premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Shawn is not good-tempered.
Samson is not frightened.
Danna is not humble.
Alfred is cute.
Cadman is frightened.
Baldwin is good-tempered.
Baldwin is cute.
Kathie is humble.
Cadman is good-tempered.
Danna is not sufficient.
Alfred is humble.
Shawn is not humble.If Baldwin is not cute, then Alfred is not careful, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not humble and careful is always cute.
Someone being both not cute and not frightened is equivalent to being sufficient.
Cadman being humble and Samson being not frightened imply that Danna is not careful and Alfred is not cute.
If there is at least one people who is frightened, then Kathie is not careful.
If someone is not frightened or not humble, then he is not careful.
if there is at least one people who is not sufficient and not humble, then Samson is good-tempered and Samson is not frightened.
If someone is both cute and not careful, then he is not frightened.
It can be concluded that Alfred is frightened and Baldwin is not good-tempered once knowing that Kathie is not cute.
As long as someone is cute, he is frightened and not good-tempered.
If there is at least one people who is sufficient, then Alfred is careful and Samson is not cute.
Someone who is frightened is always both not good-tempered and sufficient. | Baldwin is not frightened. | self_contradiction |
Shawn is not good-tempered.
Samson is not frightened.
Danna is not humble.
Alfred is cute.
Cadman is frightened.
Baldwin is good-tempered.
Baldwin is cute.
Kathie is humble.
Cadman is good-tempered.
Danna is not sufficient.
Alfred is humble.
Shawn is not humble.If Baldwin is not cute, then Alfred is not careful, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not humble and careful is always cute.
Someone being both not cute and not frightened is equivalent to being sufficient.
Cadman being humble and Samson being not frightened imply that Danna is not careful and Alfred is not cute.
If there is at least one people who is frightened, then Kathie is not careful.
If someone is not frightened or not humble, then he is not careful.
if there is at least one people who is not sufficient and not humble, then Samson is good-tempered and Samson is not frightened.
If someone is both cute and not careful, then he is not frightened.
It can be concluded that Alfred is frightened and Baldwin is not good-tempered once knowing that Kathie is not cute.
As long as someone is cute, he is frightened and not good-tempered.
If there is at least one people who is sufficient, then Alfred is careful and Samson is not cute.
Someone who is frightened is always both not good-tempered and sufficient. | Cadman is not good-tempered. | self_contradiction |
Shawn is not good-tempered.
Samson is not frightened.
Danna is not humble.
Alfred is cute.
Cadman is frightened.
Baldwin is good-tempered.
Baldwin is cute.
Kathie is humble.
Cadman is good-tempered.
Danna is not sufficient.
Alfred is humble.
Shawn is not humble.If Baldwin is not cute, then Alfred is not careful, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not humble and careful is always cute.
Someone being both not cute and not frightened is equivalent to being sufficient.
Cadman being humble and Samson being not frightened imply that Danna is not careful and Alfred is not cute.
If there is at least one people who is frightened, then Kathie is not careful.
If someone is not frightened or not humble, then he is not careful.
if there is at least one people who is not sufficient and not humble, then Samson is good-tempered and Samson is not frightened.
If someone is both cute and not careful, then he is not frightened.
It can be concluded that Alfred is frightened and Baldwin is not good-tempered once knowing that Kathie is not cute.
As long as someone is cute, he is frightened and not good-tempered.
If there is at least one people who is sufficient, then Alfred is careful and Samson is not cute.
Someone who is frightened is always both not good-tempered and sufficient. | Baldwin is not cute. | self_contradiction |
Shawn is not good-tempered.
Samson is not frightened.
Danna is not humble.
Alfred is cute.
Cadman is frightened.
Baldwin is good-tempered.
Baldwin is cute.
Kathie is humble.
Cadman is good-tempered.
Danna is not sufficient.
Alfred is humble.
Shawn is not humble.If Baldwin is not cute, then Alfred is not careful, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not humble and careful is always cute.
Someone being both not cute and not frightened is equivalent to being sufficient.
Cadman being humble and Samson being not frightened imply that Danna is not careful and Alfred is not cute.
If there is at least one people who is frightened, then Kathie is not careful.
If someone is not frightened or not humble, then he is not careful.
if there is at least one people who is not sufficient and not humble, then Samson is good-tempered and Samson is not frightened.
If someone is both cute and not careful, then he is not frightened.
It can be concluded that Alfred is frightened and Baldwin is not good-tempered once knowing that Kathie is not cute.
As long as someone is cute, he is frightened and not good-tempered.
If there is at least one people who is sufficient, then Alfred is careful and Samson is not cute.
Someone who is frightened is always both not good-tempered and sufficient. | Baldwin is not sufficient. | contradiction |
Shawn is not good-tempered.
Samson is not frightened.
Danna is not humble.
Alfred is cute.
Cadman is frightened.
Baldwin is good-tempered.
Baldwin is cute.
Kathie is humble.
Cadman is good-tempered.
Danna is not sufficient.
Alfred is humble.
Shawn is not humble.If Baldwin is not cute, then Alfred is not careful, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not humble and careful is always cute.
Someone being both not cute and not frightened is equivalent to being sufficient.
Cadman being humble and Samson being not frightened imply that Danna is not careful and Alfred is not cute.
If there is at least one people who is frightened, then Kathie is not careful.
If someone is not frightened or not humble, then he is not careful.
if there is at least one people who is not sufficient and not humble, then Samson is good-tempered and Samson is not frightened.
If someone is both cute and not careful, then he is not frightened.
It can be concluded that Alfred is frightened and Baldwin is not good-tempered once knowing that Kathie is not cute.
As long as someone is cute, he is frightened and not good-tempered.
If there is at least one people who is sufficient, then Alfred is careful and Samson is not cute.
Someone who is frightened is always both not good-tempered and sufficient. | Shawn is not cute. | neutral |
Shawn is not good-tempered.
Samson is not frightened.
Danna is not humble.
Alfred is cute.
Cadman is frightened.
Baldwin is good-tempered.
Baldwin is cute.
Kathie is humble.
Cadman is good-tempered.
Danna is not sufficient.
Alfred is humble.
Shawn is not humble.If Baldwin is not cute, then Alfred is not careful, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not humble and careful is always cute.
Someone being both not cute and not frightened is equivalent to being sufficient.
Cadman being humble and Samson being not frightened imply that Danna is not careful and Alfred is not cute.
If there is at least one people who is frightened, then Kathie is not careful.
If someone is not frightened or not humble, then he is not careful.
if there is at least one people who is not sufficient and not humble, then Samson is good-tempered and Samson is not frightened.
If someone is both cute and not careful, then he is not frightened.
It can be concluded that Alfred is frightened and Baldwin is not good-tempered once knowing that Kathie is not cute.
As long as someone is cute, he is frightened and not good-tempered.
If there is at least one people who is sufficient, then Alfred is careful and Samson is not cute.
Someone who is frightened is always both not good-tempered and sufficient. | Cadman is careful. | contradiction |
Shawn is not good-tempered.
Samson is not frightened.
Danna is not humble.
Alfred is cute.
Cadman is frightened.
Baldwin is good-tempered.
Baldwin is cute.
Kathie is humble.
Cadman is good-tempered.
Danna is not sufficient.
Alfred is humble.
Shawn is not humble.If Baldwin is not cute, then Alfred is not careful, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not humble and careful is always cute.
Someone being both not cute and not frightened is equivalent to being sufficient.
Cadman being humble and Samson being not frightened imply that Danna is not careful and Alfred is not cute.
If there is at least one people who is frightened, then Kathie is not careful.
If someone is not frightened or not humble, then he is not careful.
if there is at least one people who is not sufficient and not humble, then Samson is good-tempered and Samson is not frightened.
If someone is both cute and not careful, then he is not frightened.
It can be concluded that Alfred is frightened and Baldwin is not good-tempered once knowing that Kathie is not cute.
As long as someone is cute, he is frightened and not good-tempered.
If there is at least one people who is sufficient, then Alfred is careful and Samson is not cute.
Someone who is frightened is always both not good-tempered and sufficient. | Cadman is cute. | contradiction |
Shawn is not good-tempered.
Samson is not frightened.
Danna is not humble.
Alfred is cute.
Cadman is frightened.
Baldwin is good-tempered.
Baldwin is cute.
Kathie is humble.
Cadman is good-tempered.
Danna is not sufficient.
Alfred is humble.
Shawn is not humble.If Baldwin is not cute, then Alfred is not careful, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not humble and careful is always cute.
Someone being both not cute and not frightened is equivalent to being sufficient.
Cadman being humble and Samson being not frightened imply that Danna is not careful and Alfred is not cute.
If there is at least one people who is frightened, then Kathie is not careful.
If someone is not frightened or not humble, then he is not careful.
if there is at least one people who is not sufficient and not humble, then Samson is good-tempered and Samson is not frightened.
If someone is both cute and not careful, then he is not frightened.
It can be concluded that Alfred is frightened and Baldwin is not good-tempered once knowing that Kathie is not cute.
As long as someone is cute, he is frightened and not good-tempered.
If there is at least one people who is sufficient, then Alfred is careful and Samson is not cute.
Someone who is frightened is always both not good-tempered and sufficient. | Danna is not careful. | entailment |
Shawn is not good-tempered.
Samson is not frightened.
Danna is not humble.
Alfred is cute.
Cadman is frightened.
Baldwin is good-tempered.
Baldwin is cute.
Kathie is humble.
Cadman is good-tempered.
Danna is not sufficient.
Alfred is humble.
Shawn is not humble.If Baldwin is not cute, then Alfred is not careful, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not humble and careful is always cute.
Someone being both not cute and not frightened is equivalent to being sufficient.
Cadman being humble and Samson being not frightened imply that Danna is not careful and Alfred is not cute.
If there is at least one people who is frightened, then Kathie is not careful.
If someone is not frightened or not humble, then he is not careful.
if there is at least one people who is not sufficient and not humble, then Samson is good-tempered and Samson is not frightened.
If someone is both cute and not careful, then he is not frightened.
It can be concluded that Alfred is frightened and Baldwin is not good-tempered once knowing that Kathie is not cute.
As long as someone is cute, he is frightened and not good-tempered.
If there is at least one people who is sufficient, then Alfred is careful and Samson is not cute.
Someone who is frightened is always both not good-tempered and sufficient. | Baldwin is humble. | neutral |
Shawn is not good-tempered.
Samson is not frightened.
Danna is not humble.
Alfred is cute.
Cadman is frightened.
Baldwin is good-tempered.
Baldwin is cute.
Kathie is humble.
Cadman is good-tempered.
Danna is not sufficient.
Alfred is humble.
Shawn is not humble.If Baldwin is not cute, then Alfred is not careful, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not humble and careful is always cute.
Someone being both not cute and not frightened is equivalent to being sufficient.
Cadman being humble and Samson being not frightened imply that Danna is not careful and Alfred is not cute.
If there is at least one people who is frightened, then Kathie is not careful.
If someone is not frightened or not humble, then he is not careful.
if there is at least one people who is not sufficient and not humble, then Samson is good-tempered and Samson is not frightened.
If someone is both cute and not careful, then he is not frightened.
It can be concluded that Alfred is frightened and Baldwin is not good-tempered once knowing that Kathie is not cute.
As long as someone is cute, he is frightened and not good-tempered.
If there is at least one people who is sufficient, then Alfred is careful and Samson is not cute.
Someone who is frightened is always both not good-tempered and sufficient. | Baldwin is not humble. | neutral |
Shawn is not good-tempered.
Samson is not frightened.
Danna is not humble.
Alfred is cute.
Cadman is frightened.
Baldwin is good-tempered.
Baldwin is cute.
Kathie is humble.
Cadman is good-tempered.
Danna is not sufficient.
Alfred is humble.
Shawn is not humble.If Baldwin is not cute, then Alfred is not careful, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not humble and careful is always cute.
Someone being both not cute and not frightened is equivalent to being sufficient.
Cadman being humble and Samson being not frightened imply that Danna is not careful and Alfred is not cute.
If there is at least one people who is frightened, then Kathie is not careful.
If someone is not frightened or not humble, then he is not careful.
if there is at least one people who is not sufficient and not humble, then Samson is good-tempered and Samson is not frightened.
If someone is both cute and not careful, then he is not frightened.
It can be concluded that Alfred is frightened and Baldwin is not good-tempered once knowing that Kathie is not cute.
As long as someone is cute, he is frightened and not good-tempered.
If there is at least one people who is sufficient, then Alfred is careful and Samson is not cute.
Someone who is frightened is always both not good-tempered and sufficient. | Alfred is good-tempered. | contradiction |
Shawn is not good-tempered.
Samson is not frightened.
Danna is not humble.
Alfred is cute.
Cadman is frightened.
Baldwin is good-tempered.
Baldwin is cute.
Kathie is humble.
Cadman is good-tempered.
Danna is not sufficient.
Alfred is humble.
Shawn is not humble.If Baldwin is not cute, then Alfred is not careful, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not humble and careful is always cute.
Someone being both not cute and not frightened is equivalent to being sufficient.
Cadman being humble and Samson being not frightened imply that Danna is not careful and Alfred is not cute.
If there is at least one people who is frightened, then Kathie is not careful.
If someone is not frightened or not humble, then he is not careful.
if there is at least one people who is not sufficient and not humble, then Samson is good-tempered and Samson is not frightened.
If someone is both cute and not careful, then he is not frightened.
It can be concluded that Alfred is frightened and Baldwin is not good-tempered once knowing that Kathie is not cute.
As long as someone is cute, he is frightened and not good-tempered.
If there is at least one people who is sufficient, then Alfred is careful and Samson is not cute.
Someone who is frightened is always both not good-tempered and sufficient. | Danna is not frightened. | neutral |
Shawn is not good-tempered.
Samson is not frightened.
Danna is not humble.
Alfred is cute.
Cadman is frightened.
Baldwin is good-tempered.
Baldwin is cute.
Kathie is humble.
Cadman is good-tempered.
Danna is not sufficient.
Alfred is humble.
Shawn is not humble.If Baldwin is not cute, then Alfred is not careful, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not humble and careful is always cute.
Someone being both not cute and not frightened is equivalent to being sufficient.
Cadman being humble and Samson being not frightened imply that Danna is not careful and Alfred is not cute.
If there is at least one people who is frightened, then Kathie is not careful.
If someone is not frightened or not humble, then he is not careful.
if there is at least one people who is not sufficient and not humble, then Samson is good-tempered and Samson is not frightened.
If someone is both cute and not careful, then he is not frightened.
It can be concluded that Alfred is frightened and Baldwin is not good-tempered once knowing that Kathie is not cute.
As long as someone is cute, he is frightened and not good-tempered.
If there is at least one people who is sufficient, then Alfred is careful and Samson is not cute.
Someone who is frightened is always both not good-tempered and sufficient. | Alfred is not frightened. | self_contradiction |
Shawn is not good-tempered.
Samson is not frightened.
Danna is not humble.
Alfred is cute.
Cadman is frightened.
Baldwin is good-tempered.
Baldwin is cute.
Kathie is humble.
Cadman is good-tempered.
Danna is not sufficient.
Alfred is humble.
Shawn is not humble.If Baldwin is not cute, then Alfred is not careful, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not humble and careful is always cute.
Someone being both not cute and not frightened is equivalent to being sufficient.
Cadman being humble and Samson being not frightened imply that Danna is not careful and Alfred is not cute.
If there is at least one people who is frightened, then Kathie is not careful.
If someone is not frightened or not humble, then he is not careful.
if there is at least one people who is not sufficient and not humble, then Samson is good-tempered and Samson is not frightened.
If someone is both cute and not careful, then he is not frightened.
It can be concluded that Alfred is frightened and Baldwin is not good-tempered once knowing that Kathie is not cute.
As long as someone is cute, he is frightened and not good-tempered.
If there is at least one people who is sufficient, then Alfred is careful and Samson is not cute.
Someone who is frightened is always both not good-tempered and sufficient. | Baldwin is sufficient. | entailment |
Shawn is not good-tempered.
Samson is not frightened.
Danna is not humble.
Alfred is cute.
Cadman is frightened.
Baldwin is good-tempered.
Baldwin is cute.
Kathie is humble.
Cadman is good-tempered.
Danna is not sufficient.
Alfred is humble.
Shawn is not humble.If Baldwin is not cute, then Alfred is not careful, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not humble and careful is always cute.
Someone being both not cute and not frightened is equivalent to being sufficient.
Cadman being humble and Samson being not frightened imply that Danna is not careful and Alfred is not cute.
If there is at least one people who is frightened, then Kathie is not careful.
If someone is not frightened or not humble, then he is not careful.
if there is at least one people who is not sufficient and not humble, then Samson is good-tempered and Samson is not frightened.
If someone is both cute and not careful, then he is not frightened.
It can be concluded that Alfred is frightened and Baldwin is not good-tempered once knowing that Kathie is not cute.
As long as someone is cute, he is frightened and not good-tempered.
If there is at least one people who is sufficient, then Alfred is careful and Samson is not cute.
Someone who is frightened is always both not good-tempered and sufficient. | Alfred is careful. | self_contradiction |
Shawn is not good-tempered.
Samson is not frightened.
Danna is not humble.
Alfred is cute.
Cadman is frightened.
Baldwin is good-tempered.
Baldwin is cute.
Kathie is humble.
Cadman is good-tempered.
Danna is not sufficient.
Alfred is humble.
Shawn is not humble.If Baldwin is not cute, then Alfred is not careful, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not humble and careful is always cute.
Someone being both not cute and not frightened is equivalent to being sufficient.
Cadman being humble and Samson being not frightened imply that Danna is not careful and Alfred is not cute.
If there is at least one people who is frightened, then Kathie is not careful.
If someone is not frightened or not humble, then he is not careful.
if there is at least one people who is not sufficient and not humble, then Samson is good-tempered and Samson is not frightened.
If someone is both cute and not careful, then he is not frightened.
It can be concluded that Alfred is frightened and Baldwin is not good-tempered once knowing that Kathie is not cute.
As long as someone is cute, he is frightened and not good-tempered.
If there is at least one people who is sufficient, then Alfred is careful and Samson is not cute.
Someone who is frightened is always both not good-tempered and sufficient. | Samson is not frightened. | entailment |
Shawn is not good-tempered.
Samson is not frightened.
Danna is not humble.
Alfred is cute.
Cadman is frightened.
Baldwin is good-tempered.
Baldwin is cute.
Kathie is humble.
Cadman is good-tempered.
Danna is not sufficient.
Alfred is humble.
Shawn is not humble.If Baldwin is not cute, then Alfred is not careful, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not humble and careful is always cute.
Someone being both not cute and not frightened is equivalent to being sufficient.
Cadman being humble and Samson being not frightened imply that Danna is not careful and Alfred is not cute.
If there is at least one people who is frightened, then Kathie is not careful.
If someone is not frightened or not humble, then he is not careful.
if there is at least one people who is not sufficient and not humble, then Samson is good-tempered and Samson is not frightened.
If someone is both cute and not careful, then he is not frightened.
It can be concluded that Alfred is frightened and Baldwin is not good-tempered once knowing that Kathie is not cute.
As long as someone is cute, he is frightened and not good-tempered.
If there is at least one people who is sufficient, then Alfred is careful and Samson is not cute.
Someone who is frightened is always both not good-tempered and sufficient. | Cadman is sufficient. | entailment |
Shawn is not good-tempered.
Samson is not frightened.
Danna is not humble.
Alfred is cute.
Cadman is frightened.
Baldwin is good-tempered.
Baldwin is cute.
Kathie is humble.
Cadman is good-tempered.
Danna is not sufficient.
Alfred is humble.
Shawn is not humble.If Baldwin is not cute, then Alfred is not careful, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not humble and careful is always cute.
Someone being both not cute and not frightened is equivalent to being sufficient.
Cadman being humble and Samson being not frightened imply that Danna is not careful and Alfred is not cute.
If there is at least one people who is frightened, then Kathie is not careful.
If someone is not frightened or not humble, then he is not careful.
if there is at least one people who is not sufficient and not humble, then Samson is good-tempered and Samson is not frightened.
If someone is both cute and not careful, then he is not frightened.
It can be concluded that Alfred is frightened and Baldwin is not good-tempered once knowing that Kathie is not cute.
As long as someone is cute, he is frightened and not good-tempered.
If there is at least one people who is sufficient, then Alfred is careful and Samson is not cute.
Someone who is frightened is always both not good-tempered and sufficient. | Alfred is humble. | entailment |
Shawn is not good-tempered.
Samson is not frightened.
Danna is not humble.
Alfred is cute.
Cadman is frightened.
Baldwin is good-tempered.
Baldwin is cute.
Kathie is humble.
Cadman is good-tempered.
Danna is not sufficient.
Alfred is humble.
Shawn is not humble.If Baldwin is not cute, then Alfred is not careful, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not humble and careful is always cute.
Someone being both not cute and not frightened is equivalent to being sufficient.
Cadman being humble and Samson being not frightened imply that Danna is not careful and Alfred is not cute.
If there is at least one people who is frightened, then Kathie is not careful.
If someone is not frightened or not humble, then he is not careful.
if there is at least one people who is not sufficient and not humble, then Samson is good-tempered and Samson is not frightened.
If someone is both cute and not careful, then he is not frightened.
It can be concluded that Alfred is frightened and Baldwin is not good-tempered once knowing that Kathie is not cute.
As long as someone is cute, he is frightened and not good-tempered.
If there is at least one people who is sufficient, then Alfred is careful and Samson is not cute.
Someone who is frightened is always both not good-tempered and sufficient. | Danna is careful. | contradiction |
Shawn is not good-tempered.
Samson is not frightened.
Danna is not humble.
Alfred is cute.
Cadman is frightened.
Baldwin is good-tempered.
Baldwin is cute.
Kathie is humble.
Cadman is good-tempered.
Danna is not sufficient.
Alfred is humble.
Shawn is not humble.If Baldwin is not cute, then Alfred is not careful, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not humble and careful is always cute.
Someone being both not cute and not frightened is equivalent to being sufficient.
Cadman being humble and Samson being not frightened imply that Danna is not careful and Alfred is not cute.
If there is at least one people who is frightened, then Kathie is not careful.
If someone is not frightened or not humble, then he is not careful.
if there is at least one people who is not sufficient and not humble, then Samson is good-tempered and Samson is not frightened.
If someone is both cute and not careful, then he is not frightened.
It can be concluded that Alfred is frightened and Baldwin is not good-tempered once knowing that Kathie is not cute.
As long as someone is cute, he is frightened and not good-tempered.
If there is at least one people who is sufficient, then Alfred is careful and Samson is not cute.
Someone who is frightened is always both not good-tempered and sufficient. | Cadman is humble. | neutral |
Clark is not environmental.
Rosie is uninterested.
Jesse is not condemned.
Rosie is sweet.
Rosie is not condemned.
Gideon is environmental.
Gideon is not untidy.
James is not beautiful.
Arlen is not condemned.
Lester is not environmental.
Jesse is not beautiful.
Jesse is sweet.If Lester is not uninterested, then Arlen is not untidy, and vice versa.
If someone is untidy and beautiful, then he is uninterested, and vice versa.
Someone who is not sweet is always not condemned.
It can be concluded that Arlen is not environmental once knowing that Lester is not beautiful.
If there is at least one people who is both not beautiful and environmental, then Lester is not untidy.
Rosie being not condemned is equivalent to Lester being not uninterested and Arlen being sweet.
Someone is not sweet if and only if he is not beautiful.
If Rosie is not sweet, then Clark is environmental.
If there is someone who is sweet, then Gideon is uninterested.
If everyone is not condemned, then James is beautiful and Arlen is not uninterested.
If someone is not condemned and untidy, then he is sweet, and vice versa.
If someone is not uninterested, then he is not condemned, and vice versa. | Jesse is beautiful. | contradiction |
Clark is not environmental.
Rosie is uninterested.
Jesse is not condemned.
Rosie is sweet.
Rosie is not condemned.
Gideon is environmental.
Gideon is not untidy.
James is not beautiful.
Arlen is not condemned.
Lester is not environmental.
Jesse is not beautiful.
Jesse is sweet.If Lester is not uninterested, then Arlen is not untidy, and vice versa.
If someone is untidy and beautiful, then he is uninterested, and vice versa.
Someone who is not sweet is always not condemned.
It can be concluded that Arlen is not environmental once knowing that Lester is not beautiful.
If there is at least one people who is both not beautiful and environmental, then Lester is not untidy.
Rosie being not condemned is equivalent to Lester being not uninterested and Arlen being sweet.
Someone is not sweet if and only if he is not beautiful.
If Rosie is not sweet, then Clark is environmental.
If there is someone who is sweet, then Gideon is uninterested.
If everyone is not condemned, then James is beautiful and Arlen is not uninterested.
If someone is not condemned and untidy, then he is sweet, and vice versa.
If someone is not uninterested, then he is not condemned, and vice versa. | Rosie is not condemned. | entailment |
Clark is not environmental.
Rosie is uninterested.
Jesse is not condemned.
Rosie is sweet.
Rosie is not condemned.
Gideon is environmental.
Gideon is not untidy.
James is not beautiful.
Arlen is not condemned.
Lester is not environmental.
Jesse is not beautiful.
Jesse is sweet.If Lester is not uninterested, then Arlen is not untidy, and vice versa.
If someone is untidy and beautiful, then he is uninterested, and vice versa.
Someone who is not sweet is always not condemned.
It can be concluded that Arlen is not environmental once knowing that Lester is not beautiful.
If there is at least one people who is both not beautiful and environmental, then Lester is not untidy.
Rosie being not condemned is equivalent to Lester being not uninterested and Arlen being sweet.
Someone is not sweet if and only if he is not beautiful.
If Rosie is not sweet, then Clark is environmental.
If there is someone who is sweet, then Gideon is uninterested.
If everyone is not condemned, then James is beautiful and Arlen is not uninterested.
If someone is not condemned and untidy, then he is sweet, and vice versa.
If someone is not uninterested, then he is not condemned, and vice versa. | Arlen is untidy. | self_contradiction |
Clark is not environmental.
Rosie is uninterested.
Jesse is not condemned.
Rosie is sweet.
Rosie is not condemned.
Gideon is environmental.
Gideon is not untidy.
James is not beautiful.
Arlen is not condemned.
Lester is not environmental.
Jesse is not beautiful.
Jesse is sweet.If Lester is not uninterested, then Arlen is not untidy, and vice versa.
If someone is untidy and beautiful, then he is uninterested, and vice versa.
Someone who is not sweet is always not condemned.
It can be concluded that Arlen is not environmental once knowing that Lester is not beautiful.
If there is at least one people who is both not beautiful and environmental, then Lester is not untidy.
Rosie being not condemned is equivalent to Lester being not uninterested and Arlen being sweet.
Someone is not sweet if and only if he is not beautiful.
If Rosie is not sweet, then Clark is environmental.
If there is someone who is sweet, then Gideon is uninterested.
If everyone is not condemned, then James is beautiful and Arlen is not uninterested.
If someone is not condemned and untidy, then he is sweet, and vice versa.
If someone is not uninterested, then he is not condemned, and vice versa. | Clark is sweet. | neutral |
Clark is not environmental.
Rosie is uninterested.
Jesse is not condemned.
Rosie is sweet.
Rosie is not condemned.
Gideon is environmental.
Gideon is not untidy.
James is not beautiful.
Arlen is not condemned.
Lester is not environmental.
Jesse is not beautiful.
Jesse is sweet.If Lester is not uninterested, then Arlen is not untidy, and vice versa.
If someone is untidy and beautiful, then he is uninterested, and vice versa.
Someone who is not sweet is always not condemned.
It can be concluded that Arlen is not environmental once knowing that Lester is not beautiful.
If there is at least one people who is both not beautiful and environmental, then Lester is not untidy.
Rosie being not condemned is equivalent to Lester being not uninterested and Arlen being sweet.
Someone is not sweet if and only if he is not beautiful.
If Rosie is not sweet, then Clark is environmental.
If there is someone who is sweet, then Gideon is uninterested.
If everyone is not condemned, then James is beautiful and Arlen is not uninterested.
If someone is not condemned and untidy, then he is sweet, and vice versa.
If someone is not uninterested, then he is not condemned, and vice versa. | Gideon is sweet. | neutral |
Clark is not environmental.
Rosie is uninterested.
Jesse is not condemned.
Rosie is sweet.
Rosie is not condemned.
Gideon is environmental.
Gideon is not untidy.
James is not beautiful.
Arlen is not condemned.
Lester is not environmental.
Jesse is not beautiful.
Jesse is sweet.If Lester is not uninterested, then Arlen is not untidy, and vice versa.
If someone is untidy and beautiful, then he is uninterested, and vice versa.
Someone who is not sweet is always not condemned.
It can be concluded that Arlen is not environmental once knowing that Lester is not beautiful.
If there is at least one people who is both not beautiful and environmental, then Lester is not untidy.
Rosie being not condemned is equivalent to Lester being not uninterested and Arlen being sweet.
Someone is not sweet if and only if he is not beautiful.
If Rosie is not sweet, then Clark is environmental.
If there is someone who is sweet, then Gideon is uninterested.
If everyone is not condemned, then James is beautiful and Arlen is not uninterested.
If someone is not condemned and untidy, then he is sweet, and vice versa.
If someone is not uninterested, then he is not condemned, and vice versa. | Gideon is untidy. | self_contradiction |
Clark is not environmental.
Rosie is uninterested.
Jesse is not condemned.
Rosie is sweet.
Rosie is not condemned.
Gideon is environmental.
Gideon is not untidy.
James is not beautiful.
Arlen is not condemned.
Lester is not environmental.
Jesse is not beautiful.
Jesse is sweet.If Lester is not uninterested, then Arlen is not untidy, and vice versa.
If someone is untidy and beautiful, then he is uninterested, and vice versa.
Someone who is not sweet is always not condemned.
It can be concluded that Arlen is not environmental once knowing that Lester is not beautiful.
If there is at least one people who is both not beautiful and environmental, then Lester is not untidy.
Rosie being not condemned is equivalent to Lester being not uninterested and Arlen being sweet.
Someone is not sweet if and only if he is not beautiful.
If Rosie is not sweet, then Clark is environmental.
If there is someone who is sweet, then Gideon is uninterested.
If everyone is not condemned, then James is beautiful and Arlen is not uninterested.
If someone is not condemned and untidy, then he is sweet, and vice versa.
If someone is not uninterested, then he is not condemned, and vice versa. | Jesse is not sweet. | self_contradiction |
Clark is not environmental.
Rosie is uninterested.
Jesse is not condemned.
Rosie is sweet.
Rosie is not condemned.
Gideon is environmental.
Gideon is not untidy.
James is not beautiful.
Arlen is not condemned.
Lester is not environmental.
Jesse is not beautiful.
Jesse is sweet.If Lester is not uninterested, then Arlen is not untidy, and vice versa.
If someone is untidy and beautiful, then he is uninterested, and vice versa.
Someone who is not sweet is always not condemned.
It can be concluded that Arlen is not environmental once knowing that Lester is not beautiful.
If there is at least one people who is both not beautiful and environmental, then Lester is not untidy.
Rosie being not condemned is equivalent to Lester being not uninterested and Arlen being sweet.
Someone is not sweet if and only if he is not beautiful.
If Rosie is not sweet, then Clark is environmental.
If there is someone who is sweet, then Gideon is uninterested.
If everyone is not condemned, then James is beautiful and Arlen is not uninterested.
If someone is not condemned and untidy, then he is sweet, and vice versa.
If someone is not uninterested, then he is not condemned, and vice versa. | Rosie is untidy. | entailment |
Clark is not environmental.
Rosie is uninterested.
Jesse is not condemned.
Rosie is sweet.
Rosie is not condemned.
Gideon is environmental.
Gideon is not untidy.
James is not beautiful.
Arlen is not condemned.
Lester is not environmental.
Jesse is not beautiful.
Jesse is sweet.If Lester is not uninterested, then Arlen is not untidy, and vice versa.
If someone is untidy and beautiful, then he is uninterested, and vice versa.
Someone who is not sweet is always not condemned.
It can be concluded that Arlen is not environmental once knowing that Lester is not beautiful.
If there is at least one people who is both not beautiful and environmental, then Lester is not untidy.
Rosie being not condemned is equivalent to Lester being not uninterested and Arlen being sweet.
Someone is not sweet if and only if he is not beautiful.
If Rosie is not sweet, then Clark is environmental.
If there is someone who is sweet, then Gideon is uninterested.
If everyone is not condemned, then James is beautiful and Arlen is not uninterested.
If someone is not condemned and untidy, then he is sweet, and vice versa.
If someone is not uninterested, then he is not condemned, and vice versa. | Lester is not condemned. | entailment |
Clark is not environmental.
Rosie is uninterested.
Jesse is not condemned.
Rosie is sweet.
Rosie is not condemned.
Gideon is environmental.
Gideon is not untidy.
James is not beautiful.
Arlen is not condemned.
Lester is not environmental.
Jesse is not beautiful.
Jesse is sweet.If Lester is not uninterested, then Arlen is not untidy, and vice versa.
If someone is untidy and beautiful, then he is uninterested, and vice versa.
Someone who is not sweet is always not condemned.
It can be concluded that Arlen is not environmental once knowing that Lester is not beautiful.
If there is at least one people who is both not beautiful and environmental, then Lester is not untidy.
Rosie being not condemned is equivalent to Lester being not uninterested and Arlen being sweet.
Someone is not sweet if and only if he is not beautiful.
If Rosie is not sweet, then Clark is environmental.
If there is someone who is sweet, then Gideon is uninterested.
If everyone is not condemned, then James is beautiful and Arlen is not uninterested.
If someone is not condemned and untidy, then he is sweet, and vice versa.
If someone is not uninterested, then he is not condemned, and vice versa. | Jesse is condemned. | contradiction |
Clark is not environmental.
Rosie is uninterested.
Jesse is not condemned.
Rosie is sweet.
Rosie is not condemned.
Gideon is environmental.
Gideon is not untidy.
James is not beautiful.
Arlen is not condemned.
Lester is not environmental.
Jesse is not beautiful.
Jesse is sweet.If Lester is not uninterested, then Arlen is not untidy, and vice versa.
If someone is untidy and beautiful, then he is uninterested, and vice versa.
Someone who is not sweet is always not condemned.
It can be concluded that Arlen is not environmental once knowing that Lester is not beautiful.
If there is at least one people who is both not beautiful and environmental, then Lester is not untidy.
Rosie being not condemned is equivalent to Lester being not uninterested and Arlen being sweet.
Someone is not sweet if and only if he is not beautiful.
If Rosie is not sweet, then Clark is environmental.
If there is someone who is sweet, then Gideon is uninterested.
If everyone is not condemned, then James is beautiful and Arlen is not uninterested.
If someone is not condemned and untidy, then he is sweet, and vice versa.
If someone is not uninterested, then he is not condemned, and vice versa. | Gideon is not environmental. | contradiction |
Clark is not environmental.
Rosie is uninterested.
Jesse is not condemned.
Rosie is sweet.
Rosie is not condemned.
Gideon is environmental.
Gideon is not untidy.
James is not beautiful.
Arlen is not condemned.
Lester is not environmental.
Jesse is not beautiful.
Jesse is sweet.If Lester is not uninterested, then Arlen is not untidy, and vice versa.
If someone is untidy and beautiful, then he is uninterested, and vice versa.
Someone who is not sweet is always not condemned.
It can be concluded that Arlen is not environmental once knowing that Lester is not beautiful.
If there is at least one people who is both not beautiful and environmental, then Lester is not untidy.
Rosie being not condemned is equivalent to Lester being not uninterested and Arlen being sweet.
Someone is not sweet if and only if he is not beautiful.
If Rosie is not sweet, then Clark is environmental.
If there is someone who is sweet, then Gideon is uninterested.
If everyone is not condemned, then James is beautiful and Arlen is not uninterested.
If someone is not condemned and untidy, then he is sweet, and vice versa.
If someone is not uninterested, then he is not condemned, and vice versa. | Gideon is not untidy. | self_contradiction |
Clark is not environmental.
Rosie is uninterested.
Jesse is not condemned.
Rosie is sweet.
Rosie is not condemned.
Gideon is environmental.
Gideon is not untidy.
James is not beautiful.
Arlen is not condemned.
Lester is not environmental.
Jesse is not beautiful.
Jesse is sweet.If Lester is not uninterested, then Arlen is not untidy, and vice versa.
If someone is untidy and beautiful, then he is uninterested, and vice versa.
Someone who is not sweet is always not condemned.
It can be concluded that Arlen is not environmental once knowing that Lester is not beautiful.
If there is at least one people who is both not beautiful and environmental, then Lester is not untidy.
Rosie being not condemned is equivalent to Lester being not uninterested and Arlen being sweet.
Someone is not sweet if and only if he is not beautiful.
If Rosie is not sweet, then Clark is environmental.
If there is someone who is sweet, then Gideon is uninterested.
If everyone is not condemned, then James is beautiful and Arlen is not uninterested.
If someone is not condemned and untidy, then he is sweet, and vice versa.
If someone is not uninterested, then he is not condemned, and vice versa. | James is uninterested. | contradiction |
Clark is not environmental.
Rosie is uninterested.
Jesse is not condemned.
Rosie is sweet.
Rosie is not condemned.
Gideon is environmental.
Gideon is not untidy.
James is not beautiful.
Arlen is not condemned.
Lester is not environmental.
Jesse is not beautiful.
Jesse is sweet.If Lester is not uninterested, then Arlen is not untidy, and vice versa.
If someone is untidy and beautiful, then he is uninterested, and vice versa.
Someone who is not sweet is always not condemned.
It can be concluded that Arlen is not environmental once knowing that Lester is not beautiful.
If there is at least one people who is both not beautiful and environmental, then Lester is not untidy.
Rosie being not condemned is equivalent to Lester being not uninterested and Arlen being sweet.
Someone is not sweet if and only if he is not beautiful.
If Rosie is not sweet, then Clark is environmental.
If there is someone who is sweet, then Gideon is uninterested.
If everyone is not condemned, then James is beautiful and Arlen is not uninterested.
If someone is not condemned and untidy, then he is sweet, and vice versa.
If someone is not uninterested, then he is not condemned, and vice versa. | Rosie is not beautiful. | contradiction |
Clark is not environmental.
Rosie is uninterested.
Jesse is not condemned.
Rosie is sweet.
Rosie is not condemned.
Gideon is environmental.
Gideon is not untidy.
James is not beautiful.
Arlen is not condemned.
Lester is not environmental.
Jesse is not beautiful.
Jesse is sweet.If Lester is not uninterested, then Arlen is not untidy, and vice versa.
If someone is untidy and beautiful, then he is uninterested, and vice versa.
Someone who is not sweet is always not condemned.
It can be concluded that Arlen is not environmental once knowing that Lester is not beautiful.
If there is at least one people who is both not beautiful and environmental, then Lester is not untidy.
Rosie being not condemned is equivalent to Lester being not uninterested and Arlen being sweet.
Someone is not sweet if and only if he is not beautiful.
If Rosie is not sweet, then Clark is environmental.
If there is someone who is sweet, then Gideon is uninterested.
If everyone is not condemned, then James is beautiful and Arlen is not uninterested.
If someone is not condemned and untidy, then he is sweet, and vice versa.
If someone is not uninterested, then he is not condemned, and vice versa. | Clark is not environmental. | entailment |
Clark is not environmental.
Rosie is uninterested.
Jesse is not condemned.
Rosie is sweet.
Rosie is not condemned.
Gideon is environmental.
Gideon is not untidy.
James is not beautiful.
Arlen is not condemned.
Lester is not environmental.
Jesse is not beautiful.
Jesse is sweet.If Lester is not uninterested, then Arlen is not untidy, and vice versa.
If someone is untidy and beautiful, then he is uninterested, and vice versa.
Someone who is not sweet is always not condemned.
It can be concluded that Arlen is not environmental once knowing that Lester is not beautiful.
If there is at least one people who is both not beautiful and environmental, then Lester is not untidy.
Rosie being not condemned is equivalent to Lester being not uninterested and Arlen being sweet.
Someone is not sweet if and only if he is not beautiful.
If Rosie is not sweet, then Clark is environmental.
If there is someone who is sweet, then Gideon is uninterested.
If everyone is not condemned, then James is beautiful and Arlen is not uninterested.
If someone is not condemned and untidy, then he is sweet, and vice versa.
If someone is not uninterested, then he is not condemned, and vice versa. | Gideon is uninterested. | entailment |
Clark is not environmental.
Rosie is uninterested.
Jesse is not condemned.
Rosie is sweet.
Rosie is not condemned.
Gideon is environmental.
Gideon is not untidy.
James is not beautiful.
Arlen is not condemned.
Lester is not environmental.
Jesse is not beautiful.
Jesse is sweet.If Lester is not uninterested, then Arlen is not untidy, and vice versa.
If someone is untidy and beautiful, then he is uninterested, and vice versa.
Someone who is not sweet is always not condemned.
It can be concluded that Arlen is not environmental once knowing that Lester is not beautiful.
If there is at least one people who is both not beautiful and environmental, then Lester is not untidy.
Rosie being not condemned is equivalent to Lester being not uninterested and Arlen being sweet.
Someone is not sweet if and only if he is not beautiful.
If Rosie is not sweet, then Clark is environmental.
If there is someone who is sweet, then Gideon is uninterested.
If everyone is not condemned, then James is beautiful and Arlen is not uninterested.
If someone is not condemned and untidy, then he is sweet, and vice versa.
If someone is not uninterested, then he is not condemned, and vice versa. | Rosie is uninterested. | self_contradiction |
Clark is not environmental.
Rosie is uninterested.
Jesse is not condemned.
Rosie is sweet.
Rosie is not condemned.
Gideon is environmental.
Gideon is not untidy.
James is not beautiful.
Arlen is not condemned.
Lester is not environmental.
Jesse is not beautiful.
Jesse is sweet.If Lester is not uninterested, then Arlen is not untidy, and vice versa.
If someone is untidy and beautiful, then he is uninterested, and vice versa.
Someone who is not sweet is always not condemned.
It can be concluded that Arlen is not environmental once knowing that Lester is not beautiful.
If there is at least one people who is both not beautiful and environmental, then Lester is not untidy.
Rosie being not condemned is equivalent to Lester being not uninterested and Arlen being sweet.
Someone is not sweet if and only if he is not beautiful.
If Rosie is not sweet, then Clark is environmental.
If there is someone who is sweet, then Gideon is uninterested.
If everyone is not condemned, then James is beautiful and Arlen is not uninterested.
If someone is not condemned and untidy, then he is sweet, and vice versa.
If someone is not uninterested, then he is not condemned, and vice versa. | Arlen is not environmental. | neutral |
Clark is not environmental.
Rosie is uninterested.
Jesse is not condemned.
Rosie is sweet.
Rosie is not condemned.
Gideon is environmental.
Gideon is not untidy.
James is not beautiful.
Arlen is not condemned.
Lester is not environmental.
Jesse is not beautiful.
Jesse is sweet.If Lester is not uninterested, then Arlen is not untidy, and vice versa.
If someone is untidy and beautiful, then he is uninterested, and vice versa.
Someone who is not sweet is always not condemned.
It can be concluded that Arlen is not environmental once knowing that Lester is not beautiful.
If there is at least one people who is both not beautiful and environmental, then Lester is not untidy.
Rosie being not condemned is equivalent to Lester being not uninterested and Arlen being sweet.
Someone is not sweet if and only if he is not beautiful.
If Rosie is not sweet, then Clark is environmental.
If there is someone who is sweet, then Gideon is uninterested.
If everyone is not condemned, then James is beautiful and Arlen is not uninterested.
If someone is not condemned and untidy, then he is sweet, and vice versa.
If someone is not uninterested, then he is not condemned, and vice versa. | Lester is sweet. | neutral |
Clark is not environmental.
Rosie is uninterested.
Jesse is not condemned.
Rosie is sweet.
Rosie is not condemned.
Gideon is environmental.
Gideon is not untidy.
James is not beautiful.
Arlen is not condemned.
Lester is not environmental.
Jesse is not beautiful.
Jesse is sweet.If Lester is not uninterested, then Arlen is not untidy, and vice versa.
If someone is untidy and beautiful, then he is uninterested, and vice versa.
Someone who is not sweet is always not condemned.
It can be concluded that Arlen is not environmental once knowing that Lester is not beautiful.
If there is at least one people who is both not beautiful and environmental, then Lester is not untidy.
Rosie being not condemned is equivalent to Lester being not uninterested and Arlen being sweet.
Someone is not sweet if and only if he is not beautiful.
If Rosie is not sweet, then Clark is environmental.
If there is someone who is sweet, then Gideon is uninterested.
If everyone is not condemned, then James is beautiful and Arlen is not uninterested.
If someone is not condemned and untidy, then he is sweet, and vice versa.
If someone is not uninterested, then he is not condemned, and vice versa. | Clark is beautiful. | neutral |
Fred is exuberant.
Jacob is creepy.
Jacob is safe.
Olaf is safe.
Fred is not creepy.
Sidney is exuberant.
Jacob is not clever.
Mila is not obedient.
Timothy is not obedient.
Sidney is obedient.
Mila is not expensive.
Timothy is safe.if there is at least one people who is safe and creepy, then Mila is obedient and Jacob is expensive.
If there is someone who is not creepy, then Mila is exuberant and Fred is expensive.
If all people are not safe or not clever, then Sidney is expensive.
If Sidney is not obedient or Jacob is creepy, then Fred is safe.
If someone is expensive and not creepy, then he is not clever and safe.
It can be concluded that Olaf is not exuberant and Jacob is clever once knowing that Sidney is not expensive.
It can be concluded that Aubrey is obedient once knowing that Aubrey is not creepy and Jacob is not safe.
Someone is safe and obedient if and only if he is not creepy.
Sidney is creepy if and only if Jacob is not clever.
If everyone is clever, then Aubrey is expensive.
All exuberant people are not expensive.
If someone is exuberant, then he is both obedient and not safe. | Mila is obedient. | self_contradiction |
Fred is exuberant.
Jacob is creepy.
Jacob is safe.
Olaf is safe.
Fred is not creepy.
Sidney is exuberant.
Jacob is not clever.
Mila is not obedient.
Timothy is not obedient.
Sidney is obedient.
Mila is not expensive.
Timothy is safe.if there is at least one people who is safe and creepy, then Mila is obedient and Jacob is expensive.
If there is someone who is not creepy, then Mila is exuberant and Fred is expensive.
If all people are not safe or not clever, then Sidney is expensive.
If Sidney is not obedient or Jacob is creepy, then Fred is safe.
If someone is expensive and not creepy, then he is not clever and safe.
It can be concluded that Olaf is not exuberant and Jacob is clever once knowing that Sidney is not expensive.
It can be concluded that Aubrey is obedient once knowing that Aubrey is not creepy and Jacob is not safe.
Someone is safe and obedient if and only if he is not creepy.
Sidney is creepy if and only if Jacob is not clever.
If everyone is clever, then Aubrey is expensive.
All exuberant people are not expensive.
If someone is exuberant, then he is both obedient and not safe. | Jacob is not clever. | self_contradiction |
Fred is exuberant.
Jacob is creepy.
Jacob is safe.
Olaf is safe.
Fred is not creepy.
Sidney is exuberant.
Jacob is not clever.
Mila is not obedient.
Timothy is not obedient.
Sidney is obedient.
Mila is not expensive.
Timothy is safe.if there is at least one people who is safe and creepy, then Mila is obedient and Jacob is expensive.
If there is someone who is not creepy, then Mila is exuberant and Fred is expensive.
If all people are not safe or not clever, then Sidney is expensive.
If Sidney is not obedient or Jacob is creepy, then Fred is safe.
If someone is expensive and not creepy, then he is not clever and safe.
It can be concluded that Olaf is not exuberant and Jacob is clever once knowing that Sidney is not expensive.
It can be concluded that Aubrey is obedient once knowing that Aubrey is not creepy and Jacob is not safe.
Someone is safe and obedient if and only if he is not creepy.
Sidney is creepy if and only if Jacob is not clever.
If everyone is clever, then Aubrey is expensive.
All exuberant people are not expensive.
If someone is exuberant, then he is both obedient and not safe. | Fred is not obedient. | contradiction |
Fred is exuberant.
Jacob is creepy.
Jacob is safe.
Olaf is safe.
Fred is not creepy.
Sidney is exuberant.
Jacob is not clever.
Mila is not obedient.
Timothy is not obedient.
Sidney is obedient.
Mila is not expensive.
Timothy is safe.if there is at least one people who is safe and creepy, then Mila is obedient and Jacob is expensive.
If there is someone who is not creepy, then Mila is exuberant and Fred is expensive.
If all people are not safe or not clever, then Sidney is expensive.
If Sidney is not obedient or Jacob is creepy, then Fred is safe.
If someone is expensive and not creepy, then he is not clever and safe.
It can be concluded that Olaf is not exuberant and Jacob is clever once knowing that Sidney is not expensive.
It can be concluded that Aubrey is obedient once knowing that Aubrey is not creepy and Jacob is not safe.
Someone is safe and obedient if and only if he is not creepy.
Sidney is creepy if and only if Jacob is not clever.
If everyone is clever, then Aubrey is expensive.
All exuberant people are not expensive.
If someone is exuberant, then he is both obedient and not safe. | Timothy is not expensive. | neutral |
Fred is exuberant.
Jacob is creepy.
Jacob is safe.
Olaf is safe.
Fred is not creepy.
Sidney is exuberant.
Jacob is not clever.
Mila is not obedient.
Timothy is not obedient.
Sidney is obedient.
Mila is not expensive.
Timothy is safe.if there is at least one people who is safe and creepy, then Mila is obedient and Jacob is expensive.
If there is someone who is not creepy, then Mila is exuberant and Fred is expensive.
If all people are not safe or not clever, then Sidney is expensive.
If Sidney is not obedient or Jacob is creepy, then Fred is safe.
If someone is expensive and not creepy, then he is not clever and safe.
It can be concluded that Olaf is not exuberant and Jacob is clever once knowing that Sidney is not expensive.
It can be concluded that Aubrey is obedient once knowing that Aubrey is not creepy and Jacob is not safe.
Someone is safe and obedient if and only if he is not creepy.
Sidney is creepy if and only if Jacob is not clever.
If everyone is clever, then Aubrey is expensive.
All exuberant people are not expensive.
If someone is exuberant, then he is both obedient and not safe. | Timothy is obedient. | contradiction |
Fred is exuberant.
Jacob is creepy.
Jacob is safe.
Olaf is safe.
Fred is not creepy.
Sidney is exuberant.
Jacob is not clever.
Mila is not obedient.
Timothy is not obedient.
Sidney is obedient.
Mila is not expensive.
Timothy is safe.if there is at least one people who is safe and creepy, then Mila is obedient and Jacob is expensive.
If there is someone who is not creepy, then Mila is exuberant and Fred is expensive.
If all people are not safe or not clever, then Sidney is expensive.
If Sidney is not obedient or Jacob is creepy, then Fred is safe.
If someone is expensive and not creepy, then he is not clever and safe.
It can be concluded that Olaf is not exuberant and Jacob is clever once knowing that Sidney is not expensive.
It can be concluded that Aubrey is obedient once knowing that Aubrey is not creepy and Jacob is not safe.
Someone is safe and obedient if and only if he is not creepy.
Sidney is creepy if and only if Jacob is not clever.
If everyone is clever, then Aubrey is expensive.
All exuberant people are not expensive.
If someone is exuberant, then he is both obedient and not safe. | Olaf is exuberant. | contradiction |
Fred is exuberant.
Jacob is creepy.
Jacob is safe.
Olaf is safe.
Fred is not creepy.
Sidney is exuberant.
Jacob is not clever.
Mila is not obedient.
Timothy is not obedient.
Sidney is obedient.
Mila is not expensive.
Timothy is safe.if there is at least one people who is safe and creepy, then Mila is obedient and Jacob is expensive.
If there is someone who is not creepy, then Mila is exuberant and Fred is expensive.
If all people are not safe or not clever, then Sidney is expensive.
If Sidney is not obedient or Jacob is creepy, then Fred is safe.
If someone is expensive and not creepy, then he is not clever and safe.
It can be concluded that Olaf is not exuberant and Jacob is clever once knowing that Sidney is not expensive.
It can be concluded that Aubrey is obedient once knowing that Aubrey is not creepy and Jacob is not safe.
Someone is safe and obedient if and only if he is not creepy.
Sidney is creepy if and only if Jacob is not clever.
If everyone is clever, then Aubrey is expensive.
All exuberant people are not expensive.
If someone is exuberant, then he is both obedient and not safe. | Mila is exuberant. | entailment |
Fred is exuberant.
Jacob is creepy.
Jacob is safe.
Olaf is safe.
Fred is not creepy.
Sidney is exuberant.
Jacob is not clever.
Mila is not obedient.
Timothy is not obedient.
Sidney is obedient.
Mila is not expensive.
Timothy is safe.if there is at least one people who is safe and creepy, then Mila is obedient and Jacob is expensive.
If there is someone who is not creepy, then Mila is exuberant and Fred is expensive.
If all people are not safe or not clever, then Sidney is expensive.
If Sidney is not obedient or Jacob is creepy, then Fred is safe.
If someone is expensive and not creepy, then he is not clever and safe.
It can be concluded that Olaf is not exuberant and Jacob is clever once knowing that Sidney is not expensive.
It can be concluded that Aubrey is obedient once knowing that Aubrey is not creepy and Jacob is not safe.
Someone is safe and obedient if and only if he is not creepy.
Sidney is creepy if and only if Jacob is not clever.
If everyone is clever, then Aubrey is expensive.
All exuberant people are not expensive.
If someone is exuberant, then he is both obedient and not safe. | Jacob is clever. | self_contradiction |
Fred is exuberant.
Jacob is creepy.
Jacob is safe.
Olaf is safe.
Fred is not creepy.
Sidney is exuberant.
Jacob is not clever.
Mila is not obedient.
Timothy is not obedient.
Sidney is obedient.
Mila is not expensive.
Timothy is safe.if there is at least one people who is safe and creepy, then Mila is obedient and Jacob is expensive.
If there is someone who is not creepy, then Mila is exuberant and Fred is expensive.
If all people are not safe or not clever, then Sidney is expensive.
If Sidney is not obedient or Jacob is creepy, then Fred is safe.
If someone is expensive and not creepy, then he is not clever and safe.
It can be concluded that Olaf is not exuberant and Jacob is clever once knowing that Sidney is not expensive.
It can be concluded that Aubrey is obedient once knowing that Aubrey is not creepy and Jacob is not safe.
Someone is safe and obedient if and only if he is not creepy.
Sidney is creepy if and only if Jacob is not clever.
If everyone is clever, then Aubrey is expensive.
All exuberant people are not expensive.
If someone is exuberant, then he is both obedient and not safe. | Olaf is not creepy. | neutral |
Fred is exuberant.
Jacob is creepy.
Jacob is safe.
Olaf is safe.
Fred is not creepy.
Sidney is exuberant.
Jacob is not clever.
Mila is not obedient.
Timothy is not obedient.
Sidney is obedient.
Mila is not expensive.
Timothy is safe.if there is at least one people who is safe and creepy, then Mila is obedient and Jacob is expensive.
If there is someone who is not creepy, then Mila is exuberant and Fred is expensive.
If all people are not safe or not clever, then Sidney is expensive.
If Sidney is not obedient or Jacob is creepy, then Fred is safe.
If someone is expensive and not creepy, then he is not clever and safe.
It can be concluded that Olaf is not exuberant and Jacob is clever once knowing that Sidney is not expensive.
It can be concluded that Aubrey is obedient once knowing that Aubrey is not creepy and Jacob is not safe.
Someone is safe and obedient if and only if he is not creepy.
Sidney is creepy if and only if Jacob is not clever.
If everyone is clever, then Aubrey is expensive.
All exuberant people are not expensive.
If someone is exuberant, then he is both obedient and not safe. | Mila is clever. | neutral |
Fred is exuberant.
Jacob is creepy.
Jacob is safe.
Olaf is safe.
Fred is not creepy.
Sidney is exuberant.
Jacob is not clever.
Mila is not obedient.
Timothy is not obedient.
Sidney is obedient.
Mila is not expensive.
Timothy is safe.if there is at least one people who is safe and creepy, then Mila is obedient and Jacob is expensive.
If there is someone who is not creepy, then Mila is exuberant and Fred is expensive.
If all people are not safe or not clever, then Sidney is expensive.
If Sidney is not obedient or Jacob is creepy, then Fred is safe.
If someone is expensive and not creepy, then he is not clever and safe.
It can be concluded that Olaf is not exuberant and Jacob is clever once knowing that Sidney is not expensive.
It can be concluded that Aubrey is obedient once knowing that Aubrey is not creepy and Jacob is not safe.
Someone is safe and obedient if and only if he is not creepy.
Sidney is creepy if and only if Jacob is not clever.
If everyone is clever, then Aubrey is expensive.
All exuberant people are not expensive.
If someone is exuberant, then he is both obedient and not safe. | Sidney is not safe. | entailment |
Fred is exuberant.
Jacob is creepy.
Jacob is safe.
Olaf is safe.
Fred is not creepy.
Sidney is exuberant.
Jacob is not clever.
Mila is not obedient.
Timothy is not obedient.
Sidney is obedient.
Mila is not expensive.
Timothy is safe.if there is at least one people who is safe and creepy, then Mila is obedient and Jacob is expensive.
If there is someone who is not creepy, then Mila is exuberant and Fred is expensive.
If all people are not safe or not clever, then Sidney is expensive.
If Sidney is not obedient or Jacob is creepy, then Fred is safe.
If someone is expensive and not creepy, then he is not clever and safe.
It can be concluded that Olaf is not exuberant and Jacob is clever once knowing that Sidney is not expensive.
It can be concluded that Aubrey is obedient once knowing that Aubrey is not creepy and Jacob is not safe.
Someone is safe and obedient if and only if he is not creepy.
Sidney is creepy if and only if Jacob is not clever.
If everyone is clever, then Aubrey is expensive.
All exuberant people are not expensive.
If someone is exuberant, then he is both obedient and not safe. | Sidney is safe. | contradiction |
Fred is exuberant.
Jacob is creepy.
Jacob is safe.
Olaf is safe.
Fred is not creepy.
Sidney is exuberant.
Jacob is not clever.
Mila is not obedient.
Timothy is not obedient.
Sidney is obedient.
Mila is not expensive.
Timothy is safe.if there is at least one people who is safe and creepy, then Mila is obedient and Jacob is expensive.
If there is someone who is not creepy, then Mila is exuberant and Fred is expensive.
If all people are not safe or not clever, then Sidney is expensive.
If Sidney is not obedient or Jacob is creepy, then Fred is safe.
If someone is expensive and not creepy, then he is not clever and safe.
It can be concluded that Olaf is not exuberant and Jacob is clever once knowing that Sidney is not expensive.
It can be concluded that Aubrey is obedient once knowing that Aubrey is not creepy and Jacob is not safe.
Someone is safe and obedient if and only if he is not creepy.
Sidney is creepy if and only if Jacob is not clever.
If everyone is clever, then Aubrey is expensive.
All exuberant people are not expensive.
If someone is exuberant, then he is both obedient and not safe. | Jacob is not expensive. | contradiction |
Fred is exuberant.
Jacob is creepy.
Jacob is safe.
Olaf is safe.
Fred is not creepy.
Sidney is exuberant.
Jacob is not clever.
Mila is not obedient.
Timothy is not obedient.
Sidney is obedient.
Mila is not expensive.
Timothy is safe.if there is at least one people who is safe and creepy, then Mila is obedient and Jacob is expensive.
If there is someone who is not creepy, then Mila is exuberant and Fred is expensive.
If all people are not safe or not clever, then Sidney is expensive.
If Sidney is not obedient or Jacob is creepy, then Fred is safe.
If someone is expensive and not creepy, then he is not clever and safe.
It can be concluded that Olaf is not exuberant and Jacob is clever once knowing that Sidney is not expensive.
It can be concluded that Aubrey is obedient once knowing that Aubrey is not creepy and Jacob is not safe.
Someone is safe and obedient if and only if he is not creepy.
Sidney is creepy if and only if Jacob is not clever.
If everyone is clever, then Aubrey is expensive.
All exuberant people are not expensive.
If someone is exuberant, then he is both obedient and not safe. | Sidney is not expensive. | entailment |
Fred is exuberant.
Jacob is creepy.
Jacob is safe.
Olaf is safe.
Fred is not creepy.
Sidney is exuberant.
Jacob is not clever.
Mila is not obedient.
Timothy is not obedient.
Sidney is obedient.
Mila is not expensive.
Timothy is safe.if there is at least one people who is safe and creepy, then Mila is obedient and Jacob is expensive.
If there is someone who is not creepy, then Mila is exuberant and Fred is expensive.
If all people are not safe or not clever, then Sidney is expensive.
If Sidney is not obedient or Jacob is creepy, then Fred is safe.
If someone is expensive and not creepy, then he is not clever and safe.
It can be concluded that Olaf is not exuberant and Jacob is clever once knowing that Sidney is not expensive.
It can be concluded that Aubrey is obedient once knowing that Aubrey is not creepy and Jacob is not safe.
Someone is safe and obedient if and only if he is not creepy.
Sidney is creepy if and only if Jacob is not clever.
If everyone is clever, then Aubrey is expensive.
All exuberant people are not expensive.
If someone is exuberant, then he is both obedient and not safe. | Aubrey is safe. | neutral |
Fred is exuberant.
Jacob is creepy.
Jacob is safe.
Olaf is safe.
Fred is not creepy.
Sidney is exuberant.
Jacob is not clever.
Mila is not obedient.
Timothy is not obedient.
Sidney is obedient.
Mila is not expensive.
Timothy is safe.if there is at least one people who is safe and creepy, then Mila is obedient and Jacob is expensive.
If there is someone who is not creepy, then Mila is exuberant and Fred is expensive.
If all people are not safe or not clever, then Sidney is expensive.
If Sidney is not obedient or Jacob is creepy, then Fred is safe.
If someone is expensive and not creepy, then he is not clever and safe.
It can be concluded that Olaf is not exuberant and Jacob is clever once knowing that Sidney is not expensive.
It can be concluded that Aubrey is obedient once knowing that Aubrey is not creepy and Jacob is not safe.
Someone is safe and obedient if and only if he is not creepy.
Sidney is creepy if and only if Jacob is not clever.
If everyone is clever, then Aubrey is expensive.
All exuberant people are not expensive.
If someone is exuberant, then he is both obedient and not safe. | Aubrey is not creepy. | neutral |
Fred is exuberant.
Jacob is creepy.
Jacob is safe.
Olaf is safe.
Fred is not creepy.
Sidney is exuberant.
Jacob is not clever.
Mila is not obedient.
Timothy is not obedient.
Sidney is obedient.
Mila is not expensive.
Timothy is safe.if there is at least one people who is safe and creepy, then Mila is obedient and Jacob is expensive.
If there is someone who is not creepy, then Mila is exuberant and Fred is expensive.
If all people are not safe or not clever, then Sidney is expensive.
If Sidney is not obedient or Jacob is creepy, then Fred is safe.
If someone is expensive and not creepy, then he is not clever and safe.
It can be concluded that Olaf is not exuberant and Jacob is clever once knowing that Sidney is not expensive.
It can be concluded that Aubrey is obedient once knowing that Aubrey is not creepy and Jacob is not safe.
Someone is safe and obedient if and only if he is not creepy.
Sidney is creepy if and only if Jacob is not clever.
If everyone is clever, then Aubrey is expensive.
All exuberant people are not expensive.
If someone is exuberant, then he is both obedient and not safe. | Fred is not safe. | self_contradiction |
Fred is exuberant.
Jacob is creepy.
Jacob is safe.
Olaf is safe.
Fred is not creepy.
Sidney is exuberant.
Jacob is not clever.
Mila is not obedient.
Timothy is not obedient.
Sidney is obedient.
Mila is not expensive.
Timothy is safe.if there is at least one people who is safe and creepy, then Mila is obedient and Jacob is expensive.
If there is someone who is not creepy, then Mila is exuberant and Fred is expensive.
If all people are not safe or not clever, then Sidney is expensive.
If Sidney is not obedient or Jacob is creepy, then Fred is safe.
If someone is expensive and not creepy, then he is not clever and safe.
It can be concluded that Olaf is not exuberant and Jacob is clever once knowing that Sidney is not expensive.
It can be concluded that Aubrey is obedient once knowing that Aubrey is not creepy and Jacob is not safe.
Someone is safe and obedient if and only if he is not creepy.
Sidney is creepy if and only if Jacob is not clever.
If everyone is clever, then Aubrey is expensive.
All exuberant people are not expensive.
If someone is exuberant, then he is both obedient and not safe. | Fred is not creepy. | entailment |
Fred is exuberant.
Jacob is creepy.
Jacob is safe.
Olaf is safe.
Fred is not creepy.
Sidney is exuberant.
Jacob is not clever.
Mila is not obedient.
Timothy is not obedient.
Sidney is obedient.
Mila is not expensive.
Timothy is safe.if there is at least one people who is safe and creepy, then Mila is obedient and Jacob is expensive.
If there is someone who is not creepy, then Mila is exuberant and Fred is expensive.
If all people are not safe or not clever, then Sidney is expensive.
If Sidney is not obedient or Jacob is creepy, then Fred is safe.
If someone is expensive and not creepy, then he is not clever and safe.
It can be concluded that Olaf is not exuberant and Jacob is clever once knowing that Sidney is not expensive.
It can be concluded that Aubrey is obedient once knowing that Aubrey is not creepy and Jacob is not safe.
Someone is safe and obedient if and only if he is not creepy.
Sidney is creepy if and only if Jacob is not clever.
If everyone is clever, then Aubrey is expensive.
All exuberant people are not expensive.
If someone is exuberant, then he is both obedient and not safe. | Fred is not expensive. | self_contradiction |
Fred is exuberant.
Jacob is creepy.
Jacob is safe.
Olaf is safe.
Fred is not creepy.
Sidney is exuberant.
Jacob is not clever.
Mila is not obedient.
Timothy is not obedient.
Sidney is obedient.
Mila is not expensive.
Timothy is safe.if there is at least one people who is safe and creepy, then Mila is obedient and Jacob is expensive.
If there is someone who is not creepy, then Mila is exuberant and Fred is expensive.
If all people are not safe or not clever, then Sidney is expensive.
If Sidney is not obedient or Jacob is creepy, then Fred is safe.
If someone is expensive and not creepy, then he is not clever and safe.
It can be concluded that Olaf is not exuberant and Jacob is clever once knowing that Sidney is not expensive.
It can be concluded that Aubrey is obedient once knowing that Aubrey is not creepy and Jacob is not safe.
Someone is safe and obedient if and only if he is not creepy.
Sidney is creepy if and only if Jacob is not clever.
If everyone is clever, then Aubrey is expensive.
All exuberant people are not expensive.
If someone is exuberant, then he is both obedient and not safe. | Fred is exuberant. | entailment |
Mila is not cautious.
Graham is not large.
Mila is reserved.
Coleman is not informal.
Mila is not informal.
Chapman is cautious.
Brian is not cautious.
Ramsey is not large.
Melody is not harsh.
Graham is not reserved.
Brian is harsh.
Graham is not harsh.Someone is not informal if and only if he is not harsh.
If there is someone who is harsh, then Graham is not large.
If someone is cautious and informal, then he is both cute and reserved, and vice versa.
If Brian is cute, then Mila is reserved, and vice versa.
If someone is reserved, then he is both large and cute.
If someone is large, then he is not cautious.
Someone is harsh if and only if he is cautious.
Someone who is eithor cute or not reserved is always large.
If there is someone who is either cute or reserved, then Melody is not cautious.
If there is someone who is reserved, then Brian is cute.
Brian being not harsh and Brian being not cautious imply that Graham is cute.
Someone who is not harsh is always large. | Graham is harsh. | contradiction |
Mila is not cautious.
Graham is not large.
Mila is reserved.
Coleman is not informal.
Mila is not informal.
Chapman is cautious.
Brian is not cautious.
Ramsey is not large.
Melody is not harsh.
Graham is not reserved.
Brian is harsh.
Graham is not harsh.Someone is not informal if and only if he is not harsh.
If there is someone who is harsh, then Graham is not large.
If someone is cautious and informal, then he is both cute and reserved, and vice versa.
If Brian is cute, then Mila is reserved, and vice versa.
If someone is reserved, then he is both large and cute.
If someone is large, then he is not cautious.
Someone is harsh if and only if he is cautious.
Someone who is eithor cute or not reserved is always large.
If there is someone who is either cute or reserved, then Melody is not cautious.
If there is someone who is reserved, then Brian is cute.
Brian being not harsh and Brian being not cautious imply that Graham is cute.
Someone who is not harsh is always large. | Mila is harsh. | self_contradiction |
Mila is not cautious.
Graham is not large.
Mila is reserved.
Coleman is not informal.
Mila is not informal.
Chapman is cautious.
Brian is not cautious.
Ramsey is not large.
Melody is not harsh.
Graham is not reserved.
Brian is harsh.
Graham is not harsh.Someone is not informal if and only if he is not harsh.
If there is someone who is harsh, then Graham is not large.
If someone is cautious and informal, then he is both cute and reserved, and vice versa.
If Brian is cute, then Mila is reserved, and vice versa.
If someone is reserved, then he is both large and cute.
If someone is large, then he is not cautious.
Someone is harsh if and only if he is cautious.
Someone who is eithor cute or not reserved is always large.
If there is someone who is either cute or reserved, then Melody is not cautious.
If there is someone who is reserved, then Brian is cute.
Brian being not harsh and Brian being not cautious imply that Graham is cute.
Someone who is not harsh is always large. | Graham is informal. | contradiction |
Mila is not cautious.
Graham is not large.
Mila is reserved.
Coleman is not informal.
Mila is not informal.
Chapman is cautious.
Brian is not cautious.
Ramsey is not large.
Melody is not harsh.
Graham is not reserved.
Brian is harsh.
Graham is not harsh.Someone is not informal if and only if he is not harsh.
If there is someone who is harsh, then Graham is not large.
If someone is cautious and informal, then he is both cute and reserved, and vice versa.
If Brian is cute, then Mila is reserved, and vice versa.
If someone is reserved, then he is both large and cute.
If someone is large, then he is not cautious.
Someone is harsh if and only if he is cautious.
Someone who is eithor cute or not reserved is always large.
If there is someone who is either cute or reserved, then Melody is not cautious.
If there is someone who is reserved, then Brian is cute.
Brian being not harsh and Brian being not cautious imply that Graham is cute.
Someone who is not harsh is always large. | Melody is not cautious. | entailment |
Mila is not cautious.
Graham is not large.
Mila is reserved.
Coleman is not informal.
Mila is not informal.
Chapman is cautious.
Brian is not cautious.
Ramsey is not large.
Melody is not harsh.
Graham is not reserved.
Brian is harsh.
Graham is not harsh.Someone is not informal if and only if he is not harsh.
If there is someone who is harsh, then Graham is not large.
If someone is cautious and informal, then he is both cute and reserved, and vice versa.
If Brian is cute, then Mila is reserved, and vice versa.
If someone is reserved, then he is both large and cute.
If someone is large, then he is not cautious.
Someone is harsh if and only if he is cautious.
Someone who is eithor cute or not reserved is always large.
If there is someone who is either cute or reserved, then Melody is not cautious.
If there is someone who is reserved, then Brian is cute.
Brian being not harsh and Brian being not cautious imply that Graham is cute.
Someone who is not harsh is always large. | Mila is informal. | self_contradiction |
Mila is not cautious.
Graham is not large.
Mila is reserved.
Coleman is not informal.
Mila is not informal.
Chapman is cautious.
Brian is not cautious.
Ramsey is not large.
Melody is not harsh.
Graham is not reserved.
Brian is harsh.
Graham is not harsh.Someone is not informal if and only if he is not harsh.
If there is someone who is harsh, then Graham is not large.
If someone is cautious and informal, then he is both cute and reserved, and vice versa.
If Brian is cute, then Mila is reserved, and vice versa.
If someone is reserved, then he is both large and cute.
If someone is large, then he is not cautious.
Someone is harsh if and only if he is cautious.
Someone who is eithor cute or not reserved is always large.
If there is someone who is either cute or reserved, then Melody is not cautious.
If there is someone who is reserved, then Brian is cute.
Brian being not harsh and Brian being not cautious imply that Graham is cute.
Someone who is not harsh is always large. | Chapman is not large. | neutral |
Mila is not cautious.
Graham is not large.
Mila is reserved.
Coleman is not informal.
Mila is not informal.
Chapman is cautious.
Brian is not cautious.
Ramsey is not large.
Melody is not harsh.
Graham is not reserved.
Brian is harsh.
Graham is not harsh.Someone is not informal if and only if he is not harsh.
If there is someone who is harsh, then Graham is not large.
If someone is cautious and informal, then he is both cute and reserved, and vice versa.
If Brian is cute, then Mila is reserved, and vice versa.
If someone is reserved, then he is both large and cute.
If someone is large, then he is not cautious.
Someone is harsh if and only if he is cautious.
Someone who is eithor cute or not reserved is always large.
If there is someone who is either cute or reserved, then Melody is not cautious.
If there is someone who is reserved, then Brian is cute.
Brian being not harsh and Brian being not cautious imply that Graham is cute.
Someone who is not harsh is always large. | Melody is large. | entailment |
Mila is not cautious.
Graham is not large.
Mila is reserved.
Coleman is not informal.
Mila is not informal.
Chapman is cautious.
Brian is not cautious.
Ramsey is not large.
Melody is not harsh.
Graham is not reserved.
Brian is harsh.
Graham is not harsh.Someone is not informal if and only if he is not harsh.
If there is someone who is harsh, then Graham is not large.
If someone is cautious and informal, then he is both cute and reserved, and vice versa.
If Brian is cute, then Mila is reserved, and vice versa.
If someone is reserved, then he is both large and cute.
If someone is large, then he is not cautious.
Someone is harsh if and only if he is cautious.
Someone who is eithor cute or not reserved is always large.
If there is someone who is either cute or reserved, then Melody is not cautious.
If there is someone who is reserved, then Brian is cute.
Brian being not harsh and Brian being not cautious imply that Graham is cute.
Someone who is not harsh is always large. | Mila is large. | entailment |
Mila is not cautious.
Graham is not large.
Mila is reserved.
Coleman is not informal.
Mila is not informal.
Chapman is cautious.
Brian is not cautious.
Ramsey is not large.
Melody is not harsh.
Graham is not reserved.
Brian is harsh.
Graham is not harsh.Someone is not informal if and only if he is not harsh.
If there is someone who is harsh, then Graham is not large.
If someone is cautious and informal, then he is both cute and reserved, and vice versa.
If Brian is cute, then Mila is reserved, and vice versa.
If someone is reserved, then he is both large and cute.
If someone is large, then he is not cautious.
Someone is harsh if and only if he is cautious.
Someone who is eithor cute or not reserved is always large.
If there is someone who is either cute or reserved, then Melody is not cautious.
If there is someone who is reserved, then Brian is cute.
Brian being not harsh and Brian being not cautious imply that Graham is cute.
Someone who is not harsh is always large. | Chapman is not informal. | neutral |
Mila is not cautious.
Graham is not large.
Mila is reserved.
Coleman is not informal.
Mila is not informal.
Chapman is cautious.
Brian is not cautious.
Ramsey is not large.
Melody is not harsh.
Graham is not reserved.
Brian is harsh.
Graham is not harsh.Someone is not informal if and only if he is not harsh.
If there is someone who is harsh, then Graham is not large.
If someone is cautious and informal, then he is both cute and reserved, and vice versa.
If Brian is cute, then Mila is reserved, and vice versa.
If someone is reserved, then he is both large and cute.
If someone is large, then he is not cautious.
Someone is harsh if and only if he is cautious.
Someone who is eithor cute or not reserved is always large.
If there is someone who is either cute or reserved, then Melody is not cautious.
If there is someone who is reserved, then Brian is cute.
Brian being not harsh and Brian being not cautious imply that Graham is cute.
Someone who is not harsh is always large. | Mila is not harsh. | self_contradiction |
Mila is not cautious.
Graham is not large.
Mila is reserved.
Coleman is not informal.
Mila is not informal.
Chapman is cautious.
Brian is not cautious.
Ramsey is not large.
Melody is not harsh.
Graham is not reserved.
Brian is harsh.
Graham is not harsh.Someone is not informal if and only if he is not harsh.
If there is someone who is harsh, then Graham is not large.
If someone is cautious and informal, then he is both cute and reserved, and vice versa.
If Brian is cute, then Mila is reserved, and vice versa.
If someone is reserved, then he is both large and cute.
If someone is large, then he is not cautious.
Someone is harsh if and only if he is cautious.
Someone who is eithor cute or not reserved is always large.
If there is someone who is either cute or reserved, then Melody is not cautious.
If there is someone who is reserved, then Brian is cute.
Brian being not harsh and Brian being not cautious imply that Graham is cute.
Someone who is not harsh is always large. | Melody is harsh. | contradiction |
Mila is not cautious.
Graham is not large.
Mila is reserved.
Coleman is not informal.
Mila is not informal.
Chapman is cautious.
Brian is not cautious.
Ramsey is not large.
Melody is not harsh.
Graham is not reserved.
Brian is harsh.
Graham is not harsh.Someone is not informal if and only if he is not harsh.
If there is someone who is harsh, then Graham is not large.
If someone is cautious and informal, then he is both cute and reserved, and vice versa.
If Brian is cute, then Mila is reserved, and vice versa.
If someone is reserved, then he is both large and cute.
If someone is large, then he is not cautious.
Someone is harsh if and only if he is cautious.
Someone who is eithor cute or not reserved is always large.
If there is someone who is either cute or reserved, then Melody is not cautious.
If there is someone who is reserved, then Brian is cute.
Brian being not harsh and Brian being not cautious imply that Graham is cute.
Someone who is not harsh is always large. | Melody is not harsh. | entailment |
Mila is not cautious.
Graham is not large.
Mila is reserved.
Coleman is not informal.
Mila is not informal.
Chapman is cautious.
Brian is not cautious.
Ramsey is not large.
Melody is not harsh.
Graham is not reserved.
Brian is harsh.
Graham is not harsh.Someone is not informal if and only if he is not harsh.
If there is someone who is harsh, then Graham is not large.
If someone is cautious and informal, then he is both cute and reserved, and vice versa.
If Brian is cute, then Mila is reserved, and vice versa.
If someone is reserved, then he is both large and cute.
If someone is large, then he is not cautious.
Someone is harsh if and only if he is cautious.
Someone who is eithor cute or not reserved is always large.
If there is someone who is either cute or reserved, then Melody is not cautious.
If there is someone who is reserved, then Brian is cute.
Brian being not harsh and Brian being not cautious imply that Graham is cute.
Someone who is not harsh is always large. | Chapman is informal. | neutral |
Mila is not cautious.
Graham is not large.
Mila is reserved.
Coleman is not informal.
Mila is not informal.
Chapman is cautious.
Brian is not cautious.
Ramsey is not large.
Melody is not harsh.
Graham is not reserved.
Brian is harsh.
Graham is not harsh.Someone is not informal if and only if he is not harsh.
If there is someone who is harsh, then Graham is not large.
If someone is cautious and informal, then he is both cute and reserved, and vice versa.
If Brian is cute, then Mila is reserved, and vice versa.
If someone is reserved, then he is both large and cute.
If someone is large, then he is not cautious.
Someone is harsh if and only if he is cautious.
Someone who is eithor cute or not reserved is always large.
If there is someone who is either cute or reserved, then Melody is not cautious.
If there is someone who is reserved, then Brian is cute.
Brian being not harsh and Brian being not cautious imply that Graham is cute.
Someone who is not harsh is always large. | Ramsey is cute. | neutral |
Mila is not cautious.
Graham is not large.
Mila is reserved.
Coleman is not informal.
Mila is not informal.
Chapman is cautious.
Brian is not cautious.
Ramsey is not large.
Melody is not harsh.
Graham is not reserved.
Brian is harsh.
Graham is not harsh.Someone is not informal if and only if he is not harsh.
If there is someone who is harsh, then Graham is not large.
If someone is cautious and informal, then he is both cute and reserved, and vice versa.
If Brian is cute, then Mila is reserved, and vice versa.
If someone is reserved, then he is both large and cute.
If someone is large, then he is not cautious.
Someone is harsh if and only if he is cautious.
Someone who is eithor cute or not reserved is always large.
If there is someone who is either cute or reserved, then Melody is not cautious.
If there is someone who is reserved, then Brian is cute.
Brian being not harsh and Brian being not cautious imply that Graham is cute.
Someone who is not harsh is always large. | Mila is not cautious. | self_contradiction |
Mila is not cautious.
Graham is not large.
Mila is reserved.
Coleman is not informal.
Mila is not informal.
Chapman is cautious.
Brian is not cautious.
Ramsey is not large.
Melody is not harsh.
Graham is not reserved.
Brian is harsh.
Graham is not harsh.Someone is not informal if and only if he is not harsh.
If there is someone who is harsh, then Graham is not large.
If someone is cautious and informal, then he is both cute and reserved, and vice versa.
If Brian is cute, then Mila is reserved, and vice versa.
If someone is reserved, then he is both large and cute.
If someone is large, then he is not cautious.
Someone is harsh if and only if he is cautious.
Someone who is eithor cute or not reserved is always large.
If there is someone who is either cute or reserved, then Melody is not cautious.
If there is someone who is reserved, then Brian is cute.
Brian being not harsh and Brian being not cautious imply that Graham is cute.
Someone who is not harsh is always large. | Coleman is cautious. | contradiction |
Mila is not cautious.
Graham is not large.
Mila is reserved.
Coleman is not informal.
Mila is not informal.
Chapman is cautious.
Brian is not cautious.
Ramsey is not large.
Melody is not harsh.
Graham is not reserved.
Brian is harsh.
Graham is not harsh.Someone is not informal if and only if he is not harsh.
If there is someone who is harsh, then Graham is not large.
If someone is cautious and informal, then he is both cute and reserved, and vice versa.
If Brian is cute, then Mila is reserved, and vice versa.
If someone is reserved, then he is both large and cute.
If someone is large, then he is not cautious.
Someone is harsh if and only if he is cautious.
Someone who is eithor cute or not reserved is always large.
If there is someone who is either cute or reserved, then Melody is not cautious.
If there is someone who is reserved, then Brian is cute.
Brian being not harsh and Brian being not cautious imply that Graham is cute.
Someone who is not harsh is always large. | Ramsey is informal. | neutral |
Mila is not cautious.
Graham is not large.
Mila is reserved.
Coleman is not informal.
Mila is not informal.
Chapman is cautious.
Brian is not cautious.
Ramsey is not large.
Melody is not harsh.
Graham is not reserved.
Brian is harsh.
Graham is not harsh.Someone is not informal if and only if he is not harsh.
If there is someone who is harsh, then Graham is not large.
If someone is cautious and informal, then he is both cute and reserved, and vice versa.
If Brian is cute, then Mila is reserved, and vice versa.
If someone is reserved, then he is both large and cute.
If someone is large, then he is not cautious.
Someone is harsh if and only if he is cautious.
Someone who is eithor cute or not reserved is always large.
If there is someone who is either cute or reserved, then Melody is not cautious.
If there is someone who is reserved, then Brian is cute.
Brian being not harsh and Brian being not cautious imply that Graham is cute.
Someone who is not harsh is always large. | Coleman is large. | entailment |
Mila is not cautious.
Graham is not large.
Mila is reserved.
Coleman is not informal.
Mila is not informal.
Chapman is cautious.
Brian is not cautious.
Ramsey is not large.
Melody is not harsh.
Graham is not reserved.
Brian is harsh.
Graham is not harsh.Someone is not informal if and only if he is not harsh.
If there is someone who is harsh, then Graham is not large.
If someone is cautious and informal, then he is both cute and reserved, and vice versa.
If Brian is cute, then Mila is reserved, and vice versa.
If someone is reserved, then he is both large and cute.
If someone is large, then he is not cautious.
Someone is harsh if and only if he is cautious.
Someone who is eithor cute or not reserved is always large.
If there is someone who is either cute or reserved, then Melody is not cautious.
If there is someone who is reserved, then Brian is cute.
Brian being not harsh and Brian being not cautious imply that Graham is cute.
Someone who is not harsh is always large. | Mila is not cute. | contradiction |
Mila is not cautious.
Graham is not large.
Mila is reserved.
Coleman is not informal.
Mila is not informal.
Chapman is cautious.
Brian is not cautious.
Ramsey is not large.
Melody is not harsh.
Graham is not reserved.
Brian is harsh.
Graham is not harsh.Someone is not informal if and only if he is not harsh.
If there is someone who is harsh, then Graham is not large.
If someone is cautious and informal, then he is both cute and reserved, and vice versa.
If Brian is cute, then Mila is reserved, and vice versa.
If someone is reserved, then he is both large and cute.
If someone is large, then he is not cautious.
Someone is harsh if and only if he is cautious.
Someone who is eithor cute or not reserved is always large.
If there is someone who is either cute or reserved, then Melody is not cautious.
If there is someone who is reserved, then Brian is cute.
Brian being not harsh and Brian being not cautious imply that Graham is cute.
Someone who is not harsh is always large. | Graham is not large. | self_contradiction |
Arlen is not breakable.
Lauren is not breakable.
Lucille is not additional.
Lucille is not self-disciplined.
Stefan is friendly.
Ethan is not additional.
Stefan is triangular.
Chalmers is not pink.
Chalmers is not triangular.
Lucille is pink.
Lauren is triangular.
Arlen is self-disciplined.All not breakable people are pink.
Chalmers being pink or Lauren being additional implies that Arlen is not triangular.
If all people are pink, then Lucille is triangular and Lucille is additional.
If there is at least one people who is both not friendly and not triangular, then Stefan is not breakable.
If someone is either not triangular or not breakable, then he is additional and not friendly.
If there is at least one people who is friendly, then Camille is not breakable.
If someone is pink, then he is both friendly and triangular.
Arlen is breakable if and only if Stefan is not pink and Arlen is additional.
If there is someone who is additional, then Camille is friendly and Chalmers is not triangular.
Ethan being triangular implies that Ethan is not additional.
It can be concluded that Chalmers is not friendly once knowing that Ethan is breakable.
Lauren is not triangular if and only if Chalmers is not self-disciplined. | Ethan is not additional. | entailment |
Arlen is not breakable.
Lauren is not breakable.
Lucille is not additional.
Lucille is not self-disciplined.
Stefan is friendly.
Ethan is not additional.
Stefan is triangular.
Chalmers is not pink.
Chalmers is not triangular.
Lucille is pink.
Lauren is triangular.
Arlen is self-disciplined.All not breakable people are pink.
Chalmers being pink or Lauren being additional implies that Arlen is not triangular.
If all people are pink, then Lucille is triangular and Lucille is additional.
If there is at least one people who is both not friendly and not triangular, then Stefan is not breakable.
If someone is either not triangular or not breakable, then he is additional and not friendly.
If there is at least one people who is friendly, then Camille is not breakable.
If someone is pink, then he is both friendly and triangular.
Arlen is breakable if and only if Stefan is not pink and Arlen is additional.
If there is someone who is additional, then Camille is friendly and Chalmers is not triangular.
Ethan being triangular implies that Ethan is not additional.
It can be concluded that Chalmers is not friendly once knowing that Ethan is breakable.
Lauren is not triangular if and only if Chalmers is not self-disciplined. | Lucille is not additional. | entailment |
Arlen is not breakable.
Lauren is not breakable.
Lucille is not additional.
Lucille is not self-disciplined.
Stefan is friendly.
Ethan is not additional.
Stefan is triangular.
Chalmers is not pink.
Chalmers is not triangular.
Lucille is pink.
Lauren is triangular.
Arlen is self-disciplined.All not breakable people are pink.
Chalmers being pink or Lauren being additional implies that Arlen is not triangular.
If all people are pink, then Lucille is triangular and Lucille is additional.
If there is at least one people who is both not friendly and not triangular, then Stefan is not breakable.
If someone is either not triangular or not breakable, then he is additional and not friendly.
If there is at least one people who is friendly, then Camille is not breakable.
If someone is pink, then he is both friendly and triangular.
Arlen is breakable if and only if Stefan is not pink and Arlen is additional.
If there is someone who is additional, then Camille is friendly and Chalmers is not triangular.
Ethan being triangular implies that Ethan is not additional.
It can be concluded that Chalmers is not friendly once knowing that Ethan is breakable.
Lauren is not triangular if and only if Chalmers is not self-disciplined. | Arlen is not friendly. | self_contradiction |
Arlen is not breakable.
Lauren is not breakable.
Lucille is not additional.
Lucille is not self-disciplined.
Stefan is friendly.
Ethan is not additional.
Stefan is triangular.
Chalmers is not pink.
Chalmers is not triangular.
Lucille is pink.
Lauren is triangular.
Arlen is self-disciplined.All not breakable people are pink.
Chalmers being pink or Lauren being additional implies that Arlen is not triangular.
If all people are pink, then Lucille is triangular and Lucille is additional.
If there is at least one people who is both not friendly and not triangular, then Stefan is not breakable.
If someone is either not triangular or not breakable, then he is additional and not friendly.
If there is at least one people who is friendly, then Camille is not breakable.
If someone is pink, then he is both friendly and triangular.
Arlen is breakable if and only if Stefan is not pink and Arlen is additional.
If there is someone who is additional, then Camille is friendly and Chalmers is not triangular.
Ethan being triangular implies that Ethan is not additional.
It can be concluded that Chalmers is not friendly once knowing that Ethan is breakable.
Lauren is not triangular if and only if Chalmers is not self-disciplined. | Camille is not friendly. | self_contradiction |
Arlen is not breakable.
Lauren is not breakable.
Lucille is not additional.
Lucille is not self-disciplined.
Stefan is friendly.
Ethan is not additional.
Stefan is triangular.
Chalmers is not pink.
Chalmers is not triangular.
Lucille is pink.
Lauren is triangular.
Arlen is self-disciplined.All not breakable people are pink.
Chalmers being pink or Lauren being additional implies that Arlen is not triangular.
If all people are pink, then Lucille is triangular and Lucille is additional.
If there is at least one people who is both not friendly and not triangular, then Stefan is not breakable.
If someone is either not triangular or not breakable, then he is additional and not friendly.
If there is at least one people who is friendly, then Camille is not breakable.
If someone is pink, then he is both friendly and triangular.
Arlen is breakable if and only if Stefan is not pink and Arlen is additional.
If there is someone who is additional, then Camille is friendly and Chalmers is not triangular.
Ethan being triangular implies that Ethan is not additional.
It can be concluded that Chalmers is not friendly once knowing that Ethan is breakable.
Lauren is not triangular if and only if Chalmers is not self-disciplined. | Arlen is additional. | entailment |
Arlen is not breakable.
Lauren is not breakable.
Lucille is not additional.
Lucille is not self-disciplined.
Stefan is friendly.
Ethan is not additional.
Stefan is triangular.
Chalmers is not pink.
Chalmers is not triangular.
Lucille is pink.
Lauren is triangular.
Arlen is self-disciplined.All not breakable people are pink.
Chalmers being pink or Lauren being additional implies that Arlen is not triangular.
If all people are pink, then Lucille is triangular and Lucille is additional.
If there is at least one people who is both not friendly and not triangular, then Stefan is not breakable.
If someone is either not triangular or not breakable, then he is additional and not friendly.
If there is at least one people who is friendly, then Camille is not breakable.
If someone is pink, then he is both friendly and triangular.
Arlen is breakable if and only if Stefan is not pink and Arlen is additional.
If there is someone who is additional, then Camille is friendly and Chalmers is not triangular.
Ethan being triangular implies that Ethan is not additional.
It can be concluded that Chalmers is not friendly once knowing that Ethan is breakable.
Lauren is not triangular if and only if Chalmers is not self-disciplined. | Lauren is not friendly. | self_contradiction |
Arlen is not breakable.
Lauren is not breakable.
Lucille is not additional.
Lucille is not self-disciplined.
Stefan is friendly.
Ethan is not additional.
Stefan is triangular.
Chalmers is not pink.
Chalmers is not triangular.
Lucille is pink.
Lauren is triangular.
Arlen is self-disciplined.All not breakable people are pink.
Chalmers being pink or Lauren being additional implies that Arlen is not triangular.
If all people are pink, then Lucille is triangular and Lucille is additional.
If there is at least one people who is both not friendly and not triangular, then Stefan is not breakable.
If someone is either not triangular or not breakable, then he is additional and not friendly.
If there is at least one people who is friendly, then Camille is not breakable.
If someone is pink, then he is both friendly and triangular.
Arlen is breakable if and only if Stefan is not pink and Arlen is additional.
If there is someone who is additional, then Camille is friendly and Chalmers is not triangular.
Ethan being triangular implies that Ethan is not additional.
It can be concluded that Chalmers is not friendly once knowing that Ethan is breakable.
Lauren is not triangular if and only if Chalmers is not self-disciplined. | Stefan is not pink. | contradiction |
Arlen is not breakable.
Lauren is not breakable.
Lucille is not additional.
Lucille is not self-disciplined.
Stefan is friendly.
Ethan is not additional.
Stefan is triangular.
Chalmers is not pink.
Chalmers is not triangular.
Lucille is pink.
Lauren is triangular.
Arlen is self-disciplined.All not breakable people are pink.
Chalmers being pink or Lauren being additional implies that Arlen is not triangular.
If all people are pink, then Lucille is triangular and Lucille is additional.
If there is at least one people who is both not friendly and not triangular, then Stefan is not breakable.
If someone is either not triangular or not breakable, then he is additional and not friendly.
If there is at least one people who is friendly, then Camille is not breakable.
If someone is pink, then he is both friendly and triangular.
Arlen is breakable if and only if Stefan is not pink and Arlen is additional.
If there is someone who is additional, then Camille is friendly and Chalmers is not triangular.
Ethan being triangular implies that Ethan is not additional.
It can be concluded that Chalmers is not friendly once knowing that Ethan is breakable.
Lauren is not triangular if and only if Chalmers is not self-disciplined. | Stefan is not breakable. | entailment |
Arlen is not breakable.
Lauren is not breakable.
Lucille is not additional.
Lucille is not self-disciplined.
Stefan is friendly.
Ethan is not additional.
Stefan is triangular.
Chalmers is not pink.
Chalmers is not triangular.
Lucille is pink.
Lauren is triangular.
Arlen is self-disciplined.All not breakable people are pink.
Chalmers being pink or Lauren being additional implies that Arlen is not triangular.
If all people are pink, then Lucille is triangular and Lucille is additional.
If there is at least one people who is both not friendly and not triangular, then Stefan is not breakable.
If someone is either not triangular or not breakable, then he is additional and not friendly.
If there is at least one people who is friendly, then Camille is not breakable.
If someone is pink, then he is both friendly and triangular.
Arlen is breakable if and only if Stefan is not pink and Arlen is additional.
If there is someone who is additional, then Camille is friendly and Chalmers is not triangular.
Ethan being triangular implies that Ethan is not additional.
It can be concluded that Chalmers is not friendly once knowing that Ethan is breakable.
Lauren is not triangular if and only if Chalmers is not self-disciplined. | Arlen is self-disciplined. | entailment |
Arlen is not breakable.
Lauren is not breakable.
Lucille is not additional.
Lucille is not self-disciplined.
Stefan is friendly.
Ethan is not additional.
Stefan is triangular.
Chalmers is not pink.
Chalmers is not triangular.
Lucille is pink.
Lauren is triangular.
Arlen is self-disciplined.All not breakable people are pink.
Chalmers being pink or Lauren being additional implies that Arlen is not triangular.
If all people are pink, then Lucille is triangular and Lucille is additional.
If there is at least one people who is both not friendly and not triangular, then Stefan is not breakable.
If someone is either not triangular or not breakable, then he is additional and not friendly.
If there is at least one people who is friendly, then Camille is not breakable.
If someone is pink, then he is both friendly and triangular.
Arlen is breakable if and only if Stefan is not pink and Arlen is additional.
If there is someone who is additional, then Camille is friendly and Chalmers is not triangular.
Ethan being triangular implies that Ethan is not additional.
It can be concluded that Chalmers is not friendly once knowing that Ethan is breakable.
Lauren is not triangular if and only if Chalmers is not self-disciplined. | Ethan is not friendly. | neutral |
Arlen is not breakable.
Lauren is not breakable.
Lucille is not additional.
Lucille is not self-disciplined.
Stefan is friendly.
Ethan is not additional.
Stefan is triangular.
Chalmers is not pink.
Chalmers is not triangular.
Lucille is pink.
Lauren is triangular.
Arlen is self-disciplined.All not breakable people are pink.
Chalmers being pink or Lauren being additional implies that Arlen is not triangular.
If all people are pink, then Lucille is triangular and Lucille is additional.
If there is at least one people who is both not friendly and not triangular, then Stefan is not breakable.
If someone is either not triangular or not breakable, then he is additional and not friendly.
If there is at least one people who is friendly, then Camille is not breakable.
If someone is pink, then he is both friendly and triangular.
Arlen is breakable if and only if Stefan is not pink and Arlen is additional.
If there is someone who is additional, then Camille is friendly and Chalmers is not triangular.
Ethan being triangular implies that Ethan is not additional.
It can be concluded that Chalmers is not friendly once knowing that Ethan is breakable.
Lauren is not triangular if and only if Chalmers is not self-disciplined. | Lucille is not pink. | contradiction |
Arlen is not breakable.
Lauren is not breakable.
Lucille is not additional.
Lucille is not self-disciplined.
Stefan is friendly.
Ethan is not additional.
Stefan is triangular.
Chalmers is not pink.
Chalmers is not triangular.
Lucille is pink.
Lauren is triangular.
Arlen is self-disciplined.All not breakable people are pink.
Chalmers being pink or Lauren being additional implies that Arlen is not triangular.
If all people are pink, then Lucille is triangular and Lucille is additional.
If there is at least one people who is both not friendly and not triangular, then Stefan is not breakable.
If someone is either not triangular or not breakable, then he is additional and not friendly.
If there is at least one people who is friendly, then Camille is not breakable.
If someone is pink, then he is both friendly and triangular.
Arlen is breakable if and only if Stefan is not pink and Arlen is additional.
If there is someone who is additional, then Camille is friendly and Chalmers is not triangular.
Ethan being triangular implies that Ethan is not additional.
It can be concluded that Chalmers is not friendly once knowing that Ethan is breakable.
Lauren is not triangular if and only if Chalmers is not self-disciplined. | Lucille is not triangular. | contradiction |
Arlen is not breakable.
Lauren is not breakable.
Lucille is not additional.
Lucille is not self-disciplined.
Stefan is friendly.
Ethan is not additional.
Stefan is triangular.
Chalmers is not pink.
Chalmers is not triangular.
Lucille is pink.
Lauren is triangular.
Arlen is self-disciplined.All not breakable people are pink.
Chalmers being pink or Lauren being additional implies that Arlen is not triangular.
If all people are pink, then Lucille is triangular and Lucille is additional.
If there is at least one people who is both not friendly and not triangular, then Stefan is not breakable.
If someone is either not triangular or not breakable, then he is additional and not friendly.
If there is at least one people who is friendly, then Camille is not breakable.
If someone is pink, then he is both friendly and triangular.
Arlen is breakable if and only if Stefan is not pink and Arlen is additional.
If there is someone who is additional, then Camille is friendly and Chalmers is not triangular.
Ethan being triangular implies that Ethan is not additional.
It can be concluded that Chalmers is not friendly once knowing that Ethan is breakable.
Lauren is not triangular if and only if Chalmers is not self-disciplined. | Arlen is not pink. | contradiction |
Arlen is not breakable.
Lauren is not breakable.
Lucille is not additional.
Lucille is not self-disciplined.
Stefan is friendly.
Ethan is not additional.
Stefan is triangular.
Chalmers is not pink.
Chalmers is not triangular.
Lucille is pink.
Lauren is triangular.
Arlen is self-disciplined.All not breakable people are pink.
Chalmers being pink or Lauren being additional implies that Arlen is not triangular.
If all people are pink, then Lucille is triangular and Lucille is additional.
If there is at least one people who is both not friendly and not triangular, then Stefan is not breakable.
If someone is either not triangular or not breakable, then he is additional and not friendly.
If there is at least one people who is friendly, then Camille is not breakable.
If someone is pink, then he is both friendly and triangular.
Arlen is breakable if and only if Stefan is not pink and Arlen is additional.
If there is someone who is additional, then Camille is friendly and Chalmers is not triangular.
Ethan being triangular implies that Ethan is not additional.
It can be concluded that Chalmers is not friendly once knowing that Ethan is breakable.
Lauren is not triangular if and only if Chalmers is not self-disciplined. | Ethan is not pink. | neutral |
Arlen is not breakable.
Lauren is not breakable.
Lucille is not additional.
Lucille is not self-disciplined.
Stefan is friendly.
Ethan is not additional.
Stefan is triangular.
Chalmers is not pink.
Chalmers is not triangular.
Lucille is pink.
Lauren is triangular.
Arlen is self-disciplined.All not breakable people are pink.
Chalmers being pink or Lauren being additional implies that Arlen is not triangular.
If all people are pink, then Lucille is triangular and Lucille is additional.
If there is at least one people who is both not friendly and not triangular, then Stefan is not breakable.
If someone is either not triangular or not breakable, then he is additional and not friendly.
If there is at least one people who is friendly, then Camille is not breakable.
If someone is pink, then he is both friendly and triangular.
Arlen is breakable if and only if Stefan is not pink and Arlen is additional.
If there is someone who is additional, then Camille is friendly and Chalmers is not triangular.
Ethan being triangular implies that Ethan is not additional.
It can be concluded that Chalmers is not friendly once knowing that Ethan is breakable.
Lauren is not triangular if and only if Chalmers is not self-disciplined. | Camille is friendly. | self_contradiction |
Arlen is not breakable.
Lauren is not breakable.
Lucille is not additional.
Lucille is not self-disciplined.
Stefan is friendly.
Ethan is not additional.
Stefan is triangular.
Chalmers is not pink.
Chalmers is not triangular.
Lucille is pink.
Lauren is triangular.
Arlen is self-disciplined.All not breakable people are pink.
Chalmers being pink or Lauren being additional implies that Arlen is not triangular.
If all people are pink, then Lucille is triangular and Lucille is additional.
If there is at least one people who is both not friendly and not triangular, then Stefan is not breakable.
If someone is either not triangular or not breakable, then he is additional and not friendly.
If there is at least one people who is friendly, then Camille is not breakable.
If someone is pink, then he is both friendly and triangular.
Arlen is breakable if and only if Stefan is not pink and Arlen is additional.
If there is someone who is additional, then Camille is friendly and Chalmers is not triangular.
Ethan being triangular implies that Ethan is not additional.
It can be concluded that Chalmers is not friendly once knowing that Ethan is breakable.
Lauren is not triangular if and only if Chalmers is not self-disciplined. | Ethan is triangular. | neutral |
Arlen is not breakable.
Lauren is not breakable.
Lucille is not additional.
Lucille is not self-disciplined.
Stefan is friendly.
Ethan is not additional.
Stefan is triangular.
Chalmers is not pink.
Chalmers is not triangular.
Lucille is pink.
Lauren is triangular.
Arlen is self-disciplined.All not breakable people are pink.
Chalmers being pink or Lauren being additional implies that Arlen is not triangular.
If all people are pink, then Lucille is triangular and Lucille is additional.
If there is at least one people who is both not friendly and not triangular, then Stefan is not breakable.
If someone is either not triangular or not breakable, then he is additional and not friendly.
If there is at least one people who is friendly, then Camille is not breakable.
If someone is pink, then he is both friendly and triangular.
Arlen is breakable if and only if Stefan is not pink and Arlen is additional.
If there is someone who is additional, then Camille is friendly and Chalmers is not triangular.
Ethan being triangular implies that Ethan is not additional.
It can be concluded that Chalmers is not friendly once knowing that Ethan is breakable.
Lauren is not triangular if and only if Chalmers is not self-disciplined. | Stefan is friendly. | self_contradiction |
Arlen is not breakable.
Lauren is not breakable.
Lucille is not additional.
Lucille is not self-disciplined.
Stefan is friendly.
Ethan is not additional.
Stefan is triangular.
Chalmers is not pink.
Chalmers is not triangular.
Lucille is pink.
Lauren is triangular.
Arlen is self-disciplined.All not breakable people are pink.
Chalmers being pink or Lauren being additional implies that Arlen is not triangular.
If all people are pink, then Lucille is triangular and Lucille is additional.
If there is at least one people who is both not friendly and not triangular, then Stefan is not breakable.
If someone is either not triangular or not breakable, then he is additional and not friendly.
If there is at least one people who is friendly, then Camille is not breakable.
If someone is pink, then he is both friendly and triangular.
Arlen is breakable if and only if Stefan is not pink and Arlen is additional.
If there is someone who is additional, then Camille is friendly and Chalmers is not triangular.
Ethan being triangular implies that Ethan is not additional.
It can be concluded that Chalmers is not friendly once knowing that Ethan is breakable.
Lauren is not triangular if and only if Chalmers is not self-disciplined. | Lucille is breakable. | neutral |
Arlen is not breakable.
Lauren is not breakable.
Lucille is not additional.
Lucille is not self-disciplined.
Stefan is friendly.
Ethan is not additional.
Stefan is triangular.
Chalmers is not pink.
Chalmers is not triangular.
Lucille is pink.
Lauren is triangular.
Arlen is self-disciplined.All not breakable people are pink.
Chalmers being pink or Lauren being additional implies that Arlen is not triangular.
If all people are pink, then Lucille is triangular and Lucille is additional.
If there is at least one people who is both not friendly and not triangular, then Stefan is not breakable.
If someone is either not triangular or not breakable, then he is additional and not friendly.
If there is at least one people who is friendly, then Camille is not breakable.
If someone is pink, then he is both friendly and triangular.
Arlen is breakable if and only if Stefan is not pink and Arlen is additional.
If there is someone who is additional, then Camille is friendly and Chalmers is not triangular.
Ethan being triangular implies that Ethan is not additional.
It can be concluded that Chalmers is not friendly once knowing that Ethan is breakable.
Lauren is not triangular if and only if Chalmers is not self-disciplined. | Camille is not triangular. | contradiction |
Arlen is not breakable.
Lauren is not breakable.
Lucille is not additional.
Lucille is not self-disciplined.
Stefan is friendly.
Ethan is not additional.
Stefan is triangular.
Chalmers is not pink.
Chalmers is not triangular.
Lucille is pink.
Lauren is triangular.
Arlen is self-disciplined.All not breakable people are pink.
Chalmers being pink or Lauren being additional implies that Arlen is not triangular.
If all people are pink, then Lucille is triangular and Lucille is additional.
If there is at least one people who is both not friendly and not triangular, then Stefan is not breakable.
If someone is either not triangular or not breakable, then he is additional and not friendly.
If there is at least one people who is friendly, then Camille is not breakable.
If someone is pink, then he is both friendly and triangular.
Arlen is breakable if and only if Stefan is not pink and Arlen is additional.
If there is someone who is additional, then Camille is friendly and Chalmers is not triangular.
Ethan being triangular implies that Ethan is not additional.
It can be concluded that Chalmers is not friendly once knowing that Ethan is breakable.
Lauren is not triangular if and only if Chalmers is not self-disciplined. | Stefan is not self-disciplined. | neutral |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.