premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Neil is not big.
Sean is not funny.
Roy is electrical.
Baldwin is not electrical.
Neil is not important.
Melville is important.
Sean is not pleasant.
Baldwin is funny.
Melville is not funny.
Neil is not electrical.
Baldwin is not big.
Neil is not pleasant.If Melville is not funny and Roy is pleasant, then Neil is big and Melville is right, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is important, then Pierce is funny.
Someone is electrical and pleasant if and only if he is not funny and not big.
If there is someone who is not right, then Melville is not funny and Pierce is not pleasant.
Lionel being important implies that Lionel is pleasant.
All not right people are not important.
If someone is pleasant, then he is both not funny and not right.
If there is at least one people who is not big, then Lionel is not funny and Pierce is not important.
Someone who is not electrical is always both not important and not big.
If there is someone who is either not important or not funny, then Lionel is right.
Someone who is electrical is always not big.
If someone is not big, then he is pleasant, and vice versa. | Roy is right. | contradiction |
Neil is not big.
Sean is not funny.
Roy is electrical.
Baldwin is not electrical.
Neil is not important.
Melville is important.
Sean is not pleasant.
Baldwin is funny.
Melville is not funny.
Neil is not electrical.
Baldwin is not big.
Neil is not pleasant.If Melville is not funny and Roy is pleasant, then Neil is big and Melville is right, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is important, then Pierce is funny.
Someone is electrical and pleasant if and only if he is not funny and not big.
If there is someone who is not right, then Melville is not funny and Pierce is not pleasant.
Lionel being important implies that Lionel is pleasant.
All not right people are not important.
If someone is pleasant, then he is both not funny and not right.
If there is at least one people who is not big, then Lionel is not funny and Pierce is not important.
Someone who is not electrical is always both not important and not big.
If there is someone who is either not important or not funny, then Lionel is right.
Someone who is electrical is always not big.
If someone is not big, then he is pleasant, and vice versa. | Roy is not funny. | entailment |
Neil is not big.
Sean is not funny.
Roy is electrical.
Baldwin is not electrical.
Neil is not important.
Melville is important.
Sean is not pleasant.
Baldwin is funny.
Melville is not funny.
Neil is not electrical.
Baldwin is not big.
Neil is not pleasant.If Melville is not funny and Roy is pleasant, then Neil is big and Melville is right, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is important, then Pierce is funny.
Someone is electrical and pleasant if and only if he is not funny and not big.
If there is someone who is not right, then Melville is not funny and Pierce is not pleasant.
Lionel being important implies that Lionel is pleasant.
All not right people are not important.
If someone is pleasant, then he is both not funny and not right.
If there is at least one people who is not big, then Lionel is not funny and Pierce is not important.
Someone who is not electrical is always both not important and not big.
If there is someone who is either not important or not funny, then Lionel is right.
Someone who is electrical is always not big.
If someone is not big, then he is pleasant, and vice versa. | Melville is big. | neutral |
Neil is not big.
Sean is not funny.
Roy is electrical.
Baldwin is not electrical.
Neil is not important.
Melville is important.
Sean is not pleasant.
Baldwin is funny.
Melville is not funny.
Neil is not electrical.
Baldwin is not big.
Neil is not pleasant.If Melville is not funny and Roy is pleasant, then Neil is big and Melville is right, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is important, then Pierce is funny.
Someone is electrical and pleasant if and only if he is not funny and not big.
If there is someone who is not right, then Melville is not funny and Pierce is not pleasant.
Lionel being important implies that Lionel is pleasant.
All not right people are not important.
If someone is pleasant, then he is both not funny and not right.
If there is at least one people who is not big, then Lionel is not funny and Pierce is not important.
Someone who is not electrical is always both not important and not big.
If there is someone who is either not important or not funny, then Lionel is right.
Someone who is electrical is always not big.
If someone is not big, then he is pleasant, and vice versa. | Baldwin is funny. | self_contradiction |
Neil is not big.
Sean is not funny.
Roy is electrical.
Baldwin is not electrical.
Neil is not important.
Melville is important.
Sean is not pleasant.
Baldwin is funny.
Melville is not funny.
Neil is not electrical.
Baldwin is not big.
Neil is not pleasant.If Melville is not funny and Roy is pleasant, then Neil is big and Melville is right, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is important, then Pierce is funny.
Someone is electrical and pleasant if and only if he is not funny and not big.
If there is someone who is not right, then Melville is not funny and Pierce is not pleasant.
Lionel being important implies that Lionel is pleasant.
All not right people are not important.
If someone is pleasant, then he is both not funny and not right.
If there is at least one people who is not big, then Lionel is not funny and Pierce is not important.
Someone who is not electrical is always both not important and not big.
If there is someone who is either not important or not funny, then Lionel is right.
Someone who is electrical is always not big.
If someone is not big, then he is pleasant, and vice versa. | Melville is not right. | contradiction |
Neil is not big.
Sean is not funny.
Roy is electrical.
Baldwin is not electrical.
Neil is not important.
Melville is important.
Sean is not pleasant.
Baldwin is funny.
Melville is not funny.
Neil is not electrical.
Baldwin is not big.
Neil is not pleasant.If Melville is not funny and Roy is pleasant, then Neil is big and Melville is right, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is important, then Pierce is funny.
Someone is electrical and pleasant if and only if he is not funny and not big.
If there is someone who is not right, then Melville is not funny and Pierce is not pleasant.
Lionel being important implies that Lionel is pleasant.
All not right people are not important.
If someone is pleasant, then he is both not funny and not right.
If there is at least one people who is not big, then Lionel is not funny and Pierce is not important.
Someone who is not electrical is always both not important and not big.
If there is someone who is either not important or not funny, then Lionel is right.
Someone who is electrical is always not big.
If someone is not big, then he is pleasant, and vice versa. | Pierce is right. | neutral |
Neil is not big.
Sean is not funny.
Roy is electrical.
Baldwin is not electrical.
Neil is not important.
Melville is important.
Sean is not pleasant.
Baldwin is funny.
Melville is not funny.
Neil is not electrical.
Baldwin is not big.
Neil is not pleasant.If Melville is not funny and Roy is pleasant, then Neil is big and Melville is right, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is important, then Pierce is funny.
Someone is electrical and pleasant if and only if he is not funny and not big.
If there is someone who is not right, then Melville is not funny and Pierce is not pleasant.
Lionel being important implies that Lionel is pleasant.
All not right people are not important.
If someone is pleasant, then he is both not funny and not right.
If there is at least one people who is not big, then Lionel is not funny and Pierce is not important.
Someone who is not electrical is always both not important and not big.
If there is someone who is either not important or not funny, then Lionel is right.
Someone who is electrical is always not big.
If someone is not big, then he is pleasant, and vice versa. | Roy is important. | contradiction |
Neil is not big.
Sean is not funny.
Roy is electrical.
Baldwin is not electrical.
Neil is not important.
Melville is important.
Sean is not pleasant.
Baldwin is funny.
Melville is not funny.
Neil is not electrical.
Baldwin is not big.
Neil is not pleasant.If Melville is not funny and Roy is pleasant, then Neil is big and Melville is right, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is important, then Pierce is funny.
Someone is electrical and pleasant if and only if he is not funny and not big.
If there is someone who is not right, then Melville is not funny and Pierce is not pleasant.
Lionel being important implies that Lionel is pleasant.
All not right people are not important.
If someone is pleasant, then he is both not funny and not right.
If there is at least one people who is not big, then Lionel is not funny and Pierce is not important.
Someone who is not electrical is always both not important and not big.
If there is someone who is either not important or not funny, then Lionel is right.
Someone who is electrical is always not big.
If someone is not big, then he is pleasant, and vice versa. | Baldwin is not pleasant. | contradiction |
Neil is not big.
Sean is not funny.
Roy is electrical.
Baldwin is not electrical.
Neil is not important.
Melville is important.
Sean is not pleasant.
Baldwin is funny.
Melville is not funny.
Neil is not electrical.
Baldwin is not big.
Neil is not pleasant.If Melville is not funny and Roy is pleasant, then Neil is big and Melville is right, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is important, then Pierce is funny.
Someone is electrical and pleasant if and only if he is not funny and not big.
If there is someone who is not right, then Melville is not funny and Pierce is not pleasant.
Lionel being important implies that Lionel is pleasant.
All not right people are not important.
If someone is pleasant, then he is both not funny and not right.
If there is at least one people who is not big, then Lionel is not funny and Pierce is not important.
Someone who is not electrical is always both not important and not big.
If there is someone who is either not important or not funny, then Lionel is right.
Someone who is electrical is always not big.
If someone is not big, then he is pleasant, and vice versa. | Baldwin is electrical. | self_contradiction |
Neil is not big.
Sean is not funny.
Roy is electrical.
Baldwin is not electrical.
Neil is not important.
Melville is important.
Sean is not pleasant.
Baldwin is funny.
Melville is not funny.
Neil is not electrical.
Baldwin is not big.
Neil is not pleasant.If Melville is not funny and Roy is pleasant, then Neil is big and Melville is right, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is important, then Pierce is funny.
Someone is electrical and pleasant if and only if he is not funny and not big.
If there is someone who is not right, then Melville is not funny and Pierce is not pleasant.
Lionel being important implies that Lionel is pleasant.
All not right people are not important.
If someone is pleasant, then he is both not funny and not right.
If there is at least one people who is not big, then Lionel is not funny and Pierce is not important.
Someone who is not electrical is always both not important and not big.
If there is someone who is either not important or not funny, then Lionel is right.
Someone who is electrical is always not big.
If someone is not big, then he is pleasant, and vice versa. | Neil is pleasant. | self_contradiction |
Neil is not big.
Sean is not funny.
Roy is electrical.
Baldwin is not electrical.
Neil is not important.
Melville is important.
Sean is not pleasant.
Baldwin is funny.
Melville is not funny.
Neil is not electrical.
Baldwin is not big.
Neil is not pleasant.If Melville is not funny and Roy is pleasant, then Neil is big and Melville is right, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is important, then Pierce is funny.
Someone is electrical and pleasant if and only if he is not funny and not big.
If there is someone who is not right, then Melville is not funny and Pierce is not pleasant.
Lionel being important implies that Lionel is pleasant.
All not right people are not important.
If someone is pleasant, then he is both not funny and not right.
If there is at least one people who is not big, then Lionel is not funny and Pierce is not important.
Someone who is not electrical is always both not important and not big.
If there is someone who is either not important or not funny, then Lionel is right.
Someone who is electrical is always not big.
If someone is not big, then he is pleasant, and vice versa. | Baldwin is not funny. | self_contradiction |
Neil is not big.
Sean is not funny.
Roy is electrical.
Baldwin is not electrical.
Neil is not important.
Melville is important.
Sean is not pleasant.
Baldwin is funny.
Melville is not funny.
Neil is not electrical.
Baldwin is not big.
Neil is not pleasant.If Melville is not funny and Roy is pleasant, then Neil is big and Melville is right, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is important, then Pierce is funny.
Someone is electrical and pleasant if and only if he is not funny and not big.
If there is someone who is not right, then Melville is not funny and Pierce is not pleasant.
Lionel being important implies that Lionel is pleasant.
All not right people are not important.
If someone is pleasant, then he is both not funny and not right.
If there is at least one people who is not big, then Lionel is not funny and Pierce is not important.
Someone who is not electrical is always both not important and not big.
If there is someone who is either not important or not funny, then Lionel is right.
Someone who is electrical is always not big.
If someone is not big, then he is pleasant, and vice versa. | Melville is electrical. | neutral |
Neil is not big.
Sean is not funny.
Roy is electrical.
Baldwin is not electrical.
Neil is not important.
Melville is important.
Sean is not pleasant.
Baldwin is funny.
Melville is not funny.
Neil is not electrical.
Baldwin is not big.
Neil is not pleasant.If Melville is not funny and Roy is pleasant, then Neil is big and Melville is right, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is important, then Pierce is funny.
Someone is electrical and pleasant if and only if he is not funny and not big.
If there is someone who is not right, then Melville is not funny and Pierce is not pleasant.
Lionel being important implies that Lionel is pleasant.
All not right people are not important.
If someone is pleasant, then he is both not funny and not right.
If there is at least one people who is not big, then Lionel is not funny and Pierce is not important.
Someone who is not electrical is always both not important and not big.
If there is someone who is either not important or not funny, then Lionel is right.
Someone who is electrical is always not big.
If someone is not big, then he is pleasant, and vice versa. | Lionel is not electrical. | neutral |
Neil is not big.
Sean is not funny.
Roy is electrical.
Baldwin is not electrical.
Neil is not important.
Melville is important.
Sean is not pleasant.
Baldwin is funny.
Melville is not funny.
Neil is not electrical.
Baldwin is not big.
Neil is not pleasant.If Melville is not funny and Roy is pleasant, then Neil is big and Melville is right, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is important, then Pierce is funny.
Someone is electrical and pleasant if and only if he is not funny and not big.
If there is someone who is not right, then Melville is not funny and Pierce is not pleasant.
Lionel being important implies that Lionel is pleasant.
All not right people are not important.
If someone is pleasant, then he is both not funny and not right.
If there is at least one people who is not big, then Lionel is not funny and Pierce is not important.
Someone who is not electrical is always both not important and not big.
If there is someone who is either not important or not funny, then Lionel is right.
Someone who is electrical is always not big.
If someone is not big, then he is pleasant, and vice versa. | Roy is not right. | entailment |
Neil is not big.
Sean is not funny.
Roy is electrical.
Baldwin is not electrical.
Neil is not important.
Melville is important.
Sean is not pleasant.
Baldwin is funny.
Melville is not funny.
Neil is not electrical.
Baldwin is not big.
Neil is not pleasant.If Melville is not funny and Roy is pleasant, then Neil is big and Melville is right, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is important, then Pierce is funny.
Someone is electrical and pleasant if and only if he is not funny and not big.
If there is someone who is not right, then Melville is not funny and Pierce is not pleasant.
Lionel being important implies that Lionel is pleasant.
All not right people are not important.
If someone is pleasant, then he is both not funny and not right.
If there is at least one people who is not big, then Lionel is not funny and Pierce is not important.
Someone who is not electrical is always both not important and not big.
If there is someone who is either not important or not funny, then Lionel is right.
Someone who is electrical is always not big.
If someone is not big, then he is pleasant, and vice versa. | Neil is big. | self_contradiction |
Neil is not big.
Sean is not funny.
Roy is electrical.
Baldwin is not electrical.
Neil is not important.
Melville is important.
Sean is not pleasant.
Baldwin is funny.
Melville is not funny.
Neil is not electrical.
Baldwin is not big.
Neil is not pleasant.If Melville is not funny and Roy is pleasant, then Neil is big and Melville is right, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is important, then Pierce is funny.
Someone is electrical and pleasant if and only if he is not funny and not big.
If there is someone who is not right, then Melville is not funny and Pierce is not pleasant.
Lionel being important implies that Lionel is pleasant.
All not right people are not important.
If someone is pleasant, then he is both not funny and not right.
If there is at least one people who is not big, then Lionel is not funny and Pierce is not important.
Someone who is not electrical is always both not important and not big.
If there is someone who is either not important or not funny, then Lionel is right.
Someone who is electrical is always not big.
If someone is not big, then he is pleasant, and vice versa. | Sean is pleasant. | contradiction |
Neil is not big.
Sean is not funny.
Roy is electrical.
Baldwin is not electrical.
Neil is not important.
Melville is important.
Sean is not pleasant.
Baldwin is funny.
Melville is not funny.
Neil is not electrical.
Baldwin is not big.
Neil is not pleasant.If Melville is not funny and Roy is pleasant, then Neil is big and Melville is right, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is important, then Pierce is funny.
Someone is electrical and pleasant if and only if he is not funny and not big.
If there is someone who is not right, then Melville is not funny and Pierce is not pleasant.
Lionel being important implies that Lionel is pleasant.
All not right people are not important.
If someone is pleasant, then he is both not funny and not right.
If there is at least one people who is not big, then Lionel is not funny and Pierce is not important.
Someone who is not electrical is always both not important and not big.
If there is someone who is either not important or not funny, then Lionel is right.
Someone who is electrical is always not big.
If someone is not big, then he is pleasant, and vice versa. | Roy is not important. | entailment |
Neil is not big.
Sean is not funny.
Roy is electrical.
Baldwin is not electrical.
Neil is not important.
Melville is important.
Sean is not pleasant.
Baldwin is funny.
Melville is not funny.
Neil is not electrical.
Baldwin is not big.
Neil is not pleasant.If Melville is not funny and Roy is pleasant, then Neil is big and Melville is right, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is important, then Pierce is funny.
Someone is electrical and pleasant if and only if he is not funny and not big.
If there is someone who is not right, then Melville is not funny and Pierce is not pleasant.
Lionel being important implies that Lionel is pleasant.
All not right people are not important.
If someone is pleasant, then he is both not funny and not right.
If there is at least one people who is not big, then Lionel is not funny and Pierce is not important.
Someone who is not electrical is always both not important and not big.
If there is someone who is either not important or not funny, then Lionel is right.
Someone who is electrical is always not big.
If someone is not big, then he is pleasant, and vice versa. | Pierce is not important. | entailment |
Neil is not big.
Sean is not funny.
Roy is electrical.
Baldwin is not electrical.
Neil is not important.
Melville is important.
Sean is not pleasant.
Baldwin is funny.
Melville is not funny.
Neil is not electrical.
Baldwin is not big.
Neil is not pleasant.If Melville is not funny and Roy is pleasant, then Neil is big and Melville is right, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is important, then Pierce is funny.
Someone is electrical and pleasant if and only if he is not funny and not big.
If there is someone who is not right, then Melville is not funny and Pierce is not pleasant.
Lionel being important implies that Lionel is pleasant.
All not right people are not important.
If someone is pleasant, then he is both not funny and not right.
If there is at least one people who is not big, then Lionel is not funny and Pierce is not important.
Someone who is not electrical is always both not important and not big.
If there is someone who is either not important or not funny, then Lionel is right.
Someone who is electrical is always not big.
If someone is not big, then he is pleasant, and vice versa. | Baldwin is pleasant. | entailment |
Neil is not big.
Sean is not funny.
Roy is electrical.
Baldwin is not electrical.
Neil is not important.
Melville is important.
Sean is not pleasant.
Baldwin is funny.
Melville is not funny.
Neil is not electrical.
Baldwin is not big.
Neil is not pleasant.If Melville is not funny and Roy is pleasant, then Neil is big and Melville is right, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is important, then Pierce is funny.
Someone is electrical and pleasant if and only if he is not funny and not big.
If there is someone who is not right, then Melville is not funny and Pierce is not pleasant.
Lionel being important implies that Lionel is pleasant.
All not right people are not important.
If someone is pleasant, then he is both not funny and not right.
If there is at least one people who is not big, then Lionel is not funny and Pierce is not important.
Someone who is not electrical is always both not important and not big.
If there is someone who is either not important or not funny, then Lionel is right.
Someone who is electrical is always not big.
If someone is not big, then he is pleasant, and vice versa. | Sean is big. | neutral |
Leslie is dynamic.
Ryan is not large.
Bowen is funny.
Leslie is magnificent.
Marvin is terrible.
Roswell is not dynamic.
Marvin is not dynamic.
Bowen is embarrassed.
Jorge is embarrassed.
Jorge is not funny.
Marvin is not embarrassed.
Ryan is not dynamic.Ryan being not embarrassed implies that Ryan is funny and Leslie is not terrible.
Jorge being large implies that Leslie is not magnificent.
If all people are magnificent, then Ryan is funny and Bowen is large.
Someone who is eithor funny or not large is always not embarrassed.
Someone who is both terrible and not funny is always magnificent.
If there is someone who is not magnificent, then Roswell is not funny and Leslie is embarrassed.
Someone being both not terrible and dynamic is equivalent to being large and embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is both funny and not dynamic, then Roswell is not terrible.
If someone is magnificent, then he is both not terrible and embarrassed.
Someone being not dynamic is equivalent to being not large.
Someone who is both not magnificent and funny is always not large.
Someone is not embarrassed and funny if and only if he is dynamic and not magnificent. | Leslie is dynamic. | entailment |
Leslie is dynamic.
Ryan is not large.
Bowen is funny.
Leslie is magnificent.
Marvin is terrible.
Roswell is not dynamic.
Marvin is not dynamic.
Bowen is embarrassed.
Jorge is embarrassed.
Jorge is not funny.
Marvin is not embarrassed.
Ryan is not dynamic.Ryan being not embarrassed implies that Ryan is funny and Leslie is not terrible.
Jorge being large implies that Leslie is not magnificent.
If all people are magnificent, then Ryan is funny and Bowen is large.
Someone who is eithor funny or not large is always not embarrassed.
Someone who is both terrible and not funny is always magnificent.
If there is someone who is not magnificent, then Roswell is not funny and Leslie is embarrassed.
Someone being both not terrible and dynamic is equivalent to being large and embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is both funny and not dynamic, then Roswell is not terrible.
If someone is magnificent, then he is both not terrible and embarrassed.
Someone being not dynamic is equivalent to being not large.
Someone who is both not magnificent and funny is always not large.
Someone is not embarrassed and funny if and only if he is dynamic and not magnificent. | Marvin is embarrassed. | contradiction |
Leslie is dynamic.
Ryan is not large.
Bowen is funny.
Leslie is magnificent.
Marvin is terrible.
Roswell is not dynamic.
Marvin is not dynamic.
Bowen is embarrassed.
Jorge is embarrassed.
Jorge is not funny.
Marvin is not embarrassed.
Ryan is not dynamic.Ryan being not embarrassed implies that Ryan is funny and Leslie is not terrible.
Jorge being large implies that Leslie is not magnificent.
If all people are magnificent, then Ryan is funny and Bowen is large.
Someone who is eithor funny or not large is always not embarrassed.
Someone who is both terrible and not funny is always magnificent.
If there is someone who is not magnificent, then Roswell is not funny and Leslie is embarrassed.
Someone being both not terrible and dynamic is equivalent to being large and embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is both funny and not dynamic, then Roswell is not terrible.
If someone is magnificent, then he is both not terrible and embarrassed.
Someone being not dynamic is equivalent to being not large.
Someone who is both not magnificent and funny is always not large.
Someone is not embarrassed and funny if and only if he is dynamic and not magnificent. | Laurence is not magnificent. | neutral |
Leslie is dynamic.
Ryan is not large.
Bowen is funny.
Leslie is magnificent.
Marvin is terrible.
Roswell is not dynamic.
Marvin is not dynamic.
Bowen is embarrassed.
Jorge is embarrassed.
Jorge is not funny.
Marvin is not embarrassed.
Ryan is not dynamic.Ryan being not embarrassed implies that Ryan is funny and Leslie is not terrible.
Jorge being large implies that Leslie is not magnificent.
If all people are magnificent, then Ryan is funny and Bowen is large.
Someone who is eithor funny or not large is always not embarrassed.
Someone who is both terrible and not funny is always magnificent.
If there is someone who is not magnificent, then Roswell is not funny and Leslie is embarrassed.
Someone being both not terrible and dynamic is equivalent to being large and embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is both funny and not dynamic, then Roswell is not terrible.
If someone is magnificent, then he is both not terrible and embarrassed.
Someone being not dynamic is equivalent to being not large.
Someone who is both not magnificent and funny is always not large.
Someone is not embarrassed and funny if and only if he is dynamic and not magnificent. | Ryan is dynamic. | self_contradiction |
Leslie is dynamic.
Ryan is not large.
Bowen is funny.
Leslie is magnificent.
Marvin is terrible.
Roswell is not dynamic.
Marvin is not dynamic.
Bowen is embarrassed.
Jorge is embarrassed.
Jorge is not funny.
Marvin is not embarrassed.
Ryan is not dynamic.Ryan being not embarrassed implies that Ryan is funny and Leslie is not terrible.
Jorge being large implies that Leslie is not magnificent.
If all people are magnificent, then Ryan is funny and Bowen is large.
Someone who is eithor funny or not large is always not embarrassed.
Someone who is both terrible and not funny is always magnificent.
If there is someone who is not magnificent, then Roswell is not funny and Leslie is embarrassed.
Someone being both not terrible and dynamic is equivalent to being large and embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is both funny and not dynamic, then Roswell is not terrible.
If someone is magnificent, then he is both not terrible and embarrassed.
Someone being not dynamic is equivalent to being not large.
Someone who is both not magnificent and funny is always not large.
Someone is not embarrassed and funny if and only if he is dynamic and not magnificent. | Ryan is large. | contradiction |
Leslie is dynamic.
Ryan is not large.
Bowen is funny.
Leslie is magnificent.
Marvin is terrible.
Roswell is not dynamic.
Marvin is not dynamic.
Bowen is embarrassed.
Jorge is embarrassed.
Jorge is not funny.
Marvin is not embarrassed.
Ryan is not dynamic.Ryan being not embarrassed implies that Ryan is funny and Leslie is not terrible.
Jorge being large implies that Leslie is not magnificent.
If all people are magnificent, then Ryan is funny and Bowen is large.
Someone who is eithor funny or not large is always not embarrassed.
Someone who is both terrible and not funny is always magnificent.
If there is someone who is not magnificent, then Roswell is not funny and Leslie is embarrassed.
Someone being both not terrible and dynamic is equivalent to being large and embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is both funny and not dynamic, then Roswell is not terrible.
If someone is magnificent, then he is both not terrible and embarrassed.
Someone being not dynamic is equivalent to being not large.
Someone who is both not magnificent and funny is always not large.
Someone is not embarrassed and funny if and only if he is dynamic and not magnificent. | Roswell is embarrassed. | contradiction |
Leslie is dynamic.
Ryan is not large.
Bowen is funny.
Leslie is magnificent.
Marvin is terrible.
Roswell is not dynamic.
Marvin is not dynamic.
Bowen is embarrassed.
Jorge is embarrassed.
Jorge is not funny.
Marvin is not embarrassed.
Ryan is not dynamic.Ryan being not embarrassed implies that Ryan is funny and Leslie is not terrible.
Jorge being large implies that Leslie is not magnificent.
If all people are magnificent, then Ryan is funny and Bowen is large.
Someone who is eithor funny or not large is always not embarrassed.
Someone who is both terrible and not funny is always magnificent.
If there is someone who is not magnificent, then Roswell is not funny and Leslie is embarrassed.
Someone being both not terrible and dynamic is equivalent to being large and embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is both funny and not dynamic, then Roswell is not terrible.
If someone is magnificent, then he is both not terrible and embarrassed.
Someone being not dynamic is equivalent to being not large.
Someone who is both not magnificent and funny is always not large.
Someone is not embarrassed and funny if and only if he is dynamic and not magnificent. | Ryan is not dynamic. | self_contradiction |
Leslie is dynamic.
Ryan is not large.
Bowen is funny.
Leslie is magnificent.
Marvin is terrible.
Roswell is not dynamic.
Marvin is not dynamic.
Bowen is embarrassed.
Jorge is embarrassed.
Jorge is not funny.
Marvin is not embarrassed.
Ryan is not dynamic.Ryan being not embarrassed implies that Ryan is funny and Leslie is not terrible.
Jorge being large implies that Leslie is not magnificent.
If all people are magnificent, then Ryan is funny and Bowen is large.
Someone who is eithor funny or not large is always not embarrassed.
Someone who is both terrible and not funny is always magnificent.
If there is someone who is not magnificent, then Roswell is not funny and Leslie is embarrassed.
Someone being both not terrible and dynamic is equivalent to being large and embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is both funny and not dynamic, then Roswell is not terrible.
If someone is magnificent, then he is both not terrible and embarrassed.
Someone being not dynamic is equivalent to being not large.
Someone who is both not magnificent and funny is always not large.
Someone is not embarrassed and funny if and only if he is dynamic and not magnificent. | Marvin is not embarrassed. | entailment |
Leslie is dynamic.
Ryan is not large.
Bowen is funny.
Leslie is magnificent.
Marvin is terrible.
Roswell is not dynamic.
Marvin is not dynamic.
Bowen is embarrassed.
Jorge is embarrassed.
Jorge is not funny.
Marvin is not embarrassed.
Ryan is not dynamic.Ryan being not embarrassed implies that Ryan is funny and Leslie is not terrible.
Jorge being large implies that Leslie is not magnificent.
If all people are magnificent, then Ryan is funny and Bowen is large.
Someone who is eithor funny or not large is always not embarrassed.
Someone who is both terrible and not funny is always magnificent.
If there is someone who is not magnificent, then Roswell is not funny and Leslie is embarrassed.
Someone being both not terrible and dynamic is equivalent to being large and embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is both funny and not dynamic, then Roswell is not terrible.
If someone is magnificent, then he is both not terrible and embarrassed.
Someone being not dynamic is equivalent to being not large.
Someone who is both not magnificent and funny is always not large.
Someone is not embarrassed and funny if and only if he is dynamic and not magnificent. | Bowen is not large. | entailment |
Leslie is dynamic.
Ryan is not large.
Bowen is funny.
Leslie is magnificent.
Marvin is terrible.
Roswell is not dynamic.
Marvin is not dynamic.
Bowen is embarrassed.
Jorge is embarrassed.
Jorge is not funny.
Marvin is not embarrassed.
Ryan is not dynamic.Ryan being not embarrassed implies that Ryan is funny and Leslie is not terrible.
Jorge being large implies that Leslie is not magnificent.
If all people are magnificent, then Ryan is funny and Bowen is large.
Someone who is eithor funny or not large is always not embarrassed.
Someone who is both terrible and not funny is always magnificent.
If there is someone who is not magnificent, then Roswell is not funny and Leslie is embarrassed.
Someone being both not terrible and dynamic is equivalent to being large and embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is both funny and not dynamic, then Roswell is not terrible.
If someone is magnificent, then he is both not terrible and embarrassed.
Someone being not dynamic is equivalent to being not large.
Someone who is both not magnificent and funny is always not large.
Someone is not embarrassed and funny if and only if he is dynamic and not magnificent. | Bowen is not dynamic. | self_contradiction |
Leslie is dynamic.
Ryan is not large.
Bowen is funny.
Leslie is magnificent.
Marvin is terrible.
Roswell is not dynamic.
Marvin is not dynamic.
Bowen is embarrassed.
Jorge is embarrassed.
Jorge is not funny.
Marvin is not embarrassed.
Ryan is not dynamic.Ryan being not embarrassed implies that Ryan is funny and Leslie is not terrible.
Jorge being large implies that Leslie is not magnificent.
If all people are magnificent, then Ryan is funny and Bowen is large.
Someone who is eithor funny or not large is always not embarrassed.
Someone who is both terrible and not funny is always magnificent.
If there is someone who is not magnificent, then Roswell is not funny and Leslie is embarrassed.
Someone being both not terrible and dynamic is equivalent to being large and embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is both funny and not dynamic, then Roswell is not terrible.
If someone is magnificent, then he is both not terrible and embarrassed.
Someone being not dynamic is equivalent to being not large.
Someone who is both not magnificent and funny is always not large.
Someone is not embarrassed and funny if and only if he is dynamic and not magnificent. | Bowen is not embarrassed. | self_contradiction |
Leslie is dynamic.
Ryan is not large.
Bowen is funny.
Leslie is magnificent.
Marvin is terrible.
Roswell is not dynamic.
Marvin is not dynamic.
Bowen is embarrassed.
Jorge is embarrassed.
Jorge is not funny.
Marvin is not embarrassed.
Ryan is not dynamic.Ryan being not embarrassed implies that Ryan is funny and Leslie is not terrible.
Jorge being large implies that Leslie is not magnificent.
If all people are magnificent, then Ryan is funny and Bowen is large.
Someone who is eithor funny or not large is always not embarrassed.
Someone who is both terrible and not funny is always magnificent.
If there is someone who is not magnificent, then Roswell is not funny and Leslie is embarrassed.
Someone being both not terrible and dynamic is equivalent to being large and embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is both funny and not dynamic, then Roswell is not terrible.
If someone is magnificent, then he is both not terrible and embarrassed.
Someone being not dynamic is equivalent to being not large.
Someone who is both not magnificent and funny is always not large.
Someone is not embarrassed and funny if and only if he is dynamic and not magnificent. | Leslie is not magnificent. | contradiction |
Leslie is dynamic.
Ryan is not large.
Bowen is funny.
Leslie is magnificent.
Marvin is terrible.
Roswell is not dynamic.
Marvin is not dynamic.
Bowen is embarrassed.
Jorge is embarrassed.
Jorge is not funny.
Marvin is not embarrassed.
Ryan is not dynamic.Ryan being not embarrassed implies that Ryan is funny and Leslie is not terrible.
Jorge being large implies that Leslie is not magnificent.
If all people are magnificent, then Ryan is funny and Bowen is large.
Someone who is eithor funny or not large is always not embarrassed.
Someone who is both terrible and not funny is always magnificent.
If there is someone who is not magnificent, then Roswell is not funny and Leslie is embarrassed.
Someone being both not terrible and dynamic is equivalent to being large and embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is both funny and not dynamic, then Roswell is not terrible.
If someone is magnificent, then he is both not terrible and embarrassed.
Someone being not dynamic is equivalent to being not large.
Someone who is both not magnificent and funny is always not large.
Someone is not embarrassed and funny if and only if he is dynamic and not magnificent. | Jorge is funny. | contradiction |
Leslie is dynamic.
Ryan is not large.
Bowen is funny.
Leslie is magnificent.
Marvin is terrible.
Roswell is not dynamic.
Marvin is not dynamic.
Bowen is embarrassed.
Jorge is embarrassed.
Jorge is not funny.
Marvin is not embarrassed.
Ryan is not dynamic.Ryan being not embarrassed implies that Ryan is funny and Leslie is not terrible.
Jorge being large implies that Leslie is not magnificent.
If all people are magnificent, then Ryan is funny and Bowen is large.
Someone who is eithor funny or not large is always not embarrassed.
Someone who is both terrible and not funny is always magnificent.
If there is someone who is not magnificent, then Roswell is not funny and Leslie is embarrassed.
Someone being both not terrible and dynamic is equivalent to being large and embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is both funny and not dynamic, then Roswell is not terrible.
If someone is magnificent, then he is both not terrible and embarrassed.
Someone being not dynamic is equivalent to being not large.
Someone who is both not magnificent and funny is always not large.
Someone is not embarrassed and funny if and only if he is dynamic and not magnificent. | Jorge is magnificent. | neutral |
Leslie is dynamic.
Ryan is not large.
Bowen is funny.
Leslie is magnificent.
Marvin is terrible.
Roswell is not dynamic.
Marvin is not dynamic.
Bowen is embarrassed.
Jorge is embarrassed.
Jorge is not funny.
Marvin is not embarrassed.
Ryan is not dynamic.Ryan being not embarrassed implies that Ryan is funny and Leslie is not terrible.
Jorge being large implies that Leslie is not magnificent.
If all people are magnificent, then Ryan is funny and Bowen is large.
Someone who is eithor funny or not large is always not embarrassed.
Someone who is both terrible and not funny is always magnificent.
If there is someone who is not magnificent, then Roswell is not funny and Leslie is embarrassed.
Someone being both not terrible and dynamic is equivalent to being large and embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is both funny and not dynamic, then Roswell is not terrible.
If someone is magnificent, then he is both not terrible and embarrassed.
Someone being not dynamic is equivalent to being not large.
Someone who is both not magnificent and funny is always not large.
Someone is not embarrassed and funny if and only if he is dynamic and not magnificent. | Marvin is magnificent. | neutral |
Leslie is dynamic.
Ryan is not large.
Bowen is funny.
Leslie is magnificent.
Marvin is terrible.
Roswell is not dynamic.
Marvin is not dynamic.
Bowen is embarrassed.
Jorge is embarrassed.
Jorge is not funny.
Marvin is not embarrassed.
Ryan is not dynamic.Ryan being not embarrassed implies that Ryan is funny and Leslie is not terrible.
Jorge being large implies that Leslie is not magnificent.
If all people are magnificent, then Ryan is funny and Bowen is large.
Someone who is eithor funny or not large is always not embarrassed.
Someone who is both terrible and not funny is always magnificent.
If there is someone who is not magnificent, then Roswell is not funny and Leslie is embarrassed.
Someone being both not terrible and dynamic is equivalent to being large and embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is both funny and not dynamic, then Roswell is not terrible.
If someone is magnificent, then he is both not terrible and embarrassed.
Someone being not dynamic is equivalent to being not large.
Someone who is both not magnificent and funny is always not large.
Someone is not embarrassed and funny if and only if he is dynamic and not magnificent. | Jorge is dynamic. | neutral |
Leslie is dynamic.
Ryan is not large.
Bowen is funny.
Leslie is magnificent.
Marvin is terrible.
Roswell is not dynamic.
Marvin is not dynamic.
Bowen is embarrassed.
Jorge is embarrassed.
Jorge is not funny.
Marvin is not embarrassed.
Ryan is not dynamic.Ryan being not embarrassed implies that Ryan is funny and Leslie is not terrible.
Jorge being large implies that Leslie is not magnificent.
If all people are magnificent, then Ryan is funny and Bowen is large.
Someone who is eithor funny or not large is always not embarrassed.
Someone who is both terrible and not funny is always magnificent.
If there is someone who is not magnificent, then Roswell is not funny and Leslie is embarrassed.
Someone being both not terrible and dynamic is equivalent to being large and embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is both funny and not dynamic, then Roswell is not terrible.
If someone is magnificent, then he is both not terrible and embarrassed.
Someone being not dynamic is equivalent to being not large.
Someone who is both not magnificent and funny is always not large.
Someone is not embarrassed and funny if and only if he is dynamic and not magnificent. | Bowen is embarrassed. | self_contradiction |
Leslie is dynamic.
Ryan is not large.
Bowen is funny.
Leslie is magnificent.
Marvin is terrible.
Roswell is not dynamic.
Marvin is not dynamic.
Bowen is embarrassed.
Jorge is embarrassed.
Jorge is not funny.
Marvin is not embarrassed.
Ryan is not dynamic.Ryan being not embarrassed implies that Ryan is funny and Leslie is not terrible.
Jorge being large implies that Leslie is not magnificent.
If all people are magnificent, then Ryan is funny and Bowen is large.
Someone who is eithor funny or not large is always not embarrassed.
Someone who is both terrible and not funny is always magnificent.
If there is someone who is not magnificent, then Roswell is not funny and Leslie is embarrassed.
Someone being both not terrible and dynamic is equivalent to being large and embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is both funny and not dynamic, then Roswell is not terrible.
If someone is magnificent, then he is both not terrible and embarrassed.
Someone being not dynamic is equivalent to being not large.
Someone who is both not magnificent and funny is always not large.
Someone is not embarrassed and funny if and only if he is dynamic and not magnificent. | Bowen is terrible. | neutral |
Leslie is dynamic.
Ryan is not large.
Bowen is funny.
Leslie is magnificent.
Marvin is terrible.
Roswell is not dynamic.
Marvin is not dynamic.
Bowen is embarrassed.
Jorge is embarrassed.
Jorge is not funny.
Marvin is not embarrassed.
Ryan is not dynamic.Ryan being not embarrassed implies that Ryan is funny and Leslie is not terrible.
Jorge being large implies that Leslie is not magnificent.
If all people are magnificent, then Ryan is funny and Bowen is large.
Someone who is eithor funny or not large is always not embarrassed.
Someone who is both terrible and not funny is always magnificent.
If there is someone who is not magnificent, then Roswell is not funny and Leslie is embarrassed.
Someone being both not terrible and dynamic is equivalent to being large and embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is both funny and not dynamic, then Roswell is not terrible.
If someone is magnificent, then he is both not terrible and embarrassed.
Someone being not dynamic is equivalent to being not large.
Someone who is both not magnificent and funny is always not large.
Someone is not embarrassed and funny if and only if he is dynamic and not magnificent. | Ryan is not large. | entailment |
Leslie is dynamic.
Ryan is not large.
Bowen is funny.
Leslie is magnificent.
Marvin is terrible.
Roswell is not dynamic.
Marvin is not dynamic.
Bowen is embarrassed.
Jorge is embarrassed.
Jorge is not funny.
Marvin is not embarrassed.
Ryan is not dynamic.Ryan being not embarrassed implies that Ryan is funny and Leslie is not terrible.
Jorge being large implies that Leslie is not magnificent.
If all people are magnificent, then Ryan is funny and Bowen is large.
Someone who is eithor funny or not large is always not embarrassed.
Someone who is both terrible and not funny is always magnificent.
If there is someone who is not magnificent, then Roswell is not funny and Leslie is embarrassed.
Someone being both not terrible and dynamic is equivalent to being large and embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is both funny and not dynamic, then Roswell is not terrible.
If someone is magnificent, then he is both not terrible and embarrassed.
Someone being not dynamic is equivalent to being not large.
Someone who is both not magnificent and funny is always not large.
Someone is not embarrassed and funny if and only if he is dynamic and not magnificent. | Roswell is not dynamic. | entailment |
Hunter is not intellectual.
Chester is better.
Chester is intellectual.
Orlando is modern.
Chester is not concerned.
Mila is not better.
Mila is intellectual.
Stella is modern.
Alfred is not modern.
Hunter is famous.
Orlando is not basic.
Alfred is not concerned.Someone being both not famous and not better is equivalent to being not concerned.
As long as someone is modern and concerned, he is better and famous.
If all people are not basic, then Marlon is not concerned and Mila is not better.
Chester being better or Mila being not concerned implies that Orlando is modern.
If there is at least one people who is not intellectual or not famous, then Stella is basic.
If there is someone who is both not concerned and better, then Alfred is not basic.
If there is someone who is modern, then Stella is not concerned.
If someone is not concerned and basic, then he is both modern and better, and vice versa.
Someone who is famous is always both not intellectual and not concerned.
Someone is modern and not concerned if and only if he is intellectual and better.
Stella being not concerned and Marlon being modern imply that Chester is not intellectual.
If there is someone who is modern, then Orlando is not intellectual. | Stella is not famous. | entailment |
Hunter is not intellectual.
Chester is better.
Chester is intellectual.
Orlando is modern.
Chester is not concerned.
Mila is not better.
Mila is intellectual.
Stella is modern.
Alfred is not modern.
Hunter is famous.
Orlando is not basic.
Alfred is not concerned.Someone being both not famous and not better is equivalent to being not concerned.
As long as someone is modern and concerned, he is better and famous.
If all people are not basic, then Marlon is not concerned and Mila is not better.
Chester being better or Mila being not concerned implies that Orlando is modern.
If there is at least one people who is not intellectual or not famous, then Stella is basic.
If there is someone who is both not concerned and better, then Alfred is not basic.
If there is someone who is modern, then Stella is not concerned.
If someone is not concerned and basic, then he is both modern and better, and vice versa.
Someone who is famous is always both not intellectual and not concerned.
Someone is modern and not concerned if and only if he is intellectual and better.
Stella being not concerned and Marlon being modern imply that Chester is not intellectual.
If there is someone who is modern, then Orlando is not intellectual. | Chester is basic. | entailment |
Hunter is not intellectual.
Chester is better.
Chester is intellectual.
Orlando is modern.
Chester is not concerned.
Mila is not better.
Mila is intellectual.
Stella is modern.
Alfred is not modern.
Hunter is famous.
Orlando is not basic.
Alfred is not concerned.Someone being both not famous and not better is equivalent to being not concerned.
As long as someone is modern and concerned, he is better and famous.
If all people are not basic, then Marlon is not concerned and Mila is not better.
Chester being better or Mila being not concerned implies that Orlando is modern.
If there is at least one people who is not intellectual or not famous, then Stella is basic.
If there is someone who is both not concerned and better, then Alfred is not basic.
If there is someone who is modern, then Stella is not concerned.
If someone is not concerned and basic, then he is both modern and better, and vice versa.
Someone who is famous is always both not intellectual and not concerned.
Someone is modern and not concerned if and only if he is intellectual and better.
Stella being not concerned and Marlon being modern imply that Chester is not intellectual.
If there is someone who is modern, then Orlando is not intellectual. | Chester is not better. | self_contradiction |
Hunter is not intellectual.
Chester is better.
Chester is intellectual.
Orlando is modern.
Chester is not concerned.
Mila is not better.
Mila is intellectual.
Stella is modern.
Alfred is not modern.
Hunter is famous.
Orlando is not basic.
Alfred is not concerned.Someone being both not famous and not better is equivalent to being not concerned.
As long as someone is modern and concerned, he is better and famous.
If all people are not basic, then Marlon is not concerned and Mila is not better.
Chester being better or Mila being not concerned implies that Orlando is modern.
If there is at least one people who is not intellectual or not famous, then Stella is basic.
If there is someone who is both not concerned and better, then Alfred is not basic.
If there is someone who is modern, then Stella is not concerned.
If someone is not concerned and basic, then he is both modern and better, and vice versa.
Someone who is famous is always both not intellectual and not concerned.
Someone is modern and not concerned if and only if he is intellectual and better.
Stella being not concerned and Marlon being modern imply that Chester is not intellectual.
If there is someone who is modern, then Orlando is not intellectual. | Orlando is modern. | entailment |
Hunter is not intellectual.
Chester is better.
Chester is intellectual.
Orlando is modern.
Chester is not concerned.
Mila is not better.
Mila is intellectual.
Stella is modern.
Alfred is not modern.
Hunter is famous.
Orlando is not basic.
Alfred is not concerned.Someone being both not famous and not better is equivalent to being not concerned.
As long as someone is modern and concerned, he is better and famous.
If all people are not basic, then Marlon is not concerned and Mila is not better.
Chester being better or Mila being not concerned implies that Orlando is modern.
If there is at least one people who is not intellectual or not famous, then Stella is basic.
If there is someone who is both not concerned and better, then Alfred is not basic.
If there is someone who is modern, then Stella is not concerned.
If someone is not concerned and basic, then he is both modern and better, and vice versa.
Someone who is famous is always both not intellectual and not concerned.
Someone is modern and not concerned if and only if he is intellectual and better.
Stella being not concerned and Marlon being modern imply that Chester is not intellectual.
If there is someone who is modern, then Orlando is not intellectual. | Orlando is famous. | neutral |
Hunter is not intellectual.
Chester is better.
Chester is intellectual.
Orlando is modern.
Chester is not concerned.
Mila is not better.
Mila is intellectual.
Stella is modern.
Alfred is not modern.
Hunter is famous.
Orlando is not basic.
Alfred is not concerned.Someone being both not famous and not better is equivalent to being not concerned.
As long as someone is modern and concerned, he is better and famous.
If all people are not basic, then Marlon is not concerned and Mila is not better.
Chester being better or Mila being not concerned implies that Orlando is modern.
If there is at least one people who is not intellectual or not famous, then Stella is basic.
If there is someone who is both not concerned and better, then Alfred is not basic.
If there is someone who is modern, then Stella is not concerned.
If someone is not concerned and basic, then he is both modern and better, and vice versa.
Someone who is famous is always both not intellectual and not concerned.
Someone is modern and not concerned if and only if he is intellectual and better.
Stella being not concerned and Marlon being modern imply that Chester is not intellectual.
If there is someone who is modern, then Orlando is not intellectual. | Hunter is famous. | self_contradiction |
Hunter is not intellectual.
Chester is better.
Chester is intellectual.
Orlando is modern.
Chester is not concerned.
Mila is not better.
Mila is intellectual.
Stella is modern.
Alfred is not modern.
Hunter is famous.
Orlando is not basic.
Alfred is not concerned.Someone being both not famous and not better is equivalent to being not concerned.
As long as someone is modern and concerned, he is better and famous.
If all people are not basic, then Marlon is not concerned and Mila is not better.
Chester being better or Mila being not concerned implies that Orlando is modern.
If there is at least one people who is not intellectual or not famous, then Stella is basic.
If there is someone who is both not concerned and better, then Alfred is not basic.
If there is someone who is modern, then Stella is not concerned.
If someone is not concerned and basic, then he is both modern and better, and vice versa.
Someone who is famous is always both not intellectual and not concerned.
Someone is modern and not concerned if and only if he is intellectual and better.
Stella being not concerned and Marlon being modern imply that Chester is not intellectual.
If there is someone who is modern, then Orlando is not intellectual. | Orlando is not modern. | contradiction |
Hunter is not intellectual.
Chester is better.
Chester is intellectual.
Orlando is modern.
Chester is not concerned.
Mila is not better.
Mila is intellectual.
Stella is modern.
Alfred is not modern.
Hunter is famous.
Orlando is not basic.
Alfred is not concerned.Someone being both not famous and not better is equivalent to being not concerned.
As long as someone is modern and concerned, he is better and famous.
If all people are not basic, then Marlon is not concerned and Mila is not better.
Chester being better or Mila being not concerned implies that Orlando is modern.
If there is at least one people who is not intellectual or not famous, then Stella is basic.
If there is someone who is both not concerned and better, then Alfred is not basic.
If there is someone who is modern, then Stella is not concerned.
If someone is not concerned and basic, then he is both modern and better, and vice versa.
Someone who is famous is always both not intellectual and not concerned.
Someone is modern and not concerned if and only if he is intellectual and better.
Stella being not concerned and Marlon being modern imply that Chester is not intellectual.
If there is someone who is modern, then Orlando is not intellectual. | Marlon is not concerned. | neutral |
Hunter is not intellectual.
Chester is better.
Chester is intellectual.
Orlando is modern.
Chester is not concerned.
Mila is not better.
Mila is intellectual.
Stella is modern.
Alfred is not modern.
Hunter is famous.
Orlando is not basic.
Alfred is not concerned.Someone being both not famous and not better is equivalent to being not concerned.
As long as someone is modern and concerned, he is better and famous.
If all people are not basic, then Marlon is not concerned and Mila is not better.
Chester being better or Mila being not concerned implies that Orlando is modern.
If there is at least one people who is not intellectual or not famous, then Stella is basic.
If there is someone who is both not concerned and better, then Alfred is not basic.
If there is someone who is modern, then Stella is not concerned.
If someone is not concerned and basic, then he is both modern and better, and vice versa.
Someone who is famous is always both not intellectual and not concerned.
Someone is modern and not concerned if and only if he is intellectual and better.
Stella being not concerned and Marlon being modern imply that Chester is not intellectual.
If there is someone who is modern, then Orlando is not intellectual. | Stella is famous. | contradiction |
Hunter is not intellectual.
Chester is better.
Chester is intellectual.
Orlando is modern.
Chester is not concerned.
Mila is not better.
Mila is intellectual.
Stella is modern.
Alfred is not modern.
Hunter is famous.
Orlando is not basic.
Alfred is not concerned.Someone being both not famous and not better is equivalent to being not concerned.
As long as someone is modern and concerned, he is better and famous.
If all people are not basic, then Marlon is not concerned and Mila is not better.
Chester being better or Mila being not concerned implies that Orlando is modern.
If there is at least one people who is not intellectual or not famous, then Stella is basic.
If there is someone who is both not concerned and better, then Alfred is not basic.
If there is someone who is modern, then Stella is not concerned.
If someone is not concerned and basic, then he is both modern and better, and vice versa.
Someone who is famous is always both not intellectual and not concerned.
Someone is modern and not concerned if and only if he is intellectual and better.
Stella being not concerned and Marlon being modern imply that Chester is not intellectual.
If there is someone who is modern, then Orlando is not intellectual. | Stella is not better. | self_contradiction |
Hunter is not intellectual.
Chester is better.
Chester is intellectual.
Orlando is modern.
Chester is not concerned.
Mila is not better.
Mila is intellectual.
Stella is modern.
Alfred is not modern.
Hunter is famous.
Orlando is not basic.
Alfred is not concerned.Someone being both not famous and not better is equivalent to being not concerned.
As long as someone is modern and concerned, he is better and famous.
If all people are not basic, then Marlon is not concerned and Mila is not better.
Chester being better or Mila being not concerned implies that Orlando is modern.
If there is at least one people who is not intellectual or not famous, then Stella is basic.
If there is someone who is both not concerned and better, then Alfred is not basic.
If there is someone who is modern, then Stella is not concerned.
If someone is not concerned and basic, then he is both modern and better, and vice versa.
Someone who is famous is always both not intellectual and not concerned.
Someone is modern and not concerned if and only if he is intellectual and better.
Stella being not concerned and Marlon being modern imply that Chester is not intellectual.
If there is someone who is modern, then Orlando is not intellectual. | Alfred is concerned. | contradiction |
Hunter is not intellectual.
Chester is better.
Chester is intellectual.
Orlando is modern.
Chester is not concerned.
Mila is not better.
Mila is intellectual.
Stella is modern.
Alfred is not modern.
Hunter is famous.
Orlando is not basic.
Alfred is not concerned.Someone being both not famous and not better is equivalent to being not concerned.
As long as someone is modern and concerned, he is better and famous.
If all people are not basic, then Marlon is not concerned and Mila is not better.
Chester being better or Mila being not concerned implies that Orlando is modern.
If there is at least one people who is not intellectual or not famous, then Stella is basic.
If there is someone who is both not concerned and better, then Alfred is not basic.
If there is someone who is modern, then Stella is not concerned.
If someone is not concerned and basic, then he is both modern and better, and vice versa.
Someone who is famous is always both not intellectual and not concerned.
Someone is modern and not concerned if and only if he is intellectual and better.
Stella being not concerned and Marlon being modern imply that Chester is not intellectual.
If there is someone who is modern, then Orlando is not intellectual. | Marlon is famous. | neutral |
Hunter is not intellectual.
Chester is better.
Chester is intellectual.
Orlando is modern.
Chester is not concerned.
Mila is not better.
Mila is intellectual.
Stella is modern.
Alfred is not modern.
Hunter is famous.
Orlando is not basic.
Alfred is not concerned.Someone being both not famous and not better is equivalent to being not concerned.
As long as someone is modern and concerned, he is better and famous.
If all people are not basic, then Marlon is not concerned and Mila is not better.
Chester being better or Mila being not concerned implies that Orlando is modern.
If there is at least one people who is not intellectual or not famous, then Stella is basic.
If there is someone who is both not concerned and better, then Alfred is not basic.
If there is someone who is modern, then Stella is not concerned.
If someone is not concerned and basic, then he is both modern and better, and vice versa.
Someone who is famous is always both not intellectual and not concerned.
Someone is modern and not concerned if and only if he is intellectual and better.
Stella being not concerned and Marlon being modern imply that Chester is not intellectual.
If there is someone who is modern, then Orlando is not intellectual. | Stella is better. | self_contradiction |
Hunter is not intellectual.
Chester is better.
Chester is intellectual.
Orlando is modern.
Chester is not concerned.
Mila is not better.
Mila is intellectual.
Stella is modern.
Alfred is not modern.
Hunter is famous.
Orlando is not basic.
Alfred is not concerned.Someone being both not famous and not better is equivalent to being not concerned.
As long as someone is modern and concerned, he is better and famous.
If all people are not basic, then Marlon is not concerned and Mila is not better.
Chester being better or Mila being not concerned implies that Orlando is modern.
If there is at least one people who is not intellectual or not famous, then Stella is basic.
If there is someone who is both not concerned and better, then Alfred is not basic.
If there is someone who is modern, then Stella is not concerned.
If someone is not concerned and basic, then he is both modern and better, and vice versa.
Someone who is famous is always both not intellectual and not concerned.
Someone is modern and not concerned if and only if he is intellectual and better.
Stella being not concerned and Marlon being modern imply that Chester is not intellectual.
If there is someone who is modern, then Orlando is not intellectual. | Chester is better. | self_contradiction |
Hunter is not intellectual.
Chester is better.
Chester is intellectual.
Orlando is modern.
Chester is not concerned.
Mila is not better.
Mila is intellectual.
Stella is modern.
Alfred is not modern.
Hunter is famous.
Orlando is not basic.
Alfred is not concerned.Someone being both not famous and not better is equivalent to being not concerned.
As long as someone is modern and concerned, he is better and famous.
If all people are not basic, then Marlon is not concerned and Mila is not better.
Chester being better or Mila being not concerned implies that Orlando is modern.
If there is at least one people who is not intellectual or not famous, then Stella is basic.
If there is someone who is both not concerned and better, then Alfred is not basic.
If there is someone who is modern, then Stella is not concerned.
If someone is not concerned and basic, then he is both modern and better, and vice versa.
Someone who is famous is always both not intellectual and not concerned.
Someone is modern and not concerned if and only if he is intellectual and better.
Stella being not concerned and Marlon being modern imply that Chester is not intellectual.
If there is someone who is modern, then Orlando is not intellectual. | Mila is not modern. | neutral |
Hunter is not intellectual.
Chester is better.
Chester is intellectual.
Orlando is modern.
Chester is not concerned.
Mila is not better.
Mila is intellectual.
Stella is modern.
Alfred is not modern.
Hunter is famous.
Orlando is not basic.
Alfred is not concerned.Someone being both not famous and not better is equivalent to being not concerned.
As long as someone is modern and concerned, he is better and famous.
If all people are not basic, then Marlon is not concerned and Mila is not better.
Chester being better or Mila being not concerned implies that Orlando is modern.
If there is at least one people who is not intellectual or not famous, then Stella is basic.
If there is someone who is both not concerned and better, then Alfred is not basic.
If there is someone who is modern, then Stella is not concerned.
If someone is not concerned and basic, then he is both modern and better, and vice versa.
Someone who is famous is always both not intellectual and not concerned.
Someone is modern and not concerned if and only if he is intellectual and better.
Stella being not concerned and Marlon being modern imply that Chester is not intellectual.
If there is someone who is modern, then Orlando is not intellectual. | Stella is basic. | entailment |
Hunter is not intellectual.
Chester is better.
Chester is intellectual.
Orlando is modern.
Chester is not concerned.
Mila is not better.
Mila is intellectual.
Stella is modern.
Alfred is not modern.
Hunter is famous.
Orlando is not basic.
Alfred is not concerned.Someone being both not famous and not better is equivalent to being not concerned.
As long as someone is modern and concerned, he is better and famous.
If all people are not basic, then Marlon is not concerned and Mila is not better.
Chester being better or Mila being not concerned implies that Orlando is modern.
If there is at least one people who is not intellectual or not famous, then Stella is basic.
If there is someone who is both not concerned and better, then Alfred is not basic.
If there is someone who is modern, then Stella is not concerned.
If someone is not concerned and basic, then he is both modern and better, and vice versa.
Someone who is famous is always both not intellectual and not concerned.
Someone is modern and not concerned if and only if he is intellectual and better.
Stella being not concerned and Marlon being modern imply that Chester is not intellectual.
If there is someone who is modern, then Orlando is not intellectual. | Hunter is better. | contradiction |
Hunter is not intellectual.
Chester is better.
Chester is intellectual.
Orlando is modern.
Chester is not concerned.
Mila is not better.
Mila is intellectual.
Stella is modern.
Alfred is not modern.
Hunter is famous.
Orlando is not basic.
Alfred is not concerned.Someone being both not famous and not better is equivalent to being not concerned.
As long as someone is modern and concerned, he is better and famous.
If all people are not basic, then Marlon is not concerned and Mila is not better.
Chester being better or Mila being not concerned implies that Orlando is modern.
If there is at least one people who is not intellectual or not famous, then Stella is basic.
If there is someone who is both not concerned and better, then Alfred is not basic.
If there is someone who is modern, then Stella is not concerned.
If someone is not concerned and basic, then he is both modern and better, and vice versa.
Someone who is famous is always both not intellectual and not concerned.
Someone is modern and not concerned if and only if he is intellectual and better.
Stella being not concerned and Marlon being modern imply that Chester is not intellectual.
If there is someone who is modern, then Orlando is not intellectual. | Stella is concerned. | contradiction |
Hunter is not intellectual.
Chester is better.
Chester is intellectual.
Orlando is modern.
Chester is not concerned.
Mila is not better.
Mila is intellectual.
Stella is modern.
Alfred is not modern.
Hunter is famous.
Orlando is not basic.
Alfred is not concerned.Someone being both not famous and not better is equivalent to being not concerned.
As long as someone is modern and concerned, he is better and famous.
If all people are not basic, then Marlon is not concerned and Mila is not better.
Chester being better or Mila being not concerned implies that Orlando is modern.
If there is at least one people who is not intellectual or not famous, then Stella is basic.
If there is someone who is both not concerned and better, then Alfred is not basic.
If there is someone who is modern, then Stella is not concerned.
If someone is not concerned and basic, then he is both modern and better, and vice versa.
Someone who is famous is always both not intellectual and not concerned.
Someone is modern and not concerned if and only if he is intellectual and better.
Stella being not concerned and Marlon being modern imply that Chester is not intellectual.
If there is someone who is modern, then Orlando is not intellectual. | Alfred is not better. | entailment |
Hunter is not intellectual.
Chester is better.
Chester is intellectual.
Orlando is modern.
Chester is not concerned.
Mila is not better.
Mila is intellectual.
Stella is modern.
Alfred is not modern.
Hunter is famous.
Orlando is not basic.
Alfred is not concerned.Someone being both not famous and not better is equivalent to being not concerned.
As long as someone is modern and concerned, he is better and famous.
If all people are not basic, then Marlon is not concerned and Mila is not better.
Chester being better or Mila being not concerned implies that Orlando is modern.
If there is at least one people who is not intellectual or not famous, then Stella is basic.
If there is someone who is both not concerned and better, then Alfred is not basic.
If there is someone who is modern, then Stella is not concerned.
If someone is not concerned and basic, then he is both modern and better, and vice versa.
Someone who is famous is always both not intellectual and not concerned.
Someone is modern and not concerned if and only if he is intellectual and better.
Stella being not concerned and Marlon being modern imply that Chester is not intellectual.
If there is someone who is modern, then Orlando is not intellectual. | Marlon is not famous. | neutral |
Graham is not alive.
Martin is talented.
Lucia is mad.
Chrysta is talented.
Silvia is not automatic.
Lionel is alive.
Lionel is not talented.
Graham is gifted.
Chrysta is not alive.
Graham is not curious.
Everett is mad.
Everett is curious.If there is at least one people who is gifted, then Everett is automatic and Lucia is not curious.
If everyone is gifted, then Silvia is talented.
if there is at least one people who is not alive and mad, then Martin is not talented and Lionel is curious.
Someone who is not alive is always not gifted.
If someone is both not alive and curious, then he is not gifted.
If Graham is curious, then Martin is talented, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not mad, then Chrysta is talented.
If there is at least one people who is both not curious and alive, then Chrysta is automatic.
Someone is not mad if and only if he is gifted.
It can be concluded that Chrysta is gifted once knowing that Chrysta is alive.
Lucia being not curious is equivalent to Chrysta being talented and Lionel being not mad.
If someone is not alive or talented, then he is gifted. | Lionel is not alive. | contradiction |
Graham is not alive.
Martin is talented.
Lucia is mad.
Chrysta is talented.
Silvia is not automatic.
Lionel is alive.
Lionel is not talented.
Graham is gifted.
Chrysta is not alive.
Graham is not curious.
Everett is mad.
Everett is curious.If there is at least one people who is gifted, then Everett is automatic and Lucia is not curious.
If everyone is gifted, then Silvia is talented.
if there is at least one people who is not alive and mad, then Martin is not talented and Lionel is curious.
Someone who is not alive is always not gifted.
If someone is both not alive and curious, then he is not gifted.
If Graham is curious, then Martin is talented, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not mad, then Chrysta is talented.
If there is at least one people who is both not curious and alive, then Chrysta is automatic.
Someone is not mad if and only if he is gifted.
It can be concluded that Chrysta is gifted once knowing that Chrysta is alive.
Lucia being not curious is equivalent to Chrysta being talented and Lionel being not mad.
If someone is not alive or talented, then he is gifted. | Graham is not gifted. | self_contradiction |
Graham is not alive.
Martin is talented.
Lucia is mad.
Chrysta is talented.
Silvia is not automatic.
Lionel is alive.
Lionel is not talented.
Graham is gifted.
Chrysta is not alive.
Graham is not curious.
Everett is mad.
Everett is curious.If there is at least one people who is gifted, then Everett is automatic and Lucia is not curious.
If everyone is gifted, then Silvia is talented.
if there is at least one people who is not alive and mad, then Martin is not talented and Lionel is curious.
Someone who is not alive is always not gifted.
If someone is both not alive and curious, then he is not gifted.
If Graham is curious, then Martin is talented, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not mad, then Chrysta is talented.
If there is at least one people who is both not curious and alive, then Chrysta is automatic.
Someone is not mad if and only if he is gifted.
It can be concluded that Chrysta is gifted once knowing that Chrysta is alive.
Lucia being not curious is equivalent to Chrysta being talented and Lionel being not mad.
If someone is not alive or talented, then he is gifted. | Lionel is not mad. | entailment |
Graham is not alive.
Martin is talented.
Lucia is mad.
Chrysta is talented.
Silvia is not automatic.
Lionel is alive.
Lionel is not talented.
Graham is gifted.
Chrysta is not alive.
Graham is not curious.
Everett is mad.
Everett is curious.If there is at least one people who is gifted, then Everett is automatic and Lucia is not curious.
If everyone is gifted, then Silvia is talented.
if there is at least one people who is not alive and mad, then Martin is not talented and Lionel is curious.
Someone who is not alive is always not gifted.
If someone is both not alive and curious, then he is not gifted.
If Graham is curious, then Martin is talented, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not mad, then Chrysta is talented.
If there is at least one people who is both not curious and alive, then Chrysta is automatic.
Someone is not mad if and only if he is gifted.
It can be concluded that Chrysta is gifted once knowing that Chrysta is alive.
Lucia being not curious is equivalent to Chrysta being talented and Lionel being not mad.
If someone is not alive or talented, then he is gifted. | Graham is automatic. | neutral |
Graham is not alive.
Martin is talented.
Lucia is mad.
Chrysta is talented.
Silvia is not automatic.
Lionel is alive.
Lionel is not talented.
Graham is gifted.
Chrysta is not alive.
Graham is not curious.
Everett is mad.
Everett is curious.If there is at least one people who is gifted, then Everett is automatic and Lucia is not curious.
If everyone is gifted, then Silvia is talented.
if there is at least one people who is not alive and mad, then Martin is not talented and Lionel is curious.
Someone who is not alive is always not gifted.
If someone is both not alive and curious, then he is not gifted.
If Graham is curious, then Martin is talented, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not mad, then Chrysta is talented.
If there is at least one people who is both not curious and alive, then Chrysta is automatic.
Someone is not mad if and only if he is gifted.
It can be concluded that Chrysta is gifted once knowing that Chrysta is alive.
Lucia being not curious is equivalent to Chrysta being talented and Lionel being not mad.
If someone is not alive or talented, then he is gifted. | Chrysta is not gifted. | self_contradiction |
Graham is not alive.
Martin is talented.
Lucia is mad.
Chrysta is talented.
Silvia is not automatic.
Lionel is alive.
Lionel is not talented.
Graham is gifted.
Chrysta is not alive.
Graham is not curious.
Everett is mad.
Everett is curious.If there is at least one people who is gifted, then Everett is automatic and Lucia is not curious.
If everyone is gifted, then Silvia is talented.
if there is at least one people who is not alive and mad, then Martin is not talented and Lionel is curious.
Someone who is not alive is always not gifted.
If someone is both not alive and curious, then he is not gifted.
If Graham is curious, then Martin is talented, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not mad, then Chrysta is talented.
If there is at least one people who is both not curious and alive, then Chrysta is automatic.
Someone is not mad if and only if he is gifted.
It can be concluded that Chrysta is gifted once knowing that Chrysta is alive.
Lucia being not curious is equivalent to Chrysta being talented and Lionel being not mad.
If someone is not alive or talented, then he is gifted. | Everett is not automatic. | contradiction |
Graham is not alive.
Martin is talented.
Lucia is mad.
Chrysta is talented.
Silvia is not automatic.
Lionel is alive.
Lionel is not talented.
Graham is gifted.
Chrysta is not alive.
Graham is not curious.
Everett is mad.
Everett is curious.If there is at least one people who is gifted, then Everett is automatic and Lucia is not curious.
If everyone is gifted, then Silvia is talented.
if there is at least one people who is not alive and mad, then Martin is not talented and Lionel is curious.
Someone who is not alive is always not gifted.
If someone is both not alive and curious, then he is not gifted.
If Graham is curious, then Martin is talented, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not mad, then Chrysta is talented.
If there is at least one people who is both not curious and alive, then Chrysta is automatic.
Someone is not mad if and only if he is gifted.
It can be concluded that Chrysta is gifted once knowing that Chrysta is alive.
Lucia being not curious is equivalent to Chrysta being talented and Lionel being not mad.
If someone is not alive or talented, then he is gifted. | Graham is gifted. | self_contradiction |
Graham is not alive.
Martin is talented.
Lucia is mad.
Chrysta is talented.
Silvia is not automatic.
Lionel is alive.
Lionel is not talented.
Graham is gifted.
Chrysta is not alive.
Graham is not curious.
Everett is mad.
Everett is curious.If there is at least one people who is gifted, then Everett is automatic and Lucia is not curious.
If everyone is gifted, then Silvia is talented.
if there is at least one people who is not alive and mad, then Martin is not talented and Lionel is curious.
Someone who is not alive is always not gifted.
If someone is both not alive and curious, then he is not gifted.
If Graham is curious, then Martin is talented, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not mad, then Chrysta is talented.
If there is at least one people who is both not curious and alive, then Chrysta is automatic.
Someone is not mad if and only if he is gifted.
It can be concluded that Chrysta is gifted once knowing that Chrysta is alive.
Lucia being not curious is equivalent to Chrysta being talented and Lionel being not mad.
If someone is not alive or talented, then he is gifted. | Silvia is talented. | neutral |
Graham is not alive.
Martin is talented.
Lucia is mad.
Chrysta is talented.
Silvia is not automatic.
Lionel is alive.
Lionel is not talented.
Graham is gifted.
Chrysta is not alive.
Graham is not curious.
Everett is mad.
Everett is curious.If there is at least one people who is gifted, then Everett is automatic and Lucia is not curious.
If everyone is gifted, then Silvia is talented.
if there is at least one people who is not alive and mad, then Martin is not talented and Lionel is curious.
Someone who is not alive is always not gifted.
If someone is both not alive and curious, then he is not gifted.
If Graham is curious, then Martin is talented, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not mad, then Chrysta is talented.
If there is at least one people who is both not curious and alive, then Chrysta is automatic.
Someone is not mad if and only if he is gifted.
It can be concluded that Chrysta is gifted once knowing that Chrysta is alive.
Lucia being not curious is equivalent to Chrysta being talented and Lionel being not mad.
If someone is not alive or talented, then he is gifted. | Graham is not alive. | entailment |
Graham is not alive.
Martin is talented.
Lucia is mad.
Chrysta is talented.
Silvia is not automatic.
Lionel is alive.
Lionel is not talented.
Graham is gifted.
Chrysta is not alive.
Graham is not curious.
Everett is mad.
Everett is curious.If there is at least one people who is gifted, then Everett is automatic and Lucia is not curious.
If everyone is gifted, then Silvia is talented.
if there is at least one people who is not alive and mad, then Martin is not talented and Lionel is curious.
Someone who is not alive is always not gifted.
If someone is both not alive and curious, then he is not gifted.
If Graham is curious, then Martin is talented, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not mad, then Chrysta is talented.
If there is at least one people who is both not curious and alive, then Chrysta is automatic.
Someone is not mad if and only if he is gifted.
It can be concluded that Chrysta is gifted once knowing that Chrysta is alive.
Lucia being not curious is equivalent to Chrysta being talented and Lionel being not mad.
If someone is not alive or talented, then he is gifted. | Lucia is alive. | neutral |
Graham is not alive.
Martin is talented.
Lucia is mad.
Chrysta is talented.
Silvia is not automatic.
Lionel is alive.
Lionel is not talented.
Graham is gifted.
Chrysta is not alive.
Graham is not curious.
Everett is mad.
Everett is curious.If there is at least one people who is gifted, then Everett is automatic and Lucia is not curious.
If everyone is gifted, then Silvia is talented.
if there is at least one people who is not alive and mad, then Martin is not talented and Lionel is curious.
Someone who is not alive is always not gifted.
If someone is both not alive and curious, then he is not gifted.
If Graham is curious, then Martin is talented, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not mad, then Chrysta is talented.
If there is at least one people who is both not curious and alive, then Chrysta is automatic.
Someone is not mad if and only if he is gifted.
It can be concluded that Chrysta is gifted once knowing that Chrysta is alive.
Lucia being not curious is equivalent to Chrysta being talented and Lionel being not mad.
If someone is not alive or talented, then he is gifted. | Chrysta is not mad. | entailment |
Graham is not alive.
Martin is talented.
Lucia is mad.
Chrysta is talented.
Silvia is not automatic.
Lionel is alive.
Lionel is not talented.
Graham is gifted.
Chrysta is not alive.
Graham is not curious.
Everett is mad.
Everett is curious.If there is at least one people who is gifted, then Everett is automatic and Lucia is not curious.
If everyone is gifted, then Silvia is talented.
if there is at least one people who is not alive and mad, then Martin is not talented and Lionel is curious.
Someone who is not alive is always not gifted.
If someone is both not alive and curious, then he is not gifted.
If Graham is curious, then Martin is talented, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not mad, then Chrysta is talented.
If there is at least one people who is both not curious and alive, then Chrysta is automatic.
Someone is not mad if and only if he is gifted.
It can be concluded that Chrysta is gifted once knowing that Chrysta is alive.
Lucia being not curious is equivalent to Chrysta being talented and Lionel being not mad.
If someone is not alive or talented, then he is gifted. | Chrysta is mad. | contradiction |
Graham is not alive.
Martin is talented.
Lucia is mad.
Chrysta is talented.
Silvia is not automatic.
Lionel is alive.
Lionel is not talented.
Graham is gifted.
Chrysta is not alive.
Graham is not curious.
Everett is mad.
Everett is curious.If there is at least one people who is gifted, then Everett is automatic and Lucia is not curious.
If everyone is gifted, then Silvia is talented.
if there is at least one people who is not alive and mad, then Martin is not talented and Lionel is curious.
Someone who is not alive is always not gifted.
If someone is both not alive and curious, then he is not gifted.
If Graham is curious, then Martin is talented, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not mad, then Chrysta is talented.
If there is at least one people who is both not curious and alive, then Chrysta is automatic.
Someone is not mad if and only if he is gifted.
It can be concluded that Chrysta is gifted once knowing that Chrysta is alive.
Lucia being not curious is equivalent to Chrysta being talented and Lionel being not mad.
If someone is not alive or talented, then he is gifted. | Chrysta is not talented. | contradiction |
Graham is not alive.
Martin is talented.
Lucia is mad.
Chrysta is talented.
Silvia is not automatic.
Lionel is alive.
Lionel is not talented.
Graham is gifted.
Chrysta is not alive.
Graham is not curious.
Everett is mad.
Everett is curious.If there is at least one people who is gifted, then Everett is automatic and Lucia is not curious.
If everyone is gifted, then Silvia is talented.
if there is at least one people who is not alive and mad, then Martin is not talented and Lionel is curious.
Someone who is not alive is always not gifted.
If someone is both not alive and curious, then he is not gifted.
If Graham is curious, then Martin is talented, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not mad, then Chrysta is talented.
If there is at least one people who is both not curious and alive, then Chrysta is automatic.
Someone is not mad if and only if he is gifted.
It can be concluded that Chrysta is gifted once knowing that Chrysta is alive.
Lucia being not curious is equivalent to Chrysta being talented and Lionel being not mad.
If someone is not alive or talented, then he is gifted. | Lionel is alive. | entailment |
Graham is not alive.
Martin is talented.
Lucia is mad.
Chrysta is talented.
Silvia is not automatic.
Lionel is alive.
Lionel is not talented.
Graham is gifted.
Chrysta is not alive.
Graham is not curious.
Everett is mad.
Everett is curious.If there is at least one people who is gifted, then Everett is automatic and Lucia is not curious.
If everyone is gifted, then Silvia is talented.
if there is at least one people who is not alive and mad, then Martin is not talented and Lionel is curious.
Someone who is not alive is always not gifted.
If someone is both not alive and curious, then he is not gifted.
If Graham is curious, then Martin is talented, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not mad, then Chrysta is talented.
If there is at least one people who is both not curious and alive, then Chrysta is automatic.
Someone is not mad if and only if he is gifted.
It can be concluded that Chrysta is gifted once knowing that Chrysta is alive.
Lucia being not curious is equivalent to Chrysta being talented and Lionel being not mad.
If someone is not alive or talented, then he is gifted. | Lionel is mad. | contradiction |
Graham is not alive.
Martin is talented.
Lucia is mad.
Chrysta is talented.
Silvia is not automatic.
Lionel is alive.
Lionel is not talented.
Graham is gifted.
Chrysta is not alive.
Graham is not curious.
Everett is mad.
Everett is curious.If there is at least one people who is gifted, then Everett is automatic and Lucia is not curious.
If everyone is gifted, then Silvia is talented.
if there is at least one people who is not alive and mad, then Martin is not talented and Lionel is curious.
Someone who is not alive is always not gifted.
If someone is both not alive and curious, then he is not gifted.
If Graham is curious, then Martin is talented, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not mad, then Chrysta is talented.
If there is at least one people who is both not curious and alive, then Chrysta is automatic.
Someone is not mad if and only if he is gifted.
It can be concluded that Chrysta is gifted once knowing that Chrysta is alive.
Lucia being not curious is equivalent to Chrysta being talented and Lionel being not mad.
If someone is not alive or talented, then he is gifted. | Everett is automatic. | entailment |
Graham is not alive.
Martin is talented.
Lucia is mad.
Chrysta is talented.
Silvia is not automatic.
Lionel is alive.
Lionel is not talented.
Graham is gifted.
Chrysta is not alive.
Graham is not curious.
Everett is mad.
Everett is curious.If there is at least one people who is gifted, then Everett is automatic and Lucia is not curious.
If everyone is gifted, then Silvia is talented.
if there is at least one people who is not alive and mad, then Martin is not talented and Lionel is curious.
Someone who is not alive is always not gifted.
If someone is both not alive and curious, then he is not gifted.
If Graham is curious, then Martin is talented, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not mad, then Chrysta is talented.
If there is at least one people who is both not curious and alive, then Chrysta is automatic.
Someone is not mad if and only if he is gifted.
It can be concluded that Chrysta is gifted once knowing that Chrysta is alive.
Lucia being not curious is equivalent to Chrysta being talented and Lionel being not mad.
If someone is not alive or talented, then he is gifted. | Chrysta is not curious. | neutral |
Graham is not alive.
Martin is talented.
Lucia is mad.
Chrysta is talented.
Silvia is not automatic.
Lionel is alive.
Lionel is not talented.
Graham is gifted.
Chrysta is not alive.
Graham is not curious.
Everett is mad.
Everett is curious.If there is at least one people who is gifted, then Everett is automatic and Lucia is not curious.
If everyone is gifted, then Silvia is talented.
if there is at least one people who is not alive and mad, then Martin is not talented and Lionel is curious.
Someone who is not alive is always not gifted.
If someone is both not alive and curious, then he is not gifted.
If Graham is curious, then Martin is talented, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not mad, then Chrysta is talented.
If there is at least one people who is both not curious and alive, then Chrysta is automatic.
Someone is not mad if and only if he is gifted.
It can be concluded that Chrysta is gifted once knowing that Chrysta is alive.
Lucia being not curious is equivalent to Chrysta being talented and Lionel being not mad.
If someone is not alive or talented, then he is gifted. | Lucia is not talented. | neutral |
Graham is not alive.
Martin is talented.
Lucia is mad.
Chrysta is talented.
Silvia is not automatic.
Lionel is alive.
Lionel is not talented.
Graham is gifted.
Chrysta is not alive.
Graham is not curious.
Everett is mad.
Everett is curious.If there is at least one people who is gifted, then Everett is automatic and Lucia is not curious.
If everyone is gifted, then Silvia is talented.
if there is at least one people who is not alive and mad, then Martin is not talented and Lionel is curious.
Someone who is not alive is always not gifted.
If someone is both not alive and curious, then he is not gifted.
If Graham is curious, then Martin is talented, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not mad, then Chrysta is talented.
If there is at least one people who is both not curious and alive, then Chrysta is automatic.
Someone is not mad if and only if he is gifted.
It can be concluded that Chrysta is gifted once knowing that Chrysta is alive.
Lucia being not curious is equivalent to Chrysta being talented and Lionel being not mad.
If someone is not alive or talented, then he is gifted. | Graham is curious. | self_contradiction |
Graham is not alive.
Martin is talented.
Lucia is mad.
Chrysta is talented.
Silvia is not automatic.
Lionel is alive.
Lionel is not talented.
Graham is gifted.
Chrysta is not alive.
Graham is not curious.
Everett is mad.
Everett is curious.If there is at least one people who is gifted, then Everett is automatic and Lucia is not curious.
If everyone is gifted, then Silvia is talented.
if there is at least one people who is not alive and mad, then Martin is not talented and Lionel is curious.
Someone who is not alive is always not gifted.
If someone is both not alive and curious, then he is not gifted.
If Graham is curious, then Martin is talented, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not mad, then Chrysta is talented.
If there is at least one people who is both not curious and alive, then Chrysta is automatic.
Someone is not mad if and only if he is gifted.
It can be concluded that Chrysta is gifted once knowing that Chrysta is alive.
Lucia being not curious is equivalent to Chrysta being talented and Lionel being not mad.
If someone is not alive or talented, then he is gifted. | Chrysta is gifted. | self_contradiction |
Humphrey is psychological.
Humphrey is nutty.
Braden is not foolish.
Carroll is not tame.
Thomas is psychological.
Clifford is nutty.
Humphrey is odd.
Braden is not psychological.
Braden is odd.
Thomas is zealous.
Thomas is not nutty.
Gloria is tame.If there is someone who is not zealous, then Humphrey is not nutty.
Someone being both psychological and odd is equivalent to being zealous.
If there is someone who is psychological, then Clifford is foolish and Carroll is zealous.
Someone who is both tame and zealous is always not psychological.
If someone is not tame, then he is not foolish.
As long as someone is nutty, he is zealous and foolish.
Gloria being tame is equivalent to Clifford being zealous.
If Thomas is not foolish, then Carroll is not psychological and Thomas is tame, and vice versa.
Someone is not nutty and tame if and only if he is zealous.
If there is at least one people who is not zealous or odd, then Carroll is not nutty.
If there is someone who is both tame and nutty, then Carroll is not zealous.
If there is at least one people who is nutty or tame, then Gloria is not psychological. | Carroll is not nutty. | entailment |
Humphrey is psychological.
Humphrey is nutty.
Braden is not foolish.
Carroll is not tame.
Thomas is psychological.
Clifford is nutty.
Humphrey is odd.
Braden is not psychological.
Braden is odd.
Thomas is zealous.
Thomas is not nutty.
Gloria is tame.If there is someone who is not zealous, then Humphrey is not nutty.
Someone being both psychological and odd is equivalent to being zealous.
If there is someone who is psychological, then Clifford is foolish and Carroll is zealous.
Someone who is both tame and zealous is always not psychological.
If someone is not tame, then he is not foolish.
As long as someone is nutty, he is zealous and foolish.
Gloria being tame is equivalent to Clifford being zealous.
If Thomas is not foolish, then Carroll is not psychological and Thomas is tame, and vice versa.
Someone is not nutty and tame if and only if he is zealous.
If there is at least one people who is not zealous or odd, then Carroll is not nutty.
If there is someone who is both tame and nutty, then Carroll is not zealous.
If there is at least one people who is nutty or tame, then Gloria is not psychological. | Carroll is nutty. | contradiction |
Humphrey is psychological.
Humphrey is nutty.
Braden is not foolish.
Carroll is not tame.
Thomas is psychological.
Clifford is nutty.
Humphrey is odd.
Braden is not psychological.
Braden is odd.
Thomas is zealous.
Thomas is not nutty.
Gloria is tame.If there is someone who is not zealous, then Humphrey is not nutty.
Someone being both psychological and odd is equivalent to being zealous.
If there is someone who is psychological, then Clifford is foolish and Carroll is zealous.
Someone who is both tame and zealous is always not psychological.
If someone is not tame, then he is not foolish.
As long as someone is nutty, he is zealous and foolish.
Gloria being tame is equivalent to Clifford being zealous.
If Thomas is not foolish, then Carroll is not psychological and Thomas is tame, and vice versa.
Someone is not nutty and tame if and only if he is zealous.
If there is at least one people who is not zealous or odd, then Carroll is not nutty.
If there is someone who is both tame and nutty, then Carroll is not zealous.
If there is at least one people who is nutty or tame, then Gloria is not psychological. | Humphrey is not odd. | contradiction |
Humphrey is psychological.
Humphrey is nutty.
Braden is not foolish.
Carroll is not tame.
Thomas is psychological.
Clifford is nutty.
Humphrey is odd.
Braden is not psychological.
Braden is odd.
Thomas is zealous.
Thomas is not nutty.
Gloria is tame.If there is someone who is not zealous, then Humphrey is not nutty.
Someone being both psychological and odd is equivalent to being zealous.
If there is someone who is psychological, then Clifford is foolish and Carroll is zealous.
Someone who is both tame and zealous is always not psychological.
If someone is not tame, then he is not foolish.
As long as someone is nutty, he is zealous and foolish.
Gloria being tame is equivalent to Clifford being zealous.
If Thomas is not foolish, then Carroll is not psychological and Thomas is tame, and vice versa.
Someone is not nutty and tame if and only if he is zealous.
If there is at least one people who is not zealous or odd, then Carroll is not nutty.
If there is someone who is both tame and nutty, then Carroll is not zealous.
If there is at least one people who is nutty or tame, then Gloria is not psychological. | Glenn is tame. | neutral |
Humphrey is psychological.
Humphrey is nutty.
Braden is not foolish.
Carroll is not tame.
Thomas is psychological.
Clifford is nutty.
Humphrey is odd.
Braden is not psychological.
Braden is odd.
Thomas is zealous.
Thomas is not nutty.
Gloria is tame.If there is someone who is not zealous, then Humphrey is not nutty.
Someone being both psychological and odd is equivalent to being zealous.
If there is someone who is psychological, then Clifford is foolish and Carroll is zealous.
Someone who is both tame and zealous is always not psychological.
If someone is not tame, then he is not foolish.
As long as someone is nutty, he is zealous and foolish.
Gloria being tame is equivalent to Clifford being zealous.
If Thomas is not foolish, then Carroll is not psychological and Thomas is tame, and vice versa.
Someone is not nutty and tame if and only if he is zealous.
If there is at least one people who is not zealous or odd, then Carroll is not nutty.
If there is someone who is both tame and nutty, then Carroll is not zealous.
If there is at least one people who is nutty or tame, then Gloria is not psychological. | Carroll is not psychological. | self_contradiction |
Humphrey is psychological.
Humphrey is nutty.
Braden is not foolish.
Carroll is not tame.
Thomas is psychological.
Clifford is nutty.
Humphrey is odd.
Braden is not psychological.
Braden is odd.
Thomas is zealous.
Thomas is not nutty.
Gloria is tame.If there is someone who is not zealous, then Humphrey is not nutty.
Someone being both psychological and odd is equivalent to being zealous.
If there is someone who is psychological, then Clifford is foolish and Carroll is zealous.
Someone who is both tame and zealous is always not psychological.
If someone is not tame, then he is not foolish.
As long as someone is nutty, he is zealous and foolish.
Gloria being tame is equivalent to Clifford being zealous.
If Thomas is not foolish, then Carroll is not psychological and Thomas is tame, and vice versa.
Someone is not nutty and tame if and only if he is zealous.
If there is at least one people who is not zealous or odd, then Carroll is not nutty.
If there is someone who is both tame and nutty, then Carroll is not zealous.
If there is at least one people who is nutty or tame, then Gloria is not psychological. | Clifford is nutty. | self_contradiction |
Humphrey is psychological.
Humphrey is nutty.
Braden is not foolish.
Carroll is not tame.
Thomas is psychological.
Clifford is nutty.
Humphrey is odd.
Braden is not psychological.
Braden is odd.
Thomas is zealous.
Thomas is not nutty.
Gloria is tame.If there is someone who is not zealous, then Humphrey is not nutty.
Someone being both psychological and odd is equivalent to being zealous.
If there is someone who is psychological, then Clifford is foolish and Carroll is zealous.
Someone who is both tame and zealous is always not psychological.
If someone is not tame, then he is not foolish.
As long as someone is nutty, he is zealous and foolish.
Gloria being tame is equivalent to Clifford being zealous.
If Thomas is not foolish, then Carroll is not psychological and Thomas is tame, and vice versa.
Someone is not nutty and tame if and only if he is zealous.
If there is at least one people who is not zealous or odd, then Carroll is not nutty.
If there is someone who is both tame and nutty, then Carroll is not zealous.
If there is at least one people who is nutty or tame, then Gloria is not psychological. | Carroll is tame. | self_contradiction |
Humphrey is psychological.
Humphrey is nutty.
Braden is not foolish.
Carroll is not tame.
Thomas is psychological.
Clifford is nutty.
Humphrey is odd.
Braden is not psychological.
Braden is odd.
Thomas is zealous.
Thomas is not nutty.
Gloria is tame.If there is someone who is not zealous, then Humphrey is not nutty.
Someone being both psychological and odd is equivalent to being zealous.
If there is someone who is psychological, then Clifford is foolish and Carroll is zealous.
Someone who is both tame and zealous is always not psychological.
If someone is not tame, then he is not foolish.
As long as someone is nutty, he is zealous and foolish.
Gloria being tame is equivalent to Clifford being zealous.
If Thomas is not foolish, then Carroll is not psychological and Thomas is tame, and vice versa.
Someone is not nutty and tame if and only if he is zealous.
If there is at least one people who is not zealous or odd, then Carroll is not nutty.
If there is someone who is both tame and nutty, then Carroll is not zealous.
If there is at least one people who is nutty or tame, then Gloria is not psychological. | Thomas is odd. | entailment |
Humphrey is psychological.
Humphrey is nutty.
Braden is not foolish.
Carroll is not tame.
Thomas is psychological.
Clifford is nutty.
Humphrey is odd.
Braden is not psychological.
Braden is odd.
Thomas is zealous.
Thomas is not nutty.
Gloria is tame.If there is someone who is not zealous, then Humphrey is not nutty.
Someone being both psychological and odd is equivalent to being zealous.
If there is someone who is psychological, then Clifford is foolish and Carroll is zealous.
Someone who is both tame and zealous is always not psychological.
If someone is not tame, then he is not foolish.
As long as someone is nutty, he is zealous and foolish.
Gloria being tame is equivalent to Clifford being zealous.
If Thomas is not foolish, then Carroll is not psychological and Thomas is tame, and vice versa.
Someone is not nutty and tame if and only if he is zealous.
If there is at least one people who is not zealous or odd, then Carroll is not nutty.
If there is someone who is both tame and nutty, then Carroll is not zealous.
If there is at least one people who is nutty or tame, then Gloria is not psychological. | Gloria is odd. | neutral |
Humphrey is psychological.
Humphrey is nutty.
Braden is not foolish.
Carroll is not tame.
Thomas is psychological.
Clifford is nutty.
Humphrey is odd.
Braden is not psychological.
Braden is odd.
Thomas is zealous.
Thomas is not nutty.
Gloria is tame.If there is someone who is not zealous, then Humphrey is not nutty.
Someone being both psychological and odd is equivalent to being zealous.
If there is someone who is psychological, then Clifford is foolish and Carroll is zealous.
Someone who is both tame and zealous is always not psychological.
If someone is not tame, then he is not foolish.
As long as someone is nutty, he is zealous and foolish.
Gloria being tame is equivalent to Clifford being zealous.
If Thomas is not foolish, then Carroll is not psychological and Thomas is tame, and vice versa.
Someone is not nutty and tame if and only if he is zealous.
If there is at least one people who is not zealous or odd, then Carroll is not nutty.
If there is someone who is both tame and nutty, then Carroll is not zealous.
If there is at least one people who is nutty or tame, then Gloria is not psychological. | Carroll is not foolish. | entailment |
Humphrey is psychological.
Humphrey is nutty.
Braden is not foolish.
Carroll is not tame.
Thomas is psychological.
Clifford is nutty.
Humphrey is odd.
Braden is not psychological.
Braden is odd.
Thomas is zealous.
Thomas is not nutty.
Gloria is tame.If there is someone who is not zealous, then Humphrey is not nutty.
Someone being both psychological and odd is equivalent to being zealous.
If there is someone who is psychological, then Clifford is foolish and Carroll is zealous.
Someone who is both tame and zealous is always not psychological.
If someone is not tame, then he is not foolish.
As long as someone is nutty, he is zealous and foolish.
Gloria being tame is equivalent to Clifford being zealous.
If Thomas is not foolish, then Carroll is not psychological and Thomas is tame, and vice versa.
Someone is not nutty and tame if and only if he is zealous.
If there is at least one people who is not zealous or odd, then Carroll is not nutty.
If there is someone who is both tame and nutty, then Carroll is not zealous.
If there is at least one people who is nutty or tame, then Gloria is not psychological. | Gloria is not psychological. | entailment |
Humphrey is psychological.
Humphrey is nutty.
Braden is not foolish.
Carroll is not tame.
Thomas is psychological.
Clifford is nutty.
Humphrey is odd.
Braden is not psychological.
Braden is odd.
Thomas is zealous.
Thomas is not nutty.
Gloria is tame.If there is someone who is not zealous, then Humphrey is not nutty.
Someone being both psychological and odd is equivalent to being zealous.
If there is someone who is psychological, then Clifford is foolish and Carroll is zealous.
Someone who is both tame and zealous is always not psychological.
If someone is not tame, then he is not foolish.
As long as someone is nutty, he is zealous and foolish.
Gloria being tame is equivalent to Clifford being zealous.
If Thomas is not foolish, then Carroll is not psychological and Thomas is tame, and vice versa.
Someone is not nutty and tame if and only if he is zealous.
If there is at least one people who is not zealous or odd, then Carroll is not nutty.
If there is someone who is both tame and nutty, then Carroll is not zealous.
If there is at least one people who is nutty or tame, then Gloria is not psychological. | Glenn is not foolish. | neutral |
Humphrey is psychological.
Humphrey is nutty.
Braden is not foolish.
Carroll is not tame.
Thomas is psychological.
Clifford is nutty.
Humphrey is odd.
Braden is not psychological.
Braden is odd.
Thomas is zealous.
Thomas is not nutty.
Gloria is tame.If there is someone who is not zealous, then Humphrey is not nutty.
Someone being both psychological and odd is equivalent to being zealous.
If there is someone who is psychological, then Clifford is foolish and Carroll is zealous.
Someone who is both tame and zealous is always not psychological.
If someone is not tame, then he is not foolish.
As long as someone is nutty, he is zealous and foolish.
Gloria being tame is equivalent to Clifford being zealous.
If Thomas is not foolish, then Carroll is not psychological and Thomas is tame, and vice versa.
Someone is not nutty and tame if and only if he is zealous.
If there is at least one people who is not zealous or odd, then Carroll is not nutty.
If there is someone who is both tame and nutty, then Carroll is not zealous.
If there is at least one people who is nutty or tame, then Gloria is not psychological. | Humphrey is zealous. | entailment |
Humphrey is psychological.
Humphrey is nutty.
Braden is not foolish.
Carroll is not tame.
Thomas is psychological.
Clifford is nutty.
Humphrey is odd.
Braden is not psychological.
Braden is odd.
Thomas is zealous.
Thomas is not nutty.
Gloria is tame.If there is someone who is not zealous, then Humphrey is not nutty.
Someone being both psychological and odd is equivalent to being zealous.
If there is someone who is psychological, then Clifford is foolish and Carroll is zealous.
Someone who is both tame and zealous is always not psychological.
If someone is not tame, then he is not foolish.
As long as someone is nutty, he is zealous and foolish.
Gloria being tame is equivalent to Clifford being zealous.
If Thomas is not foolish, then Carroll is not psychological and Thomas is tame, and vice versa.
Someone is not nutty and tame if and only if he is zealous.
If there is at least one people who is not zealous or odd, then Carroll is not nutty.
If there is someone who is both tame and nutty, then Carroll is not zealous.
If there is at least one people who is nutty or tame, then Gloria is not psychological. | Glenn is zealous. | neutral |
Humphrey is psychological.
Humphrey is nutty.
Braden is not foolish.
Carroll is not tame.
Thomas is psychological.
Clifford is nutty.
Humphrey is odd.
Braden is not psychological.
Braden is odd.
Thomas is zealous.
Thomas is not nutty.
Gloria is tame.If there is someone who is not zealous, then Humphrey is not nutty.
Someone being both psychological and odd is equivalent to being zealous.
If there is someone who is psychological, then Clifford is foolish and Carroll is zealous.
Someone who is both tame and zealous is always not psychological.
If someone is not tame, then he is not foolish.
As long as someone is nutty, he is zealous and foolish.
Gloria being tame is equivalent to Clifford being zealous.
If Thomas is not foolish, then Carroll is not psychological and Thomas is tame, and vice versa.
Someone is not nutty and tame if and only if he is zealous.
If there is at least one people who is not zealous or odd, then Carroll is not nutty.
If there is someone who is both tame and nutty, then Carroll is not zealous.
If there is at least one people who is nutty or tame, then Gloria is not psychological. | Humphrey is psychological. | self_contradiction |
Humphrey is psychological.
Humphrey is nutty.
Braden is not foolish.
Carroll is not tame.
Thomas is psychological.
Clifford is nutty.
Humphrey is odd.
Braden is not psychological.
Braden is odd.
Thomas is zealous.
Thomas is not nutty.
Gloria is tame.If there is someone who is not zealous, then Humphrey is not nutty.
Someone being both psychological and odd is equivalent to being zealous.
If there is someone who is psychological, then Clifford is foolish and Carroll is zealous.
Someone who is both tame and zealous is always not psychological.
If someone is not tame, then he is not foolish.
As long as someone is nutty, he is zealous and foolish.
Gloria being tame is equivalent to Clifford being zealous.
If Thomas is not foolish, then Carroll is not psychological and Thomas is tame, and vice versa.
Someone is not nutty and tame if and only if he is zealous.
If there is at least one people who is not zealous or odd, then Carroll is not nutty.
If there is someone who is both tame and nutty, then Carroll is not zealous.
If there is at least one people who is nutty or tame, then Gloria is not psychological. | Clifford is not foolish. | contradiction |
Humphrey is psychological.
Humphrey is nutty.
Braden is not foolish.
Carroll is not tame.
Thomas is psychological.
Clifford is nutty.
Humphrey is odd.
Braden is not psychological.
Braden is odd.
Thomas is zealous.
Thomas is not nutty.
Gloria is tame.If there is someone who is not zealous, then Humphrey is not nutty.
Someone being both psychological and odd is equivalent to being zealous.
If there is someone who is psychological, then Clifford is foolish and Carroll is zealous.
Someone who is both tame and zealous is always not psychological.
If someone is not tame, then he is not foolish.
As long as someone is nutty, he is zealous and foolish.
Gloria being tame is equivalent to Clifford being zealous.
If Thomas is not foolish, then Carroll is not psychological and Thomas is tame, and vice versa.
Someone is not nutty and tame if and only if he is zealous.
If there is at least one people who is not zealous or odd, then Carroll is not nutty.
If there is someone who is both tame and nutty, then Carroll is not zealous.
If there is at least one people who is nutty or tame, then Gloria is not psychological. | Braden is foolish. | contradiction |
Humphrey is psychological.
Humphrey is nutty.
Braden is not foolish.
Carroll is not tame.
Thomas is psychological.
Clifford is nutty.
Humphrey is odd.
Braden is not psychological.
Braden is odd.
Thomas is zealous.
Thomas is not nutty.
Gloria is tame.If there is someone who is not zealous, then Humphrey is not nutty.
Someone being both psychological and odd is equivalent to being zealous.
If there is someone who is psychological, then Clifford is foolish and Carroll is zealous.
Someone who is both tame and zealous is always not psychological.
If someone is not tame, then he is not foolish.
As long as someone is nutty, he is zealous and foolish.
Gloria being tame is equivalent to Clifford being zealous.
If Thomas is not foolish, then Carroll is not psychological and Thomas is tame, and vice versa.
Someone is not nutty and tame if and only if he is zealous.
If there is at least one people who is not zealous or odd, then Carroll is not nutty.
If there is someone who is both tame and nutty, then Carroll is not zealous.
If there is at least one people who is nutty or tame, then Gloria is not psychological. | Braden is not tame. | neutral |
Humphrey is psychological.
Humphrey is nutty.
Braden is not foolish.
Carroll is not tame.
Thomas is psychological.
Clifford is nutty.
Humphrey is odd.
Braden is not psychological.
Braden is odd.
Thomas is zealous.
Thomas is not nutty.
Gloria is tame.If there is someone who is not zealous, then Humphrey is not nutty.
Someone being both psychological and odd is equivalent to being zealous.
If there is someone who is psychological, then Clifford is foolish and Carroll is zealous.
Someone who is both tame and zealous is always not psychological.
If someone is not tame, then he is not foolish.
As long as someone is nutty, he is zealous and foolish.
Gloria being tame is equivalent to Clifford being zealous.
If Thomas is not foolish, then Carroll is not psychological and Thomas is tame, and vice versa.
Someone is not nutty and tame if and only if he is zealous.
If there is at least one people who is not zealous or odd, then Carroll is not nutty.
If there is someone who is both tame and nutty, then Carroll is not zealous.
If there is at least one people who is nutty or tame, then Gloria is not psychological. | Thomas is not psychological. | self_contradiction |
Humphrey is psychological.
Humphrey is nutty.
Braden is not foolish.
Carroll is not tame.
Thomas is psychological.
Clifford is nutty.
Humphrey is odd.
Braden is not psychological.
Braden is odd.
Thomas is zealous.
Thomas is not nutty.
Gloria is tame.If there is someone who is not zealous, then Humphrey is not nutty.
Someone being both psychological and odd is equivalent to being zealous.
If there is someone who is psychological, then Clifford is foolish and Carroll is zealous.
Someone who is both tame and zealous is always not psychological.
If someone is not tame, then he is not foolish.
As long as someone is nutty, he is zealous and foolish.
Gloria being tame is equivalent to Clifford being zealous.
If Thomas is not foolish, then Carroll is not psychological and Thomas is tame, and vice versa.
Someone is not nutty and tame if and only if he is zealous.
If there is at least one people who is not zealous or odd, then Carroll is not nutty.
If there is someone who is both tame and nutty, then Carroll is not zealous.
If there is at least one people who is nutty or tame, then Gloria is not psychological. | Clifford is not tame. | contradiction |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.