premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Solomon is not tough.
Miranda is not tough.
Colin is not orange.
Grayson is sore.
Grayson is not tough.
Shamus is not orange.
Grayson is smoggy.
Colin is not tough.
Ashley is not tough.
Todd is weary.
Shamus is romantic.
Shamus is smoggy.Grayson being not romantic or Miranda being not weary implies that Todd is sore.
Grayson being smoggy or Ashley being not weary implies that Ashley is not tough.
If Shamus is sore and Ashley is not weary, then Grayson is tough.
Someone who is romantic is always both not sore and not tough.
If someone is smoggy or he is not romantic, then he is not sore.
Someone being both not sore and not weary is equivalent to being romantic.
It can be concluded that Solomon is not weary once knowing that Ashley is not smoggy.
Someone is not sore if and only if he is not smoggy.
If someone is romantic or orange, then he is not sore.
If there is at least one people who is not tough, then Solomon is sore and Solomon is orange.
If Miranda is sore, then Todd is weary, and vice versa.
If Colin is sore, then Miranda is tough and Miranda is orange. | Miranda is weary. | neutral |
Solomon is not tough.
Miranda is not tough.
Colin is not orange.
Grayson is sore.
Grayson is not tough.
Shamus is not orange.
Grayson is smoggy.
Colin is not tough.
Ashley is not tough.
Todd is weary.
Shamus is romantic.
Shamus is smoggy.Grayson being not romantic or Miranda being not weary implies that Todd is sore.
Grayson being smoggy or Ashley being not weary implies that Ashley is not tough.
If Shamus is sore and Ashley is not weary, then Grayson is tough.
Someone who is romantic is always both not sore and not tough.
If someone is smoggy or he is not romantic, then he is not sore.
Someone being both not sore and not weary is equivalent to being romantic.
It can be concluded that Solomon is not weary once knowing that Ashley is not smoggy.
Someone is not sore if and only if he is not smoggy.
If someone is romantic or orange, then he is not sore.
If there is at least one people who is not tough, then Solomon is sore and Solomon is orange.
If Miranda is sore, then Todd is weary, and vice versa.
If Colin is sore, then Miranda is tough and Miranda is orange. | Shamus is not smoggy. | self_contradiction |
Solomon is not tough.
Miranda is not tough.
Colin is not orange.
Grayson is sore.
Grayson is not tough.
Shamus is not orange.
Grayson is smoggy.
Colin is not tough.
Ashley is not tough.
Todd is weary.
Shamus is romantic.
Shamus is smoggy.Grayson being not romantic or Miranda being not weary implies that Todd is sore.
Grayson being smoggy or Ashley being not weary implies that Ashley is not tough.
If Shamus is sore and Ashley is not weary, then Grayson is tough.
Someone who is romantic is always both not sore and not tough.
If someone is smoggy or he is not romantic, then he is not sore.
Someone being both not sore and not weary is equivalent to being romantic.
It can be concluded that Solomon is not weary once knowing that Ashley is not smoggy.
Someone is not sore if and only if he is not smoggy.
If someone is romantic or orange, then he is not sore.
If there is at least one people who is not tough, then Solomon is sore and Solomon is orange.
If Miranda is sore, then Todd is weary, and vice versa.
If Colin is sore, then Miranda is tough and Miranda is orange. | Grayson is sore. | self_contradiction |
Solomon is not tough.
Miranda is not tough.
Colin is not orange.
Grayson is sore.
Grayson is not tough.
Shamus is not orange.
Grayson is smoggy.
Colin is not tough.
Ashley is not tough.
Todd is weary.
Shamus is romantic.
Shamus is smoggy.Grayson being not romantic or Miranda being not weary implies that Todd is sore.
Grayson being smoggy or Ashley being not weary implies that Ashley is not tough.
If Shamus is sore and Ashley is not weary, then Grayson is tough.
Someone who is romantic is always both not sore and not tough.
If someone is smoggy or he is not romantic, then he is not sore.
Someone being both not sore and not weary is equivalent to being romantic.
It can be concluded that Solomon is not weary once knowing that Ashley is not smoggy.
Someone is not sore if and only if he is not smoggy.
If someone is romantic or orange, then he is not sore.
If there is at least one people who is not tough, then Solomon is sore and Solomon is orange.
If Miranda is sore, then Todd is weary, and vice versa.
If Colin is sore, then Miranda is tough and Miranda is orange. | Solomon is orange. | entailment |
Solomon is not tough.
Miranda is not tough.
Colin is not orange.
Grayson is sore.
Grayson is not tough.
Shamus is not orange.
Grayson is smoggy.
Colin is not tough.
Ashley is not tough.
Todd is weary.
Shamus is romantic.
Shamus is smoggy.Grayson being not romantic or Miranda being not weary implies that Todd is sore.
Grayson being smoggy or Ashley being not weary implies that Ashley is not tough.
If Shamus is sore and Ashley is not weary, then Grayson is tough.
Someone who is romantic is always both not sore and not tough.
If someone is smoggy or he is not romantic, then he is not sore.
Someone being both not sore and not weary is equivalent to being romantic.
It can be concluded that Solomon is not weary once knowing that Ashley is not smoggy.
Someone is not sore if and only if he is not smoggy.
If someone is romantic or orange, then he is not sore.
If there is at least one people who is not tough, then Solomon is sore and Solomon is orange.
If Miranda is sore, then Todd is weary, and vice versa.
If Colin is sore, then Miranda is tough and Miranda is orange. | Solomon is weary. | neutral |
Solomon is not tough.
Miranda is not tough.
Colin is not orange.
Grayson is sore.
Grayson is not tough.
Shamus is not orange.
Grayson is smoggy.
Colin is not tough.
Ashley is not tough.
Todd is weary.
Shamus is romantic.
Shamus is smoggy.Grayson being not romantic or Miranda being not weary implies that Todd is sore.
Grayson being smoggy or Ashley being not weary implies that Ashley is not tough.
If Shamus is sore and Ashley is not weary, then Grayson is tough.
Someone who is romantic is always both not sore and not tough.
If someone is smoggy or he is not romantic, then he is not sore.
Someone being both not sore and not weary is equivalent to being romantic.
It can be concluded that Solomon is not weary once knowing that Ashley is not smoggy.
Someone is not sore if and only if he is not smoggy.
If someone is romantic or orange, then he is not sore.
If there is at least one people who is not tough, then Solomon is sore and Solomon is orange.
If Miranda is sore, then Todd is weary, and vice versa.
If Colin is sore, then Miranda is tough and Miranda is orange. | Grayson is smoggy. | self_contradiction |
Solomon is not tough.
Miranda is not tough.
Colin is not orange.
Grayson is sore.
Grayson is not tough.
Shamus is not orange.
Grayson is smoggy.
Colin is not tough.
Ashley is not tough.
Todd is weary.
Shamus is romantic.
Shamus is smoggy.Grayson being not romantic or Miranda being not weary implies that Todd is sore.
Grayson being smoggy or Ashley being not weary implies that Ashley is not tough.
If Shamus is sore and Ashley is not weary, then Grayson is tough.
Someone who is romantic is always both not sore and not tough.
If someone is smoggy or he is not romantic, then he is not sore.
Someone being both not sore and not weary is equivalent to being romantic.
It can be concluded that Solomon is not weary once knowing that Ashley is not smoggy.
Someone is not sore if and only if he is not smoggy.
If someone is romantic or orange, then he is not sore.
If there is at least one people who is not tough, then Solomon is sore and Solomon is orange.
If Miranda is sore, then Todd is weary, and vice versa.
If Colin is sore, then Miranda is tough and Miranda is orange. | Solomon is romantic. | neutral |
Solomon is not tough.
Miranda is not tough.
Colin is not orange.
Grayson is sore.
Grayson is not tough.
Shamus is not orange.
Grayson is smoggy.
Colin is not tough.
Ashley is not tough.
Todd is weary.
Shamus is romantic.
Shamus is smoggy.Grayson being not romantic or Miranda being not weary implies that Todd is sore.
Grayson being smoggy or Ashley being not weary implies that Ashley is not tough.
If Shamus is sore and Ashley is not weary, then Grayson is tough.
Someone who is romantic is always both not sore and not tough.
If someone is smoggy or he is not romantic, then he is not sore.
Someone being both not sore and not weary is equivalent to being romantic.
It can be concluded that Solomon is not weary once knowing that Ashley is not smoggy.
Someone is not sore if and only if he is not smoggy.
If someone is romantic or orange, then he is not sore.
If there is at least one people who is not tough, then Solomon is sore and Solomon is orange.
If Miranda is sore, then Todd is weary, and vice versa.
If Colin is sore, then Miranda is tough and Miranda is orange. | Solomon is not orange. | contradiction |
Solomon is not tough.
Miranda is not tough.
Colin is not orange.
Grayson is sore.
Grayson is not tough.
Shamus is not orange.
Grayson is smoggy.
Colin is not tough.
Ashley is not tough.
Todd is weary.
Shamus is romantic.
Shamus is smoggy.Grayson being not romantic or Miranda being not weary implies that Todd is sore.
Grayson being smoggy or Ashley being not weary implies that Ashley is not tough.
If Shamus is sore and Ashley is not weary, then Grayson is tough.
Someone who is romantic is always both not sore and not tough.
If someone is smoggy or he is not romantic, then he is not sore.
Someone being both not sore and not weary is equivalent to being romantic.
It can be concluded that Solomon is not weary once knowing that Ashley is not smoggy.
Someone is not sore if and only if he is not smoggy.
If someone is romantic or orange, then he is not sore.
If there is at least one people who is not tough, then Solomon is sore and Solomon is orange.
If Miranda is sore, then Todd is weary, and vice versa.
If Colin is sore, then Miranda is tough and Miranda is orange. | Shamus is orange. | contradiction |
Solomon is not tough.
Miranda is not tough.
Colin is not orange.
Grayson is sore.
Grayson is not tough.
Shamus is not orange.
Grayson is smoggy.
Colin is not tough.
Ashley is not tough.
Todd is weary.
Shamus is romantic.
Shamus is smoggy.Grayson being not romantic or Miranda being not weary implies that Todd is sore.
Grayson being smoggy or Ashley being not weary implies that Ashley is not tough.
If Shamus is sore and Ashley is not weary, then Grayson is tough.
Someone who is romantic is always both not sore and not tough.
If someone is smoggy or he is not romantic, then he is not sore.
Someone being both not sore and not weary is equivalent to being romantic.
It can be concluded that Solomon is not weary once knowing that Ashley is not smoggy.
Someone is not sore if and only if he is not smoggy.
If someone is romantic or orange, then he is not sore.
If there is at least one people who is not tough, then Solomon is sore and Solomon is orange.
If Miranda is sore, then Todd is weary, and vice versa.
If Colin is sore, then Miranda is tough and Miranda is orange. | Shamus is not sore. | entailment |
Solomon is not tough.
Miranda is not tough.
Colin is not orange.
Grayson is sore.
Grayson is not tough.
Shamus is not orange.
Grayson is smoggy.
Colin is not tough.
Ashley is not tough.
Todd is weary.
Shamus is romantic.
Shamus is smoggy.Grayson being not romantic or Miranda being not weary implies that Todd is sore.
Grayson being smoggy or Ashley being not weary implies that Ashley is not tough.
If Shamus is sore and Ashley is not weary, then Grayson is tough.
Someone who is romantic is always both not sore and not tough.
If someone is smoggy or he is not romantic, then he is not sore.
Someone being both not sore and not weary is equivalent to being romantic.
It can be concluded that Solomon is not weary once knowing that Ashley is not smoggy.
Someone is not sore if and only if he is not smoggy.
If someone is romantic or orange, then he is not sore.
If there is at least one people who is not tough, then Solomon is sore and Solomon is orange.
If Miranda is sore, then Todd is weary, and vice versa.
If Colin is sore, then Miranda is tough and Miranda is orange. | Grayson is not weary. | neutral |
Solomon is not tough.
Miranda is not tough.
Colin is not orange.
Grayson is sore.
Grayson is not tough.
Shamus is not orange.
Grayson is smoggy.
Colin is not tough.
Ashley is not tough.
Todd is weary.
Shamus is romantic.
Shamus is smoggy.Grayson being not romantic or Miranda being not weary implies that Todd is sore.
Grayson being smoggy or Ashley being not weary implies that Ashley is not tough.
If Shamus is sore and Ashley is not weary, then Grayson is tough.
Someone who is romantic is always both not sore and not tough.
If someone is smoggy or he is not romantic, then he is not sore.
Someone being both not sore and not weary is equivalent to being romantic.
It can be concluded that Solomon is not weary once knowing that Ashley is not smoggy.
Someone is not sore if and only if he is not smoggy.
If someone is romantic or orange, then he is not sore.
If there is at least one people who is not tough, then Solomon is sore and Solomon is orange.
If Miranda is sore, then Todd is weary, and vice versa.
If Colin is sore, then Miranda is tough and Miranda is orange. | Grayson is tough. | contradiction |
Solomon is not tough.
Miranda is not tough.
Colin is not orange.
Grayson is sore.
Grayson is not tough.
Shamus is not orange.
Grayson is smoggy.
Colin is not tough.
Ashley is not tough.
Todd is weary.
Shamus is romantic.
Shamus is smoggy.Grayson being not romantic or Miranda being not weary implies that Todd is sore.
Grayson being smoggy or Ashley being not weary implies that Ashley is not tough.
If Shamus is sore and Ashley is not weary, then Grayson is tough.
Someone who is romantic is always both not sore and not tough.
If someone is smoggy or he is not romantic, then he is not sore.
Someone being both not sore and not weary is equivalent to being romantic.
It can be concluded that Solomon is not weary once knowing that Ashley is not smoggy.
Someone is not sore if and only if he is not smoggy.
If someone is romantic or orange, then he is not sore.
If there is at least one people who is not tough, then Solomon is sore and Solomon is orange.
If Miranda is sore, then Todd is weary, and vice versa.
If Colin is sore, then Miranda is tough and Miranda is orange. | Shamus is not tough. | entailment |
Solomon is not tough.
Miranda is not tough.
Colin is not orange.
Grayson is sore.
Grayson is not tough.
Shamus is not orange.
Grayson is smoggy.
Colin is not tough.
Ashley is not tough.
Todd is weary.
Shamus is romantic.
Shamus is smoggy.Grayson being not romantic or Miranda being not weary implies that Todd is sore.
Grayson being smoggy or Ashley being not weary implies that Ashley is not tough.
If Shamus is sore and Ashley is not weary, then Grayson is tough.
Someone who is romantic is always both not sore and not tough.
If someone is smoggy or he is not romantic, then he is not sore.
Someone being both not sore and not weary is equivalent to being romantic.
It can be concluded that Solomon is not weary once knowing that Ashley is not smoggy.
Someone is not sore if and only if he is not smoggy.
If someone is romantic or orange, then he is not sore.
If there is at least one people who is not tough, then Solomon is sore and Solomon is orange.
If Miranda is sore, then Todd is weary, and vice versa.
If Colin is sore, then Miranda is tough and Miranda is orange. | Shamus is not romantic. | contradiction |
Solomon is not tough.
Miranda is not tough.
Colin is not orange.
Grayson is sore.
Grayson is not tough.
Shamus is not orange.
Grayson is smoggy.
Colin is not tough.
Ashley is not tough.
Todd is weary.
Shamus is romantic.
Shamus is smoggy.Grayson being not romantic or Miranda being not weary implies that Todd is sore.
Grayson being smoggy or Ashley being not weary implies that Ashley is not tough.
If Shamus is sore and Ashley is not weary, then Grayson is tough.
Someone who is romantic is always both not sore and not tough.
If someone is smoggy or he is not romantic, then he is not sore.
Someone being both not sore and not weary is equivalent to being romantic.
It can be concluded that Solomon is not weary once knowing that Ashley is not smoggy.
Someone is not sore if and only if he is not smoggy.
If someone is romantic or orange, then he is not sore.
If there is at least one people who is not tough, then Solomon is sore and Solomon is orange.
If Miranda is sore, then Todd is weary, and vice versa.
If Colin is sore, then Miranda is tough and Miranda is orange. | Miranda is not weary. | neutral |
Solomon is not tough.
Miranda is not tough.
Colin is not orange.
Grayson is sore.
Grayson is not tough.
Shamus is not orange.
Grayson is smoggy.
Colin is not tough.
Ashley is not tough.
Todd is weary.
Shamus is romantic.
Shamus is smoggy.Grayson being not romantic or Miranda being not weary implies that Todd is sore.
Grayson being smoggy or Ashley being not weary implies that Ashley is not tough.
If Shamus is sore and Ashley is not weary, then Grayson is tough.
Someone who is romantic is always both not sore and not tough.
If someone is smoggy or he is not romantic, then he is not sore.
Someone being both not sore and not weary is equivalent to being romantic.
It can be concluded that Solomon is not weary once knowing that Ashley is not smoggy.
Someone is not sore if and only if he is not smoggy.
If someone is romantic or orange, then he is not sore.
If there is at least one people who is not tough, then Solomon is sore and Solomon is orange.
If Miranda is sore, then Todd is weary, and vice versa.
If Colin is sore, then Miranda is tough and Miranda is orange. | Grayson is not sore. | self_contradiction |
Solomon is not tough.
Miranda is not tough.
Colin is not orange.
Grayson is sore.
Grayson is not tough.
Shamus is not orange.
Grayson is smoggy.
Colin is not tough.
Ashley is not tough.
Todd is weary.
Shamus is romantic.
Shamus is smoggy.Grayson being not romantic or Miranda being not weary implies that Todd is sore.
Grayson being smoggy or Ashley being not weary implies that Ashley is not tough.
If Shamus is sore and Ashley is not weary, then Grayson is tough.
Someone who is romantic is always both not sore and not tough.
If someone is smoggy or he is not romantic, then he is not sore.
Someone being both not sore and not weary is equivalent to being romantic.
It can be concluded that Solomon is not weary once knowing that Ashley is not smoggy.
Someone is not sore if and only if he is not smoggy.
If someone is romantic or orange, then he is not sore.
If there is at least one people who is not tough, then Solomon is sore and Solomon is orange.
If Miranda is sore, then Todd is weary, and vice versa.
If Colin is sore, then Miranda is tough and Miranda is orange. | Grayson is not smoggy. | self_contradiction |
Solomon is not tough.
Miranda is not tough.
Colin is not orange.
Grayson is sore.
Grayson is not tough.
Shamus is not orange.
Grayson is smoggy.
Colin is not tough.
Ashley is not tough.
Todd is weary.
Shamus is romantic.
Shamus is smoggy.Grayson being not romantic or Miranda being not weary implies that Todd is sore.
Grayson being smoggy or Ashley being not weary implies that Ashley is not tough.
If Shamus is sore and Ashley is not weary, then Grayson is tough.
Someone who is romantic is always both not sore and not tough.
If someone is smoggy or he is not romantic, then he is not sore.
Someone being both not sore and not weary is equivalent to being romantic.
It can be concluded that Solomon is not weary once knowing that Ashley is not smoggy.
Someone is not sore if and only if he is not smoggy.
If someone is romantic or orange, then he is not sore.
If there is at least one people who is not tough, then Solomon is sore and Solomon is orange.
If Miranda is sore, then Todd is weary, and vice versa.
If Colin is sore, then Miranda is tough and Miranda is orange. | Grayson is not tough. | entailment |
Solomon is not tough.
Miranda is not tough.
Colin is not orange.
Grayson is sore.
Grayson is not tough.
Shamus is not orange.
Grayson is smoggy.
Colin is not tough.
Ashley is not tough.
Todd is weary.
Shamus is romantic.
Shamus is smoggy.Grayson being not romantic or Miranda being not weary implies that Todd is sore.
Grayson being smoggy or Ashley being not weary implies that Ashley is not tough.
If Shamus is sore and Ashley is not weary, then Grayson is tough.
Someone who is romantic is always both not sore and not tough.
If someone is smoggy or he is not romantic, then he is not sore.
Someone being both not sore and not weary is equivalent to being romantic.
It can be concluded that Solomon is not weary once knowing that Ashley is not smoggy.
Someone is not sore if and only if he is not smoggy.
If someone is romantic or orange, then he is not sore.
If there is at least one people who is not tough, then Solomon is sore and Solomon is orange.
If Miranda is sore, then Todd is weary, and vice versa.
If Colin is sore, then Miranda is tough and Miranda is orange. | Shamus is sore. | contradiction |
Solomon is not tough.
Miranda is not tough.
Colin is not orange.
Grayson is sore.
Grayson is not tough.
Shamus is not orange.
Grayson is smoggy.
Colin is not tough.
Ashley is not tough.
Todd is weary.
Shamus is romantic.
Shamus is smoggy.Grayson being not romantic or Miranda being not weary implies that Todd is sore.
Grayson being smoggy or Ashley being not weary implies that Ashley is not tough.
If Shamus is sore and Ashley is not weary, then Grayson is tough.
Someone who is romantic is always both not sore and not tough.
If someone is smoggy or he is not romantic, then he is not sore.
Someone being both not sore and not weary is equivalent to being romantic.
It can be concluded that Solomon is not weary once knowing that Ashley is not smoggy.
Someone is not sore if and only if he is not smoggy.
If someone is romantic or orange, then he is not sore.
If there is at least one people who is not tough, then Solomon is sore and Solomon is orange.
If Miranda is sore, then Todd is weary, and vice versa.
If Colin is sore, then Miranda is tough and Miranda is orange. | Miranda is not tough. | entailment |
Griswald is not sleepy.
Randolph is sleepy.
Hunter is innocent.
Justin is blue-eyed.
Hunter is generous.
Randolph is not cautious.
Vicki is sleepy.
Randolph is blue-eyed.
Griswald is not blue-eyed.
Justin is sleepy.
Justin is cautious.
Randolph is innocent.If there is someone who is not sleepy, then Justin is not generous.
It can be concluded that Justin is not cautious once knowing that Griswald is not sleepy or Austin is innocent.
If all people are not cautious or not blue-eyed, then Hunter is not generous.
Someone who is both not sleepy and not generous is always not cautious.
Justin is blue-eyed if and only if Hunter is generous.
If someone is not blue-eyed and sleepy, then he is beige, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Vicki is sleepy and Keegan is not innocent once knowing that Randolph is generous.
If Vicki is blue-eyed, then Keegan is beige, and vice versa.
Randolph being sleepy is equivalent to Keegan being not beige.
Griswald being not generous or Randolph being not cautious implies that Griswald is beige.
If someone is sleepy or he is not innocent, then he is cautious.
Vicki is not innocent if and only if Vicki is not beige. | Vicki is not generous. | neutral |
Griswald is not sleepy.
Randolph is sleepy.
Hunter is innocent.
Justin is blue-eyed.
Hunter is generous.
Randolph is not cautious.
Vicki is sleepy.
Randolph is blue-eyed.
Griswald is not blue-eyed.
Justin is sleepy.
Justin is cautious.
Randolph is innocent.If there is someone who is not sleepy, then Justin is not generous.
It can be concluded that Justin is not cautious once knowing that Griswald is not sleepy or Austin is innocent.
If all people are not cautious or not blue-eyed, then Hunter is not generous.
Someone who is both not sleepy and not generous is always not cautious.
Justin is blue-eyed if and only if Hunter is generous.
If someone is not blue-eyed and sleepy, then he is beige, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Vicki is sleepy and Keegan is not innocent once knowing that Randolph is generous.
If Vicki is blue-eyed, then Keegan is beige, and vice versa.
Randolph being sleepy is equivalent to Keegan being not beige.
Griswald being not generous or Randolph being not cautious implies that Griswald is beige.
If someone is sleepy or he is not innocent, then he is cautious.
Vicki is not innocent if and only if Vicki is not beige. | Randolph is not blue-eyed. | contradiction |
Griswald is not sleepy.
Randolph is sleepy.
Hunter is innocent.
Justin is blue-eyed.
Hunter is generous.
Randolph is not cautious.
Vicki is sleepy.
Randolph is blue-eyed.
Griswald is not blue-eyed.
Justin is sleepy.
Justin is cautious.
Randolph is innocent.If there is someone who is not sleepy, then Justin is not generous.
It can be concluded that Justin is not cautious once knowing that Griswald is not sleepy or Austin is innocent.
If all people are not cautious or not blue-eyed, then Hunter is not generous.
Someone who is both not sleepy and not generous is always not cautious.
Justin is blue-eyed if and only if Hunter is generous.
If someone is not blue-eyed and sleepy, then he is beige, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Vicki is sleepy and Keegan is not innocent once knowing that Randolph is generous.
If Vicki is blue-eyed, then Keegan is beige, and vice versa.
Randolph being sleepy is equivalent to Keegan being not beige.
Griswald being not generous or Randolph being not cautious implies that Griswald is beige.
If someone is sleepy or he is not innocent, then he is cautious.
Vicki is not innocent if and only if Vicki is not beige. | Griswald is not sleepy. | self_contradiction |
Griswald is not sleepy.
Randolph is sleepy.
Hunter is innocent.
Justin is blue-eyed.
Hunter is generous.
Randolph is not cautious.
Vicki is sleepy.
Randolph is blue-eyed.
Griswald is not blue-eyed.
Justin is sleepy.
Justin is cautious.
Randolph is innocent.If there is someone who is not sleepy, then Justin is not generous.
It can be concluded that Justin is not cautious once knowing that Griswald is not sleepy or Austin is innocent.
If all people are not cautious or not blue-eyed, then Hunter is not generous.
Someone who is both not sleepy and not generous is always not cautious.
Justin is blue-eyed if and only if Hunter is generous.
If someone is not blue-eyed and sleepy, then he is beige, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Vicki is sleepy and Keegan is not innocent once knowing that Randolph is generous.
If Vicki is blue-eyed, then Keegan is beige, and vice versa.
Randolph being sleepy is equivalent to Keegan being not beige.
Griswald being not generous or Randolph being not cautious implies that Griswald is beige.
If someone is sleepy or he is not innocent, then he is cautious.
Vicki is not innocent if and only if Vicki is not beige. | Hunter is sleepy. | neutral |
Griswald is not sleepy.
Randolph is sleepy.
Hunter is innocent.
Justin is blue-eyed.
Hunter is generous.
Randolph is not cautious.
Vicki is sleepy.
Randolph is blue-eyed.
Griswald is not blue-eyed.
Justin is sleepy.
Justin is cautious.
Randolph is innocent.If there is someone who is not sleepy, then Justin is not generous.
It can be concluded that Justin is not cautious once knowing that Griswald is not sleepy or Austin is innocent.
If all people are not cautious or not blue-eyed, then Hunter is not generous.
Someone who is both not sleepy and not generous is always not cautious.
Justin is blue-eyed if and only if Hunter is generous.
If someone is not blue-eyed and sleepy, then he is beige, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Vicki is sleepy and Keegan is not innocent once knowing that Randolph is generous.
If Vicki is blue-eyed, then Keegan is beige, and vice versa.
Randolph being sleepy is equivalent to Keegan being not beige.
Griswald being not generous or Randolph being not cautious implies that Griswald is beige.
If someone is sleepy or he is not innocent, then he is cautious.
Vicki is not innocent if and only if Vicki is not beige. | Randolph is cautious. | self_contradiction |
Griswald is not sleepy.
Randolph is sleepy.
Hunter is innocent.
Justin is blue-eyed.
Hunter is generous.
Randolph is not cautious.
Vicki is sleepy.
Randolph is blue-eyed.
Griswald is not blue-eyed.
Justin is sleepy.
Justin is cautious.
Randolph is innocent.If there is someone who is not sleepy, then Justin is not generous.
It can be concluded that Justin is not cautious once knowing that Griswald is not sleepy or Austin is innocent.
If all people are not cautious or not blue-eyed, then Hunter is not generous.
Someone who is both not sleepy and not generous is always not cautious.
Justin is blue-eyed if and only if Hunter is generous.
If someone is not blue-eyed and sleepy, then he is beige, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Vicki is sleepy and Keegan is not innocent once knowing that Randolph is generous.
If Vicki is blue-eyed, then Keegan is beige, and vice versa.
Randolph being sleepy is equivalent to Keegan being not beige.
Griswald being not generous or Randolph being not cautious implies that Griswald is beige.
If someone is sleepy or he is not innocent, then he is cautious.
Vicki is not innocent if and only if Vicki is not beige. | Randolph is not beige. | neutral |
Griswald is not sleepy.
Randolph is sleepy.
Hunter is innocent.
Justin is blue-eyed.
Hunter is generous.
Randolph is not cautious.
Vicki is sleepy.
Randolph is blue-eyed.
Griswald is not blue-eyed.
Justin is sleepy.
Justin is cautious.
Randolph is innocent.If there is someone who is not sleepy, then Justin is not generous.
It can be concluded that Justin is not cautious once knowing that Griswald is not sleepy or Austin is innocent.
If all people are not cautious or not blue-eyed, then Hunter is not generous.
Someone who is both not sleepy and not generous is always not cautious.
Justin is blue-eyed if and only if Hunter is generous.
If someone is not blue-eyed and sleepy, then he is beige, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Vicki is sleepy and Keegan is not innocent once knowing that Randolph is generous.
If Vicki is blue-eyed, then Keegan is beige, and vice versa.
Randolph being sleepy is equivalent to Keegan being not beige.
Griswald being not generous or Randolph being not cautious implies that Griswald is beige.
If someone is sleepy or he is not innocent, then he is cautious.
Vicki is not innocent if and only if Vicki is not beige. | Justin is blue-eyed. | entailment |
Griswald is not sleepy.
Randolph is sleepy.
Hunter is innocent.
Justin is blue-eyed.
Hunter is generous.
Randolph is not cautious.
Vicki is sleepy.
Randolph is blue-eyed.
Griswald is not blue-eyed.
Justin is sleepy.
Justin is cautious.
Randolph is innocent.If there is someone who is not sleepy, then Justin is not generous.
It can be concluded that Justin is not cautious once knowing that Griswald is not sleepy or Austin is innocent.
If all people are not cautious or not blue-eyed, then Hunter is not generous.
Someone who is both not sleepy and not generous is always not cautious.
Justin is blue-eyed if and only if Hunter is generous.
If someone is not blue-eyed and sleepy, then he is beige, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Vicki is sleepy and Keegan is not innocent once knowing that Randolph is generous.
If Vicki is blue-eyed, then Keegan is beige, and vice versa.
Randolph being sleepy is equivalent to Keegan being not beige.
Griswald being not generous or Randolph being not cautious implies that Griswald is beige.
If someone is sleepy or he is not innocent, then he is cautious.
Vicki is not innocent if and only if Vicki is not beige. | Vicki is cautious. | entailment |
Griswald is not sleepy.
Randolph is sleepy.
Hunter is innocent.
Justin is blue-eyed.
Hunter is generous.
Randolph is not cautious.
Vicki is sleepy.
Randolph is blue-eyed.
Griswald is not blue-eyed.
Justin is sleepy.
Justin is cautious.
Randolph is innocent.If there is someone who is not sleepy, then Justin is not generous.
It can be concluded that Justin is not cautious once knowing that Griswald is not sleepy or Austin is innocent.
If all people are not cautious or not blue-eyed, then Hunter is not generous.
Someone who is both not sleepy and not generous is always not cautious.
Justin is blue-eyed if and only if Hunter is generous.
If someone is not blue-eyed and sleepy, then he is beige, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Vicki is sleepy and Keegan is not innocent once knowing that Randolph is generous.
If Vicki is blue-eyed, then Keegan is beige, and vice versa.
Randolph being sleepy is equivalent to Keegan being not beige.
Griswald being not generous or Randolph being not cautious implies that Griswald is beige.
If someone is sleepy or he is not innocent, then he is cautious.
Vicki is not innocent if and only if Vicki is not beige. | Vicki is sleepy. | entailment |
Griswald is not sleepy.
Randolph is sleepy.
Hunter is innocent.
Justin is blue-eyed.
Hunter is generous.
Randolph is not cautious.
Vicki is sleepy.
Randolph is blue-eyed.
Griswald is not blue-eyed.
Justin is sleepy.
Justin is cautious.
Randolph is innocent.If there is someone who is not sleepy, then Justin is not generous.
It can be concluded that Justin is not cautious once knowing that Griswald is not sleepy or Austin is innocent.
If all people are not cautious or not blue-eyed, then Hunter is not generous.
Someone who is both not sleepy and not generous is always not cautious.
Justin is blue-eyed if and only if Hunter is generous.
If someone is not blue-eyed and sleepy, then he is beige, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Vicki is sleepy and Keegan is not innocent once knowing that Randolph is generous.
If Vicki is blue-eyed, then Keegan is beige, and vice versa.
Randolph being sleepy is equivalent to Keegan being not beige.
Griswald being not generous or Randolph being not cautious implies that Griswald is beige.
If someone is sleepy or he is not innocent, then he is cautious.
Vicki is not innocent if and only if Vicki is not beige. | Keegan is beige. | contradiction |
Griswald is not sleepy.
Randolph is sleepy.
Hunter is innocent.
Justin is blue-eyed.
Hunter is generous.
Randolph is not cautious.
Vicki is sleepy.
Randolph is blue-eyed.
Griswald is not blue-eyed.
Justin is sleepy.
Justin is cautious.
Randolph is innocent.If there is someone who is not sleepy, then Justin is not generous.
It can be concluded that Justin is not cautious once knowing that Griswald is not sleepy or Austin is innocent.
If all people are not cautious or not blue-eyed, then Hunter is not generous.
Someone who is both not sleepy and not generous is always not cautious.
Justin is blue-eyed if and only if Hunter is generous.
If someone is not blue-eyed and sleepy, then he is beige, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Vicki is sleepy and Keegan is not innocent once knowing that Randolph is generous.
If Vicki is blue-eyed, then Keegan is beige, and vice versa.
Randolph being sleepy is equivalent to Keegan being not beige.
Griswald being not generous or Randolph being not cautious implies that Griswald is beige.
If someone is sleepy or he is not innocent, then he is cautious.
Vicki is not innocent if and only if Vicki is not beige. | Justin is cautious. | self_contradiction |
Griswald is not sleepy.
Randolph is sleepy.
Hunter is innocent.
Justin is blue-eyed.
Hunter is generous.
Randolph is not cautious.
Vicki is sleepy.
Randolph is blue-eyed.
Griswald is not blue-eyed.
Justin is sleepy.
Justin is cautious.
Randolph is innocent.If there is someone who is not sleepy, then Justin is not generous.
It can be concluded that Justin is not cautious once knowing that Griswald is not sleepy or Austin is innocent.
If all people are not cautious or not blue-eyed, then Hunter is not generous.
Someone who is both not sleepy and not generous is always not cautious.
Justin is blue-eyed if and only if Hunter is generous.
If someone is not blue-eyed and sleepy, then he is beige, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Vicki is sleepy and Keegan is not innocent once knowing that Randolph is generous.
If Vicki is blue-eyed, then Keegan is beige, and vice versa.
Randolph being sleepy is equivalent to Keegan being not beige.
Griswald being not generous or Randolph being not cautious implies that Griswald is beige.
If someone is sleepy or he is not innocent, then he is cautious.
Vicki is not innocent if and only if Vicki is not beige. | Justin is not blue-eyed. | contradiction |
Griswald is not sleepy.
Randolph is sleepy.
Hunter is innocent.
Justin is blue-eyed.
Hunter is generous.
Randolph is not cautious.
Vicki is sleepy.
Randolph is blue-eyed.
Griswald is not blue-eyed.
Justin is sleepy.
Justin is cautious.
Randolph is innocent.If there is someone who is not sleepy, then Justin is not generous.
It can be concluded that Justin is not cautious once knowing that Griswald is not sleepy or Austin is innocent.
If all people are not cautious or not blue-eyed, then Hunter is not generous.
Someone who is both not sleepy and not generous is always not cautious.
Justin is blue-eyed if and only if Hunter is generous.
If someone is not blue-eyed and sleepy, then he is beige, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Vicki is sleepy and Keegan is not innocent once knowing that Randolph is generous.
If Vicki is blue-eyed, then Keegan is beige, and vice versa.
Randolph being sleepy is equivalent to Keegan being not beige.
Griswald being not generous or Randolph being not cautious implies that Griswald is beige.
If someone is sleepy or he is not innocent, then he is cautious.
Vicki is not innocent if and only if Vicki is not beige. | Griswald is sleepy. | self_contradiction |
Griswald is not sleepy.
Randolph is sleepy.
Hunter is innocent.
Justin is blue-eyed.
Hunter is generous.
Randolph is not cautious.
Vicki is sleepy.
Randolph is blue-eyed.
Griswald is not blue-eyed.
Justin is sleepy.
Justin is cautious.
Randolph is innocent.If there is someone who is not sleepy, then Justin is not generous.
It can be concluded that Justin is not cautious once knowing that Griswald is not sleepy or Austin is innocent.
If all people are not cautious or not blue-eyed, then Hunter is not generous.
Someone who is both not sleepy and not generous is always not cautious.
Justin is blue-eyed if and only if Hunter is generous.
If someone is not blue-eyed and sleepy, then he is beige, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Vicki is sleepy and Keegan is not innocent once knowing that Randolph is generous.
If Vicki is blue-eyed, then Keegan is beige, and vice versa.
Randolph being sleepy is equivalent to Keegan being not beige.
Griswald being not generous or Randolph being not cautious implies that Griswald is beige.
If someone is sleepy or he is not innocent, then he is cautious.
Vicki is not innocent if and only if Vicki is not beige. | Justin is innocent. | neutral |
Griswald is not sleepy.
Randolph is sleepy.
Hunter is innocent.
Justin is blue-eyed.
Hunter is generous.
Randolph is not cautious.
Vicki is sleepy.
Randolph is blue-eyed.
Griswald is not blue-eyed.
Justin is sleepy.
Justin is cautious.
Randolph is innocent.If there is someone who is not sleepy, then Justin is not generous.
It can be concluded that Justin is not cautious once knowing that Griswald is not sleepy or Austin is innocent.
If all people are not cautious or not blue-eyed, then Hunter is not generous.
Someone who is both not sleepy and not generous is always not cautious.
Justin is blue-eyed if and only if Hunter is generous.
If someone is not blue-eyed and sleepy, then he is beige, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Vicki is sleepy and Keegan is not innocent once knowing that Randolph is generous.
If Vicki is blue-eyed, then Keegan is beige, and vice versa.
Randolph being sleepy is equivalent to Keegan being not beige.
Griswald being not generous or Randolph being not cautious implies that Griswald is beige.
If someone is sleepy or he is not innocent, then he is cautious.
Vicki is not innocent if and only if Vicki is not beige. | Justin is generous. | contradiction |
Griswald is not sleepy.
Randolph is sleepy.
Hunter is innocent.
Justin is blue-eyed.
Hunter is generous.
Randolph is not cautious.
Vicki is sleepy.
Randolph is blue-eyed.
Griswald is not blue-eyed.
Justin is sleepy.
Justin is cautious.
Randolph is innocent.If there is someone who is not sleepy, then Justin is not generous.
It can be concluded that Justin is not cautious once knowing that Griswald is not sleepy or Austin is innocent.
If all people are not cautious or not blue-eyed, then Hunter is not generous.
Someone who is both not sleepy and not generous is always not cautious.
Justin is blue-eyed if and only if Hunter is generous.
If someone is not blue-eyed and sleepy, then he is beige, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Vicki is sleepy and Keegan is not innocent once knowing that Randolph is generous.
If Vicki is blue-eyed, then Keegan is beige, and vice versa.
Randolph being sleepy is equivalent to Keegan being not beige.
Griswald being not generous or Randolph being not cautious implies that Griswald is beige.
If someone is sleepy or he is not innocent, then he is cautious.
Vicki is not innocent if and only if Vicki is not beige. | Griswald is cautious. | entailment |
Griswald is not sleepy.
Randolph is sleepy.
Hunter is innocent.
Justin is blue-eyed.
Hunter is generous.
Randolph is not cautious.
Vicki is sleepy.
Randolph is blue-eyed.
Griswald is not blue-eyed.
Justin is sleepy.
Justin is cautious.
Randolph is innocent.If there is someone who is not sleepy, then Justin is not generous.
It can be concluded that Justin is not cautious once knowing that Griswald is not sleepy or Austin is innocent.
If all people are not cautious or not blue-eyed, then Hunter is not generous.
Someone who is both not sleepy and not generous is always not cautious.
Justin is blue-eyed if and only if Hunter is generous.
If someone is not blue-eyed and sleepy, then he is beige, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Vicki is sleepy and Keegan is not innocent once knowing that Randolph is generous.
If Vicki is blue-eyed, then Keegan is beige, and vice versa.
Randolph being sleepy is equivalent to Keegan being not beige.
Griswald being not generous or Randolph being not cautious implies that Griswald is beige.
If someone is sleepy or he is not innocent, then he is cautious.
Vicki is not innocent if and only if Vicki is not beige. | Griswald is not cautious. | contradiction |
Griswald is not sleepy.
Randolph is sleepy.
Hunter is innocent.
Justin is blue-eyed.
Hunter is generous.
Randolph is not cautious.
Vicki is sleepy.
Randolph is blue-eyed.
Griswald is not blue-eyed.
Justin is sleepy.
Justin is cautious.
Randolph is innocent.If there is someone who is not sleepy, then Justin is not generous.
It can be concluded that Justin is not cautious once knowing that Griswald is not sleepy or Austin is innocent.
If all people are not cautious or not blue-eyed, then Hunter is not generous.
Someone who is both not sleepy and not generous is always not cautious.
Justin is blue-eyed if and only if Hunter is generous.
If someone is not blue-eyed and sleepy, then he is beige, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Vicki is sleepy and Keegan is not innocent once knowing that Randolph is generous.
If Vicki is blue-eyed, then Keegan is beige, and vice versa.
Randolph being sleepy is equivalent to Keegan being not beige.
Griswald being not generous or Randolph being not cautious implies that Griswald is beige.
If someone is sleepy or he is not innocent, then he is cautious.
Vicki is not innocent if and only if Vicki is not beige. | Hunter is not cautious. | neutral |
Griswald is not sleepy.
Randolph is sleepy.
Hunter is innocent.
Justin is blue-eyed.
Hunter is generous.
Randolph is not cautious.
Vicki is sleepy.
Randolph is blue-eyed.
Griswald is not blue-eyed.
Justin is sleepy.
Justin is cautious.
Randolph is innocent.If there is someone who is not sleepy, then Justin is not generous.
It can be concluded that Justin is not cautious once knowing that Griswald is not sleepy or Austin is innocent.
If all people are not cautious or not blue-eyed, then Hunter is not generous.
Someone who is both not sleepy and not generous is always not cautious.
Justin is blue-eyed if and only if Hunter is generous.
If someone is not blue-eyed and sleepy, then he is beige, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Vicki is sleepy and Keegan is not innocent once knowing that Randolph is generous.
If Vicki is blue-eyed, then Keegan is beige, and vice versa.
Randolph being sleepy is equivalent to Keegan being not beige.
Griswald being not generous or Randolph being not cautious implies that Griswald is beige.
If someone is sleepy or he is not innocent, then he is cautious.
Vicki is not innocent if and only if Vicki is not beige. | Randolph is not cautious. | self_contradiction |
Griswald is not sleepy.
Randolph is sleepy.
Hunter is innocent.
Justin is blue-eyed.
Hunter is generous.
Randolph is not cautious.
Vicki is sleepy.
Randolph is blue-eyed.
Griswald is not blue-eyed.
Justin is sleepy.
Justin is cautious.
Randolph is innocent.If there is someone who is not sleepy, then Justin is not generous.
It can be concluded that Justin is not cautious once knowing that Griswald is not sleepy or Austin is innocent.
If all people are not cautious or not blue-eyed, then Hunter is not generous.
Someone who is both not sleepy and not generous is always not cautious.
Justin is blue-eyed if and only if Hunter is generous.
If someone is not blue-eyed and sleepy, then he is beige, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Vicki is sleepy and Keegan is not innocent once knowing that Randolph is generous.
If Vicki is blue-eyed, then Keegan is beige, and vice versa.
Randolph being sleepy is equivalent to Keegan being not beige.
Griswald being not generous or Randolph being not cautious implies that Griswald is beige.
If someone is sleepy or he is not innocent, then he is cautious.
Vicki is not innocent if and only if Vicki is not beige. | Keegan is not beige. | entailment |
Stella is not cute.
Stella is not friendly.
Kathryn is petite.
Kathryn is adorable.
Brian is not petite.
Brian is ancient.
Humphrey is not ashamed.
Stella is not petite.
Brian is cute.
Aiken is ashamed.
Aiken is ancient.
Kent is friendly.Brian being not adorable or Kathryn being not friendly implies that Pierce is ancient.
If there is someone who is both ashamed and not cute, then Humphrey is ancient.
If someone is ancient or he is not petite, then he is friendly.
Someone is adorable and ashamed if and only if he is petite.
If someone is not ashamed or petite, then he is not friendly.
All ashamed people are cute.
If someone is not ashamed or not adorable, then he is petite.
As long as someone is not cute, he is ashamed and not adorable.
If there is someone who is adorable, then Kathryn is not ashamed.
If there is at least one people who is either cute or not ashamed, then Kathryn is ancient and Kathryn is not friendly.
Brian being not petite or Brian being cute implies that Kent is not ancient.
If Kathryn is not cute, then Kathryn is adorable and Aiken is not ancient. | Brian is cute. | entailment |
Stella is not cute.
Stella is not friendly.
Kathryn is petite.
Kathryn is adorable.
Brian is not petite.
Brian is ancient.
Humphrey is not ashamed.
Stella is not petite.
Brian is cute.
Aiken is ashamed.
Aiken is ancient.
Kent is friendly.Brian being not adorable or Kathryn being not friendly implies that Pierce is ancient.
If there is someone who is both ashamed and not cute, then Humphrey is ancient.
If someone is ancient or he is not petite, then he is friendly.
Someone is adorable and ashamed if and only if he is petite.
If someone is not ashamed or petite, then he is not friendly.
All ashamed people are cute.
If someone is not ashamed or not adorable, then he is petite.
As long as someone is not cute, he is ashamed and not adorable.
If there is someone who is adorable, then Kathryn is not ashamed.
If there is at least one people who is either cute or not ashamed, then Kathryn is ancient and Kathryn is not friendly.
Brian being not petite or Brian being cute implies that Kent is not ancient.
If Kathryn is not cute, then Kathryn is adorable and Aiken is not ancient. | Stella is not ancient. | neutral |
Stella is not cute.
Stella is not friendly.
Kathryn is petite.
Kathryn is adorable.
Brian is not petite.
Brian is ancient.
Humphrey is not ashamed.
Stella is not petite.
Brian is cute.
Aiken is ashamed.
Aiken is ancient.
Kent is friendly.Brian being not adorable or Kathryn being not friendly implies that Pierce is ancient.
If there is someone who is both ashamed and not cute, then Humphrey is ancient.
If someone is ancient or he is not petite, then he is friendly.
Someone is adorable and ashamed if and only if he is petite.
If someone is not ashamed or petite, then he is not friendly.
All ashamed people are cute.
If someone is not ashamed or not adorable, then he is petite.
As long as someone is not cute, he is ashamed and not adorable.
If there is someone who is adorable, then Kathryn is not ashamed.
If there is at least one people who is either cute or not ashamed, then Kathryn is ancient and Kathryn is not friendly.
Brian being not petite or Brian being cute implies that Kent is not ancient.
If Kathryn is not cute, then Kathryn is adorable and Aiken is not ancient. | Kent is ancient. | contradiction |
Stella is not cute.
Stella is not friendly.
Kathryn is petite.
Kathryn is adorable.
Brian is not petite.
Brian is ancient.
Humphrey is not ashamed.
Stella is not petite.
Brian is cute.
Aiken is ashamed.
Aiken is ancient.
Kent is friendly.Brian being not adorable or Kathryn being not friendly implies that Pierce is ancient.
If there is someone who is both ashamed and not cute, then Humphrey is ancient.
If someone is ancient or he is not petite, then he is friendly.
Someone is adorable and ashamed if and only if he is petite.
If someone is not ashamed or petite, then he is not friendly.
All ashamed people are cute.
If someone is not ashamed or not adorable, then he is petite.
As long as someone is not cute, he is ashamed and not adorable.
If there is someone who is adorable, then Kathryn is not ashamed.
If there is at least one people who is either cute or not ashamed, then Kathryn is ancient and Kathryn is not friendly.
Brian being not petite or Brian being cute implies that Kent is not ancient.
If Kathryn is not cute, then Kathryn is adorable and Aiken is not ancient. | Kent is cute. | neutral |
Stella is not cute.
Stella is not friendly.
Kathryn is petite.
Kathryn is adorable.
Brian is not petite.
Brian is ancient.
Humphrey is not ashamed.
Stella is not petite.
Brian is cute.
Aiken is ashamed.
Aiken is ancient.
Kent is friendly.Brian being not adorable or Kathryn being not friendly implies that Pierce is ancient.
If there is someone who is both ashamed and not cute, then Humphrey is ancient.
If someone is ancient or he is not petite, then he is friendly.
Someone is adorable and ashamed if and only if he is petite.
If someone is not ashamed or petite, then he is not friendly.
All ashamed people are cute.
If someone is not ashamed or not adorable, then he is petite.
As long as someone is not cute, he is ashamed and not adorable.
If there is someone who is adorable, then Kathryn is not ashamed.
If there is at least one people who is either cute or not ashamed, then Kathryn is ancient and Kathryn is not friendly.
Brian being not petite or Brian being cute implies that Kent is not ancient.
If Kathryn is not cute, then Kathryn is adorable and Aiken is not ancient. | Kent is not ashamed. | neutral |
Stella is not cute.
Stella is not friendly.
Kathryn is petite.
Kathryn is adorable.
Brian is not petite.
Brian is ancient.
Humphrey is not ashamed.
Stella is not petite.
Brian is cute.
Aiken is ashamed.
Aiken is ancient.
Kent is friendly.Brian being not adorable or Kathryn being not friendly implies that Pierce is ancient.
If there is someone who is both ashamed and not cute, then Humphrey is ancient.
If someone is ancient or he is not petite, then he is friendly.
Someone is adorable and ashamed if and only if he is petite.
If someone is not ashamed or petite, then he is not friendly.
All ashamed people are cute.
If someone is not ashamed or not adorable, then he is petite.
As long as someone is not cute, he is ashamed and not adorable.
If there is someone who is adorable, then Kathryn is not ashamed.
If there is at least one people who is either cute or not ashamed, then Kathryn is ancient and Kathryn is not friendly.
Brian being not petite or Brian being cute implies that Kent is not ancient.
If Kathryn is not cute, then Kathryn is adorable and Aiken is not ancient. | Kent is adorable. | neutral |
Stella is not cute.
Stella is not friendly.
Kathryn is petite.
Kathryn is adorable.
Brian is not petite.
Brian is ancient.
Humphrey is not ashamed.
Stella is not petite.
Brian is cute.
Aiken is ashamed.
Aiken is ancient.
Kent is friendly.Brian being not adorable or Kathryn being not friendly implies that Pierce is ancient.
If there is someone who is both ashamed and not cute, then Humphrey is ancient.
If someone is ancient or he is not petite, then he is friendly.
Someone is adorable and ashamed if and only if he is petite.
If someone is not ashamed or petite, then he is not friendly.
All ashamed people are cute.
If someone is not ashamed or not adorable, then he is petite.
As long as someone is not cute, he is ashamed and not adorable.
If there is someone who is adorable, then Kathryn is not ashamed.
If there is at least one people who is either cute or not ashamed, then Kathryn is ancient and Kathryn is not friendly.
Brian being not petite or Brian being cute implies that Kent is not ancient.
If Kathryn is not cute, then Kathryn is adorable and Aiken is not ancient. | Aiken is cute. | entailment |
Stella is not cute.
Stella is not friendly.
Kathryn is petite.
Kathryn is adorable.
Brian is not petite.
Brian is ancient.
Humphrey is not ashamed.
Stella is not petite.
Brian is cute.
Aiken is ashamed.
Aiken is ancient.
Kent is friendly.Brian being not adorable or Kathryn being not friendly implies that Pierce is ancient.
If there is someone who is both ashamed and not cute, then Humphrey is ancient.
If someone is ancient or he is not petite, then he is friendly.
Someone is adorable and ashamed if and only if he is petite.
If someone is not ashamed or petite, then he is not friendly.
All ashamed people are cute.
If someone is not ashamed or not adorable, then he is petite.
As long as someone is not cute, he is ashamed and not adorable.
If there is someone who is adorable, then Kathryn is not ashamed.
If there is at least one people who is either cute or not ashamed, then Kathryn is ancient and Kathryn is not friendly.
Brian being not petite or Brian being cute implies that Kent is not ancient.
If Kathryn is not cute, then Kathryn is adorable and Aiken is not ancient. | Stella is not ashamed. | contradiction |
Stella is not cute.
Stella is not friendly.
Kathryn is petite.
Kathryn is adorable.
Brian is not petite.
Brian is ancient.
Humphrey is not ashamed.
Stella is not petite.
Brian is cute.
Aiken is ashamed.
Aiken is ancient.
Kent is friendly.Brian being not adorable or Kathryn being not friendly implies that Pierce is ancient.
If there is someone who is both ashamed and not cute, then Humphrey is ancient.
If someone is ancient or he is not petite, then he is friendly.
Someone is adorable and ashamed if and only if he is petite.
If someone is not ashamed or petite, then he is not friendly.
All ashamed people are cute.
If someone is not ashamed or not adorable, then he is petite.
As long as someone is not cute, he is ashamed and not adorable.
If there is someone who is adorable, then Kathryn is not ashamed.
If there is at least one people who is either cute or not ashamed, then Kathryn is ancient and Kathryn is not friendly.
Brian being not petite or Brian being cute implies that Kent is not ancient.
If Kathryn is not cute, then Kathryn is adorable and Aiken is not ancient. | Brian is not ancient. | contradiction |
Stella is not cute.
Stella is not friendly.
Kathryn is petite.
Kathryn is adorable.
Brian is not petite.
Brian is ancient.
Humphrey is not ashamed.
Stella is not petite.
Brian is cute.
Aiken is ashamed.
Aiken is ancient.
Kent is friendly.Brian being not adorable or Kathryn being not friendly implies that Pierce is ancient.
If there is someone who is both ashamed and not cute, then Humphrey is ancient.
If someone is ancient or he is not petite, then he is friendly.
Someone is adorable and ashamed if and only if he is petite.
If someone is not ashamed or petite, then he is not friendly.
All ashamed people are cute.
If someone is not ashamed or not adorable, then he is petite.
As long as someone is not cute, he is ashamed and not adorable.
If there is someone who is adorable, then Kathryn is not ashamed.
If there is at least one people who is either cute or not ashamed, then Kathryn is ancient and Kathryn is not friendly.
Brian being not petite or Brian being cute implies that Kent is not ancient.
If Kathryn is not cute, then Kathryn is adorable and Aiken is not ancient. | Aiken is adorable. | neutral |
Stella is not cute.
Stella is not friendly.
Kathryn is petite.
Kathryn is adorable.
Brian is not petite.
Brian is ancient.
Humphrey is not ashamed.
Stella is not petite.
Brian is cute.
Aiken is ashamed.
Aiken is ancient.
Kent is friendly.Brian being not adorable or Kathryn being not friendly implies that Pierce is ancient.
If there is someone who is both ashamed and not cute, then Humphrey is ancient.
If someone is ancient or he is not petite, then he is friendly.
Someone is adorable and ashamed if and only if he is petite.
If someone is not ashamed or petite, then he is not friendly.
All ashamed people are cute.
If someone is not ashamed or not adorable, then he is petite.
As long as someone is not cute, he is ashamed and not adorable.
If there is someone who is adorable, then Kathryn is not ashamed.
If there is at least one people who is either cute or not ashamed, then Kathryn is ancient and Kathryn is not friendly.
Brian being not petite or Brian being cute implies that Kent is not ancient.
If Kathryn is not cute, then Kathryn is adorable and Aiken is not ancient. | Stella is not adorable. | self_contradiction |
Stella is not cute.
Stella is not friendly.
Kathryn is petite.
Kathryn is adorable.
Brian is not petite.
Brian is ancient.
Humphrey is not ashamed.
Stella is not petite.
Brian is cute.
Aiken is ashamed.
Aiken is ancient.
Kent is friendly.Brian being not adorable or Kathryn being not friendly implies that Pierce is ancient.
If there is someone who is both ashamed and not cute, then Humphrey is ancient.
If someone is ancient or he is not petite, then he is friendly.
Someone is adorable and ashamed if and only if he is petite.
If someone is not ashamed or petite, then he is not friendly.
All ashamed people are cute.
If someone is not ashamed or not adorable, then he is petite.
As long as someone is not cute, he is ashamed and not adorable.
If there is someone who is adorable, then Kathryn is not ashamed.
If there is at least one people who is either cute or not ashamed, then Kathryn is ancient and Kathryn is not friendly.
Brian being not petite or Brian being cute implies that Kent is not ancient.
If Kathryn is not cute, then Kathryn is adorable and Aiken is not ancient. | Kathryn is not ashamed. | self_contradiction |
Stella is not cute.
Stella is not friendly.
Kathryn is petite.
Kathryn is adorable.
Brian is not petite.
Brian is ancient.
Humphrey is not ashamed.
Stella is not petite.
Brian is cute.
Aiken is ashamed.
Aiken is ancient.
Kent is friendly.Brian being not adorable or Kathryn being not friendly implies that Pierce is ancient.
If there is someone who is both ashamed and not cute, then Humphrey is ancient.
If someone is ancient or he is not petite, then he is friendly.
Someone is adorable and ashamed if and only if he is petite.
If someone is not ashamed or petite, then he is not friendly.
All ashamed people are cute.
If someone is not ashamed or not adorable, then he is petite.
As long as someone is not cute, he is ashamed and not adorable.
If there is someone who is adorable, then Kathryn is not ashamed.
If there is at least one people who is either cute or not ashamed, then Kathryn is ancient and Kathryn is not friendly.
Brian being not petite or Brian being cute implies that Kent is not ancient.
If Kathryn is not cute, then Kathryn is adorable and Aiken is not ancient. | Humphrey is not friendly. | entailment |
Stella is not cute.
Stella is not friendly.
Kathryn is petite.
Kathryn is adorable.
Brian is not petite.
Brian is ancient.
Humphrey is not ashamed.
Stella is not petite.
Brian is cute.
Aiken is ashamed.
Aiken is ancient.
Kent is friendly.Brian being not adorable or Kathryn being not friendly implies that Pierce is ancient.
If there is someone who is both ashamed and not cute, then Humphrey is ancient.
If someone is ancient or he is not petite, then he is friendly.
Someone is adorable and ashamed if and only if he is petite.
If someone is not ashamed or petite, then he is not friendly.
All ashamed people are cute.
If someone is not ashamed or not adorable, then he is petite.
As long as someone is not cute, he is ashamed and not adorable.
If there is someone who is adorable, then Kathryn is not ashamed.
If there is at least one people who is either cute or not ashamed, then Kathryn is ancient and Kathryn is not friendly.
Brian being not petite or Brian being cute implies that Kent is not ancient.
If Kathryn is not cute, then Kathryn is adorable and Aiken is not ancient. | Kathryn is ashamed. | self_contradiction |
Stella is not cute.
Stella is not friendly.
Kathryn is petite.
Kathryn is adorable.
Brian is not petite.
Brian is ancient.
Humphrey is not ashamed.
Stella is not petite.
Brian is cute.
Aiken is ashamed.
Aiken is ancient.
Kent is friendly.Brian being not adorable or Kathryn being not friendly implies that Pierce is ancient.
If there is someone who is both ashamed and not cute, then Humphrey is ancient.
If someone is ancient or he is not petite, then he is friendly.
Someone is adorable and ashamed if and only if he is petite.
If someone is not ashamed or petite, then he is not friendly.
All ashamed people are cute.
If someone is not ashamed or not adorable, then he is petite.
As long as someone is not cute, he is ashamed and not adorable.
If there is someone who is adorable, then Kathryn is not ashamed.
If there is at least one people who is either cute or not ashamed, then Kathryn is ancient and Kathryn is not friendly.
Brian being not petite or Brian being cute implies that Kent is not ancient.
If Kathryn is not cute, then Kathryn is adorable and Aiken is not ancient. | Aiken is not ashamed. | contradiction |
Stella is not cute.
Stella is not friendly.
Kathryn is petite.
Kathryn is adorable.
Brian is not petite.
Brian is ancient.
Humphrey is not ashamed.
Stella is not petite.
Brian is cute.
Aiken is ashamed.
Aiken is ancient.
Kent is friendly.Brian being not adorable or Kathryn being not friendly implies that Pierce is ancient.
If there is someone who is both ashamed and not cute, then Humphrey is ancient.
If someone is ancient or he is not petite, then he is friendly.
Someone is adorable and ashamed if and only if he is petite.
If someone is not ashamed or petite, then he is not friendly.
All ashamed people are cute.
If someone is not ashamed or not adorable, then he is petite.
As long as someone is not cute, he is ashamed and not adorable.
If there is someone who is adorable, then Kathryn is not ashamed.
If there is at least one people who is either cute or not ashamed, then Kathryn is ancient and Kathryn is not friendly.
Brian being not petite or Brian being cute implies that Kent is not ancient.
If Kathryn is not cute, then Kathryn is adorable and Aiken is not ancient. | Stella is friendly. | self_contradiction |
Stella is not cute.
Stella is not friendly.
Kathryn is petite.
Kathryn is adorable.
Brian is not petite.
Brian is ancient.
Humphrey is not ashamed.
Stella is not petite.
Brian is cute.
Aiken is ashamed.
Aiken is ancient.
Kent is friendly.Brian being not adorable or Kathryn being not friendly implies that Pierce is ancient.
If there is someone who is both ashamed and not cute, then Humphrey is ancient.
If someone is ancient or he is not petite, then he is friendly.
Someone is adorable and ashamed if and only if he is petite.
If someone is not ashamed or petite, then he is not friendly.
All ashamed people are cute.
If someone is not ashamed or not adorable, then he is petite.
As long as someone is not cute, he is ashamed and not adorable.
If there is someone who is adorable, then Kathryn is not ashamed.
If there is at least one people who is either cute or not ashamed, then Kathryn is ancient and Kathryn is not friendly.
Brian being not petite or Brian being cute implies that Kent is not ancient.
If Kathryn is not cute, then Kathryn is adorable and Aiken is not ancient. | Aiken is ashamed. | entailment |
Stella is not cute.
Stella is not friendly.
Kathryn is petite.
Kathryn is adorable.
Brian is not petite.
Brian is ancient.
Humphrey is not ashamed.
Stella is not petite.
Brian is cute.
Aiken is ashamed.
Aiken is ancient.
Kent is friendly.Brian being not adorable or Kathryn being not friendly implies that Pierce is ancient.
If there is someone who is both ashamed and not cute, then Humphrey is ancient.
If someone is ancient or he is not petite, then he is friendly.
Someone is adorable and ashamed if and only if he is petite.
If someone is not ashamed or petite, then he is not friendly.
All ashamed people are cute.
If someone is not ashamed or not adorable, then he is petite.
As long as someone is not cute, he is ashamed and not adorable.
If there is someone who is adorable, then Kathryn is not ashamed.
If there is at least one people who is either cute or not ashamed, then Kathryn is ancient and Kathryn is not friendly.
Brian being not petite or Brian being cute implies that Kent is not ancient.
If Kathryn is not cute, then Kathryn is adorable and Aiken is not ancient. | Humphrey is adorable. | entailment |
Stella is not cute.
Stella is not friendly.
Kathryn is petite.
Kathryn is adorable.
Brian is not petite.
Brian is ancient.
Humphrey is not ashamed.
Stella is not petite.
Brian is cute.
Aiken is ashamed.
Aiken is ancient.
Kent is friendly.Brian being not adorable or Kathryn being not friendly implies that Pierce is ancient.
If there is someone who is both ashamed and not cute, then Humphrey is ancient.
If someone is ancient or he is not petite, then he is friendly.
Someone is adorable and ashamed if and only if he is petite.
If someone is not ashamed or petite, then he is not friendly.
All ashamed people are cute.
If someone is not ashamed or not adorable, then he is petite.
As long as someone is not cute, he is ashamed and not adorable.
If there is someone who is adorable, then Kathryn is not ashamed.
If there is at least one people who is either cute or not ashamed, then Kathryn is ancient and Kathryn is not friendly.
Brian being not petite or Brian being cute implies that Kent is not ancient.
If Kathryn is not cute, then Kathryn is adorable and Aiken is not ancient. | Stella is not friendly. | self_contradiction |
Stella is not cute.
Stella is not friendly.
Kathryn is petite.
Kathryn is adorable.
Brian is not petite.
Brian is ancient.
Humphrey is not ashamed.
Stella is not petite.
Brian is cute.
Aiken is ashamed.
Aiken is ancient.
Kent is friendly.Brian being not adorable or Kathryn being not friendly implies that Pierce is ancient.
If there is someone who is both ashamed and not cute, then Humphrey is ancient.
If someone is ancient or he is not petite, then he is friendly.
Someone is adorable and ashamed if and only if he is petite.
If someone is not ashamed or petite, then he is not friendly.
All ashamed people are cute.
If someone is not ashamed or not adorable, then he is petite.
As long as someone is not cute, he is ashamed and not adorable.
If there is someone who is adorable, then Kathryn is not ashamed.
If there is at least one people who is either cute or not ashamed, then Kathryn is ancient and Kathryn is not friendly.
Brian being not petite or Brian being cute implies that Kent is not ancient.
If Kathryn is not cute, then Kathryn is adorable and Aiken is not ancient. | Kathryn is not petite. | contradiction |
Kane is not famous.
Igor is not available.
Claudia is available.
Douglas is not available.
Benton is not available.
Douglas is not famous.
Benton is famous.
Claudia is brave.
Igor is smart.
Bruno is not available.
Bruno is not wet.
Kane is not available.If Kayla is not wet, then Douglas is not famous.
if there is at least one people who is available and not brave, then Benton is not smart and Kayla is not famous.
If Bruno is not famous and Benton is not available, then Kane is not nice.
If there is at least one people who is both not available and not wet, then Douglas is not nice.
If everyone is not wet or not smart, then Bruno is not brave.
If Benton is not brave, then Douglas is smart.
If Bruno is available, then Bruno is not famous and Claudia is nice, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor smart or not available is always wet.
It can be concluded that Igor is not available and Douglas is not wet once knowing that Claudia is not brave.
Someone being both not nice and not smart is equivalent to being not available.
If there is someone who is either not nice or not available, then Douglas is smart.
Someone who is both brave and not nice is always famous. | Bruno is not nice. | entailment |
Kane is not famous.
Igor is not available.
Claudia is available.
Douglas is not available.
Benton is not available.
Douglas is not famous.
Benton is famous.
Claudia is brave.
Igor is smart.
Bruno is not available.
Bruno is not wet.
Kane is not available.If Kayla is not wet, then Douglas is not famous.
if there is at least one people who is available and not brave, then Benton is not smart and Kayla is not famous.
If Bruno is not famous and Benton is not available, then Kane is not nice.
If there is at least one people who is both not available and not wet, then Douglas is not nice.
If everyone is not wet or not smart, then Bruno is not brave.
If Benton is not brave, then Douglas is smart.
If Bruno is available, then Bruno is not famous and Claudia is nice, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor smart or not available is always wet.
It can be concluded that Igor is not available and Douglas is not wet once knowing that Claudia is not brave.
Someone being both not nice and not smart is equivalent to being not available.
If there is someone who is either not nice or not available, then Douglas is smart.
Someone who is both brave and not nice is always famous. | Igor is not smart. | self_contradiction |
Kane is not famous.
Igor is not available.
Claudia is available.
Douglas is not available.
Benton is not available.
Douglas is not famous.
Benton is famous.
Claudia is brave.
Igor is smart.
Bruno is not available.
Bruno is not wet.
Kane is not available.If Kayla is not wet, then Douglas is not famous.
if there is at least one people who is available and not brave, then Benton is not smart and Kayla is not famous.
If Bruno is not famous and Benton is not available, then Kane is not nice.
If there is at least one people who is both not available and not wet, then Douglas is not nice.
If everyone is not wet or not smart, then Bruno is not brave.
If Benton is not brave, then Douglas is smart.
If Bruno is available, then Bruno is not famous and Claudia is nice, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor smart or not available is always wet.
It can be concluded that Igor is not available and Douglas is not wet once knowing that Claudia is not brave.
Someone being both not nice and not smart is equivalent to being not available.
If there is someone who is either not nice or not available, then Douglas is smart.
Someone who is both brave and not nice is always famous. | Benton is not wet. | contradiction |
Kane is not famous.
Igor is not available.
Claudia is available.
Douglas is not available.
Benton is not available.
Douglas is not famous.
Benton is famous.
Claudia is brave.
Igor is smart.
Bruno is not available.
Bruno is not wet.
Kane is not available.If Kayla is not wet, then Douglas is not famous.
if there is at least one people who is available and not brave, then Benton is not smart and Kayla is not famous.
If Bruno is not famous and Benton is not available, then Kane is not nice.
If there is at least one people who is both not available and not wet, then Douglas is not nice.
If everyone is not wet or not smart, then Bruno is not brave.
If Benton is not brave, then Douglas is smart.
If Bruno is available, then Bruno is not famous and Claudia is nice, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor smart or not available is always wet.
It can be concluded that Igor is not available and Douglas is not wet once knowing that Claudia is not brave.
Someone being both not nice and not smart is equivalent to being not available.
If there is someone who is either not nice or not available, then Douglas is smart.
Someone who is both brave and not nice is always famous. | Igor is smart. | self_contradiction |
Kane is not famous.
Igor is not available.
Claudia is available.
Douglas is not available.
Benton is not available.
Douglas is not famous.
Benton is famous.
Claudia is brave.
Igor is smart.
Bruno is not available.
Bruno is not wet.
Kane is not available.If Kayla is not wet, then Douglas is not famous.
if there is at least one people who is available and not brave, then Benton is not smart and Kayla is not famous.
If Bruno is not famous and Benton is not available, then Kane is not nice.
If there is at least one people who is both not available and not wet, then Douglas is not nice.
If everyone is not wet or not smart, then Bruno is not brave.
If Benton is not brave, then Douglas is smart.
If Bruno is available, then Bruno is not famous and Claudia is nice, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor smart or not available is always wet.
It can be concluded that Igor is not available and Douglas is not wet once knowing that Claudia is not brave.
Someone being both not nice and not smart is equivalent to being not available.
If there is someone who is either not nice or not available, then Douglas is smart.
Someone who is both brave and not nice is always famous. | Igor is not available. | entailment |
Kane is not famous.
Igor is not available.
Claudia is available.
Douglas is not available.
Benton is not available.
Douglas is not famous.
Benton is famous.
Claudia is brave.
Igor is smart.
Bruno is not available.
Bruno is not wet.
Kane is not available.If Kayla is not wet, then Douglas is not famous.
if there is at least one people who is available and not brave, then Benton is not smart and Kayla is not famous.
If Bruno is not famous and Benton is not available, then Kane is not nice.
If there is at least one people who is both not available and not wet, then Douglas is not nice.
If everyone is not wet or not smart, then Bruno is not brave.
If Benton is not brave, then Douglas is smart.
If Bruno is available, then Bruno is not famous and Claudia is nice, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor smart or not available is always wet.
It can be concluded that Igor is not available and Douglas is not wet once knowing that Claudia is not brave.
Someone being both not nice and not smart is equivalent to being not available.
If there is someone who is either not nice or not available, then Douglas is smart.
Someone who is both brave and not nice is always famous. | Bruno is brave. | neutral |
Kane is not famous.
Igor is not available.
Claudia is available.
Douglas is not available.
Benton is not available.
Douglas is not famous.
Benton is famous.
Claudia is brave.
Igor is smart.
Bruno is not available.
Bruno is not wet.
Kane is not available.If Kayla is not wet, then Douglas is not famous.
if there is at least one people who is available and not brave, then Benton is not smart and Kayla is not famous.
If Bruno is not famous and Benton is not available, then Kane is not nice.
If there is at least one people who is both not available and not wet, then Douglas is not nice.
If everyone is not wet or not smart, then Bruno is not brave.
If Benton is not brave, then Douglas is smart.
If Bruno is available, then Bruno is not famous and Claudia is nice, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor smart or not available is always wet.
It can be concluded that Igor is not available and Douglas is not wet once knowing that Claudia is not brave.
Someone being both not nice and not smart is equivalent to being not available.
If there is someone who is either not nice or not available, then Douglas is smart.
Someone who is both brave and not nice is always famous. | Benton is available. | contradiction |
Kane is not famous.
Igor is not available.
Claudia is available.
Douglas is not available.
Benton is not available.
Douglas is not famous.
Benton is famous.
Claudia is brave.
Igor is smart.
Bruno is not available.
Bruno is not wet.
Kane is not available.If Kayla is not wet, then Douglas is not famous.
if there is at least one people who is available and not brave, then Benton is not smart and Kayla is not famous.
If Bruno is not famous and Benton is not available, then Kane is not nice.
If there is at least one people who is both not available and not wet, then Douglas is not nice.
If everyone is not wet or not smart, then Bruno is not brave.
If Benton is not brave, then Douglas is smart.
If Bruno is available, then Bruno is not famous and Claudia is nice, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor smart or not available is always wet.
It can be concluded that Igor is not available and Douglas is not wet once knowing that Claudia is not brave.
Someone being both not nice and not smart is equivalent to being not available.
If there is someone who is either not nice or not available, then Douglas is smart.
Someone who is both brave and not nice is always famous. | Kane is brave. | neutral |
Kane is not famous.
Igor is not available.
Claudia is available.
Douglas is not available.
Benton is not available.
Douglas is not famous.
Benton is famous.
Claudia is brave.
Igor is smart.
Bruno is not available.
Bruno is not wet.
Kane is not available.If Kayla is not wet, then Douglas is not famous.
if there is at least one people who is available and not brave, then Benton is not smart and Kayla is not famous.
If Bruno is not famous and Benton is not available, then Kane is not nice.
If there is at least one people who is both not available and not wet, then Douglas is not nice.
If everyone is not wet or not smart, then Bruno is not brave.
If Benton is not brave, then Douglas is smart.
If Bruno is available, then Bruno is not famous and Claudia is nice, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor smart or not available is always wet.
It can be concluded that Igor is not available and Douglas is not wet once knowing that Claudia is not brave.
Someone being both not nice and not smart is equivalent to being not available.
If there is someone who is either not nice or not available, then Douglas is smart.
Someone who is both brave and not nice is always famous. | Douglas is not famous. | entailment |
Kane is not famous.
Igor is not available.
Claudia is available.
Douglas is not available.
Benton is not available.
Douglas is not famous.
Benton is famous.
Claudia is brave.
Igor is smart.
Bruno is not available.
Bruno is not wet.
Kane is not available.If Kayla is not wet, then Douglas is not famous.
if there is at least one people who is available and not brave, then Benton is not smart and Kayla is not famous.
If Bruno is not famous and Benton is not available, then Kane is not nice.
If there is at least one people who is both not available and not wet, then Douglas is not nice.
If everyone is not wet or not smart, then Bruno is not brave.
If Benton is not brave, then Douglas is smart.
If Bruno is available, then Bruno is not famous and Claudia is nice, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor smart or not available is always wet.
It can be concluded that Igor is not available and Douglas is not wet once knowing that Claudia is not brave.
Someone being both not nice and not smart is equivalent to being not available.
If there is someone who is either not nice or not available, then Douglas is smart.
Someone who is both brave and not nice is always famous. | Bruno is not wet. | self_contradiction |
Kane is not famous.
Igor is not available.
Claudia is available.
Douglas is not available.
Benton is not available.
Douglas is not famous.
Benton is famous.
Claudia is brave.
Igor is smart.
Bruno is not available.
Bruno is not wet.
Kane is not available.If Kayla is not wet, then Douglas is not famous.
if there is at least one people who is available and not brave, then Benton is not smart and Kayla is not famous.
If Bruno is not famous and Benton is not available, then Kane is not nice.
If there is at least one people who is both not available and not wet, then Douglas is not nice.
If everyone is not wet or not smart, then Bruno is not brave.
If Benton is not brave, then Douglas is smart.
If Bruno is available, then Bruno is not famous and Claudia is nice, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor smart or not available is always wet.
It can be concluded that Igor is not available and Douglas is not wet once knowing that Claudia is not brave.
Someone being both not nice and not smart is equivalent to being not available.
If there is someone who is either not nice or not available, then Douglas is smart.
Someone who is both brave and not nice is always famous. | Kane is not famous. | entailment |
Kane is not famous.
Igor is not available.
Claudia is available.
Douglas is not available.
Benton is not available.
Douglas is not famous.
Benton is famous.
Claudia is brave.
Igor is smart.
Bruno is not available.
Bruno is not wet.
Kane is not available.If Kayla is not wet, then Douglas is not famous.
if there is at least one people who is available and not brave, then Benton is not smart and Kayla is not famous.
If Bruno is not famous and Benton is not available, then Kane is not nice.
If there is at least one people who is both not available and not wet, then Douglas is not nice.
If everyone is not wet or not smart, then Bruno is not brave.
If Benton is not brave, then Douglas is smart.
If Bruno is available, then Bruno is not famous and Claudia is nice, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor smart or not available is always wet.
It can be concluded that Igor is not available and Douglas is not wet once knowing that Claudia is not brave.
Someone being both not nice and not smart is equivalent to being not available.
If there is someone who is either not nice or not available, then Douglas is smart.
Someone who is both brave and not nice is always famous. | Benton is not brave. | neutral |
Kane is not famous.
Igor is not available.
Claudia is available.
Douglas is not available.
Benton is not available.
Douglas is not famous.
Benton is famous.
Claudia is brave.
Igor is smart.
Bruno is not available.
Bruno is not wet.
Kane is not available.If Kayla is not wet, then Douglas is not famous.
if there is at least one people who is available and not brave, then Benton is not smart and Kayla is not famous.
If Bruno is not famous and Benton is not available, then Kane is not nice.
If there is at least one people who is both not available and not wet, then Douglas is not nice.
If everyone is not wet or not smart, then Bruno is not brave.
If Benton is not brave, then Douglas is smart.
If Bruno is available, then Bruno is not famous and Claudia is nice, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor smart or not available is always wet.
It can be concluded that Igor is not available and Douglas is not wet once knowing that Claudia is not brave.
Someone being both not nice and not smart is equivalent to being not available.
If there is someone who is either not nice or not available, then Douglas is smart.
Someone who is both brave and not nice is always famous. | Douglas is smart. | self_contradiction |
Kane is not famous.
Igor is not available.
Claudia is available.
Douglas is not available.
Benton is not available.
Douglas is not famous.
Benton is famous.
Claudia is brave.
Igor is smart.
Bruno is not available.
Bruno is not wet.
Kane is not available.If Kayla is not wet, then Douglas is not famous.
if there is at least one people who is available and not brave, then Benton is not smart and Kayla is not famous.
If Bruno is not famous and Benton is not available, then Kane is not nice.
If there is at least one people who is both not available and not wet, then Douglas is not nice.
If everyone is not wet or not smart, then Bruno is not brave.
If Benton is not brave, then Douglas is smart.
If Bruno is available, then Bruno is not famous and Claudia is nice, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor smart or not available is always wet.
It can be concluded that Igor is not available and Douglas is not wet once knowing that Claudia is not brave.
Someone being both not nice and not smart is equivalent to being not available.
If there is someone who is either not nice or not available, then Douglas is smart.
Someone who is both brave and not nice is always famous. | Kane is available. | contradiction |
Kane is not famous.
Igor is not available.
Claudia is available.
Douglas is not available.
Benton is not available.
Douglas is not famous.
Benton is famous.
Claudia is brave.
Igor is smart.
Bruno is not available.
Bruno is not wet.
Kane is not available.If Kayla is not wet, then Douglas is not famous.
if there is at least one people who is available and not brave, then Benton is not smart and Kayla is not famous.
If Bruno is not famous and Benton is not available, then Kane is not nice.
If there is at least one people who is both not available and not wet, then Douglas is not nice.
If everyone is not wet or not smart, then Bruno is not brave.
If Benton is not brave, then Douglas is smart.
If Bruno is available, then Bruno is not famous and Claudia is nice, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor smart or not available is always wet.
It can be concluded that Igor is not available and Douglas is not wet once knowing that Claudia is not brave.
Someone being both not nice and not smart is equivalent to being not available.
If there is someone who is either not nice or not available, then Douglas is smart.
Someone who is both brave and not nice is always famous. | Benton is not famous. | contradiction |
Kane is not famous.
Igor is not available.
Claudia is available.
Douglas is not available.
Benton is not available.
Douglas is not famous.
Benton is famous.
Claudia is brave.
Igor is smart.
Bruno is not available.
Bruno is not wet.
Kane is not available.If Kayla is not wet, then Douglas is not famous.
if there is at least one people who is available and not brave, then Benton is not smart and Kayla is not famous.
If Bruno is not famous and Benton is not available, then Kane is not nice.
If there is at least one people who is both not available and not wet, then Douglas is not nice.
If everyone is not wet or not smart, then Bruno is not brave.
If Benton is not brave, then Douglas is smart.
If Bruno is available, then Bruno is not famous and Claudia is nice, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor smart or not available is always wet.
It can be concluded that Igor is not available and Douglas is not wet once knowing that Claudia is not brave.
Someone being both not nice and not smart is equivalent to being not available.
If there is someone who is either not nice or not available, then Douglas is smart.
Someone who is both brave and not nice is always famous. | Douglas is not smart. | self_contradiction |
Kane is not famous.
Igor is not available.
Claudia is available.
Douglas is not available.
Benton is not available.
Douglas is not famous.
Benton is famous.
Claudia is brave.
Igor is smart.
Bruno is not available.
Bruno is not wet.
Kane is not available.If Kayla is not wet, then Douglas is not famous.
if there is at least one people who is available and not brave, then Benton is not smart and Kayla is not famous.
If Bruno is not famous and Benton is not available, then Kane is not nice.
If there is at least one people who is both not available and not wet, then Douglas is not nice.
If everyone is not wet or not smart, then Bruno is not brave.
If Benton is not brave, then Douglas is smart.
If Bruno is available, then Bruno is not famous and Claudia is nice, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor smart or not available is always wet.
It can be concluded that Igor is not available and Douglas is not wet once knowing that Claudia is not brave.
Someone being both not nice and not smart is equivalent to being not available.
If there is someone who is either not nice or not available, then Douglas is smart.
Someone who is both brave and not nice is always famous. | Benton is not smart. | entailment |
Kane is not famous.
Igor is not available.
Claudia is available.
Douglas is not available.
Benton is not available.
Douglas is not famous.
Benton is famous.
Claudia is brave.
Igor is smart.
Bruno is not available.
Bruno is not wet.
Kane is not available.If Kayla is not wet, then Douglas is not famous.
if there is at least one people who is available and not brave, then Benton is not smart and Kayla is not famous.
If Bruno is not famous and Benton is not available, then Kane is not nice.
If there is at least one people who is both not available and not wet, then Douglas is not nice.
If everyone is not wet or not smart, then Bruno is not brave.
If Benton is not brave, then Douglas is smart.
If Bruno is available, then Bruno is not famous and Claudia is nice, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor smart or not available is always wet.
It can be concluded that Igor is not available and Douglas is not wet once knowing that Claudia is not brave.
Someone being both not nice and not smart is equivalent to being not available.
If there is someone who is either not nice or not available, then Douglas is smart.
Someone who is both brave and not nice is always famous. | Douglas is available. | contradiction |
Kane is not famous.
Igor is not available.
Claudia is available.
Douglas is not available.
Benton is not available.
Douglas is not famous.
Benton is famous.
Claudia is brave.
Igor is smart.
Bruno is not available.
Bruno is not wet.
Kane is not available.If Kayla is not wet, then Douglas is not famous.
if there is at least one people who is available and not brave, then Benton is not smart and Kayla is not famous.
If Bruno is not famous and Benton is not available, then Kane is not nice.
If there is at least one people who is both not available and not wet, then Douglas is not nice.
If everyone is not wet or not smart, then Bruno is not brave.
If Benton is not brave, then Douglas is smart.
If Bruno is available, then Bruno is not famous and Claudia is nice, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor smart or not available is always wet.
It can be concluded that Igor is not available and Douglas is not wet once knowing that Claudia is not brave.
Someone being both not nice and not smart is equivalent to being not available.
If there is someone who is either not nice or not available, then Douglas is smart.
Someone who is both brave and not nice is always famous. | Douglas is not brave. | neutral |
Kane is not famous.
Igor is not available.
Claudia is available.
Douglas is not available.
Benton is not available.
Douglas is not famous.
Benton is famous.
Claudia is brave.
Igor is smart.
Bruno is not available.
Bruno is not wet.
Kane is not available.If Kayla is not wet, then Douglas is not famous.
if there is at least one people who is available and not brave, then Benton is not smart and Kayla is not famous.
If Bruno is not famous and Benton is not available, then Kane is not nice.
If there is at least one people who is both not available and not wet, then Douglas is not nice.
If everyone is not wet or not smart, then Bruno is not brave.
If Benton is not brave, then Douglas is smart.
If Bruno is available, then Bruno is not famous and Claudia is nice, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor smart or not available is always wet.
It can be concluded that Igor is not available and Douglas is not wet once knowing that Claudia is not brave.
Someone being both not nice and not smart is equivalent to being not available.
If there is someone who is either not nice or not available, then Douglas is smart.
Someone who is both brave and not nice is always famous. | Benton is brave. | neutral |
John is not lucky.
Chandler is united.
Kianna is united.
Hope is worried.
John is not united.
Douglas is alive.
John is worried.
John is alive.
Hope is wandering.
Kianna is worried.
Bethany is wandering.
John is comprehensive.If Kianna is not comprehensive, then Hope is alive and Bethany is worried.
If someone is both not comprehensive and not united, then he is worried.
If John is united, then Douglas is not worried.
If there is at least one people who is worried, then Hope is comprehensive.
Someone who is wandering is always not united.
Someone who is not worried is always both not united and wandering.
Someone who is alive is always both not worried and not comprehensive.
Douglas is comprehensive and John is wandering if and only if John is not united and Adrian is not lucky.
Kianna is not alive if and only if Douglas is not lucky and Kianna is wandering.
Someone who is both alive and not comprehensive is always worried.
If there is at least one people who is both united and not lucky, then Kianna is not alive.
John being not alive is equivalent to Hope being not united. | Adrian is united. | neutral |
John is not lucky.
Chandler is united.
Kianna is united.
Hope is worried.
John is not united.
Douglas is alive.
John is worried.
John is alive.
Hope is wandering.
Kianna is worried.
Bethany is wandering.
John is comprehensive.If Kianna is not comprehensive, then Hope is alive and Bethany is worried.
If someone is both not comprehensive and not united, then he is worried.
If John is united, then Douglas is not worried.
If there is at least one people who is worried, then Hope is comprehensive.
Someone who is wandering is always not united.
Someone who is not worried is always both not united and wandering.
Someone who is alive is always both not worried and not comprehensive.
Douglas is comprehensive and John is wandering if and only if John is not united and Adrian is not lucky.
Kianna is not alive if and only if Douglas is not lucky and Kianna is wandering.
Someone who is both alive and not comprehensive is always worried.
If there is at least one people who is both united and not lucky, then Kianna is not alive.
John being not alive is equivalent to Hope being not united. | John is alive. | self_contradiction |
John is not lucky.
Chandler is united.
Kianna is united.
Hope is worried.
John is not united.
Douglas is alive.
John is worried.
John is alive.
Hope is wandering.
Kianna is worried.
Bethany is wandering.
John is comprehensive.If Kianna is not comprehensive, then Hope is alive and Bethany is worried.
If someone is both not comprehensive and not united, then he is worried.
If John is united, then Douglas is not worried.
If there is at least one people who is worried, then Hope is comprehensive.
Someone who is wandering is always not united.
Someone who is not worried is always both not united and wandering.
Someone who is alive is always both not worried and not comprehensive.
Douglas is comprehensive and John is wandering if and only if John is not united and Adrian is not lucky.
Kianna is not alive if and only if Douglas is not lucky and Kianna is wandering.
Someone who is both alive and not comprehensive is always worried.
If there is at least one people who is both united and not lucky, then Kianna is not alive.
John being not alive is equivalent to Hope being not united. | Douglas is not worried. | self_contradiction |
John is not lucky.
Chandler is united.
Kianna is united.
Hope is worried.
John is not united.
Douglas is alive.
John is worried.
John is alive.
Hope is wandering.
Kianna is worried.
Bethany is wandering.
John is comprehensive.If Kianna is not comprehensive, then Hope is alive and Bethany is worried.
If someone is both not comprehensive and not united, then he is worried.
If John is united, then Douglas is not worried.
If there is at least one people who is worried, then Hope is comprehensive.
Someone who is wandering is always not united.
Someone who is not worried is always both not united and wandering.
Someone who is alive is always both not worried and not comprehensive.
Douglas is comprehensive and John is wandering if and only if John is not united and Adrian is not lucky.
Kianna is not alive if and only if Douglas is not lucky and Kianna is wandering.
Someone who is both alive and not comprehensive is always worried.
If there is at least one people who is both united and not lucky, then Kianna is not alive.
John being not alive is equivalent to Hope being not united. | Douglas is not united. | entailment |
John is not lucky.
Chandler is united.
Kianna is united.
Hope is worried.
John is not united.
Douglas is alive.
John is worried.
John is alive.
Hope is wandering.
Kianna is worried.
Bethany is wandering.
John is comprehensive.If Kianna is not comprehensive, then Hope is alive and Bethany is worried.
If someone is both not comprehensive and not united, then he is worried.
If John is united, then Douglas is not worried.
If there is at least one people who is worried, then Hope is comprehensive.
Someone who is wandering is always not united.
Someone who is not worried is always both not united and wandering.
Someone who is alive is always both not worried and not comprehensive.
Douglas is comprehensive and John is wandering if and only if John is not united and Adrian is not lucky.
Kianna is not alive if and only if Douglas is not lucky and Kianna is wandering.
Someone who is both alive and not comprehensive is always worried.
If there is at least one people who is both united and not lucky, then Kianna is not alive.
John being not alive is equivalent to Hope being not united. | Douglas is comprehensive. | contradiction |
John is not lucky.
Chandler is united.
Kianna is united.
Hope is worried.
John is not united.
Douglas is alive.
John is worried.
John is alive.
Hope is wandering.
Kianna is worried.
Bethany is wandering.
John is comprehensive.If Kianna is not comprehensive, then Hope is alive and Bethany is worried.
If someone is both not comprehensive and not united, then he is worried.
If John is united, then Douglas is not worried.
If there is at least one people who is worried, then Hope is comprehensive.
Someone who is wandering is always not united.
Someone who is not worried is always both not united and wandering.
Someone who is alive is always both not worried and not comprehensive.
Douglas is comprehensive and John is wandering if and only if John is not united and Adrian is not lucky.
Kianna is not alive if and only if Douglas is not lucky and Kianna is wandering.
Someone who is both alive and not comprehensive is always worried.
If there is at least one people who is both united and not lucky, then Kianna is not alive.
John being not alive is equivalent to Hope being not united. | Kianna is not united. | contradiction |
John is not lucky.
Chandler is united.
Kianna is united.
Hope is worried.
John is not united.
Douglas is alive.
John is worried.
John is alive.
Hope is wandering.
Kianna is worried.
Bethany is wandering.
John is comprehensive.If Kianna is not comprehensive, then Hope is alive and Bethany is worried.
If someone is both not comprehensive and not united, then he is worried.
If John is united, then Douglas is not worried.
If there is at least one people who is worried, then Hope is comprehensive.
Someone who is wandering is always not united.
Someone who is not worried is always both not united and wandering.
Someone who is alive is always both not worried and not comprehensive.
Douglas is comprehensive and John is wandering if and only if John is not united and Adrian is not lucky.
Kianna is not alive if and only if Douglas is not lucky and Kianna is wandering.
Someone who is both alive and not comprehensive is always worried.
If there is at least one people who is both united and not lucky, then Kianna is not alive.
John being not alive is equivalent to Hope being not united. | John is not alive. | self_contradiction |
John is not lucky.
Chandler is united.
Kianna is united.
Hope is worried.
John is not united.
Douglas is alive.
John is worried.
John is alive.
Hope is wandering.
Kianna is worried.
Bethany is wandering.
John is comprehensive.If Kianna is not comprehensive, then Hope is alive and Bethany is worried.
If someone is both not comprehensive and not united, then he is worried.
If John is united, then Douglas is not worried.
If there is at least one people who is worried, then Hope is comprehensive.
Someone who is wandering is always not united.
Someone who is not worried is always both not united and wandering.
Someone who is alive is always both not worried and not comprehensive.
Douglas is comprehensive and John is wandering if and only if John is not united and Adrian is not lucky.
Kianna is not alive if and only if Douglas is not lucky and Kianna is wandering.
Someone who is both alive and not comprehensive is always worried.
If there is at least one people who is both united and not lucky, then Kianna is not alive.
John being not alive is equivalent to Hope being not united. | Douglas is united. | contradiction |
John is not lucky.
Chandler is united.
Kianna is united.
Hope is worried.
John is not united.
Douglas is alive.
John is worried.
John is alive.
Hope is wandering.
Kianna is worried.
Bethany is wandering.
John is comprehensive.If Kianna is not comprehensive, then Hope is alive and Bethany is worried.
If someone is both not comprehensive and not united, then he is worried.
If John is united, then Douglas is not worried.
If there is at least one people who is worried, then Hope is comprehensive.
Someone who is wandering is always not united.
Someone who is not worried is always both not united and wandering.
Someone who is alive is always both not worried and not comprehensive.
Douglas is comprehensive and John is wandering if and only if John is not united and Adrian is not lucky.
Kianna is not alive if and only if Douglas is not lucky and Kianna is wandering.
Someone who is both alive and not comprehensive is always worried.
If there is at least one people who is both united and not lucky, then Kianna is not alive.
John being not alive is equivalent to Hope being not united. | John is not worried. | self_contradiction |
John is not lucky.
Chandler is united.
Kianna is united.
Hope is worried.
John is not united.
Douglas is alive.
John is worried.
John is alive.
Hope is wandering.
Kianna is worried.
Bethany is wandering.
John is comprehensive.If Kianna is not comprehensive, then Hope is alive and Bethany is worried.
If someone is both not comprehensive and not united, then he is worried.
If John is united, then Douglas is not worried.
If there is at least one people who is worried, then Hope is comprehensive.
Someone who is wandering is always not united.
Someone who is not worried is always both not united and wandering.
Someone who is alive is always both not worried and not comprehensive.
Douglas is comprehensive and John is wandering if and only if John is not united and Adrian is not lucky.
Kianna is not alive if and only if Douglas is not lucky and Kianna is wandering.
Someone who is both alive and not comprehensive is always worried.
If there is at least one people who is both united and not lucky, then Kianna is not alive.
John being not alive is equivalent to Hope being not united. | Douglas is worried. | self_contradiction |
John is not lucky.
Chandler is united.
Kianna is united.
Hope is worried.
John is not united.
Douglas is alive.
John is worried.
John is alive.
Hope is wandering.
Kianna is worried.
Bethany is wandering.
John is comprehensive.If Kianna is not comprehensive, then Hope is alive and Bethany is worried.
If someone is both not comprehensive and not united, then he is worried.
If John is united, then Douglas is not worried.
If there is at least one people who is worried, then Hope is comprehensive.
Someone who is wandering is always not united.
Someone who is not worried is always both not united and wandering.
Someone who is alive is always both not worried and not comprehensive.
Douglas is comprehensive and John is wandering if and only if John is not united and Adrian is not lucky.
Kianna is not alive if and only if Douglas is not lucky and Kianna is wandering.
Someone who is both alive and not comprehensive is always worried.
If there is at least one people who is both united and not lucky, then Kianna is not alive.
John being not alive is equivalent to Hope being not united. | Adrian is not comprehensive. | neutral |
John is not lucky.
Chandler is united.
Kianna is united.
Hope is worried.
John is not united.
Douglas is alive.
John is worried.
John is alive.
Hope is wandering.
Kianna is worried.
Bethany is wandering.
John is comprehensive.If Kianna is not comprehensive, then Hope is alive and Bethany is worried.
If someone is both not comprehensive and not united, then he is worried.
If John is united, then Douglas is not worried.
If there is at least one people who is worried, then Hope is comprehensive.
Someone who is wandering is always not united.
Someone who is not worried is always both not united and wandering.
Someone who is alive is always both not worried and not comprehensive.
Douglas is comprehensive and John is wandering if and only if John is not united and Adrian is not lucky.
Kianna is not alive if and only if Douglas is not lucky and Kianna is wandering.
Someone who is both alive and not comprehensive is always worried.
If there is at least one people who is both united and not lucky, then Kianna is not alive.
John being not alive is equivalent to Hope being not united. | Chandler is not comprehensive. | neutral |
John is not lucky.
Chandler is united.
Kianna is united.
Hope is worried.
John is not united.
Douglas is alive.
John is worried.
John is alive.
Hope is wandering.
Kianna is worried.
Bethany is wandering.
John is comprehensive.If Kianna is not comprehensive, then Hope is alive and Bethany is worried.
If someone is both not comprehensive and not united, then he is worried.
If John is united, then Douglas is not worried.
If there is at least one people who is worried, then Hope is comprehensive.
Someone who is wandering is always not united.
Someone who is not worried is always both not united and wandering.
Someone who is alive is always both not worried and not comprehensive.
Douglas is comprehensive and John is wandering if and only if John is not united and Adrian is not lucky.
Kianna is not alive if and only if Douglas is not lucky and Kianna is wandering.
Someone who is both alive and not comprehensive is always worried.
If there is at least one people who is both united and not lucky, then Kianna is not alive.
John being not alive is equivalent to Hope being not united. | Bethany is united. | contradiction |
John is not lucky.
Chandler is united.
Kianna is united.
Hope is worried.
John is not united.
Douglas is alive.
John is worried.
John is alive.
Hope is wandering.
Kianna is worried.
Bethany is wandering.
John is comprehensive.If Kianna is not comprehensive, then Hope is alive and Bethany is worried.
If someone is both not comprehensive and not united, then he is worried.
If John is united, then Douglas is not worried.
If there is at least one people who is worried, then Hope is comprehensive.
Someone who is wandering is always not united.
Someone who is not worried is always both not united and wandering.
Someone who is alive is always both not worried and not comprehensive.
Douglas is comprehensive and John is wandering if and only if John is not united and Adrian is not lucky.
Kianna is not alive if and only if Douglas is not lucky and Kianna is wandering.
Someone who is both alive and not comprehensive is always worried.
If there is at least one people who is both united and not lucky, then Kianna is not alive.
John being not alive is equivalent to Hope being not united. | Douglas is wandering. | entailment |
John is not lucky.
Chandler is united.
Kianna is united.
Hope is worried.
John is not united.
Douglas is alive.
John is worried.
John is alive.
Hope is wandering.
Kianna is worried.
Bethany is wandering.
John is comprehensive.If Kianna is not comprehensive, then Hope is alive and Bethany is worried.
If someone is both not comprehensive and not united, then he is worried.
If John is united, then Douglas is not worried.
If there is at least one people who is worried, then Hope is comprehensive.
Someone who is wandering is always not united.
Someone who is not worried is always both not united and wandering.
Someone who is alive is always both not worried and not comprehensive.
Douglas is comprehensive and John is wandering if and only if John is not united and Adrian is not lucky.
Kianna is not alive if and only if Douglas is not lucky and Kianna is wandering.
Someone who is both alive and not comprehensive is always worried.
If there is at least one people who is both united and not lucky, then Kianna is not alive.
John being not alive is equivalent to Hope being not united. | Hope is not worried. | contradiction |
John is not lucky.
Chandler is united.
Kianna is united.
Hope is worried.
John is not united.
Douglas is alive.
John is worried.
John is alive.
Hope is wandering.
Kianna is worried.
Bethany is wandering.
John is comprehensive.If Kianna is not comprehensive, then Hope is alive and Bethany is worried.
If someone is both not comprehensive and not united, then he is worried.
If John is united, then Douglas is not worried.
If there is at least one people who is worried, then Hope is comprehensive.
Someone who is wandering is always not united.
Someone who is not worried is always both not united and wandering.
Someone who is alive is always both not worried and not comprehensive.
Douglas is comprehensive and John is wandering if and only if John is not united and Adrian is not lucky.
Kianna is not alive if and only if Douglas is not lucky and Kianna is wandering.
Someone who is both alive and not comprehensive is always worried.
If there is at least one people who is both united and not lucky, then Kianna is not alive.
John being not alive is equivalent to Hope being not united. | Kianna is worried. | entailment |
John is not lucky.
Chandler is united.
Kianna is united.
Hope is worried.
John is not united.
Douglas is alive.
John is worried.
John is alive.
Hope is wandering.
Kianna is worried.
Bethany is wandering.
John is comprehensive.If Kianna is not comprehensive, then Hope is alive and Bethany is worried.
If someone is both not comprehensive and not united, then he is worried.
If John is united, then Douglas is not worried.
If there is at least one people who is worried, then Hope is comprehensive.
Someone who is wandering is always not united.
Someone who is not worried is always both not united and wandering.
Someone who is alive is always both not worried and not comprehensive.
Douglas is comprehensive and John is wandering if and only if John is not united and Adrian is not lucky.
Kianna is not alive if and only if Douglas is not lucky and Kianna is wandering.
Someone who is both alive and not comprehensive is always worried.
If there is at least one people who is both united and not lucky, then Kianna is not alive.
John being not alive is equivalent to Hope being not united. | John is not united. | entailment |
John is not lucky.
Chandler is united.
Kianna is united.
Hope is worried.
John is not united.
Douglas is alive.
John is worried.
John is alive.
Hope is wandering.
Kianna is worried.
Bethany is wandering.
John is comprehensive.If Kianna is not comprehensive, then Hope is alive and Bethany is worried.
If someone is both not comprehensive and not united, then he is worried.
If John is united, then Douglas is not worried.
If there is at least one people who is worried, then Hope is comprehensive.
Someone who is wandering is always not united.
Someone who is not worried is always both not united and wandering.
Someone who is alive is always both not worried and not comprehensive.
Douglas is comprehensive and John is wandering if and only if John is not united and Adrian is not lucky.
Kianna is not alive if and only if Douglas is not lucky and Kianna is wandering.
Someone who is both alive and not comprehensive is always worried.
If there is at least one people who is both united and not lucky, then Kianna is not alive.
John being not alive is equivalent to Hope being not united. | Kianna is not comprehensive. | neutral |
John is not lucky.
Chandler is united.
Kianna is united.
Hope is worried.
John is not united.
Douglas is alive.
John is worried.
John is alive.
Hope is wandering.
Kianna is worried.
Bethany is wandering.
John is comprehensive.If Kianna is not comprehensive, then Hope is alive and Bethany is worried.
If someone is both not comprehensive and not united, then he is worried.
If John is united, then Douglas is not worried.
If there is at least one people who is worried, then Hope is comprehensive.
Someone who is wandering is always not united.
Someone who is not worried is always both not united and wandering.
Someone who is alive is always both not worried and not comprehensive.
Douglas is comprehensive and John is wandering if and only if John is not united and Adrian is not lucky.
Kianna is not alive if and only if Douglas is not lucky and Kianna is wandering.
Someone who is both alive and not comprehensive is always worried.
If there is at least one people who is both united and not lucky, then Kianna is not alive.
John being not alive is equivalent to Hope being not united. | Chandler is not wandering. | neutral |
John is not lucky.
Chandler is united.
Kianna is united.
Hope is worried.
John is not united.
Douglas is alive.
John is worried.
John is alive.
Hope is wandering.
Kianna is worried.
Bethany is wandering.
John is comprehensive.If Kianna is not comprehensive, then Hope is alive and Bethany is worried.
If someone is both not comprehensive and not united, then he is worried.
If John is united, then Douglas is not worried.
If there is at least one people who is worried, then Hope is comprehensive.
Someone who is wandering is always not united.
Someone who is not worried is always both not united and wandering.
Someone who is alive is always both not worried and not comprehensive.
Douglas is comprehensive and John is wandering if and only if John is not united and Adrian is not lucky.
Kianna is not alive if and only if Douglas is not lucky and Kianna is wandering.
Someone who is both alive and not comprehensive is always worried.
If there is at least one people who is both united and not lucky, then Kianna is not alive.
John being not alive is equivalent to Hope being not united. | Hope is not united. | entailment |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.