premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Chatwin is optimistic.
Amery is environmental.
Kathie is fine.
Kathie is not environmental.
Kathie is not useful.
Chatwin is environmental.
Amery is not healthy.
Harley is useful.
Harley is optimistic.
Amery is not fine.
Pierce is not healthy.
Morton is useful.If someone is both useful and not environmental, then he is not jealous.
If someone is environmental, then he is both not healthy and useful.
Chatwin is useful if and only if Chatwin is not fine and Harley is not jealous.
If there is someone who is environmental, then Kathie is not jealous.
If someone is optimistic or he is environmental, then he is not fine.
It can be concluded that Morton is not useful and Harley is not environmental once knowing that Olin is not fine.
If there is at least one people who is both not healthy and not useful, then Pierce is not fine.
Someone is environmental and not jealous if and only if he is healthy.
Someone being not healthy is equivalent to being not jealous.
Someone who is eithor environmental or not healthy is always not useful.
It can be concluded that Pierce is not jealous once knowing that Olin is healthy.
Morton being fine and Amery being jealous imply that Kathie is healthy. | Pierce is not optimistic. | neutral |
Chatwin is optimistic.
Amery is environmental.
Kathie is fine.
Kathie is not environmental.
Kathie is not useful.
Chatwin is environmental.
Amery is not healthy.
Harley is useful.
Harley is optimistic.
Amery is not fine.
Pierce is not healthy.
Morton is useful.If someone is both useful and not environmental, then he is not jealous.
If someone is environmental, then he is both not healthy and useful.
Chatwin is useful if and only if Chatwin is not fine and Harley is not jealous.
If there is someone who is environmental, then Kathie is not jealous.
If someone is optimistic or he is environmental, then he is not fine.
It can be concluded that Morton is not useful and Harley is not environmental once knowing that Olin is not fine.
If there is at least one people who is both not healthy and not useful, then Pierce is not fine.
Someone is environmental and not jealous if and only if he is healthy.
Someone being not healthy is equivalent to being not jealous.
Someone who is eithor environmental or not healthy is always not useful.
It can be concluded that Pierce is not jealous once knowing that Olin is healthy.
Morton being fine and Amery being jealous imply that Kathie is healthy. | Amery is environmental. | entailment |
Chatwin is optimistic.
Amery is environmental.
Kathie is fine.
Kathie is not environmental.
Kathie is not useful.
Chatwin is environmental.
Amery is not healthy.
Harley is useful.
Harley is optimistic.
Amery is not fine.
Pierce is not healthy.
Morton is useful.If someone is both useful and not environmental, then he is not jealous.
If someone is environmental, then he is both not healthy and useful.
Chatwin is useful if and only if Chatwin is not fine and Harley is not jealous.
If there is someone who is environmental, then Kathie is not jealous.
If someone is optimistic or he is environmental, then he is not fine.
It can be concluded that Morton is not useful and Harley is not environmental once knowing that Olin is not fine.
If there is at least one people who is both not healthy and not useful, then Pierce is not fine.
Someone is environmental and not jealous if and only if he is healthy.
Someone being not healthy is equivalent to being not jealous.
Someone who is eithor environmental or not healthy is always not useful.
It can be concluded that Pierce is not jealous once knowing that Olin is healthy.
Morton being fine and Amery being jealous imply that Kathie is healthy. | Amery is not useful. | self_contradiction |
Chatwin is optimistic.
Amery is environmental.
Kathie is fine.
Kathie is not environmental.
Kathie is not useful.
Chatwin is environmental.
Amery is not healthy.
Harley is useful.
Harley is optimistic.
Amery is not fine.
Pierce is not healthy.
Morton is useful.If someone is both useful and not environmental, then he is not jealous.
If someone is environmental, then he is both not healthy and useful.
Chatwin is useful if and only if Chatwin is not fine and Harley is not jealous.
If there is someone who is environmental, then Kathie is not jealous.
If someone is optimistic or he is environmental, then he is not fine.
It can be concluded that Morton is not useful and Harley is not environmental once knowing that Olin is not fine.
If there is at least one people who is both not healthy and not useful, then Pierce is not fine.
Someone is environmental and not jealous if and only if he is healthy.
Someone being not healthy is equivalent to being not jealous.
Someone who is eithor environmental or not healthy is always not useful.
It can be concluded that Pierce is not jealous once knowing that Olin is healthy.
Morton being fine and Amery being jealous imply that Kathie is healthy. | Pierce is jealous. | contradiction |
Chatwin is optimistic.
Amery is environmental.
Kathie is fine.
Kathie is not environmental.
Kathie is not useful.
Chatwin is environmental.
Amery is not healthy.
Harley is useful.
Harley is optimistic.
Amery is not fine.
Pierce is not healthy.
Morton is useful.If someone is both useful and not environmental, then he is not jealous.
If someone is environmental, then he is both not healthy and useful.
Chatwin is useful if and only if Chatwin is not fine and Harley is not jealous.
If there is someone who is environmental, then Kathie is not jealous.
If someone is optimistic or he is environmental, then he is not fine.
It can be concluded that Morton is not useful and Harley is not environmental once knowing that Olin is not fine.
If there is at least one people who is both not healthy and not useful, then Pierce is not fine.
Someone is environmental and not jealous if and only if he is healthy.
Someone being not healthy is equivalent to being not jealous.
Someone who is eithor environmental or not healthy is always not useful.
It can be concluded that Pierce is not jealous once knowing that Olin is healthy.
Morton being fine and Amery being jealous imply that Kathie is healthy. | Morton is not optimistic. | neutral |
Chatwin is optimistic.
Amery is environmental.
Kathie is fine.
Kathie is not environmental.
Kathie is not useful.
Chatwin is environmental.
Amery is not healthy.
Harley is useful.
Harley is optimistic.
Amery is not fine.
Pierce is not healthy.
Morton is useful.If someone is both useful and not environmental, then he is not jealous.
If someone is environmental, then he is both not healthy and useful.
Chatwin is useful if and only if Chatwin is not fine and Harley is not jealous.
If there is someone who is environmental, then Kathie is not jealous.
If someone is optimistic or he is environmental, then he is not fine.
It can be concluded that Morton is not useful and Harley is not environmental once knowing that Olin is not fine.
If there is at least one people who is both not healthy and not useful, then Pierce is not fine.
Someone is environmental and not jealous if and only if he is healthy.
Someone being not healthy is equivalent to being not jealous.
Someone who is eithor environmental or not healthy is always not useful.
It can be concluded that Pierce is not jealous once knowing that Olin is healthy.
Morton being fine and Amery being jealous imply that Kathie is healthy. | Amery is healthy. | self_contradiction |
Chatwin is optimistic.
Amery is environmental.
Kathie is fine.
Kathie is not environmental.
Kathie is not useful.
Chatwin is environmental.
Amery is not healthy.
Harley is useful.
Harley is optimistic.
Amery is not fine.
Pierce is not healthy.
Morton is useful.If someone is both useful and not environmental, then he is not jealous.
If someone is environmental, then he is both not healthy and useful.
Chatwin is useful if and only if Chatwin is not fine and Harley is not jealous.
If there is someone who is environmental, then Kathie is not jealous.
If someone is optimistic or he is environmental, then he is not fine.
It can be concluded that Morton is not useful and Harley is not environmental once knowing that Olin is not fine.
If there is at least one people who is both not healthy and not useful, then Pierce is not fine.
Someone is environmental and not jealous if and only if he is healthy.
Someone being not healthy is equivalent to being not jealous.
Someone who is eithor environmental or not healthy is always not useful.
It can be concluded that Pierce is not jealous once knowing that Olin is healthy.
Morton being fine and Amery being jealous imply that Kathie is healthy. | Pierce is not useful. | entailment |
Chatwin is optimistic.
Amery is environmental.
Kathie is fine.
Kathie is not environmental.
Kathie is not useful.
Chatwin is environmental.
Amery is not healthy.
Harley is useful.
Harley is optimistic.
Amery is not fine.
Pierce is not healthy.
Morton is useful.If someone is both useful and not environmental, then he is not jealous.
If someone is environmental, then he is both not healthy and useful.
Chatwin is useful if and only if Chatwin is not fine and Harley is not jealous.
If there is someone who is environmental, then Kathie is not jealous.
If someone is optimistic or he is environmental, then he is not fine.
It can be concluded that Morton is not useful and Harley is not environmental once knowing that Olin is not fine.
If there is at least one people who is both not healthy and not useful, then Pierce is not fine.
Someone is environmental and not jealous if and only if he is healthy.
Someone being not healthy is equivalent to being not jealous.
Someone who is eithor environmental or not healthy is always not useful.
It can be concluded that Pierce is not jealous once knowing that Olin is healthy.
Morton being fine and Amery being jealous imply that Kathie is healthy. | Olin is useful. | neutral |
Chatwin is optimistic.
Amery is environmental.
Kathie is fine.
Kathie is not environmental.
Kathie is not useful.
Chatwin is environmental.
Amery is not healthy.
Harley is useful.
Harley is optimistic.
Amery is not fine.
Pierce is not healthy.
Morton is useful.If someone is both useful and not environmental, then he is not jealous.
If someone is environmental, then he is both not healthy and useful.
Chatwin is useful if and only if Chatwin is not fine and Harley is not jealous.
If there is someone who is environmental, then Kathie is not jealous.
If someone is optimistic or he is environmental, then he is not fine.
It can be concluded that Morton is not useful and Harley is not environmental once knowing that Olin is not fine.
If there is at least one people who is both not healthy and not useful, then Pierce is not fine.
Someone is environmental and not jealous if and only if he is healthy.
Someone being not healthy is equivalent to being not jealous.
Someone who is eithor environmental or not healthy is always not useful.
It can be concluded that Pierce is not jealous once knowing that Olin is healthy.
Morton being fine and Amery being jealous imply that Kathie is healthy. | Chatwin is environmental. | entailment |
Chatwin is optimistic.
Amery is environmental.
Kathie is fine.
Kathie is not environmental.
Kathie is not useful.
Chatwin is environmental.
Amery is not healthy.
Harley is useful.
Harley is optimistic.
Amery is not fine.
Pierce is not healthy.
Morton is useful.If someone is both useful and not environmental, then he is not jealous.
If someone is environmental, then he is both not healthy and useful.
Chatwin is useful if and only if Chatwin is not fine and Harley is not jealous.
If there is someone who is environmental, then Kathie is not jealous.
If someone is optimistic or he is environmental, then he is not fine.
It can be concluded that Morton is not useful and Harley is not environmental once knowing that Olin is not fine.
If there is at least one people who is both not healthy and not useful, then Pierce is not fine.
Someone is environmental and not jealous if and only if he is healthy.
Someone being not healthy is equivalent to being not jealous.
Someone who is eithor environmental or not healthy is always not useful.
It can be concluded that Pierce is not jealous once knowing that Olin is healthy.
Morton being fine and Amery being jealous imply that Kathie is healthy. | Chatwin is not healthy. | self_contradiction |
Chatwin is optimistic.
Amery is environmental.
Kathie is fine.
Kathie is not environmental.
Kathie is not useful.
Chatwin is environmental.
Amery is not healthy.
Harley is useful.
Harley is optimistic.
Amery is not fine.
Pierce is not healthy.
Morton is useful.If someone is both useful and not environmental, then he is not jealous.
If someone is environmental, then he is both not healthy and useful.
Chatwin is useful if and only if Chatwin is not fine and Harley is not jealous.
If there is someone who is environmental, then Kathie is not jealous.
If someone is optimistic or he is environmental, then he is not fine.
It can be concluded that Morton is not useful and Harley is not environmental once knowing that Olin is not fine.
If there is at least one people who is both not healthy and not useful, then Pierce is not fine.
Someone is environmental and not jealous if and only if he is healthy.
Someone being not healthy is equivalent to being not jealous.
Someone who is eithor environmental or not healthy is always not useful.
It can be concluded that Pierce is not jealous once knowing that Olin is healthy.
Morton being fine and Amery being jealous imply that Kathie is healthy. | Olin is not jealous. | neutral |
Chatwin is optimistic.
Amery is environmental.
Kathie is fine.
Kathie is not environmental.
Kathie is not useful.
Chatwin is environmental.
Amery is not healthy.
Harley is useful.
Harley is optimistic.
Amery is not fine.
Pierce is not healthy.
Morton is useful.If someone is both useful and not environmental, then he is not jealous.
If someone is environmental, then he is both not healthy and useful.
Chatwin is useful if and only if Chatwin is not fine and Harley is not jealous.
If there is someone who is environmental, then Kathie is not jealous.
If someone is optimistic or he is environmental, then he is not fine.
It can be concluded that Morton is not useful and Harley is not environmental once knowing that Olin is not fine.
If there is at least one people who is both not healthy and not useful, then Pierce is not fine.
Someone is environmental and not jealous if and only if he is healthy.
Someone being not healthy is equivalent to being not jealous.
Someone who is eithor environmental or not healthy is always not useful.
It can be concluded that Pierce is not jealous once knowing that Olin is healthy.
Morton being fine and Amery being jealous imply that Kathie is healthy. | Kathie is useful. | contradiction |
Chatwin is optimistic.
Amery is environmental.
Kathie is fine.
Kathie is not environmental.
Kathie is not useful.
Chatwin is environmental.
Amery is not healthy.
Harley is useful.
Harley is optimistic.
Amery is not fine.
Pierce is not healthy.
Morton is useful.If someone is both useful and not environmental, then he is not jealous.
If someone is environmental, then he is both not healthy and useful.
Chatwin is useful if and only if Chatwin is not fine and Harley is not jealous.
If there is someone who is environmental, then Kathie is not jealous.
If someone is optimistic or he is environmental, then he is not fine.
It can be concluded that Morton is not useful and Harley is not environmental once knowing that Olin is not fine.
If there is at least one people who is both not healthy and not useful, then Pierce is not fine.
Someone is environmental and not jealous if and only if he is healthy.
Someone being not healthy is equivalent to being not jealous.
Someone who is eithor environmental or not healthy is always not useful.
It can be concluded that Pierce is not jealous once knowing that Olin is healthy.
Morton being fine and Amery being jealous imply that Kathie is healthy. | Chatwin is not useful. | self_contradiction |
Chatwin is optimistic.
Amery is environmental.
Kathie is fine.
Kathie is not environmental.
Kathie is not useful.
Chatwin is environmental.
Amery is not healthy.
Harley is useful.
Harley is optimistic.
Amery is not fine.
Pierce is not healthy.
Morton is useful.If someone is both useful and not environmental, then he is not jealous.
If someone is environmental, then he is both not healthy and useful.
Chatwin is useful if and only if Chatwin is not fine and Harley is not jealous.
If there is someone who is environmental, then Kathie is not jealous.
If someone is optimistic or he is environmental, then he is not fine.
It can be concluded that Morton is not useful and Harley is not environmental once knowing that Olin is not fine.
If there is at least one people who is both not healthy and not useful, then Pierce is not fine.
Someone is environmental and not jealous if and only if he is healthy.
Someone being not healthy is equivalent to being not jealous.
Someone who is eithor environmental or not healthy is always not useful.
It can be concluded that Pierce is not jealous once knowing that Olin is healthy.
Morton being fine and Amery being jealous imply that Kathie is healthy. | Pierce is useful. | contradiction |
Chatwin is optimistic.
Amery is environmental.
Kathie is fine.
Kathie is not environmental.
Kathie is not useful.
Chatwin is environmental.
Amery is not healthy.
Harley is useful.
Harley is optimistic.
Amery is not fine.
Pierce is not healthy.
Morton is useful.If someone is both useful and not environmental, then he is not jealous.
If someone is environmental, then he is both not healthy and useful.
Chatwin is useful if and only if Chatwin is not fine and Harley is not jealous.
If there is someone who is environmental, then Kathie is not jealous.
If someone is optimistic or he is environmental, then he is not fine.
It can be concluded that Morton is not useful and Harley is not environmental once knowing that Olin is not fine.
If there is at least one people who is both not healthy and not useful, then Pierce is not fine.
Someone is environmental and not jealous if and only if he is healthy.
Someone being not healthy is equivalent to being not jealous.
Someone who is eithor environmental or not healthy is always not useful.
It can be concluded that Pierce is not jealous once knowing that Olin is healthy.
Morton being fine and Amery being jealous imply that Kathie is healthy. | Olin is environmental. | neutral |
Chatwin is optimistic.
Amery is environmental.
Kathie is fine.
Kathie is not environmental.
Kathie is not useful.
Chatwin is environmental.
Amery is not healthy.
Harley is useful.
Harley is optimistic.
Amery is not fine.
Pierce is not healthy.
Morton is useful.If someone is both useful and not environmental, then he is not jealous.
If someone is environmental, then he is both not healthy and useful.
Chatwin is useful if and only if Chatwin is not fine and Harley is not jealous.
If there is someone who is environmental, then Kathie is not jealous.
If someone is optimistic or he is environmental, then he is not fine.
It can be concluded that Morton is not useful and Harley is not environmental once knowing that Olin is not fine.
If there is at least one people who is both not healthy and not useful, then Pierce is not fine.
Someone is environmental and not jealous if and only if he is healthy.
Someone being not healthy is equivalent to being not jealous.
Someone who is eithor environmental or not healthy is always not useful.
It can be concluded that Pierce is not jealous once knowing that Olin is healthy.
Morton being fine and Amery being jealous imply that Kathie is healthy. | Pierce is not healthy. | entailment |
Chatwin is optimistic.
Amery is environmental.
Kathie is fine.
Kathie is not environmental.
Kathie is not useful.
Chatwin is environmental.
Amery is not healthy.
Harley is useful.
Harley is optimistic.
Amery is not fine.
Pierce is not healthy.
Morton is useful.If someone is both useful and not environmental, then he is not jealous.
If someone is environmental, then he is both not healthy and useful.
Chatwin is useful if and only if Chatwin is not fine and Harley is not jealous.
If there is someone who is environmental, then Kathie is not jealous.
If someone is optimistic or he is environmental, then he is not fine.
It can be concluded that Morton is not useful and Harley is not environmental once knowing that Olin is not fine.
If there is at least one people who is both not healthy and not useful, then Pierce is not fine.
Someone is environmental and not jealous if and only if he is healthy.
Someone being not healthy is equivalent to being not jealous.
Someone who is eithor environmental or not healthy is always not useful.
It can be concluded that Pierce is not jealous once knowing that Olin is healthy.
Morton being fine and Amery being jealous imply that Kathie is healthy. | Harley is not jealous. | entailment |
Chatwin is optimistic.
Amery is environmental.
Kathie is fine.
Kathie is not environmental.
Kathie is not useful.
Chatwin is environmental.
Amery is not healthy.
Harley is useful.
Harley is optimistic.
Amery is not fine.
Pierce is not healthy.
Morton is useful.If someone is both useful and not environmental, then he is not jealous.
If someone is environmental, then he is both not healthy and useful.
Chatwin is useful if and only if Chatwin is not fine and Harley is not jealous.
If there is someone who is environmental, then Kathie is not jealous.
If someone is optimistic or he is environmental, then he is not fine.
It can be concluded that Morton is not useful and Harley is not environmental once knowing that Olin is not fine.
If there is at least one people who is both not healthy and not useful, then Pierce is not fine.
Someone is environmental and not jealous if and only if he is healthy.
Someone being not healthy is equivalent to being not jealous.
Someone who is eithor environmental or not healthy is always not useful.
It can be concluded that Pierce is not jealous once knowing that Olin is healthy.
Morton being fine and Amery being jealous imply that Kathie is healthy. | Amery is useful. | self_contradiction |
Chatwin is optimistic.
Amery is environmental.
Kathie is fine.
Kathie is not environmental.
Kathie is not useful.
Chatwin is environmental.
Amery is not healthy.
Harley is useful.
Harley is optimistic.
Amery is not fine.
Pierce is not healthy.
Morton is useful.If someone is both useful and not environmental, then he is not jealous.
If someone is environmental, then he is both not healthy and useful.
Chatwin is useful if and only if Chatwin is not fine and Harley is not jealous.
If there is someone who is environmental, then Kathie is not jealous.
If someone is optimistic or he is environmental, then he is not fine.
It can be concluded that Morton is not useful and Harley is not environmental once knowing that Olin is not fine.
If there is at least one people who is both not healthy and not useful, then Pierce is not fine.
Someone is environmental and not jealous if and only if he is healthy.
Someone being not healthy is equivalent to being not jealous.
Someone who is eithor environmental or not healthy is always not useful.
It can be concluded that Pierce is not jealous once knowing that Olin is healthy.
Morton being fine and Amery being jealous imply that Kathie is healthy. | Amery is jealous. | contradiction |
Chatwin is optimistic.
Amery is environmental.
Kathie is fine.
Kathie is not environmental.
Kathie is not useful.
Chatwin is environmental.
Amery is not healthy.
Harley is useful.
Harley is optimistic.
Amery is not fine.
Pierce is not healthy.
Morton is useful.If someone is both useful and not environmental, then he is not jealous.
If someone is environmental, then he is both not healthy and useful.
Chatwin is useful if and only if Chatwin is not fine and Harley is not jealous.
If there is someone who is environmental, then Kathie is not jealous.
If someone is optimistic or he is environmental, then he is not fine.
It can be concluded that Morton is not useful and Harley is not environmental once knowing that Olin is not fine.
If there is at least one people who is both not healthy and not useful, then Pierce is not fine.
Someone is environmental and not jealous if and only if he is healthy.
Someone being not healthy is equivalent to being not jealous.
Someone who is eithor environmental or not healthy is always not useful.
It can be concluded that Pierce is not jealous once knowing that Olin is healthy.
Morton being fine and Amery being jealous imply that Kathie is healthy. | Chatwin is not environmental. | contradiction |
Valentina is aggressive.
Clive is every.
Clive is not unsightly.
Chapman is sticky.
Gresham is sticky.
Gresham is every.
Chapman is not fair-minded.
Brian is not sticky.
Gresham is not fair-minded.
Harmony is not unsightly.
Addison is not aggressive.
Valentina is not unsightly.If there is at least one people who is every or not aggressive, then Valentina is not unsightly.
Brian is not beautiful if and only if Clive is not fair-minded.
If there is at least one people who is unsightly, then Clive is not sticky and Chapman is every.
Someone being both fair-minded and sticky is equivalent to being not aggressive and beautiful.
If there is someone who is either unsightly or not beautiful, then Addison is not fair-minded.
If there is someone who is both unsightly and not fair-minded, then Valentina is every.
Someone is not sticky if and only if he is not fair-minded.
If there is someone who is not sticky, then Gresham is not every.
If Addison is not sticky or Gresham is unsightly, then Chapman is aggressive.
Gresham being sticky and Gresham being not fair-minded imply that Addison is not aggressive.
If there is someone who is either beautiful or sticky, then Chapman is not every.
If there is at least one people who is not unsightly or beautiful, then Gresham is not sticky. | Clive is not every. | contradiction |
Valentina is aggressive.
Clive is every.
Clive is not unsightly.
Chapman is sticky.
Gresham is sticky.
Gresham is every.
Chapman is not fair-minded.
Brian is not sticky.
Gresham is not fair-minded.
Harmony is not unsightly.
Addison is not aggressive.
Valentina is not unsightly.If there is at least one people who is every or not aggressive, then Valentina is not unsightly.
Brian is not beautiful if and only if Clive is not fair-minded.
If there is at least one people who is unsightly, then Clive is not sticky and Chapman is every.
Someone being both fair-minded and sticky is equivalent to being not aggressive and beautiful.
If there is someone who is either unsightly or not beautiful, then Addison is not fair-minded.
If there is someone who is both unsightly and not fair-minded, then Valentina is every.
Someone is not sticky if and only if he is not fair-minded.
If there is someone who is not sticky, then Gresham is not every.
If Addison is not sticky or Gresham is unsightly, then Chapman is aggressive.
Gresham being sticky and Gresham being not fair-minded imply that Addison is not aggressive.
If there is someone who is either beautiful or sticky, then Chapman is not every.
If there is at least one people who is not unsightly or beautiful, then Gresham is not sticky. | Chapman is not sticky. | self_contradiction |
Valentina is aggressive.
Clive is every.
Clive is not unsightly.
Chapman is sticky.
Gresham is sticky.
Gresham is every.
Chapman is not fair-minded.
Brian is not sticky.
Gresham is not fair-minded.
Harmony is not unsightly.
Addison is not aggressive.
Valentina is not unsightly.If there is at least one people who is every or not aggressive, then Valentina is not unsightly.
Brian is not beautiful if and only if Clive is not fair-minded.
If there is at least one people who is unsightly, then Clive is not sticky and Chapman is every.
Someone being both fair-minded and sticky is equivalent to being not aggressive and beautiful.
If there is someone who is either unsightly or not beautiful, then Addison is not fair-minded.
If there is someone who is both unsightly and not fair-minded, then Valentina is every.
Someone is not sticky if and only if he is not fair-minded.
If there is someone who is not sticky, then Gresham is not every.
If Addison is not sticky or Gresham is unsightly, then Chapman is aggressive.
Gresham being sticky and Gresham being not fair-minded imply that Addison is not aggressive.
If there is someone who is either beautiful or sticky, then Chapman is not every.
If there is at least one people who is not unsightly or beautiful, then Gresham is not sticky. | Brian is not sticky. | entailment |
Valentina is aggressive.
Clive is every.
Clive is not unsightly.
Chapman is sticky.
Gresham is sticky.
Gresham is every.
Chapman is not fair-minded.
Brian is not sticky.
Gresham is not fair-minded.
Harmony is not unsightly.
Addison is not aggressive.
Valentina is not unsightly.If there is at least one people who is every or not aggressive, then Valentina is not unsightly.
Brian is not beautiful if and only if Clive is not fair-minded.
If there is at least one people who is unsightly, then Clive is not sticky and Chapman is every.
Someone being both fair-minded and sticky is equivalent to being not aggressive and beautiful.
If there is someone who is either unsightly or not beautiful, then Addison is not fair-minded.
If there is someone who is both unsightly and not fair-minded, then Valentina is every.
Someone is not sticky if and only if he is not fair-minded.
If there is someone who is not sticky, then Gresham is not every.
If Addison is not sticky or Gresham is unsightly, then Chapman is aggressive.
Gresham being sticky and Gresham being not fair-minded imply that Addison is not aggressive.
If there is someone who is either beautiful or sticky, then Chapman is not every.
If there is at least one people who is not unsightly or beautiful, then Gresham is not sticky. | Clive is unsightly. | contradiction |
Valentina is aggressive.
Clive is every.
Clive is not unsightly.
Chapman is sticky.
Gresham is sticky.
Gresham is every.
Chapman is not fair-minded.
Brian is not sticky.
Gresham is not fair-minded.
Harmony is not unsightly.
Addison is not aggressive.
Valentina is not unsightly.If there is at least one people who is every or not aggressive, then Valentina is not unsightly.
Brian is not beautiful if and only if Clive is not fair-minded.
If there is at least one people who is unsightly, then Clive is not sticky and Chapman is every.
Someone being both fair-minded and sticky is equivalent to being not aggressive and beautiful.
If there is someone who is either unsightly or not beautiful, then Addison is not fair-minded.
If there is someone who is both unsightly and not fair-minded, then Valentina is every.
Someone is not sticky if and only if he is not fair-minded.
If there is someone who is not sticky, then Gresham is not every.
If Addison is not sticky or Gresham is unsightly, then Chapman is aggressive.
Gresham being sticky and Gresham being not fair-minded imply that Addison is not aggressive.
If there is someone who is either beautiful or sticky, then Chapman is not every.
If there is at least one people who is not unsightly or beautiful, then Gresham is not sticky. | Gresham is not fair-minded. | entailment |
Valentina is aggressive.
Clive is every.
Clive is not unsightly.
Chapman is sticky.
Gresham is sticky.
Gresham is every.
Chapman is not fair-minded.
Brian is not sticky.
Gresham is not fair-minded.
Harmony is not unsightly.
Addison is not aggressive.
Valentina is not unsightly.If there is at least one people who is every or not aggressive, then Valentina is not unsightly.
Brian is not beautiful if and only if Clive is not fair-minded.
If there is at least one people who is unsightly, then Clive is not sticky and Chapman is every.
Someone being both fair-minded and sticky is equivalent to being not aggressive and beautiful.
If there is someone who is either unsightly or not beautiful, then Addison is not fair-minded.
If there is someone who is both unsightly and not fair-minded, then Valentina is every.
Someone is not sticky if and only if he is not fair-minded.
If there is someone who is not sticky, then Gresham is not every.
If Addison is not sticky or Gresham is unsightly, then Chapman is aggressive.
Gresham being sticky and Gresham being not fair-minded imply that Addison is not aggressive.
If there is someone who is either beautiful or sticky, then Chapman is not every.
If there is at least one people who is not unsightly or beautiful, then Gresham is not sticky. | Chapman is fair-minded. | contradiction |
Valentina is aggressive.
Clive is every.
Clive is not unsightly.
Chapman is sticky.
Gresham is sticky.
Gresham is every.
Chapman is not fair-minded.
Brian is not sticky.
Gresham is not fair-minded.
Harmony is not unsightly.
Addison is not aggressive.
Valentina is not unsightly.If there is at least one people who is every or not aggressive, then Valentina is not unsightly.
Brian is not beautiful if and only if Clive is not fair-minded.
If there is at least one people who is unsightly, then Clive is not sticky and Chapman is every.
Someone being both fair-minded and sticky is equivalent to being not aggressive and beautiful.
If there is someone who is either unsightly or not beautiful, then Addison is not fair-minded.
If there is someone who is both unsightly and not fair-minded, then Valentina is every.
Someone is not sticky if and only if he is not fair-minded.
If there is someone who is not sticky, then Gresham is not every.
If Addison is not sticky or Gresham is unsightly, then Chapman is aggressive.
Gresham being sticky and Gresham being not fair-minded imply that Addison is not aggressive.
If there is someone who is either beautiful or sticky, then Chapman is not every.
If there is at least one people who is not unsightly or beautiful, then Gresham is not sticky. | Harmony is not aggressive. | neutral |
Valentina is aggressive.
Clive is every.
Clive is not unsightly.
Chapman is sticky.
Gresham is sticky.
Gresham is every.
Chapman is not fair-minded.
Brian is not sticky.
Gresham is not fair-minded.
Harmony is not unsightly.
Addison is not aggressive.
Valentina is not unsightly.If there is at least one people who is every or not aggressive, then Valentina is not unsightly.
Brian is not beautiful if and only if Clive is not fair-minded.
If there is at least one people who is unsightly, then Clive is not sticky and Chapman is every.
Someone being both fair-minded and sticky is equivalent to being not aggressive and beautiful.
If there is someone who is either unsightly or not beautiful, then Addison is not fair-minded.
If there is someone who is both unsightly and not fair-minded, then Valentina is every.
Someone is not sticky if and only if he is not fair-minded.
If there is someone who is not sticky, then Gresham is not every.
If Addison is not sticky or Gresham is unsightly, then Chapman is aggressive.
Gresham being sticky and Gresham being not fair-minded imply that Addison is not aggressive.
If there is someone who is either beautiful or sticky, then Chapman is not every.
If there is at least one people who is not unsightly or beautiful, then Gresham is not sticky. | Gresham is every. | self_contradiction |
Valentina is aggressive.
Clive is every.
Clive is not unsightly.
Chapman is sticky.
Gresham is sticky.
Gresham is every.
Chapman is not fair-minded.
Brian is not sticky.
Gresham is not fair-minded.
Harmony is not unsightly.
Addison is not aggressive.
Valentina is not unsightly.If there is at least one people who is every or not aggressive, then Valentina is not unsightly.
Brian is not beautiful if and only if Clive is not fair-minded.
If there is at least one people who is unsightly, then Clive is not sticky and Chapman is every.
Someone being both fair-minded and sticky is equivalent to being not aggressive and beautiful.
If there is someone who is either unsightly or not beautiful, then Addison is not fair-minded.
If there is someone who is both unsightly and not fair-minded, then Valentina is every.
Someone is not sticky if and only if he is not fair-minded.
If there is someone who is not sticky, then Gresham is not every.
If Addison is not sticky or Gresham is unsightly, then Chapman is aggressive.
Gresham being sticky and Gresham being not fair-minded imply that Addison is not aggressive.
If there is someone who is either beautiful or sticky, then Chapman is not every.
If there is at least one people who is not unsightly or beautiful, then Gresham is not sticky. | Harmony is unsightly. | contradiction |
Valentina is aggressive.
Clive is every.
Clive is not unsightly.
Chapman is sticky.
Gresham is sticky.
Gresham is every.
Chapman is not fair-minded.
Brian is not sticky.
Gresham is not fair-minded.
Harmony is not unsightly.
Addison is not aggressive.
Valentina is not unsightly.If there is at least one people who is every or not aggressive, then Valentina is not unsightly.
Brian is not beautiful if and only if Clive is not fair-minded.
If there is at least one people who is unsightly, then Clive is not sticky and Chapman is every.
Someone being both fair-minded and sticky is equivalent to being not aggressive and beautiful.
If there is someone who is either unsightly or not beautiful, then Addison is not fair-minded.
If there is someone who is both unsightly and not fair-minded, then Valentina is every.
Someone is not sticky if and only if he is not fair-minded.
If there is someone who is not sticky, then Gresham is not every.
If Addison is not sticky or Gresham is unsightly, then Chapman is aggressive.
Gresham being sticky and Gresham being not fair-minded imply that Addison is not aggressive.
If there is someone who is either beautiful or sticky, then Chapman is not every.
If there is at least one people who is not unsightly or beautiful, then Gresham is not sticky. | Gresham is sticky. | self_contradiction |
Valentina is aggressive.
Clive is every.
Clive is not unsightly.
Chapman is sticky.
Gresham is sticky.
Gresham is every.
Chapman is not fair-minded.
Brian is not sticky.
Gresham is not fair-minded.
Harmony is not unsightly.
Addison is not aggressive.
Valentina is not unsightly.If there is at least one people who is every or not aggressive, then Valentina is not unsightly.
Brian is not beautiful if and only if Clive is not fair-minded.
If there is at least one people who is unsightly, then Clive is not sticky and Chapman is every.
Someone being both fair-minded and sticky is equivalent to being not aggressive and beautiful.
If there is someone who is either unsightly or not beautiful, then Addison is not fair-minded.
If there is someone who is both unsightly and not fair-minded, then Valentina is every.
Someone is not sticky if and only if he is not fair-minded.
If there is someone who is not sticky, then Gresham is not every.
If Addison is not sticky or Gresham is unsightly, then Chapman is aggressive.
Gresham being sticky and Gresham being not fair-minded imply that Addison is not aggressive.
If there is someone who is either beautiful or sticky, then Chapman is not every.
If there is at least one people who is not unsightly or beautiful, then Gresham is not sticky. | Brian is beautiful. | neutral |
Valentina is aggressive.
Clive is every.
Clive is not unsightly.
Chapman is sticky.
Gresham is sticky.
Gresham is every.
Chapman is not fair-minded.
Brian is not sticky.
Gresham is not fair-minded.
Harmony is not unsightly.
Addison is not aggressive.
Valentina is not unsightly.If there is at least one people who is every or not aggressive, then Valentina is not unsightly.
Brian is not beautiful if and only if Clive is not fair-minded.
If there is at least one people who is unsightly, then Clive is not sticky and Chapman is every.
Someone being both fair-minded and sticky is equivalent to being not aggressive and beautiful.
If there is someone who is either unsightly or not beautiful, then Addison is not fair-minded.
If there is someone who is both unsightly and not fair-minded, then Valentina is every.
Someone is not sticky if and only if he is not fair-minded.
If there is someone who is not sticky, then Gresham is not every.
If Addison is not sticky or Gresham is unsightly, then Chapman is aggressive.
Gresham being sticky and Gresham being not fair-minded imply that Addison is not aggressive.
If there is someone who is either beautiful or sticky, then Chapman is not every.
If there is at least one people who is not unsightly or beautiful, then Gresham is not sticky. | Brian is not fair-minded. | entailment |
Valentina is aggressive.
Clive is every.
Clive is not unsightly.
Chapman is sticky.
Gresham is sticky.
Gresham is every.
Chapman is not fair-minded.
Brian is not sticky.
Gresham is not fair-minded.
Harmony is not unsightly.
Addison is not aggressive.
Valentina is not unsightly.If there is at least one people who is every or not aggressive, then Valentina is not unsightly.
Brian is not beautiful if and only if Clive is not fair-minded.
If there is at least one people who is unsightly, then Clive is not sticky and Chapman is every.
Someone being both fair-minded and sticky is equivalent to being not aggressive and beautiful.
If there is someone who is either unsightly or not beautiful, then Addison is not fair-minded.
If there is someone who is both unsightly and not fair-minded, then Valentina is every.
Someone is not sticky if and only if he is not fair-minded.
If there is someone who is not sticky, then Gresham is not every.
If Addison is not sticky or Gresham is unsightly, then Chapman is aggressive.
Gresham being sticky and Gresham being not fair-minded imply that Addison is not aggressive.
If there is someone who is either beautiful or sticky, then Chapman is not every.
If there is at least one people who is not unsightly or beautiful, then Gresham is not sticky. | Addison is not aggressive. | entailment |
Valentina is aggressive.
Clive is every.
Clive is not unsightly.
Chapman is sticky.
Gresham is sticky.
Gresham is every.
Chapman is not fair-minded.
Brian is not sticky.
Gresham is not fair-minded.
Harmony is not unsightly.
Addison is not aggressive.
Valentina is not unsightly.If there is at least one people who is every or not aggressive, then Valentina is not unsightly.
Brian is not beautiful if and only if Clive is not fair-minded.
If there is at least one people who is unsightly, then Clive is not sticky and Chapman is every.
Someone being both fair-minded and sticky is equivalent to being not aggressive and beautiful.
If there is someone who is either unsightly or not beautiful, then Addison is not fair-minded.
If there is someone who is both unsightly and not fair-minded, then Valentina is every.
Someone is not sticky if and only if he is not fair-minded.
If there is someone who is not sticky, then Gresham is not every.
If Addison is not sticky or Gresham is unsightly, then Chapman is aggressive.
Gresham being sticky and Gresham being not fair-minded imply that Addison is not aggressive.
If there is someone who is either beautiful or sticky, then Chapman is not every.
If there is at least one people who is not unsightly or beautiful, then Gresham is not sticky. | Addison is sticky. | neutral |
Valentina is aggressive.
Clive is every.
Clive is not unsightly.
Chapman is sticky.
Gresham is sticky.
Gresham is every.
Chapman is not fair-minded.
Brian is not sticky.
Gresham is not fair-minded.
Harmony is not unsightly.
Addison is not aggressive.
Valentina is not unsightly.If there is at least one people who is every or not aggressive, then Valentina is not unsightly.
Brian is not beautiful if and only if Clive is not fair-minded.
If there is at least one people who is unsightly, then Clive is not sticky and Chapman is every.
Someone being both fair-minded and sticky is equivalent to being not aggressive and beautiful.
If there is someone who is either unsightly or not beautiful, then Addison is not fair-minded.
If there is someone who is both unsightly and not fair-minded, then Valentina is every.
Someone is not sticky if and only if he is not fair-minded.
If there is someone who is not sticky, then Gresham is not every.
If Addison is not sticky or Gresham is unsightly, then Chapman is aggressive.
Gresham being sticky and Gresham being not fair-minded imply that Addison is not aggressive.
If there is someone who is either beautiful or sticky, then Chapman is not every.
If there is at least one people who is not unsightly or beautiful, then Gresham is not sticky. | Gresham is not sticky. | self_contradiction |
Valentina is aggressive.
Clive is every.
Clive is not unsightly.
Chapman is sticky.
Gresham is sticky.
Gresham is every.
Chapman is not fair-minded.
Brian is not sticky.
Gresham is not fair-minded.
Harmony is not unsightly.
Addison is not aggressive.
Valentina is not unsightly.If there is at least one people who is every or not aggressive, then Valentina is not unsightly.
Brian is not beautiful if and only if Clive is not fair-minded.
If there is at least one people who is unsightly, then Clive is not sticky and Chapman is every.
Someone being both fair-minded and sticky is equivalent to being not aggressive and beautiful.
If there is someone who is either unsightly or not beautiful, then Addison is not fair-minded.
If there is someone who is both unsightly and not fair-minded, then Valentina is every.
Someone is not sticky if and only if he is not fair-minded.
If there is someone who is not sticky, then Gresham is not every.
If Addison is not sticky or Gresham is unsightly, then Chapman is aggressive.
Gresham being sticky and Gresham being not fair-minded imply that Addison is not aggressive.
If there is someone who is either beautiful or sticky, then Chapman is not every.
If there is at least one people who is not unsightly or beautiful, then Gresham is not sticky. | Addison is not sticky. | neutral |
Valentina is aggressive.
Clive is every.
Clive is not unsightly.
Chapman is sticky.
Gresham is sticky.
Gresham is every.
Chapman is not fair-minded.
Brian is not sticky.
Gresham is not fair-minded.
Harmony is not unsightly.
Addison is not aggressive.
Valentina is not unsightly.If there is at least one people who is every or not aggressive, then Valentina is not unsightly.
Brian is not beautiful if and only if Clive is not fair-minded.
If there is at least one people who is unsightly, then Clive is not sticky and Chapman is every.
Someone being both fair-minded and sticky is equivalent to being not aggressive and beautiful.
If there is someone who is either unsightly or not beautiful, then Addison is not fair-minded.
If there is someone who is both unsightly and not fair-minded, then Valentina is every.
Someone is not sticky if and only if he is not fair-minded.
If there is someone who is not sticky, then Gresham is not every.
If Addison is not sticky or Gresham is unsightly, then Chapman is aggressive.
Gresham being sticky and Gresham being not fair-minded imply that Addison is not aggressive.
If there is someone who is either beautiful or sticky, then Chapman is not every.
If there is at least one people who is not unsightly or beautiful, then Gresham is not sticky. | Clive is aggressive. | neutral |
Valentina is aggressive.
Clive is every.
Clive is not unsightly.
Chapman is sticky.
Gresham is sticky.
Gresham is every.
Chapman is not fair-minded.
Brian is not sticky.
Gresham is not fair-minded.
Harmony is not unsightly.
Addison is not aggressive.
Valentina is not unsightly.If there is at least one people who is every or not aggressive, then Valentina is not unsightly.
Brian is not beautiful if and only if Clive is not fair-minded.
If there is at least one people who is unsightly, then Clive is not sticky and Chapman is every.
Someone being both fair-minded and sticky is equivalent to being not aggressive and beautiful.
If there is someone who is either unsightly or not beautiful, then Addison is not fair-minded.
If there is someone who is both unsightly and not fair-minded, then Valentina is every.
Someone is not sticky if and only if he is not fair-minded.
If there is someone who is not sticky, then Gresham is not every.
If Addison is not sticky or Gresham is unsightly, then Chapman is aggressive.
Gresham being sticky and Gresham being not fair-minded imply that Addison is not aggressive.
If there is someone who is either beautiful or sticky, then Chapman is not every.
If there is at least one people who is not unsightly or beautiful, then Gresham is not sticky. | Valentina is not unsightly. | entailment |
Valentina is aggressive.
Clive is every.
Clive is not unsightly.
Chapman is sticky.
Gresham is sticky.
Gresham is every.
Chapman is not fair-minded.
Brian is not sticky.
Gresham is not fair-minded.
Harmony is not unsightly.
Addison is not aggressive.
Valentina is not unsightly.If there is at least one people who is every or not aggressive, then Valentina is not unsightly.
Brian is not beautiful if and only if Clive is not fair-minded.
If there is at least one people who is unsightly, then Clive is not sticky and Chapman is every.
Someone being both fair-minded and sticky is equivalent to being not aggressive and beautiful.
If there is someone who is either unsightly or not beautiful, then Addison is not fair-minded.
If there is someone who is both unsightly and not fair-minded, then Valentina is every.
Someone is not sticky if and only if he is not fair-minded.
If there is someone who is not sticky, then Gresham is not every.
If Addison is not sticky or Gresham is unsightly, then Chapman is aggressive.
Gresham being sticky and Gresham being not fair-minded imply that Addison is not aggressive.
If there is someone who is either beautiful or sticky, then Chapman is not every.
If there is at least one people who is not unsightly or beautiful, then Gresham is not sticky. | Chapman is sticky. | self_contradiction |
Valentina is aggressive.
Clive is every.
Clive is not unsightly.
Chapman is sticky.
Gresham is sticky.
Gresham is every.
Chapman is not fair-minded.
Brian is not sticky.
Gresham is not fair-minded.
Harmony is not unsightly.
Addison is not aggressive.
Valentina is not unsightly.If there is at least one people who is every or not aggressive, then Valentina is not unsightly.
Brian is not beautiful if and only if Clive is not fair-minded.
If there is at least one people who is unsightly, then Clive is not sticky and Chapman is every.
Someone being both fair-minded and sticky is equivalent to being not aggressive and beautiful.
If there is someone who is either unsightly or not beautiful, then Addison is not fair-minded.
If there is someone who is both unsightly and not fair-minded, then Valentina is every.
Someone is not sticky if and only if he is not fair-minded.
If there is someone who is not sticky, then Gresham is not every.
If Addison is not sticky or Gresham is unsightly, then Chapman is aggressive.
Gresham being sticky and Gresham being not fair-minded imply that Addison is not aggressive.
If there is someone who is either beautiful or sticky, then Chapman is not every.
If there is at least one people who is not unsightly or beautiful, then Gresham is not sticky. | Valentina is unsightly. | contradiction |
Antonio is not compassionate.
Harris is not unpleasant.
Rupert is not fresh.
Harris is not obnoxious.
Harris is fresh.
Rupert is suitable.
Lincoln is not fresh.
Antonio is not administrative.
Antonio is obnoxious.
Rupert is not obnoxious.
Lincoln is suitable.
Basil is administrative.Rupert being suitable is equivalent to Lincoln being compassionate.
Someone being suitable is equivalent to being obnoxious.
It can be concluded that Sheridan is unpleasant and Basil is not compassionate once knowing that Rupert is obnoxious.
If there is someone who is suitable, then Lincoln is fresh.
Someone who is both administrative and obnoxious is always compassionate.
If someone who is not compassionate is also fresh, then he is suitable.
Someone being both obnoxious and unpleasant is equivalent to being suitable and not administrative.
It can be concluded that Lincoln is suitable once knowing that Basil is obnoxious or Sheridan is not administrative.
Someone is fresh and not administrative if and only if he is suitable.
Hubert being not compassionate or Basil being unpleasant implies that Lincoln is administrative.
Hubert being not compassionate is equivalent to Hubert being unpleasant and Rupert being not administrative.
If all people are suitable, then Hubert is obnoxious and Hubert is fresh. | Hubert is fresh. | neutral |
Antonio is not compassionate.
Harris is not unpleasant.
Rupert is not fresh.
Harris is not obnoxious.
Harris is fresh.
Rupert is suitable.
Lincoln is not fresh.
Antonio is not administrative.
Antonio is obnoxious.
Rupert is not obnoxious.
Lincoln is suitable.
Basil is administrative.Rupert being suitable is equivalent to Lincoln being compassionate.
Someone being suitable is equivalent to being obnoxious.
It can be concluded that Sheridan is unpleasant and Basil is not compassionate once knowing that Rupert is obnoxious.
If there is someone who is suitable, then Lincoln is fresh.
Someone who is both administrative and obnoxious is always compassionate.
If someone who is not compassionate is also fresh, then he is suitable.
Someone being both obnoxious and unpleasant is equivalent to being suitable and not administrative.
It can be concluded that Lincoln is suitable once knowing that Basil is obnoxious or Sheridan is not administrative.
Someone is fresh and not administrative if and only if he is suitable.
Hubert being not compassionate or Basil being unpleasant implies that Lincoln is administrative.
Hubert being not compassionate is equivalent to Hubert being unpleasant and Rupert being not administrative.
If all people are suitable, then Hubert is obnoxious and Hubert is fresh. | Antonio is not unpleasant. | contradiction |
Antonio is not compassionate.
Harris is not unpleasant.
Rupert is not fresh.
Harris is not obnoxious.
Harris is fresh.
Rupert is suitable.
Lincoln is not fresh.
Antonio is not administrative.
Antonio is obnoxious.
Rupert is not obnoxious.
Lincoln is suitable.
Basil is administrative.Rupert being suitable is equivalent to Lincoln being compassionate.
Someone being suitable is equivalent to being obnoxious.
It can be concluded that Sheridan is unpleasant and Basil is not compassionate once knowing that Rupert is obnoxious.
If there is someone who is suitable, then Lincoln is fresh.
Someone who is both administrative and obnoxious is always compassionate.
If someone who is not compassionate is also fresh, then he is suitable.
Someone being both obnoxious and unpleasant is equivalent to being suitable and not administrative.
It can be concluded that Lincoln is suitable once knowing that Basil is obnoxious or Sheridan is not administrative.
Someone is fresh and not administrative if and only if he is suitable.
Hubert being not compassionate or Basil being unpleasant implies that Lincoln is administrative.
Hubert being not compassionate is equivalent to Hubert being unpleasant and Rupert being not administrative.
If all people are suitable, then Hubert is obnoxious and Hubert is fresh. | Lincoln is suitable. | entailment |
Antonio is not compassionate.
Harris is not unpleasant.
Rupert is not fresh.
Harris is not obnoxious.
Harris is fresh.
Rupert is suitable.
Lincoln is not fresh.
Antonio is not administrative.
Antonio is obnoxious.
Rupert is not obnoxious.
Lincoln is suitable.
Basil is administrative.Rupert being suitable is equivalent to Lincoln being compassionate.
Someone being suitable is equivalent to being obnoxious.
It can be concluded that Sheridan is unpleasant and Basil is not compassionate once knowing that Rupert is obnoxious.
If there is someone who is suitable, then Lincoln is fresh.
Someone who is both administrative and obnoxious is always compassionate.
If someone who is not compassionate is also fresh, then he is suitable.
Someone being both obnoxious and unpleasant is equivalent to being suitable and not administrative.
It can be concluded that Lincoln is suitable once knowing that Basil is obnoxious or Sheridan is not administrative.
Someone is fresh and not administrative if and only if he is suitable.
Hubert being not compassionate or Basil being unpleasant implies that Lincoln is administrative.
Hubert being not compassionate is equivalent to Hubert being unpleasant and Rupert being not administrative.
If all people are suitable, then Hubert is obnoxious and Hubert is fresh. | Rupert is not obnoxious. | self_contradiction |
Antonio is not compassionate.
Harris is not unpleasant.
Rupert is not fresh.
Harris is not obnoxious.
Harris is fresh.
Rupert is suitable.
Lincoln is not fresh.
Antonio is not administrative.
Antonio is obnoxious.
Rupert is not obnoxious.
Lincoln is suitable.
Basil is administrative.Rupert being suitable is equivalent to Lincoln being compassionate.
Someone being suitable is equivalent to being obnoxious.
It can be concluded that Sheridan is unpleasant and Basil is not compassionate once knowing that Rupert is obnoxious.
If there is someone who is suitable, then Lincoln is fresh.
Someone who is both administrative and obnoxious is always compassionate.
If someone who is not compassionate is also fresh, then he is suitable.
Someone being both obnoxious and unpleasant is equivalent to being suitable and not administrative.
It can be concluded that Lincoln is suitable once knowing that Basil is obnoxious or Sheridan is not administrative.
Someone is fresh and not administrative if and only if he is suitable.
Hubert being not compassionate or Basil being unpleasant implies that Lincoln is administrative.
Hubert being not compassionate is equivalent to Hubert being unpleasant and Rupert being not administrative.
If all people are suitable, then Hubert is obnoxious and Hubert is fresh. | Basil is not compassionate. | entailment |
Antonio is not compassionate.
Harris is not unpleasant.
Rupert is not fresh.
Harris is not obnoxious.
Harris is fresh.
Rupert is suitable.
Lincoln is not fresh.
Antonio is not administrative.
Antonio is obnoxious.
Rupert is not obnoxious.
Lincoln is suitable.
Basil is administrative.Rupert being suitable is equivalent to Lincoln being compassionate.
Someone being suitable is equivalent to being obnoxious.
It can be concluded that Sheridan is unpleasant and Basil is not compassionate once knowing that Rupert is obnoxious.
If there is someone who is suitable, then Lincoln is fresh.
Someone who is both administrative and obnoxious is always compassionate.
If someone who is not compassionate is also fresh, then he is suitable.
Someone being both obnoxious and unpleasant is equivalent to being suitable and not administrative.
It can be concluded that Lincoln is suitable once knowing that Basil is obnoxious or Sheridan is not administrative.
Someone is fresh and not administrative if and only if he is suitable.
Hubert being not compassionate or Basil being unpleasant implies that Lincoln is administrative.
Hubert being not compassionate is equivalent to Hubert being unpleasant and Rupert being not administrative.
If all people are suitable, then Hubert is obnoxious and Hubert is fresh. | Rupert is not compassionate. | neutral |
Antonio is not compassionate.
Harris is not unpleasant.
Rupert is not fresh.
Harris is not obnoxious.
Harris is fresh.
Rupert is suitable.
Lincoln is not fresh.
Antonio is not administrative.
Antonio is obnoxious.
Rupert is not obnoxious.
Lincoln is suitable.
Basil is administrative.Rupert being suitable is equivalent to Lincoln being compassionate.
Someone being suitable is equivalent to being obnoxious.
It can be concluded that Sheridan is unpleasant and Basil is not compassionate once knowing that Rupert is obnoxious.
If there is someone who is suitable, then Lincoln is fresh.
Someone who is both administrative and obnoxious is always compassionate.
If someone who is not compassionate is also fresh, then he is suitable.
Someone being both obnoxious and unpleasant is equivalent to being suitable and not administrative.
It can be concluded that Lincoln is suitable once knowing that Basil is obnoxious or Sheridan is not administrative.
Someone is fresh and not administrative if and only if he is suitable.
Hubert being not compassionate or Basil being unpleasant implies that Lincoln is administrative.
Hubert being not compassionate is equivalent to Hubert being unpleasant and Rupert being not administrative.
If all people are suitable, then Hubert is obnoxious and Hubert is fresh. | Lincoln is not fresh. | self_contradiction |
Antonio is not compassionate.
Harris is not unpleasant.
Rupert is not fresh.
Harris is not obnoxious.
Harris is fresh.
Rupert is suitable.
Lincoln is not fresh.
Antonio is not administrative.
Antonio is obnoxious.
Rupert is not obnoxious.
Lincoln is suitable.
Basil is administrative.Rupert being suitable is equivalent to Lincoln being compassionate.
Someone being suitable is equivalent to being obnoxious.
It can be concluded that Sheridan is unpleasant and Basil is not compassionate once knowing that Rupert is obnoxious.
If there is someone who is suitable, then Lincoln is fresh.
Someone who is both administrative and obnoxious is always compassionate.
If someone who is not compassionate is also fresh, then he is suitable.
Someone being both obnoxious and unpleasant is equivalent to being suitable and not administrative.
It can be concluded that Lincoln is suitable once knowing that Basil is obnoxious or Sheridan is not administrative.
Someone is fresh and not administrative if and only if he is suitable.
Hubert being not compassionate or Basil being unpleasant implies that Lincoln is administrative.
Hubert being not compassionate is equivalent to Hubert being unpleasant and Rupert being not administrative.
If all people are suitable, then Hubert is obnoxious and Hubert is fresh. | Basil is not administrative. | contradiction |
Antonio is not compassionate.
Harris is not unpleasant.
Rupert is not fresh.
Harris is not obnoxious.
Harris is fresh.
Rupert is suitable.
Lincoln is not fresh.
Antonio is not administrative.
Antonio is obnoxious.
Rupert is not obnoxious.
Lincoln is suitable.
Basil is administrative.Rupert being suitable is equivalent to Lincoln being compassionate.
Someone being suitable is equivalent to being obnoxious.
It can be concluded that Sheridan is unpleasant and Basil is not compassionate once knowing that Rupert is obnoxious.
If there is someone who is suitable, then Lincoln is fresh.
Someone who is both administrative and obnoxious is always compassionate.
If someone who is not compassionate is also fresh, then he is suitable.
Someone being both obnoxious and unpleasant is equivalent to being suitable and not administrative.
It can be concluded that Lincoln is suitable once knowing that Basil is obnoxious or Sheridan is not administrative.
Someone is fresh and not administrative if and only if he is suitable.
Hubert being not compassionate or Basil being unpleasant implies that Lincoln is administrative.
Hubert being not compassionate is equivalent to Hubert being unpleasant and Rupert being not administrative.
If all people are suitable, then Hubert is obnoxious and Hubert is fresh. | Antonio is not fresh. | contradiction |
Antonio is not compassionate.
Harris is not unpleasant.
Rupert is not fresh.
Harris is not obnoxious.
Harris is fresh.
Rupert is suitable.
Lincoln is not fresh.
Antonio is not administrative.
Antonio is obnoxious.
Rupert is not obnoxious.
Lincoln is suitable.
Basil is administrative.Rupert being suitable is equivalent to Lincoln being compassionate.
Someone being suitable is equivalent to being obnoxious.
It can be concluded that Sheridan is unpleasant and Basil is not compassionate once knowing that Rupert is obnoxious.
If there is someone who is suitable, then Lincoln is fresh.
Someone who is both administrative and obnoxious is always compassionate.
If someone who is not compassionate is also fresh, then he is suitable.
Someone being both obnoxious and unpleasant is equivalent to being suitable and not administrative.
It can be concluded that Lincoln is suitable once knowing that Basil is obnoxious or Sheridan is not administrative.
Someone is fresh and not administrative if and only if he is suitable.
Hubert being not compassionate or Basil being unpleasant implies that Lincoln is administrative.
Hubert being not compassionate is equivalent to Hubert being unpleasant and Rupert being not administrative.
If all people are suitable, then Hubert is obnoxious and Hubert is fresh. | Rupert is unpleasant. | entailment |
Antonio is not compassionate.
Harris is not unpleasant.
Rupert is not fresh.
Harris is not obnoxious.
Harris is fresh.
Rupert is suitable.
Lincoln is not fresh.
Antonio is not administrative.
Antonio is obnoxious.
Rupert is not obnoxious.
Lincoln is suitable.
Basil is administrative.Rupert being suitable is equivalent to Lincoln being compassionate.
Someone being suitable is equivalent to being obnoxious.
It can be concluded that Sheridan is unpleasant and Basil is not compassionate once knowing that Rupert is obnoxious.
If there is someone who is suitable, then Lincoln is fresh.
Someone who is both administrative and obnoxious is always compassionate.
If someone who is not compassionate is also fresh, then he is suitable.
Someone being both obnoxious and unpleasant is equivalent to being suitable and not administrative.
It can be concluded that Lincoln is suitable once knowing that Basil is obnoxious or Sheridan is not administrative.
Someone is fresh and not administrative if and only if he is suitable.
Hubert being not compassionate or Basil being unpleasant implies that Lincoln is administrative.
Hubert being not compassionate is equivalent to Hubert being unpleasant and Rupert being not administrative.
If all people are suitable, then Hubert is obnoxious and Hubert is fresh. | Sheridan is compassionate. | neutral |
Antonio is not compassionate.
Harris is not unpleasant.
Rupert is not fresh.
Harris is not obnoxious.
Harris is fresh.
Rupert is suitable.
Lincoln is not fresh.
Antonio is not administrative.
Antonio is obnoxious.
Rupert is not obnoxious.
Lincoln is suitable.
Basil is administrative.Rupert being suitable is equivalent to Lincoln being compassionate.
Someone being suitable is equivalent to being obnoxious.
It can be concluded that Sheridan is unpleasant and Basil is not compassionate once knowing that Rupert is obnoxious.
If there is someone who is suitable, then Lincoln is fresh.
Someone who is both administrative and obnoxious is always compassionate.
If someone who is not compassionate is also fresh, then he is suitable.
Someone being both obnoxious and unpleasant is equivalent to being suitable and not administrative.
It can be concluded that Lincoln is suitable once knowing that Basil is obnoxious or Sheridan is not administrative.
Someone is fresh and not administrative if and only if he is suitable.
Hubert being not compassionate or Basil being unpleasant implies that Lincoln is administrative.
Hubert being not compassionate is equivalent to Hubert being unpleasant and Rupert being not administrative.
If all people are suitable, then Hubert is obnoxious and Hubert is fresh. | Basil is fresh. | neutral |
Antonio is not compassionate.
Harris is not unpleasant.
Rupert is not fresh.
Harris is not obnoxious.
Harris is fresh.
Rupert is suitable.
Lincoln is not fresh.
Antonio is not administrative.
Antonio is obnoxious.
Rupert is not obnoxious.
Lincoln is suitable.
Basil is administrative.Rupert being suitable is equivalent to Lincoln being compassionate.
Someone being suitable is equivalent to being obnoxious.
It can be concluded that Sheridan is unpleasant and Basil is not compassionate once knowing that Rupert is obnoxious.
If there is someone who is suitable, then Lincoln is fresh.
Someone who is both administrative and obnoxious is always compassionate.
If someone who is not compassionate is also fresh, then he is suitable.
Someone being both obnoxious and unpleasant is equivalent to being suitable and not administrative.
It can be concluded that Lincoln is suitable once knowing that Basil is obnoxious or Sheridan is not administrative.
Someone is fresh and not administrative if and only if he is suitable.
Hubert being not compassionate or Basil being unpleasant implies that Lincoln is administrative.
Hubert being not compassionate is equivalent to Hubert being unpleasant and Rupert being not administrative.
If all people are suitable, then Hubert is obnoxious and Hubert is fresh. | Lincoln is not obnoxious. | contradiction |
Antonio is not compassionate.
Harris is not unpleasant.
Rupert is not fresh.
Harris is not obnoxious.
Harris is fresh.
Rupert is suitable.
Lincoln is not fresh.
Antonio is not administrative.
Antonio is obnoxious.
Rupert is not obnoxious.
Lincoln is suitable.
Basil is administrative.Rupert being suitable is equivalent to Lincoln being compassionate.
Someone being suitable is equivalent to being obnoxious.
It can be concluded that Sheridan is unpleasant and Basil is not compassionate once knowing that Rupert is obnoxious.
If there is someone who is suitable, then Lincoln is fresh.
Someone who is both administrative and obnoxious is always compassionate.
If someone who is not compassionate is also fresh, then he is suitable.
Someone being both obnoxious and unpleasant is equivalent to being suitable and not administrative.
It can be concluded that Lincoln is suitable once knowing that Basil is obnoxious or Sheridan is not administrative.
Someone is fresh and not administrative if and only if he is suitable.
Hubert being not compassionate or Basil being unpleasant implies that Lincoln is administrative.
Hubert being not compassionate is equivalent to Hubert being unpleasant and Rupert being not administrative.
If all people are suitable, then Hubert is obnoxious and Hubert is fresh. | Rupert is not administrative. | entailment |
Antonio is not compassionate.
Harris is not unpleasant.
Rupert is not fresh.
Harris is not obnoxious.
Harris is fresh.
Rupert is suitable.
Lincoln is not fresh.
Antonio is not administrative.
Antonio is obnoxious.
Rupert is not obnoxious.
Lincoln is suitable.
Basil is administrative.Rupert being suitable is equivalent to Lincoln being compassionate.
Someone being suitable is equivalent to being obnoxious.
It can be concluded that Sheridan is unpleasant and Basil is not compassionate once knowing that Rupert is obnoxious.
If there is someone who is suitable, then Lincoln is fresh.
Someone who is both administrative and obnoxious is always compassionate.
If someone who is not compassionate is also fresh, then he is suitable.
Someone being both obnoxious and unpleasant is equivalent to being suitable and not administrative.
It can be concluded that Lincoln is suitable once knowing that Basil is obnoxious or Sheridan is not administrative.
Someone is fresh and not administrative if and only if he is suitable.
Hubert being not compassionate or Basil being unpleasant implies that Lincoln is administrative.
Hubert being not compassionate is equivalent to Hubert being unpleasant and Rupert being not administrative.
If all people are suitable, then Hubert is obnoxious and Hubert is fresh. | Lincoln is fresh. | self_contradiction |
Antonio is not compassionate.
Harris is not unpleasant.
Rupert is not fresh.
Harris is not obnoxious.
Harris is fresh.
Rupert is suitable.
Lincoln is not fresh.
Antonio is not administrative.
Antonio is obnoxious.
Rupert is not obnoxious.
Lincoln is suitable.
Basil is administrative.Rupert being suitable is equivalent to Lincoln being compassionate.
Someone being suitable is equivalent to being obnoxious.
It can be concluded that Sheridan is unpleasant and Basil is not compassionate once knowing that Rupert is obnoxious.
If there is someone who is suitable, then Lincoln is fresh.
Someone who is both administrative and obnoxious is always compassionate.
If someone who is not compassionate is also fresh, then he is suitable.
Someone being both obnoxious and unpleasant is equivalent to being suitable and not administrative.
It can be concluded that Lincoln is suitable once knowing that Basil is obnoxious or Sheridan is not administrative.
Someone is fresh and not administrative if and only if he is suitable.
Hubert being not compassionate or Basil being unpleasant implies that Lincoln is administrative.
Hubert being not compassionate is equivalent to Hubert being unpleasant and Rupert being not administrative.
If all people are suitable, then Hubert is obnoxious and Hubert is fresh. | Rupert is fresh. | self_contradiction |
Antonio is not compassionate.
Harris is not unpleasant.
Rupert is not fresh.
Harris is not obnoxious.
Harris is fresh.
Rupert is suitable.
Lincoln is not fresh.
Antonio is not administrative.
Antonio is obnoxious.
Rupert is not obnoxious.
Lincoln is suitable.
Basil is administrative.Rupert being suitable is equivalent to Lincoln being compassionate.
Someone being suitable is equivalent to being obnoxious.
It can be concluded that Sheridan is unpleasant and Basil is not compassionate once knowing that Rupert is obnoxious.
If there is someone who is suitable, then Lincoln is fresh.
Someone who is both administrative and obnoxious is always compassionate.
If someone who is not compassionate is also fresh, then he is suitable.
Someone being both obnoxious and unpleasant is equivalent to being suitable and not administrative.
It can be concluded that Lincoln is suitable once knowing that Basil is obnoxious or Sheridan is not administrative.
Someone is fresh and not administrative if and only if he is suitable.
Hubert being not compassionate or Basil being unpleasant implies that Lincoln is administrative.
Hubert being not compassionate is equivalent to Hubert being unpleasant and Rupert being not administrative.
If all people are suitable, then Hubert is obnoxious and Hubert is fresh. | Antonio is not administrative. | entailment |
Antonio is not compassionate.
Harris is not unpleasant.
Rupert is not fresh.
Harris is not obnoxious.
Harris is fresh.
Rupert is suitable.
Lincoln is not fresh.
Antonio is not administrative.
Antonio is obnoxious.
Rupert is not obnoxious.
Lincoln is suitable.
Basil is administrative.Rupert being suitable is equivalent to Lincoln being compassionate.
Someone being suitable is equivalent to being obnoxious.
It can be concluded that Sheridan is unpleasant and Basil is not compassionate once knowing that Rupert is obnoxious.
If there is someone who is suitable, then Lincoln is fresh.
Someone who is both administrative and obnoxious is always compassionate.
If someone who is not compassionate is also fresh, then he is suitable.
Someone being both obnoxious and unpleasant is equivalent to being suitable and not administrative.
It can be concluded that Lincoln is suitable once knowing that Basil is obnoxious or Sheridan is not administrative.
Someone is fresh and not administrative if and only if he is suitable.
Hubert being not compassionate or Basil being unpleasant implies that Lincoln is administrative.
Hubert being not compassionate is equivalent to Hubert being unpleasant and Rupert being not administrative.
If all people are suitable, then Hubert is obnoxious and Hubert is fresh. | Sheridan is fresh. | neutral |
Antonio is not compassionate.
Harris is not unpleasant.
Rupert is not fresh.
Harris is not obnoxious.
Harris is fresh.
Rupert is suitable.
Lincoln is not fresh.
Antonio is not administrative.
Antonio is obnoxious.
Rupert is not obnoxious.
Lincoln is suitable.
Basil is administrative.Rupert being suitable is equivalent to Lincoln being compassionate.
Someone being suitable is equivalent to being obnoxious.
It can be concluded that Sheridan is unpleasant and Basil is not compassionate once knowing that Rupert is obnoxious.
If there is someone who is suitable, then Lincoln is fresh.
Someone who is both administrative and obnoxious is always compassionate.
If someone who is not compassionate is also fresh, then he is suitable.
Someone being both obnoxious and unpleasant is equivalent to being suitable and not administrative.
It can be concluded that Lincoln is suitable once knowing that Basil is obnoxious or Sheridan is not administrative.
Someone is fresh and not administrative if and only if he is suitable.
Hubert being not compassionate or Basil being unpleasant implies that Lincoln is administrative.
Hubert being not compassionate is equivalent to Hubert being unpleasant and Rupert being not administrative.
If all people are suitable, then Hubert is obnoxious and Hubert is fresh. | Rupert is obnoxious. | self_contradiction |
Antonio is not compassionate.
Harris is not unpleasant.
Rupert is not fresh.
Harris is not obnoxious.
Harris is fresh.
Rupert is suitable.
Lincoln is not fresh.
Antonio is not administrative.
Antonio is obnoxious.
Rupert is not obnoxious.
Lincoln is suitable.
Basil is administrative.Rupert being suitable is equivalent to Lincoln being compassionate.
Someone being suitable is equivalent to being obnoxious.
It can be concluded that Sheridan is unpleasant and Basil is not compassionate once knowing that Rupert is obnoxious.
If there is someone who is suitable, then Lincoln is fresh.
Someone who is both administrative and obnoxious is always compassionate.
If someone who is not compassionate is also fresh, then he is suitable.
Someone being both obnoxious and unpleasant is equivalent to being suitable and not administrative.
It can be concluded that Lincoln is suitable once knowing that Basil is obnoxious or Sheridan is not administrative.
Someone is fresh and not administrative if and only if he is suitable.
Hubert being not compassionate or Basil being unpleasant implies that Lincoln is administrative.
Hubert being not compassionate is equivalent to Hubert being unpleasant and Rupert being not administrative.
If all people are suitable, then Hubert is obnoxious and Hubert is fresh. | Basil is compassionate. | contradiction |
Sandy is happy.
Clifford is not attentive.
Marlon is not difficult.
Marlon is historical.
Dave is not difficult.
Dave is misty.
Hunter is not legal.
Amos is historical.
Bruce is not attentive.
Bruce is difficult.
Amos is legal.
Amos is happy.Someone being difficult is equivalent to being not misty.
Someone who is historical is always misty.
If Clifford is not legal, then Bruce is historical and Clifford is not attentive, and vice versa.
If someone is not attentive and misty, then he is both not difficult and not happy, and vice versa.
Hunter being legal is equivalent to Amos being historical.
If Dave is legal or Sandy is not happy, then Dave is not attentive.
Hunter being difficult or Clifford being attentive implies that Clifford is historical.
If there is someone who is both legal and not difficult, then Amos is not historical.
If someone is not historical and not attentive, then he is both difficult and misty, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not legal, then Marlon is attentive and Amos is difficult.
If there is at least one people who is either happy or not difficult, then Amos is attentive and Bruce is not legal.
If there is someone who is misty, then Bruce is not historical. | Bruce is not attentive. | entailment |
Sandy is happy.
Clifford is not attentive.
Marlon is not difficult.
Marlon is historical.
Dave is not difficult.
Dave is misty.
Hunter is not legal.
Amos is historical.
Bruce is not attentive.
Bruce is difficult.
Amos is legal.
Amos is happy.Someone being difficult is equivalent to being not misty.
Someone who is historical is always misty.
If Clifford is not legal, then Bruce is historical and Clifford is not attentive, and vice versa.
If someone is not attentive and misty, then he is both not difficult and not happy, and vice versa.
Hunter being legal is equivalent to Amos being historical.
If Dave is legal or Sandy is not happy, then Dave is not attentive.
Hunter being difficult or Clifford being attentive implies that Clifford is historical.
If there is someone who is both legal and not difficult, then Amos is not historical.
If someone is not historical and not attentive, then he is both difficult and misty, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not legal, then Marlon is attentive and Amos is difficult.
If there is at least one people who is either happy or not difficult, then Amos is attentive and Bruce is not legal.
If there is someone who is misty, then Bruce is not historical. | Clifford is not difficult. | neutral |
Sandy is happy.
Clifford is not attentive.
Marlon is not difficult.
Marlon is historical.
Dave is not difficult.
Dave is misty.
Hunter is not legal.
Amos is historical.
Bruce is not attentive.
Bruce is difficult.
Amos is legal.
Amos is happy.Someone being difficult is equivalent to being not misty.
Someone who is historical is always misty.
If Clifford is not legal, then Bruce is historical and Clifford is not attentive, and vice versa.
If someone is not attentive and misty, then he is both not difficult and not happy, and vice versa.
Hunter being legal is equivalent to Amos being historical.
If Dave is legal or Sandy is not happy, then Dave is not attentive.
Hunter being difficult or Clifford being attentive implies that Clifford is historical.
If there is someone who is both legal and not difficult, then Amos is not historical.
If someone is not historical and not attentive, then he is both difficult and misty, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not legal, then Marlon is attentive and Amos is difficult.
If there is at least one people who is either happy or not difficult, then Amos is attentive and Bruce is not legal.
If there is someone who is misty, then Bruce is not historical. | Hunter is difficult. | neutral |
Sandy is happy.
Clifford is not attentive.
Marlon is not difficult.
Marlon is historical.
Dave is not difficult.
Dave is misty.
Hunter is not legal.
Amos is historical.
Bruce is not attentive.
Bruce is difficult.
Amos is legal.
Amos is happy.Someone being difficult is equivalent to being not misty.
Someone who is historical is always misty.
If Clifford is not legal, then Bruce is historical and Clifford is not attentive, and vice versa.
If someone is not attentive and misty, then he is both not difficult and not happy, and vice versa.
Hunter being legal is equivalent to Amos being historical.
If Dave is legal or Sandy is not happy, then Dave is not attentive.
Hunter being difficult or Clifford being attentive implies that Clifford is historical.
If there is someone who is both legal and not difficult, then Amos is not historical.
If someone is not historical and not attentive, then he is both difficult and misty, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not legal, then Marlon is attentive and Amos is difficult.
If there is at least one people who is either happy or not difficult, then Amos is attentive and Bruce is not legal.
If there is someone who is misty, then Bruce is not historical. | Dave is not difficult. | entailment |
Sandy is happy.
Clifford is not attentive.
Marlon is not difficult.
Marlon is historical.
Dave is not difficult.
Dave is misty.
Hunter is not legal.
Amos is historical.
Bruce is not attentive.
Bruce is difficult.
Amos is legal.
Amos is happy.Someone being difficult is equivalent to being not misty.
Someone who is historical is always misty.
If Clifford is not legal, then Bruce is historical and Clifford is not attentive, and vice versa.
If someone is not attentive and misty, then he is both not difficult and not happy, and vice versa.
Hunter being legal is equivalent to Amos being historical.
If Dave is legal or Sandy is not happy, then Dave is not attentive.
Hunter being difficult or Clifford being attentive implies that Clifford is historical.
If there is someone who is both legal and not difficult, then Amos is not historical.
If someone is not historical and not attentive, then he is both difficult and misty, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not legal, then Marlon is attentive and Amos is difficult.
If there is at least one people who is either happy or not difficult, then Amos is attentive and Bruce is not legal.
If there is someone who is misty, then Bruce is not historical. | Clifford is happy. | neutral |
Sandy is happy.
Clifford is not attentive.
Marlon is not difficult.
Marlon is historical.
Dave is not difficult.
Dave is misty.
Hunter is not legal.
Amos is historical.
Bruce is not attentive.
Bruce is difficult.
Amos is legal.
Amos is happy.Someone being difficult is equivalent to being not misty.
Someone who is historical is always misty.
If Clifford is not legal, then Bruce is historical and Clifford is not attentive, and vice versa.
If someone is not attentive and misty, then he is both not difficult and not happy, and vice versa.
Hunter being legal is equivalent to Amos being historical.
If Dave is legal or Sandy is not happy, then Dave is not attentive.
Hunter being difficult or Clifford being attentive implies that Clifford is historical.
If there is someone who is both legal and not difficult, then Amos is not historical.
If someone is not historical and not attentive, then he is both difficult and misty, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not legal, then Marlon is attentive and Amos is difficult.
If there is at least one people who is either happy or not difficult, then Amos is attentive and Bruce is not legal.
If there is someone who is misty, then Bruce is not historical. | Sandy is happy. | entailment |
Sandy is happy.
Clifford is not attentive.
Marlon is not difficult.
Marlon is historical.
Dave is not difficult.
Dave is misty.
Hunter is not legal.
Amos is historical.
Bruce is not attentive.
Bruce is difficult.
Amos is legal.
Amos is happy.Someone being difficult is equivalent to being not misty.
Someone who is historical is always misty.
If Clifford is not legal, then Bruce is historical and Clifford is not attentive, and vice versa.
If someone is not attentive and misty, then he is both not difficult and not happy, and vice versa.
Hunter being legal is equivalent to Amos being historical.
If Dave is legal or Sandy is not happy, then Dave is not attentive.
Hunter being difficult or Clifford being attentive implies that Clifford is historical.
If there is someone who is both legal and not difficult, then Amos is not historical.
If someone is not historical and not attentive, then he is both difficult and misty, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not legal, then Marlon is attentive and Amos is difficult.
If there is at least one people who is either happy or not difficult, then Amos is attentive and Bruce is not legal.
If there is someone who is misty, then Bruce is not historical. | Amos is misty. | self_contradiction |
Sandy is happy.
Clifford is not attentive.
Marlon is not difficult.
Marlon is historical.
Dave is not difficult.
Dave is misty.
Hunter is not legal.
Amos is historical.
Bruce is not attentive.
Bruce is difficult.
Amos is legal.
Amos is happy.Someone being difficult is equivalent to being not misty.
Someone who is historical is always misty.
If Clifford is not legal, then Bruce is historical and Clifford is not attentive, and vice versa.
If someone is not attentive and misty, then he is both not difficult and not happy, and vice versa.
Hunter being legal is equivalent to Amos being historical.
If Dave is legal or Sandy is not happy, then Dave is not attentive.
Hunter being difficult or Clifford being attentive implies that Clifford is historical.
If there is someone who is both legal and not difficult, then Amos is not historical.
If someone is not historical and not attentive, then he is both difficult and misty, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not legal, then Marlon is attentive and Amos is difficult.
If there is at least one people who is either happy or not difficult, then Amos is attentive and Bruce is not legal.
If there is someone who is misty, then Bruce is not historical. | Bruce is happy. | contradiction |
Sandy is happy.
Clifford is not attentive.
Marlon is not difficult.
Marlon is historical.
Dave is not difficult.
Dave is misty.
Hunter is not legal.
Amos is historical.
Bruce is not attentive.
Bruce is difficult.
Amos is legal.
Amos is happy.Someone being difficult is equivalent to being not misty.
Someone who is historical is always misty.
If Clifford is not legal, then Bruce is historical and Clifford is not attentive, and vice versa.
If someone is not attentive and misty, then he is both not difficult and not happy, and vice versa.
Hunter being legal is equivalent to Amos being historical.
If Dave is legal or Sandy is not happy, then Dave is not attentive.
Hunter being difficult or Clifford being attentive implies that Clifford is historical.
If there is someone who is both legal and not difficult, then Amos is not historical.
If someone is not historical and not attentive, then he is both difficult and misty, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not legal, then Marlon is attentive and Amos is difficult.
If there is at least one people who is either happy or not difficult, then Amos is attentive and Bruce is not legal.
If there is someone who is misty, then Bruce is not historical. | Marlon is not attentive. | contradiction |
Sandy is happy.
Clifford is not attentive.
Marlon is not difficult.
Marlon is historical.
Dave is not difficult.
Dave is misty.
Hunter is not legal.
Amos is historical.
Bruce is not attentive.
Bruce is difficult.
Amos is legal.
Amos is happy.Someone being difficult is equivalent to being not misty.
Someone who is historical is always misty.
If Clifford is not legal, then Bruce is historical and Clifford is not attentive, and vice versa.
If someone is not attentive and misty, then he is both not difficult and not happy, and vice versa.
Hunter being legal is equivalent to Amos being historical.
If Dave is legal or Sandy is not happy, then Dave is not attentive.
Hunter being difficult or Clifford being attentive implies that Clifford is historical.
If there is someone who is both legal and not difficult, then Amos is not historical.
If someone is not historical and not attentive, then he is both difficult and misty, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not legal, then Marlon is attentive and Amos is difficult.
If there is at least one people who is either happy or not difficult, then Amos is attentive and Bruce is not legal.
If there is someone who is misty, then Bruce is not historical. | Bruce is not difficult. | self_contradiction |
Sandy is happy.
Clifford is not attentive.
Marlon is not difficult.
Marlon is historical.
Dave is not difficult.
Dave is misty.
Hunter is not legal.
Amos is historical.
Bruce is not attentive.
Bruce is difficult.
Amos is legal.
Amos is happy.Someone being difficult is equivalent to being not misty.
Someone who is historical is always misty.
If Clifford is not legal, then Bruce is historical and Clifford is not attentive, and vice versa.
If someone is not attentive and misty, then he is both not difficult and not happy, and vice versa.
Hunter being legal is equivalent to Amos being historical.
If Dave is legal or Sandy is not happy, then Dave is not attentive.
Hunter being difficult or Clifford being attentive implies that Clifford is historical.
If there is someone who is both legal and not difficult, then Amos is not historical.
If someone is not historical and not attentive, then he is both difficult and misty, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not legal, then Marlon is attentive and Amos is difficult.
If there is at least one people who is either happy or not difficult, then Amos is attentive and Bruce is not legal.
If there is someone who is misty, then Bruce is not historical. | Marlon is not historical. | contradiction |
Sandy is happy.
Clifford is not attentive.
Marlon is not difficult.
Marlon is historical.
Dave is not difficult.
Dave is misty.
Hunter is not legal.
Amos is historical.
Bruce is not attentive.
Bruce is difficult.
Amos is legal.
Amos is happy.Someone being difficult is equivalent to being not misty.
Someone who is historical is always misty.
If Clifford is not legal, then Bruce is historical and Clifford is not attentive, and vice versa.
If someone is not attentive and misty, then he is both not difficult and not happy, and vice versa.
Hunter being legal is equivalent to Amos being historical.
If Dave is legal or Sandy is not happy, then Dave is not attentive.
Hunter being difficult or Clifford being attentive implies that Clifford is historical.
If there is someone who is both legal and not difficult, then Amos is not historical.
If someone is not historical and not attentive, then he is both difficult and misty, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not legal, then Marlon is attentive and Amos is difficult.
If there is at least one people who is either happy or not difficult, then Amos is attentive and Bruce is not legal.
If there is someone who is misty, then Bruce is not historical. | Marlon is not happy. | neutral |
Sandy is happy.
Clifford is not attentive.
Marlon is not difficult.
Marlon is historical.
Dave is not difficult.
Dave is misty.
Hunter is not legal.
Amos is historical.
Bruce is not attentive.
Bruce is difficult.
Amos is legal.
Amos is happy.Someone being difficult is equivalent to being not misty.
Someone who is historical is always misty.
If Clifford is not legal, then Bruce is historical and Clifford is not attentive, and vice versa.
If someone is not attentive and misty, then he is both not difficult and not happy, and vice versa.
Hunter being legal is equivalent to Amos being historical.
If Dave is legal or Sandy is not happy, then Dave is not attentive.
Hunter being difficult or Clifford being attentive implies that Clifford is historical.
If there is someone who is both legal and not difficult, then Amos is not historical.
If someone is not historical and not attentive, then he is both difficult and misty, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not legal, then Marlon is attentive and Amos is difficult.
If there is at least one people who is either happy or not difficult, then Amos is attentive and Bruce is not legal.
If there is someone who is misty, then Bruce is not historical. | Sandy is not happy. | contradiction |
Sandy is happy.
Clifford is not attentive.
Marlon is not difficult.
Marlon is historical.
Dave is not difficult.
Dave is misty.
Hunter is not legal.
Amos is historical.
Bruce is not attentive.
Bruce is difficult.
Amos is legal.
Amos is happy.Someone being difficult is equivalent to being not misty.
Someone who is historical is always misty.
If Clifford is not legal, then Bruce is historical and Clifford is not attentive, and vice versa.
If someone is not attentive and misty, then he is both not difficult and not happy, and vice versa.
Hunter being legal is equivalent to Amos being historical.
If Dave is legal or Sandy is not happy, then Dave is not attentive.
Hunter being difficult or Clifford being attentive implies that Clifford is historical.
If there is someone who is both legal and not difficult, then Amos is not historical.
If someone is not historical and not attentive, then he is both difficult and misty, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not legal, then Marlon is attentive and Amos is difficult.
If there is at least one people who is either happy or not difficult, then Amos is attentive and Bruce is not legal.
If there is someone who is misty, then Bruce is not historical. | Marlon is attentive. | entailment |
Sandy is happy.
Clifford is not attentive.
Marlon is not difficult.
Marlon is historical.
Dave is not difficult.
Dave is misty.
Hunter is not legal.
Amos is historical.
Bruce is not attentive.
Bruce is difficult.
Amos is legal.
Amos is happy.Someone being difficult is equivalent to being not misty.
Someone who is historical is always misty.
If Clifford is not legal, then Bruce is historical and Clifford is not attentive, and vice versa.
If someone is not attentive and misty, then he is both not difficult and not happy, and vice versa.
Hunter being legal is equivalent to Amos being historical.
If Dave is legal or Sandy is not happy, then Dave is not attentive.
Hunter being difficult or Clifford being attentive implies that Clifford is historical.
If there is someone who is both legal and not difficult, then Amos is not historical.
If someone is not historical and not attentive, then he is both difficult and misty, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not legal, then Marlon is attentive and Amos is difficult.
If there is at least one people who is either happy or not difficult, then Amos is attentive and Bruce is not legal.
If there is someone who is misty, then Bruce is not historical. | Marlon is difficult. | contradiction |
Sandy is happy.
Clifford is not attentive.
Marlon is not difficult.
Marlon is historical.
Dave is not difficult.
Dave is misty.
Hunter is not legal.
Amos is historical.
Bruce is not attentive.
Bruce is difficult.
Amos is legal.
Amos is happy.Someone being difficult is equivalent to being not misty.
Someone who is historical is always misty.
If Clifford is not legal, then Bruce is historical and Clifford is not attentive, and vice versa.
If someone is not attentive and misty, then he is both not difficult and not happy, and vice versa.
Hunter being legal is equivalent to Amos being historical.
If Dave is legal or Sandy is not happy, then Dave is not attentive.
Hunter being difficult or Clifford being attentive implies that Clifford is historical.
If there is someone who is both legal and not difficult, then Amos is not historical.
If someone is not historical and not attentive, then he is both difficult and misty, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not legal, then Marlon is attentive and Amos is difficult.
If there is at least one people who is either happy or not difficult, then Amos is attentive and Bruce is not legal.
If there is someone who is misty, then Bruce is not historical. | Amos is not misty. | self_contradiction |
Sandy is happy.
Clifford is not attentive.
Marlon is not difficult.
Marlon is historical.
Dave is not difficult.
Dave is misty.
Hunter is not legal.
Amos is historical.
Bruce is not attentive.
Bruce is difficult.
Amos is legal.
Amos is happy.Someone being difficult is equivalent to being not misty.
Someone who is historical is always misty.
If Clifford is not legal, then Bruce is historical and Clifford is not attentive, and vice versa.
If someone is not attentive and misty, then he is both not difficult and not happy, and vice versa.
Hunter being legal is equivalent to Amos being historical.
If Dave is legal or Sandy is not happy, then Dave is not attentive.
Hunter being difficult or Clifford being attentive implies that Clifford is historical.
If there is someone who is both legal and not difficult, then Amos is not historical.
If someone is not historical and not attentive, then he is both difficult and misty, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not legal, then Marlon is attentive and Amos is difficult.
If there is at least one people who is either happy or not difficult, then Amos is attentive and Bruce is not legal.
If there is someone who is misty, then Bruce is not historical. | Dave is not legal. | neutral |
Sandy is happy.
Clifford is not attentive.
Marlon is not difficult.
Marlon is historical.
Dave is not difficult.
Dave is misty.
Hunter is not legal.
Amos is historical.
Bruce is not attentive.
Bruce is difficult.
Amos is legal.
Amos is happy.Someone being difficult is equivalent to being not misty.
Someone who is historical is always misty.
If Clifford is not legal, then Bruce is historical and Clifford is not attentive, and vice versa.
If someone is not attentive and misty, then he is both not difficult and not happy, and vice versa.
Hunter being legal is equivalent to Amos being historical.
If Dave is legal or Sandy is not happy, then Dave is not attentive.
Hunter being difficult or Clifford being attentive implies that Clifford is historical.
If there is someone who is both legal and not difficult, then Amos is not historical.
If someone is not historical and not attentive, then he is both difficult and misty, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not legal, then Marlon is attentive and Amos is difficult.
If there is at least one people who is either happy or not difficult, then Amos is attentive and Bruce is not legal.
If there is someone who is misty, then Bruce is not historical. | Amos is not difficult. | self_contradiction |
Sandy is happy.
Clifford is not attentive.
Marlon is not difficult.
Marlon is historical.
Dave is not difficult.
Dave is misty.
Hunter is not legal.
Amos is historical.
Bruce is not attentive.
Bruce is difficult.
Amos is legal.
Amos is happy.Someone being difficult is equivalent to being not misty.
Someone who is historical is always misty.
If Clifford is not legal, then Bruce is historical and Clifford is not attentive, and vice versa.
If someone is not attentive and misty, then he is both not difficult and not happy, and vice versa.
Hunter being legal is equivalent to Amos being historical.
If Dave is legal or Sandy is not happy, then Dave is not attentive.
Hunter being difficult or Clifford being attentive implies that Clifford is historical.
If there is someone who is both legal and not difficult, then Amos is not historical.
If someone is not historical and not attentive, then he is both difficult and misty, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not legal, then Marlon is attentive and Amos is difficult.
If there is at least one people who is either happy or not difficult, then Amos is attentive and Bruce is not legal.
If there is someone who is misty, then Bruce is not historical. | Bruce is not legal. | entailment |
Sandy is happy.
Clifford is not attentive.
Marlon is not difficult.
Marlon is historical.
Dave is not difficult.
Dave is misty.
Hunter is not legal.
Amos is historical.
Bruce is not attentive.
Bruce is difficult.
Amos is legal.
Amos is happy.Someone being difficult is equivalent to being not misty.
Someone who is historical is always misty.
If Clifford is not legal, then Bruce is historical and Clifford is not attentive, and vice versa.
If someone is not attentive and misty, then he is both not difficult and not happy, and vice versa.
Hunter being legal is equivalent to Amos being historical.
If Dave is legal or Sandy is not happy, then Dave is not attentive.
Hunter being difficult or Clifford being attentive implies that Clifford is historical.
If there is someone who is both legal and not difficult, then Amos is not historical.
If someone is not historical and not attentive, then he is both difficult and misty, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not legal, then Marlon is attentive and Amos is difficult.
If there is at least one people who is either happy or not difficult, then Amos is attentive and Bruce is not legal.
If there is someone who is misty, then Bruce is not historical. | Bruce is difficult. | self_contradiction |
Homer is not wet.
Homer is hilarious.
Gideon is not strict.
Michael is light.
Gideon is light.
Michael is hilarious.
Isabel is not hilarious.
Chatwin is wet.
Gideon is not dishonest.
Michael is not strict.
Homer is strict.
Isabel is not wet.Someone who is frightened is always strict.
All light people are dishonest.
If Chatwin is frightened, then Isabel is not light.
If Chatwin is not dishonest, then Isabel is frightened and Michael is not light, and vice versa.
Someone is not frightened and not light if and only if he is dishonest.
If Gideon is strict and Jorge is light, then Jorge is wet.
If there is someone who is hilarious, then Chatwin is strict and Morris is frightened.
Someone is not wet and not strict if and only if he is dishonest.
If Jorge is not hilarious and Jorge is dishonest, then Gideon is not light and Chatwin is not frightened, and vice versa.
If Homer is strict, then Gideon is not wet and Isabel is frightened.
If someone is not wet, then he is hilarious, and vice versa.
Someone being hilarious is equivalent to being not light. | Isabel is frightened. | entailment |
Homer is not wet.
Homer is hilarious.
Gideon is not strict.
Michael is light.
Gideon is light.
Michael is hilarious.
Isabel is not hilarious.
Chatwin is wet.
Gideon is not dishonest.
Michael is not strict.
Homer is strict.
Isabel is not wet.Someone who is frightened is always strict.
All light people are dishonest.
If Chatwin is frightened, then Isabel is not light.
If Chatwin is not dishonest, then Isabel is frightened and Michael is not light, and vice versa.
Someone is not frightened and not light if and only if he is dishonest.
If Gideon is strict and Jorge is light, then Jorge is wet.
If there is someone who is hilarious, then Chatwin is strict and Morris is frightened.
Someone is not wet and not strict if and only if he is dishonest.
If Jorge is not hilarious and Jorge is dishonest, then Gideon is not light and Chatwin is not frightened, and vice versa.
If Homer is strict, then Gideon is not wet and Isabel is frightened.
If someone is not wet, then he is hilarious, and vice versa.
Someone being hilarious is equivalent to being not light. | Isabel is hilarious. | self_contradiction |
Homer is not wet.
Homer is hilarious.
Gideon is not strict.
Michael is light.
Gideon is light.
Michael is hilarious.
Isabel is not hilarious.
Chatwin is wet.
Gideon is not dishonest.
Michael is not strict.
Homer is strict.
Isabel is not wet.Someone who is frightened is always strict.
All light people are dishonest.
If Chatwin is frightened, then Isabel is not light.
If Chatwin is not dishonest, then Isabel is frightened and Michael is not light, and vice versa.
Someone is not frightened and not light if and only if he is dishonest.
If Gideon is strict and Jorge is light, then Jorge is wet.
If there is someone who is hilarious, then Chatwin is strict and Morris is frightened.
Someone is not wet and not strict if and only if he is dishonest.
If Jorge is not hilarious and Jorge is dishonest, then Gideon is not light and Chatwin is not frightened, and vice versa.
If Homer is strict, then Gideon is not wet and Isabel is frightened.
If someone is not wet, then he is hilarious, and vice versa.
Someone being hilarious is equivalent to being not light. | Jorge is dishonest. | neutral |
Homer is not wet.
Homer is hilarious.
Gideon is not strict.
Michael is light.
Gideon is light.
Michael is hilarious.
Isabel is not hilarious.
Chatwin is wet.
Gideon is not dishonest.
Michael is not strict.
Homer is strict.
Isabel is not wet.Someone who is frightened is always strict.
All light people are dishonest.
If Chatwin is frightened, then Isabel is not light.
If Chatwin is not dishonest, then Isabel is frightened and Michael is not light, and vice versa.
Someone is not frightened and not light if and only if he is dishonest.
If Gideon is strict and Jorge is light, then Jorge is wet.
If there is someone who is hilarious, then Chatwin is strict and Morris is frightened.
Someone is not wet and not strict if and only if he is dishonest.
If Jorge is not hilarious and Jorge is dishonest, then Gideon is not light and Chatwin is not frightened, and vice versa.
If Homer is strict, then Gideon is not wet and Isabel is frightened.
If someone is not wet, then he is hilarious, and vice versa.
Someone being hilarious is equivalent to being not light. | Jorge is not hilarious. | neutral |
Homer is not wet.
Homer is hilarious.
Gideon is not strict.
Michael is light.
Gideon is light.
Michael is hilarious.
Isabel is not hilarious.
Chatwin is wet.
Gideon is not dishonest.
Michael is not strict.
Homer is strict.
Isabel is not wet.Someone who is frightened is always strict.
All light people are dishonest.
If Chatwin is frightened, then Isabel is not light.
If Chatwin is not dishonest, then Isabel is frightened and Michael is not light, and vice versa.
Someone is not frightened and not light if and only if he is dishonest.
If Gideon is strict and Jorge is light, then Jorge is wet.
If there is someone who is hilarious, then Chatwin is strict and Morris is frightened.
Someone is not wet and not strict if and only if he is dishonest.
If Jorge is not hilarious and Jorge is dishonest, then Gideon is not light and Chatwin is not frightened, and vice versa.
If Homer is strict, then Gideon is not wet and Isabel is frightened.
If someone is not wet, then he is hilarious, and vice versa.
Someone being hilarious is equivalent to being not light. | Homer is not wet. | entailment |
Homer is not wet.
Homer is hilarious.
Gideon is not strict.
Michael is light.
Gideon is light.
Michael is hilarious.
Isabel is not hilarious.
Chatwin is wet.
Gideon is not dishonest.
Michael is not strict.
Homer is strict.
Isabel is not wet.Someone who is frightened is always strict.
All light people are dishonest.
If Chatwin is frightened, then Isabel is not light.
If Chatwin is not dishonest, then Isabel is frightened and Michael is not light, and vice versa.
Someone is not frightened and not light if and only if he is dishonest.
If Gideon is strict and Jorge is light, then Jorge is wet.
If there is someone who is hilarious, then Chatwin is strict and Morris is frightened.
Someone is not wet and not strict if and only if he is dishonest.
If Jorge is not hilarious and Jorge is dishonest, then Gideon is not light and Chatwin is not frightened, and vice versa.
If Homer is strict, then Gideon is not wet and Isabel is frightened.
If someone is not wet, then he is hilarious, and vice versa.
Someone being hilarious is equivalent to being not light. | Isabel is not light. | entailment |
Homer is not wet.
Homer is hilarious.
Gideon is not strict.
Michael is light.
Gideon is light.
Michael is hilarious.
Isabel is not hilarious.
Chatwin is wet.
Gideon is not dishonest.
Michael is not strict.
Homer is strict.
Isabel is not wet.Someone who is frightened is always strict.
All light people are dishonest.
If Chatwin is frightened, then Isabel is not light.
If Chatwin is not dishonest, then Isabel is frightened and Michael is not light, and vice versa.
Someone is not frightened and not light if and only if he is dishonest.
If Gideon is strict and Jorge is light, then Jorge is wet.
If there is someone who is hilarious, then Chatwin is strict and Morris is frightened.
Someone is not wet and not strict if and only if he is dishonest.
If Jorge is not hilarious and Jorge is dishonest, then Gideon is not light and Chatwin is not frightened, and vice versa.
If Homer is strict, then Gideon is not wet and Isabel is frightened.
If someone is not wet, then he is hilarious, and vice versa.
Someone being hilarious is equivalent to being not light. | Michael is not hilarious. | contradiction |
Homer is not wet.
Homer is hilarious.
Gideon is not strict.
Michael is light.
Gideon is light.
Michael is hilarious.
Isabel is not hilarious.
Chatwin is wet.
Gideon is not dishonest.
Michael is not strict.
Homer is strict.
Isabel is not wet.Someone who is frightened is always strict.
All light people are dishonest.
If Chatwin is frightened, then Isabel is not light.
If Chatwin is not dishonest, then Isabel is frightened and Michael is not light, and vice versa.
Someone is not frightened and not light if and only if he is dishonest.
If Gideon is strict and Jorge is light, then Jorge is wet.
If there is someone who is hilarious, then Chatwin is strict and Morris is frightened.
Someone is not wet and not strict if and only if he is dishonest.
If Jorge is not hilarious and Jorge is dishonest, then Gideon is not light and Chatwin is not frightened, and vice versa.
If Homer is strict, then Gideon is not wet and Isabel is frightened.
If someone is not wet, then he is hilarious, and vice versa.
Someone being hilarious is equivalent to being not light. | Morris is not wet. | neutral |
Homer is not wet.
Homer is hilarious.
Gideon is not strict.
Michael is light.
Gideon is light.
Michael is hilarious.
Isabel is not hilarious.
Chatwin is wet.
Gideon is not dishonest.
Michael is not strict.
Homer is strict.
Isabel is not wet.Someone who is frightened is always strict.
All light people are dishonest.
If Chatwin is frightened, then Isabel is not light.
If Chatwin is not dishonest, then Isabel is frightened and Michael is not light, and vice versa.
Someone is not frightened and not light if and only if he is dishonest.
If Gideon is strict and Jorge is light, then Jorge is wet.
If there is someone who is hilarious, then Chatwin is strict and Morris is frightened.
Someone is not wet and not strict if and only if he is dishonest.
If Jorge is not hilarious and Jorge is dishonest, then Gideon is not light and Chatwin is not frightened, and vice versa.
If Homer is strict, then Gideon is not wet and Isabel is frightened.
If someone is not wet, then he is hilarious, and vice versa.
Someone being hilarious is equivalent to being not light. | Isabel is not frightened. | contradiction |
Homer is not wet.
Homer is hilarious.
Gideon is not strict.
Michael is light.
Gideon is light.
Michael is hilarious.
Isabel is not hilarious.
Chatwin is wet.
Gideon is not dishonest.
Michael is not strict.
Homer is strict.
Isabel is not wet.Someone who is frightened is always strict.
All light people are dishonest.
If Chatwin is frightened, then Isabel is not light.
If Chatwin is not dishonest, then Isabel is frightened and Michael is not light, and vice versa.
Someone is not frightened and not light if and only if he is dishonest.
If Gideon is strict and Jorge is light, then Jorge is wet.
If there is someone who is hilarious, then Chatwin is strict and Morris is frightened.
Someone is not wet and not strict if and only if he is dishonest.
If Jorge is not hilarious and Jorge is dishonest, then Gideon is not light and Chatwin is not frightened, and vice versa.
If Homer is strict, then Gideon is not wet and Isabel is frightened.
If someone is not wet, then he is hilarious, and vice versa.
Someone being hilarious is equivalent to being not light. | Chatwin is light. | neutral |
Homer is not wet.
Homer is hilarious.
Gideon is not strict.
Michael is light.
Gideon is light.
Michael is hilarious.
Isabel is not hilarious.
Chatwin is wet.
Gideon is not dishonest.
Michael is not strict.
Homer is strict.
Isabel is not wet.Someone who is frightened is always strict.
All light people are dishonest.
If Chatwin is frightened, then Isabel is not light.
If Chatwin is not dishonest, then Isabel is frightened and Michael is not light, and vice versa.
Someone is not frightened and not light if and only if he is dishonest.
If Gideon is strict and Jorge is light, then Jorge is wet.
If there is someone who is hilarious, then Chatwin is strict and Morris is frightened.
Someone is not wet and not strict if and only if he is dishonest.
If Jorge is not hilarious and Jorge is dishonest, then Gideon is not light and Chatwin is not frightened, and vice versa.
If Homer is strict, then Gideon is not wet and Isabel is frightened.
If someone is not wet, then he is hilarious, and vice versa.
Someone being hilarious is equivalent to being not light. | Gideon is frightened. | contradiction |
Homer is not wet.
Homer is hilarious.
Gideon is not strict.
Michael is light.
Gideon is light.
Michael is hilarious.
Isabel is not hilarious.
Chatwin is wet.
Gideon is not dishonest.
Michael is not strict.
Homer is strict.
Isabel is not wet.Someone who is frightened is always strict.
All light people are dishonest.
If Chatwin is frightened, then Isabel is not light.
If Chatwin is not dishonest, then Isabel is frightened and Michael is not light, and vice versa.
Someone is not frightened and not light if and only if he is dishonest.
If Gideon is strict and Jorge is light, then Jorge is wet.
If there is someone who is hilarious, then Chatwin is strict and Morris is frightened.
Someone is not wet and not strict if and only if he is dishonest.
If Jorge is not hilarious and Jorge is dishonest, then Gideon is not light and Chatwin is not frightened, and vice versa.
If Homer is strict, then Gideon is not wet and Isabel is frightened.
If someone is not wet, then he is hilarious, and vice versa.
Someone being hilarious is equivalent to being not light. | Gideon is wet. | contradiction |
Homer is not wet.
Homer is hilarious.
Gideon is not strict.
Michael is light.
Gideon is light.
Michael is hilarious.
Isabel is not hilarious.
Chatwin is wet.
Gideon is not dishonest.
Michael is not strict.
Homer is strict.
Isabel is not wet.Someone who is frightened is always strict.
All light people are dishonest.
If Chatwin is frightened, then Isabel is not light.
If Chatwin is not dishonest, then Isabel is frightened and Michael is not light, and vice versa.
Someone is not frightened and not light if and only if he is dishonest.
If Gideon is strict and Jorge is light, then Jorge is wet.
If there is someone who is hilarious, then Chatwin is strict and Morris is frightened.
Someone is not wet and not strict if and only if he is dishonest.
If Jorge is not hilarious and Jorge is dishonest, then Gideon is not light and Chatwin is not frightened, and vice versa.
If Homer is strict, then Gideon is not wet and Isabel is frightened.
If someone is not wet, then he is hilarious, and vice versa.
Someone being hilarious is equivalent to being not light. | Isabel is strict. | entailment |
Homer is not wet.
Homer is hilarious.
Gideon is not strict.
Michael is light.
Gideon is light.
Michael is hilarious.
Isabel is not hilarious.
Chatwin is wet.
Gideon is not dishonest.
Michael is not strict.
Homer is strict.
Isabel is not wet.Someone who is frightened is always strict.
All light people are dishonest.
If Chatwin is frightened, then Isabel is not light.
If Chatwin is not dishonest, then Isabel is frightened and Michael is not light, and vice versa.
Someone is not frightened and not light if and only if he is dishonest.
If Gideon is strict and Jorge is light, then Jorge is wet.
If there is someone who is hilarious, then Chatwin is strict and Morris is frightened.
Someone is not wet and not strict if and only if he is dishonest.
If Jorge is not hilarious and Jorge is dishonest, then Gideon is not light and Chatwin is not frightened, and vice versa.
If Homer is strict, then Gideon is not wet and Isabel is frightened.
If someone is not wet, then he is hilarious, and vice versa.
Someone being hilarious is equivalent to being not light. | Michael is light. | self_contradiction |
Homer is not wet.
Homer is hilarious.
Gideon is not strict.
Michael is light.
Gideon is light.
Michael is hilarious.
Isabel is not hilarious.
Chatwin is wet.
Gideon is not dishonest.
Michael is not strict.
Homer is strict.
Isabel is not wet.Someone who is frightened is always strict.
All light people are dishonest.
If Chatwin is frightened, then Isabel is not light.
If Chatwin is not dishonest, then Isabel is frightened and Michael is not light, and vice versa.
Someone is not frightened and not light if and only if he is dishonest.
If Gideon is strict and Jorge is light, then Jorge is wet.
If there is someone who is hilarious, then Chatwin is strict and Morris is frightened.
Someone is not wet and not strict if and only if he is dishonest.
If Jorge is not hilarious and Jorge is dishonest, then Gideon is not light and Chatwin is not frightened, and vice versa.
If Homer is strict, then Gideon is not wet and Isabel is frightened.
If someone is not wet, then he is hilarious, and vice versa.
Someone being hilarious is equivalent to being not light. | Homer is light. | contradiction |
Homer is not wet.
Homer is hilarious.
Gideon is not strict.
Michael is light.
Gideon is light.
Michael is hilarious.
Isabel is not hilarious.
Chatwin is wet.
Gideon is not dishonest.
Michael is not strict.
Homer is strict.
Isabel is not wet.Someone who is frightened is always strict.
All light people are dishonest.
If Chatwin is frightened, then Isabel is not light.
If Chatwin is not dishonest, then Isabel is frightened and Michael is not light, and vice versa.
Someone is not frightened and not light if and only if he is dishonest.
If Gideon is strict and Jorge is light, then Jorge is wet.
If there is someone who is hilarious, then Chatwin is strict and Morris is frightened.
Someone is not wet and not strict if and only if he is dishonest.
If Jorge is not hilarious and Jorge is dishonest, then Gideon is not light and Chatwin is not frightened, and vice versa.
If Homer is strict, then Gideon is not wet and Isabel is frightened.
If someone is not wet, then he is hilarious, and vice versa.
Someone being hilarious is equivalent to being not light. | Gideon is dishonest. | self_contradiction |
Homer is not wet.
Homer is hilarious.
Gideon is not strict.
Michael is light.
Gideon is light.
Michael is hilarious.
Isabel is not hilarious.
Chatwin is wet.
Gideon is not dishonest.
Michael is not strict.
Homer is strict.
Isabel is not wet.Someone who is frightened is always strict.
All light people are dishonest.
If Chatwin is frightened, then Isabel is not light.
If Chatwin is not dishonest, then Isabel is frightened and Michael is not light, and vice versa.
Someone is not frightened and not light if and only if he is dishonest.
If Gideon is strict and Jorge is light, then Jorge is wet.
If there is someone who is hilarious, then Chatwin is strict and Morris is frightened.
Someone is not wet and not strict if and only if he is dishonest.
If Jorge is not hilarious and Jorge is dishonest, then Gideon is not light and Chatwin is not frightened, and vice versa.
If Homer is strict, then Gideon is not wet and Isabel is frightened.
If someone is not wet, then he is hilarious, and vice versa.
Someone being hilarious is equivalent to being not light. | Homer is not dishonest. | neutral |
Homer is not wet.
Homer is hilarious.
Gideon is not strict.
Michael is light.
Gideon is light.
Michael is hilarious.
Isabel is not hilarious.
Chatwin is wet.
Gideon is not dishonest.
Michael is not strict.
Homer is strict.
Isabel is not wet.Someone who is frightened is always strict.
All light people are dishonest.
If Chatwin is frightened, then Isabel is not light.
If Chatwin is not dishonest, then Isabel is frightened and Michael is not light, and vice versa.
Someone is not frightened and not light if and only if he is dishonest.
If Gideon is strict and Jorge is light, then Jorge is wet.
If there is someone who is hilarious, then Chatwin is strict and Morris is frightened.
Someone is not wet and not strict if and only if he is dishonest.
If Jorge is not hilarious and Jorge is dishonest, then Gideon is not light and Chatwin is not frightened, and vice versa.
If Homer is strict, then Gideon is not wet and Isabel is frightened.
If someone is not wet, then he is hilarious, and vice versa.
Someone being hilarious is equivalent to being not light. | Gideon is light. | self_contradiction |
Homer is not wet.
Homer is hilarious.
Gideon is not strict.
Michael is light.
Gideon is light.
Michael is hilarious.
Isabel is not hilarious.
Chatwin is wet.
Gideon is not dishonest.
Michael is not strict.
Homer is strict.
Isabel is not wet.Someone who is frightened is always strict.
All light people are dishonest.
If Chatwin is frightened, then Isabel is not light.
If Chatwin is not dishonest, then Isabel is frightened and Michael is not light, and vice versa.
Someone is not frightened and not light if and only if he is dishonest.
If Gideon is strict and Jorge is light, then Jorge is wet.
If there is someone who is hilarious, then Chatwin is strict and Morris is frightened.
Someone is not wet and not strict if and only if he is dishonest.
If Jorge is not hilarious and Jorge is dishonest, then Gideon is not light and Chatwin is not frightened, and vice versa.
If Homer is strict, then Gideon is not wet and Isabel is frightened.
If someone is not wet, then he is hilarious, and vice versa.
Someone being hilarious is equivalent to being not light. | Gideon is not dishonest. | self_contradiction |
Homer is not wet.
Homer is hilarious.
Gideon is not strict.
Michael is light.
Gideon is light.
Michael is hilarious.
Isabel is not hilarious.
Chatwin is wet.
Gideon is not dishonest.
Michael is not strict.
Homer is strict.
Isabel is not wet.Someone who is frightened is always strict.
All light people are dishonest.
If Chatwin is frightened, then Isabel is not light.
If Chatwin is not dishonest, then Isabel is frightened and Michael is not light, and vice versa.
Someone is not frightened and not light if and only if he is dishonest.
If Gideon is strict and Jorge is light, then Jorge is wet.
If there is someone who is hilarious, then Chatwin is strict and Morris is frightened.
Someone is not wet and not strict if and only if he is dishonest.
If Jorge is not hilarious and Jorge is dishonest, then Gideon is not light and Chatwin is not frightened, and vice versa.
If Homer is strict, then Gideon is not wet and Isabel is frightened.
If someone is not wet, then he is hilarious, and vice versa.
Someone being hilarious is equivalent to being not light. | Morris is frightened. | entailment |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.