premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Leslie is not helpless.
Ethan is selfish.
Coleman is not helpless.
Morton is not excited.
Jesse is not excited.
Tony is not latter.
Ethan is not latter.
Tony is helpless.
Leslie is latter.
Leslie is superior.
Tony is not selfish.
Tony is not excited.If there is at least one people who is excited or not latter, then Claude is not superior.
If someone who is not helpless is also aware, then he is not latter.
If there is nobody who is not excited, then Jesse is superior and Morton is helpless.
All superior people are selfish.
Ethan being not selfish is equivalent to Morton being not superior and Coleman being not helpless.
If someone is not excited or he is not helpless, then he is latter.
If someone is helpless or excited, then he is aware.
Jesse being superior is equivalent to Tony being helpless and Coleman being not aware.
If there is at least one people who is not latter or selfish, then Jesse is not excited.
If there is at least one people who is both not selfish and not latter, then Leslie is superior.
Someone who is selfish is always aware.
Someone is latter if and only if he is aware. | Leslie is not latter. | self_contradiction |
Leslie is not helpless.
Ethan is selfish.
Coleman is not helpless.
Morton is not excited.
Jesse is not excited.
Tony is not latter.
Ethan is not latter.
Tony is helpless.
Leslie is latter.
Leslie is superior.
Tony is not selfish.
Tony is not excited.If there is at least one people who is excited or not latter, then Claude is not superior.
If someone who is not helpless is also aware, then he is not latter.
If there is nobody who is not excited, then Jesse is superior and Morton is helpless.
All superior people are selfish.
Ethan being not selfish is equivalent to Morton being not superior and Coleman being not helpless.
If someone is not excited or he is not helpless, then he is latter.
If someone is helpless or excited, then he is aware.
Jesse being superior is equivalent to Tony being helpless and Coleman being not aware.
If there is at least one people who is not latter or selfish, then Jesse is not excited.
If there is at least one people who is both not selfish and not latter, then Leslie is superior.
Someone who is selfish is always aware.
Someone is latter if and only if he is aware. | Morton is not helpless. | neutral |
Leslie is not helpless.
Ethan is selfish.
Coleman is not helpless.
Morton is not excited.
Jesse is not excited.
Tony is not latter.
Ethan is not latter.
Tony is helpless.
Leslie is latter.
Leslie is superior.
Tony is not selfish.
Tony is not excited.If there is at least one people who is excited or not latter, then Claude is not superior.
If someone who is not helpless is also aware, then he is not latter.
If there is nobody who is not excited, then Jesse is superior and Morton is helpless.
All superior people are selfish.
Ethan being not selfish is equivalent to Morton being not superior and Coleman being not helpless.
If someone is not excited or he is not helpless, then he is latter.
If someone is helpless or excited, then he is aware.
Jesse being superior is equivalent to Tony being helpless and Coleman being not aware.
If there is at least one people who is not latter or selfish, then Jesse is not excited.
If there is at least one people who is both not selfish and not latter, then Leslie is superior.
Someone who is selfish is always aware.
Someone is latter if and only if he is aware. | Ethan is latter. | self_contradiction |
Leslie is not helpless.
Ethan is selfish.
Coleman is not helpless.
Morton is not excited.
Jesse is not excited.
Tony is not latter.
Ethan is not latter.
Tony is helpless.
Leslie is latter.
Leslie is superior.
Tony is not selfish.
Tony is not excited.If there is at least one people who is excited or not latter, then Claude is not superior.
If someone who is not helpless is also aware, then he is not latter.
If there is nobody who is not excited, then Jesse is superior and Morton is helpless.
All superior people are selfish.
Ethan being not selfish is equivalent to Morton being not superior and Coleman being not helpless.
If someone is not excited or he is not helpless, then he is latter.
If someone is helpless or excited, then he is aware.
Jesse being superior is equivalent to Tony being helpless and Coleman being not aware.
If there is at least one people who is not latter or selfish, then Jesse is not excited.
If there is at least one people who is both not selfish and not latter, then Leslie is superior.
Someone who is selfish is always aware.
Someone is latter if and only if he is aware. | Ethan is not excited. | neutral |
Leslie is not helpless.
Ethan is selfish.
Coleman is not helpless.
Morton is not excited.
Jesse is not excited.
Tony is not latter.
Ethan is not latter.
Tony is helpless.
Leslie is latter.
Leslie is superior.
Tony is not selfish.
Tony is not excited.If there is at least one people who is excited or not latter, then Claude is not superior.
If someone who is not helpless is also aware, then he is not latter.
If there is nobody who is not excited, then Jesse is superior and Morton is helpless.
All superior people are selfish.
Ethan being not selfish is equivalent to Morton being not superior and Coleman being not helpless.
If someone is not excited or he is not helpless, then he is latter.
If someone is helpless or excited, then he is aware.
Jesse being superior is equivalent to Tony being helpless and Coleman being not aware.
If there is at least one people who is not latter or selfish, then Jesse is not excited.
If there is at least one people who is both not selfish and not latter, then Leslie is superior.
Someone who is selfish is always aware.
Someone is latter if and only if he is aware. | Ethan is aware. | entailment |
Leslie is not helpless.
Ethan is selfish.
Coleman is not helpless.
Morton is not excited.
Jesse is not excited.
Tony is not latter.
Ethan is not latter.
Tony is helpless.
Leslie is latter.
Leslie is superior.
Tony is not selfish.
Tony is not excited.If there is at least one people who is excited or not latter, then Claude is not superior.
If someone who is not helpless is also aware, then he is not latter.
If there is nobody who is not excited, then Jesse is superior and Morton is helpless.
All superior people are selfish.
Ethan being not selfish is equivalent to Morton being not superior and Coleman being not helpless.
If someone is not excited or he is not helpless, then he is latter.
If someone is helpless or excited, then he is aware.
Jesse being superior is equivalent to Tony being helpless and Coleman being not aware.
If there is at least one people who is not latter or selfish, then Jesse is not excited.
If there is at least one people who is both not selfish and not latter, then Leslie is superior.
Someone who is selfish is always aware.
Someone is latter if and only if he is aware. | Claude is not superior. | entailment |
Leslie is not helpless.
Ethan is selfish.
Coleman is not helpless.
Morton is not excited.
Jesse is not excited.
Tony is not latter.
Ethan is not latter.
Tony is helpless.
Leslie is latter.
Leslie is superior.
Tony is not selfish.
Tony is not excited.If there is at least one people who is excited or not latter, then Claude is not superior.
If someone who is not helpless is also aware, then he is not latter.
If there is nobody who is not excited, then Jesse is superior and Morton is helpless.
All superior people are selfish.
Ethan being not selfish is equivalent to Morton being not superior and Coleman being not helpless.
If someone is not excited or he is not helpless, then he is latter.
If someone is helpless or excited, then he is aware.
Jesse being superior is equivalent to Tony being helpless and Coleman being not aware.
If there is at least one people who is not latter or selfish, then Jesse is not excited.
If there is at least one people who is both not selfish and not latter, then Leslie is superior.
Someone who is selfish is always aware.
Someone is latter if and only if he is aware. | Tony is not latter. | self_contradiction |
Leslie is not helpless.
Ethan is selfish.
Coleman is not helpless.
Morton is not excited.
Jesse is not excited.
Tony is not latter.
Ethan is not latter.
Tony is helpless.
Leslie is latter.
Leslie is superior.
Tony is not selfish.
Tony is not excited.If there is at least one people who is excited or not latter, then Claude is not superior.
If someone who is not helpless is also aware, then he is not latter.
If there is nobody who is not excited, then Jesse is superior and Morton is helpless.
All superior people are selfish.
Ethan being not selfish is equivalent to Morton being not superior and Coleman being not helpless.
If someone is not excited or he is not helpless, then he is latter.
If someone is helpless or excited, then he is aware.
Jesse being superior is equivalent to Tony being helpless and Coleman being not aware.
If there is at least one people who is not latter or selfish, then Jesse is not excited.
If there is at least one people who is both not selfish and not latter, then Leslie is superior.
Someone who is selfish is always aware.
Someone is latter if and only if he is aware. | Morton is helpless. | neutral |
Leslie is not helpless.
Ethan is selfish.
Coleman is not helpless.
Morton is not excited.
Jesse is not excited.
Tony is not latter.
Ethan is not latter.
Tony is helpless.
Leslie is latter.
Leslie is superior.
Tony is not selfish.
Tony is not excited.If there is at least one people who is excited or not latter, then Claude is not superior.
If someone who is not helpless is also aware, then he is not latter.
If there is nobody who is not excited, then Jesse is superior and Morton is helpless.
All superior people are selfish.
Ethan being not selfish is equivalent to Morton being not superior and Coleman being not helpless.
If someone is not excited or he is not helpless, then he is latter.
If someone is helpless or excited, then he is aware.
Jesse being superior is equivalent to Tony being helpless and Coleman being not aware.
If there is at least one people who is not latter or selfish, then Jesse is not excited.
If there is at least one people who is both not selfish and not latter, then Leslie is superior.
Someone who is selfish is always aware.
Someone is latter if and only if he is aware. | Claude is latter. | neutral |
Leslie is not helpless.
Ethan is selfish.
Coleman is not helpless.
Morton is not excited.
Jesse is not excited.
Tony is not latter.
Ethan is not latter.
Tony is helpless.
Leslie is latter.
Leslie is superior.
Tony is not selfish.
Tony is not excited.If there is at least one people who is excited or not latter, then Claude is not superior.
If someone who is not helpless is also aware, then he is not latter.
If there is nobody who is not excited, then Jesse is superior and Morton is helpless.
All superior people are selfish.
Ethan being not selfish is equivalent to Morton being not superior and Coleman being not helpless.
If someone is not excited or he is not helpless, then he is latter.
If someone is helpless or excited, then he is aware.
Jesse being superior is equivalent to Tony being helpless and Coleman being not aware.
If there is at least one people who is not latter or selfish, then Jesse is not excited.
If there is at least one people who is both not selfish and not latter, then Leslie is superior.
Someone who is selfish is always aware.
Someone is latter if and only if he is aware. | Ethan is not helpless. | neutral |
Leslie is not helpless.
Ethan is selfish.
Coleman is not helpless.
Morton is not excited.
Jesse is not excited.
Tony is not latter.
Ethan is not latter.
Tony is helpless.
Leslie is latter.
Leslie is superior.
Tony is not selfish.
Tony is not excited.If there is at least one people who is excited or not latter, then Claude is not superior.
If someone who is not helpless is also aware, then he is not latter.
If there is nobody who is not excited, then Jesse is superior and Morton is helpless.
All superior people are selfish.
Ethan being not selfish is equivalent to Morton being not superior and Coleman being not helpless.
If someone is not excited or he is not helpless, then he is latter.
If someone is helpless or excited, then he is aware.
Jesse being superior is equivalent to Tony being helpless and Coleman being not aware.
If there is at least one people who is not latter or selfish, then Jesse is not excited.
If there is at least one people who is both not selfish and not latter, then Leslie is superior.
Someone who is selfish is always aware.
Someone is latter if and only if he is aware. | Coleman is not latter. | self_contradiction |
Leslie is not helpless.
Ethan is selfish.
Coleman is not helpless.
Morton is not excited.
Jesse is not excited.
Tony is not latter.
Ethan is not latter.
Tony is helpless.
Leslie is latter.
Leslie is superior.
Tony is not selfish.
Tony is not excited.If there is at least one people who is excited or not latter, then Claude is not superior.
If someone who is not helpless is also aware, then he is not latter.
If there is nobody who is not excited, then Jesse is superior and Morton is helpless.
All superior people are selfish.
Ethan being not selfish is equivalent to Morton being not superior and Coleman being not helpless.
If someone is not excited or he is not helpless, then he is latter.
If someone is helpless or excited, then he is aware.
Jesse being superior is equivalent to Tony being helpless and Coleman being not aware.
If there is at least one people who is not latter or selfish, then Jesse is not excited.
If there is at least one people who is both not selfish and not latter, then Leslie is superior.
Someone who is selfish is always aware.
Someone is latter if and only if he is aware. | Jesse is not aware. | contradiction |
Leslie is not helpless.
Ethan is selfish.
Coleman is not helpless.
Morton is not excited.
Jesse is not excited.
Tony is not latter.
Ethan is not latter.
Tony is helpless.
Leslie is latter.
Leslie is superior.
Tony is not selfish.
Tony is not excited.If there is at least one people who is excited or not latter, then Claude is not superior.
If someone who is not helpless is also aware, then he is not latter.
If there is nobody who is not excited, then Jesse is superior and Morton is helpless.
All superior people are selfish.
Ethan being not selfish is equivalent to Morton being not superior and Coleman being not helpless.
If someone is not excited or he is not helpless, then he is latter.
If someone is helpless or excited, then he is aware.
Jesse being superior is equivalent to Tony being helpless and Coleman being not aware.
If there is at least one people who is not latter or selfish, then Jesse is not excited.
If there is at least one people who is both not selfish and not latter, then Leslie is superior.
Someone who is selfish is always aware.
Someone is latter if and only if he is aware. | Tony is not selfish. | entailment |
Leslie is not helpless.
Ethan is selfish.
Coleman is not helpless.
Morton is not excited.
Jesse is not excited.
Tony is not latter.
Ethan is not latter.
Tony is helpless.
Leslie is latter.
Leslie is superior.
Tony is not selfish.
Tony is not excited.If there is at least one people who is excited or not latter, then Claude is not superior.
If someone who is not helpless is also aware, then he is not latter.
If there is nobody who is not excited, then Jesse is superior and Morton is helpless.
All superior people are selfish.
Ethan being not selfish is equivalent to Morton being not superior and Coleman being not helpless.
If someone is not excited or he is not helpless, then he is latter.
If someone is helpless or excited, then he is aware.
Jesse being superior is equivalent to Tony being helpless and Coleman being not aware.
If there is at least one people who is not latter or selfish, then Jesse is not excited.
If there is at least one people who is both not selfish and not latter, then Leslie is superior.
Someone who is selfish is always aware.
Someone is latter if and only if he is aware. | Ethan is not aware. | contradiction |
Leslie is not helpless.
Ethan is selfish.
Coleman is not helpless.
Morton is not excited.
Jesse is not excited.
Tony is not latter.
Ethan is not latter.
Tony is helpless.
Leslie is latter.
Leslie is superior.
Tony is not selfish.
Tony is not excited.If there is at least one people who is excited or not latter, then Claude is not superior.
If someone who is not helpless is also aware, then he is not latter.
If there is nobody who is not excited, then Jesse is superior and Morton is helpless.
All superior people are selfish.
Ethan being not selfish is equivalent to Morton being not superior and Coleman being not helpless.
If someone is not excited or he is not helpless, then he is latter.
If someone is helpless or excited, then he is aware.
Jesse being superior is equivalent to Tony being helpless and Coleman being not aware.
If there is at least one people who is not latter or selfish, then Jesse is not excited.
If there is at least one people who is both not selfish and not latter, then Leslie is superior.
Someone who is selfish is always aware.
Someone is latter if and only if he is aware. | Tony is latter. | self_contradiction |
Leslie is not helpless.
Ethan is selfish.
Coleman is not helpless.
Morton is not excited.
Jesse is not excited.
Tony is not latter.
Ethan is not latter.
Tony is helpless.
Leslie is latter.
Leslie is superior.
Tony is not selfish.
Tony is not excited.If there is at least one people who is excited or not latter, then Claude is not superior.
If someone who is not helpless is also aware, then he is not latter.
If there is nobody who is not excited, then Jesse is superior and Morton is helpless.
All superior people are selfish.
Ethan being not selfish is equivalent to Morton being not superior and Coleman being not helpless.
If someone is not excited or he is not helpless, then he is latter.
If someone is helpless or excited, then he is aware.
Jesse being superior is equivalent to Tony being helpless and Coleman being not aware.
If there is at least one people who is not latter or selfish, then Jesse is not excited.
If there is at least one people who is both not selfish and not latter, then Leslie is superior.
Someone who is selfish is always aware.
Someone is latter if and only if he is aware. | Leslie is not selfish. | contradiction |
Leslie is not helpless.
Ethan is selfish.
Coleman is not helpless.
Morton is not excited.
Jesse is not excited.
Tony is not latter.
Ethan is not latter.
Tony is helpless.
Leslie is latter.
Leslie is superior.
Tony is not selfish.
Tony is not excited.If there is at least one people who is excited or not latter, then Claude is not superior.
If someone who is not helpless is also aware, then he is not latter.
If there is nobody who is not excited, then Jesse is superior and Morton is helpless.
All superior people are selfish.
Ethan being not selfish is equivalent to Morton being not superior and Coleman being not helpless.
If someone is not excited or he is not helpless, then he is latter.
If someone is helpless or excited, then he is aware.
Jesse being superior is equivalent to Tony being helpless and Coleman being not aware.
If there is at least one people who is not latter or selfish, then Jesse is not excited.
If there is at least one people who is both not selfish and not latter, then Leslie is superior.
Someone who is selfish is always aware.
Someone is latter if and only if he is aware. | Coleman is helpless. | contradiction |
Leslie is not helpless.
Ethan is selfish.
Coleman is not helpless.
Morton is not excited.
Jesse is not excited.
Tony is not latter.
Ethan is not latter.
Tony is helpless.
Leslie is latter.
Leslie is superior.
Tony is not selfish.
Tony is not excited.If there is at least one people who is excited or not latter, then Claude is not superior.
If someone who is not helpless is also aware, then he is not latter.
If there is nobody who is not excited, then Jesse is superior and Morton is helpless.
All superior people are selfish.
Ethan being not selfish is equivalent to Morton being not superior and Coleman being not helpless.
If someone is not excited or he is not helpless, then he is latter.
If someone is helpless or excited, then he is aware.
Jesse being superior is equivalent to Tony being helpless and Coleman being not aware.
If there is at least one people who is not latter or selfish, then Jesse is not excited.
If there is at least one people who is both not selfish and not latter, then Leslie is superior.
Someone who is selfish is always aware.
Someone is latter if and only if he is aware. | Coleman is not helpless. | entailment |
Leslie is not helpless.
Ethan is selfish.
Coleman is not helpless.
Morton is not excited.
Jesse is not excited.
Tony is not latter.
Ethan is not latter.
Tony is helpless.
Leslie is latter.
Leslie is superior.
Tony is not selfish.
Tony is not excited.If there is at least one people who is excited or not latter, then Claude is not superior.
If someone who is not helpless is also aware, then he is not latter.
If there is nobody who is not excited, then Jesse is superior and Morton is helpless.
All superior people are selfish.
Ethan being not selfish is equivalent to Morton being not superior and Coleman being not helpless.
If someone is not excited or he is not helpless, then he is latter.
If someone is helpless or excited, then he is aware.
Jesse being superior is equivalent to Tony being helpless and Coleman being not aware.
If there is at least one people who is not latter or selfish, then Jesse is not excited.
If there is at least one people who is both not selfish and not latter, then Leslie is superior.
Someone who is selfish is always aware.
Someone is latter if and only if he is aware. | Leslie is selfish. | entailment |
Leslie is not helpless.
Ethan is selfish.
Coleman is not helpless.
Morton is not excited.
Jesse is not excited.
Tony is not latter.
Ethan is not latter.
Tony is helpless.
Leslie is latter.
Leslie is superior.
Tony is not selfish.
Tony is not excited.If there is at least one people who is excited or not latter, then Claude is not superior.
If someone who is not helpless is also aware, then he is not latter.
If there is nobody who is not excited, then Jesse is superior and Morton is helpless.
All superior people are selfish.
Ethan being not selfish is equivalent to Morton being not superior and Coleman being not helpless.
If someone is not excited or he is not helpless, then he is latter.
If someone is helpless or excited, then he is aware.
Jesse being superior is equivalent to Tony being helpless and Coleman being not aware.
If there is at least one people who is not latter or selfish, then Jesse is not excited.
If there is at least one people who is both not selfish and not latter, then Leslie is superior.
Someone who is selfish is always aware.
Someone is latter if and only if he is aware. | Morton is not latter. | contradiction |
Solomon is not self-confident.
Bruce is good.
Homer is frightened.
Homer is not funny.
Albion is funny.
Ridley is not good.
Solomon is historical.
Homer is not self-confident.
Raymond is frightened.
Solomon is loyal.
Bruce is loyal.
Ridley is self-confident.If Raymond is loyal, then Albion is self-confident.
Ridley is not historical if and only if Homer is not good and Bruce is loyal.
If someone is loyal or he is not self-confident, then he is not frightened.
If there is at least one people who is both not frightened and funny, then Homer is not loyal.
Someone is not historical and funny if and only if he is not frightened.
All self-confident people are loyal.
It can be concluded that Harvey is not self-confident and Harvey is good once knowing that Solomon is frightened.
If there is nobody who is not self-confident, then Bruce is not funny.
It can be concluded that Ridley is not good once knowing that Raymond is frightened.
If there is someone who is both good and funny, then Bruce is not loyal.
If there is someone who is funny, then Raymond is good.
Someone who is not funny is always self-confident. | Ridley is not funny. | contradiction |
Solomon is not self-confident.
Bruce is good.
Homer is frightened.
Homer is not funny.
Albion is funny.
Ridley is not good.
Solomon is historical.
Homer is not self-confident.
Raymond is frightened.
Solomon is loyal.
Bruce is loyal.
Ridley is self-confident.If Raymond is loyal, then Albion is self-confident.
Ridley is not historical if and only if Homer is not good and Bruce is loyal.
If someone is loyal or he is not self-confident, then he is not frightened.
If there is at least one people who is both not frightened and funny, then Homer is not loyal.
Someone is not historical and funny if and only if he is not frightened.
All self-confident people are loyal.
It can be concluded that Harvey is not self-confident and Harvey is good once knowing that Solomon is frightened.
If there is nobody who is not self-confident, then Bruce is not funny.
It can be concluded that Ridley is not good once knowing that Raymond is frightened.
If there is someone who is both good and funny, then Bruce is not loyal.
If there is someone who is funny, then Raymond is good.
Someone who is not funny is always self-confident. | Bruce is frightened. | contradiction |
Solomon is not self-confident.
Bruce is good.
Homer is frightened.
Homer is not funny.
Albion is funny.
Ridley is not good.
Solomon is historical.
Homer is not self-confident.
Raymond is frightened.
Solomon is loyal.
Bruce is loyal.
Ridley is self-confident.If Raymond is loyal, then Albion is self-confident.
Ridley is not historical if and only if Homer is not good and Bruce is loyal.
If someone is loyal or he is not self-confident, then he is not frightened.
If there is at least one people who is both not frightened and funny, then Homer is not loyal.
Someone is not historical and funny if and only if he is not frightened.
All self-confident people are loyal.
It can be concluded that Harvey is not self-confident and Harvey is good once knowing that Solomon is frightened.
If there is nobody who is not self-confident, then Bruce is not funny.
It can be concluded that Ridley is not good once knowing that Raymond is frightened.
If there is someone who is both good and funny, then Bruce is not loyal.
If there is someone who is funny, then Raymond is good.
Someone who is not funny is always self-confident. | Ridley is not good. | entailment |
Solomon is not self-confident.
Bruce is good.
Homer is frightened.
Homer is not funny.
Albion is funny.
Ridley is not good.
Solomon is historical.
Homer is not self-confident.
Raymond is frightened.
Solomon is loyal.
Bruce is loyal.
Ridley is self-confident.If Raymond is loyal, then Albion is self-confident.
Ridley is not historical if and only if Homer is not good and Bruce is loyal.
If someone is loyal or he is not self-confident, then he is not frightened.
If there is at least one people who is both not frightened and funny, then Homer is not loyal.
Someone is not historical and funny if and only if he is not frightened.
All self-confident people are loyal.
It can be concluded that Harvey is not self-confident and Harvey is good once knowing that Solomon is frightened.
If there is nobody who is not self-confident, then Bruce is not funny.
It can be concluded that Ridley is not good once knowing that Raymond is frightened.
If there is someone who is both good and funny, then Bruce is not loyal.
If there is someone who is funny, then Raymond is good.
Someone who is not funny is always self-confident. | Ridley is historical. | contradiction |
Solomon is not self-confident.
Bruce is good.
Homer is frightened.
Homer is not funny.
Albion is funny.
Ridley is not good.
Solomon is historical.
Homer is not self-confident.
Raymond is frightened.
Solomon is loyal.
Bruce is loyal.
Ridley is self-confident.If Raymond is loyal, then Albion is self-confident.
Ridley is not historical if and only if Homer is not good and Bruce is loyal.
If someone is loyal or he is not self-confident, then he is not frightened.
If there is at least one people who is both not frightened and funny, then Homer is not loyal.
Someone is not historical and funny if and only if he is not frightened.
All self-confident people are loyal.
It can be concluded that Harvey is not self-confident and Harvey is good once knowing that Solomon is frightened.
If there is nobody who is not self-confident, then Bruce is not funny.
It can be concluded that Ridley is not good once knowing that Raymond is frightened.
If there is someone who is both good and funny, then Bruce is not loyal.
If there is someone who is funny, then Raymond is good.
Someone who is not funny is always self-confident. | Solomon is self-confident. | contradiction |
Solomon is not self-confident.
Bruce is good.
Homer is frightened.
Homer is not funny.
Albion is funny.
Ridley is not good.
Solomon is historical.
Homer is not self-confident.
Raymond is frightened.
Solomon is loyal.
Bruce is loyal.
Ridley is self-confident.If Raymond is loyal, then Albion is self-confident.
Ridley is not historical if and only if Homer is not good and Bruce is loyal.
If someone is loyal or he is not self-confident, then he is not frightened.
If there is at least one people who is both not frightened and funny, then Homer is not loyal.
Someone is not historical and funny if and only if he is not frightened.
All self-confident people are loyal.
It can be concluded that Harvey is not self-confident and Harvey is good once knowing that Solomon is frightened.
If there is nobody who is not self-confident, then Bruce is not funny.
It can be concluded that Ridley is not good once knowing that Raymond is frightened.
If there is someone who is both good and funny, then Bruce is not loyal.
If there is someone who is funny, then Raymond is good.
Someone who is not funny is always self-confident. | Bruce is not loyal. | self_contradiction |
Solomon is not self-confident.
Bruce is good.
Homer is frightened.
Homer is not funny.
Albion is funny.
Ridley is not good.
Solomon is historical.
Homer is not self-confident.
Raymond is frightened.
Solomon is loyal.
Bruce is loyal.
Ridley is self-confident.If Raymond is loyal, then Albion is self-confident.
Ridley is not historical if and only if Homer is not good and Bruce is loyal.
If someone is loyal or he is not self-confident, then he is not frightened.
If there is at least one people who is both not frightened and funny, then Homer is not loyal.
Someone is not historical and funny if and only if he is not frightened.
All self-confident people are loyal.
It can be concluded that Harvey is not self-confident and Harvey is good once knowing that Solomon is frightened.
If there is nobody who is not self-confident, then Bruce is not funny.
It can be concluded that Ridley is not good once knowing that Raymond is frightened.
If there is someone who is both good and funny, then Bruce is not loyal.
If there is someone who is funny, then Raymond is good.
Someone who is not funny is always self-confident. | Bruce is loyal. | self_contradiction |
Solomon is not self-confident.
Bruce is good.
Homer is frightened.
Homer is not funny.
Albion is funny.
Ridley is not good.
Solomon is historical.
Homer is not self-confident.
Raymond is frightened.
Solomon is loyal.
Bruce is loyal.
Ridley is self-confident.If Raymond is loyal, then Albion is self-confident.
Ridley is not historical if and only if Homer is not good and Bruce is loyal.
If someone is loyal or he is not self-confident, then he is not frightened.
If there is at least one people who is both not frightened and funny, then Homer is not loyal.
Someone is not historical and funny if and only if he is not frightened.
All self-confident people are loyal.
It can be concluded that Harvey is not self-confident and Harvey is good once knowing that Solomon is frightened.
If there is nobody who is not self-confident, then Bruce is not funny.
It can be concluded that Ridley is not good once knowing that Raymond is frightened.
If there is someone who is both good and funny, then Bruce is not loyal.
If there is someone who is funny, then Raymond is good.
Someone who is not funny is always self-confident. | Harvey is loyal. | neutral |
Solomon is not self-confident.
Bruce is good.
Homer is frightened.
Homer is not funny.
Albion is funny.
Ridley is not good.
Solomon is historical.
Homer is not self-confident.
Raymond is frightened.
Solomon is loyal.
Bruce is loyal.
Ridley is self-confident.If Raymond is loyal, then Albion is self-confident.
Ridley is not historical if and only if Homer is not good and Bruce is loyal.
If someone is loyal or he is not self-confident, then he is not frightened.
If there is at least one people who is both not frightened and funny, then Homer is not loyal.
Someone is not historical and funny if and only if he is not frightened.
All self-confident people are loyal.
It can be concluded that Harvey is not self-confident and Harvey is good once knowing that Solomon is frightened.
If there is nobody who is not self-confident, then Bruce is not funny.
It can be concluded that Ridley is not good once knowing that Raymond is frightened.
If there is someone who is both good and funny, then Bruce is not loyal.
If there is someone who is funny, then Raymond is good.
Someone who is not funny is always self-confident. | Raymond is not frightened. | contradiction |
Solomon is not self-confident.
Bruce is good.
Homer is frightened.
Homer is not funny.
Albion is funny.
Ridley is not good.
Solomon is historical.
Homer is not self-confident.
Raymond is frightened.
Solomon is loyal.
Bruce is loyal.
Ridley is self-confident.If Raymond is loyal, then Albion is self-confident.
Ridley is not historical if and only if Homer is not good and Bruce is loyal.
If someone is loyal or he is not self-confident, then he is not frightened.
If there is at least one people who is both not frightened and funny, then Homer is not loyal.
Someone is not historical and funny if and only if he is not frightened.
All self-confident people are loyal.
It can be concluded that Harvey is not self-confident and Harvey is good once knowing that Solomon is frightened.
If there is nobody who is not self-confident, then Bruce is not funny.
It can be concluded that Ridley is not good once knowing that Raymond is frightened.
If there is someone who is both good and funny, then Bruce is not loyal.
If there is someone who is funny, then Raymond is good.
Someone who is not funny is always self-confident. | Ridley is funny. | entailment |
Solomon is not self-confident.
Bruce is good.
Homer is frightened.
Homer is not funny.
Albion is funny.
Ridley is not good.
Solomon is historical.
Homer is not self-confident.
Raymond is frightened.
Solomon is loyal.
Bruce is loyal.
Ridley is self-confident.If Raymond is loyal, then Albion is self-confident.
Ridley is not historical if and only if Homer is not good and Bruce is loyal.
If someone is loyal or he is not self-confident, then he is not frightened.
If there is at least one people who is both not frightened and funny, then Homer is not loyal.
Someone is not historical and funny if and only if he is not frightened.
All self-confident people are loyal.
It can be concluded that Harvey is not self-confident and Harvey is good once knowing that Solomon is frightened.
If there is nobody who is not self-confident, then Bruce is not funny.
It can be concluded that Ridley is not good once knowing that Raymond is frightened.
If there is someone who is both good and funny, then Bruce is not loyal.
If there is someone who is funny, then Raymond is good.
Someone who is not funny is always self-confident. | Harvey is not good. | neutral |
Solomon is not self-confident.
Bruce is good.
Homer is frightened.
Homer is not funny.
Albion is funny.
Ridley is not good.
Solomon is historical.
Homer is not self-confident.
Raymond is frightened.
Solomon is loyal.
Bruce is loyal.
Ridley is self-confident.If Raymond is loyal, then Albion is self-confident.
Ridley is not historical if and only if Homer is not good and Bruce is loyal.
If someone is loyal or he is not self-confident, then he is not frightened.
If there is at least one people who is both not frightened and funny, then Homer is not loyal.
Someone is not historical and funny if and only if he is not frightened.
All self-confident people are loyal.
It can be concluded that Harvey is not self-confident and Harvey is good once knowing that Solomon is frightened.
If there is nobody who is not self-confident, then Bruce is not funny.
It can be concluded that Ridley is not good once knowing that Raymond is frightened.
If there is someone who is both good and funny, then Bruce is not loyal.
If there is someone who is funny, then Raymond is good.
Someone who is not funny is always self-confident. | Homer is not frightened. | self_contradiction |
Solomon is not self-confident.
Bruce is good.
Homer is frightened.
Homer is not funny.
Albion is funny.
Ridley is not good.
Solomon is historical.
Homer is not self-confident.
Raymond is frightened.
Solomon is loyal.
Bruce is loyal.
Ridley is self-confident.If Raymond is loyal, then Albion is self-confident.
Ridley is not historical if and only if Homer is not good and Bruce is loyal.
If someone is loyal or he is not self-confident, then he is not frightened.
If there is at least one people who is both not frightened and funny, then Homer is not loyal.
Someone is not historical and funny if and only if he is not frightened.
All self-confident people are loyal.
It can be concluded that Harvey is not self-confident and Harvey is good once knowing that Solomon is frightened.
If there is nobody who is not self-confident, then Bruce is not funny.
It can be concluded that Ridley is not good once knowing that Raymond is frightened.
If there is someone who is both good and funny, then Bruce is not loyal.
If there is someone who is funny, then Raymond is good.
Someone who is not funny is always self-confident. | Albion is not loyal. | neutral |
Solomon is not self-confident.
Bruce is good.
Homer is frightened.
Homer is not funny.
Albion is funny.
Ridley is not good.
Solomon is historical.
Homer is not self-confident.
Raymond is frightened.
Solomon is loyal.
Bruce is loyal.
Ridley is self-confident.If Raymond is loyal, then Albion is self-confident.
Ridley is not historical if and only if Homer is not good and Bruce is loyal.
If someone is loyal or he is not self-confident, then he is not frightened.
If there is at least one people who is both not frightened and funny, then Homer is not loyal.
Someone is not historical and funny if and only if he is not frightened.
All self-confident people are loyal.
It can be concluded that Harvey is not self-confident and Harvey is good once knowing that Solomon is frightened.
If there is nobody who is not self-confident, then Bruce is not funny.
It can be concluded that Ridley is not good once knowing that Raymond is frightened.
If there is someone who is both good and funny, then Bruce is not loyal.
If there is someone who is funny, then Raymond is good.
Someone who is not funny is always self-confident. | Homer is not historical. | entailment |
Solomon is not self-confident.
Bruce is good.
Homer is frightened.
Homer is not funny.
Albion is funny.
Ridley is not good.
Solomon is historical.
Homer is not self-confident.
Raymond is frightened.
Solomon is loyal.
Bruce is loyal.
Ridley is self-confident.If Raymond is loyal, then Albion is self-confident.
Ridley is not historical if and only if Homer is not good and Bruce is loyal.
If someone is loyal or he is not self-confident, then he is not frightened.
If there is at least one people who is both not frightened and funny, then Homer is not loyal.
Someone is not historical and funny if and only if he is not frightened.
All self-confident people are loyal.
It can be concluded that Harvey is not self-confident and Harvey is good once knowing that Solomon is frightened.
If there is nobody who is not self-confident, then Bruce is not funny.
It can be concluded that Ridley is not good once knowing that Raymond is frightened.
If there is someone who is both good and funny, then Bruce is not loyal.
If there is someone who is funny, then Raymond is good.
Someone who is not funny is always self-confident. | Harvey is not frightened. | neutral |
Solomon is not self-confident.
Bruce is good.
Homer is frightened.
Homer is not funny.
Albion is funny.
Ridley is not good.
Solomon is historical.
Homer is not self-confident.
Raymond is frightened.
Solomon is loyal.
Bruce is loyal.
Ridley is self-confident.If Raymond is loyal, then Albion is self-confident.
Ridley is not historical if and only if Homer is not good and Bruce is loyal.
If someone is loyal or he is not self-confident, then he is not frightened.
If there is at least one people who is both not frightened and funny, then Homer is not loyal.
Someone is not historical and funny if and only if he is not frightened.
All self-confident people are loyal.
It can be concluded that Harvey is not self-confident and Harvey is good once knowing that Solomon is frightened.
If there is nobody who is not self-confident, then Bruce is not funny.
It can be concluded that Ridley is not good once knowing that Raymond is frightened.
If there is someone who is both good and funny, then Bruce is not loyal.
If there is someone who is funny, then Raymond is good.
Someone who is not funny is always self-confident. | Solomon is good. | neutral |
Solomon is not self-confident.
Bruce is good.
Homer is frightened.
Homer is not funny.
Albion is funny.
Ridley is not good.
Solomon is historical.
Homer is not self-confident.
Raymond is frightened.
Solomon is loyal.
Bruce is loyal.
Ridley is self-confident.If Raymond is loyal, then Albion is self-confident.
Ridley is not historical if and only if Homer is not good and Bruce is loyal.
If someone is loyal or he is not self-confident, then he is not frightened.
If there is at least one people who is both not frightened and funny, then Homer is not loyal.
Someone is not historical and funny if and only if he is not frightened.
All self-confident people are loyal.
It can be concluded that Harvey is not self-confident and Harvey is good once knowing that Solomon is frightened.
If there is nobody who is not self-confident, then Bruce is not funny.
It can be concluded that Ridley is not good once knowing that Raymond is frightened.
If there is someone who is both good and funny, then Bruce is not loyal.
If there is someone who is funny, then Raymond is good.
Someone who is not funny is always self-confident. | Homer is self-confident. | self_contradiction |
Solomon is not self-confident.
Bruce is good.
Homer is frightened.
Homer is not funny.
Albion is funny.
Ridley is not good.
Solomon is historical.
Homer is not self-confident.
Raymond is frightened.
Solomon is loyal.
Bruce is loyal.
Ridley is self-confident.If Raymond is loyal, then Albion is self-confident.
Ridley is not historical if and only if Homer is not good and Bruce is loyal.
If someone is loyal or he is not self-confident, then he is not frightened.
If there is at least one people who is both not frightened and funny, then Homer is not loyal.
Someone is not historical and funny if and only if he is not frightened.
All self-confident people are loyal.
It can be concluded that Harvey is not self-confident and Harvey is good once knowing that Solomon is frightened.
If there is nobody who is not self-confident, then Bruce is not funny.
It can be concluded that Ridley is not good once knowing that Raymond is frightened.
If there is someone who is both good and funny, then Bruce is not loyal.
If there is someone who is funny, then Raymond is good.
Someone who is not funny is always self-confident. | Bruce is good. | entailment |
Solomon is not self-confident.
Bruce is good.
Homer is frightened.
Homer is not funny.
Albion is funny.
Ridley is not good.
Solomon is historical.
Homer is not self-confident.
Raymond is frightened.
Solomon is loyal.
Bruce is loyal.
Ridley is self-confident.If Raymond is loyal, then Albion is self-confident.
Ridley is not historical if and only if Homer is not good and Bruce is loyal.
If someone is loyal or he is not self-confident, then he is not frightened.
If there is at least one people who is both not frightened and funny, then Homer is not loyal.
Someone is not historical and funny if and only if he is not frightened.
All self-confident people are loyal.
It can be concluded that Harvey is not self-confident and Harvey is good once knowing that Solomon is frightened.
If there is nobody who is not self-confident, then Bruce is not funny.
It can be concluded that Ridley is not good once knowing that Raymond is frightened.
If there is someone who is both good and funny, then Bruce is not loyal.
If there is someone who is funny, then Raymond is good.
Someone who is not funny is always self-confident. | Solomon is not frightened. | entailment |
Solomon is not self-confident.
Bruce is good.
Homer is frightened.
Homer is not funny.
Albion is funny.
Ridley is not good.
Solomon is historical.
Homer is not self-confident.
Raymond is frightened.
Solomon is loyal.
Bruce is loyal.
Ridley is self-confident.If Raymond is loyal, then Albion is self-confident.
Ridley is not historical if and only if Homer is not good and Bruce is loyal.
If someone is loyal or he is not self-confident, then he is not frightened.
If there is at least one people who is both not frightened and funny, then Homer is not loyal.
Someone is not historical and funny if and only if he is not frightened.
All self-confident people are loyal.
It can be concluded that Harvey is not self-confident and Harvey is good once knowing that Solomon is frightened.
If there is nobody who is not self-confident, then Bruce is not funny.
It can be concluded that Ridley is not good once knowing that Raymond is frightened.
If there is someone who is both good and funny, then Bruce is not loyal.
If there is someone who is funny, then Raymond is good.
Someone who is not funny is always self-confident. | Solomon is not historical. | self_contradiction |
Amos is big.
Abner is annoyed.
Hadwin is not automatic.
Colin is big.
Colin is not untidy.
Amos is automatic.
Jerry is untidy.
Abner is big.
Colin is not obedient.
Kianna is not dizzy.
Jerry is not big.
Abner is not untidy.Someone is not dizzy and not annoyed if and only if he is not automatic.
If there is at least one people who is not automatic, then Abner is big.
If someone is untidy, then he is not obedient.
If there is someone who is either not big or untidy, then Kianna is not dizzy.
Someone being both not dizzy and not obedient is equivalent to being not annoyed.
Someone who is eithor big or not automatic is always not annoyed.
Kianna is dizzy if and only if Jerry is not annoyed and Gifford is not big.
If someone is both not untidy and automatic, then he is obedient.
If there is at least one people who is not big, then Amos is not obedient and Jerry is annoyed.
Someone who is not obedient and not automatic is always not big and untidy.
If someone who is not big is also annoyed, then he is not automatic.
Someone who is not annoyed is always both automatic and not obedient. | Jerry is not obedient. | entailment |
Amos is big.
Abner is annoyed.
Hadwin is not automatic.
Colin is big.
Colin is not untidy.
Amos is automatic.
Jerry is untidy.
Abner is big.
Colin is not obedient.
Kianna is not dizzy.
Jerry is not big.
Abner is not untidy.Someone is not dizzy and not annoyed if and only if he is not automatic.
If there is at least one people who is not automatic, then Abner is big.
If someone is untidy, then he is not obedient.
If there is someone who is either not big or untidy, then Kianna is not dizzy.
Someone being both not dizzy and not obedient is equivalent to being not annoyed.
Someone who is eithor big or not automatic is always not annoyed.
Kianna is dizzy if and only if Jerry is not annoyed and Gifford is not big.
If someone is both not untidy and automatic, then he is obedient.
If there is at least one people who is not big, then Amos is not obedient and Jerry is annoyed.
Someone who is not obedient and not automatic is always not big and untidy.
If someone who is not big is also annoyed, then he is not automatic.
Someone who is not annoyed is always both automatic and not obedient. | Gifford is not obedient. | neutral |
Amos is big.
Abner is annoyed.
Hadwin is not automatic.
Colin is big.
Colin is not untidy.
Amos is automatic.
Jerry is untidy.
Abner is big.
Colin is not obedient.
Kianna is not dizzy.
Jerry is not big.
Abner is not untidy.Someone is not dizzy and not annoyed if and only if he is not automatic.
If there is at least one people who is not automatic, then Abner is big.
If someone is untidy, then he is not obedient.
If there is someone who is either not big or untidy, then Kianna is not dizzy.
Someone being both not dizzy and not obedient is equivalent to being not annoyed.
Someone who is eithor big or not automatic is always not annoyed.
Kianna is dizzy if and only if Jerry is not annoyed and Gifford is not big.
If someone is both not untidy and automatic, then he is obedient.
If there is at least one people who is not big, then Amos is not obedient and Jerry is annoyed.
Someone who is not obedient and not automatic is always not big and untidy.
If someone who is not big is also annoyed, then he is not automatic.
Someone who is not annoyed is always both automatic and not obedient. | Colin is automatic. | self_contradiction |
Amos is big.
Abner is annoyed.
Hadwin is not automatic.
Colin is big.
Colin is not untidy.
Amos is automatic.
Jerry is untidy.
Abner is big.
Colin is not obedient.
Kianna is not dizzy.
Jerry is not big.
Abner is not untidy.Someone is not dizzy and not annoyed if and only if he is not automatic.
If there is at least one people who is not automatic, then Abner is big.
If someone is untidy, then he is not obedient.
If there is someone who is either not big or untidy, then Kianna is not dizzy.
Someone being both not dizzy and not obedient is equivalent to being not annoyed.
Someone who is eithor big or not automatic is always not annoyed.
Kianna is dizzy if and only if Jerry is not annoyed and Gifford is not big.
If someone is both not untidy and automatic, then he is obedient.
If there is at least one people who is not big, then Amos is not obedient and Jerry is annoyed.
Someone who is not obedient and not automatic is always not big and untidy.
If someone who is not big is also annoyed, then he is not automatic.
Someone who is not annoyed is always both automatic and not obedient. | Jerry is untidy. | entailment |
Amos is big.
Abner is annoyed.
Hadwin is not automatic.
Colin is big.
Colin is not untidy.
Amos is automatic.
Jerry is untidy.
Abner is big.
Colin is not obedient.
Kianna is not dizzy.
Jerry is not big.
Abner is not untidy.Someone is not dizzy and not annoyed if and only if he is not automatic.
If there is at least one people who is not automatic, then Abner is big.
If someone is untidy, then he is not obedient.
If there is someone who is either not big or untidy, then Kianna is not dizzy.
Someone being both not dizzy and not obedient is equivalent to being not annoyed.
Someone who is eithor big or not automatic is always not annoyed.
Kianna is dizzy if and only if Jerry is not annoyed and Gifford is not big.
If someone is both not untidy and automatic, then he is obedient.
If there is at least one people who is not big, then Amos is not obedient and Jerry is annoyed.
Someone who is not obedient and not automatic is always not big and untidy.
If someone who is not big is also annoyed, then he is not automatic.
Someone who is not annoyed is always both automatic and not obedient. | Kianna is annoyed. | neutral |
Amos is big.
Abner is annoyed.
Hadwin is not automatic.
Colin is big.
Colin is not untidy.
Amos is automatic.
Jerry is untidy.
Abner is big.
Colin is not obedient.
Kianna is not dizzy.
Jerry is not big.
Abner is not untidy.Someone is not dizzy and not annoyed if and only if he is not automatic.
If there is at least one people who is not automatic, then Abner is big.
If someone is untidy, then he is not obedient.
If there is someone who is either not big or untidy, then Kianna is not dizzy.
Someone being both not dizzy and not obedient is equivalent to being not annoyed.
Someone who is eithor big or not automatic is always not annoyed.
Kianna is dizzy if and only if Jerry is not annoyed and Gifford is not big.
If someone is both not untidy and automatic, then he is obedient.
If there is at least one people who is not big, then Amos is not obedient and Jerry is annoyed.
Someone who is not obedient and not automatic is always not big and untidy.
If someone who is not big is also annoyed, then he is not automatic.
Someone who is not annoyed is always both automatic and not obedient. | Hadwin is dizzy. | contradiction |
Amos is big.
Abner is annoyed.
Hadwin is not automatic.
Colin is big.
Colin is not untidy.
Amos is automatic.
Jerry is untidy.
Abner is big.
Colin is not obedient.
Kianna is not dizzy.
Jerry is not big.
Abner is not untidy.Someone is not dizzy and not annoyed if and only if he is not automatic.
If there is at least one people who is not automatic, then Abner is big.
If someone is untidy, then he is not obedient.
If there is someone who is either not big or untidy, then Kianna is not dizzy.
Someone being both not dizzy and not obedient is equivalent to being not annoyed.
Someone who is eithor big or not automatic is always not annoyed.
Kianna is dizzy if and only if Jerry is not annoyed and Gifford is not big.
If someone is both not untidy and automatic, then he is obedient.
If there is at least one people who is not big, then Amos is not obedient and Jerry is annoyed.
Someone who is not obedient and not automatic is always not big and untidy.
If someone who is not big is also annoyed, then he is not automatic.
Someone who is not annoyed is always both automatic and not obedient. | Jerry is obedient. | contradiction |
Amos is big.
Abner is annoyed.
Hadwin is not automatic.
Colin is big.
Colin is not untidy.
Amos is automatic.
Jerry is untidy.
Abner is big.
Colin is not obedient.
Kianna is not dizzy.
Jerry is not big.
Abner is not untidy.Someone is not dizzy and not annoyed if and only if he is not automatic.
If there is at least one people who is not automatic, then Abner is big.
If someone is untidy, then he is not obedient.
If there is someone who is either not big or untidy, then Kianna is not dizzy.
Someone being both not dizzy and not obedient is equivalent to being not annoyed.
Someone who is eithor big or not automatic is always not annoyed.
Kianna is dizzy if and only if Jerry is not annoyed and Gifford is not big.
If someone is both not untidy and automatic, then he is obedient.
If there is at least one people who is not big, then Amos is not obedient and Jerry is annoyed.
Someone who is not obedient and not automatic is always not big and untidy.
If someone who is not big is also annoyed, then he is not automatic.
Someone who is not annoyed is always both automatic and not obedient. | Colin is not obedient. | self_contradiction |
Amos is big.
Abner is annoyed.
Hadwin is not automatic.
Colin is big.
Colin is not untidy.
Amos is automatic.
Jerry is untidy.
Abner is big.
Colin is not obedient.
Kianna is not dizzy.
Jerry is not big.
Abner is not untidy.Someone is not dizzy and not annoyed if and only if he is not automatic.
If there is at least one people who is not automatic, then Abner is big.
If someone is untidy, then he is not obedient.
If there is someone who is either not big or untidy, then Kianna is not dizzy.
Someone being both not dizzy and not obedient is equivalent to being not annoyed.
Someone who is eithor big or not automatic is always not annoyed.
Kianna is dizzy if and only if Jerry is not annoyed and Gifford is not big.
If someone is both not untidy and automatic, then he is obedient.
If there is at least one people who is not big, then Amos is not obedient and Jerry is annoyed.
Someone who is not obedient and not automatic is always not big and untidy.
If someone who is not big is also annoyed, then he is not automatic.
Someone who is not annoyed is always both automatic and not obedient. | Amos is big. | self_contradiction |
Amos is big.
Abner is annoyed.
Hadwin is not automatic.
Colin is big.
Colin is not untidy.
Amos is automatic.
Jerry is untidy.
Abner is big.
Colin is not obedient.
Kianna is not dizzy.
Jerry is not big.
Abner is not untidy.Someone is not dizzy and not annoyed if and only if he is not automatic.
If there is at least one people who is not automatic, then Abner is big.
If someone is untidy, then he is not obedient.
If there is someone who is either not big or untidy, then Kianna is not dizzy.
Someone being both not dizzy and not obedient is equivalent to being not annoyed.
Someone who is eithor big or not automatic is always not annoyed.
Kianna is dizzy if and only if Jerry is not annoyed and Gifford is not big.
If someone is both not untidy and automatic, then he is obedient.
If there is at least one people who is not big, then Amos is not obedient and Jerry is annoyed.
Someone who is not obedient and not automatic is always not big and untidy.
If someone who is not big is also annoyed, then he is not automatic.
Someone who is not annoyed is always both automatic and not obedient. | Colin is not big. | self_contradiction |
Amos is big.
Abner is annoyed.
Hadwin is not automatic.
Colin is big.
Colin is not untidy.
Amos is automatic.
Jerry is untidy.
Abner is big.
Colin is not obedient.
Kianna is not dizzy.
Jerry is not big.
Abner is not untidy.Someone is not dizzy and not annoyed if and only if he is not automatic.
If there is at least one people who is not automatic, then Abner is big.
If someone is untidy, then he is not obedient.
If there is someone who is either not big or untidy, then Kianna is not dizzy.
Someone being both not dizzy and not obedient is equivalent to being not annoyed.
Someone who is eithor big or not automatic is always not annoyed.
Kianna is dizzy if and only if Jerry is not annoyed and Gifford is not big.
If someone is both not untidy and automatic, then he is obedient.
If there is at least one people who is not big, then Amos is not obedient and Jerry is annoyed.
Someone who is not obedient and not automatic is always not big and untidy.
If someone who is not big is also annoyed, then he is not automatic.
Someone who is not annoyed is always both automatic and not obedient. | Colin is not dizzy. | entailment |
Amos is big.
Abner is annoyed.
Hadwin is not automatic.
Colin is big.
Colin is not untidy.
Amos is automatic.
Jerry is untidy.
Abner is big.
Colin is not obedient.
Kianna is not dizzy.
Jerry is not big.
Abner is not untidy.Someone is not dizzy and not annoyed if and only if he is not automatic.
If there is at least one people who is not automatic, then Abner is big.
If someone is untidy, then he is not obedient.
If there is someone who is either not big or untidy, then Kianna is not dizzy.
Someone being both not dizzy and not obedient is equivalent to being not annoyed.
Someone who is eithor big or not automatic is always not annoyed.
Kianna is dizzy if and only if Jerry is not annoyed and Gifford is not big.
If someone is both not untidy and automatic, then he is obedient.
If there is at least one people who is not big, then Amos is not obedient and Jerry is annoyed.
Someone who is not obedient and not automatic is always not big and untidy.
If someone who is not big is also annoyed, then he is not automatic.
Someone who is not annoyed is always both automatic and not obedient. | Kianna is big. | neutral |
Amos is big.
Abner is annoyed.
Hadwin is not automatic.
Colin is big.
Colin is not untidy.
Amos is automatic.
Jerry is untidy.
Abner is big.
Colin is not obedient.
Kianna is not dizzy.
Jerry is not big.
Abner is not untidy.Someone is not dizzy and not annoyed if and only if he is not automatic.
If there is at least one people who is not automatic, then Abner is big.
If someone is untidy, then he is not obedient.
If there is someone who is either not big or untidy, then Kianna is not dizzy.
Someone being both not dizzy and not obedient is equivalent to being not annoyed.
Someone who is eithor big or not automatic is always not annoyed.
Kianna is dizzy if and only if Jerry is not annoyed and Gifford is not big.
If someone is both not untidy and automatic, then he is obedient.
If there is at least one people who is not big, then Amos is not obedient and Jerry is annoyed.
Someone who is not obedient and not automatic is always not big and untidy.
If someone who is not big is also annoyed, then he is not automatic.
Someone who is not annoyed is always both automatic and not obedient. | Amos is not annoyed. | entailment |
Amos is big.
Abner is annoyed.
Hadwin is not automatic.
Colin is big.
Colin is not untidy.
Amos is automatic.
Jerry is untidy.
Abner is big.
Colin is not obedient.
Kianna is not dizzy.
Jerry is not big.
Abner is not untidy.Someone is not dizzy and not annoyed if and only if he is not automatic.
If there is at least one people who is not automatic, then Abner is big.
If someone is untidy, then he is not obedient.
If there is someone who is either not big or untidy, then Kianna is not dizzy.
Someone being both not dizzy and not obedient is equivalent to being not annoyed.
Someone who is eithor big or not automatic is always not annoyed.
Kianna is dizzy if and only if Jerry is not annoyed and Gifford is not big.
If someone is both not untidy and automatic, then he is obedient.
If there is at least one people who is not big, then Amos is not obedient and Jerry is annoyed.
Someone who is not obedient and not automatic is always not big and untidy.
If someone who is not big is also annoyed, then he is not automatic.
Someone who is not annoyed is always both automatic and not obedient. | Kianna is dizzy. | contradiction |
Amos is big.
Abner is annoyed.
Hadwin is not automatic.
Colin is big.
Colin is not untidy.
Amos is automatic.
Jerry is untidy.
Abner is big.
Colin is not obedient.
Kianna is not dizzy.
Jerry is not big.
Abner is not untidy.Someone is not dizzy and not annoyed if and only if he is not automatic.
If there is at least one people who is not automatic, then Abner is big.
If someone is untidy, then he is not obedient.
If there is someone who is either not big or untidy, then Kianna is not dizzy.
Someone being both not dizzy and not obedient is equivalent to being not annoyed.
Someone who is eithor big or not automatic is always not annoyed.
Kianna is dizzy if and only if Jerry is not annoyed and Gifford is not big.
If someone is both not untidy and automatic, then he is obedient.
If there is at least one people who is not big, then Amos is not obedient and Jerry is annoyed.
Someone who is not obedient and not automatic is always not big and untidy.
If someone who is not big is also annoyed, then he is not automatic.
Someone who is not annoyed is always both automatic and not obedient. | Amos is obedient. | contradiction |
Amos is big.
Abner is annoyed.
Hadwin is not automatic.
Colin is big.
Colin is not untidy.
Amos is automatic.
Jerry is untidy.
Abner is big.
Colin is not obedient.
Kianna is not dizzy.
Jerry is not big.
Abner is not untidy.Someone is not dizzy and not annoyed if and only if he is not automatic.
If there is at least one people who is not automatic, then Abner is big.
If someone is untidy, then he is not obedient.
If there is someone who is either not big or untidy, then Kianna is not dizzy.
Someone being both not dizzy and not obedient is equivalent to being not annoyed.
Someone who is eithor big or not automatic is always not annoyed.
Kianna is dizzy if and only if Jerry is not annoyed and Gifford is not big.
If someone is both not untidy and automatic, then he is obedient.
If there is at least one people who is not big, then Amos is not obedient and Jerry is annoyed.
Someone who is not obedient and not automatic is always not big and untidy.
If someone who is not big is also annoyed, then he is not automatic.
Someone who is not annoyed is always both automatic and not obedient. | Kianna is not dizzy. | entailment |
Amos is big.
Abner is annoyed.
Hadwin is not automatic.
Colin is big.
Colin is not untidy.
Amos is automatic.
Jerry is untidy.
Abner is big.
Colin is not obedient.
Kianna is not dizzy.
Jerry is not big.
Abner is not untidy.Someone is not dizzy and not annoyed if and only if he is not automatic.
If there is at least one people who is not automatic, then Abner is big.
If someone is untidy, then he is not obedient.
If there is someone who is either not big or untidy, then Kianna is not dizzy.
Someone being both not dizzy and not obedient is equivalent to being not annoyed.
Someone who is eithor big or not automatic is always not annoyed.
Kianna is dizzy if and only if Jerry is not annoyed and Gifford is not big.
If someone is both not untidy and automatic, then he is obedient.
If there is at least one people who is not big, then Amos is not obedient and Jerry is annoyed.
Someone who is not obedient and not automatic is always not big and untidy.
If someone who is not big is also annoyed, then he is not automatic.
Someone who is not annoyed is always both automatic and not obedient. | Jerry is big. | contradiction |
Amos is big.
Abner is annoyed.
Hadwin is not automatic.
Colin is big.
Colin is not untidy.
Amos is automatic.
Jerry is untidy.
Abner is big.
Colin is not obedient.
Kianna is not dizzy.
Jerry is not big.
Abner is not untidy.Someone is not dizzy and not annoyed if and only if he is not automatic.
If there is at least one people who is not automatic, then Abner is big.
If someone is untidy, then he is not obedient.
If there is someone who is either not big or untidy, then Kianna is not dizzy.
Someone being both not dizzy and not obedient is equivalent to being not annoyed.
Someone who is eithor big or not automatic is always not annoyed.
Kianna is dizzy if and only if Jerry is not annoyed and Gifford is not big.
If someone is both not untidy and automatic, then he is obedient.
If there is at least one people who is not big, then Amos is not obedient and Jerry is annoyed.
Someone who is not obedient and not automatic is always not big and untidy.
If someone who is not big is also annoyed, then he is not automatic.
Someone who is not annoyed is always both automatic and not obedient. | Gifford is automatic. | neutral |
Amos is big.
Abner is annoyed.
Hadwin is not automatic.
Colin is big.
Colin is not untidy.
Amos is automatic.
Jerry is untidy.
Abner is big.
Colin is not obedient.
Kianna is not dizzy.
Jerry is not big.
Abner is not untidy.Someone is not dizzy and not annoyed if and only if he is not automatic.
If there is at least one people who is not automatic, then Abner is big.
If someone is untidy, then he is not obedient.
If there is someone who is either not big or untidy, then Kianna is not dizzy.
Someone being both not dizzy and not obedient is equivalent to being not annoyed.
Someone who is eithor big or not automatic is always not annoyed.
Kianna is dizzy if and only if Jerry is not annoyed and Gifford is not big.
If someone is both not untidy and automatic, then he is obedient.
If there is at least one people who is not big, then Amos is not obedient and Jerry is annoyed.
Someone who is not obedient and not automatic is always not big and untidy.
If someone who is not big is also annoyed, then he is not automatic.
Someone who is not annoyed is always both automatic and not obedient. | Gifford is not dizzy. | neutral |
Amos is big.
Abner is annoyed.
Hadwin is not automatic.
Colin is big.
Colin is not untidy.
Amos is automatic.
Jerry is untidy.
Abner is big.
Colin is not obedient.
Kianna is not dizzy.
Jerry is not big.
Abner is not untidy.Someone is not dizzy and not annoyed if and only if he is not automatic.
If there is at least one people who is not automatic, then Abner is big.
If someone is untidy, then he is not obedient.
If there is someone who is either not big or untidy, then Kianna is not dizzy.
Someone being both not dizzy and not obedient is equivalent to being not annoyed.
Someone who is eithor big or not automatic is always not annoyed.
Kianna is dizzy if and only if Jerry is not annoyed and Gifford is not big.
If someone is both not untidy and automatic, then he is obedient.
If there is at least one people who is not big, then Amos is not obedient and Jerry is annoyed.
Someone who is not obedient and not automatic is always not big and untidy.
If someone who is not big is also annoyed, then he is not automatic.
Someone who is not annoyed is always both automatic and not obedient. | Amos is not big. | self_contradiction |
Carolina is powerful.
Janet is not helpless.
Janet is powerful.
Mark is not desperate.
Mark is blue-eyed.
Irvin is not powerful.
Janet is not blue-eyed.
Mark is powerful.
Janet is not terrible.
Blanche is powerful.
Marion is desperate.
Blanche is not easy.If there is someone who is blue-eyed, then Janet is not terrible.
If there is someone who is either not desperate or helpless, then Janet is not powerful.
If there is at least one people who is easy, then Mark is helpless.
If someone is not blue-eyed, then he is both not desperate and not helpless.
If Blanche is easy, then Blanche is powerful, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both desperate and not powerful, then Blanche is blue-eyed.
If Mark is powerful, then Janet is not helpless.
Someone is terrible and not desperate if and only if he is helpless and not easy.
Someone being both not desperate and terrible is equivalent to being not easy.
If Clark is not easy and Mark is powerful, then Marion is helpless.
Someone is not helpless if and only if he is powerful.
If there is someone who is both not desperate and helpless, then Clark is easy. | Irvin is blue-eyed. | neutral |
Carolina is powerful.
Janet is not helpless.
Janet is powerful.
Mark is not desperate.
Mark is blue-eyed.
Irvin is not powerful.
Janet is not blue-eyed.
Mark is powerful.
Janet is not terrible.
Blanche is powerful.
Marion is desperate.
Blanche is not easy.If there is someone who is blue-eyed, then Janet is not terrible.
If there is someone who is either not desperate or helpless, then Janet is not powerful.
If there is at least one people who is easy, then Mark is helpless.
If someone is not blue-eyed, then he is both not desperate and not helpless.
If Blanche is easy, then Blanche is powerful, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both desperate and not powerful, then Blanche is blue-eyed.
If Mark is powerful, then Janet is not helpless.
Someone is terrible and not desperate if and only if he is helpless and not easy.
Someone being both not desperate and terrible is equivalent to being not easy.
If Clark is not easy and Mark is powerful, then Marion is helpless.
Someone is not helpless if and only if he is powerful.
If there is someone who is both not desperate and helpless, then Clark is easy. | Clark is not powerful. | neutral |
Carolina is powerful.
Janet is not helpless.
Janet is powerful.
Mark is not desperate.
Mark is blue-eyed.
Irvin is not powerful.
Janet is not blue-eyed.
Mark is powerful.
Janet is not terrible.
Blanche is powerful.
Marion is desperate.
Blanche is not easy.If there is someone who is blue-eyed, then Janet is not terrible.
If there is someone who is either not desperate or helpless, then Janet is not powerful.
If there is at least one people who is easy, then Mark is helpless.
If someone is not blue-eyed, then he is both not desperate and not helpless.
If Blanche is easy, then Blanche is powerful, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both desperate and not powerful, then Blanche is blue-eyed.
If Mark is powerful, then Janet is not helpless.
Someone is terrible and not desperate if and only if he is helpless and not easy.
Someone being both not desperate and terrible is equivalent to being not easy.
If Clark is not easy and Mark is powerful, then Marion is helpless.
Someone is not helpless if and only if he is powerful.
If there is someone who is both not desperate and helpless, then Clark is easy. | Janet is desperate. | contradiction |
Carolina is powerful.
Janet is not helpless.
Janet is powerful.
Mark is not desperate.
Mark is blue-eyed.
Irvin is not powerful.
Janet is not blue-eyed.
Mark is powerful.
Janet is not terrible.
Blanche is powerful.
Marion is desperate.
Blanche is not easy.If there is someone who is blue-eyed, then Janet is not terrible.
If there is someone who is either not desperate or helpless, then Janet is not powerful.
If there is at least one people who is easy, then Mark is helpless.
If someone is not blue-eyed, then he is both not desperate and not helpless.
If Blanche is easy, then Blanche is powerful, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both desperate and not powerful, then Blanche is blue-eyed.
If Mark is powerful, then Janet is not helpless.
Someone is terrible and not desperate if and only if he is helpless and not easy.
Someone being both not desperate and terrible is equivalent to being not easy.
If Clark is not easy and Mark is powerful, then Marion is helpless.
Someone is not helpless if and only if he is powerful.
If there is someone who is both not desperate and helpless, then Clark is easy. | Mark is not blue-eyed. | contradiction |
Carolina is powerful.
Janet is not helpless.
Janet is powerful.
Mark is not desperate.
Mark is blue-eyed.
Irvin is not powerful.
Janet is not blue-eyed.
Mark is powerful.
Janet is not terrible.
Blanche is powerful.
Marion is desperate.
Blanche is not easy.If there is someone who is blue-eyed, then Janet is not terrible.
If there is someone who is either not desperate or helpless, then Janet is not powerful.
If there is at least one people who is easy, then Mark is helpless.
If someone is not blue-eyed, then he is both not desperate and not helpless.
If Blanche is easy, then Blanche is powerful, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both desperate and not powerful, then Blanche is blue-eyed.
If Mark is powerful, then Janet is not helpless.
Someone is terrible and not desperate if and only if he is helpless and not easy.
Someone being both not desperate and terrible is equivalent to being not easy.
If Clark is not easy and Mark is powerful, then Marion is helpless.
Someone is not helpless if and only if he is powerful.
If there is someone who is both not desperate and helpless, then Clark is easy. | Blanche is helpless. | self_contradiction |
Carolina is powerful.
Janet is not helpless.
Janet is powerful.
Mark is not desperate.
Mark is blue-eyed.
Irvin is not powerful.
Janet is not blue-eyed.
Mark is powerful.
Janet is not terrible.
Blanche is powerful.
Marion is desperate.
Blanche is not easy.If there is someone who is blue-eyed, then Janet is not terrible.
If there is someone who is either not desperate or helpless, then Janet is not powerful.
If there is at least one people who is easy, then Mark is helpless.
If someone is not blue-eyed, then he is both not desperate and not helpless.
If Blanche is easy, then Blanche is powerful, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both desperate and not powerful, then Blanche is blue-eyed.
If Mark is powerful, then Janet is not helpless.
Someone is terrible and not desperate if and only if he is helpless and not easy.
Someone being both not desperate and terrible is equivalent to being not easy.
If Clark is not easy and Mark is powerful, then Marion is helpless.
Someone is not helpless if and only if he is powerful.
If there is someone who is both not desperate and helpless, then Clark is easy. | Blanche is not helpless. | self_contradiction |
Carolina is powerful.
Janet is not helpless.
Janet is powerful.
Mark is not desperate.
Mark is blue-eyed.
Irvin is not powerful.
Janet is not blue-eyed.
Mark is powerful.
Janet is not terrible.
Blanche is powerful.
Marion is desperate.
Blanche is not easy.If there is someone who is blue-eyed, then Janet is not terrible.
If there is someone who is either not desperate or helpless, then Janet is not powerful.
If there is at least one people who is easy, then Mark is helpless.
If someone is not blue-eyed, then he is both not desperate and not helpless.
If Blanche is easy, then Blanche is powerful, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both desperate and not powerful, then Blanche is blue-eyed.
If Mark is powerful, then Janet is not helpless.
Someone is terrible and not desperate if and only if he is helpless and not easy.
Someone being both not desperate and terrible is equivalent to being not easy.
If Clark is not easy and Mark is powerful, then Marion is helpless.
Someone is not helpless if and only if he is powerful.
If there is someone who is both not desperate and helpless, then Clark is easy. | Carolina is not blue-eyed. | neutral |
Carolina is powerful.
Janet is not helpless.
Janet is powerful.
Mark is not desperate.
Mark is blue-eyed.
Irvin is not powerful.
Janet is not blue-eyed.
Mark is powerful.
Janet is not terrible.
Blanche is powerful.
Marion is desperate.
Blanche is not easy.If there is someone who is blue-eyed, then Janet is not terrible.
If there is someone who is either not desperate or helpless, then Janet is not powerful.
If there is at least one people who is easy, then Mark is helpless.
If someone is not blue-eyed, then he is both not desperate and not helpless.
If Blanche is easy, then Blanche is powerful, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both desperate and not powerful, then Blanche is blue-eyed.
If Mark is powerful, then Janet is not helpless.
Someone is terrible and not desperate if and only if he is helpless and not easy.
Someone being both not desperate and terrible is equivalent to being not easy.
If Clark is not easy and Mark is powerful, then Marion is helpless.
Someone is not helpless if and only if he is powerful.
If there is someone who is both not desperate and helpless, then Clark is easy. | Marion is desperate. | entailment |
Carolina is powerful.
Janet is not helpless.
Janet is powerful.
Mark is not desperate.
Mark is blue-eyed.
Irvin is not powerful.
Janet is not blue-eyed.
Mark is powerful.
Janet is not terrible.
Blanche is powerful.
Marion is desperate.
Blanche is not easy.If there is someone who is blue-eyed, then Janet is not terrible.
If there is someone who is either not desperate or helpless, then Janet is not powerful.
If there is at least one people who is easy, then Mark is helpless.
If someone is not blue-eyed, then he is both not desperate and not helpless.
If Blanche is easy, then Blanche is powerful, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both desperate and not powerful, then Blanche is blue-eyed.
If Mark is powerful, then Janet is not helpless.
Someone is terrible and not desperate if and only if he is helpless and not easy.
Someone being both not desperate and terrible is equivalent to being not easy.
If Clark is not easy and Mark is powerful, then Marion is helpless.
Someone is not helpless if and only if he is powerful.
If there is someone who is both not desperate and helpless, then Clark is easy. | Irvin is powerful. | contradiction |
Carolina is powerful.
Janet is not helpless.
Janet is powerful.
Mark is not desperate.
Mark is blue-eyed.
Irvin is not powerful.
Janet is not blue-eyed.
Mark is powerful.
Janet is not terrible.
Blanche is powerful.
Marion is desperate.
Blanche is not easy.If there is someone who is blue-eyed, then Janet is not terrible.
If there is someone who is either not desperate or helpless, then Janet is not powerful.
If there is at least one people who is easy, then Mark is helpless.
If someone is not blue-eyed, then he is both not desperate and not helpless.
If Blanche is easy, then Blanche is powerful, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both desperate and not powerful, then Blanche is blue-eyed.
If Mark is powerful, then Janet is not helpless.
Someone is terrible and not desperate if and only if he is helpless and not easy.
Someone being both not desperate and terrible is equivalent to being not easy.
If Clark is not easy and Mark is powerful, then Marion is helpless.
Someone is not helpless if and only if he is powerful.
If there is someone who is both not desperate and helpless, then Clark is easy. | Carolina is easy. | neutral |
Carolina is powerful.
Janet is not helpless.
Janet is powerful.
Mark is not desperate.
Mark is blue-eyed.
Irvin is not powerful.
Janet is not blue-eyed.
Mark is powerful.
Janet is not terrible.
Blanche is powerful.
Marion is desperate.
Blanche is not easy.If there is someone who is blue-eyed, then Janet is not terrible.
If there is someone who is either not desperate or helpless, then Janet is not powerful.
If there is at least one people who is easy, then Mark is helpless.
If someone is not blue-eyed, then he is both not desperate and not helpless.
If Blanche is easy, then Blanche is powerful, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both desperate and not powerful, then Blanche is blue-eyed.
If Mark is powerful, then Janet is not helpless.
Someone is terrible and not desperate if and only if he is helpless and not easy.
Someone being both not desperate and terrible is equivalent to being not easy.
If Clark is not easy and Mark is powerful, then Marion is helpless.
Someone is not helpless if and only if he is powerful.
If there is someone who is both not desperate and helpless, then Clark is easy. | Mark is powerful. | entailment |
Carolina is powerful.
Janet is not helpless.
Janet is powerful.
Mark is not desperate.
Mark is blue-eyed.
Irvin is not powerful.
Janet is not blue-eyed.
Mark is powerful.
Janet is not terrible.
Blanche is powerful.
Marion is desperate.
Blanche is not easy.If there is someone who is blue-eyed, then Janet is not terrible.
If there is someone who is either not desperate or helpless, then Janet is not powerful.
If there is at least one people who is easy, then Mark is helpless.
If someone is not blue-eyed, then he is both not desperate and not helpless.
If Blanche is easy, then Blanche is powerful, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both desperate and not powerful, then Blanche is blue-eyed.
If Mark is powerful, then Janet is not helpless.
Someone is terrible and not desperate if and only if he is helpless and not easy.
Someone being both not desperate and terrible is equivalent to being not easy.
If Clark is not easy and Mark is powerful, then Marion is helpless.
Someone is not helpless if and only if he is powerful.
If there is someone who is both not desperate and helpless, then Clark is easy. | Marion is not desperate. | contradiction |
Carolina is powerful.
Janet is not helpless.
Janet is powerful.
Mark is not desperate.
Mark is blue-eyed.
Irvin is not powerful.
Janet is not blue-eyed.
Mark is powerful.
Janet is not terrible.
Blanche is powerful.
Marion is desperate.
Blanche is not easy.If there is someone who is blue-eyed, then Janet is not terrible.
If there is someone who is either not desperate or helpless, then Janet is not powerful.
If there is at least one people who is easy, then Mark is helpless.
If someone is not blue-eyed, then he is both not desperate and not helpless.
If Blanche is easy, then Blanche is powerful, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both desperate and not powerful, then Blanche is blue-eyed.
If Mark is powerful, then Janet is not helpless.
Someone is terrible and not desperate if and only if he is helpless and not easy.
Someone being both not desperate and terrible is equivalent to being not easy.
If Clark is not easy and Mark is powerful, then Marion is helpless.
Someone is not helpless if and only if he is powerful.
If there is someone who is both not desperate and helpless, then Clark is easy. | Blanche is not easy. | self_contradiction |
Carolina is powerful.
Janet is not helpless.
Janet is powerful.
Mark is not desperate.
Mark is blue-eyed.
Irvin is not powerful.
Janet is not blue-eyed.
Mark is powerful.
Janet is not terrible.
Blanche is powerful.
Marion is desperate.
Blanche is not easy.If there is someone who is blue-eyed, then Janet is not terrible.
If there is someone who is either not desperate or helpless, then Janet is not powerful.
If there is at least one people who is easy, then Mark is helpless.
If someone is not blue-eyed, then he is both not desperate and not helpless.
If Blanche is easy, then Blanche is powerful, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both desperate and not powerful, then Blanche is blue-eyed.
If Mark is powerful, then Janet is not helpless.
Someone is terrible and not desperate if and only if he is helpless and not easy.
Someone being both not desperate and terrible is equivalent to being not easy.
If Clark is not easy and Mark is powerful, then Marion is helpless.
Someone is not helpless if and only if he is powerful.
If there is someone who is both not desperate and helpless, then Clark is easy. | Janet is not powerful. | self_contradiction |
Carolina is powerful.
Janet is not helpless.
Janet is powerful.
Mark is not desperate.
Mark is blue-eyed.
Irvin is not powerful.
Janet is not blue-eyed.
Mark is powerful.
Janet is not terrible.
Blanche is powerful.
Marion is desperate.
Blanche is not easy.If there is someone who is blue-eyed, then Janet is not terrible.
If there is someone who is either not desperate or helpless, then Janet is not powerful.
If there is at least one people who is easy, then Mark is helpless.
If someone is not blue-eyed, then he is both not desperate and not helpless.
If Blanche is easy, then Blanche is powerful, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both desperate and not powerful, then Blanche is blue-eyed.
If Mark is powerful, then Janet is not helpless.
Someone is terrible and not desperate if and only if he is helpless and not easy.
Someone being both not desperate and terrible is equivalent to being not easy.
If Clark is not easy and Mark is powerful, then Marion is helpless.
Someone is not helpless if and only if he is powerful.
If there is someone who is both not desperate and helpless, then Clark is easy. | Carolina is not helpless. | entailment |
Carolina is powerful.
Janet is not helpless.
Janet is powerful.
Mark is not desperate.
Mark is blue-eyed.
Irvin is not powerful.
Janet is not blue-eyed.
Mark is powerful.
Janet is not terrible.
Blanche is powerful.
Marion is desperate.
Blanche is not easy.If there is someone who is blue-eyed, then Janet is not terrible.
If there is someone who is either not desperate or helpless, then Janet is not powerful.
If there is at least one people who is easy, then Mark is helpless.
If someone is not blue-eyed, then he is both not desperate and not helpless.
If Blanche is easy, then Blanche is powerful, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both desperate and not powerful, then Blanche is blue-eyed.
If Mark is powerful, then Janet is not helpless.
Someone is terrible and not desperate if and only if he is helpless and not easy.
Someone being both not desperate and terrible is equivalent to being not easy.
If Clark is not easy and Mark is powerful, then Marion is helpless.
Someone is not helpless if and only if he is powerful.
If there is someone who is both not desperate and helpless, then Clark is easy. | Mark is blue-eyed. | entailment |
Carolina is powerful.
Janet is not helpless.
Janet is powerful.
Mark is not desperate.
Mark is blue-eyed.
Irvin is not powerful.
Janet is not blue-eyed.
Mark is powerful.
Janet is not terrible.
Blanche is powerful.
Marion is desperate.
Blanche is not easy.If there is someone who is blue-eyed, then Janet is not terrible.
If there is someone who is either not desperate or helpless, then Janet is not powerful.
If there is at least one people who is easy, then Mark is helpless.
If someone is not blue-eyed, then he is both not desperate and not helpless.
If Blanche is easy, then Blanche is powerful, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both desperate and not powerful, then Blanche is blue-eyed.
If Mark is powerful, then Janet is not helpless.
Someone is terrible and not desperate if and only if he is helpless and not easy.
Someone being both not desperate and terrible is equivalent to being not easy.
If Clark is not easy and Mark is powerful, then Marion is helpless.
Someone is not helpless if and only if he is powerful.
If there is someone who is both not desperate and helpless, then Clark is easy. | Janet is powerful. | self_contradiction |
Carolina is powerful.
Janet is not helpless.
Janet is powerful.
Mark is not desperate.
Mark is blue-eyed.
Irvin is not powerful.
Janet is not blue-eyed.
Mark is powerful.
Janet is not terrible.
Blanche is powerful.
Marion is desperate.
Blanche is not easy.If there is someone who is blue-eyed, then Janet is not terrible.
If there is someone who is either not desperate or helpless, then Janet is not powerful.
If there is at least one people who is easy, then Mark is helpless.
If someone is not blue-eyed, then he is both not desperate and not helpless.
If Blanche is easy, then Blanche is powerful, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both desperate and not powerful, then Blanche is blue-eyed.
If Mark is powerful, then Janet is not helpless.
Someone is terrible and not desperate if and only if he is helpless and not easy.
Someone being both not desperate and terrible is equivalent to being not easy.
If Clark is not easy and Mark is powerful, then Marion is helpless.
Someone is not helpless if and only if he is powerful.
If there is someone who is both not desperate and helpless, then Clark is easy. | Mark is desperate. | contradiction |
Carolina is powerful.
Janet is not helpless.
Janet is powerful.
Mark is not desperate.
Mark is blue-eyed.
Irvin is not powerful.
Janet is not blue-eyed.
Mark is powerful.
Janet is not terrible.
Blanche is powerful.
Marion is desperate.
Blanche is not easy.If there is someone who is blue-eyed, then Janet is not terrible.
If there is someone who is either not desperate or helpless, then Janet is not powerful.
If there is at least one people who is easy, then Mark is helpless.
If someone is not blue-eyed, then he is both not desperate and not helpless.
If Blanche is easy, then Blanche is powerful, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both desperate and not powerful, then Blanche is blue-eyed.
If Mark is powerful, then Janet is not helpless.
Someone is terrible and not desperate if and only if he is helpless and not easy.
Someone being both not desperate and terrible is equivalent to being not easy.
If Clark is not easy and Mark is powerful, then Marion is helpless.
Someone is not helpless if and only if he is powerful.
If there is someone who is both not desperate and helpless, then Clark is easy. | Janet is not helpless. | entailment |
Carolina is powerful.
Janet is not helpless.
Janet is powerful.
Mark is not desperate.
Mark is blue-eyed.
Irvin is not powerful.
Janet is not blue-eyed.
Mark is powerful.
Janet is not terrible.
Blanche is powerful.
Marion is desperate.
Blanche is not easy.If there is someone who is blue-eyed, then Janet is not terrible.
If there is someone who is either not desperate or helpless, then Janet is not powerful.
If there is at least one people who is easy, then Mark is helpless.
If someone is not blue-eyed, then he is both not desperate and not helpless.
If Blanche is easy, then Blanche is powerful, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both desperate and not powerful, then Blanche is blue-eyed.
If Mark is powerful, then Janet is not helpless.
Someone is terrible and not desperate if and only if he is helpless and not easy.
Someone being both not desperate and terrible is equivalent to being not easy.
If Clark is not easy and Mark is powerful, then Marion is helpless.
Someone is not helpless if and only if he is powerful.
If there is someone who is both not desperate and helpless, then Clark is easy. | Clark is not easy. | neutral |
Avery is accurate.
Albert is not basic.
Rupert is neat.
Jonathan is not neat.
Jonathan is outstanding.
Baird is basic.
Gifford is accurate.
Jonathan is lucky.
Tyler is not basic.
Albert is not accurate.
Jonathan is basic.
Albert is neat.Avery is lucky if and only if Albert is not neat and Rupert is not basic.
Someone being both lucky and not accurate is equivalent to being outstanding.
If someone is neat and not lucky, then he is both rich and not accurate, and vice versa.
Rupert being not neat and Albert being not accurate imply that Tyler is rich.
Someone being both not neat and lucky is equivalent to being accurate and not rich.
Tyler being not rich or Tyler being basic implies that Jonathan is accurate.
Rupert being not accurate is equivalent to Jonathan being not basic.
If someone is not rich and outstanding, then he is not lucky and not accurate.
If someone is lucky, then he is basic.
Tyler is not lucky if and only if Baird is not basic and Baird is not accurate.
Someone being not lucky is equivalent to being neat.
Jonathan is neat if and only if Baird is not accurate. | Albert is not lucky. | entailment |
Avery is accurate.
Albert is not basic.
Rupert is neat.
Jonathan is not neat.
Jonathan is outstanding.
Baird is basic.
Gifford is accurate.
Jonathan is lucky.
Tyler is not basic.
Albert is not accurate.
Jonathan is basic.
Albert is neat.Avery is lucky if and only if Albert is not neat and Rupert is not basic.
Someone being both lucky and not accurate is equivalent to being outstanding.
If someone is neat and not lucky, then he is both rich and not accurate, and vice versa.
Rupert being not neat and Albert being not accurate imply that Tyler is rich.
Someone being both not neat and lucky is equivalent to being accurate and not rich.
Tyler being not rich or Tyler being basic implies that Jonathan is accurate.
Rupert being not accurate is equivalent to Jonathan being not basic.
If someone is not rich and outstanding, then he is not lucky and not accurate.
If someone is lucky, then he is basic.
Tyler is not lucky if and only if Baird is not basic and Baird is not accurate.
Someone being not lucky is equivalent to being neat.
Jonathan is neat if and only if Baird is not accurate. | Jonathan is rich. | self_contradiction |
Avery is accurate.
Albert is not basic.
Rupert is neat.
Jonathan is not neat.
Jonathan is outstanding.
Baird is basic.
Gifford is accurate.
Jonathan is lucky.
Tyler is not basic.
Albert is not accurate.
Jonathan is basic.
Albert is neat.Avery is lucky if and only if Albert is not neat and Rupert is not basic.
Someone being both lucky and not accurate is equivalent to being outstanding.
If someone is neat and not lucky, then he is both rich and not accurate, and vice versa.
Rupert being not neat and Albert being not accurate imply that Tyler is rich.
Someone being both not neat and lucky is equivalent to being accurate and not rich.
Tyler being not rich or Tyler being basic implies that Jonathan is accurate.
Rupert being not accurate is equivalent to Jonathan being not basic.
If someone is not rich and outstanding, then he is not lucky and not accurate.
If someone is lucky, then he is basic.
Tyler is not lucky if and only if Baird is not basic and Baird is not accurate.
Someone being not lucky is equivalent to being neat.
Jonathan is neat if and only if Baird is not accurate. | Rupert is rich. | entailment |
Avery is accurate.
Albert is not basic.
Rupert is neat.
Jonathan is not neat.
Jonathan is outstanding.
Baird is basic.
Gifford is accurate.
Jonathan is lucky.
Tyler is not basic.
Albert is not accurate.
Jonathan is basic.
Albert is neat.Avery is lucky if and only if Albert is not neat and Rupert is not basic.
Someone being both lucky and not accurate is equivalent to being outstanding.
If someone is neat and not lucky, then he is both rich and not accurate, and vice versa.
Rupert being not neat and Albert being not accurate imply that Tyler is rich.
Someone being both not neat and lucky is equivalent to being accurate and not rich.
Tyler being not rich or Tyler being basic implies that Jonathan is accurate.
Rupert being not accurate is equivalent to Jonathan being not basic.
If someone is not rich and outstanding, then he is not lucky and not accurate.
If someone is lucky, then he is basic.
Tyler is not lucky if and only if Baird is not basic and Baird is not accurate.
Someone being not lucky is equivalent to being neat.
Jonathan is neat if and only if Baird is not accurate. | Gifford is not lucky. | neutral |
Avery is accurate.
Albert is not basic.
Rupert is neat.
Jonathan is not neat.
Jonathan is outstanding.
Baird is basic.
Gifford is accurate.
Jonathan is lucky.
Tyler is not basic.
Albert is not accurate.
Jonathan is basic.
Albert is neat.Avery is lucky if and only if Albert is not neat and Rupert is not basic.
Someone being both lucky and not accurate is equivalent to being outstanding.
If someone is neat and not lucky, then he is both rich and not accurate, and vice versa.
Rupert being not neat and Albert being not accurate imply that Tyler is rich.
Someone being both not neat and lucky is equivalent to being accurate and not rich.
Tyler being not rich or Tyler being basic implies that Jonathan is accurate.
Rupert being not accurate is equivalent to Jonathan being not basic.
If someone is not rich and outstanding, then he is not lucky and not accurate.
If someone is lucky, then he is basic.
Tyler is not lucky if and only if Baird is not basic and Baird is not accurate.
Someone being not lucky is equivalent to being neat.
Jonathan is neat if and only if Baird is not accurate. | Baird is not rich. | neutral |
Avery is accurate.
Albert is not basic.
Rupert is neat.
Jonathan is not neat.
Jonathan is outstanding.
Baird is basic.
Gifford is accurate.
Jonathan is lucky.
Tyler is not basic.
Albert is not accurate.
Jonathan is basic.
Albert is neat.Avery is lucky if and only if Albert is not neat and Rupert is not basic.
Someone being both lucky and not accurate is equivalent to being outstanding.
If someone is neat and not lucky, then he is both rich and not accurate, and vice versa.
Rupert being not neat and Albert being not accurate imply that Tyler is rich.
Someone being both not neat and lucky is equivalent to being accurate and not rich.
Tyler being not rich or Tyler being basic implies that Jonathan is accurate.
Rupert being not accurate is equivalent to Jonathan being not basic.
If someone is not rich and outstanding, then he is not lucky and not accurate.
If someone is lucky, then he is basic.
Tyler is not lucky if and only if Baird is not basic and Baird is not accurate.
Someone being not lucky is equivalent to being neat.
Jonathan is neat if and only if Baird is not accurate. | Rupert is lucky. | contradiction |
Avery is accurate.
Albert is not basic.
Rupert is neat.
Jonathan is not neat.
Jonathan is outstanding.
Baird is basic.
Gifford is accurate.
Jonathan is lucky.
Tyler is not basic.
Albert is not accurate.
Jonathan is basic.
Albert is neat.Avery is lucky if and only if Albert is not neat and Rupert is not basic.
Someone being both lucky and not accurate is equivalent to being outstanding.
If someone is neat and not lucky, then he is both rich and not accurate, and vice versa.
Rupert being not neat and Albert being not accurate imply that Tyler is rich.
Someone being both not neat and lucky is equivalent to being accurate and not rich.
Tyler being not rich or Tyler being basic implies that Jonathan is accurate.
Rupert being not accurate is equivalent to Jonathan being not basic.
If someone is not rich and outstanding, then he is not lucky and not accurate.
If someone is lucky, then he is basic.
Tyler is not lucky if and only if Baird is not basic and Baird is not accurate.
Someone being not lucky is equivalent to being neat.
Jonathan is neat if and only if Baird is not accurate. | Jonathan is not basic. | self_contradiction |
Avery is accurate.
Albert is not basic.
Rupert is neat.
Jonathan is not neat.
Jonathan is outstanding.
Baird is basic.
Gifford is accurate.
Jonathan is lucky.
Tyler is not basic.
Albert is not accurate.
Jonathan is basic.
Albert is neat.Avery is lucky if and only if Albert is not neat and Rupert is not basic.
Someone being both lucky and not accurate is equivalent to being outstanding.
If someone is neat and not lucky, then he is both rich and not accurate, and vice versa.
Rupert being not neat and Albert being not accurate imply that Tyler is rich.
Someone being both not neat and lucky is equivalent to being accurate and not rich.
Tyler being not rich or Tyler being basic implies that Jonathan is accurate.
Rupert being not accurate is equivalent to Jonathan being not basic.
If someone is not rich and outstanding, then he is not lucky and not accurate.
If someone is lucky, then he is basic.
Tyler is not lucky if and only if Baird is not basic and Baird is not accurate.
Someone being not lucky is equivalent to being neat.
Jonathan is neat if and only if Baird is not accurate. | Gifford is not accurate. | contradiction |
Avery is accurate.
Albert is not basic.
Rupert is neat.
Jonathan is not neat.
Jonathan is outstanding.
Baird is basic.
Gifford is accurate.
Jonathan is lucky.
Tyler is not basic.
Albert is not accurate.
Jonathan is basic.
Albert is neat.Avery is lucky if and only if Albert is not neat and Rupert is not basic.
Someone being both lucky and not accurate is equivalent to being outstanding.
If someone is neat and not lucky, then he is both rich and not accurate, and vice versa.
Rupert being not neat and Albert being not accurate imply that Tyler is rich.
Someone being both not neat and lucky is equivalent to being accurate and not rich.
Tyler being not rich or Tyler being basic implies that Jonathan is accurate.
Rupert being not accurate is equivalent to Jonathan being not basic.
If someone is not rich and outstanding, then he is not lucky and not accurate.
If someone is lucky, then he is basic.
Tyler is not lucky if and only if Baird is not basic and Baird is not accurate.
Someone being not lucky is equivalent to being neat.
Jonathan is neat if and only if Baird is not accurate. | Rupert is neat. | entailment |
Avery is accurate.
Albert is not basic.
Rupert is neat.
Jonathan is not neat.
Jonathan is outstanding.
Baird is basic.
Gifford is accurate.
Jonathan is lucky.
Tyler is not basic.
Albert is not accurate.
Jonathan is basic.
Albert is neat.Avery is lucky if and only if Albert is not neat and Rupert is not basic.
Someone being both lucky and not accurate is equivalent to being outstanding.
If someone is neat and not lucky, then he is both rich and not accurate, and vice versa.
Rupert being not neat and Albert being not accurate imply that Tyler is rich.
Someone being both not neat and lucky is equivalent to being accurate and not rich.
Tyler being not rich or Tyler being basic implies that Jonathan is accurate.
Rupert being not accurate is equivalent to Jonathan being not basic.
If someone is not rich and outstanding, then he is not lucky and not accurate.
If someone is lucky, then he is basic.
Tyler is not lucky if and only if Baird is not basic and Baird is not accurate.
Someone being not lucky is equivalent to being neat.
Jonathan is neat if and only if Baird is not accurate. | Rupert is not neat. | contradiction |
Avery is accurate.
Albert is not basic.
Rupert is neat.
Jonathan is not neat.
Jonathan is outstanding.
Baird is basic.
Gifford is accurate.
Jonathan is lucky.
Tyler is not basic.
Albert is not accurate.
Jonathan is basic.
Albert is neat.Avery is lucky if and only if Albert is not neat and Rupert is not basic.
Someone being both lucky and not accurate is equivalent to being outstanding.
If someone is neat and not lucky, then he is both rich and not accurate, and vice versa.
Rupert being not neat and Albert being not accurate imply that Tyler is rich.
Someone being both not neat and lucky is equivalent to being accurate and not rich.
Tyler being not rich or Tyler being basic implies that Jonathan is accurate.
Rupert being not accurate is equivalent to Jonathan being not basic.
If someone is not rich and outstanding, then he is not lucky and not accurate.
If someone is lucky, then he is basic.
Tyler is not lucky if and only if Baird is not basic and Baird is not accurate.
Someone being not lucky is equivalent to being neat.
Jonathan is neat if and only if Baird is not accurate. | Rupert is not rich. | contradiction |
Avery is accurate.
Albert is not basic.
Rupert is neat.
Jonathan is not neat.
Jonathan is outstanding.
Baird is basic.
Gifford is accurate.
Jonathan is lucky.
Tyler is not basic.
Albert is not accurate.
Jonathan is basic.
Albert is neat.Avery is lucky if and only if Albert is not neat and Rupert is not basic.
Someone being both lucky and not accurate is equivalent to being outstanding.
If someone is neat and not lucky, then he is both rich and not accurate, and vice versa.
Rupert being not neat and Albert being not accurate imply that Tyler is rich.
Someone being both not neat and lucky is equivalent to being accurate and not rich.
Tyler being not rich or Tyler being basic implies that Jonathan is accurate.
Rupert being not accurate is equivalent to Jonathan being not basic.
If someone is not rich and outstanding, then he is not lucky and not accurate.
If someone is lucky, then he is basic.
Tyler is not lucky if and only if Baird is not basic and Baird is not accurate.
Someone being not lucky is equivalent to being neat.
Jonathan is neat if and only if Baird is not accurate. | Rupert is not lucky. | entailment |
Avery is accurate.
Albert is not basic.
Rupert is neat.
Jonathan is not neat.
Jonathan is outstanding.
Baird is basic.
Gifford is accurate.
Jonathan is lucky.
Tyler is not basic.
Albert is not accurate.
Jonathan is basic.
Albert is neat.Avery is lucky if and only if Albert is not neat and Rupert is not basic.
Someone being both lucky and not accurate is equivalent to being outstanding.
If someone is neat and not lucky, then he is both rich and not accurate, and vice versa.
Rupert being not neat and Albert being not accurate imply that Tyler is rich.
Someone being both not neat and lucky is equivalent to being accurate and not rich.
Tyler being not rich or Tyler being basic implies that Jonathan is accurate.
Rupert being not accurate is equivalent to Jonathan being not basic.
If someone is not rich and outstanding, then he is not lucky and not accurate.
If someone is lucky, then he is basic.
Tyler is not lucky if and only if Baird is not basic and Baird is not accurate.
Someone being not lucky is equivalent to being neat.
Jonathan is neat if and only if Baird is not accurate. | Jonathan is accurate. | self_contradiction |
Avery is accurate.
Albert is not basic.
Rupert is neat.
Jonathan is not neat.
Jonathan is outstanding.
Baird is basic.
Gifford is accurate.
Jonathan is lucky.
Tyler is not basic.
Albert is not accurate.
Jonathan is basic.
Albert is neat.Avery is lucky if and only if Albert is not neat and Rupert is not basic.
Someone being both lucky and not accurate is equivalent to being outstanding.
If someone is neat and not lucky, then he is both rich and not accurate, and vice versa.
Rupert being not neat and Albert being not accurate imply that Tyler is rich.
Someone being both not neat and lucky is equivalent to being accurate and not rich.
Tyler being not rich or Tyler being basic implies that Jonathan is accurate.
Rupert being not accurate is equivalent to Jonathan being not basic.
If someone is not rich and outstanding, then he is not lucky and not accurate.
If someone is lucky, then he is basic.
Tyler is not lucky if and only if Baird is not basic and Baird is not accurate.
Someone being not lucky is equivalent to being neat.
Jonathan is neat if and only if Baird is not accurate. | Jonathan is not lucky. | self_contradiction |
Avery is accurate.
Albert is not basic.
Rupert is neat.
Jonathan is not neat.
Jonathan is outstanding.
Baird is basic.
Gifford is accurate.
Jonathan is lucky.
Tyler is not basic.
Albert is not accurate.
Jonathan is basic.
Albert is neat.Avery is lucky if and only if Albert is not neat and Rupert is not basic.
Someone being both lucky and not accurate is equivalent to being outstanding.
If someone is neat and not lucky, then he is both rich and not accurate, and vice versa.
Rupert being not neat and Albert being not accurate imply that Tyler is rich.
Someone being both not neat and lucky is equivalent to being accurate and not rich.
Tyler being not rich or Tyler being basic implies that Jonathan is accurate.
Rupert being not accurate is equivalent to Jonathan being not basic.
If someone is not rich and outstanding, then he is not lucky and not accurate.
If someone is lucky, then he is basic.
Tyler is not lucky if and only if Baird is not basic and Baird is not accurate.
Someone being not lucky is equivalent to being neat.
Jonathan is neat if and only if Baird is not accurate. | Albert is neat. | entailment |
Avery is accurate.
Albert is not basic.
Rupert is neat.
Jonathan is not neat.
Jonathan is outstanding.
Baird is basic.
Gifford is accurate.
Jonathan is lucky.
Tyler is not basic.
Albert is not accurate.
Jonathan is basic.
Albert is neat.Avery is lucky if and only if Albert is not neat and Rupert is not basic.
Someone being both lucky and not accurate is equivalent to being outstanding.
If someone is neat and not lucky, then he is both rich and not accurate, and vice versa.
Rupert being not neat and Albert being not accurate imply that Tyler is rich.
Someone being both not neat and lucky is equivalent to being accurate and not rich.
Tyler being not rich or Tyler being basic implies that Jonathan is accurate.
Rupert being not accurate is equivalent to Jonathan being not basic.
If someone is not rich and outstanding, then he is not lucky and not accurate.
If someone is lucky, then he is basic.
Tyler is not lucky if and only if Baird is not basic and Baird is not accurate.
Someone being not lucky is equivalent to being neat.
Jonathan is neat if and only if Baird is not accurate. | Jonathan is neat. | self_contradiction |
Avery is accurate.
Albert is not basic.
Rupert is neat.
Jonathan is not neat.
Jonathan is outstanding.
Baird is basic.
Gifford is accurate.
Jonathan is lucky.
Tyler is not basic.
Albert is not accurate.
Jonathan is basic.
Albert is neat.Avery is lucky if and only if Albert is not neat and Rupert is not basic.
Someone being both lucky and not accurate is equivalent to being outstanding.
If someone is neat and not lucky, then he is both rich and not accurate, and vice versa.
Rupert being not neat and Albert being not accurate imply that Tyler is rich.
Someone being both not neat and lucky is equivalent to being accurate and not rich.
Tyler being not rich or Tyler being basic implies that Jonathan is accurate.
Rupert being not accurate is equivalent to Jonathan being not basic.
If someone is not rich and outstanding, then he is not lucky and not accurate.
If someone is lucky, then he is basic.
Tyler is not lucky if and only if Baird is not basic and Baird is not accurate.
Someone being not lucky is equivalent to being neat.
Jonathan is neat if and only if Baird is not accurate. | Albert is accurate. | contradiction |
Avery is accurate.
Albert is not basic.
Rupert is neat.
Jonathan is not neat.
Jonathan is outstanding.
Baird is basic.
Gifford is accurate.
Jonathan is lucky.
Tyler is not basic.
Albert is not accurate.
Jonathan is basic.
Albert is neat.Avery is lucky if and only if Albert is not neat and Rupert is not basic.
Someone being both lucky and not accurate is equivalent to being outstanding.
If someone is neat and not lucky, then he is both rich and not accurate, and vice versa.
Rupert being not neat and Albert being not accurate imply that Tyler is rich.
Someone being both not neat and lucky is equivalent to being accurate and not rich.
Tyler being not rich or Tyler being basic implies that Jonathan is accurate.
Rupert being not accurate is equivalent to Jonathan being not basic.
If someone is not rich and outstanding, then he is not lucky and not accurate.
If someone is lucky, then he is basic.
Tyler is not lucky if and only if Baird is not basic and Baird is not accurate.
Someone being not lucky is equivalent to being neat.
Jonathan is neat if and only if Baird is not accurate. | Albert is outstanding. | neutral |
Avery is accurate.
Albert is not basic.
Rupert is neat.
Jonathan is not neat.
Jonathan is outstanding.
Baird is basic.
Gifford is accurate.
Jonathan is lucky.
Tyler is not basic.
Albert is not accurate.
Jonathan is basic.
Albert is neat.Avery is lucky if and only if Albert is not neat and Rupert is not basic.
Someone being both lucky and not accurate is equivalent to being outstanding.
If someone is neat and not lucky, then he is both rich and not accurate, and vice versa.
Rupert being not neat and Albert being not accurate imply that Tyler is rich.
Someone being both not neat and lucky is equivalent to being accurate and not rich.
Tyler being not rich or Tyler being basic implies that Jonathan is accurate.
Rupert being not accurate is equivalent to Jonathan being not basic.
If someone is not rich and outstanding, then he is not lucky and not accurate.
If someone is lucky, then he is basic.
Tyler is not lucky if and only if Baird is not basic and Baird is not accurate.
Someone being not lucky is equivalent to being neat.
Jonathan is neat if and only if Baird is not accurate. | Rupert is not basic. | neutral |
Avery is accurate.
Albert is not basic.
Rupert is neat.
Jonathan is not neat.
Jonathan is outstanding.
Baird is basic.
Gifford is accurate.
Jonathan is lucky.
Tyler is not basic.
Albert is not accurate.
Jonathan is basic.
Albert is neat.Avery is lucky if and only if Albert is not neat and Rupert is not basic.
Someone being both lucky and not accurate is equivalent to being outstanding.
If someone is neat and not lucky, then he is both rich and not accurate, and vice versa.
Rupert being not neat and Albert being not accurate imply that Tyler is rich.
Someone being both not neat and lucky is equivalent to being accurate and not rich.
Tyler being not rich or Tyler being basic implies that Jonathan is accurate.
Rupert being not accurate is equivalent to Jonathan being not basic.
If someone is not rich and outstanding, then he is not lucky and not accurate.
If someone is lucky, then he is basic.
Tyler is not lucky if and only if Baird is not basic and Baird is not accurate.
Someone being not lucky is equivalent to being neat.
Jonathan is neat if and only if Baird is not accurate. | Rupert is outstanding. | neutral |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.