premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Angus is terrible.
Kelsey is aware.
Cedric is rare.
Angus is rare.
Corwin is terrible.
Cedric is terrible.
Miranda is legal.
Corwin is not rare.
Kelsey is rare.
Cedric is not aware.
Kelsey is not purple.
Angus is not legal.If there is someone who is not purple, then Miranda is terrible.
As long as someone is not aware, he is not rare and jealous.
Someone being rare is equivalent to being not jealous.
Someone is terrible and legal if and only if he is not jealous and not rare.
Someone who is eithor purple or not legal is always not jealous.
If someone is purple, then he is terrible.
If Miranda is legal or Angus is jealous, then Ives is not purple.
If Corwin is not aware, then Corwin is not terrible, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not rare and terrible, then Corwin is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is both not jealous and not terrible, then Corwin is legal.
Miranda being aware and Corwin being jealous imply that Kelsey is not terrible.
If there is someone who is either legal or not jealous, then Miranda is not terrible. | Angus is terrible. | entailment |
Angus is terrible.
Kelsey is aware.
Cedric is rare.
Angus is rare.
Corwin is terrible.
Cedric is terrible.
Miranda is legal.
Corwin is not rare.
Kelsey is rare.
Cedric is not aware.
Kelsey is not purple.
Angus is not legal.If there is someone who is not purple, then Miranda is terrible.
As long as someone is not aware, he is not rare and jealous.
Someone being rare is equivalent to being not jealous.
Someone is terrible and legal if and only if he is not jealous and not rare.
Someone who is eithor purple or not legal is always not jealous.
If someone is purple, then he is terrible.
If Miranda is legal or Angus is jealous, then Ives is not purple.
If Corwin is not aware, then Corwin is not terrible, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not rare and terrible, then Corwin is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is both not jealous and not terrible, then Corwin is legal.
Miranda being aware and Corwin being jealous imply that Kelsey is not terrible.
If there is someone who is either legal or not jealous, then Miranda is not terrible. | Angus is purple. | neutral |
Angus is terrible.
Kelsey is aware.
Cedric is rare.
Angus is rare.
Corwin is terrible.
Cedric is terrible.
Miranda is legal.
Corwin is not rare.
Kelsey is rare.
Cedric is not aware.
Kelsey is not purple.
Angus is not legal.If there is someone who is not purple, then Miranda is terrible.
As long as someone is not aware, he is not rare and jealous.
Someone being rare is equivalent to being not jealous.
Someone is terrible and legal if and only if he is not jealous and not rare.
Someone who is eithor purple or not legal is always not jealous.
If someone is purple, then he is terrible.
If Miranda is legal or Angus is jealous, then Ives is not purple.
If Corwin is not aware, then Corwin is not terrible, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not rare and terrible, then Corwin is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is both not jealous and not terrible, then Corwin is legal.
Miranda being aware and Corwin being jealous imply that Kelsey is not terrible.
If there is someone who is either legal or not jealous, then Miranda is not terrible. | Corwin is purple. | neutral |
Angus is terrible.
Kelsey is aware.
Cedric is rare.
Angus is rare.
Corwin is terrible.
Cedric is terrible.
Miranda is legal.
Corwin is not rare.
Kelsey is rare.
Cedric is not aware.
Kelsey is not purple.
Angus is not legal.If there is someone who is not purple, then Miranda is terrible.
As long as someone is not aware, he is not rare and jealous.
Someone being rare is equivalent to being not jealous.
Someone is terrible and legal if and only if he is not jealous and not rare.
Someone who is eithor purple or not legal is always not jealous.
If someone is purple, then he is terrible.
If Miranda is legal or Angus is jealous, then Ives is not purple.
If Corwin is not aware, then Corwin is not terrible, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not rare and terrible, then Corwin is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is both not jealous and not terrible, then Corwin is legal.
Miranda being aware and Corwin being jealous imply that Kelsey is not terrible.
If there is someone who is either legal or not jealous, then Miranda is not terrible. | Miranda is terrible. | self_contradiction |
Angus is terrible.
Kelsey is aware.
Cedric is rare.
Angus is rare.
Corwin is terrible.
Cedric is terrible.
Miranda is legal.
Corwin is not rare.
Kelsey is rare.
Cedric is not aware.
Kelsey is not purple.
Angus is not legal.If there is someone who is not purple, then Miranda is terrible.
As long as someone is not aware, he is not rare and jealous.
Someone being rare is equivalent to being not jealous.
Someone is terrible and legal if and only if he is not jealous and not rare.
Someone who is eithor purple or not legal is always not jealous.
If someone is purple, then he is terrible.
If Miranda is legal or Angus is jealous, then Ives is not purple.
If Corwin is not aware, then Corwin is not terrible, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not rare and terrible, then Corwin is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is both not jealous and not terrible, then Corwin is legal.
Miranda being aware and Corwin being jealous imply that Kelsey is not terrible.
If there is someone who is either legal or not jealous, then Miranda is not terrible. | Ives is purple. | contradiction |
Angus is terrible.
Kelsey is aware.
Cedric is rare.
Angus is rare.
Corwin is terrible.
Cedric is terrible.
Miranda is legal.
Corwin is not rare.
Kelsey is rare.
Cedric is not aware.
Kelsey is not purple.
Angus is not legal.If there is someone who is not purple, then Miranda is terrible.
As long as someone is not aware, he is not rare and jealous.
Someone being rare is equivalent to being not jealous.
Someone is terrible and legal if and only if he is not jealous and not rare.
Someone who is eithor purple or not legal is always not jealous.
If someone is purple, then he is terrible.
If Miranda is legal or Angus is jealous, then Ives is not purple.
If Corwin is not aware, then Corwin is not terrible, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not rare and terrible, then Corwin is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is both not jealous and not terrible, then Corwin is legal.
Miranda being aware and Corwin being jealous imply that Kelsey is not terrible.
If there is someone who is either legal or not jealous, then Miranda is not terrible. | Miranda is not jealous. | entailment |
Angus is terrible.
Kelsey is aware.
Cedric is rare.
Angus is rare.
Corwin is terrible.
Cedric is terrible.
Miranda is legal.
Corwin is not rare.
Kelsey is rare.
Cedric is not aware.
Kelsey is not purple.
Angus is not legal.If there is someone who is not purple, then Miranda is terrible.
As long as someone is not aware, he is not rare and jealous.
Someone being rare is equivalent to being not jealous.
Someone is terrible and legal if and only if he is not jealous and not rare.
Someone who is eithor purple or not legal is always not jealous.
If someone is purple, then he is terrible.
If Miranda is legal or Angus is jealous, then Ives is not purple.
If Corwin is not aware, then Corwin is not terrible, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not rare and terrible, then Corwin is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is both not jealous and not terrible, then Corwin is legal.
Miranda being aware and Corwin being jealous imply that Kelsey is not terrible.
If there is someone who is either legal or not jealous, then Miranda is not terrible. | Corwin is jealous. | contradiction |
Angus is terrible.
Kelsey is aware.
Cedric is rare.
Angus is rare.
Corwin is terrible.
Cedric is terrible.
Miranda is legal.
Corwin is not rare.
Kelsey is rare.
Cedric is not aware.
Kelsey is not purple.
Angus is not legal.If there is someone who is not purple, then Miranda is terrible.
As long as someone is not aware, he is not rare and jealous.
Someone being rare is equivalent to being not jealous.
Someone is terrible and legal if and only if he is not jealous and not rare.
Someone who is eithor purple or not legal is always not jealous.
If someone is purple, then he is terrible.
If Miranda is legal or Angus is jealous, then Ives is not purple.
If Corwin is not aware, then Corwin is not terrible, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not rare and terrible, then Corwin is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is both not jealous and not terrible, then Corwin is legal.
Miranda being aware and Corwin being jealous imply that Kelsey is not terrible.
If there is someone who is either legal or not jealous, then Miranda is not terrible. | Cedric is not aware. | entailment |
Angus is terrible.
Kelsey is aware.
Cedric is rare.
Angus is rare.
Corwin is terrible.
Cedric is terrible.
Miranda is legal.
Corwin is not rare.
Kelsey is rare.
Cedric is not aware.
Kelsey is not purple.
Angus is not legal.If there is someone who is not purple, then Miranda is terrible.
As long as someone is not aware, he is not rare and jealous.
Someone being rare is equivalent to being not jealous.
Someone is terrible and legal if and only if he is not jealous and not rare.
Someone who is eithor purple or not legal is always not jealous.
If someone is purple, then he is terrible.
If Miranda is legal or Angus is jealous, then Ives is not purple.
If Corwin is not aware, then Corwin is not terrible, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not rare and terrible, then Corwin is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is both not jealous and not terrible, then Corwin is legal.
Miranda being aware and Corwin being jealous imply that Kelsey is not terrible.
If there is someone who is either legal or not jealous, then Miranda is not terrible. | Corwin is terrible. | entailment |
Angus is terrible.
Kelsey is aware.
Cedric is rare.
Angus is rare.
Corwin is terrible.
Cedric is terrible.
Miranda is legal.
Corwin is not rare.
Kelsey is rare.
Cedric is not aware.
Kelsey is not purple.
Angus is not legal.If there is someone who is not purple, then Miranda is terrible.
As long as someone is not aware, he is not rare and jealous.
Someone being rare is equivalent to being not jealous.
Someone is terrible and legal if and only if he is not jealous and not rare.
Someone who is eithor purple or not legal is always not jealous.
If someone is purple, then he is terrible.
If Miranda is legal or Angus is jealous, then Ives is not purple.
If Corwin is not aware, then Corwin is not terrible, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not rare and terrible, then Corwin is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is both not jealous and not terrible, then Corwin is legal.
Miranda being aware and Corwin being jealous imply that Kelsey is not terrible.
If there is someone who is either legal or not jealous, then Miranda is not terrible. | Corwin is rare. | self_contradiction |
Angus is terrible.
Kelsey is aware.
Cedric is rare.
Angus is rare.
Corwin is terrible.
Cedric is terrible.
Miranda is legal.
Corwin is not rare.
Kelsey is rare.
Cedric is not aware.
Kelsey is not purple.
Angus is not legal.If there is someone who is not purple, then Miranda is terrible.
As long as someone is not aware, he is not rare and jealous.
Someone being rare is equivalent to being not jealous.
Someone is terrible and legal if and only if he is not jealous and not rare.
Someone who is eithor purple or not legal is always not jealous.
If someone is purple, then he is terrible.
If Miranda is legal or Angus is jealous, then Ives is not purple.
If Corwin is not aware, then Corwin is not terrible, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not rare and terrible, then Corwin is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is both not jealous and not terrible, then Corwin is legal.
Miranda being aware and Corwin being jealous imply that Kelsey is not terrible.
If there is someone who is either legal or not jealous, then Miranda is not terrible. | Cedric is rare. | self_contradiction |
Angus is terrible.
Kelsey is aware.
Cedric is rare.
Angus is rare.
Corwin is terrible.
Cedric is terrible.
Miranda is legal.
Corwin is not rare.
Kelsey is rare.
Cedric is not aware.
Kelsey is not purple.
Angus is not legal.If there is someone who is not purple, then Miranda is terrible.
As long as someone is not aware, he is not rare and jealous.
Someone being rare is equivalent to being not jealous.
Someone is terrible and legal if and only if he is not jealous and not rare.
Someone who is eithor purple or not legal is always not jealous.
If someone is purple, then he is terrible.
If Miranda is legal or Angus is jealous, then Ives is not purple.
If Corwin is not aware, then Corwin is not terrible, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not rare and terrible, then Corwin is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is both not jealous and not terrible, then Corwin is legal.
Miranda being aware and Corwin being jealous imply that Kelsey is not terrible.
If there is someone who is either legal or not jealous, then Miranda is not terrible. | Miranda is not terrible. | self_contradiction |
Angus is terrible.
Kelsey is aware.
Cedric is rare.
Angus is rare.
Corwin is terrible.
Cedric is terrible.
Miranda is legal.
Corwin is not rare.
Kelsey is rare.
Cedric is not aware.
Kelsey is not purple.
Angus is not legal.If there is someone who is not purple, then Miranda is terrible.
As long as someone is not aware, he is not rare and jealous.
Someone being rare is equivalent to being not jealous.
Someone is terrible and legal if and only if he is not jealous and not rare.
Someone who is eithor purple or not legal is always not jealous.
If someone is purple, then he is terrible.
If Miranda is legal or Angus is jealous, then Ives is not purple.
If Corwin is not aware, then Corwin is not terrible, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not rare and terrible, then Corwin is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is both not jealous and not terrible, then Corwin is legal.
Miranda being aware and Corwin being jealous imply that Kelsey is not terrible.
If there is someone who is either legal or not jealous, then Miranda is not terrible. | Kelsey is not aware. | contradiction |
Angus is terrible.
Kelsey is aware.
Cedric is rare.
Angus is rare.
Corwin is terrible.
Cedric is terrible.
Miranda is legal.
Corwin is not rare.
Kelsey is rare.
Cedric is not aware.
Kelsey is not purple.
Angus is not legal.If there is someone who is not purple, then Miranda is terrible.
As long as someone is not aware, he is not rare and jealous.
Someone being rare is equivalent to being not jealous.
Someone is terrible and legal if and only if he is not jealous and not rare.
Someone who is eithor purple or not legal is always not jealous.
If someone is purple, then he is terrible.
If Miranda is legal or Angus is jealous, then Ives is not purple.
If Corwin is not aware, then Corwin is not terrible, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not rare and terrible, then Corwin is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is both not jealous and not terrible, then Corwin is legal.
Miranda being aware and Corwin being jealous imply that Kelsey is not terrible.
If there is someone who is either legal or not jealous, then Miranda is not terrible. | Cedric is not jealous. | self_contradiction |
Angus is terrible.
Kelsey is aware.
Cedric is rare.
Angus is rare.
Corwin is terrible.
Cedric is terrible.
Miranda is legal.
Corwin is not rare.
Kelsey is rare.
Cedric is not aware.
Kelsey is not purple.
Angus is not legal.If there is someone who is not purple, then Miranda is terrible.
As long as someone is not aware, he is not rare and jealous.
Someone being rare is equivalent to being not jealous.
Someone is terrible and legal if and only if he is not jealous and not rare.
Someone who is eithor purple or not legal is always not jealous.
If someone is purple, then he is terrible.
If Miranda is legal or Angus is jealous, then Ives is not purple.
If Corwin is not aware, then Corwin is not terrible, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not rare and terrible, then Corwin is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is both not jealous and not terrible, then Corwin is legal.
Miranda being aware and Corwin being jealous imply that Kelsey is not terrible.
If there is someone who is either legal or not jealous, then Miranda is not terrible. | Kelsey is not legal. | neutral |
Angus is terrible.
Kelsey is aware.
Cedric is rare.
Angus is rare.
Corwin is terrible.
Cedric is terrible.
Miranda is legal.
Corwin is not rare.
Kelsey is rare.
Cedric is not aware.
Kelsey is not purple.
Angus is not legal.If there is someone who is not purple, then Miranda is terrible.
As long as someone is not aware, he is not rare and jealous.
Someone being rare is equivalent to being not jealous.
Someone is terrible and legal if and only if he is not jealous and not rare.
Someone who is eithor purple or not legal is always not jealous.
If someone is purple, then he is terrible.
If Miranda is legal or Angus is jealous, then Ives is not purple.
If Corwin is not aware, then Corwin is not terrible, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not rare and terrible, then Corwin is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is both not jealous and not terrible, then Corwin is legal.
Miranda being aware and Corwin being jealous imply that Kelsey is not terrible.
If there is someone who is either legal or not jealous, then Miranda is not terrible. | Corwin is not jealous. | entailment |
Angus is terrible.
Kelsey is aware.
Cedric is rare.
Angus is rare.
Corwin is terrible.
Cedric is terrible.
Miranda is legal.
Corwin is not rare.
Kelsey is rare.
Cedric is not aware.
Kelsey is not purple.
Angus is not legal.If there is someone who is not purple, then Miranda is terrible.
As long as someone is not aware, he is not rare and jealous.
Someone being rare is equivalent to being not jealous.
Someone is terrible and legal if and only if he is not jealous and not rare.
Someone who is eithor purple or not legal is always not jealous.
If someone is purple, then he is terrible.
If Miranda is legal or Angus is jealous, then Ives is not purple.
If Corwin is not aware, then Corwin is not terrible, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not rare and terrible, then Corwin is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is both not jealous and not terrible, then Corwin is legal.
Miranda being aware and Corwin being jealous imply that Kelsey is not terrible.
If there is someone who is either legal or not jealous, then Miranda is not terrible. | Miranda is not legal. | contradiction |
Angus is terrible.
Kelsey is aware.
Cedric is rare.
Angus is rare.
Corwin is terrible.
Cedric is terrible.
Miranda is legal.
Corwin is not rare.
Kelsey is rare.
Cedric is not aware.
Kelsey is not purple.
Angus is not legal.If there is someone who is not purple, then Miranda is terrible.
As long as someone is not aware, he is not rare and jealous.
Someone being rare is equivalent to being not jealous.
Someone is terrible and legal if and only if he is not jealous and not rare.
Someone who is eithor purple or not legal is always not jealous.
If someone is purple, then he is terrible.
If Miranda is legal or Angus is jealous, then Ives is not purple.
If Corwin is not aware, then Corwin is not terrible, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not rare and terrible, then Corwin is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is both not jealous and not terrible, then Corwin is legal.
Miranda being aware and Corwin being jealous imply that Kelsey is not terrible.
If there is someone who is either legal or not jealous, then Miranda is not terrible. | Kelsey is not rare. | contradiction |
Angus is terrible.
Kelsey is aware.
Cedric is rare.
Angus is rare.
Corwin is terrible.
Cedric is terrible.
Miranda is legal.
Corwin is not rare.
Kelsey is rare.
Cedric is not aware.
Kelsey is not purple.
Angus is not legal.If there is someone who is not purple, then Miranda is terrible.
As long as someone is not aware, he is not rare and jealous.
Someone being rare is equivalent to being not jealous.
Someone is terrible and legal if and only if he is not jealous and not rare.
Someone who is eithor purple or not legal is always not jealous.
If someone is purple, then he is terrible.
If Miranda is legal or Angus is jealous, then Ives is not purple.
If Corwin is not aware, then Corwin is not terrible, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not rare and terrible, then Corwin is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is both not jealous and not terrible, then Corwin is legal.
Miranda being aware and Corwin being jealous imply that Kelsey is not terrible.
If there is someone who is either legal or not jealous, then Miranda is not terrible. | Ives is not legal. | neutral |
Angus is terrible.
Kelsey is aware.
Cedric is rare.
Angus is rare.
Corwin is terrible.
Cedric is terrible.
Miranda is legal.
Corwin is not rare.
Kelsey is rare.
Cedric is not aware.
Kelsey is not purple.
Angus is not legal.If there is someone who is not purple, then Miranda is terrible.
As long as someone is not aware, he is not rare and jealous.
Someone being rare is equivalent to being not jealous.
Someone is terrible and legal if and only if he is not jealous and not rare.
Someone who is eithor purple or not legal is always not jealous.
If someone is purple, then he is terrible.
If Miranda is legal or Angus is jealous, then Ives is not purple.
If Corwin is not aware, then Corwin is not terrible, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not rare and terrible, then Corwin is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is both not jealous and not terrible, then Corwin is legal.
Miranda being aware and Corwin being jealous imply that Kelsey is not terrible.
If there is someone who is either legal or not jealous, then Miranda is not terrible. | Lucia is rare. | neutral |
Shamus is environmental.
Alastair is not similar.
Austin is similar.
Shamus is not obedient.
Greyson is obedient.
Marlon is not environmental.
Marlon is not tart.
Alastair is obedient.
Alastair is not dishonest.
Marlon is dishonest.
Tyler is unfair.
Greyson is not environmental.If there is someone who is tart, then Shamus is dishonest and Alastair is obedient.
Tyler being not unfair and Greyson being not tart imply that Aiken is obedient.
Someone is environmental and tart if and only if he is obedient.
It can be concluded that Alastair is environmental once knowing that Tyler is not obedient or Greyson is not unfair.
As long as someone is dishonest, he is not similar and not obedient.
If Shamus is dishonest and Greyson is similar, then Tyler is environmental.
Someone who is not unfair is always both not tart and not similar.
If all people are not dishonest, then Shamus is not unfair and Alastair is not tart.
If someone is both dishonest and not similar, then he is environmental.
Someone who is unfair is always both not environmental and not similar.
If Marlon is not environmental, then Marlon is similar.
If there is at least one people who is unfair, then Greyson is dishonest. | Aiken is tart. | neutral |
Shamus is environmental.
Alastair is not similar.
Austin is similar.
Shamus is not obedient.
Greyson is obedient.
Marlon is not environmental.
Marlon is not tart.
Alastair is obedient.
Alastair is not dishonest.
Marlon is dishonest.
Tyler is unfair.
Greyson is not environmental.If there is someone who is tart, then Shamus is dishonest and Alastair is obedient.
Tyler being not unfair and Greyson being not tart imply that Aiken is obedient.
Someone is environmental and tart if and only if he is obedient.
It can be concluded that Alastair is environmental once knowing that Tyler is not obedient or Greyson is not unfair.
As long as someone is dishonest, he is not similar and not obedient.
If Shamus is dishonest and Greyson is similar, then Tyler is environmental.
Someone who is not unfair is always both not tart and not similar.
If all people are not dishonest, then Shamus is not unfair and Alastair is not tart.
If someone is both dishonest and not similar, then he is environmental.
Someone who is unfair is always both not environmental and not similar.
If Marlon is not environmental, then Marlon is similar.
If there is at least one people who is unfair, then Greyson is dishonest. | Austin is not similar. | contradiction |
Shamus is environmental.
Alastair is not similar.
Austin is similar.
Shamus is not obedient.
Greyson is obedient.
Marlon is not environmental.
Marlon is not tart.
Alastair is obedient.
Alastair is not dishonest.
Marlon is dishonest.
Tyler is unfair.
Greyson is not environmental.If there is someone who is tart, then Shamus is dishonest and Alastair is obedient.
Tyler being not unfair and Greyson being not tart imply that Aiken is obedient.
Someone is environmental and tart if and only if he is obedient.
It can be concluded that Alastair is environmental once knowing that Tyler is not obedient or Greyson is not unfair.
As long as someone is dishonest, he is not similar and not obedient.
If Shamus is dishonest and Greyson is similar, then Tyler is environmental.
Someone who is not unfair is always both not tart and not similar.
If all people are not dishonest, then Shamus is not unfair and Alastair is not tart.
If someone is both dishonest and not similar, then he is environmental.
Someone who is unfair is always both not environmental and not similar.
If Marlon is not environmental, then Marlon is similar.
If there is at least one people who is unfair, then Greyson is dishonest. | Alastair is dishonest. | contradiction |
Shamus is environmental.
Alastair is not similar.
Austin is similar.
Shamus is not obedient.
Greyson is obedient.
Marlon is not environmental.
Marlon is not tart.
Alastair is obedient.
Alastair is not dishonest.
Marlon is dishonest.
Tyler is unfair.
Greyson is not environmental.If there is someone who is tart, then Shamus is dishonest and Alastair is obedient.
Tyler being not unfair and Greyson being not tart imply that Aiken is obedient.
Someone is environmental and tart if and only if he is obedient.
It can be concluded that Alastair is environmental once knowing that Tyler is not obedient or Greyson is not unfair.
As long as someone is dishonest, he is not similar and not obedient.
If Shamus is dishonest and Greyson is similar, then Tyler is environmental.
Someone who is not unfair is always both not tart and not similar.
If all people are not dishonest, then Shamus is not unfair and Alastair is not tart.
If someone is both dishonest and not similar, then he is environmental.
Someone who is unfair is always both not environmental and not similar.
If Marlon is not environmental, then Marlon is similar.
If there is at least one people who is unfair, then Greyson is dishonest. | Alastair is obedient. | entailment |
Shamus is environmental.
Alastair is not similar.
Austin is similar.
Shamus is not obedient.
Greyson is obedient.
Marlon is not environmental.
Marlon is not tart.
Alastair is obedient.
Alastair is not dishonest.
Marlon is dishonest.
Tyler is unfair.
Greyson is not environmental.If there is someone who is tart, then Shamus is dishonest and Alastair is obedient.
Tyler being not unfair and Greyson being not tart imply that Aiken is obedient.
Someone is environmental and tart if and only if he is obedient.
It can be concluded that Alastair is environmental once knowing that Tyler is not obedient or Greyson is not unfair.
As long as someone is dishonest, he is not similar and not obedient.
If Shamus is dishonest and Greyson is similar, then Tyler is environmental.
Someone who is not unfair is always both not tart and not similar.
If all people are not dishonest, then Shamus is not unfair and Alastair is not tart.
If someone is both dishonest and not similar, then he is environmental.
Someone who is unfair is always both not environmental and not similar.
If Marlon is not environmental, then Marlon is similar.
If there is at least one people who is unfair, then Greyson is dishonest. | Tyler is not dishonest. | neutral |
Shamus is environmental.
Alastair is not similar.
Austin is similar.
Shamus is not obedient.
Greyson is obedient.
Marlon is not environmental.
Marlon is not tart.
Alastair is obedient.
Alastair is not dishonest.
Marlon is dishonest.
Tyler is unfair.
Greyson is not environmental.If there is someone who is tart, then Shamus is dishonest and Alastair is obedient.
Tyler being not unfair and Greyson being not tart imply that Aiken is obedient.
Someone is environmental and tart if and only if he is obedient.
It can be concluded that Alastair is environmental once knowing that Tyler is not obedient or Greyson is not unfair.
As long as someone is dishonest, he is not similar and not obedient.
If Shamus is dishonest and Greyson is similar, then Tyler is environmental.
Someone who is not unfair is always both not tart and not similar.
If all people are not dishonest, then Shamus is not unfair and Alastair is not tart.
If someone is both dishonest and not similar, then he is environmental.
Someone who is unfair is always both not environmental and not similar.
If Marlon is not environmental, then Marlon is similar.
If there is at least one people who is unfair, then Greyson is dishonest. | Marlon is environmental. | self_contradiction |
Shamus is environmental.
Alastair is not similar.
Austin is similar.
Shamus is not obedient.
Greyson is obedient.
Marlon is not environmental.
Marlon is not tart.
Alastair is obedient.
Alastair is not dishonest.
Marlon is dishonest.
Tyler is unfair.
Greyson is not environmental.If there is someone who is tart, then Shamus is dishonest and Alastair is obedient.
Tyler being not unfair and Greyson being not tart imply that Aiken is obedient.
Someone is environmental and tart if and only if he is obedient.
It can be concluded that Alastair is environmental once knowing that Tyler is not obedient or Greyson is not unfair.
As long as someone is dishonest, he is not similar and not obedient.
If Shamus is dishonest and Greyson is similar, then Tyler is environmental.
Someone who is not unfair is always both not tart and not similar.
If all people are not dishonest, then Shamus is not unfair and Alastair is not tart.
If someone is both dishonest and not similar, then he is environmental.
Someone who is unfair is always both not environmental and not similar.
If Marlon is not environmental, then Marlon is similar.
If there is at least one people who is unfair, then Greyson is dishonest. | Tyler is environmental. | contradiction |
Shamus is environmental.
Alastair is not similar.
Austin is similar.
Shamus is not obedient.
Greyson is obedient.
Marlon is not environmental.
Marlon is not tart.
Alastair is obedient.
Alastair is not dishonest.
Marlon is dishonest.
Tyler is unfair.
Greyson is not environmental.If there is someone who is tart, then Shamus is dishonest and Alastair is obedient.
Tyler being not unfair and Greyson being not tart imply that Aiken is obedient.
Someone is environmental and tart if and only if he is obedient.
It can be concluded that Alastair is environmental once knowing that Tyler is not obedient or Greyson is not unfair.
As long as someone is dishonest, he is not similar and not obedient.
If Shamus is dishonest and Greyson is similar, then Tyler is environmental.
Someone who is not unfair is always both not tart and not similar.
If all people are not dishonest, then Shamus is not unfair and Alastair is not tart.
If someone is both dishonest and not similar, then he is environmental.
Someone who is unfair is always both not environmental and not similar.
If Marlon is not environmental, then Marlon is similar.
If there is at least one people who is unfair, then Greyson is dishonest. | Marlon is dishonest. | entailment |
Shamus is environmental.
Alastair is not similar.
Austin is similar.
Shamus is not obedient.
Greyson is obedient.
Marlon is not environmental.
Marlon is not tart.
Alastair is obedient.
Alastair is not dishonest.
Marlon is dishonest.
Tyler is unfair.
Greyson is not environmental.If there is someone who is tart, then Shamus is dishonest and Alastair is obedient.
Tyler being not unfair and Greyson being not tart imply that Aiken is obedient.
Someone is environmental and tart if and only if he is obedient.
It can be concluded that Alastair is environmental once knowing that Tyler is not obedient or Greyson is not unfair.
As long as someone is dishonest, he is not similar and not obedient.
If Shamus is dishonest and Greyson is similar, then Tyler is environmental.
Someone who is not unfair is always both not tart and not similar.
If all people are not dishonest, then Shamus is not unfair and Alastair is not tart.
If someone is both dishonest and not similar, then he is environmental.
Someone who is unfair is always both not environmental and not similar.
If Marlon is not environmental, then Marlon is similar.
If there is at least one people who is unfair, then Greyson is dishonest. | Greyson is not obedient. | self_contradiction |
Shamus is environmental.
Alastair is not similar.
Austin is similar.
Shamus is not obedient.
Greyson is obedient.
Marlon is not environmental.
Marlon is not tart.
Alastair is obedient.
Alastair is not dishonest.
Marlon is dishonest.
Tyler is unfair.
Greyson is not environmental.If there is someone who is tart, then Shamus is dishonest and Alastair is obedient.
Tyler being not unfair and Greyson being not tart imply that Aiken is obedient.
Someone is environmental and tart if and only if he is obedient.
It can be concluded that Alastair is environmental once knowing that Tyler is not obedient or Greyson is not unfair.
As long as someone is dishonest, he is not similar and not obedient.
If Shamus is dishonest and Greyson is similar, then Tyler is environmental.
Someone who is not unfair is always both not tart and not similar.
If all people are not dishonest, then Shamus is not unfair and Alastair is not tart.
If someone is both dishonest and not similar, then he is environmental.
Someone who is unfair is always both not environmental and not similar.
If Marlon is not environmental, then Marlon is similar.
If there is at least one people who is unfair, then Greyson is dishonest. | Marlon is not similar. | self_contradiction |
Shamus is environmental.
Alastair is not similar.
Austin is similar.
Shamus is not obedient.
Greyson is obedient.
Marlon is not environmental.
Marlon is not tart.
Alastair is obedient.
Alastair is not dishonest.
Marlon is dishonest.
Tyler is unfair.
Greyson is not environmental.If there is someone who is tart, then Shamus is dishonest and Alastair is obedient.
Tyler being not unfair and Greyson being not tart imply that Aiken is obedient.
Someone is environmental and tart if and only if he is obedient.
It can be concluded that Alastair is environmental once knowing that Tyler is not obedient or Greyson is not unfair.
As long as someone is dishonest, he is not similar and not obedient.
If Shamus is dishonest and Greyson is similar, then Tyler is environmental.
Someone who is not unfair is always both not tart and not similar.
If all people are not dishonest, then Shamus is not unfair and Alastair is not tart.
If someone is both dishonest and not similar, then he is environmental.
Someone who is unfair is always both not environmental and not similar.
If Marlon is not environmental, then Marlon is similar.
If there is at least one people who is unfair, then Greyson is dishonest. | Alastair is environmental. | entailment |
Shamus is environmental.
Alastair is not similar.
Austin is similar.
Shamus is not obedient.
Greyson is obedient.
Marlon is not environmental.
Marlon is not tart.
Alastair is obedient.
Alastair is not dishonest.
Marlon is dishonest.
Tyler is unfair.
Greyson is not environmental.If there is someone who is tart, then Shamus is dishonest and Alastair is obedient.
Tyler being not unfair and Greyson being not tart imply that Aiken is obedient.
Someone is environmental and tart if and only if he is obedient.
It can be concluded that Alastair is environmental once knowing that Tyler is not obedient or Greyson is not unfair.
As long as someone is dishonest, he is not similar and not obedient.
If Shamus is dishonest and Greyson is similar, then Tyler is environmental.
Someone who is not unfair is always both not tart and not similar.
If all people are not dishonest, then Shamus is not unfair and Alastair is not tart.
If someone is both dishonest and not similar, then he is environmental.
Someone who is unfair is always both not environmental and not similar.
If Marlon is not environmental, then Marlon is similar.
If there is at least one people who is unfair, then Greyson is dishonest. | Marlon is not tart. | entailment |
Shamus is environmental.
Alastair is not similar.
Austin is similar.
Shamus is not obedient.
Greyson is obedient.
Marlon is not environmental.
Marlon is not tart.
Alastair is obedient.
Alastair is not dishonest.
Marlon is dishonest.
Tyler is unfair.
Greyson is not environmental.If there is someone who is tart, then Shamus is dishonest and Alastair is obedient.
Tyler being not unfair and Greyson being not tart imply that Aiken is obedient.
Someone is environmental and tart if and only if he is obedient.
It can be concluded that Alastair is environmental once knowing that Tyler is not obedient or Greyson is not unfair.
As long as someone is dishonest, he is not similar and not obedient.
If Shamus is dishonest and Greyson is similar, then Tyler is environmental.
Someone who is not unfair is always both not tart and not similar.
If all people are not dishonest, then Shamus is not unfair and Alastair is not tart.
If someone is both dishonest and not similar, then he is environmental.
Someone who is unfair is always both not environmental and not similar.
If Marlon is not environmental, then Marlon is similar.
If there is at least one people who is unfair, then Greyson is dishonest. | Austin is similar. | entailment |
Shamus is environmental.
Alastair is not similar.
Austin is similar.
Shamus is not obedient.
Greyson is obedient.
Marlon is not environmental.
Marlon is not tart.
Alastair is obedient.
Alastair is not dishonest.
Marlon is dishonest.
Tyler is unfair.
Greyson is not environmental.If there is someone who is tart, then Shamus is dishonest and Alastair is obedient.
Tyler being not unfair and Greyson being not tart imply that Aiken is obedient.
Someone is environmental and tart if and only if he is obedient.
It can be concluded that Alastair is environmental once knowing that Tyler is not obedient or Greyson is not unfair.
As long as someone is dishonest, he is not similar and not obedient.
If Shamus is dishonest and Greyson is similar, then Tyler is environmental.
Someone who is not unfair is always both not tart and not similar.
If all people are not dishonest, then Shamus is not unfair and Alastair is not tart.
If someone is both dishonest and not similar, then he is environmental.
Someone who is unfair is always both not environmental and not similar.
If Marlon is not environmental, then Marlon is similar.
If there is at least one people who is unfair, then Greyson is dishonest. | Alastair is not environmental. | contradiction |
Shamus is environmental.
Alastair is not similar.
Austin is similar.
Shamus is not obedient.
Greyson is obedient.
Marlon is not environmental.
Marlon is not tart.
Alastair is obedient.
Alastair is not dishonest.
Marlon is dishonest.
Tyler is unfair.
Greyson is not environmental.If there is someone who is tart, then Shamus is dishonest and Alastair is obedient.
Tyler being not unfair and Greyson being not tart imply that Aiken is obedient.
Someone is environmental and tart if and only if he is obedient.
It can be concluded that Alastair is environmental once knowing that Tyler is not obedient or Greyson is not unfair.
As long as someone is dishonest, he is not similar and not obedient.
If Shamus is dishonest and Greyson is similar, then Tyler is environmental.
Someone who is not unfair is always both not tart and not similar.
If all people are not dishonest, then Shamus is not unfair and Alastair is not tart.
If someone is both dishonest and not similar, then he is environmental.
Someone who is unfair is always both not environmental and not similar.
If Marlon is not environmental, then Marlon is similar.
If there is at least one people who is unfair, then Greyson is dishonest. | Greyson is not environmental. | self_contradiction |
Shamus is environmental.
Alastair is not similar.
Austin is similar.
Shamus is not obedient.
Greyson is obedient.
Marlon is not environmental.
Marlon is not tart.
Alastair is obedient.
Alastair is not dishonest.
Marlon is dishonest.
Tyler is unfair.
Greyson is not environmental.If there is someone who is tart, then Shamus is dishonest and Alastair is obedient.
Tyler being not unfair and Greyson being not tart imply that Aiken is obedient.
Someone is environmental and tart if and only if he is obedient.
It can be concluded that Alastair is environmental once knowing that Tyler is not obedient or Greyson is not unfair.
As long as someone is dishonest, he is not similar and not obedient.
If Shamus is dishonest and Greyson is similar, then Tyler is environmental.
Someone who is not unfair is always both not tart and not similar.
If all people are not dishonest, then Shamus is not unfair and Alastair is not tart.
If someone is both dishonest and not similar, then he is environmental.
Someone who is unfair is always both not environmental and not similar.
If Marlon is not environmental, then Marlon is similar.
If there is at least one people who is unfair, then Greyson is dishonest. | Shamus is similar. | contradiction |
Shamus is environmental.
Alastair is not similar.
Austin is similar.
Shamus is not obedient.
Greyson is obedient.
Marlon is not environmental.
Marlon is not tart.
Alastair is obedient.
Alastair is not dishonest.
Marlon is dishonest.
Tyler is unfair.
Greyson is not environmental.If there is someone who is tart, then Shamus is dishonest and Alastair is obedient.
Tyler being not unfair and Greyson being not tart imply that Aiken is obedient.
Someone is environmental and tart if and only if he is obedient.
It can be concluded that Alastair is environmental once knowing that Tyler is not obedient or Greyson is not unfair.
As long as someone is dishonest, he is not similar and not obedient.
If Shamus is dishonest and Greyson is similar, then Tyler is environmental.
Someone who is not unfair is always both not tart and not similar.
If all people are not dishonest, then Shamus is not unfair and Alastair is not tart.
If someone is both dishonest and not similar, then he is environmental.
Someone who is unfair is always both not environmental and not similar.
If Marlon is not environmental, then Marlon is similar.
If there is at least one people who is unfair, then Greyson is dishonest. | Greyson is unfair. | neutral |
Shamus is environmental.
Alastair is not similar.
Austin is similar.
Shamus is not obedient.
Greyson is obedient.
Marlon is not environmental.
Marlon is not tart.
Alastair is obedient.
Alastair is not dishonest.
Marlon is dishonest.
Tyler is unfair.
Greyson is not environmental.If there is someone who is tart, then Shamus is dishonest and Alastair is obedient.
Tyler being not unfair and Greyson being not tart imply that Aiken is obedient.
Someone is environmental and tart if and only if he is obedient.
It can be concluded that Alastair is environmental once knowing that Tyler is not obedient or Greyson is not unfair.
As long as someone is dishonest, he is not similar and not obedient.
If Shamus is dishonest and Greyson is similar, then Tyler is environmental.
Someone who is not unfair is always both not tart and not similar.
If all people are not dishonest, then Shamus is not unfair and Alastair is not tart.
If someone is both dishonest and not similar, then he is environmental.
Someone who is unfair is always both not environmental and not similar.
If Marlon is not environmental, then Marlon is similar.
If there is at least one people who is unfair, then Greyson is dishonest. | Shamus is unfair. | neutral |
Shamus is environmental.
Alastair is not similar.
Austin is similar.
Shamus is not obedient.
Greyson is obedient.
Marlon is not environmental.
Marlon is not tart.
Alastair is obedient.
Alastair is not dishonest.
Marlon is dishonest.
Tyler is unfair.
Greyson is not environmental.If there is someone who is tart, then Shamus is dishonest and Alastair is obedient.
Tyler being not unfair and Greyson being not tart imply that Aiken is obedient.
Someone is environmental and tart if and only if he is obedient.
It can be concluded that Alastair is environmental once knowing that Tyler is not obedient or Greyson is not unfair.
As long as someone is dishonest, he is not similar and not obedient.
If Shamus is dishonest and Greyson is similar, then Tyler is environmental.
Someone who is not unfair is always both not tart and not similar.
If all people are not dishonest, then Shamus is not unfair and Alastair is not tart.
If someone is both dishonest and not similar, then he is environmental.
Someone who is unfair is always both not environmental and not similar.
If Marlon is not environmental, then Marlon is similar.
If there is at least one people who is unfair, then Greyson is dishonest. | Greyson is environmental. | self_contradiction |
Shamus is environmental.
Alastair is not similar.
Austin is similar.
Shamus is not obedient.
Greyson is obedient.
Marlon is not environmental.
Marlon is not tart.
Alastair is obedient.
Alastair is not dishonest.
Marlon is dishonest.
Tyler is unfair.
Greyson is not environmental.If there is someone who is tart, then Shamus is dishonest and Alastair is obedient.
Tyler being not unfair and Greyson being not tart imply that Aiken is obedient.
Someone is environmental and tart if and only if he is obedient.
It can be concluded that Alastair is environmental once knowing that Tyler is not obedient or Greyson is not unfair.
As long as someone is dishonest, he is not similar and not obedient.
If Shamus is dishonest and Greyson is similar, then Tyler is environmental.
Someone who is not unfair is always both not tart and not similar.
If all people are not dishonest, then Shamus is not unfair and Alastair is not tart.
If someone is both dishonest and not similar, then he is environmental.
Someone who is unfair is always both not environmental and not similar.
If Marlon is not environmental, then Marlon is similar.
If there is at least one people who is unfair, then Greyson is dishonest. | Austin is unfair. | neutral |
Maribel is not impartial.
Eunice is weary.
Eunice is not impartial.
Eunice is sane.
Eunice is reliable.
Everett is adventurous.
Everett is reliable.
Maribel is not sane.
Della is not adventurous.
Della is not impartial.
Danna is not adventurous.
Halden is reliable.All not weary people are reliable.
Someone being both impartial and unfair is equivalent to being not sane.
Someone being both adventurous and not sane is equivalent to being impartial and not unfair.
Danna is not weary if and only if Della is impartial and Maribel is unfair.
Someone who is unfair and sane is always adventurous and not reliable.
If there is someone who is not sane, then Della is not adventurous.
Someone who is both adventurous and impartial is always not unfair.
If someone who is not sane is also not impartial, then he is adventurous.
As long as someone is either not impartial or weary, he is not unfair and reliable.
If Halden is not sane or Danna is unfair, then Everett is not reliable.
If Halden is adventurous, then Danna is impartial, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not unfair, he is weary and not reliable. | Everett is sane. | neutral |
Maribel is not impartial.
Eunice is weary.
Eunice is not impartial.
Eunice is sane.
Eunice is reliable.
Everett is adventurous.
Everett is reliable.
Maribel is not sane.
Della is not adventurous.
Della is not impartial.
Danna is not adventurous.
Halden is reliable.All not weary people are reliable.
Someone being both impartial and unfair is equivalent to being not sane.
Someone being both adventurous and not sane is equivalent to being impartial and not unfair.
Danna is not weary if and only if Della is impartial and Maribel is unfair.
Someone who is unfair and sane is always adventurous and not reliable.
If there is someone who is not sane, then Della is not adventurous.
Someone who is both adventurous and impartial is always not unfair.
If someone who is not sane is also not impartial, then he is adventurous.
As long as someone is either not impartial or weary, he is not unfair and reliable.
If Halden is not sane or Danna is unfair, then Everett is not reliable.
If Halden is adventurous, then Danna is impartial, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not unfair, he is weary and not reliable. | Della is reliable. | self_contradiction |
Maribel is not impartial.
Eunice is weary.
Eunice is not impartial.
Eunice is sane.
Eunice is reliable.
Everett is adventurous.
Everett is reliable.
Maribel is not sane.
Della is not adventurous.
Della is not impartial.
Danna is not adventurous.
Halden is reliable.All not weary people are reliable.
Someone being both impartial and unfair is equivalent to being not sane.
Someone being both adventurous and not sane is equivalent to being impartial and not unfair.
Danna is not weary if and only if Della is impartial and Maribel is unfair.
Someone who is unfair and sane is always adventurous and not reliable.
If there is someone who is not sane, then Della is not adventurous.
Someone who is both adventurous and impartial is always not unfair.
If someone who is not sane is also not impartial, then he is adventurous.
As long as someone is either not impartial or weary, he is not unfair and reliable.
If Halden is not sane or Danna is unfair, then Everett is not reliable.
If Halden is adventurous, then Danna is impartial, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not unfair, he is weary and not reliable. | Della is not impartial. | entailment |
Maribel is not impartial.
Eunice is weary.
Eunice is not impartial.
Eunice is sane.
Eunice is reliable.
Everett is adventurous.
Everett is reliable.
Maribel is not sane.
Della is not adventurous.
Della is not impartial.
Danna is not adventurous.
Halden is reliable.All not weary people are reliable.
Someone being both impartial and unfair is equivalent to being not sane.
Someone being both adventurous and not sane is equivalent to being impartial and not unfair.
Danna is not weary if and only if Della is impartial and Maribel is unfair.
Someone who is unfair and sane is always adventurous and not reliable.
If there is someone who is not sane, then Della is not adventurous.
Someone who is both adventurous and impartial is always not unfair.
If someone who is not sane is also not impartial, then he is adventurous.
As long as someone is either not impartial or weary, he is not unfair and reliable.
If Halden is not sane or Danna is unfair, then Everett is not reliable.
If Halden is adventurous, then Danna is impartial, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not unfair, he is weary and not reliable. | Eunice is not impartial. | entailment |
Maribel is not impartial.
Eunice is weary.
Eunice is not impartial.
Eunice is sane.
Eunice is reliable.
Everett is adventurous.
Everett is reliable.
Maribel is not sane.
Della is not adventurous.
Della is not impartial.
Danna is not adventurous.
Halden is reliable.All not weary people are reliable.
Someone being both impartial and unfair is equivalent to being not sane.
Someone being both adventurous and not sane is equivalent to being impartial and not unfair.
Danna is not weary if and only if Della is impartial and Maribel is unfair.
Someone who is unfair and sane is always adventurous and not reliable.
If there is someone who is not sane, then Della is not adventurous.
Someone who is both adventurous and impartial is always not unfair.
If someone who is not sane is also not impartial, then he is adventurous.
As long as someone is either not impartial or weary, he is not unfair and reliable.
If Halden is not sane or Danna is unfair, then Everett is not reliable.
If Halden is adventurous, then Danna is impartial, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not unfair, he is weary and not reliable. | Maribel is not impartial. | self_contradiction |
Maribel is not impartial.
Eunice is weary.
Eunice is not impartial.
Eunice is sane.
Eunice is reliable.
Everett is adventurous.
Everett is reliable.
Maribel is not sane.
Della is not adventurous.
Della is not impartial.
Danna is not adventurous.
Halden is reliable.All not weary people are reliable.
Someone being both impartial and unfair is equivalent to being not sane.
Someone being both adventurous and not sane is equivalent to being impartial and not unfair.
Danna is not weary if and only if Della is impartial and Maribel is unfair.
Someone who is unfair and sane is always adventurous and not reliable.
If there is someone who is not sane, then Della is not adventurous.
Someone who is both adventurous and impartial is always not unfair.
If someone who is not sane is also not impartial, then he is adventurous.
As long as someone is either not impartial or weary, he is not unfair and reliable.
If Halden is not sane or Danna is unfair, then Everett is not reliable.
If Halden is adventurous, then Danna is impartial, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not unfair, he is weary and not reliable. | Eunice is not weary. | contradiction |
Maribel is not impartial.
Eunice is weary.
Eunice is not impartial.
Eunice is sane.
Eunice is reliable.
Everett is adventurous.
Everett is reliable.
Maribel is not sane.
Della is not adventurous.
Della is not impartial.
Danna is not adventurous.
Halden is reliable.All not weary people are reliable.
Someone being both impartial and unfair is equivalent to being not sane.
Someone being both adventurous and not sane is equivalent to being impartial and not unfair.
Danna is not weary if and only if Della is impartial and Maribel is unfair.
Someone who is unfair and sane is always adventurous and not reliable.
If there is someone who is not sane, then Della is not adventurous.
Someone who is both adventurous and impartial is always not unfair.
If someone who is not sane is also not impartial, then he is adventurous.
As long as someone is either not impartial or weary, he is not unfair and reliable.
If Halden is not sane or Danna is unfair, then Everett is not reliable.
If Halden is adventurous, then Danna is impartial, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not unfair, he is weary and not reliable. | Della is not reliable. | self_contradiction |
Maribel is not impartial.
Eunice is weary.
Eunice is not impartial.
Eunice is sane.
Eunice is reliable.
Everett is adventurous.
Everett is reliable.
Maribel is not sane.
Della is not adventurous.
Della is not impartial.
Danna is not adventurous.
Halden is reliable.All not weary people are reliable.
Someone being both impartial and unfair is equivalent to being not sane.
Someone being both adventurous and not sane is equivalent to being impartial and not unfair.
Danna is not weary if and only if Della is impartial and Maribel is unfair.
Someone who is unfair and sane is always adventurous and not reliable.
If there is someone who is not sane, then Della is not adventurous.
Someone who is both adventurous and impartial is always not unfair.
If someone who is not sane is also not impartial, then he is adventurous.
As long as someone is either not impartial or weary, he is not unfair and reliable.
If Halden is not sane or Danna is unfair, then Everett is not reliable.
If Halden is adventurous, then Danna is impartial, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not unfair, he is weary and not reliable. | Maribel is unfair. | self_contradiction |
Maribel is not impartial.
Eunice is weary.
Eunice is not impartial.
Eunice is sane.
Eunice is reliable.
Everett is adventurous.
Everett is reliable.
Maribel is not sane.
Della is not adventurous.
Della is not impartial.
Danna is not adventurous.
Halden is reliable.All not weary people are reliable.
Someone being both impartial and unfair is equivalent to being not sane.
Someone being both adventurous and not sane is equivalent to being impartial and not unfair.
Danna is not weary if and only if Della is impartial and Maribel is unfair.
Someone who is unfair and sane is always adventurous and not reliable.
If there is someone who is not sane, then Della is not adventurous.
Someone who is both adventurous and impartial is always not unfair.
If someone who is not sane is also not impartial, then he is adventurous.
As long as someone is either not impartial or weary, he is not unfair and reliable.
If Halden is not sane or Danna is unfair, then Everett is not reliable.
If Halden is adventurous, then Danna is impartial, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not unfair, he is weary and not reliable. | Maribel is not adventurous. | contradiction |
Maribel is not impartial.
Eunice is weary.
Eunice is not impartial.
Eunice is sane.
Eunice is reliable.
Everett is adventurous.
Everett is reliable.
Maribel is not sane.
Della is not adventurous.
Della is not impartial.
Danna is not adventurous.
Halden is reliable.All not weary people are reliable.
Someone being both impartial and unfair is equivalent to being not sane.
Someone being both adventurous and not sane is equivalent to being impartial and not unfair.
Danna is not weary if and only if Della is impartial and Maribel is unfair.
Someone who is unfair and sane is always adventurous and not reliable.
If there is someone who is not sane, then Della is not adventurous.
Someone who is both adventurous and impartial is always not unfair.
If someone who is not sane is also not impartial, then he is adventurous.
As long as someone is either not impartial or weary, he is not unfair and reliable.
If Halden is not sane or Danna is unfair, then Everett is not reliable.
If Halden is adventurous, then Danna is impartial, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not unfair, he is weary and not reliable. | Halden is adventurous. | neutral |
Maribel is not impartial.
Eunice is weary.
Eunice is not impartial.
Eunice is sane.
Eunice is reliable.
Everett is adventurous.
Everett is reliable.
Maribel is not sane.
Della is not adventurous.
Della is not impartial.
Danna is not adventurous.
Halden is reliable.All not weary people are reliable.
Someone being both impartial and unfair is equivalent to being not sane.
Someone being both adventurous and not sane is equivalent to being impartial and not unfair.
Danna is not weary if and only if Della is impartial and Maribel is unfair.
Someone who is unfair and sane is always adventurous and not reliable.
If there is someone who is not sane, then Della is not adventurous.
Someone who is both adventurous and impartial is always not unfair.
If someone who is not sane is also not impartial, then he is adventurous.
As long as someone is either not impartial or weary, he is not unfair and reliable.
If Halden is not sane or Danna is unfair, then Everett is not reliable.
If Halden is adventurous, then Danna is impartial, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not unfair, he is weary and not reliable. | Danna is reliable. | neutral |
Maribel is not impartial.
Eunice is weary.
Eunice is not impartial.
Eunice is sane.
Eunice is reliable.
Everett is adventurous.
Everett is reliable.
Maribel is not sane.
Della is not adventurous.
Della is not impartial.
Danna is not adventurous.
Halden is reliable.All not weary people are reliable.
Someone being both impartial and unfair is equivalent to being not sane.
Someone being both adventurous and not sane is equivalent to being impartial and not unfair.
Danna is not weary if and only if Della is impartial and Maribel is unfair.
Someone who is unfair and sane is always adventurous and not reliable.
If there is someone who is not sane, then Della is not adventurous.
Someone who is both adventurous and impartial is always not unfair.
If someone who is not sane is also not impartial, then he is adventurous.
As long as someone is either not impartial or weary, he is not unfair and reliable.
If Halden is not sane or Danna is unfair, then Everett is not reliable.
If Halden is adventurous, then Danna is impartial, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not unfair, he is weary and not reliable. | Maribel is not sane. | entailment |
Maribel is not impartial.
Eunice is weary.
Eunice is not impartial.
Eunice is sane.
Eunice is reliable.
Everett is adventurous.
Everett is reliable.
Maribel is not sane.
Della is not adventurous.
Della is not impartial.
Danna is not adventurous.
Halden is reliable.All not weary people are reliable.
Someone being both impartial and unfair is equivalent to being not sane.
Someone being both adventurous and not sane is equivalent to being impartial and not unfair.
Danna is not weary if and only if Della is impartial and Maribel is unfair.
Someone who is unfair and sane is always adventurous and not reliable.
If there is someone who is not sane, then Della is not adventurous.
Someone who is both adventurous and impartial is always not unfair.
If someone who is not sane is also not impartial, then he is adventurous.
As long as someone is either not impartial or weary, he is not unfair and reliable.
If Halden is not sane or Danna is unfair, then Everett is not reliable.
If Halden is adventurous, then Danna is impartial, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not unfair, he is weary and not reliable. | Martin is impartial. | neutral |
Maribel is not impartial.
Eunice is weary.
Eunice is not impartial.
Eunice is sane.
Eunice is reliable.
Everett is adventurous.
Everett is reliable.
Maribel is not sane.
Della is not adventurous.
Della is not impartial.
Danna is not adventurous.
Halden is reliable.All not weary people are reliable.
Someone being both impartial and unfair is equivalent to being not sane.
Someone being both adventurous and not sane is equivalent to being impartial and not unfair.
Danna is not weary if and only if Della is impartial and Maribel is unfair.
Someone who is unfair and sane is always adventurous and not reliable.
If there is someone who is not sane, then Della is not adventurous.
Someone who is both adventurous and impartial is always not unfair.
If someone who is not sane is also not impartial, then he is adventurous.
As long as someone is either not impartial or weary, he is not unfair and reliable.
If Halden is not sane or Danna is unfair, then Everett is not reliable.
If Halden is adventurous, then Danna is impartial, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not unfair, he is weary and not reliable. | Della is weary. | entailment |
Maribel is not impartial.
Eunice is weary.
Eunice is not impartial.
Eunice is sane.
Eunice is reliable.
Everett is adventurous.
Everett is reliable.
Maribel is not sane.
Della is not adventurous.
Della is not impartial.
Danna is not adventurous.
Halden is reliable.All not weary people are reliable.
Someone being both impartial and unfair is equivalent to being not sane.
Someone being both adventurous and not sane is equivalent to being impartial and not unfair.
Danna is not weary if and only if Della is impartial and Maribel is unfair.
Someone who is unfair and sane is always adventurous and not reliable.
If there is someone who is not sane, then Della is not adventurous.
Someone who is both adventurous and impartial is always not unfair.
If someone who is not sane is also not impartial, then he is adventurous.
As long as someone is either not impartial or weary, he is not unfair and reliable.
If Halden is not sane or Danna is unfair, then Everett is not reliable.
If Halden is adventurous, then Danna is impartial, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not unfair, he is weary and not reliable. | Everett is not reliable. | contradiction |
Maribel is not impartial.
Eunice is weary.
Eunice is not impartial.
Eunice is sane.
Eunice is reliable.
Everett is adventurous.
Everett is reliable.
Maribel is not sane.
Della is not adventurous.
Della is not impartial.
Danna is not adventurous.
Halden is reliable.All not weary people are reliable.
Someone being both impartial and unfair is equivalent to being not sane.
Someone being both adventurous and not sane is equivalent to being impartial and not unfair.
Danna is not weary if and only if Della is impartial and Maribel is unfair.
Someone who is unfair and sane is always adventurous and not reliable.
If there is someone who is not sane, then Della is not adventurous.
Someone who is both adventurous and impartial is always not unfair.
If someone who is not sane is also not impartial, then he is adventurous.
As long as someone is either not impartial or weary, he is not unfair and reliable.
If Halden is not sane or Danna is unfair, then Everett is not reliable.
If Halden is adventurous, then Danna is impartial, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not unfair, he is weary and not reliable. | Maribel is not unfair. | self_contradiction |
Maribel is not impartial.
Eunice is weary.
Eunice is not impartial.
Eunice is sane.
Eunice is reliable.
Everett is adventurous.
Everett is reliable.
Maribel is not sane.
Della is not adventurous.
Della is not impartial.
Danna is not adventurous.
Halden is reliable.All not weary people are reliable.
Someone being both impartial and unfair is equivalent to being not sane.
Someone being both adventurous and not sane is equivalent to being impartial and not unfair.
Danna is not weary if and only if Della is impartial and Maribel is unfair.
Someone who is unfair and sane is always adventurous and not reliable.
If there is someone who is not sane, then Della is not adventurous.
Someone who is both adventurous and impartial is always not unfair.
If someone who is not sane is also not impartial, then he is adventurous.
As long as someone is either not impartial or weary, he is not unfair and reliable.
If Halden is not sane or Danna is unfair, then Everett is not reliable.
If Halden is adventurous, then Danna is impartial, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not unfair, he is weary and not reliable. | Maribel is sane. | contradiction |
Maribel is not impartial.
Eunice is weary.
Eunice is not impartial.
Eunice is sane.
Eunice is reliable.
Everett is adventurous.
Everett is reliable.
Maribel is not sane.
Della is not adventurous.
Della is not impartial.
Danna is not adventurous.
Halden is reliable.All not weary people are reliable.
Someone being both impartial and unfair is equivalent to being not sane.
Someone being both adventurous and not sane is equivalent to being impartial and not unfair.
Danna is not weary if and only if Della is impartial and Maribel is unfair.
Someone who is unfair and sane is always adventurous and not reliable.
If there is someone who is not sane, then Della is not adventurous.
Someone who is both adventurous and impartial is always not unfair.
If someone who is not sane is also not impartial, then he is adventurous.
As long as someone is either not impartial or weary, he is not unfair and reliable.
If Halden is not sane or Danna is unfair, then Everett is not reliable.
If Halden is adventurous, then Danna is impartial, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not unfair, he is weary and not reliable. | Martin is unfair. | neutral |
Maribel is not impartial.
Eunice is weary.
Eunice is not impartial.
Eunice is sane.
Eunice is reliable.
Everett is adventurous.
Everett is reliable.
Maribel is not sane.
Della is not adventurous.
Della is not impartial.
Danna is not adventurous.
Halden is reliable.All not weary people are reliable.
Someone being both impartial and unfair is equivalent to being not sane.
Someone being both adventurous and not sane is equivalent to being impartial and not unfair.
Danna is not weary if and only if Della is impartial and Maribel is unfair.
Someone who is unfair and sane is always adventurous and not reliable.
If there is someone who is not sane, then Della is not adventurous.
Someone who is both adventurous and impartial is always not unfair.
If someone who is not sane is also not impartial, then he is adventurous.
As long as someone is either not impartial or weary, he is not unfair and reliable.
If Halden is not sane or Danna is unfair, then Everett is not reliable.
If Halden is adventurous, then Danna is impartial, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not unfair, he is weary and not reliable. | Della is not unfair. | entailment |
Maribel is not impartial.
Eunice is weary.
Eunice is not impartial.
Eunice is sane.
Eunice is reliable.
Everett is adventurous.
Everett is reliable.
Maribel is not sane.
Della is not adventurous.
Della is not impartial.
Danna is not adventurous.
Halden is reliable.All not weary people are reliable.
Someone being both impartial and unfair is equivalent to being not sane.
Someone being both adventurous and not sane is equivalent to being impartial and not unfair.
Danna is not weary if and only if Della is impartial and Maribel is unfair.
Someone who is unfair and sane is always adventurous and not reliable.
If there is someone who is not sane, then Della is not adventurous.
Someone who is both adventurous and impartial is always not unfair.
If someone who is not sane is also not impartial, then he is adventurous.
As long as someone is either not impartial or weary, he is not unfair and reliable.
If Halden is not sane or Danna is unfair, then Everett is not reliable.
If Halden is adventurous, then Danna is impartial, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not unfair, he is weary and not reliable. | Della is unfair. | contradiction |
Mila is ambitious.
Amery is repulsive.
Uriah is not inner.
Hadwin is repulsive.
Uriah is repulsive.
Curtis is not ambitious.
Hadwin is successful.
Uriah is tremendous.
Mila is not inner.
Blanca is not successful.
Mila is dishonest.
Uriah is successful.If someone is both repulsive and tremendous, then he is successful.
Curtis being ambitious implies that Uriah is inner.
If Mila is inner, then Blanca is not successful, and vice versa.
Someone being both not tremendous and not inner is equivalent to being not dishonest.
Amery being inner and Blanca being repulsive imply that Blanca is successful and Amery is not dishonest.
If Mila is repulsive, then Uriah is tremendous, and vice versa.
If someone is inner, then he is not dishonest.
It can be concluded that Mila is successful once knowing that Uriah is not repulsive.
Mila being ambitious implies that Blanca is successful.
Someone who is not tremendous is always both not repulsive and not dishonest.
Someone who is both not repulsive and not ambitious is always tremendous.
Someone being successful is equivalent to being not tremendous. | Mila is not successful. | contradiction |
Mila is ambitious.
Amery is repulsive.
Uriah is not inner.
Hadwin is repulsive.
Uriah is repulsive.
Curtis is not ambitious.
Hadwin is successful.
Uriah is tremendous.
Mila is not inner.
Blanca is not successful.
Mila is dishonest.
Uriah is successful.If someone is both repulsive and tremendous, then he is successful.
Curtis being ambitious implies that Uriah is inner.
If Mila is inner, then Blanca is not successful, and vice versa.
Someone being both not tremendous and not inner is equivalent to being not dishonest.
Amery being inner and Blanca being repulsive imply that Blanca is successful and Amery is not dishonest.
If Mila is repulsive, then Uriah is tremendous, and vice versa.
If someone is inner, then he is not dishonest.
It can be concluded that Mila is successful once knowing that Uriah is not repulsive.
Mila being ambitious implies that Blanca is successful.
Someone who is not tremendous is always both not repulsive and not dishonest.
Someone who is both not repulsive and not ambitious is always tremendous.
Someone being successful is equivalent to being not tremendous. | Hadwin is tremendous. | contradiction |
Mila is ambitious.
Amery is repulsive.
Uriah is not inner.
Hadwin is repulsive.
Uriah is repulsive.
Curtis is not ambitious.
Hadwin is successful.
Uriah is tremendous.
Mila is not inner.
Blanca is not successful.
Mila is dishonest.
Uriah is successful.If someone is both repulsive and tremendous, then he is successful.
Curtis being ambitious implies that Uriah is inner.
If Mila is inner, then Blanca is not successful, and vice versa.
Someone being both not tremendous and not inner is equivalent to being not dishonest.
Amery being inner and Blanca being repulsive imply that Blanca is successful and Amery is not dishonest.
If Mila is repulsive, then Uriah is tremendous, and vice versa.
If someone is inner, then he is not dishonest.
It can be concluded that Mila is successful once knowing that Uriah is not repulsive.
Mila being ambitious implies that Blanca is successful.
Someone who is not tremendous is always both not repulsive and not dishonest.
Someone who is both not repulsive and not ambitious is always tremendous.
Someone being successful is equivalent to being not tremendous. | Amery is not dishonest. | neutral |
Mila is ambitious.
Amery is repulsive.
Uriah is not inner.
Hadwin is repulsive.
Uriah is repulsive.
Curtis is not ambitious.
Hadwin is successful.
Uriah is tremendous.
Mila is not inner.
Blanca is not successful.
Mila is dishonest.
Uriah is successful.If someone is both repulsive and tremendous, then he is successful.
Curtis being ambitious implies that Uriah is inner.
If Mila is inner, then Blanca is not successful, and vice versa.
Someone being both not tremendous and not inner is equivalent to being not dishonest.
Amery being inner and Blanca being repulsive imply that Blanca is successful and Amery is not dishonest.
If Mila is repulsive, then Uriah is tremendous, and vice versa.
If someone is inner, then he is not dishonest.
It can be concluded that Mila is successful once knowing that Uriah is not repulsive.
Mila being ambitious implies that Blanca is successful.
Someone who is not tremendous is always both not repulsive and not dishonest.
Someone who is both not repulsive and not ambitious is always tremendous.
Someone being successful is equivalent to being not tremendous. | Blanca is dishonest. | contradiction |
Mila is ambitious.
Amery is repulsive.
Uriah is not inner.
Hadwin is repulsive.
Uriah is repulsive.
Curtis is not ambitious.
Hadwin is successful.
Uriah is tremendous.
Mila is not inner.
Blanca is not successful.
Mila is dishonest.
Uriah is successful.If someone is both repulsive and tremendous, then he is successful.
Curtis being ambitious implies that Uriah is inner.
If Mila is inner, then Blanca is not successful, and vice versa.
Someone being both not tremendous and not inner is equivalent to being not dishonest.
Amery being inner and Blanca being repulsive imply that Blanca is successful and Amery is not dishonest.
If Mila is repulsive, then Uriah is tremendous, and vice versa.
If someone is inner, then he is not dishonest.
It can be concluded that Mila is successful once knowing that Uriah is not repulsive.
Mila being ambitious implies that Blanca is successful.
Someone who is not tremendous is always both not repulsive and not dishonest.
Someone who is both not repulsive and not ambitious is always tremendous.
Someone being successful is equivalent to being not tremendous. | Mila is not dishonest. | self_contradiction |
Mila is ambitious.
Amery is repulsive.
Uriah is not inner.
Hadwin is repulsive.
Uriah is repulsive.
Curtis is not ambitious.
Hadwin is successful.
Uriah is tremendous.
Mila is not inner.
Blanca is not successful.
Mila is dishonest.
Uriah is successful.If someone is both repulsive and tremendous, then he is successful.
Curtis being ambitious implies that Uriah is inner.
If Mila is inner, then Blanca is not successful, and vice versa.
Someone being both not tremendous and not inner is equivalent to being not dishonest.
Amery being inner and Blanca being repulsive imply that Blanca is successful and Amery is not dishonest.
If Mila is repulsive, then Uriah is tremendous, and vice versa.
If someone is inner, then he is not dishonest.
It can be concluded that Mila is successful once knowing that Uriah is not repulsive.
Mila being ambitious implies that Blanca is successful.
Someone who is not tremendous is always both not repulsive and not dishonest.
Someone who is both not repulsive and not ambitious is always tremendous.
Someone being successful is equivalent to being not tremendous. | Curtis is tremendous. | neutral |
Mila is ambitious.
Amery is repulsive.
Uriah is not inner.
Hadwin is repulsive.
Uriah is repulsive.
Curtis is not ambitious.
Hadwin is successful.
Uriah is tremendous.
Mila is not inner.
Blanca is not successful.
Mila is dishonest.
Uriah is successful.If someone is both repulsive and tremendous, then he is successful.
Curtis being ambitious implies that Uriah is inner.
If Mila is inner, then Blanca is not successful, and vice versa.
Someone being both not tremendous and not inner is equivalent to being not dishonest.
Amery being inner and Blanca being repulsive imply that Blanca is successful and Amery is not dishonest.
If Mila is repulsive, then Uriah is tremendous, and vice versa.
If someone is inner, then he is not dishonest.
It can be concluded that Mila is successful once knowing that Uriah is not repulsive.
Mila being ambitious implies that Blanca is successful.
Someone who is not tremendous is always both not repulsive and not dishonest.
Someone who is both not repulsive and not ambitious is always tremendous.
Someone being successful is equivalent to being not tremendous. | Amery is not repulsive. | contradiction |
Mila is ambitious.
Amery is repulsive.
Uriah is not inner.
Hadwin is repulsive.
Uriah is repulsive.
Curtis is not ambitious.
Hadwin is successful.
Uriah is tremendous.
Mila is not inner.
Blanca is not successful.
Mila is dishonest.
Uriah is successful.If someone is both repulsive and tremendous, then he is successful.
Curtis being ambitious implies that Uriah is inner.
If Mila is inner, then Blanca is not successful, and vice versa.
Someone being both not tremendous and not inner is equivalent to being not dishonest.
Amery being inner and Blanca being repulsive imply that Blanca is successful and Amery is not dishonest.
If Mila is repulsive, then Uriah is tremendous, and vice versa.
If someone is inner, then he is not dishonest.
It can be concluded that Mila is successful once knowing that Uriah is not repulsive.
Mila being ambitious implies that Blanca is successful.
Someone who is not tremendous is always both not repulsive and not dishonest.
Someone who is both not repulsive and not ambitious is always tremendous.
Someone being successful is equivalent to being not tremendous. | Blanca is not ambitious. | neutral |
Mila is ambitious.
Amery is repulsive.
Uriah is not inner.
Hadwin is repulsive.
Uriah is repulsive.
Curtis is not ambitious.
Hadwin is successful.
Uriah is tremendous.
Mila is not inner.
Blanca is not successful.
Mila is dishonest.
Uriah is successful.If someone is both repulsive and tremendous, then he is successful.
Curtis being ambitious implies that Uriah is inner.
If Mila is inner, then Blanca is not successful, and vice versa.
Someone being both not tremendous and not inner is equivalent to being not dishonest.
Amery being inner and Blanca being repulsive imply that Blanca is successful and Amery is not dishonest.
If Mila is repulsive, then Uriah is tremendous, and vice versa.
If someone is inner, then he is not dishonest.
It can be concluded that Mila is successful once knowing that Uriah is not repulsive.
Mila being ambitious implies that Blanca is successful.
Someone who is not tremendous is always both not repulsive and not dishonest.
Someone who is both not repulsive and not ambitious is always tremendous.
Someone being successful is equivalent to being not tremendous. | Mila is not ambitious. | contradiction |
Mila is ambitious.
Amery is repulsive.
Uriah is not inner.
Hadwin is repulsive.
Uriah is repulsive.
Curtis is not ambitious.
Hadwin is successful.
Uriah is tremendous.
Mila is not inner.
Blanca is not successful.
Mila is dishonest.
Uriah is successful.If someone is both repulsive and tremendous, then he is successful.
Curtis being ambitious implies that Uriah is inner.
If Mila is inner, then Blanca is not successful, and vice versa.
Someone being both not tremendous and not inner is equivalent to being not dishonest.
Amery being inner and Blanca being repulsive imply that Blanca is successful and Amery is not dishonest.
If Mila is repulsive, then Uriah is tremendous, and vice versa.
If someone is inner, then he is not dishonest.
It can be concluded that Mila is successful once knowing that Uriah is not repulsive.
Mila being ambitious implies that Blanca is successful.
Someone who is not tremendous is always both not repulsive and not dishonest.
Someone who is both not repulsive and not ambitious is always tremendous.
Someone being successful is equivalent to being not tremendous. | Uriah is successful. | entailment |
Mila is ambitious.
Amery is repulsive.
Uriah is not inner.
Hadwin is repulsive.
Uriah is repulsive.
Curtis is not ambitious.
Hadwin is successful.
Uriah is tremendous.
Mila is not inner.
Blanca is not successful.
Mila is dishonest.
Uriah is successful.If someone is both repulsive and tremendous, then he is successful.
Curtis being ambitious implies that Uriah is inner.
If Mila is inner, then Blanca is not successful, and vice versa.
Someone being both not tremendous and not inner is equivalent to being not dishonest.
Amery being inner and Blanca being repulsive imply that Blanca is successful and Amery is not dishonest.
If Mila is repulsive, then Uriah is tremendous, and vice versa.
If someone is inner, then he is not dishonest.
It can be concluded that Mila is successful once knowing that Uriah is not repulsive.
Mila being ambitious implies that Blanca is successful.
Someone who is not tremendous is always both not repulsive and not dishonest.
Someone who is both not repulsive and not ambitious is always tremendous.
Someone being successful is equivalent to being not tremendous. | Mila is not repulsive. | self_contradiction |
Mila is ambitious.
Amery is repulsive.
Uriah is not inner.
Hadwin is repulsive.
Uriah is repulsive.
Curtis is not ambitious.
Hadwin is successful.
Uriah is tremendous.
Mila is not inner.
Blanca is not successful.
Mila is dishonest.
Uriah is successful.If someone is both repulsive and tremendous, then he is successful.
Curtis being ambitious implies that Uriah is inner.
If Mila is inner, then Blanca is not successful, and vice versa.
Someone being both not tremendous and not inner is equivalent to being not dishonest.
Amery being inner and Blanca being repulsive imply that Blanca is successful and Amery is not dishonest.
If Mila is repulsive, then Uriah is tremendous, and vice versa.
If someone is inner, then he is not dishonest.
It can be concluded that Mila is successful once knowing that Uriah is not repulsive.
Mila being ambitious implies that Blanca is successful.
Someone who is not tremendous is always both not repulsive and not dishonest.
Someone who is both not repulsive and not ambitious is always tremendous.
Someone being successful is equivalent to being not tremendous. | Uriah is not repulsive. | self_contradiction |
Mila is ambitious.
Amery is repulsive.
Uriah is not inner.
Hadwin is repulsive.
Uriah is repulsive.
Curtis is not ambitious.
Hadwin is successful.
Uriah is tremendous.
Mila is not inner.
Blanca is not successful.
Mila is dishonest.
Uriah is successful.If someone is both repulsive and tremendous, then he is successful.
Curtis being ambitious implies that Uriah is inner.
If Mila is inner, then Blanca is not successful, and vice versa.
Someone being both not tremendous and not inner is equivalent to being not dishonest.
Amery being inner and Blanca being repulsive imply that Blanca is successful and Amery is not dishonest.
If Mila is repulsive, then Uriah is tremendous, and vice versa.
If someone is inner, then he is not dishonest.
It can be concluded that Mila is successful once knowing that Uriah is not repulsive.
Mila being ambitious implies that Blanca is successful.
Someone who is not tremendous is always both not repulsive and not dishonest.
Someone who is both not repulsive and not ambitious is always tremendous.
Someone being successful is equivalent to being not tremendous. | Blanca is successful. | self_contradiction |
Mila is ambitious.
Amery is repulsive.
Uriah is not inner.
Hadwin is repulsive.
Uriah is repulsive.
Curtis is not ambitious.
Hadwin is successful.
Uriah is tremendous.
Mila is not inner.
Blanca is not successful.
Mila is dishonest.
Uriah is successful.If someone is both repulsive and tremendous, then he is successful.
Curtis being ambitious implies that Uriah is inner.
If Mila is inner, then Blanca is not successful, and vice versa.
Someone being both not tremendous and not inner is equivalent to being not dishonest.
Amery being inner and Blanca being repulsive imply that Blanca is successful and Amery is not dishonest.
If Mila is repulsive, then Uriah is tremendous, and vice versa.
If someone is inner, then he is not dishonest.
It can be concluded that Mila is successful once knowing that Uriah is not repulsive.
Mila being ambitious implies that Blanca is successful.
Someone who is not tremendous is always both not repulsive and not dishonest.
Someone who is both not repulsive and not ambitious is always tremendous.
Someone being successful is equivalent to being not tremendous. | Mila is inner. | self_contradiction |
Mila is ambitious.
Amery is repulsive.
Uriah is not inner.
Hadwin is repulsive.
Uriah is repulsive.
Curtis is not ambitious.
Hadwin is successful.
Uriah is tremendous.
Mila is not inner.
Blanca is not successful.
Mila is dishonest.
Uriah is successful.If someone is both repulsive and tremendous, then he is successful.
Curtis being ambitious implies that Uriah is inner.
If Mila is inner, then Blanca is not successful, and vice versa.
Someone being both not tremendous and not inner is equivalent to being not dishonest.
Amery being inner and Blanca being repulsive imply that Blanca is successful and Amery is not dishonest.
If Mila is repulsive, then Uriah is tremendous, and vice versa.
If someone is inner, then he is not dishonest.
It can be concluded that Mila is successful once knowing that Uriah is not repulsive.
Mila being ambitious implies that Blanca is successful.
Someone who is not tremendous is always both not repulsive and not dishonest.
Someone who is both not repulsive and not ambitious is always tremendous.
Someone being successful is equivalent to being not tremendous. | Blanca is not tremendous. | entailment |
Mila is ambitious.
Amery is repulsive.
Uriah is not inner.
Hadwin is repulsive.
Uriah is repulsive.
Curtis is not ambitious.
Hadwin is successful.
Uriah is tremendous.
Mila is not inner.
Blanca is not successful.
Mila is dishonest.
Uriah is successful.If someone is both repulsive and tremendous, then he is successful.
Curtis being ambitious implies that Uriah is inner.
If Mila is inner, then Blanca is not successful, and vice versa.
Someone being both not tremendous and not inner is equivalent to being not dishonest.
Amery being inner and Blanca being repulsive imply that Blanca is successful and Amery is not dishonest.
If Mila is repulsive, then Uriah is tremendous, and vice versa.
If someone is inner, then he is not dishonest.
It can be concluded that Mila is successful once knowing that Uriah is not repulsive.
Mila being ambitious implies that Blanca is successful.
Someone who is not tremendous is always both not repulsive and not dishonest.
Someone who is both not repulsive and not ambitious is always tremendous.
Someone being successful is equivalent to being not tremendous. | Curtis is not ambitious. | entailment |
Mila is ambitious.
Amery is repulsive.
Uriah is not inner.
Hadwin is repulsive.
Uriah is repulsive.
Curtis is not ambitious.
Hadwin is successful.
Uriah is tremendous.
Mila is not inner.
Blanca is not successful.
Mila is dishonest.
Uriah is successful.If someone is both repulsive and tremendous, then he is successful.
Curtis being ambitious implies that Uriah is inner.
If Mila is inner, then Blanca is not successful, and vice versa.
Someone being both not tremendous and not inner is equivalent to being not dishonest.
Amery being inner and Blanca being repulsive imply that Blanca is successful and Amery is not dishonest.
If Mila is repulsive, then Uriah is tremendous, and vice versa.
If someone is inner, then he is not dishonest.
It can be concluded that Mila is successful once knowing that Uriah is not repulsive.
Mila being ambitious implies that Blanca is successful.
Someone who is not tremendous is always both not repulsive and not dishonest.
Someone who is both not repulsive and not ambitious is always tremendous.
Someone being successful is equivalent to being not tremendous. | Mila is not tremendous. | entailment |
Mila is ambitious.
Amery is repulsive.
Uriah is not inner.
Hadwin is repulsive.
Uriah is repulsive.
Curtis is not ambitious.
Hadwin is successful.
Uriah is tremendous.
Mila is not inner.
Blanca is not successful.
Mila is dishonest.
Uriah is successful.If someone is both repulsive and tremendous, then he is successful.
Curtis being ambitious implies that Uriah is inner.
If Mila is inner, then Blanca is not successful, and vice versa.
Someone being both not tremendous and not inner is equivalent to being not dishonest.
Amery being inner and Blanca being repulsive imply that Blanca is successful and Amery is not dishonest.
If Mila is repulsive, then Uriah is tremendous, and vice versa.
If someone is inner, then he is not dishonest.
It can be concluded that Mila is successful once knowing that Uriah is not repulsive.
Mila being ambitious implies that Blanca is successful.
Someone who is not tremendous is always both not repulsive and not dishonest.
Someone who is both not repulsive and not ambitious is always tremendous.
Someone being successful is equivalent to being not tremendous. | Leslie is tremendous. | neutral |
Mila is ambitious.
Amery is repulsive.
Uriah is not inner.
Hadwin is repulsive.
Uriah is repulsive.
Curtis is not ambitious.
Hadwin is successful.
Uriah is tremendous.
Mila is not inner.
Blanca is not successful.
Mila is dishonest.
Uriah is successful.If someone is both repulsive and tremendous, then he is successful.
Curtis being ambitious implies that Uriah is inner.
If Mila is inner, then Blanca is not successful, and vice versa.
Someone being both not tremendous and not inner is equivalent to being not dishonest.
Amery being inner and Blanca being repulsive imply that Blanca is successful and Amery is not dishonest.
If Mila is repulsive, then Uriah is tremendous, and vice versa.
If someone is inner, then he is not dishonest.
It can be concluded that Mila is successful once knowing that Uriah is not repulsive.
Mila being ambitious implies that Blanca is successful.
Someone who is not tremendous is always both not repulsive and not dishonest.
Someone who is both not repulsive and not ambitious is always tremendous.
Someone being successful is equivalent to being not tremendous. | Leslie is not successful. | neutral |
Mila is ambitious.
Amery is repulsive.
Uriah is not inner.
Hadwin is repulsive.
Uriah is repulsive.
Curtis is not ambitious.
Hadwin is successful.
Uriah is tremendous.
Mila is not inner.
Blanca is not successful.
Mila is dishonest.
Uriah is successful.If someone is both repulsive and tremendous, then he is successful.
Curtis being ambitious implies that Uriah is inner.
If Mila is inner, then Blanca is not successful, and vice versa.
Someone being both not tremendous and not inner is equivalent to being not dishonest.
Amery being inner and Blanca being repulsive imply that Blanca is successful and Amery is not dishonest.
If Mila is repulsive, then Uriah is tremendous, and vice versa.
If someone is inner, then he is not dishonest.
It can be concluded that Mila is successful once knowing that Uriah is not repulsive.
Mila being ambitious implies that Blanca is successful.
Someone who is not tremendous is always both not repulsive and not dishonest.
Someone who is both not repulsive and not ambitious is always tremendous.
Someone being successful is equivalent to being not tremendous. | Blanca is not repulsive. | entailment |
Brooke is not lucky.
Irvin is not bumpy.
Otis is good.
Irvin is worried.
Fred is careful.
Brooke is not worried.
Griswald is not confident.
Otis is lucky.
Cuthbert is good.
Griswald is not worried.
Griswald is good.
Cuthbert is worried.If there is someone who is either not bumpy or not lucky, then Brooke is worried.
It can be concluded that Griswald is worried once knowing that Griswald is confident or Cuthbert is not lucky.
Someone who is not worried or not confident is always not bumpy and good.
If someone is not careful, then he is good, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Fred is lucky once knowing that Brooke is worried or Cuthbert is not good.
If there is at least one people who is lucky or confident, then Lincoln is not worried.
Someone is not worried and bumpy if and only if he is not confident and not lucky.
If Cuthbert is not lucky, then Irvin is not good.
Someone is not worried if and only if he is bumpy.
Someone being not careful is equivalent to being not confident.
It can be concluded that Brooke is lucky once knowing that Fred is not careful.
Someone who is not worried is always good. | Brooke is not good. | contradiction |
Brooke is not lucky.
Irvin is not bumpy.
Otis is good.
Irvin is worried.
Fred is careful.
Brooke is not worried.
Griswald is not confident.
Otis is lucky.
Cuthbert is good.
Griswald is not worried.
Griswald is good.
Cuthbert is worried.If there is someone who is either not bumpy or not lucky, then Brooke is worried.
It can be concluded that Griswald is worried once knowing that Griswald is confident or Cuthbert is not lucky.
Someone who is not worried or not confident is always not bumpy and good.
If someone is not careful, then he is good, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Fred is lucky once knowing that Brooke is worried or Cuthbert is not good.
If there is at least one people who is lucky or confident, then Lincoln is not worried.
Someone is not worried and bumpy if and only if he is not confident and not lucky.
If Cuthbert is not lucky, then Irvin is not good.
Someone is not worried if and only if he is bumpy.
Someone being not careful is equivalent to being not confident.
It can be concluded that Brooke is lucky once knowing that Fred is not careful.
Someone who is not worried is always good. | Cuthbert is lucky. | neutral |
Brooke is not lucky.
Irvin is not bumpy.
Otis is good.
Irvin is worried.
Fred is careful.
Brooke is not worried.
Griswald is not confident.
Otis is lucky.
Cuthbert is good.
Griswald is not worried.
Griswald is good.
Cuthbert is worried.If there is someone who is either not bumpy or not lucky, then Brooke is worried.
It can be concluded that Griswald is worried once knowing that Griswald is confident or Cuthbert is not lucky.
Someone who is not worried or not confident is always not bumpy and good.
If someone is not careful, then he is good, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Fred is lucky once knowing that Brooke is worried or Cuthbert is not good.
If there is at least one people who is lucky or confident, then Lincoln is not worried.
Someone is not worried and bumpy if and only if he is not confident and not lucky.
If Cuthbert is not lucky, then Irvin is not good.
Someone is not worried if and only if he is bumpy.
Someone being not careful is equivalent to being not confident.
It can be concluded that Brooke is lucky once knowing that Fred is not careful.
Someone who is not worried is always good. | Cuthbert is not lucky. | neutral |
Brooke is not lucky.
Irvin is not bumpy.
Otis is good.
Irvin is worried.
Fred is careful.
Brooke is not worried.
Griswald is not confident.
Otis is lucky.
Cuthbert is good.
Griswald is not worried.
Griswald is good.
Cuthbert is worried.If there is someone who is either not bumpy or not lucky, then Brooke is worried.
It can be concluded that Griswald is worried once knowing that Griswald is confident or Cuthbert is not lucky.
Someone who is not worried or not confident is always not bumpy and good.
If someone is not careful, then he is good, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Fred is lucky once knowing that Brooke is worried or Cuthbert is not good.
If there is at least one people who is lucky or confident, then Lincoln is not worried.
Someone is not worried and bumpy if and only if he is not confident and not lucky.
If Cuthbert is not lucky, then Irvin is not good.
Someone is not worried if and only if he is bumpy.
Someone being not careful is equivalent to being not confident.
It can be concluded that Brooke is lucky once knowing that Fred is not careful.
Someone who is not worried is always good. | Griswald is lucky. | contradiction |
Brooke is not lucky.
Irvin is not bumpy.
Otis is good.
Irvin is worried.
Fred is careful.
Brooke is not worried.
Griswald is not confident.
Otis is lucky.
Cuthbert is good.
Griswald is not worried.
Griswald is good.
Cuthbert is worried.If there is someone who is either not bumpy or not lucky, then Brooke is worried.
It can be concluded that Griswald is worried once knowing that Griswald is confident or Cuthbert is not lucky.
Someone who is not worried or not confident is always not bumpy and good.
If someone is not careful, then he is good, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Fred is lucky once knowing that Brooke is worried or Cuthbert is not good.
If there is at least one people who is lucky or confident, then Lincoln is not worried.
Someone is not worried and bumpy if and only if he is not confident and not lucky.
If Cuthbert is not lucky, then Irvin is not good.
Someone is not worried if and only if he is bumpy.
Someone being not careful is equivalent to being not confident.
It can be concluded that Brooke is lucky once knowing that Fred is not careful.
Someone who is not worried is always good. | Brooke is worried. | self_contradiction |
Brooke is not lucky.
Irvin is not bumpy.
Otis is good.
Irvin is worried.
Fred is careful.
Brooke is not worried.
Griswald is not confident.
Otis is lucky.
Cuthbert is good.
Griswald is not worried.
Griswald is good.
Cuthbert is worried.If there is someone who is either not bumpy or not lucky, then Brooke is worried.
It can be concluded that Griswald is worried once knowing that Griswald is confident or Cuthbert is not lucky.
Someone who is not worried or not confident is always not bumpy and good.
If someone is not careful, then he is good, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Fred is lucky once knowing that Brooke is worried or Cuthbert is not good.
If there is at least one people who is lucky or confident, then Lincoln is not worried.
Someone is not worried and bumpy if and only if he is not confident and not lucky.
If Cuthbert is not lucky, then Irvin is not good.
Someone is not worried if and only if he is bumpy.
Someone being not careful is equivalent to being not confident.
It can be concluded that Brooke is lucky once knowing that Fred is not careful.
Someone who is not worried is always good. | Otis is not confident. | entailment |
Brooke is not lucky.
Irvin is not bumpy.
Otis is good.
Irvin is worried.
Fred is careful.
Brooke is not worried.
Griswald is not confident.
Otis is lucky.
Cuthbert is good.
Griswald is not worried.
Griswald is good.
Cuthbert is worried.If there is someone who is either not bumpy or not lucky, then Brooke is worried.
It can be concluded that Griswald is worried once knowing that Griswald is confident or Cuthbert is not lucky.
Someone who is not worried or not confident is always not bumpy and good.
If someone is not careful, then he is good, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Fred is lucky once knowing that Brooke is worried or Cuthbert is not good.
If there is at least one people who is lucky or confident, then Lincoln is not worried.
Someone is not worried and bumpy if and only if he is not confident and not lucky.
If Cuthbert is not lucky, then Irvin is not good.
Someone is not worried if and only if he is bumpy.
Someone being not careful is equivalent to being not confident.
It can be concluded that Brooke is lucky once knowing that Fred is not careful.
Someone who is not worried is always good. | Cuthbert is bumpy. | contradiction |
Brooke is not lucky.
Irvin is not bumpy.
Otis is good.
Irvin is worried.
Fred is careful.
Brooke is not worried.
Griswald is not confident.
Otis is lucky.
Cuthbert is good.
Griswald is not worried.
Griswald is good.
Cuthbert is worried.If there is someone who is either not bumpy or not lucky, then Brooke is worried.
It can be concluded that Griswald is worried once knowing that Griswald is confident or Cuthbert is not lucky.
Someone who is not worried or not confident is always not bumpy and good.
If someone is not careful, then he is good, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Fred is lucky once knowing that Brooke is worried or Cuthbert is not good.
If there is at least one people who is lucky or confident, then Lincoln is not worried.
Someone is not worried and bumpy if and only if he is not confident and not lucky.
If Cuthbert is not lucky, then Irvin is not good.
Someone is not worried if and only if he is bumpy.
Someone being not careful is equivalent to being not confident.
It can be concluded that Brooke is lucky once knowing that Fred is not careful.
Someone who is not worried is always good. | Otis is careful. | contradiction |
Brooke is not lucky.
Irvin is not bumpy.
Otis is good.
Irvin is worried.
Fred is careful.
Brooke is not worried.
Griswald is not confident.
Otis is lucky.
Cuthbert is good.
Griswald is not worried.
Griswald is good.
Cuthbert is worried.If there is someone who is either not bumpy or not lucky, then Brooke is worried.
It can be concluded that Griswald is worried once knowing that Griswald is confident or Cuthbert is not lucky.
Someone who is not worried or not confident is always not bumpy and good.
If someone is not careful, then he is good, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Fred is lucky once knowing that Brooke is worried or Cuthbert is not good.
If there is at least one people who is lucky or confident, then Lincoln is not worried.
Someone is not worried and bumpy if and only if he is not confident and not lucky.
If Cuthbert is not lucky, then Irvin is not good.
Someone is not worried if and only if he is bumpy.
Someone being not careful is equivalent to being not confident.
It can be concluded that Brooke is lucky once knowing that Fred is not careful.
Someone who is not worried is always good. | Lincoln is not bumpy. | self_contradiction |
Brooke is not lucky.
Irvin is not bumpy.
Otis is good.
Irvin is worried.
Fred is careful.
Brooke is not worried.
Griswald is not confident.
Otis is lucky.
Cuthbert is good.
Griswald is not worried.
Griswald is good.
Cuthbert is worried.If there is someone who is either not bumpy or not lucky, then Brooke is worried.
It can be concluded that Griswald is worried once knowing that Griswald is confident or Cuthbert is not lucky.
Someone who is not worried or not confident is always not bumpy and good.
If someone is not careful, then he is good, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Fred is lucky once knowing that Brooke is worried or Cuthbert is not good.
If there is at least one people who is lucky or confident, then Lincoln is not worried.
Someone is not worried and bumpy if and only if he is not confident and not lucky.
If Cuthbert is not lucky, then Irvin is not good.
Someone is not worried if and only if he is bumpy.
Someone being not careful is equivalent to being not confident.
It can be concluded that Brooke is lucky once knowing that Fred is not careful.
Someone who is not worried is always good. | Brooke is bumpy. | self_contradiction |
Brooke is not lucky.
Irvin is not bumpy.
Otis is good.
Irvin is worried.
Fred is careful.
Brooke is not worried.
Griswald is not confident.
Otis is lucky.
Cuthbert is good.
Griswald is not worried.
Griswald is good.
Cuthbert is worried.If there is someone who is either not bumpy or not lucky, then Brooke is worried.
It can be concluded that Griswald is worried once knowing that Griswald is confident or Cuthbert is not lucky.
Someone who is not worried or not confident is always not bumpy and good.
If someone is not careful, then he is good, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Fred is lucky once knowing that Brooke is worried or Cuthbert is not good.
If there is at least one people who is lucky or confident, then Lincoln is not worried.
Someone is not worried and bumpy if and only if he is not confident and not lucky.
If Cuthbert is not lucky, then Irvin is not good.
Someone is not worried if and only if he is bumpy.
Someone being not careful is equivalent to being not confident.
It can be concluded that Brooke is lucky once knowing that Fred is not careful.
Someone who is not worried is always good. | Griswald is worried. | contradiction |
Brooke is not lucky.
Irvin is not bumpy.
Otis is good.
Irvin is worried.
Fred is careful.
Brooke is not worried.
Griswald is not confident.
Otis is lucky.
Cuthbert is good.
Griswald is not worried.
Griswald is good.
Cuthbert is worried.If there is someone who is either not bumpy or not lucky, then Brooke is worried.
It can be concluded that Griswald is worried once knowing that Griswald is confident or Cuthbert is not lucky.
Someone who is not worried or not confident is always not bumpy and good.
If someone is not careful, then he is good, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Fred is lucky once knowing that Brooke is worried or Cuthbert is not good.
If there is at least one people who is lucky or confident, then Lincoln is not worried.
Someone is not worried and bumpy if and only if he is not confident and not lucky.
If Cuthbert is not lucky, then Irvin is not good.
Someone is not worried if and only if he is bumpy.
Someone being not careful is equivalent to being not confident.
It can be concluded that Brooke is lucky once knowing that Fred is not careful.
Someone who is not worried is always good. | Irvin is worried. | entailment |
Brooke is not lucky.
Irvin is not bumpy.
Otis is good.
Irvin is worried.
Fred is careful.
Brooke is not worried.
Griswald is not confident.
Otis is lucky.
Cuthbert is good.
Griswald is not worried.
Griswald is good.
Cuthbert is worried.If there is someone who is either not bumpy or not lucky, then Brooke is worried.
It can be concluded that Griswald is worried once knowing that Griswald is confident or Cuthbert is not lucky.
Someone who is not worried or not confident is always not bumpy and good.
If someone is not careful, then he is good, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Fred is lucky once knowing that Brooke is worried or Cuthbert is not good.
If there is at least one people who is lucky or confident, then Lincoln is not worried.
Someone is not worried and bumpy if and only if he is not confident and not lucky.
If Cuthbert is not lucky, then Irvin is not good.
Someone is not worried if and only if he is bumpy.
Someone being not careful is equivalent to being not confident.
It can be concluded that Brooke is lucky once knowing that Fred is not careful.
Someone who is not worried is always good. | Cuthbert is not confident. | entailment |
Brooke is not lucky.
Irvin is not bumpy.
Otis is good.
Irvin is worried.
Fred is careful.
Brooke is not worried.
Griswald is not confident.
Otis is lucky.
Cuthbert is good.
Griswald is not worried.
Griswald is good.
Cuthbert is worried.If there is someone who is either not bumpy or not lucky, then Brooke is worried.
It can be concluded that Griswald is worried once knowing that Griswald is confident or Cuthbert is not lucky.
Someone who is not worried or not confident is always not bumpy and good.
If someone is not careful, then he is good, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Fred is lucky once knowing that Brooke is worried or Cuthbert is not good.
If there is at least one people who is lucky or confident, then Lincoln is not worried.
Someone is not worried and bumpy if and only if he is not confident and not lucky.
If Cuthbert is not lucky, then Irvin is not good.
Someone is not worried if and only if he is bumpy.
Someone being not careful is equivalent to being not confident.
It can be concluded that Brooke is lucky once knowing that Fred is not careful.
Someone who is not worried is always good. | Fred is lucky. | entailment |
Brooke is not lucky.
Irvin is not bumpy.
Otis is good.
Irvin is worried.
Fred is careful.
Brooke is not worried.
Griswald is not confident.
Otis is lucky.
Cuthbert is good.
Griswald is not worried.
Griswald is good.
Cuthbert is worried.If there is someone who is either not bumpy or not lucky, then Brooke is worried.
It can be concluded that Griswald is worried once knowing that Griswald is confident or Cuthbert is not lucky.
Someone who is not worried or not confident is always not bumpy and good.
If someone is not careful, then he is good, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Fred is lucky once knowing that Brooke is worried or Cuthbert is not good.
If there is at least one people who is lucky or confident, then Lincoln is not worried.
Someone is not worried and bumpy if and only if he is not confident and not lucky.
If Cuthbert is not lucky, then Irvin is not good.
Someone is not worried if and only if he is bumpy.
Someone being not careful is equivalent to being not confident.
It can be concluded that Brooke is lucky once knowing that Fred is not careful.
Someone who is not worried is always good. | Griswald is not confident. | entailment |
Brooke is not lucky.
Irvin is not bumpy.
Otis is good.
Irvin is worried.
Fred is careful.
Brooke is not worried.
Griswald is not confident.
Otis is lucky.
Cuthbert is good.
Griswald is not worried.
Griswald is good.
Cuthbert is worried.If there is someone who is either not bumpy or not lucky, then Brooke is worried.
It can be concluded that Griswald is worried once knowing that Griswald is confident or Cuthbert is not lucky.
Someone who is not worried or not confident is always not bumpy and good.
If someone is not careful, then he is good, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Fred is lucky once knowing that Brooke is worried or Cuthbert is not good.
If there is at least one people who is lucky or confident, then Lincoln is not worried.
Someone is not worried and bumpy if and only if he is not confident and not lucky.
If Cuthbert is not lucky, then Irvin is not good.
Someone is not worried if and only if he is bumpy.
Someone being not careful is equivalent to being not confident.
It can be concluded that Brooke is lucky once knowing that Fred is not careful.
Someone who is not worried is always good. | Brooke is not bumpy. | self_contradiction |
Brooke is not lucky.
Irvin is not bumpy.
Otis is good.
Irvin is worried.
Fred is careful.
Brooke is not worried.
Griswald is not confident.
Otis is lucky.
Cuthbert is good.
Griswald is not worried.
Griswald is good.
Cuthbert is worried.If there is someone who is either not bumpy or not lucky, then Brooke is worried.
It can be concluded that Griswald is worried once knowing that Griswald is confident or Cuthbert is not lucky.
Someone who is not worried or not confident is always not bumpy and good.
If someone is not careful, then he is good, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Fred is lucky once knowing that Brooke is worried or Cuthbert is not good.
If there is at least one people who is lucky or confident, then Lincoln is not worried.
Someone is not worried and bumpy if and only if he is not confident and not lucky.
If Cuthbert is not lucky, then Irvin is not good.
Someone is not worried if and only if he is bumpy.
Someone being not careful is equivalent to being not confident.
It can be concluded that Brooke is lucky once knowing that Fred is not careful.
Someone who is not worried is always good. | Griswald is bumpy. | self_contradiction |
Brooke is not lucky.
Irvin is not bumpy.
Otis is good.
Irvin is worried.
Fred is careful.
Brooke is not worried.
Griswald is not confident.
Otis is lucky.
Cuthbert is good.
Griswald is not worried.
Griswald is good.
Cuthbert is worried.If there is someone who is either not bumpy or not lucky, then Brooke is worried.
It can be concluded that Griswald is worried once knowing that Griswald is confident or Cuthbert is not lucky.
Someone who is not worried or not confident is always not bumpy and good.
If someone is not careful, then he is good, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Fred is lucky once knowing that Brooke is worried or Cuthbert is not good.
If there is at least one people who is lucky or confident, then Lincoln is not worried.
Someone is not worried and bumpy if and only if he is not confident and not lucky.
If Cuthbert is not lucky, then Irvin is not good.
Someone is not worried if and only if he is bumpy.
Someone being not careful is equivalent to being not confident.
It can be concluded that Brooke is lucky once knowing that Fred is not careful.
Someone who is not worried is always good. | Irvin is not good. | neutral |
Brooke is not lucky.
Irvin is not bumpy.
Otis is good.
Irvin is worried.
Fred is careful.
Brooke is not worried.
Griswald is not confident.
Otis is lucky.
Cuthbert is good.
Griswald is not worried.
Griswald is good.
Cuthbert is worried.If there is someone who is either not bumpy or not lucky, then Brooke is worried.
It can be concluded that Griswald is worried once knowing that Griswald is confident or Cuthbert is not lucky.
Someone who is not worried or not confident is always not bumpy and good.
If someone is not careful, then he is good, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Fred is lucky once knowing that Brooke is worried or Cuthbert is not good.
If there is at least one people who is lucky or confident, then Lincoln is not worried.
Someone is not worried and bumpy if and only if he is not confident and not lucky.
If Cuthbert is not lucky, then Irvin is not good.
Someone is not worried if and only if he is bumpy.
Someone being not careful is equivalent to being not confident.
It can be concluded that Brooke is lucky once knowing that Fred is not careful.
Someone who is not worried is always good. | Otis is worried. | neutral |
Brooke is not lucky.
Irvin is not bumpy.
Otis is good.
Irvin is worried.
Fred is careful.
Brooke is not worried.
Griswald is not confident.
Otis is lucky.
Cuthbert is good.
Griswald is not worried.
Griswald is good.
Cuthbert is worried.If there is someone who is either not bumpy or not lucky, then Brooke is worried.
It can be concluded that Griswald is worried once knowing that Griswald is confident or Cuthbert is not lucky.
Someone who is not worried or not confident is always not bumpy and good.
If someone is not careful, then he is good, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Fred is lucky once knowing that Brooke is worried or Cuthbert is not good.
If there is at least one people who is lucky or confident, then Lincoln is not worried.
Someone is not worried and bumpy if and only if he is not confident and not lucky.
If Cuthbert is not lucky, then Irvin is not good.
Someone is not worried if and only if he is bumpy.
Someone being not careful is equivalent to being not confident.
It can be concluded that Brooke is lucky once knowing that Fred is not careful.
Someone who is not worried is always good. | Fred is good. | neutral |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.