premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Gale is sufficient.
Sean is not light.
Halden is not plain.
Sophie is not light.
Sherman is not compassionate.
Sophie is sufficient.
Gale is reserved.
Sherman is not friendly.
Gale is not compassionate.
Renfred is friendly.
Antonio is not sufficient.
Halden is not reserved.If Sherman is not sufficient and Antonio is compassionate, then Sophie is not friendly and Antonio is reserved.
If there is at least one people who is not compassionate, then Renfred is not reserved and Renfred is not light.
Someone who is not light is always both not sufficient and not reserved.
Sophie being compassionate implies that Renfred is sufficient.
If Halden is not reserved, then Gale is compassionate and Sophie is sufficient.
If there is someone who is either not friendly or sufficient, then Renfred is not compassionate.
Antonio being not plain is equivalent to Sophie being sufficient and Halden being reserved.
Gale being sufficient is equivalent to Halden being not reserved and Halden being compassionate.
If Halden is not sufficient, then Gale is friendly and Halden is not compassionate, and vice versa.
Someone is not reserved if and only if he is plain.
As long as someone is sufficient and plain, he is not friendly and light.
All not reserved people are not friendly. | Renfred is compassionate. | contradiction |
Gale is sufficient.
Sean is not light.
Halden is not plain.
Sophie is not light.
Sherman is not compassionate.
Sophie is sufficient.
Gale is reserved.
Sherman is not friendly.
Gale is not compassionate.
Renfred is friendly.
Antonio is not sufficient.
Halden is not reserved.If Sherman is not sufficient and Antonio is compassionate, then Sophie is not friendly and Antonio is reserved.
If there is at least one people who is not compassionate, then Renfred is not reserved and Renfred is not light.
Someone who is not light is always both not sufficient and not reserved.
Sophie being compassionate implies that Renfred is sufficient.
If Halden is not reserved, then Gale is compassionate and Sophie is sufficient.
If there is someone who is either not friendly or sufficient, then Renfred is not compassionate.
Antonio being not plain is equivalent to Sophie being sufficient and Halden being reserved.
Gale being sufficient is equivalent to Halden being not reserved and Halden being compassionate.
If Halden is not sufficient, then Gale is friendly and Halden is not compassionate, and vice versa.
Someone is not reserved if and only if he is plain.
As long as someone is sufficient and plain, he is not friendly and light.
All not reserved people are not friendly. | Sean is friendly. | contradiction |
Gale is sufficient.
Sean is not light.
Halden is not plain.
Sophie is not light.
Sherman is not compassionate.
Sophie is sufficient.
Gale is reserved.
Sherman is not friendly.
Gale is not compassionate.
Renfred is friendly.
Antonio is not sufficient.
Halden is not reserved.If Sherman is not sufficient and Antonio is compassionate, then Sophie is not friendly and Antonio is reserved.
If there is at least one people who is not compassionate, then Renfred is not reserved and Renfred is not light.
Someone who is not light is always both not sufficient and not reserved.
Sophie being compassionate implies that Renfred is sufficient.
If Halden is not reserved, then Gale is compassionate and Sophie is sufficient.
If there is someone who is either not friendly or sufficient, then Renfred is not compassionate.
Antonio being not plain is equivalent to Sophie being sufficient and Halden being reserved.
Gale being sufficient is equivalent to Halden being not reserved and Halden being compassionate.
If Halden is not sufficient, then Gale is friendly and Halden is not compassionate, and vice versa.
Someone is not reserved if and only if he is plain.
As long as someone is sufficient and plain, he is not friendly and light.
All not reserved people are not friendly. | Gale is not compassionate. | self_contradiction |
Gale is sufficient.
Sean is not light.
Halden is not plain.
Sophie is not light.
Sherman is not compassionate.
Sophie is sufficient.
Gale is reserved.
Sherman is not friendly.
Gale is not compassionate.
Renfred is friendly.
Antonio is not sufficient.
Halden is not reserved.If Sherman is not sufficient and Antonio is compassionate, then Sophie is not friendly and Antonio is reserved.
If there is at least one people who is not compassionate, then Renfred is not reserved and Renfred is not light.
Someone who is not light is always both not sufficient and not reserved.
Sophie being compassionate implies that Renfred is sufficient.
If Halden is not reserved, then Gale is compassionate and Sophie is sufficient.
If there is someone who is either not friendly or sufficient, then Renfred is not compassionate.
Antonio being not plain is equivalent to Sophie being sufficient and Halden being reserved.
Gale being sufficient is equivalent to Halden being not reserved and Halden being compassionate.
If Halden is not sufficient, then Gale is friendly and Halden is not compassionate, and vice versa.
Someone is not reserved if and only if he is plain.
As long as someone is sufficient and plain, he is not friendly and light.
All not reserved people are not friendly. | Halden is plain. | self_contradiction |
Gale is sufficient.
Sean is not light.
Halden is not plain.
Sophie is not light.
Sherman is not compassionate.
Sophie is sufficient.
Gale is reserved.
Sherman is not friendly.
Gale is not compassionate.
Renfred is friendly.
Antonio is not sufficient.
Halden is not reserved.If Sherman is not sufficient and Antonio is compassionate, then Sophie is not friendly and Antonio is reserved.
If there is at least one people who is not compassionate, then Renfred is not reserved and Renfred is not light.
Someone who is not light is always both not sufficient and not reserved.
Sophie being compassionate implies that Renfred is sufficient.
If Halden is not reserved, then Gale is compassionate and Sophie is sufficient.
If there is someone who is either not friendly or sufficient, then Renfred is not compassionate.
Antonio being not plain is equivalent to Sophie being sufficient and Halden being reserved.
Gale being sufficient is equivalent to Halden being not reserved and Halden being compassionate.
If Halden is not sufficient, then Gale is friendly and Halden is not compassionate, and vice versa.
Someone is not reserved if and only if he is plain.
As long as someone is sufficient and plain, he is not friendly and light.
All not reserved people are not friendly. | Sophie is light. | self_contradiction |
Gale is sufficient.
Sean is not light.
Halden is not plain.
Sophie is not light.
Sherman is not compassionate.
Sophie is sufficient.
Gale is reserved.
Sherman is not friendly.
Gale is not compassionate.
Renfred is friendly.
Antonio is not sufficient.
Halden is not reserved.If Sherman is not sufficient and Antonio is compassionate, then Sophie is not friendly and Antonio is reserved.
If there is at least one people who is not compassionate, then Renfred is not reserved and Renfred is not light.
Someone who is not light is always both not sufficient and not reserved.
Sophie being compassionate implies that Renfred is sufficient.
If Halden is not reserved, then Gale is compassionate and Sophie is sufficient.
If there is someone who is either not friendly or sufficient, then Renfred is not compassionate.
Antonio being not plain is equivalent to Sophie being sufficient and Halden being reserved.
Gale being sufficient is equivalent to Halden being not reserved and Halden being compassionate.
If Halden is not sufficient, then Gale is friendly and Halden is not compassionate, and vice versa.
Someone is not reserved if and only if he is plain.
As long as someone is sufficient and plain, he is not friendly and light.
All not reserved people are not friendly. | Antonio is not plain. | neutral |
Gale is sufficient.
Sean is not light.
Halden is not plain.
Sophie is not light.
Sherman is not compassionate.
Sophie is sufficient.
Gale is reserved.
Sherman is not friendly.
Gale is not compassionate.
Renfred is friendly.
Antonio is not sufficient.
Halden is not reserved.If Sherman is not sufficient and Antonio is compassionate, then Sophie is not friendly and Antonio is reserved.
If there is at least one people who is not compassionate, then Renfred is not reserved and Renfred is not light.
Someone who is not light is always both not sufficient and not reserved.
Sophie being compassionate implies that Renfred is sufficient.
If Halden is not reserved, then Gale is compassionate and Sophie is sufficient.
If there is someone who is either not friendly or sufficient, then Renfred is not compassionate.
Antonio being not plain is equivalent to Sophie being sufficient and Halden being reserved.
Gale being sufficient is equivalent to Halden being not reserved and Halden being compassionate.
If Halden is not sufficient, then Gale is friendly and Halden is not compassionate, and vice versa.
Someone is not reserved if and only if he is plain.
As long as someone is sufficient and plain, he is not friendly and light.
All not reserved people are not friendly. | Sherman is not light. | neutral |
Gale is sufficient.
Sean is not light.
Halden is not plain.
Sophie is not light.
Sherman is not compassionate.
Sophie is sufficient.
Gale is reserved.
Sherman is not friendly.
Gale is not compassionate.
Renfred is friendly.
Antonio is not sufficient.
Halden is not reserved.If Sherman is not sufficient and Antonio is compassionate, then Sophie is not friendly and Antonio is reserved.
If there is at least one people who is not compassionate, then Renfred is not reserved and Renfred is not light.
Someone who is not light is always both not sufficient and not reserved.
Sophie being compassionate implies that Renfred is sufficient.
If Halden is not reserved, then Gale is compassionate and Sophie is sufficient.
If there is someone who is either not friendly or sufficient, then Renfred is not compassionate.
Antonio being not plain is equivalent to Sophie being sufficient and Halden being reserved.
Gale being sufficient is equivalent to Halden being not reserved and Halden being compassionate.
If Halden is not sufficient, then Gale is friendly and Halden is not compassionate, and vice versa.
Someone is not reserved if and only if he is plain.
As long as someone is sufficient and plain, he is not friendly and light.
All not reserved people are not friendly. | Sean is not sufficient. | entailment |
Gale is sufficient.
Sean is not light.
Halden is not plain.
Sophie is not light.
Sherman is not compassionate.
Sophie is sufficient.
Gale is reserved.
Sherman is not friendly.
Gale is not compassionate.
Renfred is friendly.
Antonio is not sufficient.
Halden is not reserved.If Sherman is not sufficient and Antonio is compassionate, then Sophie is not friendly and Antonio is reserved.
If there is at least one people who is not compassionate, then Renfred is not reserved and Renfred is not light.
Someone who is not light is always both not sufficient and not reserved.
Sophie being compassionate implies that Renfred is sufficient.
If Halden is not reserved, then Gale is compassionate and Sophie is sufficient.
If there is someone who is either not friendly or sufficient, then Renfred is not compassionate.
Antonio being not plain is equivalent to Sophie being sufficient and Halden being reserved.
Gale being sufficient is equivalent to Halden being not reserved and Halden being compassionate.
If Halden is not sufficient, then Gale is friendly and Halden is not compassionate, and vice versa.
Someone is not reserved if and only if he is plain.
As long as someone is sufficient and plain, he is not friendly and light.
All not reserved people are not friendly. | Sherman is not compassionate. | entailment |
Gale is sufficient.
Sean is not light.
Halden is not plain.
Sophie is not light.
Sherman is not compassionate.
Sophie is sufficient.
Gale is reserved.
Sherman is not friendly.
Gale is not compassionate.
Renfred is friendly.
Antonio is not sufficient.
Halden is not reserved.If Sherman is not sufficient and Antonio is compassionate, then Sophie is not friendly and Antonio is reserved.
If there is at least one people who is not compassionate, then Renfred is not reserved and Renfred is not light.
Someone who is not light is always both not sufficient and not reserved.
Sophie being compassionate implies that Renfred is sufficient.
If Halden is not reserved, then Gale is compassionate and Sophie is sufficient.
If there is someone who is either not friendly or sufficient, then Renfred is not compassionate.
Antonio being not plain is equivalent to Sophie being sufficient and Halden being reserved.
Gale being sufficient is equivalent to Halden being not reserved and Halden being compassionate.
If Halden is not sufficient, then Gale is friendly and Halden is not compassionate, and vice versa.
Someone is not reserved if and only if he is plain.
As long as someone is sufficient and plain, he is not friendly and light.
All not reserved people are not friendly. | Sherman is not reserved. | neutral |
Gale is sufficient.
Sean is not light.
Halden is not plain.
Sophie is not light.
Sherman is not compassionate.
Sophie is sufficient.
Gale is reserved.
Sherman is not friendly.
Gale is not compassionate.
Renfred is friendly.
Antonio is not sufficient.
Halden is not reserved.If Sherman is not sufficient and Antonio is compassionate, then Sophie is not friendly and Antonio is reserved.
If there is at least one people who is not compassionate, then Renfred is not reserved and Renfred is not light.
Someone who is not light is always both not sufficient and not reserved.
Sophie being compassionate implies that Renfred is sufficient.
If Halden is not reserved, then Gale is compassionate and Sophie is sufficient.
If there is someone who is either not friendly or sufficient, then Renfred is not compassionate.
Antonio being not plain is equivalent to Sophie being sufficient and Halden being reserved.
Gale being sufficient is equivalent to Halden being not reserved and Halden being compassionate.
If Halden is not sufficient, then Gale is friendly and Halden is not compassionate, and vice versa.
Someone is not reserved if and only if he is plain.
As long as someone is sufficient and plain, he is not friendly and light.
All not reserved people are not friendly. | Sophie is compassionate. | neutral |
Gale is sufficient.
Sean is not light.
Halden is not plain.
Sophie is not light.
Sherman is not compassionate.
Sophie is sufficient.
Gale is reserved.
Sherman is not friendly.
Gale is not compassionate.
Renfred is friendly.
Antonio is not sufficient.
Halden is not reserved.If Sherman is not sufficient and Antonio is compassionate, then Sophie is not friendly and Antonio is reserved.
If there is at least one people who is not compassionate, then Renfred is not reserved and Renfred is not light.
Someone who is not light is always both not sufficient and not reserved.
Sophie being compassionate implies that Renfred is sufficient.
If Halden is not reserved, then Gale is compassionate and Sophie is sufficient.
If there is someone who is either not friendly or sufficient, then Renfred is not compassionate.
Antonio being not plain is equivalent to Sophie being sufficient and Halden being reserved.
Gale being sufficient is equivalent to Halden being not reserved and Halden being compassionate.
If Halden is not sufficient, then Gale is friendly and Halden is not compassionate, and vice versa.
Someone is not reserved if and only if he is plain.
As long as someone is sufficient and plain, he is not friendly and light.
All not reserved people are not friendly. | Antonio is sufficient. | contradiction |
Gale is sufficient.
Sean is not light.
Halden is not plain.
Sophie is not light.
Sherman is not compassionate.
Sophie is sufficient.
Gale is reserved.
Sherman is not friendly.
Gale is not compassionate.
Renfred is friendly.
Antonio is not sufficient.
Halden is not reserved.If Sherman is not sufficient and Antonio is compassionate, then Sophie is not friendly and Antonio is reserved.
If there is at least one people who is not compassionate, then Renfred is not reserved and Renfred is not light.
Someone who is not light is always both not sufficient and not reserved.
Sophie being compassionate implies that Renfred is sufficient.
If Halden is not reserved, then Gale is compassionate and Sophie is sufficient.
If there is someone who is either not friendly or sufficient, then Renfred is not compassionate.
Antonio being not plain is equivalent to Sophie being sufficient and Halden being reserved.
Gale being sufficient is equivalent to Halden being not reserved and Halden being compassionate.
If Halden is not sufficient, then Gale is friendly and Halden is not compassionate, and vice versa.
Someone is not reserved if and only if he is plain.
As long as someone is sufficient and plain, he is not friendly and light.
All not reserved people are not friendly. | Sophie is not friendly. | entailment |
Gale is sufficient.
Sean is not light.
Halden is not plain.
Sophie is not light.
Sherman is not compassionate.
Sophie is sufficient.
Gale is reserved.
Sherman is not friendly.
Gale is not compassionate.
Renfred is friendly.
Antonio is not sufficient.
Halden is not reserved.If Sherman is not sufficient and Antonio is compassionate, then Sophie is not friendly and Antonio is reserved.
If there is at least one people who is not compassionate, then Renfred is not reserved and Renfred is not light.
Someone who is not light is always both not sufficient and not reserved.
Sophie being compassionate implies that Renfred is sufficient.
If Halden is not reserved, then Gale is compassionate and Sophie is sufficient.
If there is someone who is either not friendly or sufficient, then Renfred is not compassionate.
Antonio being not plain is equivalent to Sophie being sufficient and Halden being reserved.
Gale being sufficient is equivalent to Halden being not reserved and Halden being compassionate.
If Halden is not sufficient, then Gale is friendly and Halden is not compassionate, and vice versa.
Someone is not reserved if and only if he is plain.
As long as someone is sufficient and plain, he is not friendly and light.
All not reserved people are not friendly. | Renfred is not plain. | contradiction |
Gale is sufficient.
Sean is not light.
Halden is not plain.
Sophie is not light.
Sherman is not compassionate.
Sophie is sufficient.
Gale is reserved.
Sherman is not friendly.
Gale is not compassionate.
Renfred is friendly.
Antonio is not sufficient.
Halden is not reserved.If Sherman is not sufficient and Antonio is compassionate, then Sophie is not friendly and Antonio is reserved.
If there is at least one people who is not compassionate, then Renfred is not reserved and Renfred is not light.
Someone who is not light is always both not sufficient and not reserved.
Sophie being compassionate implies that Renfred is sufficient.
If Halden is not reserved, then Gale is compassionate and Sophie is sufficient.
If there is someone who is either not friendly or sufficient, then Renfred is not compassionate.
Antonio being not plain is equivalent to Sophie being sufficient and Halden being reserved.
Gale being sufficient is equivalent to Halden being not reserved and Halden being compassionate.
If Halden is not sufficient, then Gale is friendly and Halden is not compassionate, and vice versa.
Someone is not reserved if and only if he is plain.
As long as someone is sufficient and plain, he is not friendly and light.
All not reserved people are not friendly. | Sherman is sufficient. | neutral |
Gale is sufficient.
Sean is not light.
Halden is not plain.
Sophie is not light.
Sherman is not compassionate.
Sophie is sufficient.
Gale is reserved.
Sherman is not friendly.
Gale is not compassionate.
Renfred is friendly.
Antonio is not sufficient.
Halden is not reserved.If Sherman is not sufficient and Antonio is compassionate, then Sophie is not friendly and Antonio is reserved.
If there is at least one people who is not compassionate, then Renfred is not reserved and Renfred is not light.
Someone who is not light is always both not sufficient and not reserved.
Sophie being compassionate implies that Renfred is sufficient.
If Halden is not reserved, then Gale is compassionate and Sophie is sufficient.
If there is someone who is either not friendly or sufficient, then Renfred is not compassionate.
Antonio being not plain is equivalent to Sophie being sufficient and Halden being reserved.
Gale being sufficient is equivalent to Halden being not reserved and Halden being compassionate.
If Halden is not sufficient, then Gale is friendly and Halden is not compassionate, and vice versa.
Someone is not reserved if and only if he is plain.
As long as someone is sufficient and plain, he is not friendly and light.
All not reserved people are not friendly. | Sophie is not reserved. | entailment |
Gale is sufficient.
Sean is not light.
Halden is not plain.
Sophie is not light.
Sherman is not compassionate.
Sophie is sufficient.
Gale is reserved.
Sherman is not friendly.
Gale is not compassionate.
Renfred is friendly.
Antonio is not sufficient.
Halden is not reserved.If Sherman is not sufficient and Antonio is compassionate, then Sophie is not friendly and Antonio is reserved.
If there is at least one people who is not compassionate, then Renfred is not reserved and Renfred is not light.
Someone who is not light is always both not sufficient and not reserved.
Sophie being compassionate implies that Renfred is sufficient.
If Halden is not reserved, then Gale is compassionate and Sophie is sufficient.
If there is someone who is either not friendly or sufficient, then Renfred is not compassionate.
Antonio being not plain is equivalent to Sophie being sufficient and Halden being reserved.
Gale being sufficient is equivalent to Halden being not reserved and Halden being compassionate.
If Halden is not sufficient, then Gale is friendly and Halden is not compassionate, and vice versa.
Someone is not reserved if and only if he is plain.
As long as someone is sufficient and plain, he is not friendly and light.
All not reserved people are not friendly. | Gale is compassionate. | self_contradiction |
Gale is sufficient.
Sean is not light.
Halden is not plain.
Sophie is not light.
Sherman is not compassionate.
Sophie is sufficient.
Gale is reserved.
Sherman is not friendly.
Gale is not compassionate.
Renfred is friendly.
Antonio is not sufficient.
Halden is not reserved.If Sherman is not sufficient and Antonio is compassionate, then Sophie is not friendly and Antonio is reserved.
If there is at least one people who is not compassionate, then Renfred is not reserved and Renfred is not light.
Someone who is not light is always both not sufficient and not reserved.
Sophie being compassionate implies that Renfred is sufficient.
If Halden is not reserved, then Gale is compassionate and Sophie is sufficient.
If there is someone who is either not friendly or sufficient, then Renfred is not compassionate.
Antonio being not plain is equivalent to Sophie being sufficient and Halden being reserved.
Gale being sufficient is equivalent to Halden being not reserved and Halden being compassionate.
If Halden is not sufficient, then Gale is friendly and Halden is not compassionate, and vice versa.
Someone is not reserved if and only if he is plain.
As long as someone is sufficient and plain, he is not friendly and light.
All not reserved people are not friendly. | Gale is reserved. | entailment |
Gale is sufficient.
Sean is not light.
Halden is not plain.
Sophie is not light.
Sherman is not compassionate.
Sophie is sufficient.
Gale is reserved.
Sherman is not friendly.
Gale is not compassionate.
Renfred is friendly.
Antonio is not sufficient.
Halden is not reserved.If Sherman is not sufficient and Antonio is compassionate, then Sophie is not friendly and Antonio is reserved.
If there is at least one people who is not compassionate, then Renfred is not reserved and Renfred is not light.
Someone who is not light is always both not sufficient and not reserved.
Sophie being compassionate implies that Renfred is sufficient.
If Halden is not reserved, then Gale is compassionate and Sophie is sufficient.
If there is someone who is either not friendly or sufficient, then Renfred is not compassionate.
Antonio being not plain is equivalent to Sophie being sufficient and Halden being reserved.
Gale being sufficient is equivalent to Halden being not reserved and Halden being compassionate.
If Halden is not sufficient, then Gale is friendly and Halden is not compassionate, and vice versa.
Someone is not reserved if and only if he is plain.
As long as someone is sufficient and plain, he is not friendly and light.
All not reserved people are not friendly. | Renfred is light. | contradiction |
Gale is sufficient.
Sean is not light.
Halden is not plain.
Sophie is not light.
Sherman is not compassionate.
Sophie is sufficient.
Gale is reserved.
Sherman is not friendly.
Gale is not compassionate.
Renfred is friendly.
Antonio is not sufficient.
Halden is not reserved.If Sherman is not sufficient and Antonio is compassionate, then Sophie is not friendly and Antonio is reserved.
If there is at least one people who is not compassionate, then Renfred is not reserved and Renfred is not light.
Someone who is not light is always both not sufficient and not reserved.
Sophie being compassionate implies that Renfred is sufficient.
If Halden is not reserved, then Gale is compassionate and Sophie is sufficient.
If there is someone who is either not friendly or sufficient, then Renfred is not compassionate.
Antonio being not plain is equivalent to Sophie being sufficient and Halden being reserved.
Gale being sufficient is equivalent to Halden being not reserved and Halden being compassionate.
If Halden is not sufficient, then Gale is friendly and Halden is not compassionate, and vice versa.
Someone is not reserved if and only if he is plain.
As long as someone is sufficient and plain, he is not friendly and light.
All not reserved people are not friendly. | Sophie is sufficient. | self_contradiction |
Alfred is critical.
Hanna is strict.
Hanna is skinny.
Mark is skinny.
Harmony is not skinny.
Alfred is skinny.
Brent is strict.
Hope is skinny.
Brent is unpleasant.
Mark is not blushing.
Hanna is magnificent.
Grant is not skinny.If Grant is not magnificent or Brent is critical, then Hanna is blushing.
Someone who is eithor not blushing or unpleasant is always not magnificent.
If there is at least one people who is magnificent, then Hope is not strict and Alfred is not skinny.
If there is at least one people who is not unpleasant, then Mark is magnificent.
If someone is magnificent, then he is strict.
It can be concluded that Mark is magnificent once knowing that Alfred is not blushing or Mark is not strict.
As long as someone is either not critical or strict, he is unpleasant and skinny.
Mark being critical implies that Harmony is not skinny.
If Hope is magnificent and Alfred is not unpleasant, then Hanna is not critical.
Grant is strict if and only if Brent is not blushing.
Someone who is both skinny and critical is always not blushing.
If all people are blushing, then Harmony is not unpleasant and Hope is strict. | Hope is skinny. | entailment |
Alfred is critical.
Hanna is strict.
Hanna is skinny.
Mark is skinny.
Harmony is not skinny.
Alfred is skinny.
Brent is strict.
Hope is skinny.
Brent is unpleasant.
Mark is not blushing.
Hanna is magnificent.
Grant is not skinny.If Grant is not magnificent or Brent is critical, then Hanna is blushing.
Someone who is eithor not blushing or unpleasant is always not magnificent.
If there is at least one people who is magnificent, then Hope is not strict and Alfred is not skinny.
If there is at least one people who is not unpleasant, then Mark is magnificent.
If someone is magnificent, then he is strict.
It can be concluded that Mark is magnificent once knowing that Alfred is not blushing or Mark is not strict.
As long as someone is either not critical or strict, he is unpleasant and skinny.
Mark being critical implies that Harmony is not skinny.
If Hope is magnificent and Alfred is not unpleasant, then Hanna is not critical.
Grant is strict if and only if Brent is not blushing.
Someone who is both skinny and critical is always not blushing.
If all people are blushing, then Harmony is not unpleasant and Hope is strict. | Hope is not skinny. | contradiction |
Alfred is critical.
Hanna is strict.
Hanna is skinny.
Mark is skinny.
Harmony is not skinny.
Alfred is skinny.
Brent is strict.
Hope is skinny.
Brent is unpleasant.
Mark is not blushing.
Hanna is magnificent.
Grant is not skinny.If Grant is not magnificent or Brent is critical, then Hanna is blushing.
Someone who is eithor not blushing or unpleasant is always not magnificent.
If there is at least one people who is magnificent, then Hope is not strict and Alfred is not skinny.
If there is at least one people who is not unpleasant, then Mark is magnificent.
If someone is magnificent, then he is strict.
It can be concluded that Mark is magnificent once knowing that Alfred is not blushing or Mark is not strict.
As long as someone is either not critical or strict, he is unpleasant and skinny.
Mark being critical implies that Harmony is not skinny.
If Hope is magnificent and Alfred is not unpleasant, then Hanna is not critical.
Grant is strict if and only if Brent is not blushing.
Someone who is both skinny and critical is always not blushing.
If all people are blushing, then Harmony is not unpleasant and Hope is strict. | Hanna is critical. | neutral |
Alfred is critical.
Hanna is strict.
Hanna is skinny.
Mark is skinny.
Harmony is not skinny.
Alfred is skinny.
Brent is strict.
Hope is skinny.
Brent is unpleasant.
Mark is not blushing.
Hanna is magnificent.
Grant is not skinny.If Grant is not magnificent or Brent is critical, then Hanna is blushing.
Someone who is eithor not blushing or unpleasant is always not magnificent.
If there is at least one people who is magnificent, then Hope is not strict and Alfred is not skinny.
If there is at least one people who is not unpleasant, then Mark is magnificent.
If someone is magnificent, then he is strict.
It can be concluded that Mark is magnificent once knowing that Alfred is not blushing or Mark is not strict.
As long as someone is either not critical or strict, he is unpleasant and skinny.
Mark being critical implies that Harmony is not skinny.
If Hope is magnificent and Alfred is not unpleasant, then Hanna is not critical.
Grant is strict if and only if Brent is not blushing.
Someone who is both skinny and critical is always not blushing.
If all people are blushing, then Harmony is not unpleasant and Hope is strict. | Mark is magnificent. | self_contradiction |
Alfred is critical.
Hanna is strict.
Hanna is skinny.
Mark is skinny.
Harmony is not skinny.
Alfred is skinny.
Brent is strict.
Hope is skinny.
Brent is unpleasant.
Mark is not blushing.
Hanna is magnificent.
Grant is not skinny.If Grant is not magnificent or Brent is critical, then Hanna is blushing.
Someone who is eithor not blushing or unpleasant is always not magnificent.
If there is at least one people who is magnificent, then Hope is not strict and Alfred is not skinny.
If there is at least one people who is not unpleasant, then Mark is magnificent.
If someone is magnificent, then he is strict.
It can be concluded that Mark is magnificent once knowing that Alfred is not blushing or Mark is not strict.
As long as someone is either not critical or strict, he is unpleasant and skinny.
Mark being critical implies that Harmony is not skinny.
If Hope is magnificent and Alfred is not unpleasant, then Hanna is not critical.
Grant is strict if and only if Brent is not blushing.
Someone who is both skinny and critical is always not blushing.
If all people are blushing, then Harmony is not unpleasant and Hope is strict. | Mark is not strict. | contradiction |
Alfred is critical.
Hanna is strict.
Hanna is skinny.
Mark is skinny.
Harmony is not skinny.
Alfred is skinny.
Brent is strict.
Hope is skinny.
Brent is unpleasant.
Mark is not blushing.
Hanna is magnificent.
Grant is not skinny.If Grant is not magnificent or Brent is critical, then Hanna is blushing.
Someone who is eithor not blushing or unpleasant is always not magnificent.
If there is at least one people who is magnificent, then Hope is not strict and Alfred is not skinny.
If there is at least one people who is not unpleasant, then Mark is magnificent.
If someone is magnificent, then he is strict.
It can be concluded that Mark is magnificent once knowing that Alfred is not blushing or Mark is not strict.
As long as someone is either not critical or strict, he is unpleasant and skinny.
Mark being critical implies that Harmony is not skinny.
If Hope is magnificent and Alfred is not unpleasant, then Hanna is not critical.
Grant is strict if and only if Brent is not blushing.
Someone who is both skinny and critical is always not blushing.
If all people are blushing, then Harmony is not unpleasant and Hope is strict. | Hanna is strict. | entailment |
Alfred is critical.
Hanna is strict.
Hanna is skinny.
Mark is skinny.
Harmony is not skinny.
Alfred is skinny.
Brent is strict.
Hope is skinny.
Brent is unpleasant.
Mark is not blushing.
Hanna is magnificent.
Grant is not skinny.If Grant is not magnificent or Brent is critical, then Hanna is blushing.
Someone who is eithor not blushing or unpleasant is always not magnificent.
If there is at least one people who is magnificent, then Hope is not strict and Alfred is not skinny.
If there is at least one people who is not unpleasant, then Mark is magnificent.
If someone is magnificent, then he is strict.
It can be concluded that Mark is magnificent once knowing that Alfred is not blushing or Mark is not strict.
As long as someone is either not critical or strict, he is unpleasant and skinny.
Mark being critical implies that Harmony is not skinny.
If Hope is magnificent and Alfred is not unpleasant, then Hanna is not critical.
Grant is strict if and only if Brent is not blushing.
Someone who is both skinny and critical is always not blushing.
If all people are blushing, then Harmony is not unpleasant and Hope is strict. | Alfred is skinny. | self_contradiction |
Alfred is critical.
Hanna is strict.
Hanna is skinny.
Mark is skinny.
Harmony is not skinny.
Alfred is skinny.
Brent is strict.
Hope is skinny.
Brent is unpleasant.
Mark is not blushing.
Hanna is magnificent.
Grant is not skinny.If Grant is not magnificent or Brent is critical, then Hanna is blushing.
Someone who is eithor not blushing or unpleasant is always not magnificent.
If there is at least one people who is magnificent, then Hope is not strict and Alfred is not skinny.
If there is at least one people who is not unpleasant, then Mark is magnificent.
If someone is magnificent, then he is strict.
It can be concluded that Mark is magnificent once knowing that Alfred is not blushing or Mark is not strict.
As long as someone is either not critical or strict, he is unpleasant and skinny.
Mark being critical implies that Harmony is not skinny.
If Hope is magnificent and Alfred is not unpleasant, then Hanna is not critical.
Grant is strict if and only if Brent is not blushing.
Someone who is both skinny and critical is always not blushing.
If all people are blushing, then Harmony is not unpleasant and Hope is strict. | Hanna is unpleasant. | entailment |
Alfred is critical.
Hanna is strict.
Hanna is skinny.
Mark is skinny.
Harmony is not skinny.
Alfred is skinny.
Brent is strict.
Hope is skinny.
Brent is unpleasant.
Mark is not blushing.
Hanna is magnificent.
Grant is not skinny.If Grant is not magnificent or Brent is critical, then Hanna is blushing.
Someone who is eithor not blushing or unpleasant is always not magnificent.
If there is at least one people who is magnificent, then Hope is not strict and Alfred is not skinny.
If there is at least one people who is not unpleasant, then Mark is magnificent.
If someone is magnificent, then he is strict.
It can be concluded that Mark is magnificent once knowing that Alfred is not blushing or Mark is not strict.
As long as someone is either not critical or strict, he is unpleasant and skinny.
Mark being critical implies that Harmony is not skinny.
If Hope is magnificent and Alfred is not unpleasant, then Hanna is not critical.
Grant is strict if and only if Brent is not blushing.
Someone who is both skinny and critical is always not blushing.
If all people are blushing, then Harmony is not unpleasant and Hope is strict. | Alfred is not unpleasant. | neutral |
Alfred is critical.
Hanna is strict.
Hanna is skinny.
Mark is skinny.
Harmony is not skinny.
Alfred is skinny.
Brent is strict.
Hope is skinny.
Brent is unpleasant.
Mark is not blushing.
Hanna is magnificent.
Grant is not skinny.If Grant is not magnificent or Brent is critical, then Hanna is blushing.
Someone who is eithor not blushing or unpleasant is always not magnificent.
If there is at least one people who is magnificent, then Hope is not strict and Alfred is not skinny.
If there is at least one people who is not unpleasant, then Mark is magnificent.
If someone is magnificent, then he is strict.
It can be concluded that Mark is magnificent once knowing that Alfred is not blushing or Mark is not strict.
As long as someone is either not critical or strict, he is unpleasant and skinny.
Mark being critical implies that Harmony is not skinny.
If Hope is magnificent and Alfred is not unpleasant, then Hanna is not critical.
Grant is strict if and only if Brent is not blushing.
Someone who is both skinny and critical is always not blushing.
If all people are blushing, then Harmony is not unpleasant and Hope is strict. | Mark is skinny. | entailment |
Alfred is critical.
Hanna is strict.
Hanna is skinny.
Mark is skinny.
Harmony is not skinny.
Alfred is skinny.
Brent is strict.
Hope is skinny.
Brent is unpleasant.
Mark is not blushing.
Hanna is magnificent.
Grant is not skinny.If Grant is not magnificent or Brent is critical, then Hanna is blushing.
Someone who is eithor not blushing or unpleasant is always not magnificent.
If there is at least one people who is magnificent, then Hope is not strict and Alfred is not skinny.
If there is at least one people who is not unpleasant, then Mark is magnificent.
If someone is magnificent, then he is strict.
It can be concluded that Mark is magnificent once knowing that Alfred is not blushing or Mark is not strict.
As long as someone is either not critical or strict, he is unpleasant and skinny.
Mark being critical implies that Harmony is not skinny.
If Hope is magnificent and Alfred is not unpleasant, then Hanna is not critical.
Grant is strict if and only if Brent is not blushing.
Someone who is both skinny and critical is always not blushing.
If all people are blushing, then Harmony is not unpleasant and Hope is strict. | Alfred is magnificent. | contradiction |
Alfred is critical.
Hanna is strict.
Hanna is skinny.
Mark is skinny.
Harmony is not skinny.
Alfred is skinny.
Brent is strict.
Hope is skinny.
Brent is unpleasant.
Mark is not blushing.
Hanna is magnificent.
Grant is not skinny.If Grant is not magnificent or Brent is critical, then Hanna is blushing.
Someone who is eithor not blushing or unpleasant is always not magnificent.
If there is at least one people who is magnificent, then Hope is not strict and Alfred is not skinny.
If there is at least one people who is not unpleasant, then Mark is magnificent.
If someone is magnificent, then he is strict.
It can be concluded that Mark is magnificent once knowing that Alfred is not blushing or Mark is not strict.
As long as someone is either not critical or strict, he is unpleasant and skinny.
Mark being critical implies that Harmony is not skinny.
If Hope is magnificent and Alfred is not unpleasant, then Hanna is not critical.
Grant is strict if and only if Brent is not blushing.
Someone who is both skinny and critical is always not blushing.
If all people are blushing, then Harmony is not unpleasant and Hope is strict. | Mark is blushing. | contradiction |
Alfred is critical.
Hanna is strict.
Hanna is skinny.
Mark is skinny.
Harmony is not skinny.
Alfred is skinny.
Brent is strict.
Hope is skinny.
Brent is unpleasant.
Mark is not blushing.
Hanna is magnificent.
Grant is not skinny.If Grant is not magnificent or Brent is critical, then Hanna is blushing.
Someone who is eithor not blushing or unpleasant is always not magnificent.
If there is at least one people who is magnificent, then Hope is not strict and Alfred is not skinny.
If there is at least one people who is not unpleasant, then Mark is magnificent.
If someone is magnificent, then he is strict.
It can be concluded that Mark is magnificent once knowing that Alfred is not blushing or Mark is not strict.
As long as someone is either not critical or strict, he is unpleasant and skinny.
Mark being critical implies that Harmony is not skinny.
If Hope is magnificent and Alfred is not unpleasant, then Hanna is not critical.
Grant is strict if and only if Brent is not blushing.
Someone who is both skinny and critical is always not blushing.
If all people are blushing, then Harmony is not unpleasant and Hope is strict. | Mark is not unpleasant. | contradiction |
Alfred is critical.
Hanna is strict.
Hanna is skinny.
Mark is skinny.
Harmony is not skinny.
Alfred is skinny.
Brent is strict.
Hope is skinny.
Brent is unpleasant.
Mark is not blushing.
Hanna is magnificent.
Grant is not skinny.If Grant is not magnificent or Brent is critical, then Hanna is blushing.
Someone who is eithor not blushing or unpleasant is always not magnificent.
If there is at least one people who is magnificent, then Hope is not strict and Alfred is not skinny.
If there is at least one people who is not unpleasant, then Mark is magnificent.
If someone is magnificent, then he is strict.
It can be concluded that Mark is magnificent once knowing that Alfred is not blushing or Mark is not strict.
As long as someone is either not critical or strict, he is unpleasant and skinny.
Mark being critical implies that Harmony is not skinny.
If Hope is magnificent and Alfred is not unpleasant, then Hanna is not critical.
Grant is strict if and only if Brent is not blushing.
Someone who is both skinny and critical is always not blushing.
If all people are blushing, then Harmony is not unpleasant and Hope is strict. | Harmony is strict. | neutral |
Alfred is critical.
Hanna is strict.
Hanna is skinny.
Mark is skinny.
Harmony is not skinny.
Alfred is skinny.
Brent is strict.
Hope is skinny.
Brent is unpleasant.
Mark is not blushing.
Hanna is magnificent.
Grant is not skinny.If Grant is not magnificent or Brent is critical, then Hanna is blushing.
Someone who is eithor not blushing or unpleasant is always not magnificent.
If there is at least one people who is magnificent, then Hope is not strict and Alfred is not skinny.
If there is at least one people who is not unpleasant, then Mark is magnificent.
If someone is magnificent, then he is strict.
It can be concluded that Mark is magnificent once knowing that Alfred is not blushing or Mark is not strict.
As long as someone is either not critical or strict, he is unpleasant and skinny.
Mark being critical implies that Harmony is not skinny.
If Hope is magnificent and Alfred is not unpleasant, then Hanna is not critical.
Grant is strict if and only if Brent is not blushing.
Someone who is both skinny and critical is always not blushing.
If all people are blushing, then Harmony is not unpleasant and Hope is strict. | Harmony is not blushing. | neutral |
Alfred is critical.
Hanna is strict.
Hanna is skinny.
Mark is skinny.
Harmony is not skinny.
Alfred is skinny.
Brent is strict.
Hope is skinny.
Brent is unpleasant.
Mark is not blushing.
Hanna is magnificent.
Grant is not skinny.If Grant is not magnificent or Brent is critical, then Hanna is blushing.
Someone who is eithor not blushing or unpleasant is always not magnificent.
If there is at least one people who is magnificent, then Hope is not strict and Alfred is not skinny.
If there is at least one people who is not unpleasant, then Mark is magnificent.
If someone is magnificent, then he is strict.
It can be concluded that Mark is magnificent once knowing that Alfred is not blushing or Mark is not strict.
As long as someone is either not critical or strict, he is unpleasant and skinny.
Mark being critical implies that Harmony is not skinny.
If Hope is magnificent and Alfred is not unpleasant, then Hanna is not critical.
Grant is strict if and only if Brent is not blushing.
Someone who is both skinny and critical is always not blushing.
If all people are blushing, then Harmony is not unpleasant and Hope is strict. | Alfred is not skinny. | self_contradiction |
Alfred is critical.
Hanna is strict.
Hanna is skinny.
Mark is skinny.
Harmony is not skinny.
Alfred is skinny.
Brent is strict.
Hope is skinny.
Brent is unpleasant.
Mark is not blushing.
Hanna is magnificent.
Grant is not skinny.If Grant is not magnificent or Brent is critical, then Hanna is blushing.
Someone who is eithor not blushing or unpleasant is always not magnificent.
If there is at least one people who is magnificent, then Hope is not strict and Alfred is not skinny.
If there is at least one people who is not unpleasant, then Mark is magnificent.
If someone is magnificent, then he is strict.
It can be concluded that Mark is magnificent once knowing that Alfred is not blushing or Mark is not strict.
As long as someone is either not critical or strict, he is unpleasant and skinny.
Mark being critical implies that Harmony is not skinny.
If Hope is magnificent and Alfred is not unpleasant, then Hanna is not critical.
Grant is strict if and only if Brent is not blushing.
Someone who is both skinny and critical is always not blushing.
If all people are blushing, then Harmony is not unpleasant and Hope is strict. | Alfred is strict. | neutral |
Alfred is critical.
Hanna is strict.
Hanna is skinny.
Mark is skinny.
Harmony is not skinny.
Alfred is skinny.
Brent is strict.
Hope is skinny.
Brent is unpleasant.
Mark is not blushing.
Hanna is magnificent.
Grant is not skinny.If Grant is not magnificent or Brent is critical, then Hanna is blushing.
Someone who is eithor not blushing or unpleasant is always not magnificent.
If there is at least one people who is magnificent, then Hope is not strict and Alfred is not skinny.
If there is at least one people who is not unpleasant, then Mark is magnificent.
If someone is magnificent, then he is strict.
It can be concluded that Mark is magnificent once knowing that Alfred is not blushing or Mark is not strict.
As long as someone is either not critical or strict, he is unpleasant and skinny.
Mark being critical implies that Harmony is not skinny.
If Hope is magnificent and Alfred is not unpleasant, then Hanna is not critical.
Grant is strict if and only if Brent is not blushing.
Someone who is both skinny and critical is always not blushing.
If all people are blushing, then Harmony is not unpleasant and Hope is strict. | Mark is not magnificent. | self_contradiction |
Alfred is critical.
Hanna is strict.
Hanna is skinny.
Mark is skinny.
Harmony is not skinny.
Alfred is skinny.
Brent is strict.
Hope is skinny.
Brent is unpleasant.
Mark is not blushing.
Hanna is magnificent.
Grant is not skinny.If Grant is not magnificent or Brent is critical, then Hanna is blushing.
Someone who is eithor not blushing or unpleasant is always not magnificent.
If there is at least one people who is magnificent, then Hope is not strict and Alfred is not skinny.
If there is at least one people who is not unpleasant, then Mark is magnificent.
If someone is magnificent, then he is strict.
It can be concluded that Mark is magnificent once knowing that Alfred is not blushing or Mark is not strict.
As long as someone is either not critical or strict, he is unpleasant and skinny.
Mark being critical implies that Harmony is not skinny.
If Hope is magnificent and Alfred is not unpleasant, then Hanna is not critical.
Grant is strict if and only if Brent is not blushing.
Someone who is both skinny and critical is always not blushing.
If all people are blushing, then Harmony is not unpleasant and Hope is strict. | Hanna is magnificent. | self_contradiction |
Alfred is critical.
Hanna is strict.
Hanna is skinny.
Mark is skinny.
Harmony is not skinny.
Alfred is skinny.
Brent is strict.
Hope is skinny.
Brent is unpleasant.
Mark is not blushing.
Hanna is magnificent.
Grant is not skinny.If Grant is not magnificent or Brent is critical, then Hanna is blushing.
Someone who is eithor not blushing or unpleasant is always not magnificent.
If there is at least one people who is magnificent, then Hope is not strict and Alfred is not skinny.
If there is at least one people who is not unpleasant, then Mark is magnificent.
If someone is magnificent, then he is strict.
It can be concluded that Mark is magnificent once knowing that Alfred is not blushing or Mark is not strict.
As long as someone is either not critical or strict, he is unpleasant and skinny.
Mark being critical implies that Harmony is not skinny.
If Hope is magnificent and Alfred is not unpleasant, then Hanna is not critical.
Grant is strict if and only if Brent is not blushing.
Someone who is both skinny and critical is always not blushing.
If all people are blushing, then Harmony is not unpleasant and Hope is strict. | Alfred is not magnificent. | entailment |
Kianna is foolish.
Sherman is not existing.
Jeremiah is foolish.
Sherman is foolish.
Jeremiah is not frightened.
Sherman is messy.
Herbert is not gifted.
Albert is frightened.
Kianna is messy.
Leith is not existing.
Herbert is existing.
Leith is not messy.If Kianna is foolish, then Herbert is not gifted and Jeremiah is not existing.
Someone who is not existing is always both messy and not foolish.
It can be concluded that Albert is foolish and Herbert is humble once knowing that Kianna is messy.
If Sherman is existing, then Sherman is not messy and Leith is frightened, and vice versa.
Albert being messy implies that Herbert is foolish.
If there is at least one people who is both existing and not messy, then Jeremiah is frightened.
If there is someone who is either messy or not foolish, then Gideon is not humble.
As long as someone is frightened, he is messy and not foolish.
If Jeremiah is messy, then Kianna is foolish, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not foolish and not frightened, then Sherman is messy.
Sherman is existing if and only if Jeremiah is not foolish and Gideon is gifted.
If someone is foolish and not humble, then he is both not existing and gifted, and vice versa. | Gideon is existing. | neutral |
Kianna is foolish.
Sherman is not existing.
Jeremiah is foolish.
Sherman is foolish.
Jeremiah is not frightened.
Sherman is messy.
Herbert is not gifted.
Albert is frightened.
Kianna is messy.
Leith is not existing.
Herbert is existing.
Leith is not messy.If Kianna is foolish, then Herbert is not gifted and Jeremiah is not existing.
Someone who is not existing is always both messy and not foolish.
It can be concluded that Albert is foolish and Herbert is humble once knowing that Kianna is messy.
If Sherman is existing, then Sherman is not messy and Leith is frightened, and vice versa.
Albert being messy implies that Herbert is foolish.
If there is at least one people who is both existing and not messy, then Jeremiah is frightened.
If there is someone who is either messy or not foolish, then Gideon is not humble.
As long as someone is frightened, he is messy and not foolish.
If Jeremiah is messy, then Kianna is foolish, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not foolish and not frightened, then Sherman is messy.
Sherman is existing if and only if Jeremiah is not foolish and Gideon is gifted.
If someone is foolish and not humble, then he is both not existing and gifted, and vice versa. | Leith is messy. | self_contradiction |
Kianna is foolish.
Sherman is not existing.
Jeremiah is foolish.
Sherman is foolish.
Jeremiah is not frightened.
Sherman is messy.
Herbert is not gifted.
Albert is frightened.
Kianna is messy.
Leith is not existing.
Herbert is existing.
Leith is not messy.If Kianna is foolish, then Herbert is not gifted and Jeremiah is not existing.
Someone who is not existing is always both messy and not foolish.
It can be concluded that Albert is foolish and Herbert is humble once knowing that Kianna is messy.
If Sherman is existing, then Sherman is not messy and Leith is frightened, and vice versa.
Albert being messy implies that Herbert is foolish.
If there is at least one people who is both existing and not messy, then Jeremiah is frightened.
If there is someone who is either messy or not foolish, then Gideon is not humble.
As long as someone is frightened, he is messy and not foolish.
If Jeremiah is messy, then Kianna is foolish, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not foolish and not frightened, then Sherman is messy.
Sherman is existing if and only if Jeremiah is not foolish and Gideon is gifted.
If someone is foolish and not humble, then he is both not existing and gifted, and vice versa. | Albert is not foolish. | self_contradiction |
Kianna is foolish.
Sherman is not existing.
Jeremiah is foolish.
Sherman is foolish.
Jeremiah is not frightened.
Sherman is messy.
Herbert is not gifted.
Albert is frightened.
Kianna is messy.
Leith is not existing.
Herbert is existing.
Leith is not messy.If Kianna is foolish, then Herbert is not gifted and Jeremiah is not existing.
Someone who is not existing is always both messy and not foolish.
It can be concluded that Albert is foolish and Herbert is humble once knowing that Kianna is messy.
If Sherman is existing, then Sherman is not messy and Leith is frightened, and vice versa.
Albert being messy implies that Herbert is foolish.
If there is at least one people who is both existing and not messy, then Jeremiah is frightened.
If there is someone who is either messy or not foolish, then Gideon is not humble.
As long as someone is frightened, he is messy and not foolish.
If Jeremiah is messy, then Kianna is foolish, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not foolish and not frightened, then Sherman is messy.
Sherman is existing if and only if Jeremiah is not foolish and Gideon is gifted.
If someone is foolish and not humble, then he is both not existing and gifted, and vice versa. | Herbert is not gifted. | entailment |
Kianna is foolish.
Sherman is not existing.
Jeremiah is foolish.
Sherman is foolish.
Jeremiah is not frightened.
Sherman is messy.
Herbert is not gifted.
Albert is frightened.
Kianna is messy.
Leith is not existing.
Herbert is existing.
Leith is not messy.If Kianna is foolish, then Herbert is not gifted and Jeremiah is not existing.
Someone who is not existing is always both messy and not foolish.
It can be concluded that Albert is foolish and Herbert is humble once knowing that Kianna is messy.
If Sherman is existing, then Sherman is not messy and Leith is frightened, and vice versa.
Albert being messy implies that Herbert is foolish.
If there is at least one people who is both existing and not messy, then Jeremiah is frightened.
If there is someone who is either messy or not foolish, then Gideon is not humble.
As long as someone is frightened, he is messy and not foolish.
If Jeremiah is messy, then Kianna is foolish, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not foolish and not frightened, then Sherman is messy.
Sherman is existing if and only if Jeremiah is not foolish and Gideon is gifted.
If someone is foolish and not humble, then he is both not existing and gifted, and vice versa. | Jeremiah is messy. | entailment |
Kianna is foolish.
Sherman is not existing.
Jeremiah is foolish.
Sherman is foolish.
Jeremiah is not frightened.
Sherman is messy.
Herbert is not gifted.
Albert is frightened.
Kianna is messy.
Leith is not existing.
Herbert is existing.
Leith is not messy.If Kianna is foolish, then Herbert is not gifted and Jeremiah is not existing.
Someone who is not existing is always both messy and not foolish.
It can be concluded that Albert is foolish and Herbert is humble once knowing that Kianna is messy.
If Sherman is existing, then Sherman is not messy and Leith is frightened, and vice versa.
Albert being messy implies that Herbert is foolish.
If there is at least one people who is both existing and not messy, then Jeremiah is frightened.
If there is someone who is either messy or not foolish, then Gideon is not humble.
As long as someone is frightened, he is messy and not foolish.
If Jeremiah is messy, then Kianna is foolish, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not foolish and not frightened, then Sherman is messy.
Sherman is existing if and only if Jeremiah is not foolish and Gideon is gifted.
If someone is foolish and not humble, then he is both not existing and gifted, and vice versa. | Albert is gifted. | neutral |
Kianna is foolish.
Sherman is not existing.
Jeremiah is foolish.
Sherman is foolish.
Jeremiah is not frightened.
Sherman is messy.
Herbert is not gifted.
Albert is frightened.
Kianna is messy.
Leith is not existing.
Herbert is existing.
Leith is not messy.If Kianna is foolish, then Herbert is not gifted and Jeremiah is not existing.
Someone who is not existing is always both messy and not foolish.
It can be concluded that Albert is foolish and Herbert is humble once knowing that Kianna is messy.
If Sherman is existing, then Sherman is not messy and Leith is frightened, and vice versa.
Albert being messy implies that Herbert is foolish.
If there is at least one people who is both existing and not messy, then Jeremiah is frightened.
If there is someone who is either messy or not foolish, then Gideon is not humble.
As long as someone is frightened, he is messy and not foolish.
If Jeremiah is messy, then Kianna is foolish, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not foolish and not frightened, then Sherman is messy.
Sherman is existing if and only if Jeremiah is not foolish and Gideon is gifted.
If someone is foolish and not humble, then he is both not existing and gifted, and vice versa. | Kianna is not messy. | contradiction |
Kianna is foolish.
Sherman is not existing.
Jeremiah is foolish.
Sherman is foolish.
Jeremiah is not frightened.
Sherman is messy.
Herbert is not gifted.
Albert is frightened.
Kianna is messy.
Leith is not existing.
Herbert is existing.
Leith is not messy.If Kianna is foolish, then Herbert is not gifted and Jeremiah is not existing.
Someone who is not existing is always both messy and not foolish.
It can be concluded that Albert is foolish and Herbert is humble once knowing that Kianna is messy.
If Sherman is existing, then Sherman is not messy and Leith is frightened, and vice versa.
Albert being messy implies that Herbert is foolish.
If there is at least one people who is both existing and not messy, then Jeremiah is frightened.
If there is someone who is either messy or not foolish, then Gideon is not humble.
As long as someone is frightened, he is messy and not foolish.
If Jeremiah is messy, then Kianna is foolish, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not foolish and not frightened, then Sherman is messy.
Sherman is existing if and only if Jeremiah is not foolish and Gideon is gifted.
If someone is foolish and not humble, then he is both not existing and gifted, and vice versa. | Albert is not messy. | contradiction |
Kianna is foolish.
Sherman is not existing.
Jeremiah is foolish.
Sherman is foolish.
Jeremiah is not frightened.
Sherman is messy.
Herbert is not gifted.
Albert is frightened.
Kianna is messy.
Leith is not existing.
Herbert is existing.
Leith is not messy.If Kianna is foolish, then Herbert is not gifted and Jeremiah is not existing.
Someone who is not existing is always both messy and not foolish.
It can be concluded that Albert is foolish and Herbert is humble once knowing that Kianna is messy.
If Sherman is existing, then Sherman is not messy and Leith is frightened, and vice versa.
Albert being messy implies that Herbert is foolish.
If there is at least one people who is both existing and not messy, then Jeremiah is frightened.
If there is someone who is either messy or not foolish, then Gideon is not humble.
As long as someone is frightened, he is messy and not foolish.
If Jeremiah is messy, then Kianna is foolish, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not foolish and not frightened, then Sherman is messy.
Sherman is existing if and only if Jeremiah is not foolish and Gideon is gifted.
If someone is foolish and not humble, then he is both not existing and gifted, and vice versa. | Jeremiah is not gifted. | neutral |
Kianna is foolish.
Sherman is not existing.
Jeremiah is foolish.
Sherman is foolish.
Jeremiah is not frightened.
Sherman is messy.
Herbert is not gifted.
Albert is frightened.
Kianna is messy.
Leith is not existing.
Herbert is existing.
Leith is not messy.If Kianna is foolish, then Herbert is not gifted and Jeremiah is not existing.
Someone who is not existing is always both messy and not foolish.
It can be concluded that Albert is foolish and Herbert is humble once knowing that Kianna is messy.
If Sherman is existing, then Sherman is not messy and Leith is frightened, and vice versa.
Albert being messy implies that Herbert is foolish.
If there is at least one people who is both existing and not messy, then Jeremiah is frightened.
If there is someone who is either messy or not foolish, then Gideon is not humble.
As long as someone is frightened, he is messy and not foolish.
If Jeremiah is messy, then Kianna is foolish, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not foolish and not frightened, then Sherman is messy.
Sherman is existing if and only if Jeremiah is not foolish and Gideon is gifted.
If someone is foolish and not humble, then he is both not existing and gifted, and vice versa. | Albert is foolish. | self_contradiction |
Kianna is foolish.
Sherman is not existing.
Jeremiah is foolish.
Sherman is foolish.
Jeremiah is not frightened.
Sherman is messy.
Herbert is not gifted.
Albert is frightened.
Kianna is messy.
Leith is not existing.
Herbert is existing.
Leith is not messy.If Kianna is foolish, then Herbert is not gifted and Jeremiah is not existing.
Someone who is not existing is always both messy and not foolish.
It can be concluded that Albert is foolish and Herbert is humble once knowing that Kianna is messy.
If Sherman is existing, then Sherman is not messy and Leith is frightened, and vice versa.
Albert being messy implies that Herbert is foolish.
If there is at least one people who is both existing and not messy, then Jeremiah is frightened.
If there is someone who is either messy or not foolish, then Gideon is not humble.
As long as someone is frightened, he is messy and not foolish.
If Jeremiah is messy, then Kianna is foolish, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not foolish and not frightened, then Sherman is messy.
Sherman is existing if and only if Jeremiah is not foolish and Gideon is gifted.
If someone is foolish and not humble, then he is both not existing and gifted, and vice versa. | Albert is not existing. | neutral |
Kianna is foolish.
Sherman is not existing.
Jeremiah is foolish.
Sherman is foolish.
Jeremiah is not frightened.
Sherman is messy.
Herbert is not gifted.
Albert is frightened.
Kianna is messy.
Leith is not existing.
Herbert is existing.
Leith is not messy.If Kianna is foolish, then Herbert is not gifted and Jeremiah is not existing.
Someone who is not existing is always both messy and not foolish.
It can be concluded that Albert is foolish and Herbert is humble once knowing that Kianna is messy.
If Sherman is existing, then Sherman is not messy and Leith is frightened, and vice versa.
Albert being messy implies that Herbert is foolish.
If there is at least one people who is both existing and not messy, then Jeremiah is frightened.
If there is someone who is either messy or not foolish, then Gideon is not humble.
As long as someone is frightened, he is messy and not foolish.
If Jeremiah is messy, then Kianna is foolish, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not foolish and not frightened, then Sherman is messy.
Sherman is existing if and only if Jeremiah is not foolish and Gideon is gifted.
If someone is foolish and not humble, then he is both not existing and gifted, and vice versa. | Kianna is not foolish. | contradiction |
Kianna is foolish.
Sherman is not existing.
Jeremiah is foolish.
Sherman is foolish.
Jeremiah is not frightened.
Sherman is messy.
Herbert is not gifted.
Albert is frightened.
Kianna is messy.
Leith is not existing.
Herbert is existing.
Leith is not messy.If Kianna is foolish, then Herbert is not gifted and Jeremiah is not existing.
Someone who is not existing is always both messy and not foolish.
It can be concluded that Albert is foolish and Herbert is humble once knowing that Kianna is messy.
If Sherman is existing, then Sherman is not messy and Leith is frightened, and vice versa.
Albert being messy implies that Herbert is foolish.
If there is at least one people who is both existing and not messy, then Jeremiah is frightened.
If there is someone who is either messy or not foolish, then Gideon is not humble.
As long as someone is frightened, he is messy and not foolish.
If Jeremiah is messy, then Kianna is foolish, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not foolish and not frightened, then Sherman is messy.
Sherman is existing if and only if Jeremiah is not foolish and Gideon is gifted.
If someone is foolish and not humble, then he is both not existing and gifted, and vice versa. | Jeremiah is not foolish. | self_contradiction |
Kianna is foolish.
Sherman is not existing.
Jeremiah is foolish.
Sherman is foolish.
Jeremiah is not frightened.
Sherman is messy.
Herbert is not gifted.
Albert is frightened.
Kianna is messy.
Leith is not existing.
Herbert is existing.
Leith is not messy.If Kianna is foolish, then Herbert is not gifted and Jeremiah is not existing.
Someone who is not existing is always both messy and not foolish.
It can be concluded that Albert is foolish and Herbert is humble once knowing that Kianna is messy.
If Sherman is existing, then Sherman is not messy and Leith is frightened, and vice versa.
Albert being messy implies that Herbert is foolish.
If there is at least one people who is both existing and not messy, then Jeremiah is frightened.
If there is someone who is either messy or not foolish, then Gideon is not humble.
As long as someone is frightened, he is messy and not foolish.
If Jeremiah is messy, then Kianna is foolish, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not foolish and not frightened, then Sherman is messy.
Sherman is existing if and only if Jeremiah is not foolish and Gideon is gifted.
If someone is foolish and not humble, then he is both not existing and gifted, and vice versa. | Jeremiah is not existing. | entailment |
Kianna is foolish.
Sherman is not existing.
Jeremiah is foolish.
Sherman is foolish.
Jeremiah is not frightened.
Sherman is messy.
Herbert is not gifted.
Albert is frightened.
Kianna is messy.
Leith is not existing.
Herbert is existing.
Leith is not messy.If Kianna is foolish, then Herbert is not gifted and Jeremiah is not existing.
Someone who is not existing is always both messy and not foolish.
It can be concluded that Albert is foolish and Herbert is humble once knowing that Kianna is messy.
If Sherman is existing, then Sherman is not messy and Leith is frightened, and vice versa.
Albert being messy implies that Herbert is foolish.
If there is at least one people who is both existing and not messy, then Jeremiah is frightened.
If there is someone who is either messy or not foolish, then Gideon is not humble.
As long as someone is frightened, he is messy and not foolish.
If Jeremiah is messy, then Kianna is foolish, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not foolish and not frightened, then Sherman is messy.
Sherman is existing if and only if Jeremiah is not foolish and Gideon is gifted.
If someone is foolish and not humble, then he is both not existing and gifted, and vice versa. | Sherman is not foolish. | self_contradiction |
Kianna is foolish.
Sherman is not existing.
Jeremiah is foolish.
Sherman is foolish.
Jeremiah is not frightened.
Sherman is messy.
Herbert is not gifted.
Albert is frightened.
Kianna is messy.
Leith is not existing.
Herbert is existing.
Leith is not messy.If Kianna is foolish, then Herbert is not gifted and Jeremiah is not existing.
Someone who is not existing is always both messy and not foolish.
It can be concluded that Albert is foolish and Herbert is humble once knowing that Kianna is messy.
If Sherman is existing, then Sherman is not messy and Leith is frightened, and vice versa.
Albert being messy implies that Herbert is foolish.
If there is at least one people who is both existing and not messy, then Jeremiah is frightened.
If there is someone who is either messy or not foolish, then Gideon is not humble.
As long as someone is frightened, he is messy and not foolish.
If Jeremiah is messy, then Kianna is foolish, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not foolish and not frightened, then Sherman is messy.
Sherman is existing if and only if Jeremiah is not foolish and Gideon is gifted.
If someone is foolish and not humble, then he is both not existing and gifted, and vice versa. | Herbert is gifted. | contradiction |
Kianna is foolish.
Sherman is not existing.
Jeremiah is foolish.
Sherman is foolish.
Jeremiah is not frightened.
Sherman is messy.
Herbert is not gifted.
Albert is frightened.
Kianna is messy.
Leith is not existing.
Herbert is existing.
Leith is not messy.If Kianna is foolish, then Herbert is not gifted and Jeremiah is not existing.
Someone who is not existing is always both messy and not foolish.
It can be concluded that Albert is foolish and Herbert is humble once knowing that Kianna is messy.
If Sherman is existing, then Sherman is not messy and Leith is frightened, and vice versa.
Albert being messy implies that Herbert is foolish.
If there is at least one people who is both existing and not messy, then Jeremiah is frightened.
If there is someone who is either messy or not foolish, then Gideon is not humble.
As long as someone is frightened, he is messy and not foolish.
If Jeremiah is messy, then Kianna is foolish, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not foolish and not frightened, then Sherman is messy.
Sherman is existing if and only if Jeremiah is not foolish and Gideon is gifted.
If someone is foolish and not humble, then he is both not existing and gifted, and vice versa. | Herbert is not foolish. | contradiction |
Kianna is foolish.
Sherman is not existing.
Jeremiah is foolish.
Sherman is foolish.
Jeremiah is not frightened.
Sherman is messy.
Herbert is not gifted.
Albert is frightened.
Kianna is messy.
Leith is not existing.
Herbert is existing.
Leith is not messy.If Kianna is foolish, then Herbert is not gifted and Jeremiah is not existing.
Someone who is not existing is always both messy and not foolish.
It can be concluded that Albert is foolish and Herbert is humble once knowing that Kianna is messy.
If Sherman is existing, then Sherman is not messy and Leith is frightened, and vice versa.
Albert being messy implies that Herbert is foolish.
If there is at least one people who is both existing and not messy, then Jeremiah is frightened.
If there is someone who is either messy or not foolish, then Gideon is not humble.
As long as someone is frightened, he is messy and not foolish.
If Jeremiah is messy, then Kianna is foolish, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not foolish and not frightened, then Sherman is messy.
Sherman is existing if and only if Jeremiah is not foolish and Gideon is gifted.
If someone is foolish and not humble, then he is both not existing and gifted, and vice versa. | Herbert is humble. | entailment |
Kianna is foolish.
Sherman is not existing.
Jeremiah is foolish.
Sherman is foolish.
Jeremiah is not frightened.
Sherman is messy.
Herbert is not gifted.
Albert is frightened.
Kianna is messy.
Leith is not existing.
Herbert is existing.
Leith is not messy.If Kianna is foolish, then Herbert is not gifted and Jeremiah is not existing.
Someone who is not existing is always both messy and not foolish.
It can be concluded that Albert is foolish and Herbert is humble once knowing that Kianna is messy.
If Sherman is existing, then Sherman is not messy and Leith is frightened, and vice versa.
Albert being messy implies that Herbert is foolish.
If there is at least one people who is both existing and not messy, then Jeremiah is frightened.
If there is someone who is either messy or not foolish, then Gideon is not humble.
As long as someone is frightened, he is messy and not foolish.
If Jeremiah is messy, then Kianna is foolish, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not foolish and not frightened, then Sherman is messy.
Sherman is existing if and only if Jeremiah is not foolish and Gideon is gifted.
If someone is foolish and not humble, then he is both not existing and gifted, and vice versa. | Sherman is not existing. | entailment |
Kianna is foolish.
Sherman is not existing.
Jeremiah is foolish.
Sherman is foolish.
Jeremiah is not frightened.
Sherman is messy.
Herbert is not gifted.
Albert is frightened.
Kianna is messy.
Leith is not existing.
Herbert is existing.
Leith is not messy.If Kianna is foolish, then Herbert is not gifted and Jeremiah is not existing.
Someone who is not existing is always both messy and not foolish.
It can be concluded that Albert is foolish and Herbert is humble once knowing that Kianna is messy.
If Sherman is existing, then Sherman is not messy and Leith is frightened, and vice versa.
Albert being messy implies that Herbert is foolish.
If there is at least one people who is both existing and not messy, then Jeremiah is frightened.
If there is someone who is either messy or not foolish, then Gideon is not humble.
As long as someone is frightened, he is messy and not foolish.
If Jeremiah is messy, then Kianna is foolish, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not foolish and not frightened, then Sherman is messy.
Sherman is existing if and only if Jeremiah is not foolish and Gideon is gifted.
If someone is foolish and not humble, then he is both not existing and gifted, and vice versa. | Kianna is humble. | neutral |
Andrew is attentive.
Andrew is naughty.
Isabel is not small.
Claudia is careful.
Maggie is not bloody.
Claude is not small.
Claudia is small.
Claudia is bloody.
Claude is not careful.
Maggie is attentive.
Andrew is bloody.
Andrew is small.If Clark is not small or Sandy is bloody, then Sandy is not naughty.
If someone is naughty, then he is not small.
If there is someone who is either small or bloody, then Claudia is attentive.
It can be concluded that Andrew is naughty once knowing that Maggie is obedient.
Someone who is eithor careful or attentive is always not naughty.
Sandy being careful and Claudia being not naughty imply that Sandy is small.
Claude is careful if and only if Claude is not obedient.
Someone who is both bloody and not naughty is always obedient.
If someone is both not naughty and small, then he is obedient.
Someone being not naughty is equivalent to being bloody.
If there is at least one people who is not attentive, then Andrew is obedient and Andrew is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is obedient, then Andrew is bloody. | Andrew is not obedient. | contradiction |
Andrew is attentive.
Andrew is naughty.
Isabel is not small.
Claudia is careful.
Maggie is not bloody.
Claude is not small.
Claudia is small.
Claudia is bloody.
Claude is not careful.
Maggie is attentive.
Andrew is bloody.
Andrew is small.If Clark is not small or Sandy is bloody, then Sandy is not naughty.
If someone is naughty, then he is not small.
If there is someone who is either small or bloody, then Claudia is attentive.
It can be concluded that Andrew is naughty once knowing that Maggie is obedient.
Someone who is eithor careful or attentive is always not naughty.
Sandy being careful and Claudia being not naughty imply that Sandy is small.
Claude is careful if and only if Claude is not obedient.
Someone who is both bloody and not naughty is always obedient.
If someone is both not naughty and small, then he is obedient.
Someone being not naughty is equivalent to being bloody.
If there is at least one people who is not attentive, then Andrew is obedient and Andrew is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is obedient, then Andrew is bloody. | Claudia is not small. | contradiction |
Andrew is attentive.
Andrew is naughty.
Isabel is not small.
Claudia is careful.
Maggie is not bloody.
Claude is not small.
Claudia is small.
Claudia is bloody.
Claude is not careful.
Maggie is attentive.
Andrew is bloody.
Andrew is small.If Clark is not small or Sandy is bloody, then Sandy is not naughty.
If someone is naughty, then he is not small.
If there is someone who is either small or bloody, then Claudia is attentive.
It can be concluded that Andrew is naughty once knowing that Maggie is obedient.
Someone who is eithor careful or attentive is always not naughty.
Sandy being careful and Claudia being not naughty imply that Sandy is small.
Claude is careful if and only if Claude is not obedient.
Someone who is both bloody and not naughty is always obedient.
If someone is both not naughty and small, then he is obedient.
Someone being not naughty is equivalent to being bloody.
If there is at least one people who is not attentive, then Andrew is obedient and Andrew is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is obedient, then Andrew is bloody. | Claudia is not careful. | contradiction |
Andrew is attentive.
Andrew is naughty.
Isabel is not small.
Claudia is careful.
Maggie is not bloody.
Claude is not small.
Claudia is small.
Claudia is bloody.
Claude is not careful.
Maggie is attentive.
Andrew is bloody.
Andrew is small.If Clark is not small or Sandy is bloody, then Sandy is not naughty.
If someone is naughty, then he is not small.
If there is someone who is either small or bloody, then Claudia is attentive.
It can be concluded that Andrew is naughty once knowing that Maggie is obedient.
Someone who is eithor careful or attentive is always not naughty.
Sandy being careful and Claudia being not naughty imply that Sandy is small.
Claude is careful if and only if Claude is not obedient.
Someone who is both bloody and not naughty is always obedient.
If someone is both not naughty and small, then he is obedient.
Someone being not naughty is equivalent to being bloody.
If there is at least one people who is not attentive, then Andrew is obedient and Andrew is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is obedient, then Andrew is bloody. | Claudia is bloody. | entailment |
Andrew is attentive.
Andrew is naughty.
Isabel is not small.
Claudia is careful.
Maggie is not bloody.
Claude is not small.
Claudia is small.
Claudia is bloody.
Claude is not careful.
Maggie is attentive.
Andrew is bloody.
Andrew is small.If Clark is not small or Sandy is bloody, then Sandy is not naughty.
If someone is naughty, then he is not small.
If there is someone who is either small or bloody, then Claudia is attentive.
It can be concluded that Andrew is naughty once knowing that Maggie is obedient.
Someone who is eithor careful or attentive is always not naughty.
Sandy being careful and Claudia being not naughty imply that Sandy is small.
Claude is careful if and only if Claude is not obedient.
Someone who is both bloody and not naughty is always obedient.
If someone is both not naughty and small, then he is obedient.
Someone being not naughty is equivalent to being bloody.
If there is at least one people who is not attentive, then Andrew is obedient and Andrew is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is obedient, then Andrew is bloody. | Maggie is attentive. | entailment |
Andrew is attentive.
Andrew is naughty.
Isabel is not small.
Claudia is careful.
Maggie is not bloody.
Claude is not small.
Claudia is small.
Claudia is bloody.
Claude is not careful.
Maggie is attentive.
Andrew is bloody.
Andrew is small.If Clark is not small or Sandy is bloody, then Sandy is not naughty.
If someone is naughty, then he is not small.
If there is someone who is either small or bloody, then Claudia is attentive.
It can be concluded that Andrew is naughty once knowing that Maggie is obedient.
Someone who is eithor careful or attentive is always not naughty.
Sandy being careful and Claudia being not naughty imply that Sandy is small.
Claude is careful if and only if Claude is not obedient.
Someone who is both bloody and not naughty is always obedient.
If someone is both not naughty and small, then he is obedient.
Someone being not naughty is equivalent to being bloody.
If there is at least one people who is not attentive, then Andrew is obedient and Andrew is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is obedient, then Andrew is bloody. | Andrew is not naughty. | self_contradiction |
Andrew is attentive.
Andrew is naughty.
Isabel is not small.
Claudia is careful.
Maggie is not bloody.
Claude is not small.
Claudia is small.
Claudia is bloody.
Claude is not careful.
Maggie is attentive.
Andrew is bloody.
Andrew is small.If Clark is not small or Sandy is bloody, then Sandy is not naughty.
If someone is naughty, then he is not small.
If there is someone who is either small or bloody, then Claudia is attentive.
It can be concluded that Andrew is naughty once knowing that Maggie is obedient.
Someone who is eithor careful or attentive is always not naughty.
Sandy being careful and Claudia being not naughty imply that Sandy is small.
Claude is careful if and only if Claude is not obedient.
Someone who is both bloody and not naughty is always obedient.
If someone is both not naughty and small, then he is obedient.
Someone being not naughty is equivalent to being bloody.
If there is at least one people who is not attentive, then Andrew is obedient and Andrew is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is obedient, then Andrew is bloody. | Clark is obedient. | neutral |
Andrew is attentive.
Andrew is naughty.
Isabel is not small.
Claudia is careful.
Maggie is not bloody.
Claude is not small.
Claudia is small.
Claudia is bloody.
Claude is not careful.
Maggie is attentive.
Andrew is bloody.
Andrew is small.If Clark is not small or Sandy is bloody, then Sandy is not naughty.
If someone is naughty, then he is not small.
If there is someone who is either small or bloody, then Claudia is attentive.
It can be concluded that Andrew is naughty once knowing that Maggie is obedient.
Someone who is eithor careful or attentive is always not naughty.
Sandy being careful and Claudia being not naughty imply that Sandy is small.
Claude is careful if and only if Claude is not obedient.
Someone who is both bloody and not naughty is always obedient.
If someone is both not naughty and small, then he is obedient.
Someone being not naughty is equivalent to being bloody.
If there is at least one people who is not attentive, then Andrew is obedient and Andrew is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is obedient, then Andrew is bloody. | Andrew is not careful. | neutral |
Andrew is attentive.
Andrew is naughty.
Isabel is not small.
Claudia is careful.
Maggie is not bloody.
Claude is not small.
Claudia is small.
Claudia is bloody.
Claude is not careful.
Maggie is attentive.
Andrew is bloody.
Andrew is small.If Clark is not small or Sandy is bloody, then Sandy is not naughty.
If someone is naughty, then he is not small.
If there is someone who is either small or bloody, then Claudia is attentive.
It can be concluded that Andrew is naughty once knowing that Maggie is obedient.
Someone who is eithor careful or attentive is always not naughty.
Sandy being careful and Claudia being not naughty imply that Sandy is small.
Claude is careful if and only if Claude is not obedient.
Someone who is both bloody and not naughty is always obedient.
If someone is both not naughty and small, then he is obedient.
Someone being not naughty is equivalent to being bloody.
If there is at least one people who is not attentive, then Andrew is obedient and Andrew is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is obedient, then Andrew is bloody. | Maggie is not bloody. | self_contradiction |
Andrew is attentive.
Andrew is naughty.
Isabel is not small.
Claudia is careful.
Maggie is not bloody.
Claude is not small.
Claudia is small.
Claudia is bloody.
Claude is not careful.
Maggie is attentive.
Andrew is bloody.
Andrew is small.If Clark is not small or Sandy is bloody, then Sandy is not naughty.
If someone is naughty, then he is not small.
If there is someone who is either small or bloody, then Claudia is attentive.
It can be concluded that Andrew is naughty once knowing that Maggie is obedient.
Someone who is eithor careful or attentive is always not naughty.
Sandy being careful and Claudia being not naughty imply that Sandy is small.
Claude is careful if and only if Claude is not obedient.
Someone who is both bloody and not naughty is always obedient.
If someone is both not naughty and small, then he is obedient.
Someone being not naughty is equivalent to being bloody.
If there is at least one people who is not attentive, then Andrew is obedient and Andrew is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is obedient, then Andrew is bloody. | Claude is small. | contradiction |
Andrew is attentive.
Andrew is naughty.
Isabel is not small.
Claudia is careful.
Maggie is not bloody.
Claude is not small.
Claudia is small.
Claudia is bloody.
Claude is not careful.
Maggie is attentive.
Andrew is bloody.
Andrew is small.If Clark is not small or Sandy is bloody, then Sandy is not naughty.
If someone is naughty, then he is not small.
If there is someone who is either small or bloody, then Claudia is attentive.
It can be concluded that Andrew is naughty once knowing that Maggie is obedient.
Someone who is eithor careful or attentive is always not naughty.
Sandy being careful and Claudia being not naughty imply that Sandy is small.
Claude is careful if and only if Claude is not obedient.
Someone who is both bloody and not naughty is always obedient.
If someone is both not naughty and small, then he is obedient.
Someone being not naughty is equivalent to being bloody.
If there is at least one people who is not attentive, then Andrew is obedient and Andrew is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is obedient, then Andrew is bloody. | Maggie is bloody. | self_contradiction |
Andrew is attentive.
Andrew is naughty.
Isabel is not small.
Claudia is careful.
Maggie is not bloody.
Claude is not small.
Claudia is small.
Claudia is bloody.
Claude is not careful.
Maggie is attentive.
Andrew is bloody.
Andrew is small.If Clark is not small or Sandy is bloody, then Sandy is not naughty.
If someone is naughty, then he is not small.
If there is someone who is either small or bloody, then Claudia is attentive.
It can be concluded that Andrew is naughty once knowing that Maggie is obedient.
Someone who is eithor careful or attentive is always not naughty.
Sandy being careful and Claudia being not naughty imply that Sandy is small.
Claude is careful if and only if Claude is not obedient.
Someone who is both bloody and not naughty is always obedient.
If someone is both not naughty and small, then he is obedient.
Someone being not naughty is equivalent to being bloody.
If there is at least one people who is not attentive, then Andrew is obedient and Andrew is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is obedient, then Andrew is bloody. | Isabel is bloody. | neutral |
Andrew is attentive.
Andrew is naughty.
Isabel is not small.
Claudia is careful.
Maggie is not bloody.
Claude is not small.
Claudia is small.
Claudia is bloody.
Claude is not careful.
Maggie is attentive.
Andrew is bloody.
Andrew is small.If Clark is not small or Sandy is bloody, then Sandy is not naughty.
If someone is naughty, then he is not small.
If there is someone who is either small or bloody, then Claudia is attentive.
It can be concluded that Andrew is naughty once knowing that Maggie is obedient.
Someone who is eithor careful or attentive is always not naughty.
Sandy being careful and Claudia being not naughty imply that Sandy is small.
Claude is careful if and only if Claude is not obedient.
Someone who is both bloody and not naughty is always obedient.
If someone is both not naughty and small, then he is obedient.
Someone being not naughty is equivalent to being bloody.
If there is at least one people who is not attentive, then Andrew is obedient and Andrew is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is obedient, then Andrew is bloody. | Maggie is obedient. | entailment |
Andrew is attentive.
Andrew is naughty.
Isabel is not small.
Claudia is careful.
Maggie is not bloody.
Claude is not small.
Claudia is small.
Claudia is bloody.
Claude is not careful.
Maggie is attentive.
Andrew is bloody.
Andrew is small.If Clark is not small or Sandy is bloody, then Sandy is not naughty.
If someone is naughty, then he is not small.
If there is someone who is either small or bloody, then Claudia is attentive.
It can be concluded that Andrew is naughty once knowing that Maggie is obedient.
Someone who is eithor careful or attentive is always not naughty.
Sandy being careful and Claudia being not naughty imply that Sandy is small.
Claude is careful if and only if Claude is not obedient.
Someone who is both bloody and not naughty is always obedient.
If someone is both not naughty and small, then he is obedient.
Someone being not naughty is equivalent to being bloody.
If there is at least one people who is not attentive, then Andrew is obedient and Andrew is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is obedient, then Andrew is bloody. | Claude is not careful. | entailment |
Andrew is attentive.
Andrew is naughty.
Isabel is not small.
Claudia is careful.
Maggie is not bloody.
Claude is not small.
Claudia is small.
Claudia is bloody.
Claude is not careful.
Maggie is attentive.
Andrew is bloody.
Andrew is small.If Clark is not small or Sandy is bloody, then Sandy is not naughty.
If someone is naughty, then he is not small.
If there is someone who is either small or bloody, then Claudia is attentive.
It can be concluded that Andrew is naughty once knowing that Maggie is obedient.
Someone who is eithor careful or attentive is always not naughty.
Sandy being careful and Claudia being not naughty imply that Sandy is small.
Claude is careful if and only if Claude is not obedient.
Someone who is both bloody and not naughty is always obedient.
If someone is both not naughty and small, then he is obedient.
Someone being not naughty is equivalent to being bloody.
If there is at least one people who is not attentive, then Andrew is obedient and Andrew is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is obedient, then Andrew is bloody. | Sandy is not naughty. | neutral |
Andrew is attentive.
Andrew is naughty.
Isabel is not small.
Claudia is careful.
Maggie is not bloody.
Claude is not small.
Claudia is small.
Claudia is bloody.
Claude is not careful.
Maggie is attentive.
Andrew is bloody.
Andrew is small.If Clark is not small or Sandy is bloody, then Sandy is not naughty.
If someone is naughty, then he is not small.
If there is someone who is either small or bloody, then Claudia is attentive.
It can be concluded that Andrew is naughty once knowing that Maggie is obedient.
Someone who is eithor careful or attentive is always not naughty.
Sandy being careful and Claudia being not naughty imply that Sandy is small.
Claude is careful if and only if Claude is not obedient.
Someone who is both bloody and not naughty is always obedient.
If someone is both not naughty and small, then he is obedient.
Someone being not naughty is equivalent to being bloody.
If there is at least one people who is not attentive, then Andrew is obedient and Andrew is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is obedient, then Andrew is bloody. | Claudia is not obedient. | contradiction |
Andrew is attentive.
Andrew is naughty.
Isabel is not small.
Claudia is careful.
Maggie is not bloody.
Claude is not small.
Claudia is small.
Claudia is bloody.
Claude is not careful.
Maggie is attentive.
Andrew is bloody.
Andrew is small.If Clark is not small or Sandy is bloody, then Sandy is not naughty.
If someone is naughty, then he is not small.
If there is someone who is either small or bloody, then Claudia is attentive.
It can be concluded that Andrew is naughty once knowing that Maggie is obedient.
Someone who is eithor careful or attentive is always not naughty.
Sandy being careful and Claudia being not naughty imply that Sandy is small.
Claude is careful if and only if Claude is not obedient.
Someone who is both bloody and not naughty is always obedient.
If someone is both not naughty and small, then he is obedient.
Someone being not naughty is equivalent to being bloody.
If there is at least one people who is not attentive, then Andrew is obedient and Andrew is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is obedient, then Andrew is bloody. | Andrew is naughty. | self_contradiction |
Andrew is attentive.
Andrew is naughty.
Isabel is not small.
Claudia is careful.
Maggie is not bloody.
Claude is not small.
Claudia is small.
Claudia is bloody.
Claude is not careful.
Maggie is attentive.
Andrew is bloody.
Andrew is small.If Clark is not small or Sandy is bloody, then Sandy is not naughty.
If someone is naughty, then he is not small.
If there is someone who is either small or bloody, then Claudia is attentive.
It can be concluded that Andrew is naughty once knowing that Maggie is obedient.
Someone who is eithor careful or attentive is always not naughty.
Sandy being careful and Claudia being not naughty imply that Sandy is small.
Claude is careful if and only if Claude is not obedient.
Someone who is both bloody and not naughty is always obedient.
If someone is both not naughty and small, then he is obedient.
Someone being not naughty is equivalent to being bloody.
If there is at least one people who is not attentive, then Andrew is obedient and Andrew is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is obedient, then Andrew is bloody. | Maggie is not naughty. | entailment |
Andrew is attentive.
Andrew is naughty.
Isabel is not small.
Claudia is careful.
Maggie is not bloody.
Claude is not small.
Claudia is small.
Claudia is bloody.
Claude is not careful.
Maggie is attentive.
Andrew is bloody.
Andrew is small.If Clark is not small or Sandy is bloody, then Sandy is not naughty.
If someone is naughty, then he is not small.
If there is someone who is either small or bloody, then Claudia is attentive.
It can be concluded that Andrew is naughty once knowing that Maggie is obedient.
Someone who is eithor careful or attentive is always not naughty.
Sandy being careful and Claudia being not naughty imply that Sandy is small.
Claude is careful if and only if Claude is not obedient.
Someone who is both bloody and not naughty is always obedient.
If someone is both not naughty and small, then he is obedient.
Someone being not naughty is equivalent to being bloody.
If there is at least one people who is not attentive, then Andrew is obedient and Andrew is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is obedient, then Andrew is bloody. | Andrew is small. | self_contradiction |
Andrew is attentive.
Andrew is naughty.
Isabel is not small.
Claudia is careful.
Maggie is not bloody.
Claude is not small.
Claudia is small.
Claudia is bloody.
Claude is not careful.
Maggie is attentive.
Andrew is bloody.
Andrew is small.If Clark is not small or Sandy is bloody, then Sandy is not naughty.
If someone is naughty, then he is not small.
If there is someone who is either small or bloody, then Claudia is attentive.
It can be concluded that Andrew is naughty once knowing that Maggie is obedient.
Someone who is eithor careful or attentive is always not naughty.
Sandy being careful and Claudia being not naughty imply that Sandy is small.
Claude is careful if and only if Claude is not obedient.
Someone who is both bloody and not naughty is always obedient.
If someone is both not naughty and small, then he is obedient.
Someone being not naughty is equivalent to being bloody.
If there is at least one people who is not attentive, then Andrew is obedient and Andrew is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is obedient, then Andrew is bloody. | Clark is not obedient. | neutral |
Jessie is not modern.
Konrad is rude.
Jessie is not massive.
Roswell is not massive.
Basil is modern.
Leona is not small.
Roswell is modern.
Basil is not thankful.
Leona is thankful.
Leona is rude.
Della is massive.
Jessie is not thankful.If there is someone who is either not massive or not modern, then Della is small and Roswell is not thankful.
Roswell being thankful implies that Chapman is helpless and Basil is modern.
If someone is not massive, then he is both thankful and not rude.
If there is someone who is not rude, then Leona is not thankful and Della is modern.
If there is someone who is not rude, then Chapman is not massive and Konrad is not modern.
If there is someone who is either modern or thankful, then Roswell is not helpless.
If everyone is massive, then Chapman is helpless and Leona is thankful.
Someone is modern if and only if he is rude.
If there is someone who is both thankful and not small, then Jessie is not helpless.
If there is at least one people who is both not helpless and thankful, then Chapman is not small.
If there is at least one people who is helpless, then Chapman is not small and Jessie is rude.
If Basil is not modern and Jessie is not massive, then Basil is rude and Chapman is thankful, and vice versa. | Della is not helpless. | neutral |
Jessie is not modern.
Konrad is rude.
Jessie is not massive.
Roswell is not massive.
Basil is modern.
Leona is not small.
Roswell is modern.
Basil is not thankful.
Leona is thankful.
Leona is rude.
Della is massive.
Jessie is not thankful.If there is someone who is either not massive or not modern, then Della is small and Roswell is not thankful.
Roswell being thankful implies that Chapman is helpless and Basil is modern.
If someone is not massive, then he is both thankful and not rude.
If there is someone who is not rude, then Leona is not thankful and Della is modern.
If there is someone who is not rude, then Chapman is not massive and Konrad is not modern.
If there is someone who is either modern or thankful, then Roswell is not helpless.
If everyone is massive, then Chapman is helpless and Leona is thankful.
Someone is modern if and only if he is rude.
If there is someone who is both thankful and not small, then Jessie is not helpless.
If there is at least one people who is both not helpless and thankful, then Chapman is not small.
If there is at least one people who is helpless, then Chapman is not small and Jessie is rude.
If Basil is not modern and Jessie is not massive, then Basil is rude and Chapman is thankful, and vice versa. | Roswell is helpless. | contradiction |
Jessie is not modern.
Konrad is rude.
Jessie is not massive.
Roswell is not massive.
Basil is modern.
Leona is not small.
Roswell is modern.
Basil is not thankful.
Leona is thankful.
Leona is rude.
Della is massive.
Jessie is not thankful.If there is someone who is either not massive or not modern, then Della is small and Roswell is not thankful.
Roswell being thankful implies that Chapman is helpless and Basil is modern.
If someone is not massive, then he is both thankful and not rude.
If there is someone who is not rude, then Leona is not thankful and Della is modern.
If there is someone who is not rude, then Chapman is not massive and Konrad is not modern.
If there is someone who is either modern or thankful, then Roswell is not helpless.
If everyone is massive, then Chapman is helpless and Leona is thankful.
Someone is modern if and only if he is rude.
If there is someone who is both thankful and not small, then Jessie is not helpless.
If there is at least one people who is both not helpless and thankful, then Chapman is not small.
If there is at least one people who is helpless, then Chapman is not small and Jessie is rude.
If Basil is not modern and Jessie is not massive, then Basil is rude and Chapman is thankful, and vice versa. | Jessie is rude. | self_contradiction |
Jessie is not modern.
Konrad is rude.
Jessie is not massive.
Roswell is not massive.
Basil is modern.
Leona is not small.
Roswell is modern.
Basil is not thankful.
Leona is thankful.
Leona is rude.
Della is massive.
Jessie is not thankful.If there is someone who is either not massive or not modern, then Della is small and Roswell is not thankful.
Roswell being thankful implies that Chapman is helpless and Basil is modern.
If someone is not massive, then he is both thankful and not rude.
If there is someone who is not rude, then Leona is not thankful and Della is modern.
If there is someone who is not rude, then Chapman is not massive and Konrad is not modern.
If there is someone who is either modern or thankful, then Roswell is not helpless.
If everyone is massive, then Chapman is helpless and Leona is thankful.
Someone is modern if and only if he is rude.
If there is someone who is both thankful and not small, then Jessie is not helpless.
If there is at least one people who is both not helpless and thankful, then Chapman is not small.
If there is at least one people who is helpless, then Chapman is not small and Jessie is rude.
If Basil is not modern and Jessie is not massive, then Basil is rude and Chapman is thankful, and vice versa. | Leona is not modern. | contradiction |
Jessie is not modern.
Konrad is rude.
Jessie is not massive.
Roswell is not massive.
Basil is modern.
Leona is not small.
Roswell is modern.
Basil is not thankful.
Leona is thankful.
Leona is rude.
Della is massive.
Jessie is not thankful.If there is someone who is either not massive or not modern, then Della is small and Roswell is not thankful.
Roswell being thankful implies that Chapman is helpless and Basil is modern.
If someone is not massive, then he is both thankful and not rude.
If there is someone who is not rude, then Leona is not thankful and Della is modern.
If there is someone who is not rude, then Chapman is not massive and Konrad is not modern.
If there is someone who is either modern or thankful, then Roswell is not helpless.
If everyone is massive, then Chapman is helpless and Leona is thankful.
Someone is modern if and only if he is rude.
If there is someone who is both thankful and not small, then Jessie is not helpless.
If there is at least one people who is both not helpless and thankful, then Chapman is not small.
If there is at least one people who is helpless, then Chapman is not small and Jessie is rude.
If Basil is not modern and Jessie is not massive, then Basil is rude and Chapman is thankful, and vice versa. | Della is not small. | contradiction |
Jessie is not modern.
Konrad is rude.
Jessie is not massive.
Roswell is not massive.
Basil is modern.
Leona is not small.
Roswell is modern.
Basil is not thankful.
Leona is thankful.
Leona is rude.
Della is massive.
Jessie is not thankful.If there is someone who is either not massive or not modern, then Della is small and Roswell is not thankful.
Roswell being thankful implies that Chapman is helpless and Basil is modern.
If someone is not massive, then he is both thankful and not rude.
If there is someone who is not rude, then Leona is not thankful and Della is modern.
If there is someone who is not rude, then Chapman is not massive and Konrad is not modern.
If there is someone who is either modern or thankful, then Roswell is not helpless.
If everyone is massive, then Chapman is helpless and Leona is thankful.
Someone is modern if and only if he is rude.
If there is someone who is both thankful and not small, then Jessie is not helpless.
If there is at least one people who is both not helpless and thankful, then Chapman is not small.
If there is at least one people who is helpless, then Chapman is not small and Jessie is rude.
If Basil is not modern and Jessie is not massive, then Basil is rude and Chapman is thankful, and vice versa. | Konrad is modern. | self_contradiction |
Jessie is not modern.
Konrad is rude.
Jessie is not massive.
Roswell is not massive.
Basil is modern.
Leona is not small.
Roswell is modern.
Basil is not thankful.
Leona is thankful.
Leona is rude.
Della is massive.
Jessie is not thankful.If there is someone who is either not massive or not modern, then Della is small and Roswell is not thankful.
Roswell being thankful implies that Chapman is helpless and Basil is modern.
If someone is not massive, then he is both thankful and not rude.
If there is someone who is not rude, then Leona is not thankful and Della is modern.
If there is someone who is not rude, then Chapman is not massive and Konrad is not modern.
If there is someone who is either modern or thankful, then Roswell is not helpless.
If everyone is massive, then Chapman is helpless and Leona is thankful.
Someone is modern if and only if he is rude.
If there is someone who is both thankful and not small, then Jessie is not helpless.
If there is at least one people who is both not helpless and thankful, then Chapman is not small.
If there is at least one people who is helpless, then Chapman is not small and Jessie is rude.
If Basil is not modern and Jessie is not massive, then Basil is rude and Chapman is thankful, and vice versa. | Roswell is massive. | contradiction |
Jessie is not modern.
Konrad is rude.
Jessie is not massive.
Roswell is not massive.
Basil is modern.
Leona is not small.
Roswell is modern.
Basil is not thankful.
Leona is thankful.
Leona is rude.
Della is massive.
Jessie is not thankful.If there is someone who is either not massive or not modern, then Della is small and Roswell is not thankful.
Roswell being thankful implies that Chapman is helpless and Basil is modern.
If someone is not massive, then he is both thankful and not rude.
If there is someone who is not rude, then Leona is not thankful and Della is modern.
If there is someone who is not rude, then Chapman is not massive and Konrad is not modern.
If there is someone who is either modern or thankful, then Roswell is not helpless.
If everyone is massive, then Chapman is helpless and Leona is thankful.
Someone is modern if and only if he is rude.
If there is someone who is both thankful and not small, then Jessie is not helpless.
If there is at least one people who is both not helpless and thankful, then Chapman is not small.
If there is at least one people who is helpless, then Chapman is not small and Jessie is rude.
If Basil is not modern and Jessie is not massive, then Basil is rude and Chapman is thankful, and vice versa. | Chapman is not small. | entailment |
Jessie is not modern.
Konrad is rude.
Jessie is not massive.
Roswell is not massive.
Basil is modern.
Leona is not small.
Roswell is modern.
Basil is not thankful.
Leona is thankful.
Leona is rude.
Della is massive.
Jessie is not thankful.If there is someone who is either not massive or not modern, then Della is small and Roswell is not thankful.
Roswell being thankful implies that Chapman is helpless and Basil is modern.
If someone is not massive, then he is both thankful and not rude.
If there is someone who is not rude, then Leona is not thankful and Della is modern.
If there is someone who is not rude, then Chapman is not massive and Konrad is not modern.
If there is someone who is either modern or thankful, then Roswell is not helpless.
If everyone is massive, then Chapman is helpless and Leona is thankful.
Someone is modern if and only if he is rude.
If there is someone who is both thankful and not small, then Jessie is not helpless.
If there is at least one people who is both not helpless and thankful, then Chapman is not small.
If there is at least one people who is helpless, then Chapman is not small and Jessie is rude.
If Basil is not modern and Jessie is not massive, then Basil is rude and Chapman is thankful, and vice versa. | Jessie is small. | neutral |
Jessie is not modern.
Konrad is rude.
Jessie is not massive.
Roswell is not massive.
Basil is modern.
Leona is not small.
Roswell is modern.
Basil is not thankful.
Leona is thankful.
Leona is rude.
Della is massive.
Jessie is not thankful.If there is someone who is either not massive or not modern, then Della is small and Roswell is not thankful.
Roswell being thankful implies that Chapman is helpless and Basil is modern.
If someone is not massive, then he is both thankful and not rude.
If there is someone who is not rude, then Leona is not thankful and Della is modern.
If there is someone who is not rude, then Chapman is not massive and Konrad is not modern.
If there is someone who is either modern or thankful, then Roswell is not helpless.
If everyone is massive, then Chapman is helpless and Leona is thankful.
Someone is modern if and only if he is rude.
If there is someone who is both thankful and not small, then Jessie is not helpless.
If there is at least one people who is both not helpless and thankful, then Chapman is not small.
If there is at least one people who is helpless, then Chapman is not small and Jessie is rude.
If Basil is not modern and Jessie is not massive, then Basil is rude and Chapman is thankful, and vice versa. | Jessie is not thankful. | self_contradiction |
Jessie is not modern.
Konrad is rude.
Jessie is not massive.
Roswell is not massive.
Basil is modern.
Leona is not small.
Roswell is modern.
Basil is not thankful.
Leona is thankful.
Leona is rude.
Della is massive.
Jessie is not thankful.If there is someone who is either not massive or not modern, then Della is small and Roswell is not thankful.
Roswell being thankful implies that Chapman is helpless and Basil is modern.
If someone is not massive, then he is both thankful and not rude.
If there is someone who is not rude, then Leona is not thankful and Della is modern.
If there is someone who is not rude, then Chapman is not massive and Konrad is not modern.
If there is someone who is either modern or thankful, then Roswell is not helpless.
If everyone is massive, then Chapman is helpless and Leona is thankful.
Someone is modern if and only if he is rude.
If there is someone who is both thankful and not small, then Jessie is not helpless.
If there is at least one people who is both not helpless and thankful, then Chapman is not small.
If there is at least one people who is helpless, then Chapman is not small and Jessie is rude.
If Basil is not modern and Jessie is not massive, then Basil is rude and Chapman is thankful, and vice versa. | Jessie is not small. | neutral |
Jessie is not modern.
Konrad is rude.
Jessie is not massive.
Roswell is not massive.
Basil is modern.
Leona is not small.
Roswell is modern.
Basil is not thankful.
Leona is thankful.
Leona is rude.
Della is massive.
Jessie is not thankful.If there is someone who is either not massive or not modern, then Della is small and Roswell is not thankful.
Roswell being thankful implies that Chapman is helpless and Basil is modern.
If someone is not massive, then he is both thankful and not rude.
If there is someone who is not rude, then Leona is not thankful and Della is modern.
If there is someone who is not rude, then Chapman is not massive and Konrad is not modern.
If there is someone who is either modern or thankful, then Roswell is not helpless.
If everyone is massive, then Chapman is helpless and Leona is thankful.
Someone is modern if and only if he is rude.
If there is someone who is both thankful and not small, then Jessie is not helpless.
If there is at least one people who is both not helpless and thankful, then Chapman is not small.
If there is at least one people who is helpless, then Chapman is not small and Jessie is rude.
If Basil is not modern and Jessie is not massive, then Basil is rude and Chapman is thankful, and vice versa. | Leona is rude. | entailment |
Jessie is not modern.
Konrad is rude.
Jessie is not massive.
Roswell is not massive.
Basil is modern.
Leona is not small.
Roswell is modern.
Basil is not thankful.
Leona is thankful.
Leona is rude.
Della is massive.
Jessie is not thankful.If there is someone who is either not massive or not modern, then Della is small and Roswell is not thankful.
Roswell being thankful implies that Chapman is helpless and Basil is modern.
If someone is not massive, then he is both thankful and not rude.
If there is someone who is not rude, then Leona is not thankful and Della is modern.
If there is someone who is not rude, then Chapman is not massive and Konrad is not modern.
If there is someone who is either modern or thankful, then Roswell is not helpless.
If everyone is massive, then Chapman is helpless and Leona is thankful.
Someone is modern if and only if he is rude.
If there is someone who is both thankful and not small, then Jessie is not helpless.
If there is at least one people who is both not helpless and thankful, then Chapman is not small.
If there is at least one people who is helpless, then Chapman is not small and Jessie is rude.
If Basil is not modern and Jessie is not massive, then Basil is rude and Chapman is thankful, and vice versa. | Konrad is not thankful. | neutral |
Jessie is not modern.
Konrad is rude.
Jessie is not massive.
Roswell is not massive.
Basil is modern.
Leona is not small.
Roswell is modern.
Basil is not thankful.
Leona is thankful.
Leona is rude.
Della is massive.
Jessie is not thankful.If there is someone who is either not massive or not modern, then Della is small and Roswell is not thankful.
Roswell being thankful implies that Chapman is helpless and Basil is modern.
If someone is not massive, then he is both thankful and not rude.
If there is someone who is not rude, then Leona is not thankful and Della is modern.
If there is someone who is not rude, then Chapman is not massive and Konrad is not modern.
If there is someone who is either modern or thankful, then Roswell is not helpless.
If everyone is massive, then Chapman is helpless and Leona is thankful.
Someone is modern if and only if he is rude.
If there is someone who is both thankful and not small, then Jessie is not helpless.
If there is at least one people who is both not helpless and thankful, then Chapman is not small.
If there is at least one people who is helpless, then Chapman is not small and Jessie is rude.
If Basil is not modern and Jessie is not massive, then Basil is rude and Chapman is thankful, and vice versa. | Basil is thankful. | contradiction |
Jessie is not modern.
Konrad is rude.
Jessie is not massive.
Roswell is not massive.
Basil is modern.
Leona is not small.
Roswell is modern.
Basil is not thankful.
Leona is thankful.
Leona is rude.
Della is massive.
Jessie is not thankful.If there is someone who is either not massive or not modern, then Della is small and Roswell is not thankful.
Roswell being thankful implies that Chapman is helpless and Basil is modern.
If someone is not massive, then he is both thankful and not rude.
If there is someone who is not rude, then Leona is not thankful and Della is modern.
If there is someone who is not rude, then Chapman is not massive and Konrad is not modern.
If there is someone who is either modern or thankful, then Roswell is not helpless.
If everyone is massive, then Chapman is helpless and Leona is thankful.
Someone is modern if and only if he is rude.
If there is someone who is both thankful and not small, then Jessie is not helpless.
If there is at least one people who is both not helpless and thankful, then Chapman is not small.
If there is at least one people who is helpless, then Chapman is not small and Jessie is rude.
If Basil is not modern and Jessie is not massive, then Basil is rude and Chapman is thankful, and vice versa. | Leona is not massive. | neutral |
Jessie is not modern.
Konrad is rude.
Jessie is not massive.
Roswell is not massive.
Basil is modern.
Leona is not small.
Roswell is modern.
Basil is not thankful.
Leona is thankful.
Leona is rude.
Della is massive.
Jessie is not thankful.If there is someone who is either not massive or not modern, then Della is small and Roswell is not thankful.
Roswell being thankful implies that Chapman is helpless and Basil is modern.
If someone is not massive, then he is both thankful and not rude.
If there is someone who is not rude, then Leona is not thankful and Della is modern.
If there is someone who is not rude, then Chapman is not massive and Konrad is not modern.
If there is someone who is either modern or thankful, then Roswell is not helpless.
If everyone is massive, then Chapman is helpless and Leona is thankful.
Someone is modern if and only if he is rude.
If there is someone who is both thankful and not small, then Jessie is not helpless.
If there is at least one people who is both not helpless and thankful, then Chapman is not small.
If there is at least one people who is helpless, then Chapman is not small and Jessie is rude.
If Basil is not modern and Jessie is not massive, then Basil is rude and Chapman is thankful, and vice versa. | Jessie is not rude. | self_contradiction |
Jessie is not modern.
Konrad is rude.
Jessie is not massive.
Roswell is not massive.
Basil is modern.
Leona is not small.
Roswell is modern.
Basil is not thankful.
Leona is thankful.
Leona is rude.
Della is massive.
Jessie is not thankful.If there is someone who is either not massive or not modern, then Della is small and Roswell is not thankful.
Roswell being thankful implies that Chapman is helpless and Basil is modern.
If someone is not massive, then he is both thankful and not rude.
If there is someone who is not rude, then Leona is not thankful and Della is modern.
If there is someone who is not rude, then Chapman is not massive and Konrad is not modern.
If there is someone who is either modern or thankful, then Roswell is not helpless.
If everyone is massive, then Chapman is helpless and Leona is thankful.
Someone is modern if and only if he is rude.
If there is someone who is both thankful and not small, then Jessie is not helpless.
If there is at least one people who is both not helpless and thankful, then Chapman is not small.
If there is at least one people who is helpless, then Chapman is not small and Jessie is rude.
If Basil is not modern and Jessie is not massive, then Basil is rude and Chapman is thankful, and vice versa. | Chapman is thankful. | entailment |
Jessie is not modern.
Konrad is rude.
Jessie is not massive.
Roswell is not massive.
Basil is modern.
Leona is not small.
Roswell is modern.
Basil is not thankful.
Leona is thankful.
Leona is rude.
Della is massive.
Jessie is not thankful.If there is someone who is either not massive or not modern, then Della is small and Roswell is not thankful.
Roswell being thankful implies that Chapman is helpless and Basil is modern.
If someone is not massive, then he is both thankful and not rude.
If there is someone who is not rude, then Leona is not thankful and Della is modern.
If there is someone who is not rude, then Chapman is not massive and Konrad is not modern.
If there is someone who is either modern or thankful, then Roswell is not helpless.
If everyone is massive, then Chapman is helpless and Leona is thankful.
Someone is modern if and only if he is rude.
If there is someone who is both thankful and not small, then Jessie is not helpless.
If there is at least one people who is both not helpless and thankful, then Chapman is not small.
If there is at least one people who is helpless, then Chapman is not small and Jessie is rude.
If Basil is not modern and Jessie is not massive, then Basil is rude and Chapman is thankful, and vice versa. | Roswell is thankful. | self_contradiction |
Jessie is not modern.
Konrad is rude.
Jessie is not massive.
Roswell is not massive.
Basil is modern.
Leona is not small.
Roswell is modern.
Basil is not thankful.
Leona is thankful.
Leona is rude.
Della is massive.
Jessie is not thankful.If there is someone who is either not massive or not modern, then Della is small and Roswell is not thankful.
Roswell being thankful implies that Chapman is helpless and Basil is modern.
If someone is not massive, then he is both thankful and not rude.
If there is someone who is not rude, then Leona is not thankful and Della is modern.
If there is someone who is not rude, then Chapman is not massive and Konrad is not modern.
If there is someone who is either modern or thankful, then Roswell is not helpless.
If everyone is massive, then Chapman is helpless and Leona is thankful.
Someone is modern if and only if he is rude.
If there is someone who is both thankful and not small, then Jessie is not helpless.
If there is at least one people who is both not helpless and thankful, then Chapman is not small.
If there is at least one people who is helpless, then Chapman is not small and Jessie is rude.
If Basil is not modern and Jessie is not massive, then Basil is rude and Chapman is thankful, and vice versa. | Roswell is modern. | entailment |
Jessie is not modern.
Konrad is rude.
Jessie is not massive.
Roswell is not massive.
Basil is modern.
Leona is not small.
Roswell is modern.
Basil is not thankful.
Leona is thankful.
Leona is rude.
Della is massive.
Jessie is not thankful.If there is someone who is either not massive or not modern, then Della is small and Roswell is not thankful.
Roswell being thankful implies that Chapman is helpless and Basil is modern.
If someone is not massive, then he is both thankful and not rude.
If there is someone who is not rude, then Leona is not thankful and Della is modern.
If there is someone who is not rude, then Chapman is not massive and Konrad is not modern.
If there is someone who is either modern or thankful, then Roswell is not helpless.
If everyone is massive, then Chapman is helpless and Leona is thankful.
Someone is modern if and only if he is rude.
If there is someone who is both thankful and not small, then Jessie is not helpless.
If there is at least one people who is both not helpless and thankful, then Chapman is not small.
If there is at least one people who is helpless, then Chapman is not small and Jessie is rude.
If Basil is not modern and Jessie is not massive, then Basil is rude and Chapman is thankful, and vice versa. | Roswell is not helpless. | entailment |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.