premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Thomas is not excited.
Thomas is comprehensive.
Liam is political.
Neil is generous.
Phoebe is comprehensive.
Liam is determined.
Thomas is not generous.
Rupert is not comprehensive.
Rupert is political.
Liam is gentle.
Neil is not gentle.
Rupert is generous.If there is someone who is both gentle and not excited, then Liam is not comprehensive.
Alfred is excited and Phoebe is political if and only if Neil is not determined and Liam is not generous.
If everyone is not political, then Neil is not excited.
If someone is not political and excited, then he is both not gentle and not generous, and vice versa.
If Thomas is determined and Phoebe is political, then Rupert is not comprehensive.
If someone is not political, then he is both gentle and not comprehensive.
If someone is political, then he is both not gentle and not determined.
Thomas being not generous is equivalent to Alfred being not comprehensive and Kirk being not excited.
Someone is not political if and only if he is not determined.
If Kirk is not political, then Liam is gentle.
All generous people are comprehensive.
If there is someone who is either not excited or not determined, then Thomas is generous. | Kirk is not determined. | neutral |
Thomas is not excited.
Thomas is comprehensive.
Liam is political.
Neil is generous.
Phoebe is comprehensive.
Liam is determined.
Thomas is not generous.
Rupert is not comprehensive.
Rupert is political.
Liam is gentle.
Neil is not gentle.
Rupert is generous.If there is someone who is both gentle and not excited, then Liam is not comprehensive.
Alfred is excited and Phoebe is political if and only if Neil is not determined and Liam is not generous.
If everyone is not political, then Neil is not excited.
If someone is not political and excited, then he is both not gentle and not generous, and vice versa.
If Thomas is determined and Phoebe is political, then Rupert is not comprehensive.
If someone is not political, then he is both gentle and not comprehensive.
If someone is political, then he is both not gentle and not determined.
Thomas being not generous is equivalent to Alfred being not comprehensive and Kirk being not excited.
Someone is not political if and only if he is not determined.
If Kirk is not political, then Liam is gentle.
All generous people are comprehensive.
If there is someone who is either not excited or not determined, then Thomas is generous. | Neil is not comprehensive. | contradiction |
Thomas is not excited.
Thomas is comprehensive.
Liam is political.
Neil is generous.
Phoebe is comprehensive.
Liam is determined.
Thomas is not generous.
Rupert is not comprehensive.
Rupert is political.
Liam is gentle.
Neil is not gentle.
Rupert is generous.If there is someone who is both gentle and not excited, then Liam is not comprehensive.
Alfred is excited and Phoebe is political if and only if Neil is not determined and Liam is not generous.
If everyone is not political, then Neil is not excited.
If someone is not political and excited, then he is both not gentle and not generous, and vice versa.
If Thomas is determined and Phoebe is political, then Rupert is not comprehensive.
If someone is not political, then he is both gentle and not comprehensive.
If someone is political, then he is both not gentle and not determined.
Thomas being not generous is equivalent to Alfred being not comprehensive and Kirk being not excited.
Someone is not political if and only if he is not determined.
If Kirk is not political, then Liam is gentle.
All generous people are comprehensive.
If there is someone who is either not excited or not determined, then Thomas is generous. | Phoebe is not gentle. | neutral |
Thomas is not excited.
Thomas is comprehensive.
Liam is political.
Neil is generous.
Phoebe is comprehensive.
Liam is determined.
Thomas is not generous.
Rupert is not comprehensive.
Rupert is political.
Liam is gentle.
Neil is not gentle.
Rupert is generous.If there is someone who is both gentle and not excited, then Liam is not comprehensive.
Alfred is excited and Phoebe is political if and only if Neil is not determined and Liam is not generous.
If everyone is not political, then Neil is not excited.
If someone is not political and excited, then he is both not gentle and not generous, and vice versa.
If Thomas is determined and Phoebe is political, then Rupert is not comprehensive.
If someone is not political, then he is both gentle and not comprehensive.
If someone is political, then he is both not gentle and not determined.
Thomas being not generous is equivalent to Alfred being not comprehensive and Kirk being not excited.
Someone is not political if and only if he is not determined.
If Kirk is not political, then Liam is gentle.
All generous people are comprehensive.
If there is someone who is either not excited or not determined, then Thomas is generous. | Neil is generous. | entailment |
Thomas is not excited.
Thomas is comprehensive.
Liam is political.
Neil is generous.
Phoebe is comprehensive.
Liam is determined.
Thomas is not generous.
Rupert is not comprehensive.
Rupert is political.
Liam is gentle.
Neil is not gentle.
Rupert is generous.If there is someone who is both gentle and not excited, then Liam is not comprehensive.
Alfred is excited and Phoebe is political if and only if Neil is not determined and Liam is not generous.
If everyone is not political, then Neil is not excited.
If someone is not political and excited, then he is both not gentle and not generous, and vice versa.
If Thomas is determined and Phoebe is political, then Rupert is not comprehensive.
If someone is not political, then he is both gentle and not comprehensive.
If someone is political, then he is both not gentle and not determined.
Thomas being not generous is equivalent to Alfred being not comprehensive and Kirk being not excited.
Someone is not political if and only if he is not determined.
If Kirk is not political, then Liam is gentle.
All generous people are comprehensive.
If there is someone who is either not excited or not determined, then Thomas is generous. | Thomas is generous. | self_contradiction |
Thomas is not excited.
Thomas is comprehensive.
Liam is political.
Neil is generous.
Phoebe is comprehensive.
Liam is determined.
Thomas is not generous.
Rupert is not comprehensive.
Rupert is political.
Liam is gentle.
Neil is not gentle.
Rupert is generous.If there is someone who is both gentle and not excited, then Liam is not comprehensive.
Alfred is excited and Phoebe is political if and only if Neil is not determined and Liam is not generous.
If everyone is not political, then Neil is not excited.
If someone is not political and excited, then he is both not gentle and not generous, and vice versa.
If Thomas is determined and Phoebe is political, then Rupert is not comprehensive.
If someone is not political, then he is both gentle and not comprehensive.
If someone is political, then he is both not gentle and not determined.
Thomas being not generous is equivalent to Alfred being not comprehensive and Kirk being not excited.
Someone is not political if and only if he is not determined.
If Kirk is not political, then Liam is gentle.
All generous people are comprehensive.
If there is someone who is either not excited or not determined, then Thomas is generous. | Liam is not gentle. | self_contradiction |
Thomas is not excited.
Thomas is comprehensive.
Liam is political.
Neil is generous.
Phoebe is comprehensive.
Liam is determined.
Thomas is not generous.
Rupert is not comprehensive.
Rupert is political.
Liam is gentle.
Neil is not gentle.
Rupert is generous.If there is someone who is both gentle and not excited, then Liam is not comprehensive.
Alfred is excited and Phoebe is political if and only if Neil is not determined and Liam is not generous.
If everyone is not political, then Neil is not excited.
If someone is not political and excited, then he is both not gentle and not generous, and vice versa.
If Thomas is determined and Phoebe is political, then Rupert is not comprehensive.
If someone is not political, then he is both gentle and not comprehensive.
If someone is political, then he is both not gentle and not determined.
Thomas being not generous is equivalent to Alfred being not comprehensive and Kirk being not excited.
Someone is not political if and only if he is not determined.
If Kirk is not political, then Liam is gentle.
All generous people are comprehensive.
If there is someone who is either not excited or not determined, then Thomas is generous. | Thomas is not political. | neutral |
Thomas is not excited.
Thomas is comprehensive.
Liam is political.
Neil is generous.
Phoebe is comprehensive.
Liam is determined.
Thomas is not generous.
Rupert is not comprehensive.
Rupert is political.
Liam is gentle.
Neil is not gentle.
Rupert is generous.If there is someone who is both gentle and not excited, then Liam is not comprehensive.
Alfred is excited and Phoebe is political if and only if Neil is not determined and Liam is not generous.
If everyone is not political, then Neil is not excited.
If someone is not political and excited, then he is both not gentle and not generous, and vice versa.
If Thomas is determined and Phoebe is political, then Rupert is not comprehensive.
If someone is not political, then he is both gentle and not comprehensive.
If someone is political, then he is both not gentle and not determined.
Thomas being not generous is equivalent to Alfred being not comprehensive and Kirk being not excited.
Someone is not political if and only if he is not determined.
If Kirk is not political, then Liam is gentle.
All generous people are comprehensive.
If there is someone who is either not excited or not determined, then Thomas is generous. | Liam is not political. | self_contradiction |
Thomas is not excited.
Thomas is comprehensive.
Liam is political.
Neil is generous.
Phoebe is comprehensive.
Liam is determined.
Thomas is not generous.
Rupert is not comprehensive.
Rupert is political.
Liam is gentle.
Neil is not gentle.
Rupert is generous.If there is someone who is both gentle and not excited, then Liam is not comprehensive.
Alfred is excited and Phoebe is political if and only if Neil is not determined and Liam is not generous.
If everyone is not political, then Neil is not excited.
If someone is not political and excited, then he is both not gentle and not generous, and vice versa.
If Thomas is determined and Phoebe is political, then Rupert is not comprehensive.
If someone is not political, then he is both gentle and not comprehensive.
If someone is political, then he is both not gentle and not determined.
Thomas being not generous is equivalent to Alfred being not comprehensive and Kirk being not excited.
Someone is not political if and only if he is not determined.
If Kirk is not political, then Liam is gentle.
All generous people are comprehensive.
If there is someone who is either not excited or not determined, then Thomas is generous. | Phoebe is comprehensive. | entailment |
Thomas is not excited.
Thomas is comprehensive.
Liam is political.
Neil is generous.
Phoebe is comprehensive.
Liam is determined.
Thomas is not generous.
Rupert is not comprehensive.
Rupert is political.
Liam is gentle.
Neil is not gentle.
Rupert is generous.If there is someone who is both gentle and not excited, then Liam is not comprehensive.
Alfred is excited and Phoebe is political if and only if Neil is not determined and Liam is not generous.
If everyone is not political, then Neil is not excited.
If someone is not political and excited, then he is both not gentle and not generous, and vice versa.
If Thomas is determined and Phoebe is political, then Rupert is not comprehensive.
If someone is not political, then he is both gentle and not comprehensive.
If someone is political, then he is both not gentle and not determined.
Thomas being not generous is equivalent to Alfred being not comprehensive and Kirk being not excited.
Someone is not political if and only if he is not determined.
If Kirk is not political, then Liam is gentle.
All generous people are comprehensive.
If there is someone who is either not excited or not determined, then Thomas is generous. | Thomas is not excited. | entailment |
Thomas is not excited.
Thomas is comprehensive.
Liam is political.
Neil is generous.
Phoebe is comprehensive.
Liam is determined.
Thomas is not generous.
Rupert is not comprehensive.
Rupert is political.
Liam is gentle.
Neil is not gentle.
Rupert is generous.If there is someone who is both gentle and not excited, then Liam is not comprehensive.
Alfred is excited and Phoebe is political if and only if Neil is not determined and Liam is not generous.
If everyone is not political, then Neil is not excited.
If someone is not political and excited, then he is both not gentle and not generous, and vice versa.
If Thomas is determined and Phoebe is political, then Rupert is not comprehensive.
If someone is not political, then he is both gentle and not comprehensive.
If someone is political, then he is both not gentle and not determined.
Thomas being not generous is equivalent to Alfred being not comprehensive and Kirk being not excited.
Someone is not political if and only if he is not determined.
If Kirk is not political, then Liam is gentle.
All generous people are comprehensive.
If there is someone who is either not excited or not determined, then Thomas is generous. | Alfred is not determined. | neutral |
Thomas is not excited.
Thomas is comprehensive.
Liam is political.
Neil is generous.
Phoebe is comprehensive.
Liam is determined.
Thomas is not generous.
Rupert is not comprehensive.
Rupert is political.
Liam is gentle.
Neil is not gentle.
Rupert is generous.If there is someone who is both gentle and not excited, then Liam is not comprehensive.
Alfred is excited and Phoebe is political if and only if Neil is not determined and Liam is not generous.
If everyone is not political, then Neil is not excited.
If someone is not political and excited, then he is both not gentle and not generous, and vice versa.
If Thomas is determined and Phoebe is political, then Rupert is not comprehensive.
If someone is not political, then he is both gentle and not comprehensive.
If someone is political, then he is both not gentle and not determined.
Thomas being not generous is equivalent to Alfred being not comprehensive and Kirk being not excited.
Someone is not political if and only if he is not determined.
If Kirk is not political, then Liam is gentle.
All generous people are comprehensive.
If there is someone who is either not excited or not determined, then Thomas is generous. | Neil is not gentle. | entailment |
Thomas is not excited.
Thomas is comprehensive.
Liam is political.
Neil is generous.
Phoebe is comprehensive.
Liam is determined.
Thomas is not generous.
Rupert is not comprehensive.
Rupert is political.
Liam is gentle.
Neil is not gentle.
Rupert is generous.If there is someone who is both gentle and not excited, then Liam is not comprehensive.
Alfred is excited and Phoebe is political if and only if Neil is not determined and Liam is not generous.
If everyone is not political, then Neil is not excited.
If someone is not political and excited, then he is both not gentle and not generous, and vice versa.
If Thomas is determined and Phoebe is political, then Rupert is not comprehensive.
If someone is not political, then he is both gentle and not comprehensive.
If someone is political, then he is both not gentle and not determined.
Thomas being not generous is equivalent to Alfred being not comprehensive and Kirk being not excited.
Someone is not political if and only if he is not determined.
If Kirk is not political, then Liam is gentle.
All generous people are comprehensive.
If there is someone who is either not excited or not determined, then Thomas is generous. | Rupert is not comprehensive. | self_contradiction |
Thomas is not excited.
Thomas is comprehensive.
Liam is political.
Neil is generous.
Phoebe is comprehensive.
Liam is determined.
Thomas is not generous.
Rupert is not comprehensive.
Rupert is political.
Liam is gentle.
Neil is not gentle.
Rupert is generous.If there is someone who is both gentle and not excited, then Liam is not comprehensive.
Alfred is excited and Phoebe is political if and only if Neil is not determined and Liam is not generous.
If everyone is not political, then Neil is not excited.
If someone is not political and excited, then he is both not gentle and not generous, and vice versa.
If Thomas is determined and Phoebe is political, then Rupert is not comprehensive.
If someone is not political, then he is both gentle and not comprehensive.
If someone is political, then he is both not gentle and not determined.
Thomas being not generous is equivalent to Alfred being not comprehensive and Kirk being not excited.
Someone is not political if and only if he is not determined.
If Kirk is not political, then Liam is gentle.
All generous people are comprehensive.
If there is someone who is either not excited or not determined, then Thomas is generous. | Liam is gentle. | self_contradiction |
Thomas is not excited.
Thomas is comprehensive.
Liam is political.
Neil is generous.
Phoebe is comprehensive.
Liam is determined.
Thomas is not generous.
Rupert is not comprehensive.
Rupert is political.
Liam is gentle.
Neil is not gentle.
Rupert is generous.If there is someone who is both gentle and not excited, then Liam is not comprehensive.
Alfred is excited and Phoebe is political if and only if Neil is not determined and Liam is not generous.
If everyone is not political, then Neil is not excited.
If someone is not political and excited, then he is both not gentle and not generous, and vice versa.
If Thomas is determined and Phoebe is political, then Rupert is not comprehensive.
If someone is not political, then he is both gentle and not comprehensive.
If someone is political, then he is both not gentle and not determined.
Thomas being not generous is equivalent to Alfred being not comprehensive and Kirk being not excited.
Someone is not political if and only if he is not determined.
If Kirk is not political, then Liam is gentle.
All generous people are comprehensive.
If there is someone who is either not excited or not determined, then Thomas is generous. | Thomas is determined. | neutral |
Thomas is not excited.
Thomas is comprehensive.
Liam is political.
Neil is generous.
Phoebe is comprehensive.
Liam is determined.
Thomas is not generous.
Rupert is not comprehensive.
Rupert is political.
Liam is gentle.
Neil is not gentle.
Rupert is generous.If there is someone who is both gentle and not excited, then Liam is not comprehensive.
Alfred is excited and Phoebe is political if and only if Neil is not determined and Liam is not generous.
If everyone is not political, then Neil is not excited.
If someone is not political and excited, then he is both not gentle and not generous, and vice versa.
If Thomas is determined and Phoebe is political, then Rupert is not comprehensive.
If someone is not political, then he is both gentle and not comprehensive.
If someone is political, then he is both not gentle and not determined.
Thomas being not generous is equivalent to Alfred being not comprehensive and Kirk being not excited.
Someone is not political if and only if he is not determined.
If Kirk is not political, then Liam is gentle.
All generous people are comprehensive.
If there is someone who is either not excited or not determined, then Thomas is generous. | Thomas is comprehensive. | entailment |
Thomas is not excited.
Thomas is comprehensive.
Liam is political.
Neil is generous.
Phoebe is comprehensive.
Liam is determined.
Thomas is not generous.
Rupert is not comprehensive.
Rupert is political.
Liam is gentle.
Neil is not gentle.
Rupert is generous.If there is someone who is both gentle and not excited, then Liam is not comprehensive.
Alfred is excited and Phoebe is political if and only if Neil is not determined and Liam is not generous.
If everyone is not political, then Neil is not excited.
If someone is not political and excited, then he is both not gentle and not generous, and vice versa.
If Thomas is determined and Phoebe is political, then Rupert is not comprehensive.
If someone is not political, then he is both gentle and not comprehensive.
If someone is political, then he is both not gentle and not determined.
Thomas being not generous is equivalent to Alfred being not comprehensive and Kirk being not excited.
Someone is not political if and only if he is not determined.
If Kirk is not political, then Liam is gentle.
All generous people are comprehensive.
If there is someone who is either not excited or not determined, then Thomas is generous. | Neil is not generous. | contradiction |
Thomas is not excited.
Thomas is comprehensive.
Liam is political.
Neil is generous.
Phoebe is comprehensive.
Liam is determined.
Thomas is not generous.
Rupert is not comprehensive.
Rupert is political.
Liam is gentle.
Neil is not gentle.
Rupert is generous.If there is someone who is both gentle and not excited, then Liam is not comprehensive.
Alfred is excited and Phoebe is political if and only if Neil is not determined and Liam is not generous.
If everyone is not political, then Neil is not excited.
If someone is not political and excited, then he is both not gentle and not generous, and vice versa.
If Thomas is determined and Phoebe is political, then Rupert is not comprehensive.
If someone is not political, then he is both gentle and not comprehensive.
If someone is political, then he is both not gentle and not determined.
Thomas being not generous is equivalent to Alfred being not comprehensive and Kirk being not excited.
Someone is not political if and only if he is not determined.
If Kirk is not political, then Liam is gentle.
All generous people are comprehensive.
If there is someone who is either not excited or not determined, then Thomas is generous. | Alfred is comprehensive. | contradiction |
Thomas is not excited.
Thomas is comprehensive.
Liam is political.
Neil is generous.
Phoebe is comprehensive.
Liam is determined.
Thomas is not generous.
Rupert is not comprehensive.
Rupert is political.
Liam is gentle.
Neil is not gentle.
Rupert is generous.If there is someone who is both gentle and not excited, then Liam is not comprehensive.
Alfred is excited and Phoebe is political if and only if Neil is not determined and Liam is not generous.
If everyone is not political, then Neil is not excited.
If someone is not political and excited, then he is both not gentle and not generous, and vice versa.
If Thomas is determined and Phoebe is political, then Rupert is not comprehensive.
If someone is not political, then he is both gentle and not comprehensive.
If someone is political, then he is both not gentle and not determined.
Thomas being not generous is equivalent to Alfred being not comprehensive and Kirk being not excited.
Someone is not political if and only if he is not determined.
If Kirk is not political, then Liam is gentle.
All generous people are comprehensive.
If there is someone who is either not excited or not determined, then Thomas is generous. | Kirk is excited. | contradiction |
Thomas is not excited.
Thomas is comprehensive.
Liam is political.
Neil is generous.
Phoebe is comprehensive.
Liam is determined.
Thomas is not generous.
Rupert is not comprehensive.
Rupert is political.
Liam is gentle.
Neil is not gentle.
Rupert is generous.If there is someone who is both gentle and not excited, then Liam is not comprehensive.
Alfred is excited and Phoebe is political if and only if Neil is not determined and Liam is not generous.
If everyone is not political, then Neil is not excited.
If someone is not political and excited, then he is both not gentle and not generous, and vice versa.
If Thomas is determined and Phoebe is political, then Rupert is not comprehensive.
If someone is not political, then he is both gentle and not comprehensive.
If someone is political, then he is both not gentle and not determined.
Thomas being not generous is equivalent to Alfred being not comprehensive and Kirk being not excited.
Someone is not political if and only if he is not determined.
If Kirk is not political, then Liam is gentle.
All generous people are comprehensive.
If there is someone who is either not excited or not determined, then Thomas is generous. | Rupert is not generous. | contradiction |
Casper is dusty.
Baird is foolish.
Albern is not quiet.
Albern is not dusty.
Olin is ugly.
Leslie is not foolish.
Baird is few.
Casper is not foolish.
Maribel is quiet.
Albern is not ugly.
Albern is few.
Casper is quiet.If there is someone who is either not lively or few, then Olin is quiet.
If someone is both ugly and not lively, then he is quiet.
Someone being both quiet and ugly is equivalent to being lively.
Casper being not dusty implies that Leslie is not lively.
If there is at least one people who is not quiet, then Maribel is not few.
If everyone is not quiet or lively, then Baird is not foolish.
Casper is dusty if and only if Leslie is not quiet.
If there is someone who is dusty, then Maribel is few and Baird is foolish.
Someone is not few if and only if he is ugly.
All lively people are foolish.
Someone is quiet and few if and only if he is not ugly.
Someone being few is equivalent to being not lively. | Albern is lively. | contradiction |
Casper is dusty.
Baird is foolish.
Albern is not quiet.
Albern is not dusty.
Olin is ugly.
Leslie is not foolish.
Baird is few.
Casper is not foolish.
Maribel is quiet.
Albern is not ugly.
Albern is few.
Casper is quiet.If there is someone who is either not lively or few, then Olin is quiet.
If someone is both ugly and not lively, then he is quiet.
Someone being both quiet and ugly is equivalent to being lively.
Casper being not dusty implies that Leslie is not lively.
If there is at least one people who is not quiet, then Maribel is not few.
If everyone is not quiet or lively, then Baird is not foolish.
Casper is dusty if and only if Leslie is not quiet.
If there is someone who is dusty, then Maribel is few and Baird is foolish.
Someone is not few if and only if he is ugly.
All lively people are foolish.
Someone is quiet and few if and only if he is not ugly.
Someone being few is equivalent to being not lively. | Olin is lively. | entailment |
Casper is dusty.
Baird is foolish.
Albern is not quiet.
Albern is not dusty.
Olin is ugly.
Leslie is not foolish.
Baird is few.
Casper is not foolish.
Maribel is quiet.
Albern is not ugly.
Albern is few.
Casper is quiet.If there is someone who is either not lively or few, then Olin is quiet.
If someone is both ugly and not lively, then he is quiet.
Someone being both quiet and ugly is equivalent to being lively.
Casper being not dusty implies that Leslie is not lively.
If there is at least one people who is not quiet, then Maribel is not few.
If everyone is not quiet or lively, then Baird is not foolish.
Casper is dusty if and only if Leslie is not quiet.
If there is someone who is dusty, then Maribel is few and Baird is foolish.
Someone is not few if and only if he is ugly.
All lively people are foolish.
Someone is quiet and few if and only if he is not ugly.
Someone being few is equivalent to being not lively. | Casper is not quiet. | contradiction |
Casper is dusty.
Baird is foolish.
Albern is not quiet.
Albern is not dusty.
Olin is ugly.
Leslie is not foolish.
Baird is few.
Casper is not foolish.
Maribel is quiet.
Albern is not ugly.
Albern is few.
Casper is quiet.If there is someone who is either not lively or few, then Olin is quiet.
If someone is both ugly and not lively, then he is quiet.
Someone being both quiet and ugly is equivalent to being lively.
Casper being not dusty implies that Leslie is not lively.
If there is at least one people who is not quiet, then Maribel is not few.
If everyone is not quiet or lively, then Baird is not foolish.
Casper is dusty if and only if Leslie is not quiet.
If there is someone who is dusty, then Maribel is few and Baird is foolish.
Someone is not few if and only if he is ugly.
All lively people are foolish.
Someone is quiet and few if and only if he is not ugly.
Someone being few is equivalent to being not lively. | Albern is quiet. | self_contradiction |
Casper is dusty.
Baird is foolish.
Albern is not quiet.
Albern is not dusty.
Olin is ugly.
Leslie is not foolish.
Baird is few.
Casper is not foolish.
Maribel is quiet.
Albern is not ugly.
Albern is few.
Casper is quiet.If there is someone who is either not lively or few, then Olin is quiet.
If someone is both ugly and not lively, then he is quiet.
Someone being both quiet and ugly is equivalent to being lively.
Casper being not dusty implies that Leslie is not lively.
If there is at least one people who is not quiet, then Maribel is not few.
If everyone is not quiet or lively, then Baird is not foolish.
Casper is dusty if and only if Leslie is not quiet.
If there is someone who is dusty, then Maribel is few and Baird is foolish.
Someone is not few if and only if he is ugly.
All lively people are foolish.
Someone is quiet and few if and only if he is not ugly.
Someone being few is equivalent to being not lively. | Maribel is not ugly. | self_contradiction |
Casper is dusty.
Baird is foolish.
Albern is not quiet.
Albern is not dusty.
Olin is ugly.
Leslie is not foolish.
Baird is few.
Casper is not foolish.
Maribel is quiet.
Albern is not ugly.
Albern is few.
Casper is quiet.If there is someone who is either not lively or few, then Olin is quiet.
If someone is both ugly and not lively, then he is quiet.
Someone being both quiet and ugly is equivalent to being lively.
Casper being not dusty implies that Leslie is not lively.
If there is at least one people who is not quiet, then Maribel is not few.
If everyone is not quiet or lively, then Baird is not foolish.
Casper is dusty if and only if Leslie is not quiet.
If there is someone who is dusty, then Maribel is few and Baird is foolish.
Someone is not few if and only if he is ugly.
All lively people are foolish.
Someone is quiet and few if and only if he is not ugly.
Someone being few is equivalent to being not lively. | Mark is ugly. | neutral |
Casper is dusty.
Baird is foolish.
Albern is not quiet.
Albern is not dusty.
Olin is ugly.
Leslie is not foolish.
Baird is few.
Casper is not foolish.
Maribel is quiet.
Albern is not ugly.
Albern is few.
Casper is quiet.If there is someone who is either not lively or few, then Olin is quiet.
If someone is both ugly and not lively, then he is quiet.
Someone being both quiet and ugly is equivalent to being lively.
Casper being not dusty implies that Leslie is not lively.
If there is at least one people who is not quiet, then Maribel is not few.
If everyone is not quiet or lively, then Baird is not foolish.
Casper is dusty if and only if Leslie is not quiet.
If there is someone who is dusty, then Maribel is few and Baird is foolish.
Someone is not few if and only if he is ugly.
All lively people are foolish.
Someone is quiet and few if and only if he is not ugly.
Someone being few is equivalent to being not lively. | Maribel is not lively. | self_contradiction |
Casper is dusty.
Baird is foolish.
Albern is not quiet.
Albern is not dusty.
Olin is ugly.
Leslie is not foolish.
Baird is few.
Casper is not foolish.
Maribel is quiet.
Albern is not ugly.
Albern is few.
Casper is quiet.If there is someone who is either not lively or few, then Olin is quiet.
If someone is both ugly and not lively, then he is quiet.
Someone being both quiet and ugly is equivalent to being lively.
Casper being not dusty implies that Leslie is not lively.
If there is at least one people who is not quiet, then Maribel is not few.
If everyone is not quiet or lively, then Baird is not foolish.
Casper is dusty if and only if Leslie is not quiet.
If there is someone who is dusty, then Maribel is few and Baird is foolish.
Someone is not few if and only if he is ugly.
All lively people are foolish.
Someone is quiet and few if and only if he is not ugly.
Someone being few is equivalent to being not lively. | Olin is not quiet. | contradiction |
Casper is dusty.
Baird is foolish.
Albern is not quiet.
Albern is not dusty.
Olin is ugly.
Leslie is not foolish.
Baird is few.
Casper is not foolish.
Maribel is quiet.
Albern is not ugly.
Albern is few.
Casper is quiet.If there is someone who is either not lively or few, then Olin is quiet.
If someone is both ugly and not lively, then he is quiet.
Someone being both quiet and ugly is equivalent to being lively.
Casper being not dusty implies that Leslie is not lively.
If there is at least one people who is not quiet, then Maribel is not few.
If everyone is not quiet or lively, then Baird is not foolish.
Casper is dusty if and only if Leslie is not quiet.
If there is someone who is dusty, then Maribel is few and Baird is foolish.
Someone is not few if and only if he is ugly.
All lively people are foolish.
Someone is quiet and few if and only if he is not ugly.
Someone being few is equivalent to being not lively. | Mark is not foolish. | neutral |
Casper is dusty.
Baird is foolish.
Albern is not quiet.
Albern is not dusty.
Olin is ugly.
Leslie is not foolish.
Baird is few.
Casper is not foolish.
Maribel is quiet.
Albern is not ugly.
Albern is few.
Casper is quiet.If there is someone who is either not lively or few, then Olin is quiet.
If someone is both ugly and not lively, then he is quiet.
Someone being both quiet and ugly is equivalent to being lively.
Casper being not dusty implies that Leslie is not lively.
If there is at least one people who is not quiet, then Maribel is not few.
If everyone is not quiet or lively, then Baird is not foolish.
Casper is dusty if and only if Leslie is not quiet.
If there is someone who is dusty, then Maribel is few and Baird is foolish.
Someone is not few if and only if he is ugly.
All lively people are foolish.
Someone is quiet and few if and only if he is not ugly.
Someone being few is equivalent to being not lively. | Baird is few. | entailment |
Casper is dusty.
Baird is foolish.
Albern is not quiet.
Albern is not dusty.
Olin is ugly.
Leslie is not foolish.
Baird is few.
Casper is not foolish.
Maribel is quiet.
Albern is not ugly.
Albern is few.
Casper is quiet.If there is someone who is either not lively or few, then Olin is quiet.
If someone is both ugly and not lively, then he is quiet.
Someone being both quiet and ugly is equivalent to being lively.
Casper being not dusty implies that Leslie is not lively.
If there is at least one people who is not quiet, then Maribel is not few.
If everyone is not quiet or lively, then Baird is not foolish.
Casper is dusty if and only if Leslie is not quiet.
If there is someone who is dusty, then Maribel is few and Baird is foolish.
Someone is not few if and only if he is ugly.
All lively people are foolish.
Someone is quiet and few if and only if he is not ugly.
Someone being few is equivalent to being not lively. | Maribel is few. | self_contradiction |
Casper is dusty.
Baird is foolish.
Albern is not quiet.
Albern is not dusty.
Olin is ugly.
Leslie is not foolish.
Baird is few.
Casper is not foolish.
Maribel is quiet.
Albern is not ugly.
Albern is few.
Casper is quiet.If there is someone who is either not lively or few, then Olin is quiet.
If someone is both ugly and not lively, then he is quiet.
Someone being both quiet and ugly is equivalent to being lively.
Casper being not dusty implies that Leslie is not lively.
If there is at least one people who is not quiet, then Maribel is not few.
If everyone is not quiet or lively, then Baird is not foolish.
Casper is dusty if and only if Leslie is not quiet.
If there is someone who is dusty, then Maribel is few and Baird is foolish.
Someone is not few if and only if he is ugly.
All lively people are foolish.
Someone is quiet and few if and only if he is not ugly.
Someone being few is equivalent to being not lively. | Maribel is quiet. | entailment |
Casper is dusty.
Baird is foolish.
Albern is not quiet.
Albern is not dusty.
Olin is ugly.
Leslie is not foolish.
Baird is few.
Casper is not foolish.
Maribel is quiet.
Albern is not ugly.
Albern is few.
Casper is quiet.If there is someone who is either not lively or few, then Olin is quiet.
If someone is both ugly and not lively, then he is quiet.
Someone being both quiet and ugly is equivalent to being lively.
Casper being not dusty implies that Leslie is not lively.
If there is at least one people who is not quiet, then Maribel is not few.
If everyone is not quiet or lively, then Baird is not foolish.
Casper is dusty if and only if Leslie is not quiet.
If there is someone who is dusty, then Maribel is few and Baird is foolish.
Someone is not few if and only if he is ugly.
All lively people are foolish.
Someone is quiet and few if and only if he is not ugly.
Someone being few is equivalent to being not lively. | Mark is foolish. | neutral |
Casper is dusty.
Baird is foolish.
Albern is not quiet.
Albern is not dusty.
Olin is ugly.
Leslie is not foolish.
Baird is few.
Casper is not foolish.
Maribel is quiet.
Albern is not ugly.
Albern is few.
Casper is quiet.If there is someone who is either not lively or few, then Olin is quiet.
If someone is both ugly and not lively, then he is quiet.
Someone being both quiet and ugly is equivalent to being lively.
Casper being not dusty implies that Leslie is not lively.
If there is at least one people who is not quiet, then Maribel is not few.
If everyone is not quiet or lively, then Baird is not foolish.
Casper is dusty if and only if Leslie is not quiet.
If there is someone who is dusty, then Maribel is few and Baird is foolish.
Someone is not few if and only if he is ugly.
All lively people are foolish.
Someone is quiet and few if and only if he is not ugly.
Someone being few is equivalent to being not lively. | Baird is lively. | contradiction |
Casper is dusty.
Baird is foolish.
Albern is not quiet.
Albern is not dusty.
Olin is ugly.
Leslie is not foolish.
Baird is few.
Casper is not foolish.
Maribel is quiet.
Albern is not ugly.
Albern is few.
Casper is quiet.If there is someone who is either not lively or few, then Olin is quiet.
If someone is both ugly and not lively, then he is quiet.
Someone being both quiet and ugly is equivalent to being lively.
Casper being not dusty implies that Leslie is not lively.
If there is at least one people who is not quiet, then Maribel is not few.
If everyone is not quiet or lively, then Baird is not foolish.
Casper is dusty if and only if Leslie is not quiet.
If there is someone who is dusty, then Maribel is few and Baird is foolish.
Someone is not few if and only if he is ugly.
All lively people are foolish.
Someone is quiet and few if and only if he is not ugly.
Someone being few is equivalent to being not lively. | Albern is not ugly. | entailment |
Casper is dusty.
Baird is foolish.
Albern is not quiet.
Albern is not dusty.
Olin is ugly.
Leslie is not foolish.
Baird is few.
Casper is not foolish.
Maribel is quiet.
Albern is not ugly.
Albern is few.
Casper is quiet.If there is someone who is either not lively or few, then Olin is quiet.
If someone is both ugly and not lively, then he is quiet.
Someone being both quiet and ugly is equivalent to being lively.
Casper being not dusty implies that Leslie is not lively.
If there is at least one people who is not quiet, then Maribel is not few.
If everyone is not quiet or lively, then Baird is not foolish.
Casper is dusty if and only if Leslie is not quiet.
If there is someone who is dusty, then Maribel is few and Baird is foolish.
Someone is not few if and only if he is ugly.
All lively people are foolish.
Someone is quiet and few if and only if he is not ugly.
Someone being few is equivalent to being not lively. | Olin is few. | contradiction |
Casper is dusty.
Baird is foolish.
Albern is not quiet.
Albern is not dusty.
Olin is ugly.
Leslie is not foolish.
Baird is few.
Casper is not foolish.
Maribel is quiet.
Albern is not ugly.
Albern is few.
Casper is quiet.If there is someone who is either not lively or few, then Olin is quiet.
If someone is both ugly and not lively, then he is quiet.
Someone being both quiet and ugly is equivalent to being lively.
Casper being not dusty implies that Leslie is not lively.
If there is at least one people who is not quiet, then Maribel is not few.
If everyone is not quiet or lively, then Baird is not foolish.
Casper is dusty if and only if Leslie is not quiet.
If there is someone who is dusty, then Maribel is few and Baird is foolish.
Someone is not few if and only if he is ugly.
All lively people are foolish.
Someone is quiet and few if and only if he is not ugly.
Someone being few is equivalent to being not lively. | Albern is not lively. | entailment |
Casper is dusty.
Baird is foolish.
Albern is not quiet.
Albern is not dusty.
Olin is ugly.
Leslie is not foolish.
Baird is few.
Casper is not foolish.
Maribel is quiet.
Albern is not ugly.
Albern is few.
Casper is quiet.If there is someone who is either not lively or few, then Olin is quiet.
If someone is both ugly and not lively, then he is quiet.
Someone being both quiet and ugly is equivalent to being lively.
Casper being not dusty implies that Leslie is not lively.
If there is at least one people who is not quiet, then Maribel is not few.
If everyone is not quiet or lively, then Baird is not foolish.
Casper is dusty if and only if Leslie is not quiet.
If there is someone who is dusty, then Maribel is few and Baird is foolish.
Someone is not few if and only if he is ugly.
All lively people are foolish.
Someone is quiet and few if and only if he is not ugly.
Someone being few is equivalent to being not lively. | Albern is not quiet. | self_contradiction |
Casper is dusty.
Baird is foolish.
Albern is not quiet.
Albern is not dusty.
Olin is ugly.
Leslie is not foolish.
Baird is few.
Casper is not foolish.
Maribel is quiet.
Albern is not ugly.
Albern is few.
Casper is quiet.If there is someone who is either not lively or few, then Olin is quiet.
If someone is both ugly and not lively, then he is quiet.
Someone being both quiet and ugly is equivalent to being lively.
Casper being not dusty implies that Leslie is not lively.
If there is at least one people who is not quiet, then Maribel is not few.
If everyone is not quiet or lively, then Baird is not foolish.
Casper is dusty if and only if Leslie is not quiet.
If there is someone who is dusty, then Maribel is few and Baird is foolish.
Someone is not few if and only if he is ugly.
All lively people are foolish.
Someone is quiet and few if and only if he is not ugly.
Someone being few is equivalent to being not lively. | Maribel is not dusty. | neutral |
Casper is dusty.
Baird is foolish.
Albern is not quiet.
Albern is not dusty.
Olin is ugly.
Leslie is not foolish.
Baird is few.
Casper is not foolish.
Maribel is quiet.
Albern is not ugly.
Albern is few.
Casper is quiet.If there is someone who is either not lively or few, then Olin is quiet.
If someone is both ugly and not lively, then he is quiet.
Someone being both quiet and ugly is equivalent to being lively.
Casper being not dusty implies that Leslie is not lively.
If there is at least one people who is not quiet, then Maribel is not few.
If everyone is not quiet or lively, then Baird is not foolish.
Casper is dusty if and only if Leslie is not quiet.
If there is someone who is dusty, then Maribel is few and Baird is foolish.
Someone is not few if and only if he is ugly.
All lively people are foolish.
Someone is quiet and few if and only if he is not ugly.
Someone being few is equivalent to being not lively. | Baird is not dusty. | neutral |
Hubert is defeated.
Henry is not mental.
Tony is defeated.
Carlton is not curious.
Randolph is not right.
Walter is curious.
Hubert is not right.
Randolph is not placid.
Henry is not curious.
Henry is defeated.
Carlton is crazy.
Isaiah is crazy.Henry is mental if and only if Isaiah is not defeated and Walter is crazy.
If someone is defeated, then he is not curious, and vice versa.
If Walter is not curious, then Isaiah is defeated and Randolph is not mental, and vice versa.
As long as someone is crazy, he is mental and placid.
Someone is not crazy if and only if he is defeated.
If there is at least one people who is both not crazy and not placid, then Henry is not right.
If there is someone who is defeated, then Carlton is not curious.
If there is at least one people who is both not crazy and not right, then Tony is curious.
If someone is right or defeated, then he is not curious.
If someone is mental, then he is curious.
As long as someone is mental and placid, he is not curious and defeated.
If there is someone who is crazy, then Hubert is defeated and Hubert is right. | Walter is curious. | entailment |
Hubert is defeated.
Henry is not mental.
Tony is defeated.
Carlton is not curious.
Randolph is not right.
Walter is curious.
Hubert is not right.
Randolph is not placid.
Henry is not curious.
Henry is defeated.
Carlton is crazy.
Isaiah is crazy.Henry is mental if and only if Isaiah is not defeated and Walter is crazy.
If someone is defeated, then he is not curious, and vice versa.
If Walter is not curious, then Isaiah is defeated and Randolph is not mental, and vice versa.
As long as someone is crazy, he is mental and placid.
Someone is not crazy if and only if he is defeated.
If there is at least one people who is both not crazy and not placid, then Henry is not right.
If there is someone who is defeated, then Carlton is not curious.
If there is at least one people who is both not crazy and not right, then Tony is curious.
If someone is right or defeated, then he is not curious.
If someone is mental, then he is curious.
As long as someone is mental and placid, he is not curious and defeated.
If there is someone who is crazy, then Hubert is defeated and Hubert is right. | Tony is defeated. | entailment |
Hubert is defeated.
Henry is not mental.
Tony is defeated.
Carlton is not curious.
Randolph is not right.
Walter is curious.
Hubert is not right.
Randolph is not placid.
Henry is not curious.
Henry is defeated.
Carlton is crazy.
Isaiah is crazy.Henry is mental if and only if Isaiah is not defeated and Walter is crazy.
If someone is defeated, then he is not curious, and vice versa.
If Walter is not curious, then Isaiah is defeated and Randolph is not mental, and vice versa.
As long as someone is crazy, he is mental and placid.
Someone is not crazy if and only if he is defeated.
If there is at least one people who is both not crazy and not placid, then Henry is not right.
If there is someone who is defeated, then Carlton is not curious.
If there is at least one people who is both not crazy and not right, then Tony is curious.
If someone is right or defeated, then he is not curious.
If someone is mental, then he is curious.
As long as someone is mental and placid, he is not curious and defeated.
If there is someone who is crazy, then Hubert is defeated and Hubert is right. | Hubert is not curious. | entailment |
Hubert is defeated.
Henry is not mental.
Tony is defeated.
Carlton is not curious.
Randolph is not right.
Walter is curious.
Hubert is not right.
Randolph is not placid.
Henry is not curious.
Henry is defeated.
Carlton is crazy.
Isaiah is crazy.Henry is mental if and only if Isaiah is not defeated and Walter is crazy.
If someone is defeated, then he is not curious, and vice versa.
If Walter is not curious, then Isaiah is defeated and Randolph is not mental, and vice versa.
As long as someone is crazy, he is mental and placid.
Someone is not crazy if and only if he is defeated.
If there is at least one people who is both not crazy and not placid, then Henry is not right.
If there is someone who is defeated, then Carlton is not curious.
If there is at least one people who is both not crazy and not right, then Tony is curious.
If someone is right or defeated, then he is not curious.
If someone is mental, then he is curious.
As long as someone is mental and placid, he is not curious and defeated.
If there is someone who is crazy, then Hubert is defeated and Hubert is right. | Carlton is not placid. | contradiction |
Hubert is defeated.
Henry is not mental.
Tony is defeated.
Carlton is not curious.
Randolph is not right.
Walter is curious.
Hubert is not right.
Randolph is not placid.
Henry is not curious.
Henry is defeated.
Carlton is crazy.
Isaiah is crazy.Henry is mental if and only if Isaiah is not defeated and Walter is crazy.
If someone is defeated, then he is not curious, and vice versa.
If Walter is not curious, then Isaiah is defeated and Randolph is not mental, and vice versa.
As long as someone is crazy, he is mental and placid.
Someone is not crazy if and only if he is defeated.
If there is at least one people who is both not crazy and not placid, then Henry is not right.
If there is someone who is defeated, then Carlton is not curious.
If there is at least one people who is both not crazy and not right, then Tony is curious.
If someone is right or defeated, then he is not curious.
If someone is mental, then he is curious.
As long as someone is mental and placid, he is not curious and defeated.
If there is someone who is crazy, then Hubert is defeated and Hubert is right. | Carlton is not mental. | contradiction |
Hubert is defeated.
Henry is not mental.
Tony is defeated.
Carlton is not curious.
Randolph is not right.
Walter is curious.
Hubert is not right.
Randolph is not placid.
Henry is not curious.
Henry is defeated.
Carlton is crazy.
Isaiah is crazy.Henry is mental if and only if Isaiah is not defeated and Walter is crazy.
If someone is defeated, then he is not curious, and vice versa.
If Walter is not curious, then Isaiah is defeated and Randolph is not mental, and vice versa.
As long as someone is crazy, he is mental and placid.
Someone is not crazy if and only if he is defeated.
If there is at least one people who is both not crazy and not placid, then Henry is not right.
If there is someone who is defeated, then Carlton is not curious.
If there is at least one people who is both not crazy and not right, then Tony is curious.
If someone is right or defeated, then he is not curious.
If someone is mental, then he is curious.
As long as someone is mental and placid, he is not curious and defeated.
If there is someone who is crazy, then Hubert is defeated and Hubert is right. | Isaiah is crazy. | self_contradiction |
Hubert is defeated.
Henry is not mental.
Tony is defeated.
Carlton is not curious.
Randolph is not right.
Walter is curious.
Hubert is not right.
Randolph is not placid.
Henry is not curious.
Henry is defeated.
Carlton is crazy.
Isaiah is crazy.Henry is mental if and only if Isaiah is not defeated and Walter is crazy.
If someone is defeated, then he is not curious, and vice versa.
If Walter is not curious, then Isaiah is defeated and Randolph is not mental, and vice versa.
As long as someone is crazy, he is mental and placid.
Someone is not crazy if and only if he is defeated.
If there is at least one people who is both not crazy and not placid, then Henry is not right.
If there is someone who is defeated, then Carlton is not curious.
If there is at least one people who is both not crazy and not right, then Tony is curious.
If someone is right or defeated, then he is not curious.
If someone is mental, then he is curious.
As long as someone is mental and placid, he is not curious and defeated.
If there is someone who is crazy, then Hubert is defeated and Hubert is right. | Henry is not defeated. | contradiction |
Hubert is defeated.
Henry is not mental.
Tony is defeated.
Carlton is not curious.
Randolph is not right.
Walter is curious.
Hubert is not right.
Randolph is not placid.
Henry is not curious.
Henry is defeated.
Carlton is crazy.
Isaiah is crazy.Henry is mental if and only if Isaiah is not defeated and Walter is crazy.
If someone is defeated, then he is not curious, and vice versa.
If Walter is not curious, then Isaiah is defeated and Randolph is not mental, and vice versa.
As long as someone is crazy, he is mental and placid.
Someone is not crazy if and only if he is defeated.
If there is at least one people who is both not crazy and not placid, then Henry is not right.
If there is someone who is defeated, then Carlton is not curious.
If there is at least one people who is both not crazy and not right, then Tony is curious.
If someone is right or defeated, then he is not curious.
If someone is mental, then he is curious.
As long as someone is mental and placid, he is not curious and defeated.
If there is someone who is crazy, then Hubert is defeated and Hubert is right. | Tony is not mental. | neutral |
Hubert is defeated.
Henry is not mental.
Tony is defeated.
Carlton is not curious.
Randolph is not right.
Walter is curious.
Hubert is not right.
Randolph is not placid.
Henry is not curious.
Henry is defeated.
Carlton is crazy.
Isaiah is crazy.Henry is mental if and only if Isaiah is not defeated and Walter is crazy.
If someone is defeated, then he is not curious, and vice versa.
If Walter is not curious, then Isaiah is defeated and Randolph is not mental, and vice versa.
As long as someone is crazy, he is mental and placid.
Someone is not crazy if and only if he is defeated.
If there is at least one people who is both not crazy and not placid, then Henry is not right.
If there is someone who is defeated, then Carlton is not curious.
If there is at least one people who is both not crazy and not right, then Tony is curious.
If someone is right or defeated, then he is not curious.
If someone is mental, then he is curious.
As long as someone is mental and placid, he is not curious and defeated.
If there is someone who is crazy, then Hubert is defeated and Hubert is right. | Randolph is mental. | neutral |
Hubert is defeated.
Henry is not mental.
Tony is defeated.
Carlton is not curious.
Randolph is not right.
Walter is curious.
Hubert is not right.
Randolph is not placid.
Henry is not curious.
Henry is defeated.
Carlton is crazy.
Isaiah is crazy.Henry is mental if and only if Isaiah is not defeated and Walter is crazy.
If someone is defeated, then he is not curious, and vice versa.
If Walter is not curious, then Isaiah is defeated and Randolph is not mental, and vice versa.
As long as someone is crazy, he is mental and placid.
Someone is not crazy if and only if he is defeated.
If there is at least one people who is both not crazy and not placid, then Henry is not right.
If there is someone who is defeated, then Carlton is not curious.
If there is at least one people who is both not crazy and not right, then Tony is curious.
If someone is right or defeated, then he is not curious.
If someone is mental, then he is curious.
As long as someone is mental and placid, he is not curious and defeated.
If there is someone who is crazy, then Hubert is defeated and Hubert is right. | Carlton is not defeated. | contradiction |
Hubert is defeated.
Henry is not mental.
Tony is defeated.
Carlton is not curious.
Randolph is not right.
Walter is curious.
Hubert is not right.
Randolph is not placid.
Henry is not curious.
Henry is defeated.
Carlton is crazy.
Isaiah is crazy.Henry is mental if and only if Isaiah is not defeated and Walter is crazy.
If someone is defeated, then he is not curious, and vice versa.
If Walter is not curious, then Isaiah is defeated and Randolph is not mental, and vice versa.
As long as someone is crazy, he is mental and placid.
Someone is not crazy if and only if he is defeated.
If there is at least one people who is both not crazy and not placid, then Henry is not right.
If there is someone who is defeated, then Carlton is not curious.
If there is at least one people who is both not crazy and not right, then Tony is curious.
If someone is right or defeated, then he is not curious.
If someone is mental, then he is curious.
As long as someone is mental and placid, he is not curious and defeated.
If there is someone who is crazy, then Hubert is defeated and Hubert is right. | Tony is not defeated. | contradiction |
Hubert is defeated.
Henry is not mental.
Tony is defeated.
Carlton is not curious.
Randolph is not right.
Walter is curious.
Hubert is not right.
Randolph is not placid.
Henry is not curious.
Henry is defeated.
Carlton is crazy.
Isaiah is crazy.Henry is mental if and only if Isaiah is not defeated and Walter is crazy.
If someone is defeated, then he is not curious, and vice versa.
If Walter is not curious, then Isaiah is defeated and Randolph is not mental, and vice versa.
As long as someone is crazy, he is mental and placid.
Someone is not crazy if and only if he is defeated.
If there is at least one people who is both not crazy and not placid, then Henry is not right.
If there is someone who is defeated, then Carlton is not curious.
If there is at least one people who is both not crazy and not right, then Tony is curious.
If someone is right or defeated, then he is not curious.
If someone is mental, then he is curious.
As long as someone is mental and placid, he is not curious and defeated.
If there is someone who is crazy, then Hubert is defeated and Hubert is right. | Randolph is not defeated. | neutral |
Hubert is defeated.
Henry is not mental.
Tony is defeated.
Carlton is not curious.
Randolph is not right.
Walter is curious.
Hubert is not right.
Randolph is not placid.
Henry is not curious.
Henry is defeated.
Carlton is crazy.
Isaiah is crazy.Henry is mental if and only if Isaiah is not defeated and Walter is crazy.
If someone is defeated, then he is not curious, and vice versa.
If Walter is not curious, then Isaiah is defeated and Randolph is not mental, and vice versa.
As long as someone is crazy, he is mental and placid.
Someone is not crazy if and only if he is defeated.
If there is at least one people who is both not crazy and not placid, then Henry is not right.
If there is someone who is defeated, then Carlton is not curious.
If there is at least one people who is both not crazy and not right, then Tony is curious.
If someone is right or defeated, then he is not curious.
If someone is mental, then he is curious.
As long as someone is mental and placid, he is not curious and defeated.
If there is someone who is crazy, then Hubert is defeated and Hubert is right. | Isaiah is placid. | entailment |
Hubert is defeated.
Henry is not mental.
Tony is defeated.
Carlton is not curious.
Randolph is not right.
Walter is curious.
Hubert is not right.
Randolph is not placid.
Henry is not curious.
Henry is defeated.
Carlton is crazy.
Isaiah is crazy.Henry is mental if and only if Isaiah is not defeated and Walter is crazy.
If someone is defeated, then he is not curious, and vice versa.
If Walter is not curious, then Isaiah is defeated and Randolph is not mental, and vice versa.
As long as someone is crazy, he is mental and placid.
Someone is not crazy if and only if he is defeated.
If there is at least one people who is both not crazy and not placid, then Henry is not right.
If there is someone who is defeated, then Carlton is not curious.
If there is at least one people who is both not crazy and not right, then Tony is curious.
If someone is right or defeated, then he is not curious.
If someone is mental, then he is curious.
As long as someone is mental and placid, he is not curious and defeated.
If there is someone who is crazy, then Hubert is defeated and Hubert is right. | Isaiah is not curious. | self_contradiction |
Hubert is defeated.
Henry is not mental.
Tony is defeated.
Carlton is not curious.
Randolph is not right.
Walter is curious.
Hubert is not right.
Randolph is not placid.
Henry is not curious.
Henry is defeated.
Carlton is crazy.
Isaiah is crazy.Henry is mental if and only if Isaiah is not defeated and Walter is crazy.
If someone is defeated, then he is not curious, and vice versa.
If Walter is not curious, then Isaiah is defeated and Randolph is not mental, and vice versa.
As long as someone is crazy, he is mental and placid.
Someone is not crazy if and only if he is defeated.
If there is at least one people who is both not crazy and not placid, then Henry is not right.
If there is someone who is defeated, then Carlton is not curious.
If there is at least one people who is both not crazy and not right, then Tony is curious.
If someone is right or defeated, then he is not curious.
If someone is mental, then he is curious.
As long as someone is mental and placid, he is not curious and defeated.
If there is someone who is crazy, then Hubert is defeated and Hubert is right. | Isaiah is not crazy. | self_contradiction |
Hubert is defeated.
Henry is not mental.
Tony is defeated.
Carlton is not curious.
Randolph is not right.
Walter is curious.
Hubert is not right.
Randolph is not placid.
Henry is not curious.
Henry is defeated.
Carlton is crazy.
Isaiah is crazy.Henry is mental if and only if Isaiah is not defeated and Walter is crazy.
If someone is defeated, then he is not curious, and vice versa.
If Walter is not curious, then Isaiah is defeated and Randolph is not mental, and vice versa.
As long as someone is crazy, he is mental and placid.
Someone is not crazy if and only if he is defeated.
If there is at least one people who is both not crazy and not placid, then Henry is not right.
If there is someone who is defeated, then Carlton is not curious.
If there is at least one people who is both not crazy and not right, then Tony is curious.
If someone is right or defeated, then he is not curious.
If someone is mental, then he is curious.
As long as someone is mental and placid, he is not curious and defeated.
If there is someone who is crazy, then Hubert is defeated and Hubert is right. | Tony is right. | neutral |
Hubert is defeated.
Henry is not mental.
Tony is defeated.
Carlton is not curious.
Randolph is not right.
Walter is curious.
Hubert is not right.
Randolph is not placid.
Henry is not curious.
Henry is defeated.
Carlton is crazy.
Isaiah is crazy.Henry is mental if and only if Isaiah is not defeated and Walter is crazy.
If someone is defeated, then he is not curious, and vice versa.
If Walter is not curious, then Isaiah is defeated and Randolph is not mental, and vice versa.
As long as someone is crazy, he is mental and placid.
Someone is not crazy if and only if he is defeated.
If there is at least one people who is both not crazy and not placid, then Henry is not right.
If there is someone who is defeated, then Carlton is not curious.
If there is at least one people who is both not crazy and not right, then Tony is curious.
If someone is right or defeated, then he is not curious.
If someone is mental, then he is curious.
As long as someone is mental and placid, he is not curious and defeated.
If there is someone who is crazy, then Hubert is defeated and Hubert is right. | Tony is not crazy. | entailment |
Hubert is defeated.
Henry is not mental.
Tony is defeated.
Carlton is not curious.
Randolph is not right.
Walter is curious.
Hubert is not right.
Randolph is not placid.
Henry is not curious.
Henry is defeated.
Carlton is crazy.
Isaiah is crazy.Henry is mental if and only if Isaiah is not defeated and Walter is crazy.
If someone is defeated, then he is not curious, and vice versa.
If Walter is not curious, then Isaiah is defeated and Randolph is not mental, and vice versa.
As long as someone is crazy, he is mental and placid.
Someone is not crazy if and only if he is defeated.
If there is at least one people who is both not crazy and not placid, then Henry is not right.
If there is someone who is defeated, then Carlton is not curious.
If there is at least one people who is both not crazy and not right, then Tony is curious.
If someone is right or defeated, then he is not curious.
If someone is mental, then he is curious.
As long as someone is mental and placid, he is not curious and defeated.
If there is someone who is crazy, then Hubert is defeated and Hubert is right. | Carlton is not crazy. | self_contradiction |
Hubert is defeated.
Henry is not mental.
Tony is defeated.
Carlton is not curious.
Randolph is not right.
Walter is curious.
Hubert is not right.
Randolph is not placid.
Henry is not curious.
Henry is defeated.
Carlton is crazy.
Isaiah is crazy.Henry is mental if and only if Isaiah is not defeated and Walter is crazy.
If someone is defeated, then he is not curious, and vice versa.
If Walter is not curious, then Isaiah is defeated and Randolph is not mental, and vice versa.
As long as someone is crazy, he is mental and placid.
Someone is not crazy if and only if he is defeated.
If there is at least one people who is both not crazy and not placid, then Henry is not right.
If there is someone who is defeated, then Carlton is not curious.
If there is at least one people who is both not crazy and not right, then Tony is curious.
If someone is right or defeated, then he is not curious.
If someone is mental, then he is curious.
As long as someone is mental and placid, he is not curious and defeated.
If there is someone who is crazy, then Hubert is defeated and Hubert is right. | Carlton is crazy. | self_contradiction |
Hubert is defeated.
Henry is not mental.
Tony is defeated.
Carlton is not curious.
Randolph is not right.
Walter is curious.
Hubert is not right.
Randolph is not placid.
Henry is not curious.
Henry is defeated.
Carlton is crazy.
Isaiah is crazy.Henry is mental if and only if Isaiah is not defeated and Walter is crazy.
If someone is defeated, then he is not curious, and vice versa.
If Walter is not curious, then Isaiah is defeated and Randolph is not mental, and vice versa.
As long as someone is crazy, he is mental and placid.
Someone is not crazy if and only if he is defeated.
If there is at least one people who is both not crazy and not placid, then Henry is not right.
If there is someone who is defeated, then Carlton is not curious.
If there is at least one people who is both not crazy and not right, then Tony is curious.
If someone is right or defeated, then he is not curious.
If someone is mental, then he is curious.
As long as someone is mental and placid, he is not curious and defeated.
If there is someone who is crazy, then Hubert is defeated and Hubert is right. | Walter is not right. | neutral |
Hunter is not fine.
Coleman is not bloody.
Coleman is fine.
Melody is not blue-eyed.
Melody is not annoyed.
Melody is not sincere.
Melody is not ancient.
Melody is not fine.
Coleman is not ancient.
Kimberly is ancient.
Kimberly is annoyed.
Hunter is blue-eyed.If Kimberly is not blue-eyed and Laurence is fine, then Sophie is bloody and Melody is annoyed, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is annoyed or ancient, then Sophie is sincere.
Someone who is eithor fine or not bloody is always ancient.
Laurence being not bloody is equivalent to Hunter being not fine.
If someone is ancient, then he is not fine.
If someone is not fine, then he is not annoyed, and vice versa.
Someone being both sincere and not annoyed is equivalent to being bloody and not blue-eyed.
If there is someone who is not ancient, then Kimberly is not fine.
It can be concluded that Hunter is blue-eyed and Coleman is not fine once knowing that Sophie is bloody.
If Laurence is fine, then Kimberly is sincere and Laurence is not bloody, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Sophie is bloody and Marlin is annoyed once knowing that Kimberly is not ancient and Hunter is fine.
If there is at least one people who is blue-eyed, then Kimberly is not ancient and Laurence is bloody. | Hunter is sincere. | neutral |
Hunter is not fine.
Coleman is not bloody.
Coleman is fine.
Melody is not blue-eyed.
Melody is not annoyed.
Melody is not sincere.
Melody is not ancient.
Melody is not fine.
Coleman is not ancient.
Kimberly is ancient.
Kimberly is annoyed.
Hunter is blue-eyed.If Kimberly is not blue-eyed and Laurence is fine, then Sophie is bloody and Melody is annoyed, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is annoyed or ancient, then Sophie is sincere.
Someone who is eithor fine or not bloody is always ancient.
Laurence being not bloody is equivalent to Hunter being not fine.
If someone is ancient, then he is not fine.
If someone is not fine, then he is not annoyed, and vice versa.
Someone being both sincere and not annoyed is equivalent to being bloody and not blue-eyed.
If there is someone who is not ancient, then Kimberly is not fine.
It can be concluded that Hunter is blue-eyed and Coleman is not fine once knowing that Sophie is bloody.
If Laurence is fine, then Kimberly is sincere and Laurence is not bloody, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Sophie is bloody and Marlin is annoyed once knowing that Kimberly is not ancient and Hunter is fine.
If there is at least one people who is blue-eyed, then Kimberly is not ancient and Laurence is bloody. | Hunter is fine. | contradiction |
Hunter is not fine.
Coleman is not bloody.
Coleman is fine.
Melody is not blue-eyed.
Melody is not annoyed.
Melody is not sincere.
Melody is not ancient.
Melody is not fine.
Coleman is not ancient.
Kimberly is ancient.
Kimberly is annoyed.
Hunter is blue-eyed.If Kimberly is not blue-eyed and Laurence is fine, then Sophie is bloody and Melody is annoyed, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is annoyed or ancient, then Sophie is sincere.
Someone who is eithor fine or not bloody is always ancient.
Laurence being not bloody is equivalent to Hunter being not fine.
If someone is ancient, then he is not fine.
If someone is not fine, then he is not annoyed, and vice versa.
Someone being both sincere and not annoyed is equivalent to being bloody and not blue-eyed.
If there is someone who is not ancient, then Kimberly is not fine.
It can be concluded that Hunter is blue-eyed and Coleman is not fine once knowing that Sophie is bloody.
If Laurence is fine, then Kimberly is sincere and Laurence is not bloody, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Sophie is bloody and Marlin is annoyed once knowing that Kimberly is not ancient and Hunter is fine.
If there is at least one people who is blue-eyed, then Kimberly is not ancient and Laurence is bloody. | Sophie is not sincere. | contradiction |
Hunter is not fine.
Coleman is not bloody.
Coleman is fine.
Melody is not blue-eyed.
Melody is not annoyed.
Melody is not sincere.
Melody is not ancient.
Melody is not fine.
Coleman is not ancient.
Kimberly is ancient.
Kimberly is annoyed.
Hunter is blue-eyed.If Kimberly is not blue-eyed and Laurence is fine, then Sophie is bloody and Melody is annoyed, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is annoyed or ancient, then Sophie is sincere.
Someone who is eithor fine or not bloody is always ancient.
Laurence being not bloody is equivalent to Hunter being not fine.
If someone is ancient, then he is not fine.
If someone is not fine, then he is not annoyed, and vice versa.
Someone being both sincere and not annoyed is equivalent to being bloody and not blue-eyed.
If there is someone who is not ancient, then Kimberly is not fine.
It can be concluded that Hunter is blue-eyed and Coleman is not fine once knowing that Sophie is bloody.
If Laurence is fine, then Kimberly is sincere and Laurence is not bloody, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Sophie is bloody and Marlin is annoyed once knowing that Kimberly is not ancient and Hunter is fine.
If there is at least one people who is blue-eyed, then Kimberly is not ancient and Laurence is bloody. | Marlin is bloody. | neutral |
Hunter is not fine.
Coleman is not bloody.
Coleman is fine.
Melody is not blue-eyed.
Melody is not annoyed.
Melody is not sincere.
Melody is not ancient.
Melody is not fine.
Coleman is not ancient.
Kimberly is ancient.
Kimberly is annoyed.
Hunter is blue-eyed.If Kimberly is not blue-eyed and Laurence is fine, then Sophie is bloody and Melody is annoyed, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is annoyed or ancient, then Sophie is sincere.
Someone who is eithor fine or not bloody is always ancient.
Laurence being not bloody is equivalent to Hunter being not fine.
If someone is ancient, then he is not fine.
If someone is not fine, then he is not annoyed, and vice versa.
Someone being both sincere and not annoyed is equivalent to being bloody and not blue-eyed.
If there is someone who is not ancient, then Kimberly is not fine.
It can be concluded that Hunter is blue-eyed and Coleman is not fine once knowing that Sophie is bloody.
If Laurence is fine, then Kimberly is sincere and Laurence is not bloody, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Sophie is bloody and Marlin is annoyed once knowing that Kimberly is not ancient and Hunter is fine.
If there is at least one people who is blue-eyed, then Kimberly is not ancient and Laurence is bloody. | Marlin is sincere. | neutral |
Hunter is not fine.
Coleman is not bloody.
Coleman is fine.
Melody is not blue-eyed.
Melody is not annoyed.
Melody is not sincere.
Melody is not ancient.
Melody is not fine.
Coleman is not ancient.
Kimberly is ancient.
Kimberly is annoyed.
Hunter is blue-eyed.If Kimberly is not blue-eyed and Laurence is fine, then Sophie is bloody and Melody is annoyed, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is annoyed or ancient, then Sophie is sincere.
Someone who is eithor fine or not bloody is always ancient.
Laurence being not bloody is equivalent to Hunter being not fine.
If someone is ancient, then he is not fine.
If someone is not fine, then he is not annoyed, and vice versa.
Someone being both sincere and not annoyed is equivalent to being bloody and not blue-eyed.
If there is someone who is not ancient, then Kimberly is not fine.
It can be concluded that Hunter is blue-eyed and Coleman is not fine once knowing that Sophie is bloody.
If Laurence is fine, then Kimberly is sincere and Laurence is not bloody, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Sophie is bloody and Marlin is annoyed once knowing that Kimberly is not ancient and Hunter is fine.
If there is at least one people who is blue-eyed, then Kimberly is not ancient and Laurence is bloody. | Laurence is not fine. | entailment |
Hunter is not fine.
Coleman is not bloody.
Coleman is fine.
Melody is not blue-eyed.
Melody is not annoyed.
Melody is not sincere.
Melody is not ancient.
Melody is not fine.
Coleman is not ancient.
Kimberly is ancient.
Kimberly is annoyed.
Hunter is blue-eyed.If Kimberly is not blue-eyed and Laurence is fine, then Sophie is bloody and Melody is annoyed, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is annoyed or ancient, then Sophie is sincere.
Someone who is eithor fine or not bloody is always ancient.
Laurence being not bloody is equivalent to Hunter being not fine.
If someone is ancient, then he is not fine.
If someone is not fine, then he is not annoyed, and vice versa.
Someone being both sincere and not annoyed is equivalent to being bloody and not blue-eyed.
If there is someone who is not ancient, then Kimberly is not fine.
It can be concluded that Hunter is blue-eyed and Coleman is not fine once knowing that Sophie is bloody.
If Laurence is fine, then Kimberly is sincere and Laurence is not bloody, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Sophie is bloody and Marlin is annoyed once knowing that Kimberly is not ancient and Hunter is fine.
If there is at least one people who is blue-eyed, then Kimberly is not ancient and Laurence is bloody. | Coleman is not bloody. | entailment |
Hunter is not fine.
Coleman is not bloody.
Coleman is fine.
Melody is not blue-eyed.
Melody is not annoyed.
Melody is not sincere.
Melody is not ancient.
Melody is not fine.
Coleman is not ancient.
Kimberly is ancient.
Kimberly is annoyed.
Hunter is blue-eyed.If Kimberly is not blue-eyed and Laurence is fine, then Sophie is bloody and Melody is annoyed, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is annoyed or ancient, then Sophie is sincere.
Someone who is eithor fine or not bloody is always ancient.
Laurence being not bloody is equivalent to Hunter being not fine.
If someone is ancient, then he is not fine.
If someone is not fine, then he is not annoyed, and vice versa.
Someone being both sincere and not annoyed is equivalent to being bloody and not blue-eyed.
If there is someone who is not ancient, then Kimberly is not fine.
It can be concluded that Hunter is blue-eyed and Coleman is not fine once knowing that Sophie is bloody.
If Laurence is fine, then Kimberly is sincere and Laurence is not bloody, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Sophie is bloody and Marlin is annoyed once knowing that Kimberly is not ancient and Hunter is fine.
If there is at least one people who is blue-eyed, then Kimberly is not ancient and Laurence is bloody. | Coleman is not fine. | self_contradiction |
Hunter is not fine.
Coleman is not bloody.
Coleman is fine.
Melody is not blue-eyed.
Melody is not annoyed.
Melody is not sincere.
Melody is not ancient.
Melody is not fine.
Coleman is not ancient.
Kimberly is ancient.
Kimberly is annoyed.
Hunter is blue-eyed.If Kimberly is not blue-eyed and Laurence is fine, then Sophie is bloody and Melody is annoyed, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is annoyed or ancient, then Sophie is sincere.
Someone who is eithor fine or not bloody is always ancient.
Laurence being not bloody is equivalent to Hunter being not fine.
If someone is ancient, then he is not fine.
If someone is not fine, then he is not annoyed, and vice versa.
Someone being both sincere and not annoyed is equivalent to being bloody and not blue-eyed.
If there is someone who is not ancient, then Kimberly is not fine.
It can be concluded that Hunter is blue-eyed and Coleman is not fine once knowing that Sophie is bloody.
If Laurence is fine, then Kimberly is sincere and Laurence is not bloody, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Sophie is bloody and Marlin is annoyed once knowing that Kimberly is not ancient and Hunter is fine.
If there is at least one people who is blue-eyed, then Kimberly is not ancient and Laurence is bloody. | Hunter is blue-eyed. | entailment |
Hunter is not fine.
Coleman is not bloody.
Coleman is fine.
Melody is not blue-eyed.
Melody is not annoyed.
Melody is not sincere.
Melody is not ancient.
Melody is not fine.
Coleman is not ancient.
Kimberly is ancient.
Kimberly is annoyed.
Hunter is blue-eyed.If Kimberly is not blue-eyed and Laurence is fine, then Sophie is bloody and Melody is annoyed, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is annoyed or ancient, then Sophie is sincere.
Someone who is eithor fine or not bloody is always ancient.
Laurence being not bloody is equivalent to Hunter being not fine.
If someone is ancient, then he is not fine.
If someone is not fine, then he is not annoyed, and vice versa.
Someone being both sincere and not annoyed is equivalent to being bloody and not blue-eyed.
If there is someone who is not ancient, then Kimberly is not fine.
It can be concluded that Hunter is blue-eyed and Coleman is not fine once knowing that Sophie is bloody.
If Laurence is fine, then Kimberly is sincere and Laurence is not bloody, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Sophie is bloody and Marlin is annoyed once knowing that Kimberly is not ancient and Hunter is fine.
If there is at least one people who is blue-eyed, then Kimberly is not ancient and Laurence is bloody. | Melody is not sincere. | entailment |
Hunter is not fine.
Coleman is not bloody.
Coleman is fine.
Melody is not blue-eyed.
Melody is not annoyed.
Melody is not sincere.
Melody is not ancient.
Melody is not fine.
Coleman is not ancient.
Kimberly is ancient.
Kimberly is annoyed.
Hunter is blue-eyed.If Kimberly is not blue-eyed and Laurence is fine, then Sophie is bloody and Melody is annoyed, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is annoyed or ancient, then Sophie is sincere.
Someone who is eithor fine or not bloody is always ancient.
Laurence being not bloody is equivalent to Hunter being not fine.
If someone is ancient, then he is not fine.
If someone is not fine, then he is not annoyed, and vice versa.
Someone being both sincere and not annoyed is equivalent to being bloody and not blue-eyed.
If there is someone who is not ancient, then Kimberly is not fine.
It can be concluded that Hunter is blue-eyed and Coleman is not fine once knowing that Sophie is bloody.
If Laurence is fine, then Kimberly is sincere and Laurence is not bloody, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Sophie is bloody and Marlin is annoyed once knowing that Kimberly is not ancient and Hunter is fine.
If there is at least one people who is blue-eyed, then Kimberly is not ancient and Laurence is bloody. | Kimberly is annoyed. | self_contradiction |
Hunter is not fine.
Coleman is not bloody.
Coleman is fine.
Melody is not blue-eyed.
Melody is not annoyed.
Melody is not sincere.
Melody is not ancient.
Melody is not fine.
Coleman is not ancient.
Kimberly is ancient.
Kimberly is annoyed.
Hunter is blue-eyed.If Kimberly is not blue-eyed and Laurence is fine, then Sophie is bloody and Melody is annoyed, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is annoyed or ancient, then Sophie is sincere.
Someone who is eithor fine or not bloody is always ancient.
Laurence being not bloody is equivalent to Hunter being not fine.
If someone is ancient, then he is not fine.
If someone is not fine, then he is not annoyed, and vice versa.
Someone being both sincere and not annoyed is equivalent to being bloody and not blue-eyed.
If there is someone who is not ancient, then Kimberly is not fine.
It can be concluded that Hunter is blue-eyed and Coleman is not fine once knowing that Sophie is bloody.
If Laurence is fine, then Kimberly is sincere and Laurence is not bloody, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Sophie is bloody and Marlin is annoyed once knowing that Kimberly is not ancient and Hunter is fine.
If there is at least one people who is blue-eyed, then Kimberly is not ancient and Laurence is bloody. | Coleman is annoyed. | contradiction |
Hunter is not fine.
Coleman is not bloody.
Coleman is fine.
Melody is not blue-eyed.
Melody is not annoyed.
Melody is not sincere.
Melody is not ancient.
Melody is not fine.
Coleman is not ancient.
Kimberly is ancient.
Kimberly is annoyed.
Hunter is blue-eyed.If Kimberly is not blue-eyed and Laurence is fine, then Sophie is bloody and Melody is annoyed, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is annoyed or ancient, then Sophie is sincere.
Someone who is eithor fine or not bloody is always ancient.
Laurence being not bloody is equivalent to Hunter being not fine.
If someone is ancient, then he is not fine.
If someone is not fine, then he is not annoyed, and vice versa.
Someone being both sincere and not annoyed is equivalent to being bloody and not blue-eyed.
If there is someone who is not ancient, then Kimberly is not fine.
It can be concluded that Hunter is blue-eyed and Coleman is not fine once knowing that Sophie is bloody.
If Laurence is fine, then Kimberly is sincere and Laurence is not bloody, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Sophie is bloody and Marlin is annoyed once knowing that Kimberly is not ancient and Hunter is fine.
If there is at least one people who is blue-eyed, then Kimberly is not ancient and Laurence is bloody. | Kimberly is not ancient. | self_contradiction |
Hunter is not fine.
Coleman is not bloody.
Coleman is fine.
Melody is not blue-eyed.
Melody is not annoyed.
Melody is not sincere.
Melody is not ancient.
Melody is not fine.
Coleman is not ancient.
Kimberly is ancient.
Kimberly is annoyed.
Hunter is blue-eyed.If Kimberly is not blue-eyed and Laurence is fine, then Sophie is bloody and Melody is annoyed, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is annoyed or ancient, then Sophie is sincere.
Someone who is eithor fine or not bloody is always ancient.
Laurence being not bloody is equivalent to Hunter being not fine.
If someone is ancient, then he is not fine.
If someone is not fine, then he is not annoyed, and vice versa.
Someone being both sincere and not annoyed is equivalent to being bloody and not blue-eyed.
If there is someone who is not ancient, then Kimberly is not fine.
It can be concluded that Hunter is blue-eyed and Coleman is not fine once knowing that Sophie is bloody.
If Laurence is fine, then Kimberly is sincere and Laurence is not bloody, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Sophie is bloody and Marlin is annoyed once knowing that Kimberly is not ancient and Hunter is fine.
If there is at least one people who is blue-eyed, then Kimberly is not ancient and Laurence is bloody. | Coleman is fine. | self_contradiction |
Hunter is not fine.
Coleman is not bloody.
Coleman is fine.
Melody is not blue-eyed.
Melody is not annoyed.
Melody is not sincere.
Melody is not ancient.
Melody is not fine.
Coleman is not ancient.
Kimberly is ancient.
Kimberly is annoyed.
Hunter is blue-eyed.If Kimberly is not blue-eyed and Laurence is fine, then Sophie is bloody and Melody is annoyed, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is annoyed or ancient, then Sophie is sincere.
Someone who is eithor fine or not bloody is always ancient.
Laurence being not bloody is equivalent to Hunter being not fine.
If someone is ancient, then he is not fine.
If someone is not fine, then he is not annoyed, and vice versa.
Someone being both sincere and not annoyed is equivalent to being bloody and not blue-eyed.
If there is someone who is not ancient, then Kimberly is not fine.
It can be concluded that Hunter is blue-eyed and Coleman is not fine once knowing that Sophie is bloody.
If Laurence is fine, then Kimberly is sincere and Laurence is not bloody, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Sophie is bloody and Marlin is annoyed once knowing that Kimberly is not ancient and Hunter is fine.
If there is at least one people who is blue-eyed, then Kimberly is not ancient and Laurence is bloody. | Coleman is not blue-eyed. | neutral |
Hunter is not fine.
Coleman is not bloody.
Coleman is fine.
Melody is not blue-eyed.
Melody is not annoyed.
Melody is not sincere.
Melody is not ancient.
Melody is not fine.
Coleman is not ancient.
Kimberly is ancient.
Kimberly is annoyed.
Hunter is blue-eyed.If Kimberly is not blue-eyed and Laurence is fine, then Sophie is bloody and Melody is annoyed, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is annoyed or ancient, then Sophie is sincere.
Someone who is eithor fine or not bloody is always ancient.
Laurence being not bloody is equivalent to Hunter being not fine.
If someone is ancient, then he is not fine.
If someone is not fine, then he is not annoyed, and vice versa.
Someone being both sincere and not annoyed is equivalent to being bloody and not blue-eyed.
If there is someone who is not ancient, then Kimberly is not fine.
It can be concluded that Hunter is blue-eyed and Coleman is not fine once knowing that Sophie is bloody.
If Laurence is fine, then Kimberly is sincere and Laurence is not bloody, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Sophie is bloody and Marlin is annoyed once knowing that Kimberly is not ancient and Hunter is fine.
If there is at least one people who is blue-eyed, then Kimberly is not ancient and Laurence is bloody. | Coleman is ancient. | self_contradiction |
Hunter is not fine.
Coleman is not bloody.
Coleman is fine.
Melody is not blue-eyed.
Melody is not annoyed.
Melody is not sincere.
Melody is not ancient.
Melody is not fine.
Coleman is not ancient.
Kimberly is ancient.
Kimberly is annoyed.
Hunter is blue-eyed.If Kimberly is not blue-eyed and Laurence is fine, then Sophie is bloody and Melody is annoyed, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is annoyed or ancient, then Sophie is sincere.
Someone who is eithor fine or not bloody is always ancient.
Laurence being not bloody is equivalent to Hunter being not fine.
If someone is ancient, then he is not fine.
If someone is not fine, then he is not annoyed, and vice versa.
Someone being both sincere and not annoyed is equivalent to being bloody and not blue-eyed.
If there is someone who is not ancient, then Kimberly is not fine.
It can be concluded that Hunter is blue-eyed and Coleman is not fine once knowing that Sophie is bloody.
If Laurence is fine, then Kimberly is sincere and Laurence is not bloody, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Sophie is bloody and Marlin is annoyed once knowing that Kimberly is not ancient and Hunter is fine.
If there is at least one people who is blue-eyed, then Kimberly is not ancient and Laurence is bloody. | Coleman is bloody. | contradiction |
Hunter is not fine.
Coleman is not bloody.
Coleman is fine.
Melody is not blue-eyed.
Melody is not annoyed.
Melody is not sincere.
Melody is not ancient.
Melody is not fine.
Coleman is not ancient.
Kimberly is ancient.
Kimberly is annoyed.
Hunter is blue-eyed.If Kimberly is not blue-eyed and Laurence is fine, then Sophie is bloody and Melody is annoyed, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is annoyed or ancient, then Sophie is sincere.
Someone who is eithor fine or not bloody is always ancient.
Laurence being not bloody is equivalent to Hunter being not fine.
If someone is ancient, then he is not fine.
If someone is not fine, then he is not annoyed, and vice versa.
Someone being both sincere and not annoyed is equivalent to being bloody and not blue-eyed.
If there is someone who is not ancient, then Kimberly is not fine.
It can be concluded that Hunter is blue-eyed and Coleman is not fine once knowing that Sophie is bloody.
If Laurence is fine, then Kimberly is sincere and Laurence is not bloody, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Sophie is bloody and Marlin is annoyed once knowing that Kimberly is not ancient and Hunter is fine.
If there is at least one people who is blue-eyed, then Kimberly is not ancient and Laurence is bloody. | Marlin is not bloody. | neutral |
Hunter is not fine.
Coleman is not bloody.
Coleman is fine.
Melody is not blue-eyed.
Melody is not annoyed.
Melody is not sincere.
Melody is not ancient.
Melody is not fine.
Coleman is not ancient.
Kimberly is ancient.
Kimberly is annoyed.
Hunter is blue-eyed.If Kimberly is not blue-eyed and Laurence is fine, then Sophie is bloody and Melody is annoyed, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is annoyed or ancient, then Sophie is sincere.
Someone who is eithor fine or not bloody is always ancient.
Laurence being not bloody is equivalent to Hunter being not fine.
If someone is ancient, then he is not fine.
If someone is not fine, then he is not annoyed, and vice versa.
Someone being both sincere and not annoyed is equivalent to being bloody and not blue-eyed.
If there is someone who is not ancient, then Kimberly is not fine.
It can be concluded that Hunter is blue-eyed and Coleman is not fine once knowing that Sophie is bloody.
If Laurence is fine, then Kimberly is sincere and Laurence is not bloody, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Sophie is bloody and Marlin is annoyed once knowing that Kimberly is not ancient and Hunter is fine.
If there is at least one people who is blue-eyed, then Kimberly is not ancient and Laurence is bloody. | Coleman is not annoyed. | entailment |
Hunter is not fine.
Coleman is not bloody.
Coleman is fine.
Melody is not blue-eyed.
Melody is not annoyed.
Melody is not sincere.
Melody is not ancient.
Melody is not fine.
Coleman is not ancient.
Kimberly is ancient.
Kimberly is annoyed.
Hunter is blue-eyed.If Kimberly is not blue-eyed and Laurence is fine, then Sophie is bloody and Melody is annoyed, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is annoyed or ancient, then Sophie is sincere.
Someone who is eithor fine or not bloody is always ancient.
Laurence being not bloody is equivalent to Hunter being not fine.
If someone is ancient, then he is not fine.
If someone is not fine, then he is not annoyed, and vice versa.
Someone being both sincere and not annoyed is equivalent to being bloody and not blue-eyed.
If there is someone who is not ancient, then Kimberly is not fine.
It can be concluded that Hunter is blue-eyed and Coleman is not fine once knowing that Sophie is bloody.
If Laurence is fine, then Kimberly is sincere and Laurence is not bloody, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Sophie is bloody and Marlin is annoyed once knowing that Kimberly is not ancient and Hunter is fine.
If there is at least one people who is blue-eyed, then Kimberly is not ancient and Laurence is bloody. | Laurence is not ancient. | contradiction |
Nicholas is not cold.
Boris is aggressive.
Cadman is suitable.
Nicholas is aggressive.
Cadman is inner.
Ross is not psychological.
Gloria is not inner.
Justin is inner.
Gloria is self-confident.
Hall is not cold.
Cadman is cold.
Justin is self-confident.Someone is not cold if and only if he is not inner.
Someone is self-confident and aggressive if and only if he is not inner.
As long as someone is either inner or self-confident, he is not cold and not suitable.
Someone who is both not cold and not psychological is always suitable.
Cadman is psychological if and only if Justin is suitable and Ross is not cold.
If someone is suitable, then he is not psychological, and vice versa.
If Justin is psychological and Nicholas is inner, then Justin is self-confident.
If someone who is not suitable is also cold, then he is not inner.
If someone who is not psychological is also not aggressive, then he is self-confident.
If there is at least one people who is self-confident, then Nicholas is not aggressive.
If there is someone who is both not psychological and cold, then Cadman is aggressive.
Someone who is both inner and not aggressive is always psychological. | Cadman is not psychological. | entailment |
Nicholas is not cold.
Boris is aggressive.
Cadman is suitable.
Nicholas is aggressive.
Cadman is inner.
Ross is not psychological.
Gloria is not inner.
Justin is inner.
Gloria is self-confident.
Hall is not cold.
Cadman is cold.
Justin is self-confident.Someone is not cold if and only if he is not inner.
Someone is self-confident and aggressive if and only if he is not inner.
As long as someone is either inner or self-confident, he is not cold and not suitable.
Someone who is both not cold and not psychological is always suitable.
Cadman is psychological if and only if Justin is suitable and Ross is not cold.
If someone is suitable, then he is not psychological, and vice versa.
If Justin is psychological and Nicholas is inner, then Justin is self-confident.
If someone who is not suitable is also cold, then he is not inner.
If someone who is not psychological is also not aggressive, then he is self-confident.
If there is at least one people who is self-confident, then Nicholas is not aggressive.
If there is someone who is both not psychological and cold, then Cadman is aggressive.
Someone who is both inner and not aggressive is always psychological. | Nicholas is self-confident. | entailment |
Nicholas is not cold.
Boris is aggressive.
Cadman is suitable.
Nicholas is aggressive.
Cadman is inner.
Ross is not psychological.
Gloria is not inner.
Justin is inner.
Gloria is self-confident.
Hall is not cold.
Cadman is cold.
Justin is self-confident.Someone is not cold if and only if he is not inner.
Someone is self-confident and aggressive if and only if he is not inner.
As long as someone is either inner or self-confident, he is not cold and not suitable.
Someone who is both not cold and not psychological is always suitable.
Cadman is psychological if and only if Justin is suitable and Ross is not cold.
If someone is suitable, then he is not psychological, and vice versa.
If Justin is psychological and Nicholas is inner, then Justin is self-confident.
If someone who is not suitable is also cold, then he is not inner.
If someone who is not psychological is also not aggressive, then he is self-confident.
If there is at least one people who is self-confident, then Nicholas is not aggressive.
If there is someone who is both not psychological and cold, then Cadman is aggressive.
Someone who is both inner and not aggressive is always psychological. | Justin is not inner. | self_contradiction |
Nicholas is not cold.
Boris is aggressive.
Cadman is suitable.
Nicholas is aggressive.
Cadman is inner.
Ross is not psychological.
Gloria is not inner.
Justin is inner.
Gloria is self-confident.
Hall is not cold.
Cadman is cold.
Justin is self-confident.Someone is not cold if and only if he is not inner.
Someone is self-confident and aggressive if and only if he is not inner.
As long as someone is either inner or self-confident, he is not cold and not suitable.
Someone who is both not cold and not psychological is always suitable.
Cadman is psychological if and only if Justin is suitable and Ross is not cold.
If someone is suitable, then he is not psychological, and vice versa.
If Justin is psychological and Nicholas is inner, then Justin is self-confident.
If someone who is not suitable is also cold, then he is not inner.
If someone who is not psychological is also not aggressive, then he is self-confident.
If there is at least one people who is self-confident, then Nicholas is not aggressive.
If there is someone who is both not psychological and cold, then Cadman is aggressive.
Someone who is both inner and not aggressive is always psychological. | Hall is cold. | contradiction |
Nicholas is not cold.
Boris is aggressive.
Cadman is suitable.
Nicholas is aggressive.
Cadman is inner.
Ross is not psychological.
Gloria is not inner.
Justin is inner.
Gloria is self-confident.
Hall is not cold.
Cadman is cold.
Justin is self-confident.Someone is not cold if and only if he is not inner.
Someone is self-confident and aggressive if and only if he is not inner.
As long as someone is either inner or self-confident, he is not cold and not suitable.
Someone who is both not cold and not psychological is always suitable.
Cadman is psychological if and only if Justin is suitable and Ross is not cold.
If someone is suitable, then he is not psychological, and vice versa.
If Justin is psychological and Nicholas is inner, then Justin is self-confident.
If someone who is not suitable is also cold, then he is not inner.
If someone who is not psychological is also not aggressive, then he is self-confident.
If there is at least one people who is self-confident, then Nicholas is not aggressive.
If there is someone who is both not psychological and cold, then Cadman is aggressive.
Someone who is both inner and not aggressive is always psychological. | Gloria is not cold. | entailment |
Nicholas is not cold.
Boris is aggressive.
Cadman is suitable.
Nicholas is aggressive.
Cadman is inner.
Ross is not psychological.
Gloria is not inner.
Justin is inner.
Gloria is self-confident.
Hall is not cold.
Cadman is cold.
Justin is self-confident.Someone is not cold if and only if he is not inner.
Someone is self-confident and aggressive if and only if he is not inner.
As long as someone is either inner or self-confident, he is not cold and not suitable.
Someone who is both not cold and not psychological is always suitable.
Cadman is psychological if and only if Justin is suitable and Ross is not cold.
If someone is suitable, then he is not psychological, and vice versa.
If Justin is psychological and Nicholas is inner, then Justin is self-confident.
If someone who is not suitable is also cold, then he is not inner.
If someone who is not psychological is also not aggressive, then he is self-confident.
If there is at least one people who is self-confident, then Nicholas is not aggressive.
If there is someone who is both not psychological and cold, then Cadman is aggressive.
Someone who is both inner and not aggressive is always psychological. | Cadman is cold. | self_contradiction |
Nicholas is not cold.
Boris is aggressive.
Cadman is suitable.
Nicholas is aggressive.
Cadman is inner.
Ross is not psychological.
Gloria is not inner.
Justin is inner.
Gloria is self-confident.
Hall is not cold.
Cadman is cold.
Justin is self-confident.Someone is not cold if and only if he is not inner.
Someone is self-confident and aggressive if and only if he is not inner.
As long as someone is either inner or self-confident, he is not cold and not suitable.
Someone who is both not cold and not psychological is always suitable.
Cadman is psychological if and only if Justin is suitable and Ross is not cold.
If someone is suitable, then he is not psychological, and vice versa.
If Justin is psychological and Nicholas is inner, then Justin is self-confident.
If someone who is not suitable is also cold, then he is not inner.
If someone who is not psychological is also not aggressive, then he is self-confident.
If there is at least one people who is self-confident, then Nicholas is not aggressive.
If there is someone who is both not psychological and cold, then Cadman is aggressive.
Someone who is both inner and not aggressive is always psychological. | Cadman is inner. | self_contradiction |
Nicholas is not cold.
Boris is aggressive.
Cadman is suitable.
Nicholas is aggressive.
Cadman is inner.
Ross is not psychological.
Gloria is not inner.
Justin is inner.
Gloria is self-confident.
Hall is not cold.
Cadman is cold.
Justin is self-confident.Someone is not cold if and only if he is not inner.
Someone is self-confident and aggressive if and only if he is not inner.
As long as someone is either inner or self-confident, he is not cold and not suitable.
Someone who is both not cold and not psychological is always suitable.
Cadman is psychological if and only if Justin is suitable and Ross is not cold.
If someone is suitable, then he is not psychological, and vice versa.
If Justin is psychological and Nicholas is inner, then Justin is self-confident.
If someone who is not suitable is also cold, then he is not inner.
If someone who is not psychological is also not aggressive, then he is self-confident.
If there is at least one people who is self-confident, then Nicholas is not aggressive.
If there is someone who is both not psychological and cold, then Cadman is aggressive.
Someone who is both inner and not aggressive is always psychological. | Nicholas is not psychological. | neutral |
Nicholas is not cold.
Boris is aggressive.
Cadman is suitable.
Nicholas is aggressive.
Cadman is inner.
Ross is not psychological.
Gloria is not inner.
Justin is inner.
Gloria is self-confident.
Hall is not cold.
Cadman is cold.
Justin is self-confident.Someone is not cold if and only if he is not inner.
Someone is self-confident and aggressive if and only if he is not inner.
As long as someone is either inner or self-confident, he is not cold and not suitable.
Someone who is both not cold and not psychological is always suitable.
Cadman is psychological if and only if Justin is suitable and Ross is not cold.
If someone is suitable, then he is not psychological, and vice versa.
If Justin is psychological and Nicholas is inner, then Justin is self-confident.
If someone who is not suitable is also cold, then he is not inner.
If someone who is not psychological is also not aggressive, then he is self-confident.
If there is at least one people who is self-confident, then Nicholas is not aggressive.
If there is someone who is both not psychological and cold, then Cadman is aggressive.
Someone who is both inner and not aggressive is always psychological. | Boris is inner. | neutral |
Nicholas is not cold.
Boris is aggressive.
Cadman is suitable.
Nicholas is aggressive.
Cadman is inner.
Ross is not psychological.
Gloria is not inner.
Justin is inner.
Gloria is self-confident.
Hall is not cold.
Cadman is cold.
Justin is self-confident.Someone is not cold if and only if he is not inner.
Someone is self-confident and aggressive if and only if he is not inner.
As long as someone is either inner or self-confident, he is not cold and not suitable.
Someone who is both not cold and not psychological is always suitable.
Cadman is psychological if and only if Justin is suitable and Ross is not cold.
If someone is suitable, then he is not psychological, and vice versa.
If Justin is psychological and Nicholas is inner, then Justin is self-confident.
If someone who is not suitable is also cold, then he is not inner.
If someone who is not psychological is also not aggressive, then he is self-confident.
If there is at least one people who is self-confident, then Nicholas is not aggressive.
If there is someone who is both not psychological and cold, then Cadman is aggressive.
Someone who is both inner and not aggressive is always psychological. | Hall is inner. | contradiction |
Nicholas is not cold.
Boris is aggressive.
Cadman is suitable.
Nicholas is aggressive.
Cadman is inner.
Ross is not psychological.
Gloria is not inner.
Justin is inner.
Gloria is self-confident.
Hall is not cold.
Cadman is cold.
Justin is self-confident.Someone is not cold if and only if he is not inner.
Someone is self-confident and aggressive if and only if he is not inner.
As long as someone is either inner or self-confident, he is not cold and not suitable.
Someone who is both not cold and not psychological is always suitable.
Cadman is psychological if and only if Justin is suitable and Ross is not cold.
If someone is suitable, then he is not psychological, and vice versa.
If Justin is psychological and Nicholas is inner, then Justin is self-confident.
If someone who is not suitable is also cold, then he is not inner.
If someone who is not psychological is also not aggressive, then he is self-confident.
If there is at least one people who is self-confident, then Nicholas is not aggressive.
If there is someone who is both not psychological and cold, then Cadman is aggressive.
Someone who is both inner and not aggressive is always psychological. | Hall is not aggressive. | contradiction |
Nicholas is not cold.
Boris is aggressive.
Cadman is suitable.
Nicholas is aggressive.
Cadman is inner.
Ross is not psychological.
Gloria is not inner.
Justin is inner.
Gloria is self-confident.
Hall is not cold.
Cadman is cold.
Justin is self-confident.Someone is not cold if and only if he is not inner.
Someone is self-confident and aggressive if and only if he is not inner.
As long as someone is either inner or self-confident, he is not cold and not suitable.
Someone who is both not cold and not psychological is always suitable.
Cadman is psychological if and only if Justin is suitable and Ross is not cold.
If someone is suitable, then he is not psychological, and vice versa.
If Justin is psychological and Nicholas is inner, then Justin is self-confident.
If someone who is not suitable is also cold, then he is not inner.
If someone who is not psychological is also not aggressive, then he is self-confident.
If there is at least one people who is self-confident, then Nicholas is not aggressive.
If there is someone who is both not psychological and cold, then Cadman is aggressive.
Someone who is both inner and not aggressive is always psychological. | Justin is inner. | self_contradiction |
Nicholas is not cold.
Boris is aggressive.
Cadman is suitable.
Nicholas is aggressive.
Cadman is inner.
Ross is not psychological.
Gloria is not inner.
Justin is inner.
Gloria is self-confident.
Hall is not cold.
Cadman is cold.
Justin is self-confident.Someone is not cold if and only if he is not inner.
Someone is self-confident and aggressive if and only if he is not inner.
As long as someone is either inner or self-confident, he is not cold and not suitable.
Someone who is both not cold and not psychological is always suitable.
Cadman is psychological if and only if Justin is suitable and Ross is not cold.
If someone is suitable, then he is not psychological, and vice versa.
If Justin is psychological and Nicholas is inner, then Justin is self-confident.
If someone who is not suitable is also cold, then he is not inner.
If someone who is not psychological is also not aggressive, then he is self-confident.
If there is at least one people who is self-confident, then Nicholas is not aggressive.
If there is someone who is both not psychological and cold, then Cadman is aggressive.
Someone who is both inner and not aggressive is always psychological. | Nicholas is inner. | contradiction |
Nicholas is not cold.
Boris is aggressive.
Cadman is suitable.
Nicholas is aggressive.
Cadman is inner.
Ross is not psychological.
Gloria is not inner.
Justin is inner.
Gloria is self-confident.
Hall is not cold.
Cadman is cold.
Justin is self-confident.Someone is not cold if and only if he is not inner.
Someone is self-confident and aggressive if and only if he is not inner.
As long as someone is either inner or self-confident, he is not cold and not suitable.
Someone who is both not cold and not psychological is always suitable.
Cadman is psychological if and only if Justin is suitable and Ross is not cold.
If someone is suitable, then he is not psychological, and vice versa.
If Justin is psychological and Nicholas is inner, then Justin is self-confident.
If someone who is not suitable is also cold, then he is not inner.
If someone who is not psychological is also not aggressive, then he is self-confident.
If there is at least one people who is self-confident, then Nicholas is not aggressive.
If there is someone who is both not psychological and cold, then Cadman is aggressive.
Someone who is both inner and not aggressive is always psychological. | Nicholas is not inner. | entailment |
Nicholas is not cold.
Boris is aggressive.
Cadman is suitable.
Nicholas is aggressive.
Cadman is inner.
Ross is not psychological.
Gloria is not inner.
Justin is inner.
Gloria is self-confident.
Hall is not cold.
Cadman is cold.
Justin is self-confident.Someone is not cold if and only if he is not inner.
Someone is self-confident and aggressive if and only if he is not inner.
As long as someone is either inner or self-confident, he is not cold and not suitable.
Someone who is both not cold and not psychological is always suitable.
Cadman is psychological if and only if Justin is suitable and Ross is not cold.
If someone is suitable, then he is not psychological, and vice versa.
If Justin is psychological and Nicholas is inner, then Justin is self-confident.
If someone who is not suitable is also cold, then he is not inner.
If someone who is not psychological is also not aggressive, then he is self-confident.
If there is at least one people who is self-confident, then Nicholas is not aggressive.
If there is someone who is both not psychological and cold, then Cadman is aggressive.
Someone who is both inner and not aggressive is always psychological. | Ross is aggressive. | neutral |
Nicholas is not cold.
Boris is aggressive.
Cadman is suitable.
Nicholas is aggressive.
Cadman is inner.
Ross is not psychological.
Gloria is not inner.
Justin is inner.
Gloria is self-confident.
Hall is not cold.
Cadman is cold.
Justin is self-confident.Someone is not cold if and only if he is not inner.
Someone is self-confident and aggressive if and only if he is not inner.
As long as someone is either inner or self-confident, he is not cold and not suitable.
Someone who is both not cold and not psychological is always suitable.
Cadman is psychological if and only if Justin is suitable and Ross is not cold.
If someone is suitable, then he is not psychological, and vice versa.
If Justin is psychological and Nicholas is inner, then Justin is self-confident.
If someone who is not suitable is also cold, then he is not inner.
If someone who is not psychological is also not aggressive, then he is self-confident.
If there is at least one people who is self-confident, then Nicholas is not aggressive.
If there is someone who is both not psychological and cold, then Cadman is aggressive.
Someone who is both inner and not aggressive is always psychological. | Nicholas is psychological. | neutral |
Nicholas is not cold.
Boris is aggressive.
Cadman is suitable.
Nicholas is aggressive.
Cadman is inner.
Ross is not psychological.
Gloria is not inner.
Justin is inner.
Gloria is self-confident.
Hall is not cold.
Cadman is cold.
Justin is self-confident.Someone is not cold if and only if he is not inner.
Someone is self-confident and aggressive if and only if he is not inner.
As long as someone is either inner or self-confident, he is not cold and not suitable.
Someone who is both not cold and not psychological is always suitable.
Cadman is psychological if and only if Justin is suitable and Ross is not cold.
If someone is suitable, then he is not psychological, and vice versa.
If Justin is psychological and Nicholas is inner, then Justin is self-confident.
If someone who is not suitable is also cold, then he is not inner.
If someone who is not psychological is also not aggressive, then he is self-confident.
If there is at least one people who is self-confident, then Nicholas is not aggressive.
If there is someone who is both not psychological and cold, then Cadman is aggressive.
Someone who is both inner and not aggressive is always psychological. | Gloria is not self-confident. | contradiction |
Nicholas is not cold.
Boris is aggressive.
Cadman is suitable.
Nicholas is aggressive.
Cadman is inner.
Ross is not psychological.
Gloria is not inner.
Justin is inner.
Gloria is self-confident.
Hall is not cold.
Cadman is cold.
Justin is self-confident.Someone is not cold if and only if he is not inner.
Someone is self-confident and aggressive if and only if he is not inner.
As long as someone is either inner or self-confident, he is not cold and not suitable.
Someone who is both not cold and not psychological is always suitable.
Cadman is psychological if and only if Justin is suitable and Ross is not cold.
If someone is suitable, then he is not psychological, and vice versa.
If Justin is psychological and Nicholas is inner, then Justin is self-confident.
If someone who is not suitable is also cold, then he is not inner.
If someone who is not psychological is also not aggressive, then he is self-confident.
If there is at least one people who is self-confident, then Nicholas is not aggressive.
If there is someone who is both not psychological and cold, then Cadman is aggressive.
Someone who is both inner and not aggressive is always psychological. | Gloria is self-confident. | entailment |
Nicholas is not cold.
Boris is aggressive.
Cadman is suitable.
Nicholas is aggressive.
Cadman is inner.
Ross is not psychological.
Gloria is not inner.
Justin is inner.
Gloria is self-confident.
Hall is not cold.
Cadman is cold.
Justin is self-confident.Someone is not cold if and only if he is not inner.
Someone is self-confident and aggressive if and only if he is not inner.
As long as someone is either inner or self-confident, he is not cold and not suitable.
Someone who is both not cold and not psychological is always suitable.
Cadman is psychological if and only if Justin is suitable and Ross is not cold.
If someone is suitable, then he is not psychological, and vice versa.
If Justin is psychological and Nicholas is inner, then Justin is self-confident.
If someone who is not suitable is also cold, then he is not inner.
If someone who is not psychological is also not aggressive, then he is self-confident.
If there is at least one people who is self-confident, then Nicholas is not aggressive.
If there is someone who is both not psychological and cold, then Cadman is aggressive.
Someone who is both inner and not aggressive is always psychological. | Cadman is not suitable. | self_contradiction |
Nicholas is not cold.
Boris is aggressive.
Cadman is suitable.
Nicholas is aggressive.
Cadman is inner.
Ross is not psychological.
Gloria is not inner.
Justin is inner.
Gloria is self-confident.
Hall is not cold.
Cadman is cold.
Justin is self-confident.Someone is not cold if and only if he is not inner.
Someone is self-confident and aggressive if and only if he is not inner.
As long as someone is either inner or self-confident, he is not cold and not suitable.
Someone who is both not cold and not psychological is always suitable.
Cadman is psychological if and only if Justin is suitable and Ross is not cold.
If someone is suitable, then he is not psychological, and vice versa.
If Justin is psychological and Nicholas is inner, then Justin is self-confident.
If someone who is not suitable is also cold, then he is not inner.
If someone who is not psychological is also not aggressive, then he is self-confident.
If there is at least one people who is self-confident, then Nicholas is not aggressive.
If there is someone who is both not psychological and cold, then Cadman is aggressive.
Someone who is both inner and not aggressive is always psychological. | Boris is psychological. | neutral |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.