premise
stringlengths
923
1.41k
hypothesis
stringlengths
11
33
label
stringclasses
4 values
Jessie is not angry. Barclay is not repulsive. Jessie is not repulsive. Andrew is not repulsive. Carlos is repulsive. Theobold is angry. Jessie is hard-working. Camille is blue. Carlos is not clever. Theobold is not wooden. Theobold is not clever. Andrew is not wooden.If Barclay is not blue, then Jessie is wooden, and vice versa. Someone being both angry and clever is equivalent to being not repulsive and wooden. If there is someone who is both clever and not blue, then Jessie is not hard-working. If there is someone who is angry, then Carlos is wooden. If someone is clever, then he is both angry and not repulsive. If there is someone who is blue, then Theobold is wooden and Andrew is hard-working. If there is someone who is either hard-working or blue, then Jessie is wooden. If there is someone who is both hard-working and not angry, then Alastair is not wooden. Someone being not wooden is equivalent to being clever. All hard-working people are repulsive. If all people are not angry or not repulsive, then Carlos is hard-working. Barclay being not repulsive implies that Theobold is blue and Alastair is clever.
Andrew is not angry.
contradiction
Jessie is not angry. Barclay is not repulsive. Jessie is not repulsive. Andrew is not repulsive. Carlos is repulsive. Theobold is angry. Jessie is hard-working. Camille is blue. Carlos is not clever. Theobold is not wooden. Theobold is not clever. Andrew is not wooden.If Barclay is not blue, then Jessie is wooden, and vice versa. Someone being both angry and clever is equivalent to being not repulsive and wooden. If there is someone who is both clever and not blue, then Jessie is not hard-working. If there is someone who is angry, then Carlos is wooden. If someone is clever, then he is both angry and not repulsive. If there is someone who is blue, then Theobold is wooden and Andrew is hard-working. If there is someone who is either hard-working or blue, then Jessie is wooden. If there is someone who is both hard-working and not angry, then Alastair is not wooden. Someone being not wooden is equivalent to being clever. All hard-working people are repulsive. If all people are not angry or not repulsive, then Carlos is hard-working. Barclay being not repulsive implies that Theobold is blue and Alastair is clever.
Alastair is not repulsive.
entailment
Jessie is not angry. Barclay is not repulsive. Jessie is not repulsive. Andrew is not repulsive. Carlos is repulsive. Theobold is angry. Jessie is hard-working. Camille is blue. Carlos is not clever. Theobold is not wooden. Theobold is not clever. Andrew is not wooden.If Barclay is not blue, then Jessie is wooden, and vice versa. Someone being both angry and clever is equivalent to being not repulsive and wooden. If there is someone who is both clever and not blue, then Jessie is not hard-working. If there is someone who is angry, then Carlos is wooden. If someone is clever, then he is both angry and not repulsive. If there is someone who is blue, then Theobold is wooden and Andrew is hard-working. If there is someone who is either hard-working or blue, then Jessie is wooden. If there is someone who is both hard-working and not angry, then Alastair is not wooden. Someone being not wooden is equivalent to being clever. All hard-working people are repulsive. If all people are not angry or not repulsive, then Carlos is hard-working. Barclay being not repulsive implies that Theobold is blue and Alastair is clever.
Barclay is angry.
neutral
Jessie is not angry. Barclay is not repulsive. Jessie is not repulsive. Andrew is not repulsive. Carlos is repulsive. Theobold is angry. Jessie is hard-working. Camille is blue. Carlos is not clever. Theobold is not wooden. Theobold is not clever. Andrew is not wooden.If Barclay is not blue, then Jessie is wooden, and vice versa. Someone being both angry and clever is equivalent to being not repulsive and wooden. If there is someone who is both clever and not blue, then Jessie is not hard-working. If there is someone who is angry, then Carlos is wooden. If someone is clever, then he is both angry and not repulsive. If there is someone who is blue, then Theobold is wooden and Andrew is hard-working. If there is someone who is either hard-working or blue, then Jessie is wooden. If there is someone who is both hard-working and not angry, then Alastair is not wooden. Someone being not wooden is equivalent to being clever. All hard-working people are repulsive. If all people are not angry or not repulsive, then Carlos is hard-working. Barclay being not repulsive implies that Theobold is blue and Alastair is clever.
Alastair is repulsive.
contradiction
Jessie is not angry. Barclay is not repulsive. Jessie is not repulsive. Andrew is not repulsive. Carlos is repulsive. Theobold is angry. Jessie is hard-working. Camille is blue. Carlos is not clever. Theobold is not wooden. Theobold is not clever. Andrew is not wooden.If Barclay is not blue, then Jessie is wooden, and vice versa. Someone being both angry and clever is equivalent to being not repulsive and wooden. If there is someone who is both clever and not blue, then Jessie is not hard-working. If there is someone who is angry, then Carlos is wooden. If someone is clever, then he is both angry and not repulsive. If there is someone who is blue, then Theobold is wooden and Andrew is hard-working. If there is someone who is either hard-working or blue, then Jessie is wooden. If there is someone who is both hard-working and not angry, then Alastair is not wooden. Someone being not wooden is equivalent to being clever. All hard-working people are repulsive. If all people are not angry or not repulsive, then Carlos is hard-working. Barclay being not repulsive implies that Theobold is blue and Alastair is clever.
Theobold is not repulsive.
entailment
Jessie is not angry. Barclay is not repulsive. Jessie is not repulsive. Andrew is not repulsive. Carlos is repulsive. Theobold is angry. Jessie is hard-working. Camille is blue. Carlos is not clever. Theobold is not wooden. Theobold is not clever. Andrew is not wooden.If Barclay is not blue, then Jessie is wooden, and vice versa. Someone being both angry and clever is equivalent to being not repulsive and wooden. If there is someone who is both clever and not blue, then Jessie is not hard-working. If there is someone who is angry, then Carlos is wooden. If someone is clever, then he is both angry and not repulsive. If there is someone who is blue, then Theobold is wooden and Andrew is hard-working. If there is someone who is either hard-working or blue, then Jessie is wooden. If there is someone who is both hard-working and not angry, then Alastair is not wooden. Someone being not wooden is equivalent to being clever. All hard-working people are repulsive. If all people are not angry or not repulsive, then Carlos is hard-working. Barclay being not repulsive implies that Theobold is blue and Alastair is clever.
Carlos is not wooden.
contradiction
Jessie is not angry. Barclay is not repulsive. Jessie is not repulsive. Andrew is not repulsive. Carlos is repulsive. Theobold is angry. Jessie is hard-working. Camille is blue. Carlos is not clever. Theobold is not wooden. Theobold is not clever. Andrew is not wooden.If Barclay is not blue, then Jessie is wooden, and vice versa. Someone being both angry and clever is equivalent to being not repulsive and wooden. If there is someone who is both clever and not blue, then Jessie is not hard-working. If there is someone who is angry, then Carlos is wooden. If someone is clever, then he is both angry and not repulsive. If there is someone who is blue, then Theobold is wooden and Andrew is hard-working. If there is someone who is either hard-working or blue, then Jessie is wooden. If there is someone who is both hard-working and not angry, then Alastair is not wooden. Someone being not wooden is equivalent to being clever. All hard-working people are repulsive. If all people are not angry or not repulsive, then Carlos is hard-working. Barclay being not repulsive implies that Theobold is blue and Alastair is clever.
Jessie is not wooden.
self_contradiction
Jessie is not angry. Barclay is not repulsive. Jessie is not repulsive. Andrew is not repulsive. Carlos is repulsive. Theobold is angry. Jessie is hard-working. Camille is blue. Carlos is not clever. Theobold is not wooden. Theobold is not clever. Andrew is not wooden.If Barclay is not blue, then Jessie is wooden, and vice versa. Someone being both angry and clever is equivalent to being not repulsive and wooden. If there is someone who is both clever and not blue, then Jessie is not hard-working. If there is someone who is angry, then Carlos is wooden. If someone is clever, then he is both angry and not repulsive. If there is someone who is blue, then Theobold is wooden and Andrew is hard-working. If there is someone who is either hard-working or blue, then Jessie is wooden. If there is someone who is both hard-working and not angry, then Alastair is not wooden. Someone being not wooden is equivalent to being clever. All hard-working people are repulsive. If all people are not angry or not repulsive, then Carlos is hard-working. Barclay being not repulsive implies that Theobold is blue and Alastair is clever.
Andrew is not repulsive.
self_contradiction
Jessie is not angry. Barclay is not repulsive. Jessie is not repulsive. Andrew is not repulsive. Carlos is repulsive. Theobold is angry. Jessie is hard-working. Camille is blue. Carlos is not clever. Theobold is not wooden. Theobold is not clever. Andrew is not wooden.If Barclay is not blue, then Jessie is wooden, and vice versa. Someone being both angry and clever is equivalent to being not repulsive and wooden. If there is someone who is both clever and not blue, then Jessie is not hard-working. If there is someone who is angry, then Carlos is wooden. If someone is clever, then he is both angry and not repulsive. If there is someone who is blue, then Theobold is wooden and Andrew is hard-working. If there is someone who is either hard-working or blue, then Jessie is wooden. If there is someone who is both hard-working and not angry, then Alastair is not wooden. Someone being not wooden is equivalent to being clever. All hard-working people are repulsive. If all people are not angry or not repulsive, then Carlos is hard-working. Barclay being not repulsive implies that Theobold is blue and Alastair is clever.
Andrew is repulsive.
self_contradiction
Jessie is not angry. Barclay is not repulsive. Jessie is not repulsive. Andrew is not repulsive. Carlos is repulsive. Theobold is angry. Jessie is hard-working. Camille is blue. Carlos is not clever. Theobold is not wooden. Theobold is not clever. Andrew is not wooden.If Barclay is not blue, then Jessie is wooden, and vice versa. Someone being both angry and clever is equivalent to being not repulsive and wooden. If there is someone who is both clever and not blue, then Jessie is not hard-working. If there is someone who is angry, then Carlos is wooden. If someone is clever, then he is both angry and not repulsive. If there is someone who is blue, then Theobold is wooden and Andrew is hard-working. If there is someone who is either hard-working or blue, then Jessie is wooden. If there is someone who is both hard-working and not angry, then Alastair is not wooden. Someone being not wooden is equivalent to being clever. All hard-working people are repulsive. If all people are not angry or not repulsive, then Carlos is hard-working. Barclay being not repulsive implies that Theobold is blue and Alastair is clever.
Andrew is blue.
neutral
Jessie is not angry. Barclay is not repulsive. Jessie is not repulsive. Andrew is not repulsive. Carlos is repulsive. Theobold is angry. Jessie is hard-working. Camille is blue. Carlos is not clever. Theobold is not wooden. Theobold is not clever. Andrew is not wooden.If Barclay is not blue, then Jessie is wooden, and vice versa. Someone being both angry and clever is equivalent to being not repulsive and wooden. If there is someone who is both clever and not blue, then Jessie is not hard-working. If there is someone who is angry, then Carlos is wooden. If someone is clever, then he is both angry and not repulsive. If there is someone who is blue, then Theobold is wooden and Andrew is hard-working. If there is someone who is either hard-working or blue, then Jessie is wooden. If there is someone who is both hard-working and not angry, then Alastair is not wooden. Someone being not wooden is equivalent to being clever. All hard-working people are repulsive. If all people are not angry or not repulsive, then Carlos is hard-working. Barclay being not repulsive implies that Theobold is blue and Alastair is clever.
Carlos is blue.
neutral
Jessie is not angry. Barclay is not repulsive. Jessie is not repulsive. Andrew is not repulsive. Carlos is repulsive. Theobold is angry. Jessie is hard-working. Camille is blue. Carlos is not clever. Theobold is not wooden. Theobold is not clever. Andrew is not wooden.If Barclay is not blue, then Jessie is wooden, and vice versa. Someone being both angry and clever is equivalent to being not repulsive and wooden. If there is someone who is both clever and not blue, then Jessie is not hard-working. If there is someone who is angry, then Carlos is wooden. If someone is clever, then he is both angry and not repulsive. If there is someone who is blue, then Theobold is wooden and Andrew is hard-working. If there is someone who is either hard-working or blue, then Jessie is wooden. If there is someone who is both hard-working and not angry, then Alastair is not wooden. Someone being not wooden is equivalent to being clever. All hard-working people are repulsive. If all people are not angry or not repulsive, then Carlos is hard-working. Barclay being not repulsive implies that Theobold is blue and Alastair is clever.
Barclay is repulsive.
contradiction
Jessie is not angry. Barclay is not repulsive. Jessie is not repulsive. Andrew is not repulsive. Carlos is repulsive. Theobold is angry. Jessie is hard-working. Camille is blue. Carlos is not clever. Theobold is not wooden. Theobold is not clever. Andrew is not wooden.If Barclay is not blue, then Jessie is wooden, and vice versa. Someone being both angry and clever is equivalent to being not repulsive and wooden. If there is someone who is both clever and not blue, then Jessie is not hard-working. If there is someone who is angry, then Carlos is wooden. If someone is clever, then he is both angry and not repulsive. If there is someone who is blue, then Theobold is wooden and Andrew is hard-working. If there is someone who is either hard-working or blue, then Jessie is wooden. If there is someone who is both hard-working and not angry, then Alastair is not wooden. Someone being not wooden is equivalent to being clever. All hard-working people are repulsive. If all people are not angry or not repulsive, then Carlos is hard-working. Barclay being not repulsive implies that Theobold is blue and Alastair is clever.
Jessie is clever.
entailment
Jessie is not angry. Barclay is not repulsive. Jessie is not repulsive. Andrew is not repulsive. Carlos is repulsive. Theobold is angry. Jessie is hard-working. Camille is blue. Carlos is not clever. Theobold is not wooden. Theobold is not clever. Andrew is not wooden.If Barclay is not blue, then Jessie is wooden, and vice versa. Someone being both angry and clever is equivalent to being not repulsive and wooden. If there is someone who is both clever and not blue, then Jessie is not hard-working. If there is someone who is angry, then Carlos is wooden. If someone is clever, then he is both angry and not repulsive. If there is someone who is blue, then Theobold is wooden and Andrew is hard-working. If there is someone who is either hard-working or blue, then Jessie is wooden. If there is someone who is both hard-working and not angry, then Alastair is not wooden. Someone being not wooden is equivalent to being clever. All hard-working people are repulsive. If all people are not angry or not repulsive, then Carlos is hard-working. Barclay being not repulsive implies that Theobold is blue and Alastair is clever.
Theobold is clever.
self_contradiction
Jessie is not angry. Barclay is not repulsive. Jessie is not repulsive. Andrew is not repulsive. Carlos is repulsive. Theobold is angry. Jessie is hard-working. Camille is blue. Carlos is not clever. Theobold is not wooden. Theobold is not clever. Andrew is not wooden.If Barclay is not blue, then Jessie is wooden, and vice versa. Someone being both angry and clever is equivalent to being not repulsive and wooden. If there is someone who is both clever and not blue, then Jessie is not hard-working. If there is someone who is angry, then Carlos is wooden. If someone is clever, then he is both angry and not repulsive. If there is someone who is blue, then Theobold is wooden and Andrew is hard-working. If there is someone who is either hard-working or blue, then Jessie is wooden. If there is someone who is both hard-working and not angry, then Alastair is not wooden. Someone being not wooden is equivalent to being clever. All hard-working people are repulsive. If all people are not angry or not repulsive, then Carlos is hard-working. Barclay being not repulsive implies that Theobold is blue and Alastair is clever.
Carlos is not blue.
neutral
Jessie is not angry. Barclay is not repulsive. Jessie is not repulsive. Andrew is not repulsive. Carlos is repulsive. Theobold is angry. Jessie is hard-working. Camille is blue. Carlos is not clever. Theobold is not wooden. Theobold is not clever. Andrew is not wooden.If Barclay is not blue, then Jessie is wooden, and vice versa. Someone being both angry and clever is equivalent to being not repulsive and wooden. If there is someone who is both clever and not blue, then Jessie is not hard-working. If there is someone who is angry, then Carlos is wooden. If someone is clever, then he is both angry and not repulsive. If there is someone who is blue, then Theobold is wooden and Andrew is hard-working. If there is someone who is either hard-working or blue, then Jessie is wooden. If there is someone who is both hard-working and not angry, then Alastair is not wooden. Someone being not wooden is equivalent to being clever. All hard-working people are repulsive. If all people are not angry or not repulsive, then Carlos is hard-working. Barclay being not repulsive implies that Theobold is blue and Alastair is clever.
Barclay is not blue.
entailment
Jessie is not angry. Barclay is not repulsive. Jessie is not repulsive. Andrew is not repulsive. Carlos is repulsive. Theobold is angry. Jessie is hard-working. Camille is blue. Carlos is not clever. Theobold is not wooden. Theobold is not clever. Andrew is not wooden.If Barclay is not blue, then Jessie is wooden, and vice versa. Someone being both angry and clever is equivalent to being not repulsive and wooden. If there is someone who is both clever and not blue, then Jessie is not hard-working. If there is someone who is angry, then Carlos is wooden. If someone is clever, then he is both angry and not repulsive. If there is someone who is blue, then Theobold is wooden and Andrew is hard-working. If there is someone who is either hard-working or blue, then Jessie is wooden. If there is someone who is both hard-working and not angry, then Alastair is not wooden. Someone being not wooden is equivalent to being clever. All hard-working people are repulsive. If all people are not angry or not repulsive, then Carlos is hard-working. Barclay being not repulsive implies that Theobold is blue and Alastair is clever.
Theobold is not hard-working.
neutral
Jessie is not angry. Barclay is not repulsive. Jessie is not repulsive. Andrew is not repulsive. Carlos is repulsive. Theobold is angry. Jessie is hard-working. Camille is blue. Carlos is not clever. Theobold is not wooden. Theobold is not clever. Andrew is not wooden.If Barclay is not blue, then Jessie is wooden, and vice versa. Someone being both angry and clever is equivalent to being not repulsive and wooden. If there is someone who is both clever and not blue, then Jessie is not hard-working. If there is someone who is angry, then Carlos is wooden. If someone is clever, then he is both angry and not repulsive. If there is someone who is blue, then Theobold is wooden and Andrew is hard-working. If there is someone who is either hard-working or blue, then Jessie is wooden. If there is someone who is both hard-working and not angry, then Alastair is not wooden. Someone being not wooden is equivalent to being clever. All hard-working people are repulsive. If all people are not angry or not repulsive, then Carlos is hard-working. Barclay being not repulsive implies that Theobold is blue and Alastair is clever.
Barclay is not repulsive.
entailment
Jessie is not angry. Barclay is not repulsive. Jessie is not repulsive. Andrew is not repulsive. Carlos is repulsive. Theobold is angry. Jessie is hard-working. Camille is blue. Carlos is not clever. Theobold is not wooden. Theobold is not clever. Andrew is not wooden.If Barclay is not blue, then Jessie is wooden, and vice versa. Someone being both angry and clever is equivalent to being not repulsive and wooden. If there is someone who is both clever and not blue, then Jessie is not hard-working. If there is someone who is angry, then Carlos is wooden. If someone is clever, then he is both angry and not repulsive. If there is someone who is blue, then Theobold is wooden and Andrew is hard-working. If there is someone who is either hard-working or blue, then Jessie is wooden. If there is someone who is both hard-working and not angry, then Alastair is not wooden. Someone being not wooden is equivalent to being clever. All hard-working people are repulsive. If all people are not angry or not repulsive, then Carlos is hard-working. Barclay being not repulsive implies that Theobold is blue and Alastair is clever.
Andrew is not wooden.
self_contradiction
Jessie is not angry. Barclay is not repulsive. Jessie is not repulsive. Andrew is not repulsive. Carlos is repulsive. Theobold is angry. Jessie is hard-working. Camille is blue. Carlos is not clever. Theobold is not wooden. Theobold is not clever. Andrew is not wooden.If Barclay is not blue, then Jessie is wooden, and vice versa. Someone being both angry and clever is equivalent to being not repulsive and wooden. If there is someone who is both clever and not blue, then Jessie is not hard-working. If there is someone who is angry, then Carlos is wooden. If someone is clever, then he is both angry and not repulsive. If there is someone who is blue, then Theobold is wooden and Andrew is hard-working. If there is someone who is either hard-working or blue, then Jessie is wooden. If there is someone who is both hard-working and not angry, then Alastair is not wooden. Someone being not wooden is equivalent to being clever. All hard-working people are repulsive. If all people are not angry or not repulsive, then Carlos is hard-working. Barclay being not repulsive implies that Theobold is blue and Alastair is clever.
Alastair is not angry.
contradiction
Hadley is hilarious. Blanca is popular. Hadley is foolish. Marlin is not modern. Kimberly is foolish. Helena is modern. Bruno is not hilarious. Kimberly is not modern. Marlin is popular. Helena is foolish. Helena is popular. Helena is safe.If there is someone who is both not popular and safe, then Kimberly is foolish and Kirby is hilarious. If someone is not modern or not safe, then he is not hilarious. Someone being both popular and not hilarious is equivalent to being safe and foolish. Someone is modern and not safe if and only if he is not foolish and hilarious. If there is at least one people who is safe, then Helena is massive. If there is at least one people who is either massive or not popular, then Marlin is foolish and Hadley is not modern. Someone being both hilarious and not foolish is equivalent to being not popular and not safe. If there is someone who is either massive or not foolish, then Marlin is safe. It can be concluded that Hadley is not safe once knowing that Kimberly is hilarious. Someone being both hilarious and not massive is equivalent to being not modern. Someone is not popular and not modern if and only if he is hilarious and not foolish. Kimberly is modern if and only if Blanca is not safe.
Helena is modern.
entailment
Hadley is hilarious. Blanca is popular. Hadley is foolish. Marlin is not modern. Kimberly is foolish. Helena is modern. Bruno is not hilarious. Kimberly is not modern. Marlin is popular. Helena is foolish. Helena is popular. Helena is safe.If there is someone who is both not popular and safe, then Kimberly is foolish and Kirby is hilarious. If someone is not modern or not safe, then he is not hilarious. Someone being both popular and not hilarious is equivalent to being safe and foolish. Someone is modern and not safe if and only if he is not foolish and hilarious. If there is at least one people who is safe, then Helena is massive. If there is at least one people who is either massive or not popular, then Marlin is foolish and Hadley is not modern. Someone being both hilarious and not foolish is equivalent to being not popular and not safe. If there is someone who is either massive or not foolish, then Marlin is safe. It can be concluded that Hadley is not safe once knowing that Kimberly is hilarious. Someone being both hilarious and not massive is equivalent to being not modern. Someone is not popular and not modern if and only if he is hilarious and not foolish. Kimberly is modern if and only if Blanca is not safe.
Kirby is safe.
neutral
Hadley is hilarious. Blanca is popular. Hadley is foolish. Marlin is not modern. Kimberly is foolish. Helena is modern. Bruno is not hilarious. Kimberly is not modern. Marlin is popular. Helena is foolish. Helena is popular. Helena is safe.If there is someone who is both not popular and safe, then Kimberly is foolish and Kirby is hilarious. If someone is not modern or not safe, then he is not hilarious. Someone being both popular and not hilarious is equivalent to being safe and foolish. Someone is modern and not safe if and only if he is not foolish and hilarious. If there is at least one people who is safe, then Helena is massive. If there is at least one people who is either massive or not popular, then Marlin is foolish and Hadley is not modern. Someone being both hilarious and not foolish is equivalent to being not popular and not safe. If there is someone who is either massive or not foolish, then Marlin is safe. It can be concluded that Hadley is not safe once knowing that Kimberly is hilarious. Someone being both hilarious and not massive is equivalent to being not modern. Someone is not popular and not modern if and only if he is hilarious and not foolish. Kimberly is modern if and only if Blanca is not safe.
Bruno is not popular.
neutral
Hadley is hilarious. Blanca is popular. Hadley is foolish. Marlin is not modern. Kimberly is foolish. Helena is modern. Bruno is not hilarious. Kimberly is not modern. Marlin is popular. Helena is foolish. Helena is popular. Helena is safe.If there is someone who is both not popular and safe, then Kimberly is foolish and Kirby is hilarious. If someone is not modern or not safe, then he is not hilarious. Someone being both popular and not hilarious is equivalent to being safe and foolish. Someone is modern and not safe if and only if he is not foolish and hilarious. If there is at least one people who is safe, then Helena is massive. If there is at least one people who is either massive or not popular, then Marlin is foolish and Hadley is not modern. Someone being both hilarious and not foolish is equivalent to being not popular and not safe. If there is someone who is either massive or not foolish, then Marlin is safe. It can be concluded that Hadley is not safe once knowing that Kimberly is hilarious. Someone being both hilarious and not massive is equivalent to being not modern. Someone is not popular and not modern if and only if he is hilarious and not foolish. Kimberly is modern if and only if Blanca is not safe.
Helena is not modern.
contradiction
Hadley is hilarious. Blanca is popular. Hadley is foolish. Marlin is not modern. Kimberly is foolish. Helena is modern. Bruno is not hilarious. Kimberly is not modern. Marlin is popular. Helena is foolish. Helena is popular. Helena is safe.If there is someone who is both not popular and safe, then Kimberly is foolish and Kirby is hilarious. If someone is not modern or not safe, then he is not hilarious. Someone being both popular and not hilarious is equivalent to being safe and foolish. Someone is modern and not safe if and only if he is not foolish and hilarious. If there is at least one people who is safe, then Helena is massive. If there is at least one people who is either massive or not popular, then Marlin is foolish and Hadley is not modern. Someone being both hilarious and not foolish is equivalent to being not popular and not safe. If there is someone who is either massive or not foolish, then Marlin is safe. It can be concluded that Hadley is not safe once knowing that Kimberly is hilarious. Someone being both hilarious and not massive is equivalent to being not modern. Someone is not popular and not modern if and only if he is hilarious and not foolish. Kimberly is modern if and only if Blanca is not safe.
Marlin is not modern.
entailment
Hadley is hilarious. Blanca is popular. Hadley is foolish. Marlin is not modern. Kimberly is foolish. Helena is modern. Bruno is not hilarious. Kimberly is not modern. Marlin is popular. Helena is foolish. Helena is popular. Helena is safe.If there is someone who is both not popular and safe, then Kimberly is foolish and Kirby is hilarious. If someone is not modern or not safe, then he is not hilarious. Someone being both popular and not hilarious is equivalent to being safe and foolish. Someone is modern and not safe if and only if he is not foolish and hilarious. If there is at least one people who is safe, then Helena is massive. If there is at least one people who is either massive or not popular, then Marlin is foolish and Hadley is not modern. Someone being both hilarious and not foolish is equivalent to being not popular and not safe. If there is someone who is either massive or not foolish, then Marlin is safe. It can be concluded that Hadley is not safe once knowing that Kimberly is hilarious. Someone being both hilarious and not massive is equivalent to being not modern. Someone is not popular and not modern if and only if he is hilarious and not foolish. Kimberly is modern if and only if Blanca is not safe.
Hadley is not hilarious.
self_contradiction
Hadley is hilarious. Blanca is popular. Hadley is foolish. Marlin is not modern. Kimberly is foolish. Helena is modern. Bruno is not hilarious. Kimberly is not modern. Marlin is popular. Helena is foolish. Helena is popular. Helena is safe.If there is someone who is both not popular and safe, then Kimberly is foolish and Kirby is hilarious. If someone is not modern or not safe, then he is not hilarious. Someone being both popular and not hilarious is equivalent to being safe and foolish. Someone is modern and not safe if and only if he is not foolish and hilarious. If there is at least one people who is safe, then Helena is massive. If there is at least one people who is either massive or not popular, then Marlin is foolish and Hadley is not modern. Someone being both hilarious and not foolish is equivalent to being not popular and not safe. If there is someone who is either massive or not foolish, then Marlin is safe. It can be concluded that Hadley is not safe once knowing that Kimberly is hilarious. Someone being both hilarious and not massive is equivalent to being not modern. Someone is not popular and not modern if and only if he is hilarious and not foolish. Kimberly is modern if and only if Blanca is not safe.
Kirby is popular.
neutral
Hadley is hilarious. Blanca is popular. Hadley is foolish. Marlin is not modern. Kimberly is foolish. Helena is modern. Bruno is not hilarious. Kimberly is not modern. Marlin is popular. Helena is foolish. Helena is popular. Helena is safe.If there is someone who is both not popular and safe, then Kimberly is foolish and Kirby is hilarious. If someone is not modern or not safe, then he is not hilarious. Someone being both popular and not hilarious is equivalent to being safe and foolish. Someone is modern and not safe if and only if he is not foolish and hilarious. If there is at least one people who is safe, then Helena is massive. If there is at least one people who is either massive or not popular, then Marlin is foolish and Hadley is not modern. Someone being both hilarious and not foolish is equivalent to being not popular and not safe. If there is someone who is either massive or not foolish, then Marlin is safe. It can be concluded that Hadley is not safe once knowing that Kimberly is hilarious. Someone being both hilarious and not massive is equivalent to being not modern. Someone is not popular and not modern if and only if he is hilarious and not foolish. Kimberly is modern if and only if Blanca is not safe.
Kirby is foolish.
neutral
Hadley is hilarious. Blanca is popular. Hadley is foolish. Marlin is not modern. Kimberly is foolish. Helena is modern. Bruno is not hilarious. Kimberly is not modern. Marlin is popular. Helena is foolish. Helena is popular. Helena is safe.If there is someone who is both not popular and safe, then Kimberly is foolish and Kirby is hilarious. If someone is not modern or not safe, then he is not hilarious. Someone being both popular and not hilarious is equivalent to being safe and foolish. Someone is modern and not safe if and only if he is not foolish and hilarious. If there is at least one people who is safe, then Helena is massive. If there is at least one people who is either massive or not popular, then Marlin is foolish and Hadley is not modern. Someone being both hilarious and not foolish is equivalent to being not popular and not safe. If there is someone who is either massive or not foolish, then Marlin is safe. It can be concluded that Hadley is not safe once knowing that Kimberly is hilarious. Someone being both hilarious and not massive is equivalent to being not modern. Someone is not popular and not modern if and only if he is hilarious and not foolish. Kimberly is modern if and only if Blanca is not safe.
Hadley is massive.
contradiction
Hadley is hilarious. Blanca is popular. Hadley is foolish. Marlin is not modern. Kimberly is foolish. Helena is modern. Bruno is not hilarious. Kimberly is not modern. Marlin is popular. Helena is foolish. Helena is popular. Helena is safe.If there is someone who is both not popular and safe, then Kimberly is foolish and Kirby is hilarious. If someone is not modern or not safe, then he is not hilarious. Someone being both popular and not hilarious is equivalent to being safe and foolish. Someone is modern and not safe if and only if he is not foolish and hilarious. If there is at least one people who is safe, then Helena is massive. If there is at least one people who is either massive or not popular, then Marlin is foolish and Hadley is not modern. Someone being both hilarious and not foolish is equivalent to being not popular and not safe. If there is someone who is either massive or not foolish, then Marlin is safe. It can be concluded that Hadley is not safe once knowing that Kimberly is hilarious. Someone being both hilarious and not massive is equivalent to being not modern. Someone is not popular and not modern if and only if he is hilarious and not foolish. Kimberly is modern if and only if Blanca is not safe.
Marlin is safe.
entailment
Hadley is hilarious. Blanca is popular. Hadley is foolish. Marlin is not modern. Kimberly is foolish. Helena is modern. Bruno is not hilarious. Kimberly is not modern. Marlin is popular. Helena is foolish. Helena is popular. Helena is safe.If there is someone who is both not popular and safe, then Kimberly is foolish and Kirby is hilarious. If someone is not modern or not safe, then he is not hilarious. Someone being both popular and not hilarious is equivalent to being safe and foolish. Someone is modern and not safe if and only if he is not foolish and hilarious. If there is at least one people who is safe, then Helena is massive. If there is at least one people who is either massive or not popular, then Marlin is foolish and Hadley is not modern. Someone being both hilarious and not foolish is equivalent to being not popular and not safe. If there is someone who is either massive or not foolish, then Marlin is safe. It can be concluded that Hadley is not safe once knowing that Kimberly is hilarious. Someone being both hilarious and not massive is equivalent to being not modern. Someone is not popular and not modern if and only if he is hilarious and not foolish. Kimberly is modern if and only if Blanca is not safe.
Helena is popular.
entailment
Hadley is hilarious. Blanca is popular. Hadley is foolish. Marlin is not modern. Kimberly is foolish. Helena is modern. Bruno is not hilarious. Kimberly is not modern. Marlin is popular. Helena is foolish. Helena is popular. Helena is safe.If there is someone who is both not popular and safe, then Kimberly is foolish and Kirby is hilarious. If someone is not modern or not safe, then he is not hilarious. Someone being both popular and not hilarious is equivalent to being safe and foolish. Someone is modern and not safe if and only if he is not foolish and hilarious. If there is at least one people who is safe, then Helena is massive. If there is at least one people who is either massive or not popular, then Marlin is foolish and Hadley is not modern. Someone being both hilarious and not foolish is equivalent to being not popular and not safe. If there is someone who is either massive or not foolish, then Marlin is safe. It can be concluded that Hadley is not safe once knowing that Kimberly is hilarious. Someone being both hilarious and not massive is equivalent to being not modern. Someone is not popular and not modern if and only if he is hilarious and not foolish. Kimberly is modern if and only if Blanca is not safe.
Helena is foolish.
entailment
Hadley is hilarious. Blanca is popular. Hadley is foolish. Marlin is not modern. Kimberly is foolish. Helena is modern. Bruno is not hilarious. Kimberly is not modern. Marlin is popular. Helena is foolish. Helena is popular. Helena is safe.If there is someone who is both not popular and safe, then Kimberly is foolish and Kirby is hilarious. If someone is not modern or not safe, then he is not hilarious. Someone being both popular and not hilarious is equivalent to being safe and foolish. Someone is modern and not safe if and only if he is not foolish and hilarious. If there is at least one people who is safe, then Helena is massive. If there is at least one people who is either massive or not popular, then Marlin is foolish and Hadley is not modern. Someone being both hilarious and not foolish is equivalent to being not popular and not safe. If there is someone who is either massive or not foolish, then Marlin is safe. It can be concluded that Hadley is not safe once knowing that Kimberly is hilarious. Someone being both hilarious and not massive is equivalent to being not modern. Someone is not popular and not modern if and only if he is hilarious and not foolish. Kimberly is modern if and only if Blanca is not safe.
Hadley is not foolish.
contradiction
Hadley is hilarious. Blanca is popular. Hadley is foolish. Marlin is not modern. Kimberly is foolish. Helena is modern. Bruno is not hilarious. Kimberly is not modern. Marlin is popular. Helena is foolish. Helena is popular. Helena is safe.If there is someone who is both not popular and safe, then Kimberly is foolish and Kirby is hilarious. If someone is not modern or not safe, then he is not hilarious. Someone being both popular and not hilarious is equivalent to being safe and foolish. Someone is modern and not safe if and only if he is not foolish and hilarious. If there is at least one people who is safe, then Helena is massive. If there is at least one people who is either massive or not popular, then Marlin is foolish and Hadley is not modern. Someone being both hilarious and not foolish is equivalent to being not popular and not safe. If there is someone who is either massive or not foolish, then Marlin is safe. It can be concluded that Hadley is not safe once knowing that Kimberly is hilarious. Someone being both hilarious and not massive is equivalent to being not modern. Someone is not popular and not modern if and only if he is hilarious and not foolish. Kimberly is modern if and only if Blanca is not safe.
Bruno is modern.
neutral
Hadley is hilarious. Blanca is popular. Hadley is foolish. Marlin is not modern. Kimberly is foolish. Helena is modern. Bruno is not hilarious. Kimberly is not modern. Marlin is popular. Helena is foolish. Helena is popular. Helena is safe.If there is someone who is both not popular and safe, then Kimberly is foolish and Kirby is hilarious. If someone is not modern or not safe, then he is not hilarious. Someone being both popular and not hilarious is equivalent to being safe and foolish. Someone is modern and not safe if and only if he is not foolish and hilarious. If there is at least one people who is safe, then Helena is massive. If there is at least one people who is either massive or not popular, then Marlin is foolish and Hadley is not modern. Someone being both hilarious and not foolish is equivalent to being not popular and not safe. If there is someone who is either massive or not foolish, then Marlin is safe. It can be concluded that Hadley is not safe once knowing that Kimberly is hilarious. Someone being both hilarious and not massive is equivalent to being not modern. Someone is not popular and not modern if and only if he is hilarious and not foolish. Kimberly is modern if and only if Blanca is not safe.
Kimberly is hilarious.
self_contradiction
Hadley is hilarious. Blanca is popular. Hadley is foolish. Marlin is not modern. Kimberly is foolish. Helena is modern. Bruno is not hilarious. Kimberly is not modern. Marlin is popular. Helena is foolish. Helena is popular. Helena is safe.If there is someone who is both not popular and safe, then Kimberly is foolish and Kirby is hilarious. If someone is not modern or not safe, then he is not hilarious. Someone being both popular and not hilarious is equivalent to being safe and foolish. Someone is modern and not safe if and only if he is not foolish and hilarious. If there is at least one people who is safe, then Helena is massive. If there is at least one people who is either massive or not popular, then Marlin is foolish and Hadley is not modern. Someone being both hilarious and not foolish is equivalent to being not popular and not safe. If there is someone who is either massive or not foolish, then Marlin is safe. It can be concluded that Hadley is not safe once knowing that Kimberly is hilarious. Someone being both hilarious and not massive is equivalent to being not modern. Someone is not popular and not modern if and only if he is hilarious and not foolish. Kimberly is modern if and only if Blanca is not safe.
Blanca is not popular.
contradiction
Hadley is hilarious. Blanca is popular. Hadley is foolish. Marlin is not modern. Kimberly is foolish. Helena is modern. Bruno is not hilarious. Kimberly is not modern. Marlin is popular. Helena is foolish. Helena is popular. Helena is safe.If there is someone who is both not popular and safe, then Kimberly is foolish and Kirby is hilarious. If someone is not modern or not safe, then he is not hilarious. Someone being both popular and not hilarious is equivalent to being safe and foolish. Someone is modern and not safe if and only if he is not foolish and hilarious. If there is at least one people who is safe, then Helena is massive. If there is at least one people who is either massive or not popular, then Marlin is foolish and Hadley is not modern. Someone being both hilarious and not foolish is equivalent to being not popular and not safe. If there is someone who is either massive or not foolish, then Marlin is safe. It can be concluded that Hadley is not safe once knowing that Kimberly is hilarious. Someone being both hilarious and not massive is equivalent to being not modern. Someone is not popular and not modern if and only if he is hilarious and not foolish. Kimberly is modern if and only if Blanca is not safe.
Hadley is modern.
contradiction
Hadley is hilarious. Blanca is popular. Hadley is foolish. Marlin is not modern. Kimberly is foolish. Helena is modern. Bruno is not hilarious. Kimberly is not modern. Marlin is popular. Helena is foolish. Helena is popular. Helena is safe.If there is someone who is both not popular and safe, then Kimberly is foolish and Kirby is hilarious. If someone is not modern or not safe, then he is not hilarious. Someone being both popular and not hilarious is equivalent to being safe and foolish. Someone is modern and not safe if and only if he is not foolish and hilarious. If there is at least one people who is safe, then Helena is massive. If there is at least one people who is either massive or not popular, then Marlin is foolish and Hadley is not modern. Someone being both hilarious and not foolish is equivalent to being not popular and not safe. If there is someone who is either massive or not foolish, then Marlin is safe. It can be concluded that Hadley is not safe once knowing that Kimberly is hilarious. Someone being both hilarious and not massive is equivalent to being not modern. Someone is not popular and not modern if and only if he is hilarious and not foolish. Kimberly is modern if and only if Blanca is not safe.
Hadley is hilarious.
self_contradiction
Hadley is hilarious. Blanca is popular. Hadley is foolish. Marlin is not modern. Kimberly is foolish. Helena is modern. Bruno is not hilarious. Kimberly is not modern. Marlin is popular. Helena is foolish. Helena is popular. Helena is safe.If there is someone who is both not popular and safe, then Kimberly is foolish and Kirby is hilarious. If someone is not modern or not safe, then he is not hilarious. Someone being both popular and not hilarious is equivalent to being safe and foolish. Someone is modern and not safe if and only if he is not foolish and hilarious. If there is at least one people who is safe, then Helena is massive. If there is at least one people who is either massive or not popular, then Marlin is foolish and Hadley is not modern. Someone being both hilarious and not foolish is equivalent to being not popular and not safe. If there is someone who is either massive or not foolish, then Marlin is safe. It can be concluded that Hadley is not safe once knowing that Kimberly is hilarious. Someone being both hilarious and not massive is equivalent to being not modern. Someone is not popular and not modern if and only if he is hilarious and not foolish. Kimberly is modern if and only if Blanca is not safe.
Marlin is not hilarious.
self_contradiction
Hadley is hilarious. Blanca is popular. Hadley is foolish. Marlin is not modern. Kimberly is foolish. Helena is modern. Bruno is not hilarious. Kimberly is not modern. Marlin is popular. Helena is foolish. Helena is popular. Helena is safe.If there is someone who is both not popular and safe, then Kimberly is foolish and Kirby is hilarious. If someone is not modern or not safe, then he is not hilarious. Someone being both popular and not hilarious is equivalent to being safe and foolish. Someone is modern and not safe if and only if he is not foolish and hilarious. If there is at least one people who is safe, then Helena is massive. If there is at least one people who is either massive or not popular, then Marlin is foolish and Hadley is not modern. Someone being both hilarious and not foolish is equivalent to being not popular and not safe. If there is someone who is either massive or not foolish, then Marlin is safe. It can be concluded that Hadley is not safe once knowing that Kimberly is hilarious. Someone being both hilarious and not massive is equivalent to being not modern. Someone is not popular and not modern if and only if he is hilarious and not foolish. Kimberly is modern if and only if Blanca is not safe.
Kimberly is not hilarious.
self_contradiction
Kerwin is shiny. Kerwin is not unfair. Kerwin is not scary. Kerwin is depressed. Alton is not unfair. Calvert is unfair. Alton is not shiny. Rachelle is unfair. Calvert is desperate. Caldwell is unfair. Calvert is not scary. Rachelle is desperate.If Alton is available, then Caldwell is not scary and Rachelle is depressed, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is both not shiny and not available, then Kerwin is desperate. If someone is not depressed, then he is available. Alton is not shiny if and only if Rachelle is not unfair. If there is someone who is either not shiny or not available, then Orlando is desperate and Caldwell is unfair. If someone who is not unfair is also not available, then he is desperate. Someone is desperate and not shiny if and only if he is scary. If there is at least one people who is desperate, then Calvert is not unfair and Brooke is not depressed. It can be concluded that Caldwell is not available once knowing that Caldwell is scary or Rachelle is depressed. It can be concluded that Rachelle is scary once knowing that Kerwin is not unfair and Alton is depressed. It can be concluded that Orlando is not depressed once knowing that Alton is not available and Calvert is not desperate. If there is at least one people who is not unfair, then Calvert is scary and Brooke is available.
Alton is not scary.
neutral
Kerwin is shiny. Kerwin is not unfair. Kerwin is not scary. Kerwin is depressed. Alton is not unfair. Calvert is unfair. Alton is not shiny. Rachelle is unfair. Calvert is desperate. Caldwell is unfair. Calvert is not scary. Rachelle is desperate.If Alton is available, then Caldwell is not scary and Rachelle is depressed, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is both not shiny and not available, then Kerwin is desperate. If someone is not depressed, then he is available. Alton is not shiny if and only if Rachelle is not unfair. If there is someone who is either not shiny or not available, then Orlando is desperate and Caldwell is unfair. If someone who is not unfair is also not available, then he is desperate. Someone is desperate and not shiny if and only if he is scary. If there is at least one people who is desperate, then Calvert is not unfair and Brooke is not depressed. It can be concluded that Caldwell is not available once knowing that Caldwell is scary or Rachelle is depressed. It can be concluded that Rachelle is scary once knowing that Kerwin is not unfair and Alton is depressed. It can be concluded that Orlando is not depressed once knowing that Alton is not available and Calvert is not desperate. If there is at least one people who is not unfair, then Calvert is scary and Brooke is available.
Calvert is not shiny.
entailment
Kerwin is shiny. Kerwin is not unfair. Kerwin is not scary. Kerwin is depressed. Alton is not unfair. Calvert is unfair. Alton is not shiny. Rachelle is unfair. Calvert is desperate. Caldwell is unfair. Calvert is not scary. Rachelle is desperate.If Alton is available, then Caldwell is not scary and Rachelle is depressed, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is both not shiny and not available, then Kerwin is desperate. If someone is not depressed, then he is available. Alton is not shiny if and only if Rachelle is not unfair. If there is someone who is either not shiny or not available, then Orlando is desperate and Caldwell is unfair. If someone who is not unfair is also not available, then he is desperate. Someone is desperate and not shiny if and only if he is scary. If there is at least one people who is desperate, then Calvert is not unfair and Brooke is not depressed. It can be concluded that Caldwell is not available once knowing that Caldwell is scary or Rachelle is depressed. It can be concluded that Rachelle is scary once knowing that Kerwin is not unfair and Alton is depressed. It can be concluded that Orlando is not depressed once knowing that Alton is not available and Calvert is not desperate. If there is at least one people who is not unfair, then Calvert is scary and Brooke is available.
Orlando is not shiny.
neutral
Kerwin is shiny. Kerwin is not unfair. Kerwin is not scary. Kerwin is depressed. Alton is not unfair. Calvert is unfair. Alton is not shiny. Rachelle is unfair. Calvert is desperate. Caldwell is unfair. Calvert is not scary. Rachelle is desperate.If Alton is available, then Caldwell is not scary and Rachelle is depressed, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is both not shiny and not available, then Kerwin is desperate. If someone is not depressed, then he is available. Alton is not shiny if and only if Rachelle is not unfair. If there is someone who is either not shiny or not available, then Orlando is desperate and Caldwell is unfair. If someone who is not unfair is also not available, then he is desperate. Someone is desperate and not shiny if and only if he is scary. If there is at least one people who is desperate, then Calvert is not unfair and Brooke is not depressed. It can be concluded that Caldwell is not available once knowing that Caldwell is scary or Rachelle is depressed. It can be concluded that Rachelle is scary once knowing that Kerwin is not unfair and Alton is depressed. It can be concluded that Orlando is not depressed once knowing that Alton is not available and Calvert is not desperate. If there is at least one people who is not unfair, then Calvert is scary and Brooke is available.
Brooke is not available.
contradiction
Kerwin is shiny. Kerwin is not unfair. Kerwin is not scary. Kerwin is depressed. Alton is not unfair. Calvert is unfair. Alton is not shiny. Rachelle is unfair. Calvert is desperate. Caldwell is unfair. Calvert is not scary. Rachelle is desperate.If Alton is available, then Caldwell is not scary and Rachelle is depressed, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is both not shiny and not available, then Kerwin is desperate. If someone is not depressed, then he is available. Alton is not shiny if and only if Rachelle is not unfair. If there is someone who is either not shiny or not available, then Orlando is desperate and Caldwell is unfair. If someone who is not unfair is also not available, then he is desperate. Someone is desperate and not shiny if and only if he is scary. If there is at least one people who is desperate, then Calvert is not unfair and Brooke is not depressed. It can be concluded that Caldwell is not available once knowing that Caldwell is scary or Rachelle is depressed. It can be concluded that Rachelle is scary once knowing that Kerwin is not unfair and Alton is depressed. It can be concluded that Orlando is not depressed once knowing that Alton is not available and Calvert is not desperate. If there is at least one people who is not unfair, then Calvert is scary and Brooke is available.
Calvert is unfair.
self_contradiction
Kerwin is shiny. Kerwin is not unfair. Kerwin is not scary. Kerwin is depressed. Alton is not unfair. Calvert is unfair. Alton is not shiny. Rachelle is unfair. Calvert is desperate. Caldwell is unfair. Calvert is not scary. Rachelle is desperate.If Alton is available, then Caldwell is not scary and Rachelle is depressed, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is both not shiny and not available, then Kerwin is desperate. If someone is not depressed, then he is available. Alton is not shiny if and only if Rachelle is not unfair. If there is someone who is either not shiny or not available, then Orlando is desperate and Caldwell is unfair. If someone who is not unfair is also not available, then he is desperate. Someone is desperate and not shiny if and only if he is scary. If there is at least one people who is desperate, then Calvert is not unfair and Brooke is not depressed. It can be concluded that Caldwell is not available once knowing that Caldwell is scary or Rachelle is depressed. It can be concluded that Rachelle is scary once knowing that Kerwin is not unfair and Alton is depressed. It can be concluded that Orlando is not depressed once knowing that Alton is not available and Calvert is not desperate. If there is at least one people who is not unfair, then Calvert is scary and Brooke is available.
Brooke is depressed.
contradiction
Kerwin is shiny. Kerwin is not unfair. Kerwin is not scary. Kerwin is depressed. Alton is not unfair. Calvert is unfair. Alton is not shiny. Rachelle is unfair. Calvert is desperate. Caldwell is unfair. Calvert is not scary. Rachelle is desperate.If Alton is available, then Caldwell is not scary and Rachelle is depressed, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is both not shiny and not available, then Kerwin is desperate. If someone is not depressed, then he is available. Alton is not shiny if and only if Rachelle is not unfair. If there is someone who is either not shiny or not available, then Orlando is desperate and Caldwell is unfair. If someone who is not unfair is also not available, then he is desperate. Someone is desperate and not shiny if and only if he is scary. If there is at least one people who is desperate, then Calvert is not unfair and Brooke is not depressed. It can be concluded that Caldwell is not available once knowing that Caldwell is scary or Rachelle is depressed. It can be concluded that Rachelle is scary once knowing that Kerwin is not unfair and Alton is depressed. It can be concluded that Orlando is not depressed once knowing that Alton is not available and Calvert is not desperate. If there is at least one people who is not unfair, then Calvert is scary and Brooke is available.
Alton is unfair.
contradiction
Kerwin is shiny. Kerwin is not unfair. Kerwin is not scary. Kerwin is depressed. Alton is not unfair. Calvert is unfair. Alton is not shiny. Rachelle is unfair. Calvert is desperate. Caldwell is unfair. Calvert is not scary. Rachelle is desperate.If Alton is available, then Caldwell is not scary and Rachelle is depressed, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is both not shiny and not available, then Kerwin is desperate. If someone is not depressed, then he is available. Alton is not shiny if and only if Rachelle is not unfair. If there is someone who is either not shiny or not available, then Orlando is desperate and Caldwell is unfair. If someone who is not unfair is also not available, then he is desperate. Someone is desperate and not shiny if and only if he is scary. If there is at least one people who is desperate, then Calvert is not unfair and Brooke is not depressed. It can be concluded that Caldwell is not available once knowing that Caldwell is scary or Rachelle is depressed. It can be concluded that Rachelle is scary once knowing that Kerwin is not unfair and Alton is depressed. It can be concluded that Orlando is not depressed once knowing that Alton is not available and Calvert is not desperate. If there is at least one people who is not unfair, then Calvert is scary and Brooke is available.
Rachelle is unfair.
self_contradiction
Kerwin is shiny. Kerwin is not unfair. Kerwin is not scary. Kerwin is depressed. Alton is not unfair. Calvert is unfair. Alton is not shiny. Rachelle is unfair. Calvert is desperate. Caldwell is unfair. Calvert is not scary. Rachelle is desperate.If Alton is available, then Caldwell is not scary and Rachelle is depressed, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is both not shiny and not available, then Kerwin is desperate. If someone is not depressed, then he is available. Alton is not shiny if and only if Rachelle is not unfair. If there is someone who is either not shiny or not available, then Orlando is desperate and Caldwell is unfair. If someone who is not unfair is also not available, then he is desperate. Someone is desperate and not shiny if and only if he is scary. If there is at least one people who is desperate, then Calvert is not unfair and Brooke is not depressed. It can be concluded that Caldwell is not available once knowing that Caldwell is scary or Rachelle is depressed. It can be concluded that Rachelle is scary once knowing that Kerwin is not unfair and Alton is depressed. It can be concluded that Orlando is not depressed once knowing that Alton is not available and Calvert is not desperate. If there is at least one people who is not unfair, then Calvert is scary and Brooke is available.
Calvert is scary.
self_contradiction
Kerwin is shiny. Kerwin is not unfair. Kerwin is not scary. Kerwin is depressed. Alton is not unfair. Calvert is unfair. Alton is not shiny. Rachelle is unfair. Calvert is desperate. Caldwell is unfair. Calvert is not scary. Rachelle is desperate.If Alton is available, then Caldwell is not scary and Rachelle is depressed, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is both not shiny and not available, then Kerwin is desperate. If someone is not depressed, then he is available. Alton is not shiny if and only if Rachelle is not unfair. If there is someone who is either not shiny or not available, then Orlando is desperate and Caldwell is unfair. If someone who is not unfair is also not available, then he is desperate. Someone is desperate and not shiny if and only if he is scary. If there is at least one people who is desperate, then Calvert is not unfair and Brooke is not depressed. It can be concluded that Caldwell is not available once knowing that Caldwell is scary or Rachelle is depressed. It can be concluded that Rachelle is scary once knowing that Kerwin is not unfair and Alton is depressed. It can be concluded that Orlando is not depressed once knowing that Alton is not available and Calvert is not desperate. If there is at least one people who is not unfair, then Calvert is scary and Brooke is available.
Caldwell is scary.
neutral
Kerwin is shiny. Kerwin is not unfair. Kerwin is not scary. Kerwin is depressed. Alton is not unfair. Calvert is unfair. Alton is not shiny. Rachelle is unfair. Calvert is desperate. Caldwell is unfair. Calvert is not scary. Rachelle is desperate.If Alton is available, then Caldwell is not scary and Rachelle is depressed, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is both not shiny and not available, then Kerwin is desperate. If someone is not depressed, then he is available. Alton is not shiny if and only if Rachelle is not unfair. If there is someone who is either not shiny or not available, then Orlando is desperate and Caldwell is unfair. If someone who is not unfair is also not available, then he is desperate. Someone is desperate and not shiny if and only if he is scary. If there is at least one people who is desperate, then Calvert is not unfair and Brooke is not depressed. It can be concluded that Caldwell is not available once knowing that Caldwell is scary or Rachelle is depressed. It can be concluded that Rachelle is scary once knowing that Kerwin is not unfair and Alton is depressed. It can be concluded that Orlando is not depressed once knowing that Alton is not available and Calvert is not desperate. If there is at least one people who is not unfair, then Calvert is scary and Brooke is available.
Brooke is available.
entailment
Kerwin is shiny. Kerwin is not unfair. Kerwin is not scary. Kerwin is depressed. Alton is not unfair. Calvert is unfair. Alton is not shiny. Rachelle is unfair. Calvert is desperate. Caldwell is unfair. Calvert is not scary. Rachelle is desperate.If Alton is available, then Caldwell is not scary and Rachelle is depressed, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is both not shiny and not available, then Kerwin is desperate. If someone is not depressed, then he is available. Alton is not shiny if and only if Rachelle is not unfair. If there is someone who is either not shiny or not available, then Orlando is desperate and Caldwell is unfair. If someone who is not unfair is also not available, then he is desperate. Someone is desperate and not shiny if and only if he is scary. If there is at least one people who is desperate, then Calvert is not unfair and Brooke is not depressed. It can be concluded that Caldwell is not available once knowing that Caldwell is scary or Rachelle is depressed. It can be concluded that Rachelle is scary once knowing that Kerwin is not unfair and Alton is depressed. It can be concluded that Orlando is not depressed once knowing that Alton is not available and Calvert is not desperate. If there is at least one people who is not unfair, then Calvert is scary and Brooke is available.
Caldwell is not unfair.
contradiction
Kerwin is shiny. Kerwin is not unfair. Kerwin is not scary. Kerwin is depressed. Alton is not unfair. Calvert is unfair. Alton is not shiny. Rachelle is unfair. Calvert is desperate. Caldwell is unfair. Calvert is not scary. Rachelle is desperate.If Alton is available, then Caldwell is not scary and Rachelle is depressed, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is both not shiny and not available, then Kerwin is desperate. If someone is not depressed, then he is available. Alton is not shiny if and only if Rachelle is not unfair. If there is someone who is either not shiny or not available, then Orlando is desperate and Caldwell is unfair. If someone who is not unfair is also not available, then he is desperate. Someone is desperate and not shiny if and only if he is scary. If there is at least one people who is desperate, then Calvert is not unfair and Brooke is not depressed. It can be concluded that Caldwell is not available once knowing that Caldwell is scary or Rachelle is depressed. It can be concluded that Rachelle is scary once knowing that Kerwin is not unfair and Alton is depressed. It can be concluded that Orlando is not depressed once knowing that Alton is not available and Calvert is not desperate. If there is at least one people who is not unfair, then Calvert is scary and Brooke is available.
Calvert is desperate.
entailment
Kerwin is shiny. Kerwin is not unfair. Kerwin is not scary. Kerwin is depressed. Alton is not unfair. Calvert is unfair. Alton is not shiny. Rachelle is unfair. Calvert is desperate. Caldwell is unfair. Calvert is not scary. Rachelle is desperate.If Alton is available, then Caldwell is not scary and Rachelle is depressed, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is both not shiny and not available, then Kerwin is desperate. If someone is not depressed, then he is available. Alton is not shiny if and only if Rachelle is not unfair. If there is someone who is either not shiny or not available, then Orlando is desperate and Caldwell is unfair. If someone who is not unfair is also not available, then he is desperate. Someone is desperate and not shiny if and only if he is scary. If there is at least one people who is desperate, then Calvert is not unfair and Brooke is not depressed. It can be concluded that Caldwell is not available once knowing that Caldwell is scary or Rachelle is depressed. It can be concluded that Rachelle is scary once knowing that Kerwin is not unfair and Alton is depressed. It can be concluded that Orlando is not depressed once knowing that Alton is not available and Calvert is not desperate. If there is at least one people who is not unfair, then Calvert is scary and Brooke is available.
Rachelle is desperate.
entailment
Kerwin is shiny. Kerwin is not unfair. Kerwin is not scary. Kerwin is depressed. Alton is not unfair. Calvert is unfair. Alton is not shiny. Rachelle is unfair. Calvert is desperate. Caldwell is unfair. Calvert is not scary. Rachelle is desperate.If Alton is available, then Caldwell is not scary and Rachelle is depressed, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is both not shiny and not available, then Kerwin is desperate. If someone is not depressed, then he is available. Alton is not shiny if and only if Rachelle is not unfair. If there is someone who is either not shiny or not available, then Orlando is desperate and Caldwell is unfair. If someone who is not unfair is also not available, then he is desperate. Someone is desperate and not shiny if and only if he is scary. If there is at least one people who is desperate, then Calvert is not unfair and Brooke is not depressed. It can be concluded that Caldwell is not available once knowing that Caldwell is scary or Rachelle is depressed. It can be concluded that Rachelle is scary once knowing that Kerwin is not unfair and Alton is depressed. It can be concluded that Orlando is not depressed once knowing that Alton is not available and Calvert is not desperate. If there is at least one people who is not unfair, then Calvert is scary and Brooke is available.
Caldwell is not available.
neutral
Kerwin is shiny. Kerwin is not unfair. Kerwin is not scary. Kerwin is depressed. Alton is not unfair. Calvert is unfair. Alton is not shiny. Rachelle is unfair. Calvert is desperate. Caldwell is unfair. Calvert is not scary. Rachelle is desperate.If Alton is available, then Caldwell is not scary and Rachelle is depressed, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is both not shiny and not available, then Kerwin is desperate. If someone is not depressed, then he is available. Alton is not shiny if and only if Rachelle is not unfair. If there is someone who is either not shiny or not available, then Orlando is desperate and Caldwell is unfair. If someone who is not unfair is also not available, then he is desperate. Someone is desperate and not shiny if and only if he is scary. If there is at least one people who is desperate, then Calvert is not unfair and Brooke is not depressed. It can be concluded that Caldwell is not available once knowing that Caldwell is scary or Rachelle is depressed. It can be concluded that Rachelle is scary once knowing that Kerwin is not unfair and Alton is depressed. It can be concluded that Orlando is not depressed once knowing that Alton is not available and Calvert is not desperate. If there is at least one people who is not unfair, then Calvert is scary and Brooke is available.
Kerwin is unfair.
contradiction
Kerwin is shiny. Kerwin is not unfair. Kerwin is not scary. Kerwin is depressed. Alton is not unfair. Calvert is unfair. Alton is not shiny. Rachelle is unfair. Calvert is desperate. Caldwell is unfair. Calvert is not scary. Rachelle is desperate.If Alton is available, then Caldwell is not scary and Rachelle is depressed, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is both not shiny and not available, then Kerwin is desperate. If someone is not depressed, then he is available. Alton is not shiny if and only if Rachelle is not unfair. If there is someone who is either not shiny or not available, then Orlando is desperate and Caldwell is unfair. If someone who is not unfair is also not available, then he is desperate. Someone is desperate and not shiny if and only if he is scary. If there is at least one people who is desperate, then Calvert is not unfair and Brooke is not depressed. It can be concluded that Caldwell is not available once knowing that Caldwell is scary or Rachelle is depressed. It can be concluded that Rachelle is scary once knowing that Kerwin is not unfair and Alton is depressed. It can be concluded that Orlando is not depressed once knowing that Alton is not available and Calvert is not desperate. If there is at least one people who is not unfair, then Calvert is scary and Brooke is available.
Calvert is not unfair.
self_contradiction
Kerwin is shiny. Kerwin is not unfair. Kerwin is not scary. Kerwin is depressed. Alton is not unfair. Calvert is unfair. Alton is not shiny. Rachelle is unfair. Calvert is desperate. Caldwell is unfair. Calvert is not scary. Rachelle is desperate.If Alton is available, then Caldwell is not scary and Rachelle is depressed, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is both not shiny and not available, then Kerwin is desperate. If someone is not depressed, then he is available. Alton is not shiny if and only if Rachelle is not unfair. If there is someone who is either not shiny or not available, then Orlando is desperate and Caldwell is unfair. If someone who is not unfair is also not available, then he is desperate. Someone is desperate and not shiny if and only if he is scary. If there is at least one people who is desperate, then Calvert is not unfair and Brooke is not depressed. It can be concluded that Caldwell is not available once knowing that Caldwell is scary or Rachelle is depressed. It can be concluded that Rachelle is scary once knowing that Kerwin is not unfair and Alton is depressed. It can be concluded that Orlando is not depressed once knowing that Alton is not available and Calvert is not desperate. If there is at least one people who is not unfair, then Calvert is scary and Brooke is available.
Calvert is not scary.
self_contradiction
Kerwin is shiny. Kerwin is not unfair. Kerwin is not scary. Kerwin is depressed. Alton is not unfair. Calvert is unfair. Alton is not shiny. Rachelle is unfair. Calvert is desperate. Caldwell is unfair. Calvert is not scary. Rachelle is desperate.If Alton is available, then Caldwell is not scary and Rachelle is depressed, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is both not shiny and not available, then Kerwin is desperate. If someone is not depressed, then he is available. Alton is not shiny if and only if Rachelle is not unfair. If there is someone who is either not shiny or not available, then Orlando is desperate and Caldwell is unfair. If someone who is not unfair is also not available, then he is desperate. Someone is desperate and not shiny if and only if he is scary. If there is at least one people who is desperate, then Calvert is not unfair and Brooke is not depressed. It can be concluded that Caldwell is not available once knowing that Caldwell is scary or Rachelle is depressed. It can be concluded that Rachelle is scary once knowing that Kerwin is not unfair and Alton is depressed. It can be concluded that Orlando is not depressed once knowing that Alton is not available and Calvert is not desperate. If there is at least one people who is not unfair, then Calvert is scary and Brooke is available.
Caldwell is unfair.
entailment
Kerwin is shiny. Kerwin is not unfair. Kerwin is not scary. Kerwin is depressed. Alton is not unfair. Calvert is unfair. Alton is not shiny. Rachelle is unfair. Calvert is desperate. Caldwell is unfair. Calvert is not scary. Rachelle is desperate.If Alton is available, then Caldwell is not scary and Rachelle is depressed, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is both not shiny and not available, then Kerwin is desperate. If someone is not depressed, then he is available. Alton is not shiny if and only if Rachelle is not unfair. If there is someone who is either not shiny or not available, then Orlando is desperate and Caldwell is unfair. If someone who is not unfair is also not available, then he is desperate. Someone is desperate and not shiny if and only if he is scary. If there is at least one people who is desperate, then Calvert is not unfair and Brooke is not depressed. It can be concluded that Caldwell is not available once knowing that Caldwell is scary or Rachelle is depressed. It can be concluded that Rachelle is scary once knowing that Kerwin is not unfair and Alton is depressed. It can be concluded that Orlando is not depressed once knowing that Alton is not available and Calvert is not desperate. If there is at least one people who is not unfair, then Calvert is scary and Brooke is available.
Orlando is scary.
neutral
Arvel is not fuzzy. Randolph is friendly. Olaf is not emotional. Horace is fuzzy. Rick is not thankful. Harmony is thankful. Rick is fuzzy. Joshua is not emotional. Olaf is disturbed. Arvel is not emotional. Joshua is friendly. Joshua is not disturbed.Someone who is disturbed is always not emotional. It can be concluded that Arvel is disturbed once knowing that Rick is not modern. If Horace is modern, then Arvel is disturbed, and vice versa. If someone is not emotional and not friendly, then he is both modern and fuzzy, and vice versa. Someone being thankful is equivalent to being modern. If someone who is emotional is also thankful, then he is modern. If there is at least one people who is either thankful or not disturbed, then Horace is not friendly and Harmony is fuzzy. Someone who is not emotional is always both not disturbed and modern. All not emotional people are friendly. If there is at least one people who is thankful, then Joshua is not fuzzy. It can be concluded that Rick is fuzzy once knowing that Rick is not emotional and Joshua is not thankful. If Olaf is friendly or Olaf is emotional, then Joshua is fuzzy.
Olaf is disturbed.
self_contradiction
Arvel is not fuzzy. Randolph is friendly. Olaf is not emotional. Horace is fuzzy. Rick is not thankful. Harmony is thankful. Rick is fuzzy. Joshua is not emotional. Olaf is disturbed. Arvel is not emotional. Joshua is friendly. Joshua is not disturbed.Someone who is disturbed is always not emotional. It can be concluded that Arvel is disturbed once knowing that Rick is not modern. If Horace is modern, then Arvel is disturbed, and vice versa. If someone is not emotional and not friendly, then he is both modern and fuzzy, and vice versa. Someone being thankful is equivalent to being modern. If someone who is emotional is also thankful, then he is modern. If there is at least one people who is either thankful or not disturbed, then Horace is not friendly and Harmony is fuzzy. Someone who is not emotional is always both not disturbed and modern. All not emotional people are friendly. If there is at least one people who is thankful, then Joshua is not fuzzy. It can be concluded that Rick is fuzzy once knowing that Rick is not emotional and Joshua is not thankful. If Olaf is friendly or Olaf is emotional, then Joshua is fuzzy.
Olaf is not disturbed.
self_contradiction
Arvel is not fuzzy. Randolph is friendly. Olaf is not emotional. Horace is fuzzy. Rick is not thankful. Harmony is thankful. Rick is fuzzy. Joshua is not emotional. Olaf is disturbed. Arvel is not emotional. Joshua is friendly. Joshua is not disturbed.Someone who is disturbed is always not emotional. It can be concluded that Arvel is disturbed once knowing that Rick is not modern. If Horace is modern, then Arvel is disturbed, and vice versa. If someone is not emotional and not friendly, then he is both modern and fuzzy, and vice versa. Someone being thankful is equivalent to being modern. If someone who is emotional is also thankful, then he is modern. If there is at least one people who is either thankful or not disturbed, then Horace is not friendly and Harmony is fuzzy. Someone who is not emotional is always both not disturbed and modern. All not emotional people are friendly. If there is at least one people who is thankful, then Joshua is not fuzzy. It can be concluded that Rick is fuzzy once knowing that Rick is not emotional and Joshua is not thankful. If Olaf is friendly or Olaf is emotional, then Joshua is fuzzy.
Joshua is emotional.
contradiction
Arvel is not fuzzy. Randolph is friendly. Olaf is not emotional. Horace is fuzzy. Rick is not thankful. Harmony is thankful. Rick is fuzzy. Joshua is not emotional. Olaf is disturbed. Arvel is not emotional. Joshua is friendly. Joshua is not disturbed.Someone who is disturbed is always not emotional. It can be concluded that Arvel is disturbed once knowing that Rick is not modern. If Horace is modern, then Arvel is disturbed, and vice versa. If someone is not emotional and not friendly, then he is both modern and fuzzy, and vice versa. Someone being thankful is equivalent to being modern. If someone who is emotional is also thankful, then he is modern. If there is at least one people who is either thankful or not disturbed, then Horace is not friendly and Harmony is fuzzy. Someone who is not emotional is always both not disturbed and modern. All not emotional people are friendly. If there is at least one people who is thankful, then Joshua is not fuzzy. It can be concluded that Rick is fuzzy once knowing that Rick is not emotional and Joshua is not thankful. If Olaf is friendly or Olaf is emotional, then Joshua is fuzzy.
Joshua is not fuzzy.
self_contradiction
Arvel is not fuzzy. Randolph is friendly. Olaf is not emotional. Horace is fuzzy. Rick is not thankful. Harmony is thankful. Rick is fuzzy. Joshua is not emotional. Olaf is disturbed. Arvel is not emotional. Joshua is friendly. Joshua is not disturbed.Someone who is disturbed is always not emotional. It can be concluded that Arvel is disturbed once knowing that Rick is not modern. If Horace is modern, then Arvel is disturbed, and vice versa. If someone is not emotional and not friendly, then he is both modern and fuzzy, and vice versa. Someone being thankful is equivalent to being modern. If someone who is emotional is also thankful, then he is modern. If there is at least one people who is either thankful or not disturbed, then Horace is not friendly and Harmony is fuzzy. Someone who is not emotional is always both not disturbed and modern. All not emotional people are friendly. If there is at least one people who is thankful, then Joshua is not fuzzy. It can be concluded that Rick is fuzzy once knowing that Rick is not emotional and Joshua is not thankful. If Olaf is friendly or Olaf is emotional, then Joshua is fuzzy.
Joshua is fuzzy.
self_contradiction
Arvel is not fuzzy. Randolph is friendly. Olaf is not emotional. Horace is fuzzy. Rick is not thankful. Harmony is thankful. Rick is fuzzy. Joshua is not emotional. Olaf is disturbed. Arvel is not emotional. Joshua is friendly. Joshua is not disturbed.Someone who is disturbed is always not emotional. It can be concluded that Arvel is disturbed once knowing that Rick is not modern. If Horace is modern, then Arvel is disturbed, and vice versa. If someone is not emotional and not friendly, then he is both modern and fuzzy, and vice versa. Someone being thankful is equivalent to being modern. If someone who is emotional is also thankful, then he is modern. If there is at least one people who is either thankful or not disturbed, then Horace is not friendly and Harmony is fuzzy. Someone who is not emotional is always both not disturbed and modern. All not emotional people are friendly. If there is at least one people who is thankful, then Joshua is not fuzzy. It can be concluded that Rick is fuzzy once knowing that Rick is not emotional and Joshua is not thankful. If Olaf is friendly or Olaf is emotional, then Joshua is fuzzy.
Arvel is emotional.
contradiction
Arvel is not fuzzy. Randolph is friendly. Olaf is not emotional. Horace is fuzzy. Rick is not thankful. Harmony is thankful. Rick is fuzzy. Joshua is not emotional. Olaf is disturbed. Arvel is not emotional. Joshua is friendly. Joshua is not disturbed.Someone who is disturbed is always not emotional. It can be concluded that Arvel is disturbed once knowing that Rick is not modern. If Horace is modern, then Arvel is disturbed, and vice versa. If someone is not emotional and not friendly, then he is both modern and fuzzy, and vice versa. Someone being thankful is equivalent to being modern. If someone who is emotional is also thankful, then he is modern. If there is at least one people who is either thankful or not disturbed, then Horace is not friendly and Harmony is fuzzy. Someone who is not emotional is always both not disturbed and modern. All not emotional people are friendly. If there is at least one people who is thankful, then Joshua is not fuzzy. It can be concluded that Rick is fuzzy once knowing that Rick is not emotional and Joshua is not thankful. If Olaf is friendly or Olaf is emotional, then Joshua is fuzzy.
Joshua is not disturbed.
entailment
Arvel is not fuzzy. Randolph is friendly. Olaf is not emotional. Horace is fuzzy. Rick is not thankful. Harmony is thankful. Rick is fuzzy. Joshua is not emotional. Olaf is disturbed. Arvel is not emotional. Joshua is friendly. Joshua is not disturbed.Someone who is disturbed is always not emotional. It can be concluded that Arvel is disturbed once knowing that Rick is not modern. If Horace is modern, then Arvel is disturbed, and vice versa. If someone is not emotional and not friendly, then he is both modern and fuzzy, and vice versa. Someone being thankful is equivalent to being modern. If someone who is emotional is also thankful, then he is modern. If there is at least one people who is either thankful or not disturbed, then Horace is not friendly and Harmony is fuzzy. Someone who is not emotional is always both not disturbed and modern. All not emotional people are friendly. If there is at least one people who is thankful, then Joshua is not fuzzy. It can be concluded that Rick is fuzzy once knowing that Rick is not emotional and Joshua is not thankful. If Olaf is friendly or Olaf is emotional, then Joshua is fuzzy.
Horace is not emotional.
neutral
Arvel is not fuzzy. Randolph is friendly. Olaf is not emotional. Horace is fuzzy. Rick is not thankful. Harmony is thankful. Rick is fuzzy. Joshua is not emotional. Olaf is disturbed. Arvel is not emotional. Joshua is friendly. Joshua is not disturbed.Someone who is disturbed is always not emotional. It can be concluded that Arvel is disturbed once knowing that Rick is not modern. If Horace is modern, then Arvel is disturbed, and vice versa. If someone is not emotional and not friendly, then he is both modern and fuzzy, and vice versa. Someone being thankful is equivalent to being modern. If someone who is emotional is also thankful, then he is modern. If there is at least one people who is either thankful or not disturbed, then Horace is not friendly and Harmony is fuzzy. Someone who is not emotional is always both not disturbed and modern. All not emotional people are friendly. If there is at least one people who is thankful, then Joshua is not fuzzy. It can be concluded that Rick is fuzzy once knowing that Rick is not emotional and Joshua is not thankful. If Olaf is friendly or Olaf is emotional, then Joshua is fuzzy.
Harmony is not emotional.
entailment
Arvel is not fuzzy. Randolph is friendly. Olaf is not emotional. Horace is fuzzy. Rick is not thankful. Harmony is thankful. Rick is fuzzy. Joshua is not emotional. Olaf is disturbed. Arvel is not emotional. Joshua is friendly. Joshua is not disturbed.Someone who is disturbed is always not emotional. It can be concluded that Arvel is disturbed once knowing that Rick is not modern. If Horace is modern, then Arvel is disturbed, and vice versa. If someone is not emotional and not friendly, then he is both modern and fuzzy, and vice versa. Someone being thankful is equivalent to being modern. If someone who is emotional is also thankful, then he is modern. If there is at least one people who is either thankful or not disturbed, then Horace is not friendly and Harmony is fuzzy. Someone who is not emotional is always both not disturbed and modern. All not emotional people are friendly. If there is at least one people who is thankful, then Joshua is not fuzzy. It can be concluded that Rick is fuzzy once knowing that Rick is not emotional and Joshua is not thankful. If Olaf is friendly or Olaf is emotional, then Joshua is fuzzy.
Arvel is not thankful.
contradiction
Arvel is not fuzzy. Randolph is friendly. Olaf is not emotional. Horace is fuzzy. Rick is not thankful. Harmony is thankful. Rick is fuzzy. Joshua is not emotional. Olaf is disturbed. Arvel is not emotional. Joshua is friendly. Joshua is not disturbed.Someone who is disturbed is always not emotional. It can be concluded that Arvel is disturbed once knowing that Rick is not modern. If Horace is modern, then Arvel is disturbed, and vice versa. If someone is not emotional and not friendly, then he is both modern and fuzzy, and vice versa. Someone being thankful is equivalent to being modern. If someone who is emotional is also thankful, then he is modern. If there is at least one people who is either thankful or not disturbed, then Horace is not friendly and Harmony is fuzzy. Someone who is not emotional is always both not disturbed and modern. All not emotional people are friendly. If there is at least one people who is thankful, then Joshua is not fuzzy. It can be concluded that Rick is fuzzy once knowing that Rick is not emotional and Joshua is not thankful. If Olaf is friendly or Olaf is emotional, then Joshua is fuzzy.
Rick is not modern.
neutral
Arvel is not fuzzy. Randolph is friendly. Olaf is not emotional. Horace is fuzzy. Rick is not thankful. Harmony is thankful. Rick is fuzzy. Joshua is not emotional. Olaf is disturbed. Arvel is not emotional. Joshua is friendly. Joshua is not disturbed.Someone who is disturbed is always not emotional. It can be concluded that Arvel is disturbed once knowing that Rick is not modern. If Horace is modern, then Arvel is disturbed, and vice versa. If someone is not emotional and not friendly, then he is both modern and fuzzy, and vice versa. Someone being thankful is equivalent to being modern. If someone who is emotional is also thankful, then he is modern. If there is at least one people who is either thankful or not disturbed, then Horace is not friendly and Harmony is fuzzy. Someone who is not emotional is always both not disturbed and modern. All not emotional people are friendly. If there is at least one people who is thankful, then Joshua is not fuzzy. It can be concluded that Rick is fuzzy once knowing that Rick is not emotional and Joshua is not thankful. If Olaf is friendly or Olaf is emotional, then Joshua is fuzzy.
Joshua is friendly.
self_contradiction
Arvel is not fuzzy. Randolph is friendly. Olaf is not emotional. Horace is fuzzy. Rick is not thankful. Harmony is thankful. Rick is fuzzy. Joshua is not emotional. Olaf is disturbed. Arvel is not emotional. Joshua is friendly. Joshua is not disturbed.Someone who is disturbed is always not emotional. It can be concluded that Arvel is disturbed once knowing that Rick is not modern. If Horace is modern, then Arvel is disturbed, and vice versa. If someone is not emotional and not friendly, then he is both modern and fuzzy, and vice versa. Someone being thankful is equivalent to being modern. If someone who is emotional is also thankful, then he is modern. If there is at least one people who is either thankful or not disturbed, then Horace is not friendly and Harmony is fuzzy. Someone who is not emotional is always both not disturbed and modern. All not emotional people are friendly. If there is at least one people who is thankful, then Joshua is not fuzzy. It can be concluded that Rick is fuzzy once knowing that Rick is not emotional and Joshua is not thankful. If Olaf is friendly or Olaf is emotional, then Joshua is fuzzy.
Horace is fuzzy.
entailment
Arvel is not fuzzy. Randolph is friendly. Olaf is not emotional. Horace is fuzzy. Rick is not thankful. Harmony is thankful. Rick is fuzzy. Joshua is not emotional. Olaf is disturbed. Arvel is not emotional. Joshua is friendly. Joshua is not disturbed.Someone who is disturbed is always not emotional. It can be concluded that Arvel is disturbed once knowing that Rick is not modern. If Horace is modern, then Arvel is disturbed, and vice versa. If someone is not emotional and not friendly, then he is both modern and fuzzy, and vice versa. Someone being thankful is equivalent to being modern. If someone who is emotional is also thankful, then he is modern. If there is at least one people who is either thankful or not disturbed, then Horace is not friendly and Harmony is fuzzy. Someone who is not emotional is always both not disturbed and modern. All not emotional people are friendly. If there is at least one people who is thankful, then Joshua is not fuzzy. It can be concluded that Rick is fuzzy once knowing that Rick is not emotional and Joshua is not thankful. If Olaf is friendly or Olaf is emotional, then Joshua is fuzzy.
Randolph is emotional.
neutral
Arvel is not fuzzy. Randolph is friendly. Olaf is not emotional. Horace is fuzzy. Rick is not thankful. Harmony is thankful. Rick is fuzzy. Joshua is not emotional. Olaf is disturbed. Arvel is not emotional. Joshua is friendly. Joshua is not disturbed.Someone who is disturbed is always not emotional. It can be concluded that Arvel is disturbed once knowing that Rick is not modern. If Horace is modern, then Arvel is disturbed, and vice versa. If someone is not emotional and not friendly, then he is both modern and fuzzy, and vice versa. Someone being thankful is equivalent to being modern. If someone who is emotional is also thankful, then he is modern. If there is at least one people who is either thankful or not disturbed, then Horace is not friendly and Harmony is fuzzy. Someone who is not emotional is always both not disturbed and modern. All not emotional people are friendly. If there is at least one people who is thankful, then Joshua is not fuzzy. It can be concluded that Rick is fuzzy once knowing that Rick is not emotional and Joshua is not thankful. If Olaf is friendly or Olaf is emotional, then Joshua is fuzzy.
Arvel is thankful.
entailment
Arvel is not fuzzy. Randolph is friendly. Olaf is not emotional. Horace is fuzzy. Rick is not thankful. Harmony is thankful. Rick is fuzzy. Joshua is not emotional. Olaf is disturbed. Arvel is not emotional. Joshua is friendly. Joshua is not disturbed.Someone who is disturbed is always not emotional. It can be concluded that Arvel is disturbed once knowing that Rick is not modern. If Horace is modern, then Arvel is disturbed, and vice versa. If someone is not emotional and not friendly, then he is both modern and fuzzy, and vice versa. Someone being thankful is equivalent to being modern. If someone who is emotional is also thankful, then he is modern. If there is at least one people who is either thankful or not disturbed, then Horace is not friendly and Harmony is fuzzy. Someone who is not emotional is always both not disturbed and modern. All not emotional people are friendly. If there is at least one people who is thankful, then Joshua is not fuzzy. It can be concluded that Rick is fuzzy once knowing that Rick is not emotional and Joshua is not thankful. If Olaf is friendly or Olaf is emotional, then Joshua is fuzzy.
Rick is not thankful.
entailment
Arvel is not fuzzy. Randolph is friendly. Olaf is not emotional. Horace is fuzzy. Rick is not thankful. Harmony is thankful. Rick is fuzzy. Joshua is not emotional. Olaf is disturbed. Arvel is not emotional. Joshua is friendly. Joshua is not disturbed.Someone who is disturbed is always not emotional. It can be concluded that Arvel is disturbed once knowing that Rick is not modern. If Horace is modern, then Arvel is disturbed, and vice versa. If someone is not emotional and not friendly, then he is both modern and fuzzy, and vice versa. Someone being thankful is equivalent to being modern. If someone who is emotional is also thankful, then he is modern. If there is at least one people who is either thankful or not disturbed, then Horace is not friendly and Harmony is fuzzy. Someone who is not emotional is always both not disturbed and modern. All not emotional people are friendly. If there is at least one people who is thankful, then Joshua is not fuzzy. It can be concluded that Rick is fuzzy once knowing that Rick is not emotional and Joshua is not thankful. If Olaf is friendly or Olaf is emotional, then Joshua is fuzzy.
Horace is modern.
neutral
Arvel is not fuzzy. Randolph is friendly. Olaf is not emotional. Horace is fuzzy. Rick is not thankful. Harmony is thankful. Rick is fuzzy. Joshua is not emotional. Olaf is disturbed. Arvel is not emotional. Joshua is friendly. Joshua is not disturbed.Someone who is disturbed is always not emotional. It can be concluded that Arvel is disturbed once knowing that Rick is not modern. If Horace is modern, then Arvel is disturbed, and vice versa. If someone is not emotional and not friendly, then he is both modern and fuzzy, and vice versa. Someone being thankful is equivalent to being modern. If someone who is emotional is also thankful, then he is modern. If there is at least one people who is either thankful or not disturbed, then Horace is not friendly and Harmony is fuzzy. Someone who is not emotional is always both not disturbed and modern. All not emotional people are friendly. If there is at least one people who is thankful, then Joshua is not fuzzy. It can be concluded that Rick is fuzzy once knowing that Rick is not emotional and Joshua is not thankful. If Olaf is friendly or Olaf is emotional, then Joshua is fuzzy.
Arvel is not friendly.
contradiction
Arvel is not fuzzy. Randolph is friendly. Olaf is not emotional. Horace is fuzzy. Rick is not thankful. Harmony is thankful. Rick is fuzzy. Joshua is not emotional. Olaf is disturbed. Arvel is not emotional. Joshua is friendly. Joshua is not disturbed.Someone who is disturbed is always not emotional. It can be concluded that Arvel is disturbed once knowing that Rick is not modern. If Horace is modern, then Arvel is disturbed, and vice versa. If someone is not emotional and not friendly, then he is both modern and fuzzy, and vice versa. Someone being thankful is equivalent to being modern. If someone who is emotional is also thankful, then he is modern. If there is at least one people who is either thankful or not disturbed, then Horace is not friendly and Harmony is fuzzy. Someone who is not emotional is always both not disturbed and modern. All not emotional people are friendly. If there is at least one people who is thankful, then Joshua is not fuzzy. It can be concluded that Rick is fuzzy once knowing that Rick is not emotional and Joshua is not thankful. If Olaf is friendly or Olaf is emotional, then Joshua is fuzzy.
Olaf is not modern.
contradiction
Arvel is not fuzzy. Randolph is friendly. Olaf is not emotional. Horace is fuzzy. Rick is not thankful. Harmony is thankful. Rick is fuzzy. Joshua is not emotional. Olaf is disturbed. Arvel is not emotional. Joshua is friendly. Joshua is not disturbed.Someone who is disturbed is always not emotional. It can be concluded that Arvel is disturbed once knowing that Rick is not modern. If Horace is modern, then Arvel is disturbed, and vice versa. If someone is not emotional and not friendly, then he is both modern and fuzzy, and vice versa. Someone being thankful is equivalent to being modern. If someone who is emotional is also thankful, then he is modern. If there is at least one people who is either thankful or not disturbed, then Horace is not friendly and Harmony is fuzzy. Someone who is not emotional is always both not disturbed and modern. All not emotional people are friendly. If there is at least one people who is thankful, then Joshua is not fuzzy. It can be concluded that Rick is fuzzy once knowing that Rick is not emotional and Joshua is not thankful. If Olaf is friendly or Olaf is emotional, then Joshua is fuzzy.
Randolph is not modern.
neutral
Silas is light. Marcus is not timid. Marcus is popular. Marcus is light. Lucille is not unable. Curt is loyal. Brock is unable. Jed is loyal. Curt is unable. Garth is light. Brock is not shiny. Jed is popular.If there is at least one people who is popular, then Curt is not unable. If there is someone who is loyal, then Brock is timid and Lucille is not popular. If there is someone who is timid, then Marcus is unable and Lucille is loyal. Garth being not shiny is equivalent to Jed being not unable and Marcus being light. If someone who is not timid is also loyal, then he is not unable. If there is at least one people who is light or not shiny, then Silas is timid. If Lucille is light, then Brock is not popular. If Curt is not light, then Marcus is popular. Silas is light if and only if Silas is loyal and Brock is not unable. If someone is not timid, then he is loyal. If there is someone who is both unable and not timid, then Jed is shiny. Someone who is both not shiny and unable is always light.
Marcus is popular.
entailment
Silas is light. Marcus is not timid. Marcus is popular. Marcus is light. Lucille is not unable. Curt is loyal. Brock is unable. Jed is loyal. Curt is unable. Garth is light. Brock is not shiny. Jed is popular.If there is at least one people who is popular, then Curt is not unable. If there is someone who is loyal, then Brock is timid and Lucille is not popular. If there is someone who is timid, then Marcus is unable and Lucille is loyal. Garth being not shiny is equivalent to Jed being not unable and Marcus being light. If someone who is not timid is also loyal, then he is not unable. If there is at least one people who is light or not shiny, then Silas is timid. If Lucille is light, then Brock is not popular. If Curt is not light, then Marcus is popular. Silas is light if and only if Silas is loyal and Brock is not unable. If someone is not timid, then he is loyal. If there is someone who is both unable and not timid, then Jed is shiny. Someone who is both not shiny and unable is always light.
Lucille is not loyal.
contradiction
Silas is light. Marcus is not timid. Marcus is popular. Marcus is light. Lucille is not unable. Curt is loyal. Brock is unable. Jed is loyal. Curt is unable. Garth is light. Brock is not shiny. Jed is popular.If there is at least one people who is popular, then Curt is not unable. If there is someone who is loyal, then Brock is timid and Lucille is not popular. If there is someone who is timid, then Marcus is unable and Lucille is loyal. Garth being not shiny is equivalent to Jed being not unable and Marcus being light. If someone who is not timid is also loyal, then he is not unable. If there is at least one people who is light or not shiny, then Silas is timid. If Lucille is light, then Brock is not popular. If Curt is not light, then Marcus is popular. Silas is light if and only if Silas is loyal and Brock is not unable. If someone is not timid, then he is loyal. If there is someone who is both unable and not timid, then Jed is shiny. Someone who is both not shiny and unable is always light.
Garth is not light.
contradiction
Silas is light. Marcus is not timid. Marcus is popular. Marcus is light. Lucille is not unable. Curt is loyal. Brock is unable. Jed is loyal. Curt is unable. Garth is light. Brock is not shiny. Jed is popular.If there is at least one people who is popular, then Curt is not unable. If there is someone who is loyal, then Brock is timid and Lucille is not popular. If there is someone who is timid, then Marcus is unable and Lucille is loyal. Garth being not shiny is equivalent to Jed being not unable and Marcus being light. If someone who is not timid is also loyal, then he is not unable. If there is at least one people who is light or not shiny, then Silas is timid. If Lucille is light, then Brock is not popular. If Curt is not light, then Marcus is popular. Silas is light if and only if Silas is loyal and Brock is not unable. If someone is not timid, then he is loyal. If there is someone who is both unable and not timid, then Jed is shiny. Someone who is both not shiny and unable is always light.
Lucille is not unable.
entailment
Silas is light. Marcus is not timid. Marcus is popular. Marcus is light. Lucille is not unable. Curt is loyal. Brock is unable. Jed is loyal. Curt is unable. Garth is light. Brock is not shiny. Jed is popular.If there is at least one people who is popular, then Curt is not unable. If there is someone who is loyal, then Brock is timid and Lucille is not popular. If there is someone who is timid, then Marcus is unable and Lucille is loyal. Garth being not shiny is equivalent to Jed being not unable and Marcus being light. If someone who is not timid is also loyal, then he is not unable. If there is at least one people who is light or not shiny, then Silas is timid. If Lucille is light, then Brock is not popular. If Curt is not light, then Marcus is popular. Silas is light if and only if Silas is loyal and Brock is not unable. If someone is not timid, then he is loyal. If there is someone who is both unable and not timid, then Jed is shiny. Someone who is both not shiny and unable is always light.
Brock is popular.
neutral
Silas is light. Marcus is not timid. Marcus is popular. Marcus is light. Lucille is not unable. Curt is loyal. Brock is unable. Jed is loyal. Curt is unable. Garth is light. Brock is not shiny. Jed is popular.If there is at least one people who is popular, then Curt is not unable. If there is someone who is loyal, then Brock is timid and Lucille is not popular. If there is someone who is timid, then Marcus is unable and Lucille is loyal. Garth being not shiny is equivalent to Jed being not unable and Marcus being light. If someone who is not timid is also loyal, then he is not unable. If there is at least one people who is light or not shiny, then Silas is timid. If Lucille is light, then Brock is not popular. If Curt is not light, then Marcus is popular. Silas is light if and only if Silas is loyal and Brock is not unable. If someone is not timid, then he is loyal. If there is someone who is both unable and not timid, then Jed is shiny. Someone who is both not shiny and unable is always light.
Curt is not unable.
self_contradiction
Silas is light. Marcus is not timid. Marcus is popular. Marcus is light. Lucille is not unable. Curt is loyal. Brock is unable. Jed is loyal. Curt is unable. Garth is light. Brock is not shiny. Jed is popular.If there is at least one people who is popular, then Curt is not unable. If there is someone who is loyal, then Brock is timid and Lucille is not popular. If there is someone who is timid, then Marcus is unable and Lucille is loyal. Garth being not shiny is equivalent to Jed being not unable and Marcus being light. If someone who is not timid is also loyal, then he is not unable. If there is at least one people who is light or not shiny, then Silas is timid. If Lucille is light, then Brock is not popular. If Curt is not light, then Marcus is popular. Silas is light if and only if Silas is loyal and Brock is not unable. If someone is not timid, then he is loyal. If there is someone who is both unable and not timid, then Jed is shiny. Someone who is both not shiny and unable is always light.
Jed is timid.
neutral
Silas is light. Marcus is not timid. Marcus is popular. Marcus is light. Lucille is not unable. Curt is loyal. Brock is unable. Jed is loyal. Curt is unable. Garth is light. Brock is not shiny. Jed is popular.If there is at least one people who is popular, then Curt is not unable. If there is someone who is loyal, then Brock is timid and Lucille is not popular. If there is someone who is timid, then Marcus is unable and Lucille is loyal. Garth being not shiny is equivalent to Jed being not unable and Marcus being light. If someone who is not timid is also loyal, then he is not unable. If there is at least one people who is light or not shiny, then Silas is timid. If Lucille is light, then Brock is not popular. If Curt is not light, then Marcus is popular. Silas is light if and only if Silas is loyal and Brock is not unable. If someone is not timid, then he is loyal. If there is someone who is both unable and not timid, then Jed is shiny. Someone who is both not shiny and unable is always light.
Brock is timid.
entailment
Silas is light. Marcus is not timid. Marcus is popular. Marcus is light. Lucille is not unable. Curt is loyal. Brock is unable. Jed is loyal. Curt is unable. Garth is light. Brock is not shiny. Jed is popular.If there is at least one people who is popular, then Curt is not unable. If there is someone who is loyal, then Brock is timid and Lucille is not popular. If there is someone who is timid, then Marcus is unable and Lucille is loyal. Garth being not shiny is equivalent to Jed being not unable and Marcus being light. If someone who is not timid is also loyal, then he is not unable. If there is at least one people who is light or not shiny, then Silas is timid. If Lucille is light, then Brock is not popular. If Curt is not light, then Marcus is popular. Silas is light if and only if Silas is loyal and Brock is not unable. If someone is not timid, then he is loyal. If there is someone who is both unable and not timid, then Jed is shiny. Someone who is both not shiny and unable is always light.
Curt is unable.
self_contradiction
Silas is light. Marcus is not timid. Marcus is popular. Marcus is light. Lucille is not unable. Curt is loyal. Brock is unable. Jed is loyal. Curt is unable. Garth is light. Brock is not shiny. Jed is popular.If there is at least one people who is popular, then Curt is not unable. If there is someone who is loyal, then Brock is timid and Lucille is not popular. If there is someone who is timid, then Marcus is unable and Lucille is loyal. Garth being not shiny is equivalent to Jed being not unable and Marcus being light. If someone who is not timid is also loyal, then he is not unable. If there is at least one people who is light or not shiny, then Silas is timid. If Lucille is light, then Brock is not popular. If Curt is not light, then Marcus is popular. Silas is light if and only if Silas is loyal and Brock is not unable. If someone is not timid, then he is loyal. If there is someone who is both unable and not timid, then Jed is shiny. Someone who is both not shiny and unable is always light.
Lucille is popular.
contradiction
Silas is light. Marcus is not timid. Marcus is popular. Marcus is light. Lucille is not unable. Curt is loyal. Brock is unable. Jed is loyal. Curt is unable. Garth is light. Brock is not shiny. Jed is popular.If there is at least one people who is popular, then Curt is not unable. If there is someone who is loyal, then Brock is timid and Lucille is not popular. If there is someone who is timid, then Marcus is unable and Lucille is loyal. Garth being not shiny is equivalent to Jed being not unable and Marcus being light. If someone who is not timid is also loyal, then he is not unable. If there is at least one people who is light or not shiny, then Silas is timid. If Lucille is light, then Brock is not popular. If Curt is not light, then Marcus is popular. Silas is light if and only if Silas is loyal and Brock is not unable. If someone is not timid, then he is loyal. If there is someone who is both unable and not timid, then Jed is shiny. Someone who is both not shiny and unable is always light.
Marcus is unable.
self_contradiction
Silas is light. Marcus is not timid. Marcus is popular. Marcus is light. Lucille is not unable. Curt is loyal. Brock is unable. Jed is loyal. Curt is unable. Garth is light. Brock is not shiny. Jed is popular.If there is at least one people who is popular, then Curt is not unable. If there is someone who is loyal, then Brock is timid and Lucille is not popular. If there is someone who is timid, then Marcus is unable and Lucille is loyal. Garth being not shiny is equivalent to Jed being not unable and Marcus being light. If someone who is not timid is also loyal, then he is not unable. If there is at least one people who is light or not shiny, then Silas is timid. If Lucille is light, then Brock is not popular. If Curt is not light, then Marcus is popular. Silas is light if and only if Silas is loyal and Brock is not unable. If someone is not timid, then he is loyal. If there is someone who is both unable and not timid, then Jed is shiny. Someone who is both not shiny and unable is always light.
Garth is unable.
neutral
Silas is light. Marcus is not timid. Marcus is popular. Marcus is light. Lucille is not unable. Curt is loyal. Brock is unable. Jed is loyal. Curt is unable. Garth is light. Brock is not shiny. Jed is popular.If there is at least one people who is popular, then Curt is not unable. If there is someone who is loyal, then Brock is timid and Lucille is not popular. If there is someone who is timid, then Marcus is unable and Lucille is loyal. Garth being not shiny is equivalent to Jed being not unable and Marcus being light. If someone who is not timid is also loyal, then he is not unable. If there is at least one people who is light or not shiny, then Silas is timid. If Lucille is light, then Brock is not popular. If Curt is not light, then Marcus is popular. Silas is light if and only if Silas is loyal and Brock is not unable. If someone is not timid, then he is loyal. If there is someone who is both unable and not timid, then Jed is shiny. Someone who is both not shiny and unable is always light.
Garth is light.
entailment
Silas is light. Marcus is not timid. Marcus is popular. Marcus is light. Lucille is not unable. Curt is loyal. Brock is unable. Jed is loyal. Curt is unable. Garth is light. Brock is not shiny. Jed is popular.If there is at least one people who is popular, then Curt is not unable. If there is someone who is loyal, then Brock is timid and Lucille is not popular. If there is someone who is timid, then Marcus is unable and Lucille is loyal. Garth being not shiny is equivalent to Jed being not unable and Marcus being light. If someone who is not timid is also loyal, then he is not unable. If there is at least one people who is light or not shiny, then Silas is timid. If Lucille is light, then Brock is not popular. If Curt is not light, then Marcus is popular. Silas is light if and only if Silas is loyal and Brock is not unable. If someone is not timid, then he is loyal. If there is someone who is both unable and not timid, then Jed is shiny. Someone who is both not shiny and unable is always light.
Silas is shiny.
neutral
Silas is light. Marcus is not timid. Marcus is popular. Marcus is light. Lucille is not unable. Curt is loyal. Brock is unable. Jed is loyal. Curt is unable. Garth is light. Brock is not shiny. Jed is popular.If there is at least one people who is popular, then Curt is not unable. If there is someone who is loyal, then Brock is timid and Lucille is not popular. If there is someone who is timid, then Marcus is unable and Lucille is loyal. Garth being not shiny is equivalent to Jed being not unable and Marcus being light. If someone who is not timid is also loyal, then he is not unable. If there is at least one people who is light or not shiny, then Silas is timid. If Lucille is light, then Brock is not popular. If Curt is not light, then Marcus is popular. Silas is light if and only if Silas is loyal and Brock is not unable. If someone is not timid, then he is loyal. If there is someone who is both unable and not timid, then Jed is shiny. Someone who is both not shiny and unable is always light.
Silas is not light.
contradiction
Silas is light. Marcus is not timid. Marcus is popular. Marcus is light. Lucille is not unable. Curt is loyal. Brock is unable. Jed is loyal. Curt is unable. Garth is light. Brock is not shiny. Jed is popular.If there is at least one people who is popular, then Curt is not unable. If there is someone who is loyal, then Brock is timid and Lucille is not popular. If there is someone who is timid, then Marcus is unable and Lucille is loyal. Garth being not shiny is equivalent to Jed being not unable and Marcus being light. If someone who is not timid is also loyal, then he is not unable. If there is at least one people who is light or not shiny, then Silas is timid. If Lucille is light, then Brock is not popular. If Curt is not light, then Marcus is popular. Silas is light if and only if Silas is loyal and Brock is not unable. If someone is not timid, then he is loyal. If there is someone who is both unable and not timid, then Jed is shiny. Someone who is both not shiny and unable is always light.
Jed is popular.
entailment
Silas is light. Marcus is not timid. Marcus is popular. Marcus is light. Lucille is not unable. Curt is loyal. Brock is unable. Jed is loyal. Curt is unable. Garth is light. Brock is not shiny. Jed is popular.If there is at least one people who is popular, then Curt is not unable. If there is someone who is loyal, then Brock is timid and Lucille is not popular. If there is someone who is timid, then Marcus is unable and Lucille is loyal. Garth being not shiny is equivalent to Jed being not unable and Marcus being light. If someone who is not timid is also loyal, then he is not unable. If there is at least one people who is light or not shiny, then Silas is timid. If Lucille is light, then Brock is not popular. If Curt is not light, then Marcus is popular. Silas is light if and only if Silas is loyal and Brock is not unable. If someone is not timid, then he is loyal. If there is someone who is both unable and not timid, then Jed is shiny. Someone who is both not shiny and unable is always light.
Brock is not unable.
self_contradiction
Silas is light. Marcus is not timid. Marcus is popular. Marcus is light. Lucille is not unable. Curt is loyal. Brock is unable. Jed is loyal. Curt is unable. Garth is light. Brock is not shiny. Jed is popular.If there is at least one people who is popular, then Curt is not unable. If there is someone who is loyal, then Brock is timid and Lucille is not popular. If there is someone who is timid, then Marcus is unable and Lucille is loyal. Garth being not shiny is equivalent to Jed being not unable and Marcus being light. If someone who is not timid is also loyal, then he is not unable. If there is at least one people who is light or not shiny, then Silas is timid. If Lucille is light, then Brock is not popular. If Curt is not light, then Marcus is popular. Silas is light if and only if Silas is loyal and Brock is not unable. If someone is not timid, then he is loyal. If there is someone who is both unable and not timid, then Jed is shiny. Someone who is both not shiny and unable is always light.
Curt is not loyal.
contradiction
Silas is light. Marcus is not timid. Marcus is popular. Marcus is light. Lucille is not unable. Curt is loyal. Brock is unable. Jed is loyal. Curt is unable. Garth is light. Brock is not shiny. Jed is popular.If there is at least one people who is popular, then Curt is not unable. If there is someone who is loyal, then Brock is timid and Lucille is not popular. If there is someone who is timid, then Marcus is unable and Lucille is loyal. Garth being not shiny is equivalent to Jed being not unable and Marcus being light. If someone who is not timid is also loyal, then he is not unable. If there is at least one people who is light or not shiny, then Silas is timid. If Lucille is light, then Brock is not popular. If Curt is not light, then Marcus is popular. Silas is light if and only if Silas is loyal and Brock is not unable. If someone is not timid, then he is loyal. If there is someone who is both unable and not timid, then Jed is shiny. Someone who is both not shiny and unable is always light.
Curt is popular.
neutral
Silas is light. Marcus is not timid. Marcus is popular. Marcus is light. Lucille is not unable. Curt is loyal. Brock is unable. Jed is loyal. Curt is unable. Garth is light. Brock is not shiny. Jed is popular.If there is at least one people who is popular, then Curt is not unable. If there is someone who is loyal, then Brock is timid and Lucille is not popular. If there is someone who is timid, then Marcus is unable and Lucille is loyal. Garth being not shiny is equivalent to Jed being not unable and Marcus being light. If someone who is not timid is also loyal, then he is not unable. If there is at least one people who is light or not shiny, then Silas is timid. If Lucille is light, then Brock is not popular. If Curt is not light, then Marcus is popular. Silas is light if and only if Silas is loyal and Brock is not unable. If someone is not timid, then he is loyal. If there is someone who is both unable and not timid, then Jed is shiny. Someone who is both not shiny and unable is always light.
Brock is unable.
self_contradiction