premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Lucille is not mean.
Alfie is not mean.
Tracey is mean.
Alfie is not realistic.
Marcus is not careful.
Tracey is realistic.
Lucille is not careful.
Gloria is vivacious.
Marcus is vivacious.
Valentina is realistic.
Lucille is not realistic.
Gloria is not nice.Gloria being mean is equivalent to Marcus being careful.
It can be concluded that Alfie is not careful and Alfie is visible once knowing that Alfie is mean.
Tracey being not nice is equivalent to Valentina being vivacious and Trent being visible.
If someone is not visible or he is vivacious, then he is careful.
Marcus being not visible or Trent being vivacious implies that Alfie is nice.
As long as someone is not nice, he is visible and realistic.
Gloria being vivacious is equivalent to Tracey being not realistic and Lucille being nice.
Someone being not nice is equivalent to being not realistic.
If someone is not realistic and not vivacious, then he is both not careful and not nice, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not vivacious, he is not careful and mean.
If there is nobody who is not vivacious, then Alfie is mean.
If Gloria is mean, then Gloria is nice and Valentina is not visible, and vice versa. | Marcus is visible. | neutral |
Lucille is not mean.
Alfie is not mean.
Tracey is mean.
Alfie is not realistic.
Marcus is not careful.
Tracey is realistic.
Lucille is not careful.
Gloria is vivacious.
Marcus is vivacious.
Valentina is realistic.
Lucille is not realistic.
Gloria is not nice.Gloria being mean is equivalent to Marcus being careful.
It can be concluded that Alfie is not careful and Alfie is visible once knowing that Alfie is mean.
Tracey being not nice is equivalent to Valentina being vivacious and Trent being visible.
If someone is not visible or he is vivacious, then he is careful.
Marcus being not visible or Trent being vivacious implies that Alfie is nice.
As long as someone is not nice, he is visible and realistic.
Gloria being vivacious is equivalent to Tracey being not realistic and Lucille being nice.
Someone being not nice is equivalent to being not realistic.
If someone is not realistic and not vivacious, then he is both not careful and not nice, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not vivacious, he is not careful and mean.
If there is nobody who is not vivacious, then Alfie is mean.
If Gloria is mean, then Gloria is nice and Valentina is not visible, and vice versa. | Alfie is not nice. | entailment |
Lucille is not mean.
Alfie is not mean.
Tracey is mean.
Alfie is not realistic.
Marcus is not careful.
Tracey is realistic.
Lucille is not careful.
Gloria is vivacious.
Marcus is vivacious.
Valentina is realistic.
Lucille is not realistic.
Gloria is not nice.Gloria being mean is equivalent to Marcus being careful.
It can be concluded that Alfie is not careful and Alfie is visible once knowing that Alfie is mean.
Tracey being not nice is equivalent to Valentina being vivacious and Trent being visible.
If someone is not visible or he is vivacious, then he is careful.
Marcus being not visible or Trent being vivacious implies that Alfie is nice.
As long as someone is not nice, he is visible and realistic.
Gloria being vivacious is equivalent to Tracey being not realistic and Lucille being nice.
Someone being not nice is equivalent to being not realistic.
If someone is not realistic and not vivacious, then he is both not careful and not nice, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not vivacious, he is not careful and mean.
If there is nobody who is not vivacious, then Alfie is mean.
If Gloria is mean, then Gloria is nice and Valentina is not visible, and vice versa. | Tracey is not visible. | contradiction |
Lucille is not mean.
Alfie is not mean.
Tracey is mean.
Alfie is not realistic.
Marcus is not careful.
Tracey is realistic.
Lucille is not careful.
Gloria is vivacious.
Marcus is vivacious.
Valentina is realistic.
Lucille is not realistic.
Gloria is not nice.Gloria being mean is equivalent to Marcus being careful.
It can be concluded that Alfie is not careful and Alfie is visible once knowing that Alfie is mean.
Tracey being not nice is equivalent to Valentina being vivacious and Trent being visible.
If someone is not visible or he is vivacious, then he is careful.
Marcus being not visible or Trent being vivacious implies that Alfie is nice.
As long as someone is not nice, he is visible and realistic.
Gloria being vivacious is equivalent to Tracey being not realistic and Lucille being nice.
Someone being not nice is equivalent to being not realistic.
If someone is not realistic and not vivacious, then he is both not careful and not nice, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not vivacious, he is not careful and mean.
If there is nobody who is not vivacious, then Alfie is mean.
If Gloria is mean, then Gloria is nice and Valentina is not visible, and vice versa. | Valentina is vivacious. | entailment |
Lucille is not mean.
Alfie is not mean.
Tracey is mean.
Alfie is not realistic.
Marcus is not careful.
Tracey is realistic.
Lucille is not careful.
Gloria is vivacious.
Marcus is vivacious.
Valentina is realistic.
Lucille is not realistic.
Gloria is not nice.Gloria being mean is equivalent to Marcus being careful.
It can be concluded that Alfie is not careful and Alfie is visible once knowing that Alfie is mean.
Tracey being not nice is equivalent to Valentina being vivacious and Trent being visible.
If someone is not visible or he is vivacious, then he is careful.
Marcus being not visible or Trent being vivacious implies that Alfie is nice.
As long as someone is not nice, he is visible and realistic.
Gloria being vivacious is equivalent to Tracey being not realistic and Lucille being nice.
Someone being not nice is equivalent to being not realistic.
If someone is not realistic and not vivacious, then he is both not careful and not nice, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not vivacious, he is not careful and mean.
If there is nobody who is not vivacious, then Alfie is mean.
If Gloria is mean, then Gloria is nice and Valentina is not visible, and vice versa. | Gloria is nice. | self_contradiction |
Lucille is not mean.
Alfie is not mean.
Tracey is mean.
Alfie is not realistic.
Marcus is not careful.
Tracey is realistic.
Lucille is not careful.
Gloria is vivacious.
Marcus is vivacious.
Valentina is realistic.
Lucille is not realistic.
Gloria is not nice.Gloria being mean is equivalent to Marcus being careful.
It can be concluded that Alfie is not careful and Alfie is visible once knowing that Alfie is mean.
Tracey being not nice is equivalent to Valentina being vivacious and Trent being visible.
If someone is not visible or he is vivacious, then he is careful.
Marcus being not visible or Trent being vivacious implies that Alfie is nice.
As long as someone is not nice, he is visible and realistic.
Gloria being vivacious is equivalent to Tracey being not realistic and Lucille being nice.
Someone being not nice is equivalent to being not realistic.
If someone is not realistic and not vivacious, then he is both not careful and not nice, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not vivacious, he is not careful and mean.
If there is nobody who is not vivacious, then Alfie is mean.
If Gloria is mean, then Gloria is nice and Valentina is not visible, and vice versa. | Alfie is careful. | neutral |
Lucille is not mean.
Alfie is not mean.
Tracey is mean.
Alfie is not realistic.
Marcus is not careful.
Tracey is realistic.
Lucille is not careful.
Gloria is vivacious.
Marcus is vivacious.
Valentina is realistic.
Lucille is not realistic.
Gloria is not nice.Gloria being mean is equivalent to Marcus being careful.
It can be concluded that Alfie is not careful and Alfie is visible once knowing that Alfie is mean.
Tracey being not nice is equivalent to Valentina being vivacious and Trent being visible.
If someone is not visible or he is vivacious, then he is careful.
Marcus being not visible or Trent being vivacious implies that Alfie is nice.
As long as someone is not nice, he is visible and realistic.
Gloria being vivacious is equivalent to Tracey being not realistic and Lucille being nice.
Someone being not nice is equivalent to being not realistic.
If someone is not realistic and not vivacious, then he is both not careful and not nice, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not vivacious, he is not careful and mean.
If there is nobody who is not vivacious, then Alfie is mean.
If Gloria is mean, then Gloria is nice and Valentina is not visible, and vice versa. | Lucille is not visible. | contradiction |
Lucille is not mean.
Alfie is not mean.
Tracey is mean.
Alfie is not realistic.
Marcus is not careful.
Tracey is realistic.
Lucille is not careful.
Gloria is vivacious.
Marcus is vivacious.
Valentina is realistic.
Lucille is not realistic.
Gloria is not nice.Gloria being mean is equivalent to Marcus being careful.
It can be concluded that Alfie is not careful and Alfie is visible once knowing that Alfie is mean.
Tracey being not nice is equivalent to Valentina being vivacious and Trent being visible.
If someone is not visible or he is vivacious, then he is careful.
Marcus being not visible or Trent being vivacious implies that Alfie is nice.
As long as someone is not nice, he is visible and realistic.
Gloria being vivacious is equivalent to Tracey being not realistic and Lucille being nice.
Someone being not nice is equivalent to being not realistic.
If someone is not realistic and not vivacious, then he is both not careful and not nice, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not vivacious, he is not careful and mean.
If there is nobody who is not vivacious, then Alfie is mean.
If Gloria is mean, then Gloria is nice and Valentina is not visible, and vice versa. | Lucille is nice. | self_contradiction |
Lucille is not mean.
Alfie is not mean.
Tracey is mean.
Alfie is not realistic.
Marcus is not careful.
Tracey is realistic.
Lucille is not careful.
Gloria is vivacious.
Marcus is vivacious.
Valentina is realistic.
Lucille is not realistic.
Gloria is not nice.Gloria being mean is equivalent to Marcus being careful.
It can be concluded that Alfie is not careful and Alfie is visible once knowing that Alfie is mean.
Tracey being not nice is equivalent to Valentina being vivacious and Trent being visible.
If someone is not visible or he is vivacious, then he is careful.
Marcus being not visible or Trent being vivacious implies that Alfie is nice.
As long as someone is not nice, he is visible and realistic.
Gloria being vivacious is equivalent to Tracey being not realistic and Lucille being nice.
Someone being not nice is equivalent to being not realistic.
If someone is not realistic and not vivacious, then he is both not careful and not nice, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not vivacious, he is not careful and mean.
If there is nobody who is not vivacious, then Alfie is mean.
If Gloria is mean, then Gloria is nice and Valentina is not visible, and vice versa. | Lucille is not vivacious. | entailment |
Lucille is not mean.
Alfie is not mean.
Tracey is mean.
Alfie is not realistic.
Marcus is not careful.
Tracey is realistic.
Lucille is not careful.
Gloria is vivacious.
Marcus is vivacious.
Valentina is realistic.
Lucille is not realistic.
Gloria is not nice.Gloria being mean is equivalent to Marcus being careful.
It can be concluded that Alfie is not careful and Alfie is visible once knowing that Alfie is mean.
Tracey being not nice is equivalent to Valentina being vivacious and Trent being visible.
If someone is not visible or he is vivacious, then he is careful.
Marcus being not visible or Trent being vivacious implies that Alfie is nice.
As long as someone is not nice, he is visible and realistic.
Gloria being vivacious is equivalent to Tracey being not realistic and Lucille being nice.
Someone being not nice is equivalent to being not realistic.
If someone is not realistic and not vivacious, then he is both not careful and not nice, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not vivacious, he is not careful and mean.
If there is nobody who is not vivacious, then Alfie is mean.
If Gloria is mean, then Gloria is nice and Valentina is not visible, and vice versa. | Lucille is mean. | self_contradiction |
Lucille is not mean.
Alfie is not mean.
Tracey is mean.
Alfie is not realistic.
Marcus is not careful.
Tracey is realistic.
Lucille is not careful.
Gloria is vivacious.
Marcus is vivacious.
Valentina is realistic.
Lucille is not realistic.
Gloria is not nice.Gloria being mean is equivalent to Marcus being careful.
It can be concluded that Alfie is not careful and Alfie is visible once knowing that Alfie is mean.
Tracey being not nice is equivalent to Valentina being vivacious and Trent being visible.
If someone is not visible or he is vivacious, then he is careful.
Marcus being not visible or Trent being vivacious implies that Alfie is nice.
As long as someone is not nice, he is visible and realistic.
Gloria being vivacious is equivalent to Tracey being not realistic and Lucille being nice.
Someone being not nice is equivalent to being not realistic.
If someone is not realistic and not vivacious, then he is both not careful and not nice, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not vivacious, he is not careful and mean.
If there is nobody who is not vivacious, then Alfie is mean.
If Gloria is mean, then Gloria is nice and Valentina is not visible, and vice versa. | Trent is careful. | neutral |
Lucille is not mean.
Alfie is not mean.
Tracey is mean.
Alfie is not realistic.
Marcus is not careful.
Tracey is realistic.
Lucille is not careful.
Gloria is vivacious.
Marcus is vivacious.
Valentina is realistic.
Lucille is not realistic.
Gloria is not nice.Gloria being mean is equivalent to Marcus being careful.
It can be concluded that Alfie is not careful and Alfie is visible once knowing that Alfie is mean.
Tracey being not nice is equivalent to Valentina being vivacious and Trent being visible.
If someone is not visible or he is vivacious, then he is careful.
Marcus being not visible or Trent being vivacious implies that Alfie is nice.
As long as someone is not nice, he is visible and realistic.
Gloria being vivacious is equivalent to Tracey being not realistic and Lucille being nice.
Someone being not nice is equivalent to being not realistic.
If someone is not realistic and not vivacious, then he is both not careful and not nice, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not vivacious, he is not careful and mean.
If there is nobody who is not vivacious, then Alfie is mean.
If Gloria is mean, then Gloria is nice and Valentina is not visible, and vice versa. | Marcus is realistic. | neutral |
Lucille is not mean.
Alfie is not mean.
Tracey is mean.
Alfie is not realistic.
Marcus is not careful.
Tracey is realistic.
Lucille is not careful.
Gloria is vivacious.
Marcus is vivacious.
Valentina is realistic.
Lucille is not realistic.
Gloria is not nice.Gloria being mean is equivalent to Marcus being careful.
It can be concluded that Alfie is not careful and Alfie is visible once knowing that Alfie is mean.
Tracey being not nice is equivalent to Valentina being vivacious and Trent being visible.
If someone is not visible or he is vivacious, then he is careful.
Marcus being not visible or Trent being vivacious implies that Alfie is nice.
As long as someone is not nice, he is visible and realistic.
Gloria being vivacious is equivalent to Tracey being not realistic and Lucille being nice.
Someone being not nice is equivalent to being not realistic.
If someone is not realistic and not vivacious, then he is both not careful and not nice, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not vivacious, he is not careful and mean.
If there is nobody who is not vivacious, then Alfie is mean.
If Gloria is mean, then Gloria is nice and Valentina is not visible, and vice versa. | Gloria is not realistic. | self_contradiction |
Lucille is not mean.
Alfie is not mean.
Tracey is mean.
Alfie is not realistic.
Marcus is not careful.
Tracey is realistic.
Lucille is not careful.
Gloria is vivacious.
Marcus is vivacious.
Valentina is realistic.
Lucille is not realistic.
Gloria is not nice.Gloria being mean is equivalent to Marcus being careful.
It can be concluded that Alfie is not careful and Alfie is visible once knowing that Alfie is mean.
Tracey being not nice is equivalent to Valentina being vivacious and Trent being visible.
If someone is not visible or he is vivacious, then he is careful.
Marcus being not visible or Trent being vivacious implies that Alfie is nice.
As long as someone is not nice, he is visible and realistic.
Gloria being vivacious is equivalent to Tracey being not realistic and Lucille being nice.
Someone being not nice is equivalent to being not realistic.
If someone is not realistic and not vivacious, then he is both not careful and not nice, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not vivacious, he is not careful and mean.
If there is nobody who is not vivacious, then Alfie is mean.
If Gloria is mean, then Gloria is nice and Valentina is not visible, and vice versa. | Valentina is realistic. | entailment |
Lucille is not mean.
Alfie is not mean.
Tracey is mean.
Alfie is not realistic.
Marcus is not careful.
Tracey is realistic.
Lucille is not careful.
Gloria is vivacious.
Marcus is vivacious.
Valentina is realistic.
Lucille is not realistic.
Gloria is not nice.Gloria being mean is equivalent to Marcus being careful.
It can be concluded that Alfie is not careful and Alfie is visible once knowing that Alfie is mean.
Tracey being not nice is equivalent to Valentina being vivacious and Trent being visible.
If someone is not visible or he is vivacious, then he is careful.
Marcus being not visible or Trent being vivacious implies that Alfie is nice.
As long as someone is not nice, he is visible and realistic.
Gloria being vivacious is equivalent to Tracey being not realistic and Lucille being nice.
Someone being not nice is equivalent to being not realistic.
If someone is not realistic and not vivacious, then he is both not careful and not nice, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not vivacious, he is not careful and mean.
If there is nobody who is not vivacious, then Alfie is mean.
If Gloria is mean, then Gloria is nice and Valentina is not visible, and vice versa. | Alfie is not mean. | entailment |
Lucille is not mean.
Alfie is not mean.
Tracey is mean.
Alfie is not realistic.
Marcus is not careful.
Tracey is realistic.
Lucille is not careful.
Gloria is vivacious.
Marcus is vivacious.
Valentina is realistic.
Lucille is not realistic.
Gloria is not nice.Gloria being mean is equivalent to Marcus being careful.
It can be concluded that Alfie is not careful and Alfie is visible once knowing that Alfie is mean.
Tracey being not nice is equivalent to Valentina being vivacious and Trent being visible.
If someone is not visible or he is vivacious, then he is careful.
Marcus being not visible or Trent being vivacious implies that Alfie is nice.
As long as someone is not nice, he is visible and realistic.
Gloria being vivacious is equivalent to Tracey being not realistic and Lucille being nice.
Someone being not nice is equivalent to being not realistic.
If someone is not realistic and not vivacious, then he is both not careful and not nice, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not vivacious, he is not careful and mean.
If there is nobody who is not vivacious, then Alfie is mean.
If Gloria is mean, then Gloria is nice and Valentina is not visible, and vice versa. | Alfie is not visible. | contradiction |
Lucille is not mean.
Alfie is not mean.
Tracey is mean.
Alfie is not realistic.
Marcus is not careful.
Tracey is realistic.
Lucille is not careful.
Gloria is vivacious.
Marcus is vivacious.
Valentina is realistic.
Lucille is not realistic.
Gloria is not nice.Gloria being mean is equivalent to Marcus being careful.
It can be concluded that Alfie is not careful and Alfie is visible once knowing that Alfie is mean.
Tracey being not nice is equivalent to Valentina being vivacious and Trent being visible.
If someone is not visible or he is vivacious, then he is careful.
Marcus being not visible or Trent being vivacious implies that Alfie is nice.
As long as someone is not nice, he is visible and realistic.
Gloria being vivacious is equivalent to Tracey being not realistic and Lucille being nice.
Someone being not nice is equivalent to being not realistic.
If someone is not realistic and not vivacious, then he is both not careful and not nice, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not vivacious, he is not careful and mean.
If there is nobody who is not vivacious, then Alfie is mean.
If Gloria is mean, then Gloria is nice and Valentina is not visible, and vice versa. | Trent is not visible. | contradiction |
Lucille is not mean.
Alfie is not mean.
Tracey is mean.
Alfie is not realistic.
Marcus is not careful.
Tracey is realistic.
Lucille is not careful.
Gloria is vivacious.
Marcus is vivacious.
Valentina is realistic.
Lucille is not realistic.
Gloria is not nice.Gloria being mean is equivalent to Marcus being careful.
It can be concluded that Alfie is not careful and Alfie is visible once knowing that Alfie is mean.
Tracey being not nice is equivalent to Valentina being vivacious and Trent being visible.
If someone is not visible or he is vivacious, then he is careful.
Marcus being not visible or Trent being vivacious implies that Alfie is nice.
As long as someone is not nice, he is visible and realistic.
Gloria being vivacious is equivalent to Tracey being not realistic and Lucille being nice.
Someone being not nice is equivalent to being not realistic.
If someone is not realistic and not vivacious, then he is both not careful and not nice, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not vivacious, he is not careful and mean.
If there is nobody who is not vivacious, then Alfie is mean.
If Gloria is mean, then Gloria is nice and Valentina is not visible, and vice versa. | Alfie is mean. | contradiction |
Lucille is not mean.
Alfie is not mean.
Tracey is mean.
Alfie is not realistic.
Marcus is not careful.
Tracey is realistic.
Lucille is not careful.
Gloria is vivacious.
Marcus is vivacious.
Valentina is realistic.
Lucille is not realistic.
Gloria is not nice.Gloria being mean is equivalent to Marcus being careful.
It can be concluded that Alfie is not careful and Alfie is visible once knowing that Alfie is mean.
Tracey being not nice is equivalent to Valentina being vivacious and Trent being visible.
If someone is not visible or he is vivacious, then he is careful.
Marcus being not visible or Trent being vivacious implies that Alfie is nice.
As long as someone is not nice, he is visible and realistic.
Gloria being vivacious is equivalent to Tracey being not realistic and Lucille being nice.
Someone being not nice is equivalent to being not realistic.
If someone is not realistic and not vivacious, then he is both not careful and not nice, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not vivacious, he is not careful and mean.
If there is nobody who is not vivacious, then Alfie is mean.
If Gloria is mean, then Gloria is nice and Valentina is not visible, and vice versa. | Tracey is realistic. | self_contradiction |
Lucille is not mean.
Alfie is not mean.
Tracey is mean.
Alfie is not realistic.
Marcus is not careful.
Tracey is realistic.
Lucille is not careful.
Gloria is vivacious.
Marcus is vivacious.
Valentina is realistic.
Lucille is not realistic.
Gloria is not nice.Gloria being mean is equivalent to Marcus being careful.
It can be concluded that Alfie is not careful and Alfie is visible once knowing that Alfie is mean.
Tracey being not nice is equivalent to Valentina being vivacious and Trent being visible.
If someone is not visible or he is vivacious, then he is careful.
Marcus being not visible or Trent being vivacious implies that Alfie is nice.
As long as someone is not nice, he is visible and realistic.
Gloria being vivacious is equivalent to Tracey being not realistic and Lucille being nice.
Someone being not nice is equivalent to being not realistic.
If someone is not realistic and not vivacious, then he is both not careful and not nice, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not vivacious, he is not careful and mean.
If there is nobody who is not vivacious, then Alfie is mean.
If Gloria is mean, then Gloria is nice and Valentina is not visible, and vice versa. | Trent is nice. | neutral |
Carlos is silly.
Lauren is not silly.
Carlos is green.
Neil is not wet.
Neil is powerful.
Neil is not green.
Lauren is green.
Maribel is powerful.
Mila is powerful.
Kathryn is not powerful.
Kathryn is not wet.
Lauren is not wet.If someone who is not silly is also powerful, then he is not green.
If someone is not silly or powerful, then he is attentive.
Someone who is eithor suitable or not powerful is always not attentive.
If there is at least one people who is both not attentive and not wet, then Carlos is not silly.
If everyone is suitable or not wet, then Mila is green.
Someone who is not green is always both attentive and not silly.
If everyone is not attentive, then Neil is not suitable and Kianna is not silly.
If someone is either not powerful or not suitable, then he is not green and wet.
Someone being both not wet and not silly is equivalent to being suitable.
If there is someone who is not wet, then Lauren is silly and Kianna is not attentive.
If there is at least one people who is not silly or not attentive, then Kathryn is not green.
If Mila is green and Maribel is not wet, then Lauren is not silly. | Neil is wet. | contradiction |
Carlos is silly.
Lauren is not silly.
Carlos is green.
Neil is not wet.
Neil is powerful.
Neil is not green.
Lauren is green.
Maribel is powerful.
Mila is powerful.
Kathryn is not powerful.
Kathryn is not wet.
Lauren is not wet.If someone who is not silly is also powerful, then he is not green.
If someone is not silly or powerful, then he is attentive.
Someone who is eithor suitable or not powerful is always not attentive.
If there is at least one people who is both not attentive and not wet, then Carlos is not silly.
If everyone is suitable or not wet, then Mila is green.
Someone who is not green is always both attentive and not silly.
If everyone is not attentive, then Neil is not suitable and Kianna is not silly.
If someone is either not powerful or not suitable, then he is not green and wet.
Someone being both not wet and not silly is equivalent to being suitable.
If there is someone who is not wet, then Lauren is silly and Kianna is not attentive.
If there is at least one people who is not silly or not attentive, then Kathryn is not green.
If Mila is green and Maribel is not wet, then Lauren is not silly. | Lauren is suitable. | entailment |
Carlos is silly.
Lauren is not silly.
Carlos is green.
Neil is not wet.
Neil is powerful.
Neil is not green.
Lauren is green.
Maribel is powerful.
Mila is powerful.
Kathryn is not powerful.
Kathryn is not wet.
Lauren is not wet.If someone who is not silly is also powerful, then he is not green.
If someone is not silly or powerful, then he is attentive.
Someone who is eithor suitable or not powerful is always not attentive.
If there is at least one people who is both not attentive and not wet, then Carlos is not silly.
If everyone is suitable or not wet, then Mila is green.
Someone who is not green is always both attentive and not silly.
If everyone is not attentive, then Neil is not suitable and Kianna is not silly.
If someone is either not powerful or not suitable, then he is not green and wet.
Someone being both not wet and not silly is equivalent to being suitable.
If there is someone who is not wet, then Lauren is silly and Kianna is not attentive.
If there is at least one people who is not silly or not attentive, then Kathryn is not green.
If Mila is green and Maribel is not wet, then Lauren is not silly. | Mila is wet. | neutral |
Carlos is silly.
Lauren is not silly.
Carlos is green.
Neil is not wet.
Neil is powerful.
Neil is not green.
Lauren is green.
Maribel is powerful.
Mila is powerful.
Kathryn is not powerful.
Kathryn is not wet.
Lauren is not wet.If someone who is not silly is also powerful, then he is not green.
If someone is not silly or powerful, then he is attentive.
Someone who is eithor suitable or not powerful is always not attentive.
If there is at least one people who is both not attentive and not wet, then Carlos is not silly.
If everyone is suitable or not wet, then Mila is green.
Someone who is not green is always both attentive and not silly.
If everyone is not attentive, then Neil is not suitable and Kianna is not silly.
If someone is either not powerful or not suitable, then he is not green and wet.
Someone being both not wet and not silly is equivalent to being suitable.
If there is someone who is not wet, then Lauren is silly and Kianna is not attentive.
If there is at least one people who is not silly or not attentive, then Kathryn is not green.
If Mila is green and Maribel is not wet, then Lauren is not silly. | Carlos is silly. | self_contradiction |
Carlos is silly.
Lauren is not silly.
Carlos is green.
Neil is not wet.
Neil is powerful.
Neil is not green.
Lauren is green.
Maribel is powerful.
Mila is powerful.
Kathryn is not powerful.
Kathryn is not wet.
Lauren is not wet.If someone who is not silly is also powerful, then he is not green.
If someone is not silly or powerful, then he is attentive.
Someone who is eithor suitable or not powerful is always not attentive.
If there is at least one people who is both not attentive and not wet, then Carlos is not silly.
If everyone is suitable or not wet, then Mila is green.
Someone who is not green is always both attentive and not silly.
If everyone is not attentive, then Neil is not suitable and Kianna is not silly.
If someone is either not powerful or not suitable, then he is not green and wet.
Someone being both not wet and not silly is equivalent to being suitable.
If there is someone who is not wet, then Lauren is silly and Kianna is not attentive.
If there is at least one people who is not silly or not attentive, then Kathryn is not green.
If Mila is green and Maribel is not wet, then Lauren is not silly. | Carlos is powerful. | neutral |
Carlos is silly.
Lauren is not silly.
Carlos is green.
Neil is not wet.
Neil is powerful.
Neil is not green.
Lauren is green.
Maribel is powerful.
Mila is powerful.
Kathryn is not powerful.
Kathryn is not wet.
Lauren is not wet.If someone who is not silly is also powerful, then he is not green.
If someone is not silly or powerful, then he is attentive.
Someone who is eithor suitable or not powerful is always not attentive.
If there is at least one people who is both not attentive and not wet, then Carlos is not silly.
If everyone is suitable or not wet, then Mila is green.
Someone who is not green is always both attentive and not silly.
If everyone is not attentive, then Neil is not suitable and Kianna is not silly.
If someone is either not powerful or not suitable, then he is not green and wet.
Someone being both not wet and not silly is equivalent to being suitable.
If there is someone who is not wet, then Lauren is silly and Kianna is not attentive.
If there is at least one people who is not silly or not attentive, then Kathryn is not green.
If Mila is green and Maribel is not wet, then Lauren is not silly. | Kathryn is not attentive. | self_contradiction |
Carlos is silly.
Lauren is not silly.
Carlos is green.
Neil is not wet.
Neil is powerful.
Neil is not green.
Lauren is green.
Maribel is powerful.
Mila is powerful.
Kathryn is not powerful.
Kathryn is not wet.
Lauren is not wet.If someone who is not silly is also powerful, then he is not green.
If someone is not silly or powerful, then he is attentive.
Someone who is eithor suitable or not powerful is always not attentive.
If there is at least one people who is both not attentive and not wet, then Carlos is not silly.
If everyone is suitable or not wet, then Mila is green.
Someone who is not green is always both attentive and not silly.
If everyone is not attentive, then Neil is not suitable and Kianna is not silly.
If someone is either not powerful or not suitable, then he is not green and wet.
Someone being both not wet and not silly is equivalent to being suitable.
If there is someone who is not wet, then Lauren is silly and Kianna is not attentive.
If there is at least one people who is not silly or not attentive, then Kathryn is not green.
If Mila is green and Maribel is not wet, then Lauren is not silly. | Mila is not silly. | neutral |
Carlos is silly.
Lauren is not silly.
Carlos is green.
Neil is not wet.
Neil is powerful.
Neil is not green.
Lauren is green.
Maribel is powerful.
Mila is powerful.
Kathryn is not powerful.
Kathryn is not wet.
Lauren is not wet.If someone who is not silly is also powerful, then he is not green.
If someone is not silly or powerful, then he is attentive.
Someone who is eithor suitable or not powerful is always not attentive.
If there is at least one people who is both not attentive and not wet, then Carlos is not silly.
If everyone is suitable or not wet, then Mila is green.
Someone who is not green is always both attentive and not silly.
If everyone is not attentive, then Neil is not suitable and Kianna is not silly.
If someone is either not powerful or not suitable, then he is not green and wet.
Someone being both not wet and not silly is equivalent to being suitable.
If there is someone who is not wet, then Lauren is silly and Kianna is not attentive.
If there is at least one people who is not silly or not attentive, then Kathryn is not green.
If Mila is green and Maribel is not wet, then Lauren is not silly. | Kathryn is not powerful. | entailment |
Carlos is silly.
Lauren is not silly.
Carlos is green.
Neil is not wet.
Neil is powerful.
Neil is not green.
Lauren is green.
Maribel is powerful.
Mila is powerful.
Kathryn is not powerful.
Kathryn is not wet.
Lauren is not wet.If someone who is not silly is also powerful, then he is not green.
If someone is not silly or powerful, then he is attentive.
Someone who is eithor suitable or not powerful is always not attentive.
If there is at least one people who is both not attentive and not wet, then Carlos is not silly.
If everyone is suitable or not wet, then Mila is green.
Someone who is not green is always both attentive and not silly.
If everyone is not attentive, then Neil is not suitable and Kianna is not silly.
If someone is either not powerful or not suitable, then he is not green and wet.
Someone being both not wet and not silly is equivalent to being suitable.
If there is someone who is not wet, then Lauren is silly and Kianna is not attentive.
If there is at least one people who is not silly or not attentive, then Kathryn is not green.
If Mila is green and Maribel is not wet, then Lauren is not silly. | Kathryn is wet. | self_contradiction |
Carlos is silly.
Lauren is not silly.
Carlos is green.
Neil is not wet.
Neil is powerful.
Neil is not green.
Lauren is green.
Maribel is powerful.
Mila is powerful.
Kathryn is not powerful.
Kathryn is not wet.
Lauren is not wet.If someone who is not silly is also powerful, then he is not green.
If someone is not silly or powerful, then he is attentive.
Someone who is eithor suitable or not powerful is always not attentive.
If there is at least one people who is both not attentive and not wet, then Carlos is not silly.
If everyone is suitable or not wet, then Mila is green.
Someone who is not green is always both attentive and not silly.
If everyone is not attentive, then Neil is not suitable and Kianna is not silly.
If someone is either not powerful or not suitable, then he is not green and wet.
Someone being both not wet and not silly is equivalent to being suitable.
If there is someone who is not wet, then Lauren is silly and Kianna is not attentive.
If there is at least one people who is not silly or not attentive, then Kathryn is not green.
If Mila is green and Maribel is not wet, then Lauren is not silly. | Mila is green. | neutral |
Carlos is silly.
Lauren is not silly.
Carlos is green.
Neil is not wet.
Neil is powerful.
Neil is not green.
Lauren is green.
Maribel is powerful.
Mila is powerful.
Kathryn is not powerful.
Kathryn is not wet.
Lauren is not wet.If someone who is not silly is also powerful, then he is not green.
If someone is not silly or powerful, then he is attentive.
Someone who is eithor suitable or not powerful is always not attentive.
If there is at least one people who is both not attentive and not wet, then Carlos is not silly.
If everyone is suitable or not wet, then Mila is green.
Someone who is not green is always both attentive and not silly.
If everyone is not attentive, then Neil is not suitable and Kianna is not silly.
If someone is either not powerful or not suitable, then he is not green and wet.
Someone being both not wet and not silly is equivalent to being suitable.
If there is someone who is not wet, then Lauren is silly and Kianna is not attentive.
If there is at least one people who is not silly or not attentive, then Kathryn is not green.
If Mila is green and Maribel is not wet, then Lauren is not silly. | Kathryn is silly. | contradiction |
Carlos is silly.
Lauren is not silly.
Carlos is green.
Neil is not wet.
Neil is powerful.
Neil is not green.
Lauren is green.
Maribel is powerful.
Mila is powerful.
Kathryn is not powerful.
Kathryn is not wet.
Lauren is not wet.If someone who is not silly is also powerful, then he is not green.
If someone is not silly or powerful, then he is attentive.
Someone who is eithor suitable or not powerful is always not attentive.
If there is at least one people who is both not attentive and not wet, then Carlos is not silly.
If everyone is suitable or not wet, then Mila is green.
Someone who is not green is always both attentive and not silly.
If everyone is not attentive, then Neil is not suitable and Kianna is not silly.
If someone is either not powerful or not suitable, then he is not green and wet.
Someone being both not wet and not silly is equivalent to being suitable.
If there is someone who is not wet, then Lauren is silly and Kianna is not attentive.
If there is at least one people who is not silly or not attentive, then Kathryn is not green.
If Mila is green and Maribel is not wet, then Lauren is not silly. | Kathryn is green. | contradiction |
Carlos is silly.
Lauren is not silly.
Carlos is green.
Neil is not wet.
Neil is powerful.
Neil is not green.
Lauren is green.
Maribel is powerful.
Mila is powerful.
Kathryn is not powerful.
Kathryn is not wet.
Lauren is not wet.If someone who is not silly is also powerful, then he is not green.
If someone is not silly or powerful, then he is attentive.
Someone who is eithor suitable or not powerful is always not attentive.
If there is at least one people who is both not attentive and not wet, then Carlos is not silly.
If everyone is suitable or not wet, then Mila is green.
Someone who is not green is always both attentive and not silly.
If everyone is not attentive, then Neil is not suitable and Kianna is not silly.
If someone is either not powerful or not suitable, then he is not green and wet.
Someone being both not wet and not silly is equivalent to being suitable.
If there is someone who is not wet, then Lauren is silly and Kianna is not attentive.
If there is at least one people who is not silly or not attentive, then Kathryn is not green.
If Mila is green and Maribel is not wet, then Lauren is not silly. | Carlos is not green. | contradiction |
Carlos is silly.
Lauren is not silly.
Carlos is green.
Neil is not wet.
Neil is powerful.
Neil is not green.
Lauren is green.
Maribel is powerful.
Mila is powerful.
Kathryn is not powerful.
Kathryn is not wet.
Lauren is not wet.If someone who is not silly is also powerful, then he is not green.
If someone is not silly or powerful, then he is attentive.
Someone who is eithor suitable or not powerful is always not attentive.
If there is at least one people who is both not attentive and not wet, then Carlos is not silly.
If everyone is suitable or not wet, then Mila is green.
Someone who is not green is always both attentive and not silly.
If everyone is not attentive, then Neil is not suitable and Kianna is not silly.
If someone is either not powerful or not suitable, then he is not green and wet.
Someone being both not wet and not silly is equivalent to being suitable.
If there is someone who is not wet, then Lauren is silly and Kianna is not attentive.
If there is at least one people who is not silly or not attentive, then Kathryn is not green.
If Mila is green and Maribel is not wet, then Lauren is not silly. | Neil is not suitable. | contradiction |
Carlos is silly.
Lauren is not silly.
Carlos is green.
Neil is not wet.
Neil is powerful.
Neil is not green.
Lauren is green.
Maribel is powerful.
Mila is powerful.
Kathryn is not powerful.
Kathryn is not wet.
Lauren is not wet.If someone who is not silly is also powerful, then he is not green.
If someone is not silly or powerful, then he is attentive.
Someone who is eithor suitable or not powerful is always not attentive.
If there is at least one people who is both not attentive and not wet, then Carlos is not silly.
If everyone is suitable or not wet, then Mila is green.
Someone who is not green is always both attentive and not silly.
If everyone is not attentive, then Neil is not suitable and Kianna is not silly.
If someone is either not powerful or not suitable, then he is not green and wet.
Someone being both not wet and not silly is equivalent to being suitable.
If there is someone who is not wet, then Lauren is silly and Kianna is not attentive.
If there is at least one people who is not silly or not attentive, then Kathryn is not green.
If Mila is green and Maribel is not wet, then Lauren is not silly. | Lauren is not wet. | entailment |
Carlos is silly.
Lauren is not silly.
Carlos is green.
Neil is not wet.
Neil is powerful.
Neil is not green.
Lauren is green.
Maribel is powerful.
Mila is powerful.
Kathryn is not powerful.
Kathryn is not wet.
Lauren is not wet.If someone who is not silly is also powerful, then he is not green.
If someone is not silly or powerful, then he is attentive.
Someone who is eithor suitable or not powerful is always not attentive.
If there is at least one people who is both not attentive and not wet, then Carlos is not silly.
If everyone is suitable or not wet, then Mila is green.
Someone who is not green is always both attentive and not silly.
If everyone is not attentive, then Neil is not suitable and Kianna is not silly.
If someone is either not powerful or not suitable, then he is not green and wet.
Someone being both not wet and not silly is equivalent to being suitable.
If there is someone who is not wet, then Lauren is silly and Kianna is not attentive.
If there is at least one people who is not silly or not attentive, then Kathryn is not green.
If Mila is green and Maribel is not wet, then Lauren is not silly. | Kathryn is attentive. | self_contradiction |
Carlos is silly.
Lauren is not silly.
Carlos is green.
Neil is not wet.
Neil is powerful.
Neil is not green.
Lauren is green.
Maribel is powerful.
Mila is powerful.
Kathryn is not powerful.
Kathryn is not wet.
Lauren is not wet.If someone who is not silly is also powerful, then he is not green.
If someone is not silly or powerful, then he is attentive.
Someone who is eithor suitable or not powerful is always not attentive.
If there is at least one people who is both not attentive and not wet, then Carlos is not silly.
If everyone is suitable or not wet, then Mila is green.
Someone who is not green is always both attentive and not silly.
If everyone is not attentive, then Neil is not suitable and Kianna is not silly.
If someone is either not powerful or not suitable, then he is not green and wet.
Someone being both not wet and not silly is equivalent to being suitable.
If there is someone who is not wet, then Lauren is silly and Kianna is not attentive.
If there is at least one people who is not silly or not attentive, then Kathryn is not green.
If Mila is green and Maribel is not wet, then Lauren is not silly. | Mila is not green. | neutral |
Carlos is silly.
Lauren is not silly.
Carlos is green.
Neil is not wet.
Neil is powerful.
Neil is not green.
Lauren is green.
Maribel is powerful.
Mila is powerful.
Kathryn is not powerful.
Kathryn is not wet.
Lauren is not wet.If someone who is not silly is also powerful, then he is not green.
If someone is not silly or powerful, then he is attentive.
Someone who is eithor suitable or not powerful is always not attentive.
If there is at least one people who is both not attentive and not wet, then Carlos is not silly.
If everyone is suitable or not wet, then Mila is green.
Someone who is not green is always both attentive and not silly.
If everyone is not attentive, then Neil is not suitable and Kianna is not silly.
If someone is either not powerful or not suitable, then he is not green and wet.
Someone being both not wet and not silly is equivalent to being suitable.
If there is someone who is not wet, then Lauren is silly and Kianna is not attentive.
If there is at least one people who is not silly or not attentive, then Kathryn is not green.
If Mila is green and Maribel is not wet, then Lauren is not silly. | Neil is suitable. | entailment |
Carlos is silly.
Lauren is not silly.
Carlos is green.
Neil is not wet.
Neil is powerful.
Neil is not green.
Lauren is green.
Maribel is powerful.
Mila is powerful.
Kathryn is not powerful.
Kathryn is not wet.
Lauren is not wet.If someone who is not silly is also powerful, then he is not green.
If someone is not silly or powerful, then he is attentive.
Someone who is eithor suitable or not powerful is always not attentive.
If there is at least one people who is both not attentive and not wet, then Carlos is not silly.
If everyone is suitable or not wet, then Mila is green.
Someone who is not green is always both attentive and not silly.
If everyone is not attentive, then Neil is not suitable and Kianna is not silly.
If someone is either not powerful or not suitable, then he is not green and wet.
Someone being both not wet and not silly is equivalent to being suitable.
If there is someone who is not wet, then Lauren is silly and Kianna is not attentive.
If there is at least one people who is not silly or not attentive, then Kathryn is not green.
If Mila is green and Maribel is not wet, then Lauren is not silly. | Neil is not attentive. | self_contradiction |
Carlos is silly.
Lauren is not silly.
Carlos is green.
Neil is not wet.
Neil is powerful.
Neil is not green.
Lauren is green.
Maribel is powerful.
Mila is powerful.
Kathryn is not powerful.
Kathryn is not wet.
Lauren is not wet.If someone who is not silly is also powerful, then he is not green.
If someone is not silly or powerful, then he is attentive.
Someone who is eithor suitable or not powerful is always not attentive.
If there is at least one people who is both not attentive and not wet, then Carlos is not silly.
If everyone is suitable or not wet, then Mila is green.
Someone who is not green is always both attentive and not silly.
If everyone is not attentive, then Neil is not suitable and Kianna is not silly.
If someone is either not powerful or not suitable, then he is not green and wet.
Someone being both not wet and not silly is equivalent to being suitable.
If there is someone who is not wet, then Lauren is silly and Kianna is not attentive.
If there is at least one people who is not silly or not attentive, then Kathryn is not green.
If Mila is green and Maribel is not wet, then Lauren is not silly. | Neil is not wet. | entailment |
Tony is skinny.
Tony is not cool.
Collier is charming.
Collier is not psychological.
Sterling is psychological.
Olaf is plain.
Sean is plain.
Sean is not charming.
Melville is not charming.
Basil is not charming.
Collier is lucky.
Basil is skinny.If someone is not charming and skinny, then he is both psychological and not cool, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is plain or skinny, then Olaf is cool.
If there is at least one people who is not psychological or not skinny, then Sean is not plain.
Someone being not psychological is equivalent to being skinny.
All charming people are not plain.
If Tony is not charming, then Sterling is not cool and Olaf is plain.
If there is at least one people who is both lucky and not cool, then Sean is charming.
Someone who is cool is always both lucky and not charming.
Someone is psychological and cool if and only if he is not charming.
Sean being not psychological implies that Collier is charming and Melville is not plain.
Collier being not psychological and Collier being not skinny imply that Sterling is not plain.
If Sterling is not psychological, then Basil is charming. | Sean is not cool. | contradiction |
Tony is skinny.
Tony is not cool.
Collier is charming.
Collier is not psychological.
Sterling is psychological.
Olaf is plain.
Sean is plain.
Sean is not charming.
Melville is not charming.
Basil is not charming.
Collier is lucky.
Basil is skinny.If someone is not charming and skinny, then he is both psychological and not cool, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is plain or skinny, then Olaf is cool.
If there is at least one people who is not psychological or not skinny, then Sean is not plain.
Someone being not psychological is equivalent to being skinny.
All charming people are not plain.
If Tony is not charming, then Sterling is not cool and Olaf is plain.
If there is at least one people who is both lucky and not cool, then Sean is charming.
Someone who is cool is always both lucky and not charming.
Someone is psychological and cool if and only if he is not charming.
Sean being not psychological implies that Collier is charming and Melville is not plain.
Collier being not psychological and Collier being not skinny imply that Sterling is not plain.
If Sterling is not psychological, then Basil is charming. | Sean is not plain. | self_contradiction |
Tony is skinny.
Tony is not cool.
Collier is charming.
Collier is not psychological.
Sterling is psychological.
Olaf is plain.
Sean is plain.
Sean is not charming.
Melville is not charming.
Basil is not charming.
Collier is lucky.
Basil is skinny.If someone is not charming and skinny, then he is both psychological and not cool, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is plain or skinny, then Olaf is cool.
If there is at least one people who is not psychological or not skinny, then Sean is not plain.
Someone being not psychological is equivalent to being skinny.
All charming people are not plain.
If Tony is not charming, then Sterling is not cool and Olaf is plain.
If there is at least one people who is both lucky and not cool, then Sean is charming.
Someone who is cool is always both lucky and not charming.
Someone is psychological and cool if and only if he is not charming.
Sean being not psychological implies that Collier is charming and Melville is not plain.
Collier being not psychological and Collier being not skinny imply that Sterling is not plain.
If Sterling is not psychological, then Basil is charming. | Basil is not cool. | self_contradiction |
Tony is skinny.
Tony is not cool.
Collier is charming.
Collier is not psychological.
Sterling is psychological.
Olaf is plain.
Sean is plain.
Sean is not charming.
Melville is not charming.
Basil is not charming.
Collier is lucky.
Basil is skinny.If someone is not charming and skinny, then he is both psychological and not cool, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is plain or skinny, then Olaf is cool.
If there is at least one people who is not psychological or not skinny, then Sean is not plain.
Someone being not psychological is equivalent to being skinny.
All charming people are not plain.
If Tony is not charming, then Sterling is not cool and Olaf is plain.
If there is at least one people who is both lucky and not cool, then Sean is charming.
Someone who is cool is always both lucky and not charming.
Someone is psychological and cool if and only if he is not charming.
Sean being not psychological implies that Collier is charming and Melville is not plain.
Collier being not psychological and Collier being not skinny imply that Sterling is not plain.
If Sterling is not psychological, then Basil is charming. | Tony is not psychological. | entailment |
Tony is skinny.
Tony is not cool.
Collier is charming.
Collier is not psychological.
Sterling is psychological.
Olaf is plain.
Sean is plain.
Sean is not charming.
Melville is not charming.
Basil is not charming.
Collier is lucky.
Basil is skinny.If someone is not charming and skinny, then he is both psychological and not cool, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is plain or skinny, then Olaf is cool.
If there is at least one people who is not psychological or not skinny, then Sean is not plain.
Someone being not psychological is equivalent to being skinny.
All charming people are not plain.
If Tony is not charming, then Sterling is not cool and Olaf is plain.
If there is at least one people who is both lucky and not cool, then Sean is charming.
Someone who is cool is always both lucky and not charming.
Someone is psychological and cool if and only if he is not charming.
Sean being not psychological implies that Collier is charming and Melville is not plain.
Collier being not psychological and Collier being not skinny imply that Sterling is not plain.
If Sterling is not psychological, then Basil is charming. | Olaf is skinny. | neutral |
Tony is skinny.
Tony is not cool.
Collier is charming.
Collier is not psychological.
Sterling is psychological.
Olaf is plain.
Sean is plain.
Sean is not charming.
Melville is not charming.
Basil is not charming.
Collier is lucky.
Basil is skinny.If someone is not charming and skinny, then he is both psychological and not cool, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is plain or skinny, then Olaf is cool.
If there is at least one people who is not psychological or not skinny, then Sean is not plain.
Someone being not psychological is equivalent to being skinny.
All charming people are not plain.
If Tony is not charming, then Sterling is not cool and Olaf is plain.
If there is at least one people who is both lucky and not cool, then Sean is charming.
Someone who is cool is always both lucky and not charming.
Someone is psychological and cool if and only if he is not charming.
Sean being not psychological implies that Collier is charming and Melville is not plain.
Collier being not psychological and Collier being not skinny imply that Sterling is not plain.
If Sterling is not psychological, then Basil is charming. | Basil is not psychological. | self_contradiction |
Tony is skinny.
Tony is not cool.
Collier is charming.
Collier is not psychological.
Sterling is psychological.
Olaf is plain.
Sean is plain.
Sean is not charming.
Melville is not charming.
Basil is not charming.
Collier is lucky.
Basil is skinny.If someone is not charming and skinny, then he is both psychological and not cool, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is plain or skinny, then Olaf is cool.
If there is at least one people who is not psychological or not skinny, then Sean is not plain.
Someone being not psychological is equivalent to being skinny.
All charming people are not plain.
If Tony is not charming, then Sterling is not cool and Olaf is plain.
If there is at least one people who is both lucky and not cool, then Sean is charming.
Someone who is cool is always both lucky and not charming.
Someone is psychological and cool if and only if he is not charming.
Sean being not psychological implies that Collier is charming and Melville is not plain.
Collier being not psychological and Collier being not skinny imply that Sterling is not plain.
If Sterling is not psychological, then Basil is charming. | Basil is cool. | self_contradiction |
Tony is skinny.
Tony is not cool.
Collier is charming.
Collier is not psychological.
Sterling is psychological.
Olaf is plain.
Sean is plain.
Sean is not charming.
Melville is not charming.
Basil is not charming.
Collier is lucky.
Basil is skinny.If someone is not charming and skinny, then he is both psychological and not cool, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is plain or skinny, then Olaf is cool.
If there is at least one people who is not psychological or not skinny, then Sean is not plain.
Someone being not psychological is equivalent to being skinny.
All charming people are not plain.
If Tony is not charming, then Sterling is not cool and Olaf is plain.
If there is at least one people who is both lucky and not cool, then Sean is charming.
Someone who is cool is always both lucky and not charming.
Someone is psychological and cool if and only if he is not charming.
Sean being not psychological implies that Collier is charming and Melville is not plain.
Collier being not psychological and Collier being not skinny imply that Sterling is not plain.
If Sterling is not psychological, then Basil is charming. | Sterling is not charming. | neutral |
Tony is skinny.
Tony is not cool.
Collier is charming.
Collier is not psychological.
Sterling is psychological.
Olaf is plain.
Sean is plain.
Sean is not charming.
Melville is not charming.
Basil is not charming.
Collier is lucky.
Basil is skinny.If someone is not charming and skinny, then he is both psychological and not cool, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is plain or skinny, then Olaf is cool.
If there is at least one people who is not psychological or not skinny, then Sean is not plain.
Someone being not psychological is equivalent to being skinny.
All charming people are not plain.
If Tony is not charming, then Sterling is not cool and Olaf is plain.
If there is at least one people who is both lucky and not cool, then Sean is charming.
Someone who is cool is always both lucky and not charming.
Someone is psychological and cool if and only if he is not charming.
Sean being not psychological implies that Collier is charming and Melville is not plain.
Collier being not psychological and Collier being not skinny imply that Sterling is not plain.
If Sterling is not psychological, then Basil is charming. | Olaf is cool. | entailment |
Tony is skinny.
Tony is not cool.
Collier is charming.
Collier is not psychological.
Sterling is psychological.
Olaf is plain.
Sean is plain.
Sean is not charming.
Melville is not charming.
Basil is not charming.
Collier is lucky.
Basil is skinny.If someone is not charming and skinny, then he is both psychological and not cool, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is plain or skinny, then Olaf is cool.
If there is at least one people who is not psychological or not skinny, then Sean is not plain.
Someone being not psychological is equivalent to being skinny.
All charming people are not plain.
If Tony is not charming, then Sterling is not cool and Olaf is plain.
If there is at least one people who is both lucky and not cool, then Sean is charming.
Someone who is cool is always both lucky and not charming.
Someone is psychological and cool if and only if he is not charming.
Sean being not psychological implies that Collier is charming and Melville is not plain.
Collier being not psychological and Collier being not skinny imply that Sterling is not plain.
If Sterling is not psychological, then Basil is charming. | Sterling is not skinny. | neutral |
Tony is skinny.
Tony is not cool.
Collier is charming.
Collier is not psychological.
Sterling is psychological.
Olaf is plain.
Sean is plain.
Sean is not charming.
Melville is not charming.
Basil is not charming.
Collier is lucky.
Basil is skinny.If someone is not charming and skinny, then he is both psychological and not cool, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is plain or skinny, then Olaf is cool.
If there is at least one people who is not psychological or not skinny, then Sean is not plain.
Someone being not psychological is equivalent to being skinny.
All charming people are not plain.
If Tony is not charming, then Sterling is not cool and Olaf is plain.
If there is at least one people who is both lucky and not cool, then Sean is charming.
Someone who is cool is always both lucky and not charming.
Someone is psychological and cool if and only if he is not charming.
Sean being not psychological implies that Collier is charming and Melville is not plain.
Collier being not psychological and Collier being not skinny imply that Sterling is not plain.
If Sterling is not psychological, then Basil is charming. | Sterling is not psychological. | contradiction |
Tony is skinny.
Tony is not cool.
Collier is charming.
Collier is not psychological.
Sterling is psychological.
Olaf is plain.
Sean is plain.
Sean is not charming.
Melville is not charming.
Basil is not charming.
Collier is lucky.
Basil is skinny.If someone is not charming and skinny, then he is both psychological and not cool, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is plain or skinny, then Olaf is cool.
If there is at least one people who is not psychological or not skinny, then Sean is not plain.
Someone being not psychological is equivalent to being skinny.
All charming people are not plain.
If Tony is not charming, then Sterling is not cool and Olaf is plain.
If there is at least one people who is both lucky and not cool, then Sean is charming.
Someone who is cool is always both lucky and not charming.
Someone is psychological and cool if and only if he is not charming.
Sean being not psychological implies that Collier is charming and Melville is not plain.
Collier being not psychological and Collier being not skinny imply that Sterling is not plain.
If Sterling is not psychological, then Basil is charming. | Tony is skinny. | entailment |
Tony is skinny.
Tony is not cool.
Collier is charming.
Collier is not psychological.
Sterling is psychological.
Olaf is plain.
Sean is plain.
Sean is not charming.
Melville is not charming.
Basil is not charming.
Collier is lucky.
Basil is skinny.If someone is not charming and skinny, then he is both psychological and not cool, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is plain or skinny, then Olaf is cool.
If there is at least one people who is not psychological or not skinny, then Sean is not plain.
Someone being not psychological is equivalent to being skinny.
All charming people are not plain.
If Tony is not charming, then Sterling is not cool and Olaf is plain.
If there is at least one people who is both lucky and not cool, then Sean is charming.
Someone who is cool is always both lucky and not charming.
Someone is psychological and cool if and only if he is not charming.
Sean being not psychological implies that Collier is charming and Melville is not plain.
Collier being not psychological and Collier being not skinny imply that Sterling is not plain.
If Sterling is not psychological, then Basil is charming. | Olaf is charming. | contradiction |
Tony is skinny.
Tony is not cool.
Collier is charming.
Collier is not psychological.
Sterling is psychological.
Olaf is plain.
Sean is plain.
Sean is not charming.
Melville is not charming.
Basil is not charming.
Collier is lucky.
Basil is skinny.If someone is not charming and skinny, then he is both psychological and not cool, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is plain or skinny, then Olaf is cool.
If there is at least one people who is not psychological or not skinny, then Sean is not plain.
Someone being not psychological is equivalent to being skinny.
All charming people are not plain.
If Tony is not charming, then Sterling is not cool and Olaf is plain.
If there is at least one people who is both lucky and not cool, then Sean is charming.
Someone who is cool is always both lucky and not charming.
Someone is psychological and cool if and only if he is not charming.
Sean being not psychological implies that Collier is charming and Melville is not plain.
Collier being not psychological and Collier being not skinny imply that Sterling is not plain.
If Sterling is not psychological, then Basil is charming. | Melville is lucky. | entailment |
Tony is skinny.
Tony is not cool.
Collier is charming.
Collier is not psychological.
Sterling is psychological.
Olaf is plain.
Sean is plain.
Sean is not charming.
Melville is not charming.
Basil is not charming.
Collier is lucky.
Basil is skinny.If someone is not charming and skinny, then he is both psychological and not cool, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is plain or skinny, then Olaf is cool.
If there is at least one people who is not psychological or not skinny, then Sean is not plain.
Someone being not psychological is equivalent to being skinny.
All charming people are not plain.
If Tony is not charming, then Sterling is not cool and Olaf is plain.
If there is at least one people who is both lucky and not cool, then Sean is charming.
Someone who is cool is always both lucky and not charming.
Someone is psychological and cool if and only if he is not charming.
Sean being not psychological implies that Collier is charming and Melville is not plain.
Collier being not psychological and Collier being not skinny imply that Sterling is not plain.
If Sterling is not psychological, then Basil is charming. | Sean is plain. | self_contradiction |
Tony is skinny.
Tony is not cool.
Collier is charming.
Collier is not psychological.
Sterling is psychological.
Olaf is plain.
Sean is plain.
Sean is not charming.
Melville is not charming.
Basil is not charming.
Collier is lucky.
Basil is skinny.If someone is not charming and skinny, then he is both psychological and not cool, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is plain or skinny, then Olaf is cool.
If there is at least one people who is not psychological or not skinny, then Sean is not plain.
Someone being not psychological is equivalent to being skinny.
All charming people are not plain.
If Tony is not charming, then Sterling is not cool and Olaf is plain.
If there is at least one people who is both lucky and not cool, then Sean is charming.
Someone who is cool is always both lucky and not charming.
Someone is psychological and cool if and only if he is not charming.
Sean being not psychological implies that Collier is charming and Melville is not plain.
Collier being not psychological and Collier being not skinny imply that Sterling is not plain.
If Sterling is not psychological, then Basil is charming. | Melville is charming. | contradiction |
Tony is skinny.
Tony is not cool.
Collier is charming.
Collier is not psychological.
Sterling is psychological.
Olaf is plain.
Sean is plain.
Sean is not charming.
Melville is not charming.
Basil is not charming.
Collier is lucky.
Basil is skinny.If someone is not charming and skinny, then he is both psychological and not cool, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is plain or skinny, then Olaf is cool.
If there is at least one people who is not psychological or not skinny, then Sean is not plain.
Someone being not psychological is equivalent to being skinny.
All charming people are not plain.
If Tony is not charming, then Sterling is not cool and Olaf is plain.
If there is at least one people who is both lucky and not cool, then Sean is charming.
Someone who is cool is always both lucky and not charming.
Someone is psychological and cool if and only if he is not charming.
Sean being not psychological implies that Collier is charming and Melville is not plain.
Collier being not psychological and Collier being not skinny imply that Sterling is not plain.
If Sterling is not psychological, then Basil is charming. | Collier is not skinny. | contradiction |
Tony is skinny.
Tony is not cool.
Collier is charming.
Collier is not psychological.
Sterling is psychological.
Olaf is plain.
Sean is plain.
Sean is not charming.
Melville is not charming.
Basil is not charming.
Collier is lucky.
Basil is skinny.If someone is not charming and skinny, then he is both psychological and not cool, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is plain or skinny, then Olaf is cool.
If there is at least one people who is not psychological or not skinny, then Sean is not plain.
Someone being not psychological is equivalent to being skinny.
All charming people are not plain.
If Tony is not charming, then Sterling is not cool and Olaf is plain.
If there is at least one people who is both lucky and not cool, then Sean is charming.
Someone who is cool is always both lucky and not charming.
Someone is psychological and cool if and only if he is not charming.
Sean being not psychological implies that Collier is charming and Melville is not plain.
Collier being not psychological and Collier being not skinny imply that Sterling is not plain.
If Sterling is not psychological, then Basil is charming. | Olaf is not skinny. | neutral |
Tony is skinny.
Tony is not cool.
Collier is charming.
Collier is not psychological.
Sterling is psychological.
Olaf is plain.
Sean is plain.
Sean is not charming.
Melville is not charming.
Basil is not charming.
Collier is lucky.
Basil is skinny.If someone is not charming and skinny, then he is both psychological and not cool, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is plain or skinny, then Olaf is cool.
If there is at least one people who is not psychological or not skinny, then Sean is not plain.
Someone being not psychological is equivalent to being skinny.
All charming people are not plain.
If Tony is not charming, then Sterling is not cool and Olaf is plain.
If there is at least one people who is both lucky and not cool, then Sean is charming.
Someone who is cool is always both lucky and not charming.
Someone is psychological and cool if and only if he is not charming.
Sean being not psychological implies that Collier is charming and Melville is not plain.
Collier being not psychological and Collier being not skinny imply that Sterling is not plain.
If Sterling is not psychological, then Basil is charming. | Tony is not plain. | neutral |
Tony is skinny.
Tony is not cool.
Collier is charming.
Collier is not psychological.
Sterling is psychological.
Olaf is plain.
Sean is plain.
Sean is not charming.
Melville is not charming.
Basil is not charming.
Collier is lucky.
Basil is skinny.If someone is not charming and skinny, then he is both psychological and not cool, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is plain or skinny, then Olaf is cool.
If there is at least one people who is not psychological or not skinny, then Sean is not plain.
Someone being not psychological is equivalent to being skinny.
All charming people are not plain.
If Tony is not charming, then Sterling is not cool and Olaf is plain.
If there is at least one people who is both lucky and not cool, then Sean is charming.
Someone who is cool is always both lucky and not charming.
Someone is psychological and cool if and only if he is not charming.
Sean being not psychological implies that Collier is charming and Melville is not plain.
Collier being not psychological and Collier being not skinny imply that Sterling is not plain.
If Sterling is not psychological, then Basil is charming. | Collier is not psychological. | entailment |
Anthony is lively.
Calvert is not versatile.
Anthony is not tough.
Silas is not lively.
Calvert is not entire.
Calvert is not lively.
Renfred is friendly.
Shawn is versatile.
Renfred is not miniscule.
Kelvin is not friendly.
Shawn is friendly.
Kelvin is versatile.If someone is not lively or entire, then he is not tough.
If there is someone who is entire, then Shawn is not lively.
If there is at least one people who is not lively, then Silas is entire.
If Renfred is friendly, then Silas is not entire.
Someone is friendly if and only if he is versatile.
It can be concluded that Calvert is entire once knowing that Anthony is not lively and Blanche is tough.
If all people are not miniscule or versatile, then Kelvin is not lively.
If there is at least one people who is not tough, then Renfred is lively and Shawn is not entire.
If there is someone who is either friendly or not miniscule, then Renfred is not lively.
If someone is both not versatile and friendly, then he is not miniscule.
If someone is versatile and miniscule, then he is lively, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kelvin is not tough once knowing that Renfred is miniscule. | Kelvin is entire. | neutral |
Anthony is lively.
Calvert is not versatile.
Anthony is not tough.
Silas is not lively.
Calvert is not entire.
Calvert is not lively.
Renfred is friendly.
Shawn is versatile.
Renfred is not miniscule.
Kelvin is not friendly.
Shawn is friendly.
Kelvin is versatile.If someone is not lively or entire, then he is not tough.
If there is someone who is entire, then Shawn is not lively.
If there is at least one people who is not lively, then Silas is entire.
If Renfred is friendly, then Silas is not entire.
Someone is friendly if and only if he is versatile.
It can be concluded that Calvert is entire once knowing that Anthony is not lively and Blanche is tough.
If all people are not miniscule or versatile, then Kelvin is not lively.
If there is at least one people who is not tough, then Renfred is lively and Shawn is not entire.
If there is someone who is either friendly or not miniscule, then Renfred is not lively.
If someone is both not versatile and friendly, then he is not miniscule.
If someone is versatile and miniscule, then he is lively, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kelvin is not tough once knowing that Renfred is miniscule. | Shawn is not friendly. | contradiction |
Anthony is lively.
Calvert is not versatile.
Anthony is not tough.
Silas is not lively.
Calvert is not entire.
Calvert is not lively.
Renfred is friendly.
Shawn is versatile.
Renfred is not miniscule.
Kelvin is not friendly.
Shawn is friendly.
Kelvin is versatile.If someone is not lively or entire, then he is not tough.
If there is someone who is entire, then Shawn is not lively.
If there is at least one people who is not lively, then Silas is entire.
If Renfred is friendly, then Silas is not entire.
Someone is friendly if and only if he is versatile.
It can be concluded that Calvert is entire once knowing that Anthony is not lively and Blanche is tough.
If all people are not miniscule or versatile, then Kelvin is not lively.
If there is at least one people who is not tough, then Renfred is lively and Shawn is not entire.
If there is someone who is either friendly or not miniscule, then Renfred is not lively.
If someone is both not versatile and friendly, then he is not miniscule.
If someone is versatile and miniscule, then he is lively, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kelvin is not tough once knowing that Renfred is miniscule. | Silas is friendly. | neutral |
Anthony is lively.
Calvert is not versatile.
Anthony is not tough.
Silas is not lively.
Calvert is not entire.
Calvert is not lively.
Renfred is friendly.
Shawn is versatile.
Renfred is not miniscule.
Kelvin is not friendly.
Shawn is friendly.
Kelvin is versatile.If someone is not lively or entire, then he is not tough.
If there is someone who is entire, then Shawn is not lively.
If there is at least one people who is not lively, then Silas is entire.
If Renfred is friendly, then Silas is not entire.
Someone is friendly if and only if he is versatile.
It can be concluded that Calvert is entire once knowing that Anthony is not lively and Blanche is tough.
If all people are not miniscule or versatile, then Kelvin is not lively.
If there is at least one people who is not tough, then Renfred is lively and Shawn is not entire.
If there is someone who is either friendly or not miniscule, then Renfred is not lively.
If someone is both not versatile and friendly, then he is not miniscule.
If someone is versatile and miniscule, then he is lively, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kelvin is not tough once knowing that Renfred is miniscule. | Renfred is friendly. | entailment |
Anthony is lively.
Calvert is not versatile.
Anthony is not tough.
Silas is not lively.
Calvert is not entire.
Calvert is not lively.
Renfred is friendly.
Shawn is versatile.
Renfred is not miniscule.
Kelvin is not friendly.
Shawn is friendly.
Kelvin is versatile.If someone is not lively or entire, then he is not tough.
If there is someone who is entire, then Shawn is not lively.
If there is at least one people who is not lively, then Silas is entire.
If Renfred is friendly, then Silas is not entire.
Someone is friendly if and only if he is versatile.
It can be concluded that Calvert is entire once knowing that Anthony is not lively and Blanche is tough.
If all people are not miniscule or versatile, then Kelvin is not lively.
If there is at least one people who is not tough, then Renfred is lively and Shawn is not entire.
If there is someone who is either friendly or not miniscule, then Renfred is not lively.
If someone is both not versatile and friendly, then he is not miniscule.
If someone is versatile and miniscule, then he is lively, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kelvin is not tough once knowing that Renfred is miniscule. | Blanche is not lively. | neutral |
Anthony is lively.
Calvert is not versatile.
Anthony is not tough.
Silas is not lively.
Calvert is not entire.
Calvert is not lively.
Renfred is friendly.
Shawn is versatile.
Renfred is not miniscule.
Kelvin is not friendly.
Shawn is friendly.
Kelvin is versatile.If someone is not lively or entire, then he is not tough.
If there is someone who is entire, then Shawn is not lively.
If there is at least one people who is not lively, then Silas is entire.
If Renfred is friendly, then Silas is not entire.
Someone is friendly if and only if he is versatile.
It can be concluded that Calvert is entire once knowing that Anthony is not lively and Blanche is tough.
If all people are not miniscule or versatile, then Kelvin is not lively.
If there is at least one people who is not tough, then Renfred is lively and Shawn is not entire.
If there is someone who is either friendly or not miniscule, then Renfred is not lively.
If someone is both not versatile and friendly, then he is not miniscule.
If someone is versatile and miniscule, then he is lively, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kelvin is not tough once knowing that Renfred is miniscule. | Renfred is not lively. | self_contradiction |
Anthony is lively.
Calvert is not versatile.
Anthony is not tough.
Silas is not lively.
Calvert is not entire.
Calvert is not lively.
Renfred is friendly.
Shawn is versatile.
Renfred is not miniscule.
Kelvin is not friendly.
Shawn is friendly.
Kelvin is versatile.If someone is not lively or entire, then he is not tough.
If there is someone who is entire, then Shawn is not lively.
If there is at least one people who is not lively, then Silas is entire.
If Renfred is friendly, then Silas is not entire.
Someone is friendly if and only if he is versatile.
It can be concluded that Calvert is entire once knowing that Anthony is not lively and Blanche is tough.
If all people are not miniscule or versatile, then Kelvin is not lively.
If there is at least one people who is not tough, then Renfred is lively and Shawn is not entire.
If there is someone who is either friendly or not miniscule, then Renfred is not lively.
If someone is both not versatile and friendly, then he is not miniscule.
If someone is versatile and miniscule, then he is lively, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kelvin is not tough once knowing that Renfred is miniscule. | Renfred is not tough. | entailment |
Anthony is lively.
Calvert is not versatile.
Anthony is not tough.
Silas is not lively.
Calvert is not entire.
Calvert is not lively.
Renfred is friendly.
Shawn is versatile.
Renfred is not miniscule.
Kelvin is not friendly.
Shawn is friendly.
Kelvin is versatile.If someone is not lively or entire, then he is not tough.
If there is someone who is entire, then Shawn is not lively.
If there is at least one people who is not lively, then Silas is entire.
If Renfred is friendly, then Silas is not entire.
Someone is friendly if and only if he is versatile.
It can be concluded that Calvert is entire once knowing that Anthony is not lively and Blanche is tough.
If all people are not miniscule or versatile, then Kelvin is not lively.
If there is at least one people who is not tough, then Renfred is lively and Shawn is not entire.
If there is someone who is either friendly or not miniscule, then Renfred is not lively.
If someone is both not versatile and friendly, then he is not miniscule.
If someone is versatile and miniscule, then he is lively, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kelvin is not tough once knowing that Renfred is miniscule. | Anthony is versatile. | entailment |
Anthony is lively.
Calvert is not versatile.
Anthony is not tough.
Silas is not lively.
Calvert is not entire.
Calvert is not lively.
Renfred is friendly.
Shawn is versatile.
Renfred is not miniscule.
Kelvin is not friendly.
Shawn is friendly.
Kelvin is versatile.If someone is not lively or entire, then he is not tough.
If there is someone who is entire, then Shawn is not lively.
If there is at least one people who is not lively, then Silas is entire.
If Renfred is friendly, then Silas is not entire.
Someone is friendly if and only if he is versatile.
It can be concluded that Calvert is entire once knowing that Anthony is not lively and Blanche is tough.
If all people are not miniscule or versatile, then Kelvin is not lively.
If there is at least one people who is not tough, then Renfred is lively and Shawn is not entire.
If there is someone who is either friendly or not miniscule, then Renfred is not lively.
If someone is both not versatile and friendly, then he is not miniscule.
If someone is versatile and miniscule, then he is lively, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kelvin is not tough once knowing that Renfred is miniscule. | Silas is not entire. | self_contradiction |
Anthony is lively.
Calvert is not versatile.
Anthony is not tough.
Silas is not lively.
Calvert is not entire.
Calvert is not lively.
Renfred is friendly.
Shawn is versatile.
Renfred is not miniscule.
Kelvin is not friendly.
Shawn is friendly.
Kelvin is versatile.If someone is not lively or entire, then he is not tough.
If there is someone who is entire, then Shawn is not lively.
If there is at least one people who is not lively, then Silas is entire.
If Renfred is friendly, then Silas is not entire.
Someone is friendly if and only if he is versatile.
It can be concluded that Calvert is entire once knowing that Anthony is not lively and Blanche is tough.
If all people are not miniscule or versatile, then Kelvin is not lively.
If there is at least one people who is not tough, then Renfred is lively and Shawn is not entire.
If there is someone who is either friendly or not miniscule, then Renfred is not lively.
If someone is both not versatile and friendly, then he is not miniscule.
If someone is versatile and miniscule, then he is lively, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kelvin is not tough once knowing that Renfred is miniscule. | Shawn is tough. | contradiction |
Anthony is lively.
Calvert is not versatile.
Anthony is not tough.
Silas is not lively.
Calvert is not entire.
Calvert is not lively.
Renfred is friendly.
Shawn is versatile.
Renfred is not miniscule.
Kelvin is not friendly.
Shawn is friendly.
Kelvin is versatile.If someone is not lively or entire, then he is not tough.
If there is someone who is entire, then Shawn is not lively.
If there is at least one people who is not lively, then Silas is entire.
If Renfred is friendly, then Silas is not entire.
Someone is friendly if and only if he is versatile.
It can be concluded that Calvert is entire once knowing that Anthony is not lively and Blanche is tough.
If all people are not miniscule or versatile, then Kelvin is not lively.
If there is at least one people who is not tough, then Renfred is lively and Shawn is not entire.
If there is someone who is either friendly or not miniscule, then Renfred is not lively.
If someone is both not versatile and friendly, then he is not miniscule.
If someone is versatile and miniscule, then he is lively, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kelvin is not tough once knowing that Renfred is miniscule. | Renfred is miniscule. | self_contradiction |
Anthony is lively.
Calvert is not versatile.
Anthony is not tough.
Silas is not lively.
Calvert is not entire.
Calvert is not lively.
Renfred is friendly.
Shawn is versatile.
Renfred is not miniscule.
Kelvin is not friendly.
Shawn is friendly.
Kelvin is versatile.If someone is not lively or entire, then he is not tough.
If there is someone who is entire, then Shawn is not lively.
If there is at least one people who is not lively, then Silas is entire.
If Renfred is friendly, then Silas is not entire.
Someone is friendly if and only if he is versatile.
It can be concluded that Calvert is entire once knowing that Anthony is not lively and Blanche is tough.
If all people are not miniscule or versatile, then Kelvin is not lively.
If there is at least one people who is not tough, then Renfred is lively and Shawn is not entire.
If there is someone who is either friendly or not miniscule, then Renfred is not lively.
If someone is both not versatile and friendly, then he is not miniscule.
If someone is versatile and miniscule, then he is lively, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kelvin is not tough once knowing that Renfred is miniscule. | Kelvin is not friendly. | self_contradiction |
Anthony is lively.
Calvert is not versatile.
Anthony is not tough.
Silas is not lively.
Calvert is not entire.
Calvert is not lively.
Renfred is friendly.
Shawn is versatile.
Renfred is not miniscule.
Kelvin is not friendly.
Shawn is friendly.
Kelvin is versatile.If someone is not lively or entire, then he is not tough.
If there is someone who is entire, then Shawn is not lively.
If there is at least one people who is not lively, then Silas is entire.
If Renfred is friendly, then Silas is not entire.
Someone is friendly if and only if he is versatile.
It can be concluded that Calvert is entire once knowing that Anthony is not lively and Blanche is tough.
If all people are not miniscule or versatile, then Kelvin is not lively.
If there is at least one people who is not tough, then Renfred is lively and Shawn is not entire.
If there is someone who is either friendly or not miniscule, then Renfred is not lively.
If someone is both not versatile and friendly, then he is not miniscule.
If someone is versatile and miniscule, then he is lively, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kelvin is not tough once knowing that Renfred is miniscule. | Kelvin is friendly. | self_contradiction |
Anthony is lively.
Calvert is not versatile.
Anthony is not tough.
Silas is not lively.
Calvert is not entire.
Calvert is not lively.
Renfred is friendly.
Shawn is versatile.
Renfred is not miniscule.
Kelvin is not friendly.
Shawn is friendly.
Kelvin is versatile.If someone is not lively or entire, then he is not tough.
If there is someone who is entire, then Shawn is not lively.
If there is at least one people who is not lively, then Silas is entire.
If Renfred is friendly, then Silas is not entire.
Someone is friendly if and only if he is versatile.
It can be concluded that Calvert is entire once knowing that Anthony is not lively and Blanche is tough.
If all people are not miniscule or versatile, then Kelvin is not lively.
If there is at least one people who is not tough, then Renfred is lively and Shawn is not entire.
If there is someone who is either friendly or not miniscule, then Renfred is not lively.
If someone is both not versatile and friendly, then he is not miniscule.
If someone is versatile and miniscule, then he is lively, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kelvin is not tough once knowing that Renfred is miniscule. | Renfred is not versatile. | contradiction |
Anthony is lively.
Calvert is not versatile.
Anthony is not tough.
Silas is not lively.
Calvert is not entire.
Calvert is not lively.
Renfred is friendly.
Shawn is versatile.
Renfred is not miniscule.
Kelvin is not friendly.
Shawn is friendly.
Kelvin is versatile.If someone is not lively or entire, then he is not tough.
If there is someone who is entire, then Shawn is not lively.
If there is at least one people who is not lively, then Silas is entire.
If Renfred is friendly, then Silas is not entire.
Someone is friendly if and only if he is versatile.
It can be concluded that Calvert is entire once knowing that Anthony is not lively and Blanche is tough.
If all people are not miniscule or versatile, then Kelvin is not lively.
If there is at least one people who is not tough, then Renfred is lively and Shawn is not entire.
If there is someone who is either friendly or not miniscule, then Renfred is not lively.
If someone is both not versatile and friendly, then he is not miniscule.
If someone is versatile and miniscule, then he is lively, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kelvin is not tough once knowing that Renfred is miniscule. | Shawn is not entire. | entailment |
Anthony is lively.
Calvert is not versatile.
Anthony is not tough.
Silas is not lively.
Calvert is not entire.
Calvert is not lively.
Renfred is friendly.
Shawn is versatile.
Renfred is not miniscule.
Kelvin is not friendly.
Shawn is friendly.
Kelvin is versatile.If someone is not lively or entire, then he is not tough.
If there is someone who is entire, then Shawn is not lively.
If there is at least one people who is not lively, then Silas is entire.
If Renfred is friendly, then Silas is not entire.
Someone is friendly if and only if he is versatile.
It can be concluded that Calvert is entire once knowing that Anthony is not lively and Blanche is tough.
If all people are not miniscule or versatile, then Kelvin is not lively.
If there is at least one people who is not tough, then Renfred is lively and Shawn is not entire.
If there is someone who is either friendly or not miniscule, then Renfred is not lively.
If someone is both not versatile and friendly, then he is not miniscule.
If someone is versatile and miniscule, then he is lively, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kelvin is not tough once knowing that Renfred is miniscule. | Calvert is not lively. | entailment |
Anthony is lively.
Calvert is not versatile.
Anthony is not tough.
Silas is not lively.
Calvert is not entire.
Calvert is not lively.
Renfred is friendly.
Shawn is versatile.
Renfred is not miniscule.
Kelvin is not friendly.
Shawn is friendly.
Kelvin is versatile.If someone is not lively or entire, then he is not tough.
If there is someone who is entire, then Shawn is not lively.
If there is at least one people who is not lively, then Silas is entire.
If Renfred is friendly, then Silas is not entire.
Someone is friendly if and only if he is versatile.
It can be concluded that Calvert is entire once knowing that Anthony is not lively and Blanche is tough.
If all people are not miniscule or versatile, then Kelvin is not lively.
If there is at least one people who is not tough, then Renfred is lively and Shawn is not entire.
If there is someone who is either friendly or not miniscule, then Renfred is not lively.
If someone is both not versatile and friendly, then he is not miniscule.
If someone is versatile and miniscule, then he is lively, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kelvin is not tough once knowing that Renfred is miniscule. | Anthony is tough. | contradiction |
Anthony is lively.
Calvert is not versatile.
Anthony is not tough.
Silas is not lively.
Calvert is not entire.
Calvert is not lively.
Renfred is friendly.
Shawn is versatile.
Renfred is not miniscule.
Kelvin is not friendly.
Shawn is friendly.
Kelvin is versatile.If someone is not lively or entire, then he is not tough.
If there is someone who is entire, then Shawn is not lively.
If there is at least one people who is not lively, then Silas is entire.
If Renfred is friendly, then Silas is not entire.
Someone is friendly if and only if he is versatile.
It can be concluded that Calvert is entire once knowing that Anthony is not lively and Blanche is tough.
If all people are not miniscule or versatile, then Kelvin is not lively.
If there is at least one people who is not tough, then Renfred is lively and Shawn is not entire.
If there is someone who is either friendly or not miniscule, then Renfred is not lively.
If someone is both not versatile and friendly, then he is not miniscule.
If someone is versatile and miniscule, then he is lively, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kelvin is not tough once knowing that Renfred is miniscule. | Blanche is not miniscule. | neutral |
Anthony is lively.
Calvert is not versatile.
Anthony is not tough.
Silas is not lively.
Calvert is not entire.
Calvert is not lively.
Renfred is friendly.
Shawn is versatile.
Renfred is not miniscule.
Kelvin is not friendly.
Shawn is friendly.
Kelvin is versatile.If someone is not lively or entire, then he is not tough.
If there is someone who is entire, then Shawn is not lively.
If there is at least one people who is not lively, then Silas is entire.
If Renfred is friendly, then Silas is not entire.
Someone is friendly if and only if he is versatile.
It can be concluded that Calvert is entire once knowing that Anthony is not lively and Blanche is tough.
If all people are not miniscule or versatile, then Kelvin is not lively.
If there is at least one people who is not tough, then Renfred is lively and Shawn is not entire.
If there is someone who is either friendly or not miniscule, then Renfred is not lively.
If someone is both not versatile and friendly, then he is not miniscule.
If someone is versatile and miniscule, then he is lively, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kelvin is not tough once knowing that Renfred is miniscule. | Blanche is not versatile. | neutral |
Anthony is lively.
Calvert is not versatile.
Anthony is not tough.
Silas is not lively.
Calvert is not entire.
Calvert is not lively.
Renfred is friendly.
Shawn is versatile.
Renfred is not miniscule.
Kelvin is not friendly.
Shawn is friendly.
Kelvin is versatile.If someone is not lively or entire, then he is not tough.
If there is someone who is entire, then Shawn is not lively.
If there is at least one people who is not lively, then Silas is entire.
If Renfred is friendly, then Silas is not entire.
Someone is friendly if and only if he is versatile.
It can be concluded that Calvert is entire once knowing that Anthony is not lively and Blanche is tough.
If all people are not miniscule or versatile, then Kelvin is not lively.
If there is at least one people who is not tough, then Renfred is lively and Shawn is not entire.
If there is someone who is either friendly or not miniscule, then Renfred is not lively.
If someone is both not versatile and friendly, then he is not miniscule.
If someone is versatile and miniscule, then he is lively, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kelvin is not tough once knowing that Renfred is miniscule. | Shawn is entire. | contradiction |
Ron is not excited.
Melville is not shiny.
Monique is not shiny.
Ron is not shiny.
Lee is not sharp.
Ron is sharp.
Lee is shiny.
Lee is not excited.
Arvel is shiny.
Arvel is serious.
Melville is thoughtless.
Alastair is not fuzzy.Someone is not serious and not sharp if and only if he is shiny.
If there is nobody who is not excited, then Lee is not sharp and Arvel is fuzzy.
If there is someone who is either not fuzzy or thoughtless, then Alastair is not sharp.
Ron being thoughtless is equivalent to Lee being fuzzy and Lee being not serious.
If someone is not serious or he is not thoughtless, then he is not excited.
Someone who is both sharp and shiny is always not thoughtless.
It can be concluded that Alastair is not excited and Jeremiah is not thoughtless once knowing that Melville is shiny.
If someone is thoughtless, then he is not fuzzy.
If there is at least one people who is sharp, then Ron is shiny and Jeremiah is fuzzy.
If there is at least one people who is not fuzzy or not excited, then Lee is thoughtless.
If someone is not thoughtless and not shiny, then he is both fuzzy and excited, and vice versa.
If all people are sharp or thoughtless, then Melville is serious. | Ron is not sharp. | self_contradiction |
Ron is not excited.
Melville is not shiny.
Monique is not shiny.
Ron is not shiny.
Lee is not sharp.
Ron is sharp.
Lee is shiny.
Lee is not excited.
Arvel is shiny.
Arvel is serious.
Melville is thoughtless.
Alastair is not fuzzy.Someone is not serious and not sharp if and only if he is shiny.
If there is nobody who is not excited, then Lee is not sharp and Arvel is fuzzy.
If there is someone who is either not fuzzy or thoughtless, then Alastair is not sharp.
Ron being thoughtless is equivalent to Lee being fuzzy and Lee being not serious.
If someone is not serious or he is not thoughtless, then he is not excited.
Someone who is both sharp and shiny is always not thoughtless.
It can be concluded that Alastair is not excited and Jeremiah is not thoughtless once knowing that Melville is shiny.
If someone is thoughtless, then he is not fuzzy.
If there is at least one people who is sharp, then Ron is shiny and Jeremiah is fuzzy.
If there is at least one people who is not fuzzy or not excited, then Lee is thoughtless.
If someone is not thoughtless and not shiny, then he is both fuzzy and excited, and vice versa.
If all people are sharp or thoughtless, then Melville is serious. | Melville is fuzzy. | contradiction |
Ron is not excited.
Melville is not shiny.
Monique is not shiny.
Ron is not shiny.
Lee is not sharp.
Ron is sharp.
Lee is shiny.
Lee is not excited.
Arvel is shiny.
Arvel is serious.
Melville is thoughtless.
Alastair is not fuzzy.Someone is not serious and not sharp if and only if he is shiny.
If there is nobody who is not excited, then Lee is not sharp and Arvel is fuzzy.
If there is someone who is either not fuzzy or thoughtless, then Alastair is not sharp.
Ron being thoughtless is equivalent to Lee being fuzzy and Lee being not serious.
If someone is not serious or he is not thoughtless, then he is not excited.
Someone who is both sharp and shiny is always not thoughtless.
It can be concluded that Alastair is not excited and Jeremiah is not thoughtless once knowing that Melville is shiny.
If someone is thoughtless, then he is not fuzzy.
If there is at least one people who is sharp, then Ron is shiny and Jeremiah is fuzzy.
If there is at least one people who is not fuzzy or not excited, then Lee is thoughtless.
If someone is not thoughtless and not shiny, then he is both fuzzy and excited, and vice versa.
If all people are sharp or thoughtless, then Melville is serious. | Alastair is sharp. | contradiction |
Ron is not excited.
Melville is not shiny.
Monique is not shiny.
Ron is not shiny.
Lee is not sharp.
Ron is sharp.
Lee is shiny.
Lee is not excited.
Arvel is shiny.
Arvel is serious.
Melville is thoughtless.
Alastair is not fuzzy.Someone is not serious and not sharp if and only if he is shiny.
If there is nobody who is not excited, then Lee is not sharp and Arvel is fuzzy.
If there is someone who is either not fuzzy or thoughtless, then Alastair is not sharp.
Ron being thoughtless is equivalent to Lee being fuzzy and Lee being not serious.
If someone is not serious or he is not thoughtless, then he is not excited.
Someone who is both sharp and shiny is always not thoughtless.
It can be concluded that Alastair is not excited and Jeremiah is not thoughtless once knowing that Melville is shiny.
If someone is thoughtless, then he is not fuzzy.
If there is at least one people who is sharp, then Ron is shiny and Jeremiah is fuzzy.
If there is at least one people who is not fuzzy or not excited, then Lee is thoughtless.
If someone is not thoughtless and not shiny, then he is both fuzzy and excited, and vice versa.
If all people are sharp or thoughtless, then Melville is serious. | Melville is not fuzzy. | entailment |
Ron is not excited.
Melville is not shiny.
Monique is not shiny.
Ron is not shiny.
Lee is not sharp.
Ron is sharp.
Lee is shiny.
Lee is not excited.
Arvel is shiny.
Arvel is serious.
Melville is thoughtless.
Alastair is not fuzzy.Someone is not serious and not sharp if and only if he is shiny.
If there is nobody who is not excited, then Lee is not sharp and Arvel is fuzzy.
If there is someone who is either not fuzzy or thoughtless, then Alastair is not sharp.
Ron being thoughtless is equivalent to Lee being fuzzy and Lee being not serious.
If someone is not serious or he is not thoughtless, then he is not excited.
Someone who is both sharp and shiny is always not thoughtless.
It can be concluded that Alastair is not excited and Jeremiah is not thoughtless once knowing that Melville is shiny.
If someone is thoughtless, then he is not fuzzy.
If there is at least one people who is sharp, then Ron is shiny and Jeremiah is fuzzy.
If there is at least one people who is not fuzzy or not excited, then Lee is thoughtless.
If someone is not thoughtless and not shiny, then he is both fuzzy and excited, and vice versa.
If all people are sharp or thoughtless, then Melville is serious. | Arvel is thoughtless. | neutral |
Ron is not excited.
Melville is not shiny.
Monique is not shiny.
Ron is not shiny.
Lee is not sharp.
Ron is sharp.
Lee is shiny.
Lee is not excited.
Arvel is shiny.
Arvel is serious.
Melville is thoughtless.
Alastair is not fuzzy.Someone is not serious and not sharp if and only if he is shiny.
If there is nobody who is not excited, then Lee is not sharp and Arvel is fuzzy.
If there is someone who is either not fuzzy or thoughtless, then Alastair is not sharp.
Ron being thoughtless is equivalent to Lee being fuzzy and Lee being not serious.
If someone is not serious or he is not thoughtless, then he is not excited.
Someone who is both sharp and shiny is always not thoughtless.
It can be concluded that Alastair is not excited and Jeremiah is not thoughtless once knowing that Melville is shiny.
If someone is thoughtless, then he is not fuzzy.
If there is at least one people who is sharp, then Ron is shiny and Jeremiah is fuzzy.
If there is at least one people who is not fuzzy or not excited, then Lee is thoughtless.
If someone is not thoughtless and not shiny, then he is both fuzzy and excited, and vice versa.
If all people are sharp or thoughtless, then Melville is serious. | Ron is sharp. | self_contradiction |
Ron is not excited.
Melville is not shiny.
Monique is not shiny.
Ron is not shiny.
Lee is not sharp.
Ron is sharp.
Lee is shiny.
Lee is not excited.
Arvel is shiny.
Arvel is serious.
Melville is thoughtless.
Alastair is not fuzzy.Someone is not serious and not sharp if and only if he is shiny.
If there is nobody who is not excited, then Lee is not sharp and Arvel is fuzzy.
If there is someone who is either not fuzzy or thoughtless, then Alastair is not sharp.
Ron being thoughtless is equivalent to Lee being fuzzy and Lee being not serious.
If someone is not serious or he is not thoughtless, then he is not excited.
Someone who is both sharp and shiny is always not thoughtless.
It can be concluded that Alastair is not excited and Jeremiah is not thoughtless once knowing that Melville is shiny.
If someone is thoughtless, then he is not fuzzy.
If there is at least one people who is sharp, then Ron is shiny and Jeremiah is fuzzy.
If there is at least one people who is not fuzzy or not excited, then Lee is thoughtless.
If someone is not thoughtless and not shiny, then he is both fuzzy and excited, and vice versa.
If all people are sharp or thoughtless, then Melville is serious. | Ron is excited. | self_contradiction |
Ron is not excited.
Melville is not shiny.
Monique is not shiny.
Ron is not shiny.
Lee is not sharp.
Ron is sharp.
Lee is shiny.
Lee is not excited.
Arvel is shiny.
Arvel is serious.
Melville is thoughtless.
Alastair is not fuzzy.Someone is not serious and not sharp if and only if he is shiny.
If there is nobody who is not excited, then Lee is not sharp and Arvel is fuzzy.
If there is someone who is either not fuzzy or thoughtless, then Alastair is not sharp.
Ron being thoughtless is equivalent to Lee being fuzzy and Lee being not serious.
If someone is not serious or he is not thoughtless, then he is not excited.
Someone who is both sharp and shiny is always not thoughtless.
It can be concluded that Alastair is not excited and Jeremiah is not thoughtless once knowing that Melville is shiny.
If someone is thoughtless, then he is not fuzzy.
If there is at least one people who is sharp, then Ron is shiny and Jeremiah is fuzzy.
If there is at least one people who is not fuzzy or not excited, then Lee is thoughtless.
If someone is not thoughtless and not shiny, then he is both fuzzy and excited, and vice versa.
If all people are sharp or thoughtless, then Melville is serious. | Arvel is not thoughtless. | neutral |
Ron is not excited.
Melville is not shiny.
Monique is not shiny.
Ron is not shiny.
Lee is not sharp.
Ron is sharp.
Lee is shiny.
Lee is not excited.
Arvel is shiny.
Arvel is serious.
Melville is thoughtless.
Alastair is not fuzzy.Someone is not serious and not sharp if and only if he is shiny.
If there is nobody who is not excited, then Lee is not sharp and Arvel is fuzzy.
If there is someone who is either not fuzzy or thoughtless, then Alastair is not sharp.
Ron being thoughtless is equivalent to Lee being fuzzy and Lee being not serious.
If someone is not serious or he is not thoughtless, then he is not excited.
Someone who is both sharp and shiny is always not thoughtless.
It can be concluded that Alastair is not excited and Jeremiah is not thoughtless once knowing that Melville is shiny.
If someone is thoughtless, then he is not fuzzy.
If there is at least one people who is sharp, then Ron is shiny and Jeremiah is fuzzy.
If there is at least one people who is not fuzzy or not excited, then Lee is thoughtless.
If someone is not thoughtless and not shiny, then he is both fuzzy and excited, and vice versa.
If all people are sharp or thoughtless, then Melville is serious. | Ron is shiny. | self_contradiction |
Ron is not excited.
Melville is not shiny.
Monique is not shiny.
Ron is not shiny.
Lee is not sharp.
Ron is sharp.
Lee is shiny.
Lee is not excited.
Arvel is shiny.
Arvel is serious.
Melville is thoughtless.
Alastair is not fuzzy.Someone is not serious and not sharp if and only if he is shiny.
If there is nobody who is not excited, then Lee is not sharp and Arvel is fuzzy.
If there is someone who is either not fuzzy or thoughtless, then Alastair is not sharp.
Ron being thoughtless is equivalent to Lee being fuzzy and Lee being not serious.
If someone is not serious or he is not thoughtless, then he is not excited.
Someone who is both sharp and shiny is always not thoughtless.
It can be concluded that Alastair is not excited and Jeremiah is not thoughtless once knowing that Melville is shiny.
If someone is thoughtless, then he is not fuzzy.
If there is at least one people who is sharp, then Ron is shiny and Jeremiah is fuzzy.
If there is at least one people who is not fuzzy or not excited, then Lee is thoughtless.
If someone is not thoughtless and not shiny, then he is both fuzzy and excited, and vice versa.
If all people are sharp or thoughtless, then Melville is serious. | Arvel is serious. | self_contradiction |
Ron is not excited.
Melville is not shiny.
Monique is not shiny.
Ron is not shiny.
Lee is not sharp.
Ron is sharp.
Lee is shiny.
Lee is not excited.
Arvel is shiny.
Arvel is serious.
Melville is thoughtless.
Alastair is not fuzzy.Someone is not serious and not sharp if and only if he is shiny.
If there is nobody who is not excited, then Lee is not sharp and Arvel is fuzzy.
If there is someone who is either not fuzzy or thoughtless, then Alastair is not sharp.
Ron being thoughtless is equivalent to Lee being fuzzy and Lee being not serious.
If someone is not serious or he is not thoughtless, then he is not excited.
Someone who is both sharp and shiny is always not thoughtless.
It can be concluded that Alastair is not excited and Jeremiah is not thoughtless once knowing that Melville is shiny.
If someone is thoughtless, then he is not fuzzy.
If there is at least one people who is sharp, then Ron is shiny and Jeremiah is fuzzy.
If there is at least one people who is not fuzzy or not excited, then Lee is thoughtless.
If someone is not thoughtless and not shiny, then he is both fuzzy and excited, and vice versa.
If all people are sharp or thoughtless, then Melville is serious. | Ron is not serious. | entailment |
Ron is not excited.
Melville is not shiny.
Monique is not shiny.
Ron is not shiny.
Lee is not sharp.
Ron is sharp.
Lee is shiny.
Lee is not excited.
Arvel is shiny.
Arvel is serious.
Melville is thoughtless.
Alastair is not fuzzy.Someone is not serious and not sharp if and only if he is shiny.
If there is nobody who is not excited, then Lee is not sharp and Arvel is fuzzy.
If there is someone who is either not fuzzy or thoughtless, then Alastair is not sharp.
Ron being thoughtless is equivalent to Lee being fuzzy and Lee being not serious.
If someone is not serious or he is not thoughtless, then he is not excited.
Someone who is both sharp and shiny is always not thoughtless.
It can be concluded that Alastair is not excited and Jeremiah is not thoughtless once knowing that Melville is shiny.
If someone is thoughtless, then he is not fuzzy.
If there is at least one people who is sharp, then Ron is shiny and Jeremiah is fuzzy.
If there is at least one people who is not fuzzy or not excited, then Lee is thoughtless.
If someone is not thoughtless and not shiny, then he is both fuzzy and excited, and vice versa.
If all people are sharp or thoughtless, then Melville is serious. | Arvel is sharp. | contradiction |
Ron is not excited.
Melville is not shiny.
Monique is not shiny.
Ron is not shiny.
Lee is not sharp.
Ron is sharp.
Lee is shiny.
Lee is not excited.
Arvel is shiny.
Arvel is serious.
Melville is thoughtless.
Alastair is not fuzzy.Someone is not serious and not sharp if and only if he is shiny.
If there is nobody who is not excited, then Lee is not sharp and Arvel is fuzzy.
If there is someone who is either not fuzzy or thoughtless, then Alastair is not sharp.
Ron being thoughtless is equivalent to Lee being fuzzy and Lee being not serious.
If someone is not serious or he is not thoughtless, then he is not excited.
Someone who is both sharp and shiny is always not thoughtless.
It can be concluded that Alastair is not excited and Jeremiah is not thoughtless once knowing that Melville is shiny.
If someone is thoughtless, then he is not fuzzy.
If there is at least one people who is sharp, then Ron is shiny and Jeremiah is fuzzy.
If there is at least one people who is not fuzzy or not excited, then Lee is thoughtless.
If someone is not thoughtless and not shiny, then he is both fuzzy and excited, and vice versa.
If all people are sharp or thoughtless, then Melville is serious. | Lee is not excited. | entailment |
Ron is not excited.
Melville is not shiny.
Monique is not shiny.
Ron is not shiny.
Lee is not sharp.
Ron is sharp.
Lee is shiny.
Lee is not excited.
Arvel is shiny.
Arvel is serious.
Melville is thoughtless.
Alastair is not fuzzy.Someone is not serious and not sharp if and only if he is shiny.
If there is nobody who is not excited, then Lee is not sharp and Arvel is fuzzy.
If there is someone who is either not fuzzy or thoughtless, then Alastair is not sharp.
Ron being thoughtless is equivalent to Lee being fuzzy and Lee being not serious.
If someone is not serious or he is not thoughtless, then he is not excited.
Someone who is both sharp and shiny is always not thoughtless.
It can be concluded that Alastair is not excited and Jeremiah is not thoughtless once knowing that Melville is shiny.
If someone is thoughtless, then he is not fuzzy.
If there is at least one people who is sharp, then Ron is shiny and Jeremiah is fuzzy.
If there is at least one people who is not fuzzy or not excited, then Lee is thoughtless.
If someone is not thoughtless and not shiny, then he is both fuzzy and excited, and vice versa.
If all people are sharp or thoughtless, then Melville is serious. | Lee is not shiny. | contradiction |
Ron is not excited.
Melville is not shiny.
Monique is not shiny.
Ron is not shiny.
Lee is not sharp.
Ron is sharp.
Lee is shiny.
Lee is not excited.
Arvel is shiny.
Arvel is serious.
Melville is thoughtless.
Alastair is not fuzzy.Someone is not serious and not sharp if and only if he is shiny.
If there is nobody who is not excited, then Lee is not sharp and Arvel is fuzzy.
If there is someone who is either not fuzzy or thoughtless, then Alastair is not sharp.
Ron being thoughtless is equivalent to Lee being fuzzy and Lee being not serious.
If someone is not serious or he is not thoughtless, then he is not excited.
Someone who is both sharp and shiny is always not thoughtless.
It can be concluded that Alastair is not excited and Jeremiah is not thoughtless once knowing that Melville is shiny.
If someone is thoughtless, then he is not fuzzy.
If there is at least one people who is sharp, then Ron is shiny and Jeremiah is fuzzy.
If there is at least one people who is not fuzzy or not excited, then Lee is thoughtless.
If someone is not thoughtless and not shiny, then he is both fuzzy and excited, and vice versa.
If all people are sharp or thoughtless, then Melville is serious. | Monique is excited. | neutral |
Ron is not excited.
Melville is not shiny.
Monique is not shiny.
Ron is not shiny.
Lee is not sharp.
Ron is sharp.
Lee is shiny.
Lee is not excited.
Arvel is shiny.
Arvel is serious.
Melville is thoughtless.
Alastair is not fuzzy.Someone is not serious and not sharp if and only if he is shiny.
If there is nobody who is not excited, then Lee is not sharp and Arvel is fuzzy.
If there is someone who is either not fuzzy or thoughtless, then Alastair is not sharp.
Ron being thoughtless is equivalent to Lee being fuzzy and Lee being not serious.
If someone is not serious or he is not thoughtless, then he is not excited.
Someone who is both sharp and shiny is always not thoughtless.
It can be concluded that Alastair is not excited and Jeremiah is not thoughtless once knowing that Melville is shiny.
If someone is thoughtless, then he is not fuzzy.
If there is at least one people who is sharp, then Ron is shiny and Jeremiah is fuzzy.
If there is at least one people who is not fuzzy or not excited, then Lee is thoughtless.
If someone is not thoughtless and not shiny, then he is both fuzzy and excited, and vice versa.
If all people are sharp or thoughtless, then Melville is serious. | Monique is not shiny. | entailment |
Ron is not excited.
Melville is not shiny.
Monique is not shiny.
Ron is not shiny.
Lee is not sharp.
Ron is sharp.
Lee is shiny.
Lee is not excited.
Arvel is shiny.
Arvel is serious.
Melville is thoughtless.
Alastair is not fuzzy.Someone is not serious and not sharp if and only if he is shiny.
If there is nobody who is not excited, then Lee is not sharp and Arvel is fuzzy.
If there is someone who is either not fuzzy or thoughtless, then Alastair is not sharp.
Ron being thoughtless is equivalent to Lee being fuzzy and Lee being not serious.
If someone is not serious or he is not thoughtless, then he is not excited.
Someone who is both sharp and shiny is always not thoughtless.
It can be concluded that Alastair is not excited and Jeremiah is not thoughtless once knowing that Melville is shiny.
If someone is thoughtless, then he is not fuzzy.
If there is at least one people who is sharp, then Ron is shiny and Jeremiah is fuzzy.
If there is at least one people who is not fuzzy or not excited, then Lee is thoughtless.
If someone is not thoughtless and not shiny, then he is both fuzzy and excited, and vice versa.
If all people are sharp or thoughtless, then Melville is serious. | Melville is serious. | neutral |
Ron is not excited.
Melville is not shiny.
Monique is not shiny.
Ron is not shiny.
Lee is not sharp.
Ron is sharp.
Lee is shiny.
Lee is not excited.
Arvel is shiny.
Arvel is serious.
Melville is thoughtless.
Alastair is not fuzzy.Someone is not serious and not sharp if and only if he is shiny.
If there is nobody who is not excited, then Lee is not sharp and Arvel is fuzzy.
If there is someone who is either not fuzzy or thoughtless, then Alastair is not sharp.
Ron being thoughtless is equivalent to Lee being fuzzy and Lee being not serious.
If someone is not serious or he is not thoughtless, then he is not excited.
Someone who is both sharp and shiny is always not thoughtless.
It can be concluded that Alastair is not excited and Jeremiah is not thoughtless once knowing that Melville is shiny.
If someone is thoughtless, then he is not fuzzy.
If there is at least one people who is sharp, then Ron is shiny and Jeremiah is fuzzy.
If there is at least one people who is not fuzzy or not excited, then Lee is thoughtless.
If someone is not thoughtless and not shiny, then he is both fuzzy and excited, and vice versa.
If all people are sharp or thoughtless, then Melville is serious. | Alastair is fuzzy. | contradiction |
Ron is not excited.
Melville is not shiny.
Monique is not shiny.
Ron is not shiny.
Lee is not sharp.
Ron is sharp.
Lee is shiny.
Lee is not excited.
Arvel is shiny.
Arvel is serious.
Melville is thoughtless.
Alastair is not fuzzy.Someone is not serious and not sharp if and only if he is shiny.
If there is nobody who is not excited, then Lee is not sharp and Arvel is fuzzy.
If there is someone who is either not fuzzy or thoughtless, then Alastair is not sharp.
Ron being thoughtless is equivalent to Lee being fuzzy and Lee being not serious.
If someone is not serious or he is not thoughtless, then he is not excited.
Someone who is both sharp and shiny is always not thoughtless.
It can be concluded that Alastair is not excited and Jeremiah is not thoughtless once knowing that Melville is shiny.
If someone is thoughtless, then he is not fuzzy.
If there is at least one people who is sharp, then Ron is shiny and Jeremiah is fuzzy.
If there is at least one people who is not fuzzy or not excited, then Lee is thoughtless.
If someone is not thoughtless and not shiny, then he is both fuzzy and excited, and vice versa.
If all people are sharp or thoughtless, then Melville is serious. | Alastair is excited. | neutral |
Ron is not excited.
Melville is not shiny.
Monique is not shiny.
Ron is not shiny.
Lee is not sharp.
Ron is sharp.
Lee is shiny.
Lee is not excited.
Arvel is shiny.
Arvel is serious.
Melville is thoughtless.
Alastair is not fuzzy.Someone is not serious and not sharp if and only if he is shiny.
If there is nobody who is not excited, then Lee is not sharp and Arvel is fuzzy.
If there is someone who is either not fuzzy or thoughtless, then Alastair is not sharp.
Ron being thoughtless is equivalent to Lee being fuzzy and Lee being not serious.
If someone is not serious or he is not thoughtless, then he is not excited.
Someone who is both sharp and shiny is always not thoughtless.
It can be concluded that Alastair is not excited and Jeremiah is not thoughtless once knowing that Melville is shiny.
If someone is thoughtless, then he is not fuzzy.
If there is at least one people who is sharp, then Ron is shiny and Jeremiah is fuzzy.
If there is at least one people who is not fuzzy or not excited, then Lee is thoughtless.
If someone is not thoughtless and not shiny, then he is both fuzzy and excited, and vice versa.
If all people are sharp or thoughtless, then Melville is serious. | Lee is not serious. | entailment |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.