premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Lester is not grumpy.
Lester is frightened.
Quade is jealous.
Quade is not frightened.
Lester is bright.
Neil is bright.
Kerry is not delightful.
Jorge is jealous.
Chatwin is grumpy.
Neil is grumpy.
Kerry is not jealous.
Silvia is not grumpy.If someone is frightened, then he is not grumpy, and vice versa.
Lester being grumpy is equivalent to Chatwin being not jealous and Silvia being not hypocritical.
If someone is not delightful or not hypocritical, then he is not grumpy.
Someone who is hypocritical is always both frightened and not delightful.
If someone is not hypocritical, then he is not jealous, and vice versa.
Someone being both not jealous and not delightful is equivalent to being hypocritical and bright.
If there is at least one people who is both not bright and jealous, then Quade is not frightened.
If there is someone who is not delightful, then Silvia is not jealous.
If Jorge is not delightful, then Kerry is not bright.
If there is at least one people who is not grumpy or not frightened, then Quade is not hypocritical.
Quade being not grumpy implies that Kerry is frightened and Jorge is delightful.
Chatwin being not frightened or Jorge being not hypocritical implies that Jorge is grumpy. | Chatwin is not frightened. | neutral |
Lester is not grumpy.
Lester is frightened.
Quade is jealous.
Quade is not frightened.
Lester is bright.
Neil is bright.
Kerry is not delightful.
Jorge is jealous.
Chatwin is grumpy.
Neil is grumpy.
Kerry is not jealous.
Silvia is not grumpy.If someone is frightened, then he is not grumpy, and vice versa.
Lester being grumpy is equivalent to Chatwin being not jealous and Silvia being not hypocritical.
If someone is not delightful or not hypocritical, then he is not grumpy.
Someone who is hypocritical is always both frightened and not delightful.
If someone is not hypocritical, then he is not jealous, and vice versa.
Someone being both not jealous and not delightful is equivalent to being hypocritical and bright.
If there is at least one people who is both not bright and jealous, then Quade is not frightened.
If there is someone who is not delightful, then Silvia is not jealous.
If Jorge is not delightful, then Kerry is not bright.
If there is at least one people who is not grumpy or not frightened, then Quade is not hypocritical.
Quade being not grumpy implies that Kerry is frightened and Jorge is delightful.
Chatwin being not frightened or Jorge being not hypocritical implies that Jorge is grumpy. | Kerry is delightful. | contradiction |
Lester is not grumpy.
Lester is frightened.
Quade is jealous.
Quade is not frightened.
Lester is bright.
Neil is bright.
Kerry is not delightful.
Jorge is jealous.
Chatwin is grumpy.
Neil is grumpy.
Kerry is not jealous.
Silvia is not grumpy.If someone is frightened, then he is not grumpy, and vice versa.
Lester being grumpy is equivalent to Chatwin being not jealous and Silvia being not hypocritical.
If someone is not delightful or not hypocritical, then he is not grumpy.
Someone who is hypocritical is always both frightened and not delightful.
If someone is not hypocritical, then he is not jealous, and vice versa.
Someone being both not jealous and not delightful is equivalent to being hypocritical and bright.
If there is at least one people who is both not bright and jealous, then Quade is not frightened.
If there is someone who is not delightful, then Silvia is not jealous.
If Jorge is not delightful, then Kerry is not bright.
If there is at least one people who is not grumpy or not frightened, then Quade is not hypocritical.
Quade being not grumpy implies that Kerry is frightened and Jorge is delightful.
Chatwin being not frightened or Jorge being not hypocritical implies that Jorge is grumpy. | Quade is not jealous. | self_contradiction |
Lester is not grumpy.
Lester is frightened.
Quade is jealous.
Quade is not frightened.
Lester is bright.
Neil is bright.
Kerry is not delightful.
Jorge is jealous.
Chatwin is grumpy.
Neil is grumpy.
Kerry is not jealous.
Silvia is not grumpy.If someone is frightened, then he is not grumpy, and vice versa.
Lester being grumpy is equivalent to Chatwin being not jealous and Silvia being not hypocritical.
If someone is not delightful or not hypocritical, then he is not grumpy.
Someone who is hypocritical is always both frightened and not delightful.
If someone is not hypocritical, then he is not jealous, and vice versa.
Someone being both not jealous and not delightful is equivalent to being hypocritical and bright.
If there is at least one people who is both not bright and jealous, then Quade is not frightened.
If there is someone who is not delightful, then Silvia is not jealous.
If Jorge is not delightful, then Kerry is not bright.
If there is at least one people who is not grumpy or not frightened, then Quade is not hypocritical.
Quade being not grumpy implies that Kerry is frightened and Jorge is delightful.
Chatwin being not frightened or Jorge being not hypocritical implies that Jorge is grumpy. | Quade is frightened. | self_contradiction |
Lester is not grumpy.
Lester is frightened.
Quade is jealous.
Quade is not frightened.
Lester is bright.
Neil is bright.
Kerry is not delightful.
Jorge is jealous.
Chatwin is grumpy.
Neil is grumpy.
Kerry is not jealous.
Silvia is not grumpy.If someone is frightened, then he is not grumpy, and vice versa.
Lester being grumpy is equivalent to Chatwin being not jealous and Silvia being not hypocritical.
If someone is not delightful or not hypocritical, then he is not grumpy.
Someone who is hypocritical is always both frightened and not delightful.
If someone is not hypocritical, then he is not jealous, and vice versa.
Someone being both not jealous and not delightful is equivalent to being hypocritical and bright.
If there is at least one people who is both not bright and jealous, then Quade is not frightened.
If there is someone who is not delightful, then Silvia is not jealous.
If Jorge is not delightful, then Kerry is not bright.
If there is at least one people who is not grumpy or not frightened, then Quade is not hypocritical.
Quade being not grumpy implies that Kerry is frightened and Jorge is delightful.
Chatwin being not frightened or Jorge being not hypocritical implies that Jorge is grumpy. | Quade is not frightened. | self_contradiction |
Lester is not grumpy.
Lester is frightened.
Quade is jealous.
Quade is not frightened.
Lester is bright.
Neil is bright.
Kerry is not delightful.
Jorge is jealous.
Chatwin is grumpy.
Neil is grumpy.
Kerry is not jealous.
Silvia is not grumpy.If someone is frightened, then he is not grumpy, and vice versa.
Lester being grumpy is equivalent to Chatwin being not jealous and Silvia being not hypocritical.
If someone is not delightful or not hypocritical, then he is not grumpy.
Someone who is hypocritical is always both frightened and not delightful.
If someone is not hypocritical, then he is not jealous, and vice versa.
Someone being both not jealous and not delightful is equivalent to being hypocritical and bright.
If there is at least one people who is both not bright and jealous, then Quade is not frightened.
If there is someone who is not delightful, then Silvia is not jealous.
If Jorge is not delightful, then Kerry is not bright.
If there is at least one people who is not grumpy or not frightened, then Quade is not hypocritical.
Quade being not grumpy implies that Kerry is frightened and Jorge is delightful.
Chatwin being not frightened or Jorge being not hypocritical implies that Jorge is grumpy. | Neil is grumpy. | entailment |
Lester is not grumpy.
Lester is frightened.
Quade is jealous.
Quade is not frightened.
Lester is bright.
Neil is bright.
Kerry is not delightful.
Jorge is jealous.
Chatwin is grumpy.
Neil is grumpy.
Kerry is not jealous.
Silvia is not grumpy.If someone is frightened, then he is not grumpy, and vice versa.
Lester being grumpy is equivalent to Chatwin being not jealous and Silvia being not hypocritical.
If someone is not delightful or not hypocritical, then he is not grumpy.
Someone who is hypocritical is always both frightened and not delightful.
If someone is not hypocritical, then he is not jealous, and vice versa.
Someone being both not jealous and not delightful is equivalent to being hypocritical and bright.
If there is at least one people who is both not bright and jealous, then Quade is not frightened.
If there is someone who is not delightful, then Silvia is not jealous.
If Jorge is not delightful, then Kerry is not bright.
If there is at least one people who is not grumpy or not frightened, then Quade is not hypocritical.
Quade being not grumpy implies that Kerry is frightened and Jorge is delightful.
Chatwin being not frightened or Jorge being not hypocritical implies that Jorge is grumpy. | Silvia is bright. | neutral |
Lester is not grumpy.
Lester is frightened.
Quade is jealous.
Quade is not frightened.
Lester is bright.
Neil is bright.
Kerry is not delightful.
Jorge is jealous.
Chatwin is grumpy.
Neil is grumpy.
Kerry is not jealous.
Silvia is not grumpy.If someone is frightened, then he is not grumpy, and vice versa.
Lester being grumpy is equivalent to Chatwin being not jealous and Silvia being not hypocritical.
If someone is not delightful or not hypocritical, then he is not grumpy.
Someone who is hypocritical is always both frightened and not delightful.
If someone is not hypocritical, then he is not jealous, and vice versa.
Someone being both not jealous and not delightful is equivalent to being hypocritical and bright.
If there is at least one people who is both not bright and jealous, then Quade is not frightened.
If there is someone who is not delightful, then Silvia is not jealous.
If Jorge is not delightful, then Kerry is not bright.
If there is at least one people who is not grumpy or not frightened, then Quade is not hypocritical.
Quade being not grumpy implies that Kerry is frightened and Jorge is delightful.
Chatwin being not frightened or Jorge being not hypocritical implies that Jorge is grumpy. | Neil is not frightened. | neutral |
Lester is not grumpy.
Lester is frightened.
Quade is jealous.
Quade is not frightened.
Lester is bright.
Neil is bright.
Kerry is not delightful.
Jorge is jealous.
Chatwin is grumpy.
Neil is grumpy.
Kerry is not jealous.
Silvia is not grumpy.If someone is frightened, then he is not grumpy, and vice versa.
Lester being grumpy is equivalent to Chatwin being not jealous and Silvia being not hypocritical.
If someone is not delightful or not hypocritical, then he is not grumpy.
Someone who is hypocritical is always both frightened and not delightful.
If someone is not hypocritical, then he is not jealous, and vice versa.
Someone being both not jealous and not delightful is equivalent to being hypocritical and bright.
If there is at least one people who is both not bright and jealous, then Quade is not frightened.
If there is someone who is not delightful, then Silvia is not jealous.
If Jorge is not delightful, then Kerry is not bright.
If there is at least one people who is not grumpy or not frightened, then Quade is not hypocritical.
Quade being not grumpy implies that Kerry is frightened and Jorge is delightful.
Chatwin being not frightened or Jorge being not hypocritical implies that Jorge is grumpy. | Kerry is hypocritical. | self_contradiction |
Lester is not grumpy.
Lester is frightened.
Quade is jealous.
Quade is not frightened.
Lester is bright.
Neil is bright.
Kerry is not delightful.
Jorge is jealous.
Chatwin is grumpy.
Neil is grumpy.
Kerry is not jealous.
Silvia is not grumpy.If someone is frightened, then he is not grumpy, and vice versa.
Lester being grumpy is equivalent to Chatwin being not jealous and Silvia being not hypocritical.
If someone is not delightful or not hypocritical, then he is not grumpy.
Someone who is hypocritical is always both frightened and not delightful.
If someone is not hypocritical, then he is not jealous, and vice versa.
Someone being both not jealous and not delightful is equivalent to being hypocritical and bright.
If there is at least one people who is both not bright and jealous, then Quade is not frightened.
If there is someone who is not delightful, then Silvia is not jealous.
If Jorge is not delightful, then Kerry is not bright.
If there is at least one people who is not grumpy or not frightened, then Quade is not hypocritical.
Quade being not grumpy implies that Kerry is frightened and Jorge is delightful.
Chatwin being not frightened or Jorge being not hypocritical implies that Jorge is grumpy. | Kerry is bright. | entailment |
Lester is not grumpy.
Lester is frightened.
Quade is jealous.
Quade is not frightened.
Lester is bright.
Neil is bright.
Kerry is not delightful.
Jorge is jealous.
Chatwin is grumpy.
Neil is grumpy.
Kerry is not jealous.
Silvia is not grumpy.If someone is frightened, then he is not grumpy, and vice versa.
Lester being grumpy is equivalent to Chatwin being not jealous and Silvia being not hypocritical.
If someone is not delightful or not hypocritical, then he is not grumpy.
Someone who is hypocritical is always both frightened and not delightful.
If someone is not hypocritical, then he is not jealous, and vice versa.
Someone being both not jealous and not delightful is equivalent to being hypocritical and bright.
If there is at least one people who is both not bright and jealous, then Quade is not frightened.
If there is someone who is not delightful, then Silvia is not jealous.
If Jorge is not delightful, then Kerry is not bright.
If there is at least one people who is not grumpy or not frightened, then Quade is not hypocritical.
Quade being not grumpy implies that Kerry is frightened and Jorge is delightful.
Chatwin being not frightened or Jorge being not hypocritical implies that Jorge is grumpy. | Lester is frightened. | entailment |
Lester is not grumpy.
Lester is frightened.
Quade is jealous.
Quade is not frightened.
Lester is bright.
Neil is bright.
Kerry is not delightful.
Jorge is jealous.
Chatwin is grumpy.
Neil is grumpy.
Kerry is not jealous.
Silvia is not grumpy.If someone is frightened, then he is not grumpy, and vice versa.
Lester being grumpy is equivalent to Chatwin being not jealous and Silvia being not hypocritical.
If someone is not delightful or not hypocritical, then he is not grumpy.
Someone who is hypocritical is always both frightened and not delightful.
If someone is not hypocritical, then he is not jealous, and vice versa.
Someone being both not jealous and not delightful is equivalent to being hypocritical and bright.
If there is at least one people who is both not bright and jealous, then Quade is not frightened.
If there is someone who is not delightful, then Silvia is not jealous.
If Jorge is not delightful, then Kerry is not bright.
If there is at least one people who is not grumpy or not frightened, then Quade is not hypocritical.
Quade being not grumpy implies that Kerry is frightened and Jorge is delightful.
Chatwin being not frightened or Jorge being not hypocritical implies that Jorge is grumpy. | Chatwin is delightful. | neutral |
Lester is not grumpy.
Lester is frightened.
Quade is jealous.
Quade is not frightened.
Lester is bright.
Neil is bright.
Kerry is not delightful.
Jorge is jealous.
Chatwin is grumpy.
Neil is grumpy.
Kerry is not jealous.
Silvia is not grumpy.If someone is frightened, then he is not grumpy, and vice versa.
Lester being grumpy is equivalent to Chatwin being not jealous and Silvia being not hypocritical.
If someone is not delightful or not hypocritical, then he is not grumpy.
Someone who is hypocritical is always both frightened and not delightful.
If someone is not hypocritical, then he is not jealous, and vice versa.
Someone being both not jealous and not delightful is equivalent to being hypocritical and bright.
If there is at least one people who is both not bright and jealous, then Quade is not frightened.
If there is someone who is not delightful, then Silvia is not jealous.
If Jorge is not delightful, then Kerry is not bright.
If there is at least one people who is not grumpy or not frightened, then Quade is not hypocritical.
Quade being not grumpy implies that Kerry is frightened and Jorge is delightful.
Chatwin being not frightened or Jorge being not hypocritical implies that Jorge is grumpy. | Silvia is not hypocritical. | entailment |
Lester is not grumpy.
Lester is frightened.
Quade is jealous.
Quade is not frightened.
Lester is bright.
Neil is bright.
Kerry is not delightful.
Jorge is jealous.
Chatwin is grumpy.
Neil is grumpy.
Kerry is not jealous.
Silvia is not grumpy.If someone is frightened, then he is not grumpy, and vice versa.
Lester being grumpy is equivalent to Chatwin being not jealous and Silvia being not hypocritical.
If someone is not delightful or not hypocritical, then he is not grumpy.
Someone who is hypocritical is always both frightened and not delightful.
If someone is not hypocritical, then he is not jealous, and vice versa.
Someone being both not jealous and not delightful is equivalent to being hypocritical and bright.
If there is at least one people who is both not bright and jealous, then Quade is not frightened.
If there is someone who is not delightful, then Silvia is not jealous.
If Jorge is not delightful, then Kerry is not bright.
If there is at least one people who is not grumpy or not frightened, then Quade is not hypocritical.
Quade being not grumpy implies that Kerry is frightened and Jorge is delightful.
Chatwin being not frightened or Jorge being not hypocritical implies that Jorge is grumpy. | Kerry is not bright. | contradiction |
Lester is not grumpy.
Lester is frightened.
Quade is jealous.
Quade is not frightened.
Lester is bright.
Neil is bright.
Kerry is not delightful.
Jorge is jealous.
Chatwin is grumpy.
Neil is grumpy.
Kerry is not jealous.
Silvia is not grumpy.If someone is frightened, then he is not grumpy, and vice versa.
Lester being grumpy is equivalent to Chatwin being not jealous and Silvia being not hypocritical.
If someone is not delightful or not hypocritical, then he is not grumpy.
Someone who is hypocritical is always both frightened and not delightful.
If someone is not hypocritical, then he is not jealous, and vice versa.
Someone being both not jealous and not delightful is equivalent to being hypocritical and bright.
If there is at least one people who is both not bright and jealous, then Quade is not frightened.
If there is someone who is not delightful, then Silvia is not jealous.
If Jorge is not delightful, then Kerry is not bright.
If there is at least one people who is not grumpy or not frightened, then Quade is not hypocritical.
Quade being not grumpy implies that Kerry is frightened and Jorge is delightful.
Chatwin being not frightened or Jorge being not hypocritical implies that Jorge is grumpy. | Quade is jealous. | self_contradiction |
Lester is not grumpy.
Lester is frightened.
Quade is jealous.
Quade is not frightened.
Lester is bright.
Neil is bright.
Kerry is not delightful.
Jorge is jealous.
Chatwin is grumpy.
Neil is grumpy.
Kerry is not jealous.
Silvia is not grumpy.If someone is frightened, then he is not grumpy, and vice versa.
Lester being grumpy is equivalent to Chatwin being not jealous and Silvia being not hypocritical.
If someone is not delightful or not hypocritical, then he is not grumpy.
Someone who is hypocritical is always both frightened and not delightful.
If someone is not hypocritical, then he is not jealous, and vice versa.
Someone being both not jealous and not delightful is equivalent to being hypocritical and bright.
If there is at least one people who is both not bright and jealous, then Quade is not frightened.
If there is someone who is not delightful, then Silvia is not jealous.
If Jorge is not delightful, then Kerry is not bright.
If there is at least one people who is not grumpy or not frightened, then Quade is not hypocritical.
Quade being not grumpy implies that Kerry is frightened and Jorge is delightful.
Chatwin being not frightened or Jorge being not hypocritical implies that Jorge is grumpy. | Neil is not grumpy. | contradiction |
Lester is not grumpy.
Lester is frightened.
Quade is jealous.
Quade is not frightened.
Lester is bright.
Neil is bright.
Kerry is not delightful.
Jorge is jealous.
Chatwin is grumpy.
Neil is grumpy.
Kerry is not jealous.
Silvia is not grumpy.If someone is frightened, then he is not grumpy, and vice versa.
Lester being grumpy is equivalent to Chatwin being not jealous and Silvia being not hypocritical.
If someone is not delightful or not hypocritical, then he is not grumpy.
Someone who is hypocritical is always both frightened and not delightful.
If someone is not hypocritical, then he is not jealous, and vice versa.
Someone being both not jealous and not delightful is equivalent to being hypocritical and bright.
If there is at least one people who is both not bright and jealous, then Quade is not frightened.
If there is someone who is not delightful, then Silvia is not jealous.
If Jorge is not delightful, then Kerry is not bright.
If there is at least one people who is not grumpy or not frightened, then Quade is not hypocritical.
Quade being not grumpy implies that Kerry is frightened and Jorge is delightful.
Chatwin being not frightened or Jorge being not hypocritical implies that Jorge is grumpy. | Lester is not frightened. | contradiction |
Lester is not grumpy.
Lester is frightened.
Quade is jealous.
Quade is not frightened.
Lester is bright.
Neil is bright.
Kerry is not delightful.
Jorge is jealous.
Chatwin is grumpy.
Neil is grumpy.
Kerry is not jealous.
Silvia is not grumpy.If someone is frightened, then he is not grumpy, and vice versa.
Lester being grumpy is equivalent to Chatwin being not jealous and Silvia being not hypocritical.
If someone is not delightful or not hypocritical, then he is not grumpy.
Someone who is hypocritical is always both frightened and not delightful.
If someone is not hypocritical, then he is not jealous, and vice versa.
Someone being both not jealous and not delightful is equivalent to being hypocritical and bright.
If there is at least one people who is both not bright and jealous, then Quade is not frightened.
If there is someone who is not delightful, then Silvia is not jealous.
If Jorge is not delightful, then Kerry is not bright.
If there is at least one people who is not grumpy or not frightened, then Quade is not hypocritical.
Quade being not grumpy implies that Kerry is frightened and Jorge is delightful.
Chatwin being not frightened or Jorge being not hypocritical implies that Jorge is grumpy. | Lester is jealous. | neutral |
Lester is not grumpy.
Lester is frightened.
Quade is jealous.
Quade is not frightened.
Lester is bright.
Neil is bright.
Kerry is not delightful.
Jorge is jealous.
Chatwin is grumpy.
Neil is grumpy.
Kerry is not jealous.
Silvia is not grumpy.If someone is frightened, then he is not grumpy, and vice versa.
Lester being grumpy is equivalent to Chatwin being not jealous and Silvia being not hypocritical.
If someone is not delightful or not hypocritical, then he is not grumpy.
Someone who is hypocritical is always both frightened and not delightful.
If someone is not hypocritical, then he is not jealous, and vice versa.
Someone being both not jealous and not delightful is equivalent to being hypocritical and bright.
If there is at least one people who is both not bright and jealous, then Quade is not frightened.
If there is someone who is not delightful, then Silvia is not jealous.
If Jorge is not delightful, then Kerry is not bright.
If there is at least one people who is not grumpy or not frightened, then Quade is not hypocritical.
Quade being not grumpy implies that Kerry is frightened and Jorge is delightful.
Chatwin being not frightened or Jorge being not hypocritical implies that Jorge is grumpy. | Kerry is frightened. | entailment |
Lester is not grumpy.
Lester is frightened.
Quade is jealous.
Quade is not frightened.
Lester is bright.
Neil is bright.
Kerry is not delightful.
Jorge is jealous.
Chatwin is grumpy.
Neil is grumpy.
Kerry is not jealous.
Silvia is not grumpy.If someone is frightened, then he is not grumpy, and vice versa.
Lester being grumpy is equivalent to Chatwin being not jealous and Silvia being not hypocritical.
If someone is not delightful or not hypocritical, then he is not grumpy.
Someone who is hypocritical is always both frightened and not delightful.
If someone is not hypocritical, then he is not jealous, and vice versa.
Someone being both not jealous and not delightful is equivalent to being hypocritical and bright.
If there is at least one people who is both not bright and jealous, then Quade is not frightened.
If there is someone who is not delightful, then Silvia is not jealous.
If Jorge is not delightful, then Kerry is not bright.
If there is at least one people who is not grumpy or not frightened, then Quade is not hypocritical.
Quade being not grumpy implies that Kerry is frightened and Jorge is delightful.
Chatwin being not frightened or Jorge being not hypocritical implies that Jorge is grumpy. | Silvia is hypocritical. | contradiction |
Bruno is not unable.
Marlon is not unable.
Kelvin is unable.
Ashley is teeny.
Marlon is teeny.
Bruno is not motionless.
Aldis is teeny.
Ashley is brave.
Marlon is motionless.
Bruno is teeny.
Kelvin is not repulsive.
Marlon is not brave.Someone being motionless is equivalent to being not brave.
Someone who is eithor unable or motionless is always not troubled.
It can be concluded that Traci is brave and Ashley is not motionless once knowing that Aldis is not unable.
As long as someone is not motionless, he is not repulsive and not teeny.
Someone being both not motionless and troubled is equivalent to being not unable and not brave.
If Ashley is not teeny, then Aldis is not unable and Ashley is not troubled.
If there is at least one people who is motionless or not repulsive, then Ashley is teeny.
If there is someone who is brave, then Aldis is teeny and Marlon is motionless.
If Isabel is repulsive and Marlon is motionless, then Ashley is troubled and Ashley is teeny.
If someone is unable or he is troubled, then he is not brave.
If Kelvin is brave and Traci is unable, then Marlon is not troubled.
It can be concluded that Isabel is motionless once knowing that Isabel is troubled. | Traci is teeny. | neutral |
Bruno is not unable.
Marlon is not unable.
Kelvin is unable.
Ashley is teeny.
Marlon is teeny.
Bruno is not motionless.
Aldis is teeny.
Ashley is brave.
Marlon is motionless.
Bruno is teeny.
Kelvin is not repulsive.
Marlon is not brave.Someone being motionless is equivalent to being not brave.
Someone who is eithor unable or motionless is always not troubled.
It can be concluded that Traci is brave and Ashley is not motionless once knowing that Aldis is not unable.
As long as someone is not motionless, he is not repulsive and not teeny.
Someone being both not motionless and troubled is equivalent to being not unable and not brave.
If Ashley is not teeny, then Aldis is not unable and Ashley is not troubled.
If there is at least one people who is motionless or not repulsive, then Ashley is teeny.
If there is someone who is brave, then Aldis is teeny and Marlon is motionless.
If Isabel is repulsive and Marlon is motionless, then Ashley is troubled and Ashley is teeny.
If someone is unable or he is troubled, then he is not brave.
If Kelvin is brave and Traci is unable, then Marlon is not troubled.
It can be concluded that Isabel is motionless once knowing that Isabel is troubled. | Kelvin is not troubled. | entailment |
Bruno is not unable.
Marlon is not unable.
Kelvin is unable.
Ashley is teeny.
Marlon is teeny.
Bruno is not motionless.
Aldis is teeny.
Ashley is brave.
Marlon is motionless.
Bruno is teeny.
Kelvin is not repulsive.
Marlon is not brave.Someone being motionless is equivalent to being not brave.
Someone who is eithor unable or motionless is always not troubled.
It can be concluded that Traci is brave and Ashley is not motionless once knowing that Aldis is not unable.
As long as someone is not motionless, he is not repulsive and not teeny.
Someone being both not motionless and troubled is equivalent to being not unable and not brave.
If Ashley is not teeny, then Aldis is not unable and Ashley is not troubled.
If there is at least one people who is motionless or not repulsive, then Ashley is teeny.
If there is someone who is brave, then Aldis is teeny and Marlon is motionless.
If Isabel is repulsive and Marlon is motionless, then Ashley is troubled and Ashley is teeny.
If someone is unable or he is troubled, then he is not brave.
If Kelvin is brave and Traci is unable, then Marlon is not troubled.
It can be concluded that Isabel is motionless once knowing that Isabel is troubled. | Marlon is brave. | contradiction |
Bruno is not unable.
Marlon is not unable.
Kelvin is unable.
Ashley is teeny.
Marlon is teeny.
Bruno is not motionless.
Aldis is teeny.
Ashley is brave.
Marlon is motionless.
Bruno is teeny.
Kelvin is not repulsive.
Marlon is not brave.Someone being motionless is equivalent to being not brave.
Someone who is eithor unable or motionless is always not troubled.
It can be concluded that Traci is brave and Ashley is not motionless once knowing that Aldis is not unable.
As long as someone is not motionless, he is not repulsive and not teeny.
Someone being both not motionless and troubled is equivalent to being not unable and not brave.
If Ashley is not teeny, then Aldis is not unable and Ashley is not troubled.
If there is at least one people who is motionless or not repulsive, then Ashley is teeny.
If there is someone who is brave, then Aldis is teeny and Marlon is motionless.
If Isabel is repulsive and Marlon is motionless, then Ashley is troubled and Ashley is teeny.
If someone is unable or he is troubled, then he is not brave.
If Kelvin is brave and Traci is unable, then Marlon is not troubled.
It can be concluded that Isabel is motionless once knowing that Isabel is troubled. | Isabel is motionless. | neutral |
Bruno is not unable.
Marlon is not unable.
Kelvin is unable.
Ashley is teeny.
Marlon is teeny.
Bruno is not motionless.
Aldis is teeny.
Ashley is brave.
Marlon is motionless.
Bruno is teeny.
Kelvin is not repulsive.
Marlon is not brave.Someone being motionless is equivalent to being not brave.
Someone who is eithor unable or motionless is always not troubled.
It can be concluded that Traci is brave and Ashley is not motionless once knowing that Aldis is not unable.
As long as someone is not motionless, he is not repulsive and not teeny.
Someone being both not motionless and troubled is equivalent to being not unable and not brave.
If Ashley is not teeny, then Aldis is not unable and Ashley is not troubled.
If there is at least one people who is motionless or not repulsive, then Ashley is teeny.
If there is someone who is brave, then Aldis is teeny and Marlon is motionless.
If Isabel is repulsive and Marlon is motionless, then Ashley is troubled and Ashley is teeny.
If someone is unable or he is troubled, then he is not brave.
If Kelvin is brave and Traci is unable, then Marlon is not troubled.
It can be concluded that Isabel is motionless once knowing that Isabel is troubled. | Marlon is unable. | contradiction |
Bruno is not unable.
Marlon is not unable.
Kelvin is unable.
Ashley is teeny.
Marlon is teeny.
Bruno is not motionless.
Aldis is teeny.
Ashley is brave.
Marlon is motionless.
Bruno is teeny.
Kelvin is not repulsive.
Marlon is not brave.Someone being motionless is equivalent to being not brave.
Someone who is eithor unable or motionless is always not troubled.
It can be concluded that Traci is brave and Ashley is not motionless once knowing that Aldis is not unable.
As long as someone is not motionless, he is not repulsive and not teeny.
Someone being both not motionless and troubled is equivalent to being not unable and not brave.
If Ashley is not teeny, then Aldis is not unable and Ashley is not troubled.
If there is at least one people who is motionless or not repulsive, then Ashley is teeny.
If there is someone who is brave, then Aldis is teeny and Marlon is motionless.
If Isabel is repulsive and Marlon is motionless, then Ashley is troubled and Ashley is teeny.
If someone is unable or he is troubled, then he is not brave.
If Kelvin is brave and Traci is unable, then Marlon is not troubled.
It can be concluded that Isabel is motionless once knowing that Isabel is troubled. | Traci is not unable. | neutral |
Bruno is not unable.
Marlon is not unable.
Kelvin is unable.
Ashley is teeny.
Marlon is teeny.
Bruno is not motionless.
Aldis is teeny.
Ashley is brave.
Marlon is motionless.
Bruno is teeny.
Kelvin is not repulsive.
Marlon is not brave.Someone being motionless is equivalent to being not brave.
Someone who is eithor unable or motionless is always not troubled.
It can be concluded that Traci is brave and Ashley is not motionless once knowing that Aldis is not unable.
As long as someone is not motionless, he is not repulsive and not teeny.
Someone being both not motionless and troubled is equivalent to being not unable and not brave.
If Ashley is not teeny, then Aldis is not unable and Ashley is not troubled.
If there is at least one people who is motionless or not repulsive, then Ashley is teeny.
If there is someone who is brave, then Aldis is teeny and Marlon is motionless.
If Isabel is repulsive and Marlon is motionless, then Ashley is troubled and Ashley is teeny.
If someone is unable or he is troubled, then he is not brave.
If Kelvin is brave and Traci is unable, then Marlon is not troubled.
It can be concluded that Isabel is motionless once knowing that Isabel is troubled. | Marlon is not teeny. | self_contradiction |
Bruno is not unable.
Marlon is not unable.
Kelvin is unable.
Ashley is teeny.
Marlon is teeny.
Bruno is not motionless.
Aldis is teeny.
Ashley is brave.
Marlon is motionless.
Bruno is teeny.
Kelvin is not repulsive.
Marlon is not brave.Someone being motionless is equivalent to being not brave.
Someone who is eithor unable or motionless is always not troubled.
It can be concluded that Traci is brave and Ashley is not motionless once knowing that Aldis is not unable.
As long as someone is not motionless, he is not repulsive and not teeny.
Someone being both not motionless and troubled is equivalent to being not unable and not brave.
If Ashley is not teeny, then Aldis is not unable and Ashley is not troubled.
If there is at least one people who is motionless or not repulsive, then Ashley is teeny.
If there is someone who is brave, then Aldis is teeny and Marlon is motionless.
If Isabel is repulsive and Marlon is motionless, then Ashley is troubled and Ashley is teeny.
If someone is unable or he is troubled, then he is not brave.
If Kelvin is brave and Traci is unable, then Marlon is not troubled.
It can be concluded that Isabel is motionless once knowing that Isabel is troubled. | Bruno is not repulsive. | entailment |
Bruno is not unable.
Marlon is not unable.
Kelvin is unable.
Ashley is teeny.
Marlon is teeny.
Bruno is not motionless.
Aldis is teeny.
Ashley is brave.
Marlon is motionless.
Bruno is teeny.
Kelvin is not repulsive.
Marlon is not brave.Someone being motionless is equivalent to being not brave.
Someone who is eithor unable or motionless is always not troubled.
It can be concluded that Traci is brave and Ashley is not motionless once knowing that Aldis is not unable.
As long as someone is not motionless, he is not repulsive and not teeny.
Someone being both not motionless and troubled is equivalent to being not unable and not brave.
If Ashley is not teeny, then Aldis is not unable and Ashley is not troubled.
If there is at least one people who is motionless or not repulsive, then Ashley is teeny.
If there is someone who is brave, then Aldis is teeny and Marlon is motionless.
If Isabel is repulsive and Marlon is motionless, then Ashley is troubled and Ashley is teeny.
If someone is unable or he is troubled, then he is not brave.
If Kelvin is brave and Traci is unable, then Marlon is not troubled.
It can be concluded that Isabel is motionless once knowing that Isabel is troubled. | Kelvin is not brave. | entailment |
Bruno is not unable.
Marlon is not unable.
Kelvin is unable.
Ashley is teeny.
Marlon is teeny.
Bruno is not motionless.
Aldis is teeny.
Ashley is brave.
Marlon is motionless.
Bruno is teeny.
Kelvin is not repulsive.
Marlon is not brave.Someone being motionless is equivalent to being not brave.
Someone who is eithor unable or motionless is always not troubled.
It can be concluded that Traci is brave and Ashley is not motionless once knowing that Aldis is not unable.
As long as someone is not motionless, he is not repulsive and not teeny.
Someone being both not motionless and troubled is equivalent to being not unable and not brave.
If Ashley is not teeny, then Aldis is not unable and Ashley is not troubled.
If there is at least one people who is motionless or not repulsive, then Ashley is teeny.
If there is someone who is brave, then Aldis is teeny and Marlon is motionless.
If Isabel is repulsive and Marlon is motionless, then Ashley is troubled and Ashley is teeny.
If someone is unable or he is troubled, then he is not brave.
If Kelvin is brave and Traci is unable, then Marlon is not troubled.
It can be concluded that Isabel is motionless once knowing that Isabel is troubled. | Kelvin is troubled. | contradiction |
Bruno is not unable.
Marlon is not unable.
Kelvin is unable.
Ashley is teeny.
Marlon is teeny.
Bruno is not motionless.
Aldis is teeny.
Ashley is brave.
Marlon is motionless.
Bruno is teeny.
Kelvin is not repulsive.
Marlon is not brave.Someone being motionless is equivalent to being not brave.
Someone who is eithor unable or motionless is always not troubled.
It can be concluded that Traci is brave and Ashley is not motionless once knowing that Aldis is not unable.
As long as someone is not motionless, he is not repulsive and not teeny.
Someone being both not motionless and troubled is equivalent to being not unable and not brave.
If Ashley is not teeny, then Aldis is not unable and Ashley is not troubled.
If there is at least one people who is motionless or not repulsive, then Ashley is teeny.
If there is someone who is brave, then Aldis is teeny and Marlon is motionless.
If Isabel is repulsive and Marlon is motionless, then Ashley is troubled and Ashley is teeny.
If someone is unable or he is troubled, then he is not brave.
If Kelvin is brave and Traci is unable, then Marlon is not troubled.
It can be concluded that Isabel is motionless once knowing that Isabel is troubled. | Marlon is not repulsive. | entailment |
Bruno is not unable.
Marlon is not unable.
Kelvin is unable.
Ashley is teeny.
Marlon is teeny.
Bruno is not motionless.
Aldis is teeny.
Ashley is brave.
Marlon is motionless.
Bruno is teeny.
Kelvin is not repulsive.
Marlon is not brave.Someone being motionless is equivalent to being not brave.
Someone who is eithor unable or motionless is always not troubled.
It can be concluded that Traci is brave and Ashley is not motionless once knowing that Aldis is not unable.
As long as someone is not motionless, he is not repulsive and not teeny.
Someone being both not motionless and troubled is equivalent to being not unable and not brave.
If Ashley is not teeny, then Aldis is not unable and Ashley is not troubled.
If there is at least one people who is motionless or not repulsive, then Ashley is teeny.
If there is someone who is brave, then Aldis is teeny and Marlon is motionless.
If Isabel is repulsive and Marlon is motionless, then Ashley is troubled and Ashley is teeny.
If someone is unable or he is troubled, then he is not brave.
If Kelvin is brave and Traci is unable, then Marlon is not troubled.
It can be concluded that Isabel is motionless once knowing that Isabel is troubled. | Kelvin is repulsive. | contradiction |
Bruno is not unable.
Marlon is not unable.
Kelvin is unable.
Ashley is teeny.
Marlon is teeny.
Bruno is not motionless.
Aldis is teeny.
Ashley is brave.
Marlon is motionless.
Bruno is teeny.
Kelvin is not repulsive.
Marlon is not brave.Someone being motionless is equivalent to being not brave.
Someone who is eithor unable or motionless is always not troubled.
It can be concluded that Traci is brave and Ashley is not motionless once knowing that Aldis is not unable.
As long as someone is not motionless, he is not repulsive and not teeny.
Someone being both not motionless and troubled is equivalent to being not unable and not brave.
If Ashley is not teeny, then Aldis is not unable and Ashley is not troubled.
If there is at least one people who is motionless or not repulsive, then Ashley is teeny.
If there is someone who is brave, then Aldis is teeny and Marlon is motionless.
If Isabel is repulsive and Marlon is motionless, then Ashley is troubled and Ashley is teeny.
If someone is unable or he is troubled, then he is not brave.
If Kelvin is brave and Traci is unable, then Marlon is not troubled.
It can be concluded that Isabel is motionless once knowing that Isabel is troubled. | Bruno is not motionless. | entailment |
Bruno is not unable.
Marlon is not unable.
Kelvin is unable.
Ashley is teeny.
Marlon is teeny.
Bruno is not motionless.
Aldis is teeny.
Ashley is brave.
Marlon is motionless.
Bruno is teeny.
Kelvin is not repulsive.
Marlon is not brave.Someone being motionless is equivalent to being not brave.
Someone who is eithor unable or motionless is always not troubled.
It can be concluded that Traci is brave and Ashley is not motionless once knowing that Aldis is not unable.
As long as someone is not motionless, he is not repulsive and not teeny.
Someone being both not motionless and troubled is equivalent to being not unable and not brave.
If Ashley is not teeny, then Aldis is not unable and Ashley is not troubled.
If there is at least one people who is motionless or not repulsive, then Ashley is teeny.
If there is someone who is brave, then Aldis is teeny and Marlon is motionless.
If Isabel is repulsive and Marlon is motionless, then Ashley is troubled and Ashley is teeny.
If someone is unable or he is troubled, then he is not brave.
If Kelvin is brave and Traci is unable, then Marlon is not troubled.
It can be concluded that Isabel is motionless once knowing that Isabel is troubled. | Traci is brave. | neutral |
Bruno is not unable.
Marlon is not unable.
Kelvin is unable.
Ashley is teeny.
Marlon is teeny.
Bruno is not motionless.
Aldis is teeny.
Ashley is brave.
Marlon is motionless.
Bruno is teeny.
Kelvin is not repulsive.
Marlon is not brave.Someone being motionless is equivalent to being not brave.
Someone who is eithor unable or motionless is always not troubled.
It can be concluded that Traci is brave and Ashley is not motionless once knowing that Aldis is not unable.
As long as someone is not motionless, he is not repulsive and not teeny.
Someone being both not motionless and troubled is equivalent to being not unable and not brave.
If Ashley is not teeny, then Aldis is not unable and Ashley is not troubled.
If there is at least one people who is motionless or not repulsive, then Ashley is teeny.
If there is someone who is brave, then Aldis is teeny and Marlon is motionless.
If Isabel is repulsive and Marlon is motionless, then Ashley is troubled and Ashley is teeny.
If someone is unable or he is troubled, then he is not brave.
If Kelvin is brave and Traci is unable, then Marlon is not troubled.
It can be concluded that Isabel is motionless once knowing that Isabel is troubled. | Marlon is troubled. | self_contradiction |
Bruno is not unable.
Marlon is not unable.
Kelvin is unable.
Ashley is teeny.
Marlon is teeny.
Bruno is not motionless.
Aldis is teeny.
Ashley is brave.
Marlon is motionless.
Bruno is teeny.
Kelvin is not repulsive.
Marlon is not brave.Someone being motionless is equivalent to being not brave.
Someone who is eithor unable or motionless is always not troubled.
It can be concluded that Traci is brave and Ashley is not motionless once knowing that Aldis is not unable.
As long as someone is not motionless, he is not repulsive and not teeny.
Someone being both not motionless and troubled is equivalent to being not unable and not brave.
If Ashley is not teeny, then Aldis is not unable and Ashley is not troubled.
If there is at least one people who is motionless or not repulsive, then Ashley is teeny.
If there is someone who is brave, then Aldis is teeny and Marlon is motionless.
If Isabel is repulsive and Marlon is motionless, then Ashley is troubled and Ashley is teeny.
If someone is unable or he is troubled, then he is not brave.
If Kelvin is brave and Traci is unable, then Marlon is not troubled.
It can be concluded that Isabel is motionless once knowing that Isabel is troubled. | Ashley is not motionless. | neutral |
Bruno is not unable.
Marlon is not unable.
Kelvin is unable.
Ashley is teeny.
Marlon is teeny.
Bruno is not motionless.
Aldis is teeny.
Ashley is brave.
Marlon is motionless.
Bruno is teeny.
Kelvin is not repulsive.
Marlon is not brave.Someone being motionless is equivalent to being not brave.
Someone who is eithor unable or motionless is always not troubled.
It can be concluded that Traci is brave and Ashley is not motionless once knowing that Aldis is not unable.
As long as someone is not motionless, he is not repulsive and not teeny.
Someone being both not motionless and troubled is equivalent to being not unable and not brave.
If Ashley is not teeny, then Aldis is not unable and Ashley is not troubled.
If there is at least one people who is motionless or not repulsive, then Ashley is teeny.
If there is someone who is brave, then Aldis is teeny and Marlon is motionless.
If Isabel is repulsive and Marlon is motionless, then Ashley is troubled and Ashley is teeny.
If someone is unable or he is troubled, then he is not brave.
If Kelvin is brave and Traci is unable, then Marlon is not troubled.
It can be concluded that Isabel is motionless once knowing that Isabel is troubled. | Marlon is teeny. | self_contradiction |
Bruno is not unable.
Marlon is not unable.
Kelvin is unable.
Ashley is teeny.
Marlon is teeny.
Bruno is not motionless.
Aldis is teeny.
Ashley is brave.
Marlon is motionless.
Bruno is teeny.
Kelvin is not repulsive.
Marlon is not brave.Someone being motionless is equivalent to being not brave.
Someone who is eithor unable or motionless is always not troubled.
It can be concluded that Traci is brave and Ashley is not motionless once knowing that Aldis is not unable.
As long as someone is not motionless, he is not repulsive and not teeny.
Someone being both not motionless and troubled is equivalent to being not unable and not brave.
If Ashley is not teeny, then Aldis is not unable and Ashley is not troubled.
If there is at least one people who is motionless or not repulsive, then Ashley is teeny.
If there is someone who is brave, then Aldis is teeny and Marlon is motionless.
If Isabel is repulsive and Marlon is motionless, then Ashley is troubled and Ashley is teeny.
If someone is unable or he is troubled, then he is not brave.
If Kelvin is brave and Traci is unable, then Marlon is not troubled.
It can be concluded that Isabel is motionless once knowing that Isabel is troubled. | Marlon is not troubled. | self_contradiction |
Bruno is not unable.
Marlon is not unable.
Kelvin is unable.
Ashley is teeny.
Marlon is teeny.
Bruno is not motionless.
Aldis is teeny.
Ashley is brave.
Marlon is motionless.
Bruno is teeny.
Kelvin is not repulsive.
Marlon is not brave.Someone being motionless is equivalent to being not brave.
Someone who is eithor unable or motionless is always not troubled.
It can be concluded that Traci is brave and Ashley is not motionless once knowing that Aldis is not unable.
As long as someone is not motionless, he is not repulsive and not teeny.
Someone being both not motionless and troubled is equivalent to being not unable and not brave.
If Ashley is not teeny, then Aldis is not unable and Ashley is not troubled.
If there is at least one people who is motionless or not repulsive, then Ashley is teeny.
If there is someone who is brave, then Aldis is teeny and Marlon is motionless.
If Isabel is repulsive and Marlon is motionless, then Ashley is troubled and Ashley is teeny.
If someone is unable or he is troubled, then he is not brave.
If Kelvin is brave and Traci is unable, then Marlon is not troubled.
It can be concluded that Isabel is motionless once knowing that Isabel is troubled. | Marlon is not motionless. | self_contradiction |
Bruno is not unable.
Marlon is not unable.
Kelvin is unable.
Ashley is teeny.
Marlon is teeny.
Bruno is not motionless.
Aldis is teeny.
Ashley is brave.
Marlon is motionless.
Bruno is teeny.
Kelvin is not repulsive.
Marlon is not brave.Someone being motionless is equivalent to being not brave.
Someone who is eithor unable or motionless is always not troubled.
It can be concluded that Traci is brave and Ashley is not motionless once knowing that Aldis is not unable.
As long as someone is not motionless, he is not repulsive and not teeny.
Someone being both not motionless and troubled is equivalent to being not unable and not brave.
If Ashley is not teeny, then Aldis is not unable and Ashley is not troubled.
If there is at least one people who is motionless or not repulsive, then Ashley is teeny.
If there is someone who is brave, then Aldis is teeny and Marlon is motionless.
If Isabel is repulsive and Marlon is motionless, then Ashley is troubled and Ashley is teeny.
If someone is unable or he is troubled, then he is not brave.
If Kelvin is brave and Traci is unable, then Marlon is not troubled.
It can be concluded that Isabel is motionless once knowing that Isabel is troubled. | Ashley is not brave. | contradiction |
Conan is unfair.
Conan is helpful.
Tyler is not horrible.
Jeremiah is not helpful.
Sherman is unfair.
Kent is sad.
Conan is not outstanding.
Caleb is helpful.
Tyler is not unfair.
Tyler is not sad.
Sherman is not outstanding.
Tyler is not easy.Someone who is horrible is always unfair.
Someone is easy and not outstanding if and only if he is not unfair and horrible.
If Kent is horrible and Conan is not unfair, then Tyler is not helpful.
Caleb being not sad implies that Jeremiah is horrible and Caleb is helpful.
It can be concluded that Sherman is not horrible and Sherman is outstanding once knowing that Caleb is helpful and Tyler is not unfair.
If there is someone who is easy, then Conan is outstanding.
If everyone is sad or not outstanding, then Caleb is unfair.
If there is someone who is unfair, then Tyler is helpful and Jeremiah is easy.
It can be concluded that Tyler is not unfair once knowing that Ron is outstanding.
Someone is not sad and outstanding if and only if he is not horrible and not helpful.
If someone is unfair, then he is not helpful, and vice versa.
If Ron is sad, then Jeremiah is not easy and Sherman is outstanding. | Sherman is outstanding. | self_contradiction |
Conan is unfair.
Conan is helpful.
Tyler is not horrible.
Jeremiah is not helpful.
Sherman is unfair.
Kent is sad.
Conan is not outstanding.
Caleb is helpful.
Tyler is not unfair.
Tyler is not sad.
Sherman is not outstanding.
Tyler is not easy.Someone who is horrible is always unfair.
Someone is easy and not outstanding if and only if he is not unfair and horrible.
If Kent is horrible and Conan is not unfair, then Tyler is not helpful.
Caleb being not sad implies that Jeremiah is horrible and Caleb is helpful.
It can be concluded that Sherman is not horrible and Sherman is outstanding once knowing that Caleb is helpful and Tyler is not unfair.
If there is someone who is easy, then Conan is outstanding.
If everyone is sad or not outstanding, then Caleb is unfair.
If there is someone who is unfair, then Tyler is helpful and Jeremiah is easy.
It can be concluded that Tyler is not unfair once knowing that Ron is outstanding.
Someone is not sad and outstanding if and only if he is not horrible and not helpful.
If someone is unfair, then he is not helpful, and vice versa.
If Ron is sad, then Jeremiah is not easy and Sherman is outstanding. | Sherman is easy. | neutral |
Conan is unfair.
Conan is helpful.
Tyler is not horrible.
Jeremiah is not helpful.
Sherman is unfair.
Kent is sad.
Conan is not outstanding.
Caleb is helpful.
Tyler is not unfair.
Tyler is not sad.
Sherman is not outstanding.
Tyler is not easy.Someone who is horrible is always unfair.
Someone is easy and not outstanding if and only if he is not unfair and horrible.
If Kent is horrible and Conan is not unfair, then Tyler is not helpful.
Caleb being not sad implies that Jeremiah is horrible and Caleb is helpful.
It can be concluded that Sherman is not horrible and Sherman is outstanding once knowing that Caleb is helpful and Tyler is not unfair.
If there is someone who is easy, then Conan is outstanding.
If everyone is sad or not outstanding, then Caleb is unfair.
If there is someone who is unfair, then Tyler is helpful and Jeremiah is easy.
It can be concluded that Tyler is not unfair once knowing that Ron is outstanding.
Someone is not sad and outstanding if and only if he is not horrible and not helpful.
If someone is unfair, then he is not helpful, and vice versa.
If Ron is sad, then Jeremiah is not easy and Sherman is outstanding. | Jeremiah is sad. | neutral |
Conan is unfair.
Conan is helpful.
Tyler is not horrible.
Jeremiah is not helpful.
Sherman is unfair.
Kent is sad.
Conan is not outstanding.
Caleb is helpful.
Tyler is not unfair.
Tyler is not sad.
Sherman is not outstanding.
Tyler is not easy.Someone who is horrible is always unfair.
Someone is easy and not outstanding if and only if he is not unfair and horrible.
If Kent is horrible and Conan is not unfair, then Tyler is not helpful.
Caleb being not sad implies that Jeremiah is horrible and Caleb is helpful.
It can be concluded that Sherman is not horrible and Sherman is outstanding once knowing that Caleb is helpful and Tyler is not unfair.
If there is someone who is easy, then Conan is outstanding.
If everyone is sad or not outstanding, then Caleb is unfair.
If there is someone who is unfair, then Tyler is helpful and Jeremiah is easy.
It can be concluded that Tyler is not unfair once knowing that Ron is outstanding.
Someone is not sad and outstanding if and only if he is not horrible and not helpful.
If someone is unfair, then he is not helpful, and vice versa.
If Ron is sad, then Jeremiah is not easy and Sherman is outstanding. | Jeremiah is not easy. | contradiction |
Conan is unfair.
Conan is helpful.
Tyler is not horrible.
Jeremiah is not helpful.
Sherman is unfair.
Kent is sad.
Conan is not outstanding.
Caleb is helpful.
Tyler is not unfair.
Tyler is not sad.
Sherman is not outstanding.
Tyler is not easy.Someone who is horrible is always unfair.
Someone is easy and not outstanding if and only if he is not unfair and horrible.
If Kent is horrible and Conan is not unfair, then Tyler is not helpful.
Caleb being not sad implies that Jeremiah is horrible and Caleb is helpful.
It can be concluded that Sherman is not horrible and Sherman is outstanding once knowing that Caleb is helpful and Tyler is not unfair.
If there is someone who is easy, then Conan is outstanding.
If everyone is sad or not outstanding, then Caleb is unfair.
If there is someone who is unfair, then Tyler is helpful and Jeremiah is easy.
It can be concluded that Tyler is not unfair once knowing that Ron is outstanding.
Someone is not sad and outstanding if and only if he is not horrible and not helpful.
If someone is unfair, then he is not helpful, and vice versa.
If Ron is sad, then Jeremiah is not easy and Sherman is outstanding. | Ron is not helpful. | neutral |
Conan is unfair.
Conan is helpful.
Tyler is not horrible.
Jeremiah is not helpful.
Sherman is unfair.
Kent is sad.
Conan is not outstanding.
Caleb is helpful.
Tyler is not unfair.
Tyler is not sad.
Sherman is not outstanding.
Tyler is not easy.Someone who is horrible is always unfair.
Someone is easy and not outstanding if and only if he is not unfair and horrible.
If Kent is horrible and Conan is not unfair, then Tyler is not helpful.
Caleb being not sad implies that Jeremiah is horrible and Caleb is helpful.
It can be concluded that Sherman is not horrible and Sherman is outstanding once knowing that Caleb is helpful and Tyler is not unfair.
If there is someone who is easy, then Conan is outstanding.
If everyone is sad or not outstanding, then Caleb is unfair.
If there is someone who is unfair, then Tyler is helpful and Jeremiah is easy.
It can be concluded that Tyler is not unfair once knowing that Ron is outstanding.
Someone is not sad and outstanding if and only if he is not horrible and not helpful.
If someone is unfair, then he is not helpful, and vice versa.
If Ron is sad, then Jeremiah is not easy and Sherman is outstanding. | Tyler is not easy. | entailment |
Conan is unfair.
Conan is helpful.
Tyler is not horrible.
Jeremiah is not helpful.
Sherman is unfair.
Kent is sad.
Conan is not outstanding.
Caleb is helpful.
Tyler is not unfair.
Tyler is not sad.
Sherman is not outstanding.
Tyler is not easy.Someone who is horrible is always unfair.
Someone is easy and not outstanding if and only if he is not unfair and horrible.
If Kent is horrible and Conan is not unfair, then Tyler is not helpful.
Caleb being not sad implies that Jeremiah is horrible and Caleb is helpful.
It can be concluded that Sherman is not horrible and Sherman is outstanding once knowing that Caleb is helpful and Tyler is not unfair.
If there is someone who is easy, then Conan is outstanding.
If everyone is sad or not outstanding, then Caleb is unfair.
If there is someone who is unfair, then Tyler is helpful and Jeremiah is easy.
It can be concluded that Tyler is not unfair once knowing that Ron is outstanding.
Someone is not sad and outstanding if and only if he is not horrible and not helpful.
If someone is unfair, then he is not helpful, and vice versa.
If Ron is sad, then Jeremiah is not easy and Sherman is outstanding. | Tyler is helpful. | entailment |
Conan is unfair.
Conan is helpful.
Tyler is not horrible.
Jeremiah is not helpful.
Sherman is unfair.
Kent is sad.
Conan is not outstanding.
Caleb is helpful.
Tyler is not unfair.
Tyler is not sad.
Sherman is not outstanding.
Tyler is not easy.Someone who is horrible is always unfair.
Someone is easy and not outstanding if and only if he is not unfair and horrible.
If Kent is horrible and Conan is not unfair, then Tyler is not helpful.
Caleb being not sad implies that Jeremiah is horrible and Caleb is helpful.
It can be concluded that Sherman is not horrible and Sherman is outstanding once knowing that Caleb is helpful and Tyler is not unfair.
If there is someone who is easy, then Conan is outstanding.
If everyone is sad or not outstanding, then Caleb is unfair.
If there is someone who is unfair, then Tyler is helpful and Jeremiah is easy.
It can be concluded that Tyler is not unfair once knowing that Ron is outstanding.
Someone is not sad and outstanding if and only if he is not horrible and not helpful.
If someone is unfair, then he is not helpful, and vice versa.
If Ron is sad, then Jeremiah is not easy and Sherman is outstanding. | Jeremiah is outstanding. | neutral |
Conan is unfair.
Conan is helpful.
Tyler is not horrible.
Jeremiah is not helpful.
Sherman is unfair.
Kent is sad.
Conan is not outstanding.
Caleb is helpful.
Tyler is not unfair.
Tyler is not sad.
Sherman is not outstanding.
Tyler is not easy.Someone who is horrible is always unfair.
Someone is easy and not outstanding if and only if he is not unfair and horrible.
If Kent is horrible and Conan is not unfair, then Tyler is not helpful.
Caleb being not sad implies that Jeremiah is horrible and Caleb is helpful.
It can be concluded that Sherman is not horrible and Sherman is outstanding once knowing that Caleb is helpful and Tyler is not unfair.
If there is someone who is easy, then Conan is outstanding.
If everyone is sad or not outstanding, then Caleb is unfair.
If there is someone who is unfair, then Tyler is helpful and Jeremiah is easy.
It can be concluded that Tyler is not unfair once knowing that Ron is outstanding.
Someone is not sad and outstanding if and only if he is not horrible and not helpful.
If someone is unfair, then he is not helpful, and vice versa.
If Ron is sad, then Jeremiah is not easy and Sherman is outstanding. | Conan is not outstanding. | self_contradiction |
Conan is unfair.
Conan is helpful.
Tyler is not horrible.
Jeremiah is not helpful.
Sherman is unfair.
Kent is sad.
Conan is not outstanding.
Caleb is helpful.
Tyler is not unfair.
Tyler is not sad.
Sherman is not outstanding.
Tyler is not easy.Someone who is horrible is always unfair.
Someone is easy and not outstanding if and only if he is not unfair and horrible.
If Kent is horrible and Conan is not unfair, then Tyler is not helpful.
Caleb being not sad implies that Jeremiah is horrible and Caleb is helpful.
It can be concluded that Sherman is not horrible and Sherman is outstanding once knowing that Caleb is helpful and Tyler is not unfair.
If there is someone who is easy, then Conan is outstanding.
If everyone is sad or not outstanding, then Caleb is unfair.
If there is someone who is unfair, then Tyler is helpful and Jeremiah is easy.
It can be concluded that Tyler is not unfair once knowing that Ron is outstanding.
Someone is not sad and outstanding if and only if he is not horrible and not helpful.
If someone is unfair, then he is not helpful, and vice versa.
If Ron is sad, then Jeremiah is not easy and Sherman is outstanding. | Sherman is sad. | contradiction |
Conan is unfair.
Conan is helpful.
Tyler is not horrible.
Jeremiah is not helpful.
Sherman is unfair.
Kent is sad.
Conan is not outstanding.
Caleb is helpful.
Tyler is not unfair.
Tyler is not sad.
Sherman is not outstanding.
Tyler is not easy.Someone who is horrible is always unfair.
Someone is easy and not outstanding if and only if he is not unfair and horrible.
If Kent is horrible and Conan is not unfair, then Tyler is not helpful.
Caleb being not sad implies that Jeremiah is horrible and Caleb is helpful.
It can be concluded that Sherman is not horrible and Sherman is outstanding once knowing that Caleb is helpful and Tyler is not unfair.
If there is someone who is easy, then Conan is outstanding.
If everyone is sad or not outstanding, then Caleb is unfair.
If there is someone who is unfair, then Tyler is helpful and Jeremiah is easy.
It can be concluded that Tyler is not unfair once knowing that Ron is outstanding.
Someone is not sad and outstanding if and only if he is not horrible and not helpful.
If someone is unfair, then he is not helpful, and vice versa.
If Ron is sad, then Jeremiah is not easy and Sherman is outstanding. | Conan is easy. | neutral |
Conan is unfair.
Conan is helpful.
Tyler is not horrible.
Jeremiah is not helpful.
Sherman is unfair.
Kent is sad.
Conan is not outstanding.
Caleb is helpful.
Tyler is not unfair.
Tyler is not sad.
Sherman is not outstanding.
Tyler is not easy.Someone who is horrible is always unfair.
Someone is easy and not outstanding if and only if he is not unfair and horrible.
If Kent is horrible and Conan is not unfair, then Tyler is not helpful.
Caleb being not sad implies that Jeremiah is horrible and Caleb is helpful.
It can be concluded that Sherman is not horrible and Sherman is outstanding once knowing that Caleb is helpful and Tyler is not unfair.
If there is someone who is easy, then Conan is outstanding.
If everyone is sad or not outstanding, then Caleb is unfair.
If there is someone who is unfair, then Tyler is helpful and Jeremiah is easy.
It can be concluded that Tyler is not unfair once knowing that Ron is outstanding.
Someone is not sad and outstanding if and only if he is not horrible and not helpful.
If someone is unfair, then he is not helpful, and vice versa.
If Ron is sad, then Jeremiah is not easy and Sherman is outstanding. | Caleb is helpful. | entailment |
Conan is unfair.
Conan is helpful.
Tyler is not horrible.
Jeremiah is not helpful.
Sherman is unfair.
Kent is sad.
Conan is not outstanding.
Caleb is helpful.
Tyler is not unfair.
Tyler is not sad.
Sherman is not outstanding.
Tyler is not easy.Someone who is horrible is always unfair.
Someone is easy and not outstanding if and only if he is not unfair and horrible.
If Kent is horrible and Conan is not unfair, then Tyler is not helpful.
Caleb being not sad implies that Jeremiah is horrible and Caleb is helpful.
It can be concluded that Sherman is not horrible and Sherman is outstanding once knowing that Caleb is helpful and Tyler is not unfair.
If there is someone who is easy, then Conan is outstanding.
If everyone is sad or not outstanding, then Caleb is unfair.
If there is someone who is unfair, then Tyler is helpful and Jeremiah is easy.
It can be concluded that Tyler is not unfair once knowing that Ron is outstanding.
Someone is not sad and outstanding if and only if he is not horrible and not helpful.
If someone is unfair, then he is not helpful, and vice versa.
If Ron is sad, then Jeremiah is not easy and Sherman is outstanding. | Sherman is not helpful. | entailment |
Conan is unfair.
Conan is helpful.
Tyler is not horrible.
Jeremiah is not helpful.
Sherman is unfair.
Kent is sad.
Conan is not outstanding.
Caleb is helpful.
Tyler is not unfair.
Tyler is not sad.
Sherman is not outstanding.
Tyler is not easy.Someone who is horrible is always unfair.
Someone is easy and not outstanding if and only if he is not unfair and horrible.
If Kent is horrible and Conan is not unfair, then Tyler is not helpful.
Caleb being not sad implies that Jeremiah is horrible and Caleb is helpful.
It can be concluded that Sherman is not horrible and Sherman is outstanding once knowing that Caleb is helpful and Tyler is not unfair.
If there is someone who is easy, then Conan is outstanding.
If everyone is sad or not outstanding, then Caleb is unfair.
If there is someone who is unfair, then Tyler is helpful and Jeremiah is easy.
It can be concluded that Tyler is not unfair once knowing that Ron is outstanding.
Someone is not sad and outstanding if and only if he is not horrible and not helpful.
If someone is unfair, then he is not helpful, and vice versa.
If Ron is sad, then Jeremiah is not easy and Sherman is outstanding. | Conan is outstanding. | self_contradiction |
Conan is unfair.
Conan is helpful.
Tyler is not horrible.
Jeremiah is not helpful.
Sherman is unfair.
Kent is sad.
Conan is not outstanding.
Caleb is helpful.
Tyler is not unfair.
Tyler is not sad.
Sherman is not outstanding.
Tyler is not easy.Someone who is horrible is always unfair.
Someone is easy and not outstanding if and only if he is not unfair and horrible.
If Kent is horrible and Conan is not unfair, then Tyler is not helpful.
Caleb being not sad implies that Jeremiah is horrible and Caleb is helpful.
It can be concluded that Sherman is not horrible and Sherman is outstanding once knowing that Caleb is helpful and Tyler is not unfair.
If there is someone who is easy, then Conan is outstanding.
If everyone is sad or not outstanding, then Caleb is unfair.
If there is someone who is unfair, then Tyler is helpful and Jeremiah is easy.
It can be concluded that Tyler is not unfair once knowing that Ron is outstanding.
Someone is not sad and outstanding if and only if he is not horrible and not helpful.
If someone is unfair, then he is not helpful, and vice versa.
If Ron is sad, then Jeremiah is not easy and Sherman is outstanding. | Sherman is horrible. | contradiction |
Conan is unfair.
Conan is helpful.
Tyler is not horrible.
Jeremiah is not helpful.
Sherman is unfair.
Kent is sad.
Conan is not outstanding.
Caleb is helpful.
Tyler is not unfair.
Tyler is not sad.
Sherman is not outstanding.
Tyler is not easy.Someone who is horrible is always unfair.
Someone is easy and not outstanding if and only if he is not unfair and horrible.
If Kent is horrible and Conan is not unfair, then Tyler is not helpful.
Caleb being not sad implies that Jeremiah is horrible and Caleb is helpful.
It can be concluded that Sherman is not horrible and Sherman is outstanding once knowing that Caleb is helpful and Tyler is not unfair.
If there is someone who is easy, then Conan is outstanding.
If everyone is sad or not outstanding, then Caleb is unfair.
If there is someone who is unfair, then Tyler is helpful and Jeremiah is easy.
It can be concluded that Tyler is not unfair once knowing that Ron is outstanding.
Someone is not sad and outstanding if and only if he is not horrible and not helpful.
If someone is unfair, then he is not helpful, and vice versa.
If Ron is sad, then Jeremiah is not easy and Sherman is outstanding. | Tyler is not sad. | entailment |
Conan is unfair.
Conan is helpful.
Tyler is not horrible.
Jeremiah is not helpful.
Sherman is unfair.
Kent is sad.
Conan is not outstanding.
Caleb is helpful.
Tyler is not unfair.
Tyler is not sad.
Sherman is not outstanding.
Tyler is not easy.Someone who is horrible is always unfair.
Someone is easy and not outstanding if and only if he is not unfair and horrible.
If Kent is horrible and Conan is not unfair, then Tyler is not helpful.
Caleb being not sad implies that Jeremiah is horrible and Caleb is helpful.
It can be concluded that Sherman is not horrible and Sherman is outstanding once knowing that Caleb is helpful and Tyler is not unfair.
If there is someone who is easy, then Conan is outstanding.
If everyone is sad or not outstanding, then Caleb is unfair.
If there is someone who is unfair, then Tyler is helpful and Jeremiah is easy.
It can be concluded that Tyler is not unfair once knowing that Ron is outstanding.
Someone is not sad and outstanding if and only if he is not horrible and not helpful.
If someone is unfair, then he is not helpful, and vice versa.
If Ron is sad, then Jeremiah is not easy and Sherman is outstanding. | Conan is not helpful. | self_contradiction |
Conan is unfair.
Conan is helpful.
Tyler is not horrible.
Jeremiah is not helpful.
Sherman is unfair.
Kent is sad.
Conan is not outstanding.
Caleb is helpful.
Tyler is not unfair.
Tyler is not sad.
Sherman is not outstanding.
Tyler is not easy.Someone who is horrible is always unfair.
Someone is easy and not outstanding if and only if he is not unfair and horrible.
If Kent is horrible and Conan is not unfair, then Tyler is not helpful.
Caleb being not sad implies that Jeremiah is horrible and Caleb is helpful.
It can be concluded that Sherman is not horrible and Sherman is outstanding once knowing that Caleb is helpful and Tyler is not unfair.
If there is someone who is easy, then Conan is outstanding.
If everyone is sad or not outstanding, then Caleb is unfair.
If there is someone who is unfair, then Tyler is helpful and Jeremiah is easy.
It can be concluded that Tyler is not unfair once knowing that Ron is outstanding.
Someone is not sad and outstanding if and only if he is not horrible and not helpful.
If someone is unfair, then he is not helpful, and vice versa.
If Ron is sad, then Jeremiah is not easy and Sherman is outstanding. | Kent is not sad. | contradiction |
Conan is unfair.
Conan is helpful.
Tyler is not horrible.
Jeremiah is not helpful.
Sherman is unfair.
Kent is sad.
Conan is not outstanding.
Caleb is helpful.
Tyler is not unfair.
Tyler is not sad.
Sherman is not outstanding.
Tyler is not easy.Someone who is horrible is always unfair.
Someone is easy and not outstanding if and only if he is not unfair and horrible.
If Kent is horrible and Conan is not unfair, then Tyler is not helpful.
Caleb being not sad implies that Jeremiah is horrible and Caleb is helpful.
It can be concluded that Sherman is not horrible and Sherman is outstanding once knowing that Caleb is helpful and Tyler is not unfair.
If there is someone who is easy, then Conan is outstanding.
If everyone is sad or not outstanding, then Caleb is unfair.
If there is someone who is unfair, then Tyler is helpful and Jeremiah is easy.
It can be concluded that Tyler is not unfair once knowing that Ron is outstanding.
Someone is not sad and outstanding if and only if he is not horrible and not helpful.
If someone is unfair, then he is not helpful, and vice versa.
If Ron is sad, then Jeremiah is not easy and Sherman is outstanding. | Conan is helpful. | self_contradiction |
Conan is unfair.
Conan is helpful.
Tyler is not horrible.
Jeremiah is not helpful.
Sherman is unfair.
Kent is sad.
Conan is not outstanding.
Caleb is helpful.
Tyler is not unfair.
Tyler is not sad.
Sherman is not outstanding.
Tyler is not easy.Someone who is horrible is always unfair.
Someone is easy and not outstanding if and only if he is not unfair and horrible.
If Kent is horrible and Conan is not unfair, then Tyler is not helpful.
Caleb being not sad implies that Jeremiah is horrible and Caleb is helpful.
It can be concluded that Sherman is not horrible and Sherman is outstanding once knowing that Caleb is helpful and Tyler is not unfair.
If there is someone who is easy, then Conan is outstanding.
If everyone is sad or not outstanding, then Caleb is unfair.
If there is someone who is unfair, then Tyler is helpful and Jeremiah is easy.
It can be concluded that Tyler is not unfair once knowing that Ron is outstanding.
Someone is not sad and outstanding if and only if he is not horrible and not helpful.
If someone is unfair, then he is not helpful, and vice versa.
If Ron is sad, then Jeremiah is not easy and Sherman is outstanding. | Tyler is not helpful. | contradiction |
Conan is not steep.
Harlan is not rare.
Neil is not rare.
Lloyd is not global.
Channing is not global.
Conan is important.
Channing is steep.
Conan is not jealous.
Isaiah is important.
Isaiah is not additional.
Lloyd is steep.
Harlan is not global.If there is someone who is either important or rare, then Neil is not jealous.
Someone is global and jealous if and only if he is not important and additional.
Neil is jealous if and only if Marion is global.
If there is someone who is either not additional or global, then Lloyd is jealous.
Lloyd being important and Harlan being not steep imply that Channing is not global.
If Conan is jealous, then Lloyd is not important and Neil is not rare, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not jealous or not rare, then Conan is global.
Marion is not global if and only if Lloyd is not additional.
If someone is important and additional, then he is not steep, and vice versa.
Someone is not steep and jealous if and only if he is global.
If Harlan is global or Conan is jealous, then Marion is not rare.
Someone being both steep and additional is equivalent to being not jealous. | Marion is not steep. | neutral |
Conan is not steep.
Harlan is not rare.
Neil is not rare.
Lloyd is not global.
Channing is not global.
Conan is important.
Channing is steep.
Conan is not jealous.
Isaiah is important.
Isaiah is not additional.
Lloyd is steep.
Harlan is not global.If there is someone who is either important or rare, then Neil is not jealous.
Someone is global and jealous if and only if he is not important and additional.
Neil is jealous if and only if Marion is global.
If there is someone who is either not additional or global, then Lloyd is jealous.
Lloyd being important and Harlan being not steep imply that Channing is not global.
If Conan is jealous, then Lloyd is not important and Neil is not rare, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not jealous or not rare, then Conan is global.
Marion is not global if and only if Lloyd is not additional.
If someone is important and additional, then he is not steep, and vice versa.
Someone is not steep and jealous if and only if he is global.
If Harlan is global or Conan is jealous, then Marion is not rare.
Someone being both steep and additional is equivalent to being not jealous. | Isaiah is additional. | contradiction |
Conan is not steep.
Harlan is not rare.
Neil is not rare.
Lloyd is not global.
Channing is not global.
Conan is important.
Channing is steep.
Conan is not jealous.
Isaiah is important.
Isaiah is not additional.
Lloyd is steep.
Harlan is not global.If there is someone who is either important or rare, then Neil is not jealous.
Someone is global and jealous if and only if he is not important and additional.
Neil is jealous if and only if Marion is global.
If there is someone who is either not additional or global, then Lloyd is jealous.
Lloyd being important and Harlan being not steep imply that Channing is not global.
If Conan is jealous, then Lloyd is not important and Neil is not rare, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not jealous or not rare, then Conan is global.
Marion is not global if and only if Lloyd is not additional.
If someone is important and additional, then he is not steep, and vice versa.
Someone is not steep and jealous if and only if he is global.
If Harlan is global or Conan is jealous, then Marion is not rare.
Someone being both steep and additional is equivalent to being not jealous. | Neil is rare. | contradiction |
Conan is not steep.
Harlan is not rare.
Neil is not rare.
Lloyd is not global.
Channing is not global.
Conan is important.
Channing is steep.
Conan is not jealous.
Isaiah is important.
Isaiah is not additional.
Lloyd is steep.
Harlan is not global.If there is someone who is either important or rare, then Neil is not jealous.
Someone is global and jealous if and only if he is not important and additional.
Neil is jealous if and only if Marion is global.
If there is someone who is either not additional or global, then Lloyd is jealous.
Lloyd being important and Harlan being not steep imply that Channing is not global.
If Conan is jealous, then Lloyd is not important and Neil is not rare, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not jealous or not rare, then Conan is global.
Marion is not global if and only if Lloyd is not additional.
If someone is important and additional, then he is not steep, and vice versa.
Someone is not steep and jealous if and only if he is global.
If Harlan is global or Conan is jealous, then Marion is not rare.
Someone being both steep and additional is equivalent to being not jealous. | Conan is important. | self_contradiction |
Conan is not steep.
Harlan is not rare.
Neil is not rare.
Lloyd is not global.
Channing is not global.
Conan is important.
Channing is steep.
Conan is not jealous.
Isaiah is important.
Isaiah is not additional.
Lloyd is steep.
Harlan is not global.If there is someone who is either important or rare, then Neil is not jealous.
Someone is global and jealous if and only if he is not important and additional.
Neil is jealous if and only if Marion is global.
If there is someone who is either not additional or global, then Lloyd is jealous.
Lloyd being important and Harlan being not steep imply that Channing is not global.
If Conan is jealous, then Lloyd is not important and Neil is not rare, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not jealous or not rare, then Conan is global.
Marion is not global if and only if Lloyd is not additional.
If someone is important and additional, then he is not steep, and vice versa.
Someone is not steep and jealous if and only if he is global.
If Harlan is global or Conan is jealous, then Marion is not rare.
Someone being both steep and additional is equivalent to being not jealous. | Lloyd is important. | contradiction |
Conan is not steep.
Harlan is not rare.
Neil is not rare.
Lloyd is not global.
Channing is not global.
Conan is important.
Channing is steep.
Conan is not jealous.
Isaiah is important.
Isaiah is not additional.
Lloyd is steep.
Harlan is not global.If there is someone who is either important or rare, then Neil is not jealous.
Someone is global and jealous if and only if he is not important and additional.
Neil is jealous if and only if Marion is global.
If there is someone who is either not additional or global, then Lloyd is jealous.
Lloyd being important and Harlan being not steep imply that Channing is not global.
If Conan is jealous, then Lloyd is not important and Neil is not rare, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not jealous or not rare, then Conan is global.
Marion is not global if and only if Lloyd is not additional.
If someone is important and additional, then he is not steep, and vice versa.
Someone is not steep and jealous if and only if he is global.
If Harlan is global or Conan is jealous, then Marion is not rare.
Someone being both steep and additional is equivalent to being not jealous. | Lloyd is global. | contradiction |
Conan is not steep.
Harlan is not rare.
Neil is not rare.
Lloyd is not global.
Channing is not global.
Conan is important.
Channing is steep.
Conan is not jealous.
Isaiah is important.
Isaiah is not additional.
Lloyd is steep.
Harlan is not global.If there is someone who is either important or rare, then Neil is not jealous.
Someone is global and jealous if and only if he is not important and additional.
Neil is jealous if and only if Marion is global.
If there is someone who is either not additional or global, then Lloyd is jealous.
Lloyd being important and Harlan being not steep imply that Channing is not global.
If Conan is jealous, then Lloyd is not important and Neil is not rare, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not jealous or not rare, then Conan is global.
Marion is not global if and only if Lloyd is not additional.
If someone is important and additional, then he is not steep, and vice versa.
Someone is not steep and jealous if and only if he is global.
If Harlan is global or Conan is jealous, then Marion is not rare.
Someone being both steep and additional is equivalent to being not jealous. | Conan is not steep. | self_contradiction |
Conan is not steep.
Harlan is not rare.
Neil is not rare.
Lloyd is not global.
Channing is not global.
Conan is important.
Channing is steep.
Conan is not jealous.
Isaiah is important.
Isaiah is not additional.
Lloyd is steep.
Harlan is not global.If there is someone who is either important or rare, then Neil is not jealous.
Someone is global and jealous if and only if he is not important and additional.
Neil is jealous if and only if Marion is global.
If there is someone who is either not additional or global, then Lloyd is jealous.
Lloyd being important and Harlan being not steep imply that Channing is not global.
If Conan is jealous, then Lloyd is not important and Neil is not rare, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not jealous or not rare, then Conan is global.
Marion is not global if and only if Lloyd is not additional.
If someone is important and additional, then he is not steep, and vice versa.
Someone is not steep and jealous if and only if he is global.
If Harlan is global or Conan is jealous, then Marion is not rare.
Someone being both steep and additional is equivalent to being not jealous. | Lloyd is not global. | entailment |
Conan is not steep.
Harlan is not rare.
Neil is not rare.
Lloyd is not global.
Channing is not global.
Conan is important.
Channing is steep.
Conan is not jealous.
Isaiah is important.
Isaiah is not additional.
Lloyd is steep.
Harlan is not global.If there is someone who is either important or rare, then Neil is not jealous.
Someone is global and jealous if and only if he is not important and additional.
Neil is jealous if and only if Marion is global.
If there is someone who is either not additional or global, then Lloyd is jealous.
Lloyd being important and Harlan being not steep imply that Channing is not global.
If Conan is jealous, then Lloyd is not important and Neil is not rare, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not jealous or not rare, then Conan is global.
Marion is not global if and only if Lloyd is not additional.
If someone is important and additional, then he is not steep, and vice versa.
Someone is not steep and jealous if and only if he is global.
If Harlan is global or Conan is jealous, then Marion is not rare.
Someone being both steep and additional is equivalent to being not jealous. | Conan is not jealous. | self_contradiction |
Conan is not steep.
Harlan is not rare.
Neil is not rare.
Lloyd is not global.
Channing is not global.
Conan is important.
Channing is steep.
Conan is not jealous.
Isaiah is important.
Isaiah is not additional.
Lloyd is steep.
Harlan is not global.If there is someone who is either important or rare, then Neil is not jealous.
Someone is global and jealous if and only if he is not important and additional.
Neil is jealous if and only if Marion is global.
If there is someone who is either not additional or global, then Lloyd is jealous.
Lloyd being important and Harlan being not steep imply that Channing is not global.
If Conan is jealous, then Lloyd is not important and Neil is not rare, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not jealous or not rare, then Conan is global.
Marion is not global if and only if Lloyd is not additional.
If someone is important and additional, then he is not steep, and vice versa.
Someone is not steep and jealous if and only if he is global.
If Harlan is global or Conan is jealous, then Marion is not rare.
Someone being both steep and additional is equivalent to being not jealous. | Conan is not global. | contradiction |
Conan is not steep.
Harlan is not rare.
Neil is not rare.
Lloyd is not global.
Channing is not global.
Conan is important.
Channing is steep.
Conan is not jealous.
Isaiah is important.
Isaiah is not additional.
Lloyd is steep.
Harlan is not global.If there is someone who is either important or rare, then Neil is not jealous.
Someone is global and jealous if and only if he is not important and additional.
Neil is jealous if and only if Marion is global.
If there is someone who is either not additional or global, then Lloyd is jealous.
Lloyd being important and Harlan being not steep imply that Channing is not global.
If Conan is jealous, then Lloyd is not important and Neil is not rare, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not jealous or not rare, then Conan is global.
Marion is not global if and only if Lloyd is not additional.
If someone is important and additional, then he is not steep, and vice versa.
Someone is not steep and jealous if and only if he is global.
If Harlan is global or Conan is jealous, then Marion is not rare.
Someone being both steep and additional is equivalent to being not jealous. | Marion is important. | neutral |
Conan is not steep.
Harlan is not rare.
Neil is not rare.
Lloyd is not global.
Channing is not global.
Conan is important.
Channing is steep.
Conan is not jealous.
Isaiah is important.
Isaiah is not additional.
Lloyd is steep.
Harlan is not global.If there is someone who is either important or rare, then Neil is not jealous.
Someone is global and jealous if and only if he is not important and additional.
Neil is jealous if and only if Marion is global.
If there is someone who is either not additional or global, then Lloyd is jealous.
Lloyd being important and Harlan being not steep imply that Channing is not global.
If Conan is jealous, then Lloyd is not important and Neil is not rare, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not jealous or not rare, then Conan is global.
Marion is not global if and only if Lloyd is not additional.
If someone is important and additional, then he is not steep, and vice versa.
Someone is not steep and jealous if and only if he is global.
If Harlan is global or Conan is jealous, then Marion is not rare.
Someone being both steep and additional is equivalent to being not jealous. | Isaiah is rare. | neutral |
Conan is not steep.
Harlan is not rare.
Neil is not rare.
Lloyd is not global.
Channing is not global.
Conan is important.
Channing is steep.
Conan is not jealous.
Isaiah is important.
Isaiah is not additional.
Lloyd is steep.
Harlan is not global.If there is someone who is either important or rare, then Neil is not jealous.
Someone is global and jealous if and only if he is not important and additional.
Neil is jealous if and only if Marion is global.
If there is someone who is either not additional or global, then Lloyd is jealous.
Lloyd being important and Harlan being not steep imply that Channing is not global.
If Conan is jealous, then Lloyd is not important and Neil is not rare, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not jealous or not rare, then Conan is global.
Marion is not global if and only if Lloyd is not additional.
If someone is important and additional, then he is not steep, and vice versa.
Someone is not steep and jealous if and only if he is global.
If Harlan is global or Conan is jealous, then Marion is not rare.
Someone being both steep and additional is equivalent to being not jealous. | Channing is not global. | entailment |
Conan is not steep.
Harlan is not rare.
Neil is not rare.
Lloyd is not global.
Channing is not global.
Conan is important.
Channing is steep.
Conan is not jealous.
Isaiah is important.
Isaiah is not additional.
Lloyd is steep.
Harlan is not global.If there is someone who is either important or rare, then Neil is not jealous.
Someone is global and jealous if and only if he is not important and additional.
Neil is jealous if and only if Marion is global.
If there is someone who is either not additional or global, then Lloyd is jealous.
Lloyd being important and Harlan being not steep imply that Channing is not global.
If Conan is jealous, then Lloyd is not important and Neil is not rare, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not jealous or not rare, then Conan is global.
Marion is not global if and only if Lloyd is not additional.
If someone is important and additional, then he is not steep, and vice versa.
Someone is not steep and jealous if and only if he is global.
If Harlan is global or Conan is jealous, then Marion is not rare.
Someone being both steep and additional is equivalent to being not jealous. | Channing is steep. | entailment |
Conan is not steep.
Harlan is not rare.
Neil is not rare.
Lloyd is not global.
Channing is not global.
Conan is important.
Channing is steep.
Conan is not jealous.
Isaiah is important.
Isaiah is not additional.
Lloyd is steep.
Harlan is not global.If there is someone who is either important or rare, then Neil is not jealous.
Someone is global and jealous if and only if he is not important and additional.
Neil is jealous if and only if Marion is global.
If there is someone who is either not additional or global, then Lloyd is jealous.
Lloyd being important and Harlan being not steep imply that Channing is not global.
If Conan is jealous, then Lloyd is not important and Neil is not rare, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not jealous or not rare, then Conan is global.
Marion is not global if and only if Lloyd is not additional.
If someone is important and additional, then he is not steep, and vice versa.
Someone is not steep and jealous if and only if he is global.
If Harlan is global or Conan is jealous, then Marion is not rare.
Someone being both steep and additional is equivalent to being not jealous. | Lloyd is jealous. | entailment |
Conan is not steep.
Harlan is not rare.
Neil is not rare.
Lloyd is not global.
Channing is not global.
Conan is important.
Channing is steep.
Conan is not jealous.
Isaiah is important.
Isaiah is not additional.
Lloyd is steep.
Harlan is not global.If there is someone who is either important or rare, then Neil is not jealous.
Someone is global and jealous if and only if he is not important and additional.
Neil is jealous if and only if Marion is global.
If there is someone who is either not additional or global, then Lloyd is jealous.
Lloyd being important and Harlan being not steep imply that Channing is not global.
If Conan is jealous, then Lloyd is not important and Neil is not rare, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not jealous or not rare, then Conan is global.
Marion is not global if and only if Lloyd is not additional.
If someone is important and additional, then he is not steep, and vice versa.
Someone is not steep and jealous if and only if he is global.
If Harlan is global or Conan is jealous, then Marion is not rare.
Someone being both steep and additional is equivalent to being not jealous. | Conan is not rare. | neutral |
Conan is not steep.
Harlan is not rare.
Neil is not rare.
Lloyd is not global.
Channing is not global.
Conan is important.
Channing is steep.
Conan is not jealous.
Isaiah is important.
Isaiah is not additional.
Lloyd is steep.
Harlan is not global.If there is someone who is either important or rare, then Neil is not jealous.
Someone is global and jealous if and only if he is not important and additional.
Neil is jealous if and only if Marion is global.
If there is someone who is either not additional or global, then Lloyd is jealous.
Lloyd being important and Harlan being not steep imply that Channing is not global.
If Conan is jealous, then Lloyd is not important and Neil is not rare, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not jealous or not rare, then Conan is global.
Marion is not global if and only if Lloyd is not additional.
If someone is important and additional, then he is not steep, and vice versa.
Someone is not steep and jealous if and only if he is global.
If Harlan is global or Conan is jealous, then Marion is not rare.
Someone being both steep and additional is equivalent to being not jealous. | Channing is jealous. | neutral |
Conan is not steep.
Harlan is not rare.
Neil is not rare.
Lloyd is not global.
Channing is not global.
Conan is important.
Channing is steep.
Conan is not jealous.
Isaiah is important.
Isaiah is not additional.
Lloyd is steep.
Harlan is not global.If there is someone who is either important or rare, then Neil is not jealous.
Someone is global and jealous if and only if he is not important and additional.
Neil is jealous if and only if Marion is global.
If there is someone who is either not additional or global, then Lloyd is jealous.
Lloyd being important and Harlan being not steep imply that Channing is not global.
If Conan is jealous, then Lloyd is not important and Neil is not rare, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not jealous or not rare, then Conan is global.
Marion is not global if and only if Lloyd is not additional.
If someone is important and additional, then he is not steep, and vice versa.
Someone is not steep and jealous if and only if he is global.
If Harlan is global or Conan is jealous, then Marion is not rare.
Someone being both steep and additional is equivalent to being not jealous. | Conan is steep. | self_contradiction |
Conan is not steep.
Harlan is not rare.
Neil is not rare.
Lloyd is not global.
Channing is not global.
Conan is important.
Channing is steep.
Conan is not jealous.
Isaiah is important.
Isaiah is not additional.
Lloyd is steep.
Harlan is not global.If there is someone who is either important or rare, then Neil is not jealous.
Someone is global and jealous if and only if he is not important and additional.
Neil is jealous if and only if Marion is global.
If there is someone who is either not additional or global, then Lloyd is jealous.
Lloyd being important and Harlan being not steep imply that Channing is not global.
If Conan is jealous, then Lloyd is not important and Neil is not rare, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not jealous or not rare, then Conan is global.
Marion is not global if and only if Lloyd is not additional.
If someone is important and additional, then he is not steep, and vice versa.
Someone is not steep and jealous if and only if he is global.
If Harlan is global or Conan is jealous, then Marion is not rare.
Someone being both steep and additional is equivalent to being not jealous. | Conan is jealous. | self_contradiction |
Conan is not steep.
Harlan is not rare.
Neil is not rare.
Lloyd is not global.
Channing is not global.
Conan is important.
Channing is steep.
Conan is not jealous.
Isaiah is important.
Isaiah is not additional.
Lloyd is steep.
Harlan is not global.If there is someone who is either important or rare, then Neil is not jealous.
Someone is global and jealous if and only if he is not important and additional.
Neil is jealous if and only if Marion is global.
If there is someone who is either not additional or global, then Lloyd is jealous.
Lloyd being important and Harlan being not steep imply that Channing is not global.
If Conan is jealous, then Lloyd is not important and Neil is not rare, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not jealous or not rare, then Conan is global.
Marion is not global if and only if Lloyd is not additional.
If someone is important and additional, then he is not steep, and vice versa.
Someone is not steep and jealous if and only if he is global.
If Harlan is global or Conan is jealous, then Marion is not rare.
Someone being both steep and additional is equivalent to being not jealous. | Harlan is not global. | entailment |
Hamlin is not breakable.
Miranda is hurt.
James is not breakable.
Bert is not sleepy.
Hamlin is not hurt.
Hamlin is legal.
Lars is not breakable.
Bert is hurt.
Lars is not sleepy.
Miranda is not encouraging.
Lars is hurt.
Lars is cool.Someone who is hurt is always not legal.
It can be concluded that Bert is cool once knowing that James is not sleepy or Lars is not legal.
If there is at least one people who is both encouraging and breakable, then Hamlin is not legal.
Lars being legal is equivalent to James being cool and Hamlin being sleepy.
If someone who is not sleepy is also not cool, then he is breakable.
Someone who is eithor not legal or hurt is always not breakable.
Miranda being encouraging implies that Lars is not legal.
Miranda being not sleepy and Carolina being cool imply that Carolina is not hurt.
If there is at least one people who is not encouraging or not sleepy, then James is not breakable.
Someone being both hurt and not breakable is equivalent to being sleepy.
If someone is either cool or not hurt, then he is not encouraging and legal.
Someone being hurt is equivalent to being encouraging. | Carolina is not sleepy. | neutral |
Hamlin is not breakable.
Miranda is hurt.
James is not breakable.
Bert is not sleepy.
Hamlin is not hurt.
Hamlin is legal.
Lars is not breakable.
Bert is hurt.
Lars is not sleepy.
Miranda is not encouraging.
Lars is hurt.
Lars is cool.Someone who is hurt is always not legal.
It can be concluded that Bert is cool once knowing that James is not sleepy or Lars is not legal.
If there is at least one people who is both encouraging and breakable, then Hamlin is not legal.
Lars being legal is equivalent to James being cool and Hamlin being sleepy.
If someone who is not sleepy is also not cool, then he is breakable.
Someone who is eithor not legal or hurt is always not breakable.
Miranda being encouraging implies that Lars is not legal.
Miranda being not sleepy and Carolina being cool imply that Carolina is not hurt.
If there is at least one people who is not encouraging or not sleepy, then James is not breakable.
Someone being both hurt and not breakable is equivalent to being sleepy.
If someone is either cool or not hurt, then he is not encouraging and legal.
Someone being hurt is equivalent to being encouraging. | Miranda is not cool. | neutral |
Hamlin is not breakable.
Miranda is hurt.
James is not breakable.
Bert is not sleepy.
Hamlin is not hurt.
Hamlin is legal.
Lars is not breakable.
Bert is hurt.
Lars is not sleepy.
Miranda is not encouraging.
Lars is hurt.
Lars is cool.Someone who is hurt is always not legal.
It can be concluded that Bert is cool once knowing that James is not sleepy or Lars is not legal.
If there is at least one people who is both encouraging and breakable, then Hamlin is not legal.
Lars being legal is equivalent to James being cool and Hamlin being sleepy.
If someone who is not sleepy is also not cool, then he is breakable.
Someone who is eithor not legal or hurt is always not breakable.
Miranda being encouraging implies that Lars is not legal.
Miranda being not sleepy and Carolina being cool imply that Carolina is not hurt.
If there is at least one people who is not encouraging or not sleepy, then James is not breakable.
Someone being both hurt and not breakable is equivalent to being sleepy.
If someone is either cool or not hurt, then he is not encouraging and legal.
Someone being hurt is equivalent to being encouraging. | Jason is encouraging. | neutral |
Hamlin is not breakable.
Miranda is hurt.
James is not breakable.
Bert is not sleepy.
Hamlin is not hurt.
Hamlin is legal.
Lars is not breakable.
Bert is hurt.
Lars is not sleepy.
Miranda is not encouraging.
Lars is hurt.
Lars is cool.Someone who is hurt is always not legal.
It can be concluded that Bert is cool once knowing that James is not sleepy or Lars is not legal.
If there is at least one people who is both encouraging and breakable, then Hamlin is not legal.
Lars being legal is equivalent to James being cool and Hamlin being sleepy.
If someone who is not sleepy is also not cool, then he is breakable.
Someone who is eithor not legal or hurt is always not breakable.
Miranda being encouraging implies that Lars is not legal.
Miranda being not sleepy and Carolina being cool imply that Carolina is not hurt.
If there is at least one people who is not encouraging or not sleepy, then James is not breakable.
Someone being both hurt and not breakable is equivalent to being sleepy.
If someone is either cool or not hurt, then he is not encouraging and legal.
Someone being hurt is equivalent to being encouraging. | Bert is breakable. | contradiction |
Hamlin is not breakable.
Miranda is hurt.
James is not breakable.
Bert is not sleepy.
Hamlin is not hurt.
Hamlin is legal.
Lars is not breakable.
Bert is hurt.
Lars is not sleepy.
Miranda is not encouraging.
Lars is hurt.
Lars is cool.Someone who is hurt is always not legal.
It can be concluded that Bert is cool once knowing that James is not sleepy or Lars is not legal.
If there is at least one people who is both encouraging and breakable, then Hamlin is not legal.
Lars being legal is equivalent to James being cool and Hamlin being sleepy.
If someone who is not sleepy is also not cool, then he is breakable.
Someone who is eithor not legal or hurt is always not breakable.
Miranda being encouraging implies that Lars is not legal.
Miranda being not sleepy and Carolina being cool imply that Carolina is not hurt.
If there is at least one people who is not encouraging or not sleepy, then James is not breakable.
Someone being both hurt and not breakable is equivalent to being sleepy.
If someone is either cool or not hurt, then he is not encouraging and legal.
Someone being hurt is equivalent to being encouraging. | Lars is cool. | entailment |
Hamlin is not breakable.
Miranda is hurt.
James is not breakable.
Bert is not sleepy.
Hamlin is not hurt.
Hamlin is legal.
Lars is not breakable.
Bert is hurt.
Lars is not sleepy.
Miranda is not encouraging.
Lars is hurt.
Lars is cool.Someone who is hurt is always not legal.
It can be concluded that Bert is cool once knowing that James is not sleepy or Lars is not legal.
If there is at least one people who is both encouraging and breakable, then Hamlin is not legal.
Lars being legal is equivalent to James being cool and Hamlin being sleepy.
If someone who is not sleepy is also not cool, then he is breakable.
Someone who is eithor not legal or hurt is always not breakable.
Miranda being encouraging implies that Lars is not legal.
Miranda being not sleepy and Carolina being cool imply that Carolina is not hurt.
If there is at least one people who is not encouraging or not sleepy, then James is not breakable.
Someone being both hurt and not breakable is equivalent to being sleepy.
If someone is either cool or not hurt, then he is not encouraging and legal.
Someone being hurt is equivalent to being encouraging. | Lars is not cool. | contradiction |
Hamlin is not breakable.
Miranda is hurt.
James is not breakable.
Bert is not sleepy.
Hamlin is not hurt.
Hamlin is legal.
Lars is not breakable.
Bert is hurt.
Lars is not sleepy.
Miranda is not encouraging.
Lars is hurt.
Lars is cool.Someone who is hurt is always not legal.
It can be concluded that Bert is cool once knowing that James is not sleepy or Lars is not legal.
If there is at least one people who is both encouraging and breakable, then Hamlin is not legal.
Lars being legal is equivalent to James being cool and Hamlin being sleepy.
If someone who is not sleepy is also not cool, then he is breakable.
Someone who is eithor not legal or hurt is always not breakable.
Miranda being encouraging implies that Lars is not legal.
Miranda being not sleepy and Carolina being cool imply that Carolina is not hurt.
If there is at least one people who is not encouraging or not sleepy, then James is not breakable.
Someone being both hurt and not breakable is equivalent to being sleepy.
If someone is either cool or not hurt, then he is not encouraging and legal.
Someone being hurt is equivalent to being encouraging. | Hamlin is legal. | self_contradiction |
Hamlin is not breakable.
Miranda is hurt.
James is not breakable.
Bert is not sleepy.
Hamlin is not hurt.
Hamlin is legal.
Lars is not breakable.
Bert is hurt.
Lars is not sleepy.
Miranda is not encouraging.
Lars is hurt.
Lars is cool.Someone who is hurt is always not legal.
It can be concluded that Bert is cool once knowing that James is not sleepy or Lars is not legal.
If there is at least one people who is both encouraging and breakable, then Hamlin is not legal.
Lars being legal is equivalent to James being cool and Hamlin being sleepy.
If someone who is not sleepy is also not cool, then he is breakable.
Someone who is eithor not legal or hurt is always not breakable.
Miranda being encouraging implies that Lars is not legal.
Miranda being not sleepy and Carolina being cool imply that Carolina is not hurt.
If there is at least one people who is not encouraging or not sleepy, then James is not breakable.
Someone being both hurt and not breakable is equivalent to being sleepy.
If someone is either cool or not hurt, then he is not encouraging and legal.
Someone being hurt is equivalent to being encouraging. | Bert is hurt. | entailment |
Hamlin is not breakable.
Miranda is hurt.
James is not breakable.
Bert is not sleepy.
Hamlin is not hurt.
Hamlin is legal.
Lars is not breakable.
Bert is hurt.
Lars is not sleepy.
Miranda is not encouraging.
Lars is hurt.
Lars is cool.Someone who is hurt is always not legal.
It can be concluded that Bert is cool once knowing that James is not sleepy or Lars is not legal.
If there is at least one people who is both encouraging and breakable, then Hamlin is not legal.
Lars being legal is equivalent to James being cool and Hamlin being sleepy.
If someone who is not sleepy is also not cool, then he is breakable.
Someone who is eithor not legal or hurt is always not breakable.
Miranda being encouraging implies that Lars is not legal.
Miranda being not sleepy and Carolina being cool imply that Carolina is not hurt.
If there is at least one people who is not encouraging or not sleepy, then James is not breakable.
Someone being both hurt and not breakable is equivalent to being sleepy.
If someone is either cool or not hurt, then he is not encouraging and legal.
Someone being hurt is equivalent to being encouraging. | James is breakable. | contradiction |
Hamlin is not breakable.
Miranda is hurt.
James is not breakable.
Bert is not sleepy.
Hamlin is not hurt.
Hamlin is legal.
Lars is not breakable.
Bert is hurt.
Lars is not sleepy.
Miranda is not encouraging.
Lars is hurt.
Lars is cool.Someone who is hurt is always not legal.
It can be concluded that Bert is cool once knowing that James is not sleepy or Lars is not legal.
If there is at least one people who is both encouraging and breakable, then Hamlin is not legal.
Lars being legal is equivalent to James being cool and Hamlin being sleepy.
If someone who is not sleepy is also not cool, then he is breakable.
Someone who is eithor not legal or hurt is always not breakable.
Miranda being encouraging implies that Lars is not legal.
Miranda being not sleepy and Carolina being cool imply that Carolina is not hurt.
If there is at least one people who is not encouraging or not sleepy, then James is not breakable.
Someone being both hurt and not breakable is equivalent to being sleepy.
If someone is either cool or not hurt, then he is not encouraging and legal.
Someone being hurt is equivalent to being encouraging. | Miranda is not encouraging. | self_contradiction |
Hamlin is not breakable.
Miranda is hurt.
James is not breakable.
Bert is not sleepy.
Hamlin is not hurt.
Hamlin is legal.
Lars is not breakable.
Bert is hurt.
Lars is not sleepy.
Miranda is not encouraging.
Lars is hurt.
Lars is cool.Someone who is hurt is always not legal.
It can be concluded that Bert is cool once knowing that James is not sleepy or Lars is not legal.
If there is at least one people who is both encouraging and breakable, then Hamlin is not legal.
Lars being legal is equivalent to James being cool and Hamlin being sleepy.
If someone who is not sleepy is also not cool, then he is breakable.
Someone who is eithor not legal or hurt is always not breakable.
Miranda being encouraging implies that Lars is not legal.
Miranda being not sleepy and Carolina being cool imply that Carolina is not hurt.
If there is at least one people who is not encouraging or not sleepy, then James is not breakable.
Someone being both hurt and not breakable is equivalent to being sleepy.
If someone is either cool or not hurt, then he is not encouraging and legal.
Someone being hurt is equivalent to being encouraging. | Miranda is not legal. | entailment |
Hamlin is not breakable.
Miranda is hurt.
James is not breakable.
Bert is not sleepy.
Hamlin is not hurt.
Hamlin is legal.
Lars is not breakable.
Bert is hurt.
Lars is not sleepy.
Miranda is not encouraging.
Lars is hurt.
Lars is cool.Someone who is hurt is always not legal.
It can be concluded that Bert is cool once knowing that James is not sleepy or Lars is not legal.
If there is at least one people who is both encouraging and breakable, then Hamlin is not legal.
Lars being legal is equivalent to James being cool and Hamlin being sleepy.
If someone who is not sleepy is also not cool, then he is breakable.
Someone who is eithor not legal or hurt is always not breakable.
Miranda being encouraging implies that Lars is not legal.
Miranda being not sleepy and Carolina being cool imply that Carolina is not hurt.
If there is at least one people who is not encouraging or not sleepy, then James is not breakable.
Someone being both hurt and not breakable is equivalent to being sleepy.
If someone is either cool or not hurt, then he is not encouraging and legal.
Someone being hurt is equivalent to being encouraging. | Lars is hurt. | entailment |
Hamlin is not breakable.
Miranda is hurt.
James is not breakable.
Bert is not sleepy.
Hamlin is not hurt.
Hamlin is legal.
Lars is not breakable.
Bert is hurt.
Lars is not sleepy.
Miranda is not encouraging.
Lars is hurt.
Lars is cool.Someone who is hurt is always not legal.
It can be concluded that Bert is cool once knowing that James is not sleepy or Lars is not legal.
If there is at least one people who is both encouraging and breakable, then Hamlin is not legal.
Lars being legal is equivalent to James being cool and Hamlin being sleepy.
If someone who is not sleepy is also not cool, then he is breakable.
Someone who is eithor not legal or hurt is always not breakable.
Miranda being encouraging implies that Lars is not legal.
Miranda being not sleepy and Carolina being cool imply that Carolina is not hurt.
If there is at least one people who is not encouraging or not sleepy, then James is not breakable.
Someone being both hurt and not breakable is equivalent to being sleepy.
If someone is either cool or not hurt, then he is not encouraging and legal.
Someone being hurt is equivalent to being encouraging. | Miranda is encouraging. | self_contradiction |
Hamlin is not breakable.
Miranda is hurt.
James is not breakable.
Bert is not sleepy.
Hamlin is not hurt.
Hamlin is legal.
Lars is not breakable.
Bert is hurt.
Lars is not sleepy.
Miranda is not encouraging.
Lars is hurt.
Lars is cool.Someone who is hurt is always not legal.
It can be concluded that Bert is cool once knowing that James is not sleepy or Lars is not legal.
If there is at least one people who is both encouraging and breakable, then Hamlin is not legal.
Lars being legal is equivalent to James being cool and Hamlin being sleepy.
If someone who is not sleepy is also not cool, then he is breakable.
Someone who is eithor not legal or hurt is always not breakable.
Miranda being encouraging implies that Lars is not legal.
Miranda being not sleepy and Carolina being cool imply that Carolina is not hurt.
If there is at least one people who is not encouraging or not sleepy, then James is not breakable.
Someone being both hurt and not breakable is equivalent to being sleepy.
If someone is either cool or not hurt, then he is not encouraging and legal.
Someone being hurt is equivalent to being encouraging. | James is not encouraging. | entailment |
Hamlin is not breakable.
Miranda is hurt.
James is not breakable.
Bert is not sleepy.
Hamlin is not hurt.
Hamlin is legal.
Lars is not breakable.
Bert is hurt.
Lars is not sleepy.
Miranda is not encouraging.
Lars is hurt.
Lars is cool.Someone who is hurt is always not legal.
It can be concluded that Bert is cool once knowing that James is not sleepy or Lars is not legal.
If there is at least one people who is both encouraging and breakable, then Hamlin is not legal.
Lars being legal is equivalent to James being cool and Hamlin being sleepy.
If someone who is not sleepy is also not cool, then he is breakable.
Someone who is eithor not legal or hurt is always not breakable.
Miranda being encouraging implies that Lars is not legal.
Miranda being not sleepy and Carolina being cool imply that Carolina is not hurt.
If there is at least one people who is not encouraging or not sleepy, then James is not breakable.
Someone being both hurt and not breakable is equivalent to being sleepy.
If someone is either cool or not hurt, then he is not encouraging and legal.
Someone being hurt is equivalent to being encouraging. | Lars is legal. | self_contradiction |
Hamlin is not breakable.
Miranda is hurt.
James is not breakable.
Bert is not sleepy.
Hamlin is not hurt.
Hamlin is legal.
Lars is not breakable.
Bert is hurt.
Lars is not sleepy.
Miranda is not encouraging.
Lars is hurt.
Lars is cool.Someone who is hurt is always not legal.
It can be concluded that Bert is cool once knowing that James is not sleepy or Lars is not legal.
If there is at least one people who is both encouraging and breakable, then Hamlin is not legal.
Lars being legal is equivalent to James being cool and Hamlin being sleepy.
If someone who is not sleepy is also not cool, then he is breakable.
Someone who is eithor not legal or hurt is always not breakable.
Miranda being encouraging implies that Lars is not legal.
Miranda being not sleepy and Carolina being cool imply that Carolina is not hurt.
If there is at least one people who is not encouraging or not sleepy, then James is not breakable.
Someone being both hurt and not breakable is equivalent to being sleepy.
If someone is either cool or not hurt, then he is not encouraging and legal.
Someone being hurt is equivalent to being encouraging. | James is not cool. | contradiction |
Hamlin is not breakable.
Miranda is hurt.
James is not breakable.
Bert is not sleepy.
Hamlin is not hurt.
Hamlin is legal.
Lars is not breakable.
Bert is hurt.
Lars is not sleepy.
Miranda is not encouraging.
Lars is hurt.
Lars is cool.Someone who is hurt is always not legal.
It can be concluded that Bert is cool once knowing that James is not sleepy or Lars is not legal.
If there is at least one people who is both encouraging and breakable, then Hamlin is not legal.
Lars being legal is equivalent to James being cool and Hamlin being sleepy.
If someone who is not sleepy is also not cool, then he is breakable.
Someone who is eithor not legal or hurt is always not breakable.
Miranda being encouraging implies that Lars is not legal.
Miranda being not sleepy and Carolina being cool imply that Carolina is not hurt.
If there is at least one people who is not encouraging or not sleepy, then James is not breakable.
Someone being both hurt and not breakable is equivalent to being sleepy.
If someone is either cool or not hurt, then he is not encouraging and legal.
Someone being hurt is equivalent to being encouraging. | Jason is not cool. | neutral |
Hamlin is not breakable.
Miranda is hurt.
James is not breakable.
Bert is not sleepy.
Hamlin is not hurt.
Hamlin is legal.
Lars is not breakable.
Bert is hurt.
Lars is not sleepy.
Miranda is not encouraging.
Lars is hurt.
Lars is cool.Someone who is hurt is always not legal.
It can be concluded that Bert is cool once knowing that James is not sleepy or Lars is not legal.
If there is at least one people who is both encouraging and breakable, then Hamlin is not legal.
Lars being legal is equivalent to James being cool and Hamlin being sleepy.
If someone who is not sleepy is also not cool, then he is breakable.
Someone who is eithor not legal or hurt is always not breakable.
Miranda being encouraging implies that Lars is not legal.
Miranda being not sleepy and Carolina being cool imply that Carolina is not hurt.
If there is at least one people who is not encouraging or not sleepy, then James is not breakable.
Someone being both hurt and not breakable is equivalent to being sleepy.
If someone is either cool or not hurt, then he is not encouraging and legal.
Someone being hurt is equivalent to being encouraging. | Hamlin is not encouraging. | self_contradiction |
Hamlin is not breakable.
Miranda is hurt.
James is not breakable.
Bert is not sleepy.
Hamlin is not hurt.
Hamlin is legal.
Lars is not breakable.
Bert is hurt.
Lars is not sleepy.
Miranda is not encouraging.
Lars is hurt.
Lars is cool.Someone who is hurt is always not legal.
It can be concluded that Bert is cool once knowing that James is not sleepy or Lars is not legal.
If there is at least one people who is both encouraging and breakable, then Hamlin is not legal.
Lars being legal is equivalent to James being cool and Hamlin being sleepy.
If someone who is not sleepy is also not cool, then he is breakable.
Someone who is eithor not legal or hurt is always not breakable.
Miranda being encouraging implies that Lars is not legal.
Miranda being not sleepy and Carolina being cool imply that Carolina is not hurt.
If there is at least one people who is not encouraging or not sleepy, then James is not breakable.
Someone being both hurt and not breakable is equivalent to being sleepy.
If someone is either cool or not hurt, then he is not encouraging and legal.
Someone being hurt is equivalent to being encouraging. | Hamlin is not sleepy. | contradiction |
Hamlin is not breakable.
Miranda is hurt.
James is not breakable.
Bert is not sleepy.
Hamlin is not hurt.
Hamlin is legal.
Lars is not breakable.
Bert is hurt.
Lars is not sleepy.
Miranda is not encouraging.
Lars is hurt.
Lars is cool.Someone who is hurt is always not legal.
It can be concluded that Bert is cool once knowing that James is not sleepy or Lars is not legal.
If there is at least one people who is both encouraging and breakable, then Hamlin is not legal.
Lars being legal is equivalent to James being cool and Hamlin being sleepy.
If someone who is not sleepy is also not cool, then he is breakable.
Someone who is eithor not legal or hurt is always not breakable.
Miranda being encouraging implies that Lars is not legal.
Miranda being not sleepy and Carolina being cool imply that Carolina is not hurt.
If there is at least one people who is not encouraging or not sleepy, then James is not breakable.
Someone being both hurt and not breakable is equivalent to being sleepy.
If someone is either cool or not hurt, then he is not encouraging and legal.
Someone being hurt is equivalent to being encouraging. | Carolina is sleepy. | neutral |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.