premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Bryant is competitive.
Bryant is psychological.
Renfred is critical.
Bryant is rainy.
Vera is competitive.
Sherwin is not critical.
Renfred is not rainy.
Renfred is not quiet.
Caleb is not critical.
Caleb is ugly.
Bruce is critical.
Bryant is not ugly.Sherwin being not rainy is equivalent to Renfred being not quiet and Caleb being not critical.
Bryant being competitive implies that Caleb is psychological.
Someone being both competitive and not critical is equivalent to being ugly and not psychological.
Bruce being rainy or Bruce being quiet implies that Bryant is psychological.
Someone who is competitive or quiet is always not rainy and ugly.
If there is at least one people who is quiet, then Neil is not ugly.
If there is at least one people who is quiet or critical, then Neil is not psychological.
As long as someone is not quiet, he is ugly and not critical.
All not ugly people are not critical.
If there is someone who is both not psychological and quiet, then Vera is rainy.
If there is someone who is both psychological and competitive, then Sherwin is not ugly.
Someone being both psychological and quiet is equivalent to being not rainy. | Vera is not psychological. | contradiction |
Bryant is competitive.
Bryant is psychological.
Renfred is critical.
Bryant is rainy.
Vera is competitive.
Sherwin is not critical.
Renfred is not rainy.
Renfred is not quiet.
Caleb is not critical.
Caleb is ugly.
Bruce is critical.
Bryant is not ugly.Sherwin being not rainy is equivalent to Renfred being not quiet and Caleb being not critical.
Bryant being competitive implies that Caleb is psychological.
Someone being both competitive and not critical is equivalent to being ugly and not psychological.
Bruce being rainy or Bruce being quiet implies that Bryant is psychological.
Someone who is competitive or quiet is always not rainy and ugly.
If there is at least one people who is quiet, then Neil is not ugly.
If there is at least one people who is quiet or critical, then Neil is not psychological.
As long as someone is not quiet, he is ugly and not critical.
All not ugly people are not critical.
If there is someone who is both not psychological and quiet, then Vera is rainy.
If there is someone who is both psychological and competitive, then Sherwin is not ugly.
Someone being both psychological and quiet is equivalent to being not rainy. | Bruce is rainy. | neutral |
Bryant is competitive.
Bryant is psychological.
Renfred is critical.
Bryant is rainy.
Vera is competitive.
Sherwin is not critical.
Renfred is not rainy.
Renfred is not quiet.
Caleb is not critical.
Caleb is ugly.
Bruce is critical.
Bryant is not ugly.Sherwin being not rainy is equivalent to Renfred being not quiet and Caleb being not critical.
Bryant being competitive implies that Caleb is psychological.
Someone being both competitive and not critical is equivalent to being ugly and not psychological.
Bruce being rainy or Bruce being quiet implies that Bryant is psychological.
Someone who is competitive or quiet is always not rainy and ugly.
If there is at least one people who is quiet, then Neil is not ugly.
If there is at least one people who is quiet or critical, then Neil is not psychological.
As long as someone is not quiet, he is ugly and not critical.
All not ugly people are not critical.
If there is someone who is both not psychological and quiet, then Vera is rainy.
If there is someone who is both psychological and competitive, then Sherwin is not ugly.
Someone being both psychological and quiet is equivalent to being not rainy. | Caleb is not ugly. | contradiction |
Bryant is competitive.
Bryant is psychological.
Renfred is critical.
Bryant is rainy.
Vera is competitive.
Sherwin is not critical.
Renfred is not rainy.
Renfred is not quiet.
Caleb is not critical.
Caleb is ugly.
Bruce is critical.
Bryant is not ugly.Sherwin being not rainy is equivalent to Renfred being not quiet and Caleb being not critical.
Bryant being competitive implies that Caleb is psychological.
Someone being both competitive and not critical is equivalent to being ugly and not psychological.
Bruce being rainy or Bruce being quiet implies that Bryant is psychological.
Someone who is competitive or quiet is always not rainy and ugly.
If there is at least one people who is quiet, then Neil is not ugly.
If there is at least one people who is quiet or critical, then Neil is not psychological.
As long as someone is not quiet, he is ugly and not critical.
All not ugly people are not critical.
If there is someone who is both not psychological and quiet, then Vera is rainy.
If there is someone who is both psychological and competitive, then Sherwin is not ugly.
Someone being both psychological and quiet is equivalent to being not rainy. | Bryant is not ugly. | self_contradiction |
Bryant is competitive.
Bryant is psychological.
Renfred is critical.
Bryant is rainy.
Vera is competitive.
Sherwin is not critical.
Renfred is not rainy.
Renfred is not quiet.
Caleb is not critical.
Caleb is ugly.
Bruce is critical.
Bryant is not ugly.Sherwin being not rainy is equivalent to Renfred being not quiet and Caleb being not critical.
Bryant being competitive implies that Caleb is psychological.
Someone being both competitive and not critical is equivalent to being ugly and not psychological.
Bruce being rainy or Bruce being quiet implies that Bryant is psychological.
Someone who is competitive or quiet is always not rainy and ugly.
If there is at least one people who is quiet, then Neil is not ugly.
If there is at least one people who is quiet or critical, then Neil is not psychological.
As long as someone is not quiet, he is ugly and not critical.
All not ugly people are not critical.
If there is someone who is both not psychological and quiet, then Vera is rainy.
If there is someone who is both psychological and competitive, then Sherwin is not ugly.
Someone being both psychological and quiet is equivalent to being not rainy. | Bryant is critical. | contradiction |
Bryant is competitive.
Bryant is psychological.
Renfred is critical.
Bryant is rainy.
Vera is competitive.
Sherwin is not critical.
Renfred is not rainy.
Renfred is not quiet.
Caleb is not critical.
Caleb is ugly.
Bruce is critical.
Bryant is not ugly.Sherwin being not rainy is equivalent to Renfred being not quiet and Caleb being not critical.
Bryant being competitive implies that Caleb is psychological.
Someone being both competitive and not critical is equivalent to being ugly and not psychological.
Bruce being rainy or Bruce being quiet implies that Bryant is psychological.
Someone who is competitive or quiet is always not rainy and ugly.
If there is at least one people who is quiet, then Neil is not ugly.
If there is at least one people who is quiet or critical, then Neil is not psychological.
As long as someone is not quiet, he is ugly and not critical.
All not ugly people are not critical.
If there is someone who is both not psychological and quiet, then Vera is rainy.
If there is someone who is both psychological and competitive, then Sherwin is not ugly.
Someone being both psychological and quiet is equivalent to being not rainy. | Renfred is not psychological. | contradiction |
Bryant is competitive.
Bryant is psychological.
Renfred is critical.
Bryant is rainy.
Vera is competitive.
Sherwin is not critical.
Renfred is not rainy.
Renfred is not quiet.
Caleb is not critical.
Caleb is ugly.
Bruce is critical.
Bryant is not ugly.Sherwin being not rainy is equivalent to Renfred being not quiet and Caleb being not critical.
Bryant being competitive implies that Caleb is psychological.
Someone being both competitive and not critical is equivalent to being ugly and not psychological.
Bruce being rainy or Bruce being quiet implies that Bryant is psychological.
Someone who is competitive or quiet is always not rainy and ugly.
If there is at least one people who is quiet, then Neil is not ugly.
If there is at least one people who is quiet or critical, then Neil is not psychological.
As long as someone is not quiet, he is ugly and not critical.
All not ugly people are not critical.
If there is someone who is both not psychological and quiet, then Vera is rainy.
If there is someone who is both psychological and competitive, then Sherwin is not ugly.
Someone being both psychological and quiet is equivalent to being not rainy. | Neil is not rainy. | neutral |
Bryant is competitive.
Bryant is psychological.
Renfred is critical.
Bryant is rainy.
Vera is competitive.
Sherwin is not critical.
Renfred is not rainy.
Renfred is not quiet.
Caleb is not critical.
Caleb is ugly.
Bruce is critical.
Bryant is not ugly.Sherwin being not rainy is equivalent to Renfred being not quiet and Caleb being not critical.
Bryant being competitive implies that Caleb is psychological.
Someone being both competitive and not critical is equivalent to being ugly and not psychological.
Bruce being rainy or Bruce being quiet implies that Bryant is psychological.
Someone who is competitive or quiet is always not rainy and ugly.
If there is at least one people who is quiet, then Neil is not ugly.
If there is at least one people who is quiet or critical, then Neil is not psychological.
As long as someone is not quiet, he is ugly and not critical.
All not ugly people are not critical.
If there is someone who is both not psychological and quiet, then Vera is rainy.
If there is someone who is both psychological and competitive, then Sherwin is not ugly.
Someone being both psychological and quiet is equivalent to being not rainy. | Bruce is competitive. | neutral |
Bryant is competitive.
Bryant is psychological.
Renfred is critical.
Bryant is rainy.
Vera is competitive.
Sherwin is not critical.
Renfred is not rainy.
Renfred is not quiet.
Caleb is not critical.
Caleb is ugly.
Bruce is critical.
Bryant is not ugly.Sherwin being not rainy is equivalent to Renfred being not quiet and Caleb being not critical.
Bryant being competitive implies that Caleb is psychological.
Someone being both competitive and not critical is equivalent to being ugly and not psychological.
Bruce being rainy or Bruce being quiet implies that Bryant is psychological.
Someone who is competitive or quiet is always not rainy and ugly.
If there is at least one people who is quiet, then Neil is not ugly.
If there is at least one people who is quiet or critical, then Neil is not psychological.
As long as someone is not quiet, he is ugly and not critical.
All not ugly people are not critical.
If there is someone who is both not psychological and quiet, then Vera is rainy.
If there is someone who is both psychological and competitive, then Sherwin is not ugly.
Someone being both psychological and quiet is equivalent to being not rainy. | Bryant is psychological. | self_contradiction |
Bryant is competitive.
Bryant is psychological.
Renfred is critical.
Bryant is rainy.
Vera is competitive.
Sherwin is not critical.
Renfred is not rainy.
Renfred is not quiet.
Caleb is not critical.
Caleb is ugly.
Bruce is critical.
Bryant is not ugly.Sherwin being not rainy is equivalent to Renfred being not quiet and Caleb being not critical.
Bryant being competitive implies that Caleb is psychological.
Someone being both competitive and not critical is equivalent to being ugly and not psychological.
Bruce being rainy or Bruce being quiet implies that Bryant is psychological.
Someone who is competitive or quiet is always not rainy and ugly.
If there is at least one people who is quiet, then Neil is not ugly.
If there is at least one people who is quiet or critical, then Neil is not psychological.
As long as someone is not quiet, he is ugly and not critical.
All not ugly people are not critical.
If there is someone who is both not psychological and quiet, then Vera is rainy.
If there is someone who is both psychological and competitive, then Sherwin is not ugly.
Someone being both psychological and quiet is equivalent to being not rainy. | Vera is psychological. | entailment |
Bryant is competitive.
Bryant is psychological.
Renfred is critical.
Bryant is rainy.
Vera is competitive.
Sherwin is not critical.
Renfred is not rainy.
Renfred is not quiet.
Caleb is not critical.
Caleb is ugly.
Bruce is critical.
Bryant is not ugly.Sherwin being not rainy is equivalent to Renfred being not quiet and Caleb being not critical.
Bryant being competitive implies that Caleb is psychological.
Someone being both competitive and not critical is equivalent to being ugly and not psychological.
Bruce being rainy or Bruce being quiet implies that Bryant is psychological.
Someone who is competitive or quiet is always not rainy and ugly.
If there is at least one people who is quiet, then Neil is not ugly.
If there is at least one people who is quiet or critical, then Neil is not psychological.
As long as someone is not quiet, he is ugly and not critical.
All not ugly people are not critical.
If there is someone who is both not psychological and quiet, then Vera is rainy.
If there is someone who is both psychological and competitive, then Sherwin is not ugly.
Someone being both psychological and quiet is equivalent to being not rainy. | Bryant is quiet. | entailment |
Bryant is competitive.
Bryant is psychological.
Renfred is critical.
Bryant is rainy.
Vera is competitive.
Sherwin is not critical.
Renfred is not rainy.
Renfred is not quiet.
Caleb is not critical.
Caleb is ugly.
Bruce is critical.
Bryant is not ugly.Sherwin being not rainy is equivalent to Renfred being not quiet and Caleb being not critical.
Bryant being competitive implies that Caleb is psychological.
Someone being both competitive and not critical is equivalent to being ugly and not psychological.
Bruce being rainy or Bruce being quiet implies that Bryant is psychological.
Someone who is competitive or quiet is always not rainy and ugly.
If there is at least one people who is quiet, then Neil is not ugly.
If there is at least one people who is quiet or critical, then Neil is not psychological.
As long as someone is not quiet, he is ugly and not critical.
All not ugly people are not critical.
If there is someone who is both not psychological and quiet, then Vera is rainy.
If there is someone who is both psychological and competitive, then Sherwin is not ugly.
Someone being both psychological and quiet is equivalent to being not rainy. | Renfred is not competitive. | neutral |
Bryant is competitive.
Bryant is psychological.
Renfred is critical.
Bryant is rainy.
Vera is competitive.
Sherwin is not critical.
Renfred is not rainy.
Renfred is not quiet.
Caleb is not critical.
Caleb is ugly.
Bruce is critical.
Bryant is not ugly.Sherwin being not rainy is equivalent to Renfred being not quiet and Caleb being not critical.
Bryant being competitive implies that Caleb is psychological.
Someone being both competitive and not critical is equivalent to being ugly and not psychological.
Bruce being rainy or Bruce being quiet implies that Bryant is psychological.
Someone who is competitive or quiet is always not rainy and ugly.
If there is at least one people who is quiet, then Neil is not ugly.
If there is at least one people who is quiet or critical, then Neil is not psychological.
As long as someone is not quiet, he is ugly and not critical.
All not ugly people are not critical.
If there is someone who is both not psychological and quiet, then Vera is rainy.
If there is someone who is both psychological and competitive, then Sherwin is not ugly.
Someone being both psychological and quiet is equivalent to being not rainy. | Bryant is not rainy. | self_contradiction |
Bryant is competitive.
Bryant is psychological.
Renfred is critical.
Bryant is rainy.
Vera is competitive.
Sherwin is not critical.
Renfred is not rainy.
Renfred is not quiet.
Caleb is not critical.
Caleb is ugly.
Bruce is critical.
Bryant is not ugly.Sherwin being not rainy is equivalent to Renfred being not quiet and Caleb being not critical.
Bryant being competitive implies that Caleb is psychological.
Someone being both competitive and not critical is equivalent to being ugly and not psychological.
Bruce being rainy or Bruce being quiet implies that Bryant is psychological.
Someone who is competitive or quiet is always not rainy and ugly.
If there is at least one people who is quiet, then Neil is not ugly.
If there is at least one people who is quiet or critical, then Neil is not psychological.
As long as someone is not quiet, he is ugly and not critical.
All not ugly people are not critical.
If there is someone who is both not psychological and quiet, then Vera is rainy.
If there is someone who is both psychological and competitive, then Sherwin is not ugly.
Someone being both psychological and quiet is equivalent to being not rainy. | Sherwin is ugly. | self_contradiction |
Bryant is competitive.
Bryant is psychological.
Renfred is critical.
Bryant is rainy.
Vera is competitive.
Sherwin is not critical.
Renfred is not rainy.
Renfred is not quiet.
Caleb is not critical.
Caleb is ugly.
Bruce is critical.
Bryant is not ugly.Sherwin being not rainy is equivalent to Renfred being not quiet and Caleb being not critical.
Bryant being competitive implies that Caleb is psychological.
Someone being both competitive and not critical is equivalent to being ugly and not psychological.
Bruce being rainy or Bruce being quiet implies that Bryant is psychological.
Someone who is competitive or quiet is always not rainy and ugly.
If there is at least one people who is quiet, then Neil is not ugly.
If there is at least one people who is quiet or critical, then Neil is not psychological.
As long as someone is not quiet, he is ugly and not critical.
All not ugly people are not critical.
If there is someone who is both not psychological and quiet, then Vera is rainy.
If there is someone who is both psychological and competitive, then Sherwin is not ugly.
Someone being both psychological and quiet is equivalent to being not rainy. | Renfred is ugly. | entailment |
Bryant is competitive.
Bryant is psychological.
Renfred is critical.
Bryant is rainy.
Vera is competitive.
Sherwin is not critical.
Renfred is not rainy.
Renfred is not quiet.
Caleb is not critical.
Caleb is ugly.
Bruce is critical.
Bryant is not ugly.Sherwin being not rainy is equivalent to Renfred being not quiet and Caleb being not critical.
Bryant being competitive implies that Caleb is psychological.
Someone being both competitive and not critical is equivalent to being ugly and not psychological.
Bruce being rainy or Bruce being quiet implies that Bryant is psychological.
Someone who is competitive or quiet is always not rainy and ugly.
If there is at least one people who is quiet, then Neil is not ugly.
If there is at least one people who is quiet or critical, then Neil is not psychological.
As long as someone is not quiet, he is ugly and not critical.
All not ugly people are not critical.
If there is someone who is both not psychological and quiet, then Vera is rainy.
If there is someone who is both psychological and competitive, then Sherwin is not ugly.
Someone being both psychological and quiet is equivalent to being not rainy. | Bruce is not rainy. | neutral |
Bryant is competitive.
Bryant is psychological.
Renfred is critical.
Bryant is rainy.
Vera is competitive.
Sherwin is not critical.
Renfred is not rainy.
Renfred is not quiet.
Caleb is not critical.
Caleb is ugly.
Bruce is critical.
Bryant is not ugly.Sherwin being not rainy is equivalent to Renfred being not quiet and Caleb being not critical.
Bryant being competitive implies that Caleb is psychological.
Someone being both competitive and not critical is equivalent to being ugly and not psychological.
Bruce being rainy or Bruce being quiet implies that Bryant is psychological.
Someone who is competitive or quiet is always not rainy and ugly.
If there is at least one people who is quiet, then Neil is not ugly.
If there is at least one people who is quiet or critical, then Neil is not psychological.
As long as someone is not quiet, he is ugly and not critical.
All not ugly people are not critical.
If there is someone who is both not psychological and quiet, then Vera is rainy.
If there is someone who is both psychological and competitive, then Sherwin is not ugly.
Someone being both psychological and quiet is equivalent to being not rainy. | Sherwin is not critical. | entailment |
Bryant is competitive.
Bryant is psychological.
Renfred is critical.
Bryant is rainy.
Vera is competitive.
Sherwin is not critical.
Renfred is not rainy.
Renfred is not quiet.
Caleb is not critical.
Caleb is ugly.
Bruce is critical.
Bryant is not ugly.Sherwin being not rainy is equivalent to Renfred being not quiet and Caleb being not critical.
Bryant being competitive implies that Caleb is psychological.
Someone being both competitive and not critical is equivalent to being ugly and not psychological.
Bruce being rainy or Bruce being quiet implies that Bryant is psychological.
Someone who is competitive or quiet is always not rainy and ugly.
If there is at least one people who is quiet, then Neil is not ugly.
If there is at least one people who is quiet or critical, then Neil is not psychological.
As long as someone is not quiet, he is ugly and not critical.
All not ugly people are not critical.
If there is someone who is both not psychological and quiet, then Vera is rainy.
If there is someone who is both psychological and competitive, then Sherwin is not ugly.
Someone being both psychological and quiet is equivalent to being not rainy. | Vera is rainy. | contradiction |
Bryant is competitive.
Bryant is psychological.
Renfred is critical.
Bryant is rainy.
Vera is competitive.
Sherwin is not critical.
Renfred is not rainy.
Renfred is not quiet.
Caleb is not critical.
Caleb is ugly.
Bruce is critical.
Bryant is not ugly.Sherwin being not rainy is equivalent to Renfred being not quiet and Caleb being not critical.
Bryant being competitive implies that Caleb is psychological.
Someone being both competitive and not critical is equivalent to being ugly and not psychological.
Bruce being rainy or Bruce being quiet implies that Bryant is psychological.
Someone who is competitive or quiet is always not rainy and ugly.
If there is at least one people who is quiet, then Neil is not ugly.
If there is at least one people who is quiet or critical, then Neil is not psychological.
As long as someone is not quiet, he is ugly and not critical.
All not ugly people are not critical.
If there is someone who is both not psychological and quiet, then Vera is rainy.
If there is someone who is both psychological and competitive, then Sherwin is not ugly.
Someone being both psychological and quiet is equivalent to being not rainy. | Renfred is not critical. | self_contradiction |
Bryant is competitive.
Bryant is psychological.
Renfred is critical.
Bryant is rainy.
Vera is competitive.
Sherwin is not critical.
Renfred is not rainy.
Renfred is not quiet.
Caleb is not critical.
Caleb is ugly.
Bruce is critical.
Bryant is not ugly.Sherwin being not rainy is equivalent to Renfred being not quiet and Caleb being not critical.
Bryant being competitive implies that Caleb is psychological.
Someone being both competitive and not critical is equivalent to being ugly and not psychological.
Bruce being rainy or Bruce being quiet implies that Bryant is psychological.
Someone who is competitive or quiet is always not rainy and ugly.
If there is at least one people who is quiet, then Neil is not ugly.
If there is at least one people who is quiet or critical, then Neil is not psychological.
As long as someone is not quiet, he is ugly and not critical.
All not ugly people are not critical.
If there is someone who is both not psychological and quiet, then Vera is rainy.
If there is someone who is both psychological and competitive, then Sherwin is not ugly.
Someone being both psychological and quiet is equivalent to being not rainy. | Vera is quiet. | entailment |
Pierce is round.
Graham is tense.
Pierce is tense.
Nathalie is puzzled.
Ramsey is not tense.
Ramsey is not massive.
Pierce is not talented.
Ramsey is talented.
Graham is not round.
Tony is talented.
Mila is not round.
Pierce is not plain.If there is someone who is either not round or puzzled, then Graham is not talented.
If someone is not tense and round, then he is both not puzzled and not talented, and vice versa.
If someone is talented or he is round, then he is not puzzled.
Alexander being not tense and Nathalie being not massive imply that Mila is not talented.
If someone is plain or he is tense, then he is not massive.
Tony is massive if and only if Alexander is plain.
If there is at least one people who is both not talented and tense, then Pierce is not puzzled.
If Graham is puzzled, then Tony is round and Ramsey is tense, and vice versa.
Someone being not round is equivalent to being not tense.
Someone who is not tense is always both not talented and not round.
If someone is tense and talented, then he is massive and plain.
If there is at least one people who is tense, then Alexander is round. | Ramsey is tense. | contradiction |
Pierce is round.
Graham is tense.
Pierce is tense.
Nathalie is puzzled.
Ramsey is not tense.
Ramsey is not massive.
Pierce is not talented.
Ramsey is talented.
Graham is not round.
Tony is talented.
Mila is not round.
Pierce is not plain.If there is someone who is either not round or puzzled, then Graham is not talented.
If someone is not tense and round, then he is both not puzzled and not talented, and vice versa.
If someone is talented or he is round, then he is not puzzled.
Alexander being not tense and Nathalie being not massive imply that Mila is not talented.
If someone is plain or he is tense, then he is not massive.
Tony is massive if and only if Alexander is plain.
If there is at least one people who is both not talented and tense, then Pierce is not puzzled.
If Graham is puzzled, then Tony is round and Ramsey is tense, and vice versa.
Someone being not round is equivalent to being not tense.
Someone who is not tense is always both not talented and not round.
If someone is tense and talented, then he is massive and plain.
If there is at least one people who is tense, then Alexander is round. | Mila is round. | contradiction |
Pierce is round.
Graham is tense.
Pierce is tense.
Nathalie is puzzled.
Ramsey is not tense.
Ramsey is not massive.
Pierce is not talented.
Ramsey is talented.
Graham is not round.
Tony is talented.
Mila is not round.
Pierce is not plain.If there is someone who is either not round or puzzled, then Graham is not talented.
If someone is not tense and round, then he is both not puzzled and not talented, and vice versa.
If someone is talented or he is round, then he is not puzzled.
Alexander being not tense and Nathalie being not massive imply that Mila is not talented.
If someone is plain or he is tense, then he is not massive.
Tony is massive if and only if Alexander is plain.
If there is at least one people who is both not talented and tense, then Pierce is not puzzled.
If Graham is puzzled, then Tony is round and Ramsey is tense, and vice versa.
Someone being not round is equivalent to being not tense.
Someone who is not tense is always both not talented and not round.
If someone is tense and talented, then he is massive and plain.
If there is at least one people who is tense, then Alexander is round. | Tony is round. | neutral |
Pierce is round.
Graham is tense.
Pierce is tense.
Nathalie is puzzled.
Ramsey is not tense.
Ramsey is not massive.
Pierce is not talented.
Ramsey is talented.
Graham is not round.
Tony is talented.
Mila is not round.
Pierce is not plain.If there is someone who is either not round or puzzled, then Graham is not talented.
If someone is not tense and round, then he is both not puzzled and not talented, and vice versa.
If someone is talented or he is round, then he is not puzzled.
Alexander being not tense and Nathalie being not massive imply that Mila is not talented.
If someone is plain or he is tense, then he is not massive.
Tony is massive if and only if Alexander is plain.
If there is at least one people who is both not talented and tense, then Pierce is not puzzled.
If Graham is puzzled, then Tony is round and Ramsey is tense, and vice versa.
Someone being not round is equivalent to being not tense.
Someone who is not tense is always both not talented and not round.
If someone is tense and talented, then he is massive and plain.
If there is at least one people who is tense, then Alexander is round. | Pierce is not round. | self_contradiction |
Pierce is round.
Graham is tense.
Pierce is tense.
Nathalie is puzzled.
Ramsey is not tense.
Ramsey is not massive.
Pierce is not talented.
Ramsey is talented.
Graham is not round.
Tony is talented.
Mila is not round.
Pierce is not plain.If there is someone who is either not round or puzzled, then Graham is not talented.
If someone is not tense and round, then he is both not puzzled and not talented, and vice versa.
If someone is talented or he is round, then he is not puzzled.
Alexander being not tense and Nathalie being not massive imply that Mila is not talented.
If someone is plain or he is tense, then he is not massive.
Tony is massive if and only if Alexander is plain.
If there is at least one people who is both not talented and tense, then Pierce is not puzzled.
If Graham is puzzled, then Tony is round and Ramsey is tense, and vice versa.
Someone being not round is equivalent to being not tense.
Someone who is not tense is always both not talented and not round.
If someone is tense and talented, then he is massive and plain.
If there is at least one people who is tense, then Alexander is round. | Tony is talented. | entailment |
Pierce is round.
Graham is tense.
Pierce is tense.
Nathalie is puzzled.
Ramsey is not tense.
Ramsey is not massive.
Pierce is not talented.
Ramsey is talented.
Graham is not round.
Tony is talented.
Mila is not round.
Pierce is not plain.If there is someone who is either not round or puzzled, then Graham is not talented.
If someone is not tense and round, then he is both not puzzled and not talented, and vice versa.
If someone is talented or he is round, then he is not puzzled.
Alexander being not tense and Nathalie being not massive imply that Mila is not talented.
If someone is plain or he is tense, then he is not massive.
Tony is massive if and only if Alexander is plain.
If there is at least one people who is both not talented and tense, then Pierce is not puzzled.
If Graham is puzzled, then Tony is round and Ramsey is tense, and vice versa.
Someone being not round is equivalent to being not tense.
Someone who is not tense is always both not talented and not round.
If someone is tense and talented, then he is massive and plain.
If there is at least one people who is tense, then Alexander is round. | Pierce is tense. | self_contradiction |
Pierce is round.
Graham is tense.
Pierce is tense.
Nathalie is puzzled.
Ramsey is not tense.
Ramsey is not massive.
Pierce is not talented.
Ramsey is talented.
Graham is not round.
Tony is talented.
Mila is not round.
Pierce is not plain.If there is someone who is either not round or puzzled, then Graham is not talented.
If someone is not tense and round, then he is both not puzzled and not talented, and vice versa.
If someone is talented or he is round, then he is not puzzled.
Alexander being not tense and Nathalie being not massive imply that Mila is not talented.
If someone is plain or he is tense, then he is not massive.
Tony is massive if and only if Alexander is plain.
If there is at least one people who is both not talented and tense, then Pierce is not puzzled.
If Graham is puzzled, then Tony is round and Ramsey is tense, and vice versa.
Someone being not round is equivalent to being not tense.
Someone who is not tense is always both not talented and not round.
If someone is tense and talented, then he is massive and plain.
If there is at least one people who is tense, then Alexander is round. | Ramsey is not talented. | self_contradiction |
Pierce is round.
Graham is tense.
Pierce is tense.
Nathalie is puzzled.
Ramsey is not tense.
Ramsey is not massive.
Pierce is not talented.
Ramsey is talented.
Graham is not round.
Tony is talented.
Mila is not round.
Pierce is not plain.If there is someone who is either not round or puzzled, then Graham is not talented.
If someone is not tense and round, then he is both not puzzled and not talented, and vice versa.
If someone is talented or he is round, then he is not puzzled.
Alexander being not tense and Nathalie being not massive imply that Mila is not talented.
If someone is plain or he is tense, then he is not massive.
Tony is massive if and only if Alexander is plain.
If there is at least one people who is both not talented and tense, then Pierce is not puzzled.
If Graham is puzzled, then Tony is round and Ramsey is tense, and vice versa.
Someone being not round is equivalent to being not tense.
Someone who is not tense is always both not talented and not round.
If someone is tense and talented, then he is massive and plain.
If there is at least one people who is tense, then Alexander is round. | Nathalie is not massive. | neutral |
Pierce is round.
Graham is tense.
Pierce is tense.
Nathalie is puzzled.
Ramsey is not tense.
Ramsey is not massive.
Pierce is not talented.
Ramsey is talented.
Graham is not round.
Tony is talented.
Mila is not round.
Pierce is not plain.If there is someone who is either not round or puzzled, then Graham is not talented.
If someone is not tense and round, then he is both not puzzled and not talented, and vice versa.
If someone is talented or he is round, then he is not puzzled.
Alexander being not tense and Nathalie being not massive imply that Mila is not talented.
If someone is plain or he is tense, then he is not massive.
Tony is massive if and only if Alexander is plain.
If there is at least one people who is both not talented and tense, then Pierce is not puzzled.
If Graham is puzzled, then Tony is round and Ramsey is tense, and vice versa.
Someone being not round is equivalent to being not tense.
Someone who is not tense is always both not talented and not round.
If someone is tense and talented, then he is massive and plain.
If there is at least one people who is tense, then Alexander is round. | Pierce is not puzzled. | entailment |
Pierce is round.
Graham is tense.
Pierce is tense.
Nathalie is puzzled.
Ramsey is not tense.
Ramsey is not massive.
Pierce is not talented.
Ramsey is talented.
Graham is not round.
Tony is talented.
Mila is not round.
Pierce is not plain.If there is someone who is either not round or puzzled, then Graham is not talented.
If someone is not tense and round, then he is both not puzzled and not talented, and vice versa.
If someone is talented or he is round, then he is not puzzled.
Alexander being not tense and Nathalie being not massive imply that Mila is not talented.
If someone is plain or he is tense, then he is not massive.
Tony is massive if and only if Alexander is plain.
If there is at least one people who is both not talented and tense, then Pierce is not puzzled.
If Graham is puzzled, then Tony is round and Ramsey is tense, and vice versa.
Someone being not round is equivalent to being not tense.
Someone who is not tense is always both not talented and not round.
If someone is tense and talented, then he is massive and plain.
If there is at least one people who is tense, then Alexander is round. | Pierce is puzzled. | contradiction |
Pierce is round.
Graham is tense.
Pierce is tense.
Nathalie is puzzled.
Ramsey is not tense.
Ramsey is not massive.
Pierce is not talented.
Ramsey is talented.
Graham is not round.
Tony is talented.
Mila is not round.
Pierce is not plain.If there is someone who is either not round or puzzled, then Graham is not talented.
If someone is not tense and round, then he is both not puzzled and not talented, and vice versa.
If someone is talented or he is round, then he is not puzzled.
Alexander being not tense and Nathalie being not massive imply that Mila is not talented.
If someone is plain or he is tense, then he is not massive.
Tony is massive if and only if Alexander is plain.
If there is at least one people who is both not talented and tense, then Pierce is not puzzled.
If Graham is puzzled, then Tony is round and Ramsey is tense, and vice versa.
Someone being not round is equivalent to being not tense.
Someone who is not tense is always both not talented and not round.
If someone is tense and talented, then he is massive and plain.
If there is at least one people who is tense, then Alexander is round. | Alexander is not puzzled. | entailment |
Pierce is round.
Graham is tense.
Pierce is tense.
Nathalie is puzzled.
Ramsey is not tense.
Ramsey is not massive.
Pierce is not talented.
Ramsey is talented.
Graham is not round.
Tony is talented.
Mila is not round.
Pierce is not plain.If there is someone who is either not round or puzzled, then Graham is not talented.
If someone is not tense and round, then he is both not puzzled and not talented, and vice versa.
If someone is talented or he is round, then he is not puzzled.
Alexander being not tense and Nathalie being not massive imply that Mila is not talented.
If someone is plain or he is tense, then he is not massive.
Tony is massive if and only if Alexander is plain.
If there is at least one people who is both not talented and tense, then Pierce is not puzzled.
If Graham is puzzled, then Tony is round and Ramsey is tense, and vice versa.
Someone being not round is equivalent to being not tense.
Someone who is not tense is always both not talented and not round.
If someone is tense and talented, then he is massive and plain.
If there is at least one people who is tense, then Alexander is round. | Pierce is round. | self_contradiction |
Pierce is round.
Graham is tense.
Pierce is tense.
Nathalie is puzzled.
Ramsey is not tense.
Ramsey is not massive.
Pierce is not talented.
Ramsey is talented.
Graham is not round.
Tony is talented.
Mila is not round.
Pierce is not plain.If there is someone who is either not round or puzzled, then Graham is not talented.
If someone is not tense and round, then he is both not puzzled and not talented, and vice versa.
If someone is talented or he is round, then he is not puzzled.
Alexander being not tense and Nathalie being not massive imply that Mila is not talented.
If someone is plain or he is tense, then he is not massive.
Tony is massive if and only if Alexander is plain.
If there is at least one people who is both not talented and tense, then Pierce is not puzzled.
If Graham is puzzled, then Tony is round and Ramsey is tense, and vice versa.
Someone being not round is equivalent to being not tense.
Someone who is not tense is always both not talented and not round.
If someone is tense and talented, then he is massive and plain.
If there is at least one people who is tense, then Alexander is round. | Ramsey is plain. | neutral |
Pierce is round.
Graham is tense.
Pierce is tense.
Nathalie is puzzled.
Ramsey is not tense.
Ramsey is not massive.
Pierce is not talented.
Ramsey is talented.
Graham is not round.
Tony is talented.
Mila is not round.
Pierce is not plain.If there is someone who is either not round or puzzled, then Graham is not talented.
If someone is not tense and round, then he is both not puzzled and not talented, and vice versa.
If someone is talented or he is round, then he is not puzzled.
Alexander being not tense and Nathalie being not massive imply that Mila is not talented.
If someone is plain or he is tense, then he is not massive.
Tony is massive if and only if Alexander is plain.
If there is at least one people who is both not talented and tense, then Pierce is not puzzled.
If Graham is puzzled, then Tony is round and Ramsey is tense, and vice versa.
Someone being not round is equivalent to being not tense.
Someone who is not tense is always both not talented and not round.
If someone is tense and talented, then he is massive and plain.
If there is at least one people who is tense, then Alexander is round. | Tony is massive. | neutral |
Pierce is round.
Graham is tense.
Pierce is tense.
Nathalie is puzzled.
Ramsey is not tense.
Ramsey is not massive.
Pierce is not talented.
Ramsey is talented.
Graham is not round.
Tony is talented.
Mila is not round.
Pierce is not plain.If there is someone who is either not round or puzzled, then Graham is not talented.
If someone is not tense and round, then he is both not puzzled and not talented, and vice versa.
If someone is talented or he is round, then he is not puzzled.
Alexander being not tense and Nathalie being not massive imply that Mila is not talented.
If someone is plain or he is tense, then he is not massive.
Tony is massive if and only if Alexander is plain.
If there is at least one people who is both not talented and tense, then Pierce is not puzzled.
If Graham is puzzled, then Tony is round and Ramsey is tense, and vice versa.
Someone being not round is equivalent to being not tense.
Someone who is not tense is always both not talented and not round.
If someone is tense and talented, then he is massive and plain.
If there is at least one people who is tense, then Alexander is round. | Pierce is not talented. | entailment |
Pierce is round.
Graham is tense.
Pierce is tense.
Nathalie is puzzled.
Ramsey is not tense.
Ramsey is not massive.
Pierce is not talented.
Ramsey is talented.
Graham is not round.
Tony is talented.
Mila is not round.
Pierce is not plain.If there is someone who is either not round or puzzled, then Graham is not talented.
If someone is not tense and round, then he is both not puzzled and not talented, and vice versa.
If someone is talented or he is round, then he is not puzzled.
Alexander being not tense and Nathalie being not massive imply that Mila is not talented.
If someone is plain or he is tense, then he is not massive.
Tony is massive if and only if Alexander is plain.
If there is at least one people who is both not talented and tense, then Pierce is not puzzled.
If Graham is puzzled, then Tony is round and Ramsey is tense, and vice versa.
Someone being not round is equivalent to being not tense.
Someone who is not tense is always both not talented and not round.
If someone is tense and talented, then he is massive and plain.
If there is at least one people who is tense, then Alexander is round. | Pierce is not massive. | entailment |
Pierce is round.
Graham is tense.
Pierce is tense.
Nathalie is puzzled.
Ramsey is not tense.
Ramsey is not massive.
Pierce is not talented.
Ramsey is talented.
Graham is not round.
Tony is talented.
Mila is not round.
Pierce is not plain.If there is someone who is either not round or puzzled, then Graham is not talented.
If someone is not tense and round, then he is both not puzzled and not talented, and vice versa.
If someone is talented or he is round, then he is not puzzled.
Alexander being not tense and Nathalie being not massive imply that Mila is not talented.
If someone is plain or he is tense, then he is not massive.
Tony is massive if and only if Alexander is plain.
If there is at least one people who is both not talented and tense, then Pierce is not puzzled.
If Graham is puzzled, then Tony is round and Ramsey is tense, and vice versa.
Someone being not round is equivalent to being not tense.
Someone who is not tense is always both not talented and not round.
If someone is tense and talented, then he is massive and plain.
If there is at least one people who is tense, then Alexander is round. | Mila is massive. | neutral |
Pierce is round.
Graham is tense.
Pierce is tense.
Nathalie is puzzled.
Ramsey is not tense.
Ramsey is not massive.
Pierce is not talented.
Ramsey is talented.
Graham is not round.
Tony is talented.
Mila is not round.
Pierce is not plain.If there is someone who is either not round or puzzled, then Graham is not talented.
If someone is not tense and round, then he is both not puzzled and not talented, and vice versa.
If someone is talented or he is round, then he is not puzzled.
Alexander being not tense and Nathalie being not massive imply that Mila is not talented.
If someone is plain or he is tense, then he is not massive.
Tony is massive if and only if Alexander is plain.
If there is at least one people who is both not talented and tense, then Pierce is not puzzled.
If Graham is puzzled, then Tony is round and Ramsey is tense, and vice versa.
Someone being not round is equivalent to being not tense.
Someone who is not tense is always both not talented and not round.
If someone is tense and talented, then he is massive and plain.
If there is at least one people who is tense, then Alexander is round. | Nathalie is not puzzled. | contradiction |
Pierce is round.
Graham is tense.
Pierce is tense.
Nathalie is puzzled.
Ramsey is not tense.
Ramsey is not massive.
Pierce is not talented.
Ramsey is talented.
Graham is not round.
Tony is talented.
Mila is not round.
Pierce is not plain.If there is someone who is either not round or puzzled, then Graham is not talented.
If someone is not tense and round, then he is both not puzzled and not talented, and vice versa.
If someone is talented or he is round, then he is not puzzled.
Alexander being not tense and Nathalie being not massive imply that Mila is not talented.
If someone is plain or he is tense, then he is not massive.
Tony is massive if and only if Alexander is plain.
If there is at least one people who is both not talented and tense, then Pierce is not puzzled.
If Graham is puzzled, then Tony is round and Ramsey is tense, and vice versa.
Someone being not round is equivalent to being not tense.
Someone who is not tense is always both not talented and not round.
If someone is tense and talented, then he is massive and plain.
If there is at least one people who is tense, then Alexander is round. | Graham is tense. | self_contradiction |
Pierce is round.
Graham is tense.
Pierce is tense.
Nathalie is puzzled.
Ramsey is not tense.
Ramsey is not massive.
Pierce is not talented.
Ramsey is talented.
Graham is not round.
Tony is talented.
Mila is not round.
Pierce is not plain.If there is someone who is either not round or puzzled, then Graham is not talented.
If someone is not tense and round, then he is both not puzzled and not talented, and vice versa.
If someone is talented or he is round, then he is not puzzled.
Alexander being not tense and Nathalie being not massive imply that Mila is not talented.
If someone is plain or he is tense, then he is not massive.
Tony is massive if and only if Alexander is plain.
If there is at least one people who is both not talented and tense, then Pierce is not puzzled.
If Graham is puzzled, then Tony is round and Ramsey is tense, and vice versa.
Someone being not round is equivalent to being not tense.
Someone who is not tense is always both not talented and not round.
If someone is tense and talented, then he is massive and plain.
If there is at least one people who is tense, then Alexander is round. | Alexander is not round. | contradiction |
Arthur is impartial.
Aubrey is cold.
Arthur is legal.
Caldwell is impartial.
Arthur is not fair-minded.
Otis is legal.
Arthur is not charming.
Caldwell is cold.
Otis is not impartial.
Caldwell is odd.
Otis is not cold.
Anabelle is not fair-minded.If someone is both fair-minded and not charming, then he is not odd.
If there is at least one people who is not legal or not cold, then Aubrey is not charming.
It can be concluded that Anabelle is not odd and Anabelle is fair-minded once knowing that Aubrey is not legal and Lucille is not impartial.
Someone being both not fair-minded and not cold is equivalent to being not charming.
If there is at least one people who is charming, then Otis is not legal and Anabelle is fair-minded.
If there is at least one people who is fair-minded, then Aubrey is not odd.
As long as someone is either not charming or impartial, he is not legal and fair-minded.
Someone is charming if and only if he is not legal.
If someone is charming, then he is odd.
Someone being both not odd and not impartial is equivalent to being legal and cold.
Someone who is not cold is always both charming and not legal.
If someone is both cold and fair-minded, then he is legal. | Anabelle is not fair-minded. | self_contradiction |
Arthur is impartial.
Aubrey is cold.
Arthur is legal.
Caldwell is impartial.
Arthur is not fair-minded.
Otis is legal.
Arthur is not charming.
Caldwell is cold.
Otis is not impartial.
Caldwell is odd.
Otis is not cold.
Anabelle is not fair-minded.If someone is both fair-minded and not charming, then he is not odd.
If there is at least one people who is not legal or not cold, then Aubrey is not charming.
It can be concluded that Anabelle is not odd and Anabelle is fair-minded once knowing that Aubrey is not legal and Lucille is not impartial.
Someone being both not fair-minded and not cold is equivalent to being not charming.
If there is at least one people who is charming, then Otis is not legal and Anabelle is fair-minded.
If there is at least one people who is fair-minded, then Aubrey is not odd.
As long as someone is either not charming or impartial, he is not legal and fair-minded.
Someone is charming if and only if he is not legal.
If someone is charming, then he is odd.
Someone being both not odd and not impartial is equivalent to being legal and cold.
Someone who is not cold is always both charming and not legal.
If someone is both cold and fair-minded, then he is legal. | Otis is not cold. | entailment |
Arthur is impartial.
Aubrey is cold.
Arthur is legal.
Caldwell is impartial.
Arthur is not fair-minded.
Otis is legal.
Arthur is not charming.
Caldwell is cold.
Otis is not impartial.
Caldwell is odd.
Otis is not cold.
Anabelle is not fair-minded.If someone is both fair-minded and not charming, then he is not odd.
If there is at least one people who is not legal or not cold, then Aubrey is not charming.
It can be concluded that Anabelle is not odd and Anabelle is fair-minded once knowing that Aubrey is not legal and Lucille is not impartial.
Someone being both not fair-minded and not cold is equivalent to being not charming.
If there is at least one people who is charming, then Otis is not legal and Anabelle is fair-minded.
If there is at least one people who is fair-minded, then Aubrey is not odd.
As long as someone is either not charming or impartial, he is not legal and fair-minded.
Someone is charming if and only if he is not legal.
If someone is charming, then he is odd.
Someone being both not odd and not impartial is equivalent to being legal and cold.
Someone who is not cold is always both charming and not legal.
If someone is both cold and fair-minded, then he is legal. | Ryan is not fair-minded. | neutral |
Arthur is impartial.
Aubrey is cold.
Arthur is legal.
Caldwell is impartial.
Arthur is not fair-minded.
Otis is legal.
Arthur is not charming.
Caldwell is cold.
Otis is not impartial.
Caldwell is odd.
Otis is not cold.
Anabelle is not fair-minded.If someone is both fair-minded and not charming, then he is not odd.
If there is at least one people who is not legal or not cold, then Aubrey is not charming.
It can be concluded that Anabelle is not odd and Anabelle is fair-minded once knowing that Aubrey is not legal and Lucille is not impartial.
Someone being both not fair-minded and not cold is equivalent to being not charming.
If there is at least one people who is charming, then Otis is not legal and Anabelle is fair-minded.
If there is at least one people who is fair-minded, then Aubrey is not odd.
As long as someone is either not charming or impartial, he is not legal and fair-minded.
Someone is charming if and only if he is not legal.
If someone is charming, then he is odd.
Someone being both not odd and not impartial is equivalent to being legal and cold.
Someone who is not cold is always both charming and not legal.
If someone is both cold and fair-minded, then he is legal. | Caldwell is not charming. | contradiction |
Arthur is impartial.
Aubrey is cold.
Arthur is legal.
Caldwell is impartial.
Arthur is not fair-minded.
Otis is legal.
Arthur is not charming.
Caldwell is cold.
Otis is not impartial.
Caldwell is odd.
Otis is not cold.
Anabelle is not fair-minded.If someone is both fair-minded and not charming, then he is not odd.
If there is at least one people who is not legal or not cold, then Aubrey is not charming.
It can be concluded that Anabelle is not odd and Anabelle is fair-minded once knowing that Aubrey is not legal and Lucille is not impartial.
Someone being both not fair-minded and not cold is equivalent to being not charming.
If there is at least one people who is charming, then Otis is not legal and Anabelle is fair-minded.
If there is at least one people who is fair-minded, then Aubrey is not odd.
As long as someone is either not charming or impartial, he is not legal and fair-minded.
Someone is charming if and only if he is not legal.
If someone is charming, then he is odd.
Someone being both not odd and not impartial is equivalent to being legal and cold.
Someone who is not cold is always both charming and not legal.
If someone is both cold and fair-minded, then he is legal. | Caldwell is fair-minded. | entailment |
Arthur is impartial.
Aubrey is cold.
Arthur is legal.
Caldwell is impartial.
Arthur is not fair-minded.
Otis is legal.
Arthur is not charming.
Caldwell is cold.
Otis is not impartial.
Caldwell is odd.
Otis is not cold.
Anabelle is not fair-minded.If someone is both fair-minded and not charming, then he is not odd.
If there is at least one people who is not legal or not cold, then Aubrey is not charming.
It can be concluded that Anabelle is not odd and Anabelle is fair-minded once knowing that Aubrey is not legal and Lucille is not impartial.
Someone being both not fair-minded and not cold is equivalent to being not charming.
If there is at least one people who is charming, then Otis is not legal and Anabelle is fair-minded.
If there is at least one people who is fair-minded, then Aubrey is not odd.
As long as someone is either not charming or impartial, he is not legal and fair-minded.
Someone is charming if and only if he is not legal.
If someone is charming, then he is odd.
Someone being both not odd and not impartial is equivalent to being legal and cold.
Someone who is not cold is always both charming and not legal.
If someone is both cold and fair-minded, then he is legal. | Otis is not impartial. | entailment |
Arthur is impartial.
Aubrey is cold.
Arthur is legal.
Caldwell is impartial.
Arthur is not fair-minded.
Otis is legal.
Arthur is not charming.
Caldwell is cold.
Otis is not impartial.
Caldwell is odd.
Otis is not cold.
Anabelle is not fair-minded.If someone is both fair-minded and not charming, then he is not odd.
If there is at least one people who is not legal or not cold, then Aubrey is not charming.
It can be concluded that Anabelle is not odd and Anabelle is fair-minded once knowing that Aubrey is not legal and Lucille is not impartial.
Someone being both not fair-minded and not cold is equivalent to being not charming.
If there is at least one people who is charming, then Otis is not legal and Anabelle is fair-minded.
If there is at least one people who is fair-minded, then Aubrey is not odd.
As long as someone is either not charming or impartial, he is not legal and fair-minded.
Someone is charming if and only if he is not legal.
If someone is charming, then he is odd.
Someone being both not odd and not impartial is equivalent to being legal and cold.
Someone who is not cold is always both charming and not legal.
If someone is both cold and fair-minded, then he is legal. | Aubrey is cold. | self_contradiction |
Arthur is impartial.
Aubrey is cold.
Arthur is legal.
Caldwell is impartial.
Arthur is not fair-minded.
Otis is legal.
Arthur is not charming.
Caldwell is cold.
Otis is not impartial.
Caldwell is odd.
Otis is not cold.
Anabelle is not fair-minded.If someone is both fair-minded and not charming, then he is not odd.
If there is at least one people who is not legal or not cold, then Aubrey is not charming.
It can be concluded that Anabelle is not odd and Anabelle is fair-minded once knowing that Aubrey is not legal and Lucille is not impartial.
Someone being both not fair-minded and not cold is equivalent to being not charming.
If there is at least one people who is charming, then Otis is not legal and Anabelle is fair-minded.
If there is at least one people who is fair-minded, then Aubrey is not odd.
As long as someone is either not charming or impartial, he is not legal and fair-minded.
Someone is charming if and only if he is not legal.
If someone is charming, then he is odd.
Someone being both not odd and not impartial is equivalent to being legal and cold.
Someone who is not cold is always both charming and not legal.
If someone is both cold and fair-minded, then he is legal. | Otis is impartial. | contradiction |
Arthur is impartial.
Aubrey is cold.
Arthur is legal.
Caldwell is impartial.
Arthur is not fair-minded.
Otis is legal.
Arthur is not charming.
Caldwell is cold.
Otis is not impartial.
Caldwell is odd.
Otis is not cold.
Anabelle is not fair-minded.If someone is both fair-minded and not charming, then he is not odd.
If there is at least one people who is not legal or not cold, then Aubrey is not charming.
It can be concluded that Anabelle is not odd and Anabelle is fair-minded once knowing that Aubrey is not legal and Lucille is not impartial.
Someone being both not fair-minded and not cold is equivalent to being not charming.
If there is at least one people who is charming, then Otis is not legal and Anabelle is fair-minded.
If there is at least one people who is fair-minded, then Aubrey is not odd.
As long as someone is either not charming or impartial, he is not legal and fair-minded.
Someone is charming if and only if he is not legal.
If someone is charming, then he is odd.
Someone being both not odd and not impartial is equivalent to being legal and cold.
Someone who is not cold is always both charming and not legal.
If someone is both cold and fair-minded, then he is legal. | Caldwell is charming. | entailment |
Arthur is impartial.
Aubrey is cold.
Arthur is legal.
Caldwell is impartial.
Arthur is not fair-minded.
Otis is legal.
Arthur is not charming.
Caldwell is cold.
Otis is not impartial.
Caldwell is odd.
Otis is not cold.
Anabelle is not fair-minded.If someone is both fair-minded and not charming, then he is not odd.
If there is at least one people who is not legal or not cold, then Aubrey is not charming.
It can be concluded that Anabelle is not odd and Anabelle is fair-minded once knowing that Aubrey is not legal and Lucille is not impartial.
Someone being both not fair-minded and not cold is equivalent to being not charming.
If there is at least one people who is charming, then Otis is not legal and Anabelle is fair-minded.
If there is at least one people who is fair-minded, then Aubrey is not odd.
As long as someone is either not charming or impartial, he is not legal and fair-minded.
Someone is charming if and only if he is not legal.
If someone is charming, then he is odd.
Someone being both not odd and not impartial is equivalent to being legal and cold.
Someone who is not cold is always both charming and not legal.
If someone is both cold and fair-minded, then he is legal. | Anabelle is not cold. | neutral |
Arthur is impartial.
Aubrey is cold.
Arthur is legal.
Caldwell is impartial.
Arthur is not fair-minded.
Otis is legal.
Arthur is not charming.
Caldwell is cold.
Otis is not impartial.
Caldwell is odd.
Otis is not cold.
Anabelle is not fair-minded.If someone is both fair-minded and not charming, then he is not odd.
If there is at least one people who is not legal or not cold, then Aubrey is not charming.
It can be concluded that Anabelle is not odd and Anabelle is fair-minded once knowing that Aubrey is not legal and Lucille is not impartial.
Someone being both not fair-minded and not cold is equivalent to being not charming.
If there is at least one people who is charming, then Otis is not legal and Anabelle is fair-minded.
If there is at least one people who is fair-minded, then Aubrey is not odd.
As long as someone is either not charming or impartial, he is not legal and fair-minded.
Someone is charming if and only if he is not legal.
If someone is charming, then he is odd.
Someone being both not odd and not impartial is equivalent to being legal and cold.
Someone who is not cold is always both charming and not legal.
If someone is both cold and fair-minded, then he is legal. | Otis is odd. | entailment |
Arthur is impartial.
Aubrey is cold.
Arthur is legal.
Caldwell is impartial.
Arthur is not fair-minded.
Otis is legal.
Arthur is not charming.
Caldwell is cold.
Otis is not impartial.
Caldwell is odd.
Otis is not cold.
Anabelle is not fair-minded.If someone is both fair-minded and not charming, then he is not odd.
If there is at least one people who is not legal or not cold, then Aubrey is not charming.
It can be concluded that Anabelle is not odd and Anabelle is fair-minded once knowing that Aubrey is not legal and Lucille is not impartial.
Someone being both not fair-minded and not cold is equivalent to being not charming.
If there is at least one people who is charming, then Otis is not legal and Anabelle is fair-minded.
If there is at least one people who is fair-minded, then Aubrey is not odd.
As long as someone is either not charming or impartial, he is not legal and fair-minded.
Someone is charming if and only if he is not legal.
If someone is charming, then he is odd.
Someone being both not odd and not impartial is equivalent to being legal and cold.
Someone who is not cold is always both charming and not legal.
If someone is both cold and fair-minded, then he is legal. | Aubrey is not charming. | self_contradiction |
Arthur is impartial.
Aubrey is cold.
Arthur is legal.
Caldwell is impartial.
Arthur is not fair-minded.
Otis is legal.
Arthur is not charming.
Caldwell is cold.
Otis is not impartial.
Caldwell is odd.
Otis is not cold.
Anabelle is not fair-minded.If someone is both fair-minded and not charming, then he is not odd.
If there is at least one people who is not legal or not cold, then Aubrey is not charming.
It can be concluded that Anabelle is not odd and Anabelle is fair-minded once knowing that Aubrey is not legal and Lucille is not impartial.
Someone being both not fair-minded and not cold is equivalent to being not charming.
If there is at least one people who is charming, then Otis is not legal and Anabelle is fair-minded.
If there is at least one people who is fair-minded, then Aubrey is not odd.
As long as someone is either not charming or impartial, he is not legal and fair-minded.
Someone is charming if and only if he is not legal.
If someone is charming, then he is odd.
Someone being both not odd and not impartial is equivalent to being legal and cold.
Someone who is not cold is always both charming and not legal.
If someone is both cold and fair-minded, then he is legal. | Arthur is charming. | self_contradiction |
Arthur is impartial.
Aubrey is cold.
Arthur is legal.
Caldwell is impartial.
Arthur is not fair-minded.
Otis is legal.
Arthur is not charming.
Caldwell is cold.
Otis is not impartial.
Caldwell is odd.
Otis is not cold.
Anabelle is not fair-minded.If someone is both fair-minded and not charming, then he is not odd.
If there is at least one people who is not legal or not cold, then Aubrey is not charming.
It can be concluded that Anabelle is not odd and Anabelle is fair-minded once knowing that Aubrey is not legal and Lucille is not impartial.
Someone being both not fair-minded and not cold is equivalent to being not charming.
If there is at least one people who is charming, then Otis is not legal and Anabelle is fair-minded.
If there is at least one people who is fair-minded, then Aubrey is not odd.
As long as someone is either not charming or impartial, he is not legal and fair-minded.
Someone is charming if and only if he is not legal.
If someone is charming, then he is odd.
Someone being both not odd and not impartial is equivalent to being legal and cold.
Someone who is not cold is always both charming and not legal.
If someone is both cold and fair-minded, then he is legal. | Otis is fair-minded. | neutral |
Arthur is impartial.
Aubrey is cold.
Arthur is legal.
Caldwell is impartial.
Arthur is not fair-minded.
Otis is legal.
Arthur is not charming.
Caldwell is cold.
Otis is not impartial.
Caldwell is odd.
Otis is not cold.
Anabelle is not fair-minded.If someone is both fair-minded and not charming, then he is not odd.
If there is at least one people who is not legal or not cold, then Aubrey is not charming.
It can be concluded that Anabelle is not odd and Anabelle is fair-minded once knowing that Aubrey is not legal and Lucille is not impartial.
Someone being both not fair-minded and not cold is equivalent to being not charming.
If there is at least one people who is charming, then Otis is not legal and Anabelle is fair-minded.
If there is at least one people who is fair-minded, then Aubrey is not odd.
As long as someone is either not charming or impartial, he is not legal and fair-minded.
Someone is charming if and only if he is not legal.
If someone is charming, then he is odd.
Someone being both not odd and not impartial is equivalent to being legal and cold.
Someone who is not cold is always both charming and not legal.
If someone is both cold and fair-minded, then he is legal. | Arthur is cold. | contradiction |
Arthur is impartial.
Aubrey is cold.
Arthur is legal.
Caldwell is impartial.
Arthur is not fair-minded.
Otis is legal.
Arthur is not charming.
Caldwell is cold.
Otis is not impartial.
Caldwell is odd.
Otis is not cold.
Anabelle is not fair-minded.If someone is both fair-minded and not charming, then he is not odd.
If there is at least one people who is not legal or not cold, then Aubrey is not charming.
It can be concluded that Anabelle is not odd and Anabelle is fair-minded once knowing that Aubrey is not legal and Lucille is not impartial.
Someone being both not fair-minded and not cold is equivalent to being not charming.
If there is at least one people who is charming, then Otis is not legal and Anabelle is fair-minded.
If there is at least one people who is fair-minded, then Aubrey is not odd.
As long as someone is either not charming or impartial, he is not legal and fair-minded.
Someone is charming if and only if he is not legal.
If someone is charming, then he is odd.
Someone being both not odd and not impartial is equivalent to being legal and cold.
Someone who is not cold is always both charming and not legal.
If someone is both cold and fair-minded, then he is legal. | Otis is not charming. | contradiction |
Arthur is impartial.
Aubrey is cold.
Arthur is legal.
Caldwell is impartial.
Arthur is not fair-minded.
Otis is legal.
Arthur is not charming.
Caldwell is cold.
Otis is not impartial.
Caldwell is odd.
Otis is not cold.
Anabelle is not fair-minded.If someone is both fair-minded and not charming, then he is not odd.
If there is at least one people who is not legal or not cold, then Aubrey is not charming.
It can be concluded that Anabelle is not odd and Anabelle is fair-minded once knowing that Aubrey is not legal and Lucille is not impartial.
Someone being both not fair-minded and not cold is equivalent to being not charming.
If there is at least one people who is charming, then Otis is not legal and Anabelle is fair-minded.
If there is at least one people who is fair-minded, then Aubrey is not odd.
As long as someone is either not charming or impartial, he is not legal and fair-minded.
Someone is charming if and only if he is not legal.
If someone is charming, then he is odd.
Someone being both not odd and not impartial is equivalent to being legal and cold.
Someone who is not cold is always both charming and not legal.
If someone is both cold and fair-minded, then he is legal. | Aubrey is not cold. | self_contradiction |
Arthur is impartial.
Aubrey is cold.
Arthur is legal.
Caldwell is impartial.
Arthur is not fair-minded.
Otis is legal.
Arthur is not charming.
Caldwell is cold.
Otis is not impartial.
Caldwell is odd.
Otis is not cold.
Anabelle is not fair-minded.If someone is both fair-minded and not charming, then he is not odd.
If there is at least one people who is not legal or not cold, then Aubrey is not charming.
It can be concluded that Anabelle is not odd and Anabelle is fair-minded once knowing that Aubrey is not legal and Lucille is not impartial.
Someone being both not fair-minded and not cold is equivalent to being not charming.
If there is at least one people who is charming, then Otis is not legal and Anabelle is fair-minded.
If there is at least one people who is fair-minded, then Aubrey is not odd.
As long as someone is either not charming or impartial, he is not legal and fair-minded.
Someone is charming if and only if he is not legal.
If someone is charming, then he is odd.
Someone being both not odd and not impartial is equivalent to being legal and cold.
Someone who is not cold is always both charming and not legal.
If someone is both cold and fair-minded, then he is legal. | Ryan is not impartial. | neutral |
Arthur is impartial.
Aubrey is cold.
Arthur is legal.
Caldwell is impartial.
Arthur is not fair-minded.
Otis is legal.
Arthur is not charming.
Caldwell is cold.
Otis is not impartial.
Caldwell is odd.
Otis is not cold.
Anabelle is not fair-minded.If someone is both fair-minded and not charming, then he is not odd.
If there is at least one people who is not legal or not cold, then Aubrey is not charming.
It can be concluded that Anabelle is not odd and Anabelle is fair-minded once knowing that Aubrey is not legal and Lucille is not impartial.
Someone being both not fair-minded and not cold is equivalent to being not charming.
If there is at least one people who is charming, then Otis is not legal and Anabelle is fair-minded.
If there is at least one people who is fair-minded, then Aubrey is not odd.
As long as someone is either not charming or impartial, he is not legal and fair-minded.
Someone is charming if and only if he is not legal.
If someone is charming, then he is odd.
Someone being both not odd and not impartial is equivalent to being legal and cold.
Someone who is not cold is always both charming and not legal.
If someone is both cold and fair-minded, then he is legal. | Otis is cold. | contradiction |
Arthur is impartial.
Aubrey is cold.
Arthur is legal.
Caldwell is impartial.
Arthur is not fair-minded.
Otis is legal.
Arthur is not charming.
Caldwell is cold.
Otis is not impartial.
Caldwell is odd.
Otis is not cold.
Anabelle is not fair-minded.If someone is both fair-minded and not charming, then he is not odd.
If there is at least one people who is not legal or not cold, then Aubrey is not charming.
It can be concluded that Anabelle is not odd and Anabelle is fair-minded once knowing that Aubrey is not legal and Lucille is not impartial.
Someone being both not fair-minded and not cold is equivalent to being not charming.
If there is at least one people who is charming, then Otis is not legal and Anabelle is fair-minded.
If there is at least one people who is fair-minded, then Aubrey is not odd.
As long as someone is either not charming or impartial, he is not legal and fair-minded.
Someone is charming if and only if he is not legal.
If someone is charming, then he is odd.
Someone being both not odd and not impartial is equivalent to being legal and cold.
Someone who is not cold is always both charming and not legal.
If someone is both cold and fair-minded, then he is legal. | Anabelle is cold. | neutral |
Benton is not timid.
Lane is not intelligent.
Lionel is available.
Douglas is not available.
Douglas is not shiny.
Harley is timid.
Benton is shiny.
Benton is not intelligent.
Harley is homely.
Benton is homely.
Lionel is not timid.
Brian is not administrative.Someone being both intelligent and not timid is equivalent to being not homely.
If Addison is administrative or Harley is homely, then Harley is timid.
Harley being timid implies that Harley is not shiny and Harley is not intelligent.
If someone who is not administrative is also not timid, then he is not homely.
If someone is administrative and available, then he is both homely and not shiny, and vice versa.
If someone is available, then he is intelligent.
if there is at least one people who is not homely and not administrative, then Douglas is intelligent and Lane is timid.
It can be concluded that Lane is not available once knowing that Lionel is intelligent and Benton is timid.
Brian is timid if and only if Addison is not administrative and Addison is not intelligent.
If all people are not administrative or intelligent, then Benton is not homely.
Someone being both not homely and not administrative is equivalent to being timid.
If there is someone who is shiny, then Douglas is administrative. | Brian is intelligent. | neutral |
Benton is not timid.
Lane is not intelligent.
Lionel is available.
Douglas is not available.
Douglas is not shiny.
Harley is timid.
Benton is shiny.
Benton is not intelligent.
Harley is homely.
Benton is homely.
Lionel is not timid.
Brian is not administrative.Someone being both intelligent and not timid is equivalent to being not homely.
If Addison is administrative or Harley is homely, then Harley is timid.
Harley being timid implies that Harley is not shiny and Harley is not intelligent.
If someone who is not administrative is also not timid, then he is not homely.
If someone is administrative and available, then he is both homely and not shiny, and vice versa.
If someone is available, then he is intelligent.
if there is at least one people who is not homely and not administrative, then Douglas is intelligent and Lane is timid.
It can be concluded that Lane is not available once knowing that Lionel is intelligent and Benton is timid.
Brian is timid if and only if Addison is not administrative and Addison is not intelligent.
If all people are not administrative or intelligent, then Benton is not homely.
Someone being both not homely and not administrative is equivalent to being timid.
If there is someone who is shiny, then Douglas is administrative. | Douglas is not available. | entailment |
Benton is not timid.
Lane is not intelligent.
Lionel is available.
Douglas is not available.
Douglas is not shiny.
Harley is timid.
Benton is shiny.
Benton is not intelligent.
Harley is homely.
Benton is homely.
Lionel is not timid.
Brian is not administrative.Someone being both intelligent and not timid is equivalent to being not homely.
If Addison is administrative or Harley is homely, then Harley is timid.
Harley being timid implies that Harley is not shiny and Harley is not intelligent.
If someone who is not administrative is also not timid, then he is not homely.
If someone is administrative and available, then he is both homely and not shiny, and vice versa.
If someone is available, then he is intelligent.
if there is at least one people who is not homely and not administrative, then Douglas is intelligent and Lane is timid.
It can be concluded that Lane is not available once knowing that Lionel is intelligent and Benton is timid.
Brian is timid if and only if Addison is not administrative and Addison is not intelligent.
If all people are not administrative or intelligent, then Benton is not homely.
Someone being both not homely and not administrative is equivalent to being timid.
If there is someone who is shiny, then Douglas is administrative. | Harley is not homely. | self_contradiction |
Benton is not timid.
Lane is not intelligent.
Lionel is available.
Douglas is not available.
Douglas is not shiny.
Harley is timid.
Benton is shiny.
Benton is not intelligent.
Harley is homely.
Benton is homely.
Lionel is not timid.
Brian is not administrative.Someone being both intelligent and not timid is equivalent to being not homely.
If Addison is administrative or Harley is homely, then Harley is timid.
Harley being timid implies that Harley is not shiny and Harley is not intelligent.
If someone who is not administrative is also not timid, then he is not homely.
If someone is administrative and available, then he is both homely and not shiny, and vice versa.
If someone is available, then he is intelligent.
if there is at least one people who is not homely and not administrative, then Douglas is intelligent and Lane is timid.
It can be concluded that Lane is not available once knowing that Lionel is intelligent and Benton is timid.
Brian is timid if and only if Addison is not administrative and Addison is not intelligent.
If all people are not administrative or intelligent, then Benton is not homely.
Someone being both not homely and not administrative is equivalent to being timid.
If there is someone who is shiny, then Douglas is administrative. | Lionel is not available. | contradiction |
Benton is not timid.
Lane is not intelligent.
Lionel is available.
Douglas is not available.
Douglas is not shiny.
Harley is timid.
Benton is shiny.
Benton is not intelligent.
Harley is homely.
Benton is homely.
Lionel is not timid.
Brian is not administrative.Someone being both intelligent and not timid is equivalent to being not homely.
If Addison is administrative or Harley is homely, then Harley is timid.
Harley being timid implies that Harley is not shiny and Harley is not intelligent.
If someone who is not administrative is also not timid, then he is not homely.
If someone is administrative and available, then he is both homely and not shiny, and vice versa.
If someone is available, then he is intelligent.
if there is at least one people who is not homely and not administrative, then Douglas is intelligent and Lane is timid.
It can be concluded that Lane is not available once knowing that Lionel is intelligent and Benton is timid.
Brian is timid if and only if Addison is not administrative and Addison is not intelligent.
If all people are not administrative or intelligent, then Benton is not homely.
Someone being both not homely and not administrative is equivalent to being timid.
If there is someone who is shiny, then Douglas is administrative. | Addison is intelligent. | neutral |
Benton is not timid.
Lane is not intelligent.
Lionel is available.
Douglas is not available.
Douglas is not shiny.
Harley is timid.
Benton is shiny.
Benton is not intelligent.
Harley is homely.
Benton is homely.
Lionel is not timid.
Brian is not administrative.Someone being both intelligent and not timid is equivalent to being not homely.
If Addison is administrative or Harley is homely, then Harley is timid.
Harley being timid implies that Harley is not shiny and Harley is not intelligent.
If someone who is not administrative is also not timid, then he is not homely.
If someone is administrative and available, then he is both homely and not shiny, and vice versa.
If someone is available, then he is intelligent.
if there is at least one people who is not homely and not administrative, then Douglas is intelligent and Lane is timid.
It can be concluded that Lane is not available once knowing that Lionel is intelligent and Benton is timid.
Brian is timid if and only if Addison is not administrative and Addison is not intelligent.
If all people are not administrative or intelligent, then Benton is not homely.
Someone being both not homely and not administrative is equivalent to being timid.
If there is someone who is shiny, then Douglas is administrative. | Douglas is not homely. | neutral |
Benton is not timid.
Lane is not intelligent.
Lionel is available.
Douglas is not available.
Douglas is not shiny.
Harley is timid.
Benton is shiny.
Benton is not intelligent.
Harley is homely.
Benton is homely.
Lionel is not timid.
Brian is not administrative.Someone being both intelligent and not timid is equivalent to being not homely.
If Addison is administrative or Harley is homely, then Harley is timid.
Harley being timid implies that Harley is not shiny and Harley is not intelligent.
If someone who is not administrative is also not timid, then he is not homely.
If someone is administrative and available, then he is both homely and not shiny, and vice versa.
If someone is available, then he is intelligent.
if there is at least one people who is not homely and not administrative, then Douglas is intelligent and Lane is timid.
It can be concluded that Lane is not available once knowing that Lionel is intelligent and Benton is timid.
Brian is timid if and only if Addison is not administrative and Addison is not intelligent.
If all people are not administrative or intelligent, then Benton is not homely.
Someone being both not homely and not administrative is equivalent to being timid.
If there is someone who is shiny, then Douglas is administrative. | Douglas is not administrative. | contradiction |
Benton is not timid.
Lane is not intelligent.
Lionel is available.
Douglas is not available.
Douglas is not shiny.
Harley is timid.
Benton is shiny.
Benton is not intelligent.
Harley is homely.
Benton is homely.
Lionel is not timid.
Brian is not administrative.Someone being both intelligent and not timid is equivalent to being not homely.
If Addison is administrative or Harley is homely, then Harley is timid.
Harley being timid implies that Harley is not shiny and Harley is not intelligent.
If someone who is not administrative is also not timid, then he is not homely.
If someone is administrative and available, then he is both homely and not shiny, and vice versa.
If someone is available, then he is intelligent.
if there is at least one people who is not homely and not administrative, then Douglas is intelligent and Lane is timid.
It can be concluded that Lane is not available once knowing that Lionel is intelligent and Benton is timid.
Brian is timid if and only if Addison is not administrative and Addison is not intelligent.
If all people are not administrative or intelligent, then Benton is not homely.
Someone being both not homely and not administrative is equivalent to being timid.
If there is someone who is shiny, then Douglas is administrative. | Harley is shiny. | contradiction |
Benton is not timid.
Lane is not intelligent.
Lionel is available.
Douglas is not available.
Douglas is not shiny.
Harley is timid.
Benton is shiny.
Benton is not intelligent.
Harley is homely.
Benton is homely.
Lionel is not timid.
Brian is not administrative.Someone being both intelligent and not timid is equivalent to being not homely.
If Addison is administrative or Harley is homely, then Harley is timid.
Harley being timid implies that Harley is not shiny and Harley is not intelligent.
If someone who is not administrative is also not timid, then he is not homely.
If someone is administrative and available, then he is both homely and not shiny, and vice versa.
If someone is available, then he is intelligent.
if there is at least one people who is not homely and not administrative, then Douglas is intelligent and Lane is timid.
It can be concluded that Lane is not available once knowing that Lionel is intelligent and Benton is timid.
Brian is timid if and only if Addison is not administrative and Addison is not intelligent.
If all people are not administrative or intelligent, then Benton is not homely.
Someone being both not homely and not administrative is equivalent to being timid.
If there is someone who is shiny, then Douglas is administrative. | Lane is not homely. | entailment |
Benton is not timid.
Lane is not intelligent.
Lionel is available.
Douglas is not available.
Douglas is not shiny.
Harley is timid.
Benton is shiny.
Benton is not intelligent.
Harley is homely.
Benton is homely.
Lionel is not timid.
Brian is not administrative.Someone being both intelligent and not timid is equivalent to being not homely.
If Addison is administrative or Harley is homely, then Harley is timid.
Harley being timid implies that Harley is not shiny and Harley is not intelligent.
If someone who is not administrative is also not timid, then he is not homely.
If someone is administrative and available, then he is both homely and not shiny, and vice versa.
If someone is available, then he is intelligent.
if there is at least one people who is not homely and not administrative, then Douglas is intelligent and Lane is timid.
It can be concluded that Lane is not available once knowing that Lionel is intelligent and Benton is timid.
Brian is timid if and only if Addison is not administrative and Addison is not intelligent.
If all people are not administrative or intelligent, then Benton is not homely.
Someone being both not homely and not administrative is equivalent to being timid.
If there is someone who is shiny, then Douglas is administrative. | Lane is not administrative. | entailment |
Benton is not timid.
Lane is not intelligent.
Lionel is available.
Douglas is not available.
Douglas is not shiny.
Harley is timid.
Benton is shiny.
Benton is not intelligent.
Harley is homely.
Benton is homely.
Lionel is not timid.
Brian is not administrative.Someone being both intelligent and not timid is equivalent to being not homely.
If Addison is administrative or Harley is homely, then Harley is timid.
Harley being timid implies that Harley is not shiny and Harley is not intelligent.
If someone who is not administrative is also not timid, then he is not homely.
If someone is administrative and available, then he is both homely and not shiny, and vice versa.
If someone is available, then he is intelligent.
if there is at least one people who is not homely and not administrative, then Douglas is intelligent and Lane is timid.
It can be concluded that Lane is not available once knowing that Lionel is intelligent and Benton is timid.
Brian is timid if and only if Addison is not administrative and Addison is not intelligent.
If all people are not administrative or intelligent, then Benton is not homely.
Someone being both not homely and not administrative is equivalent to being timid.
If there is someone who is shiny, then Douglas is administrative. | Harley is administrative. | self_contradiction |
Benton is not timid.
Lane is not intelligent.
Lionel is available.
Douglas is not available.
Douglas is not shiny.
Harley is timid.
Benton is shiny.
Benton is not intelligent.
Harley is homely.
Benton is homely.
Lionel is not timid.
Brian is not administrative.Someone being both intelligent and not timid is equivalent to being not homely.
If Addison is administrative or Harley is homely, then Harley is timid.
Harley being timid implies that Harley is not shiny and Harley is not intelligent.
If someone who is not administrative is also not timid, then he is not homely.
If someone is administrative and available, then he is both homely and not shiny, and vice versa.
If someone is available, then he is intelligent.
if there is at least one people who is not homely and not administrative, then Douglas is intelligent and Lane is timid.
It can be concluded that Lane is not available once knowing that Lionel is intelligent and Benton is timid.
Brian is timid if and only if Addison is not administrative and Addison is not intelligent.
If all people are not administrative or intelligent, then Benton is not homely.
Someone being both not homely and not administrative is equivalent to being timid.
If there is someone who is shiny, then Douglas is administrative. | Brian is not available. | neutral |
Benton is not timid.
Lane is not intelligent.
Lionel is available.
Douglas is not available.
Douglas is not shiny.
Harley is timid.
Benton is shiny.
Benton is not intelligent.
Harley is homely.
Benton is homely.
Lionel is not timid.
Brian is not administrative.Someone being both intelligent and not timid is equivalent to being not homely.
If Addison is administrative or Harley is homely, then Harley is timid.
Harley being timid implies that Harley is not shiny and Harley is not intelligent.
If someone who is not administrative is also not timid, then he is not homely.
If someone is administrative and available, then he is both homely and not shiny, and vice versa.
If someone is available, then he is intelligent.
if there is at least one people who is not homely and not administrative, then Douglas is intelligent and Lane is timid.
It can be concluded that Lane is not available once knowing that Lionel is intelligent and Benton is timid.
Brian is timid if and only if Addison is not administrative and Addison is not intelligent.
If all people are not administrative or intelligent, then Benton is not homely.
Someone being both not homely and not administrative is equivalent to being timid.
If there is someone who is shiny, then Douglas is administrative. | Brian is not administrative. | entailment |
Benton is not timid.
Lane is not intelligent.
Lionel is available.
Douglas is not available.
Douglas is not shiny.
Harley is timid.
Benton is shiny.
Benton is not intelligent.
Harley is homely.
Benton is homely.
Lionel is not timid.
Brian is not administrative.Someone being both intelligent and not timid is equivalent to being not homely.
If Addison is administrative or Harley is homely, then Harley is timid.
Harley being timid implies that Harley is not shiny and Harley is not intelligent.
If someone who is not administrative is also not timid, then he is not homely.
If someone is administrative and available, then he is both homely and not shiny, and vice versa.
If someone is available, then he is intelligent.
if there is at least one people who is not homely and not administrative, then Douglas is intelligent and Lane is timid.
It can be concluded that Lane is not available once knowing that Lionel is intelligent and Benton is timid.
Brian is timid if and only if Addison is not administrative and Addison is not intelligent.
If all people are not administrative or intelligent, then Benton is not homely.
Someone being both not homely and not administrative is equivalent to being timid.
If there is someone who is shiny, then Douglas is administrative. | Lionel is intelligent. | entailment |
Benton is not timid.
Lane is not intelligent.
Lionel is available.
Douglas is not available.
Douglas is not shiny.
Harley is timid.
Benton is shiny.
Benton is not intelligent.
Harley is homely.
Benton is homely.
Lionel is not timid.
Brian is not administrative.Someone being both intelligent and not timid is equivalent to being not homely.
If Addison is administrative or Harley is homely, then Harley is timid.
Harley being timid implies that Harley is not shiny and Harley is not intelligent.
If someone who is not administrative is also not timid, then he is not homely.
If someone is administrative and available, then he is both homely and not shiny, and vice versa.
If someone is available, then he is intelligent.
if there is at least one people who is not homely and not administrative, then Douglas is intelligent and Lane is timid.
It can be concluded that Lane is not available once knowing that Lionel is intelligent and Benton is timid.
Brian is timid if and only if Addison is not administrative and Addison is not intelligent.
If all people are not administrative or intelligent, then Benton is not homely.
Someone being both not homely and not administrative is equivalent to being timid.
If there is someone who is shiny, then Douglas is administrative. | Lane is not intelligent. | self_contradiction |
Benton is not timid.
Lane is not intelligent.
Lionel is available.
Douglas is not available.
Douglas is not shiny.
Harley is timid.
Benton is shiny.
Benton is not intelligent.
Harley is homely.
Benton is homely.
Lionel is not timid.
Brian is not administrative.Someone being both intelligent and not timid is equivalent to being not homely.
If Addison is administrative or Harley is homely, then Harley is timid.
Harley being timid implies that Harley is not shiny and Harley is not intelligent.
If someone who is not administrative is also not timid, then he is not homely.
If someone is administrative and available, then he is both homely and not shiny, and vice versa.
If someone is available, then he is intelligent.
if there is at least one people who is not homely and not administrative, then Douglas is intelligent and Lane is timid.
It can be concluded that Lane is not available once knowing that Lionel is intelligent and Benton is timid.
Brian is timid if and only if Addison is not administrative and Addison is not intelligent.
If all people are not administrative or intelligent, then Benton is not homely.
Someone being both not homely and not administrative is equivalent to being timid.
If there is someone who is shiny, then Douglas is administrative. | Harley is timid. | self_contradiction |
Benton is not timid.
Lane is not intelligent.
Lionel is available.
Douglas is not available.
Douglas is not shiny.
Harley is timid.
Benton is shiny.
Benton is not intelligent.
Harley is homely.
Benton is homely.
Lionel is not timid.
Brian is not administrative.Someone being both intelligent and not timid is equivalent to being not homely.
If Addison is administrative or Harley is homely, then Harley is timid.
Harley being timid implies that Harley is not shiny and Harley is not intelligent.
If someone who is not administrative is also not timid, then he is not homely.
If someone is administrative and available, then he is both homely and not shiny, and vice versa.
If someone is available, then he is intelligent.
if there is at least one people who is not homely and not administrative, then Douglas is intelligent and Lane is timid.
It can be concluded that Lane is not available once knowing that Lionel is intelligent and Benton is timid.
Brian is timid if and only if Addison is not administrative and Addison is not intelligent.
If all people are not administrative or intelligent, then Benton is not homely.
Someone being both not homely and not administrative is equivalent to being timid.
If there is someone who is shiny, then Douglas is administrative. | Brian is not timid. | neutral |
Benton is not timid.
Lane is not intelligent.
Lionel is available.
Douglas is not available.
Douglas is not shiny.
Harley is timid.
Benton is shiny.
Benton is not intelligent.
Harley is homely.
Benton is homely.
Lionel is not timid.
Brian is not administrative.Someone being both intelligent and not timid is equivalent to being not homely.
If Addison is administrative or Harley is homely, then Harley is timid.
Harley being timid implies that Harley is not shiny and Harley is not intelligent.
If someone who is not administrative is also not timid, then he is not homely.
If someone is administrative and available, then he is both homely and not shiny, and vice versa.
If someone is available, then he is intelligent.
if there is at least one people who is not homely and not administrative, then Douglas is intelligent and Lane is timid.
It can be concluded that Lane is not available once knowing that Lionel is intelligent and Benton is timid.
Brian is timid if and only if Addison is not administrative and Addison is not intelligent.
If all people are not administrative or intelligent, then Benton is not homely.
Someone being both not homely and not administrative is equivalent to being timid.
If there is someone who is shiny, then Douglas is administrative. | Harley is not timid. | self_contradiction |
Benton is not timid.
Lane is not intelligent.
Lionel is available.
Douglas is not available.
Douglas is not shiny.
Harley is timid.
Benton is shiny.
Benton is not intelligent.
Harley is homely.
Benton is homely.
Lionel is not timid.
Brian is not administrative.Someone being both intelligent and not timid is equivalent to being not homely.
If Addison is administrative or Harley is homely, then Harley is timid.
Harley being timid implies that Harley is not shiny and Harley is not intelligent.
If someone who is not administrative is also not timid, then he is not homely.
If someone is administrative and available, then he is both homely and not shiny, and vice versa.
If someone is available, then he is intelligent.
if there is at least one people who is not homely and not administrative, then Douglas is intelligent and Lane is timid.
It can be concluded that Lane is not available once knowing that Lionel is intelligent and Benton is timid.
Brian is timid if and only if Addison is not administrative and Addison is not intelligent.
If all people are not administrative or intelligent, then Benton is not homely.
Someone being both not homely and not administrative is equivalent to being timid.
If there is someone who is shiny, then Douglas is administrative. | Lionel is homely. | contradiction |
Benton is not timid.
Lane is not intelligent.
Lionel is available.
Douglas is not available.
Douglas is not shiny.
Harley is timid.
Benton is shiny.
Benton is not intelligent.
Harley is homely.
Benton is homely.
Lionel is not timid.
Brian is not administrative.Someone being both intelligent and not timid is equivalent to being not homely.
If Addison is administrative or Harley is homely, then Harley is timid.
Harley being timid implies that Harley is not shiny and Harley is not intelligent.
If someone who is not administrative is also not timid, then he is not homely.
If someone is administrative and available, then he is both homely and not shiny, and vice versa.
If someone is available, then he is intelligent.
if there is at least one people who is not homely and not administrative, then Douglas is intelligent and Lane is timid.
It can be concluded that Lane is not available once knowing that Lionel is intelligent and Benton is timid.
Brian is timid if and only if Addison is not administrative and Addison is not intelligent.
If all people are not administrative or intelligent, then Benton is not homely.
Someone being both not homely and not administrative is equivalent to being timid.
If there is someone who is shiny, then Douglas is administrative. | Lane is homely. | contradiction |
Adrian is not consistent.
Garrick is consistent.
Quinlan is not pleasant.
Alfred is consistent.
Kyle is not romantic.
Quinlan is not friendly.
Quinlan is disturbed.
Alfred is romantic.
Shelley is not disturbed.
Buck is friendly.
Shelley is not friendly.
Garrick is not friendly.Someone is friendly and not pleasant if and only if he is not disturbed and romantic.
Someone is not disturbed if and only if he is dangerous.
All consistent people are dangerous.
If there is nobody who is not disturbed, then Alfred is not friendly and Quinlan is not pleasant.
If someone is not consistent or he is not romantic, then he is not dangerous.
Kyle being romantic is equivalent to Shelley being friendly.
If there is at least one people who is not consistent, then Alfred is not friendly.
Someone is romantic and not disturbed if and only if he is consistent and friendly.
If someone is not dangerous and disturbed, then he is consistent, and vice versa.
If someone is not dangerous or he is not disturbed, then he is not consistent.
If someone is not disturbed, then he is pleasant.
Buck being romantic is equivalent to Adrian being not consistent. | Shelley is not disturbed. | entailment |
Adrian is not consistent.
Garrick is consistent.
Quinlan is not pleasant.
Alfred is consistent.
Kyle is not romantic.
Quinlan is not friendly.
Quinlan is disturbed.
Alfred is romantic.
Shelley is not disturbed.
Buck is friendly.
Shelley is not friendly.
Garrick is not friendly.Someone is friendly and not pleasant if and only if he is not disturbed and romantic.
Someone is not disturbed if and only if he is dangerous.
All consistent people are dangerous.
If there is nobody who is not disturbed, then Alfred is not friendly and Quinlan is not pleasant.
If someone is not consistent or he is not romantic, then he is not dangerous.
Kyle being romantic is equivalent to Shelley being friendly.
If there is at least one people who is not consistent, then Alfred is not friendly.
Someone is romantic and not disturbed if and only if he is consistent and friendly.
If someone is not dangerous and disturbed, then he is consistent, and vice versa.
If someone is not dangerous or he is not disturbed, then he is not consistent.
If someone is not disturbed, then he is pleasant.
Buck being romantic is equivalent to Adrian being not consistent. | Shelley is not friendly. | entailment |
Adrian is not consistent.
Garrick is consistent.
Quinlan is not pleasant.
Alfred is consistent.
Kyle is not romantic.
Quinlan is not friendly.
Quinlan is disturbed.
Alfred is romantic.
Shelley is not disturbed.
Buck is friendly.
Shelley is not friendly.
Garrick is not friendly.Someone is friendly and not pleasant if and only if he is not disturbed and romantic.
Someone is not disturbed if and only if he is dangerous.
All consistent people are dangerous.
If there is nobody who is not disturbed, then Alfred is not friendly and Quinlan is not pleasant.
If someone is not consistent or he is not romantic, then he is not dangerous.
Kyle being romantic is equivalent to Shelley being friendly.
If there is at least one people who is not consistent, then Alfred is not friendly.
Someone is romantic and not disturbed if and only if he is consistent and friendly.
If someone is not dangerous and disturbed, then he is consistent, and vice versa.
If someone is not dangerous or he is not disturbed, then he is not consistent.
If someone is not disturbed, then he is pleasant.
Buck being romantic is equivalent to Adrian being not consistent. | Adrian is dangerous. | contradiction |
Adrian is not consistent.
Garrick is consistent.
Quinlan is not pleasant.
Alfred is consistent.
Kyle is not romantic.
Quinlan is not friendly.
Quinlan is disturbed.
Alfred is romantic.
Shelley is not disturbed.
Buck is friendly.
Shelley is not friendly.
Garrick is not friendly.Someone is friendly and not pleasant if and only if he is not disturbed and romantic.
Someone is not disturbed if and only if he is dangerous.
All consistent people are dangerous.
If there is nobody who is not disturbed, then Alfred is not friendly and Quinlan is not pleasant.
If someone is not consistent or he is not romantic, then he is not dangerous.
Kyle being romantic is equivalent to Shelley being friendly.
If there is at least one people who is not consistent, then Alfred is not friendly.
Someone is romantic and not disturbed if and only if he is consistent and friendly.
If someone is not dangerous and disturbed, then he is consistent, and vice versa.
If someone is not dangerous or he is not disturbed, then he is not consistent.
If someone is not disturbed, then he is pleasant.
Buck being romantic is equivalent to Adrian being not consistent. | Alfred is not consistent. | self_contradiction |
Adrian is not consistent.
Garrick is consistent.
Quinlan is not pleasant.
Alfred is consistent.
Kyle is not romantic.
Quinlan is not friendly.
Quinlan is disturbed.
Alfred is romantic.
Shelley is not disturbed.
Buck is friendly.
Shelley is not friendly.
Garrick is not friendly.Someone is friendly and not pleasant if and only if he is not disturbed and romantic.
Someone is not disturbed if and only if he is dangerous.
All consistent people are dangerous.
If there is nobody who is not disturbed, then Alfred is not friendly and Quinlan is not pleasant.
If someone is not consistent or he is not romantic, then he is not dangerous.
Kyle being romantic is equivalent to Shelley being friendly.
If there is at least one people who is not consistent, then Alfred is not friendly.
Someone is romantic and not disturbed if and only if he is consistent and friendly.
If someone is not dangerous and disturbed, then he is consistent, and vice versa.
If someone is not dangerous or he is not disturbed, then he is not consistent.
If someone is not disturbed, then he is pleasant.
Buck being romantic is equivalent to Adrian being not consistent. | Quinlan is pleasant. | contradiction |
Adrian is not consistent.
Garrick is consistent.
Quinlan is not pleasant.
Alfred is consistent.
Kyle is not romantic.
Quinlan is not friendly.
Quinlan is disturbed.
Alfred is romantic.
Shelley is not disturbed.
Buck is friendly.
Shelley is not friendly.
Garrick is not friendly.Someone is friendly and not pleasant if and only if he is not disturbed and romantic.
Someone is not disturbed if and only if he is dangerous.
All consistent people are dangerous.
If there is nobody who is not disturbed, then Alfred is not friendly and Quinlan is not pleasant.
If someone is not consistent or he is not romantic, then he is not dangerous.
Kyle being romantic is equivalent to Shelley being friendly.
If there is at least one people who is not consistent, then Alfred is not friendly.
Someone is romantic and not disturbed if and only if he is consistent and friendly.
If someone is not dangerous and disturbed, then he is consistent, and vice versa.
If someone is not dangerous or he is not disturbed, then he is not consistent.
If someone is not disturbed, then he is pleasant.
Buck being romantic is equivalent to Adrian being not consistent. | Alfred is not disturbed. | self_contradiction |
Adrian is not consistent.
Garrick is consistent.
Quinlan is not pleasant.
Alfred is consistent.
Kyle is not romantic.
Quinlan is not friendly.
Quinlan is disturbed.
Alfred is romantic.
Shelley is not disturbed.
Buck is friendly.
Shelley is not friendly.
Garrick is not friendly.Someone is friendly and not pleasant if and only if he is not disturbed and romantic.
Someone is not disturbed if and only if he is dangerous.
All consistent people are dangerous.
If there is nobody who is not disturbed, then Alfred is not friendly and Quinlan is not pleasant.
If someone is not consistent or he is not romantic, then he is not dangerous.
Kyle being romantic is equivalent to Shelley being friendly.
If there is at least one people who is not consistent, then Alfred is not friendly.
Someone is romantic and not disturbed if and only if he is consistent and friendly.
If someone is not dangerous and disturbed, then he is consistent, and vice versa.
If someone is not dangerous or he is not disturbed, then he is not consistent.
If someone is not disturbed, then he is pleasant.
Buck being romantic is equivalent to Adrian being not consistent. | Kyle is dangerous. | contradiction |
Adrian is not consistent.
Garrick is consistent.
Quinlan is not pleasant.
Alfred is consistent.
Kyle is not romantic.
Quinlan is not friendly.
Quinlan is disturbed.
Alfred is romantic.
Shelley is not disturbed.
Buck is friendly.
Shelley is not friendly.
Garrick is not friendly.Someone is friendly and not pleasant if and only if he is not disturbed and romantic.
Someone is not disturbed if and only if he is dangerous.
All consistent people are dangerous.
If there is nobody who is not disturbed, then Alfred is not friendly and Quinlan is not pleasant.
If someone is not consistent or he is not romantic, then he is not dangerous.
Kyle being romantic is equivalent to Shelley being friendly.
If there is at least one people who is not consistent, then Alfred is not friendly.
Someone is romantic and not disturbed if and only if he is consistent and friendly.
If someone is not dangerous and disturbed, then he is consistent, and vice versa.
If someone is not dangerous or he is not disturbed, then he is not consistent.
If someone is not disturbed, then he is pleasant.
Buck being romantic is equivalent to Adrian being not consistent. | Buck is pleasant. | neutral |
Adrian is not consistent.
Garrick is consistent.
Quinlan is not pleasant.
Alfred is consistent.
Kyle is not romantic.
Quinlan is not friendly.
Quinlan is disturbed.
Alfred is romantic.
Shelley is not disturbed.
Buck is friendly.
Shelley is not friendly.
Garrick is not friendly.Someone is friendly and not pleasant if and only if he is not disturbed and romantic.
Someone is not disturbed if and only if he is dangerous.
All consistent people are dangerous.
If there is nobody who is not disturbed, then Alfred is not friendly and Quinlan is not pleasant.
If someone is not consistent or he is not romantic, then he is not dangerous.
Kyle being romantic is equivalent to Shelley being friendly.
If there is at least one people who is not consistent, then Alfred is not friendly.
Someone is romantic and not disturbed if and only if he is consistent and friendly.
If someone is not dangerous and disturbed, then he is consistent, and vice versa.
If someone is not dangerous or he is not disturbed, then he is not consistent.
If someone is not disturbed, then he is pleasant.
Buck being romantic is equivalent to Adrian being not consistent. | Shelley is not romantic. | neutral |
Adrian is not consistent.
Garrick is consistent.
Quinlan is not pleasant.
Alfred is consistent.
Kyle is not romantic.
Quinlan is not friendly.
Quinlan is disturbed.
Alfred is romantic.
Shelley is not disturbed.
Buck is friendly.
Shelley is not friendly.
Garrick is not friendly.Someone is friendly and not pleasant if and only if he is not disturbed and romantic.
Someone is not disturbed if and only if he is dangerous.
All consistent people are dangerous.
If there is nobody who is not disturbed, then Alfred is not friendly and Quinlan is not pleasant.
If someone is not consistent or he is not romantic, then he is not dangerous.
Kyle being romantic is equivalent to Shelley being friendly.
If there is at least one people who is not consistent, then Alfred is not friendly.
Someone is romantic and not disturbed if and only if he is consistent and friendly.
If someone is not dangerous and disturbed, then he is consistent, and vice versa.
If someone is not dangerous or he is not disturbed, then he is not consistent.
If someone is not disturbed, then he is pleasant.
Buck being romantic is equivalent to Adrian being not consistent. | Garrick is not dangerous. | self_contradiction |
Adrian is not consistent.
Garrick is consistent.
Quinlan is not pleasant.
Alfred is consistent.
Kyle is not romantic.
Quinlan is not friendly.
Quinlan is disturbed.
Alfred is romantic.
Shelley is not disturbed.
Buck is friendly.
Shelley is not friendly.
Garrick is not friendly.Someone is friendly and not pleasant if and only if he is not disturbed and romantic.
Someone is not disturbed if and only if he is dangerous.
All consistent people are dangerous.
If there is nobody who is not disturbed, then Alfred is not friendly and Quinlan is not pleasant.
If someone is not consistent or he is not romantic, then he is not dangerous.
Kyle being romantic is equivalent to Shelley being friendly.
If there is at least one people who is not consistent, then Alfred is not friendly.
Someone is romantic and not disturbed if and only if he is consistent and friendly.
If someone is not dangerous and disturbed, then he is consistent, and vice versa.
If someone is not dangerous or he is not disturbed, then he is not consistent.
If someone is not disturbed, then he is pleasant.
Buck being romantic is equivalent to Adrian being not consistent. | Kyle is not romantic. | entailment |
Adrian is not consistent.
Garrick is consistent.
Quinlan is not pleasant.
Alfred is consistent.
Kyle is not romantic.
Quinlan is not friendly.
Quinlan is disturbed.
Alfred is romantic.
Shelley is not disturbed.
Buck is friendly.
Shelley is not friendly.
Garrick is not friendly.Someone is friendly and not pleasant if and only if he is not disturbed and romantic.
Someone is not disturbed if and only if he is dangerous.
All consistent people are dangerous.
If there is nobody who is not disturbed, then Alfred is not friendly and Quinlan is not pleasant.
If someone is not consistent or he is not romantic, then he is not dangerous.
Kyle being romantic is equivalent to Shelley being friendly.
If there is at least one people who is not consistent, then Alfred is not friendly.
Someone is romantic and not disturbed if and only if he is consistent and friendly.
If someone is not dangerous and disturbed, then he is consistent, and vice versa.
If someone is not dangerous or he is not disturbed, then he is not consistent.
If someone is not disturbed, then he is pleasant.
Buck being romantic is equivalent to Adrian being not consistent. | Kyle is not dangerous. | entailment |
Adrian is not consistent.
Garrick is consistent.
Quinlan is not pleasant.
Alfred is consistent.
Kyle is not romantic.
Quinlan is not friendly.
Quinlan is disturbed.
Alfred is romantic.
Shelley is not disturbed.
Buck is friendly.
Shelley is not friendly.
Garrick is not friendly.Someone is friendly and not pleasant if and only if he is not disturbed and romantic.
Someone is not disturbed if and only if he is dangerous.
All consistent people are dangerous.
If there is nobody who is not disturbed, then Alfred is not friendly and Quinlan is not pleasant.
If someone is not consistent or he is not romantic, then he is not dangerous.
Kyle being romantic is equivalent to Shelley being friendly.
If there is at least one people who is not consistent, then Alfred is not friendly.
Someone is romantic and not disturbed if and only if he is consistent and friendly.
If someone is not dangerous and disturbed, then he is consistent, and vice versa.
If someone is not dangerous or he is not disturbed, then he is not consistent.
If someone is not disturbed, then he is pleasant.
Buck being romantic is equivalent to Adrian being not consistent. | Adrian is friendly. | neutral |
Adrian is not consistent.
Garrick is consistent.
Quinlan is not pleasant.
Alfred is consistent.
Kyle is not romantic.
Quinlan is not friendly.
Quinlan is disturbed.
Alfred is romantic.
Shelley is not disturbed.
Buck is friendly.
Shelley is not friendly.
Garrick is not friendly.Someone is friendly and not pleasant if and only if he is not disturbed and romantic.
Someone is not disturbed if and only if he is dangerous.
All consistent people are dangerous.
If there is nobody who is not disturbed, then Alfred is not friendly and Quinlan is not pleasant.
If someone is not consistent or he is not romantic, then he is not dangerous.
Kyle being romantic is equivalent to Shelley being friendly.
If there is at least one people who is not consistent, then Alfred is not friendly.
Someone is romantic and not disturbed if and only if he is consistent and friendly.
If someone is not dangerous and disturbed, then he is consistent, and vice versa.
If someone is not dangerous or he is not disturbed, then he is not consistent.
If someone is not disturbed, then he is pleasant.
Buck being romantic is equivalent to Adrian being not consistent. | Shelley is dangerous. | self_contradiction |
Adrian is not consistent.
Garrick is consistent.
Quinlan is not pleasant.
Alfred is consistent.
Kyle is not romantic.
Quinlan is not friendly.
Quinlan is disturbed.
Alfred is romantic.
Shelley is not disturbed.
Buck is friendly.
Shelley is not friendly.
Garrick is not friendly.Someone is friendly and not pleasant if and only if he is not disturbed and romantic.
Someone is not disturbed if and only if he is dangerous.
All consistent people are dangerous.
If there is nobody who is not disturbed, then Alfred is not friendly and Quinlan is not pleasant.
If someone is not consistent or he is not romantic, then he is not dangerous.
Kyle being romantic is equivalent to Shelley being friendly.
If there is at least one people who is not consistent, then Alfred is not friendly.
Someone is romantic and not disturbed if and only if he is consistent and friendly.
If someone is not dangerous and disturbed, then he is consistent, and vice versa.
If someone is not dangerous or he is not disturbed, then he is not consistent.
If someone is not disturbed, then he is pleasant.
Buck being romantic is equivalent to Adrian being not consistent. | Garrick is friendly. | contradiction |
Adrian is not consistent.
Garrick is consistent.
Quinlan is not pleasant.
Alfred is consistent.
Kyle is not romantic.
Quinlan is not friendly.
Quinlan is disturbed.
Alfred is romantic.
Shelley is not disturbed.
Buck is friendly.
Shelley is not friendly.
Garrick is not friendly.Someone is friendly and not pleasant if and only if he is not disturbed and romantic.
Someone is not disturbed if and only if he is dangerous.
All consistent people are dangerous.
If there is nobody who is not disturbed, then Alfred is not friendly and Quinlan is not pleasant.
If someone is not consistent or he is not romantic, then he is not dangerous.
Kyle being romantic is equivalent to Shelley being friendly.
If there is at least one people who is not consistent, then Alfred is not friendly.
Someone is romantic and not disturbed if and only if he is consistent and friendly.
If someone is not dangerous and disturbed, then he is consistent, and vice versa.
If someone is not dangerous or he is not disturbed, then he is not consistent.
If someone is not disturbed, then he is pleasant.
Buck being romantic is equivalent to Adrian being not consistent. | Quinlan is not disturbed. | contradiction |
Adrian is not consistent.
Garrick is consistent.
Quinlan is not pleasant.
Alfred is consistent.
Kyle is not romantic.
Quinlan is not friendly.
Quinlan is disturbed.
Alfred is romantic.
Shelley is not disturbed.
Buck is friendly.
Shelley is not friendly.
Garrick is not friendly.Someone is friendly and not pleasant if and only if he is not disturbed and romantic.
Someone is not disturbed if and only if he is dangerous.
All consistent people are dangerous.
If there is nobody who is not disturbed, then Alfred is not friendly and Quinlan is not pleasant.
If someone is not consistent or he is not romantic, then he is not dangerous.
Kyle being romantic is equivalent to Shelley being friendly.
If there is at least one people who is not consistent, then Alfred is not friendly.
Someone is romantic and not disturbed if and only if he is consistent and friendly.
If someone is not dangerous and disturbed, then he is consistent, and vice versa.
If someone is not dangerous or he is not disturbed, then he is not consistent.
If someone is not disturbed, then he is pleasant.
Buck being romantic is equivalent to Adrian being not consistent. | Quinlan is not romantic. | neutral |
Adrian is not consistent.
Garrick is consistent.
Quinlan is not pleasant.
Alfred is consistent.
Kyle is not romantic.
Quinlan is not friendly.
Quinlan is disturbed.
Alfred is romantic.
Shelley is not disturbed.
Buck is friendly.
Shelley is not friendly.
Garrick is not friendly.Someone is friendly and not pleasant if and only if he is not disturbed and romantic.
Someone is not disturbed if and only if he is dangerous.
All consistent people are dangerous.
If there is nobody who is not disturbed, then Alfred is not friendly and Quinlan is not pleasant.
If someone is not consistent or he is not romantic, then he is not dangerous.
Kyle being romantic is equivalent to Shelley being friendly.
If there is at least one people who is not consistent, then Alfred is not friendly.
Someone is romantic and not disturbed if and only if he is consistent and friendly.
If someone is not dangerous and disturbed, then he is consistent, and vice versa.
If someone is not dangerous or he is not disturbed, then he is not consistent.
If someone is not disturbed, then he is pleasant.
Buck being romantic is equivalent to Adrian being not consistent. | Quinlan is not dangerous. | neutral |
Adrian is not consistent.
Garrick is consistent.
Quinlan is not pleasant.
Alfred is consistent.
Kyle is not romantic.
Quinlan is not friendly.
Quinlan is disturbed.
Alfred is romantic.
Shelley is not disturbed.
Buck is friendly.
Shelley is not friendly.
Garrick is not friendly.Someone is friendly and not pleasant if and only if he is not disturbed and romantic.
Someone is not disturbed if and only if he is dangerous.
All consistent people are dangerous.
If there is nobody who is not disturbed, then Alfred is not friendly and Quinlan is not pleasant.
If someone is not consistent or he is not romantic, then he is not dangerous.
Kyle being romantic is equivalent to Shelley being friendly.
If there is at least one people who is not consistent, then Alfred is not friendly.
Someone is romantic and not disturbed if and only if he is consistent and friendly.
If someone is not dangerous and disturbed, then he is consistent, and vice versa.
If someone is not dangerous or he is not disturbed, then he is not consistent.
If someone is not disturbed, then he is pleasant.
Buck being romantic is equivalent to Adrian being not consistent. | Garrick is not friendly. | entailment |
Adrian is not consistent.
Garrick is consistent.
Quinlan is not pleasant.
Alfred is consistent.
Kyle is not romantic.
Quinlan is not friendly.
Quinlan is disturbed.
Alfred is romantic.
Shelley is not disturbed.
Buck is friendly.
Shelley is not friendly.
Garrick is not friendly.Someone is friendly and not pleasant if and only if he is not disturbed and romantic.
Someone is not disturbed if and only if he is dangerous.
All consistent people are dangerous.
If there is nobody who is not disturbed, then Alfred is not friendly and Quinlan is not pleasant.
If someone is not consistent or he is not romantic, then he is not dangerous.
Kyle being romantic is equivalent to Shelley being friendly.
If there is at least one people who is not consistent, then Alfred is not friendly.
Someone is romantic and not disturbed if and only if he is consistent and friendly.
If someone is not dangerous and disturbed, then he is consistent, and vice versa.
If someone is not dangerous or he is not disturbed, then he is not consistent.
If someone is not disturbed, then he is pleasant.
Buck being romantic is equivalent to Adrian being not consistent. | Alfred is consistent. | self_contradiction |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.