premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Marlin is not sleepy.
Jessie is sleepy.
Theobold is light.
Alberto is friendly.
Hardy is not sleepy.
Jessie is big.
Theobold is friendly.
Theobold is not big.
Phoebe is big.
Theobold is happy.
Hardy is not friendly.
Marlin is determined.If Phoebe is friendly and Phineas is light, then Phineas is big and Phineas is not sleepy, and vice versa.
If someone is not friendly or light, then he is big.
Someone who is determined and not sleepy is always big and light.
If Hardy is determined, then Theobold is friendly and Theobold is not happy, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not sleepy and light is always big.
It can be concluded that Hardy is big once knowing that Alberto is sleepy.
Someone is determined and happy if and only if he is big and not light.
If there is at least one people who is happy, then Phoebe is not determined.
If Theobold is not happy and Jessie is big, then Phoebe is determined.
It can be concluded that Phoebe is sleepy once knowing that Phoebe is light or Phineas is not friendly.
If someone is light, then he is both big and not happy.
If there is someone who is either light or not big, then Alberto is not determined. | Phoebe is big. | entailment |
Marlin is not sleepy.
Jessie is sleepy.
Theobold is light.
Alberto is friendly.
Hardy is not sleepy.
Jessie is big.
Theobold is friendly.
Theobold is not big.
Phoebe is big.
Theobold is happy.
Hardy is not friendly.
Marlin is determined.If Phoebe is friendly and Phineas is light, then Phineas is big and Phineas is not sleepy, and vice versa.
If someone is not friendly or light, then he is big.
Someone who is determined and not sleepy is always big and light.
If Hardy is determined, then Theobold is friendly and Theobold is not happy, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not sleepy and light is always big.
It can be concluded that Hardy is big once knowing that Alberto is sleepy.
Someone is determined and happy if and only if he is big and not light.
If there is at least one people who is happy, then Phoebe is not determined.
If Theobold is not happy and Jessie is big, then Phoebe is determined.
It can be concluded that Phoebe is sleepy once knowing that Phoebe is light or Phineas is not friendly.
If someone is light, then he is both big and not happy.
If there is someone who is either light or not big, then Alberto is not determined. | Phineas is happy. | neutral |
Marlin is not sleepy.
Jessie is sleepy.
Theobold is light.
Alberto is friendly.
Hardy is not sleepy.
Jessie is big.
Theobold is friendly.
Theobold is not big.
Phoebe is big.
Theobold is happy.
Hardy is not friendly.
Marlin is determined.If Phoebe is friendly and Phineas is light, then Phineas is big and Phineas is not sleepy, and vice versa.
If someone is not friendly or light, then he is big.
Someone who is determined and not sleepy is always big and light.
If Hardy is determined, then Theobold is friendly and Theobold is not happy, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not sleepy and light is always big.
It can be concluded that Hardy is big once knowing that Alberto is sleepy.
Someone is determined and happy if and only if he is big and not light.
If there is at least one people who is happy, then Phoebe is not determined.
If Theobold is not happy and Jessie is big, then Phoebe is determined.
It can be concluded that Phoebe is sleepy once knowing that Phoebe is light or Phineas is not friendly.
If someone is light, then he is both big and not happy.
If there is someone who is either light or not big, then Alberto is not determined. | Hardy is happy. | contradiction |
Marlin is not sleepy.
Jessie is sleepy.
Theobold is light.
Alberto is friendly.
Hardy is not sleepy.
Jessie is big.
Theobold is friendly.
Theobold is not big.
Phoebe is big.
Theobold is happy.
Hardy is not friendly.
Marlin is determined.If Phoebe is friendly and Phineas is light, then Phineas is big and Phineas is not sleepy, and vice versa.
If someone is not friendly or light, then he is big.
Someone who is determined and not sleepy is always big and light.
If Hardy is determined, then Theobold is friendly and Theobold is not happy, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not sleepy and light is always big.
It can be concluded that Hardy is big once knowing that Alberto is sleepy.
Someone is determined and happy if and only if he is big and not light.
If there is at least one people who is happy, then Phoebe is not determined.
If Theobold is not happy and Jessie is big, then Phoebe is determined.
It can be concluded that Phoebe is sleepy once knowing that Phoebe is light or Phineas is not friendly.
If someone is light, then he is both big and not happy.
If there is someone who is either light or not big, then Alberto is not determined. | Phineas is friendly. | neutral |
Marlin is not sleepy.
Jessie is sleepy.
Theobold is light.
Alberto is friendly.
Hardy is not sleepy.
Jessie is big.
Theobold is friendly.
Theobold is not big.
Phoebe is big.
Theobold is happy.
Hardy is not friendly.
Marlin is determined.If Phoebe is friendly and Phineas is light, then Phineas is big and Phineas is not sleepy, and vice versa.
If someone is not friendly or light, then he is big.
Someone who is determined and not sleepy is always big and light.
If Hardy is determined, then Theobold is friendly and Theobold is not happy, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not sleepy and light is always big.
It can be concluded that Hardy is big once knowing that Alberto is sleepy.
Someone is determined and happy if and only if he is big and not light.
If there is at least one people who is happy, then Phoebe is not determined.
If Theobold is not happy and Jessie is big, then Phoebe is determined.
It can be concluded that Phoebe is sleepy once knowing that Phoebe is light or Phineas is not friendly.
If someone is light, then he is both big and not happy.
If there is someone who is either light or not big, then Alberto is not determined. | Theobold is not happy. | self_contradiction |
Marlin is not sleepy.
Jessie is sleepy.
Theobold is light.
Alberto is friendly.
Hardy is not sleepy.
Jessie is big.
Theobold is friendly.
Theobold is not big.
Phoebe is big.
Theobold is happy.
Hardy is not friendly.
Marlin is determined.If Phoebe is friendly and Phineas is light, then Phineas is big and Phineas is not sleepy, and vice versa.
If someone is not friendly or light, then he is big.
Someone who is determined and not sleepy is always big and light.
If Hardy is determined, then Theobold is friendly and Theobold is not happy, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not sleepy and light is always big.
It can be concluded that Hardy is big once knowing that Alberto is sleepy.
Someone is determined and happy if and only if he is big and not light.
If there is at least one people who is happy, then Phoebe is not determined.
If Theobold is not happy and Jessie is big, then Phoebe is determined.
It can be concluded that Phoebe is sleepy once knowing that Phoebe is light or Phineas is not friendly.
If someone is light, then he is both big and not happy.
If there is someone who is either light or not big, then Alberto is not determined. | Hardy is not sleepy. | entailment |
Marlin is not sleepy.
Jessie is sleepy.
Theobold is light.
Alberto is friendly.
Hardy is not sleepy.
Jessie is big.
Theobold is friendly.
Theobold is not big.
Phoebe is big.
Theobold is happy.
Hardy is not friendly.
Marlin is determined.If Phoebe is friendly and Phineas is light, then Phineas is big and Phineas is not sleepy, and vice versa.
If someone is not friendly or light, then he is big.
Someone who is determined and not sleepy is always big and light.
If Hardy is determined, then Theobold is friendly and Theobold is not happy, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not sleepy and light is always big.
It can be concluded that Hardy is big once knowing that Alberto is sleepy.
Someone is determined and happy if and only if he is big and not light.
If there is at least one people who is happy, then Phoebe is not determined.
If Theobold is not happy and Jessie is big, then Phoebe is determined.
It can be concluded that Phoebe is sleepy once knowing that Phoebe is light or Phineas is not friendly.
If someone is light, then he is both big and not happy.
If there is someone who is either light or not big, then Alberto is not determined. | Theobold is not big. | self_contradiction |
Marlin is not sleepy.
Jessie is sleepy.
Theobold is light.
Alberto is friendly.
Hardy is not sleepy.
Jessie is big.
Theobold is friendly.
Theobold is not big.
Phoebe is big.
Theobold is happy.
Hardy is not friendly.
Marlin is determined.If Phoebe is friendly and Phineas is light, then Phineas is big and Phineas is not sleepy, and vice versa.
If someone is not friendly or light, then he is big.
Someone who is determined and not sleepy is always big and light.
If Hardy is determined, then Theobold is friendly and Theobold is not happy, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not sleepy and light is always big.
It can be concluded that Hardy is big once knowing that Alberto is sleepy.
Someone is determined and happy if and only if he is big and not light.
If there is at least one people who is happy, then Phoebe is not determined.
If Theobold is not happy and Jessie is big, then Phoebe is determined.
It can be concluded that Phoebe is sleepy once knowing that Phoebe is light or Phineas is not friendly.
If someone is light, then he is both big and not happy.
If there is someone who is either light or not big, then Alberto is not determined. | Theobold is big. | self_contradiction |
Marlin is not sleepy.
Jessie is sleepy.
Theobold is light.
Alberto is friendly.
Hardy is not sleepy.
Jessie is big.
Theobold is friendly.
Theobold is not big.
Phoebe is big.
Theobold is happy.
Hardy is not friendly.
Marlin is determined.If Phoebe is friendly and Phineas is light, then Phineas is big and Phineas is not sleepy, and vice versa.
If someone is not friendly or light, then he is big.
Someone who is determined and not sleepy is always big and light.
If Hardy is determined, then Theobold is friendly and Theobold is not happy, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not sleepy and light is always big.
It can be concluded that Hardy is big once knowing that Alberto is sleepy.
Someone is determined and happy if and only if he is big and not light.
If there is at least one people who is happy, then Phoebe is not determined.
If Theobold is not happy and Jessie is big, then Phoebe is determined.
It can be concluded that Phoebe is sleepy once knowing that Phoebe is light or Phineas is not friendly.
If someone is light, then he is both big and not happy.
If there is someone who is either light or not big, then Alberto is not determined. | Theobold is happy. | self_contradiction |
Marlin is not sleepy.
Jessie is sleepy.
Theobold is light.
Alberto is friendly.
Hardy is not sleepy.
Jessie is big.
Theobold is friendly.
Theobold is not big.
Phoebe is big.
Theobold is happy.
Hardy is not friendly.
Marlin is determined.If Phoebe is friendly and Phineas is light, then Phineas is big and Phineas is not sleepy, and vice versa.
If someone is not friendly or light, then he is big.
Someone who is determined and not sleepy is always big and light.
If Hardy is determined, then Theobold is friendly and Theobold is not happy, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not sleepy and light is always big.
It can be concluded that Hardy is big once knowing that Alberto is sleepy.
Someone is determined and happy if and only if he is big and not light.
If there is at least one people who is happy, then Phoebe is not determined.
If Theobold is not happy and Jessie is big, then Phoebe is determined.
It can be concluded that Phoebe is sleepy once knowing that Phoebe is light or Phineas is not friendly.
If someone is light, then he is both big and not happy.
If there is someone who is either light or not big, then Alberto is not determined. | Alberto is not big. | neutral |
Marlin is not sleepy.
Jessie is sleepy.
Theobold is light.
Alberto is friendly.
Hardy is not sleepy.
Jessie is big.
Theobold is friendly.
Theobold is not big.
Phoebe is big.
Theobold is happy.
Hardy is not friendly.
Marlin is determined.If Phoebe is friendly and Phineas is light, then Phineas is big and Phineas is not sleepy, and vice versa.
If someone is not friendly or light, then he is big.
Someone who is determined and not sleepy is always big and light.
If Hardy is determined, then Theobold is friendly and Theobold is not happy, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not sleepy and light is always big.
It can be concluded that Hardy is big once knowing that Alberto is sleepy.
Someone is determined and happy if and only if he is big and not light.
If there is at least one people who is happy, then Phoebe is not determined.
If Theobold is not happy and Jessie is big, then Phoebe is determined.
It can be concluded that Phoebe is sleepy once knowing that Phoebe is light or Phineas is not friendly.
If someone is light, then he is both big and not happy.
If there is someone who is either light or not big, then Alberto is not determined. | Marlin is happy. | contradiction |
Marlin is not sleepy.
Jessie is sleepy.
Theobold is light.
Alberto is friendly.
Hardy is not sleepy.
Jessie is big.
Theobold is friendly.
Theobold is not big.
Phoebe is big.
Theobold is happy.
Hardy is not friendly.
Marlin is determined.If Phoebe is friendly and Phineas is light, then Phineas is big and Phineas is not sleepy, and vice versa.
If someone is not friendly or light, then he is big.
Someone who is determined and not sleepy is always big and light.
If Hardy is determined, then Theobold is friendly and Theobold is not happy, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not sleepy and light is always big.
It can be concluded that Hardy is big once knowing that Alberto is sleepy.
Someone is determined and happy if and only if he is big and not light.
If there is at least one people who is happy, then Phoebe is not determined.
If Theobold is not happy and Jessie is big, then Phoebe is determined.
It can be concluded that Phoebe is sleepy once knowing that Phoebe is light or Phineas is not friendly.
If someone is light, then he is both big and not happy.
If there is someone who is either light or not big, then Alberto is not determined. | Alberto is not determined. | entailment |
Marlin is not sleepy.
Jessie is sleepy.
Theobold is light.
Alberto is friendly.
Hardy is not sleepy.
Jessie is big.
Theobold is friendly.
Theobold is not big.
Phoebe is big.
Theobold is happy.
Hardy is not friendly.
Marlin is determined.If Phoebe is friendly and Phineas is light, then Phineas is big and Phineas is not sleepy, and vice versa.
If someone is not friendly or light, then he is big.
Someone who is determined and not sleepy is always big and light.
If Hardy is determined, then Theobold is friendly and Theobold is not happy, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not sleepy and light is always big.
It can be concluded that Hardy is big once knowing that Alberto is sleepy.
Someone is determined and happy if and only if he is big and not light.
If there is at least one people who is happy, then Phoebe is not determined.
If Theobold is not happy and Jessie is big, then Phoebe is determined.
It can be concluded that Phoebe is sleepy once knowing that Phoebe is light or Phineas is not friendly.
If someone is light, then he is both big and not happy.
If there is someone who is either light or not big, then Alberto is not determined. | Marlin is big. | entailment |
Marlin is not sleepy.
Jessie is sleepy.
Theobold is light.
Alberto is friendly.
Hardy is not sleepy.
Jessie is big.
Theobold is friendly.
Theobold is not big.
Phoebe is big.
Theobold is happy.
Hardy is not friendly.
Marlin is determined.If Phoebe is friendly and Phineas is light, then Phineas is big and Phineas is not sleepy, and vice versa.
If someone is not friendly or light, then he is big.
Someone who is determined and not sleepy is always big and light.
If Hardy is determined, then Theobold is friendly and Theobold is not happy, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not sleepy and light is always big.
It can be concluded that Hardy is big once knowing that Alberto is sleepy.
Someone is determined and happy if and only if he is big and not light.
If there is at least one people who is happy, then Phoebe is not determined.
If Theobold is not happy and Jessie is big, then Phoebe is determined.
It can be concluded that Phoebe is sleepy once knowing that Phoebe is light or Phineas is not friendly.
If someone is light, then he is both big and not happy.
If there is someone who is either light or not big, then Alberto is not determined. | Jessie is not friendly. | neutral |
Marlin is not sleepy.
Jessie is sleepy.
Theobold is light.
Alberto is friendly.
Hardy is not sleepy.
Jessie is big.
Theobold is friendly.
Theobold is not big.
Phoebe is big.
Theobold is happy.
Hardy is not friendly.
Marlin is determined.If Phoebe is friendly and Phineas is light, then Phineas is big and Phineas is not sleepy, and vice versa.
If someone is not friendly or light, then he is big.
Someone who is determined and not sleepy is always big and light.
If Hardy is determined, then Theobold is friendly and Theobold is not happy, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not sleepy and light is always big.
It can be concluded that Hardy is big once knowing that Alberto is sleepy.
Someone is determined and happy if and only if he is big and not light.
If there is at least one people who is happy, then Phoebe is not determined.
If Theobold is not happy and Jessie is big, then Phoebe is determined.
It can be concluded that Phoebe is sleepy once knowing that Phoebe is light or Phineas is not friendly.
If someone is light, then he is both big and not happy.
If there is someone who is either light or not big, then Alberto is not determined. | Phoebe is not determined. | self_contradiction |
Marlin is not sleepy.
Jessie is sleepy.
Theobold is light.
Alberto is friendly.
Hardy is not sleepy.
Jessie is big.
Theobold is friendly.
Theobold is not big.
Phoebe is big.
Theobold is happy.
Hardy is not friendly.
Marlin is determined.If Phoebe is friendly and Phineas is light, then Phineas is big and Phineas is not sleepy, and vice versa.
If someone is not friendly or light, then he is big.
Someone who is determined and not sleepy is always big and light.
If Hardy is determined, then Theobold is friendly and Theobold is not happy, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not sleepy and light is always big.
It can be concluded that Hardy is big once knowing that Alberto is sleepy.
Someone is determined and happy if and only if he is big and not light.
If there is at least one people who is happy, then Phoebe is not determined.
If Theobold is not happy and Jessie is big, then Phoebe is determined.
It can be concluded that Phoebe is sleepy once knowing that Phoebe is light or Phineas is not friendly.
If someone is light, then he is both big and not happy.
If there is someone who is either light or not big, then Alberto is not determined. | Marlin is not sleepy. | entailment |
Marlin is not sleepy.
Jessie is sleepy.
Theobold is light.
Alberto is friendly.
Hardy is not sleepy.
Jessie is big.
Theobold is friendly.
Theobold is not big.
Phoebe is big.
Theobold is happy.
Hardy is not friendly.
Marlin is determined.If Phoebe is friendly and Phineas is light, then Phineas is big and Phineas is not sleepy, and vice versa.
If someone is not friendly or light, then he is big.
Someone who is determined and not sleepy is always big and light.
If Hardy is determined, then Theobold is friendly and Theobold is not happy, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not sleepy and light is always big.
It can be concluded that Hardy is big once knowing that Alberto is sleepy.
Someone is determined and happy if and only if he is big and not light.
If there is at least one people who is happy, then Phoebe is not determined.
If Theobold is not happy and Jessie is big, then Phoebe is determined.
It can be concluded that Phoebe is sleepy once knowing that Phoebe is light or Phineas is not friendly.
If someone is light, then he is both big and not happy.
If there is someone who is either light or not big, then Alberto is not determined. | Jessie is not big. | contradiction |
Marlin is not sleepy.
Jessie is sleepy.
Theobold is light.
Alberto is friendly.
Hardy is not sleepy.
Jessie is big.
Theobold is friendly.
Theobold is not big.
Phoebe is big.
Theobold is happy.
Hardy is not friendly.
Marlin is determined.If Phoebe is friendly and Phineas is light, then Phineas is big and Phineas is not sleepy, and vice versa.
If someone is not friendly or light, then he is big.
Someone who is determined and not sleepy is always big and light.
If Hardy is determined, then Theobold is friendly and Theobold is not happy, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not sleepy and light is always big.
It can be concluded that Hardy is big once knowing that Alberto is sleepy.
Someone is determined and happy if and only if he is big and not light.
If there is at least one people who is happy, then Phoebe is not determined.
If Theobold is not happy and Jessie is big, then Phoebe is determined.
It can be concluded that Phoebe is sleepy once knowing that Phoebe is light or Phineas is not friendly.
If someone is light, then he is both big and not happy.
If there is someone who is either light or not big, then Alberto is not determined. | Marlin is not big. | contradiction |
Marlin is not sleepy.
Jessie is sleepy.
Theobold is light.
Alberto is friendly.
Hardy is not sleepy.
Jessie is big.
Theobold is friendly.
Theobold is not big.
Phoebe is big.
Theobold is happy.
Hardy is not friendly.
Marlin is determined.If Phoebe is friendly and Phineas is light, then Phineas is big and Phineas is not sleepy, and vice versa.
If someone is not friendly or light, then he is big.
Someone who is determined and not sleepy is always big and light.
If Hardy is determined, then Theobold is friendly and Theobold is not happy, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not sleepy and light is always big.
It can be concluded that Hardy is big once knowing that Alberto is sleepy.
Someone is determined and happy if and only if he is big and not light.
If there is at least one people who is happy, then Phoebe is not determined.
If Theobold is not happy and Jessie is big, then Phoebe is determined.
It can be concluded that Phoebe is sleepy once knowing that Phoebe is light or Phineas is not friendly.
If someone is light, then he is both big and not happy.
If there is someone who is either light or not big, then Alberto is not determined. | Phoebe is sleepy. | neutral |
Marlin is not sleepy.
Jessie is sleepy.
Theobold is light.
Alberto is friendly.
Hardy is not sleepy.
Jessie is big.
Theobold is friendly.
Theobold is not big.
Phoebe is big.
Theobold is happy.
Hardy is not friendly.
Marlin is determined.If Phoebe is friendly and Phineas is light, then Phineas is big and Phineas is not sleepy, and vice versa.
If someone is not friendly or light, then he is big.
Someone who is determined and not sleepy is always big and light.
If Hardy is determined, then Theobold is friendly and Theobold is not happy, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not sleepy and light is always big.
It can be concluded that Hardy is big once knowing that Alberto is sleepy.
Someone is determined and happy if and only if he is big and not light.
If there is at least one people who is happy, then Phoebe is not determined.
If Theobold is not happy and Jessie is big, then Phoebe is determined.
It can be concluded that Phoebe is sleepy once knowing that Phoebe is light or Phineas is not friendly.
If someone is light, then he is both big and not happy.
If there is someone who is either light or not big, then Alberto is not determined. | Theobold is not friendly. | contradiction |
Marlon is not entire.
Benton is not helpful.
Lionel is not yellow.
Bryant is not healthy.
Lionel is not messy.
Bryant is entire.
Lionel is not helpful.
Marlon is messy.
Bevis is not entire.
Lionel is not healthy.
Lionel is not sweet.
Bevis is not helpful.If Sidney is not sweet and Bevis is messy, then Lionel is not healthy and Bevis is entire.
It can be concluded that Sidney is not healthy once knowing that Marlon is helpful and Marlon is not yellow.
If there is someone who is either messy or helpful, then Sidney is not entire and Bryant is yellow.
If Lionel is helpful, then Sidney is entire, and vice versa.
If someone is not sweet, then he is both yellow and not helpful.
Lionel is not messy if and only if Benton is not helpful and Benton is healthy.
If all people are helpful, then Bevis is not sweet and Lionel is not entire.
As long as someone is yellow, he is sweet and helpful.
Sidney being helpful implies that Marlon is sweet.
If there is someone who is both messy and yellow, then Benton is not helpful.
If someone is not helpful or he is not healthy, then he is messy.
If there is someone who is either messy or sweet, then Benton is helpful. | Bevis is yellow. | neutral |
Marlon is not entire.
Benton is not helpful.
Lionel is not yellow.
Bryant is not healthy.
Lionel is not messy.
Bryant is entire.
Lionel is not helpful.
Marlon is messy.
Bevis is not entire.
Lionel is not healthy.
Lionel is not sweet.
Bevis is not helpful.If Sidney is not sweet and Bevis is messy, then Lionel is not healthy and Bevis is entire.
It can be concluded that Sidney is not healthy once knowing that Marlon is helpful and Marlon is not yellow.
If there is someone who is either messy or helpful, then Sidney is not entire and Bryant is yellow.
If Lionel is helpful, then Sidney is entire, and vice versa.
If someone is not sweet, then he is both yellow and not helpful.
Lionel is not messy if and only if Benton is not helpful and Benton is healthy.
If all people are helpful, then Bevis is not sweet and Lionel is not entire.
As long as someone is yellow, he is sweet and helpful.
Sidney being helpful implies that Marlon is sweet.
If there is someone who is both messy and yellow, then Benton is not helpful.
If someone is not helpful or he is not healthy, then he is messy.
If there is someone who is either messy or sweet, then Benton is helpful. | Lionel is healthy. | contradiction |
Marlon is not entire.
Benton is not helpful.
Lionel is not yellow.
Bryant is not healthy.
Lionel is not messy.
Bryant is entire.
Lionel is not helpful.
Marlon is messy.
Bevis is not entire.
Lionel is not healthy.
Lionel is not sweet.
Bevis is not helpful.If Sidney is not sweet and Bevis is messy, then Lionel is not healthy and Bevis is entire.
It can be concluded that Sidney is not healthy once knowing that Marlon is helpful and Marlon is not yellow.
If there is someone who is either messy or helpful, then Sidney is not entire and Bryant is yellow.
If Lionel is helpful, then Sidney is entire, and vice versa.
If someone is not sweet, then he is both yellow and not helpful.
Lionel is not messy if and only if Benton is not helpful and Benton is healthy.
If all people are helpful, then Bevis is not sweet and Lionel is not entire.
As long as someone is yellow, he is sweet and helpful.
Sidney being helpful implies that Marlon is sweet.
If there is someone who is both messy and yellow, then Benton is not helpful.
If someone is not helpful or he is not healthy, then he is messy.
If there is someone who is either messy or sweet, then Benton is helpful. | Marlon is messy. | entailment |
Marlon is not entire.
Benton is not helpful.
Lionel is not yellow.
Bryant is not healthy.
Lionel is not messy.
Bryant is entire.
Lionel is not helpful.
Marlon is messy.
Bevis is not entire.
Lionel is not healthy.
Lionel is not sweet.
Bevis is not helpful.If Sidney is not sweet and Bevis is messy, then Lionel is not healthy and Bevis is entire.
It can be concluded that Sidney is not healthy once knowing that Marlon is helpful and Marlon is not yellow.
If there is someone who is either messy or helpful, then Sidney is not entire and Bryant is yellow.
If Lionel is helpful, then Sidney is entire, and vice versa.
If someone is not sweet, then he is both yellow and not helpful.
Lionel is not messy if and only if Benton is not helpful and Benton is healthy.
If all people are helpful, then Bevis is not sweet and Lionel is not entire.
As long as someone is yellow, he is sweet and helpful.
Sidney being helpful implies that Marlon is sweet.
If there is someone who is both messy and yellow, then Benton is not helpful.
If someone is not helpful or he is not healthy, then he is messy.
If there is someone who is either messy or sweet, then Benton is helpful. | Marlon is not messy. | contradiction |
Marlon is not entire.
Benton is not helpful.
Lionel is not yellow.
Bryant is not healthy.
Lionel is not messy.
Bryant is entire.
Lionel is not helpful.
Marlon is messy.
Bevis is not entire.
Lionel is not healthy.
Lionel is not sweet.
Bevis is not helpful.If Sidney is not sweet and Bevis is messy, then Lionel is not healthy and Bevis is entire.
It can be concluded that Sidney is not healthy once knowing that Marlon is helpful and Marlon is not yellow.
If there is someone who is either messy or helpful, then Sidney is not entire and Bryant is yellow.
If Lionel is helpful, then Sidney is entire, and vice versa.
If someone is not sweet, then he is both yellow and not helpful.
Lionel is not messy if and only if Benton is not helpful and Benton is healthy.
If all people are helpful, then Bevis is not sweet and Lionel is not entire.
As long as someone is yellow, he is sweet and helpful.
Sidney being helpful implies that Marlon is sweet.
If there is someone who is both messy and yellow, then Benton is not helpful.
If someone is not helpful or he is not healthy, then he is messy.
If there is someone who is either messy or sweet, then Benton is helpful. | Bryant is healthy. | contradiction |
Marlon is not entire.
Benton is not helpful.
Lionel is not yellow.
Bryant is not healthy.
Lionel is not messy.
Bryant is entire.
Lionel is not helpful.
Marlon is messy.
Bevis is not entire.
Lionel is not healthy.
Lionel is not sweet.
Bevis is not helpful.If Sidney is not sweet and Bevis is messy, then Lionel is not healthy and Bevis is entire.
It can be concluded that Sidney is not healthy once knowing that Marlon is helpful and Marlon is not yellow.
If there is someone who is either messy or helpful, then Sidney is not entire and Bryant is yellow.
If Lionel is helpful, then Sidney is entire, and vice versa.
If someone is not sweet, then he is both yellow and not helpful.
Lionel is not messy if and only if Benton is not helpful and Benton is healthy.
If all people are helpful, then Bevis is not sweet and Lionel is not entire.
As long as someone is yellow, he is sweet and helpful.
Sidney being helpful implies that Marlon is sweet.
If there is someone who is both messy and yellow, then Benton is not helpful.
If someone is not helpful or he is not healthy, then he is messy.
If there is someone who is either messy or sweet, then Benton is helpful. | Bryant is yellow. | entailment |
Marlon is not entire.
Benton is not helpful.
Lionel is not yellow.
Bryant is not healthy.
Lionel is not messy.
Bryant is entire.
Lionel is not helpful.
Marlon is messy.
Bevis is not entire.
Lionel is not healthy.
Lionel is not sweet.
Bevis is not helpful.If Sidney is not sweet and Bevis is messy, then Lionel is not healthy and Bevis is entire.
It can be concluded that Sidney is not healthy once knowing that Marlon is helpful and Marlon is not yellow.
If there is someone who is either messy or helpful, then Sidney is not entire and Bryant is yellow.
If Lionel is helpful, then Sidney is entire, and vice versa.
If someone is not sweet, then he is both yellow and not helpful.
Lionel is not messy if and only if Benton is not helpful and Benton is healthy.
If all people are helpful, then Bevis is not sweet and Lionel is not entire.
As long as someone is yellow, he is sweet and helpful.
Sidney being helpful implies that Marlon is sweet.
If there is someone who is both messy and yellow, then Benton is not helpful.
If someone is not helpful or he is not healthy, then he is messy.
If there is someone who is either messy or sweet, then Benton is helpful. | Bud is not messy. | neutral |
Marlon is not entire.
Benton is not helpful.
Lionel is not yellow.
Bryant is not healthy.
Lionel is not messy.
Bryant is entire.
Lionel is not helpful.
Marlon is messy.
Bevis is not entire.
Lionel is not healthy.
Lionel is not sweet.
Bevis is not helpful.If Sidney is not sweet and Bevis is messy, then Lionel is not healthy and Bevis is entire.
It can be concluded that Sidney is not healthy once knowing that Marlon is helpful and Marlon is not yellow.
If there is someone who is either messy or helpful, then Sidney is not entire and Bryant is yellow.
If Lionel is helpful, then Sidney is entire, and vice versa.
If someone is not sweet, then he is both yellow and not helpful.
Lionel is not messy if and only if Benton is not helpful and Benton is healthy.
If all people are helpful, then Bevis is not sweet and Lionel is not entire.
As long as someone is yellow, he is sweet and helpful.
Sidney being helpful implies that Marlon is sweet.
If there is someone who is both messy and yellow, then Benton is not helpful.
If someone is not helpful or he is not healthy, then he is messy.
If there is someone who is either messy or sweet, then Benton is helpful. | Lionel is not healthy. | entailment |
Marlon is not entire.
Benton is not helpful.
Lionel is not yellow.
Bryant is not healthy.
Lionel is not messy.
Bryant is entire.
Lionel is not helpful.
Marlon is messy.
Bevis is not entire.
Lionel is not healthy.
Lionel is not sweet.
Bevis is not helpful.If Sidney is not sweet and Bevis is messy, then Lionel is not healthy and Bevis is entire.
It can be concluded that Sidney is not healthy once knowing that Marlon is helpful and Marlon is not yellow.
If there is someone who is either messy or helpful, then Sidney is not entire and Bryant is yellow.
If Lionel is helpful, then Sidney is entire, and vice versa.
If someone is not sweet, then he is both yellow and not helpful.
Lionel is not messy if and only if Benton is not helpful and Benton is healthy.
If all people are helpful, then Bevis is not sweet and Lionel is not entire.
As long as someone is yellow, he is sweet and helpful.
Sidney being helpful implies that Marlon is sweet.
If there is someone who is both messy and yellow, then Benton is not helpful.
If someone is not helpful or he is not healthy, then he is messy.
If there is someone who is either messy or sweet, then Benton is helpful. | Benton is not helpful. | self_contradiction |
Marlon is not entire.
Benton is not helpful.
Lionel is not yellow.
Bryant is not healthy.
Lionel is not messy.
Bryant is entire.
Lionel is not helpful.
Marlon is messy.
Bevis is not entire.
Lionel is not healthy.
Lionel is not sweet.
Bevis is not helpful.If Sidney is not sweet and Bevis is messy, then Lionel is not healthy and Bevis is entire.
It can be concluded that Sidney is not healthy once knowing that Marlon is helpful and Marlon is not yellow.
If there is someone who is either messy or helpful, then Sidney is not entire and Bryant is yellow.
If Lionel is helpful, then Sidney is entire, and vice versa.
If someone is not sweet, then he is both yellow and not helpful.
Lionel is not messy if and only if Benton is not helpful and Benton is healthy.
If all people are helpful, then Bevis is not sweet and Lionel is not entire.
As long as someone is yellow, he is sweet and helpful.
Sidney being helpful implies that Marlon is sweet.
If there is someone who is both messy and yellow, then Benton is not helpful.
If someone is not helpful or he is not healthy, then he is messy.
If there is someone who is either messy or sweet, then Benton is helpful. | Lionel is sweet. | self_contradiction |
Marlon is not entire.
Benton is not helpful.
Lionel is not yellow.
Bryant is not healthy.
Lionel is not messy.
Bryant is entire.
Lionel is not helpful.
Marlon is messy.
Bevis is not entire.
Lionel is not healthy.
Lionel is not sweet.
Bevis is not helpful.If Sidney is not sweet and Bevis is messy, then Lionel is not healthy and Bevis is entire.
It can be concluded that Sidney is not healthy once knowing that Marlon is helpful and Marlon is not yellow.
If there is someone who is either messy or helpful, then Sidney is not entire and Bryant is yellow.
If Lionel is helpful, then Sidney is entire, and vice versa.
If someone is not sweet, then he is both yellow and not helpful.
Lionel is not messy if and only if Benton is not helpful and Benton is healthy.
If all people are helpful, then Bevis is not sweet and Lionel is not entire.
As long as someone is yellow, he is sweet and helpful.
Sidney being helpful implies that Marlon is sweet.
If there is someone who is both messy and yellow, then Benton is not helpful.
If someone is not helpful or he is not healthy, then he is messy.
If there is someone who is either messy or sweet, then Benton is helpful. | Bryant is not helpful. | contradiction |
Marlon is not entire.
Benton is not helpful.
Lionel is not yellow.
Bryant is not healthy.
Lionel is not messy.
Bryant is entire.
Lionel is not helpful.
Marlon is messy.
Bevis is not entire.
Lionel is not healthy.
Lionel is not sweet.
Bevis is not helpful.If Sidney is not sweet and Bevis is messy, then Lionel is not healthy and Bevis is entire.
It can be concluded that Sidney is not healthy once knowing that Marlon is helpful and Marlon is not yellow.
If there is someone who is either messy or helpful, then Sidney is not entire and Bryant is yellow.
If Lionel is helpful, then Sidney is entire, and vice versa.
If someone is not sweet, then he is both yellow and not helpful.
Lionel is not messy if and only if Benton is not helpful and Benton is healthy.
If all people are helpful, then Bevis is not sweet and Lionel is not entire.
As long as someone is yellow, he is sweet and helpful.
Sidney being helpful implies that Marlon is sweet.
If there is someone who is both messy and yellow, then Benton is not helpful.
If someone is not helpful or he is not healthy, then he is messy.
If there is someone who is either messy or sweet, then Benton is helpful. | Bryant is messy. | entailment |
Marlon is not entire.
Benton is not helpful.
Lionel is not yellow.
Bryant is not healthy.
Lionel is not messy.
Bryant is entire.
Lionel is not helpful.
Marlon is messy.
Bevis is not entire.
Lionel is not healthy.
Lionel is not sweet.
Bevis is not helpful.If Sidney is not sweet and Bevis is messy, then Lionel is not healthy and Bevis is entire.
It can be concluded that Sidney is not healthy once knowing that Marlon is helpful and Marlon is not yellow.
If there is someone who is either messy or helpful, then Sidney is not entire and Bryant is yellow.
If Lionel is helpful, then Sidney is entire, and vice versa.
If someone is not sweet, then he is both yellow and not helpful.
Lionel is not messy if and only if Benton is not helpful and Benton is healthy.
If all people are helpful, then Bevis is not sweet and Lionel is not entire.
As long as someone is yellow, he is sweet and helpful.
Sidney being helpful implies that Marlon is sweet.
If there is someone who is both messy and yellow, then Benton is not helpful.
If someone is not helpful or he is not healthy, then he is messy.
If there is someone who is either messy or sweet, then Benton is helpful. | Marlon is not sweet. | neutral |
Marlon is not entire.
Benton is not helpful.
Lionel is not yellow.
Bryant is not healthy.
Lionel is not messy.
Bryant is entire.
Lionel is not helpful.
Marlon is messy.
Bevis is not entire.
Lionel is not healthy.
Lionel is not sweet.
Bevis is not helpful.If Sidney is not sweet and Bevis is messy, then Lionel is not healthy and Bevis is entire.
It can be concluded that Sidney is not healthy once knowing that Marlon is helpful and Marlon is not yellow.
If there is someone who is either messy or helpful, then Sidney is not entire and Bryant is yellow.
If Lionel is helpful, then Sidney is entire, and vice versa.
If someone is not sweet, then he is both yellow and not helpful.
Lionel is not messy if and only if Benton is not helpful and Benton is healthy.
If all people are helpful, then Bevis is not sweet and Lionel is not entire.
As long as someone is yellow, he is sweet and helpful.
Sidney being helpful implies that Marlon is sweet.
If there is someone who is both messy and yellow, then Benton is not helpful.
If someone is not helpful or he is not healthy, then he is messy.
If there is someone who is either messy or sweet, then Benton is helpful. | Lionel is yellow. | self_contradiction |
Marlon is not entire.
Benton is not helpful.
Lionel is not yellow.
Bryant is not healthy.
Lionel is not messy.
Bryant is entire.
Lionel is not helpful.
Marlon is messy.
Bevis is not entire.
Lionel is not healthy.
Lionel is not sweet.
Bevis is not helpful.If Sidney is not sweet and Bevis is messy, then Lionel is not healthy and Bevis is entire.
It can be concluded that Sidney is not healthy once knowing that Marlon is helpful and Marlon is not yellow.
If there is someone who is either messy or helpful, then Sidney is not entire and Bryant is yellow.
If Lionel is helpful, then Sidney is entire, and vice versa.
If someone is not sweet, then he is both yellow and not helpful.
Lionel is not messy if and only if Benton is not helpful and Benton is healthy.
If all people are helpful, then Bevis is not sweet and Lionel is not entire.
As long as someone is yellow, he is sweet and helpful.
Sidney being helpful implies that Marlon is sweet.
If there is someone who is both messy and yellow, then Benton is not helpful.
If someone is not helpful or he is not healthy, then he is messy.
If there is someone who is either messy or sweet, then Benton is helpful. | Marlon is not helpful. | neutral |
Marlon is not entire.
Benton is not helpful.
Lionel is not yellow.
Bryant is not healthy.
Lionel is not messy.
Bryant is entire.
Lionel is not helpful.
Marlon is messy.
Bevis is not entire.
Lionel is not healthy.
Lionel is not sweet.
Bevis is not helpful.If Sidney is not sweet and Bevis is messy, then Lionel is not healthy and Bevis is entire.
It can be concluded that Sidney is not healthy once knowing that Marlon is helpful and Marlon is not yellow.
If there is someone who is either messy or helpful, then Sidney is not entire and Bryant is yellow.
If Lionel is helpful, then Sidney is entire, and vice versa.
If someone is not sweet, then he is both yellow and not helpful.
Lionel is not messy if and only if Benton is not helpful and Benton is healthy.
If all people are helpful, then Bevis is not sweet and Lionel is not entire.
As long as someone is yellow, he is sweet and helpful.
Sidney being helpful implies that Marlon is sweet.
If there is someone who is both messy and yellow, then Benton is not helpful.
If someone is not helpful or he is not healthy, then he is messy.
If there is someone who is either messy or sweet, then Benton is helpful. | Bryant is sweet. | entailment |
Marlon is not entire.
Benton is not helpful.
Lionel is not yellow.
Bryant is not healthy.
Lionel is not messy.
Bryant is entire.
Lionel is not helpful.
Marlon is messy.
Bevis is not entire.
Lionel is not healthy.
Lionel is not sweet.
Bevis is not helpful.If Sidney is not sweet and Bevis is messy, then Lionel is not healthy and Bevis is entire.
It can be concluded that Sidney is not healthy once knowing that Marlon is helpful and Marlon is not yellow.
If there is someone who is either messy or helpful, then Sidney is not entire and Bryant is yellow.
If Lionel is helpful, then Sidney is entire, and vice versa.
If someone is not sweet, then he is both yellow and not helpful.
Lionel is not messy if and only if Benton is not helpful and Benton is healthy.
If all people are helpful, then Bevis is not sweet and Lionel is not entire.
As long as someone is yellow, he is sweet and helpful.
Sidney being helpful implies that Marlon is sweet.
If there is someone who is both messy and yellow, then Benton is not helpful.
If someone is not helpful or he is not healthy, then he is messy.
If there is someone who is either messy or sweet, then Benton is helpful. | Lionel is helpful. | self_contradiction |
Marlon is not entire.
Benton is not helpful.
Lionel is not yellow.
Bryant is not healthy.
Lionel is not messy.
Bryant is entire.
Lionel is not helpful.
Marlon is messy.
Bevis is not entire.
Lionel is not healthy.
Lionel is not sweet.
Bevis is not helpful.If Sidney is not sweet and Bevis is messy, then Lionel is not healthy and Bevis is entire.
It can be concluded that Sidney is not healthy once knowing that Marlon is helpful and Marlon is not yellow.
If there is someone who is either messy or helpful, then Sidney is not entire and Bryant is yellow.
If Lionel is helpful, then Sidney is entire, and vice versa.
If someone is not sweet, then he is both yellow and not helpful.
Lionel is not messy if and only if Benton is not helpful and Benton is healthy.
If all people are helpful, then Bevis is not sweet and Lionel is not entire.
As long as someone is yellow, he is sweet and helpful.
Sidney being helpful implies that Marlon is sweet.
If there is someone who is both messy and yellow, then Benton is not helpful.
If someone is not helpful or he is not healthy, then he is messy.
If there is someone who is either messy or sweet, then Benton is helpful. | Lionel is not yellow. | self_contradiction |
Marlon is not entire.
Benton is not helpful.
Lionel is not yellow.
Bryant is not healthy.
Lionel is not messy.
Bryant is entire.
Lionel is not helpful.
Marlon is messy.
Bevis is not entire.
Lionel is not healthy.
Lionel is not sweet.
Bevis is not helpful.If Sidney is not sweet and Bevis is messy, then Lionel is not healthy and Bevis is entire.
It can be concluded that Sidney is not healthy once knowing that Marlon is helpful and Marlon is not yellow.
If there is someone who is either messy or helpful, then Sidney is not entire and Bryant is yellow.
If Lionel is helpful, then Sidney is entire, and vice versa.
If someone is not sweet, then he is both yellow and not helpful.
Lionel is not messy if and only if Benton is not helpful and Benton is healthy.
If all people are helpful, then Bevis is not sweet and Lionel is not entire.
As long as someone is yellow, he is sweet and helpful.
Sidney being helpful implies that Marlon is sweet.
If there is someone who is both messy and yellow, then Benton is not helpful.
If someone is not helpful or he is not healthy, then he is messy.
If there is someone who is either messy or sweet, then Benton is helpful. | Bud is sweet. | neutral |
Marlon is not entire.
Benton is not helpful.
Lionel is not yellow.
Bryant is not healthy.
Lionel is not messy.
Bryant is entire.
Lionel is not helpful.
Marlon is messy.
Bevis is not entire.
Lionel is not healthy.
Lionel is not sweet.
Bevis is not helpful.If Sidney is not sweet and Bevis is messy, then Lionel is not healthy and Bevis is entire.
It can be concluded that Sidney is not healthy once knowing that Marlon is helpful and Marlon is not yellow.
If there is someone who is either messy or helpful, then Sidney is not entire and Bryant is yellow.
If Lionel is helpful, then Sidney is entire, and vice versa.
If someone is not sweet, then he is both yellow and not helpful.
Lionel is not messy if and only if Benton is not helpful and Benton is healthy.
If all people are helpful, then Bevis is not sweet and Lionel is not entire.
As long as someone is yellow, he is sweet and helpful.
Sidney being helpful implies that Marlon is sweet.
If there is someone who is both messy and yellow, then Benton is not helpful.
If someone is not helpful or he is not healthy, then he is messy.
If there is someone who is either messy or sweet, then Benton is helpful. | Bevis is not messy. | contradiction |
Cecil is willing.
Cecil is sharp.
Kelvin is not courageous.
Kelvin is smoggy.
Aldis is not happy.
Sheridan is not smoggy.
Keene is not smoggy.
Sheridan is not sharp.
Kelvin is happy.
Ethan is not courageous.
Aldis is sharp.
Sheridan is not old-fashioned.If there is at least one people who is courageous or not sharp, then Cecil is willing.
Someone who is not smoggy is always both not happy and not sharp.
If someone is old-fashioned or smoggy, then he is happy.
If there is at least one people who is not old-fashioned or willing, then Casper is courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both sharp and not old-fashioned, then Casper is not courageous.
If all people are not courageous or not smoggy, then Casper is sharp.
If Ethan is sharp, then Casper is happy, and vice versa.
Someone being old-fashioned is equivalent to being not courageous.
Someone being willing is equivalent to being not happy.
If someone is not old-fashioned and not happy, then he is not courageous, and vice versa.
If someone is old-fashioned, then he is both not happy and not willing.
Someone being both not sharp and not old-fashioned is equivalent to being not courageous and not willing. | Kelvin is happy. | self_contradiction |
Cecil is willing.
Cecil is sharp.
Kelvin is not courageous.
Kelvin is smoggy.
Aldis is not happy.
Sheridan is not smoggy.
Keene is not smoggy.
Sheridan is not sharp.
Kelvin is happy.
Ethan is not courageous.
Aldis is sharp.
Sheridan is not old-fashioned.If there is at least one people who is courageous or not sharp, then Cecil is willing.
Someone who is not smoggy is always both not happy and not sharp.
If someone is old-fashioned or smoggy, then he is happy.
If there is at least one people who is not old-fashioned or willing, then Casper is courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both sharp and not old-fashioned, then Casper is not courageous.
If all people are not courageous or not smoggy, then Casper is sharp.
If Ethan is sharp, then Casper is happy, and vice versa.
Someone being old-fashioned is equivalent to being not courageous.
Someone being willing is equivalent to being not happy.
If someone is not old-fashioned and not happy, then he is not courageous, and vice versa.
If someone is old-fashioned, then he is both not happy and not willing.
Someone being both not sharp and not old-fashioned is equivalent to being not courageous and not willing. | Casper is old-fashioned. | neutral |
Cecil is willing.
Cecil is sharp.
Kelvin is not courageous.
Kelvin is smoggy.
Aldis is not happy.
Sheridan is not smoggy.
Keene is not smoggy.
Sheridan is not sharp.
Kelvin is happy.
Ethan is not courageous.
Aldis is sharp.
Sheridan is not old-fashioned.If there is at least one people who is courageous or not sharp, then Cecil is willing.
Someone who is not smoggy is always both not happy and not sharp.
If someone is old-fashioned or smoggy, then he is happy.
If there is at least one people who is not old-fashioned or willing, then Casper is courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both sharp and not old-fashioned, then Casper is not courageous.
If all people are not courageous or not smoggy, then Casper is sharp.
If Ethan is sharp, then Casper is happy, and vice versa.
Someone being old-fashioned is equivalent to being not courageous.
Someone being willing is equivalent to being not happy.
If someone is not old-fashioned and not happy, then he is not courageous, and vice versa.
If someone is old-fashioned, then he is both not happy and not willing.
Someone being both not sharp and not old-fashioned is equivalent to being not courageous and not willing. | Aldis is not courageous. | neutral |
Cecil is willing.
Cecil is sharp.
Kelvin is not courageous.
Kelvin is smoggy.
Aldis is not happy.
Sheridan is not smoggy.
Keene is not smoggy.
Sheridan is not sharp.
Kelvin is happy.
Ethan is not courageous.
Aldis is sharp.
Sheridan is not old-fashioned.If there is at least one people who is courageous or not sharp, then Cecil is willing.
Someone who is not smoggy is always both not happy and not sharp.
If someone is old-fashioned or smoggy, then he is happy.
If there is at least one people who is not old-fashioned or willing, then Casper is courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both sharp and not old-fashioned, then Casper is not courageous.
If all people are not courageous or not smoggy, then Casper is sharp.
If Ethan is sharp, then Casper is happy, and vice versa.
Someone being old-fashioned is equivalent to being not courageous.
Someone being willing is equivalent to being not happy.
If someone is not old-fashioned and not happy, then he is not courageous, and vice versa.
If someone is old-fashioned, then he is both not happy and not willing.
Someone being both not sharp and not old-fashioned is equivalent to being not courageous and not willing. | Cecil is not willing. | contradiction |
Cecil is willing.
Cecil is sharp.
Kelvin is not courageous.
Kelvin is smoggy.
Aldis is not happy.
Sheridan is not smoggy.
Keene is not smoggy.
Sheridan is not sharp.
Kelvin is happy.
Ethan is not courageous.
Aldis is sharp.
Sheridan is not old-fashioned.If there is at least one people who is courageous or not sharp, then Cecil is willing.
Someone who is not smoggy is always both not happy and not sharp.
If someone is old-fashioned or smoggy, then he is happy.
If there is at least one people who is not old-fashioned or willing, then Casper is courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both sharp and not old-fashioned, then Casper is not courageous.
If all people are not courageous or not smoggy, then Casper is sharp.
If Ethan is sharp, then Casper is happy, and vice versa.
Someone being old-fashioned is equivalent to being not courageous.
Someone being willing is equivalent to being not happy.
If someone is not old-fashioned and not happy, then he is not courageous, and vice versa.
If someone is old-fashioned, then he is both not happy and not willing.
Someone being both not sharp and not old-fashioned is equivalent to being not courageous and not willing. | Ethan is not happy. | self_contradiction |
Cecil is willing.
Cecil is sharp.
Kelvin is not courageous.
Kelvin is smoggy.
Aldis is not happy.
Sheridan is not smoggy.
Keene is not smoggy.
Sheridan is not sharp.
Kelvin is happy.
Ethan is not courageous.
Aldis is sharp.
Sheridan is not old-fashioned.If there is at least one people who is courageous or not sharp, then Cecil is willing.
Someone who is not smoggy is always both not happy and not sharp.
If someone is old-fashioned or smoggy, then he is happy.
If there is at least one people who is not old-fashioned or willing, then Casper is courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both sharp and not old-fashioned, then Casper is not courageous.
If all people are not courageous or not smoggy, then Casper is sharp.
If Ethan is sharp, then Casper is happy, and vice versa.
Someone being old-fashioned is equivalent to being not courageous.
Someone being willing is equivalent to being not happy.
If someone is not old-fashioned and not happy, then he is not courageous, and vice versa.
If someone is old-fashioned, then he is both not happy and not willing.
Someone being both not sharp and not old-fashioned is equivalent to being not courageous and not willing. | Sheridan is courageous. | contradiction |
Cecil is willing.
Cecil is sharp.
Kelvin is not courageous.
Kelvin is smoggy.
Aldis is not happy.
Sheridan is not smoggy.
Keene is not smoggy.
Sheridan is not sharp.
Kelvin is happy.
Ethan is not courageous.
Aldis is sharp.
Sheridan is not old-fashioned.If there is at least one people who is courageous or not sharp, then Cecil is willing.
Someone who is not smoggy is always both not happy and not sharp.
If someone is old-fashioned or smoggy, then he is happy.
If there is at least one people who is not old-fashioned or willing, then Casper is courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both sharp and not old-fashioned, then Casper is not courageous.
If all people are not courageous or not smoggy, then Casper is sharp.
If Ethan is sharp, then Casper is happy, and vice versa.
Someone being old-fashioned is equivalent to being not courageous.
Someone being willing is equivalent to being not happy.
If someone is not old-fashioned and not happy, then he is not courageous, and vice versa.
If someone is old-fashioned, then he is both not happy and not willing.
Someone being both not sharp and not old-fashioned is equivalent to being not courageous and not willing. | Aldis is courageous. | neutral |
Cecil is willing.
Cecil is sharp.
Kelvin is not courageous.
Kelvin is smoggy.
Aldis is not happy.
Sheridan is not smoggy.
Keene is not smoggy.
Sheridan is not sharp.
Kelvin is happy.
Ethan is not courageous.
Aldis is sharp.
Sheridan is not old-fashioned.If there is at least one people who is courageous or not sharp, then Cecil is willing.
Someone who is not smoggy is always both not happy and not sharp.
If someone is old-fashioned or smoggy, then he is happy.
If there is at least one people who is not old-fashioned or willing, then Casper is courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both sharp and not old-fashioned, then Casper is not courageous.
If all people are not courageous or not smoggy, then Casper is sharp.
If Ethan is sharp, then Casper is happy, and vice versa.
Someone being old-fashioned is equivalent to being not courageous.
Someone being willing is equivalent to being not happy.
If someone is not old-fashioned and not happy, then he is not courageous, and vice versa.
If someone is old-fashioned, then he is both not happy and not willing.
Someone being both not sharp and not old-fashioned is equivalent to being not courageous and not willing. | Kelvin is courageous. | contradiction |
Cecil is willing.
Cecil is sharp.
Kelvin is not courageous.
Kelvin is smoggy.
Aldis is not happy.
Sheridan is not smoggy.
Keene is not smoggy.
Sheridan is not sharp.
Kelvin is happy.
Ethan is not courageous.
Aldis is sharp.
Sheridan is not old-fashioned.If there is at least one people who is courageous or not sharp, then Cecil is willing.
Someone who is not smoggy is always both not happy and not sharp.
If someone is old-fashioned or smoggy, then he is happy.
If there is at least one people who is not old-fashioned or willing, then Casper is courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both sharp and not old-fashioned, then Casper is not courageous.
If all people are not courageous or not smoggy, then Casper is sharp.
If Ethan is sharp, then Casper is happy, and vice versa.
Someone being old-fashioned is equivalent to being not courageous.
Someone being willing is equivalent to being not happy.
If someone is not old-fashioned and not happy, then he is not courageous, and vice versa.
If someone is old-fashioned, then he is both not happy and not willing.
Someone being both not sharp and not old-fashioned is equivalent to being not courageous and not willing. | Keene is happy. | contradiction |
Cecil is willing.
Cecil is sharp.
Kelvin is not courageous.
Kelvin is smoggy.
Aldis is not happy.
Sheridan is not smoggy.
Keene is not smoggy.
Sheridan is not sharp.
Kelvin is happy.
Ethan is not courageous.
Aldis is sharp.
Sheridan is not old-fashioned.If there is at least one people who is courageous or not sharp, then Cecil is willing.
Someone who is not smoggy is always both not happy and not sharp.
If someone is old-fashioned or smoggy, then he is happy.
If there is at least one people who is not old-fashioned or willing, then Casper is courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both sharp and not old-fashioned, then Casper is not courageous.
If all people are not courageous or not smoggy, then Casper is sharp.
If Ethan is sharp, then Casper is happy, and vice versa.
Someone being old-fashioned is equivalent to being not courageous.
Someone being willing is equivalent to being not happy.
If someone is not old-fashioned and not happy, then he is not courageous, and vice versa.
If someone is old-fashioned, then he is both not happy and not willing.
Someone being both not sharp and not old-fashioned is equivalent to being not courageous and not willing. | Cecil is willing. | entailment |
Cecil is willing.
Cecil is sharp.
Kelvin is not courageous.
Kelvin is smoggy.
Aldis is not happy.
Sheridan is not smoggy.
Keene is not smoggy.
Sheridan is not sharp.
Kelvin is happy.
Ethan is not courageous.
Aldis is sharp.
Sheridan is not old-fashioned.If there is at least one people who is courageous or not sharp, then Cecil is willing.
Someone who is not smoggy is always both not happy and not sharp.
If someone is old-fashioned or smoggy, then he is happy.
If there is at least one people who is not old-fashioned or willing, then Casper is courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both sharp and not old-fashioned, then Casper is not courageous.
If all people are not courageous or not smoggy, then Casper is sharp.
If Ethan is sharp, then Casper is happy, and vice versa.
Someone being old-fashioned is equivalent to being not courageous.
Someone being willing is equivalent to being not happy.
If someone is not old-fashioned and not happy, then he is not courageous, and vice versa.
If someone is old-fashioned, then he is both not happy and not willing.
Someone being both not sharp and not old-fashioned is equivalent to being not courageous and not willing. | Aldis is not happy. | entailment |
Cecil is willing.
Cecil is sharp.
Kelvin is not courageous.
Kelvin is smoggy.
Aldis is not happy.
Sheridan is not smoggy.
Keene is not smoggy.
Sheridan is not sharp.
Kelvin is happy.
Ethan is not courageous.
Aldis is sharp.
Sheridan is not old-fashioned.If there is at least one people who is courageous or not sharp, then Cecil is willing.
Someone who is not smoggy is always both not happy and not sharp.
If someone is old-fashioned or smoggy, then he is happy.
If there is at least one people who is not old-fashioned or willing, then Casper is courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both sharp and not old-fashioned, then Casper is not courageous.
If all people are not courageous or not smoggy, then Casper is sharp.
If Ethan is sharp, then Casper is happy, and vice versa.
Someone being old-fashioned is equivalent to being not courageous.
Someone being willing is equivalent to being not happy.
If someone is not old-fashioned and not happy, then he is not courageous, and vice versa.
If someone is old-fashioned, then he is both not happy and not willing.
Someone being both not sharp and not old-fashioned is equivalent to being not courageous and not willing. | Sheridan is happy. | self_contradiction |
Cecil is willing.
Cecil is sharp.
Kelvin is not courageous.
Kelvin is smoggy.
Aldis is not happy.
Sheridan is not smoggy.
Keene is not smoggy.
Sheridan is not sharp.
Kelvin is happy.
Ethan is not courageous.
Aldis is sharp.
Sheridan is not old-fashioned.If there is at least one people who is courageous or not sharp, then Cecil is willing.
Someone who is not smoggy is always both not happy and not sharp.
If someone is old-fashioned or smoggy, then he is happy.
If there is at least one people who is not old-fashioned or willing, then Casper is courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both sharp and not old-fashioned, then Casper is not courageous.
If all people are not courageous or not smoggy, then Casper is sharp.
If Ethan is sharp, then Casper is happy, and vice versa.
Someone being old-fashioned is equivalent to being not courageous.
Someone being willing is equivalent to being not happy.
If someone is not old-fashioned and not happy, then he is not courageous, and vice versa.
If someone is old-fashioned, then he is both not happy and not willing.
Someone being both not sharp and not old-fashioned is equivalent to being not courageous and not willing. | Cecil is not courageous. | neutral |
Cecil is willing.
Cecil is sharp.
Kelvin is not courageous.
Kelvin is smoggy.
Aldis is not happy.
Sheridan is not smoggy.
Keene is not smoggy.
Sheridan is not sharp.
Kelvin is happy.
Ethan is not courageous.
Aldis is sharp.
Sheridan is not old-fashioned.If there is at least one people who is courageous or not sharp, then Cecil is willing.
Someone who is not smoggy is always both not happy and not sharp.
If someone is old-fashioned or smoggy, then he is happy.
If there is at least one people who is not old-fashioned or willing, then Casper is courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both sharp and not old-fashioned, then Casper is not courageous.
If all people are not courageous or not smoggy, then Casper is sharp.
If Ethan is sharp, then Casper is happy, and vice versa.
Someone being old-fashioned is equivalent to being not courageous.
Someone being willing is equivalent to being not happy.
If someone is not old-fashioned and not happy, then he is not courageous, and vice versa.
If someone is old-fashioned, then he is both not happy and not willing.
Someone being both not sharp and not old-fashioned is equivalent to being not courageous and not willing. | Kelvin is old-fashioned. | self_contradiction |
Cecil is willing.
Cecil is sharp.
Kelvin is not courageous.
Kelvin is smoggy.
Aldis is not happy.
Sheridan is not smoggy.
Keene is not smoggy.
Sheridan is not sharp.
Kelvin is happy.
Ethan is not courageous.
Aldis is sharp.
Sheridan is not old-fashioned.If there is at least one people who is courageous or not sharp, then Cecil is willing.
Someone who is not smoggy is always both not happy and not sharp.
If someone is old-fashioned or smoggy, then he is happy.
If there is at least one people who is not old-fashioned or willing, then Casper is courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both sharp and not old-fashioned, then Casper is not courageous.
If all people are not courageous or not smoggy, then Casper is sharp.
If Ethan is sharp, then Casper is happy, and vice versa.
Someone being old-fashioned is equivalent to being not courageous.
Someone being willing is equivalent to being not happy.
If someone is not old-fashioned and not happy, then he is not courageous, and vice versa.
If someone is old-fashioned, then he is both not happy and not willing.
Someone being both not sharp and not old-fashioned is equivalent to being not courageous and not willing. | Kelvin is not courageous. | entailment |
Cecil is willing.
Cecil is sharp.
Kelvin is not courageous.
Kelvin is smoggy.
Aldis is not happy.
Sheridan is not smoggy.
Keene is not smoggy.
Sheridan is not sharp.
Kelvin is happy.
Ethan is not courageous.
Aldis is sharp.
Sheridan is not old-fashioned.If there is at least one people who is courageous or not sharp, then Cecil is willing.
Someone who is not smoggy is always both not happy and not sharp.
If someone is old-fashioned or smoggy, then he is happy.
If there is at least one people who is not old-fashioned or willing, then Casper is courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both sharp and not old-fashioned, then Casper is not courageous.
If all people are not courageous or not smoggy, then Casper is sharp.
If Ethan is sharp, then Casper is happy, and vice versa.
Someone being old-fashioned is equivalent to being not courageous.
Someone being willing is equivalent to being not happy.
If someone is not old-fashioned and not happy, then he is not courageous, and vice versa.
If someone is old-fashioned, then he is both not happy and not willing.
Someone being both not sharp and not old-fashioned is equivalent to being not courageous and not willing. | Ethan is not courageous. | entailment |
Cecil is willing.
Cecil is sharp.
Kelvin is not courageous.
Kelvin is smoggy.
Aldis is not happy.
Sheridan is not smoggy.
Keene is not smoggy.
Sheridan is not sharp.
Kelvin is happy.
Ethan is not courageous.
Aldis is sharp.
Sheridan is not old-fashioned.If there is at least one people who is courageous or not sharp, then Cecil is willing.
Someone who is not smoggy is always both not happy and not sharp.
If someone is old-fashioned or smoggy, then he is happy.
If there is at least one people who is not old-fashioned or willing, then Casper is courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both sharp and not old-fashioned, then Casper is not courageous.
If all people are not courageous or not smoggy, then Casper is sharp.
If Ethan is sharp, then Casper is happy, and vice versa.
Someone being old-fashioned is equivalent to being not courageous.
Someone being willing is equivalent to being not happy.
If someone is not old-fashioned and not happy, then he is not courageous, and vice versa.
If someone is old-fashioned, then he is both not happy and not willing.
Someone being both not sharp and not old-fashioned is equivalent to being not courageous and not willing. | Sheridan is not willing. | self_contradiction |
Cecil is willing.
Cecil is sharp.
Kelvin is not courageous.
Kelvin is smoggy.
Aldis is not happy.
Sheridan is not smoggy.
Keene is not smoggy.
Sheridan is not sharp.
Kelvin is happy.
Ethan is not courageous.
Aldis is sharp.
Sheridan is not old-fashioned.If there is at least one people who is courageous or not sharp, then Cecil is willing.
Someone who is not smoggy is always both not happy and not sharp.
If someone is old-fashioned or smoggy, then he is happy.
If there is at least one people who is not old-fashioned or willing, then Casper is courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both sharp and not old-fashioned, then Casper is not courageous.
If all people are not courageous or not smoggy, then Casper is sharp.
If Ethan is sharp, then Casper is happy, and vice versa.
Someone being old-fashioned is equivalent to being not courageous.
Someone being willing is equivalent to being not happy.
If someone is not old-fashioned and not happy, then he is not courageous, and vice versa.
If someone is old-fashioned, then he is both not happy and not willing.
Someone being both not sharp and not old-fashioned is equivalent to being not courageous and not willing. | Keene is not willing. | contradiction |
Cecil is willing.
Cecil is sharp.
Kelvin is not courageous.
Kelvin is smoggy.
Aldis is not happy.
Sheridan is not smoggy.
Keene is not smoggy.
Sheridan is not sharp.
Kelvin is happy.
Ethan is not courageous.
Aldis is sharp.
Sheridan is not old-fashioned.If there is at least one people who is courageous or not sharp, then Cecil is willing.
Someone who is not smoggy is always both not happy and not sharp.
If someone is old-fashioned or smoggy, then he is happy.
If there is at least one people who is not old-fashioned or willing, then Casper is courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both sharp and not old-fashioned, then Casper is not courageous.
If all people are not courageous or not smoggy, then Casper is sharp.
If Ethan is sharp, then Casper is happy, and vice versa.
Someone being old-fashioned is equivalent to being not courageous.
Someone being willing is equivalent to being not happy.
If someone is not old-fashioned and not happy, then he is not courageous, and vice versa.
If someone is old-fashioned, then he is both not happy and not willing.
Someone being both not sharp and not old-fashioned is equivalent to being not courageous and not willing. | Cecil is sharp. | entailment |
Cecil is willing.
Cecil is sharp.
Kelvin is not courageous.
Kelvin is smoggy.
Aldis is not happy.
Sheridan is not smoggy.
Keene is not smoggy.
Sheridan is not sharp.
Kelvin is happy.
Ethan is not courageous.
Aldis is sharp.
Sheridan is not old-fashioned.If there is at least one people who is courageous or not sharp, then Cecil is willing.
Someone who is not smoggy is always both not happy and not sharp.
If someone is old-fashioned or smoggy, then he is happy.
If there is at least one people who is not old-fashioned or willing, then Casper is courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both sharp and not old-fashioned, then Casper is not courageous.
If all people are not courageous or not smoggy, then Casper is sharp.
If Ethan is sharp, then Casper is happy, and vice versa.
Someone being old-fashioned is equivalent to being not courageous.
Someone being willing is equivalent to being not happy.
If someone is not old-fashioned and not happy, then he is not courageous, and vice versa.
If someone is old-fashioned, then he is both not happy and not willing.
Someone being both not sharp and not old-fashioned is equivalent to being not courageous and not willing. | Casper is not old-fashioned. | neutral |
Peter is not terrible.
Sloane is not perfect.
Peter is wooden.
Mark is practical.
Alice is terrible.
Mark is wooden.
Alice is not wooden.
Mark is eastern.
Quinn is not wooden.
Peter is not practical.
Bruno is terrible.
Bruno is perfect.Bruno being terrible implies that Peter is not eastern and Bruno is not wooden.
If someone is terrible or perfect, then he is wooden.
If there is at least one people who is both not wooden and perfect, then Alice is terrible.
As long as someone is not wooden, he is not terrible and eastern.
If Mark is not eastern, then Quinn is not wooden.
If Mark is practical, then Brian is perfect and Quinn is not wooden, and vice versa.
If someone is not terrible and not practical, then he is perfect, and vice versa.
Quinn being wooden is equivalent to Brian being perfect and Mark being not practical.
If there is someone who is not eastern, then Sloane is helpful.
Someone being both not perfect and helpful is equivalent to being terrible and not eastern.
Peter being not eastern or Brian being wooden implies that Peter is perfect.
Someone who is not practical is always both not perfect and not eastern. | Bruno is not helpful. | contradiction |
Peter is not terrible.
Sloane is not perfect.
Peter is wooden.
Mark is practical.
Alice is terrible.
Mark is wooden.
Alice is not wooden.
Mark is eastern.
Quinn is not wooden.
Peter is not practical.
Bruno is terrible.
Bruno is perfect.Bruno being terrible implies that Peter is not eastern and Bruno is not wooden.
If someone is terrible or perfect, then he is wooden.
If there is at least one people who is both not wooden and perfect, then Alice is terrible.
As long as someone is not wooden, he is not terrible and eastern.
If Mark is not eastern, then Quinn is not wooden.
If Mark is practical, then Brian is perfect and Quinn is not wooden, and vice versa.
If someone is not terrible and not practical, then he is perfect, and vice versa.
Quinn being wooden is equivalent to Brian being perfect and Mark being not practical.
If there is someone who is not eastern, then Sloane is helpful.
Someone being both not perfect and helpful is equivalent to being terrible and not eastern.
Peter being not eastern or Brian being wooden implies that Peter is perfect.
Someone who is not practical is always both not perfect and not eastern. | Alice is not practical. | neutral |
Peter is not terrible.
Sloane is not perfect.
Peter is wooden.
Mark is practical.
Alice is terrible.
Mark is wooden.
Alice is not wooden.
Mark is eastern.
Quinn is not wooden.
Peter is not practical.
Bruno is terrible.
Bruno is perfect.Bruno being terrible implies that Peter is not eastern and Bruno is not wooden.
If someone is terrible or perfect, then he is wooden.
If there is at least one people who is both not wooden and perfect, then Alice is terrible.
As long as someone is not wooden, he is not terrible and eastern.
If Mark is not eastern, then Quinn is not wooden.
If Mark is practical, then Brian is perfect and Quinn is not wooden, and vice versa.
If someone is not terrible and not practical, then he is perfect, and vice versa.
Quinn being wooden is equivalent to Brian being perfect and Mark being not practical.
If there is someone who is not eastern, then Sloane is helpful.
Someone being both not perfect and helpful is equivalent to being terrible and not eastern.
Peter being not eastern or Brian being wooden implies that Peter is perfect.
Someone who is not practical is always both not perfect and not eastern. | Bruno is not practical. | entailment |
Peter is not terrible.
Sloane is not perfect.
Peter is wooden.
Mark is practical.
Alice is terrible.
Mark is wooden.
Alice is not wooden.
Mark is eastern.
Quinn is not wooden.
Peter is not practical.
Bruno is terrible.
Bruno is perfect.Bruno being terrible implies that Peter is not eastern and Bruno is not wooden.
If someone is terrible or perfect, then he is wooden.
If there is at least one people who is both not wooden and perfect, then Alice is terrible.
As long as someone is not wooden, he is not terrible and eastern.
If Mark is not eastern, then Quinn is not wooden.
If Mark is practical, then Brian is perfect and Quinn is not wooden, and vice versa.
If someone is not terrible and not practical, then he is perfect, and vice versa.
Quinn being wooden is equivalent to Brian being perfect and Mark being not practical.
If there is someone who is not eastern, then Sloane is helpful.
Someone being both not perfect and helpful is equivalent to being terrible and not eastern.
Peter being not eastern or Brian being wooden implies that Peter is perfect.
Someone who is not practical is always both not perfect and not eastern. | Bruno is wooden. | self_contradiction |
Peter is not terrible.
Sloane is not perfect.
Peter is wooden.
Mark is practical.
Alice is terrible.
Mark is wooden.
Alice is not wooden.
Mark is eastern.
Quinn is not wooden.
Peter is not practical.
Bruno is terrible.
Bruno is perfect.Bruno being terrible implies that Peter is not eastern and Bruno is not wooden.
If someone is terrible or perfect, then he is wooden.
If there is at least one people who is both not wooden and perfect, then Alice is terrible.
As long as someone is not wooden, he is not terrible and eastern.
If Mark is not eastern, then Quinn is not wooden.
If Mark is practical, then Brian is perfect and Quinn is not wooden, and vice versa.
If someone is not terrible and not practical, then he is perfect, and vice versa.
Quinn being wooden is equivalent to Brian being perfect and Mark being not practical.
If there is someone who is not eastern, then Sloane is helpful.
Someone being both not perfect and helpful is equivalent to being terrible and not eastern.
Peter being not eastern or Brian being wooden implies that Peter is perfect.
Someone who is not practical is always both not perfect and not eastern. | Bruno is terrible. | self_contradiction |
Peter is not terrible.
Sloane is not perfect.
Peter is wooden.
Mark is practical.
Alice is terrible.
Mark is wooden.
Alice is not wooden.
Mark is eastern.
Quinn is not wooden.
Peter is not practical.
Bruno is terrible.
Bruno is perfect.Bruno being terrible implies that Peter is not eastern and Bruno is not wooden.
If someone is terrible or perfect, then he is wooden.
If there is at least one people who is both not wooden and perfect, then Alice is terrible.
As long as someone is not wooden, he is not terrible and eastern.
If Mark is not eastern, then Quinn is not wooden.
If Mark is practical, then Brian is perfect and Quinn is not wooden, and vice versa.
If someone is not terrible and not practical, then he is perfect, and vice versa.
Quinn being wooden is equivalent to Brian being perfect and Mark being not practical.
If there is someone who is not eastern, then Sloane is helpful.
Someone being both not perfect and helpful is equivalent to being terrible and not eastern.
Peter being not eastern or Brian being wooden implies that Peter is perfect.
Someone who is not practical is always both not perfect and not eastern. | Mark is not helpful. | neutral |
Peter is not terrible.
Sloane is not perfect.
Peter is wooden.
Mark is practical.
Alice is terrible.
Mark is wooden.
Alice is not wooden.
Mark is eastern.
Quinn is not wooden.
Peter is not practical.
Bruno is terrible.
Bruno is perfect.Bruno being terrible implies that Peter is not eastern and Bruno is not wooden.
If someone is terrible or perfect, then he is wooden.
If there is at least one people who is both not wooden and perfect, then Alice is terrible.
As long as someone is not wooden, he is not terrible and eastern.
If Mark is not eastern, then Quinn is not wooden.
If Mark is practical, then Brian is perfect and Quinn is not wooden, and vice versa.
If someone is not terrible and not practical, then he is perfect, and vice versa.
Quinn being wooden is equivalent to Brian being perfect and Mark being not practical.
If there is someone who is not eastern, then Sloane is helpful.
Someone being both not perfect and helpful is equivalent to being terrible and not eastern.
Peter being not eastern or Brian being wooden implies that Peter is perfect.
Someone who is not practical is always both not perfect and not eastern. | Sloane is not eastern. | entailment |
Peter is not terrible.
Sloane is not perfect.
Peter is wooden.
Mark is practical.
Alice is terrible.
Mark is wooden.
Alice is not wooden.
Mark is eastern.
Quinn is not wooden.
Peter is not practical.
Bruno is terrible.
Bruno is perfect.Bruno being terrible implies that Peter is not eastern and Bruno is not wooden.
If someone is terrible or perfect, then he is wooden.
If there is at least one people who is both not wooden and perfect, then Alice is terrible.
As long as someone is not wooden, he is not terrible and eastern.
If Mark is not eastern, then Quinn is not wooden.
If Mark is practical, then Brian is perfect and Quinn is not wooden, and vice versa.
If someone is not terrible and not practical, then he is perfect, and vice versa.
Quinn being wooden is equivalent to Brian being perfect and Mark being not practical.
If there is someone who is not eastern, then Sloane is helpful.
Someone being both not perfect and helpful is equivalent to being terrible and not eastern.
Peter being not eastern or Brian being wooden implies that Peter is perfect.
Someone who is not practical is always both not perfect and not eastern. | Peter is not perfect. | self_contradiction |
Peter is not terrible.
Sloane is not perfect.
Peter is wooden.
Mark is practical.
Alice is terrible.
Mark is wooden.
Alice is not wooden.
Mark is eastern.
Quinn is not wooden.
Peter is not practical.
Bruno is terrible.
Bruno is perfect.Bruno being terrible implies that Peter is not eastern and Bruno is not wooden.
If someone is terrible or perfect, then he is wooden.
If there is at least one people who is both not wooden and perfect, then Alice is terrible.
As long as someone is not wooden, he is not terrible and eastern.
If Mark is not eastern, then Quinn is not wooden.
If Mark is practical, then Brian is perfect and Quinn is not wooden, and vice versa.
If someone is not terrible and not practical, then he is perfect, and vice versa.
Quinn being wooden is equivalent to Brian being perfect and Mark being not practical.
If there is someone who is not eastern, then Sloane is helpful.
Someone being both not perfect and helpful is equivalent to being terrible and not eastern.
Peter being not eastern or Brian being wooden implies that Peter is perfect.
Someone who is not practical is always both not perfect and not eastern. | Sloane is terrible. | entailment |
Peter is not terrible.
Sloane is not perfect.
Peter is wooden.
Mark is practical.
Alice is terrible.
Mark is wooden.
Alice is not wooden.
Mark is eastern.
Quinn is not wooden.
Peter is not practical.
Bruno is terrible.
Bruno is perfect.Bruno being terrible implies that Peter is not eastern and Bruno is not wooden.
If someone is terrible or perfect, then he is wooden.
If there is at least one people who is both not wooden and perfect, then Alice is terrible.
As long as someone is not wooden, he is not terrible and eastern.
If Mark is not eastern, then Quinn is not wooden.
If Mark is practical, then Brian is perfect and Quinn is not wooden, and vice versa.
If someone is not terrible and not practical, then he is perfect, and vice versa.
Quinn being wooden is equivalent to Brian being perfect and Mark being not practical.
If there is someone who is not eastern, then Sloane is helpful.
Someone being both not perfect and helpful is equivalent to being terrible and not eastern.
Peter being not eastern or Brian being wooden implies that Peter is perfect.
Someone who is not practical is always both not perfect and not eastern. | Peter is not terrible. | entailment |
Peter is not terrible.
Sloane is not perfect.
Peter is wooden.
Mark is practical.
Alice is terrible.
Mark is wooden.
Alice is not wooden.
Mark is eastern.
Quinn is not wooden.
Peter is not practical.
Bruno is terrible.
Bruno is perfect.Bruno being terrible implies that Peter is not eastern and Bruno is not wooden.
If someone is terrible or perfect, then he is wooden.
If there is at least one people who is both not wooden and perfect, then Alice is terrible.
As long as someone is not wooden, he is not terrible and eastern.
If Mark is not eastern, then Quinn is not wooden.
If Mark is practical, then Brian is perfect and Quinn is not wooden, and vice versa.
If someone is not terrible and not practical, then he is perfect, and vice versa.
Quinn being wooden is equivalent to Brian being perfect and Mark being not practical.
If there is someone who is not eastern, then Sloane is helpful.
Someone being both not perfect and helpful is equivalent to being terrible and not eastern.
Peter being not eastern or Brian being wooden implies that Peter is perfect.
Someone who is not practical is always both not perfect and not eastern. | Brian is not perfect. | self_contradiction |
Peter is not terrible.
Sloane is not perfect.
Peter is wooden.
Mark is practical.
Alice is terrible.
Mark is wooden.
Alice is not wooden.
Mark is eastern.
Quinn is not wooden.
Peter is not practical.
Bruno is terrible.
Bruno is perfect.Bruno being terrible implies that Peter is not eastern and Bruno is not wooden.
If someone is terrible or perfect, then he is wooden.
If there is at least one people who is both not wooden and perfect, then Alice is terrible.
As long as someone is not wooden, he is not terrible and eastern.
If Mark is not eastern, then Quinn is not wooden.
If Mark is practical, then Brian is perfect and Quinn is not wooden, and vice versa.
If someone is not terrible and not practical, then he is perfect, and vice versa.
Quinn being wooden is equivalent to Brian being perfect and Mark being not practical.
If there is someone who is not eastern, then Sloane is helpful.
Someone being both not perfect and helpful is equivalent to being terrible and not eastern.
Peter being not eastern or Brian being wooden implies that Peter is perfect.
Someone who is not practical is always both not perfect and not eastern. | Peter is terrible. | contradiction |
Peter is not terrible.
Sloane is not perfect.
Peter is wooden.
Mark is practical.
Alice is terrible.
Mark is wooden.
Alice is not wooden.
Mark is eastern.
Quinn is not wooden.
Peter is not practical.
Bruno is terrible.
Bruno is perfect.Bruno being terrible implies that Peter is not eastern and Bruno is not wooden.
If someone is terrible or perfect, then he is wooden.
If there is at least one people who is both not wooden and perfect, then Alice is terrible.
As long as someone is not wooden, he is not terrible and eastern.
If Mark is not eastern, then Quinn is not wooden.
If Mark is practical, then Brian is perfect and Quinn is not wooden, and vice versa.
If someone is not terrible and not practical, then he is perfect, and vice versa.
Quinn being wooden is equivalent to Brian being perfect and Mark being not practical.
If there is someone who is not eastern, then Sloane is helpful.
Someone being both not perfect and helpful is equivalent to being terrible and not eastern.
Peter being not eastern or Brian being wooden implies that Peter is perfect.
Someone who is not practical is always both not perfect and not eastern. | Quinn is not terrible. | entailment |
Peter is not terrible.
Sloane is not perfect.
Peter is wooden.
Mark is practical.
Alice is terrible.
Mark is wooden.
Alice is not wooden.
Mark is eastern.
Quinn is not wooden.
Peter is not practical.
Bruno is terrible.
Bruno is perfect.Bruno being terrible implies that Peter is not eastern and Bruno is not wooden.
If someone is terrible or perfect, then he is wooden.
If there is at least one people who is both not wooden and perfect, then Alice is terrible.
As long as someone is not wooden, he is not terrible and eastern.
If Mark is not eastern, then Quinn is not wooden.
If Mark is practical, then Brian is perfect and Quinn is not wooden, and vice versa.
If someone is not terrible and not practical, then he is perfect, and vice versa.
Quinn being wooden is equivalent to Brian being perfect and Mark being not practical.
If there is someone who is not eastern, then Sloane is helpful.
Someone being both not perfect and helpful is equivalent to being terrible and not eastern.
Peter being not eastern or Brian being wooden implies that Peter is perfect.
Someone who is not practical is always both not perfect and not eastern. | Mark is not eastern. | contradiction |
Peter is not terrible.
Sloane is not perfect.
Peter is wooden.
Mark is practical.
Alice is terrible.
Mark is wooden.
Alice is not wooden.
Mark is eastern.
Quinn is not wooden.
Peter is not practical.
Bruno is terrible.
Bruno is perfect.Bruno being terrible implies that Peter is not eastern and Bruno is not wooden.
If someone is terrible or perfect, then he is wooden.
If there is at least one people who is both not wooden and perfect, then Alice is terrible.
As long as someone is not wooden, he is not terrible and eastern.
If Mark is not eastern, then Quinn is not wooden.
If Mark is practical, then Brian is perfect and Quinn is not wooden, and vice versa.
If someone is not terrible and not practical, then he is perfect, and vice versa.
Quinn being wooden is equivalent to Brian being perfect and Mark being not practical.
If there is someone who is not eastern, then Sloane is helpful.
Someone being both not perfect and helpful is equivalent to being terrible and not eastern.
Peter being not eastern or Brian being wooden implies that Peter is perfect.
Someone who is not practical is always both not perfect and not eastern. | Quinn is terrible. | contradiction |
Peter is not terrible.
Sloane is not perfect.
Peter is wooden.
Mark is practical.
Alice is terrible.
Mark is wooden.
Alice is not wooden.
Mark is eastern.
Quinn is not wooden.
Peter is not practical.
Bruno is terrible.
Bruno is perfect.Bruno being terrible implies that Peter is not eastern and Bruno is not wooden.
If someone is terrible or perfect, then he is wooden.
If there is at least one people who is both not wooden and perfect, then Alice is terrible.
As long as someone is not wooden, he is not terrible and eastern.
If Mark is not eastern, then Quinn is not wooden.
If Mark is practical, then Brian is perfect and Quinn is not wooden, and vice versa.
If someone is not terrible and not practical, then he is perfect, and vice versa.
Quinn being wooden is equivalent to Brian being perfect and Mark being not practical.
If there is someone who is not eastern, then Sloane is helpful.
Someone being both not perfect and helpful is equivalent to being terrible and not eastern.
Peter being not eastern or Brian being wooden implies that Peter is perfect.
Someone who is not practical is always both not perfect and not eastern. | Brian is eastern. | contradiction |
Peter is not terrible.
Sloane is not perfect.
Peter is wooden.
Mark is practical.
Alice is terrible.
Mark is wooden.
Alice is not wooden.
Mark is eastern.
Quinn is not wooden.
Peter is not practical.
Bruno is terrible.
Bruno is perfect.Bruno being terrible implies that Peter is not eastern and Bruno is not wooden.
If someone is terrible or perfect, then he is wooden.
If there is at least one people who is both not wooden and perfect, then Alice is terrible.
As long as someone is not wooden, he is not terrible and eastern.
If Mark is not eastern, then Quinn is not wooden.
If Mark is practical, then Brian is perfect and Quinn is not wooden, and vice versa.
If someone is not terrible and not practical, then he is perfect, and vice versa.
Quinn being wooden is equivalent to Brian being perfect and Mark being not practical.
If there is someone who is not eastern, then Sloane is helpful.
Someone being both not perfect and helpful is equivalent to being terrible and not eastern.
Peter being not eastern or Brian being wooden implies that Peter is perfect.
Someone who is not practical is always both not perfect and not eastern. | Peter is perfect. | self_contradiction |
Peter is not terrible.
Sloane is not perfect.
Peter is wooden.
Mark is practical.
Alice is terrible.
Mark is wooden.
Alice is not wooden.
Mark is eastern.
Quinn is not wooden.
Peter is not practical.
Bruno is terrible.
Bruno is perfect.Bruno being terrible implies that Peter is not eastern and Bruno is not wooden.
If someone is terrible or perfect, then he is wooden.
If there is at least one people who is both not wooden and perfect, then Alice is terrible.
As long as someone is not wooden, he is not terrible and eastern.
If Mark is not eastern, then Quinn is not wooden.
If Mark is practical, then Brian is perfect and Quinn is not wooden, and vice versa.
If someone is not terrible and not practical, then he is perfect, and vice versa.
Quinn being wooden is equivalent to Brian being perfect and Mark being not practical.
If there is someone who is not eastern, then Sloane is helpful.
Someone being both not perfect and helpful is equivalent to being terrible and not eastern.
Peter being not eastern or Brian being wooden implies that Peter is perfect.
Someone who is not practical is always both not perfect and not eastern. | Quinn is perfect. | neutral |
Peter is not terrible.
Sloane is not perfect.
Peter is wooden.
Mark is practical.
Alice is terrible.
Mark is wooden.
Alice is not wooden.
Mark is eastern.
Quinn is not wooden.
Peter is not practical.
Bruno is terrible.
Bruno is perfect.Bruno being terrible implies that Peter is not eastern and Bruno is not wooden.
If someone is terrible or perfect, then he is wooden.
If there is at least one people who is both not wooden and perfect, then Alice is terrible.
As long as someone is not wooden, he is not terrible and eastern.
If Mark is not eastern, then Quinn is not wooden.
If Mark is practical, then Brian is perfect and Quinn is not wooden, and vice versa.
If someone is not terrible and not practical, then he is perfect, and vice versa.
Quinn being wooden is equivalent to Brian being perfect and Mark being not practical.
If there is someone who is not eastern, then Sloane is helpful.
Someone being both not perfect and helpful is equivalent to being terrible and not eastern.
Peter being not eastern or Brian being wooden implies that Peter is perfect.
Someone who is not practical is always both not perfect and not eastern. | Sloane is practical. | neutral |
Peter is not terrible.
Sloane is not perfect.
Peter is wooden.
Mark is practical.
Alice is terrible.
Mark is wooden.
Alice is not wooden.
Mark is eastern.
Quinn is not wooden.
Peter is not practical.
Bruno is terrible.
Bruno is perfect.Bruno being terrible implies that Peter is not eastern and Bruno is not wooden.
If someone is terrible or perfect, then he is wooden.
If there is at least one people who is both not wooden and perfect, then Alice is terrible.
As long as someone is not wooden, he is not terrible and eastern.
If Mark is not eastern, then Quinn is not wooden.
If Mark is practical, then Brian is perfect and Quinn is not wooden, and vice versa.
If someone is not terrible and not practical, then he is perfect, and vice versa.
Quinn being wooden is equivalent to Brian being perfect and Mark being not practical.
If there is someone who is not eastern, then Sloane is helpful.
Someone being both not perfect and helpful is equivalent to being terrible and not eastern.
Peter being not eastern or Brian being wooden implies that Peter is perfect.
Someone who is not practical is always both not perfect and not eastern. | Brian is not helpful. | neutral |
Alexia is not dangerous.
Alexia is not old-fashioned.
Olaf is not nice.
Olaf is cool.
Heath is not informal.
Heath is not nice.
Eunice is old-fashioned.
Jacob is not nice.
Heath is not old-fashioned.
Eunice is dangerous.
Cuthbert is old-fashioned.
Jacob is old-fashioned.If someone is not informal, then he is nice, and vice versa.
All not informal people are cool.
If Jacob is nice, then Rachelle is shy and Rachelle is not informal, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both nice and not informal, then Eunice is not dangerous.
Someone is dangerous if and only if he is old-fashioned.
Olaf being not nice is equivalent to Eunice being not dangerous.
It can be concluded that Cuthbert is informal once knowing that Olaf is old-fashioned.
If someone is nice, then he is both not shy and not old-fashioned.
All not informal people are dangerous.
If someone is dangerous, then he is both not informal and cool.
If someone is not dangerous or he is not cool, then he is shy.
As long as someone is either not shy or old-fashioned, he is nice and not informal. | Olaf is informal. | neutral |
Alexia is not dangerous.
Alexia is not old-fashioned.
Olaf is not nice.
Olaf is cool.
Heath is not informal.
Heath is not nice.
Eunice is old-fashioned.
Jacob is not nice.
Heath is not old-fashioned.
Eunice is dangerous.
Cuthbert is old-fashioned.
Jacob is old-fashioned.If someone is not informal, then he is nice, and vice versa.
All not informal people are cool.
If Jacob is nice, then Rachelle is shy and Rachelle is not informal, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both nice and not informal, then Eunice is not dangerous.
Someone is dangerous if and only if he is old-fashioned.
Olaf being not nice is equivalent to Eunice being not dangerous.
It can be concluded that Cuthbert is informal once knowing that Olaf is old-fashioned.
If someone is nice, then he is both not shy and not old-fashioned.
All not informal people are dangerous.
If someone is dangerous, then he is both not informal and cool.
If someone is not dangerous or he is not cool, then he is shy.
As long as someone is either not shy or old-fashioned, he is nice and not informal. | Olaf is not shy. | neutral |
Alexia is not dangerous.
Alexia is not old-fashioned.
Olaf is not nice.
Olaf is cool.
Heath is not informal.
Heath is not nice.
Eunice is old-fashioned.
Jacob is not nice.
Heath is not old-fashioned.
Eunice is dangerous.
Cuthbert is old-fashioned.
Jacob is old-fashioned.If someone is not informal, then he is nice, and vice versa.
All not informal people are cool.
If Jacob is nice, then Rachelle is shy and Rachelle is not informal, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both nice and not informal, then Eunice is not dangerous.
Someone is dangerous if and only if he is old-fashioned.
Olaf being not nice is equivalent to Eunice being not dangerous.
It can be concluded that Cuthbert is informal once knowing that Olaf is old-fashioned.
If someone is nice, then he is both not shy and not old-fashioned.
All not informal people are dangerous.
If someone is dangerous, then he is both not informal and cool.
If someone is not dangerous or he is not cool, then he is shy.
As long as someone is either not shy or old-fashioned, he is nice and not informal. | Jacob is not dangerous. | contradiction |
Alexia is not dangerous.
Alexia is not old-fashioned.
Olaf is not nice.
Olaf is cool.
Heath is not informal.
Heath is not nice.
Eunice is old-fashioned.
Jacob is not nice.
Heath is not old-fashioned.
Eunice is dangerous.
Cuthbert is old-fashioned.
Jacob is old-fashioned.If someone is not informal, then he is nice, and vice versa.
All not informal people are cool.
If Jacob is nice, then Rachelle is shy and Rachelle is not informal, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both nice and not informal, then Eunice is not dangerous.
Someone is dangerous if and only if he is old-fashioned.
Olaf being not nice is equivalent to Eunice being not dangerous.
It can be concluded that Cuthbert is informal once knowing that Olaf is old-fashioned.
If someone is nice, then he is both not shy and not old-fashioned.
All not informal people are dangerous.
If someone is dangerous, then he is both not informal and cool.
If someone is not dangerous or he is not cool, then he is shy.
As long as someone is either not shy or old-fashioned, he is nice and not informal. | Jacob is informal. | contradiction |
Alexia is not dangerous.
Alexia is not old-fashioned.
Olaf is not nice.
Olaf is cool.
Heath is not informal.
Heath is not nice.
Eunice is old-fashioned.
Jacob is not nice.
Heath is not old-fashioned.
Eunice is dangerous.
Cuthbert is old-fashioned.
Jacob is old-fashioned.If someone is not informal, then he is nice, and vice versa.
All not informal people are cool.
If Jacob is nice, then Rachelle is shy and Rachelle is not informal, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both nice and not informal, then Eunice is not dangerous.
Someone is dangerous if and only if he is old-fashioned.
Olaf being not nice is equivalent to Eunice being not dangerous.
It can be concluded that Cuthbert is informal once knowing that Olaf is old-fashioned.
If someone is nice, then he is both not shy and not old-fashioned.
All not informal people are dangerous.
If someone is dangerous, then he is both not informal and cool.
If someone is not dangerous or he is not cool, then he is shy.
As long as someone is either not shy or old-fashioned, he is nice and not informal. | Cuthbert is not cool. | contradiction |
Alexia is not dangerous.
Alexia is not old-fashioned.
Olaf is not nice.
Olaf is cool.
Heath is not informal.
Heath is not nice.
Eunice is old-fashioned.
Jacob is not nice.
Heath is not old-fashioned.
Eunice is dangerous.
Cuthbert is old-fashioned.
Jacob is old-fashioned.If someone is not informal, then he is nice, and vice versa.
All not informal people are cool.
If Jacob is nice, then Rachelle is shy and Rachelle is not informal, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both nice and not informal, then Eunice is not dangerous.
Someone is dangerous if and only if he is old-fashioned.
Olaf being not nice is equivalent to Eunice being not dangerous.
It can be concluded that Cuthbert is informal once knowing that Olaf is old-fashioned.
If someone is nice, then he is both not shy and not old-fashioned.
All not informal people are dangerous.
If someone is dangerous, then he is both not informal and cool.
If someone is not dangerous or he is not cool, then he is shy.
As long as someone is either not shy or old-fashioned, he is nice and not informal. | Olaf is old-fashioned. | neutral |
Alexia is not dangerous.
Alexia is not old-fashioned.
Olaf is not nice.
Olaf is cool.
Heath is not informal.
Heath is not nice.
Eunice is old-fashioned.
Jacob is not nice.
Heath is not old-fashioned.
Eunice is dangerous.
Cuthbert is old-fashioned.
Jacob is old-fashioned.If someone is not informal, then he is nice, and vice versa.
All not informal people are cool.
If Jacob is nice, then Rachelle is shy and Rachelle is not informal, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both nice and not informal, then Eunice is not dangerous.
Someone is dangerous if and only if he is old-fashioned.
Olaf being not nice is equivalent to Eunice being not dangerous.
It can be concluded that Cuthbert is informal once knowing that Olaf is old-fashioned.
If someone is nice, then he is both not shy and not old-fashioned.
All not informal people are dangerous.
If someone is dangerous, then he is both not informal and cool.
If someone is not dangerous or he is not cool, then he is shy.
As long as someone is either not shy or old-fashioned, he is nice and not informal. | Alexia is shy. | entailment |
Alexia is not dangerous.
Alexia is not old-fashioned.
Olaf is not nice.
Olaf is cool.
Heath is not informal.
Heath is not nice.
Eunice is old-fashioned.
Jacob is not nice.
Heath is not old-fashioned.
Eunice is dangerous.
Cuthbert is old-fashioned.
Jacob is old-fashioned.If someone is not informal, then he is nice, and vice versa.
All not informal people are cool.
If Jacob is nice, then Rachelle is shy and Rachelle is not informal, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both nice and not informal, then Eunice is not dangerous.
Someone is dangerous if and only if he is old-fashioned.
Olaf being not nice is equivalent to Eunice being not dangerous.
It can be concluded that Cuthbert is informal once knowing that Olaf is old-fashioned.
If someone is nice, then he is both not shy and not old-fashioned.
All not informal people are dangerous.
If someone is dangerous, then he is both not informal and cool.
If someone is not dangerous or he is not cool, then he is shy.
As long as someone is either not shy or old-fashioned, he is nice and not informal. | Eunice is not dangerous. | self_contradiction |
Alexia is not dangerous.
Alexia is not old-fashioned.
Olaf is not nice.
Olaf is cool.
Heath is not informal.
Heath is not nice.
Eunice is old-fashioned.
Jacob is not nice.
Heath is not old-fashioned.
Eunice is dangerous.
Cuthbert is old-fashioned.
Jacob is old-fashioned.If someone is not informal, then he is nice, and vice versa.
All not informal people are cool.
If Jacob is nice, then Rachelle is shy and Rachelle is not informal, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both nice and not informal, then Eunice is not dangerous.
Someone is dangerous if and only if he is old-fashioned.
Olaf being not nice is equivalent to Eunice being not dangerous.
It can be concluded that Cuthbert is informal once knowing that Olaf is old-fashioned.
If someone is nice, then he is both not shy and not old-fashioned.
All not informal people are dangerous.
If someone is dangerous, then he is both not informal and cool.
If someone is not dangerous or he is not cool, then he is shy.
As long as someone is either not shy or old-fashioned, he is nice and not informal. | Jacob is not nice. | self_contradiction |
Alexia is not dangerous.
Alexia is not old-fashioned.
Olaf is not nice.
Olaf is cool.
Heath is not informal.
Heath is not nice.
Eunice is old-fashioned.
Jacob is not nice.
Heath is not old-fashioned.
Eunice is dangerous.
Cuthbert is old-fashioned.
Jacob is old-fashioned.If someone is not informal, then he is nice, and vice versa.
All not informal people are cool.
If Jacob is nice, then Rachelle is shy and Rachelle is not informal, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both nice and not informal, then Eunice is not dangerous.
Someone is dangerous if and only if he is old-fashioned.
Olaf being not nice is equivalent to Eunice being not dangerous.
It can be concluded that Cuthbert is informal once knowing that Olaf is old-fashioned.
If someone is nice, then he is both not shy and not old-fashioned.
All not informal people are dangerous.
If someone is dangerous, then he is both not informal and cool.
If someone is not dangerous or he is not cool, then he is shy.
As long as someone is either not shy or old-fashioned, he is nice and not informal. | Heath is shy. | contradiction |
Alexia is not dangerous.
Alexia is not old-fashioned.
Olaf is not nice.
Olaf is cool.
Heath is not informal.
Heath is not nice.
Eunice is old-fashioned.
Jacob is not nice.
Heath is not old-fashioned.
Eunice is dangerous.
Cuthbert is old-fashioned.
Jacob is old-fashioned.If someone is not informal, then he is nice, and vice versa.
All not informal people are cool.
If Jacob is nice, then Rachelle is shy and Rachelle is not informal, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both nice and not informal, then Eunice is not dangerous.
Someone is dangerous if and only if he is old-fashioned.
Olaf being not nice is equivalent to Eunice being not dangerous.
It can be concluded that Cuthbert is informal once knowing that Olaf is old-fashioned.
If someone is nice, then he is both not shy and not old-fashioned.
All not informal people are dangerous.
If someone is dangerous, then he is both not informal and cool.
If someone is not dangerous or he is not cool, then he is shy.
As long as someone is either not shy or old-fashioned, he is nice and not informal. | Cuthbert is old-fashioned. | self_contradiction |
Alexia is not dangerous.
Alexia is not old-fashioned.
Olaf is not nice.
Olaf is cool.
Heath is not informal.
Heath is not nice.
Eunice is old-fashioned.
Jacob is not nice.
Heath is not old-fashioned.
Eunice is dangerous.
Cuthbert is old-fashioned.
Jacob is old-fashioned.If someone is not informal, then he is nice, and vice versa.
All not informal people are cool.
If Jacob is nice, then Rachelle is shy and Rachelle is not informal, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both nice and not informal, then Eunice is not dangerous.
Someone is dangerous if and only if he is old-fashioned.
Olaf being not nice is equivalent to Eunice being not dangerous.
It can be concluded that Cuthbert is informal once knowing that Olaf is old-fashioned.
If someone is nice, then he is both not shy and not old-fashioned.
All not informal people are dangerous.
If someone is dangerous, then he is both not informal and cool.
If someone is not dangerous or he is not cool, then he is shy.
As long as someone is either not shy or old-fashioned, he is nice and not informal. | Cuthbert is cool. | entailment |
Alexia is not dangerous.
Alexia is not old-fashioned.
Olaf is not nice.
Olaf is cool.
Heath is not informal.
Heath is not nice.
Eunice is old-fashioned.
Jacob is not nice.
Heath is not old-fashioned.
Eunice is dangerous.
Cuthbert is old-fashioned.
Jacob is old-fashioned.If someone is not informal, then he is nice, and vice versa.
All not informal people are cool.
If Jacob is nice, then Rachelle is shy and Rachelle is not informal, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both nice and not informal, then Eunice is not dangerous.
Someone is dangerous if and only if he is old-fashioned.
Olaf being not nice is equivalent to Eunice being not dangerous.
It can be concluded that Cuthbert is informal once knowing that Olaf is old-fashioned.
If someone is nice, then he is both not shy and not old-fashioned.
All not informal people are dangerous.
If someone is dangerous, then he is both not informal and cool.
If someone is not dangerous or he is not cool, then he is shy.
As long as someone is either not shy or old-fashioned, he is nice and not informal. | Jacob is not shy. | entailment |
Alexia is not dangerous.
Alexia is not old-fashioned.
Olaf is not nice.
Olaf is cool.
Heath is not informal.
Heath is not nice.
Eunice is old-fashioned.
Jacob is not nice.
Heath is not old-fashioned.
Eunice is dangerous.
Cuthbert is old-fashioned.
Jacob is old-fashioned.If someone is not informal, then he is nice, and vice versa.
All not informal people are cool.
If Jacob is nice, then Rachelle is shy and Rachelle is not informal, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both nice and not informal, then Eunice is not dangerous.
Someone is dangerous if and only if he is old-fashioned.
Olaf being not nice is equivalent to Eunice being not dangerous.
It can be concluded that Cuthbert is informal once knowing that Olaf is old-fashioned.
If someone is nice, then he is both not shy and not old-fashioned.
All not informal people are dangerous.
If someone is dangerous, then he is both not informal and cool.
If someone is not dangerous or he is not cool, then he is shy.
As long as someone is either not shy or old-fashioned, he is nice and not informal. | Rachelle is not nice. | contradiction |
Alexia is not dangerous.
Alexia is not old-fashioned.
Olaf is not nice.
Olaf is cool.
Heath is not informal.
Heath is not nice.
Eunice is old-fashioned.
Jacob is not nice.
Heath is not old-fashioned.
Eunice is dangerous.
Cuthbert is old-fashioned.
Jacob is old-fashioned.If someone is not informal, then he is nice, and vice versa.
All not informal people are cool.
If Jacob is nice, then Rachelle is shy and Rachelle is not informal, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both nice and not informal, then Eunice is not dangerous.
Someone is dangerous if and only if he is old-fashioned.
Olaf being not nice is equivalent to Eunice being not dangerous.
It can be concluded that Cuthbert is informal once knowing that Olaf is old-fashioned.
If someone is nice, then he is both not shy and not old-fashioned.
All not informal people are dangerous.
If someone is dangerous, then he is both not informal and cool.
If someone is not dangerous or he is not cool, then he is shy.
As long as someone is either not shy or old-fashioned, he is nice and not informal. | Eunice is dangerous. | self_contradiction |
Alexia is not dangerous.
Alexia is not old-fashioned.
Olaf is not nice.
Olaf is cool.
Heath is not informal.
Heath is not nice.
Eunice is old-fashioned.
Jacob is not nice.
Heath is not old-fashioned.
Eunice is dangerous.
Cuthbert is old-fashioned.
Jacob is old-fashioned.If someone is not informal, then he is nice, and vice versa.
All not informal people are cool.
If Jacob is nice, then Rachelle is shy and Rachelle is not informal, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both nice and not informal, then Eunice is not dangerous.
Someone is dangerous if and only if he is old-fashioned.
Olaf being not nice is equivalent to Eunice being not dangerous.
It can be concluded that Cuthbert is informal once knowing that Olaf is old-fashioned.
If someone is nice, then he is both not shy and not old-fashioned.
All not informal people are dangerous.
If someone is dangerous, then he is both not informal and cool.
If someone is not dangerous or he is not cool, then he is shy.
As long as someone is either not shy or old-fashioned, he is nice and not informal. | Alexia is not nice. | neutral |
Alexia is not dangerous.
Alexia is not old-fashioned.
Olaf is not nice.
Olaf is cool.
Heath is not informal.
Heath is not nice.
Eunice is old-fashioned.
Jacob is not nice.
Heath is not old-fashioned.
Eunice is dangerous.
Cuthbert is old-fashioned.
Jacob is old-fashioned.If someone is not informal, then he is nice, and vice versa.
All not informal people are cool.
If Jacob is nice, then Rachelle is shy and Rachelle is not informal, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both nice and not informal, then Eunice is not dangerous.
Someone is dangerous if and only if he is old-fashioned.
Olaf being not nice is equivalent to Eunice being not dangerous.
It can be concluded that Cuthbert is informal once knowing that Olaf is old-fashioned.
If someone is nice, then he is both not shy and not old-fashioned.
All not informal people are dangerous.
If someone is dangerous, then he is both not informal and cool.
If someone is not dangerous or he is not cool, then he is shy.
As long as someone is either not shy or old-fashioned, he is nice and not informal. | Heath is not old-fashioned. | self_contradiction |
Alexia is not dangerous.
Alexia is not old-fashioned.
Olaf is not nice.
Olaf is cool.
Heath is not informal.
Heath is not nice.
Eunice is old-fashioned.
Jacob is not nice.
Heath is not old-fashioned.
Eunice is dangerous.
Cuthbert is old-fashioned.
Jacob is old-fashioned.If someone is not informal, then he is nice, and vice versa.
All not informal people are cool.
If Jacob is nice, then Rachelle is shy and Rachelle is not informal, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both nice and not informal, then Eunice is not dangerous.
Someone is dangerous if and only if he is old-fashioned.
Olaf being not nice is equivalent to Eunice being not dangerous.
It can be concluded that Cuthbert is informal once knowing that Olaf is old-fashioned.
If someone is nice, then he is both not shy and not old-fashioned.
All not informal people are dangerous.
If someone is dangerous, then he is both not informal and cool.
If someone is not dangerous or he is not cool, then he is shy.
As long as someone is either not shy or old-fashioned, he is nice and not informal. | Alexia is not cool. | neutral |
Alexia is not dangerous.
Alexia is not old-fashioned.
Olaf is not nice.
Olaf is cool.
Heath is not informal.
Heath is not nice.
Eunice is old-fashioned.
Jacob is not nice.
Heath is not old-fashioned.
Eunice is dangerous.
Cuthbert is old-fashioned.
Jacob is old-fashioned.If someone is not informal, then he is nice, and vice versa.
All not informal people are cool.
If Jacob is nice, then Rachelle is shy and Rachelle is not informal, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both nice and not informal, then Eunice is not dangerous.
Someone is dangerous if and only if he is old-fashioned.
Olaf being not nice is equivalent to Eunice being not dangerous.
It can be concluded that Cuthbert is informal once knowing that Olaf is old-fashioned.
If someone is nice, then he is both not shy and not old-fashioned.
All not informal people are dangerous.
If someone is dangerous, then he is both not informal and cool.
If someone is not dangerous or he is not cool, then he is shy.
As long as someone is either not shy or old-fashioned, he is nice and not informal. | Cuthbert is not informal. | entailment |
Alexia is not dangerous.
Alexia is not old-fashioned.
Olaf is not nice.
Olaf is cool.
Heath is not informal.
Heath is not nice.
Eunice is old-fashioned.
Jacob is not nice.
Heath is not old-fashioned.
Eunice is dangerous.
Cuthbert is old-fashioned.
Jacob is old-fashioned.If someone is not informal, then he is nice, and vice versa.
All not informal people are cool.
If Jacob is nice, then Rachelle is shy and Rachelle is not informal, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both nice and not informal, then Eunice is not dangerous.
Someone is dangerous if and only if he is old-fashioned.
Olaf being not nice is equivalent to Eunice being not dangerous.
It can be concluded that Cuthbert is informal once knowing that Olaf is old-fashioned.
If someone is nice, then he is both not shy and not old-fashioned.
All not informal people are dangerous.
If someone is dangerous, then he is both not informal and cool.
If someone is not dangerous or he is not cool, then he is shy.
As long as someone is either not shy or old-fashioned, he is nice and not informal. | Jacob is dangerous. | entailment |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.