
If Valentina is not better, then Chapman is used and Silas is not critical.
Valentina is not better if and only if Valentina is not sufficient and Debra is not critical.
If there is someone who is either critical or used, then Debra is medical and Martin is not better.
If Valentina is not serious, then Debra is not better.
If Martin is not better and Debra is not used, then Valentina is serious and Silas is not sufficient.
Someone who is eithor not used or serious is always better.
If Matthew is not sufficient and Matthew is not medical, then Chapman is better.
If there is at least one people who is serious, then Debra is medical.
Silas is not critical if and only if Caldwell is not serious.
If someone is not used or he is not better, then he is serious. | Martin is critical. | entailment |
Matthew is not serious.
Matthew is sufficient.
Debra is not sufficient.
Martin is critical.
Chapman is sufficient.
Caldwell is not serious.
Debra is not serious.
Valentina is not better.
Debra is not better.
Silas is not medical.
Caldwell is not better.
Debra is critical.If Matthew is not medical, then Silas is not sufficient and Martin is serious.
Matthew being used is equivalent to Debra being not better and Matthew being medical.
If Valentina is not better, then Chapman is used and Silas is not critical.
Valentina is not better if and only if Valentina is not sufficient and Debra is not critical.
If there is someone who is either critical or used, then Debra is medical and Martin is not better.
If Valentina is not serious, then Debra is not better.
If Martin is not better and Debra is not used, then Valentina is serious and Silas is not sufficient.
Someone who is eithor not used or serious is always better.
If Matthew is not sufficient and Matthew is not medical, then Chapman is better.
If there is at least one people who is serious, then Debra is medical.
Silas is not critical if and only if Caldwell is not serious.
If someone is not used or he is not better, then he is serious. | Debra is serious. | self_contradiction |
Matthew is not serious.
Matthew is sufficient.
Debra is not sufficient.
Martin is critical.
Chapman is sufficient.
Caldwell is not serious.
Debra is not serious.
Valentina is not better.
Debra is not better.
Silas is not medical.
Caldwell is not better.
Debra is critical.If Matthew is not medical, then Silas is not sufficient and Martin is serious.
Matthew being used is equivalent to Debra being not better and Matthew being medical.
If Valentina is not better, then Chapman is used and Silas is not critical.
Valentina is not better if and only if Valentina is not sufficient and Debra is not critical.
If there is someone who is either critical or used, then Debra is medical and Martin is not better.
If Valentina is not serious, then Debra is not better.
If Martin is not better and Debra is not used, then Valentina is serious and Silas is not sufficient.
Someone who is eithor not used or serious is always better.
If Matthew is not sufficient and Matthew is not medical, then Chapman is better.
If there is at least one people who is serious, then Debra is medical.
Silas is not critical if and only if Caldwell is not serious.
If someone is not used or he is not better, then he is serious. | Caldwell is used. | neutral |
Matthew is not serious.
Matthew is sufficient.
Debra is not sufficient.
Martin is critical.
Chapman is sufficient.
Caldwell is not serious.
Debra is not serious.
Valentina is not better.
Debra is not better.
Silas is not medical.
Caldwell is not better.
Debra is critical.If Matthew is not medical, then Silas is not sufficient and Martin is serious.
Matthew being used is equivalent to Debra being not better and Matthew being medical.
If Valentina is not better, then Chapman is used and Silas is not critical.
Valentina is not better if and only if Valentina is not sufficient and Debra is not critical.
If there is someone who is either critical or used, then Debra is medical and Martin is not better.
If Valentina is not serious, then Debra is not better.
If Martin is not better and Debra is not used, then Valentina is serious and Silas is not sufficient.
Someone who is eithor not used or serious is always better.
If Matthew is not sufficient and Matthew is not medical, then Chapman is better.
If there is at least one people who is serious, then Debra is medical.
Silas is not critical if and only if Caldwell is not serious.
If someone is not used or he is not better, then he is serious. | Silas is serious. | neutral |
Matthew is not serious.
Matthew is sufficient.
Debra is not sufficient.
Martin is critical.
Chapman is sufficient.
Caldwell is not serious.
Debra is not serious.
Valentina is not better.
Debra is not better.
Silas is not medical.
Caldwell is not better.
Debra is critical.If Matthew is not medical, then Silas is not sufficient and Martin is serious.
Matthew being used is equivalent to Debra being not better and Matthew being medical.
If Valentina is not better, then Chapman is used and Silas is not critical.
Valentina is not better if and only if Valentina is not sufficient and Debra is not critical.
If there is someone who is either critical or used, then Debra is medical and Martin is not better.
If Valentina is not serious, then Debra is not better.
If Martin is not better and Debra is not used, then Valentina is serious and Silas is not sufficient.
Someone who is eithor not used or serious is always better.
If Matthew is not sufficient and Matthew is not medical, then Chapman is better.
If there is at least one people who is serious, then Debra is medical.
Silas is not critical if and only if Caldwell is not serious.
If someone is not used or he is not better, then he is serious. | Silas is not medical. | entailment |
Matthew is not serious.
Matthew is sufficient.
Debra is not sufficient.
Martin is critical.
Chapman is sufficient.
Caldwell is not serious.
Debra is not serious.
Valentina is not better.
Debra is not better.
Silas is not medical.
Caldwell is not better.
Debra is critical.If Matthew is not medical, then Silas is not sufficient and Martin is serious.
Matthew being used is equivalent to Debra being not better and Matthew being medical.
If Valentina is not better, then Chapman is used and Silas is not critical.
Valentina is not better if and only if Valentina is not sufficient and Debra is not critical.
If there is someone who is either critical or used, then Debra is medical and Martin is not better.
If Valentina is not serious, then Debra is not better.
If Martin is not better and Debra is not used, then Valentina is serious and Silas is not sufficient.
Someone who is eithor not used or serious is always better.
If Matthew is not sufficient and Matthew is not medical, then Chapman is better.
If there is at least one people who is serious, then Debra is medical.
Silas is not critical if and only if Caldwell is not serious.
If someone is not used or he is not better, then he is serious. | Chapman is sufficient. | entailment |
Norman is not massive.
Michael is not humble.
Sean is compassionate.
Michael is not compassionate.
Hanna is compassionate.
Michael is not right.
Silas is not tart.
Michael is tart.
Bud is not entire.
Silas is right.
Hanna is not right.
Norman is not humble.If someone is tart and not massive, then he is compassionate, and vice versa.
If everyone is tart or not entire, then Baird is not right.
Someone is humble and not compassionate if and only if he is not massive and not entire.
If someone is massive and entire, then he is both not compassionate and tart, and vice versa.
Bud being not compassionate is equivalent to Sean being not massive.
It can be concluded that Sean is entire once knowing that Silas is right or Michael is massive.
It can be concluded that Silas is not right and Michael is entire once knowing that Hanna is compassionate.
If someone who is compassionate is also not tart, then he is not right.
Someone being not tart is equivalent to being entire.
If someone who is not tart is also not humble, then he is massive.
If there is someone who is either not massive or not entire, then Norman is humble.
It can be concluded that Silas is not right and Silas is not tart once knowing that Sean is humble. | Baird is not humble. | neutral |
Norman is not massive.
Michael is not humble.
Sean is compassionate.
Michael is not compassionate.
Hanna is compassionate.
Michael is not right.
Silas is not tart.
Michael is tart.
Bud is not entire.
Silas is right.
Hanna is not right.
Norman is not humble.If someone is tart and not massive, then he is compassionate, and vice versa.
If everyone is tart or not entire, then Baird is not right.
Someone is humble and not compassionate if and only if he is not massive and not entire.
If someone is massive and entire, then he is both not compassionate and tart, and vice versa.
Bud being not compassionate is equivalent to Sean being not massive.
It can be concluded that Sean is entire once knowing that Silas is right or Michael is massive.
It can be concluded that Silas is not right and Michael is entire once knowing that Hanna is compassionate.
If someone who is compassionate is also not tart, then he is not right.
Someone being not tart is equivalent to being entire.
If someone who is not tart is also not humble, then he is massive.
If there is someone who is either not massive or not entire, then Norman is humble.
It can be concluded that Silas is not right and Silas is not tart once knowing that Sean is humble. | Silas is not humble. | neutral |
Norman is not massive.
Michael is not humble.
Sean is compassionate.
Michael is not compassionate.
Hanna is compassionate.
Michael is not right.
Silas is not tart.
Michael is tart.
Bud is not entire.
Silas is right.
Hanna is not right.
Norman is not humble.If someone is tart and not massive, then he is compassionate, and vice versa.
If everyone is tart or not entire, then Baird is not right.
Someone is humble and not compassionate if and only if he is not massive and not entire.
If someone is massive and entire, then he is both not compassionate and tart, and vice versa.
Bud being not compassionate is equivalent to Sean being not massive.
It can be concluded that Sean is entire once knowing that Silas is right or Michael is massive.
It can be concluded that Silas is not right and Michael is entire once knowing that Hanna is compassionate.
If someone who is compassionate is also not tart, then he is not right.
Someone being not tart is equivalent to being entire.
If someone who is not tart is also not humble, then he is massive.
If there is someone who is either not massive or not entire, then Norman is humble.
It can be concluded that Silas is not right and Silas is not tart once knowing that Sean is humble. | Norman is massive. | contradiction |
Norman is not massive.
Michael is not humble.
Sean is compassionate.
Michael is not compassionate.
Hanna is compassionate.
Michael is not right.
Silas is not tart.
Michael is tart.
Bud is not entire.
Silas is right.
Hanna is not right.
Norman is not humble.If someone is tart and not massive, then he is compassionate, and vice versa.
If everyone is tart or not entire, then Baird is not right.
Someone is humble and not compassionate if and only if he is not massive and not entire.
If someone is massive and entire, then he is both not compassionate and tart, and vice versa.
Bud being not compassionate is equivalent to Sean being not massive.
It can be concluded that Sean is entire once knowing that Silas is right or Michael is massive.
It can be concluded that Silas is not right and Michael is entire once knowing that Hanna is compassionate.
If someone who is compassionate is also not tart, then he is not right.
Someone being not tart is equivalent to being entire.
If someone who is not tart is also not humble, then he is massive.
If there is someone who is either not massive or not entire, then Norman is humble.
It can be concluded that Silas is not right and Silas is not tart once knowing that Sean is humble. | Silas is not right. | self_contradiction |
Norman is not massive.
Michael is not humble.
Sean is compassionate.
Michael is not compassionate.
Hanna is compassionate.
Michael is not right.
Silas is not tart.
Michael is tart.
Bud is not entire.
Silas is right.
Hanna is not right.
Norman is not humble.If someone is tart and not massive, then he is compassionate, and vice versa.
If everyone is tart or not entire, then Baird is not right.
Someone is humble and not compassionate if and only if he is not massive and not entire.
If someone is massive and entire, then he is both not compassionate and tart, and vice versa.
Bud being not compassionate is equivalent to Sean being not massive.
It can be concluded that Sean is entire once knowing that Silas is right or Michael is massive.
It can be concluded that Silas is not right and Michael is entire once knowing that Hanna is compassionate.
If someone who is compassionate is also not tart, then he is not right.
Someone being not tart is equivalent to being entire.
If someone who is not tart is also not humble, then he is massive.
If there is someone who is either not massive or not entire, then Norman is humble.
It can be concluded that Silas is not right and Silas is not tart once knowing that Sean is humble. | Sean is tart. | self_contradiction |
Norman is not massive.
Michael is not humble.
Sean is compassionate.
Michael is not compassionate.
Hanna is compassionate.
Michael is not right.
Silas is not tart.
Michael is tart.
Bud is not entire.
Silas is right.
Hanna is not right.
Norman is not humble.If someone is tart and not massive, then he is compassionate, and vice versa.
If everyone is tart or not entire, then Baird is not right.
Someone is humble and not compassionate if and only if he is not massive and not entire.
If someone is massive and entire, then he is both not compassionate and tart, and vice versa.
Bud being not compassionate is equivalent to Sean being not massive.
It can be concluded that Sean is entire once knowing that Silas is right or Michael is massive.
It can be concluded that Silas is not right and Michael is entire once knowing that Hanna is compassionate.
If someone who is compassionate is also not tart, then he is not right.
Someone being not tart is equivalent to being entire.
If someone who is not tart is also not humble, then he is massive.
If there is someone who is either not massive or not entire, then Norman is humble.
It can be concluded that Silas is not right and Silas is not tart once knowing that Sean is humble. | Michael is massive. | entailment |
Norman is not massive.
Michael is not humble.
Sean is compassionate.
Michael is not compassionate.
Hanna is compassionate.
Michael is not right.
Silas is not tart.
Michael is tart.
Bud is not entire.
Silas is right.
Hanna is not right.
Norman is not humble.If someone is tart and not massive, then he is compassionate, and vice versa.
If everyone is tart or not entire, then Baird is not right.
Someone is humble and not compassionate if and only if he is not massive and not entire.
If someone is massive and entire, then he is both not compassionate and tart, and vice versa.
Bud being not compassionate is equivalent to Sean being not massive.
It can be concluded that Sean is entire once knowing that Silas is right or Michael is massive.
It can be concluded that Silas is not right and Michael is entire once knowing that Hanna is compassionate.
If someone who is compassionate is also not tart, then he is not right.
Someone being not tart is equivalent to being entire.
If someone who is not tart is also not humble, then he is massive.
If there is someone who is either not massive or not entire, then Norman is humble.
It can be concluded that Silas is not right and Silas is not tart once knowing that Sean is humble. | Norman is not massive. | entailment |
Norman is not massive.
Michael is not humble.
Sean is compassionate.
Michael is not compassionate.
Hanna is compassionate.
Michael is not right.
Silas is not tart.
Michael is tart.
Bud is not entire.
Silas is right.
Hanna is not right.
Norman is not humble.If someone is tart and not massive, then he is compassionate, and vice versa.
If everyone is tart or not entire, then Baird is not right.
Someone is humble and not compassionate if and only if he is not massive and not entire.
If someone is massive and entire, then he is both not compassionate and tart, and vice versa.
Bud being not compassionate is equivalent to Sean being not massive.
It can be concluded that Sean is entire once knowing that Silas is right or Michael is massive.
It can be concluded that Silas is not right and Michael is entire once knowing that Hanna is compassionate.
If someone who is compassionate is also not tart, then he is not right.
Someone being not tart is equivalent to being entire.
If someone who is not tart is also not humble, then he is massive.
If there is someone who is either not massive or not entire, then Norman is humble.
It can be concluded that Silas is not right and Silas is not tart once knowing that Sean is humble. | Michael is not humble. | entailment |
Norman is not massive.
Michael is not humble.
Sean is compassionate.
Michael is not compassionate.
Hanna is compassionate.
Michael is not right.
Silas is not tart.
Michael is tart.
Bud is not entire.
Silas is right.
Hanna is not right.
Norman is not humble.If someone is tart and not massive, then he is compassionate, and vice versa.
If everyone is tart or not entire, then Baird is not right.
Someone is humble and not compassionate if and only if he is not massive and not entire.
If someone is massive and entire, then he is both not compassionate and tart, and vice versa.
Bud being not compassionate is equivalent to Sean being not massive.
It can be concluded that Sean is entire once knowing that Silas is right or Michael is massive.
It can be concluded that Silas is not right and Michael is entire once knowing that Hanna is compassionate.
If someone who is compassionate is also not tart, then he is not right.
Someone being not tart is equivalent to being entire.
If someone who is not tart is also not humble, then he is massive.
If there is someone who is either not massive or not entire, then Norman is humble.
It can be concluded that Silas is not right and Silas is not tart once knowing that Sean is humble. | Michael is not massive. | contradiction |
Norman is not massive.
Michael is not humble.
Sean is compassionate.
Michael is not compassionate.
Hanna is compassionate.
Michael is not right.
Silas is not tart.
Michael is tart.
Bud is not entire.
Silas is right.
Hanna is not right.
Norman is not humble.If someone is tart and not massive, then he is compassionate, and vice versa.
If everyone is tart or not entire, then Baird is not right.
Someone is humble and not compassionate if and only if he is not massive and not entire.
If someone is massive and entire, then he is both not compassionate and tart, and vice versa.
Bud being not compassionate is equivalent to Sean being not massive.
It can be concluded that Sean is entire once knowing that Silas is right or Michael is massive.
It can be concluded that Silas is not right and Michael is entire once knowing that Hanna is compassionate.
If someone who is compassionate is also not tart, then he is not right.
Someone being not tart is equivalent to being entire.
If someone who is not tart is also not humble, then he is massive.
If there is someone who is either not massive or not entire, then Norman is humble.
It can be concluded that Silas is not right and Silas is not tart once knowing that Sean is humble. | Michael is compassionate. | contradiction |
Norman is not massive.
Michael is not humble.
Sean is compassionate.
Michael is not compassionate.
Hanna is compassionate.
Michael is not right.
Silas is not tart.
Michael is tart.
Bud is not entire.
Silas is right.
Hanna is not right.
Norman is not humble.If someone is tart and not massive, then he is compassionate, and vice versa.
If everyone is tart or not entire, then Baird is not right.
Someone is humble and not compassionate if and only if he is not massive and not entire.
If someone is massive and entire, then he is both not compassionate and tart, and vice versa.
Bud being not compassionate is equivalent to Sean being not massive.
It can be concluded that Sean is entire once knowing that Silas is right or Michael is massive.
It can be concluded that Silas is not right and Michael is entire once knowing that Hanna is compassionate.
If someone who is compassionate is also not tart, then he is not right.
Someone being not tart is equivalent to being entire.
If someone who is not tart is also not humble, then he is massive.
If there is someone who is either not massive or not entire, then Norman is humble.
It can be concluded that Silas is not right and Silas is not tart once knowing that Sean is humble. | Hanna is not humble. | neutral |
Norman is not massive.
Michael is not humble.
Sean is compassionate.
Michael is not compassionate.
Hanna is compassionate.
Michael is not right.
Silas is not tart.
Michael is tart.
Bud is not entire.
Silas is right.
Hanna is not right.
Norman is not humble.If someone is tart and not massive, then he is compassionate, and vice versa.
If everyone is tart or not entire, then Baird is not right.
Someone is humble and not compassionate if and only if he is not massive and not entire.
If someone is massive and entire, then he is both not compassionate and tart, and vice versa.
Bud being not compassionate is equivalent to Sean being not massive.
It can be concluded that Sean is entire once knowing that Silas is right or Michael is massive.
It can be concluded that Silas is not right and Michael is entire once knowing that Hanna is compassionate.
If someone who is compassionate is also not tart, then he is not right.
Someone being not tart is equivalent to being entire.
If someone who is not tart is also not humble, then he is massive.
If there is someone who is either not massive or not entire, then Norman is humble.
It can be concluded that Silas is not right and Silas is not tart once knowing that Sean is humble. | Silas is massive. | neutral |
Norman is not massive.
Michael is not humble.
Sean is compassionate.
Michael is not compassionate.
Hanna is compassionate.
Michael is not right.
Silas is not tart.
Michael is tart.
Bud is not entire.
Silas is right.
Hanna is not right.
Norman is not humble.If someone is tart and not massive, then he is compassionate, and vice versa.
If everyone is tart or not entire, then Baird is not right.
Someone is humble and not compassionate if and only if he is not massive and not entire.
If someone is massive and entire, then he is both not compassionate and tart, and vice versa.
Bud being not compassionate is equivalent to Sean being not massive.
It can be concluded that Sean is entire once knowing that Silas is right or Michael is massive.
It can be concluded that Silas is not right and Michael is entire once knowing that Hanna is compassionate.
If someone who is compassionate is also not tart, then he is not right.
Someone being not tart is equivalent to being entire.
If someone who is not tart is also not humble, then he is massive.
If there is someone who is either not massive or not entire, then Norman is humble.
It can be concluded that Silas is not right and Silas is not tart once knowing that Sean is humble. | Sean is massive. | contradiction |
Norman is not massive.
Michael is not humble.
Sean is compassionate.
Michael is not compassionate.
Hanna is compassionate.
Michael is not right.
Silas is not tart.
Michael is tart.
Bud is not entire.
Silas is right.
Hanna is not right.
Norman is not humble.If someone is tart and not massive, then he is compassionate, and vice versa.
If everyone is tart or not entire, then Baird is not right.
Someone is humble and not compassionate if and only if he is not massive and not entire.
If someone is massive and entire, then he is both not compassionate and tart, and vice versa.
Bud being not compassionate is equivalent to Sean being not massive.
It can be concluded that Sean is entire once knowing that Silas is right or Michael is massive.
It can be concluded that Silas is not right and Michael is entire once knowing that Hanna is compassionate.
If someone who is compassionate is also not tart, then he is not right.
Someone being not tart is equivalent to being entire.
If someone who is not tart is also not humble, then he is massive.
If there is someone who is either not massive or not entire, then Norman is humble.
It can be concluded that Silas is not right and Silas is not tart once knowing that Sean is humble. | Michael is not tart. | self_contradiction |
Norman is not massive.
Michael is not humble.
Sean is compassionate.
Michael is not compassionate.
Hanna is compassionate.
Michael is not right.
Silas is not tart.
Michael is tart.
Bud is not entire.
Silas is right.
Hanna is not right.
Norman is not humble.If someone is tart and not massive, then he is compassionate, and vice versa.
If everyone is tart or not entire, then Baird is not right.
Someone is humble and not compassionate if and only if he is not massive and not entire.
If someone is massive and entire, then he is both not compassionate and tart, and vice versa.
Bud being not compassionate is equivalent to Sean being not massive.
It can be concluded that Sean is entire once knowing that Silas is right or Michael is massive.
It can be concluded that Silas is not right and Michael is entire once knowing that Hanna is compassionate.
If someone who is compassionate is also not tart, then he is not right.
Someone being not tart is equivalent to being entire.
If someone who is not tart is also not humble, then he is massive.
If there is someone who is either not massive or not entire, then Norman is humble.
It can be concluded that Silas is not right and Silas is not tart once knowing that Sean is humble. | Silas is tart. | contradiction |
Norman is not massive.
Michael is not humble.
Sean is compassionate.
Michael is not compassionate.
Hanna is compassionate.
Michael is not right.
Silas is not tart.
Michael is tart.
Bud is not entire.
Silas is right.
Hanna is not right.
Norman is not humble.If someone is tart and not massive, then he is compassionate, and vice versa.
If everyone is tart or not entire, then Baird is not right.
Someone is humble and not compassionate if and only if he is not massive and not entire.
If someone is massive and entire, then he is both not compassionate and tart, and vice versa.
Bud being not compassionate is equivalent to Sean being not massive.
It can be concluded that Sean is entire once knowing that Silas is right or Michael is massive.
It can be concluded that Silas is not right and Michael is entire once knowing that Hanna is compassionate.
If someone who is compassionate is also not tart, then he is not right.
Someone being not tart is equivalent to being entire.
If someone who is not tart is also not humble, then he is massive.
If there is someone who is either not massive or not entire, then Norman is humble.
It can be concluded that Silas is not right and Silas is not tart once knowing that Sean is humble. | Norman is not humble. | self_contradiction |
Norman is not massive.
Michael is not humble.
Sean is compassionate.
Michael is not compassionate.
Hanna is compassionate.
Michael is not right.
Silas is not tart.
Michael is tart.
Bud is not entire.
Silas is right.
Hanna is not right.
Norman is not humble.If someone is tart and not massive, then he is compassionate, and vice versa.
If everyone is tart or not entire, then Baird is not right.
Someone is humble and not compassionate if and only if he is not massive and not entire.
If someone is massive and entire, then he is both not compassionate and tart, and vice versa.
Bud being not compassionate is equivalent to Sean being not massive.
It can be concluded that Sean is entire once knowing that Silas is right or Michael is massive.
It can be concluded that Silas is not right and Michael is entire once knowing that Hanna is compassionate.
If someone who is compassionate is also not tart, then he is not right.
Someone being not tart is equivalent to being entire.
If someone who is not tart is also not humble, then he is massive.
If there is someone who is either not massive or not entire, then Norman is humble.
It can be concluded that Silas is not right and Silas is not tart once knowing that Sean is humble. | Sean is not right. | entailment |
Norman is not massive.
Michael is not humble.
Sean is compassionate.
Michael is not compassionate.
Hanna is compassionate.
Michael is not right.
Silas is not tart.
Michael is tart.
Bud is not entire.
Silas is right.
Hanna is not right.
Norman is not humble.If someone is tart and not massive, then he is compassionate, and vice versa.
If everyone is tart or not entire, then Baird is not right.
Someone is humble and not compassionate if and only if he is not massive and not entire.
If someone is massive and entire, then he is both not compassionate and tart, and vice versa.
Bud being not compassionate is equivalent to Sean being not massive.
It can be concluded that Sean is entire once knowing that Silas is right or Michael is massive.
It can be concluded that Silas is not right and Michael is entire once knowing that Hanna is compassionate.
If someone who is compassionate is also not tart, then he is not right.
Someone being not tart is equivalent to being entire.
If someone who is not tart is also not humble, then he is massive.
If there is someone who is either not massive or not entire, then Norman is humble.
It can be concluded that Silas is not right and Silas is not tart once knowing that Sean is humble. | Sean is not tart. | self_contradiction |
Norman is not massive.
Michael is not humble.
Sean is compassionate.
Michael is not compassionate.
Hanna is compassionate.
Michael is not right.
Silas is not tart.
Michael is tart.
Bud is not entire.
Silas is right.
Hanna is not right.
Norman is not humble.If someone is tart and not massive, then he is compassionate, and vice versa.
If everyone is tart or not entire, then Baird is not right.
Someone is humble and not compassionate if and only if he is not massive and not entire.
If someone is massive and entire, then he is both not compassionate and tart, and vice versa.
Bud being not compassionate is equivalent to Sean being not massive.
It can be concluded that Sean is entire once knowing that Silas is right or Michael is massive.
It can be concluded that Silas is not right and Michael is entire once knowing that Hanna is compassionate.
If someone who is compassionate is also not tart, then he is not right.
Someone being not tart is equivalent to being entire.
If someone who is not tart is also not humble, then he is massive.
If there is someone who is either not massive or not entire, then Norman is humble.
It can be concluded that Silas is not right and Silas is not tart once knowing that Sean is humble. | Silas is not tart. | entailment |
Norman is not massive.
Michael is not humble.
Sean is compassionate.
Michael is not compassionate.
Hanna is compassionate.
Michael is not right.
Silas is not tart.
Michael is tart.
Bud is not entire.
Silas is right.
Hanna is not right.
Norman is not humble.If someone is tart and not massive, then he is compassionate, and vice versa.
If everyone is tart or not entire, then Baird is not right.
Someone is humble and not compassionate if and only if he is not massive and not entire.
If someone is massive and entire, then he is both not compassionate and tart, and vice versa.
Bud being not compassionate is equivalent to Sean being not massive.
It can be concluded that Sean is entire once knowing that Silas is right or Michael is massive.
It can be concluded that Silas is not right and Michael is entire once knowing that Hanna is compassionate.
If someone who is compassionate is also not tart, then he is not right.
Someone being not tart is equivalent to being entire.
If someone who is not tart is also not humble, then he is massive.
If there is someone who is either not massive or not entire, then Norman is humble.
It can be concluded that Silas is not right and Silas is not tart once knowing that Sean is humble. | Norman is tart. | neutral |
Lucy is not busy.
Basil is not naughty.
Leona is naughty.
Leona is not interesting.
Basil is not busy.
Amos is not miniscule.
Basil is hurt.
Leona is busy.
Peter is hurt.
Peter is not naughty.
Bruce is naughty.
Peter is busy.If someone is not crazy, then he is not miniscule, and vice versa.
If Basil is not interesting and Basil is not miniscule, then Peter is not hurt.
If all people are hurt, then Peter is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is not busy, then Amos is crazy.
If someone is not crazy, then he is not interesting.
Someone who is not miniscule is always both interesting and not hurt.
Bruce being not busy implies that Amos is not crazy.
Someone who is not hurt is always both crazy and not busy.
All not hurt people are miniscule.
If there is at least one people who is busy, then Joshua is not miniscule.
If someone is not crazy and busy, then he is both not miniscule and not interesting, and vice versa.
If Peter is not naughty, then Amos is not interesting, and vice versa. | Basil is not naughty. | entailment |
Lucy is not busy.
Basil is not naughty.
Leona is naughty.
Leona is not interesting.
Basil is not busy.
Amos is not miniscule.
Basil is hurt.
Leona is busy.
Peter is hurt.
Peter is not naughty.
Bruce is naughty.
Peter is busy.If someone is not crazy, then he is not miniscule, and vice versa.
If Basil is not interesting and Basil is not miniscule, then Peter is not hurt.
If all people are hurt, then Peter is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is not busy, then Amos is crazy.
If someone is not crazy, then he is not interesting.
Someone who is not miniscule is always both interesting and not hurt.
Bruce being not busy implies that Amos is not crazy.
Someone who is not hurt is always both crazy and not busy.
All not hurt people are miniscule.
If there is at least one people who is busy, then Joshua is not miniscule.
If someone is not crazy and busy, then he is both not miniscule and not interesting, and vice versa.
If Peter is not naughty, then Amos is not interesting, and vice versa. | Joshua is hurt. | contradiction |
Lucy is not busy.
Basil is not naughty.
Leona is naughty.
Leona is not interesting.
Basil is not busy.
Amos is not miniscule.
Basil is hurt.
Leona is busy.
Peter is hurt.
Peter is not naughty.
Bruce is naughty.
Peter is busy.If someone is not crazy, then he is not miniscule, and vice versa.
If Basil is not interesting and Basil is not miniscule, then Peter is not hurt.
If all people are hurt, then Peter is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is not busy, then Amos is crazy.
If someone is not crazy, then he is not interesting.
Someone who is not miniscule is always both interesting and not hurt.
Bruce being not busy implies that Amos is not crazy.
Someone who is not hurt is always both crazy and not busy.
All not hurt people are miniscule.
If there is at least one people who is busy, then Joshua is not miniscule.
If someone is not crazy and busy, then he is both not miniscule and not interesting, and vice versa.
If Peter is not naughty, then Amos is not interesting, and vice versa. | Peter is naughty. | contradiction |
Lucy is not busy.
Basil is not naughty.
Leona is naughty.
Leona is not interesting.
Basil is not busy.
Amos is not miniscule.
Basil is hurt.
Leona is busy.
Peter is hurt.
Peter is not naughty.
Bruce is naughty.
Peter is busy.If someone is not crazy, then he is not miniscule, and vice versa.
If Basil is not interesting and Basil is not miniscule, then Peter is not hurt.
If all people are hurt, then Peter is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is not busy, then Amos is crazy.
If someone is not crazy, then he is not interesting.
Someone who is not miniscule is always both interesting and not hurt.
Bruce being not busy implies that Amos is not crazy.
Someone who is not hurt is always both crazy and not busy.
All not hurt people are miniscule.
If there is at least one people who is busy, then Joshua is not miniscule.
If someone is not crazy and busy, then he is both not miniscule and not interesting, and vice versa.
If Peter is not naughty, then Amos is not interesting, and vice versa. | Bruce is busy. | neutral |
Lucy is not busy.
Basil is not naughty.
Leona is naughty.
Leona is not interesting.
Basil is not busy.
Amos is not miniscule.
Basil is hurt.
Leona is busy.
Peter is hurt.
Peter is not naughty.
Bruce is naughty.
Peter is busy.If someone is not crazy, then he is not miniscule, and vice versa.
If Basil is not interesting and Basil is not miniscule, then Peter is not hurt.
If all people are hurt, then Peter is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is not busy, then Amos is crazy.
If someone is not crazy, then he is not interesting.
Someone who is not miniscule is always both interesting and not hurt.
Bruce being not busy implies that Amos is not crazy.
Someone who is not hurt is always both crazy and not busy.
All not hurt people are miniscule.
If there is at least one people who is busy, then Joshua is not miniscule.
If someone is not crazy and busy, then he is both not miniscule and not interesting, and vice versa.
If Peter is not naughty, then Amos is not interesting, and vice versa. | Amos is not hurt. | entailment |
Lucy is not busy.
Basil is not naughty.
Leona is naughty.
Leona is not interesting.
Basil is not busy.
Amos is not miniscule.
Basil is hurt.
Leona is busy.
Peter is hurt.
Peter is not naughty.
Bruce is naughty.
Peter is busy.If someone is not crazy, then he is not miniscule, and vice versa.
If Basil is not interesting and Basil is not miniscule, then Peter is not hurt.
If all people are hurt, then Peter is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is not busy, then Amos is crazy.
If someone is not crazy, then he is not interesting.
Someone who is not miniscule is always both interesting and not hurt.
Bruce being not busy implies that Amos is not crazy.
Someone who is not hurt is always both crazy and not busy.
All not hurt people are miniscule.
If there is at least one people who is busy, then Joshua is not miniscule.
If someone is not crazy and busy, then he is both not miniscule and not interesting, and vice versa.
If Peter is not naughty, then Amos is not interesting, and vice versa. | Amos is busy. | self_contradiction |
Lucy is not busy.
Basil is not naughty.
Leona is naughty.
Leona is not interesting.
Basil is not busy.
Amos is not miniscule.
Basil is hurt.
Leona is busy.
Peter is hurt.
Peter is not naughty.
Bruce is naughty.
Peter is busy.If someone is not crazy, then he is not miniscule, and vice versa.
If Basil is not interesting and Basil is not miniscule, then Peter is not hurt.
If all people are hurt, then Peter is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is not busy, then Amos is crazy.
If someone is not crazy, then he is not interesting.
Someone who is not miniscule is always both interesting and not hurt.
Bruce being not busy implies that Amos is not crazy.
Someone who is not hurt is always both crazy and not busy.
All not hurt people are miniscule.
If there is at least one people who is busy, then Joshua is not miniscule.
If someone is not crazy and busy, then he is both not miniscule and not interesting, and vice versa.
If Peter is not naughty, then Amos is not interesting, and vice versa. | Amos is naughty. | neutral |
Lucy is not busy.
Basil is not naughty.
Leona is naughty.
Leona is not interesting.
Basil is not busy.
Amos is not miniscule.
Basil is hurt.
Leona is busy.
Peter is hurt.
Peter is not naughty.
Bruce is naughty.
Peter is busy.If someone is not crazy, then he is not miniscule, and vice versa.
If Basil is not interesting and Basil is not miniscule, then Peter is not hurt.
If all people are hurt, then Peter is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is not busy, then Amos is crazy.
If someone is not crazy, then he is not interesting.
Someone who is not miniscule is always both interesting and not hurt.
Bruce being not busy implies that Amos is not crazy.
Someone who is not hurt is always both crazy and not busy.
All not hurt people are miniscule.
If there is at least one people who is busy, then Joshua is not miniscule.
If someone is not crazy and busy, then he is both not miniscule and not interesting, and vice versa.
If Peter is not naughty, then Amos is not interesting, and vice versa. | Leona is not hurt. | neutral |
Lucy is not busy.
Basil is not naughty.
Leona is naughty.
Leona is not interesting.
Basil is not busy.
Amos is not miniscule.
Basil is hurt.
Leona is busy.
Peter is hurt.
Peter is not naughty.
Bruce is naughty.
Peter is busy.If someone is not crazy, then he is not miniscule, and vice versa.
If Basil is not interesting and Basil is not miniscule, then Peter is not hurt.
If all people are hurt, then Peter is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is not busy, then Amos is crazy.
If someone is not crazy, then he is not interesting.
Someone who is not miniscule is always both interesting and not hurt.
Bruce being not busy implies that Amos is not crazy.
Someone who is not hurt is always both crazy and not busy.
All not hurt people are miniscule.
If there is at least one people who is busy, then Joshua is not miniscule.
If someone is not crazy and busy, then he is both not miniscule and not interesting, and vice versa.
If Peter is not naughty, then Amos is not interesting, and vice versa. | Basil is not busy. | entailment |
Lucy is not busy.
Basil is not naughty.
Leona is naughty.
Leona is not interesting.
Basil is not busy.
Amos is not miniscule.
Basil is hurt.
Leona is busy.
Peter is hurt.
Peter is not naughty.
Bruce is naughty.
Peter is busy.If someone is not crazy, then he is not miniscule, and vice versa.
If Basil is not interesting and Basil is not miniscule, then Peter is not hurt.
If all people are hurt, then Peter is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is not busy, then Amos is crazy.
If someone is not crazy, then he is not interesting.
Someone who is not miniscule is always both interesting and not hurt.
Bruce being not busy implies that Amos is not crazy.
Someone who is not hurt is always both crazy and not busy.
All not hurt people are miniscule.
If there is at least one people who is busy, then Joshua is not miniscule.
If someone is not crazy and busy, then he is both not miniscule and not interesting, and vice versa.
If Peter is not naughty, then Amos is not interesting, and vice versa. | Amos is hurt. | contradiction |
Lucy is not busy.
Basil is not naughty.
Leona is naughty.
Leona is not interesting.
Basil is not busy.
Amos is not miniscule.
Basil is hurt.
Leona is busy.
Peter is hurt.
Peter is not naughty.
Bruce is naughty.
Peter is busy.If someone is not crazy, then he is not miniscule, and vice versa.
If Basil is not interesting and Basil is not miniscule, then Peter is not hurt.
If all people are hurt, then Peter is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is not busy, then Amos is crazy.
If someone is not crazy, then he is not interesting.
Someone who is not miniscule is always both interesting and not hurt.
Bruce being not busy implies that Amos is not crazy.
Someone who is not hurt is always both crazy and not busy.
All not hurt people are miniscule.
If there is at least one people who is busy, then Joshua is not miniscule.
If someone is not crazy and busy, then he is both not miniscule and not interesting, and vice versa.
If Peter is not naughty, then Amos is not interesting, and vice versa. | Lucy is busy. | contradiction |
Lucy is not busy.
Basil is not naughty.
Leona is naughty.
Leona is not interesting.
Basil is not busy.
Amos is not miniscule.
Basil is hurt.
Leona is busy.
Peter is hurt.
Peter is not naughty.
Bruce is naughty.
Peter is busy.If someone is not crazy, then he is not miniscule, and vice versa.
If Basil is not interesting and Basil is not miniscule, then Peter is not hurt.
If all people are hurt, then Peter is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is not busy, then Amos is crazy.
If someone is not crazy, then he is not interesting.
Someone who is not miniscule is always both interesting and not hurt.
Bruce being not busy implies that Amos is not crazy.
Someone who is not hurt is always both crazy and not busy.
All not hurt people are miniscule.
If there is at least one people who is busy, then Joshua is not miniscule.
If someone is not crazy and busy, then he is both not miniscule and not interesting, and vice versa.
If Peter is not naughty, then Amos is not interesting, and vice versa. | Joshua is not interesting. | self_contradiction |
Lucy is not busy.
Basil is not naughty.
Leona is naughty.
Leona is not interesting.
Basil is not busy.
Amos is not miniscule.
Basil is hurt.
Leona is busy.
Peter is hurt.
Peter is not naughty.
Bruce is naughty.
Peter is busy.If someone is not crazy, then he is not miniscule, and vice versa.
If Basil is not interesting and Basil is not miniscule, then Peter is not hurt.
If all people are hurt, then Peter is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is not busy, then Amos is crazy.
If someone is not crazy, then he is not interesting.
Someone who is not miniscule is always both interesting and not hurt.
Bruce being not busy implies that Amos is not crazy.
Someone who is not hurt is always both crazy and not busy.
All not hurt people are miniscule.
If there is at least one people who is busy, then Joshua is not miniscule.
If someone is not crazy and busy, then he is both not miniscule and not interesting, and vice versa.
If Peter is not naughty, then Amos is not interesting, and vice versa. | Bruce is miniscule. | neutral |
Lucy is not busy.
Basil is not naughty.
Leona is naughty.
Leona is not interesting.
Basil is not busy.
Amos is not miniscule.
Basil is hurt.
Leona is busy.
Peter is hurt.
Peter is not naughty.
Bruce is naughty.
Peter is busy.If someone is not crazy, then he is not miniscule, and vice versa.
If Basil is not interesting and Basil is not miniscule, then Peter is not hurt.
If all people are hurt, then Peter is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is not busy, then Amos is crazy.
If someone is not crazy, then he is not interesting.
Someone who is not miniscule is always both interesting and not hurt.
Bruce being not busy implies that Amos is not crazy.
Someone who is not hurt is always both crazy and not busy.
All not hurt people are miniscule.
If there is at least one people who is busy, then Joshua is not miniscule.
If someone is not crazy and busy, then he is both not miniscule and not interesting, and vice versa.
If Peter is not naughty, then Amos is not interesting, and vice versa. | Basil is not hurt. | contradiction |
Lucy is not busy.
Basil is not naughty.
Leona is naughty.
Leona is not interesting.
Basil is not busy.
Amos is not miniscule.
Basil is hurt.
Leona is busy.
Peter is hurt.
Peter is not naughty.
Bruce is naughty.
Peter is busy.If someone is not crazy, then he is not miniscule, and vice versa.
If Basil is not interesting and Basil is not miniscule, then Peter is not hurt.
If all people are hurt, then Peter is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is not busy, then Amos is crazy.
If someone is not crazy, then he is not interesting.
Someone who is not miniscule is always both interesting and not hurt.
Bruce being not busy implies that Amos is not crazy.
Someone who is not hurt is always both crazy and not busy.
All not hurt people are miniscule.
If there is at least one people who is busy, then Joshua is not miniscule.
If someone is not crazy and busy, then he is both not miniscule and not interesting, and vice versa.
If Peter is not naughty, then Amos is not interesting, and vice versa. | Joshua is miniscule. | self_contradiction |
Lucy is not busy.
Basil is not naughty.
Leona is naughty.
Leona is not interesting.
Basil is not busy.
Amos is not miniscule.
Basil is hurt.
Leona is busy.
Peter is hurt.
Peter is not naughty.
Bruce is naughty.
Peter is busy.If someone is not crazy, then he is not miniscule, and vice versa.
If Basil is not interesting and Basil is not miniscule, then Peter is not hurt.
If all people are hurt, then Peter is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is not busy, then Amos is crazy.
If someone is not crazy, then he is not interesting.
Someone who is not miniscule is always both interesting and not hurt.
Bruce being not busy implies that Amos is not crazy.
Someone who is not hurt is always both crazy and not busy.
All not hurt people are miniscule.
If there is at least one people who is busy, then Joshua is not miniscule.
If someone is not crazy and busy, then he is both not miniscule and not interesting, and vice versa.
If Peter is not naughty, then Amos is not interesting, and vice versa. | Basil is hurt. | entailment |
Lucy is not busy.
Basil is not naughty.
Leona is naughty.
Leona is not interesting.
Basil is not busy.
Amos is not miniscule.
Basil is hurt.
Leona is busy.
Peter is hurt.
Peter is not naughty.
Bruce is naughty.
Peter is busy.If someone is not crazy, then he is not miniscule, and vice versa.
If Basil is not interesting and Basil is not miniscule, then Peter is not hurt.
If all people are hurt, then Peter is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is not busy, then Amos is crazy.
If someone is not crazy, then he is not interesting.
Someone who is not miniscule is always both interesting and not hurt.
Bruce being not busy implies that Amos is not crazy.
Someone who is not hurt is always both crazy and not busy.
All not hurt people are miniscule.
If there is at least one people who is busy, then Joshua is not miniscule.
If someone is not crazy and busy, then he is both not miniscule and not interesting, and vice versa.
If Peter is not naughty, then Amos is not interesting, and vice versa. | Leona is hurt. | neutral |
Lucy is not busy.
Basil is not naughty.
Leona is naughty.
Leona is not interesting.
Basil is not busy.
Amos is not miniscule.
Basil is hurt.
Leona is busy.
Peter is hurt.
Peter is not naughty.
Bruce is naughty.
Peter is busy.If someone is not crazy, then he is not miniscule, and vice versa.
If Basil is not interesting and Basil is not miniscule, then Peter is not hurt.
If all people are hurt, then Peter is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is not busy, then Amos is crazy.
If someone is not crazy, then he is not interesting.
Someone who is not miniscule is always both interesting and not hurt.
Bruce being not busy implies that Amos is not crazy.
Someone who is not hurt is always both crazy and not busy.
All not hurt people are miniscule.
If there is at least one people who is busy, then Joshua is not miniscule.
If someone is not crazy and busy, then he is both not miniscule and not interesting, and vice versa.
If Peter is not naughty, then Amos is not interesting, and vice versa. | Leona is naughty. | entailment |
Lucy is not busy.
Basil is not naughty.
Leona is naughty.
Leona is not interesting.
Basil is not busy.
Amos is not miniscule.
Basil is hurt.
Leona is busy.
Peter is hurt.
Peter is not naughty.
Bruce is naughty.
Peter is busy.If someone is not crazy, then he is not miniscule, and vice versa.
If Basil is not interesting and Basil is not miniscule, then Peter is not hurt.
If all people are hurt, then Peter is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is not busy, then Amos is crazy.
If someone is not crazy, then he is not interesting.
Someone who is not miniscule is always both interesting and not hurt.
Bruce being not busy implies that Amos is not crazy.
Someone who is not hurt is always both crazy and not busy.
All not hurt people are miniscule.
If there is at least one people who is busy, then Joshua is not miniscule.
If someone is not crazy and busy, then he is both not miniscule and not interesting, and vice versa.
If Peter is not naughty, then Amos is not interesting, and vice versa. | Joshua is not miniscule. | self_contradiction |
Lucy is not busy.
Basil is not naughty.
Leona is naughty.
Leona is not interesting.
Basil is not busy.
Amos is not miniscule.
Basil is hurt.
Leona is busy.
Peter is hurt.
Peter is not naughty.
Bruce is naughty.
Peter is busy.If someone is not crazy, then he is not miniscule, and vice versa.
If Basil is not interesting and Basil is not miniscule, then Peter is not hurt.
If all people are hurt, then Peter is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is not busy, then Amos is crazy.
If someone is not crazy, then he is not interesting.
Someone who is not miniscule is always both interesting and not hurt.
Bruce being not busy implies that Amos is not crazy.
Someone who is not hurt is always both crazy and not busy.
All not hurt people are miniscule.
If there is at least one people who is busy, then Joshua is not miniscule.
If someone is not crazy and busy, then he is both not miniscule and not interesting, and vice versa.
If Peter is not naughty, then Amos is not interesting, and vice versa. | Amos is not interesting. | self_contradiction |
Deborah is not tame.
Deborah is not wooden.
Hunter is not tame.
Sherard is not better.
Leonard is wooden.
Ryan is not reliable.
Quimby is not romantic.
Ryan is not better.
Quimby is reliable.
Sherard is not romantic.
Hunter is not better.
Kendall is not tame.Hunter being not reliable and Deborah being wooden imply that Leonard is romantic.
If there is someone who is better, then Ryan is sad and Ryan is not reliable.
As long as someone is not wooden, he is sad and better.
Sherard being not reliable and Kendall being romantic imply that Leonard is not wooden.
If someone is sad, then he is not better.
All not romantic people are not tame.
If someone is not sad or he is wooden, then he is not reliable.
If someone is wooden, then he is both not better and not romantic.
If there is someone who is wooden, then Deborah is reliable.
If there is at least one people who is better, then Sherard is tame and Hunter is not reliable.
If someone who is not romantic is also not reliable, then he is not sad.
If someone is not tame and not better, then he is both sad and romantic, and vice versa. | Sherard is sad. | entailment |
Deborah is not tame.
Deborah is not wooden.
Hunter is not tame.
Sherard is not better.
Leonard is wooden.
Ryan is not reliable.
Quimby is not romantic.
Ryan is not better.
Quimby is reliable.
Sherard is not romantic.
Hunter is not better.
Kendall is not tame.Hunter being not reliable and Deborah being wooden imply that Leonard is romantic.
If there is someone who is better, then Ryan is sad and Ryan is not reliable.
As long as someone is not wooden, he is sad and better.
Sherard being not reliable and Kendall being romantic imply that Leonard is not wooden.
If someone is sad, then he is not better.
All not romantic people are not tame.
If someone is not sad or he is wooden, then he is not reliable.
If someone is wooden, then he is both not better and not romantic.
If there is someone who is wooden, then Deborah is reliable.
If there is at least one people who is better, then Sherard is tame and Hunter is not reliable.
If someone who is not romantic is also not reliable, then he is not sad.
If someone is not tame and not better, then he is both sad and romantic, and vice versa. | Sherard is not reliable. | neutral |
Deborah is not tame.
Deborah is not wooden.
Hunter is not tame.
Sherard is not better.
Leonard is wooden.
Ryan is not reliable.
Quimby is not romantic.
Ryan is not better.
Quimby is reliable.
Sherard is not romantic.
Hunter is not better.
Kendall is not tame.Hunter being not reliable and Deborah being wooden imply that Leonard is romantic.
If there is someone who is better, then Ryan is sad and Ryan is not reliable.
As long as someone is not wooden, he is sad and better.
Sherard being not reliable and Kendall being romantic imply that Leonard is not wooden.
If someone is sad, then he is not better.
All not romantic people are not tame.
If someone is not sad or he is wooden, then he is not reliable.
If someone is wooden, then he is both not better and not romantic.
If there is someone who is wooden, then Deborah is reliable.
If there is at least one people who is better, then Sherard is tame and Hunter is not reliable.
If someone who is not romantic is also not reliable, then he is not sad.
If someone is not tame and not better, then he is both sad and romantic, and vice versa. | Leonard is not wooden. | contradiction |
Deborah is not tame.
Deborah is not wooden.
Hunter is not tame.
Sherard is not better.
Leonard is wooden.
Ryan is not reliable.
Quimby is not romantic.
Ryan is not better.
Quimby is reliable.
Sherard is not romantic.
Hunter is not better.
Kendall is not tame.Hunter being not reliable and Deborah being wooden imply that Leonard is romantic.
If there is someone who is better, then Ryan is sad and Ryan is not reliable.
As long as someone is not wooden, he is sad and better.
Sherard being not reliable and Kendall being romantic imply that Leonard is not wooden.
If someone is sad, then he is not better.
All not romantic people are not tame.
If someone is not sad or he is wooden, then he is not reliable.
If someone is wooden, then he is both not better and not romantic.
If there is someone who is wooden, then Deborah is reliable.
If there is at least one people who is better, then Sherard is tame and Hunter is not reliable.
If someone who is not romantic is also not reliable, then he is not sad.
If someone is not tame and not better, then he is both sad and romantic, and vice versa. | Sherard is tame. | self_contradiction |
Deborah is not tame.
Deborah is not wooden.
Hunter is not tame.
Sherard is not better.
Leonard is wooden.
Ryan is not reliable.
Quimby is not romantic.
Ryan is not better.
Quimby is reliable.
Sherard is not romantic.
Hunter is not better.
Kendall is not tame.Hunter being not reliable and Deborah being wooden imply that Leonard is romantic.
If there is someone who is better, then Ryan is sad and Ryan is not reliable.
As long as someone is not wooden, he is sad and better.
Sherard being not reliable and Kendall being romantic imply that Leonard is not wooden.
If someone is sad, then he is not better.
All not romantic people are not tame.
If someone is not sad or he is wooden, then he is not reliable.
If someone is wooden, then he is both not better and not romantic.
If there is someone who is wooden, then Deborah is reliable.
If there is at least one people who is better, then Sherard is tame and Hunter is not reliable.
If someone who is not romantic is also not reliable, then he is not sad.
If someone is not tame and not better, then he is both sad and romantic, and vice versa. | Ryan is not tame. | neutral |
Deborah is not tame.
Deborah is not wooden.
Hunter is not tame.
Sherard is not better.
Leonard is wooden.
Ryan is not reliable.
Quimby is not romantic.
Ryan is not better.
Quimby is reliable.
Sherard is not romantic.
Hunter is not better.
Kendall is not tame.Hunter being not reliable and Deborah being wooden imply that Leonard is romantic.
If there is someone who is better, then Ryan is sad and Ryan is not reliable.
As long as someone is not wooden, he is sad and better.
Sherard being not reliable and Kendall being romantic imply that Leonard is not wooden.
If someone is sad, then he is not better.
All not romantic people are not tame.
If someone is not sad or he is wooden, then he is not reliable.
If someone is wooden, then he is both not better and not romantic.
If there is someone who is wooden, then Deborah is reliable.
If there is at least one people who is better, then Sherard is tame and Hunter is not reliable.
If someone who is not romantic is also not reliable, then he is not sad.
If someone is not tame and not better, then he is both sad and romantic, and vice versa. | Deborah is wooden. | contradiction |
Deborah is not tame.
Deborah is not wooden.
Hunter is not tame.
Sherard is not better.
Leonard is wooden.
Ryan is not reliable.
Quimby is not romantic.
Ryan is not better.
Quimby is reliable.
Sherard is not romantic.
Hunter is not better.
Kendall is not tame.Hunter being not reliable and Deborah being wooden imply that Leonard is romantic.
If there is someone who is better, then Ryan is sad and Ryan is not reliable.
As long as someone is not wooden, he is sad and better.
Sherard being not reliable and Kendall being romantic imply that Leonard is not wooden.
If someone is sad, then he is not better.
All not romantic people are not tame.
If someone is not sad or he is wooden, then he is not reliable.
If someone is wooden, then he is both not better and not romantic.
If there is someone who is wooden, then Deborah is reliable.
If there is at least one people who is better, then Sherard is tame and Hunter is not reliable.
If someone who is not romantic is also not reliable, then he is not sad.
If someone is not tame and not better, then he is both sad and romantic, and vice versa. | Leonard is not sad. | self_contradiction |
Deborah is not tame.
Deborah is not wooden.
Hunter is not tame.
Sherard is not better.
Leonard is wooden.
Ryan is not reliable.
Quimby is not romantic.
Ryan is not better.
Quimby is reliable.
Sherard is not romantic.
Hunter is not better.
Kendall is not tame.Hunter being not reliable and Deborah being wooden imply that Leonard is romantic.
If there is someone who is better, then Ryan is sad and Ryan is not reliable.
As long as someone is not wooden, he is sad and better.
Sherard being not reliable and Kendall being romantic imply that Leonard is not wooden.
If someone is sad, then he is not better.
All not romantic people are not tame.
If someone is not sad or he is wooden, then he is not reliable.
If someone is wooden, then he is both not better and not romantic.
If there is someone who is wooden, then Deborah is reliable.
If there is at least one people who is better, then Sherard is tame and Hunter is not reliable.
If someone who is not romantic is also not reliable, then he is not sad.
If someone is not tame and not better, then he is both sad and romantic, and vice versa. | Sherard is not wooden. | neutral |
Deborah is not tame.
Deborah is not wooden.
Hunter is not tame.
Sherard is not better.
Leonard is wooden.
Ryan is not reliable.
Quimby is not romantic.
Ryan is not better.
Quimby is reliable.
Sherard is not romantic.
Hunter is not better.
Kendall is not tame.Hunter being not reliable and Deborah being wooden imply that Leonard is romantic.
If there is someone who is better, then Ryan is sad and Ryan is not reliable.
As long as someone is not wooden, he is sad and better.
Sherard being not reliable and Kendall being romantic imply that Leonard is not wooden.
If someone is sad, then he is not better.
All not romantic people are not tame.
If someone is not sad or he is wooden, then he is not reliable.
If someone is wooden, then he is both not better and not romantic.
If there is someone who is wooden, then Deborah is reliable.
If there is at least one people who is better, then Sherard is tame and Hunter is not reliable.
If someone who is not romantic is also not reliable, then he is not sad.
If someone is not tame and not better, then he is both sad and romantic, and vice versa. | Ryan is not reliable. | entailment |
Deborah is not tame.
Deborah is not wooden.
Hunter is not tame.
Sherard is not better.
Leonard is wooden.
Ryan is not reliable.
Quimby is not romantic.
Ryan is not better.
Quimby is reliable.
Sherard is not romantic.
Hunter is not better.
Kendall is not tame.Hunter being not reliable and Deborah being wooden imply that Leonard is romantic.
If there is someone who is better, then Ryan is sad and Ryan is not reliable.
As long as someone is not wooden, he is sad and better.
Sherard being not reliable and Kendall being romantic imply that Leonard is not wooden.
If someone is sad, then he is not better.
All not romantic people are not tame.
If someone is not sad or he is wooden, then he is not reliable.
If someone is wooden, then he is both not better and not romantic.
If there is someone who is wooden, then Deborah is reliable.
If there is at least one people who is better, then Sherard is tame and Hunter is not reliable.
If someone who is not romantic is also not reliable, then he is not sad.
If someone is not tame and not better, then he is both sad and romantic, and vice versa. | Leonard is reliable. | contradiction |
Deborah is not tame.
Deborah is not wooden.
Hunter is not tame.
Sherard is not better.
Leonard is wooden.
Ryan is not reliable.
Quimby is not romantic.
Ryan is not better.
Quimby is reliable.
Sherard is not romantic.
Hunter is not better.
Kendall is not tame.Hunter being not reliable and Deborah being wooden imply that Leonard is romantic.
If there is someone who is better, then Ryan is sad and Ryan is not reliable.
As long as someone is not wooden, he is sad and better.
Sherard being not reliable and Kendall being romantic imply that Leonard is not wooden.
If someone is sad, then he is not better.
All not romantic people are not tame.
If someone is not sad or he is wooden, then he is not reliable.
If someone is wooden, then he is both not better and not romantic.
If there is someone who is wooden, then Deborah is reliable.
If there is at least one people who is better, then Sherard is tame and Hunter is not reliable.
If someone who is not romantic is also not reliable, then he is not sad.
If someone is not tame and not better, then he is both sad and romantic, and vice versa. | Hunter is not better. | entailment |
Deborah is not tame.
Deborah is not wooden.
Hunter is not tame.
Sherard is not better.
Leonard is wooden.
Ryan is not reliable.
Quimby is not romantic.
Ryan is not better.
Quimby is reliable.
Sherard is not romantic.
Hunter is not better.
Kendall is not tame.Hunter being not reliable and Deborah being wooden imply that Leonard is romantic.
If there is someone who is better, then Ryan is sad and Ryan is not reliable.
As long as someone is not wooden, he is sad and better.
Sherard being not reliable and Kendall being romantic imply that Leonard is not wooden.
If someone is sad, then he is not better.
All not romantic people are not tame.
If someone is not sad or he is wooden, then he is not reliable.
If someone is wooden, then he is both not better and not romantic.
If there is someone who is wooden, then Deborah is reliable.
If there is at least one people who is better, then Sherard is tame and Hunter is not reliable.
If someone who is not romantic is also not reliable, then he is not sad.
If someone is not tame and not better, then he is both sad and romantic, and vice versa. | Sherard is not tame. | self_contradiction |
Deborah is not tame.
Deborah is not wooden.
Hunter is not tame.
Sherard is not better.
Leonard is wooden.
Ryan is not reliable.
Quimby is not romantic.
Ryan is not better.
Quimby is reliable.
Sherard is not romantic.
Hunter is not better.
Kendall is not tame.Hunter being not reliable and Deborah being wooden imply that Leonard is romantic.
If there is someone who is better, then Ryan is sad and Ryan is not reliable.
As long as someone is not wooden, he is sad and better.
Sherard being not reliable and Kendall being romantic imply that Leonard is not wooden.
If someone is sad, then he is not better.
All not romantic people are not tame.
If someone is not sad or he is wooden, then he is not reliable.
If someone is wooden, then he is both not better and not romantic.
If there is someone who is wooden, then Deborah is reliable.
If there is at least one people who is better, then Sherard is tame and Hunter is not reliable.
If someone who is not romantic is also not reliable, then he is not sad.
If someone is not tame and not better, then he is both sad and romantic, and vice versa. | Kendall is wooden. | neutral |
Deborah is not tame.
Deborah is not wooden.
Hunter is not tame.
Sherard is not better.
Leonard is wooden.
Ryan is not reliable.
Quimby is not romantic.
Ryan is not better.
Quimby is reliable.
Sherard is not romantic.
Hunter is not better.
Kendall is not tame.Hunter being not reliable and Deborah being wooden imply that Leonard is romantic.
If there is someone who is better, then Ryan is sad and Ryan is not reliable.
As long as someone is not wooden, he is sad and better.
Sherard being not reliable and Kendall being romantic imply that Leonard is not wooden.
If someone is sad, then he is not better.
All not romantic people are not tame.
If someone is not sad or he is wooden, then he is not reliable.
If someone is wooden, then he is both not better and not romantic.
If there is someone who is wooden, then Deborah is reliable.
If there is at least one people who is better, then Sherard is tame and Hunter is not reliable.
If someone who is not romantic is also not reliable, then he is not sad.
If someone is not tame and not better, then he is both sad and romantic, and vice versa. | Leonard is romantic. | self_contradiction |
Deborah is not tame.
Deborah is not wooden.
Hunter is not tame.
Sherard is not better.
Leonard is wooden.
Ryan is not reliable.
Quimby is not romantic.
Ryan is not better.
Quimby is reliable.
Sherard is not romantic.
Hunter is not better.
Kendall is not tame.Hunter being not reliable and Deborah being wooden imply that Leonard is romantic.
If there is someone who is better, then Ryan is sad and Ryan is not reliable.
As long as someone is not wooden, he is sad and better.
Sherard being not reliable and Kendall being romantic imply that Leonard is not wooden.
If someone is sad, then he is not better.
All not romantic people are not tame.
If someone is not sad or he is wooden, then he is not reliable.
If someone is wooden, then he is both not better and not romantic.
If there is someone who is wooden, then Deborah is reliable.
If there is at least one people who is better, then Sherard is tame and Hunter is not reliable.
If someone who is not romantic is also not reliable, then he is not sad.
If someone is not tame and not better, then he is both sad and romantic, and vice versa. | Quimby is not tame. | entailment |
Deborah is not tame.
Deborah is not wooden.
Hunter is not tame.
Sherard is not better.
Leonard is wooden.
Ryan is not reliable.
Quimby is not romantic.
Ryan is not better.
Quimby is reliable.
Sherard is not romantic.
Hunter is not better.
Kendall is not tame.Hunter being not reliable and Deborah being wooden imply that Leonard is romantic.
If there is someone who is better, then Ryan is sad and Ryan is not reliable.
As long as someone is not wooden, he is sad and better.
Sherard being not reliable and Kendall being romantic imply that Leonard is not wooden.
If someone is sad, then he is not better.
All not romantic people are not tame.
If someone is not sad or he is wooden, then he is not reliable.
If someone is wooden, then he is both not better and not romantic.
If there is someone who is wooden, then Deborah is reliable.
If there is at least one people who is better, then Sherard is tame and Hunter is not reliable.
If someone who is not romantic is also not reliable, then he is not sad.
If someone is not tame and not better, then he is both sad and romantic, and vice versa. | Ryan is romantic. | neutral |
Deborah is not tame.
Deborah is not wooden.
Hunter is not tame.
Sherard is not better.
Leonard is wooden.
Ryan is not reliable.
Quimby is not romantic.
Ryan is not better.
Quimby is reliable.
Sherard is not romantic.
Hunter is not better.
Kendall is not tame.Hunter being not reliable and Deborah being wooden imply that Leonard is romantic.
If there is someone who is better, then Ryan is sad and Ryan is not reliable.
As long as someone is not wooden, he is sad and better.
Sherard being not reliable and Kendall being romantic imply that Leonard is not wooden.
If someone is sad, then he is not better.
All not romantic people are not tame.
If someone is not sad or he is wooden, then he is not reliable.
If someone is wooden, then he is both not better and not romantic.
If there is someone who is wooden, then Deborah is reliable.
If there is at least one people who is better, then Sherard is tame and Hunter is not reliable.
If someone who is not romantic is also not reliable, then he is not sad.
If someone is not tame and not better, then he is both sad and romantic, and vice versa. | Sherard is better. | contradiction |
Deborah is not tame.
Deborah is not wooden.
Hunter is not tame.
Sherard is not better.
Leonard is wooden.
Ryan is not reliable.
Quimby is not romantic.
Ryan is not better.
Quimby is reliable.
Sherard is not romantic.
Hunter is not better.
Kendall is not tame.Hunter being not reliable and Deborah being wooden imply that Leonard is romantic.
If there is someone who is better, then Ryan is sad and Ryan is not reliable.
As long as someone is not wooden, he is sad and better.
Sherard being not reliable and Kendall being romantic imply that Leonard is not wooden.
If someone is sad, then he is not better.
All not romantic people are not tame.
If someone is not sad or he is wooden, then he is not reliable.
If someone is wooden, then he is both not better and not romantic.
If there is someone who is wooden, then Deborah is reliable.
If there is at least one people who is better, then Sherard is tame and Hunter is not reliable.
If someone who is not romantic is also not reliable, then he is not sad.
If someone is not tame and not better, then he is both sad and romantic, and vice versa. | Kendall is tame. | contradiction |
Deborah is not tame.
Deborah is not wooden.
Hunter is not tame.
Sherard is not better.
Leonard is wooden.
Ryan is not reliable.
Quimby is not romantic.
Ryan is not better.
Quimby is reliable.
Sherard is not romantic.
Hunter is not better.
Kendall is not tame.Hunter being not reliable and Deborah being wooden imply that Leonard is romantic.
If there is someone who is better, then Ryan is sad and Ryan is not reliable.
As long as someone is not wooden, he is sad and better.
Sherard being not reliable and Kendall being romantic imply that Leonard is not wooden.
If someone is sad, then he is not better.
All not romantic people are not tame.
If someone is not sad or he is wooden, then he is not reliable.
If someone is wooden, then he is both not better and not romantic.
If there is someone who is wooden, then Deborah is reliable.
If there is at least one people who is better, then Sherard is tame and Hunter is not reliable.
If someone who is not romantic is also not reliable, then he is not sad.
If someone is not tame and not better, then he is both sad and romantic, and vice versa. | Hunter is not tame. | entailment |
Deborah is not tame.
Deborah is not wooden.
Hunter is not tame.
Sherard is not better.
Leonard is wooden.
Ryan is not reliable.
Quimby is not romantic.
Ryan is not better.
Quimby is reliable.
Sherard is not romantic.
Hunter is not better.
Kendall is not tame.Hunter being not reliable and Deborah being wooden imply that Leonard is romantic.
If there is someone who is better, then Ryan is sad and Ryan is not reliable.
As long as someone is not wooden, he is sad and better.
Sherard being not reliable and Kendall being romantic imply that Leonard is not wooden.
If someone is sad, then he is not better.
All not romantic people are not tame.
If someone is not sad or he is wooden, then he is not reliable.
If someone is wooden, then he is both not better and not romantic.
If there is someone who is wooden, then Deborah is reliable.
If there is at least one people who is better, then Sherard is tame and Hunter is not reliable.
If someone who is not romantic is also not reliable, then he is not sad.
If someone is not tame and not better, then he is both sad and romantic, and vice versa. | Sherard is romantic. | self_contradiction |
Norman is not embarrassed.
Hector is not determined.
Norman is unable.
Stuart is not embarrassed.
Stuart is not tan.
Hunter is not tan.
Hector is embarrassed.
Philbert is unable.
Hunter is embarrassed.
Gabriel is determined.
Norman is tan.
Norman is not tired.If there is at least one people who is both embarrassed and not tan, then Gabriel is not better.
If Norman is not determined or Philbert is better, then Anthony is not embarrassed.
If someone is not tired or not tan, then he is not unable.
Stuart being tired and Stuart being not embarrassed imply that Hunter is unable.
If someone is both not tired and unable, then he is not better.
If there is nobody who is not not embarrassed, then Stuart is tan.
Anthony is tan if and only if Hunter is not unable.
Someone being both better and not unable is equivalent to being not determined and tired.
If someone is tan, then he is tired.
If there is someone who is either not embarrassed or better, then Norman is not determined.
If Hunter is tan, then Anthony is not tired and Anthony is embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Anthony is not tired and Hector is not unable once knowing that Hector is better. | Norman is not tired. | self_contradiction |
Norman is not embarrassed.
Hector is not determined.
Norman is unable.
Stuart is not embarrassed.
Stuart is not tan.
Hunter is not tan.
Hector is embarrassed.
Philbert is unable.
Hunter is embarrassed.
Gabriel is determined.
Norman is tan.
Norman is not tired.If there is at least one people who is both embarrassed and not tan, then Gabriel is not better.
If Norman is not determined or Philbert is better, then Anthony is not embarrassed.
If someone is not tired or not tan, then he is not unable.
Stuart being tired and Stuart being not embarrassed imply that Hunter is unable.
If someone is both not tired and unable, then he is not better.
If there is nobody who is not not embarrassed, then Stuart is tan.
Anthony is tan if and only if Hunter is not unable.
Someone being both better and not unable is equivalent to being not determined and tired.
If someone is tan, then he is tired.
If there is someone who is either not embarrassed or better, then Norman is not determined.
If Hunter is tan, then Anthony is not tired and Anthony is embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Anthony is not tired and Hector is not unable once knowing that Hector is better. | Philbert is not determined. | neutral |
Norman is not embarrassed.
Hector is not determined.
Norman is unable.
Stuart is not embarrassed.
Stuart is not tan.
Hunter is not tan.
Hector is embarrassed.
Philbert is unable.
Hunter is embarrassed.
Gabriel is determined.
Norman is tan.
Norman is not tired.If there is at least one people who is both embarrassed and not tan, then Gabriel is not better.
If Norman is not determined or Philbert is better, then Anthony is not embarrassed.
If someone is not tired or not tan, then he is not unable.
Stuart being tired and Stuart being not embarrassed imply that Hunter is unable.
If someone is both not tired and unable, then he is not better.
If there is nobody who is not not embarrassed, then Stuart is tan.
Anthony is tan if and only if Hunter is not unable.
Someone being both better and not unable is equivalent to being not determined and tired.
If someone is tan, then he is tired.
If there is someone who is either not embarrassed or better, then Norman is not determined.
If Hunter is tan, then Anthony is not tired and Anthony is embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Anthony is not tired and Hector is not unable once knowing that Hector is better. | Gabriel is unable. | neutral |
Norman is not embarrassed.
Hector is not determined.
Norman is unable.
Stuart is not embarrassed.
Stuart is not tan.
Hunter is not tan.
Hector is embarrassed.
Philbert is unable.
Hunter is embarrassed.
Gabriel is determined.
Norman is tan.
Norman is not tired.If there is at least one people who is both embarrassed and not tan, then Gabriel is not better.
If Norman is not determined or Philbert is better, then Anthony is not embarrassed.
If someone is not tired or not tan, then he is not unable.
Stuart being tired and Stuart being not embarrassed imply that Hunter is unable.
If someone is both not tired and unable, then he is not better.
If there is nobody who is not not embarrassed, then Stuart is tan.
Anthony is tan if and only if Hunter is not unable.
Someone being both better and not unable is equivalent to being not determined and tired.
If someone is tan, then he is tired.
If there is someone who is either not embarrassed or better, then Norman is not determined.
If Hunter is tan, then Anthony is not tired and Anthony is embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Anthony is not tired and Hector is not unable once knowing that Hector is better. | Norman is not better. | self_contradiction |
Norman is not embarrassed.
Hector is not determined.
Norman is unable.
Stuart is not embarrassed.
Stuart is not tan.
Hunter is not tan.
Hector is embarrassed.
Philbert is unable.
Hunter is embarrassed.
Gabriel is determined.
Norman is tan.
Norman is not tired.If there is at least one people who is both embarrassed and not tan, then Gabriel is not better.
If Norman is not determined or Philbert is better, then Anthony is not embarrassed.
If someone is not tired or not tan, then he is not unable.
Stuart being tired and Stuart being not embarrassed imply that Hunter is unable.
If someone is both not tired and unable, then he is not better.
If there is nobody who is not not embarrassed, then Stuart is tan.
Anthony is tan if and only if Hunter is not unable.
Someone being both better and not unable is equivalent to being not determined and tired.
If someone is tan, then he is tired.
If there is someone who is either not embarrassed or better, then Norman is not determined.
If Hunter is tan, then Anthony is not tired and Anthony is embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Anthony is not tired and Hector is not unable once knowing that Hector is better. | Norman is better. | self_contradiction |
Norman is not embarrassed.
Hector is not determined.
Norman is unable.
Stuart is not embarrassed.
Stuart is not tan.
Hunter is not tan.
Hector is embarrassed.
Philbert is unable.
Hunter is embarrassed.
Gabriel is determined.
Norman is tan.
Norman is not tired.If there is at least one people who is both embarrassed and not tan, then Gabriel is not better.
If Norman is not determined or Philbert is better, then Anthony is not embarrassed.
If someone is not tired or not tan, then he is not unable.
Stuart being tired and Stuart being not embarrassed imply that Hunter is unable.
If someone is both not tired and unable, then he is not better.
If there is nobody who is not not embarrassed, then Stuart is tan.
Anthony is tan if and only if Hunter is not unable.
Someone being both better and not unable is equivalent to being not determined and tired.
If someone is tan, then he is tired.
If there is someone who is either not embarrassed or better, then Norman is not determined.
If Hunter is tan, then Anthony is not tired and Anthony is embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Anthony is not tired and Hector is not unable once knowing that Hector is better. | Hector is not tan. | neutral |
Norman is not embarrassed.
Hector is not determined.
Norman is unable.
Stuart is not embarrassed.
Stuart is not tan.
Hunter is not tan.
Hector is embarrassed.
Philbert is unable.
Hunter is embarrassed.
Gabriel is determined.
Norman is tan.
Norman is not tired.If there is at least one people who is both embarrassed and not tan, then Gabriel is not better.
If Norman is not determined or Philbert is better, then Anthony is not embarrassed.
If someone is not tired or not tan, then he is not unable.
Stuart being tired and Stuart being not embarrassed imply that Hunter is unable.
If someone is both not tired and unable, then he is not better.
If there is nobody who is not not embarrassed, then Stuart is tan.
Anthony is tan if and only if Hunter is not unable.
Someone being both better and not unable is equivalent to being not determined and tired.
If someone is tan, then he is tired.
If there is someone who is either not embarrassed or better, then Norman is not determined.
If Hunter is tan, then Anthony is not tired and Anthony is embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Anthony is not tired and Hector is not unable once knowing that Hector is better. | Hunter is embarrassed. | entailment |
Norman is not embarrassed.
Hector is not determined.
Norman is unable.
Stuart is not embarrassed.
Stuart is not tan.
Hunter is not tan.
Hector is embarrassed.
Philbert is unable.
Hunter is embarrassed.
Gabriel is determined.
Norman is tan.
Norman is not tired.If there is at least one people who is both embarrassed and not tan, then Gabriel is not better.
If Norman is not determined or Philbert is better, then Anthony is not embarrassed.
If someone is not tired or not tan, then he is not unable.
Stuart being tired and Stuart being not embarrassed imply that Hunter is unable.
If someone is both not tired and unable, then he is not better.
If there is nobody who is not not embarrassed, then Stuart is tan.
Anthony is tan if and only if Hunter is not unable.
Someone being both better and not unable is equivalent to being not determined and tired.
If someone is tan, then he is tired.
If there is someone who is either not embarrassed or better, then Norman is not determined.
If Hunter is tan, then Anthony is not tired and Anthony is embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Anthony is not tired and Hector is not unable once knowing that Hector is better. | Stuart is not embarrassed. | entailment |
Norman is not embarrassed.
Hector is not determined.
Norman is unable.
Stuart is not embarrassed.
Stuart is not tan.
Hunter is not tan.
Hector is embarrassed.
Philbert is unable.
Hunter is embarrassed.
Gabriel is determined.
Norman is tan.
Norman is not tired.If there is at least one people who is both embarrassed and not tan, then Gabriel is not better.
If Norman is not determined or Philbert is better, then Anthony is not embarrassed.
If someone is not tired or not tan, then he is not unable.
Stuart being tired and Stuart being not embarrassed imply that Hunter is unable.
If someone is both not tired and unable, then he is not better.
If there is nobody who is not not embarrassed, then Stuart is tan.
Anthony is tan if and only if Hunter is not unable.
Someone being both better and not unable is equivalent to being not determined and tired.
If someone is tan, then he is tired.
If there is someone who is either not embarrassed or better, then Norman is not determined.
If Hunter is tan, then Anthony is not tired and Anthony is embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Anthony is not tired and Hector is not unable once knowing that Hector is better. | Norman is not unable. | self_contradiction |
Norman is not embarrassed.
Hector is not determined.
Norman is unable.
Stuart is not embarrassed.
Stuart is not tan.
Hunter is not tan.
Hector is embarrassed.
Philbert is unable.
Hunter is embarrassed.
Gabriel is determined.
Norman is tan.
Norman is not tired.If there is at least one people who is both embarrassed and not tan, then Gabriel is not better.
If Norman is not determined or Philbert is better, then Anthony is not embarrassed.
If someone is not tired or not tan, then he is not unable.
Stuart being tired and Stuart being not embarrassed imply that Hunter is unable.
If someone is both not tired and unable, then he is not better.
If there is nobody who is not not embarrassed, then Stuart is tan.
Anthony is tan if and only if Hunter is not unable.
Someone being both better and not unable is equivalent to being not determined and tired.
If someone is tan, then he is tired.
If there is someone who is either not embarrassed or better, then Norman is not determined.
If Hunter is tan, then Anthony is not tired and Anthony is embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Anthony is not tired and Hector is not unable once knowing that Hector is better. | Philbert is unable. | entailment |
Norman is not embarrassed.
Hector is not determined.
Norman is unable.
Stuart is not embarrassed.
Stuart is not tan.
Hunter is not tan.
Hector is embarrassed.
Philbert is unable.
Hunter is embarrassed.
Gabriel is determined.
Norman is tan.
Norman is not tired.If there is at least one people who is both embarrassed and not tan, then Gabriel is not better.
If Norman is not determined or Philbert is better, then Anthony is not embarrassed.
If someone is not tired or not tan, then he is not unable.
Stuart being tired and Stuart being not embarrassed imply that Hunter is unable.
If someone is both not tired and unable, then he is not better.
If there is nobody who is not not embarrassed, then Stuart is tan.
Anthony is tan if and only if Hunter is not unable.
Someone being both better and not unable is equivalent to being not determined and tired.
If someone is tan, then he is tired.
If there is someone who is either not embarrassed or better, then Norman is not determined.
If Hunter is tan, then Anthony is not tired and Anthony is embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Anthony is not tired and Hector is not unable once knowing that Hector is better. | Norman is unable. | self_contradiction |
Norman is not embarrassed.
Hector is not determined.
Norman is unable.
Stuart is not embarrassed.
Stuart is not tan.
Hunter is not tan.
Hector is embarrassed.
Philbert is unable.
Hunter is embarrassed.
Gabriel is determined.
Norman is tan.
Norman is not tired.If there is at least one people who is both embarrassed and not tan, then Gabriel is not better.
If Norman is not determined or Philbert is better, then Anthony is not embarrassed.
If someone is not tired or not tan, then he is not unable.
Stuart being tired and Stuart being not embarrassed imply that Hunter is unable.
If someone is both not tired and unable, then he is not better.
If there is nobody who is not not embarrassed, then Stuart is tan.
Anthony is tan if and only if Hunter is not unable.
Someone being both better and not unable is equivalent to being not determined and tired.
If someone is tan, then he is tired.
If there is someone who is either not embarrassed or better, then Norman is not determined.
If Hunter is tan, then Anthony is not tired and Anthony is embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Anthony is not tired and Hector is not unable once knowing that Hector is better. | Stuart is tired. | neutral |
Norman is not embarrassed.
Hector is not determined.
Norman is unable.
Stuart is not embarrassed.
Stuart is not tan.
Hunter is not tan.
Hector is embarrassed.
Philbert is unable.
Hunter is embarrassed.
Gabriel is determined.
Norman is tan.
Norman is not tired.If there is at least one people who is both embarrassed and not tan, then Gabriel is not better.
If Norman is not determined or Philbert is better, then Anthony is not embarrassed.
If someone is not tired or not tan, then he is not unable.
Stuart being tired and Stuart being not embarrassed imply that Hunter is unable.
If someone is both not tired and unable, then he is not better.
If there is nobody who is not not embarrassed, then Stuart is tan.
Anthony is tan if and only if Hunter is not unable.
Someone being both better and not unable is equivalent to being not determined and tired.
If someone is tan, then he is tired.
If there is someone who is either not embarrassed or better, then Norman is not determined.
If Hunter is tan, then Anthony is not tired and Anthony is embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Anthony is not tired and Hector is not unable once knowing that Hector is better. | Hunter is not tired. | neutral |
Norman is not embarrassed.
Hector is not determined.
Norman is unable.
Stuart is not embarrassed.
Stuart is not tan.
Hunter is not tan.
Hector is embarrassed.
Philbert is unable.
Hunter is embarrassed.
Gabriel is determined.
Norman is tan.
Norman is not tired.If there is at least one people who is both embarrassed and not tan, then Gabriel is not better.
If Norman is not determined or Philbert is better, then Anthony is not embarrassed.
If someone is not tired or not tan, then he is not unable.
Stuart being tired and Stuart being not embarrassed imply that Hunter is unable.
If someone is both not tired and unable, then he is not better.
If there is nobody who is not not embarrassed, then Stuart is tan.
Anthony is tan if and only if Hunter is not unable.
Someone being both better and not unable is equivalent to being not determined and tired.
If someone is tan, then he is tired.
If there is someone who is either not embarrassed or better, then Norman is not determined.
If Hunter is tan, then Anthony is not tired and Anthony is embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Anthony is not tired and Hector is not unable once knowing that Hector is better. | Stuart is unable. | contradiction |
Norman is not embarrassed.
Hector is not determined.
Norman is unable.
Stuart is not embarrassed.
Stuart is not tan.
Hunter is not tan.
Hector is embarrassed.
Philbert is unable.
Hunter is embarrassed.
Gabriel is determined.
Norman is tan.
Norman is not tired.If there is at least one people who is both embarrassed and not tan, then Gabriel is not better.
If Norman is not determined or Philbert is better, then Anthony is not embarrassed.
If someone is not tired or not tan, then he is not unable.
Stuart being tired and Stuart being not embarrassed imply that Hunter is unable.
If someone is both not tired and unable, then he is not better.
If there is nobody who is not not embarrassed, then Stuart is tan.
Anthony is tan if and only if Hunter is not unable.
Someone being both better and not unable is equivalent to being not determined and tired.
If someone is tan, then he is tired.
If there is someone who is either not embarrassed or better, then Norman is not determined.
If Hunter is tan, then Anthony is not tired and Anthony is embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Anthony is not tired and Hector is not unable once knowing that Hector is better. | Hector is not determined. | entailment |
Norman is not embarrassed.
Hector is not determined.
Norman is unable.
Stuart is not embarrassed.
Stuart is not tan.
Hunter is not tan.
Hector is embarrassed.
Philbert is unable.
Hunter is embarrassed.
Gabriel is determined.
Norman is tan.
Norman is not tired.If there is at least one people who is both embarrassed and not tan, then Gabriel is not better.
If Norman is not determined or Philbert is better, then Anthony is not embarrassed.
If someone is not tired or not tan, then he is not unable.
Stuart being tired and Stuart being not embarrassed imply that Hunter is unable.
If someone is both not tired and unable, then he is not better.
If there is nobody who is not not embarrassed, then Stuart is tan.
Anthony is tan if and only if Hunter is not unable.
Someone being both better and not unable is equivalent to being not determined and tired.
If someone is tan, then he is tired.
If there is someone who is either not embarrassed or better, then Norman is not determined.
If Hunter is tan, then Anthony is not tired and Anthony is embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Anthony is not tired and Hector is not unable once knowing that Hector is better. | Stuart is embarrassed. | contradiction |
Norman is not embarrassed.
Hector is not determined.
Norman is unable.
Stuart is not embarrassed.
Stuart is not tan.
Hunter is not tan.
Hector is embarrassed.
Philbert is unable.
Hunter is embarrassed.
Gabriel is determined.
Norman is tan.
Norman is not tired.If there is at least one people who is both embarrassed and not tan, then Gabriel is not better.
If Norman is not determined or Philbert is better, then Anthony is not embarrassed.
If someone is not tired or not tan, then he is not unable.
Stuart being tired and Stuart being not embarrassed imply that Hunter is unable.
If someone is both not tired and unable, then he is not better.
If there is nobody who is not not embarrassed, then Stuart is tan.
Anthony is tan if and only if Hunter is not unable.
Someone being both better and not unable is equivalent to being not determined and tired.
If someone is tan, then he is tired.
If there is someone who is either not embarrassed or better, then Norman is not determined.
If Hunter is tan, then Anthony is not tired and Anthony is embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Anthony is not tired and Hector is not unable once knowing that Hector is better. | Norman is determined. | contradiction |
Norman is not embarrassed.
Hector is not determined.
Norman is unable.
Stuart is not embarrassed.
Stuart is not tan.
Hunter is not tan.
Hector is embarrassed.
Philbert is unable.
Hunter is embarrassed.
Gabriel is determined.
Norman is tan.
Norman is not tired.If there is at least one people who is both embarrassed and not tan, then Gabriel is not better.
If Norman is not determined or Philbert is better, then Anthony is not embarrassed.
If someone is not tired or not tan, then he is not unable.
Stuart being tired and Stuart being not embarrassed imply that Hunter is unable.
If someone is both not tired and unable, then he is not better.
If there is nobody who is not not embarrassed, then Stuart is tan.
Anthony is tan if and only if Hunter is not unable.
Someone being both better and not unable is equivalent to being not determined and tired.
If someone is tan, then he is tired.
If there is someone who is either not embarrassed or better, then Norman is not determined.
If Hunter is tan, then Anthony is not tired and Anthony is embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Anthony is not tired and Hector is not unable once knowing that Hector is better. | Hunter is unable. | contradiction |
Norman is not embarrassed.
Hector is not determined.
Norman is unable.
Stuart is not embarrassed.
Stuart is not tan.
Hunter is not tan.
Hector is embarrassed.
Philbert is unable.
Hunter is embarrassed.
Gabriel is determined.
Norman is tan.
Norman is not tired.If there is at least one people who is both embarrassed and not tan, then Gabriel is not better.
If Norman is not determined or Philbert is better, then Anthony is not embarrassed.
If someone is not tired or not tan, then he is not unable.
Stuart being tired and Stuart being not embarrassed imply that Hunter is unable.
If someone is both not tired and unable, then he is not better.
If there is nobody who is not not embarrassed, then Stuart is tan.
Anthony is tan if and only if Hunter is not unable.
Someone being both better and not unable is equivalent to being not determined and tired.
If someone is tan, then he is tired.
If there is someone who is either not embarrassed or better, then Norman is not determined.
If Hunter is tan, then Anthony is not tired and Anthony is embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Anthony is not tired and Hector is not unable once knowing that Hector is better. | Anthony is not embarrassed. | entailment |
Norman is not embarrassed.
Hector is not determined.
Norman is unable.
Stuart is not embarrassed.
Stuart is not tan.
Hunter is not tan.
Hector is embarrassed.
Philbert is unable.
Hunter is embarrassed.
Gabriel is determined.
Norman is tan.
Norman is not tired.If there is at least one people who is both embarrassed and not tan, then Gabriel is not better.
If Norman is not determined or Philbert is better, then Anthony is not embarrassed.
If someone is not tired or not tan, then he is not unable.
Stuart being tired and Stuart being not embarrassed imply that Hunter is unable.
If someone is both not tired and unable, then he is not better.
If there is nobody who is not not embarrassed, then Stuart is tan.
Anthony is tan if and only if Hunter is not unable.
Someone being both better and not unable is equivalent to being not determined and tired.
If someone is tan, then he is tired.
If there is someone who is either not embarrassed or better, then Norman is not determined.
If Hunter is tan, then Anthony is not tired and Anthony is embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Anthony is not tired and Hector is not unable once knowing that Hector is better. | Norman is embarrassed. | contradiction |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.