premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
---|---|---|
Gilbert is steep.
Alisa is not excited.
Douglas is curious.
Henry is excited.
Henry is not cotton.
Alisa is not steep.
Gilbert is not open.
Matthew is excited.
Alisa is not cotton.
Douglas is not important.
Gilbert is cotton.
Isabel is not cotton.If there is at least one people who is important, then Alisa is not open and Isabel is excited.
Someone being both not curious and open is equivalent to being not important and not excited.
If Henry is steep, then Douglas is not important and Henry is not excited, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Matthew is not cotton once knowing that Gilbert is important.
If someone is important and cotton, then he is both curious and not excited, and vice versa.
Quinn is not open if and only if Quinn is not cotton and Gilbert is steep.
Henry being curious is equivalent to Douglas being not cotton.
If someone is steep, then he is both not excited and important.
Someone who is not important is always both steep and open.
If Gilbert is excited, then Gilbert is steep, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not open, then Henry is not steep and Henry is cotton.
If everyone is excited, then Henry is open. | Henry is not curious. | neutral |
Gilbert is steep.
Alisa is not excited.
Douglas is curious.
Henry is excited.
Henry is not cotton.
Alisa is not steep.
Gilbert is not open.
Matthew is excited.
Alisa is not cotton.
Douglas is not important.
Gilbert is cotton.
Isabel is not cotton.If there is at least one people who is important, then Alisa is not open and Isabel is excited.
Someone being both not curious and open is equivalent to being not important and not excited.
If Henry is steep, then Douglas is not important and Henry is not excited, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Matthew is not cotton once knowing that Gilbert is important.
If someone is important and cotton, then he is both curious and not excited, and vice versa.
Quinn is not open if and only if Quinn is not cotton and Gilbert is steep.
Henry being curious is equivalent to Douglas being not cotton.
If someone is steep, then he is both not excited and important.
Someone who is not important is always both steep and open.
If Gilbert is excited, then Gilbert is steep, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not open, then Henry is not steep and Henry is cotton.
If everyone is excited, then Henry is open. | Henry is steep. | contradiction |
Gilbert is steep.
Alisa is not excited.
Douglas is curious.
Henry is excited.
Henry is not cotton.
Alisa is not steep.
Gilbert is not open.
Matthew is excited.
Alisa is not cotton.
Douglas is not important.
Gilbert is cotton.
Isabel is not cotton.If there is at least one people who is important, then Alisa is not open and Isabel is excited.
Someone being both not curious and open is equivalent to being not important and not excited.
If Henry is steep, then Douglas is not important and Henry is not excited, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Matthew is not cotton once knowing that Gilbert is important.
If someone is important and cotton, then he is both curious and not excited, and vice versa.
Quinn is not open if and only if Quinn is not cotton and Gilbert is steep.
Henry being curious is equivalent to Douglas being not cotton.
If someone is steep, then he is both not excited and important.
Someone who is not important is always both steep and open.
If Gilbert is excited, then Gilbert is steep, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not open, then Henry is not steep and Henry is cotton.
If everyone is excited, then Henry is open. | Isabel is open. | neutral |
Gilbert is steep.
Alisa is not excited.
Douglas is curious.
Henry is excited.
Henry is not cotton.
Alisa is not steep.
Gilbert is not open.
Matthew is excited.
Alisa is not cotton.
Douglas is not important.
Gilbert is cotton.
Isabel is not cotton.If there is at least one people who is important, then Alisa is not open and Isabel is excited.
Someone being both not curious and open is equivalent to being not important and not excited.
If Henry is steep, then Douglas is not important and Henry is not excited, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Matthew is not cotton once knowing that Gilbert is important.
If someone is important and cotton, then he is both curious and not excited, and vice versa.
Quinn is not open if and only if Quinn is not cotton and Gilbert is steep.
Henry being curious is equivalent to Douglas being not cotton.
If someone is steep, then he is both not excited and important.
Someone who is not important is always both steep and open.
If Gilbert is excited, then Gilbert is steep, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not open, then Henry is not steep and Henry is cotton.
If everyone is excited, then Henry is open. | Matthew is not open. | neutral |
Gilbert is steep.
Alisa is not excited.
Douglas is curious.
Henry is excited.
Henry is not cotton.
Alisa is not steep.
Gilbert is not open.
Matthew is excited.
Alisa is not cotton.
Douglas is not important.
Gilbert is cotton.
Isabel is not cotton.If there is at least one people who is important, then Alisa is not open and Isabel is excited.
Someone being both not curious and open is equivalent to being not important and not excited.
If Henry is steep, then Douglas is not important and Henry is not excited, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Matthew is not cotton once knowing that Gilbert is important.
If someone is important and cotton, then he is both curious and not excited, and vice versa.
Quinn is not open if and only if Quinn is not cotton and Gilbert is steep.
Henry being curious is equivalent to Douglas being not cotton.
If someone is steep, then he is both not excited and important.
Someone who is not important is always both steep and open.
If Gilbert is excited, then Gilbert is steep, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not open, then Henry is not steep and Henry is cotton.
If everyone is excited, then Henry is open. | Henry is not excited. | contradiction |
Gilbert is steep.
Alisa is not excited.
Douglas is curious.
Henry is excited.
Henry is not cotton.
Alisa is not steep.
Gilbert is not open.
Matthew is excited.
Alisa is not cotton.
Douglas is not important.
Gilbert is cotton.
Isabel is not cotton.If there is at least one people who is important, then Alisa is not open and Isabel is excited.
Someone being both not curious and open is equivalent to being not important and not excited.
If Henry is steep, then Douglas is not important and Henry is not excited, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Matthew is not cotton once knowing that Gilbert is important.
If someone is important and cotton, then he is both curious and not excited, and vice versa.
Quinn is not open if and only if Quinn is not cotton and Gilbert is steep.
Henry being curious is equivalent to Douglas being not cotton.
If someone is steep, then he is both not excited and important.
Someone who is not important is always both steep and open.
If Gilbert is excited, then Gilbert is steep, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not open, then Henry is not steep and Henry is cotton.
If everyone is excited, then Henry is open. | Alisa is not cotton. | entailment |
Gilbert is steep.
Alisa is not excited.
Douglas is curious.
Henry is excited.
Henry is not cotton.
Alisa is not steep.
Gilbert is not open.
Matthew is excited.
Alisa is not cotton.
Douglas is not important.
Gilbert is cotton.
Isabel is not cotton.If there is at least one people who is important, then Alisa is not open and Isabel is excited.
Someone being both not curious and open is equivalent to being not important and not excited.
If Henry is steep, then Douglas is not important and Henry is not excited, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Matthew is not cotton once knowing that Gilbert is important.
If someone is important and cotton, then he is both curious and not excited, and vice versa.
Quinn is not open if and only if Quinn is not cotton and Gilbert is steep.
Henry being curious is equivalent to Douglas being not cotton.
If someone is steep, then he is both not excited and important.
Someone who is not important is always both steep and open.
If Gilbert is excited, then Gilbert is steep, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not open, then Henry is not steep and Henry is cotton.
If everyone is excited, then Henry is open. | Matthew is not important. | neutral |
Gilbert is steep.
Alisa is not excited.
Douglas is curious.
Henry is excited.
Henry is not cotton.
Alisa is not steep.
Gilbert is not open.
Matthew is excited.
Alisa is not cotton.
Douglas is not important.
Gilbert is cotton.
Isabel is not cotton.If there is at least one people who is important, then Alisa is not open and Isabel is excited.
Someone being both not curious and open is equivalent to being not important and not excited.
If Henry is steep, then Douglas is not important and Henry is not excited, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Matthew is not cotton once knowing that Gilbert is important.
If someone is important and cotton, then he is both curious and not excited, and vice versa.
Quinn is not open if and only if Quinn is not cotton and Gilbert is steep.
Henry being curious is equivalent to Douglas being not cotton.
If someone is steep, then he is both not excited and important.
Someone who is not important is always both steep and open.
If Gilbert is excited, then Gilbert is steep, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not open, then Henry is not steep and Henry is cotton.
If everyone is excited, then Henry is open. | Douglas is not open. | contradiction |
Gilbert is steep.
Alisa is not excited.
Douglas is curious.
Henry is excited.
Henry is not cotton.
Alisa is not steep.
Gilbert is not open.
Matthew is excited.
Alisa is not cotton.
Douglas is not important.
Gilbert is cotton.
Isabel is not cotton.If there is at least one people who is important, then Alisa is not open and Isabel is excited.
Someone being both not curious and open is equivalent to being not important and not excited.
If Henry is steep, then Douglas is not important and Henry is not excited, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Matthew is not cotton once knowing that Gilbert is important.
If someone is important and cotton, then he is both curious and not excited, and vice versa.
Quinn is not open if and only if Quinn is not cotton and Gilbert is steep.
Henry being curious is equivalent to Douglas being not cotton.
If someone is steep, then he is both not excited and important.
Someone who is not important is always both steep and open.
If Gilbert is excited, then Gilbert is steep, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not open, then Henry is not steep and Henry is cotton.
If everyone is excited, then Henry is open. | Henry is not steep. | entailment |
Gilbert is steep.
Alisa is not excited.
Douglas is curious.
Henry is excited.
Henry is not cotton.
Alisa is not steep.
Gilbert is not open.
Matthew is excited.
Alisa is not cotton.
Douglas is not important.
Gilbert is cotton.
Isabel is not cotton.If there is at least one people who is important, then Alisa is not open and Isabel is excited.
Someone being both not curious and open is equivalent to being not important and not excited.
If Henry is steep, then Douglas is not important and Henry is not excited, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Matthew is not cotton once knowing that Gilbert is important.
If someone is important and cotton, then he is both curious and not excited, and vice versa.
Quinn is not open if and only if Quinn is not cotton and Gilbert is steep.
Henry being curious is equivalent to Douglas being not cotton.
If someone is steep, then he is both not excited and important.
Someone who is not important is always both steep and open.
If Gilbert is excited, then Gilbert is steep, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not open, then Henry is not steep and Henry is cotton.
If everyone is excited, then Henry is open. | Gilbert is excited. | self_contradiction |
Gilbert is steep.
Alisa is not excited.
Douglas is curious.
Henry is excited.
Henry is not cotton.
Alisa is not steep.
Gilbert is not open.
Matthew is excited.
Alisa is not cotton.
Douglas is not important.
Gilbert is cotton.
Isabel is not cotton.If there is at least one people who is important, then Alisa is not open and Isabel is excited.
Someone being both not curious and open is equivalent to being not important and not excited.
If Henry is steep, then Douglas is not important and Henry is not excited, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Matthew is not cotton once knowing that Gilbert is important.
If someone is important and cotton, then he is both curious and not excited, and vice versa.
Quinn is not open if and only if Quinn is not cotton and Gilbert is steep.
Henry being curious is equivalent to Douglas being not cotton.
If someone is steep, then he is both not excited and important.
Someone who is not important is always both steep and open.
If Gilbert is excited, then Gilbert is steep, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not open, then Henry is not steep and Henry is cotton.
If everyone is excited, then Henry is open. | Douglas is important. | self_contradiction |
Gilbert is steep.
Alisa is not excited.
Douglas is curious.
Henry is excited.
Henry is not cotton.
Alisa is not steep.
Gilbert is not open.
Matthew is excited.
Alisa is not cotton.
Douglas is not important.
Gilbert is cotton.
Isabel is not cotton.If there is at least one people who is important, then Alisa is not open and Isabel is excited.
Someone being both not curious and open is equivalent to being not important and not excited.
If Henry is steep, then Douglas is not important and Henry is not excited, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Matthew is not cotton once knowing that Gilbert is important.
If someone is important and cotton, then he is both curious and not excited, and vice versa.
Quinn is not open if and only if Quinn is not cotton and Gilbert is steep.
Henry being curious is equivalent to Douglas being not cotton.
If someone is steep, then he is both not excited and important.
Someone who is not important is always both steep and open.
If Gilbert is excited, then Gilbert is steep, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not open, then Henry is not steep and Henry is cotton.
If everyone is excited, then Henry is open. | Isabel is not cotton. | entailment |
Gilbert is steep.
Alisa is not excited.
Douglas is curious.
Henry is excited.
Henry is not cotton.
Alisa is not steep.
Gilbert is not open.
Matthew is excited.
Alisa is not cotton.
Douglas is not important.
Gilbert is cotton.
Isabel is not cotton.If there is at least one people who is important, then Alisa is not open and Isabel is excited.
Someone being both not curious and open is equivalent to being not important and not excited.
If Henry is steep, then Douglas is not important and Henry is not excited, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Matthew is not cotton once knowing that Gilbert is important.
If someone is important and cotton, then he is both curious and not excited, and vice versa.
Quinn is not open if and only if Quinn is not cotton and Gilbert is steep.
Henry being curious is equivalent to Douglas being not cotton.
If someone is steep, then he is both not excited and important.
Someone who is not important is always both steep and open.
If Gilbert is excited, then Gilbert is steep, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not open, then Henry is not steep and Henry is cotton.
If everyone is excited, then Henry is open. | Henry is cotton. | self_contradiction |
Gilbert is steep.
Alisa is not excited.
Douglas is curious.
Henry is excited.
Henry is not cotton.
Alisa is not steep.
Gilbert is not open.
Matthew is excited.
Alisa is not cotton.
Douglas is not important.
Gilbert is cotton.
Isabel is not cotton.If there is at least one people who is important, then Alisa is not open and Isabel is excited.
Someone being both not curious and open is equivalent to being not important and not excited.
If Henry is steep, then Douglas is not important and Henry is not excited, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Matthew is not cotton once knowing that Gilbert is important.
If someone is important and cotton, then he is both curious and not excited, and vice versa.
Quinn is not open if and only if Quinn is not cotton and Gilbert is steep.
Henry being curious is equivalent to Douglas being not cotton.
If someone is steep, then he is both not excited and important.
Someone who is not important is always both steep and open.
If Gilbert is excited, then Gilbert is steep, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not open, then Henry is not steep and Henry is cotton.
If everyone is excited, then Henry is open. | Gilbert is not steep. | contradiction |
Gilbert is steep.
Alisa is not excited.
Douglas is curious.
Henry is excited.
Henry is not cotton.
Alisa is not steep.
Gilbert is not open.
Matthew is excited.
Alisa is not cotton.
Douglas is not important.
Gilbert is cotton.
Isabel is not cotton.If there is at least one people who is important, then Alisa is not open and Isabel is excited.
Someone being both not curious and open is equivalent to being not important and not excited.
If Henry is steep, then Douglas is not important and Henry is not excited, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Matthew is not cotton once knowing that Gilbert is important.
If someone is important and cotton, then he is both curious and not excited, and vice versa.
Quinn is not open if and only if Quinn is not cotton and Gilbert is steep.
Henry being curious is equivalent to Douglas being not cotton.
If someone is steep, then he is both not excited and important.
Someone who is not important is always both steep and open.
If Gilbert is excited, then Gilbert is steep, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not open, then Henry is not steep and Henry is cotton.
If everyone is excited, then Henry is open. | Douglas is steep. | entailment |
Gilbert is steep.
Alisa is not excited.
Douglas is curious.
Henry is excited.
Henry is not cotton.
Alisa is not steep.
Gilbert is not open.
Matthew is excited.
Alisa is not cotton.
Douglas is not important.
Gilbert is cotton.
Isabel is not cotton.If there is at least one people who is important, then Alisa is not open and Isabel is excited.
Someone being both not curious and open is equivalent to being not important and not excited.
If Henry is steep, then Douglas is not important and Henry is not excited, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Matthew is not cotton once knowing that Gilbert is important.
If someone is important and cotton, then he is both curious and not excited, and vice versa.
Quinn is not open if and only if Quinn is not cotton and Gilbert is steep.
Henry being curious is equivalent to Douglas being not cotton.
If someone is steep, then he is both not excited and important.
Someone who is not important is always both steep and open.
If Gilbert is excited, then Gilbert is steep, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not open, then Henry is not steep and Henry is cotton.
If everyone is excited, then Henry is open. | Isabel is not open. | neutral |
Gilbert is steep.
Alisa is not excited.
Douglas is curious.
Henry is excited.
Henry is not cotton.
Alisa is not steep.
Gilbert is not open.
Matthew is excited.
Alisa is not cotton.
Douglas is not important.
Gilbert is cotton.
Isabel is not cotton.If there is at least one people who is important, then Alisa is not open and Isabel is excited.
Someone being both not curious and open is equivalent to being not important and not excited.
If Henry is steep, then Douglas is not important and Henry is not excited, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Matthew is not cotton once knowing that Gilbert is important.
If someone is important and cotton, then he is both curious and not excited, and vice versa.
Quinn is not open if and only if Quinn is not cotton and Gilbert is steep.
Henry being curious is equivalent to Douglas being not cotton.
If someone is steep, then he is both not excited and important.
Someone who is not important is always both steep and open.
If Gilbert is excited, then Gilbert is steep, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not open, then Henry is not steep and Henry is cotton.
If everyone is excited, then Henry is open. | Alisa is not open. | entailment |
Gilbert is steep.
Alisa is not excited.
Douglas is curious.
Henry is excited.
Henry is not cotton.
Alisa is not steep.
Gilbert is not open.
Matthew is excited.
Alisa is not cotton.
Douglas is not important.
Gilbert is cotton.
Isabel is not cotton.If there is at least one people who is important, then Alisa is not open and Isabel is excited.
Someone being both not curious and open is equivalent to being not important and not excited.
If Henry is steep, then Douglas is not important and Henry is not excited, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Matthew is not cotton once knowing that Gilbert is important.
If someone is important and cotton, then he is both curious and not excited, and vice versa.
Quinn is not open if and only if Quinn is not cotton and Gilbert is steep.
Henry being curious is equivalent to Douglas being not cotton.
If someone is steep, then he is both not excited and important.
Someone who is not important is always both steep and open.
If Gilbert is excited, then Gilbert is steep, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not open, then Henry is not steep and Henry is cotton.
If everyone is excited, then Henry is open. | Gilbert is not excited. | self_contradiction |
Gilbert is steep.
Alisa is not excited.
Douglas is curious.
Henry is excited.
Henry is not cotton.
Alisa is not steep.
Gilbert is not open.
Matthew is excited.
Alisa is not cotton.
Douglas is not important.
Gilbert is cotton.
Isabel is not cotton.If there is at least one people who is important, then Alisa is not open and Isabel is excited.
Someone being both not curious and open is equivalent to being not important and not excited.
If Henry is steep, then Douglas is not important and Henry is not excited, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Matthew is not cotton once knowing that Gilbert is important.
If someone is important and cotton, then he is both curious and not excited, and vice versa.
Quinn is not open if and only if Quinn is not cotton and Gilbert is steep.
Henry being curious is equivalent to Douglas being not cotton.
If someone is steep, then he is both not excited and important.
Someone who is not important is always both steep and open.
If Gilbert is excited, then Gilbert is steep, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not open, then Henry is not steep and Henry is cotton.
If everyone is excited, then Henry is open. | Douglas is not cotton. | contradiction |
Gilbert is steep.
Alisa is not excited.
Douglas is curious.
Henry is excited.
Henry is not cotton.
Alisa is not steep.
Gilbert is not open.
Matthew is excited.
Alisa is not cotton.
Douglas is not important.
Gilbert is cotton.
Isabel is not cotton.If there is at least one people who is important, then Alisa is not open and Isabel is excited.
Someone being both not curious and open is equivalent to being not important and not excited.
If Henry is steep, then Douglas is not important and Henry is not excited, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Matthew is not cotton once knowing that Gilbert is important.
If someone is important and cotton, then he is both curious and not excited, and vice versa.
Quinn is not open if and only if Quinn is not cotton and Gilbert is steep.
Henry being curious is equivalent to Douglas being not cotton.
If someone is steep, then he is both not excited and important.
Someone who is not important is always both steep and open.
If Gilbert is excited, then Gilbert is steep, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not open, then Henry is not steep and Henry is cotton.
If everyone is excited, then Henry is open. | Douglas is curious. | self_contradiction |
Kimberly is cautious.
Hadley is not cautious.
Matthew is gentle.
Deborah is not attentive.
Hadley is not plastic.
Ricardo is not frail.
Sherlock is not plastic.
Hadley is not attentive.
Kimberly is not united.
Matthew is not attentive.
Carl is not cautious.
Ricardo is not cautious.Someone being not attentive is equivalent to being plastic.
It can be concluded that Carl is attentive and Kimberly is not cautious once knowing that Carl is not gentle.
Hadley is attentive if and only if Ricardo is gentle and Kimberly is united.
If there is at least one people who is either not frail or not united, then Kimberly is not attentive and Carl is not cautious.
If there is someone who is not frail, then Carl is not attentive and Sherlock is not united.
It can be concluded that Ricardo is not frail once knowing that Sherlock is not cautious.
If someone is not united or gentle, then he is not cautious.
Hadley being not plastic and Matthew being not cautious imply that Ricardo is not attentive.
Hadley is not attentive if and only if Sherlock is gentle.
If there is nobody who is not not gentle, then Ricardo is not attentive and Kimberly is not united.
If there is someone who is gentle, then Kimberly is not united and Carl is not attentive.
If there is someone who is either gentle or cautious, then Ricardo is not plastic. | Hadley is frail. | neutral |
Kimberly is cautious.
Hadley is not cautious.
Matthew is gentle.
Deborah is not attentive.
Hadley is not plastic.
Ricardo is not frail.
Sherlock is not plastic.
Hadley is not attentive.
Kimberly is not united.
Matthew is not attentive.
Carl is not cautious.
Ricardo is not cautious.Someone being not attentive is equivalent to being plastic.
It can be concluded that Carl is attentive and Kimberly is not cautious once knowing that Carl is not gentle.
Hadley is attentive if and only if Ricardo is gentle and Kimberly is united.
If there is at least one people who is either not frail or not united, then Kimberly is not attentive and Carl is not cautious.
If there is someone who is not frail, then Carl is not attentive and Sherlock is not united.
It can be concluded that Ricardo is not frail once knowing that Sherlock is not cautious.
If someone is not united or gentle, then he is not cautious.
Hadley being not plastic and Matthew being not cautious imply that Ricardo is not attentive.
Hadley is not attentive if and only if Sherlock is gentle.
If there is nobody who is not not gentle, then Ricardo is not attentive and Kimberly is not united.
If there is someone who is gentle, then Kimberly is not united and Carl is not attentive.
If there is someone who is either gentle or cautious, then Ricardo is not plastic. | Hadley is not attentive. | entailment |
Kimberly is cautious.
Hadley is not cautious.
Matthew is gentle.
Deborah is not attentive.
Hadley is not plastic.
Ricardo is not frail.
Sherlock is not plastic.
Hadley is not attentive.
Kimberly is not united.
Matthew is not attentive.
Carl is not cautious.
Ricardo is not cautious.Someone being not attentive is equivalent to being plastic.
It can be concluded that Carl is attentive and Kimberly is not cautious once knowing that Carl is not gentle.
Hadley is attentive if and only if Ricardo is gentle and Kimberly is united.
If there is at least one people who is either not frail or not united, then Kimberly is not attentive and Carl is not cautious.
If there is someone who is not frail, then Carl is not attentive and Sherlock is not united.
It can be concluded that Ricardo is not frail once knowing that Sherlock is not cautious.
If someone is not united or gentle, then he is not cautious.
Hadley being not plastic and Matthew being not cautious imply that Ricardo is not attentive.
Hadley is not attentive if and only if Sherlock is gentle.
If there is nobody who is not not gentle, then Ricardo is not attentive and Kimberly is not united.
If there is someone who is gentle, then Kimberly is not united and Carl is not attentive.
If there is someone who is either gentle or cautious, then Ricardo is not plastic. | Hadley is not gentle. | neutral |
Kimberly is cautious.
Hadley is not cautious.
Matthew is gentle.
Deborah is not attentive.
Hadley is not plastic.
Ricardo is not frail.
Sherlock is not plastic.
Hadley is not attentive.
Kimberly is not united.
Matthew is not attentive.
Carl is not cautious.
Ricardo is not cautious.Someone being not attentive is equivalent to being plastic.
It can be concluded that Carl is attentive and Kimberly is not cautious once knowing that Carl is not gentle.
Hadley is attentive if and only if Ricardo is gentle and Kimberly is united.
If there is at least one people who is either not frail or not united, then Kimberly is not attentive and Carl is not cautious.
If there is someone who is not frail, then Carl is not attentive and Sherlock is not united.
It can be concluded that Ricardo is not frail once knowing that Sherlock is not cautious.
If someone is not united or gentle, then he is not cautious.
Hadley being not plastic and Matthew being not cautious imply that Ricardo is not attentive.
Hadley is not attentive if and only if Sherlock is gentle.
If there is nobody who is not not gentle, then Ricardo is not attentive and Kimberly is not united.
If there is someone who is gentle, then Kimberly is not united and Carl is not attentive.
If there is someone who is either gentle or cautious, then Ricardo is not plastic. | Deborah is not cautious. | neutral |
Kimberly is cautious.
Hadley is not cautious.
Matthew is gentle.
Deborah is not attentive.
Hadley is not plastic.
Ricardo is not frail.
Sherlock is not plastic.
Hadley is not attentive.
Kimberly is not united.
Matthew is not attentive.
Carl is not cautious.
Ricardo is not cautious.Someone being not attentive is equivalent to being plastic.
It can be concluded that Carl is attentive and Kimberly is not cautious once knowing that Carl is not gentle.
Hadley is attentive if and only if Ricardo is gentle and Kimberly is united.
If there is at least one people who is either not frail or not united, then Kimberly is not attentive and Carl is not cautious.
If there is someone who is not frail, then Carl is not attentive and Sherlock is not united.
It can be concluded that Ricardo is not frail once knowing that Sherlock is not cautious.
If someone is not united or gentle, then he is not cautious.
Hadley being not plastic and Matthew being not cautious imply that Ricardo is not attentive.
Hadley is not attentive if and only if Sherlock is gentle.
If there is nobody who is not not gentle, then Ricardo is not attentive and Kimberly is not united.
If there is someone who is gentle, then Kimberly is not united and Carl is not attentive.
If there is someone who is either gentle or cautious, then Ricardo is not plastic. | Carl is frail. | neutral |
Kimberly is cautious.
Hadley is not cautious.
Matthew is gentle.
Deborah is not attentive.
Hadley is not plastic.
Ricardo is not frail.
Sherlock is not plastic.
Hadley is not attentive.
Kimberly is not united.
Matthew is not attentive.
Carl is not cautious.
Ricardo is not cautious.Someone being not attentive is equivalent to being plastic.
It can be concluded that Carl is attentive and Kimberly is not cautious once knowing that Carl is not gentle.
Hadley is attentive if and only if Ricardo is gentle and Kimberly is united.
If there is at least one people who is either not frail or not united, then Kimberly is not attentive and Carl is not cautious.
If there is someone who is not frail, then Carl is not attentive and Sherlock is not united.
It can be concluded that Ricardo is not frail once knowing that Sherlock is not cautious.
If someone is not united or gentle, then he is not cautious.
Hadley being not plastic and Matthew being not cautious imply that Ricardo is not attentive.
Hadley is not attentive if and only if Sherlock is gentle.
If there is nobody who is not not gentle, then Ricardo is not attentive and Kimberly is not united.
If there is someone who is gentle, then Kimberly is not united and Carl is not attentive.
If there is someone who is either gentle or cautious, then Ricardo is not plastic. | Carl is not attentive. | entailment |
Kimberly is cautious.
Hadley is not cautious.
Matthew is gentle.
Deborah is not attentive.
Hadley is not plastic.
Ricardo is not frail.
Sherlock is not plastic.
Hadley is not attentive.
Kimberly is not united.
Matthew is not attentive.
Carl is not cautious.
Ricardo is not cautious.Someone being not attentive is equivalent to being plastic.
It can be concluded that Carl is attentive and Kimberly is not cautious once knowing that Carl is not gentle.
Hadley is attentive if and only if Ricardo is gentle and Kimberly is united.
If there is at least one people who is either not frail or not united, then Kimberly is not attentive and Carl is not cautious.
If there is someone who is not frail, then Carl is not attentive and Sherlock is not united.
It can be concluded that Ricardo is not frail once knowing that Sherlock is not cautious.
If someone is not united or gentle, then he is not cautious.
Hadley being not plastic and Matthew being not cautious imply that Ricardo is not attentive.
Hadley is not attentive if and only if Sherlock is gentle.
If there is nobody who is not not gentle, then Ricardo is not attentive and Kimberly is not united.
If there is someone who is gentle, then Kimberly is not united and Carl is not attentive.
If there is someone who is either gentle or cautious, then Ricardo is not plastic. | Hadley is not plastic. | self_contradiction |
Kimberly is cautious.
Hadley is not cautious.
Matthew is gentle.
Deborah is not attentive.
Hadley is not plastic.
Ricardo is not frail.
Sherlock is not plastic.
Hadley is not attentive.
Kimberly is not united.
Matthew is not attentive.
Carl is not cautious.
Ricardo is not cautious.Someone being not attentive is equivalent to being plastic.
It can be concluded that Carl is attentive and Kimberly is not cautious once knowing that Carl is not gentle.
Hadley is attentive if and only if Ricardo is gentle and Kimberly is united.
If there is at least one people who is either not frail or not united, then Kimberly is not attentive and Carl is not cautious.
If there is someone who is not frail, then Carl is not attentive and Sherlock is not united.
It can be concluded that Ricardo is not frail once knowing that Sherlock is not cautious.
If someone is not united or gentle, then he is not cautious.
Hadley being not plastic and Matthew being not cautious imply that Ricardo is not attentive.
Hadley is not attentive if and only if Sherlock is gentle.
If there is nobody who is not not gentle, then Ricardo is not attentive and Kimberly is not united.
If there is someone who is gentle, then Kimberly is not united and Carl is not attentive.
If there is someone who is either gentle or cautious, then Ricardo is not plastic. | Kimberly is cautious. | self_contradiction |
Kimberly is cautious.
Hadley is not cautious.
Matthew is gentle.
Deborah is not attentive.
Hadley is not plastic.
Ricardo is not frail.
Sherlock is not plastic.
Hadley is not attentive.
Kimberly is not united.
Matthew is not attentive.
Carl is not cautious.
Ricardo is not cautious.Someone being not attentive is equivalent to being plastic.
It can be concluded that Carl is attentive and Kimberly is not cautious once knowing that Carl is not gentle.
Hadley is attentive if and only if Ricardo is gentle and Kimberly is united.
If there is at least one people who is either not frail or not united, then Kimberly is not attentive and Carl is not cautious.
If there is someone who is not frail, then Carl is not attentive and Sherlock is not united.
It can be concluded that Ricardo is not frail once knowing that Sherlock is not cautious.
If someone is not united or gentle, then he is not cautious.
Hadley being not plastic and Matthew being not cautious imply that Ricardo is not attentive.
Hadley is not attentive if and only if Sherlock is gentle.
If there is nobody who is not not gentle, then Ricardo is not attentive and Kimberly is not united.
If there is someone who is gentle, then Kimberly is not united and Carl is not attentive.
If there is someone who is either gentle or cautious, then Ricardo is not plastic. | Kimberly is frail. | neutral |
Kimberly is cautious.
Hadley is not cautious.
Matthew is gentle.
Deborah is not attentive.
Hadley is not plastic.
Ricardo is not frail.
Sherlock is not plastic.
Hadley is not attentive.
Kimberly is not united.
Matthew is not attentive.
Carl is not cautious.
Ricardo is not cautious.Someone being not attentive is equivalent to being plastic.
It can be concluded that Carl is attentive and Kimberly is not cautious once knowing that Carl is not gentle.
Hadley is attentive if and only if Ricardo is gentle and Kimberly is united.
If there is at least one people who is either not frail or not united, then Kimberly is not attentive and Carl is not cautious.
If there is someone who is not frail, then Carl is not attentive and Sherlock is not united.
It can be concluded that Ricardo is not frail once knowing that Sherlock is not cautious.
If someone is not united or gentle, then he is not cautious.
Hadley being not plastic and Matthew being not cautious imply that Ricardo is not attentive.
Hadley is not attentive if and only if Sherlock is gentle.
If there is nobody who is not not gentle, then Ricardo is not attentive and Kimberly is not united.
If there is someone who is gentle, then Kimberly is not united and Carl is not attentive.
If there is someone who is either gentle or cautious, then Ricardo is not plastic. | Ricardo is not plastic. | self_contradiction |
Kimberly is cautious.
Hadley is not cautious.
Matthew is gentle.
Deborah is not attentive.
Hadley is not plastic.
Ricardo is not frail.
Sherlock is not plastic.
Hadley is not attentive.
Kimberly is not united.
Matthew is not attentive.
Carl is not cautious.
Ricardo is not cautious.Someone being not attentive is equivalent to being plastic.
It can be concluded that Carl is attentive and Kimberly is not cautious once knowing that Carl is not gentle.
Hadley is attentive if and only if Ricardo is gentle and Kimberly is united.
If there is at least one people who is either not frail or not united, then Kimberly is not attentive and Carl is not cautious.
If there is someone who is not frail, then Carl is not attentive and Sherlock is not united.
It can be concluded that Ricardo is not frail once knowing that Sherlock is not cautious.
If someone is not united or gentle, then he is not cautious.
Hadley being not plastic and Matthew being not cautious imply that Ricardo is not attentive.
Hadley is not attentive if and only if Sherlock is gentle.
If there is nobody who is not not gentle, then Ricardo is not attentive and Kimberly is not united.
If there is someone who is gentle, then Kimberly is not united and Carl is not attentive.
If there is someone who is either gentle or cautious, then Ricardo is not plastic. | Kimberly is not cautious. | self_contradiction |
Kimberly is cautious.
Hadley is not cautious.
Matthew is gentle.
Deborah is not attentive.
Hadley is not plastic.
Ricardo is not frail.
Sherlock is not plastic.
Hadley is not attentive.
Kimberly is not united.
Matthew is not attentive.
Carl is not cautious.
Ricardo is not cautious.Someone being not attentive is equivalent to being plastic.
It can be concluded that Carl is attentive and Kimberly is not cautious once knowing that Carl is not gentle.
Hadley is attentive if and only if Ricardo is gentle and Kimberly is united.
If there is at least one people who is either not frail or not united, then Kimberly is not attentive and Carl is not cautious.
If there is someone who is not frail, then Carl is not attentive and Sherlock is not united.
It can be concluded that Ricardo is not frail once knowing that Sherlock is not cautious.
If someone is not united or gentle, then he is not cautious.
Hadley being not plastic and Matthew being not cautious imply that Ricardo is not attentive.
Hadley is not attentive if and only if Sherlock is gentle.
If there is nobody who is not not gentle, then Ricardo is not attentive and Kimberly is not united.
If there is someone who is gentle, then Kimberly is not united and Carl is not attentive.
If there is someone who is either gentle or cautious, then Ricardo is not plastic. | Hadley is plastic. | self_contradiction |
Kimberly is cautious.
Hadley is not cautious.
Matthew is gentle.
Deborah is not attentive.
Hadley is not plastic.
Ricardo is not frail.
Sherlock is not plastic.
Hadley is not attentive.
Kimberly is not united.
Matthew is not attentive.
Carl is not cautious.
Ricardo is not cautious.Someone being not attentive is equivalent to being plastic.
It can be concluded that Carl is attentive and Kimberly is not cautious once knowing that Carl is not gentle.
Hadley is attentive if and only if Ricardo is gentle and Kimberly is united.
If there is at least one people who is either not frail or not united, then Kimberly is not attentive and Carl is not cautious.
If there is someone who is not frail, then Carl is not attentive and Sherlock is not united.
It can be concluded that Ricardo is not frail once knowing that Sherlock is not cautious.
If someone is not united or gentle, then he is not cautious.
Hadley being not plastic and Matthew being not cautious imply that Ricardo is not attentive.
Hadley is not attentive if and only if Sherlock is gentle.
If there is nobody who is not not gentle, then Ricardo is not attentive and Kimberly is not united.
If there is someone who is gentle, then Kimberly is not united and Carl is not attentive.
If there is someone who is either gentle or cautious, then Ricardo is not plastic. | Deborah is plastic. | entailment |
Kimberly is cautious.
Hadley is not cautious.
Matthew is gentle.
Deborah is not attentive.
Hadley is not plastic.
Ricardo is not frail.
Sherlock is not plastic.
Hadley is not attentive.
Kimberly is not united.
Matthew is not attentive.
Carl is not cautious.
Ricardo is not cautious.Someone being not attentive is equivalent to being plastic.
It can be concluded that Carl is attentive and Kimberly is not cautious once knowing that Carl is not gentle.
Hadley is attentive if and only if Ricardo is gentle and Kimberly is united.
If there is at least one people who is either not frail or not united, then Kimberly is not attentive and Carl is not cautious.
If there is someone who is not frail, then Carl is not attentive and Sherlock is not united.
It can be concluded that Ricardo is not frail once knowing that Sherlock is not cautious.
If someone is not united or gentle, then he is not cautious.
Hadley being not plastic and Matthew being not cautious imply that Ricardo is not attentive.
Hadley is not attentive if and only if Sherlock is gentle.
If there is nobody who is not not gentle, then Ricardo is not attentive and Kimberly is not united.
If there is someone who is gentle, then Kimberly is not united and Carl is not attentive.
If there is someone who is either gentle or cautious, then Ricardo is not plastic. | Carl is cautious. | contradiction |
Kimberly is cautious.
Hadley is not cautious.
Matthew is gentle.
Deborah is not attentive.
Hadley is not plastic.
Ricardo is not frail.
Sherlock is not plastic.
Hadley is not attentive.
Kimberly is not united.
Matthew is not attentive.
Carl is not cautious.
Ricardo is not cautious.Someone being not attentive is equivalent to being plastic.
It can be concluded that Carl is attentive and Kimberly is not cautious once knowing that Carl is not gentle.
Hadley is attentive if and only if Ricardo is gentle and Kimberly is united.
If there is at least one people who is either not frail or not united, then Kimberly is not attentive and Carl is not cautious.
If there is someone who is not frail, then Carl is not attentive and Sherlock is not united.
It can be concluded that Ricardo is not frail once knowing that Sherlock is not cautious.
If someone is not united or gentle, then he is not cautious.
Hadley being not plastic and Matthew being not cautious imply that Ricardo is not attentive.
Hadley is not attentive if and only if Sherlock is gentle.
If there is nobody who is not not gentle, then Ricardo is not attentive and Kimberly is not united.
If there is someone who is gentle, then Kimberly is not united and Carl is not attentive.
If there is someone who is either gentle or cautious, then Ricardo is not plastic. | Ricardo is frail. | contradiction |
Kimberly is cautious.
Hadley is not cautious.
Matthew is gentle.
Deborah is not attentive.
Hadley is not plastic.
Ricardo is not frail.
Sherlock is not plastic.
Hadley is not attentive.
Kimberly is not united.
Matthew is not attentive.
Carl is not cautious.
Ricardo is not cautious.Someone being not attentive is equivalent to being plastic.
It can be concluded that Carl is attentive and Kimberly is not cautious once knowing that Carl is not gentle.
Hadley is attentive if and only if Ricardo is gentle and Kimberly is united.
If there is at least one people who is either not frail or not united, then Kimberly is not attentive and Carl is not cautious.
If there is someone who is not frail, then Carl is not attentive and Sherlock is not united.
It can be concluded that Ricardo is not frail once knowing that Sherlock is not cautious.
If someone is not united or gentle, then he is not cautious.
Hadley being not plastic and Matthew being not cautious imply that Ricardo is not attentive.
Hadley is not attentive if and only if Sherlock is gentle.
If there is nobody who is not not gentle, then Ricardo is not attentive and Kimberly is not united.
If there is someone who is gentle, then Kimberly is not united and Carl is not attentive.
If there is someone who is either gentle or cautious, then Ricardo is not plastic. | Sherlock is cautious. | contradiction |
Kimberly is cautious.
Hadley is not cautious.
Matthew is gentle.
Deborah is not attentive.
Hadley is not plastic.
Ricardo is not frail.
Sherlock is not plastic.
Hadley is not attentive.
Kimberly is not united.
Matthew is not attentive.
Carl is not cautious.
Ricardo is not cautious.Someone being not attentive is equivalent to being plastic.
It can be concluded that Carl is attentive and Kimberly is not cautious once knowing that Carl is not gentle.
Hadley is attentive if and only if Ricardo is gentle and Kimberly is united.
If there is at least one people who is either not frail or not united, then Kimberly is not attentive and Carl is not cautious.
If there is someone who is not frail, then Carl is not attentive and Sherlock is not united.
It can be concluded that Ricardo is not frail once knowing that Sherlock is not cautious.
If someone is not united or gentle, then he is not cautious.
Hadley being not plastic and Matthew being not cautious imply that Ricardo is not attentive.
Hadley is not attentive if and only if Sherlock is gentle.
If there is nobody who is not not gentle, then Ricardo is not attentive and Kimberly is not united.
If there is someone who is gentle, then Kimberly is not united and Carl is not attentive.
If there is someone who is either gentle or cautious, then Ricardo is not plastic. | Ricardo is not attentive. | entailment |
Kimberly is cautious.
Hadley is not cautious.
Matthew is gentle.
Deborah is not attentive.
Hadley is not plastic.
Ricardo is not frail.
Sherlock is not plastic.
Hadley is not attentive.
Kimberly is not united.
Matthew is not attentive.
Carl is not cautious.
Ricardo is not cautious.Someone being not attentive is equivalent to being plastic.
It can be concluded that Carl is attentive and Kimberly is not cautious once knowing that Carl is not gentle.
Hadley is attentive if and only if Ricardo is gentle and Kimberly is united.
If there is at least one people who is either not frail or not united, then Kimberly is not attentive and Carl is not cautious.
If there is someone who is not frail, then Carl is not attentive and Sherlock is not united.
It can be concluded that Ricardo is not frail once knowing that Sherlock is not cautious.
If someone is not united or gentle, then he is not cautious.
Hadley being not plastic and Matthew being not cautious imply that Ricardo is not attentive.
Hadley is not attentive if and only if Sherlock is gentle.
If there is nobody who is not not gentle, then Ricardo is not attentive and Kimberly is not united.
If there is someone who is gentle, then Kimberly is not united and Carl is not attentive.
If there is someone who is either gentle or cautious, then Ricardo is not plastic. | Matthew is plastic. | entailment |
Kimberly is cautious.
Hadley is not cautious.
Matthew is gentle.
Deborah is not attentive.
Hadley is not plastic.
Ricardo is not frail.
Sherlock is not plastic.
Hadley is not attentive.
Kimberly is not united.
Matthew is not attentive.
Carl is not cautious.
Ricardo is not cautious.Someone being not attentive is equivalent to being plastic.
It can be concluded that Carl is attentive and Kimberly is not cautious once knowing that Carl is not gentle.
Hadley is attentive if and only if Ricardo is gentle and Kimberly is united.
If there is at least one people who is either not frail or not united, then Kimberly is not attentive and Carl is not cautious.
If there is someone who is not frail, then Carl is not attentive and Sherlock is not united.
It can be concluded that Ricardo is not frail once knowing that Sherlock is not cautious.
If someone is not united or gentle, then he is not cautious.
Hadley being not plastic and Matthew being not cautious imply that Ricardo is not attentive.
Hadley is not attentive if and only if Sherlock is gentle.
If there is nobody who is not not gentle, then Ricardo is not attentive and Kimberly is not united.
If there is someone who is gentle, then Kimberly is not united and Carl is not attentive.
If there is someone who is either gentle or cautious, then Ricardo is not plastic. | Deborah is attentive. | contradiction |
Kimberly is cautious.
Hadley is not cautious.
Matthew is gentle.
Deborah is not attentive.
Hadley is not plastic.
Ricardo is not frail.
Sherlock is not plastic.
Hadley is not attentive.
Kimberly is not united.
Matthew is not attentive.
Carl is not cautious.
Ricardo is not cautious.Someone being not attentive is equivalent to being plastic.
It can be concluded that Carl is attentive and Kimberly is not cautious once knowing that Carl is not gentle.
Hadley is attentive if and only if Ricardo is gentle and Kimberly is united.
If there is at least one people who is either not frail or not united, then Kimberly is not attentive and Carl is not cautious.
If there is someone who is not frail, then Carl is not attentive and Sherlock is not united.
It can be concluded that Ricardo is not frail once knowing that Sherlock is not cautious.
If someone is not united or gentle, then he is not cautious.
Hadley being not plastic and Matthew being not cautious imply that Ricardo is not attentive.
Hadley is not attentive if and only if Sherlock is gentle.
If there is nobody who is not not gentle, then Ricardo is not attentive and Kimberly is not united.
If there is someone who is gentle, then Kimberly is not united and Carl is not attentive.
If there is someone who is either gentle or cautious, then Ricardo is not plastic. | Sherlock is not gentle. | contradiction |
Traci is careful.
Robert is dangerous.
Mark is not superior.
Mark is cool.
Hunter is not sweet.
Hunter is not cool.
Hunter is teeny.
Kendrick is teeny.
Kendrick is dangerous.
Traci is not dangerous.
Traci is teeny.
Kendrick is careful.If there is at least one people who is both not teeny and dangerous, then Traci is not superior.
If Hunter is not dangerous and Robert is sweet, then Halden is not cool.
If someone is either not cool or not sweet, then he is not dangerous and not teeny.
Someone who is not sweet is always careful.
If there is someone who is both not dangerous and not sweet, then Rex is teeny.
If someone is not cool, then he is not superior, and vice versa.
All not dangerous people are not cool.
If someone is dangerous or he is not careful, then he is superior.
If someone is superior, then he is cool, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is dangerous, then Rex is not superior and Robert is not careful.
If there is someone who is both not sweet and superior, then Rex is not teeny.
Someone is sweet if and only if he is not teeny. | Robert is not sweet. | neutral |
Traci is careful.
Robert is dangerous.
Mark is not superior.
Mark is cool.
Hunter is not sweet.
Hunter is not cool.
Hunter is teeny.
Kendrick is teeny.
Kendrick is dangerous.
Traci is not dangerous.
Traci is teeny.
Kendrick is careful.If there is at least one people who is both not teeny and dangerous, then Traci is not superior.
If Hunter is not dangerous and Robert is sweet, then Halden is not cool.
If someone is either not cool or not sweet, then he is not dangerous and not teeny.
Someone who is not sweet is always careful.
If there is someone who is both not dangerous and not sweet, then Rex is teeny.
If someone is not cool, then he is not superior, and vice versa.
All not dangerous people are not cool.
If someone is dangerous or he is not careful, then he is superior.
If someone is superior, then he is cool, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is dangerous, then Rex is not superior and Robert is not careful.
If there is someone who is both not sweet and superior, then Rex is not teeny.
Someone is sweet if and only if he is not teeny. | Rex is careful. | neutral |
Traci is careful.
Robert is dangerous.
Mark is not superior.
Mark is cool.
Hunter is not sweet.
Hunter is not cool.
Hunter is teeny.
Kendrick is teeny.
Kendrick is dangerous.
Traci is not dangerous.
Traci is teeny.
Kendrick is careful.If there is at least one people who is both not teeny and dangerous, then Traci is not superior.
If Hunter is not dangerous and Robert is sweet, then Halden is not cool.
If someone is either not cool or not sweet, then he is not dangerous and not teeny.
Someone who is not sweet is always careful.
If there is someone who is both not dangerous and not sweet, then Rex is teeny.
If someone is not cool, then he is not superior, and vice versa.
All not dangerous people are not cool.
If someone is dangerous or he is not careful, then he is superior.
If someone is superior, then he is cool, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is dangerous, then Rex is not superior and Robert is not careful.
If there is someone who is both not sweet and superior, then Rex is not teeny.
Someone is sweet if and only if he is not teeny. | Hunter is not dangerous. | entailment |
Traci is careful.
Robert is dangerous.
Mark is not superior.
Mark is cool.
Hunter is not sweet.
Hunter is not cool.
Hunter is teeny.
Kendrick is teeny.
Kendrick is dangerous.
Traci is not dangerous.
Traci is teeny.
Kendrick is careful.If there is at least one people who is both not teeny and dangerous, then Traci is not superior.
If Hunter is not dangerous and Robert is sweet, then Halden is not cool.
If someone is either not cool or not sweet, then he is not dangerous and not teeny.
Someone who is not sweet is always careful.
If there is someone who is both not dangerous and not sweet, then Rex is teeny.
If someone is not cool, then he is not superior, and vice versa.
All not dangerous people are not cool.
If someone is dangerous or he is not careful, then he is superior.
If someone is superior, then he is cool, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is dangerous, then Rex is not superior and Robert is not careful.
If there is someone who is both not sweet and superior, then Rex is not teeny.
Someone is sweet if and only if he is not teeny. | Kendrick is not superior. | contradiction |
Traci is careful.
Robert is dangerous.
Mark is not superior.
Mark is cool.
Hunter is not sweet.
Hunter is not cool.
Hunter is teeny.
Kendrick is teeny.
Kendrick is dangerous.
Traci is not dangerous.
Traci is teeny.
Kendrick is careful.If there is at least one people who is both not teeny and dangerous, then Traci is not superior.
If Hunter is not dangerous and Robert is sweet, then Halden is not cool.
If someone is either not cool or not sweet, then he is not dangerous and not teeny.
Someone who is not sweet is always careful.
If there is someone who is both not dangerous and not sweet, then Rex is teeny.
If someone is not cool, then he is not superior, and vice versa.
All not dangerous people are not cool.
If someone is dangerous or he is not careful, then he is superior.
If someone is superior, then he is cool, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is dangerous, then Rex is not superior and Robert is not careful.
If there is someone who is both not sweet and superior, then Rex is not teeny.
Someone is sweet if and only if he is not teeny. | Rex is teeny. | self_contradiction |
Traci is careful.
Robert is dangerous.
Mark is not superior.
Mark is cool.
Hunter is not sweet.
Hunter is not cool.
Hunter is teeny.
Kendrick is teeny.
Kendrick is dangerous.
Traci is not dangerous.
Traci is teeny.
Kendrick is careful.If there is at least one people who is both not teeny and dangerous, then Traci is not superior.
If Hunter is not dangerous and Robert is sweet, then Halden is not cool.
If someone is either not cool or not sweet, then he is not dangerous and not teeny.
Someone who is not sweet is always careful.
If there is someone who is both not dangerous and not sweet, then Rex is teeny.
If someone is not cool, then he is not superior, and vice versa.
All not dangerous people are not cool.
If someone is dangerous or he is not careful, then he is superior.
If someone is superior, then he is cool, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is dangerous, then Rex is not superior and Robert is not careful.
If there is someone who is both not sweet and superior, then Rex is not teeny.
Someone is sweet if and only if he is not teeny. | Traci is cool. | contradiction |
Traci is careful.
Robert is dangerous.
Mark is not superior.
Mark is cool.
Hunter is not sweet.
Hunter is not cool.
Hunter is teeny.
Kendrick is teeny.
Kendrick is dangerous.
Traci is not dangerous.
Traci is teeny.
Kendrick is careful.If there is at least one people who is both not teeny and dangerous, then Traci is not superior.
If Hunter is not dangerous and Robert is sweet, then Halden is not cool.
If someone is either not cool or not sweet, then he is not dangerous and not teeny.
Someone who is not sweet is always careful.
If there is someone who is both not dangerous and not sweet, then Rex is teeny.
If someone is not cool, then he is not superior, and vice versa.
All not dangerous people are not cool.
If someone is dangerous or he is not careful, then he is superior.
If someone is superior, then he is cool, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is dangerous, then Rex is not superior and Robert is not careful.
If there is someone who is both not sweet and superior, then Rex is not teeny.
Someone is sweet if and only if he is not teeny. | Halden is teeny. | neutral |
Traci is careful.
Robert is dangerous.
Mark is not superior.
Mark is cool.
Hunter is not sweet.
Hunter is not cool.
Hunter is teeny.
Kendrick is teeny.
Kendrick is dangerous.
Traci is not dangerous.
Traci is teeny.
Kendrick is careful.If there is at least one people who is both not teeny and dangerous, then Traci is not superior.
If Hunter is not dangerous and Robert is sweet, then Halden is not cool.
If someone is either not cool or not sweet, then he is not dangerous and not teeny.
Someone who is not sweet is always careful.
If there is someone who is both not dangerous and not sweet, then Rex is teeny.
If someone is not cool, then he is not superior, and vice versa.
All not dangerous people are not cool.
If someone is dangerous or he is not careful, then he is superior.
If someone is superior, then he is cool, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is dangerous, then Rex is not superior and Robert is not careful.
If there is someone who is both not sweet and superior, then Rex is not teeny.
Someone is sweet if and only if he is not teeny. | Kendrick is not careful. | contradiction |
Traci is careful.
Robert is dangerous.
Mark is not superior.
Mark is cool.
Hunter is not sweet.
Hunter is not cool.
Hunter is teeny.
Kendrick is teeny.
Kendrick is dangerous.
Traci is not dangerous.
Traci is teeny.
Kendrick is careful.If there is at least one people who is both not teeny and dangerous, then Traci is not superior.
If Hunter is not dangerous and Robert is sweet, then Halden is not cool.
If someone is either not cool or not sweet, then he is not dangerous and not teeny.
Someone who is not sweet is always careful.
If there is someone who is both not dangerous and not sweet, then Rex is teeny.
If someone is not cool, then he is not superior, and vice versa.
All not dangerous people are not cool.
If someone is dangerous or he is not careful, then he is superior.
If someone is superior, then he is cool, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is dangerous, then Rex is not superior and Robert is not careful.
If there is someone who is both not sweet and superior, then Rex is not teeny.
Someone is sweet if and only if he is not teeny. | Mark is not cool. | self_contradiction |
Traci is careful.
Robert is dangerous.
Mark is not superior.
Mark is cool.
Hunter is not sweet.
Hunter is not cool.
Hunter is teeny.
Kendrick is teeny.
Kendrick is dangerous.
Traci is not dangerous.
Traci is teeny.
Kendrick is careful.If there is at least one people who is both not teeny and dangerous, then Traci is not superior.
If Hunter is not dangerous and Robert is sweet, then Halden is not cool.
If someone is either not cool or not sweet, then he is not dangerous and not teeny.
Someone who is not sweet is always careful.
If there is someone who is both not dangerous and not sweet, then Rex is teeny.
If someone is not cool, then he is not superior, and vice versa.
All not dangerous people are not cool.
If someone is dangerous or he is not careful, then he is superior.
If someone is superior, then he is cool, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is dangerous, then Rex is not superior and Robert is not careful.
If there is someone who is both not sweet and superior, then Rex is not teeny.
Someone is sweet if and only if he is not teeny. | Halden is not superior. | neutral |
Traci is careful.
Robert is dangerous.
Mark is not superior.
Mark is cool.
Hunter is not sweet.
Hunter is not cool.
Hunter is teeny.
Kendrick is teeny.
Kendrick is dangerous.
Traci is not dangerous.
Traci is teeny.
Kendrick is careful.If there is at least one people who is both not teeny and dangerous, then Traci is not superior.
If Hunter is not dangerous and Robert is sweet, then Halden is not cool.
If someone is either not cool or not sweet, then he is not dangerous and not teeny.
Someone who is not sweet is always careful.
If there is someone who is both not dangerous and not sweet, then Rex is teeny.
If someone is not cool, then he is not superior, and vice versa.
All not dangerous people are not cool.
If someone is dangerous or he is not careful, then he is superior.
If someone is superior, then he is cool, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is dangerous, then Rex is not superior and Robert is not careful.
If there is someone who is both not sweet and superior, then Rex is not teeny.
Someone is sweet if and only if he is not teeny. | Kendrick is cool. | entailment |
Traci is careful.
Robert is dangerous.
Mark is not superior.
Mark is cool.
Hunter is not sweet.
Hunter is not cool.
Hunter is teeny.
Kendrick is teeny.
Kendrick is dangerous.
Traci is not dangerous.
Traci is teeny.
Kendrick is careful.If there is at least one people who is both not teeny and dangerous, then Traci is not superior.
If Hunter is not dangerous and Robert is sweet, then Halden is not cool.
If someone is either not cool or not sweet, then he is not dangerous and not teeny.
Someone who is not sweet is always careful.
If there is someone who is both not dangerous and not sweet, then Rex is teeny.
If someone is not cool, then he is not superior, and vice versa.
All not dangerous people are not cool.
If someone is dangerous or he is not careful, then he is superior.
If someone is superior, then he is cool, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is dangerous, then Rex is not superior and Robert is not careful.
If there is someone who is both not sweet and superior, then Rex is not teeny.
Someone is sweet if and only if he is not teeny. | Halden is sweet. | neutral |
Traci is careful.
Robert is dangerous.
Mark is not superior.
Mark is cool.
Hunter is not sweet.
Hunter is not cool.
Hunter is teeny.
Kendrick is teeny.
Kendrick is dangerous.
Traci is not dangerous.
Traci is teeny.
Kendrick is careful.If there is at least one people who is both not teeny and dangerous, then Traci is not superior.
If Hunter is not dangerous and Robert is sweet, then Halden is not cool.
If someone is either not cool or not sweet, then he is not dangerous and not teeny.
Someone who is not sweet is always careful.
If there is someone who is both not dangerous and not sweet, then Rex is teeny.
If someone is not cool, then he is not superior, and vice versa.
All not dangerous people are not cool.
If someone is dangerous or he is not careful, then he is superior.
If someone is superior, then he is cool, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is dangerous, then Rex is not superior and Robert is not careful.
If there is someone who is both not sweet and superior, then Rex is not teeny.
Someone is sweet if and only if he is not teeny. | Mark is not superior. | self_contradiction |
Traci is careful.
Robert is dangerous.
Mark is not superior.
Mark is cool.
Hunter is not sweet.
Hunter is not cool.
Hunter is teeny.
Kendrick is teeny.
Kendrick is dangerous.
Traci is not dangerous.
Traci is teeny.
Kendrick is careful.If there is at least one people who is both not teeny and dangerous, then Traci is not superior.
If Hunter is not dangerous and Robert is sweet, then Halden is not cool.
If someone is either not cool or not sweet, then he is not dangerous and not teeny.
Someone who is not sweet is always careful.
If there is someone who is both not dangerous and not sweet, then Rex is teeny.
If someone is not cool, then he is not superior, and vice versa.
All not dangerous people are not cool.
If someone is dangerous or he is not careful, then he is superior.
If someone is superior, then he is cool, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is dangerous, then Rex is not superior and Robert is not careful.
If there is someone who is both not sweet and superior, then Rex is not teeny.
Someone is sweet if and only if he is not teeny. | Traci is not superior. | entailment |
Traci is careful.
Robert is dangerous.
Mark is not superior.
Mark is cool.
Hunter is not sweet.
Hunter is not cool.
Hunter is teeny.
Kendrick is teeny.
Kendrick is dangerous.
Traci is not dangerous.
Traci is teeny.
Kendrick is careful.If there is at least one people who is both not teeny and dangerous, then Traci is not superior.
If Hunter is not dangerous and Robert is sweet, then Halden is not cool.
If someone is either not cool or not sweet, then he is not dangerous and not teeny.
Someone who is not sweet is always careful.
If there is someone who is both not dangerous and not sweet, then Rex is teeny.
If someone is not cool, then he is not superior, and vice versa.
All not dangerous people are not cool.
If someone is dangerous or he is not careful, then he is superior.
If someone is superior, then he is cool, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is dangerous, then Rex is not superior and Robert is not careful.
If there is someone who is both not sweet and superior, then Rex is not teeny.
Someone is sweet if and only if he is not teeny. | Rex is not dangerous. | entailment |
Traci is careful.
Robert is dangerous.
Mark is not superior.
Mark is cool.
Hunter is not sweet.
Hunter is not cool.
Hunter is teeny.
Kendrick is teeny.
Kendrick is dangerous.
Traci is not dangerous.
Traci is teeny.
Kendrick is careful.If there is at least one people who is both not teeny and dangerous, then Traci is not superior.
If Hunter is not dangerous and Robert is sweet, then Halden is not cool.
If someone is either not cool or not sweet, then he is not dangerous and not teeny.
Someone who is not sweet is always careful.
If there is someone who is both not dangerous and not sweet, then Rex is teeny.
If someone is not cool, then he is not superior, and vice versa.
All not dangerous people are not cool.
If someone is dangerous or he is not careful, then he is superior.
If someone is superior, then he is cool, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is dangerous, then Rex is not superior and Robert is not careful.
If there is someone who is both not sweet and superior, then Rex is not teeny.
Someone is sweet if and only if he is not teeny. | Mark is cool. | self_contradiction |
Traci is careful.
Robert is dangerous.
Mark is not superior.
Mark is cool.
Hunter is not sweet.
Hunter is not cool.
Hunter is teeny.
Kendrick is teeny.
Kendrick is dangerous.
Traci is not dangerous.
Traci is teeny.
Kendrick is careful.If there is at least one people who is both not teeny and dangerous, then Traci is not superior.
If Hunter is not dangerous and Robert is sweet, then Halden is not cool.
If someone is either not cool or not sweet, then he is not dangerous and not teeny.
Someone who is not sweet is always careful.
If there is someone who is both not dangerous and not sweet, then Rex is teeny.
If someone is not cool, then he is not superior, and vice versa.
All not dangerous people are not cool.
If someone is dangerous or he is not careful, then he is superior.
If someone is superior, then he is cool, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is dangerous, then Rex is not superior and Robert is not careful.
If there is someone who is both not sweet and superior, then Rex is not teeny.
Someone is sweet if and only if he is not teeny. | Rex is superior. | contradiction |
Traci is careful.
Robert is dangerous.
Mark is not superior.
Mark is cool.
Hunter is not sweet.
Hunter is not cool.
Hunter is teeny.
Kendrick is teeny.
Kendrick is dangerous.
Traci is not dangerous.
Traci is teeny.
Kendrick is careful.If there is at least one people who is both not teeny and dangerous, then Traci is not superior.
If Hunter is not dangerous and Robert is sweet, then Halden is not cool.
If someone is either not cool or not sweet, then he is not dangerous and not teeny.
Someone who is not sweet is always careful.
If there is someone who is both not dangerous and not sweet, then Rex is teeny.
If someone is not cool, then he is not superior, and vice versa.
All not dangerous people are not cool.
If someone is dangerous or he is not careful, then he is superior.
If someone is superior, then he is cool, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is dangerous, then Rex is not superior and Robert is not careful.
If there is someone who is both not sweet and superior, then Rex is not teeny.
Someone is sweet if and only if he is not teeny. | Traci is not teeny. | self_contradiction |
Traci is careful.
Robert is dangerous.
Mark is not superior.
Mark is cool.
Hunter is not sweet.
Hunter is not cool.
Hunter is teeny.
Kendrick is teeny.
Kendrick is dangerous.
Traci is not dangerous.
Traci is teeny.
Kendrick is careful.If there is at least one people who is both not teeny and dangerous, then Traci is not superior.
If Hunter is not dangerous and Robert is sweet, then Halden is not cool.
If someone is either not cool or not sweet, then he is not dangerous and not teeny.
Someone who is not sweet is always careful.
If there is someone who is both not dangerous and not sweet, then Rex is teeny.
If someone is not cool, then he is not superior, and vice versa.
All not dangerous people are not cool.
If someone is dangerous or he is not careful, then he is superior.
If someone is superior, then he is cool, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is dangerous, then Rex is not superior and Robert is not careful.
If there is someone who is both not sweet and superior, then Rex is not teeny.
Someone is sweet if and only if he is not teeny. | Kendrick is careful. | entailment |
Traci is careful.
Robert is dangerous.
Mark is not superior.
Mark is cool.
Hunter is not sweet.
Hunter is not cool.
Hunter is teeny.
Kendrick is teeny.
Kendrick is dangerous.
Traci is not dangerous.
Traci is teeny.
Kendrick is careful.If there is at least one people who is both not teeny and dangerous, then Traci is not superior.
If Hunter is not dangerous and Robert is sweet, then Halden is not cool.
If someone is either not cool or not sweet, then he is not dangerous and not teeny.
Someone who is not sweet is always careful.
If there is someone who is both not dangerous and not sweet, then Rex is teeny.
If someone is not cool, then he is not superior, and vice versa.
All not dangerous people are not cool.
If someone is dangerous or he is not careful, then he is superior.
If someone is superior, then he is cool, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is dangerous, then Rex is not superior and Robert is not careful.
If there is someone who is both not sweet and superior, then Rex is not teeny.
Someone is sweet if and only if he is not teeny. | Robert is not cool. | contradiction |
Anthony is teeny.
Hamlin is not defeated.
Hamlin is concerned.
Claude is steep.
Jed is not rich.
Chester is teeny.
Kingston is not concerned.
Claude is not teeny.
Anthony is not rich.
Shelley is rich.
Shelley is concerned.
Claude is nervous.If there is nobody who is not not defeated, then Anthony is not teeny and Kingston is not steep.
Someone being not steep is equivalent to being not nervous.
If there is someone who is both not teeny and concerned, then Anthony is nervous.
Someone being not teeny is equivalent to being not concerned.
As long as someone is nervous, he is not steep and teeny.
If Chester is not steep and Chester is concerned, then Hamlin is defeated.
If Claude is not nervous, then Kingston is not teeny and Anthony is not defeated, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is nervous, then Hamlin is not steep.
Claude being teeny implies that Hamlin is not nervous.
If everyone is not concerned, then Kingston is rich.
If there is someone who is either concerned or teeny, then Hamlin is not defeated.
If there is someone who is not steep, then Hamlin is not defeated and Kingston is not rich. | Claude is not nervous. | self_contradiction |
Anthony is teeny.
Hamlin is not defeated.
Hamlin is concerned.
Claude is steep.
Jed is not rich.
Chester is teeny.
Kingston is not concerned.
Claude is not teeny.
Anthony is not rich.
Shelley is rich.
Shelley is concerned.
Claude is nervous.If there is nobody who is not not defeated, then Anthony is not teeny and Kingston is not steep.
Someone being not steep is equivalent to being not nervous.
If there is someone who is both not teeny and concerned, then Anthony is nervous.
Someone being not teeny is equivalent to being not concerned.
As long as someone is nervous, he is not steep and teeny.
If Chester is not steep and Chester is concerned, then Hamlin is defeated.
If Claude is not nervous, then Kingston is not teeny and Anthony is not defeated, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is nervous, then Hamlin is not steep.
Claude being teeny implies that Hamlin is not nervous.
If everyone is not concerned, then Kingston is rich.
If there is someone who is either concerned or teeny, then Hamlin is not defeated.
If there is someone who is not steep, then Hamlin is not defeated and Kingston is not rich. | Hamlin is steep. | contradiction |
Anthony is teeny.
Hamlin is not defeated.
Hamlin is concerned.
Claude is steep.
Jed is not rich.
Chester is teeny.
Kingston is not concerned.
Claude is not teeny.
Anthony is not rich.
Shelley is rich.
Shelley is concerned.
Claude is nervous.If there is nobody who is not not defeated, then Anthony is not teeny and Kingston is not steep.
Someone being not steep is equivalent to being not nervous.
If there is someone who is both not teeny and concerned, then Anthony is nervous.
Someone being not teeny is equivalent to being not concerned.
As long as someone is nervous, he is not steep and teeny.
If Chester is not steep and Chester is concerned, then Hamlin is defeated.
If Claude is not nervous, then Kingston is not teeny and Anthony is not defeated, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is nervous, then Hamlin is not steep.
Claude being teeny implies that Hamlin is not nervous.
If everyone is not concerned, then Kingston is rich.
If there is someone who is either concerned or teeny, then Hamlin is not defeated.
If there is someone who is not steep, then Hamlin is not defeated and Kingston is not rich. | Claude is not concerned. | entailment |
Anthony is teeny.
Hamlin is not defeated.
Hamlin is concerned.
Claude is steep.
Jed is not rich.
Chester is teeny.
Kingston is not concerned.
Claude is not teeny.
Anthony is not rich.
Shelley is rich.
Shelley is concerned.
Claude is nervous.If there is nobody who is not not defeated, then Anthony is not teeny and Kingston is not steep.
Someone being not steep is equivalent to being not nervous.
If there is someone who is both not teeny and concerned, then Anthony is nervous.
Someone being not teeny is equivalent to being not concerned.
As long as someone is nervous, he is not steep and teeny.
If Chester is not steep and Chester is concerned, then Hamlin is defeated.
If Claude is not nervous, then Kingston is not teeny and Anthony is not defeated, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is nervous, then Hamlin is not steep.
Claude being teeny implies that Hamlin is not nervous.
If everyone is not concerned, then Kingston is rich.
If there is someone who is either concerned or teeny, then Hamlin is not defeated.
If there is someone who is not steep, then Hamlin is not defeated and Kingston is not rich. | Anthony is steep. | neutral |
Anthony is teeny.
Hamlin is not defeated.
Hamlin is concerned.
Claude is steep.
Jed is not rich.
Chester is teeny.
Kingston is not concerned.
Claude is not teeny.
Anthony is not rich.
Shelley is rich.
Shelley is concerned.
Claude is nervous.If there is nobody who is not not defeated, then Anthony is not teeny and Kingston is not steep.
Someone being not steep is equivalent to being not nervous.
If there is someone who is both not teeny and concerned, then Anthony is nervous.
Someone being not teeny is equivalent to being not concerned.
As long as someone is nervous, he is not steep and teeny.
If Chester is not steep and Chester is concerned, then Hamlin is defeated.
If Claude is not nervous, then Kingston is not teeny and Anthony is not defeated, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is nervous, then Hamlin is not steep.
Claude being teeny implies that Hamlin is not nervous.
If everyone is not concerned, then Kingston is rich.
If there is someone who is either concerned or teeny, then Hamlin is not defeated.
If there is someone who is not steep, then Hamlin is not defeated and Kingston is not rich. | Jed is defeated. | neutral |
Anthony is teeny.
Hamlin is not defeated.
Hamlin is concerned.
Claude is steep.
Jed is not rich.
Chester is teeny.
Kingston is not concerned.
Claude is not teeny.
Anthony is not rich.
Shelley is rich.
Shelley is concerned.
Claude is nervous.If there is nobody who is not not defeated, then Anthony is not teeny and Kingston is not steep.
Someone being not steep is equivalent to being not nervous.
If there is someone who is both not teeny and concerned, then Anthony is nervous.
Someone being not teeny is equivalent to being not concerned.
As long as someone is nervous, he is not steep and teeny.
If Chester is not steep and Chester is concerned, then Hamlin is defeated.
If Claude is not nervous, then Kingston is not teeny and Anthony is not defeated, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is nervous, then Hamlin is not steep.
Claude being teeny implies that Hamlin is not nervous.
If everyone is not concerned, then Kingston is rich.
If there is someone who is either concerned or teeny, then Hamlin is not defeated.
If there is someone who is not steep, then Hamlin is not defeated and Kingston is not rich. | Claude is not teeny. | self_contradiction |
Anthony is teeny.
Hamlin is not defeated.
Hamlin is concerned.
Claude is steep.
Jed is not rich.
Chester is teeny.
Kingston is not concerned.
Claude is not teeny.
Anthony is not rich.
Shelley is rich.
Shelley is concerned.
Claude is nervous.If there is nobody who is not not defeated, then Anthony is not teeny and Kingston is not steep.
Someone being not steep is equivalent to being not nervous.
If there is someone who is both not teeny and concerned, then Anthony is nervous.
Someone being not teeny is equivalent to being not concerned.
As long as someone is nervous, he is not steep and teeny.
If Chester is not steep and Chester is concerned, then Hamlin is defeated.
If Claude is not nervous, then Kingston is not teeny and Anthony is not defeated, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is nervous, then Hamlin is not steep.
Claude being teeny implies that Hamlin is not nervous.
If everyone is not concerned, then Kingston is rich.
If there is someone who is either concerned or teeny, then Hamlin is not defeated.
If there is someone who is not steep, then Hamlin is not defeated and Kingston is not rich. | Claude is nervous. | self_contradiction |
Anthony is teeny.
Hamlin is not defeated.
Hamlin is concerned.
Claude is steep.
Jed is not rich.
Chester is teeny.
Kingston is not concerned.
Claude is not teeny.
Anthony is not rich.
Shelley is rich.
Shelley is concerned.
Claude is nervous.If there is nobody who is not not defeated, then Anthony is not teeny and Kingston is not steep.
Someone being not steep is equivalent to being not nervous.
If there is someone who is both not teeny and concerned, then Anthony is nervous.
Someone being not teeny is equivalent to being not concerned.
As long as someone is nervous, he is not steep and teeny.
If Chester is not steep and Chester is concerned, then Hamlin is defeated.
If Claude is not nervous, then Kingston is not teeny and Anthony is not defeated, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is nervous, then Hamlin is not steep.
Claude being teeny implies that Hamlin is not nervous.
If everyone is not concerned, then Kingston is rich.
If there is someone who is either concerned or teeny, then Hamlin is not defeated.
If there is someone who is not steep, then Hamlin is not defeated and Kingston is not rich. | Hamlin is defeated. | contradiction |
Anthony is teeny.
Hamlin is not defeated.
Hamlin is concerned.
Claude is steep.
Jed is not rich.
Chester is teeny.
Kingston is not concerned.
Claude is not teeny.
Anthony is not rich.
Shelley is rich.
Shelley is concerned.
Claude is nervous.If there is nobody who is not not defeated, then Anthony is not teeny and Kingston is not steep.
Someone being not steep is equivalent to being not nervous.
If there is someone who is both not teeny and concerned, then Anthony is nervous.
Someone being not teeny is equivalent to being not concerned.
As long as someone is nervous, he is not steep and teeny.
If Chester is not steep and Chester is concerned, then Hamlin is defeated.
If Claude is not nervous, then Kingston is not teeny and Anthony is not defeated, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is nervous, then Hamlin is not steep.
Claude being teeny implies that Hamlin is not nervous.
If everyone is not concerned, then Kingston is rich.
If there is someone who is either concerned or teeny, then Hamlin is not defeated.
If there is someone who is not steep, then Hamlin is not defeated and Kingston is not rich. | Kingston is teeny. | contradiction |
Anthony is teeny.
Hamlin is not defeated.
Hamlin is concerned.
Claude is steep.
Jed is not rich.
Chester is teeny.
Kingston is not concerned.
Claude is not teeny.
Anthony is not rich.
Shelley is rich.
Shelley is concerned.
Claude is nervous.If there is nobody who is not not defeated, then Anthony is not teeny and Kingston is not steep.
Someone being not steep is equivalent to being not nervous.
If there is someone who is both not teeny and concerned, then Anthony is nervous.
Someone being not teeny is equivalent to being not concerned.
As long as someone is nervous, he is not steep and teeny.
If Chester is not steep and Chester is concerned, then Hamlin is defeated.
If Claude is not nervous, then Kingston is not teeny and Anthony is not defeated, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is nervous, then Hamlin is not steep.
Claude being teeny implies that Hamlin is not nervous.
If everyone is not concerned, then Kingston is rich.
If there is someone who is either concerned or teeny, then Hamlin is not defeated.
If there is someone who is not steep, then Hamlin is not defeated and Kingston is not rich. | Chester is rich. | neutral |
Anthony is teeny.
Hamlin is not defeated.
Hamlin is concerned.
Claude is steep.
Jed is not rich.
Chester is teeny.
Kingston is not concerned.
Claude is not teeny.
Anthony is not rich.
Shelley is rich.
Shelley is concerned.
Claude is nervous.If there is nobody who is not not defeated, then Anthony is not teeny and Kingston is not steep.
Someone being not steep is equivalent to being not nervous.
If there is someone who is both not teeny and concerned, then Anthony is nervous.
Someone being not teeny is equivalent to being not concerned.
As long as someone is nervous, he is not steep and teeny.
If Chester is not steep and Chester is concerned, then Hamlin is defeated.
If Claude is not nervous, then Kingston is not teeny and Anthony is not defeated, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is nervous, then Hamlin is not steep.
Claude being teeny implies that Hamlin is not nervous.
If everyone is not concerned, then Kingston is rich.
If there is someone who is either concerned or teeny, then Hamlin is not defeated.
If there is someone who is not steep, then Hamlin is not defeated and Kingston is not rich. | Anthony is not defeated. | entailment |
Anthony is teeny.
Hamlin is not defeated.
Hamlin is concerned.
Claude is steep.
Jed is not rich.
Chester is teeny.
Kingston is not concerned.
Claude is not teeny.
Anthony is not rich.
Shelley is rich.
Shelley is concerned.
Claude is nervous.If there is nobody who is not not defeated, then Anthony is not teeny and Kingston is not steep.
Someone being not steep is equivalent to being not nervous.
If there is someone who is both not teeny and concerned, then Anthony is nervous.
Someone being not teeny is equivalent to being not concerned.
As long as someone is nervous, he is not steep and teeny.
If Chester is not steep and Chester is concerned, then Hamlin is defeated.
If Claude is not nervous, then Kingston is not teeny and Anthony is not defeated, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is nervous, then Hamlin is not steep.
Claude being teeny implies that Hamlin is not nervous.
If everyone is not concerned, then Kingston is rich.
If there is someone who is either concerned or teeny, then Hamlin is not defeated.
If there is someone who is not steep, then Hamlin is not defeated and Kingston is not rich. | Jed is not nervous. | neutral |
Anthony is teeny.
Hamlin is not defeated.
Hamlin is concerned.
Claude is steep.
Jed is not rich.
Chester is teeny.
Kingston is not concerned.
Claude is not teeny.
Anthony is not rich.
Shelley is rich.
Shelley is concerned.
Claude is nervous.If there is nobody who is not not defeated, then Anthony is not teeny and Kingston is not steep.
Someone being not steep is equivalent to being not nervous.
If there is someone who is both not teeny and concerned, then Anthony is nervous.
Someone being not teeny is equivalent to being not concerned.
As long as someone is nervous, he is not steep and teeny.
If Chester is not steep and Chester is concerned, then Hamlin is defeated.
If Claude is not nervous, then Kingston is not teeny and Anthony is not defeated, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is nervous, then Hamlin is not steep.
Claude being teeny implies that Hamlin is not nervous.
If everyone is not concerned, then Kingston is rich.
If there is someone who is either concerned or teeny, then Hamlin is not defeated.
If there is someone who is not steep, then Hamlin is not defeated and Kingston is not rich. | Kingston is concerned. | contradiction |
Anthony is teeny.
Hamlin is not defeated.
Hamlin is concerned.
Claude is steep.
Jed is not rich.
Chester is teeny.
Kingston is not concerned.
Claude is not teeny.
Anthony is not rich.
Shelley is rich.
Shelley is concerned.
Claude is nervous.If there is nobody who is not not defeated, then Anthony is not teeny and Kingston is not steep.
Someone being not steep is equivalent to being not nervous.
If there is someone who is both not teeny and concerned, then Anthony is nervous.
Someone being not teeny is equivalent to being not concerned.
As long as someone is nervous, he is not steep and teeny.
If Chester is not steep and Chester is concerned, then Hamlin is defeated.
If Claude is not nervous, then Kingston is not teeny and Anthony is not defeated, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is nervous, then Hamlin is not steep.
Claude being teeny implies that Hamlin is not nervous.
If everyone is not concerned, then Kingston is rich.
If there is someone who is either concerned or teeny, then Hamlin is not defeated.
If there is someone who is not steep, then Hamlin is not defeated and Kingston is not rich. | Chester is teeny. | entailment |
Anthony is teeny.
Hamlin is not defeated.
Hamlin is concerned.
Claude is steep.
Jed is not rich.
Chester is teeny.
Kingston is not concerned.
Claude is not teeny.
Anthony is not rich.
Shelley is rich.
Shelley is concerned.
Claude is nervous.If there is nobody who is not not defeated, then Anthony is not teeny and Kingston is not steep.
Someone being not steep is equivalent to being not nervous.
If there is someone who is both not teeny and concerned, then Anthony is nervous.
Someone being not teeny is equivalent to being not concerned.
As long as someone is nervous, he is not steep and teeny.
If Chester is not steep and Chester is concerned, then Hamlin is defeated.
If Claude is not nervous, then Kingston is not teeny and Anthony is not defeated, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is nervous, then Hamlin is not steep.
Claude being teeny implies that Hamlin is not nervous.
If everyone is not concerned, then Kingston is rich.
If there is someone who is either concerned or teeny, then Hamlin is not defeated.
If there is someone who is not steep, then Hamlin is not defeated and Kingston is not rich. | Claude is not rich. | neutral |
Anthony is teeny.
Hamlin is not defeated.
Hamlin is concerned.
Claude is steep.
Jed is not rich.
Chester is teeny.
Kingston is not concerned.
Claude is not teeny.
Anthony is not rich.
Shelley is rich.
Shelley is concerned.
Claude is nervous.If there is nobody who is not not defeated, then Anthony is not teeny and Kingston is not steep.
Someone being not steep is equivalent to being not nervous.
If there is someone who is both not teeny and concerned, then Anthony is nervous.
Someone being not teeny is equivalent to being not concerned.
As long as someone is nervous, he is not steep and teeny.
If Chester is not steep and Chester is concerned, then Hamlin is defeated.
If Claude is not nervous, then Kingston is not teeny and Anthony is not defeated, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is nervous, then Hamlin is not steep.
Claude being teeny implies that Hamlin is not nervous.
If everyone is not concerned, then Kingston is rich.
If there is someone who is either concerned or teeny, then Hamlin is not defeated.
If there is someone who is not steep, then Hamlin is not defeated and Kingston is not rich. | Anthony is defeated. | contradiction |
Anthony is teeny.
Hamlin is not defeated.
Hamlin is concerned.
Claude is steep.
Jed is not rich.
Chester is teeny.
Kingston is not concerned.
Claude is not teeny.
Anthony is not rich.
Shelley is rich.
Shelley is concerned.
Claude is nervous.If there is nobody who is not not defeated, then Anthony is not teeny and Kingston is not steep.
Someone being not steep is equivalent to being not nervous.
If there is someone who is both not teeny and concerned, then Anthony is nervous.
Someone being not teeny is equivalent to being not concerned.
As long as someone is nervous, he is not steep and teeny.
If Chester is not steep and Chester is concerned, then Hamlin is defeated.
If Claude is not nervous, then Kingston is not teeny and Anthony is not defeated, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is nervous, then Hamlin is not steep.
Claude being teeny implies that Hamlin is not nervous.
If everyone is not concerned, then Kingston is rich.
If there is someone who is either concerned or teeny, then Hamlin is not defeated.
If there is someone who is not steep, then Hamlin is not defeated and Kingston is not rich. | Claude is steep. | self_contradiction |
Anthony is teeny.
Hamlin is not defeated.
Hamlin is concerned.
Claude is steep.
Jed is not rich.
Chester is teeny.
Kingston is not concerned.
Claude is not teeny.
Anthony is not rich.
Shelley is rich.
Shelley is concerned.
Claude is nervous.If there is nobody who is not not defeated, then Anthony is not teeny and Kingston is not steep.
Someone being not steep is equivalent to being not nervous.
If there is someone who is both not teeny and concerned, then Anthony is nervous.
Someone being not teeny is equivalent to being not concerned.
As long as someone is nervous, he is not steep and teeny.
If Chester is not steep and Chester is concerned, then Hamlin is defeated.
If Claude is not nervous, then Kingston is not teeny and Anthony is not defeated, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is nervous, then Hamlin is not steep.
Claude being teeny implies that Hamlin is not nervous.
If everyone is not concerned, then Kingston is rich.
If there is someone who is either concerned or teeny, then Hamlin is not defeated.
If there is someone who is not steep, then Hamlin is not defeated and Kingston is not rich. | Hamlin is not defeated. | entailment |
Anthony is teeny.
Hamlin is not defeated.
Hamlin is concerned.
Claude is steep.
Jed is not rich.
Chester is teeny.
Kingston is not concerned.
Claude is not teeny.
Anthony is not rich.
Shelley is rich.
Shelley is concerned.
Claude is nervous.If there is nobody who is not not defeated, then Anthony is not teeny and Kingston is not steep.
Someone being not steep is equivalent to being not nervous.
If there is someone who is both not teeny and concerned, then Anthony is nervous.
Someone being not teeny is equivalent to being not concerned.
As long as someone is nervous, he is not steep and teeny.
If Chester is not steep and Chester is concerned, then Hamlin is defeated.
If Claude is not nervous, then Kingston is not teeny and Anthony is not defeated, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is nervous, then Hamlin is not steep.
Claude being teeny implies that Hamlin is not nervous.
If everyone is not concerned, then Kingston is rich.
If there is someone who is either concerned or teeny, then Hamlin is not defeated.
If there is someone who is not steep, then Hamlin is not defeated and Kingston is not rich. | Hamlin is concerned. | entailment |
Anthony is teeny.
Hamlin is not defeated.
Hamlin is concerned.
Claude is steep.
Jed is not rich.
Chester is teeny.
Kingston is not concerned.
Claude is not teeny.
Anthony is not rich.
Shelley is rich.
Shelley is concerned.
Claude is nervous.If there is nobody who is not not defeated, then Anthony is not teeny and Kingston is not steep.
Someone being not steep is equivalent to being not nervous.
If there is someone who is both not teeny and concerned, then Anthony is nervous.
Someone being not teeny is equivalent to being not concerned.
As long as someone is nervous, he is not steep and teeny.
If Chester is not steep and Chester is concerned, then Hamlin is defeated.
If Claude is not nervous, then Kingston is not teeny and Anthony is not defeated, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is nervous, then Hamlin is not steep.
Claude being teeny implies that Hamlin is not nervous.
If everyone is not concerned, then Kingston is rich.
If there is someone who is either concerned or teeny, then Hamlin is not defeated.
If there is someone who is not steep, then Hamlin is not defeated and Kingston is not rich. | Claude is not steep. | self_contradiction |
Angus is odd.
Clifford is lucky.
Clifford is not open.
Clifford is not odd.
Angus is not fresh.
Peter is skinny.
Isaac is not skinny.
Ramsey is not skinny.
Aidan is fresh.
Peter is not open.
Ramsey is not open.
Peter is not odd.Someone who is eithor not open or not lucky is always neat.
If there is at least one people who is both not neat and lucky, then Ramsey is not open.
Ramsey being not open and Angus being not lucky imply that Brian is neat.
Someone who is not open and skinny is always not neat and odd.
It can be concluded that Brian is odd once knowing that Isaac is not skinny.
If there is at least one people who is not fresh, then Isaac is lucky and Clifford is not neat.
If someone is both open and not lucky, then he is skinny.
If someone is not fresh or he is not neat, then he is not skinny.
Someone is lucky and not odd if and only if he is not neat.
Someone who is not neat is always both not odd and not fresh.
It can be concluded that Brian is fresh and Clifford is odd once knowing that Angus is open.
If someone is not lucky and not neat, then he is not open, and vice versa. | Isaac is lucky. | entailment |
Angus is odd.
Clifford is lucky.
Clifford is not open.
Clifford is not odd.
Angus is not fresh.
Peter is skinny.
Isaac is not skinny.
Ramsey is not skinny.
Aidan is fresh.
Peter is not open.
Ramsey is not open.
Peter is not odd.Someone who is eithor not open or not lucky is always neat.
If there is at least one people who is both not neat and lucky, then Ramsey is not open.
Ramsey being not open and Angus being not lucky imply that Brian is neat.
Someone who is not open and skinny is always not neat and odd.
It can be concluded that Brian is odd once knowing that Isaac is not skinny.
If there is at least one people who is not fresh, then Isaac is lucky and Clifford is not neat.
If someone is both open and not lucky, then he is skinny.
If someone is not fresh or he is not neat, then he is not skinny.
Someone is lucky and not odd if and only if he is not neat.
Someone who is not neat is always both not odd and not fresh.
It can be concluded that Brian is fresh and Clifford is odd once knowing that Angus is open.
If someone is not lucky and not neat, then he is not open, and vice versa. | Aidan is not fresh. | contradiction |
Angus is odd.
Clifford is lucky.
Clifford is not open.
Clifford is not odd.
Angus is not fresh.
Peter is skinny.
Isaac is not skinny.
Ramsey is not skinny.
Aidan is fresh.
Peter is not open.
Ramsey is not open.
Peter is not odd.Someone who is eithor not open or not lucky is always neat.
If there is at least one people who is both not neat and lucky, then Ramsey is not open.
Ramsey being not open and Angus being not lucky imply that Brian is neat.
Someone who is not open and skinny is always not neat and odd.
It can be concluded that Brian is odd once knowing that Isaac is not skinny.
If there is at least one people who is not fresh, then Isaac is lucky and Clifford is not neat.
If someone is both open and not lucky, then he is skinny.
If someone is not fresh or he is not neat, then he is not skinny.
Someone is lucky and not odd if and only if he is not neat.
Someone who is not neat is always both not odd and not fresh.
It can be concluded that Brian is fresh and Clifford is odd once knowing that Angus is open.
If someone is not lucky and not neat, then he is not open, and vice versa. | Angus is not skinny. | entailment |
Angus is odd.
Clifford is lucky.
Clifford is not open.
Clifford is not odd.
Angus is not fresh.
Peter is skinny.
Isaac is not skinny.
Ramsey is not skinny.
Aidan is fresh.
Peter is not open.
Ramsey is not open.
Peter is not odd.Someone who is eithor not open or not lucky is always neat.
If there is at least one people who is both not neat and lucky, then Ramsey is not open.
Ramsey being not open and Angus being not lucky imply that Brian is neat.
Someone who is not open and skinny is always not neat and odd.
It can be concluded that Brian is odd once knowing that Isaac is not skinny.
If there is at least one people who is not fresh, then Isaac is lucky and Clifford is not neat.
If someone is both open and not lucky, then he is skinny.
If someone is not fresh or he is not neat, then he is not skinny.
Someone is lucky and not odd if and only if he is not neat.
Someone who is not neat is always both not odd and not fresh.
It can be concluded that Brian is fresh and Clifford is odd once knowing that Angus is open.
If someone is not lucky and not neat, then he is not open, and vice versa. | Ramsey is not fresh. | entailment |
Angus is odd.
Clifford is lucky.
Clifford is not open.
Clifford is not odd.
Angus is not fresh.
Peter is skinny.
Isaac is not skinny.
Ramsey is not skinny.
Aidan is fresh.
Peter is not open.
Ramsey is not open.
Peter is not odd.Someone who is eithor not open or not lucky is always neat.
If there is at least one people who is both not neat and lucky, then Ramsey is not open.
Ramsey being not open and Angus being not lucky imply that Brian is neat.
Someone who is not open and skinny is always not neat and odd.
It can be concluded that Brian is odd once knowing that Isaac is not skinny.
If there is at least one people who is not fresh, then Isaac is lucky and Clifford is not neat.
If someone is both open and not lucky, then he is skinny.
If someone is not fresh or he is not neat, then he is not skinny.
Someone is lucky and not odd if and only if he is not neat.
Someone who is not neat is always both not odd and not fresh.
It can be concluded that Brian is fresh and Clifford is odd once knowing that Angus is open.
If someone is not lucky and not neat, then he is not open, and vice versa. | Aidan is not neat. | neutral |
Angus is odd.
Clifford is lucky.
Clifford is not open.
Clifford is not odd.
Angus is not fresh.
Peter is skinny.
Isaac is not skinny.
Ramsey is not skinny.
Aidan is fresh.
Peter is not open.
Ramsey is not open.
Peter is not odd.Someone who is eithor not open or not lucky is always neat.
If there is at least one people who is both not neat and lucky, then Ramsey is not open.
Ramsey being not open and Angus being not lucky imply that Brian is neat.
Someone who is not open and skinny is always not neat and odd.
It can be concluded that Brian is odd once knowing that Isaac is not skinny.
If there is at least one people who is not fresh, then Isaac is lucky and Clifford is not neat.
If someone is both open and not lucky, then he is skinny.
If someone is not fresh or he is not neat, then he is not skinny.
Someone is lucky and not odd if and only if he is not neat.
Someone who is not neat is always both not odd and not fresh.
It can be concluded that Brian is fresh and Clifford is odd once knowing that Angus is open.
If someone is not lucky and not neat, then he is not open, and vice versa. | Clifford is not open. | entailment |
Angus is odd.
Clifford is lucky.
Clifford is not open.
Clifford is not odd.
Angus is not fresh.
Peter is skinny.
Isaac is not skinny.
Ramsey is not skinny.
Aidan is fresh.
Peter is not open.
Ramsey is not open.
Peter is not odd.Someone who is eithor not open or not lucky is always neat.
If there is at least one people who is both not neat and lucky, then Ramsey is not open.
Ramsey being not open and Angus being not lucky imply that Brian is neat.
Someone who is not open and skinny is always not neat and odd.
It can be concluded that Brian is odd once knowing that Isaac is not skinny.
If there is at least one people who is not fresh, then Isaac is lucky and Clifford is not neat.
If someone is both open and not lucky, then he is skinny.
If someone is not fresh or he is not neat, then he is not skinny.
Someone is lucky and not odd if and only if he is not neat.
Someone who is not neat is always both not odd and not fresh.
It can be concluded that Brian is fresh and Clifford is odd once knowing that Angus is open.
If someone is not lucky and not neat, then he is not open, and vice versa. | Isaac is not open. | neutral |
Angus is odd.
Clifford is lucky.
Clifford is not open.
Clifford is not odd.
Angus is not fresh.
Peter is skinny.
Isaac is not skinny.
Ramsey is not skinny.
Aidan is fresh.
Peter is not open.
Ramsey is not open.
Peter is not odd.Someone who is eithor not open or not lucky is always neat.
If there is at least one people who is both not neat and lucky, then Ramsey is not open.
Ramsey being not open and Angus being not lucky imply that Brian is neat.
Someone who is not open and skinny is always not neat and odd.
It can be concluded that Brian is odd once knowing that Isaac is not skinny.
If there is at least one people who is not fresh, then Isaac is lucky and Clifford is not neat.
If someone is both open and not lucky, then he is skinny.
If someone is not fresh or he is not neat, then he is not skinny.
Someone is lucky and not odd if and only if he is not neat.
Someone who is not neat is always both not odd and not fresh.
It can be concluded that Brian is fresh and Clifford is odd once knowing that Angus is open.
If someone is not lucky and not neat, then he is not open, and vice versa. | Angus is skinny. | contradiction |
Angus is odd.
Clifford is lucky.
Clifford is not open.
Clifford is not odd.
Angus is not fresh.
Peter is skinny.
Isaac is not skinny.
Ramsey is not skinny.
Aidan is fresh.
Peter is not open.
Ramsey is not open.
Peter is not odd.Someone who is eithor not open or not lucky is always neat.
If there is at least one people who is both not neat and lucky, then Ramsey is not open.
Ramsey being not open and Angus being not lucky imply that Brian is neat.
Someone who is not open and skinny is always not neat and odd.
It can be concluded that Brian is odd once knowing that Isaac is not skinny.
If there is at least one people who is not fresh, then Isaac is lucky and Clifford is not neat.
If someone is both open and not lucky, then he is skinny.
If someone is not fresh or he is not neat, then he is not skinny.
Someone is lucky and not odd if and only if he is not neat.
Someone who is not neat is always both not odd and not fresh.
It can be concluded that Brian is fresh and Clifford is odd once knowing that Angus is open.
If someone is not lucky and not neat, then he is not open, and vice versa. | Aidan is neat. | neutral |
Angus is odd.
Clifford is lucky.
Clifford is not open.
Clifford is not odd.
Angus is not fresh.
Peter is skinny.
Isaac is not skinny.
Ramsey is not skinny.
Aidan is fresh.
Peter is not open.
Ramsey is not open.
Peter is not odd.Someone who is eithor not open or not lucky is always neat.
If there is at least one people who is both not neat and lucky, then Ramsey is not open.
Ramsey being not open and Angus being not lucky imply that Brian is neat.
Someone who is not open and skinny is always not neat and odd.
It can be concluded that Brian is odd once knowing that Isaac is not skinny.
If there is at least one people who is not fresh, then Isaac is lucky and Clifford is not neat.
If someone is both open and not lucky, then he is skinny.
If someone is not fresh or he is not neat, then he is not skinny.
Someone is lucky and not odd if and only if he is not neat.
Someone who is not neat is always both not odd and not fresh.
It can be concluded that Brian is fresh and Clifford is odd once knowing that Angus is open.
If someone is not lucky and not neat, then he is not open, and vice versa. | Aidan is not skinny. | neutral |
Angus is odd.
Clifford is lucky.
Clifford is not open.
Clifford is not odd.
Angus is not fresh.
Peter is skinny.
Isaac is not skinny.
Ramsey is not skinny.
Aidan is fresh.
Peter is not open.
Ramsey is not open.
Peter is not odd.Someone who is eithor not open or not lucky is always neat.
If there is at least one people who is both not neat and lucky, then Ramsey is not open.
Ramsey being not open and Angus being not lucky imply that Brian is neat.
Someone who is not open and skinny is always not neat and odd.
It can be concluded that Brian is odd once knowing that Isaac is not skinny.
If there is at least one people who is not fresh, then Isaac is lucky and Clifford is not neat.
If someone is both open and not lucky, then he is skinny.
If someone is not fresh or he is not neat, then he is not skinny.
Someone is lucky and not odd if and only if he is not neat.
Someone who is not neat is always both not odd and not fresh.
It can be concluded that Brian is fresh and Clifford is odd once knowing that Angus is open.
If someone is not lucky and not neat, then he is not open, and vice versa. | Isaac is open. | neutral |
Angus is odd.
Clifford is lucky.
Clifford is not open.
Clifford is not odd.
Angus is not fresh.
Peter is skinny.
Isaac is not skinny.
Ramsey is not skinny.
Aidan is fresh.
Peter is not open.
Ramsey is not open.
Peter is not odd.Someone who is eithor not open or not lucky is always neat.
If there is at least one people who is both not neat and lucky, then Ramsey is not open.
Ramsey being not open and Angus being not lucky imply that Brian is neat.
Someone who is not open and skinny is always not neat and odd.
It can be concluded that Brian is odd once knowing that Isaac is not skinny.
If there is at least one people who is not fresh, then Isaac is lucky and Clifford is not neat.
If someone is both open and not lucky, then he is skinny.
If someone is not fresh or he is not neat, then he is not skinny.
Someone is lucky and not odd if and only if he is not neat.
Someone who is not neat is always both not odd and not fresh.
It can be concluded that Brian is fresh and Clifford is odd once knowing that Angus is open.
If someone is not lucky and not neat, then he is not open, and vice versa. | Ramsey is fresh. | contradiction |
Angus is odd.
Clifford is lucky.
Clifford is not open.
Clifford is not odd.
Angus is not fresh.
Peter is skinny.
Isaac is not skinny.
Ramsey is not skinny.
Aidan is fresh.
Peter is not open.
Ramsey is not open.
Peter is not odd.Someone who is eithor not open or not lucky is always neat.
If there is at least one people who is both not neat and lucky, then Ramsey is not open.
Ramsey being not open and Angus being not lucky imply that Brian is neat.
Someone who is not open and skinny is always not neat and odd.
It can be concluded that Brian is odd once knowing that Isaac is not skinny.
If there is at least one people who is not fresh, then Isaac is lucky and Clifford is not neat.
If someone is both open and not lucky, then he is skinny.
If someone is not fresh or he is not neat, then he is not skinny.
Someone is lucky and not odd if and only if he is not neat.
Someone who is not neat is always both not odd and not fresh.
It can be concluded that Brian is fresh and Clifford is odd once knowing that Angus is open.
If someone is not lucky and not neat, then he is not open, and vice versa. | Peter is neat. | self_contradiction |
Angus is odd.
Clifford is lucky.
Clifford is not open.
Clifford is not odd.
Angus is not fresh.
Peter is skinny.
Isaac is not skinny.
Ramsey is not skinny.
Aidan is fresh.
Peter is not open.
Ramsey is not open.
Peter is not odd.Someone who is eithor not open or not lucky is always neat.
If there is at least one people who is both not neat and lucky, then Ramsey is not open.
Ramsey being not open and Angus being not lucky imply that Brian is neat.
Someone who is not open and skinny is always not neat and odd.
It can be concluded that Brian is odd once knowing that Isaac is not skinny.
If there is at least one people who is not fresh, then Isaac is lucky and Clifford is not neat.
If someone is both open and not lucky, then he is skinny.
If someone is not fresh or he is not neat, then he is not skinny.
Someone is lucky and not odd if and only if he is not neat.
Someone who is not neat is always both not odd and not fresh.
It can be concluded that Brian is fresh and Clifford is odd once knowing that Angus is open.
If someone is not lucky and not neat, then he is not open, and vice versa. | Angus is fresh. | contradiction |
Angus is odd.
Clifford is lucky.
Clifford is not open.
Clifford is not odd.
Angus is not fresh.
Peter is skinny.
Isaac is not skinny.
Ramsey is not skinny.
Aidan is fresh.
Peter is not open.
Ramsey is not open.
Peter is not odd.Someone who is eithor not open or not lucky is always neat.
If there is at least one people who is both not neat and lucky, then Ramsey is not open.
Ramsey being not open and Angus being not lucky imply that Brian is neat.
Someone who is not open and skinny is always not neat and odd.
It can be concluded that Brian is odd once knowing that Isaac is not skinny.
If there is at least one people who is not fresh, then Isaac is lucky and Clifford is not neat.
If someone is both open and not lucky, then he is skinny.
If someone is not fresh or he is not neat, then he is not skinny.
Someone is lucky and not odd if and only if he is not neat.
Someone who is not neat is always both not odd and not fresh.
It can be concluded that Brian is fresh and Clifford is odd once knowing that Angus is open.
If someone is not lucky and not neat, then he is not open, and vice versa. | Clifford is not neat. | self_contradiction |
Angus is odd.
Clifford is lucky.
Clifford is not open.
Clifford is not odd.
Angus is not fresh.
Peter is skinny.
Isaac is not skinny.
Ramsey is not skinny.
Aidan is fresh.
Peter is not open.
Ramsey is not open.
Peter is not odd.Someone who is eithor not open or not lucky is always neat.
If there is at least one people who is both not neat and lucky, then Ramsey is not open.
Ramsey being not open and Angus being not lucky imply that Brian is neat.
Someone who is not open and skinny is always not neat and odd.
It can be concluded that Brian is odd once knowing that Isaac is not skinny.
If there is at least one people who is not fresh, then Isaac is lucky and Clifford is not neat.
If someone is both open and not lucky, then he is skinny.
If someone is not fresh or he is not neat, then he is not skinny.
Someone is lucky and not odd if and only if he is not neat.
Someone who is not neat is always both not odd and not fresh.
It can be concluded that Brian is fresh and Clifford is odd once knowing that Angus is open.
If someone is not lucky and not neat, then he is not open, and vice versa. | Peter is not odd. | self_contradiction |
Angus is odd.
Clifford is lucky.
Clifford is not open.
Clifford is not odd.
Angus is not fresh.
Peter is skinny.
Isaac is not skinny.
Ramsey is not skinny.
Aidan is fresh.
Peter is not open.
Ramsey is not open.
Peter is not odd.Someone who is eithor not open or not lucky is always neat.
If there is at least one people who is both not neat and lucky, then Ramsey is not open.
Ramsey being not open and Angus being not lucky imply that Brian is neat.
Someone who is not open and skinny is always not neat and odd.
It can be concluded that Brian is odd once knowing that Isaac is not skinny.
If there is at least one people who is not fresh, then Isaac is lucky and Clifford is not neat.
If someone is both open and not lucky, then he is skinny.
If someone is not fresh or he is not neat, then he is not skinny.
Someone is lucky and not odd if and only if he is not neat.
Someone who is not neat is always both not odd and not fresh.
It can be concluded that Brian is fresh and Clifford is odd once knowing that Angus is open.
If someone is not lucky and not neat, then he is not open, and vice versa. | Peter is odd. | self_contradiction |
Angus is odd.
Clifford is lucky.
Clifford is not open.
Clifford is not odd.
Angus is not fresh.
Peter is skinny.
Isaac is not skinny.
Ramsey is not skinny.
Aidan is fresh.
Peter is not open.
Ramsey is not open.
Peter is not odd.Someone who is eithor not open or not lucky is always neat.
If there is at least one people who is both not neat and lucky, then Ramsey is not open.
Ramsey being not open and Angus being not lucky imply that Brian is neat.
Someone who is not open and skinny is always not neat and odd.
It can be concluded that Brian is odd once knowing that Isaac is not skinny.
If there is at least one people who is not fresh, then Isaac is lucky and Clifford is not neat.
If someone is both open and not lucky, then he is skinny.
If someone is not fresh or he is not neat, then he is not skinny.
Someone is lucky and not odd if and only if he is not neat.
Someone who is not neat is always both not odd and not fresh.
It can be concluded that Brian is fresh and Clifford is odd once knowing that Angus is open.
If someone is not lucky and not neat, then he is not open, and vice versa. | Angus is not fresh. | entailment |
Angus is odd.
Clifford is lucky.
Clifford is not open.
Clifford is not odd.
Angus is not fresh.
Peter is skinny.
Isaac is not skinny.
Ramsey is not skinny.
Aidan is fresh.
Peter is not open.
Ramsey is not open.
Peter is not odd.Someone who is eithor not open or not lucky is always neat.
If there is at least one people who is both not neat and lucky, then Ramsey is not open.
Ramsey being not open and Angus being not lucky imply that Brian is neat.
Someone who is not open and skinny is always not neat and odd.
It can be concluded that Brian is odd once knowing that Isaac is not skinny.
If there is at least one people who is not fresh, then Isaac is lucky and Clifford is not neat.
If someone is both open and not lucky, then he is skinny.
If someone is not fresh or he is not neat, then he is not skinny.
Someone is lucky and not odd if and only if he is not neat.
Someone who is not neat is always both not odd and not fresh.
It can be concluded that Brian is fresh and Clifford is odd once knowing that Angus is open.
If someone is not lucky and not neat, then he is not open, and vice versa. | Peter is lucky. | self_contradiction |
Angus is odd.
Clifford is lucky.
Clifford is not open.
Clifford is not odd.
Angus is not fresh.
Peter is skinny.
Isaac is not skinny.
Ramsey is not skinny.
Aidan is fresh.
Peter is not open.
Ramsey is not open.
Peter is not odd.Someone who is eithor not open or not lucky is always neat.
If there is at least one people who is both not neat and lucky, then Ramsey is not open.
Ramsey being not open and Angus being not lucky imply that Brian is neat.
Someone who is not open and skinny is always not neat and odd.
It can be concluded that Brian is odd once knowing that Isaac is not skinny.
If there is at least one people who is not fresh, then Isaac is lucky and Clifford is not neat.
If someone is both open and not lucky, then he is skinny.
If someone is not fresh or he is not neat, then he is not skinny.
Someone is lucky and not odd if and only if he is not neat.
Someone who is not neat is always both not odd and not fresh.
It can be concluded that Brian is fresh and Clifford is odd once knowing that Angus is open.
If someone is not lucky and not neat, then he is not open, and vice versa. | Clifford is fresh. | contradiction |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.