premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Burton is traditional.
Carolina is magnificent.
Jesse is not consistent.
Jesse is not entire.
Jesse is traditional.
Kerry is not magnificent.
Abraham is untidy.
Culver is untidy.
Jesse is enchanting.
Abraham is not magnificent.
Kerry is traditional.
Abraham is consistent.Someone who is entire is always both not untidy and consistent.
Burton being traditional is equivalent to Abraham being not untidy and Abraham being not enchanting.
if there is at least one people who is untidy and entire, then Culver is consistent and Burton is not enchanting.
If there is at least one people who is magnificent, then Jesse is not untidy and Jesse is entire.
Kerry being not traditional and Kerry being not untidy imply that Culver is enchanting.
If Kerry is not untidy or Brian is enchanting, then Carolina is magnificent.
Someone who is both not consistent and traditional is always not enchanting.
If Culver is not traditional, then Abraham is not entire and Kerry is consistent, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kerry is enchanting once knowing that Brian is not consistent.
If Kerry is not magnificent and Brian is entire, then Jesse is not enchanting and Brian is untidy, and vice versa.
If someone is not traditional or consistent, then he is not magnificent.
If there is at least one people who is not entire or consistent, then Jesse is untidy. | Abraham is consistent. | entailment |
Burton is traditional.
Carolina is magnificent.
Jesse is not consistent.
Jesse is not entire.
Jesse is traditional.
Kerry is not magnificent.
Abraham is untidy.
Culver is untidy.
Jesse is enchanting.
Abraham is not magnificent.
Kerry is traditional.
Abraham is consistent.Someone who is entire is always both not untidy and consistent.
Burton being traditional is equivalent to Abraham being not untidy and Abraham being not enchanting.
if there is at least one people who is untidy and entire, then Culver is consistent and Burton is not enchanting.
If there is at least one people who is magnificent, then Jesse is not untidy and Jesse is entire.
Kerry being not traditional and Kerry being not untidy imply that Culver is enchanting.
If Kerry is not untidy or Brian is enchanting, then Carolina is magnificent.
Someone who is both not consistent and traditional is always not enchanting.
If Culver is not traditional, then Abraham is not entire and Kerry is consistent, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kerry is enchanting once knowing that Brian is not consistent.
If Kerry is not magnificent and Brian is entire, then Jesse is not enchanting and Brian is untidy, and vice versa.
If someone is not traditional or consistent, then he is not magnificent.
If there is at least one people who is not entire or consistent, then Jesse is untidy. | Jesse is consistent. | self_contradiction |
Burton is traditional.
Carolina is magnificent.
Jesse is not consistent.
Jesse is not entire.
Jesse is traditional.
Kerry is not magnificent.
Abraham is untidy.
Culver is untidy.
Jesse is enchanting.
Abraham is not magnificent.
Kerry is traditional.
Abraham is consistent.Someone who is entire is always both not untidy and consistent.
Burton being traditional is equivalent to Abraham being not untidy and Abraham being not enchanting.
if there is at least one people who is untidy and entire, then Culver is consistent and Burton is not enchanting.
If there is at least one people who is magnificent, then Jesse is not untidy and Jesse is entire.
Kerry being not traditional and Kerry being not untidy imply that Culver is enchanting.
If Kerry is not untidy or Brian is enchanting, then Carolina is magnificent.
Someone who is both not consistent and traditional is always not enchanting.
If Culver is not traditional, then Abraham is not entire and Kerry is consistent, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kerry is enchanting once knowing that Brian is not consistent.
If Kerry is not magnificent and Brian is entire, then Jesse is not enchanting and Brian is untidy, and vice versa.
If someone is not traditional or consistent, then he is not magnificent.
If there is at least one people who is not entire or consistent, then Jesse is untidy. | Kerry is not entire. | neutral |
Burton is traditional.
Carolina is magnificent.
Jesse is not consistent.
Jesse is not entire.
Jesse is traditional.
Kerry is not magnificent.
Abraham is untidy.
Culver is untidy.
Jesse is enchanting.
Abraham is not magnificent.
Kerry is traditional.
Abraham is consistent.Someone who is entire is always both not untidy and consistent.
Burton being traditional is equivalent to Abraham being not untidy and Abraham being not enchanting.
if there is at least one people who is untidy and entire, then Culver is consistent and Burton is not enchanting.
If there is at least one people who is magnificent, then Jesse is not untidy and Jesse is entire.
Kerry being not traditional and Kerry being not untidy imply that Culver is enchanting.
If Kerry is not untidy or Brian is enchanting, then Carolina is magnificent.
Someone who is both not consistent and traditional is always not enchanting.
If Culver is not traditional, then Abraham is not entire and Kerry is consistent, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kerry is enchanting once knowing that Brian is not consistent.
If Kerry is not magnificent and Brian is entire, then Jesse is not enchanting and Brian is untidy, and vice versa.
If someone is not traditional or consistent, then he is not magnificent.
If there is at least one people who is not entire or consistent, then Jesse is untidy. | Jesse is not entire. | self_contradiction |
Burton is traditional.
Carolina is magnificent.
Jesse is not consistent.
Jesse is not entire.
Jesse is traditional.
Kerry is not magnificent.
Abraham is untidy.
Culver is untidy.
Jesse is enchanting.
Abraham is not magnificent.
Kerry is traditional.
Abraham is consistent.Someone who is entire is always both not untidy and consistent.
Burton being traditional is equivalent to Abraham being not untidy and Abraham being not enchanting.
if there is at least one people who is untidy and entire, then Culver is consistent and Burton is not enchanting.
If there is at least one people who is magnificent, then Jesse is not untidy and Jesse is entire.
Kerry being not traditional and Kerry being not untidy imply that Culver is enchanting.
If Kerry is not untidy or Brian is enchanting, then Carolina is magnificent.
Someone who is both not consistent and traditional is always not enchanting.
If Culver is not traditional, then Abraham is not entire and Kerry is consistent, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kerry is enchanting once knowing that Brian is not consistent.
If Kerry is not magnificent and Brian is entire, then Jesse is not enchanting and Brian is untidy, and vice versa.
If someone is not traditional or consistent, then he is not magnificent.
If there is at least one people who is not entire or consistent, then Jesse is untidy. | Abraham is enchanting. | contradiction |
Burton is traditional.
Carolina is magnificent.
Jesse is not consistent.
Jesse is not entire.
Jesse is traditional.
Kerry is not magnificent.
Abraham is untidy.
Culver is untidy.
Jesse is enchanting.
Abraham is not magnificent.
Kerry is traditional.
Abraham is consistent.Someone who is entire is always both not untidy and consistent.
Burton being traditional is equivalent to Abraham being not untidy and Abraham being not enchanting.
if there is at least one people who is untidy and entire, then Culver is consistent and Burton is not enchanting.
If there is at least one people who is magnificent, then Jesse is not untidy and Jesse is entire.
Kerry being not traditional and Kerry being not untidy imply that Culver is enchanting.
If Kerry is not untidy or Brian is enchanting, then Carolina is magnificent.
Someone who is both not consistent and traditional is always not enchanting.
If Culver is not traditional, then Abraham is not entire and Kerry is consistent, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kerry is enchanting once knowing that Brian is not consistent.
If Kerry is not magnificent and Brian is entire, then Jesse is not enchanting and Brian is untidy, and vice versa.
If someone is not traditional or consistent, then he is not magnificent.
If there is at least one people who is not entire or consistent, then Jesse is untidy. | Jesse is not enchanting. | self_contradiction |
Burton is traditional.
Carolina is magnificent.
Jesse is not consistent.
Jesse is not entire.
Jesse is traditional.
Kerry is not magnificent.
Abraham is untidy.
Culver is untidy.
Jesse is enchanting.
Abraham is not magnificent.
Kerry is traditional.
Abraham is consistent.Someone who is entire is always both not untidy and consistent.
Burton being traditional is equivalent to Abraham being not untidy and Abraham being not enchanting.
if there is at least one people who is untidy and entire, then Culver is consistent and Burton is not enchanting.
If there is at least one people who is magnificent, then Jesse is not untidy and Jesse is entire.
Kerry being not traditional and Kerry being not untidy imply that Culver is enchanting.
If Kerry is not untidy or Brian is enchanting, then Carolina is magnificent.
Someone who is both not consistent and traditional is always not enchanting.
If Culver is not traditional, then Abraham is not entire and Kerry is consistent, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kerry is enchanting once knowing that Brian is not consistent.
If Kerry is not magnificent and Brian is entire, then Jesse is not enchanting and Brian is untidy, and vice versa.
If someone is not traditional or consistent, then he is not magnificent.
If there is at least one people who is not entire or consistent, then Jesse is untidy. | Culver is not untidy. | contradiction |
Burton is traditional.
Carolina is magnificent.
Jesse is not consistent.
Jesse is not entire.
Jesse is traditional.
Kerry is not magnificent.
Abraham is untidy.
Culver is untidy.
Jesse is enchanting.
Abraham is not magnificent.
Kerry is traditional.
Abraham is consistent.Someone who is entire is always both not untidy and consistent.
Burton being traditional is equivalent to Abraham being not untidy and Abraham being not enchanting.
if there is at least one people who is untidy and entire, then Culver is consistent and Burton is not enchanting.
If there is at least one people who is magnificent, then Jesse is not untidy and Jesse is entire.
Kerry being not traditional and Kerry being not untidy imply that Culver is enchanting.
If Kerry is not untidy or Brian is enchanting, then Carolina is magnificent.
Someone who is both not consistent and traditional is always not enchanting.
If Culver is not traditional, then Abraham is not entire and Kerry is consistent, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kerry is enchanting once knowing that Brian is not consistent.
If Kerry is not magnificent and Brian is entire, then Jesse is not enchanting and Brian is untidy, and vice versa.
If someone is not traditional or consistent, then he is not magnificent.
If there is at least one people who is not entire or consistent, then Jesse is untidy. | Jesse is not traditional. | contradiction |
Burton is traditional.
Carolina is magnificent.
Jesse is not consistent.
Jesse is not entire.
Jesse is traditional.
Kerry is not magnificent.
Abraham is untidy.
Culver is untidy.
Jesse is enchanting.
Abraham is not magnificent.
Kerry is traditional.
Abraham is consistent.Someone who is entire is always both not untidy and consistent.
Burton being traditional is equivalent to Abraham being not untidy and Abraham being not enchanting.
if there is at least one people who is untidy and entire, then Culver is consistent and Burton is not enchanting.
If there is at least one people who is magnificent, then Jesse is not untidy and Jesse is entire.
Kerry being not traditional and Kerry being not untidy imply that Culver is enchanting.
If Kerry is not untidy or Brian is enchanting, then Carolina is magnificent.
Someone who is both not consistent and traditional is always not enchanting.
If Culver is not traditional, then Abraham is not entire and Kerry is consistent, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kerry is enchanting once knowing that Brian is not consistent.
If Kerry is not magnificent and Brian is entire, then Jesse is not enchanting and Brian is untidy, and vice versa.
If someone is not traditional or consistent, then he is not magnificent.
If there is at least one people who is not entire or consistent, then Jesse is untidy. | Abraham is magnificent. | contradiction |
Burton is traditional.
Carolina is magnificent.
Jesse is not consistent.
Jesse is not entire.
Jesse is traditional.
Kerry is not magnificent.
Abraham is untidy.
Culver is untidy.
Jesse is enchanting.
Abraham is not magnificent.
Kerry is traditional.
Abraham is consistent.Someone who is entire is always both not untidy and consistent.
Burton being traditional is equivalent to Abraham being not untidy and Abraham being not enchanting.
if there is at least one people who is untidy and entire, then Culver is consistent and Burton is not enchanting.
If there is at least one people who is magnificent, then Jesse is not untidy and Jesse is entire.
Kerry being not traditional and Kerry being not untidy imply that Culver is enchanting.
If Kerry is not untidy or Brian is enchanting, then Carolina is magnificent.
Someone who is both not consistent and traditional is always not enchanting.
If Culver is not traditional, then Abraham is not entire and Kerry is consistent, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kerry is enchanting once knowing that Brian is not consistent.
If Kerry is not magnificent and Brian is entire, then Jesse is not enchanting and Brian is untidy, and vice versa.
If someone is not traditional or consistent, then he is not magnificent.
If there is at least one people who is not entire or consistent, then Jesse is untidy. | Carolina is not consistent. | neutral |
Burton is traditional.
Carolina is magnificent.
Jesse is not consistent.
Jesse is not entire.
Jesse is traditional.
Kerry is not magnificent.
Abraham is untidy.
Culver is untidy.
Jesse is enchanting.
Abraham is not magnificent.
Kerry is traditional.
Abraham is consistent.Someone who is entire is always both not untidy and consistent.
Burton being traditional is equivalent to Abraham being not untidy and Abraham being not enchanting.
if there is at least one people who is untidy and entire, then Culver is consistent and Burton is not enchanting.
If there is at least one people who is magnificent, then Jesse is not untidy and Jesse is entire.
Kerry being not traditional and Kerry being not untidy imply that Culver is enchanting.
If Kerry is not untidy or Brian is enchanting, then Carolina is magnificent.
Someone who is both not consistent and traditional is always not enchanting.
If Culver is not traditional, then Abraham is not entire and Kerry is consistent, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kerry is enchanting once knowing that Brian is not consistent.
If Kerry is not magnificent and Brian is entire, then Jesse is not enchanting and Brian is untidy, and vice versa.
If someone is not traditional or consistent, then he is not magnificent.
If there is at least one people who is not entire or consistent, then Jesse is untidy. | Burton is not enchanting. | entailment |
Burton is traditional.
Carolina is magnificent.
Jesse is not consistent.
Jesse is not entire.
Jesse is traditional.
Kerry is not magnificent.
Abraham is untidy.
Culver is untidy.
Jesse is enchanting.
Abraham is not magnificent.
Kerry is traditional.
Abraham is consistent.Someone who is entire is always both not untidy and consistent.
Burton being traditional is equivalent to Abraham being not untidy and Abraham being not enchanting.
if there is at least one people who is untidy and entire, then Culver is consistent and Burton is not enchanting.
If there is at least one people who is magnificent, then Jesse is not untidy and Jesse is entire.
Kerry being not traditional and Kerry being not untidy imply that Culver is enchanting.
If Kerry is not untidy or Brian is enchanting, then Carolina is magnificent.
Someone who is both not consistent and traditional is always not enchanting.
If Culver is not traditional, then Abraham is not entire and Kerry is consistent, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kerry is enchanting once knowing that Brian is not consistent.
If Kerry is not magnificent and Brian is entire, then Jesse is not enchanting and Brian is untidy, and vice versa.
If someone is not traditional or consistent, then he is not magnificent.
If there is at least one people who is not entire or consistent, then Jesse is untidy. | Carolina is untidy. | neutral |
Burton is traditional.
Carolina is magnificent.
Jesse is not consistent.
Jesse is not entire.
Jesse is traditional.
Kerry is not magnificent.
Abraham is untidy.
Culver is untidy.
Jesse is enchanting.
Abraham is not magnificent.
Kerry is traditional.
Abraham is consistent.Someone who is entire is always both not untidy and consistent.
Burton being traditional is equivalent to Abraham being not untidy and Abraham being not enchanting.
if there is at least one people who is untidy and entire, then Culver is consistent and Burton is not enchanting.
If there is at least one people who is magnificent, then Jesse is not untidy and Jesse is entire.
Kerry being not traditional and Kerry being not untidy imply that Culver is enchanting.
If Kerry is not untidy or Brian is enchanting, then Carolina is magnificent.
Someone who is both not consistent and traditional is always not enchanting.
If Culver is not traditional, then Abraham is not entire and Kerry is consistent, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kerry is enchanting once knowing that Brian is not consistent.
If Kerry is not magnificent and Brian is entire, then Jesse is not enchanting and Brian is untidy, and vice versa.
If someone is not traditional or consistent, then he is not magnificent.
If there is at least one people who is not entire or consistent, then Jesse is untidy. | Burton is traditional. | entailment |
Burton is traditional.
Carolina is magnificent.
Jesse is not consistent.
Jesse is not entire.
Jesse is traditional.
Kerry is not magnificent.
Abraham is untidy.
Culver is untidy.
Jesse is enchanting.
Abraham is not magnificent.
Kerry is traditional.
Abraham is consistent.Someone who is entire is always both not untidy and consistent.
Burton being traditional is equivalent to Abraham being not untidy and Abraham being not enchanting.
if there is at least one people who is untidy and entire, then Culver is consistent and Burton is not enchanting.
If there is at least one people who is magnificent, then Jesse is not untidy and Jesse is entire.
Kerry being not traditional and Kerry being not untidy imply that Culver is enchanting.
If Kerry is not untidy or Brian is enchanting, then Carolina is magnificent.
Someone who is both not consistent and traditional is always not enchanting.
If Culver is not traditional, then Abraham is not entire and Kerry is consistent, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kerry is enchanting once knowing that Brian is not consistent.
If Kerry is not magnificent and Brian is entire, then Jesse is not enchanting and Brian is untidy, and vice versa.
If someone is not traditional or consistent, then he is not magnificent.
If there is at least one people who is not entire or consistent, then Jesse is untidy. | Culver is not magnificent. | entailment |
Burton is traditional.
Carolina is magnificent.
Jesse is not consistent.
Jesse is not entire.
Jesse is traditional.
Kerry is not magnificent.
Abraham is untidy.
Culver is untidy.
Jesse is enchanting.
Abraham is not magnificent.
Kerry is traditional.
Abraham is consistent.Someone who is entire is always both not untidy and consistent.
Burton being traditional is equivalent to Abraham being not untidy and Abraham being not enchanting.
if there is at least one people who is untidy and entire, then Culver is consistent and Burton is not enchanting.
If there is at least one people who is magnificent, then Jesse is not untidy and Jesse is entire.
Kerry being not traditional and Kerry being not untidy imply that Culver is enchanting.
If Kerry is not untidy or Brian is enchanting, then Carolina is magnificent.
Someone who is both not consistent and traditional is always not enchanting.
If Culver is not traditional, then Abraham is not entire and Kerry is consistent, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kerry is enchanting once knowing that Brian is not consistent.
If Kerry is not magnificent and Brian is entire, then Jesse is not enchanting and Brian is untidy, and vice versa.
If someone is not traditional or consistent, then he is not magnificent.
If there is at least one people who is not entire or consistent, then Jesse is untidy. | Jesse is enchanting. | self_contradiction |
Burton is traditional.
Carolina is magnificent.
Jesse is not consistent.
Jesse is not entire.
Jesse is traditional.
Kerry is not magnificent.
Abraham is untidy.
Culver is untidy.
Jesse is enchanting.
Abraham is not magnificent.
Kerry is traditional.
Abraham is consistent.Someone who is entire is always both not untidy and consistent.
Burton being traditional is equivalent to Abraham being not untidy and Abraham being not enchanting.
if there is at least one people who is untidy and entire, then Culver is consistent and Burton is not enchanting.
If there is at least one people who is magnificent, then Jesse is not untidy and Jesse is entire.
Kerry being not traditional and Kerry being not untidy imply that Culver is enchanting.
If Kerry is not untidy or Brian is enchanting, then Carolina is magnificent.
Someone who is both not consistent and traditional is always not enchanting.
If Culver is not traditional, then Abraham is not entire and Kerry is consistent, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kerry is enchanting once knowing that Brian is not consistent.
If Kerry is not magnificent and Brian is entire, then Jesse is not enchanting and Brian is untidy, and vice versa.
If someone is not traditional or consistent, then he is not magnificent.
If there is at least one people who is not entire or consistent, then Jesse is untidy. | Brian is not consistent. | neutral |
Burton is traditional.
Carolina is magnificent.
Jesse is not consistent.
Jesse is not entire.
Jesse is traditional.
Kerry is not magnificent.
Abraham is untidy.
Culver is untidy.
Jesse is enchanting.
Abraham is not magnificent.
Kerry is traditional.
Abraham is consistent.Someone who is entire is always both not untidy and consistent.
Burton being traditional is equivalent to Abraham being not untidy and Abraham being not enchanting.
if there is at least one people who is untidy and entire, then Culver is consistent and Burton is not enchanting.
If there is at least one people who is magnificent, then Jesse is not untidy and Jesse is entire.
Kerry being not traditional and Kerry being not untidy imply that Culver is enchanting.
If Kerry is not untidy or Brian is enchanting, then Carolina is magnificent.
Someone who is both not consistent and traditional is always not enchanting.
If Culver is not traditional, then Abraham is not entire and Kerry is consistent, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kerry is enchanting once knowing that Brian is not consistent.
If Kerry is not magnificent and Brian is entire, then Jesse is not enchanting and Brian is untidy, and vice versa.
If someone is not traditional or consistent, then he is not magnificent.
If there is at least one people who is not entire or consistent, then Jesse is untidy. | Brian is not untidy. | neutral |
Burton is traditional.
Carolina is magnificent.
Jesse is not consistent.
Jesse is not entire.
Jesse is traditional.
Kerry is not magnificent.
Abraham is untidy.
Culver is untidy.
Jesse is enchanting.
Abraham is not magnificent.
Kerry is traditional.
Abraham is consistent.Someone who is entire is always both not untidy and consistent.
Burton being traditional is equivalent to Abraham being not untidy and Abraham being not enchanting.
if there is at least one people who is untidy and entire, then Culver is consistent and Burton is not enchanting.
If there is at least one people who is magnificent, then Jesse is not untidy and Jesse is entire.
Kerry being not traditional and Kerry being not untidy imply that Culver is enchanting.
If Kerry is not untidy or Brian is enchanting, then Carolina is magnificent.
Someone who is both not consistent and traditional is always not enchanting.
If Culver is not traditional, then Abraham is not entire and Kerry is consistent, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kerry is enchanting once knowing that Brian is not consistent.
If Kerry is not magnificent and Brian is entire, then Jesse is not enchanting and Brian is untidy, and vice versa.
If someone is not traditional or consistent, then he is not magnificent.
If there is at least one people who is not entire or consistent, then Jesse is untidy. | Jesse is not untidy. | self_contradiction |
Burton is traditional.
Carolina is magnificent.
Jesse is not consistent.
Jesse is not entire.
Jesse is traditional.
Kerry is not magnificent.
Abraham is untidy.
Culver is untidy.
Jesse is enchanting.
Abraham is not magnificent.
Kerry is traditional.
Abraham is consistent.Someone who is entire is always both not untidy and consistent.
Burton being traditional is equivalent to Abraham being not untidy and Abraham being not enchanting.
if there is at least one people who is untidy and entire, then Culver is consistent and Burton is not enchanting.
If there is at least one people who is magnificent, then Jesse is not untidy and Jesse is entire.
Kerry being not traditional and Kerry being not untidy imply that Culver is enchanting.
If Kerry is not untidy or Brian is enchanting, then Carolina is magnificent.
Someone who is both not consistent and traditional is always not enchanting.
If Culver is not traditional, then Abraham is not entire and Kerry is consistent, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kerry is enchanting once knowing that Brian is not consistent.
If Kerry is not magnificent and Brian is entire, then Jesse is not enchanting and Brian is untidy, and vice versa.
If someone is not traditional or consistent, then he is not magnificent.
If there is at least one people who is not entire or consistent, then Jesse is untidy. | Jesse is not magnificent. | entailment |
Burton is traditional.
Carolina is magnificent.
Jesse is not consistent.
Jesse is not entire.
Jesse is traditional.
Kerry is not magnificent.
Abraham is untidy.
Culver is untidy.
Jesse is enchanting.
Abraham is not magnificent.
Kerry is traditional.
Abraham is consistent.Someone who is entire is always both not untidy and consistent.
Burton being traditional is equivalent to Abraham being not untidy and Abraham being not enchanting.
if there is at least one people who is untidy and entire, then Culver is consistent and Burton is not enchanting.
If there is at least one people who is magnificent, then Jesse is not untidy and Jesse is entire.
Kerry being not traditional and Kerry being not untidy imply that Culver is enchanting.
If Kerry is not untidy or Brian is enchanting, then Carolina is magnificent.
Someone who is both not consistent and traditional is always not enchanting.
If Culver is not traditional, then Abraham is not entire and Kerry is consistent, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kerry is enchanting once knowing that Brian is not consistent.
If Kerry is not magnificent and Brian is entire, then Jesse is not enchanting and Brian is untidy, and vice versa.
If someone is not traditional or consistent, then he is not magnificent.
If there is at least one people who is not entire or consistent, then Jesse is untidy. | Kerry is magnificent. | contradiction |
Orlando is horrible.
Chad is not critical.
Silas is mental.
Crispin is not critical.
Todd is critical.
Crispin is dark.
Justin is not critical.
Todd is funny.
Silas is eastern.
Justin is eastern.
Chad is not horrible.
Chad is not dark.If someone is horrible, then he is not dark, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not eastern, then Chad is dark and Justin is not mental.
Roswell being horrible is equivalent to Crispin being mental.
Someone who is not funny is always not eastern.
If someone is not funny or dark, then he is critical.
If there is at least one people who is not funny or critical, then Roswell is horrible.
Someone who is dark is always both funny and not horrible.
If there is someone who is not funny, then Todd is not mental and Justin is not critical.
It can be concluded that Roswell is not mental once knowing that Crispin is horrible and Chad is critical.
All not horrible people are not critical.
Someone being both dark and eastern is equivalent to being funny.
Someone who is not funny is always eastern. | Roswell is dark. | contradiction |
Orlando is horrible.
Chad is not critical.
Silas is mental.
Crispin is not critical.
Todd is critical.
Crispin is dark.
Justin is not critical.
Todd is funny.
Silas is eastern.
Justin is eastern.
Chad is not horrible.
Chad is not dark.If someone is horrible, then he is not dark, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not eastern, then Chad is dark and Justin is not mental.
Roswell being horrible is equivalent to Crispin being mental.
Someone who is not funny is always not eastern.
If someone is not funny or dark, then he is critical.
If there is at least one people who is not funny or critical, then Roswell is horrible.
Someone who is dark is always both funny and not horrible.
If there is someone who is not funny, then Todd is not mental and Justin is not critical.
It can be concluded that Roswell is not mental once knowing that Crispin is horrible and Chad is critical.
All not horrible people are not critical.
Someone being both dark and eastern is equivalent to being funny.
Someone who is not funny is always eastern. | Silas is funny. | neutral |
Orlando is horrible.
Chad is not critical.
Silas is mental.
Crispin is not critical.
Todd is critical.
Crispin is dark.
Justin is not critical.
Todd is funny.
Silas is eastern.
Justin is eastern.
Chad is not horrible.
Chad is not dark.If someone is horrible, then he is not dark, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not eastern, then Chad is dark and Justin is not mental.
Roswell being horrible is equivalent to Crispin being mental.
Someone who is not funny is always not eastern.
If someone is not funny or dark, then he is critical.
If there is at least one people who is not funny or critical, then Roswell is horrible.
Someone who is dark is always both funny and not horrible.
If there is someone who is not funny, then Todd is not mental and Justin is not critical.
It can be concluded that Roswell is not mental once knowing that Crispin is horrible and Chad is critical.
All not horrible people are not critical.
Someone being both dark and eastern is equivalent to being funny.
Someone who is not funny is always eastern. | Roswell is mental. | neutral |
Orlando is horrible.
Chad is not critical.
Silas is mental.
Crispin is not critical.
Todd is critical.
Crispin is dark.
Justin is not critical.
Todd is funny.
Silas is eastern.
Justin is eastern.
Chad is not horrible.
Chad is not dark.If someone is horrible, then he is not dark, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not eastern, then Chad is dark and Justin is not mental.
Roswell being horrible is equivalent to Crispin being mental.
Someone who is not funny is always not eastern.
If someone is not funny or dark, then he is critical.
If there is at least one people who is not funny or critical, then Roswell is horrible.
Someone who is dark is always both funny and not horrible.
If there is someone who is not funny, then Todd is not mental and Justin is not critical.
It can be concluded that Roswell is not mental once knowing that Crispin is horrible and Chad is critical.
All not horrible people are not critical.
Someone being both dark and eastern is equivalent to being funny.
Someone who is not funny is always eastern. | Orlando is critical. | neutral |
Orlando is horrible.
Chad is not critical.
Silas is mental.
Crispin is not critical.
Todd is critical.
Crispin is dark.
Justin is not critical.
Todd is funny.
Silas is eastern.
Justin is eastern.
Chad is not horrible.
Chad is not dark.If someone is horrible, then he is not dark, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not eastern, then Chad is dark and Justin is not mental.
Roswell being horrible is equivalent to Crispin being mental.
Someone who is not funny is always not eastern.
If someone is not funny or dark, then he is critical.
If there is at least one people who is not funny or critical, then Roswell is horrible.
Someone who is dark is always both funny and not horrible.
If there is someone who is not funny, then Todd is not mental and Justin is not critical.
It can be concluded that Roswell is not mental once knowing that Crispin is horrible and Chad is critical.
All not horrible people are not critical.
Someone being both dark and eastern is equivalent to being funny.
Someone who is not funny is always eastern. | Silas is not horrible. | neutral |
Orlando is horrible.
Chad is not critical.
Silas is mental.
Crispin is not critical.
Todd is critical.
Crispin is dark.
Justin is not critical.
Todd is funny.
Silas is eastern.
Justin is eastern.
Chad is not horrible.
Chad is not dark.If someone is horrible, then he is not dark, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not eastern, then Chad is dark and Justin is not mental.
Roswell being horrible is equivalent to Crispin being mental.
Someone who is not funny is always not eastern.
If someone is not funny or dark, then he is critical.
If there is at least one people who is not funny or critical, then Roswell is horrible.
Someone who is dark is always both funny and not horrible.
If there is someone who is not funny, then Todd is not mental and Justin is not critical.
It can be concluded that Roswell is not mental once knowing that Crispin is horrible and Chad is critical.
All not horrible people are not critical.
Someone being both dark and eastern is equivalent to being funny.
Someone who is not funny is always eastern. | Chad is critical. | contradiction |
Orlando is horrible.
Chad is not critical.
Silas is mental.
Crispin is not critical.
Todd is critical.
Crispin is dark.
Justin is not critical.
Todd is funny.
Silas is eastern.
Justin is eastern.
Chad is not horrible.
Chad is not dark.If someone is horrible, then he is not dark, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not eastern, then Chad is dark and Justin is not mental.
Roswell being horrible is equivalent to Crispin being mental.
Someone who is not funny is always not eastern.
If someone is not funny or dark, then he is critical.
If there is at least one people who is not funny or critical, then Roswell is horrible.
Someone who is dark is always both funny and not horrible.
If there is someone who is not funny, then Todd is not mental and Justin is not critical.
It can be concluded that Roswell is not mental once knowing that Crispin is horrible and Chad is critical.
All not horrible people are not critical.
Someone being both dark and eastern is equivalent to being funny.
Someone who is not funny is always eastern. | Todd is mental. | neutral |
Orlando is horrible.
Chad is not critical.
Silas is mental.
Crispin is not critical.
Todd is critical.
Crispin is dark.
Justin is not critical.
Todd is funny.
Silas is eastern.
Justin is eastern.
Chad is not horrible.
Chad is not dark.If someone is horrible, then he is not dark, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not eastern, then Chad is dark and Justin is not mental.
Roswell being horrible is equivalent to Crispin being mental.
Someone who is not funny is always not eastern.
If someone is not funny or dark, then he is critical.
If there is at least one people who is not funny or critical, then Roswell is horrible.
Someone who is dark is always both funny and not horrible.
If there is someone who is not funny, then Todd is not mental and Justin is not critical.
It can be concluded that Roswell is not mental once knowing that Crispin is horrible and Chad is critical.
All not horrible people are not critical.
Someone being both dark and eastern is equivalent to being funny.
Someone who is not funny is always eastern. | Crispin is critical. | self_contradiction |
Orlando is horrible.
Chad is not critical.
Silas is mental.
Crispin is not critical.
Todd is critical.
Crispin is dark.
Justin is not critical.
Todd is funny.
Silas is eastern.
Justin is eastern.
Chad is not horrible.
Chad is not dark.If someone is horrible, then he is not dark, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not eastern, then Chad is dark and Justin is not mental.
Roswell being horrible is equivalent to Crispin being mental.
Someone who is not funny is always not eastern.
If someone is not funny or dark, then he is critical.
If there is at least one people who is not funny or critical, then Roswell is horrible.
Someone who is dark is always both funny and not horrible.
If there is someone who is not funny, then Todd is not mental and Justin is not critical.
It can be concluded that Roswell is not mental once knowing that Crispin is horrible and Chad is critical.
All not horrible people are not critical.
Someone being both dark and eastern is equivalent to being funny.
Someone who is not funny is always eastern. | Crispin is eastern. | entailment |
Orlando is horrible.
Chad is not critical.
Silas is mental.
Crispin is not critical.
Todd is critical.
Crispin is dark.
Justin is not critical.
Todd is funny.
Silas is eastern.
Justin is eastern.
Chad is not horrible.
Chad is not dark.If someone is horrible, then he is not dark, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not eastern, then Chad is dark and Justin is not mental.
Roswell being horrible is equivalent to Crispin being mental.
Someone who is not funny is always not eastern.
If someone is not funny or dark, then he is critical.
If there is at least one people who is not funny or critical, then Roswell is horrible.
Someone who is dark is always both funny and not horrible.
If there is someone who is not funny, then Todd is not mental and Justin is not critical.
It can be concluded that Roswell is not mental once knowing that Crispin is horrible and Chad is critical.
All not horrible people are not critical.
Someone being both dark and eastern is equivalent to being funny.
Someone who is not funny is always eastern. | Chad is dark. | contradiction |
Orlando is horrible.
Chad is not critical.
Silas is mental.
Crispin is not critical.
Todd is critical.
Crispin is dark.
Justin is not critical.
Todd is funny.
Silas is eastern.
Justin is eastern.
Chad is not horrible.
Chad is not dark.If someone is horrible, then he is not dark, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not eastern, then Chad is dark and Justin is not mental.
Roswell being horrible is equivalent to Crispin being mental.
Someone who is not funny is always not eastern.
If someone is not funny or dark, then he is critical.
If there is at least one people who is not funny or critical, then Roswell is horrible.
Someone who is dark is always both funny and not horrible.
If there is someone who is not funny, then Todd is not mental and Justin is not critical.
It can be concluded that Roswell is not mental once knowing that Crispin is horrible and Chad is critical.
All not horrible people are not critical.
Someone being both dark and eastern is equivalent to being funny.
Someone who is not funny is always eastern. | Todd is not critical. | self_contradiction |
Orlando is horrible.
Chad is not critical.
Silas is mental.
Crispin is not critical.
Todd is critical.
Crispin is dark.
Justin is not critical.
Todd is funny.
Silas is eastern.
Justin is eastern.
Chad is not horrible.
Chad is not dark.If someone is horrible, then he is not dark, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not eastern, then Chad is dark and Justin is not mental.
Roswell being horrible is equivalent to Crispin being mental.
Someone who is not funny is always not eastern.
If someone is not funny or dark, then he is critical.
If there is at least one people who is not funny or critical, then Roswell is horrible.
Someone who is dark is always both funny and not horrible.
If there is someone who is not funny, then Todd is not mental and Justin is not critical.
It can be concluded that Roswell is not mental once knowing that Crispin is horrible and Chad is critical.
All not horrible people are not critical.
Someone being both dark and eastern is equivalent to being funny.
Someone who is not funny is always eastern. | Justin is eastern. | entailment |
Orlando is horrible.
Chad is not critical.
Silas is mental.
Crispin is not critical.
Todd is critical.
Crispin is dark.
Justin is not critical.
Todd is funny.
Silas is eastern.
Justin is eastern.
Chad is not horrible.
Chad is not dark.If someone is horrible, then he is not dark, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not eastern, then Chad is dark and Justin is not mental.
Roswell being horrible is equivalent to Crispin being mental.
Someone who is not funny is always not eastern.
If someone is not funny or dark, then he is critical.
If there is at least one people who is not funny or critical, then Roswell is horrible.
Someone who is dark is always both funny and not horrible.
If there is someone who is not funny, then Todd is not mental and Justin is not critical.
It can be concluded that Roswell is not mental once knowing that Crispin is horrible and Chad is critical.
All not horrible people are not critical.
Someone being both dark and eastern is equivalent to being funny.
Someone who is not funny is always eastern. | Chad is not horrible. | self_contradiction |
Orlando is horrible.
Chad is not critical.
Silas is mental.
Crispin is not critical.
Todd is critical.
Crispin is dark.
Justin is not critical.
Todd is funny.
Silas is eastern.
Justin is eastern.
Chad is not horrible.
Chad is not dark.If someone is horrible, then he is not dark, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not eastern, then Chad is dark and Justin is not mental.
Roswell being horrible is equivalent to Crispin being mental.
Someone who is not funny is always not eastern.
If someone is not funny or dark, then he is critical.
If there is at least one people who is not funny or critical, then Roswell is horrible.
Someone who is dark is always both funny and not horrible.
If there is someone who is not funny, then Todd is not mental and Justin is not critical.
It can be concluded that Roswell is not mental once knowing that Crispin is horrible and Chad is critical.
All not horrible people are not critical.
Someone being both dark and eastern is equivalent to being funny.
Someone who is not funny is always eastern. | Todd is critical. | self_contradiction |
Orlando is horrible.
Chad is not critical.
Silas is mental.
Crispin is not critical.
Todd is critical.
Crispin is dark.
Justin is not critical.
Todd is funny.
Silas is eastern.
Justin is eastern.
Chad is not horrible.
Chad is not dark.If someone is horrible, then he is not dark, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not eastern, then Chad is dark and Justin is not mental.
Roswell being horrible is equivalent to Crispin being mental.
Someone who is not funny is always not eastern.
If someone is not funny or dark, then he is critical.
If there is at least one people who is not funny or critical, then Roswell is horrible.
Someone who is dark is always both funny and not horrible.
If there is someone who is not funny, then Todd is not mental and Justin is not critical.
It can be concluded that Roswell is not mental once knowing that Crispin is horrible and Chad is critical.
All not horrible people are not critical.
Someone being both dark and eastern is equivalent to being funny.
Someone who is not funny is always eastern. | Justin is not eastern. | contradiction |
Orlando is horrible.
Chad is not critical.
Silas is mental.
Crispin is not critical.
Todd is critical.
Crispin is dark.
Justin is not critical.
Todd is funny.
Silas is eastern.
Justin is eastern.
Chad is not horrible.
Chad is not dark.If someone is horrible, then he is not dark, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not eastern, then Chad is dark and Justin is not mental.
Roswell being horrible is equivalent to Crispin being mental.
Someone who is not funny is always not eastern.
If someone is not funny or dark, then he is critical.
If there is at least one people who is not funny or critical, then Roswell is horrible.
Someone who is dark is always both funny and not horrible.
If there is someone who is not funny, then Todd is not mental and Justin is not critical.
It can be concluded that Roswell is not mental once knowing that Crispin is horrible and Chad is critical.
All not horrible people are not critical.
Someone being both dark and eastern is equivalent to being funny.
Someone who is not funny is always eastern. | Crispin is funny. | entailment |
Orlando is horrible.
Chad is not critical.
Silas is mental.
Crispin is not critical.
Todd is critical.
Crispin is dark.
Justin is not critical.
Todd is funny.
Silas is eastern.
Justin is eastern.
Chad is not horrible.
Chad is not dark.If someone is horrible, then he is not dark, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not eastern, then Chad is dark and Justin is not mental.
Roswell being horrible is equivalent to Crispin being mental.
Someone who is not funny is always not eastern.
If someone is not funny or dark, then he is critical.
If there is at least one people who is not funny or critical, then Roswell is horrible.
Someone who is dark is always both funny and not horrible.
If there is someone who is not funny, then Todd is not mental and Justin is not critical.
It can be concluded that Roswell is not mental once knowing that Crispin is horrible and Chad is critical.
All not horrible people are not critical.
Someone being both dark and eastern is equivalent to being funny.
Someone who is not funny is always eastern. | Roswell is not dark. | entailment |
Orlando is horrible.
Chad is not critical.
Silas is mental.
Crispin is not critical.
Todd is critical.
Crispin is dark.
Justin is not critical.
Todd is funny.
Silas is eastern.
Justin is eastern.
Chad is not horrible.
Chad is not dark.If someone is horrible, then he is not dark, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not eastern, then Chad is dark and Justin is not mental.
Roswell being horrible is equivalent to Crispin being mental.
Someone who is not funny is always not eastern.
If someone is not funny or dark, then he is critical.
If there is at least one people who is not funny or critical, then Roswell is horrible.
Someone who is dark is always both funny and not horrible.
If there is someone who is not funny, then Todd is not mental and Justin is not critical.
It can be concluded that Roswell is not mental once knowing that Crispin is horrible and Chad is critical.
All not horrible people are not critical.
Someone being both dark and eastern is equivalent to being funny.
Someone who is not funny is always eastern. | Silas is not mental. | contradiction |
Orlando is horrible.
Chad is not critical.
Silas is mental.
Crispin is not critical.
Todd is critical.
Crispin is dark.
Justin is not critical.
Todd is funny.
Silas is eastern.
Justin is eastern.
Chad is not horrible.
Chad is not dark.If someone is horrible, then he is not dark, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not eastern, then Chad is dark and Justin is not mental.
Roswell being horrible is equivalent to Crispin being mental.
Someone who is not funny is always not eastern.
If someone is not funny or dark, then he is critical.
If there is at least one people who is not funny or critical, then Roswell is horrible.
Someone who is dark is always both funny and not horrible.
If there is someone who is not funny, then Todd is not mental and Justin is not critical.
It can be concluded that Roswell is not mental once knowing that Crispin is horrible and Chad is critical.
All not horrible people are not critical.
Someone being both dark and eastern is equivalent to being funny.
Someone who is not funny is always eastern. | Chad is not critical. | entailment |
Orlando is horrible.
Chad is not critical.
Silas is mental.
Crispin is not critical.
Todd is critical.
Crispin is dark.
Justin is not critical.
Todd is funny.
Silas is eastern.
Justin is eastern.
Chad is not horrible.
Chad is not dark.If someone is horrible, then he is not dark, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not eastern, then Chad is dark and Justin is not mental.
Roswell being horrible is equivalent to Crispin being mental.
Someone who is not funny is always not eastern.
If someone is not funny or dark, then he is critical.
If there is at least one people who is not funny or critical, then Roswell is horrible.
Someone who is dark is always both funny and not horrible.
If there is someone who is not funny, then Todd is not mental and Justin is not critical.
It can be concluded that Roswell is not mental once knowing that Crispin is horrible and Chad is critical.
All not horrible people are not critical.
Someone being both dark and eastern is equivalent to being funny.
Someone who is not funny is always eastern. | Crispin is not critical. | self_contradiction |
Joe is beige.
Joe is victorious.
Jesse is not beige.
Morris is not petite.
Norman is beige.
Norman is not petite.
Eunice is not rational.
Jesse is not victorious.
Eunice is beige.
Morris is not beige.
Sophie is exuberant.
Norman is messy.If someone is either exuberant or beige, then he is not messy and not petite.
If all people are beige, then Eunice is petite.
Someone who is not exuberant is always both not victorious and rational.
Someone who is eithor victorious or beige is always not petite.
If there is someone who is either not petite or not beige, then Morris is not exuberant and Eunice is not victorious.
It can be concluded that Lincoln is not victorious and Joe is beige once knowing that Jesse is not exuberant and Morris is not messy.
If someone is not petite and victorious, then he is beige, and vice versa.
If someone is both not petite and beige, then he is not exuberant.
Someone who is not victorious is always not beige.
If there is someone who is not petite, then Morris is not rational.
It can be concluded that Sophie is rational and Jesse is not victorious once knowing that Lincoln is beige.
If Sophie is not rational or Sophie is not beige, then Jesse is not messy. | Norman is not victorious. | self_contradiction |
Joe is beige.
Joe is victorious.
Jesse is not beige.
Morris is not petite.
Norman is beige.
Norman is not petite.
Eunice is not rational.
Jesse is not victorious.
Eunice is beige.
Morris is not beige.
Sophie is exuberant.
Norman is messy.If someone is either exuberant or beige, then he is not messy and not petite.
If all people are beige, then Eunice is petite.
Someone who is not exuberant is always both not victorious and rational.
Someone who is eithor victorious or beige is always not petite.
If there is someone who is either not petite or not beige, then Morris is not exuberant and Eunice is not victorious.
It can be concluded that Lincoln is not victorious and Joe is beige once knowing that Jesse is not exuberant and Morris is not messy.
If someone is not petite and victorious, then he is beige, and vice versa.
If someone is both not petite and beige, then he is not exuberant.
Someone who is not victorious is always not beige.
If there is someone who is not petite, then Morris is not rational.
It can be concluded that Sophie is rational and Jesse is not victorious once knowing that Lincoln is beige.
If Sophie is not rational or Sophie is not beige, then Jesse is not messy. | Joe is not victorious. | self_contradiction |
Joe is beige.
Joe is victorious.
Jesse is not beige.
Morris is not petite.
Norman is beige.
Norman is not petite.
Eunice is not rational.
Jesse is not victorious.
Eunice is beige.
Morris is not beige.
Sophie is exuberant.
Norman is messy.If someone is either exuberant or beige, then he is not messy and not petite.
If all people are beige, then Eunice is petite.
Someone who is not exuberant is always both not victorious and rational.
Someone who is eithor victorious or beige is always not petite.
If there is someone who is either not petite or not beige, then Morris is not exuberant and Eunice is not victorious.
It can be concluded that Lincoln is not victorious and Joe is beige once knowing that Jesse is not exuberant and Morris is not messy.
If someone is not petite and victorious, then he is beige, and vice versa.
If someone is both not petite and beige, then he is not exuberant.
Someone who is not victorious is always not beige.
If there is someone who is not petite, then Morris is not rational.
It can be concluded that Sophie is rational and Jesse is not victorious once knowing that Lincoln is beige.
If Sophie is not rational or Sophie is not beige, then Jesse is not messy. | Lincoln is not beige. | neutral |
Joe is beige.
Joe is victorious.
Jesse is not beige.
Morris is not petite.
Norman is beige.
Norman is not petite.
Eunice is not rational.
Jesse is not victorious.
Eunice is beige.
Morris is not beige.
Sophie is exuberant.
Norman is messy.If someone is either exuberant or beige, then he is not messy and not petite.
If all people are beige, then Eunice is petite.
Someone who is not exuberant is always both not victorious and rational.
Someone who is eithor victorious or beige is always not petite.
If there is someone who is either not petite or not beige, then Morris is not exuberant and Eunice is not victorious.
It can be concluded that Lincoln is not victorious and Joe is beige once knowing that Jesse is not exuberant and Morris is not messy.
If someone is not petite and victorious, then he is beige, and vice versa.
If someone is both not petite and beige, then he is not exuberant.
Someone who is not victorious is always not beige.
If there is someone who is not petite, then Morris is not rational.
It can be concluded that Sophie is rational and Jesse is not victorious once knowing that Lincoln is beige.
If Sophie is not rational or Sophie is not beige, then Jesse is not messy. | Sophie is not messy. | entailment |
Joe is beige.
Joe is victorious.
Jesse is not beige.
Morris is not petite.
Norman is beige.
Norman is not petite.
Eunice is not rational.
Jesse is not victorious.
Eunice is beige.
Morris is not beige.
Sophie is exuberant.
Norman is messy.If someone is either exuberant or beige, then he is not messy and not petite.
If all people are beige, then Eunice is petite.
Someone who is not exuberant is always both not victorious and rational.
Someone who is eithor victorious or beige is always not petite.
If there is someone who is either not petite or not beige, then Morris is not exuberant and Eunice is not victorious.
It can be concluded that Lincoln is not victorious and Joe is beige once knowing that Jesse is not exuberant and Morris is not messy.
If someone is not petite and victorious, then he is beige, and vice versa.
If someone is both not petite and beige, then he is not exuberant.
Someone who is not victorious is always not beige.
If there is someone who is not petite, then Morris is not rational.
It can be concluded that Sophie is rational and Jesse is not victorious once knowing that Lincoln is beige.
If Sophie is not rational or Sophie is not beige, then Jesse is not messy. | Morris is exuberant. | contradiction |
Joe is beige.
Joe is victorious.
Jesse is not beige.
Morris is not petite.
Norman is beige.
Norman is not petite.
Eunice is not rational.
Jesse is not victorious.
Eunice is beige.
Morris is not beige.
Sophie is exuberant.
Norman is messy.If someone is either exuberant or beige, then he is not messy and not petite.
If all people are beige, then Eunice is petite.
Someone who is not exuberant is always both not victorious and rational.
Someone who is eithor victorious or beige is always not petite.
If there is someone who is either not petite or not beige, then Morris is not exuberant and Eunice is not victorious.
It can be concluded that Lincoln is not victorious and Joe is beige once knowing that Jesse is not exuberant and Morris is not messy.
If someone is not petite and victorious, then he is beige, and vice versa.
If someone is both not petite and beige, then he is not exuberant.
Someone who is not victorious is always not beige.
If there is someone who is not petite, then Morris is not rational.
It can be concluded that Sophie is rational and Jesse is not victorious once knowing that Lincoln is beige.
If Sophie is not rational or Sophie is not beige, then Jesse is not messy. | Lincoln is beige. | neutral |
Joe is beige.
Joe is victorious.
Jesse is not beige.
Morris is not petite.
Norman is beige.
Norman is not petite.
Eunice is not rational.
Jesse is not victorious.
Eunice is beige.
Morris is not beige.
Sophie is exuberant.
Norman is messy.If someone is either exuberant or beige, then he is not messy and not petite.
If all people are beige, then Eunice is petite.
Someone who is not exuberant is always both not victorious and rational.
Someone who is eithor victorious or beige is always not petite.
If there is someone who is either not petite or not beige, then Morris is not exuberant and Eunice is not victorious.
It can be concluded that Lincoln is not victorious and Joe is beige once knowing that Jesse is not exuberant and Morris is not messy.
If someone is not petite and victorious, then he is beige, and vice versa.
If someone is both not petite and beige, then he is not exuberant.
Someone who is not victorious is always not beige.
If there is someone who is not petite, then Morris is not rational.
It can be concluded that Sophie is rational and Jesse is not victorious once knowing that Lincoln is beige.
If Sophie is not rational or Sophie is not beige, then Jesse is not messy. | Jesse is not petite. | neutral |
Joe is beige.
Joe is victorious.
Jesse is not beige.
Morris is not petite.
Norman is beige.
Norman is not petite.
Eunice is not rational.
Jesse is not victorious.
Eunice is beige.
Morris is not beige.
Sophie is exuberant.
Norman is messy.If someone is either exuberant or beige, then he is not messy and not petite.
If all people are beige, then Eunice is petite.
Someone who is not exuberant is always both not victorious and rational.
Someone who is eithor victorious or beige is always not petite.
If there is someone who is either not petite or not beige, then Morris is not exuberant and Eunice is not victorious.
It can be concluded that Lincoln is not victorious and Joe is beige once knowing that Jesse is not exuberant and Morris is not messy.
If someone is not petite and victorious, then he is beige, and vice versa.
If someone is both not petite and beige, then he is not exuberant.
Someone who is not victorious is always not beige.
If there is someone who is not petite, then Morris is not rational.
It can be concluded that Sophie is rational and Jesse is not victorious once knowing that Lincoln is beige.
If Sophie is not rational or Sophie is not beige, then Jesse is not messy. | Norman is not messy. | self_contradiction |
Joe is beige.
Joe is victorious.
Jesse is not beige.
Morris is not petite.
Norman is beige.
Norman is not petite.
Eunice is not rational.
Jesse is not victorious.
Eunice is beige.
Morris is not beige.
Sophie is exuberant.
Norman is messy.If someone is either exuberant or beige, then he is not messy and not petite.
If all people are beige, then Eunice is petite.
Someone who is not exuberant is always both not victorious and rational.
Someone who is eithor victorious or beige is always not petite.
If there is someone who is either not petite or not beige, then Morris is not exuberant and Eunice is not victorious.
It can be concluded that Lincoln is not victorious and Joe is beige once knowing that Jesse is not exuberant and Morris is not messy.
If someone is not petite and victorious, then he is beige, and vice versa.
If someone is both not petite and beige, then he is not exuberant.
Someone who is not victorious is always not beige.
If there is someone who is not petite, then Morris is not rational.
It can be concluded that Sophie is rational and Jesse is not victorious once knowing that Lincoln is beige.
If Sophie is not rational or Sophie is not beige, then Jesse is not messy. | Eunice is petite. | contradiction |
Joe is beige.
Joe is victorious.
Jesse is not beige.
Morris is not petite.
Norman is beige.
Norman is not petite.
Eunice is not rational.
Jesse is not victorious.
Eunice is beige.
Morris is not beige.
Sophie is exuberant.
Norman is messy.If someone is either exuberant or beige, then he is not messy and not petite.
If all people are beige, then Eunice is petite.
Someone who is not exuberant is always both not victorious and rational.
Someone who is eithor victorious or beige is always not petite.
If there is someone who is either not petite or not beige, then Morris is not exuberant and Eunice is not victorious.
It can be concluded that Lincoln is not victorious and Joe is beige once knowing that Jesse is not exuberant and Morris is not messy.
If someone is not petite and victorious, then he is beige, and vice versa.
If someone is both not petite and beige, then he is not exuberant.
Someone who is not victorious is always not beige.
If there is someone who is not petite, then Morris is not rational.
It can be concluded that Sophie is rational and Jesse is not victorious once knowing that Lincoln is beige.
If Sophie is not rational or Sophie is not beige, then Jesse is not messy. | Jesse is rational. | neutral |
Joe is beige.
Joe is victorious.
Jesse is not beige.
Morris is not petite.
Norman is beige.
Norman is not petite.
Eunice is not rational.
Jesse is not victorious.
Eunice is beige.
Morris is not beige.
Sophie is exuberant.
Norman is messy.If someone is either exuberant or beige, then he is not messy and not petite.
If all people are beige, then Eunice is petite.
Someone who is not exuberant is always both not victorious and rational.
Someone who is eithor victorious or beige is always not petite.
If there is someone who is either not petite or not beige, then Morris is not exuberant and Eunice is not victorious.
It can be concluded that Lincoln is not victorious and Joe is beige once knowing that Jesse is not exuberant and Morris is not messy.
If someone is not petite and victorious, then he is beige, and vice versa.
If someone is both not petite and beige, then he is not exuberant.
Someone who is not victorious is always not beige.
If there is someone who is not petite, then Morris is not rational.
It can be concluded that Sophie is rational and Jesse is not victorious once knowing that Lincoln is beige.
If Sophie is not rational or Sophie is not beige, then Jesse is not messy. | Norman is victorious. | self_contradiction |
Joe is beige.
Joe is victorious.
Jesse is not beige.
Morris is not petite.
Norman is beige.
Norman is not petite.
Eunice is not rational.
Jesse is not victorious.
Eunice is beige.
Morris is not beige.
Sophie is exuberant.
Norman is messy.If someone is either exuberant or beige, then he is not messy and not petite.
If all people are beige, then Eunice is petite.
Someone who is not exuberant is always both not victorious and rational.
Someone who is eithor victorious or beige is always not petite.
If there is someone who is either not petite or not beige, then Morris is not exuberant and Eunice is not victorious.
It can be concluded that Lincoln is not victorious and Joe is beige once knowing that Jesse is not exuberant and Morris is not messy.
If someone is not petite and victorious, then he is beige, and vice versa.
If someone is both not petite and beige, then he is not exuberant.
Someone who is not victorious is always not beige.
If there is someone who is not petite, then Morris is not rational.
It can be concluded that Sophie is rational and Jesse is not victorious once knowing that Lincoln is beige.
If Sophie is not rational or Sophie is not beige, then Jesse is not messy. | Jesse is messy. | neutral |
Joe is beige.
Joe is victorious.
Jesse is not beige.
Morris is not petite.
Norman is beige.
Norman is not petite.
Eunice is not rational.
Jesse is not victorious.
Eunice is beige.
Morris is not beige.
Sophie is exuberant.
Norman is messy.If someone is either exuberant or beige, then he is not messy and not petite.
If all people are beige, then Eunice is petite.
Someone who is not exuberant is always both not victorious and rational.
Someone who is eithor victorious or beige is always not petite.
If there is someone who is either not petite or not beige, then Morris is not exuberant and Eunice is not victorious.
It can be concluded that Lincoln is not victorious and Joe is beige once knowing that Jesse is not exuberant and Morris is not messy.
If someone is not petite and victorious, then he is beige, and vice versa.
If someone is both not petite and beige, then he is not exuberant.
Someone who is not victorious is always not beige.
If there is someone who is not petite, then Morris is not rational.
It can be concluded that Sophie is rational and Jesse is not victorious once knowing that Lincoln is beige.
If Sophie is not rational or Sophie is not beige, then Jesse is not messy. | Norman is not exuberant. | entailment |
Joe is beige.
Joe is victorious.
Jesse is not beige.
Morris is not petite.
Norman is beige.
Norman is not petite.
Eunice is not rational.
Jesse is not victorious.
Eunice is beige.
Morris is not beige.
Sophie is exuberant.
Norman is messy.If someone is either exuberant or beige, then he is not messy and not petite.
If all people are beige, then Eunice is petite.
Someone who is not exuberant is always both not victorious and rational.
Someone who is eithor victorious or beige is always not petite.
If there is someone who is either not petite or not beige, then Morris is not exuberant and Eunice is not victorious.
It can be concluded that Lincoln is not victorious and Joe is beige once knowing that Jesse is not exuberant and Morris is not messy.
If someone is not petite and victorious, then he is beige, and vice versa.
If someone is both not petite and beige, then he is not exuberant.
Someone who is not victorious is always not beige.
If there is someone who is not petite, then Morris is not rational.
It can be concluded that Sophie is rational and Jesse is not victorious once knowing that Lincoln is beige.
If Sophie is not rational or Sophie is not beige, then Jesse is not messy. | Norman is not rational. | contradiction |
Joe is beige.
Joe is victorious.
Jesse is not beige.
Morris is not petite.
Norman is beige.
Norman is not petite.
Eunice is not rational.
Jesse is not victorious.
Eunice is beige.
Morris is not beige.
Sophie is exuberant.
Norman is messy.If someone is either exuberant or beige, then he is not messy and not petite.
If all people are beige, then Eunice is petite.
Someone who is not exuberant is always both not victorious and rational.
Someone who is eithor victorious or beige is always not petite.
If there is someone who is either not petite or not beige, then Morris is not exuberant and Eunice is not victorious.
It can be concluded that Lincoln is not victorious and Joe is beige once knowing that Jesse is not exuberant and Morris is not messy.
If someone is not petite and victorious, then he is beige, and vice versa.
If someone is both not petite and beige, then he is not exuberant.
Someone who is not victorious is always not beige.
If there is someone who is not petite, then Morris is not rational.
It can be concluded that Sophie is rational and Jesse is not victorious once knowing that Lincoln is beige.
If Sophie is not rational or Sophie is not beige, then Jesse is not messy. | Joe is rational. | entailment |
Joe is beige.
Joe is victorious.
Jesse is not beige.
Morris is not petite.
Norman is beige.
Norman is not petite.
Eunice is not rational.
Jesse is not victorious.
Eunice is beige.
Morris is not beige.
Sophie is exuberant.
Norman is messy.If someone is either exuberant or beige, then he is not messy and not petite.
If all people are beige, then Eunice is petite.
Someone who is not exuberant is always both not victorious and rational.
Someone who is eithor victorious or beige is always not petite.
If there is someone who is either not petite or not beige, then Morris is not exuberant and Eunice is not victorious.
It can be concluded that Lincoln is not victorious and Joe is beige once knowing that Jesse is not exuberant and Morris is not messy.
If someone is not petite and victorious, then he is beige, and vice versa.
If someone is both not petite and beige, then he is not exuberant.
Someone who is not victorious is always not beige.
If there is someone who is not petite, then Morris is not rational.
It can be concluded that Sophie is rational and Jesse is not victorious once knowing that Lincoln is beige.
If Sophie is not rational or Sophie is not beige, then Jesse is not messy. | Morris is petite. | contradiction |
Joe is beige.
Joe is victorious.
Jesse is not beige.
Morris is not petite.
Norman is beige.
Norman is not petite.
Eunice is not rational.
Jesse is not victorious.
Eunice is beige.
Morris is not beige.
Sophie is exuberant.
Norman is messy.If someone is either exuberant or beige, then he is not messy and not petite.
If all people are beige, then Eunice is petite.
Someone who is not exuberant is always both not victorious and rational.
Someone who is eithor victorious or beige is always not petite.
If there is someone who is either not petite or not beige, then Morris is not exuberant and Eunice is not victorious.
It can be concluded that Lincoln is not victorious and Joe is beige once knowing that Jesse is not exuberant and Morris is not messy.
If someone is not petite and victorious, then he is beige, and vice versa.
If someone is both not petite and beige, then he is not exuberant.
Someone who is not victorious is always not beige.
If there is someone who is not petite, then Morris is not rational.
It can be concluded that Sophie is rational and Jesse is not victorious once knowing that Lincoln is beige.
If Sophie is not rational or Sophie is not beige, then Jesse is not messy. | Eunice is not petite. | entailment |
Joe is beige.
Joe is victorious.
Jesse is not beige.
Morris is not petite.
Norman is beige.
Norman is not petite.
Eunice is not rational.
Jesse is not victorious.
Eunice is beige.
Morris is not beige.
Sophie is exuberant.
Norman is messy.If someone is either exuberant or beige, then he is not messy and not petite.
If all people are beige, then Eunice is petite.
Someone who is not exuberant is always both not victorious and rational.
Someone who is eithor victorious or beige is always not petite.
If there is someone who is either not petite or not beige, then Morris is not exuberant and Eunice is not victorious.
It can be concluded that Lincoln is not victorious and Joe is beige once knowing that Jesse is not exuberant and Morris is not messy.
If someone is not petite and victorious, then he is beige, and vice versa.
If someone is both not petite and beige, then he is not exuberant.
Someone who is not victorious is always not beige.
If there is someone who is not petite, then Morris is not rational.
It can be concluded that Sophie is rational and Jesse is not victorious once knowing that Lincoln is beige.
If Sophie is not rational or Sophie is not beige, then Jesse is not messy. | Jesse is not beige. | entailment |
Joe is beige.
Joe is victorious.
Jesse is not beige.
Morris is not petite.
Norman is beige.
Norman is not petite.
Eunice is not rational.
Jesse is not victorious.
Eunice is beige.
Morris is not beige.
Sophie is exuberant.
Norman is messy.If someone is either exuberant or beige, then he is not messy and not petite.
If all people are beige, then Eunice is petite.
Someone who is not exuberant is always both not victorious and rational.
Someone who is eithor victorious or beige is always not petite.
If there is someone who is either not petite or not beige, then Morris is not exuberant and Eunice is not victorious.
It can be concluded that Lincoln is not victorious and Joe is beige once knowing that Jesse is not exuberant and Morris is not messy.
If someone is not petite and victorious, then he is beige, and vice versa.
If someone is both not petite and beige, then he is not exuberant.
Someone who is not victorious is always not beige.
If there is someone who is not petite, then Morris is not rational.
It can be concluded that Sophie is rational and Jesse is not victorious once knowing that Lincoln is beige.
If Sophie is not rational or Sophie is not beige, then Jesse is not messy. | Morris is victorious. | contradiction |
Joe is beige.
Joe is victorious.
Jesse is not beige.
Morris is not petite.
Norman is beige.
Norman is not petite.
Eunice is not rational.
Jesse is not victorious.
Eunice is beige.
Morris is not beige.
Sophie is exuberant.
Norman is messy.If someone is either exuberant or beige, then he is not messy and not petite.
If all people are beige, then Eunice is petite.
Someone who is not exuberant is always both not victorious and rational.
Someone who is eithor victorious or beige is always not petite.
If there is someone who is either not petite or not beige, then Morris is not exuberant and Eunice is not victorious.
It can be concluded that Lincoln is not victorious and Joe is beige once knowing that Jesse is not exuberant and Morris is not messy.
If someone is not petite and victorious, then he is beige, and vice versa.
If someone is both not petite and beige, then he is not exuberant.
Someone who is not victorious is always not beige.
If there is someone who is not petite, then Morris is not rational.
It can be concluded that Sophie is rational and Jesse is not victorious once knowing that Lincoln is beige.
If Sophie is not rational or Sophie is not beige, then Jesse is not messy. | Joe is victorious. | self_contradiction |
Curtis is eastern.
Aiken is not creepy.
Aiken is fresh.
Curtis is not sane.
Lucy is happy.
Lucy is not fresh.
Austin is not creepy.
Hall is eastern.
Channing is happy.
Aiken is not various.
Austin is various.
Aiken is not happy.If Curtis is sane and Austin is not happy, then Curtis is eastern.
If someone is not creepy, then he is not various.
Someone who is not creepy or not sane is always happy and various.
Curtis being not sane implies that Sterling is various.
If someone is not sane, then he is various.
If everyone is eastern, then Aiken is various.
If everyone is happy, then Sterling is not eastern and Austin is not sane.
If Curtis is not eastern, then Hall is fresh.
Channing is various if and only if Hall is eastern.
Someone is various and not fresh if and only if he is not sane.
If there is someone who is not various, then Austin is not happy.
Someone who is both not various and not eastern is always not creepy. | Aiken is not various. | self_contradiction |
Curtis is eastern.
Aiken is not creepy.
Aiken is fresh.
Curtis is not sane.
Lucy is happy.
Lucy is not fresh.
Austin is not creepy.
Hall is eastern.
Channing is happy.
Aiken is not various.
Austin is various.
Aiken is not happy.If Curtis is sane and Austin is not happy, then Curtis is eastern.
If someone is not creepy, then he is not various.
Someone who is not creepy or not sane is always happy and various.
Curtis being not sane implies that Sterling is various.
If someone is not sane, then he is various.
If everyone is eastern, then Aiken is various.
If everyone is happy, then Sterling is not eastern and Austin is not sane.
If Curtis is not eastern, then Hall is fresh.
Channing is various if and only if Hall is eastern.
Someone is various and not fresh if and only if he is not sane.
If there is someone who is not various, then Austin is not happy.
Someone who is both not various and not eastern is always not creepy. | Hall is not happy. | neutral |
Curtis is eastern.
Aiken is not creepy.
Aiken is fresh.
Curtis is not sane.
Lucy is happy.
Lucy is not fresh.
Austin is not creepy.
Hall is eastern.
Channing is happy.
Aiken is not various.
Austin is various.
Aiken is not happy.If Curtis is sane and Austin is not happy, then Curtis is eastern.
If someone is not creepy, then he is not various.
Someone who is not creepy or not sane is always happy and various.
Curtis being not sane implies that Sterling is various.
If someone is not sane, then he is various.
If everyone is eastern, then Aiken is various.
If everyone is happy, then Sterling is not eastern and Austin is not sane.
If Curtis is not eastern, then Hall is fresh.
Channing is various if and only if Hall is eastern.
Someone is various and not fresh if and only if he is not sane.
If there is someone who is not various, then Austin is not happy.
Someone who is both not various and not eastern is always not creepy. | Austin is creepy. | contradiction |
Curtis is eastern.
Aiken is not creepy.
Aiken is fresh.
Curtis is not sane.
Lucy is happy.
Lucy is not fresh.
Austin is not creepy.
Hall is eastern.
Channing is happy.
Aiken is not various.
Austin is various.
Aiken is not happy.If Curtis is sane and Austin is not happy, then Curtis is eastern.
If someone is not creepy, then he is not various.
Someone who is not creepy or not sane is always happy and various.
Curtis being not sane implies that Sterling is various.
If someone is not sane, then he is various.
If everyone is eastern, then Aiken is various.
If everyone is happy, then Sterling is not eastern and Austin is not sane.
If Curtis is not eastern, then Hall is fresh.
Channing is various if and only if Hall is eastern.
Someone is various and not fresh if and only if he is not sane.
If there is someone who is not various, then Austin is not happy.
Someone who is both not various and not eastern is always not creepy. | Aiken is not happy. | self_contradiction |
Curtis is eastern.
Aiken is not creepy.
Aiken is fresh.
Curtis is not sane.
Lucy is happy.
Lucy is not fresh.
Austin is not creepy.
Hall is eastern.
Channing is happy.
Aiken is not various.
Austin is various.
Aiken is not happy.If Curtis is sane and Austin is not happy, then Curtis is eastern.
If someone is not creepy, then he is not various.
Someone who is not creepy or not sane is always happy and various.
Curtis being not sane implies that Sterling is various.
If someone is not sane, then he is various.
If everyone is eastern, then Aiken is various.
If everyone is happy, then Sterling is not eastern and Austin is not sane.
If Curtis is not eastern, then Hall is fresh.
Channing is various if and only if Hall is eastern.
Someone is various and not fresh if and only if he is not sane.
If there is someone who is not various, then Austin is not happy.
Someone who is both not various and not eastern is always not creepy. | Hall is not sane. | neutral |
Curtis is eastern.
Aiken is not creepy.
Aiken is fresh.
Curtis is not sane.
Lucy is happy.
Lucy is not fresh.
Austin is not creepy.
Hall is eastern.
Channing is happy.
Aiken is not various.
Austin is various.
Aiken is not happy.If Curtis is sane and Austin is not happy, then Curtis is eastern.
If someone is not creepy, then he is not various.
Someone who is not creepy or not sane is always happy and various.
Curtis being not sane implies that Sterling is various.
If someone is not sane, then he is various.
If everyone is eastern, then Aiken is various.
If everyone is happy, then Sterling is not eastern and Austin is not sane.
If Curtis is not eastern, then Hall is fresh.
Channing is various if and only if Hall is eastern.
Someone is various and not fresh if and only if he is not sane.
If there is someone who is not various, then Austin is not happy.
Someone who is both not various and not eastern is always not creepy. | Austin is not creepy. | entailment |
Curtis is eastern.
Aiken is not creepy.
Aiken is fresh.
Curtis is not sane.
Lucy is happy.
Lucy is not fresh.
Austin is not creepy.
Hall is eastern.
Channing is happy.
Aiken is not various.
Austin is various.
Aiken is not happy.If Curtis is sane and Austin is not happy, then Curtis is eastern.
If someone is not creepy, then he is not various.
Someone who is not creepy or not sane is always happy and various.
Curtis being not sane implies that Sterling is various.
If someone is not sane, then he is various.
If everyone is eastern, then Aiken is various.
If everyone is happy, then Sterling is not eastern and Austin is not sane.
If Curtis is not eastern, then Hall is fresh.
Channing is various if and only if Hall is eastern.
Someone is various and not fresh if and only if he is not sane.
If there is someone who is not various, then Austin is not happy.
Someone who is both not various and not eastern is always not creepy. | Channing is not various. | contradiction |
Curtis is eastern.
Aiken is not creepy.
Aiken is fresh.
Curtis is not sane.
Lucy is happy.
Lucy is not fresh.
Austin is not creepy.
Hall is eastern.
Channing is happy.
Aiken is not various.
Austin is various.
Aiken is not happy.If Curtis is sane and Austin is not happy, then Curtis is eastern.
If someone is not creepy, then he is not various.
Someone who is not creepy or not sane is always happy and various.
Curtis being not sane implies that Sterling is various.
If someone is not sane, then he is various.
If everyone is eastern, then Aiken is various.
If everyone is happy, then Sterling is not eastern and Austin is not sane.
If Curtis is not eastern, then Hall is fresh.
Channing is various if and only if Hall is eastern.
Someone is various and not fresh if and only if he is not sane.
If there is someone who is not various, then Austin is not happy.
Someone who is both not various and not eastern is always not creepy. | Aiken is happy. | self_contradiction |
Curtis is eastern.
Aiken is not creepy.
Aiken is fresh.
Curtis is not sane.
Lucy is happy.
Lucy is not fresh.
Austin is not creepy.
Hall is eastern.
Channing is happy.
Aiken is not various.
Austin is various.
Aiken is not happy.If Curtis is sane and Austin is not happy, then Curtis is eastern.
If someone is not creepy, then he is not various.
Someone who is not creepy or not sane is always happy and various.
Curtis being not sane implies that Sterling is various.
If someone is not sane, then he is various.
If everyone is eastern, then Aiken is various.
If everyone is happy, then Sterling is not eastern and Austin is not sane.
If Curtis is not eastern, then Hall is fresh.
Channing is various if and only if Hall is eastern.
Someone is various and not fresh if and only if he is not sane.
If there is someone who is not various, then Austin is not happy.
Someone who is both not various and not eastern is always not creepy. | Curtis is sane. | contradiction |
Curtis is eastern.
Aiken is not creepy.
Aiken is fresh.
Curtis is not sane.
Lucy is happy.
Lucy is not fresh.
Austin is not creepy.
Hall is eastern.
Channing is happy.
Aiken is not various.
Austin is various.
Aiken is not happy.If Curtis is sane and Austin is not happy, then Curtis is eastern.
If someone is not creepy, then he is not various.
Someone who is not creepy or not sane is always happy and various.
Curtis being not sane implies that Sterling is various.
If someone is not sane, then he is various.
If everyone is eastern, then Aiken is various.
If everyone is happy, then Sterling is not eastern and Austin is not sane.
If Curtis is not eastern, then Hall is fresh.
Channing is various if and only if Hall is eastern.
Someone is various and not fresh if and only if he is not sane.
If there is someone who is not various, then Austin is not happy.
Someone who is both not various and not eastern is always not creepy. | Curtis is not fresh. | entailment |
Curtis is eastern.
Aiken is not creepy.
Aiken is fresh.
Curtis is not sane.
Lucy is happy.
Lucy is not fresh.
Austin is not creepy.
Hall is eastern.
Channing is happy.
Aiken is not various.
Austin is various.
Aiken is not happy.If Curtis is sane and Austin is not happy, then Curtis is eastern.
If someone is not creepy, then he is not various.
Someone who is not creepy or not sane is always happy and various.
Curtis being not sane implies that Sterling is various.
If someone is not sane, then he is various.
If everyone is eastern, then Aiken is various.
If everyone is happy, then Sterling is not eastern and Austin is not sane.
If Curtis is not eastern, then Hall is fresh.
Channing is various if and only if Hall is eastern.
Someone is various and not fresh if and only if he is not sane.
If there is someone who is not various, then Austin is not happy.
Someone who is both not various and not eastern is always not creepy. | Austin is happy. | self_contradiction |
Curtis is eastern.
Aiken is not creepy.
Aiken is fresh.
Curtis is not sane.
Lucy is happy.
Lucy is not fresh.
Austin is not creepy.
Hall is eastern.
Channing is happy.
Aiken is not various.
Austin is various.
Aiken is not happy.If Curtis is sane and Austin is not happy, then Curtis is eastern.
If someone is not creepy, then he is not various.
Someone who is not creepy or not sane is always happy and various.
Curtis being not sane implies that Sterling is various.
If someone is not sane, then he is various.
If everyone is eastern, then Aiken is various.
If everyone is happy, then Sterling is not eastern and Austin is not sane.
If Curtis is not eastern, then Hall is fresh.
Channing is various if and only if Hall is eastern.
Someone is various and not fresh if and only if he is not sane.
If there is someone who is not various, then Austin is not happy.
Someone who is both not various and not eastern is always not creepy. | Channing is various. | entailment |
Curtis is eastern.
Aiken is not creepy.
Aiken is fresh.
Curtis is not sane.
Lucy is happy.
Lucy is not fresh.
Austin is not creepy.
Hall is eastern.
Channing is happy.
Aiken is not various.
Austin is various.
Aiken is not happy.If Curtis is sane and Austin is not happy, then Curtis is eastern.
If someone is not creepy, then he is not various.
Someone who is not creepy or not sane is always happy and various.
Curtis being not sane implies that Sterling is various.
If someone is not sane, then he is various.
If everyone is eastern, then Aiken is various.
If everyone is happy, then Sterling is not eastern and Austin is not sane.
If Curtis is not eastern, then Hall is fresh.
Channing is various if and only if Hall is eastern.
Someone is various and not fresh if and only if he is not sane.
If there is someone who is not various, then Austin is not happy.
Someone who is both not various and not eastern is always not creepy. | Austin is various. | self_contradiction |
Curtis is eastern.
Aiken is not creepy.
Aiken is fresh.
Curtis is not sane.
Lucy is happy.
Lucy is not fresh.
Austin is not creepy.
Hall is eastern.
Channing is happy.
Aiken is not various.
Austin is various.
Aiken is not happy.If Curtis is sane and Austin is not happy, then Curtis is eastern.
If someone is not creepy, then he is not various.
Someone who is not creepy or not sane is always happy and various.
Curtis being not sane implies that Sterling is various.
If someone is not sane, then he is various.
If everyone is eastern, then Aiken is various.
If everyone is happy, then Sterling is not eastern and Austin is not sane.
If Curtis is not eastern, then Hall is fresh.
Channing is various if and only if Hall is eastern.
Someone is various and not fresh if and only if he is not sane.
If there is someone who is not various, then Austin is not happy.
Someone who is both not various and not eastern is always not creepy. | Sterling is not various. | contradiction |
Curtis is eastern.
Aiken is not creepy.
Aiken is fresh.
Curtis is not sane.
Lucy is happy.
Lucy is not fresh.
Austin is not creepy.
Hall is eastern.
Channing is happy.
Aiken is not various.
Austin is various.
Aiken is not happy.If Curtis is sane and Austin is not happy, then Curtis is eastern.
If someone is not creepy, then he is not various.
Someone who is not creepy or not sane is always happy and various.
Curtis being not sane implies that Sterling is various.
If someone is not sane, then he is various.
If everyone is eastern, then Aiken is various.
If everyone is happy, then Sterling is not eastern and Austin is not sane.
If Curtis is not eastern, then Hall is fresh.
Channing is various if and only if Hall is eastern.
Someone is various and not fresh if and only if he is not sane.
If there is someone who is not various, then Austin is not happy.
Someone who is both not various and not eastern is always not creepy. | Lucy is creepy. | neutral |
Curtis is eastern.
Aiken is not creepy.
Aiken is fresh.
Curtis is not sane.
Lucy is happy.
Lucy is not fresh.
Austin is not creepy.
Hall is eastern.
Channing is happy.
Aiken is not various.
Austin is various.
Aiken is not happy.If Curtis is sane and Austin is not happy, then Curtis is eastern.
If someone is not creepy, then he is not various.
Someone who is not creepy or not sane is always happy and various.
Curtis being not sane implies that Sterling is various.
If someone is not sane, then he is various.
If everyone is eastern, then Aiken is various.
If everyone is happy, then Sterling is not eastern and Austin is not sane.
If Curtis is not eastern, then Hall is fresh.
Channing is various if and only if Hall is eastern.
Someone is various and not fresh if and only if he is not sane.
If there is someone who is not various, then Austin is not happy.
Someone who is both not various and not eastern is always not creepy. | Curtis is happy. | entailment |
Curtis is eastern.
Aiken is not creepy.
Aiken is fresh.
Curtis is not sane.
Lucy is happy.
Lucy is not fresh.
Austin is not creepy.
Hall is eastern.
Channing is happy.
Aiken is not various.
Austin is various.
Aiken is not happy.If Curtis is sane and Austin is not happy, then Curtis is eastern.
If someone is not creepy, then he is not various.
Someone who is not creepy or not sane is always happy and various.
Curtis being not sane implies that Sterling is various.
If someone is not sane, then he is various.
If everyone is eastern, then Aiken is various.
If everyone is happy, then Sterling is not eastern and Austin is not sane.
If Curtis is not eastern, then Hall is fresh.
Channing is various if and only if Hall is eastern.
Someone is various and not fresh if and only if he is not sane.
If there is someone who is not various, then Austin is not happy.
Someone who is both not various and not eastern is always not creepy. | Sterling is creepy. | neutral |
Curtis is eastern.
Aiken is not creepy.
Aiken is fresh.
Curtis is not sane.
Lucy is happy.
Lucy is not fresh.
Austin is not creepy.
Hall is eastern.
Channing is happy.
Aiken is not various.
Austin is various.
Aiken is not happy.If Curtis is sane and Austin is not happy, then Curtis is eastern.
If someone is not creepy, then he is not various.
Someone who is not creepy or not sane is always happy and various.
Curtis being not sane implies that Sterling is various.
If someone is not sane, then he is various.
If everyone is eastern, then Aiken is various.
If everyone is happy, then Sterling is not eastern and Austin is not sane.
If Curtis is not eastern, then Hall is fresh.
Channing is various if and only if Hall is eastern.
Someone is various and not fresh if and only if he is not sane.
If there is someone who is not various, then Austin is not happy.
Someone who is both not various and not eastern is always not creepy. | Lucy is fresh. | contradiction |
Curtis is eastern.
Aiken is not creepy.
Aiken is fresh.
Curtis is not sane.
Lucy is happy.
Lucy is not fresh.
Austin is not creepy.
Hall is eastern.
Channing is happy.
Aiken is not various.
Austin is various.
Aiken is not happy.If Curtis is sane and Austin is not happy, then Curtis is eastern.
If someone is not creepy, then he is not various.
Someone who is not creepy or not sane is always happy and various.
Curtis being not sane implies that Sterling is various.
If someone is not sane, then he is various.
If everyone is eastern, then Aiken is various.
If everyone is happy, then Sterling is not eastern and Austin is not sane.
If Curtis is not eastern, then Hall is fresh.
Channing is various if and only if Hall is eastern.
Someone is various and not fresh if and only if he is not sane.
If there is someone who is not various, then Austin is not happy.
Someone who is both not various and not eastern is always not creepy. | Channing is sane. | neutral |
Curtis is eastern.
Aiken is not creepy.
Aiken is fresh.
Curtis is not sane.
Lucy is happy.
Lucy is not fresh.
Austin is not creepy.
Hall is eastern.
Channing is happy.
Aiken is not various.
Austin is various.
Aiken is not happy.If Curtis is sane and Austin is not happy, then Curtis is eastern.
If someone is not creepy, then he is not various.
Someone who is not creepy or not sane is always happy and various.
Curtis being not sane implies that Sterling is various.
If someone is not sane, then he is various.
If everyone is eastern, then Aiken is various.
If everyone is happy, then Sterling is not eastern and Austin is not sane.
If Curtis is not eastern, then Hall is fresh.
Channing is various if and only if Hall is eastern.
Someone is various and not fresh if and only if he is not sane.
If there is someone who is not various, then Austin is not happy.
Someone who is both not various and not eastern is always not creepy. | Curtis is eastern. | entailment |
Hardy is typical.
Hardy is not reliable.
Stanley is hard-working.
Hardy is not obedient.
Shawn is hard-working.
Stanley is not hungry.
Goddard is obedient.
Gideon is not consistent.
Tobias is not hungry.
Hardy is not hungry.
Isaiah is consistent.
Isaiah is not hard-working.Shawn being consistent and Shawn being not hard-working imply that Stanley is not obedient.
Stanley is consistent if and only if Isaiah is not hard-working.
Someone is consistent if and only if he is reliable.
Shawn is not reliable if and only if Stanley is not hard-working and Shawn is not typical.
If there is someone who is both not reliable and not typical, then Hardy is not hungry.
Someone is consistent if and only if he is not obedient.
Hardy being reliable is equivalent to Isaiah being hungry.
Someone who is not obedient is always both not typical and not consistent.
Hardy being hungry and Gideon being not reliable imply that Isaiah is not consistent.
Gideon being obedient and Goddard being typical imply that Shawn is not consistent and Stanley is reliable.
If there is someone who is both not hungry and not typical, then Shawn is obedient.
Tobias being typical and Shawn being not consistent imply that Shawn is reliable. | Tobias is not typical. | neutral |
Hardy is typical.
Hardy is not reliable.
Stanley is hard-working.
Hardy is not obedient.
Shawn is hard-working.
Stanley is not hungry.
Goddard is obedient.
Gideon is not consistent.
Tobias is not hungry.
Hardy is not hungry.
Isaiah is consistent.
Isaiah is not hard-working.Shawn being consistent and Shawn being not hard-working imply that Stanley is not obedient.
Stanley is consistent if and only if Isaiah is not hard-working.
Someone is consistent if and only if he is reliable.
Shawn is not reliable if and only if Stanley is not hard-working and Shawn is not typical.
If there is someone who is both not reliable and not typical, then Hardy is not hungry.
Someone is consistent if and only if he is not obedient.
Hardy being reliable is equivalent to Isaiah being hungry.
Someone who is not obedient is always both not typical and not consistent.
Hardy being hungry and Gideon being not reliable imply that Isaiah is not consistent.
Gideon being obedient and Goddard being typical imply that Shawn is not consistent and Stanley is reliable.
If there is someone who is both not hungry and not typical, then Shawn is obedient.
Tobias being typical and Shawn being not consistent imply that Shawn is reliable. | Isaiah is not reliable. | contradiction |
Hardy is typical.
Hardy is not reliable.
Stanley is hard-working.
Hardy is not obedient.
Shawn is hard-working.
Stanley is not hungry.
Goddard is obedient.
Gideon is not consistent.
Tobias is not hungry.
Hardy is not hungry.
Isaiah is consistent.
Isaiah is not hard-working.Shawn being consistent and Shawn being not hard-working imply that Stanley is not obedient.
Stanley is consistent if and only if Isaiah is not hard-working.
Someone is consistent if and only if he is reliable.
Shawn is not reliable if and only if Stanley is not hard-working and Shawn is not typical.
If there is someone who is both not reliable and not typical, then Hardy is not hungry.
Someone is consistent if and only if he is not obedient.
Hardy being reliable is equivalent to Isaiah being hungry.
Someone who is not obedient is always both not typical and not consistent.
Hardy being hungry and Gideon being not reliable imply that Isaiah is not consistent.
Gideon being obedient and Goddard being typical imply that Shawn is not consistent and Stanley is reliable.
If there is someone who is both not hungry and not typical, then Shawn is obedient.
Tobias being typical and Shawn being not consistent imply that Shawn is reliable. | Shawn is not obedient. | contradiction |
Hardy is typical.
Hardy is not reliable.
Stanley is hard-working.
Hardy is not obedient.
Shawn is hard-working.
Stanley is not hungry.
Goddard is obedient.
Gideon is not consistent.
Tobias is not hungry.
Hardy is not hungry.
Isaiah is consistent.
Isaiah is not hard-working.Shawn being consistent and Shawn being not hard-working imply that Stanley is not obedient.
Stanley is consistent if and only if Isaiah is not hard-working.
Someone is consistent if and only if he is reliable.
Shawn is not reliable if and only if Stanley is not hard-working and Shawn is not typical.
If there is someone who is both not reliable and not typical, then Hardy is not hungry.
Someone is consistent if and only if he is not obedient.
Hardy being reliable is equivalent to Isaiah being hungry.
Someone who is not obedient is always both not typical and not consistent.
Hardy being hungry and Gideon being not reliable imply that Isaiah is not consistent.
Gideon being obedient and Goddard being typical imply that Shawn is not consistent and Stanley is reliable.
If there is someone who is both not hungry and not typical, then Shawn is obedient.
Tobias being typical and Shawn being not consistent imply that Shawn is reliable. | Hardy is not reliable. | self_contradiction |
Hardy is typical.
Hardy is not reliable.
Stanley is hard-working.
Hardy is not obedient.
Shawn is hard-working.
Stanley is not hungry.
Goddard is obedient.
Gideon is not consistent.
Tobias is not hungry.
Hardy is not hungry.
Isaiah is consistent.
Isaiah is not hard-working.Shawn being consistent and Shawn being not hard-working imply that Stanley is not obedient.
Stanley is consistent if and only if Isaiah is not hard-working.
Someone is consistent if and only if he is reliable.
Shawn is not reliable if and only if Stanley is not hard-working and Shawn is not typical.
If there is someone who is both not reliable and not typical, then Hardy is not hungry.
Someone is consistent if and only if he is not obedient.
Hardy being reliable is equivalent to Isaiah being hungry.
Someone who is not obedient is always both not typical and not consistent.
Hardy being hungry and Gideon being not reliable imply that Isaiah is not consistent.
Gideon being obedient and Goddard being typical imply that Shawn is not consistent and Stanley is reliable.
If there is someone who is both not hungry and not typical, then Shawn is obedient.
Tobias being typical and Shawn being not consistent imply that Shawn is reliable. | Hardy is typical. | self_contradiction |
Hardy is typical.
Hardy is not reliable.
Stanley is hard-working.
Hardy is not obedient.
Shawn is hard-working.
Stanley is not hungry.
Goddard is obedient.
Gideon is not consistent.
Tobias is not hungry.
Hardy is not hungry.
Isaiah is consistent.
Isaiah is not hard-working.Shawn being consistent and Shawn being not hard-working imply that Stanley is not obedient.
Stanley is consistent if and only if Isaiah is not hard-working.
Someone is consistent if and only if he is reliable.
Shawn is not reliable if and only if Stanley is not hard-working and Shawn is not typical.
If there is someone who is both not reliable and not typical, then Hardy is not hungry.
Someone is consistent if and only if he is not obedient.
Hardy being reliable is equivalent to Isaiah being hungry.
Someone who is not obedient is always both not typical and not consistent.
Hardy being hungry and Gideon being not reliable imply that Isaiah is not consistent.
Gideon being obedient and Goddard being typical imply that Shawn is not consistent and Stanley is reliable.
If there is someone who is both not hungry and not typical, then Shawn is obedient.
Tobias being typical and Shawn being not consistent imply that Shawn is reliable. | Goddard is obedient. | entailment |
Hardy is typical.
Hardy is not reliable.
Stanley is hard-working.
Hardy is not obedient.
Shawn is hard-working.
Stanley is not hungry.
Goddard is obedient.
Gideon is not consistent.
Tobias is not hungry.
Hardy is not hungry.
Isaiah is consistent.
Isaiah is not hard-working.Shawn being consistent and Shawn being not hard-working imply that Stanley is not obedient.
Stanley is consistent if and only if Isaiah is not hard-working.
Someone is consistent if and only if he is reliable.
Shawn is not reliable if and only if Stanley is not hard-working and Shawn is not typical.
If there is someone who is both not reliable and not typical, then Hardy is not hungry.
Someone is consistent if and only if he is not obedient.
Hardy being reliable is equivalent to Isaiah being hungry.
Someone who is not obedient is always both not typical and not consistent.
Hardy being hungry and Gideon being not reliable imply that Isaiah is not consistent.
Gideon being obedient and Goddard being typical imply that Shawn is not consistent and Stanley is reliable.
If there is someone who is both not hungry and not typical, then Shawn is obedient.
Tobias being typical and Shawn being not consistent imply that Shawn is reliable. | Isaiah is not obedient. | entailment |
Hardy is typical.
Hardy is not reliable.
Stanley is hard-working.
Hardy is not obedient.
Shawn is hard-working.
Stanley is not hungry.
Goddard is obedient.
Gideon is not consistent.
Tobias is not hungry.
Hardy is not hungry.
Isaiah is consistent.
Isaiah is not hard-working.Shawn being consistent and Shawn being not hard-working imply that Stanley is not obedient.
Stanley is consistent if and only if Isaiah is not hard-working.
Someone is consistent if and only if he is reliable.
Shawn is not reliable if and only if Stanley is not hard-working and Shawn is not typical.
If there is someone who is both not reliable and not typical, then Hardy is not hungry.
Someone is consistent if and only if he is not obedient.
Hardy being reliable is equivalent to Isaiah being hungry.
Someone who is not obedient is always both not typical and not consistent.
Hardy being hungry and Gideon being not reliable imply that Isaiah is not consistent.
Gideon being obedient and Goddard being typical imply that Shawn is not consistent and Stanley is reliable.
If there is someone who is both not hungry and not typical, then Shawn is obedient.
Tobias being typical and Shawn being not consistent imply that Shawn is reliable. | Tobias is obedient. | neutral |
Hardy is typical.
Hardy is not reliable.
Stanley is hard-working.
Hardy is not obedient.
Shawn is hard-working.
Stanley is not hungry.
Goddard is obedient.
Gideon is not consistent.
Tobias is not hungry.
Hardy is not hungry.
Isaiah is consistent.
Isaiah is not hard-working.Shawn being consistent and Shawn being not hard-working imply that Stanley is not obedient.
Stanley is consistent if and only if Isaiah is not hard-working.
Someone is consistent if and only if he is reliable.
Shawn is not reliable if and only if Stanley is not hard-working and Shawn is not typical.
If there is someone who is both not reliable and not typical, then Hardy is not hungry.
Someone is consistent if and only if he is not obedient.
Hardy being reliable is equivalent to Isaiah being hungry.
Someone who is not obedient is always both not typical and not consistent.
Hardy being hungry and Gideon being not reliable imply that Isaiah is not consistent.
Gideon being obedient and Goddard being typical imply that Shawn is not consistent and Stanley is reliable.
If there is someone who is both not hungry and not typical, then Shawn is obedient.
Tobias being typical and Shawn being not consistent imply that Shawn is reliable. | Isaiah is hard-working. | contradiction |
Hardy is typical.
Hardy is not reliable.
Stanley is hard-working.
Hardy is not obedient.
Shawn is hard-working.
Stanley is not hungry.
Goddard is obedient.
Gideon is not consistent.
Tobias is not hungry.
Hardy is not hungry.
Isaiah is consistent.
Isaiah is not hard-working.Shawn being consistent and Shawn being not hard-working imply that Stanley is not obedient.
Stanley is consistent if and only if Isaiah is not hard-working.
Someone is consistent if and only if he is reliable.
Shawn is not reliable if and only if Stanley is not hard-working and Shawn is not typical.
If there is someone who is both not reliable and not typical, then Hardy is not hungry.
Someone is consistent if and only if he is not obedient.
Hardy being reliable is equivalent to Isaiah being hungry.
Someone who is not obedient is always both not typical and not consistent.
Hardy being hungry and Gideon being not reliable imply that Isaiah is not consistent.
Gideon being obedient and Goddard being typical imply that Shawn is not consistent and Stanley is reliable.
If there is someone who is both not hungry and not typical, then Shawn is obedient.
Tobias being typical and Shawn being not consistent imply that Shawn is reliable. | Goddard is not typical. | neutral |
Hardy is typical.
Hardy is not reliable.
Stanley is hard-working.
Hardy is not obedient.
Shawn is hard-working.
Stanley is not hungry.
Goddard is obedient.
Gideon is not consistent.
Tobias is not hungry.
Hardy is not hungry.
Isaiah is consistent.
Isaiah is not hard-working.Shawn being consistent and Shawn being not hard-working imply that Stanley is not obedient.
Stanley is consistent if and only if Isaiah is not hard-working.
Someone is consistent if and only if he is reliable.
Shawn is not reliable if and only if Stanley is not hard-working and Shawn is not typical.
If there is someone who is both not reliable and not typical, then Hardy is not hungry.
Someone is consistent if and only if he is not obedient.
Hardy being reliable is equivalent to Isaiah being hungry.
Someone who is not obedient is always both not typical and not consistent.
Hardy being hungry and Gideon being not reliable imply that Isaiah is not consistent.
Gideon being obedient and Goddard being typical imply that Shawn is not consistent and Stanley is reliable.
If there is someone who is both not hungry and not typical, then Shawn is obedient.
Tobias being typical and Shawn being not consistent imply that Shawn is reliable. | Isaiah is not typical. | entailment |
Hardy is typical.
Hardy is not reliable.
Stanley is hard-working.
Hardy is not obedient.
Shawn is hard-working.
Stanley is not hungry.
Goddard is obedient.
Gideon is not consistent.
Tobias is not hungry.
Hardy is not hungry.
Isaiah is consistent.
Isaiah is not hard-working.Shawn being consistent and Shawn being not hard-working imply that Stanley is not obedient.
Stanley is consistent if and only if Isaiah is not hard-working.
Someone is consistent if and only if he is reliable.
Shawn is not reliable if and only if Stanley is not hard-working and Shawn is not typical.
If there is someone who is both not reliable and not typical, then Hardy is not hungry.
Someone is consistent if and only if he is not obedient.
Hardy being reliable is equivalent to Isaiah being hungry.
Someone who is not obedient is always both not typical and not consistent.
Hardy being hungry and Gideon being not reliable imply that Isaiah is not consistent.
Gideon being obedient and Goddard being typical imply that Shawn is not consistent and Stanley is reliable.
If there is someone who is both not hungry and not typical, then Shawn is obedient.
Tobias being typical and Shawn being not consistent imply that Shawn is reliable. | Hardy is consistent. | self_contradiction |
Hardy is typical.
Hardy is not reliable.
Stanley is hard-working.
Hardy is not obedient.
Shawn is hard-working.
Stanley is not hungry.
Goddard is obedient.
Gideon is not consistent.
Tobias is not hungry.
Hardy is not hungry.
Isaiah is consistent.
Isaiah is not hard-working.Shawn being consistent and Shawn being not hard-working imply that Stanley is not obedient.
Stanley is consistent if and only if Isaiah is not hard-working.
Someone is consistent if and only if he is reliable.
Shawn is not reliable if and only if Stanley is not hard-working and Shawn is not typical.
If there is someone who is both not reliable and not typical, then Hardy is not hungry.
Someone is consistent if and only if he is not obedient.
Hardy being reliable is equivalent to Isaiah being hungry.
Someone who is not obedient is always both not typical and not consistent.
Hardy being hungry and Gideon being not reliable imply that Isaiah is not consistent.
Gideon being obedient and Goddard being typical imply that Shawn is not consistent and Stanley is reliable.
If there is someone who is both not hungry and not typical, then Shawn is obedient.
Tobias being typical and Shawn being not consistent imply that Shawn is reliable. | Hardy is not typical. | self_contradiction |
Hardy is typical.
Hardy is not reliable.
Stanley is hard-working.
Hardy is not obedient.
Shawn is hard-working.
Stanley is not hungry.
Goddard is obedient.
Gideon is not consistent.
Tobias is not hungry.
Hardy is not hungry.
Isaiah is consistent.
Isaiah is not hard-working.Shawn being consistent and Shawn being not hard-working imply that Stanley is not obedient.
Stanley is consistent if and only if Isaiah is not hard-working.
Someone is consistent if and only if he is reliable.
Shawn is not reliable if and only if Stanley is not hard-working and Shawn is not typical.
If there is someone who is both not reliable and not typical, then Hardy is not hungry.
Someone is consistent if and only if he is not obedient.
Hardy being reliable is equivalent to Isaiah being hungry.
Someone who is not obedient is always both not typical and not consistent.
Hardy being hungry and Gideon being not reliable imply that Isaiah is not consistent.
Gideon being obedient and Goddard being typical imply that Shawn is not consistent and Stanley is reliable.
If there is someone who is both not hungry and not typical, then Shawn is obedient.
Tobias being typical and Shawn being not consistent imply that Shawn is reliable. | Hardy is not consistent. | self_contradiction |
Hardy is typical.
Hardy is not reliable.
Stanley is hard-working.
Hardy is not obedient.
Shawn is hard-working.
Stanley is not hungry.
Goddard is obedient.
Gideon is not consistent.
Tobias is not hungry.
Hardy is not hungry.
Isaiah is consistent.
Isaiah is not hard-working.Shawn being consistent and Shawn being not hard-working imply that Stanley is not obedient.
Stanley is consistent if and only if Isaiah is not hard-working.
Someone is consistent if and only if he is reliable.
Shawn is not reliable if and only if Stanley is not hard-working and Shawn is not typical.
If there is someone who is both not reliable and not typical, then Hardy is not hungry.
Someone is consistent if and only if he is not obedient.
Hardy being reliable is equivalent to Isaiah being hungry.
Someone who is not obedient is always both not typical and not consistent.
Hardy being hungry and Gideon being not reliable imply that Isaiah is not consistent.
Gideon being obedient and Goddard being typical imply that Shawn is not consistent and Stanley is reliable.
If there is someone who is both not hungry and not typical, then Shawn is obedient.
Tobias being typical and Shawn being not consistent imply that Shawn is reliable. | Hardy is obedient. | contradiction |
Hardy is typical.
Hardy is not reliable.
Stanley is hard-working.
Hardy is not obedient.
Shawn is hard-working.
Stanley is not hungry.
Goddard is obedient.
Gideon is not consistent.
Tobias is not hungry.
Hardy is not hungry.
Isaiah is consistent.
Isaiah is not hard-working.Shawn being consistent and Shawn being not hard-working imply that Stanley is not obedient.
Stanley is consistent if and only if Isaiah is not hard-working.
Someone is consistent if and only if he is reliable.
Shawn is not reliable if and only if Stanley is not hard-working and Shawn is not typical.
If there is someone who is both not reliable and not typical, then Hardy is not hungry.
Someone is consistent if and only if he is not obedient.
Hardy being reliable is equivalent to Isaiah being hungry.
Someone who is not obedient is always both not typical and not consistent.
Hardy being hungry and Gideon being not reliable imply that Isaiah is not consistent.
Gideon being obedient and Goddard being typical imply that Shawn is not consistent and Stanley is reliable.
If there is someone who is both not hungry and not typical, then Shawn is obedient.
Tobias being typical and Shawn being not consistent imply that Shawn is reliable. | Gideon is reliable. | neutral |
Hardy is typical.
Hardy is not reliable.
Stanley is hard-working.
Hardy is not obedient.
Shawn is hard-working.
Stanley is not hungry.
Goddard is obedient.
Gideon is not consistent.
Tobias is not hungry.
Hardy is not hungry.
Isaiah is consistent.
Isaiah is not hard-working.Shawn being consistent and Shawn being not hard-working imply that Stanley is not obedient.
Stanley is consistent if and only if Isaiah is not hard-working.
Someone is consistent if and only if he is reliable.
Shawn is not reliable if and only if Stanley is not hard-working and Shawn is not typical.
If there is someone who is both not reliable and not typical, then Hardy is not hungry.
Someone is consistent if and only if he is not obedient.
Hardy being reliable is equivalent to Isaiah being hungry.
Someone who is not obedient is always both not typical and not consistent.
Hardy being hungry and Gideon being not reliable imply that Isaiah is not consistent.
Gideon being obedient and Goddard being typical imply that Shawn is not consistent and Stanley is reliable.
If there is someone who is both not hungry and not typical, then Shawn is obedient.
Tobias being typical and Shawn being not consistent imply that Shawn is reliable. | Gideon is not consistent. | entailment |
Hardy is typical.
Hardy is not reliable.
Stanley is hard-working.
Hardy is not obedient.
Shawn is hard-working.
Stanley is not hungry.
Goddard is obedient.
Gideon is not consistent.
Tobias is not hungry.
Hardy is not hungry.
Isaiah is consistent.
Isaiah is not hard-working.Shawn being consistent and Shawn being not hard-working imply that Stanley is not obedient.
Stanley is consistent if and only if Isaiah is not hard-working.
Someone is consistent if and only if he is reliable.
Shawn is not reliable if and only if Stanley is not hard-working and Shawn is not typical.
If there is someone who is both not reliable and not typical, then Hardy is not hungry.
Someone is consistent if and only if he is not obedient.
Hardy being reliable is equivalent to Isaiah being hungry.
Someone who is not obedient is always both not typical and not consistent.
Hardy being hungry and Gideon being not reliable imply that Isaiah is not consistent.
Gideon being obedient and Goddard being typical imply that Shawn is not consistent and Stanley is reliable.
If there is someone who is both not hungry and not typical, then Shawn is obedient.
Tobias being typical and Shawn being not consistent imply that Shawn is reliable. | Isaiah is reliable. | entailment |
Hardy is typical.
Hardy is not reliable.
Stanley is hard-working.
Hardy is not obedient.
Shawn is hard-working.
Stanley is not hungry.
Goddard is obedient.
Gideon is not consistent.
Tobias is not hungry.
Hardy is not hungry.
Isaiah is consistent.
Isaiah is not hard-working.Shawn being consistent and Shawn being not hard-working imply that Stanley is not obedient.
Stanley is consistent if and only if Isaiah is not hard-working.
Someone is consistent if and only if he is reliable.
Shawn is not reliable if and only if Stanley is not hard-working and Shawn is not typical.
If there is someone who is both not reliable and not typical, then Hardy is not hungry.
Someone is consistent if and only if he is not obedient.
Hardy being reliable is equivalent to Isaiah being hungry.
Someone who is not obedient is always both not typical and not consistent.
Hardy being hungry and Gideon being not reliable imply that Isaiah is not consistent.
Gideon being obedient and Goddard being typical imply that Shawn is not consistent and Stanley is reliable.
If there is someone who is both not hungry and not typical, then Shawn is obedient.
Tobias being typical and Shawn being not consistent imply that Shawn is reliable. | Goddard is not obedient. | contradiction |
Hardy is typical.
Hardy is not reliable.
Stanley is hard-working.
Hardy is not obedient.
Shawn is hard-working.
Stanley is not hungry.
Goddard is obedient.
Gideon is not consistent.
Tobias is not hungry.
Hardy is not hungry.
Isaiah is consistent.
Isaiah is not hard-working.Shawn being consistent and Shawn being not hard-working imply that Stanley is not obedient.
Stanley is consistent if and only if Isaiah is not hard-working.
Someone is consistent if and only if he is reliable.
Shawn is not reliable if and only if Stanley is not hard-working and Shawn is not typical.
If there is someone who is both not reliable and not typical, then Hardy is not hungry.
Someone is consistent if and only if he is not obedient.
Hardy being reliable is equivalent to Isaiah being hungry.
Someone who is not obedient is always both not typical and not consistent.
Hardy being hungry and Gideon being not reliable imply that Isaiah is not consistent.
Gideon being obedient and Goddard being typical imply that Shawn is not consistent and Stanley is reliable.
If there is someone who is both not hungry and not typical, then Shawn is obedient.
Tobias being typical and Shawn being not consistent imply that Shawn is reliable. | Tobias is not hard-working. | neutral |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.