premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
James is odd.
James is not grotesque.
Kimberly is magnificent.
Kendall is odd.
Rosie is not nice.
Rosie is grotesque.
Rosie is not magnificent.
Blanca is not grotesque.
Kimberly is not famous.
Kimberly is not grotesque.
Corwin is nice.
Randolph is not magnificent.If someone is friendly or not famous, then he is magnificent.
All not famous people are not magnificent.
Someone who is not grotesque is always both not magnificent and not odd.
As long as someone is either grotesque or not magnificent, he is friendly and not nice.
If someone who is nice is also not famous, then he is friendly.
Someone who is nice is always not magnificent.
If someone is famous or he is not magnificent, then he is friendly.
If there is at least one people who is both odd and nice, then Randolph is famous.
If there is someone who is either grotesque or not friendly, then James is not nice.
If there is at least one people who is odd, then Rosie is nice and Randolph is not famous.
Corwin being magnificent is equivalent to Rosie being famous.
It can be concluded that Randolph is not nice once knowing that Kendall is famous or Kendall is not friendly. | Kendall is not nice. | neutral |
James is odd.
James is not grotesque.
Kimberly is magnificent.
Kendall is odd.
Rosie is not nice.
Rosie is grotesque.
Rosie is not magnificent.
Blanca is not grotesque.
Kimberly is not famous.
Kimberly is not grotesque.
Corwin is nice.
Randolph is not magnificent.If someone is friendly or not famous, then he is magnificent.
All not famous people are not magnificent.
Someone who is not grotesque is always both not magnificent and not odd.
As long as someone is either grotesque or not magnificent, he is friendly and not nice.
If someone who is nice is also not famous, then he is friendly.
Someone who is nice is always not magnificent.
If someone is famous or he is not magnificent, then he is friendly.
If there is at least one people who is both odd and nice, then Randolph is famous.
If there is someone who is either grotesque or not friendly, then James is not nice.
If there is at least one people who is odd, then Rosie is nice and Randolph is not famous.
Corwin being magnificent is equivalent to Rosie being famous.
It can be concluded that Randolph is not nice once knowing that Kendall is famous or Kendall is not friendly. | Blanca is not friendly. | contradiction |
James is odd.
James is not grotesque.
Kimberly is magnificent.
Kendall is odd.
Rosie is not nice.
Rosie is grotesque.
Rosie is not magnificent.
Blanca is not grotesque.
Kimberly is not famous.
Kimberly is not grotesque.
Corwin is nice.
Randolph is not magnificent.If someone is friendly or not famous, then he is magnificent.
All not famous people are not magnificent.
Someone who is not grotesque is always both not magnificent and not odd.
As long as someone is either grotesque or not magnificent, he is friendly and not nice.
If someone who is nice is also not famous, then he is friendly.
Someone who is nice is always not magnificent.
If someone is famous or he is not magnificent, then he is friendly.
If there is at least one people who is both odd and nice, then Randolph is famous.
If there is someone who is either grotesque or not friendly, then James is not nice.
If there is at least one people who is odd, then Rosie is nice and Randolph is not famous.
Corwin being magnificent is equivalent to Rosie being famous.
It can be concluded that Randolph is not nice once knowing that Kendall is famous or Kendall is not friendly. | Kendall is not odd. | contradiction |
James is odd.
James is not grotesque.
Kimberly is magnificent.
Kendall is odd.
Rosie is not nice.
Rosie is grotesque.
Rosie is not magnificent.
Blanca is not grotesque.
Kimberly is not famous.
Kimberly is not grotesque.
Corwin is nice.
Randolph is not magnificent.If someone is friendly or not famous, then he is magnificent.
All not famous people are not magnificent.
Someone who is not grotesque is always both not magnificent and not odd.
As long as someone is either grotesque or not magnificent, he is friendly and not nice.
If someone who is nice is also not famous, then he is friendly.
Someone who is nice is always not magnificent.
If someone is famous or he is not magnificent, then he is friendly.
If there is at least one people who is both odd and nice, then Randolph is famous.
If there is someone who is either grotesque or not friendly, then James is not nice.
If there is at least one people who is odd, then Rosie is nice and Randolph is not famous.
Corwin being magnificent is equivalent to Rosie being famous.
It can be concluded that Randolph is not nice once knowing that Kendall is famous or Kendall is not friendly. | Blanca is not grotesque. | entailment |
James is odd.
James is not grotesque.
Kimberly is magnificent.
Kendall is odd.
Rosie is not nice.
Rosie is grotesque.
Rosie is not magnificent.
Blanca is not grotesque.
Kimberly is not famous.
Kimberly is not grotesque.
Corwin is nice.
Randolph is not magnificent.If someone is friendly or not famous, then he is magnificent.
All not famous people are not magnificent.
Someone who is not grotesque is always both not magnificent and not odd.
As long as someone is either grotesque or not magnificent, he is friendly and not nice.
If someone who is nice is also not famous, then he is friendly.
Someone who is nice is always not magnificent.
If someone is famous or he is not magnificent, then he is friendly.
If there is at least one people who is both odd and nice, then Randolph is famous.
If there is someone who is either grotesque or not friendly, then James is not nice.
If there is at least one people who is odd, then Rosie is nice and Randolph is not famous.
Corwin being magnificent is equivalent to Rosie being famous.
It can be concluded that Randolph is not nice once knowing that Kendall is famous or Kendall is not friendly. | James is grotesque. | contradiction |
James is odd.
James is not grotesque.
Kimberly is magnificent.
Kendall is odd.
Rosie is not nice.
Rosie is grotesque.
Rosie is not magnificent.
Blanca is not grotesque.
Kimberly is not famous.
Kimberly is not grotesque.
Corwin is nice.
Randolph is not magnificent.If someone is friendly or not famous, then he is magnificent.
All not famous people are not magnificent.
Someone who is not grotesque is always both not magnificent and not odd.
As long as someone is either grotesque or not magnificent, he is friendly and not nice.
If someone who is nice is also not famous, then he is friendly.
Someone who is nice is always not magnificent.
If someone is famous or he is not magnificent, then he is friendly.
If there is at least one people who is both odd and nice, then Randolph is famous.
If there is someone who is either grotesque or not friendly, then James is not nice.
If there is at least one people who is odd, then Rosie is nice and Randolph is not famous.
Corwin being magnificent is equivalent to Rosie being famous.
It can be concluded that Randolph is not nice once knowing that Kendall is famous or Kendall is not friendly. | Kimberly is not odd. | entailment |
James is odd.
James is not grotesque.
Kimberly is magnificent.
Kendall is odd.
Rosie is not nice.
Rosie is grotesque.
Rosie is not magnificent.
Blanca is not grotesque.
Kimberly is not famous.
Kimberly is not grotesque.
Corwin is nice.
Randolph is not magnificent.If someone is friendly or not famous, then he is magnificent.
All not famous people are not magnificent.
Someone who is not grotesque is always both not magnificent and not odd.
As long as someone is either grotesque or not magnificent, he is friendly and not nice.
If someone who is nice is also not famous, then he is friendly.
Someone who is nice is always not magnificent.
If someone is famous or he is not magnificent, then he is friendly.
If there is at least one people who is both odd and nice, then Randolph is famous.
If there is someone who is either grotesque or not friendly, then James is not nice.
If there is at least one people who is odd, then Rosie is nice and Randolph is not famous.
Corwin being magnificent is equivalent to Rosie being famous.
It can be concluded that Randolph is not nice once knowing that Kendall is famous or Kendall is not friendly. | Blanca is not famous. | neutral |
James is odd.
James is not grotesque.
Kimberly is magnificent.
Kendall is odd.
Rosie is not nice.
Rosie is grotesque.
Rosie is not magnificent.
Blanca is not grotesque.
Kimberly is not famous.
Kimberly is not grotesque.
Corwin is nice.
Randolph is not magnificent.If someone is friendly or not famous, then he is magnificent.
All not famous people are not magnificent.
Someone who is not grotesque is always both not magnificent and not odd.
As long as someone is either grotesque or not magnificent, he is friendly and not nice.
If someone who is nice is also not famous, then he is friendly.
Someone who is nice is always not magnificent.
If someone is famous or he is not magnificent, then he is friendly.
If there is at least one people who is both odd and nice, then Randolph is famous.
If there is someone who is either grotesque or not friendly, then James is not nice.
If there is at least one people who is odd, then Rosie is nice and Randolph is not famous.
Corwin being magnificent is equivalent to Rosie being famous.
It can be concluded that Randolph is not nice once knowing that Kendall is famous or Kendall is not friendly. | Rosie is famous. | entailment |
James is odd.
James is not grotesque.
Kimberly is magnificent.
Kendall is odd.
Rosie is not nice.
Rosie is grotesque.
Rosie is not magnificent.
Blanca is not grotesque.
Kimberly is not famous.
Kimberly is not grotesque.
Corwin is nice.
Randolph is not magnificent.If someone is friendly or not famous, then he is magnificent.
All not famous people are not magnificent.
Someone who is not grotesque is always both not magnificent and not odd.
As long as someone is either grotesque or not magnificent, he is friendly and not nice.
If someone who is nice is also not famous, then he is friendly.
Someone who is nice is always not magnificent.
If someone is famous or he is not magnificent, then he is friendly.
If there is at least one people who is both odd and nice, then Randolph is famous.
If there is someone who is either grotesque or not friendly, then James is not nice.
If there is at least one people who is odd, then Rosie is nice and Randolph is not famous.
Corwin being magnificent is equivalent to Rosie being famous.
It can be concluded that Randolph is not nice once knowing that Kendall is famous or Kendall is not friendly. | Rosie is not magnificent. | self_contradiction |
James is odd.
James is not grotesque.
Kimberly is magnificent.
Kendall is odd.
Rosie is not nice.
Rosie is grotesque.
Rosie is not magnificent.
Blanca is not grotesque.
Kimberly is not famous.
Kimberly is not grotesque.
Corwin is nice.
Randolph is not magnificent.If someone is friendly or not famous, then he is magnificent.
All not famous people are not magnificent.
Someone who is not grotesque is always both not magnificent and not odd.
As long as someone is either grotesque or not magnificent, he is friendly and not nice.
If someone who is nice is also not famous, then he is friendly.
Someone who is nice is always not magnificent.
If someone is famous or he is not magnificent, then he is friendly.
If there is at least one people who is both odd and nice, then Randolph is famous.
If there is someone who is either grotesque or not friendly, then James is not nice.
If there is at least one people who is odd, then Rosie is nice and Randolph is not famous.
Corwin being magnificent is equivalent to Rosie being famous.
It can be concluded that Randolph is not nice once knowing that Kendall is famous or Kendall is not friendly. | Kimberly is magnificent. | self_contradiction |
James is odd.
James is not grotesque.
Kimberly is magnificent.
Kendall is odd.
Rosie is not nice.
Rosie is grotesque.
Rosie is not magnificent.
Blanca is not grotesque.
Kimberly is not famous.
Kimberly is not grotesque.
Corwin is nice.
Randolph is not magnificent.If someone is friendly or not famous, then he is magnificent.
All not famous people are not magnificent.
Someone who is not grotesque is always both not magnificent and not odd.
As long as someone is either grotesque or not magnificent, he is friendly and not nice.
If someone who is nice is also not famous, then he is friendly.
Someone who is nice is always not magnificent.
If someone is famous or he is not magnificent, then he is friendly.
If there is at least one people who is both odd and nice, then Randolph is famous.
If there is someone who is either grotesque or not friendly, then James is not nice.
If there is at least one people who is odd, then Rosie is nice and Randolph is not famous.
Corwin being magnificent is equivalent to Rosie being famous.
It can be concluded that Randolph is not nice once knowing that Kendall is famous or Kendall is not friendly. | Kimberly is not grotesque. | entailment |
James is odd.
James is not grotesque.
Kimberly is magnificent.
Kendall is odd.
Rosie is not nice.
Rosie is grotesque.
Rosie is not magnificent.
Blanca is not grotesque.
Kimberly is not famous.
Kimberly is not grotesque.
Corwin is nice.
Randolph is not magnificent.If someone is friendly or not famous, then he is magnificent.
All not famous people are not magnificent.
Someone who is not grotesque is always both not magnificent and not odd.
As long as someone is either grotesque or not magnificent, he is friendly and not nice.
If someone who is nice is also not famous, then he is friendly.
Someone who is nice is always not magnificent.
If someone is famous or he is not magnificent, then he is friendly.
If there is at least one people who is both odd and nice, then Randolph is famous.
If there is someone who is either grotesque or not friendly, then James is not nice.
If there is at least one people who is odd, then Rosie is nice and Randolph is not famous.
Corwin being magnificent is equivalent to Rosie being famous.
It can be concluded that Randolph is not nice once knowing that Kendall is famous or Kendall is not friendly. | Kendall is friendly. | neutral |
James is odd.
James is not grotesque.
Kimberly is magnificent.
Kendall is odd.
Rosie is not nice.
Rosie is grotesque.
Rosie is not magnificent.
Blanca is not grotesque.
Kimberly is not famous.
Kimberly is not grotesque.
Corwin is nice.
Randolph is not magnificent.If someone is friendly or not famous, then he is magnificent.
All not famous people are not magnificent.
Someone who is not grotesque is always both not magnificent and not odd.
As long as someone is either grotesque or not magnificent, he is friendly and not nice.
If someone who is nice is also not famous, then he is friendly.
Someone who is nice is always not magnificent.
If someone is famous or he is not magnificent, then he is friendly.
If there is at least one people who is both odd and nice, then Randolph is famous.
If there is someone who is either grotesque or not friendly, then James is not nice.
If there is at least one people who is odd, then Rosie is nice and Randolph is not famous.
Corwin being magnificent is equivalent to Rosie being famous.
It can be concluded that Randolph is not nice once knowing that Kendall is famous or Kendall is not friendly. | Blanca is magnificent. | self_contradiction |
James is odd.
James is not grotesque.
Kimberly is magnificent.
Kendall is odd.
Rosie is not nice.
Rosie is grotesque.
Rosie is not magnificent.
Blanca is not grotesque.
Kimberly is not famous.
Kimberly is not grotesque.
Corwin is nice.
Randolph is not magnificent.If someone is friendly or not famous, then he is magnificent.
All not famous people are not magnificent.
Someone who is not grotesque is always both not magnificent and not odd.
As long as someone is either grotesque or not magnificent, he is friendly and not nice.
If someone who is nice is also not famous, then he is friendly.
Someone who is nice is always not magnificent.
If someone is famous or he is not magnificent, then he is friendly.
If there is at least one people who is both odd and nice, then Randolph is famous.
If there is someone who is either grotesque or not friendly, then James is not nice.
If there is at least one people who is odd, then Rosie is nice and Randolph is not famous.
Corwin being magnificent is equivalent to Rosie being famous.
It can be concluded that Randolph is not nice once knowing that Kendall is famous or Kendall is not friendly. | Corwin is famous. | neutral |
James is odd.
James is not grotesque.
Kimberly is magnificent.
Kendall is odd.
Rosie is not nice.
Rosie is grotesque.
Rosie is not magnificent.
Blanca is not grotesque.
Kimberly is not famous.
Kimberly is not grotesque.
Corwin is nice.
Randolph is not magnificent.If someone is friendly or not famous, then he is magnificent.
All not famous people are not magnificent.
Someone who is not grotesque is always both not magnificent and not odd.
As long as someone is either grotesque or not magnificent, he is friendly and not nice.
If someone who is nice is also not famous, then he is friendly.
Someone who is nice is always not magnificent.
If someone is famous or he is not magnificent, then he is friendly.
If there is at least one people who is both odd and nice, then Randolph is famous.
If there is someone who is either grotesque or not friendly, then James is not nice.
If there is at least one people who is odd, then Rosie is nice and Randolph is not famous.
Corwin being magnificent is equivalent to Rosie being famous.
It can be concluded that Randolph is not nice once knowing that Kendall is famous or Kendall is not friendly. | Randolph is nice. | contradiction |
James is odd.
James is not grotesque.
Kimberly is magnificent.
Kendall is odd.
Rosie is not nice.
Rosie is grotesque.
Rosie is not magnificent.
Blanca is not grotesque.
Kimberly is not famous.
Kimberly is not grotesque.
Corwin is nice.
Randolph is not magnificent.If someone is friendly or not famous, then he is magnificent.
All not famous people are not magnificent.
Someone who is not grotesque is always both not magnificent and not odd.
As long as someone is either grotesque or not magnificent, he is friendly and not nice.
If someone who is nice is also not famous, then he is friendly.
Someone who is nice is always not magnificent.
If someone is famous or he is not magnificent, then he is friendly.
If there is at least one people who is both odd and nice, then Randolph is famous.
If there is someone who is either grotesque or not friendly, then James is not nice.
If there is at least one people who is odd, then Rosie is nice and Randolph is not famous.
Corwin being magnificent is equivalent to Rosie being famous.
It can be concluded that Randolph is not nice once knowing that Kendall is famous or Kendall is not friendly. | James is not grotesque. | entailment |
James is odd.
James is not grotesque.
Kimberly is magnificent.
Kendall is odd.
Rosie is not nice.
Rosie is grotesque.
Rosie is not magnificent.
Blanca is not grotesque.
Kimberly is not famous.
Kimberly is not grotesque.
Corwin is nice.
Randolph is not magnificent.If someone is friendly or not famous, then he is magnificent.
All not famous people are not magnificent.
Someone who is not grotesque is always both not magnificent and not odd.
As long as someone is either grotesque or not magnificent, he is friendly and not nice.
If someone who is nice is also not famous, then he is friendly.
Someone who is nice is always not magnificent.
If someone is famous or he is not magnificent, then he is friendly.
If there is at least one people who is both odd and nice, then Randolph is famous.
If there is someone who is either grotesque or not friendly, then James is not nice.
If there is at least one people who is odd, then Rosie is nice and Randolph is not famous.
Corwin being magnificent is equivalent to Rosie being famous.
It can be concluded that Randolph is not nice once knowing that Kendall is famous or Kendall is not friendly. | Randolph is not grotesque. | neutral |
James is odd.
James is not grotesque.
Kimberly is magnificent.
Kendall is odd.
Rosie is not nice.
Rosie is grotesque.
Rosie is not magnificent.
Blanca is not grotesque.
Kimberly is not famous.
Kimberly is not grotesque.
Corwin is nice.
Randolph is not magnificent.If someone is friendly or not famous, then he is magnificent.
All not famous people are not magnificent.
Someone who is not grotesque is always both not magnificent and not odd.
As long as someone is either grotesque or not magnificent, he is friendly and not nice.
If someone who is nice is also not famous, then he is friendly.
Someone who is nice is always not magnificent.
If someone is famous or he is not magnificent, then he is friendly.
If there is at least one people who is both odd and nice, then Randolph is famous.
If there is someone who is either grotesque or not friendly, then James is not nice.
If there is at least one people who is odd, then Rosie is nice and Randolph is not famous.
Corwin being magnificent is equivalent to Rosie being famous.
It can be concluded that Randolph is not nice once knowing that Kendall is famous or Kendall is not friendly. | Randolph is not famous. | self_contradiction |
James is odd.
James is not grotesque.
Kimberly is magnificent.
Kendall is odd.
Rosie is not nice.
Rosie is grotesque.
Rosie is not magnificent.
Blanca is not grotesque.
Kimberly is not famous.
Kimberly is not grotesque.
Corwin is nice.
Randolph is not magnificent.If someone is friendly or not famous, then he is magnificent.
All not famous people are not magnificent.
Someone who is not grotesque is always both not magnificent and not odd.
As long as someone is either grotesque or not magnificent, he is friendly and not nice.
If someone who is nice is also not famous, then he is friendly.
Someone who is nice is always not magnificent.
If someone is famous or he is not magnificent, then he is friendly.
If there is at least one people who is both odd and nice, then Randolph is famous.
If there is someone who is either grotesque or not friendly, then James is not nice.
If there is at least one people who is odd, then Rosie is nice and Randolph is not famous.
Corwin being magnificent is equivalent to Rosie being famous.
It can be concluded that Randolph is not nice once knowing that Kendall is famous or Kendall is not friendly. | James is not friendly. | contradiction |
James is odd.
James is not grotesque.
Kimberly is magnificent.
Kendall is odd.
Rosie is not nice.
Rosie is grotesque.
Rosie is not magnificent.
Blanca is not grotesque.
Kimberly is not famous.
Kimberly is not grotesque.
Corwin is nice.
Randolph is not magnificent.If someone is friendly or not famous, then he is magnificent.
All not famous people are not magnificent.
Someone who is not grotesque is always both not magnificent and not odd.
As long as someone is either grotesque or not magnificent, he is friendly and not nice.
If someone who is nice is also not famous, then he is friendly.
Someone who is nice is always not magnificent.
If someone is famous or he is not magnificent, then he is friendly.
If there is at least one people who is both odd and nice, then Randolph is famous.
If there is someone who is either grotesque or not friendly, then James is not nice.
If there is at least one people who is odd, then Rosie is nice and Randolph is not famous.
Corwin being magnificent is equivalent to Rosie being famous.
It can be concluded that Randolph is not nice once knowing that Kendall is famous or Kendall is not friendly. | Randolph is magnificent. | self_contradiction |
Theobold is not glorious.
Kimberly is not hypocritical.
Brent is every.
Theobold is not rare.
Teresa is available.
Aidan is not available.
Miranda is not available.
Theobold is not orange.
Aidan is not every.
Kimberly is not orange.
Aidan is not orange.
Theobold is hypocritical.If there is at least one people who is both not available and not every, then Hunter is rare.
Hunter being not orange is equivalent to Teresa being every.
It can be concluded that Miranda is glorious and Theobold is rare once knowing that Kimberly is every.
All not available people are orange.
It can be concluded that Teresa is every once knowing that Kimberly is rare or Teresa is available.
Someone who is glorious or not every is always orange and not rare.
Someone being both not hypocritical and every is equivalent to being glorious.
If all people are not glorious or not hypocritical, then Theobold is not orange.
If there is someone who is not every, then Brent is not rare.
If there is someone who is either available or not glorious, then Teresa is not orange and Aidan is not every.
Kimberly being not orange implies that Brent is every.
Someone being every is equivalent to being orange. | Aidan is glorious. | neutral |
Theobold is not glorious.
Kimberly is not hypocritical.
Brent is every.
Theobold is not rare.
Teresa is available.
Aidan is not available.
Miranda is not available.
Theobold is not orange.
Aidan is not every.
Kimberly is not orange.
Aidan is not orange.
Theobold is hypocritical.If there is at least one people who is both not available and not every, then Hunter is rare.
Hunter being not orange is equivalent to Teresa being every.
It can be concluded that Miranda is glorious and Theobold is rare once knowing that Kimberly is every.
All not available people are orange.
It can be concluded that Teresa is every once knowing that Kimberly is rare or Teresa is available.
Someone who is glorious or not every is always orange and not rare.
Someone being both not hypocritical and every is equivalent to being glorious.
If all people are not glorious or not hypocritical, then Theobold is not orange.
If there is someone who is not every, then Brent is not rare.
If there is someone who is either available or not glorious, then Teresa is not orange and Aidan is not every.
Kimberly being not orange implies that Brent is every.
Someone being every is equivalent to being orange. | Theobold is hypocritical. | entailment |
Theobold is not glorious.
Kimberly is not hypocritical.
Brent is every.
Theobold is not rare.
Teresa is available.
Aidan is not available.
Miranda is not available.
Theobold is not orange.
Aidan is not every.
Kimberly is not orange.
Aidan is not orange.
Theobold is hypocritical.If there is at least one people who is both not available and not every, then Hunter is rare.
Hunter being not orange is equivalent to Teresa being every.
It can be concluded that Miranda is glorious and Theobold is rare once knowing that Kimberly is every.
All not available people are orange.
It can be concluded that Teresa is every once knowing that Kimberly is rare or Teresa is available.
Someone who is glorious or not every is always orange and not rare.
Someone being both not hypocritical and every is equivalent to being glorious.
If all people are not glorious or not hypocritical, then Theobold is not orange.
If there is someone who is not every, then Brent is not rare.
If there is someone who is either available or not glorious, then Teresa is not orange and Aidan is not every.
Kimberly being not orange implies that Brent is every.
Someone being every is equivalent to being orange. | Teresa is not glorious. | neutral |
Theobold is not glorious.
Kimberly is not hypocritical.
Brent is every.
Theobold is not rare.
Teresa is available.
Aidan is not available.
Miranda is not available.
Theobold is not orange.
Aidan is not every.
Kimberly is not orange.
Aidan is not orange.
Theobold is hypocritical.If there is at least one people who is both not available and not every, then Hunter is rare.
Hunter being not orange is equivalent to Teresa being every.
It can be concluded that Miranda is glorious and Theobold is rare once knowing that Kimberly is every.
All not available people are orange.
It can be concluded that Teresa is every once knowing that Kimberly is rare or Teresa is available.
Someone who is glorious or not every is always orange and not rare.
Someone being both not hypocritical and every is equivalent to being glorious.
If all people are not glorious or not hypocritical, then Theobold is not orange.
If there is someone who is not every, then Brent is not rare.
If there is someone who is either available or not glorious, then Teresa is not orange and Aidan is not every.
Kimberly being not orange implies that Brent is every.
Someone being every is equivalent to being orange. | Kimberly is not orange. | entailment |
Theobold is not glorious.
Kimberly is not hypocritical.
Brent is every.
Theobold is not rare.
Teresa is available.
Aidan is not available.
Miranda is not available.
Theobold is not orange.
Aidan is not every.
Kimberly is not orange.
Aidan is not orange.
Theobold is hypocritical.If there is at least one people who is both not available and not every, then Hunter is rare.
Hunter being not orange is equivalent to Teresa being every.
It can be concluded that Miranda is glorious and Theobold is rare once knowing that Kimberly is every.
All not available people are orange.
It can be concluded that Teresa is every once knowing that Kimberly is rare or Teresa is available.
Someone who is glorious or not every is always orange and not rare.
Someone being both not hypocritical and every is equivalent to being glorious.
If all people are not glorious or not hypocritical, then Theobold is not orange.
If there is someone who is not every, then Brent is not rare.
If there is someone who is either available or not glorious, then Teresa is not orange and Aidan is not every.
Kimberly being not orange implies that Brent is every.
Someone being every is equivalent to being orange. | Brent is not every. | contradiction |
Theobold is not glorious.
Kimberly is not hypocritical.
Brent is every.
Theobold is not rare.
Teresa is available.
Aidan is not available.
Miranda is not available.
Theobold is not orange.
Aidan is not every.
Kimberly is not orange.
Aidan is not orange.
Theobold is hypocritical.If there is at least one people who is both not available and not every, then Hunter is rare.
Hunter being not orange is equivalent to Teresa being every.
It can be concluded that Miranda is glorious and Theobold is rare once knowing that Kimberly is every.
All not available people are orange.
It can be concluded that Teresa is every once knowing that Kimberly is rare or Teresa is available.
Someone who is glorious or not every is always orange and not rare.
Someone being both not hypocritical and every is equivalent to being glorious.
If all people are not glorious or not hypocritical, then Theobold is not orange.
If there is someone who is not every, then Brent is not rare.
If there is someone who is either available or not glorious, then Teresa is not orange and Aidan is not every.
Kimberly being not orange implies that Brent is every.
Someone being every is equivalent to being orange. | Brent is not orange. | contradiction |
Theobold is not glorious.
Kimberly is not hypocritical.
Brent is every.
Theobold is not rare.
Teresa is available.
Aidan is not available.
Miranda is not available.
Theobold is not orange.
Aidan is not every.
Kimberly is not orange.
Aidan is not orange.
Theobold is hypocritical.If there is at least one people who is both not available and not every, then Hunter is rare.
Hunter being not orange is equivalent to Teresa being every.
It can be concluded that Miranda is glorious and Theobold is rare once knowing that Kimberly is every.
All not available people are orange.
It can be concluded that Teresa is every once knowing that Kimberly is rare or Teresa is available.
Someone who is glorious or not every is always orange and not rare.
Someone being both not hypocritical and every is equivalent to being glorious.
If all people are not glorious or not hypocritical, then Theobold is not orange.
If there is someone who is not every, then Brent is not rare.
If there is someone who is either available or not glorious, then Teresa is not orange and Aidan is not every.
Kimberly being not orange implies that Brent is every.
Someone being every is equivalent to being orange. | Brent is orange. | entailment |
Theobold is not glorious.
Kimberly is not hypocritical.
Brent is every.
Theobold is not rare.
Teresa is available.
Aidan is not available.
Miranda is not available.
Theobold is not orange.
Aidan is not every.
Kimberly is not orange.
Aidan is not orange.
Theobold is hypocritical.If there is at least one people who is both not available and not every, then Hunter is rare.
Hunter being not orange is equivalent to Teresa being every.
It can be concluded that Miranda is glorious and Theobold is rare once knowing that Kimberly is every.
All not available people are orange.
It can be concluded that Teresa is every once knowing that Kimberly is rare or Teresa is available.
Someone who is glorious or not every is always orange and not rare.
Someone being both not hypocritical and every is equivalent to being glorious.
If all people are not glorious or not hypocritical, then Theobold is not orange.
If there is someone who is not every, then Brent is not rare.
If there is someone who is either available or not glorious, then Teresa is not orange and Aidan is not every.
Kimberly being not orange implies that Brent is every.
Someone being every is equivalent to being orange. | Miranda is available. | contradiction |
Theobold is not glorious.
Kimberly is not hypocritical.
Brent is every.
Theobold is not rare.
Teresa is available.
Aidan is not available.
Miranda is not available.
Theobold is not orange.
Aidan is not every.
Kimberly is not orange.
Aidan is not orange.
Theobold is hypocritical.If there is at least one people who is both not available and not every, then Hunter is rare.
Hunter being not orange is equivalent to Teresa being every.
It can be concluded that Miranda is glorious and Theobold is rare once knowing that Kimberly is every.
All not available people are orange.
It can be concluded that Teresa is every once knowing that Kimberly is rare or Teresa is available.
Someone who is glorious or not every is always orange and not rare.
Someone being both not hypocritical and every is equivalent to being glorious.
If all people are not glorious or not hypocritical, then Theobold is not orange.
If there is someone who is not every, then Brent is not rare.
If there is someone who is either available or not glorious, then Teresa is not orange and Aidan is not every.
Kimberly being not orange implies that Brent is every.
Someone being every is equivalent to being orange. | Theobold is not rare. | entailment |
Theobold is not glorious.
Kimberly is not hypocritical.
Brent is every.
Theobold is not rare.
Teresa is available.
Aidan is not available.
Miranda is not available.
Theobold is not orange.
Aidan is not every.
Kimberly is not orange.
Aidan is not orange.
Theobold is hypocritical.If there is at least one people who is both not available and not every, then Hunter is rare.
Hunter being not orange is equivalent to Teresa being every.
It can be concluded that Miranda is glorious and Theobold is rare once knowing that Kimberly is every.
All not available people are orange.
It can be concluded that Teresa is every once knowing that Kimberly is rare or Teresa is available.
Someone who is glorious or not every is always orange and not rare.
Someone being both not hypocritical and every is equivalent to being glorious.
If all people are not glorious or not hypocritical, then Theobold is not orange.
If there is someone who is not every, then Brent is not rare.
If there is someone who is either available or not glorious, then Teresa is not orange and Aidan is not every.
Kimberly being not orange implies that Brent is every.
Someone being every is equivalent to being orange. | Aidan is not every. | self_contradiction |
Theobold is not glorious.
Kimberly is not hypocritical.
Brent is every.
Theobold is not rare.
Teresa is available.
Aidan is not available.
Miranda is not available.
Theobold is not orange.
Aidan is not every.
Kimberly is not orange.
Aidan is not orange.
Theobold is hypocritical.If there is at least one people who is both not available and not every, then Hunter is rare.
Hunter being not orange is equivalent to Teresa being every.
It can be concluded that Miranda is glorious and Theobold is rare once knowing that Kimberly is every.
All not available people are orange.
It can be concluded that Teresa is every once knowing that Kimberly is rare or Teresa is available.
Someone who is glorious or not every is always orange and not rare.
Someone being both not hypocritical and every is equivalent to being glorious.
If all people are not glorious or not hypocritical, then Theobold is not orange.
If there is someone who is not every, then Brent is not rare.
If there is someone who is either available or not glorious, then Teresa is not orange and Aidan is not every.
Kimberly being not orange implies that Brent is every.
Someone being every is equivalent to being orange. | Aidan is every. | self_contradiction |
Theobold is not glorious.
Kimberly is not hypocritical.
Brent is every.
Theobold is not rare.
Teresa is available.
Aidan is not available.
Miranda is not available.
Theobold is not orange.
Aidan is not every.
Kimberly is not orange.
Aidan is not orange.
Theobold is hypocritical.If there is at least one people who is both not available and not every, then Hunter is rare.
Hunter being not orange is equivalent to Teresa being every.
It can be concluded that Miranda is glorious and Theobold is rare once knowing that Kimberly is every.
All not available people are orange.
It can be concluded that Teresa is every once knowing that Kimberly is rare or Teresa is available.
Someone who is glorious or not every is always orange and not rare.
Someone being both not hypocritical and every is equivalent to being glorious.
If all people are not glorious or not hypocritical, then Theobold is not orange.
If there is someone who is not every, then Brent is not rare.
If there is someone who is either available or not glorious, then Teresa is not orange and Aidan is not every.
Kimberly being not orange implies that Brent is every.
Someone being every is equivalent to being orange. | Theobold is not available. | neutral |
Theobold is not glorious.
Kimberly is not hypocritical.
Brent is every.
Theobold is not rare.
Teresa is available.
Aidan is not available.
Miranda is not available.
Theobold is not orange.
Aidan is not every.
Kimberly is not orange.
Aidan is not orange.
Theobold is hypocritical.If there is at least one people who is both not available and not every, then Hunter is rare.
Hunter being not orange is equivalent to Teresa being every.
It can be concluded that Miranda is glorious and Theobold is rare once knowing that Kimberly is every.
All not available people are orange.
It can be concluded that Teresa is every once knowing that Kimberly is rare or Teresa is available.
Someone who is glorious or not every is always orange and not rare.
Someone being both not hypocritical and every is equivalent to being glorious.
If all people are not glorious or not hypocritical, then Theobold is not orange.
If there is someone who is not every, then Brent is not rare.
If there is someone who is either available or not glorious, then Teresa is not orange and Aidan is not every.
Kimberly being not orange implies that Brent is every.
Someone being every is equivalent to being orange. | Kimberly is hypocritical. | contradiction |
Theobold is not glorious.
Kimberly is not hypocritical.
Brent is every.
Theobold is not rare.
Teresa is available.
Aidan is not available.
Miranda is not available.
Theobold is not orange.
Aidan is not every.
Kimberly is not orange.
Aidan is not orange.
Theobold is hypocritical.If there is at least one people who is both not available and not every, then Hunter is rare.
Hunter being not orange is equivalent to Teresa being every.
It can be concluded that Miranda is glorious and Theobold is rare once knowing that Kimberly is every.
All not available people are orange.
It can be concluded that Teresa is every once knowing that Kimberly is rare or Teresa is available.
Someone who is glorious or not every is always orange and not rare.
Someone being both not hypocritical and every is equivalent to being glorious.
If all people are not glorious or not hypocritical, then Theobold is not orange.
If there is someone who is not every, then Brent is not rare.
If there is someone who is either available or not glorious, then Teresa is not orange and Aidan is not every.
Kimberly being not orange implies that Brent is every.
Someone being every is equivalent to being orange. | Kimberly is glorious. | neutral |
Theobold is not glorious.
Kimberly is not hypocritical.
Brent is every.
Theobold is not rare.
Teresa is available.
Aidan is not available.
Miranda is not available.
Theobold is not orange.
Aidan is not every.
Kimberly is not orange.
Aidan is not orange.
Theobold is hypocritical.If there is at least one people who is both not available and not every, then Hunter is rare.
Hunter being not orange is equivalent to Teresa being every.
It can be concluded that Miranda is glorious and Theobold is rare once knowing that Kimberly is every.
All not available people are orange.
It can be concluded that Teresa is every once knowing that Kimberly is rare or Teresa is available.
Someone who is glorious or not every is always orange and not rare.
Someone being both not hypocritical and every is equivalent to being glorious.
If all people are not glorious or not hypocritical, then Theobold is not orange.
If there is someone who is not every, then Brent is not rare.
If there is someone who is either available or not glorious, then Teresa is not orange and Aidan is not every.
Kimberly being not orange implies that Brent is every.
Someone being every is equivalent to being orange. | Aidan is orange. | self_contradiction |
Theobold is not glorious.
Kimberly is not hypocritical.
Brent is every.
Theobold is not rare.
Teresa is available.
Aidan is not available.
Miranda is not available.
Theobold is not orange.
Aidan is not every.
Kimberly is not orange.
Aidan is not orange.
Theobold is hypocritical.If there is at least one people who is both not available and not every, then Hunter is rare.
Hunter being not orange is equivalent to Teresa being every.
It can be concluded that Miranda is glorious and Theobold is rare once knowing that Kimberly is every.
All not available people are orange.
It can be concluded that Teresa is every once knowing that Kimberly is rare or Teresa is available.
Someone who is glorious or not every is always orange and not rare.
Someone being both not hypocritical and every is equivalent to being glorious.
If all people are not glorious or not hypocritical, then Theobold is not orange.
If there is someone who is not every, then Brent is not rare.
If there is someone who is either available or not glorious, then Teresa is not orange and Aidan is not every.
Kimberly being not orange implies that Brent is every.
Someone being every is equivalent to being orange. | Teresa is not orange. | self_contradiction |
Theobold is not glorious.
Kimberly is not hypocritical.
Brent is every.
Theobold is not rare.
Teresa is available.
Aidan is not available.
Miranda is not available.
Theobold is not orange.
Aidan is not every.
Kimberly is not orange.
Aidan is not orange.
Theobold is hypocritical.If there is at least one people who is both not available and not every, then Hunter is rare.
Hunter being not orange is equivalent to Teresa being every.
It can be concluded that Miranda is glorious and Theobold is rare once knowing that Kimberly is every.
All not available people are orange.
It can be concluded that Teresa is every once knowing that Kimberly is rare or Teresa is available.
Someone who is glorious or not every is always orange and not rare.
Someone being both not hypocritical and every is equivalent to being glorious.
If all people are not glorious or not hypocritical, then Theobold is not orange.
If there is someone who is not every, then Brent is not rare.
If there is someone who is either available or not glorious, then Teresa is not orange and Aidan is not every.
Kimberly being not orange implies that Brent is every.
Someone being every is equivalent to being orange. | Teresa is orange. | self_contradiction |
Theobold is not glorious.
Kimberly is not hypocritical.
Brent is every.
Theobold is not rare.
Teresa is available.
Aidan is not available.
Miranda is not available.
Theobold is not orange.
Aidan is not every.
Kimberly is not orange.
Aidan is not orange.
Theobold is hypocritical.If there is at least one people who is both not available and not every, then Hunter is rare.
Hunter being not orange is equivalent to Teresa being every.
It can be concluded that Miranda is glorious and Theobold is rare once knowing that Kimberly is every.
All not available people are orange.
It can be concluded that Teresa is every once knowing that Kimberly is rare or Teresa is available.
Someone who is glorious or not every is always orange and not rare.
Someone being both not hypocritical and every is equivalent to being glorious.
If all people are not glorious or not hypocritical, then Theobold is not orange.
If there is someone who is not every, then Brent is not rare.
If there is someone who is either available or not glorious, then Teresa is not orange and Aidan is not every.
Kimberly being not orange implies that Brent is every.
Someone being every is equivalent to being orange. | Theobold is orange. | contradiction |
Theobold is not glorious.
Kimberly is not hypocritical.
Brent is every.
Theobold is not rare.
Teresa is available.
Aidan is not available.
Miranda is not available.
Theobold is not orange.
Aidan is not every.
Kimberly is not orange.
Aidan is not orange.
Theobold is hypocritical.If there is at least one people who is both not available and not every, then Hunter is rare.
Hunter being not orange is equivalent to Teresa being every.
It can be concluded that Miranda is glorious and Theobold is rare once knowing that Kimberly is every.
All not available people are orange.
It can be concluded that Teresa is every once knowing that Kimberly is rare or Teresa is available.
Someone who is glorious or not every is always orange and not rare.
Someone being both not hypocritical and every is equivalent to being glorious.
If all people are not glorious or not hypocritical, then Theobold is not orange.
If there is someone who is not every, then Brent is not rare.
If there is someone who is either available or not glorious, then Teresa is not orange and Aidan is not every.
Kimberly being not orange implies that Brent is every.
Someone being every is equivalent to being orange. | Brent is every. | entailment |
Theobold is not glorious.
Kimberly is not hypocritical.
Brent is every.
Theobold is not rare.
Teresa is available.
Aidan is not available.
Miranda is not available.
Theobold is not orange.
Aidan is not every.
Kimberly is not orange.
Aidan is not orange.
Theobold is hypocritical.If there is at least one people who is both not available and not every, then Hunter is rare.
Hunter being not orange is equivalent to Teresa being every.
It can be concluded that Miranda is glorious and Theobold is rare once knowing that Kimberly is every.
All not available people are orange.
It can be concluded that Teresa is every once knowing that Kimberly is rare or Teresa is available.
Someone who is glorious or not every is always orange and not rare.
Someone being both not hypocritical and every is equivalent to being glorious.
If all people are not glorious or not hypocritical, then Theobold is not orange.
If there is someone who is not every, then Brent is not rare.
If there is someone who is either available or not glorious, then Teresa is not orange and Aidan is not every.
Kimberly being not orange implies that Brent is every.
Someone being every is equivalent to being orange. | Kimberly is every. | neutral |
Culver is not helpful.
Murray is tidy.
Lane is not tidy.
Luisa is not mellow.
Luisa is large.
Kirk is mellow.
Lane is not fantastic.
Ian is not fantastic.
Luisa is unsightly.
Kirk is large.
Lane is not mellow.
Luisa is not fantastic.If Kirk is not tidy and Ian is not large, then Luisa is not mellow.
If Culver is not mellow, then Culver is tidy and Kirk is not large, and vice versa.
If Ian is large, then Sean is fantastic, and vice versa.
If Culver is not fantastic or Kirk is unsightly, then Sean is large.
If someone is mellow or he is fantastic, then he is tidy.
If someone is helpful and mellow, then he is both tidy and not unsightly, and vice versa.
If someone is not tidy, then he is both mellow and helpful.
Someone is fantastic and helpful if and only if he is large.
If someone is not large or he is unsightly, then he is mellow.
If Sean is not helpful, then Sean is tidy and Luisa is fantastic, and vice versa.
If Sean is not mellow, then Sean is large, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not fantastic or large, then Culver is tidy. | Luisa is not helpful. | contradiction |
Culver is not helpful.
Murray is tidy.
Lane is not tidy.
Luisa is not mellow.
Luisa is large.
Kirk is mellow.
Lane is not fantastic.
Ian is not fantastic.
Luisa is unsightly.
Kirk is large.
Lane is not mellow.
Luisa is not fantastic.If Kirk is not tidy and Ian is not large, then Luisa is not mellow.
If Culver is not mellow, then Culver is tidy and Kirk is not large, and vice versa.
If Ian is large, then Sean is fantastic, and vice versa.
If Culver is not fantastic or Kirk is unsightly, then Sean is large.
If someone is mellow or he is fantastic, then he is tidy.
If someone is helpful and mellow, then he is both tidy and not unsightly, and vice versa.
If someone is not tidy, then he is both mellow and helpful.
Someone is fantastic and helpful if and only if he is large.
If someone is not large or he is unsightly, then he is mellow.
If Sean is not helpful, then Sean is tidy and Luisa is fantastic, and vice versa.
If Sean is not mellow, then Sean is large, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not fantastic or large, then Culver is tidy. | Ian is mellow. | neutral |
Culver is not helpful.
Murray is tidy.
Lane is not tidy.
Luisa is not mellow.
Luisa is large.
Kirk is mellow.
Lane is not fantastic.
Ian is not fantastic.
Luisa is unsightly.
Kirk is large.
Lane is not mellow.
Luisa is not fantastic.If Kirk is not tidy and Ian is not large, then Luisa is not mellow.
If Culver is not mellow, then Culver is tidy and Kirk is not large, and vice versa.
If Ian is large, then Sean is fantastic, and vice versa.
If Culver is not fantastic or Kirk is unsightly, then Sean is large.
If someone is mellow or he is fantastic, then he is tidy.
If someone is helpful and mellow, then he is both tidy and not unsightly, and vice versa.
If someone is not tidy, then he is both mellow and helpful.
Someone is fantastic and helpful if and only if he is large.
If someone is not large or he is unsightly, then he is mellow.
If Sean is not helpful, then Sean is tidy and Luisa is fantastic, and vice versa.
If Sean is not mellow, then Sean is large, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not fantastic or large, then Culver is tidy. | Culver is not tidy. | contradiction |
Culver is not helpful.
Murray is tidy.
Lane is not tidy.
Luisa is not mellow.
Luisa is large.
Kirk is mellow.
Lane is not fantastic.
Ian is not fantastic.
Luisa is unsightly.
Kirk is large.
Lane is not mellow.
Luisa is not fantastic.If Kirk is not tidy and Ian is not large, then Luisa is not mellow.
If Culver is not mellow, then Culver is tidy and Kirk is not large, and vice versa.
If Ian is large, then Sean is fantastic, and vice versa.
If Culver is not fantastic or Kirk is unsightly, then Sean is large.
If someone is mellow or he is fantastic, then he is tidy.
If someone is helpful and mellow, then he is both tidy and not unsightly, and vice versa.
If someone is not tidy, then he is both mellow and helpful.
Someone is fantastic and helpful if and only if he is large.
If someone is not large or he is unsightly, then he is mellow.
If Sean is not helpful, then Sean is tidy and Luisa is fantastic, and vice versa.
If Sean is not mellow, then Sean is large, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not fantastic or large, then Culver is tidy. | Luisa is fantastic. | self_contradiction |
Culver is not helpful.
Murray is tidy.
Lane is not tidy.
Luisa is not mellow.
Luisa is large.
Kirk is mellow.
Lane is not fantastic.
Ian is not fantastic.
Luisa is unsightly.
Kirk is large.
Lane is not mellow.
Luisa is not fantastic.If Kirk is not tidy and Ian is not large, then Luisa is not mellow.
If Culver is not mellow, then Culver is tidy and Kirk is not large, and vice versa.
If Ian is large, then Sean is fantastic, and vice versa.
If Culver is not fantastic or Kirk is unsightly, then Sean is large.
If someone is mellow or he is fantastic, then he is tidy.
If someone is helpful and mellow, then he is both tidy and not unsightly, and vice versa.
If someone is not tidy, then he is both mellow and helpful.
Someone is fantastic and helpful if and only if he is large.
If someone is not large or he is unsightly, then he is mellow.
If Sean is not helpful, then Sean is tidy and Luisa is fantastic, and vice versa.
If Sean is not mellow, then Sean is large, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not fantastic or large, then Culver is tidy. | Lane is not mellow. | self_contradiction |
Culver is not helpful.
Murray is tidy.
Lane is not tidy.
Luisa is not mellow.
Luisa is large.
Kirk is mellow.
Lane is not fantastic.
Ian is not fantastic.
Luisa is unsightly.
Kirk is large.
Lane is not mellow.
Luisa is not fantastic.If Kirk is not tidy and Ian is not large, then Luisa is not mellow.
If Culver is not mellow, then Culver is tidy and Kirk is not large, and vice versa.
If Ian is large, then Sean is fantastic, and vice versa.
If Culver is not fantastic or Kirk is unsightly, then Sean is large.
If someone is mellow or he is fantastic, then he is tidy.
If someone is helpful and mellow, then he is both tidy and not unsightly, and vice versa.
If someone is not tidy, then he is both mellow and helpful.
Someone is fantastic and helpful if and only if he is large.
If someone is not large or he is unsightly, then he is mellow.
If Sean is not helpful, then Sean is tidy and Luisa is fantastic, and vice versa.
If Sean is not mellow, then Sean is large, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not fantastic or large, then Culver is tidy. | Kirk is not unsightly. | entailment |
Culver is not helpful.
Murray is tidy.
Lane is not tidy.
Luisa is not mellow.
Luisa is large.
Kirk is mellow.
Lane is not fantastic.
Ian is not fantastic.
Luisa is unsightly.
Kirk is large.
Lane is not mellow.
Luisa is not fantastic.If Kirk is not tidy and Ian is not large, then Luisa is not mellow.
If Culver is not mellow, then Culver is tidy and Kirk is not large, and vice versa.
If Ian is large, then Sean is fantastic, and vice versa.
If Culver is not fantastic or Kirk is unsightly, then Sean is large.
If someone is mellow or he is fantastic, then he is tidy.
If someone is helpful and mellow, then he is both tidy and not unsightly, and vice versa.
If someone is not tidy, then he is both mellow and helpful.
Someone is fantastic and helpful if and only if he is large.
If someone is not large or he is unsightly, then he is mellow.
If Sean is not helpful, then Sean is tidy and Luisa is fantastic, and vice versa.
If Sean is not mellow, then Sean is large, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not fantastic or large, then Culver is tidy. | Luisa is not tidy. | contradiction |
Culver is not helpful.
Murray is tidy.
Lane is not tidy.
Luisa is not mellow.
Luisa is large.
Kirk is mellow.
Lane is not fantastic.
Ian is not fantastic.
Luisa is unsightly.
Kirk is large.
Lane is not mellow.
Luisa is not fantastic.If Kirk is not tidy and Ian is not large, then Luisa is not mellow.
If Culver is not mellow, then Culver is tidy and Kirk is not large, and vice versa.
If Ian is large, then Sean is fantastic, and vice versa.
If Culver is not fantastic or Kirk is unsightly, then Sean is large.
If someone is mellow or he is fantastic, then he is tidy.
If someone is helpful and mellow, then he is both tidy and not unsightly, and vice versa.
If someone is not tidy, then he is both mellow and helpful.
Someone is fantastic and helpful if and only if he is large.
If someone is not large or he is unsightly, then he is mellow.
If Sean is not helpful, then Sean is tidy and Luisa is fantastic, and vice versa.
If Sean is not mellow, then Sean is large, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not fantastic or large, then Culver is tidy. | Culver is not large. | neutral |
Culver is not helpful.
Murray is tidy.
Lane is not tidy.
Luisa is not mellow.
Luisa is large.
Kirk is mellow.
Lane is not fantastic.
Ian is not fantastic.
Luisa is unsightly.
Kirk is large.
Lane is not mellow.
Luisa is not fantastic.If Kirk is not tidy and Ian is not large, then Luisa is not mellow.
If Culver is not mellow, then Culver is tidy and Kirk is not large, and vice versa.
If Ian is large, then Sean is fantastic, and vice versa.
If Culver is not fantastic or Kirk is unsightly, then Sean is large.
If someone is mellow or he is fantastic, then he is tidy.
If someone is helpful and mellow, then he is both tidy and not unsightly, and vice versa.
If someone is not tidy, then he is both mellow and helpful.
Someone is fantastic and helpful if and only if he is large.
If someone is not large or he is unsightly, then he is mellow.
If Sean is not helpful, then Sean is tidy and Luisa is fantastic, and vice versa.
If Sean is not mellow, then Sean is large, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not fantastic or large, then Culver is tidy. | Luisa is tidy. | entailment |
Culver is not helpful.
Murray is tidy.
Lane is not tidy.
Luisa is not mellow.
Luisa is large.
Kirk is mellow.
Lane is not fantastic.
Ian is not fantastic.
Luisa is unsightly.
Kirk is large.
Lane is not mellow.
Luisa is not fantastic.If Kirk is not tidy and Ian is not large, then Luisa is not mellow.
If Culver is not mellow, then Culver is tidy and Kirk is not large, and vice versa.
If Ian is large, then Sean is fantastic, and vice versa.
If Culver is not fantastic or Kirk is unsightly, then Sean is large.
If someone is mellow or he is fantastic, then he is tidy.
If someone is helpful and mellow, then he is both tidy and not unsightly, and vice versa.
If someone is not tidy, then he is both mellow and helpful.
Someone is fantastic and helpful if and only if he is large.
If someone is not large or he is unsightly, then he is mellow.
If Sean is not helpful, then Sean is tidy and Luisa is fantastic, and vice versa.
If Sean is not mellow, then Sean is large, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not fantastic or large, then Culver is tidy. | Murray is mellow. | neutral |
Culver is not helpful.
Murray is tidy.
Lane is not tidy.
Luisa is not mellow.
Luisa is large.
Kirk is mellow.
Lane is not fantastic.
Ian is not fantastic.
Luisa is unsightly.
Kirk is large.
Lane is not mellow.
Luisa is not fantastic.If Kirk is not tidy and Ian is not large, then Luisa is not mellow.
If Culver is not mellow, then Culver is tidy and Kirk is not large, and vice versa.
If Ian is large, then Sean is fantastic, and vice versa.
If Culver is not fantastic or Kirk is unsightly, then Sean is large.
If someone is mellow or he is fantastic, then he is tidy.
If someone is helpful and mellow, then he is both tidy and not unsightly, and vice versa.
If someone is not tidy, then he is both mellow and helpful.
Someone is fantastic and helpful if and only if he is large.
If someone is not large or he is unsightly, then he is mellow.
If Sean is not helpful, then Sean is tidy and Luisa is fantastic, and vice versa.
If Sean is not mellow, then Sean is large, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not fantastic or large, then Culver is tidy. | Luisa is mellow. | self_contradiction |
Culver is not helpful.
Murray is tidy.
Lane is not tidy.
Luisa is not mellow.
Luisa is large.
Kirk is mellow.
Lane is not fantastic.
Ian is not fantastic.
Luisa is unsightly.
Kirk is large.
Lane is not mellow.
Luisa is not fantastic.If Kirk is not tidy and Ian is not large, then Luisa is not mellow.
If Culver is not mellow, then Culver is tidy and Kirk is not large, and vice versa.
If Ian is large, then Sean is fantastic, and vice versa.
If Culver is not fantastic or Kirk is unsightly, then Sean is large.
If someone is mellow or he is fantastic, then he is tidy.
If someone is helpful and mellow, then he is both tidy and not unsightly, and vice versa.
If someone is not tidy, then he is both mellow and helpful.
Someone is fantastic and helpful if and only if he is large.
If someone is not large or he is unsightly, then he is mellow.
If Sean is not helpful, then Sean is tidy and Luisa is fantastic, and vice versa.
If Sean is not mellow, then Sean is large, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not fantastic or large, then Culver is tidy. | Lane is mellow. | self_contradiction |
Culver is not helpful.
Murray is tidy.
Lane is not tidy.
Luisa is not mellow.
Luisa is large.
Kirk is mellow.
Lane is not fantastic.
Ian is not fantastic.
Luisa is unsightly.
Kirk is large.
Lane is not mellow.
Luisa is not fantastic.If Kirk is not tidy and Ian is not large, then Luisa is not mellow.
If Culver is not mellow, then Culver is tidy and Kirk is not large, and vice versa.
If Ian is large, then Sean is fantastic, and vice versa.
If Culver is not fantastic or Kirk is unsightly, then Sean is large.
If someone is mellow or he is fantastic, then he is tidy.
If someone is helpful and mellow, then he is both tidy and not unsightly, and vice versa.
If someone is not tidy, then he is both mellow and helpful.
Someone is fantastic and helpful if and only if he is large.
If someone is not large or he is unsightly, then he is mellow.
If Sean is not helpful, then Sean is tidy and Luisa is fantastic, and vice versa.
If Sean is not mellow, then Sean is large, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not fantastic or large, then Culver is tidy. | Sean is not unsightly. | neutral |
Culver is not helpful.
Murray is tidy.
Lane is not tidy.
Luisa is not mellow.
Luisa is large.
Kirk is mellow.
Lane is not fantastic.
Ian is not fantastic.
Luisa is unsightly.
Kirk is large.
Lane is not mellow.
Luisa is not fantastic.If Kirk is not tidy and Ian is not large, then Luisa is not mellow.
If Culver is not mellow, then Culver is tidy and Kirk is not large, and vice versa.
If Ian is large, then Sean is fantastic, and vice versa.
If Culver is not fantastic or Kirk is unsightly, then Sean is large.
If someone is mellow or he is fantastic, then he is tidy.
If someone is helpful and mellow, then he is both tidy and not unsightly, and vice versa.
If someone is not tidy, then he is both mellow and helpful.
Someone is fantastic and helpful if and only if he is large.
If someone is not large or he is unsightly, then he is mellow.
If Sean is not helpful, then Sean is tidy and Luisa is fantastic, and vice versa.
If Sean is not mellow, then Sean is large, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not fantastic or large, then Culver is tidy. | Ian is not fantastic. | entailment |
Culver is not helpful.
Murray is tidy.
Lane is not tidy.
Luisa is not mellow.
Luisa is large.
Kirk is mellow.
Lane is not fantastic.
Ian is not fantastic.
Luisa is unsightly.
Kirk is large.
Lane is not mellow.
Luisa is not fantastic.If Kirk is not tidy and Ian is not large, then Luisa is not mellow.
If Culver is not mellow, then Culver is tidy and Kirk is not large, and vice versa.
If Ian is large, then Sean is fantastic, and vice versa.
If Culver is not fantastic or Kirk is unsightly, then Sean is large.
If someone is mellow or he is fantastic, then he is tidy.
If someone is helpful and mellow, then he is both tidy and not unsightly, and vice versa.
If someone is not tidy, then he is both mellow and helpful.
Someone is fantastic and helpful if and only if he is large.
If someone is not large or he is unsightly, then he is mellow.
If Sean is not helpful, then Sean is tidy and Luisa is fantastic, and vice versa.
If Sean is not mellow, then Sean is large, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not fantastic or large, then Culver is tidy. | Lane is helpful. | entailment |
Culver is not helpful.
Murray is tidy.
Lane is not tidy.
Luisa is not mellow.
Luisa is large.
Kirk is mellow.
Lane is not fantastic.
Ian is not fantastic.
Luisa is unsightly.
Kirk is large.
Lane is not mellow.
Luisa is not fantastic.If Kirk is not tidy and Ian is not large, then Luisa is not mellow.
If Culver is not mellow, then Culver is tidy and Kirk is not large, and vice versa.
If Ian is large, then Sean is fantastic, and vice versa.
If Culver is not fantastic or Kirk is unsightly, then Sean is large.
If someone is mellow or he is fantastic, then he is tidy.
If someone is helpful and mellow, then he is both tidy and not unsightly, and vice versa.
If someone is not tidy, then he is both mellow and helpful.
Someone is fantastic and helpful if and only if he is large.
If someone is not large or he is unsightly, then he is mellow.
If Sean is not helpful, then Sean is tidy and Luisa is fantastic, and vice versa.
If Sean is not mellow, then Sean is large, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not fantastic or large, then Culver is tidy. | Luisa is not mellow. | self_contradiction |
Culver is not helpful.
Murray is tidy.
Lane is not tidy.
Luisa is not mellow.
Luisa is large.
Kirk is mellow.
Lane is not fantastic.
Ian is not fantastic.
Luisa is unsightly.
Kirk is large.
Lane is not mellow.
Luisa is not fantastic.If Kirk is not tidy and Ian is not large, then Luisa is not mellow.
If Culver is not mellow, then Culver is tidy and Kirk is not large, and vice versa.
If Ian is large, then Sean is fantastic, and vice versa.
If Culver is not fantastic or Kirk is unsightly, then Sean is large.
If someone is mellow or he is fantastic, then he is tidy.
If someone is helpful and mellow, then he is both tidy and not unsightly, and vice versa.
If someone is not tidy, then he is both mellow and helpful.
Someone is fantastic and helpful if and only if he is large.
If someone is not large or he is unsightly, then he is mellow.
If Sean is not helpful, then Sean is tidy and Luisa is fantastic, and vice versa.
If Sean is not mellow, then Sean is large, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not fantastic or large, then Culver is tidy. | Culver is tidy. | entailment |
Culver is not helpful.
Murray is tidy.
Lane is not tidy.
Luisa is not mellow.
Luisa is large.
Kirk is mellow.
Lane is not fantastic.
Ian is not fantastic.
Luisa is unsightly.
Kirk is large.
Lane is not mellow.
Luisa is not fantastic.If Kirk is not tidy and Ian is not large, then Luisa is not mellow.
If Culver is not mellow, then Culver is tidy and Kirk is not large, and vice versa.
If Ian is large, then Sean is fantastic, and vice versa.
If Culver is not fantastic or Kirk is unsightly, then Sean is large.
If someone is mellow or he is fantastic, then he is tidy.
If someone is helpful and mellow, then he is both tidy and not unsightly, and vice versa.
If someone is not tidy, then he is both mellow and helpful.
Someone is fantastic and helpful if and only if he is large.
If someone is not large or he is unsightly, then he is mellow.
If Sean is not helpful, then Sean is tidy and Luisa is fantastic, and vice versa.
If Sean is not mellow, then Sean is large, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not fantastic or large, then Culver is tidy. | Sean is large. | neutral |
Culver is not helpful.
Murray is tidy.
Lane is not tidy.
Luisa is not mellow.
Luisa is large.
Kirk is mellow.
Lane is not fantastic.
Ian is not fantastic.
Luisa is unsightly.
Kirk is large.
Lane is not mellow.
Luisa is not fantastic.If Kirk is not tidy and Ian is not large, then Luisa is not mellow.
If Culver is not mellow, then Culver is tidy and Kirk is not large, and vice versa.
If Ian is large, then Sean is fantastic, and vice versa.
If Culver is not fantastic or Kirk is unsightly, then Sean is large.
If someone is mellow or he is fantastic, then he is tidy.
If someone is helpful and mellow, then he is both tidy and not unsightly, and vice versa.
If someone is not tidy, then he is both mellow and helpful.
Someone is fantastic and helpful if and only if he is large.
If someone is not large or he is unsightly, then he is mellow.
If Sean is not helpful, then Sean is tidy and Luisa is fantastic, and vice versa.
If Sean is not mellow, then Sean is large, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not fantastic or large, then Culver is tidy. | Kirk is not large. | contradiction |
Culver is not helpful.
Murray is tidy.
Lane is not tidy.
Luisa is not mellow.
Luisa is large.
Kirk is mellow.
Lane is not fantastic.
Ian is not fantastic.
Luisa is unsightly.
Kirk is large.
Lane is not mellow.
Luisa is not fantastic.If Kirk is not tidy and Ian is not large, then Luisa is not mellow.
If Culver is not mellow, then Culver is tidy and Kirk is not large, and vice versa.
If Ian is large, then Sean is fantastic, and vice versa.
If Culver is not fantastic or Kirk is unsightly, then Sean is large.
If someone is mellow or he is fantastic, then he is tidy.
If someone is helpful and mellow, then he is both tidy and not unsightly, and vice versa.
If someone is not tidy, then he is both mellow and helpful.
Someone is fantastic and helpful if and only if he is large.
If someone is not large or he is unsightly, then he is mellow.
If Sean is not helpful, then Sean is tidy and Luisa is fantastic, and vice versa.
If Sean is not mellow, then Sean is large, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not fantastic or large, then Culver is tidy. | Culver is helpful. | contradiction |
Phoebe is not intelligent.
Phoebe is not defeated.
Kiefer is not defeated.
Benton is not quiet.
Benton is not defeated.
Gemma is adventurous.
Trevor is not intelligent.
Phoebe is not adventurous.
Kiefer is fuzzy.
Gemma is fuzzy.
Thomas is defeated.
Thomas is adventurous.Someone is intelligent and defeated if and only if he is quiet and fuzzy.
Someone is not fuzzy and not quiet if and only if he is not defeated.
If someone is not fuzzy and intelligent, then he is both clever and adventurous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both quiet and intelligent, then Kiefer is fuzzy.
All quiet people are not adventurous.
If someone is fuzzy, then he is clever.
If there is at least one people who is both intelligent and fuzzy, then Mark is not quiet.
If everyone is not quiet or defeated, then Phoebe is not clever.
If there is someone who is either not fuzzy or not clever, then Gemma is not quiet.
Someone is not defeated and not fuzzy if and only if he is not clever.
If there is at least one people who is not defeated, then Phoebe is not fuzzy.
If Trevor is not defeated, then Benton is clever and Mark is not adventurous. | Thomas is quiet. | neutral |
Phoebe is not intelligent.
Phoebe is not defeated.
Kiefer is not defeated.
Benton is not quiet.
Benton is not defeated.
Gemma is adventurous.
Trevor is not intelligent.
Phoebe is not adventurous.
Kiefer is fuzzy.
Gemma is fuzzy.
Thomas is defeated.
Thomas is adventurous.Someone is intelligent and defeated if and only if he is quiet and fuzzy.
Someone is not fuzzy and not quiet if and only if he is not defeated.
If someone is not fuzzy and intelligent, then he is both clever and adventurous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both quiet and intelligent, then Kiefer is fuzzy.
All quiet people are not adventurous.
If someone is fuzzy, then he is clever.
If there is at least one people who is both intelligent and fuzzy, then Mark is not quiet.
If everyone is not quiet or defeated, then Phoebe is not clever.
If there is someone who is either not fuzzy or not clever, then Gemma is not quiet.
Someone is not defeated and not fuzzy if and only if he is not clever.
If there is at least one people who is not defeated, then Phoebe is not fuzzy.
If Trevor is not defeated, then Benton is clever and Mark is not adventurous. | Trevor is not fuzzy. | neutral |
Phoebe is not intelligent.
Phoebe is not defeated.
Kiefer is not defeated.
Benton is not quiet.
Benton is not defeated.
Gemma is adventurous.
Trevor is not intelligent.
Phoebe is not adventurous.
Kiefer is fuzzy.
Gemma is fuzzy.
Thomas is defeated.
Thomas is adventurous.Someone is intelligent and defeated if and only if he is quiet and fuzzy.
Someone is not fuzzy and not quiet if and only if he is not defeated.
If someone is not fuzzy and intelligent, then he is both clever and adventurous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both quiet and intelligent, then Kiefer is fuzzy.
All quiet people are not adventurous.
If someone is fuzzy, then he is clever.
If there is at least one people who is both intelligent and fuzzy, then Mark is not quiet.
If everyone is not quiet or defeated, then Phoebe is not clever.
If there is someone who is either not fuzzy or not clever, then Gemma is not quiet.
Someone is not defeated and not fuzzy if and only if he is not clever.
If there is at least one people who is not defeated, then Phoebe is not fuzzy.
If Trevor is not defeated, then Benton is clever and Mark is not adventurous. | Kiefer is not clever. | self_contradiction |
Phoebe is not intelligent.
Phoebe is not defeated.
Kiefer is not defeated.
Benton is not quiet.
Benton is not defeated.
Gemma is adventurous.
Trevor is not intelligent.
Phoebe is not adventurous.
Kiefer is fuzzy.
Gemma is fuzzy.
Thomas is defeated.
Thomas is adventurous.Someone is intelligent and defeated if and only if he is quiet and fuzzy.
Someone is not fuzzy and not quiet if and only if he is not defeated.
If someone is not fuzzy and intelligent, then he is both clever and adventurous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both quiet and intelligent, then Kiefer is fuzzy.
All quiet people are not adventurous.
If someone is fuzzy, then he is clever.
If there is at least one people who is both intelligent and fuzzy, then Mark is not quiet.
If everyone is not quiet or defeated, then Phoebe is not clever.
If there is someone who is either not fuzzy or not clever, then Gemma is not quiet.
Someone is not defeated and not fuzzy if and only if he is not clever.
If there is at least one people who is not defeated, then Phoebe is not fuzzy.
If Trevor is not defeated, then Benton is clever and Mark is not adventurous. | Gemma is not quiet. | entailment |
Phoebe is not intelligent.
Phoebe is not defeated.
Kiefer is not defeated.
Benton is not quiet.
Benton is not defeated.
Gemma is adventurous.
Trevor is not intelligent.
Phoebe is not adventurous.
Kiefer is fuzzy.
Gemma is fuzzy.
Thomas is defeated.
Thomas is adventurous.Someone is intelligent and defeated if and only if he is quiet and fuzzy.
Someone is not fuzzy and not quiet if and only if he is not defeated.
If someone is not fuzzy and intelligent, then he is both clever and adventurous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both quiet and intelligent, then Kiefer is fuzzy.
All quiet people are not adventurous.
If someone is fuzzy, then he is clever.
If there is at least one people who is both intelligent and fuzzy, then Mark is not quiet.
If everyone is not quiet or defeated, then Phoebe is not clever.
If there is someone who is either not fuzzy or not clever, then Gemma is not quiet.
Someone is not defeated and not fuzzy if and only if he is not clever.
If there is at least one people who is not defeated, then Phoebe is not fuzzy.
If Trevor is not defeated, then Benton is clever and Mark is not adventurous. | Thomas is intelligent. | neutral |
Phoebe is not intelligent.
Phoebe is not defeated.
Kiefer is not defeated.
Benton is not quiet.
Benton is not defeated.
Gemma is adventurous.
Trevor is not intelligent.
Phoebe is not adventurous.
Kiefer is fuzzy.
Gemma is fuzzy.
Thomas is defeated.
Thomas is adventurous.Someone is intelligent and defeated if and only if he is quiet and fuzzy.
Someone is not fuzzy and not quiet if and only if he is not defeated.
If someone is not fuzzy and intelligent, then he is both clever and adventurous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both quiet and intelligent, then Kiefer is fuzzy.
All quiet people are not adventurous.
If someone is fuzzy, then he is clever.
If there is at least one people who is both intelligent and fuzzy, then Mark is not quiet.
If everyone is not quiet or defeated, then Phoebe is not clever.
If there is someone who is either not fuzzy or not clever, then Gemma is not quiet.
Someone is not defeated and not fuzzy if and only if he is not clever.
If there is at least one people who is not defeated, then Phoebe is not fuzzy.
If Trevor is not defeated, then Benton is clever and Mark is not adventurous. | Thomas is clever. | neutral |
Phoebe is not intelligent.
Phoebe is not defeated.
Kiefer is not defeated.
Benton is not quiet.
Benton is not defeated.
Gemma is adventurous.
Trevor is not intelligent.
Phoebe is not adventurous.
Kiefer is fuzzy.
Gemma is fuzzy.
Thomas is defeated.
Thomas is adventurous.Someone is intelligent and defeated if and only if he is quiet and fuzzy.
Someone is not fuzzy and not quiet if and only if he is not defeated.
If someone is not fuzzy and intelligent, then he is both clever and adventurous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both quiet and intelligent, then Kiefer is fuzzy.
All quiet people are not adventurous.
If someone is fuzzy, then he is clever.
If there is at least one people who is both intelligent and fuzzy, then Mark is not quiet.
If everyone is not quiet or defeated, then Phoebe is not clever.
If there is someone who is either not fuzzy or not clever, then Gemma is not quiet.
Someone is not defeated and not fuzzy if and only if he is not clever.
If there is at least one people who is not defeated, then Phoebe is not fuzzy.
If Trevor is not defeated, then Benton is clever and Mark is not adventurous. | Kiefer is not fuzzy. | self_contradiction |
Phoebe is not intelligent.
Phoebe is not defeated.
Kiefer is not defeated.
Benton is not quiet.
Benton is not defeated.
Gemma is adventurous.
Trevor is not intelligent.
Phoebe is not adventurous.
Kiefer is fuzzy.
Gemma is fuzzy.
Thomas is defeated.
Thomas is adventurous.Someone is intelligent and defeated if and only if he is quiet and fuzzy.
Someone is not fuzzy and not quiet if and only if he is not defeated.
If someone is not fuzzy and intelligent, then he is both clever and adventurous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both quiet and intelligent, then Kiefer is fuzzy.
All quiet people are not adventurous.
If someone is fuzzy, then he is clever.
If there is at least one people who is both intelligent and fuzzy, then Mark is not quiet.
If everyone is not quiet or defeated, then Phoebe is not clever.
If there is someone who is either not fuzzy or not clever, then Gemma is not quiet.
Someone is not defeated and not fuzzy if and only if he is not clever.
If there is at least one people who is not defeated, then Phoebe is not fuzzy.
If Trevor is not defeated, then Benton is clever and Mark is not adventurous. | Gemma is not clever. | self_contradiction |
Phoebe is not intelligent.
Phoebe is not defeated.
Kiefer is not defeated.
Benton is not quiet.
Benton is not defeated.
Gemma is adventurous.
Trevor is not intelligent.
Phoebe is not adventurous.
Kiefer is fuzzy.
Gemma is fuzzy.
Thomas is defeated.
Thomas is adventurous.Someone is intelligent and defeated if and only if he is quiet and fuzzy.
Someone is not fuzzy and not quiet if and only if he is not defeated.
If someone is not fuzzy and intelligent, then he is both clever and adventurous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both quiet and intelligent, then Kiefer is fuzzy.
All quiet people are not adventurous.
If someone is fuzzy, then he is clever.
If there is at least one people who is both intelligent and fuzzy, then Mark is not quiet.
If everyone is not quiet or defeated, then Phoebe is not clever.
If there is someone who is either not fuzzy or not clever, then Gemma is not quiet.
Someone is not defeated and not fuzzy if and only if he is not clever.
If there is at least one people who is not defeated, then Phoebe is not fuzzy.
If Trevor is not defeated, then Benton is clever and Mark is not adventurous. | Benton is not quiet. | entailment |
Phoebe is not intelligent.
Phoebe is not defeated.
Kiefer is not defeated.
Benton is not quiet.
Benton is not defeated.
Gemma is adventurous.
Trevor is not intelligent.
Phoebe is not adventurous.
Kiefer is fuzzy.
Gemma is fuzzy.
Thomas is defeated.
Thomas is adventurous.Someone is intelligent and defeated if and only if he is quiet and fuzzy.
Someone is not fuzzy and not quiet if and only if he is not defeated.
If someone is not fuzzy and intelligent, then he is both clever and adventurous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both quiet and intelligent, then Kiefer is fuzzy.
All quiet people are not adventurous.
If someone is fuzzy, then he is clever.
If there is at least one people who is both intelligent and fuzzy, then Mark is not quiet.
If everyone is not quiet or defeated, then Phoebe is not clever.
If there is someone who is either not fuzzy or not clever, then Gemma is not quiet.
Someone is not defeated and not fuzzy if and only if he is not clever.
If there is at least one people who is not defeated, then Phoebe is not fuzzy.
If Trevor is not defeated, then Benton is clever and Mark is not adventurous. | Mark is quiet. | contradiction |
Phoebe is not intelligent.
Phoebe is not defeated.
Kiefer is not defeated.
Benton is not quiet.
Benton is not defeated.
Gemma is adventurous.
Trevor is not intelligent.
Phoebe is not adventurous.
Kiefer is fuzzy.
Gemma is fuzzy.
Thomas is defeated.
Thomas is adventurous.Someone is intelligent and defeated if and only if he is quiet and fuzzy.
Someone is not fuzzy and not quiet if and only if he is not defeated.
If someone is not fuzzy and intelligent, then he is both clever and adventurous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both quiet and intelligent, then Kiefer is fuzzy.
All quiet people are not adventurous.
If someone is fuzzy, then he is clever.
If there is at least one people who is both intelligent and fuzzy, then Mark is not quiet.
If everyone is not quiet or defeated, then Phoebe is not clever.
If there is someone who is either not fuzzy or not clever, then Gemma is not quiet.
Someone is not defeated and not fuzzy if and only if he is not clever.
If there is at least one people who is not defeated, then Phoebe is not fuzzy.
If Trevor is not defeated, then Benton is clever and Mark is not adventurous. | Benton is quiet. | contradiction |
Phoebe is not intelligent.
Phoebe is not defeated.
Kiefer is not defeated.
Benton is not quiet.
Benton is not defeated.
Gemma is adventurous.
Trevor is not intelligent.
Phoebe is not adventurous.
Kiefer is fuzzy.
Gemma is fuzzy.
Thomas is defeated.
Thomas is adventurous.Someone is intelligent and defeated if and only if he is quiet and fuzzy.
Someone is not fuzzy and not quiet if and only if he is not defeated.
If someone is not fuzzy and intelligent, then he is both clever and adventurous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both quiet and intelligent, then Kiefer is fuzzy.
All quiet people are not adventurous.
If someone is fuzzy, then he is clever.
If there is at least one people who is both intelligent and fuzzy, then Mark is not quiet.
If everyone is not quiet or defeated, then Phoebe is not clever.
If there is someone who is either not fuzzy or not clever, then Gemma is not quiet.
Someone is not defeated and not fuzzy if and only if he is not clever.
If there is at least one people who is not defeated, then Phoebe is not fuzzy.
If Trevor is not defeated, then Benton is clever and Mark is not adventurous. | Phoebe is adventurous. | contradiction |
Phoebe is not intelligent.
Phoebe is not defeated.
Kiefer is not defeated.
Benton is not quiet.
Benton is not defeated.
Gemma is adventurous.
Trevor is not intelligent.
Phoebe is not adventurous.
Kiefer is fuzzy.
Gemma is fuzzy.
Thomas is defeated.
Thomas is adventurous.Someone is intelligent and defeated if and only if he is quiet and fuzzy.
Someone is not fuzzy and not quiet if and only if he is not defeated.
If someone is not fuzzy and intelligent, then he is both clever and adventurous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both quiet and intelligent, then Kiefer is fuzzy.
All quiet people are not adventurous.
If someone is fuzzy, then he is clever.
If there is at least one people who is both intelligent and fuzzy, then Mark is not quiet.
If everyone is not quiet or defeated, then Phoebe is not clever.
If there is someone who is either not fuzzy or not clever, then Gemma is not quiet.
Someone is not defeated and not fuzzy if and only if he is not clever.
If there is at least one people who is not defeated, then Phoebe is not fuzzy.
If Trevor is not defeated, then Benton is clever and Mark is not adventurous. | Kiefer is not defeated. | entailment |
Phoebe is not intelligent.
Phoebe is not defeated.
Kiefer is not defeated.
Benton is not quiet.
Benton is not defeated.
Gemma is adventurous.
Trevor is not intelligent.
Phoebe is not adventurous.
Kiefer is fuzzy.
Gemma is fuzzy.
Thomas is defeated.
Thomas is adventurous.Someone is intelligent and defeated if and only if he is quiet and fuzzy.
Someone is not fuzzy and not quiet if and only if he is not defeated.
If someone is not fuzzy and intelligent, then he is both clever and adventurous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both quiet and intelligent, then Kiefer is fuzzy.
All quiet people are not adventurous.
If someone is fuzzy, then he is clever.
If there is at least one people who is both intelligent and fuzzy, then Mark is not quiet.
If everyone is not quiet or defeated, then Phoebe is not clever.
If there is someone who is either not fuzzy or not clever, then Gemma is not quiet.
Someone is not defeated and not fuzzy if and only if he is not clever.
If there is at least one people who is not defeated, then Phoebe is not fuzzy.
If Trevor is not defeated, then Benton is clever and Mark is not adventurous. | Thomas is not clever. | neutral |
Phoebe is not intelligent.
Phoebe is not defeated.
Kiefer is not defeated.
Benton is not quiet.
Benton is not defeated.
Gemma is adventurous.
Trevor is not intelligent.
Phoebe is not adventurous.
Kiefer is fuzzy.
Gemma is fuzzy.
Thomas is defeated.
Thomas is adventurous.Someone is intelligent and defeated if and only if he is quiet and fuzzy.
Someone is not fuzzy and not quiet if and only if he is not defeated.
If someone is not fuzzy and intelligent, then he is both clever and adventurous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both quiet and intelligent, then Kiefer is fuzzy.
All quiet people are not adventurous.
If someone is fuzzy, then he is clever.
If there is at least one people who is both intelligent and fuzzy, then Mark is not quiet.
If everyone is not quiet or defeated, then Phoebe is not clever.
If there is someone who is either not fuzzy or not clever, then Gemma is not quiet.
Someone is not defeated and not fuzzy if and only if he is not clever.
If there is at least one people who is not defeated, then Phoebe is not fuzzy.
If Trevor is not defeated, then Benton is clever and Mark is not adventurous. | Gemma is fuzzy. | self_contradiction |
Phoebe is not intelligent.
Phoebe is not defeated.
Kiefer is not defeated.
Benton is not quiet.
Benton is not defeated.
Gemma is adventurous.
Trevor is not intelligent.
Phoebe is not adventurous.
Kiefer is fuzzy.
Gemma is fuzzy.
Thomas is defeated.
Thomas is adventurous.Someone is intelligent and defeated if and only if he is quiet and fuzzy.
Someone is not fuzzy and not quiet if and only if he is not defeated.
If someone is not fuzzy and intelligent, then he is both clever and adventurous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both quiet and intelligent, then Kiefer is fuzzy.
All quiet people are not adventurous.
If someone is fuzzy, then he is clever.
If there is at least one people who is both intelligent and fuzzy, then Mark is not quiet.
If everyone is not quiet or defeated, then Phoebe is not clever.
If there is someone who is either not fuzzy or not clever, then Gemma is not quiet.
Someone is not defeated and not fuzzy if and only if he is not clever.
If there is at least one people who is not defeated, then Phoebe is not fuzzy.
If Trevor is not defeated, then Benton is clever and Mark is not adventurous. | Phoebe is not defeated. | entailment |
Phoebe is not intelligent.
Phoebe is not defeated.
Kiefer is not defeated.
Benton is not quiet.
Benton is not defeated.
Gemma is adventurous.
Trevor is not intelligent.
Phoebe is not adventurous.
Kiefer is fuzzy.
Gemma is fuzzy.
Thomas is defeated.
Thomas is adventurous.Someone is intelligent and defeated if and only if he is quiet and fuzzy.
Someone is not fuzzy and not quiet if and only if he is not defeated.
If someone is not fuzzy and intelligent, then he is both clever and adventurous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both quiet and intelligent, then Kiefer is fuzzy.
All quiet people are not adventurous.
If someone is fuzzy, then he is clever.
If there is at least one people who is both intelligent and fuzzy, then Mark is not quiet.
If everyone is not quiet or defeated, then Phoebe is not clever.
If there is someone who is either not fuzzy or not clever, then Gemma is not quiet.
Someone is not defeated and not fuzzy if and only if he is not clever.
If there is at least one people who is not defeated, then Phoebe is not fuzzy.
If Trevor is not defeated, then Benton is clever and Mark is not adventurous. | Gemma is not fuzzy. | self_contradiction |
Phoebe is not intelligent.
Phoebe is not defeated.
Kiefer is not defeated.
Benton is not quiet.
Benton is not defeated.
Gemma is adventurous.
Trevor is not intelligent.
Phoebe is not adventurous.
Kiefer is fuzzy.
Gemma is fuzzy.
Thomas is defeated.
Thomas is adventurous.Someone is intelligent and defeated if and only if he is quiet and fuzzy.
Someone is not fuzzy and not quiet if and only if he is not defeated.
If someone is not fuzzy and intelligent, then he is both clever and adventurous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both quiet and intelligent, then Kiefer is fuzzy.
All quiet people are not adventurous.
If someone is fuzzy, then he is clever.
If there is at least one people who is both intelligent and fuzzy, then Mark is not quiet.
If everyone is not quiet or defeated, then Phoebe is not clever.
If there is someone who is either not fuzzy or not clever, then Gemma is not quiet.
Someone is not defeated and not fuzzy if and only if he is not clever.
If there is at least one people who is not defeated, then Phoebe is not fuzzy.
If Trevor is not defeated, then Benton is clever and Mark is not adventurous. | Phoebe is quiet. | contradiction |
Phoebe is not intelligent.
Phoebe is not defeated.
Kiefer is not defeated.
Benton is not quiet.
Benton is not defeated.
Gemma is adventurous.
Trevor is not intelligent.
Phoebe is not adventurous.
Kiefer is fuzzy.
Gemma is fuzzy.
Thomas is defeated.
Thomas is adventurous.Someone is intelligent and defeated if and only if he is quiet and fuzzy.
Someone is not fuzzy and not quiet if and only if he is not defeated.
If someone is not fuzzy and intelligent, then he is both clever and adventurous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both quiet and intelligent, then Kiefer is fuzzy.
All quiet people are not adventurous.
If someone is fuzzy, then he is clever.
If there is at least one people who is both intelligent and fuzzy, then Mark is not quiet.
If everyone is not quiet or defeated, then Phoebe is not clever.
If there is someone who is either not fuzzy or not clever, then Gemma is not quiet.
Someone is not defeated and not fuzzy if and only if he is not clever.
If there is at least one people who is not defeated, then Phoebe is not fuzzy.
If Trevor is not defeated, then Benton is clever and Mark is not adventurous. | Thomas is not defeated. | contradiction |
Phoebe is not intelligent.
Phoebe is not defeated.
Kiefer is not defeated.
Benton is not quiet.
Benton is not defeated.
Gemma is adventurous.
Trevor is not intelligent.
Phoebe is not adventurous.
Kiefer is fuzzy.
Gemma is fuzzy.
Thomas is defeated.
Thomas is adventurous.Someone is intelligent and defeated if and only if he is quiet and fuzzy.
Someone is not fuzzy and not quiet if and only if he is not defeated.
If someone is not fuzzy and intelligent, then he is both clever and adventurous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both quiet and intelligent, then Kiefer is fuzzy.
All quiet people are not adventurous.
If someone is fuzzy, then he is clever.
If there is at least one people who is both intelligent and fuzzy, then Mark is not quiet.
If everyone is not quiet or defeated, then Phoebe is not clever.
If there is someone who is either not fuzzy or not clever, then Gemma is not quiet.
Someone is not defeated and not fuzzy if and only if he is not clever.
If there is at least one people who is not defeated, then Phoebe is not fuzzy.
If Trevor is not defeated, then Benton is clever and Mark is not adventurous. | Trevor is not intelligent. | entailment |
Shawn is silly.
Maggie is intellectual.
Sterling is not intelligent.
Sterling is not intellectual.
Truman is silly.
Quillan is not large.
Maggie is silly.
Shawn is not attentive.
Shawn is not shiny.
Shawn is intelligent.
Maggie is attentive.
Cadman is not intellectual.Someone being not intellectual is equivalent to being silly.
If there is at least one people who is intellectual or not intelligent, then Shawn is not attentive.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not attentive once knowing that Maggie is not intelligent and Quillan is not silly.
If someone is not shiny and intellectual, then he is not attentive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both intelligent and not shiny, then Maggie is not large.
If there is someone who is not intelligent, then Burton is not silly.
Quillan being not attentive and Cadman being large imply that Truman is intellectual and Burton is not intelligent.
If someone is not intelligent and not large, then he is shiny and silly.
If Burton is silly or Shawn is not shiny, then Burton is attentive.
Someone being not shiny is equivalent to being not intellectual.
Truman being not shiny implies that Sterling is silly and Burton is large.
If there is someone who is both shiny and not large, then Truman is not attentive. | Cadman is not shiny. | entailment |
Shawn is silly.
Maggie is intellectual.
Sterling is not intelligent.
Sterling is not intellectual.
Truman is silly.
Quillan is not large.
Maggie is silly.
Shawn is not attentive.
Shawn is not shiny.
Shawn is intelligent.
Maggie is attentive.
Cadman is not intellectual.Someone being not intellectual is equivalent to being silly.
If there is at least one people who is intellectual or not intelligent, then Shawn is not attentive.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not attentive once knowing that Maggie is not intelligent and Quillan is not silly.
If someone is not shiny and intellectual, then he is not attentive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both intelligent and not shiny, then Maggie is not large.
If there is someone who is not intelligent, then Burton is not silly.
Quillan being not attentive and Cadman being large imply that Truman is intellectual and Burton is not intelligent.
If someone is not intelligent and not large, then he is shiny and silly.
If Burton is silly or Shawn is not shiny, then Burton is attentive.
Someone being not shiny is equivalent to being not intellectual.
Truman being not shiny implies that Sterling is silly and Burton is large.
If there is someone who is both shiny and not large, then Truman is not attentive. | Sterling is shiny. | contradiction |
Shawn is silly.
Maggie is intellectual.
Sterling is not intelligent.
Sterling is not intellectual.
Truman is silly.
Quillan is not large.
Maggie is silly.
Shawn is not attentive.
Shawn is not shiny.
Shawn is intelligent.
Maggie is attentive.
Cadman is not intellectual.Someone being not intellectual is equivalent to being silly.
If there is at least one people who is intellectual or not intelligent, then Shawn is not attentive.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not attentive once knowing that Maggie is not intelligent and Quillan is not silly.
If someone is not shiny and intellectual, then he is not attentive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both intelligent and not shiny, then Maggie is not large.
If there is someone who is not intelligent, then Burton is not silly.
Quillan being not attentive and Cadman being large imply that Truman is intellectual and Burton is not intelligent.
If someone is not intelligent and not large, then he is shiny and silly.
If Burton is silly or Shawn is not shiny, then Burton is attentive.
Someone being not shiny is equivalent to being not intellectual.
Truman being not shiny implies that Sterling is silly and Burton is large.
If there is someone who is both shiny and not large, then Truman is not attentive. | Maggie is not silly. | contradiction |
Shawn is silly.
Maggie is intellectual.
Sterling is not intelligent.
Sterling is not intellectual.
Truman is silly.
Quillan is not large.
Maggie is silly.
Shawn is not attentive.
Shawn is not shiny.
Shawn is intelligent.
Maggie is attentive.
Cadman is not intellectual.Someone being not intellectual is equivalent to being silly.
If there is at least one people who is intellectual or not intelligent, then Shawn is not attentive.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not attentive once knowing that Maggie is not intelligent and Quillan is not silly.
If someone is not shiny and intellectual, then he is not attentive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both intelligent and not shiny, then Maggie is not large.
If there is someone who is not intelligent, then Burton is not silly.
Quillan being not attentive and Cadman being large imply that Truman is intellectual and Burton is not intelligent.
If someone is not intelligent and not large, then he is shiny and silly.
If Burton is silly or Shawn is not shiny, then Burton is attentive.
Someone being not shiny is equivalent to being not intellectual.
Truman being not shiny implies that Sterling is silly and Burton is large.
If there is someone who is both shiny and not large, then Truman is not attentive. | Cadman is attentive. | neutral |
Shawn is silly.
Maggie is intellectual.
Sterling is not intelligent.
Sterling is not intellectual.
Truman is silly.
Quillan is not large.
Maggie is silly.
Shawn is not attentive.
Shawn is not shiny.
Shawn is intelligent.
Maggie is attentive.
Cadman is not intellectual.Someone being not intellectual is equivalent to being silly.
If there is at least one people who is intellectual or not intelligent, then Shawn is not attentive.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not attentive once knowing that Maggie is not intelligent and Quillan is not silly.
If someone is not shiny and intellectual, then he is not attentive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both intelligent and not shiny, then Maggie is not large.
If there is someone who is not intelligent, then Burton is not silly.
Quillan being not attentive and Cadman being large imply that Truman is intellectual and Burton is not intelligent.
If someone is not intelligent and not large, then he is shiny and silly.
If Burton is silly or Shawn is not shiny, then Burton is attentive.
Someone being not shiny is equivalent to being not intellectual.
Truman being not shiny implies that Sterling is silly and Burton is large.
If there is someone who is both shiny and not large, then Truman is not attentive. | Burton is not attentive. | contradiction |
Shawn is silly.
Maggie is intellectual.
Sterling is not intelligent.
Sterling is not intellectual.
Truman is silly.
Quillan is not large.
Maggie is silly.
Shawn is not attentive.
Shawn is not shiny.
Shawn is intelligent.
Maggie is attentive.
Cadman is not intellectual.Someone being not intellectual is equivalent to being silly.
If there is at least one people who is intellectual or not intelligent, then Shawn is not attentive.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not attentive once knowing that Maggie is not intelligent and Quillan is not silly.
If someone is not shiny and intellectual, then he is not attentive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both intelligent and not shiny, then Maggie is not large.
If there is someone who is not intelligent, then Burton is not silly.
Quillan being not attentive and Cadman being large imply that Truman is intellectual and Burton is not intelligent.
If someone is not intelligent and not large, then he is shiny and silly.
If Burton is silly or Shawn is not shiny, then Burton is attentive.
Someone being not shiny is equivalent to being not intellectual.
Truman being not shiny implies that Sterling is silly and Burton is large.
If there is someone who is both shiny and not large, then Truman is not attentive. | Sterling is intellectual. | contradiction |
Shawn is silly.
Maggie is intellectual.
Sterling is not intelligent.
Sterling is not intellectual.
Truman is silly.
Quillan is not large.
Maggie is silly.
Shawn is not attentive.
Shawn is not shiny.
Shawn is intelligent.
Maggie is attentive.
Cadman is not intellectual.Someone being not intellectual is equivalent to being silly.
If there is at least one people who is intellectual or not intelligent, then Shawn is not attentive.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not attentive once knowing that Maggie is not intelligent and Quillan is not silly.
If someone is not shiny and intellectual, then he is not attentive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both intelligent and not shiny, then Maggie is not large.
If there is someone who is not intelligent, then Burton is not silly.
Quillan being not attentive and Cadman being large imply that Truman is intellectual and Burton is not intelligent.
If someone is not intelligent and not large, then he is shiny and silly.
If Burton is silly or Shawn is not shiny, then Burton is attentive.
Someone being not shiny is equivalent to being not intellectual.
Truman being not shiny implies that Sterling is silly and Burton is large.
If there is someone who is both shiny and not large, then Truman is not attentive. | Cadman is not intellectual. | entailment |
Shawn is silly.
Maggie is intellectual.
Sterling is not intelligent.
Sterling is not intellectual.
Truman is silly.
Quillan is not large.
Maggie is silly.
Shawn is not attentive.
Shawn is not shiny.
Shawn is intelligent.
Maggie is attentive.
Cadman is not intellectual.Someone being not intellectual is equivalent to being silly.
If there is at least one people who is intellectual or not intelligent, then Shawn is not attentive.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not attentive once knowing that Maggie is not intelligent and Quillan is not silly.
If someone is not shiny and intellectual, then he is not attentive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both intelligent and not shiny, then Maggie is not large.
If there is someone who is not intelligent, then Burton is not silly.
Quillan being not attentive and Cadman being large imply that Truman is intellectual and Burton is not intelligent.
If someone is not intelligent and not large, then he is shiny and silly.
If Burton is silly or Shawn is not shiny, then Burton is attentive.
Someone being not shiny is equivalent to being not intellectual.
Truman being not shiny implies that Sterling is silly and Burton is large.
If there is someone who is both shiny and not large, then Truman is not attentive. | Shawn is intellectual. | self_contradiction |
Shawn is silly.
Maggie is intellectual.
Sterling is not intelligent.
Sterling is not intellectual.
Truman is silly.
Quillan is not large.
Maggie is silly.
Shawn is not attentive.
Shawn is not shiny.
Shawn is intelligent.
Maggie is attentive.
Cadman is not intellectual.Someone being not intellectual is equivalent to being silly.
If there is at least one people who is intellectual or not intelligent, then Shawn is not attentive.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not attentive once knowing that Maggie is not intelligent and Quillan is not silly.
If someone is not shiny and intellectual, then he is not attentive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both intelligent and not shiny, then Maggie is not large.
If there is someone who is not intelligent, then Burton is not silly.
Quillan being not attentive and Cadman being large imply that Truman is intellectual and Burton is not intelligent.
If someone is not intelligent and not large, then he is shiny and silly.
If Burton is silly or Shawn is not shiny, then Burton is attentive.
Someone being not shiny is equivalent to being not intellectual.
Truman being not shiny implies that Sterling is silly and Burton is large.
If there is someone who is both shiny and not large, then Truman is not attentive. | Truman is large. | neutral |
Shawn is silly.
Maggie is intellectual.
Sterling is not intelligent.
Sterling is not intellectual.
Truman is silly.
Quillan is not large.
Maggie is silly.
Shawn is not attentive.
Shawn is not shiny.
Shawn is intelligent.
Maggie is attentive.
Cadman is not intellectual.Someone being not intellectual is equivalent to being silly.
If there is at least one people who is intellectual or not intelligent, then Shawn is not attentive.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not attentive once knowing that Maggie is not intelligent and Quillan is not silly.
If someone is not shiny and intellectual, then he is not attentive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both intelligent and not shiny, then Maggie is not large.
If there is someone who is not intelligent, then Burton is not silly.
Quillan being not attentive and Cadman being large imply that Truman is intellectual and Burton is not intelligent.
If someone is not intelligent and not large, then he is shiny and silly.
If Burton is silly or Shawn is not shiny, then Burton is attentive.
Someone being not shiny is equivalent to being not intellectual.
Truman being not shiny implies that Sterling is silly and Burton is large.
If there is someone who is both shiny and not large, then Truman is not attentive. | Burton is not silly. | entailment |
Shawn is silly.
Maggie is intellectual.
Sterling is not intelligent.
Sterling is not intellectual.
Truman is silly.
Quillan is not large.
Maggie is silly.
Shawn is not attentive.
Shawn is not shiny.
Shawn is intelligent.
Maggie is attentive.
Cadman is not intellectual.Someone being not intellectual is equivalent to being silly.
If there is at least one people who is intellectual or not intelligent, then Shawn is not attentive.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not attentive once knowing that Maggie is not intelligent and Quillan is not silly.
If someone is not shiny and intellectual, then he is not attentive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both intelligent and not shiny, then Maggie is not large.
If there is someone who is not intelligent, then Burton is not silly.
Quillan being not attentive and Cadman being large imply that Truman is intellectual and Burton is not intelligent.
If someone is not intelligent and not large, then he is shiny and silly.
If Burton is silly or Shawn is not shiny, then Burton is attentive.
Someone being not shiny is equivalent to being not intellectual.
Truman being not shiny implies that Sterling is silly and Burton is large.
If there is someone who is both shiny and not large, then Truman is not attentive. | Truman is not shiny. | entailment |
Shawn is silly.
Maggie is intellectual.
Sterling is not intelligent.
Sterling is not intellectual.
Truman is silly.
Quillan is not large.
Maggie is silly.
Shawn is not attentive.
Shawn is not shiny.
Shawn is intelligent.
Maggie is attentive.
Cadman is not intellectual.Someone being not intellectual is equivalent to being silly.
If there is at least one people who is intellectual or not intelligent, then Shawn is not attentive.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not attentive once knowing that Maggie is not intelligent and Quillan is not silly.
If someone is not shiny and intellectual, then he is not attentive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both intelligent and not shiny, then Maggie is not large.
If there is someone who is not intelligent, then Burton is not silly.
Quillan being not attentive and Cadman being large imply that Truman is intellectual and Burton is not intelligent.
If someone is not intelligent and not large, then he is shiny and silly.
If Burton is silly or Shawn is not shiny, then Burton is attentive.
Someone being not shiny is equivalent to being not intellectual.
Truman being not shiny implies that Sterling is silly and Burton is large.
If there is someone who is both shiny and not large, then Truman is not attentive. | Shawn is not shiny. | entailment |
Shawn is silly.
Maggie is intellectual.
Sterling is not intelligent.
Sterling is not intellectual.
Truman is silly.
Quillan is not large.
Maggie is silly.
Shawn is not attentive.
Shawn is not shiny.
Shawn is intelligent.
Maggie is attentive.
Cadman is not intellectual.Someone being not intellectual is equivalent to being silly.
If there is at least one people who is intellectual or not intelligent, then Shawn is not attentive.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not attentive once knowing that Maggie is not intelligent and Quillan is not silly.
If someone is not shiny and intellectual, then he is not attentive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both intelligent and not shiny, then Maggie is not large.
If there is someone who is not intelligent, then Burton is not silly.
Quillan being not attentive and Cadman being large imply that Truman is intellectual and Burton is not intelligent.
If someone is not intelligent and not large, then he is shiny and silly.
If Burton is silly or Shawn is not shiny, then Burton is attentive.
Someone being not shiny is equivalent to being not intellectual.
Truman being not shiny implies that Sterling is silly and Burton is large.
If there is someone who is both shiny and not large, then Truman is not attentive. | Quillan is intellectual. | neutral |
Shawn is silly.
Maggie is intellectual.
Sterling is not intelligent.
Sterling is not intellectual.
Truman is silly.
Quillan is not large.
Maggie is silly.
Shawn is not attentive.
Shawn is not shiny.
Shawn is intelligent.
Maggie is attentive.
Cadman is not intellectual.Someone being not intellectual is equivalent to being silly.
If there is at least one people who is intellectual or not intelligent, then Shawn is not attentive.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not attentive once knowing that Maggie is not intelligent and Quillan is not silly.
If someone is not shiny and intellectual, then he is not attentive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both intelligent and not shiny, then Maggie is not large.
If there is someone who is not intelligent, then Burton is not silly.
Quillan being not attentive and Cadman being large imply that Truman is intellectual and Burton is not intelligent.
If someone is not intelligent and not large, then he is shiny and silly.
If Burton is silly or Shawn is not shiny, then Burton is attentive.
Someone being not shiny is equivalent to being not intellectual.
Truman being not shiny implies that Sterling is silly and Burton is large.
If there is someone who is both shiny and not large, then Truman is not attentive. | Maggie is not intellectual. | self_contradiction |
Shawn is silly.
Maggie is intellectual.
Sterling is not intelligent.
Sterling is not intellectual.
Truman is silly.
Quillan is not large.
Maggie is silly.
Shawn is not attentive.
Shawn is not shiny.
Shawn is intelligent.
Maggie is attentive.
Cadman is not intellectual.Someone being not intellectual is equivalent to being silly.
If there is at least one people who is intellectual or not intelligent, then Shawn is not attentive.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not attentive once knowing that Maggie is not intelligent and Quillan is not silly.
If someone is not shiny and intellectual, then he is not attentive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both intelligent and not shiny, then Maggie is not large.
If there is someone who is not intelligent, then Burton is not silly.
Quillan being not attentive and Cadman being large imply that Truman is intellectual and Burton is not intelligent.
If someone is not intelligent and not large, then he is shiny and silly.
If Burton is silly or Shawn is not shiny, then Burton is attentive.
Someone being not shiny is equivalent to being not intellectual.
Truman being not shiny implies that Sterling is silly and Burton is large.
If there is someone who is both shiny and not large, then Truman is not attentive. | Maggie is intellectual. | self_contradiction |
Shawn is silly.
Maggie is intellectual.
Sterling is not intelligent.
Sterling is not intellectual.
Truman is silly.
Quillan is not large.
Maggie is silly.
Shawn is not attentive.
Shawn is not shiny.
Shawn is intelligent.
Maggie is attentive.
Cadman is not intellectual.Someone being not intellectual is equivalent to being silly.
If there is at least one people who is intellectual or not intelligent, then Shawn is not attentive.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not attentive once knowing that Maggie is not intelligent and Quillan is not silly.
If someone is not shiny and intellectual, then he is not attentive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both intelligent and not shiny, then Maggie is not large.
If there is someone who is not intelligent, then Burton is not silly.
Quillan being not attentive and Cadman being large imply that Truman is intellectual and Burton is not intelligent.
If someone is not intelligent and not large, then he is shiny and silly.
If Burton is silly or Shawn is not shiny, then Burton is attentive.
Someone being not shiny is equivalent to being not intellectual.
Truman being not shiny implies that Sterling is silly and Burton is large.
If there is someone who is both shiny and not large, then Truman is not attentive. | Maggie is not attentive. | self_contradiction |
Shawn is silly.
Maggie is intellectual.
Sterling is not intelligent.
Sterling is not intellectual.
Truman is silly.
Quillan is not large.
Maggie is silly.
Shawn is not attentive.
Shawn is not shiny.
Shawn is intelligent.
Maggie is attentive.
Cadman is not intellectual.Someone being not intellectual is equivalent to being silly.
If there is at least one people who is intellectual or not intelligent, then Shawn is not attentive.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not attentive once knowing that Maggie is not intelligent and Quillan is not silly.
If someone is not shiny and intellectual, then he is not attentive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both intelligent and not shiny, then Maggie is not large.
If there is someone who is not intelligent, then Burton is not silly.
Quillan being not attentive and Cadman being large imply that Truman is intellectual and Burton is not intelligent.
If someone is not intelligent and not large, then he is shiny and silly.
If Burton is silly or Shawn is not shiny, then Burton is attentive.
Someone being not shiny is equivalent to being not intellectual.
Truman being not shiny implies that Sterling is silly and Burton is large.
If there is someone who is both shiny and not large, then Truman is not attentive. | Quillan is not attentive. | neutral |
Shawn is silly.
Maggie is intellectual.
Sterling is not intelligent.
Sterling is not intellectual.
Truman is silly.
Quillan is not large.
Maggie is silly.
Shawn is not attentive.
Shawn is not shiny.
Shawn is intelligent.
Maggie is attentive.
Cadman is not intellectual.Someone being not intellectual is equivalent to being silly.
If there is at least one people who is intellectual or not intelligent, then Shawn is not attentive.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not attentive once knowing that Maggie is not intelligent and Quillan is not silly.
If someone is not shiny and intellectual, then he is not attentive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both intelligent and not shiny, then Maggie is not large.
If there is someone who is not intelligent, then Burton is not silly.
Quillan being not attentive and Cadman being large imply that Truman is intellectual and Burton is not intelligent.
If someone is not intelligent and not large, then he is shiny and silly.
If Burton is silly or Shawn is not shiny, then Burton is attentive.
Someone being not shiny is equivalent to being not intellectual.
Truman being not shiny implies that Sterling is silly and Burton is large.
If there is someone who is both shiny and not large, then Truman is not attentive. | Shawn is not intellectual. | self_contradiction |
Shawn is silly.
Maggie is intellectual.
Sterling is not intelligent.
Sterling is not intellectual.
Truman is silly.
Quillan is not large.
Maggie is silly.
Shawn is not attentive.
Shawn is not shiny.
Shawn is intelligent.
Maggie is attentive.
Cadman is not intellectual.Someone being not intellectual is equivalent to being silly.
If there is at least one people who is intellectual or not intelligent, then Shawn is not attentive.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not attentive once knowing that Maggie is not intelligent and Quillan is not silly.
If someone is not shiny and intellectual, then he is not attentive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both intelligent and not shiny, then Maggie is not large.
If there is someone who is not intelligent, then Burton is not silly.
Quillan being not attentive and Cadman being large imply that Truman is intellectual and Burton is not intelligent.
If someone is not intelligent and not large, then he is shiny and silly.
If Burton is silly or Shawn is not shiny, then Burton is attentive.
Someone being not shiny is equivalent to being not intellectual.
Truman being not shiny implies that Sterling is silly and Burton is large.
If there is someone who is both shiny and not large, then Truman is not attentive. | Sterling is attentive. | neutral |
Shawn is silly.
Maggie is intellectual.
Sterling is not intelligent.
Sterling is not intellectual.
Truman is silly.
Quillan is not large.
Maggie is silly.
Shawn is not attentive.
Shawn is not shiny.
Shawn is intelligent.
Maggie is attentive.
Cadman is not intellectual.Someone being not intellectual is equivalent to being silly.
If there is at least one people who is intellectual or not intelligent, then Shawn is not attentive.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not attentive once knowing that Maggie is not intelligent and Quillan is not silly.
If someone is not shiny and intellectual, then he is not attentive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both intelligent and not shiny, then Maggie is not large.
If there is someone who is not intelligent, then Burton is not silly.
Quillan being not attentive and Cadman being large imply that Truman is intellectual and Burton is not intelligent.
If someone is not intelligent and not large, then he is shiny and silly.
If Burton is silly or Shawn is not shiny, then Burton is attentive.
Someone being not shiny is equivalent to being not intellectual.
Truman being not shiny implies that Sterling is silly and Burton is large.
If there is someone who is both shiny and not large, then Truman is not attentive. | Cadman is intellectual. | contradiction |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.