premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Morris is not sticky.
Olin is not blushing.
Olin is not sticky.
Sophie is pleasant.
Solomon is not lively.
Sophie is generous.
Morris is not pleasant.
Olin is not generous.
Solomon is pleasant.
Olin is not latter.
Morris is not lively.
Travis is not latter.If someone is not lively, then he is generous.
If there is someone who is not sticky, then Travis is pleasant and Morris is latter.
Sophie being latter implies that Stewart is not pleasant and Olin is not blushing.
Someone who is both blushing and not latter is always sticky.
It can be concluded that Travis is not lively once knowing that Sophie is not sticky.
Someone is not generous if and only if he is latter.
If there is at least one people who is pleasant, then Sophie is not generous.
Olin being not pleasant or Travis being latter implies that Stewart is blushing.
If Stewart is not latter, then Shawn is not blushing and Solomon is not sticky, and vice versa.
If someone is not sticky and lively, then he is both blushing and latter, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not pleasant, then Stewart is generous.
If Solomon is blushing, then Olin is pleasant and Solomon is not latter. | Travis is pleasant. | entailment |
Morris is not sticky.
Olin is not blushing.
Olin is not sticky.
Sophie is pleasant.
Solomon is not lively.
Sophie is generous.
Morris is not pleasant.
Olin is not generous.
Solomon is pleasant.
Olin is not latter.
Morris is not lively.
Travis is not latter.If someone is not lively, then he is generous.
If there is someone who is not sticky, then Travis is pleasant and Morris is latter.
Sophie being latter implies that Stewart is not pleasant and Olin is not blushing.
Someone who is both blushing and not latter is always sticky.
It can be concluded that Travis is not lively once knowing that Sophie is not sticky.
Someone is not generous if and only if he is latter.
If there is at least one people who is pleasant, then Sophie is not generous.
Olin being not pleasant or Travis being latter implies that Stewart is blushing.
If Stewart is not latter, then Shawn is not blushing and Solomon is not sticky, and vice versa.
If someone is not sticky and lively, then he is both blushing and latter, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not pleasant, then Stewart is generous.
If Solomon is blushing, then Olin is pleasant and Solomon is not latter. | Morris is not pleasant. | entailment |
Morris is not sticky.
Olin is not blushing.
Olin is not sticky.
Sophie is pleasant.
Solomon is not lively.
Sophie is generous.
Morris is not pleasant.
Olin is not generous.
Solomon is pleasant.
Olin is not latter.
Morris is not lively.
Travis is not latter.If someone is not lively, then he is generous.
If there is someone who is not sticky, then Travis is pleasant and Morris is latter.
Sophie being latter implies that Stewart is not pleasant and Olin is not blushing.
Someone who is both blushing and not latter is always sticky.
It can be concluded that Travis is not lively once knowing that Sophie is not sticky.
Someone is not generous if and only if he is latter.
If there is at least one people who is pleasant, then Sophie is not generous.
Olin being not pleasant or Travis being latter implies that Stewart is blushing.
If Stewart is not latter, then Shawn is not blushing and Solomon is not sticky, and vice versa.
If someone is not sticky and lively, then he is both blushing and latter, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not pleasant, then Stewart is generous.
If Solomon is blushing, then Olin is pleasant and Solomon is not latter. | Travis is latter. | contradiction |
Morris is not sticky.
Olin is not blushing.
Olin is not sticky.
Sophie is pleasant.
Solomon is not lively.
Sophie is generous.
Morris is not pleasant.
Olin is not generous.
Solomon is pleasant.
Olin is not latter.
Morris is not lively.
Travis is not latter.If someone is not lively, then he is generous.
If there is someone who is not sticky, then Travis is pleasant and Morris is latter.
Sophie being latter implies that Stewart is not pleasant and Olin is not blushing.
Someone who is both blushing and not latter is always sticky.
It can be concluded that Travis is not lively once knowing that Sophie is not sticky.
Someone is not generous if and only if he is latter.
If there is at least one people who is pleasant, then Sophie is not generous.
Olin being not pleasant or Travis being latter implies that Stewart is blushing.
If Stewart is not latter, then Shawn is not blushing and Solomon is not sticky, and vice versa.
If someone is not sticky and lively, then he is both blushing and latter, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not pleasant, then Stewart is generous.
If Solomon is blushing, then Olin is pleasant and Solomon is not latter. | Solomon is lively. | contradiction |
Morris is not sticky.
Olin is not blushing.
Olin is not sticky.
Sophie is pleasant.
Solomon is not lively.
Sophie is generous.
Morris is not pleasant.
Olin is not generous.
Solomon is pleasant.
Olin is not latter.
Morris is not lively.
Travis is not latter.If someone is not lively, then he is generous.
If there is someone who is not sticky, then Travis is pleasant and Morris is latter.
Sophie being latter implies that Stewart is not pleasant and Olin is not blushing.
Someone who is both blushing and not latter is always sticky.
It can be concluded that Travis is not lively once knowing that Sophie is not sticky.
Someone is not generous if and only if he is latter.
If there is at least one people who is pleasant, then Sophie is not generous.
Olin being not pleasant or Travis being latter implies that Stewart is blushing.
If Stewart is not latter, then Shawn is not blushing and Solomon is not sticky, and vice versa.
If someone is not sticky and lively, then he is both blushing and latter, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not pleasant, then Stewart is generous.
If Solomon is blushing, then Olin is pleasant and Solomon is not latter. | Morris is not latter. | contradiction |
Morris is not sticky.
Olin is not blushing.
Olin is not sticky.
Sophie is pleasant.
Solomon is not lively.
Sophie is generous.
Morris is not pleasant.
Olin is not generous.
Solomon is pleasant.
Olin is not latter.
Morris is not lively.
Travis is not latter.If someone is not lively, then he is generous.
If there is someone who is not sticky, then Travis is pleasant and Morris is latter.
Sophie being latter implies that Stewart is not pleasant and Olin is not blushing.
Someone who is both blushing and not latter is always sticky.
It can be concluded that Travis is not lively once knowing that Sophie is not sticky.
Someone is not generous if and only if he is latter.
If there is at least one people who is pleasant, then Sophie is not generous.
Olin being not pleasant or Travis being latter implies that Stewart is blushing.
If Stewart is not latter, then Shawn is not blushing and Solomon is not sticky, and vice versa.
If someone is not sticky and lively, then he is both blushing and latter, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not pleasant, then Stewart is generous.
If Solomon is blushing, then Olin is pleasant and Solomon is not latter. | Sophie is pleasant. | entailment |
Morris is not sticky.
Olin is not blushing.
Olin is not sticky.
Sophie is pleasant.
Solomon is not lively.
Sophie is generous.
Morris is not pleasant.
Olin is not generous.
Solomon is pleasant.
Olin is not latter.
Morris is not lively.
Travis is not latter.If someone is not lively, then he is generous.
If there is someone who is not sticky, then Travis is pleasant and Morris is latter.
Sophie being latter implies that Stewart is not pleasant and Olin is not blushing.
Someone who is both blushing and not latter is always sticky.
It can be concluded that Travis is not lively once knowing that Sophie is not sticky.
Someone is not generous if and only if he is latter.
If there is at least one people who is pleasant, then Sophie is not generous.
Olin being not pleasant or Travis being latter implies that Stewart is blushing.
If Stewart is not latter, then Shawn is not blushing and Solomon is not sticky, and vice versa.
If someone is not sticky and lively, then he is both blushing and latter, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not pleasant, then Stewart is generous.
If Solomon is blushing, then Olin is pleasant and Solomon is not latter. | Olin is pleasant. | neutral |
Morris is not sticky.
Olin is not blushing.
Olin is not sticky.
Sophie is pleasant.
Solomon is not lively.
Sophie is generous.
Morris is not pleasant.
Olin is not generous.
Solomon is pleasant.
Olin is not latter.
Morris is not lively.
Travis is not latter.If someone is not lively, then he is generous.
If there is someone who is not sticky, then Travis is pleasant and Morris is latter.
Sophie being latter implies that Stewart is not pleasant and Olin is not blushing.
Someone who is both blushing and not latter is always sticky.
It can be concluded that Travis is not lively once knowing that Sophie is not sticky.
Someone is not generous if and only if he is latter.
If there is at least one people who is pleasant, then Sophie is not generous.
Olin being not pleasant or Travis being latter implies that Stewart is blushing.
If Stewart is not latter, then Shawn is not blushing and Solomon is not sticky, and vice versa.
If someone is not sticky and lively, then he is both blushing and latter, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not pleasant, then Stewart is generous.
If Solomon is blushing, then Olin is pleasant and Solomon is not latter. | Solomon is pleasant. | entailment |
Morris is not sticky.
Olin is not blushing.
Olin is not sticky.
Sophie is pleasant.
Solomon is not lively.
Sophie is generous.
Morris is not pleasant.
Olin is not generous.
Solomon is pleasant.
Olin is not latter.
Morris is not lively.
Travis is not latter.If someone is not lively, then he is generous.
If there is someone who is not sticky, then Travis is pleasant and Morris is latter.
Sophie being latter implies that Stewart is not pleasant and Olin is not blushing.
Someone who is both blushing and not latter is always sticky.
It can be concluded that Travis is not lively once knowing that Sophie is not sticky.
Someone is not generous if and only if he is latter.
If there is at least one people who is pleasant, then Sophie is not generous.
Olin being not pleasant or Travis being latter implies that Stewart is blushing.
If Stewart is not latter, then Shawn is not blushing and Solomon is not sticky, and vice versa.
If someone is not sticky and lively, then he is both blushing and latter, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not pleasant, then Stewart is generous.
If Solomon is blushing, then Olin is pleasant and Solomon is not latter. | Shawn is not blushing. | neutral |
Morris is not sticky.
Olin is not blushing.
Olin is not sticky.
Sophie is pleasant.
Solomon is not lively.
Sophie is generous.
Morris is not pleasant.
Olin is not generous.
Solomon is pleasant.
Olin is not latter.
Morris is not lively.
Travis is not latter.If someone is not lively, then he is generous.
If there is someone who is not sticky, then Travis is pleasant and Morris is latter.
Sophie being latter implies that Stewart is not pleasant and Olin is not blushing.
Someone who is both blushing and not latter is always sticky.
It can be concluded that Travis is not lively once knowing that Sophie is not sticky.
Someone is not generous if and only if he is latter.
If there is at least one people who is pleasant, then Sophie is not generous.
Olin being not pleasant or Travis being latter implies that Stewart is blushing.
If Stewart is not latter, then Shawn is not blushing and Solomon is not sticky, and vice versa.
If someone is not sticky and lively, then he is both blushing and latter, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not pleasant, then Stewart is generous.
If Solomon is blushing, then Olin is pleasant and Solomon is not latter. | Morris is not generous. | self_contradiction |
Morris is not sticky.
Olin is not blushing.
Olin is not sticky.
Sophie is pleasant.
Solomon is not lively.
Sophie is generous.
Morris is not pleasant.
Olin is not generous.
Solomon is pleasant.
Olin is not latter.
Morris is not lively.
Travis is not latter.If someone is not lively, then he is generous.
If there is someone who is not sticky, then Travis is pleasant and Morris is latter.
Sophie being latter implies that Stewart is not pleasant and Olin is not blushing.
Someone who is both blushing and not latter is always sticky.
It can be concluded that Travis is not lively once knowing that Sophie is not sticky.
Someone is not generous if and only if he is latter.
If there is at least one people who is pleasant, then Sophie is not generous.
Olin being not pleasant or Travis being latter implies that Stewart is blushing.
If Stewart is not latter, then Shawn is not blushing and Solomon is not sticky, and vice versa.
If someone is not sticky and lively, then he is both blushing and latter, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not pleasant, then Stewart is generous.
If Solomon is blushing, then Olin is pleasant and Solomon is not latter. | Travis is generous. | neutral |
Morris is not sticky.
Olin is not blushing.
Olin is not sticky.
Sophie is pleasant.
Solomon is not lively.
Sophie is generous.
Morris is not pleasant.
Olin is not generous.
Solomon is pleasant.
Olin is not latter.
Morris is not lively.
Travis is not latter.If someone is not lively, then he is generous.
If there is someone who is not sticky, then Travis is pleasant and Morris is latter.
Sophie being latter implies that Stewart is not pleasant and Olin is not blushing.
Someone who is both blushing and not latter is always sticky.
It can be concluded that Travis is not lively once knowing that Sophie is not sticky.
Someone is not generous if and only if he is latter.
If there is at least one people who is pleasant, then Sophie is not generous.
Olin being not pleasant or Travis being latter implies that Stewart is blushing.
If Stewart is not latter, then Shawn is not blushing and Solomon is not sticky, and vice versa.
If someone is not sticky and lively, then he is both blushing and latter, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not pleasant, then Stewart is generous.
If Solomon is blushing, then Olin is pleasant and Solomon is not latter. | Olin is latter. | self_contradiction |
Morris is not sticky.
Olin is not blushing.
Olin is not sticky.
Sophie is pleasant.
Solomon is not lively.
Sophie is generous.
Morris is not pleasant.
Olin is not generous.
Solomon is pleasant.
Olin is not latter.
Morris is not lively.
Travis is not latter.If someone is not lively, then he is generous.
If there is someone who is not sticky, then Travis is pleasant and Morris is latter.
Sophie being latter implies that Stewart is not pleasant and Olin is not blushing.
Someone who is both blushing and not latter is always sticky.
It can be concluded that Travis is not lively once knowing that Sophie is not sticky.
Someone is not generous if and only if he is latter.
If there is at least one people who is pleasant, then Sophie is not generous.
Olin being not pleasant or Travis being latter implies that Stewart is blushing.
If Stewart is not latter, then Shawn is not blushing and Solomon is not sticky, and vice versa.
If someone is not sticky and lively, then he is both blushing and latter, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not pleasant, then Stewart is generous.
If Solomon is blushing, then Olin is pleasant and Solomon is not latter. | Olin is blushing. | contradiction |
Morris is not sticky.
Olin is not blushing.
Olin is not sticky.
Sophie is pleasant.
Solomon is not lively.
Sophie is generous.
Morris is not pleasant.
Olin is not generous.
Solomon is pleasant.
Olin is not latter.
Morris is not lively.
Travis is not latter.If someone is not lively, then he is generous.
If there is someone who is not sticky, then Travis is pleasant and Morris is latter.
Sophie being latter implies that Stewart is not pleasant and Olin is not blushing.
Someone who is both blushing and not latter is always sticky.
It can be concluded that Travis is not lively once knowing that Sophie is not sticky.
Someone is not generous if and only if he is latter.
If there is at least one people who is pleasant, then Sophie is not generous.
Olin being not pleasant or Travis being latter implies that Stewart is blushing.
If Stewart is not latter, then Shawn is not blushing and Solomon is not sticky, and vice versa.
If someone is not sticky and lively, then he is both blushing and latter, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not pleasant, then Stewart is generous.
If Solomon is blushing, then Olin is pleasant and Solomon is not latter. | Travis is not sticky. | neutral |
Morris is not sticky.
Olin is not blushing.
Olin is not sticky.
Sophie is pleasant.
Solomon is not lively.
Sophie is generous.
Morris is not pleasant.
Olin is not generous.
Solomon is pleasant.
Olin is not latter.
Morris is not lively.
Travis is not latter.If someone is not lively, then he is generous.
If there is someone who is not sticky, then Travis is pleasant and Morris is latter.
Sophie being latter implies that Stewart is not pleasant and Olin is not blushing.
Someone who is both blushing and not latter is always sticky.
It can be concluded that Travis is not lively once knowing that Sophie is not sticky.
Someone is not generous if and only if he is latter.
If there is at least one people who is pleasant, then Sophie is not generous.
Olin being not pleasant or Travis being latter implies that Stewart is blushing.
If Stewart is not latter, then Shawn is not blushing and Solomon is not sticky, and vice versa.
If someone is not sticky and lively, then he is both blushing and latter, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not pleasant, then Stewart is generous.
If Solomon is blushing, then Olin is pleasant and Solomon is not latter. | Sophie is not generous. | self_contradiction |
Morris is not sticky.
Olin is not blushing.
Olin is not sticky.
Sophie is pleasant.
Solomon is not lively.
Sophie is generous.
Morris is not pleasant.
Olin is not generous.
Solomon is pleasant.
Olin is not latter.
Morris is not lively.
Travis is not latter.If someone is not lively, then he is generous.
If there is someone who is not sticky, then Travis is pleasant and Morris is latter.
Sophie being latter implies that Stewart is not pleasant and Olin is not blushing.
Someone who is both blushing and not latter is always sticky.
It can be concluded that Travis is not lively once knowing that Sophie is not sticky.
Someone is not generous if and only if he is latter.
If there is at least one people who is pleasant, then Sophie is not generous.
Olin being not pleasant or Travis being latter implies that Stewart is blushing.
If Stewart is not latter, then Shawn is not blushing and Solomon is not sticky, and vice versa.
If someone is not sticky and lively, then he is both blushing and latter, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not pleasant, then Stewart is generous.
If Solomon is blushing, then Olin is pleasant and Solomon is not latter. | Sophie is generous. | self_contradiction |
Morris is not sticky.
Olin is not blushing.
Olin is not sticky.
Sophie is pleasant.
Solomon is not lively.
Sophie is generous.
Morris is not pleasant.
Olin is not generous.
Solomon is pleasant.
Olin is not latter.
Morris is not lively.
Travis is not latter.If someone is not lively, then he is generous.
If there is someone who is not sticky, then Travis is pleasant and Morris is latter.
Sophie being latter implies that Stewart is not pleasant and Olin is not blushing.
Someone who is both blushing and not latter is always sticky.
It can be concluded that Travis is not lively once knowing that Sophie is not sticky.
Someone is not generous if and only if he is latter.
If there is at least one people who is pleasant, then Sophie is not generous.
Olin being not pleasant or Travis being latter implies that Stewart is blushing.
If Stewart is not latter, then Shawn is not blushing and Solomon is not sticky, and vice versa.
If someone is not sticky and lively, then he is both blushing and latter, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not pleasant, then Stewart is generous.
If Solomon is blushing, then Olin is pleasant and Solomon is not latter. | Morris is not lively. | entailment |
Morris is not sticky.
Olin is not blushing.
Olin is not sticky.
Sophie is pleasant.
Solomon is not lively.
Sophie is generous.
Morris is not pleasant.
Olin is not generous.
Solomon is pleasant.
Olin is not latter.
Morris is not lively.
Travis is not latter.If someone is not lively, then he is generous.
If there is someone who is not sticky, then Travis is pleasant and Morris is latter.
Sophie being latter implies that Stewart is not pleasant and Olin is not blushing.
Someone who is both blushing and not latter is always sticky.
It can be concluded that Travis is not lively once knowing that Sophie is not sticky.
Someone is not generous if and only if he is latter.
If there is at least one people who is pleasant, then Sophie is not generous.
Olin being not pleasant or Travis being latter implies that Stewart is blushing.
If Stewart is not latter, then Shawn is not blushing and Solomon is not sticky, and vice versa.
If someone is not sticky and lively, then he is both blushing and latter, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not pleasant, then Stewart is generous.
If Solomon is blushing, then Olin is pleasant and Solomon is not latter. | Morris is not blushing. | neutral |
Morris is not sticky.
Olin is not blushing.
Olin is not sticky.
Sophie is pleasant.
Solomon is not lively.
Sophie is generous.
Morris is not pleasant.
Olin is not generous.
Solomon is pleasant.
Olin is not latter.
Morris is not lively.
Travis is not latter.If someone is not lively, then he is generous.
If there is someone who is not sticky, then Travis is pleasant and Morris is latter.
Sophie being latter implies that Stewart is not pleasant and Olin is not blushing.
Someone who is both blushing and not latter is always sticky.
It can be concluded that Travis is not lively once knowing that Sophie is not sticky.
Someone is not generous if and only if he is latter.
If there is at least one people who is pleasant, then Sophie is not generous.
Olin being not pleasant or Travis being latter implies that Stewart is blushing.
If Stewart is not latter, then Shawn is not blushing and Solomon is not sticky, and vice versa.
If someone is not sticky and lively, then he is both blushing and latter, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not pleasant, then Stewart is generous.
If Solomon is blushing, then Olin is pleasant and Solomon is not latter. | Olin is not latter. | self_contradiction |
Morris is not sticky.
Olin is not blushing.
Olin is not sticky.
Sophie is pleasant.
Solomon is not lively.
Sophie is generous.
Morris is not pleasant.
Olin is not generous.
Solomon is pleasant.
Olin is not latter.
Morris is not lively.
Travis is not latter.If someone is not lively, then he is generous.
If there is someone who is not sticky, then Travis is pleasant and Morris is latter.
Sophie being latter implies that Stewart is not pleasant and Olin is not blushing.
Someone who is both blushing and not latter is always sticky.
It can be concluded that Travis is not lively once knowing that Sophie is not sticky.
Someone is not generous if and only if he is latter.
If there is at least one people who is pleasant, then Sophie is not generous.
Olin being not pleasant or Travis being latter implies that Stewart is blushing.
If Stewart is not latter, then Shawn is not blushing and Solomon is not sticky, and vice versa.
If someone is not sticky and lively, then he is both blushing and latter, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not pleasant, then Stewart is generous.
If Solomon is blushing, then Olin is pleasant and Solomon is not latter. | Morris is lively. | contradiction |
Buck is timid.
Carlos is not foolish.
Fred is not medical.
Kerry is not light.
Kerry is timid.
Channing is warm-hearted.
Buck is not light.
Kyle is not foolish.
Fred is not timid.
Fred is warm-hearted.
Fred is not foolish.
Channing is light.If Buck is light and Channing is warm-hearted, then Channing is foolish and Kerry is generous, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not light and foolish, then Carlos is generous.
If Carlos is warm-hearted and Fred is timid, then Carlos is not medical and Kyle is generous.
If there is at least one people who is not timid, then Carlos is not foolish and Carlos is medical.
If there is at least one people who is light, then Carlos is not warm-hearted.
Someone being both not generous and not warm-hearted is equivalent to being medical and timid.
If Konrad is not medical and Fred is not warm-hearted, then Carlos is light.
If someone is medical or not warm-hearted, then he is timid.
As long as someone is generous, he is foolish and light.
Someone who is not timid is always medical.
If all people are timid, then Kerry is not light.
If there is at least one people who is generous, then Konrad is timid and Konrad is not warm-hearted. | Carlos is foolish. | contradiction |
Buck is timid.
Carlos is not foolish.
Fred is not medical.
Kerry is not light.
Kerry is timid.
Channing is warm-hearted.
Buck is not light.
Kyle is not foolish.
Fred is not timid.
Fred is warm-hearted.
Fred is not foolish.
Channing is light.If Buck is light and Channing is warm-hearted, then Channing is foolish and Kerry is generous, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not light and foolish, then Carlos is generous.
If Carlos is warm-hearted and Fred is timid, then Carlos is not medical and Kyle is generous.
If there is at least one people who is not timid, then Carlos is not foolish and Carlos is medical.
If there is at least one people who is light, then Carlos is not warm-hearted.
Someone being both not generous and not warm-hearted is equivalent to being medical and timid.
If Konrad is not medical and Fred is not warm-hearted, then Carlos is light.
If someone is medical or not warm-hearted, then he is timid.
As long as someone is generous, he is foolish and light.
Someone who is not timid is always medical.
If all people are timid, then Kerry is not light.
If there is at least one people who is generous, then Konrad is timid and Konrad is not warm-hearted. | Kyle is warm-hearted. | neutral |
Buck is timid.
Carlos is not foolish.
Fred is not medical.
Kerry is not light.
Kerry is timid.
Channing is warm-hearted.
Buck is not light.
Kyle is not foolish.
Fred is not timid.
Fred is warm-hearted.
Fred is not foolish.
Channing is light.If Buck is light and Channing is warm-hearted, then Channing is foolish and Kerry is generous, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not light and foolish, then Carlos is generous.
If Carlos is warm-hearted and Fred is timid, then Carlos is not medical and Kyle is generous.
If there is at least one people who is not timid, then Carlos is not foolish and Carlos is medical.
If there is at least one people who is light, then Carlos is not warm-hearted.
Someone being both not generous and not warm-hearted is equivalent to being medical and timid.
If Konrad is not medical and Fred is not warm-hearted, then Carlos is light.
If someone is medical or not warm-hearted, then he is timid.
As long as someone is generous, he is foolish and light.
Someone who is not timid is always medical.
If all people are timid, then Kerry is not light.
If there is at least one people who is generous, then Konrad is timid and Konrad is not warm-hearted. | Channing is warm-hearted. | entailment |
Buck is timid.
Carlos is not foolish.
Fred is not medical.
Kerry is not light.
Kerry is timid.
Channing is warm-hearted.
Buck is not light.
Kyle is not foolish.
Fred is not timid.
Fred is warm-hearted.
Fred is not foolish.
Channing is light.If Buck is light and Channing is warm-hearted, then Channing is foolish and Kerry is generous, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not light and foolish, then Carlos is generous.
If Carlos is warm-hearted and Fred is timid, then Carlos is not medical and Kyle is generous.
If there is at least one people who is not timid, then Carlos is not foolish and Carlos is medical.
If there is at least one people who is light, then Carlos is not warm-hearted.
Someone being both not generous and not warm-hearted is equivalent to being medical and timid.
If Konrad is not medical and Fred is not warm-hearted, then Carlos is light.
If someone is medical or not warm-hearted, then he is timid.
As long as someone is generous, he is foolish and light.
Someone who is not timid is always medical.
If all people are timid, then Kerry is not light.
If there is at least one people who is generous, then Konrad is timid and Konrad is not warm-hearted. | Carlos is not timid. | contradiction |
Buck is timid.
Carlos is not foolish.
Fred is not medical.
Kerry is not light.
Kerry is timid.
Channing is warm-hearted.
Buck is not light.
Kyle is not foolish.
Fred is not timid.
Fred is warm-hearted.
Fred is not foolish.
Channing is light.If Buck is light and Channing is warm-hearted, then Channing is foolish and Kerry is generous, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not light and foolish, then Carlos is generous.
If Carlos is warm-hearted and Fred is timid, then Carlos is not medical and Kyle is generous.
If there is at least one people who is not timid, then Carlos is not foolish and Carlos is medical.
If there is at least one people who is light, then Carlos is not warm-hearted.
Someone being both not generous and not warm-hearted is equivalent to being medical and timid.
If Konrad is not medical and Fred is not warm-hearted, then Carlos is light.
If someone is medical or not warm-hearted, then he is timid.
As long as someone is generous, he is foolish and light.
Someone who is not timid is always medical.
If all people are timid, then Kerry is not light.
If there is at least one people who is generous, then Konrad is timid and Konrad is not warm-hearted. | Fred is not medical. | self_contradiction |
Buck is timid.
Carlos is not foolish.
Fred is not medical.
Kerry is not light.
Kerry is timid.
Channing is warm-hearted.
Buck is not light.
Kyle is not foolish.
Fred is not timid.
Fred is warm-hearted.
Fred is not foolish.
Channing is light.If Buck is light and Channing is warm-hearted, then Channing is foolish and Kerry is generous, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not light and foolish, then Carlos is generous.
If Carlos is warm-hearted and Fred is timid, then Carlos is not medical and Kyle is generous.
If there is at least one people who is not timid, then Carlos is not foolish and Carlos is medical.
If there is at least one people who is light, then Carlos is not warm-hearted.
Someone being both not generous and not warm-hearted is equivalent to being medical and timid.
If Konrad is not medical and Fred is not warm-hearted, then Carlos is light.
If someone is medical or not warm-hearted, then he is timid.
As long as someone is generous, he is foolish and light.
Someone who is not timid is always medical.
If all people are timid, then Kerry is not light.
If there is at least one people who is generous, then Konrad is timid and Konrad is not warm-hearted. | Fred is medical. | self_contradiction |
Buck is timid.
Carlos is not foolish.
Fred is not medical.
Kerry is not light.
Kerry is timid.
Channing is warm-hearted.
Buck is not light.
Kyle is not foolish.
Fred is not timid.
Fred is warm-hearted.
Fred is not foolish.
Channing is light.If Buck is light and Channing is warm-hearted, then Channing is foolish and Kerry is generous, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not light and foolish, then Carlos is generous.
If Carlos is warm-hearted and Fred is timid, then Carlos is not medical and Kyle is generous.
If there is at least one people who is not timid, then Carlos is not foolish and Carlos is medical.
If there is at least one people who is light, then Carlos is not warm-hearted.
Someone being both not generous and not warm-hearted is equivalent to being medical and timid.
If Konrad is not medical and Fred is not warm-hearted, then Carlos is light.
If someone is medical or not warm-hearted, then he is timid.
As long as someone is generous, he is foolish and light.
Someone who is not timid is always medical.
If all people are timid, then Kerry is not light.
If there is at least one people who is generous, then Konrad is timid and Konrad is not warm-hearted. | Buck is medical. | neutral |
Buck is timid.
Carlos is not foolish.
Fred is not medical.
Kerry is not light.
Kerry is timid.
Channing is warm-hearted.
Buck is not light.
Kyle is not foolish.
Fred is not timid.
Fred is warm-hearted.
Fred is not foolish.
Channing is light.If Buck is light and Channing is warm-hearted, then Channing is foolish and Kerry is generous, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not light and foolish, then Carlos is generous.
If Carlos is warm-hearted and Fred is timid, then Carlos is not medical and Kyle is generous.
If there is at least one people who is not timid, then Carlos is not foolish and Carlos is medical.
If there is at least one people who is light, then Carlos is not warm-hearted.
Someone being both not generous and not warm-hearted is equivalent to being medical and timid.
If Konrad is not medical and Fred is not warm-hearted, then Carlos is light.
If someone is medical or not warm-hearted, then he is timid.
As long as someone is generous, he is foolish and light.
Someone who is not timid is always medical.
If all people are timid, then Kerry is not light.
If there is at least one people who is generous, then Konrad is timid and Konrad is not warm-hearted. | Konrad is not generous. | neutral |
Buck is timid.
Carlos is not foolish.
Fred is not medical.
Kerry is not light.
Kerry is timid.
Channing is warm-hearted.
Buck is not light.
Kyle is not foolish.
Fred is not timid.
Fred is warm-hearted.
Fred is not foolish.
Channing is light.If Buck is light and Channing is warm-hearted, then Channing is foolish and Kerry is generous, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not light and foolish, then Carlos is generous.
If Carlos is warm-hearted and Fred is timid, then Carlos is not medical and Kyle is generous.
If there is at least one people who is not timid, then Carlos is not foolish and Carlos is medical.
If there is at least one people who is light, then Carlos is not warm-hearted.
Someone being both not generous and not warm-hearted is equivalent to being medical and timid.
If Konrad is not medical and Fred is not warm-hearted, then Carlos is light.
If someone is medical or not warm-hearted, then he is timid.
As long as someone is generous, he is foolish and light.
Someone who is not timid is always medical.
If all people are timid, then Kerry is not light.
If there is at least one people who is generous, then Konrad is timid and Konrad is not warm-hearted. | Kerry is light. | contradiction |
Buck is timid.
Carlos is not foolish.
Fred is not medical.
Kerry is not light.
Kerry is timid.
Channing is warm-hearted.
Buck is not light.
Kyle is not foolish.
Fred is not timid.
Fred is warm-hearted.
Fred is not foolish.
Channing is light.If Buck is light and Channing is warm-hearted, then Channing is foolish and Kerry is generous, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not light and foolish, then Carlos is generous.
If Carlos is warm-hearted and Fred is timid, then Carlos is not medical and Kyle is generous.
If there is at least one people who is not timid, then Carlos is not foolish and Carlos is medical.
If there is at least one people who is light, then Carlos is not warm-hearted.
Someone being both not generous and not warm-hearted is equivalent to being medical and timid.
If Konrad is not medical and Fred is not warm-hearted, then Carlos is light.
If someone is medical or not warm-hearted, then he is timid.
As long as someone is generous, he is foolish and light.
Someone who is not timid is always medical.
If all people are timid, then Kerry is not light.
If there is at least one people who is generous, then Konrad is timid and Konrad is not warm-hearted. | Fred is not foolish. | entailment |
Buck is timid.
Carlos is not foolish.
Fred is not medical.
Kerry is not light.
Kerry is timid.
Channing is warm-hearted.
Buck is not light.
Kyle is not foolish.
Fred is not timid.
Fred is warm-hearted.
Fred is not foolish.
Channing is light.If Buck is light and Channing is warm-hearted, then Channing is foolish and Kerry is generous, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not light and foolish, then Carlos is generous.
If Carlos is warm-hearted and Fred is timid, then Carlos is not medical and Kyle is generous.
If there is at least one people who is not timid, then Carlos is not foolish and Carlos is medical.
If there is at least one people who is light, then Carlos is not warm-hearted.
Someone being both not generous and not warm-hearted is equivalent to being medical and timid.
If Konrad is not medical and Fred is not warm-hearted, then Carlos is light.
If someone is medical or not warm-hearted, then he is timid.
As long as someone is generous, he is foolish and light.
Someone who is not timid is always medical.
If all people are timid, then Kerry is not light.
If there is at least one people who is generous, then Konrad is timid and Konrad is not warm-hearted. | Buck is timid. | entailment |
Buck is timid.
Carlos is not foolish.
Fred is not medical.
Kerry is not light.
Kerry is timid.
Channing is warm-hearted.
Buck is not light.
Kyle is not foolish.
Fred is not timid.
Fred is warm-hearted.
Fred is not foolish.
Channing is light.If Buck is light and Channing is warm-hearted, then Channing is foolish and Kerry is generous, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not light and foolish, then Carlos is generous.
If Carlos is warm-hearted and Fred is timid, then Carlos is not medical and Kyle is generous.
If there is at least one people who is not timid, then Carlos is not foolish and Carlos is medical.
If there is at least one people who is light, then Carlos is not warm-hearted.
Someone being both not generous and not warm-hearted is equivalent to being medical and timid.
If Konrad is not medical and Fred is not warm-hearted, then Carlos is light.
If someone is medical or not warm-hearted, then he is timid.
As long as someone is generous, he is foolish and light.
Someone who is not timid is always medical.
If all people are timid, then Kerry is not light.
If there is at least one people who is generous, then Konrad is timid and Konrad is not warm-hearted. | Fred is not timid. | self_contradiction |
Buck is timid.
Carlos is not foolish.
Fred is not medical.
Kerry is not light.
Kerry is timid.
Channing is warm-hearted.
Buck is not light.
Kyle is not foolish.
Fred is not timid.
Fred is warm-hearted.
Fred is not foolish.
Channing is light.If Buck is light and Channing is warm-hearted, then Channing is foolish and Kerry is generous, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not light and foolish, then Carlos is generous.
If Carlos is warm-hearted and Fred is timid, then Carlos is not medical and Kyle is generous.
If there is at least one people who is not timid, then Carlos is not foolish and Carlos is medical.
If there is at least one people who is light, then Carlos is not warm-hearted.
Someone being both not generous and not warm-hearted is equivalent to being medical and timid.
If Konrad is not medical and Fred is not warm-hearted, then Carlos is light.
If someone is medical or not warm-hearted, then he is timid.
As long as someone is generous, he is foolish and light.
Someone who is not timid is always medical.
If all people are timid, then Kerry is not light.
If there is at least one people who is generous, then Konrad is timid and Konrad is not warm-hearted. | Fred is light. | neutral |
Buck is timid.
Carlos is not foolish.
Fred is not medical.
Kerry is not light.
Kerry is timid.
Channing is warm-hearted.
Buck is not light.
Kyle is not foolish.
Fred is not timid.
Fred is warm-hearted.
Fred is not foolish.
Channing is light.If Buck is light and Channing is warm-hearted, then Channing is foolish and Kerry is generous, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not light and foolish, then Carlos is generous.
If Carlos is warm-hearted and Fred is timid, then Carlos is not medical and Kyle is generous.
If there is at least one people who is not timid, then Carlos is not foolish and Carlos is medical.
If there is at least one people who is light, then Carlos is not warm-hearted.
Someone being both not generous and not warm-hearted is equivalent to being medical and timid.
If Konrad is not medical and Fred is not warm-hearted, then Carlos is light.
If someone is medical or not warm-hearted, then he is timid.
As long as someone is generous, he is foolish and light.
Someone who is not timid is always medical.
If all people are timid, then Kerry is not light.
If there is at least one people who is generous, then Konrad is timid and Konrad is not warm-hearted. | Fred is timid. | self_contradiction |
Buck is timid.
Carlos is not foolish.
Fred is not medical.
Kerry is not light.
Kerry is timid.
Channing is warm-hearted.
Buck is not light.
Kyle is not foolish.
Fred is not timid.
Fred is warm-hearted.
Fred is not foolish.
Channing is light.If Buck is light and Channing is warm-hearted, then Channing is foolish and Kerry is generous, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not light and foolish, then Carlos is generous.
If Carlos is warm-hearted and Fred is timid, then Carlos is not medical and Kyle is generous.
If there is at least one people who is not timid, then Carlos is not foolish and Carlos is medical.
If there is at least one people who is light, then Carlos is not warm-hearted.
Someone being both not generous and not warm-hearted is equivalent to being medical and timid.
If Konrad is not medical and Fred is not warm-hearted, then Carlos is light.
If someone is medical or not warm-hearted, then he is timid.
As long as someone is generous, he is foolish and light.
Someone who is not timid is always medical.
If all people are timid, then Kerry is not light.
If there is at least one people who is generous, then Konrad is timid and Konrad is not warm-hearted. | Fred is generous. | contradiction |
Buck is timid.
Carlos is not foolish.
Fred is not medical.
Kerry is not light.
Kerry is timid.
Channing is warm-hearted.
Buck is not light.
Kyle is not foolish.
Fred is not timid.
Fred is warm-hearted.
Fred is not foolish.
Channing is light.If Buck is light and Channing is warm-hearted, then Channing is foolish and Kerry is generous, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not light and foolish, then Carlos is generous.
If Carlos is warm-hearted and Fred is timid, then Carlos is not medical and Kyle is generous.
If there is at least one people who is not timid, then Carlos is not foolish and Carlos is medical.
If there is at least one people who is light, then Carlos is not warm-hearted.
Someone being both not generous and not warm-hearted is equivalent to being medical and timid.
If Konrad is not medical and Fred is not warm-hearted, then Carlos is light.
If someone is medical or not warm-hearted, then he is timid.
As long as someone is generous, he is foolish and light.
Someone who is not timid is always medical.
If all people are timid, then Kerry is not light.
If there is at least one people who is generous, then Konrad is timid and Konrad is not warm-hearted. | Fred is warm-hearted. | self_contradiction |
Buck is timid.
Carlos is not foolish.
Fred is not medical.
Kerry is not light.
Kerry is timid.
Channing is warm-hearted.
Buck is not light.
Kyle is not foolish.
Fred is not timid.
Fred is warm-hearted.
Fred is not foolish.
Channing is light.If Buck is light and Channing is warm-hearted, then Channing is foolish and Kerry is generous, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not light and foolish, then Carlos is generous.
If Carlos is warm-hearted and Fred is timid, then Carlos is not medical and Kyle is generous.
If there is at least one people who is not timid, then Carlos is not foolish and Carlos is medical.
If there is at least one people who is light, then Carlos is not warm-hearted.
Someone being both not generous and not warm-hearted is equivalent to being medical and timid.
If Konrad is not medical and Fred is not warm-hearted, then Carlos is light.
If someone is medical or not warm-hearted, then he is timid.
As long as someone is generous, he is foolish and light.
Someone who is not timid is always medical.
If all people are timid, then Kerry is not light.
If there is at least one people who is generous, then Konrad is timid and Konrad is not warm-hearted. | Buck is not light. | entailment |
Buck is timid.
Carlos is not foolish.
Fred is not medical.
Kerry is not light.
Kerry is timid.
Channing is warm-hearted.
Buck is not light.
Kyle is not foolish.
Fred is not timid.
Fred is warm-hearted.
Fred is not foolish.
Channing is light.If Buck is light and Channing is warm-hearted, then Channing is foolish and Kerry is generous, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not light and foolish, then Carlos is generous.
If Carlos is warm-hearted and Fred is timid, then Carlos is not medical and Kyle is generous.
If there is at least one people who is not timid, then Carlos is not foolish and Carlos is medical.
If there is at least one people who is light, then Carlos is not warm-hearted.
Someone being both not generous and not warm-hearted is equivalent to being medical and timid.
If Konrad is not medical and Fred is not warm-hearted, then Carlos is light.
If someone is medical or not warm-hearted, then he is timid.
As long as someone is generous, he is foolish and light.
Someone who is not timid is always medical.
If all people are timid, then Kerry is not light.
If there is at least one people who is generous, then Konrad is timid and Konrad is not warm-hearted. | Kerry is timid. | entailment |
Buck is timid.
Carlos is not foolish.
Fred is not medical.
Kerry is not light.
Kerry is timid.
Channing is warm-hearted.
Buck is not light.
Kyle is not foolish.
Fred is not timid.
Fred is warm-hearted.
Fred is not foolish.
Channing is light.If Buck is light and Channing is warm-hearted, then Channing is foolish and Kerry is generous, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not light and foolish, then Carlos is generous.
If Carlos is warm-hearted and Fred is timid, then Carlos is not medical and Kyle is generous.
If there is at least one people who is not timid, then Carlos is not foolish and Carlos is medical.
If there is at least one people who is light, then Carlos is not warm-hearted.
Someone being both not generous and not warm-hearted is equivalent to being medical and timid.
If Konrad is not medical and Fred is not warm-hearted, then Carlos is light.
If someone is medical or not warm-hearted, then he is timid.
As long as someone is generous, he is foolish and light.
Someone who is not timid is always medical.
If all people are timid, then Kerry is not light.
If there is at least one people who is generous, then Konrad is timid and Konrad is not warm-hearted. | Konrad is not light. | neutral |
Buck is timid.
Carlos is not foolish.
Fred is not medical.
Kerry is not light.
Kerry is timid.
Channing is warm-hearted.
Buck is not light.
Kyle is not foolish.
Fred is not timid.
Fred is warm-hearted.
Fred is not foolish.
Channing is light.If Buck is light and Channing is warm-hearted, then Channing is foolish and Kerry is generous, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not light and foolish, then Carlos is generous.
If Carlos is warm-hearted and Fred is timid, then Carlos is not medical and Kyle is generous.
If there is at least one people who is not timid, then Carlos is not foolish and Carlos is medical.
If there is at least one people who is light, then Carlos is not warm-hearted.
Someone being both not generous and not warm-hearted is equivalent to being medical and timid.
If Konrad is not medical and Fred is not warm-hearted, then Carlos is light.
If someone is medical or not warm-hearted, then he is timid.
As long as someone is generous, he is foolish and light.
Someone who is not timid is always medical.
If all people are timid, then Kerry is not light.
If there is at least one people who is generous, then Konrad is timid and Konrad is not warm-hearted. | Kerry is not timid. | contradiction |
Aedan is good.
Kilian is exuberant.
Lester is rich.
Kilian is not good.
Aidan is wild.
Griswald is not wild.
Griswald is rich.
Aidan is not petite.
Aidan is sensible.
Kilian is wild.
Griswald is good.
Griswald is not sensible.If Uriah is rich or Aidan is not good, then Griswald is wild.
If Nathalie is not exuberant, then Kilian is rich.
If someone is not petite or not wild, then he is rich.
If there is at least one people who is both exuberant and not good, then Aidan is wild.
Kilian being not good implies that Aedan is exuberant.
If there is at least one people who is sensible, then Nathalie is not exuberant and Nathalie is wild.
If someone is sensible or wild, then he is exuberant.
Someone is rich if and only if he is wild.
Someone who is good and not petite is always rich and wild.
If Griswald is not good, then Kilian is rich and Kilian is wild.
Someone who is eithor not exuberant or sensible is always petite.
If Kilian is exuberant, then Aidan is sensible and Nathalie is good. | Lester is not good. | neutral |
Aedan is good.
Kilian is exuberant.
Lester is rich.
Kilian is not good.
Aidan is wild.
Griswald is not wild.
Griswald is rich.
Aidan is not petite.
Aidan is sensible.
Kilian is wild.
Griswald is good.
Griswald is not sensible.If Uriah is rich or Aidan is not good, then Griswald is wild.
If Nathalie is not exuberant, then Kilian is rich.
If someone is not petite or not wild, then he is rich.
If there is at least one people who is both exuberant and not good, then Aidan is wild.
Kilian being not good implies that Aedan is exuberant.
If there is at least one people who is sensible, then Nathalie is not exuberant and Nathalie is wild.
If someone is sensible or wild, then he is exuberant.
Someone is rich if and only if he is wild.
Someone who is good and not petite is always rich and wild.
If Griswald is not good, then Kilian is rich and Kilian is wild.
Someone who is eithor not exuberant or sensible is always petite.
If Kilian is exuberant, then Aidan is sensible and Nathalie is good. | Lester is not rich. | contradiction |
Aedan is good.
Kilian is exuberant.
Lester is rich.
Kilian is not good.
Aidan is wild.
Griswald is not wild.
Griswald is rich.
Aidan is not petite.
Aidan is sensible.
Kilian is wild.
Griswald is good.
Griswald is not sensible.If Uriah is rich or Aidan is not good, then Griswald is wild.
If Nathalie is not exuberant, then Kilian is rich.
If someone is not petite or not wild, then he is rich.
If there is at least one people who is both exuberant and not good, then Aidan is wild.
Kilian being not good implies that Aedan is exuberant.
If there is at least one people who is sensible, then Nathalie is not exuberant and Nathalie is wild.
If someone is sensible or wild, then he is exuberant.
Someone is rich if and only if he is wild.
Someone who is good and not petite is always rich and wild.
If Griswald is not good, then Kilian is rich and Kilian is wild.
Someone who is eithor not exuberant or sensible is always petite.
If Kilian is exuberant, then Aidan is sensible and Nathalie is good. | Aidan is exuberant. | entailment |
Aedan is good.
Kilian is exuberant.
Lester is rich.
Kilian is not good.
Aidan is wild.
Griswald is not wild.
Griswald is rich.
Aidan is not petite.
Aidan is sensible.
Kilian is wild.
Griswald is good.
Griswald is not sensible.If Uriah is rich or Aidan is not good, then Griswald is wild.
If Nathalie is not exuberant, then Kilian is rich.
If someone is not petite or not wild, then he is rich.
If there is at least one people who is both exuberant and not good, then Aidan is wild.
Kilian being not good implies that Aedan is exuberant.
If there is at least one people who is sensible, then Nathalie is not exuberant and Nathalie is wild.
If someone is sensible or wild, then he is exuberant.
Someone is rich if and only if he is wild.
Someone who is good and not petite is always rich and wild.
If Griswald is not good, then Kilian is rich and Kilian is wild.
Someone who is eithor not exuberant or sensible is always petite.
If Kilian is exuberant, then Aidan is sensible and Nathalie is good. | Nathalie is wild. | entailment |
Aedan is good.
Kilian is exuberant.
Lester is rich.
Kilian is not good.
Aidan is wild.
Griswald is not wild.
Griswald is rich.
Aidan is not petite.
Aidan is sensible.
Kilian is wild.
Griswald is good.
Griswald is not sensible.If Uriah is rich or Aidan is not good, then Griswald is wild.
If Nathalie is not exuberant, then Kilian is rich.
If someone is not petite or not wild, then he is rich.
If there is at least one people who is both exuberant and not good, then Aidan is wild.
Kilian being not good implies that Aedan is exuberant.
If there is at least one people who is sensible, then Nathalie is not exuberant and Nathalie is wild.
If someone is sensible or wild, then he is exuberant.
Someone is rich if and only if he is wild.
Someone who is good and not petite is always rich and wild.
If Griswald is not good, then Kilian is rich and Kilian is wild.
Someone who is eithor not exuberant or sensible is always petite.
If Kilian is exuberant, then Aidan is sensible and Nathalie is good. | Uriah is good. | neutral |
Aedan is good.
Kilian is exuberant.
Lester is rich.
Kilian is not good.
Aidan is wild.
Griswald is not wild.
Griswald is rich.
Aidan is not petite.
Aidan is sensible.
Kilian is wild.
Griswald is good.
Griswald is not sensible.If Uriah is rich or Aidan is not good, then Griswald is wild.
If Nathalie is not exuberant, then Kilian is rich.
If someone is not petite or not wild, then he is rich.
If there is at least one people who is both exuberant and not good, then Aidan is wild.
Kilian being not good implies that Aedan is exuberant.
If there is at least one people who is sensible, then Nathalie is not exuberant and Nathalie is wild.
If someone is sensible or wild, then he is exuberant.
Someone is rich if and only if he is wild.
Someone who is good and not petite is always rich and wild.
If Griswald is not good, then Kilian is rich and Kilian is wild.
Someone who is eithor not exuberant or sensible is always petite.
If Kilian is exuberant, then Aidan is sensible and Nathalie is good. | Lester is not wild. | contradiction |
Aedan is good.
Kilian is exuberant.
Lester is rich.
Kilian is not good.
Aidan is wild.
Griswald is not wild.
Griswald is rich.
Aidan is not petite.
Aidan is sensible.
Kilian is wild.
Griswald is good.
Griswald is not sensible.If Uriah is rich or Aidan is not good, then Griswald is wild.
If Nathalie is not exuberant, then Kilian is rich.
If someone is not petite or not wild, then he is rich.
If there is at least one people who is both exuberant and not good, then Aidan is wild.
Kilian being not good implies that Aedan is exuberant.
If there is at least one people who is sensible, then Nathalie is not exuberant and Nathalie is wild.
If someone is sensible or wild, then he is exuberant.
Someone is rich if and only if he is wild.
Someone who is good and not petite is always rich and wild.
If Griswald is not good, then Kilian is rich and Kilian is wild.
Someone who is eithor not exuberant or sensible is always petite.
If Kilian is exuberant, then Aidan is sensible and Nathalie is good. | Griswald is wild. | self_contradiction |
Aedan is good.
Kilian is exuberant.
Lester is rich.
Kilian is not good.
Aidan is wild.
Griswald is not wild.
Griswald is rich.
Aidan is not petite.
Aidan is sensible.
Kilian is wild.
Griswald is good.
Griswald is not sensible.If Uriah is rich or Aidan is not good, then Griswald is wild.
If Nathalie is not exuberant, then Kilian is rich.
If someone is not petite or not wild, then he is rich.
If there is at least one people who is both exuberant and not good, then Aidan is wild.
Kilian being not good implies that Aedan is exuberant.
If there is at least one people who is sensible, then Nathalie is not exuberant and Nathalie is wild.
If someone is sensible or wild, then he is exuberant.
Someone is rich if and only if he is wild.
Someone who is good and not petite is always rich and wild.
If Griswald is not good, then Kilian is rich and Kilian is wild.
Someone who is eithor not exuberant or sensible is always petite.
If Kilian is exuberant, then Aidan is sensible and Nathalie is good. | Aidan is petite. | self_contradiction |
Aedan is good.
Kilian is exuberant.
Lester is rich.
Kilian is not good.
Aidan is wild.
Griswald is not wild.
Griswald is rich.
Aidan is not petite.
Aidan is sensible.
Kilian is wild.
Griswald is good.
Griswald is not sensible.If Uriah is rich or Aidan is not good, then Griswald is wild.
If Nathalie is not exuberant, then Kilian is rich.
If someone is not petite or not wild, then he is rich.
If there is at least one people who is both exuberant and not good, then Aidan is wild.
Kilian being not good implies that Aedan is exuberant.
If there is at least one people who is sensible, then Nathalie is not exuberant and Nathalie is wild.
If someone is sensible or wild, then he is exuberant.
Someone is rich if and only if he is wild.
Someone who is good and not petite is always rich and wild.
If Griswald is not good, then Kilian is rich and Kilian is wild.
Someone who is eithor not exuberant or sensible is always petite.
If Kilian is exuberant, then Aidan is sensible and Nathalie is good. | Aidan is not petite. | self_contradiction |
Aedan is good.
Kilian is exuberant.
Lester is rich.
Kilian is not good.
Aidan is wild.
Griswald is not wild.
Griswald is rich.
Aidan is not petite.
Aidan is sensible.
Kilian is wild.
Griswald is good.
Griswald is not sensible.If Uriah is rich or Aidan is not good, then Griswald is wild.
If Nathalie is not exuberant, then Kilian is rich.
If someone is not petite or not wild, then he is rich.
If there is at least one people who is both exuberant and not good, then Aidan is wild.
Kilian being not good implies that Aedan is exuberant.
If there is at least one people who is sensible, then Nathalie is not exuberant and Nathalie is wild.
If someone is sensible or wild, then he is exuberant.
Someone is rich if and only if he is wild.
Someone who is good and not petite is always rich and wild.
If Griswald is not good, then Kilian is rich and Kilian is wild.
Someone who is eithor not exuberant or sensible is always petite.
If Kilian is exuberant, then Aidan is sensible and Nathalie is good. | Griswald is not wild. | self_contradiction |
Aedan is good.
Kilian is exuberant.
Lester is rich.
Kilian is not good.
Aidan is wild.
Griswald is not wild.
Griswald is rich.
Aidan is not petite.
Aidan is sensible.
Kilian is wild.
Griswald is good.
Griswald is not sensible.If Uriah is rich or Aidan is not good, then Griswald is wild.
If Nathalie is not exuberant, then Kilian is rich.
If someone is not petite or not wild, then he is rich.
If there is at least one people who is both exuberant and not good, then Aidan is wild.
Kilian being not good implies that Aedan is exuberant.
If there is at least one people who is sensible, then Nathalie is not exuberant and Nathalie is wild.
If someone is sensible or wild, then he is exuberant.
Someone is rich if and only if he is wild.
Someone who is good and not petite is always rich and wild.
If Griswald is not good, then Kilian is rich and Kilian is wild.
Someone who is eithor not exuberant or sensible is always petite.
If Kilian is exuberant, then Aidan is sensible and Nathalie is good. | Nathalie is not good. | contradiction |
Aedan is good.
Kilian is exuberant.
Lester is rich.
Kilian is not good.
Aidan is wild.
Griswald is not wild.
Griswald is rich.
Aidan is not petite.
Aidan is sensible.
Kilian is wild.
Griswald is good.
Griswald is not sensible.If Uriah is rich or Aidan is not good, then Griswald is wild.
If Nathalie is not exuberant, then Kilian is rich.
If someone is not petite or not wild, then he is rich.
If there is at least one people who is both exuberant and not good, then Aidan is wild.
Kilian being not good implies that Aedan is exuberant.
If there is at least one people who is sensible, then Nathalie is not exuberant and Nathalie is wild.
If someone is sensible or wild, then he is exuberant.
Someone is rich if and only if he is wild.
Someone who is good and not petite is always rich and wild.
If Griswald is not good, then Kilian is rich and Kilian is wild.
Someone who is eithor not exuberant or sensible is always petite.
If Kilian is exuberant, then Aidan is sensible and Nathalie is good. | Lester is petite. | neutral |
Aedan is good.
Kilian is exuberant.
Lester is rich.
Kilian is not good.
Aidan is wild.
Griswald is not wild.
Griswald is rich.
Aidan is not petite.
Aidan is sensible.
Kilian is wild.
Griswald is good.
Griswald is not sensible.If Uriah is rich or Aidan is not good, then Griswald is wild.
If Nathalie is not exuberant, then Kilian is rich.
If someone is not petite or not wild, then he is rich.
If there is at least one people who is both exuberant and not good, then Aidan is wild.
Kilian being not good implies that Aedan is exuberant.
If there is at least one people who is sensible, then Nathalie is not exuberant and Nathalie is wild.
If someone is sensible or wild, then he is exuberant.
Someone is rich if and only if he is wild.
Someone who is good and not petite is always rich and wild.
If Griswald is not good, then Kilian is rich and Kilian is wild.
Someone who is eithor not exuberant or sensible is always petite.
If Kilian is exuberant, then Aidan is sensible and Nathalie is good. | Uriah is not wild. | neutral |
Aedan is good.
Kilian is exuberant.
Lester is rich.
Kilian is not good.
Aidan is wild.
Griswald is not wild.
Griswald is rich.
Aidan is not petite.
Aidan is sensible.
Kilian is wild.
Griswald is good.
Griswald is not sensible.If Uriah is rich or Aidan is not good, then Griswald is wild.
If Nathalie is not exuberant, then Kilian is rich.
If someone is not petite or not wild, then he is rich.
If there is at least one people who is both exuberant and not good, then Aidan is wild.
Kilian being not good implies that Aedan is exuberant.
If there is at least one people who is sensible, then Nathalie is not exuberant and Nathalie is wild.
If someone is sensible or wild, then he is exuberant.
Someone is rich if and only if he is wild.
Someone who is good and not petite is always rich and wild.
If Griswald is not good, then Kilian is rich and Kilian is wild.
Someone who is eithor not exuberant or sensible is always petite.
If Kilian is exuberant, then Aidan is sensible and Nathalie is good. | Kilian is not good. | entailment |
Aedan is good.
Kilian is exuberant.
Lester is rich.
Kilian is not good.
Aidan is wild.
Griswald is not wild.
Griswald is rich.
Aidan is not petite.
Aidan is sensible.
Kilian is wild.
Griswald is good.
Griswald is not sensible.If Uriah is rich or Aidan is not good, then Griswald is wild.
If Nathalie is not exuberant, then Kilian is rich.
If someone is not petite or not wild, then he is rich.
If there is at least one people who is both exuberant and not good, then Aidan is wild.
Kilian being not good implies that Aedan is exuberant.
If there is at least one people who is sensible, then Nathalie is not exuberant and Nathalie is wild.
If someone is sensible or wild, then he is exuberant.
Someone is rich if and only if he is wild.
Someone who is good and not petite is always rich and wild.
If Griswald is not good, then Kilian is rich and Kilian is wild.
Someone who is eithor not exuberant or sensible is always petite.
If Kilian is exuberant, then Aidan is sensible and Nathalie is good. | Aedan is exuberant. | entailment |
Aedan is good.
Kilian is exuberant.
Lester is rich.
Kilian is not good.
Aidan is wild.
Griswald is not wild.
Griswald is rich.
Aidan is not petite.
Aidan is sensible.
Kilian is wild.
Griswald is good.
Griswald is not sensible.If Uriah is rich or Aidan is not good, then Griswald is wild.
If Nathalie is not exuberant, then Kilian is rich.
If someone is not petite or not wild, then he is rich.
If there is at least one people who is both exuberant and not good, then Aidan is wild.
Kilian being not good implies that Aedan is exuberant.
If there is at least one people who is sensible, then Nathalie is not exuberant and Nathalie is wild.
If someone is sensible or wild, then he is exuberant.
Someone is rich if and only if he is wild.
Someone who is good and not petite is always rich and wild.
If Griswald is not good, then Kilian is rich and Kilian is wild.
Someone who is eithor not exuberant or sensible is always petite.
If Kilian is exuberant, then Aidan is sensible and Nathalie is good. | Aedan is not petite. | neutral |
Aedan is good.
Kilian is exuberant.
Lester is rich.
Kilian is not good.
Aidan is wild.
Griswald is not wild.
Griswald is rich.
Aidan is not petite.
Aidan is sensible.
Kilian is wild.
Griswald is good.
Griswald is not sensible.If Uriah is rich or Aidan is not good, then Griswald is wild.
If Nathalie is not exuberant, then Kilian is rich.
If someone is not petite or not wild, then he is rich.
If there is at least one people who is both exuberant and not good, then Aidan is wild.
Kilian being not good implies that Aedan is exuberant.
If there is at least one people who is sensible, then Nathalie is not exuberant and Nathalie is wild.
If someone is sensible or wild, then he is exuberant.
Someone is rich if and only if he is wild.
Someone who is good and not petite is always rich and wild.
If Griswald is not good, then Kilian is rich and Kilian is wild.
Someone who is eithor not exuberant or sensible is always petite.
If Kilian is exuberant, then Aidan is sensible and Nathalie is good. | Aidan is not wild. | contradiction |
Aedan is good.
Kilian is exuberant.
Lester is rich.
Kilian is not good.
Aidan is wild.
Griswald is not wild.
Griswald is rich.
Aidan is not petite.
Aidan is sensible.
Kilian is wild.
Griswald is good.
Griswald is not sensible.If Uriah is rich or Aidan is not good, then Griswald is wild.
If Nathalie is not exuberant, then Kilian is rich.
If someone is not petite or not wild, then he is rich.
If there is at least one people who is both exuberant and not good, then Aidan is wild.
Kilian being not good implies that Aedan is exuberant.
If there is at least one people who is sensible, then Nathalie is not exuberant and Nathalie is wild.
If someone is sensible or wild, then he is exuberant.
Someone is rich if and only if he is wild.
Someone who is good and not petite is always rich and wild.
If Griswald is not good, then Kilian is rich and Kilian is wild.
Someone who is eithor not exuberant or sensible is always petite.
If Kilian is exuberant, then Aidan is sensible and Nathalie is good. | Griswald is good. | entailment |
Aedan is good.
Kilian is exuberant.
Lester is rich.
Kilian is not good.
Aidan is wild.
Griswald is not wild.
Griswald is rich.
Aidan is not petite.
Aidan is sensible.
Kilian is wild.
Griswald is good.
Griswald is not sensible.If Uriah is rich or Aidan is not good, then Griswald is wild.
If Nathalie is not exuberant, then Kilian is rich.
If someone is not petite or not wild, then he is rich.
If there is at least one people who is both exuberant and not good, then Aidan is wild.
Kilian being not good implies that Aedan is exuberant.
If there is at least one people who is sensible, then Nathalie is not exuberant and Nathalie is wild.
If someone is sensible or wild, then he is exuberant.
Someone is rich if and only if he is wild.
Someone who is good and not petite is always rich and wild.
If Griswald is not good, then Kilian is rich and Kilian is wild.
Someone who is eithor not exuberant or sensible is always petite.
If Kilian is exuberant, then Aidan is sensible and Nathalie is good. | Nathalie is not exuberant. | self_contradiction |
Aedan is good.
Kilian is exuberant.
Lester is rich.
Kilian is not good.
Aidan is wild.
Griswald is not wild.
Griswald is rich.
Aidan is not petite.
Aidan is sensible.
Kilian is wild.
Griswald is good.
Griswald is not sensible.If Uriah is rich or Aidan is not good, then Griswald is wild.
If Nathalie is not exuberant, then Kilian is rich.
If someone is not petite or not wild, then he is rich.
If there is at least one people who is both exuberant and not good, then Aidan is wild.
Kilian being not good implies that Aedan is exuberant.
If there is at least one people who is sensible, then Nathalie is not exuberant and Nathalie is wild.
If someone is sensible or wild, then he is exuberant.
Someone is rich if and only if he is wild.
Someone who is good and not petite is always rich and wild.
If Griswald is not good, then Kilian is rich and Kilian is wild.
Someone who is eithor not exuberant or sensible is always petite.
If Kilian is exuberant, then Aidan is sensible and Nathalie is good. | Lester is not exuberant. | contradiction |
Crispin is helpless.
Jessie is not attentive.
Kyle is not federal.
Merlin is not attentive.
Harlan is not successful.
Merlin is successful.
Kyle is helpless.
Tobias is not successful.
Merlin is not federal.
Harlan is not federal.
Kyle is not successful.
Tobias is not helpless.If there is nobody who is not not federal, then Jessie is not successful and Harlan is not wild.
If there is at least one people who is both successful and attentive, then Merlin is zealous.
Someone is not attentive and successful if and only if he is wild and not helpless.
If someone is successful and not federal, then he is both not helpless and wild, and vice versa.
Someone is helpless if and only if he is wild.
It can be concluded that Kathryn is wild once knowing that Jessie is not successful.
If there is at least one people who is successful, then Kyle is not helpless.
If someone is not attentive or he is federal, then he is wild.
If there is someone who is not wild, then Tobias is not successful.
Someone who is both not wild and not attentive is always successful.
If Tobias is successful, then Jessie is not wild.
If there is at least one people who is both not helpless and not federal, then Merlin is not zealous. | Merlin is not successful. | contradiction |
Crispin is helpless.
Jessie is not attentive.
Kyle is not federal.
Merlin is not attentive.
Harlan is not successful.
Merlin is successful.
Kyle is helpless.
Tobias is not successful.
Merlin is not federal.
Harlan is not federal.
Kyle is not successful.
Tobias is not helpless.If there is nobody who is not not federal, then Jessie is not successful and Harlan is not wild.
If there is at least one people who is both successful and attentive, then Merlin is zealous.
Someone is not attentive and successful if and only if he is wild and not helpless.
If someone is successful and not federal, then he is both not helpless and wild, and vice versa.
Someone is helpless if and only if he is wild.
It can be concluded that Kathryn is wild once knowing that Jessie is not successful.
If there is at least one people who is successful, then Kyle is not helpless.
If someone is not attentive or he is federal, then he is wild.
If there is someone who is not wild, then Tobias is not successful.
Someone who is both not wild and not attentive is always successful.
If Tobias is successful, then Jessie is not wild.
If there is at least one people who is both not helpless and not federal, then Merlin is not zealous. | Jessie is not helpless. | contradiction |
Crispin is helpless.
Jessie is not attentive.
Kyle is not federal.
Merlin is not attentive.
Harlan is not successful.
Merlin is successful.
Kyle is helpless.
Tobias is not successful.
Merlin is not federal.
Harlan is not federal.
Kyle is not successful.
Tobias is not helpless.If there is nobody who is not not federal, then Jessie is not successful and Harlan is not wild.
If there is at least one people who is both successful and attentive, then Merlin is zealous.
Someone is not attentive and successful if and only if he is wild and not helpless.
If someone is successful and not federal, then he is both not helpless and wild, and vice versa.
Someone is helpless if and only if he is wild.
It can be concluded that Kathryn is wild once knowing that Jessie is not successful.
If there is at least one people who is successful, then Kyle is not helpless.
If someone is not attentive or he is federal, then he is wild.
If there is someone who is not wild, then Tobias is not successful.
Someone who is both not wild and not attentive is always successful.
If Tobias is successful, then Jessie is not wild.
If there is at least one people who is both not helpless and not federal, then Merlin is not zealous. | Crispin is wild. | entailment |
Crispin is helpless.
Jessie is not attentive.
Kyle is not federal.
Merlin is not attentive.
Harlan is not successful.
Merlin is successful.
Kyle is helpless.
Tobias is not successful.
Merlin is not federal.
Harlan is not federal.
Kyle is not successful.
Tobias is not helpless.If there is nobody who is not not federal, then Jessie is not successful and Harlan is not wild.
If there is at least one people who is both successful and attentive, then Merlin is zealous.
Someone is not attentive and successful if and only if he is wild and not helpless.
If someone is successful and not federal, then he is both not helpless and wild, and vice versa.
Someone is helpless if and only if he is wild.
It can be concluded that Kathryn is wild once knowing that Jessie is not successful.
If there is at least one people who is successful, then Kyle is not helpless.
If someone is not attentive or he is federal, then he is wild.
If there is someone who is not wild, then Tobias is not successful.
Someone who is both not wild and not attentive is always successful.
If Tobias is successful, then Jessie is not wild.
If there is at least one people who is both not helpless and not federal, then Merlin is not zealous. | Merlin is not wild. | contradiction |
Crispin is helpless.
Jessie is not attentive.
Kyle is not federal.
Merlin is not attentive.
Harlan is not successful.
Merlin is successful.
Kyle is helpless.
Tobias is not successful.
Merlin is not federal.
Harlan is not federal.
Kyle is not successful.
Tobias is not helpless.If there is nobody who is not not federal, then Jessie is not successful and Harlan is not wild.
If there is at least one people who is both successful and attentive, then Merlin is zealous.
Someone is not attentive and successful if and only if he is wild and not helpless.
If someone is successful and not federal, then he is both not helpless and wild, and vice versa.
Someone is helpless if and only if he is wild.
It can be concluded that Kathryn is wild once knowing that Jessie is not successful.
If there is at least one people who is successful, then Kyle is not helpless.
If someone is not attentive or he is federal, then he is wild.
If there is someone who is not wild, then Tobias is not successful.
Someone who is both not wild and not attentive is always successful.
If Tobias is successful, then Jessie is not wild.
If there is at least one people who is both not helpless and not federal, then Merlin is not zealous. | Crispin is successful. | neutral |
Crispin is helpless.
Jessie is not attentive.
Kyle is not federal.
Merlin is not attentive.
Harlan is not successful.
Merlin is successful.
Kyle is helpless.
Tobias is not successful.
Merlin is not federal.
Harlan is not federal.
Kyle is not successful.
Tobias is not helpless.If there is nobody who is not not federal, then Jessie is not successful and Harlan is not wild.
If there is at least one people who is both successful and attentive, then Merlin is zealous.
Someone is not attentive and successful if and only if he is wild and not helpless.
If someone is successful and not federal, then he is both not helpless and wild, and vice versa.
Someone is helpless if and only if he is wild.
It can be concluded that Kathryn is wild once knowing that Jessie is not successful.
If there is at least one people who is successful, then Kyle is not helpless.
If someone is not attentive or he is federal, then he is wild.
If there is someone who is not wild, then Tobias is not successful.
Someone who is both not wild and not attentive is always successful.
If Tobias is successful, then Jessie is not wild.
If there is at least one people who is both not helpless and not federal, then Merlin is not zealous. | Merlin is helpless. | self_contradiction |
Crispin is helpless.
Jessie is not attentive.
Kyle is not federal.
Merlin is not attentive.
Harlan is not successful.
Merlin is successful.
Kyle is helpless.
Tobias is not successful.
Merlin is not federal.
Harlan is not federal.
Kyle is not successful.
Tobias is not helpless.If there is nobody who is not not federal, then Jessie is not successful and Harlan is not wild.
If there is at least one people who is both successful and attentive, then Merlin is zealous.
Someone is not attentive and successful if and only if he is wild and not helpless.
If someone is successful and not federal, then he is both not helpless and wild, and vice versa.
Someone is helpless if and only if he is wild.
It can be concluded that Kathryn is wild once knowing that Jessie is not successful.
If there is at least one people who is successful, then Kyle is not helpless.
If someone is not attentive or he is federal, then he is wild.
If there is someone who is not wild, then Tobias is not successful.
Someone who is both not wild and not attentive is always successful.
If Tobias is successful, then Jessie is not wild.
If there is at least one people who is both not helpless and not federal, then Merlin is not zealous. | Kyle is successful. | self_contradiction |
Crispin is helpless.
Jessie is not attentive.
Kyle is not federal.
Merlin is not attentive.
Harlan is not successful.
Merlin is successful.
Kyle is helpless.
Tobias is not successful.
Merlin is not federal.
Harlan is not federal.
Kyle is not successful.
Tobias is not helpless.If there is nobody who is not not federal, then Jessie is not successful and Harlan is not wild.
If there is at least one people who is both successful and attentive, then Merlin is zealous.
Someone is not attentive and successful if and only if he is wild and not helpless.
If someone is successful and not federal, then he is both not helpless and wild, and vice versa.
Someone is helpless if and only if he is wild.
It can be concluded that Kathryn is wild once knowing that Jessie is not successful.
If there is at least one people who is successful, then Kyle is not helpless.
If someone is not attentive or he is federal, then he is wild.
If there is someone who is not wild, then Tobias is not successful.
Someone who is both not wild and not attentive is always successful.
If Tobias is successful, then Jessie is not wild.
If there is at least one people who is both not helpless and not federal, then Merlin is not zealous. | Jessie is zealous. | neutral |
Crispin is helpless.
Jessie is not attentive.
Kyle is not federal.
Merlin is not attentive.
Harlan is not successful.
Merlin is successful.
Kyle is helpless.
Tobias is not successful.
Merlin is not federal.
Harlan is not federal.
Kyle is not successful.
Tobias is not helpless.If there is nobody who is not not federal, then Jessie is not successful and Harlan is not wild.
If there is at least one people who is both successful and attentive, then Merlin is zealous.
Someone is not attentive and successful if and only if he is wild and not helpless.
If someone is successful and not federal, then he is both not helpless and wild, and vice versa.
Someone is helpless if and only if he is wild.
It can be concluded that Kathryn is wild once knowing that Jessie is not successful.
If there is at least one people who is successful, then Kyle is not helpless.
If someone is not attentive or he is federal, then he is wild.
If there is someone who is not wild, then Tobias is not successful.
Someone who is both not wild and not attentive is always successful.
If Tobias is successful, then Jessie is not wild.
If there is at least one people who is both not helpless and not federal, then Merlin is not zealous. | Jessie is not attentive. | entailment |
Crispin is helpless.
Jessie is not attentive.
Kyle is not federal.
Merlin is not attentive.
Harlan is not successful.
Merlin is successful.
Kyle is helpless.
Tobias is not successful.
Merlin is not federal.
Harlan is not federal.
Kyle is not successful.
Tobias is not helpless.If there is nobody who is not not federal, then Jessie is not successful and Harlan is not wild.
If there is at least one people who is both successful and attentive, then Merlin is zealous.
Someone is not attentive and successful if and only if he is wild and not helpless.
If someone is successful and not federal, then he is both not helpless and wild, and vice versa.
Someone is helpless if and only if he is wild.
It can be concluded that Kathryn is wild once knowing that Jessie is not successful.
If there is at least one people who is successful, then Kyle is not helpless.
If someone is not attentive or he is federal, then he is wild.
If there is someone who is not wild, then Tobias is not successful.
Someone who is both not wild and not attentive is always successful.
If Tobias is successful, then Jessie is not wild.
If there is at least one people who is both not helpless and not federal, then Merlin is not zealous. | Merlin is not helpless. | self_contradiction |
Crispin is helpless.
Jessie is not attentive.
Kyle is not federal.
Merlin is not attentive.
Harlan is not successful.
Merlin is successful.
Kyle is helpless.
Tobias is not successful.
Merlin is not federal.
Harlan is not federal.
Kyle is not successful.
Tobias is not helpless.If there is nobody who is not not federal, then Jessie is not successful and Harlan is not wild.
If there is at least one people who is both successful and attentive, then Merlin is zealous.
Someone is not attentive and successful if and only if he is wild and not helpless.
If someone is successful and not federal, then he is both not helpless and wild, and vice versa.
Someone is helpless if and only if he is wild.
It can be concluded that Kathryn is wild once knowing that Jessie is not successful.
If there is at least one people who is successful, then Kyle is not helpless.
If someone is not attentive or he is federal, then he is wild.
If there is someone who is not wild, then Tobias is not successful.
Someone who is both not wild and not attentive is always successful.
If Tobias is successful, then Jessie is not wild.
If there is at least one people who is both not helpless and not federal, then Merlin is not zealous. | Merlin is attentive. | contradiction |
Crispin is helpless.
Jessie is not attentive.
Kyle is not federal.
Merlin is not attentive.
Harlan is not successful.
Merlin is successful.
Kyle is helpless.
Tobias is not successful.
Merlin is not federal.
Harlan is not federal.
Kyle is not successful.
Tobias is not helpless.If there is nobody who is not not federal, then Jessie is not successful and Harlan is not wild.
If there is at least one people who is both successful and attentive, then Merlin is zealous.
Someone is not attentive and successful if and only if he is wild and not helpless.
If someone is successful and not federal, then he is both not helpless and wild, and vice versa.
Someone is helpless if and only if he is wild.
It can be concluded that Kathryn is wild once knowing that Jessie is not successful.
If there is at least one people who is successful, then Kyle is not helpless.
If someone is not attentive or he is federal, then he is wild.
If there is someone who is not wild, then Tobias is not successful.
Someone who is both not wild and not attentive is always successful.
If Tobias is successful, then Jessie is not wild.
If there is at least one people who is both not helpless and not federal, then Merlin is not zealous. | Tobias is not federal. | neutral |
Crispin is helpless.
Jessie is not attentive.
Kyle is not federal.
Merlin is not attentive.
Harlan is not successful.
Merlin is successful.
Kyle is helpless.
Tobias is not successful.
Merlin is not federal.
Harlan is not federal.
Kyle is not successful.
Tobias is not helpless.If there is nobody who is not not federal, then Jessie is not successful and Harlan is not wild.
If there is at least one people who is both successful and attentive, then Merlin is zealous.
Someone is not attentive and successful if and only if he is wild and not helpless.
If someone is successful and not federal, then he is both not helpless and wild, and vice versa.
Someone is helpless if and only if he is wild.
It can be concluded that Kathryn is wild once knowing that Jessie is not successful.
If there is at least one people who is successful, then Kyle is not helpless.
If someone is not attentive or he is federal, then he is wild.
If there is someone who is not wild, then Tobias is not successful.
Someone who is both not wild and not attentive is always successful.
If Tobias is successful, then Jessie is not wild.
If there is at least one people who is both not helpless and not federal, then Merlin is not zealous. | Kyle is helpless. | self_contradiction |
Crispin is helpless.
Jessie is not attentive.
Kyle is not federal.
Merlin is not attentive.
Harlan is not successful.
Merlin is successful.
Kyle is helpless.
Tobias is not successful.
Merlin is not federal.
Harlan is not federal.
Kyle is not successful.
Tobias is not helpless.If there is nobody who is not not federal, then Jessie is not successful and Harlan is not wild.
If there is at least one people who is both successful and attentive, then Merlin is zealous.
Someone is not attentive and successful if and only if he is wild and not helpless.
If someone is successful and not federal, then he is both not helpless and wild, and vice versa.
Someone is helpless if and only if he is wild.
It can be concluded that Kathryn is wild once knowing that Jessie is not successful.
If there is at least one people who is successful, then Kyle is not helpless.
If someone is not attentive or he is federal, then he is wild.
If there is someone who is not wild, then Tobias is not successful.
Someone who is both not wild and not attentive is always successful.
If Tobias is successful, then Jessie is not wild.
If there is at least one people who is both not helpless and not federal, then Merlin is not zealous. | Kyle is not federal. | entailment |
Crispin is helpless.
Jessie is not attentive.
Kyle is not federal.
Merlin is not attentive.
Harlan is not successful.
Merlin is successful.
Kyle is helpless.
Tobias is not successful.
Merlin is not federal.
Harlan is not federal.
Kyle is not successful.
Tobias is not helpless.If there is nobody who is not not federal, then Jessie is not successful and Harlan is not wild.
If there is at least one people who is both successful and attentive, then Merlin is zealous.
Someone is not attentive and successful if and only if he is wild and not helpless.
If someone is successful and not federal, then he is both not helpless and wild, and vice versa.
Someone is helpless if and only if he is wild.
It can be concluded that Kathryn is wild once knowing that Jessie is not successful.
If there is at least one people who is successful, then Kyle is not helpless.
If someone is not attentive or he is federal, then he is wild.
If there is someone who is not wild, then Tobias is not successful.
Someone who is both not wild and not attentive is always successful.
If Tobias is successful, then Jessie is not wild.
If there is at least one people who is both not helpless and not federal, then Merlin is not zealous. | Kathryn is wild. | neutral |
Crispin is helpless.
Jessie is not attentive.
Kyle is not federal.
Merlin is not attentive.
Harlan is not successful.
Merlin is successful.
Kyle is helpless.
Tobias is not successful.
Merlin is not federal.
Harlan is not federal.
Kyle is not successful.
Tobias is not helpless.If there is nobody who is not not federal, then Jessie is not successful and Harlan is not wild.
If there is at least one people who is both successful and attentive, then Merlin is zealous.
Someone is not attentive and successful if and only if he is wild and not helpless.
If someone is successful and not federal, then he is both not helpless and wild, and vice versa.
Someone is helpless if and only if he is wild.
It can be concluded that Kathryn is wild once knowing that Jessie is not successful.
If there is at least one people who is successful, then Kyle is not helpless.
If someone is not attentive or he is federal, then he is wild.
If there is someone who is not wild, then Tobias is not successful.
Someone who is both not wild and not attentive is always successful.
If Tobias is successful, then Jessie is not wild.
If there is at least one people who is both not helpless and not federal, then Merlin is not zealous. | Jessie is wild. | entailment |
Crispin is helpless.
Jessie is not attentive.
Kyle is not federal.
Merlin is not attentive.
Harlan is not successful.
Merlin is successful.
Kyle is helpless.
Tobias is not successful.
Merlin is not federal.
Harlan is not federal.
Kyle is not successful.
Tobias is not helpless.If there is nobody who is not not federal, then Jessie is not successful and Harlan is not wild.
If there is at least one people who is both successful and attentive, then Merlin is zealous.
Someone is not attentive and successful if and only if he is wild and not helpless.
If someone is successful and not federal, then he is both not helpless and wild, and vice versa.
Someone is helpless if and only if he is wild.
It can be concluded that Kathryn is wild once knowing that Jessie is not successful.
If there is at least one people who is successful, then Kyle is not helpless.
If someone is not attentive or he is federal, then he is wild.
If there is someone who is not wild, then Tobias is not successful.
Someone who is both not wild and not attentive is always successful.
If Tobias is successful, then Jessie is not wild.
If there is at least one people who is both not helpless and not federal, then Merlin is not zealous. | Kyle is not successful. | self_contradiction |
Crispin is helpless.
Jessie is not attentive.
Kyle is not federal.
Merlin is not attentive.
Harlan is not successful.
Merlin is successful.
Kyle is helpless.
Tobias is not successful.
Merlin is not federal.
Harlan is not federal.
Kyle is not successful.
Tobias is not helpless.If there is nobody who is not not federal, then Jessie is not successful and Harlan is not wild.
If there is at least one people who is both successful and attentive, then Merlin is zealous.
Someone is not attentive and successful if and only if he is wild and not helpless.
If someone is successful and not federal, then he is both not helpless and wild, and vice versa.
Someone is helpless if and only if he is wild.
It can be concluded that Kathryn is wild once knowing that Jessie is not successful.
If there is at least one people who is successful, then Kyle is not helpless.
If someone is not attentive or he is federal, then he is wild.
If there is someone who is not wild, then Tobias is not successful.
Someone who is both not wild and not attentive is always successful.
If Tobias is successful, then Jessie is not wild.
If there is at least one people who is both not helpless and not federal, then Merlin is not zealous. | Kyle is attentive. | contradiction |
Crispin is helpless.
Jessie is not attentive.
Kyle is not federal.
Merlin is not attentive.
Harlan is not successful.
Merlin is successful.
Kyle is helpless.
Tobias is not successful.
Merlin is not federal.
Harlan is not federal.
Kyle is not successful.
Tobias is not helpless.If there is nobody who is not not federal, then Jessie is not successful and Harlan is not wild.
If there is at least one people who is both successful and attentive, then Merlin is zealous.
Someone is not attentive and successful if and only if he is wild and not helpless.
If someone is successful and not federal, then he is both not helpless and wild, and vice versa.
Someone is helpless if and only if he is wild.
It can be concluded that Kathryn is wild once knowing that Jessie is not successful.
If there is at least one people who is successful, then Kyle is not helpless.
If someone is not attentive or he is federal, then he is wild.
If there is someone who is not wild, then Tobias is not successful.
Someone who is both not wild and not attentive is always successful.
If Tobias is successful, then Jessie is not wild.
If there is at least one people who is both not helpless and not federal, then Merlin is not zealous. | Kathryn is not wild. | neutral |
Crispin is helpless.
Jessie is not attentive.
Kyle is not federal.
Merlin is not attentive.
Harlan is not successful.
Merlin is successful.
Kyle is helpless.
Tobias is not successful.
Merlin is not federal.
Harlan is not federal.
Kyle is not successful.
Tobias is not helpless.If there is nobody who is not not federal, then Jessie is not successful and Harlan is not wild.
If there is at least one people who is both successful and attentive, then Merlin is zealous.
Someone is not attentive and successful if and only if he is wild and not helpless.
If someone is successful and not federal, then he is both not helpless and wild, and vice versa.
Someone is helpless if and only if he is wild.
It can be concluded that Kathryn is wild once knowing that Jessie is not successful.
If there is at least one people who is successful, then Kyle is not helpless.
If someone is not attentive or he is federal, then he is wild.
If there is someone who is not wild, then Tobias is not successful.
Someone who is both not wild and not attentive is always successful.
If Tobias is successful, then Jessie is not wild.
If there is at least one people who is both not helpless and not federal, then Merlin is not zealous. | Kyle is not attentive. | entailment |
Colin is sexual.
Alexis is not annoying.
Alexis is not crooked.
Gardner is not crazy.
Horace is not sexual.
Gardner is not sexual.
Horace is annoying.
Colin is not crooked.
Mark is not annoying.
Mark is not crooked.
Colin is not crazy.
Curtis is annoying.If Colin is crooked or Mark is annoying, then Curtis is not sexual.
Someone who is eithor not sexual or crazy is always annoying.
Colin being sexual implies that Curtis is crazy and Mark is annoying.
Alexis being sexual implies that Gardner is crazy.
If Colin is sexual, then Alexis is petite.
If someone is crazy, then he is annoying.
Someone who is both petite and sexual is always annoying.
Someone is sexual and not crazy if and only if he is crooked and every.
If there is at least one people who is sexual, then Mark is crazy and Gilbert is crooked.
If there is someone who is both not annoying and every, then Mark is not petite and Gilbert is sexual.
As long as someone is not crooked, he is sexual and not petite.
If someone is not crooked and crazy, then he is not every and petite. | Gardner is sexual. | contradiction |
Colin is sexual.
Alexis is not annoying.
Alexis is not crooked.
Gardner is not crazy.
Horace is not sexual.
Gardner is not sexual.
Horace is annoying.
Colin is not crooked.
Mark is not annoying.
Mark is not crooked.
Colin is not crazy.
Curtis is annoying.If Colin is crooked or Mark is annoying, then Curtis is not sexual.
Someone who is eithor not sexual or crazy is always annoying.
Colin being sexual implies that Curtis is crazy and Mark is annoying.
Alexis being sexual implies that Gardner is crazy.
If Colin is sexual, then Alexis is petite.
If someone is crazy, then he is annoying.
Someone who is both petite and sexual is always annoying.
Someone is sexual and not crazy if and only if he is crooked and every.
If there is at least one people who is sexual, then Mark is crazy and Gilbert is crooked.
If there is someone who is both not annoying and every, then Mark is not petite and Gilbert is sexual.
As long as someone is not crooked, he is sexual and not petite.
If someone is not crooked and crazy, then he is not every and petite. | Colin is not petite. | entailment |
Colin is sexual.
Alexis is not annoying.
Alexis is not crooked.
Gardner is not crazy.
Horace is not sexual.
Gardner is not sexual.
Horace is annoying.
Colin is not crooked.
Mark is not annoying.
Mark is not crooked.
Colin is not crazy.
Curtis is annoying.If Colin is crooked or Mark is annoying, then Curtis is not sexual.
Someone who is eithor not sexual or crazy is always annoying.
Colin being sexual implies that Curtis is crazy and Mark is annoying.
Alexis being sexual implies that Gardner is crazy.
If Colin is sexual, then Alexis is petite.
If someone is crazy, then he is annoying.
Someone who is both petite and sexual is always annoying.
Someone is sexual and not crazy if and only if he is crooked and every.
If there is at least one people who is sexual, then Mark is crazy and Gilbert is crooked.
If there is someone who is both not annoying and every, then Mark is not petite and Gilbert is sexual.
As long as someone is not crooked, he is sexual and not petite.
If someone is not crooked and crazy, then he is not every and petite. | Gilbert is every. | neutral |
Colin is sexual.
Alexis is not annoying.
Alexis is not crooked.
Gardner is not crazy.
Horace is not sexual.
Gardner is not sexual.
Horace is annoying.
Colin is not crooked.
Mark is not annoying.
Mark is not crooked.
Colin is not crazy.
Curtis is annoying.If Colin is crooked or Mark is annoying, then Curtis is not sexual.
Someone who is eithor not sexual or crazy is always annoying.
Colin being sexual implies that Curtis is crazy and Mark is annoying.
Alexis being sexual implies that Gardner is crazy.
If Colin is sexual, then Alexis is petite.
If someone is crazy, then he is annoying.
Someone who is both petite and sexual is always annoying.
Someone is sexual and not crazy if and only if he is crooked and every.
If there is at least one people who is sexual, then Mark is crazy and Gilbert is crooked.
If there is someone who is both not annoying and every, then Mark is not petite and Gilbert is sexual.
As long as someone is not crooked, he is sexual and not petite.
If someone is not crooked and crazy, then he is not every and petite. | Mark is not crooked. | entailment |
Colin is sexual.
Alexis is not annoying.
Alexis is not crooked.
Gardner is not crazy.
Horace is not sexual.
Gardner is not sexual.
Horace is annoying.
Colin is not crooked.
Mark is not annoying.
Mark is not crooked.
Colin is not crazy.
Curtis is annoying.If Colin is crooked or Mark is annoying, then Curtis is not sexual.
Someone who is eithor not sexual or crazy is always annoying.
Colin being sexual implies that Curtis is crazy and Mark is annoying.
Alexis being sexual implies that Gardner is crazy.
If Colin is sexual, then Alexis is petite.
If someone is crazy, then he is annoying.
Someone who is both petite and sexual is always annoying.
Someone is sexual and not crazy if and only if he is crooked and every.
If there is at least one people who is sexual, then Mark is crazy and Gilbert is crooked.
If there is someone who is both not annoying and every, then Mark is not petite and Gilbert is sexual.
As long as someone is not crooked, he is sexual and not petite.
If someone is not crooked and crazy, then he is not every and petite. | Horace is not annoying. | contradiction |
Colin is sexual.
Alexis is not annoying.
Alexis is not crooked.
Gardner is not crazy.
Horace is not sexual.
Gardner is not sexual.
Horace is annoying.
Colin is not crooked.
Mark is not annoying.
Mark is not crooked.
Colin is not crazy.
Curtis is annoying.If Colin is crooked or Mark is annoying, then Curtis is not sexual.
Someone who is eithor not sexual or crazy is always annoying.
Colin being sexual implies that Curtis is crazy and Mark is annoying.
Alexis being sexual implies that Gardner is crazy.
If Colin is sexual, then Alexis is petite.
If someone is crazy, then he is annoying.
Someone who is both petite and sexual is always annoying.
Someone is sexual and not crazy if and only if he is crooked and every.
If there is at least one people who is sexual, then Mark is crazy and Gilbert is crooked.
If there is someone who is both not annoying and every, then Mark is not petite and Gilbert is sexual.
As long as someone is not crooked, he is sexual and not petite.
If someone is not crooked and crazy, then he is not every and petite. | Colin is petite. | contradiction |
Colin is sexual.
Alexis is not annoying.
Alexis is not crooked.
Gardner is not crazy.
Horace is not sexual.
Gardner is not sexual.
Horace is annoying.
Colin is not crooked.
Mark is not annoying.
Mark is not crooked.
Colin is not crazy.
Curtis is annoying.If Colin is crooked or Mark is annoying, then Curtis is not sexual.
Someone who is eithor not sexual or crazy is always annoying.
Colin being sexual implies that Curtis is crazy and Mark is annoying.
Alexis being sexual implies that Gardner is crazy.
If Colin is sexual, then Alexis is petite.
If someone is crazy, then he is annoying.
Someone who is both petite and sexual is always annoying.
Someone is sexual and not crazy if and only if he is crooked and every.
If there is at least one people who is sexual, then Mark is crazy and Gilbert is crooked.
If there is someone who is both not annoying and every, then Mark is not petite and Gilbert is sexual.
As long as someone is not crooked, he is sexual and not petite.
If someone is not crooked and crazy, then he is not every and petite. | Alexis is not crazy. | neutral |
Colin is sexual.
Alexis is not annoying.
Alexis is not crooked.
Gardner is not crazy.
Horace is not sexual.
Gardner is not sexual.
Horace is annoying.
Colin is not crooked.
Mark is not annoying.
Mark is not crooked.
Colin is not crazy.
Curtis is annoying.If Colin is crooked or Mark is annoying, then Curtis is not sexual.
Someone who is eithor not sexual or crazy is always annoying.
Colin being sexual implies that Curtis is crazy and Mark is annoying.
Alexis being sexual implies that Gardner is crazy.
If Colin is sexual, then Alexis is petite.
If someone is crazy, then he is annoying.
Someone who is both petite and sexual is always annoying.
Someone is sexual and not crazy if and only if he is crooked and every.
If there is at least one people who is sexual, then Mark is crazy and Gilbert is crooked.
If there is someone who is both not annoying and every, then Mark is not petite and Gilbert is sexual.
As long as someone is not crooked, he is sexual and not petite.
If someone is not crooked and crazy, then he is not every and petite. | Colin is annoying. | neutral |
Colin is sexual.
Alexis is not annoying.
Alexis is not crooked.
Gardner is not crazy.
Horace is not sexual.
Gardner is not sexual.
Horace is annoying.
Colin is not crooked.
Mark is not annoying.
Mark is not crooked.
Colin is not crazy.
Curtis is annoying.If Colin is crooked or Mark is annoying, then Curtis is not sexual.
Someone who is eithor not sexual or crazy is always annoying.
Colin being sexual implies that Curtis is crazy and Mark is annoying.
Alexis being sexual implies that Gardner is crazy.
If Colin is sexual, then Alexis is petite.
If someone is crazy, then he is annoying.
Someone who is both petite and sexual is always annoying.
Someone is sexual and not crazy if and only if he is crooked and every.
If there is at least one people who is sexual, then Mark is crazy and Gilbert is crooked.
If there is someone who is both not annoying and every, then Mark is not petite and Gilbert is sexual.
As long as someone is not crooked, he is sexual and not petite.
If someone is not crooked and crazy, then he is not every and petite. | Gardner is not crazy. | self_contradiction |
Colin is sexual.
Alexis is not annoying.
Alexis is not crooked.
Gardner is not crazy.
Horace is not sexual.
Gardner is not sexual.
Horace is annoying.
Colin is not crooked.
Mark is not annoying.
Mark is not crooked.
Colin is not crazy.
Curtis is annoying.If Colin is crooked or Mark is annoying, then Curtis is not sexual.
Someone who is eithor not sexual or crazy is always annoying.
Colin being sexual implies that Curtis is crazy and Mark is annoying.
Alexis being sexual implies that Gardner is crazy.
If Colin is sexual, then Alexis is petite.
If someone is crazy, then he is annoying.
Someone who is both petite and sexual is always annoying.
Someone is sexual and not crazy if and only if he is crooked and every.
If there is at least one people who is sexual, then Mark is crazy and Gilbert is crooked.
If there is someone who is both not annoying and every, then Mark is not petite and Gilbert is sexual.
As long as someone is not crooked, he is sexual and not petite.
If someone is not crooked and crazy, then he is not every and petite. | Gilbert is annoying. | neutral |
Colin is sexual.
Alexis is not annoying.
Alexis is not crooked.
Gardner is not crazy.
Horace is not sexual.
Gardner is not sexual.
Horace is annoying.
Colin is not crooked.
Mark is not annoying.
Mark is not crooked.
Colin is not crazy.
Curtis is annoying.If Colin is crooked or Mark is annoying, then Curtis is not sexual.
Someone who is eithor not sexual or crazy is always annoying.
Colin being sexual implies that Curtis is crazy and Mark is annoying.
Alexis being sexual implies that Gardner is crazy.
If Colin is sexual, then Alexis is petite.
If someone is crazy, then he is annoying.
Someone who is both petite and sexual is always annoying.
Someone is sexual and not crazy if and only if he is crooked and every.
If there is at least one people who is sexual, then Mark is crazy and Gilbert is crooked.
If there is someone who is both not annoying and every, then Mark is not petite and Gilbert is sexual.
As long as someone is not crooked, he is sexual and not petite.
If someone is not crooked and crazy, then he is not every and petite. | Alexis is annoying. | self_contradiction |
Colin is sexual.
Alexis is not annoying.
Alexis is not crooked.
Gardner is not crazy.
Horace is not sexual.
Gardner is not sexual.
Horace is annoying.
Colin is not crooked.
Mark is not annoying.
Mark is not crooked.
Colin is not crazy.
Curtis is annoying.If Colin is crooked or Mark is annoying, then Curtis is not sexual.
Someone who is eithor not sexual or crazy is always annoying.
Colin being sexual implies that Curtis is crazy and Mark is annoying.
Alexis being sexual implies that Gardner is crazy.
If Colin is sexual, then Alexis is petite.
If someone is crazy, then he is annoying.
Someone who is both petite and sexual is always annoying.
Someone is sexual and not crazy if and only if he is crooked and every.
If there is at least one people who is sexual, then Mark is crazy and Gilbert is crooked.
If there is someone who is both not annoying and every, then Mark is not petite and Gilbert is sexual.
As long as someone is not crooked, he is sexual and not petite.
If someone is not crooked and crazy, then he is not every and petite. | Alexis is crooked. | contradiction |
Colin is sexual.
Alexis is not annoying.
Alexis is not crooked.
Gardner is not crazy.
Horace is not sexual.
Gardner is not sexual.
Horace is annoying.
Colin is not crooked.
Mark is not annoying.
Mark is not crooked.
Colin is not crazy.
Curtis is annoying.If Colin is crooked or Mark is annoying, then Curtis is not sexual.
Someone who is eithor not sexual or crazy is always annoying.
Colin being sexual implies that Curtis is crazy and Mark is annoying.
Alexis being sexual implies that Gardner is crazy.
If Colin is sexual, then Alexis is petite.
If someone is crazy, then he is annoying.
Someone who is both petite and sexual is always annoying.
Someone is sexual and not crazy if and only if he is crooked and every.
If there is at least one people who is sexual, then Mark is crazy and Gilbert is crooked.
If there is someone who is both not annoying and every, then Mark is not petite and Gilbert is sexual.
As long as someone is not crooked, he is sexual and not petite.
If someone is not crooked and crazy, then he is not every and petite. | Mark is not every. | entailment |
Colin is sexual.
Alexis is not annoying.
Alexis is not crooked.
Gardner is not crazy.
Horace is not sexual.
Gardner is not sexual.
Horace is annoying.
Colin is not crooked.
Mark is not annoying.
Mark is not crooked.
Colin is not crazy.
Curtis is annoying.If Colin is crooked or Mark is annoying, then Curtis is not sexual.
Someone who is eithor not sexual or crazy is always annoying.
Colin being sexual implies that Curtis is crazy and Mark is annoying.
Alexis being sexual implies that Gardner is crazy.
If Colin is sexual, then Alexis is petite.
If someone is crazy, then he is annoying.
Someone who is both petite and sexual is always annoying.
Someone is sexual and not crazy if and only if he is crooked and every.
If there is at least one people who is sexual, then Mark is crazy and Gilbert is crooked.
If there is someone who is both not annoying and every, then Mark is not petite and Gilbert is sexual.
As long as someone is not crooked, he is sexual and not petite.
If someone is not crooked and crazy, then he is not every and petite. | Colin is not crazy. | entailment |
Colin is sexual.
Alexis is not annoying.
Alexis is not crooked.
Gardner is not crazy.
Horace is not sexual.
Gardner is not sexual.
Horace is annoying.
Colin is not crooked.
Mark is not annoying.
Mark is not crooked.
Colin is not crazy.
Curtis is annoying.If Colin is crooked or Mark is annoying, then Curtis is not sexual.
Someone who is eithor not sexual or crazy is always annoying.
Colin being sexual implies that Curtis is crazy and Mark is annoying.
Alexis being sexual implies that Gardner is crazy.
If Colin is sexual, then Alexis is petite.
If someone is crazy, then he is annoying.
Someone who is both petite and sexual is always annoying.
Someone is sexual and not crazy if and only if he is crooked and every.
If there is at least one people who is sexual, then Mark is crazy and Gilbert is crooked.
If there is someone who is both not annoying and every, then Mark is not petite and Gilbert is sexual.
As long as someone is not crooked, he is sexual and not petite.
If someone is not crooked and crazy, then he is not every and petite. | Mark is crooked. | contradiction |
Colin is sexual.
Alexis is not annoying.
Alexis is not crooked.
Gardner is not crazy.
Horace is not sexual.
Gardner is not sexual.
Horace is annoying.
Colin is not crooked.
Mark is not annoying.
Mark is not crooked.
Colin is not crazy.
Curtis is annoying.If Colin is crooked or Mark is annoying, then Curtis is not sexual.
Someone who is eithor not sexual or crazy is always annoying.
Colin being sexual implies that Curtis is crazy and Mark is annoying.
Alexis being sexual implies that Gardner is crazy.
If Colin is sexual, then Alexis is petite.
If someone is crazy, then he is annoying.
Someone who is both petite and sexual is always annoying.
Someone is sexual and not crazy if and only if he is crooked and every.
If there is at least one people who is sexual, then Mark is crazy and Gilbert is crooked.
If there is someone who is both not annoying and every, then Mark is not petite and Gilbert is sexual.
As long as someone is not crooked, he is sexual and not petite.
If someone is not crooked and crazy, then he is not every and petite. | Mark is petite. | self_contradiction |
Colin is sexual.
Alexis is not annoying.
Alexis is not crooked.
Gardner is not crazy.
Horace is not sexual.
Gardner is not sexual.
Horace is annoying.
Colin is not crooked.
Mark is not annoying.
Mark is not crooked.
Colin is not crazy.
Curtis is annoying.If Colin is crooked or Mark is annoying, then Curtis is not sexual.
Someone who is eithor not sexual or crazy is always annoying.
Colin being sexual implies that Curtis is crazy and Mark is annoying.
Alexis being sexual implies that Gardner is crazy.
If Colin is sexual, then Alexis is petite.
If someone is crazy, then he is annoying.
Someone who is both petite and sexual is always annoying.
Someone is sexual and not crazy if and only if he is crooked and every.
If there is at least one people who is sexual, then Mark is crazy and Gilbert is crooked.
If there is someone who is both not annoying and every, then Mark is not petite and Gilbert is sexual.
As long as someone is not crooked, he is sexual and not petite.
If someone is not crooked and crazy, then he is not every and petite. | Gardner is crazy. | self_contradiction |
Colin is sexual.
Alexis is not annoying.
Alexis is not crooked.
Gardner is not crazy.
Horace is not sexual.
Gardner is not sexual.
Horace is annoying.
Colin is not crooked.
Mark is not annoying.
Mark is not crooked.
Colin is not crazy.
Curtis is annoying.If Colin is crooked or Mark is annoying, then Curtis is not sexual.
Someone who is eithor not sexual or crazy is always annoying.
Colin being sexual implies that Curtis is crazy and Mark is annoying.
Alexis being sexual implies that Gardner is crazy.
If Colin is sexual, then Alexis is petite.
If someone is crazy, then he is annoying.
Someone who is both petite and sexual is always annoying.
Someone is sexual and not crazy if and only if he is crooked and every.
If there is at least one people who is sexual, then Mark is crazy and Gilbert is crooked.
If there is someone who is both not annoying and every, then Mark is not petite and Gilbert is sexual.
As long as someone is not crooked, he is sexual and not petite.
If someone is not crooked and crazy, then he is not every and petite. | Gilbert is not annoying. | neutral |
Colin is sexual.
Alexis is not annoying.
Alexis is not crooked.
Gardner is not crazy.
Horace is not sexual.
Gardner is not sexual.
Horace is annoying.
Colin is not crooked.
Mark is not annoying.
Mark is not crooked.
Colin is not crazy.
Curtis is annoying.If Colin is crooked or Mark is annoying, then Curtis is not sexual.
Someone who is eithor not sexual or crazy is always annoying.
Colin being sexual implies that Curtis is crazy and Mark is annoying.
Alexis being sexual implies that Gardner is crazy.
If Colin is sexual, then Alexis is petite.
If someone is crazy, then he is annoying.
Someone who is both petite and sexual is always annoying.
Someone is sexual and not crazy if and only if he is crooked and every.
If there is at least one people who is sexual, then Mark is crazy and Gilbert is crooked.
If there is someone who is both not annoying and every, then Mark is not petite and Gilbert is sexual.
As long as someone is not crooked, he is sexual and not petite.
If someone is not crooked and crazy, then he is not every and petite. | Alexis is not annoying. | self_contradiction |
Colin is sexual.
Alexis is not annoying.
Alexis is not crooked.
Gardner is not crazy.
Horace is not sexual.
Gardner is not sexual.
Horace is annoying.
Colin is not crooked.
Mark is not annoying.
Mark is not crooked.
Colin is not crazy.
Curtis is annoying.If Colin is crooked or Mark is annoying, then Curtis is not sexual.
Someone who is eithor not sexual or crazy is always annoying.
Colin being sexual implies that Curtis is crazy and Mark is annoying.
Alexis being sexual implies that Gardner is crazy.
If Colin is sexual, then Alexis is petite.
If someone is crazy, then he is annoying.
Someone who is both petite and sexual is always annoying.
Someone is sexual and not crazy if and only if he is crooked and every.
If there is at least one people who is sexual, then Mark is crazy and Gilbert is crooked.
If there is someone who is both not annoying and every, then Mark is not petite and Gilbert is sexual.
As long as someone is not crooked, he is sexual and not petite.
If someone is not crooked and crazy, then he is not every and petite. | Mark is sexual. | entailment |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.