premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Claude is dynamic.
Richard is disobedient.
Richard is generous.
Kendrick is not dynamic.
Kendrick is generous.
Sabrina is not generous.
Claude is clear.
Claude is not generous.
Bryant is excited.
Claude is not worried.
Kendrick is not worried.
Kendrick is excited.If someone is dynamic, then he is both not disobedient and generous.
Someone being both worried and not disobedient is equivalent to being generous and excited.
If there is at least one people who is not worried, then Samson is not generous.
Someone who is eithor not excited or disobedient is always clear.
If there is nobody who is not not generous, then Kendrick is disobedient and Bethany is not clear.
If there is at least one people who is both not generous and not clear, then Kendrick is worried.
It can be concluded that Bethany is clear once knowing that Claude is generous and Samson is excited.
If there is someone who is either not disobedient or clear, then Sabrina is not excited.
If Samson is not excited, then Kendrick is not disobedient, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not dynamic or not clear, then Kendrick is not generous.
Someone who is not dynamic is always both not clear and worried.
If there is at least one people who is not disobedient, then Bethany is not excited and Richard is not worried. | Sabrina is clear. | entailment |
Claude is dynamic.
Richard is disobedient.
Richard is generous.
Kendrick is not dynamic.
Kendrick is generous.
Sabrina is not generous.
Claude is clear.
Claude is not generous.
Bryant is excited.
Claude is not worried.
Kendrick is not worried.
Kendrick is excited.If someone is dynamic, then he is both not disobedient and generous.
Someone being both worried and not disobedient is equivalent to being generous and excited.
If there is at least one people who is not worried, then Samson is not generous.
Someone who is eithor not excited or disobedient is always clear.
If there is nobody who is not not generous, then Kendrick is disobedient and Bethany is not clear.
If there is at least one people who is both not generous and not clear, then Kendrick is worried.
It can be concluded that Bethany is clear once knowing that Claude is generous and Samson is excited.
If there is someone who is either not disobedient or clear, then Sabrina is not excited.
If Samson is not excited, then Kendrick is not disobedient, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not dynamic or not clear, then Kendrick is not generous.
Someone who is not dynamic is always both not clear and worried.
If there is at least one people who is not disobedient, then Bethany is not excited and Richard is not worried. | Bryant is dynamic. | neutral |
Claude is dynamic.
Richard is disobedient.
Richard is generous.
Kendrick is not dynamic.
Kendrick is generous.
Sabrina is not generous.
Claude is clear.
Claude is not generous.
Bryant is excited.
Claude is not worried.
Kendrick is not worried.
Kendrick is excited.If someone is dynamic, then he is both not disobedient and generous.
Someone being both worried and not disobedient is equivalent to being generous and excited.
If there is at least one people who is not worried, then Samson is not generous.
Someone who is eithor not excited or disobedient is always clear.
If there is nobody who is not not generous, then Kendrick is disobedient and Bethany is not clear.
If there is at least one people who is both not generous and not clear, then Kendrick is worried.
It can be concluded that Bethany is clear once knowing that Claude is generous and Samson is excited.
If there is someone who is either not disobedient or clear, then Sabrina is not excited.
If Samson is not excited, then Kendrick is not disobedient, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not dynamic or not clear, then Kendrick is not generous.
Someone who is not dynamic is always both not clear and worried.
If there is at least one people who is not disobedient, then Bethany is not excited and Richard is not worried. | Bethany is not excited. | entailment |
Claude is dynamic.
Richard is disobedient.
Richard is generous.
Kendrick is not dynamic.
Kendrick is generous.
Sabrina is not generous.
Claude is clear.
Claude is not generous.
Bryant is excited.
Claude is not worried.
Kendrick is not worried.
Kendrick is excited.If someone is dynamic, then he is both not disobedient and generous.
Someone being both worried and not disobedient is equivalent to being generous and excited.
If there is at least one people who is not worried, then Samson is not generous.
Someone who is eithor not excited or disobedient is always clear.
If there is nobody who is not not generous, then Kendrick is disobedient and Bethany is not clear.
If there is at least one people who is both not generous and not clear, then Kendrick is worried.
It can be concluded that Bethany is clear once knowing that Claude is generous and Samson is excited.
If there is someone who is either not disobedient or clear, then Sabrina is not excited.
If Samson is not excited, then Kendrick is not disobedient, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not dynamic or not clear, then Kendrick is not generous.
Someone who is not dynamic is always both not clear and worried.
If there is at least one people who is not disobedient, then Bethany is not excited and Richard is not worried. | Samson is generous. | contradiction |
Claude is dynamic.
Richard is disobedient.
Richard is generous.
Kendrick is not dynamic.
Kendrick is generous.
Sabrina is not generous.
Claude is clear.
Claude is not generous.
Bryant is excited.
Claude is not worried.
Kendrick is not worried.
Kendrick is excited.If someone is dynamic, then he is both not disobedient and generous.
Someone being both worried and not disobedient is equivalent to being generous and excited.
If there is at least one people who is not worried, then Samson is not generous.
Someone who is eithor not excited or disobedient is always clear.
If there is nobody who is not not generous, then Kendrick is disobedient and Bethany is not clear.
If there is at least one people who is both not generous and not clear, then Kendrick is worried.
It can be concluded that Bethany is clear once knowing that Claude is generous and Samson is excited.
If there is someone who is either not disobedient or clear, then Sabrina is not excited.
If Samson is not excited, then Kendrick is not disobedient, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not dynamic or not clear, then Kendrick is not generous.
Someone who is not dynamic is always both not clear and worried.
If there is at least one people who is not disobedient, then Bethany is not excited and Richard is not worried. | Claude is generous. | self_contradiction |
Claude is dynamic.
Richard is disobedient.
Richard is generous.
Kendrick is not dynamic.
Kendrick is generous.
Sabrina is not generous.
Claude is clear.
Claude is not generous.
Bryant is excited.
Claude is not worried.
Kendrick is not worried.
Kendrick is excited.If someone is dynamic, then he is both not disobedient and generous.
Someone being both worried and not disobedient is equivalent to being generous and excited.
If there is at least one people who is not worried, then Samson is not generous.
Someone who is eithor not excited or disobedient is always clear.
If there is nobody who is not not generous, then Kendrick is disobedient and Bethany is not clear.
If there is at least one people who is both not generous and not clear, then Kendrick is worried.
It can be concluded that Bethany is clear once knowing that Claude is generous and Samson is excited.
If there is someone who is either not disobedient or clear, then Sabrina is not excited.
If Samson is not excited, then Kendrick is not disobedient, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not dynamic or not clear, then Kendrick is not generous.
Someone who is not dynamic is always both not clear and worried.
If there is at least one people who is not disobedient, then Bethany is not excited and Richard is not worried. | Kendrick is not worried. | self_contradiction |
Claude is dynamic.
Richard is disobedient.
Richard is generous.
Kendrick is not dynamic.
Kendrick is generous.
Sabrina is not generous.
Claude is clear.
Claude is not generous.
Bryant is excited.
Claude is not worried.
Kendrick is not worried.
Kendrick is excited.If someone is dynamic, then he is both not disobedient and generous.
Someone being both worried and not disobedient is equivalent to being generous and excited.
If there is at least one people who is not worried, then Samson is not generous.
Someone who is eithor not excited or disobedient is always clear.
If there is nobody who is not not generous, then Kendrick is disobedient and Bethany is not clear.
If there is at least one people who is both not generous and not clear, then Kendrick is worried.
It can be concluded that Bethany is clear once knowing that Claude is generous and Samson is excited.
If there is someone who is either not disobedient or clear, then Sabrina is not excited.
If Samson is not excited, then Kendrick is not disobedient, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not dynamic or not clear, then Kendrick is not generous.
Someone who is not dynamic is always both not clear and worried.
If there is at least one people who is not disobedient, then Bethany is not excited and Richard is not worried. | Richard is not dynamic. | neutral |
Claude is dynamic.
Richard is disobedient.
Richard is generous.
Kendrick is not dynamic.
Kendrick is generous.
Sabrina is not generous.
Claude is clear.
Claude is not generous.
Bryant is excited.
Claude is not worried.
Kendrick is not worried.
Kendrick is excited.If someone is dynamic, then he is both not disobedient and generous.
Someone being both worried and not disobedient is equivalent to being generous and excited.
If there is at least one people who is not worried, then Samson is not generous.
Someone who is eithor not excited or disobedient is always clear.
If there is nobody who is not not generous, then Kendrick is disobedient and Bethany is not clear.
If there is at least one people who is both not generous and not clear, then Kendrick is worried.
It can be concluded that Bethany is clear once knowing that Claude is generous and Samson is excited.
If there is someone who is either not disobedient or clear, then Sabrina is not excited.
If Samson is not excited, then Kendrick is not disobedient, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not dynamic or not clear, then Kendrick is not generous.
Someone who is not dynamic is always both not clear and worried.
If there is at least one people who is not disobedient, then Bethany is not excited and Richard is not worried. | Claude is excited. | neutral |
Claude is dynamic.
Richard is disobedient.
Richard is generous.
Kendrick is not dynamic.
Kendrick is generous.
Sabrina is not generous.
Claude is clear.
Claude is not generous.
Bryant is excited.
Claude is not worried.
Kendrick is not worried.
Kendrick is excited.If someone is dynamic, then he is both not disobedient and generous.
Someone being both worried and not disobedient is equivalent to being generous and excited.
If there is at least one people who is not worried, then Samson is not generous.
Someone who is eithor not excited or disobedient is always clear.
If there is nobody who is not not generous, then Kendrick is disobedient and Bethany is not clear.
If there is at least one people who is both not generous and not clear, then Kendrick is worried.
It can be concluded that Bethany is clear once knowing that Claude is generous and Samson is excited.
If there is someone who is either not disobedient or clear, then Sabrina is not excited.
If Samson is not excited, then Kendrick is not disobedient, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not dynamic or not clear, then Kendrick is not generous.
Someone who is not dynamic is always both not clear and worried.
If there is at least one people who is not disobedient, then Bethany is not excited and Richard is not worried. | Kendrick is worried. | self_contradiction |
Claude is dynamic.
Richard is disobedient.
Richard is generous.
Kendrick is not dynamic.
Kendrick is generous.
Sabrina is not generous.
Claude is clear.
Claude is not generous.
Bryant is excited.
Claude is not worried.
Kendrick is not worried.
Kendrick is excited.If someone is dynamic, then he is both not disobedient and generous.
Someone being both worried and not disobedient is equivalent to being generous and excited.
If there is at least one people who is not worried, then Samson is not generous.
Someone who is eithor not excited or disobedient is always clear.
If there is nobody who is not not generous, then Kendrick is disobedient and Bethany is not clear.
If there is at least one people who is both not generous and not clear, then Kendrick is worried.
It can be concluded that Bethany is clear once knowing that Claude is generous and Samson is excited.
If there is someone who is either not disobedient or clear, then Sabrina is not excited.
If Samson is not excited, then Kendrick is not disobedient, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not dynamic or not clear, then Kendrick is not generous.
Someone who is not dynamic is always both not clear and worried.
If there is at least one people who is not disobedient, then Bethany is not excited and Richard is not worried. | Richard is not clear. | contradiction |
Claude is dynamic.
Richard is disobedient.
Richard is generous.
Kendrick is not dynamic.
Kendrick is generous.
Sabrina is not generous.
Claude is clear.
Claude is not generous.
Bryant is excited.
Claude is not worried.
Kendrick is not worried.
Kendrick is excited.If someone is dynamic, then he is both not disobedient and generous.
Someone being both worried and not disobedient is equivalent to being generous and excited.
If there is at least one people who is not worried, then Samson is not generous.
Someone who is eithor not excited or disobedient is always clear.
If there is nobody who is not not generous, then Kendrick is disobedient and Bethany is not clear.
If there is at least one people who is both not generous and not clear, then Kendrick is worried.
It can be concluded that Bethany is clear once knowing that Claude is generous and Samson is excited.
If there is someone who is either not disobedient or clear, then Sabrina is not excited.
If Samson is not excited, then Kendrick is not disobedient, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not dynamic or not clear, then Kendrick is not generous.
Someone who is not dynamic is always both not clear and worried.
If there is at least one people who is not disobedient, then Bethany is not excited and Richard is not worried. | Samson is not worried. | neutral |
Claude is dynamic.
Richard is disobedient.
Richard is generous.
Kendrick is not dynamic.
Kendrick is generous.
Sabrina is not generous.
Claude is clear.
Claude is not generous.
Bryant is excited.
Claude is not worried.
Kendrick is not worried.
Kendrick is excited.If someone is dynamic, then he is both not disobedient and generous.
Someone being both worried and not disobedient is equivalent to being generous and excited.
If there is at least one people who is not worried, then Samson is not generous.
Someone who is eithor not excited or disobedient is always clear.
If there is nobody who is not not generous, then Kendrick is disobedient and Bethany is not clear.
If there is at least one people who is both not generous and not clear, then Kendrick is worried.
It can be concluded that Bethany is clear once knowing that Claude is generous and Samson is excited.
If there is someone who is either not disobedient or clear, then Sabrina is not excited.
If Samson is not excited, then Kendrick is not disobedient, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not dynamic or not clear, then Kendrick is not generous.
Someone who is not dynamic is always both not clear and worried.
If there is at least one people who is not disobedient, then Bethany is not excited and Richard is not worried. | Samson is not generous. | entailment |
Claude is dynamic.
Richard is disobedient.
Richard is generous.
Kendrick is not dynamic.
Kendrick is generous.
Sabrina is not generous.
Claude is clear.
Claude is not generous.
Bryant is excited.
Claude is not worried.
Kendrick is not worried.
Kendrick is excited.If someone is dynamic, then he is both not disobedient and generous.
Someone being both worried and not disobedient is equivalent to being generous and excited.
If there is at least one people who is not worried, then Samson is not generous.
Someone who is eithor not excited or disobedient is always clear.
If there is nobody who is not not generous, then Kendrick is disobedient and Bethany is not clear.
If there is at least one people who is both not generous and not clear, then Kendrick is worried.
It can be concluded that Bethany is clear once knowing that Claude is generous and Samson is excited.
If there is someone who is either not disobedient or clear, then Sabrina is not excited.
If Samson is not excited, then Kendrick is not disobedient, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not dynamic or not clear, then Kendrick is not generous.
Someone who is not dynamic is always both not clear and worried.
If there is at least one people who is not disobedient, then Bethany is not excited and Richard is not worried. | Bethany is not dynamic. | neutral |
Claude is dynamic.
Richard is disobedient.
Richard is generous.
Kendrick is not dynamic.
Kendrick is generous.
Sabrina is not generous.
Claude is clear.
Claude is not generous.
Bryant is excited.
Claude is not worried.
Kendrick is not worried.
Kendrick is excited.If someone is dynamic, then he is both not disobedient and generous.
Someone being both worried and not disobedient is equivalent to being generous and excited.
If there is at least one people who is not worried, then Samson is not generous.
Someone who is eithor not excited or disobedient is always clear.
If there is nobody who is not not generous, then Kendrick is disobedient and Bethany is not clear.
If there is at least one people who is both not generous and not clear, then Kendrick is worried.
It can be concluded that Bethany is clear once knowing that Claude is generous and Samson is excited.
If there is someone who is either not disobedient or clear, then Sabrina is not excited.
If Samson is not excited, then Kendrick is not disobedient, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not dynamic or not clear, then Kendrick is not generous.
Someone who is not dynamic is always both not clear and worried.
If there is at least one people who is not disobedient, then Bethany is not excited and Richard is not worried. | Kendrick is not clear. | entailment |
Claude is dynamic.
Richard is disobedient.
Richard is generous.
Kendrick is not dynamic.
Kendrick is generous.
Sabrina is not generous.
Claude is clear.
Claude is not generous.
Bryant is excited.
Claude is not worried.
Kendrick is not worried.
Kendrick is excited.If someone is dynamic, then he is both not disobedient and generous.
Someone being both worried and not disobedient is equivalent to being generous and excited.
If there is at least one people who is not worried, then Samson is not generous.
Someone who is eithor not excited or disobedient is always clear.
If there is nobody who is not not generous, then Kendrick is disobedient and Bethany is not clear.
If there is at least one people who is both not generous and not clear, then Kendrick is worried.
It can be concluded that Bethany is clear once knowing that Claude is generous and Samson is excited.
If there is someone who is either not disobedient or clear, then Sabrina is not excited.
If Samson is not excited, then Kendrick is not disobedient, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not dynamic or not clear, then Kendrick is not generous.
Someone who is not dynamic is always both not clear and worried.
If there is at least one people who is not disobedient, then Bethany is not excited and Richard is not worried. | Sabrina is excited. | contradiction |
Claude is dynamic.
Richard is disobedient.
Richard is generous.
Kendrick is not dynamic.
Kendrick is generous.
Sabrina is not generous.
Claude is clear.
Claude is not generous.
Bryant is excited.
Claude is not worried.
Kendrick is not worried.
Kendrick is excited.If someone is dynamic, then he is both not disobedient and generous.
Someone being both worried and not disobedient is equivalent to being generous and excited.
If there is at least one people who is not worried, then Samson is not generous.
Someone who is eithor not excited or disobedient is always clear.
If there is nobody who is not not generous, then Kendrick is disobedient and Bethany is not clear.
If there is at least one people who is both not generous and not clear, then Kendrick is worried.
It can be concluded that Bethany is clear once knowing that Claude is generous and Samson is excited.
If there is someone who is either not disobedient or clear, then Sabrina is not excited.
If Samson is not excited, then Kendrick is not disobedient, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not dynamic or not clear, then Kendrick is not generous.
Someone who is not dynamic is always both not clear and worried.
If there is at least one people who is not disobedient, then Bethany is not excited and Richard is not worried. | Claude is not generous. | self_contradiction |
Claude is dynamic.
Richard is disobedient.
Richard is generous.
Kendrick is not dynamic.
Kendrick is generous.
Sabrina is not generous.
Claude is clear.
Claude is not generous.
Bryant is excited.
Claude is not worried.
Kendrick is not worried.
Kendrick is excited.If someone is dynamic, then he is both not disobedient and generous.
Someone being both worried and not disobedient is equivalent to being generous and excited.
If there is at least one people who is not worried, then Samson is not generous.
Someone who is eithor not excited or disobedient is always clear.
If there is nobody who is not not generous, then Kendrick is disobedient and Bethany is not clear.
If there is at least one people who is both not generous and not clear, then Kendrick is worried.
It can be concluded that Bethany is clear once knowing that Claude is generous and Samson is excited.
If there is someone who is either not disobedient or clear, then Sabrina is not excited.
If Samson is not excited, then Kendrick is not disobedient, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not dynamic or not clear, then Kendrick is not generous.
Someone who is not dynamic is always both not clear and worried.
If there is at least one people who is not disobedient, then Bethany is not excited and Richard is not worried. | Richard is clear. | entailment |
Claude is dynamic.
Richard is disobedient.
Richard is generous.
Kendrick is not dynamic.
Kendrick is generous.
Sabrina is not generous.
Claude is clear.
Claude is not generous.
Bryant is excited.
Claude is not worried.
Kendrick is not worried.
Kendrick is excited.If someone is dynamic, then he is both not disobedient and generous.
Someone being both worried and not disobedient is equivalent to being generous and excited.
If there is at least one people who is not worried, then Samson is not generous.
Someone who is eithor not excited or disobedient is always clear.
If there is nobody who is not not generous, then Kendrick is disobedient and Bethany is not clear.
If there is at least one people who is both not generous and not clear, then Kendrick is worried.
It can be concluded that Bethany is clear once knowing that Claude is generous and Samson is excited.
If there is someone who is either not disobedient or clear, then Sabrina is not excited.
If Samson is not excited, then Kendrick is not disobedient, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not dynamic or not clear, then Kendrick is not generous.
Someone who is not dynamic is always both not clear and worried.
If there is at least one people who is not disobedient, then Bethany is not excited and Richard is not worried. | Kendrick is generous. | self_contradiction |
Claude is dynamic.
Richard is disobedient.
Richard is generous.
Kendrick is not dynamic.
Kendrick is generous.
Sabrina is not generous.
Claude is clear.
Claude is not generous.
Bryant is excited.
Claude is not worried.
Kendrick is not worried.
Kendrick is excited.If someone is dynamic, then he is both not disobedient and generous.
Someone being both worried and not disobedient is equivalent to being generous and excited.
If there is at least one people who is not worried, then Samson is not generous.
Someone who is eithor not excited or disobedient is always clear.
If there is nobody who is not not generous, then Kendrick is disobedient and Bethany is not clear.
If there is at least one people who is both not generous and not clear, then Kendrick is worried.
It can be concluded that Bethany is clear once knowing that Claude is generous and Samson is excited.
If there is someone who is either not disobedient or clear, then Sabrina is not excited.
If Samson is not excited, then Kendrick is not disobedient, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not dynamic or not clear, then Kendrick is not generous.
Someone who is not dynamic is always both not clear and worried.
If there is at least one people who is not disobedient, then Bethany is not excited and Richard is not worried. | Claude is not clear. | contradiction |
Claude is dynamic.
Richard is disobedient.
Richard is generous.
Kendrick is not dynamic.
Kendrick is generous.
Sabrina is not generous.
Claude is clear.
Claude is not generous.
Bryant is excited.
Claude is not worried.
Kendrick is not worried.
Kendrick is excited.If someone is dynamic, then he is both not disobedient and generous.
Someone being both worried and not disobedient is equivalent to being generous and excited.
If there is at least one people who is not worried, then Samson is not generous.
Someone who is eithor not excited or disobedient is always clear.
If there is nobody who is not not generous, then Kendrick is disobedient and Bethany is not clear.
If there is at least one people who is both not generous and not clear, then Kendrick is worried.
It can be concluded that Bethany is clear once knowing that Claude is generous and Samson is excited.
If there is someone who is either not disobedient or clear, then Sabrina is not excited.
If Samson is not excited, then Kendrick is not disobedient, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not dynamic or not clear, then Kendrick is not generous.
Someone who is not dynamic is always both not clear and worried.
If there is at least one people who is not disobedient, then Bethany is not excited and Richard is not worried. | Richard is not disobedient. | contradiction |
Quinn is not blue-eyed.
Justin is conscious.
Justin is blue-eyed.
Melody is not whispering.
Luisa is not popular.
Crispin is blue-eyed.
Crispin is whispering.
Quinn is not popular.
Joshua is not tall.
Melody is curious.
Joshua is not blue-eyed.
Melody is conscious.Crispin is not whispering if and only if Crispin is not conscious.
If there is at least one people who is popular, then Justin is not curious.
If Quinn is blue-eyed, then Melody is not curious and Crispin is not tall.
If someone is not curious, then he is whispering.
If someone is blue-eyed or he is not curious, then he is not popular.
Crispin is popular if and only if Melody is not whispering.
If Luisa is not curious, then Justin is conscious and Quinn is blue-eyed, and vice versa.
If Joshua is not tall, then Justin is not popular and Crispin is blue-eyed, and vice versa.
Joshua being not curious or Luisa being not blue-eyed implies that Crispin is not conscious.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Crispin is not blue-eyed and Melody is curious.
It can be concluded that Royce is not conscious once knowing that Melody is curious and Justin is not blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is whispering or blue-eyed, then Luisa is popular. | Justin is not whispering. | contradiction |
Quinn is not blue-eyed.
Justin is conscious.
Justin is blue-eyed.
Melody is not whispering.
Luisa is not popular.
Crispin is blue-eyed.
Crispin is whispering.
Quinn is not popular.
Joshua is not tall.
Melody is curious.
Joshua is not blue-eyed.
Melody is conscious.Crispin is not whispering if and only if Crispin is not conscious.
If there is at least one people who is popular, then Justin is not curious.
If Quinn is blue-eyed, then Melody is not curious and Crispin is not tall.
If someone is not curious, then he is whispering.
If someone is blue-eyed or he is not curious, then he is not popular.
Crispin is popular if and only if Melody is not whispering.
If Luisa is not curious, then Justin is conscious and Quinn is blue-eyed, and vice versa.
If Joshua is not tall, then Justin is not popular and Crispin is blue-eyed, and vice versa.
Joshua being not curious or Luisa being not blue-eyed implies that Crispin is not conscious.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Crispin is not blue-eyed and Melody is curious.
It can be concluded that Royce is not conscious once knowing that Melody is curious and Justin is not blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is whispering or blue-eyed, then Luisa is popular. | Crispin is not blue-eyed. | self_contradiction |
Quinn is not blue-eyed.
Justin is conscious.
Justin is blue-eyed.
Melody is not whispering.
Luisa is not popular.
Crispin is blue-eyed.
Crispin is whispering.
Quinn is not popular.
Joshua is not tall.
Melody is curious.
Joshua is not blue-eyed.
Melody is conscious.Crispin is not whispering if and only if Crispin is not conscious.
If there is at least one people who is popular, then Justin is not curious.
If Quinn is blue-eyed, then Melody is not curious and Crispin is not tall.
If someone is not curious, then he is whispering.
If someone is blue-eyed or he is not curious, then he is not popular.
Crispin is popular if and only if Melody is not whispering.
If Luisa is not curious, then Justin is conscious and Quinn is blue-eyed, and vice versa.
If Joshua is not tall, then Justin is not popular and Crispin is blue-eyed, and vice versa.
Joshua being not curious or Luisa being not blue-eyed implies that Crispin is not conscious.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Crispin is not blue-eyed and Melody is curious.
It can be concluded that Royce is not conscious once knowing that Melody is curious and Justin is not blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is whispering or blue-eyed, then Luisa is popular. | Crispin is blue-eyed. | self_contradiction |
Quinn is not blue-eyed.
Justin is conscious.
Justin is blue-eyed.
Melody is not whispering.
Luisa is not popular.
Crispin is blue-eyed.
Crispin is whispering.
Quinn is not popular.
Joshua is not tall.
Melody is curious.
Joshua is not blue-eyed.
Melody is conscious.Crispin is not whispering if and only if Crispin is not conscious.
If there is at least one people who is popular, then Justin is not curious.
If Quinn is blue-eyed, then Melody is not curious and Crispin is not tall.
If someone is not curious, then he is whispering.
If someone is blue-eyed or he is not curious, then he is not popular.
Crispin is popular if and only if Melody is not whispering.
If Luisa is not curious, then Justin is conscious and Quinn is blue-eyed, and vice versa.
If Joshua is not tall, then Justin is not popular and Crispin is blue-eyed, and vice versa.
Joshua being not curious or Luisa being not blue-eyed implies that Crispin is not conscious.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Crispin is not blue-eyed and Melody is curious.
It can be concluded that Royce is not conscious once knowing that Melody is curious and Justin is not blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is whispering or blue-eyed, then Luisa is popular. | Justin is blue-eyed. | entailment |
Quinn is not blue-eyed.
Justin is conscious.
Justin is blue-eyed.
Melody is not whispering.
Luisa is not popular.
Crispin is blue-eyed.
Crispin is whispering.
Quinn is not popular.
Joshua is not tall.
Melody is curious.
Joshua is not blue-eyed.
Melody is conscious.Crispin is not whispering if and only if Crispin is not conscious.
If there is at least one people who is popular, then Justin is not curious.
If Quinn is blue-eyed, then Melody is not curious and Crispin is not tall.
If someone is not curious, then he is whispering.
If someone is blue-eyed or he is not curious, then he is not popular.
Crispin is popular if and only if Melody is not whispering.
If Luisa is not curious, then Justin is conscious and Quinn is blue-eyed, and vice versa.
If Joshua is not tall, then Justin is not popular and Crispin is blue-eyed, and vice versa.
Joshua being not curious or Luisa being not blue-eyed implies that Crispin is not conscious.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Crispin is not blue-eyed and Melody is curious.
It can be concluded that Royce is not conscious once knowing that Melody is curious and Justin is not blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is whispering or blue-eyed, then Luisa is popular. | Justin is not conscious. | contradiction |
Quinn is not blue-eyed.
Justin is conscious.
Justin is blue-eyed.
Melody is not whispering.
Luisa is not popular.
Crispin is blue-eyed.
Crispin is whispering.
Quinn is not popular.
Joshua is not tall.
Melody is curious.
Joshua is not blue-eyed.
Melody is conscious.Crispin is not whispering if and only if Crispin is not conscious.
If there is at least one people who is popular, then Justin is not curious.
If Quinn is blue-eyed, then Melody is not curious and Crispin is not tall.
If someone is not curious, then he is whispering.
If someone is blue-eyed or he is not curious, then he is not popular.
Crispin is popular if and only if Melody is not whispering.
If Luisa is not curious, then Justin is conscious and Quinn is blue-eyed, and vice versa.
If Joshua is not tall, then Justin is not popular and Crispin is blue-eyed, and vice versa.
Joshua being not curious or Luisa being not blue-eyed implies that Crispin is not conscious.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Crispin is not blue-eyed and Melody is curious.
It can be concluded that Royce is not conscious once knowing that Melody is curious and Justin is not blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is whispering or blue-eyed, then Luisa is popular. | Melody is not conscious. | contradiction |
Quinn is not blue-eyed.
Justin is conscious.
Justin is blue-eyed.
Melody is not whispering.
Luisa is not popular.
Crispin is blue-eyed.
Crispin is whispering.
Quinn is not popular.
Joshua is not tall.
Melody is curious.
Joshua is not blue-eyed.
Melody is conscious.Crispin is not whispering if and only if Crispin is not conscious.
If there is at least one people who is popular, then Justin is not curious.
If Quinn is blue-eyed, then Melody is not curious and Crispin is not tall.
If someone is not curious, then he is whispering.
If someone is blue-eyed or he is not curious, then he is not popular.
Crispin is popular if and only if Melody is not whispering.
If Luisa is not curious, then Justin is conscious and Quinn is blue-eyed, and vice versa.
If Joshua is not tall, then Justin is not popular and Crispin is blue-eyed, and vice versa.
Joshua being not curious or Luisa being not blue-eyed implies that Crispin is not conscious.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Crispin is not blue-eyed and Melody is curious.
It can be concluded that Royce is not conscious once knowing that Melody is curious and Justin is not blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is whispering or blue-eyed, then Luisa is popular. | Quinn is popular. | contradiction |
Quinn is not blue-eyed.
Justin is conscious.
Justin is blue-eyed.
Melody is not whispering.
Luisa is not popular.
Crispin is blue-eyed.
Crispin is whispering.
Quinn is not popular.
Joshua is not tall.
Melody is curious.
Joshua is not blue-eyed.
Melody is conscious.Crispin is not whispering if and only if Crispin is not conscious.
If there is at least one people who is popular, then Justin is not curious.
If Quinn is blue-eyed, then Melody is not curious and Crispin is not tall.
If someone is not curious, then he is whispering.
If someone is blue-eyed or he is not curious, then he is not popular.
Crispin is popular if and only if Melody is not whispering.
If Luisa is not curious, then Justin is conscious and Quinn is blue-eyed, and vice versa.
If Joshua is not tall, then Justin is not popular and Crispin is blue-eyed, and vice versa.
Joshua being not curious or Luisa being not blue-eyed implies that Crispin is not conscious.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Crispin is not blue-eyed and Melody is curious.
It can be concluded that Royce is not conscious once knowing that Melody is curious and Justin is not blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is whispering or blue-eyed, then Luisa is popular. | Quinn is tall. | neutral |
Quinn is not blue-eyed.
Justin is conscious.
Justin is blue-eyed.
Melody is not whispering.
Luisa is not popular.
Crispin is blue-eyed.
Crispin is whispering.
Quinn is not popular.
Joshua is not tall.
Melody is curious.
Joshua is not blue-eyed.
Melody is conscious.Crispin is not whispering if and only if Crispin is not conscious.
If there is at least one people who is popular, then Justin is not curious.
If Quinn is blue-eyed, then Melody is not curious and Crispin is not tall.
If someone is not curious, then he is whispering.
If someone is blue-eyed or he is not curious, then he is not popular.
Crispin is popular if and only if Melody is not whispering.
If Luisa is not curious, then Justin is conscious and Quinn is blue-eyed, and vice versa.
If Joshua is not tall, then Justin is not popular and Crispin is blue-eyed, and vice versa.
Joshua being not curious or Luisa being not blue-eyed implies that Crispin is not conscious.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Crispin is not blue-eyed and Melody is curious.
It can be concluded that Royce is not conscious once knowing that Melody is curious and Justin is not blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is whispering or blue-eyed, then Luisa is popular. | Crispin is not curious. | neutral |
Quinn is not blue-eyed.
Justin is conscious.
Justin is blue-eyed.
Melody is not whispering.
Luisa is not popular.
Crispin is blue-eyed.
Crispin is whispering.
Quinn is not popular.
Joshua is not tall.
Melody is curious.
Joshua is not blue-eyed.
Melody is conscious.Crispin is not whispering if and only if Crispin is not conscious.
If there is at least one people who is popular, then Justin is not curious.
If Quinn is blue-eyed, then Melody is not curious and Crispin is not tall.
If someone is not curious, then he is whispering.
If someone is blue-eyed or he is not curious, then he is not popular.
Crispin is popular if and only if Melody is not whispering.
If Luisa is not curious, then Justin is conscious and Quinn is blue-eyed, and vice versa.
If Joshua is not tall, then Justin is not popular and Crispin is blue-eyed, and vice versa.
Joshua being not curious or Luisa being not blue-eyed implies that Crispin is not conscious.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Crispin is not blue-eyed and Melody is curious.
It can be concluded that Royce is not conscious once knowing that Melody is curious and Justin is not blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is whispering or blue-eyed, then Luisa is popular. | Justin is not curious. | entailment |
Quinn is not blue-eyed.
Justin is conscious.
Justin is blue-eyed.
Melody is not whispering.
Luisa is not popular.
Crispin is blue-eyed.
Crispin is whispering.
Quinn is not popular.
Joshua is not tall.
Melody is curious.
Joshua is not blue-eyed.
Melody is conscious.Crispin is not whispering if and only if Crispin is not conscious.
If there is at least one people who is popular, then Justin is not curious.
If Quinn is blue-eyed, then Melody is not curious and Crispin is not tall.
If someone is not curious, then he is whispering.
If someone is blue-eyed or he is not curious, then he is not popular.
Crispin is popular if and only if Melody is not whispering.
If Luisa is not curious, then Justin is conscious and Quinn is blue-eyed, and vice versa.
If Joshua is not tall, then Justin is not popular and Crispin is blue-eyed, and vice versa.
Joshua being not curious or Luisa being not blue-eyed implies that Crispin is not conscious.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Crispin is not blue-eyed and Melody is curious.
It can be concluded that Royce is not conscious once knowing that Melody is curious and Justin is not blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is whispering or blue-eyed, then Luisa is popular. | Joshua is tall. | contradiction |
Quinn is not blue-eyed.
Justin is conscious.
Justin is blue-eyed.
Melody is not whispering.
Luisa is not popular.
Crispin is blue-eyed.
Crispin is whispering.
Quinn is not popular.
Joshua is not tall.
Melody is curious.
Joshua is not blue-eyed.
Melody is conscious.Crispin is not whispering if and only if Crispin is not conscious.
If there is at least one people who is popular, then Justin is not curious.
If Quinn is blue-eyed, then Melody is not curious and Crispin is not tall.
If someone is not curious, then he is whispering.
If someone is blue-eyed or he is not curious, then he is not popular.
Crispin is popular if and only if Melody is not whispering.
If Luisa is not curious, then Justin is conscious and Quinn is blue-eyed, and vice versa.
If Joshua is not tall, then Justin is not popular and Crispin is blue-eyed, and vice versa.
Joshua being not curious or Luisa being not blue-eyed implies that Crispin is not conscious.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Crispin is not blue-eyed and Melody is curious.
It can be concluded that Royce is not conscious once knowing that Melody is curious and Justin is not blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is whispering or blue-eyed, then Luisa is popular. | Quinn is not conscious. | neutral |
Quinn is not blue-eyed.
Justin is conscious.
Justin is blue-eyed.
Melody is not whispering.
Luisa is not popular.
Crispin is blue-eyed.
Crispin is whispering.
Quinn is not popular.
Joshua is not tall.
Melody is curious.
Joshua is not blue-eyed.
Melody is conscious.Crispin is not whispering if and only if Crispin is not conscious.
If there is at least one people who is popular, then Justin is not curious.
If Quinn is blue-eyed, then Melody is not curious and Crispin is not tall.
If someone is not curious, then he is whispering.
If someone is blue-eyed or he is not curious, then he is not popular.
Crispin is popular if and only if Melody is not whispering.
If Luisa is not curious, then Justin is conscious and Quinn is blue-eyed, and vice versa.
If Joshua is not tall, then Justin is not popular and Crispin is blue-eyed, and vice versa.
Joshua being not curious or Luisa being not blue-eyed implies that Crispin is not conscious.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Crispin is not blue-eyed and Melody is curious.
It can be concluded that Royce is not conscious once knowing that Melody is curious and Justin is not blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is whispering or blue-eyed, then Luisa is popular. | Justin is conscious. | entailment |
Quinn is not blue-eyed.
Justin is conscious.
Justin is blue-eyed.
Melody is not whispering.
Luisa is not popular.
Crispin is blue-eyed.
Crispin is whispering.
Quinn is not popular.
Joshua is not tall.
Melody is curious.
Joshua is not blue-eyed.
Melody is conscious.Crispin is not whispering if and only if Crispin is not conscious.
If there is at least one people who is popular, then Justin is not curious.
If Quinn is blue-eyed, then Melody is not curious and Crispin is not tall.
If someone is not curious, then he is whispering.
If someone is blue-eyed or he is not curious, then he is not popular.
Crispin is popular if and only if Melody is not whispering.
If Luisa is not curious, then Justin is conscious and Quinn is blue-eyed, and vice versa.
If Joshua is not tall, then Justin is not popular and Crispin is blue-eyed, and vice versa.
Joshua being not curious or Luisa being not blue-eyed implies that Crispin is not conscious.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Crispin is not blue-eyed and Melody is curious.
It can be concluded that Royce is not conscious once knowing that Melody is curious and Justin is not blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is whispering or blue-eyed, then Luisa is popular. | Joshua is popular. | neutral |
Quinn is not blue-eyed.
Justin is conscious.
Justin is blue-eyed.
Melody is not whispering.
Luisa is not popular.
Crispin is blue-eyed.
Crispin is whispering.
Quinn is not popular.
Joshua is not tall.
Melody is curious.
Joshua is not blue-eyed.
Melody is conscious.Crispin is not whispering if and only if Crispin is not conscious.
If there is at least one people who is popular, then Justin is not curious.
If Quinn is blue-eyed, then Melody is not curious and Crispin is not tall.
If someone is not curious, then he is whispering.
If someone is blue-eyed or he is not curious, then he is not popular.
Crispin is popular if and only if Melody is not whispering.
If Luisa is not curious, then Justin is conscious and Quinn is blue-eyed, and vice versa.
If Joshua is not tall, then Justin is not popular and Crispin is blue-eyed, and vice versa.
Joshua being not curious or Luisa being not blue-eyed implies that Crispin is not conscious.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Crispin is not blue-eyed and Melody is curious.
It can be concluded that Royce is not conscious once knowing that Melody is curious and Justin is not blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is whispering or blue-eyed, then Luisa is popular. | Melody is not whispering. | entailment |
Quinn is not blue-eyed.
Justin is conscious.
Justin is blue-eyed.
Melody is not whispering.
Luisa is not popular.
Crispin is blue-eyed.
Crispin is whispering.
Quinn is not popular.
Joshua is not tall.
Melody is curious.
Joshua is not blue-eyed.
Melody is conscious.Crispin is not whispering if and only if Crispin is not conscious.
If there is at least one people who is popular, then Justin is not curious.
If Quinn is blue-eyed, then Melody is not curious and Crispin is not tall.
If someone is not curious, then he is whispering.
If someone is blue-eyed or he is not curious, then he is not popular.
Crispin is popular if and only if Melody is not whispering.
If Luisa is not curious, then Justin is conscious and Quinn is blue-eyed, and vice versa.
If Joshua is not tall, then Justin is not popular and Crispin is blue-eyed, and vice versa.
Joshua being not curious or Luisa being not blue-eyed implies that Crispin is not conscious.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Crispin is not blue-eyed and Melody is curious.
It can be concluded that Royce is not conscious once knowing that Melody is curious and Justin is not blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is whispering or blue-eyed, then Luisa is popular. | Joshua is not tall. | entailment |
Quinn is not blue-eyed.
Justin is conscious.
Justin is blue-eyed.
Melody is not whispering.
Luisa is not popular.
Crispin is blue-eyed.
Crispin is whispering.
Quinn is not popular.
Joshua is not tall.
Melody is curious.
Joshua is not blue-eyed.
Melody is conscious.Crispin is not whispering if and only if Crispin is not conscious.
If there is at least one people who is popular, then Justin is not curious.
If Quinn is blue-eyed, then Melody is not curious and Crispin is not tall.
If someone is not curious, then he is whispering.
If someone is blue-eyed or he is not curious, then he is not popular.
Crispin is popular if and only if Melody is not whispering.
If Luisa is not curious, then Justin is conscious and Quinn is blue-eyed, and vice versa.
If Joshua is not tall, then Justin is not popular and Crispin is blue-eyed, and vice versa.
Joshua being not curious or Luisa being not blue-eyed implies that Crispin is not conscious.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Crispin is not blue-eyed and Melody is curious.
It can be concluded that Royce is not conscious once knowing that Melody is curious and Justin is not blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is whispering or blue-eyed, then Luisa is popular. | Quinn is curious. | neutral |
Quinn is not blue-eyed.
Justin is conscious.
Justin is blue-eyed.
Melody is not whispering.
Luisa is not popular.
Crispin is blue-eyed.
Crispin is whispering.
Quinn is not popular.
Joshua is not tall.
Melody is curious.
Joshua is not blue-eyed.
Melody is conscious.Crispin is not whispering if and only if Crispin is not conscious.
If there is at least one people who is popular, then Justin is not curious.
If Quinn is blue-eyed, then Melody is not curious and Crispin is not tall.
If someone is not curious, then he is whispering.
If someone is blue-eyed or he is not curious, then he is not popular.
Crispin is popular if and only if Melody is not whispering.
If Luisa is not curious, then Justin is conscious and Quinn is blue-eyed, and vice versa.
If Joshua is not tall, then Justin is not popular and Crispin is blue-eyed, and vice versa.
Joshua being not curious or Luisa being not blue-eyed implies that Crispin is not conscious.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Crispin is not blue-eyed and Melody is curious.
It can be concluded that Royce is not conscious once knowing that Melody is curious and Justin is not blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is whispering or blue-eyed, then Luisa is popular. | Crispin is not popular. | self_contradiction |
Quinn is not blue-eyed.
Justin is conscious.
Justin is blue-eyed.
Melody is not whispering.
Luisa is not popular.
Crispin is blue-eyed.
Crispin is whispering.
Quinn is not popular.
Joshua is not tall.
Melody is curious.
Joshua is not blue-eyed.
Melody is conscious.Crispin is not whispering if and only if Crispin is not conscious.
If there is at least one people who is popular, then Justin is not curious.
If Quinn is blue-eyed, then Melody is not curious and Crispin is not tall.
If someone is not curious, then he is whispering.
If someone is blue-eyed or he is not curious, then he is not popular.
Crispin is popular if and only if Melody is not whispering.
If Luisa is not curious, then Justin is conscious and Quinn is blue-eyed, and vice versa.
If Joshua is not tall, then Justin is not popular and Crispin is blue-eyed, and vice versa.
Joshua being not curious or Luisa being not blue-eyed implies that Crispin is not conscious.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Crispin is not blue-eyed and Melody is curious.
It can be concluded that Royce is not conscious once knowing that Melody is curious and Justin is not blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is whispering or blue-eyed, then Luisa is popular. | Luisa is not popular. | self_contradiction |
Quinn is not blue-eyed.
Justin is conscious.
Justin is blue-eyed.
Melody is not whispering.
Luisa is not popular.
Crispin is blue-eyed.
Crispin is whispering.
Quinn is not popular.
Joshua is not tall.
Melody is curious.
Joshua is not blue-eyed.
Melody is conscious.Crispin is not whispering if and only if Crispin is not conscious.
If there is at least one people who is popular, then Justin is not curious.
If Quinn is blue-eyed, then Melody is not curious and Crispin is not tall.
If someone is not curious, then he is whispering.
If someone is blue-eyed or he is not curious, then he is not popular.
Crispin is popular if and only if Melody is not whispering.
If Luisa is not curious, then Justin is conscious and Quinn is blue-eyed, and vice versa.
If Joshua is not tall, then Justin is not popular and Crispin is blue-eyed, and vice versa.
Joshua being not curious or Luisa being not blue-eyed implies that Crispin is not conscious.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Crispin is not blue-eyed and Melody is curious.
It can be concluded that Royce is not conscious once knowing that Melody is curious and Justin is not blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is whispering or blue-eyed, then Luisa is popular. | Luisa is popular. | self_contradiction |
Jorge is suitable.
Adrian is horrible.
Adrian is suitable.
Olaf is not outstanding.
Carlos is not popular.
Bevis is horrible.
Lars is popular.
Jorge is interesting.
Lars is not interesting.
Lars is outstanding.
Jorge is popular.
Carlos is curious.Lars being popular is equivalent to Adrian being not interesting and Lars being not outstanding.
If there is someone who is horrible, then Olaf is outstanding.
If there is at least one people who is either not interesting or suitable, then Lars is not popular and Caleb is curious.
If there is at least one people who is not interesting or popular, then Olaf is not outstanding.
If there is someone who is horrible, then Olaf is not curious and Adrian is not interesting.
As long as someone is either suitable or outstanding, he is not popular and horrible.
If everyone is popular, then Adrian is not curious.
If Carlos is not horrible, then Jorge is interesting and Olaf is outstanding, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not popular, then Jorge is outstanding and Jorge is not interesting.
If there is someone who is either not horrible or popular, then Bevis is curious.
Adrian being curious and Adrian being suitable are equivalent to Adrian being not popular and Caleb being not outstanding.
If Bevis is popular, then Lars is interesting, and vice versa. | Lars is outstanding. | self_contradiction |
Jorge is suitable.
Adrian is horrible.
Adrian is suitable.
Olaf is not outstanding.
Carlos is not popular.
Bevis is horrible.
Lars is popular.
Jorge is interesting.
Lars is not interesting.
Lars is outstanding.
Jorge is popular.
Carlos is curious.Lars being popular is equivalent to Adrian being not interesting and Lars being not outstanding.
If there is someone who is horrible, then Olaf is outstanding.
If there is at least one people who is either not interesting or suitable, then Lars is not popular and Caleb is curious.
If there is at least one people who is not interesting or popular, then Olaf is not outstanding.
If there is someone who is horrible, then Olaf is not curious and Adrian is not interesting.
As long as someone is either suitable or outstanding, he is not popular and horrible.
If everyone is popular, then Adrian is not curious.
If Carlos is not horrible, then Jorge is interesting and Olaf is outstanding, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not popular, then Jorge is outstanding and Jorge is not interesting.
If there is someone who is either not horrible or popular, then Bevis is curious.
Adrian being curious and Adrian being suitable are equivalent to Adrian being not popular and Caleb being not outstanding.
If Bevis is popular, then Lars is interesting, and vice versa. | Carlos is curious. | entailment |
Jorge is suitable.
Adrian is horrible.
Adrian is suitable.
Olaf is not outstanding.
Carlos is not popular.
Bevis is horrible.
Lars is popular.
Jorge is interesting.
Lars is not interesting.
Lars is outstanding.
Jorge is popular.
Carlos is curious.Lars being popular is equivalent to Adrian being not interesting and Lars being not outstanding.
If there is someone who is horrible, then Olaf is outstanding.
If there is at least one people who is either not interesting or suitable, then Lars is not popular and Caleb is curious.
If there is at least one people who is not interesting or popular, then Olaf is not outstanding.
If there is someone who is horrible, then Olaf is not curious and Adrian is not interesting.
As long as someone is either suitable or outstanding, he is not popular and horrible.
If everyone is popular, then Adrian is not curious.
If Carlos is not horrible, then Jorge is interesting and Olaf is outstanding, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not popular, then Jorge is outstanding and Jorge is not interesting.
If there is someone who is either not horrible or popular, then Bevis is curious.
Adrian being curious and Adrian being suitable are equivalent to Adrian being not popular and Caleb being not outstanding.
If Bevis is popular, then Lars is interesting, and vice versa. | Olaf is not outstanding. | self_contradiction |
Jorge is suitable.
Adrian is horrible.
Adrian is suitable.
Olaf is not outstanding.
Carlos is not popular.
Bevis is horrible.
Lars is popular.
Jorge is interesting.
Lars is not interesting.
Lars is outstanding.
Jorge is popular.
Carlos is curious.Lars being popular is equivalent to Adrian being not interesting and Lars being not outstanding.
If there is someone who is horrible, then Olaf is outstanding.
If there is at least one people who is either not interesting or suitable, then Lars is not popular and Caleb is curious.
If there is at least one people who is not interesting or popular, then Olaf is not outstanding.
If there is someone who is horrible, then Olaf is not curious and Adrian is not interesting.
As long as someone is either suitable or outstanding, he is not popular and horrible.
If everyone is popular, then Adrian is not curious.
If Carlos is not horrible, then Jorge is interesting and Olaf is outstanding, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not popular, then Jorge is outstanding and Jorge is not interesting.
If there is someone who is either not horrible or popular, then Bevis is curious.
Adrian being curious and Adrian being suitable are equivalent to Adrian being not popular and Caleb being not outstanding.
If Bevis is popular, then Lars is interesting, and vice versa. | Jorge is suitable. | entailment |
Jorge is suitable.
Adrian is horrible.
Adrian is suitable.
Olaf is not outstanding.
Carlos is not popular.
Bevis is horrible.
Lars is popular.
Jorge is interesting.
Lars is not interesting.
Lars is outstanding.
Jorge is popular.
Carlos is curious.Lars being popular is equivalent to Adrian being not interesting and Lars being not outstanding.
If there is someone who is horrible, then Olaf is outstanding.
If there is at least one people who is either not interesting or suitable, then Lars is not popular and Caleb is curious.
If there is at least one people who is not interesting or popular, then Olaf is not outstanding.
If there is someone who is horrible, then Olaf is not curious and Adrian is not interesting.
As long as someone is either suitable or outstanding, he is not popular and horrible.
If everyone is popular, then Adrian is not curious.
If Carlos is not horrible, then Jorge is interesting and Olaf is outstanding, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not popular, then Jorge is outstanding and Jorge is not interesting.
If there is someone who is either not horrible or popular, then Bevis is curious.
Adrian being curious and Adrian being suitable are equivalent to Adrian being not popular and Caleb being not outstanding.
If Bevis is popular, then Lars is interesting, and vice versa. | Bevis is outstanding. | neutral |
Jorge is suitable.
Adrian is horrible.
Adrian is suitable.
Olaf is not outstanding.
Carlos is not popular.
Bevis is horrible.
Lars is popular.
Jorge is interesting.
Lars is not interesting.
Lars is outstanding.
Jorge is popular.
Carlos is curious.Lars being popular is equivalent to Adrian being not interesting and Lars being not outstanding.
If there is someone who is horrible, then Olaf is outstanding.
If there is at least one people who is either not interesting or suitable, then Lars is not popular and Caleb is curious.
If there is at least one people who is not interesting or popular, then Olaf is not outstanding.
If there is someone who is horrible, then Olaf is not curious and Adrian is not interesting.
As long as someone is either suitable or outstanding, he is not popular and horrible.
If everyone is popular, then Adrian is not curious.
If Carlos is not horrible, then Jorge is interesting and Olaf is outstanding, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not popular, then Jorge is outstanding and Jorge is not interesting.
If there is someone who is either not horrible or popular, then Bevis is curious.
Adrian being curious and Adrian being suitable are equivalent to Adrian being not popular and Caleb being not outstanding.
If Bevis is popular, then Lars is interesting, and vice versa. | Lars is not outstanding. | self_contradiction |
Jorge is suitable.
Adrian is horrible.
Adrian is suitable.
Olaf is not outstanding.
Carlos is not popular.
Bevis is horrible.
Lars is popular.
Jorge is interesting.
Lars is not interesting.
Lars is outstanding.
Jorge is popular.
Carlos is curious.Lars being popular is equivalent to Adrian being not interesting and Lars being not outstanding.
If there is someone who is horrible, then Olaf is outstanding.
If there is at least one people who is either not interesting or suitable, then Lars is not popular and Caleb is curious.
If there is at least one people who is not interesting or popular, then Olaf is not outstanding.
If there is someone who is horrible, then Olaf is not curious and Adrian is not interesting.
As long as someone is either suitable or outstanding, he is not popular and horrible.
If everyone is popular, then Adrian is not curious.
If Carlos is not horrible, then Jorge is interesting and Olaf is outstanding, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not popular, then Jorge is outstanding and Jorge is not interesting.
If there is someone who is either not horrible or popular, then Bevis is curious.
Adrian being curious and Adrian being suitable are equivalent to Adrian being not popular and Caleb being not outstanding.
If Bevis is popular, then Lars is interesting, and vice versa. | Lars is curious. | neutral |
Jorge is suitable.
Adrian is horrible.
Adrian is suitable.
Olaf is not outstanding.
Carlos is not popular.
Bevis is horrible.
Lars is popular.
Jorge is interesting.
Lars is not interesting.
Lars is outstanding.
Jorge is popular.
Carlos is curious.Lars being popular is equivalent to Adrian being not interesting and Lars being not outstanding.
If there is someone who is horrible, then Olaf is outstanding.
If there is at least one people who is either not interesting or suitable, then Lars is not popular and Caleb is curious.
If there is at least one people who is not interesting or popular, then Olaf is not outstanding.
If there is someone who is horrible, then Olaf is not curious and Adrian is not interesting.
As long as someone is either suitable or outstanding, he is not popular and horrible.
If everyone is popular, then Adrian is not curious.
If Carlos is not horrible, then Jorge is interesting and Olaf is outstanding, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not popular, then Jorge is outstanding and Jorge is not interesting.
If there is someone who is either not horrible or popular, then Bevis is curious.
Adrian being curious and Adrian being suitable are equivalent to Adrian being not popular and Caleb being not outstanding.
If Bevis is popular, then Lars is interesting, and vice versa. | Bevis is popular. | neutral |
Jorge is suitable.
Adrian is horrible.
Adrian is suitable.
Olaf is not outstanding.
Carlos is not popular.
Bevis is horrible.
Lars is popular.
Jorge is interesting.
Lars is not interesting.
Lars is outstanding.
Jorge is popular.
Carlos is curious.Lars being popular is equivalent to Adrian being not interesting and Lars being not outstanding.
If there is someone who is horrible, then Olaf is outstanding.
If there is at least one people who is either not interesting or suitable, then Lars is not popular and Caleb is curious.
If there is at least one people who is not interesting or popular, then Olaf is not outstanding.
If there is someone who is horrible, then Olaf is not curious and Adrian is not interesting.
As long as someone is either suitable or outstanding, he is not popular and horrible.
If everyone is popular, then Adrian is not curious.
If Carlos is not horrible, then Jorge is interesting and Olaf is outstanding, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not popular, then Jorge is outstanding and Jorge is not interesting.
If there is someone who is either not horrible or popular, then Bevis is curious.
Adrian being curious and Adrian being suitable are equivalent to Adrian being not popular and Caleb being not outstanding.
If Bevis is popular, then Lars is interesting, and vice versa. | Olaf is not popular. | entailment |
Jorge is suitable.
Adrian is horrible.
Adrian is suitable.
Olaf is not outstanding.
Carlos is not popular.
Bevis is horrible.
Lars is popular.
Jorge is interesting.
Lars is not interesting.
Lars is outstanding.
Jorge is popular.
Carlos is curious.Lars being popular is equivalent to Adrian being not interesting and Lars being not outstanding.
If there is someone who is horrible, then Olaf is outstanding.
If there is at least one people who is either not interesting or suitable, then Lars is not popular and Caleb is curious.
If there is at least one people who is not interesting or popular, then Olaf is not outstanding.
If there is someone who is horrible, then Olaf is not curious and Adrian is not interesting.
As long as someone is either suitable or outstanding, he is not popular and horrible.
If everyone is popular, then Adrian is not curious.
If Carlos is not horrible, then Jorge is interesting and Olaf is outstanding, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not popular, then Jorge is outstanding and Jorge is not interesting.
If there is someone who is either not horrible or popular, then Bevis is curious.
Adrian being curious and Adrian being suitable are equivalent to Adrian being not popular and Caleb being not outstanding.
If Bevis is popular, then Lars is interesting, and vice versa. | Olaf is curious. | contradiction |
Jorge is suitable.
Adrian is horrible.
Adrian is suitable.
Olaf is not outstanding.
Carlos is not popular.
Bevis is horrible.
Lars is popular.
Jorge is interesting.
Lars is not interesting.
Lars is outstanding.
Jorge is popular.
Carlos is curious.Lars being popular is equivalent to Adrian being not interesting and Lars being not outstanding.
If there is someone who is horrible, then Olaf is outstanding.
If there is at least one people who is either not interesting or suitable, then Lars is not popular and Caleb is curious.
If there is at least one people who is not interesting or popular, then Olaf is not outstanding.
If there is someone who is horrible, then Olaf is not curious and Adrian is not interesting.
As long as someone is either suitable or outstanding, he is not popular and horrible.
If everyone is popular, then Adrian is not curious.
If Carlos is not horrible, then Jorge is interesting and Olaf is outstanding, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not popular, then Jorge is outstanding and Jorge is not interesting.
If there is someone who is either not horrible or popular, then Bevis is curious.
Adrian being curious and Adrian being suitable are equivalent to Adrian being not popular and Caleb being not outstanding.
If Bevis is popular, then Lars is interesting, and vice versa. | Bevis is not horrible. | contradiction |
Jorge is suitable.
Adrian is horrible.
Adrian is suitable.
Olaf is not outstanding.
Carlos is not popular.
Bevis is horrible.
Lars is popular.
Jorge is interesting.
Lars is not interesting.
Lars is outstanding.
Jorge is popular.
Carlos is curious.Lars being popular is equivalent to Adrian being not interesting and Lars being not outstanding.
If there is someone who is horrible, then Olaf is outstanding.
If there is at least one people who is either not interesting or suitable, then Lars is not popular and Caleb is curious.
If there is at least one people who is not interesting or popular, then Olaf is not outstanding.
If there is someone who is horrible, then Olaf is not curious and Adrian is not interesting.
As long as someone is either suitable or outstanding, he is not popular and horrible.
If everyone is popular, then Adrian is not curious.
If Carlos is not horrible, then Jorge is interesting and Olaf is outstanding, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not popular, then Jorge is outstanding and Jorge is not interesting.
If there is someone who is either not horrible or popular, then Bevis is curious.
Adrian being curious and Adrian being suitable are equivalent to Adrian being not popular and Caleb being not outstanding.
If Bevis is popular, then Lars is interesting, and vice versa. | Olaf is outstanding. | self_contradiction |
Jorge is suitable.
Adrian is horrible.
Adrian is suitable.
Olaf is not outstanding.
Carlos is not popular.
Bevis is horrible.
Lars is popular.
Jorge is interesting.
Lars is not interesting.
Lars is outstanding.
Jorge is popular.
Carlos is curious.Lars being popular is equivalent to Adrian being not interesting and Lars being not outstanding.
If there is someone who is horrible, then Olaf is outstanding.
If there is at least one people who is either not interesting or suitable, then Lars is not popular and Caleb is curious.
If there is at least one people who is not interesting or popular, then Olaf is not outstanding.
If there is someone who is horrible, then Olaf is not curious and Adrian is not interesting.
As long as someone is either suitable or outstanding, he is not popular and horrible.
If everyone is popular, then Adrian is not curious.
If Carlos is not horrible, then Jorge is interesting and Olaf is outstanding, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not popular, then Jorge is outstanding and Jorge is not interesting.
If there is someone who is either not horrible or popular, then Bevis is curious.
Adrian being curious and Adrian being suitable are equivalent to Adrian being not popular and Caleb being not outstanding.
If Bevis is popular, then Lars is interesting, and vice versa. | Carlos is horrible. | contradiction |
Jorge is suitable.
Adrian is horrible.
Adrian is suitable.
Olaf is not outstanding.
Carlos is not popular.
Bevis is horrible.
Lars is popular.
Jorge is interesting.
Lars is not interesting.
Lars is outstanding.
Jorge is popular.
Carlos is curious.Lars being popular is equivalent to Adrian being not interesting and Lars being not outstanding.
If there is someone who is horrible, then Olaf is outstanding.
If there is at least one people who is either not interesting or suitable, then Lars is not popular and Caleb is curious.
If there is at least one people who is not interesting or popular, then Olaf is not outstanding.
If there is someone who is horrible, then Olaf is not curious and Adrian is not interesting.
As long as someone is either suitable or outstanding, he is not popular and horrible.
If everyone is popular, then Adrian is not curious.
If Carlos is not horrible, then Jorge is interesting and Olaf is outstanding, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not popular, then Jorge is outstanding and Jorge is not interesting.
If there is someone who is either not horrible or popular, then Bevis is curious.
Adrian being curious and Adrian being suitable are equivalent to Adrian being not popular and Caleb being not outstanding.
If Bevis is popular, then Lars is interesting, and vice versa. | Jorge is outstanding. | entailment |
Jorge is suitable.
Adrian is horrible.
Adrian is suitable.
Olaf is not outstanding.
Carlos is not popular.
Bevis is horrible.
Lars is popular.
Jorge is interesting.
Lars is not interesting.
Lars is outstanding.
Jorge is popular.
Carlos is curious.Lars being popular is equivalent to Adrian being not interesting and Lars being not outstanding.
If there is someone who is horrible, then Olaf is outstanding.
If there is at least one people who is either not interesting or suitable, then Lars is not popular and Caleb is curious.
If there is at least one people who is not interesting or popular, then Olaf is not outstanding.
If there is someone who is horrible, then Olaf is not curious and Adrian is not interesting.
As long as someone is either suitable or outstanding, he is not popular and horrible.
If everyone is popular, then Adrian is not curious.
If Carlos is not horrible, then Jorge is interesting and Olaf is outstanding, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not popular, then Jorge is outstanding and Jorge is not interesting.
If there is someone who is either not horrible or popular, then Bevis is curious.
Adrian being curious and Adrian being suitable are equivalent to Adrian being not popular and Caleb being not outstanding.
If Bevis is popular, then Lars is interesting, and vice versa. | Adrian is not horrible. | contradiction |
Jorge is suitable.
Adrian is horrible.
Adrian is suitable.
Olaf is not outstanding.
Carlos is not popular.
Bevis is horrible.
Lars is popular.
Jorge is interesting.
Lars is not interesting.
Lars is outstanding.
Jorge is popular.
Carlos is curious.Lars being popular is equivalent to Adrian being not interesting and Lars being not outstanding.
If there is someone who is horrible, then Olaf is outstanding.
If there is at least one people who is either not interesting or suitable, then Lars is not popular and Caleb is curious.
If there is at least one people who is not interesting or popular, then Olaf is not outstanding.
If there is someone who is horrible, then Olaf is not curious and Adrian is not interesting.
As long as someone is either suitable or outstanding, he is not popular and horrible.
If everyone is popular, then Adrian is not curious.
If Carlos is not horrible, then Jorge is interesting and Olaf is outstanding, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not popular, then Jorge is outstanding and Jorge is not interesting.
If there is someone who is either not horrible or popular, then Bevis is curious.
Adrian being curious and Adrian being suitable are equivalent to Adrian being not popular and Caleb being not outstanding.
If Bevis is popular, then Lars is interesting, and vice versa. | Adrian is not suitable. | contradiction |
Jorge is suitable.
Adrian is horrible.
Adrian is suitable.
Olaf is not outstanding.
Carlos is not popular.
Bevis is horrible.
Lars is popular.
Jorge is interesting.
Lars is not interesting.
Lars is outstanding.
Jorge is popular.
Carlos is curious.Lars being popular is equivalent to Adrian being not interesting and Lars being not outstanding.
If there is someone who is horrible, then Olaf is outstanding.
If there is at least one people who is either not interesting or suitable, then Lars is not popular and Caleb is curious.
If there is at least one people who is not interesting or popular, then Olaf is not outstanding.
If there is someone who is horrible, then Olaf is not curious and Adrian is not interesting.
As long as someone is either suitable or outstanding, he is not popular and horrible.
If everyone is popular, then Adrian is not curious.
If Carlos is not horrible, then Jorge is interesting and Olaf is outstanding, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not popular, then Jorge is outstanding and Jorge is not interesting.
If there is someone who is either not horrible or popular, then Bevis is curious.
Adrian being curious and Adrian being suitable are equivalent to Adrian being not popular and Caleb being not outstanding.
If Bevis is popular, then Lars is interesting, and vice versa. | Lars is horrible. | entailment |
Jorge is suitable.
Adrian is horrible.
Adrian is suitable.
Olaf is not outstanding.
Carlos is not popular.
Bevis is horrible.
Lars is popular.
Jorge is interesting.
Lars is not interesting.
Lars is outstanding.
Jorge is popular.
Carlos is curious.Lars being popular is equivalent to Adrian being not interesting and Lars being not outstanding.
If there is someone who is horrible, then Olaf is outstanding.
If there is at least one people who is either not interesting or suitable, then Lars is not popular and Caleb is curious.
If there is at least one people who is not interesting or popular, then Olaf is not outstanding.
If there is someone who is horrible, then Olaf is not curious and Adrian is not interesting.
As long as someone is either suitable or outstanding, he is not popular and horrible.
If everyone is popular, then Adrian is not curious.
If Carlos is not horrible, then Jorge is interesting and Olaf is outstanding, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not popular, then Jorge is outstanding and Jorge is not interesting.
If there is someone who is either not horrible or popular, then Bevis is curious.
Adrian being curious and Adrian being suitable are equivalent to Adrian being not popular and Caleb being not outstanding.
If Bevis is popular, then Lars is interesting, and vice versa. | Lars is suitable. | neutral |
Jorge is suitable.
Adrian is horrible.
Adrian is suitable.
Olaf is not outstanding.
Carlos is not popular.
Bevis is horrible.
Lars is popular.
Jorge is interesting.
Lars is not interesting.
Lars is outstanding.
Jorge is popular.
Carlos is curious.Lars being popular is equivalent to Adrian being not interesting and Lars being not outstanding.
If there is someone who is horrible, then Olaf is outstanding.
If there is at least one people who is either not interesting or suitable, then Lars is not popular and Caleb is curious.
If there is at least one people who is not interesting or popular, then Olaf is not outstanding.
If there is someone who is horrible, then Olaf is not curious and Adrian is not interesting.
As long as someone is either suitable or outstanding, he is not popular and horrible.
If everyone is popular, then Adrian is not curious.
If Carlos is not horrible, then Jorge is interesting and Olaf is outstanding, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not popular, then Jorge is outstanding and Jorge is not interesting.
If there is someone who is either not horrible or popular, then Bevis is curious.
Adrian being curious and Adrian being suitable are equivalent to Adrian being not popular and Caleb being not outstanding.
If Bevis is popular, then Lars is interesting, and vice versa. | Adrian is not curious. | neutral |
Jorge is suitable.
Adrian is horrible.
Adrian is suitable.
Olaf is not outstanding.
Carlos is not popular.
Bevis is horrible.
Lars is popular.
Jorge is interesting.
Lars is not interesting.
Lars is outstanding.
Jorge is popular.
Carlos is curious.Lars being popular is equivalent to Adrian being not interesting and Lars being not outstanding.
If there is someone who is horrible, then Olaf is outstanding.
If there is at least one people who is either not interesting or suitable, then Lars is not popular and Caleb is curious.
If there is at least one people who is not interesting or popular, then Olaf is not outstanding.
If there is someone who is horrible, then Olaf is not curious and Adrian is not interesting.
As long as someone is either suitable or outstanding, he is not popular and horrible.
If everyone is popular, then Adrian is not curious.
If Carlos is not horrible, then Jorge is interesting and Olaf is outstanding, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not popular, then Jorge is outstanding and Jorge is not interesting.
If there is someone who is either not horrible or popular, then Bevis is curious.
Adrian being curious and Adrian being suitable are equivalent to Adrian being not popular and Caleb being not outstanding.
If Bevis is popular, then Lars is interesting, and vice versa. | Jorge is popular. | self_contradiction |
Stefan is not intelligent.
Melody is not intelligent.
Solomon is frightened.
Odessa is not conscientious.
Philbert is intelligent.
Melody is not friendly.
Solomon is not conscientious.
Odessa is frightened.
Solomon is not embarrassed.
Melody is not impossible.
Melody is conscientious.
Stefan is not embarrassed.Someone who is eithor intelligent or frightened is always embarrassed.
Melody is conscientious if and only if Philbert is not embarrassed and Melody is intelligent.
If Philbert is not friendly, then Tyler is not intelligent.
If someone is both friendly and not embarrassed, then he is not frightened.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Melody is not conscientious.
Someone being not friendly is equivalent to being conscientious.
Stefan being embarrassed implies that Solomon is frightened and Tyler is not friendly.
If Philbert is not conscientious or Tyler is impossible, then Melody is not embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Tyler is not impossible and Helena is friendly once knowing that Stefan is embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Stefan is impossible once knowing that Stefan is not friendly or Helena is conscientious.
Someone is not embarrassed and not impossible if and only if he is not friendly and frightened.
If there is nobody who is not friendly, then Solomon is conscientious. | Melody is not embarrassed. | contradiction |
Stefan is not intelligent.
Melody is not intelligent.
Solomon is frightened.
Odessa is not conscientious.
Philbert is intelligent.
Melody is not friendly.
Solomon is not conscientious.
Odessa is frightened.
Solomon is not embarrassed.
Melody is not impossible.
Melody is conscientious.
Stefan is not embarrassed.Someone who is eithor intelligent or frightened is always embarrassed.
Melody is conscientious if and only if Philbert is not embarrassed and Melody is intelligent.
If Philbert is not friendly, then Tyler is not intelligent.
If someone is both friendly and not embarrassed, then he is not frightened.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Melody is not conscientious.
Someone being not friendly is equivalent to being conscientious.
Stefan being embarrassed implies that Solomon is frightened and Tyler is not friendly.
If Philbert is not conscientious or Tyler is impossible, then Melody is not embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Tyler is not impossible and Helena is friendly once knowing that Stefan is embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Stefan is impossible once knowing that Stefan is not friendly or Helena is conscientious.
Someone is not embarrassed and not impossible if and only if he is not friendly and frightened.
If there is nobody who is not friendly, then Solomon is conscientious. | Odessa is not conscientious. | entailment |
Stefan is not intelligent.
Melody is not intelligent.
Solomon is frightened.
Odessa is not conscientious.
Philbert is intelligent.
Melody is not friendly.
Solomon is not conscientious.
Odessa is frightened.
Solomon is not embarrassed.
Melody is not impossible.
Melody is conscientious.
Stefan is not embarrassed.Someone who is eithor intelligent or frightened is always embarrassed.
Melody is conscientious if and only if Philbert is not embarrassed and Melody is intelligent.
If Philbert is not friendly, then Tyler is not intelligent.
If someone is both friendly and not embarrassed, then he is not frightened.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Melody is not conscientious.
Someone being not friendly is equivalent to being conscientious.
Stefan being embarrassed implies that Solomon is frightened and Tyler is not friendly.
If Philbert is not conscientious or Tyler is impossible, then Melody is not embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Tyler is not impossible and Helena is friendly once knowing that Stefan is embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Stefan is impossible once knowing that Stefan is not friendly or Helena is conscientious.
Someone is not embarrassed and not impossible if and only if he is not friendly and frightened.
If there is nobody who is not friendly, then Solomon is conscientious. | Melody is impossible. | contradiction |
Stefan is not intelligent.
Melody is not intelligent.
Solomon is frightened.
Odessa is not conscientious.
Philbert is intelligent.
Melody is not friendly.
Solomon is not conscientious.
Odessa is frightened.
Solomon is not embarrassed.
Melody is not impossible.
Melody is conscientious.
Stefan is not embarrassed.Someone who is eithor intelligent or frightened is always embarrassed.
Melody is conscientious if and only if Philbert is not embarrassed and Melody is intelligent.
If Philbert is not friendly, then Tyler is not intelligent.
If someone is both friendly and not embarrassed, then he is not frightened.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Melody is not conscientious.
Someone being not friendly is equivalent to being conscientious.
Stefan being embarrassed implies that Solomon is frightened and Tyler is not friendly.
If Philbert is not conscientious or Tyler is impossible, then Melody is not embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Tyler is not impossible and Helena is friendly once knowing that Stefan is embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Stefan is impossible once knowing that Stefan is not friendly or Helena is conscientious.
Someone is not embarrassed and not impossible if and only if he is not friendly and frightened.
If there is nobody who is not friendly, then Solomon is conscientious. | Solomon is not embarrassed. | self_contradiction |
Stefan is not intelligent.
Melody is not intelligent.
Solomon is frightened.
Odessa is not conscientious.
Philbert is intelligent.
Melody is not friendly.
Solomon is not conscientious.
Odessa is frightened.
Solomon is not embarrassed.
Melody is not impossible.
Melody is conscientious.
Stefan is not embarrassed.Someone who is eithor intelligent or frightened is always embarrassed.
Melody is conscientious if and only if Philbert is not embarrassed and Melody is intelligent.
If Philbert is not friendly, then Tyler is not intelligent.
If someone is both friendly and not embarrassed, then he is not frightened.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Melody is not conscientious.
Someone being not friendly is equivalent to being conscientious.
Stefan being embarrassed implies that Solomon is frightened and Tyler is not friendly.
If Philbert is not conscientious or Tyler is impossible, then Melody is not embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Tyler is not impossible and Helena is friendly once knowing that Stefan is embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Stefan is impossible once knowing that Stefan is not friendly or Helena is conscientious.
Someone is not embarrassed and not impossible if and only if he is not friendly and frightened.
If there is nobody who is not friendly, then Solomon is conscientious. | Solomon is conscientious. | contradiction |
Stefan is not intelligent.
Melody is not intelligent.
Solomon is frightened.
Odessa is not conscientious.
Philbert is intelligent.
Melody is not friendly.
Solomon is not conscientious.
Odessa is frightened.
Solomon is not embarrassed.
Melody is not impossible.
Melody is conscientious.
Stefan is not embarrassed.Someone who is eithor intelligent or frightened is always embarrassed.
Melody is conscientious if and only if Philbert is not embarrassed and Melody is intelligent.
If Philbert is not friendly, then Tyler is not intelligent.
If someone is both friendly and not embarrassed, then he is not frightened.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Melody is not conscientious.
Someone being not friendly is equivalent to being conscientious.
Stefan being embarrassed implies that Solomon is frightened and Tyler is not friendly.
If Philbert is not conscientious or Tyler is impossible, then Melody is not embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Tyler is not impossible and Helena is friendly once knowing that Stefan is embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Stefan is impossible once knowing that Stefan is not friendly or Helena is conscientious.
Someone is not embarrassed and not impossible if and only if he is not friendly and frightened.
If there is nobody who is not friendly, then Solomon is conscientious. | Odessa is not embarrassed. | contradiction |
Stefan is not intelligent.
Melody is not intelligent.
Solomon is frightened.
Odessa is not conscientious.
Philbert is intelligent.
Melody is not friendly.
Solomon is not conscientious.
Odessa is frightened.
Solomon is not embarrassed.
Melody is not impossible.
Melody is conscientious.
Stefan is not embarrassed.Someone who is eithor intelligent or frightened is always embarrassed.
Melody is conscientious if and only if Philbert is not embarrassed and Melody is intelligent.
If Philbert is not friendly, then Tyler is not intelligent.
If someone is both friendly and not embarrassed, then he is not frightened.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Melody is not conscientious.
Someone being not friendly is equivalent to being conscientious.
Stefan being embarrassed implies that Solomon is frightened and Tyler is not friendly.
If Philbert is not conscientious or Tyler is impossible, then Melody is not embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Tyler is not impossible and Helena is friendly once knowing that Stefan is embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Stefan is impossible once knowing that Stefan is not friendly or Helena is conscientious.
Someone is not embarrassed and not impossible if and only if he is not friendly and frightened.
If there is nobody who is not friendly, then Solomon is conscientious. | Philbert is not intelligent. | contradiction |
Stefan is not intelligent.
Melody is not intelligent.
Solomon is frightened.
Odessa is not conscientious.
Philbert is intelligent.
Melody is not friendly.
Solomon is not conscientious.
Odessa is frightened.
Solomon is not embarrassed.
Melody is not impossible.
Melody is conscientious.
Stefan is not embarrassed.Someone who is eithor intelligent or frightened is always embarrassed.
Melody is conscientious if and only if Philbert is not embarrassed and Melody is intelligent.
If Philbert is not friendly, then Tyler is not intelligent.
If someone is both friendly and not embarrassed, then he is not frightened.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Melody is not conscientious.
Someone being not friendly is equivalent to being conscientious.
Stefan being embarrassed implies that Solomon is frightened and Tyler is not friendly.
If Philbert is not conscientious or Tyler is impossible, then Melody is not embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Tyler is not impossible and Helena is friendly once knowing that Stefan is embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Stefan is impossible once knowing that Stefan is not friendly or Helena is conscientious.
Someone is not embarrassed and not impossible if and only if he is not friendly and frightened.
If there is nobody who is not friendly, then Solomon is conscientious. | Solomon is embarrassed. | self_contradiction |
Stefan is not intelligent.
Melody is not intelligent.
Solomon is frightened.
Odessa is not conscientious.
Philbert is intelligent.
Melody is not friendly.
Solomon is not conscientious.
Odessa is frightened.
Solomon is not embarrassed.
Melody is not impossible.
Melody is conscientious.
Stefan is not embarrassed.Someone who is eithor intelligent or frightened is always embarrassed.
Melody is conscientious if and only if Philbert is not embarrassed and Melody is intelligent.
If Philbert is not friendly, then Tyler is not intelligent.
If someone is both friendly and not embarrassed, then he is not frightened.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Melody is not conscientious.
Someone being not friendly is equivalent to being conscientious.
Stefan being embarrassed implies that Solomon is frightened and Tyler is not friendly.
If Philbert is not conscientious or Tyler is impossible, then Melody is not embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Tyler is not impossible and Helena is friendly once knowing that Stefan is embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Stefan is impossible once knowing that Stefan is not friendly or Helena is conscientious.
Someone is not embarrassed and not impossible if and only if he is not friendly and frightened.
If there is nobody who is not friendly, then Solomon is conscientious. | Melody is not intelligent. | self_contradiction |
Stefan is not intelligent.
Melody is not intelligent.
Solomon is frightened.
Odessa is not conscientious.
Philbert is intelligent.
Melody is not friendly.
Solomon is not conscientious.
Odessa is frightened.
Solomon is not embarrassed.
Melody is not impossible.
Melody is conscientious.
Stefan is not embarrassed.Someone who is eithor intelligent or frightened is always embarrassed.
Melody is conscientious if and only if Philbert is not embarrassed and Melody is intelligent.
If Philbert is not friendly, then Tyler is not intelligent.
If someone is both friendly and not embarrassed, then he is not frightened.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Melody is not conscientious.
Someone being not friendly is equivalent to being conscientious.
Stefan being embarrassed implies that Solomon is frightened and Tyler is not friendly.
If Philbert is not conscientious or Tyler is impossible, then Melody is not embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Tyler is not impossible and Helena is friendly once knowing that Stefan is embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Stefan is impossible once knowing that Stefan is not friendly or Helena is conscientious.
Someone is not embarrassed and not impossible if and only if he is not friendly and frightened.
If there is nobody who is not friendly, then Solomon is conscientious. | Solomon is friendly. | neutral |
Stefan is not intelligent.
Melody is not intelligent.
Solomon is frightened.
Odessa is not conscientious.
Philbert is intelligent.
Melody is not friendly.
Solomon is not conscientious.
Odessa is frightened.
Solomon is not embarrassed.
Melody is not impossible.
Melody is conscientious.
Stefan is not embarrassed.Someone who is eithor intelligent or frightened is always embarrassed.
Melody is conscientious if and only if Philbert is not embarrassed and Melody is intelligent.
If Philbert is not friendly, then Tyler is not intelligent.
If someone is both friendly and not embarrassed, then he is not frightened.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Melody is not conscientious.
Someone being not friendly is equivalent to being conscientious.
Stefan being embarrassed implies that Solomon is frightened and Tyler is not friendly.
If Philbert is not conscientious or Tyler is impossible, then Melody is not embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Tyler is not impossible and Helena is friendly once knowing that Stefan is embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Stefan is impossible once knowing that Stefan is not friendly or Helena is conscientious.
Someone is not embarrassed and not impossible if and only if he is not friendly and frightened.
If there is nobody who is not friendly, then Solomon is conscientious. | Tyler is not frightened. | neutral |
Stefan is not intelligent.
Melody is not intelligent.
Solomon is frightened.
Odessa is not conscientious.
Philbert is intelligent.
Melody is not friendly.
Solomon is not conscientious.
Odessa is frightened.
Solomon is not embarrassed.
Melody is not impossible.
Melody is conscientious.
Stefan is not embarrassed.Someone who is eithor intelligent or frightened is always embarrassed.
Melody is conscientious if and only if Philbert is not embarrassed and Melody is intelligent.
If Philbert is not friendly, then Tyler is not intelligent.
If someone is both friendly and not embarrassed, then he is not frightened.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Melody is not conscientious.
Someone being not friendly is equivalent to being conscientious.
Stefan being embarrassed implies that Solomon is frightened and Tyler is not friendly.
If Philbert is not conscientious or Tyler is impossible, then Melody is not embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Tyler is not impossible and Helena is friendly once knowing that Stefan is embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Stefan is impossible once knowing that Stefan is not friendly or Helena is conscientious.
Someone is not embarrassed and not impossible if and only if he is not friendly and frightened.
If there is nobody who is not friendly, then Solomon is conscientious. | Odessa is embarrassed. | entailment |
Stefan is not intelligent.
Melody is not intelligent.
Solomon is frightened.
Odessa is not conscientious.
Philbert is intelligent.
Melody is not friendly.
Solomon is not conscientious.
Odessa is frightened.
Solomon is not embarrassed.
Melody is not impossible.
Melody is conscientious.
Stefan is not embarrassed.Someone who is eithor intelligent or frightened is always embarrassed.
Melody is conscientious if and only if Philbert is not embarrassed and Melody is intelligent.
If Philbert is not friendly, then Tyler is not intelligent.
If someone is both friendly and not embarrassed, then he is not frightened.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Melody is not conscientious.
Someone being not friendly is equivalent to being conscientious.
Stefan being embarrassed implies that Solomon is frightened and Tyler is not friendly.
If Philbert is not conscientious or Tyler is impossible, then Melody is not embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Tyler is not impossible and Helena is friendly once knowing that Stefan is embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Stefan is impossible once knowing that Stefan is not friendly or Helena is conscientious.
Someone is not embarrassed and not impossible if and only if he is not friendly and frightened.
If there is nobody who is not friendly, then Solomon is conscientious. | Melody is conscientious. | entailment |
Stefan is not intelligent.
Melody is not intelligent.
Solomon is frightened.
Odessa is not conscientious.
Philbert is intelligent.
Melody is not friendly.
Solomon is not conscientious.
Odessa is frightened.
Solomon is not embarrassed.
Melody is not impossible.
Melody is conscientious.
Stefan is not embarrassed.Someone who is eithor intelligent or frightened is always embarrassed.
Melody is conscientious if and only if Philbert is not embarrassed and Melody is intelligent.
If Philbert is not friendly, then Tyler is not intelligent.
If someone is both friendly and not embarrassed, then he is not frightened.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Melody is not conscientious.
Someone being not friendly is equivalent to being conscientious.
Stefan being embarrassed implies that Solomon is frightened and Tyler is not friendly.
If Philbert is not conscientious or Tyler is impossible, then Melody is not embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Tyler is not impossible and Helena is friendly once knowing that Stefan is embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Stefan is impossible once knowing that Stefan is not friendly or Helena is conscientious.
Someone is not embarrassed and not impossible if and only if he is not friendly and frightened.
If there is nobody who is not friendly, then Solomon is conscientious. | Philbert is not embarrassed. | self_contradiction |
Stefan is not intelligent.
Melody is not intelligent.
Solomon is frightened.
Odessa is not conscientious.
Philbert is intelligent.
Melody is not friendly.
Solomon is not conscientious.
Odessa is frightened.
Solomon is not embarrassed.
Melody is not impossible.
Melody is conscientious.
Stefan is not embarrassed.Someone who is eithor intelligent or frightened is always embarrassed.
Melody is conscientious if and only if Philbert is not embarrassed and Melody is intelligent.
If Philbert is not friendly, then Tyler is not intelligent.
If someone is both friendly and not embarrassed, then he is not frightened.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Melody is not conscientious.
Someone being not friendly is equivalent to being conscientious.
Stefan being embarrassed implies that Solomon is frightened and Tyler is not friendly.
If Philbert is not conscientious or Tyler is impossible, then Melody is not embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Tyler is not impossible and Helena is friendly once knowing that Stefan is embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Stefan is impossible once knowing that Stefan is not friendly or Helena is conscientious.
Someone is not embarrassed and not impossible if and only if he is not friendly and frightened.
If there is nobody who is not friendly, then Solomon is conscientious. | Tyler is friendly. | neutral |
Stefan is not intelligent.
Melody is not intelligent.
Solomon is frightened.
Odessa is not conscientious.
Philbert is intelligent.
Melody is not friendly.
Solomon is not conscientious.
Odessa is frightened.
Solomon is not embarrassed.
Melody is not impossible.
Melody is conscientious.
Stefan is not embarrassed.Someone who is eithor intelligent or frightened is always embarrassed.
Melody is conscientious if and only if Philbert is not embarrassed and Melody is intelligent.
If Philbert is not friendly, then Tyler is not intelligent.
If someone is both friendly and not embarrassed, then he is not frightened.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Melody is not conscientious.
Someone being not friendly is equivalent to being conscientious.
Stefan being embarrassed implies that Solomon is frightened and Tyler is not friendly.
If Philbert is not conscientious or Tyler is impossible, then Melody is not embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Tyler is not impossible and Helena is friendly once knowing that Stefan is embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Stefan is impossible once knowing that Stefan is not friendly or Helena is conscientious.
Someone is not embarrassed and not impossible if and only if he is not friendly and frightened.
If there is nobody who is not friendly, then Solomon is conscientious. | Helena is not impossible. | neutral |
Stefan is not intelligent.
Melody is not intelligent.
Solomon is frightened.
Odessa is not conscientious.
Philbert is intelligent.
Melody is not friendly.
Solomon is not conscientious.
Odessa is frightened.
Solomon is not embarrassed.
Melody is not impossible.
Melody is conscientious.
Stefan is not embarrassed.Someone who is eithor intelligent or frightened is always embarrassed.
Melody is conscientious if and only if Philbert is not embarrassed and Melody is intelligent.
If Philbert is not friendly, then Tyler is not intelligent.
If someone is both friendly and not embarrassed, then he is not frightened.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Melody is not conscientious.
Someone being not friendly is equivalent to being conscientious.
Stefan being embarrassed implies that Solomon is frightened and Tyler is not friendly.
If Philbert is not conscientious or Tyler is impossible, then Melody is not embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Tyler is not impossible and Helena is friendly once knowing that Stefan is embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Stefan is impossible once knowing that Stefan is not friendly or Helena is conscientious.
Someone is not embarrassed and not impossible if and only if he is not friendly and frightened.
If there is nobody who is not friendly, then Solomon is conscientious. | Melody is not impossible. | entailment |
Stefan is not intelligent.
Melody is not intelligent.
Solomon is frightened.
Odessa is not conscientious.
Philbert is intelligent.
Melody is not friendly.
Solomon is not conscientious.
Odessa is frightened.
Solomon is not embarrassed.
Melody is not impossible.
Melody is conscientious.
Stefan is not embarrassed.Someone who is eithor intelligent or frightened is always embarrassed.
Melody is conscientious if and only if Philbert is not embarrassed and Melody is intelligent.
If Philbert is not friendly, then Tyler is not intelligent.
If someone is both friendly and not embarrassed, then he is not frightened.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Melody is not conscientious.
Someone being not friendly is equivalent to being conscientious.
Stefan being embarrassed implies that Solomon is frightened and Tyler is not friendly.
If Philbert is not conscientious or Tyler is impossible, then Melody is not embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Tyler is not impossible and Helena is friendly once knowing that Stefan is embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Stefan is impossible once knowing that Stefan is not friendly or Helena is conscientious.
Someone is not embarrassed and not impossible if and only if he is not friendly and frightened.
If there is nobody who is not friendly, then Solomon is conscientious. | Stefan is not intelligent. | entailment |
Stefan is not intelligent.
Melody is not intelligent.
Solomon is frightened.
Odessa is not conscientious.
Philbert is intelligent.
Melody is not friendly.
Solomon is not conscientious.
Odessa is frightened.
Solomon is not embarrassed.
Melody is not impossible.
Melody is conscientious.
Stefan is not embarrassed.Someone who is eithor intelligent or frightened is always embarrassed.
Melody is conscientious if and only if Philbert is not embarrassed and Melody is intelligent.
If Philbert is not friendly, then Tyler is not intelligent.
If someone is both friendly and not embarrassed, then he is not frightened.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Melody is not conscientious.
Someone being not friendly is equivalent to being conscientious.
Stefan being embarrassed implies that Solomon is frightened and Tyler is not friendly.
If Philbert is not conscientious or Tyler is impossible, then Melody is not embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Tyler is not impossible and Helena is friendly once knowing that Stefan is embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Stefan is impossible once knowing that Stefan is not friendly or Helena is conscientious.
Someone is not embarrassed and not impossible if and only if he is not friendly and frightened.
If there is nobody who is not friendly, then Solomon is conscientious. | Helena is intelligent. | neutral |
Stefan is not intelligent.
Melody is not intelligent.
Solomon is frightened.
Odessa is not conscientious.
Philbert is intelligent.
Melody is not friendly.
Solomon is not conscientious.
Odessa is frightened.
Solomon is not embarrassed.
Melody is not impossible.
Melody is conscientious.
Stefan is not embarrassed.Someone who is eithor intelligent or frightened is always embarrassed.
Melody is conscientious if and only if Philbert is not embarrassed and Melody is intelligent.
If Philbert is not friendly, then Tyler is not intelligent.
If someone is both friendly and not embarrassed, then he is not frightened.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Melody is not conscientious.
Someone being not friendly is equivalent to being conscientious.
Stefan being embarrassed implies that Solomon is frightened and Tyler is not friendly.
If Philbert is not conscientious or Tyler is impossible, then Melody is not embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Tyler is not impossible and Helena is friendly once knowing that Stefan is embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Stefan is impossible once knowing that Stefan is not friendly or Helena is conscientious.
Someone is not embarrassed and not impossible if and only if he is not friendly and frightened.
If there is nobody who is not friendly, then Solomon is conscientious. | Philbert is embarrassed. | self_contradiction |
Humphrey is lively.
Robert is light.
Humphrey is light.
Charles is every.
Lucia is not massive.
Buck is not light.
Robert is traditional.
Humphrey is not motionless.
Robert is not every.
Charles is not motionless.
Charles is massive.
Humphrey is not traditional.If there is at least one people who is traditional, then Robert is not light and Buck is lively.
If someone is either traditional or not massive, then he is not light and not lively.
If Buck is traditional, then Charles is not motionless and Charles is every, and vice versa.
If Humphrey is not every, then Charles is light and Lars is not traditional, and vice versa.
If Buck is not light or Lucia is not every, then Arlen is not traditional.
If there is someone who is both motionless and not light, then Lucia is not traditional.
If Lucia is traditional, then Robert is every and Lars is massive.
It can be concluded that Lars is not lively and Robert is light once knowing that Lucia is massive.
Lars being not motionless is equivalent to Charles being light.
Someone being both every and not traditional is equivalent to being not massive and light.
Someone who is eithor massive or not traditional is always not every.
If there is at least one people who is motionless, then Arlen is every. | Robert is light. | self_contradiction |
Humphrey is lively.
Robert is light.
Humphrey is light.
Charles is every.
Lucia is not massive.
Buck is not light.
Robert is traditional.
Humphrey is not motionless.
Robert is not every.
Charles is not motionless.
Charles is massive.
Humphrey is not traditional.If there is at least one people who is traditional, then Robert is not light and Buck is lively.
If someone is either traditional or not massive, then he is not light and not lively.
If Buck is traditional, then Charles is not motionless and Charles is every, and vice versa.
If Humphrey is not every, then Charles is light and Lars is not traditional, and vice versa.
If Buck is not light or Lucia is not every, then Arlen is not traditional.
If there is someone who is both motionless and not light, then Lucia is not traditional.
If Lucia is traditional, then Robert is every and Lars is massive.
It can be concluded that Lars is not lively and Robert is light once knowing that Lucia is massive.
Lars being not motionless is equivalent to Charles being light.
Someone being both every and not traditional is equivalent to being not massive and light.
Someone who is eithor massive or not traditional is always not every.
If there is at least one people who is motionless, then Arlen is every. | Charles is light. | entailment |
Humphrey is lively.
Robert is light.
Humphrey is light.
Charles is every.
Lucia is not massive.
Buck is not light.
Robert is traditional.
Humphrey is not motionless.
Robert is not every.
Charles is not motionless.
Charles is massive.
Humphrey is not traditional.If there is at least one people who is traditional, then Robert is not light and Buck is lively.
If someone is either traditional or not massive, then he is not light and not lively.
If Buck is traditional, then Charles is not motionless and Charles is every, and vice versa.
If Humphrey is not every, then Charles is light and Lars is not traditional, and vice versa.
If Buck is not light or Lucia is not every, then Arlen is not traditional.
If there is someone who is both motionless and not light, then Lucia is not traditional.
If Lucia is traditional, then Robert is every and Lars is massive.
It can be concluded that Lars is not lively and Robert is light once knowing that Lucia is massive.
Lars being not motionless is equivalent to Charles being light.
Someone being both every and not traditional is equivalent to being not massive and light.
Someone who is eithor massive or not traditional is always not every.
If there is at least one people who is motionless, then Arlen is every. | Charles is every. | self_contradiction |
Humphrey is lively.
Robert is light.
Humphrey is light.
Charles is every.
Lucia is not massive.
Buck is not light.
Robert is traditional.
Humphrey is not motionless.
Robert is not every.
Charles is not motionless.
Charles is massive.
Humphrey is not traditional.If there is at least one people who is traditional, then Robert is not light and Buck is lively.
If someone is either traditional or not massive, then he is not light and not lively.
If Buck is traditional, then Charles is not motionless and Charles is every, and vice versa.
If Humphrey is not every, then Charles is light and Lars is not traditional, and vice versa.
If Buck is not light or Lucia is not every, then Arlen is not traditional.
If there is someone who is both motionless and not light, then Lucia is not traditional.
If Lucia is traditional, then Robert is every and Lars is massive.
It can be concluded that Lars is not lively and Robert is light once knowing that Lucia is massive.
Lars being not motionless is equivalent to Charles being light.
Someone being both every and not traditional is equivalent to being not massive and light.
Someone who is eithor massive or not traditional is always not every.
If there is at least one people who is motionless, then Arlen is every. | Lucia is motionless. | neutral |
Humphrey is lively.
Robert is light.
Humphrey is light.
Charles is every.
Lucia is not massive.
Buck is not light.
Robert is traditional.
Humphrey is not motionless.
Robert is not every.
Charles is not motionless.
Charles is massive.
Humphrey is not traditional.If there is at least one people who is traditional, then Robert is not light and Buck is lively.
If someone is either traditional or not massive, then he is not light and not lively.
If Buck is traditional, then Charles is not motionless and Charles is every, and vice versa.
If Humphrey is not every, then Charles is light and Lars is not traditional, and vice versa.
If Buck is not light or Lucia is not every, then Arlen is not traditional.
If there is someone who is both motionless and not light, then Lucia is not traditional.
If Lucia is traditional, then Robert is every and Lars is massive.
It can be concluded that Lars is not lively and Robert is light once knowing that Lucia is massive.
Lars being not motionless is equivalent to Charles being light.
Someone being both every and not traditional is equivalent to being not massive and light.
Someone who is eithor massive or not traditional is always not every.
If there is at least one people who is motionless, then Arlen is every. | Humphrey is motionless. | contradiction |
Humphrey is lively.
Robert is light.
Humphrey is light.
Charles is every.
Lucia is not massive.
Buck is not light.
Robert is traditional.
Humphrey is not motionless.
Robert is not every.
Charles is not motionless.
Charles is massive.
Humphrey is not traditional.If there is at least one people who is traditional, then Robert is not light and Buck is lively.
If someone is either traditional or not massive, then he is not light and not lively.
If Buck is traditional, then Charles is not motionless and Charles is every, and vice versa.
If Humphrey is not every, then Charles is light and Lars is not traditional, and vice versa.
If Buck is not light or Lucia is not every, then Arlen is not traditional.
If there is someone who is both motionless and not light, then Lucia is not traditional.
If Lucia is traditional, then Robert is every and Lars is massive.
It can be concluded that Lars is not lively and Robert is light once knowing that Lucia is massive.
Lars being not motionless is equivalent to Charles being light.
Someone being both every and not traditional is equivalent to being not massive and light.
Someone who is eithor massive or not traditional is always not every.
If there is at least one people who is motionless, then Arlen is every. | Charles is not motionless. | entailment |
Humphrey is lively.
Robert is light.
Humphrey is light.
Charles is every.
Lucia is not massive.
Buck is not light.
Robert is traditional.
Humphrey is not motionless.
Robert is not every.
Charles is not motionless.
Charles is massive.
Humphrey is not traditional.If there is at least one people who is traditional, then Robert is not light and Buck is lively.
If someone is either traditional or not massive, then he is not light and not lively.
If Buck is traditional, then Charles is not motionless and Charles is every, and vice versa.
If Humphrey is not every, then Charles is light and Lars is not traditional, and vice versa.
If Buck is not light or Lucia is not every, then Arlen is not traditional.
If there is someone who is both motionless and not light, then Lucia is not traditional.
If Lucia is traditional, then Robert is every and Lars is massive.
It can be concluded that Lars is not lively and Robert is light once knowing that Lucia is massive.
Lars being not motionless is equivalent to Charles being light.
Someone being both every and not traditional is equivalent to being not massive and light.
Someone who is eithor massive or not traditional is always not every.
If there is at least one people who is motionless, then Arlen is every. | Lucia is not every. | neutral |
Humphrey is lively.
Robert is light.
Humphrey is light.
Charles is every.
Lucia is not massive.
Buck is not light.
Robert is traditional.
Humphrey is not motionless.
Robert is not every.
Charles is not motionless.
Charles is massive.
Humphrey is not traditional.If there is at least one people who is traditional, then Robert is not light and Buck is lively.
If someone is either traditional or not massive, then he is not light and not lively.
If Buck is traditional, then Charles is not motionless and Charles is every, and vice versa.
If Humphrey is not every, then Charles is light and Lars is not traditional, and vice versa.
If Buck is not light or Lucia is not every, then Arlen is not traditional.
If there is someone who is both motionless and not light, then Lucia is not traditional.
If Lucia is traditional, then Robert is every and Lars is massive.
It can be concluded that Lars is not lively and Robert is light once knowing that Lucia is massive.
Lars being not motionless is equivalent to Charles being light.
Someone being both every and not traditional is equivalent to being not massive and light.
Someone who is eithor massive or not traditional is always not every.
If there is at least one people who is motionless, then Arlen is every. | Arlen is every. | contradiction |
Humphrey is lively.
Robert is light.
Humphrey is light.
Charles is every.
Lucia is not massive.
Buck is not light.
Robert is traditional.
Humphrey is not motionless.
Robert is not every.
Charles is not motionless.
Charles is massive.
Humphrey is not traditional.If there is at least one people who is traditional, then Robert is not light and Buck is lively.
If someone is either traditional or not massive, then he is not light and not lively.
If Buck is traditional, then Charles is not motionless and Charles is every, and vice versa.
If Humphrey is not every, then Charles is light and Lars is not traditional, and vice versa.
If Buck is not light or Lucia is not every, then Arlen is not traditional.
If there is someone who is both motionless and not light, then Lucia is not traditional.
If Lucia is traditional, then Robert is every and Lars is massive.
It can be concluded that Lars is not lively and Robert is light once knowing that Lucia is massive.
Lars being not motionless is equivalent to Charles being light.
Someone being both every and not traditional is equivalent to being not massive and light.
Someone who is eithor massive or not traditional is always not every.
If there is at least one people who is motionless, then Arlen is every. | Robert is traditional. | entailment |
Humphrey is lively.
Robert is light.
Humphrey is light.
Charles is every.
Lucia is not massive.
Buck is not light.
Robert is traditional.
Humphrey is not motionless.
Robert is not every.
Charles is not motionless.
Charles is massive.
Humphrey is not traditional.If there is at least one people who is traditional, then Robert is not light and Buck is lively.
If someone is either traditional or not massive, then he is not light and not lively.
If Buck is traditional, then Charles is not motionless and Charles is every, and vice versa.
If Humphrey is not every, then Charles is light and Lars is not traditional, and vice versa.
If Buck is not light or Lucia is not every, then Arlen is not traditional.
If there is someone who is both motionless and not light, then Lucia is not traditional.
If Lucia is traditional, then Robert is every and Lars is massive.
It can be concluded that Lars is not lively and Robert is light once knowing that Lucia is massive.
Lars being not motionless is equivalent to Charles being light.
Someone being both every and not traditional is equivalent to being not massive and light.
Someone who is eithor massive or not traditional is always not every.
If there is at least one people who is motionless, then Arlen is every. | Charles is not every. | self_contradiction |
Humphrey is lively.
Robert is light.
Humphrey is light.
Charles is every.
Lucia is not massive.
Buck is not light.
Robert is traditional.
Humphrey is not motionless.
Robert is not every.
Charles is not motionless.
Charles is massive.
Humphrey is not traditional.If there is at least one people who is traditional, then Robert is not light and Buck is lively.
If someone is either traditional or not massive, then he is not light and not lively.
If Buck is traditional, then Charles is not motionless and Charles is every, and vice versa.
If Humphrey is not every, then Charles is light and Lars is not traditional, and vice versa.
If Buck is not light or Lucia is not every, then Arlen is not traditional.
If there is someone who is both motionless and not light, then Lucia is not traditional.
If Lucia is traditional, then Robert is every and Lars is massive.
It can be concluded that Lars is not lively and Robert is light once knowing that Lucia is massive.
Lars being not motionless is equivalent to Charles being light.
Someone being both every and not traditional is equivalent to being not massive and light.
Someone who is eithor massive or not traditional is always not every.
If there is at least one people who is motionless, then Arlen is every. | Buck is not every. | neutral |
Humphrey is lively.
Robert is light.
Humphrey is light.
Charles is every.
Lucia is not massive.
Buck is not light.
Robert is traditional.
Humphrey is not motionless.
Robert is not every.
Charles is not motionless.
Charles is massive.
Humphrey is not traditional.If there is at least one people who is traditional, then Robert is not light and Buck is lively.
If someone is either traditional or not massive, then he is not light and not lively.
If Buck is traditional, then Charles is not motionless and Charles is every, and vice versa.
If Humphrey is not every, then Charles is light and Lars is not traditional, and vice versa.
If Buck is not light or Lucia is not every, then Arlen is not traditional.
If there is someone who is both motionless and not light, then Lucia is not traditional.
If Lucia is traditional, then Robert is every and Lars is massive.
It can be concluded that Lars is not lively and Robert is light once knowing that Lucia is massive.
Lars being not motionless is equivalent to Charles being light.
Someone being both every and not traditional is equivalent to being not massive and light.
Someone who is eithor massive or not traditional is always not every.
If there is at least one people who is motionless, then Arlen is every. | Arlen is light. | neutral |
Humphrey is lively.
Robert is light.
Humphrey is light.
Charles is every.
Lucia is not massive.
Buck is not light.
Robert is traditional.
Humphrey is not motionless.
Robert is not every.
Charles is not motionless.
Charles is massive.
Humphrey is not traditional.If there is at least one people who is traditional, then Robert is not light and Buck is lively.
If someone is either traditional or not massive, then he is not light and not lively.
If Buck is traditional, then Charles is not motionless and Charles is every, and vice versa.
If Humphrey is not every, then Charles is light and Lars is not traditional, and vice versa.
If Buck is not light or Lucia is not every, then Arlen is not traditional.
If there is someone who is both motionless and not light, then Lucia is not traditional.
If Lucia is traditional, then Robert is every and Lars is massive.
It can be concluded that Lars is not lively and Robert is light once knowing that Lucia is massive.
Lars being not motionless is equivalent to Charles being light.
Someone being both every and not traditional is equivalent to being not massive and light.
Someone who is eithor massive or not traditional is always not every.
If there is at least one people who is motionless, then Arlen is every. | Lucia is light. | contradiction |
Humphrey is lively.
Robert is light.
Humphrey is light.
Charles is every.
Lucia is not massive.
Buck is not light.
Robert is traditional.
Humphrey is not motionless.
Robert is not every.
Charles is not motionless.
Charles is massive.
Humphrey is not traditional.If there is at least one people who is traditional, then Robert is not light and Buck is lively.
If someone is either traditional or not massive, then he is not light and not lively.
If Buck is traditional, then Charles is not motionless and Charles is every, and vice versa.
If Humphrey is not every, then Charles is light and Lars is not traditional, and vice versa.
If Buck is not light or Lucia is not every, then Arlen is not traditional.
If there is someone who is both motionless and not light, then Lucia is not traditional.
If Lucia is traditional, then Robert is every and Lars is massive.
It can be concluded that Lars is not lively and Robert is light once knowing that Lucia is massive.
Lars being not motionless is equivalent to Charles being light.
Someone being both every and not traditional is equivalent to being not massive and light.
Someone who is eithor massive or not traditional is always not every.
If there is at least one people who is motionless, then Arlen is every. | Buck is lively. | self_contradiction |
Humphrey is lively.
Robert is light.
Humphrey is light.
Charles is every.
Lucia is not massive.
Buck is not light.
Robert is traditional.
Humphrey is not motionless.
Robert is not every.
Charles is not motionless.
Charles is massive.
Humphrey is not traditional.If there is at least one people who is traditional, then Robert is not light and Buck is lively.
If someone is either traditional or not massive, then he is not light and not lively.
If Buck is traditional, then Charles is not motionless and Charles is every, and vice versa.
If Humphrey is not every, then Charles is light and Lars is not traditional, and vice versa.
If Buck is not light or Lucia is not every, then Arlen is not traditional.
If there is someone who is both motionless and not light, then Lucia is not traditional.
If Lucia is traditional, then Robert is every and Lars is massive.
It can be concluded that Lars is not lively and Robert is light once knowing that Lucia is massive.
Lars being not motionless is equivalent to Charles being light.
Someone being both every and not traditional is equivalent to being not massive and light.
Someone who is eithor massive or not traditional is always not every.
If there is at least one people who is motionless, then Arlen is every. | Buck is light. | contradiction |
Humphrey is lively.
Robert is light.
Humphrey is light.
Charles is every.
Lucia is not massive.
Buck is not light.
Robert is traditional.
Humphrey is not motionless.
Robert is not every.
Charles is not motionless.
Charles is massive.
Humphrey is not traditional.If there is at least one people who is traditional, then Robert is not light and Buck is lively.
If someone is either traditional or not massive, then he is not light and not lively.
If Buck is traditional, then Charles is not motionless and Charles is every, and vice versa.
If Humphrey is not every, then Charles is light and Lars is not traditional, and vice versa.
If Buck is not light or Lucia is not every, then Arlen is not traditional.
If there is someone who is both motionless and not light, then Lucia is not traditional.
If Lucia is traditional, then Robert is every and Lars is massive.
It can be concluded that Lars is not lively and Robert is light once knowing that Lucia is massive.
Lars being not motionless is equivalent to Charles being light.
Someone being both every and not traditional is equivalent to being not massive and light.
Someone who is eithor massive or not traditional is always not every.
If there is at least one people who is motionless, then Arlen is every. | Buck is not light. | entailment |
Humphrey is lively.
Robert is light.
Humphrey is light.
Charles is every.
Lucia is not massive.
Buck is not light.
Robert is traditional.
Humphrey is not motionless.
Robert is not every.
Charles is not motionless.
Charles is massive.
Humphrey is not traditional.If there is at least one people who is traditional, then Robert is not light and Buck is lively.
If someone is either traditional or not massive, then he is not light and not lively.
If Buck is traditional, then Charles is not motionless and Charles is every, and vice versa.
If Humphrey is not every, then Charles is light and Lars is not traditional, and vice versa.
If Buck is not light or Lucia is not every, then Arlen is not traditional.
If there is someone who is both motionless and not light, then Lucia is not traditional.
If Lucia is traditional, then Robert is every and Lars is massive.
It can be concluded that Lars is not lively and Robert is light once knowing that Lucia is massive.
Lars being not motionless is equivalent to Charles being light.
Someone being both every and not traditional is equivalent to being not massive and light.
Someone who is eithor massive or not traditional is always not every.
If there is at least one people who is motionless, then Arlen is every. | Robert is not every. | entailment |
Humphrey is lively.
Robert is light.
Humphrey is light.
Charles is every.
Lucia is not massive.
Buck is not light.
Robert is traditional.
Humphrey is not motionless.
Robert is not every.
Charles is not motionless.
Charles is massive.
Humphrey is not traditional.If there is at least one people who is traditional, then Robert is not light and Buck is lively.
If someone is either traditional or not massive, then he is not light and not lively.
If Buck is traditional, then Charles is not motionless and Charles is every, and vice versa.
If Humphrey is not every, then Charles is light and Lars is not traditional, and vice versa.
If Buck is not light or Lucia is not every, then Arlen is not traditional.
If there is someone who is both motionless and not light, then Lucia is not traditional.
If Lucia is traditional, then Robert is every and Lars is massive.
It can be concluded that Lars is not lively and Robert is light once knowing that Lucia is massive.
Lars being not motionless is equivalent to Charles being light.
Someone being both every and not traditional is equivalent to being not massive and light.
Someone who is eithor massive or not traditional is always not every.
If there is at least one people who is motionless, then Arlen is every. | Buck is not lively. | self_contradiction |
Humphrey is lively.
Robert is light.
Humphrey is light.
Charles is every.
Lucia is not massive.
Buck is not light.
Robert is traditional.
Humphrey is not motionless.
Robert is not every.
Charles is not motionless.
Charles is massive.
Humphrey is not traditional.If there is at least one people who is traditional, then Robert is not light and Buck is lively.
If someone is either traditional or not massive, then he is not light and not lively.
If Buck is traditional, then Charles is not motionless and Charles is every, and vice versa.
If Humphrey is not every, then Charles is light and Lars is not traditional, and vice versa.
If Buck is not light or Lucia is not every, then Arlen is not traditional.
If there is someone who is both motionless and not light, then Lucia is not traditional.
If Lucia is traditional, then Robert is every and Lars is massive.
It can be concluded that Lars is not lively and Robert is light once knowing that Lucia is massive.
Lars being not motionless is equivalent to Charles being light.
Someone being both every and not traditional is equivalent to being not massive and light.
Someone who is eithor massive or not traditional is always not every.
If there is at least one people who is motionless, then Arlen is every. | Arlen is not light. | neutral |
Humphrey is lively.
Robert is light.
Humphrey is light.
Charles is every.
Lucia is not massive.
Buck is not light.
Robert is traditional.
Humphrey is not motionless.
Robert is not every.
Charles is not motionless.
Charles is massive.
Humphrey is not traditional.If there is at least one people who is traditional, then Robert is not light and Buck is lively.
If someone is either traditional or not massive, then he is not light and not lively.
If Buck is traditional, then Charles is not motionless and Charles is every, and vice versa.
If Humphrey is not every, then Charles is light and Lars is not traditional, and vice versa.
If Buck is not light or Lucia is not every, then Arlen is not traditional.
If there is someone who is both motionless and not light, then Lucia is not traditional.
If Lucia is traditional, then Robert is every and Lars is massive.
It can be concluded that Lars is not lively and Robert is light once knowing that Lucia is massive.
Lars being not motionless is equivalent to Charles being light.
Someone being both every and not traditional is equivalent to being not massive and light.
Someone who is eithor massive or not traditional is always not every.
If there is at least one people who is motionless, then Arlen is every. | Lars is traditional. | contradiction |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.