premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
---|---|---|
Quinlan is cautious.
Quinlan is not cute.
Jimmy is aggressive.
Arlen is red.
Todd is lively.
Traci is not odd.
Orlando is not aggressive.
Jimmy is red.
Dave is not cute.
Arlen is not odd.
Quinlan is not aggressive.
Arlen is aggressive.Traci is not red if and only if Arlen is aggressive and Arlen is odd.
If there is at least one people who is not cute or odd, then Quinlan is not aggressive.
If someone is red, then he is both lively and not cute.
If someone is red or he is aggressive, then he is lively.
As long as someone is cute, he is aggressive and not cautious.
Someone who is eithor red or cautious is always not aggressive.
Someone is not odd and not lively if and only if he is not cautious and not cute.
All lively people are not cautious.
If someone is both not odd and not cautious, then he is not lively.
If Arlen is odd or Dave is not cute, then Dave is not cautious.
Someone who is aggressive is always both not odd and not red.
If someone is red, then he is odd, and vice versa. | Orlando is aggressive. | contradiction |
Quinlan is cautious.
Quinlan is not cute.
Jimmy is aggressive.
Arlen is red.
Todd is lively.
Traci is not odd.
Orlando is not aggressive.
Jimmy is red.
Dave is not cute.
Arlen is not odd.
Quinlan is not aggressive.
Arlen is aggressive.Traci is not red if and only if Arlen is aggressive and Arlen is odd.
If there is at least one people who is not cute or odd, then Quinlan is not aggressive.
If someone is red, then he is both lively and not cute.
If someone is red or he is aggressive, then he is lively.
As long as someone is cute, he is aggressive and not cautious.
Someone who is eithor red or cautious is always not aggressive.
Someone is not odd and not lively if and only if he is not cautious and not cute.
All lively people are not cautious.
If someone is both not odd and not cautious, then he is not lively.
If Arlen is odd or Dave is not cute, then Dave is not cautious.
Someone who is aggressive is always both not odd and not red.
If someone is red, then he is odd, and vice versa. | Orlando is cute. | neutral |
Quinlan is cautious.
Quinlan is not cute.
Jimmy is aggressive.
Arlen is red.
Todd is lively.
Traci is not odd.
Orlando is not aggressive.
Jimmy is red.
Dave is not cute.
Arlen is not odd.
Quinlan is not aggressive.
Arlen is aggressive.Traci is not red if and only if Arlen is aggressive and Arlen is odd.
If there is at least one people who is not cute or odd, then Quinlan is not aggressive.
If someone is red, then he is both lively and not cute.
If someone is red or he is aggressive, then he is lively.
As long as someone is cute, he is aggressive and not cautious.
Someone who is eithor red or cautious is always not aggressive.
Someone is not odd and not lively if and only if he is not cautious and not cute.
All lively people are not cautious.
If someone is both not odd and not cautious, then he is not lively.
If Arlen is odd or Dave is not cute, then Dave is not cautious.
Someone who is aggressive is always both not odd and not red.
If someone is red, then he is odd, and vice versa. | Todd is cautious. | contradiction |
Quinlan is cautious.
Quinlan is not cute.
Jimmy is aggressive.
Arlen is red.
Todd is lively.
Traci is not odd.
Orlando is not aggressive.
Jimmy is red.
Dave is not cute.
Arlen is not odd.
Quinlan is not aggressive.
Arlen is aggressive.Traci is not red if and only if Arlen is aggressive and Arlen is odd.
If there is at least one people who is not cute or odd, then Quinlan is not aggressive.
If someone is red, then he is both lively and not cute.
If someone is red or he is aggressive, then he is lively.
As long as someone is cute, he is aggressive and not cautious.
Someone who is eithor red or cautious is always not aggressive.
Someone is not odd and not lively if and only if he is not cautious and not cute.
All lively people are not cautious.
If someone is both not odd and not cautious, then he is not lively.
If Arlen is odd or Dave is not cute, then Dave is not cautious.
Someone who is aggressive is always both not odd and not red.
If someone is red, then he is odd, and vice versa. | Arlen is not red. | self_contradiction |
Quinlan is cautious.
Quinlan is not cute.
Jimmy is aggressive.
Arlen is red.
Todd is lively.
Traci is not odd.
Orlando is not aggressive.
Jimmy is red.
Dave is not cute.
Arlen is not odd.
Quinlan is not aggressive.
Arlen is aggressive.Traci is not red if and only if Arlen is aggressive and Arlen is odd.
If there is at least one people who is not cute or odd, then Quinlan is not aggressive.
If someone is red, then he is both lively and not cute.
If someone is red or he is aggressive, then he is lively.
As long as someone is cute, he is aggressive and not cautious.
Someone who is eithor red or cautious is always not aggressive.
Someone is not odd and not lively if and only if he is not cautious and not cute.
All lively people are not cautious.
If someone is both not odd and not cautious, then he is not lively.
If Arlen is odd or Dave is not cute, then Dave is not cautious.
Someone who is aggressive is always both not odd and not red.
If someone is red, then he is odd, and vice versa. | Arlen is red. | self_contradiction |
Quinlan is cautious.
Quinlan is not cute.
Jimmy is aggressive.
Arlen is red.
Todd is lively.
Traci is not odd.
Orlando is not aggressive.
Jimmy is red.
Dave is not cute.
Arlen is not odd.
Quinlan is not aggressive.
Arlen is aggressive.Traci is not red if and only if Arlen is aggressive and Arlen is odd.
If there is at least one people who is not cute or odd, then Quinlan is not aggressive.
If someone is red, then he is both lively and not cute.
If someone is red or he is aggressive, then he is lively.
As long as someone is cute, he is aggressive and not cautious.
Someone who is eithor red or cautious is always not aggressive.
Someone is not odd and not lively if and only if he is not cautious and not cute.
All lively people are not cautious.
If someone is both not odd and not cautious, then he is not lively.
If Arlen is odd or Dave is not cute, then Dave is not cautious.
Someone who is aggressive is always both not odd and not red.
If someone is red, then he is odd, and vice versa. | Todd is not lively. | contradiction |
Quinlan is cautious.
Quinlan is not cute.
Jimmy is aggressive.
Arlen is red.
Todd is lively.
Traci is not odd.
Orlando is not aggressive.
Jimmy is red.
Dave is not cute.
Arlen is not odd.
Quinlan is not aggressive.
Arlen is aggressive.Traci is not red if and only if Arlen is aggressive and Arlen is odd.
If there is at least one people who is not cute or odd, then Quinlan is not aggressive.
If someone is red, then he is both lively and not cute.
If someone is red or he is aggressive, then he is lively.
As long as someone is cute, he is aggressive and not cautious.
Someone who is eithor red or cautious is always not aggressive.
Someone is not odd and not lively if and only if he is not cautious and not cute.
All lively people are not cautious.
If someone is both not odd and not cautious, then he is not lively.
If Arlen is odd or Dave is not cute, then Dave is not cautious.
Someone who is aggressive is always both not odd and not red.
If someone is red, then he is odd, and vice versa. | Quinlan is cute. | contradiction |
Quinlan is cautious.
Quinlan is not cute.
Jimmy is aggressive.
Arlen is red.
Todd is lively.
Traci is not odd.
Orlando is not aggressive.
Jimmy is red.
Dave is not cute.
Arlen is not odd.
Quinlan is not aggressive.
Arlen is aggressive.Traci is not red if and only if Arlen is aggressive and Arlen is odd.
If there is at least one people who is not cute or odd, then Quinlan is not aggressive.
If someone is red, then he is both lively and not cute.
If someone is red or he is aggressive, then he is lively.
As long as someone is cute, he is aggressive and not cautious.
Someone who is eithor red or cautious is always not aggressive.
Someone is not odd and not lively if and only if he is not cautious and not cute.
All lively people are not cautious.
If someone is both not odd and not cautious, then he is not lively.
If Arlen is odd or Dave is not cute, then Dave is not cautious.
Someone who is aggressive is always both not odd and not red.
If someone is red, then he is odd, and vice versa. | Dave is not aggressive. | neutral |
Quinlan is cautious.
Quinlan is not cute.
Jimmy is aggressive.
Arlen is red.
Todd is lively.
Traci is not odd.
Orlando is not aggressive.
Jimmy is red.
Dave is not cute.
Arlen is not odd.
Quinlan is not aggressive.
Arlen is aggressive.Traci is not red if and only if Arlen is aggressive and Arlen is odd.
If there is at least one people who is not cute or odd, then Quinlan is not aggressive.
If someone is red, then he is both lively and not cute.
If someone is red or he is aggressive, then he is lively.
As long as someone is cute, he is aggressive and not cautious.
Someone who is eithor red or cautious is always not aggressive.
Someone is not odd and not lively if and only if he is not cautious and not cute.
All lively people are not cautious.
If someone is both not odd and not cautious, then he is not lively.
If Arlen is odd or Dave is not cute, then Dave is not cautious.
Someone who is aggressive is always both not odd and not red.
If someone is red, then he is odd, and vice versa. | Todd is not red. | neutral |
Quinlan is cautious.
Quinlan is not cute.
Jimmy is aggressive.
Arlen is red.
Todd is lively.
Traci is not odd.
Orlando is not aggressive.
Jimmy is red.
Dave is not cute.
Arlen is not odd.
Quinlan is not aggressive.
Arlen is aggressive.Traci is not red if and only if Arlen is aggressive and Arlen is odd.
If there is at least one people who is not cute or odd, then Quinlan is not aggressive.
If someone is red, then he is both lively and not cute.
If someone is red or he is aggressive, then he is lively.
As long as someone is cute, he is aggressive and not cautious.
Someone who is eithor red or cautious is always not aggressive.
Someone is not odd and not lively if and only if he is not cautious and not cute.
All lively people are not cautious.
If someone is both not odd and not cautious, then he is not lively.
If Arlen is odd or Dave is not cute, then Dave is not cautious.
Someone who is aggressive is always both not odd and not red.
If someone is red, then he is odd, and vice versa. | Orlando is not aggressive. | entailment |
Quinlan is cautious.
Quinlan is not cute.
Jimmy is aggressive.
Arlen is red.
Todd is lively.
Traci is not odd.
Orlando is not aggressive.
Jimmy is red.
Dave is not cute.
Arlen is not odd.
Quinlan is not aggressive.
Arlen is aggressive.Traci is not red if and only if Arlen is aggressive and Arlen is odd.
If there is at least one people who is not cute or odd, then Quinlan is not aggressive.
If someone is red, then he is both lively and not cute.
If someone is red or he is aggressive, then he is lively.
As long as someone is cute, he is aggressive and not cautious.
Someone who is eithor red or cautious is always not aggressive.
Someone is not odd and not lively if and only if he is not cautious and not cute.
All lively people are not cautious.
If someone is both not odd and not cautious, then he is not lively.
If Arlen is odd or Dave is not cute, then Dave is not cautious.
Someone who is aggressive is always both not odd and not red.
If someone is red, then he is odd, and vice versa. | Jimmy is not lively. | self_contradiction |
Quinlan is cautious.
Quinlan is not cute.
Jimmy is aggressive.
Arlen is red.
Todd is lively.
Traci is not odd.
Orlando is not aggressive.
Jimmy is red.
Dave is not cute.
Arlen is not odd.
Quinlan is not aggressive.
Arlen is aggressive.Traci is not red if and only if Arlen is aggressive and Arlen is odd.
If there is at least one people who is not cute or odd, then Quinlan is not aggressive.
If someone is red, then he is both lively and not cute.
If someone is red or he is aggressive, then he is lively.
As long as someone is cute, he is aggressive and not cautious.
Someone who is eithor red or cautious is always not aggressive.
Someone is not odd and not lively if and only if he is not cautious and not cute.
All lively people are not cautious.
If someone is both not odd and not cautious, then he is not lively.
If Arlen is odd or Dave is not cute, then Dave is not cautious.
Someone who is aggressive is always both not odd and not red.
If someone is red, then he is odd, and vice versa. | Dave is not cute. | entailment |
Quinlan is cautious.
Quinlan is not cute.
Jimmy is aggressive.
Arlen is red.
Todd is lively.
Traci is not odd.
Orlando is not aggressive.
Jimmy is red.
Dave is not cute.
Arlen is not odd.
Quinlan is not aggressive.
Arlen is aggressive.Traci is not red if and only if Arlen is aggressive and Arlen is odd.
If there is at least one people who is not cute or odd, then Quinlan is not aggressive.
If someone is red, then he is both lively and not cute.
If someone is red or he is aggressive, then he is lively.
As long as someone is cute, he is aggressive and not cautious.
Someone who is eithor red or cautious is always not aggressive.
Someone is not odd and not lively if and only if he is not cautious and not cute.
All lively people are not cautious.
If someone is both not odd and not cautious, then he is not lively.
If Arlen is odd or Dave is not cute, then Dave is not cautious.
Someone who is aggressive is always both not odd and not red.
If someone is red, then he is odd, and vice versa. | Jimmy is odd. | self_contradiction |
Quinlan is cautious.
Quinlan is not cute.
Jimmy is aggressive.
Arlen is red.
Todd is lively.
Traci is not odd.
Orlando is not aggressive.
Jimmy is red.
Dave is not cute.
Arlen is not odd.
Quinlan is not aggressive.
Arlen is aggressive.Traci is not red if and only if Arlen is aggressive and Arlen is odd.
If there is at least one people who is not cute or odd, then Quinlan is not aggressive.
If someone is red, then he is both lively and not cute.
If someone is red or he is aggressive, then he is lively.
As long as someone is cute, he is aggressive and not cautious.
Someone who is eithor red or cautious is always not aggressive.
Someone is not odd and not lively if and only if he is not cautious and not cute.
All lively people are not cautious.
If someone is both not odd and not cautious, then he is not lively.
If Arlen is odd or Dave is not cute, then Dave is not cautious.
Someone who is aggressive is always both not odd and not red.
If someone is red, then he is odd, and vice versa. | Dave is not cautious. | entailment |
Quinlan is cautious.
Quinlan is not cute.
Jimmy is aggressive.
Arlen is red.
Todd is lively.
Traci is not odd.
Orlando is not aggressive.
Jimmy is red.
Dave is not cute.
Arlen is not odd.
Quinlan is not aggressive.
Arlen is aggressive.Traci is not red if and only if Arlen is aggressive and Arlen is odd.
If there is at least one people who is not cute or odd, then Quinlan is not aggressive.
If someone is red, then he is both lively and not cute.
If someone is red or he is aggressive, then he is lively.
As long as someone is cute, he is aggressive and not cautious.
Someone who is eithor red or cautious is always not aggressive.
Someone is not odd and not lively if and only if he is not cautious and not cute.
All lively people are not cautious.
If someone is both not odd and not cautious, then he is not lively.
If Arlen is odd or Dave is not cute, then Dave is not cautious.
Someone who is aggressive is always both not odd and not red.
If someone is red, then he is odd, and vice versa. | Orlando is not red. | neutral |
Quinlan is cautious.
Quinlan is not cute.
Jimmy is aggressive.
Arlen is red.
Todd is lively.
Traci is not odd.
Orlando is not aggressive.
Jimmy is red.
Dave is not cute.
Arlen is not odd.
Quinlan is not aggressive.
Arlen is aggressive.Traci is not red if and only if Arlen is aggressive and Arlen is odd.
If there is at least one people who is not cute or odd, then Quinlan is not aggressive.
If someone is red, then he is both lively and not cute.
If someone is red or he is aggressive, then he is lively.
As long as someone is cute, he is aggressive and not cautious.
Someone who is eithor red or cautious is always not aggressive.
Someone is not odd and not lively if and only if he is not cautious and not cute.
All lively people are not cautious.
If someone is both not odd and not cautious, then he is not lively.
If Arlen is odd or Dave is not cute, then Dave is not cautious.
Someone who is aggressive is always both not odd and not red.
If someone is red, then he is odd, and vice versa. | Todd is not cautious. | entailment |
Quinlan is cautious.
Quinlan is not cute.
Jimmy is aggressive.
Arlen is red.
Todd is lively.
Traci is not odd.
Orlando is not aggressive.
Jimmy is red.
Dave is not cute.
Arlen is not odd.
Quinlan is not aggressive.
Arlen is aggressive.Traci is not red if and only if Arlen is aggressive and Arlen is odd.
If there is at least one people who is not cute or odd, then Quinlan is not aggressive.
If someone is red, then he is both lively and not cute.
If someone is red or he is aggressive, then he is lively.
As long as someone is cute, he is aggressive and not cautious.
Someone who is eithor red or cautious is always not aggressive.
Someone is not odd and not lively if and only if he is not cautious and not cute.
All lively people are not cautious.
If someone is both not odd and not cautious, then he is not lively.
If Arlen is odd or Dave is not cute, then Dave is not cautious.
Someone who is aggressive is always both not odd and not red.
If someone is red, then he is odd, and vice versa. | Quinlan is cautious. | entailment |
Quinlan is cautious.
Quinlan is not cute.
Jimmy is aggressive.
Arlen is red.
Todd is lively.
Traci is not odd.
Orlando is not aggressive.
Jimmy is red.
Dave is not cute.
Arlen is not odd.
Quinlan is not aggressive.
Arlen is aggressive.Traci is not red if and only if Arlen is aggressive and Arlen is odd.
If there is at least one people who is not cute or odd, then Quinlan is not aggressive.
If someone is red, then he is both lively and not cute.
If someone is red or he is aggressive, then he is lively.
As long as someone is cute, he is aggressive and not cautious.
Someone who is eithor red or cautious is always not aggressive.
Someone is not odd and not lively if and only if he is not cautious and not cute.
All lively people are not cautious.
If someone is both not odd and not cautious, then he is not lively.
If Arlen is odd or Dave is not cute, then Dave is not cautious.
Someone who is aggressive is always both not odd and not red.
If someone is red, then he is odd, and vice versa. | Arlen is not odd. | self_contradiction |
Quinlan is cautious.
Quinlan is not cute.
Jimmy is aggressive.
Arlen is red.
Todd is lively.
Traci is not odd.
Orlando is not aggressive.
Jimmy is red.
Dave is not cute.
Arlen is not odd.
Quinlan is not aggressive.
Arlen is aggressive.Traci is not red if and only if Arlen is aggressive and Arlen is odd.
If there is at least one people who is not cute or odd, then Quinlan is not aggressive.
If someone is red, then he is both lively and not cute.
If someone is red or he is aggressive, then he is lively.
As long as someone is cute, he is aggressive and not cautious.
Someone who is eithor red or cautious is always not aggressive.
Someone is not odd and not lively if and only if he is not cautious and not cute.
All lively people are not cautious.
If someone is both not odd and not cautious, then he is not lively.
If Arlen is odd or Dave is not cute, then Dave is not cautious.
Someone who is aggressive is always both not odd and not red.
If someone is red, then he is odd, and vice versa. | Todd is not odd. | neutral |
Quinlan is cautious.
Quinlan is not cute.
Jimmy is aggressive.
Arlen is red.
Todd is lively.
Traci is not odd.
Orlando is not aggressive.
Jimmy is red.
Dave is not cute.
Arlen is not odd.
Quinlan is not aggressive.
Arlen is aggressive.Traci is not red if and only if Arlen is aggressive and Arlen is odd.
If there is at least one people who is not cute or odd, then Quinlan is not aggressive.
If someone is red, then he is both lively and not cute.
If someone is red or he is aggressive, then he is lively.
As long as someone is cute, he is aggressive and not cautious.
Someone who is eithor red or cautious is always not aggressive.
Someone is not odd and not lively if and only if he is not cautious and not cute.
All lively people are not cautious.
If someone is both not odd and not cautious, then he is not lively.
If Arlen is odd or Dave is not cute, then Dave is not cautious.
Someone who is aggressive is always both not odd and not red.
If someone is red, then he is odd, and vice versa. | Dave is cautious. | contradiction |
Sheridan is not impartial.
Goddard is adventurous.
Solomon is not afraid.
Kiefer is not adventurous.
Sheridan is not brave.
Amanda is brave.
Kiefer is not afraid.
Sheridan is not afraid.
Sandy is not brave.
Solomon is not brave.
Theodore is not jealous.
Goddard is not impartial.As long as someone is not brave, he is impartial and jealous.
If there is someone who is either thoughtful or not brave, then Theodore is not adventurous.
Goddard being adventurous implies that Sheridan is not impartial.
If there is at least one people who is not afraid, then Sheridan is thoughtful.
If someone is not jealous or he is not afraid, then he is impartial.
If there is someone who is either adventurous or not thoughtful, then Sandy is afraid.
Someone who is both not thoughtful and not adventurous is always not jealous.
Someone being both adventurous and afraid is equivalent to being not jealous and not brave.
If there is at least one people who is both impartial and not brave, then Theodore is not jealous.
It can be concluded that Theodore is not brave and Solomon is not jealous once knowing that Sandy is not thoughtful and Kiefer is adventurous.
Someone being not afraid is equivalent to being thoughtful.
Someone being not brave is equivalent to being not impartial. | Goddard is adventurous. | entailment |
Sheridan is not impartial.
Goddard is adventurous.
Solomon is not afraid.
Kiefer is not adventurous.
Sheridan is not brave.
Amanda is brave.
Kiefer is not afraid.
Sheridan is not afraid.
Sandy is not brave.
Solomon is not brave.
Theodore is not jealous.
Goddard is not impartial.As long as someone is not brave, he is impartial and jealous.
If there is someone who is either thoughtful or not brave, then Theodore is not adventurous.
Goddard being adventurous implies that Sheridan is not impartial.
If there is at least one people who is not afraid, then Sheridan is thoughtful.
If someone is not jealous or he is not afraid, then he is impartial.
If there is someone who is either adventurous or not thoughtful, then Sandy is afraid.
Someone who is both not thoughtful and not adventurous is always not jealous.
Someone being both adventurous and afraid is equivalent to being not jealous and not brave.
If there is at least one people who is both impartial and not brave, then Theodore is not jealous.
It can be concluded that Theodore is not brave and Solomon is not jealous once knowing that Sandy is not thoughtful and Kiefer is adventurous.
Someone being not afraid is equivalent to being thoughtful.
Someone being not brave is equivalent to being not impartial. | Theodore is not adventurous. | entailment |
Sheridan is not impartial.
Goddard is adventurous.
Solomon is not afraid.
Kiefer is not adventurous.
Sheridan is not brave.
Amanda is brave.
Kiefer is not afraid.
Sheridan is not afraid.
Sandy is not brave.
Solomon is not brave.
Theodore is not jealous.
Goddard is not impartial.As long as someone is not brave, he is impartial and jealous.
If there is someone who is either thoughtful or not brave, then Theodore is not adventurous.
Goddard being adventurous implies that Sheridan is not impartial.
If there is at least one people who is not afraid, then Sheridan is thoughtful.
If someone is not jealous or he is not afraid, then he is impartial.
If there is someone who is either adventurous or not thoughtful, then Sandy is afraid.
Someone who is both not thoughtful and not adventurous is always not jealous.
Someone being both adventurous and afraid is equivalent to being not jealous and not brave.
If there is at least one people who is both impartial and not brave, then Theodore is not jealous.
It can be concluded that Theodore is not brave and Solomon is not jealous once knowing that Sandy is not thoughtful and Kiefer is adventurous.
Someone being not afraid is equivalent to being thoughtful.
Someone being not brave is equivalent to being not impartial. | Amanda is impartial. | neutral |
Sheridan is not impartial.
Goddard is adventurous.
Solomon is not afraid.
Kiefer is not adventurous.
Sheridan is not brave.
Amanda is brave.
Kiefer is not afraid.
Sheridan is not afraid.
Sandy is not brave.
Solomon is not brave.
Theodore is not jealous.
Goddard is not impartial.As long as someone is not brave, he is impartial and jealous.
If there is someone who is either thoughtful or not brave, then Theodore is not adventurous.
Goddard being adventurous implies that Sheridan is not impartial.
If there is at least one people who is not afraid, then Sheridan is thoughtful.
If someone is not jealous or he is not afraid, then he is impartial.
If there is someone who is either adventurous or not thoughtful, then Sandy is afraid.
Someone who is both not thoughtful and not adventurous is always not jealous.
Someone being both adventurous and afraid is equivalent to being not jealous and not brave.
If there is at least one people who is both impartial and not brave, then Theodore is not jealous.
It can be concluded that Theodore is not brave and Solomon is not jealous once knowing that Sandy is not thoughtful and Kiefer is adventurous.
Someone being not afraid is equivalent to being thoughtful.
Someone being not brave is equivalent to being not impartial. | Goddard is brave. | contradiction |
Sheridan is not impartial.
Goddard is adventurous.
Solomon is not afraid.
Kiefer is not adventurous.
Sheridan is not brave.
Amanda is brave.
Kiefer is not afraid.
Sheridan is not afraid.
Sandy is not brave.
Solomon is not brave.
Theodore is not jealous.
Goddard is not impartial.As long as someone is not brave, he is impartial and jealous.
If there is someone who is either thoughtful or not brave, then Theodore is not adventurous.
Goddard being adventurous implies that Sheridan is not impartial.
If there is at least one people who is not afraid, then Sheridan is thoughtful.
If someone is not jealous or he is not afraid, then he is impartial.
If there is someone who is either adventurous or not thoughtful, then Sandy is afraid.
Someone who is both not thoughtful and not adventurous is always not jealous.
Someone being both adventurous and afraid is equivalent to being not jealous and not brave.
If there is at least one people who is both impartial and not brave, then Theodore is not jealous.
It can be concluded that Theodore is not brave and Solomon is not jealous once knowing that Sandy is not thoughtful and Kiefer is adventurous.
Someone being not afraid is equivalent to being thoughtful.
Someone being not brave is equivalent to being not impartial. | Solomon is brave. | contradiction |
Sheridan is not impartial.
Goddard is adventurous.
Solomon is not afraid.
Kiefer is not adventurous.
Sheridan is not brave.
Amanda is brave.
Kiefer is not afraid.
Sheridan is not afraid.
Sandy is not brave.
Solomon is not brave.
Theodore is not jealous.
Goddard is not impartial.As long as someone is not brave, he is impartial and jealous.
If there is someone who is either thoughtful or not brave, then Theodore is not adventurous.
Goddard being adventurous implies that Sheridan is not impartial.
If there is at least one people who is not afraid, then Sheridan is thoughtful.
If someone is not jealous or he is not afraid, then he is impartial.
If there is someone who is either adventurous or not thoughtful, then Sandy is afraid.
Someone who is both not thoughtful and not adventurous is always not jealous.
Someone being both adventurous and afraid is equivalent to being not jealous and not brave.
If there is at least one people who is both impartial and not brave, then Theodore is not jealous.
It can be concluded that Theodore is not brave and Solomon is not jealous once knowing that Sandy is not thoughtful and Kiefer is adventurous.
Someone being not afraid is equivalent to being thoughtful.
Someone being not brave is equivalent to being not impartial. | Sheridan is not impartial. | self_contradiction |
Sheridan is not impartial.
Goddard is adventurous.
Solomon is not afraid.
Kiefer is not adventurous.
Sheridan is not brave.
Amanda is brave.
Kiefer is not afraid.
Sheridan is not afraid.
Sandy is not brave.
Solomon is not brave.
Theodore is not jealous.
Goddard is not impartial.As long as someone is not brave, he is impartial and jealous.
If there is someone who is either thoughtful or not brave, then Theodore is not adventurous.
Goddard being adventurous implies that Sheridan is not impartial.
If there is at least one people who is not afraid, then Sheridan is thoughtful.
If someone is not jealous or he is not afraid, then he is impartial.
If there is someone who is either adventurous or not thoughtful, then Sandy is afraid.
Someone who is both not thoughtful and not adventurous is always not jealous.
Someone being both adventurous and afraid is equivalent to being not jealous and not brave.
If there is at least one people who is both impartial and not brave, then Theodore is not jealous.
It can be concluded that Theodore is not brave and Solomon is not jealous once knowing that Sandy is not thoughtful and Kiefer is adventurous.
Someone being not afraid is equivalent to being thoughtful.
Someone being not brave is equivalent to being not impartial. | Sandy is not adventurous. | neutral |
Sheridan is not impartial.
Goddard is adventurous.
Solomon is not afraid.
Kiefer is not adventurous.
Sheridan is not brave.
Amanda is brave.
Kiefer is not afraid.
Sheridan is not afraid.
Sandy is not brave.
Solomon is not brave.
Theodore is not jealous.
Goddard is not impartial.As long as someone is not brave, he is impartial and jealous.
If there is someone who is either thoughtful or not brave, then Theodore is not adventurous.
Goddard being adventurous implies that Sheridan is not impartial.
If there is at least one people who is not afraid, then Sheridan is thoughtful.
If someone is not jealous or he is not afraid, then he is impartial.
If there is someone who is either adventurous or not thoughtful, then Sandy is afraid.
Someone who is both not thoughtful and not adventurous is always not jealous.
Someone being both adventurous and afraid is equivalent to being not jealous and not brave.
If there is at least one people who is both impartial and not brave, then Theodore is not jealous.
It can be concluded that Theodore is not brave and Solomon is not jealous once knowing that Sandy is not thoughtful and Kiefer is adventurous.
Someone being not afraid is equivalent to being thoughtful.
Someone being not brave is equivalent to being not impartial. | Solomon is impartial. | self_contradiction |
Sheridan is not impartial.
Goddard is adventurous.
Solomon is not afraid.
Kiefer is not adventurous.
Sheridan is not brave.
Amanda is brave.
Kiefer is not afraid.
Sheridan is not afraid.
Sandy is not brave.
Solomon is not brave.
Theodore is not jealous.
Goddard is not impartial.As long as someone is not brave, he is impartial and jealous.
If there is someone who is either thoughtful or not brave, then Theodore is not adventurous.
Goddard being adventurous implies that Sheridan is not impartial.
If there is at least one people who is not afraid, then Sheridan is thoughtful.
If someone is not jealous or he is not afraid, then he is impartial.
If there is someone who is either adventurous or not thoughtful, then Sandy is afraid.
Someone who is both not thoughtful and not adventurous is always not jealous.
Someone being both adventurous and afraid is equivalent to being not jealous and not brave.
If there is at least one people who is both impartial and not brave, then Theodore is not jealous.
It can be concluded that Theodore is not brave and Solomon is not jealous once knowing that Sandy is not thoughtful and Kiefer is adventurous.
Someone being not afraid is equivalent to being thoughtful.
Someone being not brave is equivalent to being not impartial. | Goddard is not impartial. | self_contradiction |
Sheridan is not impartial.
Goddard is adventurous.
Solomon is not afraid.
Kiefer is not adventurous.
Sheridan is not brave.
Amanda is brave.
Kiefer is not afraid.
Sheridan is not afraid.
Sandy is not brave.
Solomon is not brave.
Theodore is not jealous.
Goddard is not impartial.As long as someone is not brave, he is impartial and jealous.
If there is someone who is either thoughtful or not brave, then Theodore is not adventurous.
Goddard being adventurous implies that Sheridan is not impartial.
If there is at least one people who is not afraid, then Sheridan is thoughtful.
If someone is not jealous or he is not afraid, then he is impartial.
If there is someone who is either adventurous or not thoughtful, then Sandy is afraid.
Someone who is both not thoughtful and not adventurous is always not jealous.
Someone being both adventurous and afraid is equivalent to being not jealous and not brave.
If there is at least one people who is both impartial and not brave, then Theodore is not jealous.
It can be concluded that Theodore is not brave and Solomon is not jealous once knowing that Sandy is not thoughtful and Kiefer is adventurous.
Someone being not afraid is equivalent to being thoughtful.
Someone being not brave is equivalent to being not impartial. | Sandy is not impartial. | self_contradiction |
Sheridan is not impartial.
Goddard is adventurous.
Solomon is not afraid.
Kiefer is not adventurous.
Sheridan is not brave.
Amanda is brave.
Kiefer is not afraid.
Sheridan is not afraid.
Sandy is not brave.
Solomon is not brave.
Theodore is not jealous.
Goddard is not impartial.As long as someone is not brave, he is impartial and jealous.
If there is someone who is either thoughtful or not brave, then Theodore is not adventurous.
Goddard being adventurous implies that Sheridan is not impartial.
If there is at least one people who is not afraid, then Sheridan is thoughtful.
If someone is not jealous or he is not afraid, then he is impartial.
If there is someone who is either adventurous or not thoughtful, then Sandy is afraid.
Someone who is both not thoughtful and not adventurous is always not jealous.
Someone being both adventurous and afraid is equivalent to being not jealous and not brave.
If there is at least one people who is both impartial and not brave, then Theodore is not jealous.
It can be concluded that Theodore is not brave and Solomon is not jealous once knowing that Sandy is not thoughtful and Kiefer is adventurous.
Someone being not afraid is equivalent to being thoughtful.
Someone being not brave is equivalent to being not impartial. | Theodore is brave. | neutral |
Sheridan is not impartial.
Goddard is adventurous.
Solomon is not afraid.
Kiefer is not adventurous.
Sheridan is not brave.
Amanda is brave.
Kiefer is not afraid.
Sheridan is not afraid.
Sandy is not brave.
Solomon is not brave.
Theodore is not jealous.
Goddard is not impartial.As long as someone is not brave, he is impartial and jealous.
If there is someone who is either thoughtful or not brave, then Theodore is not adventurous.
Goddard being adventurous implies that Sheridan is not impartial.
If there is at least one people who is not afraid, then Sheridan is thoughtful.
If someone is not jealous or he is not afraid, then he is impartial.
If there is someone who is either adventurous or not thoughtful, then Sandy is afraid.
Someone who is both not thoughtful and not adventurous is always not jealous.
Someone being both adventurous and afraid is equivalent to being not jealous and not brave.
If there is at least one people who is both impartial and not brave, then Theodore is not jealous.
It can be concluded that Theodore is not brave and Solomon is not jealous once knowing that Sandy is not thoughtful and Kiefer is adventurous.
Someone being not afraid is equivalent to being thoughtful.
Someone being not brave is equivalent to being not impartial. | Amanda is not brave. | contradiction |
Sheridan is not impartial.
Goddard is adventurous.
Solomon is not afraid.
Kiefer is not adventurous.
Sheridan is not brave.
Amanda is brave.
Kiefer is not afraid.
Sheridan is not afraid.
Sandy is not brave.
Solomon is not brave.
Theodore is not jealous.
Goddard is not impartial.As long as someone is not brave, he is impartial and jealous.
If there is someone who is either thoughtful or not brave, then Theodore is not adventurous.
Goddard being adventurous implies that Sheridan is not impartial.
If there is at least one people who is not afraid, then Sheridan is thoughtful.
If someone is not jealous or he is not afraid, then he is impartial.
If there is someone who is either adventurous or not thoughtful, then Sandy is afraid.
Someone who is both not thoughtful and not adventurous is always not jealous.
Someone being both adventurous and afraid is equivalent to being not jealous and not brave.
If there is at least one people who is both impartial and not brave, then Theodore is not jealous.
It can be concluded that Theodore is not brave and Solomon is not jealous once knowing that Sandy is not thoughtful and Kiefer is adventurous.
Someone being not afraid is equivalent to being thoughtful.
Someone being not brave is equivalent to being not impartial. | Solomon is jealous. | entailment |
Sheridan is not impartial.
Goddard is adventurous.
Solomon is not afraid.
Kiefer is not adventurous.
Sheridan is not brave.
Amanda is brave.
Kiefer is not afraid.
Sheridan is not afraid.
Sandy is not brave.
Solomon is not brave.
Theodore is not jealous.
Goddard is not impartial.As long as someone is not brave, he is impartial and jealous.
If there is someone who is either thoughtful or not brave, then Theodore is not adventurous.
Goddard being adventurous implies that Sheridan is not impartial.
If there is at least one people who is not afraid, then Sheridan is thoughtful.
If someone is not jealous or he is not afraid, then he is impartial.
If there is someone who is either adventurous or not thoughtful, then Sandy is afraid.
Someone who is both not thoughtful and not adventurous is always not jealous.
Someone being both adventurous and afraid is equivalent to being not jealous and not brave.
If there is at least one people who is both impartial and not brave, then Theodore is not jealous.
It can be concluded that Theodore is not brave and Solomon is not jealous once knowing that Sandy is not thoughtful and Kiefer is adventurous.
Someone being not afraid is equivalent to being thoughtful.
Someone being not brave is equivalent to being not impartial. | Theodore is thoughtful. | neutral |
Sheridan is not impartial.
Goddard is adventurous.
Solomon is not afraid.
Kiefer is not adventurous.
Sheridan is not brave.
Amanda is brave.
Kiefer is not afraid.
Sheridan is not afraid.
Sandy is not brave.
Solomon is not brave.
Theodore is not jealous.
Goddard is not impartial.As long as someone is not brave, he is impartial and jealous.
If there is someone who is either thoughtful or not brave, then Theodore is not adventurous.
Goddard being adventurous implies that Sheridan is not impartial.
If there is at least one people who is not afraid, then Sheridan is thoughtful.
If someone is not jealous or he is not afraid, then he is impartial.
If there is someone who is either adventurous or not thoughtful, then Sandy is afraid.
Someone who is both not thoughtful and not adventurous is always not jealous.
Someone being both adventurous and afraid is equivalent to being not jealous and not brave.
If there is at least one people who is both impartial and not brave, then Theodore is not jealous.
It can be concluded that Theodore is not brave and Solomon is not jealous once knowing that Sandy is not thoughtful and Kiefer is adventurous.
Someone being not afraid is equivalent to being thoughtful.
Someone being not brave is equivalent to being not impartial. | Sandy is jealous. | entailment |
Sheridan is not impartial.
Goddard is adventurous.
Solomon is not afraid.
Kiefer is not adventurous.
Sheridan is not brave.
Amanda is brave.
Kiefer is not afraid.
Sheridan is not afraid.
Sandy is not brave.
Solomon is not brave.
Theodore is not jealous.
Goddard is not impartial.As long as someone is not brave, he is impartial and jealous.
If there is someone who is either thoughtful or not brave, then Theodore is not adventurous.
Goddard being adventurous implies that Sheridan is not impartial.
If there is at least one people who is not afraid, then Sheridan is thoughtful.
If someone is not jealous or he is not afraid, then he is impartial.
If there is someone who is either adventurous or not thoughtful, then Sandy is afraid.
Someone who is both not thoughtful and not adventurous is always not jealous.
Someone being both adventurous and afraid is equivalent to being not jealous and not brave.
If there is at least one people who is both impartial and not brave, then Theodore is not jealous.
It can be concluded that Theodore is not brave and Solomon is not jealous once knowing that Sandy is not thoughtful and Kiefer is adventurous.
Someone being not afraid is equivalent to being thoughtful.
Someone being not brave is equivalent to being not impartial. | Sandy is impartial. | self_contradiction |
Sheridan is not impartial.
Goddard is adventurous.
Solomon is not afraid.
Kiefer is not adventurous.
Sheridan is not brave.
Amanda is brave.
Kiefer is not afraid.
Sheridan is not afraid.
Sandy is not brave.
Solomon is not brave.
Theodore is not jealous.
Goddard is not impartial.As long as someone is not brave, he is impartial and jealous.
If there is someone who is either thoughtful or not brave, then Theodore is not adventurous.
Goddard being adventurous implies that Sheridan is not impartial.
If there is at least one people who is not afraid, then Sheridan is thoughtful.
If someone is not jealous or he is not afraid, then he is impartial.
If there is someone who is either adventurous or not thoughtful, then Sandy is afraid.
Someone who is both not thoughtful and not adventurous is always not jealous.
Someone being both adventurous and afraid is equivalent to being not jealous and not brave.
If there is at least one people who is both impartial and not brave, then Theodore is not jealous.
It can be concluded that Theodore is not brave and Solomon is not jealous once knowing that Sandy is not thoughtful and Kiefer is adventurous.
Someone being not afraid is equivalent to being thoughtful.
Someone being not brave is equivalent to being not impartial. | Theodore is impartial. | entailment |
Sheridan is not impartial.
Goddard is adventurous.
Solomon is not afraid.
Kiefer is not adventurous.
Sheridan is not brave.
Amanda is brave.
Kiefer is not afraid.
Sheridan is not afraid.
Sandy is not brave.
Solomon is not brave.
Theodore is not jealous.
Goddard is not impartial.As long as someone is not brave, he is impartial and jealous.
If there is someone who is either thoughtful or not brave, then Theodore is not adventurous.
Goddard being adventurous implies that Sheridan is not impartial.
If there is at least one people who is not afraid, then Sheridan is thoughtful.
If someone is not jealous or he is not afraid, then he is impartial.
If there is someone who is either adventurous or not thoughtful, then Sandy is afraid.
Someone who is both not thoughtful and not adventurous is always not jealous.
Someone being both adventurous and afraid is equivalent to being not jealous and not brave.
If there is at least one people who is both impartial and not brave, then Theodore is not jealous.
It can be concluded that Theodore is not brave and Solomon is not jealous once knowing that Sandy is not thoughtful and Kiefer is adventurous.
Someone being not afraid is equivalent to being thoughtful.
Someone being not brave is equivalent to being not impartial. | Goddard is afraid. | neutral |
Sheridan is not impartial.
Goddard is adventurous.
Solomon is not afraid.
Kiefer is not adventurous.
Sheridan is not brave.
Amanda is brave.
Kiefer is not afraid.
Sheridan is not afraid.
Sandy is not brave.
Solomon is not brave.
Theodore is not jealous.
Goddard is not impartial.As long as someone is not brave, he is impartial and jealous.
If there is someone who is either thoughtful or not brave, then Theodore is not adventurous.
Goddard being adventurous implies that Sheridan is not impartial.
If there is at least one people who is not afraid, then Sheridan is thoughtful.
If someone is not jealous or he is not afraid, then he is impartial.
If there is someone who is either adventurous or not thoughtful, then Sandy is afraid.
Someone who is both not thoughtful and not adventurous is always not jealous.
Someone being both adventurous and afraid is equivalent to being not jealous and not brave.
If there is at least one people who is both impartial and not brave, then Theodore is not jealous.
It can be concluded that Theodore is not brave and Solomon is not jealous once knowing that Sandy is not thoughtful and Kiefer is adventurous.
Someone being not afraid is equivalent to being thoughtful.
Someone being not brave is equivalent to being not impartial. | Sheridan is brave. | contradiction |
Sheridan is not impartial.
Goddard is adventurous.
Solomon is not afraid.
Kiefer is not adventurous.
Sheridan is not brave.
Amanda is brave.
Kiefer is not afraid.
Sheridan is not afraid.
Sandy is not brave.
Solomon is not brave.
Theodore is not jealous.
Goddard is not impartial.As long as someone is not brave, he is impartial and jealous.
If there is someone who is either thoughtful or not brave, then Theodore is not adventurous.
Goddard being adventurous implies that Sheridan is not impartial.
If there is at least one people who is not afraid, then Sheridan is thoughtful.
If someone is not jealous or he is not afraid, then he is impartial.
If there is someone who is either adventurous or not thoughtful, then Sandy is afraid.
Someone who is both not thoughtful and not adventurous is always not jealous.
Someone being both adventurous and afraid is equivalent to being not jealous and not brave.
If there is at least one people who is both impartial and not brave, then Theodore is not jealous.
It can be concluded that Theodore is not brave and Solomon is not jealous once knowing that Sandy is not thoughtful and Kiefer is adventurous.
Someone being not afraid is equivalent to being thoughtful.
Someone being not brave is equivalent to being not impartial. | Solomon is not thoughtful. | contradiction |
Ridley is petite.
Marvin is not automatic.
Hall is not busy.
Culver is automatic.
Tommy is not busy.
Hall is not tired.
Marvin is beige.
Tommy is petite.
Culver is not blue-eyed.
Culver is tired.
Keene is beige.
Trevor is not busy.Marvin being not blue-eyed is equivalent to Keene being busy and Hall being not automatic.
It can be concluded that Keene is not beige once knowing that Culver is not blue-eyed.
Someone who is petite is always both blue-eyed and not tired.
Someone is not beige if and only if he is blue-eyed.
If someone is beige, then he is not petite, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not busy and not automatic is always not beige.
If there is someone who is both automatic and not busy, then Hall is not petite and Tommy is beige.
Culver being petite and Culver being tired imply that Ridley is not beige.
Someone who is eithor not automatic or tired is always petite.
Someone who is tired is always both beige and not petite.
Keene being beige and Hall being not busy imply that Hall is automatic and Ridley is blue-eyed.
If there is someone who is either automatic or busy, then Ridley is not blue-eyed. | Culver is not blue-eyed. | self_contradiction |
Ridley is petite.
Marvin is not automatic.
Hall is not busy.
Culver is automatic.
Tommy is not busy.
Hall is not tired.
Marvin is beige.
Tommy is petite.
Culver is not blue-eyed.
Culver is tired.
Keene is beige.
Trevor is not busy.Marvin being not blue-eyed is equivalent to Keene being busy and Hall being not automatic.
It can be concluded that Keene is not beige once knowing that Culver is not blue-eyed.
Someone who is petite is always both blue-eyed and not tired.
Someone is not beige if and only if he is blue-eyed.
If someone is beige, then he is not petite, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not busy and not automatic is always not beige.
If there is someone who is both automatic and not busy, then Hall is not petite and Tommy is beige.
Culver being petite and Culver being tired imply that Ridley is not beige.
Someone who is eithor not automatic or tired is always petite.
Someone who is tired is always both beige and not petite.
Keene being beige and Hall being not busy imply that Hall is automatic and Ridley is blue-eyed.
If there is someone who is either automatic or busy, then Ridley is not blue-eyed. | Keene is not blue-eyed. | contradiction |
Ridley is petite.
Marvin is not automatic.
Hall is not busy.
Culver is automatic.
Tommy is not busy.
Hall is not tired.
Marvin is beige.
Tommy is petite.
Culver is not blue-eyed.
Culver is tired.
Keene is beige.
Trevor is not busy.Marvin being not blue-eyed is equivalent to Keene being busy and Hall being not automatic.
It can be concluded that Keene is not beige once knowing that Culver is not blue-eyed.
Someone who is petite is always both blue-eyed and not tired.
Someone is not beige if and only if he is blue-eyed.
If someone is beige, then he is not petite, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not busy and not automatic is always not beige.
If there is someone who is both automatic and not busy, then Hall is not petite and Tommy is beige.
Culver being petite and Culver being tired imply that Ridley is not beige.
Someone who is eithor not automatic or tired is always petite.
Someone who is tired is always both beige and not petite.
Keene being beige and Hall being not busy imply that Hall is automatic and Ridley is blue-eyed.
If there is someone who is either automatic or busy, then Ridley is not blue-eyed. | Tommy is beige. | contradiction |
Ridley is petite.
Marvin is not automatic.
Hall is not busy.
Culver is automatic.
Tommy is not busy.
Hall is not tired.
Marvin is beige.
Tommy is petite.
Culver is not blue-eyed.
Culver is tired.
Keene is beige.
Trevor is not busy.Marvin being not blue-eyed is equivalent to Keene being busy and Hall being not automatic.
It can be concluded that Keene is not beige once knowing that Culver is not blue-eyed.
Someone who is petite is always both blue-eyed and not tired.
Someone is not beige if and only if he is blue-eyed.
If someone is beige, then he is not petite, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not busy and not automatic is always not beige.
If there is someone who is both automatic and not busy, then Hall is not petite and Tommy is beige.
Culver being petite and Culver being tired imply that Ridley is not beige.
Someone who is eithor not automatic or tired is always petite.
Someone who is tired is always both beige and not petite.
Keene being beige and Hall being not busy imply that Hall is automatic and Ridley is blue-eyed.
If there is someone who is either automatic or busy, then Ridley is not blue-eyed. | Culver is tired. | self_contradiction |
Ridley is petite.
Marvin is not automatic.
Hall is not busy.
Culver is automatic.
Tommy is not busy.
Hall is not tired.
Marvin is beige.
Tommy is petite.
Culver is not blue-eyed.
Culver is tired.
Keene is beige.
Trevor is not busy.Marvin being not blue-eyed is equivalent to Keene being busy and Hall being not automatic.
It can be concluded that Keene is not beige once knowing that Culver is not blue-eyed.
Someone who is petite is always both blue-eyed and not tired.
Someone is not beige if and only if he is blue-eyed.
If someone is beige, then he is not petite, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not busy and not automatic is always not beige.
If there is someone who is both automatic and not busy, then Hall is not petite and Tommy is beige.
Culver being petite and Culver being tired imply that Ridley is not beige.
Someone who is eithor not automatic or tired is always petite.
Someone who is tired is always both beige and not petite.
Keene being beige and Hall being not busy imply that Hall is automatic and Ridley is blue-eyed.
If there is someone who is either automatic or busy, then Ridley is not blue-eyed. | Hall is not busy. | entailment |
Ridley is petite.
Marvin is not automatic.
Hall is not busy.
Culver is automatic.
Tommy is not busy.
Hall is not tired.
Marvin is beige.
Tommy is petite.
Culver is not blue-eyed.
Culver is tired.
Keene is beige.
Trevor is not busy.Marvin being not blue-eyed is equivalent to Keene being busy and Hall being not automatic.
It can be concluded that Keene is not beige once knowing that Culver is not blue-eyed.
Someone who is petite is always both blue-eyed and not tired.
Someone is not beige if and only if he is blue-eyed.
If someone is beige, then he is not petite, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not busy and not automatic is always not beige.
If there is someone who is both automatic and not busy, then Hall is not petite and Tommy is beige.
Culver being petite and Culver being tired imply that Ridley is not beige.
Someone who is eithor not automatic or tired is always petite.
Someone who is tired is always both beige and not petite.
Keene being beige and Hall being not busy imply that Hall is automatic and Ridley is blue-eyed.
If there is someone who is either automatic or busy, then Ridley is not blue-eyed. | Culver is not tired. | self_contradiction |
Ridley is petite.
Marvin is not automatic.
Hall is not busy.
Culver is automatic.
Tommy is not busy.
Hall is not tired.
Marvin is beige.
Tommy is petite.
Culver is not blue-eyed.
Culver is tired.
Keene is beige.
Trevor is not busy.Marvin being not blue-eyed is equivalent to Keene being busy and Hall being not automatic.
It can be concluded that Keene is not beige once knowing that Culver is not blue-eyed.
Someone who is petite is always both blue-eyed and not tired.
Someone is not beige if and only if he is blue-eyed.
If someone is beige, then he is not petite, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not busy and not automatic is always not beige.
If there is someone who is both automatic and not busy, then Hall is not petite and Tommy is beige.
Culver being petite and Culver being tired imply that Ridley is not beige.
Someone who is eithor not automatic or tired is always petite.
Someone who is tired is always both beige and not petite.
Keene being beige and Hall being not busy imply that Hall is automatic and Ridley is blue-eyed.
If there is someone who is either automatic or busy, then Ridley is not blue-eyed. | Hall is automatic. | entailment |
Ridley is petite.
Marvin is not automatic.
Hall is not busy.
Culver is automatic.
Tommy is not busy.
Hall is not tired.
Marvin is beige.
Tommy is petite.
Culver is not blue-eyed.
Culver is tired.
Keene is beige.
Trevor is not busy.Marvin being not blue-eyed is equivalent to Keene being busy and Hall being not automatic.
It can be concluded that Keene is not beige once knowing that Culver is not blue-eyed.
Someone who is petite is always both blue-eyed and not tired.
Someone is not beige if and only if he is blue-eyed.
If someone is beige, then he is not petite, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not busy and not automatic is always not beige.
If there is someone who is both automatic and not busy, then Hall is not petite and Tommy is beige.
Culver being petite and Culver being tired imply that Ridley is not beige.
Someone who is eithor not automatic or tired is always petite.
Someone who is tired is always both beige and not petite.
Keene being beige and Hall being not busy imply that Hall is automatic and Ridley is blue-eyed.
If there is someone who is either automatic or busy, then Ridley is not blue-eyed. | Culver is blue-eyed. | self_contradiction |
Ridley is petite.
Marvin is not automatic.
Hall is not busy.
Culver is automatic.
Tommy is not busy.
Hall is not tired.
Marvin is beige.
Tommy is petite.
Culver is not blue-eyed.
Culver is tired.
Keene is beige.
Trevor is not busy.Marvin being not blue-eyed is equivalent to Keene being busy and Hall being not automatic.
It can be concluded that Keene is not beige once knowing that Culver is not blue-eyed.
Someone who is petite is always both blue-eyed and not tired.
Someone is not beige if and only if he is blue-eyed.
If someone is beige, then he is not petite, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not busy and not automatic is always not beige.
If there is someone who is both automatic and not busy, then Hall is not petite and Tommy is beige.
Culver being petite and Culver being tired imply that Ridley is not beige.
Someone who is eithor not automatic or tired is always petite.
Someone who is tired is always both beige and not petite.
Keene being beige and Hall being not busy imply that Hall is automatic and Ridley is blue-eyed.
If there is someone who is either automatic or busy, then Ridley is not blue-eyed. | Trevor is not blue-eyed. | neutral |
Ridley is petite.
Marvin is not automatic.
Hall is not busy.
Culver is automatic.
Tommy is not busy.
Hall is not tired.
Marvin is beige.
Tommy is petite.
Culver is not blue-eyed.
Culver is tired.
Keene is beige.
Trevor is not busy.Marvin being not blue-eyed is equivalent to Keene being busy and Hall being not automatic.
It can be concluded that Keene is not beige once knowing that Culver is not blue-eyed.
Someone who is petite is always both blue-eyed and not tired.
Someone is not beige if and only if he is blue-eyed.
If someone is beige, then he is not petite, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not busy and not automatic is always not beige.
If there is someone who is both automatic and not busy, then Hall is not petite and Tommy is beige.
Culver being petite and Culver being tired imply that Ridley is not beige.
Someone who is eithor not automatic or tired is always petite.
Someone who is tired is always both beige and not petite.
Keene being beige and Hall being not busy imply that Hall is automatic and Ridley is blue-eyed.
If there is someone who is either automatic or busy, then Ridley is not blue-eyed. | Keene is not busy. | neutral |
Ridley is petite.
Marvin is not automatic.
Hall is not busy.
Culver is automatic.
Tommy is not busy.
Hall is not tired.
Marvin is beige.
Tommy is petite.
Culver is not blue-eyed.
Culver is tired.
Keene is beige.
Trevor is not busy.Marvin being not blue-eyed is equivalent to Keene being busy and Hall being not automatic.
It can be concluded that Keene is not beige once knowing that Culver is not blue-eyed.
Someone who is petite is always both blue-eyed and not tired.
Someone is not beige if and only if he is blue-eyed.
If someone is beige, then he is not petite, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not busy and not automatic is always not beige.
If there is someone who is both automatic and not busy, then Hall is not petite and Tommy is beige.
Culver being petite and Culver being tired imply that Ridley is not beige.
Someone who is eithor not automatic or tired is always petite.
Someone who is tired is always both beige and not petite.
Keene being beige and Hall being not busy imply that Hall is automatic and Ridley is blue-eyed.
If there is someone who is either automatic or busy, then Ridley is not blue-eyed. | Marvin is not beige. | self_contradiction |
Ridley is petite.
Marvin is not automatic.
Hall is not busy.
Culver is automatic.
Tommy is not busy.
Hall is not tired.
Marvin is beige.
Tommy is petite.
Culver is not blue-eyed.
Culver is tired.
Keene is beige.
Trevor is not busy.Marvin being not blue-eyed is equivalent to Keene being busy and Hall being not automatic.
It can be concluded that Keene is not beige once knowing that Culver is not blue-eyed.
Someone who is petite is always both blue-eyed and not tired.
Someone is not beige if and only if he is blue-eyed.
If someone is beige, then he is not petite, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not busy and not automatic is always not beige.
If there is someone who is both automatic and not busy, then Hall is not petite and Tommy is beige.
Culver being petite and Culver being tired imply that Ridley is not beige.
Someone who is eithor not automatic or tired is always petite.
Someone who is tired is always both beige and not petite.
Keene being beige and Hall being not busy imply that Hall is automatic and Ridley is blue-eyed.
If there is someone who is either automatic or busy, then Ridley is not blue-eyed. | Trevor is not tired. | neutral |
Ridley is petite.
Marvin is not automatic.
Hall is not busy.
Culver is automatic.
Tommy is not busy.
Hall is not tired.
Marvin is beige.
Tommy is petite.
Culver is not blue-eyed.
Culver is tired.
Keene is beige.
Trevor is not busy.Marvin being not blue-eyed is equivalent to Keene being busy and Hall being not automatic.
It can be concluded that Keene is not beige once knowing that Culver is not blue-eyed.
Someone who is petite is always both blue-eyed and not tired.
Someone is not beige if and only if he is blue-eyed.
If someone is beige, then he is not petite, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not busy and not automatic is always not beige.
If there is someone who is both automatic and not busy, then Hall is not petite and Tommy is beige.
Culver being petite and Culver being tired imply that Ridley is not beige.
Someone who is eithor not automatic or tired is always petite.
Someone who is tired is always both beige and not petite.
Keene being beige and Hall being not busy imply that Hall is automatic and Ridley is blue-eyed.
If there is someone who is either automatic or busy, then Ridley is not blue-eyed. | Culver is automatic. | entailment |
Ridley is petite.
Marvin is not automatic.
Hall is not busy.
Culver is automatic.
Tommy is not busy.
Hall is not tired.
Marvin is beige.
Tommy is petite.
Culver is not blue-eyed.
Culver is tired.
Keene is beige.
Trevor is not busy.Marvin being not blue-eyed is equivalent to Keene being busy and Hall being not automatic.
It can be concluded that Keene is not beige once knowing that Culver is not blue-eyed.
Someone who is petite is always both blue-eyed and not tired.
Someone is not beige if and only if he is blue-eyed.
If someone is beige, then he is not petite, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not busy and not automatic is always not beige.
If there is someone who is both automatic and not busy, then Hall is not petite and Tommy is beige.
Culver being petite and Culver being tired imply that Ridley is not beige.
Someone who is eithor not automatic or tired is always petite.
Someone who is tired is always both beige and not petite.
Keene being beige and Hall being not busy imply that Hall is automatic and Ridley is blue-eyed.
If there is someone who is either automatic or busy, then Ridley is not blue-eyed. | Marvin is automatic. | contradiction |
Ridley is petite.
Marvin is not automatic.
Hall is not busy.
Culver is automatic.
Tommy is not busy.
Hall is not tired.
Marvin is beige.
Tommy is petite.
Culver is not blue-eyed.
Culver is tired.
Keene is beige.
Trevor is not busy.Marvin being not blue-eyed is equivalent to Keene being busy and Hall being not automatic.
It can be concluded that Keene is not beige once knowing that Culver is not blue-eyed.
Someone who is petite is always both blue-eyed and not tired.
Someone is not beige if and only if he is blue-eyed.
If someone is beige, then he is not petite, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not busy and not automatic is always not beige.
If there is someone who is both automatic and not busy, then Hall is not petite and Tommy is beige.
Culver being petite and Culver being tired imply that Ridley is not beige.
Someone who is eithor not automatic or tired is always petite.
Someone who is tired is always both beige and not petite.
Keene being beige and Hall being not busy imply that Hall is automatic and Ridley is blue-eyed.
If there is someone who is either automatic or busy, then Ridley is not blue-eyed. | Tommy is not petite. | contradiction |
Ridley is petite.
Marvin is not automatic.
Hall is not busy.
Culver is automatic.
Tommy is not busy.
Hall is not tired.
Marvin is beige.
Tommy is petite.
Culver is not blue-eyed.
Culver is tired.
Keene is beige.
Trevor is not busy.Marvin being not blue-eyed is equivalent to Keene being busy and Hall being not automatic.
It can be concluded that Keene is not beige once knowing that Culver is not blue-eyed.
Someone who is petite is always both blue-eyed and not tired.
Someone is not beige if and only if he is blue-eyed.
If someone is beige, then he is not petite, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not busy and not automatic is always not beige.
If there is someone who is both automatic and not busy, then Hall is not petite and Tommy is beige.
Culver being petite and Culver being tired imply that Ridley is not beige.
Someone who is eithor not automatic or tired is always petite.
Someone who is tired is always both beige and not petite.
Keene being beige and Hall being not busy imply that Hall is automatic and Ridley is blue-eyed.
If there is someone who is either automatic or busy, then Ridley is not blue-eyed. | Ridley is not tired. | entailment |
Ridley is petite.
Marvin is not automatic.
Hall is not busy.
Culver is automatic.
Tommy is not busy.
Hall is not tired.
Marvin is beige.
Tommy is petite.
Culver is not blue-eyed.
Culver is tired.
Keene is beige.
Trevor is not busy.Marvin being not blue-eyed is equivalent to Keene being busy and Hall being not automatic.
It can be concluded that Keene is not beige once knowing that Culver is not blue-eyed.
Someone who is petite is always both blue-eyed and not tired.
Someone is not beige if and only if he is blue-eyed.
If someone is beige, then he is not petite, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not busy and not automatic is always not beige.
If there is someone who is both automatic and not busy, then Hall is not petite and Tommy is beige.
Culver being petite and Culver being tired imply that Ridley is not beige.
Someone who is eithor not automatic or tired is always petite.
Someone who is tired is always both beige and not petite.
Keene being beige and Hall being not busy imply that Hall is automatic and Ridley is blue-eyed.
If there is someone who is either automatic or busy, then Ridley is not blue-eyed. | Culver is not busy. | neutral |
Ridley is petite.
Marvin is not automatic.
Hall is not busy.
Culver is automatic.
Tommy is not busy.
Hall is not tired.
Marvin is beige.
Tommy is petite.
Culver is not blue-eyed.
Culver is tired.
Keene is beige.
Trevor is not busy.Marvin being not blue-eyed is equivalent to Keene being busy and Hall being not automatic.
It can be concluded that Keene is not beige once knowing that Culver is not blue-eyed.
Someone who is petite is always both blue-eyed and not tired.
Someone is not beige if and only if he is blue-eyed.
If someone is beige, then he is not petite, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not busy and not automatic is always not beige.
If there is someone who is both automatic and not busy, then Hall is not petite and Tommy is beige.
Culver being petite and Culver being tired imply that Ridley is not beige.
Someone who is eithor not automatic or tired is always petite.
Someone who is tired is always both beige and not petite.
Keene being beige and Hall being not busy imply that Hall is automatic and Ridley is blue-eyed.
If there is someone who is either automatic or busy, then Ridley is not blue-eyed. | Trevor is blue-eyed. | neutral |
Ridley is petite.
Marvin is not automatic.
Hall is not busy.
Culver is automatic.
Tommy is not busy.
Hall is not tired.
Marvin is beige.
Tommy is petite.
Culver is not blue-eyed.
Culver is tired.
Keene is beige.
Trevor is not busy.Marvin being not blue-eyed is equivalent to Keene being busy and Hall being not automatic.
It can be concluded that Keene is not beige once knowing that Culver is not blue-eyed.
Someone who is petite is always both blue-eyed and not tired.
Someone is not beige if and only if he is blue-eyed.
If someone is beige, then he is not petite, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not busy and not automatic is always not beige.
If there is someone who is both automatic and not busy, then Hall is not petite and Tommy is beige.
Culver being petite and Culver being tired imply that Ridley is not beige.
Someone who is eithor not automatic or tired is always petite.
Someone who is tired is always both beige and not petite.
Keene being beige and Hall being not busy imply that Hall is automatic and Ridley is blue-eyed.
If there is someone who is either automatic or busy, then Ridley is not blue-eyed. | Tommy is blue-eyed. | entailment |
Ridley is petite.
Marvin is not automatic.
Hall is not busy.
Culver is automatic.
Tommy is not busy.
Hall is not tired.
Marvin is beige.
Tommy is petite.
Culver is not blue-eyed.
Culver is tired.
Keene is beige.
Trevor is not busy.Marvin being not blue-eyed is equivalent to Keene being busy and Hall being not automatic.
It can be concluded that Keene is not beige once knowing that Culver is not blue-eyed.
Someone who is petite is always both blue-eyed and not tired.
Someone is not beige if and only if he is blue-eyed.
If someone is beige, then he is not petite, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not busy and not automatic is always not beige.
If there is someone who is both automatic and not busy, then Hall is not petite and Tommy is beige.
Culver being petite and Culver being tired imply that Ridley is not beige.
Someone who is eithor not automatic or tired is always petite.
Someone who is tired is always both beige and not petite.
Keene being beige and Hall being not busy imply that Hall is automatic and Ridley is blue-eyed.
If there is someone who is either automatic or busy, then Ridley is not blue-eyed. | Trevor is busy. | contradiction |
Timothy is funny.
Chalmers is useful.
Bond is adventurous.
Clifford is not useful.
Nathalie is not united.
Clifford is not united.
Chalmers is funny.
Bond is not global.
Bond is shallow.
Timothy is useful.
Timothy is global.
Bond is united.As long as someone is funny, he is not global and adventurous.
Someone is not global if and only if he is not funny.
If there is at least one people who is both global and not united, then Clifford is shallow.
Liam being not adventurous is equivalent to Bond being not funny.
Liam being not useful and Albert being not global imply that Nathalie is adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is both not funny and global, then Chalmers is adventurous.
Someone who is both funny and useful is always not united.
If someone is not funny or he is shallow, then he is not adventurous.
If Clifford is united, then Clifford is useful and Timothy is adventurous.
Someone being both united and not shallow is equivalent to being not useful and adventurous.
Bond being not funny or Bond being not useful implies that Bond is not united.
Timothy being not funny implies that Chalmers is not adventurous. | Clifford is united. | contradiction |
Timothy is funny.
Chalmers is useful.
Bond is adventurous.
Clifford is not useful.
Nathalie is not united.
Clifford is not united.
Chalmers is funny.
Bond is not global.
Bond is shallow.
Timothy is useful.
Timothy is global.
Bond is united.As long as someone is funny, he is not global and adventurous.
Someone is not global if and only if he is not funny.
If there is at least one people who is both global and not united, then Clifford is shallow.
Liam being not adventurous is equivalent to Bond being not funny.
Liam being not useful and Albert being not global imply that Nathalie is adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is both not funny and global, then Chalmers is adventurous.
Someone who is both funny and useful is always not united.
If someone is not funny or he is shallow, then he is not adventurous.
If Clifford is united, then Clifford is useful and Timothy is adventurous.
Someone being both united and not shallow is equivalent to being not useful and adventurous.
Bond being not funny or Bond being not useful implies that Bond is not united.
Timothy being not funny implies that Chalmers is not adventurous. | Chalmers is global. | contradiction |
Timothy is funny.
Chalmers is useful.
Bond is adventurous.
Clifford is not useful.
Nathalie is not united.
Clifford is not united.
Chalmers is funny.
Bond is not global.
Bond is shallow.
Timothy is useful.
Timothy is global.
Bond is united.As long as someone is funny, he is not global and adventurous.
Someone is not global if and only if he is not funny.
If there is at least one people who is both global and not united, then Clifford is shallow.
Liam being not adventurous is equivalent to Bond being not funny.
Liam being not useful and Albert being not global imply that Nathalie is adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is both not funny and global, then Chalmers is adventurous.
Someone who is both funny and useful is always not united.
If someone is not funny or he is shallow, then he is not adventurous.
If Clifford is united, then Clifford is useful and Timothy is adventurous.
Someone being both united and not shallow is equivalent to being not useful and adventurous.
Bond being not funny or Bond being not useful implies that Bond is not united.
Timothy being not funny implies that Chalmers is not adventurous. | Chalmers is united. | contradiction |
Timothy is funny.
Chalmers is useful.
Bond is adventurous.
Clifford is not useful.
Nathalie is not united.
Clifford is not united.
Chalmers is funny.
Bond is not global.
Bond is shallow.
Timothy is useful.
Timothy is global.
Bond is united.As long as someone is funny, he is not global and adventurous.
Someone is not global if and only if he is not funny.
If there is at least one people who is both global and not united, then Clifford is shallow.
Liam being not adventurous is equivalent to Bond being not funny.
Liam being not useful and Albert being not global imply that Nathalie is adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is both not funny and global, then Chalmers is adventurous.
Someone who is both funny and useful is always not united.
If someone is not funny or he is shallow, then he is not adventurous.
If Clifford is united, then Clifford is useful and Timothy is adventurous.
Someone being both united and not shallow is equivalent to being not useful and adventurous.
Bond being not funny or Bond being not useful implies that Bond is not united.
Timothy being not funny implies that Chalmers is not adventurous. | Liam is not adventurous. | entailment |
Timothy is funny.
Chalmers is useful.
Bond is adventurous.
Clifford is not useful.
Nathalie is not united.
Clifford is not united.
Chalmers is funny.
Bond is not global.
Bond is shallow.
Timothy is useful.
Timothy is global.
Bond is united.As long as someone is funny, he is not global and adventurous.
Someone is not global if and only if he is not funny.
If there is at least one people who is both global and not united, then Clifford is shallow.
Liam being not adventurous is equivalent to Bond being not funny.
Liam being not useful and Albert being not global imply that Nathalie is adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is both not funny and global, then Chalmers is adventurous.
Someone who is both funny and useful is always not united.
If someone is not funny or he is shallow, then he is not adventurous.
If Clifford is united, then Clifford is useful and Timothy is adventurous.
Someone being both united and not shallow is equivalent to being not useful and adventurous.
Bond being not funny or Bond being not useful implies that Bond is not united.
Timothy being not funny implies that Chalmers is not adventurous. | Albert is united. | neutral |
Timothy is funny.
Chalmers is useful.
Bond is adventurous.
Clifford is not useful.
Nathalie is not united.
Clifford is not united.
Chalmers is funny.
Bond is not global.
Bond is shallow.
Timothy is useful.
Timothy is global.
Bond is united.As long as someone is funny, he is not global and adventurous.
Someone is not global if and only if he is not funny.
If there is at least one people who is both global and not united, then Clifford is shallow.
Liam being not adventurous is equivalent to Bond being not funny.
Liam being not useful and Albert being not global imply that Nathalie is adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is both not funny and global, then Chalmers is adventurous.
Someone who is both funny and useful is always not united.
If someone is not funny or he is shallow, then he is not adventurous.
If Clifford is united, then Clifford is useful and Timothy is adventurous.
Someone being both united and not shallow is equivalent to being not useful and adventurous.
Bond being not funny or Bond being not useful implies that Bond is not united.
Timothy being not funny implies that Chalmers is not adventurous. | Chalmers is not useful. | contradiction |
Timothy is funny.
Chalmers is useful.
Bond is adventurous.
Clifford is not useful.
Nathalie is not united.
Clifford is not united.
Chalmers is funny.
Bond is not global.
Bond is shallow.
Timothy is useful.
Timothy is global.
Bond is united.As long as someone is funny, he is not global and adventurous.
Someone is not global if and only if he is not funny.
If there is at least one people who is both global and not united, then Clifford is shallow.
Liam being not adventurous is equivalent to Bond being not funny.
Liam being not useful and Albert being not global imply that Nathalie is adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is both not funny and global, then Chalmers is adventurous.
Someone who is both funny and useful is always not united.
If someone is not funny or he is shallow, then he is not adventurous.
If Clifford is united, then Clifford is useful and Timothy is adventurous.
Someone being both united and not shallow is equivalent to being not useful and adventurous.
Bond being not funny or Bond being not useful implies that Bond is not united.
Timothy being not funny implies that Chalmers is not adventurous. | Chalmers is not united. | entailment |
Timothy is funny.
Chalmers is useful.
Bond is adventurous.
Clifford is not useful.
Nathalie is not united.
Clifford is not united.
Chalmers is funny.
Bond is not global.
Bond is shallow.
Timothy is useful.
Timothy is global.
Bond is united.As long as someone is funny, he is not global and adventurous.
Someone is not global if and only if he is not funny.
If there is at least one people who is both global and not united, then Clifford is shallow.
Liam being not adventurous is equivalent to Bond being not funny.
Liam being not useful and Albert being not global imply that Nathalie is adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is both not funny and global, then Chalmers is adventurous.
Someone who is both funny and useful is always not united.
If someone is not funny or he is shallow, then he is not adventurous.
If Clifford is united, then Clifford is useful and Timothy is adventurous.
Someone being both united and not shallow is equivalent to being not useful and adventurous.
Bond being not funny or Bond being not useful implies that Bond is not united.
Timothy being not funny implies that Chalmers is not adventurous. | Bond is not adventurous. | self_contradiction |
Timothy is funny.
Chalmers is useful.
Bond is adventurous.
Clifford is not useful.
Nathalie is not united.
Clifford is not united.
Chalmers is funny.
Bond is not global.
Bond is shallow.
Timothy is useful.
Timothy is global.
Bond is united.As long as someone is funny, he is not global and adventurous.
Someone is not global if and only if he is not funny.
If there is at least one people who is both global and not united, then Clifford is shallow.
Liam being not adventurous is equivalent to Bond being not funny.
Liam being not useful and Albert being not global imply that Nathalie is adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is both not funny and global, then Chalmers is adventurous.
Someone who is both funny and useful is always not united.
If someone is not funny or he is shallow, then he is not adventurous.
If Clifford is united, then Clifford is useful and Timothy is adventurous.
Someone being both united and not shallow is equivalent to being not useful and adventurous.
Bond being not funny or Bond being not useful implies that Bond is not united.
Timothy being not funny implies that Chalmers is not adventurous. | Bond is not useful. | neutral |
Timothy is funny.
Chalmers is useful.
Bond is adventurous.
Clifford is not useful.
Nathalie is not united.
Clifford is not united.
Chalmers is funny.
Bond is not global.
Bond is shallow.
Timothy is useful.
Timothy is global.
Bond is united.As long as someone is funny, he is not global and adventurous.
Someone is not global if and only if he is not funny.
If there is at least one people who is both global and not united, then Clifford is shallow.
Liam being not adventurous is equivalent to Bond being not funny.
Liam being not useful and Albert being not global imply that Nathalie is adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is both not funny and global, then Chalmers is adventurous.
Someone who is both funny and useful is always not united.
If someone is not funny or he is shallow, then he is not adventurous.
If Clifford is united, then Clifford is useful and Timothy is adventurous.
Someone being both united and not shallow is equivalent to being not useful and adventurous.
Bond being not funny or Bond being not useful implies that Bond is not united.
Timothy being not funny implies that Chalmers is not adventurous. | Nathalie is not useful. | neutral |
Timothy is funny.
Chalmers is useful.
Bond is adventurous.
Clifford is not useful.
Nathalie is not united.
Clifford is not united.
Chalmers is funny.
Bond is not global.
Bond is shallow.
Timothy is useful.
Timothy is global.
Bond is united.As long as someone is funny, he is not global and adventurous.
Someone is not global if and only if he is not funny.
If there is at least one people who is both global and not united, then Clifford is shallow.
Liam being not adventurous is equivalent to Bond being not funny.
Liam being not useful and Albert being not global imply that Nathalie is adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is both not funny and global, then Chalmers is adventurous.
Someone who is both funny and useful is always not united.
If someone is not funny or he is shallow, then he is not adventurous.
If Clifford is united, then Clifford is useful and Timothy is adventurous.
Someone being both united and not shallow is equivalent to being not useful and adventurous.
Bond being not funny or Bond being not useful implies that Bond is not united.
Timothy being not funny implies that Chalmers is not adventurous. | Bond is not shallow. | contradiction |
Timothy is funny.
Chalmers is useful.
Bond is adventurous.
Clifford is not useful.
Nathalie is not united.
Clifford is not united.
Chalmers is funny.
Bond is not global.
Bond is shallow.
Timothy is useful.
Timothy is global.
Bond is united.As long as someone is funny, he is not global and adventurous.
Someone is not global if and only if he is not funny.
If there is at least one people who is both global and not united, then Clifford is shallow.
Liam being not adventurous is equivalent to Bond being not funny.
Liam being not useful and Albert being not global imply that Nathalie is adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is both not funny and global, then Chalmers is adventurous.
Someone who is both funny and useful is always not united.
If someone is not funny or he is shallow, then he is not adventurous.
If Clifford is united, then Clifford is useful and Timothy is adventurous.
Someone being both united and not shallow is equivalent to being not useful and adventurous.
Bond being not funny or Bond being not useful implies that Bond is not united.
Timothy being not funny implies that Chalmers is not adventurous. | Nathalie is adventurous. | neutral |
Timothy is funny.
Chalmers is useful.
Bond is adventurous.
Clifford is not useful.
Nathalie is not united.
Clifford is not united.
Chalmers is funny.
Bond is not global.
Bond is shallow.
Timothy is useful.
Timothy is global.
Bond is united.As long as someone is funny, he is not global and adventurous.
Someone is not global if and only if he is not funny.
If there is at least one people who is both global and not united, then Clifford is shallow.
Liam being not adventurous is equivalent to Bond being not funny.
Liam being not useful and Albert being not global imply that Nathalie is adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is both not funny and global, then Chalmers is adventurous.
Someone who is both funny and useful is always not united.
If someone is not funny or he is shallow, then he is not adventurous.
If Clifford is united, then Clifford is useful and Timothy is adventurous.
Someone being both united and not shallow is equivalent to being not useful and adventurous.
Bond being not funny or Bond being not useful implies that Bond is not united.
Timothy being not funny implies that Chalmers is not adventurous. | Timothy is not united. | entailment |
Timothy is funny.
Chalmers is useful.
Bond is adventurous.
Clifford is not useful.
Nathalie is not united.
Clifford is not united.
Chalmers is funny.
Bond is not global.
Bond is shallow.
Timothy is useful.
Timothy is global.
Bond is united.As long as someone is funny, he is not global and adventurous.
Someone is not global if and only if he is not funny.
If there is at least one people who is both global and not united, then Clifford is shallow.
Liam being not adventurous is equivalent to Bond being not funny.
Liam being not useful and Albert being not global imply that Nathalie is adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is both not funny and global, then Chalmers is adventurous.
Someone who is both funny and useful is always not united.
If someone is not funny or he is shallow, then he is not adventurous.
If Clifford is united, then Clifford is useful and Timothy is adventurous.
Someone being both united and not shallow is equivalent to being not useful and adventurous.
Bond being not funny or Bond being not useful implies that Bond is not united.
Timothy being not funny implies that Chalmers is not adventurous. | Chalmers is adventurous. | self_contradiction |
Timothy is funny.
Chalmers is useful.
Bond is adventurous.
Clifford is not useful.
Nathalie is not united.
Clifford is not united.
Chalmers is funny.
Bond is not global.
Bond is shallow.
Timothy is useful.
Timothy is global.
Bond is united.As long as someone is funny, he is not global and adventurous.
Someone is not global if and only if he is not funny.
If there is at least one people who is both global and not united, then Clifford is shallow.
Liam being not adventurous is equivalent to Bond being not funny.
Liam being not useful and Albert being not global imply that Nathalie is adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is both not funny and global, then Chalmers is adventurous.
Someone who is both funny and useful is always not united.
If someone is not funny or he is shallow, then he is not adventurous.
If Clifford is united, then Clifford is useful and Timothy is adventurous.
Someone being both united and not shallow is equivalent to being not useful and adventurous.
Bond being not funny or Bond being not useful implies that Bond is not united.
Timothy being not funny implies that Chalmers is not adventurous. | Chalmers is not funny. | self_contradiction |
Timothy is funny.
Chalmers is useful.
Bond is adventurous.
Clifford is not useful.
Nathalie is not united.
Clifford is not united.
Chalmers is funny.
Bond is not global.
Bond is shallow.
Timothy is useful.
Timothy is global.
Bond is united.As long as someone is funny, he is not global and adventurous.
Someone is not global if and only if he is not funny.
If there is at least one people who is both global and not united, then Clifford is shallow.
Liam being not adventurous is equivalent to Bond being not funny.
Liam being not useful and Albert being not global imply that Nathalie is adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is both not funny and global, then Chalmers is adventurous.
Someone who is both funny and useful is always not united.
If someone is not funny or he is shallow, then he is not adventurous.
If Clifford is united, then Clifford is useful and Timothy is adventurous.
Someone being both united and not shallow is equivalent to being not useful and adventurous.
Bond being not funny or Bond being not useful implies that Bond is not united.
Timothy being not funny implies that Chalmers is not adventurous. | Liam is shallow. | neutral |
Timothy is funny.
Chalmers is useful.
Bond is adventurous.
Clifford is not useful.
Nathalie is not united.
Clifford is not united.
Chalmers is funny.
Bond is not global.
Bond is shallow.
Timothy is useful.
Timothy is global.
Bond is united.As long as someone is funny, he is not global and adventurous.
Someone is not global if and only if he is not funny.
If there is at least one people who is both global and not united, then Clifford is shallow.
Liam being not adventurous is equivalent to Bond being not funny.
Liam being not useful and Albert being not global imply that Nathalie is adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is both not funny and global, then Chalmers is adventurous.
Someone who is both funny and useful is always not united.
If someone is not funny or he is shallow, then he is not adventurous.
If Clifford is united, then Clifford is useful and Timothy is adventurous.
Someone being both united and not shallow is equivalent to being not useful and adventurous.
Bond being not funny or Bond being not useful implies that Bond is not united.
Timothy being not funny implies that Chalmers is not adventurous. | Chalmers is useful. | entailment |
Timothy is funny.
Chalmers is useful.
Bond is adventurous.
Clifford is not useful.
Nathalie is not united.
Clifford is not united.
Chalmers is funny.
Bond is not global.
Bond is shallow.
Timothy is useful.
Timothy is global.
Bond is united.As long as someone is funny, he is not global and adventurous.
Someone is not global if and only if he is not funny.
If there is at least one people who is both global and not united, then Clifford is shallow.
Liam being not adventurous is equivalent to Bond being not funny.
Liam being not useful and Albert being not global imply that Nathalie is adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is both not funny and global, then Chalmers is adventurous.
Someone who is both funny and useful is always not united.
If someone is not funny or he is shallow, then he is not adventurous.
If Clifford is united, then Clifford is useful and Timothy is adventurous.
Someone being both united and not shallow is equivalent to being not useful and adventurous.
Bond being not funny or Bond being not useful implies that Bond is not united.
Timothy being not funny implies that Chalmers is not adventurous. | Chalmers is funny. | self_contradiction |
Timothy is funny.
Chalmers is useful.
Bond is adventurous.
Clifford is not useful.
Nathalie is not united.
Clifford is not united.
Chalmers is funny.
Bond is not global.
Bond is shallow.
Timothy is useful.
Timothy is global.
Bond is united.As long as someone is funny, he is not global and adventurous.
Someone is not global if and only if he is not funny.
If there is at least one people who is both global and not united, then Clifford is shallow.
Liam being not adventurous is equivalent to Bond being not funny.
Liam being not useful and Albert being not global imply that Nathalie is adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is both not funny and global, then Chalmers is adventurous.
Someone who is both funny and useful is always not united.
If someone is not funny or he is shallow, then he is not adventurous.
If Clifford is united, then Clifford is useful and Timothy is adventurous.
Someone being both united and not shallow is equivalent to being not useful and adventurous.
Bond being not funny or Bond being not useful implies that Bond is not united.
Timothy being not funny implies that Chalmers is not adventurous. | Bond is adventurous. | self_contradiction |
Timothy is funny.
Chalmers is useful.
Bond is adventurous.
Clifford is not useful.
Nathalie is not united.
Clifford is not united.
Chalmers is funny.
Bond is not global.
Bond is shallow.
Timothy is useful.
Timothy is global.
Bond is united.As long as someone is funny, he is not global and adventurous.
Someone is not global if and only if he is not funny.
If there is at least one people who is both global and not united, then Clifford is shallow.
Liam being not adventurous is equivalent to Bond being not funny.
Liam being not useful and Albert being not global imply that Nathalie is adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is both not funny and global, then Chalmers is adventurous.
Someone who is both funny and useful is always not united.
If someone is not funny or he is shallow, then he is not adventurous.
If Clifford is united, then Clifford is useful and Timothy is adventurous.
Someone being both united and not shallow is equivalent to being not useful and adventurous.
Bond being not funny or Bond being not useful implies that Bond is not united.
Timothy being not funny implies that Chalmers is not adventurous. | Chalmers is not global. | entailment |
Marion is handsome.
Trevor is modern.
Gilbert is not every.
Trevor is important.
Phoebe is hungry.
Phoebe is handsome.
Jerry is handsome.
Gifford is not handsome.
Gifford is gentle.
Hector is not important.
Marion is not gentle.
Gilbert is gentle.It can be concluded that Gilbert is handsome and Jerry is modern once knowing that Hector is not gentle.
If there is at least one people who is not gentle, then Marion is hungry and Hector is not important.
Someone being every is equivalent to being handsome.
If there is at least one people who is both not hungry and every, then Trevor is modern.
If someone is not modern and gentle, then he is not every and not hungry.
Someone is handsome and not hungry if and only if he is modern and important.
It can be concluded that Hector is gentle once knowing that Marion is not every and Phoebe is important.
It can be concluded that Hector is not every once knowing that Marion is not gentle.
Someone who is both gentle and not hungry is always not modern.
Jerry is modern if and only if Gilbert is handsome and Hector is hungry.
As long as someone is not handsome, he is modern and not gentle.
If there is someone who is not gentle, then Hector is handsome and Marion is not hungry. | Hector is not every. | self_contradiction |
Marion is handsome.
Trevor is modern.
Gilbert is not every.
Trevor is important.
Phoebe is hungry.
Phoebe is handsome.
Jerry is handsome.
Gifford is not handsome.
Gifford is gentle.
Hector is not important.
Marion is not gentle.
Gilbert is gentle.It can be concluded that Gilbert is handsome and Jerry is modern once knowing that Hector is not gentle.
If there is at least one people who is not gentle, then Marion is hungry and Hector is not important.
Someone being every is equivalent to being handsome.
If there is at least one people who is both not hungry and every, then Trevor is modern.
If someone is not modern and gentle, then he is not every and not hungry.
Someone is handsome and not hungry if and only if he is modern and important.
It can be concluded that Hector is gentle once knowing that Marion is not every and Phoebe is important.
It can be concluded that Hector is not every once knowing that Marion is not gentle.
Someone who is both gentle and not hungry is always not modern.
Jerry is modern if and only if Gilbert is handsome and Hector is hungry.
As long as someone is not handsome, he is modern and not gentle.
If there is someone who is not gentle, then Hector is handsome and Marion is not hungry. | Jerry is not handsome. | contradiction |
Marion is handsome.
Trevor is modern.
Gilbert is not every.
Trevor is important.
Phoebe is hungry.
Phoebe is handsome.
Jerry is handsome.
Gifford is not handsome.
Gifford is gentle.
Hector is not important.
Marion is not gentle.
Gilbert is gentle.It can be concluded that Gilbert is handsome and Jerry is modern once knowing that Hector is not gentle.
If there is at least one people who is not gentle, then Marion is hungry and Hector is not important.
Someone being every is equivalent to being handsome.
If there is at least one people who is both not hungry and every, then Trevor is modern.
If someone is not modern and gentle, then he is not every and not hungry.
Someone is handsome and not hungry if and only if he is modern and important.
It can be concluded that Hector is gentle once knowing that Marion is not every and Phoebe is important.
It can be concluded that Hector is not every once knowing that Marion is not gentle.
Someone who is both gentle and not hungry is always not modern.
Jerry is modern if and only if Gilbert is handsome and Hector is hungry.
As long as someone is not handsome, he is modern and not gentle.
If there is someone who is not gentle, then Hector is handsome and Marion is not hungry. | Gilbert is important. | neutral |
Marion is handsome.
Trevor is modern.
Gilbert is not every.
Trevor is important.
Phoebe is hungry.
Phoebe is handsome.
Jerry is handsome.
Gifford is not handsome.
Gifford is gentle.
Hector is not important.
Marion is not gentle.
Gilbert is gentle.It can be concluded that Gilbert is handsome and Jerry is modern once knowing that Hector is not gentle.
If there is at least one people who is not gentle, then Marion is hungry and Hector is not important.
Someone being every is equivalent to being handsome.
If there is at least one people who is both not hungry and every, then Trevor is modern.
If someone is not modern and gentle, then he is not every and not hungry.
Someone is handsome and not hungry if and only if he is modern and important.
It can be concluded that Hector is gentle once knowing that Marion is not every and Phoebe is important.
It can be concluded that Hector is not every once knowing that Marion is not gentle.
Someone who is both gentle and not hungry is always not modern.
Jerry is modern if and only if Gilbert is handsome and Hector is hungry.
As long as someone is not handsome, he is modern and not gentle.
If there is someone who is not gentle, then Hector is handsome and Marion is not hungry. | Trevor is every. | entailment |
Marion is handsome.
Trevor is modern.
Gilbert is not every.
Trevor is important.
Phoebe is hungry.
Phoebe is handsome.
Jerry is handsome.
Gifford is not handsome.
Gifford is gentle.
Hector is not important.
Marion is not gentle.
Gilbert is gentle.It can be concluded that Gilbert is handsome and Jerry is modern once knowing that Hector is not gentle.
If there is at least one people who is not gentle, then Marion is hungry and Hector is not important.
Someone being every is equivalent to being handsome.
If there is at least one people who is both not hungry and every, then Trevor is modern.
If someone is not modern and gentle, then he is not every and not hungry.
Someone is handsome and not hungry if and only if he is modern and important.
It can be concluded that Hector is gentle once knowing that Marion is not every and Phoebe is important.
It can be concluded that Hector is not every once knowing that Marion is not gentle.
Someone who is both gentle and not hungry is always not modern.
Jerry is modern if and only if Gilbert is handsome and Hector is hungry.
As long as someone is not handsome, he is modern and not gentle.
If there is someone who is not gentle, then Hector is handsome and Marion is not hungry. | Marion is not modern. | contradiction |
Marion is handsome.
Trevor is modern.
Gilbert is not every.
Trevor is important.
Phoebe is hungry.
Phoebe is handsome.
Jerry is handsome.
Gifford is not handsome.
Gifford is gentle.
Hector is not important.
Marion is not gentle.
Gilbert is gentle.It can be concluded that Gilbert is handsome and Jerry is modern once knowing that Hector is not gentle.
If there is at least one people who is not gentle, then Marion is hungry and Hector is not important.
Someone being every is equivalent to being handsome.
If there is at least one people who is both not hungry and every, then Trevor is modern.
If someone is not modern and gentle, then he is not every and not hungry.
Someone is handsome and not hungry if and only if he is modern and important.
It can be concluded that Hector is gentle once knowing that Marion is not every and Phoebe is important.
It can be concluded that Hector is not every once knowing that Marion is not gentle.
Someone who is both gentle and not hungry is always not modern.
Jerry is modern if and only if Gilbert is handsome and Hector is hungry.
As long as someone is not handsome, he is modern and not gentle.
If there is someone who is not gentle, then Hector is handsome and Marion is not hungry. | Trevor is not modern. | contradiction |
Marion is handsome.
Trevor is modern.
Gilbert is not every.
Trevor is important.
Phoebe is hungry.
Phoebe is handsome.
Jerry is handsome.
Gifford is not handsome.
Gifford is gentle.
Hector is not important.
Marion is not gentle.
Gilbert is gentle.It can be concluded that Gilbert is handsome and Jerry is modern once knowing that Hector is not gentle.
If there is at least one people who is not gentle, then Marion is hungry and Hector is not important.
Someone being every is equivalent to being handsome.
If there is at least one people who is both not hungry and every, then Trevor is modern.
If someone is not modern and gentle, then he is not every and not hungry.
Someone is handsome and not hungry if and only if he is modern and important.
It can be concluded that Hector is gentle once knowing that Marion is not every and Phoebe is important.
It can be concluded that Hector is not every once knowing that Marion is not gentle.
Someone who is both gentle and not hungry is always not modern.
Jerry is modern if and only if Gilbert is handsome and Hector is hungry.
As long as someone is not handsome, he is modern and not gentle.
If there is someone who is not gentle, then Hector is handsome and Marion is not hungry. | Hector is not handsome. | contradiction |
Marion is handsome.
Trevor is modern.
Gilbert is not every.
Trevor is important.
Phoebe is hungry.
Phoebe is handsome.
Jerry is handsome.
Gifford is not handsome.
Gifford is gentle.
Hector is not important.
Marion is not gentle.
Gilbert is gentle.It can be concluded that Gilbert is handsome and Jerry is modern once knowing that Hector is not gentle.
If there is at least one people who is not gentle, then Marion is hungry and Hector is not important.
Someone being every is equivalent to being handsome.
If there is at least one people who is both not hungry and every, then Trevor is modern.
If someone is not modern and gentle, then he is not every and not hungry.
Someone is handsome and not hungry if and only if he is modern and important.
It can be concluded that Hector is gentle once knowing that Marion is not every and Phoebe is important.
It can be concluded that Hector is not every once knowing that Marion is not gentle.
Someone who is both gentle and not hungry is always not modern.
Jerry is modern if and only if Gilbert is handsome and Hector is hungry.
As long as someone is not handsome, he is modern and not gentle.
If there is someone who is not gentle, then Hector is handsome and Marion is not hungry. | Trevor is modern. | entailment |
Marion is handsome.
Trevor is modern.
Gilbert is not every.
Trevor is important.
Phoebe is hungry.
Phoebe is handsome.
Jerry is handsome.
Gifford is not handsome.
Gifford is gentle.
Hector is not important.
Marion is not gentle.
Gilbert is gentle.It can be concluded that Gilbert is handsome and Jerry is modern once knowing that Hector is not gentle.
If there is at least one people who is not gentle, then Marion is hungry and Hector is not important.
Someone being every is equivalent to being handsome.
If there is at least one people who is both not hungry and every, then Trevor is modern.
If someone is not modern and gentle, then he is not every and not hungry.
Someone is handsome and not hungry if and only if he is modern and important.
It can be concluded that Hector is gentle once knowing that Marion is not every and Phoebe is important.
It can be concluded that Hector is not every once knowing that Marion is not gentle.
Someone who is both gentle and not hungry is always not modern.
Jerry is modern if and only if Gilbert is handsome and Hector is hungry.
As long as someone is not handsome, he is modern and not gentle.
If there is someone who is not gentle, then Hector is handsome and Marion is not hungry. | Marion is not hungry. | self_contradiction |
Marion is handsome.
Trevor is modern.
Gilbert is not every.
Trevor is important.
Phoebe is hungry.
Phoebe is handsome.
Jerry is handsome.
Gifford is not handsome.
Gifford is gentle.
Hector is not important.
Marion is not gentle.
Gilbert is gentle.It can be concluded that Gilbert is handsome and Jerry is modern once knowing that Hector is not gentle.
If there is at least one people who is not gentle, then Marion is hungry and Hector is not important.
Someone being every is equivalent to being handsome.
If there is at least one people who is both not hungry and every, then Trevor is modern.
If someone is not modern and gentle, then he is not every and not hungry.
Someone is handsome and not hungry if and only if he is modern and important.
It can be concluded that Hector is gentle once knowing that Marion is not every and Phoebe is important.
It can be concluded that Hector is not every once knowing that Marion is not gentle.
Someone who is both gentle and not hungry is always not modern.
Jerry is modern if and only if Gilbert is handsome and Hector is hungry.
As long as someone is not handsome, he is modern and not gentle.
If there is someone who is not gentle, then Hector is handsome and Marion is not hungry. | Hector is hungry. | neutral |
Marion is handsome.
Trevor is modern.
Gilbert is not every.
Trevor is important.
Phoebe is hungry.
Phoebe is handsome.
Jerry is handsome.
Gifford is not handsome.
Gifford is gentle.
Hector is not important.
Marion is not gentle.
Gilbert is gentle.It can be concluded that Gilbert is handsome and Jerry is modern once knowing that Hector is not gentle.
If there is at least one people who is not gentle, then Marion is hungry and Hector is not important.
Someone being every is equivalent to being handsome.
If there is at least one people who is both not hungry and every, then Trevor is modern.
If someone is not modern and gentle, then he is not every and not hungry.
Someone is handsome and not hungry if and only if he is modern and important.
It can be concluded that Hector is gentle once knowing that Marion is not every and Phoebe is important.
It can be concluded that Hector is not every once knowing that Marion is not gentle.
Someone who is both gentle and not hungry is always not modern.
Jerry is modern if and only if Gilbert is handsome and Hector is hungry.
As long as someone is not handsome, he is modern and not gentle.
If there is someone who is not gentle, then Hector is handsome and Marion is not hungry. | Gifford is modern. | entailment |
Marion is handsome.
Trevor is modern.
Gilbert is not every.
Trevor is important.
Phoebe is hungry.
Phoebe is handsome.
Jerry is handsome.
Gifford is not handsome.
Gifford is gentle.
Hector is not important.
Marion is not gentle.
Gilbert is gentle.It can be concluded that Gilbert is handsome and Jerry is modern once knowing that Hector is not gentle.
If there is at least one people who is not gentle, then Marion is hungry and Hector is not important.
Someone being every is equivalent to being handsome.
If there is at least one people who is both not hungry and every, then Trevor is modern.
If someone is not modern and gentle, then he is not every and not hungry.
Someone is handsome and not hungry if and only if he is modern and important.
It can be concluded that Hector is gentle once knowing that Marion is not every and Phoebe is important.
It can be concluded that Hector is not every once knowing that Marion is not gentle.
Someone who is both gentle and not hungry is always not modern.
Jerry is modern if and only if Gilbert is handsome and Hector is hungry.
As long as someone is not handsome, he is modern and not gentle.
If there is someone who is not gentle, then Hector is handsome and Marion is not hungry. | Trevor is not every. | contradiction |
Marion is handsome.
Trevor is modern.
Gilbert is not every.
Trevor is important.
Phoebe is hungry.
Phoebe is handsome.
Jerry is handsome.
Gifford is not handsome.
Gifford is gentle.
Hector is not important.
Marion is not gentle.
Gilbert is gentle.It can be concluded that Gilbert is handsome and Jerry is modern once knowing that Hector is not gentle.
If there is at least one people who is not gentle, then Marion is hungry and Hector is not important.
Someone being every is equivalent to being handsome.
If there is at least one people who is both not hungry and every, then Trevor is modern.
If someone is not modern and gentle, then he is not every and not hungry.
Someone is handsome and not hungry if and only if he is modern and important.
It can be concluded that Hector is gentle once knowing that Marion is not every and Phoebe is important.
It can be concluded that Hector is not every once knowing that Marion is not gentle.
Someone who is both gentle and not hungry is always not modern.
Jerry is modern if and only if Gilbert is handsome and Hector is hungry.
As long as someone is not handsome, he is modern and not gentle.
If there is someone who is not gentle, then Hector is handsome and Marion is not hungry. | Hector is not hungry. | neutral |
Marion is handsome.
Trevor is modern.
Gilbert is not every.
Trevor is important.
Phoebe is hungry.
Phoebe is handsome.
Jerry is handsome.
Gifford is not handsome.
Gifford is gentle.
Hector is not important.
Marion is not gentle.
Gilbert is gentle.It can be concluded that Gilbert is handsome and Jerry is modern once knowing that Hector is not gentle.
If there is at least one people who is not gentle, then Marion is hungry and Hector is not important.
Someone being every is equivalent to being handsome.
If there is at least one people who is both not hungry and every, then Trevor is modern.
If someone is not modern and gentle, then he is not every and not hungry.
Someone is handsome and not hungry if and only if he is modern and important.
It can be concluded that Hector is gentle once knowing that Marion is not every and Phoebe is important.
It can be concluded that Hector is not every once knowing that Marion is not gentle.
Someone who is both gentle and not hungry is always not modern.
Jerry is modern if and only if Gilbert is handsome and Hector is hungry.
As long as someone is not handsome, he is modern and not gentle.
If there is someone who is not gentle, then Hector is handsome and Marion is not hungry. | Hector is every. | self_contradiction |
Marion is handsome.
Trevor is modern.
Gilbert is not every.
Trevor is important.
Phoebe is hungry.
Phoebe is handsome.
Jerry is handsome.
Gifford is not handsome.
Gifford is gentle.
Hector is not important.
Marion is not gentle.
Gilbert is gentle.It can be concluded that Gilbert is handsome and Jerry is modern once knowing that Hector is not gentle.
If there is at least one people who is not gentle, then Marion is hungry and Hector is not important.
Someone being every is equivalent to being handsome.
If there is at least one people who is both not hungry and every, then Trevor is modern.
If someone is not modern and gentle, then he is not every and not hungry.
Someone is handsome and not hungry if and only if he is modern and important.
It can be concluded that Hector is gentle once knowing that Marion is not every and Phoebe is important.
It can be concluded that Hector is not every once knowing that Marion is not gentle.
Someone who is both gentle and not hungry is always not modern.
Jerry is modern if and only if Gilbert is handsome and Hector is hungry.
As long as someone is not handsome, he is modern and not gentle.
If there is someone who is not gentle, then Hector is handsome and Marion is not hungry. | Gifford is not gentle. | self_contradiction |
Marion is handsome.
Trevor is modern.
Gilbert is not every.
Trevor is important.
Phoebe is hungry.
Phoebe is handsome.
Jerry is handsome.
Gifford is not handsome.
Gifford is gentle.
Hector is not important.
Marion is not gentle.
Gilbert is gentle.It can be concluded that Gilbert is handsome and Jerry is modern once knowing that Hector is not gentle.
If there is at least one people who is not gentle, then Marion is hungry and Hector is not important.
Someone being every is equivalent to being handsome.
If there is at least one people who is both not hungry and every, then Trevor is modern.
If someone is not modern and gentle, then he is not every and not hungry.
Someone is handsome and not hungry if and only if he is modern and important.
It can be concluded that Hector is gentle once knowing that Marion is not every and Phoebe is important.
It can be concluded that Hector is not every once knowing that Marion is not gentle.
Someone who is both gentle and not hungry is always not modern.
Jerry is modern if and only if Gilbert is handsome and Hector is hungry.
As long as someone is not handsome, he is modern and not gentle.
If there is someone who is not gentle, then Hector is handsome and Marion is not hungry. | Phoebe is modern. | neutral |
Marion is handsome.
Trevor is modern.
Gilbert is not every.
Trevor is important.
Phoebe is hungry.
Phoebe is handsome.
Jerry is handsome.
Gifford is not handsome.
Gifford is gentle.
Hector is not important.
Marion is not gentle.
Gilbert is gentle.It can be concluded that Gilbert is handsome and Jerry is modern once knowing that Hector is not gentle.
If there is at least one people who is not gentle, then Marion is hungry and Hector is not important.
Someone being every is equivalent to being handsome.
If there is at least one people who is both not hungry and every, then Trevor is modern.
If someone is not modern and gentle, then he is not every and not hungry.
Someone is handsome and not hungry if and only if he is modern and important.
It can be concluded that Hector is gentle once knowing that Marion is not every and Phoebe is important.
It can be concluded that Hector is not every once knowing that Marion is not gentle.
Someone who is both gentle and not hungry is always not modern.
Jerry is modern if and only if Gilbert is handsome and Hector is hungry.
As long as someone is not handsome, he is modern and not gentle.
If there is someone who is not gentle, then Hector is handsome and Marion is not hungry. | Hector is not important. | entailment |
Marion is handsome.
Trevor is modern.
Gilbert is not every.
Trevor is important.
Phoebe is hungry.
Phoebe is handsome.
Jerry is handsome.
Gifford is not handsome.
Gifford is gentle.
Hector is not important.
Marion is not gentle.
Gilbert is gentle.It can be concluded that Gilbert is handsome and Jerry is modern once knowing that Hector is not gentle.
If there is at least one people who is not gentle, then Marion is hungry and Hector is not important.
Someone being every is equivalent to being handsome.
If there is at least one people who is both not hungry and every, then Trevor is modern.
If someone is not modern and gentle, then he is not every and not hungry.
Someone is handsome and not hungry if and only if he is modern and important.
It can be concluded that Hector is gentle once knowing that Marion is not every and Phoebe is important.
It can be concluded that Hector is not every once knowing that Marion is not gentle.
Someone who is both gentle and not hungry is always not modern.
Jerry is modern if and only if Gilbert is handsome and Hector is hungry.
As long as someone is not handsome, he is modern and not gentle.
If there is someone who is not gentle, then Hector is handsome and Marion is not hungry. | Marion is not gentle. | entailment |
Marion is handsome.
Trevor is modern.
Gilbert is not every.
Trevor is important.
Phoebe is hungry.
Phoebe is handsome.
Jerry is handsome.
Gifford is not handsome.
Gifford is gentle.
Hector is not important.
Marion is not gentle.
Gilbert is gentle.It can be concluded that Gilbert is handsome and Jerry is modern once knowing that Hector is not gentle.
If there is at least one people who is not gentle, then Marion is hungry and Hector is not important.
Someone being every is equivalent to being handsome.
If there is at least one people who is both not hungry and every, then Trevor is modern.
If someone is not modern and gentle, then he is not every and not hungry.
Someone is handsome and not hungry if and only if he is modern and important.
It can be concluded that Hector is gentle once knowing that Marion is not every and Phoebe is important.
It can be concluded that Hector is not every once knowing that Marion is not gentle.
Someone who is both gentle and not hungry is always not modern.
Jerry is modern if and only if Gilbert is handsome and Hector is hungry.
As long as someone is not handsome, he is modern and not gentle.
If there is someone who is not gentle, then Hector is handsome and Marion is not hungry. | Marion is hungry. | self_contradiction |
Marion is handsome.
Trevor is modern.
Gilbert is not every.
Trevor is important.
Phoebe is hungry.
Phoebe is handsome.
Jerry is handsome.
Gifford is not handsome.
Gifford is gentle.
Hector is not important.
Marion is not gentle.
Gilbert is gentle.It can be concluded that Gilbert is handsome and Jerry is modern once knowing that Hector is not gentle.
If there is at least one people who is not gentle, then Marion is hungry and Hector is not important.
Someone being every is equivalent to being handsome.
If there is at least one people who is both not hungry and every, then Trevor is modern.
If someone is not modern and gentle, then he is not every and not hungry.
Someone is handsome and not hungry if and only if he is modern and important.
It can be concluded that Hector is gentle once knowing that Marion is not every and Phoebe is important.
It can be concluded that Hector is not every once knowing that Marion is not gentle.
Someone who is both gentle and not hungry is always not modern.
Jerry is modern if and only if Gilbert is handsome and Hector is hungry.
As long as someone is not handsome, he is modern and not gentle.
If there is someone who is not gentle, then Hector is handsome and Marion is not hungry. | Phoebe is important. | neutral |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.