premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Cuthbert is not right.
Kerwin is not embarrassed.
Sophie is not embarrassed.
Cuthbert is not embarrassed.
Cuthbert is boring.
Kerwin is right.
Brian is not boring.
Renfred is not delightful.
Kerwin is delightful.
Sophie is not boring.
Renfred is not acceptable.
Brian is embarrassed.Someone who is eithor not boring or neat is always not acceptable.
If someone is not embarrassed or he is not delightful, then he is acceptable.
Sophie being embarrassed and Cuthbert being right imply that Renfred is boring.
It can be concluded that Brian is not boring once knowing that Brian is delightful and Sophie is not neat.
If someone is embarrassed or he is delightful, then he is right.
Ridley being acceptable is equivalent to Brian being not right and Martin being embarrassed.
If someone is not embarrassed, then he is delightful.
If Brian is delightful, then Cuthbert is right.
If someone is delightful and neat, then he is right and acceptable.
If Kerwin is not acceptable and Brian is not neat, then Kerwin is not embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is right, then Martin is acceptable.
If someone is not neat or he is acceptable, then he is delightful. | Sophie is delightful. | entailment |
Cuthbert is not right.
Kerwin is not embarrassed.
Sophie is not embarrassed.
Cuthbert is not embarrassed.
Cuthbert is boring.
Kerwin is right.
Brian is not boring.
Renfred is not delightful.
Kerwin is delightful.
Sophie is not boring.
Renfred is not acceptable.
Brian is embarrassed.Someone who is eithor not boring or neat is always not acceptable.
If someone is not embarrassed or he is not delightful, then he is acceptable.
Sophie being embarrassed and Cuthbert being right imply that Renfred is boring.
It can be concluded that Brian is not boring once knowing that Brian is delightful and Sophie is not neat.
If someone is embarrassed or he is delightful, then he is right.
Ridley being acceptable is equivalent to Brian being not right and Martin being embarrassed.
If someone is not embarrassed, then he is delightful.
If Brian is delightful, then Cuthbert is right.
If someone is delightful and neat, then he is right and acceptable.
If Kerwin is not acceptable and Brian is not neat, then Kerwin is not embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is right, then Martin is acceptable.
If someone is not neat or he is acceptable, then he is delightful. | Ridley is delightful. | neutral |
Cuthbert is not right.
Kerwin is not embarrassed.
Sophie is not embarrassed.
Cuthbert is not embarrassed.
Cuthbert is boring.
Kerwin is right.
Brian is not boring.
Renfred is not delightful.
Kerwin is delightful.
Sophie is not boring.
Renfred is not acceptable.
Brian is embarrassed.Someone who is eithor not boring or neat is always not acceptable.
If someone is not embarrassed or he is not delightful, then he is acceptable.
Sophie being embarrassed and Cuthbert being right imply that Renfred is boring.
It can be concluded that Brian is not boring once knowing that Brian is delightful and Sophie is not neat.
If someone is embarrassed or he is delightful, then he is right.
Ridley being acceptable is equivalent to Brian being not right and Martin being embarrassed.
If someone is not embarrassed, then he is delightful.
If Brian is delightful, then Cuthbert is right.
If someone is delightful and neat, then he is right and acceptable.
If Kerwin is not acceptable and Brian is not neat, then Kerwin is not embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is right, then Martin is acceptable.
If someone is not neat or he is acceptable, then he is delightful. | Cuthbert is not embarrassed. | entailment |
Cuthbert is not right.
Kerwin is not embarrassed.
Sophie is not embarrassed.
Cuthbert is not embarrassed.
Cuthbert is boring.
Kerwin is right.
Brian is not boring.
Renfred is not delightful.
Kerwin is delightful.
Sophie is not boring.
Renfred is not acceptable.
Brian is embarrassed.Someone who is eithor not boring or neat is always not acceptable.
If someone is not embarrassed or he is not delightful, then he is acceptable.
Sophie being embarrassed and Cuthbert being right imply that Renfred is boring.
It can be concluded that Brian is not boring once knowing that Brian is delightful and Sophie is not neat.
If someone is embarrassed or he is delightful, then he is right.
Ridley being acceptable is equivalent to Brian being not right and Martin being embarrassed.
If someone is not embarrassed, then he is delightful.
If Brian is delightful, then Cuthbert is right.
If someone is delightful and neat, then he is right and acceptable.
If Kerwin is not acceptable and Brian is not neat, then Kerwin is not embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is right, then Martin is acceptable.
If someone is not neat or he is acceptable, then he is delightful. | Sophie is acceptable. | self_contradiction |
Cuthbert is not right.
Kerwin is not embarrassed.
Sophie is not embarrassed.
Cuthbert is not embarrassed.
Cuthbert is boring.
Kerwin is right.
Brian is not boring.
Renfred is not delightful.
Kerwin is delightful.
Sophie is not boring.
Renfred is not acceptable.
Brian is embarrassed.Someone who is eithor not boring or neat is always not acceptable.
If someone is not embarrassed or he is not delightful, then he is acceptable.
Sophie being embarrassed and Cuthbert being right imply that Renfred is boring.
It can be concluded that Brian is not boring once knowing that Brian is delightful and Sophie is not neat.
If someone is embarrassed or he is delightful, then he is right.
Ridley being acceptable is equivalent to Brian being not right and Martin being embarrassed.
If someone is not embarrassed, then he is delightful.
If Brian is delightful, then Cuthbert is right.
If someone is delightful and neat, then he is right and acceptable.
If Kerwin is not acceptable and Brian is not neat, then Kerwin is not embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is right, then Martin is acceptable.
If someone is not neat or he is acceptable, then he is delightful. | Sophie is boring. | contradiction |
Cuthbert is not right.
Kerwin is not embarrassed.
Sophie is not embarrassed.
Cuthbert is not embarrassed.
Cuthbert is boring.
Kerwin is right.
Brian is not boring.
Renfred is not delightful.
Kerwin is delightful.
Sophie is not boring.
Renfred is not acceptable.
Brian is embarrassed.Someone who is eithor not boring or neat is always not acceptable.
If someone is not embarrassed or he is not delightful, then he is acceptable.
Sophie being embarrassed and Cuthbert being right imply that Renfred is boring.
It can be concluded that Brian is not boring once knowing that Brian is delightful and Sophie is not neat.
If someone is embarrassed or he is delightful, then he is right.
Ridley being acceptable is equivalent to Brian being not right and Martin being embarrassed.
If someone is not embarrassed, then he is delightful.
If Brian is delightful, then Cuthbert is right.
If someone is delightful and neat, then he is right and acceptable.
If Kerwin is not acceptable and Brian is not neat, then Kerwin is not embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is right, then Martin is acceptable.
If someone is not neat or he is acceptable, then he is delightful. | Kerwin is not boring. | neutral |
Cuthbert is not right.
Kerwin is not embarrassed.
Sophie is not embarrassed.
Cuthbert is not embarrassed.
Cuthbert is boring.
Kerwin is right.
Brian is not boring.
Renfred is not delightful.
Kerwin is delightful.
Sophie is not boring.
Renfred is not acceptable.
Brian is embarrassed.Someone who is eithor not boring or neat is always not acceptable.
If someone is not embarrassed or he is not delightful, then he is acceptable.
Sophie being embarrassed and Cuthbert being right imply that Renfred is boring.
It can be concluded that Brian is not boring once knowing that Brian is delightful and Sophie is not neat.
If someone is embarrassed or he is delightful, then he is right.
Ridley being acceptable is equivalent to Brian being not right and Martin being embarrassed.
If someone is not embarrassed, then he is delightful.
If Brian is delightful, then Cuthbert is right.
If someone is delightful and neat, then he is right and acceptable.
If Kerwin is not acceptable and Brian is not neat, then Kerwin is not embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is right, then Martin is acceptable.
If someone is not neat or he is acceptable, then he is delightful. | Sophie is not neat. | neutral |
Cuthbert is not right.
Kerwin is not embarrassed.
Sophie is not embarrassed.
Cuthbert is not embarrassed.
Cuthbert is boring.
Kerwin is right.
Brian is not boring.
Renfred is not delightful.
Kerwin is delightful.
Sophie is not boring.
Renfred is not acceptable.
Brian is embarrassed.Someone who is eithor not boring or neat is always not acceptable.
If someone is not embarrassed or he is not delightful, then he is acceptable.
Sophie being embarrassed and Cuthbert being right imply that Renfred is boring.
It can be concluded that Brian is not boring once knowing that Brian is delightful and Sophie is not neat.
If someone is embarrassed or he is delightful, then he is right.
Ridley being acceptable is equivalent to Brian being not right and Martin being embarrassed.
If someone is not embarrassed, then he is delightful.
If Brian is delightful, then Cuthbert is right.
If someone is delightful and neat, then he is right and acceptable.
If Kerwin is not acceptable and Brian is not neat, then Kerwin is not embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is right, then Martin is acceptable.
If someone is not neat or he is acceptable, then he is delightful. | Ridley is not acceptable. | neutral |
Cuthbert is not right.
Kerwin is not embarrassed.
Sophie is not embarrassed.
Cuthbert is not embarrassed.
Cuthbert is boring.
Kerwin is right.
Brian is not boring.
Renfred is not delightful.
Kerwin is delightful.
Sophie is not boring.
Renfred is not acceptable.
Brian is embarrassed.Someone who is eithor not boring or neat is always not acceptable.
If someone is not embarrassed or he is not delightful, then he is acceptable.
Sophie being embarrassed and Cuthbert being right imply that Renfred is boring.
It can be concluded that Brian is not boring once knowing that Brian is delightful and Sophie is not neat.
If someone is embarrassed or he is delightful, then he is right.
Ridley being acceptable is equivalent to Brian being not right and Martin being embarrassed.
If someone is not embarrassed, then he is delightful.
If Brian is delightful, then Cuthbert is right.
If someone is delightful and neat, then he is right and acceptable.
If Kerwin is not acceptable and Brian is not neat, then Kerwin is not embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is right, then Martin is acceptable.
If someone is not neat or he is acceptable, then he is delightful. | Cuthbert is boring. | entailment |
Cuthbert is not right.
Kerwin is not embarrassed.
Sophie is not embarrassed.
Cuthbert is not embarrassed.
Cuthbert is boring.
Kerwin is right.
Brian is not boring.
Renfred is not delightful.
Kerwin is delightful.
Sophie is not boring.
Renfred is not acceptable.
Brian is embarrassed.Someone who is eithor not boring or neat is always not acceptable.
If someone is not embarrassed or he is not delightful, then he is acceptable.
Sophie being embarrassed and Cuthbert being right imply that Renfred is boring.
It can be concluded that Brian is not boring once knowing that Brian is delightful and Sophie is not neat.
If someone is embarrassed or he is delightful, then he is right.
Ridley being acceptable is equivalent to Brian being not right and Martin being embarrassed.
If someone is not embarrassed, then he is delightful.
If Brian is delightful, then Cuthbert is right.
If someone is delightful and neat, then he is right and acceptable.
If Kerwin is not acceptable and Brian is not neat, then Kerwin is not embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is right, then Martin is acceptable.
If someone is not neat or he is acceptable, then he is delightful. | Sophie is not boring. | entailment |
Cuthbert is not right.
Kerwin is not embarrassed.
Sophie is not embarrassed.
Cuthbert is not embarrassed.
Cuthbert is boring.
Kerwin is right.
Brian is not boring.
Renfred is not delightful.
Kerwin is delightful.
Sophie is not boring.
Renfred is not acceptable.
Brian is embarrassed.Someone who is eithor not boring or neat is always not acceptable.
If someone is not embarrassed or he is not delightful, then he is acceptable.
Sophie being embarrassed and Cuthbert being right imply that Renfred is boring.
It can be concluded that Brian is not boring once knowing that Brian is delightful and Sophie is not neat.
If someone is embarrassed or he is delightful, then he is right.
Ridley being acceptable is equivalent to Brian being not right and Martin being embarrassed.
If someone is not embarrassed, then he is delightful.
If Brian is delightful, then Cuthbert is right.
If someone is delightful and neat, then he is right and acceptable.
If Kerwin is not acceptable and Brian is not neat, then Kerwin is not embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is right, then Martin is acceptable.
If someone is not neat or he is acceptable, then he is delightful. | Martin is not delightful. | contradiction |
Cuthbert is not right.
Kerwin is not embarrassed.
Sophie is not embarrassed.
Cuthbert is not embarrassed.
Cuthbert is boring.
Kerwin is right.
Brian is not boring.
Renfred is not delightful.
Kerwin is delightful.
Sophie is not boring.
Renfred is not acceptable.
Brian is embarrassed.Someone who is eithor not boring or neat is always not acceptable.
If someone is not embarrassed or he is not delightful, then he is acceptable.
Sophie being embarrassed and Cuthbert being right imply that Renfred is boring.
It can be concluded that Brian is not boring once knowing that Brian is delightful and Sophie is not neat.
If someone is embarrassed or he is delightful, then he is right.
Ridley being acceptable is equivalent to Brian being not right and Martin being embarrassed.
If someone is not embarrassed, then he is delightful.
If Brian is delightful, then Cuthbert is right.
If someone is delightful and neat, then he is right and acceptable.
If Kerwin is not acceptable and Brian is not neat, then Kerwin is not embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is right, then Martin is acceptable.
If someone is not neat or he is acceptable, then he is delightful. | Sophie is not embarrassed. | entailment |
Cuthbert is not right.
Kerwin is not embarrassed.
Sophie is not embarrassed.
Cuthbert is not embarrassed.
Cuthbert is boring.
Kerwin is right.
Brian is not boring.
Renfred is not delightful.
Kerwin is delightful.
Sophie is not boring.
Renfred is not acceptable.
Brian is embarrassed.Someone who is eithor not boring or neat is always not acceptable.
If someone is not embarrassed or he is not delightful, then he is acceptable.
Sophie being embarrassed and Cuthbert being right imply that Renfred is boring.
It can be concluded that Brian is not boring once knowing that Brian is delightful and Sophie is not neat.
If someone is embarrassed or he is delightful, then he is right.
Ridley being acceptable is equivalent to Brian being not right and Martin being embarrassed.
If someone is not embarrassed, then he is delightful.
If Brian is delightful, then Cuthbert is right.
If someone is delightful and neat, then he is right and acceptable.
If Kerwin is not acceptable and Brian is not neat, then Kerwin is not embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is right, then Martin is acceptable.
If someone is not neat or he is acceptable, then he is delightful. | Sophie is not delightful. | contradiction |
Cuthbert is not right.
Kerwin is not embarrassed.
Sophie is not embarrassed.
Cuthbert is not embarrassed.
Cuthbert is boring.
Kerwin is right.
Brian is not boring.
Renfred is not delightful.
Kerwin is delightful.
Sophie is not boring.
Renfred is not acceptable.
Brian is embarrassed.Someone who is eithor not boring or neat is always not acceptable.
If someone is not embarrassed or he is not delightful, then he is acceptable.
Sophie being embarrassed and Cuthbert being right imply that Renfred is boring.
It can be concluded that Brian is not boring once knowing that Brian is delightful and Sophie is not neat.
If someone is embarrassed or he is delightful, then he is right.
Ridley being acceptable is equivalent to Brian being not right and Martin being embarrassed.
If someone is not embarrassed, then he is delightful.
If Brian is delightful, then Cuthbert is right.
If someone is delightful and neat, then he is right and acceptable.
If Kerwin is not acceptable and Brian is not neat, then Kerwin is not embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is right, then Martin is acceptable.
If someone is not neat or he is acceptable, then he is delightful. | Renfred is not embarrassed. | neutral |
Cuthbert is not right.
Kerwin is not embarrassed.
Sophie is not embarrassed.
Cuthbert is not embarrassed.
Cuthbert is boring.
Kerwin is right.
Brian is not boring.
Renfred is not delightful.
Kerwin is delightful.
Sophie is not boring.
Renfred is not acceptable.
Brian is embarrassed.Someone who is eithor not boring or neat is always not acceptable.
If someone is not embarrassed or he is not delightful, then he is acceptable.
Sophie being embarrassed and Cuthbert being right imply that Renfred is boring.
It can be concluded that Brian is not boring once knowing that Brian is delightful and Sophie is not neat.
If someone is embarrassed or he is delightful, then he is right.
Ridley being acceptable is equivalent to Brian being not right and Martin being embarrassed.
If someone is not embarrassed, then he is delightful.
If Brian is delightful, then Cuthbert is right.
If someone is delightful and neat, then he is right and acceptable.
If Kerwin is not acceptable and Brian is not neat, then Kerwin is not embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is right, then Martin is acceptable.
If someone is not neat or he is acceptable, then he is delightful. | Sophie is not right. | contradiction |
Cuthbert is not right.
Kerwin is not embarrassed.
Sophie is not embarrassed.
Cuthbert is not embarrassed.
Cuthbert is boring.
Kerwin is right.
Brian is not boring.
Renfred is not delightful.
Kerwin is delightful.
Sophie is not boring.
Renfred is not acceptable.
Brian is embarrassed.Someone who is eithor not boring or neat is always not acceptable.
If someone is not embarrassed or he is not delightful, then he is acceptable.
Sophie being embarrassed and Cuthbert being right imply that Renfred is boring.
It can be concluded that Brian is not boring once knowing that Brian is delightful and Sophie is not neat.
If someone is embarrassed or he is delightful, then he is right.
Ridley being acceptable is equivalent to Brian being not right and Martin being embarrassed.
If someone is not embarrassed, then he is delightful.
If Brian is delightful, then Cuthbert is right.
If someone is delightful and neat, then he is right and acceptable.
If Kerwin is not acceptable and Brian is not neat, then Kerwin is not embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is right, then Martin is acceptable.
If someone is not neat or he is acceptable, then he is delightful. | Renfred is delightful. | self_contradiction |
Cuthbert is not right.
Kerwin is not embarrassed.
Sophie is not embarrassed.
Cuthbert is not embarrassed.
Cuthbert is boring.
Kerwin is right.
Brian is not boring.
Renfred is not delightful.
Kerwin is delightful.
Sophie is not boring.
Renfred is not acceptable.
Brian is embarrassed.Someone who is eithor not boring or neat is always not acceptable.
If someone is not embarrassed or he is not delightful, then he is acceptable.
Sophie being embarrassed and Cuthbert being right imply that Renfred is boring.
It can be concluded that Brian is not boring once knowing that Brian is delightful and Sophie is not neat.
If someone is embarrassed or he is delightful, then he is right.
Ridley being acceptable is equivalent to Brian being not right and Martin being embarrassed.
If someone is not embarrassed, then he is delightful.
If Brian is delightful, then Cuthbert is right.
If someone is delightful and neat, then he is right and acceptable.
If Kerwin is not acceptable and Brian is not neat, then Kerwin is not embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is right, then Martin is acceptable.
If someone is not neat or he is acceptable, then he is delightful. | Renfred is not acceptable. | self_contradiction |
Cuthbert is not right.
Kerwin is not embarrassed.
Sophie is not embarrassed.
Cuthbert is not embarrassed.
Cuthbert is boring.
Kerwin is right.
Brian is not boring.
Renfred is not delightful.
Kerwin is delightful.
Sophie is not boring.
Renfred is not acceptable.
Brian is embarrassed.Someone who is eithor not boring or neat is always not acceptable.
If someone is not embarrassed or he is not delightful, then he is acceptable.
Sophie being embarrassed and Cuthbert being right imply that Renfred is boring.
It can be concluded that Brian is not boring once knowing that Brian is delightful and Sophie is not neat.
If someone is embarrassed or he is delightful, then he is right.
Ridley being acceptable is equivalent to Brian being not right and Martin being embarrassed.
If someone is not embarrassed, then he is delightful.
If Brian is delightful, then Cuthbert is right.
If someone is delightful and neat, then he is right and acceptable.
If Kerwin is not acceptable and Brian is not neat, then Kerwin is not embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is right, then Martin is acceptable.
If someone is not neat or he is acceptable, then he is delightful. | Kerwin is not right. | contradiction |
Cuthbert is not right.
Kerwin is not embarrassed.
Sophie is not embarrassed.
Cuthbert is not embarrassed.
Cuthbert is boring.
Kerwin is right.
Brian is not boring.
Renfred is not delightful.
Kerwin is delightful.
Sophie is not boring.
Renfred is not acceptable.
Brian is embarrassed.Someone who is eithor not boring or neat is always not acceptable.
If someone is not embarrassed or he is not delightful, then he is acceptable.
Sophie being embarrassed and Cuthbert being right imply that Renfred is boring.
It can be concluded that Brian is not boring once knowing that Brian is delightful and Sophie is not neat.
If someone is embarrassed or he is delightful, then he is right.
Ridley being acceptable is equivalent to Brian being not right and Martin being embarrassed.
If someone is not embarrassed, then he is delightful.
If Brian is delightful, then Cuthbert is right.
If someone is delightful and neat, then he is right and acceptable.
If Kerwin is not acceptable and Brian is not neat, then Kerwin is not embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is right, then Martin is acceptable.
If someone is not neat or he is acceptable, then he is delightful. | Renfred is not delightful. | self_contradiction |
Cuthbert is not right.
Kerwin is not embarrassed.
Sophie is not embarrassed.
Cuthbert is not embarrassed.
Cuthbert is boring.
Kerwin is right.
Brian is not boring.
Renfred is not delightful.
Kerwin is delightful.
Sophie is not boring.
Renfred is not acceptable.
Brian is embarrassed.Someone who is eithor not boring or neat is always not acceptable.
If someone is not embarrassed or he is not delightful, then he is acceptable.
Sophie being embarrassed and Cuthbert being right imply that Renfred is boring.
It can be concluded that Brian is not boring once knowing that Brian is delightful and Sophie is not neat.
If someone is embarrassed or he is delightful, then he is right.
Ridley being acceptable is equivalent to Brian being not right and Martin being embarrassed.
If someone is not embarrassed, then he is delightful.
If Brian is delightful, then Cuthbert is right.
If someone is delightful and neat, then he is right and acceptable.
If Kerwin is not acceptable and Brian is not neat, then Kerwin is not embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is right, then Martin is acceptable.
If someone is not neat or he is acceptable, then he is delightful. | Cuthbert is right. | self_contradiction |
Raymond is thoughtful.
Clifford is critical.
Clifford is not strict.
Boris is not critical.
Clifford is thoughtful.
Beverly is not strict.
Avery is sharp.
Boris is large.
Danna is critical.
Gemma is strict.
Avery is motionless.
Gemma is thoughtful.If there is at least one people who is both strict and large, then Avery is critical.
Avery being not critical or Gemma being not motionless implies that Beverly is sharp.
Someone is not motionless and not strict if and only if he is sharp.
Beverly being not motionless and Danna being not sharp imply that Avery is thoughtful.
All large people are sharp.
Someone is large if and only if he is not thoughtful.
If someone is both not sharp and not motionless, then he is critical.
Someone is sharp if and only if he is not critical.
Clifford being strict is equivalent to Boris being large and Beverly being not thoughtful.
If there is someone who is not strict, then Clifford is not critical and Danna is large.
Avery being large implies that Gemma is strict and Gemma is motionless.
If there is someone who is strict, then Beverly is not thoughtful. | Danna is not sharp. | contradiction |
Raymond is thoughtful.
Clifford is critical.
Clifford is not strict.
Boris is not critical.
Clifford is thoughtful.
Beverly is not strict.
Avery is sharp.
Boris is large.
Danna is critical.
Gemma is strict.
Avery is motionless.
Gemma is thoughtful.If there is at least one people who is both strict and large, then Avery is critical.
Avery being not critical or Gemma being not motionless implies that Beverly is sharp.
Someone is not motionless and not strict if and only if he is sharp.
Beverly being not motionless and Danna being not sharp imply that Avery is thoughtful.
All large people are sharp.
Someone is large if and only if he is not thoughtful.
If someone is both not sharp and not motionless, then he is critical.
Someone is sharp if and only if he is not critical.
Clifford being strict is equivalent to Boris being large and Beverly being not thoughtful.
If there is someone who is not strict, then Clifford is not critical and Danna is large.
Avery being large implies that Gemma is strict and Gemma is motionless.
If there is someone who is strict, then Beverly is not thoughtful. | Boris is sharp. | entailment |
Raymond is thoughtful.
Clifford is critical.
Clifford is not strict.
Boris is not critical.
Clifford is thoughtful.
Beverly is not strict.
Avery is sharp.
Boris is large.
Danna is critical.
Gemma is strict.
Avery is motionless.
Gemma is thoughtful.If there is at least one people who is both strict and large, then Avery is critical.
Avery being not critical or Gemma being not motionless implies that Beverly is sharp.
Someone is not motionless and not strict if and only if he is sharp.
Beverly being not motionless and Danna being not sharp imply that Avery is thoughtful.
All large people are sharp.
Someone is large if and only if he is not thoughtful.
If someone is both not sharp and not motionless, then he is critical.
Someone is sharp if and only if he is not critical.
Clifford being strict is equivalent to Boris being large and Beverly being not thoughtful.
If there is someone who is not strict, then Clifford is not critical and Danna is large.
Avery being large implies that Gemma is strict and Gemma is motionless.
If there is someone who is strict, then Beverly is not thoughtful. | Boris is not critical. | entailment |
Raymond is thoughtful.
Clifford is critical.
Clifford is not strict.
Boris is not critical.
Clifford is thoughtful.
Beverly is not strict.
Avery is sharp.
Boris is large.
Danna is critical.
Gemma is strict.
Avery is motionless.
Gemma is thoughtful.If there is at least one people who is both strict and large, then Avery is critical.
Avery being not critical or Gemma being not motionless implies that Beverly is sharp.
Someone is not motionless and not strict if and only if he is sharp.
Beverly being not motionless and Danna being not sharp imply that Avery is thoughtful.
All large people are sharp.
Someone is large if and only if he is not thoughtful.
If someone is both not sharp and not motionless, then he is critical.
Someone is sharp if and only if he is not critical.
Clifford being strict is equivalent to Boris being large and Beverly being not thoughtful.
If there is someone who is not strict, then Clifford is not critical and Danna is large.
Avery being large implies that Gemma is strict and Gemma is motionless.
If there is someone who is strict, then Beverly is not thoughtful. | Raymond is sharp. | neutral |
Raymond is thoughtful.
Clifford is critical.
Clifford is not strict.
Boris is not critical.
Clifford is thoughtful.
Beverly is not strict.
Avery is sharp.
Boris is large.
Danna is critical.
Gemma is strict.
Avery is motionless.
Gemma is thoughtful.If there is at least one people who is both strict and large, then Avery is critical.
Avery being not critical or Gemma being not motionless implies that Beverly is sharp.
Someone is not motionless and not strict if and only if he is sharp.
Beverly being not motionless and Danna being not sharp imply that Avery is thoughtful.
All large people are sharp.
Someone is large if and only if he is not thoughtful.
If someone is both not sharp and not motionless, then he is critical.
Someone is sharp if and only if he is not critical.
Clifford being strict is equivalent to Boris being large and Beverly being not thoughtful.
If there is someone who is not strict, then Clifford is not critical and Danna is large.
Avery being large implies that Gemma is strict and Gemma is motionless.
If there is someone who is strict, then Beverly is not thoughtful. | Clifford is not critical. | self_contradiction |
Raymond is thoughtful.
Clifford is critical.
Clifford is not strict.
Boris is not critical.
Clifford is thoughtful.
Beverly is not strict.
Avery is sharp.
Boris is large.
Danna is critical.
Gemma is strict.
Avery is motionless.
Gemma is thoughtful.If there is at least one people who is both strict and large, then Avery is critical.
Avery being not critical or Gemma being not motionless implies that Beverly is sharp.
Someone is not motionless and not strict if and only if he is sharp.
Beverly being not motionless and Danna being not sharp imply that Avery is thoughtful.
All large people are sharp.
Someone is large if and only if he is not thoughtful.
If someone is both not sharp and not motionless, then he is critical.
Someone is sharp if and only if he is not critical.
Clifford being strict is equivalent to Boris being large and Beverly being not thoughtful.
If there is someone who is not strict, then Clifford is not critical and Danna is large.
Avery being large implies that Gemma is strict and Gemma is motionless.
If there is someone who is strict, then Beverly is not thoughtful. | Danna is strict. | contradiction |
Raymond is thoughtful.
Clifford is critical.
Clifford is not strict.
Boris is not critical.
Clifford is thoughtful.
Beverly is not strict.
Avery is sharp.
Boris is large.
Danna is critical.
Gemma is strict.
Avery is motionless.
Gemma is thoughtful.If there is at least one people who is both strict and large, then Avery is critical.
Avery being not critical or Gemma being not motionless implies that Beverly is sharp.
Someone is not motionless and not strict if and only if he is sharp.
Beverly being not motionless and Danna being not sharp imply that Avery is thoughtful.
All large people are sharp.
Someone is large if and only if he is not thoughtful.
If someone is both not sharp and not motionless, then he is critical.
Someone is sharp if and only if he is not critical.
Clifford being strict is equivalent to Boris being large and Beverly being not thoughtful.
If there is someone who is not strict, then Clifford is not critical and Danna is large.
Avery being large implies that Gemma is strict and Gemma is motionless.
If there is someone who is strict, then Beverly is not thoughtful. | Avery is not strict. | entailment |
Raymond is thoughtful.
Clifford is critical.
Clifford is not strict.
Boris is not critical.
Clifford is thoughtful.
Beverly is not strict.
Avery is sharp.
Boris is large.
Danna is critical.
Gemma is strict.
Avery is motionless.
Gemma is thoughtful.If there is at least one people who is both strict and large, then Avery is critical.
Avery being not critical or Gemma being not motionless implies that Beverly is sharp.
Someone is not motionless and not strict if and only if he is sharp.
Beverly being not motionless and Danna being not sharp imply that Avery is thoughtful.
All large people are sharp.
Someone is large if and only if he is not thoughtful.
If someone is both not sharp and not motionless, then he is critical.
Someone is sharp if and only if he is not critical.
Clifford being strict is equivalent to Boris being large and Beverly being not thoughtful.
If there is someone who is not strict, then Clifford is not critical and Danna is large.
Avery being large implies that Gemma is strict and Gemma is motionless.
If there is someone who is strict, then Beverly is not thoughtful. | Raymond is large. | neutral |
Raymond is thoughtful.
Clifford is critical.
Clifford is not strict.
Boris is not critical.
Clifford is thoughtful.
Beverly is not strict.
Avery is sharp.
Boris is large.
Danna is critical.
Gemma is strict.
Avery is motionless.
Gemma is thoughtful.If there is at least one people who is both strict and large, then Avery is critical.
Avery being not critical or Gemma being not motionless implies that Beverly is sharp.
Someone is not motionless and not strict if and only if he is sharp.
Beverly being not motionless and Danna being not sharp imply that Avery is thoughtful.
All large people are sharp.
Someone is large if and only if he is not thoughtful.
If someone is both not sharp and not motionless, then he is critical.
Someone is sharp if and only if he is not critical.
Clifford being strict is equivalent to Boris being large and Beverly being not thoughtful.
If there is someone who is not strict, then Clifford is not critical and Danna is large.
Avery being large implies that Gemma is strict and Gemma is motionless.
If there is someone who is strict, then Beverly is not thoughtful. | Beverly is not motionless. | entailment |
Raymond is thoughtful.
Clifford is critical.
Clifford is not strict.
Boris is not critical.
Clifford is thoughtful.
Beverly is not strict.
Avery is sharp.
Boris is large.
Danna is critical.
Gemma is strict.
Avery is motionless.
Gemma is thoughtful.If there is at least one people who is both strict and large, then Avery is critical.
Avery being not critical or Gemma being not motionless implies that Beverly is sharp.
Someone is not motionless and not strict if and only if he is sharp.
Beverly being not motionless and Danna being not sharp imply that Avery is thoughtful.
All large people are sharp.
Someone is large if and only if he is not thoughtful.
If someone is both not sharp and not motionless, then he is critical.
Someone is sharp if and only if he is not critical.
Clifford being strict is equivalent to Boris being large and Beverly being not thoughtful.
If there is someone who is not strict, then Clifford is not critical and Danna is large.
Avery being large implies that Gemma is strict and Gemma is motionless.
If there is someone who is strict, then Beverly is not thoughtful. | Clifford is not strict. | self_contradiction |
Raymond is thoughtful.
Clifford is critical.
Clifford is not strict.
Boris is not critical.
Clifford is thoughtful.
Beverly is not strict.
Avery is sharp.
Boris is large.
Danna is critical.
Gemma is strict.
Avery is motionless.
Gemma is thoughtful.If there is at least one people who is both strict and large, then Avery is critical.
Avery being not critical or Gemma being not motionless implies that Beverly is sharp.
Someone is not motionless and not strict if and only if he is sharp.
Beverly being not motionless and Danna being not sharp imply that Avery is thoughtful.
All large people are sharp.
Someone is large if and only if he is not thoughtful.
If someone is both not sharp and not motionless, then he is critical.
Someone is sharp if and only if he is not critical.
Clifford being strict is equivalent to Boris being large and Beverly being not thoughtful.
If there is someone who is not strict, then Clifford is not critical and Danna is large.
Avery being large implies that Gemma is strict and Gemma is motionless.
If there is someone who is strict, then Beverly is not thoughtful. | Raymond is not large. | neutral |
Raymond is thoughtful.
Clifford is critical.
Clifford is not strict.
Boris is not critical.
Clifford is thoughtful.
Beverly is not strict.
Avery is sharp.
Boris is large.
Danna is critical.
Gemma is strict.
Avery is motionless.
Gemma is thoughtful.If there is at least one people who is both strict and large, then Avery is critical.
Avery being not critical or Gemma being not motionless implies that Beverly is sharp.
Someone is not motionless and not strict if and only if he is sharp.
Beverly being not motionless and Danna being not sharp imply that Avery is thoughtful.
All large people are sharp.
Someone is large if and only if he is not thoughtful.
If someone is both not sharp and not motionless, then he is critical.
Someone is sharp if and only if he is not critical.
Clifford being strict is equivalent to Boris being large and Beverly being not thoughtful.
If there is someone who is not strict, then Clifford is not critical and Danna is large.
Avery being large implies that Gemma is strict and Gemma is motionless.
If there is someone who is strict, then Beverly is not thoughtful. | Danna is not critical. | self_contradiction |
Raymond is thoughtful.
Clifford is critical.
Clifford is not strict.
Boris is not critical.
Clifford is thoughtful.
Beverly is not strict.
Avery is sharp.
Boris is large.
Danna is critical.
Gemma is strict.
Avery is motionless.
Gemma is thoughtful.If there is at least one people who is both strict and large, then Avery is critical.
Avery being not critical or Gemma being not motionless implies that Beverly is sharp.
Someone is not motionless and not strict if and only if he is sharp.
Beverly being not motionless and Danna being not sharp imply that Avery is thoughtful.
All large people are sharp.
Someone is large if and only if he is not thoughtful.
If someone is both not sharp and not motionless, then he is critical.
Someone is sharp if and only if he is not critical.
Clifford being strict is equivalent to Boris being large and Beverly being not thoughtful.
If there is someone who is not strict, then Clifford is not critical and Danna is large.
Avery being large implies that Gemma is strict and Gemma is motionless.
If there is someone who is strict, then Beverly is not thoughtful. | Beverly is large. | entailment |
Raymond is thoughtful.
Clifford is critical.
Clifford is not strict.
Boris is not critical.
Clifford is thoughtful.
Beverly is not strict.
Avery is sharp.
Boris is large.
Danna is critical.
Gemma is strict.
Avery is motionless.
Gemma is thoughtful.If there is at least one people who is both strict and large, then Avery is critical.
Avery being not critical or Gemma being not motionless implies that Beverly is sharp.
Someone is not motionless and not strict if and only if he is sharp.
Beverly being not motionless and Danna being not sharp imply that Avery is thoughtful.
All large people are sharp.
Someone is large if and only if he is not thoughtful.
If someone is both not sharp and not motionless, then he is critical.
Someone is sharp if and only if he is not critical.
Clifford being strict is equivalent to Boris being large and Beverly being not thoughtful.
If there is someone who is not strict, then Clifford is not critical and Danna is large.
Avery being large implies that Gemma is strict and Gemma is motionless.
If there is someone who is strict, then Beverly is not thoughtful. | Danna is motionless. | contradiction |
Raymond is thoughtful.
Clifford is critical.
Clifford is not strict.
Boris is not critical.
Clifford is thoughtful.
Beverly is not strict.
Avery is sharp.
Boris is large.
Danna is critical.
Gemma is strict.
Avery is motionless.
Gemma is thoughtful.If there is at least one people who is both strict and large, then Avery is critical.
Avery being not critical or Gemma being not motionless implies that Beverly is sharp.
Someone is not motionless and not strict if and only if he is sharp.
Beverly being not motionless and Danna being not sharp imply that Avery is thoughtful.
All large people are sharp.
Someone is large if and only if he is not thoughtful.
If someone is both not sharp and not motionless, then he is critical.
Someone is sharp if and only if he is not critical.
Clifford being strict is equivalent to Boris being large and Beverly being not thoughtful.
If there is someone who is not strict, then Clifford is not critical and Danna is large.
Avery being large implies that Gemma is strict and Gemma is motionless.
If there is someone who is strict, then Beverly is not thoughtful. | Raymond is critical. | neutral |
Raymond is thoughtful.
Clifford is critical.
Clifford is not strict.
Boris is not critical.
Clifford is thoughtful.
Beverly is not strict.
Avery is sharp.
Boris is large.
Danna is critical.
Gemma is strict.
Avery is motionless.
Gemma is thoughtful.If there is at least one people who is both strict and large, then Avery is critical.
Avery being not critical or Gemma being not motionless implies that Beverly is sharp.
Someone is not motionless and not strict if and only if he is sharp.
Beverly being not motionless and Danna being not sharp imply that Avery is thoughtful.
All large people are sharp.
Someone is large if and only if he is not thoughtful.
If someone is both not sharp and not motionless, then he is critical.
Someone is sharp if and only if he is not critical.
Clifford being strict is equivalent to Boris being large and Beverly being not thoughtful.
If there is someone who is not strict, then Clifford is not critical and Danna is large.
Avery being large implies that Gemma is strict and Gemma is motionless.
If there is someone who is strict, then Beverly is not thoughtful. | Danna is critical. | self_contradiction |
Raymond is thoughtful.
Clifford is critical.
Clifford is not strict.
Boris is not critical.
Clifford is thoughtful.
Beverly is not strict.
Avery is sharp.
Boris is large.
Danna is critical.
Gemma is strict.
Avery is motionless.
Gemma is thoughtful.If there is at least one people who is both strict and large, then Avery is critical.
Avery being not critical or Gemma being not motionless implies that Beverly is sharp.
Someone is not motionless and not strict if and only if he is sharp.
Beverly being not motionless and Danna being not sharp imply that Avery is thoughtful.
All large people are sharp.
Someone is large if and only if he is not thoughtful.
If someone is both not sharp and not motionless, then he is critical.
Someone is sharp if and only if he is not critical.
Clifford being strict is equivalent to Boris being large and Beverly being not thoughtful.
If there is someone who is not strict, then Clifford is not critical and Danna is large.
Avery being large implies that Gemma is strict and Gemma is motionless.
If there is someone who is strict, then Beverly is not thoughtful. | Clifford is strict. | self_contradiction |
Raymond is thoughtful.
Clifford is critical.
Clifford is not strict.
Boris is not critical.
Clifford is thoughtful.
Beverly is not strict.
Avery is sharp.
Boris is large.
Danna is critical.
Gemma is strict.
Avery is motionless.
Gemma is thoughtful.If there is at least one people who is both strict and large, then Avery is critical.
Avery being not critical or Gemma being not motionless implies that Beverly is sharp.
Someone is not motionless and not strict if and only if he is sharp.
Beverly being not motionless and Danna being not sharp imply that Avery is thoughtful.
All large people are sharp.
Someone is large if and only if he is not thoughtful.
If someone is both not sharp and not motionless, then he is critical.
Someone is sharp if and only if he is not critical.
Clifford being strict is equivalent to Boris being large and Beverly being not thoughtful.
If there is someone who is not strict, then Clifford is not critical and Danna is large.
Avery being large implies that Gemma is strict and Gemma is motionless.
If there is someone who is strict, then Beverly is not thoughtful. | Beverly is not sharp. | contradiction |
Raymond is thoughtful.
Clifford is critical.
Clifford is not strict.
Boris is not critical.
Clifford is thoughtful.
Beverly is not strict.
Avery is sharp.
Boris is large.
Danna is critical.
Gemma is strict.
Avery is motionless.
Gemma is thoughtful.If there is at least one people who is both strict and large, then Avery is critical.
Avery being not critical or Gemma being not motionless implies that Beverly is sharp.
Someone is not motionless and not strict if and only if he is sharp.
Beverly being not motionless and Danna being not sharp imply that Avery is thoughtful.
All large people are sharp.
Someone is large if and only if he is not thoughtful.
If someone is both not sharp and not motionless, then he is critical.
Someone is sharp if and only if he is not critical.
Clifford being strict is equivalent to Boris being large and Beverly being not thoughtful.
If there is someone who is not strict, then Clifford is not critical and Danna is large.
Avery being large implies that Gemma is strict and Gemma is motionless.
If there is someone who is strict, then Beverly is not thoughtful. | Gemma is large. | neutral |
Raymond is thoughtful.
Clifford is critical.
Clifford is not strict.
Boris is not critical.
Clifford is thoughtful.
Beverly is not strict.
Avery is sharp.
Boris is large.
Danna is critical.
Gemma is strict.
Avery is motionless.
Gemma is thoughtful.If there is at least one people who is both strict and large, then Avery is critical.
Avery being not critical or Gemma being not motionless implies that Beverly is sharp.
Someone is not motionless and not strict if and only if he is sharp.
Beverly being not motionless and Danna being not sharp imply that Avery is thoughtful.
All large people are sharp.
Someone is large if and only if he is not thoughtful.
If someone is both not sharp and not motionless, then he is critical.
Someone is sharp if and only if he is not critical.
Clifford being strict is equivalent to Boris being large and Beverly being not thoughtful.
If there is someone who is not strict, then Clifford is not critical and Danna is large.
Avery being large implies that Gemma is strict and Gemma is motionless.
If there is someone who is strict, then Beverly is not thoughtful. | Boris is thoughtful. | contradiction |
Arlen is self-disciplined.
Bud is annoyed.
Randolph is not wrong.
Jorge is not conscientious.
Chrysta is tired.
Bud is not conscientious.
Lars is not tremendous.
Lars is not conscientious.
Claude is conscientious.
Arlen is conscientious.
Claude is not annoyed.
Randolph is not conscientious.If there is at least one people who is conscientious or not wrong, then Arlen is not tired.
Someone who is self-disciplined is always tremendous.
If there is someone who is both conscientious and self-disciplined, then Jorge is not tremendous.
If someone who is annoyed is also tremendous, then he is wrong.
Bud being not annoyed and Jorge being not wrong imply that Chrysta is not conscientious.
If someone is not self-disciplined and tired, then he is conscientious, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is tremendous, then Arlen is conscientious.
Someone who is not self-disciplined is always not tremendous.
If there is someone who is annoyed, then Bud is tired.
Randolph being wrong is equivalent to Chrysta being not tired.
Someone is self-disciplined if and only if he is not tremendous.
If someone is tremendous or not wrong, then he is self-disciplined. | Bud is not annoyed. | contradiction |
Arlen is self-disciplined.
Bud is annoyed.
Randolph is not wrong.
Jorge is not conscientious.
Chrysta is tired.
Bud is not conscientious.
Lars is not tremendous.
Lars is not conscientious.
Claude is conscientious.
Arlen is conscientious.
Claude is not annoyed.
Randolph is not conscientious.If there is at least one people who is conscientious or not wrong, then Arlen is not tired.
Someone who is self-disciplined is always tremendous.
If there is someone who is both conscientious and self-disciplined, then Jorge is not tremendous.
If someone who is annoyed is also tremendous, then he is wrong.
Bud being not annoyed and Jorge being not wrong imply that Chrysta is not conscientious.
If someone is not self-disciplined and tired, then he is conscientious, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is tremendous, then Arlen is conscientious.
Someone who is not self-disciplined is always not tremendous.
If there is someone who is annoyed, then Bud is tired.
Randolph being wrong is equivalent to Chrysta being not tired.
Someone is self-disciplined if and only if he is not tremendous.
If someone is tremendous or not wrong, then he is self-disciplined. | Jorge is not tremendous. | self_contradiction |
Arlen is self-disciplined.
Bud is annoyed.
Randolph is not wrong.
Jorge is not conscientious.
Chrysta is tired.
Bud is not conscientious.
Lars is not tremendous.
Lars is not conscientious.
Claude is conscientious.
Arlen is conscientious.
Claude is not annoyed.
Randolph is not conscientious.If there is at least one people who is conscientious or not wrong, then Arlen is not tired.
Someone who is self-disciplined is always tremendous.
If there is someone who is both conscientious and self-disciplined, then Jorge is not tremendous.
If someone who is annoyed is also tremendous, then he is wrong.
Bud being not annoyed and Jorge being not wrong imply that Chrysta is not conscientious.
If someone is not self-disciplined and tired, then he is conscientious, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is tremendous, then Arlen is conscientious.
Someone who is not self-disciplined is always not tremendous.
If there is someone who is annoyed, then Bud is tired.
Randolph being wrong is equivalent to Chrysta being not tired.
Someone is self-disciplined if and only if he is not tremendous.
If someone is tremendous or not wrong, then he is self-disciplined. | Randolph is not annoyed. | neutral |
Arlen is self-disciplined.
Bud is annoyed.
Randolph is not wrong.
Jorge is not conscientious.
Chrysta is tired.
Bud is not conscientious.
Lars is not tremendous.
Lars is not conscientious.
Claude is conscientious.
Arlen is conscientious.
Claude is not annoyed.
Randolph is not conscientious.If there is at least one people who is conscientious or not wrong, then Arlen is not tired.
Someone who is self-disciplined is always tremendous.
If there is someone who is both conscientious and self-disciplined, then Jorge is not tremendous.
If someone who is annoyed is also tremendous, then he is wrong.
Bud being not annoyed and Jorge being not wrong imply that Chrysta is not conscientious.
If someone is not self-disciplined and tired, then he is conscientious, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is tremendous, then Arlen is conscientious.
Someone who is not self-disciplined is always not tremendous.
If there is someone who is annoyed, then Bud is tired.
Randolph being wrong is equivalent to Chrysta being not tired.
Someone is self-disciplined if and only if he is not tremendous.
If someone is tremendous or not wrong, then he is self-disciplined. | Arlen is conscientious. | entailment |
Arlen is self-disciplined.
Bud is annoyed.
Randolph is not wrong.
Jorge is not conscientious.
Chrysta is tired.
Bud is not conscientious.
Lars is not tremendous.
Lars is not conscientious.
Claude is conscientious.
Arlen is conscientious.
Claude is not annoyed.
Randolph is not conscientious.If there is at least one people who is conscientious or not wrong, then Arlen is not tired.
Someone who is self-disciplined is always tremendous.
If there is someone who is both conscientious and self-disciplined, then Jorge is not tremendous.
If someone who is annoyed is also tremendous, then he is wrong.
Bud being not annoyed and Jorge being not wrong imply that Chrysta is not conscientious.
If someone is not self-disciplined and tired, then he is conscientious, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is tremendous, then Arlen is conscientious.
Someone who is not self-disciplined is always not tremendous.
If there is someone who is annoyed, then Bud is tired.
Randolph being wrong is equivalent to Chrysta being not tired.
Someone is self-disciplined if and only if he is not tremendous.
If someone is tremendous or not wrong, then he is self-disciplined. | Bud is not wrong. | neutral |
Arlen is self-disciplined.
Bud is annoyed.
Randolph is not wrong.
Jorge is not conscientious.
Chrysta is tired.
Bud is not conscientious.
Lars is not tremendous.
Lars is not conscientious.
Claude is conscientious.
Arlen is conscientious.
Claude is not annoyed.
Randolph is not conscientious.If there is at least one people who is conscientious or not wrong, then Arlen is not tired.
Someone who is self-disciplined is always tremendous.
If there is someone who is both conscientious and self-disciplined, then Jorge is not tremendous.
If someone who is annoyed is also tremendous, then he is wrong.
Bud being not annoyed and Jorge being not wrong imply that Chrysta is not conscientious.
If someone is not self-disciplined and tired, then he is conscientious, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is tremendous, then Arlen is conscientious.
Someone who is not self-disciplined is always not tremendous.
If there is someone who is annoyed, then Bud is tired.
Randolph being wrong is equivalent to Chrysta being not tired.
Someone is self-disciplined if and only if he is not tremendous.
If someone is tremendous or not wrong, then he is self-disciplined. | Jorge is conscientious. | contradiction |
Arlen is self-disciplined.
Bud is annoyed.
Randolph is not wrong.
Jorge is not conscientious.
Chrysta is tired.
Bud is not conscientious.
Lars is not tremendous.
Lars is not conscientious.
Claude is conscientious.
Arlen is conscientious.
Claude is not annoyed.
Randolph is not conscientious.If there is at least one people who is conscientious or not wrong, then Arlen is not tired.
Someone who is self-disciplined is always tremendous.
If there is someone who is both conscientious and self-disciplined, then Jorge is not tremendous.
If someone who is annoyed is also tremendous, then he is wrong.
Bud being not annoyed and Jorge being not wrong imply that Chrysta is not conscientious.
If someone is not self-disciplined and tired, then he is conscientious, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is tremendous, then Arlen is conscientious.
Someone who is not self-disciplined is always not tremendous.
If there is someone who is annoyed, then Bud is tired.
Randolph being wrong is equivalent to Chrysta being not tired.
Someone is self-disciplined if and only if he is not tremendous.
If someone is tremendous or not wrong, then he is self-disciplined. | Claude is not conscientious. | contradiction |
Arlen is self-disciplined.
Bud is annoyed.
Randolph is not wrong.
Jorge is not conscientious.
Chrysta is tired.
Bud is not conscientious.
Lars is not tremendous.
Lars is not conscientious.
Claude is conscientious.
Arlen is conscientious.
Claude is not annoyed.
Randolph is not conscientious.If there is at least one people who is conscientious or not wrong, then Arlen is not tired.
Someone who is self-disciplined is always tremendous.
If there is someone who is both conscientious and self-disciplined, then Jorge is not tremendous.
If someone who is annoyed is also tremendous, then he is wrong.
Bud being not annoyed and Jorge being not wrong imply that Chrysta is not conscientious.
If someone is not self-disciplined and tired, then he is conscientious, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is tremendous, then Arlen is conscientious.
Someone who is not self-disciplined is always not tremendous.
If there is someone who is annoyed, then Bud is tired.
Randolph being wrong is equivalent to Chrysta being not tired.
Someone is self-disciplined if and only if he is not tremendous.
If someone is tremendous or not wrong, then he is self-disciplined. | Arlen is not annoyed. | neutral |
Arlen is self-disciplined.
Bud is annoyed.
Randolph is not wrong.
Jorge is not conscientious.
Chrysta is tired.
Bud is not conscientious.
Lars is not tremendous.
Lars is not conscientious.
Claude is conscientious.
Arlen is conscientious.
Claude is not annoyed.
Randolph is not conscientious.If there is at least one people who is conscientious or not wrong, then Arlen is not tired.
Someone who is self-disciplined is always tremendous.
If there is someone who is both conscientious and self-disciplined, then Jorge is not tremendous.
If someone who is annoyed is also tremendous, then he is wrong.
Bud being not annoyed and Jorge being not wrong imply that Chrysta is not conscientious.
If someone is not self-disciplined and tired, then he is conscientious, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is tremendous, then Arlen is conscientious.
Someone who is not self-disciplined is always not tremendous.
If there is someone who is annoyed, then Bud is tired.
Randolph being wrong is equivalent to Chrysta being not tired.
Someone is self-disciplined if and only if he is not tremendous.
If someone is tremendous or not wrong, then he is self-disciplined. | Claude is tired. | entailment |
Arlen is self-disciplined.
Bud is annoyed.
Randolph is not wrong.
Jorge is not conscientious.
Chrysta is tired.
Bud is not conscientious.
Lars is not tremendous.
Lars is not conscientious.
Claude is conscientious.
Arlen is conscientious.
Claude is not annoyed.
Randolph is not conscientious.If there is at least one people who is conscientious or not wrong, then Arlen is not tired.
Someone who is self-disciplined is always tremendous.
If there is someone who is both conscientious and self-disciplined, then Jorge is not tremendous.
If someone who is annoyed is also tremendous, then he is wrong.
Bud being not annoyed and Jorge being not wrong imply that Chrysta is not conscientious.
If someone is not self-disciplined and tired, then he is conscientious, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is tremendous, then Arlen is conscientious.
Someone who is not self-disciplined is always not tremendous.
If there is someone who is annoyed, then Bud is tired.
Randolph being wrong is equivalent to Chrysta being not tired.
Someone is self-disciplined if and only if he is not tremendous.
If someone is tremendous or not wrong, then he is self-disciplined. | Lars is annoyed. | neutral |
Arlen is self-disciplined.
Bud is annoyed.
Randolph is not wrong.
Jorge is not conscientious.
Chrysta is tired.
Bud is not conscientious.
Lars is not tremendous.
Lars is not conscientious.
Claude is conscientious.
Arlen is conscientious.
Claude is not annoyed.
Randolph is not conscientious.If there is at least one people who is conscientious or not wrong, then Arlen is not tired.
Someone who is self-disciplined is always tremendous.
If there is someone who is both conscientious and self-disciplined, then Jorge is not tremendous.
If someone who is annoyed is also tremendous, then he is wrong.
Bud being not annoyed and Jorge being not wrong imply that Chrysta is not conscientious.
If someone is not self-disciplined and tired, then he is conscientious, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is tremendous, then Arlen is conscientious.
Someone who is not self-disciplined is always not tremendous.
If there is someone who is annoyed, then Bud is tired.
Randolph being wrong is equivalent to Chrysta being not tired.
Someone is self-disciplined if and only if he is not tremendous.
If someone is tremendous or not wrong, then he is self-disciplined. | Claude is conscientious. | entailment |
Arlen is self-disciplined.
Bud is annoyed.
Randolph is not wrong.
Jorge is not conscientious.
Chrysta is tired.
Bud is not conscientious.
Lars is not tremendous.
Lars is not conscientious.
Claude is conscientious.
Arlen is conscientious.
Claude is not annoyed.
Randolph is not conscientious.If there is at least one people who is conscientious or not wrong, then Arlen is not tired.
Someone who is self-disciplined is always tremendous.
If there is someone who is both conscientious and self-disciplined, then Jorge is not tremendous.
If someone who is annoyed is also tremendous, then he is wrong.
Bud being not annoyed and Jorge being not wrong imply that Chrysta is not conscientious.
If someone is not self-disciplined and tired, then he is conscientious, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is tremendous, then Arlen is conscientious.
Someone who is not self-disciplined is always not tremendous.
If there is someone who is annoyed, then Bud is tired.
Randolph being wrong is equivalent to Chrysta being not tired.
Someone is self-disciplined if and only if he is not tremendous.
If someone is tremendous or not wrong, then he is self-disciplined. | Jorge is not self-disciplined. | contradiction |
Arlen is self-disciplined.
Bud is annoyed.
Randolph is not wrong.
Jorge is not conscientious.
Chrysta is tired.
Bud is not conscientious.
Lars is not tremendous.
Lars is not conscientious.
Claude is conscientious.
Arlen is conscientious.
Claude is not annoyed.
Randolph is not conscientious.If there is at least one people who is conscientious or not wrong, then Arlen is not tired.
Someone who is self-disciplined is always tremendous.
If there is someone who is both conscientious and self-disciplined, then Jorge is not tremendous.
If someone who is annoyed is also tremendous, then he is wrong.
Bud being not annoyed and Jorge being not wrong imply that Chrysta is not conscientious.
If someone is not self-disciplined and tired, then he is conscientious, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is tremendous, then Arlen is conscientious.
Someone who is not self-disciplined is always not tremendous.
If there is someone who is annoyed, then Bud is tired.
Randolph being wrong is equivalent to Chrysta being not tired.
Someone is self-disciplined if and only if he is not tremendous.
If someone is tremendous or not wrong, then he is self-disciplined. | Bud is not tremendous. | neutral |
Arlen is self-disciplined.
Bud is annoyed.
Randolph is not wrong.
Jorge is not conscientious.
Chrysta is tired.
Bud is not conscientious.
Lars is not tremendous.
Lars is not conscientious.
Claude is conscientious.
Arlen is conscientious.
Claude is not annoyed.
Randolph is not conscientious.If there is at least one people who is conscientious or not wrong, then Arlen is not tired.
Someone who is self-disciplined is always tremendous.
If there is someone who is both conscientious and self-disciplined, then Jorge is not tremendous.
If someone who is annoyed is also tremendous, then he is wrong.
Bud being not annoyed and Jorge being not wrong imply that Chrysta is not conscientious.
If someone is not self-disciplined and tired, then he is conscientious, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is tremendous, then Arlen is conscientious.
Someone who is not self-disciplined is always not tremendous.
If there is someone who is annoyed, then Bud is tired.
Randolph being wrong is equivalent to Chrysta being not tired.
Someone is self-disciplined if and only if he is not tremendous.
If someone is tremendous or not wrong, then he is self-disciplined. | Claude is self-disciplined. | self_contradiction |
Arlen is self-disciplined.
Bud is annoyed.
Randolph is not wrong.
Jorge is not conscientious.
Chrysta is tired.
Bud is not conscientious.
Lars is not tremendous.
Lars is not conscientious.
Claude is conscientious.
Arlen is conscientious.
Claude is not annoyed.
Randolph is not conscientious.If there is at least one people who is conscientious or not wrong, then Arlen is not tired.
Someone who is self-disciplined is always tremendous.
If there is someone who is both conscientious and self-disciplined, then Jorge is not tremendous.
If someone who is annoyed is also tremendous, then he is wrong.
Bud being not annoyed and Jorge being not wrong imply that Chrysta is not conscientious.
If someone is not self-disciplined and tired, then he is conscientious, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is tremendous, then Arlen is conscientious.
Someone who is not self-disciplined is always not tremendous.
If there is someone who is annoyed, then Bud is tired.
Randolph being wrong is equivalent to Chrysta being not tired.
Someone is self-disciplined if and only if he is not tremendous.
If someone is tremendous or not wrong, then he is self-disciplined. | Lars is self-disciplined. | entailment |
Arlen is self-disciplined.
Bud is annoyed.
Randolph is not wrong.
Jorge is not conscientious.
Chrysta is tired.
Bud is not conscientious.
Lars is not tremendous.
Lars is not conscientious.
Claude is conscientious.
Arlen is conscientious.
Claude is not annoyed.
Randolph is not conscientious.If there is at least one people who is conscientious or not wrong, then Arlen is not tired.
Someone who is self-disciplined is always tremendous.
If there is someone who is both conscientious and self-disciplined, then Jorge is not tremendous.
If someone who is annoyed is also tremendous, then he is wrong.
Bud being not annoyed and Jorge being not wrong imply that Chrysta is not conscientious.
If someone is not self-disciplined and tired, then he is conscientious, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is tremendous, then Arlen is conscientious.
Someone who is not self-disciplined is always not tremendous.
If there is someone who is annoyed, then Bud is tired.
Randolph being wrong is equivalent to Chrysta being not tired.
Someone is self-disciplined if and only if he is not tremendous.
If someone is tremendous or not wrong, then he is self-disciplined. | Arlen is tired. | self_contradiction |
Arlen is self-disciplined.
Bud is annoyed.
Randolph is not wrong.
Jorge is not conscientious.
Chrysta is tired.
Bud is not conscientious.
Lars is not tremendous.
Lars is not conscientious.
Claude is conscientious.
Arlen is conscientious.
Claude is not annoyed.
Randolph is not conscientious.If there is at least one people who is conscientious or not wrong, then Arlen is not tired.
Someone who is self-disciplined is always tremendous.
If there is someone who is both conscientious and self-disciplined, then Jorge is not tremendous.
If someone who is annoyed is also tremendous, then he is wrong.
Bud being not annoyed and Jorge being not wrong imply that Chrysta is not conscientious.
If someone is not self-disciplined and tired, then he is conscientious, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is tremendous, then Arlen is conscientious.
Someone who is not self-disciplined is always not tremendous.
If there is someone who is annoyed, then Bud is tired.
Randolph being wrong is equivalent to Chrysta being not tired.
Someone is self-disciplined if and only if he is not tremendous.
If someone is tremendous or not wrong, then he is self-disciplined. | Claude is annoyed. | contradiction |
Arlen is self-disciplined.
Bud is annoyed.
Randolph is not wrong.
Jorge is not conscientious.
Chrysta is tired.
Bud is not conscientious.
Lars is not tremendous.
Lars is not conscientious.
Claude is conscientious.
Arlen is conscientious.
Claude is not annoyed.
Randolph is not conscientious.If there is at least one people who is conscientious or not wrong, then Arlen is not tired.
Someone who is self-disciplined is always tremendous.
If there is someone who is both conscientious and self-disciplined, then Jorge is not tremendous.
If someone who is annoyed is also tremendous, then he is wrong.
Bud being not annoyed and Jorge being not wrong imply that Chrysta is not conscientious.
If someone is not self-disciplined and tired, then he is conscientious, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is tremendous, then Arlen is conscientious.
Someone who is not self-disciplined is always not tremendous.
If there is someone who is annoyed, then Bud is tired.
Randolph being wrong is equivalent to Chrysta being not tired.
Someone is self-disciplined if and only if he is not tremendous.
If someone is tremendous or not wrong, then he is self-disciplined. | Randolph is not wrong. | entailment |
Arlen is self-disciplined.
Bud is annoyed.
Randolph is not wrong.
Jorge is not conscientious.
Chrysta is tired.
Bud is not conscientious.
Lars is not tremendous.
Lars is not conscientious.
Claude is conscientious.
Arlen is conscientious.
Claude is not annoyed.
Randolph is not conscientious.If there is at least one people who is conscientious or not wrong, then Arlen is not tired.
Someone who is self-disciplined is always tremendous.
If there is someone who is both conscientious and self-disciplined, then Jorge is not tremendous.
If someone who is annoyed is also tremendous, then he is wrong.
Bud being not annoyed and Jorge being not wrong imply that Chrysta is not conscientious.
If someone is not self-disciplined and tired, then he is conscientious, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is tremendous, then Arlen is conscientious.
Someone who is not self-disciplined is always not tremendous.
If there is someone who is annoyed, then Bud is tired.
Randolph being wrong is equivalent to Chrysta being not tired.
Someone is self-disciplined if and only if he is not tremendous.
If someone is tremendous or not wrong, then he is self-disciplined. | Lars is not tremendous. | self_contradiction |
Arlen is self-disciplined.
Bud is annoyed.
Randolph is not wrong.
Jorge is not conscientious.
Chrysta is tired.
Bud is not conscientious.
Lars is not tremendous.
Lars is not conscientious.
Claude is conscientious.
Arlen is conscientious.
Claude is not annoyed.
Randolph is not conscientious.If there is at least one people who is conscientious or not wrong, then Arlen is not tired.
Someone who is self-disciplined is always tremendous.
If there is someone who is both conscientious and self-disciplined, then Jorge is not tremendous.
If someone who is annoyed is also tremendous, then he is wrong.
Bud being not annoyed and Jorge being not wrong imply that Chrysta is not conscientious.
If someone is not self-disciplined and tired, then he is conscientious, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is tremendous, then Arlen is conscientious.
Someone who is not self-disciplined is always not tremendous.
If there is someone who is annoyed, then Bud is tired.
Randolph being wrong is equivalent to Chrysta being not tired.
Someone is self-disciplined if and only if he is not tremendous.
If someone is tremendous or not wrong, then he is self-disciplined. | Lars is tremendous. | self_contradiction |
Bevis is handsome.
Aidan is not odd.
Stewart is not political.
Aidan is weak.
Shawn is handsome.
Aidan is handsome.
Shawn is political.
Arthur is not political.
Arthur is weak.
Ricardo is not handsome.
Arthur is not consistent.
Stewart is consistent.If Shawn is not odd or Stewart is consistent, then Ricardo is not handsome.
If someone who is weak is also not consistent, then he is not light.
If there is someone who is both light and not political, then Bevis is weak.
As long as someone is not political, he is not handsome and odd.
Someone who is eithor political or not light is always consistent.
If all people are not light, then Ricardo is weak and Liam is not political.
It can be concluded that Bevis is not odd once knowing that Liam is not handsome.
Someone is not odd and consistent if and only if he is weak.
Aidan being not handsome and Ricardo being odd imply that Liam is light.
If there is someone who is handsome, then Bevis is not political.
If someone is not light, then he is not handsome.
If someone is not weak, then he is both light and handsome. | Arthur is odd. | self_contradiction |
Bevis is handsome.
Aidan is not odd.
Stewart is not political.
Aidan is weak.
Shawn is handsome.
Aidan is handsome.
Shawn is political.
Arthur is not political.
Arthur is weak.
Ricardo is not handsome.
Arthur is not consistent.
Stewart is consistent.If Shawn is not odd or Stewart is consistent, then Ricardo is not handsome.
If someone who is weak is also not consistent, then he is not light.
If there is someone who is both light and not political, then Bevis is weak.
As long as someone is not political, he is not handsome and odd.
Someone who is eithor political or not light is always consistent.
If all people are not light, then Ricardo is weak and Liam is not political.
It can be concluded that Bevis is not odd once knowing that Liam is not handsome.
Someone is not odd and consistent if and only if he is weak.
Aidan being not handsome and Ricardo being odd imply that Liam is light.
If there is someone who is handsome, then Bevis is not political.
If someone is not light, then he is not handsome.
If someone is not weak, then he is both light and handsome. | Arthur is not odd. | self_contradiction |
Bevis is handsome.
Aidan is not odd.
Stewart is not political.
Aidan is weak.
Shawn is handsome.
Aidan is handsome.
Shawn is political.
Arthur is not political.
Arthur is weak.
Ricardo is not handsome.
Arthur is not consistent.
Stewart is consistent.If Shawn is not odd or Stewart is consistent, then Ricardo is not handsome.
If someone who is weak is also not consistent, then he is not light.
If there is someone who is both light and not political, then Bevis is weak.
As long as someone is not political, he is not handsome and odd.
Someone who is eithor political or not light is always consistent.
If all people are not light, then Ricardo is weak and Liam is not political.
It can be concluded that Bevis is not odd once knowing that Liam is not handsome.
Someone is not odd and consistent if and only if he is weak.
Aidan being not handsome and Ricardo being odd imply that Liam is light.
If there is someone who is handsome, then Bevis is not political.
If someone is not light, then he is not handsome.
If someone is not weak, then he is both light and handsome. | Shawn is consistent. | entailment |
Bevis is handsome.
Aidan is not odd.
Stewart is not political.
Aidan is weak.
Shawn is handsome.
Aidan is handsome.
Shawn is political.
Arthur is not political.
Arthur is weak.
Ricardo is not handsome.
Arthur is not consistent.
Stewart is consistent.If Shawn is not odd or Stewart is consistent, then Ricardo is not handsome.
If someone who is weak is also not consistent, then he is not light.
If there is someone who is both light and not political, then Bevis is weak.
As long as someone is not political, he is not handsome and odd.
Someone who is eithor political or not light is always consistent.
If all people are not light, then Ricardo is weak and Liam is not political.
It can be concluded that Bevis is not odd once knowing that Liam is not handsome.
Someone is not odd and consistent if and only if he is weak.
Aidan being not handsome and Ricardo being odd imply that Liam is light.
If there is someone who is handsome, then Bevis is not political.
If someone is not light, then he is not handsome.
If someone is not weak, then he is both light and handsome. | Arthur is handsome. | contradiction |
Bevis is handsome.
Aidan is not odd.
Stewart is not political.
Aidan is weak.
Shawn is handsome.
Aidan is handsome.
Shawn is political.
Arthur is not political.
Arthur is weak.
Ricardo is not handsome.
Arthur is not consistent.
Stewart is consistent.If Shawn is not odd or Stewart is consistent, then Ricardo is not handsome.
If someone who is weak is also not consistent, then he is not light.
If there is someone who is both light and not political, then Bevis is weak.
As long as someone is not political, he is not handsome and odd.
Someone who is eithor political or not light is always consistent.
If all people are not light, then Ricardo is weak and Liam is not political.
It can be concluded that Bevis is not odd once knowing that Liam is not handsome.
Someone is not odd and consistent if and only if he is weak.
Aidan being not handsome and Ricardo being odd imply that Liam is light.
If there is someone who is handsome, then Bevis is not political.
If someone is not light, then he is not handsome.
If someone is not weak, then he is both light and handsome. | Aidan is not odd. | entailment |
Bevis is handsome.
Aidan is not odd.
Stewart is not political.
Aidan is weak.
Shawn is handsome.
Aidan is handsome.
Shawn is political.
Arthur is not political.
Arthur is weak.
Ricardo is not handsome.
Arthur is not consistent.
Stewart is consistent.If Shawn is not odd or Stewart is consistent, then Ricardo is not handsome.
If someone who is weak is also not consistent, then he is not light.
If there is someone who is both light and not political, then Bevis is weak.
As long as someone is not political, he is not handsome and odd.
Someone who is eithor political or not light is always consistent.
If all people are not light, then Ricardo is weak and Liam is not political.
It can be concluded that Bevis is not odd once knowing that Liam is not handsome.
Someone is not odd and consistent if and only if he is weak.
Aidan being not handsome and Ricardo being odd imply that Liam is light.
If there is someone who is handsome, then Bevis is not political.
If someone is not light, then he is not handsome.
If someone is not weak, then he is both light and handsome. | Stewart is handsome. | contradiction |
Bevis is handsome.
Aidan is not odd.
Stewart is not political.
Aidan is weak.
Shawn is handsome.
Aidan is handsome.
Shawn is political.
Arthur is not political.
Arthur is weak.
Ricardo is not handsome.
Arthur is not consistent.
Stewart is consistent.If Shawn is not odd or Stewart is consistent, then Ricardo is not handsome.
If someone who is weak is also not consistent, then he is not light.
If there is someone who is both light and not political, then Bevis is weak.
As long as someone is not political, he is not handsome and odd.
Someone who is eithor political or not light is always consistent.
If all people are not light, then Ricardo is weak and Liam is not political.
It can be concluded that Bevis is not odd once knowing that Liam is not handsome.
Someone is not odd and consistent if and only if he is weak.
Aidan being not handsome and Ricardo being odd imply that Liam is light.
If there is someone who is handsome, then Bevis is not political.
If someone is not light, then he is not handsome.
If someone is not weak, then he is both light and handsome. | Liam is not light. | neutral |
Bevis is handsome.
Aidan is not odd.
Stewart is not political.
Aidan is weak.
Shawn is handsome.
Aidan is handsome.
Shawn is political.
Arthur is not political.
Arthur is weak.
Ricardo is not handsome.
Arthur is not consistent.
Stewart is consistent.If Shawn is not odd or Stewart is consistent, then Ricardo is not handsome.
If someone who is weak is also not consistent, then he is not light.
If there is someone who is both light and not political, then Bevis is weak.
As long as someone is not political, he is not handsome and odd.
Someone who is eithor political or not light is always consistent.
If all people are not light, then Ricardo is weak and Liam is not political.
It can be concluded that Bevis is not odd once knowing that Liam is not handsome.
Someone is not odd and consistent if and only if he is weak.
Aidan being not handsome and Ricardo being odd imply that Liam is light.
If there is someone who is handsome, then Bevis is not political.
If someone is not light, then he is not handsome.
If someone is not weak, then he is both light and handsome. | Shawn is light. | neutral |
Bevis is handsome.
Aidan is not odd.
Stewart is not political.
Aidan is weak.
Shawn is handsome.
Aidan is handsome.
Shawn is political.
Arthur is not political.
Arthur is weak.
Ricardo is not handsome.
Arthur is not consistent.
Stewart is consistent.If Shawn is not odd or Stewart is consistent, then Ricardo is not handsome.
If someone who is weak is also not consistent, then he is not light.
If there is someone who is both light and not political, then Bevis is weak.
As long as someone is not political, he is not handsome and odd.
Someone who is eithor political or not light is always consistent.
If all people are not light, then Ricardo is weak and Liam is not political.
It can be concluded that Bevis is not odd once knowing that Liam is not handsome.
Someone is not odd and consistent if and only if he is weak.
Aidan being not handsome and Ricardo being odd imply that Liam is light.
If there is someone who is handsome, then Bevis is not political.
If someone is not light, then he is not handsome.
If someone is not weak, then he is both light and handsome. | Liam is not political. | neutral |
Bevis is handsome.
Aidan is not odd.
Stewart is not political.
Aidan is weak.
Shawn is handsome.
Aidan is handsome.
Shawn is political.
Arthur is not political.
Arthur is weak.
Ricardo is not handsome.
Arthur is not consistent.
Stewart is consistent.If Shawn is not odd or Stewart is consistent, then Ricardo is not handsome.
If someone who is weak is also not consistent, then he is not light.
If there is someone who is both light and not political, then Bevis is weak.
As long as someone is not political, he is not handsome and odd.
Someone who is eithor political or not light is always consistent.
If all people are not light, then Ricardo is weak and Liam is not political.
It can be concluded that Bevis is not odd once knowing that Liam is not handsome.
Someone is not odd and consistent if and only if he is weak.
Aidan being not handsome and Ricardo being odd imply that Liam is light.
If there is someone who is handsome, then Bevis is not political.
If someone is not light, then he is not handsome.
If someone is not weak, then he is both light and handsome. | Arthur is consistent. | self_contradiction |
Bevis is handsome.
Aidan is not odd.
Stewart is not political.
Aidan is weak.
Shawn is handsome.
Aidan is handsome.
Shawn is political.
Arthur is not political.
Arthur is weak.
Ricardo is not handsome.
Arthur is not consistent.
Stewart is consistent.If Shawn is not odd or Stewart is consistent, then Ricardo is not handsome.
If someone who is weak is also not consistent, then he is not light.
If there is someone who is both light and not political, then Bevis is weak.
As long as someone is not political, he is not handsome and odd.
Someone who is eithor political or not light is always consistent.
If all people are not light, then Ricardo is weak and Liam is not political.
It can be concluded that Bevis is not odd once knowing that Liam is not handsome.
Someone is not odd and consistent if and only if he is weak.
Aidan being not handsome and Ricardo being odd imply that Liam is light.
If there is someone who is handsome, then Bevis is not political.
If someone is not light, then he is not handsome.
If someone is not weak, then he is both light and handsome. | Shawn is odd. | neutral |
Bevis is handsome.
Aidan is not odd.
Stewart is not political.
Aidan is weak.
Shawn is handsome.
Aidan is handsome.
Shawn is political.
Arthur is not political.
Arthur is weak.
Ricardo is not handsome.
Arthur is not consistent.
Stewart is consistent.If Shawn is not odd or Stewart is consistent, then Ricardo is not handsome.
If someone who is weak is also not consistent, then he is not light.
If there is someone who is both light and not political, then Bevis is weak.
As long as someone is not political, he is not handsome and odd.
Someone who is eithor political or not light is always consistent.
If all people are not light, then Ricardo is weak and Liam is not political.
It can be concluded that Bevis is not odd once knowing that Liam is not handsome.
Someone is not odd and consistent if and only if he is weak.
Aidan being not handsome and Ricardo being odd imply that Liam is light.
If there is someone who is handsome, then Bevis is not political.
If someone is not light, then he is not handsome.
If someone is not weak, then he is both light and handsome. | Ricardo is handsome. | contradiction |
Bevis is handsome.
Aidan is not odd.
Stewart is not political.
Aidan is weak.
Shawn is handsome.
Aidan is handsome.
Shawn is political.
Arthur is not political.
Arthur is weak.
Ricardo is not handsome.
Arthur is not consistent.
Stewart is consistent.If Shawn is not odd or Stewart is consistent, then Ricardo is not handsome.
If someone who is weak is also not consistent, then he is not light.
If there is someone who is both light and not political, then Bevis is weak.
As long as someone is not political, he is not handsome and odd.
Someone who is eithor political or not light is always consistent.
If all people are not light, then Ricardo is weak and Liam is not political.
It can be concluded that Bevis is not odd once knowing that Liam is not handsome.
Someone is not odd and consistent if and only if he is weak.
Aidan being not handsome and Ricardo being odd imply that Liam is light.
If there is someone who is handsome, then Bevis is not political.
If someone is not light, then he is not handsome.
If someone is not weak, then he is both light and handsome. | Bevis is not handsome. | self_contradiction |
Bevis is handsome.
Aidan is not odd.
Stewart is not political.
Aidan is weak.
Shawn is handsome.
Aidan is handsome.
Shawn is political.
Arthur is not political.
Arthur is weak.
Ricardo is not handsome.
Arthur is not consistent.
Stewart is consistent.If Shawn is not odd or Stewart is consistent, then Ricardo is not handsome.
If someone who is weak is also not consistent, then he is not light.
If there is someone who is both light and not political, then Bevis is weak.
As long as someone is not political, he is not handsome and odd.
Someone who is eithor political or not light is always consistent.
If all people are not light, then Ricardo is weak and Liam is not political.
It can be concluded that Bevis is not odd once knowing that Liam is not handsome.
Someone is not odd and consistent if and only if he is weak.
Aidan being not handsome and Ricardo being odd imply that Liam is light.
If there is someone who is handsome, then Bevis is not political.
If someone is not light, then he is not handsome.
If someone is not weak, then he is both light and handsome. | Shawn is handsome. | entailment |
Bevis is handsome.
Aidan is not odd.
Stewart is not political.
Aidan is weak.
Shawn is handsome.
Aidan is handsome.
Shawn is political.
Arthur is not political.
Arthur is weak.
Ricardo is not handsome.
Arthur is not consistent.
Stewart is consistent.If Shawn is not odd or Stewart is consistent, then Ricardo is not handsome.
If someone who is weak is also not consistent, then he is not light.
If there is someone who is both light and not political, then Bevis is weak.
As long as someone is not political, he is not handsome and odd.
Someone who is eithor political or not light is always consistent.
If all people are not light, then Ricardo is weak and Liam is not political.
It can be concluded that Bevis is not odd once knowing that Liam is not handsome.
Someone is not odd and consistent if and only if he is weak.
Aidan being not handsome and Ricardo being odd imply that Liam is light.
If there is someone who is handsome, then Bevis is not political.
If someone is not light, then he is not handsome.
If someone is not weak, then he is both light and handsome. | Aidan is odd. | contradiction |
Bevis is handsome.
Aidan is not odd.
Stewart is not political.
Aidan is weak.
Shawn is handsome.
Aidan is handsome.
Shawn is political.
Arthur is not political.
Arthur is weak.
Ricardo is not handsome.
Arthur is not consistent.
Stewart is consistent.If Shawn is not odd or Stewart is consistent, then Ricardo is not handsome.
If someone who is weak is also not consistent, then he is not light.
If there is someone who is both light and not political, then Bevis is weak.
As long as someone is not political, he is not handsome and odd.
Someone who is eithor political or not light is always consistent.
If all people are not light, then Ricardo is weak and Liam is not political.
It can be concluded that Bevis is not odd once knowing that Liam is not handsome.
Someone is not odd and consistent if and only if he is weak.
Aidan being not handsome and Ricardo being odd imply that Liam is light.
If there is someone who is handsome, then Bevis is not political.
If someone is not light, then he is not handsome.
If someone is not weak, then he is both light and handsome. | Arthur is not consistent. | self_contradiction |
Bevis is handsome.
Aidan is not odd.
Stewart is not political.
Aidan is weak.
Shawn is handsome.
Aidan is handsome.
Shawn is political.
Arthur is not political.
Arthur is weak.
Ricardo is not handsome.
Arthur is not consistent.
Stewart is consistent.If Shawn is not odd or Stewart is consistent, then Ricardo is not handsome.
If someone who is weak is also not consistent, then he is not light.
If there is someone who is both light and not political, then Bevis is weak.
As long as someone is not political, he is not handsome and odd.
Someone who is eithor political or not light is always consistent.
If all people are not light, then Ricardo is weak and Liam is not political.
It can be concluded that Bevis is not odd once knowing that Liam is not handsome.
Someone is not odd and consistent if and only if he is weak.
Aidan being not handsome and Ricardo being odd imply that Liam is light.
If there is someone who is handsome, then Bevis is not political.
If someone is not light, then he is not handsome.
If someone is not weak, then he is both light and handsome. | Stewart is not odd. | contradiction |
Bevis is handsome.
Aidan is not odd.
Stewart is not political.
Aidan is weak.
Shawn is handsome.
Aidan is handsome.
Shawn is political.
Arthur is not political.
Arthur is weak.
Ricardo is not handsome.
Arthur is not consistent.
Stewart is consistent.If Shawn is not odd or Stewart is consistent, then Ricardo is not handsome.
If someone who is weak is also not consistent, then he is not light.
If there is someone who is both light and not political, then Bevis is weak.
As long as someone is not political, he is not handsome and odd.
Someone who is eithor political or not light is always consistent.
If all people are not light, then Ricardo is weak and Liam is not political.
It can be concluded that Bevis is not odd once knowing that Liam is not handsome.
Someone is not odd and consistent if and only if he is weak.
Aidan being not handsome and Ricardo being odd imply that Liam is light.
If there is someone who is handsome, then Bevis is not political.
If someone is not light, then he is not handsome.
If someone is not weak, then he is both light and handsome. | Shawn is political. | entailment |
Bevis is handsome.
Aidan is not odd.
Stewart is not political.
Aidan is weak.
Shawn is handsome.
Aidan is handsome.
Shawn is political.
Arthur is not political.
Arthur is weak.
Ricardo is not handsome.
Arthur is not consistent.
Stewart is consistent.If Shawn is not odd or Stewart is consistent, then Ricardo is not handsome.
If someone who is weak is also not consistent, then he is not light.
If there is someone who is both light and not political, then Bevis is weak.
As long as someone is not political, he is not handsome and odd.
Someone who is eithor political or not light is always consistent.
If all people are not light, then Ricardo is weak and Liam is not political.
It can be concluded that Bevis is not odd once knowing that Liam is not handsome.
Someone is not odd and consistent if and only if he is weak.
Aidan being not handsome and Ricardo being odd imply that Liam is light.
If there is someone who is handsome, then Bevis is not political.
If someone is not light, then he is not handsome.
If someone is not weak, then he is both light and handsome. | Stewart is not political. | entailment |
Bevis is handsome.
Aidan is not odd.
Stewart is not political.
Aidan is weak.
Shawn is handsome.
Aidan is handsome.
Shawn is political.
Arthur is not political.
Arthur is weak.
Ricardo is not handsome.
Arthur is not consistent.
Stewart is consistent.If Shawn is not odd or Stewart is consistent, then Ricardo is not handsome.
If someone who is weak is also not consistent, then he is not light.
If there is someone who is both light and not political, then Bevis is weak.
As long as someone is not political, he is not handsome and odd.
Someone who is eithor political or not light is always consistent.
If all people are not light, then Ricardo is weak and Liam is not political.
It can be concluded that Bevis is not odd once knowing that Liam is not handsome.
Someone is not odd and consistent if and only if he is weak.
Aidan being not handsome and Ricardo being odd imply that Liam is light.
If there is someone who is handsome, then Bevis is not political.
If someone is not light, then he is not handsome.
If someone is not weak, then he is both light and handsome. | Ricardo is weak. | neutral |
Norris is not tidy.
Blanche is selfish.
Norris is friendly.
Monique is friendly.
Harris is plucky.
Monique is not concerned.
Kilian is black.
Harris is not selfish.
Sterling is not black.
Blanche is not plucky.
Norris is black.
Harris is not friendly.Someone being both black and not concerned is equivalent to being not tidy and not plucky.
If there is someone who is black, then Harris is concerned.
If there is someone who is both plucky and not black, then Blanche is not tidy.
If someone is tidy or selfish, then he is not black.
Someone is not plucky if and only if he is tidy.
Hall being concerned and Harris being black imply that Blanche is not tidy.
As long as someone is not friendly, he is tidy and black.
Someone is plucky and selfish if and only if he is black.
Someone is not plucky and tidy if and only if he is concerned.
If all people are not selfish, then Norris is concerned and Sterling is tidy.
Sterling is not concerned if and only if Kilian is selfish.
If Monique is not plucky, then Norris is not selfish and Hall is tidy. | Blanche is concerned. | entailment |
Norris is not tidy.
Blanche is selfish.
Norris is friendly.
Monique is friendly.
Harris is plucky.
Monique is not concerned.
Kilian is black.
Harris is not selfish.
Sterling is not black.
Blanche is not plucky.
Norris is black.
Harris is not friendly.Someone being both black and not concerned is equivalent to being not tidy and not plucky.
If there is someone who is black, then Harris is concerned.
If there is someone who is both plucky and not black, then Blanche is not tidy.
If someone is tidy or selfish, then he is not black.
Someone is not plucky if and only if he is tidy.
Hall being concerned and Harris being black imply that Blanche is not tidy.
As long as someone is not friendly, he is tidy and black.
Someone is plucky and selfish if and only if he is black.
Someone is not plucky and tidy if and only if he is concerned.
If all people are not selfish, then Norris is concerned and Sterling is tidy.
Sterling is not concerned if and only if Kilian is selfish.
If Monique is not plucky, then Norris is not selfish and Hall is tidy. | Harris is not plucky. | self_contradiction |
Norris is not tidy.
Blanche is selfish.
Norris is friendly.
Monique is friendly.
Harris is plucky.
Monique is not concerned.
Kilian is black.
Harris is not selfish.
Sterling is not black.
Blanche is not plucky.
Norris is black.
Harris is not friendly.Someone being both black and not concerned is equivalent to being not tidy and not plucky.
If there is someone who is black, then Harris is concerned.
If there is someone who is both plucky and not black, then Blanche is not tidy.
If someone is tidy or selfish, then he is not black.
Someone is not plucky if and only if he is tidy.
Hall being concerned and Harris being black imply that Blanche is not tidy.
As long as someone is not friendly, he is tidy and black.
Someone is plucky and selfish if and only if he is black.
Someone is not plucky and tidy if and only if he is concerned.
If all people are not selfish, then Norris is concerned and Sterling is tidy.
Sterling is not concerned if and only if Kilian is selfish.
If Monique is not plucky, then Norris is not selfish and Hall is tidy. | Monique is not concerned. | entailment |
Norris is not tidy.
Blanche is selfish.
Norris is friendly.
Monique is friendly.
Harris is plucky.
Monique is not concerned.
Kilian is black.
Harris is not selfish.
Sterling is not black.
Blanche is not plucky.
Norris is black.
Harris is not friendly.Someone being both black and not concerned is equivalent to being not tidy and not plucky.
If there is someone who is black, then Harris is concerned.
If there is someone who is both plucky and not black, then Blanche is not tidy.
If someone is tidy or selfish, then he is not black.
Someone is not plucky if and only if he is tidy.
Hall being concerned and Harris being black imply that Blanche is not tidy.
As long as someone is not friendly, he is tidy and black.
Someone is plucky and selfish if and only if he is black.
Someone is not plucky and tidy if and only if he is concerned.
If all people are not selfish, then Norris is concerned and Sterling is tidy.
Sterling is not concerned if and only if Kilian is selfish.
If Monique is not plucky, then Norris is not selfish and Hall is tidy. | Kilian is selfish. | entailment |
Norris is not tidy.
Blanche is selfish.
Norris is friendly.
Monique is friendly.
Harris is plucky.
Monique is not concerned.
Kilian is black.
Harris is not selfish.
Sterling is not black.
Blanche is not plucky.
Norris is black.
Harris is not friendly.Someone being both black and not concerned is equivalent to being not tidy and not plucky.
If there is someone who is black, then Harris is concerned.
If there is someone who is both plucky and not black, then Blanche is not tidy.
If someone is tidy or selfish, then he is not black.
Someone is not plucky if and only if he is tidy.
Hall being concerned and Harris being black imply that Blanche is not tidy.
As long as someone is not friendly, he is tidy and black.
Someone is plucky and selfish if and only if he is black.
Someone is not plucky and tidy if and only if he is concerned.
If all people are not selfish, then Norris is concerned and Sterling is tidy.
Sterling is not concerned if and only if Kilian is selfish.
If Monique is not plucky, then Norris is not selfish and Hall is tidy. | Harris is not tidy. | contradiction |
Norris is not tidy.
Blanche is selfish.
Norris is friendly.
Monique is friendly.
Harris is plucky.
Monique is not concerned.
Kilian is black.
Harris is not selfish.
Sterling is not black.
Blanche is not plucky.
Norris is black.
Harris is not friendly.Someone being both black and not concerned is equivalent to being not tidy and not plucky.
If there is someone who is black, then Harris is concerned.
If there is someone who is both plucky and not black, then Blanche is not tidy.
If someone is tidy or selfish, then he is not black.
Someone is not plucky if and only if he is tidy.
Hall being concerned and Harris being black imply that Blanche is not tidy.
As long as someone is not friendly, he is tidy and black.
Someone is plucky and selfish if and only if he is black.
Someone is not plucky and tidy if and only if he is concerned.
If all people are not selfish, then Norris is concerned and Sterling is tidy.
Sterling is not concerned if and only if Kilian is selfish.
If Monique is not plucky, then Norris is not selfish and Hall is tidy. | Harris is not selfish. | self_contradiction |
Norris is not tidy.
Blanche is selfish.
Norris is friendly.
Monique is friendly.
Harris is plucky.
Monique is not concerned.
Kilian is black.
Harris is not selfish.
Sterling is not black.
Blanche is not plucky.
Norris is black.
Harris is not friendly.Someone being both black and not concerned is equivalent to being not tidy and not plucky.
If there is someone who is black, then Harris is concerned.
If there is someone who is both plucky and not black, then Blanche is not tidy.
If someone is tidy or selfish, then he is not black.
Someone is not plucky if and only if he is tidy.
Hall being concerned and Harris being black imply that Blanche is not tidy.
As long as someone is not friendly, he is tidy and black.
Someone is plucky and selfish if and only if he is black.
Someone is not plucky and tidy if and only if he is concerned.
If all people are not selfish, then Norris is concerned and Sterling is tidy.
Sterling is not concerned if and only if Kilian is selfish.
If Monique is not plucky, then Norris is not selfish and Hall is tidy. | Kilian is friendly. | neutral |
Norris is not tidy.
Blanche is selfish.
Norris is friendly.
Monique is friendly.
Harris is plucky.
Monique is not concerned.
Kilian is black.
Harris is not selfish.
Sterling is not black.
Blanche is not plucky.
Norris is black.
Harris is not friendly.Someone being both black and not concerned is equivalent to being not tidy and not plucky.
If there is someone who is black, then Harris is concerned.
If there is someone who is both plucky and not black, then Blanche is not tidy.
If someone is tidy or selfish, then he is not black.
Someone is not plucky if and only if he is tidy.
Hall being concerned and Harris being black imply that Blanche is not tidy.
As long as someone is not friendly, he is tidy and black.
Someone is plucky and selfish if and only if he is black.
Someone is not plucky and tidy if and only if he is concerned.
If all people are not selfish, then Norris is concerned and Sterling is tidy.
Sterling is not concerned if and only if Kilian is selfish.
If Monique is not plucky, then Norris is not selfish and Hall is tidy. | Norris is not selfish. | contradiction |
Norris is not tidy.
Blanche is selfish.
Norris is friendly.
Monique is friendly.
Harris is plucky.
Monique is not concerned.
Kilian is black.
Harris is not selfish.
Sterling is not black.
Blanche is not plucky.
Norris is black.
Harris is not friendly.Someone being both black and not concerned is equivalent to being not tidy and not plucky.
If there is someone who is black, then Harris is concerned.
If there is someone who is both plucky and not black, then Blanche is not tidy.
If someone is tidy or selfish, then he is not black.
Someone is not plucky if and only if he is tidy.
Hall being concerned and Harris being black imply that Blanche is not tidy.
As long as someone is not friendly, he is tidy and black.
Someone is plucky and selfish if and only if he is black.
Someone is not plucky and tidy if and only if he is concerned.
If all people are not selfish, then Norris is concerned and Sterling is tidy.
Sterling is not concerned if and only if Kilian is selfish.
If Monique is not plucky, then Norris is not selfish and Hall is tidy. | Sterling is not friendly. | neutral |
Norris is not tidy.
Blanche is selfish.
Norris is friendly.
Monique is friendly.
Harris is plucky.
Monique is not concerned.
Kilian is black.
Harris is not selfish.
Sterling is not black.
Blanche is not plucky.
Norris is black.
Harris is not friendly.Someone being both black and not concerned is equivalent to being not tidy and not plucky.
If there is someone who is black, then Harris is concerned.
If there is someone who is both plucky and not black, then Blanche is not tidy.
If someone is tidy or selfish, then he is not black.
Someone is not plucky if and only if he is tidy.
Hall being concerned and Harris being black imply that Blanche is not tidy.
As long as someone is not friendly, he is tidy and black.
Someone is plucky and selfish if and only if he is black.
Someone is not plucky and tidy if and only if he is concerned.
If all people are not selfish, then Norris is concerned and Sterling is tidy.
Sterling is not concerned if and only if Kilian is selfish.
If Monique is not plucky, then Norris is not selfish and Hall is tidy. | Harris is not concerned. | contradiction |
Norris is not tidy.
Blanche is selfish.
Norris is friendly.
Monique is friendly.
Harris is plucky.
Monique is not concerned.
Kilian is black.
Harris is not selfish.
Sterling is not black.
Blanche is not plucky.
Norris is black.
Harris is not friendly.Someone being both black and not concerned is equivalent to being not tidy and not plucky.
If there is someone who is black, then Harris is concerned.
If there is someone who is both plucky and not black, then Blanche is not tidy.
If someone is tidy or selfish, then he is not black.
Someone is not plucky if and only if he is tidy.
Hall being concerned and Harris being black imply that Blanche is not tidy.
As long as someone is not friendly, he is tidy and black.
Someone is plucky and selfish if and only if he is black.
Someone is not plucky and tidy if and only if he is concerned.
If all people are not selfish, then Norris is concerned and Sterling is tidy.
Sterling is not concerned if and only if Kilian is selfish.
If Monique is not plucky, then Norris is not selfish and Hall is tidy. | Norris is friendly. | entailment |
Norris is not tidy.
Blanche is selfish.
Norris is friendly.
Monique is friendly.
Harris is plucky.
Monique is not concerned.
Kilian is black.
Harris is not selfish.
Sterling is not black.
Blanche is not plucky.
Norris is black.
Harris is not friendly.Someone being both black and not concerned is equivalent to being not tidy and not plucky.
If there is someone who is black, then Harris is concerned.
If there is someone who is both plucky and not black, then Blanche is not tidy.
If someone is tidy or selfish, then he is not black.
Someone is not plucky if and only if he is tidy.
Hall being concerned and Harris being black imply that Blanche is not tidy.
As long as someone is not friendly, he is tidy and black.
Someone is plucky and selfish if and only if he is black.
Someone is not plucky and tidy if and only if he is concerned.
If all people are not selfish, then Norris is concerned and Sterling is tidy.
Sterling is not concerned if and only if Kilian is selfish.
If Monique is not plucky, then Norris is not selfish and Hall is tidy. | Sterling is concerned. | contradiction |
Norris is not tidy.
Blanche is selfish.
Norris is friendly.
Monique is friendly.
Harris is plucky.
Monique is not concerned.
Kilian is black.
Harris is not selfish.
Sterling is not black.
Blanche is not plucky.
Norris is black.
Harris is not friendly.Someone being both black and not concerned is equivalent to being not tidy and not plucky.
If there is someone who is black, then Harris is concerned.
If there is someone who is both plucky and not black, then Blanche is not tidy.
If someone is tidy or selfish, then he is not black.
Someone is not plucky if and only if he is tidy.
Hall being concerned and Harris being black imply that Blanche is not tidy.
As long as someone is not friendly, he is tidy and black.
Someone is plucky and selfish if and only if he is black.
Someone is not plucky and tidy if and only if he is concerned.
If all people are not selfish, then Norris is concerned and Sterling is tidy.
Sterling is not concerned if and only if Kilian is selfish.
If Monique is not plucky, then Norris is not selfish and Hall is tidy. | Sterling is black. | contradiction |
Norris is not tidy.
Blanche is selfish.
Norris is friendly.
Monique is friendly.
Harris is plucky.
Monique is not concerned.
Kilian is black.
Harris is not selfish.
Sterling is not black.
Blanche is not plucky.
Norris is black.
Harris is not friendly.Someone being both black and not concerned is equivalent to being not tidy and not plucky.
If there is someone who is black, then Harris is concerned.
If there is someone who is both plucky and not black, then Blanche is not tidy.
If someone is tidy or selfish, then he is not black.
Someone is not plucky if and only if he is tidy.
Hall being concerned and Harris being black imply that Blanche is not tidy.
As long as someone is not friendly, he is tidy and black.
Someone is plucky and selfish if and only if he is black.
Someone is not plucky and tidy if and only if he is concerned.
If all people are not selfish, then Norris is concerned and Sterling is tidy.
Sterling is not concerned if and only if Kilian is selfish.
If Monique is not plucky, then Norris is not selfish and Hall is tidy. | Kilian is black. | self_contradiction |
Norris is not tidy.
Blanche is selfish.
Norris is friendly.
Monique is friendly.
Harris is plucky.
Monique is not concerned.
Kilian is black.
Harris is not selfish.
Sterling is not black.
Blanche is not plucky.
Norris is black.
Harris is not friendly.Someone being both black and not concerned is equivalent to being not tidy and not plucky.
If there is someone who is black, then Harris is concerned.
If there is someone who is both plucky and not black, then Blanche is not tidy.
If someone is tidy or selfish, then he is not black.
Someone is not plucky if and only if he is tidy.
Hall being concerned and Harris being black imply that Blanche is not tidy.
As long as someone is not friendly, he is tidy and black.
Someone is plucky and selfish if and only if he is black.
Someone is not plucky and tidy if and only if he is concerned.
If all people are not selfish, then Norris is concerned and Sterling is tidy.
Sterling is not concerned if and only if Kilian is selfish.
If Monique is not plucky, then Norris is not selfish and Hall is tidy. | Kilian is not black. | self_contradiction |
Norris is not tidy.
Blanche is selfish.
Norris is friendly.
Monique is friendly.
Harris is plucky.
Monique is not concerned.
Kilian is black.
Harris is not selfish.
Sterling is not black.
Blanche is not plucky.
Norris is black.
Harris is not friendly.Someone being both black and not concerned is equivalent to being not tidy and not plucky.
If there is someone who is black, then Harris is concerned.
If there is someone who is both plucky and not black, then Blanche is not tidy.
If someone is tidy or selfish, then he is not black.
Someone is not plucky if and only if he is tidy.
Hall being concerned and Harris being black imply that Blanche is not tidy.
As long as someone is not friendly, he is tidy and black.
Someone is plucky and selfish if and only if he is black.
Someone is not plucky and tidy if and only if he is concerned.
If all people are not selfish, then Norris is concerned and Sterling is tidy.
Sterling is not concerned if and only if Kilian is selfish.
If Monique is not plucky, then Norris is not selfish and Hall is tidy. | Hall is concerned. | neutral |
Norris is not tidy.
Blanche is selfish.
Norris is friendly.
Monique is friendly.
Harris is plucky.
Monique is not concerned.
Kilian is black.
Harris is not selfish.
Sterling is not black.
Blanche is not plucky.
Norris is black.
Harris is not friendly.Someone being both black and not concerned is equivalent to being not tidy and not plucky.
If there is someone who is black, then Harris is concerned.
If there is someone who is both plucky and not black, then Blanche is not tidy.
If someone is tidy or selfish, then he is not black.
Someone is not plucky if and only if he is tidy.
Hall being concerned and Harris being black imply that Blanche is not tidy.
As long as someone is not friendly, he is tidy and black.
Someone is plucky and selfish if and only if he is black.
Someone is not plucky and tidy if and only if he is concerned.
If all people are not selfish, then Norris is concerned and Sterling is tidy.
Sterling is not concerned if and only if Kilian is selfish.
If Monique is not plucky, then Norris is not selfish and Hall is tidy. | Sterling is selfish. | neutral |
Norris is not tidy.
Blanche is selfish.
Norris is friendly.
Monique is friendly.
Harris is plucky.
Monique is not concerned.
Kilian is black.
Harris is not selfish.
Sterling is not black.
Blanche is not plucky.
Norris is black.
Harris is not friendly.Someone being both black and not concerned is equivalent to being not tidy and not plucky.
If there is someone who is black, then Harris is concerned.
If there is someone who is both plucky and not black, then Blanche is not tidy.
If someone is tidy or selfish, then he is not black.
Someone is not plucky if and only if he is tidy.
Hall being concerned and Harris being black imply that Blanche is not tidy.
As long as someone is not friendly, he is tidy and black.
Someone is plucky and selfish if and only if he is black.
Someone is not plucky and tidy if and only if he is concerned.
If all people are not selfish, then Norris is concerned and Sterling is tidy.
Sterling is not concerned if and only if Kilian is selfish.
If Monique is not plucky, then Norris is not selfish and Hall is tidy. | Monique is friendly. | entailment |
Norris is not tidy.
Blanche is selfish.
Norris is friendly.
Monique is friendly.
Harris is plucky.
Monique is not concerned.
Kilian is black.
Harris is not selfish.
Sterling is not black.
Blanche is not plucky.
Norris is black.
Harris is not friendly.Someone being both black and not concerned is equivalent to being not tidy and not plucky.
If there is someone who is black, then Harris is concerned.
If there is someone who is both plucky and not black, then Blanche is not tidy.
If someone is tidy or selfish, then he is not black.
Someone is not plucky if and only if he is tidy.
Hall being concerned and Harris being black imply that Blanche is not tidy.
As long as someone is not friendly, he is tidy and black.
Someone is plucky and selfish if and only if he is black.
Someone is not plucky and tidy if and only if he is concerned.
If all people are not selfish, then Norris is concerned and Sterling is tidy.
Sterling is not concerned if and only if Kilian is selfish.
If Monique is not plucky, then Norris is not selfish and Hall is tidy. | Kilian is not concerned. | neutral |
Norris is not tidy.
Blanche is selfish.
Norris is friendly.
Monique is friendly.
Harris is plucky.
Monique is not concerned.
Kilian is black.
Harris is not selfish.
Sterling is not black.
Blanche is not plucky.
Norris is black.
Harris is not friendly.Someone being both black and not concerned is equivalent to being not tidy and not plucky.
If there is someone who is black, then Harris is concerned.
If there is someone who is both plucky and not black, then Blanche is not tidy.
If someone is tidy or selfish, then he is not black.
Someone is not plucky if and only if he is tidy.
Hall being concerned and Harris being black imply that Blanche is not tidy.
As long as someone is not friendly, he is tidy and black.
Someone is plucky and selfish if and only if he is black.
Someone is not plucky and tidy if and only if he is concerned.
If all people are not selfish, then Norris is concerned and Sterling is tidy.
Sterling is not concerned if and only if Kilian is selfish.
If Monique is not plucky, then Norris is not selfish and Hall is tidy. | Harris is plucky. | self_contradiction |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.