premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Garrick is not vivacious.
Joshua is logical.
Bryant is not electrical.
Garrick is not humorous.
Bryant is popular.
Olin is not popular.
Garrick is informal.
Eunice is informal.
Bryant is not logical.
Eunice is not popular.
Nathalie is electrical.
Olin is not humorous.if there is at least one people who is not logical and not informal, then Olin is not humorous and Nathalie is not electrical.
If there is someone who is both not informal and electrical, then Shelley is logical.
Someone who is eithor not logical or electrical is always not vivacious.
If someone is not vivacious or not electrical, then he is logical.
Bryant is vivacious and Joshua is electrical if and only if Olin is not informal and Nathalie is popular.
If all people are not logical or humorous, then Eunice is not popular.
Someone who is not popular is always not logical.
If someone is both not humorous and informal, then he is popular.
If there is someone who is not electrical, then Eunice is vivacious and Olin is informal.
If someone is informal, then he is both vivacious and not electrical.
If someone is both not electrical and not popular, then he is humorous.
If there is someone who is logical, then Bryant is not vivacious and Garrick is electrical. | Bryant is logical. | self_contradiction |
Garrick is not vivacious.
Joshua is logical.
Bryant is not electrical.
Garrick is not humorous.
Bryant is popular.
Olin is not popular.
Garrick is informal.
Eunice is informal.
Bryant is not logical.
Eunice is not popular.
Nathalie is electrical.
Olin is not humorous.if there is at least one people who is not logical and not informal, then Olin is not humorous and Nathalie is not electrical.
If there is someone who is both not informal and electrical, then Shelley is logical.
Someone who is eithor not logical or electrical is always not vivacious.
If someone is not vivacious or not electrical, then he is logical.
Bryant is vivacious and Joshua is electrical if and only if Olin is not informal and Nathalie is popular.
If all people are not logical or humorous, then Eunice is not popular.
Someone who is not popular is always not logical.
If someone is both not humorous and informal, then he is popular.
If there is someone who is not electrical, then Eunice is vivacious and Olin is informal.
If someone is informal, then he is both vivacious and not electrical.
If someone is both not electrical and not popular, then he is humorous.
If there is someone who is logical, then Bryant is not vivacious and Garrick is electrical. | Bryant is not humorous. | neutral |
Garrick is not vivacious.
Joshua is logical.
Bryant is not electrical.
Garrick is not humorous.
Bryant is popular.
Olin is not popular.
Garrick is informal.
Eunice is informal.
Bryant is not logical.
Eunice is not popular.
Nathalie is electrical.
Olin is not humorous.if there is at least one people who is not logical and not informal, then Olin is not humorous and Nathalie is not electrical.
If there is someone who is both not informal and electrical, then Shelley is logical.
Someone who is eithor not logical or electrical is always not vivacious.
If someone is not vivacious or not electrical, then he is logical.
Bryant is vivacious and Joshua is electrical if and only if Olin is not informal and Nathalie is popular.
If all people are not logical or humorous, then Eunice is not popular.
Someone who is not popular is always not logical.
If someone is both not humorous and informal, then he is popular.
If there is someone who is not electrical, then Eunice is vivacious and Olin is informal.
If someone is informal, then he is both vivacious and not electrical.
If someone is both not electrical and not popular, then he is humorous.
If there is someone who is logical, then Bryant is not vivacious and Garrick is electrical. | Joshua is electrical. | neutral |
Garrick is not vivacious.
Joshua is logical.
Bryant is not electrical.
Garrick is not humorous.
Bryant is popular.
Olin is not popular.
Garrick is informal.
Eunice is informal.
Bryant is not logical.
Eunice is not popular.
Nathalie is electrical.
Olin is not humorous.if there is at least one people who is not logical and not informal, then Olin is not humorous and Nathalie is not electrical.
If there is someone who is both not informal and electrical, then Shelley is logical.
Someone who is eithor not logical or electrical is always not vivacious.
If someone is not vivacious or not electrical, then he is logical.
Bryant is vivacious and Joshua is electrical if and only if Olin is not informal and Nathalie is popular.
If all people are not logical or humorous, then Eunice is not popular.
Someone who is not popular is always not logical.
If someone is both not humorous and informal, then he is popular.
If there is someone who is not electrical, then Eunice is vivacious and Olin is informal.
If someone is informal, then he is both vivacious and not electrical.
If someone is both not electrical and not popular, then he is humorous.
If there is someone who is logical, then Bryant is not vivacious and Garrick is electrical. | Eunice is not logical. | self_contradiction |
Garrick is not vivacious.
Joshua is logical.
Bryant is not electrical.
Garrick is not humorous.
Bryant is popular.
Olin is not popular.
Garrick is informal.
Eunice is informal.
Bryant is not logical.
Eunice is not popular.
Nathalie is electrical.
Olin is not humorous.if there is at least one people who is not logical and not informal, then Olin is not humorous and Nathalie is not electrical.
If there is someone who is both not informal and electrical, then Shelley is logical.
Someone who is eithor not logical or electrical is always not vivacious.
If someone is not vivacious or not electrical, then he is logical.
Bryant is vivacious and Joshua is electrical if and only if Olin is not informal and Nathalie is popular.
If all people are not logical or humorous, then Eunice is not popular.
Someone who is not popular is always not logical.
If someone is both not humorous and informal, then he is popular.
If there is someone who is not electrical, then Eunice is vivacious and Olin is informal.
If someone is informal, then he is both vivacious and not electrical.
If someone is both not electrical and not popular, then he is humorous.
If there is someone who is logical, then Bryant is not vivacious and Garrick is electrical. | Garrick is not popular. | contradiction |
Garrick is not vivacious.
Joshua is logical.
Bryant is not electrical.
Garrick is not humorous.
Bryant is popular.
Olin is not popular.
Garrick is informal.
Eunice is informal.
Bryant is not logical.
Eunice is not popular.
Nathalie is electrical.
Olin is not humorous.if there is at least one people who is not logical and not informal, then Olin is not humorous and Nathalie is not electrical.
If there is someone who is both not informal and electrical, then Shelley is logical.
Someone who is eithor not logical or electrical is always not vivacious.
If someone is not vivacious or not electrical, then he is logical.
Bryant is vivacious and Joshua is electrical if and only if Olin is not informal and Nathalie is popular.
If all people are not logical or humorous, then Eunice is not popular.
Someone who is not popular is always not logical.
If someone is both not humorous and informal, then he is popular.
If there is someone who is not electrical, then Eunice is vivacious and Olin is informal.
If someone is informal, then he is both vivacious and not electrical.
If someone is both not electrical and not popular, then he is humorous.
If there is someone who is logical, then Bryant is not vivacious and Garrick is electrical. | Nathalie is not vivacious. | entailment |
Garrick is not vivacious.
Joshua is logical.
Bryant is not electrical.
Garrick is not humorous.
Bryant is popular.
Olin is not popular.
Garrick is informal.
Eunice is informal.
Bryant is not logical.
Eunice is not popular.
Nathalie is electrical.
Olin is not humorous.if there is at least one people who is not logical and not informal, then Olin is not humorous and Nathalie is not electrical.
If there is someone who is both not informal and electrical, then Shelley is logical.
Someone who is eithor not logical or electrical is always not vivacious.
If someone is not vivacious or not electrical, then he is logical.
Bryant is vivacious and Joshua is electrical if and only if Olin is not informal and Nathalie is popular.
If all people are not logical or humorous, then Eunice is not popular.
Someone who is not popular is always not logical.
If someone is both not humorous and informal, then he is popular.
If there is someone who is not electrical, then Eunice is vivacious and Olin is informal.
If someone is informal, then he is both vivacious and not electrical.
If someone is both not electrical and not popular, then he is humorous.
If there is someone who is logical, then Bryant is not vivacious and Garrick is electrical. | Bryant is not popular. | contradiction |
Garrick is not vivacious.
Joshua is logical.
Bryant is not electrical.
Garrick is not humorous.
Bryant is popular.
Olin is not popular.
Garrick is informal.
Eunice is informal.
Bryant is not logical.
Eunice is not popular.
Nathalie is electrical.
Olin is not humorous.if there is at least one people who is not logical and not informal, then Olin is not humorous and Nathalie is not electrical.
If there is someone who is both not informal and electrical, then Shelley is logical.
Someone who is eithor not logical or electrical is always not vivacious.
If someone is not vivacious or not electrical, then he is logical.
Bryant is vivacious and Joshua is electrical if and only if Olin is not informal and Nathalie is popular.
If all people are not logical or humorous, then Eunice is not popular.
Someone who is not popular is always not logical.
If someone is both not humorous and informal, then he is popular.
If there is someone who is not electrical, then Eunice is vivacious and Olin is informal.
If someone is informal, then he is both vivacious and not electrical.
If someone is both not electrical and not popular, then he is humorous.
If there is someone who is logical, then Bryant is not vivacious and Garrick is electrical. | Eunice is not electrical. | entailment |
Garrick is not vivacious.
Joshua is logical.
Bryant is not electrical.
Garrick is not humorous.
Bryant is popular.
Olin is not popular.
Garrick is informal.
Eunice is informal.
Bryant is not logical.
Eunice is not popular.
Nathalie is electrical.
Olin is not humorous.if there is at least one people who is not logical and not informal, then Olin is not humorous and Nathalie is not electrical.
If there is someone who is both not informal and electrical, then Shelley is logical.
Someone who is eithor not logical or electrical is always not vivacious.
If someone is not vivacious or not electrical, then he is logical.
Bryant is vivacious and Joshua is electrical if and only if Olin is not informal and Nathalie is popular.
If all people are not logical or humorous, then Eunice is not popular.
Someone who is not popular is always not logical.
If someone is both not humorous and informal, then he is popular.
If there is someone who is not electrical, then Eunice is vivacious and Olin is informal.
If someone is informal, then he is both vivacious and not electrical.
If someone is both not electrical and not popular, then he is humorous.
If there is someone who is logical, then Bryant is not vivacious and Garrick is electrical. | Eunice is not humorous. | contradiction |
Garrick is not vivacious.
Joshua is logical.
Bryant is not electrical.
Garrick is not humorous.
Bryant is popular.
Olin is not popular.
Garrick is informal.
Eunice is informal.
Bryant is not logical.
Eunice is not popular.
Nathalie is electrical.
Olin is not humorous.if there is at least one people who is not logical and not informal, then Olin is not humorous and Nathalie is not electrical.
If there is someone who is both not informal and electrical, then Shelley is logical.
Someone who is eithor not logical or electrical is always not vivacious.
If someone is not vivacious or not electrical, then he is logical.
Bryant is vivacious and Joshua is electrical if and only if Olin is not informal and Nathalie is popular.
If all people are not logical or humorous, then Eunice is not popular.
Someone who is not popular is always not logical.
If someone is both not humorous and informal, then he is popular.
If there is someone who is not electrical, then Eunice is vivacious and Olin is informal.
If someone is informal, then he is both vivacious and not electrical.
If someone is both not electrical and not popular, then he is humorous.
If there is someone who is logical, then Bryant is not vivacious and Garrick is electrical. | Eunice is humorous. | entailment |
Garrick is not vivacious.
Joshua is logical.
Bryant is not electrical.
Garrick is not humorous.
Bryant is popular.
Olin is not popular.
Garrick is informal.
Eunice is informal.
Bryant is not logical.
Eunice is not popular.
Nathalie is electrical.
Olin is not humorous.if there is at least one people who is not logical and not informal, then Olin is not humorous and Nathalie is not electrical.
If there is someone who is both not informal and electrical, then Shelley is logical.
Someone who is eithor not logical or electrical is always not vivacious.
If someone is not vivacious or not electrical, then he is logical.
Bryant is vivacious and Joshua is electrical if and only if Olin is not informal and Nathalie is popular.
If all people are not logical or humorous, then Eunice is not popular.
Someone who is not popular is always not logical.
If someone is both not humorous and informal, then he is popular.
If there is someone who is not electrical, then Eunice is vivacious and Olin is informal.
If someone is informal, then he is both vivacious and not electrical.
If someone is both not electrical and not popular, then he is humorous.
If there is someone who is logical, then Bryant is not vivacious and Garrick is electrical. | Olin is not vivacious. | self_contradiction |
Garrick is not vivacious.
Joshua is logical.
Bryant is not electrical.
Garrick is not humorous.
Bryant is popular.
Olin is not popular.
Garrick is informal.
Eunice is informal.
Bryant is not logical.
Eunice is not popular.
Nathalie is electrical.
Olin is not humorous.if there is at least one people who is not logical and not informal, then Olin is not humorous and Nathalie is not electrical.
If there is someone who is both not informal and electrical, then Shelley is logical.
Someone who is eithor not logical or electrical is always not vivacious.
If someone is not vivacious or not electrical, then he is logical.
Bryant is vivacious and Joshua is electrical if and only if Olin is not informal and Nathalie is popular.
If all people are not logical or humorous, then Eunice is not popular.
Someone who is not popular is always not logical.
If someone is both not humorous and informal, then he is popular.
If there is someone who is not electrical, then Eunice is vivacious and Olin is informal.
If someone is informal, then he is both vivacious and not electrical.
If someone is both not electrical and not popular, then he is humorous.
If there is someone who is logical, then Bryant is not vivacious and Garrick is electrical. | Bryant is humorous. | neutral |
Garrick is not vivacious.
Joshua is logical.
Bryant is not electrical.
Garrick is not humorous.
Bryant is popular.
Olin is not popular.
Garrick is informal.
Eunice is informal.
Bryant is not logical.
Eunice is not popular.
Nathalie is electrical.
Olin is not humorous.if there is at least one people who is not logical and not informal, then Olin is not humorous and Nathalie is not electrical.
If there is someone who is both not informal and electrical, then Shelley is logical.
Someone who is eithor not logical or electrical is always not vivacious.
If someone is not vivacious or not electrical, then he is logical.
Bryant is vivacious and Joshua is electrical if and only if Olin is not informal and Nathalie is popular.
If all people are not logical or humorous, then Eunice is not popular.
Someone who is not popular is always not logical.
If someone is both not humorous and informal, then he is popular.
If there is someone who is not electrical, then Eunice is vivacious and Olin is informal.
If someone is informal, then he is both vivacious and not electrical.
If someone is both not electrical and not popular, then he is humorous.
If there is someone who is logical, then Bryant is not vivacious and Garrick is electrical. | Nathalie is not humorous. | neutral |
Garrick is not vivacious.
Joshua is logical.
Bryant is not electrical.
Garrick is not humorous.
Bryant is popular.
Olin is not popular.
Garrick is informal.
Eunice is informal.
Bryant is not logical.
Eunice is not popular.
Nathalie is electrical.
Olin is not humorous.if there is at least one people who is not logical and not informal, then Olin is not humorous and Nathalie is not electrical.
If there is someone who is both not informal and electrical, then Shelley is logical.
Someone who is eithor not logical or electrical is always not vivacious.
If someone is not vivacious or not electrical, then he is logical.
Bryant is vivacious and Joshua is electrical if and only if Olin is not informal and Nathalie is popular.
If all people are not logical or humorous, then Eunice is not popular.
Someone who is not popular is always not logical.
If someone is both not humorous and informal, then he is popular.
If there is someone who is not electrical, then Eunice is vivacious and Olin is informal.
If someone is informal, then he is both vivacious and not electrical.
If someone is both not electrical and not popular, then he is humorous.
If there is someone who is logical, then Bryant is not vivacious and Garrick is electrical. | Olin is not electrical. | entailment |
Garrick is not vivacious.
Joshua is logical.
Bryant is not electrical.
Garrick is not humorous.
Bryant is popular.
Olin is not popular.
Garrick is informal.
Eunice is informal.
Bryant is not logical.
Eunice is not popular.
Nathalie is electrical.
Olin is not humorous.if there is at least one people who is not logical and not informal, then Olin is not humorous and Nathalie is not electrical.
If there is someone who is both not informal and electrical, then Shelley is logical.
Someone who is eithor not logical or electrical is always not vivacious.
If someone is not vivacious or not electrical, then he is logical.
Bryant is vivacious and Joshua is electrical if and only if Olin is not informal and Nathalie is popular.
If all people are not logical or humorous, then Eunice is not popular.
Someone who is not popular is always not logical.
If someone is both not humorous and informal, then he is popular.
If there is someone who is not electrical, then Eunice is vivacious and Olin is informal.
If someone is informal, then he is both vivacious and not electrical.
If someone is both not electrical and not popular, then he is humorous.
If there is someone who is logical, then Bryant is not vivacious and Garrick is electrical. | Olin is popular. | self_contradiction |
Garrick is not vivacious.
Joshua is logical.
Bryant is not electrical.
Garrick is not humorous.
Bryant is popular.
Olin is not popular.
Garrick is informal.
Eunice is informal.
Bryant is not logical.
Eunice is not popular.
Nathalie is electrical.
Olin is not humorous.if there is at least one people who is not logical and not informal, then Olin is not humorous and Nathalie is not electrical.
If there is someone who is both not informal and electrical, then Shelley is logical.
Someone who is eithor not logical or electrical is always not vivacious.
If someone is not vivacious or not electrical, then he is logical.
Bryant is vivacious and Joshua is electrical if and only if Olin is not informal and Nathalie is popular.
If all people are not logical or humorous, then Eunice is not popular.
Someone who is not popular is always not logical.
If someone is both not humorous and informal, then he is popular.
If there is someone who is not electrical, then Eunice is vivacious and Olin is informal.
If someone is informal, then he is both vivacious and not electrical.
If someone is both not electrical and not popular, then he is humorous.
If there is someone who is logical, then Bryant is not vivacious and Garrick is electrical. | Nathalie is logical. | entailment |
Garrick is not vivacious.
Joshua is logical.
Bryant is not electrical.
Garrick is not humorous.
Bryant is popular.
Olin is not popular.
Garrick is informal.
Eunice is informal.
Bryant is not logical.
Eunice is not popular.
Nathalie is electrical.
Olin is not humorous.if there is at least one people who is not logical and not informal, then Olin is not humorous and Nathalie is not electrical.
If there is someone who is both not informal and electrical, then Shelley is logical.
Someone who is eithor not logical or electrical is always not vivacious.
If someone is not vivacious or not electrical, then he is logical.
Bryant is vivacious and Joshua is electrical if and only if Olin is not informal and Nathalie is popular.
If all people are not logical or humorous, then Eunice is not popular.
Someone who is not popular is always not logical.
If someone is both not humorous and informal, then he is popular.
If there is someone who is not electrical, then Eunice is vivacious and Olin is informal.
If someone is informal, then he is both vivacious and not electrical.
If someone is both not electrical and not popular, then he is humorous.
If there is someone who is logical, then Bryant is not vivacious and Garrick is electrical. | Nathalie is vivacious. | contradiction |
Garrick is not vivacious.
Joshua is logical.
Bryant is not electrical.
Garrick is not humorous.
Bryant is popular.
Olin is not popular.
Garrick is informal.
Eunice is informal.
Bryant is not logical.
Eunice is not popular.
Nathalie is electrical.
Olin is not humorous.if there is at least one people who is not logical and not informal, then Olin is not humorous and Nathalie is not electrical.
If there is someone who is both not informal and electrical, then Shelley is logical.
Someone who is eithor not logical or electrical is always not vivacious.
If someone is not vivacious or not electrical, then he is logical.
Bryant is vivacious and Joshua is electrical if and only if Olin is not informal and Nathalie is popular.
If all people are not logical or humorous, then Eunice is not popular.
Someone who is not popular is always not logical.
If someone is both not humorous and informal, then he is popular.
If there is someone who is not electrical, then Eunice is vivacious and Olin is informal.
If someone is informal, then he is both vivacious and not electrical.
If someone is both not electrical and not popular, then he is humorous.
If there is someone who is logical, then Bryant is not vivacious and Garrick is electrical. | Joshua is humorous. | neutral |
Garrick is not vivacious.
Joshua is logical.
Bryant is not electrical.
Garrick is not humorous.
Bryant is popular.
Olin is not popular.
Garrick is informal.
Eunice is informal.
Bryant is not logical.
Eunice is not popular.
Nathalie is electrical.
Olin is not humorous.if there is at least one people who is not logical and not informal, then Olin is not humorous and Nathalie is not electrical.
If there is someone who is both not informal and electrical, then Shelley is logical.
Someone who is eithor not logical or electrical is always not vivacious.
If someone is not vivacious or not electrical, then he is logical.
Bryant is vivacious and Joshua is electrical if and only if Olin is not informal and Nathalie is popular.
If all people are not logical or humorous, then Eunice is not popular.
Someone who is not popular is always not logical.
If someone is both not humorous and informal, then he is popular.
If there is someone who is not electrical, then Eunice is vivacious and Olin is informal.
If someone is informal, then he is both vivacious and not electrical.
If someone is both not electrical and not popular, then he is humorous.
If there is someone who is logical, then Bryant is not vivacious and Garrick is electrical. | Garrick is not logical. | contradiction |
Garrick is not vivacious.
Joshua is logical.
Bryant is not electrical.
Garrick is not humorous.
Bryant is popular.
Olin is not popular.
Garrick is informal.
Eunice is informal.
Bryant is not logical.
Eunice is not popular.
Nathalie is electrical.
Olin is not humorous.if there is at least one people who is not logical and not informal, then Olin is not humorous and Nathalie is not electrical.
If there is someone who is both not informal and electrical, then Shelley is logical.
Someone who is eithor not logical or electrical is always not vivacious.
If someone is not vivacious or not electrical, then he is logical.
Bryant is vivacious and Joshua is electrical if and only if Olin is not informal and Nathalie is popular.
If all people are not logical or humorous, then Eunice is not popular.
Someone who is not popular is always not logical.
If someone is both not humorous and informal, then he is popular.
If there is someone who is not electrical, then Eunice is vivacious and Olin is informal.
If someone is informal, then he is both vivacious and not electrical.
If someone is both not electrical and not popular, then he is humorous.
If there is someone who is logical, then Bryant is not vivacious and Garrick is electrical. | Olin is not humorous. | self_contradiction |
Kilian is silly.
Culbert is not impossible.
Culbert is not busy.
Kerry is tired.
Shawn is not difficult.
Shawn is not busy.
Melody is not sensible.
Sophie is not sensible.
Kilian is busy.
Culbert is not silly.
Shawn is tired.
Shawn is sensible.If someone who is sensible is also not busy, then he is impossible.
It can be concluded that Culbert is silly once knowing that Kerry is impossible.
It can be concluded that Kerry is not silly and Kingsley is busy once knowing that Kerry is not sensible.
If there is someone who is both tired and difficult, then Kilian is not silly.
As long as someone is not busy, he is sensible and not silly.
Someone who is eithor not busy or not sensible is always tired.
If Melody is sensible, then Kilian is difficult and Shawn is silly, and vice versa.
If everyone is tired, then Melody is silly and Melody is not sensible.
If there is at least one people who is either not tired or difficult, then Kerry is not sensible and Kingsley is not busy.
If there is someone who is either not silly or sensible, then Kingsley is difficult.
Kilian being not difficult or Melody being silly implies that Kerry is impossible.
If someone is tired, then he is not sensible. | Kerry is not tired. | contradiction |
Kilian is silly.
Culbert is not impossible.
Culbert is not busy.
Kerry is tired.
Shawn is not difficult.
Shawn is not busy.
Melody is not sensible.
Sophie is not sensible.
Kilian is busy.
Culbert is not silly.
Shawn is tired.
Shawn is sensible.If someone who is sensible is also not busy, then he is impossible.
It can be concluded that Culbert is silly once knowing that Kerry is impossible.
It can be concluded that Kerry is not silly and Kingsley is busy once knowing that Kerry is not sensible.
If there is someone who is both tired and difficult, then Kilian is not silly.
As long as someone is not busy, he is sensible and not silly.
Someone who is eithor not busy or not sensible is always tired.
If Melody is sensible, then Kilian is difficult and Shawn is silly, and vice versa.
If everyone is tired, then Melody is silly and Melody is not sensible.
If there is at least one people who is either not tired or difficult, then Kerry is not sensible and Kingsley is not busy.
If there is someone who is either not silly or sensible, then Kingsley is difficult.
Kilian being not difficult or Melody being silly implies that Kerry is impossible.
If someone is tired, then he is not sensible. | Shawn is not busy. | entailment |
Kilian is silly.
Culbert is not impossible.
Culbert is not busy.
Kerry is tired.
Shawn is not difficult.
Shawn is not busy.
Melody is not sensible.
Sophie is not sensible.
Kilian is busy.
Culbert is not silly.
Shawn is tired.
Shawn is sensible.If someone who is sensible is also not busy, then he is impossible.
It can be concluded that Culbert is silly once knowing that Kerry is impossible.
It can be concluded that Kerry is not silly and Kingsley is busy once knowing that Kerry is not sensible.
If there is someone who is both tired and difficult, then Kilian is not silly.
As long as someone is not busy, he is sensible and not silly.
Someone who is eithor not busy or not sensible is always tired.
If Melody is sensible, then Kilian is difficult and Shawn is silly, and vice versa.
If everyone is tired, then Melody is silly and Melody is not sensible.
If there is at least one people who is either not tired or difficult, then Kerry is not sensible and Kingsley is not busy.
If there is someone who is either not silly or sensible, then Kingsley is difficult.
Kilian being not difficult or Melody being silly implies that Kerry is impossible.
If someone is tired, then he is not sensible. | Kilian is not tired. | neutral |
Kilian is silly.
Culbert is not impossible.
Culbert is not busy.
Kerry is tired.
Shawn is not difficult.
Shawn is not busy.
Melody is not sensible.
Sophie is not sensible.
Kilian is busy.
Culbert is not silly.
Shawn is tired.
Shawn is sensible.If someone who is sensible is also not busy, then he is impossible.
It can be concluded that Culbert is silly once knowing that Kerry is impossible.
It can be concluded that Kerry is not silly and Kingsley is busy once knowing that Kerry is not sensible.
If there is someone who is both tired and difficult, then Kilian is not silly.
As long as someone is not busy, he is sensible and not silly.
Someone who is eithor not busy or not sensible is always tired.
If Melody is sensible, then Kilian is difficult and Shawn is silly, and vice versa.
If everyone is tired, then Melody is silly and Melody is not sensible.
If there is at least one people who is either not tired or difficult, then Kerry is not sensible and Kingsley is not busy.
If there is someone who is either not silly or sensible, then Kingsley is difficult.
Kilian being not difficult or Melody being silly implies that Kerry is impossible.
If someone is tired, then he is not sensible. | Sophie is sensible. | contradiction |
Kilian is silly.
Culbert is not impossible.
Culbert is not busy.
Kerry is tired.
Shawn is not difficult.
Shawn is not busy.
Melody is not sensible.
Sophie is not sensible.
Kilian is busy.
Culbert is not silly.
Shawn is tired.
Shawn is sensible.If someone who is sensible is also not busy, then he is impossible.
It can be concluded that Culbert is silly once knowing that Kerry is impossible.
It can be concluded that Kerry is not silly and Kingsley is busy once knowing that Kerry is not sensible.
If there is someone who is both tired and difficult, then Kilian is not silly.
As long as someone is not busy, he is sensible and not silly.
Someone who is eithor not busy or not sensible is always tired.
If Melody is sensible, then Kilian is difficult and Shawn is silly, and vice versa.
If everyone is tired, then Melody is silly and Melody is not sensible.
If there is at least one people who is either not tired or difficult, then Kerry is not sensible and Kingsley is not busy.
If there is someone who is either not silly or sensible, then Kingsley is difficult.
Kilian being not difficult or Melody being silly implies that Kerry is impossible.
If someone is tired, then he is not sensible. | Shawn is impossible. | entailment |
Kilian is silly.
Culbert is not impossible.
Culbert is not busy.
Kerry is tired.
Shawn is not difficult.
Shawn is not busy.
Melody is not sensible.
Sophie is not sensible.
Kilian is busy.
Culbert is not silly.
Shawn is tired.
Shawn is sensible.If someone who is sensible is also not busy, then he is impossible.
It can be concluded that Culbert is silly once knowing that Kerry is impossible.
It can be concluded that Kerry is not silly and Kingsley is busy once knowing that Kerry is not sensible.
If there is someone who is both tired and difficult, then Kilian is not silly.
As long as someone is not busy, he is sensible and not silly.
Someone who is eithor not busy or not sensible is always tired.
If Melody is sensible, then Kilian is difficult and Shawn is silly, and vice versa.
If everyone is tired, then Melody is silly and Melody is not sensible.
If there is at least one people who is either not tired or difficult, then Kerry is not sensible and Kingsley is not busy.
If there is someone who is either not silly or sensible, then Kingsley is difficult.
Kilian being not difficult or Melody being silly implies that Kerry is impossible.
If someone is tired, then he is not sensible. | Melody is not tired. | contradiction |
Kilian is silly.
Culbert is not impossible.
Culbert is not busy.
Kerry is tired.
Shawn is not difficult.
Shawn is not busy.
Melody is not sensible.
Sophie is not sensible.
Kilian is busy.
Culbert is not silly.
Shawn is tired.
Shawn is sensible.If someone who is sensible is also not busy, then he is impossible.
It can be concluded that Culbert is silly once knowing that Kerry is impossible.
It can be concluded that Kerry is not silly and Kingsley is busy once knowing that Kerry is not sensible.
If there is someone who is both tired and difficult, then Kilian is not silly.
As long as someone is not busy, he is sensible and not silly.
Someone who is eithor not busy or not sensible is always tired.
If Melody is sensible, then Kilian is difficult and Shawn is silly, and vice versa.
If everyone is tired, then Melody is silly and Melody is not sensible.
If there is at least one people who is either not tired or difficult, then Kerry is not sensible and Kingsley is not busy.
If there is someone who is either not silly or sensible, then Kingsley is difficult.
Kilian being not difficult or Melody being silly implies that Kerry is impossible.
If someone is tired, then he is not sensible. | Melody is not busy. | neutral |
Kilian is silly.
Culbert is not impossible.
Culbert is not busy.
Kerry is tired.
Shawn is not difficult.
Shawn is not busy.
Melody is not sensible.
Sophie is not sensible.
Kilian is busy.
Culbert is not silly.
Shawn is tired.
Shawn is sensible.If someone who is sensible is also not busy, then he is impossible.
It can be concluded that Culbert is silly once knowing that Kerry is impossible.
It can be concluded that Kerry is not silly and Kingsley is busy once knowing that Kerry is not sensible.
If there is someone who is both tired and difficult, then Kilian is not silly.
As long as someone is not busy, he is sensible and not silly.
Someone who is eithor not busy or not sensible is always tired.
If Melody is sensible, then Kilian is difficult and Shawn is silly, and vice versa.
If everyone is tired, then Melody is silly and Melody is not sensible.
If there is at least one people who is either not tired or difficult, then Kerry is not sensible and Kingsley is not busy.
If there is someone who is either not silly or sensible, then Kingsley is difficult.
Kilian being not difficult or Melody being silly implies that Kerry is impossible.
If someone is tired, then he is not sensible. | Sophie is not impossible. | neutral |
Kilian is silly.
Culbert is not impossible.
Culbert is not busy.
Kerry is tired.
Shawn is not difficult.
Shawn is not busy.
Melody is not sensible.
Sophie is not sensible.
Kilian is busy.
Culbert is not silly.
Shawn is tired.
Shawn is sensible.If someone who is sensible is also not busy, then he is impossible.
It can be concluded that Culbert is silly once knowing that Kerry is impossible.
It can be concluded that Kerry is not silly and Kingsley is busy once knowing that Kerry is not sensible.
If there is someone who is both tired and difficult, then Kilian is not silly.
As long as someone is not busy, he is sensible and not silly.
Someone who is eithor not busy or not sensible is always tired.
If Melody is sensible, then Kilian is difficult and Shawn is silly, and vice versa.
If everyone is tired, then Melody is silly and Melody is not sensible.
If there is at least one people who is either not tired or difficult, then Kerry is not sensible and Kingsley is not busy.
If there is someone who is either not silly or sensible, then Kingsley is difficult.
Kilian being not difficult or Melody being silly implies that Kerry is impossible.
If someone is tired, then he is not sensible. | Kerry is not sensible. | entailment |
Kilian is silly.
Culbert is not impossible.
Culbert is not busy.
Kerry is tired.
Shawn is not difficult.
Shawn is not busy.
Melody is not sensible.
Sophie is not sensible.
Kilian is busy.
Culbert is not silly.
Shawn is tired.
Shawn is sensible.If someone who is sensible is also not busy, then he is impossible.
It can be concluded that Culbert is silly once knowing that Kerry is impossible.
It can be concluded that Kerry is not silly and Kingsley is busy once knowing that Kerry is not sensible.
If there is someone who is both tired and difficult, then Kilian is not silly.
As long as someone is not busy, he is sensible and not silly.
Someone who is eithor not busy or not sensible is always tired.
If Melody is sensible, then Kilian is difficult and Shawn is silly, and vice versa.
If everyone is tired, then Melody is silly and Melody is not sensible.
If there is at least one people who is either not tired or difficult, then Kerry is not sensible and Kingsley is not busy.
If there is someone who is either not silly or sensible, then Kingsley is difficult.
Kilian being not difficult or Melody being silly implies that Kerry is impossible.
If someone is tired, then he is not sensible. | Culbert is not impossible. | self_contradiction |
Kilian is silly.
Culbert is not impossible.
Culbert is not busy.
Kerry is tired.
Shawn is not difficult.
Shawn is not busy.
Melody is not sensible.
Sophie is not sensible.
Kilian is busy.
Culbert is not silly.
Shawn is tired.
Shawn is sensible.If someone who is sensible is also not busy, then he is impossible.
It can be concluded that Culbert is silly once knowing that Kerry is impossible.
It can be concluded that Kerry is not silly and Kingsley is busy once knowing that Kerry is not sensible.
If there is someone who is both tired and difficult, then Kilian is not silly.
As long as someone is not busy, he is sensible and not silly.
Someone who is eithor not busy or not sensible is always tired.
If Melody is sensible, then Kilian is difficult and Shawn is silly, and vice versa.
If everyone is tired, then Melody is silly and Melody is not sensible.
If there is at least one people who is either not tired or difficult, then Kerry is not sensible and Kingsley is not busy.
If there is someone who is either not silly or sensible, then Kingsley is difficult.
Kilian being not difficult or Melody being silly implies that Kerry is impossible.
If someone is tired, then he is not sensible. | Kerry is impossible. | neutral |
Kilian is silly.
Culbert is not impossible.
Culbert is not busy.
Kerry is tired.
Shawn is not difficult.
Shawn is not busy.
Melody is not sensible.
Sophie is not sensible.
Kilian is busy.
Culbert is not silly.
Shawn is tired.
Shawn is sensible.If someone who is sensible is also not busy, then he is impossible.
It can be concluded that Culbert is silly once knowing that Kerry is impossible.
It can be concluded that Kerry is not silly and Kingsley is busy once knowing that Kerry is not sensible.
If there is someone who is both tired and difficult, then Kilian is not silly.
As long as someone is not busy, he is sensible and not silly.
Someone who is eithor not busy or not sensible is always tired.
If Melody is sensible, then Kilian is difficult and Shawn is silly, and vice versa.
If everyone is tired, then Melody is silly and Melody is not sensible.
If there is at least one people who is either not tired or difficult, then Kerry is not sensible and Kingsley is not busy.
If there is someone who is either not silly or sensible, then Kingsley is difficult.
Kilian being not difficult or Melody being silly implies that Kerry is impossible.
If someone is tired, then he is not sensible. | Culbert is not sensible. | self_contradiction |
Kilian is silly.
Culbert is not impossible.
Culbert is not busy.
Kerry is tired.
Shawn is not difficult.
Shawn is not busy.
Melody is not sensible.
Sophie is not sensible.
Kilian is busy.
Culbert is not silly.
Shawn is tired.
Shawn is sensible.If someone who is sensible is also not busy, then he is impossible.
It can be concluded that Culbert is silly once knowing that Kerry is impossible.
It can be concluded that Kerry is not silly and Kingsley is busy once knowing that Kerry is not sensible.
If there is someone who is both tired and difficult, then Kilian is not silly.
As long as someone is not busy, he is sensible and not silly.
Someone who is eithor not busy or not sensible is always tired.
If Melody is sensible, then Kilian is difficult and Shawn is silly, and vice versa.
If everyone is tired, then Melody is silly and Melody is not sensible.
If there is at least one people who is either not tired or difficult, then Kerry is not sensible and Kingsley is not busy.
If there is someone who is either not silly or sensible, then Kingsley is difficult.
Kilian being not difficult or Melody being silly implies that Kerry is impossible.
If someone is tired, then he is not sensible. | Sophie is not tired. | contradiction |
Kilian is silly.
Culbert is not impossible.
Culbert is not busy.
Kerry is tired.
Shawn is not difficult.
Shawn is not busy.
Melody is not sensible.
Sophie is not sensible.
Kilian is busy.
Culbert is not silly.
Shawn is tired.
Shawn is sensible.If someone who is sensible is also not busy, then he is impossible.
It can be concluded that Culbert is silly once knowing that Kerry is impossible.
It can be concluded that Kerry is not silly and Kingsley is busy once knowing that Kerry is not sensible.
If there is someone who is both tired and difficult, then Kilian is not silly.
As long as someone is not busy, he is sensible and not silly.
Someone who is eithor not busy or not sensible is always tired.
If Melody is sensible, then Kilian is difficult and Shawn is silly, and vice versa.
If everyone is tired, then Melody is silly and Melody is not sensible.
If there is at least one people who is either not tired or difficult, then Kerry is not sensible and Kingsley is not busy.
If there is someone who is either not silly or sensible, then Kingsley is difficult.
Kilian being not difficult or Melody being silly implies that Kerry is impossible.
If someone is tired, then he is not sensible. | Kilian is not sensible. | neutral |
Kilian is silly.
Culbert is not impossible.
Culbert is not busy.
Kerry is tired.
Shawn is not difficult.
Shawn is not busy.
Melody is not sensible.
Sophie is not sensible.
Kilian is busy.
Culbert is not silly.
Shawn is tired.
Shawn is sensible.If someone who is sensible is also not busy, then he is impossible.
It can be concluded that Culbert is silly once knowing that Kerry is impossible.
It can be concluded that Kerry is not silly and Kingsley is busy once knowing that Kerry is not sensible.
If there is someone who is both tired and difficult, then Kilian is not silly.
As long as someone is not busy, he is sensible and not silly.
Someone who is eithor not busy or not sensible is always tired.
If Melody is sensible, then Kilian is difficult and Shawn is silly, and vice versa.
If everyone is tired, then Melody is silly and Melody is not sensible.
If there is at least one people who is either not tired or difficult, then Kerry is not sensible and Kingsley is not busy.
If there is someone who is either not silly or sensible, then Kingsley is difficult.
Kilian being not difficult or Melody being silly implies that Kerry is impossible.
If someone is tired, then he is not sensible. | Kingsley is busy. | self_contradiction |
Kilian is silly.
Culbert is not impossible.
Culbert is not busy.
Kerry is tired.
Shawn is not difficult.
Shawn is not busy.
Melody is not sensible.
Sophie is not sensible.
Kilian is busy.
Culbert is not silly.
Shawn is tired.
Shawn is sensible.If someone who is sensible is also not busy, then he is impossible.
It can be concluded that Culbert is silly once knowing that Kerry is impossible.
It can be concluded that Kerry is not silly and Kingsley is busy once knowing that Kerry is not sensible.
If there is someone who is both tired and difficult, then Kilian is not silly.
As long as someone is not busy, he is sensible and not silly.
Someone who is eithor not busy or not sensible is always tired.
If Melody is sensible, then Kilian is difficult and Shawn is silly, and vice versa.
If everyone is tired, then Melody is silly and Melody is not sensible.
If there is at least one people who is either not tired or difficult, then Kerry is not sensible and Kingsley is not busy.
If there is someone who is either not silly or sensible, then Kingsley is difficult.
Kilian being not difficult or Melody being silly implies that Kerry is impossible.
If someone is tired, then he is not sensible. | Kilian is silly. | self_contradiction |
Kilian is silly.
Culbert is not impossible.
Culbert is not busy.
Kerry is tired.
Shawn is not difficult.
Shawn is not busy.
Melody is not sensible.
Sophie is not sensible.
Kilian is busy.
Culbert is not silly.
Shawn is tired.
Shawn is sensible.If someone who is sensible is also not busy, then he is impossible.
It can be concluded that Culbert is silly once knowing that Kerry is impossible.
It can be concluded that Kerry is not silly and Kingsley is busy once knowing that Kerry is not sensible.
If there is someone who is both tired and difficult, then Kilian is not silly.
As long as someone is not busy, he is sensible and not silly.
Someone who is eithor not busy or not sensible is always tired.
If Melody is sensible, then Kilian is difficult and Shawn is silly, and vice versa.
If everyone is tired, then Melody is silly and Melody is not sensible.
If there is at least one people who is either not tired or difficult, then Kerry is not sensible and Kingsley is not busy.
If there is someone who is either not silly or sensible, then Kingsley is difficult.
Kilian being not difficult or Melody being silly implies that Kerry is impossible.
If someone is tired, then he is not sensible. | Kingsley is tired. | entailment |
Kilian is silly.
Culbert is not impossible.
Culbert is not busy.
Kerry is tired.
Shawn is not difficult.
Shawn is not busy.
Melody is not sensible.
Sophie is not sensible.
Kilian is busy.
Culbert is not silly.
Shawn is tired.
Shawn is sensible.If someone who is sensible is also not busy, then he is impossible.
It can be concluded that Culbert is silly once knowing that Kerry is impossible.
It can be concluded that Kerry is not silly and Kingsley is busy once knowing that Kerry is not sensible.
If there is someone who is both tired and difficult, then Kilian is not silly.
As long as someone is not busy, he is sensible and not silly.
Someone who is eithor not busy or not sensible is always tired.
If Melody is sensible, then Kilian is difficult and Shawn is silly, and vice versa.
If everyone is tired, then Melody is silly and Melody is not sensible.
If there is at least one people who is either not tired or difficult, then Kerry is not sensible and Kingsley is not busy.
If there is someone who is either not silly or sensible, then Kingsley is difficult.
Kilian being not difficult or Melody being silly implies that Kerry is impossible.
If someone is tired, then he is not sensible. | Shawn is difficult. | contradiction |
Kilian is silly.
Culbert is not impossible.
Culbert is not busy.
Kerry is tired.
Shawn is not difficult.
Shawn is not busy.
Melody is not sensible.
Sophie is not sensible.
Kilian is busy.
Culbert is not silly.
Shawn is tired.
Shawn is sensible.If someone who is sensible is also not busy, then he is impossible.
It can be concluded that Culbert is silly once knowing that Kerry is impossible.
It can be concluded that Kerry is not silly and Kingsley is busy once knowing that Kerry is not sensible.
If there is someone who is both tired and difficult, then Kilian is not silly.
As long as someone is not busy, he is sensible and not silly.
Someone who is eithor not busy or not sensible is always tired.
If Melody is sensible, then Kilian is difficult and Shawn is silly, and vice versa.
If everyone is tired, then Melody is silly and Melody is not sensible.
If there is at least one people who is either not tired or difficult, then Kerry is not sensible and Kingsley is not busy.
If there is someone who is either not silly or sensible, then Kingsley is difficult.
Kilian being not difficult or Melody being silly implies that Kerry is impossible.
If someone is tired, then he is not sensible. | Shawn is not difficult. | entailment |
Kilian is silly.
Culbert is not impossible.
Culbert is not busy.
Kerry is tired.
Shawn is not difficult.
Shawn is not busy.
Melody is not sensible.
Sophie is not sensible.
Kilian is busy.
Culbert is not silly.
Shawn is tired.
Shawn is sensible.If someone who is sensible is also not busy, then he is impossible.
It can be concluded that Culbert is silly once knowing that Kerry is impossible.
It can be concluded that Kerry is not silly and Kingsley is busy once knowing that Kerry is not sensible.
If there is someone who is both tired and difficult, then Kilian is not silly.
As long as someone is not busy, he is sensible and not silly.
Someone who is eithor not busy or not sensible is always tired.
If Melody is sensible, then Kilian is difficult and Shawn is silly, and vice versa.
If everyone is tired, then Melody is silly and Melody is not sensible.
If there is at least one people who is either not tired or difficult, then Kerry is not sensible and Kingsley is not busy.
If there is someone who is either not silly or sensible, then Kingsley is difficult.
Kilian being not difficult or Melody being silly implies that Kerry is impossible.
If someone is tired, then he is not sensible. | Kingsley is not busy. | self_contradiction |
Theodore is not exuberant.
Morris is not wild.
Phineas is not blue.
Phineas is not wild.
Fred is not nice.
Morris is nice.
James is not nice.
Theodore is nice.
Chester is bloody.
Fred is not wild.
Fred is not desperate.
James is not bloody.As long as someone is blue, he is nice and not desperate.
If there is at least one people who is bloody or exuberant, then Phineas is desperate.
Trent being desperate or Morris being wild implies that Morris is not blue.
If there is at least one people who is both not wild and not bloody, then Morris is not desperate.
If there is someone who is both exuberant and blue, then Chester is not bloody.
Someone being both wild and not exuberant is equivalent to being blue.
If someone is nice, then he is not desperate, and vice versa.
Someone who is not nice is always both not bloody and exuberant.
If there is at least one people who is bloody, then Phineas is not blue and Phineas is desperate.
If someone is desperate, then he is nice, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either not blue or not exuberant, he is wild and not bloody.
If there is someone who is not blue, then James is not wild and Fred is exuberant. | Theodore is desperate. | self_contradiction |
Theodore is not exuberant.
Morris is not wild.
Phineas is not blue.
Phineas is not wild.
Fred is not nice.
Morris is nice.
James is not nice.
Theodore is nice.
Chester is bloody.
Fred is not wild.
Fred is not desperate.
James is not bloody.As long as someone is blue, he is nice and not desperate.
If there is at least one people who is bloody or exuberant, then Phineas is desperate.
Trent being desperate or Morris being wild implies that Morris is not blue.
If there is at least one people who is both not wild and not bloody, then Morris is not desperate.
If there is someone who is both exuberant and blue, then Chester is not bloody.
Someone being both wild and not exuberant is equivalent to being blue.
If someone is nice, then he is not desperate, and vice versa.
Someone who is not nice is always both not bloody and exuberant.
If there is at least one people who is bloody, then Phineas is not blue and Phineas is desperate.
If someone is desperate, then he is nice, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either not blue or not exuberant, he is wild and not bloody.
If there is someone who is not blue, then James is not wild and Fred is exuberant. | Theodore is blue. | entailment |
Theodore is not exuberant.
Morris is not wild.
Phineas is not blue.
Phineas is not wild.
Fred is not nice.
Morris is nice.
James is not nice.
Theodore is nice.
Chester is bloody.
Fred is not wild.
Fred is not desperate.
James is not bloody.As long as someone is blue, he is nice and not desperate.
If there is at least one people who is bloody or exuberant, then Phineas is desperate.
Trent being desperate or Morris being wild implies that Morris is not blue.
If there is at least one people who is both not wild and not bloody, then Morris is not desperate.
If there is someone who is both exuberant and blue, then Chester is not bloody.
Someone being both wild and not exuberant is equivalent to being blue.
If someone is nice, then he is not desperate, and vice versa.
Someone who is not nice is always both not bloody and exuberant.
If there is at least one people who is bloody, then Phineas is not blue and Phineas is desperate.
If someone is desperate, then he is nice, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either not blue or not exuberant, he is wild and not bloody.
If there is someone who is not blue, then James is not wild and Fred is exuberant. | Morris is not blue. | neutral |
Theodore is not exuberant.
Morris is not wild.
Phineas is not blue.
Phineas is not wild.
Fred is not nice.
Morris is nice.
James is not nice.
Theodore is nice.
Chester is bloody.
Fred is not wild.
Fred is not desperate.
James is not bloody.As long as someone is blue, he is nice and not desperate.
If there is at least one people who is bloody or exuberant, then Phineas is desperate.
Trent being desperate or Morris being wild implies that Morris is not blue.
If there is at least one people who is both not wild and not bloody, then Morris is not desperate.
If there is someone who is both exuberant and blue, then Chester is not bloody.
Someone being both wild and not exuberant is equivalent to being blue.
If someone is nice, then he is not desperate, and vice versa.
Someone who is not nice is always both not bloody and exuberant.
If there is at least one people who is bloody, then Phineas is not blue and Phineas is desperate.
If someone is desperate, then he is nice, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either not blue or not exuberant, he is wild and not bloody.
If there is someone who is not blue, then James is not wild and Fred is exuberant. | Morris is nice. | entailment |
Theodore is not exuberant.
Morris is not wild.
Phineas is not blue.
Phineas is not wild.
Fred is not nice.
Morris is nice.
James is not nice.
Theodore is nice.
Chester is bloody.
Fred is not wild.
Fred is not desperate.
James is not bloody.As long as someone is blue, he is nice and not desperate.
If there is at least one people who is bloody or exuberant, then Phineas is desperate.
Trent being desperate or Morris being wild implies that Morris is not blue.
If there is at least one people who is both not wild and not bloody, then Morris is not desperate.
If there is someone who is both exuberant and blue, then Chester is not bloody.
Someone being both wild and not exuberant is equivalent to being blue.
If someone is nice, then he is not desperate, and vice versa.
Someone who is not nice is always both not bloody and exuberant.
If there is at least one people who is bloody, then Phineas is not blue and Phineas is desperate.
If someone is desperate, then he is nice, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either not blue or not exuberant, he is wild and not bloody.
If there is someone who is not blue, then James is not wild and Fred is exuberant. | Fred is bloody. | contradiction |
Theodore is not exuberant.
Morris is not wild.
Phineas is not blue.
Phineas is not wild.
Fred is not nice.
Morris is nice.
James is not nice.
Theodore is nice.
Chester is bloody.
Fred is not wild.
Fred is not desperate.
James is not bloody.As long as someone is blue, he is nice and not desperate.
If there is at least one people who is bloody or exuberant, then Phineas is desperate.
Trent being desperate or Morris being wild implies that Morris is not blue.
If there is at least one people who is both not wild and not bloody, then Morris is not desperate.
If there is someone who is both exuberant and blue, then Chester is not bloody.
Someone being both wild and not exuberant is equivalent to being blue.
If someone is nice, then he is not desperate, and vice versa.
Someone who is not nice is always both not bloody and exuberant.
If there is at least one people who is bloody, then Phineas is not blue and Phineas is desperate.
If someone is desperate, then he is nice, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either not blue or not exuberant, he is wild and not bloody.
If there is someone who is not blue, then James is not wild and Fred is exuberant. | Trent is blue. | neutral |
Theodore is not exuberant.
Morris is not wild.
Phineas is not blue.
Phineas is not wild.
Fred is not nice.
Morris is nice.
James is not nice.
Theodore is nice.
Chester is bloody.
Fred is not wild.
Fred is not desperate.
James is not bloody.As long as someone is blue, he is nice and not desperate.
If there is at least one people who is bloody or exuberant, then Phineas is desperate.
Trent being desperate or Morris being wild implies that Morris is not blue.
If there is at least one people who is both not wild and not bloody, then Morris is not desperate.
If there is someone who is both exuberant and blue, then Chester is not bloody.
Someone being both wild and not exuberant is equivalent to being blue.
If someone is nice, then he is not desperate, and vice versa.
Someone who is not nice is always both not bloody and exuberant.
If there is at least one people who is bloody, then Phineas is not blue and Phineas is desperate.
If someone is desperate, then he is nice, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either not blue or not exuberant, he is wild and not bloody.
If there is someone who is not blue, then James is not wild and Fred is exuberant. | James is nice. | contradiction |
Theodore is not exuberant.
Morris is not wild.
Phineas is not blue.
Phineas is not wild.
Fred is not nice.
Morris is nice.
James is not nice.
Theodore is nice.
Chester is bloody.
Fred is not wild.
Fred is not desperate.
James is not bloody.As long as someone is blue, he is nice and not desperate.
If there is at least one people who is bloody or exuberant, then Phineas is desperate.
Trent being desperate or Morris being wild implies that Morris is not blue.
If there is at least one people who is both not wild and not bloody, then Morris is not desperate.
If there is someone who is both exuberant and blue, then Chester is not bloody.
Someone being both wild and not exuberant is equivalent to being blue.
If someone is nice, then he is not desperate, and vice versa.
Someone who is not nice is always both not bloody and exuberant.
If there is at least one people who is bloody, then Phineas is not blue and Phineas is desperate.
If someone is desperate, then he is nice, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either not blue or not exuberant, he is wild and not bloody.
If there is someone who is not blue, then James is not wild and Fred is exuberant. | Phineas is blue. | contradiction |
Theodore is not exuberant.
Morris is not wild.
Phineas is not blue.
Phineas is not wild.
Fred is not nice.
Morris is nice.
James is not nice.
Theodore is nice.
Chester is bloody.
Fred is not wild.
Fred is not desperate.
James is not bloody.As long as someone is blue, he is nice and not desperate.
If there is at least one people who is bloody or exuberant, then Phineas is desperate.
Trent being desperate or Morris being wild implies that Morris is not blue.
If there is at least one people who is both not wild and not bloody, then Morris is not desperate.
If there is someone who is both exuberant and blue, then Chester is not bloody.
Someone being both wild and not exuberant is equivalent to being blue.
If someone is nice, then he is not desperate, and vice versa.
Someone who is not nice is always both not bloody and exuberant.
If there is at least one people who is bloody, then Phineas is not blue and Phineas is desperate.
If someone is desperate, then he is nice, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either not blue or not exuberant, he is wild and not bloody.
If there is someone who is not blue, then James is not wild and Fred is exuberant. | Morris is blue. | neutral |
Theodore is not exuberant.
Morris is not wild.
Phineas is not blue.
Phineas is not wild.
Fred is not nice.
Morris is nice.
James is not nice.
Theodore is nice.
Chester is bloody.
Fred is not wild.
Fred is not desperate.
James is not bloody.As long as someone is blue, he is nice and not desperate.
If there is at least one people who is bloody or exuberant, then Phineas is desperate.
Trent being desperate or Morris being wild implies that Morris is not blue.
If there is at least one people who is both not wild and not bloody, then Morris is not desperate.
If there is someone who is both exuberant and blue, then Chester is not bloody.
Someone being both wild and not exuberant is equivalent to being blue.
If someone is nice, then he is not desperate, and vice versa.
Someone who is not nice is always both not bloody and exuberant.
If there is at least one people who is bloody, then Phineas is not blue and Phineas is desperate.
If someone is desperate, then he is nice, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either not blue or not exuberant, he is wild and not bloody.
If there is someone who is not blue, then James is not wild and Fred is exuberant. | Theodore is not desperate. | self_contradiction |
Theodore is not exuberant.
Morris is not wild.
Phineas is not blue.
Phineas is not wild.
Fred is not nice.
Morris is nice.
James is not nice.
Theodore is nice.
Chester is bloody.
Fred is not wild.
Fred is not desperate.
James is not bloody.As long as someone is blue, he is nice and not desperate.
If there is at least one people who is bloody or exuberant, then Phineas is desperate.
Trent being desperate or Morris being wild implies that Morris is not blue.
If there is at least one people who is both not wild and not bloody, then Morris is not desperate.
If there is someone who is both exuberant and blue, then Chester is not bloody.
Someone being both wild and not exuberant is equivalent to being blue.
If someone is nice, then he is not desperate, and vice versa.
Someone who is not nice is always both not bloody and exuberant.
If there is at least one people who is bloody, then Phineas is not blue and Phineas is desperate.
If someone is desperate, then he is nice, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either not blue or not exuberant, he is wild and not bloody.
If there is someone who is not blue, then James is not wild and Fred is exuberant. | Theodore is not nice. | contradiction |
Theodore is not exuberant.
Morris is not wild.
Phineas is not blue.
Phineas is not wild.
Fred is not nice.
Morris is nice.
James is not nice.
Theodore is nice.
Chester is bloody.
Fred is not wild.
Fred is not desperate.
James is not bloody.As long as someone is blue, he is nice and not desperate.
If there is at least one people who is bloody or exuberant, then Phineas is desperate.
Trent being desperate or Morris being wild implies that Morris is not blue.
If there is at least one people who is both not wild and not bloody, then Morris is not desperate.
If there is someone who is both exuberant and blue, then Chester is not bloody.
Someone being both wild and not exuberant is equivalent to being blue.
If someone is nice, then he is not desperate, and vice versa.
Someone who is not nice is always both not bloody and exuberant.
If there is at least one people who is bloody, then Phineas is not blue and Phineas is desperate.
If someone is desperate, then he is nice, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either not blue or not exuberant, he is wild and not bloody.
If there is someone who is not blue, then James is not wild and Fred is exuberant. | Morris is not exuberant. | neutral |
Theodore is not exuberant.
Morris is not wild.
Phineas is not blue.
Phineas is not wild.
Fred is not nice.
Morris is nice.
James is not nice.
Theodore is nice.
Chester is bloody.
Fred is not wild.
Fred is not desperate.
James is not bloody.As long as someone is blue, he is nice and not desperate.
If there is at least one people who is bloody or exuberant, then Phineas is desperate.
Trent being desperate or Morris being wild implies that Morris is not blue.
If there is at least one people who is both not wild and not bloody, then Morris is not desperate.
If there is someone who is both exuberant and blue, then Chester is not bloody.
Someone being both wild and not exuberant is equivalent to being blue.
If someone is nice, then he is not desperate, and vice versa.
Someone who is not nice is always both not bloody and exuberant.
If there is at least one people who is bloody, then Phineas is not blue and Phineas is desperate.
If someone is desperate, then he is nice, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either not blue or not exuberant, he is wild and not bloody.
If there is someone who is not blue, then James is not wild and Fred is exuberant. | Fred is desperate. | self_contradiction |
Theodore is not exuberant.
Morris is not wild.
Phineas is not blue.
Phineas is not wild.
Fred is not nice.
Morris is nice.
James is not nice.
Theodore is nice.
Chester is bloody.
Fred is not wild.
Fred is not desperate.
James is not bloody.As long as someone is blue, he is nice and not desperate.
If there is at least one people who is bloody or exuberant, then Phineas is desperate.
Trent being desperate or Morris being wild implies that Morris is not blue.
If there is at least one people who is both not wild and not bloody, then Morris is not desperate.
If there is someone who is both exuberant and blue, then Chester is not bloody.
Someone being both wild and not exuberant is equivalent to being blue.
If someone is nice, then he is not desperate, and vice versa.
Someone who is not nice is always both not bloody and exuberant.
If there is at least one people who is bloody, then Phineas is not blue and Phineas is desperate.
If someone is desperate, then he is nice, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either not blue or not exuberant, he is wild and not bloody.
If there is someone who is not blue, then James is not wild and Fred is exuberant. | Fred is nice. | self_contradiction |
Theodore is not exuberant.
Morris is not wild.
Phineas is not blue.
Phineas is not wild.
Fred is not nice.
Morris is nice.
James is not nice.
Theodore is nice.
Chester is bloody.
Fred is not wild.
Fred is not desperate.
James is not bloody.As long as someone is blue, he is nice and not desperate.
If there is at least one people who is bloody or exuberant, then Phineas is desperate.
Trent being desperate or Morris being wild implies that Morris is not blue.
If there is at least one people who is both not wild and not bloody, then Morris is not desperate.
If there is someone who is both exuberant and blue, then Chester is not bloody.
Someone being both wild and not exuberant is equivalent to being blue.
If someone is nice, then he is not desperate, and vice versa.
Someone who is not nice is always both not bloody and exuberant.
If there is at least one people who is bloody, then Phineas is not blue and Phineas is desperate.
If someone is desperate, then he is nice, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either not blue or not exuberant, he is wild and not bloody.
If there is someone who is not blue, then James is not wild and Fred is exuberant. | Fred is not exuberant. | contradiction |
Theodore is not exuberant.
Morris is not wild.
Phineas is not blue.
Phineas is not wild.
Fred is not nice.
Morris is nice.
James is not nice.
Theodore is nice.
Chester is bloody.
Fred is not wild.
Fred is not desperate.
James is not bloody.As long as someone is blue, he is nice and not desperate.
If there is at least one people who is bloody or exuberant, then Phineas is desperate.
Trent being desperate or Morris being wild implies that Morris is not blue.
If there is at least one people who is both not wild and not bloody, then Morris is not desperate.
If there is someone who is both exuberant and blue, then Chester is not bloody.
Someone being both wild and not exuberant is equivalent to being blue.
If someone is nice, then he is not desperate, and vice versa.
Someone who is not nice is always both not bloody and exuberant.
If there is at least one people who is bloody, then Phineas is not blue and Phineas is desperate.
If someone is desperate, then he is nice, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either not blue or not exuberant, he is wild and not bloody.
If there is someone who is not blue, then James is not wild and Fred is exuberant. | Theodore is not exuberant. | entailment |
Theodore is not exuberant.
Morris is not wild.
Phineas is not blue.
Phineas is not wild.
Fred is not nice.
Morris is nice.
James is not nice.
Theodore is nice.
Chester is bloody.
Fred is not wild.
Fred is not desperate.
James is not bloody.As long as someone is blue, he is nice and not desperate.
If there is at least one people who is bloody or exuberant, then Phineas is desperate.
Trent being desperate or Morris being wild implies that Morris is not blue.
If there is at least one people who is both not wild and not bloody, then Morris is not desperate.
If there is someone who is both exuberant and blue, then Chester is not bloody.
Someone being both wild and not exuberant is equivalent to being blue.
If someone is nice, then he is not desperate, and vice versa.
Someone who is not nice is always both not bloody and exuberant.
If there is at least one people who is bloody, then Phineas is not blue and Phineas is desperate.
If someone is desperate, then he is nice, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either not blue or not exuberant, he is wild and not bloody.
If there is someone who is not blue, then James is not wild and Fred is exuberant. | Fred is blue. | neutral |
Theodore is not exuberant.
Morris is not wild.
Phineas is not blue.
Phineas is not wild.
Fred is not nice.
Morris is nice.
James is not nice.
Theodore is nice.
Chester is bloody.
Fred is not wild.
Fred is not desperate.
James is not bloody.As long as someone is blue, he is nice and not desperate.
If there is at least one people who is bloody or exuberant, then Phineas is desperate.
Trent being desperate or Morris being wild implies that Morris is not blue.
If there is at least one people who is both not wild and not bloody, then Morris is not desperate.
If there is someone who is both exuberant and blue, then Chester is not bloody.
Someone being both wild and not exuberant is equivalent to being blue.
If someone is nice, then he is not desperate, and vice versa.
Someone who is not nice is always both not bloody and exuberant.
If there is at least one people who is bloody, then Phineas is not blue and Phineas is desperate.
If someone is desperate, then he is nice, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either not blue or not exuberant, he is wild and not bloody.
If there is someone who is not blue, then James is not wild and Fred is exuberant. | Chester is bloody. | entailment |
Theodore is not exuberant.
Morris is not wild.
Phineas is not blue.
Phineas is not wild.
Fred is not nice.
Morris is nice.
James is not nice.
Theodore is nice.
Chester is bloody.
Fred is not wild.
Fred is not desperate.
James is not bloody.As long as someone is blue, he is nice and not desperate.
If there is at least one people who is bloody or exuberant, then Phineas is desperate.
Trent being desperate or Morris being wild implies that Morris is not blue.
If there is at least one people who is both not wild and not bloody, then Morris is not desperate.
If there is someone who is both exuberant and blue, then Chester is not bloody.
Someone being both wild and not exuberant is equivalent to being blue.
If someone is nice, then he is not desperate, and vice versa.
Someone who is not nice is always both not bloody and exuberant.
If there is at least one people who is bloody, then Phineas is not blue and Phineas is desperate.
If someone is desperate, then he is nice, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either not blue or not exuberant, he is wild and not bloody.
If there is someone who is not blue, then James is not wild and Fred is exuberant. | Phineas is not bloody. | entailment |
Theodore is not exuberant.
Morris is not wild.
Phineas is not blue.
Phineas is not wild.
Fred is not nice.
Morris is nice.
James is not nice.
Theodore is nice.
Chester is bloody.
Fred is not wild.
Fred is not desperate.
James is not bloody.As long as someone is blue, he is nice and not desperate.
If there is at least one people who is bloody or exuberant, then Phineas is desperate.
Trent being desperate or Morris being wild implies that Morris is not blue.
If there is at least one people who is both not wild and not bloody, then Morris is not desperate.
If there is someone who is both exuberant and blue, then Chester is not bloody.
Someone being both wild and not exuberant is equivalent to being blue.
If someone is nice, then he is not desperate, and vice versa.
Someone who is not nice is always both not bloody and exuberant.
If there is at least one people who is bloody, then Phineas is not blue and Phineas is desperate.
If someone is desperate, then he is nice, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either not blue or not exuberant, he is wild and not bloody.
If there is someone who is not blue, then James is not wild and Fred is exuberant. | Phineas is not wild. | self_contradiction |
Shawn is not happy.
Cuthbert is breakable.
Cedric is not adventurous.
Cedric is not united.
Bowen is united.
Bowen is not adventurous.
Marshall is not breakable.
Cuthbert is not self-confident.
Shawn is not breakable.
Clark is happy.
Clark is self-confident.
Marshall is not self-confident.If there is someone who is happy, then Cuthbert is adventurous and Bowen is united.
Marshall being united is equivalent to Shawn being self-confident and Cedric being breakable.
It can be concluded that Clark is not breakable once knowing that Calvin is disgusted or Clark is not happy.
Someone who is not self-confident or breakable is always not disgusted and happy.
Clark is adventurous if and only if Marshall is disgusted.
If all people are disgusted, then Shawn is not happy.
If someone is not self-confident, then he is not breakable.
Bowen is happy if and only if Cuthbert is not breakable.
Shawn being happy or Cedric being breakable implies that Calvin is not united.
If there is at least one people who is united, then Cedric is not self-confident and Calvin is breakable.
If someone is not adventurous and breakable, then he is not self-confident, and vice versa.
If someone is adventurous, then he is happy, and vice versa. | Marshall is self-confident. | contradiction |
Shawn is not happy.
Cuthbert is breakable.
Cedric is not adventurous.
Cedric is not united.
Bowen is united.
Bowen is not adventurous.
Marshall is not breakable.
Cuthbert is not self-confident.
Shawn is not breakable.
Clark is happy.
Clark is self-confident.
Marshall is not self-confident.If there is someone who is happy, then Cuthbert is adventurous and Bowen is united.
Marshall being united is equivalent to Shawn being self-confident and Cedric being breakable.
It can be concluded that Clark is not breakable once knowing that Calvin is disgusted or Clark is not happy.
Someone who is not self-confident or breakable is always not disgusted and happy.
Clark is adventurous if and only if Marshall is disgusted.
If all people are disgusted, then Shawn is not happy.
If someone is not self-confident, then he is not breakable.
Bowen is happy if and only if Cuthbert is not breakable.
Shawn being happy or Cedric being breakable implies that Calvin is not united.
If there is at least one people who is united, then Cedric is not self-confident and Calvin is breakable.
If someone is not adventurous and breakable, then he is not self-confident, and vice versa.
If someone is adventurous, then he is happy, and vice versa. | Cuthbert is adventurous. | self_contradiction |
Shawn is not happy.
Cuthbert is breakable.
Cedric is not adventurous.
Cedric is not united.
Bowen is united.
Bowen is not adventurous.
Marshall is not breakable.
Cuthbert is not self-confident.
Shawn is not breakable.
Clark is happy.
Clark is self-confident.
Marshall is not self-confident.If there is someone who is happy, then Cuthbert is adventurous and Bowen is united.
Marshall being united is equivalent to Shawn being self-confident and Cedric being breakable.
It can be concluded that Clark is not breakable once knowing that Calvin is disgusted or Clark is not happy.
Someone who is not self-confident or breakable is always not disgusted and happy.
Clark is adventurous if and only if Marshall is disgusted.
If all people are disgusted, then Shawn is not happy.
If someone is not self-confident, then he is not breakable.
Bowen is happy if and only if Cuthbert is not breakable.
Shawn being happy or Cedric being breakable implies that Calvin is not united.
If there is at least one people who is united, then Cedric is not self-confident and Calvin is breakable.
If someone is not adventurous and breakable, then he is not self-confident, and vice versa.
If someone is adventurous, then he is happy, and vice versa. | Cuthbert is not adventurous. | self_contradiction |
Shawn is not happy.
Cuthbert is breakable.
Cedric is not adventurous.
Cedric is not united.
Bowen is united.
Bowen is not adventurous.
Marshall is not breakable.
Cuthbert is not self-confident.
Shawn is not breakable.
Clark is happy.
Clark is self-confident.
Marshall is not self-confident.If there is someone who is happy, then Cuthbert is adventurous and Bowen is united.
Marshall being united is equivalent to Shawn being self-confident and Cedric being breakable.
It can be concluded that Clark is not breakable once knowing that Calvin is disgusted or Clark is not happy.
Someone who is not self-confident or breakable is always not disgusted and happy.
Clark is adventurous if and only if Marshall is disgusted.
If all people are disgusted, then Shawn is not happy.
If someone is not self-confident, then he is not breakable.
Bowen is happy if and only if Cuthbert is not breakable.
Shawn being happy or Cedric being breakable implies that Calvin is not united.
If there is at least one people who is united, then Cedric is not self-confident and Calvin is breakable.
If someone is not adventurous and breakable, then he is not self-confident, and vice versa.
If someone is adventurous, then he is happy, and vice versa. | Marshall is not united. | neutral |
Shawn is not happy.
Cuthbert is breakable.
Cedric is not adventurous.
Cedric is not united.
Bowen is united.
Bowen is not adventurous.
Marshall is not breakable.
Cuthbert is not self-confident.
Shawn is not breakable.
Clark is happy.
Clark is self-confident.
Marshall is not self-confident.If there is someone who is happy, then Cuthbert is adventurous and Bowen is united.
Marshall being united is equivalent to Shawn being self-confident and Cedric being breakable.
It can be concluded that Clark is not breakable once knowing that Calvin is disgusted or Clark is not happy.
Someone who is not self-confident or breakable is always not disgusted and happy.
Clark is adventurous if and only if Marshall is disgusted.
If all people are disgusted, then Shawn is not happy.
If someone is not self-confident, then he is not breakable.
Bowen is happy if and only if Cuthbert is not breakable.
Shawn being happy or Cedric being breakable implies that Calvin is not united.
If there is at least one people who is united, then Cedric is not self-confident and Calvin is breakable.
If someone is not adventurous and breakable, then he is not self-confident, and vice versa.
If someone is adventurous, then he is happy, and vice versa. | Calvin is not happy. | contradiction |
Shawn is not happy.
Cuthbert is breakable.
Cedric is not adventurous.
Cedric is not united.
Bowen is united.
Bowen is not adventurous.
Marshall is not breakable.
Cuthbert is not self-confident.
Shawn is not breakable.
Clark is happy.
Clark is self-confident.
Marshall is not self-confident.If there is someone who is happy, then Cuthbert is adventurous and Bowen is united.
Marshall being united is equivalent to Shawn being self-confident and Cedric being breakable.
It can be concluded that Clark is not breakable once knowing that Calvin is disgusted or Clark is not happy.
Someone who is not self-confident or breakable is always not disgusted and happy.
Clark is adventurous if and only if Marshall is disgusted.
If all people are disgusted, then Shawn is not happy.
If someone is not self-confident, then he is not breakable.
Bowen is happy if and only if Cuthbert is not breakable.
Shawn being happy or Cedric being breakable implies that Calvin is not united.
If there is at least one people who is united, then Cedric is not self-confident and Calvin is breakable.
If someone is not adventurous and breakable, then he is not self-confident, and vice versa.
If someone is adventurous, then he is happy, and vice versa. | Clark is not united. | neutral |
Shawn is not happy.
Cuthbert is breakable.
Cedric is not adventurous.
Cedric is not united.
Bowen is united.
Bowen is not adventurous.
Marshall is not breakable.
Cuthbert is not self-confident.
Shawn is not breakable.
Clark is happy.
Clark is self-confident.
Marshall is not self-confident.If there is someone who is happy, then Cuthbert is adventurous and Bowen is united.
Marshall being united is equivalent to Shawn being self-confident and Cedric being breakable.
It can be concluded that Clark is not breakable once knowing that Calvin is disgusted or Clark is not happy.
Someone who is not self-confident or breakable is always not disgusted and happy.
Clark is adventurous if and only if Marshall is disgusted.
If all people are disgusted, then Shawn is not happy.
If someone is not self-confident, then he is not breakable.
Bowen is happy if and only if Cuthbert is not breakable.
Shawn being happy or Cedric being breakable implies that Calvin is not united.
If there is at least one people who is united, then Cedric is not self-confident and Calvin is breakable.
If someone is not adventurous and breakable, then he is not self-confident, and vice versa.
If someone is adventurous, then he is happy, and vice versa. | Marshall is not happy. | contradiction |
Shawn is not happy.
Cuthbert is breakable.
Cedric is not adventurous.
Cedric is not united.
Bowen is united.
Bowen is not adventurous.
Marshall is not breakable.
Cuthbert is not self-confident.
Shawn is not breakable.
Clark is happy.
Clark is self-confident.
Marshall is not self-confident.If there is someone who is happy, then Cuthbert is adventurous and Bowen is united.
Marshall being united is equivalent to Shawn being self-confident and Cedric being breakable.
It can be concluded that Clark is not breakable once knowing that Calvin is disgusted or Clark is not happy.
Someone who is not self-confident or breakable is always not disgusted and happy.
Clark is adventurous if and only if Marshall is disgusted.
If all people are disgusted, then Shawn is not happy.
If someone is not self-confident, then he is not breakable.
Bowen is happy if and only if Cuthbert is not breakable.
Shawn being happy or Cedric being breakable implies that Calvin is not united.
If there is at least one people who is united, then Cedric is not self-confident and Calvin is breakable.
If someone is not adventurous and breakable, then he is not self-confident, and vice versa.
If someone is adventurous, then he is happy, and vice versa. | Calvin is not disgusted. | entailment |
Shawn is not happy.
Cuthbert is breakable.
Cedric is not adventurous.
Cedric is not united.
Bowen is united.
Bowen is not adventurous.
Marshall is not breakable.
Cuthbert is not self-confident.
Shawn is not breakable.
Clark is happy.
Clark is self-confident.
Marshall is not self-confident.If there is someone who is happy, then Cuthbert is adventurous and Bowen is united.
Marshall being united is equivalent to Shawn being self-confident and Cedric being breakable.
It can be concluded that Clark is not breakable once knowing that Calvin is disgusted or Clark is not happy.
Someone who is not self-confident or breakable is always not disgusted and happy.
Clark is adventurous if and only if Marshall is disgusted.
If all people are disgusted, then Shawn is not happy.
If someone is not self-confident, then he is not breakable.
Bowen is happy if and only if Cuthbert is not breakable.
Shawn being happy or Cedric being breakable implies that Calvin is not united.
If there is at least one people who is united, then Cedric is not self-confident and Calvin is breakable.
If someone is not adventurous and breakable, then he is not self-confident, and vice versa.
If someone is adventurous, then he is happy, and vice versa. | Cedric is adventurous. | self_contradiction |
Shawn is not happy.
Cuthbert is breakable.
Cedric is not adventurous.
Cedric is not united.
Bowen is united.
Bowen is not adventurous.
Marshall is not breakable.
Cuthbert is not self-confident.
Shawn is not breakable.
Clark is happy.
Clark is self-confident.
Marshall is not self-confident.If there is someone who is happy, then Cuthbert is adventurous and Bowen is united.
Marshall being united is equivalent to Shawn being self-confident and Cedric being breakable.
It can be concluded that Clark is not breakable once knowing that Calvin is disgusted or Clark is not happy.
Someone who is not self-confident or breakable is always not disgusted and happy.
Clark is adventurous if and only if Marshall is disgusted.
If all people are disgusted, then Shawn is not happy.
If someone is not self-confident, then he is not breakable.
Bowen is happy if and only if Cuthbert is not breakable.
Shawn being happy or Cedric being breakable implies that Calvin is not united.
If there is at least one people who is united, then Cedric is not self-confident and Calvin is breakable.
If someone is not adventurous and breakable, then he is not self-confident, and vice versa.
If someone is adventurous, then he is happy, and vice versa. | Shawn is not breakable. | entailment |
Shawn is not happy.
Cuthbert is breakable.
Cedric is not adventurous.
Cedric is not united.
Bowen is united.
Bowen is not adventurous.
Marshall is not breakable.
Cuthbert is not self-confident.
Shawn is not breakable.
Clark is happy.
Clark is self-confident.
Marshall is not self-confident.If there is someone who is happy, then Cuthbert is adventurous and Bowen is united.
Marshall being united is equivalent to Shawn being self-confident and Cedric being breakable.
It can be concluded that Clark is not breakable once knowing that Calvin is disgusted or Clark is not happy.
Someone who is not self-confident or breakable is always not disgusted and happy.
Clark is adventurous if and only if Marshall is disgusted.
If all people are disgusted, then Shawn is not happy.
If someone is not self-confident, then he is not breakable.
Bowen is happy if and only if Cuthbert is not breakable.
Shawn being happy or Cedric being breakable implies that Calvin is not united.
If there is at least one people who is united, then Cedric is not self-confident and Calvin is breakable.
If someone is not adventurous and breakable, then he is not self-confident, and vice versa.
If someone is adventurous, then he is happy, and vice versa. | Marshall is not self-confident. | entailment |
Shawn is not happy.
Cuthbert is breakable.
Cedric is not adventurous.
Cedric is not united.
Bowen is united.
Bowen is not adventurous.
Marshall is not breakable.
Cuthbert is not self-confident.
Shawn is not breakable.
Clark is happy.
Clark is self-confident.
Marshall is not self-confident.If there is someone who is happy, then Cuthbert is adventurous and Bowen is united.
Marshall being united is equivalent to Shawn being self-confident and Cedric being breakable.
It can be concluded that Clark is not breakable once knowing that Calvin is disgusted or Clark is not happy.
Someone who is not self-confident or breakable is always not disgusted and happy.
Clark is adventurous if and only if Marshall is disgusted.
If all people are disgusted, then Shawn is not happy.
If someone is not self-confident, then he is not breakable.
Bowen is happy if and only if Cuthbert is not breakable.
Shawn being happy or Cedric being breakable implies that Calvin is not united.
If there is at least one people who is united, then Cedric is not self-confident and Calvin is breakable.
If someone is not adventurous and breakable, then he is not self-confident, and vice versa.
If someone is adventurous, then he is happy, and vice versa. | Cuthbert is not breakable. | self_contradiction |
Shawn is not happy.
Cuthbert is breakable.
Cedric is not adventurous.
Cedric is not united.
Bowen is united.
Bowen is not adventurous.
Marshall is not breakable.
Cuthbert is not self-confident.
Shawn is not breakable.
Clark is happy.
Clark is self-confident.
Marshall is not self-confident.If there is someone who is happy, then Cuthbert is adventurous and Bowen is united.
Marshall being united is equivalent to Shawn being self-confident and Cedric being breakable.
It can be concluded that Clark is not breakable once knowing that Calvin is disgusted or Clark is not happy.
Someone who is not self-confident or breakable is always not disgusted and happy.
Clark is adventurous if and only if Marshall is disgusted.
If all people are disgusted, then Shawn is not happy.
If someone is not self-confident, then he is not breakable.
Bowen is happy if and only if Cuthbert is not breakable.
Shawn being happy or Cedric being breakable implies that Calvin is not united.
If there is at least one people who is united, then Cedric is not self-confident and Calvin is breakable.
If someone is not adventurous and breakable, then he is not self-confident, and vice versa.
If someone is adventurous, then he is happy, and vice versa. | Calvin is disgusted. | contradiction |
Shawn is not happy.
Cuthbert is breakable.
Cedric is not adventurous.
Cedric is not united.
Bowen is united.
Bowen is not adventurous.
Marshall is not breakable.
Cuthbert is not self-confident.
Shawn is not breakable.
Clark is happy.
Clark is self-confident.
Marshall is not self-confident.If there is someone who is happy, then Cuthbert is adventurous and Bowen is united.
Marshall being united is equivalent to Shawn being self-confident and Cedric being breakable.
It can be concluded that Clark is not breakable once knowing that Calvin is disgusted or Clark is not happy.
Someone who is not self-confident or breakable is always not disgusted and happy.
Clark is adventurous if and only if Marshall is disgusted.
If all people are disgusted, then Shawn is not happy.
If someone is not self-confident, then he is not breakable.
Bowen is happy if and only if Cuthbert is not breakable.
Shawn being happy or Cedric being breakable implies that Calvin is not united.
If there is at least one people who is united, then Cedric is not self-confident and Calvin is breakable.
If someone is not adventurous and breakable, then he is not self-confident, and vice versa.
If someone is adventurous, then he is happy, and vice versa. | Bowen is not happy. | contradiction |
Shawn is not happy.
Cuthbert is breakable.
Cedric is not adventurous.
Cedric is not united.
Bowen is united.
Bowen is not adventurous.
Marshall is not breakable.
Cuthbert is not self-confident.
Shawn is not breakable.
Clark is happy.
Clark is self-confident.
Marshall is not self-confident.If there is someone who is happy, then Cuthbert is adventurous and Bowen is united.
Marshall being united is equivalent to Shawn being self-confident and Cedric being breakable.
It can be concluded that Clark is not breakable once knowing that Calvin is disgusted or Clark is not happy.
Someone who is not self-confident or breakable is always not disgusted and happy.
Clark is adventurous if and only if Marshall is disgusted.
If all people are disgusted, then Shawn is not happy.
If someone is not self-confident, then he is not breakable.
Bowen is happy if and only if Cuthbert is not breakable.
Shawn being happy or Cedric being breakable implies that Calvin is not united.
If there is at least one people who is united, then Cedric is not self-confident and Calvin is breakable.
If someone is not adventurous and breakable, then he is not self-confident, and vice versa.
If someone is adventurous, then he is happy, and vice versa. | Clark is not breakable. | neutral |
Shawn is not happy.
Cuthbert is breakable.
Cedric is not adventurous.
Cedric is not united.
Bowen is united.
Bowen is not adventurous.
Marshall is not breakable.
Cuthbert is not self-confident.
Shawn is not breakable.
Clark is happy.
Clark is self-confident.
Marshall is not self-confident.If there is someone who is happy, then Cuthbert is adventurous and Bowen is united.
Marshall being united is equivalent to Shawn being self-confident and Cedric being breakable.
It can be concluded that Clark is not breakable once knowing that Calvin is disgusted or Clark is not happy.
Someone who is not self-confident or breakable is always not disgusted and happy.
Clark is adventurous if and only if Marshall is disgusted.
If all people are disgusted, then Shawn is not happy.
If someone is not self-confident, then he is not breakable.
Bowen is happy if and only if Cuthbert is not breakable.
Shawn being happy or Cedric being breakable implies that Calvin is not united.
If there is at least one people who is united, then Cedric is not self-confident and Calvin is breakable.
If someone is not adventurous and breakable, then he is not self-confident, and vice versa.
If someone is adventurous, then he is happy, and vice versa. | Bowen is happy. | entailment |
Shawn is not happy.
Cuthbert is breakable.
Cedric is not adventurous.
Cedric is not united.
Bowen is united.
Bowen is not adventurous.
Marshall is not breakable.
Cuthbert is not self-confident.
Shawn is not breakable.
Clark is happy.
Clark is self-confident.
Marshall is not self-confident.If there is someone who is happy, then Cuthbert is adventurous and Bowen is united.
Marshall being united is equivalent to Shawn being self-confident and Cedric being breakable.
It can be concluded that Clark is not breakable once knowing that Calvin is disgusted or Clark is not happy.
Someone who is not self-confident or breakable is always not disgusted and happy.
Clark is adventurous if and only if Marshall is disgusted.
If all people are disgusted, then Shawn is not happy.
If someone is not self-confident, then he is not breakable.
Bowen is happy if and only if Cuthbert is not breakable.
Shawn being happy or Cedric being breakable implies that Calvin is not united.
If there is at least one people who is united, then Cedric is not self-confident and Calvin is breakable.
If someone is not adventurous and breakable, then he is not self-confident, and vice versa.
If someone is adventurous, then he is happy, and vice versa. | Clark is adventurous. | entailment |
Shawn is not happy.
Cuthbert is breakable.
Cedric is not adventurous.
Cedric is not united.
Bowen is united.
Bowen is not adventurous.
Marshall is not breakable.
Cuthbert is not self-confident.
Shawn is not breakable.
Clark is happy.
Clark is self-confident.
Marshall is not self-confident.If there is someone who is happy, then Cuthbert is adventurous and Bowen is united.
Marshall being united is equivalent to Shawn being self-confident and Cedric being breakable.
It can be concluded that Clark is not breakable once knowing that Calvin is disgusted or Clark is not happy.
Someone who is not self-confident or breakable is always not disgusted and happy.
Clark is adventurous if and only if Marshall is disgusted.
If all people are disgusted, then Shawn is not happy.
If someone is not self-confident, then he is not breakable.
Bowen is happy if and only if Cuthbert is not breakable.
Shawn being happy or Cedric being breakable implies that Calvin is not united.
If there is at least one people who is united, then Cedric is not self-confident and Calvin is breakable.
If someone is not adventurous and breakable, then he is not self-confident, and vice versa.
If someone is adventurous, then he is happy, and vice versa. | Clark is breakable. | neutral |
Shawn is not happy.
Cuthbert is breakable.
Cedric is not adventurous.
Cedric is not united.
Bowen is united.
Bowen is not adventurous.
Marshall is not breakable.
Cuthbert is not self-confident.
Shawn is not breakable.
Clark is happy.
Clark is self-confident.
Marshall is not self-confident.If there is someone who is happy, then Cuthbert is adventurous and Bowen is united.
Marshall being united is equivalent to Shawn being self-confident and Cedric being breakable.
It can be concluded that Clark is not breakable once knowing that Calvin is disgusted or Clark is not happy.
Someone who is not self-confident or breakable is always not disgusted and happy.
Clark is adventurous if and only if Marshall is disgusted.
If all people are disgusted, then Shawn is not happy.
If someone is not self-confident, then he is not breakable.
Bowen is happy if and only if Cuthbert is not breakable.
Shawn being happy or Cedric being breakable implies that Calvin is not united.
If there is at least one people who is united, then Cedric is not self-confident and Calvin is breakable.
If someone is not adventurous and breakable, then he is not self-confident, and vice versa.
If someone is adventurous, then he is happy, and vice versa. | Bowen is not breakable. | neutral |
Shawn is not happy.
Cuthbert is breakable.
Cedric is not adventurous.
Cedric is not united.
Bowen is united.
Bowen is not adventurous.
Marshall is not breakable.
Cuthbert is not self-confident.
Shawn is not breakable.
Clark is happy.
Clark is self-confident.
Marshall is not self-confident.If there is someone who is happy, then Cuthbert is adventurous and Bowen is united.
Marshall being united is equivalent to Shawn being self-confident and Cedric being breakable.
It can be concluded that Clark is not breakable once knowing that Calvin is disgusted or Clark is not happy.
Someone who is not self-confident or breakable is always not disgusted and happy.
Clark is adventurous if and only if Marshall is disgusted.
If all people are disgusted, then Shawn is not happy.
If someone is not self-confident, then he is not breakable.
Bowen is happy if and only if Cuthbert is not breakable.
Shawn being happy or Cedric being breakable implies that Calvin is not united.
If there is at least one people who is united, then Cedric is not self-confident and Calvin is breakable.
If someone is not adventurous and breakable, then he is not self-confident, and vice versa.
If someone is adventurous, then he is happy, and vice versa. | Marshall is not disgusted. | self_contradiction |
Theobold is not difficult.
Theobold is jealous.
Milton is global.
Scott is not confident.
Milton is confident.
Abraham is not green.
Chatwin is not confident.
Stephen is not global.
Stephen is difficult.
Stephen is not green.
Chatwin is green.
Debra is not global.It can be concluded that Abraham is not jealous and Chatwin is not difficult once knowing that Abraham is green.
It can be concluded that Debra is not jealous once knowing that Scott is not confident.
If someone is confident or he is not mad, then he is not jealous.
If Milton is not difficult, then Debra is not global and Stephen is green, and vice versa.
As long as someone is mad, he is difficult and jealous.
Milton being global implies that Milton is not confident.
Scott being global is equivalent to Milton being jealous.
It can be concluded that Milton is not jealous once knowing that Abraham is not global.
if there is at least one people who is global and mad, then Debra is confident and Debra is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is confident, then Theobold is not mad and Chatwin is not jealous.
If Chatwin is not confident, then Milton is difficult and Stephen is jealous.
If someone is jealous, then he is not confident, and vice versa. | Theobold is not green. | neutral |
Theobold is not difficult.
Theobold is jealous.
Milton is global.
Scott is not confident.
Milton is confident.
Abraham is not green.
Chatwin is not confident.
Stephen is not global.
Stephen is difficult.
Stephen is not green.
Chatwin is green.
Debra is not global.It can be concluded that Abraham is not jealous and Chatwin is not difficult once knowing that Abraham is green.
It can be concluded that Debra is not jealous once knowing that Scott is not confident.
If someone is confident or he is not mad, then he is not jealous.
If Milton is not difficult, then Debra is not global and Stephen is green, and vice versa.
As long as someone is mad, he is difficult and jealous.
Milton being global implies that Milton is not confident.
Scott being global is equivalent to Milton being jealous.
It can be concluded that Milton is not jealous once knowing that Abraham is not global.
if there is at least one people who is global and mad, then Debra is confident and Debra is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is confident, then Theobold is not mad and Chatwin is not jealous.
If Chatwin is not confident, then Milton is difficult and Stephen is jealous.
If someone is jealous, then he is not confident, and vice versa. | Theobold is mad. | contradiction |
Theobold is not difficult.
Theobold is jealous.
Milton is global.
Scott is not confident.
Milton is confident.
Abraham is not green.
Chatwin is not confident.
Stephen is not global.
Stephen is difficult.
Stephen is not green.
Chatwin is green.
Debra is not global.It can be concluded that Abraham is not jealous and Chatwin is not difficult once knowing that Abraham is green.
It can be concluded that Debra is not jealous once knowing that Scott is not confident.
If someone is confident or he is not mad, then he is not jealous.
If Milton is not difficult, then Debra is not global and Stephen is green, and vice versa.
As long as someone is mad, he is difficult and jealous.
Milton being global implies that Milton is not confident.
Scott being global is equivalent to Milton being jealous.
It can be concluded that Milton is not jealous once knowing that Abraham is not global.
if there is at least one people who is global and mad, then Debra is confident and Debra is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is confident, then Theobold is not mad and Chatwin is not jealous.
If Chatwin is not confident, then Milton is difficult and Stephen is jealous.
If someone is jealous, then he is not confident, and vice versa. | Abraham is not jealous. | neutral |
Theobold is not difficult.
Theobold is jealous.
Milton is global.
Scott is not confident.
Milton is confident.
Abraham is not green.
Chatwin is not confident.
Stephen is not global.
Stephen is difficult.
Stephen is not green.
Chatwin is green.
Debra is not global.It can be concluded that Abraham is not jealous and Chatwin is not difficult once knowing that Abraham is green.
It can be concluded that Debra is not jealous once knowing that Scott is not confident.
If someone is confident or he is not mad, then he is not jealous.
If Milton is not difficult, then Debra is not global and Stephen is green, and vice versa.
As long as someone is mad, he is difficult and jealous.
Milton being global implies that Milton is not confident.
Scott being global is equivalent to Milton being jealous.
It can be concluded that Milton is not jealous once knowing that Abraham is not global.
if there is at least one people who is global and mad, then Debra is confident and Debra is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is confident, then Theobold is not mad and Chatwin is not jealous.
If Chatwin is not confident, then Milton is difficult and Stephen is jealous.
If someone is jealous, then he is not confident, and vice versa. | Chatwin is not jealous. | self_contradiction |
Theobold is not difficult.
Theobold is jealous.
Milton is global.
Scott is not confident.
Milton is confident.
Abraham is not green.
Chatwin is not confident.
Stephen is not global.
Stephen is difficult.
Stephen is not green.
Chatwin is green.
Debra is not global.It can be concluded that Abraham is not jealous and Chatwin is not difficult once knowing that Abraham is green.
It can be concluded that Debra is not jealous once knowing that Scott is not confident.
If someone is confident or he is not mad, then he is not jealous.
If Milton is not difficult, then Debra is not global and Stephen is green, and vice versa.
As long as someone is mad, he is difficult and jealous.
Milton being global implies that Milton is not confident.
Scott being global is equivalent to Milton being jealous.
It can be concluded that Milton is not jealous once knowing that Abraham is not global.
if there is at least one people who is global and mad, then Debra is confident and Debra is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is confident, then Theobold is not mad and Chatwin is not jealous.
If Chatwin is not confident, then Milton is difficult and Stephen is jealous.
If someone is jealous, then he is not confident, and vice versa. | Theobold is not jealous. | self_contradiction |
Theobold is not difficult.
Theobold is jealous.
Milton is global.
Scott is not confident.
Milton is confident.
Abraham is not green.
Chatwin is not confident.
Stephen is not global.
Stephen is difficult.
Stephen is not green.
Chatwin is green.
Debra is not global.It can be concluded that Abraham is not jealous and Chatwin is not difficult once knowing that Abraham is green.
It can be concluded that Debra is not jealous once knowing that Scott is not confident.
If someone is confident or he is not mad, then he is not jealous.
If Milton is not difficult, then Debra is not global and Stephen is green, and vice versa.
As long as someone is mad, he is difficult and jealous.
Milton being global implies that Milton is not confident.
Scott being global is equivalent to Milton being jealous.
It can be concluded that Milton is not jealous once knowing that Abraham is not global.
if there is at least one people who is global and mad, then Debra is confident and Debra is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is confident, then Theobold is not mad and Chatwin is not jealous.
If Chatwin is not confident, then Milton is difficult and Stephen is jealous.
If someone is jealous, then he is not confident, and vice versa. | Theobold is difficult. | contradiction |
Theobold is not difficult.
Theobold is jealous.
Milton is global.
Scott is not confident.
Milton is confident.
Abraham is not green.
Chatwin is not confident.
Stephen is not global.
Stephen is difficult.
Stephen is not green.
Chatwin is green.
Debra is not global.It can be concluded that Abraham is not jealous and Chatwin is not difficult once knowing that Abraham is green.
It can be concluded that Debra is not jealous once knowing that Scott is not confident.
If someone is confident or he is not mad, then he is not jealous.
If Milton is not difficult, then Debra is not global and Stephen is green, and vice versa.
As long as someone is mad, he is difficult and jealous.
Milton being global implies that Milton is not confident.
Scott being global is equivalent to Milton being jealous.
It can be concluded that Milton is not jealous once knowing that Abraham is not global.
if there is at least one people who is global and mad, then Debra is confident and Debra is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is confident, then Theobold is not mad and Chatwin is not jealous.
If Chatwin is not confident, then Milton is difficult and Stephen is jealous.
If someone is jealous, then he is not confident, and vice versa. | Stephen is global. | contradiction |
Theobold is not difficult.
Theobold is jealous.
Milton is global.
Scott is not confident.
Milton is confident.
Abraham is not green.
Chatwin is not confident.
Stephen is not global.
Stephen is difficult.
Stephen is not green.
Chatwin is green.
Debra is not global.It can be concluded that Abraham is not jealous and Chatwin is not difficult once knowing that Abraham is green.
It can be concluded that Debra is not jealous once knowing that Scott is not confident.
If someone is confident or he is not mad, then he is not jealous.
If Milton is not difficult, then Debra is not global and Stephen is green, and vice versa.
As long as someone is mad, he is difficult and jealous.
Milton being global implies that Milton is not confident.
Scott being global is equivalent to Milton being jealous.
It can be concluded that Milton is not jealous once knowing that Abraham is not global.
if there is at least one people who is global and mad, then Debra is confident and Debra is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is confident, then Theobold is not mad and Chatwin is not jealous.
If Chatwin is not confident, then Milton is difficult and Stephen is jealous.
If someone is jealous, then he is not confident, and vice versa. | Chatwin is confident. | contradiction |
Theobold is not difficult.
Theobold is jealous.
Milton is global.
Scott is not confident.
Milton is confident.
Abraham is not green.
Chatwin is not confident.
Stephen is not global.
Stephen is difficult.
Stephen is not green.
Chatwin is green.
Debra is not global.It can be concluded that Abraham is not jealous and Chatwin is not difficult once knowing that Abraham is green.
It can be concluded that Debra is not jealous once knowing that Scott is not confident.
If someone is confident or he is not mad, then he is not jealous.
If Milton is not difficult, then Debra is not global and Stephen is green, and vice versa.
As long as someone is mad, he is difficult and jealous.
Milton being global implies that Milton is not confident.
Scott being global is equivalent to Milton being jealous.
It can be concluded that Milton is not jealous once knowing that Abraham is not global.
if there is at least one people who is global and mad, then Debra is confident and Debra is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is confident, then Theobold is not mad and Chatwin is not jealous.
If Chatwin is not confident, then Milton is difficult and Stephen is jealous.
If someone is jealous, then he is not confident, and vice versa. | Milton is jealous. | self_contradiction |
Theobold is not difficult.
Theobold is jealous.
Milton is global.
Scott is not confident.
Milton is confident.
Abraham is not green.
Chatwin is not confident.
Stephen is not global.
Stephen is difficult.
Stephen is not green.
Chatwin is green.
Debra is not global.It can be concluded that Abraham is not jealous and Chatwin is not difficult once knowing that Abraham is green.
It can be concluded that Debra is not jealous once knowing that Scott is not confident.
If someone is confident or he is not mad, then he is not jealous.
If Milton is not difficult, then Debra is not global and Stephen is green, and vice versa.
As long as someone is mad, he is difficult and jealous.
Milton being global implies that Milton is not confident.
Scott being global is equivalent to Milton being jealous.
It can be concluded that Milton is not jealous once knowing that Abraham is not global.
if there is at least one people who is global and mad, then Debra is confident and Debra is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is confident, then Theobold is not mad and Chatwin is not jealous.
If Chatwin is not confident, then Milton is difficult and Stephen is jealous.
If someone is jealous, then he is not confident, and vice versa. | Scott is not confident. | entailment |
Theobold is not difficult.
Theobold is jealous.
Milton is global.
Scott is not confident.
Milton is confident.
Abraham is not green.
Chatwin is not confident.
Stephen is not global.
Stephen is difficult.
Stephen is not green.
Chatwin is green.
Debra is not global.It can be concluded that Abraham is not jealous and Chatwin is not difficult once knowing that Abraham is green.
It can be concluded that Debra is not jealous once knowing that Scott is not confident.
If someone is confident or he is not mad, then he is not jealous.
If Milton is not difficult, then Debra is not global and Stephen is green, and vice versa.
As long as someone is mad, he is difficult and jealous.
Milton being global implies that Milton is not confident.
Scott being global is equivalent to Milton being jealous.
It can be concluded that Milton is not jealous once knowing that Abraham is not global.
if there is at least one people who is global and mad, then Debra is confident and Debra is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is confident, then Theobold is not mad and Chatwin is not jealous.
If Chatwin is not confident, then Milton is difficult and Stephen is jealous.
If someone is jealous, then he is not confident, and vice versa. | Milton is not jealous. | self_contradiction |
Theobold is not difficult.
Theobold is jealous.
Milton is global.
Scott is not confident.
Milton is confident.
Abraham is not green.
Chatwin is not confident.
Stephen is not global.
Stephen is difficult.
Stephen is not green.
Chatwin is green.
Debra is not global.It can be concluded that Abraham is not jealous and Chatwin is not difficult once knowing that Abraham is green.
It can be concluded that Debra is not jealous once knowing that Scott is not confident.
If someone is confident or he is not mad, then he is not jealous.
If Milton is not difficult, then Debra is not global and Stephen is green, and vice versa.
As long as someone is mad, he is difficult and jealous.
Milton being global implies that Milton is not confident.
Scott being global is equivalent to Milton being jealous.
It can be concluded that Milton is not jealous once knowing that Abraham is not global.
if there is at least one people who is global and mad, then Debra is confident and Debra is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is confident, then Theobold is not mad and Chatwin is not jealous.
If Chatwin is not confident, then Milton is difficult and Stephen is jealous.
If someone is jealous, then he is not confident, and vice versa. | Milton is difficult. | entailment |
Theobold is not difficult.
Theobold is jealous.
Milton is global.
Scott is not confident.
Milton is confident.
Abraham is not green.
Chatwin is not confident.
Stephen is not global.
Stephen is difficult.
Stephen is not green.
Chatwin is green.
Debra is not global.It can be concluded that Abraham is not jealous and Chatwin is not difficult once knowing that Abraham is green.
It can be concluded that Debra is not jealous once knowing that Scott is not confident.
If someone is confident or he is not mad, then he is not jealous.
If Milton is not difficult, then Debra is not global and Stephen is green, and vice versa.
As long as someone is mad, he is difficult and jealous.
Milton being global implies that Milton is not confident.
Scott being global is equivalent to Milton being jealous.
It can be concluded that Milton is not jealous once knowing that Abraham is not global.
if there is at least one people who is global and mad, then Debra is confident and Debra is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is confident, then Theobold is not mad and Chatwin is not jealous.
If Chatwin is not confident, then Milton is difficult and Stephen is jealous.
If someone is jealous, then he is not confident, and vice versa. | Milton is global. | entailment |
Theobold is not difficult.
Theobold is jealous.
Milton is global.
Scott is not confident.
Milton is confident.
Abraham is not green.
Chatwin is not confident.
Stephen is not global.
Stephen is difficult.
Stephen is not green.
Chatwin is green.
Debra is not global.It can be concluded that Abraham is not jealous and Chatwin is not difficult once knowing that Abraham is green.
It can be concluded that Debra is not jealous once knowing that Scott is not confident.
If someone is confident or he is not mad, then he is not jealous.
If Milton is not difficult, then Debra is not global and Stephen is green, and vice versa.
As long as someone is mad, he is difficult and jealous.
Milton being global implies that Milton is not confident.
Scott being global is equivalent to Milton being jealous.
It can be concluded that Milton is not jealous once knowing that Abraham is not global.
if there is at least one people who is global and mad, then Debra is confident and Debra is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is confident, then Theobold is not mad and Chatwin is not jealous.
If Chatwin is not confident, then Milton is difficult and Stephen is jealous.
If someone is jealous, then he is not confident, and vice versa. | Chatwin is not global. | neutral |
Theobold is not difficult.
Theobold is jealous.
Milton is global.
Scott is not confident.
Milton is confident.
Abraham is not green.
Chatwin is not confident.
Stephen is not global.
Stephen is difficult.
Stephen is not green.
Chatwin is green.
Debra is not global.It can be concluded that Abraham is not jealous and Chatwin is not difficult once knowing that Abraham is green.
It can be concluded that Debra is not jealous once knowing that Scott is not confident.
If someone is confident or he is not mad, then he is not jealous.
If Milton is not difficult, then Debra is not global and Stephen is green, and vice versa.
As long as someone is mad, he is difficult and jealous.
Milton being global implies that Milton is not confident.
Scott being global is equivalent to Milton being jealous.
It can be concluded that Milton is not jealous once knowing that Abraham is not global.
if there is at least one people who is global and mad, then Debra is confident and Debra is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is confident, then Theobold is not mad and Chatwin is not jealous.
If Chatwin is not confident, then Milton is difficult and Stephen is jealous.
If someone is jealous, then he is not confident, and vice versa. | Debra is difficult. | neutral |
Theobold is not difficult.
Theobold is jealous.
Milton is global.
Scott is not confident.
Milton is confident.
Abraham is not green.
Chatwin is not confident.
Stephen is not global.
Stephen is difficult.
Stephen is not green.
Chatwin is green.
Debra is not global.It can be concluded that Abraham is not jealous and Chatwin is not difficult once knowing that Abraham is green.
It can be concluded that Debra is not jealous once knowing that Scott is not confident.
If someone is confident or he is not mad, then he is not jealous.
If Milton is not difficult, then Debra is not global and Stephen is green, and vice versa.
As long as someone is mad, he is difficult and jealous.
Milton being global implies that Milton is not confident.
Scott being global is equivalent to Milton being jealous.
It can be concluded that Milton is not jealous once knowing that Abraham is not global.
if there is at least one people who is global and mad, then Debra is confident and Debra is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is confident, then Theobold is not mad and Chatwin is not jealous.
If Chatwin is not confident, then Milton is difficult and Stephen is jealous.
If someone is jealous, then he is not confident, and vice versa. | Stephen is not green. | entailment |
Theobold is not difficult.
Theobold is jealous.
Milton is global.
Scott is not confident.
Milton is confident.
Abraham is not green.
Chatwin is not confident.
Stephen is not global.
Stephen is difficult.
Stephen is not green.
Chatwin is green.
Debra is not global.It can be concluded that Abraham is not jealous and Chatwin is not difficult once knowing that Abraham is green.
It can be concluded that Debra is not jealous once knowing that Scott is not confident.
If someone is confident or he is not mad, then he is not jealous.
If Milton is not difficult, then Debra is not global and Stephen is green, and vice versa.
As long as someone is mad, he is difficult and jealous.
Milton being global implies that Milton is not confident.
Scott being global is equivalent to Milton being jealous.
It can be concluded that Milton is not jealous once knowing that Abraham is not global.
if there is at least one people who is global and mad, then Debra is confident and Debra is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is confident, then Theobold is not mad and Chatwin is not jealous.
If Chatwin is not confident, then Milton is difficult and Stephen is jealous.
If someone is jealous, then he is not confident, and vice versa. | Milton is not confident. | self_contradiction |
Theobold is not difficult.
Theobold is jealous.
Milton is global.
Scott is not confident.
Milton is confident.
Abraham is not green.
Chatwin is not confident.
Stephen is not global.
Stephen is difficult.
Stephen is not green.
Chatwin is green.
Debra is not global.It can be concluded that Abraham is not jealous and Chatwin is not difficult once knowing that Abraham is green.
It can be concluded that Debra is not jealous once knowing that Scott is not confident.
If someone is confident or he is not mad, then he is not jealous.
If Milton is not difficult, then Debra is not global and Stephen is green, and vice versa.
As long as someone is mad, he is difficult and jealous.
Milton being global implies that Milton is not confident.
Scott being global is equivalent to Milton being jealous.
It can be concluded that Milton is not jealous once knowing that Abraham is not global.
if there is at least one people who is global and mad, then Debra is confident and Debra is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is confident, then Theobold is not mad and Chatwin is not jealous.
If Chatwin is not confident, then Milton is difficult and Stephen is jealous.
If someone is jealous, then he is not confident, and vice versa. | Debra is not mad. | neutral |
Theobold is not difficult.
Theobold is jealous.
Milton is global.
Scott is not confident.
Milton is confident.
Abraham is not green.
Chatwin is not confident.
Stephen is not global.
Stephen is difficult.
Stephen is not green.
Chatwin is green.
Debra is not global.It can be concluded that Abraham is not jealous and Chatwin is not difficult once knowing that Abraham is green.
It can be concluded that Debra is not jealous once knowing that Scott is not confident.
If someone is confident or he is not mad, then he is not jealous.
If Milton is not difficult, then Debra is not global and Stephen is green, and vice versa.
As long as someone is mad, he is difficult and jealous.
Milton being global implies that Milton is not confident.
Scott being global is equivalent to Milton being jealous.
It can be concluded that Milton is not jealous once knowing that Abraham is not global.
if there is at least one people who is global and mad, then Debra is confident and Debra is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is confident, then Theobold is not mad and Chatwin is not jealous.
If Chatwin is not confident, then Milton is difficult and Stephen is jealous.
If someone is jealous, then he is not confident, and vice versa. | Stephen is not global. | entailment |
Theobold is not difficult.
Theobold is jealous.
Milton is global.
Scott is not confident.
Milton is confident.
Abraham is not green.
Chatwin is not confident.
Stephen is not global.
Stephen is difficult.
Stephen is not green.
Chatwin is green.
Debra is not global.It can be concluded that Abraham is not jealous and Chatwin is not difficult once knowing that Abraham is green.
It can be concluded that Debra is not jealous once knowing that Scott is not confident.
If someone is confident or he is not mad, then he is not jealous.
If Milton is not difficult, then Debra is not global and Stephen is green, and vice versa.
As long as someone is mad, he is difficult and jealous.
Milton being global implies that Milton is not confident.
Scott being global is equivalent to Milton being jealous.
It can be concluded that Milton is not jealous once knowing that Abraham is not global.
if there is at least one people who is global and mad, then Debra is confident and Debra is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is confident, then Theobold is not mad and Chatwin is not jealous.
If Chatwin is not confident, then Milton is difficult and Stephen is jealous.
If someone is jealous, then he is not confident, and vice versa. | Stephen is confident. | contradiction |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.