premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Grant is not magnificent.
Casper is excited.
Tommy is not depressed.
Grant is tense.
Mark is depressed.
Mark is not excited.
Mark is not adventurous.
Tommy is magnificent.
Casper is not depressed.
Kelsey is not tense.
Mark is not magnificent.
Tommy is adventurous.As long as someone is tense, he is magnificent and not desperate.
Mark being not adventurous implies that Casper is depressed.
If someone is not adventurous, then he is magnificent, and vice versa.
If Odessa is tense or Aedan is adventurous, then Odessa is depressed.
If there is at least one people who is both not desperate and not depressed, then Mark is magnificent.
If Mark is tense, then Grant is excited and Casper is magnificent, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not magnificent or not depressed, then Odessa is excited.
It can be concluded that Tommy is not adventurous once knowing that Tommy is excited or Kelsey is desperate.
If there is someone who is not desperate, then Mark is not adventurous and Tommy is not depressed.
Odessa being not excited is equivalent to Kelsey being not adventurous and Grant being depressed.
Someone is not magnificent and tense if and only if he is not excited.
If there is at least one people who is magnificent, then Odessa is tense and Kelsey is desperate. | Aedan is depressed. | neutral |
Grant is not magnificent.
Casper is excited.
Tommy is not depressed.
Grant is tense.
Mark is depressed.
Mark is not excited.
Mark is not adventurous.
Tommy is magnificent.
Casper is not depressed.
Kelsey is not tense.
Mark is not magnificent.
Tommy is adventurous.As long as someone is tense, he is magnificent and not desperate.
Mark being not adventurous implies that Casper is depressed.
If someone is not adventurous, then he is magnificent, and vice versa.
If Odessa is tense or Aedan is adventurous, then Odessa is depressed.
If there is at least one people who is both not desperate and not depressed, then Mark is magnificent.
If Mark is tense, then Grant is excited and Casper is magnificent, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not magnificent or not depressed, then Odessa is excited.
It can be concluded that Tommy is not adventurous once knowing that Tommy is excited or Kelsey is desperate.
If there is someone who is not desperate, then Mark is not adventurous and Tommy is not depressed.
Odessa being not excited is equivalent to Kelsey being not adventurous and Grant being depressed.
Someone is not magnificent and tense if and only if he is not excited.
If there is at least one people who is magnificent, then Odessa is tense and Kelsey is desperate. | Kelsey is not desperate. | contradiction |
Grant is not magnificent.
Casper is excited.
Tommy is not depressed.
Grant is tense.
Mark is depressed.
Mark is not excited.
Mark is not adventurous.
Tommy is magnificent.
Casper is not depressed.
Kelsey is not tense.
Mark is not magnificent.
Tommy is adventurous.As long as someone is tense, he is magnificent and not desperate.
Mark being not adventurous implies that Casper is depressed.
If someone is not adventurous, then he is magnificent, and vice versa.
If Odessa is tense or Aedan is adventurous, then Odessa is depressed.
If there is at least one people who is both not desperate and not depressed, then Mark is magnificent.
If Mark is tense, then Grant is excited and Casper is magnificent, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not magnificent or not depressed, then Odessa is excited.
It can be concluded that Tommy is not adventurous once knowing that Tommy is excited or Kelsey is desperate.
If there is someone who is not desperate, then Mark is not adventurous and Tommy is not depressed.
Odessa being not excited is equivalent to Kelsey being not adventurous and Grant being depressed.
Someone is not magnificent and tense if and only if he is not excited.
If there is at least one people who is magnificent, then Odessa is tense and Kelsey is desperate. | Aedan is not tense. | neutral |
Grant is not magnificent.
Casper is excited.
Tommy is not depressed.
Grant is tense.
Mark is depressed.
Mark is not excited.
Mark is not adventurous.
Tommy is magnificent.
Casper is not depressed.
Kelsey is not tense.
Mark is not magnificent.
Tommy is adventurous.As long as someone is tense, he is magnificent and not desperate.
Mark being not adventurous implies that Casper is depressed.
If someone is not adventurous, then he is magnificent, and vice versa.
If Odessa is tense or Aedan is adventurous, then Odessa is depressed.
If there is at least one people who is both not desperate and not depressed, then Mark is magnificent.
If Mark is tense, then Grant is excited and Casper is magnificent, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not magnificent or not depressed, then Odessa is excited.
It can be concluded that Tommy is not adventurous once knowing that Tommy is excited or Kelsey is desperate.
If there is someone who is not desperate, then Mark is not adventurous and Tommy is not depressed.
Odessa being not excited is equivalent to Kelsey being not adventurous and Grant being depressed.
Someone is not magnificent and tense if and only if he is not excited.
If there is at least one people who is magnificent, then Odessa is tense and Kelsey is desperate. | Grant is excited. | self_contradiction |
Grant is not magnificent.
Casper is excited.
Tommy is not depressed.
Grant is tense.
Mark is depressed.
Mark is not excited.
Mark is not adventurous.
Tommy is magnificent.
Casper is not depressed.
Kelsey is not tense.
Mark is not magnificent.
Tommy is adventurous.As long as someone is tense, he is magnificent and not desperate.
Mark being not adventurous implies that Casper is depressed.
If someone is not adventurous, then he is magnificent, and vice versa.
If Odessa is tense or Aedan is adventurous, then Odessa is depressed.
If there is at least one people who is both not desperate and not depressed, then Mark is magnificent.
If Mark is tense, then Grant is excited and Casper is magnificent, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not magnificent or not depressed, then Odessa is excited.
It can be concluded that Tommy is not adventurous once knowing that Tommy is excited or Kelsey is desperate.
If there is someone who is not desperate, then Mark is not adventurous and Tommy is not depressed.
Odessa being not excited is equivalent to Kelsey being not adventurous and Grant being depressed.
Someone is not magnificent and tense if and only if he is not excited.
If there is at least one people who is magnificent, then Odessa is tense and Kelsey is desperate. | Mark is not depressed. | contradiction |
Grant is not magnificent.
Casper is excited.
Tommy is not depressed.
Grant is tense.
Mark is depressed.
Mark is not excited.
Mark is not adventurous.
Tommy is magnificent.
Casper is not depressed.
Kelsey is not tense.
Mark is not magnificent.
Tommy is adventurous.As long as someone is tense, he is magnificent and not desperate.
Mark being not adventurous implies that Casper is depressed.
If someone is not adventurous, then he is magnificent, and vice versa.
If Odessa is tense or Aedan is adventurous, then Odessa is depressed.
If there is at least one people who is both not desperate and not depressed, then Mark is magnificent.
If Mark is tense, then Grant is excited and Casper is magnificent, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not magnificent or not depressed, then Odessa is excited.
It can be concluded that Tommy is not adventurous once knowing that Tommy is excited or Kelsey is desperate.
If there is someone who is not desperate, then Mark is not adventurous and Tommy is not depressed.
Odessa being not excited is equivalent to Kelsey being not adventurous and Grant being depressed.
Someone is not magnificent and tense if and only if he is not excited.
If there is at least one people who is magnificent, then Odessa is tense and Kelsey is desperate. | Mark is not desperate. | entailment |
Grant is not magnificent.
Casper is excited.
Tommy is not depressed.
Grant is tense.
Mark is depressed.
Mark is not excited.
Mark is not adventurous.
Tommy is magnificent.
Casper is not depressed.
Kelsey is not tense.
Mark is not magnificent.
Tommy is adventurous.As long as someone is tense, he is magnificent and not desperate.
Mark being not adventurous implies that Casper is depressed.
If someone is not adventurous, then he is magnificent, and vice versa.
If Odessa is tense or Aedan is adventurous, then Odessa is depressed.
If there is at least one people who is both not desperate and not depressed, then Mark is magnificent.
If Mark is tense, then Grant is excited and Casper is magnificent, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not magnificent or not depressed, then Odessa is excited.
It can be concluded that Tommy is not adventurous once knowing that Tommy is excited or Kelsey is desperate.
If there is someone who is not desperate, then Mark is not adventurous and Tommy is not depressed.
Odessa being not excited is equivalent to Kelsey being not adventurous and Grant being depressed.
Someone is not magnificent and tense if and only if he is not excited.
If there is at least one people who is magnificent, then Odessa is tense and Kelsey is desperate. | Odessa is desperate. | contradiction |
Grant is not magnificent.
Casper is excited.
Tommy is not depressed.
Grant is tense.
Mark is depressed.
Mark is not excited.
Mark is not adventurous.
Tommy is magnificent.
Casper is not depressed.
Kelsey is not tense.
Mark is not magnificent.
Tommy is adventurous.As long as someone is tense, he is magnificent and not desperate.
Mark being not adventurous implies that Casper is depressed.
If someone is not adventurous, then he is magnificent, and vice versa.
If Odessa is tense or Aedan is adventurous, then Odessa is depressed.
If there is at least one people who is both not desperate and not depressed, then Mark is magnificent.
If Mark is tense, then Grant is excited and Casper is magnificent, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not magnificent or not depressed, then Odessa is excited.
It can be concluded that Tommy is not adventurous once knowing that Tommy is excited or Kelsey is desperate.
If there is someone who is not desperate, then Mark is not adventurous and Tommy is not depressed.
Odessa being not excited is equivalent to Kelsey being not adventurous and Grant being depressed.
Someone is not magnificent and tense if and only if he is not excited.
If there is at least one people who is magnificent, then Odessa is tense and Kelsey is desperate. | Tommy is not adventurous. | self_contradiction |
Grant is not magnificent.
Casper is excited.
Tommy is not depressed.
Grant is tense.
Mark is depressed.
Mark is not excited.
Mark is not adventurous.
Tommy is magnificent.
Casper is not depressed.
Kelsey is not tense.
Mark is not magnificent.
Tommy is adventurous.As long as someone is tense, he is magnificent and not desperate.
Mark being not adventurous implies that Casper is depressed.
If someone is not adventurous, then he is magnificent, and vice versa.
If Odessa is tense or Aedan is adventurous, then Odessa is depressed.
If there is at least one people who is both not desperate and not depressed, then Mark is magnificent.
If Mark is tense, then Grant is excited and Casper is magnificent, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not magnificent or not depressed, then Odessa is excited.
It can be concluded that Tommy is not adventurous once knowing that Tommy is excited or Kelsey is desperate.
If there is someone who is not desperate, then Mark is not adventurous and Tommy is not depressed.
Odessa being not excited is equivalent to Kelsey being not adventurous and Grant being depressed.
Someone is not magnificent and tense if and only if he is not excited.
If there is at least one people who is magnificent, then Odessa is tense and Kelsey is desperate. | Odessa is adventurous. | contradiction |
Grant is not magnificent.
Casper is excited.
Tommy is not depressed.
Grant is tense.
Mark is depressed.
Mark is not excited.
Mark is not adventurous.
Tommy is magnificent.
Casper is not depressed.
Kelsey is not tense.
Mark is not magnificent.
Tommy is adventurous.As long as someone is tense, he is magnificent and not desperate.
Mark being not adventurous implies that Casper is depressed.
If someone is not adventurous, then he is magnificent, and vice versa.
If Odessa is tense or Aedan is adventurous, then Odessa is depressed.
If there is at least one people who is both not desperate and not depressed, then Mark is magnificent.
If Mark is tense, then Grant is excited and Casper is magnificent, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not magnificent or not depressed, then Odessa is excited.
It can be concluded that Tommy is not adventurous once knowing that Tommy is excited or Kelsey is desperate.
If there is someone who is not desperate, then Mark is not adventurous and Tommy is not depressed.
Odessa being not excited is equivalent to Kelsey being not adventurous and Grant being depressed.
Someone is not magnificent and tense if and only if he is not excited.
If there is at least one people who is magnificent, then Odessa is tense and Kelsey is desperate. | Kelsey is magnificent. | neutral |
Grant is not magnificent.
Casper is excited.
Tommy is not depressed.
Grant is tense.
Mark is depressed.
Mark is not excited.
Mark is not adventurous.
Tommy is magnificent.
Casper is not depressed.
Kelsey is not tense.
Mark is not magnificent.
Tommy is adventurous.As long as someone is tense, he is magnificent and not desperate.
Mark being not adventurous implies that Casper is depressed.
If someone is not adventurous, then he is magnificent, and vice versa.
If Odessa is tense or Aedan is adventurous, then Odessa is depressed.
If there is at least one people who is both not desperate and not depressed, then Mark is magnificent.
If Mark is tense, then Grant is excited and Casper is magnificent, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not magnificent or not depressed, then Odessa is excited.
It can be concluded that Tommy is not adventurous once knowing that Tommy is excited or Kelsey is desperate.
If there is someone who is not desperate, then Mark is not adventurous and Tommy is not depressed.
Odessa being not excited is equivalent to Kelsey being not adventurous and Grant being depressed.
Someone is not magnificent and tense if and only if he is not excited.
If there is at least one people who is magnificent, then Odessa is tense and Kelsey is desperate. | Casper is not desperate. | neutral |
Grant is not magnificent.
Casper is excited.
Tommy is not depressed.
Grant is tense.
Mark is depressed.
Mark is not excited.
Mark is not adventurous.
Tommy is magnificent.
Casper is not depressed.
Kelsey is not tense.
Mark is not magnificent.
Tommy is adventurous.As long as someone is tense, he is magnificent and not desperate.
Mark being not adventurous implies that Casper is depressed.
If someone is not adventurous, then he is magnificent, and vice versa.
If Odessa is tense or Aedan is adventurous, then Odessa is depressed.
If there is at least one people who is both not desperate and not depressed, then Mark is magnificent.
If Mark is tense, then Grant is excited and Casper is magnificent, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not magnificent or not depressed, then Odessa is excited.
It can be concluded that Tommy is not adventurous once knowing that Tommy is excited or Kelsey is desperate.
If there is someone who is not desperate, then Mark is not adventurous and Tommy is not depressed.
Odessa being not excited is equivalent to Kelsey being not adventurous and Grant being depressed.
Someone is not magnificent and tense if and only if he is not excited.
If there is at least one people who is magnificent, then Odessa is tense and Kelsey is desperate. | Grant is magnificent. | self_contradiction |
Grant is not magnificent.
Casper is excited.
Tommy is not depressed.
Grant is tense.
Mark is depressed.
Mark is not excited.
Mark is not adventurous.
Tommy is magnificent.
Casper is not depressed.
Kelsey is not tense.
Mark is not magnificent.
Tommy is adventurous.As long as someone is tense, he is magnificent and not desperate.
Mark being not adventurous implies that Casper is depressed.
If someone is not adventurous, then he is magnificent, and vice versa.
If Odessa is tense or Aedan is adventurous, then Odessa is depressed.
If there is at least one people who is both not desperate and not depressed, then Mark is magnificent.
If Mark is tense, then Grant is excited and Casper is magnificent, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not magnificent or not depressed, then Odessa is excited.
It can be concluded that Tommy is not adventurous once knowing that Tommy is excited or Kelsey is desperate.
If there is someone who is not desperate, then Mark is not adventurous and Tommy is not depressed.
Odessa being not excited is equivalent to Kelsey being not adventurous and Grant being depressed.
Someone is not magnificent and tense if and only if he is not excited.
If there is at least one people who is magnificent, then Odessa is tense and Kelsey is desperate. | Casper is excited. | entailment |
Grant is not magnificent.
Casper is excited.
Tommy is not depressed.
Grant is tense.
Mark is depressed.
Mark is not excited.
Mark is not adventurous.
Tommy is magnificent.
Casper is not depressed.
Kelsey is not tense.
Mark is not magnificent.
Tommy is adventurous.As long as someone is tense, he is magnificent and not desperate.
Mark being not adventurous implies that Casper is depressed.
If someone is not adventurous, then he is magnificent, and vice versa.
If Odessa is tense or Aedan is adventurous, then Odessa is depressed.
If there is at least one people who is both not desperate and not depressed, then Mark is magnificent.
If Mark is tense, then Grant is excited and Casper is magnificent, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not magnificent or not depressed, then Odessa is excited.
It can be concluded that Tommy is not adventurous once knowing that Tommy is excited or Kelsey is desperate.
If there is someone who is not desperate, then Mark is not adventurous and Tommy is not depressed.
Odessa being not excited is equivalent to Kelsey being not adventurous and Grant being depressed.
Someone is not magnificent and tense if and only if he is not excited.
If there is at least one people who is magnificent, then Odessa is tense and Kelsey is desperate. | Tommy is magnificent. | entailment |
Grant is not magnificent.
Casper is excited.
Tommy is not depressed.
Grant is tense.
Mark is depressed.
Mark is not excited.
Mark is not adventurous.
Tommy is magnificent.
Casper is not depressed.
Kelsey is not tense.
Mark is not magnificent.
Tommy is adventurous.As long as someone is tense, he is magnificent and not desperate.
Mark being not adventurous implies that Casper is depressed.
If someone is not adventurous, then he is magnificent, and vice versa.
If Odessa is tense or Aedan is adventurous, then Odessa is depressed.
If there is at least one people who is both not desperate and not depressed, then Mark is magnificent.
If Mark is tense, then Grant is excited and Casper is magnificent, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not magnificent or not depressed, then Odessa is excited.
It can be concluded that Tommy is not adventurous once knowing that Tommy is excited or Kelsey is desperate.
If there is someone who is not desperate, then Mark is not adventurous and Tommy is not depressed.
Odessa being not excited is equivalent to Kelsey being not adventurous and Grant being depressed.
Someone is not magnificent and tense if and only if he is not excited.
If there is at least one people who is magnificent, then Odessa is tense and Kelsey is desperate. | Casper is magnificent. | entailment |
Grant is not magnificent.
Casper is excited.
Tommy is not depressed.
Grant is tense.
Mark is depressed.
Mark is not excited.
Mark is not adventurous.
Tommy is magnificent.
Casper is not depressed.
Kelsey is not tense.
Mark is not magnificent.
Tommy is adventurous.As long as someone is tense, he is magnificent and not desperate.
Mark being not adventurous implies that Casper is depressed.
If someone is not adventurous, then he is magnificent, and vice versa.
If Odessa is tense or Aedan is adventurous, then Odessa is depressed.
If there is at least one people who is both not desperate and not depressed, then Mark is magnificent.
If Mark is tense, then Grant is excited and Casper is magnificent, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not magnificent or not depressed, then Odessa is excited.
It can be concluded that Tommy is not adventurous once knowing that Tommy is excited or Kelsey is desperate.
If there is someone who is not desperate, then Mark is not adventurous and Tommy is not depressed.
Odessa being not excited is equivalent to Kelsey being not adventurous and Grant being depressed.
Someone is not magnificent and tense if and only if he is not excited.
If there is at least one people who is magnificent, then Odessa is tense and Kelsey is desperate. | Grant is not adventurous. | entailment |
Grant is not magnificent.
Casper is excited.
Tommy is not depressed.
Grant is tense.
Mark is depressed.
Mark is not excited.
Mark is not adventurous.
Tommy is magnificent.
Casper is not depressed.
Kelsey is not tense.
Mark is not magnificent.
Tommy is adventurous.As long as someone is tense, he is magnificent and not desperate.
Mark being not adventurous implies that Casper is depressed.
If someone is not adventurous, then he is magnificent, and vice versa.
If Odessa is tense or Aedan is adventurous, then Odessa is depressed.
If there is at least one people who is both not desperate and not depressed, then Mark is magnificent.
If Mark is tense, then Grant is excited and Casper is magnificent, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not magnificent or not depressed, then Odessa is excited.
It can be concluded that Tommy is not adventurous once knowing that Tommy is excited or Kelsey is desperate.
If there is someone who is not desperate, then Mark is not adventurous and Tommy is not depressed.
Odessa being not excited is equivalent to Kelsey being not adventurous and Grant being depressed.
Someone is not magnificent and tense if and only if he is not excited.
If there is at least one people who is magnificent, then Odessa is tense and Kelsey is desperate. | Mark is not magnificent. | self_contradiction |
Grant is not magnificent.
Casper is excited.
Tommy is not depressed.
Grant is tense.
Mark is depressed.
Mark is not excited.
Mark is not adventurous.
Tommy is magnificent.
Casper is not depressed.
Kelsey is not tense.
Mark is not magnificent.
Tommy is adventurous.As long as someone is tense, he is magnificent and not desperate.
Mark being not adventurous implies that Casper is depressed.
If someone is not adventurous, then he is magnificent, and vice versa.
If Odessa is tense or Aedan is adventurous, then Odessa is depressed.
If there is at least one people who is both not desperate and not depressed, then Mark is magnificent.
If Mark is tense, then Grant is excited and Casper is magnificent, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not magnificent or not depressed, then Odessa is excited.
It can be concluded that Tommy is not adventurous once knowing that Tommy is excited or Kelsey is desperate.
If there is someone who is not desperate, then Mark is not adventurous and Tommy is not depressed.
Odessa being not excited is equivalent to Kelsey being not adventurous and Grant being depressed.
Someone is not magnificent and tense if and only if he is not excited.
If there is at least one people who is magnificent, then Odessa is tense and Kelsey is desperate. | Odessa is not depressed. | contradiction |
Grant is not magnificent.
Casper is excited.
Tommy is not depressed.
Grant is tense.
Mark is depressed.
Mark is not excited.
Mark is not adventurous.
Tommy is magnificent.
Casper is not depressed.
Kelsey is not tense.
Mark is not magnificent.
Tommy is adventurous.As long as someone is tense, he is magnificent and not desperate.
Mark being not adventurous implies that Casper is depressed.
If someone is not adventurous, then he is magnificent, and vice versa.
If Odessa is tense or Aedan is adventurous, then Odessa is depressed.
If there is at least one people who is both not desperate and not depressed, then Mark is magnificent.
If Mark is tense, then Grant is excited and Casper is magnificent, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not magnificent or not depressed, then Odessa is excited.
It can be concluded that Tommy is not adventurous once knowing that Tommy is excited or Kelsey is desperate.
If there is someone who is not desperate, then Mark is not adventurous and Tommy is not depressed.
Odessa being not excited is equivalent to Kelsey being not adventurous and Grant being depressed.
Someone is not magnificent and tense if and only if he is not excited.
If there is at least one people who is magnificent, then Odessa is tense and Kelsey is desperate. | Grant is not magnificent. | self_contradiction |
Grant is not magnificent.
Casper is excited.
Tommy is not depressed.
Grant is tense.
Mark is depressed.
Mark is not excited.
Mark is not adventurous.
Tommy is magnificent.
Casper is not depressed.
Kelsey is not tense.
Mark is not magnificent.
Tommy is adventurous.As long as someone is tense, he is magnificent and not desperate.
Mark being not adventurous implies that Casper is depressed.
If someone is not adventurous, then he is magnificent, and vice versa.
If Odessa is tense or Aedan is adventurous, then Odessa is depressed.
If there is at least one people who is both not desperate and not depressed, then Mark is magnificent.
If Mark is tense, then Grant is excited and Casper is magnificent, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not magnificent or not depressed, then Odessa is excited.
It can be concluded that Tommy is not adventurous once knowing that Tommy is excited or Kelsey is desperate.
If there is someone who is not desperate, then Mark is not adventurous and Tommy is not depressed.
Odessa being not excited is equivalent to Kelsey being not adventurous and Grant being depressed.
Someone is not magnificent and tense if and only if he is not excited.
If there is at least one people who is magnificent, then Odessa is tense and Kelsey is desperate. | Kelsey is not magnificent. | neutral |
Jorge is silly.
Kim is not impressive.
Kim is cute.
Lincoln is impressive.
Lincoln is homely.
Johnny is not silly.
Igor is not impressive.
Igor is condemned.
Olin is condemned.
Kim is silly.
Hunter is not condemned.
Igor is not homely.If there is at least one people who is terrible or impressive, then Hunter is homely.
If someone is not cute, then he is condemned, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not silly or homely, then Lincoln is not impressive.
If there is someone who is not impressive, then Olin is not silly.
If there is someone who is either not terrible or condemned, then Lincoln is cute.
Olin being not homely is equivalent to Igor being not impressive.
If there is at least one people who is both not impressive and condemned, then Johnny is not terrible.
If Johnny is not impressive, then Kim is not condemned.
If someone is not silly, then he is terrible.
If there is someone who is either terrible or condemned, then Johnny is homely.
As long as someone is not silly, he is homely and terrible.
Someone who is not impressive or terrible is always not cute and homely. | Hunter is not impressive. | neutral |
Jorge is silly.
Kim is not impressive.
Kim is cute.
Lincoln is impressive.
Lincoln is homely.
Johnny is not silly.
Igor is not impressive.
Igor is condemned.
Olin is condemned.
Kim is silly.
Hunter is not condemned.
Igor is not homely.If there is at least one people who is terrible or impressive, then Hunter is homely.
If someone is not cute, then he is condemned, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not silly or homely, then Lincoln is not impressive.
If there is someone who is not impressive, then Olin is not silly.
If there is someone who is either not terrible or condemned, then Lincoln is cute.
Olin being not homely is equivalent to Igor being not impressive.
If there is at least one people who is both not impressive and condemned, then Johnny is not terrible.
If Johnny is not impressive, then Kim is not condemned.
If someone is not silly, then he is terrible.
If there is someone who is either terrible or condemned, then Johnny is homely.
As long as someone is not silly, he is homely and terrible.
Someone who is not impressive or terrible is always not cute and homely. | Lincoln is impressive. | self_contradiction |
Jorge is silly.
Kim is not impressive.
Kim is cute.
Lincoln is impressive.
Lincoln is homely.
Johnny is not silly.
Igor is not impressive.
Igor is condemned.
Olin is condemned.
Kim is silly.
Hunter is not condemned.
Igor is not homely.If there is at least one people who is terrible or impressive, then Hunter is homely.
If someone is not cute, then he is condemned, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not silly or homely, then Lincoln is not impressive.
If there is someone who is not impressive, then Olin is not silly.
If there is someone who is either not terrible or condemned, then Lincoln is cute.
Olin being not homely is equivalent to Igor being not impressive.
If there is at least one people who is both not impressive and condemned, then Johnny is not terrible.
If Johnny is not impressive, then Kim is not condemned.
If someone is not silly, then he is terrible.
If there is someone who is either terrible or condemned, then Johnny is homely.
As long as someone is not silly, he is homely and terrible.
Someone who is not impressive or terrible is always not cute and homely. | Lincoln is condemned. | entailment |
Jorge is silly.
Kim is not impressive.
Kim is cute.
Lincoln is impressive.
Lincoln is homely.
Johnny is not silly.
Igor is not impressive.
Igor is condemned.
Olin is condemned.
Kim is silly.
Hunter is not condemned.
Igor is not homely.If there is at least one people who is terrible or impressive, then Hunter is homely.
If someone is not cute, then he is condemned, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not silly or homely, then Lincoln is not impressive.
If there is someone who is not impressive, then Olin is not silly.
If there is someone who is either not terrible or condemned, then Lincoln is cute.
Olin being not homely is equivalent to Igor being not impressive.
If there is at least one people who is both not impressive and condemned, then Johnny is not terrible.
If Johnny is not impressive, then Kim is not condemned.
If someone is not silly, then he is terrible.
If there is someone who is either terrible or condemned, then Johnny is homely.
As long as someone is not silly, he is homely and terrible.
Someone who is not impressive or terrible is always not cute and homely. | Olin is silly. | contradiction |
Jorge is silly.
Kim is not impressive.
Kim is cute.
Lincoln is impressive.
Lincoln is homely.
Johnny is not silly.
Igor is not impressive.
Igor is condemned.
Olin is condemned.
Kim is silly.
Hunter is not condemned.
Igor is not homely.If there is at least one people who is terrible or impressive, then Hunter is homely.
If someone is not cute, then he is condemned, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not silly or homely, then Lincoln is not impressive.
If there is someone who is not impressive, then Olin is not silly.
If there is someone who is either not terrible or condemned, then Lincoln is cute.
Olin being not homely is equivalent to Igor being not impressive.
If there is at least one people who is both not impressive and condemned, then Johnny is not terrible.
If Johnny is not impressive, then Kim is not condemned.
If someone is not silly, then he is terrible.
If there is someone who is either terrible or condemned, then Johnny is homely.
As long as someone is not silly, he is homely and terrible.
Someone who is not impressive or terrible is always not cute and homely. | Kim is not impressive. | entailment |
Jorge is silly.
Kim is not impressive.
Kim is cute.
Lincoln is impressive.
Lincoln is homely.
Johnny is not silly.
Igor is not impressive.
Igor is condemned.
Olin is condemned.
Kim is silly.
Hunter is not condemned.
Igor is not homely.If there is at least one people who is terrible or impressive, then Hunter is homely.
If someone is not cute, then he is condemned, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not silly or homely, then Lincoln is not impressive.
If there is someone who is not impressive, then Olin is not silly.
If there is someone who is either not terrible or condemned, then Lincoln is cute.
Olin being not homely is equivalent to Igor being not impressive.
If there is at least one people who is both not impressive and condemned, then Johnny is not terrible.
If Johnny is not impressive, then Kim is not condemned.
If someone is not silly, then he is terrible.
If there is someone who is either terrible or condemned, then Johnny is homely.
As long as someone is not silly, he is homely and terrible.
Someone who is not impressive or terrible is always not cute and homely. | Igor is not cute. | entailment |
Jorge is silly.
Kim is not impressive.
Kim is cute.
Lincoln is impressive.
Lincoln is homely.
Johnny is not silly.
Igor is not impressive.
Igor is condemned.
Olin is condemned.
Kim is silly.
Hunter is not condemned.
Igor is not homely.If there is at least one people who is terrible or impressive, then Hunter is homely.
If someone is not cute, then he is condemned, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not silly or homely, then Lincoln is not impressive.
If there is someone who is not impressive, then Olin is not silly.
If there is someone who is either not terrible or condemned, then Lincoln is cute.
Olin being not homely is equivalent to Igor being not impressive.
If there is at least one people who is both not impressive and condemned, then Johnny is not terrible.
If Johnny is not impressive, then Kim is not condemned.
If someone is not silly, then he is terrible.
If there is someone who is either terrible or condemned, then Johnny is homely.
As long as someone is not silly, he is homely and terrible.
Someone who is not impressive or terrible is always not cute and homely. | Igor is homely. | self_contradiction |
Jorge is silly.
Kim is not impressive.
Kim is cute.
Lincoln is impressive.
Lincoln is homely.
Johnny is not silly.
Igor is not impressive.
Igor is condemned.
Olin is condemned.
Kim is silly.
Hunter is not condemned.
Igor is not homely.If there is at least one people who is terrible or impressive, then Hunter is homely.
If someone is not cute, then he is condemned, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not silly or homely, then Lincoln is not impressive.
If there is someone who is not impressive, then Olin is not silly.
If there is someone who is either not terrible or condemned, then Lincoln is cute.
Olin being not homely is equivalent to Igor being not impressive.
If there is at least one people who is both not impressive and condemned, then Johnny is not terrible.
If Johnny is not impressive, then Kim is not condemned.
If someone is not silly, then he is terrible.
If there is someone who is either terrible or condemned, then Johnny is homely.
As long as someone is not silly, he is homely and terrible.
Someone who is not impressive or terrible is always not cute and homely. | Igor is cute. | contradiction |
Jorge is silly.
Kim is not impressive.
Kim is cute.
Lincoln is impressive.
Lincoln is homely.
Johnny is not silly.
Igor is not impressive.
Igor is condemned.
Olin is condemned.
Kim is silly.
Hunter is not condemned.
Igor is not homely.If there is at least one people who is terrible or impressive, then Hunter is homely.
If someone is not cute, then he is condemned, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not silly or homely, then Lincoln is not impressive.
If there is someone who is not impressive, then Olin is not silly.
If there is someone who is either not terrible or condemned, then Lincoln is cute.
Olin being not homely is equivalent to Igor being not impressive.
If there is at least one people who is both not impressive and condemned, then Johnny is not terrible.
If Johnny is not impressive, then Kim is not condemned.
If someone is not silly, then he is terrible.
If there is someone who is either terrible or condemned, then Johnny is homely.
As long as someone is not silly, he is homely and terrible.
Someone who is not impressive or terrible is always not cute and homely. | Lincoln is not terrible. | neutral |
Jorge is silly.
Kim is not impressive.
Kim is cute.
Lincoln is impressive.
Lincoln is homely.
Johnny is not silly.
Igor is not impressive.
Igor is condemned.
Olin is condemned.
Kim is silly.
Hunter is not condemned.
Igor is not homely.If there is at least one people who is terrible or impressive, then Hunter is homely.
If someone is not cute, then he is condemned, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not silly or homely, then Lincoln is not impressive.
If there is someone who is not impressive, then Olin is not silly.
If there is someone who is either not terrible or condemned, then Lincoln is cute.
Olin being not homely is equivalent to Igor being not impressive.
If there is at least one people who is both not impressive and condemned, then Johnny is not terrible.
If Johnny is not impressive, then Kim is not condemned.
If someone is not silly, then he is terrible.
If there is someone who is either terrible or condemned, then Johnny is homely.
As long as someone is not silly, he is homely and terrible.
Someone who is not impressive or terrible is always not cute and homely. | Lincoln is cute. | self_contradiction |
Jorge is silly.
Kim is not impressive.
Kim is cute.
Lincoln is impressive.
Lincoln is homely.
Johnny is not silly.
Igor is not impressive.
Igor is condemned.
Olin is condemned.
Kim is silly.
Hunter is not condemned.
Igor is not homely.If there is at least one people who is terrible or impressive, then Hunter is homely.
If someone is not cute, then he is condemned, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not silly or homely, then Lincoln is not impressive.
If there is someone who is not impressive, then Olin is not silly.
If there is someone who is either not terrible or condemned, then Lincoln is cute.
Olin being not homely is equivalent to Igor being not impressive.
If there is at least one people who is both not impressive and condemned, then Johnny is not terrible.
If Johnny is not impressive, then Kim is not condemned.
If someone is not silly, then he is terrible.
If there is someone who is either terrible or condemned, then Johnny is homely.
As long as someone is not silly, he is homely and terrible.
Someone who is not impressive or terrible is always not cute and homely. | Johnny is not homely. | contradiction |
Jorge is silly.
Kim is not impressive.
Kim is cute.
Lincoln is impressive.
Lincoln is homely.
Johnny is not silly.
Igor is not impressive.
Igor is condemned.
Olin is condemned.
Kim is silly.
Hunter is not condemned.
Igor is not homely.If there is at least one people who is terrible or impressive, then Hunter is homely.
If someone is not cute, then he is condemned, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not silly or homely, then Lincoln is not impressive.
If there is someone who is not impressive, then Olin is not silly.
If there is someone who is either not terrible or condemned, then Lincoln is cute.
Olin being not homely is equivalent to Igor being not impressive.
If there is at least one people who is both not impressive and condemned, then Johnny is not terrible.
If Johnny is not impressive, then Kim is not condemned.
If someone is not silly, then he is terrible.
If there is someone who is either terrible or condemned, then Johnny is homely.
As long as someone is not silly, he is homely and terrible.
Someone who is not impressive or terrible is always not cute and homely. | Hunter is not condemned. | entailment |
Jorge is silly.
Kim is not impressive.
Kim is cute.
Lincoln is impressive.
Lincoln is homely.
Johnny is not silly.
Igor is not impressive.
Igor is condemned.
Olin is condemned.
Kim is silly.
Hunter is not condemned.
Igor is not homely.If there is at least one people who is terrible or impressive, then Hunter is homely.
If someone is not cute, then he is condemned, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not silly or homely, then Lincoln is not impressive.
If there is someone who is not impressive, then Olin is not silly.
If there is someone who is either not terrible or condemned, then Lincoln is cute.
Olin being not homely is equivalent to Igor being not impressive.
If there is at least one people who is both not impressive and condemned, then Johnny is not terrible.
If Johnny is not impressive, then Kim is not condemned.
If someone is not silly, then he is terrible.
If there is someone who is either terrible or condemned, then Johnny is homely.
As long as someone is not silly, he is homely and terrible.
Someone who is not impressive or terrible is always not cute and homely. | Jorge is not terrible. | neutral |
Jorge is silly.
Kim is not impressive.
Kim is cute.
Lincoln is impressive.
Lincoln is homely.
Johnny is not silly.
Igor is not impressive.
Igor is condemned.
Olin is condemned.
Kim is silly.
Hunter is not condemned.
Igor is not homely.If there is at least one people who is terrible or impressive, then Hunter is homely.
If someone is not cute, then he is condemned, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not silly or homely, then Lincoln is not impressive.
If there is someone who is not impressive, then Olin is not silly.
If there is someone who is either not terrible or condemned, then Lincoln is cute.
Olin being not homely is equivalent to Igor being not impressive.
If there is at least one people who is both not impressive and condemned, then Johnny is not terrible.
If Johnny is not impressive, then Kim is not condemned.
If someone is not silly, then he is terrible.
If there is someone who is either terrible or condemned, then Johnny is homely.
As long as someone is not silly, he is homely and terrible.
Someone who is not impressive or terrible is always not cute and homely. | Hunter is condemned. | contradiction |
Jorge is silly.
Kim is not impressive.
Kim is cute.
Lincoln is impressive.
Lincoln is homely.
Johnny is not silly.
Igor is not impressive.
Igor is condemned.
Olin is condemned.
Kim is silly.
Hunter is not condemned.
Igor is not homely.If there is at least one people who is terrible or impressive, then Hunter is homely.
If someone is not cute, then he is condemned, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not silly or homely, then Lincoln is not impressive.
If there is someone who is not impressive, then Olin is not silly.
If there is someone who is either not terrible or condemned, then Lincoln is cute.
Olin being not homely is equivalent to Igor being not impressive.
If there is at least one people who is both not impressive and condemned, then Johnny is not terrible.
If Johnny is not impressive, then Kim is not condemned.
If someone is not silly, then he is terrible.
If there is someone who is either terrible or condemned, then Johnny is homely.
As long as someone is not silly, he is homely and terrible.
Someone who is not impressive or terrible is always not cute and homely. | Hunter is not cute. | neutral |
Jorge is silly.
Kim is not impressive.
Kim is cute.
Lincoln is impressive.
Lincoln is homely.
Johnny is not silly.
Igor is not impressive.
Igor is condemned.
Olin is condemned.
Kim is silly.
Hunter is not condemned.
Igor is not homely.If there is at least one people who is terrible or impressive, then Hunter is homely.
If someone is not cute, then he is condemned, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not silly or homely, then Lincoln is not impressive.
If there is someone who is not impressive, then Olin is not silly.
If there is someone who is either not terrible or condemned, then Lincoln is cute.
Olin being not homely is equivalent to Igor being not impressive.
If there is at least one people who is both not impressive and condemned, then Johnny is not terrible.
If Johnny is not impressive, then Kim is not condemned.
If someone is not silly, then he is terrible.
If there is someone who is either terrible or condemned, then Johnny is homely.
As long as someone is not silly, he is homely and terrible.
Someone who is not impressive or terrible is always not cute and homely. | Igor is impressive. | contradiction |
Jorge is silly.
Kim is not impressive.
Kim is cute.
Lincoln is impressive.
Lincoln is homely.
Johnny is not silly.
Igor is not impressive.
Igor is condemned.
Olin is condemned.
Kim is silly.
Hunter is not condemned.
Igor is not homely.If there is at least one people who is terrible or impressive, then Hunter is homely.
If someone is not cute, then he is condemned, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not silly or homely, then Lincoln is not impressive.
If there is someone who is not impressive, then Olin is not silly.
If there is someone who is either not terrible or condemned, then Lincoln is cute.
Olin being not homely is equivalent to Igor being not impressive.
If there is at least one people who is both not impressive and condemned, then Johnny is not terrible.
If Johnny is not impressive, then Kim is not condemned.
If someone is not silly, then he is terrible.
If there is someone who is either terrible or condemned, then Johnny is homely.
As long as someone is not silly, he is homely and terrible.
Someone who is not impressive or terrible is always not cute and homely. | Olin is not impressive. | neutral |
Jorge is silly.
Kim is not impressive.
Kim is cute.
Lincoln is impressive.
Lincoln is homely.
Johnny is not silly.
Igor is not impressive.
Igor is condemned.
Olin is condemned.
Kim is silly.
Hunter is not condemned.
Igor is not homely.If there is at least one people who is terrible or impressive, then Hunter is homely.
If someone is not cute, then he is condemned, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not silly or homely, then Lincoln is not impressive.
If there is someone who is not impressive, then Olin is not silly.
If there is someone who is either not terrible or condemned, then Lincoln is cute.
Olin being not homely is equivalent to Igor being not impressive.
If there is at least one people who is both not impressive and condemned, then Johnny is not terrible.
If Johnny is not impressive, then Kim is not condemned.
If someone is not silly, then he is terrible.
If there is someone who is either terrible or condemned, then Johnny is homely.
As long as someone is not silly, he is homely and terrible.
Someone who is not impressive or terrible is always not cute and homely. | Jorge is silly. | entailment |
Jorge is silly.
Kim is not impressive.
Kim is cute.
Lincoln is impressive.
Lincoln is homely.
Johnny is not silly.
Igor is not impressive.
Igor is condemned.
Olin is condemned.
Kim is silly.
Hunter is not condemned.
Igor is not homely.If there is at least one people who is terrible or impressive, then Hunter is homely.
If someone is not cute, then he is condemned, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not silly or homely, then Lincoln is not impressive.
If there is someone who is not impressive, then Olin is not silly.
If there is someone who is either not terrible or condemned, then Lincoln is cute.
Olin being not homely is equivalent to Igor being not impressive.
If there is at least one people who is both not impressive and condemned, then Johnny is not terrible.
If Johnny is not impressive, then Kim is not condemned.
If someone is not silly, then he is terrible.
If there is someone who is either terrible or condemned, then Johnny is homely.
As long as someone is not silly, he is homely and terrible.
Someone who is not impressive or terrible is always not cute and homely. | Lincoln is not cute. | self_contradiction |
Jorge is silly.
Kim is not impressive.
Kim is cute.
Lincoln is impressive.
Lincoln is homely.
Johnny is not silly.
Igor is not impressive.
Igor is condemned.
Olin is condemned.
Kim is silly.
Hunter is not condemned.
Igor is not homely.If there is at least one people who is terrible or impressive, then Hunter is homely.
If someone is not cute, then he is condemned, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not silly or homely, then Lincoln is not impressive.
If there is someone who is not impressive, then Olin is not silly.
If there is someone who is either not terrible or condemned, then Lincoln is cute.
Olin being not homely is equivalent to Igor being not impressive.
If there is at least one people who is both not impressive and condemned, then Johnny is not terrible.
If Johnny is not impressive, then Kim is not condemned.
If someone is not silly, then he is terrible.
If there is someone who is either terrible or condemned, then Johnny is homely.
As long as someone is not silly, he is homely and terrible.
Someone who is not impressive or terrible is always not cute and homely. | Kim is not cute. | self_contradiction |
Sherlock is red.
Kimball is federal.
Chandler is not federal.
Sherlock is not federal.
Addison is not thankful.
Chandler is not thankful.
Kane is not red.
Kane is not helpful.
Addison is red.
Anabelle is thankful.
Sherlock is not helpful.
Anabelle is not federal.Anabelle is not naughty if and only if Ian is not federal.
Someone is not gentle if and only if he is not helpful.
Someone being both helpful and naughty is equivalent to being federal and not gentle.
Someone who is eithor red or helpful is always not thankful.
If someone is federal, then he is not thankful, and vice versa.
Addison being not red implies that Anabelle is not helpful.
If Sherlock is thankful or Ian is naughty, then Anabelle is gentle.
If there is at least one people who is helpful or not gentle, then Ian is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is helpful, then Addison is federal.
If there is someone who is either not federal or naughty, then Chandler is not helpful.
If there is someone who is either federal or not red, then Chandler is not thankful.
All federal people are not gentle. | Chandler is helpful. | self_contradiction |
Sherlock is red.
Kimball is federal.
Chandler is not federal.
Sherlock is not federal.
Addison is not thankful.
Chandler is not thankful.
Kane is not red.
Kane is not helpful.
Addison is red.
Anabelle is thankful.
Sherlock is not helpful.
Anabelle is not federal.Anabelle is not naughty if and only if Ian is not federal.
Someone is not gentle if and only if he is not helpful.
Someone being both helpful and naughty is equivalent to being federal and not gentle.
Someone who is eithor red or helpful is always not thankful.
If someone is federal, then he is not thankful, and vice versa.
Addison being not red implies that Anabelle is not helpful.
If Sherlock is thankful or Ian is naughty, then Anabelle is gentle.
If there is at least one people who is helpful or not gentle, then Ian is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is helpful, then Addison is federal.
If there is someone who is either not federal or naughty, then Chandler is not helpful.
If there is someone who is either federal or not red, then Chandler is not thankful.
All federal people are not gentle. | Kimball is red. | neutral |
Sherlock is red.
Kimball is federal.
Chandler is not federal.
Sherlock is not federal.
Addison is not thankful.
Chandler is not thankful.
Kane is not red.
Kane is not helpful.
Addison is red.
Anabelle is thankful.
Sherlock is not helpful.
Anabelle is not federal.Anabelle is not naughty if and only if Ian is not federal.
Someone is not gentle if and only if he is not helpful.
Someone being both helpful and naughty is equivalent to being federal and not gentle.
Someone who is eithor red or helpful is always not thankful.
If someone is federal, then he is not thankful, and vice versa.
Addison being not red implies that Anabelle is not helpful.
If Sherlock is thankful or Ian is naughty, then Anabelle is gentle.
If there is at least one people who is helpful or not gentle, then Ian is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is helpful, then Addison is federal.
If there is someone who is either not federal or naughty, then Chandler is not helpful.
If there is someone who is either federal or not red, then Chandler is not thankful.
All federal people are not gentle. | Chandler is gentle. | contradiction |
Sherlock is red.
Kimball is federal.
Chandler is not federal.
Sherlock is not federal.
Addison is not thankful.
Chandler is not thankful.
Kane is not red.
Kane is not helpful.
Addison is red.
Anabelle is thankful.
Sherlock is not helpful.
Anabelle is not federal.Anabelle is not naughty if and only if Ian is not federal.
Someone is not gentle if and only if he is not helpful.
Someone being both helpful and naughty is equivalent to being federal and not gentle.
Someone who is eithor red or helpful is always not thankful.
If someone is federal, then he is not thankful, and vice versa.
Addison being not red implies that Anabelle is not helpful.
If Sherlock is thankful or Ian is naughty, then Anabelle is gentle.
If there is at least one people who is helpful or not gentle, then Ian is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is helpful, then Addison is federal.
If there is someone who is either not federal or naughty, then Chandler is not helpful.
If there is someone who is either federal or not red, then Chandler is not thankful.
All federal people are not gentle. | Chandler is not federal. | self_contradiction |
Sherlock is red.
Kimball is federal.
Chandler is not federal.
Sherlock is not federal.
Addison is not thankful.
Chandler is not thankful.
Kane is not red.
Kane is not helpful.
Addison is red.
Anabelle is thankful.
Sherlock is not helpful.
Anabelle is not federal.Anabelle is not naughty if and only if Ian is not federal.
Someone is not gentle if and only if he is not helpful.
Someone being both helpful and naughty is equivalent to being federal and not gentle.
Someone who is eithor red or helpful is always not thankful.
If someone is federal, then he is not thankful, and vice versa.
Addison being not red implies that Anabelle is not helpful.
If Sherlock is thankful or Ian is naughty, then Anabelle is gentle.
If there is at least one people who is helpful or not gentle, then Ian is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is helpful, then Addison is federal.
If there is someone who is either not federal or naughty, then Chandler is not helpful.
If there is someone who is either federal or not red, then Chandler is not thankful.
All federal people are not gentle. | Ian is helpful. | neutral |
Sherlock is red.
Kimball is federal.
Chandler is not federal.
Sherlock is not federal.
Addison is not thankful.
Chandler is not thankful.
Kane is not red.
Kane is not helpful.
Addison is red.
Anabelle is thankful.
Sherlock is not helpful.
Anabelle is not federal.Anabelle is not naughty if and only if Ian is not federal.
Someone is not gentle if and only if he is not helpful.
Someone being both helpful and naughty is equivalent to being federal and not gentle.
Someone who is eithor red or helpful is always not thankful.
If someone is federal, then he is not thankful, and vice versa.
Addison being not red implies that Anabelle is not helpful.
If Sherlock is thankful or Ian is naughty, then Anabelle is gentle.
If there is at least one people who is helpful or not gentle, then Ian is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is helpful, then Addison is federal.
If there is someone who is either not federal or naughty, then Chandler is not helpful.
If there is someone who is either federal or not red, then Chandler is not thankful.
All federal people are not gentle. | Sherlock is naughty. | entailment |
Sherlock is red.
Kimball is federal.
Chandler is not federal.
Sherlock is not federal.
Addison is not thankful.
Chandler is not thankful.
Kane is not red.
Kane is not helpful.
Addison is red.
Anabelle is thankful.
Sherlock is not helpful.
Anabelle is not federal.Anabelle is not naughty if and only if Ian is not federal.
Someone is not gentle if and only if he is not helpful.
Someone being both helpful and naughty is equivalent to being federal and not gentle.
Someone who is eithor red or helpful is always not thankful.
If someone is federal, then he is not thankful, and vice versa.
Addison being not red implies that Anabelle is not helpful.
If Sherlock is thankful or Ian is naughty, then Anabelle is gentle.
If there is at least one people who is helpful or not gentle, then Ian is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is helpful, then Addison is federal.
If there is someone who is either not federal or naughty, then Chandler is not helpful.
If there is someone who is either federal or not red, then Chandler is not thankful.
All federal people are not gentle. | Anabelle is red. | neutral |
Sherlock is red.
Kimball is federal.
Chandler is not federal.
Sherlock is not federal.
Addison is not thankful.
Chandler is not thankful.
Kane is not red.
Kane is not helpful.
Addison is red.
Anabelle is thankful.
Sherlock is not helpful.
Anabelle is not federal.Anabelle is not naughty if and only if Ian is not federal.
Someone is not gentle if and only if he is not helpful.
Someone being both helpful and naughty is equivalent to being federal and not gentle.
Someone who is eithor red or helpful is always not thankful.
If someone is federal, then he is not thankful, and vice versa.
Addison being not red implies that Anabelle is not helpful.
If Sherlock is thankful or Ian is naughty, then Anabelle is gentle.
If there is at least one people who is helpful or not gentle, then Ian is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is helpful, then Addison is federal.
If there is someone who is either not federal or naughty, then Chandler is not helpful.
If there is someone who is either federal or not red, then Chandler is not thankful.
All federal people are not gentle. | Sherlock is federal. | self_contradiction |
Sherlock is red.
Kimball is federal.
Chandler is not federal.
Sherlock is not federal.
Addison is not thankful.
Chandler is not thankful.
Kane is not red.
Kane is not helpful.
Addison is red.
Anabelle is thankful.
Sherlock is not helpful.
Anabelle is not federal.Anabelle is not naughty if and only if Ian is not federal.
Someone is not gentle if and only if he is not helpful.
Someone being both helpful and naughty is equivalent to being federal and not gentle.
Someone who is eithor red or helpful is always not thankful.
If someone is federal, then he is not thankful, and vice versa.
Addison being not red implies that Anabelle is not helpful.
If Sherlock is thankful or Ian is naughty, then Anabelle is gentle.
If there is at least one people who is helpful or not gentle, then Ian is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is helpful, then Addison is federal.
If there is someone who is either not federal or naughty, then Chandler is not helpful.
If there is someone who is either federal or not red, then Chandler is not thankful.
All federal people are not gentle. | Kane is naughty. | neutral |
Sherlock is red.
Kimball is federal.
Chandler is not federal.
Sherlock is not federal.
Addison is not thankful.
Chandler is not thankful.
Kane is not red.
Kane is not helpful.
Addison is red.
Anabelle is thankful.
Sherlock is not helpful.
Anabelle is not federal.Anabelle is not naughty if and only if Ian is not federal.
Someone is not gentle if and only if he is not helpful.
Someone being both helpful and naughty is equivalent to being federal and not gentle.
Someone who is eithor red or helpful is always not thankful.
If someone is federal, then he is not thankful, and vice versa.
Addison being not red implies that Anabelle is not helpful.
If Sherlock is thankful or Ian is naughty, then Anabelle is gentle.
If there is at least one people who is helpful or not gentle, then Ian is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is helpful, then Addison is federal.
If there is someone who is either not federal or naughty, then Chandler is not helpful.
If there is someone who is either federal or not red, then Chandler is not thankful.
All federal people are not gentle. | Chandler is naughty. | entailment |
Sherlock is red.
Kimball is federal.
Chandler is not federal.
Sherlock is not federal.
Addison is not thankful.
Chandler is not thankful.
Kane is not red.
Kane is not helpful.
Addison is red.
Anabelle is thankful.
Sherlock is not helpful.
Anabelle is not federal.Anabelle is not naughty if and only if Ian is not federal.
Someone is not gentle if and only if he is not helpful.
Someone being both helpful and naughty is equivalent to being federal and not gentle.
Someone who is eithor red or helpful is always not thankful.
If someone is federal, then he is not thankful, and vice versa.
Addison being not red implies that Anabelle is not helpful.
If Sherlock is thankful or Ian is naughty, then Anabelle is gentle.
If there is at least one people who is helpful or not gentle, then Ian is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is helpful, then Addison is federal.
If there is someone who is either not federal or naughty, then Chandler is not helpful.
If there is someone who is either federal or not red, then Chandler is not thankful.
All federal people are not gentle. | Sherlock is thankful. | contradiction |
Sherlock is red.
Kimball is federal.
Chandler is not federal.
Sherlock is not federal.
Addison is not thankful.
Chandler is not thankful.
Kane is not red.
Kane is not helpful.
Addison is red.
Anabelle is thankful.
Sherlock is not helpful.
Anabelle is not federal.Anabelle is not naughty if and only if Ian is not federal.
Someone is not gentle if and only if he is not helpful.
Someone being both helpful and naughty is equivalent to being federal and not gentle.
Someone who is eithor red or helpful is always not thankful.
If someone is federal, then he is not thankful, and vice versa.
Addison being not red implies that Anabelle is not helpful.
If Sherlock is thankful or Ian is naughty, then Anabelle is gentle.
If there is at least one people who is helpful or not gentle, then Ian is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is helpful, then Addison is federal.
If there is someone who is either not federal or naughty, then Chandler is not helpful.
If there is someone who is either federal or not red, then Chandler is not thankful.
All federal people are not gentle. | Kimball is not naughty. | contradiction |
Sherlock is red.
Kimball is federal.
Chandler is not federal.
Sherlock is not federal.
Addison is not thankful.
Chandler is not thankful.
Kane is not red.
Kane is not helpful.
Addison is red.
Anabelle is thankful.
Sherlock is not helpful.
Anabelle is not federal.Anabelle is not naughty if and only if Ian is not federal.
Someone is not gentle if and only if he is not helpful.
Someone being both helpful and naughty is equivalent to being federal and not gentle.
Someone who is eithor red or helpful is always not thankful.
If someone is federal, then he is not thankful, and vice versa.
Addison being not red implies that Anabelle is not helpful.
If Sherlock is thankful or Ian is naughty, then Anabelle is gentle.
If there is at least one people who is helpful or not gentle, then Ian is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is helpful, then Addison is federal.
If there is someone who is either not federal or naughty, then Chandler is not helpful.
If there is someone who is either federal or not red, then Chandler is not thankful.
All federal people are not gentle. | Anabelle is not thankful. | contradiction |
Sherlock is red.
Kimball is federal.
Chandler is not federal.
Sherlock is not federal.
Addison is not thankful.
Chandler is not thankful.
Kane is not red.
Kane is not helpful.
Addison is red.
Anabelle is thankful.
Sherlock is not helpful.
Anabelle is not federal.Anabelle is not naughty if and only if Ian is not federal.
Someone is not gentle if and only if he is not helpful.
Someone being both helpful and naughty is equivalent to being federal and not gentle.
Someone who is eithor red or helpful is always not thankful.
If someone is federal, then he is not thankful, and vice versa.
Addison being not red implies that Anabelle is not helpful.
If Sherlock is thankful or Ian is naughty, then Anabelle is gentle.
If there is at least one people who is helpful or not gentle, then Ian is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is helpful, then Addison is federal.
If there is someone who is either not federal or naughty, then Chandler is not helpful.
If there is someone who is either federal or not red, then Chandler is not thankful.
All federal people are not gentle. | Chandler is not thankful. | entailment |
Sherlock is red.
Kimball is federal.
Chandler is not federal.
Sherlock is not federal.
Addison is not thankful.
Chandler is not thankful.
Kane is not red.
Kane is not helpful.
Addison is red.
Anabelle is thankful.
Sherlock is not helpful.
Anabelle is not federal.Anabelle is not naughty if and only if Ian is not federal.
Someone is not gentle if and only if he is not helpful.
Someone being both helpful and naughty is equivalent to being federal and not gentle.
Someone who is eithor red or helpful is always not thankful.
If someone is federal, then he is not thankful, and vice versa.
Addison being not red implies that Anabelle is not helpful.
If Sherlock is thankful or Ian is naughty, then Anabelle is gentle.
If there is at least one people who is helpful or not gentle, then Ian is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is helpful, then Addison is federal.
If there is someone who is either not federal or naughty, then Chandler is not helpful.
If there is someone who is either federal or not red, then Chandler is not thankful.
All federal people are not gentle. | Kimball is not gentle. | entailment |
Sherlock is red.
Kimball is federal.
Chandler is not federal.
Sherlock is not federal.
Addison is not thankful.
Chandler is not thankful.
Kane is not red.
Kane is not helpful.
Addison is red.
Anabelle is thankful.
Sherlock is not helpful.
Anabelle is not federal.Anabelle is not naughty if and only if Ian is not federal.
Someone is not gentle if and only if he is not helpful.
Someone being both helpful and naughty is equivalent to being federal and not gentle.
Someone who is eithor red or helpful is always not thankful.
If someone is federal, then he is not thankful, and vice versa.
Addison being not red implies that Anabelle is not helpful.
If Sherlock is thankful or Ian is naughty, then Anabelle is gentle.
If there is at least one people who is helpful or not gentle, then Ian is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is helpful, then Addison is federal.
If there is someone who is either not federal or naughty, then Chandler is not helpful.
If there is someone who is either federal or not red, then Chandler is not thankful.
All federal people are not gentle. | Ian is gentle. | neutral |
Sherlock is red.
Kimball is federal.
Chandler is not federal.
Sherlock is not federal.
Addison is not thankful.
Chandler is not thankful.
Kane is not red.
Kane is not helpful.
Addison is red.
Anabelle is thankful.
Sherlock is not helpful.
Anabelle is not federal.Anabelle is not naughty if and only if Ian is not federal.
Someone is not gentle if and only if he is not helpful.
Someone being both helpful and naughty is equivalent to being federal and not gentle.
Someone who is eithor red or helpful is always not thankful.
If someone is federal, then he is not thankful, and vice versa.
Addison being not red implies that Anabelle is not helpful.
If Sherlock is thankful or Ian is naughty, then Anabelle is gentle.
If there is at least one people who is helpful or not gentle, then Ian is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is helpful, then Addison is federal.
If there is someone who is either not federal or naughty, then Chandler is not helpful.
If there is someone who is either federal or not red, then Chandler is not thankful.
All federal people are not gentle. | Kimball is not helpful. | self_contradiction |
Sherlock is red.
Kimball is federal.
Chandler is not federal.
Sherlock is not federal.
Addison is not thankful.
Chandler is not thankful.
Kane is not red.
Kane is not helpful.
Addison is red.
Anabelle is thankful.
Sherlock is not helpful.
Anabelle is not federal.Anabelle is not naughty if and only if Ian is not federal.
Someone is not gentle if and only if he is not helpful.
Someone being both helpful and naughty is equivalent to being federal and not gentle.
Someone who is eithor red or helpful is always not thankful.
If someone is federal, then he is not thankful, and vice versa.
Addison being not red implies that Anabelle is not helpful.
If Sherlock is thankful or Ian is naughty, then Anabelle is gentle.
If there is at least one people who is helpful or not gentle, then Ian is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is helpful, then Addison is federal.
If there is someone who is either not federal or naughty, then Chandler is not helpful.
If there is someone who is either federal or not red, then Chandler is not thankful.
All federal people are not gentle. | Kane is not gentle. | entailment |
Sherlock is red.
Kimball is federal.
Chandler is not federal.
Sherlock is not federal.
Addison is not thankful.
Chandler is not thankful.
Kane is not red.
Kane is not helpful.
Addison is red.
Anabelle is thankful.
Sherlock is not helpful.
Anabelle is not federal.Anabelle is not naughty if and only if Ian is not federal.
Someone is not gentle if and only if he is not helpful.
Someone being both helpful and naughty is equivalent to being federal and not gentle.
Someone who is eithor red or helpful is always not thankful.
If someone is federal, then he is not thankful, and vice versa.
Addison being not red implies that Anabelle is not helpful.
If Sherlock is thankful or Ian is naughty, then Anabelle is gentle.
If there is at least one people who is helpful or not gentle, then Ian is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is helpful, then Addison is federal.
If there is someone who is either not federal or naughty, then Chandler is not helpful.
If there is someone who is either federal or not red, then Chandler is not thankful.
All federal people are not gentle. | Sherlock is not naughty. | contradiction |
Sherlock is red.
Kimball is federal.
Chandler is not federal.
Sherlock is not federal.
Addison is not thankful.
Chandler is not thankful.
Kane is not red.
Kane is not helpful.
Addison is red.
Anabelle is thankful.
Sherlock is not helpful.
Anabelle is not federal.Anabelle is not naughty if and only if Ian is not federal.
Someone is not gentle if and only if he is not helpful.
Someone being both helpful and naughty is equivalent to being federal and not gentle.
Someone who is eithor red or helpful is always not thankful.
If someone is federal, then he is not thankful, and vice versa.
Addison being not red implies that Anabelle is not helpful.
If Sherlock is thankful or Ian is naughty, then Anabelle is gentle.
If there is at least one people who is helpful or not gentle, then Ian is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is helpful, then Addison is federal.
If there is someone who is either not federal or naughty, then Chandler is not helpful.
If there is someone who is either federal or not red, then Chandler is not thankful.
All federal people are not gentle. | Kimball is helpful. | self_contradiction |
Caldwell is not chestnut.
Paxton is weary.
Chester is not disobedient.
Douglas is thoughtful.
Paxton is not disobedient.
Graham is weary.
Hadwin is confident.
Hadwin is chestnut.
Hadwin is not disobedient.
Paxton is massive.
Graham is not disobedient.
Caldwell is confident.All massive people are not confident.
If there is at least one people who is both chestnut and not massive, then Douglas is not disobedient.
If there is someone who is not disobedient, then Hadwin is weary.
If someone is weary or he is not confident, then he is disobedient.
It can be concluded that Caldwell is massive once knowing that Chester is not confident.
If Douglas is not thoughtful, then Gilbert is not weary and Paxton is massive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not chestnut, then Hadwin is not thoughtful.
If someone is not disobedient or not weary, then he is not thoughtful.
If Graham is not weary, then Chester is thoughtful, and vice versa.
Paxton being disobedient implies that Caldwell is not confident and Graham is massive.
If someone who is confident is also weary, then he is massive.
Someone is confident and not thoughtful if and only if he is not chestnut. | Paxton is massive. | entailment |
Caldwell is not chestnut.
Paxton is weary.
Chester is not disobedient.
Douglas is thoughtful.
Paxton is not disobedient.
Graham is weary.
Hadwin is confident.
Hadwin is chestnut.
Hadwin is not disobedient.
Paxton is massive.
Graham is not disobedient.
Caldwell is confident.All massive people are not confident.
If there is at least one people who is both chestnut and not massive, then Douglas is not disobedient.
If there is someone who is not disobedient, then Hadwin is weary.
If someone is weary or he is not confident, then he is disobedient.
It can be concluded that Caldwell is massive once knowing that Chester is not confident.
If Douglas is not thoughtful, then Gilbert is not weary and Paxton is massive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not chestnut, then Hadwin is not thoughtful.
If someone is not disobedient or not weary, then he is not thoughtful.
If Graham is not weary, then Chester is thoughtful, and vice versa.
Paxton being disobedient implies that Caldwell is not confident and Graham is massive.
If someone who is confident is also weary, then he is massive.
Someone is confident and not thoughtful if and only if he is not chestnut. | Gilbert is disobedient. | neutral |
Caldwell is not chestnut.
Paxton is weary.
Chester is not disobedient.
Douglas is thoughtful.
Paxton is not disobedient.
Graham is weary.
Hadwin is confident.
Hadwin is chestnut.
Hadwin is not disobedient.
Paxton is massive.
Graham is not disobedient.
Caldwell is confident.All massive people are not confident.
If there is at least one people who is both chestnut and not massive, then Douglas is not disobedient.
If there is someone who is not disobedient, then Hadwin is weary.
If someone is weary or he is not confident, then he is disobedient.
It can be concluded that Caldwell is massive once knowing that Chester is not confident.
If Douglas is not thoughtful, then Gilbert is not weary and Paxton is massive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not chestnut, then Hadwin is not thoughtful.
If someone is not disobedient or not weary, then he is not thoughtful.
If Graham is not weary, then Chester is thoughtful, and vice versa.
Paxton being disobedient implies that Caldwell is not confident and Graham is massive.
If someone who is confident is also weary, then he is massive.
Someone is confident and not thoughtful if and only if he is not chestnut. | Hadwin is not weary. | contradiction |
Caldwell is not chestnut.
Paxton is weary.
Chester is not disobedient.
Douglas is thoughtful.
Paxton is not disobedient.
Graham is weary.
Hadwin is confident.
Hadwin is chestnut.
Hadwin is not disobedient.
Paxton is massive.
Graham is not disobedient.
Caldwell is confident.All massive people are not confident.
If there is at least one people who is both chestnut and not massive, then Douglas is not disobedient.
If there is someone who is not disobedient, then Hadwin is weary.
If someone is weary or he is not confident, then he is disobedient.
It can be concluded that Caldwell is massive once knowing that Chester is not confident.
If Douglas is not thoughtful, then Gilbert is not weary and Paxton is massive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not chestnut, then Hadwin is not thoughtful.
If someone is not disobedient or not weary, then he is not thoughtful.
If Graham is not weary, then Chester is thoughtful, and vice versa.
Paxton being disobedient implies that Caldwell is not confident and Graham is massive.
If someone who is confident is also weary, then he is massive.
Someone is confident and not thoughtful if and only if he is not chestnut. | Paxton is weary. | entailment |
Caldwell is not chestnut.
Paxton is weary.
Chester is not disobedient.
Douglas is thoughtful.
Paxton is not disobedient.
Graham is weary.
Hadwin is confident.
Hadwin is chestnut.
Hadwin is not disobedient.
Paxton is massive.
Graham is not disobedient.
Caldwell is confident.All massive people are not confident.
If there is at least one people who is both chestnut and not massive, then Douglas is not disobedient.
If there is someone who is not disobedient, then Hadwin is weary.
If someone is weary or he is not confident, then he is disobedient.
It can be concluded that Caldwell is massive once knowing that Chester is not confident.
If Douglas is not thoughtful, then Gilbert is not weary and Paxton is massive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not chestnut, then Hadwin is not thoughtful.
If someone is not disobedient or not weary, then he is not thoughtful.
If Graham is not weary, then Chester is thoughtful, and vice versa.
Paxton being disobedient implies that Caldwell is not confident and Graham is massive.
If someone who is confident is also weary, then he is massive.
Someone is confident and not thoughtful if and only if he is not chestnut. | Caldwell is confident. | self_contradiction |
Caldwell is not chestnut.
Paxton is weary.
Chester is not disobedient.
Douglas is thoughtful.
Paxton is not disobedient.
Graham is weary.
Hadwin is confident.
Hadwin is chestnut.
Hadwin is not disobedient.
Paxton is massive.
Graham is not disobedient.
Caldwell is confident.All massive people are not confident.
If there is at least one people who is both chestnut and not massive, then Douglas is not disobedient.
If there is someone who is not disobedient, then Hadwin is weary.
If someone is weary or he is not confident, then he is disobedient.
It can be concluded that Caldwell is massive once knowing that Chester is not confident.
If Douglas is not thoughtful, then Gilbert is not weary and Paxton is massive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not chestnut, then Hadwin is not thoughtful.
If someone is not disobedient or not weary, then he is not thoughtful.
If Graham is not weary, then Chester is thoughtful, and vice versa.
Paxton being disobedient implies that Caldwell is not confident and Graham is massive.
If someone who is confident is also weary, then he is massive.
Someone is confident and not thoughtful if and only if he is not chestnut. | Hadwin is massive. | entailment |
Caldwell is not chestnut.
Paxton is weary.
Chester is not disobedient.
Douglas is thoughtful.
Paxton is not disobedient.
Graham is weary.
Hadwin is confident.
Hadwin is chestnut.
Hadwin is not disobedient.
Paxton is massive.
Graham is not disobedient.
Caldwell is confident.All massive people are not confident.
If there is at least one people who is both chestnut and not massive, then Douglas is not disobedient.
If there is someone who is not disobedient, then Hadwin is weary.
If someone is weary or he is not confident, then he is disobedient.
It can be concluded that Caldwell is massive once knowing that Chester is not confident.
If Douglas is not thoughtful, then Gilbert is not weary and Paxton is massive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not chestnut, then Hadwin is not thoughtful.
If someone is not disobedient or not weary, then he is not thoughtful.
If Graham is not weary, then Chester is thoughtful, and vice versa.
Paxton being disobedient implies that Caldwell is not confident and Graham is massive.
If someone who is confident is also weary, then he is massive.
Someone is confident and not thoughtful if and only if he is not chestnut. | Hadwin is not thoughtful. | entailment |
Caldwell is not chestnut.
Paxton is weary.
Chester is not disobedient.
Douglas is thoughtful.
Paxton is not disobedient.
Graham is weary.
Hadwin is confident.
Hadwin is chestnut.
Hadwin is not disobedient.
Paxton is massive.
Graham is not disobedient.
Caldwell is confident.All massive people are not confident.
If there is at least one people who is both chestnut and not massive, then Douglas is not disobedient.
If there is someone who is not disobedient, then Hadwin is weary.
If someone is weary or he is not confident, then he is disobedient.
It can be concluded that Caldwell is massive once knowing that Chester is not confident.
If Douglas is not thoughtful, then Gilbert is not weary and Paxton is massive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not chestnut, then Hadwin is not thoughtful.
If someone is not disobedient or not weary, then he is not thoughtful.
If Graham is not weary, then Chester is thoughtful, and vice versa.
Paxton being disobedient implies that Caldwell is not confident and Graham is massive.
If someone who is confident is also weary, then he is massive.
Someone is confident and not thoughtful if and only if he is not chestnut. | Hadwin is thoughtful. | contradiction |
Caldwell is not chestnut.
Paxton is weary.
Chester is not disobedient.
Douglas is thoughtful.
Paxton is not disobedient.
Graham is weary.
Hadwin is confident.
Hadwin is chestnut.
Hadwin is not disobedient.
Paxton is massive.
Graham is not disobedient.
Caldwell is confident.All massive people are not confident.
If there is at least one people who is both chestnut and not massive, then Douglas is not disobedient.
If there is someone who is not disobedient, then Hadwin is weary.
If someone is weary or he is not confident, then he is disobedient.
It can be concluded that Caldwell is massive once knowing that Chester is not confident.
If Douglas is not thoughtful, then Gilbert is not weary and Paxton is massive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not chestnut, then Hadwin is not thoughtful.
If someone is not disobedient or not weary, then he is not thoughtful.
If Graham is not weary, then Chester is thoughtful, and vice versa.
Paxton being disobedient implies that Caldwell is not confident and Graham is massive.
If someone who is confident is also weary, then he is massive.
Someone is confident and not thoughtful if and only if he is not chestnut. | Hadwin is not disobedient. | self_contradiction |
Caldwell is not chestnut.
Paxton is weary.
Chester is not disobedient.
Douglas is thoughtful.
Paxton is not disobedient.
Graham is weary.
Hadwin is confident.
Hadwin is chestnut.
Hadwin is not disobedient.
Paxton is massive.
Graham is not disobedient.
Caldwell is confident.All massive people are not confident.
If there is at least one people who is both chestnut and not massive, then Douglas is not disobedient.
If there is someone who is not disobedient, then Hadwin is weary.
If someone is weary or he is not confident, then he is disobedient.
It can be concluded that Caldwell is massive once knowing that Chester is not confident.
If Douglas is not thoughtful, then Gilbert is not weary and Paxton is massive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not chestnut, then Hadwin is not thoughtful.
If someone is not disobedient or not weary, then he is not thoughtful.
If Graham is not weary, then Chester is thoughtful, and vice versa.
Paxton being disobedient implies that Caldwell is not confident and Graham is massive.
If someone who is confident is also weary, then he is massive.
Someone is confident and not thoughtful if and only if he is not chestnut. | Hadwin is not chestnut. | self_contradiction |
Caldwell is not chestnut.
Paxton is weary.
Chester is not disobedient.
Douglas is thoughtful.
Paxton is not disobedient.
Graham is weary.
Hadwin is confident.
Hadwin is chestnut.
Hadwin is not disobedient.
Paxton is massive.
Graham is not disobedient.
Caldwell is confident.All massive people are not confident.
If there is at least one people who is both chestnut and not massive, then Douglas is not disobedient.
If there is someone who is not disobedient, then Hadwin is weary.
If someone is weary or he is not confident, then he is disobedient.
It can be concluded that Caldwell is massive once knowing that Chester is not confident.
If Douglas is not thoughtful, then Gilbert is not weary and Paxton is massive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not chestnut, then Hadwin is not thoughtful.
If someone is not disobedient or not weary, then he is not thoughtful.
If Graham is not weary, then Chester is thoughtful, and vice versa.
Paxton being disobedient implies that Caldwell is not confident and Graham is massive.
If someone who is confident is also weary, then he is massive.
Someone is confident and not thoughtful if and only if he is not chestnut. | Caldwell is not confident. | self_contradiction |
Caldwell is not chestnut.
Paxton is weary.
Chester is not disobedient.
Douglas is thoughtful.
Paxton is not disobedient.
Graham is weary.
Hadwin is confident.
Hadwin is chestnut.
Hadwin is not disobedient.
Paxton is massive.
Graham is not disobedient.
Caldwell is confident.All massive people are not confident.
If there is at least one people who is both chestnut and not massive, then Douglas is not disobedient.
If there is someone who is not disobedient, then Hadwin is weary.
If someone is weary or he is not confident, then he is disobedient.
It can be concluded that Caldwell is massive once knowing that Chester is not confident.
If Douglas is not thoughtful, then Gilbert is not weary and Paxton is massive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not chestnut, then Hadwin is not thoughtful.
If someone is not disobedient or not weary, then he is not thoughtful.
If Graham is not weary, then Chester is thoughtful, and vice versa.
Paxton being disobedient implies that Caldwell is not confident and Graham is massive.
If someone who is confident is also weary, then he is massive.
Someone is confident and not thoughtful if and only if he is not chestnut. | Gilbert is thoughtful. | neutral |
Caldwell is not chestnut.
Paxton is weary.
Chester is not disobedient.
Douglas is thoughtful.
Paxton is not disobedient.
Graham is weary.
Hadwin is confident.
Hadwin is chestnut.
Hadwin is not disobedient.
Paxton is massive.
Graham is not disobedient.
Caldwell is confident.All massive people are not confident.
If there is at least one people who is both chestnut and not massive, then Douglas is not disobedient.
If there is someone who is not disobedient, then Hadwin is weary.
If someone is weary or he is not confident, then he is disobedient.
It can be concluded that Caldwell is massive once knowing that Chester is not confident.
If Douglas is not thoughtful, then Gilbert is not weary and Paxton is massive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not chestnut, then Hadwin is not thoughtful.
If someone is not disobedient or not weary, then he is not thoughtful.
If Graham is not weary, then Chester is thoughtful, and vice versa.
Paxton being disobedient implies that Caldwell is not confident and Graham is massive.
If someone who is confident is also weary, then he is massive.
Someone is confident and not thoughtful if and only if he is not chestnut. | Graham is not weary. | contradiction |
Caldwell is not chestnut.
Paxton is weary.
Chester is not disobedient.
Douglas is thoughtful.
Paxton is not disobedient.
Graham is weary.
Hadwin is confident.
Hadwin is chestnut.
Hadwin is not disobedient.
Paxton is massive.
Graham is not disobedient.
Caldwell is confident.All massive people are not confident.
If there is at least one people who is both chestnut and not massive, then Douglas is not disobedient.
If there is someone who is not disobedient, then Hadwin is weary.
If someone is weary or he is not confident, then he is disobedient.
It can be concluded that Caldwell is massive once knowing that Chester is not confident.
If Douglas is not thoughtful, then Gilbert is not weary and Paxton is massive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not chestnut, then Hadwin is not thoughtful.
If someone is not disobedient or not weary, then he is not thoughtful.
If Graham is not weary, then Chester is thoughtful, and vice versa.
Paxton being disobedient implies that Caldwell is not confident and Graham is massive.
If someone who is confident is also weary, then he is massive.
Someone is confident and not thoughtful if and only if he is not chestnut. | Hadwin is confident. | self_contradiction |
Caldwell is not chestnut.
Paxton is weary.
Chester is not disobedient.
Douglas is thoughtful.
Paxton is not disobedient.
Graham is weary.
Hadwin is confident.
Hadwin is chestnut.
Hadwin is not disobedient.
Paxton is massive.
Graham is not disobedient.
Caldwell is confident.All massive people are not confident.
If there is at least one people who is both chestnut and not massive, then Douglas is not disobedient.
If there is someone who is not disobedient, then Hadwin is weary.
If someone is weary or he is not confident, then he is disobedient.
It can be concluded that Caldwell is massive once knowing that Chester is not confident.
If Douglas is not thoughtful, then Gilbert is not weary and Paxton is massive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not chestnut, then Hadwin is not thoughtful.
If someone is not disobedient or not weary, then he is not thoughtful.
If Graham is not weary, then Chester is thoughtful, and vice versa.
Paxton being disobedient implies that Caldwell is not confident and Graham is massive.
If someone who is confident is also weary, then he is massive.
Someone is confident and not thoughtful if and only if he is not chestnut. | Gilbert is confident. | neutral |
Caldwell is not chestnut.
Paxton is weary.
Chester is not disobedient.
Douglas is thoughtful.
Paxton is not disobedient.
Graham is weary.
Hadwin is confident.
Hadwin is chestnut.
Hadwin is not disobedient.
Paxton is massive.
Graham is not disobedient.
Caldwell is confident.All massive people are not confident.
If there is at least one people who is both chestnut and not massive, then Douglas is not disobedient.
If there is someone who is not disobedient, then Hadwin is weary.
If someone is weary or he is not confident, then he is disobedient.
It can be concluded that Caldwell is massive once knowing that Chester is not confident.
If Douglas is not thoughtful, then Gilbert is not weary and Paxton is massive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not chestnut, then Hadwin is not thoughtful.
If someone is not disobedient or not weary, then he is not thoughtful.
If Graham is not weary, then Chester is thoughtful, and vice versa.
Paxton being disobedient implies that Caldwell is not confident and Graham is massive.
If someone who is confident is also weary, then he is massive.
Someone is confident and not thoughtful if and only if he is not chestnut. | Chester is not chestnut. | neutral |
Caldwell is not chestnut.
Paxton is weary.
Chester is not disobedient.
Douglas is thoughtful.
Paxton is not disobedient.
Graham is weary.
Hadwin is confident.
Hadwin is chestnut.
Hadwin is not disobedient.
Paxton is massive.
Graham is not disobedient.
Caldwell is confident.All massive people are not confident.
If there is at least one people who is both chestnut and not massive, then Douglas is not disobedient.
If there is someone who is not disobedient, then Hadwin is weary.
If someone is weary or he is not confident, then he is disobedient.
It can be concluded that Caldwell is massive once knowing that Chester is not confident.
If Douglas is not thoughtful, then Gilbert is not weary and Paxton is massive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not chestnut, then Hadwin is not thoughtful.
If someone is not disobedient or not weary, then he is not thoughtful.
If Graham is not weary, then Chester is thoughtful, and vice versa.
Paxton being disobedient implies that Caldwell is not confident and Graham is massive.
If someone who is confident is also weary, then he is massive.
Someone is confident and not thoughtful if and only if he is not chestnut. | Hadwin is not massive. | contradiction |
Caldwell is not chestnut.
Paxton is weary.
Chester is not disobedient.
Douglas is thoughtful.
Paxton is not disobedient.
Graham is weary.
Hadwin is confident.
Hadwin is chestnut.
Hadwin is not disobedient.
Paxton is massive.
Graham is not disobedient.
Caldwell is confident.All massive people are not confident.
If there is at least one people who is both chestnut and not massive, then Douglas is not disobedient.
If there is someone who is not disobedient, then Hadwin is weary.
If someone is weary or he is not confident, then he is disobedient.
It can be concluded that Caldwell is massive once knowing that Chester is not confident.
If Douglas is not thoughtful, then Gilbert is not weary and Paxton is massive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not chestnut, then Hadwin is not thoughtful.
If someone is not disobedient or not weary, then he is not thoughtful.
If Graham is not weary, then Chester is thoughtful, and vice versa.
Paxton being disobedient implies that Caldwell is not confident and Graham is massive.
If someone who is confident is also weary, then he is massive.
Someone is confident and not thoughtful if and only if he is not chestnut. | Caldwell is not disobedient. | contradiction |
Caldwell is not chestnut.
Paxton is weary.
Chester is not disobedient.
Douglas is thoughtful.
Paxton is not disobedient.
Graham is weary.
Hadwin is confident.
Hadwin is chestnut.
Hadwin is not disobedient.
Paxton is massive.
Graham is not disobedient.
Caldwell is confident.All massive people are not confident.
If there is at least one people who is both chestnut and not massive, then Douglas is not disobedient.
If there is someone who is not disobedient, then Hadwin is weary.
If someone is weary or he is not confident, then he is disobedient.
It can be concluded that Caldwell is massive once knowing that Chester is not confident.
If Douglas is not thoughtful, then Gilbert is not weary and Paxton is massive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not chestnut, then Hadwin is not thoughtful.
If someone is not disobedient or not weary, then he is not thoughtful.
If Graham is not weary, then Chester is thoughtful, and vice versa.
Paxton being disobedient implies that Caldwell is not confident and Graham is massive.
If someone who is confident is also weary, then he is massive.
Someone is confident and not thoughtful if and only if he is not chestnut. | Chester is not massive. | neutral |
Caldwell is not chestnut.
Paxton is weary.
Chester is not disobedient.
Douglas is thoughtful.
Paxton is not disobedient.
Graham is weary.
Hadwin is confident.
Hadwin is chestnut.
Hadwin is not disobedient.
Paxton is massive.
Graham is not disobedient.
Caldwell is confident.All massive people are not confident.
If there is at least one people who is both chestnut and not massive, then Douglas is not disobedient.
If there is someone who is not disobedient, then Hadwin is weary.
If someone is weary or he is not confident, then he is disobedient.
It can be concluded that Caldwell is massive once knowing that Chester is not confident.
If Douglas is not thoughtful, then Gilbert is not weary and Paxton is massive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not chestnut, then Hadwin is not thoughtful.
If someone is not disobedient or not weary, then he is not thoughtful.
If Graham is not weary, then Chester is thoughtful, and vice versa.
Paxton being disobedient implies that Caldwell is not confident and Graham is massive.
If someone who is confident is also weary, then he is massive.
Someone is confident and not thoughtful if and only if he is not chestnut. | Hadwin is weary. | entailment |
Melody is massive.
Sherard is not wrong.
Sherard is grotesque.
Spencer is grotesque.
Sherard is not massive.
Odessa is not outstanding.
Rupert is not outstanding.
Mark is not serious.
Odessa is not wrong.
Melody is powerful.
Spencer is not powerful.
Lee is wrong.If someone who is wrong is also not outstanding, then he is not powerful.
If there is someone who is grotesque, then Melody is outstanding.
Someone is not outstanding and grotesque if and only if he is not powerful.
As long as someone is powerful, he is serious and not massive.
It can be concluded that Spencer is not wrong once knowing that Lee is not serious and Sherard is not outstanding.
If everyone is not massive or serious, then Mark is not outstanding.
It can be concluded that Sherard is not massive once knowing that Spencer is not wrong or Mark is not powerful.
It can be concluded that Rupert is wrong once knowing that Spencer is serious.
If Spencer is not powerful, then Spencer is serious and Spencer is not grotesque, and vice versa.
Someone who is powerful and not massive is always outstanding and not grotesque.
If Lee is outstanding or Spencer is grotesque, then Spencer is powerful.
Melody being serious is equivalent to Sherard being massive and Mark being grotesque. | Odessa is wrong. | contradiction |
Melody is massive.
Sherard is not wrong.
Sherard is grotesque.
Spencer is grotesque.
Sherard is not massive.
Odessa is not outstanding.
Rupert is not outstanding.
Mark is not serious.
Odessa is not wrong.
Melody is powerful.
Spencer is not powerful.
Lee is wrong.If someone who is wrong is also not outstanding, then he is not powerful.
If there is someone who is grotesque, then Melody is outstanding.
Someone is not outstanding and grotesque if and only if he is not powerful.
As long as someone is powerful, he is serious and not massive.
It can be concluded that Spencer is not wrong once knowing that Lee is not serious and Sherard is not outstanding.
If everyone is not massive or serious, then Mark is not outstanding.
It can be concluded that Sherard is not massive once knowing that Spencer is not wrong or Mark is not powerful.
It can be concluded that Rupert is wrong once knowing that Spencer is serious.
If Spencer is not powerful, then Spencer is serious and Spencer is not grotesque, and vice versa.
Someone who is powerful and not massive is always outstanding and not grotesque.
If Lee is outstanding or Spencer is grotesque, then Spencer is powerful.
Melody being serious is equivalent to Sherard being massive and Mark being grotesque. | Mark is not powerful. | neutral |
Melody is massive.
Sherard is not wrong.
Sherard is grotesque.
Spencer is grotesque.
Sherard is not massive.
Odessa is not outstanding.
Rupert is not outstanding.
Mark is not serious.
Odessa is not wrong.
Melody is powerful.
Spencer is not powerful.
Lee is wrong.If someone who is wrong is also not outstanding, then he is not powerful.
If there is someone who is grotesque, then Melody is outstanding.
Someone is not outstanding and grotesque if and only if he is not powerful.
As long as someone is powerful, he is serious and not massive.
It can be concluded that Spencer is not wrong once knowing that Lee is not serious and Sherard is not outstanding.
If everyone is not massive or serious, then Mark is not outstanding.
It can be concluded that Sherard is not massive once knowing that Spencer is not wrong or Mark is not powerful.
It can be concluded that Rupert is wrong once knowing that Spencer is serious.
If Spencer is not powerful, then Spencer is serious and Spencer is not grotesque, and vice versa.
Someone who is powerful and not massive is always outstanding and not grotesque.
If Lee is outstanding or Spencer is grotesque, then Spencer is powerful.
Melody being serious is equivalent to Sherard being massive and Mark being grotesque. | Sherard is massive. | self_contradiction |
Melody is massive.
Sherard is not wrong.
Sherard is grotesque.
Spencer is grotesque.
Sherard is not massive.
Odessa is not outstanding.
Rupert is not outstanding.
Mark is not serious.
Odessa is not wrong.
Melody is powerful.
Spencer is not powerful.
Lee is wrong.If someone who is wrong is also not outstanding, then he is not powerful.
If there is someone who is grotesque, then Melody is outstanding.
Someone is not outstanding and grotesque if and only if he is not powerful.
As long as someone is powerful, he is serious and not massive.
It can be concluded that Spencer is not wrong once knowing that Lee is not serious and Sherard is not outstanding.
If everyone is not massive or serious, then Mark is not outstanding.
It can be concluded that Sherard is not massive once knowing that Spencer is not wrong or Mark is not powerful.
It can be concluded that Rupert is wrong once knowing that Spencer is serious.
If Spencer is not powerful, then Spencer is serious and Spencer is not grotesque, and vice versa.
Someone who is powerful and not massive is always outstanding and not grotesque.
If Lee is outstanding or Spencer is grotesque, then Spencer is powerful.
Melody being serious is equivalent to Sherard being massive and Mark being grotesque. | Mark is not grotesque. | contradiction |
Melody is massive.
Sherard is not wrong.
Sherard is grotesque.
Spencer is grotesque.
Sherard is not massive.
Odessa is not outstanding.
Rupert is not outstanding.
Mark is not serious.
Odessa is not wrong.
Melody is powerful.
Spencer is not powerful.
Lee is wrong.If someone who is wrong is also not outstanding, then he is not powerful.
If there is someone who is grotesque, then Melody is outstanding.
Someone is not outstanding and grotesque if and only if he is not powerful.
As long as someone is powerful, he is serious and not massive.
It can be concluded that Spencer is not wrong once knowing that Lee is not serious and Sherard is not outstanding.
If everyone is not massive or serious, then Mark is not outstanding.
It can be concluded that Sherard is not massive once knowing that Spencer is not wrong or Mark is not powerful.
It can be concluded that Rupert is wrong once knowing that Spencer is serious.
If Spencer is not powerful, then Spencer is serious and Spencer is not grotesque, and vice versa.
Someone who is powerful and not massive is always outstanding and not grotesque.
If Lee is outstanding or Spencer is grotesque, then Spencer is powerful.
Melody being serious is equivalent to Sherard being massive and Mark being grotesque. | Odessa is outstanding. | contradiction |
Melody is massive.
Sherard is not wrong.
Sherard is grotesque.
Spencer is grotesque.
Sherard is not massive.
Odessa is not outstanding.
Rupert is not outstanding.
Mark is not serious.
Odessa is not wrong.
Melody is powerful.
Spencer is not powerful.
Lee is wrong.If someone who is wrong is also not outstanding, then he is not powerful.
If there is someone who is grotesque, then Melody is outstanding.
Someone is not outstanding and grotesque if and only if he is not powerful.
As long as someone is powerful, he is serious and not massive.
It can be concluded that Spencer is not wrong once knowing that Lee is not serious and Sherard is not outstanding.
If everyone is not massive or serious, then Mark is not outstanding.
It can be concluded that Sherard is not massive once knowing that Spencer is not wrong or Mark is not powerful.
It can be concluded that Rupert is wrong once knowing that Spencer is serious.
If Spencer is not powerful, then Spencer is serious and Spencer is not grotesque, and vice versa.
Someone who is powerful and not massive is always outstanding and not grotesque.
If Lee is outstanding or Spencer is grotesque, then Spencer is powerful.
Melody being serious is equivalent to Sherard being massive and Mark being grotesque. | Melody is not massive. | self_contradiction |
Melody is massive.
Sherard is not wrong.
Sherard is grotesque.
Spencer is grotesque.
Sherard is not massive.
Odessa is not outstanding.
Rupert is not outstanding.
Mark is not serious.
Odessa is not wrong.
Melody is powerful.
Spencer is not powerful.
Lee is wrong.If someone who is wrong is also not outstanding, then he is not powerful.
If there is someone who is grotesque, then Melody is outstanding.
Someone is not outstanding and grotesque if and only if he is not powerful.
As long as someone is powerful, he is serious and not massive.
It can be concluded that Spencer is not wrong once knowing that Lee is not serious and Sherard is not outstanding.
If everyone is not massive or serious, then Mark is not outstanding.
It can be concluded that Sherard is not massive once knowing that Spencer is not wrong or Mark is not powerful.
It can be concluded that Rupert is wrong once knowing that Spencer is serious.
If Spencer is not powerful, then Spencer is serious and Spencer is not grotesque, and vice versa.
Someone who is powerful and not massive is always outstanding and not grotesque.
If Lee is outstanding or Spencer is grotesque, then Spencer is powerful.
Melody being serious is equivalent to Sherard being massive and Mark being grotesque. | Spencer is not grotesque. | self_contradiction |
Melody is massive.
Sherard is not wrong.
Sherard is grotesque.
Spencer is grotesque.
Sherard is not massive.
Odessa is not outstanding.
Rupert is not outstanding.
Mark is not serious.
Odessa is not wrong.
Melody is powerful.
Spencer is not powerful.
Lee is wrong.If someone who is wrong is also not outstanding, then he is not powerful.
If there is someone who is grotesque, then Melody is outstanding.
Someone is not outstanding and grotesque if and only if he is not powerful.
As long as someone is powerful, he is serious and not massive.
It can be concluded that Spencer is not wrong once knowing that Lee is not serious and Sherard is not outstanding.
If everyone is not massive or serious, then Mark is not outstanding.
It can be concluded that Sherard is not massive once knowing that Spencer is not wrong or Mark is not powerful.
It can be concluded that Rupert is wrong once knowing that Spencer is serious.
If Spencer is not powerful, then Spencer is serious and Spencer is not grotesque, and vice versa.
Someone who is powerful and not massive is always outstanding and not grotesque.
If Lee is outstanding or Spencer is grotesque, then Spencer is powerful.
Melody being serious is equivalent to Sherard being massive and Mark being grotesque. | Rupert is not powerful. | entailment |
Melody is massive.
Sherard is not wrong.
Sherard is grotesque.
Spencer is grotesque.
Sherard is not massive.
Odessa is not outstanding.
Rupert is not outstanding.
Mark is not serious.
Odessa is not wrong.
Melody is powerful.
Spencer is not powerful.
Lee is wrong.If someone who is wrong is also not outstanding, then he is not powerful.
If there is someone who is grotesque, then Melody is outstanding.
Someone is not outstanding and grotesque if and only if he is not powerful.
As long as someone is powerful, he is serious and not massive.
It can be concluded that Spencer is not wrong once knowing that Lee is not serious and Sherard is not outstanding.
If everyone is not massive or serious, then Mark is not outstanding.
It can be concluded that Sherard is not massive once knowing that Spencer is not wrong or Mark is not powerful.
It can be concluded that Rupert is wrong once knowing that Spencer is serious.
If Spencer is not powerful, then Spencer is serious and Spencer is not grotesque, and vice versa.
Someone who is powerful and not massive is always outstanding and not grotesque.
If Lee is outstanding or Spencer is grotesque, then Spencer is powerful.
Melody being serious is equivalent to Sherard being massive and Mark being grotesque. | Sherard is not massive. | self_contradiction |
Melody is massive.
Sherard is not wrong.
Sherard is grotesque.
Spencer is grotesque.
Sherard is not massive.
Odessa is not outstanding.
Rupert is not outstanding.
Mark is not serious.
Odessa is not wrong.
Melody is powerful.
Spencer is not powerful.
Lee is wrong.If someone who is wrong is also not outstanding, then he is not powerful.
If there is someone who is grotesque, then Melody is outstanding.
Someone is not outstanding and grotesque if and only if he is not powerful.
As long as someone is powerful, he is serious and not massive.
It can be concluded that Spencer is not wrong once knowing that Lee is not serious and Sherard is not outstanding.
If everyone is not massive or serious, then Mark is not outstanding.
It can be concluded that Sherard is not massive once knowing that Spencer is not wrong or Mark is not powerful.
It can be concluded that Rupert is wrong once knowing that Spencer is serious.
If Spencer is not powerful, then Spencer is serious and Spencer is not grotesque, and vice versa.
Someone who is powerful and not massive is always outstanding and not grotesque.
If Lee is outstanding or Spencer is grotesque, then Spencer is powerful.
Melody being serious is equivalent to Sherard being massive and Mark being grotesque. | Mark is serious. | contradiction |
Melody is massive.
Sherard is not wrong.
Sherard is grotesque.
Spencer is grotesque.
Sherard is not massive.
Odessa is not outstanding.
Rupert is not outstanding.
Mark is not serious.
Odessa is not wrong.
Melody is powerful.
Spencer is not powerful.
Lee is wrong.If someone who is wrong is also not outstanding, then he is not powerful.
If there is someone who is grotesque, then Melody is outstanding.
Someone is not outstanding and grotesque if and only if he is not powerful.
As long as someone is powerful, he is serious and not massive.
It can be concluded that Spencer is not wrong once knowing that Lee is not serious and Sherard is not outstanding.
If everyone is not massive or serious, then Mark is not outstanding.
It can be concluded that Sherard is not massive once knowing that Spencer is not wrong or Mark is not powerful.
It can be concluded that Rupert is wrong once knowing that Spencer is serious.
If Spencer is not powerful, then Spencer is serious and Spencer is not grotesque, and vice versa.
Someone who is powerful and not massive is always outstanding and not grotesque.
If Lee is outstanding or Spencer is grotesque, then Spencer is powerful.
Melody being serious is equivalent to Sherard being massive and Mark being grotesque. | Mark is wrong. | neutral |
Melody is massive.
Sherard is not wrong.
Sherard is grotesque.
Spencer is grotesque.
Sherard is not massive.
Odessa is not outstanding.
Rupert is not outstanding.
Mark is not serious.
Odessa is not wrong.
Melody is powerful.
Spencer is not powerful.
Lee is wrong.If someone who is wrong is also not outstanding, then he is not powerful.
If there is someone who is grotesque, then Melody is outstanding.
Someone is not outstanding and grotesque if and only if he is not powerful.
As long as someone is powerful, he is serious and not massive.
It can be concluded that Spencer is not wrong once knowing that Lee is not serious and Sherard is not outstanding.
If everyone is not massive or serious, then Mark is not outstanding.
It can be concluded that Sherard is not massive once knowing that Spencer is not wrong or Mark is not powerful.
It can be concluded that Rupert is wrong once knowing that Spencer is serious.
If Spencer is not powerful, then Spencer is serious and Spencer is not grotesque, and vice versa.
Someone who is powerful and not massive is always outstanding and not grotesque.
If Lee is outstanding or Spencer is grotesque, then Spencer is powerful.
Melody being serious is equivalent to Sherard being massive and Mark being grotesque. | Odessa is not outstanding. | entailment |
Melody is massive.
Sherard is not wrong.
Sherard is grotesque.
Spencer is grotesque.
Sherard is not massive.
Odessa is not outstanding.
Rupert is not outstanding.
Mark is not serious.
Odessa is not wrong.
Melody is powerful.
Spencer is not powerful.
Lee is wrong.If someone who is wrong is also not outstanding, then he is not powerful.
If there is someone who is grotesque, then Melody is outstanding.
Someone is not outstanding and grotesque if and only if he is not powerful.
As long as someone is powerful, he is serious and not massive.
It can be concluded that Spencer is not wrong once knowing that Lee is not serious and Sherard is not outstanding.
If everyone is not massive or serious, then Mark is not outstanding.
It can be concluded that Sherard is not massive once knowing that Spencer is not wrong or Mark is not powerful.
It can be concluded that Rupert is wrong once knowing that Spencer is serious.
If Spencer is not powerful, then Spencer is serious and Spencer is not grotesque, and vice versa.
Someone who is powerful and not massive is always outstanding and not grotesque.
If Lee is outstanding or Spencer is grotesque, then Spencer is powerful.
Melody being serious is equivalent to Sherard being massive and Mark being grotesque. | Mark is not serious. | entailment |
Melody is massive.
Sherard is not wrong.
Sherard is grotesque.
Spencer is grotesque.
Sherard is not massive.
Odessa is not outstanding.
Rupert is not outstanding.
Mark is not serious.
Odessa is not wrong.
Melody is powerful.
Spencer is not powerful.
Lee is wrong.If someone who is wrong is also not outstanding, then he is not powerful.
If there is someone who is grotesque, then Melody is outstanding.
Someone is not outstanding and grotesque if and only if he is not powerful.
As long as someone is powerful, he is serious and not massive.
It can be concluded that Spencer is not wrong once knowing that Lee is not serious and Sherard is not outstanding.
If everyone is not massive or serious, then Mark is not outstanding.
It can be concluded that Sherard is not massive once knowing that Spencer is not wrong or Mark is not powerful.
It can be concluded that Rupert is wrong once knowing that Spencer is serious.
If Spencer is not powerful, then Spencer is serious and Spencer is not grotesque, and vice versa.
Someone who is powerful and not massive is always outstanding and not grotesque.
If Lee is outstanding or Spencer is grotesque, then Spencer is powerful.
Melody being serious is equivalent to Sherard being massive and Mark being grotesque. | Rupert is not outstanding. | entailment |
Melody is massive.
Sherard is not wrong.
Sherard is grotesque.
Spencer is grotesque.
Sherard is not massive.
Odessa is not outstanding.
Rupert is not outstanding.
Mark is not serious.
Odessa is not wrong.
Melody is powerful.
Spencer is not powerful.
Lee is wrong.If someone who is wrong is also not outstanding, then he is not powerful.
If there is someone who is grotesque, then Melody is outstanding.
Someone is not outstanding and grotesque if and only if he is not powerful.
As long as someone is powerful, he is serious and not massive.
It can be concluded that Spencer is not wrong once knowing that Lee is not serious and Sherard is not outstanding.
If everyone is not massive or serious, then Mark is not outstanding.
It can be concluded that Sherard is not massive once knowing that Spencer is not wrong or Mark is not powerful.
It can be concluded that Rupert is wrong once knowing that Spencer is serious.
If Spencer is not powerful, then Spencer is serious and Spencer is not grotesque, and vice versa.
Someone who is powerful and not massive is always outstanding and not grotesque.
If Lee is outstanding or Spencer is grotesque, then Spencer is powerful.
Melody being serious is equivalent to Sherard being massive and Mark being grotesque. | Spencer is outstanding. | self_contradiction |
Melody is massive.
Sherard is not wrong.
Sherard is grotesque.
Spencer is grotesque.
Sherard is not massive.
Odessa is not outstanding.
Rupert is not outstanding.
Mark is not serious.
Odessa is not wrong.
Melody is powerful.
Spencer is not powerful.
Lee is wrong.If someone who is wrong is also not outstanding, then he is not powerful.
If there is someone who is grotesque, then Melody is outstanding.
Someone is not outstanding and grotesque if and only if he is not powerful.
As long as someone is powerful, he is serious and not massive.
It can be concluded that Spencer is not wrong once knowing that Lee is not serious and Sherard is not outstanding.
If everyone is not massive or serious, then Mark is not outstanding.
It can be concluded that Sherard is not massive once knowing that Spencer is not wrong or Mark is not powerful.
It can be concluded that Rupert is wrong once knowing that Spencer is serious.
If Spencer is not powerful, then Spencer is serious and Spencer is not grotesque, and vice versa.
Someone who is powerful and not massive is always outstanding and not grotesque.
If Lee is outstanding or Spencer is grotesque, then Spencer is powerful.
Melody being serious is equivalent to Sherard being massive and Mark being grotesque. | Lee is not massive. | neutral |
Melody is massive.
Sherard is not wrong.
Sherard is grotesque.
Spencer is grotesque.
Sherard is not massive.
Odessa is not outstanding.
Rupert is not outstanding.
Mark is not serious.
Odessa is not wrong.
Melody is powerful.
Spencer is not powerful.
Lee is wrong.If someone who is wrong is also not outstanding, then he is not powerful.
If there is someone who is grotesque, then Melody is outstanding.
Someone is not outstanding and grotesque if and only if he is not powerful.
As long as someone is powerful, he is serious and not massive.
It can be concluded that Spencer is not wrong once knowing that Lee is not serious and Sherard is not outstanding.
If everyone is not massive or serious, then Mark is not outstanding.
It can be concluded that Sherard is not massive once knowing that Spencer is not wrong or Mark is not powerful.
It can be concluded that Rupert is wrong once knowing that Spencer is serious.
If Spencer is not powerful, then Spencer is serious and Spencer is not grotesque, and vice versa.
Someone who is powerful and not massive is always outstanding and not grotesque.
If Lee is outstanding or Spencer is grotesque, then Spencer is powerful.
Melody being serious is equivalent to Sherard being massive and Mark being grotesque. | Odessa is powerful. | neutral |
Melody is massive.
Sherard is not wrong.
Sherard is grotesque.
Spencer is grotesque.
Sherard is not massive.
Odessa is not outstanding.
Rupert is not outstanding.
Mark is not serious.
Odessa is not wrong.
Melody is powerful.
Spencer is not powerful.
Lee is wrong.If someone who is wrong is also not outstanding, then he is not powerful.
If there is someone who is grotesque, then Melody is outstanding.
Someone is not outstanding and grotesque if and only if he is not powerful.
As long as someone is powerful, he is serious and not massive.
It can be concluded that Spencer is not wrong once knowing that Lee is not serious and Sherard is not outstanding.
If everyone is not massive or serious, then Mark is not outstanding.
It can be concluded that Sherard is not massive once knowing that Spencer is not wrong or Mark is not powerful.
It can be concluded that Rupert is wrong once knowing that Spencer is serious.
If Spencer is not powerful, then Spencer is serious and Spencer is not grotesque, and vice versa.
Someone who is powerful and not massive is always outstanding and not grotesque.
If Lee is outstanding or Spencer is grotesque, then Spencer is powerful.
Melody being serious is equivalent to Sherard being massive and Mark being grotesque. | Melody is not powerful. | contradiction |
Melody is massive.
Sherard is not wrong.
Sherard is grotesque.
Spencer is grotesque.
Sherard is not massive.
Odessa is not outstanding.
Rupert is not outstanding.
Mark is not serious.
Odessa is not wrong.
Melody is powerful.
Spencer is not powerful.
Lee is wrong.If someone who is wrong is also not outstanding, then he is not powerful.
If there is someone who is grotesque, then Melody is outstanding.
Someone is not outstanding and grotesque if and only if he is not powerful.
As long as someone is powerful, he is serious and not massive.
It can be concluded that Spencer is not wrong once knowing that Lee is not serious and Sherard is not outstanding.
If everyone is not massive or serious, then Mark is not outstanding.
It can be concluded that Sherard is not massive once knowing that Spencer is not wrong or Mark is not powerful.
It can be concluded that Rupert is wrong once knowing that Spencer is serious.
If Spencer is not powerful, then Spencer is serious and Spencer is not grotesque, and vice versa.
Someone who is powerful and not massive is always outstanding and not grotesque.
If Lee is outstanding or Spencer is grotesque, then Spencer is powerful.
Melody being serious is equivalent to Sherard being massive and Mark being grotesque. | Odessa is not grotesque. | neutral |
Melody is massive.
Sherard is not wrong.
Sherard is grotesque.
Spencer is grotesque.
Sherard is not massive.
Odessa is not outstanding.
Rupert is not outstanding.
Mark is not serious.
Odessa is not wrong.
Melody is powerful.
Spencer is not powerful.
Lee is wrong.If someone who is wrong is also not outstanding, then he is not powerful.
If there is someone who is grotesque, then Melody is outstanding.
Someone is not outstanding and grotesque if and only if he is not powerful.
As long as someone is powerful, he is serious and not massive.
It can be concluded that Spencer is not wrong once knowing that Lee is not serious and Sherard is not outstanding.
If everyone is not massive or serious, then Mark is not outstanding.
It can be concluded that Sherard is not massive once knowing that Spencer is not wrong or Mark is not powerful.
It can be concluded that Rupert is wrong once knowing that Spencer is serious.
If Spencer is not powerful, then Spencer is serious and Spencer is not grotesque, and vice versa.
Someone who is powerful and not massive is always outstanding and not grotesque.
If Lee is outstanding or Spencer is grotesque, then Spencer is powerful.
Melody being serious is equivalent to Sherard being massive and Mark being grotesque. | Mark is grotesque. | entailment |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.