premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Chalmers is helpful.
Grant is petite.
Walter is conscientious.
Chalmers is not conscientious.
Robert is not helpful.
Amery is not sore.
Kathryn is sore.
Grant is conscientious.
Walter is petite.
Walter is popular.
Gloria is not helpful.
Walter is tremendous.Kathryn being sore and Amery being not conscientious imply that Kathryn is petite and Grant is helpful.
If Chalmers is not tremendous, then Amery is not petite.
If there is someone who is sore, then Chalmers is tremendous.
Chalmers being not conscientious and Amery being tremendous imply that Kathryn is sore.
If there is someone who is both sore and not popular, then Grant is conscientious.
If there is nobody who is not not petite, then Kathryn is not helpful.
If there is someone who is tremendous, then Robert is not popular and Chalmers is not helpful.
Someone is sore and helpful if and only if he is not tremendous and not conscientious.
If there is someone who is either not popular or not tremendous, then Amery is sore.
If there is at least one people who is not petite or tremendous, then Chalmers is popular.
Gloria is tremendous if and only if Amery is sore and Grant is not helpful.
Someone who is eithor not conscientious or not popular is always sore. | Walter is conscientious. | entailment |
Chalmers is helpful.
Grant is petite.
Walter is conscientious.
Chalmers is not conscientious.
Robert is not helpful.
Amery is not sore.
Kathryn is sore.
Grant is conscientious.
Walter is petite.
Walter is popular.
Gloria is not helpful.
Walter is tremendous.Kathryn being sore and Amery being not conscientious imply that Kathryn is petite and Grant is helpful.
If Chalmers is not tremendous, then Amery is not petite.
If there is someone who is sore, then Chalmers is tremendous.
Chalmers being not conscientious and Amery being tremendous imply that Kathryn is sore.
If there is someone who is both sore and not popular, then Grant is conscientious.
If there is nobody who is not not petite, then Kathryn is not helpful.
If there is someone who is tremendous, then Robert is not popular and Chalmers is not helpful.
Someone is sore and helpful if and only if he is not tremendous and not conscientious.
If there is someone who is either not popular or not tremendous, then Amery is sore.
If there is at least one people who is not petite or tremendous, then Chalmers is popular.
Gloria is tremendous if and only if Amery is sore and Grant is not helpful.
Someone who is eithor not conscientious or not popular is always sore. | Chalmers is not tremendous. | self_contradiction |
Chalmers is helpful.
Grant is petite.
Walter is conscientious.
Chalmers is not conscientious.
Robert is not helpful.
Amery is not sore.
Kathryn is sore.
Grant is conscientious.
Walter is petite.
Walter is popular.
Gloria is not helpful.
Walter is tremendous.Kathryn being sore and Amery being not conscientious imply that Kathryn is petite and Grant is helpful.
If Chalmers is not tremendous, then Amery is not petite.
If there is someone who is sore, then Chalmers is tremendous.
Chalmers being not conscientious and Amery being tremendous imply that Kathryn is sore.
If there is someone who is both sore and not popular, then Grant is conscientious.
If there is nobody who is not not petite, then Kathryn is not helpful.
If there is someone who is tremendous, then Robert is not popular and Chalmers is not helpful.
Someone is sore and helpful if and only if he is not tremendous and not conscientious.
If there is someone who is either not popular or not tremendous, then Amery is sore.
If there is at least one people who is not petite or tremendous, then Chalmers is popular.
Gloria is tremendous if and only if Amery is sore and Grant is not helpful.
Someone who is eithor not conscientious or not popular is always sore. | Gloria is not tremendous. | neutral |
Chalmers is helpful.
Grant is petite.
Walter is conscientious.
Chalmers is not conscientious.
Robert is not helpful.
Amery is not sore.
Kathryn is sore.
Grant is conscientious.
Walter is petite.
Walter is popular.
Gloria is not helpful.
Walter is tremendous.Kathryn being sore and Amery being not conscientious imply that Kathryn is petite and Grant is helpful.
If Chalmers is not tremendous, then Amery is not petite.
If there is someone who is sore, then Chalmers is tremendous.
Chalmers being not conscientious and Amery being tremendous imply that Kathryn is sore.
If there is someone who is both sore and not popular, then Grant is conscientious.
If there is nobody who is not not petite, then Kathryn is not helpful.
If there is someone who is tremendous, then Robert is not popular and Chalmers is not helpful.
Someone is sore and helpful if and only if he is not tremendous and not conscientious.
If there is someone who is either not popular or not tremendous, then Amery is sore.
If there is at least one people who is not petite or tremendous, then Chalmers is popular.
Gloria is tremendous if and only if Amery is sore and Grant is not helpful.
Someone who is eithor not conscientious or not popular is always sore. | Amery is sore. | self_contradiction |
Chalmers is helpful.
Grant is petite.
Walter is conscientious.
Chalmers is not conscientious.
Robert is not helpful.
Amery is not sore.
Kathryn is sore.
Grant is conscientious.
Walter is petite.
Walter is popular.
Gloria is not helpful.
Walter is tremendous.Kathryn being sore and Amery being not conscientious imply that Kathryn is petite and Grant is helpful.
If Chalmers is not tremendous, then Amery is not petite.
If there is someone who is sore, then Chalmers is tremendous.
Chalmers being not conscientious and Amery being tremendous imply that Kathryn is sore.
If there is someone who is both sore and not popular, then Grant is conscientious.
If there is nobody who is not not petite, then Kathryn is not helpful.
If there is someone who is tremendous, then Robert is not popular and Chalmers is not helpful.
Someone is sore and helpful if and only if he is not tremendous and not conscientious.
If there is someone who is either not popular or not tremendous, then Amery is sore.
If there is at least one people who is not petite or tremendous, then Chalmers is popular.
Gloria is tremendous if and only if Amery is sore and Grant is not helpful.
Someone who is eithor not conscientious or not popular is always sore. | Amery is not conscientious. | neutral |
Chalmers is helpful.
Grant is petite.
Walter is conscientious.
Chalmers is not conscientious.
Robert is not helpful.
Amery is not sore.
Kathryn is sore.
Grant is conscientious.
Walter is petite.
Walter is popular.
Gloria is not helpful.
Walter is tremendous.Kathryn being sore and Amery being not conscientious imply that Kathryn is petite and Grant is helpful.
If Chalmers is not tremendous, then Amery is not petite.
If there is someone who is sore, then Chalmers is tremendous.
Chalmers being not conscientious and Amery being tremendous imply that Kathryn is sore.
If there is someone who is both sore and not popular, then Grant is conscientious.
If there is nobody who is not not petite, then Kathryn is not helpful.
If there is someone who is tremendous, then Robert is not popular and Chalmers is not helpful.
Someone is sore and helpful if and only if he is not tremendous and not conscientious.
If there is someone who is either not popular or not tremendous, then Amery is sore.
If there is at least one people who is not petite or tremendous, then Chalmers is popular.
Gloria is tremendous if and only if Amery is sore and Grant is not helpful.
Someone who is eithor not conscientious or not popular is always sore. | Amery is petite. | contradiction |
Chalmers is helpful.
Grant is petite.
Walter is conscientious.
Chalmers is not conscientious.
Robert is not helpful.
Amery is not sore.
Kathryn is sore.
Grant is conscientious.
Walter is petite.
Walter is popular.
Gloria is not helpful.
Walter is tremendous.Kathryn being sore and Amery being not conscientious imply that Kathryn is petite and Grant is helpful.
If Chalmers is not tremendous, then Amery is not petite.
If there is someone who is sore, then Chalmers is tremendous.
Chalmers being not conscientious and Amery being tremendous imply that Kathryn is sore.
If there is someone who is both sore and not popular, then Grant is conscientious.
If there is nobody who is not not petite, then Kathryn is not helpful.
If there is someone who is tremendous, then Robert is not popular and Chalmers is not helpful.
Someone is sore and helpful if and only if he is not tremendous and not conscientious.
If there is someone who is either not popular or not tremendous, then Amery is sore.
If there is at least one people who is not petite or tremendous, then Chalmers is popular.
Gloria is tremendous if and only if Amery is sore and Grant is not helpful.
Someone who is eithor not conscientious or not popular is always sore. | Walter is not conscientious. | contradiction |
Chalmers is helpful.
Grant is petite.
Walter is conscientious.
Chalmers is not conscientious.
Robert is not helpful.
Amery is not sore.
Kathryn is sore.
Grant is conscientious.
Walter is petite.
Walter is popular.
Gloria is not helpful.
Walter is tremendous.Kathryn being sore and Amery being not conscientious imply that Kathryn is petite and Grant is helpful.
If Chalmers is not tremendous, then Amery is not petite.
If there is someone who is sore, then Chalmers is tremendous.
Chalmers being not conscientious and Amery being tremendous imply that Kathryn is sore.
If there is someone who is both sore and not popular, then Grant is conscientious.
If there is nobody who is not not petite, then Kathryn is not helpful.
If there is someone who is tremendous, then Robert is not popular and Chalmers is not helpful.
Someone is sore and helpful if and only if he is not tremendous and not conscientious.
If there is someone who is either not popular or not tremendous, then Amery is sore.
If there is at least one people who is not petite or tremendous, then Chalmers is popular.
Gloria is tremendous if and only if Amery is sore and Grant is not helpful.
Someone who is eithor not conscientious or not popular is always sore. | Walter is not popular. | contradiction |
Chalmers is helpful.
Grant is petite.
Walter is conscientious.
Chalmers is not conscientious.
Robert is not helpful.
Amery is not sore.
Kathryn is sore.
Grant is conscientious.
Walter is petite.
Walter is popular.
Gloria is not helpful.
Walter is tremendous.Kathryn being sore and Amery being not conscientious imply that Kathryn is petite and Grant is helpful.
If Chalmers is not tremendous, then Amery is not petite.
If there is someone who is sore, then Chalmers is tremendous.
Chalmers being not conscientious and Amery being tremendous imply that Kathryn is sore.
If there is someone who is both sore and not popular, then Grant is conscientious.
If there is nobody who is not not petite, then Kathryn is not helpful.
If there is someone who is tremendous, then Robert is not popular and Chalmers is not helpful.
Someone is sore and helpful if and only if he is not tremendous and not conscientious.
If there is someone who is either not popular or not tremendous, then Amery is sore.
If there is at least one people who is not petite or tremendous, then Chalmers is popular.
Gloria is tremendous if and only if Amery is sore and Grant is not helpful.
Someone who is eithor not conscientious or not popular is always sore. | Chalmers is popular. | entailment |
Chalmers is helpful.
Grant is petite.
Walter is conscientious.
Chalmers is not conscientious.
Robert is not helpful.
Amery is not sore.
Kathryn is sore.
Grant is conscientious.
Walter is petite.
Walter is popular.
Gloria is not helpful.
Walter is tremendous.Kathryn being sore and Amery being not conscientious imply that Kathryn is petite and Grant is helpful.
If Chalmers is not tremendous, then Amery is not petite.
If there is someone who is sore, then Chalmers is tremendous.
Chalmers being not conscientious and Amery being tremendous imply that Kathryn is sore.
If there is someone who is both sore and not popular, then Grant is conscientious.
If there is nobody who is not not petite, then Kathryn is not helpful.
If there is someone who is tremendous, then Robert is not popular and Chalmers is not helpful.
Someone is sore and helpful if and only if he is not tremendous and not conscientious.
If there is someone who is either not popular or not tremendous, then Amery is sore.
If there is at least one people who is not petite or tremendous, then Chalmers is popular.
Gloria is tremendous if and only if Amery is sore and Grant is not helpful.
Someone who is eithor not conscientious or not popular is always sore. | Gloria is not helpful. | entailment |
Chalmers is helpful.
Grant is petite.
Walter is conscientious.
Chalmers is not conscientious.
Robert is not helpful.
Amery is not sore.
Kathryn is sore.
Grant is conscientious.
Walter is petite.
Walter is popular.
Gloria is not helpful.
Walter is tremendous.Kathryn being sore and Amery being not conscientious imply that Kathryn is petite and Grant is helpful.
If Chalmers is not tremendous, then Amery is not petite.
If there is someone who is sore, then Chalmers is tremendous.
Chalmers being not conscientious and Amery being tremendous imply that Kathryn is sore.
If there is someone who is both sore and not popular, then Grant is conscientious.
If there is nobody who is not not petite, then Kathryn is not helpful.
If there is someone who is tremendous, then Robert is not popular and Chalmers is not helpful.
Someone is sore and helpful if and only if he is not tremendous and not conscientious.
If there is someone who is either not popular or not tremendous, then Amery is sore.
If there is at least one people who is not petite or tremendous, then Chalmers is popular.
Gloria is tremendous if and only if Amery is sore and Grant is not helpful.
Someone who is eithor not conscientious or not popular is always sore. | Grant is not conscientious. | contradiction |
Chalmers is helpful.
Grant is petite.
Walter is conscientious.
Chalmers is not conscientious.
Robert is not helpful.
Amery is not sore.
Kathryn is sore.
Grant is conscientious.
Walter is petite.
Walter is popular.
Gloria is not helpful.
Walter is tremendous.Kathryn being sore and Amery being not conscientious imply that Kathryn is petite and Grant is helpful.
If Chalmers is not tremendous, then Amery is not petite.
If there is someone who is sore, then Chalmers is tremendous.
Chalmers being not conscientious and Amery being tremendous imply that Kathryn is sore.
If there is someone who is both sore and not popular, then Grant is conscientious.
If there is nobody who is not not petite, then Kathryn is not helpful.
If there is someone who is tremendous, then Robert is not popular and Chalmers is not helpful.
Someone is sore and helpful if and only if he is not tremendous and not conscientious.
If there is someone who is either not popular or not tremendous, then Amery is sore.
If there is at least one people who is not petite or tremendous, then Chalmers is popular.
Gloria is tremendous if and only if Amery is sore and Grant is not helpful.
Someone who is eithor not conscientious or not popular is always sore. | Walter is sore. | neutral |
Chalmers is helpful.
Grant is petite.
Walter is conscientious.
Chalmers is not conscientious.
Robert is not helpful.
Amery is not sore.
Kathryn is sore.
Grant is conscientious.
Walter is petite.
Walter is popular.
Gloria is not helpful.
Walter is tremendous.Kathryn being sore and Amery being not conscientious imply that Kathryn is petite and Grant is helpful.
If Chalmers is not tremendous, then Amery is not petite.
If there is someone who is sore, then Chalmers is tremendous.
Chalmers being not conscientious and Amery being tremendous imply that Kathryn is sore.
If there is someone who is both sore and not popular, then Grant is conscientious.
If there is nobody who is not not petite, then Kathryn is not helpful.
If there is someone who is tremendous, then Robert is not popular and Chalmers is not helpful.
Someone is sore and helpful if and only if he is not tremendous and not conscientious.
If there is someone who is either not popular or not tremendous, then Amery is sore.
If there is at least one people who is not petite or tremendous, then Chalmers is popular.
Gloria is tremendous if and only if Amery is sore and Grant is not helpful.
Someone who is eithor not conscientious or not popular is always sore. | Robert is not popular. | entailment |
Chalmers is helpful.
Grant is petite.
Walter is conscientious.
Chalmers is not conscientious.
Robert is not helpful.
Amery is not sore.
Kathryn is sore.
Grant is conscientious.
Walter is petite.
Walter is popular.
Gloria is not helpful.
Walter is tremendous.Kathryn being sore and Amery being not conscientious imply that Kathryn is petite and Grant is helpful.
If Chalmers is not tremendous, then Amery is not petite.
If there is someone who is sore, then Chalmers is tremendous.
Chalmers being not conscientious and Amery being tremendous imply that Kathryn is sore.
If there is someone who is both sore and not popular, then Grant is conscientious.
If there is nobody who is not not petite, then Kathryn is not helpful.
If there is someone who is tremendous, then Robert is not popular and Chalmers is not helpful.
Someone is sore and helpful if and only if he is not tremendous and not conscientious.
If there is someone who is either not popular or not tremendous, then Amery is sore.
If there is at least one people who is not petite or tremendous, then Chalmers is popular.
Gloria is tremendous if and only if Amery is sore and Grant is not helpful.
Someone who is eithor not conscientious or not popular is always sore. | Chalmers is not conscientious. | entailment |
Chalmers is helpful.
Grant is petite.
Walter is conscientious.
Chalmers is not conscientious.
Robert is not helpful.
Amery is not sore.
Kathryn is sore.
Grant is conscientious.
Walter is petite.
Walter is popular.
Gloria is not helpful.
Walter is tremendous.Kathryn being sore and Amery being not conscientious imply that Kathryn is petite and Grant is helpful.
If Chalmers is not tremendous, then Amery is not petite.
If there is someone who is sore, then Chalmers is tremendous.
Chalmers being not conscientious and Amery being tremendous imply that Kathryn is sore.
If there is someone who is both sore and not popular, then Grant is conscientious.
If there is nobody who is not not petite, then Kathryn is not helpful.
If there is someone who is tremendous, then Robert is not popular and Chalmers is not helpful.
Someone is sore and helpful if and only if he is not tremendous and not conscientious.
If there is someone who is either not popular or not tremendous, then Amery is sore.
If there is at least one people who is not petite or tremendous, then Chalmers is popular.
Gloria is tremendous if and only if Amery is sore and Grant is not helpful.
Someone who is eithor not conscientious or not popular is always sore. | Amery is not sore. | self_contradiction |
Chalmers is helpful.
Grant is petite.
Walter is conscientious.
Chalmers is not conscientious.
Robert is not helpful.
Amery is not sore.
Kathryn is sore.
Grant is conscientious.
Walter is petite.
Walter is popular.
Gloria is not helpful.
Walter is tremendous.Kathryn being sore and Amery being not conscientious imply that Kathryn is petite and Grant is helpful.
If Chalmers is not tremendous, then Amery is not petite.
If there is someone who is sore, then Chalmers is tremendous.
Chalmers being not conscientious and Amery being tremendous imply that Kathryn is sore.
If there is someone who is both sore and not popular, then Grant is conscientious.
If there is nobody who is not not petite, then Kathryn is not helpful.
If there is someone who is tremendous, then Robert is not popular and Chalmers is not helpful.
Someone is sore and helpful if and only if he is not tremendous and not conscientious.
If there is someone who is either not popular or not tremendous, then Amery is sore.
If there is at least one people who is not petite or tremendous, then Chalmers is popular.
Gloria is tremendous if and only if Amery is sore and Grant is not helpful.
Someone who is eithor not conscientious or not popular is always sore. | Chalmers is tremendous. | self_contradiction |
Chalmers is helpful.
Grant is petite.
Walter is conscientious.
Chalmers is not conscientious.
Robert is not helpful.
Amery is not sore.
Kathryn is sore.
Grant is conscientious.
Walter is petite.
Walter is popular.
Gloria is not helpful.
Walter is tremendous.Kathryn being sore and Amery being not conscientious imply that Kathryn is petite and Grant is helpful.
If Chalmers is not tremendous, then Amery is not petite.
If there is someone who is sore, then Chalmers is tremendous.
Chalmers being not conscientious and Amery being tremendous imply that Kathryn is sore.
If there is someone who is both sore and not popular, then Grant is conscientious.
If there is nobody who is not not petite, then Kathryn is not helpful.
If there is someone who is tremendous, then Robert is not popular and Chalmers is not helpful.
Someone is sore and helpful if and only if he is not tremendous and not conscientious.
If there is someone who is either not popular or not tremendous, then Amery is sore.
If there is at least one people who is not petite or tremendous, then Chalmers is popular.
Gloria is tremendous if and only if Amery is sore and Grant is not helpful.
Someone who is eithor not conscientious or not popular is always sore. | Chalmers is helpful. | self_contradiction |
Chalmers is helpful.
Grant is petite.
Walter is conscientious.
Chalmers is not conscientious.
Robert is not helpful.
Amery is not sore.
Kathryn is sore.
Grant is conscientious.
Walter is petite.
Walter is popular.
Gloria is not helpful.
Walter is tremendous.Kathryn being sore and Amery being not conscientious imply that Kathryn is petite and Grant is helpful.
If Chalmers is not tremendous, then Amery is not petite.
If there is someone who is sore, then Chalmers is tremendous.
Chalmers being not conscientious and Amery being tremendous imply that Kathryn is sore.
If there is someone who is both sore and not popular, then Grant is conscientious.
If there is nobody who is not not petite, then Kathryn is not helpful.
If there is someone who is tremendous, then Robert is not popular and Chalmers is not helpful.
Someone is sore and helpful if and only if he is not tremendous and not conscientious.
If there is someone who is either not popular or not tremendous, then Amery is sore.
If there is at least one people who is not petite or tremendous, then Chalmers is popular.
Gloria is tremendous if and only if Amery is sore and Grant is not helpful.
Someone who is eithor not conscientious or not popular is always sore. | Robert is popular. | contradiction |
Chalmers is helpful.
Grant is petite.
Walter is conscientious.
Chalmers is not conscientious.
Robert is not helpful.
Amery is not sore.
Kathryn is sore.
Grant is conscientious.
Walter is petite.
Walter is popular.
Gloria is not helpful.
Walter is tremendous.Kathryn being sore and Amery being not conscientious imply that Kathryn is petite and Grant is helpful.
If Chalmers is not tremendous, then Amery is not petite.
If there is someone who is sore, then Chalmers is tremendous.
Chalmers being not conscientious and Amery being tremendous imply that Kathryn is sore.
If there is someone who is both sore and not popular, then Grant is conscientious.
If there is nobody who is not not petite, then Kathryn is not helpful.
If there is someone who is tremendous, then Robert is not popular and Chalmers is not helpful.
Someone is sore and helpful if and only if he is not tremendous and not conscientious.
If there is someone who is either not popular or not tremendous, then Amery is sore.
If there is at least one people who is not petite or tremendous, then Chalmers is popular.
Gloria is tremendous if and only if Amery is sore and Grant is not helpful.
Someone who is eithor not conscientious or not popular is always sore. | Grant is not tremendous. | neutral |
Chalmers is helpful.
Grant is petite.
Walter is conscientious.
Chalmers is not conscientious.
Robert is not helpful.
Amery is not sore.
Kathryn is sore.
Grant is conscientious.
Walter is petite.
Walter is popular.
Gloria is not helpful.
Walter is tremendous.Kathryn being sore and Amery being not conscientious imply that Kathryn is petite and Grant is helpful.
If Chalmers is not tremendous, then Amery is not petite.
If there is someone who is sore, then Chalmers is tremendous.
Chalmers being not conscientious and Amery being tremendous imply that Kathryn is sore.
If there is someone who is both sore and not popular, then Grant is conscientious.
If there is nobody who is not not petite, then Kathryn is not helpful.
If there is someone who is tremendous, then Robert is not popular and Chalmers is not helpful.
Someone is sore and helpful if and only if he is not tremendous and not conscientious.
If there is someone who is either not popular or not tremendous, then Amery is sore.
If there is at least one people who is not petite or tremendous, then Chalmers is popular.
Gloria is tremendous if and only if Amery is sore and Grant is not helpful.
Someone who is eithor not conscientious or not popular is always sore. | Grant is popular. | neutral |
Quinlan is global.
Lombard is global.
Phineas is global.
Curt is open.
Phineas is not repulsive.
Garth is repulsive.
Curt is not hurt.
Lombard is not open.
Corwin is not hypocritical.
Curt is repulsive.
Robyn is global.
Corwin is not repulsive.Garth being hurt or Lombard being not tan implies that Lombard is repulsive.
As long as someone is not open, he is not tan and not repulsive.
If someone is not repulsive, then he is open.
If someone is both not global and not open, then he is not hurt.
It can be concluded that Robyn is not tan once knowing that Lombard is not open and Garth is not hypocritical.
Quinlan being not global is equivalent to Lombard being repulsive and Garth being hurt.
If there is someone who is either global or not tan, then Curt is not hurt.
If all people are hurt, then Garth is open.
If there is someone who is either global or repulsive, then Robyn is not open.
Robyn being hurt is equivalent to Curt being repulsive and Phineas being global.
Someone is not hypocritical if and only if he is hurt.
If someone is hurt, then he is not open, and vice versa. | Corwin is hurt. | entailment |
Quinlan is global.
Lombard is global.
Phineas is global.
Curt is open.
Phineas is not repulsive.
Garth is repulsive.
Curt is not hurt.
Lombard is not open.
Corwin is not hypocritical.
Curt is repulsive.
Robyn is global.
Corwin is not repulsive.Garth being hurt or Lombard being not tan implies that Lombard is repulsive.
As long as someone is not open, he is not tan and not repulsive.
If someone is not repulsive, then he is open.
If someone is both not global and not open, then he is not hurt.
It can be concluded that Robyn is not tan once knowing that Lombard is not open and Garth is not hypocritical.
Quinlan being not global is equivalent to Lombard being repulsive and Garth being hurt.
If there is someone who is either global or not tan, then Curt is not hurt.
If all people are hurt, then Garth is open.
If there is someone who is either global or repulsive, then Robyn is not open.
Robyn being hurt is equivalent to Curt being repulsive and Phineas being global.
Someone is not hypocritical if and only if he is hurt.
If someone is hurt, then he is not open, and vice versa. | Robyn is not open. | self_contradiction |
Quinlan is global.
Lombard is global.
Phineas is global.
Curt is open.
Phineas is not repulsive.
Garth is repulsive.
Curt is not hurt.
Lombard is not open.
Corwin is not hypocritical.
Curt is repulsive.
Robyn is global.
Corwin is not repulsive.Garth being hurt or Lombard being not tan implies that Lombard is repulsive.
As long as someone is not open, he is not tan and not repulsive.
If someone is not repulsive, then he is open.
If someone is both not global and not open, then he is not hurt.
It can be concluded that Robyn is not tan once knowing that Lombard is not open and Garth is not hypocritical.
Quinlan being not global is equivalent to Lombard being repulsive and Garth being hurt.
If there is someone who is either global or not tan, then Curt is not hurt.
If all people are hurt, then Garth is open.
If there is someone who is either global or repulsive, then Robyn is not open.
Robyn being hurt is equivalent to Curt being repulsive and Phineas being global.
Someone is not hypocritical if and only if he is hurt.
If someone is hurt, then he is not open, and vice versa. | Corwin is global. | neutral |
Quinlan is global.
Lombard is global.
Phineas is global.
Curt is open.
Phineas is not repulsive.
Garth is repulsive.
Curt is not hurt.
Lombard is not open.
Corwin is not hypocritical.
Curt is repulsive.
Robyn is global.
Corwin is not repulsive.Garth being hurt or Lombard being not tan implies that Lombard is repulsive.
As long as someone is not open, he is not tan and not repulsive.
If someone is not repulsive, then he is open.
If someone is both not global and not open, then he is not hurt.
It can be concluded that Robyn is not tan once knowing that Lombard is not open and Garth is not hypocritical.
Quinlan being not global is equivalent to Lombard being repulsive and Garth being hurt.
If there is someone who is either global or not tan, then Curt is not hurt.
If all people are hurt, then Garth is open.
If there is someone who is either global or repulsive, then Robyn is not open.
Robyn being hurt is equivalent to Curt being repulsive and Phineas being global.
Someone is not hypocritical if and only if he is hurt.
If someone is hurt, then he is not open, and vice versa. | Curt is hurt. | contradiction |
Quinlan is global.
Lombard is global.
Phineas is global.
Curt is open.
Phineas is not repulsive.
Garth is repulsive.
Curt is not hurt.
Lombard is not open.
Corwin is not hypocritical.
Curt is repulsive.
Robyn is global.
Corwin is not repulsive.Garth being hurt or Lombard being not tan implies that Lombard is repulsive.
As long as someone is not open, he is not tan and not repulsive.
If someone is not repulsive, then he is open.
If someone is both not global and not open, then he is not hurt.
It can be concluded that Robyn is not tan once knowing that Lombard is not open and Garth is not hypocritical.
Quinlan being not global is equivalent to Lombard being repulsive and Garth being hurt.
If there is someone who is either global or not tan, then Curt is not hurt.
If all people are hurt, then Garth is open.
If there is someone who is either global or repulsive, then Robyn is not open.
Robyn being hurt is equivalent to Curt being repulsive and Phineas being global.
Someone is not hypocritical if and only if he is hurt.
If someone is hurt, then he is not open, and vice versa. | Robyn is not hypocritical. | entailment |
Quinlan is global.
Lombard is global.
Phineas is global.
Curt is open.
Phineas is not repulsive.
Garth is repulsive.
Curt is not hurt.
Lombard is not open.
Corwin is not hypocritical.
Curt is repulsive.
Robyn is global.
Corwin is not repulsive.Garth being hurt or Lombard being not tan implies that Lombard is repulsive.
As long as someone is not open, he is not tan and not repulsive.
If someone is not repulsive, then he is open.
If someone is both not global and not open, then he is not hurt.
It can be concluded that Robyn is not tan once knowing that Lombard is not open and Garth is not hypocritical.
Quinlan being not global is equivalent to Lombard being repulsive and Garth being hurt.
If there is someone who is either global or not tan, then Curt is not hurt.
If all people are hurt, then Garth is open.
If there is someone who is either global or repulsive, then Robyn is not open.
Robyn being hurt is equivalent to Curt being repulsive and Phineas being global.
Someone is not hypocritical if and only if he is hurt.
If someone is hurt, then he is not open, and vice versa. | Quinlan is not global. | contradiction |
Quinlan is global.
Lombard is global.
Phineas is global.
Curt is open.
Phineas is not repulsive.
Garth is repulsive.
Curt is not hurt.
Lombard is not open.
Corwin is not hypocritical.
Curt is repulsive.
Robyn is global.
Corwin is not repulsive.Garth being hurt or Lombard being not tan implies that Lombard is repulsive.
As long as someone is not open, he is not tan and not repulsive.
If someone is not repulsive, then he is open.
If someone is both not global and not open, then he is not hurt.
It can be concluded that Robyn is not tan once knowing that Lombard is not open and Garth is not hypocritical.
Quinlan being not global is equivalent to Lombard being repulsive and Garth being hurt.
If there is someone who is either global or not tan, then Curt is not hurt.
If all people are hurt, then Garth is open.
If there is someone who is either global or repulsive, then Robyn is not open.
Robyn being hurt is equivalent to Curt being repulsive and Phineas being global.
Someone is not hypocritical if and only if he is hurt.
If someone is hurt, then he is not open, and vice versa. | Lombard is open. | self_contradiction |
Quinlan is global.
Lombard is global.
Phineas is global.
Curt is open.
Phineas is not repulsive.
Garth is repulsive.
Curt is not hurt.
Lombard is not open.
Corwin is not hypocritical.
Curt is repulsive.
Robyn is global.
Corwin is not repulsive.Garth being hurt or Lombard being not tan implies that Lombard is repulsive.
As long as someone is not open, he is not tan and not repulsive.
If someone is not repulsive, then he is open.
If someone is both not global and not open, then he is not hurt.
It can be concluded that Robyn is not tan once knowing that Lombard is not open and Garth is not hypocritical.
Quinlan being not global is equivalent to Lombard being repulsive and Garth being hurt.
If there is someone who is either global or not tan, then Curt is not hurt.
If all people are hurt, then Garth is open.
If there is someone who is either global or repulsive, then Robyn is not open.
Robyn being hurt is equivalent to Curt being repulsive and Phineas being global.
Someone is not hypocritical if and only if he is hurt.
If someone is hurt, then he is not open, and vice versa. | Robyn is open. | self_contradiction |
Quinlan is global.
Lombard is global.
Phineas is global.
Curt is open.
Phineas is not repulsive.
Garth is repulsive.
Curt is not hurt.
Lombard is not open.
Corwin is not hypocritical.
Curt is repulsive.
Robyn is global.
Corwin is not repulsive.Garth being hurt or Lombard being not tan implies that Lombard is repulsive.
As long as someone is not open, he is not tan and not repulsive.
If someone is not repulsive, then he is open.
If someone is both not global and not open, then he is not hurt.
It can be concluded that Robyn is not tan once knowing that Lombard is not open and Garth is not hypocritical.
Quinlan being not global is equivalent to Lombard being repulsive and Garth being hurt.
If there is someone who is either global or not tan, then Curt is not hurt.
If all people are hurt, then Garth is open.
If there is someone who is either global or repulsive, then Robyn is not open.
Robyn being hurt is equivalent to Curt being repulsive and Phineas being global.
Someone is not hypocritical if and only if he is hurt.
If someone is hurt, then he is not open, and vice versa. | Quinlan is not repulsive. | neutral |
Quinlan is global.
Lombard is global.
Phineas is global.
Curt is open.
Phineas is not repulsive.
Garth is repulsive.
Curt is not hurt.
Lombard is not open.
Corwin is not hypocritical.
Curt is repulsive.
Robyn is global.
Corwin is not repulsive.Garth being hurt or Lombard being not tan implies that Lombard is repulsive.
As long as someone is not open, he is not tan and not repulsive.
If someone is not repulsive, then he is open.
If someone is both not global and not open, then he is not hurt.
It can be concluded that Robyn is not tan once knowing that Lombard is not open and Garth is not hypocritical.
Quinlan being not global is equivalent to Lombard being repulsive and Garth being hurt.
If there is someone who is either global or not tan, then Curt is not hurt.
If all people are hurt, then Garth is open.
If there is someone who is either global or repulsive, then Robyn is not open.
Robyn being hurt is equivalent to Curt being repulsive and Phineas being global.
Someone is not hypocritical if and only if he is hurt.
If someone is hurt, then he is not open, and vice versa. | Lombard is hypocritical. | contradiction |
Quinlan is global.
Lombard is global.
Phineas is global.
Curt is open.
Phineas is not repulsive.
Garth is repulsive.
Curt is not hurt.
Lombard is not open.
Corwin is not hypocritical.
Curt is repulsive.
Robyn is global.
Corwin is not repulsive.Garth being hurt or Lombard being not tan implies that Lombard is repulsive.
As long as someone is not open, he is not tan and not repulsive.
If someone is not repulsive, then he is open.
If someone is both not global and not open, then he is not hurt.
It can be concluded that Robyn is not tan once knowing that Lombard is not open and Garth is not hypocritical.
Quinlan being not global is equivalent to Lombard being repulsive and Garth being hurt.
If there is someone who is either global or not tan, then Curt is not hurt.
If all people are hurt, then Garth is open.
If there is someone who is either global or repulsive, then Robyn is not open.
Robyn being hurt is equivalent to Curt being repulsive and Phineas being global.
Someone is not hypocritical if and only if he is hurt.
If someone is hurt, then he is not open, and vice versa. | Curt is open. | entailment |
Quinlan is global.
Lombard is global.
Phineas is global.
Curt is open.
Phineas is not repulsive.
Garth is repulsive.
Curt is not hurt.
Lombard is not open.
Corwin is not hypocritical.
Curt is repulsive.
Robyn is global.
Corwin is not repulsive.Garth being hurt or Lombard being not tan implies that Lombard is repulsive.
As long as someone is not open, he is not tan and not repulsive.
If someone is not repulsive, then he is open.
If someone is both not global and not open, then he is not hurt.
It can be concluded that Robyn is not tan once knowing that Lombard is not open and Garth is not hypocritical.
Quinlan being not global is equivalent to Lombard being repulsive and Garth being hurt.
If there is someone who is either global or not tan, then Curt is not hurt.
If all people are hurt, then Garth is open.
If there is someone who is either global or repulsive, then Robyn is not open.
Robyn being hurt is equivalent to Curt being repulsive and Phineas being global.
Someone is not hypocritical if and only if he is hurt.
If someone is hurt, then he is not open, and vice versa. | Lombard is not repulsive. | self_contradiction |
Quinlan is global.
Lombard is global.
Phineas is global.
Curt is open.
Phineas is not repulsive.
Garth is repulsive.
Curt is not hurt.
Lombard is not open.
Corwin is not hypocritical.
Curt is repulsive.
Robyn is global.
Corwin is not repulsive.Garth being hurt or Lombard being not tan implies that Lombard is repulsive.
As long as someone is not open, he is not tan and not repulsive.
If someone is not repulsive, then he is open.
If someone is both not global and not open, then he is not hurt.
It can be concluded that Robyn is not tan once knowing that Lombard is not open and Garth is not hypocritical.
Quinlan being not global is equivalent to Lombard being repulsive and Garth being hurt.
If there is someone who is either global or not tan, then Curt is not hurt.
If all people are hurt, then Garth is open.
If there is someone who is either global or repulsive, then Robyn is not open.
Robyn being hurt is equivalent to Curt being repulsive and Phineas being global.
Someone is not hypocritical if and only if he is hurt.
If someone is hurt, then he is not open, and vice versa. | Curt is not open. | contradiction |
Quinlan is global.
Lombard is global.
Phineas is global.
Curt is open.
Phineas is not repulsive.
Garth is repulsive.
Curt is not hurt.
Lombard is not open.
Corwin is not hypocritical.
Curt is repulsive.
Robyn is global.
Corwin is not repulsive.Garth being hurt or Lombard being not tan implies that Lombard is repulsive.
As long as someone is not open, he is not tan and not repulsive.
If someone is not repulsive, then he is open.
If someone is both not global and not open, then he is not hurt.
It can be concluded that Robyn is not tan once knowing that Lombard is not open and Garth is not hypocritical.
Quinlan being not global is equivalent to Lombard being repulsive and Garth being hurt.
If there is someone who is either global or not tan, then Curt is not hurt.
If all people are hurt, then Garth is open.
If there is someone who is either global or repulsive, then Robyn is not open.
Robyn being hurt is equivalent to Curt being repulsive and Phineas being global.
Someone is not hypocritical if and only if he is hurt.
If someone is hurt, then he is not open, and vice versa. | Curt is repulsive. | entailment |
Quinlan is global.
Lombard is global.
Phineas is global.
Curt is open.
Phineas is not repulsive.
Garth is repulsive.
Curt is not hurt.
Lombard is not open.
Corwin is not hypocritical.
Curt is repulsive.
Robyn is global.
Corwin is not repulsive.Garth being hurt or Lombard being not tan implies that Lombard is repulsive.
As long as someone is not open, he is not tan and not repulsive.
If someone is not repulsive, then he is open.
If someone is both not global and not open, then he is not hurt.
It can be concluded that Robyn is not tan once knowing that Lombard is not open and Garth is not hypocritical.
Quinlan being not global is equivalent to Lombard being repulsive and Garth being hurt.
If there is someone who is either global or not tan, then Curt is not hurt.
If all people are hurt, then Garth is open.
If there is someone who is either global or repulsive, then Robyn is not open.
Robyn being hurt is equivalent to Curt being repulsive and Phineas being global.
Someone is not hypocritical if and only if he is hurt.
If someone is hurt, then he is not open, and vice versa. | Lombard is tan. | contradiction |
Quinlan is global.
Lombard is global.
Phineas is global.
Curt is open.
Phineas is not repulsive.
Garth is repulsive.
Curt is not hurt.
Lombard is not open.
Corwin is not hypocritical.
Curt is repulsive.
Robyn is global.
Corwin is not repulsive.Garth being hurt or Lombard being not tan implies that Lombard is repulsive.
As long as someone is not open, he is not tan and not repulsive.
If someone is not repulsive, then he is open.
If someone is both not global and not open, then he is not hurt.
It can be concluded that Robyn is not tan once knowing that Lombard is not open and Garth is not hypocritical.
Quinlan being not global is equivalent to Lombard being repulsive and Garth being hurt.
If there is someone who is either global or not tan, then Curt is not hurt.
If all people are hurt, then Garth is open.
If there is someone who is either global or repulsive, then Robyn is not open.
Robyn being hurt is equivalent to Curt being repulsive and Phineas being global.
Someone is not hypocritical if and only if he is hurt.
If someone is hurt, then he is not open, and vice versa. | Garth is not hypocritical. | neutral |
Quinlan is global.
Lombard is global.
Phineas is global.
Curt is open.
Phineas is not repulsive.
Garth is repulsive.
Curt is not hurt.
Lombard is not open.
Corwin is not hypocritical.
Curt is repulsive.
Robyn is global.
Corwin is not repulsive.Garth being hurt or Lombard being not tan implies that Lombard is repulsive.
As long as someone is not open, he is not tan and not repulsive.
If someone is not repulsive, then he is open.
If someone is both not global and not open, then he is not hurt.
It can be concluded that Robyn is not tan once knowing that Lombard is not open and Garth is not hypocritical.
Quinlan being not global is equivalent to Lombard being repulsive and Garth being hurt.
If there is someone who is either global or not tan, then Curt is not hurt.
If all people are hurt, then Garth is open.
If there is someone who is either global or repulsive, then Robyn is not open.
Robyn being hurt is equivalent to Curt being repulsive and Phineas being global.
Someone is not hypocritical if and only if he is hurt.
If someone is hurt, then he is not open, and vice versa. | Phineas is tan. | neutral |
Quinlan is global.
Lombard is global.
Phineas is global.
Curt is open.
Phineas is not repulsive.
Garth is repulsive.
Curt is not hurt.
Lombard is not open.
Corwin is not hypocritical.
Curt is repulsive.
Robyn is global.
Corwin is not repulsive.Garth being hurt or Lombard being not tan implies that Lombard is repulsive.
As long as someone is not open, he is not tan and not repulsive.
If someone is not repulsive, then he is open.
If someone is both not global and not open, then he is not hurt.
It can be concluded that Robyn is not tan once knowing that Lombard is not open and Garth is not hypocritical.
Quinlan being not global is equivalent to Lombard being repulsive and Garth being hurt.
If there is someone who is either global or not tan, then Curt is not hurt.
If all people are hurt, then Garth is open.
If there is someone who is either global or repulsive, then Robyn is not open.
Robyn being hurt is equivalent to Curt being repulsive and Phineas being global.
Someone is not hypocritical if and only if he is hurt.
If someone is hurt, then he is not open, and vice versa. | Corwin is not open. | self_contradiction |
Quinlan is global.
Lombard is global.
Phineas is global.
Curt is open.
Phineas is not repulsive.
Garth is repulsive.
Curt is not hurt.
Lombard is not open.
Corwin is not hypocritical.
Curt is repulsive.
Robyn is global.
Corwin is not repulsive.Garth being hurt or Lombard being not tan implies that Lombard is repulsive.
As long as someone is not open, he is not tan and not repulsive.
If someone is not repulsive, then he is open.
If someone is both not global and not open, then he is not hurt.
It can be concluded that Robyn is not tan once knowing that Lombard is not open and Garth is not hypocritical.
Quinlan being not global is equivalent to Lombard being repulsive and Garth being hurt.
If there is someone who is either global or not tan, then Curt is not hurt.
If all people are hurt, then Garth is open.
If there is someone who is either global or repulsive, then Robyn is not open.
Robyn being hurt is equivalent to Curt being repulsive and Phineas being global.
Someone is not hypocritical if and only if he is hurt.
If someone is hurt, then he is not open, and vice versa. | Quinlan is not open. | neutral |
Quinlan is global.
Lombard is global.
Phineas is global.
Curt is open.
Phineas is not repulsive.
Garth is repulsive.
Curt is not hurt.
Lombard is not open.
Corwin is not hypocritical.
Curt is repulsive.
Robyn is global.
Corwin is not repulsive.Garth being hurt or Lombard being not tan implies that Lombard is repulsive.
As long as someone is not open, he is not tan and not repulsive.
If someone is not repulsive, then he is open.
If someone is both not global and not open, then he is not hurt.
It can be concluded that Robyn is not tan once knowing that Lombard is not open and Garth is not hypocritical.
Quinlan being not global is equivalent to Lombard being repulsive and Garth being hurt.
If there is someone who is either global or not tan, then Curt is not hurt.
If all people are hurt, then Garth is open.
If there is someone who is either global or repulsive, then Robyn is not open.
Robyn being hurt is equivalent to Curt being repulsive and Phineas being global.
Someone is not hypocritical if and only if he is hurt.
If someone is hurt, then he is not open, and vice versa. | Robyn is hurt. | entailment |
Kingsley is not thankful.
Rupert is not thankful.
Braden is not adorable.
Aubrey is not unusual.
Rupert is adorable.
Michael is sad.
Rupert is not unusual.
Gilbert is sad.
Michael is adorable.
Stephen is sad.
Michael is not thankful.
Rupert is sad.Kingsley being not adorable is equivalent to Rupert being not unusual and Gilbert being not tidy.
If Aubrey is adorable, then Michael is sad and Kingsley is silly, and vice versa.
If someone is adorable, then he is silly.
If there is someone who is either sad or not thankful, then Gilbert is silly and Stephen is adorable.
Someone is not adorable and not unusual if and only if he is silly and not tidy.
If there is someone who is not silly, then Braden is not sad.
If there is at least one people who is both not adorable and not silly, then Aubrey is tidy.
If there is at least one people who is not sad, then Braden is silly.
If there is someone who is either thankful or not unusual, then Aubrey is not adorable.
If someone is unusual and not adorable, then he is not thankful, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not sad and silly is always tidy.
If there is at least one people who is not silly, then Stephen is tidy and Rupert is not unusual. | Michael is adorable. | self_contradiction |
Kingsley is not thankful.
Rupert is not thankful.
Braden is not adorable.
Aubrey is not unusual.
Rupert is adorable.
Michael is sad.
Rupert is not unusual.
Gilbert is sad.
Michael is adorable.
Stephen is sad.
Michael is not thankful.
Rupert is sad.Kingsley being not adorable is equivalent to Rupert being not unusual and Gilbert being not tidy.
If Aubrey is adorable, then Michael is sad and Kingsley is silly, and vice versa.
If someone is adorable, then he is silly.
If there is someone who is either sad or not thankful, then Gilbert is silly and Stephen is adorable.
Someone is not adorable and not unusual if and only if he is silly and not tidy.
If there is someone who is not silly, then Braden is not sad.
If there is at least one people who is both not adorable and not silly, then Aubrey is tidy.
If there is at least one people who is not sad, then Braden is silly.
If there is someone who is either thankful or not unusual, then Aubrey is not adorable.
If someone is unusual and not adorable, then he is not thankful, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not sad and silly is always tidy.
If there is at least one people who is not silly, then Stephen is tidy and Rupert is not unusual. | Aubrey is not tidy. | self_contradiction |
Kingsley is not thankful.
Rupert is not thankful.
Braden is not adorable.
Aubrey is not unusual.
Rupert is adorable.
Michael is sad.
Rupert is not unusual.
Gilbert is sad.
Michael is adorable.
Stephen is sad.
Michael is not thankful.
Rupert is sad.Kingsley being not adorable is equivalent to Rupert being not unusual and Gilbert being not tidy.
If Aubrey is adorable, then Michael is sad and Kingsley is silly, and vice versa.
If someone is adorable, then he is silly.
If there is someone who is either sad or not thankful, then Gilbert is silly and Stephen is adorable.
Someone is not adorable and not unusual if and only if he is silly and not tidy.
If there is someone who is not silly, then Braden is not sad.
If there is at least one people who is both not adorable and not silly, then Aubrey is tidy.
If there is at least one people who is not sad, then Braden is silly.
If there is someone who is either thankful or not unusual, then Aubrey is not adorable.
If someone is unusual and not adorable, then he is not thankful, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not sad and silly is always tidy.
If there is at least one people who is not silly, then Stephen is tidy and Rupert is not unusual. | Kingsley is adorable. | contradiction |
Kingsley is not thankful.
Rupert is not thankful.
Braden is not adorable.
Aubrey is not unusual.
Rupert is adorable.
Michael is sad.
Rupert is not unusual.
Gilbert is sad.
Michael is adorable.
Stephen is sad.
Michael is not thankful.
Rupert is sad.Kingsley being not adorable is equivalent to Rupert being not unusual and Gilbert being not tidy.
If Aubrey is adorable, then Michael is sad and Kingsley is silly, and vice versa.
If someone is adorable, then he is silly.
If there is someone who is either sad or not thankful, then Gilbert is silly and Stephen is adorable.
Someone is not adorable and not unusual if and only if he is silly and not tidy.
If there is someone who is not silly, then Braden is not sad.
If there is at least one people who is both not adorable and not silly, then Aubrey is tidy.
If there is at least one people who is not sad, then Braden is silly.
If there is someone who is either thankful or not unusual, then Aubrey is not adorable.
If someone is unusual and not adorable, then he is not thankful, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not sad and silly is always tidy.
If there is at least one people who is not silly, then Stephen is tidy and Rupert is not unusual. | Kingsley is thankful. | contradiction |
Kingsley is not thankful.
Rupert is not thankful.
Braden is not adorable.
Aubrey is not unusual.
Rupert is adorable.
Michael is sad.
Rupert is not unusual.
Gilbert is sad.
Michael is adorable.
Stephen is sad.
Michael is not thankful.
Rupert is sad.Kingsley being not adorable is equivalent to Rupert being not unusual and Gilbert being not tidy.
If Aubrey is adorable, then Michael is sad and Kingsley is silly, and vice versa.
If someone is adorable, then he is silly.
If there is someone who is either sad or not thankful, then Gilbert is silly and Stephen is adorable.
Someone is not adorable and not unusual if and only if he is silly and not tidy.
If there is someone who is not silly, then Braden is not sad.
If there is at least one people who is both not adorable and not silly, then Aubrey is tidy.
If there is at least one people who is not sad, then Braden is silly.
If there is someone who is either thankful or not unusual, then Aubrey is not adorable.
If someone is unusual and not adorable, then he is not thankful, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not sad and silly is always tidy.
If there is at least one people who is not silly, then Stephen is tidy and Rupert is not unusual. | Braden is not thankful. | neutral |
Kingsley is not thankful.
Rupert is not thankful.
Braden is not adorable.
Aubrey is not unusual.
Rupert is adorable.
Michael is sad.
Rupert is not unusual.
Gilbert is sad.
Michael is adorable.
Stephen is sad.
Michael is not thankful.
Rupert is sad.Kingsley being not adorable is equivalent to Rupert being not unusual and Gilbert being not tidy.
If Aubrey is adorable, then Michael is sad and Kingsley is silly, and vice versa.
If someone is adorable, then he is silly.
If there is someone who is either sad or not thankful, then Gilbert is silly and Stephen is adorable.
Someone is not adorable and not unusual if and only if he is silly and not tidy.
If there is someone who is not silly, then Braden is not sad.
If there is at least one people who is both not adorable and not silly, then Aubrey is tidy.
If there is at least one people who is not sad, then Braden is silly.
If there is someone who is either thankful or not unusual, then Aubrey is not adorable.
If someone is unusual and not adorable, then he is not thankful, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not sad and silly is always tidy.
If there is at least one people who is not silly, then Stephen is tidy and Rupert is not unusual. | Rupert is adorable. | self_contradiction |
Kingsley is not thankful.
Rupert is not thankful.
Braden is not adorable.
Aubrey is not unusual.
Rupert is adorable.
Michael is sad.
Rupert is not unusual.
Gilbert is sad.
Michael is adorable.
Stephen is sad.
Michael is not thankful.
Rupert is sad.Kingsley being not adorable is equivalent to Rupert being not unusual and Gilbert being not tidy.
If Aubrey is adorable, then Michael is sad and Kingsley is silly, and vice versa.
If someone is adorable, then he is silly.
If there is someone who is either sad or not thankful, then Gilbert is silly and Stephen is adorable.
Someone is not adorable and not unusual if and only if he is silly and not tidy.
If there is someone who is not silly, then Braden is not sad.
If there is at least one people who is both not adorable and not silly, then Aubrey is tidy.
If there is at least one people who is not sad, then Braden is silly.
If there is someone who is either thankful or not unusual, then Aubrey is not adorable.
If someone is unusual and not adorable, then he is not thankful, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not sad and silly is always tidy.
If there is at least one people who is not silly, then Stephen is tidy and Rupert is not unusual. | Aubrey is not unusual. | entailment |
Kingsley is not thankful.
Rupert is not thankful.
Braden is not adorable.
Aubrey is not unusual.
Rupert is adorable.
Michael is sad.
Rupert is not unusual.
Gilbert is sad.
Michael is adorable.
Stephen is sad.
Michael is not thankful.
Rupert is sad.Kingsley being not adorable is equivalent to Rupert being not unusual and Gilbert being not tidy.
If Aubrey is adorable, then Michael is sad and Kingsley is silly, and vice versa.
If someone is adorable, then he is silly.
If there is someone who is either sad or not thankful, then Gilbert is silly and Stephen is adorable.
Someone is not adorable and not unusual if and only if he is silly and not tidy.
If there is someone who is not silly, then Braden is not sad.
If there is at least one people who is both not adorable and not silly, then Aubrey is tidy.
If there is at least one people who is not sad, then Braden is silly.
If there is someone who is either thankful or not unusual, then Aubrey is not adorable.
If someone is unusual and not adorable, then he is not thankful, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not sad and silly is always tidy.
If there is at least one people who is not silly, then Stephen is tidy and Rupert is not unusual. | Braden is not tidy. | neutral |
Kingsley is not thankful.
Rupert is not thankful.
Braden is not adorable.
Aubrey is not unusual.
Rupert is adorable.
Michael is sad.
Rupert is not unusual.
Gilbert is sad.
Michael is adorable.
Stephen is sad.
Michael is not thankful.
Rupert is sad.Kingsley being not adorable is equivalent to Rupert being not unusual and Gilbert being not tidy.
If Aubrey is adorable, then Michael is sad and Kingsley is silly, and vice versa.
If someone is adorable, then he is silly.
If there is someone who is either sad or not thankful, then Gilbert is silly and Stephen is adorable.
Someone is not adorable and not unusual if and only if he is silly and not tidy.
If there is someone who is not silly, then Braden is not sad.
If there is at least one people who is both not adorable and not silly, then Aubrey is tidy.
If there is at least one people who is not sad, then Braden is silly.
If there is someone who is either thankful or not unusual, then Aubrey is not adorable.
If someone is unusual and not adorable, then he is not thankful, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not sad and silly is always tidy.
If there is at least one people who is not silly, then Stephen is tidy and Rupert is not unusual. | Rupert is not thankful. | entailment |
Kingsley is not thankful.
Rupert is not thankful.
Braden is not adorable.
Aubrey is not unusual.
Rupert is adorable.
Michael is sad.
Rupert is not unusual.
Gilbert is sad.
Michael is adorable.
Stephen is sad.
Michael is not thankful.
Rupert is sad.Kingsley being not adorable is equivalent to Rupert being not unusual and Gilbert being not tidy.
If Aubrey is adorable, then Michael is sad and Kingsley is silly, and vice versa.
If someone is adorable, then he is silly.
If there is someone who is either sad or not thankful, then Gilbert is silly and Stephen is adorable.
Someone is not adorable and not unusual if and only if he is silly and not tidy.
If there is someone who is not silly, then Braden is not sad.
If there is at least one people who is both not adorable and not silly, then Aubrey is tidy.
If there is at least one people who is not sad, then Braden is silly.
If there is someone who is either thankful or not unusual, then Aubrey is not adorable.
If someone is unusual and not adorable, then he is not thankful, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not sad and silly is always tidy.
If there is at least one people who is not silly, then Stephen is tidy and Rupert is not unusual. | Aubrey is not adorable. | entailment |
Kingsley is not thankful.
Rupert is not thankful.
Braden is not adorable.
Aubrey is not unusual.
Rupert is adorable.
Michael is sad.
Rupert is not unusual.
Gilbert is sad.
Michael is adorable.
Stephen is sad.
Michael is not thankful.
Rupert is sad.Kingsley being not adorable is equivalent to Rupert being not unusual and Gilbert being not tidy.
If Aubrey is adorable, then Michael is sad and Kingsley is silly, and vice versa.
If someone is adorable, then he is silly.
If there is someone who is either sad or not thankful, then Gilbert is silly and Stephen is adorable.
Someone is not adorable and not unusual if and only if he is silly and not tidy.
If there is someone who is not silly, then Braden is not sad.
If there is at least one people who is both not adorable and not silly, then Aubrey is tidy.
If there is at least one people who is not sad, then Braden is silly.
If there is someone who is either thankful or not unusual, then Aubrey is not adorable.
If someone is unusual and not adorable, then he is not thankful, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not sad and silly is always tidy.
If there is at least one people who is not silly, then Stephen is tidy and Rupert is not unusual. | Stephen is unusual. | neutral |
Kingsley is not thankful.
Rupert is not thankful.
Braden is not adorable.
Aubrey is not unusual.
Rupert is adorable.
Michael is sad.
Rupert is not unusual.
Gilbert is sad.
Michael is adorable.
Stephen is sad.
Michael is not thankful.
Rupert is sad.Kingsley being not adorable is equivalent to Rupert being not unusual and Gilbert being not tidy.
If Aubrey is adorable, then Michael is sad and Kingsley is silly, and vice versa.
If someone is adorable, then he is silly.
If there is someone who is either sad or not thankful, then Gilbert is silly and Stephen is adorable.
Someone is not adorable and not unusual if and only if he is silly and not tidy.
If there is someone who is not silly, then Braden is not sad.
If there is at least one people who is both not adorable and not silly, then Aubrey is tidy.
If there is at least one people who is not sad, then Braden is silly.
If there is someone who is either thankful or not unusual, then Aubrey is not adorable.
If someone is unusual and not adorable, then he is not thankful, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not sad and silly is always tidy.
If there is at least one people who is not silly, then Stephen is tidy and Rupert is not unusual. | Michael is not tidy. | neutral |
Kingsley is not thankful.
Rupert is not thankful.
Braden is not adorable.
Aubrey is not unusual.
Rupert is adorable.
Michael is sad.
Rupert is not unusual.
Gilbert is sad.
Michael is adorable.
Stephen is sad.
Michael is not thankful.
Rupert is sad.Kingsley being not adorable is equivalent to Rupert being not unusual and Gilbert being not tidy.
If Aubrey is adorable, then Michael is sad and Kingsley is silly, and vice versa.
If someone is adorable, then he is silly.
If there is someone who is either sad or not thankful, then Gilbert is silly and Stephen is adorable.
Someone is not adorable and not unusual if and only if he is silly and not tidy.
If there is someone who is not silly, then Braden is not sad.
If there is at least one people who is both not adorable and not silly, then Aubrey is tidy.
If there is at least one people who is not sad, then Braden is silly.
If there is someone who is either thankful or not unusual, then Aubrey is not adorable.
If someone is unusual and not adorable, then he is not thankful, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not sad and silly is always tidy.
If there is at least one people who is not silly, then Stephen is tidy and Rupert is not unusual. | Gilbert is tidy. | contradiction |
Kingsley is not thankful.
Rupert is not thankful.
Braden is not adorable.
Aubrey is not unusual.
Rupert is adorable.
Michael is sad.
Rupert is not unusual.
Gilbert is sad.
Michael is adorable.
Stephen is sad.
Michael is not thankful.
Rupert is sad.Kingsley being not adorable is equivalent to Rupert being not unusual and Gilbert being not tidy.
If Aubrey is adorable, then Michael is sad and Kingsley is silly, and vice versa.
If someone is adorable, then he is silly.
If there is someone who is either sad or not thankful, then Gilbert is silly and Stephen is adorable.
Someone is not adorable and not unusual if and only if he is silly and not tidy.
If there is someone who is not silly, then Braden is not sad.
If there is at least one people who is both not adorable and not silly, then Aubrey is tidy.
If there is at least one people who is not sad, then Braden is silly.
If there is someone who is either thankful or not unusual, then Aubrey is not adorable.
If someone is unusual and not adorable, then he is not thankful, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not sad and silly is always tidy.
If there is at least one people who is not silly, then Stephen is tidy and Rupert is not unusual. | Aubrey is tidy. | self_contradiction |
Kingsley is not thankful.
Rupert is not thankful.
Braden is not adorable.
Aubrey is not unusual.
Rupert is adorable.
Michael is sad.
Rupert is not unusual.
Gilbert is sad.
Michael is adorable.
Stephen is sad.
Michael is not thankful.
Rupert is sad.Kingsley being not adorable is equivalent to Rupert being not unusual and Gilbert being not tidy.
If Aubrey is adorable, then Michael is sad and Kingsley is silly, and vice versa.
If someone is adorable, then he is silly.
If there is someone who is either sad or not thankful, then Gilbert is silly and Stephen is adorable.
Someone is not adorable and not unusual if and only if he is silly and not tidy.
If there is someone who is not silly, then Braden is not sad.
If there is at least one people who is both not adorable and not silly, then Aubrey is tidy.
If there is at least one people who is not sad, then Braden is silly.
If there is someone who is either thankful or not unusual, then Aubrey is not adorable.
If someone is unusual and not adorable, then he is not thankful, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not sad and silly is always tidy.
If there is at least one people who is not silly, then Stephen is tidy and Rupert is not unusual. | Michael is not silly. | contradiction |
Kingsley is not thankful.
Rupert is not thankful.
Braden is not adorable.
Aubrey is not unusual.
Rupert is adorable.
Michael is sad.
Rupert is not unusual.
Gilbert is sad.
Michael is adorable.
Stephen is sad.
Michael is not thankful.
Rupert is sad.Kingsley being not adorable is equivalent to Rupert being not unusual and Gilbert being not tidy.
If Aubrey is adorable, then Michael is sad and Kingsley is silly, and vice versa.
If someone is adorable, then he is silly.
If there is someone who is either sad or not thankful, then Gilbert is silly and Stephen is adorable.
Someone is not adorable and not unusual if and only if he is silly and not tidy.
If there is someone who is not silly, then Braden is not sad.
If there is at least one people who is both not adorable and not silly, then Aubrey is tidy.
If there is at least one people who is not sad, then Braden is silly.
If there is someone who is either thankful or not unusual, then Aubrey is not adorable.
If someone is unusual and not adorable, then he is not thankful, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not sad and silly is always tidy.
If there is at least one people who is not silly, then Stephen is tidy and Rupert is not unusual. | Aubrey is silly. | entailment |
Kingsley is not thankful.
Rupert is not thankful.
Braden is not adorable.
Aubrey is not unusual.
Rupert is adorable.
Michael is sad.
Rupert is not unusual.
Gilbert is sad.
Michael is adorable.
Stephen is sad.
Michael is not thankful.
Rupert is sad.Kingsley being not adorable is equivalent to Rupert being not unusual and Gilbert being not tidy.
If Aubrey is adorable, then Michael is sad and Kingsley is silly, and vice versa.
If someone is adorable, then he is silly.
If there is someone who is either sad or not thankful, then Gilbert is silly and Stephen is adorable.
Someone is not adorable and not unusual if and only if he is silly and not tidy.
If there is someone who is not silly, then Braden is not sad.
If there is at least one people who is both not adorable and not silly, then Aubrey is tidy.
If there is at least one people who is not sad, then Braden is silly.
If there is someone who is either thankful or not unusual, then Aubrey is not adorable.
If someone is unusual and not adorable, then he is not thankful, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not sad and silly is always tidy.
If there is at least one people who is not silly, then Stephen is tidy and Rupert is not unusual. | Braden is sad. | neutral |
Kingsley is not thankful.
Rupert is not thankful.
Braden is not adorable.
Aubrey is not unusual.
Rupert is adorable.
Michael is sad.
Rupert is not unusual.
Gilbert is sad.
Michael is adorable.
Stephen is sad.
Michael is not thankful.
Rupert is sad.Kingsley being not adorable is equivalent to Rupert being not unusual and Gilbert being not tidy.
If Aubrey is adorable, then Michael is sad and Kingsley is silly, and vice versa.
If someone is adorable, then he is silly.
If there is someone who is either sad or not thankful, then Gilbert is silly and Stephen is adorable.
Someone is not adorable and not unusual if and only if he is silly and not tidy.
If there is someone who is not silly, then Braden is not sad.
If there is at least one people who is both not adorable and not silly, then Aubrey is tidy.
If there is at least one people who is not sad, then Braden is silly.
If there is someone who is either thankful or not unusual, then Aubrey is not adorable.
If someone is unusual and not adorable, then he is not thankful, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not sad and silly is always tidy.
If there is at least one people who is not silly, then Stephen is tidy and Rupert is not unusual. | Braden is adorable. | contradiction |
Kingsley is not thankful.
Rupert is not thankful.
Braden is not adorable.
Aubrey is not unusual.
Rupert is adorable.
Michael is sad.
Rupert is not unusual.
Gilbert is sad.
Michael is adorable.
Stephen is sad.
Michael is not thankful.
Rupert is sad.Kingsley being not adorable is equivalent to Rupert being not unusual and Gilbert being not tidy.
If Aubrey is adorable, then Michael is sad and Kingsley is silly, and vice versa.
If someone is adorable, then he is silly.
If there is someone who is either sad or not thankful, then Gilbert is silly and Stephen is adorable.
Someone is not adorable and not unusual if and only if he is silly and not tidy.
If there is someone who is not silly, then Braden is not sad.
If there is at least one people who is both not adorable and not silly, then Aubrey is tidy.
If there is at least one people who is not sad, then Braden is silly.
If there is someone who is either thankful or not unusual, then Aubrey is not adorable.
If someone is unusual and not adorable, then he is not thankful, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not sad and silly is always tidy.
If there is at least one people who is not silly, then Stephen is tidy and Rupert is not unusual. | Michael is not adorable. | self_contradiction |
Kingsley is not thankful.
Rupert is not thankful.
Braden is not adorable.
Aubrey is not unusual.
Rupert is adorable.
Michael is sad.
Rupert is not unusual.
Gilbert is sad.
Michael is adorable.
Stephen is sad.
Michael is not thankful.
Rupert is sad.Kingsley being not adorable is equivalent to Rupert being not unusual and Gilbert being not tidy.
If Aubrey is adorable, then Michael is sad and Kingsley is silly, and vice versa.
If someone is adorable, then he is silly.
If there is someone who is either sad or not thankful, then Gilbert is silly and Stephen is adorable.
Someone is not adorable and not unusual if and only if he is silly and not tidy.
If there is someone who is not silly, then Braden is not sad.
If there is at least one people who is both not adorable and not silly, then Aubrey is tidy.
If there is at least one people who is not sad, then Braden is silly.
If there is someone who is either thankful or not unusual, then Aubrey is not adorable.
If someone is unusual and not adorable, then he is not thankful, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not sad and silly is always tidy.
If there is at least one people who is not silly, then Stephen is tidy and Rupert is not unusual. | Stephen is sad. | entailment |
Bert is frightened.
Percival is not annoying.
Hubert is annoying.
Douglas is not crazy.
Cecil is cooperative.
Percival is crazy.
Heath is light.
Douglas is light.
Percival is not frightened.
Douglas is cool.
Heath is not crazy.
Douglas is frightened.If there is someone who is either not crazy or light, then Hubert is annoying.
It can be concluded that Percival is frightened once knowing that Bert is cooperative or Douglas is crazy.
Someone is not crazy if and only if he is cooperative.
If there is someone who is not light, then Percival is not cooperative and Cecil is not cool.
If there is someone who is annoying, then Hubert is not light and Cecil is not cool.
Heath is light if and only if Keegan is not crazy.
If someone is frightened and crazy, then he is light, and vice versa.
If Hubert is annoying, then Heath is not cooperative and Douglas is not crazy.
Heath being cooperative is equivalent to Heath being not frightened and Cecil being annoying.
Someone who is both not annoying and not cool is always not crazy.
Keegan is not annoying if and only if Douglas is crazy and Hubert is not cool.
If there is someone who is either cooperative or not crazy, then Bert is annoying and Douglas is not cool. | Bert is not frightened. | contradiction |
Bert is frightened.
Percival is not annoying.
Hubert is annoying.
Douglas is not crazy.
Cecil is cooperative.
Percival is crazy.
Heath is light.
Douglas is light.
Percival is not frightened.
Douglas is cool.
Heath is not crazy.
Douglas is frightened.If there is someone who is either not crazy or light, then Hubert is annoying.
It can be concluded that Percival is frightened once knowing that Bert is cooperative or Douglas is crazy.
Someone is not crazy if and only if he is cooperative.
If there is someone who is not light, then Percival is not cooperative and Cecil is not cool.
If there is someone who is annoying, then Hubert is not light and Cecil is not cool.
Heath is light if and only if Keegan is not crazy.
If someone is frightened and crazy, then he is light, and vice versa.
If Hubert is annoying, then Heath is not cooperative and Douglas is not crazy.
Heath being cooperative is equivalent to Heath being not frightened and Cecil being annoying.
Someone who is both not annoying and not cool is always not crazy.
Keegan is not annoying if and only if Douglas is crazy and Hubert is not cool.
If there is someone who is either cooperative or not crazy, then Bert is annoying and Douglas is not cool. | Heath is not crazy. | self_contradiction |
Bert is frightened.
Percival is not annoying.
Hubert is annoying.
Douglas is not crazy.
Cecil is cooperative.
Percival is crazy.
Heath is light.
Douglas is light.
Percival is not frightened.
Douglas is cool.
Heath is not crazy.
Douglas is frightened.If there is someone who is either not crazy or light, then Hubert is annoying.
It can be concluded that Percival is frightened once knowing that Bert is cooperative or Douglas is crazy.
Someone is not crazy if and only if he is cooperative.
If there is someone who is not light, then Percival is not cooperative and Cecil is not cool.
If there is someone who is annoying, then Hubert is not light and Cecil is not cool.
Heath is light if and only if Keegan is not crazy.
If someone is frightened and crazy, then he is light, and vice versa.
If Hubert is annoying, then Heath is not cooperative and Douglas is not crazy.
Heath being cooperative is equivalent to Heath being not frightened and Cecil being annoying.
Someone who is both not annoying and not cool is always not crazy.
Keegan is not annoying if and only if Douglas is crazy and Hubert is not cool.
If there is someone who is either cooperative or not crazy, then Bert is annoying and Douglas is not cool. | Douglas is cool. | self_contradiction |
Bert is frightened.
Percival is not annoying.
Hubert is annoying.
Douglas is not crazy.
Cecil is cooperative.
Percival is crazy.
Heath is light.
Douglas is light.
Percival is not frightened.
Douglas is cool.
Heath is not crazy.
Douglas is frightened.If there is someone who is either not crazy or light, then Hubert is annoying.
It can be concluded that Percival is frightened once knowing that Bert is cooperative or Douglas is crazy.
Someone is not crazy if and only if he is cooperative.
If there is someone who is not light, then Percival is not cooperative and Cecil is not cool.
If there is someone who is annoying, then Hubert is not light and Cecil is not cool.
Heath is light if and only if Keegan is not crazy.
If someone is frightened and crazy, then he is light, and vice versa.
If Hubert is annoying, then Heath is not cooperative and Douglas is not crazy.
Heath being cooperative is equivalent to Heath being not frightened and Cecil being annoying.
Someone who is both not annoying and not cool is always not crazy.
Keegan is not annoying if and only if Douglas is crazy and Hubert is not cool.
If there is someone who is either cooperative or not crazy, then Bert is annoying and Douglas is not cool. | Bert is crazy. | neutral |
Bert is frightened.
Percival is not annoying.
Hubert is annoying.
Douglas is not crazy.
Cecil is cooperative.
Percival is crazy.
Heath is light.
Douglas is light.
Percival is not frightened.
Douglas is cool.
Heath is not crazy.
Douglas is frightened.If there is someone who is either not crazy or light, then Hubert is annoying.
It can be concluded that Percival is frightened once knowing that Bert is cooperative or Douglas is crazy.
Someone is not crazy if and only if he is cooperative.
If there is someone who is not light, then Percival is not cooperative and Cecil is not cool.
If there is someone who is annoying, then Hubert is not light and Cecil is not cool.
Heath is light if and only if Keegan is not crazy.
If someone is frightened and crazy, then he is light, and vice versa.
If Hubert is annoying, then Heath is not cooperative and Douglas is not crazy.
Heath being cooperative is equivalent to Heath being not frightened and Cecil being annoying.
Someone who is both not annoying and not cool is always not crazy.
Keegan is not annoying if and only if Douglas is crazy and Hubert is not cool.
If there is someone who is either cooperative or not crazy, then Bert is annoying and Douglas is not cool. | Bert is cooperative. | neutral |
Bert is frightened.
Percival is not annoying.
Hubert is annoying.
Douglas is not crazy.
Cecil is cooperative.
Percival is crazy.
Heath is light.
Douglas is light.
Percival is not frightened.
Douglas is cool.
Heath is not crazy.
Douglas is frightened.If there is someone who is either not crazy or light, then Hubert is annoying.
It can be concluded that Percival is frightened once knowing that Bert is cooperative or Douglas is crazy.
Someone is not crazy if and only if he is cooperative.
If there is someone who is not light, then Percival is not cooperative and Cecil is not cool.
If there is someone who is annoying, then Hubert is not light and Cecil is not cool.
Heath is light if and only if Keegan is not crazy.
If someone is frightened and crazy, then he is light, and vice versa.
If Hubert is annoying, then Heath is not cooperative and Douglas is not crazy.
Heath being cooperative is equivalent to Heath being not frightened and Cecil being annoying.
Someone who is both not annoying and not cool is always not crazy.
Keegan is not annoying if and only if Douglas is crazy and Hubert is not cool.
If there is someone who is either cooperative or not crazy, then Bert is annoying and Douglas is not cool. | Percival is crazy. | entailment |
Bert is frightened.
Percival is not annoying.
Hubert is annoying.
Douglas is not crazy.
Cecil is cooperative.
Percival is crazy.
Heath is light.
Douglas is light.
Percival is not frightened.
Douglas is cool.
Heath is not crazy.
Douglas is frightened.If there is someone who is either not crazy or light, then Hubert is annoying.
It can be concluded that Percival is frightened once knowing that Bert is cooperative or Douglas is crazy.
Someone is not crazy if and only if he is cooperative.
If there is someone who is not light, then Percival is not cooperative and Cecil is not cool.
If there is someone who is annoying, then Hubert is not light and Cecil is not cool.
Heath is light if and only if Keegan is not crazy.
If someone is frightened and crazy, then he is light, and vice versa.
If Hubert is annoying, then Heath is not cooperative and Douglas is not crazy.
Heath being cooperative is equivalent to Heath being not frightened and Cecil being annoying.
Someone who is both not annoying and not cool is always not crazy.
Keegan is not annoying if and only if Douglas is crazy and Hubert is not cool.
If there is someone who is either cooperative or not crazy, then Bert is annoying and Douglas is not cool. | Heath is not light. | contradiction |
Bert is frightened.
Percival is not annoying.
Hubert is annoying.
Douglas is not crazy.
Cecil is cooperative.
Percival is crazy.
Heath is light.
Douglas is light.
Percival is not frightened.
Douglas is cool.
Heath is not crazy.
Douglas is frightened.If there is someone who is either not crazy or light, then Hubert is annoying.
It can be concluded that Percival is frightened once knowing that Bert is cooperative or Douglas is crazy.
Someone is not crazy if and only if he is cooperative.
If there is someone who is not light, then Percival is not cooperative and Cecil is not cool.
If there is someone who is annoying, then Hubert is not light and Cecil is not cool.
Heath is light if and only if Keegan is not crazy.
If someone is frightened and crazy, then he is light, and vice versa.
If Hubert is annoying, then Heath is not cooperative and Douglas is not crazy.
Heath being cooperative is equivalent to Heath being not frightened and Cecil being annoying.
Someone who is both not annoying and not cool is always not crazy.
Keegan is not annoying if and only if Douglas is crazy and Hubert is not cool.
If there is someone who is either cooperative or not crazy, then Bert is annoying and Douglas is not cool. | Keegan is not cool. | neutral |
Bert is frightened.
Percival is not annoying.
Hubert is annoying.
Douglas is not crazy.
Cecil is cooperative.
Percival is crazy.
Heath is light.
Douglas is light.
Percival is not frightened.
Douglas is cool.
Heath is not crazy.
Douglas is frightened.If there is someone who is either not crazy or light, then Hubert is annoying.
It can be concluded that Percival is frightened once knowing that Bert is cooperative or Douglas is crazy.
Someone is not crazy if and only if he is cooperative.
If there is someone who is not light, then Percival is not cooperative and Cecil is not cool.
If there is someone who is annoying, then Hubert is not light and Cecil is not cool.
Heath is light if and only if Keegan is not crazy.
If someone is frightened and crazy, then he is light, and vice versa.
If Hubert is annoying, then Heath is not cooperative and Douglas is not crazy.
Heath being cooperative is equivalent to Heath being not frightened and Cecil being annoying.
Someone who is both not annoying and not cool is always not crazy.
Keegan is not annoying if and only if Douglas is crazy and Hubert is not cool.
If there is someone who is either cooperative or not crazy, then Bert is annoying and Douglas is not cool. | Cecil is not annoying. | contradiction |
Bert is frightened.
Percival is not annoying.
Hubert is annoying.
Douglas is not crazy.
Cecil is cooperative.
Percival is crazy.
Heath is light.
Douglas is light.
Percival is not frightened.
Douglas is cool.
Heath is not crazy.
Douglas is frightened.If there is someone who is either not crazy or light, then Hubert is annoying.
It can be concluded that Percival is frightened once knowing that Bert is cooperative or Douglas is crazy.
Someone is not crazy if and only if he is cooperative.
If there is someone who is not light, then Percival is not cooperative and Cecil is not cool.
If there is someone who is annoying, then Hubert is not light and Cecil is not cool.
Heath is light if and only if Keegan is not crazy.
If someone is frightened and crazy, then he is light, and vice versa.
If Hubert is annoying, then Heath is not cooperative and Douglas is not crazy.
Heath being cooperative is equivalent to Heath being not frightened and Cecil being annoying.
Someone who is both not annoying and not cool is always not crazy.
Keegan is not annoying if and only if Douglas is crazy and Hubert is not cool.
If there is someone who is either cooperative or not crazy, then Bert is annoying and Douglas is not cool. | Cecil is not crazy. | entailment |
Bert is frightened.
Percival is not annoying.
Hubert is annoying.
Douglas is not crazy.
Cecil is cooperative.
Percival is crazy.
Heath is light.
Douglas is light.
Percival is not frightened.
Douglas is cool.
Heath is not crazy.
Douglas is frightened.If there is someone who is either not crazy or light, then Hubert is annoying.
It can be concluded that Percival is frightened once knowing that Bert is cooperative or Douglas is crazy.
Someone is not crazy if and only if he is cooperative.
If there is someone who is not light, then Percival is not cooperative and Cecil is not cool.
If there is someone who is annoying, then Hubert is not light and Cecil is not cool.
Heath is light if and only if Keegan is not crazy.
If someone is frightened and crazy, then he is light, and vice versa.
If Hubert is annoying, then Heath is not cooperative and Douglas is not crazy.
Heath being cooperative is equivalent to Heath being not frightened and Cecil being annoying.
Someone who is both not annoying and not cool is always not crazy.
Keegan is not annoying if and only if Douglas is crazy and Hubert is not cool.
If there is someone who is either cooperative or not crazy, then Bert is annoying and Douglas is not cool. | Percival is frightened. | self_contradiction |
Bert is frightened.
Percival is not annoying.
Hubert is annoying.
Douglas is not crazy.
Cecil is cooperative.
Percival is crazy.
Heath is light.
Douglas is light.
Percival is not frightened.
Douglas is cool.
Heath is not crazy.
Douglas is frightened.If there is someone who is either not crazy or light, then Hubert is annoying.
It can be concluded that Percival is frightened once knowing that Bert is cooperative or Douglas is crazy.
Someone is not crazy if and only if he is cooperative.
If there is someone who is not light, then Percival is not cooperative and Cecil is not cool.
If there is someone who is annoying, then Hubert is not light and Cecil is not cool.
Heath is light if and only if Keegan is not crazy.
If someone is frightened and crazy, then he is light, and vice versa.
If Hubert is annoying, then Heath is not cooperative and Douglas is not crazy.
Heath being cooperative is equivalent to Heath being not frightened and Cecil being annoying.
Someone who is both not annoying and not cool is always not crazy.
Keegan is not annoying if and only if Douglas is crazy and Hubert is not cool.
If there is someone who is either cooperative or not crazy, then Bert is annoying and Douglas is not cool. | Cecil is annoying. | entailment |
Bert is frightened.
Percival is not annoying.
Hubert is annoying.
Douglas is not crazy.
Cecil is cooperative.
Percival is crazy.
Heath is light.
Douglas is light.
Percival is not frightened.
Douglas is cool.
Heath is not crazy.
Douglas is frightened.If there is someone who is either not crazy or light, then Hubert is annoying.
It can be concluded that Percival is frightened once knowing that Bert is cooperative or Douglas is crazy.
Someone is not crazy if and only if he is cooperative.
If there is someone who is not light, then Percival is not cooperative and Cecil is not cool.
If there is someone who is annoying, then Hubert is not light and Cecil is not cool.
Heath is light if and only if Keegan is not crazy.
If someone is frightened and crazy, then he is light, and vice versa.
If Hubert is annoying, then Heath is not cooperative and Douglas is not crazy.
Heath being cooperative is equivalent to Heath being not frightened and Cecil being annoying.
Someone who is both not annoying and not cool is always not crazy.
Keegan is not annoying if and only if Douglas is crazy and Hubert is not cool.
If there is someone who is either cooperative or not crazy, then Bert is annoying and Douglas is not cool. | Hubert is light. | contradiction |
Bert is frightened.
Percival is not annoying.
Hubert is annoying.
Douglas is not crazy.
Cecil is cooperative.
Percival is crazy.
Heath is light.
Douglas is light.
Percival is not frightened.
Douglas is cool.
Heath is not crazy.
Douglas is frightened.If there is someone who is either not crazy or light, then Hubert is annoying.
It can be concluded that Percival is frightened once knowing that Bert is cooperative or Douglas is crazy.
Someone is not crazy if and only if he is cooperative.
If there is someone who is not light, then Percival is not cooperative and Cecil is not cool.
If there is someone who is annoying, then Hubert is not light and Cecil is not cool.
Heath is light if and only if Keegan is not crazy.
If someone is frightened and crazy, then he is light, and vice versa.
If Hubert is annoying, then Heath is not cooperative and Douglas is not crazy.
Heath being cooperative is equivalent to Heath being not frightened and Cecil being annoying.
Someone who is both not annoying and not cool is always not crazy.
Keegan is not annoying if and only if Douglas is crazy and Hubert is not cool.
If there is someone who is either cooperative or not crazy, then Bert is annoying and Douglas is not cool. | Cecil is not frightened. | neutral |
Bert is frightened.
Percival is not annoying.
Hubert is annoying.
Douglas is not crazy.
Cecil is cooperative.
Percival is crazy.
Heath is light.
Douglas is light.
Percival is not frightened.
Douglas is cool.
Heath is not crazy.
Douglas is frightened.If there is someone who is either not crazy or light, then Hubert is annoying.
It can be concluded that Percival is frightened once knowing that Bert is cooperative or Douglas is crazy.
Someone is not crazy if and only if he is cooperative.
If there is someone who is not light, then Percival is not cooperative and Cecil is not cool.
If there is someone who is annoying, then Hubert is not light and Cecil is not cool.
Heath is light if and only if Keegan is not crazy.
If someone is frightened and crazy, then he is light, and vice versa.
If Hubert is annoying, then Heath is not cooperative and Douglas is not crazy.
Heath being cooperative is equivalent to Heath being not frightened and Cecil being annoying.
Someone who is both not annoying and not cool is always not crazy.
Keegan is not annoying if and only if Douglas is crazy and Hubert is not cool.
If there is someone who is either cooperative or not crazy, then Bert is annoying and Douglas is not cool. | Douglas is crazy. | self_contradiction |
Bert is frightened.
Percival is not annoying.
Hubert is annoying.
Douglas is not crazy.
Cecil is cooperative.
Percival is crazy.
Heath is light.
Douglas is light.
Percival is not frightened.
Douglas is cool.
Heath is not crazy.
Douglas is frightened.If there is someone who is either not crazy or light, then Hubert is annoying.
It can be concluded that Percival is frightened once knowing that Bert is cooperative or Douglas is crazy.
Someone is not crazy if and only if he is cooperative.
If there is someone who is not light, then Percival is not cooperative and Cecil is not cool.
If there is someone who is annoying, then Hubert is not light and Cecil is not cool.
Heath is light if and only if Keegan is not crazy.
If someone is frightened and crazy, then he is light, and vice versa.
If Hubert is annoying, then Heath is not cooperative and Douglas is not crazy.
Heath being cooperative is equivalent to Heath being not frightened and Cecil being annoying.
Someone who is both not annoying and not cool is always not crazy.
Keegan is not annoying if and only if Douglas is crazy and Hubert is not cool.
If there is someone who is either cooperative or not crazy, then Bert is annoying and Douglas is not cool. | Hubert is not annoying. | contradiction |
Bert is frightened.
Percival is not annoying.
Hubert is annoying.
Douglas is not crazy.
Cecil is cooperative.
Percival is crazy.
Heath is light.
Douglas is light.
Percival is not frightened.
Douglas is cool.
Heath is not crazy.
Douglas is frightened.If there is someone who is either not crazy or light, then Hubert is annoying.
It can be concluded that Percival is frightened once knowing that Bert is cooperative or Douglas is crazy.
Someone is not crazy if and only if he is cooperative.
If there is someone who is not light, then Percival is not cooperative and Cecil is not cool.
If there is someone who is annoying, then Hubert is not light and Cecil is not cool.
Heath is light if and only if Keegan is not crazy.
If someone is frightened and crazy, then he is light, and vice versa.
If Hubert is annoying, then Heath is not cooperative and Douglas is not crazy.
Heath being cooperative is equivalent to Heath being not frightened and Cecil being annoying.
Someone who is both not annoying and not cool is always not crazy.
Keegan is not annoying if and only if Douglas is crazy and Hubert is not cool.
If there is someone who is either cooperative or not crazy, then Bert is annoying and Douglas is not cool. | Douglas is not cool. | self_contradiction |
Bert is frightened.
Percival is not annoying.
Hubert is annoying.
Douglas is not crazy.
Cecil is cooperative.
Percival is crazy.
Heath is light.
Douglas is light.
Percival is not frightened.
Douglas is cool.
Heath is not crazy.
Douglas is frightened.If there is someone who is either not crazy or light, then Hubert is annoying.
It can be concluded that Percival is frightened once knowing that Bert is cooperative or Douglas is crazy.
Someone is not crazy if and only if he is cooperative.
If there is someone who is not light, then Percival is not cooperative and Cecil is not cool.
If there is someone who is annoying, then Hubert is not light and Cecil is not cool.
Heath is light if and only if Keegan is not crazy.
If someone is frightened and crazy, then he is light, and vice versa.
If Hubert is annoying, then Heath is not cooperative and Douglas is not crazy.
Heath being cooperative is equivalent to Heath being not frightened and Cecil being annoying.
Someone who is both not annoying and not cool is always not crazy.
Keegan is not annoying if and only if Douglas is crazy and Hubert is not cool.
If there is someone who is either cooperative or not crazy, then Bert is annoying and Douglas is not cool. | Douglas is not annoying. | neutral |
Bert is frightened.
Percival is not annoying.
Hubert is annoying.
Douglas is not crazy.
Cecil is cooperative.
Percival is crazy.
Heath is light.
Douglas is light.
Percival is not frightened.
Douglas is cool.
Heath is not crazy.
Douglas is frightened.If there is someone who is either not crazy or light, then Hubert is annoying.
It can be concluded that Percival is frightened once knowing that Bert is cooperative or Douglas is crazy.
Someone is not crazy if and only if he is cooperative.
If there is someone who is not light, then Percival is not cooperative and Cecil is not cool.
If there is someone who is annoying, then Hubert is not light and Cecil is not cool.
Heath is light if and only if Keegan is not crazy.
If someone is frightened and crazy, then he is light, and vice versa.
If Hubert is annoying, then Heath is not cooperative and Douglas is not crazy.
Heath being cooperative is equivalent to Heath being not frightened and Cecil being annoying.
Someone who is both not annoying and not cool is always not crazy.
Keegan is not annoying if and only if Douglas is crazy and Hubert is not cool.
If there is someone who is either cooperative or not crazy, then Bert is annoying and Douglas is not cool. | Cecil is cooperative. | entailment |
Bert is frightened.
Percival is not annoying.
Hubert is annoying.
Douglas is not crazy.
Cecil is cooperative.
Percival is crazy.
Heath is light.
Douglas is light.
Percival is not frightened.
Douglas is cool.
Heath is not crazy.
Douglas is frightened.If there is someone who is either not crazy or light, then Hubert is annoying.
It can be concluded that Percival is frightened once knowing that Bert is cooperative or Douglas is crazy.
Someone is not crazy if and only if he is cooperative.
If there is someone who is not light, then Percival is not cooperative and Cecil is not cool.
If there is someone who is annoying, then Hubert is not light and Cecil is not cool.
Heath is light if and only if Keegan is not crazy.
If someone is frightened and crazy, then he is light, and vice versa.
If Hubert is annoying, then Heath is not cooperative and Douglas is not crazy.
Heath being cooperative is equivalent to Heath being not frightened and Cecil being annoying.
Someone who is both not annoying and not cool is always not crazy.
Keegan is not annoying if and only if Douglas is crazy and Hubert is not cool.
If there is someone who is either cooperative or not crazy, then Bert is annoying and Douglas is not cool. | Keegan is cooperative. | entailment |
Quade is lucky.
Rick is lucky.
Coleman is elderly.
Lucille is not traditional.
Coleman is traditional.
Gilbert is environmental.
Lucille is not elderly.
Boris is environmental.
Marvin is not nice.
Coleman is not nice.
Lucille is environmental.
Gilbert is not traditional.Someone being both not elderly and traditional is equivalent to being lucky.
If someone is not traditional and not lucky, then he is not stormy, and vice versa.
Lucille is not elderly and Rick is environmental if and only if Marvin is stormy and Gilbert is not traditional.
All not lucky people are not traditional.
If there is at least one people who is nice or lucky, then Gilbert is environmental.
If someone is lucky, then he is traditional, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not stormy or elderly, then Quade is lucky.
It can be concluded that Quade is stormy once knowing that Coleman is nice and Rick is not lucky.
Someone is stormy and lucky if and only if he is environmental and not elderly.
If there is at least one people who is elderly, then Boris is traditional and Quade is not stormy.
Someone who is elderly is always not nice.
If someone is not environmental or he is traditional, then he is nice. | Marvin is not lucky. | neutral |
Quade is lucky.
Rick is lucky.
Coleman is elderly.
Lucille is not traditional.
Coleman is traditional.
Gilbert is environmental.
Lucille is not elderly.
Boris is environmental.
Marvin is not nice.
Coleman is not nice.
Lucille is environmental.
Gilbert is not traditional.Someone being both not elderly and traditional is equivalent to being lucky.
If someone is not traditional and not lucky, then he is not stormy, and vice versa.
Lucille is not elderly and Rick is environmental if and only if Marvin is stormy and Gilbert is not traditional.
All not lucky people are not traditional.
If there is at least one people who is nice or lucky, then Gilbert is environmental.
If someone is lucky, then he is traditional, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not stormy or elderly, then Quade is lucky.
It can be concluded that Quade is stormy once knowing that Coleman is nice and Rick is not lucky.
Someone is stormy and lucky if and only if he is environmental and not elderly.
If there is at least one people who is elderly, then Boris is traditional and Quade is not stormy.
Someone who is elderly is always not nice.
If someone is not environmental or he is traditional, then he is nice. | Boris is not environmental. | contradiction |
Quade is lucky.
Rick is lucky.
Coleman is elderly.
Lucille is not traditional.
Coleman is traditional.
Gilbert is environmental.
Lucille is not elderly.
Boris is environmental.
Marvin is not nice.
Coleman is not nice.
Lucille is environmental.
Gilbert is not traditional.Someone being both not elderly and traditional is equivalent to being lucky.
If someone is not traditional and not lucky, then he is not stormy, and vice versa.
Lucille is not elderly and Rick is environmental if and only if Marvin is stormy and Gilbert is not traditional.
All not lucky people are not traditional.
If there is at least one people who is nice or lucky, then Gilbert is environmental.
If someone is lucky, then he is traditional, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not stormy or elderly, then Quade is lucky.
It can be concluded that Quade is stormy once knowing that Coleman is nice and Rick is not lucky.
Someone is stormy and lucky if and only if he is environmental and not elderly.
If there is at least one people who is elderly, then Boris is traditional and Quade is not stormy.
Someone who is elderly is always not nice.
If someone is not environmental or he is traditional, then he is nice. | Quade is stormy. | contradiction |
Quade is lucky.
Rick is lucky.
Coleman is elderly.
Lucille is not traditional.
Coleman is traditional.
Gilbert is environmental.
Lucille is not elderly.
Boris is environmental.
Marvin is not nice.
Coleman is not nice.
Lucille is environmental.
Gilbert is not traditional.Someone being both not elderly and traditional is equivalent to being lucky.
If someone is not traditional and not lucky, then he is not stormy, and vice versa.
Lucille is not elderly and Rick is environmental if and only if Marvin is stormy and Gilbert is not traditional.
All not lucky people are not traditional.
If there is at least one people who is nice or lucky, then Gilbert is environmental.
If someone is lucky, then he is traditional, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not stormy or elderly, then Quade is lucky.
It can be concluded that Quade is stormy once knowing that Coleman is nice and Rick is not lucky.
Someone is stormy and lucky if and only if he is environmental and not elderly.
If there is at least one people who is elderly, then Boris is traditional and Quade is not stormy.
Someone who is elderly is always not nice.
If someone is not environmental or he is traditional, then he is nice. | Gilbert is not environmental. | contradiction |
Quade is lucky.
Rick is lucky.
Coleman is elderly.
Lucille is not traditional.
Coleman is traditional.
Gilbert is environmental.
Lucille is not elderly.
Boris is environmental.
Marvin is not nice.
Coleman is not nice.
Lucille is environmental.
Gilbert is not traditional.Someone being both not elderly and traditional is equivalent to being lucky.
If someone is not traditional and not lucky, then he is not stormy, and vice versa.
Lucille is not elderly and Rick is environmental if and only if Marvin is stormy and Gilbert is not traditional.
All not lucky people are not traditional.
If there is at least one people who is nice or lucky, then Gilbert is environmental.
If someone is lucky, then he is traditional, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not stormy or elderly, then Quade is lucky.
It can be concluded that Quade is stormy once knowing that Coleman is nice and Rick is not lucky.
Someone is stormy and lucky if and only if he is environmental and not elderly.
If there is at least one people who is elderly, then Boris is traditional and Quade is not stormy.
Someone who is elderly is always not nice.
If someone is not environmental or he is traditional, then he is nice. | Lucille is nice. | entailment |
Quade is lucky.
Rick is lucky.
Coleman is elderly.
Lucille is not traditional.
Coleman is traditional.
Gilbert is environmental.
Lucille is not elderly.
Boris is environmental.
Marvin is not nice.
Coleman is not nice.
Lucille is environmental.
Gilbert is not traditional.Someone being both not elderly and traditional is equivalent to being lucky.
If someone is not traditional and not lucky, then he is not stormy, and vice versa.
Lucille is not elderly and Rick is environmental if and only if Marvin is stormy and Gilbert is not traditional.
All not lucky people are not traditional.
If there is at least one people who is nice or lucky, then Gilbert is environmental.
If someone is lucky, then he is traditional, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not stormy or elderly, then Quade is lucky.
It can be concluded that Quade is stormy once knowing that Coleman is nice and Rick is not lucky.
Someone is stormy and lucky if and only if he is environmental and not elderly.
If there is at least one people who is elderly, then Boris is traditional and Quade is not stormy.
Someone who is elderly is always not nice.
If someone is not environmental or he is traditional, then he is nice. | Lucille is traditional. | self_contradiction |
Quade is lucky.
Rick is lucky.
Coleman is elderly.
Lucille is not traditional.
Coleman is traditional.
Gilbert is environmental.
Lucille is not elderly.
Boris is environmental.
Marvin is not nice.
Coleman is not nice.
Lucille is environmental.
Gilbert is not traditional.Someone being both not elderly and traditional is equivalent to being lucky.
If someone is not traditional and not lucky, then he is not stormy, and vice versa.
Lucille is not elderly and Rick is environmental if and only if Marvin is stormy and Gilbert is not traditional.
All not lucky people are not traditional.
If there is at least one people who is nice or lucky, then Gilbert is environmental.
If someone is lucky, then he is traditional, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not stormy or elderly, then Quade is lucky.
It can be concluded that Quade is stormy once knowing that Coleman is nice and Rick is not lucky.
Someone is stormy and lucky if and only if he is environmental and not elderly.
If there is at least one people who is elderly, then Boris is traditional and Quade is not stormy.
Someone who is elderly is always not nice.
If someone is not environmental or he is traditional, then he is nice. | Gilbert is not elderly. | neutral |
Quade is lucky.
Rick is lucky.
Coleman is elderly.
Lucille is not traditional.
Coleman is traditional.
Gilbert is environmental.
Lucille is not elderly.
Boris is environmental.
Marvin is not nice.
Coleman is not nice.
Lucille is environmental.
Gilbert is not traditional.Someone being both not elderly and traditional is equivalent to being lucky.
If someone is not traditional and not lucky, then he is not stormy, and vice versa.
Lucille is not elderly and Rick is environmental if and only if Marvin is stormy and Gilbert is not traditional.
All not lucky people are not traditional.
If there is at least one people who is nice or lucky, then Gilbert is environmental.
If someone is lucky, then he is traditional, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not stormy or elderly, then Quade is lucky.
It can be concluded that Quade is stormy once knowing that Coleman is nice and Rick is not lucky.
Someone is stormy and lucky if and only if he is environmental and not elderly.
If there is at least one people who is elderly, then Boris is traditional and Quade is not stormy.
Someone who is elderly is always not nice.
If someone is not environmental or he is traditional, then he is nice. | Boris is traditional. | entailment |
Quade is lucky.
Rick is lucky.
Coleman is elderly.
Lucille is not traditional.
Coleman is traditional.
Gilbert is environmental.
Lucille is not elderly.
Boris is environmental.
Marvin is not nice.
Coleman is not nice.
Lucille is environmental.
Gilbert is not traditional.Someone being both not elderly and traditional is equivalent to being lucky.
If someone is not traditional and not lucky, then he is not stormy, and vice versa.
Lucille is not elderly and Rick is environmental if and only if Marvin is stormy and Gilbert is not traditional.
All not lucky people are not traditional.
If there is at least one people who is nice or lucky, then Gilbert is environmental.
If someone is lucky, then he is traditional, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not stormy or elderly, then Quade is lucky.
It can be concluded that Quade is stormy once knowing that Coleman is nice and Rick is not lucky.
Someone is stormy and lucky if and only if he is environmental and not elderly.
If there is at least one people who is elderly, then Boris is traditional and Quade is not stormy.
Someone who is elderly is always not nice.
If someone is not environmental or he is traditional, then he is nice. | Gilbert is not stormy. | neutral |
Quade is lucky.
Rick is lucky.
Coleman is elderly.
Lucille is not traditional.
Coleman is traditional.
Gilbert is environmental.
Lucille is not elderly.
Boris is environmental.
Marvin is not nice.
Coleman is not nice.
Lucille is environmental.
Gilbert is not traditional.Someone being both not elderly and traditional is equivalent to being lucky.
If someone is not traditional and not lucky, then he is not stormy, and vice versa.
Lucille is not elderly and Rick is environmental if and only if Marvin is stormy and Gilbert is not traditional.
All not lucky people are not traditional.
If there is at least one people who is nice or lucky, then Gilbert is environmental.
If someone is lucky, then he is traditional, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not stormy or elderly, then Quade is lucky.
It can be concluded that Quade is stormy once knowing that Coleman is nice and Rick is not lucky.
Someone is stormy and lucky if and only if he is environmental and not elderly.
If there is at least one people who is elderly, then Boris is traditional and Quade is not stormy.
Someone who is elderly is always not nice.
If someone is not environmental or he is traditional, then he is nice. | Marvin is traditional. | neutral |
Quade is lucky.
Rick is lucky.
Coleman is elderly.
Lucille is not traditional.
Coleman is traditional.
Gilbert is environmental.
Lucille is not elderly.
Boris is environmental.
Marvin is not nice.
Coleman is not nice.
Lucille is environmental.
Gilbert is not traditional.Someone being both not elderly and traditional is equivalent to being lucky.
If someone is not traditional and not lucky, then he is not stormy, and vice versa.
Lucille is not elderly and Rick is environmental if and only if Marvin is stormy and Gilbert is not traditional.
All not lucky people are not traditional.
If there is at least one people who is nice or lucky, then Gilbert is environmental.
If someone is lucky, then he is traditional, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not stormy or elderly, then Quade is lucky.
It can be concluded that Quade is stormy once knowing that Coleman is nice and Rick is not lucky.
Someone is stormy and lucky if and only if he is environmental and not elderly.
If there is at least one people who is elderly, then Boris is traditional and Quade is not stormy.
Someone who is elderly is always not nice.
If someone is not environmental or he is traditional, then he is nice. | Coleman is elderly. | self_contradiction |
Quade is lucky.
Rick is lucky.
Coleman is elderly.
Lucille is not traditional.
Coleman is traditional.
Gilbert is environmental.
Lucille is not elderly.
Boris is environmental.
Marvin is not nice.
Coleman is not nice.
Lucille is environmental.
Gilbert is not traditional.Someone being both not elderly and traditional is equivalent to being lucky.
If someone is not traditional and not lucky, then he is not stormy, and vice versa.
Lucille is not elderly and Rick is environmental if and only if Marvin is stormy and Gilbert is not traditional.
All not lucky people are not traditional.
If there is at least one people who is nice or lucky, then Gilbert is environmental.
If someone is lucky, then he is traditional, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not stormy or elderly, then Quade is lucky.
It can be concluded that Quade is stormy once knowing that Coleman is nice and Rick is not lucky.
Someone is stormy and lucky if and only if he is environmental and not elderly.
If there is at least one people who is elderly, then Boris is traditional and Quade is not stormy.
Someone who is elderly is always not nice.
If someone is not environmental or he is traditional, then he is nice. | Marvin is elderly. | neutral |
Quade is lucky.
Rick is lucky.
Coleman is elderly.
Lucille is not traditional.
Coleman is traditional.
Gilbert is environmental.
Lucille is not elderly.
Boris is environmental.
Marvin is not nice.
Coleman is not nice.
Lucille is environmental.
Gilbert is not traditional.Someone being both not elderly and traditional is equivalent to being lucky.
If someone is not traditional and not lucky, then he is not stormy, and vice versa.
Lucille is not elderly and Rick is environmental if and only if Marvin is stormy and Gilbert is not traditional.
All not lucky people are not traditional.
If there is at least one people who is nice or lucky, then Gilbert is environmental.
If someone is lucky, then he is traditional, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not stormy or elderly, then Quade is lucky.
It can be concluded that Quade is stormy once knowing that Coleman is nice and Rick is not lucky.
Someone is stormy and lucky if and only if he is environmental and not elderly.
If there is at least one people who is elderly, then Boris is traditional and Quade is not stormy.
Someone who is elderly is always not nice.
If someone is not environmental or he is traditional, then he is nice. | Gilbert is environmental. | entailment |
Quade is lucky.
Rick is lucky.
Coleman is elderly.
Lucille is not traditional.
Coleman is traditional.
Gilbert is environmental.
Lucille is not elderly.
Boris is environmental.
Marvin is not nice.
Coleman is not nice.
Lucille is environmental.
Gilbert is not traditional.Someone being both not elderly and traditional is equivalent to being lucky.
If someone is not traditional and not lucky, then he is not stormy, and vice versa.
Lucille is not elderly and Rick is environmental if and only if Marvin is stormy and Gilbert is not traditional.
All not lucky people are not traditional.
If there is at least one people who is nice or lucky, then Gilbert is environmental.
If someone is lucky, then he is traditional, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not stormy or elderly, then Quade is lucky.
It can be concluded that Quade is stormy once knowing that Coleman is nice and Rick is not lucky.
Someone is stormy and lucky if and only if he is environmental and not elderly.
If there is at least one people who is elderly, then Boris is traditional and Quade is not stormy.
Someone who is elderly is always not nice.
If someone is not environmental or he is traditional, then he is nice. | Marvin is not nice. | entailment |
Quade is lucky.
Rick is lucky.
Coleman is elderly.
Lucille is not traditional.
Coleman is traditional.
Gilbert is environmental.
Lucille is not elderly.
Boris is environmental.
Marvin is not nice.
Coleman is not nice.
Lucille is environmental.
Gilbert is not traditional.Someone being both not elderly and traditional is equivalent to being lucky.
If someone is not traditional and not lucky, then he is not stormy, and vice versa.
Lucille is not elderly and Rick is environmental if and only if Marvin is stormy and Gilbert is not traditional.
All not lucky people are not traditional.
If there is at least one people who is nice or lucky, then Gilbert is environmental.
If someone is lucky, then he is traditional, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not stormy or elderly, then Quade is lucky.
It can be concluded that Quade is stormy once knowing that Coleman is nice and Rick is not lucky.
Someone is stormy and lucky if and only if he is environmental and not elderly.
If there is at least one people who is elderly, then Boris is traditional and Quade is not stormy.
Someone who is elderly is always not nice.
If someone is not environmental or he is traditional, then he is nice. | Rick is not traditional. | contradiction |
Quade is lucky.
Rick is lucky.
Coleman is elderly.
Lucille is not traditional.
Coleman is traditional.
Gilbert is environmental.
Lucille is not elderly.
Boris is environmental.
Marvin is not nice.
Coleman is not nice.
Lucille is environmental.
Gilbert is not traditional.Someone being both not elderly and traditional is equivalent to being lucky.
If someone is not traditional and not lucky, then he is not stormy, and vice versa.
Lucille is not elderly and Rick is environmental if and only if Marvin is stormy and Gilbert is not traditional.
All not lucky people are not traditional.
If there is at least one people who is nice or lucky, then Gilbert is environmental.
If someone is lucky, then he is traditional, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not stormy or elderly, then Quade is lucky.
It can be concluded that Quade is stormy once knowing that Coleman is nice and Rick is not lucky.
Someone is stormy and lucky if and only if he is environmental and not elderly.
If there is at least one people who is elderly, then Boris is traditional and Quade is not stormy.
Someone who is elderly is always not nice.
If someone is not environmental or he is traditional, then he is nice. | Quade is traditional. | self_contradiction |
Quade is lucky.
Rick is lucky.
Coleman is elderly.
Lucille is not traditional.
Coleman is traditional.
Gilbert is environmental.
Lucille is not elderly.
Boris is environmental.
Marvin is not nice.
Coleman is not nice.
Lucille is environmental.
Gilbert is not traditional.Someone being both not elderly and traditional is equivalent to being lucky.
If someone is not traditional and not lucky, then he is not stormy, and vice versa.
Lucille is not elderly and Rick is environmental if and only if Marvin is stormy and Gilbert is not traditional.
All not lucky people are not traditional.
If there is at least one people who is nice or lucky, then Gilbert is environmental.
If someone is lucky, then he is traditional, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not stormy or elderly, then Quade is lucky.
It can be concluded that Quade is stormy once knowing that Coleman is nice and Rick is not lucky.
Someone is stormy and lucky if and only if he is environmental and not elderly.
If there is at least one people who is elderly, then Boris is traditional and Quade is not stormy.
Someone who is elderly is always not nice.
If someone is not environmental or he is traditional, then he is nice. | Quade is not lucky. | self_contradiction |
Quade is lucky.
Rick is lucky.
Coleman is elderly.
Lucille is not traditional.
Coleman is traditional.
Gilbert is environmental.
Lucille is not elderly.
Boris is environmental.
Marvin is not nice.
Coleman is not nice.
Lucille is environmental.
Gilbert is not traditional.Someone being both not elderly and traditional is equivalent to being lucky.
If someone is not traditional and not lucky, then he is not stormy, and vice versa.
Lucille is not elderly and Rick is environmental if and only if Marvin is stormy and Gilbert is not traditional.
All not lucky people are not traditional.
If there is at least one people who is nice or lucky, then Gilbert is environmental.
If someone is lucky, then he is traditional, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not stormy or elderly, then Quade is lucky.
It can be concluded that Quade is stormy once knowing that Coleman is nice and Rick is not lucky.
Someone is stormy and lucky if and only if he is environmental and not elderly.
If there is at least one people who is elderly, then Boris is traditional and Quade is not stormy.
Someone who is elderly is always not nice.
If someone is not environmental or he is traditional, then he is nice. | Rick is not elderly. | entailment |
Quade is lucky.
Rick is lucky.
Coleman is elderly.
Lucille is not traditional.
Coleman is traditional.
Gilbert is environmental.
Lucille is not elderly.
Boris is environmental.
Marvin is not nice.
Coleman is not nice.
Lucille is environmental.
Gilbert is not traditional.Someone being both not elderly and traditional is equivalent to being lucky.
If someone is not traditional and not lucky, then he is not stormy, and vice versa.
Lucille is not elderly and Rick is environmental if and only if Marvin is stormy and Gilbert is not traditional.
All not lucky people are not traditional.
If there is at least one people who is nice or lucky, then Gilbert is environmental.
If someone is lucky, then he is traditional, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not stormy or elderly, then Quade is lucky.
It can be concluded that Quade is stormy once knowing that Coleman is nice and Rick is not lucky.
Someone is stormy and lucky if and only if he is environmental and not elderly.
If there is at least one people who is elderly, then Boris is traditional and Quade is not stormy.
Someone who is elderly is always not nice.
If someone is not environmental or he is traditional, then he is nice. | Rick is elderly. | contradiction |
Quade is lucky.
Rick is lucky.
Coleman is elderly.
Lucille is not traditional.
Coleman is traditional.
Gilbert is environmental.
Lucille is not elderly.
Boris is environmental.
Marvin is not nice.
Coleman is not nice.
Lucille is environmental.
Gilbert is not traditional.Someone being both not elderly and traditional is equivalent to being lucky.
If someone is not traditional and not lucky, then he is not stormy, and vice versa.
Lucille is not elderly and Rick is environmental if and only if Marvin is stormy and Gilbert is not traditional.
All not lucky people are not traditional.
If there is at least one people who is nice or lucky, then Gilbert is environmental.
If someone is lucky, then he is traditional, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not stormy or elderly, then Quade is lucky.
It can be concluded that Quade is stormy once knowing that Coleman is nice and Rick is not lucky.
Someone is stormy and lucky if and only if he is environmental and not elderly.
If there is at least one people who is elderly, then Boris is traditional and Quade is not stormy.
Someone who is elderly is always not nice.
If someone is not environmental or he is traditional, then he is nice. | Coleman is not elderly. | self_contradiction |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.