premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Baldwin is wooden.
Abner is not creepy.
Hamlin is not wooden.
Baldwin is not pleasant.
Hamlin is not various.
Ted is not repulsive.
Hamlin is foolish.
Abner is not various.
Abner is pleasant.
Ted is not pleasant.
Hamlin is not repulsive.
Baldwin is creepy.Someone being not foolish is equivalent to being creepy.
If Baldwin is creepy and Abner is pleasant, then Silvia is various.
If someone is not creepy or foolish, then he is wooden.
If there is someone who is either not wooden or creepy, then Peter is not pleasant.
If there is someone who is creepy, then Silvia is not pleasant.
Hamlin being repulsive is equivalent to Peter being creepy and Hamlin being foolish.
If there is someone who is creepy, then Alston is not wooden and Alston is not pleasant.
Someone is various if and only if he is not foolish.
If all people are not various or not repulsive, then Ted is not wooden.
If there is at least one people who is both not foolish and not wooden, then Abner is not pleasant.
Someone who is eithor not creepy or not foolish is always pleasant.
If someone is not pleasant, then he is not repulsive. | Hamlin is various. | contradiction |
Baldwin is wooden.
Abner is not creepy.
Hamlin is not wooden.
Baldwin is not pleasant.
Hamlin is not various.
Ted is not repulsive.
Hamlin is foolish.
Abner is not various.
Abner is pleasant.
Ted is not pleasant.
Hamlin is not repulsive.
Baldwin is creepy.Someone being not foolish is equivalent to being creepy.
If Baldwin is creepy and Abner is pleasant, then Silvia is various.
If someone is not creepy or foolish, then he is wooden.
If there is someone who is either not wooden or creepy, then Peter is not pleasant.
If there is someone who is creepy, then Silvia is not pleasant.
Hamlin being repulsive is equivalent to Peter being creepy and Hamlin being foolish.
If there is someone who is creepy, then Alston is not wooden and Alston is not pleasant.
Someone is various if and only if he is not foolish.
If all people are not various or not repulsive, then Ted is not wooden.
If there is at least one people who is both not foolish and not wooden, then Abner is not pleasant.
Someone who is eithor not creepy or not foolish is always pleasant.
If someone is not pleasant, then he is not repulsive. | Abner is not pleasant. | self_contradiction |
Baldwin is wooden.
Abner is not creepy.
Hamlin is not wooden.
Baldwin is not pleasant.
Hamlin is not various.
Ted is not repulsive.
Hamlin is foolish.
Abner is not various.
Abner is pleasant.
Ted is not pleasant.
Hamlin is not repulsive.
Baldwin is creepy.Someone being not foolish is equivalent to being creepy.
If Baldwin is creepy and Abner is pleasant, then Silvia is various.
If someone is not creepy or foolish, then he is wooden.
If there is someone who is either not wooden or creepy, then Peter is not pleasant.
If there is someone who is creepy, then Silvia is not pleasant.
Hamlin being repulsive is equivalent to Peter being creepy and Hamlin being foolish.
If there is someone who is creepy, then Alston is not wooden and Alston is not pleasant.
Someone is various if and only if he is not foolish.
If all people are not various or not repulsive, then Ted is not wooden.
If there is at least one people who is both not foolish and not wooden, then Abner is not pleasant.
Someone who is eithor not creepy or not foolish is always pleasant.
If someone is not pleasant, then he is not repulsive. | Baldwin is creepy. | entailment |
Baldwin is wooden.
Abner is not creepy.
Hamlin is not wooden.
Baldwin is not pleasant.
Hamlin is not various.
Ted is not repulsive.
Hamlin is foolish.
Abner is not various.
Abner is pleasant.
Ted is not pleasant.
Hamlin is not repulsive.
Baldwin is creepy.Someone being not foolish is equivalent to being creepy.
If Baldwin is creepy and Abner is pleasant, then Silvia is various.
If someone is not creepy or foolish, then he is wooden.
If there is someone who is either not wooden or creepy, then Peter is not pleasant.
If there is someone who is creepy, then Silvia is not pleasant.
Hamlin being repulsive is equivalent to Peter being creepy and Hamlin being foolish.
If there is someone who is creepy, then Alston is not wooden and Alston is not pleasant.
Someone is various if and only if he is not foolish.
If all people are not various or not repulsive, then Ted is not wooden.
If there is at least one people who is both not foolish and not wooden, then Abner is not pleasant.
Someone who is eithor not creepy or not foolish is always pleasant.
If someone is not pleasant, then he is not repulsive. | Abner is creepy. | contradiction |
Baldwin is wooden.
Abner is not creepy.
Hamlin is not wooden.
Baldwin is not pleasant.
Hamlin is not various.
Ted is not repulsive.
Hamlin is foolish.
Abner is not various.
Abner is pleasant.
Ted is not pleasant.
Hamlin is not repulsive.
Baldwin is creepy.Someone being not foolish is equivalent to being creepy.
If Baldwin is creepy and Abner is pleasant, then Silvia is various.
If someone is not creepy or foolish, then he is wooden.
If there is someone who is either not wooden or creepy, then Peter is not pleasant.
If there is someone who is creepy, then Silvia is not pleasant.
Hamlin being repulsive is equivalent to Peter being creepy and Hamlin being foolish.
If there is someone who is creepy, then Alston is not wooden and Alston is not pleasant.
Someone is various if and only if he is not foolish.
If all people are not various or not repulsive, then Ted is not wooden.
If there is at least one people who is both not foolish and not wooden, then Abner is not pleasant.
Someone who is eithor not creepy or not foolish is always pleasant.
If someone is not pleasant, then he is not repulsive. | Hamlin is wooden. | self_contradiction |
Baldwin is wooden.
Abner is not creepy.
Hamlin is not wooden.
Baldwin is not pleasant.
Hamlin is not various.
Ted is not repulsive.
Hamlin is foolish.
Abner is not various.
Abner is pleasant.
Ted is not pleasant.
Hamlin is not repulsive.
Baldwin is creepy.Someone being not foolish is equivalent to being creepy.
If Baldwin is creepy and Abner is pleasant, then Silvia is various.
If someone is not creepy or foolish, then he is wooden.
If there is someone who is either not wooden or creepy, then Peter is not pleasant.
If there is someone who is creepy, then Silvia is not pleasant.
Hamlin being repulsive is equivalent to Peter being creepy and Hamlin being foolish.
If there is someone who is creepy, then Alston is not wooden and Alston is not pleasant.
Someone is various if and only if he is not foolish.
If all people are not various or not repulsive, then Ted is not wooden.
If there is at least one people who is both not foolish and not wooden, then Abner is not pleasant.
Someone who is eithor not creepy or not foolish is always pleasant.
If someone is not pleasant, then he is not repulsive. | Silvia is pleasant. | self_contradiction |
Baldwin is wooden.
Abner is not creepy.
Hamlin is not wooden.
Baldwin is not pleasant.
Hamlin is not various.
Ted is not repulsive.
Hamlin is foolish.
Abner is not various.
Abner is pleasant.
Ted is not pleasant.
Hamlin is not repulsive.
Baldwin is creepy.Someone being not foolish is equivalent to being creepy.
If Baldwin is creepy and Abner is pleasant, then Silvia is various.
If someone is not creepy or foolish, then he is wooden.
If there is someone who is either not wooden or creepy, then Peter is not pleasant.
If there is someone who is creepy, then Silvia is not pleasant.
Hamlin being repulsive is equivalent to Peter being creepy and Hamlin being foolish.
If there is someone who is creepy, then Alston is not wooden and Alston is not pleasant.
Someone is various if and only if he is not foolish.
If all people are not various or not repulsive, then Ted is not wooden.
If there is at least one people who is both not foolish and not wooden, then Abner is not pleasant.
Someone who is eithor not creepy or not foolish is always pleasant.
If someone is not pleasant, then he is not repulsive. | Silvia is not pleasant. | self_contradiction |
Baldwin is wooden.
Abner is not creepy.
Hamlin is not wooden.
Baldwin is not pleasant.
Hamlin is not various.
Ted is not repulsive.
Hamlin is foolish.
Abner is not various.
Abner is pleasant.
Ted is not pleasant.
Hamlin is not repulsive.
Baldwin is creepy.Someone being not foolish is equivalent to being creepy.
If Baldwin is creepy and Abner is pleasant, then Silvia is various.
If someone is not creepy or foolish, then he is wooden.
If there is someone who is either not wooden or creepy, then Peter is not pleasant.
If there is someone who is creepy, then Silvia is not pleasant.
Hamlin being repulsive is equivalent to Peter being creepy and Hamlin being foolish.
If there is someone who is creepy, then Alston is not wooden and Alston is not pleasant.
Someone is various if and only if he is not foolish.
If all people are not various or not repulsive, then Ted is not wooden.
If there is at least one people who is both not foolish and not wooden, then Abner is not pleasant.
Someone who is eithor not creepy or not foolish is always pleasant.
If someone is not pleasant, then he is not repulsive. | Silvia is not repulsive. | entailment |
Baldwin is wooden.
Abner is not creepy.
Hamlin is not wooden.
Baldwin is not pleasant.
Hamlin is not various.
Ted is not repulsive.
Hamlin is foolish.
Abner is not various.
Abner is pleasant.
Ted is not pleasant.
Hamlin is not repulsive.
Baldwin is creepy.Someone being not foolish is equivalent to being creepy.
If Baldwin is creepy and Abner is pleasant, then Silvia is various.
If someone is not creepy or foolish, then he is wooden.
If there is someone who is either not wooden or creepy, then Peter is not pleasant.
If there is someone who is creepy, then Silvia is not pleasant.
Hamlin being repulsive is equivalent to Peter being creepy and Hamlin being foolish.
If there is someone who is creepy, then Alston is not wooden and Alston is not pleasant.
Someone is various if and only if he is not foolish.
If all people are not various or not repulsive, then Ted is not wooden.
If there is at least one people who is both not foolish and not wooden, then Abner is not pleasant.
Someone who is eithor not creepy or not foolish is always pleasant.
If someone is not pleasant, then he is not repulsive. | Alston is foolish. | neutral |
Baldwin is wooden.
Abner is not creepy.
Hamlin is not wooden.
Baldwin is not pleasant.
Hamlin is not various.
Ted is not repulsive.
Hamlin is foolish.
Abner is not various.
Abner is pleasant.
Ted is not pleasant.
Hamlin is not repulsive.
Baldwin is creepy.Someone being not foolish is equivalent to being creepy.
If Baldwin is creepy and Abner is pleasant, then Silvia is various.
If someone is not creepy or foolish, then he is wooden.
If there is someone who is either not wooden or creepy, then Peter is not pleasant.
If there is someone who is creepy, then Silvia is not pleasant.
Hamlin being repulsive is equivalent to Peter being creepy and Hamlin being foolish.
If there is someone who is creepy, then Alston is not wooden and Alston is not pleasant.
Someone is various if and only if he is not foolish.
If all people are not various or not repulsive, then Ted is not wooden.
If there is at least one people who is both not foolish and not wooden, then Abner is not pleasant.
Someone who is eithor not creepy or not foolish is always pleasant.
If someone is not pleasant, then he is not repulsive. | Alston is repulsive. | contradiction |
Baldwin is wooden.
Abner is not creepy.
Hamlin is not wooden.
Baldwin is not pleasant.
Hamlin is not various.
Ted is not repulsive.
Hamlin is foolish.
Abner is not various.
Abner is pleasant.
Ted is not pleasant.
Hamlin is not repulsive.
Baldwin is creepy.Someone being not foolish is equivalent to being creepy.
If Baldwin is creepy and Abner is pleasant, then Silvia is various.
If someone is not creepy or foolish, then he is wooden.
If there is someone who is either not wooden or creepy, then Peter is not pleasant.
If there is someone who is creepy, then Silvia is not pleasant.
Hamlin being repulsive is equivalent to Peter being creepy and Hamlin being foolish.
If there is someone who is creepy, then Alston is not wooden and Alston is not pleasant.
Someone is various if and only if he is not foolish.
If all people are not various or not repulsive, then Ted is not wooden.
If there is at least one people who is both not foolish and not wooden, then Abner is not pleasant.
Someone who is eithor not creepy or not foolish is always pleasant.
If someone is not pleasant, then he is not repulsive. | Alston is not various. | neutral |
Baldwin is wooden.
Abner is not creepy.
Hamlin is not wooden.
Baldwin is not pleasant.
Hamlin is not various.
Ted is not repulsive.
Hamlin is foolish.
Abner is not various.
Abner is pleasant.
Ted is not pleasant.
Hamlin is not repulsive.
Baldwin is creepy.Someone being not foolish is equivalent to being creepy.
If Baldwin is creepy and Abner is pleasant, then Silvia is various.
If someone is not creepy or foolish, then he is wooden.
If there is someone who is either not wooden or creepy, then Peter is not pleasant.
If there is someone who is creepy, then Silvia is not pleasant.
Hamlin being repulsive is equivalent to Peter being creepy and Hamlin being foolish.
If there is someone who is creepy, then Alston is not wooden and Alston is not pleasant.
Someone is various if and only if he is not foolish.
If all people are not various or not repulsive, then Ted is not wooden.
If there is at least one people who is both not foolish and not wooden, then Abner is not pleasant.
Someone who is eithor not creepy or not foolish is always pleasant.
If someone is not pleasant, then he is not repulsive. | Alston is wooden. | contradiction |
Baldwin is wooden.
Abner is not creepy.
Hamlin is not wooden.
Baldwin is not pleasant.
Hamlin is not various.
Ted is not repulsive.
Hamlin is foolish.
Abner is not various.
Abner is pleasant.
Ted is not pleasant.
Hamlin is not repulsive.
Baldwin is creepy.Someone being not foolish is equivalent to being creepy.
If Baldwin is creepy and Abner is pleasant, then Silvia is various.
If someone is not creepy or foolish, then he is wooden.
If there is someone who is either not wooden or creepy, then Peter is not pleasant.
If there is someone who is creepy, then Silvia is not pleasant.
Hamlin being repulsive is equivalent to Peter being creepy and Hamlin being foolish.
If there is someone who is creepy, then Alston is not wooden and Alston is not pleasant.
Someone is various if and only if he is not foolish.
If all people are not various or not repulsive, then Ted is not wooden.
If there is at least one people who is both not foolish and not wooden, then Abner is not pleasant.
Someone who is eithor not creepy or not foolish is always pleasant.
If someone is not pleasant, then he is not repulsive. | Abner is pleasant. | self_contradiction |
Baldwin is wooden.
Abner is not creepy.
Hamlin is not wooden.
Baldwin is not pleasant.
Hamlin is not various.
Ted is not repulsive.
Hamlin is foolish.
Abner is not various.
Abner is pleasant.
Ted is not pleasant.
Hamlin is not repulsive.
Baldwin is creepy.Someone being not foolish is equivalent to being creepy.
If Baldwin is creepy and Abner is pleasant, then Silvia is various.
If someone is not creepy or foolish, then he is wooden.
If there is someone who is either not wooden or creepy, then Peter is not pleasant.
If there is someone who is creepy, then Silvia is not pleasant.
Hamlin being repulsive is equivalent to Peter being creepy and Hamlin being foolish.
If there is someone who is creepy, then Alston is not wooden and Alston is not pleasant.
Someone is various if and only if he is not foolish.
If all people are not various or not repulsive, then Ted is not wooden.
If there is at least one people who is both not foolish and not wooden, then Abner is not pleasant.
Someone who is eithor not creepy or not foolish is always pleasant.
If someone is not pleasant, then he is not repulsive. | Baldwin is not foolish. | entailment |
Baldwin is wooden.
Abner is not creepy.
Hamlin is not wooden.
Baldwin is not pleasant.
Hamlin is not various.
Ted is not repulsive.
Hamlin is foolish.
Abner is not various.
Abner is pleasant.
Ted is not pleasant.
Hamlin is not repulsive.
Baldwin is creepy.Someone being not foolish is equivalent to being creepy.
If Baldwin is creepy and Abner is pleasant, then Silvia is various.
If someone is not creepy or foolish, then he is wooden.
If there is someone who is either not wooden or creepy, then Peter is not pleasant.
If there is someone who is creepy, then Silvia is not pleasant.
Hamlin being repulsive is equivalent to Peter being creepy and Hamlin being foolish.
If there is someone who is creepy, then Alston is not wooden and Alston is not pleasant.
Someone is various if and only if he is not foolish.
If all people are not various or not repulsive, then Ted is not wooden.
If there is at least one people who is both not foolish and not wooden, then Abner is not pleasant.
Someone who is eithor not creepy or not foolish is always pleasant.
If someone is not pleasant, then he is not repulsive. | Silvia is not foolish. | entailment |
Baldwin is wooden.
Abner is not creepy.
Hamlin is not wooden.
Baldwin is not pleasant.
Hamlin is not various.
Ted is not repulsive.
Hamlin is foolish.
Abner is not various.
Abner is pleasant.
Ted is not pleasant.
Hamlin is not repulsive.
Baldwin is creepy.Someone being not foolish is equivalent to being creepy.
If Baldwin is creepy and Abner is pleasant, then Silvia is various.
If someone is not creepy or foolish, then he is wooden.
If there is someone who is either not wooden or creepy, then Peter is not pleasant.
If there is someone who is creepy, then Silvia is not pleasant.
Hamlin being repulsive is equivalent to Peter being creepy and Hamlin being foolish.
If there is someone who is creepy, then Alston is not wooden and Alston is not pleasant.
Someone is various if and only if he is not foolish.
If all people are not various or not repulsive, then Ted is not wooden.
If there is at least one people who is both not foolish and not wooden, then Abner is not pleasant.
Someone who is eithor not creepy or not foolish is always pleasant.
If someone is not pleasant, then he is not repulsive. | Abner is foolish. | neutral |
Baldwin is wooden.
Abner is not creepy.
Hamlin is not wooden.
Baldwin is not pleasant.
Hamlin is not various.
Ted is not repulsive.
Hamlin is foolish.
Abner is not various.
Abner is pleasant.
Ted is not pleasant.
Hamlin is not repulsive.
Baldwin is creepy.Someone being not foolish is equivalent to being creepy.
If Baldwin is creepy and Abner is pleasant, then Silvia is various.
If someone is not creepy or foolish, then he is wooden.
If there is someone who is either not wooden or creepy, then Peter is not pleasant.
If there is someone who is creepy, then Silvia is not pleasant.
Hamlin being repulsive is equivalent to Peter being creepy and Hamlin being foolish.
If there is someone who is creepy, then Alston is not wooden and Alston is not pleasant.
Someone is various if and only if he is not foolish.
If all people are not various or not repulsive, then Ted is not wooden.
If there is at least one people who is both not foolish and not wooden, then Abner is not pleasant.
Someone who is eithor not creepy or not foolish is always pleasant.
If someone is not pleasant, then he is not repulsive. | Baldwin is various. | entailment |
Baldwin is wooden.
Abner is not creepy.
Hamlin is not wooden.
Baldwin is not pleasant.
Hamlin is not various.
Ted is not repulsive.
Hamlin is foolish.
Abner is not various.
Abner is pleasant.
Ted is not pleasant.
Hamlin is not repulsive.
Baldwin is creepy.Someone being not foolish is equivalent to being creepy.
If Baldwin is creepy and Abner is pleasant, then Silvia is various.
If someone is not creepy or foolish, then he is wooden.
If there is someone who is either not wooden or creepy, then Peter is not pleasant.
If there is someone who is creepy, then Silvia is not pleasant.
Hamlin being repulsive is equivalent to Peter being creepy and Hamlin being foolish.
If there is someone who is creepy, then Alston is not wooden and Alston is not pleasant.
Someone is various if and only if he is not foolish.
If all people are not various or not repulsive, then Ted is not wooden.
If there is at least one people who is both not foolish and not wooden, then Abner is not pleasant.
Someone who is eithor not creepy or not foolish is always pleasant.
If someone is not pleasant, then he is not repulsive. | Peter is not creepy. | neutral |
Baldwin is wooden.
Abner is not creepy.
Hamlin is not wooden.
Baldwin is not pleasant.
Hamlin is not various.
Ted is not repulsive.
Hamlin is foolish.
Abner is not various.
Abner is pleasant.
Ted is not pleasant.
Hamlin is not repulsive.
Baldwin is creepy.Someone being not foolish is equivalent to being creepy.
If Baldwin is creepy and Abner is pleasant, then Silvia is various.
If someone is not creepy or foolish, then he is wooden.
If there is someone who is either not wooden or creepy, then Peter is not pleasant.
If there is someone who is creepy, then Silvia is not pleasant.
Hamlin being repulsive is equivalent to Peter being creepy and Hamlin being foolish.
If there is someone who is creepy, then Alston is not wooden and Alston is not pleasant.
Someone is various if and only if he is not foolish.
If all people are not various or not repulsive, then Ted is not wooden.
If there is at least one people who is both not foolish and not wooden, then Abner is not pleasant.
Someone who is eithor not creepy or not foolish is always pleasant.
If someone is not pleasant, then he is not repulsive. | Abner is various. | contradiction |
Baldwin is wooden.
Abner is not creepy.
Hamlin is not wooden.
Baldwin is not pleasant.
Hamlin is not various.
Ted is not repulsive.
Hamlin is foolish.
Abner is not various.
Abner is pleasant.
Ted is not pleasant.
Hamlin is not repulsive.
Baldwin is creepy.Someone being not foolish is equivalent to being creepy.
If Baldwin is creepy and Abner is pleasant, then Silvia is various.
If someone is not creepy or foolish, then he is wooden.
If there is someone who is either not wooden or creepy, then Peter is not pleasant.
If there is someone who is creepy, then Silvia is not pleasant.
Hamlin being repulsive is equivalent to Peter being creepy and Hamlin being foolish.
If there is someone who is creepy, then Alston is not wooden and Alston is not pleasant.
Someone is various if and only if he is not foolish.
If all people are not various or not repulsive, then Ted is not wooden.
If there is at least one people who is both not foolish and not wooden, then Abner is not pleasant.
Someone who is eithor not creepy or not foolish is always pleasant.
If someone is not pleasant, then he is not repulsive. | Alston is various. | neutral |
Hector is sane.
Brice is basic.
Brice is intellectual.
Adrian is not entire.
Adrian is intellectual.
Joe is sane.
Brice is entire.
Garth is not sane.
Joe is entire.
Hector is not entire.
Hector is not aggressive.
Cadman is basic.If someone is not practical or he is not basic, then he is entire.
If there is at least one people who is not aggressive, then Joe is not intellectual and Cadman is not basic.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Lucy is practical.
If there is someone who is both sane and basic, then Adrian is aggressive.
Someone who is eithor not basic or not aggressive is always not sane.
If there is someone who is either practical or not sane, then Brice is not aggressive.
Someone who is intellectual is always both not basic and practical.
Someone who is entire is always practical.
If Lucy is intellectual and Cadman is not sane, then Cadman is not basic.
If someone is either sane or not practical, then he is aggressive and not entire.
Garth being basic implies that Adrian is entire.
If Garth is sane, then Garth is not basic and Joe is not aggressive. | Adrian is not basic. | entailment |
Hector is sane.
Brice is basic.
Brice is intellectual.
Adrian is not entire.
Adrian is intellectual.
Joe is sane.
Brice is entire.
Garth is not sane.
Joe is entire.
Hector is not entire.
Hector is not aggressive.
Cadman is basic.If someone is not practical or he is not basic, then he is entire.
If there is at least one people who is not aggressive, then Joe is not intellectual and Cadman is not basic.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Lucy is practical.
If there is someone who is both sane and basic, then Adrian is aggressive.
Someone who is eithor not basic or not aggressive is always not sane.
If there is someone who is either practical or not sane, then Brice is not aggressive.
Someone who is intellectual is always both not basic and practical.
Someone who is entire is always practical.
If Lucy is intellectual and Cadman is not sane, then Cadman is not basic.
If someone is either sane or not practical, then he is aggressive and not entire.
Garth being basic implies that Adrian is entire.
If Garth is sane, then Garth is not basic and Joe is not aggressive. | Garth is intellectual. | neutral |
Hector is sane.
Brice is basic.
Brice is intellectual.
Adrian is not entire.
Adrian is intellectual.
Joe is sane.
Brice is entire.
Garth is not sane.
Joe is entire.
Hector is not entire.
Hector is not aggressive.
Cadman is basic.If someone is not practical or he is not basic, then he is entire.
If there is at least one people who is not aggressive, then Joe is not intellectual and Cadman is not basic.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Lucy is practical.
If there is someone who is both sane and basic, then Adrian is aggressive.
Someone who is eithor not basic or not aggressive is always not sane.
If there is someone who is either practical or not sane, then Brice is not aggressive.
Someone who is intellectual is always both not basic and practical.
Someone who is entire is always practical.
If Lucy is intellectual and Cadman is not sane, then Cadman is not basic.
If someone is either sane or not practical, then he is aggressive and not entire.
Garth being basic implies that Adrian is entire.
If Garth is sane, then Garth is not basic and Joe is not aggressive. | Brice is not aggressive. | entailment |
Hector is sane.
Brice is basic.
Brice is intellectual.
Adrian is not entire.
Adrian is intellectual.
Joe is sane.
Brice is entire.
Garth is not sane.
Joe is entire.
Hector is not entire.
Hector is not aggressive.
Cadman is basic.If someone is not practical or he is not basic, then he is entire.
If there is at least one people who is not aggressive, then Joe is not intellectual and Cadman is not basic.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Lucy is practical.
If there is someone who is both sane and basic, then Adrian is aggressive.
Someone who is eithor not basic or not aggressive is always not sane.
If there is someone who is either practical or not sane, then Brice is not aggressive.
Someone who is intellectual is always both not basic and practical.
Someone who is entire is always practical.
If Lucy is intellectual and Cadman is not sane, then Cadman is not basic.
If someone is either sane or not practical, then he is aggressive and not entire.
Garth being basic implies that Adrian is entire.
If Garth is sane, then Garth is not basic and Joe is not aggressive. | Hector is sane. | self_contradiction |
Hector is sane.
Brice is basic.
Brice is intellectual.
Adrian is not entire.
Adrian is intellectual.
Joe is sane.
Brice is entire.
Garth is not sane.
Joe is entire.
Hector is not entire.
Hector is not aggressive.
Cadman is basic.If someone is not practical or he is not basic, then he is entire.
If there is at least one people who is not aggressive, then Joe is not intellectual and Cadman is not basic.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Lucy is practical.
If there is someone who is both sane and basic, then Adrian is aggressive.
Someone who is eithor not basic or not aggressive is always not sane.
If there is someone who is either practical or not sane, then Brice is not aggressive.
Someone who is intellectual is always both not basic and practical.
Someone who is entire is always practical.
If Lucy is intellectual and Cadman is not sane, then Cadman is not basic.
If someone is either sane or not practical, then he is aggressive and not entire.
Garth being basic implies that Adrian is entire.
If Garth is sane, then Garth is not basic and Joe is not aggressive. | Brice is not basic. | self_contradiction |
Hector is sane.
Brice is basic.
Brice is intellectual.
Adrian is not entire.
Adrian is intellectual.
Joe is sane.
Brice is entire.
Garth is not sane.
Joe is entire.
Hector is not entire.
Hector is not aggressive.
Cadman is basic.If someone is not practical or he is not basic, then he is entire.
If there is at least one people who is not aggressive, then Joe is not intellectual and Cadman is not basic.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Lucy is practical.
If there is someone who is both sane and basic, then Adrian is aggressive.
Someone who is eithor not basic or not aggressive is always not sane.
If there is someone who is either practical or not sane, then Brice is not aggressive.
Someone who is intellectual is always both not basic and practical.
Someone who is entire is always practical.
If Lucy is intellectual and Cadman is not sane, then Cadman is not basic.
If someone is either sane or not practical, then he is aggressive and not entire.
Garth being basic implies that Adrian is entire.
If Garth is sane, then Garth is not basic and Joe is not aggressive. | Hector is not sane. | self_contradiction |
Hector is sane.
Brice is basic.
Brice is intellectual.
Adrian is not entire.
Adrian is intellectual.
Joe is sane.
Brice is entire.
Garth is not sane.
Joe is entire.
Hector is not entire.
Hector is not aggressive.
Cadman is basic.If someone is not practical or he is not basic, then he is entire.
If there is at least one people who is not aggressive, then Joe is not intellectual and Cadman is not basic.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Lucy is practical.
If there is someone who is both sane and basic, then Adrian is aggressive.
Someone who is eithor not basic or not aggressive is always not sane.
If there is someone who is either practical or not sane, then Brice is not aggressive.
Someone who is intellectual is always both not basic and practical.
Someone who is entire is always practical.
If Lucy is intellectual and Cadman is not sane, then Cadman is not basic.
If someone is either sane or not practical, then he is aggressive and not entire.
Garth being basic implies that Adrian is entire.
If Garth is sane, then Garth is not basic and Joe is not aggressive. | Joe is aggressive. | entailment |
Hector is sane.
Brice is basic.
Brice is intellectual.
Adrian is not entire.
Adrian is intellectual.
Joe is sane.
Brice is entire.
Garth is not sane.
Joe is entire.
Hector is not entire.
Hector is not aggressive.
Cadman is basic.If someone is not practical or he is not basic, then he is entire.
If there is at least one people who is not aggressive, then Joe is not intellectual and Cadman is not basic.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Lucy is practical.
If there is someone who is both sane and basic, then Adrian is aggressive.
Someone who is eithor not basic or not aggressive is always not sane.
If there is someone who is either practical or not sane, then Brice is not aggressive.
Someone who is intellectual is always both not basic and practical.
Someone who is entire is always practical.
If Lucy is intellectual and Cadman is not sane, then Cadman is not basic.
If someone is either sane or not practical, then he is aggressive and not entire.
Garth being basic implies that Adrian is entire.
If Garth is sane, then Garth is not basic and Joe is not aggressive. | Lucy is not aggressive. | neutral |
Hector is sane.
Brice is basic.
Brice is intellectual.
Adrian is not entire.
Adrian is intellectual.
Joe is sane.
Brice is entire.
Garth is not sane.
Joe is entire.
Hector is not entire.
Hector is not aggressive.
Cadman is basic.If someone is not practical or he is not basic, then he is entire.
If there is at least one people who is not aggressive, then Joe is not intellectual and Cadman is not basic.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Lucy is practical.
If there is someone who is both sane and basic, then Adrian is aggressive.
Someone who is eithor not basic or not aggressive is always not sane.
If there is someone who is either practical or not sane, then Brice is not aggressive.
Someone who is intellectual is always both not basic and practical.
Someone who is entire is always practical.
If Lucy is intellectual and Cadman is not sane, then Cadman is not basic.
If someone is either sane or not practical, then he is aggressive and not entire.
Garth being basic implies that Adrian is entire.
If Garth is sane, then Garth is not basic and Joe is not aggressive. | Adrian is not entire. | self_contradiction |
Hector is sane.
Brice is basic.
Brice is intellectual.
Adrian is not entire.
Adrian is intellectual.
Joe is sane.
Brice is entire.
Garth is not sane.
Joe is entire.
Hector is not entire.
Hector is not aggressive.
Cadman is basic.If someone is not practical or he is not basic, then he is entire.
If there is at least one people who is not aggressive, then Joe is not intellectual and Cadman is not basic.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Lucy is practical.
If there is someone who is both sane and basic, then Adrian is aggressive.
Someone who is eithor not basic or not aggressive is always not sane.
If there is someone who is either practical or not sane, then Brice is not aggressive.
Someone who is intellectual is always both not basic and practical.
Someone who is entire is always practical.
If Lucy is intellectual and Cadman is not sane, then Cadman is not basic.
If someone is either sane or not practical, then he is aggressive and not entire.
Garth being basic implies that Adrian is entire.
If Garth is sane, then Garth is not basic and Joe is not aggressive. | Cadman is intellectual. | neutral |
Hector is sane.
Brice is basic.
Brice is intellectual.
Adrian is not entire.
Adrian is intellectual.
Joe is sane.
Brice is entire.
Garth is not sane.
Joe is entire.
Hector is not entire.
Hector is not aggressive.
Cadman is basic.If someone is not practical or he is not basic, then he is entire.
If there is at least one people who is not aggressive, then Joe is not intellectual and Cadman is not basic.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Lucy is practical.
If there is someone who is both sane and basic, then Adrian is aggressive.
Someone who is eithor not basic or not aggressive is always not sane.
If there is someone who is either practical or not sane, then Brice is not aggressive.
Someone who is intellectual is always both not basic and practical.
Someone who is entire is always practical.
If Lucy is intellectual and Cadman is not sane, then Cadman is not basic.
If someone is either sane or not practical, then he is aggressive and not entire.
Garth being basic implies that Adrian is entire.
If Garth is sane, then Garth is not basic and Joe is not aggressive. | Adrian is entire. | self_contradiction |
Hector is sane.
Brice is basic.
Brice is intellectual.
Adrian is not entire.
Adrian is intellectual.
Joe is sane.
Brice is entire.
Garth is not sane.
Joe is entire.
Hector is not entire.
Hector is not aggressive.
Cadman is basic.If someone is not practical or he is not basic, then he is entire.
If there is at least one people who is not aggressive, then Joe is not intellectual and Cadman is not basic.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Lucy is practical.
If there is someone who is both sane and basic, then Adrian is aggressive.
Someone who is eithor not basic or not aggressive is always not sane.
If there is someone who is either practical or not sane, then Brice is not aggressive.
Someone who is intellectual is always both not basic and practical.
Someone who is entire is always practical.
If Lucy is intellectual and Cadman is not sane, then Cadman is not basic.
If someone is either sane or not practical, then he is aggressive and not entire.
Garth being basic implies that Adrian is entire.
If Garth is sane, then Garth is not basic and Joe is not aggressive. | Brice is aggressive. | contradiction |
Hector is sane.
Brice is basic.
Brice is intellectual.
Adrian is not entire.
Adrian is intellectual.
Joe is sane.
Brice is entire.
Garth is not sane.
Joe is entire.
Hector is not entire.
Hector is not aggressive.
Cadman is basic.If someone is not practical or he is not basic, then he is entire.
If there is at least one people who is not aggressive, then Joe is not intellectual and Cadman is not basic.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Lucy is practical.
If there is someone who is both sane and basic, then Adrian is aggressive.
Someone who is eithor not basic or not aggressive is always not sane.
If there is someone who is either practical or not sane, then Brice is not aggressive.
Someone who is intellectual is always both not basic and practical.
Someone who is entire is always practical.
If Lucy is intellectual and Cadman is not sane, then Cadman is not basic.
If someone is either sane or not practical, then he is aggressive and not entire.
Garth being basic implies that Adrian is entire.
If Garth is sane, then Garth is not basic and Joe is not aggressive. | Garth is not intellectual. | neutral |
Hector is sane.
Brice is basic.
Brice is intellectual.
Adrian is not entire.
Adrian is intellectual.
Joe is sane.
Brice is entire.
Garth is not sane.
Joe is entire.
Hector is not entire.
Hector is not aggressive.
Cadman is basic.If someone is not practical or he is not basic, then he is entire.
If there is at least one people who is not aggressive, then Joe is not intellectual and Cadman is not basic.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Lucy is practical.
If there is someone who is both sane and basic, then Adrian is aggressive.
Someone who is eithor not basic or not aggressive is always not sane.
If there is someone who is either practical or not sane, then Brice is not aggressive.
Someone who is intellectual is always both not basic and practical.
Someone who is entire is always practical.
If Lucy is intellectual and Cadman is not sane, then Cadman is not basic.
If someone is either sane or not practical, then he is aggressive and not entire.
Garth being basic implies that Adrian is entire.
If Garth is sane, then Garth is not basic and Joe is not aggressive. | Joe is not aggressive. | contradiction |
Hector is sane.
Brice is basic.
Brice is intellectual.
Adrian is not entire.
Adrian is intellectual.
Joe is sane.
Brice is entire.
Garth is not sane.
Joe is entire.
Hector is not entire.
Hector is not aggressive.
Cadman is basic.If someone is not practical or he is not basic, then he is entire.
If there is at least one people who is not aggressive, then Joe is not intellectual and Cadman is not basic.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Lucy is practical.
If there is someone who is both sane and basic, then Adrian is aggressive.
Someone who is eithor not basic or not aggressive is always not sane.
If there is someone who is either practical or not sane, then Brice is not aggressive.
Someone who is intellectual is always both not basic and practical.
Someone who is entire is always practical.
If Lucy is intellectual and Cadman is not sane, then Cadman is not basic.
If someone is either sane or not practical, then he is aggressive and not entire.
Garth being basic implies that Adrian is entire.
If Garth is sane, then Garth is not basic and Joe is not aggressive. | Brice is not practical. | contradiction |
Hector is sane.
Brice is basic.
Brice is intellectual.
Adrian is not entire.
Adrian is intellectual.
Joe is sane.
Brice is entire.
Garth is not sane.
Joe is entire.
Hector is not entire.
Hector is not aggressive.
Cadman is basic.If someone is not practical or he is not basic, then he is entire.
If there is at least one people who is not aggressive, then Joe is not intellectual and Cadman is not basic.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Lucy is practical.
If there is someone who is both sane and basic, then Adrian is aggressive.
Someone who is eithor not basic or not aggressive is always not sane.
If there is someone who is either practical or not sane, then Brice is not aggressive.
Someone who is intellectual is always both not basic and practical.
Someone who is entire is always practical.
If Lucy is intellectual and Cadman is not sane, then Cadman is not basic.
If someone is either sane or not practical, then he is aggressive and not entire.
Garth being basic implies that Adrian is entire.
If Garth is sane, then Garth is not basic and Joe is not aggressive. | Cadman is sane. | contradiction |
Hector is sane.
Brice is basic.
Brice is intellectual.
Adrian is not entire.
Adrian is intellectual.
Joe is sane.
Brice is entire.
Garth is not sane.
Joe is entire.
Hector is not entire.
Hector is not aggressive.
Cadman is basic.If someone is not practical or he is not basic, then he is entire.
If there is at least one people who is not aggressive, then Joe is not intellectual and Cadman is not basic.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Lucy is practical.
If there is someone who is both sane and basic, then Adrian is aggressive.
Someone who is eithor not basic or not aggressive is always not sane.
If there is someone who is either practical or not sane, then Brice is not aggressive.
Someone who is intellectual is always both not basic and practical.
Someone who is entire is always practical.
If Lucy is intellectual and Cadman is not sane, then Cadman is not basic.
If someone is either sane or not practical, then he is aggressive and not entire.
Garth being basic implies that Adrian is entire.
If Garth is sane, then Garth is not basic and Joe is not aggressive. | Hector is not basic. | neutral |
Hector is sane.
Brice is basic.
Brice is intellectual.
Adrian is not entire.
Adrian is intellectual.
Joe is sane.
Brice is entire.
Garth is not sane.
Joe is entire.
Hector is not entire.
Hector is not aggressive.
Cadman is basic.If someone is not practical or he is not basic, then he is entire.
If there is at least one people who is not aggressive, then Joe is not intellectual and Cadman is not basic.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Lucy is practical.
If there is someone who is both sane and basic, then Adrian is aggressive.
Someone who is eithor not basic or not aggressive is always not sane.
If there is someone who is either practical or not sane, then Brice is not aggressive.
Someone who is intellectual is always both not basic and practical.
Someone who is entire is always practical.
If Lucy is intellectual and Cadman is not sane, then Cadman is not basic.
If someone is either sane or not practical, then he is aggressive and not entire.
Garth being basic implies that Adrian is entire.
If Garth is sane, then Garth is not basic and Joe is not aggressive. | Adrian is sane. | contradiction |
Hector is sane.
Brice is basic.
Brice is intellectual.
Adrian is not entire.
Adrian is intellectual.
Joe is sane.
Brice is entire.
Garth is not sane.
Joe is entire.
Hector is not entire.
Hector is not aggressive.
Cadman is basic.If someone is not practical or he is not basic, then he is entire.
If there is at least one people who is not aggressive, then Joe is not intellectual and Cadman is not basic.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Lucy is practical.
If there is someone who is both sane and basic, then Adrian is aggressive.
Someone who is eithor not basic or not aggressive is always not sane.
If there is someone who is either practical or not sane, then Brice is not aggressive.
Someone who is intellectual is always both not basic and practical.
Someone who is entire is always practical.
If Lucy is intellectual and Cadman is not sane, then Cadman is not basic.
If someone is either sane or not practical, then he is aggressive and not entire.
Garth being basic implies that Adrian is entire.
If Garth is sane, then Garth is not basic and Joe is not aggressive. | Brice is not sane. | entailment |
Hector is sane.
Brice is basic.
Brice is intellectual.
Adrian is not entire.
Adrian is intellectual.
Joe is sane.
Brice is entire.
Garth is not sane.
Joe is entire.
Hector is not entire.
Hector is not aggressive.
Cadman is basic.If someone is not practical or he is not basic, then he is entire.
If there is at least one people who is not aggressive, then Joe is not intellectual and Cadman is not basic.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Lucy is practical.
If there is someone who is both sane and basic, then Adrian is aggressive.
Someone who is eithor not basic or not aggressive is always not sane.
If there is someone who is either practical or not sane, then Brice is not aggressive.
Someone who is intellectual is always both not basic and practical.
Someone who is entire is always practical.
If Lucy is intellectual and Cadman is not sane, then Cadman is not basic.
If someone is either sane or not practical, then he is aggressive and not entire.
Garth being basic implies that Adrian is entire.
If Garth is sane, then Garth is not basic and Joe is not aggressive. | Hector is not entire. | entailment |
Eunice is not bad.
Leonard is not intellectual.
Leonard is not wandering.
Eunice is tender.
Bond is tense.
Bond is intellectual.
Keegan is wandering.
Eunice is intellectual.
Bond is beautiful.
Marcus is tense.
Leonard is bad.
Corwin is beautiful.If someone is tender or he is bad, then he is beautiful.
If Leonard is not wandering, then Bond is not intellectual.
If someone is wandering and not bad, then he is both tender and not intellectual, and vice versa.
Someone being intellectual is equivalent to being not wandering.
If someone is tender or he is tense, then he is not beautiful.
If there is someone who is either not wandering or not tense, then Leonard is not bad.
Someone being bad is equivalent to being not beautiful.
Corwin being not wandering and Leonard being not tense imply that Baird is bad.
Someone is tender and wandering if and only if he is not tense.
If there is someone who is not bad, then Marcus is tense.
if there is at least one people who is intellectual and wandering, then Leonard is not bad and Corwin is beautiful.
Someone who is tense is always both not intellectual and not beautiful. | Bond is beautiful. | self_contradiction |
Eunice is not bad.
Leonard is not intellectual.
Leonard is not wandering.
Eunice is tender.
Bond is tense.
Bond is intellectual.
Keegan is wandering.
Eunice is intellectual.
Bond is beautiful.
Marcus is tense.
Leonard is bad.
Corwin is beautiful.If someone is tender or he is bad, then he is beautiful.
If Leonard is not wandering, then Bond is not intellectual.
If someone is wandering and not bad, then he is both tender and not intellectual, and vice versa.
Someone being intellectual is equivalent to being not wandering.
If someone is tender or he is tense, then he is not beautiful.
If there is someone who is either not wandering or not tense, then Leonard is not bad.
Someone being bad is equivalent to being not beautiful.
Corwin being not wandering and Leonard being not tense imply that Baird is bad.
Someone is tender and wandering if and only if he is not tense.
If there is someone who is not bad, then Marcus is tense.
if there is at least one people who is intellectual and wandering, then Leonard is not bad and Corwin is beautiful.
Someone who is tense is always both not intellectual and not beautiful. | Eunice is not wandering. | entailment |
Eunice is not bad.
Leonard is not intellectual.
Leonard is not wandering.
Eunice is tender.
Bond is tense.
Bond is intellectual.
Keegan is wandering.
Eunice is intellectual.
Bond is beautiful.
Marcus is tense.
Leonard is bad.
Corwin is beautiful.If someone is tender or he is bad, then he is beautiful.
If Leonard is not wandering, then Bond is not intellectual.
If someone is wandering and not bad, then he is both tender and not intellectual, and vice versa.
Someone being intellectual is equivalent to being not wandering.
If someone is tender or he is tense, then he is not beautiful.
If there is someone who is either not wandering or not tense, then Leonard is not bad.
Someone being bad is equivalent to being not beautiful.
Corwin being not wandering and Leonard being not tense imply that Baird is bad.
Someone is tender and wandering if and only if he is not tense.
If there is someone who is not bad, then Marcus is tense.
if there is at least one people who is intellectual and wandering, then Leonard is not bad and Corwin is beautiful.
Someone who is tense is always both not intellectual and not beautiful. | Leonard is bad. | self_contradiction |
Eunice is not bad.
Leonard is not intellectual.
Leonard is not wandering.
Eunice is tender.
Bond is tense.
Bond is intellectual.
Keegan is wandering.
Eunice is intellectual.
Bond is beautiful.
Marcus is tense.
Leonard is bad.
Corwin is beautiful.If someone is tender or he is bad, then he is beautiful.
If Leonard is not wandering, then Bond is not intellectual.
If someone is wandering and not bad, then he is both tender and not intellectual, and vice versa.
Someone being intellectual is equivalent to being not wandering.
If someone is tender or he is tense, then he is not beautiful.
If there is someone who is either not wandering or not tense, then Leonard is not bad.
Someone being bad is equivalent to being not beautiful.
Corwin being not wandering and Leonard being not tense imply that Baird is bad.
Someone is tender and wandering if and only if he is not tense.
If there is someone who is not bad, then Marcus is tense.
if there is at least one people who is intellectual and wandering, then Leonard is not bad and Corwin is beautiful.
Someone who is tense is always both not intellectual and not beautiful. | Bond is wandering. | contradiction |
Eunice is not bad.
Leonard is not intellectual.
Leonard is not wandering.
Eunice is tender.
Bond is tense.
Bond is intellectual.
Keegan is wandering.
Eunice is intellectual.
Bond is beautiful.
Marcus is tense.
Leonard is bad.
Corwin is beautiful.If someone is tender or he is bad, then he is beautiful.
If Leonard is not wandering, then Bond is not intellectual.
If someone is wandering and not bad, then he is both tender and not intellectual, and vice versa.
Someone being intellectual is equivalent to being not wandering.
If someone is tender or he is tense, then he is not beautiful.
If there is someone who is either not wandering or not tense, then Leonard is not bad.
Someone being bad is equivalent to being not beautiful.
Corwin being not wandering and Leonard being not tense imply that Baird is bad.
Someone is tender and wandering if and only if he is not tense.
If there is someone who is not bad, then Marcus is tense.
if there is at least one people who is intellectual and wandering, then Leonard is not bad and Corwin is beautiful.
Someone who is tense is always both not intellectual and not beautiful. | Keegan is not beautiful. | neutral |
Eunice is not bad.
Leonard is not intellectual.
Leonard is not wandering.
Eunice is tender.
Bond is tense.
Bond is intellectual.
Keegan is wandering.
Eunice is intellectual.
Bond is beautiful.
Marcus is tense.
Leonard is bad.
Corwin is beautiful.If someone is tender or he is bad, then he is beautiful.
If Leonard is not wandering, then Bond is not intellectual.
If someone is wandering and not bad, then he is both tender and not intellectual, and vice versa.
Someone being intellectual is equivalent to being not wandering.
If someone is tender or he is tense, then he is not beautiful.
If there is someone who is either not wandering or not tense, then Leonard is not bad.
Someone being bad is equivalent to being not beautiful.
Corwin being not wandering and Leonard being not tense imply that Baird is bad.
Someone is tender and wandering if and only if he is not tense.
If there is someone who is not bad, then Marcus is tense.
if there is at least one people who is intellectual and wandering, then Leonard is not bad and Corwin is beautiful.
Someone who is tense is always both not intellectual and not beautiful. | Corwin is not wandering. | neutral |
Eunice is not bad.
Leonard is not intellectual.
Leonard is not wandering.
Eunice is tender.
Bond is tense.
Bond is intellectual.
Keegan is wandering.
Eunice is intellectual.
Bond is beautiful.
Marcus is tense.
Leonard is bad.
Corwin is beautiful.If someone is tender or he is bad, then he is beautiful.
If Leonard is not wandering, then Bond is not intellectual.
If someone is wandering and not bad, then he is both tender and not intellectual, and vice versa.
Someone being intellectual is equivalent to being not wandering.
If someone is tender or he is tense, then he is not beautiful.
If there is someone who is either not wandering or not tense, then Leonard is not bad.
Someone being bad is equivalent to being not beautiful.
Corwin being not wandering and Leonard being not tense imply that Baird is bad.
Someone is tender and wandering if and only if he is not tense.
If there is someone who is not bad, then Marcus is tense.
if there is at least one people who is intellectual and wandering, then Leonard is not bad and Corwin is beautiful.
Someone who is tense is always both not intellectual and not beautiful. | Eunice is wandering. | contradiction |
Eunice is not bad.
Leonard is not intellectual.
Leonard is not wandering.
Eunice is tender.
Bond is tense.
Bond is intellectual.
Keegan is wandering.
Eunice is intellectual.
Bond is beautiful.
Marcus is tense.
Leonard is bad.
Corwin is beautiful.If someone is tender or he is bad, then he is beautiful.
If Leonard is not wandering, then Bond is not intellectual.
If someone is wandering and not bad, then he is both tender and not intellectual, and vice versa.
Someone being intellectual is equivalent to being not wandering.
If someone is tender or he is tense, then he is not beautiful.
If there is someone who is either not wandering or not tense, then Leonard is not bad.
Someone being bad is equivalent to being not beautiful.
Corwin being not wandering and Leonard being not tense imply that Baird is bad.
Someone is tender and wandering if and only if he is not tense.
If there is someone who is not bad, then Marcus is tense.
if there is at least one people who is intellectual and wandering, then Leonard is not bad and Corwin is beautiful.
Someone who is tense is always both not intellectual and not beautiful. | Eunice is beautiful. | self_contradiction |
Eunice is not bad.
Leonard is not intellectual.
Leonard is not wandering.
Eunice is tender.
Bond is tense.
Bond is intellectual.
Keegan is wandering.
Eunice is intellectual.
Bond is beautiful.
Marcus is tense.
Leonard is bad.
Corwin is beautiful.If someone is tender or he is bad, then he is beautiful.
If Leonard is not wandering, then Bond is not intellectual.
If someone is wandering and not bad, then he is both tender and not intellectual, and vice versa.
Someone being intellectual is equivalent to being not wandering.
If someone is tender or he is tense, then he is not beautiful.
If there is someone who is either not wandering or not tense, then Leonard is not bad.
Someone being bad is equivalent to being not beautiful.
Corwin being not wandering and Leonard being not tense imply that Baird is bad.
Someone is tender and wandering if and only if he is not tense.
If there is someone who is not bad, then Marcus is tense.
if there is at least one people who is intellectual and wandering, then Leonard is not bad and Corwin is beautiful.
Someone who is tense is always both not intellectual and not beautiful. | Leonard is not beautiful. | self_contradiction |
Eunice is not bad.
Leonard is not intellectual.
Leonard is not wandering.
Eunice is tender.
Bond is tense.
Bond is intellectual.
Keegan is wandering.
Eunice is intellectual.
Bond is beautiful.
Marcus is tense.
Leonard is bad.
Corwin is beautiful.If someone is tender or he is bad, then he is beautiful.
If Leonard is not wandering, then Bond is not intellectual.
If someone is wandering and not bad, then he is both tender and not intellectual, and vice versa.
Someone being intellectual is equivalent to being not wandering.
If someone is tender or he is tense, then he is not beautiful.
If there is someone who is either not wandering or not tense, then Leonard is not bad.
Someone being bad is equivalent to being not beautiful.
Corwin being not wandering and Leonard being not tense imply that Baird is bad.
Someone is tender and wandering if and only if he is not tense.
If there is someone who is not bad, then Marcus is tense.
if there is at least one people who is intellectual and wandering, then Leonard is not bad and Corwin is beautiful.
Someone who is tense is always both not intellectual and not beautiful. | Bond is not tender. | neutral |
Eunice is not bad.
Leonard is not intellectual.
Leonard is not wandering.
Eunice is tender.
Bond is tense.
Bond is intellectual.
Keegan is wandering.
Eunice is intellectual.
Bond is beautiful.
Marcus is tense.
Leonard is bad.
Corwin is beautiful.If someone is tender or he is bad, then he is beautiful.
If Leonard is not wandering, then Bond is not intellectual.
If someone is wandering and not bad, then he is both tender and not intellectual, and vice versa.
Someone being intellectual is equivalent to being not wandering.
If someone is tender or he is tense, then he is not beautiful.
If there is someone who is either not wandering or not tense, then Leonard is not bad.
Someone being bad is equivalent to being not beautiful.
Corwin being not wandering and Leonard being not tense imply that Baird is bad.
Someone is tender and wandering if and only if he is not tense.
If there is someone who is not bad, then Marcus is tense.
if there is at least one people who is intellectual and wandering, then Leonard is not bad and Corwin is beautiful.
Someone who is tense is always both not intellectual and not beautiful. | Corwin is not bad. | neutral |
Eunice is not bad.
Leonard is not intellectual.
Leonard is not wandering.
Eunice is tender.
Bond is tense.
Bond is intellectual.
Keegan is wandering.
Eunice is intellectual.
Bond is beautiful.
Marcus is tense.
Leonard is bad.
Corwin is beautiful.If someone is tender or he is bad, then he is beautiful.
If Leonard is not wandering, then Bond is not intellectual.
If someone is wandering and not bad, then he is both tender and not intellectual, and vice versa.
Someone being intellectual is equivalent to being not wandering.
If someone is tender or he is tense, then he is not beautiful.
If there is someone who is either not wandering or not tense, then Leonard is not bad.
Someone being bad is equivalent to being not beautiful.
Corwin being not wandering and Leonard being not tense imply that Baird is bad.
Someone is tender and wandering if and only if he is not tense.
If there is someone who is not bad, then Marcus is tense.
if there is at least one people who is intellectual and wandering, then Leonard is not bad and Corwin is beautiful.
Someone who is tense is always both not intellectual and not beautiful. | Marcus is not bad. | contradiction |
Eunice is not bad.
Leonard is not intellectual.
Leonard is not wandering.
Eunice is tender.
Bond is tense.
Bond is intellectual.
Keegan is wandering.
Eunice is intellectual.
Bond is beautiful.
Marcus is tense.
Leonard is bad.
Corwin is beautiful.If someone is tender or he is bad, then he is beautiful.
If Leonard is not wandering, then Bond is not intellectual.
If someone is wandering and not bad, then he is both tender and not intellectual, and vice versa.
Someone being intellectual is equivalent to being not wandering.
If someone is tender or he is tense, then he is not beautiful.
If there is someone who is either not wandering or not tense, then Leonard is not bad.
Someone being bad is equivalent to being not beautiful.
Corwin being not wandering and Leonard being not tense imply that Baird is bad.
Someone is tender and wandering if and only if he is not tense.
If there is someone who is not bad, then Marcus is tense.
if there is at least one people who is intellectual and wandering, then Leonard is not bad and Corwin is beautiful.
Someone who is tense is always both not intellectual and not beautiful. | Bond is tense. | entailment |
Eunice is not bad.
Leonard is not intellectual.
Leonard is not wandering.
Eunice is tender.
Bond is tense.
Bond is intellectual.
Keegan is wandering.
Eunice is intellectual.
Bond is beautiful.
Marcus is tense.
Leonard is bad.
Corwin is beautiful.If someone is tender or he is bad, then he is beautiful.
If Leonard is not wandering, then Bond is not intellectual.
If someone is wandering and not bad, then he is both tender and not intellectual, and vice versa.
Someone being intellectual is equivalent to being not wandering.
If someone is tender or he is tense, then he is not beautiful.
If there is someone who is either not wandering or not tense, then Leonard is not bad.
Someone being bad is equivalent to being not beautiful.
Corwin being not wandering and Leonard being not tense imply that Baird is bad.
Someone is tender and wandering if and only if he is not tense.
If there is someone who is not bad, then Marcus is tense.
if there is at least one people who is intellectual and wandering, then Leonard is not bad and Corwin is beautiful.
Someone who is tense is always both not intellectual and not beautiful. | Eunice is not intellectual. | contradiction |
Eunice is not bad.
Leonard is not intellectual.
Leonard is not wandering.
Eunice is tender.
Bond is tense.
Bond is intellectual.
Keegan is wandering.
Eunice is intellectual.
Bond is beautiful.
Marcus is tense.
Leonard is bad.
Corwin is beautiful.If someone is tender or he is bad, then he is beautiful.
If Leonard is not wandering, then Bond is not intellectual.
If someone is wandering and not bad, then he is both tender and not intellectual, and vice versa.
Someone being intellectual is equivalent to being not wandering.
If someone is tender or he is tense, then he is not beautiful.
If there is someone who is either not wandering or not tense, then Leonard is not bad.
Someone being bad is equivalent to being not beautiful.
Corwin being not wandering and Leonard being not tense imply that Baird is bad.
Someone is tender and wandering if and only if he is not tense.
If there is someone who is not bad, then Marcus is tense.
if there is at least one people who is intellectual and wandering, then Leonard is not bad and Corwin is beautiful.
Someone who is tense is always both not intellectual and not beautiful. | Marcus is not tense. | contradiction |
Eunice is not bad.
Leonard is not intellectual.
Leonard is not wandering.
Eunice is tender.
Bond is tense.
Bond is intellectual.
Keegan is wandering.
Eunice is intellectual.
Bond is beautiful.
Marcus is tense.
Leonard is bad.
Corwin is beautiful.If someone is tender or he is bad, then he is beautiful.
If Leonard is not wandering, then Bond is not intellectual.
If someone is wandering and not bad, then he is both tender and not intellectual, and vice versa.
Someone being intellectual is equivalent to being not wandering.
If someone is tender or he is tense, then he is not beautiful.
If there is someone who is either not wandering or not tense, then Leonard is not bad.
Someone being bad is equivalent to being not beautiful.
Corwin being not wandering and Leonard being not tense imply that Baird is bad.
Someone is tender and wandering if and only if he is not tense.
If there is someone who is not bad, then Marcus is tense.
if there is at least one people who is intellectual and wandering, then Leonard is not bad and Corwin is beautiful.
Someone who is tense is always both not intellectual and not beautiful. | Keegan is wandering. | entailment |
Eunice is not bad.
Leonard is not intellectual.
Leonard is not wandering.
Eunice is tender.
Bond is tense.
Bond is intellectual.
Keegan is wandering.
Eunice is intellectual.
Bond is beautiful.
Marcus is tense.
Leonard is bad.
Corwin is beautiful.If someone is tender or he is bad, then he is beautiful.
If Leonard is not wandering, then Bond is not intellectual.
If someone is wandering and not bad, then he is both tender and not intellectual, and vice versa.
Someone being intellectual is equivalent to being not wandering.
If someone is tender or he is tense, then he is not beautiful.
If there is someone who is either not wandering or not tense, then Leonard is not bad.
Someone being bad is equivalent to being not beautiful.
Corwin being not wandering and Leonard being not tense imply that Baird is bad.
Someone is tender and wandering if and only if he is not tense.
If there is someone who is not bad, then Marcus is tense.
if there is at least one people who is intellectual and wandering, then Leonard is not bad and Corwin is beautiful.
Someone who is tense is always both not intellectual and not beautiful. | Marcus is tender. | neutral |
Eunice is not bad.
Leonard is not intellectual.
Leonard is not wandering.
Eunice is tender.
Bond is tense.
Bond is intellectual.
Keegan is wandering.
Eunice is intellectual.
Bond is beautiful.
Marcus is tense.
Leonard is bad.
Corwin is beautiful.If someone is tender or he is bad, then he is beautiful.
If Leonard is not wandering, then Bond is not intellectual.
If someone is wandering and not bad, then he is both tender and not intellectual, and vice versa.
Someone being intellectual is equivalent to being not wandering.
If someone is tender or he is tense, then he is not beautiful.
If there is someone who is either not wandering or not tense, then Leonard is not bad.
Someone being bad is equivalent to being not beautiful.
Corwin being not wandering and Leonard being not tense imply that Baird is bad.
Someone is tender and wandering if and only if he is not tense.
If there is someone who is not bad, then Marcus is tense.
if there is at least one people who is intellectual and wandering, then Leonard is not bad and Corwin is beautiful.
Someone who is tense is always both not intellectual and not beautiful. | Bond is bad. | entailment |
Eunice is not bad.
Leonard is not intellectual.
Leonard is not wandering.
Eunice is tender.
Bond is tense.
Bond is intellectual.
Keegan is wandering.
Eunice is intellectual.
Bond is beautiful.
Marcus is tense.
Leonard is bad.
Corwin is beautiful.If someone is tender or he is bad, then he is beautiful.
If Leonard is not wandering, then Bond is not intellectual.
If someone is wandering and not bad, then he is both tender and not intellectual, and vice versa.
Someone being intellectual is equivalent to being not wandering.
If someone is tender or he is tense, then he is not beautiful.
If there is someone who is either not wandering or not tense, then Leonard is not bad.
Someone being bad is equivalent to being not beautiful.
Corwin being not wandering and Leonard being not tense imply that Baird is bad.
Someone is tender and wandering if and only if he is not tense.
If there is someone who is not bad, then Marcus is tense.
if there is at least one people who is intellectual and wandering, then Leonard is not bad and Corwin is beautiful.
Someone who is tense is always both not intellectual and not beautiful. | Marcus is tense. | entailment |
Eunice is not bad.
Leonard is not intellectual.
Leonard is not wandering.
Eunice is tender.
Bond is tense.
Bond is intellectual.
Keegan is wandering.
Eunice is intellectual.
Bond is beautiful.
Marcus is tense.
Leonard is bad.
Corwin is beautiful.If someone is tender or he is bad, then he is beautiful.
If Leonard is not wandering, then Bond is not intellectual.
If someone is wandering and not bad, then he is both tender and not intellectual, and vice versa.
Someone being intellectual is equivalent to being not wandering.
If someone is tender or he is tense, then he is not beautiful.
If there is someone who is either not wandering or not tense, then Leonard is not bad.
Someone being bad is equivalent to being not beautiful.
Corwin being not wandering and Leonard being not tense imply that Baird is bad.
Someone is tender and wandering if and only if he is not tense.
If there is someone who is not bad, then Marcus is tense.
if there is at least one people who is intellectual and wandering, then Leonard is not bad and Corwin is beautiful.
Someone who is tense is always both not intellectual and not beautiful. | Leonard is intellectual. | self_contradiction |
Igor is not mean.
Laurence is boring.
Igor is not fair-minded.
Igor is creepy.
Quinlan is fair-minded.
Sidney is fair-minded.
Quinlan is mean.
Quinlan is not creepy.
Igor is purple.
Sidney is not mean.
Sherard is not boring.
Roy is not horrible.If Roy is not purple, then Sherard is not boring and Morton is not horrible.
If someone is boring or he is not fair-minded, then he is not purple.
If Sherard is purple or Morton is creepy, then Roy is mean.
If there is at least one people who is either purple or horrible, then Roy is not mean and Morton is not boring.
Sidney being boring or Sidney being purple implies that Igor is not creepy.
if there is at least one people who is not horrible and fair-minded, then Roy is not creepy and Quinlan is not boring.
Someone is purple and not creepy if and only if he is not boring.
Laurence being creepy or Quinlan being boring implies that Quinlan is not purple.
If someone who is not fair-minded is also not purple, then he is not boring.
If there is someone who is not horrible, then Roy is boring.
If someone who is horrible is also boring, then he is fair-minded.
Someone being both fair-minded and horrible is equivalent to being not boring and purple. | Sherard is not fair-minded. | contradiction |
Igor is not mean.
Laurence is boring.
Igor is not fair-minded.
Igor is creepy.
Quinlan is fair-minded.
Sidney is fair-minded.
Quinlan is mean.
Quinlan is not creepy.
Igor is purple.
Sidney is not mean.
Sherard is not boring.
Roy is not horrible.If Roy is not purple, then Sherard is not boring and Morton is not horrible.
If someone is boring or he is not fair-minded, then he is not purple.
If Sherard is purple or Morton is creepy, then Roy is mean.
If there is at least one people who is either purple or horrible, then Roy is not mean and Morton is not boring.
Sidney being boring or Sidney being purple implies that Igor is not creepy.
if there is at least one people who is not horrible and fair-minded, then Roy is not creepy and Quinlan is not boring.
Someone is purple and not creepy if and only if he is not boring.
Laurence being creepy or Quinlan being boring implies that Quinlan is not purple.
If someone who is not fair-minded is also not purple, then he is not boring.
If there is someone who is not horrible, then Roy is boring.
If someone who is horrible is also boring, then he is fair-minded.
Someone being both fair-minded and horrible is equivalent to being not boring and purple. | Quinlan is purple. | neutral |
Igor is not mean.
Laurence is boring.
Igor is not fair-minded.
Igor is creepy.
Quinlan is fair-minded.
Sidney is fair-minded.
Quinlan is mean.
Quinlan is not creepy.
Igor is purple.
Sidney is not mean.
Sherard is not boring.
Roy is not horrible.If Roy is not purple, then Sherard is not boring and Morton is not horrible.
If someone is boring or he is not fair-minded, then he is not purple.
If Sherard is purple or Morton is creepy, then Roy is mean.
If there is at least one people who is either purple or horrible, then Roy is not mean and Morton is not boring.
Sidney being boring or Sidney being purple implies that Igor is not creepy.
if there is at least one people who is not horrible and fair-minded, then Roy is not creepy and Quinlan is not boring.
Someone is purple and not creepy if and only if he is not boring.
Laurence being creepy or Quinlan being boring implies that Quinlan is not purple.
If someone who is not fair-minded is also not purple, then he is not boring.
If there is someone who is not horrible, then Roy is boring.
If someone who is horrible is also boring, then he is fair-minded.
Someone being both fair-minded and horrible is equivalent to being not boring and purple. | Laurence is boring. | entailment |
Igor is not mean.
Laurence is boring.
Igor is not fair-minded.
Igor is creepy.
Quinlan is fair-minded.
Sidney is fair-minded.
Quinlan is mean.
Quinlan is not creepy.
Igor is purple.
Sidney is not mean.
Sherard is not boring.
Roy is not horrible.If Roy is not purple, then Sherard is not boring and Morton is not horrible.
If someone is boring or he is not fair-minded, then he is not purple.
If Sherard is purple or Morton is creepy, then Roy is mean.
If there is at least one people who is either purple or horrible, then Roy is not mean and Morton is not boring.
Sidney being boring or Sidney being purple implies that Igor is not creepy.
if there is at least one people who is not horrible and fair-minded, then Roy is not creepy and Quinlan is not boring.
Someone is purple and not creepy if and only if he is not boring.
Laurence being creepy or Quinlan being boring implies that Quinlan is not purple.
If someone who is not fair-minded is also not purple, then he is not boring.
If there is someone who is not horrible, then Roy is boring.
If someone who is horrible is also boring, then he is fair-minded.
Someone being both fair-minded and horrible is equivalent to being not boring and purple. | Igor is not boring. | entailment |
Igor is not mean.
Laurence is boring.
Igor is not fair-minded.
Igor is creepy.
Quinlan is fair-minded.
Sidney is fair-minded.
Quinlan is mean.
Quinlan is not creepy.
Igor is purple.
Sidney is not mean.
Sherard is not boring.
Roy is not horrible.If Roy is not purple, then Sherard is not boring and Morton is not horrible.
If someone is boring or he is not fair-minded, then he is not purple.
If Sherard is purple or Morton is creepy, then Roy is mean.
If there is at least one people who is either purple or horrible, then Roy is not mean and Morton is not boring.
Sidney being boring or Sidney being purple implies that Igor is not creepy.
if there is at least one people who is not horrible and fair-minded, then Roy is not creepy and Quinlan is not boring.
Someone is purple and not creepy if and only if he is not boring.
Laurence being creepy or Quinlan being boring implies that Quinlan is not purple.
If someone who is not fair-minded is also not purple, then he is not boring.
If there is someone who is not horrible, then Roy is boring.
If someone who is horrible is also boring, then he is fair-minded.
Someone being both fair-minded and horrible is equivalent to being not boring and purple. | Laurence is not boring. | contradiction |
Igor is not mean.
Laurence is boring.
Igor is not fair-minded.
Igor is creepy.
Quinlan is fair-minded.
Sidney is fair-minded.
Quinlan is mean.
Quinlan is not creepy.
Igor is purple.
Sidney is not mean.
Sherard is not boring.
Roy is not horrible.If Roy is not purple, then Sherard is not boring and Morton is not horrible.
If someone is boring or he is not fair-minded, then he is not purple.
If Sherard is purple or Morton is creepy, then Roy is mean.
If there is at least one people who is either purple or horrible, then Roy is not mean and Morton is not boring.
Sidney being boring or Sidney being purple implies that Igor is not creepy.
if there is at least one people who is not horrible and fair-minded, then Roy is not creepy and Quinlan is not boring.
Someone is purple and not creepy if and only if he is not boring.
Laurence being creepy or Quinlan being boring implies that Quinlan is not purple.
If someone who is not fair-minded is also not purple, then he is not boring.
If there is someone who is not horrible, then Roy is boring.
If someone who is horrible is also boring, then he is fair-minded.
Someone being both fair-minded and horrible is equivalent to being not boring and purple. | Roy is creepy. | neutral |
Igor is not mean.
Laurence is boring.
Igor is not fair-minded.
Igor is creepy.
Quinlan is fair-minded.
Sidney is fair-minded.
Quinlan is mean.
Quinlan is not creepy.
Igor is purple.
Sidney is not mean.
Sherard is not boring.
Roy is not horrible.If Roy is not purple, then Sherard is not boring and Morton is not horrible.
If someone is boring or he is not fair-minded, then he is not purple.
If Sherard is purple or Morton is creepy, then Roy is mean.
If there is at least one people who is either purple or horrible, then Roy is not mean and Morton is not boring.
Sidney being boring or Sidney being purple implies that Igor is not creepy.
if there is at least one people who is not horrible and fair-minded, then Roy is not creepy and Quinlan is not boring.
Someone is purple and not creepy if and only if he is not boring.
Laurence being creepy or Quinlan being boring implies that Quinlan is not purple.
If someone who is not fair-minded is also not purple, then he is not boring.
If there is someone who is not horrible, then Roy is boring.
If someone who is horrible is also boring, then he is fair-minded.
Someone being both fair-minded and horrible is equivalent to being not boring and purple. | Laurence is horrible. | neutral |
Igor is not mean.
Laurence is boring.
Igor is not fair-minded.
Igor is creepy.
Quinlan is fair-minded.
Sidney is fair-minded.
Quinlan is mean.
Quinlan is not creepy.
Igor is purple.
Sidney is not mean.
Sherard is not boring.
Roy is not horrible.If Roy is not purple, then Sherard is not boring and Morton is not horrible.
If someone is boring or he is not fair-minded, then he is not purple.
If Sherard is purple or Morton is creepy, then Roy is mean.
If there is at least one people who is either purple or horrible, then Roy is not mean and Morton is not boring.
Sidney being boring or Sidney being purple implies that Igor is not creepy.
if there is at least one people who is not horrible and fair-minded, then Roy is not creepy and Quinlan is not boring.
Someone is purple and not creepy if and only if he is not boring.
Laurence being creepy or Quinlan being boring implies that Quinlan is not purple.
If someone who is not fair-minded is also not purple, then he is not boring.
If there is someone who is not horrible, then Roy is boring.
If someone who is horrible is also boring, then he is fair-minded.
Someone being both fair-minded and horrible is equivalent to being not boring and purple. | Morton is horrible. | self_contradiction |
Igor is not mean.
Laurence is boring.
Igor is not fair-minded.
Igor is creepy.
Quinlan is fair-minded.
Sidney is fair-minded.
Quinlan is mean.
Quinlan is not creepy.
Igor is purple.
Sidney is not mean.
Sherard is not boring.
Roy is not horrible.If Roy is not purple, then Sherard is not boring and Morton is not horrible.
If someone is boring or he is not fair-minded, then he is not purple.
If Sherard is purple or Morton is creepy, then Roy is mean.
If there is at least one people who is either purple or horrible, then Roy is not mean and Morton is not boring.
Sidney being boring or Sidney being purple implies that Igor is not creepy.
if there is at least one people who is not horrible and fair-minded, then Roy is not creepy and Quinlan is not boring.
Someone is purple and not creepy if and only if he is not boring.
Laurence being creepy or Quinlan being boring implies that Quinlan is not purple.
If someone who is not fair-minded is also not purple, then he is not boring.
If there is someone who is not horrible, then Roy is boring.
If someone who is horrible is also boring, then he is fair-minded.
Someone being both fair-minded and horrible is equivalent to being not boring and purple. | Laurence is not horrible. | neutral |
Igor is not mean.
Laurence is boring.
Igor is not fair-minded.
Igor is creepy.
Quinlan is fair-minded.
Sidney is fair-minded.
Quinlan is mean.
Quinlan is not creepy.
Igor is purple.
Sidney is not mean.
Sherard is not boring.
Roy is not horrible.If Roy is not purple, then Sherard is not boring and Morton is not horrible.
If someone is boring or he is not fair-minded, then he is not purple.
If Sherard is purple or Morton is creepy, then Roy is mean.
If there is at least one people who is either purple or horrible, then Roy is not mean and Morton is not boring.
Sidney being boring or Sidney being purple implies that Igor is not creepy.
if there is at least one people who is not horrible and fair-minded, then Roy is not creepy and Quinlan is not boring.
Someone is purple and not creepy if and only if he is not boring.
Laurence being creepy or Quinlan being boring implies that Quinlan is not purple.
If someone who is not fair-minded is also not purple, then he is not boring.
If there is someone who is not horrible, then Roy is boring.
If someone who is horrible is also boring, then he is fair-minded.
Someone being both fair-minded and horrible is equivalent to being not boring and purple. | Quinlan is mean. | entailment |
Igor is not mean.
Laurence is boring.
Igor is not fair-minded.
Igor is creepy.
Quinlan is fair-minded.
Sidney is fair-minded.
Quinlan is mean.
Quinlan is not creepy.
Igor is purple.
Sidney is not mean.
Sherard is not boring.
Roy is not horrible.If Roy is not purple, then Sherard is not boring and Morton is not horrible.
If someone is boring or he is not fair-minded, then he is not purple.
If Sherard is purple or Morton is creepy, then Roy is mean.
If there is at least one people who is either purple or horrible, then Roy is not mean and Morton is not boring.
Sidney being boring or Sidney being purple implies that Igor is not creepy.
if there is at least one people who is not horrible and fair-minded, then Roy is not creepy and Quinlan is not boring.
Someone is purple and not creepy if and only if he is not boring.
Laurence being creepy or Quinlan being boring implies that Quinlan is not purple.
If someone who is not fair-minded is also not purple, then he is not boring.
If there is someone who is not horrible, then Roy is boring.
If someone who is horrible is also boring, then he is fair-minded.
Someone being both fair-minded and horrible is equivalent to being not boring and purple. | Sherard is not boring. | entailment |
Igor is not mean.
Laurence is boring.
Igor is not fair-minded.
Igor is creepy.
Quinlan is fair-minded.
Sidney is fair-minded.
Quinlan is mean.
Quinlan is not creepy.
Igor is purple.
Sidney is not mean.
Sherard is not boring.
Roy is not horrible.If Roy is not purple, then Sherard is not boring and Morton is not horrible.
If someone is boring or he is not fair-minded, then he is not purple.
If Sherard is purple or Morton is creepy, then Roy is mean.
If there is at least one people who is either purple or horrible, then Roy is not mean and Morton is not boring.
Sidney being boring or Sidney being purple implies that Igor is not creepy.
if there is at least one people who is not horrible and fair-minded, then Roy is not creepy and Quinlan is not boring.
Someone is purple and not creepy if and only if he is not boring.
Laurence being creepy or Quinlan being boring implies that Quinlan is not purple.
If someone who is not fair-minded is also not purple, then he is not boring.
If there is someone who is not horrible, then Roy is boring.
If someone who is horrible is also boring, then he is fair-minded.
Someone being both fair-minded and horrible is equivalent to being not boring and purple. | Igor is not mean. | entailment |
Igor is not mean.
Laurence is boring.
Igor is not fair-minded.
Igor is creepy.
Quinlan is fair-minded.
Sidney is fair-minded.
Quinlan is mean.
Quinlan is not creepy.
Igor is purple.
Sidney is not mean.
Sherard is not boring.
Roy is not horrible.If Roy is not purple, then Sherard is not boring and Morton is not horrible.
If someone is boring or he is not fair-minded, then he is not purple.
If Sherard is purple or Morton is creepy, then Roy is mean.
If there is at least one people who is either purple or horrible, then Roy is not mean and Morton is not boring.
Sidney being boring or Sidney being purple implies that Igor is not creepy.
if there is at least one people who is not horrible and fair-minded, then Roy is not creepy and Quinlan is not boring.
Someone is purple and not creepy if and only if he is not boring.
Laurence being creepy or Quinlan being boring implies that Quinlan is not purple.
If someone who is not fair-minded is also not purple, then he is not boring.
If there is someone who is not horrible, then Roy is boring.
If someone who is horrible is also boring, then he is fair-minded.
Someone being both fair-minded and horrible is equivalent to being not boring and purple. | Laurence is not mean. | neutral |
Igor is not mean.
Laurence is boring.
Igor is not fair-minded.
Igor is creepy.
Quinlan is fair-minded.
Sidney is fair-minded.
Quinlan is mean.
Quinlan is not creepy.
Igor is purple.
Sidney is not mean.
Sherard is not boring.
Roy is not horrible.If Roy is not purple, then Sherard is not boring and Morton is not horrible.
If someone is boring or he is not fair-minded, then he is not purple.
If Sherard is purple or Morton is creepy, then Roy is mean.
If there is at least one people who is either purple or horrible, then Roy is not mean and Morton is not boring.
Sidney being boring or Sidney being purple implies that Igor is not creepy.
if there is at least one people who is not horrible and fair-minded, then Roy is not creepy and Quinlan is not boring.
Someone is purple and not creepy if and only if he is not boring.
Laurence being creepy or Quinlan being boring implies that Quinlan is not purple.
If someone who is not fair-minded is also not purple, then he is not boring.
If there is someone who is not horrible, then Roy is boring.
If someone who is horrible is also boring, then he is fair-minded.
Someone being both fair-minded and horrible is equivalent to being not boring and purple. | Morton is not horrible. | self_contradiction |
Igor is not mean.
Laurence is boring.
Igor is not fair-minded.
Igor is creepy.
Quinlan is fair-minded.
Sidney is fair-minded.
Quinlan is mean.
Quinlan is not creepy.
Igor is purple.
Sidney is not mean.
Sherard is not boring.
Roy is not horrible.If Roy is not purple, then Sherard is not boring and Morton is not horrible.
If someone is boring or he is not fair-minded, then he is not purple.
If Sherard is purple or Morton is creepy, then Roy is mean.
If there is at least one people who is either purple or horrible, then Roy is not mean and Morton is not boring.
Sidney being boring or Sidney being purple implies that Igor is not creepy.
if there is at least one people who is not horrible and fair-minded, then Roy is not creepy and Quinlan is not boring.
Someone is purple and not creepy if and only if he is not boring.
Laurence being creepy or Quinlan being boring implies that Quinlan is not purple.
If someone who is not fair-minded is also not purple, then he is not boring.
If there is someone who is not horrible, then Roy is boring.
If someone who is horrible is also boring, then he is fair-minded.
Someone being both fair-minded and horrible is equivalent to being not boring and purple. | Sherard is boring. | contradiction |
Igor is not mean.
Laurence is boring.
Igor is not fair-minded.
Igor is creepy.
Quinlan is fair-minded.
Sidney is fair-minded.
Quinlan is mean.
Quinlan is not creepy.
Igor is purple.
Sidney is not mean.
Sherard is not boring.
Roy is not horrible.If Roy is not purple, then Sherard is not boring and Morton is not horrible.
If someone is boring or he is not fair-minded, then he is not purple.
If Sherard is purple or Morton is creepy, then Roy is mean.
If there is at least one people who is either purple or horrible, then Roy is not mean and Morton is not boring.
Sidney being boring or Sidney being purple implies that Igor is not creepy.
if there is at least one people who is not horrible and fair-minded, then Roy is not creepy and Quinlan is not boring.
Someone is purple and not creepy if and only if he is not boring.
Laurence being creepy or Quinlan being boring implies that Quinlan is not purple.
If someone who is not fair-minded is also not purple, then he is not boring.
If there is someone who is not horrible, then Roy is boring.
If someone who is horrible is also boring, then he is fair-minded.
Someone being both fair-minded and horrible is equivalent to being not boring and purple. | Igor is mean. | contradiction |
Igor is not mean.
Laurence is boring.
Igor is not fair-minded.
Igor is creepy.
Quinlan is fair-minded.
Sidney is fair-minded.
Quinlan is mean.
Quinlan is not creepy.
Igor is purple.
Sidney is not mean.
Sherard is not boring.
Roy is not horrible.If Roy is not purple, then Sherard is not boring and Morton is not horrible.
If someone is boring or he is not fair-minded, then he is not purple.
If Sherard is purple or Morton is creepy, then Roy is mean.
If there is at least one people who is either purple or horrible, then Roy is not mean and Morton is not boring.
Sidney being boring or Sidney being purple implies that Igor is not creepy.
if there is at least one people who is not horrible and fair-minded, then Roy is not creepy and Quinlan is not boring.
Someone is purple and not creepy if and only if he is not boring.
Laurence being creepy or Quinlan being boring implies that Quinlan is not purple.
If someone who is not fair-minded is also not purple, then he is not boring.
If there is someone who is not horrible, then Roy is boring.
If someone who is horrible is also boring, then he is fair-minded.
Someone being both fair-minded and horrible is equivalent to being not boring and purple. | Igor is not creepy. | self_contradiction |
Igor is not mean.
Laurence is boring.
Igor is not fair-minded.
Igor is creepy.
Quinlan is fair-minded.
Sidney is fair-minded.
Quinlan is mean.
Quinlan is not creepy.
Igor is purple.
Sidney is not mean.
Sherard is not boring.
Roy is not horrible.If Roy is not purple, then Sherard is not boring and Morton is not horrible.
If someone is boring or he is not fair-minded, then he is not purple.
If Sherard is purple or Morton is creepy, then Roy is mean.
If there is at least one people who is either purple or horrible, then Roy is not mean and Morton is not boring.
Sidney being boring or Sidney being purple implies that Igor is not creepy.
if there is at least one people who is not horrible and fair-minded, then Roy is not creepy and Quinlan is not boring.
Someone is purple and not creepy if and only if he is not boring.
Laurence being creepy or Quinlan being boring implies that Quinlan is not purple.
If someone who is not fair-minded is also not purple, then he is not boring.
If there is someone who is not horrible, then Roy is boring.
If someone who is horrible is also boring, then he is fair-minded.
Someone being both fair-minded and horrible is equivalent to being not boring and purple. | Igor is boring. | contradiction |
Igor is not mean.
Laurence is boring.
Igor is not fair-minded.
Igor is creepy.
Quinlan is fair-minded.
Sidney is fair-minded.
Quinlan is mean.
Quinlan is not creepy.
Igor is purple.
Sidney is not mean.
Sherard is not boring.
Roy is not horrible.If Roy is not purple, then Sherard is not boring and Morton is not horrible.
If someone is boring or he is not fair-minded, then he is not purple.
If Sherard is purple or Morton is creepy, then Roy is mean.
If there is at least one people who is either purple or horrible, then Roy is not mean and Morton is not boring.
Sidney being boring or Sidney being purple implies that Igor is not creepy.
if there is at least one people who is not horrible and fair-minded, then Roy is not creepy and Quinlan is not boring.
Someone is purple and not creepy if and only if he is not boring.
Laurence being creepy or Quinlan being boring implies that Quinlan is not purple.
If someone who is not fair-minded is also not purple, then he is not boring.
If there is someone who is not horrible, then Roy is boring.
If someone who is horrible is also boring, then he is fair-minded.
Someone being both fair-minded and horrible is equivalent to being not boring and purple. | Igor is not purple. | self_contradiction |
Igor is not mean.
Laurence is boring.
Igor is not fair-minded.
Igor is creepy.
Quinlan is fair-minded.
Sidney is fair-minded.
Quinlan is mean.
Quinlan is not creepy.
Igor is purple.
Sidney is not mean.
Sherard is not boring.
Roy is not horrible.If Roy is not purple, then Sherard is not boring and Morton is not horrible.
If someone is boring or he is not fair-minded, then he is not purple.
If Sherard is purple or Morton is creepy, then Roy is mean.
If there is at least one people who is either purple or horrible, then Roy is not mean and Morton is not boring.
Sidney being boring or Sidney being purple implies that Igor is not creepy.
if there is at least one people who is not horrible and fair-minded, then Roy is not creepy and Quinlan is not boring.
Someone is purple and not creepy if and only if he is not boring.
Laurence being creepy or Quinlan being boring implies that Quinlan is not purple.
If someone who is not fair-minded is also not purple, then he is not boring.
If there is someone who is not horrible, then Roy is boring.
If someone who is horrible is also boring, then he is fair-minded.
Someone being both fair-minded and horrible is equivalent to being not boring and purple. | Igor is not fair-minded. | self_contradiction |
Ron is unfair.
Sophia is outrageous.
Buck is unfair.
Sherlock is not angry.
Kiefer is not powerful.
Sherlock is not powerful.
Charlie is unfair.
Sherlock is outrageous.
Buck is powerful.
Jarvis is not powerful.
Sherlock is not obnoxious.
Buck is angry.If there is at least one people who is outrageous, then Jarvis is not unfair.
If someone is not powerful or unfair, then he is not wooden.
If there is someone who is either not obnoxious or not outrageous, then Sherlock is powerful and Sherlock is angry.
If there is at least one people who is not outrageous, then Buck is not wooden.
If Sophia is not unfair, then Sherlock is not obnoxious, and vice versa.
Someone who is not unfair is always both not outrageous and obnoxious.
Charlie being not outrageous is equivalent to Jarvis being obnoxious.
Someone being both not powerful and outrageous is equivalent to being obnoxious.
It can be concluded that Buck is not angry once knowing that Sophia is outrageous and Kiefer is powerful.
If someone is not outrageous and powerful, then he is both not obnoxious and unfair, and vice versa.
If someone who is not outrageous is also not angry, then he is not wooden.
If there is someone who is both powerful and not unfair, then Jarvis is wooden. | Charlie is wooden. | contradiction |
Ron is unfair.
Sophia is outrageous.
Buck is unfair.
Sherlock is not angry.
Kiefer is not powerful.
Sherlock is not powerful.
Charlie is unfair.
Sherlock is outrageous.
Buck is powerful.
Jarvis is not powerful.
Sherlock is not obnoxious.
Buck is angry.If there is at least one people who is outrageous, then Jarvis is not unfair.
If someone is not powerful or unfair, then he is not wooden.
If there is someone who is either not obnoxious or not outrageous, then Sherlock is powerful and Sherlock is angry.
If there is at least one people who is not outrageous, then Buck is not wooden.
If Sophia is not unfair, then Sherlock is not obnoxious, and vice versa.
Someone who is not unfair is always both not outrageous and obnoxious.
Charlie being not outrageous is equivalent to Jarvis being obnoxious.
Someone being both not powerful and outrageous is equivalent to being obnoxious.
It can be concluded that Buck is not angry once knowing that Sophia is outrageous and Kiefer is powerful.
If someone is not outrageous and powerful, then he is both not obnoxious and unfair, and vice versa.
If someone who is not outrageous is also not angry, then he is not wooden.
If there is someone who is both powerful and not unfair, then Jarvis is wooden. | Buck is powerful. | entailment |
Ron is unfair.
Sophia is outrageous.
Buck is unfair.
Sherlock is not angry.
Kiefer is not powerful.
Sherlock is not powerful.
Charlie is unfair.
Sherlock is outrageous.
Buck is powerful.
Jarvis is not powerful.
Sherlock is not obnoxious.
Buck is angry.If there is at least one people who is outrageous, then Jarvis is not unfair.
If someone is not powerful or unfair, then he is not wooden.
If there is someone who is either not obnoxious or not outrageous, then Sherlock is powerful and Sherlock is angry.
If there is at least one people who is not outrageous, then Buck is not wooden.
If Sophia is not unfair, then Sherlock is not obnoxious, and vice versa.
Someone who is not unfair is always both not outrageous and obnoxious.
Charlie being not outrageous is equivalent to Jarvis being obnoxious.
Someone being both not powerful and outrageous is equivalent to being obnoxious.
It can be concluded that Buck is not angry once knowing that Sophia is outrageous and Kiefer is powerful.
If someone is not outrageous and powerful, then he is both not obnoxious and unfair, and vice versa.
If someone who is not outrageous is also not angry, then he is not wooden.
If there is someone who is both powerful and not unfair, then Jarvis is wooden. | Kiefer is angry. | neutral |
Ron is unfair.
Sophia is outrageous.
Buck is unfair.
Sherlock is not angry.
Kiefer is not powerful.
Sherlock is not powerful.
Charlie is unfair.
Sherlock is outrageous.
Buck is powerful.
Jarvis is not powerful.
Sherlock is not obnoxious.
Buck is angry.If there is at least one people who is outrageous, then Jarvis is not unfair.
If someone is not powerful or unfair, then he is not wooden.
If there is someone who is either not obnoxious or not outrageous, then Sherlock is powerful and Sherlock is angry.
If there is at least one people who is not outrageous, then Buck is not wooden.
If Sophia is not unfair, then Sherlock is not obnoxious, and vice versa.
Someone who is not unfair is always both not outrageous and obnoxious.
Charlie being not outrageous is equivalent to Jarvis being obnoxious.
Someone being both not powerful and outrageous is equivalent to being obnoxious.
It can be concluded that Buck is not angry once knowing that Sophia is outrageous and Kiefer is powerful.
If someone is not outrageous and powerful, then he is both not obnoxious and unfair, and vice versa.
If someone who is not outrageous is also not angry, then he is not wooden.
If there is someone who is both powerful and not unfair, then Jarvis is wooden. | Buck is not wooden. | entailment |
Ron is unfair.
Sophia is outrageous.
Buck is unfair.
Sherlock is not angry.
Kiefer is not powerful.
Sherlock is not powerful.
Charlie is unfair.
Sherlock is outrageous.
Buck is powerful.
Jarvis is not powerful.
Sherlock is not obnoxious.
Buck is angry.If there is at least one people who is outrageous, then Jarvis is not unfair.
If someone is not powerful or unfair, then he is not wooden.
If there is someone who is either not obnoxious or not outrageous, then Sherlock is powerful and Sherlock is angry.
If there is at least one people who is not outrageous, then Buck is not wooden.
If Sophia is not unfair, then Sherlock is not obnoxious, and vice versa.
Someone who is not unfair is always both not outrageous and obnoxious.
Charlie being not outrageous is equivalent to Jarvis being obnoxious.
Someone being both not powerful and outrageous is equivalent to being obnoxious.
It can be concluded that Buck is not angry once knowing that Sophia is outrageous and Kiefer is powerful.
If someone is not outrageous and powerful, then he is both not obnoxious and unfair, and vice versa.
If someone who is not outrageous is also not angry, then he is not wooden.
If there is someone who is both powerful and not unfair, then Jarvis is wooden. | Sherlock is not powerful. | self_contradiction |
Ron is unfair.
Sophia is outrageous.
Buck is unfair.
Sherlock is not angry.
Kiefer is not powerful.
Sherlock is not powerful.
Charlie is unfair.
Sherlock is outrageous.
Buck is powerful.
Jarvis is not powerful.
Sherlock is not obnoxious.
Buck is angry.If there is at least one people who is outrageous, then Jarvis is not unfair.
If someone is not powerful or unfair, then he is not wooden.
If there is someone who is either not obnoxious or not outrageous, then Sherlock is powerful and Sherlock is angry.
If there is at least one people who is not outrageous, then Buck is not wooden.
If Sophia is not unfair, then Sherlock is not obnoxious, and vice versa.
Someone who is not unfair is always both not outrageous and obnoxious.
Charlie being not outrageous is equivalent to Jarvis being obnoxious.
Someone being both not powerful and outrageous is equivalent to being obnoxious.
It can be concluded that Buck is not angry once knowing that Sophia is outrageous and Kiefer is powerful.
If someone is not outrageous and powerful, then he is both not obnoxious and unfair, and vice versa.
If someone who is not outrageous is also not angry, then he is not wooden.
If there is someone who is both powerful and not unfair, then Jarvis is wooden. | Kiefer is wooden. | contradiction |
Ron is unfair.
Sophia is outrageous.
Buck is unfair.
Sherlock is not angry.
Kiefer is not powerful.
Sherlock is not powerful.
Charlie is unfair.
Sherlock is outrageous.
Buck is powerful.
Jarvis is not powerful.
Sherlock is not obnoxious.
Buck is angry.If there is at least one people who is outrageous, then Jarvis is not unfair.
If someone is not powerful or unfair, then he is not wooden.
If there is someone who is either not obnoxious or not outrageous, then Sherlock is powerful and Sherlock is angry.
If there is at least one people who is not outrageous, then Buck is not wooden.
If Sophia is not unfair, then Sherlock is not obnoxious, and vice versa.
Someone who is not unfair is always both not outrageous and obnoxious.
Charlie being not outrageous is equivalent to Jarvis being obnoxious.
Someone being both not powerful and outrageous is equivalent to being obnoxious.
It can be concluded that Buck is not angry once knowing that Sophia is outrageous and Kiefer is powerful.
If someone is not outrageous and powerful, then he is both not obnoxious and unfair, and vice versa.
If someone who is not outrageous is also not angry, then he is not wooden.
If there is someone who is both powerful and not unfair, then Jarvis is wooden. | Jarvis is outrageous. | self_contradiction |
Ron is unfair.
Sophia is outrageous.
Buck is unfair.
Sherlock is not angry.
Kiefer is not powerful.
Sherlock is not powerful.
Charlie is unfair.
Sherlock is outrageous.
Buck is powerful.
Jarvis is not powerful.
Sherlock is not obnoxious.
Buck is angry.If there is at least one people who is outrageous, then Jarvis is not unfair.
If someone is not powerful or unfair, then he is not wooden.
If there is someone who is either not obnoxious or not outrageous, then Sherlock is powerful and Sherlock is angry.
If there is at least one people who is not outrageous, then Buck is not wooden.
If Sophia is not unfair, then Sherlock is not obnoxious, and vice versa.
Someone who is not unfair is always both not outrageous and obnoxious.
Charlie being not outrageous is equivalent to Jarvis being obnoxious.
Someone being both not powerful and outrageous is equivalent to being obnoxious.
It can be concluded that Buck is not angry once knowing that Sophia is outrageous and Kiefer is powerful.
If someone is not outrageous and powerful, then he is both not obnoxious and unfair, and vice versa.
If someone who is not outrageous is also not angry, then he is not wooden.
If there is someone who is both powerful and not unfair, then Jarvis is wooden. | Sophia is obnoxious. | entailment |
Ron is unfair.
Sophia is outrageous.
Buck is unfair.
Sherlock is not angry.
Kiefer is not powerful.
Sherlock is not powerful.
Charlie is unfair.
Sherlock is outrageous.
Buck is powerful.
Jarvis is not powerful.
Sherlock is not obnoxious.
Buck is angry.If there is at least one people who is outrageous, then Jarvis is not unfair.
If someone is not powerful or unfair, then he is not wooden.
If there is someone who is either not obnoxious or not outrageous, then Sherlock is powerful and Sherlock is angry.
If there is at least one people who is not outrageous, then Buck is not wooden.
If Sophia is not unfair, then Sherlock is not obnoxious, and vice versa.
Someone who is not unfair is always both not outrageous and obnoxious.
Charlie being not outrageous is equivalent to Jarvis being obnoxious.
Someone being both not powerful and outrageous is equivalent to being obnoxious.
It can be concluded that Buck is not angry once knowing that Sophia is outrageous and Kiefer is powerful.
If someone is not outrageous and powerful, then he is both not obnoxious and unfair, and vice versa.
If someone who is not outrageous is also not angry, then he is not wooden.
If there is someone who is both powerful and not unfair, then Jarvis is wooden. | Kiefer is not outrageous. | neutral |
Ron is unfair.
Sophia is outrageous.
Buck is unfair.
Sherlock is not angry.
Kiefer is not powerful.
Sherlock is not powerful.
Charlie is unfair.
Sherlock is outrageous.
Buck is powerful.
Jarvis is not powerful.
Sherlock is not obnoxious.
Buck is angry.If there is at least one people who is outrageous, then Jarvis is not unfair.
If someone is not powerful or unfair, then he is not wooden.
If there is someone who is either not obnoxious or not outrageous, then Sherlock is powerful and Sherlock is angry.
If there is at least one people who is not outrageous, then Buck is not wooden.
If Sophia is not unfair, then Sherlock is not obnoxious, and vice versa.
Someone who is not unfair is always both not outrageous and obnoxious.
Charlie being not outrageous is equivalent to Jarvis being obnoxious.
Someone being both not powerful and outrageous is equivalent to being obnoxious.
It can be concluded that Buck is not angry once knowing that Sophia is outrageous and Kiefer is powerful.
If someone is not outrageous and powerful, then he is both not obnoxious and unfair, and vice versa.
If someone who is not outrageous is also not angry, then he is not wooden.
If there is someone who is both powerful and not unfair, then Jarvis is wooden. | Sherlock is angry. | self_contradiction |
Ron is unfair.
Sophia is outrageous.
Buck is unfair.
Sherlock is not angry.
Kiefer is not powerful.
Sherlock is not powerful.
Charlie is unfair.
Sherlock is outrageous.
Buck is powerful.
Jarvis is not powerful.
Sherlock is not obnoxious.
Buck is angry.If there is at least one people who is outrageous, then Jarvis is not unfair.
If someone is not powerful or unfair, then he is not wooden.
If there is someone who is either not obnoxious or not outrageous, then Sherlock is powerful and Sherlock is angry.
If there is at least one people who is not outrageous, then Buck is not wooden.
If Sophia is not unfair, then Sherlock is not obnoxious, and vice versa.
Someone who is not unfair is always both not outrageous and obnoxious.
Charlie being not outrageous is equivalent to Jarvis being obnoxious.
Someone being both not powerful and outrageous is equivalent to being obnoxious.
It can be concluded that Buck is not angry once knowing that Sophia is outrageous and Kiefer is powerful.
If someone is not outrageous and powerful, then he is both not obnoxious and unfair, and vice versa.
If someone who is not outrageous is also not angry, then he is not wooden.
If there is someone who is both powerful and not unfair, then Jarvis is wooden. | Ron is not unfair. | contradiction |
Ron is unfair.
Sophia is outrageous.
Buck is unfair.
Sherlock is not angry.
Kiefer is not powerful.
Sherlock is not powerful.
Charlie is unfair.
Sherlock is outrageous.
Buck is powerful.
Jarvis is not powerful.
Sherlock is not obnoxious.
Buck is angry.If there is at least one people who is outrageous, then Jarvis is not unfair.
If someone is not powerful or unfair, then he is not wooden.
If there is someone who is either not obnoxious or not outrageous, then Sherlock is powerful and Sherlock is angry.
If there is at least one people who is not outrageous, then Buck is not wooden.
If Sophia is not unfair, then Sherlock is not obnoxious, and vice versa.
Someone who is not unfair is always both not outrageous and obnoxious.
Charlie being not outrageous is equivalent to Jarvis being obnoxious.
Someone being both not powerful and outrageous is equivalent to being obnoxious.
It can be concluded that Buck is not angry once knowing that Sophia is outrageous and Kiefer is powerful.
If someone is not outrageous and powerful, then he is both not obnoxious and unfair, and vice versa.
If someone who is not outrageous is also not angry, then he is not wooden.
If there is someone who is both powerful and not unfair, then Jarvis is wooden. | Sophia is not powerful. | entailment |
Ron is unfair.
Sophia is outrageous.
Buck is unfair.
Sherlock is not angry.
Kiefer is not powerful.
Sherlock is not powerful.
Charlie is unfair.
Sherlock is outrageous.
Buck is powerful.
Jarvis is not powerful.
Sherlock is not obnoxious.
Buck is angry.If there is at least one people who is outrageous, then Jarvis is not unfair.
If someone is not powerful or unfair, then he is not wooden.
If there is someone who is either not obnoxious or not outrageous, then Sherlock is powerful and Sherlock is angry.
If there is at least one people who is not outrageous, then Buck is not wooden.
If Sophia is not unfair, then Sherlock is not obnoxious, and vice versa.
Someone who is not unfair is always both not outrageous and obnoxious.
Charlie being not outrageous is equivalent to Jarvis being obnoxious.
Someone being both not powerful and outrageous is equivalent to being obnoxious.
It can be concluded that Buck is not angry once knowing that Sophia is outrageous and Kiefer is powerful.
If someone is not outrageous and powerful, then he is both not obnoxious and unfair, and vice versa.
If someone who is not outrageous is also not angry, then he is not wooden.
If there is someone who is both powerful and not unfair, then Jarvis is wooden. | Ron is outrageous. | neutral |
Ron is unfair.
Sophia is outrageous.
Buck is unfair.
Sherlock is not angry.
Kiefer is not powerful.
Sherlock is not powerful.
Charlie is unfair.
Sherlock is outrageous.
Buck is powerful.
Jarvis is not powerful.
Sherlock is not obnoxious.
Buck is angry.If there is at least one people who is outrageous, then Jarvis is not unfair.
If someone is not powerful or unfair, then he is not wooden.
If there is someone who is either not obnoxious or not outrageous, then Sherlock is powerful and Sherlock is angry.
If there is at least one people who is not outrageous, then Buck is not wooden.
If Sophia is not unfair, then Sherlock is not obnoxious, and vice versa.
Someone who is not unfair is always both not outrageous and obnoxious.
Charlie being not outrageous is equivalent to Jarvis being obnoxious.
Someone being both not powerful and outrageous is equivalent to being obnoxious.
It can be concluded that Buck is not angry once knowing that Sophia is outrageous and Kiefer is powerful.
If someone is not outrageous and powerful, then he is both not obnoxious and unfair, and vice versa.
If someone who is not outrageous is also not angry, then he is not wooden.
If there is someone who is both powerful and not unfair, then Jarvis is wooden. | Sophia is not outrageous. | self_contradiction |
Ron is unfair.
Sophia is outrageous.
Buck is unfair.
Sherlock is not angry.
Kiefer is not powerful.
Sherlock is not powerful.
Charlie is unfair.
Sherlock is outrageous.
Buck is powerful.
Jarvis is not powerful.
Sherlock is not obnoxious.
Buck is angry.If there is at least one people who is outrageous, then Jarvis is not unfair.
If someone is not powerful or unfair, then he is not wooden.
If there is someone who is either not obnoxious or not outrageous, then Sherlock is powerful and Sherlock is angry.
If there is at least one people who is not outrageous, then Buck is not wooden.
If Sophia is not unfair, then Sherlock is not obnoxious, and vice versa.
Someone who is not unfair is always both not outrageous and obnoxious.
Charlie being not outrageous is equivalent to Jarvis being obnoxious.
Someone being both not powerful and outrageous is equivalent to being obnoxious.
It can be concluded that Buck is not angry once knowing that Sophia is outrageous and Kiefer is powerful.
If someone is not outrageous and powerful, then he is both not obnoxious and unfair, and vice versa.
If someone who is not outrageous is also not angry, then he is not wooden.
If there is someone who is both powerful and not unfair, then Jarvis is wooden. | Sherlock is not wooden. | entailment |
Ron is unfair.
Sophia is outrageous.
Buck is unfair.
Sherlock is not angry.
Kiefer is not powerful.
Sherlock is not powerful.
Charlie is unfair.
Sherlock is outrageous.
Buck is powerful.
Jarvis is not powerful.
Sherlock is not obnoxious.
Buck is angry.If there is at least one people who is outrageous, then Jarvis is not unfair.
If someone is not powerful or unfair, then he is not wooden.
If there is someone who is either not obnoxious or not outrageous, then Sherlock is powerful and Sherlock is angry.
If there is at least one people who is not outrageous, then Buck is not wooden.
If Sophia is not unfair, then Sherlock is not obnoxious, and vice versa.
Someone who is not unfair is always both not outrageous and obnoxious.
Charlie being not outrageous is equivalent to Jarvis being obnoxious.
Someone being both not powerful and outrageous is equivalent to being obnoxious.
It can be concluded that Buck is not angry once knowing that Sophia is outrageous and Kiefer is powerful.
If someone is not outrageous and powerful, then he is both not obnoxious and unfair, and vice versa.
If someone who is not outrageous is also not angry, then he is not wooden.
If there is someone who is both powerful and not unfair, then Jarvis is wooden. | Sophia is not obnoxious. | contradiction |
Ron is unfair.
Sophia is outrageous.
Buck is unfair.
Sherlock is not angry.
Kiefer is not powerful.
Sherlock is not powerful.
Charlie is unfair.
Sherlock is outrageous.
Buck is powerful.
Jarvis is not powerful.
Sherlock is not obnoxious.
Buck is angry.If there is at least one people who is outrageous, then Jarvis is not unfair.
If someone is not powerful or unfair, then he is not wooden.
If there is someone who is either not obnoxious or not outrageous, then Sherlock is powerful and Sherlock is angry.
If there is at least one people who is not outrageous, then Buck is not wooden.
If Sophia is not unfair, then Sherlock is not obnoxious, and vice versa.
Someone who is not unfair is always both not outrageous and obnoxious.
Charlie being not outrageous is equivalent to Jarvis being obnoxious.
Someone being both not powerful and outrageous is equivalent to being obnoxious.
It can be concluded that Buck is not angry once knowing that Sophia is outrageous and Kiefer is powerful.
If someone is not outrageous and powerful, then he is both not obnoxious and unfair, and vice versa.
If someone who is not outrageous is also not angry, then he is not wooden.
If there is someone who is both powerful and not unfair, then Jarvis is wooden. | Sherlock is not outrageous. | contradiction |
Ron is unfair.
Sophia is outrageous.
Buck is unfair.
Sherlock is not angry.
Kiefer is not powerful.
Sherlock is not powerful.
Charlie is unfair.
Sherlock is outrageous.
Buck is powerful.
Jarvis is not powerful.
Sherlock is not obnoxious.
Buck is angry.If there is at least one people who is outrageous, then Jarvis is not unfair.
If someone is not powerful or unfair, then he is not wooden.
If there is someone who is either not obnoxious or not outrageous, then Sherlock is powerful and Sherlock is angry.
If there is at least one people who is not outrageous, then Buck is not wooden.
If Sophia is not unfair, then Sherlock is not obnoxious, and vice versa.
Someone who is not unfair is always both not outrageous and obnoxious.
Charlie being not outrageous is equivalent to Jarvis being obnoxious.
Someone being both not powerful and outrageous is equivalent to being obnoxious.
It can be concluded that Buck is not angry once knowing that Sophia is outrageous and Kiefer is powerful.
If someone is not outrageous and powerful, then he is both not obnoxious and unfair, and vice versa.
If someone who is not outrageous is also not angry, then he is not wooden.
If there is someone who is both powerful and not unfair, then Jarvis is wooden. | Sherlock is not obnoxious. | self_contradiction |
Ron is unfair.
Sophia is outrageous.
Buck is unfair.
Sherlock is not angry.
Kiefer is not powerful.
Sherlock is not powerful.
Charlie is unfair.
Sherlock is outrageous.
Buck is powerful.
Jarvis is not powerful.
Sherlock is not obnoxious.
Buck is angry.If there is at least one people who is outrageous, then Jarvis is not unfair.
If someone is not powerful or unfair, then he is not wooden.
If there is someone who is either not obnoxious or not outrageous, then Sherlock is powerful and Sherlock is angry.
If there is at least one people who is not outrageous, then Buck is not wooden.
If Sophia is not unfair, then Sherlock is not obnoxious, and vice versa.
Someone who is not unfair is always both not outrageous and obnoxious.
Charlie being not outrageous is equivalent to Jarvis being obnoxious.
Someone being both not powerful and outrageous is equivalent to being obnoxious.
It can be concluded that Buck is not angry once knowing that Sophia is outrageous and Kiefer is powerful.
If someone is not outrageous and powerful, then he is both not obnoxious and unfair, and vice versa.
If someone who is not outrageous is also not angry, then he is not wooden.
If there is someone who is both powerful and not unfair, then Jarvis is wooden. | Buck is not outrageous. | neutral |
Ron is unfair.
Sophia is outrageous.
Buck is unfair.
Sherlock is not angry.
Kiefer is not powerful.
Sherlock is not powerful.
Charlie is unfair.
Sherlock is outrageous.
Buck is powerful.
Jarvis is not powerful.
Sherlock is not obnoxious.
Buck is angry.If there is at least one people who is outrageous, then Jarvis is not unfair.
If someone is not powerful or unfair, then he is not wooden.
If there is someone who is either not obnoxious or not outrageous, then Sherlock is powerful and Sherlock is angry.
If there is at least one people who is not outrageous, then Buck is not wooden.
If Sophia is not unfair, then Sherlock is not obnoxious, and vice versa.
Someone who is not unfair is always both not outrageous and obnoxious.
Charlie being not outrageous is equivalent to Jarvis being obnoxious.
Someone being both not powerful and outrageous is equivalent to being obnoxious.
It can be concluded that Buck is not angry once knowing that Sophia is outrageous and Kiefer is powerful.
If someone is not outrageous and powerful, then he is both not obnoxious and unfair, and vice versa.
If someone who is not outrageous is also not angry, then he is not wooden.
If there is someone who is both powerful and not unfair, then Jarvis is wooden. | Kiefer is not obnoxious. | neutral |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.