premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Lauren is not thankful.
Hall is not elderly.
Quinlan is not rich.
Quinlan is not steep.
Randolph is not rich.
Hall is not shallow.
Shawn is not shallow.
Kianna is not elderly.
Randolph is versatile.
Kianna is not shallow.
Quinlan is shallow.
Shawn is thankful.It can be concluded that Lauren is not rich once knowing that Hall is not versatile.
If someone is not versatile, then he is both thankful and not elderly.
If there is at least one people who is elderly, then Lauren is shallow.
If someone is thankful, then he is not elderly, and vice versa.
All not versatile people are steep.
Someone being not thankful is equivalent to being not shallow.
If there is someone who is not shallow, then Quinlan is not elderly.
If there is at least one people who is not elderly, then Randolph is not thankful.
Someone is thankful and not shallow if and only if he is not elderly.
Someone is rich and steep if and only if he is shallow and elderly.
If there is someone who is not shallow, then Hall is versatile and Shawn is not elderly.
If Kianna is shallow, then Quinlan is not versatile and Kianna is thankful, and vice versa. | Lauren is thankful. | contradiction |
Lauren is not thankful.
Hall is not elderly.
Quinlan is not rich.
Quinlan is not steep.
Randolph is not rich.
Hall is not shallow.
Shawn is not shallow.
Kianna is not elderly.
Randolph is versatile.
Kianna is not shallow.
Quinlan is shallow.
Shawn is thankful.It can be concluded that Lauren is not rich once knowing that Hall is not versatile.
If someone is not versatile, then he is both thankful and not elderly.
If there is at least one people who is elderly, then Lauren is shallow.
If someone is thankful, then he is not elderly, and vice versa.
All not versatile people are steep.
Someone being not thankful is equivalent to being not shallow.
If there is someone who is not shallow, then Quinlan is not elderly.
If there is at least one people who is not elderly, then Randolph is not thankful.
Someone is thankful and not shallow if and only if he is not elderly.
Someone is rich and steep if and only if he is shallow and elderly.
If there is someone who is not shallow, then Hall is versatile and Shawn is not elderly.
If Kianna is shallow, then Quinlan is not versatile and Kianna is thankful, and vice versa. | Hall is shallow. | contradiction |
Lauren is not thankful.
Hall is not elderly.
Quinlan is not rich.
Quinlan is not steep.
Randolph is not rich.
Hall is not shallow.
Shawn is not shallow.
Kianna is not elderly.
Randolph is versatile.
Kianna is not shallow.
Quinlan is shallow.
Shawn is thankful.It can be concluded that Lauren is not rich once knowing that Hall is not versatile.
If someone is not versatile, then he is both thankful and not elderly.
If there is at least one people who is elderly, then Lauren is shallow.
If someone is thankful, then he is not elderly, and vice versa.
All not versatile people are steep.
Someone being not thankful is equivalent to being not shallow.
If there is someone who is not shallow, then Quinlan is not elderly.
If there is at least one people who is not elderly, then Randolph is not thankful.
Someone is thankful and not shallow if and only if he is not elderly.
Someone is rich and steep if and only if he is shallow and elderly.
If there is someone who is not shallow, then Hall is versatile and Shawn is not elderly.
If Kianna is shallow, then Quinlan is not versatile and Kianna is thankful, and vice versa. | Randolph is not versatile. | contradiction |
Lauren is not thankful.
Hall is not elderly.
Quinlan is not rich.
Quinlan is not steep.
Randolph is not rich.
Hall is not shallow.
Shawn is not shallow.
Kianna is not elderly.
Randolph is versatile.
Kianna is not shallow.
Quinlan is shallow.
Shawn is thankful.It can be concluded that Lauren is not rich once knowing that Hall is not versatile.
If someone is not versatile, then he is both thankful and not elderly.
If there is at least one people who is elderly, then Lauren is shallow.
If someone is thankful, then he is not elderly, and vice versa.
All not versatile people are steep.
Someone being not thankful is equivalent to being not shallow.
If there is someone who is not shallow, then Quinlan is not elderly.
If there is at least one people who is not elderly, then Randolph is not thankful.
Someone is thankful and not shallow if and only if he is not elderly.
Someone is rich and steep if and only if he is shallow and elderly.
If there is someone who is not shallow, then Hall is versatile and Shawn is not elderly.
If Kianna is shallow, then Quinlan is not versatile and Kianna is thankful, and vice versa. | Shawn is not elderly. | entailment |
Lauren is not thankful.
Hall is not elderly.
Quinlan is not rich.
Quinlan is not steep.
Randolph is not rich.
Hall is not shallow.
Shawn is not shallow.
Kianna is not elderly.
Randolph is versatile.
Kianna is not shallow.
Quinlan is shallow.
Shawn is thankful.It can be concluded that Lauren is not rich once knowing that Hall is not versatile.
If someone is not versatile, then he is both thankful and not elderly.
If there is at least one people who is elderly, then Lauren is shallow.
If someone is thankful, then he is not elderly, and vice versa.
All not versatile people are steep.
Someone being not thankful is equivalent to being not shallow.
If there is someone who is not shallow, then Quinlan is not elderly.
If there is at least one people who is not elderly, then Randolph is not thankful.
Someone is thankful and not shallow if and only if he is not elderly.
Someone is rich and steep if and only if he is shallow and elderly.
If there is someone who is not shallow, then Hall is versatile and Shawn is not elderly.
If Kianna is shallow, then Quinlan is not versatile and Kianna is thankful, and vice versa. | Kianna is thankful. | self_contradiction |
Lauren is not thankful.
Hall is not elderly.
Quinlan is not rich.
Quinlan is not steep.
Randolph is not rich.
Hall is not shallow.
Shawn is not shallow.
Kianna is not elderly.
Randolph is versatile.
Kianna is not shallow.
Quinlan is shallow.
Shawn is thankful.It can be concluded that Lauren is not rich once knowing that Hall is not versatile.
If someone is not versatile, then he is both thankful and not elderly.
If there is at least one people who is elderly, then Lauren is shallow.
If someone is thankful, then he is not elderly, and vice versa.
All not versatile people are steep.
Someone being not thankful is equivalent to being not shallow.
If there is someone who is not shallow, then Quinlan is not elderly.
If there is at least one people who is not elderly, then Randolph is not thankful.
Someone is thankful and not shallow if and only if he is not elderly.
Someone is rich and steep if and only if he is shallow and elderly.
If there is someone who is not shallow, then Hall is versatile and Shawn is not elderly.
If Kianna is shallow, then Quinlan is not versatile and Kianna is thankful, and vice versa. | Randolph is not elderly. | neutral |
Lauren is not thankful.
Hall is not elderly.
Quinlan is not rich.
Quinlan is not steep.
Randolph is not rich.
Hall is not shallow.
Shawn is not shallow.
Kianna is not elderly.
Randolph is versatile.
Kianna is not shallow.
Quinlan is shallow.
Shawn is thankful.It can be concluded that Lauren is not rich once knowing that Hall is not versatile.
If someone is not versatile, then he is both thankful and not elderly.
If there is at least one people who is elderly, then Lauren is shallow.
If someone is thankful, then he is not elderly, and vice versa.
All not versatile people are steep.
Someone being not thankful is equivalent to being not shallow.
If there is someone who is not shallow, then Quinlan is not elderly.
If there is at least one people who is not elderly, then Randolph is not thankful.
Someone is thankful and not shallow if and only if he is not elderly.
Someone is rich and steep if and only if he is shallow and elderly.
If there is someone who is not shallow, then Hall is versatile and Shawn is not elderly.
If Kianna is shallow, then Quinlan is not versatile and Kianna is thankful, and vice versa. | Hall is elderly. | contradiction |
Lauren is not thankful.
Hall is not elderly.
Quinlan is not rich.
Quinlan is not steep.
Randolph is not rich.
Hall is not shallow.
Shawn is not shallow.
Kianna is not elderly.
Randolph is versatile.
Kianna is not shallow.
Quinlan is shallow.
Shawn is thankful.It can be concluded that Lauren is not rich once knowing that Hall is not versatile.
If someone is not versatile, then he is both thankful and not elderly.
If there is at least one people who is elderly, then Lauren is shallow.
If someone is thankful, then he is not elderly, and vice versa.
All not versatile people are steep.
Someone being not thankful is equivalent to being not shallow.
If there is someone who is not shallow, then Quinlan is not elderly.
If there is at least one people who is not elderly, then Randolph is not thankful.
Someone is thankful and not shallow if and only if he is not elderly.
Someone is rich and steep if and only if he is shallow and elderly.
If there is someone who is not shallow, then Hall is versatile and Shawn is not elderly.
If Kianna is shallow, then Quinlan is not versatile and Kianna is thankful, and vice versa. | Quinlan is not rich. | entailment |
Lauren is not thankful.
Hall is not elderly.
Quinlan is not rich.
Quinlan is not steep.
Randolph is not rich.
Hall is not shallow.
Shawn is not shallow.
Kianna is not elderly.
Randolph is versatile.
Kianna is not shallow.
Quinlan is shallow.
Shawn is thankful.It can be concluded that Lauren is not rich once knowing that Hall is not versatile.
If someone is not versatile, then he is both thankful and not elderly.
If there is at least one people who is elderly, then Lauren is shallow.
If someone is thankful, then he is not elderly, and vice versa.
All not versatile people are steep.
Someone being not thankful is equivalent to being not shallow.
If there is someone who is not shallow, then Quinlan is not elderly.
If there is at least one people who is not elderly, then Randolph is not thankful.
Someone is thankful and not shallow if and only if he is not elderly.
Someone is rich and steep if and only if he is shallow and elderly.
If there is someone who is not shallow, then Hall is versatile and Shawn is not elderly.
If Kianna is shallow, then Quinlan is not versatile and Kianna is thankful, and vice versa. | Quinlan is thankful. | self_contradiction |
Lauren is not thankful.
Hall is not elderly.
Quinlan is not rich.
Quinlan is not steep.
Randolph is not rich.
Hall is not shallow.
Shawn is not shallow.
Kianna is not elderly.
Randolph is versatile.
Kianna is not shallow.
Quinlan is shallow.
Shawn is thankful.It can be concluded that Lauren is not rich once knowing that Hall is not versatile.
If someone is not versatile, then he is both thankful and not elderly.
If there is at least one people who is elderly, then Lauren is shallow.
If someone is thankful, then he is not elderly, and vice versa.
All not versatile people are steep.
Someone being not thankful is equivalent to being not shallow.
If there is someone who is not shallow, then Quinlan is not elderly.
If there is at least one people who is not elderly, then Randolph is not thankful.
Someone is thankful and not shallow if and only if he is not elderly.
Someone is rich and steep if and only if he is shallow and elderly.
If there is someone who is not shallow, then Hall is versatile and Shawn is not elderly.
If Kianna is shallow, then Quinlan is not versatile and Kianna is thankful, and vice versa. | Cadman is not steep. | neutral |
Lauren is not thankful.
Hall is not elderly.
Quinlan is not rich.
Quinlan is not steep.
Randolph is not rich.
Hall is not shallow.
Shawn is not shallow.
Kianna is not elderly.
Randolph is versatile.
Kianna is not shallow.
Quinlan is shallow.
Shawn is thankful.It can be concluded that Lauren is not rich once knowing that Hall is not versatile.
If someone is not versatile, then he is both thankful and not elderly.
If there is at least one people who is elderly, then Lauren is shallow.
If someone is thankful, then he is not elderly, and vice versa.
All not versatile people are steep.
Someone being not thankful is equivalent to being not shallow.
If there is someone who is not shallow, then Quinlan is not elderly.
If there is at least one people who is not elderly, then Randolph is not thankful.
Someone is thankful and not shallow if and only if he is not elderly.
Someone is rich and steep if and only if he is shallow and elderly.
If there is someone who is not shallow, then Hall is versatile and Shawn is not elderly.
If Kianna is shallow, then Quinlan is not versatile and Kianna is thankful, and vice versa. | Shawn is not thankful. | self_contradiction |
Lauren is not thankful.
Hall is not elderly.
Quinlan is not rich.
Quinlan is not steep.
Randolph is not rich.
Hall is not shallow.
Shawn is not shallow.
Kianna is not elderly.
Randolph is versatile.
Kianna is not shallow.
Quinlan is shallow.
Shawn is thankful.It can be concluded that Lauren is not rich once knowing that Hall is not versatile.
If someone is not versatile, then he is both thankful and not elderly.
If there is at least one people who is elderly, then Lauren is shallow.
If someone is thankful, then he is not elderly, and vice versa.
All not versatile people are steep.
Someone being not thankful is equivalent to being not shallow.
If there is someone who is not shallow, then Quinlan is not elderly.
If there is at least one people who is not elderly, then Randolph is not thankful.
Someone is thankful and not shallow if and only if he is not elderly.
Someone is rich and steep if and only if he is shallow and elderly.
If there is someone who is not shallow, then Hall is versatile and Shawn is not elderly.
If Kianna is shallow, then Quinlan is not versatile and Kianna is thankful, and vice versa. | Quinlan is not shallow. | self_contradiction |
Lauren is not thankful.
Hall is not elderly.
Quinlan is not rich.
Quinlan is not steep.
Randolph is not rich.
Hall is not shallow.
Shawn is not shallow.
Kianna is not elderly.
Randolph is versatile.
Kianna is not shallow.
Quinlan is shallow.
Shawn is thankful.It can be concluded that Lauren is not rich once knowing that Hall is not versatile.
If someone is not versatile, then he is both thankful and not elderly.
If there is at least one people who is elderly, then Lauren is shallow.
If someone is thankful, then he is not elderly, and vice versa.
All not versatile people are steep.
Someone being not thankful is equivalent to being not shallow.
If there is someone who is not shallow, then Quinlan is not elderly.
If there is at least one people who is not elderly, then Randolph is not thankful.
Someone is thankful and not shallow if and only if he is not elderly.
Someone is rich and steep if and only if he is shallow and elderly.
If there is someone who is not shallow, then Hall is versatile and Shawn is not elderly.
If Kianna is shallow, then Quinlan is not versatile and Kianna is thankful, and vice versa. | Lauren is not shallow. | entailment |
Lauren is not thankful.
Hall is not elderly.
Quinlan is not rich.
Quinlan is not steep.
Randolph is not rich.
Hall is not shallow.
Shawn is not shallow.
Kianna is not elderly.
Randolph is versatile.
Kianna is not shallow.
Quinlan is shallow.
Shawn is thankful.It can be concluded that Lauren is not rich once knowing that Hall is not versatile.
If someone is not versatile, then he is both thankful and not elderly.
If there is at least one people who is elderly, then Lauren is shallow.
If someone is thankful, then he is not elderly, and vice versa.
All not versatile people are steep.
Someone being not thankful is equivalent to being not shallow.
If there is someone who is not shallow, then Quinlan is not elderly.
If there is at least one people who is not elderly, then Randolph is not thankful.
Someone is thankful and not shallow if and only if he is not elderly.
Someone is rich and steep if and only if he is shallow and elderly.
If there is someone who is not shallow, then Hall is versatile and Shawn is not elderly.
If Kianna is shallow, then Quinlan is not versatile and Kianna is thankful, and vice versa. | Kianna is steep. | neutral |
Lauren is not thankful.
Hall is not elderly.
Quinlan is not rich.
Quinlan is not steep.
Randolph is not rich.
Hall is not shallow.
Shawn is not shallow.
Kianna is not elderly.
Randolph is versatile.
Kianna is not shallow.
Quinlan is shallow.
Shawn is thankful.It can be concluded that Lauren is not rich once knowing that Hall is not versatile.
If someone is not versatile, then he is both thankful and not elderly.
If there is at least one people who is elderly, then Lauren is shallow.
If someone is thankful, then he is not elderly, and vice versa.
All not versatile people are steep.
Someone being not thankful is equivalent to being not shallow.
If there is someone who is not shallow, then Quinlan is not elderly.
If there is at least one people who is not elderly, then Randolph is not thankful.
Someone is thankful and not shallow if and only if he is not elderly.
Someone is rich and steep if and only if he is shallow and elderly.
If there is someone who is not shallow, then Hall is versatile and Shawn is not elderly.
If Kianna is shallow, then Quinlan is not versatile and Kianna is thankful, and vice versa. | Shawn is not shallow. | entailment |
Lauren is not thankful.
Hall is not elderly.
Quinlan is not rich.
Quinlan is not steep.
Randolph is not rich.
Hall is not shallow.
Shawn is not shallow.
Kianna is not elderly.
Randolph is versatile.
Kianna is not shallow.
Quinlan is shallow.
Shawn is thankful.It can be concluded that Lauren is not rich once knowing that Hall is not versatile.
If someone is not versatile, then he is both thankful and not elderly.
If there is at least one people who is elderly, then Lauren is shallow.
If someone is thankful, then he is not elderly, and vice versa.
All not versatile people are steep.
Someone being not thankful is equivalent to being not shallow.
If there is someone who is not shallow, then Quinlan is not elderly.
If there is at least one people who is not elderly, then Randolph is not thankful.
Someone is thankful and not shallow if and only if he is not elderly.
Someone is rich and steep if and only if he is shallow and elderly.
If there is someone who is not shallow, then Hall is versatile and Shawn is not elderly.
If Kianna is shallow, then Quinlan is not versatile and Kianna is thankful, and vice versa. | Hall is not rich. | neutral |
Lauren is not thankful.
Hall is not elderly.
Quinlan is not rich.
Quinlan is not steep.
Randolph is not rich.
Hall is not shallow.
Shawn is not shallow.
Kianna is not elderly.
Randolph is versatile.
Kianna is not shallow.
Quinlan is shallow.
Shawn is thankful.It can be concluded that Lauren is not rich once knowing that Hall is not versatile.
If someone is not versatile, then he is both thankful and not elderly.
If there is at least one people who is elderly, then Lauren is shallow.
If someone is thankful, then he is not elderly, and vice versa.
All not versatile people are steep.
Someone being not thankful is equivalent to being not shallow.
If there is someone who is not shallow, then Quinlan is not elderly.
If there is at least one people who is not elderly, then Randolph is not thankful.
Someone is thankful and not shallow if and only if he is not elderly.
Someone is rich and steep if and only if he is shallow and elderly.
If there is someone who is not shallow, then Hall is versatile and Shawn is not elderly.
If Kianna is shallow, then Quinlan is not versatile and Kianna is thankful, and vice versa. | Kianna is not elderly. | entailment |
Lauren is not thankful.
Hall is not elderly.
Quinlan is not rich.
Quinlan is not steep.
Randolph is not rich.
Hall is not shallow.
Shawn is not shallow.
Kianna is not elderly.
Randolph is versatile.
Kianna is not shallow.
Quinlan is shallow.
Shawn is thankful.It can be concluded that Lauren is not rich once knowing that Hall is not versatile.
If someone is not versatile, then he is both thankful and not elderly.
If there is at least one people who is elderly, then Lauren is shallow.
If someone is thankful, then he is not elderly, and vice versa.
All not versatile people are steep.
Someone being not thankful is equivalent to being not shallow.
If there is someone who is not shallow, then Quinlan is not elderly.
If there is at least one people who is not elderly, then Randolph is not thankful.
Someone is thankful and not shallow if and only if he is not elderly.
Someone is rich and steep if and only if he is shallow and elderly.
If there is someone who is not shallow, then Hall is versatile and Shawn is not elderly.
If Kianna is shallow, then Quinlan is not versatile and Kianna is thankful, and vice versa. | Shawn is not versatile. | neutral |
Lauren is not thankful.
Hall is not elderly.
Quinlan is not rich.
Quinlan is not steep.
Randolph is not rich.
Hall is not shallow.
Shawn is not shallow.
Kianna is not elderly.
Randolph is versatile.
Kianna is not shallow.
Quinlan is shallow.
Shawn is thankful.It can be concluded that Lauren is not rich once knowing that Hall is not versatile.
If someone is not versatile, then he is both thankful and not elderly.
If there is at least one people who is elderly, then Lauren is shallow.
If someone is thankful, then he is not elderly, and vice versa.
All not versatile people are steep.
Someone being not thankful is equivalent to being not shallow.
If there is someone who is not shallow, then Quinlan is not elderly.
If there is at least one people who is not elderly, then Randolph is not thankful.
Someone is thankful and not shallow if and only if he is not elderly.
Someone is rich and steep if and only if he is shallow and elderly.
If there is someone who is not shallow, then Hall is versatile and Shawn is not elderly.
If Kianna is shallow, then Quinlan is not versatile and Kianna is thankful, and vice versa. | Kianna is shallow. | contradiction |
Lauren is not thankful.
Hall is not elderly.
Quinlan is not rich.
Quinlan is not steep.
Randolph is not rich.
Hall is not shallow.
Shawn is not shallow.
Kianna is not elderly.
Randolph is versatile.
Kianna is not shallow.
Quinlan is shallow.
Shawn is thankful.It can be concluded that Lauren is not rich once knowing that Hall is not versatile.
If someone is not versatile, then he is both thankful and not elderly.
If there is at least one people who is elderly, then Lauren is shallow.
If someone is thankful, then he is not elderly, and vice versa.
All not versatile people are steep.
Someone being not thankful is equivalent to being not shallow.
If there is someone who is not shallow, then Quinlan is not elderly.
If there is at least one people who is not elderly, then Randolph is not thankful.
Someone is thankful and not shallow if and only if he is not elderly.
Someone is rich and steep if and only if he is shallow and elderly.
If there is someone who is not shallow, then Hall is versatile and Shawn is not elderly.
If Kianna is shallow, then Quinlan is not versatile and Kianna is thankful, and vice versa. | Hall is not thankful. | self_contradiction |
Melody is arrow.
Melody is political.
Percival is not ashamed.
Martin is not ashamed.
Quillan is not hurt.
Carter is not ashamed.
Carter is not talented.
Bert is not arrow.
Quillan is messy.
Joshua is not messy.
Bert is not hurt.
Percival is arrow.If Joshua is not arrow, then Martin is messy and Carter is not ashamed.
Someone who is ashamed is always political.
If there is at least one people who is not talented, then Quillan is not political and Quillan is hurt.
Someone being both not arrow and not talented is equivalent to being not political and not hurt.
If everyone is ashamed, then Martin is messy and Quillan is not arrow.
Someone who is eithor not arrow or not messy is always ashamed.
If there is someone who is either not political or not ashamed, then Bert is messy.
If Carter is not messy and Joshua is hurt, then Quillan is political.
Martin being political is equivalent to Percival being not arrow.
If Percival is talented, then Melody is hurt and Quillan is ashamed, and vice versa.
If everyone is hurt or not talented, then Carter is not messy.
If there is someone who is not political, then Melody is ashamed and Carter is not arrow. | Quillan is not arrow. | entailment |
Melody is arrow.
Melody is political.
Percival is not ashamed.
Martin is not ashamed.
Quillan is not hurt.
Carter is not ashamed.
Carter is not talented.
Bert is not arrow.
Quillan is messy.
Joshua is not messy.
Bert is not hurt.
Percival is arrow.If Joshua is not arrow, then Martin is messy and Carter is not ashamed.
Someone who is ashamed is always political.
If there is at least one people who is not talented, then Quillan is not political and Quillan is hurt.
Someone being both not arrow and not talented is equivalent to being not political and not hurt.
If everyone is ashamed, then Martin is messy and Quillan is not arrow.
Someone who is eithor not arrow or not messy is always ashamed.
If there is someone who is either not political or not ashamed, then Bert is messy.
If Carter is not messy and Joshua is hurt, then Quillan is political.
Martin being political is equivalent to Percival being not arrow.
If Percival is talented, then Melody is hurt and Quillan is ashamed, and vice versa.
If everyone is hurt or not talented, then Carter is not messy.
If there is someone who is not political, then Melody is ashamed and Carter is not arrow. | Carter is not political. | self_contradiction |
Melody is arrow.
Melody is political.
Percival is not ashamed.
Martin is not ashamed.
Quillan is not hurt.
Carter is not ashamed.
Carter is not talented.
Bert is not arrow.
Quillan is messy.
Joshua is not messy.
Bert is not hurt.
Percival is arrow.If Joshua is not arrow, then Martin is messy and Carter is not ashamed.
Someone who is ashamed is always political.
If there is at least one people who is not talented, then Quillan is not political and Quillan is hurt.
Someone being both not arrow and not talented is equivalent to being not political and not hurt.
If everyone is ashamed, then Martin is messy and Quillan is not arrow.
Someone who is eithor not arrow or not messy is always ashamed.
If there is someone who is either not political or not ashamed, then Bert is messy.
If Carter is not messy and Joshua is hurt, then Quillan is political.
Martin being political is equivalent to Percival being not arrow.
If Percival is talented, then Melody is hurt and Quillan is ashamed, and vice versa.
If everyone is hurt or not talented, then Carter is not messy.
If there is someone who is not political, then Melody is ashamed and Carter is not arrow. | Melody is not ashamed. | contradiction |
Melody is arrow.
Melody is political.
Percival is not ashamed.
Martin is not ashamed.
Quillan is not hurt.
Carter is not ashamed.
Carter is not talented.
Bert is not arrow.
Quillan is messy.
Joshua is not messy.
Bert is not hurt.
Percival is arrow.If Joshua is not arrow, then Martin is messy and Carter is not ashamed.
Someone who is ashamed is always political.
If there is at least one people who is not talented, then Quillan is not political and Quillan is hurt.
Someone being both not arrow and not talented is equivalent to being not political and not hurt.
If everyone is ashamed, then Martin is messy and Quillan is not arrow.
Someone who is eithor not arrow or not messy is always ashamed.
If there is someone who is either not political or not ashamed, then Bert is messy.
If Carter is not messy and Joshua is hurt, then Quillan is political.
Martin being political is equivalent to Percival being not arrow.
If Percival is talented, then Melody is hurt and Quillan is ashamed, and vice versa.
If everyone is hurt or not talented, then Carter is not messy.
If there is someone who is not political, then Melody is ashamed and Carter is not arrow. | Carter is hurt. | contradiction |
Melody is arrow.
Melody is political.
Percival is not ashamed.
Martin is not ashamed.
Quillan is not hurt.
Carter is not ashamed.
Carter is not talented.
Bert is not arrow.
Quillan is messy.
Joshua is not messy.
Bert is not hurt.
Percival is arrow.If Joshua is not arrow, then Martin is messy and Carter is not ashamed.
Someone who is ashamed is always political.
If there is at least one people who is not talented, then Quillan is not political and Quillan is hurt.
Someone being both not arrow and not talented is equivalent to being not political and not hurt.
If everyone is ashamed, then Martin is messy and Quillan is not arrow.
Someone who is eithor not arrow or not messy is always ashamed.
If there is someone who is either not political or not ashamed, then Bert is messy.
If Carter is not messy and Joshua is hurt, then Quillan is political.
Martin being political is equivalent to Percival being not arrow.
If Percival is talented, then Melody is hurt and Quillan is ashamed, and vice versa.
If everyone is hurt or not talented, then Carter is not messy.
If there is someone who is not political, then Melody is ashamed and Carter is not arrow. | Carter is talented. | contradiction |
Melody is arrow.
Melody is political.
Percival is not ashamed.
Martin is not ashamed.
Quillan is not hurt.
Carter is not ashamed.
Carter is not talented.
Bert is not arrow.
Quillan is messy.
Joshua is not messy.
Bert is not hurt.
Percival is arrow.If Joshua is not arrow, then Martin is messy and Carter is not ashamed.
Someone who is ashamed is always political.
If there is at least one people who is not talented, then Quillan is not political and Quillan is hurt.
Someone being both not arrow and not talented is equivalent to being not political and not hurt.
If everyone is ashamed, then Martin is messy and Quillan is not arrow.
Someone who is eithor not arrow or not messy is always ashamed.
If there is someone who is either not political or not ashamed, then Bert is messy.
If Carter is not messy and Joshua is hurt, then Quillan is political.
Martin being political is equivalent to Percival being not arrow.
If Percival is talented, then Melody is hurt and Quillan is ashamed, and vice versa.
If everyone is hurt or not talented, then Carter is not messy.
If there is someone who is not political, then Melody is ashamed and Carter is not arrow. | Martin is talented. | neutral |
Melody is arrow.
Melody is political.
Percival is not ashamed.
Martin is not ashamed.
Quillan is not hurt.
Carter is not ashamed.
Carter is not talented.
Bert is not arrow.
Quillan is messy.
Joshua is not messy.
Bert is not hurt.
Percival is arrow.If Joshua is not arrow, then Martin is messy and Carter is not ashamed.
Someone who is ashamed is always political.
If there is at least one people who is not talented, then Quillan is not political and Quillan is hurt.
Someone being both not arrow and not talented is equivalent to being not political and not hurt.
If everyone is ashamed, then Martin is messy and Quillan is not arrow.
Someone who is eithor not arrow or not messy is always ashamed.
If there is someone who is either not political or not ashamed, then Bert is messy.
If Carter is not messy and Joshua is hurt, then Quillan is political.
Martin being political is equivalent to Percival being not arrow.
If Percival is talented, then Melody is hurt and Quillan is ashamed, and vice versa.
If everyone is hurt or not talented, then Carter is not messy.
If there is someone who is not political, then Melody is ashamed and Carter is not arrow. | Quillan is not ashamed. | contradiction |
Melody is arrow.
Melody is political.
Percival is not ashamed.
Martin is not ashamed.
Quillan is not hurt.
Carter is not ashamed.
Carter is not talented.
Bert is not arrow.
Quillan is messy.
Joshua is not messy.
Bert is not hurt.
Percival is arrow.If Joshua is not arrow, then Martin is messy and Carter is not ashamed.
Someone who is ashamed is always political.
If there is at least one people who is not talented, then Quillan is not political and Quillan is hurt.
Someone being both not arrow and not talented is equivalent to being not political and not hurt.
If everyone is ashamed, then Martin is messy and Quillan is not arrow.
Someone who is eithor not arrow or not messy is always ashamed.
If there is someone who is either not political or not ashamed, then Bert is messy.
If Carter is not messy and Joshua is hurt, then Quillan is political.
Martin being political is equivalent to Percival being not arrow.
If Percival is talented, then Melody is hurt and Quillan is ashamed, and vice versa.
If everyone is hurt or not talented, then Carter is not messy.
If there is someone who is not political, then Melody is ashamed and Carter is not arrow. | Percival is not messy. | neutral |
Melody is arrow.
Melody is political.
Percival is not ashamed.
Martin is not ashamed.
Quillan is not hurt.
Carter is not ashamed.
Carter is not talented.
Bert is not arrow.
Quillan is messy.
Joshua is not messy.
Bert is not hurt.
Percival is arrow.If Joshua is not arrow, then Martin is messy and Carter is not ashamed.
Someone who is ashamed is always political.
If there is at least one people who is not talented, then Quillan is not political and Quillan is hurt.
Someone being both not arrow and not talented is equivalent to being not political and not hurt.
If everyone is ashamed, then Martin is messy and Quillan is not arrow.
Someone who is eithor not arrow or not messy is always ashamed.
If there is someone who is either not political or not ashamed, then Bert is messy.
If Carter is not messy and Joshua is hurt, then Quillan is political.
Martin being political is equivalent to Percival being not arrow.
If Percival is talented, then Melody is hurt and Quillan is ashamed, and vice versa.
If everyone is hurt or not talented, then Carter is not messy.
If there is someone who is not political, then Melody is ashamed and Carter is not arrow. | Carter is not arrow. | entailment |
Melody is arrow.
Melody is political.
Percival is not ashamed.
Martin is not ashamed.
Quillan is not hurt.
Carter is not ashamed.
Carter is not talented.
Bert is not arrow.
Quillan is messy.
Joshua is not messy.
Bert is not hurt.
Percival is arrow.If Joshua is not arrow, then Martin is messy and Carter is not ashamed.
Someone who is ashamed is always political.
If there is at least one people who is not talented, then Quillan is not political and Quillan is hurt.
Someone being both not arrow and not talented is equivalent to being not political and not hurt.
If everyone is ashamed, then Martin is messy and Quillan is not arrow.
Someone who is eithor not arrow or not messy is always ashamed.
If there is someone who is either not political or not ashamed, then Bert is messy.
If Carter is not messy and Joshua is hurt, then Quillan is political.
Martin being political is equivalent to Percival being not arrow.
If Percival is talented, then Melody is hurt and Quillan is ashamed, and vice versa.
If everyone is hurt or not talented, then Carter is not messy.
If there is someone who is not political, then Melody is ashamed and Carter is not arrow. | Joshua is not hurt. | neutral |
Melody is arrow.
Melody is political.
Percival is not ashamed.
Martin is not ashamed.
Quillan is not hurt.
Carter is not ashamed.
Carter is not talented.
Bert is not arrow.
Quillan is messy.
Joshua is not messy.
Bert is not hurt.
Percival is arrow.If Joshua is not arrow, then Martin is messy and Carter is not ashamed.
Someone who is ashamed is always political.
If there is at least one people who is not talented, then Quillan is not political and Quillan is hurt.
Someone being both not arrow and not talented is equivalent to being not political and not hurt.
If everyone is ashamed, then Martin is messy and Quillan is not arrow.
Someone who is eithor not arrow or not messy is always ashamed.
If there is someone who is either not political or not ashamed, then Bert is messy.
If Carter is not messy and Joshua is hurt, then Quillan is political.
Martin being political is equivalent to Percival being not arrow.
If Percival is talented, then Melody is hurt and Quillan is ashamed, and vice versa.
If everyone is hurt or not talented, then Carter is not messy.
If there is someone who is not political, then Melody is ashamed and Carter is not arrow. | Percival is arrow. | entailment |
Melody is arrow.
Melody is political.
Percival is not ashamed.
Martin is not ashamed.
Quillan is not hurt.
Carter is not ashamed.
Carter is not talented.
Bert is not arrow.
Quillan is messy.
Joshua is not messy.
Bert is not hurt.
Percival is arrow.If Joshua is not arrow, then Martin is messy and Carter is not ashamed.
Someone who is ashamed is always political.
If there is at least one people who is not talented, then Quillan is not political and Quillan is hurt.
Someone being both not arrow and not talented is equivalent to being not political and not hurt.
If everyone is ashamed, then Martin is messy and Quillan is not arrow.
Someone who is eithor not arrow or not messy is always ashamed.
If there is someone who is either not political or not ashamed, then Bert is messy.
If Carter is not messy and Joshua is hurt, then Quillan is political.
Martin being political is equivalent to Percival being not arrow.
If Percival is talented, then Melody is hurt and Quillan is ashamed, and vice versa.
If everyone is hurt or not talented, then Carter is not messy.
If there is someone who is not political, then Melody is ashamed and Carter is not arrow. | Quillan is political. | self_contradiction |
Melody is arrow.
Melody is political.
Percival is not ashamed.
Martin is not ashamed.
Quillan is not hurt.
Carter is not ashamed.
Carter is not talented.
Bert is not arrow.
Quillan is messy.
Joshua is not messy.
Bert is not hurt.
Percival is arrow.If Joshua is not arrow, then Martin is messy and Carter is not ashamed.
Someone who is ashamed is always political.
If there is at least one people who is not talented, then Quillan is not political and Quillan is hurt.
Someone being both not arrow and not talented is equivalent to being not political and not hurt.
If everyone is ashamed, then Martin is messy and Quillan is not arrow.
Someone who is eithor not arrow or not messy is always ashamed.
If there is someone who is either not political or not ashamed, then Bert is messy.
If Carter is not messy and Joshua is hurt, then Quillan is political.
Martin being political is equivalent to Percival being not arrow.
If Percival is talented, then Melody is hurt and Quillan is ashamed, and vice versa.
If everyone is hurt or not talented, then Carter is not messy.
If there is someone who is not political, then Melody is ashamed and Carter is not arrow. | Bert is not arrow. | entailment |
Melody is arrow.
Melody is political.
Percival is not ashamed.
Martin is not ashamed.
Quillan is not hurt.
Carter is not ashamed.
Carter is not talented.
Bert is not arrow.
Quillan is messy.
Joshua is not messy.
Bert is not hurt.
Percival is arrow.If Joshua is not arrow, then Martin is messy and Carter is not ashamed.
Someone who is ashamed is always political.
If there is at least one people who is not talented, then Quillan is not political and Quillan is hurt.
Someone being both not arrow and not talented is equivalent to being not political and not hurt.
If everyone is ashamed, then Martin is messy and Quillan is not arrow.
Someone who is eithor not arrow or not messy is always ashamed.
If there is someone who is either not political or not ashamed, then Bert is messy.
If Carter is not messy and Joshua is hurt, then Quillan is political.
Martin being political is equivalent to Percival being not arrow.
If Percival is talented, then Melody is hurt and Quillan is ashamed, and vice versa.
If everyone is hurt or not talented, then Carter is not messy.
If there is someone who is not political, then Melody is ashamed and Carter is not arrow. | Quillan is talented. | contradiction |
Melody is arrow.
Melody is political.
Percival is not ashamed.
Martin is not ashamed.
Quillan is not hurt.
Carter is not ashamed.
Carter is not talented.
Bert is not arrow.
Quillan is messy.
Joshua is not messy.
Bert is not hurt.
Percival is arrow.If Joshua is not arrow, then Martin is messy and Carter is not ashamed.
Someone who is ashamed is always political.
If there is at least one people who is not talented, then Quillan is not political and Quillan is hurt.
Someone being both not arrow and not talented is equivalent to being not political and not hurt.
If everyone is ashamed, then Martin is messy and Quillan is not arrow.
Someone who is eithor not arrow or not messy is always ashamed.
If there is someone who is either not political or not ashamed, then Bert is messy.
If Carter is not messy and Joshua is hurt, then Quillan is political.
Martin being political is equivalent to Percival being not arrow.
If Percival is talented, then Melody is hurt and Quillan is ashamed, and vice versa.
If everyone is hurt or not talented, then Carter is not messy.
If there is someone who is not political, then Melody is ashamed and Carter is not arrow. | Melody is political. | entailment |
Melody is arrow.
Melody is political.
Percival is not ashamed.
Martin is not ashamed.
Quillan is not hurt.
Carter is not ashamed.
Carter is not talented.
Bert is not arrow.
Quillan is messy.
Joshua is not messy.
Bert is not hurt.
Percival is arrow.If Joshua is not arrow, then Martin is messy and Carter is not ashamed.
Someone who is ashamed is always political.
If there is at least one people who is not talented, then Quillan is not political and Quillan is hurt.
Someone being both not arrow and not talented is equivalent to being not political and not hurt.
If everyone is ashamed, then Martin is messy and Quillan is not arrow.
Someone who is eithor not arrow or not messy is always ashamed.
If there is someone who is either not political or not ashamed, then Bert is messy.
If Carter is not messy and Joshua is hurt, then Quillan is political.
Martin being political is equivalent to Percival being not arrow.
If Percival is talented, then Melody is hurt and Quillan is ashamed, and vice versa.
If everyone is hurt or not talented, then Carter is not messy.
If there is someone who is not political, then Melody is ashamed and Carter is not arrow. | Carter is political. | self_contradiction |
Melody is arrow.
Melody is political.
Percival is not ashamed.
Martin is not ashamed.
Quillan is not hurt.
Carter is not ashamed.
Carter is not talented.
Bert is not arrow.
Quillan is messy.
Joshua is not messy.
Bert is not hurt.
Percival is arrow.If Joshua is not arrow, then Martin is messy and Carter is not ashamed.
Someone who is ashamed is always political.
If there is at least one people who is not talented, then Quillan is not political and Quillan is hurt.
Someone being both not arrow and not talented is equivalent to being not political and not hurt.
If everyone is ashamed, then Martin is messy and Quillan is not arrow.
Someone who is eithor not arrow or not messy is always ashamed.
If there is someone who is either not political or not ashamed, then Bert is messy.
If Carter is not messy and Joshua is hurt, then Quillan is political.
Martin being political is equivalent to Percival being not arrow.
If Percival is talented, then Melody is hurt and Quillan is ashamed, and vice versa.
If everyone is hurt or not talented, then Carter is not messy.
If there is someone who is not political, then Melody is ashamed and Carter is not arrow. | Quillan is hurt. | self_contradiction |
Melody is arrow.
Melody is political.
Percival is not ashamed.
Martin is not ashamed.
Quillan is not hurt.
Carter is not ashamed.
Carter is not talented.
Bert is not arrow.
Quillan is messy.
Joshua is not messy.
Bert is not hurt.
Percival is arrow.If Joshua is not arrow, then Martin is messy and Carter is not ashamed.
Someone who is ashamed is always political.
If there is at least one people who is not talented, then Quillan is not political and Quillan is hurt.
Someone being both not arrow and not talented is equivalent to being not political and not hurt.
If everyone is ashamed, then Martin is messy and Quillan is not arrow.
Someone who is eithor not arrow or not messy is always ashamed.
If there is someone who is either not political or not ashamed, then Bert is messy.
If Carter is not messy and Joshua is hurt, then Quillan is political.
Martin being political is equivalent to Percival being not arrow.
If Percival is talented, then Melody is hurt and Quillan is ashamed, and vice versa.
If everyone is hurt or not talented, then Carter is not messy.
If there is someone who is not political, then Melody is ashamed and Carter is not arrow. | Quillan is not hurt. | self_contradiction |
Melody is arrow.
Melody is political.
Percival is not ashamed.
Martin is not ashamed.
Quillan is not hurt.
Carter is not ashamed.
Carter is not talented.
Bert is not arrow.
Quillan is messy.
Joshua is not messy.
Bert is not hurt.
Percival is arrow.If Joshua is not arrow, then Martin is messy and Carter is not ashamed.
Someone who is ashamed is always political.
If there is at least one people who is not talented, then Quillan is not political and Quillan is hurt.
Someone being both not arrow and not talented is equivalent to being not political and not hurt.
If everyone is ashamed, then Martin is messy and Quillan is not arrow.
Someone who is eithor not arrow or not messy is always ashamed.
If there is someone who is either not political or not ashamed, then Bert is messy.
If Carter is not messy and Joshua is hurt, then Quillan is political.
Martin being political is equivalent to Percival being not arrow.
If Percival is talented, then Melody is hurt and Quillan is ashamed, and vice versa.
If everyone is hurt or not talented, then Carter is not messy.
If there is someone who is not political, then Melody is ashamed and Carter is not arrow. | Percival is hurt. | neutral |
Melody is arrow.
Melody is political.
Percival is not ashamed.
Martin is not ashamed.
Quillan is not hurt.
Carter is not ashamed.
Carter is not talented.
Bert is not arrow.
Quillan is messy.
Joshua is not messy.
Bert is not hurt.
Percival is arrow.If Joshua is not arrow, then Martin is messy and Carter is not ashamed.
Someone who is ashamed is always political.
If there is at least one people who is not talented, then Quillan is not political and Quillan is hurt.
Someone being both not arrow and not talented is equivalent to being not political and not hurt.
If everyone is ashamed, then Martin is messy and Quillan is not arrow.
Someone who is eithor not arrow or not messy is always ashamed.
If there is someone who is either not political or not ashamed, then Bert is messy.
If Carter is not messy and Joshua is hurt, then Quillan is political.
Martin being political is equivalent to Percival being not arrow.
If Percival is talented, then Melody is hurt and Quillan is ashamed, and vice versa.
If everyone is hurt or not talented, then Carter is not messy.
If there is someone who is not political, then Melody is ashamed and Carter is not arrow. | Martin is not hurt. | neutral |
Sean is not eastern.
Justin is not attractive.
Jeremiah is not frail.
Jeremiah is miniscule.
Sean is attractive.
Jeremiah is eastern.
Carlton is emotional.
Morris is not arrow.
Justin is eastern.
Jeremiah is not emotional.
Kirby is miniscule.
Justin is emotional.Ashley is not frail if and only if Carlton is not emotional.
Someone being both attractive and not eastern is equivalent to being arrow.
If someone is not frail or he is arrow, then he is not attractive.
If there is at least one people who is not attractive, then Morris is not frail and Morris is arrow.
If there is someone who is either not attractive or not eastern, then Jeremiah is arrow.
If all people are not eastern, then Jeremiah is not miniscule and Sean is not frail.
Someone being not frail is equivalent to being not eastern.
If someone who is frail is also arrow, then he is emotional.
It can be concluded that Kirby is eastern once knowing that Morris is attractive.
If someone is not attractive and not eastern, then he is both emotional and arrow, and vice versa.
Sean is miniscule if and only if Justin is attractive.
Someone who is eithor not frail or not eastern is always attractive. | Carlton is not emotional. | contradiction |
Sean is not eastern.
Justin is not attractive.
Jeremiah is not frail.
Jeremiah is miniscule.
Sean is attractive.
Jeremiah is eastern.
Carlton is emotional.
Morris is not arrow.
Justin is eastern.
Jeremiah is not emotional.
Kirby is miniscule.
Justin is emotional.Ashley is not frail if and only if Carlton is not emotional.
Someone being both attractive and not eastern is equivalent to being arrow.
If someone is not frail or he is arrow, then he is not attractive.
If there is at least one people who is not attractive, then Morris is not frail and Morris is arrow.
If there is someone who is either not attractive or not eastern, then Jeremiah is arrow.
If all people are not eastern, then Jeremiah is not miniscule and Sean is not frail.
Someone being not frail is equivalent to being not eastern.
If someone who is frail is also arrow, then he is emotional.
It can be concluded that Kirby is eastern once knowing that Morris is attractive.
If someone is not attractive and not eastern, then he is both emotional and arrow, and vice versa.
Sean is miniscule if and only if Justin is attractive.
Someone who is eithor not frail or not eastern is always attractive. | Morris is not emotional. | contradiction |
Sean is not eastern.
Justin is not attractive.
Jeremiah is not frail.
Jeremiah is miniscule.
Sean is attractive.
Jeremiah is eastern.
Carlton is emotional.
Morris is not arrow.
Justin is eastern.
Jeremiah is not emotional.
Kirby is miniscule.
Justin is emotional.Ashley is not frail if and only if Carlton is not emotional.
Someone being both attractive and not eastern is equivalent to being arrow.
If someone is not frail or he is arrow, then he is not attractive.
If there is at least one people who is not attractive, then Morris is not frail and Morris is arrow.
If there is someone who is either not attractive or not eastern, then Jeremiah is arrow.
If all people are not eastern, then Jeremiah is not miniscule and Sean is not frail.
Someone being not frail is equivalent to being not eastern.
If someone who is frail is also arrow, then he is emotional.
It can be concluded that Kirby is eastern once knowing that Morris is attractive.
If someone is not attractive and not eastern, then he is both emotional and arrow, and vice versa.
Sean is miniscule if and only if Justin is attractive.
Someone who is eithor not frail or not eastern is always attractive. | Justin is emotional. | entailment |
Sean is not eastern.
Justin is not attractive.
Jeremiah is not frail.
Jeremiah is miniscule.
Sean is attractive.
Jeremiah is eastern.
Carlton is emotional.
Morris is not arrow.
Justin is eastern.
Jeremiah is not emotional.
Kirby is miniscule.
Justin is emotional.Ashley is not frail if and only if Carlton is not emotional.
Someone being both attractive and not eastern is equivalent to being arrow.
If someone is not frail or he is arrow, then he is not attractive.
If there is at least one people who is not attractive, then Morris is not frail and Morris is arrow.
If there is someone who is either not attractive or not eastern, then Jeremiah is arrow.
If all people are not eastern, then Jeremiah is not miniscule and Sean is not frail.
Someone being not frail is equivalent to being not eastern.
If someone who is frail is also arrow, then he is emotional.
It can be concluded that Kirby is eastern once knowing that Morris is attractive.
If someone is not attractive and not eastern, then he is both emotional and arrow, and vice versa.
Sean is miniscule if and only if Justin is attractive.
Someone who is eithor not frail or not eastern is always attractive. | Morris is not arrow. | self_contradiction |
Sean is not eastern.
Justin is not attractive.
Jeremiah is not frail.
Jeremiah is miniscule.
Sean is attractive.
Jeremiah is eastern.
Carlton is emotional.
Morris is not arrow.
Justin is eastern.
Jeremiah is not emotional.
Kirby is miniscule.
Justin is emotional.Ashley is not frail if and only if Carlton is not emotional.
Someone being both attractive and not eastern is equivalent to being arrow.
If someone is not frail or he is arrow, then he is not attractive.
If there is at least one people who is not attractive, then Morris is not frail and Morris is arrow.
If there is someone who is either not attractive or not eastern, then Jeremiah is arrow.
If all people are not eastern, then Jeremiah is not miniscule and Sean is not frail.
Someone being not frail is equivalent to being not eastern.
If someone who is frail is also arrow, then he is emotional.
It can be concluded that Kirby is eastern once knowing that Morris is attractive.
If someone is not attractive and not eastern, then he is both emotional and arrow, and vice versa.
Sean is miniscule if and only if Justin is attractive.
Someone who is eithor not frail or not eastern is always attractive. | Sean is not attractive. | self_contradiction |
Sean is not eastern.
Justin is not attractive.
Jeremiah is not frail.
Jeremiah is miniscule.
Sean is attractive.
Jeremiah is eastern.
Carlton is emotional.
Morris is not arrow.
Justin is eastern.
Jeremiah is not emotional.
Kirby is miniscule.
Justin is emotional.Ashley is not frail if and only if Carlton is not emotional.
Someone being both attractive and not eastern is equivalent to being arrow.
If someone is not frail or he is arrow, then he is not attractive.
If there is at least one people who is not attractive, then Morris is not frail and Morris is arrow.
If there is someone who is either not attractive or not eastern, then Jeremiah is arrow.
If all people are not eastern, then Jeremiah is not miniscule and Sean is not frail.
Someone being not frail is equivalent to being not eastern.
If someone who is frail is also arrow, then he is emotional.
It can be concluded that Kirby is eastern once knowing that Morris is attractive.
If someone is not attractive and not eastern, then he is both emotional and arrow, and vice versa.
Sean is miniscule if and only if Justin is attractive.
Someone who is eithor not frail or not eastern is always attractive. | Kirby is not frail. | neutral |
Sean is not eastern.
Justin is not attractive.
Jeremiah is not frail.
Jeremiah is miniscule.
Sean is attractive.
Jeremiah is eastern.
Carlton is emotional.
Morris is not arrow.
Justin is eastern.
Jeremiah is not emotional.
Kirby is miniscule.
Justin is emotional.Ashley is not frail if and only if Carlton is not emotional.
Someone being both attractive and not eastern is equivalent to being arrow.
If someone is not frail or he is arrow, then he is not attractive.
If there is at least one people who is not attractive, then Morris is not frail and Morris is arrow.
If there is someone who is either not attractive or not eastern, then Jeremiah is arrow.
If all people are not eastern, then Jeremiah is not miniscule and Sean is not frail.
Someone being not frail is equivalent to being not eastern.
If someone who is frail is also arrow, then he is emotional.
It can be concluded that Kirby is eastern once knowing that Morris is attractive.
If someone is not attractive and not eastern, then he is both emotional and arrow, and vice versa.
Sean is miniscule if and only if Justin is attractive.
Someone who is eithor not frail or not eastern is always attractive. | Justin is eastern. | entailment |
Sean is not eastern.
Justin is not attractive.
Jeremiah is not frail.
Jeremiah is miniscule.
Sean is attractive.
Jeremiah is eastern.
Carlton is emotional.
Morris is not arrow.
Justin is eastern.
Jeremiah is not emotional.
Kirby is miniscule.
Justin is emotional.Ashley is not frail if and only if Carlton is not emotional.
Someone being both attractive and not eastern is equivalent to being arrow.
If someone is not frail or he is arrow, then he is not attractive.
If there is at least one people who is not attractive, then Morris is not frail and Morris is arrow.
If there is someone who is either not attractive or not eastern, then Jeremiah is arrow.
If all people are not eastern, then Jeremiah is not miniscule and Sean is not frail.
Someone being not frail is equivalent to being not eastern.
If someone who is frail is also arrow, then he is emotional.
It can be concluded that Kirby is eastern once knowing that Morris is attractive.
If someone is not attractive and not eastern, then he is both emotional and arrow, and vice versa.
Sean is miniscule if and only if Justin is attractive.
Someone who is eithor not frail or not eastern is always attractive. | Sean is not eastern. | entailment |
Sean is not eastern.
Justin is not attractive.
Jeremiah is not frail.
Jeremiah is miniscule.
Sean is attractive.
Jeremiah is eastern.
Carlton is emotional.
Morris is not arrow.
Justin is eastern.
Jeremiah is not emotional.
Kirby is miniscule.
Justin is emotional.Ashley is not frail if and only if Carlton is not emotional.
Someone being both attractive and not eastern is equivalent to being arrow.
If someone is not frail or he is arrow, then he is not attractive.
If there is at least one people who is not attractive, then Morris is not frail and Morris is arrow.
If there is someone who is either not attractive or not eastern, then Jeremiah is arrow.
If all people are not eastern, then Jeremiah is not miniscule and Sean is not frail.
Someone being not frail is equivalent to being not eastern.
If someone who is frail is also arrow, then he is emotional.
It can be concluded that Kirby is eastern once knowing that Morris is attractive.
If someone is not attractive and not eastern, then he is both emotional and arrow, and vice versa.
Sean is miniscule if and only if Justin is attractive.
Someone who is eithor not frail or not eastern is always attractive. | Jeremiah is eastern. | self_contradiction |
Sean is not eastern.
Justin is not attractive.
Jeremiah is not frail.
Jeremiah is miniscule.
Sean is attractive.
Jeremiah is eastern.
Carlton is emotional.
Morris is not arrow.
Justin is eastern.
Jeremiah is not emotional.
Kirby is miniscule.
Justin is emotional.Ashley is not frail if and only if Carlton is not emotional.
Someone being both attractive and not eastern is equivalent to being arrow.
If someone is not frail or he is arrow, then he is not attractive.
If there is at least one people who is not attractive, then Morris is not frail and Morris is arrow.
If there is someone who is either not attractive or not eastern, then Jeremiah is arrow.
If all people are not eastern, then Jeremiah is not miniscule and Sean is not frail.
Someone being not frail is equivalent to being not eastern.
If someone who is frail is also arrow, then he is emotional.
It can be concluded that Kirby is eastern once knowing that Morris is attractive.
If someone is not attractive and not eastern, then he is both emotional and arrow, and vice versa.
Sean is miniscule if and only if Justin is attractive.
Someone who is eithor not frail or not eastern is always attractive. | Sean is emotional. | entailment |
Sean is not eastern.
Justin is not attractive.
Jeremiah is not frail.
Jeremiah is miniscule.
Sean is attractive.
Jeremiah is eastern.
Carlton is emotional.
Morris is not arrow.
Justin is eastern.
Jeremiah is not emotional.
Kirby is miniscule.
Justin is emotional.Ashley is not frail if and only if Carlton is not emotional.
Someone being both attractive and not eastern is equivalent to being arrow.
If someone is not frail or he is arrow, then he is not attractive.
If there is at least one people who is not attractive, then Morris is not frail and Morris is arrow.
If there is someone who is either not attractive or not eastern, then Jeremiah is arrow.
If all people are not eastern, then Jeremiah is not miniscule and Sean is not frail.
Someone being not frail is equivalent to being not eastern.
If someone who is frail is also arrow, then he is emotional.
It can be concluded that Kirby is eastern once knowing that Morris is attractive.
If someone is not attractive and not eastern, then he is both emotional and arrow, and vice versa.
Sean is miniscule if and only if Justin is attractive.
Someone who is eithor not frail or not eastern is always attractive. | Justin is attractive. | contradiction |
Sean is not eastern.
Justin is not attractive.
Jeremiah is not frail.
Jeremiah is miniscule.
Sean is attractive.
Jeremiah is eastern.
Carlton is emotional.
Morris is not arrow.
Justin is eastern.
Jeremiah is not emotional.
Kirby is miniscule.
Justin is emotional.Ashley is not frail if and only if Carlton is not emotional.
Someone being both attractive and not eastern is equivalent to being arrow.
If someone is not frail or he is arrow, then he is not attractive.
If there is at least one people who is not attractive, then Morris is not frail and Morris is arrow.
If there is someone who is either not attractive or not eastern, then Jeremiah is arrow.
If all people are not eastern, then Jeremiah is not miniscule and Sean is not frail.
Someone being not frail is equivalent to being not eastern.
If someone who is frail is also arrow, then he is emotional.
It can be concluded that Kirby is eastern once knowing that Morris is attractive.
If someone is not attractive and not eastern, then he is both emotional and arrow, and vice versa.
Sean is miniscule if and only if Justin is attractive.
Someone who is eithor not frail or not eastern is always attractive. | Carlton is frail. | neutral |
Sean is not eastern.
Justin is not attractive.
Jeremiah is not frail.
Jeremiah is miniscule.
Sean is attractive.
Jeremiah is eastern.
Carlton is emotional.
Morris is not arrow.
Justin is eastern.
Jeremiah is not emotional.
Kirby is miniscule.
Justin is emotional.Ashley is not frail if and only if Carlton is not emotional.
Someone being both attractive and not eastern is equivalent to being arrow.
If someone is not frail or he is arrow, then he is not attractive.
If there is at least one people who is not attractive, then Morris is not frail and Morris is arrow.
If there is someone who is either not attractive or not eastern, then Jeremiah is arrow.
If all people are not eastern, then Jeremiah is not miniscule and Sean is not frail.
Someone being not frail is equivalent to being not eastern.
If someone who is frail is also arrow, then he is emotional.
It can be concluded that Kirby is eastern once knowing that Morris is attractive.
If someone is not attractive and not eastern, then he is both emotional and arrow, and vice versa.
Sean is miniscule if and only if Justin is attractive.
Someone who is eithor not frail or not eastern is always attractive. | Justin is not emotional. | contradiction |
Sean is not eastern.
Justin is not attractive.
Jeremiah is not frail.
Jeremiah is miniscule.
Sean is attractive.
Jeremiah is eastern.
Carlton is emotional.
Morris is not arrow.
Justin is eastern.
Jeremiah is not emotional.
Kirby is miniscule.
Justin is emotional.Ashley is not frail if and only if Carlton is not emotional.
Someone being both attractive and not eastern is equivalent to being arrow.
If someone is not frail or he is arrow, then he is not attractive.
If there is at least one people who is not attractive, then Morris is not frail and Morris is arrow.
If there is someone who is either not attractive or not eastern, then Jeremiah is arrow.
If all people are not eastern, then Jeremiah is not miniscule and Sean is not frail.
Someone being not frail is equivalent to being not eastern.
If someone who is frail is also arrow, then he is emotional.
It can be concluded that Kirby is eastern once knowing that Morris is attractive.
If someone is not attractive and not eastern, then he is both emotional and arrow, and vice versa.
Sean is miniscule if and only if Justin is attractive.
Someone who is eithor not frail or not eastern is always attractive. | Sean is attractive. | self_contradiction |
Sean is not eastern.
Justin is not attractive.
Jeremiah is not frail.
Jeremiah is miniscule.
Sean is attractive.
Jeremiah is eastern.
Carlton is emotional.
Morris is not arrow.
Justin is eastern.
Jeremiah is not emotional.
Kirby is miniscule.
Justin is emotional.Ashley is not frail if and only if Carlton is not emotional.
Someone being both attractive and not eastern is equivalent to being arrow.
If someone is not frail or he is arrow, then he is not attractive.
If there is at least one people who is not attractive, then Morris is not frail and Morris is arrow.
If there is someone who is either not attractive or not eastern, then Jeremiah is arrow.
If all people are not eastern, then Jeremiah is not miniscule and Sean is not frail.
Someone being not frail is equivalent to being not eastern.
If someone who is frail is also arrow, then he is emotional.
It can be concluded that Kirby is eastern once knowing that Morris is attractive.
If someone is not attractive and not eastern, then he is both emotional and arrow, and vice versa.
Sean is miniscule if and only if Justin is attractive.
Someone who is eithor not frail or not eastern is always attractive. | Morris is frail. | contradiction |
Sean is not eastern.
Justin is not attractive.
Jeremiah is not frail.
Jeremiah is miniscule.
Sean is attractive.
Jeremiah is eastern.
Carlton is emotional.
Morris is not arrow.
Justin is eastern.
Jeremiah is not emotional.
Kirby is miniscule.
Justin is emotional.Ashley is not frail if and only if Carlton is not emotional.
Someone being both attractive and not eastern is equivalent to being arrow.
If someone is not frail or he is arrow, then he is not attractive.
If there is at least one people who is not attractive, then Morris is not frail and Morris is arrow.
If there is someone who is either not attractive or not eastern, then Jeremiah is arrow.
If all people are not eastern, then Jeremiah is not miniscule and Sean is not frail.
Someone being not frail is equivalent to being not eastern.
If someone who is frail is also arrow, then he is emotional.
It can be concluded that Kirby is eastern once knowing that Morris is attractive.
If someone is not attractive and not eastern, then he is both emotional and arrow, and vice versa.
Sean is miniscule if and only if Justin is attractive.
Someone who is eithor not frail or not eastern is always attractive. | Morris is attractive. | self_contradiction |
Sean is not eastern.
Justin is not attractive.
Jeremiah is not frail.
Jeremiah is miniscule.
Sean is attractive.
Jeremiah is eastern.
Carlton is emotional.
Morris is not arrow.
Justin is eastern.
Jeremiah is not emotional.
Kirby is miniscule.
Justin is emotional.Ashley is not frail if and only if Carlton is not emotional.
Someone being both attractive and not eastern is equivalent to being arrow.
If someone is not frail or he is arrow, then he is not attractive.
If there is at least one people who is not attractive, then Morris is not frail and Morris is arrow.
If there is someone who is either not attractive or not eastern, then Jeremiah is arrow.
If all people are not eastern, then Jeremiah is not miniscule and Sean is not frail.
Someone being not frail is equivalent to being not eastern.
If someone who is frail is also arrow, then he is emotional.
It can be concluded that Kirby is eastern once knowing that Morris is attractive.
If someone is not attractive and not eastern, then he is both emotional and arrow, and vice versa.
Sean is miniscule if and only if Justin is attractive.
Someone who is eithor not frail or not eastern is always attractive. | Justin is not miniscule. | neutral |
Sean is not eastern.
Justin is not attractive.
Jeremiah is not frail.
Jeremiah is miniscule.
Sean is attractive.
Jeremiah is eastern.
Carlton is emotional.
Morris is not arrow.
Justin is eastern.
Jeremiah is not emotional.
Kirby is miniscule.
Justin is emotional.Ashley is not frail if and only if Carlton is not emotional.
Someone being both attractive and not eastern is equivalent to being arrow.
If someone is not frail or he is arrow, then he is not attractive.
If there is at least one people who is not attractive, then Morris is not frail and Morris is arrow.
If there is someone who is either not attractive or not eastern, then Jeremiah is arrow.
If all people are not eastern, then Jeremiah is not miniscule and Sean is not frail.
Someone being not frail is equivalent to being not eastern.
If someone who is frail is also arrow, then he is emotional.
It can be concluded that Kirby is eastern once knowing that Morris is attractive.
If someone is not attractive and not eastern, then he is both emotional and arrow, and vice versa.
Sean is miniscule if and only if Justin is attractive.
Someone who is eithor not frail or not eastern is always attractive. | Ashley is not miniscule. | neutral |
Sean is not eastern.
Justin is not attractive.
Jeremiah is not frail.
Jeremiah is miniscule.
Sean is attractive.
Jeremiah is eastern.
Carlton is emotional.
Morris is not arrow.
Justin is eastern.
Jeremiah is not emotional.
Kirby is miniscule.
Justin is emotional.Ashley is not frail if and only if Carlton is not emotional.
Someone being both attractive and not eastern is equivalent to being arrow.
If someone is not frail or he is arrow, then he is not attractive.
If there is at least one people who is not attractive, then Morris is not frail and Morris is arrow.
If there is someone who is either not attractive or not eastern, then Jeremiah is arrow.
If all people are not eastern, then Jeremiah is not miniscule and Sean is not frail.
Someone being not frail is equivalent to being not eastern.
If someone who is frail is also arrow, then he is emotional.
It can be concluded that Kirby is eastern once knowing that Morris is attractive.
If someone is not attractive and not eastern, then he is both emotional and arrow, and vice versa.
Sean is miniscule if and only if Justin is attractive.
Someone who is eithor not frail or not eastern is always attractive. | Kirby is miniscule. | entailment |
Sean is not eastern.
Justin is not attractive.
Jeremiah is not frail.
Jeremiah is miniscule.
Sean is attractive.
Jeremiah is eastern.
Carlton is emotional.
Morris is not arrow.
Justin is eastern.
Jeremiah is not emotional.
Kirby is miniscule.
Justin is emotional.Ashley is not frail if and only if Carlton is not emotional.
Someone being both attractive and not eastern is equivalent to being arrow.
If someone is not frail or he is arrow, then he is not attractive.
If there is at least one people who is not attractive, then Morris is not frail and Morris is arrow.
If there is someone who is either not attractive or not eastern, then Jeremiah is arrow.
If all people are not eastern, then Jeremiah is not miniscule and Sean is not frail.
Someone being not frail is equivalent to being not eastern.
If someone who is frail is also arrow, then he is emotional.
It can be concluded that Kirby is eastern once knowing that Morris is attractive.
If someone is not attractive and not eastern, then he is both emotional and arrow, and vice versa.
Sean is miniscule if and only if Justin is attractive.
Someone who is eithor not frail or not eastern is always attractive. | Ashley is eastern. | neutral |
Kelsey is not elated.
Stefan is elated.
Stefan is misty.
Danna is not elated.
Kelsey is latter.
Kelsey is misty.
Kelsey is not intelligent.
Uriah is intelligent.
Otis is not misty.
Gardner is placid.
Gardner is misty.
Kelsey is not placid.It can be concluded that Justin is latter once knowing that Kelsey is elated and Gardner is intelligent.
Someone who is elated is always placid.
If there is at least one people who is latter or misty, then Justin is not frantic.
Someone who is not placid is always not intelligent.
Someone is not elated and intelligent if and only if he is frantic.
Someone who is both placid and not latter is always misty.
If there is at least one people who is either elated or not placid, then Justin is misty and Gardner is not frantic.
Someone is not intelligent if and only if he is not misty.
Someone who is both elated and not misty is always intelligent.
Someone is misty and frantic if and only if he is not placid.
If someone is not placid or not frantic, then he is not misty.
If everyone is not misty, then Justin is latter. | Kelsey is not frantic. | contradiction |
Kelsey is not elated.
Stefan is elated.
Stefan is misty.
Danna is not elated.
Kelsey is latter.
Kelsey is misty.
Kelsey is not intelligent.
Uriah is intelligent.
Otis is not misty.
Gardner is placid.
Gardner is misty.
Kelsey is not placid.It can be concluded that Justin is latter once knowing that Kelsey is elated and Gardner is intelligent.
Someone who is elated is always placid.
If there is at least one people who is latter or misty, then Justin is not frantic.
Someone who is not placid is always not intelligent.
Someone is not elated and intelligent if and only if he is frantic.
Someone who is both placid and not latter is always misty.
If there is at least one people who is either elated or not placid, then Justin is misty and Gardner is not frantic.
Someone is not intelligent if and only if he is not misty.
Someone who is both elated and not misty is always intelligent.
Someone is misty and frantic if and only if he is not placid.
If someone is not placid or not frantic, then he is not misty.
If everyone is not misty, then Justin is latter. | Justin is frantic. | contradiction |
Kelsey is not elated.
Stefan is elated.
Stefan is misty.
Danna is not elated.
Kelsey is latter.
Kelsey is misty.
Kelsey is not intelligent.
Uriah is intelligent.
Otis is not misty.
Gardner is placid.
Gardner is misty.
Kelsey is not placid.It can be concluded that Justin is latter once knowing that Kelsey is elated and Gardner is intelligent.
Someone who is elated is always placid.
If there is at least one people who is latter or misty, then Justin is not frantic.
Someone who is not placid is always not intelligent.
Someone is not elated and intelligent if and only if he is frantic.
Someone who is both placid and not latter is always misty.
If there is at least one people who is either elated or not placid, then Justin is misty and Gardner is not frantic.
Someone is not intelligent if and only if he is not misty.
Someone who is both elated and not misty is always intelligent.
Someone is misty and frantic if and only if he is not placid.
If someone is not placid or not frantic, then he is not misty.
If everyone is not misty, then Justin is latter. | Kelsey is placid. | contradiction |
Kelsey is not elated.
Stefan is elated.
Stefan is misty.
Danna is not elated.
Kelsey is latter.
Kelsey is misty.
Kelsey is not intelligent.
Uriah is intelligent.
Otis is not misty.
Gardner is placid.
Gardner is misty.
Kelsey is not placid.It can be concluded that Justin is latter once knowing that Kelsey is elated and Gardner is intelligent.
Someone who is elated is always placid.
If there is at least one people who is latter or misty, then Justin is not frantic.
Someone who is not placid is always not intelligent.
Someone is not elated and intelligent if and only if he is frantic.
Someone who is both placid and not latter is always misty.
If there is at least one people who is either elated or not placid, then Justin is misty and Gardner is not frantic.
Someone is not intelligent if and only if he is not misty.
Someone who is both elated and not misty is always intelligent.
Someone is misty and frantic if and only if he is not placid.
If someone is not placid or not frantic, then he is not misty.
If everyone is not misty, then Justin is latter. | Justin is misty. | self_contradiction |
Kelsey is not elated.
Stefan is elated.
Stefan is misty.
Danna is not elated.
Kelsey is latter.
Kelsey is misty.
Kelsey is not intelligent.
Uriah is intelligent.
Otis is not misty.
Gardner is placid.
Gardner is misty.
Kelsey is not placid.It can be concluded that Justin is latter once knowing that Kelsey is elated and Gardner is intelligent.
Someone who is elated is always placid.
If there is at least one people who is latter or misty, then Justin is not frantic.
Someone who is not placid is always not intelligent.
Someone is not elated and intelligent if and only if he is frantic.
Someone who is both placid and not latter is always misty.
If there is at least one people who is either elated or not placid, then Justin is misty and Gardner is not frantic.
Someone is not intelligent if and only if he is not misty.
Someone who is both elated and not misty is always intelligent.
Someone is misty and frantic if and only if he is not placid.
If someone is not placid or not frantic, then he is not misty.
If everyone is not misty, then Justin is latter. | Stefan is latter. | neutral |
Kelsey is not elated.
Stefan is elated.
Stefan is misty.
Danna is not elated.
Kelsey is latter.
Kelsey is misty.
Kelsey is not intelligent.
Uriah is intelligent.
Otis is not misty.
Gardner is placid.
Gardner is misty.
Kelsey is not placid.It can be concluded that Justin is latter once knowing that Kelsey is elated and Gardner is intelligent.
Someone who is elated is always placid.
If there is at least one people who is latter or misty, then Justin is not frantic.
Someone who is not placid is always not intelligent.
Someone is not elated and intelligent if and only if he is frantic.
Someone who is both placid and not latter is always misty.
If there is at least one people who is either elated or not placid, then Justin is misty and Gardner is not frantic.
Someone is not intelligent if and only if he is not misty.
Someone who is both elated and not misty is always intelligent.
Someone is misty and frantic if and only if he is not placid.
If someone is not placid or not frantic, then he is not misty.
If everyone is not misty, then Justin is latter. | Justin is not elated. | neutral |
Kelsey is not elated.
Stefan is elated.
Stefan is misty.
Danna is not elated.
Kelsey is latter.
Kelsey is misty.
Kelsey is not intelligent.
Uriah is intelligent.
Otis is not misty.
Gardner is placid.
Gardner is misty.
Kelsey is not placid.It can be concluded that Justin is latter once knowing that Kelsey is elated and Gardner is intelligent.
Someone who is elated is always placid.
If there is at least one people who is latter or misty, then Justin is not frantic.
Someone who is not placid is always not intelligent.
Someone is not elated and intelligent if and only if he is frantic.
Someone who is both placid and not latter is always misty.
If there is at least one people who is either elated or not placid, then Justin is misty and Gardner is not frantic.
Someone is not intelligent if and only if he is not misty.
Someone who is both elated and not misty is always intelligent.
Someone is misty and frantic if and only if he is not placid.
If someone is not placid or not frantic, then he is not misty.
If everyone is not misty, then Justin is latter. | Uriah is intelligent. | entailment |
Kelsey is not elated.
Stefan is elated.
Stefan is misty.
Danna is not elated.
Kelsey is latter.
Kelsey is misty.
Kelsey is not intelligent.
Uriah is intelligent.
Otis is not misty.
Gardner is placid.
Gardner is misty.
Kelsey is not placid.It can be concluded that Justin is latter once knowing that Kelsey is elated and Gardner is intelligent.
Someone who is elated is always placid.
If there is at least one people who is latter or misty, then Justin is not frantic.
Someone who is not placid is always not intelligent.
Someone is not elated and intelligent if and only if he is frantic.
Someone who is both placid and not latter is always misty.
If there is at least one people who is either elated or not placid, then Justin is misty and Gardner is not frantic.
Someone is not intelligent if and only if he is not misty.
Someone who is both elated and not misty is always intelligent.
Someone is misty and frantic if and only if he is not placid.
If someone is not placid or not frantic, then he is not misty.
If everyone is not misty, then Justin is latter. | Uriah is misty. | neutral |
Kelsey is not elated.
Stefan is elated.
Stefan is misty.
Danna is not elated.
Kelsey is latter.
Kelsey is misty.
Kelsey is not intelligent.
Uriah is intelligent.
Otis is not misty.
Gardner is placid.
Gardner is misty.
Kelsey is not placid.It can be concluded that Justin is latter once knowing that Kelsey is elated and Gardner is intelligent.
Someone who is elated is always placid.
If there is at least one people who is latter or misty, then Justin is not frantic.
Someone who is not placid is always not intelligent.
Someone is not elated and intelligent if and only if he is frantic.
Someone who is both placid and not latter is always misty.
If there is at least one people who is either elated or not placid, then Justin is misty and Gardner is not frantic.
Someone is not intelligent if and only if he is not misty.
Someone who is both elated and not misty is always intelligent.
Someone is misty and frantic if and only if he is not placid.
If someone is not placid or not frantic, then he is not misty.
If everyone is not misty, then Justin is latter. | Kelsey is misty. | self_contradiction |
Kelsey is not elated.
Stefan is elated.
Stefan is misty.
Danna is not elated.
Kelsey is latter.
Kelsey is misty.
Kelsey is not intelligent.
Uriah is intelligent.
Otis is not misty.
Gardner is placid.
Gardner is misty.
Kelsey is not placid.It can be concluded that Justin is latter once knowing that Kelsey is elated and Gardner is intelligent.
Someone who is elated is always placid.
If there is at least one people who is latter or misty, then Justin is not frantic.
Someone who is not placid is always not intelligent.
Someone is not elated and intelligent if and only if he is frantic.
Someone who is both placid and not latter is always misty.
If there is at least one people who is either elated or not placid, then Justin is misty and Gardner is not frantic.
Someone is not intelligent if and only if he is not misty.
Someone who is both elated and not misty is always intelligent.
Someone is misty and frantic if and only if he is not placid.
If someone is not placid or not frantic, then he is not misty.
If everyone is not misty, then Justin is latter. | Danna is not intelligent. | neutral |
Kelsey is not elated.
Stefan is elated.
Stefan is misty.
Danna is not elated.
Kelsey is latter.
Kelsey is misty.
Kelsey is not intelligent.
Uriah is intelligent.
Otis is not misty.
Gardner is placid.
Gardner is misty.
Kelsey is not placid.It can be concluded that Justin is latter once knowing that Kelsey is elated and Gardner is intelligent.
Someone who is elated is always placid.
If there is at least one people who is latter or misty, then Justin is not frantic.
Someone who is not placid is always not intelligent.
Someone is not elated and intelligent if and only if he is frantic.
Someone who is both placid and not latter is always misty.
If there is at least one people who is either elated or not placid, then Justin is misty and Gardner is not frantic.
Someone is not intelligent if and only if he is not misty.
Someone who is both elated and not misty is always intelligent.
Someone is misty and frantic if and only if he is not placid.
If someone is not placid or not frantic, then he is not misty.
If everyone is not misty, then Justin is latter. | Uriah is not placid. | neutral |
Kelsey is not elated.
Stefan is elated.
Stefan is misty.
Danna is not elated.
Kelsey is latter.
Kelsey is misty.
Kelsey is not intelligent.
Uriah is intelligent.
Otis is not misty.
Gardner is placid.
Gardner is misty.
Kelsey is not placid.It can be concluded that Justin is latter once knowing that Kelsey is elated and Gardner is intelligent.
Someone who is elated is always placid.
If there is at least one people who is latter or misty, then Justin is not frantic.
Someone who is not placid is always not intelligent.
Someone is not elated and intelligent if and only if he is frantic.
Someone who is both placid and not latter is always misty.
If there is at least one people who is either elated or not placid, then Justin is misty and Gardner is not frantic.
Someone is not intelligent if and only if he is not misty.
Someone who is both elated and not misty is always intelligent.
Someone is misty and frantic if and only if he is not placid.
If someone is not placid or not frantic, then he is not misty.
If everyone is not misty, then Justin is latter. | Kelsey is not misty. | self_contradiction |
Kelsey is not elated.
Stefan is elated.
Stefan is misty.
Danna is not elated.
Kelsey is latter.
Kelsey is misty.
Kelsey is not intelligent.
Uriah is intelligent.
Otis is not misty.
Gardner is placid.
Gardner is misty.
Kelsey is not placid.It can be concluded that Justin is latter once knowing that Kelsey is elated and Gardner is intelligent.
Someone who is elated is always placid.
If there is at least one people who is latter or misty, then Justin is not frantic.
Someone who is not placid is always not intelligent.
Someone is not elated and intelligent if and only if he is frantic.
Someone who is both placid and not latter is always misty.
If there is at least one people who is either elated or not placid, then Justin is misty and Gardner is not frantic.
Someone is not intelligent if and only if he is not misty.
Someone who is both elated and not misty is always intelligent.
Someone is misty and frantic if and only if he is not placid.
If someone is not placid or not frantic, then he is not misty.
If everyone is not misty, then Justin is latter. | Stefan is not placid. | contradiction |
Kelsey is not elated.
Stefan is elated.
Stefan is misty.
Danna is not elated.
Kelsey is latter.
Kelsey is misty.
Kelsey is not intelligent.
Uriah is intelligent.
Otis is not misty.
Gardner is placid.
Gardner is misty.
Kelsey is not placid.It can be concluded that Justin is latter once knowing that Kelsey is elated and Gardner is intelligent.
Someone who is elated is always placid.
If there is at least one people who is latter or misty, then Justin is not frantic.
Someone who is not placid is always not intelligent.
Someone is not elated and intelligent if and only if he is frantic.
Someone who is both placid and not latter is always misty.
If there is at least one people who is either elated or not placid, then Justin is misty and Gardner is not frantic.
Someone is not intelligent if and only if he is not misty.
Someone who is both elated and not misty is always intelligent.
Someone is misty and frantic if and only if he is not placid.
If someone is not placid or not frantic, then he is not misty.
If everyone is not misty, then Justin is latter. | Gardner is frantic. | contradiction |
Kelsey is not elated.
Stefan is elated.
Stefan is misty.
Danna is not elated.
Kelsey is latter.
Kelsey is misty.
Kelsey is not intelligent.
Uriah is intelligent.
Otis is not misty.
Gardner is placid.
Gardner is misty.
Kelsey is not placid.It can be concluded that Justin is latter once knowing that Kelsey is elated and Gardner is intelligent.
Someone who is elated is always placid.
If there is at least one people who is latter or misty, then Justin is not frantic.
Someone who is not placid is always not intelligent.
Someone is not elated and intelligent if and only if he is frantic.
Someone who is both placid and not latter is always misty.
If there is at least one people who is either elated or not placid, then Justin is misty and Gardner is not frantic.
Someone is not intelligent if and only if he is not misty.
Someone who is both elated and not misty is always intelligent.
Someone is misty and frantic if and only if he is not placid.
If someone is not placid or not frantic, then he is not misty.
If everyone is not misty, then Justin is latter. | Gardner is not misty. | self_contradiction |
Kelsey is not elated.
Stefan is elated.
Stefan is misty.
Danna is not elated.
Kelsey is latter.
Kelsey is misty.
Kelsey is not intelligent.
Uriah is intelligent.
Otis is not misty.
Gardner is placid.
Gardner is misty.
Kelsey is not placid.It can be concluded that Justin is latter once knowing that Kelsey is elated and Gardner is intelligent.
Someone who is elated is always placid.
If there is at least one people who is latter or misty, then Justin is not frantic.
Someone who is not placid is always not intelligent.
Someone is not elated and intelligent if and only if he is frantic.
Someone who is both placid and not latter is always misty.
If there is at least one people who is either elated or not placid, then Justin is misty and Gardner is not frantic.
Someone is not intelligent if and only if he is not misty.
Someone who is both elated and not misty is always intelligent.
Someone is misty and frantic if and only if he is not placid.
If someone is not placid or not frantic, then he is not misty.
If everyone is not misty, then Justin is latter. | Stefan is misty. | entailment |
Kelsey is not elated.
Stefan is elated.
Stefan is misty.
Danna is not elated.
Kelsey is latter.
Kelsey is misty.
Kelsey is not intelligent.
Uriah is intelligent.
Otis is not misty.
Gardner is placid.
Gardner is misty.
Kelsey is not placid.It can be concluded that Justin is latter once knowing that Kelsey is elated and Gardner is intelligent.
Someone who is elated is always placid.
If there is at least one people who is latter or misty, then Justin is not frantic.
Someone who is not placid is always not intelligent.
Someone is not elated and intelligent if and only if he is frantic.
Someone who is both placid and not latter is always misty.
If there is at least one people who is either elated or not placid, then Justin is misty and Gardner is not frantic.
Someone is not intelligent if and only if he is not misty.
Someone who is both elated and not misty is always intelligent.
Someone is misty and frantic if and only if he is not placid.
If someone is not placid or not frantic, then he is not misty.
If everyone is not misty, then Justin is latter. | Kelsey is latter. | entailment |
Kelsey is not elated.
Stefan is elated.
Stefan is misty.
Danna is not elated.
Kelsey is latter.
Kelsey is misty.
Kelsey is not intelligent.
Uriah is intelligent.
Otis is not misty.
Gardner is placid.
Gardner is misty.
Kelsey is not placid.It can be concluded that Justin is latter once knowing that Kelsey is elated and Gardner is intelligent.
Someone who is elated is always placid.
If there is at least one people who is latter or misty, then Justin is not frantic.
Someone who is not placid is always not intelligent.
Someone is not elated and intelligent if and only if he is frantic.
Someone who is both placid and not latter is always misty.
If there is at least one people who is either elated or not placid, then Justin is misty and Gardner is not frantic.
Someone is not intelligent if and only if he is not misty.
Someone who is both elated and not misty is always intelligent.
Someone is misty and frantic if and only if he is not placid.
If someone is not placid or not frantic, then he is not misty.
If everyone is not misty, then Justin is latter. | Gardner is placid. | entailment |
Kelsey is not elated.
Stefan is elated.
Stefan is misty.
Danna is not elated.
Kelsey is latter.
Kelsey is misty.
Kelsey is not intelligent.
Uriah is intelligent.
Otis is not misty.
Gardner is placid.
Gardner is misty.
Kelsey is not placid.It can be concluded that Justin is latter once knowing that Kelsey is elated and Gardner is intelligent.
Someone who is elated is always placid.
If there is at least one people who is latter or misty, then Justin is not frantic.
Someone who is not placid is always not intelligent.
Someone is not elated and intelligent if and only if he is frantic.
Someone who is both placid and not latter is always misty.
If there is at least one people who is either elated or not placid, then Justin is misty and Gardner is not frantic.
Someone is not intelligent if and only if he is not misty.
Someone who is both elated and not misty is always intelligent.
Someone is misty and frantic if and only if he is not placid.
If someone is not placid or not frantic, then he is not misty.
If everyone is not misty, then Justin is latter. | Gardner is not frantic. | entailment |
Kelsey is not elated.
Stefan is elated.
Stefan is misty.
Danna is not elated.
Kelsey is latter.
Kelsey is misty.
Kelsey is not intelligent.
Uriah is intelligent.
Otis is not misty.
Gardner is placid.
Gardner is misty.
Kelsey is not placid.It can be concluded that Justin is latter once knowing that Kelsey is elated and Gardner is intelligent.
Someone who is elated is always placid.
If there is at least one people who is latter or misty, then Justin is not frantic.
Someone who is not placid is always not intelligent.
Someone is not elated and intelligent if and only if he is frantic.
Someone who is both placid and not latter is always misty.
If there is at least one people who is either elated or not placid, then Justin is misty and Gardner is not frantic.
Someone is not intelligent if and only if he is not misty.
Someone who is both elated and not misty is always intelligent.
Someone is misty and frantic if and only if he is not placid.
If someone is not placid or not frantic, then he is not misty.
If everyone is not misty, then Justin is latter. | Justin is not misty. | self_contradiction |
Cecil is not historical.
Luna is cautious.
Rosie is zealous.
Bevis is historical.
Percival is cautious.
Rosie is superior.
Rosie is not cautious.
Cedric is not historical.
Bevis is beautiful.
Percival is superior.
Luna is zealous.
Bruce is adventurous.If Cecil is historical, then Bevis is not zealous, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Bevis is not historical and Percival is cautious once knowing that Bevis is not beautiful.
If someone is superior, then he is historical, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not beautiful and historical, then Luna is zealous.
If someone who is not historical is also not cautious, then he is not beautiful.
If someone is cautious or beautiful, then he is not historical.
Someone being both not cautious and historical is equivalent to being superior and beautiful.
Someone being both adventurous and not cautious is equivalent to being not superior and not beautiful.
All beautiful people are superior.
If someone is zealous or cautious, then he is adventurous.
If there is someone who is adventurous, then Bevis is not cautious.
It can be concluded that Percival is historical once knowing that Rosie is zealous and Cedric is not superior. | Rosie is cautious. | contradiction |
Cecil is not historical.
Luna is cautious.
Rosie is zealous.
Bevis is historical.
Percival is cautious.
Rosie is superior.
Rosie is not cautious.
Cedric is not historical.
Bevis is beautiful.
Percival is superior.
Luna is zealous.
Bruce is adventurous.If Cecil is historical, then Bevis is not zealous, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Bevis is not historical and Percival is cautious once knowing that Bevis is not beautiful.
If someone is superior, then he is historical, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not beautiful and historical, then Luna is zealous.
If someone who is not historical is also not cautious, then he is not beautiful.
If someone is cautious or beautiful, then he is not historical.
Someone being both not cautious and historical is equivalent to being superior and beautiful.
Someone being both adventurous and not cautious is equivalent to being not superior and not beautiful.
All beautiful people are superior.
If someone is zealous or cautious, then he is adventurous.
If there is someone who is adventurous, then Bevis is not cautious.
It can be concluded that Percival is historical once knowing that Rosie is zealous and Cedric is not superior. | Rosie is zealous. | entailment |
Cecil is not historical.
Luna is cautious.
Rosie is zealous.
Bevis is historical.
Percival is cautious.
Rosie is superior.
Rosie is not cautious.
Cedric is not historical.
Bevis is beautiful.
Percival is superior.
Luna is zealous.
Bruce is adventurous.If Cecil is historical, then Bevis is not zealous, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Bevis is not historical and Percival is cautious once knowing that Bevis is not beautiful.
If someone is superior, then he is historical, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not beautiful and historical, then Luna is zealous.
If someone who is not historical is also not cautious, then he is not beautiful.
If someone is cautious or beautiful, then he is not historical.
Someone being both not cautious and historical is equivalent to being superior and beautiful.
Someone being both adventurous and not cautious is equivalent to being not superior and not beautiful.
All beautiful people are superior.
If someone is zealous or cautious, then he is adventurous.
If there is someone who is adventurous, then Bevis is not cautious.
It can be concluded that Percival is historical once knowing that Rosie is zealous and Cedric is not superior. | Cedric is beautiful. | neutral |
Cecil is not historical.
Luna is cautious.
Rosie is zealous.
Bevis is historical.
Percival is cautious.
Rosie is superior.
Rosie is not cautious.
Cedric is not historical.
Bevis is beautiful.
Percival is superior.
Luna is zealous.
Bruce is adventurous.If Cecil is historical, then Bevis is not zealous, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Bevis is not historical and Percival is cautious once knowing that Bevis is not beautiful.
If someone is superior, then he is historical, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not beautiful and historical, then Luna is zealous.
If someone who is not historical is also not cautious, then he is not beautiful.
If someone is cautious or beautiful, then he is not historical.
Someone being both not cautious and historical is equivalent to being superior and beautiful.
Someone being both adventurous and not cautious is equivalent to being not superior and not beautiful.
All beautiful people are superior.
If someone is zealous or cautious, then he is adventurous.
If there is someone who is adventurous, then Bevis is not cautious.
It can be concluded that Percival is historical once knowing that Rosie is zealous and Cedric is not superior. | Cedric is not cautious. | neutral |
Cecil is not historical.
Luna is cautious.
Rosie is zealous.
Bevis is historical.
Percival is cautious.
Rosie is superior.
Rosie is not cautious.
Cedric is not historical.
Bevis is beautiful.
Percival is superior.
Luna is zealous.
Bruce is adventurous.If Cecil is historical, then Bevis is not zealous, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Bevis is not historical and Percival is cautious once knowing that Bevis is not beautiful.
If someone is superior, then he is historical, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not beautiful and historical, then Luna is zealous.
If someone who is not historical is also not cautious, then he is not beautiful.
If someone is cautious or beautiful, then he is not historical.
Someone being both not cautious and historical is equivalent to being superior and beautiful.
Someone being both adventurous and not cautious is equivalent to being not superior and not beautiful.
All beautiful people are superior.
If someone is zealous or cautious, then he is adventurous.
If there is someone who is adventurous, then Bevis is not cautious.
It can be concluded that Percival is historical once knowing that Rosie is zealous and Cedric is not superior. | Bevis is historical. | self_contradiction |
Cecil is not historical.
Luna is cautious.
Rosie is zealous.
Bevis is historical.
Percival is cautious.
Rosie is superior.
Rosie is not cautious.
Cedric is not historical.
Bevis is beautiful.
Percival is superior.
Luna is zealous.
Bruce is adventurous.If Cecil is historical, then Bevis is not zealous, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Bevis is not historical and Percival is cautious once knowing that Bevis is not beautiful.
If someone is superior, then he is historical, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not beautiful and historical, then Luna is zealous.
If someone who is not historical is also not cautious, then he is not beautiful.
If someone is cautious or beautiful, then he is not historical.
Someone being both not cautious and historical is equivalent to being superior and beautiful.
Someone being both adventurous and not cautious is equivalent to being not superior and not beautiful.
All beautiful people are superior.
If someone is zealous or cautious, then he is adventurous.
If there is someone who is adventurous, then Bevis is not cautious.
It can be concluded that Percival is historical once knowing that Rosie is zealous and Cedric is not superior. | Bevis is not beautiful. | self_contradiction |
Cecil is not historical.
Luna is cautious.
Rosie is zealous.
Bevis is historical.
Percival is cautious.
Rosie is superior.
Rosie is not cautious.
Cedric is not historical.
Bevis is beautiful.
Percival is superior.
Luna is zealous.
Bruce is adventurous.If Cecil is historical, then Bevis is not zealous, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Bevis is not historical and Percival is cautious once knowing that Bevis is not beautiful.
If someone is superior, then he is historical, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not beautiful and historical, then Luna is zealous.
If someone who is not historical is also not cautious, then he is not beautiful.
If someone is cautious or beautiful, then he is not historical.
Someone being both not cautious and historical is equivalent to being superior and beautiful.
Someone being both adventurous and not cautious is equivalent to being not superior and not beautiful.
All beautiful people are superior.
If someone is zealous or cautious, then he is adventurous.
If there is someone who is adventurous, then Bevis is not cautious.
It can be concluded that Percival is historical once knowing that Rosie is zealous and Cedric is not superior. | Luna is adventurous. | entailment |
Cecil is not historical.
Luna is cautious.
Rosie is zealous.
Bevis is historical.
Percival is cautious.
Rosie is superior.
Rosie is not cautious.
Cedric is not historical.
Bevis is beautiful.
Percival is superior.
Luna is zealous.
Bruce is adventurous.If Cecil is historical, then Bevis is not zealous, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Bevis is not historical and Percival is cautious once knowing that Bevis is not beautiful.
If someone is superior, then he is historical, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not beautiful and historical, then Luna is zealous.
If someone who is not historical is also not cautious, then he is not beautiful.
If someone is cautious or beautiful, then he is not historical.
Someone being both not cautious and historical is equivalent to being superior and beautiful.
Someone being both adventurous and not cautious is equivalent to being not superior and not beautiful.
All beautiful people are superior.
If someone is zealous or cautious, then he is adventurous.
If there is someone who is adventurous, then Bevis is not cautious.
It can be concluded that Percival is historical once knowing that Rosie is zealous and Cedric is not superior. | Percival is not superior. | contradiction |
Cecil is not historical.
Luna is cautious.
Rosie is zealous.
Bevis is historical.
Percival is cautious.
Rosie is superior.
Rosie is not cautious.
Cedric is not historical.
Bevis is beautiful.
Percival is superior.
Luna is zealous.
Bruce is adventurous.If Cecil is historical, then Bevis is not zealous, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Bevis is not historical and Percival is cautious once knowing that Bevis is not beautiful.
If someone is superior, then he is historical, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not beautiful and historical, then Luna is zealous.
If someone who is not historical is also not cautious, then he is not beautiful.
If someone is cautious or beautiful, then he is not historical.
Someone being both not cautious and historical is equivalent to being superior and beautiful.
Someone being both adventurous and not cautious is equivalent to being not superior and not beautiful.
All beautiful people are superior.
If someone is zealous or cautious, then he is adventurous.
If there is someone who is adventurous, then Bevis is not cautious.
It can be concluded that Percival is historical once knowing that Rosie is zealous and Cedric is not superior. | Cecil is historical. | contradiction |
Cecil is not historical.
Luna is cautious.
Rosie is zealous.
Bevis is historical.
Percival is cautious.
Rosie is superior.
Rosie is not cautious.
Cedric is not historical.
Bevis is beautiful.
Percival is superior.
Luna is zealous.
Bruce is adventurous.If Cecil is historical, then Bevis is not zealous, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Bevis is not historical and Percival is cautious once knowing that Bevis is not beautiful.
If someone is superior, then he is historical, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not beautiful and historical, then Luna is zealous.
If someone who is not historical is also not cautious, then he is not beautiful.
If someone is cautious or beautiful, then he is not historical.
Someone being both not cautious and historical is equivalent to being superior and beautiful.
Someone being both adventurous and not cautious is equivalent to being not superior and not beautiful.
All beautiful people are superior.
If someone is zealous or cautious, then he is adventurous.
If there is someone who is adventurous, then Bevis is not cautious.
It can be concluded that Percival is historical once knowing that Rosie is zealous and Cedric is not superior. | Luna is not adventurous. | contradiction |
Cecil is not historical.
Luna is cautious.
Rosie is zealous.
Bevis is historical.
Percival is cautious.
Rosie is superior.
Rosie is not cautious.
Cedric is not historical.
Bevis is beautiful.
Percival is superior.
Luna is zealous.
Bruce is adventurous.If Cecil is historical, then Bevis is not zealous, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Bevis is not historical and Percival is cautious once knowing that Bevis is not beautiful.
If someone is superior, then he is historical, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not beautiful and historical, then Luna is zealous.
If someone who is not historical is also not cautious, then he is not beautiful.
If someone is cautious or beautiful, then he is not historical.
Someone being both not cautious and historical is equivalent to being superior and beautiful.
Someone being both adventurous and not cautious is equivalent to being not superior and not beautiful.
All beautiful people are superior.
If someone is zealous or cautious, then he is adventurous.
If there is someone who is adventurous, then Bevis is not cautious.
It can be concluded that Percival is historical once knowing that Rosie is zealous and Cedric is not superior. | Rosie is not historical. | self_contradiction |
Cecil is not historical.
Luna is cautious.
Rosie is zealous.
Bevis is historical.
Percival is cautious.
Rosie is superior.
Rosie is not cautious.
Cedric is not historical.
Bevis is beautiful.
Percival is superior.
Luna is zealous.
Bruce is adventurous.If Cecil is historical, then Bevis is not zealous, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Bevis is not historical and Percival is cautious once knowing that Bevis is not beautiful.
If someone is superior, then he is historical, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not beautiful and historical, then Luna is zealous.
If someone who is not historical is also not cautious, then he is not beautiful.
If someone is cautious or beautiful, then he is not historical.
Someone being both not cautious and historical is equivalent to being superior and beautiful.
Someone being both adventurous and not cautious is equivalent to being not superior and not beautiful.
All beautiful people are superior.
If someone is zealous or cautious, then he is adventurous.
If there is someone who is adventurous, then Bevis is not cautious.
It can be concluded that Percival is historical once knowing that Rosie is zealous and Cedric is not superior. | Luna is not historical. | entailment |
Cecil is not historical.
Luna is cautious.
Rosie is zealous.
Bevis is historical.
Percival is cautious.
Rosie is superior.
Rosie is not cautious.
Cedric is not historical.
Bevis is beautiful.
Percival is superior.
Luna is zealous.
Bruce is adventurous.If Cecil is historical, then Bevis is not zealous, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Bevis is not historical and Percival is cautious once knowing that Bevis is not beautiful.
If someone is superior, then he is historical, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not beautiful and historical, then Luna is zealous.
If someone who is not historical is also not cautious, then he is not beautiful.
If someone is cautious or beautiful, then he is not historical.
Someone being both not cautious and historical is equivalent to being superior and beautiful.
Someone being both adventurous and not cautious is equivalent to being not superior and not beautiful.
All beautiful people are superior.
If someone is zealous or cautious, then he is adventurous.
If there is someone who is adventurous, then Bevis is not cautious.
It can be concluded that Percival is historical once knowing that Rosie is zealous and Cedric is not superior. | Cedric is historical. | contradiction |
Cecil is not historical.
Luna is cautious.
Rosie is zealous.
Bevis is historical.
Percival is cautious.
Rosie is superior.
Rosie is not cautious.
Cedric is not historical.
Bevis is beautiful.
Percival is superior.
Luna is zealous.
Bruce is adventurous.If Cecil is historical, then Bevis is not zealous, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Bevis is not historical and Percival is cautious once knowing that Bevis is not beautiful.
If someone is superior, then he is historical, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not beautiful and historical, then Luna is zealous.
If someone who is not historical is also not cautious, then he is not beautiful.
If someone is cautious or beautiful, then he is not historical.
Someone being both not cautious and historical is equivalent to being superior and beautiful.
Someone being both adventurous and not cautious is equivalent to being not superior and not beautiful.
All beautiful people are superior.
If someone is zealous or cautious, then he is adventurous.
If there is someone who is adventurous, then Bevis is not cautious.
It can be concluded that Percival is historical once knowing that Rosie is zealous and Cedric is not superior. | Rosie is adventurous. | entailment |
Cecil is not historical.
Luna is cautious.
Rosie is zealous.
Bevis is historical.
Percival is cautious.
Rosie is superior.
Rosie is not cautious.
Cedric is not historical.
Bevis is beautiful.
Percival is superior.
Luna is zealous.
Bruce is adventurous.If Cecil is historical, then Bevis is not zealous, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Bevis is not historical and Percival is cautious once knowing that Bevis is not beautiful.
If someone is superior, then he is historical, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not beautiful and historical, then Luna is zealous.
If someone who is not historical is also not cautious, then he is not beautiful.
If someone is cautious or beautiful, then he is not historical.
Someone being both not cautious and historical is equivalent to being superior and beautiful.
Someone being both adventurous and not cautious is equivalent to being not superior and not beautiful.
All beautiful people are superior.
If someone is zealous or cautious, then he is adventurous.
If there is someone who is adventurous, then Bevis is not cautious.
It can be concluded that Percival is historical once knowing that Rosie is zealous and Cedric is not superior. | Bevis is beautiful. | self_contradiction |
Cecil is not historical.
Luna is cautious.
Rosie is zealous.
Bevis is historical.
Percival is cautious.
Rosie is superior.
Rosie is not cautious.
Cedric is not historical.
Bevis is beautiful.
Percival is superior.
Luna is zealous.
Bruce is adventurous.If Cecil is historical, then Bevis is not zealous, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Bevis is not historical and Percival is cautious once knowing that Bevis is not beautiful.
If someone is superior, then he is historical, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not beautiful and historical, then Luna is zealous.
If someone who is not historical is also not cautious, then he is not beautiful.
If someone is cautious or beautiful, then he is not historical.
Someone being both not cautious and historical is equivalent to being superior and beautiful.
Someone being both adventurous and not cautious is equivalent to being not superior and not beautiful.
All beautiful people are superior.
If someone is zealous or cautious, then he is adventurous.
If there is someone who is adventurous, then Bevis is not cautious.
It can be concluded that Percival is historical once knowing that Rosie is zealous and Cedric is not superior. | Percival is not zealous. | neutral |
Cecil is not historical.
Luna is cautious.
Rosie is zealous.
Bevis is historical.
Percival is cautious.
Rosie is superior.
Rosie is not cautious.
Cedric is not historical.
Bevis is beautiful.
Percival is superior.
Luna is zealous.
Bruce is adventurous.If Cecil is historical, then Bevis is not zealous, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Bevis is not historical and Percival is cautious once knowing that Bevis is not beautiful.
If someone is superior, then he is historical, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not beautiful and historical, then Luna is zealous.
If someone who is not historical is also not cautious, then he is not beautiful.
If someone is cautious or beautiful, then he is not historical.
Someone being both not cautious and historical is equivalent to being superior and beautiful.
Someone being both adventurous and not cautious is equivalent to being not superior and not beautiful.
All beautiful people are superior.
If someone is zealous or cautious, then he is adventurous.
If there is someone who is adventurous, then Bevis is not cautious.
It can be concluded that Percival is historical once knowing that Rosie is zealous and Cedric is not superior. | Cedric is not superior. | neutral |
Cecil is not historical.
Luna is cautious.
Rosie is zealous.
Bevis is historical.
Percival is cautious.
Rosie is superior.
Rosie is not cautious.
Cedric is not historical.
Bevis is beautiful.
Percival is superior.
Luna is zealous.
Bruce is adventurous.If Cecil is historical, then Bevis is not zealous, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Bevis is not historical and Percival is cautious once knowing that Bevis is not beautiful.
If someone is superior, then he is historical, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not beautiful and historical, then Luna is zealous.
If someone who is not historical is also not cautious, then he is not beautiful.
If someone is cautious or beautiful, then he is not historical.
Someone being both not cautious and historical is equivalent to being superior and beautiful.
Someone being both adventurous and not cautious is equivalent to being not superior and not beautiful.
All beautiful people are superior.
If someone is zealous or cautious, then he is adventurous.
If there is someone who is adventurous, then Bevis is not cautious.
It can be concluded that Percival is historical once knowing that Rosie is zealous and Cedric is not superior. | Bevis is not zealous. | neutral |
Cecil is not historical.
Luna is cautious.
Rosie is zealous.
Bevis is historical.
Percival is cautious.
Rosie is superior.
Rosie is not cautious.
Cedric is not historical.
Bevis is beautiful.
Percival is superior.
Luna is zealous.
Bruce is adventurous.If Cecil is historical, then Bevis is not zealous, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Bevis is not historical and Percival is cautious once knowing that Bevis is not beautiful.
If someone is superior, then he is historical, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not beautiful and historical, then Luna is zealous.
If someone who is not historical is also not cautious, then he is not beautiful.
If someone is cautious or beautiful, then he is not historical.
Someone being both not cautious and historical is equivalent to being superior and beautiful.
Someone being both adventurous and not cautious is equivalent to being not superior and not beautiful.
All beautiful people are superior.
If someone is zealous or cautious, then he is adventurous.
If there is someone who is adventurous, then Bevis is not cautious.
It can be concluded that Percival is historical once knowing that Rosie is zealous and Cedric is not superior. | Cecil is not historical. | entailment |
Cecil is not historical.
Luna is cautious.
Rosie is zealous.
Bevis is historical.
Percival is cautious.
Rosie is superior.
Rosie is not cautious.
Cedric is not historical.
Bevis is beautiful.
Percival is superior.
Luna is zealous.
Bruce is adventurous.If Cecil is historical, then Bevis is not zealous, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Bevis is not historical and Percival is cautious once knowing that Bevis is not beautiful.
If someone is superior, then he is historical, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not beautiful and historical, then Luna is zealous.
If someone who is not historical is also not cautious, then he is not beautiful.
If someone is cautious or beautiful, then he is not historical.
Someone being both not cautious and historical is equivalent to being superior and beautiful.
Someone being both adventurous and not cautious is equivalent to being not superior and not beautiful.
All beautiful people are superior.
If someone is zealous or cautious, then he is adventurous.
If there is someone who is adventurous, then Bevis is not cautious.
It can be concluded that Percival is historical once knowing that Rosie is zealous and Cedric is not superior. | Bevis is not historical. | self_contradiction |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.