premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Sherard is not global.
Sterling is not traditional.
Eunice is traditional.
Sherard is bad.
Lucille is bad.
Sherard is not shy.
Milton is traditional.
Samson is not bad.
Eunice is not global.
Sherard is not beige.
Eunice is not bad.
Sherard is not careful.If someone is both not bad and shy, then he is careful.
If someone who is not traditional is also not beige, then he is bad.
Someone being beige is equivalent to being not bad.
If someone is not bad, then he is not global, and vice versa.
If Samson is not bad and Samson is not beige, then Eunice is not traditional.
If there is at least one people who is careful, then Lucille is beige and Sherard is shy.
Someone who is beige is always both not traditional and not bad.
If there is someone who is both shy and beige, then Sterling is not bad and Eunice is global.
It can be concluded that Sherard is not global once knowing that Sherard is traditional.
Someone is not beige and bad if and only if he is not careful and global.
Eunice being not beige implies that Sterling is not traditional.
If there is at least one people who is both bad and careful, then Sherard is global. | Samson is not bad. | entailment |
Sherard is not global.
Sterling is not traditional.
Eunice is traditional.
Sherard is bad.
Lucille is bad.
Sherard is not shy.
Milton is traditional.
Samson is not bad.
Eunice is not global.
Sherard is not beige.
Eunice is not bad.
Sherard is not careful.If someone is both not bad and shy, then he is careful.
If someone who is not traditional is also not beige, then he is bad.
Someone being beige is equivalent to being not bad.
If someone is not bad, then he is not global, and vice versa.
If Samson is not bad and Samson is not beige, then Eunice is not traditional.
If there is at least one people who is careful, then Lucille is beige and Sherard is shy.
Someone who is beige is always both not traditional and not bad.
If there is someone who is both shy and beige, then Sterling is not bad and Eunice is global.
It can be concluded that Sherard is not global once knowing that Sherard is traditional.
Someone is not beige and bad if and only if he is not careful and global.
Eunice being not beige implies that Sterling is not traditional.
If there is at least one people who is both bad and careful, then Sherard is global. | Eunice is bad. | contradiction |
Sherard is not global.
Sterling is not traditional.
Eunice is traditional.
Sherard is bad.
Lucille is bad.
Sherard is not shy.
Milton is traditional.
Samson is not bad.
Eunice is not global.
Sherard is not beige.
Eunice is not bad.
Sherard is not careful.If someone is both not bad and shy, then he is careful.
If someone who is not traditional is also not beige, then he is bad.
Someone being beige is equivalent to being not bad.
If someone is not bad, then he is not global, and vice versa.
If Samson is not bad and Samson is not beige, then Eunice is not traditional.
If there is at least one people who is careful, then Lucille is beige and Sherard is shy.
Someone who is beige is always both not traditional and not bad.
If there is someone who is both shy and beige, then Sterling is not bad and Eunice is global.
It can be concluded that Sherard is not global once knowing that Sherard is traditional.
Someone is not beige and bad if and only if he is not careful and global.
Eunice being not beige implies that Sterling is not traditional.
If there is at least one people who is both bad and careful, then Sherard is global. | Sidney is careful. | neutral |
Sherard is not global.
Sterling is not traditional.
Eunice is traditional.
Sherard is bad.
Lucille is bad.
Sherard is not shy.
Milton is traditional.
Samson is not bad.
Eunice is not global.
Sherard is not beige.
Eunice is not bad.
Sherard is not careful.If someone is both not bad and shy, then he is careful.
If someone who is not traditional is also not beige, then he is bad.
Someone being beige is equivalent to being not bad.
If someone is not bad, then he is not global, and vice versa.
If Samson is not bad and Samson is not beige, then Eunice is not traditional.
If there is at least one people who is careful, then Lucille is beige and Sherard is shy.
Someone who is beige is always both not traditional and not bad.
If there is someone who is both shy and beige, then Sterling is not bad and Eunice is global.
It can be concluded that Sherard is not global once knowing that Sherard is traditional.
Someone is not beige and bad if and only if he is not careful and global.
Eunice being not beige implies that Sterling is not traditional.
If there is at least one people who is both bad and careful, then Sherard is global. | Milton is not bad. | neutral |
Sherard is not global.
Sterling is not traditional.
Eunice is traditional.
Sherard is bad.
Lucille is bad.
Sherard is not shy.
Milton is traditional.
Samson is not bad.
Eunice is not global.
Sherard is not beige.
Eunice is not bad.
Sherard is not careful.If someone is both not bad and shy, then he is careful.
If someone who is not traditional is also not beige, then he is bad.
Someone being beige is equivalent to being not bad.
If someone is not bad, then he is not global, and vice versa.
If Samson is not bad and Samson is not beige, then Eunice is not traditional.
If there is at least one people who is careful, then Lucille is beige and Sherard is shy.
Someone who is beige is always both not traditional and not bad.
If there is someone who is both shy and beige, then Sterling is not bad and Eunice is global.
It can be concluded that Sherard is not global once knowing that Sherard is traditional.
Someone is not beige and bad if and only if he is not careful and global.
Eunice being not beige implies that Sterling is not traditional.
If there is at least one people who is both bad and careful, then Sherard is global. | Samson is not beige. | contradiction |
Sherard is not global.
Sterling is not traditional.
Eunice is traditional.
Sherard is bad.
Lucille is bad.
Sherard is not shy.
Milton is traditional.
Samson is not bad.
Eunice is not global.
Sherard is not beige.
Eunice is not bad.
Sherard is not careful.If someone is both not bad and shy, then he is careful.
If someone who is not traditional is also not beige, then he is bad.
Someone being beige is equivalent to being not bad.
If someone is not bad, then he is not global, and vice versa.
If Samson is not bad and Samson is not beige, then Eunice is not traditional.
If there is at least one people who is careful, then Lucille is beige and Sherard is shy.
Someone who is beige is always both not traditional and not bad.
If there is someone who is both shy and beige, then Sterling is not bad and Eunice is global.
It can be concluded that Sherard is not global once knowing that Sherard is traditional.
Someone is not beige and bad if and only if he is not careful and global.
Eunice being not beige implies that Sterling is not traditional.
If there is at least one people who is both bad and careful, then Sherard is global. | Sherard is careful. | contradiction |
Sherard is not global.
Sterling is not traditional.
Eunice is traditional.
Sherard is bad.
Lucille is bad.
Sherard is not shy.
Milton is traditional.
Samson is not bad.
Eunice is not global.
Sherard is not beige.
Eunice is not bad.
Sherard is not careful.If someone is both not bad and shy, then he is careful.
If someone who is not traditional is also not beige, then he is bad.
Someone being beige is equivalent to being not bad.
If someone is not bad, then he is not global, and vice versa.
If Samson is not bad and Samson is not beige, then Eunice is not traditional.
If there is at least one people who is careful, then Lucille is beige and Sherard is shy.
Someone who is beige is always both not traditional and not bad.
If there is someone who is both shy and beige, then Sterling is not bad and Eunice is global.
It can be concluded that Sherard is not global once knowing that Sherard is traditional.
Someone is not beige and bad if and only if he is not careful and global.
Eunice being not beige implies that Sterling is not traditional.
If there is at least one people who is both bad and careful, then Sherard is global. | Sherard is not beige. | self_contradiction |
Sherard is not global.
Sterling is not traditional.
Eunice is traditional.
Sherard is bad.
Lucille is bad.
Sherard is not shy.
Milton is traditional.
Samson is not bad.
Eunice is not global.
Sherard is not beige.
Eunice is not bad.
Sherard is not careful.If someone is both not bad and shy, then he is careful.
If someone who is not traditional is also not beige, then he is bad.
Someone being beige is equivalent to being not bad.
If someone is not bad, then he is not global, and vice versa.
If Samson is not bad and Samson is not beige, then Eunice is not traditional.
If there is at least one people who is careful, then Lucille is beige and Sherard is shy.
Someone who is beige is always both not traditional and not bad.
If there is someone who is both shy and beige, then Sterling is not bad and Eunice is global.
It can be concluded that Sherard is not global once knowing that Sherard is traditional.
Someone is not beige and bad if and only if he is not careful and global.
Eunice being not beige implies that Sterling is not traditional.
If there is at least one people who is both bad and careful, then Sherard is global. | Sherard is bad. | self_contradiction |
Sherard is not global.
Sterling is not traditional.
Eunice is traditional.
Sherard is bad.
Lucille is bad.
Sherard is not shy.
Milton is traditional.
Samson is not bad.
Eunice is not global.
Sherard is not beige.
Eunice is not bad.
Sherard is not careful.If someone is both not bad and shy, then he is careful.
If someone who is not traditional is also not beige, then he is bad.
Someone being beige is equivalent to being not bad.
If someone is not bad, then he is not global, and vice versa.
If Samson is not bad and Samson is not beige, then Eunice is not traditional.
If there is at least one people who is careful, then Lucille is beige and Sherard is shy.
Someone who is beige is always both not traditional and not bad.
If there is someone who is both shy and beige, then Sterling is not bad and Eunice is global.
It can be concluded that Sherard is not global once knowing that Sherard is traditional.
Someone is not beige and bad if and only if he is not careful and global.
Eunice being not beige implies that Sterling is not traditional.
If there is at least one people who is both bad and careful, then Sherard is global. | Sterling is shy. | neutral |
Sherard is not global.
Sterling is not traditional.
Eunice is traditional.
Sherard is bad.
Lucille is bad.
Sherard is not shy.
Milton is traditional.
Samson is not bad.
Eunice is not global.
Sherard is not beige.
Eunice is not bad.
Sherard is not careful.If someone is both not bad and shy, then he is careful.
If someone who is not traditional is also not beige, then he is bad.
Someone being beige is equivalent to being not bad.
If someone is not bad, then he is not global, and vice versa.
If Samson is not bad and Samson is not beige, then Eunice is not traditional.
If there is at least one people who is careful, then Lucille is beige and Sherard is shy.
Someone who is beige is always both not traditional and not bad.
If there is someone who is both shy and beige, then Sterling is not bad and Eunice is global.
It can be concluded that Sherard is not global once knowing that Sherard is traditional.
Someone is not beige and bad if and only if he is not careful and global.
Eunice being not beige implies that Sterling is not traditional.
If there is at least one people who is both bad and careful, then Sherard is global. | Eunice is global. | contradiction |
Sherard is not global.
Sterling is not traditional.
Eunice is traditional.
Sherard is bad.
Lucille is bad.
Sherard is not shy.
Milton is traditional.
Samson is not bad.
Eunice is not global.
Sherard is not beige.
Eunice is not bad.
Sherard is not careful.If someone is both not bad and shy, then he is careful.
If someone who is not traditional is also not beige, then he is bad.
Someone being beige is equivalent to being not bad.
If someone is not bad, then he is not global, and vice versa.
If Samson is not bad and Samson is not beige, then Eunice is not traditional.
If there is at least one people who is careful, then Lucille is beige and Sherard is shy.
Someone who is beige is always both not traditional and not bad.
If there is someone who is both shy and beige, then Sterling is not bad and Eunice is global.
It can be concluded that Sherard is not global once knowing that Sherard is traditional.
Someone is not beige and bad if and only if he is not careful and global.
Eunice being not beige implies that Sterling is not traditional.
If there is at least one people who is both bad and careful, then Sherard is global. | Eunice is not bad. | entailment |
Sherard is not global.
Sterling is not traditional.
Eunice is traditional.
Sherard is bad.
Lucille is bad.
Sherard is not shy.
Milton is traditional.
Samson is not bad.
Eunice is not global.
Sherard is not beige.
Eunice is not bad.
Sherard is not careful.If someone is both not bad and shy, then he is careful.
If someone who is not traditional is also not beige, then he is bad.
Someone being beige is equivalent to being not bad.
If someone is not bad, then he is not global, and vice versa.
If Samson is not bad and Samson is not beige, then Eunice is not traditional.
If there is at least one people who is careful, then Lucille is beige and Sherard is shy.
Someone who is beige is always both not traditional and not bad.
If there is someone who is both shy and beige, then Sterling is not bad and Eunice is global.
It can be concluded that Sherard is not global once knowing that Sherard is traditional.
Someone is not beige and bad if and only if he is not careful and global.
Eunice being not beige implies that Sterling is not traditional.
If there is at least one people who is both bad and careful, then Sherard is global. | Samson is not global. | entailment |
Sherard is not global.
Sterling is not traditional.
Eunice is traditional.
Sherard is bad.
Lucille is bad.
Sherard is not shy.
Milton is traditional.
Samson is not bad.
Eunice is not global.
Sherard is not beige.
Eunice is not bad.
Sherard is not careful.If someone is both not bad and shy, then he is careful.
If someone who is not traditional is also not beige, then he is bad.
Someone being beige is equivalent to being not bad.
If someone is not bad, then he is not global, and vice versa.
If Samson is not bad and Samson is not beige, then Eunice is not traditional.
If there is at least one people who is careful, then Lucille is beige and Sherard is shy.
Someone who is beige is always both not traditional and not bad.
If there is someone who is both shy and beige, then Sterling is not bad and Eunice is global.
It can be concluded that Sherard is not global once knowing that Sherard is traditional.
Someone is not beige and bad if and only if he is not careful and global.
Eunice being not beige implies that Sterling is not traditional.
If there is at least one people who is both bad and careful, then Sherard is global. | Samson is bad. | contradiction |
Sherard is not global.
Sterling is not traditional.
Eunice is traditional.
Sherard is bad.
Lucille is bad.
Sherard is not shy.
Milton is traditional.
Samson is not bad.
Eunice is not global.
Sherard is not beige.
Eunice is not bad.
Sherard is not careful.If someone is both not bad and shy, then he is careful.
If someone who is not traditional is also not beige, then he is bad.
Someone being beige is equivalent to being not bad.
If someone is not bad, then he is not global, and vice versa.
If Samson is not bad and Samson is not beige, then Eunice is not traditional.
If there is at least one people who is careful, then Lucille is beige and Sherard is shy.
Someone who is beige is always both not traditional and not bad.
If there is someone who is both shy and beige, then Sterling is not bad and Eunice is global.
It can be concluded that Sherard is not global once knowing that Sherard is traditional.
Someone is not beige and bad if and only if he is not careful and global.
Eunice being not beige implies that Sterling is not traditional.
If there is at least one people who is both bad and careful, then Sherard is global. | Sherard is global. | self_contradiction |
Sherard is not global.
Sterling is not traditional.
Eunice is traditional.
Sherard is bad.
Lucille is bad.
Sherard is not shy.
Milton is traditional.
Samson is not bad.
Eunice is not global.
Sherard is not beige.
Eunice is not bad.
Sherard is not careful.If someone is both not bad and shy, then he is careful.
If someone who is not traditional is also not beige, then he is bad.
Someone being beige is equivalent to being not bad.
If someone is not bad, then he is not global, and vice versa.
If Samson is not bad and Samson is not beige, then Eunice is not traditional.
If there is at least one people who is careful, then Lucille is beige and Sherard is shy.
Someone who is beige is always both not traditional and not bad.
If there is someone who is both shy and beige, then Sterling is not bad and Eunice is global.
It can be concluded that Sherard is not global once knowing that Sherard is traditional.
Someone is not beige and bad if and only if he is not careful and global.
Eunice being not beige implies that Sterling is not traditional.
If there is at least one people who is both bad and careful, then Sherard is global. | Lucille is not beige. | neutral |
Sherard is not global.
Sterling is not traditional.
Eunice is traditional.
Sherard is bad.
Lucille is bad.
Sherard is not shy.
Milton is traditional.
Samson is not bad.
Eunice is not global.
Sherard is not beige.
Eunice is not bad.
Sherard is not careful.If someone is both not bad and shy, then he is careful.
If someone who is not traditional is also not beige, then he is bad.
Someone being beige is equivalent to being not bad.
If someone is not bad, then he is not global, and vice versa.
If Samson is not bad and Samson is not beige, then Eunice is not traditional.
If there is at least one people who is careful, then Lucille is beige and Sherard is shy.
Someone who is beige is always both not traditional and not bad.
If there is someone who is both shy and beige, then Sterling is not bad and Eunice is global.
It can be concluded that Sherard is not global once knowing that Sherard is traditional.
Someone is not beige and bad if and only if he is not careful and global.
Eunice being not beige implies that Sterling is not traditional.
If there is at least one people who is both bad and careful, then Sherard is global. | Samson is careful. | neutral |
Sherard is not global.
Sterling is not traditional.
Eunice is traditional.
Sherard is bad.
Lucille is bad.
Sherard is not shy.
Milton is traditional.
Samson is not bad.
Eunice is not global.
Sherard is not beige.
Eunice is not bad.
Sherard is not careful.If someone is both not bad and shy, then he is careful.
If someone who is not traditional is also not beige, then he is bad.
Someone being beige is equivalent to being not bad.
If someone is not bad, then he is not global, and vice versa.
If Samson is not bad and Samson is not beige, then Eunice is not traditional.
If there is at least one people who is careful, then Lucille is beige and Sherard is shy.
Someone who is beige is always both not traditional and not bad.
If there is someone who is both shy and beige, then Sterling is not bad and Eunice is global.
It can be concluded that Sherard is not global once knowing that Sherard is traditional.
Someone is not beige and bad if and only if he is not careful and global.
Eunice being not beige implies that Sterling is not traditional.
If there is at least one people who is both bad and careful, then Sherard is global. | Eunice is not traditional. | self_contradiction |
Sherard is not global.
Sterling is not traditional.
Eunice is traditional.
Sherard is bad.
Lucille is bad.
Sherard is not shy.
Milton is traditional.
Samson is not bad.
Eunice is not global.
Sherard is not beige.
Eunice is not bad.
Sherard is not careful.If someone is both not bad and shy, then he is careful.
If someone who is not traditional is also not beige, then he is bad.
Someone being beige is equivalent to being not bad.
If someone is not bad, then he is not global, and vice versa.
If Samson is not bad and Samson is not beige, then Eunice is not traditional.
If there is at least one people who is careful, then Lucille is beige and Sherard is shy.
Someone who is beige is always both not traditional and not bad.
If there is someone who is both shy and beige, then Sterling is not bad and Eunice is global.
It can be concluded that Sherard is not global once knowing that Sherard is traditional.
Someone is not beige and bad if and only if he is not careful and global.
Eunice being not beige implies that Sterling is not traditional.
If there is at least one people who is both bad and careful, then Sherard is global. | Samson is beige. | entailment |
Sherard is not global.
Sterling is not traditional.
Eunice is traditional.
Sherard is bad.
Lucille is bad.
Sherard is not shy.
Milton is traditional.
Samson is not bad.
Eunice is not global.
Sherard is not beige.
Eunice is not bad.
Sherard is not careful.If someone is both not bad and shy, then he is careful.
If someone who is not traditional is also not beige, then he is bad.
Someone being beige is equivalent to being not bad.
If someone is not bad, then he is not global, and vice versa.
If Samson is not bad and Samson is not beige, then Eunice is not traditional.
If there is at least one people who is careful, then Lucille is beige and Sherard is shy.
Someone who is beige is always both not traditional and not bad.
If there is someone who is both shy and beige, then Sterling is not bad and Eunice is global.
It can be concluded that Sherard is not global once knowing that Sherard is traditional.
Someone is not beige and bad if and only if he is not careful and global.
Eunice being not beige implies that Sterling is not traditional.
If there is at least one people who is both bad and careful, then Sherard is global. | Sherard is not bad. | self_contradiction |
Sherard is not global.
Sterling is not traditional.
Eunice is traditional.
Sherard is bad.
Lucille is bad.
Sherard is not shy.
Milton is traditional.
Samson is not bad.
Eunice is not global.
Sherard is not beige.
Eunice is not bad.
Sherard is not careful.If someone is both not bad and shy, then he is careful.
If someone who is not traditional is also not beige, then he is bad.
Someone being beige is equivalent to being not bad.
If someone is not bad, then he is not global, and vice versa.
If Samson is not bad and Samson is not beige, then Eunice is not traditional.
If there is at least one people who is careful, then Lucille is beige and Sherard is shy.
Someone who is beige is always both not traditional and not bad.
If there is someone who is both shy and beige, then Sterling is not bad and Eunice is global.
It can be concluded that Sherard is not global once knowing that Sherard is traditional.
Someone is not beige and bad if and only if he is not careful and global.
Eunice being not beige implies that Sterling is not traditional.
If there is at least one people who is both bad and careful, then Sherard is global. | Sherard is not traditional. | entailment |
Lucy is crazy.
Douglas is not open.
Homer is elated.
Lucy is excited.
Stewart is elated.
Lucy is not open.
Lucy is outrageous.
Homer is not excited.
Homer is open.
Stewart is excited.
Stewart is not outrageous.
Samson is not open.If there is someone who is either not open or not plastic, then Lucy is elated and Kendall is not outrageous.
Homer being not elated or Homer being plastic implies that Kendall is excited.
If there is someone who is both crazy and outrageous, then Douglas is not open.
If someone who is not outrageous is also plastic, then he is not elated.
If Samson is open, then Lucy is not crazy and Stewart is elated, and vice versa.
Douglas being plastic is equivalent to Alexia being open and Samson being not excited.
If all people are elated, then Stewart is not crazy and Douglas is excited.
If there is at least one people who is not crazy, then Kendall is outrageous.
As long as someone is either crazy or not elated, he is plastic and excited.
Someone who is not outrageous is always not plastic.
If Douglas is not crazy, then Stewart is open, and vice versa.
If someone is crazy, then he is both not excited and not outrageous. | Samson is open. | contradiction |
Lucy is crazy.
Douglas is not open.
Homer is elated.
Lucy is excited.
Stewart is elated.
Lucy is not open.
Lucy is outrageous.
Homer is not excited.
Homer is open.
Stewart is excited.
Stewart is not outrageous.
Samson is not open.If there is someone who is either not open or not plastic, then Lucy is elated and Kendall is not outrageous.
Homer being not elated or Homer being plastic implies that Kendall is excited.
If there is someone who is both crazy and outrageous, then Douglas is not open.
If someone who is not outrageous is also plastic, then he is not elated.
If Samson is open, then Lucy is not crazy and Stewart is elated, and vice versa.
Douglas being plastic is equivalent to Alexia being open and Samson being not excited.
If all people are elated, then Stewart is not crazy and Douglas is excited.
If there is at least one people who is not crazy, then Kendall is outrageous.
As long as someone is either crazy or not elated, he is plastic and excited.
Someone who is not outrageous is always not plastic.
If Douglas is not crazy, then Stewart is open, and vice versa.
If someone is crazy, then he is both not excited and not outrageous. | Lucy is outrageous. | self_contradiction |
Lucy is crazy.
Douglas is not open.
Homer is elated.
Lucy is excited.
Stewart is elated.
Lucy is not open.
Lucy is outrageous.
Homer is not excited.
Homer is open.
Stewart is excited.
Stewart is not outrageous.
Samson is not open.If there is someone who is either not open or not plastic, then Lucy is elated and Kendall is not outrageous.
Homer being not elated or Homer being plastic implies that Kendall is excited.
If there is someone who is both crazy and outrageous, then Douglas is not open.
If someone who is not outrageous is also plastic, then he is not elated.
If Samson is open, then Lucy is not crazy and Stewart is elated, and vice versa.
Douglas being plastic is equivalent to Alexia being open and Samson being not excited.
If all people are elated, then Stewart is not crazy and Douglas is excited.
If there is at least one people who is not crazy, then Kendall is outrageous.
As long as someone is either crazy or not elated, he is plastic and excited.
Someone who is not outrageous is always not plastic.
If Douglas is not crazy, then Stewart is open, and vice versa.
If someone is crazy, then he is both not excited and not outrageous. | Homer is open. | entailment |
Lucy is crazy.
Douglas is not open.
Homer is elated.
Lucy is excited.
Stewart is elated.
Lucy is not open.
Lucy is outrageous.
Homer is not excited.
Homer is open.
Stewart is excited.
Stewart is not outrageous.
Samson is not open.If there is someone who is either not open or not plastic, then Lucy is elated and Kendall is not outrageous.
Homer being not elated or Homer being plastic implies that Kendall is excited.
If there is someone who is both crazy and outrageous, then Douglas is not open.
If someone who is not outrageous is also plastic, then he is not elated.
If Samson is open, then Lucy is not crazy and Stewart is elated, and vice versa.
Douglas being plastic is equivalent to Alexia being open and Samson being not excited.
If all people are elated, then Stewart is not crazy and Douglas is excited.
If there is at least one people who is not crazy, then Kendall is outrageous.
As long as someone is either crazy or not elated, he is plastic and excited.
Someone who is not outrageous is always not plastic.
If Douglas is not crazy, then Stewart is open, and vice versa.
If someone is crazy, then he is both not excited and not outrageous. | Kendall is open. | neutral |
Lucy is crazy.
Douglas is not open.
Homer is elated.
Lucy is excited.
Stewart is elated.
Lucy is not open.
Lucy is outrageous.
Homer is not excited.
Homer is open.
Stewart is excited.
Stewart is not outrageous.
Samson is not open.If there is someone who is either not open or not plastic, then Lucy is elated and Kendall is not outrageous.
Homer being not elated or Homer being plastic implies that Kendall is excited.
If there is someone who is both crazy and outrageous, then Douglas is not open.
If someone who is not outrageous is also plastic, then he is not elated.
If Samson is open, then Lucy is not crazy and Stewart is elated, and vice versa.
Douglas being plastic is equivalent to Alexia being open and Samson being not excited.
If all people are elated, then Stewart is not crazy and Douglas is excited.
If there is at least one people who is not crazy, then Kendall is outrageous.
As long as someone is either crazy or not elated, he is plastic and excited.
Someone who is not outrageous is always not plastic.
If Douglas is not crazy, then Stewart is open, and vice versa.
If someone is crazy, then he is both not excited and not outrageous. | Alexia is outrageous. | neutral |
Lucy is crazy.
Douglas is not open.
Homer is elated.
Lucy is excited.
Stewart is elated.
Lucy is not open.
Lucy is outrageous.
Homer is not excited.
Homer is open.
Stewart is excited.
Stewart is not outrageous.
Samson is not open.If there is someone who is either not open or not plastic, then Lucy is elated and Kendall is not outrageous.
Homer being not elated or Homer being plastic implies that Kendall is excited.
If there is someone who is both crazy and outrageous, then Douglas is not open.
If someone who is not outrageous is also plastic, then he is not elated.
If Samson is open, then Lucy is not crazy and Stewart is elated, and vice versa.
Douglas being plastic is equivalent to Alexia being open and Samson being not excited.
If all people are elated, then Stewart is not crazy and Douglas is excited.
If there is at least one people who is not crazy, then Kendall is outrageous.
As long as someone is either crazy or not elated, he is plastic and excited.
Someone who is not outrageous is always not plastic.
If Douglas is not crazy, then Stewart is open, and vice versa.
If someone is crazy, then he is both not excited and not outrageous. | Stewart is not elated. | contradiction |
Lucy is crazy.
Douglas is not open.
Homer is elated.
Lucy is excited.
Stewart is elated.
Lucy is not open.
Lucy is outrageous.
Homer is not excited.
Homer is open.
Stewart is excited.
Stewart is not outrageous.
Samson is not open.If there is someone who is either not open or not plastic, then Lucy is elated and Kendall is not outrageous.
Homer being not elated or Homer being plastic implies that Kendall is excited.
If there is someone who is both crazy and outrageous, then Douglas is not open.
If someone who is not outrageous is also plastic, then he is not elated.
If Samson is open, then Lucy is not crazy and Stewart is elated, and vice versa.
Douglas being plastic is equivalent to Alexia being open and Samson being not excited.
If all people are elated, then Stewart is not crazy and Douglas is excited.
If there is at least one people who is not crazy, then Kendall is outrageous.
As long as someone is either crazy or not elated, he is plastic and excited.
Someone who is not outrageous is always not plastic.
If Douglas is not crazy, then Stewart is open, and vice versa.
If someone is crazy, then he is both not excited and not outrageous. | Kendall is outrageous. | contradiction |
Lucy is crazy.
Douglas is not open.
Homer is elated.
Lucy is excited.
Stewart is elated.
Lucy is not open.
Lucy is outrageous.
Homer is not excited.
Homer is open.
Stewart is excited.
Stewart is not outrageous.
Samson is not open.If there is someone who is either not open or not plastic, then Lucy is elated and Kendall is not outrageous.
Homer being not elated or Homer being plastic implies that Kendall is excited.
If there is someone who is both crazy and outrageous, then Douglas is not open.
If someone who is not outrageous is also plastic, then he is not elated.
If Samson is open, then Lucy is not crazy and Stewart is elated, and vice versa.
Douglas being plastic is equivalent to Alexia being open and Samson being not excited.
If all people are elated, then Stewart is not crazy and Douglas is excited.
If there is at least one people who is not crazy, then Kendall is outrageous.
As long as someone is either crazy or not elated, he is plastic and excited.
Someone who is not outrageous is always not plastic.
If Douglas is not crazy, then Stewart is open, and vice versa.
If someone is crazy, then he is both not excited and not outrageous. | Lucy is open. | contradiction |
Lucy is crazy.
Douglas is not open.
Homer is elated.
Lucy is excited.
Stewart is elated.
Lucy is not open.
Lucy is outrageous.
Homer is not excited.
Homer is open.
Stewart is excited.
Stewart is not outrageous.
Samson is not open.If there is someone who is either not open or not plastic, then Lucy is elated and Kendall is not outrageous.
Homer being not elated or Homer being plastic implies that Kendall is excited.
If there is someone who is both crazy and outrageous, then Douglas is not open.
If someone who is not outrageous is also plastic, then he is not elated.
If Samson is open, then Lucy is not crazy and Stewart is elated, and vice versa.
Douglas being plastic is equivalent to Alexia being open and Samson being not excited.
If all people are elated, then Stewart is not crazy and Douglas is excited.
If there is at least one people who is not crazy, then Kendall is outrageous.
As long as someone is either crazy or not elated, he is plastic and excited.
Someone who is not outrageous is always not plastic.
If Douglas is not crazy, then Stewart is open, and vice versa.
If someone is crazy, then he is both not excited and not outrageous. | Lucy is excited. | self_contradiction |
Lucy is crazy.
Douglas is not open.
Homer is elated.
Lucy is excited.
Stewart is elated.
Lucy is not open.
Lucy is outrageous.
Homer is not excited.
Homer is open.
Stewart is excited.
Stewart is not outrageous.
Samson is not open.If there is someone who is either not open or not plastic, then Lucy is elated and Kendall is not outrageous.
Homer being not elated or Homer being plastic implies that Kendall is excited.
If there is someone who is both crazy and outrageous, then Douglas is not open.
If someone who is not outrageous is also plastic, then he is not elated.
If Samson is open, then Lucy is not crazy and Stewart is elated, and vice versa.
Douglas being plastic is equivalent to Alexia being open and Samson being not excited.
If all people are elated, then Stewart is not crazy and Douglas is excited.
If there is at least one people who is not crazy, then Kendall is outrageous.
As long as someone is either crazy or not elated, he is plastic and excited.
Someone who is not outrageous is always not plastic.
If Douglas is not crazy, then Stewart is open, and vice versa.
If someone is crazy, then he is both not excited and not outrageous. | Douglas is not open. | entailment |
Lucy is crazy.
Douglas is not open.
Homer is elated.
Lucy is excited.
Stewart is elated.
Lucy is not open.
Lucy is outrageous.
Homer is not excited.
Homer is open.
Stewart is excited.
Stewart is not outrageous.
Samson is not open.If there is someone who is either not open or not plastic, then Lucy is elated and Kendall is not outrageous.
Homer being not elated or Homer being plastic implies that Kendall is excited.
If there is someone who is both crazy and outrageous, then Douglas is not open.
If someone who is not outrageous is also plastic, then he is not elated.
If Samson is open, then Lucy is not crazy and Stewart is elated, and vice versa.
Douglas being plastic is equivalent to Alexia being open and Samson being not excited.
If all people are elated, then Stewart is not crazy and Douglas is excited.
If there is at least one people who is not crazy, then Kendall is outrageous.
As long as someone is either crazy or not elated, he is plastic and excited.
Someone who is not outrageous is always not plastic.
If Douglas is not crazy, then Stewart is open, and vice versa.
If someone is crazy, then he is both not excited and not outrageous. | Stewart is not plastic. | entailment |
Lucy is crazy.
Douglas is not open.
Homer is elated.
Lucy is excited.
Stewart is elated.
Lucy is not open.
Lucy is outrageous.
Homer is not excited.
Homer is open.
Stewart is excited.
Stewart is not outrageous.
Samson is not open.If there is someone who is either not open or not plastic, then Lucy is elated and Kendall is not outrageous.
Homer being not elated or Homer being plastic implies that Kendall is excited.
If there is someone who is both crazy and outrageous, then Douglas is not open.
If someone who is not outrageous is also plastic, then he is not elated.
If Samson is open, then Lucy is not crazy and Stewart is elated, and vice versa.
Douglas being plastic is equivalent to Alexia being open and Samson being not excited.
If all people are elated, then Stewart is not crazy and Douglas is excited.
If there is at least one people who is not crazy, then Kendall is outrageous.
As long as someone is either crazy or not elated, he is plastic and excited.
Someone who is not outrageous is always not plastic.
If Douglas is not crazy, then Stewart is open, and vice versa.
If someone is crazy, then he is both not excited and not outrageous. | Samson is outrageous. | neutral |
Lucy is crazy.
Douglas is not open.
Homer is elated.
Lucy is excited.
Stewart is elated.
Lucy is not open.
Lucy is outrageous.
Homer is not excited.
Homer is open.
Stewart is excited.
Stewart is not outrageous.
Samson is not open.If there is someone who is either not open or not plastic, then Lucy is elated and Kendall is not outrageous.
Homer being not elated or Homer being plastic implies that Kendall is excited.
If there is someone who is both crazy and outrageous, then Douglas is not open.
If someone who is not outrageous is also plastic, then he is not elated.
If Samson is open, then Lucy is not crazy and Stewart is elated, and vice versa.
Douglas being plastic is equivalent to Alexia being open and Samson being not excited.
If all people are elated, then Stewart is not crazy and Douglas is excited.
If there is at least one people who is not crazy, then Kendall is outrageous.
As long as someone is either crazy or not elated, he is plastic and excited.
Someone who is not outrageous is always not plastic.
If Douglas is not crazy, then Stewart is open, and vice versa.
If someone is crazy, then he is both not excited and not outrageous. | Homer is not elated. | contradiction |
Lucy is crazy.
Douglas is not open.
Homer is elated.
Lucy is excited.
Stewart is elated.
Lucy is not open.
Lucy is outrageous.
Homer is not excited.
Homer is open.
Stewart is excited.
Stewart is not outrageous.
Samson is not open.If there is someone who is either not open or not plastic, then Lucy is elated and Kendall is not outrageous.
Homer being not elated or Homer being plastic implies that Kendall is excited.
If there is someone who is both crazy and outrageous, then Douglas is not open.
If someone who is not outrageous is also plastic, then he is not elated.
If Samson is open, then Lucy is not crazy and Stewart is elated, and vice versa.
Douglas being plastic is equivalent to Alexia being open and Samson being not excited.
If all people are elated, then Stewart is not crazy and Douglas is excited.
If there is at least one people who is not crazy, then Kendall is outrageous.
As long as someone is either crazy or not elated, he is plastic and excited.
Someone who is not outrageous is always not plastic.
If Douglas is not crazy, then Stewart is open, and vice versa.
If someone is crazy, then he is both not excited and not outrageous. | Lucy is not plastic. | self_contradiction |
Lucy is crazy.
Douglas is not open.
Homer is elated.
Lucy is excited.
Stewart is elated.
Lucy is not open.
Lucy is outrageous.
Homer is not excited.
Homer is open.
Stewart is excited.
Stewart is not outrageous.
Samson is not open.If there is someone who is either not open or not plastic, then Lucy is elated and Kendall is not outrageous.
Homer being not elated or Homer being plastic implies that Kendall is excited.
If there is someone who is both crazy and outrageous, then Douglas is not open.
If someone who is not outrageous is also plastic, then he is not elated.
If Samson is open, then Lucy is not crazy and Stewart is elated, and vice versa.
Douglas being plastic is equivalent to Alexia being open and Samson being not excited.
If all people are elated, then Stewart is not crazy and Douglas is excited.
If there is at least one people who is not crazy, then Kendall is outrageous.
As long as someone is either crazy or not elated, he is plastic and excited.
Someone who is not outrageous is always not plastic.
If Douglas is not crazy, then Stewart is open, and vice versa.
If someone is crazy, then he is both not excited and not outrageous. | Stewart is not crazy. | neutral |
Lucy is crazy.
Douglas is not open.
Homer is elated.
Lucy is excited.
Stewart is elated.
Lucy is not open.
Lucy is outrageous.
Homer is not excited.
Homer is open.
Stewart is excited.
Stewart is not outrageous.
Samson is not open.If there is someone who is either not open or not plastic, then Lucy is elated and Kendall is not outrageous.
Homer being not elated or Homer being plastic implies that Kendall is excited.
If there is someone who is both crazy and outrageous, then Douglas is not open.
If someone who is not outrageous is also plastic, then he is not elated.
If Samson is open, then Lucy is not crazy and Stewart is elated, and vice versa.
Douglas being plastic is equivalent to Alexia being open and Samson being not excited.
If all people are elated, then Stewart is not crazy and Douglas is excited.
If there is at least one people who is not crazy, then Kendall is outrageous.
As long as someone is either crazy or not elated, he is plastic and excited.
Someone who is not outrageous is always not plastic.
If Douglas is not crazy, then Stewart is open, and vice versa.
If someone is crazy, then he is both not excited and not outrageous. | Kendall is not plastic. | entailment |
Lucy is crazy.
Douglas is not open.
Homer is elated.
Lucy is excited.
Stewart is elated.
Lucy is not open.
Lucy is outrageous.
Homer is not excited.
Homer is open.
Stewart is excited.
Stewart is not outrageous.
Samson is not open.If there is someone who is either not open or not plastic, then Lucy is elated and Kendall is not outrageous.
Homer being not elated or Homer being plastic implies that Kendall is excited.
If there is someone who is both crazy and outrageous, then Douglas is not open.
If someone who is not outrageous is also plastic, then he is not elated.
If Samson is open, then Lucy is not crazy and Stewart is elated, and vice versa.
Douglas being plastic is equivalent to Alexia being open and Samson being not excited.
If all people are elated, then Stewart is not crazy and Douglas is excited.
If there is at least one people who is not crazy, then Kendall is outrageous.
As long as someone is either crazy or not elated, he is plastic and excited.
Someone who is not outrageous is always not plastic.
If Douglas is not crazy, then Stewart is open, and vice versa.
If someone is crazy, then he is both not excited and not outrageous. | Kendall is not excited. | neutral |
Lucy is crazy.
Douglas is not open.
Homer is elated.
Lucy is excited.
Stewart is elated.
Lucy is not open.
Lucy is outrageous.
Homer is not excited.
Homer is open.
Stewart is excited.
Stewart is not outrageous.
Samson is not open.If there is someone who is either not open or not plastic, then Lucy is elated and Kendall is not outrageous.
Homer being not elated or Homer being plastic implies that Kendall is excited.
If there is someone who is both crazy and outrageous, then Douglas is not open.
If someone who is not outrageous is also plastic, then he is not elated.
If Samson is open, then Lucy is not crazy and Stewart is elated, and vice versa.
Douglas being plastic is equivalent to Alexia being open and Samson being not excited.
If all people are elated, then Stewart is not crazy and Douglas is excited.
If there is at least one people who is not crazy, then Kendall is outrageous.
As long as someone is either crazy or not elated, he is plastic and excited.
Someone who is not outrageous is always not plastic.
If Douglas is not crazy, then Stewart is open, and vice versa.
If someone is crazy, then he is both not excited and not outrageous. | Stewart is elated. | entailment |
Lucy is crazy.
Douglas is not open.
Homer is elated.
Lucy is excited.
Stewart is elated.
Lucy is not open.
Lucy is outrageous.
Homer is not excited.
Homer is open.
Stewart is excited.
Stewart is not outrageous.
Samson is not open.If there is someone who is either not open or not plastic, then Lucy is elated and Kendall is not outrageous.
Homer being not elated or Homer being plastic implies that Kendall is excited.
If there is someone who is both crazy and outrageous, then Douglas is not open.
If someone who is not outrageous is also plastic, then he is not elated.
If Samson is open, then Lucy is not crazy and Stewart is elated, and vice versa.
Douglas being plastic is equivalent to Alexia being open and Samson being not excited.
If all people are elated, then Stewart is not crazy and Douglas is excited.
If there is at least one people who is not crazy, then Kendall is outrageous.
As long as someone is either crazy or not elated, he is plastic and excited.
Someone who is not outrageous is always not plastic.
If Douglas is not crazy, then Stewart is open, and vice versa.
If someone is crazy, then he is both not excited and not outrageous. | Lucy is not outrageous. | self_contradiction |
Lucy is crazy.
Douglas is not open.
Homer is elated.
Lucy is excited.
Stewart is elated.
Lucy is not open.
Lucy is outrageous.
Homer is not excited.
Homer is open.
Stewart is excited.
Stewart is not outrageous.
Samson is not open.If there is someone who is either not open or not plastic, then Lucy is elated and Kendall is not outrageous.
Homer being not elated or Homer being plastic implies that Kendall is excited.
If there is someone who is both crazy and outrageous, then Douglas is not open.
If someone who is not outrageous is also plastic, then he is not elated.
If Samson is open, then Lucy is not crazy and Stewart is elated, and vice versa.
Douglas being plastic is equivalent to Alexia being open and Samson being not excited.
If all people are elated, then Stewart is not crazy and Douglas is excited.
If there is at least one people who is not crazy, then Kendall is outrageous.
As long as someone is either crazy or not elated, he is plastic and excited.
Someone who is not outrageous is always not plastic.
If Douglas is not crazy, then Stewart is open, and vice versa.
If someone is crazy, then he is both not excited and not outrageous. | Lucy is not elated. | self_contradiction |
Alexis is tough.
Jason is not powerful.
Alexis is polite.
Kyle is polite.
Jason is not funny.
Murray is not polite.
Alexis is not modern.
Morris is not funny.
Gemma is not powerful.
Morris is polite.
Timothy is funny.
Kyle is tough.If Kyle is pink or Gemma is funny, then Gemma is powerful.
If Morris is modern and Timothy is not tough, then Kyle is not powerful and Jason is not polite, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is modern or not funny, then Murray is not powerful.
If there is someone who is not polite, then Alexis is powerful.
It can be concluded that Jason is not pink and Morris is not modern once knowing that Murray is not funny.
Someone being both not modern and polite is equivalent to being powerful and pink.
If there is someone who is modern, then Alexis is not polite and Alexis is not tough.
If someone is funny or he is powerful, then he is not pink.
Someone being both not pink and polite is equivalent to being not modern and tough.
Someone who is pink is always both tough and not powerful.
If there is nobody who is not polite, then Timothy is tough and Jason is modern.
If someone is both powerful and not pink, then he is not polite. | Alexis is pink. | self_contradiction |
Alexis is tough.
Jason is not powerful.
Alexis is polite.
Kyle is polite.
Jason is not funny.
Murray is not polite.
Alexis is not modern.
Morris is not funny.
Gemma is not powerful.
Morris is polite.
Timothy is funny.
Kyle is tough.If Kyle is pink or Gemma is funny, then Gemma is powerful.
If Morris is modern and Timothy is not tough, then Kyle is not powerful and Jason is not polite, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is modern or not funny, then Murray is not powerful.
If there is someone who is not polite, then Alexis is powerful.
It can be concluded that Jason is not pink and Morris is not modern once knowing that Murray is not funny.
Someone being both not modern and polite is equivalent to being powerful and pink.
If there is someone who is modern, then Alexis is not polite and Alexis is not tough.
If someone is funny or he is powerful, then he is not pink.
Someone being both not pink and polite is equivalent to being not modern and tough.
Someone who is pink is always both tough and not powerful.
If there is nobody who is not polite, then Timothy is tough and Jason is modern.
If someone is both powerful and not pink, then he is not polite. | Alexis is not polite. | self_contradiction |
Alexis is tough.
Jason is not powerful.
Alexis is polite.
Kyle is polite.
Jason is not funny.
Murray is not polite.
Alexis is not modern.
Morris is not funny.
Gemma is not powerful.
Morris is polite.
Timothy is funny.
Kyle is tough.If Kyle is pink or Gemma is funny, then Gemma is powerful.
If Morris is modern and Timothy is not tough, then Kyle is not powerful and Jason is not polite, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is modern or not funny, then Murray is not powerful.
If there is someone who is not polite, then Alexis is powerful.
It can be concluded that Jason is not pink and Morris is not modern once knowing that Murray is not funny.
Someone being both not modern and polite is equivalent to being powerful and pink.
If there is someone who is modern, then Alexis is not polite and Alexis is not tough.
If someone is funny or he is powerful, then he is not pink.
Someone being both not pink and polite is equivalent to being not modern and tough.
Someone who is pink is always both tough and not powerful.
If there is nobody who is not polite, then Timothy is tough and Jason is modern.
If someone is both powerful and not pink, then he is not polite. | Timothy is pink. | contradiction |
Alexis is tough.
Jason is not powerful.
Alexis is polite.
Kyle is polite.
Jason is not funny.
Murray is not polite.
Alexis is not modern.
Morris is not funny.
Gemma is not powerful.
Morris is polite.
Timothy is funny.
Kyle is tough.If Kyle is pink or Gemma is funny, then Gemma is powerful.
If Morris is modern and Timothy is not tough, then Kyle is not powerful and Jason is not polite, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is modern or not funny, then Murray is not powerful.
If there is someone who is not polite, then Alexis is powerful.
It can be concluded that Jason is not pink and Morris is not modern once knowing that Murray is not funny.
Someone being both not modern and polite is equivalent to being powerful and pink.
If there is someone who is modern, then Alexis is not polite and Alexis is not tough.
If someone is funny or he is powerful, then he is not pink.
Someone being both not pink and polite is equivalent to being not modern and tough.
Someone who is pink is always both tough and not powerful.
If there is nobody who is not polite, then Timothy is tough and Jason is modern.
If someone is both powerful and not pink, then he is not polite. | Jason is not pink. | neutral |
Alexis is tough.
Jason is not powerful.
Alexis is polite.
Kyle is polite.
Jason is not funny.
Murray is not polite.
Alexis is not modern.
Morris is not funny.
Gemma is not powerful.
Morris is polite.
Timothy is funny.
Kyle is tough.If Kyle is pink or Gemma is funny, then Gemma is powerful.
If Morris is modern and Timothy is not tough, then Kyle is not powerful and Jason is not polite, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is modern or not funny, then Murray is not powerful.
If there is someone who is not polite, then Alexis is powerful.
It can be concluded that Jason is not pink and Morris is not modern once knowing that Murray is not funny.
Someone being both not modern and polite is equivalent to being powerful and pink.
If there is someone who is modern, then Alexis is not polite and Alexis is not tough.
If someone is funny or he is powerful, then he is not pink.
Someone being both not pink and polite is equivalent to being not modern and tough.
Someone who is pink is always both tough and not powerful.
If there is nobody who is not polite, then Timothy is tough and Jason is modern.
If someone is both powerful and not pink, then he is not polite. | Timothy is not pink. | entailment |
Alexis is tough.
Jason is not powerful.
Alexis is polite.
Kyle is polite.
Jason is not funny.
Murray is not polite.
Alexis is not modern.
Morris is not funny.
Gemma is not powerful.
Morris is polite.
Timothy is funny.
Kyle is tough.If Kyle is pink or Gemma is funny, then Gemma is powerful.
If Morris is modern and Timothy is not tough, then Kyle is not powerful and Jason is not polite, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is modern or not funny, then Murray is not powerful.
If there is someone who is not polite, then Alexis is powerful.
It can be concluded that Jason is not pink and Morris is not modern once knowing that Murray is not funny.
Someone being both not modern and polite is equivalent to being powerful and pink.
If there is someone who is modern, then Alexis is not polite and Alexis is not tough.
If someone is funny or he is powerful, then he is not pink.
Someone being both not pink and polite is equivalent to being not modern and tough.
Someone who is pink is always both tough and not powerful.
If there is nobody who is not polite, then Timothy is tough and Jason is modern.
If someone is both powerful and not pink, then he is not polite. | Jason is tough. | neutral |
Alexis is tough.
Jason is not powerful.
Alexis is polite.
Kyle is polite.
Jason is not funny.
Murray is not polite.
Alexis is not modern.
Morris is not funny.
Gemma is not powerful.
Morris is polite.
Timothy is funny.
Kyle is tough.If Kyle is pink or Gemma is funny, then Gemma is powerful.
If Morris is modern and Timothy is not tough, then Kyle is not powerful and Jason is not polite, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is modern or not funny, then Murray is not powerful.
If there is someone who is not polite, then Alexis is powerful.
It can be concluded that Jason is not pink and Morris is not modern once knowing that Murray is not funny.
Someone being both not modern and polite is equivalent to being powerful and pink.
If there is someone who is modern, then Alexis is not polite and Alexis is not tough.
If someone is funny or he is powerful, then he is not pink.
Someone being both not pink and polite is equivalent to being not modern and tough.
Someone who is pink is always both tough and not powerful.
If there is nobody who is not polite, then Timothy is tough and Jason is modern.
If someone is both powerful and not pink, then he is not polite. | Murray is not polite. | entailment |
Alexis is tough.
Jason is not powerful.
Alexis is polite.
Kyle is polite.
Jason is not funny.
Murray is not polite.
Alexis is not modern.
Morris is not funny.
Gemma is not powerful.
Morris is polite.
Timothy is funny.
Kyle is tough.If Kyle is pink or Gemma is funny, then Gemma is powerful.
If Morris is modern and Timothy is not tough, then Kyle is not powerful and Jason is not polite, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is modern or not funny, then Murray is not powerful.
If there is someone who is not polite, then Alexis is powerful.
It can be concluded that Jason is not pink and Morris is not modern once knowing that Murray is not funny.
Someone being both not modern and polite is equivalent to being powerful and pink.
If there is someone who is modern, then Alexis is not polite and Alexis is not tough.
If someone is funny or he is powerful, then he is not pink.
Someone being both not pink and polite is equivalent to being not modern and tough.
Someone who is pink is always both tough and not powerful.
If there is nobody who is not polite, then Timothy is tough and Jason is modern.
If someone is both powerful and not pink, then he is not polite. | Alexis is powerful. | self_contradiction |
Alexis is tough.
Jason is not powerful.
Alexis is polite.
Kyle is polite.
Jason is not funny.
Murray is not polite.
Alexis is not modern.
Morris is not funny.
Gemma is not powerful.
Morris is polite.
Timothy is funny.
Kyle is tough.If Kyle is pink or Gemma is funny, then Gemma is powerful.
If Morris is modern and Timothy is not tough, then Kyle is not powerful and Jason is not polite, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is modern or not funny, then Murray is not powerful.
If there is someone who is not polite, then Alexis is powerful.
It can be concluded that Jason is not pink and Morris is not modern once knowing that Murray is not funny.
Someone being both not modern and polite is equivalent to being powerful and pink.
If there is someone who is modern, then Alexis is not polite and Alexis is not tough.
If someone is funny or he is powerful, then he is not pink.
Someone being both not pink and polite is equivalent to being not modern and tough.
Someone who is pink is always both tough and not powerful.
If there is nobody who is not polite, then Timothy is tough and Jason is modern.
If someone is both powerful and not pink, then he is not polite. | Murray is powerful. | contradiction |
Alexis is tough.
Jason is not powerful.
Alexis is polite.
Kyle is polite.
Jason is not funny.
Murray is not polite.
Alexis is not modern.
Morris is not funny.
Gemma is not powerful.
Morris is polite.
Timothy is funny.
Kyle is tough.If Kyle is pink or Gemma is funny, then Gemma is powerful.
If Morris is modern and Timothy is not tough, then Kyle is not powerful and Jason is not polite, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is modern or not funny, then Murray is not powerful.
If there is someone who is not polite, then Alexis is powerful.
It can be concluded that Jason is not pink and Morris is not modern once knowing that Murray is not funny.
Someone being both not modern and polite is equivalent to being powerful and pink.
If there is someone who is modern, then Alexis is not polite and Alexis is not tough.
If someone is funny or he is powerful, then he is not pink.
Someone being both not pink and polite is equivalent to being not modern and tough.
Someone who is pink is always both tough and not powerful.
If there is nobody who is not polite, then Timothy is tough and Jason is modern.
If someone is both powerful and not pink, then he is not polite. | Murray is polite. | contradiction |
Alexis is tough.
Jason is not powerful.
Alexis is polite.
Kyle is polite.
Jason is not funny.
Murray is not polite.
Alexis is not modern.
Morris is not funny.
Gemma is not powerful.
Morris is polite.
Timothy is funny.
Kyle is tough.If Kyle is pink or Gemma is funny, then Gemma is powerful.
If Morris is modern and Timothy is not tough, then Kyle is not powerful and Jason is not polite, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is modern or not funny, then Murray is not powerful.
If there is someone who is not polite, then Alexis is powerful.
It can be concluded that Jason is not pink and Morris is not modern once knowing that Murray is not funny.
Someone being both not modern and polite is equivalent to being powerful and pink.
If there is someone who is modern, then Alexis is not polite and Alexis is not tough.
If someone is funny or he is powerful, then he is not pink.
Someone being both not pink and polite is equivalent to being not modern and tough.
Someone who is pink is always both tough and not powerful.
If there is nobody who is not polite, then Timothy is tough and Jason is modern.
If someone is both powerful and not pink, then he is not polite. | Gemma is powerful. | contradiction |
Alexis is tough.
Jason is not powerful.
Alexis is polite.
Kyle is polite.
Jason is not funny.
Murray is not polite.
Alexis is not modern.
Morris is not funny.
Gemma is not powerful.
Morris is polite.
Timothy is funny.
Kyle is tough.If Kyle is pink or Gemma is funny, then Gemma is powerful.
If Morris is modern and Timothy is not tough, then Kyle is not powerful and Jason is not polite, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is modern or not funny, then Murray is not powerful.
If there is someone who is not polite, then Alexis is powerful.
It can be concluded that Jason is not pink and Morris is not modern once knowing that Murray is not funny.
Someone being both not modern and polite is equivalent to being powerful and pink.
If there is someone who is modern, then Alexis is not polite and Alexis is not tough.
If someone is funny or he is powerful, then he is not pink.
Someone being both not pink and polite is equivalent to being not modern and tough.
Someone who is pink is always both tough and not powerful.
If there is nobody who is not polite, then Timothy is tough and Jason is modern.
If someone is both powerful and not pink, then he is not polite. | Morris is polite. | entailment |
Alexis is tough.
Jason is not powerful.
Alexis is polite.
Kyle is polite.
Jason is not funny.
Murray is not polite.
Alexis is not modern.
Morris is not funny.
Gemma is not powerful.
Morris is polite.
Timothy is funny.
Kyle is tough.If Kyle is pink or Gemma is funny, then Gemma is powerful.
If Morris is modern and Timothy is not tough, then Kyle is not powerful and Jason is not polite, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is modern or not funny, then Murray is not powerful.
If there is someone who is not polite, then Alexis is powerful.
It can be concluded that Jason is not pink and Morris is not modern once knowing that Murray is not funny.
Someone being both not modern and polite is equivalent to being powerful and pink.
If there is someone who is modern, then Alexis is not polite and Alexis is not tough.
If someone is funny or he is powerful, then he is not pink.
Someone being both not pink and polite is equivalent to being not modern and tough.
Someone who is pink is always both tough and not powerful.
If there is nobody who is not polite, then Timothy is tough and Jason is modern.
If someone is both powerful and not pink, then he is not polite. | Jason is not funny. | entailment |
Alexis is tough.
Jason is not powerful.
Alexis is polite.
Kyle is polite.
Jason is not funny.
Murray is not polite.
Alexis is not modern.
Morris is not funny.
Gemma is not powerful.
Morris is polite.
Timothy is funny.
Kyle is tough.If Kyle is pink or Gemma is funny, then Gemma is powerful.
If Morris is modern and Timothy is not tough, then Kyle is not powerful and Jason is not polite, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is modern or not funny, then Murray is not powerful.
If there is someone who is not polite, then Alexis is powerful.
It can be concluded that Jason is not pink and Morris is not modern once knowing that Murray is not funny.
Someone being both not modern and polite is equivalent to being powerful and pink.
If there is someone who is modern, then Alexis is not polite and Alexis is not tough.
If someone is funny or he is powerful, then he is not pink.
Someone being both not pink and polite is equivalent to being not modern and tough.
Someone who is pink is always both tough and not powerful.
If there is nobody who is not polite, then Timothy is tough and Jason is modern.
If someone is both powerful and not pink, then he is not polite. | Jason is not powerful. | entailment |
Alexis is tough.
Jason is not powerful.
Alexis is polite.
Kyle is polite.
Jason is not funny.
Murray is not polite.
Alexis is not modern.
Morris is not funny.
Gemma is not powerful.
Morris is polite.
Timothy is funny.
Kyle is tough.If Kyle is pink or Gemma is funny, then Gemma is powerful.
If Morris is modern and Timothy is not tough, then Kyle is not powerful and Jason is not polite, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is modern or not funny, then Murray is not powerful.
If there is someone who is not polite, then Alexis is powerful.
It can be concluded that Jason is not pink and Morris is not modern once knowing that Murray is not funny.
Someone being both not modern and polite is equivalent to being powerful and pink.
If there is someone who is modern, then Alexis is not polite and Alexis is not tough.
If someone is funny or he is powerful, then he is not pink.
Someone being both not pink and polite is equivalent to being not modern and tough.
Someone who is pink is always both tough and not powerful.
If there is nobody who is not polite, then Timothy is tough and Jason is modern.
If someone is both powerful and not pink, then he is not polite. | Alexis is not tough. | contradiction |
Alexis is tough.
Jason is not powerful.
Alexis is polite.
Kyle is polite.
Jason is not funny.
Murray is not polite.
Alexis is not modern.
Morris is not funny.
Gemma is not powerful.
Morris is polite.
Timothy is funny.
Kyle is tough.If Kyle is pink or Gemma is funny, then Gemma is powerful.
If Morris is modern and Timothy is not tough, then Kyle is not powerful and Jason is not polite, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is modern or not funny, then Murray is not powerful.
If there is someone who is not polite, then Alexis is powerful.
It can be concluded that Jason is not pink and Morris is not modern once knowing that Murray is not funny.
Someone being both not modern and polite is equivalent to being powerful and pink.
If there is someone who is modern, then Alexis is not polite and Alexis is not tough.
If someone is funny or he is powerful, then he is not pink.
Someone being both not pink and polite is equivalent to being not modern and tough.
Someone who is pink is always both tough and not powerful.
If there is nobody who is not polite, then Timothy is tough and Jason is modern.
If someone is both powerful and not pink, then he is not polite. | Alexis is not powerful. | self_contradiction |
Alexis is tough.
Jason is not powerful.
Alexis is polite.
Kyle is polite.
Jason is not funny.
Murray is not polite.
Alexis is not modern.
Morris is not funny.
Gemma is not powerful.
Morris is polite.
Timothy is funny.
Kyle is tough.If Kyle is pink or Gemma is funny, then Gemma is powerful.
If Morris is modern and Timothy is not tough, then Kyle is not powerful and Jason is not polite, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is modern or not funny, then Murray is not powerful.
If there is someone who is not polite, then Alexis is powerful.
It can be concluded that Jason is not pink and Morris is not modern once knowing that Murray is not funny.
Someone being both not modern and polite is equivalent to being powerful and pink.
If there is someone who is modern, then Alexis is not polite and Alexis is not tough.
If someone is funny or he is powerful, then he is not pink.
Someone being both not pink and polite is equivalent to being not modern and tough.
Someone who is pink is always both tough and not powerful.
If there is nobody who is not polite, then Timothy is tough and Jason is modern.
If someone is both powerful and not pink, then he is not polite. | Murray is not tough. | neutral |
Alexis is tough.
Jason is not powerful.
Alexis is polite.
Kyle is polite.
Jason is not funny.
Murray is not polite.
Alexis is not modern.
Morris is not funny.
Gemma is not powerful.
Morris is polite.
Timothy is funny.
Kyle is tough.If Kyle is pink or Gemma is funny, then Gemma is powerful.
If Morris is modern and Timothy is not tough, then Kyle is not powerful and Jason is not polite, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is modern or not funny, then Murray is not powerful.
If there is someone who is not polite, then Alexis is powerful.
It can be concluded that Jason is not pink and Morris is not modern once knowing that Murray is not funny.
Someone being both not modern and polite is equivalent to being powerful and pink.
If there is someone who is modern, then Alexis is not polite and Alexis is not tough.
If someone is funny or he is powerful, then he is not pink.
Someone being both not pink and polite is equivalent to being not modern and tough.
Someone who is pink is always both tough and not powerful.
If there is nobody who is not polite, then Timothy is tough and Jason is modern.
If someone is both powerful and not pink, then he is not polite. | Alexis is not funny. | neutral |
Alexis is tough.
Jason is not powerful.
Alexis is polite.
Kyle is polite.
Jason is not funny.
Murray is not polite.
Alexis is not modern.
Morris is not funny.
Gemma is not powerful.
Morris is polite.
Timothy is funny.
Kyle is tough.If Kyle is pink or Gemma is funny, then Gemma is powerful.
If Morris is modern and Timothy is not tough, then Kyle is not powerful and Jason is not polite, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is modern or not funny, then Murray is not powerful.
If there is someone who is not polite, then Alexis is powerful.
It can be concluded that Jason is not pink and Morris is not modern once knowing that Murray is not funny.
Someone being both not modern and polite is equivalent to being powerful and pink.
If there is someone who is modern, then Alexis is not polite and Alexis is not tough.
If someone is funny or he is powerful, then he is not pink.
Someone being both not pink and polite is equivalent to being not modern and tough.
Someone who is pink is always both tough and not powerful.
If there is nobody who is not polite, then Timothy is tough and Jason is modern.
If someone is both powerful and not pink, then he is not polite. | Kyle is funny. | neutral |
Alexis is tough.
Jason is not powerful.
Alexis is polite.
Kyle is polite.
Jason is not funny.
Murray is not polite.
Alexis is not modern.
Morris is not funny.
Gemma is not powerful.
Morris is polite.
Timothy is funny.
Kyle is tough.If Kyle is pink or Gemma is funny, then Gemma is powerful.
If Morris is modern and Timothy is not tough, then Kyle is not powerful and Jason is not polite, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is modern or not funny, then Murray is not powerful.
If there is someone who is not polite, then Alexis is powerful.
It can be concluded that Jason is not pink and Morris is not modern once knowing that Murray is not funny.
Someone being both not modern and polite is equivalent to being powerful and pink.
If there is someone who is modern, then Alexis is not polite and Alexis is not tough.
If someone is funny or he is powerful, then he is not pink.
Someone being both not pink and polite is equivalent to being not modern and tough.
Someone who is pink is always both tough and not powerful.
If there is nobody who is not polite, then Timothy is tough and Jason is modern.
If someone is both powerful and not pink, then he is not polite. | Alexis is not pink. | self_contradiction |
Paxton is not tough.
Ted is annoyed.
Brock is not sensible.
Lionel is distracted.
Carl is grumpy.
Kingsley is not cloudy.
Paxton is annoyed.
Kingsley is not annoyed.
Bud is annoyed.
Brock is not tough.
Kingsley is grumpy.
Paxton is sensible.Someone who is eithor distracted or cloudy is always not sensible.
If Brock is not sensible, then Bud is not annoyed and Kingsley is distracted.
If someone is not annoyed and not grumpy, then he is sensible, and vice versa.
If someone is not cloudy and not grumpy, then he is annoyed, and vice versa.
Ted being not grumpy implies that Lionel is not annoyed.
Someone who is both grumpy and not cloudy is always tough.
If there is someone who is both distracted and annoyed, then Paxton is sensible.
If someone is annoyed, then he is sensible.
If Kingsley is not annoyed, then Bud is not sensible, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not sensible and not cloudy, then Ted is not tough.
Someone is tough and not distracted if and only if he is cloudy and not grumpy.
If there is someone who is either not cloudy or not grumpy, then Bud is not tough. | Lionel is annoyed. | contradiction |
Paxton is not tough.
Ted is annoyed.
Brock is not sensible.
Lionel is distracted.
Carl is grumpy.
Kingsley is not cloudy.
Paxton is annoyed.
Kingsley is not annoyed.
Bud is annoyed.
Brock is not tough.
Kingsley is grumpy.
Paxton is sensible.Someone who is eithor distracted or cloudy is always not sensible.
If Brock is not sensible, then Bud is not annoyed and Kingsley is distracted.
If someone is not annoyed and not grumpy, then he is sensible, and vice versa.
If someone is not cloudy and not grumpy, then he is annoyed, and vice versa.
Ted being not grumpy implies that Lionel is not annoyed.
Someone who is both grumpy and not cloudy is always tough.
If there is someone who is both distracted and annoyed, then Paxton is sensible.
If someone is annoyed, then he is sensible.
If Kingsley is not annoyed, then Bud is not sensible, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not sensible and not cloudy, then Ted is not tough.
Someone is tough and not distracted if and only if he is cloudy and not grumpy.
If there is someone who is either not cloudy or not grumpy, then Bud is not tough. | Kingsley is distracted. | entailment |
Paxton is not tough.
Ted is annoyed.
Brock is not sensible.
Lionel is distracted.
Carl is grumpy.
Kingsley is not cloudy.
Paxton is annoyed.
Kingsley is not annoyed.
Bud is annoyed.
Brock is not tough.
Kingsley is grumpy.
Paxton is sensible.Someone who is eithor distracted or cloudy is always not sensible.
If Brock is not sensible, then Bud is not annoyed and Kingsley is distracted.
If someone is not annoyed and not grumpy, then he is sensible, and vice versa.
If someone is not cloudy and not grumpy, then he is annoyed, and vice versa.
Ted being not grumpy implies that Lionel is not annoyed.
Someone who is both grumpy and not cloudy is always tough.
If there is someone who is both distracted and annoyed, then Paxton is sensible.
If someone is annoyed, then he is sensible.
If Kingsley is not annoyed, then Bud is not sensible, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not sensible and not cloudy, then Ted is not tough.
Someone is tough and not distracted if and only if he is cloudy and not grumpy.
If there is someone who is either not cloudy or not grumpy, then Bud is not tough. | Paxton is tough. | contradiction |
Paxton is not tough.
Ted is annoyed.
Brock is not sensible.
Lionel is distracted.
Carl is grumpy.
Kingsley is not cloudy.
Paxton is annoyed.
Kingsley is not annoyed.
Bud is annoyed.
Brock is not tough.
Kingsley is grumpy.
Paxton is sensible.Someone who is eithor distracted or cloudy is always not sensible.
If Brock is not sensible, then Bud is not annoyed and Kingsley is distracted.
If someone is not annoyed and not grumpy, then he is sensible, and vice versa.
If someone is not cloudy and not grumpy, then he is annoyed, and vice versa.
Ted being not grumpy implies that Lionel is not annoyed.
Someone who is both grumpy and not cloudy is always tough.
If there is someone who is both distracted and annoyed, then Paxton is sensible.
If someone is annoyed, then he is sensible.
If Kingsley is not annoyed, then Bud is not sensible, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not sensible and not cloudy, then Ted is not tough.
Someone is tough and not distracted if and only if he is cloudy and not grumpy.
If there is someone who is either not cloudy or not grumpy, then Bud is not tough. | Bud is not sensible. | self_contradiction |
Paxton is not tough.
Ted is annoyed.
Brock is not sensible.
Lionel is distracted.
Carl is grumpy.
Kingsley is not cloudy.
Paxton is annoyed.
Kingsley is not annoyed.
Bud is annoyed.
Brock is not tough.
Kingsley is grumpy.
Paxton is sensible.Someone who is eithor distracted or cloudy is always not sensible.
If Brock is not sensible, then Bud is not annoyed and Kingsley is distracted.
If someone is not annoyed and not grumpy, then he is sensible, and vice versa.
If someone is not cloudy and not grumpy, then he is annoyed, and vice versa.
Ted being not grumpy implies that Lionel is not annoyed.
Someone who is both grumpy and not cloudy is always tough.
If there is someone who is both distracted and annoyed, then Paxton is sensible.
If someone is annoyed, then he is sensible.
If Kingsley is not annoyed, then Bud is not sensible, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not sensible and not cloudy, then Ted is not tough.
Someone is tough and not distracted if and only if he is cloudy and not grumpy.
If there is someone who is either not cloudy or not grumpy, then Bud is not tough. | Carl is tough. | neutral |
Paxton is not tough.
Ted is annoyed.
Brock is not sensible.
Lionel is distracted.
Carl is grumpy.
Kingsley is not cloudy.
Paxton is annoyed.
Kingsley is not annoyed.
Bud is annoyed.
Brock is not tough.
Kingsley is grumpy.
Paxton is sensible.Someone who is eithor distracted or cloudy is always not sensible.
If Brock is not sensible, then Bud is not annoyed and Kingsley is distracted.
If someone is not annoyed and not grumpy, then he is sensible, and vice versa.
If someone is not cloudy and not grumpy, then he is annoyed, and vice versa.
Ted being not grumpy implies that Lionel is not annoyed.
Someone who is both grumpy and not cloudy is always tough.
If there is someone who is both distracted and annoyed, then Paxton is sensible.
If someone is annoyed, then he is sensible.
If Kingsley is not annoyed, then Bud is not sensible, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not sensible and not cloudy, then Ted is not tough.
Someone is tough and not distracted if and only if he is cloudy and not grumpy.
If there is someone who is either not cloudy or not grumpy, then Bud is not tough. | Carl is not grumpy. | contradiction |
Paxton is not tough.
Ted is annoyed.
Brock is not sensible.
Lionel is distracted.
Carl is grumpy.
Kingsley is not cloudy.
Paxton is annoyed.
Kingsley is not annoyed.
Bud is annoyed.
Brock is not tough.
Kingsley is grumpy.
Paxton is sensible.Someone who is eithor distracted or cloudy is always not sensible.
If Brock is not sensible, then Bud is not annoyed and Kingsley is distracted.
If someone is not annoyed and not grumpy, then he is sensible, and vice versa.
If someone is not cloudy and not grumpy, then he is annoyed, and vice versa.
Ted being not grumpy implies that Lionel is not annoyed.
Someone who is both grumpy and not cloudy is always tough.
If there is someone who is both distracted and annoyed, then Paxton is sensible.
If someone is annoyed, then he is sensible.
If Kingsley is not annoyed, then Bud is not sensible, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not sensible and not cloudy, then Ted is not tough.
Someone is tough and not distracted if and only if he is cloudy and not grumpy.
If there is someone who is either not cloudy or not grumpy, then Bud is not tough. | Bud is sensible. | self_contradiction |
Paxton is not tough.
Ted is annoyed.
Brock is not sensible.
Lionel is distracted.
Carl is grumpy.
Kingsley is not cloudy.
Paxton is annoyed.
Kingsley is not annoyed.
Bud is annoyed.
Brock is not tough.
Kingsley is grumpy.
Paxton is sensible.Someone who is eithor distracted or cloudy is always not sensible.
If Brock is not sensible, then Bud is not annoyed and Kingsley is distracted.
If someone is not annoyed and not grumpy, then he is sensible, and vice versa.
If someone is not cloudy and not grumpy, then he is annoyed, and vice versa.
Ted being not grumpy implies that Lionel is not annoyed.
Someone who is both grumpy and not cloudy is always tough.
If there is someone who is both distracted and annoyed, then Paxton is sensible.
If someone is annoyed, then he is sensible.
If Kingsley is not annoyed, then Bud is not sensible, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not sensible and not cloudy, then Ted is not tough.
Someone is tough and not distracted if and only if he is cloudy and not grumpy.
If there is someone who is either not cloudy or not grumpy, then Bud is not tough. | Bud is not tough. | entailment |
Paxton is not tough.
Ted is annoyed.
Brock is not sensible.
Lionel is distracted.
Carl is grumpy.
Kingsley is not cloudy.
Paxton is annoyed.
Kingsley is not annoyed.
Bud is annoyed.
Brock is not tough.
Kingsley is grumpy.
Paxton is sensible.Someone who is eithor distracted or cloudy is always not sensible.
If Brock is not sensible, then Bud is not annoyed and Kingsley is distracted.
If someone is not annoyed and not grumpy, then he is sensible, and vice versa.
If someone is not cloudy and not grumpy, then he is annoyed, and vice versa.
Ted being not grumpy implies that Lionel is not annoyed.
Someone who is both grumpy and not cloudy is always tough.
If there is someone who is both distracted and annoyed, then Paxton is sensible.
If someone is annoyed, then he is sensible.
If Kingsley is not annoyed, then Bud is not sensible, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not sensible and not cloudy, then Ted is not tough.
Someone is tough and not distracted if and only if he is cloudy and not grumpy.
If there is someone who is either not cloudy or not grumpy, then Bud is not tough. | Lionel is cloudy. | neutral |
Paxton is not tough.
Ted is annoyed.
Brock is not sensible.
Lionel is distracted.
Carl is grumpy.
Kingsley is not cloudy.
Paxton is annoyed.
Kingsley is not annoyed.
Bud is annoyed.
Brock is not tough.
Kingsley is grumpy.
Paxton is sensible.Someone who is eithor distracted or cloudy is always not sensible.
If Brock is not sensible, then Bud is not annoyed and Kingsley is distracted.
If someone is not annoyed and not grumpy, then he is sensible, and vice versa.
If someone is not cloudy and not grumpy, then he is annoyed, and vice versa.
Ted being not grumpy implies that Lionel is not annoyed.
Someone who is both grumpy and not cloudy is always tough.
If there is someone who is both distracted and annoyed, then Paxton is sensible.
If someone is annoyed, then he is sensible.
If Kingsley is not annoyed, then Bud is not sensible, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not sensible and not cloudy, then Ted is not tough.
Someone is tough and not distracted if and only if he is cloudy and not grumpy.
If there is someone who is either not cloudy or not grumpy, then Bud is not tough. | Brock is sensible. | contradiction |
Paxton is not tough.
Ted is annoyed.
Brock is not sensible.
Lionel is distracted.
Carl is grumpy.
Kingsley is not cloudy.
Paxton is annoyed.
Kingsley is not annoyed.
Bud is annoyed.
Brock is not tough.
Kingsley is grumpy.
Paxton is sensible.Someone who is eithor distracted or cloudy is always not sensible.
If Brock is not sensible, then Bud is not annoyed and Kingsley is distracted.
If someone is not annoyed and not grumpy, then he is sensible, and vice versa.
If someone is not cloudy and not grumpy, then he is annoyed, and vice versa.
Ted being not grumpy implies that Lionel is not annoyed.
Someone who is both grumpy and not cloudy is always tough.
If there is someone who is both distracted and annoyed, then Paxton is sensible.
If someone is annoyed, then he is sensible.
If Kingsley is not annoyed, then Bud is not sensible, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not sensible and not cloudy, then Ted is not tough.
Someone is tough and not distracted if and only if he is cloudy and not grumpy.
If there is someone who is either not cloudy or not grumpy, then Bud is not tough. | Carl is not annoyed. | neutral |
Paxton is not tough.
Ted is annoyed.
Brock is not sensible.
Lionel is distracted.
Carl is grumpy.
Kingsley is not cloudy.
Paxton is annoyed.
Kingsley is not annoyed.
Bud is annoyed.
Brock is not tough.
Kingsley is grumpy.
Paxton is sensible.Someone who is eithor distracted or cloudy is always not sensible.
If Brock is not sensible, then Bud is not annoyed and Kingsley is distracted.
If someone is not annoyed and not grumpy, then he is sensible, and vice versa.
If someone is not cloudy and not grumpy, then he is annoyed, and vice versa.
Ted being not grumpy implies that Lionel is not annoyed.
Someone who is both grumpy and not cloudy is always tough.
If there is someone who is both distracted and annoyed, then Paxton is sensible.
If someone is annoyed, then he is sensible.
If Kingsley is not annoyed, then Bud is not sensible, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not sensible and not cloudy, then Ted is not tough.
Someone is tough and not distracted if and only if he is cloudy and not grumpy.
If there is someone who is either not cloudy or not grumpy, then Bud is not tough. | Paxton is not annoyed. | self_contradiction |
Paxton is not tough.
Ted is annoyed.
Brock is not sensible.
Lionel is distracted.
Carl is grumpy.
Kingsley is not cloudy.
Paxton is annoyed.
Kingsley is not annoyed.
Bud is annoyed.
Brock is not tough.
Kingsley is grumpy.
Paxton is sensible.Someone who is eithor distracted or cloudy is always not sensible.
If Brock is not sensible, then Bud is not annoyed and Kingsley is distracted.
If someone is not annoyed and not grumpy, then he is sensible, and vice versa.
If someone is not cloudy and not grumpy, then he is annoyed, and vice versa.
Ted being not grumpy implies that Lionel is not annoyed.
Someone who is both grumpy and not cloudy is always tough.
If there is someone who is both distracted and annoyed, then Paxton is sensible.
If someone is annoyed, then he is sensible.
If Kingsley is not annoyed, then Bud is not sensible, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not sensible and not cloudy, then Ted is not tough.
Someone is tough and not distracted if and only if he is cloudy and not grumpy.
If there is someone who is either not cloudy or not grumpy, then Bud is not tough. | Bud is annoyed. | self_contradiction |
Paxton is not tough.
Ted is annoyed.
Brock is not sensible.
Lionel is distracted.
Carl is grumpy.
Kingsley is not cloudy.
Paxton is annoyed.
Kingsley is not annoyed.
Bud is annoyed.
Brock is not tough.
Kingsley is grumpy.
Paxton is sensible.Someone who is eithor distracted or cloudy is always not sensible.
If Brock is not sensible, then Bud is not annoyed and Kingsley is distracted.
If someone is not annoyed and not grumpy, then he is sensible, and vice versa.
If someone is not cloudy and not grumpy, then he is annoyed, and vice versa.
Ted being not grumpy implies that Lionel is not annoyed.
Someone who is both grumpy and not cloudy is always tough.
If there is someone who is both distracted and annoyed, then Paxton is sensible.
If someone is annoyed, then he is sensible.
If Kingsley is not annoyed, then Bud is not sensible, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not sensible and not cloudy, then Ted is not tough.
Someone is tough and not distracted if and only if he is cloudy and not grumpy.
If there is someone who is either not cloudy or not grumpy, then Bud is not tough. | Ted is annoyed. | self_contradiction |
Paxton is not tough.
Ted is annoyed.
Brock is not sensible.
Lionel is distracted.
Carl is grumpy.
Kingsley is not cloudy.
Paxton is annoyed.
Kingsley is not annoyed.
Bud is annoyed.
Brock is not tough.
Kingsley is grumpy.
Paxton is sensible.Someone who is eithor distracted or cloudy is always not sensible.
If Brock is not sensible, then Bud is not annoyed and Kingsley is distracted.
If someone is not annoyed and not grumpy, then he is sensible, and vice versa.
If someone is not cloudy and not grumpy, then he is annoyed, and vice versa.
Ted being not grumpy implies that Lionel is not annoyed.
Someone who is both grumpy and not cloudy is always tough.
If there is someone who is both distracted and annoyed, then Paxton is sensible.
If someone is annoyed, then he is sensible.
If Kingsley is not annoyed, then Bud is not sensible, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not sensible and not cloudy, then Ted is not tough.
Someone is tough and not distracted if and only if he is cloudy and not grumpy.
If there is someone who is either not cloudy or not grumpy, then Bud is not tough. | Brock is not sensible. | entailment |
Paxton is not tough.
Ted is annoyed.
Brock is not sensible.
Lionel is distracted.
Carl is grumpy.
Kingsley is not cloudy.
Paxton is annoyed.
Kingsley is not annoyed.
Bud is annoyed.
Brock is not tough.
Kingsley is grumpy.
Paxton is sensible.Someone who is eithor distracted or cloudy is always not sensible.
If Brock is not sensible, then Bud is not annoyed and Kingsley is distracted.
If someone is not annoyed and not grumpy, then he is sensible, and vice versa.
If someone is not cloudy and not grumpy, then he is annoyed, and vice versa.
Ted being not grumpy implies that Lionel is not annoyed.
Someone who is both grumpy and not cloudy is always tough.
If there is someone who is both distracted and annoyed, then Paxton is sensible.
If someone is annoyed, then he is sensible.
If Kingsley is not annoyed, then Bud is not sensible, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not sensible and not cloudy, then Ted is not tough.
Someone is tough and not distracted if and only if he is cloudy and not grumpy.
If there is someone who is either not cloudy or not grumpy, then Bud is not tough. | Paxton is sensible. | entailment |
Paxton is not tough.
Ted is annoyed.
Brock is not sensible.
Lionel is distracted.
Carl is grumpy.
Kingsley is not cloudy.
Paxton is annoyed.
Kingsley is not annoyed.
Bud is annoyed.
Brock is not tough.
Kingsley is grumpy.
Paxton is sensible.Someone who is eithor distracted or cloudy is always not sensible.
If Brock is not sensible, then Bud is not annoyed and Kingsley is distracted.
If someone is not annoyed and not grumpy, then he is sensible, and vice versa.
If someone is not cloudy and not grumpy, then he is annoyed, and vice versa.
Ted being not grumpy implies that Lionel is not annoyed.
Someone who is both grumpy and not cloudy is always tough.
If there is someone who is both distracted and annoyed, then Paxton is sensible.
If someone is annoyed, then he is sensible.
If Kingsley is not annoyed, then Bud is not sensible, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not sensible and not cloudy, then Ted is not tough.
Someone is tough and not distracted if and only if he is cloudy and not grumpy.
If there is someone who is either not cloudy or not grumpy, then Bud is not tough. | Ted is not cloudy. | entailment |
Paxton is not tough.
Ted is annoyed.
Brock is not sensible.
Lionel is distracted.
Carl is grumpy.
Kingsley is not cloudy.
Paxton is annoyed.
Kingsley is not annoyed.
Bud is annoyed.
Brock is not tough.
Kingsley is grumpy.
Paxton is sensible.Someone who is eithor distracted or cloudy is always not sensible.
If Brock is not sensible, then Bud is not annoyed and Kingsley is distracted.
If someone is not annoyed and not grumpy, then he is sensible, and vice versa.
If someone is not cloudy and not grumpy, then he is annoyed, and vice versa.
Ted being not grumpy implies that Lionel is not annoyed.
Someone who is both grumpy and not cloudy is always tough.
If there is someone who is both distracted and annoyed, then Paxton is sensible.
If someone is annoyed, then he is sensible.
If Kingsley is not annoyed, then Bud is not sensible, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not sensible and not cloudy, then Ted is not tough.
Someone is tough and not distracted if and only if he is cloudy and not grumpy.
If there is someone who is either not cloudy or not grumpy, then Bud is not tough. | Brock is grumpy. | neutral |
Paxton is not tough.
Ted is annoyed.
Brock is not sensible.
Lionel is distracted.
Carl is grumpy.
Kingsley is not cloudy.
Paxton is annoyed.
Kingsley is not annoyed.
Bud is annoyed.
Brock is not tough.
Kingsley is grumpy.
Paxton is sensible.Someone who is eithor distracted or cloudy is always not sensible.
If Brock is not sensible, then Bud is not annoyed and Kingsley is distracted.
If someone is not annoyed and not grumpy, then he is sensible, and vice versa.
If someone is not cloudy and not grumpy, then he is annoyed, and vice versa.
Ted being not grumpy implies that Lionel is not annoyed.
Someone who is both grumpy and not cloudy is always tough.
If there is someone who is both distracted and annoyed, then Paxton is sensible.
If someone is annoyed, then he is sensible.
If Kingsley is not annoyed, then Bud is not sensible, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not sensible and not cloudy, then Ted is not tough.
Someone is tough and not distracted if and only if he is cloudy and not grumpy.
If there is someone who is either not cloudy or not grumpy, then Bud is not tough. | Carl is not cloudy. | neutral |
Paxton is not tough.
Ted is annoyed.
Brock is not sensible.
Lionel is distracted.
Carl is grumpy.
Kingsley is not cloudy.
Paxton is annoyed.
Kingsley is not annoyed.
Bud is annoyed.
Brock is not tough.
Kingsley is grumpy.
Paxton is sensible.Someone who is eithor distracted or cloudy is always not sensible.
If Brock is not sensible, then Bud is not annoyed and Kingsley is distracted.
If someone is not annoyed and not grumpy, then he is sensible, and vice versa.
If someone is not cloudy and not grumpy, then he is annoyed, and vice versa.
Ted being not grumpy implies that Lionel is not annoyed.
Someone who is both grumpy and not cloudy is always tough.
If there is someone who is both distracted and annoyed, then Paxton is sensible.
If someone is annoyed, then he is sensible.
If Kingsley is not annoyed, then Bud is not sensible, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not sensible and not cloudy, then Ted is not tough.
Someone is tough and not distracted if and only if he is cloudy and not grumpy.
If there is someone who is either not cloudy or not grumpy, then Bud is not tough. | Kingsley is cloudy. | contradiction |
Hadwin is not ugly.
Conan is not sweet.
Helena is ugly.
Hadwin is successful.
Conan is not ugly.
Nicholas is sweet.
Joshua is not sweet.
Joshua is not elegant.
Martin is not sweet.
Homer is elegant.
Martin is not crooked.
Conan is not crooked.If there is someone who is not stormy, then Conan is not sweet.
If there is someone who is either stormy or not sweet, then Nicholas is ugly.
It can be concluded that Homer is sweet once knowing that Conan is stormy and Nicholas is not crooked.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is stormy once knowing that Helena is not crooked or Hadwin is not ugly.
If there is someone who is both not crooked and elegant, then Conan is sweet.
If there is someone who is crooked, then Hadwin is not stormy and Nicholas is not successful.
If Joshua is not elegant, then Homer is crooked and Conan is ugly.
If Nicholas is sweet, then Homer is successful and Conan is not crooked.
If Martin is ugly and Nicholas is stormy, then Hadwin is elegant and Joshua is not crooked, and vice versa.
Someone is ugly and not successful if and only if he is not sweet.
It can be concluded that Martin is stormy once knowing that Hadwin is not sweet.
If there is someone who is ugly, then Helena is successful. | Nicholas is not sweet. | self_contradiction |
Hadwin is not ugly.
Conan is not sweet.
Helena is ugly.
Hadwin is successful.
Conan is not ugly.
Nicholas is sweet.
Joshua is not sweet.
Joshua is not elegant.
Martin is not sweet.
Homer is elegant.
Martin is not crooked.
Conan is not crooked.If there is someone who is not stormy, then Conan is not sweet.
If there is someone who is either stormy or not sweet, then Nicholas is ugly.
It can be concluded that Homer is sweet once knowing that Conan is stormy and Nicholas is not crooked.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is stormy once knowing that Helena is not crooked or Hadwin is not ugly.
If there is someone who is both not crooked and elegant, then Conan is sweet.
If there is someone who is crooked, then Hadwin is not stormy and Nicholas is not successful.
If Joshua is not elegant, then Homer is crooked and Conan is ugly.
If Nicholas is sweet, then Homer is successful and Conan is not crooked.
If Martin is ugly and Nicholas is stormy, then Hadwin is elegant and Joshua is not crooked, and vice versa.
Someone is ugly and not successful if and only if he is not sweet.
It can be concluded that Martin is stormy once knowing that Hadwin is not sweet.
If there is someone who is ugly, then Helena is successful. | Nicholas is not successful. | entailment |
Hadwin is not ugly.
Conan is not sweet.
Helena is ugly.
Hadwin is successful.
Conan is not ugly.
Nicholas is sweet.
Joshua is not sweet.
Joshua is not elegant.
Martin is not sweet.
Homer is elegant.
Martin is not crooked.
Conan is not crooked.If there is someone who is not stormy, then Conan is not sweet.
If there is someone who is either stormy or not sweet, then Nicholas is ugly.
It can be concluded that Homer is sweet once knowing that Conan is stormy and Nicholas is not crooked.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is stormy once knowing that Helena is not crooked or Hadwin is not ugly.
If there is someone who is both not crooked and elegant, then Conan is sweet.
If there is someone who is crooked, then Hadwin is not stormy and Nicholas is not successful.
If Joshua is not elegant, then Homer is crooked and Conan is ugly.
If Nicholas is sweet, then Homer is successful and Conan is not crooked.
If Martin is ugly and Nicholas is stormy, then Hadwin is elegant and Joshua is not crooked, and vice versa.
Someone is ugly and not successful if and only if he is not sweet.
It can be concluded that Martin is stormy once knowing that Hadwin is not sweet.
If there is someone who is ugly, then Helena is successful. | Hadwin is stormy. | self_contradiction |
Hadwin is not ugly.
Conan is not sweet.
Helena is ugly.
Hadwin is successful.
Conan is not ugly.
Nicholas is sweet.
Joshua is not sweet.
Joshua is not elegant.
Martin is not sweet.
Homer is elegant.
Martin is not crooked.
Conan is not crooked.If there is someone who is not stormy, then Conan is not sweet.
If there is someone who is either stormy or not sweet, then Nicholas is ugly.
It can be concluded that Homer is sweet once knowing that Conan is stormy and Nicholas is not crooked.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is stormy once knowing that Helena is not crooked or Hadwin is not ugly.
If there is someone who is both not crooked and elegant, then Conan is sweet.
If there is someone who is crooked, then Hadwin is not stormy and Nicholas is not successful.
If Joshua is not elegant, then Homer is crooked and Conan is ugly.
If Nicholas is sweet, then Homer is successful and Conan is not crooked.
If Martin is ugly and Nicholas is stormy, then Hadwin is elegant and Joshua is not crooked, and vice versa.
Someone is ugly and not successful if and only if he is not sweet.
It can be concluded that Martin is stormy once knowing that Hadwin is not sweet.
If there is someone who is ugly, then Helena is successful. | Hadwin is sweet. | neutral |
Hadwin is not ugly.
Conan is not sweet.
Helena is ugly.
Hadwin is successful.
Conan is not ugly.
Nicholas is sweet.
Joshua is not sweet.
Joshua is not elegant.
Martin is not sweet.
Homer is elegant.
Martin is not crooked.
Conan is not crooked.If there is someone who is not stormy, then Conan is not sweet.
If there is someone who is either stormy or not sweet, then Nicholas is ugly.
It can be concluded that Homer is sweet once knowing that Conan is stormy and Nicholas is not crooked.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is stormy once knowing that Helena is not crooked or Hadwin is not ugly.
If there is someone who is both not crooked and elegant, then Conan is sweet.
If there is someone who is crooked, then Hadwin is not stormy and Nicholas is not successful.
If Joshua is not elegant, then Homer is crooked and Conan is ugly.
If Nicholas is sweet, then Homer is successful and Conan is not crooked.
If Martin is ugly and Nicholas is stormy, then Hadwin is elegant and Joshua is not crooked, and vice versa.
Someone is ugly and not successful if and only if he is not sweet.
It can be concluded that Martin is stormy once knowing that Hadwin is not sweet.
If there is someone who is ugly, then Helena is successful. | Joshua is stormy. | neutral |
Hadwin is not ugly.
Conan is not sweet.
Helena is ugly.
Hadwin is successful.
Conan is not ugly.
Nicholas is sweet.
Joshua is not sweet.
Joshua is not elegant.
Martin is not sweet.
Homer is elegant.
Martin is not crooked.
Conan is not crooked.If there is someone who is not stormy, then Conan is not sweet.
If there is someone who is either stormy or not sweet, then Nicholas is ugly.
It can be concluded that Homer is sweet once knowing that Conan is stormy and Nicholas is not crooked.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is stormy once knowing that Helena is not crooked or Hadwin is not ugly.
If there is someone who is both not crooked and elegant, then Conan is sweet.
If there is someone who is crooked, then Hadwin is not stormy and Nicholas is not successful.
If Joshua is not elegant, then Homer is crooked and Conan is ugly.
If Nicholas is sweet, then Homer is successful and Conan is not crooked.
If Martin is ugly and Nicholas is stormy, then Hadwin is elegant and Joshua is not crooked, and vice versa.
Someone is ugly and not successful if and only if he is not sweet.
It can be concluded that Martin is stormy once knowing that Hadwin is not sweet.
If there is someone who is ugly, then Helena is successful. | Martin is not stormy. | neutral |
Hadwin is not ugly.
Conan is not sweet.
Helena is ugly.
Hadwin is successful.
Conan is not ugly.
Nicholas is sweet.
Joshua is not sweet.
Joshua is not elegant.
Martin is not sweet.
Homer is elegant.
Martin is not crooked.
Conan is not crooked.If there is someone who is not stormy, then Conan is not sweet.
If there is someone who is either stormy or not sweet, then Nicholas is ugly.
It can be concluded that Homer is sweet once knowing that Conan is stormy and Nicholas is not crooked.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is stormy once knowing that Helena is not crooked or Hadwin is not ugly.
If there is someone who is both not crooked and elegant, then Conan is sweet.
If there is someone who is crooked, then Hadwin is not stormy and Nicholas is not successful.
If Joshua is not elegant, then Homer is crooked and Conan is ugly.
If Nicholas is sweet, then Homer is successful and Conan is not crooked.
If Martin is ugly and Nicholas is stormy, then Hadwin is elegant and Joshua is not crooked, and vice versa.
Someone is ugly and not successful if and only if he is not sweet.
It can be concluded that Martin is stormy once knowing that Hadwin is not sweet.
If there is someone who is ugly, then Helena is successful. | Nicholas is successful. | contradiction |
Hadwin is not ugly.
Conan is not sweet.
Helena is ugly.
Hadwin is successful.
Conan is not ugly.
Nicholas is sweet.
Joshua is not sweet.
Joshua is not elegant.
Martin is not sweet.
Homer is elegant.
Martin is not crooked.
Conan is not crooked.If there is someone who is not stormy, then Conan is not sweet.
If there is someone who is either stormy or not sweet, then Nicholas is ugly.
It can be concluded that Homer is sweet once knowing that Conan is stormy and Nicholas is not crooked.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is stormy once knowing that Helena is not crooked or Hadwin is not ugly.
If there is someone who is both not crooked and elegant, then Conan is sweet.
If there is someone who is crooked, then Hadwin is not stormy and Nicholas is not successful.
If Joshua is not elegant, then Homer is crooked and Conan is ugly.
If Nicholas is sweet, then Homer is successful and Conan is not crooked.
If Martin is ugly and Nicholas is stormy, then Hadwin is elegant and Joshua is not crooked, and vice versa.
Someone is ugly and not successful if and only if he is not sweet.
It can be concluded that Martin is stormy once knowing that Hadwin is not sweet.
If there is someone who is ugly, then Helena is successful. | Nicholas is not ugly. | contradiction |
Hadwin is not ugly.
Conan is not sweet.
Helena is ugly.
Hadwin is successful.
Conan is not ugly.
Nicholas is sweet.
Joshua is not sweet.
Joshua is not elegant.
Martin is not sweet.
Homer is elegant.
Martin is not crooked.
Conan is not crooked.If there is someone who is not stormy, then Conan is not sweet.
If there is someone who is either stormy or not sweet, then Nicholas is ugly.
It can be concluded that Homer is sweet once knowing that Conan is stormy and Nicholas is not crooked.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is stormy once knowing that Helena is not crooked or Hadwin is not ugly.
If there is someone who is both not crooked and elegant, then Conan is sweet.
If there is someone who is crooked, then Hadwin is not stormy and Nicholas is not successful.
If Joshua is not elegant, then Homer is crooked and Conan is ugly.
If Nicholas is sweet, then Homer is successful and Conan is not crooked.
If Martin is ugly and Nicholas is stormy, then Hadwin is elegant and Joshua is not crooked, and vice versa.
Someone is ugly and not successful if and only if he is not sweet.
It can be concluded that Martin is stormy once knowing that Hadwin is not sweet.
If there is someone who is ugly, then Helena is successful. | Hadwin is not stormy. | self_contradiction |
Hadwin is not ugly.
Conan is not sweet.
Helena is ugly.
Hadwin is successful.
Conan is not ugly.
Nicholas is sweet.
Joshua is not sweet.
Joshua is not elegant.
Martin is not sweet.
Homer is elegant.
Martin is not crooked.
Conan is not crooked.If there is someone who is not stormy, then Conan is not sweet.
If there is someone who is either stormy or not sweet, then Nicholas is ugly.
It can be concluded that Homer is sweet once knowing that Conan is stormy and Nicholas is not crooked.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is stormy once knowing that Helena is not crooked or Hadwin is not ugly.
If there is someone who is both not crooked and elegant, then Conan is sweet.
If there is someone who is crooked, then Hadwin is not stormy and Nicholas is not successful.
If Joshua is not elegant, then Homer is crooked and Conan is ugly.
If Nicholas is sweet, then Homer is successful and Conan is not crooked.
If Martin is ugly and Nicholas is stormy, then Hadwin is elegant and Joshua is not crooked, and vice versa.
Someone is ugly and not successful if and only if he is not sweet.
It can be concluded that Martin is stormy once knowing that Hadwin is not sweet.
If there is someone who is ugly, then Helena is successful. | Hadwin is ugly. | contradiction |
Hadwin is not ugly.
Conan is not sweet.
Helena is ugly.
Hadwin is successful.
Conan is not ugly.
Nicholas is sweet.
Joshua is not sweet.
Joshua is not elegant.
Martin is not sweet.
Homer is elegant.
Martin is not crooked.
Conan is not crooked.If there is someone who is not stormy, then Conan is not sweet.
If there is someone who is either stormy or not sweet, then Nicholas is ugly.
It can be concluded that Homer is sweet once knowing that Conan is stormy and Nicholas is not crooked.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is stormy once knowing that Helena is not crooked or Hadwin is not ugly.
If there is someone who is both not crooked and elegant, then Conan is sweet.
If there is someone who is crooked, then Hadwin is not stormy and Nicholas is not successful.
If Joshua is not elegant, then Homer is crooked and Conan is ugly.
If Nicholas is sweet, then Homer is successful and Conan is not crooked.
If Martin is ugly and Nicholas is stormy, then Hadwin is elegant and Joshua is not crooked, and vice versa.
Someone is ugly and not successful if and only if he is not sweet.
It can be concluded that Martin is stormy once knowing that Hadwin is not sweet.
If there is someone who is ugly, then Helena is successful. | Joshua is not successful. | entailment |
Hadwin is not ugly.
Conan is not sweet.
Helena is ugly.
Hadwin is successful.
Conan is not ugly.
Nicholas is sweet.
Joshua is not sweet.
Joshua is not elegant.
Martin is not sweet.
Homer is elegant.
Martin is not crooked.
Conan is not crooked.If there is someone who is not stormy, then Conan is not sweet.
If there is someone who is either stormy or not sweet, then Nicholas is ugly.
It can be concluded that Homer is sweet once knowing that Conan is stormy and Nicholas is not crooked.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is stormy once knowing that Helena is not crooked or Hadwin is not ugly.
If there is someone who is both not crooked and elegant, then Conan is sweet.
If there is someone who is crooked, then Hadwin is not stormy and Nicholas is not successful.
If Joshua is not elegant, then Homer is crooked and Conan is ugly.
If Nicholas is sweet, then Homer is successful and Conan is not crooked.
If Martin is ugly and Nicholas is stormy, then Hadwin is elegant and Joshua is not crooked, and vice versa.
Someone is ugly and not successful if and only if he is not sweet.
It can be concluded that Martin is stormy once knowing that Hadwin is not sweet.
If there is someone who is ugly, then Helena is successful. | Nicholas is sweet. | self_contradiction |
Hadwin is not ugly.
Conan is not sweet.
Helena is ugly.
Hadwin is successful.
Conan is not ugly.
Nicholas is sweet.
Joshua is not sweet.
Joshua is not elegant.
Martin is not sweet.
Homer is elegant.
Martin is not crooked.
Conan is not crooked.If there is someone who is not stormy, then Conan is not sweet.
If there is someone who is either stormy or not sweet, then Nicholas is ugly.
It can be concluded that Homer is sweet once knowing that Conan is stormy and Nicholas is not crooked.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is stormy once knowing that Helena is not crooked or Hadwin is not ugly.
If there is someone who is both not crooked and elegant, then Conan is sweet.
If there is someone who is crooked, then Hadwin is not stormy and Nicholas is not successful.
If Joshua is not elegant, then Homer is crooked and Conan is ugly.
If Nicholas is sweet, then Homer is successful and Conan is not crooked.
If Martin is ugly and Nicholas is stormy, then Hadwin is elegant and Joshua is not crooked, and vice versa.
Someone is ugly and not successful if and only if he is not sweet.
It can be concluded that Martin is stormy once knowing that Hadwin is not sweet.
If there is someone who is ugly, then Helena is successful. | Conan is crooked. | contradiction |
Hadwin is not ugly.
Conan is not sweet.
Helena is ugly.
Hadwin is successful.
Conan is not ugly.
Nicholas is sweet.
Joshua is not sweet.
Joshua is not elegant.
Martin is not sweet.
Homer is elegant.
Martin is not crooked.
Conan is not crooked.If there is someone who is not stormy, then Conan is not sweet.
If there is someone who is either stormy or not sweet, then Nicholas is ugly.
It can be concluded that Homer is sweet once knowing that Conan is stormy and Nicholas is not crooked.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is stormy once knowing that Helena is not crooked or Hadwin is not ugly.
If there is someone who is both not crooked and elegant, then Conan is sweet.
If there is someone who is crooked, then Hadwin is not stormy and Nicholas is not successful.
If Joshua is not elegant, then Homer is crooked and Conan is ugly.
If Nicholas is sweet, then Homer is successful and Conan is not crooked.
If Martin is ugly and Nicholas is stormy, then Hadwin is elegant and Joshua is not crooked, and vice versa.
Someone is ugly and not successful if and only if he is not sweet.
It can be concluded that Martin is stormy once knowing that Hadwin is not sweet.
If there is someone who is ugly, then Helena is successful. | Joshua is successful. | contradiction |
Hadwin is not ugly.
Conan is not sweet.
Helena is ugly.
Hadwin is successful.
Conan is not ugly.
Nicholas is sweet.
Joshua is not sweet.
Joshua is not elegant.
Martin is not sweet.
Homer is elegant.
Martin is not crooked.
Conan is not crooked.If there is someone who is not stormy, then Conan is not sweet.
If there is someone who is either stormy or not sweet, then Nicholas is ugly.
It can be concluded that Homer is sweet once knowing that Conan is stormy and Nicholas is not crooked.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is stormy once knowing that Helena is not crooked or Hadwin is not ugly.
If there is someone who is both not crooked and elegant, then Conan is sweet.
If there is someone who is crooked, then Hadwin is not stormy and Nicholas is not successful.
If Joshua is not elegant, then Homer is crooked and Conan is ugly.
If Nicholas is sweet, then Homer is successful and Conan is not crooked.
If Martin is ugly and Nicholas is stormy, then Hadwin is elegant and Joshua is not crooked, and vice versa.
Someone is ugly and not successful if and only if he is not sweet.
It can be concluded that Martin is stormy once knowing that Hadwin is not sweet.
If there is someone who is ugly, then Helena is successful. | Hadwin is successful. | entailment |
Hadwin is not ugly.
Conan is not sweet.
Helena is ugly.
Hadwin is successful.
Conan is not ugly.
Nicholas is sweet.
Joshua is not sweet.
Joshua is not elegant.
Martin is not sweet.
Homer is elegant.
Martin is not crooked.
Conan is not crooked.If there is someone who is not stormy, then Conan is not sweet.
If there is someone who is either stormy or not sweet, then Nicholas is ugly.
It can be concluded that Homer is sweet once knowing that Conan is stormy and Nicholas is not crooked.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is stormy once knowing that Helena is not crooked or Hadwin is not ugly.
If there is someone who is both not crooked and elegant, then Conan is sweet.
If there is someone who is crooked, then Hadwin is not stormy and Nicholas is not successful.
If Joshua is not elegant, then Homer is crooked and Conan is ugly.
If Nicholas is sweet, then Homer is successful and Conan is not crooked.
If Martin is ugly and Nicholas is stormy, then Hadwin is elegant and Joshua is not crooked, and vice versa.
Someone is ugly and not successful if and only if he is not sweet.
It can be concluded that Martin is stormy once knowing that Hadwin is not sweet.
If there is someone who is ugly, then Helena is successful. | Conan is ugly. | self_contradiction |
Hadwin is not ugly.
Conan is not sweet.
Helena is ugly.
Hadwin is successful.
Conan is not ugly.
Nicholas is sweet.
Joshua is not sweet.
Joshua is not elegant.
Martin is not sweet.
Homer is elegant.
Martin is not crooked.
Conan is not crooked.If there is someone who is not stormy, then Conan is not sweet.
If there is someone who is either stormy or not sweet, then Nicholas is ugly.
It can be concluded that Homer is sweet once knowing that Conan is stormy and Nicholas is not crooked.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is stormy once knowing that Helena is not crooked or Hadwin is not ugly.
If there is someone who is both not crooked and elegant, then Conan is sweet.
If there is someone who is crooked, then Hadwin is not stormy and Nicholas is not successful.
If Joshua is not elegant, then Homer is crooked and Conan is ugly.
If Nicholas is sweet, then Homer is successful and Conan is not crooked.
If Martin is ugly and Nicholas is stormy, then Hadwin is elegant and Joshua is not crooked, and vice versa.
Someone is ugly and not successful if and only if he is not sweet.
It can be concluded that Martin is stormy once knowing that Hadwin is not sweet.
If there is someone who is ugly, then Helena is successful. | Conan is stormy. | neutral |
Hadwin is not ugly.
Conan is not sweet.
Helena is ugly.
Hadwin is successful.
Conan is not ugly.
Nicholas is sweet.
Joshua is not sweet.
Joshua is not elegant.
Martin is not sweet.
Homer is elegant.
Martin is not crooked.
Conan is not crooked.If there is someone who is not stormy, then Conan is not sweet.
If there is someone who is either stormy or not sweet, then Nicholas is ugly.
It can be concluded that Homer is sweet once knowing that Conan is stormy and Nicholas is not crooked.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is stormy once knowing that Helena is not crooked or Hadwin is not ugly.
If there is someone who is both not crooked and elegant, then Conan is sweet.
If there is someone who is crooked, then Hadwin is not stormy and Nicholas is not successful.
If Joshua is not elegant, then Homer is crooked and Conan is ugly.
If Nicholas is sweet, then Homer is successful and Conan is not crooked.
If Martin is ugly and Nicholas is stormy, then Hadwin is elegant and Joshua is not crooked, and vice versa.
Someone is ugly and not successful if and only if he is not sweet.
It can be concluded that Martin is stormy once knowing that Hadwin is not sweet.
If there is someone who is ugly, then Helena is successful. | Martin is not successful. | entailment |
Hadwin is not ugly.
Conan is not sweet.
Helena is ugly.
Hadwin is successful.
Conan is not ugly.
Nicholas is sweet.
Joshua is not sweet.
Joshua is not elegant.
Martin is not sweet.
Homer is elegant.
Martin is not crooked.
Conan is not crooked.If there is someone who is not stormy, then Conan is not sweet.
If there is someone who is either stormy or not sweet, then Nicholas is ugly.
It can be concluded that Homer is sweet once knowing that Conan is stormy and Nicholas is not crooked.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is stormy once knowing that Helena is not crooked or Hadwin is not ugly.
If there is someone who is both not crooked and elegant, then Conan is sweet.
If there is someone who is crooked, then Hadwin is not stormy and Nicholas is not successful.
If Joshua is not elegant, then Homer is crooked and Conan is ugly.
If Nicholas is sweet, then Homer is successful and Conan is not crooked.
If Martin is ugly and Nicholas is stormy, then Hadwin is elegant and Joshua is not crooked, and vice versa.
Someone is ugly and not successful if and only if he is not sweet.
It can be concluded that Martin is stormy once knowing that Hadwin is not sweet.
If there is someone who is ugly, then Helena is successful. | Homer is elegant. | entailment |
Hadwin is not ugly.
Conan is not sweet.
Helena is ugly.
Hadwin is successful.
Conan is not ugly.
Nicholas is sweet.
Joshua is not sweet.
Joshua is not elegant.
Martin is not sweet.
Homer is elegant.
Martin is not crooked.
Conan is not crooked.If there is someone who is not stormy, then Conan is not sweet.
If there is someone who is either stormy or not sweet, then Nicholas is ugly.
It can be concluded that Homer is sweet once knowing that Conan is stormy and Nicholas is not crooked.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is stormy once knowing that Helena is not crooked or Hadwin is not ugly.
If there is someone who is both not crooked and elegant, then Conan is sweet.
If there is someone who is crooked, then Hadwin is not stormy and Nicholas is not successful.
If Joshua is not elegant, then Homer is crooked and Conan is ugly.
If Nicholas is sweet, then Homer is successful and Conan is not crooked.
If Martin is ugly and Nicholas is stormy, then Hadwin is elegant and Joshua is not crooked, and vice versa.
Someone is ugly and not successful if and only if he is not sweet.
It can be concluded that Martin is stormy once knowing that Hadwin is not sweet.
If there is someone who is ugly, then Helena is successful. | Helena is not sweet. | neutral |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.