premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Kimberly is not impartial.
Bryant is not impartial.
Bruce is not impartial.
Bryant is healthy.
Thomas is small.
Philbert is small.
Carroll is naughty.
Bruce is not naughty.
Kimberly is not naughty.
Quillan is not naughty.
Thomas is not impartial.
Bryant is not small.If someone is naughty and not impartial, then he is both small and not wet, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not impartial or not naughty, then Philbert is not small.
As long as someone is not small, he is impartial and not healthy.
It can be concluded that Carroll is impartial once knowing that Bruce is not naughty.
Philbert being not naughty is equivalent to Kimberly being impartial.
If there is someone who is both impartial and wet, then Kimberly is not naughty.
If Kimberly is wet, then Quillan is healthy and Philbert is not impartial, and vice versa.
Someone who is impartial is always both not small and not healthy.
Philbert is wet if and only if Kimberly is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is not naughty, then Quillan is not wet and Thomas is not small.
Someone being both not small and naughty is equivalent to being not wet.
If someone is naughty or he is not small, then he is not solid. | Bruce is solid. | neutral |
Kimberly is not impartial.
Bryant is not impartial.
Bruce is not impartial.
Bryant is healthy.
Thomas is small.
Philbert is small.
Carroll is naughty.
Bruce is not naughty.
Kimberly is not naughty.
Quillan is not naughty.
Thomas is not impartial.
Bryant is not small.If someone is naughty and not impartial, then he is both small and not wet, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not impartial or not naughty, then Philbert is not small.
As long as someone is not small, he is impartial and not healthy.
It can be concluded that Carroll is impartial once knowing that Bruce is not naughty.
Philbert being not naughty is equivalent to Kimberly being impartial.
If there is someone who is both impartial and wet, then Kimberly is not naughty.
If Kimberly is wet, then Quillan is healthy and Philbert is not impartial, and vice versa.
Someone who is impartial is always both not small and not healthy.
Philbert is wet if and only if Kimberly is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is not naughty, then Quillan is not wet and Thomas is not small.
Someone being both not small and naughty is equivalent to being not wet.
If someone is naughty or he is not small, then he is not solid. | Quillan is wet. | contradiction |
Kimberly is not impartial.
Bryant is not impartial.
Bruce is not impartial.
Bryant is healthy.
Thomas is small.
Philbert is small.
Carroll is naughty.
Bruce is not naughty.
Kimberly is not naughty.
Quillan is not naughty.
Thomas is not impartial.
Bryant is not small.If someone is naughty and not impartial, then he is both small and not wet, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not impartial or not naughty, then Philbert is not small.
As long as someone is not small, he is impartial and not healthy.
It can be concluded that Carroll is impartial once knowing that Bruce is not naughty.
Philbert being not naughty is equivalent to Kimberly being impartial.
If there is someone who is both impartial and wet, then Kimberly is not naughty.
If Kimberly is wet, then Quillan is healthy and Philbert is not impartial, and vice versa.
Someone who is impartial is always both not small and not healthy.
Philbert is wet if and only if Kimberly is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is not naughty, then Quillan is not wet and Thomas is not small.
Someone being both not small and naughty is equivalent to being not wet.
If someone is naughty or he is not small, then he is not solid. | Kimberly is healthy. | neutral |
Kimberly is not impartial.
Bryant is not impartial.
Bruce is not impartial.
Bryant is healthy.
Thomas is small.
Philbert is small.
Carroll is naughty.
Bruce is not naughty.
Kimberly is not naughty.
Quillan is not naughty.
Thomas is not impartial.
Bryant is not small.If someone is naughty and not impartial, then he is both small and not wet, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not impartial or not naughty, then Philbert is not small.
As long as someone is not small, he is impartial and not healthy.
It can be concluded that Carroll is impartial once knowing that Bruce is not naughty.
Philbert being not naughty is equivalent to Kimberly being impartial.
If there is someone who is both impartial and wet, then Kimberly is not naughty.
If Kimberly is wet, then Quillan is healthy and Philbert is not impartial, and vice versa.
Someone who is impartial is always both not small and not healthy.
Philbert is wet if and only if Kimberly is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is not naughty, then Quillan is not wet and Thomas is not small.
Someone being both not small and naughty is equivalent to being not wet.
If someone is naughty or he is not small, then he is not solid. | Thomas is not small. | self_contradiction |
Kimberly is not impartial.
Bryant is not impartial.
Bruce is not impartial.
Bryant is healthy.
Thomas is small.
Philbert is small.
Carroll is naughty.
Bruce is not naughty.
Kimberly is not naughty.
Quillan is not naughty.
Thomas is not impartial.
Bryant is not small.If someone is naughty and not impartial, then he is both small and not wet, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not impartial or not naughty, then Philbert is not small.
As long as someone is not small, he is impartial and not healthy.
It can be concluded that Carroll is impartial once knowing that Bruce is not naughty.
Philbert being not naughty is equivalent to Kimberly being impartial.
If there is someone who is both impartial and wet, then Kimberly is not naughty.
If Kimberly is wet, then Quillan is healthy and Philbert is not impartial, and vice versa.
Someone who is impartial is always both not small and not healthy.
Philbert is wet if and only if Kimberly is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is not naughty, then Quillan is not wet and Thomas is not small.
Someone being both not small and naughty is equivalent to being not wet.
If someone is naughty or he is not small, then he is not solid. | Kimberly is not solid. | neutral |
Kimberly is not impartial.
Bryant is not impartial.
Bruce is not impartial.
Bryant is healthy.
Thomas is small.
Philbert is small.
Carroll is naughty.
Bruce is not naughty.
Kimberly is not naughty.
Quillan is not naughty.
Thomas is not impartial.
Bryant is not small.If someone is naughty and not impartial, then he is both small and not wet, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not impartial or not naughty, then Philbert is not small.
As long as someone is not small, he is impartial and not healthy.
It can be concluded that Carroll is impartial once knowing that Bruce is not naughty.
Philbert being not naughty is equivalent to Kimberly being impartial.
If there is someone who is both impartial and wet, then Kimberly is not naughty.
If Kimberly is wet, then Quillan is healthy and Philbert is not impartial, and vice versa.
Someone who is impartial is always both not small and not healthy.
Philbert is wet if and only if Kimberly is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is not naughty, then Quillan is not wet and Thomas is not small.
Someone being both not small and naughty is equivalent to being not wet.
If someone is naughty or he is not small, then he is not solid. | Kimberly is not naughty. | entailment |
Kimberly is not impartial.
Bryant is not impartial.
Bruce is not impartial.
Bryant is healthy.
Thomas is small.
Philbert is small.
Carroll is naughty.
Bruce is not naughty.
Kimberly is not naughty.
Quillan is not naughty.
Thomas is not impartial.
Bryant is not small.If someone is naughty and not impartial, then he is both small and not wet, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not impartial or not naughty, then Philbert is not small.
As long as someone is not small, he is impartial and not healthy.
It can be concluded that Carroll is impartial once knowing that Bruce is not naughty.
Philbert being not naughty is equivalent to Kimberly being impartial.
If there is someone who is both impartial and wet, then Kimberly is not naughty.
If Kimberly is wet, then Quillan is healthy and Philbert is not impartial, and vice versa.
Someone who is impartial is always both not small and not healthy.
Philbert is wet if and only if Kimberly is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is not naughty, then Quillan is not wet and Thomas is not small.
Someone being both not small and naughty is equivalent to being not wet.
If someone is naughty or he is not small, then he is not solid. | Carroll is not small. | entailment |
Kimberly is not impartial.
Bryant is not impartial.
Bruce is not impartial.
Bryant is healthy.
Thomas is small.
Philbert is small.
Carroll is naughty.
Bruce is not naughty.
Kimberly is not naughty.
Quillan is not naughty.
Thomas is not impartial.
Bryant is not small.If someone is naughty and not impartial, then he is both small and not wet, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not impartial or not naughty, then Philbert is not small.
As long as someone is not small, he is impartial and not healthy.
It can be concluded that Carroll is impartial once knowing that Bruce is not naughty.
Philbert being not naughty is equivalent to Kimberly being impartial.
If there is someone who is both impartial and wet, then Kimberly is not naughty.
If Kimberly is wet, then Quillan is healthy and Philbert is not impartial, and vice versa.
Someone who is impartial is always both not small and not healthy.
Philbert is wet if and only if Kimberly is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is not naughty, then Quillan is not wet and Thomas is not small.
Someone being both not small and naughty is equivalent to being not wet.
If someone is naughty or he is not small, then he is not solid. | Quillan is not naughty. | self_contradiction |
Kimberly is not impartial.
Bryant is not impartial.
Bruce is not impartial.
Bryant is healthy.
Thomas is small.
Philbert is small.
Carroll is naughty.
Bruce is not naughty.
Kimberly is not naughty.
Quillan is not naughty.
Thomas is not impartial.
Bryant is not small.If someone is naughty and not impartial, then he is both small and not wet, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not impartial or not naughty, then Philbert is not small.
As long as someone is not small, he is impartial and not healthy.
It can be concluded that Carroll is impartial once knowing that Bruce is not naughty.
Philbert being not naughty is equivalent to Kimberly being impartial.
If there is someone who is both impartial and wet, then Kimberly is not naughty.
If Kimberly is wet, then Quillan is healthy and Philbert is not impartial, and vice versa.
Someone who is impartial is always both not small and not healthy.
Philbert is wet if and only if Kimberly is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is not naughty, then Quillan is not wet and Thomas is not small.
Someone being both not small and naughty is equivalent to being not wet.
If someone is naughty or he is not small, then he is not solid. | Bruce is not healthy. | neutral |
Kimberly is not impartial.
Bryant is not impartial.
Bruce is not impartial.
Bryant is healthy.
Thomas is small.
Philbert is small.
Carroll is naughty.
Bruce is not naughty.
Kimberly is not naughty.
Quillan is not naughty.
Thomas is not impartial.
Bryant is not small.If someone is naughty and not impartial, then he is both small and not wet, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not impartial or not naughty, then Philbert is not small.
As long as someone is not small, he is impartial and not healthy.
It can be concluded that Carroll is impartial once knowing that Bruce is not naughty.
Philbert being not naughty is equivalent to Kimberly being impartial.
If there is someone who is both impartial and wet, then Kimberly is not naughty.
If Kimberly is wet, then Quillan is healthy and Philbert is not impartial, and vice versa.
Someone who is impartial is always both not small and not healthy.
Philbert is wet if and only if Kimberly is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is not naughty, then Quillan is not wet and Thomas is not small.
Someone being both not small and naughty is equivalent to being not wet.
If someone is naughty or he is not small, then he is not solid. | Quillan is not small. | entailment |
Kimberly is not impartial.
Bryant is not impartial.
Bruce is not impartial.
Bryant is healthy.
Thomas is small.
Philbert is small.
Carroll is naughty.
Bruce is not naughty.
Kimberly is not naughty.
Quillan is not naughty.
Thomas is not impartial.
Bryant is not small.If someone is naughty and not impartial, then he is both small and not wet, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not impartial or not naughty, then Philbert is not small.
As long as someone is not small, he is impartial and not healthy.
It can be concluded that Carroll is impartial once knowing that Bruce is not naughty.
Philbert being not naughty is equivalent to Kimberly being impartial.
If there is someone who is both impartial and wet, then Kimberly is not naughty.
If Kimberly is wet, then Quillan is healthy and Philbert is not impartial, and vice versa.
Someone who is impartial is always both not small and not healthy.
Philbert is wet if and only if Kimberly is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is not naughty, then Quillan is not wet and Thomas is not small.
Someone being both not small and naughty is equivalent to being not wet.
If someone is naughty or he is not small, then he is not solid. | Quillan is naughty. | self_contradiction |
Kimberly is not impartial.
Bryant is not impartial.
Bruce is not impartial.
Bryant is healthy.
Thomas is small.
Philbert is small.
Carroll is naughty.
Bruce is not naughty.
Kimberly is not naughty.
Quillan is not naughty.
Thomas is not impartial.
Bryant is not small.If someone is naughty and not impartial, then he is both small and not wet, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not impartial or not naughty, then Philbert is not small.
As long as someone is not small, he is impartial and not healthy.
It can be concluded that Carroll is impartial once knowing that Bruce is not naughty.
Philbert being not naughty is equivalent to Kimberly being impartial.
If there is someone who is both impartial and wet, then Kimberly is not naughty.
If Kimberly is wet, then Quillan is healthy and Philbert is not impartial, and vice versa.
Someone who is impartial is always both not small and not healthy.
Philbert is wet if and only if Kimberly is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is not naughty, then Quillan is not wet and Thomas is not small.
Someone being both not small and naughty is equivalent to being not wet.
If someone is naughty or he is not small, then he is not solid. | Philbert is wet. | entailment |
Kimberly is not impartial.
Bryant is not impartial.
Bruce is not impartial.
Bryant is healthy.
Thomas is small.
Philbert is small.
Carroll is naughty.
Bruce is not naughty.
Kimberly is not naughty.
Quillan is not naughty.
Thomas is not impartial.
Bryant is not small.If someone is naughty and not impartial, then he is both small and not wet, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not impartial or not naughty, then Philbert is not small.
As long as someone is not small, he is impartial and not healthy.
It can be concluded that Carroll is impartial once knowing that Bruce is not naughty.
Philbert being not naughty is equivalent to Kimberly being impartial.
If there is someone who is both impartial and wet, then Kimberly is not naughty.
If Kimberly is wet, then Quillan is healthy and Philbert is not impartial, and vice versa.
Someone who is impartial is always both not small and not healthy.
Philbert is wet if and only if Kimberly is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is not naughty, then Quillan is not wet and Thomas is not small.
Someone being both not small and naughty is equivalent to being not wet.
If someone is naughty or he is not small, then he is not solid. | Quillan is not healthy. | entailment |
Kimberly is not impartial.
Bryant is not impartial.
Bruce is not impartial.
Bryant is healthy.
Thomas is small.
Philbert is small.
Carroll is naughty.
Bruce is not naughty.
Kimberly is not naughty.
Quillan is not naughty.
Thomas is not impartial.
Bryant is not small.If someone is naughty and not impartial, then he is both small and not wet, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not impartial or not naughty, then Philbert is not small.
As long as someone is not small, he is impartial and not healthy.
It can be concluded that Carroll is impartial once knowing that Bruce is not naughty.
Philbert being not naughty is equivalent to Kimberly being impartial.
If there is someone who is both impartial and wet, then Kimberly is not naughty.
If Kimberly is wet, then Quillan is healthy and Philbert is not impartial, and vice versa.
Someone who is impartial is always both not small and not healthy.
Philbert is wet if and only if Kimberly is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is not naughty, then Quillan is not wet and Thomas is not small.
Someone being both not small and naughty is equivalent to being not wet.
If someone is naughty or he is not small, then he is not solid. | Philbert is naughty. | neutral |
Kimberly is not impartial.
Bryant is not impartial.
Bruce is not impartial.
Bryant is healthy.
Thomas is small.
Philbert is small.
Carroll is naughty.
Bruce is not naughty.
Kimberly is not naughty.
Quillan is not naughty.
Thomas is not impartial.
Bryant is not small.If someone is naughty and not impartial, then he is both small and not wet, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not impartial or not naughty, then Philbert is not small.
As long as someone is not small, he is impartial and not healthy.
It can be concluded that Carroll is impartial once knowing that Bruce is not naughty.
Philbert being not naughty is equivalent to Kimberly being impartial.
If there is someone who is both impartial and wet, then Kimberly is not naughty.
If Kimberly is wet, then Quillan is healthy and Philbert is not impartial, and vice versa.
Someone who is impartial is always both not small and not healthy.
Philbert is wet if and only if Kimberly is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is not naughty, then Quillan is not wet and Thomas is not small.
Someone being both not small and naughty is equivalent to being not wet.
If someone is naughty or he is not small, then he is not solid. | Thomas is impartial. | self_contradiction |
Kimberly is not impartial.
Bryant is not impartial.
Bruce is not impartial.
Bryant is healthy.
Thomas is small.
Philbert is small.
Carroll is naughty.
Bruce is not naughty.
Kimberly is not naughty.
Quillan is not naughty.
Thomas is not impartial.
Bryant is not small.If someone is naughty and not impartial, then he is both small and not wet, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not impartial or not naughty, then Philbert is not small.
As long as someone is not small, he is impartial and not healthy.
It can be concluded that Carroll is impartial once knowing that Bruce is not naughty.
Philbert being not naughty is equivalent to Kimberly being impartial.
If there is someone who is both impartial and wet, then Kimberly is not naughty.
If Kimberly is wet, then Quillan is healthy and Philbert is not impartial, and vice versa.
Someone who is impartial is always both not small and not healthy.
Philbert is wet if and only if Kimberly is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is not naughty, then Quillan is not wet and Thomas is not small.
Someone being both not small and naughty is equivalent to being not wet.
If someone is naughty or he is not small, then he is not solid. | Bruce is impartial. | contradiction |
Kimberly is not impartial.
Bryant is not impartial.
Bruce is not impartial.
Bryant is healthy.
Thomas is small.
Philbert is small.
Carroll is naughty.
Bruce is not naughty.
Kimberly is not naughty.
Quillan is not naughty.
Thomas is not impartial.
Bryant is not small.If someone is naughty and not impartial, then he is both small and not wet, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not impartial or not naughty, then Philbert is not small.
As long as someone is not small, he is impartial and not healthy.
It can be concluded that Carroll is impartial once knowing that Bruce is not naughty.
Philbert being not naughty is equivalent to Kimberly being impartial.
If there is someone who is both impartial and wet, then Kimberly is not naughty.
If Kimberly is wet, then Quillan is healthy and Philbert is not impartial, and vice versa.
Someone who is impartial is always both not small and not healthy.
Philbert is wet if and only if Kimberly is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is not naughty, then Quillan is not wet and Thomas is not small.
Someone being both not small and naughty is equivalent to being not wet.
If someone is naughty or he is not small, then he is not solid. | Thomas is not impartial. | self_contradiction |
Kimberly is not impartial.
Bryant is not impartial.
Bruce is not impartial.
Bryant is healthy.
Thomas is small.
Philbert is small.
Carroll is naughty.
Bruce is not naughty.
Kimberly is not naughty.
Quillan is not naughty.
Thomas is not impartial.
Bryant is not small.If someone is naughty and not impartial, then he is both small and not wet, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not impartial or not naughty, then Philbert is not small.
As long as someone is not small, he is impartial and not healthy.
It can be concluded that Carroll is impartial once knowing that Bruce is not naughty.
Philbert being not naughty is equivalent to Kimberly being impartial.
If there is someone who is both impartial and wet, then Kimberly is not naughty.
If Kimberly is wet, then Quillan is healthy and Philbert is not impartial, and vice versa.
Someone who is impartial is always both not small and not healthy.
Philbert is wet if and only if Kimberly is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is not naughty, then Quillan is not wet and Thomas is not small.
Someone being both not small and naughty is equivalent to being not wet.
If someone is naughty or he is not small, then he is not solid. | Philbert is solid. | contradiction |
Kimberly is not impartial.
Bryant is not impartial.
Bruce is not impartial.
Bryant is healthy.
Thomas is small.
Philbert is small.
Carroll is naughty.
Bruce is not naughty.
Kimberly is not naughty.
Quillan is not naughty.
Thomas is not impartial.
Bryant is not small.If someone is naughty and not impartial, then he is both small and not wet, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not impartial or not naughty, then Philbert is not small.
As long as someone is not small, he is impartial and not healthy.
It can be concluded that Carroll is impartial once knowing that Bruce is not naughty.
Philbert being not naughty is equivalent to Kimberly being impartial.
If there is someone who is both impartial and wet, then Kimberly is not naughty.
If Kimberly is wet, then Quillan is healthy and Philbert is not impartial, and vice versa.
Someone who is impartial is always both not small and not healthy.
Philbert is wet if and only if Kimberly is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is not naughty, then Quillan is not wet and Thomas is not small.
Someone being both not small and naughty is equivalent to being not wet.
If someone is naughty or he is not small, then he is not solid. | Carroll is small. | contradiction |
Kimberly is not impartial.
Bryant is not impartial.
Bruce is not impartial.
Bryant is healthy.
Thomas is small.
Philbert is small.
Carroll is naughty.
Bruce is not naughty.
Kimberly is not naughty.
Quillan is not naughty.
Thomas is not impartial.
Bryant is not small.If someone is naughty and not impartial, then he is both small and not wet, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not impartial or not naughty, then Philbert is not small.
As long as someone is not small, he is impartial and not healthy.
It can be concluded that Carroll is impartial once knowing that Bruce is not naughty.
Philbert being not naughty is equivalent to Kimberly being impartial.
If there is someone who is both impartial and wet, then Kimberly is not naughty.
If Kimberly is wet, then Quillan is healthy and Philbert is not impartial, and vice versa.
Someone who is impartial is always both not small and not healthy.
Philbert is wet if and only if Kimberly is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is not naughty, then Quillan is not wet and Thomas is not small.
Someone being both not small and naughty is equivalent to being not wet.
If someone is naughty or he is not small, then he is not solid. | Philbert is healthy. | contradiction |
Kirk is defeated.
Igor is not defeated.
Lucia is not plain.
Albern is not selfish.
Conroy is clever.
Cadman is clever.
Amery is clever.
Albern is not plain.
Lucia is defeated.
Kirk is difficult.
Albern is not defeated.
Cadman is not selfish.If there is at least one people who is not obedient or clever, then Kirk is not difficult.
If there is someone who is not defeated, then Amery is not difficult.
Amery being not clever implies that Amery is selfish and Cadman is defeated.
It can be concluded that Kirk is selfish once knowing that Albern is not obedient or Lucia is plain.
If someone is not clever and not obedient, then he is both defeated and plain, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not selfish or not clever, then Albern is not plain.
Someone who is not clever is always both not plain and difficult.
If someone is both not defeated and selfish, then he is not difficult.
If there is at least one people who is both not obedient and not difficult, then Conroy is not selfish.
Someone is not selfish and plain if and only if he is not difficult.
If Amery is plain or Amery is not obedient, then Conroy is not defeated.
Albern is plain if and only if Kirk is difficult. | Conroy is not defeated. | entailment |
Kirk is defeated.
Igor is not defeated.
Lucia is not plain.
Albern is not selfish.
Conroy is clever.
Cadman is clever.
Amery is clever.
Albern is not plain.
Lucia is defeated.
Kirk is difficult.
Albern is not defeated.
Cadman is not selfish.If there is at least one people who is not obedient or clever, then Kirk is not difficult.
If there is someone who is not defeated, then Amery is not difficult.
Amery being not clever implies that Amery is selfish and Cadman is defeated.
It can be concluded that Kirk is selfish once knowing that Albern is not obedient or Lucia is plain.
If someone is not clever and not obedient, then he is both defeated and plain, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not selfish or not clever, then Albern is not plain.
Someone who is not clever is always both not plain and difficult.
If someone is both not defeated and selfish, then he is not difficult.
If there is at least one people who is both not obedient and not difficult, then Conroy is not selfish.
Someone is not selfish and plain if and only if he is not difficult.
If Amery is plain or Amery is not obedient, then Conroy is not defeated.
Albern is plain if and only if Kirk is difficult. | Igor is not defeated. | entailment |
Kirk is defeated.
Igor is not defeated.
Lucia is not plain.
Albern is not selfish.
Conroy is clever.
Cadman is clever.
Amery is clever.
Albern is not plain.
Lucia is defeated.
Kirk is difficult.
Albern is not defeated.
Cadman is not selfish.If there is at least one people who is not obedient or clever, then Kirk is not difficult.
If there is someone who is not defeated, then Amery is not difficult.
Amery being not clever implies that Amery is selfish and Cadman is defeated.
It can be concluded that Kirk is selfish once knowing that Albern is not obedient or Lucia is plain.
If someone is not clever and not obedient, then he is both defeated and plain, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not selfish or not clever, then Albern is not plain.
Someone who is not clever is always both not plain and difficult.
If someone is both not defeated and selfish, then he is not difficult.
If there is at least one people who is both not obedient and not difficult, then Conroy is not selfish.
Someone is not selfish and plain if and only if he is not difficult.
If Amery is plain or Amery is not obedient, then Conroy is not defeated.
Albern is plain if and only if Kirk is difficult. | Kirk is difficult. | self_contradiction |
Kirk is defeated.
Igor is not defeated.
Lucia is not plain.
Albern is not selfish.
Conroy is clever.
Cadman is clever.
Amery is clever.
Albern is not plain.
Lucia is defeated.
Kirk is difficult.
Albern is not defeated.
Cadman is not selfish.If there is at least one people who is not obedient or clever, then Kirk is not difficult.
If there is someone who is not defeated, then Amery is not difficult.
Amery being not clever implies that Amery is selfish and Cadman is defeated.
It can be concluded that Kirk is selfish once knowing that Albern is not obedient or Lucia is plain.
If someone is not clever and not obedient, then he is both defeated and plain, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not selfish or not clever, then Albern is not plain.
Someone who is not clever is always both not plain and difficult.
If someone is both not defeated and selfish, then he is not difficult.
If there is at least one people who is both not obedient and not difficult, then Conroy is not selfish.
Someone is not selfish and plain if and only if he is not difficult.
If Amery is plain or Amery is not obedient, then Conroy is not defeated.
Albern is plain if and only if Kirk is difficult. | Lucia is not plain. | entailment |
Kirk is defeated.
Igor is not defeated.
Lucia is not plain.
Albern is not selfish.
Conroy is clever.
Cadman is clever.
Amery is clever.
Albern is not plain.
Lucia is defeated.
Kirk is difficult.
Albern is not defeated.
Cadman is not selfish.If there is at least one people who is not obedient or clever, then Kirk is not difficult.
If there is someone who is not defeated, then Amery is not difficult.
Amery being not clever implies that Amery is selfish and Cadman is defeated.
It can be concluded that Kirk is selfish once knowing that Albern is not obedient or Lucia is plain.
If someone is not clever and not obedient, then he is both defeated and plain, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not selfish or not clever, then Albern is not plain.
Someone who is not clever is always both not plain and difficult.
If someone is both not defeated and selfish, then he is not difficult.
If there is at least one people who is both not obedient and not difficult, then Conroy is not selfish.
Someone is not selfish and plain if and only if he is not difficult.
If Amery is plain or Amery is not obedient, then Conroy is not defeated.
Albern is plain if and only if Kirk is difficult. | Kirk is clever. | contradiction |
Kirk is defeated.
Igor is not defeated.
Lucia is not plain.
Albern is not selfish.
Conroy is clever.
Cadman is clever.
Amery is clever.
Albern is not plain.
Lucia is defeated.
Kirk is difficult.
Albern is not defeated.
Cadman is not selfish.If there is at least one people who is not obedient or clever, then Kirk is not difficult.
If there is someone who is not defeated, then Amery is not difficult.
Amery being not clever implies that Amery is selfish and Cadman is defeated.
It can be concluded that Kirk is selfish once knowing that Albern is not obedient or Lucia is plain.
If someone is not clever and not obedient, then he is both defeated and plain, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not selfish or not clever, then Albern is not plain.
Someone who is not clever is always both not plain and difficult.
If someone is both not defeated and selfish, then he is not difficult.
If there is at least one people who is both not obedient and not difficult, then Conroy is not selfish.
Someone is not selfish and plain if and only if he is not difficult.
If Amery is plain or Amery is not obedient, then Conroy is not defeated.
Albern is plain if and only if Kirk is difficult. | Kirk is plain. | self_contradiction |
Kirk is defeated.
Igor is not defeated.
Lucia is not plain.
Albern is not selfish.
Conroy is clever.
Cadman is clever.
Amery is clever.
Albern is not plain.
Lucia is defeated.
Kirk is difficult.
Albern is not defeated.
Cadman is not selfish.If there is at least one people who is not obedient or clever, then Kirk is not difficult.
If there is someone who is not defeated, then Amery is not difficult.
Amery being not clever implies that Amery is selfish and Cadman is defeated.
It can be concluded that Kirk is selfish once knowing that Albern is not obedient or Lucia is plain.
If someone is not clever and not obedient, then he is both defeated and plain, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not selfish or not clever, then Albern is not plain.
Someone who is not clever is always both not plain and difficult.
If someone is both not defeated and selfish, then he is not difficult.
If there is at least one people who is both not obedient and not difficult, then Conroy is not selfish.
Someone is not selfish and plain if and only if he is not difficult.
If Amery is plain or Amery is not obedient, then Conroy is not defeated.
Albern is plain if and only if Kirk is difficult. | Lucia is selfish. | neutral |
Kirk is defeated.
Igor is not defeated.
Lucia is not plain.
Albern is not selfish.
Conroy is clever.
Cadman is clever.
Amery is clever.
Albern is not plain.
Lucia is defeated.
Kirk is difficult.
Albern is not defeated.
Cadman is not selfish.If there is at least one people who is not obedient or clever, then Kirk is not difficult.
If there is someone who is not defeated, then Amery is not difficult.
Amery being not clever implies that Amery is selfish and Cadman is defeated.
It can be concluded that Kirk is selfish once knowing that Albern is not obedient or Lucia is plain.
If someone is not clever and not obedient, then he is both defeated and plain, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not selfish or not clever, then Albern is not plain.
Someone who is not clever is always both not plain and difficult.
If someone is both not defeated and selfish, then he is not difficult.
If there is at least one people who is both not obedient and not difficult, then Conroy is not selfish.
Someone is not selfish and plain if and only if he is not difficult.
If Amery is plain or Amery is not obedient, then Conroy is not defeated.
Albern is plain if and only if Kirk is difficult. | Albern is not difficult. | entailment |
Kirk is defeated.
Igor is not defeated.
Lucia is not plain.
Albern is not selfish.
Conroy is clever.
Cadman is clever.
Amery is clever.
Albern is not plain.
Lucia is defeated.
Kirk is difficult.
Albern is not defeated.
Cadman is not selfish.If there is at least one people who is not obedient or clever, then Kirk is not difficult.
If there is someone who is not defeated, then Amery is not difficult.
Amery being not clever implies that Amery is selfish and Cadman is defeated.
It can be concluded that Kirk is selfish once knowing that Albern is not obedient or Lucia is plain.
If someone is not clever and not obedient, then he is both defeated and plain, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not selfish or not clever, then Albern is not plain.
Someone who is not clever is always both not plain and difficult.
If someone is both not defeated and selfish, then he is not difficult.
If there is at least one people who is both not obedient and not difficult, then Conroy is not selfish.
Someone is not selfish and plain if and only if he is not difficult.
If Amery is plain or Amery is not obedient, then Conroy is not defeated.
Albern is plain if and only if Kirk is difficult. | Conroy is clever. | entailment |
Kirk is defeated.
Igor is not defeated.
Lucia is not plain.
Albern is not selfish.
Conroy is clever.
Cadman is clever.
Amery is clever.
Albern is not plain.
Lucia is defeated.
Kirk is difficult.
Albern is not defeated.
Cadman is not selfish.If there is at least one people who is not obedient or clever, then Kirk is not difficult.
If there is someone who is not defeated, then Amery is not difficult.
Amery being not clever implies that Amery is selfish and Cadman is defeated.
It can be concluded that Kirk is selfish once knowing that Albern is not obedient or Lucia is plain.
If someone is not clever and not obedient, then he is both defeated and plain, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not selfish or not clever, then Albern is not plain.
Someone who is not clever is always both not plain and difficult.
If someone is both not defeated and selfish, then he is not difficult.
If there is at least one people who is both not obedient and not difficult, then Conroy is not selfish.
Someone is not selfish and plain if and only if he is not difficult.
If Amery is plain or Amery is not obedient, then Conroy is not defeated.
Albern is plain if and only if Kirk is difficult. | Conroy is not clever. | contradiction |
Kirk is defeated.
Igor is not defeated.
Lucia is not plain.
Albern is not selfish.
Conroy is clever.
Cadman is clever.
Amery is clever.
Albern is not plain.
Lucia is defeated.
Kirk is difficult.
Albern is not defeated.
Cadman is not selfish.If there is at least one people who is not obedient or clever, then Kirk is not difficult.
If there is someone who is not defeated, then Amery is not difficult.
Amery being not clever implies that Amery is selfish and Cadman is defeated.
It can be concluded that Kirk is selfish once knowing that Albern is not obedient or Lucia is plain.
If someone is not clever and not obedient, then he is both defeated and plain, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not selfish or not clever, then Albern is not plain.
Someone who is not clever is always both not plain and difficult.
If someone is both not defeated and selfish, then he is not difficult.
If there is at least one people who is both not obedient and not difficult, then Conroy is not selfish.
Someone is not selfish and plain if and only if he is not difficult.
If Amery is plain or Amery is not obedient, then Conroy is not defeated.
Albern is plain if and only if Kirk is difficult. | Albern is plain. | self_contradiction |
Kirk is defeated.
Igor is not defeated.
Lucia is not plain.
Albern is not selfish.
Conroy is clever.
Cadman is clever.
Amery is clever.
Albern is not plain.
Lucia is defeated.
Kirk is difficult.
Albern is not defeated.
Cadman is not selfish.If there is at least one people who is not obedient or clever, then Kirk is not difficult.
If there is someone who is not defeated, then Amery is not difficult.
Amery being not clever implies that Amery is selfish and Cadman is defeated.
It can be concluded that Kirk is selfish once knowing that Albern is not obedient or Lucia is plain.
If someone is not clever and not obedient, then he is both defeated and plain, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not selfish or not clever, then Albern is not plain.
Someone who is not clever is always both not plain and difficult.
If someone is both not defeated and selfish, then he is not difficult.
If there is at least one people who is both not obedient and not difficult, then Conroy is not selfish.
Someone is not selfish and plain if and only if he is not difficult.
If Amery is plain or Amery is not obedient, then Conroy is not defeated.
Albern is plain if and only if Kirk is difficult. | Cadman is selfish. | contradiction |
Kirk is defeated.
Igor is not defeated.
Lucia is not plain.
Albern is not selfish.
Conroy is clever.
Cadman is clever.
Amery is clever.
Albern is not plain.
Lucia is defeated.
Kirk is difficult.
Albern is not defeated.
Cadman is not selfish.If there is at least one people who is not obedient or clever, then Kirk is not difficult.
If there is someone who is not defeated, then Amery is not difficult.
Amery being not clever implies that Amery is selfish and Cadman is defeated.
It can be concluded that Kirk is selfish once knowing that Albern is not obedient or Lucia is plain.
If someone is not clever and not obedient, then he is both defeated and plain, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not selfish or not clever, then Albern is not plain.
Someone who is not clever is always both not plain and difficult.
If someone is both not defeated and selfish, then he is not difficult.
If there is at least one people who is both not obedient and not difficult, then Conroy is not selfish.
Someone is not selfish and plain if and only if he is not difficult.
If Amery is plain or Amery is not obedient, then Conroy is not defeated.
Albern is plain if and only if Kirk is difficult. | Kirk is not plain. | self_contradiction |
Kirk is defeated.
Igor is not defeated.
Lucia is not plain.
Albern is not selfish.
Conroy is clever.
Cadman is clever.
Amery is clever.
Albern is not plain.
Lucia is defeated.
Kirk is difficult.
Albern is not defeated.
Cadman is not selfish.If there is at least one people who is not obedient or clever, then Kirk is not difficult.
If there is someone who is not defeated, then Amery is not difficult.
Amery being not clever implies that Amery is selfish and Cadman is defeated.
It can be concluded that Kirk is selfish once knowing that Albern is not obedient or Lucia is plain.
If someone is not clever and not obedient, then he is both defeated and plain, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not selfish or not clever, then Albern is not plain.
Someone who is not clever is always both not plain and difficult.
If someone is both not defeated and selfish, then he is not difficult.
If there is at least one people who is both not obedient and not difficult, then Conroy is not selfish.
Someone is not selfish and plain if and only if he is not difficult.
If Amery is plain or Amery is not obedient, then Conroy is not defeated.
Albern is plain if and only if Kirk is difficult. | Cadman is defeated. | neutral |
Kirk is defeated.
Igor is not defeated.
Lucia is not plain.
Albern is not selfish.
Conroy is clever.
Cadman is clever.
Amery is clever.
Albern is not plain.
Lucia is defeated.
Kirk is difficult.
Albern is not defeated.
Cadman is not selfish.If there is at least one people who is not obedient or clever, then Kirk is not difficult.
If there is someone who is not defeated, then Amery is not difficult.
Amery being not clever implies that Amery is selfish and Cadman is defeated.
It can be concluded that Kirk is selfish once knowing that Albern is not obedient or Lucia is plain.
If someone is not clever and not obedient, then he is both defeated and plain, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not selfish or not clever, then Albern is not plain.
Someone who is not clever is always both not plain and difficult.
If someone is both not defeated and selfish, then he is not difficult.
If there is at least one people who is both not obedient and not difficult, then Conroy is not selfish.
Someone is not selfish and plain if and only if he is not difficult.
If Amery is plain or Amery is not obedient, then Conroy is not defeated.
Albern is plain if and only if Kirk is difficult. | Igor is defeated. | contradiction |
Kirk is defeated.
Igor is not defeated.
Lucia is not plain.
Albern is not selfish.
Conroy is clever.
Cadman is clever.
Amery is clever.
Albern is not plain.
Lucia is defeated.
Kirk is difficult.
Albern is not defeated.
Cadman is not selfish.If there is at least one people who is not obedient or clever, then Kirk is not difficult.
If there is someone who is not defeated, then Amery is not difficult.
Amery being not clever implies that Amery is selfish and Cadman is defeated.
It can be concluded that Kirk is selfish once knowing that Albern is not obedient or Lucia is plain.
If someone is not clever and not obedient, then he is both defeated and plain, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not selfish or not clever, then Albern is not plain.
Someone who is not clever is always both not plain and difficult.
If someone is both not defeated and selfish, then he is not difficult.
If there is at least one people who is both not obedient and not difficult, then Conroy is not selfish.
Someone is not selfish and plain if and only if he is not difficult.
If Amery is plain or Amery is not obedient, then Conroy is not defeated.
Albern is plain if and only if Kirk is difficult. | Kirk is not difficult. | self_contradiction |
Kirk is defeated.
Igor is not defeated.
Lucia is not plain.
Albern is not selfish.
Conroy is clever.
Cadman is clever.
Amery is clever.
Albern is not plain.
Lucia is defeated.
Kirk is difficult.
Albern is not defeated.
Cadman is not selfish.If there is at least one people who is not obedient or clever, then Kirk is not difficult.
If there is someone who is not defeated, then Amery is not difficult.
Amery being not clever implies that Amery is selfish and Cadman is defeated.
It can be concluded that Kirk is selfish once knowing that Albern is not obedient or Lucia is plain.
If someone is not clever and not obedient, then he is both defeated and plain, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not selfish or not clever, then Albern is not plain.
Someone who is not clever is always both not plain and difficult.
If someone is both not defeated and selfish, then he is not difficult.
If there is at least one people who is both not obedient and not difficult, then Conroy is not selfish.
Someone is not selfish and plain if and only if he is not difficult.
If Amery is plain or Amery is not obedient, then Conroy is not defeated.
Albern is plain if and only if Kirk is difficult. | Albern is obedient. | neutral |
Kirk is defeated.
Igor is not defeated.
Lucia is not plain.
Albern is not selfish.
Conroy is clever.
Cadman is clever.
Amery is clever.
Albern is not plain.
Lucia is defeated.
Kirk is difficult.
Albern is not defeated.
Cadman is not selfish.If there is at least one people who is not obedient or clever, then Kirk is not difficult.
If there is someone who is not defeated, then Amery is not difficult.
Amery being not clever implies that Amery is selfish and Cadman is defeated.
It can be concluded that Kirk is selfish once knowing that Albern is not obedient or Lucia is plain.
If someone is not clever and not obedient, then he is both defeated and plain, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not selfish or not clever, then Albern is not plain.
Someone who is not clever is always both not plain and difficult.
If someone is both not defeated and selfish, then he is not difficult.
If there is at least one people who is both not obedient and not difficult, then Conroy is not selfish.
Someone is not selfish and plain if and only if he is not difficult.
If Amery is plain or Amery is not obedient, then Conroy is not defeated.
Albern is plain if and only if Kirk is difficult. | Lucia is clever. | neutral |
Kirk is defeated.
Igor is not defeated.
Lucia is not plain.
Albern is not selfish.
Conroy is clever.
Cadman is clever.
Amery is clever.
Albern is not plain.
Lucia is defeated.
Kirk is difficult.
Albern is not defeated.
Cadman is not selfish.If there is at least one people who is not obedient or clever, then Kirk is not difficult.
If there is someone who is not defeated, then Amery is not difficult.
Amery being not clever implies that Amery is selfish and Cadman is defeated.
It can be concluded that Kirk is selfish once knowing that Albern is not obedient or Lucia is plain.
If someone is not clever and not obedient, then he is both defeated and plain, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not selfish or not clever, then Albern is not plain.
Someone who is not clever is always both not plain and difficult.
If someone is both not defeated and selfish, then he is not difficult.
If there is at least one people who is both not obedient and not difficult, then Conroy is not selfish.
Someone is not selfish and plain if and only if he is not difficult.
If Amery is plain or Amery is not obedient, then Conroy is not defeated.
Albern is plain if and only if Kirk is difficult. | Lucia is not defeated. | contradiction |
Kirk is defeated.
Igor is not defeated.
Lucia is not plain.
Albern is not selfish.
Conroy is clever.
Cadman is clever.
Amery is clever.
Albern is not plain.
Lucia is defeated.
Kirk is difficult.
Albern is not defeated.
Cadman is not selfish.If there is at least one people who is not obedient or clever, then Kirk is not difficult.
If there is someone who is not defeated, then Amery is not difficult.
Amery being not clever implies that Amery is selfish and Cadman is defeated.
It can be concluded that Kirk is selfish once knowing that Albern is not obedient or Lucia is plain.
If someone is not clever and not obedient, then he is both defeated and plain, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not selfish or not clever, then Albern is not plain.
Someone who is not clever is always both not plain and difficult.
If someone is both not defeated and selfish, then he is not difficult.
If there is at least one people who is both not obedient and not difficult, then Conroy is not selfish.
Someone is not selfish and plain if and only if he is not difficult.
If Amery is plain or Amery is not obedient, then Conroy is not defeated.
Albern is plain if and only if Kirk is difficult. | Lucia is obedient. | neutral |
Collier is not puzzled.
Tommy is not sore.
Carlton is unusual.
Cadman is not sore.
Bowen is not puzzled.
Bowen is sore.
Tommy is impressive.
Bowen is not impressive.
Jeremiah is puzzled.
Carter is not impressive.
Jeremiah is not impressive.
Collier is not sufficient.If there is someone who is either not puzzled or not unusual, then Jeremiah is impressive.
Someone who is not puzzled is always both impressive and sore.
If there is at least one people who is impressive or unusual, then Carter is practical.
Bowen being sufficient and Cadman being puzzled imply that Bowen is practical.
Collier being not practical is equivalent to Carter being not puzzled.
All impressive people are unusual.
It can be concluded that Bowen is unusual once knowing that Cadman is practical.
If there is someone who is both puzzled and not impressive, then Jeremiah is not practical.
If there is at least one people who is puzzled or sore, then Tommy is unusual.
Jeremiah is not sore if and only if Jeremiah is practical.
If someone who is sufficient is also not sore, then he is not unusual.
Someone who is practical is always both not unusual and impressive. | Carter is practical. | entailment |
Collier is not puzzled.
Tommy is not sore.
Carlton is unusual.
Cadman is not sore.
Bowen is not puzzled.
Bowen is sore.
Tommy is impressive.
Bowen is not impressive.
Jeremiah is puzzled.
Carter is not impressive.
Jeremiah is not impressive.
Collier is not sufficient.If there is someone who is either not puzzled or not unusual, then Jeremiah is impressive.
Someone who is not puzzled is always both impressive and sore.
If there is at least one people who is impressive or unusual, then Carter is practical.
Bowen being sufficient and Cadman being puzzled imply that Bowen is practical.
Collier being not practical is equivalent to Carter being not puzzled.
All impressive people are unusual.
It can be concluded that Bowen is unusual once knowing that Cadman is practical.
If there is someone who is both puzzled and not impressive, then Jeremiah is not practical.
If there is at least one people who is puzzled or sore, then Tommy is unusual.
Jeremiah is not sore if and only if Jeremiah is practical.
If someone who is sufficient is also not sore, then he is not unusual.
Someone who is practical is always both not unusual and impressive. | Carter is not impressive. | self_contradiction |
Collier is not puzzled.
Tommy is not sore.
Carlton is unusual.
Cadman is not sore.
Bowen is not puzzled.
Bowen is sore.
Tommy is impressive.
Bowen is not impressive.
Jeremiah is puzzled.
Carter is not impressive.
Jeremiah is not impressive.
Collier is not sufficient.If there is someone who is either not puzzled or not unusual, then Jeremiah is impressive.
Someone who is not puzzled is always both impressive and sore.
If there is at least one people who is impressive or unusual, then Carter is practical.
Bowen being sufficient and Cadman being puzzled imply that Bowen is practical.
Collier being not practical is equivalent to Carter being not puzzled.
All impressive people are unusual.
It can be concluded that Bowen is unusual once knowing that Cadman is practical.
If there is someone who is both puzzled and not impressive, then Jeremiah is not practical.
If there is at least one people who is puzzled or sore, then Tommy is unusual.
Jeremiah is not sore if and only if Jeremiah is practical.
If someone who is sufficient is also not sore, then he is not unusual.
Someone who is practical is always both not unusual and impressive. | Bowen is not puzzled. | entailment |
Collier is not puzzled.
Tommy is not sore.
Carlton is unusual.
Cadman is not sore.
Bowen is not puzzled.
Bowen is sore.
Tommy is impressive.
Bowen is not impressive.
Jeremiah is puzzled.
Carter is not impressive.
Jeremiah is not impressive.
Collier is not sufficient.If there is someone who is either not puzzled or not unusual, then Jeremiah is impressive.
Someone who is not puzzled is always both impressive and sore.
If there is at least one people who is impressive or unusual, then Carter is practical.
Bowen being sufficient and Cadman being puzzled imply that Bowen is practical.
Collier being not practical is equivalent to Carter being not puzzled.
All impressive people are unusual.
It can be concluded that Bowen is unusual once knowing that Cadman is practical.
If there is someone who is both puzzled and not impressive, then Jeremiah is not practical.
If there is at least one people who is puzzled or sore, then Tommy is unusual.
Jeremiah is not sore if and only if Jeremiah is practical.
If someone who is sufficient is also not sore, then he is not unusual.
Someone who is practical is always both not unusual and impressive. | Bowen is puzzled. | contradiction |
Collier is not puzzled.
Tommy is not sore.
Carlton is unusual.
Cadman is not sore.
Bowen is not puzzled.
Bowen is sore.
Tommy is impressive.
Bowen is not impressive.
Jeremiah is puzzled.
Carter is not impressive.
Jeremiah is not impressive.
Collier is not sufficient.If there is someone who is either not puzzled or not unusual, then Jeremiah is impressive.
Someone who is not puzzled is always both impressive and sore.
If there is at least one people who is impressive or unusual, then Carter is practical.
Bowen being sufficient and Cadman being puzzled imply that Bowen is practical.
Collier being not practical is equivalent to Carter being not puzzled.
All impressive people are unusual.
It can be concluded that Bowen is unusual once knowing that Cadman is practical.
If there is someone who is both puzzled and not impressive, then Jeremiah is not practical.
If there is at least one people who is puzzled or sore, then Tommy is unusual.
Jeremiah is not sore if and only if Jeremiah is practical.
If someone who is sufficient is also not sore, then he is not unusual.
Someone who is practical is always both not unusual and impressive. | Collier is impressive. | entailment |
Collier is not puzzled.
Tommy is not sore.
Carlton is unusual.
Cadman is not sore.
Bowen is not puzzled.
Bowen is sore.
Tommy is impressive.
Bowen is not impressive.
Jeremiah is puzzled.
Carter is not impressive.
Jeremiah is not impressive.
Collier is not sufficient.If there is someone who is either not puzzled or not unusual, then Jeremiah is impressive.
Someone who is not puzzled is always both impressive and sore.
If there is at least one people who is impressive or unusual, then Carter is practical.
Bowen being sufficient and Cadman being puzzled imply that Bowen is practical.
Collier being not practical is equivalent to Carter being not puzzled.
All impressive people are unusual.
It can be concluded that Bowen is unusual once knowing that Cadman is practical.
If there is someone who is both puzzled and not impressive, then Jeremiah is not practical.
If there is at least one people who is puzzled or sore, then Tommy is unusual.
Jeremiah is not sore if and only if Jeremiah is practical.
If someone who is sufficient is also not sore, then he is not unusual.
Someone who is practical is always both not unusual and impressive. | Collier is not sore. | contradiction |
Collier is not puzzled.
Tommy is not sore.
Carlton is unusual.
Cadman is not sore.
Bowen is not puzzled.
Bowen is sore.
Tommy is impressive.
Bowen is not impressive.
Jeremiah is puzzled.
Carter is not impressive.
Jeremiah is not impressive.
Collier is not sufficient.If there is someone who is either not puzzled or not unusual, then Jeremiah is impressive.
Someone who is not puzzled is always both impressive and sore.
If there is at least one people who is impressive or unusual, then Carter is practical.
Bowen being sufficient and Cadman being puzzled imply that Bowen is practical.
Collier being not practical is equivalent to Carter being not puzzled.
All impressive people are unusual.
It can be concluded that Bowen is unusual once knowing that Cadman is practical.
If there is someone who is both puzzled and not impressive, then Jeremiah is not practical.
If there is at least one people who is puzzled or sore, then Tommy is unusual.
Jeremiah is not sore if and only if Jeremiah is practical.
If someone who is sufficient is also not sore, then he is not unusual.
Someone who is practical is always both not unusual and impressive. | Bowen is unusual. | entailment |
Collier is not puzzled.
Tommy is not sore.
Carlton is unusual.
Cadman is not sore.
Bowen is not puzzled.
Bowen is sore.
Tommy is impressive.
Bowen is not impressive.
Jeremiah is puzzled.
Carter is not impressive.
Jeremiah is not impressive.
Collier is not sufficient.If there is someone who is either not puzzled or not unusual, then Jeremiah is impressive.
Someone who is not puzzled is always both impressive and sore.
If there is at least one people who is impressive or unusual, then Carter is practical.
Bowen being sufficient and Cadman being puzzled imply that Bowen is practical.
Collier being not practical is equivalent to Carter being not puzzled.
All impressive people are unusual.
It can be concluded that Bowen is unusual once knowing that Cadman is practical.
If there is someone who is both puzzled and not impressive, then Jeremiah is not practical.
If there is at least one people who is puzzled or sore, then Tommy is unusual.
Jeremiah is not sore if and only if Jeremiah is practical.
If someone who is sufficient is also not sore, then he is not unusual.
Someone who is practical is always both not unusual and impressive. | Collier is not practical. | neutral |
Collier is not puzzled.
Tommy is not sore.
Carlton is unusual.
Cadman is not sore.
Bowen is not puzzled.
Bowen is sore.
Tommy is impressive.
Bowen is not impressive.
Jeremiah is puzzled.
Carter is not impressive.
Jeremiah is not impressive.
Collier is not sufficient.If there is someone who is either not puzzled or not unusual, then Jeremiah is impressive.
Someone who is not puzzled is always both impressive and sore.
If there is at least one people who is impressive or unusual, then Carter is practical.
Bowen being sufficient and Cadman being puzzled imply that Bowen is practical.
Collier being not practical is equivalent to Carter being not puzzled.
All impressive people are unusual.
It can be concluded that Bowen is unusual once knowing that Cadman is practical.
If there is someone who is both puzzled and not impressive, then Jeremiah is not practical.
If there is at least one people who is puzzled or sore, then Tommy is unusual.
Jeremiah is not sore if and only if Jeremiah is practical.
If someone who is sufficient is also not sore, then he is not unusual.
Someone who is practical is always both not unusual and impressive. | Bowen is not impressive. | self_contradiction |
Collier is not puzzled.
Tommy is not sore.
Carlton is unusual.
Cadman is not sore.
Bowen is not puzzled.
Bowen is sore.
Tommy is impressive.
Bowen is not impressive.
Jeremiah is puzzled.
Carter is not impressive.
Jeremiah is not impressive.
Collier is not sufficient.If there is someone who is either not puzzled or not unusual, then Jeremiah is impressive.
Someone who is not puzzled is always both impressive and sore.
If there is at least one people who is impressive or unusual, then Carter is practical.
Bowen being sufficient and Cadman being puzzled imply that Bowen is practical.
Collier being not practical is equivalent to Carter being not puzzled.
All impressive people are unusual.
It can be concluded that Bowen is unusual once knowing that Cadman is practical.
If there is someone who is both puzzled and not impressive, then Jeremiah is not practical.
If there is at least one people who is puzzled or sore, then Tommy is unusual.
Jeremiah is not sore if and only if Jeremiah is practical.
If someone who is sufficient is also not sore, then he is not unusual.
Someone who is practical is always both not unusual and impressive. | Carter is unusual. | self_contradiction |
Collier is not puzzled.
Tommy is not sore.
Carlton is unusual.
Cadman is not sore.
Bowen is not puzzled.
Bowen is sore.
Tommy is impressive.
Bowen is not impressive.
Jeremiah is puzzled.
Carter is not impressive.
Jeremiah is not impressive.
Collier is not sufficient.If there is someone who is either not puzzled or not unusual, then Jeremiah is impressive.
Someone who is not puzzled is always both impressive and sore.
If there is at least one people who is impressive or unusual, then Carter is practical.
Bowen being sufficient and Cadman being puzzled imply that Bowen is practical.
Collier being not practical is equivalent to Carter being not puzzled.
All impressive people are unusual.
It can be concluded that Bowen is unusual once knowing that Cadman is practical.
If there is someone who is both puzzled and not impressive, then Jeremiah is not practical.
If there is at least one people who is puzzled or sore, then Tommy is unusual.
Jeremiah is not sore if and only if Jeremiah is practical.
If someone who is sufficient is also not sore, then he is not unusual.
Someone who is practical is always both not unusual and impressive. | Collier is not impressive. | contradiction |
Collier is not puzzled.
Tommy is not sore.
Carlton is unusual.
Cadman is not sore.
Bowen is not puzzled.
Bowen is sore.
Tommy is impressive.
Bowen is not impressive.
Jeremiah is puzzled.
Carter is not impressive.
Jeremiah is not impressive.
Collier is not sufficient.If there is someone who is either not puzzled or not unusual, then Jeremiah is impressive.
Someone who is not puzzled is always both impressive and sore.
If there is at least one people who is impressive or unusual, then Carter is practical.
Bowen being sufficient and Cadman being puzzled imply that Bowen is practical.
Collier being not practical is equivalent to Carter being not puzzled.
All impressive people are unusual.
It can be concluded that Bowen is unusual once knowing that Cadman is practical.
If there is someone who is both puzzled and not impressive, then Jeremiah is not practical.
If there is at least one people who is puzzled or sore, then Tommy is unusual.
Jeremiah is not sore if and only if Jeremiah is practical.
If someone who is sufficient is also not sore, then he is not unusual.
Someone who is practical is always both not unusual and impressive. | Carter is sore. | neutral |
Collier is not puzzled.
Tommy is not sore.
Carlton is unusual.
Cadman is not sore.
Bowen is not puzzled.
Bowen is sore.
Tommy is impressive.
Bowen is not impressive.
Jeremiah is puzzled.
Carter is not impressive.
Jeremiah is not impressive.
Collier is not sufficient.If there is someone who is either not puzzled or not unusual, then Jeremiah is impressive.
Someone who is not puzzled is always both impressive and sore.
If there is at least one people who is impressive or unusual, then Carter is practical.
Bowen being sufficient and Cadman being puzzled imply that Bowen is practical.
Collier being not practical is equivalent to Carter being not puzzled.
All impressive people are unusual.
It can be concluded that Bowen is unusual once knowing that Cadman is practical.
If there is someone who is both puzzled and not impressive, then Jeremiah is not practical.
If there is at least one people who is puzzled or sore, then Tommy is unusual.
Jeremiah is not sore if and only if Jeremiah is practical.
If someone who is sufficient is also not sore, then he is not unusual.
Someone who is practical is always both not unusual and impressive. | Bowen is impressive. | self_contradiction |
Collier is not puzzled.
Tommy is not sore.
Carlton is unusual.
Cadman is not sore.
Bowen is not puzzled.
Bowen is sore.
Tommy is impressive.
Bowen is not impressive.
Jeremiah is puzzled.
Carter is not impressive.
Jeremiah is not impressive.
Collier is not sufficient.If there is someone who is either not puzzled or not unusual, then Jeremiah is impressive.
Someone who is not puzzled is always both impressive and sore.
If there is at least one people who is impressive or unusual, then Carter is practical.
Bowen being sufficient and Cadman being puzzled imply that Bowen is practical.
Collier being not practical is equivalent to Carter being not puzzled.
All impressive people are unusual.
It can be concluded that Bowen is unusual once knowing that Cadman is practical.
If there is someone who is both puzzled and not impressive, then Jeremiah is not practical.
If there is at least one people who is puzzled or sore, then Tommy is unusual.
Jeremiah is not sore if and only if Jeremiah is practical.
If someone who is sufficient is also not sore, then he is not unusual.
Someone who is practical is always both not unusual and impressive. | Collier is sore. | entailment |
Collier is not puzzled.
Tommy is not sore.
Carlton is unusual.
Cadman is not sore.
Bowen is not puzzled.
Bowen is sore.
Tommy is impressive.
Bowen is not impressive.
Jeremiah is puzzled.
Carter is not impressive.
Jeremiah is not impressive.
Collier is not sufficient.If there is someone who is either not puzzled or not unusual, then Jeremiah is impressive.
Someone who is not puzzled is always both impressive and sore.
If there is at least one people who is impressive or unusual, then Carter is practical.
Bowen being sufficient and Cadman being puzzled imply that Bowen is practical.
Collier being not practical is equivalent to Carter being not puzzled.
All impressive people are unusual.
It can be concluded that Bowen is unusual once knowing that Cadman is practical.
If there is someone who is both puzzled and not impressive, then Jeremiah is not practical.
If there is at least one people who is puzzled or sore, then Tommy is unusual.
Jeremiah is not sore if and only if Jeremiah is practical.
If someone who is sufficient is also not sore, then he is not unusual.
Someone who is practical is always both not unusual and impressive. | Cadman is not puzzled. | neutral |
Collier is not puzzled.
Tommy is not sore.
Carlton is unusual.
Cadman is not sore.
Bowen is not puzzled.
Bowen is sore.
Tommy is impressive.
Bowen is not impressive.
Jeremiah is puzzled.
Carter is not impressive.
Jeremiah is not impressive.
Collier is not sufficient.If there is someone who is either not puzzled or not unusual, then Jeremiah is impressive.
Someone who is not puzzled is always both impressive and sore.
If there is at least one people who is impressive or unusual, then Carter is practical.
Bowen being sufficient and Cadman being puzzled imply that Bowen is practical.
Collier being not practical is equivalent to Carter being not puzzled.
All impressive people are unusual.
It can be concluded that Bowen is unusual once knowing that Cadman is practical.
If there is someone who is both puzzled and not impressive, then Jeremiah is not practical.
If there is at least one people who is puzzled or sore, then Tommy is unusual.
Jeremiah is not sore if and only if Jeremiah is practical.
If someone who is sufficient is also not sore, then he is not unusual.
Someone who is practical is always both not unusual and impressive. | Jeremiah is impressive. | self_contradiction |
Collier is not puzzled.
Tommy is not sore.
Carlton is unusual.
Cadman is not sore.
Bowen is not puzzled.
Bowen is sore.
Tommy is impressive.
Bowen is not impressive.
Jeremiah is puzzled.
Carter is not impressive.
Jeremiah is not impressive.
Collier is not sufficient.If there is someone who is either not puzzled or not unusual, then Jeremiah is impressive.
Someone who is not puzzled is always both impressive and sore.
If there is at least one people who is impressive or unusual, then Carter is practical.
Bowen being sufficient and Cadman being puzzled imply that Bowen is practical.
Collier being not practical is equivalent to Carter being not puzzled.
All impressive people are unusual.
It can be concluded that Bowen is unusual once knowing that Cadman is practical.
If there is someone who is both puzzled and not impressive, then Jeremiah is not practical.
If there is at least one people who is puzzled or sore, then Tommy is unusual.
Jeremiah is not sore if and only if Jeremiah is practical.
If someone who is sufficient is also not sore, then he is not unusual.
Someone who is practical is always both not unusual and impressive. | Carter is not practical. | contradiction |
Collier is not puzzled.
Tommy is not sore.
Carlton is unusual.
Cadman is not sore.
Bowen is not puzzled.
Bowen is sore.
Tommy is impressive.
Bowen is not impressive.
Jeremiah is puzzled.
Carter is not impressive.
Jeremiah is not impressive.
Collier is not sufficient.If there is someone who is either not puzzled or not unusual, then Jeremiah is impressive.
Someone who is not puzzled is always both impressive and sore.
If there is at least one people who is impressive or unusual, then Carter is practical.
Bowen being sufficient and Cadman being puzzled imply that Bowen is practical.
Collier being not practical is equivalent to Carter being not puzzled.
All impressive people are unusual.
It can be concluded that Bowen is unusual once knowing that Cadman is practical.
If there is someone who is both puzzled and not impressive, then Jeremiah is not practical.
If there is at least one people who is puzzled or sore, then Tommy is unusual.
Jeremiah is not sore if and only if Jeremiah is practical.
If someone who is sufficient is also not sore, then he is not unusual.
Someone who is practical is always both not unusual and impressive. | Carlton is impressive. | neutral |
Collier is not puzzled.
Tommy is not sore.
Carlton is unusual.
Cadman is not sore.
Bowen is not puzzled.
Bowen is sore.
Tommy is impressive.
Bowen is not impressive.
Jeremiah is puzzled.
Carter is not impressive.
Jeremiah is not impressive.
Collier is not sufficient.If there is someone who is either not puzzled or not unusual, then Jeremiah is impressive.
Someone who is not puzzled is always both impressive and sore.
If there is at least one people who is impressive or unusual, then Carter is practical.
Bowen being sufficient and Cadman being puzzled imply that Bowen is practical.
Collier being not practical is equivalent to Carter being not puzzled.
All impressive people are unusual.
It can be concluded that Bowen is unusual once knowing that Cadman is practical.
If there is someone who is both puzzled and not impressive, then Jeremiah is not practical.
If there is at least one people who is puzzled or sore, then Tommy is unusual.
Jeremiah is not sore if and only if Jeremiah is practical.
If someone who is sufficient is also not sore, then he is not unusual.
Someone who is practical is always both not unusual and impressive. | Cadman is impressive. | neutral |
Collier is not puzzled.
Tommy is not sore.
Carlton is unusual.
Cadman is not sore.
Bowen is not puzzled.
Bowen is sore.
Tommy is impressive.
Bowen is not impressive.
Jeremiah is puzzled.
Carter is not impressive.
Jeremiah is not impressive.
Collier is not sufficient.If there is someone who is either not puzzled or not unusual, then Jeremiah is impressive.
Someone who is not puzzled is always both impressive and sore.
If there is at least one people who is impressive or unusual, then Carter is practical.
Bowen being sufficient and Cadman being puzzled imply that Bowen is practical.
Collier being not practical is equivalent to Carter being not puzzled.
All impressive people are unusual.
It can be concluded that Bowen is unusual once knowing that Cadman is practical.
If there is someone who is both puzzled and not impressive, then Jeremiah is not practical.
If there is at least one people who is puzzled or sore, then Tommy is unusual.
Jeremiah is not sore if and only if Jeremiah is practical.
If someone who is sufficient is also not sore, then he is not unusual.
Someone who is practical is always both not unusual and impressive. | Carlton is not unusual. | contradiction |
Theobold is not hypocritical.
Albert is logical.
Silas is wandering.
Amanda is hypocritical.
Amanda is not wandering.
Silas is logical.
Michael is not wandering.
Kimball is not wandering.
Philbert is charming.
Michael is not charming.
Theobold is not charming.
Theobold is wandering.If Theobold is not logical and Silas is not acceptable, then Philbert is charming.
If there is someone who is either not big or not charming, then Michael is not wandering.
Silas being wandering and Philbert being not hypocritical imply that Amanda is logical.
It can be concluded that Philbert is not logical once knowing that Kimball is big or Silas is not hypocritical.
If there is at least one people who is acceptable, then Michael is not logical.
If someone is not charming, then he is wandering, and vice versa.
If someone is not acceptable, then he is not wandering, and vice versa.
Someone being big is equivalent to being not hypocritical.
If someone is charming and not hypocritical, then he is both big and logical, and vice versa.
If someone is charming or he is not hypocritical, then he is not big.
Philbert is not charming if and only if Amanda is not acceptable.
Someone being both hypocritical and logical is equivalent to being charming. | Philbert is big. | contradiction |
Theobold is not hypocritical.
Albert is logical.
Silas is wandering.
Amanda is hypocritical.
Amanda is not wandering.
Silas is logical.
Michael is not wandering.
Kimball is not wandering.
Philbert is charming.
Michael is not charming.
Theobold is not charming.
Theobold is wandering.If Theobold is not logical and Silas is not acceptable, then Philbert is charming.
If there is someone who is either not big or not charming, then Michael is not wandering.
Silas being wandering and Philbert being not hypocritical imply that Amanda is logical.
It can be concluded that Philbert is not logical once knowing that Kimball is big or Silas is not hypocritical.
If there is at least one people who is acceptable, then Michael is not logical.
If someone is not charming, then he is wandering, and vice versa.
If someone is not acceptable, then he is not wandering, and vice versa.
Someone being big is equivalent to being not hypocritical.
If someone is charming and not hypocritical, then he is both big and logical, and vice versa.
If someone is charming or he is not hypocritical, then he is not big.
Philbert is not charming if and only if Amanda is not acceptable.
Someone being both hypocritical and logical is equivalent to being charming. | Albert is not logical. | contradiction |
Theobold is not hypocritical.
Albert is logical.
Silas is wandering.
Amanda is hypocritical.
Amanda is not wandering.
Silas is logical.
Michael is not wandering.
Kimball is not wandering.
Philbert is charming.
Michael is not charming.
Theobold is not charming.
Theobold is wandering.If Theobold is not logical and Silas is not acceptable, then Philbert is charming.
If there is someone who is either not big or not charming, then Michael is not wandering.
Silas being wandering and Philbert being not hypocritical imply that Amanda is logical.
It can be concluded that Philbert is not logical once knowing that Kimball is big or Silas is not hypocritical.
If there is at least one people who is acceptable, then Michael is not logical.
If someone is not charming, then he is wandering, and vice versa.
If someone is not acceptable, then he is not wandering, and vice versa.
Someone being big is equivalent to being not hypocritical.
If someone is charming and not hypocritical, then he is both big and logical, and vice versa.
If someone is charming or he is not hypocritical, then he is not big.
Philbert is not charming if and only if Amanda is not acceptable.
Someone being both hypocritical and logical is equivalent to being charming. | Philbert is not charming. | self_contradiction |
Theobold is not hypocritical.
Albert is logical.
Silas is wandering.
Amanda is hypocritical.
Amanda is not wandering.
Silas is logical.
Michael is not wandering.
Kimball is not wandering.
Philbert is charming.
Michael is not charming.
Theobold is not charming.
Theobold is wandering.If Theobold is not logical and Silas is not acceptable, then Philbert is charming.
If there is someone who is either not big or not charming, then Michael is not wandering.
Silas being wandering and Philbert being not hypocritical imply that Amanda is logical.
It can be concluded that Philbert is not logical once knowing that Kimball is big or Silas is not hypocritical.
If there is at least one people who is acceptable, then Michael is not logical.
If someone is not charming, then he is wandering, and vice versa.
If someone is not acceptable, then he is not wandering, and vice versa.
Someone being big is equivalent to being not hypocritical.
If someone is charming and not hypocritical, then he is both big and logical, and vice versa.
If someone is charming or he is not hypocritical, then he is not big.
Philbert is not charming if and only if Amanda is not acceptable.
Someone being both hypocritical and logical is equivalent to being charming. | Philbert is not wandering. | contradiction |
Theobold is not hypocritical.
Albert is logical.
Silas is wandering.
Amanda is hypocritical.
Amanda is not wandering.
Silas is logical.
Michael is not wandering.
Kimball is not wandering.
Philbert is charming.
Michael is not charming.
Theobold is not charming.
Theobold is wandering.If Theobold is not logical and Silas is not acceptable, then Philbert is charming.
If there is someone who is either not big or not charming, then Michael is not wandering.
Silas being wandering and Philbert being not hypocritical imply that Amanda is logical.
It can be concluded that Philbert is not logical once knowing that Kimball is big or Silas is not hypocritical.
If there is at least one people who is acceptable, then Michael is not logical.
If someone is not charming, then he is wandering, and vice versa.
If someone is not acceptable, then he is not wandering, and vice versa.
Someone being big is equivalent to being not hypocritical.
If someone is charming and not hypocritical, then he is both big and logical, and vice versa.
If someone is charming or he is not hypocritical, then he is not big.
Philbert is not charming if and only if Amanda is not acceptable.
Someone being both hypocritical and logical is equivalent to being charming. | Michael is not logical. | neutral |
Theobold is not hypocritical.
Albert is logical.
Silas is wandering.
Amanda is hypocritical.
Amanda is not wandering.
Silas is logical.
Michael is not wandering.
Kimball is not wandering.
Philbert is charming.
Michael is not charming.
Theobold is not charming.
Theobold is wandering.If Theobold is not logical and Silas is not acceptable, then Philbert is charming.
If there is someone who is either not big or not charming, then Michael is not wandering.
Silas being wandering and Philbert being not hypocritical imply that Amanda is logical.
It can be concluded that Philbert is not logical once knowing that Kimball is big or Silas is not hypocritical.
If there is at least one people who is acceptable, then Michael is not logical.
If someone is not charming, then he is wandering, and vice versa.
If someone is not acceptable, then he is not wandering, and vice versa.
Someone being big is equivalent to being not hypocritical.
If someone is charming and not hypocritical, then he is both big and logical, and vice versa.
If someone is charming or he is not hypocritical, then he is not big.
Philbert is not charming if and only if Amanda is not acceptable.
Someone being both hypocritical and logical is equivalent to being charming. | Michael is big. | neutral |
Theobold is not hypocritical.
Albert is logical.
Silas is wandering.
Amanda is hypocritical.
Amanda is not wandering.
Silas is logical.
Michael is not wandering.
Kimball is not wandering.
Philbert is charming.
Michael is not charming.
Theobold is not charming.
Theobold is wandering.If Theobold is not logical and Silas is not acceptable, then Philbert is charming.
If there is someone who is either not big or not charming, then Michael is not wandering.
Silas being wandering and Philbert being not hypocritical imply that Amanda is logical.
It can be concluded that Philbert is not logical once knowing that Kimball is big or Silas is not hypocritical.
If there is at least one people who is acceptable, then Michael is not logical.
If someone is not charming, then he is wandering, and vice versa.
If someone is not acceptable, then he is not wandering, and vice versa.
Someone being big is equivalent to being not hypocritical.
If someone is charming and not hypocritical, then he is both big and logical, and vice versa.
If someone is charming or he is not hypocritical, then he is not big.
Philbert is not charming if and only if Amanda is not acceptable.
Someone being both hypocritical and logical is equivalent to being charming. | Theobold is not big. | self_contradiction |
Theobold is not hypocritical.
Albert is logical.
Silas is wandering.
Amanda is hypocritical.
Amanda is not wandering.
Silas is logical.
Michael is not wandering.
Kimball is not wandering.
Philbert is charming.
Michael is not charming.
Theobold is not charming.
Theobold is wandering.If Theobold is not logical and Silas is not acceptable, then Philbert is charming.
If there is someone who is either not big or not charming, then Michael is not wandering.
Silas being wandering and Philbert being not hypocritical imply that Amanda is logical.
It can be concluded that Philbert is not logical once knowing that Kimball is big or Silas is not hypocritical.
If there is at least one people who is acceptable, then Michael is not logical.
If someone is not charming, then he is wandering, and vice versa.
If someone is not acceptable, then he is not wandering, and vice versa.
Someone being big is equivalent to being not hypocritical.
If someone is charming and not hypocritical, then he is both big and logical, and vice versa.
If someone is charming or he is not hypocritical, then he is not big.
Philbert is not charming if and only if Amanda is not acceptable.
Someone being both hypocritical and logical is equivalent to being charming. | Philbert is wandering. | entailment |
Theobold is not hypocritical.
Albert is logical.
Silas is wandering.
Amanda is hypocritical.
Amanda is not wandering.
Silas is logical.
Michael is not wandering.
Kimball is not wandering.
Philbert is charming.
Michael is not charming.
Theobold is not charming.
Theobold is wandering.If Theobold is not logical and Silas is not acceptable, then Philbert is charming.
If there is someone who is either not big or not charming, then Michael is not wandering.
Silas being wandering and Philbert being not hypocritical imply that Amanda is logical.
It can be concluded that Philbert is not logical once knowing that Kimball is big or Silas is not hypocritical.
If there is at least one people who is acceptable, then Michael is not logical.
If someone is not charming, then he is wandering, and vice versa.
If someone is not acceptable, then he is not wandering, and vice versa.
Someone being big is equivalent to being not hypocritical.
If someone is charming and not hypocritical, then he is both big and logical, and vice versa.
If someone is charming or he is not hypocritical, then he is not big.
Philbert is not charming if and only if Amanda is not acceptable.
Someone being both hypocritical and logical is equivalent to being charming. | Albert is logical. | entailment |
Theobold is not hypocritical.
Albert is logical.
Silas is wandering.
Amanda is hypocritical.
Amanda is not wandering.
Silas is logical.
Michael is not wandering.
Kimball is not wandering.
Philbert is charming.
Michael is not charming.
Theobold is not charming.
Theobold is wandering.If Theobold is not logical and Silas is not acceptable, then Philbert is charming.
If there is someone who is either not big or not charming, then Michael is not wandering.
Silas being wandering and Philbert being not hypocritical imply that Amanda is logical.
It can be concluded that Philbert is not logical once knowing that Kimball is big or Silas is not hypocritical.
If there is at least one people who is acceptable, then Michael is not logical.
If someone is not charming, then he is wandering, and vice versa.
If someone is not acceptable, then he is not wandering, and vice versa.
Someone being big is equivalent to being not hypocritical.
If someone is charming and not hypocritical, then he is both big and logical, and vice versa.
If someone is charming or he is not hypocritical, then he is not big.
Philbert is not charming if and only if Amanda is not acceptable.
Someone being both hypocritical and logical is equivalent to being charming. | Amanda is not acceptable. | entailment |
Theobold is not hypocritical.
Albert is logical.
Silas is wandering.
Amanda is hypocritical.
Amanda is not wandering.
Silas is logical.
Michael is not wandering.
Kimball is not wandering.
Philbert is charming.
Michael is not charming.
Theobold is not charming.
Theobold is wandering.If Theobold is not logical and Silas is not acceptable, then Philbert is charming.
If there is someone who is either not big or not charming, then Michael is not wandering.
Silas being wandering and Philbert being not hypocritical imply that Amanda is logical.
It can be concluded that Philbert is not logical once knowing that Kimball is big or Silas is not hypocritical.
If there is at least one people who is acceptable, then Michael is not logical.
If someone is not charming, then he is wandering, and vice versa.
If someone is not acceptable, then he is not wandering, and vice versa.
Someone being big is equivalent to being not hypocritical.
If someone is charming and not hypocritical, then he is both big and logical, and vice versa.
If someone is charming or he is not hypocritical, then he is not big.
Philbert is not charming if and only if Amanda is not acceptable.
Someone being both hypocritical and logical is equivalent to being charming. | Kimball is charming. | neutral |
Theobold is not hypocritical.
Albert is logical.
Silas is wandering.
Amanda is hypocritical.
Amanda is not wandering.
Silas is logical.
Michael is not wandering.
Kimball is not wandering.
Philbert is charming.
Michael is not charming.
Theobold is not charming.
Theobold is wandering.If Theobold is not logical and Silas is not acceptable, then Philbert is charming.
If there is someone who is either not big or not charming, then Michael is not wandering.
Silas being wandering and Philbert being not hypocritical imply that Amanda is logical.
It can be concluded that Philbert is not logical once knowing that Kimball is big or Silas is not hypocritical.
If there is at least one people who is acceptable, then Michael is not logical.
If someone is not charming, then he is wandering, and vice versa.
If someone is not acceptable, then he is not wandering, and vice versa.
Someone being big is equivalent to being not hypocritical.
If someone is charming and not hypocritical, then he is both big and logical, and vice versa.
If someone is charming or he is not hypocritical, then he is not big.
Philbert is not charming if and only if Amanda is not acceptable.
Someone being both hypocritical and logical is equivalent to being charming. | Kimball is wandering. | contradiction |
Theobold is not hypocritical.
Albert is logical.
Silas is wandering.
Amanda is hypocritical.
Amanda is not wandering.
Silas is logical.
Michael is not wandering.
Kimball is not wandering.
Philbert is charming.
Michael is not charming.
Theobold is not charming.
Theobold is wandering.If Theobold is not logical and Silas is not acceptable, then Philbert is charming.
If there is someone who is either not big or not charming, then Michael is not wandering.
Silas being wandering and Philbert being not hypocritical imply that Amanda is logical.
It can be concluded that Philbert is not logical once knowing that Kimball is big or Silas is not hypocritical.
If there is at least one people who is acceptable, then Michael is not logical.
If someone is not charming, then he is wandering, and vice versa.
If someone is not acceptable, then he is not wandering, and vice versa.
Someone being big is equivalent to being not hypocritical.
If someone is charming and not hypocritical, then he is both big and logical, and vice versa.
If someone is charming or he is not hypocritical, then he is not big.
Philbert is not charming if and only if Amanda is not acceptable.
Someone being both hypocritical and logical is equivalent to being charming. | Theobold is big. | self_contradiction |
Theobold is not hypocritical.
Albert is logical.
Silas is wandering.
Amanda is hypocritical.
Amanda is not wandering.
Silas is logical.
Michael is not wandering.
Kimball is not wandering.
Philbert is charming.
Michael is not charming.
Theobold is not charming.
Theobold is wandering.If Theobold is not logical and Silas is not acceptable, then Philbert is charming.
If there is someone who is either not big or not charming, then Michael is not wandering.
Silas being wandering and Philbert being not hypocritical imply that Amanda is logical.
It can be concluded that Philbert is not logical once knowing that Kimball is big or Silas is not hypocritical.
If there is at least one people who is acceptable, then Michael is not logical.
If someone is not charming, then he is wandering, and vice versa.
If someone is not acceptable, then he is not wandering, and vice versa.
Someone being big is equivalent to being not hypocritical.
If someone is charming and not hypocritical, then he is both big and logical, and vice versa.
If someone is charming or he is not hypocritical, then he is not big.
Philbert is not charming if and only if Amanda is not acceptable.
Someone being both hypocritical and logical is equivalent to being charming. | Philbert is not big. | entailment |
Theobold is not hypocritical.
Albert is logical.
Silas is wandering.
Amanda is hypocritical.
Amanda is not wandering.
Silas is logical.
Michael is not wandering.
Kimball is not wandering.
Philbert is charming.
Michael is not charming.
Theobold is not charming.
Theobold is wandering.If Theobold is not logical and Silas is not acceptable, then Philbert is charming.
If there is someone who is either not big or not charming, then Michael is not wandering.
Silas being wandering and Philbert being not hypocritical imply that Amanda is logical.
It can be concluded that Philbert is not logical once knowing that Kimball is big or Silas is not hypocritical.
If there is at least one people who is acceptable, then Michael is not logical.
If someone is not charming, then he is wandering, and vice versa.
If someone is not acceptable, then he is not wandering, and vice versa.
Someone being big is equivalent to being not hypocritical.
If someone is charming and not hypocritical, then he is both big and logical, and vice versa.
If someone is charming or he is not hypocritical, then he is not big.
Philbert is not charming if and only if Amanda is not acceptable.
Someone being both hypocritical and logical is equivalent to being charming. | Philbert is charming. | self_contradiction |
Theobold is not hypocritical.
Albert is logical.
Silas is wandering.
Amanda is hypocritical.
Amanda is not wandering.
Silas is logical.
Michael is not wandering.
Kimball is not wandering.
Philbert is charming.
Michael is not charming.
Theobold is not charming.
Theobold is wandering.If Theobold is not logical and Silas is not acceptable, then Philbert is charming.
If there is someone who is either not big or not charming, then Michael is not wandering.
Silas being wandering and Philbert being not hypocritical imply that Amanda is logical.
It can be concluded that Philbert is not logical once knowing that Kimball is big or Silas is not hypocritical.
If there is at least one people who is acceptable, then Michael is not logical.
If someone is not charming, then he is wandering, and vice versa.
If someone is not acceptable, then he is not wandering, and vice versa.
Someone being big is equivalent to being not hypocritical.
If someone is charming and not hypocritical, then he is both big and logical, and vice versa.
If someone is charming or he is not hypocritical, then he is not big.
Philbert is not charming if and only if Amanda is not acceptable.
Someone being both hypocritical and logical is equivalent to being charming. | Amanda is not hypocritical. | contradiction |
Theobold is not hypocritical.
Albert is logical.
Silas is wandering.
Amanda is hypocritical.
Amanda is not wandering.
Silas is logical.
Michael is not wandering.
Kimball is not wandering.
Philbert is charming.
Michael is not charming.
Theobold is not charming.
Theobold is wandering.If Theobold is not logical and Silas is not acceptable, then Philbert is charming.
If there is someone who is either not big or not charming, then Michael is not wandering.
Silas being wandering and Philbert being not hypocritical imply that Amanda is logical.
It can be concluded that Philbert is not logical once knowing that Kimball is big or Silas is not hypocritical.
If there is at least one people who is acceptable, then Michael is not logical.
If someone is not charming, then he is wandering, and vice versa.
If someone is not acceptable, then he is not wandering, and vice versa.
Someone being big is equivalent to being not hypocritical.
If someone is charming and not hypocritical, then he is both big and logical, and vice versa.
If someone is charming or he is not hypocritical, then he is not big.
Philbert is not charming if and only if Amanda is not acceptable.
Someone being both hypocritical and logical is equivalent to being charming. | Philbert is hypocritical. | entailment |
Theobold is not hypocritical.
Albert is logical.
Silas is wandering.
Amanda is hypocritical.
Amanda is not wandering.
Silas is logical.
Michael is not wandering.
Kimball is not wandering.
Philbert is charming.
Michael is not charming.
Theobold is not charming.
Theobold is wandering.If Theobold is not logical and Silas is not acceptable, then Philbert is charming.
If there is someone who is either not big or not charming, then Michael is not wandering.
Silas being wandering and Philbert being not hypocritical imply that Amanda is logical.
It can be concluded that Philbert is not logical once knowing that Kimball is big or Silas is not hypocritical.
If there is at least one people who is acceptable, then Michael is not logical.
If someone is not charming, then he is wandering, and vice versa.
If someone is not acceptable, then he is not wandering, and vice versa.
Someone being big is equivalent to being not hypocritical.
If someone is charming and not hypocritical, then he is both big and logical, and vice versa.
If someone is charming or he is not hypocritical, then he is not big.
Philbert is not charming if and only if Amanda is not acceptable.
Someone being both hypocritical and logical is equivalent to being charming. | Theobold is not logical. | neutral |
Theobold is not hypocritical.
Albert is logical.
Silas is wandering.
Amanda is hypocritical.
Amanda is not wandering.
Silas is logical.
Michael is not wandering.
Kimball is not wandering.
Philbert is charming.
Michael is not charming.
Theobold is not charming.
Theobold is wandering.If Theobold is not logical and Silas is not acceptable, then Philbert is charming.
If there is someone who is either not big or not charming, then Michael is not wandering.
Silas being wandering and Philbert being not hypocritical imply that Amanda is logical.
It can be concluded that Philbert is not logical once knowing that Kimball is big or Silas is not hypocritical.
If there is at least one people who is acceptable, then Michael is not logical.
If someone is not charming, then he is wandering, and vice versa.
If someone is not acceptable, then he is not wandering, and vice versa.
Someone being big is equivalent to being not hypocritical.
If someone is charming and not hypocritical, then he is both big and logical, and vice versa.
If someone is charming or he is not hypocritical, then he is not big.
Philbert is not charming if and only if Amanda is not acceptable.
Someone being both hypocritical and logical is equivalent to being charming. | Michael is wandering. | self_contradiction |
Theobold is not hypocritical.
Albert is logical.
Silas is wandering.
Amanda is hypocritical.
Amanda is not wandering.
Silas is logical.
Michael is not wandering.
Kimball is not wandering.
Philbert is charming.
Michael is not charming.
Theobold is not charming.
Theobold is wandering.If Theobold is not logical and Silas is not acceptable, then Philbert is charming.
If there is someone who is either not big or not charming, then Michael is not wandering.
Silas being wandering and Philbert being not hypocritical imply that Amanda is logical.
It can be concluded that Philbert is not logical once knowing that Kimball is big or Silas is not hypocritical.
If there is at least one people who is acceptable, then Michael is not logical.
If someone is not charming, then he is wandering, and vice versa.
If someone is not acceptable, then he is not wandering, and vice versa.
Someone being big is equivalent to being not hypocritical.
If someone is charming and not hypocritical, then he is both big and logical, and vice versa.
If someone is charming or he is not hypocritical, then he is not big.
Philbert is not charming if and only if Amanda is not acceptable.
Someone being both hypocritical and logical is equivalent to being charming. | Michael is hypocritical. | neutral |
Sterling is not relevant.
Eunice is typical.
Kingston is not strange.
Kingston is embarrassed.
Eunice is dead.
Eunice is latter.
Bud is not strange.
Lincoln is not strange.
Kerry is typical.
Kerry is dead.
Lincoln is not typical.
Sterling is strange.Someone who is eithor latter or dead is always not relevant.
If there is at least one people who is both not latter and strange, then Sterling is not typical.
It can be concluded that Eunice is strange once knowing that Sabrina is relevant or Bud is not embarrassed.
If someone is latter, then he is relevant.
Someone who is not embarrassed is always not dead.
Someone who is eithor not strange or relevant is always not dead.
If there is at least one people who is typical, then Sabrina is not embarrassed and Bud is not latter.
It can be concluded that Bud is not latter once knowing that Bud is not relevant.
Sabrina is not strange and Sterling is not dead if and only if Kerry is latter and Lincoln is typical.
If Lincoln is not relevant, then Bud is dead and Kingston is typical, and vice versa.
Someone who is relevant is always both embarrassed and strange.
If someone is typical, then he is not strange, and vice versa. | Eunice is not relevant. | self_contradiction |
Sterling is not relevant.
Eunice is typical.
Kingston is not strange.
Kingston is embarrassed.
Eunice is dead.
Eunice is latter.
Bud is not strange.
Lincoln is not strange.
Kerry is typical.
Kerry is dead.
Lincoln is not typical.
Sterling is strange.Someone who is eithor latter or dead is always not relevant.
If there is at least one people who is both not latter and strange, then Sterling is not typical.
It can be concluded that Eunice is strange once knowing that Sabrina is relevant or Bud is not embarrassed.
If someone is latter, then he is relevant.
Someone who is not embarrassed is always not dead.
Someone who is eithor not strange or relevant is always not dead.
If there is at least one people who is typical, then Sabrina is not embarrassed and Bud is not latter.
It can be concluded that Bud is not latter once knowing that Bud is not relevant.
Sabrina is not strange and Sterling is not dead if and only if Kerry is latter and Lincoln is typical.
If Lincoln is not relevant, then Bud is dead and Kingston is typical, and vice versa.
Someone who is relevant is always both embarrassed and strange.
If someone is typical, then he is not strange, and vice versa. | Kerry is not typical. | contradiction |
Sterling is not relevant.
Eunice is typical.
Kingston is not strange.
Kingston is embarrassed.
Eunice is dead.
Eunice is latter.
Bud is not strange.
Lincoln is not strange.
Kerry is typical.
Kerry is dead.
Lincoln is not typical.
Sterling is strange.Someone who is eithor latter or dead is always not relevant.
If there is at least one people who is both not latter and strange, then Sterling is not typical.
It can be concluded that Eunice is strange once knowing that Sabrina is relevant or Bud is not embarrassed.
If someone is latter, then he is relevant.
Someone who is not embarrassed is always not dead.
Someone who is eithor not strange or relevant is always not dead.
If there is at least one people who is typical, then Sabrina is not embarrassed and Bud is not latter.
It can be concluded that Bud is not latter once knowing that Bud is not relevant.
Sabrina is not strange and Sterling is not dead if and only if Kerry is latter and Lincoln is typical.
If Lincoln is not relevant, then Bud is dead and Kingston is typical, and vice versa.
Someone who is relevant is always both embarrassed and strange.
If someone is typical, then he is not strange, and vice versa. | Sabrina is not relevant. | neutral |
Sterling is not relevant.
Eunice is typical.
Kingston is not strange.
Kingston is embarrassed.
Eunice is dead.
Eunice is latter.
Bud is not strange.
Lincoln is not strange.
Kerry is typical.
Kerry is dead.
Lincoln is not typical.
Sterling is strange.Someone who is eithor latter or dead is always not relevant.
If there is at least one people who is both not latter and strange, then Sterling is not typical.
It can be concluded that Eunice is strange once knowing that Sabrina is relevant or Bud is not embarrassed.
If someone is latter, then he is relevant.
Someone who is not embarrassed is always not dead.
Someone who is eithor not strange or relevant is always not dead.
If there is at least one people who is typical, then Sabrina is not embarrassed and Bud is not latter.
It can be concluded that Bud is not latter once knowing that Bud is not relevant.
Sabrina is not strange and Sterling is not dead if and only if Kerry is latter and Lincoln is typical.
If Lincoln is not relevant, then Bud is dead and Kingston is typical, and vice versa.
Someone who is relevant is always both embarrassed and strange.
If someone is typical, then he is not strange, and vice versa. | Eunice is dead. | self_contradiction |
Sterling is not relevant.
Eunice is typical.
Kingston is not strange.
Kingston is embarrassed.
Eunice is dead.
Eunice is latter.
Bud is not strange.
Lincoln is not strange.
Kerry is typical.
Kerry is dead.
Lincoln is not typical.
Sterling is strange.Someone who is eithor latter or dead is always not relevant.
If there is at least one people who is both not latter and strange, then Sterling is not typical.
It can be concluded that Eunice is strange once knowing that Sabrina is relevant or Bud is not embarrassed.
If someone is latter, then he is relevant.
Someone who is not embarrassed is always not dead.
Someone who is eithor not strange or relevant is always not dead.
If there is at least one people who is typical, then Sabrina is not embarrassed and Bud is not latter.
It can be concluded that Bud is not latter once knowing that Bud is not relevant.
Sabrina is not strange and Sterling is not dead if and only if Kerry is latter and Lincoln is typical.
If Lincoln is not relevant, then Bud is dead and Kingston is typical, and vice versa.
Someone who is relevant is always both embarrassed and strange.
If someone is typical, then he is not strange, and vice versa. | Kerry is not dead. | self_contradiction |
Sterling is not relevant.
Eunice is typical.
Kingston is not strange.
Kingston is embarrassed.
Eunice is dead.
Eunice is latter.
Bud is not strange.
Lincoln is not strange.
Kerry is typical.
Kerry is dead.
Lincoln is not typical.
Sterling is strange.Someone who is eithor latter or dead is always not relevant.
If there is at least one people who is both not latter and strange, then Sterling is not typical.
It can be concluded that Eunice is strange once knowing that Sabrina is relevant or Bud is not embarrassed.
If someone is latter, then he is relevant.
Someone who is not embarrassed is always not dead.
Someone who is eithor not strange or relevant is always not dead.
If there is at least one people who is typical, then Sabrina is not embarrassed and Bud is not latter.
It can be concluded that Bud is not latter once knowing that Bud is not relevant.
Sabrina is not strange and Sterling is not dead if and only if Kerry is latter and Lincoln is typical.
If Lincoln is not relevant, then Bud is dead and Kingston is typical, and vice versa.
Someone who is relevant is always both embarrassed and strange.
If someone is typical, then he is not strange, and vice versa. | Bud is strange. | contradiction |
Sterling is not relevant.
Eunice is typical.
Kingston is not strange.
Kingston is embarrassed.
Eunice is dead.
Eunice is latter.
Bud is not strange.
Lincoln is not strange.
Kerry is typical.
Kerry is dead.
Lincoln is not typical.
Sterling is strange.Someone who is eithor latter or dead is always not relevant.
If there is at least one people who is both not latter and strange, then Sterling is not typical.
It can be concluded that Eunice is strange once knowing that Sabrina is relevant or Bud is not embarrassed.
If someone is latter, then he is relevant.
Someone who is not embarrassed is always not dead.
Someone who is eithor not strange or relevant is always not dead.
If there is at least one people who is typical, then Sabrina is not embarrassed and Bud is not latter.
It can be concluded that Bud is not latter once knowing that Bud is not relevant.
Sabrina is not strange and Sterling is not dead if and only if Kerry is latter and Lincoln is typical.
If Lincoln is not relevant, then Bud is dead and Kingston is typical, and vice versa.
Someone who is relevant is always both embarrassed and strange.
If someone is typical, then he is not strange, and vice versa. | Bud is relevant. | neutral |
Sterling is not relevant.
Eunice is typical.
Kingston is not strange.
Kingston is embarrassed.
Eunice is dead.
Eunice is latter.
Bud is not strange.
Lincoln is not strange.
Kerry is typical.
Kerry is dead.
Lincoln is not typical.
Sterling is strange.Someone who is eithor latter or dead is always not relevant.
If there is at least one people who is both not latter and strange, then Sterling is not typical.
It can be concluded that Eunice is strange once knowing that Sabrina is relevant or Bud is not embarrassed.
If someone is latter, then he is relevant.
Someone who is not embarrassed is always not dead.
Someone who is eithor not strange or relevant is always not dead.
If there is at least one people who is typical, then Sabrina is not embarrassed and Bud is not latter.
It can be concluded that Bud is not latter once knowing that Bud is not relevant.
Sabrina is not strange and Sterling is not dead if and only if Kerry is latter and Lincoln is typical.
If Lincoln is not relevant, then Bud is dead and Kingston is typical, and vice versa.
Someone who is relevant is always both embarrassed and strange.
If someone is typical, then he is not strange, and vice versa. | Lincoln is latter. | neutral |
Sterling is not relevant.
Eunice is typical.
Kingston is not strange.
Kingston is embarrassed.
Eunice is dead.
Eunice is latter.
Bud is not strange.
Lincoln is not strange.
Kerry is typical.
Kerry is dead.
Lincoln is not typical.
Sterling is strange.Someone who is eithor latter or dead is always not relevant.
If there is at least one people who is both not latter and strange, then Sterling is not typical.
It can be concluded that Eunice is strange once knowing that Sabrina is relevant or Bud is not embarrassed.
If someone is latter, then he is relevant.
Someone who is not embarrassed is always not dead.
Someone who is eithor not strange or relevant is always not dead.
If there is at least one people who is typical, then Sabrina is not embarrassed and Bud is not latter.
It can be concluded that Bud is not latter once knowing that Bud is not relevant.
Sabrina is not strange and Sterling is not dead if and only if Kerry is latter and Lincoln is typical.
If Lincoln is not relevant, then Bud is dead and Kingston is typical, and vice versa.
Someone who is relevant is always both embarrassed and strange.
If someone is typical, then he is not strange, and vice versa. | Sterling is not relevant. | entailment |
Sterling is not relevant.
Eunice is typical.
Kingston is not strange.
Kingston is embarrassed.
Eunice is dead.
Eunice is latter.
Bud is not strange.
Lincoln is not strange.
Kerry is typical.
Kerry is dead.
Lincoln is not typical.
Sterling is strange.Someone who is eithor latter or dead is always not relevant.
If there is at least one people who is both not latter and strange, then Sterling is not typical.
It can be concluded that Eunice is strange once knowing that Sabrina is relevant or Bud is not embarrassed.
If someone is latter, then he is relevant.
Someone who is not embarrassed is always not dead.
Someone who is eithor not strange or relevant is always not dead.
If there is at least one people who is typical, then Sabrina is not embarrassed and Bud is not latter.
It can be concluded that Bud is not latter once knowing that Bud is not relevant.
Sabrina is not strange and Sterling is not dead if and only if Kerry is latter and Lincoln is typical.
If Lincoln is not relevant, then Bud is dead and Kingston is typical, and vice versa.
Someone who is relevant is always both embarrassed and strange.
If someone is typical, then he is not strange, and vice versa. | Eunice is not latter. | contradiction |
Sterling is not relevant.
Eunice is typical.
Kingston is not strange.
Kingston is embarrassed.
Eunice is dead.
Eunice is latter.
Bud is not strange.
Lincoln is not strange.
Kerry is typical.
Kerry is dead.
Lincoln is not typical.
Sterling is strange.Someone who is eithor latter or dead is always not relevant.
If there is at least one people who is both not latter and strange, then Sterling is not typical.
It can be concluded that Eunice is strange once knowing that Sabrina is relevant or Bud is not embarrassed.
If someone is latter, then he is relevant.
Someone who is not embarrassed is always not dead.
Someone who is eithor not strange or relevant is always not dead.
If there is at least one people who is typical, then Sabrina is not embarrassed and Bud is not latter.
It can be concluded that Bud is not latter once knowing that Bud is not relevant.
Sabrina is not strange and Sterling is not dead if and only if Kerry is latter and Lincoln is typical.
If Lincoln is not relevant, then Bud is dead and Kingston is typical, and vice versa.
Someone who is relevant is always both embarrassed and strange.
If someone is typical, then he is not strange, and vice versa. | Bud is not latter. | entailment |
Sterling is not relevant.
Eunice is typical.
Kingston is not strange.
Kingston is embarrassed.
Eunice is dead.
Eunice is latter.
Bud is not strange.
Lincoln is not strange.
Kerry is typical.
Kerry is dead.
Lincoln is not typical.
Sterling is strange.Someone who is eithor latter or dead is always not relevant.
If there is at least one people who is both not latter and strange, then Sterling is not typical.
It can be concluded that Eunice is strange once knowing that Sabrina is relevant or Bud is not embarrassed.
If someone is latter, then he is relevant.
Someone who is not embarrassed is always not dead.
Someone who is eithor not strange or relevant is always not dead.
If there is at least one people who is typical, then Sabrina is not embarrassed and Bud is not latter.
It can be concluded that Bud is not latter once knowing that Bud is not relevant.
Sabrina is not strange and Sterling is not dead if and only if Kerry is latter and Lincoln is typical.
If Lincoln is not relevant, then Bud is dead and Kingston is typical, and vice versa.
Someone who is relevant is always both embarrassed and strange.
If someone is typical, then he is not strange, and vice versa. | Eunice is typical. | entailment |
Sterling is not relevant.
Eunice is typical.
Kingston is not strange.
Kingston is embarrassed.
Eunice is dead.
Eunice is latter.
Bud is not strange.
Lincoln is not strange.
Kerry is typical.
Kerry is dead.
Lincoln is not typical.
Sterling is strange.Someone who is eithor latter or dead is always not relevant.
If there is at least one people who is both not latter and strange, then Sterling is not typical.
It can be concluded that Eunice is strange once knowing that Sabrina is relevant or Bud is not embarrassed.
If someone is latter, then he is relevant.
Someone who is not embarrassed is always not dead.
Someone who is eithor not strange or relevant is always not dead.
If there is at least one people who is typical, then Sabrina is not embarrassed and Bud is not latter.
It can be concluded that Bud is not latter once knowing that Bud is not relevant.
Sabrina is not strange and Sterling is not dead if and only if Kerry is latter and Lincoln is typical.
If Lincoln is not relevant, then Bud is dead and Kingston is typical, and vice versa.
Someone who is relevant is always both embarrassed and strange.
If someone is typical, then he is not strange, and vice versa. | Kerry is relevant. | contradiction |
Sterling is not relevant.
Eunice is typical.
Kingston is not strange.
Kingston is embarrassed.
Eunice is dead.
Eunice is latter.
Bud is not strange.
Lincoln is not strange.
Kerry is typical.
Kerry is dead.
Lincoln is not typical.
Sterling is strange.Someone who is eithor latter or dead is always not relevant.
If there is at least one people who is both not latter and strange, then Sterling is not typical.
It can be concluded that Eunice is strange once knowing that Sabrina is relevant or Bud is not embarrassed.
If someone is latter, then he is relevant.
Someone who is not embarrassed is always not dead.
Someone who is eithor not strange or relevant is always not dead.
If there is at least one people who is typical, then Sabrina is not embarrassed and Bud is not latter.
It can be concluded that Bud is not latter once knowing that Bud is not relevant.
Sabrina is not strange and Sterling is not dead if and only if Kerry is latter and Lincoln is typical.
If Lincoln is not relevant, then Bud is dead and Kingston is typical, and vice versa.
Someone who is relevant is always both embarrassed and strange.
If someone is typical, then he is not strange, and vice versa. | Sterling is not typical. | neutral |
Sterling is not relevant.
Eunice is typical.
Kingston is not strange.
Kingston is embarrassed.
Eunice is dead.
Eunice is latter.
Bud is not strange.
Lincoln is not strange.
Kerry is typical.
Kerry is dead.
Lincoln is not typical.
Sterling is strange.Someone who is eithor latter or dead is always not relevant.
If there is at least one people who is both not latter and strange, then Sterling is not typical.
It can be concluded that Eunice is strange once knowing that Sabrina is relevant or Bud is not embarrassed.
If someone is latter, then he is relevant.
Someone who is not embarrassed is always not dead.
Someone who is eithor not strange or relevant is always not dead.
If there is at least one people who is typical, then Sabrina is not embarrassed and Bud is not latter.
It can be concluded that Bud is not latter once knowing that Bud is not relevant.
Sabrina is not strange and Sterling is not dead if and only if Kerry is latter and Lincoln is typical.
If Lincoln is not relevant, then Bud is dead and Kingston is typical, and vice versa.
Someone who is relevant is always both embarrassed and strange.
If someone is typical, then he is not strange, and vice versa. | Kerry is not strange. | entailment |
Sterling is not relevant.
Eunice is typical.
Kingston is not strange.
Kingston is embarrassed.
Eunice is dead.
Eunice is latter.
Bud is not strange.
Lincoln is not strange.
Kerry is typical.
Kerry is dead.
Lincoln is not typical.
Sterling is strange.Someone who is eithor latter or dead is always not relevant.
If there is at least one people who is both not latter and strange, then Sterling is not typical.
It can be concluded that Eunice is strange once knowing that Sabrina is relevant or Bud is not embarrassed.
If someone is latter, then he is relevant.
Someone who is not embarrassed is always not dead.
Someone who is eithor not strange or relevant is always not dead.
If there is at least one people who is typical, then Sabrina is not embarrassed and Bud is not latter.
It can be concluded that Bud is not latter once knowing that Bud is not relevant.
Sabrina is not strange and Sterling is not dead if and only if Kerry is latter and Lincoln is typical.
If Lincoln is not relevant, then Bud is dead and Kingston is typical, and vice versa.
Someone who is relevant is always both embarrassed and strange.
If someone is typical, then he is not strange, and vice versa. | Sabrina is not typical. | neutral |
Sterling is not relevant.
Eunice is typical.
Kingston is not strange.
Kingston is embarrassed.
Eunice is dead.
Eunice is latter.
Bud is not strange.
Lincoln is not strange.
Kerry is typical.
Kerry is dead.
Lincoln is not typical.
Sterling is strange.Someone who is eithor latter or dead is always not relevant.
If there is at least one people who is both not latter and strange, then Sterling is not typical.
It can be concluded that Eunice is strange once knowing that Sabrina is relevant or Bud is not embarrassed.
If someone is latter, then he is relevant.
Someone who is not embarrassed is always not dead.
Someone who is eithor not strange or relevant is always not dead.
If there is at least one people who is typical, then Sabrina is not embarrassed and Bud is not latter.
It can be concluded that Bud is not latter once knowing that Bud is not relevant.
Sabrina is not strange and Sterling is not dead if and only if Kerry is latter and Lincoln is typical.
If Lincoln is not relevant, then Bud is dead and Kingston is typical, and vice versa.
Someone who is relevant is always both embarrassed and strange.
If someone is typical, then he is not strange, and vice versa. | Sabrina is embarrassed. | contradiction |
Sterling is not relevant.
Eunice is typical.
Kingston is not strange.
Kingston is embarrassed.
Eunice is dead.
Eunice is latter.
Bud is not strange.
Lincoln is not strange.
Kerry is typical.
Kerry is dead.
Lincoln is not typical.
Sterling is strange.Someone who is eithor latter or dead is always not relevant.
If there is at least one people who is both not latter and strange, then Sterling is not typical.
It can be concluded that Eunice is strange once knowing that Sabrina is relevant or Bud is not embarrassed.
If someone is latter, then he is relevant.
Someone who is not embarrassed is always not dead.
Someone who is eithor not strange or relevant is always not dead.
If there is at least one people who is typical, then Sabrina is not embarrassed and Bud is not latter.
It can be concluded that Bud is not latter once knowing that Bud is not relevant.
Sabrina is not strange and Sterling is not dead if and only if Kerry is latter and Lincoln is typical.
If Lincoln is not relevant, then Bud is dead and Kingston is typical, and vice versa.
Someone who is relevant is always both embarrassed and strange.
If someone is typical, then he is not strange, and vice versa. | Eunice is latter. | entailment |
Sterling is not relevant.
Eunice is typical.
Kingston is not strange.
Kingston is embarrassed.
Eunice is dead.
Eunice is latter.
Bud is not strange.
Lincoln is not strange.
Kerry is typical.
Kerry is dead.
Lincoln is not typical.
Sterling is strange.Someone who is eithor latter or dead is always not relevant.
If there is at least one people who is both not latter and strange, then Sterling is not typical.
It can be concluded that Eunice is strange once knowing that Sabrina is relevant or Bud is not embarrassed.
If someone is latter, then he is relevant.
Someone who is not embarrassed is always not dead.
Someone who is eithor not strange or relevant is always not dead.
If there is at least one people who is typical, then Sabrina is not embarrassed and Bud is not latter.
It can be concluded that Bud is not latter once knowing that Bud is not relevant.
Sabrina is not strange and Sterling is not dead if and only if Kerry is latter and Lincoln is typical.
If Lincoln is not relevant, then Bud is dead and Kingston is typical, and vice versa.
Someone who is relevant is always both embarrassed and strange.
If someone is typical, then he is not strange, and vice versa. | Eunice is not strange. | self_contradiction |
Sterling is not relevant.
Eunice is typical.
Kingston is not strange.
Kingston is embarrassed.
Eunice is dead.
Eunice is latter.
Bud is not strange.
Lincoln is not strange.
Kerry is typical.
Kerry is dead.
Lincoln is not typical.
Sterling is strange.Someone who is eithor latter or dead is always not relevant.
If there is at least one people who is both not latter and strange, then Sterling is not typical.
It can be concluded that Eunice is strange once knowing that Sabrina is relevant or Bud is not embarrassed.
If someone is latter, then he is relevant.
Someone who is not embarrassed is always not dead.
Someone who is eithor not strange or relevant is always not dead.
If there is at least one people who is typical, then Sabrina is not embarrassed and Bud is not latter.
It can be concluded that Bud is not latter once knowing that Bud is not relevant.
Sabrina is not strange and Sterling is not dead if and only if Kerry is latter and Lincoln is typical.
If Lincoln is not relevant, then Bud is dead and Kingston is typical, and vice versa.
Someone who is relevant is always both embarrassed and strange.
If someone is typical, then he is not strange, and vice versa. | Kerry is dead. | self_contradiction |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.