premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Nathalie is administrative.
Valentina is not zealous.
Nathalie is not perfect.
Ethan is political.
Nathalie is relevant.
Nathalie is political.
Arthur is steep.
Corwin is not administrative.
Valentina is perfect.
Jarvis is not administrative.
Arthur is not perfect.
Ethan is relevant.If there is someone who is administrative, then Valentina is political and Nathalie is not steep.
If someone is steep or zealous, then he is political.
If someone who is not steep is also perfect, then he is not administrative.
If there is someone who is zealous, then Valentina is not political.
If someone is both political and not zealous, then he is not relevant.
Someone who is not steep is always both political and not administrative.
If Corwin is steep, then Silvia is perfect and Jarvis is not political, and vice versa.
If someone is political, then he is both steep and not zealous.
It can be concluded that Corwin is administrative once knowing that Ethan is not perfect or Arthur is political.
If someone is not steep and not perfect, then he is both administrative and not zealous, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jarvis is political once knowing that Corwin is not relevant.
Jarvis being not administrative and Valentina being perfect imply that Arthur is steep. | Valentina is relevant. | contradiction |
Nathalie is administrative.
Valentina is not zealous.
Nathalie is not perfect.
Ethan is political.
Nathalie is relevant.
Nathalie is political.
Arthur is steep.
Corwin is not administrative.
Valentina is perfect.
Jarvis is not administrative.
Arthur is not perfect.
Ethan is relevant.If there is someone who is administrative, then Valentina is political and Nathalie is not steep.
If someone is steep or zealous, then he is political.
If someone who is not steep is also perfect, then he is not administrative.
If there is someone who is zealous, then Valentina is not political.
If someone is both political and not zealous, then he is not relevant.
Someone who is not steep is always both political and not administrative.
If Corwin is steep, then Silvia is perfect and Jarvis is not political, and vice versa.
If someone is political, then he is both steep and not zealous.
It can be concluded that Corwin is administrative once knowing that Ethan is not perfect or Arthur is political.
If someone is not steep and not perfect, then he is both administrative and not zealous, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jarvis is political once knowing that Corwin is not relevant.
Jarvis being not administrative and Valentina being perfect imply that Arthur is steep. | Corwin is relevant. | neutral |
Nathalie is administrative.
Valentina is not zealous.
Nathalie is not perfect.
Ethan is political.
Nathalie is relevant.
Nathalie is political.
Arthur is steep.
Corwin is not administrative.
Valentina is perfect.
Jarvis is not administrative.
Arthur is not perfect.
Ethan is relevant.If there is someone who is administrative, then Valentina is political and Nathalie is not steep.
If someone is steep or zealous, then he is political.
If someone who is not steep is also perfect, then he is not administrative.
If there is someone who is zealous, then Valentina is not political.
If someone is both political and not zealous, then he is not relevant.
Someone who is not steep is always both political and not administrative.
If Corwin is steep, then Silvia is perfect and Jarvis is not political, and vice versa.
If someone is political, then he is both steep and not zealous.
It can be concluded that Corwin is administrative once knowing that Ethan is not perfect or Arthur is political.
If someone is not steep and not perfect, then he is both administrative and not zealous, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jarvis is political once knowing that Corwin is not relevant.
Jarvis being not administrative and Valentina being perfect imply that Arthur is steep. | Corwin is not steep. | neutral |
Nathalie is administrative.
Valentina is not zealous.
Nathalie is not perfect.
Ethan is political.
Nathalie is relevant.
Nathalie is political.
Arthur is steep.
Corwin is not administrative.
Valentina is perfect.
Jarvis is not administrative.
Arthur is not perfect.
Ethan is relevant.If there is someone who is administrative, then Valentina is political and Nathalie is not steep.
If someone is steep or zealous, then he is political.
If someone who is not steep is also perfect, then he is not administrative.
If there is someone who is zealous, then Valentina is not political.
If someone is both political and not zealous, then he is not relevant.
Someone who is not steep is always both political and not administrative.
If Corwin is steep, then Silvia is perfect and Jarvis is not political, and vice versa.
If someone is political, then he is both steep and not zealous.
It can be concluded that Corwin is administrative once knowing that Ethan is not perfect or Arthur is political.
If someone is not steep and not perfect, then he is both administrative and not zealous, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jarvis is political once knowing that Corwin is not relevant.
Jarvis being not administrative and Valentina being perfect imply that Arthur is steep. | Valentina is not perfect. | contradiction |
Nathalie is administrative.
Valentina is not zealous.
Nathalie is not perfect.
Ethan is political.
Nathalie is relevant.
Nathalie is political.
Arthur is steep.
Corwin is not administrative.
Valentina is perfect.
Jarvis is not administrative.
Arthur is not perfect.
Ethan is relevant.If there is someone who is administrative, then Valentina is political and Nathalie is not steep.
If someone is steep or zealous, then he is political.
If someone who is not steep is also perfect, then he is not administrative.
If there is someone who is zealous, then Valentina is not political.
If someone is both political and not zealous, then he is not relevant.
Someone who is not steep is always both political and not administrative.
If Corwin is steep, then Silvia is perfect and Jarvis is not political, and vice versa.
If someone is political, then he is both steep and not zealous.
It can be concluded that Corwin is administrative once knowing that Ethan is not perfect or Arthur is political.
If someone is not steep and not perfect, then he is both administrative and not zealous, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jarvis is political once knowing that Corwin is not relevant.
Jarvis being not administrative and Valentina being perfect imply that Arthur is steep. | Valentina is zealous. | contradiction |
Nathalie is administrative.
Valentina is not zealous.
Nathalie is not perfect.
Ethan is political.
Nathalie is relevant.
Nathalie is political.
Arthur is steep.
Corwin is not administrative.
Valentina is perfect.
Jarvis is not administrative.
Arthur is not perfect.
Ethan is relevant.If there is someone who is administrative, then Valentina is political and Nathalie is not steep.
If someone is steep or zealous, then he is political.
If someone who is not steep is also perfect, then he is not administrative.
If there is someone who is zealous, then Valentina is not political.
If someone is both political and not zealous, then he is not relevant.
Someone who is not steep is always both political and not administrative.
If Corwin is steep, then Silvia is perfect and Jarvis is not political, and vice versa.
If someone is political, then he is both steep and not zealous.
It can be concluded that Corwin is administrative once knowing that Ethan is not perfect or Arthur is political.
If someone is not steep and not perfect, then he is both administrative and not zealous, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jarvis is political once knowing that Corwin is not relevant.
Jarvis being not administrative and Valentina being perfect imply that Arthur is steep. | Silvia is steep. | neutral |
Nathalie is administrative.
Valentina is not zealous.
Nathalie is not perfect.
Ethan is political.
Nathalie is relevant.
Nathalie is political.
Arthur is steep.
Corwin is not administrative.
Valentina is perfect.
Jarvis is not administrative.
Arthur is not perfect.
Ethan is relevant.If there is someone who is administrative, then Valentina is political and Nathalie is not steep.
If someone is steep or zealous, then he is political.
If someone who is not steep is also perfect, then he is not administrative.
If there is someone who is zealous, then Valentina is not political.
If someone is both political and not zealous, then he is not relevant.
Someone who is not steep is always both political and not administrative.
If Corwin is steep, then Silvia is perfect and Jarvis is not political, and vice versa.
If someone is political, then he is both steep and not zealous.
It can be concluded that Corwin is administrative once knowing that Ethan is not perfect or Arthur is political.
If someone is not steep and not perfect, then he is both administrative and not zealous, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jarvis is political once knowing that Corwin is not relevant.
Jarvis being not administrative and Valentina being perfect imply that Arthur is steep. | Nathalie is not political. | contradiction |
Nathalie is administrative.
Valentina is not zealous.
Nathalie is not perfect.
Ethan is political.
Nathalie is relevant.
Nathalie is political.
Arthur is steep.
Corwin is not administrative.
Valentina is perfect.
Jarvis is not administrative.
Arthur is not perfect.
Ethan is relevant.If there is someone who is administrative, then Valentina is political and Nathalie is not steep.
If someone is steep or zealous, then he is political.
If someone who is not steep is also perfect, then he is not administrative.
If there is someone who is zealous, then Valentina is not political.
If someone is both political and not zealous, then he is not relevant.
Someone who is not steep is always both political and not administrative.
If Corwin is steep, then Silvia is perfect and Jarvis is not political, and vice versa.
If someone is political, then he is both steep and not zealous.
It can be concluded that Corwin is administrative once knowing that Ethan is not perfect or Arthur is political.
If someone is not steep and not perfect, then he is both administrative and not zealous, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jarvis is political once knowing that Corwin is not relevant.
Jarvis being not administrative and Valentina being perfect imply that Arthur is steep. | Nathalie is relevant. | self_contradiction |
Nathalie is administrative.
Valentina is not zealous.
Nathalie is not perfect.
Ethan is political.
Nathalie is relevant.
Nathalie is political.
Arthur is steep.
Corwin is not administrative.
Valentina is perfect.
Jarvis is not administrative.
Arthur is not perfect.
Ethan is relevant.If there is someone who is administrative, then Valentina is political and Nathalie is not steep.
If someone is steep or zealous, then he is political.
If someone who is not steep is also perfect, then he is not administrative.
If there is someone who is zealous, then Valentina is not political.
If someone is both political and not zealous, then he is not relevant.
Someone who is not steep is always both political and not administrative.
If Corwin is steep, then Silvia is perfect and Jarvis is not political, and vice versa.
If someone is political, then he is both steep and not zealous.
It can be concluded that Corwin is administrative once knowing that Ethan is not perfect or Arthur is political.
If someone is not steep and not perfect, then he is both administrative and not zealous, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jarvis is political once knowing that Corwin is not relevant.
Jarvis being not administrative and Valentina being perfect imply that Arthur is steep. | Ethan is not relevant. | self_contradiction |
Nathalie is administrative.
Valentina is not zealous.
Nathalie is not perfect.
Ethan is political.
Nathalie is relevant.
Nathalie is political.
Arthur is steep.
Corwin is not administrative.
Valentina is perfect.
Jarvis is not administrative.
Arthur is not perfect.
Ethan is relevant.If there is someone who is administrative, then Valentina is political and Nathalie is not steep.
If someone is steep or zealous, then he is political.
If someone who is not steep is also perfect, then he is not administrative.
If there is someone who is zealous, then Valentina is not political.
If someone is both political and not zealous, then he is not relevant.
Someone who is not steep is always both political and not administrative.
If Corwin is steep, then Silvia is perfect and Jarvis is not political, and vice versa.
If someone is political, then he is both steep and not zealous.
It can be concluded that Corwin is administrative once knowing that Ethan is not perfect or Arthur is political.
If someone is not steep and not perfect, then he is both administrative and not zealous, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jarvis is political once knowing that Corwin is not relevant.
Jarvis being not administrative and Valentina being perfect imply that Arthur is steep. | Arthur is steep. | entailment |
Nathalie is administrative.
Valentina is not zealous.
Nathalie is not perfect.
Ethan is political.
Nathalie is relevant.
Nathalie is political.
Arthur is steep.
Corwin is not administrative.
Valentina is perfect.
Jarvis is not administrative.
Arthur is not perfect.
Ethan is relevant.If there is someone who is administrative, then Valentina is political and Nathalie is not steep.
If someone is steep or zealous, then he is political.
If someone who is not steep is also perfect, then he is not administrative.
If there is someone who is zealous, then Valentina is not political.
If someone is both political and not zealous, then he is not relevant.
Someone who is not steep is always both political and not administrative.
If Corwin is steep, then Silvia is perfect and Jarvis is not political, and vice versa.
If someone is political, then he is both steep and not zealous.
It can be concluded that Corwin is administrative once knowing that Ethan is not perfect or Arthur is political.
If someone is not steep and not perfect, then he is both administrative and not zealous, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jarvis is political once knowing that Corwin is not relevant.
Jarvis being not administrative and Valentina being perfect imply that Arthur is steep. | Nathalie is not relevant. | self_contradiction |
Nathalie is administrative.
Valentina is not zealous.
Nathalie is not perfect.
Ethan is political.
Nathalie is relevant.
Nathalie is political.
Arthur is steep.
Corwin is not administrative.
Valentina is perfect.
Jarvis is not administrative.
Arthur is not perfect.
Ethan is relevant.If there is someone who is administrative, then Valentina is political and Nathalie is not steep.
If someone is steep or zealous, then he is political.
If someone who is not steep is also perfect, then he is not administrative.
If there is someone who is zealous, then Valentina is not political.
If someone is both political and not zealous, then he is not relevant.
Someone who is not steep is always both political and not administrative.
If Corwin is steep, then Silvia is perfect and Jarvis is not political, and vice versa.
If someone is political, then he is both steep and not zealous.
It can be concluded that Corwin is administrative once knowing that Ethan is not perfect or Arthur is political.
If someone is not steep and not perfect, then he is both administrative and not zealous, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jarvis is political once knowing that Corwin is not relevant.
Jarvis being not administrative and Valentina being perfect imply that Arthur is steep. | Ethan is political. | entailment |
Nathalie is administrative.
Valentina is not zealous.
Nathalie is not perfect.
Ethan is political.
Nathalie is relevant.
Nathalie is political.
Arthur is steep.
Corwin is not administrative.
Valentina is perfect.
Jarvis is not administrative.
Arthur is not perfect.
Ethan is relevant.If there is someone who is administrative, then Valentina is political and Nathalie is not steep.
If someone is steep or zealous, then he is political.
If someone who is not steep is also perfect, then he is not administrative.
If there is someone who is zealous, then Valentina is not political.
If someone is both political and not zealous, then he is not relevant.
Someone who is not steep is always both political and not administrative.
If Corwin is steep, then Silvia is perfect and Jarvis is not political, and vice versa.
If someone is political, then he is both steep and not zealous.
It can be concluded that Corwin is administrative once knowing that Ethan is not perfect or Arthur is political.
If someone is not steep and not perfect, then he is both administrative and not zealous, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jarvis is political once knowing that Corwin is not relevant.
Jarvis being not administrative and Valentina being perfect imply that Arthur is steep. | Ethan is perfect. | neutral |
Nathalie is administrative.
Valentina is not zealous.
Nathalie is not perfect.
Ethan is political.
Nathalie is relevant.
Nathalie is political.
Arthur is steep.
Corwin is not administrative.
Valentina is perfect.
Jarvis is not administrative.
Arthur is not perfect.
Ethan is relevant.If there is someone who is administrative, then Valentina is political and Nathalie is not steep.
If someone is steep or zealous, then he is political.
If someone who is not steep is also perfect, then he is not administrative.
If there is someone who is zealous, then Valentina is not political.
If someone is both political and not zealous, then he is not relevant.
Someone who is not steep is always both political and not administrative.
If Corwin is steep, then Silvia is perfect and Jarvis is not political, and vice versa.
If someone is political, then he is both steep and not zealous.
It can be concluded that Corwin is administrative once knowing that Ethan is not perfect or Arthur is political.
If someone is not steep and not perfect, then he is both administrative and not zealous, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jarvis is political once knowing that Corwin is not relevant.
Jarvis being not administrative and Valentina being perfect imply that Arthur is steep. | Corwin is administrative. | self_contradiction |
Nathalie is administrative.
Valentina is not zealous.
Nathalie is not perfect.
Ethan is political.
Nathalie is relevant.
Nathalie is political.
Arthur is steep.
Corwin is not administrative.
Valentina is perfect.
Jarvis is not administrative.
Arthur is not perfect.
Ethan is relevant.If there is someone who is administrative, then Valentina is political and Nathalie is not steep.
If someone is steep or zealous, then he is political.
If someone who is not steep is also perfect, then he is not administrative.
If there is someone who is zealous, then Valentina is not political.
If someone is both political and not zealous, then he is not relevant.
Someone who is not steep is always both political and not administrative.
If Corwin is steep, then Silvia is perfect and Jarvis is not political, and vice versa.
If someone is political, then he is both steep and not zealous.
It can be concluded that Corwin is administrative once knowing that Ethan is not perfect or Arthur is political.
If someone is not steep and not perfect, then he is both administrative and not zealous, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jarvis is political once knowing that Corwin is not relevant.
Jarvis being not administrative and Valentina being perfect imply that Arthur is steep. | Ethan is not political. | contradiction |
Nathalie is administrative.
Valentina is not zealous.
Nathalie is not perfect.
Ethan is political.
Nathalie is relevant.
Nathalie is political.
Arthur is steep.
Corwin is not administrative.
Valentina is perfect.
Jarvis is not administrative.
Arthur is not perfect.
Ethan is relevant.If there is someone who is administrative, then Valentina is political and Nathalie is not steep.
If someone is steep or zealous, then he is political.
If someone who is not steep is also perfect, then he is not administrative.
If there is someone who is zealous, then Valentina is not political.
If someone is both political and not zealous, then he is not relevant.
Someone who is not steep is always both political and not administrative.
If Corwin is steep, then Silvia is perfect and Jarvis is not political, and vice versa.
If someone is political, then he is both steep and not zealous.
It can be concluded that Corwin is administrative once knowing that Ethan is not perfect or Arthur is political.
If someone is not steep and not perfect, then he is both administrative and not zealous, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jarvis is political once knowing that Corwin is not relevant.
Jarvis being not administrative and Valentina being perfect imply that Arthur is steep. | Jarvis is perfect. | neutral |
Nathalie is administrative.
Valentina is not zealous.
Nathalie is not perfect.
Ethan is political.
Nathalie is relevant.
Nathalie is political.
Arthur is steep.
Corwin is not administrative.
Valentina is perfect.
Jarvis is not administrative.
Arthur is not perfect.
Ethan is relevant.If there is someone who is administrative, then Valentina is political and Nathalie is not steep.
If someone is steep or zealous, then he is political.
If someone who is not steep is also perfect, then he is not administrative.
If there is someone who is zealous, then Valentina is not political.
If someone is both political and not zealous, then he is not relevant.
Someone who is not steep is always both political and not administrative.
If Corwin is steep, then Silvia is perfect and Jarvis is not political, and vice versa.
If someone is political, then he is both steep and not zealous.
It can be concluded that Corwin is administrative once knowing that Ethan is not perfect or Arthur is political.
If someone is not steep and not perfect, then he is both administrative and not zealous, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jarvis is political once knowing that Corwin is not relevant.
Jarvis being not administrative and Valentina being perfect imply that Arthur is steep. | Nathalie is not steep. | self_contradiction |
Nathalie is administrative.
Valentina is not zealous.
Nathalie is not perfect.
Ethan is political.
Nathalie is relevant.
Nathalie is political.
Arthur is steep.
Corwin is not administrative.
Valentina is perfect.
Jarvis is not administrative.
Arthur is not perfect.
Ethan is relevant.If there is someone who is administrative, then Valentina is political and Nathalie is not steep.
If someone is steep or zealous, then he is political.
If someone who is not steep is also perfect, then he is not administrative.
If there is someone who is zealous, then Valentina is not political.
If someone is both political and not zealous, then he is not relevant.
Someone who is not steep is always both political and not administrative.
If Corwin is steep, then Silvia is perfect and Jarvis is not political, and vice versa.
If someone is political, then he is both steep and not zealous.
It can be concluded that Corwin is administrative once knowing that Ethan is not perfect or Arthur is political.
If someone is not steep and not perfect, then he is both administrative and not zealous, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jarvis is political once knowing that Corwin is not relevant.
Jarvis being not administrative and Valentina being perfect imply that Arthur is steep. | Jarvis is not administrative. | entailment |
Nathalie is administrative.
Valentina is not zealous.
Nathalie is not perfect.
Ethan is political.
Nathalie is relevant.
Nathalie is political.
Arthur is steep.
Corwin is not administrative.
Valentina is perfect.
Jarvis is not administrative.
Arthur is not perfect.
Ethan is relevant.If there is someone who is administrative, then Valentina is political and Nathalie is not steep.
If someone is steep or zealous, then he is political.
If someone who is not steep is also perfect, then he is not administrative.
If there is someone who is zealous, then Valentina is not political.
If someone is both political and not zealous, then he is not relevant.
Someone who is not steep is always both political and not administrative.
If Corwin is steep, then Silvia is perfect and Jarvis is not political, and vice versa.
If someone is political, then he is both steep and not zealous.
It can be concluded that Corwin is administrative once knowing that Ethan is not perfect or Arthur is political.
If someone is not steep and not perfect, then he is both administrative and not zealous, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jarvis is political once knowing that Corwin is not relevant.
Jarvis being not administrative and Valentina being perfect imply that Arthur is steep. | Valentina is not relevant. | entailment |
Nathalie is administrative.
Valentina is not zealous.
Nathalie is not perfect.
Ethan is political.
Nathalie is relevant.
Nathalie is political.
Arthur is steep.
Corwin is not administrative.
Valentina is perfect.
Jarvis is not administrative.
Arthur is not perfect.
Ethan is relevant.If there is someone who is administrative, then Valentina is political and Nathalie is not steep.
If someone is steep or zealous, then he is political.
If someone who is not steep is also perfect, then he is not administrative.
If there is someone who is zealous, then Valentina is not political.
If someone is both political and not zealous, then he is not relevant.
Someone who is not steep is always both political and not administrative.
If Corwin is steep, then Silvia is perfect and Jarvis is not political, and vice versa.
If someone is political, then he is both steep and not zealous.
It can be concluded that Corwin is administrative once knowing that Ethan is not perfect or Arthur is political.
If someone is not steep and not perfect, then he is both administrative and not zealous, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jarvis is political once knowing that Corwin is not relevant.
Jarvis being not administrative and Valentina being perfect imply that Arthur is steep. | Arthur is not perfect. | entailment |
Calvert is not jealous.
Ian is not small.
Calvert is not small.
Ian is not silly.
Calvert is not vivacious.
Chester is not jealous.
Chester is not concerned.
Marshall is not concerned.
Ian is not tremendous.
Roy is not jealous.
Roy is not vivacious.
Calvert is not concerned.If Marshall is not concerned, then Roy is silly, and vice versa.
If Chester is not silly and Marshall is vivacious, then Ian is not concerned.
If Calvert is vivacious, then Brock is tremendous and Roy is small, and vice versa.
If Brock is silly or Keegan is not small, then Chester is jealous.
All concerned people are silly.
If there is at least one people who is both not concerned and not jealous, then Chester is small.
If Ian is silly and Marshall is not small, then Calvert is concerned.
Someone is not vivacious and not concerned if and only if he is not small.
If there is nobody who is not not vivacious, then Brock is not tremendous.
If someone is not tremendous, then he is silly.
If someone is tremendous and concerned, then he is both not vivacious and silly, and vice versa.
If Chester is tremendous, then Keegan is small and Keegan is not vivacious. | Roy is tremendous. | entailment |
Calvert is not jealous.
Ian is not small.
Calvert is not small.
Ian is not silly.
Calvert is not vivacious.
Chester is not jealous.
Chester is not concerned.
Marshall is not concerned.
Ian is not tremendous.
Roy is not jealous.
Roy is not vivacious.
Calvert is not concerned.If Marshall is not concerned, then Roy is silly, and vice versa.
If Chester is not silly and Marshall is vivacious, then Ian is not concerned.
If Calvert is vivacious, then Brock is tremendous and Roy is small, and vice versa.
If Brock is silly or Keegan is not small, then Chester is jealous.
All concerned people are silly.
If there is at least one people who is both not concerned and not jealous, then Chester is small.
If Ian is silly and Marshall is not small, then Calvert is concerned.
Someone is not vivacious and not concerned if and only if he is not small.
If there is nobody who is not not vivacious, then Brock is not tremendous.
If someone is not tremendous, then he is silly.
If someone is tremendous and concerned, then he is both not vivacious and silly, and vice versa.
If Chester is tremendous, then Keegan is small and Keegan is not vivacious. | Ian is tremendous. | self_contradiction |
Calvert is not jealous.
Ian is not small.
Calvert is not small.
Ian is not silly.
Calvert is not vivacious.
Chester is not jealous.
Chester is not concerned.
Marshall is not concerned.
Ian is not tremendous.
Roy is not jealous.
Roy is not vivacious.
Calvert is not concerned.If Marshall is not concerned, then Roy is silly, and vice versa.
If Chester is not silly and Marshall is vivacious, then Ian is not concerned.
If Calvert is vivacious, then Brock is tremendous and Roy is small, and vice versa.
If Brock is silly or Keegan is not small, then Chester is jealous.
All concerned people are silly.
If there is at least one people who is both not concerned and not jealous, then Chester is small.
If Ian is silly and Marshall is not small, then Calvert is concerned.
Someone is not vivacious and not concerned if and only if he is not small.
If there is nobody who is not not vivacious, then Brock is not tremendous.
If someone is not tremendous, then he is silly.
If someone is tremendous and concerned, then he is both not vivacious and silly, and vice versa.
If Chester is tremendous, then Keegan is small and Keegan is not vivacious. | Roy is not tremendous. | contradiction |
Calvert is not jealous.
Ian is not small.
Calvert is not small.
Ian is not silly.
Calvert is not vivacious.
Chester is not jealous.
Chester is not concerned.
Marshall is not concerned.
Ian is not tremendous.
Roy is not jealous.
Roy is not vivacious.
Calvert is not concerned.If Marshall is not concerned, then Roy is silly, and vice versa.
If Chester is not silly and Marshall is vivacious, then Ian is not concerned.
If Calvert is vivacious, then Brock is tremendous and Roy is small, and vice versa.
If Brock is silly or Keegan is not small, then Chester is jealous.
All concerned people are silly.
If there is at least one people who is both not concerned and not jealous, then Chester is small.
If Ian is silly and Marshall is not small, then Calvert is concerned.
Someone is not vivacious and not concerned if and only if he is not small.
If there is nobody who is not not vivacious, then Brock is not tremendous.
If someone is not tremendous, then he is silly.
If someone is tremendous and concerned, then he is both not vivacious and silly, and vice versa.
If Chester is tremendous, then Keegan is small and Keegan is not vivacious. | Ian is jealous. | neutral |
Calvert is not jealous.
Ian is not small.
Calvert is not small.
Ian is not silly.
Calvert is not vivacious.
Chester is not jealous.
Chester is not concerned.
Marshall is not concerned.
Ian is not tremendous.
Roy is not jealous.
Roy is not vivacious.
Calvert is not concerned.If Marshall is not concerned, then Roy is silly, and vice versa.
If Chester is not silly and Marshall is vivacious, then Ian is not concerned.
If Calvert is vivacious, then Brock is tremendous and Roy is small, and vice versa.
If Brock is silly or Keegan is not small, then Chester is jealous.
All concerned people are silly.
If there is at least one people who is both not concerned and not jealous, then Chester is small.
If Ian is silly and Marshall is not small, then Calvert is concerned.
Someone is not vivacious and not concerned if and only if he is not small.
If there is nobody who is not not vivacious, then Brock is not tremendous.
If someone is not tremendous, then he is silly.
If someone is tremendous and concerned, then he is both not vivacious and silly, and vice versa.
If Chester is tremendous, then Keegan is small and Keegan is not vivacious. | Calvert is not vivacious. | entailment |
Calvert is not jealous.
Ian is not small.
Calvert is not small.
Ian is not silly.
Calvert is not vivacious.
Chester is not jealous.
Chester is not concerned.
Marshall is not concerned.
Ian is not tremendous.
Roy is not jealous.
Roy is not vivacious.
Calvert is not concerned.If Marshall is not concerned, then Roy is silly, and vice versa.
If Chester is not silly and Marshall is vivacious, then Ian is not concerned.
If Calvert is vivacious, then Brock is tremendous and Roy is small, and vice versa.
If Brock is silly or Keegan is not small, then Chester is jealous.
All concerned people are silly.
If there is at least one people who is both not concerned and not jealous, then Chester is small.
If Ian is silly and Marshall is not small, then Calvert is concerned.
Someone is not vivacious and not concerned if and only if he is not small.
If there is nobody who is not not vivacious, then Brock is not tremendous.
If someone is not tremendous, then he is silly.
If someone is tremendous and concerned, then he is both not vivacious and silly, and vice versa.
If Chester is tremendous, then Keegan is small and Keegan is not vivacious. | Brock is not small. | neutral |
Calvert is not jealous.
Ian is not small.
Calvert is not small.
Ian is not silly.
Calvert is not vivacious.
Chester is not jealous.
Chester is not concerned.
Marshall is not concerned.
Ian is not tremendous.
Roy is not jealous.
Roy is not vivacious.
Calvert is not concerned.If Marshall is not concerned, then Roy is silly, and vice versa.
If Chester is not silly and Marshall is vivacious, then Ian is not concerned.
If Calvert is vivacious, then Brock is tremendous and Roy is small, and vice versa.
If Brock is silly or Keegan is not small, then Chester is jealous.
All concerned people are silly.
If there is at least one people who is both not concerned and not jealous, then Chester is small.
If Ian is silly and Marshall is not small, then Calvert is concerned.
Someone is not vivacious and not concerned if and only if he is not small.
If there is nobody who is not not vivacious, then Brock is not tremendous.
If someone is not tremendous, then he is silly.
If someone is tremendous and concerned, then he is both not vivacious and silly, and vice versa.
If Chester is tremendous, then Keegan is small and Keegan is not vivacious. | Ian is small. | contradiction |
Calvert is not jealous.
Ian is not small.
Calvert is not small.
Ian is not silly.
Calvert is not vivacious.
Chester is not jealous.
Chester is not concerned.
Marshall is not concerned.
Ian is not tremendous.
Roy is not jealous.
Roy is not vivacious.
Calvert is not concerned.If Marshall is not concerned, then Roy is silly, and vice versa.
If Chester is not silly and Marshall is vivacious, then Ian is not concerned.
If Calvert is vivacious, then Brock is tremendous and Roy is small, and vice versa.
If Brock is silly or Keegan is not small, then Chester is jealous.
All concerned people are silly.
If there is at least one people who is both not concerned and not jealous, then Chester is small.
If Ian is silly and Marshall is not small, then Calvert is concerned.
Someone is not vivacious and not concerned if and only if he is not small.
If there is nobody who is not not vivacious, then Brock is not tremendous.
If someone is not tremendous, then he is silly.
If someone is tremendous and concerned, then he is both not vivacious and silly, and vice versa.
If Chester is tremendous, then Keegan is small and Keegan is not vivacious. | Marshall is concerned. | contradiction |
Calvert is not jealous.
Ian is not small.
Calvert is not small.
Ian is not silly.
Calvert is not vivacious.
Chester is not jealous.
Chester is not concerned.
Marshall is not concerned.
Ian is not tremendous.
Roy is not jealous.
Roy is not vivacious.
Calvert is not concerned.If Marshall is not concerned, then Roy is silly, and vice versa.
If Chester is not silly and Marshall is vivacious, then Ian is not concerned.
If Calvert is vivacious, then Brock is tremendous and Roy is small, and vice versa.
If Brock is silly or Keegan is not small, then Chester is jealous.
All concerned people are silly.
If there is at least one people who is both not concerned and not jealous, then Chester is small.
If Ian is silly and Marshall is not small, then Calvert is concerned.
Someone is not vivacious and not concerned if and only if he is not small.
If there is nobody who is not not vivacious, then Brock is not tremendous.
If someone is not tremendous, then he is silly.
If someone is tremendous and concerned, then he is both not vivacious and silly, and vice versa.
If Chester is tremendous, then Keegan is small and Keegan is not vivacious. | Chester is not tremendous. | neutral |
Calvert is not jealous.
Ian is not small.
Calvert is not small.
Ian is not silly.
Calvert is not vivacious.
Chester is not jealous.
Chester is not concerned.
Marshall is not concerned.
Ian is not tremendous.
Roy is not jealous.
Roy is not vivacious.
Calvert is not concerned.If Marshall is not concerned, then Roy is silly, and vice versa.
If Chester is not silly and Marshall is vivacious, then Ian is not concerned.
If Calvert is vivacious, then Brock is tremendous and Roy is small, and vice versa.
If Brock is silly or Keegan is not small, then Chester is jealous.
All concerned people are silly.
If there is at least one people who is both not concerned and not jealous, then Chester is small.
If Ian is silly and Marshall is not small, then Calvert is concerned.
Someone is not vivacious and not concerned if and only if he is not small.
If there is nobody who is not not vivacious, then Brock is not tremendous.
If someone is not tremendous, then he is silly.
If someone is tremendous and concerned, then he is both not vivacious and silly, and vice versa.
If Chester is tremendous, then Keegan is small and Keegan is not vivacious. | Ian is not concerned. | self_contradiction |
Calvert is not jealous.
Ian is not small.
Calvert is not small.
Ian is not silly.
Calvert is not vivacious.
Chester is not jealous.
Chester is not concerned.
Marshall is not concerned.
Ian is not tremendous.
Roy is not jealous.
Roy is not vivacious.
Calvert is not concerned.If Marshall is not concerned, then Roy is silly, and vice versa.
If Chester is not silly and Marshall is vivacious, then Ian is not concerned.
If Calvert is vivacious, then Brock is tremendous and Roy is small, and vice versa.
If Brock is silly or Keegan is not small, then Chester is jealous.
All concerned people are silly.
If there is at least one people who is both not concerned and not jealous, then Chester is small.
If Ian is silly and Marshall is not small, then Calvert is concerned.
Someone is not vivacious and not concerned if and only if he is not small.
If there is nobody who is not not vivacious, then Brock is not tremendous.
If someone is not tremendous, then he is silly.
If someone is tremendous and concerned, then he is both not vivacious and silly, and vice versa.
If Chester is tremendous, then Keegan is small and Keegan is not vivacious. | Keegan is not tremendous. | neutral |
Calvert is not jealous.
Ian is not small.
Calvert is not small.
Ian is not silly.
Calvert is not vivacious.
Chester is not jealous.
Chester is not concerned.
Marshall is not concerned.
Ian is not tremendous.
Roy is not jealous.
Roy is not vivacious.
Calvert is not concerned.If Marshall is not concerned, then Roy is silly, and vice versa.
If Chester is not silly and Marshall is vivacious, then Ian is not concerned.
If Calvert is vivacious, then Brock is tremendous and Roy is small, and vice versa.
If Brock is silly or Keegan is not small, then Chester is jealous.
All concerned people are silly.
If there is at least one people who is both not concerned and not jealous, then Chester is small.
If Ian is silly and Marshall is not small, then Calvert is concerned.
Someone is not vivacious and not concerned if and only if he is not small.
If there is nobody who is not not vivacious, then Brock is not tremendous.
If someone is not tremendous, then he is silly.
If someone is tremendous and concerned, then he is both not vivacious and silly, and vice versa.
If Chester is tremendous, then Keegan is small and Keegan is not vivacious. | Ian is silly. | self_contradiction |
Calvert is not jealous.
Ian is not small.
Calvert is not small.
Ian is not silly.
Calvert is not vivacious.
Chester is not jealous.
Chester is not concerned.
Marshall is not concerned.
Ian is not tremendous.
Roy is not jealous.
Roy is not vivacious.
Calvert is not concerned.If Marshall is not concerned, then Roy is silly, and vice versa.
If Chester is not silly and Marshall is vivacious, then Ian is not concerned.
If Calvert is vivacious, then Brock is tremendous and Roy is small, and vice versa.
If Brock is silly or Keegan is not small, then Chester is jealous.
All concerned people are silly.
If there is at least one people who is both not concerned and not jealous, then Chester is small.
If Ian is silly and Marshall is not small, then Calvert is concerned.
Someone is not vivacious and not concerned if and only if he is not small.
If there is nobody who is not not vivacious, then Brock is not tremendous.
If someone is not tremendous, then he is silly.
If someone is tremendous and concerned, then he is both not vivacious and silly, and vice versa.
If Chester is tremendous, then Keegan is small and Keegan is not vivacious. | Ian is vivacious. | contradiction |
Calvert is not jealous.
Ian is not small.
Calvert is not small.
Ian is not silly.
Calvert is not vivacious.
Chester is not jealous.
Chester is not concerned.
Marshall is not concerned.
Ian is not tremendous.
Roy is not jealous.
Roy is not vivacious.
Calvert is not concerned.If Marshall is not concerned, then Roy is silly, and vice versa.
If Chester is not silly and Marshall is vivacious, then Ian is not concerned.
If Calvert is vivacious, then Brock is tremendous and Roy is small, and vice versa.
If Brock is silly or Keegan is not small, then Chester is jealous.
All concerned people are silly.
If there is at least one people who is both not concerned and not jealous, then Chester is small.
If Ian is silly and Marshall is not small, then Calvert is concerned.
Someone is not vivacious and not concerned if and only if he is not small.
If there is nobody who is not not vivacious, then Brock is not tremendous.
If someone is not tremendous, then he is silly.
If someone is tremendous and concerned, then he is both not vivacious and silly, and vice versa.
If Chester is tremendous, then Keegan is small and Keegan is not vivacious. | Calvert is jealous. | contradiction |
Calvert is not jealous.
Ian is not small.
Calvert is not small.
Ian is not silly.
Calvert is not vivacious.
Chester is not jealous.
Chester is not concerned.
Marshall is not concerned.
Ian is not tremendous.
Roy is not jealous.
Roy is not vivacious.
Calvert is not concerned.If Marshall is not concerned, then Roy is silly, and vice versa.
If Chester is not silly and Marshall is vivacious, then Ian is not concerned.
If Calvert is vivacious, then Brock is tremendous and Roy is small, and vice versa.
If Brock is silly or Keegan is not small, then Chester is jealous.
All concerned people are silly.
If there is at least one people who is both not concerned and not jealous, then Chester is small.
If Ian is silly and Marshall is not small, then Calvert is concerned.
Someone is not vivacious and not concerned if and only if he is not small.
If there is nobody who is not not vivacious, then Brock is not tremendous.
If someone is not tremendous, then he is silly.
If someone is tremendous and concerned, then he is both not vivacious and silly, and vice versa.
If Chester is tremendous, then Keegan is small and Keegan is not vivacious. | Calvert is not jealous. | entailment |
Calvert is not jealous.
Ian is not small.
Calvert is not small.
Ian is not silly.
Calvert is not vivacious.
Chester is not jealous.
Chester is not concerned.
Marshall is not concerned.
Ian is not tremendous.
Roy is not jealous.
Roy is not vivacious.
Calvert is not concerned.If Marshall is not concerned, then Roy is silly, and vice versa.
If Chester is not silly and Marshall is vivacious, then Ian is not concerned.
If Calvert is vivacious, then Brock is tremendous and Roy is small, and vice versa.
If Brock is silly or Keegan is not small, then Chester is jealous.
All concerned people are silly.
If there is at least one people who is both not concerned and not jealous, then Chester is small.
If Ian is silly and Marshall is not small, then Calvert is concerned.
Someone is not vivacious and not concerned if and only if he is not small.
If there is nobody who is not not vivacious, then Brock is not tremendous.
If someone is not tremendous, then he is silly.
If someone is tremendous and concerned, then he is both not vivacious and silly, and vice versa.
If Chester is tremendous, then Keegan is small and Keegan is not vivacious. | Roy is silly. | entailment |
Calvert is not jealous.
Ian is not small.
Calvert is not small.
Ian is not silly.
Calvert is not vivacious.
Chester is not jealous.
Chester is not concerned.
Marshall is not concerned.
Ian is not tremendous.
Roy is not jealous.
Roy is not vivacious.
Calvert is not concerned.If Marshall is not concerned, then Roy is silly, and vice versa.
If Chester is not silly and Marshall is vivacious, then Ian is not concerned.
If Calvert is vivacious, then Brock is tremendous and Roy is small, and vice versa.
If Brock is silly or Keegan is not small, then Chester is jealous.
All concerned people are silly.
If there is at least one people who is both not concerned and not jealous, then Chester is small.
If Ian is silly and Marshall is not small, then Calvert is concerned.
Someone is not vivacious and not concerned if and only if he is not small.
If there is nobody who is not not vivacious, then Brock is not tremendous.
If someone is not tremendous, then he is silly.
If someone is tremendous and concerned, then he is both not vivacious and silly, and vice versa.
If Chester is tremendous, then Keegan is small and Keegan is not vivacious. | Ian is not silly. | self_contradiction |
Calvert is not jealous.
Ian is not small.
Calvert is not small.
Ian is not silly.
Calvert is not vivacious.
Chester is not jealous.
Chester is not concerned.
Marshall is not concerned.
Ian is not tremendous.
Roy is not jealous.
Roy is not vivacious.
Calvert is not concerned.If Marshall is not concerned, then Roy is silly, and vice versa.
If Chester is not silly and Marshall is vivacious, then Ian is not concerned.
If Calvert is vivacious, then Brock is tremendous and Roy is small, and vice versa.
If Brock is silly or Keegan is not small, then Chester is jealous.
All concerned people are silly.
If there is at least one people who is both not concerned and not jealous, then Chester is small.
If Ian is silly and Marshall is not small, then Calvert is concerned.
Someone is not vivacious and not concerned if and only if he is not small.
If there is nobody who is not not vivacious, then Brock is not tremendous.
If someone is not tremendous, then he is silly.
If someone is tremendous and concerned, then he is both not vivacious and silly, and vice versa.
If Chester is tremendous, then Keegan is small and Keegan is not vivacious. | Marshall is not jealous. | neutral |
Calvert is not jealous.
Ian is not small.
Calvert is not small.
Ian is not silly.
Calvert is not vivacious.
Chester is not jealous.
Chester is not concerned.
Marshall is not concerned.
Ian is not tremendous.
Roy is not jealous.
Roy is not vivacious.
Calvert is not concerned.If Marshall is not concerned, then Roy is silly, and vice versa.
If Chester is not silly and Marshall is vivacious, then Ian is not concerned.
If Calvert is vivacious, then Brock is tremendous and Roy is small, and vice versa.
If Brock is silly or Keegan is not small, then Chester is jealous.
All concerned people are silly.
If there is at least one people who is both not concerned and not jealous, then Chester is small.
If Ian is silly and Marshall is not small, then Calvert is concerned.
Someone is not vivacious and not concerned if and only if he is not small.
If there is nobody who is not not vivacious, then Brock is not tremendous.
If someone is not tremendous, then he is silly.
If someone is tremendous and concerned, then he is both not vivacious and silly, and vice versa.
If Chester is tremendous, then Keegan is small and Keegan is not vivacious. | Ian is not tremendous. | self_contradiction |
Calvert is not jealous.
Ian is not small.
Calvert is not small.
Ian is not silly.
Calvert is not vivacious.
Chester is not jealous.
Chester is not concerned.
Marshall is not concerned.
Ian is not tremendous.
Roy is not jealous.
Roy is not vivacious.
Calvert is not concerned.If Marshall is not concerned, then Roy is silly, and vice versa.
If Chester is not silly and Marshall is vivacious, then Ian is not concerned.
If Calvert is vivacious, then Brock is tremendous and Roy is small, and vice versa.
If Brock is silly or Keegan is not small, then Chester is jealous.
All concerned people are silly.
If there is at least one people who is both not concerned and not jealous, then Chester is small.
If Ian is silly and Marshall is not small, then Calvert is concerned.
Someone is not vivacious and not concerned if and only if he is not small.
If there is nobody who is not not vivacious, then Brock is not tremendous.
If someone is not tremendous, then he is silly.
If someone is tremendous and concerned, then he is both not vivacious and silly, and vice versa.
If Chester is tremendous, then Keegan is small and Keegan is not vivacious. | Chester is not jealous. | entailment |
Lester is not hurt.
Arthur is helpful.
Greyson is helpful.
Arthur is electrical.
Bruno is not entire.
Greyson is not electrical.
Bruno is aggressive.
Arthur is not aggressive.
Kelvin is not successful.
Everett is hurt.
Lester is entire.
Bruno is successful.If all people are not hurt or not aggressive, then Greyson is helpful.
If Everett is not hurt, then Roy is not electrical.
Someone who is both not hurt and not entire is always successful.
If there is someone who is either aggressive or not helpful, then Bruno is entire.
Someone being not entire is equivalent to being not successful.
If there is someone who is either successful or aggressive, then Bruno is not hurt.
If there is at least one people who is not electrical or aggressive, then Lester is helpful.
If someone is electrical and not aggressive, then he is both not helpful and not hurt, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not successful and not electrical, then Everett is helpful.
Bruno being not electrical implies that Kelvin is aggressive.
If someone is either not helpful or not aggressive, then he is not electrical and entire.
Kelvin being aggressive implies that Bruno is helpful and Greyson is successful. | Arthur is not helpful. | self_contradiction |
Lester is not hurt.
Arthur is helpful.
Greyson is helpful.
Arthur is electrical.
Bruno is not entire.
Greyson is not electrical.
Bruno is aggressive.
Arthur is not aggressive.
Kelvin is not successful.
Everett is hurt.
Lester is entire.
Bruno is successful.If all people are not hurt or not aggressive, then Greyson is helpful.
If Everett is not hurt, then Roy is not electrical.
Someone who is both not hurt and not entire is always successful.
If there is someone who is either aggressive or not helpful, then Bruno is entire.
Someone being not entire is equivalent to being not successful.
If there is someone who is either successful or aggressive, then Bruno is not hurt.
If there is at least one people who is not electrical or aggressive, then Lester is helpful.
If someone is electrical and not aggressive, then he is both not helpful and not hurt, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not successful and not electrical, then Everett is helpful.
Bruno being not electrical implies that Kelvin is aggressive.
If someone is either not helpful or not aggressive, then he is not electrical and entire.
Kelvin being aggressive implies that Bruno is helpful and Greyson is successful. | Kelvin is not hurt. | neutral |
Lester is not hurt.
Arthur is helpful.
Greyson is helpful.
Arthur is electrical.
Bruno is not entire.
Greyson is not electrical.
Bruno is aggressive.
Arthur is not aggressive.
Kelvin is not successful.
Everett is hurt.
Lester is entire.
Bruno is successful.If all people are not hurt or not aggressive, then Greyson is helpful.
If Everett is not hurt, then Roy is not electrical.
Someone who is both not hurt and not entire is always successful.
If there is someone who is either aggressive or not helpful, then Bruno is entire.
Someone being not entire is equivalent to being not successful.
If there is someone who is either successful or aggressive, then Bruno is not hurt.
If there is at least one people who is not electrical or aggressive, then Lester is helpful.
If someone is electrical and not aggressive, then he is both not helpful and not hurt, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not successful and not electrical, then Everett is helpful.
Bruno being not electrical implies that Kelvin is aggressive.
If someone is either not helpful or not aggressive, then he is not electrical and entire.
Kelvin being aggressive implies that Bruno is helpful and Greyson is successful. | Arthur is not aggressive. | entailment |
Lester is not hurt.
Arthur is helpful.
Greyson is helpful.
Arthur is electrical.
Bruno is not entire.
Greyson is not electrical.
Bruno is aggressive.
Arthur is not aggressive.
Kelvin is not successful.
Everett is hurt.
Lester is entire.
Bruno is successful.If all people are not hurt or not aggressive, then Greyson is helpful.
If Everett is not hurt, then Roy is not electrical.
Someone who is both not hurt and not entire is always successful.
If there is someone who is either aggressive or not helpful, then Bruno is entire.
Someone being not entire is equivalent to being not successful.
If there is someone who is either successful or aggressive, then Bruno is not hurt.
If there is at least one people who is not electrical or aggressive, then Lester is helpful.
If someone is electrical and not aggressive, then he is both not helpful and not hurt, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not successful and not electrical, then Everett is helpful.
Bruno being not electrical implies that Kelvin is aggressive.
If someone is either not helpful or not aggressive, then he is not electrical and entire.
Kelvin being aggressive implies that Bruno is helpful and Greyson is successful. | Everett is hurt. | entailment |
Lester is not hurt.
Arthur is helpful.
Greyson is helpful.
Arthur is electrical.
Bruno is not entire.
Greyson is not electrical.
Bruno is aggressive.
Arthur is not aggressive.
Kelvin is not successful.
Everett is hurt.
Lester is entire.
Bruno is successful.If all people are not hurt or not aggressive, then Greyson is helpful.
If Everett is not hurt, then Roy is not electrical.
Someone who is both not hurt and not entire is always successful.
If there is someone who is either aggressive or not helpful, then Bruno is entire.
Someone being not entire is equivalent to being not successful.
If there is someone who is either successful or aggressive, then Bruno is not hurt.
If there is at least one people who is not electrical or aggressive, then Lester is helpful.
If someone is electrical and not aggressive, then he is both not helpful and not hurt, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not successful and not electrical, then Everett is helpful.
Bruno being not electrical implies that Kelvin is aggressive.
If someone is either not helpful or not aggressive, then he is not electrical and entire.
Kelvin being aggressive implies that Bruno is helpful and Greyson is successful. | Bruno is not entire. | self_contradiction |
Lester is not hurt.
Arthur is helpful.
Greyson is helpful.
Arthur is electrical.
Bruno is not entire.
Greyson is not electrical.
Bruno is aggressive.
Arthur is not aggressive.
Kelvin is not successful.
Everett is hurt.
Lester is entire.
Bruno is successful.If all people are not hurt or not aggressive, then Greyson is helpful.
If Everett is not hurt, then Roy is not electrical.
Someone who is both not hurt and not entire is always successful.
If there is someone who is either aggressive or not helpful, then Bruno is entire.
Someone being not entire is equivalent to being not successful.
If there is someone who is either successful or aggressive, then Bruno is not hurt.
If there is at least one people who is not electrical or aggressive, then Lester is helpful.
If someone is electrical and not aggressive, then he is both not helpful and not hurt, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not successful and not electrical, then Everett is helpful.
Bruno being not electrical implies that Kelvin is aggressive.
If someone is either not helpful or not aggressive, then he is not electrical and entire.
Kelvin being aggressive implies that Bruno is helpful and Greyson is successful. | Kelvin is successful. | contradiction |
Lester is not hurt.
Arthur is helpful.
Greyson is helpful.
Arthur is electrical.
Bruno is not entire.
Greyson is not electrical.
Bruno is aggressive.
Arthur is not aggressive.
Kelvin is not successful.
Everett is hurt.
Lester is entire.
Bruno is successful.If all people are not hurt or not aggressive, then Greyson is helpful.
If Everett is not hurt, then Roy is not electrical.
Someone who is both not hurt and not entire is always successful.
If there is someone who is either aggressive or not helpful, then Bruno is entire.
Someone being not entire is equivalent to being not successful.
If there is someone who is either successful or aggressive, then Bruno is not hurt.
If there is at least one people who is not electrical or aggressive, then Lester is helpful.
If someone is electrical and not aggressive, then he is both not helpful and not hurt, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not successful and not electrical, then Everett is helpful.
Bruno being not electrical implies that Kelvin is aggressive.
If someone is either not helpful or not aggressive, then he is not electrical and entire.
Kelvin being aggressive implies that Bruno is helpful and Greyson is successful. | Arthur is not successful. | neutral |
Lester is not hurt.
Arthur is helpful.
Greyson is helpful.
Arthur is electrical.
Bruno is not entire.
Greyson is not electrical.
Bruno is aggressive.
Arthur is not aggressive.
Kelvin is not successful.
Everett is hurt.
Lester is entire.
Bruno is successful.If all people are not hurt or not aggressive, then Greyson is helpful.
If Everett is not hurt, then Roy is not electrical.
Someone who is both not hurt and not entire is always successful.
If there is someone who is either aggressive or not helpful, then Bruno is entire.
Someone being not entire is equivalent to being not successful.
If there is someone who is either successful or aggressive, then Bruno is not hurt.
If there is at least one people who is not electrical or aggressive, then Lester is helpful.
If someone is electrical and not aggressive, then he is both not helpful and not hurt, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not successful and not electrical, then Everett is helpful.
Bruno being not electrical implies that Kelvin is aggressive.
If someone is either not helpful or not aggressive, then he is not electrical and entire.
Kelvin being aggressive implies that Bruno is helpful and Greyson is successful. | Arthur is helpful. | self_contradiction |
Lester is not hurt.
Arthur is helpful.
Greyson is helpful.
Arthur is electrical.
Bruno is not entire.
Greyson is not electrical.
Bruno is aggressive.
Arthur is not aggressive.
Kelvin is not successful.
Everett is hurt.
Lester is entire.
Bruno is successful.If all people are not hurt or not aggressive, then Greyson is helpful.
If Everett is not hurt, then Roy is not electrical.
Someone who is both not hurt and not entire is always successful.
If there is someone who is either aggressive or not helpful, then Bruno is entire.
Someone being not entire is equivalent to being not successful.
If there is someone who is either successful or aggressive, then Bruno is not hurt.
If there is at least one people who is not electrical or aggressive, then Lester is helpful.
If someone is electrical and not aggressive, then he is both not helpful and not hurt, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not successful and not electrical, then Everett is helpful.
Bruno being not electrical implies that Kelvin is aggressive.
If someone is either not helpful or not aggressive, then he is not electrical and entire.
Kelvin being aggressive implies that Bruno is helpful and Greyson is successful. | Greyson is not helpful. | contradiction |
Lester is not hurt.
Arthur is helpful.
Greyson is helpful.
Arthur is electrical.
Bruno is not entire.
Greyson is not electrical.
Bruno is aggressive.
Arthur is not aggressive.
Kelvin is not successful.
Everett is hurt.
Lester is entire.
Bruno is successful.If all people are not hurt or not aggressive, then Greyson is helpful.
If Everett is not hurt, then Roy is not electrical.
Someone who is both not hurt and not entire is always successful.
If there is someone who is either aggressive or not helpful, then Bruno is entire.
Someone being not entire is equivalent to being not successful.
If there is someone who is either successful or aggressive, then Bruno is not hurt.
If there is at least one people who is not electrical or aggressive, then Lester is helpful.
If someone is electrical and not aggressive, then he is both not helpful and not hurt, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not successful and not electrical, then Everett is helpful.
Bruno being not electrical implies that Kelvin is aggressive.
If someone is either not helpful or not aggressive, then he is not electrical and entire.
Kelvin being aggressive implies that Bruno is helpful and Greyson is successful. | Everett is electrical. | neutral |
Lester is not hurt.
Arthur is helpful.
Greyson is helpful.
Arthur is electrical.
Bruno is not entire.
Greyson is not electrical.
Bruno is aggressive.
Arthur is not aggressive.
Kelvin is not successful.
Everett is hurt.
Lester is entire.
Bruno is successful.If all people are not hurt or not aggressive, then Greyson is helpful.
If Everett is not hurt, then Roy is not electrical.
Someone who is both not hurt and not entire is always successful.
If there is someone who is either aggressive or not helpful, then Bruno is entire.
Someone being not entire is equivalent to being not successful.
If there is someone who is either successful or aggressive, then Bruno is not hurt.
If there is at least one people who is not electrical or aggressive, then Lester is helpful.
If someone is electrical and not aggressive, then he is both not helpful and not hurt, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not successful and not electrical, then Everett is helpful.
Bruno being not electrical implies that Kelvin is aggressive.
If someone is either not helpful or not aggressive, then he is not electrical and entire.
Kelvin being aggressive implies that Bruno is helpful and Greyson is successful. | Greyson is helpful. | entailment |
Lester is not hurt.
Arthur is helpful.
Greyson is helpful.
Arthur is electrical.
Bruno is not entire.
Greyson is not electrical.
Bruno is aggressive.
Arthur is not aggressive.
Kelvin is not successful.
Everett is hurt.
Lester is entire.
Bruno is successful.If all people are not hurt or not aggressive, then Greyson is helpful.
If Everett is not hurt, then Roy is not electrical.
Someone who is both not hurt and not entire is always successful.
If there is someone who is either aggressive or not helpful, then Bruno is entire.
Someone being not entire is equivalent to being not successful.
If there is someone who is either successful or aggressive, then Bruno is not hurt.
If there is at least one people who is not electrical or aggressive, then Lester is helpful.
If someone is electrical and not aggressive, then he is both not helpful and not hurt, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not successful and not electrical, then Everett is helpful.
Bruno being not electrical implies that Kelvin is aggressive.
If someone is either not helpful or not aggressive, then he is not electrical and entire.
Kelvin being aggressive implies that Bruno is helpful and Greyson is successful. | Arthur is electrical. | self_contradiction |
Lester is not hurt.
Arthur is helpful.
Greyson is helpful.
Arthur is electrical.
Bruno is not entire.
Greyson is not electrical.
Bruno is aggressive.
Arthur is not aggressive.
Kelvin is not successful.
Everett is hurt.
Lester is entire.
Bruno is successful.If all people are not hurt or not aggressive, then Greyson is helpful.
If Everett is not hurt, then Roy is not electrical.
Someone who is both not hurt and not entire is always successful.
If there is someone who is either aggressive or not helpful, then Bruno is entire.
Someone being not entire is equivalent to being not successful.
If there is someone who is either successful or aggressive, then Bruno is not hurt.
If there is at least one people who is not electrical or aggressive, then Lester is helpful.
If someone is electrical and not aggressive, then he is both not helpful and not hurt, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not successful and not electrical, then Everett is helpful.
Bruno being not electrical implies that Kelvin is aggressive.
If someone is either not helpful or not aggressive, then he is not electrical and entire.
Kelvin being aggressive implies that Bruno is helpful and Greyson is successful. | Lester is entire. | entailment |
Lester is not hurt.
Arthur is helpful.
Greyson is helpful.
Arthur is electrical.
Bruno is not entire.
Greyson is not electrical.
Bruno is aggressive.
Arthur is not aggressive.
Kelvin is not successful.
Everett is hurt.
Lester is entire.
Bruno is successful.If all people are not hurt or not aggressive, then Greyson is helpful.
If Everett is not hurt, then Roy is not electrical.
Someone who is both not hurt and not entire is always successful.
If there is someone who is either aggressive or not helpful, then Bruno is entire.
Someone being not entire is equivalent to being not successful.
If there is someone who is either successful or aggressive, then Bruno is not hurt.
If there is at least one people who is not electrical or aggressive, then Lester is helpful.
If someone is electrical and not aggressive, then he is both not helpful and not hurt, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not successful and not electrical, then Everett is helpful.
Bruno being not electrical implies that Kelvin is aggressive.
If someone is either not helpful or not aggressive, then he is not electrical and entire.
Kelvin being aggressive implies that Bruno is helpful and Greyson is successful. | Arthur is not hurt. | entailment |
Lester is not hurt.
Arthur is helpful.
Greyson is helpful.
Arthur is electrical.
Bruno is not entire.
Greyson is not electrical.
Bruno is aggressive.
Arthur is not aggressive.
Kelvin is not successful.
Everett is hurt.
Lester is entire.
Bruno is successful.If all people are not hurt or not aggressive, then Greyson is helpful.
If Everett is not hurt, then Roy is not electrical.
Someone who is both not hurt and not entire is always successful.
If there is someone who is either aggressive or not helpful, then Bruno is entire.
Someone being not entire is equivalent to being not successful.
If there is someone who is either successful or aggressive, then Bruno is not hurt.
If there is at least one people who is not electrical or aggressive, then Lester is helpful.
If someone is electrical and not aggressive, then he is both not helpful and not hurt, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not successful and not electrical, then Everett is helpful.
Bruno being not electrical implies that Kelvin is aggressive.
If someone is either not helpful or not aggressive, then he is not electrical and entire.
Kelvin being aggressive implies that Bruno is helpful and Greyson is successful. | Kelvin is not aggressive. | neutral |
Lester is not hurt.
Arthur is helpful.
Greyson is helpful.
Arthur is electrical.
Bruno is not entire.
Greyson is not electrical.
Bruno is aggressive.
Arthur is not aggressive.
Kelvin is not successful.
Everett is hurt.
Lester is entire.
Bruno is successful.If all people are not hurt or not aggressive, then Greyson is helpful.
If Everett is not hurt, then Roy is not electrical.
Someone who is both not hurt and not entire is always successful.
If there is someone who is either aggressive or not helpful, then Bruno is entire.
Someone being not entire is equivalent to being not successful.
If there is someone who is either successful or aggressive, then Bruno is not hurt.
If there is at least one people who is not electrical or aggressive, then Lester is helpful.
If someone is electrical and not aggressive, then he is both not helpful and not hurt, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not successful and not electrical, then Everett is helpful.
Bruno being not electrical implies that Kelvin is aggressive.
If someone is either not helpful or not aggressive, then he is not electrical and entire.
Kelvin being aggressive implies that Bruno is helpful and Greyson is successful. | Arthur is hurt. | contradiction |
Lester is not hurt.
Arthur is helpful.
Greyson is helpful.
Arthur is electrical.
Bruno is not entire.
Greyson is not electrical.
Bruno is aggressive.
Arthur is not aggressive.
Kelvin is not successful.
Everett is hurt.
Lester is entire.
Bruno is successful.If all people are not hurt or not aggressive, then Greyson is helpful.
If Everett is not hurt, then Roy is not electrical.
Someone who is both not hurt and not entire is always successful.
If there is someone who is either aggressive or not helpful, then Bruno is entire.
Someone being not entire is equivalent to being not successful.
If there is someone who is either successful or aggressive, then Bruno is not hurt.
If there is at least one people who is not electrical or aggressive, then Lester is helpful.
If someone is electrical and not aggressive, then he is both not helpful and not hurt, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not successful and not electrical, then Everett is helpful.
Bruno being not electrical implies that Kelvin is aggressive.
If someone is either not helpful or not aggressive, then he is not electrical and entire.
Kelvin being aggressive implies that Bruno is helpful and Greyson is successful. | Greyson is electrical. | contradiction |
Lester is not hurt.
Arthur is helpful.
Greyson is helpful.
Arthur is electrical.
Bruno is not entire.
Greyson is not electrical.
Bruno is aggressive.
Arthur is not aggressive.
Kelvin is not successful.
Everett is hurt.
Lester is entire.
Bruno is successful.If all people are not hurt or not aggressive, then Greyson is helpful.
If Everett is not hurt, then Roy is not electrical.
Someone who is both not hurt and not entire is always successful.
If there is someone who is either aggressive or not helpful, then Bruno is entire.
Someone being not entire is equivalent to being not successful.
If there is someone who is either successful or aggressive, then Bruno is not hurt.
If there is at least one people who is not electrical or aggressive, then Lester is helpful.
If someone is electrical and not aggressive, then he is both not helpful and not hurt, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not successful and not electrical, then Everett is helpful.
Bruno being not electrical implies that Kelvin is aggressive.
If someone is either not helpful or not aggressive, then he is not electrical and entire.
Kelvin being aggressive implies that Bruno is helpful and Greyson is successful. | Kelvin is helpful. | neutral |
Lester is not hurt.
Arthur is helpful.
Greyson is helpful.
Arthur is electrical.
Bruno is not entire.
Greyson is not electrical.
Bruno is aggressive.
Arthur is not aggressive.
Kelvin is not successful.
Everett is hurt.
Lester is entire.
Bruno is successful.If all people are not hurt or not aggressive, then Greyson is helpful.
If Everett is not hurt, then Roy is not electrical.
Someone who is both not hurt and not entire is always successful.
If there is someone who is either aggressive or not helpful, then Bruno is entire.
Someone being not entire is equivalent to being not successful.
If there is someone who is either successful or aggressive, then Bruno is not hurt.
If there is at least one people who is not electrical or aggressive, then Lester is helpful.
If someone is electrical and not aggressive, then he is both not helpful and not hurt, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not successful and not electrical, then Everett is helpful.
Bruno being not electrical implies that Kelvin is aggressive.
If someone is either not helpful or not aggressive, then he is not electrical and entire.
Kelvin being aggressive implies that Bruno is helpful and Greyson is successful. | Bruno is hurt. | contradiction |
Lester is not hurt.
Arthur is helpful.
Greyson is helpful.
Arthur is electrical.
Bruno is not entire.
Greyson is not electrical.
Bruno is aggressive.
Arthur is not aggressive.
Kelvin is not successful.
Everett is hurt.
Lester is entire.
Bruno is successful.If all people are not hurt or not aggressive, then Greyson is helpful.
If Everett is not hurt, then Roy is not electrical.
Someone who is both not hurt and not entire is always successful.
If there is someone who is either aggressive or not helpful, then Bruno is entire.
Someone being not entire is equivalent to being not successful.
If there is someone who is either successful or aggressive, then Bruno is not hurt.
If there is at least one people who is not electrical or aggressive, then Lester is helpful.
If someone is electrical and not aggressive, then he is both not helpful and not hurt, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not successful and not electrical, then Everett is helpful.
Bruno being not electrical implies that Kelvin is aggressive.
If someone is either not helpful or not aggressive, then he is not electrical and entire.
Kelvin being aggressive implies that Bruno is helpful and Greyson is successful. | Bruno is successful. | self_contradiction |
Rosie is wooden.
Hope is wooden.
Tony is not smoggy.
Sterling is not wooden.
Tony is not strange.
Justin is wooden.
Jarvis is not humorous.
Sterling is humorous.
Justin is humorous.
Tony is not humorous.
Rosie is smoggy.
Hall is terrible.Hope being not terrible and Tony being not humorous imply that Tony is available.
If Hall is not smoggy and Rosie is humorous, then Justin is not wooden and Rosie is terrible, and vice versa.
Someone being not smoggy is equivalent to being not humorous.
Jarvis being wooden is equivalent to Sterling being terrible and Sterling being not available.
Someone is terrible and smoggy if and only if he is not strange and not wooden.
All not wooden people are not smoggy.
If someone is not wooden or he is smoggy, then he is not available.
Someone is not smoggy and not humorous if and only if he is available.
If Hope is not strange or Tony is not smoggy, then Jarvis is wooden.
All terrible people are not strange.
All humorous people are strange.
If someone is not humorous, then he is wooden. | Sterling is smoggy. | self_contradiction |
Rosie is wooden.
Hope is wooden.
Tony is not smoggy.
Sterling is not wooden.
Tony is not strange.
Justin is wooden.
Jarvis is not humorous.
Sterling is humorous.
Justin is humorous.
Tony is not humorous.
Rosie is smoggy.
Hall is terrible.Hope being not terrible and Tony being not humorous imply that Tony is available.
If Hall is not smoggy and Rosie is humorous, then Justin is not wooden and Rosie is terrible, and vice versa.
Someone being not smoggy is equivalent to being not humorous.
Jarvis being wooden is equivalent to Sterling being terrible and Sterling being not available.
Someone is terrible and smoggy if and only if he is not strange and not wooden.
All not wooden people are not smoggy.
If someone is not wooden or he is smoggy, then he is not available.
Someone is not smoggy and not humorous if and only if he is available.
If Hope is not strange or Tony is not smoggy, then Jarvis is wooden.
All terrible people are not strange.
All humorous people are strange.
If someone is not humorous, then he is wooden. | Tony is not smoggy. | entailment |
Rosie is wooden.
Hope is wooden.
Tony is not smoggy.
Sterling is not wooden.
Tony is not strange.
Justin is wooden.
Jarvis is not humorous.
Sterling is humorous.
Justin is humorous.
Tony is not humorous.
Rosie is smoggy.
Hall is terrible.Hope being not terrible and Tony being not humorous imply that Tony is available.
If Hall is not smoggy and Rosie is humorous, then Justin is not wooden and Rosie is terrible, and vice versa.
Someone being not smoggy is equivalent to being not humorous.
Jarvis being wooden is equivalent to Sterling being terrible and Sterling being not available.
Someone is terrible and smoggy if and only if he is not strange and not wooden.
All not wooden people are not smoggy.
If someone is not wooden or he is smoggy, then he is not available.
Someone is not smoggy and not humorous if and only if he is available.
If Hope is not strange or Tony is not smoggy, then Jarvis is wooden.
All terrible people are not strange.
All humorous people are strange.
If someone is not humorous, then he is wooden. | Rosie is available. | contradiction |
Rosie is wooden.
Hope is wooden.
Tony is not smoggy.
Sterling is not wooden.
Tony is not strange.
Justin is wooden.
Jarvis is not humorous.
Sterling is humorous.
Justin is humorous.
Tony is not humorous.
Rosie is smoggy.
Hall is terrible.Hope being not terrible and Tony being not humorous imply that Tony is available.
If Hall is not smoggy and Rosie is humorous, then Justin is not wooden and Rosie is terrible, and vice versa.
Someone being not smoggy is equivalent to being not humorous.
Jarvis being wooden is equivalent to Sterling being terrible and Sterling being not available.
Someone is terrible and smoggy if and only if he is not strange and not wooden.
All not wooden people are not smoggy.
If someone is not wooden or he is smoggy, then he is not available.
Someone is not smoggy and not humorous if and only if he is available.
If Hope is not strange or Tony is not smoggy, then Jarvis is wooden.
All terrible people are not strange.
All humorous people are strange.
If someone is not humorous, then he is wooden. | Tony is not strange. | entailment |
Rosie is wooden.
Hope is wooden.
Tony is not smoggy.
Sterling is not wooden.
Tony is not strange.
Justin is wooden.
Jarvis is not humorous.
Sterling is humorous.
Justin is humorous.
Tony is not humorous.
Rosie is smoggy.
Hall is terrible.Hope being not terrible and Tony being not humorous imply that Tony is available.
If Hall is not smoggy and Rosie is humorous, then Justin is not wooden and Rosie is terrible, and vice versa.
Someone being not smoggy is equivalent to being not humorous.
Jarvis being wooden is equivalent to Sterling being terrible and Sterling being not available.
Someone is terrible and smoggy if and only if he is not strange and not wooden.
All not wooden people are not smoggy.
If someone is not wooden or he is smoggy, then he is not available.
Someone is not smoggy and not humorous if and only if he is available.
If Hope is not strange or Tony is not smoggy, then Jarvis is wooden.
All terrible people are not strange.
All humorous people are strange.
If someone is not humorous, then he is wooden. | Tony is strange. | contradiction |
Rosie is wooden.
Hope is wooden.
Tony is not smoggy.
Sterling is not wooden.
Tony is not strange.
Justin is wooden.
Jarvis is not humorous.
Sterling is humorous.
Justin is humorous.
Tony is not humorous.
Rosie is smoggy.
Hall is terrible.Hope being not terrible and Tony being not humorous imply that Tony is available.
If Hall is not smoggy and Rosie is humorous, then Justin is not wooden and Rosie is terrible, and vice versa.
Someone being not smoggy is equivalent to being not humorous.
Jarvis being wooden is equivalent to Sterling being terrible and Sterling being not available.
Someone is terrible and smoggy if and only if he is not strange and not wooden.
All not wooden people are not smoggy.
If someone is not wooden or he is smoggy, then he is not available.
Someone is not smoggy and not humorous if and only if he is available.
If Hope is not strange or Tony is not smoggy, then Jarvis is wooden.
All terrible people are not strange.
All humorous people are strange.
If someone is not humorous, then he is wooden. | Sterling is humorous. | self_contradiction |
Rosie is wooden.
Hope is wooden.
Tony is not smoggy.
Sterling is not wooden.
Tony is not strange.
Justin is wooden.
Jarvis is not humorous.
Sterling is humorous.
Justin is humorous.
Tony is not humorous.
Rosie is smoggy.
Hall is terrible.Hope being not terrible and Tony being not humorous imply that Tony is available.
If Hall is not smoggy and Rosie is humorous, then Justin is not wooden and Rosie is terrible, and vice versa.
Someone being not smoggy is equivalent to being not humorous.
Jarvis being wooden is equivalent to Sterling being terrible and Sterling being not available.
Someone is terrible and smoggy if and only if he is not strange and not wooden.
All not wooden people are not smoggy.
If someone is not wooden or he is smoggy, then he is not available.
Someone is not smoggy and not humorous if and only if he is available.
If Hope is not strange or Tony is not smoggy, then Jarvis is wooden.
All terrible people are not strange.
All humorous people are strange.
If someone is not humorous, then he is wooden. | Jarvis is humorous. | contradiction |
Rosie is wooden.
Hope is wooden.
Tony is not smoggy.
Sterling is not wooden.
Tony is not strange.
Justin is wooden.
Jarvis is not humorous.
Sterling is humorous.
Justin is humorous.
Tony is not humorous.
Rosie is smoggy.
Hall is terrible.Hope being not terrible and Tony being not humorous imply that Tony is available.
If Hall is not smoggy and Rosie is humorous, then Justin is not wooden and Rosie is terrible, and vice versa.
Someone being not smoggy is equivalent to being not humorous.
Jarvis being wooden is equivalent to Sterling being terrible and Sterling being not available.
Someone is terrible and smoggy if and only if he is not strange and not wooden.
All not wooden people are not smoggy.
If someone is not wooden or he is smoggy, then he is not available.
Someone is not smoggy and not humorous if and only if he is available.
If Hope is not strange or Tony is not smoggy, then Jarvis is wooden.
All terrible people are not strange.
All humorous people are strange.
If someone is not humorous, then he is wooden. | Jarvis is not humorous. | entailment |
Rosie is wooden.
Hope is wooden.
Tony is not smoggy.
Sterling is not wooden.
Tony is not strange.
Justin is wooden.
Jarvis is not humorous.
Sterling is humorous.
Justin is humorous.
Tony is not humorous.
Rosie is smoggy.
Hall is terrible.Hope being not terrible and Tony being not humorous imply that Tony is available.
If Hall is not smoggy and Rosie is humorous, then Justin is not wooden and Rosie is terrible, and vice versa.
Someone being not smoggy is equivalent to being not humorous.
Jarvis being wooden is equivalent to Sterling being terrible and Sterling being not available.
Someone is terrible and smoggy if and only if he is not strange and not wooden.
All not wooden people are not smoggy.
If someone is not wooden or he is smoggy, then he is not available.
Someone is not smoggy and not humorous if and only if he is available.
If Hope is not strange or Tony is not smoggy, then Jarvis is wooden.
All terrible people are not strange.
All humorous people are strange.
If someone is not humorous, then he is wooden. | Sterling is available. | self_contradiction |
Rosie is wooden.
Hope is wooden.
Tony is not smoggy.
Sterling is not wooden.
Tony is not strange.
Justin is wooden.
Jarvis is not humorous.
Sterling is humorous.
Justin is humorous.
Tony is not humorous.
Rosie is smoggy.
Hall is terrible.Hope being not terrible and Tony being not humorous imply that Tony is available.
If Hall is not smoggy and Rosie is humorous, then Justin is not wooden and Rosie is terrible, and vice versa.
Someone being not smoggy is equivalent to being not humorous.
Jarvis being wooden is equivalent to Sterling being terrible and Sterling being not available.
Someone is terrible and smoggy if and only if he is not strange and not wooden.
All not wooden people are not smoggy.
If someone is not wooden or he is smoggy, then he is not available.
Someone is not smoggy and not humorous if and only if he is available.
If Hope is not strange or Tony is not smoggy, then Jarvis is wooden.
All terrible people are not strange.
All humorous people are strange.
If someone is not humorous, then he is wooden. | Tony is not available. | contradiction |
Rosie is wooden.
Hope is wooden.
Tony is not smoggy.
Sterling is not wooden.
Tony is not strange.
Justin is wooden.
Jarvis is not humorous.
Sterling is humorous.
Justin is humorous.
Tony is not humorous.
Rosie is smoggy.
Hall is terrible.Hope being not terrible and Tony being not humorous imply that Tony is available.
If Hall is not smoggy and Rosie is humorous, then Justin is not wooden and Rosie is terrible, and vice versa.
Someone being not smoggy is equivalent to being not humorous.
Jarvis being wooden is equivalent to Sterling being terrible and Sterling being not available.
Someone is terrible and smoggy if and only if he is not strange and not wooden.
All not wooden people are not smoggy.
If someone is not wooden or he is smoggy, then he is not available.
Someone is not smoggy and not humorous if and only if he is available.
If Hope is not strange or Tony is not smoggy, then Jarvis is wooden.
All terrible people are not strange.
All humorous people are strange.
If someone is not humorous, then he is wooden. | Sterling is wooden. | self_contradiction |
Rosie is wooden.
Hope is wooden.
Tony is not smoggy.
Sterling is not wooden.
Tony is not strange.
Justin is wooden.
Jarvis is not humorous.
Sterling is humorous.
Justin is humorous.
Tony is not humorous.
Rosie is smoggy.
Hall is terrible.Hope being not terrible and Tony being not humorous imply that Tony is available.
If Hall is not smoggy and Rosie is humorous, then Justin is not wooden and Rosie is terrible, and vice versa.
Someone being not smoggy is equivalent to being not humorous.
Jarvis being wooden is equivalent to Sterling being terrible and Sterling being not available.
Someone is terrible and smoggy if and only if he is not strange and not wooden.
All not wooden people are not smoggy.
If someone is not wooden or he is smoggy, then he is not available.
Someone is not smoggy and not humorous if and only if he is available.
If Hope is not strange or Tony is not smoggy, then Jarvis is wooden.
All terrible people are not strange.
All humorous people are strange.
If someone is not humorous, then he is wooden. | Hope is smoggy. | neutral |
Rosie is wooden.
Hope is wooden.
Tony is not smoggy.
Sterling is not wooden.
Tony is not strange.
Justin is wooden.
Jarvis is not humorous.
Sterling is humorous.
Justin is humorous.
Tony is not humorous.
Rosie is smoggy.
Hall is terrible.Hope being not terrible and Tony being not humorous imply that Tony is available.
If Hall is not smoggy and Rosie is humorous, then Justin is not wooden and Rosie is terrible, and vice versa.
Someone being not smoggy is equivalent to being not humorous.
Jarvis being wooden is equivalent to Sterling being terrible and Sterling being not available.
Someone is terrible and smoggy if and only if he is not strange and not wooden.
All not wooden people are not smoggy.
If someone is not wooden or he is smoggy, then he is not available.
Someone is not smoggy and not humorous if and only if he is available.
If Hope is not strange or Tony is not smoggy, then Jarvis is wooden.
All terrible people are not strange.
All humorous people are strange.
If someone is not humorous, then he is wooden. | Rosie is not terrible. | neutral |
Rosie is wooden.
Hope is wooden.
Tony is not smoggy.
Sterling is not wooden.
Tony is not strange.
Justin is wooden.
Jarvis is not humorous.
Sterling is humorous.
Justin is humorous.
Tony is not humorous.
Rosie is smoggy.
Hall is terrible.Hope being not terrible and Tony being not humorous imply that Tony is available.
If Hall is not smoggy and Rosie is humorous, then Justin is not wooden and Rosie is terrible, and vice versa.
Someone being not smoggy is equivalent to being not humorous.
Jarvis being wooden is equivalent to Sterling being terrible and Sterling being not available.
Someone is terrible and smoggy if and only if he is not strange and not wooden.
All not wooden people are not smoggy.
If someone is not wooden or he is smoggy, then he is not available.
Someone is not smoggy and not humorous if and only if he is available.
If Hope is not strange or Tony is not smoggy, then Jarvis is wooden.
All terrible people are not strange.
All humorous people are strange.
If someone is not humorous, then he is wooden. | Hope is not smoggy. | neutral |
Rosie is wooden.
Hope is wooden.
Tony is not smoggy.
Sterling is not wooden.
Tony is not strange.
Justin is wooden.
Jarvis is not humorous.
Sterling is humorous.
Justin is humorous.
Tony is not humorous.
Rosie is smoggy.
Hall is terrible.Hope being not terrible and Tony being not humorous imply that Tony is available.
If Hall is not smoggy and Rosie is humorous, then Justin is not wooden and Rosie is terrible, and vice versa.
Someone being not smoggy is equivalent to being not humorous.
Jarvis being wooden is equivalent to Sterling being terrible and Sterling being not available.
Someone is terrible and smoggy if and only if he is not strange and not wooden.
All not wooden people are not smoggy.
If someone is not wooden or he is smoggy, then he is not available.
Someone is not smoggy and not humorous if and only if he is available.
If Hope is not strange or Tony is not smoggy, then Jarvis is wooden.
All terrible people are not strange.
All humorous people are strange.
If someone is not humorous, then he is wooden. | Rosie is not humorous. | neutral |
Rosie is wooden.
Hope is wooden.
Tony is not smoggy.
Sterling is not wooden.
Tony is not strange.
Justin is wooden.
Jarvis is not humorous.
Sterling is humorous.
Justin is humorous.
Tony is not humorous.
Rosie is smoggy.
Hall is terrible.Hope being not terrible and Tony being not humorous imply that Tony is available.
If Hall is not smoggy and Rosie is humorous, then Justin is not wooden and Rosie is terrible, and vice versa.
Someone being not smoggy is equivalent to being not humorous.
Jarvis being wooden is equivalent to Sterling being terrible and Sterling being not available.
Someone is terrible and smoggy if and only if he is not strange and not wooden.
All not wooden people are not smoggy.
If someone is not wooden or he is smoggy, then he is not available.
Someone is not smoggy and not humorous if and only if he is available.
If Hope is not strange or Tony is not smoggy, then Jarvis is wooden.
All terrible people are not strange.
All humorous people are strange.
If someone is not humorous, then he is wooden. | Hall is not wooden. | neutral |
Rosie is wooden.
Hope is wooden.
Tony is not smoggy.
Sterling is not wooden.
Tony is not strange.
Justin is wooden.
Jarvis is not humorous.
Sterling is humorous.
Justin is humorous.
Tony is not humorous.
Rosie is smoggy.
Hall is terrible.Hope being not terrible and Tony being not humorous imply that Tony is available.
If Hall is not smoggy and Rosie is humorous, then Justin is not wooden and Rosie is terrible, and vice versa.
Someone being not smoggy is equivalent to being not humorous.
Jarvis being wooden is equivalent to Sterling being terrible and Sterling being not available.
Someone is terrible and smoggy if and only if he is not strange and not wooden.
All not wooden people are not smoggy.
If someone is not wooden or he is smoggy, then he is not available.
Someone is not smoggy and not humorous if and only if he is available.
If Hope is not strange or Tony is not smoggy, then Jarvis is wooden.
All terrible people are not strange.
All humorous people are strange.
If someone is not humorous, then he is wooden. | Justin is wooden. | entailment |
Rosie is wooden.
Hope is wooden.
Tony is not smoggy.
Sterling is not wooden.
Tony is not strange.
Justin is wooden.
Jarvis is not humorous.
Sterling is humorous.
Justin is humorous.
Tony is not humorous.
Rosie is smoggy.
Hall is terrible.Hope being not terrible and Tony being not humorous imply that Tony is available.
If Hall is not smoggy and Rosie is humorous, then Justin is not wooden and Rosie is terrible, and vice versa.
Someone being not smoggy is equivalent to being not humorous.
Jarvis being wooden is equivalent to Sterling being terrible and Sterling being not available.
Someone is terrible and smoggy if and only if he is not strange and not wooden.
All not wooden people are not smoggy.
If someone is not wooden or he is smoggy, then he is not available.
Someone is not smoggy and not humorous if and only if he is available.
If Hope is not strange or Tony is not smoggy, then Jarvis is wooden.
All terrible people are not strange.
All humorous people are strange.
If someone is not humorous, then he is wooden. | Hope is not wooden. | contradiction |
Rosie is wooden.
Hope is wooden.
Tony is not smoggy.
Sterling is not wooden.
Tony is not strange.
Justin is wooden.
Jarvis is not humorous.
Sterling is humorous.
Justin is humorous.
Tony is not humorous.
Rosie is smoggy.
Hall is terrible.Hope being not terrible and Tony being not humorous imply that Tony is available.
If Hall is not smoggy and Rosie is humorous, then Justin is not wooden and Rosie is terrible, and vice versa.
Someone being not smoggy is equivalent to being not humorous.
Jarvis being wooden is equivalent to Sterling being terrible and Sterling being not available.
Someone is terrible and smoggy if and only if he is not strange and not wooden.
All not wooden people are not smoggy.
If someone is not wooden or he is smoggy, then he is not available.
Someone is not smoggy and not humorous if and only if he is available.
If Hope is not strange or Tony is not smoggy, then Jarvis is wooden.
All terrible people are not strange.
All humorous people are strange.
If someone is not humorous, then he is wooden. | Sterling is not smoggy. | self_contradiction |
Rosie is wooden.
Hope is wooden.
Tony is not smoggy.
Sterling is not wooden.
Tony is not strange.
Justin is wooden.
Jarvis is not humorous.
Sterling is humorous.
Justin is humorous.
Tony is not humorous.
Rosie is smoggy.
Hall is terrible.Hope being not terrible and Tony being not humorous imply that Tony is available.
If Hall is not smoggy and Rosie is humorous, then Justin is not wooden and Rosie is terrible, and vice versa.
Someone being not smoggy is equivalent to being not humorous.
Jarvis being wooden is equivalent to Sterling being terrible and Sterling being not available.
Someone is terrible and smoggy if and only if he is not strange and not wooden.
All not wooden people are not smoggy.
If someone is not wooden or he is smoggy, then he is not available.
Someone is not smoggy and not humorous if and only if he is available.
If Hope is not strange or Tony is not smoggy, then Jarvis is wooden.
All terrible people are not strange.
All humorous people are strange.
If someone is not humorous, then he is wooden. | Tony is not humorous. | entailment |
Alice is not impressive.
Alice is not humorous.
Mark is not humorous.
Sophie is not untidy.
Theodore is humorous.
Sophie is open.
Shamus is not serious.
Alice is not open.
Sophie is impressive.
Hardy is humorous.
Mark is not untidy.
Hardy is serious.If there is someone who is either open or not humorous, then Benton is serious.
If there is at least one people who is either not determined or not serious, then Sophie is not open and Hardy is impressive.
Someone who is both determined and serious is always not open.
It can be concluded that Sophie is not determined and Hardy is not untidy once knowing that Hardy is open.
All determined people are not serious.
If someone is not open or he is not impressive, then he is not determined.
If there is someone who is both untidy and impressive, then Shamus is not humorous and Shamus is determined.
Theodore being not determined and Sophie being not humorous imply that Sophie is serious and Hardy is untidy.
If someone is determined and not humorous, then he is both open and untidy, and vice versa.
If Hardy is not untidy, then Shamus is not humorous and Theodore is not open.
Someone who is not determined is always both humorous and impressive.
If there is at least one people who is humorous, then Benton is not open and Alice is not impressive. | Benton is not humorous. | contradiction |
Alice is not impressive.
Alice is not humorous.
Mark is not humorous.
Sophie is not untidy.
Theodore is humorous.
Sophie is open.
Shamus is not serious.
Alice is not open.
Sophie is impressive.
Hardy is humorous.
Mark is not untidy.
Hardy is serious.If there is someone who is either open or not humorous, then Benton is serious.
If there is at least one people who is either not determined or not serious, then Sophie is not open and Hardy is impressive.
Someone who is both determined and serious is always not open.
It can be concluded that Sophie is not determined and Hardy is not untidy once knowing that Hardy is open.
All determined people are not serious.
If someone is not open or he is not impressive, then he is not determined.
If there is someone who is both untidy and impressive, then Shamus is not humorous and Shamus is determined.
Theodore being not determined and Sophie being not humorous imply that Sophie is serious and Hardy is untidy.
If someone is determined and not humorous, then he is both open and untidy, and vice versa.
If Hardy is not untidy, then Shamus is not humorous and Theodore is not open.
Someone who is not determined is always both humorous and impressive.
If there is at least one people who is humorous, then Benton is not open and Alice is not impressive. | Benton is open. | contradiction |
Alice is not impressive.
Alice is not humorous.
Mark is not humorous.
Sophie is not untidy.
Theodore is humorous.
Sophie is open.
Shamus is not serious.
Alice is not open.
Sophie is impressive.
Hardy is humorous.
Mark is not untidy.
Hardy is serious.If there is someone who is either open or not humorous, then Benton is serious.
If there is at least one people who is either not determined or not serious, then Sophie is not open and Hardy is impressive.
Someone who is both determined and serious is always not open.
It can be concluded that Sophie is not determined and Hardy is not untidy once knowing that Hardy is open.
All determined people are not serious.
If someone is not open or he is not impressive, then he is not determined.
If there is someone who is both untidy and impressive, then Shamus is not humorous and Shamus is determined.
Theodore being not determined and Sophie being not humorous imply that Sophie is serious and Hardy is untidy.
If someone is determined and not humorous, then he is both open and untidy, and vice versa.
If Hardy is not untidy, then Shamus is not humorous and Theodore is not open.
Someone who is not determined is always both humorous and impressive.
If there is at least one people who is humorous, then Benton is not open and Alice is not impressive. | Alice is not impressive. | self_contradiction |
Alice is not impressive.
Alice is not humorous.
Mark is not humorous.
Sophie is not untidy.
Theodore is humorous.
Sophie is open.
Shamus is not serious.
Alice is not open.
Sophie is impressive.
Hardy is humorous.
Mark is not untidy.
Hardy is serious.If there is someone who is either open or not humorous, then Benton is serious.
If there is at least one people who is either not determined or not serious, then Sophie is not open and Hardy is impressive.
Someone who is both determined and serious is always not open.
It can be concluded that Sophie is not determined and Hardy is not untidy once knowing that Hardy is open.
All determined people are not serious.
If someone is not open or he is not impressive, then he is not determined.
If there is someone who is both untidy and impressive, then Shamus is not humorous and Shamus is determined.
Theodore being not determined and Sophie being not humorous imply that Sophie is serious and Hardy is untidy.
If someone is determined and not humorous, then he is both open and untidy, and vice versa.
If Hardy is not untidy, then Shamus is not humorous and Theodore is not open.
Someone who is not determined is always both humorous and impressive.
If there is at least one people who is humorous, then Benton is not open and Alice is not impressive. | Shamus is not untidy. | neutral |
Alice is not impressive.
Alice is not humorous.
Mark is not humorous.
Sophie is not untidy.
Theodore is humorous.
Sophie is open.
Shamus is not serious.
Alice is not open.
Sophie is impressive.
Hardy is humorous.
Mark is not untidy.
Hardy is serious.If there is someone who is either open or not humorous, then Benton is serious.
If there is at least one people who is either not determined or not serious, then Sophie is not open and Hardy is impressive.
Someone who is both determined and serious is always not open.
It can be concluded that Sophie is not determined and Hardy is not untidy once knowing that Hardy is open.
All determined people are not serious.
If someone is not open or he is not impressive, then he is not determined.
If there is someone who is both untidy and impressive, then Shamus is not humorous and Shamus is determined.
Theodore being not determined and Sophie being not humorous imply that Sophie is serious and Hardy is untidy.
If someone is determined and not humorous, then he is both open and untidy, and vice versa.
If Hardy is not untidy, then Shamus is not humorous and Theodore is not open.
Someone who is not determined is always both humorous and impressive.
If there is at least one people who is humorous, then Benton is not open and Alice is not impressive. | Theodore is humorous. | entailment |
Alice is not impressive.
Alice is not humorous.
Mark is not humorous.
Sophie is not untidy.
Theodore is humorous.
Sophie is open.
Shamus is not serious.
Alice is not open.
Sophie is impressive.
Hardy is humorous.
Mark is not untidy.
Hardy is serious.If there is someone who is either open or not humorous, then Benton is serious.
If there is at least one people who is either not determined or not serious, then Sophie is not open and Hardy is impressive.
Someone who is both determined and serious is always not open.
It can be concluded that Sophie is not determined and Hardy is not untidy once knowing that Hardy is open.
All determined people are not serious.
If someone is not open or he is not impressive, then he is not determined.
If there is someone who is both untidy and impressive, then Shamus is not humorous and Shamus is determined.
Theodore being not determined and Sophie being not humorous imply that Sophie is serious and Hardy is untidy.
If someone is determined and not humorous, then he is both open and untidy, and vice versa.
If Hardy is not untidy, then Shamus is not humorous and Theodore is not open.
Someone who is not determined is always both humorous and impressive.
If there is at least one people who is humorous, then Benton is not open and Alice is not impressive. | Theodore is not serious. | neutral |
Alice is not impressive.
Alice is not humorous.
Mark is not humorous.
Sophie is not untidy.
Theodore is humorous.
Sophie is open.
Shamus is not serious.
Alice is not open.
Sophie is impressive.
Hardy is humorous.
Mark is not untidy.
Hardy is serious.If there is someone who is either open or not humorous, then Benton is serious.
If there is at least one people who is either not determined or not serious, then Sophie is not open and Hardy is impressive.
Someone who is both determined and serious is always not open.
It can be concluded that Sophie is not determined and Hardy is not untidy once knowing that Hardy is open.
All determined people are not serious.
If someone is not open or he is not impressive, then he is not determined.
If there is someone who is both untidy and impressive, then Shamus is not humorous and Shamus is determined.
Theodore being not determined and Sophie being not humorous imply that Sophie is serious and Hardy is untidy.
If someone is determined and not humorous, then he is both open and untidy, and vice versa.
If Hardy is not untidy, then Shamus is not humorous and Theodore is not open.
Someone who is not determined is always both humorous and impressive.
If there is at least one people who is humorous, then Benton is not open and Alice is not impressive. | Sophie is not humorous. | contradiction |
Alice is not impressive.
Alice is not humorous.
Mark is not humorous.
Sophie is not untidy.
Theodore is humorous.
Sophie is open.
Shamus is not serious.
Alice is not open.
Sophie is impressive.
Hardy is humorous.
Mark is not untidy.
Hardy is serious.If there is someone who is either open or not humorous, then Benton is serious.
If there is at least one people who is either not determined or not serious, then Sophie is not open and Hardy is impressive.
Someone who is both determined and serious is always not open.
It can be concluded that Sophie is not determined and Hardy is not untidy once knowing that Hardy is open.
All determined people are not serious.
If someone is not open or he is not impressive, then he is not determined.
If there is someone who is both untidy and impressive, then Shamus is not humorous and Shamus is determined.
Theodore being not determined and Sophie being not humorous imply that Sophie is serious and Hardy is untidy.
If someone is determined and not humorous, then he is both open and untidy, and vice versa.
If Hardy is not untidy, then Shamus is not humorous and Theodore is not open.
Someone who is not determined is always both humorous and impressive.
If there is at least one people who is humorous, then Benton is not open and Alice is not impressive. | Shamus is not determined. | neutral |
Alice is not impressive.
Alice is not humorous.
Mark is not humorous.
Sophie is not untidy.
Theodore is humorous.
Sophie is open.
Shamus is not serious.
Alice is not open.
Sophie is impressive.
Hardy is humorous.
Mark is not untidy.
Hardy is serious.If there is someone who is either open or not humorous, then Benton is serious.
If there is at least one people who is either not determined or not serious, then Sophie is not open and Hardy is impressive.
Someone who is both determined and serious is always not open.
It can be concluded that Sophie is not determined and Hardy is not untidy once knowing that Hardy is open.
All determined people are not serious.
If someone is not open or he is not impressive, then he is not determined.
If there is someone who is both untidy and impressive, then Shamus is not humorous and Shamus is determined.
Theodore being not determined and Sophie being not humorous imply that Sophie is serious and Hardy is untidy.
If someone is determined and not humorous, then he is both open and untidy, and vice versa.
If Hardy is not untidy, then Shamus is not humorous and Theodore is not open.
Someone who is not determined is always both humorous and impressive.
If there is at least one people who is humorous, then Benton is not open and Alice is not impressive. | Alice is impressive. | self_contradiction |
Alice is not impressive.
Alice is not humorous.
Mark is not humorous.
Sophie is not untidy.
Theodore is humorous.
Sophie is open.
Shamus is not serious.
Alice is not open.
Sophie is impressive.
Hardy is humorous.
Mark is not untidy.
Hardy is serious.If there is someone who is either open or not humorous, then Benton is serious.
If there is at least one people who is either not determined or not serious, then Sophie is not open and Hardy is impressive.
Someone who is both determined and serious is always not open.
It can be concluded that Sophie is not determined and Hardy is not untidy once knowing that Hardy is open.
All determined people are not serious.
If someone is not open or he is not impressive, then he is not determined.
If there is someone who is both untidy and impressive, then Shamus is not humorous and Shamus is determined.
Theodore being not determined and Sophie being not humorous imply that Sophie is serious and Hardy is untidy.
If someone is determined and not humorous, then he is both open and untidy, and vice versa.
If Hardy is not untidy, then Shamus is not humorous and Theodore is not open.
Someone who is not determined is always both humorous and impressive.
If there is at least one people who is humorous, then Benton is not open and Alice is not impressive. | Benton is not open. | entailment |
Alice is not impressive.
Alice is not humorous.
Mark is not humorous.
Sophie is not untidy.
Theodore is humorous.
Sophie is open.
Shamus is not serious.
Alice is not open.
Sophie is impressive.
Hardy is humorous.
Mark is not untidy.
Hardy is serious.If there is someone who is either open or not humorous, then Benton is serious.
If there is at least one people who is either not determined or not serious, then Sophie is not open and Hardy is impressive.
Someone who is both determined and serious is always not open.
It can be concluded that Sophie is not determined and Hardy is not untidy once knowing that Hardy is open.
All determined people are not serious.
If someone is not open or he is not impressive, then he is not determined.
If there is someone who is both untidy and impressive, then Shamus is not humorous and Shamus is determined.
Theodore being not determined and Sophie being not humorous imply that Sophie is serious and Hardy is untidy.
If someone is determined and not humorous, then he is both open and untidy, and vice versa.
If Hardy is not untidy, then Shamus is not humorous and Theodore is not open.
Someone who is not determined is always both humorous and impressive.
If there is at least one people who is humorous, then Benton is not open and Alice is not impressive. | Hardy is impressive. | entailment |
Alice is not impressive.
Alice is not humorous.
Mark is not humorous.
Sophie is not untidy.
Theodore is humorous.
Sophie is open.
Shamus is not serious.
Alice is not open.
Sophie is impressive.
Hardy is humorous.
Mark is not untidy.
Hardy is serious.If there is someone who is either open or not humorous, then Benton is serious.
If there is at least one people who is either not determined or not serious, then Sophie is not open and Hardy is impressive.
Someone who is both determined and serious is always not open.
It can be concluded that Sophie is not determined and Hardy is not untidy once knowing that Hardy is open.
All determined people are not serious.
If someone is not open or he is not impressive, then he is not determined.
If there is someone who is both untidy and impressive, then Shamus is not humorous and Shamus is determined.
Theodore being not determined and Sophie being not humorous imply that Sophie is serious and Hardy is untidy.
If someone is determined and not humorous, then he is both open and untidy, and vice versa.
If Hardy is not untidy, then Shamus is not humorous and Theodore is not open.
Someone who is not determined is always both humorous and impressive.
If there is at least one people who is humorous, then Benton is not open and Alice is not impressive. | Alice is determined. | contradiction |
Alice is not impressive.
Alice is not humorous.
Mark is not humorous.
Sophie is not untidy.
Theodore is humorous.
Sophie is open.
Shamus is not serious.
Alice is not open.
Sophie is impressive.
Hardy is humorous.
Mark is not untidy.
Hardy is serious.If there is someone who is either open or not humorous, then Benton is serious.
If there is at least one people who is either not determined or not serious, then Sophie is not open and Hardy is impressive.
Someone who is both determined and serious is always not open.
It can be concluded that Sophie is not determined and Hardy is not untidy once knowing that Hardy is open.
All determined people are not serious.
If someone is not open or he is not impressive, then he is not determined.
If there is someone who is both untidy and impressive, then Shamus is not humorous and Shamus is determined.
Theodore being not determined and Sophie being not humorous imply that Sophie is serious and Hardy is untidy.
If someone is determined and not humorous, then he is both open and untidy, and vice versa.
If Hardy is not untidy, then Shamus is not humorous and Theodore is not open.
Someone who is not determined is always both humorous and impressive.
If there is at least one people who is humorous, then Benton is not open and Alice is not impressive. | Sophie is open. | self_contradiction |
Alice is not impressive.
Alice is not humorous.
Mark is not humorous.
Sophie is not untidy.
Theodore is humorous.
Sophie is open.
Shamus is not serious.
Alice is not open.
Sophie is impressive.
Hardy is humorous.
Mark is not untidy.
Hardy is serious.If there is someone who is either open or not humorous, then Benton is serious.
If there is at least one people who is either not determined or not serious, then Sophie is not open and Hardy is impressive.
Someone who is both determined and serious is always not open.
It can be concluded that Sophie is not determined and Hardy is not untidy once knowing that Hardy is open.
All determined people are not serious.
If someone is not open or he is not impressive, then he is not determined.
If there is someone who is both untidy and impressive, then Shamus is not humorous and Shamus is determined.
Theodore being not determined and Sophie being not humorous imply that Sophie is serious and Hardy is untidy.
If someone is determined and not humorous, then he is both open and untidy, and vice versa.
If Hardy is not untidy, then Shamus is not humorous and Theodore is not open.
Someone who is not determined is always both humorous and impressive.
If there is at least one people who is humorous, then Benton is not open and Alice is not impressive. | Benton is serious. | entailment |
Alice is not impressive.
Alice is not humorous.
Mark is not humorous.
Sophie is not untidy.
Theodore is humorous.
Sophie is open.
Shamus is not serious.
Alice is not open.
Sophie is impressive.
Hardy is humorous.
Mark is not untidy.
Hardy is serious.If there is someone who is either open or not humorous, then Benton is serious.
If there is at least one people who is either not determined or not serious, then Sophie is not open and Hardy is impressive.
Someone who is both determined and serious is always not open.
It can be concluded that Sophie is not determined and Hardy is not untidy once knowing that Hardy is open.
All determined people are not serious.
If someone is not open or he is not impressive, then he is not determined.
If there is someone who is both untidy and impressive, then Shamus is not humorous and Shamus is determined.
Theodore being not determined and Sophie being not humorous imply that Sophie is serious and Hardy is untidy.
If someone is determined and not humorous, then he is both open and untidy, and vice versa.
If Hardy is not untidy, then Shamus is not humorous and Theodore is not open.
Someone who is not determined is always both humorous and impressive.
If there is at least one people who is humorous, then Benton is not open and Alice is not impressive. | Alice is not humorous. | self_contradiction |
Alice is not impressive.
Alice is not humorous.
Mark is not humorous.
Sophie is not untidy.
Theodore is humorous.
Sophie is open.
Shamus is not serious.
Alice is not open.
Sophie is impressive.
Hardy is humorous.
Mark is not untidy.
Hardy is serious.If there is someone who is either open or not humorous, then Benton is serious.
If there is at least one people who is either not determined or not serious, then Sophie is not open and Hardy is impressive.
Someone who is both determined and serious is always not open.
It can be concluded that Sophie is not determined and Hardy is not untidy once knowing that Hardy is open.
All determined people are not serious.
If someone is not open or he is not impressive, then he is not determined.
If there is someone who is both untidy and impressive, then Shamus is not humorous and Shamus is determined.
Theodore being not determined and Sophie being not humorous imply that Sophie is serious and Hardy is untidy.
If someone is determined and not humorous, then he is both open and untidy, and vice versa.
If Hardy is not untidy, then Shamus is not humorous and Theodore is not open.
Someone who is not determined is always both humorous and impressive.
If there is at least one people who is humorous, then Benton is not open and Alice is not impressive. | Shamus is not open. | neutral |
Alice is not impressive.
Alice is not humorous.
Mark is not humorous.
Sophie is not untidy.
Theodore is humorous.
Sophie is open.
Shamus is not serious.
Alice is not open.
Sophie is impressive.
Hardy is humorous.
Mark is not untidy.
Hardy is serious.If there is someone who is either open or not humorous, then Benton is serious.
If there is at least one people who is either not determined or not serious, then Sophie is not open and Hardy is impressive.
Someone who is both determined and serious is always not open.
It can be concluded that Sophie is not determined and Hardy is not untidy once knowing that Hardy is open.
All determined people are not serious.
If someone is not open or he is not impressive, then he is not determined.
If there is someone who is both untidy and impressive, then Shamus is not humorous and Shamus is determined.
Theodore being not determined and Sophie being not humorous imply that Sophie is serious and Hardy is untidy.
If someone is determined and not humorous, then he is both open and untidy, and vice versa.
If Hardy is not untidy, then Shamus is not humorous and Theodore is not open.
Someone who is not determined is always both humorous and impressive.
If there is at least one people who is humorous, then Benton is not open and Alice is not impressive. | Mark is not determined. | neutral |
Alice is not impressive.
Alice is not humorous.
Mark is not humorous.
Sophie is not untidy.
Theodore is humorous.
Sophie is open.
Shamus is not serious.
Alice is not open.
Sophie is impressive.
Hardy is humorous.
Mark is not untidy.
Hardy is serious.If there is someone who is either open or not humorous, then Benton is serious.
If there is at least one people who is either not determined or not serious, then Sophie is not open and Hardy is impressive.
Someone who is both determined and serious is always not open.
It can be concluded that Sophie is not determined and Hardy is not untidy once knowing that Hardy is open.
All determined people are not serious.
If someone is not open or he is not impressive, then he is not determined.
If there is someone who is both untidy and impressive, then Shamus is not humorous and Shamus is determined.
Theodore being not determined and Sophie being not humorous imply that Sophie is serious and Hardy is untidy.
If someone is determined and not humorous, then he is both open and untidy, and vice versa.
If Hardy is not untidy, then Shamus is not humorous and Theodore is not open.
Someone who is not determined is always both humorous and impressive.
If there is at least one people who is humorous, then Benton is not open and Alice is not impressive. | Alice is humorous. | self_contradiction |
Alice is not impressive.
Alice is not humorous.
Mark is not humorous.
Sophie is not untidy.
Theodore is humorous.
Sophie is open.
Shamus is not serious.
Alice is not open.
Sophie is impressive.
Hardy is humorous.
Mark is not untidy.
Hardy is serious.If there is someone who is either open or not humorous, then Benton is serious.
If there is at least one people who is either not determined or not serious, then Sophie is not open and Hardy is impressive.
Someone who is both determined and serious is always not open.
It can be concluded that Sophie is not determined and Hardy is not untidy once knowing that Hardy is open.
All determined people are not serious.
If someone is not open or he is not impressive, then he is not determined.
If there is someone who is both untidy and impressive, then Shamus is not humorous and Shamus is determined.
Theodore being not determined and Sophie being not humorous imply that Sophie is serious and Hardy is untidy.
If someone is determined and not humorous, then he is both open and untidy, and vice versa.
If Hardy is not untidy, then Shamus is not humorous and Theodore is not open.
Someone who is not determined is always both humorous and impressive.
If there is at least one people who is humorous, then Benton is not open and Alice is not impressive. | Benton is determined. | contradiction |
Alice is not impressive.
Alice is not humorous.
Mark is not humorous.
Sophie is not untidy.
Theodore is humorous.
Sophie is open.
Shamus is not serious.
Alice is not open.
Sophie is impressive.
Hardy is humorous.
Mark is not untidy.
Hardy is serious.If there is someone who is either open or not humorous, then Benton is serious.
If there is at least one people who is either not determined or not serious, then Sophie is not open and Hardy is impressive.
Someone who is both determined and serious is always not open.
It can be concluded that Sophie is not determined and Hardy is not untidy once knowing that Hardy is open.
All determined people are not serious.
If someone is not open or he is not impressive, then he is not determined.
If there is someone who is both untidy and impressive, then Shamus is not humorous and Shamus is determined.
Theodore being not determined and Sophie being not humorous imply that Sophie is serious and Hardy is untidy.
If someone is determined and not humorous, then he is both open and untidy, and vice versa.
If Hardy is not untidy, then Shamus is not humorous and Theodore is not open.
Someone who is not determined is always both humorous and impressive.
If there is at least one people who is humorous, then Benton is not open and Alice is not impressive. | Benton is not determined. | entailment |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.