premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Murray is not stormy.
Irvin is not sufficient.
Hardy is humble.
Samson is sufficient.
Irvin is orange.
Irvin is obedient.
Hardy is not orange.
Irvin is big.
Morris is not stormy.
Bowen is not big.
Olaf is obedient.
Murray is not big.If someone is both big and not sufficient, then he is not orange.
Hardy is orange if and only if Samson is sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is both sufficient and obedient, then Hardy is big.
Someone being both not humble and not orange is equivalent to being sufficient.
If Bowen is orange, then Samson is not humble and Murray is not obedient.
If someone is obedient, then he is both not humble and not sufficient.
If Olaf is not obedient, then Murray is not orange.
Hardy being sufficient or Bowen being not big implies that Samson is not stormy.
If there is someone who is big, then Olaf is not obedient.
If Bowen is not orange, then Morris is not big, and vice versa.
Someone being not sufficient is equivalent to being not big.
Someone is obedient and sufficient if and only if he is big and not humble. | Murray is not orange. | entailment |
Murray is not stormy.
Irvin is not sufficient.
Hardy is humble.
Samson is sufficient.
Irvin is orange.
Irvin is obedient.
Hardy is not orange.
Irvin is big.
Morris is not stormy.
Bowen is not big.
Olaf is obedient.
Murray is not big.If someone is both big and not sufficient, then he is not orange.
Hardy is orange if and only if Samson is sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is both sufficient and obedient, then Hardy is big.
Someone being both not humble and not orange is equivalent to being sufficient.
If Bowen is orange, then Samson is not humble and Murray is not obedient.
If someone is obedient, then he is both not humble and not sufficient.
If Olaf is not obedient, then Murray is not orange.
Hardy being sufficient or Bowen being not big implies that Samson is not stormy.
If there is someone who is big, then Olaf is not obedient.
If Bowen is not orange, then Morris is not big, and vice versa.
Someone being not sufficient is equivalent to being not big.
Someone is obedient and sufficient if and only if he is big and not humble. | Murray is not big. | entailment |
Murray is not stormy.
Irvin is not sufficient.
Hardy is humble.
Samson is sufficient.
Irvin is orange.
Irvin is obedient.
Hardy is not orange.
Irvin is big.
Morris is not stormy.
Bowen is not big.
Olaf is obedient.
Murray is not big.If someone is both big and not sufficient, then he is not orange.
Hardy is orange if and only if Samson is sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is both sufficient and obedient, then Hardy is big.
Someone being both not humble and not orange is equivalent to being sufficient.
If Bowen is orange, then Samson is not humble and Murray is not obedient.
If someone is obedient, then he is both not humble and not sufficient.
If Olaf is not obedient, then Murray is not orange.
Hardy being sufficient or Bowen being not big implies that Samson is not stormy.
If there is someone who is big, then Olaf is not obedient.
If Bowen is not orange, then Morris is not big, and vice versa.
Someone being not sufficient is equivalent to being not big.
Someone is obedient and sufficient if and only if he is big and not humble. | Bowen is not big. | entailment |
Murray is not stormy.
Irvin is not sufficient.
Hardy is humble.
Samson is sufficient.
Irvin is orange.
Irvin is obedient.
Hardy is not orange.
Irvin is big.
Morris is not stormy.
Bowen is not big.
Olaf is obedient.
Murray is not big.If someone is both big and not sufficient, then he is not orange.
Hardy is orange if and only if Samson is sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is both sufficient and obedient, then Hardy is big.
Someone being both not humble and not orange is equivalent to being sufficient.
If Bowen is orange, then Samson is not humble and Murray is not obedient.
If someone is obedient, then he is both not humble and not sufficient.
If Olaf is not obedient, then Murray is not orange.
Hardy being sufficient or Bowen being not big implies that Samson is not stormy.
If there is someone who is big, then Olaf is not obedient.
If Bowen is not orange, then Morris is not big, and vice versa.
Someone being not sufficient is equivalent to being not big.
Someone is obedient and sufficient if and only if he is big and not humble. | Morris is not big. | neutral |
Murray is not stormy.
Irvin is not sufficient.
Hardy is humble.
Samson is sufficient.
Irvin is orange.
Irvin is obedient.
Hardy is not orange.
Irvin is big.
Morris is not stormy.
Bowen is not big.
Olaf is obedient.
Murray is not big.If someone is both big and not sufficient, then he is not orange.
Hardy is orange if and only if Samson is sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is both sufficient and obedient, then Hardy is big.
Someone being both not humble and not orange is equivalent to being sufficient.
If Bowen is orange, then Samson is not humble and Murray is not obedient.
If someone is obedient, then he is both not humble and not sufficient.
If Olaf is not obedient, then Murray is not orange.
Hardy being sufficient or Bowen being not big implies that Samson is not stormy.
If there is someone who is big, then Olaf is not obedient.
If Bowen is not orange, then Morris is not big, and vice versa.
Someone being not sufficient is equivalent to being not big.
Someone is obedient and sufficient if and only if he is big and not humble. | Hardy is not obedient. | neutral |
Murray is not stormy.
Irvin is not sufficient.
Hardy is humble.
Samson is sufficient.
Irvin is orange.
Irvin is obedient.
Hardy is not orange.
Irvin is big.
Morris is not stormy.
Bowen is not big.
Olaf is obedient.
Murray is not big.If someone is both big and not sufficient, then he is not orange.
Hardy is orange if and only if Samson is sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is both sufficient and obedient, then Hardy is big.
Someone being both not humble and not orange is equivalent to being sufficient.
If Bowen is orange, then Samson is not humble and Murray is not obedient.
If someone is obedient, then he is both not humble and not sufficient.
If Olaf is not obedient, then Murray is not orange.
Hardy being sufficient or Bowen being not big implies that Samson is not stormy.
If there is someone who is big, then Olaf is not obedient.
If Bowen is not orange, then Morris is not big, and vice versa.
Someone being not sufficient is equivalent to being not big.
Someone is obedient and sufficient if and only if he is big and not humble. | Irvin is orange. | self_contradiction |
Murray is not stormy.
Irvin is not sufficient.
Hardy is humble.
Samson is sufficient.
Irvin is orange.
Irvin is obedient.
Hardy is not orange.
Irvin is big.
Morris is not stormy.
Bowen is not big.
Olaf is obedient.
Murray is not big.If someone is both big and not sufficient, then he is not orange.
Hardy is orange if and only if Samson is sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is both sufficient and obedient, then Hardy is big.
Someone being both not humble and not orange is equivalent to being sufficient.
If Bowen is orange, then Samson is not humble and Murray is not obedient.
If someone is obedient, then he is both not humble and not sufficient.
If Olaf is not obedient, then Murray is not orange.
Hardy being sufficient or Bowen being not big implies that Samson is not stormy.
If there is someone who is big, then Olaf is not obedient.
If Bowen is not orange, then Morris is not big, and vice versa.
Someone being not sufficient is equivalent to being not big.
Someone is obedient and sufficient if and only if he is big and not humble. | Samson is obedient. | neutral |
Murray is not stormy.
Irvin is not sufficient.
Hardy is humble.
Samson is sufficient.
Irvin is orange.
Irvin is obedient.
Hardy is not orange.
Irvin is big.
Morris is not stormy.
Bowen is not big.
Olaf is obedient.
Murray is not big.If someone is both big and not sufficient, then he is not orange.
Hardy is orange if and only if Samson is sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is both sufficient and obedient, then Hardy is big.
Someone being both not humble and not orange is equivalent to being sufficient.
If Bowen is orange, then Samson is not humble and Murray is not obedient.
If someone is obedient, then he is both not humble and not sufficient.
If Olaf is not obedient, then Murray is not orange.
Hardy being sufficient or Bowen being not big implies that Samson is not stormy.
If there is someone who is big, then Olaf is not obedient.
If Bowen is not orange, then Morris is not big, and vice versa.
Someone being not sufficient is equivalent to being not big.
Someone is obedient and sufficient if and only if he is big and not humble. | Hardy is orange. | self_contradiction |
Murray is not stormy.
Irvin is not sufficient.
Hardy is humble.
Samson is sufficient.
Irvin is orange.
Irvin is obedient.
Hardy is not orange.
Irvin is big.
Morris is not stormy.
Bowen is not big.
Olaf is obedient.
Murray is not big.If someone is both big and not sufficient, then he is not orange.
Hardy is orange if and only if Samson is sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is both sufficient and obedient, then Hardy is big.
Someone being both not humble and not orange is equivalent to being sufficient.
If Bowen is orange, then Samson is not humble and Murray is not obedient.
If someone is obedient, then he is both not humble and not sufficient.
If Olaf is not obedient, then Murray is not orange.
Hardy being sufficient or Bowen being not big implies that Samson is not stormy.
If there is someone who is big, then Olaf is not obedient.
If Bowen is not orange, then Morris is not big, and vice versa.
Someone being not sufficient is equivalent to being not big.
Someone is obedient and sufficient if and only if he is big and not humble. | Bowen is humble. | neutral |
Murray is not stormy.
Irvin is not sufficient.
Hardy is humble.
Samson is sufficient.
Irvin is orange.
Irvin is obedient.
Hardy is not orange.
Irvin is big.
Morris is not stormy.
Bowen is not big.
Olaf is obedient.
Murray is not big.If someone is both big and not sufficient, then he is not orange.
Hardy is orange if and only if Samson is sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is both sufficient and obedient, then Hardy is big.
Someone being both not humble and not orange is equivalent to being sufficient.
If Bowen is orange, then Samson is not humble and Murray is not obedient.
If someone is obedient, then he is both not humble and not sufficient.
If Olaf is not obedient, then Murray is not orange.
Hardy being sufficient or Bowen being not big implies that Samson is not stormy.
If there is someone who is big, then Olaf is not obedient.
If Bowen is not orange, then Morris is not big, and vice versa.
Someone being not sufficient is equivalent to being not big.
Someone is obedient and sufficient if and only if he is big and not humble. | Olaf is not sufficient. | entailment |
Murray is not stormy.
Irvin is not sufficient.
Hardy is humble.
Samson is sufficient.
Irvin is orange.
Irvin is obedient.
Hardy is not orange.
Irvin is big.
Morris is not stormy.
Bowen is not big.
Olaf is obedient.
Murray is not big.If someone is both big and not sufficient, then he is not orange.
Hardy is orange if and only if Samson is sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is both sufficient and obedient, then Hardy is big.
Someone being both not humble and not orange is equivalent to being sufficient.
If Bowen is orange, then Samson is not humble and Murray is not obedient.
If someone is obedient, then he is both not humble and not sufficient.
If Olaf is not obedient, then Murray is not orange.
Hardy being sufficient or Bowen being not big implies that Samson is not stormy.
If there is someone who is big, then Olaf is not obedient.
If Bowen is not orange, then Morris is not big, and vice versa.
Someone being not sufficient is equivalent to being not big.
Someone is obedient and sufficient if and only if he is big and not humble. | Murray is stormy. | contradiction |
Murray is not stormy.
Irvin is not sufficient.
Hardy is humble.
Samson is sufficient.
Irvin is orange.
Irvin is obedient.
Hardy is not orange.
Irvin is big.
Morris is not stormy.
Bowen is not big.
Olaf is obedient.
Murray is not big.If someone is both big and not sufficient, then he is not orange.
Hardy is orange if and only if Samson is sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is both sufficient and obedient, then Hardy is big.
Someone being both not humble and not orange is equivalent to being sufficient.
If Bowen is orange, then Samson is not humble and Murray is not obedient.
If someone is obedient, then he is both not humble and not sufficient.
If Olaf is not obedient, then Murray is not orange.
Hardy being sufficient or Bowen being not big implies that Samson is not stormy.
If there is someone who is big, then Olaf is not obedient.
If Bowen is not orange, then Morris is not big, and vice versa.
Someone being not sufficient is equivalent to being not big.
Someone is obedient and sufficient if and only if he is big and not humble. | Hardy is not stormy. | neutral |
Murray is not stormy.
Irvin is not sufficient.
Hardy is humble.
Samson is sufficient.
Irvin is orange.
Irvin is obedient.
Hardy is not orange.
Irvin is big.
Morris is not stormy.
Bowen is not big.
Olaf is obedient.
Murray is not big.If someone is both big and not sufficient, then he is not orange.
Hardy is orange if and only if Samson is sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is both sufficient and obedient, then Hardy is big.
Someone being both not humble and not orange is equivalent to being sufficient.
If Bowen is orange, then Samson is not humble and Murray is not obedient.
If someone is obedient, then he is both not humble and not sufficient.
If Olaf is not obedient, then Murray is not orange.
Hardy being sufficient or Bowen being not big implies that Samson is not stormy.
If there is someone who is big, then Olaf is not obedient.
If Bowen is not orange, then Morris is not big, and vice versa.
Someone being not sufficient is equivalent to being not big.
Someone is obedient and sufficient if and only if he is big and not humble. | Olaf is big. | contradiction |
Murray is not stormy.
Irvin is not sufficient.
Hardy is humble.
Samson is sufficient.
Irvin is orange.
Irvin is obedient.
Hardy is not orange.
Irvin is big.
Morris is not stormy.
Bowen is not big.
Olaf is obedient.
Murray is not big.If someone is both big and not sufficient, then he is not orange.
Hardy is orange if and only if Samson is sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is both sufficient and obedient, then Hardy is big.
Someone being both not humble and not orange is equivalent to being sufficient.
If Bowen is orange, then Samson is not humble and Murray is not obedient.
If someone is obedient, then he is both not humble and not sufficient.
If Olaf is not obedient, then Murray is not orange.
Hardy being sufficient or Bowen being not big implies that Samson is not stormy.
If there is someone who is big, then Olaf is not obedient.
If Bowen is not orange, then Morris is not big, and vice versa.
Someone being not sufficient is equivalent to being not big.
Someone is obedient and sufficient if and only if he is big and not humble. | Bowen is sufficient. | contradiction |
Murray is not stormy.
Irvin is not sufficient.
Hardy is humble.
Samson is sufficient.
Irvin is orange.
Irvin is obedient.
Hardy is not orange.
Irvin is big.
Morris is not stormy.
Bowen is not big.
Olaf is obedient.
Murray is not big.If someone is both big and not sufficient, then he is not orange.
Hardy is orange if and only if Samson is sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is both sufficient and obedient, then Hardy is big.
Someone being both not humble and not orange is equivalent to being sufficient.
If Bowen is orange, then Samson is not humble and Murray is not obedient.
If someone is obedient, then he is both not humble and not sufficient.
If Olaf is not obedient, then Murray is not orange.
Hardy being sufficient or Bowen being not big implies that Samson is not stormy.
If there is someone who is big, then Olaf is not obedient.
If Bowen is not orange, then Morris is not big, and vice versa.
Someone being not sufficient is equivalent to being not big.
Someone is obedient and sufficient if and only if he is big and not humble. | Morris is stormy. | contradiction |
Murray is not stormy.
Irvin is not sufficient.
Hardy is humble.
Samson is sufficient.
Irvin is orange.
Irvin is obedient.
Hardy is not orange.
Irvin is big.
Morris is not stormy.
Bowen is not big.
Olaf is obedient.
Murray is not big.If someone is both big and not sufficient, then he is not orange.
Hardy is orange if and only if Samson is sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is both sufficient and obedient, then Hardy is big.
Someone being both not humble and not orange is equivalent to being sufficient.
If Bowen is orange, then Samson is not humble and Murray is not obedient.
If someone is obedient, then he is both not humble and not sufficient.
If Olaf is not obedient, then Murray is not orange.
Hardy being sufficient or Bowen being not big implies that Samson is not stormy.
If there is someone who is big, then Olaf is not obedient.
If Bowen is not orange, then Morris is not big, and vice versa.
Someone being not sufficient is equivalent to being not big.
Someone is obedient and sufficient if and only if he is big and not humble. | Murray is not stormy. | entailment |
Murray is not stormy.
Irvin is not sufficient.
Hardy is humble.
Samson is sufficient.
Irvin is orange.
Irvin is obedient.
Hardy is not orange.
Irvin is big.
Morris is not stormy.
Bowen is not big.
Olaf is obedient.
Murray is not big.If someone is both big and not sufficient, then he is not orange.
Hardy is orange if and only if Samson is sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is both sufficient and obedient, then Hardy is big.
Someone being both not humble and not orange is equivalent to being sufficient.
If Bowen is orange, then Samson is not humble and Murray is not obedient.
If someone is obedient, then he is both not humble and not sufficient.
If Olaf is not obedient, then Murray is not orange.
Hardy being sufficient or Bowen being not big implies that Samson is not stormy.
If there is someone who is big, then Olaf is not obedient.
If Bowen is not orange, then Morris is not big, and vice versa.
Someone being not sufficient is equivalent to being not big.
Someone is obedient and sufficient if and only if he is big and not humble. | Irvin is not big. | self_contradiction |
Murray is not stormy.
Irvin is not sufficient.
Hardy is humble.
Samson is sufficient.
Irvin is orange.
Irvin is obedient.
Hardy is not orange.
Irvin is big.
Morris is not stormy.
Bowen is not big.
Olaf is obedient.
Murray is not big.If someone is both big and not sufficient, then he is not orange.
Hardy is orange if and only if Samson is sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is both sufficient and obedient, then Hardy is big.
Someone being both not humble and not orange is equivalent to being sufficient.
If Bowen is orange, then Samson is not humble and Murray is not obedient.
If someone is obedient, then he is both not humble and not sufficient.
If Olaf is not obedient, then Murray is not orange.
Hardy being sufficient or Bowen being not big implies that Samson is not stormy.
If there is someone who is big, then Olaf is not obedient.
If Bowen is not orange, then Morris is not big, and vice versa.
Someone being not sufficient is equivalent to being not big.
Someone is obedient and sufficient if and only if he is big and not humble. | Irvin is not sufficient. | self_contradiction |
Murray is not stormy.
Irvin is not sufficient.
Hardy is humble.
Samson is sufficient.
Irvin is orange.
Irvin is obedient.
Hardy is not orange.
Irvin is big.
Morris is not stormy.
Bowen is not big.
Olaf is obedient.
Murray is not big.If someone is both big and not sufficient, then he is not orange.
Hardy is orange if and only if Samson is sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is both sufficient and obedient, then Hardy is big.
Someone being both not humble and not orange is equivalent to being sufficient.
If Bowen is orange, then Samson is not humble and Murray is not obedient.
If someone is obedient, then he is both not humble and not sufficient.
If Olaf is not obedient, then Murray is not orange.
Hardy being sufficient or Bowen being not big implies that Samson is not stormy.
If there is someone who is big, then Olaf is not obedient.
If Bowen is not orange, then Morris is not big, and vice versa.
Someone being not sufficient is equivalent to being not big.
Someone is obedient and sufficient if and only if he is big and not humble. | Hardy is not orange. | self_contradiction |
Murray is not stormy.
Irvin is not sufficient.
Hardy is humble.
Samson is sufficient.
Irvin is orange.
Irvin is obedient.
Hardy is not orange.
Irvin is big.
Morris is not stormy.
Bowen is not big.
Olaf is obedient.
Murray is not big.If someone is both big and not sufficient, then he is not orange.
Hardy is orange if and only if Samson is sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is both sufficient and obedient, then Hardy is big.
Someone being both not humble and not orange is equivalent to being sufficient.
If Bowen is orange, then Samson is not humble and Murray is not obedient.
If someone is obedient, then he is both not humble and not sufficient.
If Olaf is not obedient, then Murray is not orange.
Hardy being sufficient or Bowen being not big implies that Samson is not stormy.
If there is someone who is big, then Olaf is not obedient.
If Bowen is not orange, then Morris is not big, and vice versa.
Someone being not sufficient is equivalent to being not big.
Someone is obedient and sufficient if and only if he is big and not humble. | Hardy is not humble. | contradiction |
Shelley is scary.
John is scary.
Ethan is shiny.
Shelley is good.
Mila is scary.
John is weary.
Mila is splendid.
Ethan is not weary.
Robert is not shiny.
Ethan is splendid.
Robert is not weary.
Arthur is not weary.If everyone is weary or thoughtful, then John is not splendid.
Isaac being not thoughtful implies that Shelley is scary and Robert is splendid.
If Robert is not scary or John is not splendid, then Arthur is shiny.
If there is someone who is either good or not splendid, then Shelley is not shiny.
John is weary if and only if Mila is not scary.
If Ethan is scary, then Shelley is not good and John is not thoughtful.
Someone is not scary and thoughtful if and only if he is not shiny.
If there is someone who is both not splendid and not weary, then Mila is not thoughtful.
If someone is scary or not splendid, then he is not weary.
If there is someone who is both weary and splendid, then Ethan is thoughtful and Ethan is good.
All not splendid people are not scary.
If Arthur is not splendid, then John is shiny. | Robert is not weary. | entailment |
Shelley is scary.
John is scary.
Ethan is shiny.
Shelley is good.
Mila is scary.
John is weary.
Mila is splendid.
Ethan is not weary.
Robert is not shiny.
Ethan is splendid.
Robert is not weary.
Arthur is not weary.If everyone is weary or thoughtful, then John is not splendid.
Isaac being not thoughtful implies that Shelley is scary and Robert is splendid.
If Robert is not scary or John is not splendid, then Arthur is shiny.
If there is someone who is either good or not splendid, then Shelley is not shiny.
John is weary if and only if Mila is not scary.
If Ethan is scary, then Shelley is not good and John is not thoughtful.
Someone is not scary and thoughtful if and only if he is not shiny.
If there is someone who is both not splendid and not weary, then Mila is not thoughtful.
If someone is scary or not splendid, then he is not weary.
If there is someone who is both weary and splendid, then Ethan is thoughtful and Ethan is good.
All not splendid people are not scary.
If Arthur is not splendid, then John is shiny. | Ethan is not weary. | entailment |
Shelley is scary.
John is scary.
Ethan is shiny.
Shelley is good.
Mila is scary.
John is weary.
Mila is splendid.
Ethan is not weary.
Robert is not shiny.
Ethan is splendid.
Robert is not weary.
Arthur is not weary.If everyone is weary or thoughtful, then John is not splendid.
Isaac being not thoughtful implies that Shelley is scary and Robert is splendid.
If Robert is not scary or John is not splendid, then Arthur is shiny.
If there is someone who is either good or not splendid, then Shelley is not shiny.
John is weary if and only if Mila is not scary.
If Ethan is scary, then Shelley is not good and John is not thoughtful.
Someone is not scary and thoughtful if and only if he is not shiny.
If there is someone who is both not splendid and not weary, then Mila is not thoughtful.
If someone is scary or not splendid, then he is not weary.
If there is someone who is both weary and splendid, then Ethan is thoughtful and Ethan is good.
All not splendid people are not scary.
If Arthur is not splendid, then John is shiny. | Robert is good. | neutral |
Shelley is scary.
John is scary.
Ethan is shiny.
Shelley is good.
Mila is scary.
John is weary.
Mila is splendid.
Ethan is not weary.
Robert is not shiny.
Ethan is splendid.
Robert is not weary.
Arthur is not weary.If everyone is weary or thoughtful, then John is not splendid.
Isaac being not thoughtful implies that Shelley is scary and Robert is splendid.
If Robert is not scary or John is not splendid, then Arthur is shiny.
If there is someone who is either good or not splendid, then Shelley is not shiny.
John is weary if and only if Mila is not scary.
If Ethan is scary, then Shelley is not good and John is not thoughtful.
Someone is not scary and thoughtful if and only if he is not shiny.
If there is someone who is both not splendid and not weary, then Mila is not thoughtful.
If someone is scary or not splendid, then he is not weary.
If there is someone who is both weary and splendid, then Ethan is thoughtful and Ethan is good.
All not splendid people are not scary.
If Arthur is not splendid, then John is shiny. | Shelley is not thoughtful. | contradiction |
Shelley is scary.
John is scary.
Ethan is shiny.
Shelley is good.
Mila is scary.
John is weary.
Mila is splendid.
Ethan is not weary.
Robert is not shiny.
Ethan is splendid.
Robert is not weary.
Arthur is not weary.If everyone is weary or thoughtful, then John is not splendid.
Isaac being not thoughtful implies that Shelley is scary and Robert is splendid.
If Robert is not scary or John is not splendid, then Arthur is shiny.
If there is someone who is either good or not splendid, then Shelley is not shiny.
John is weary if and only if Mila is not scary.
If Ethan is scary, then Shelley is not good and John is not thoughtful.
Someone is not scary and thoughtful if and only if he is not shiny.
If there is someone who is both not splendid and not weary, then Mila is not thoughtful.
If someone is scary or not splendid, then he is not weary.
If there is someone who is both weary and splendid, then Ethan is thoughtful and Ethan is good.
All not splendid people are not scary.
If Arthur is not splendid, then John is shiny. | Arthur is weary. | contradiction |
Shelley is scary.
John is scary.
Ethan is shiny.
Shelley is good.
Mila is scary.
John is weary.
Mila is splendid.
Ethan is not weary.
Robert is not shiny.
Ethan is splendid.
Robert is not weary.
Arthur is not weary.If everyone is weary or thoughtful, then John is not splendid.
Isaac being not thoughtful implies that Shelley is scary and Robert is splendid.
If Robert is not scary or John is not splendid, then Arthur is shiny.
If there is someone who is either good or not splendid, then Shelley is not shiny.
John is weary if and only if Mila is not scary.
If Ethan is scary, then Shelley is not good and John is not thoughtful.
Someone is not scary and thoughtful if and only if he is not shiny.
If there is someone who is both not splendid and not weary, then Mila is not thoughtful.
If someone is scary or not splendid, then he is not weary.
If there is someone who is both weary and splendid, then Ethan is thoughtful and Ethan is good.
All not splendid people are not scary.
If Arthur is not splendid, then John is shiny. | Robert is not thoughtful. | contradiction |
Shelley is scary.
John is scary.
Ethan is shiny.
Shelley is good.
Mila is scary.
John is weary.
Mila is splendid.
Ethan is not weary.
Robert is not shiny.
Ethan is splendid.
Robert is not weary.
Arthur is not weary.If everyone is weary or thoughtful, then John is not splendid.
Isaac being not thoughtful implies that Shelley is scary and Robert is splendid.
If Robert is not scary or John is not splendid, then Arthur is shiny.
If there is someone who is either good or not splendid, then Shelley is not shiny.
John is weary if and only if Mila is not scary.
If Ethan is scary, then Shelley is not good and John is not thoughtful.
Someone is not scary and thoughtful if and only if he is not shiny.
If there is someone who is both not splendid and not weary, then Mila is not thoughtful.
If someone is scary or not splendid, then he is not weary.
If there is someone who is both weary and splendid, then Ethan is thoughtful and Ethan is good.
All not splendid people are not scary.
If Arthur is not splendid, then John is shiny. | Shelley is not weary. | entailment |
Shelley is scary.
John is scary.
Ethan is shiny.
Shelley is good.
Mila is scary.
John is weary.
Mila is splendid.
Ethan is not weary.
Robert is not shiny.
Ethan is splendid.
Robert is not weary.
Arthur is not weary.If everyone is weary or thoughtful, then John is not splendid.
Isaac being not thoughtful implies that Shelley is scary and Robert is splendid.
If Robert is not scary or John is not splendid, then Arthur is shiny.
If there is someone who is either good or not splendid, then Shelley is not shiny.
John is weary if and only if Mila is not scary.
If Ethan is scary, then Shelley is not good and John is not thoughtful.
Someone is not scary and thoughtful if and only if he is not shiny.
If there is someone who is both not splendid and not weary, then Mila is not thoughtful.
If someone is scary or not splendid, then he is not weary.
If there is someone who is both weary and splendid, then Ethan is thoughtful and Ethan is good.
All not splendid people are not scary.
If Arthur is not splendid, then John is shiny. | Shelley is not scary. | self_contradiction |
Shelley is scary.
John is scary.
Ethan is shiny.
Shelley is good.
Mila is scary.
John is weary.
Mila is splendid.
Ethan is not weary.
Robert is not shiny.
Ethan is splendid.
Robert is not weary.
Arthur is not weary.If everyone is weary or thoughtful, then John is not splendid.
Isaac being not thoughtful implies that Shelley is scary and Robert is splendid.
If Robert is not scary or John is not splendid, then Arthur is shiny.
If there is someone who is either good or not splendid, then Shelley is not shiny.
John is weary if and only if Mila is not scary.
If Ethan is scary, then Shelley is not good and John is not thoughtful.
Someone is not scary and thoughtful if and only if he is not shiny.
If there is someone who is both not splendid and not weary, then Mila is not thoughtful.
If someone is scary or not splendid, then he is not weary.
If there is someone who is both weary and splendid, then Ethan is thoughtful and Ethan is good.
All not splendid people are not scary.
If Arthur is not splendid, then John is shiny. | Robert is not good. | neutral |
Shelley is scary.
John is scary.
Ethan is shiny.
Shelley is good.
Mila is scary.
John is weary.
Mila is splendid.
Ethan is not weary.
Robert is not shiny.
Ethan is splendid.
Robert is not weary.
Arthur is not weary.If everyone is weary or thoughtful, then John is not splendid.
Isaac being not thoughtful implies that Shelley is scary and Robert is splendid.
If Robert is not scary or John is not splendid, then Arthur is shiny.
If there is someone who is either good or not splendid, then Shelley is not shiny.
John is weary if and only if Mila is not scary.
If Ethan is scary, then Shelley is not good and John is not thoughtful.
Someone is not scary and thoughtful if and only if he is not shiny.
If there is someone who is both not splendid and not weary, then Mila is not thoughtful.
If someone is scary or not splendid, then he is not weary.
If there is someone who is both weary and splendid, then Ethan is thoughtful and Ethan is good.
All not splendid people are not scary.
If Arthur is not splendid, then John is shiny. | Ethan is not shiny. | contradiction |
Shelley is scary.
John is scary.
Ethan is shiny.
Shelley is good.
Mila is scary.
John is weary.
Mila is splendid.
Ethan is not weary.
Robert is not shiny.
Ethan is splendid.
Robert is not weary.
Arthur is not weary.If everyone is weary or thoughtful, then John is not splendid.
Isaac being not thoughtful implies that Shelley is scary and Robert is splendid.
If Robert is not scary or John is not splendid, then Arthur is shiny.
If there is someone who is either good or not splendid, then Shelley is not shiny.
John is weary if and only if Mila is not scary.
If Ethan is scary, then Shelley is not good and John is not thoughtful.
Someone is not scary and thoughtful if and only if he is not shiny.
If there is someone who is both not splendid and not weary, then Mila is not thoughtful.
If someone is scary or not splendid, then he is not weary.
If there is someone who is both weary and splendid, then Ethan is thoughtful and Ethan is good.
All not splendid people are not scary.
If Arthur is not splendid, then John is shiny. | John is weary. | self_contradiction |
Shelley is scary.
John is scary.
Ethan is shiny.
Shelley is good.
Mila is scary.
John is weary.
Mila is splendid.
Ethan is not weary.
Robert is not shiny.
Ethan is splendid.
Robert is not weary.
Arthur is not weary.If everyone is weary or thoughtful, then John is not splendid.
Isaac being not thoughtful implies that Shelley is scary and Robert is splendid.
If Robert is not scary or John is not splendid, then Arthur is shiny.
If there is someone who is either good or not splendid, then Shelley is not shiny.
John is weary if and only if Mila is not scary.
If Ethan is scary, then Shelley is not good and John is not thoughtful.
Someone is not scary and thoughtful if and only if he is not shiny.
If there is someone who is both not splendid and not weary, then Mila is not thoughtful.
If someone is scary or not splendid, then he is not weary.
If there is someone who is both weary and splendid, then Ethan is thoughtful and Ethan is good.
All not splendid people are not scary.
If Arthur is not splendid, then John is shiny. | Shelley is not good. | contradiction |
Shelley is scary.
John is scary.
Ethan is shiny.
Shelley is good.
Mila is scary.
John is weary.
Mila is splendid.
Ethan is not weary.
Robert is not shiny.
Ethan is splendid.
Robert is not weary.
Arthur is not weary.If everyone is weary or thoughtful, then John is not splendid.
Isaac being not thoughtful implies that Shelley is scary and Robert is splendid.
If Robert is not scary or John is not splendid, then Arthur is shiny.
If there is someone who is either good or not splendid, then Shelley is not shiny.
John is weary if and only if Mila is not scary.
If Ethan is scary, then Shelley is not good and John is not thoughtful.
Someone is not scary and thoughtful if and only if he is not shiny.
If there is someone who is both not splendid and not weary, then Mila is not thoughtful.
If someone is scary or not splendid, then he is not weary.
If there is someone who is both weary and splendid, then Ethan is thoughtful and Ethan is good.
All not splendid people are not scary.
If Arthur is not splendid, then John is shiny. | Ethan is scary. | neutral |
Shelley is scary.
John is scary.
Ethan is shiny.
Shelley is good.
Mila is scary.
John is weary.
Mila is splendid.
Ethan is not weary.
Robert is not shiny.
Ethan is splendid.
Robert is not weary.
Arthur is not weary.If everyone is weary or thoughtful, then John is not splendid.
Isaac being not thoughtful implies that Shelley is scary and Robert is splendid.
If Robert is not scary or John is not splendid, then Arthur is shiny.
If there is someone who is either good or not splendid, then Shelley is not shiny.
John is weary if and only if Mila is not scary.
If Ethan is scary, then Shelley is not good and John is not thoughtful.
Someone is not scary and thoughtful if and only if he is not shiny.
If there is someone who is both not splendid and not weary, then Mila is not thoughtful.
If someone is scary or not splendid, then he is not weary.
If there is someone who is both weary and splendid, then Ethan is thoughtful and Ethan is good.
All not splendid people are not scary.
If Arthur is not splendid, then John is shiny. | Arthur is shiny. | entailment |
Shelley is scary.
John is scary.
Ethan is shiny.
Shelley is good.
Mila is scary.
John is weary.
Mila is splendid.
Ethan is not weary.
Robert is not shiny.
Ethan is splendid.
Robert is not weary.
Arthur is not weary.If everyone is weary or thoughtful, then John is not splendid.
Isaac being not thoughtful implies that Shelley is scary and Robert is splendid.
If Robert is not scary or John is not splendid, then Arthur is shiny.
If there is someone who is either good or not splendid, then Shelley is not shiny.
John is weary if and only if Mila is not scary.
If Ethan is scary, then Shelley is not good and John is not thoughtful.
Someone is not scary and thoughtful if and only if he is not shiny.
If there is someone who is both not splendid and not weary, then Mila is not thoughtful.
If someone is scary or not splendid, then he is not weary.
If there is someone who is both weary and splendid, then Ethan is thoughtful and Ethan is good.
All not splendid people are not scary.
If Arthur is not splendid, then John is shiny. | Arthur is splendid. | neutral |
Shelley is scary.
John is scary.
Ethan is shiny.
Shelley is good.
Mila is scary.
John is weary.
Mila is splendid.
Ethan is not weary.
Robert is not shiny.
Ethan is splendid.
Robert is not weary.
Arthur is not weary.If everyone is weary or thoughtful, then John is not splendid.
Isaac being not thoughtful implies that Shelley is scary and Robert is splendid.
If Robert is not scary or John is not splendid, then Arthur is shiny.
If there is someone who is either good or not splendid, then Shelley is not shiny.
John is weary if and only if Mila is not scary.
If Ethan is scary, then Shelley is not good and John is not thoughtful.
Someone is not scary and thoughtful if and only if he is not shiny.
If there is someone who is both not splendid and not weary, then Mila is not thoughtful.
If someone is scary or not splendid, then he is not weary.
If there is someone who is both weary and splendid, then Ethan is thoughtful and Ethan is good.
All not splendid people are not scary.
If Arthur is not splendid, then John is shiny. | Robert is splendid. | neutral |
Shelley is scary.
John is scary.
Ethan is shiny.
Shelley is good.
Mila is scary.
John is weary.
Mila is splendid.
Ethan is not weary.
Robert is not shiny.
Ethan is splendid.
Robert is not weary.
Arthur is not weary.If everyone is weary or thoughtful, then John is not splendid.
Isaac being not thoughtful implies that Shelley is scary and Robert is splendid.
If Robert is not scary or John is not splendid, then Arthur is shiny.
If there is someone who is either good or not splendid, then Shelley is not shiny.
John is weary if and only if Mila is not scary.
If Ethan is scary, then Shelley is not good and John is not thoughtful.
Someone is not scary and thoughtful if and only if he is not shiny.
If there is someone who is both not splendid and not weary, then Mila is not thoughtful.
If someone is scary or not splendid, then he is not weary.
If there is someone who is both weary and splendid, then Ethan is thoughtful and Ethan is good.
All not splendid people are not scary.
If Arthur is not splendid, then John is shiny. | Shelley is scary. | self_contradiction |
Shelley is scary.
John is scary.
Ethan is shiny.
Shelley is good.
Mila is scary.
John is weary.
Mila is splendid.
Ethan is not weary.
Robert is not shiny.
Ethan is splendid.
Robert is not weary.
Arthur is not weary.If everyone is weary or thoughtful, then John is not splendid.
Isaac being not thoughtful implies that Shelley is scary and Robert is splendid.
If Robert is not scary or John is not splendid, then Arthur is shiny.
If there is someone who is either good or not splendid, then Shelley is not shiny.
John is weary if and only if Mila is not scary.
If Ethan is scary, then Shelley is not good and John is not thoughtful.
Someone is not scary and thoughtful if and only if he is not shiny.
If there is someone who is both not splendid and not weary, then Mila is not thoughtful.
If someone is scary or not splendid, then he is not weary.
If there is someone who is both weary and splendid, then Ethan is thoughtful and Ethan is good.
All not splendid people are not scary.
If Arthur is not splendid, then John is shiny. | Mila is not scary. | self_contradiction |
Shelley is scary.
John is scary.
Ethan is shiny.
Shelley is good.
Mila is scary.
John is weary.
Mila is splendid.
Ethan is not weary.
Robert is not shiny.
Ethan is splendid.
Robert is not weary.
Arthur is not weary.If everyone is weary or thoughtful, then John is not splendid.
Isaac being not thoughtful implies that Shelley is scary and Robert is splendid.
If Robert is not scary or John is not splendid, then Arthur is shiny.
If there is someone who is either good or not splendid, then Shelley is not shiny.
John is weary if and only if Mila is not scary.
If Ethan is scary, then Shelley is not good and John is not thoughtful.
Someone is not scary and thoughtful if and only if he is not shiny.
If there is someone who is both not splendid and not weary, then Mila is not thoughtful.
If someone is scary or not splendid, then he is not weary.
If there is someone who is both weary and splendid, then Ethan is thoughtful and Ethan is good.
All not splendid people are not scary.
If Arthur is not splendid, then John is shiny. | John is not weary. | self_contradiction |
Shelley is scary.
John is scary.
Ethan is shiny.
Shelley is good.
Mila is scary.
John is weary.
Mila is splendid.
Ethan is not weary.
Robert is not shiny.
Ethan is splendid.
Robert is not weary.
Arthur is not weary.If everyone is weary or thoughtful, then John is not splendid.
Isaac being not thoughtful implies that Shelley is scary and Robert is splendid.
If Robert is not scary or John is not splendid, then Arthur is shiny.
If there is someone who is either good or not splendid, then Shelley is not shiny.
John is weary if and only if Mila is not scary.
If Ethan is scary, then Shelley is not good and John is not thoughtful.
Someone is not scary and thoughtful if and only if he is not shiny.
If there is someone who is both not splendid and not weary, then Mila is not thoughtful.
If someone is scary or not splendid, then he is not weary.
If there is someone who is both weary and splendid, then Ethan is thoughtful and Ethan is good.
All not splendid people are not scary.
If Arthur is not splendid, then John is shiny. | Shelley is thoughtful. | entailment |
Lauren is not neat.
Nicholas is sharp.
Joe is not historical.
Lauren is historical.
Amos is rare.
Norman is sharp.
Sterling is not rare.
Nicholas is neat.
Joe is not sharp.
Joe is curious.
Joe is rare.
Sterling is not neat.If there is at least one people who is both not rare and not neat, then Amos is curious.
If there is someone who is neat, then Sidney is historical and Nicholas is not generous.
If there is at least one people who is not curious, then Lauren is not neat.
If everyone is neat, then Norman is not sharp.
If someone is not historical or he is generous, then he is neat.
If there is at least one people who is not rare or historical, then Lauren is not sharp.
It can be concluded that Norman is not rare once knowing that Sterling is not sharp.
If someone is curious, then he is both historical and not sharp.
If someone is neat, then he is sharp.
If there is at least one people who is sharp, then Sterling is generous and Lauren is curious.
If there is at least one people who is not generous, then Amos is curious.
If Sidney is not neat, then Amos is rare and Sidney is not curious, and vice versa. | Sterling is sharp. | entailment |
Lauren is not neat.
Nicholas is sharp.
Joe is not historical.
Lauren is historical.
Amos is rare.
Norman is sharp.
Sterling is not rare.
Nicholas is neat.
Joe is not sharp.
Joe is curious.
Joe is rare.
Sterling is not neat.If there is at least one people who is both not rare and not neat, then Amos is curious.
If there is someone who is neat, then Sidney is historical and Nicholas is not generous.
If there is at least one people who is not curious, then Lauren is not neat.
If everyone is neat, then Norman is not sharp.
If someone is not historical or he is generous, then he is neat.
If there is at least one people who is not rare or historical, then Lauren is not sharp.
It can be concluded that Norman is not rare once knowing that Sterling is not sharp.
If someone is curious, then he is both historical and not sharp.
If someone is neat, then he is sharp.
If there is at least one people who is sharp, then Sterling is generous and Lauren is curious.
If there is at least one people who is not generous, then Amos is curious.
If Sidney is not neat, then Amos is rare and Sidney is not curious, and vice versa. | Sterling is neat. | self_contradiction |
Lauren is not neat.
Nicholas is sharp.
Joe is not historical.
Lauren is historical.
Amos is rare.
Norman is sharp.
Sterling is not rare.
Nicholas is neat.
Joe is not sharp.
Joe is curious.
Joe is rare.
Sterling is not neat.If there is at least one people who is both not rare and not neat, then Amos is curious.
If there is someone who is neat, then Sidney is historical and Nicholas is not generous.
If there is at least one people who is not curious, then Lauren is not neat.
If everyone is neat, then Norman is not sharp.
If someone is not historical or he is generous, then he is neat.
If there is at least one people who is not rare or historical, then Lauren is not sharp.
It can be concluded that Norman is not rare once knowing that Sterling is not sharp.
If someone is curious, then he is both historical and not sharp.
If someone is neat, then he is sharp.
If there is at least one people who is sharp, then Sterling is generous and Lauren is curious.
If there is at least one people who is not generous, then Amos is curious.
If Sidney is not neat, then Amos is rare and Sidney is not curious, and vice versa. | Joe is sharp. | self_contradiction |
Lauren is not neat.
Nicholas is sharp.
Joe is not historical.
Lauren is historical.
Amos is rare.
Norman is sharp.
Sterling is not rare.
Nicholas is neat.
Joe is not sharp.
Joe is curious.
Joe is rare.
Sterling is not neat.If there is at least one people who is both not rare and not neat, then Amos is curious.
If there is someone who is neat, then Sidney is historical and Nicholas is not generous.
If there is at least one people who is not curious, then Lauren is not neat.
If everyone is neat, then Norman is not sharp.
If someone is not historical or he is generous, then he is neat.
If there is at least one people who is not rare or historical, then Lauren is not sharp.
It can be concluded that Norman is not rare once knowing that Sterling is not sharp.
If someone is curious, then he is both historical and not sharp.
If someone is neat, then he is sharp.
If there is at least one people who is sharp, then Sterling is generous and Lauren is curious.
If there is at least one people who is not generous, then Amos is curious.
If Sidney is not neat, then Amos is rare and Sidney is not curious, and vice versa. | Nicholas is sharp. | entailment |
Lauren is not neat.
Nicholas is sharp.
Joe is not historical.
Lauren is historical.
Amos is rare.
Norman is sharp.
Sterling is not rare.
Nicholas is neat.
Joe is not sharp.
Joe is curious.
Joe is rare.
Sterling is not neat.If there is at least one people who is both not rare and not neat, then Amos is curious.
If there is someone who is neat, then Sidney is historical and Nicholas is not generous.
If there is at least one people who is not curious, then Lauren is not neat.
If everyone is neat, then Norman is not sharp.
If someone is not historical or he is generous, then he is neat.
If there is at least one people who is not rare or historical, then Lauren is not sharp.
It can be concluded that Norman is not rare once knowing that Sterling is not sharp.
If someone is curious, then he is both historical and not sharp.
If someone is neat, then he is sharp.
If there is at least one people who is sharp, then Sterling is generous and Lauren is curious.
If there is at least one people who is not generous, then Amos is curious.
If Sidney is not neat, then Amos is rare and Sidney is not curious, and vice versa. | Sterling is not neat. | self_contradiction |
Lauren is not neat.
Nicholas is sharp.
Joe is not historical.
Lauren is historical.
Amos is rare.
Norman is sharp.
Sterling is not rare.
Nicholas is neat.
Joe is not sharp.
Joe is curious.
Joe is rare.
Sterling is not neat.If there is at least one people who is both not rare and not neat, then Amos is curious.
If there is someone who is neat, then Sidney is historical and Nicholas is not generous.
If there is at least one people who is not curious, then Lauren is not neat.
If everyone is neat, then Norman is not sharp.
If someone is not historical or he is generous, then he is neat.
If there is at least one people who is not rare or historical, then Lauren is not sharp.
It can be concluded that Norman is not rare once knowing that Sterling is not sharp.
If someone is curious, then he is both historical and not sharp.
If someone is neat, then he is sharp.
If there is at least one people who is sharp, then Sterling is generous and Lauren is curious.
If there is at least one people who is not generous, then Amos is curious.
If Sidney is not neat, then Amos is rare and Sidney is not curious, and vice versa. | Amos is not generous. | neutral |
Lauren is not neat.
Nicholas is sharp.
Joe is not historical.
Lauren is historical.
Amos is rare.
Norman is sharp.
Sterling is not rare.
Nicholas is neat.
Joe is not sharp.
Joe is curious.
Joe is rare.
Sterling is not neat.If there is at least one people who is both not rare and not neat, then Amos is curious.
If there is someone who is neat, then Sidney is historical and Nicholas is not generous.
If there is at least one people who is not curious, then Lauren is not neat.
If everyone is neat, then Norman is not sharp.
If someone is not historical or he is generous, then he is neat.
If there is at least one people who is not rare or historical, then Lauren is not sharp.
It can be concluded that Norman is not rare once knowing that Sterling is not sharp.
If someone is curious, then he is both historical and not sharp.
If someone is neat, then he is sharp.
If there is at least one people who is sharp, then Sterling is generous and Lauren is curious.
If there is at least one people who is not generous, then Amos is curious.
If Sidney is not neat, then Amos is rare and Sidney is not curious, and vice versa. | Norman is neat. | neutral |
Lauren is not neat.
Nicholas is sharp.
Joe is not historical.
Lauren is historical.
Amos is rare.
Norman is sharp.
Sterling is not rare.
Nicholas is neat.
Joe is not sharp.
Joe is curious.
Joe is rare.
Sterling is not neat.If there is at least one people who is both not rare and not neat, then Amos is curious.
If there is someone who is neat, then Sidney is historical and Nicholas is not generous.
If there is at least one people who is not curious, then Lauren is not neat.
If everyone is neat, then Norman is not sharp.
If someone is not historical or he is generous, then he is neat.
If there is at least one people who is not rare or historical, then Lauren is not sharp.
It can be concluded that Norman is not rare once knowing that Sterling is not sharp.
If someone is curious, then he is both historical and not sharp.
If someone is neat, then he is sharp.
If there is at least one people who is sharp, then Sterling is generous and Lauren is curious.
If there is at least one people who is not generous, then Amos is curious.
If Sidney is not neat, then Amos is rare and Sidney is not curious, and vice versa. | Joe is not rare. | contradiction |
Lauren is not neat.
Nicholas is sharp.
Joe is not historical.
Lauren is historical.
Amos is rare.
Norman is sharp.
Sterling is not rare.
Nicholas is neat.
Joe is not sharp.
Joe is curious.
Joe is rare.
Sterling is not neat.If there is at least one people who is both not rare and not neat, then Amos is curious.
If there is someone who is neat, then Sidney is historical and Nicholas is not generous.
If there is at least one people who is not curious, then Lauren is not neat.
If everyone is neat, then Norman is not sharp.
If someone is not historical or he is generous, then he is neat.
If there is at least one people who is not rare or historical, then Lauren is not sharp.
It can be concluded that Norman is not rare once knowing that Sterling is not sharp.
If someone is curious, then he is both historical and not sharp.
If someone is neat, then he is sharp.
If there is at least one people who is sharp, then Sterling is generous and Lauren is curious.
If there is at least one people who is not generous, then Amos is curious.
If Sidney is not neat, then Amos is rare and Sidney is not curious, and vice versa. | Norman is not neat. | neutral |
Lauren is not neat.
Nicholas is sharp.
Joe is not historical.
Lauren is historical.
Amos is rare.
Norman is sharp.
Sterling is not rare.
Nicholas is neat.
Joe is not sharp.
Joe is curious.
Joe is rare.
Sterling is not neat.If there is at least one people who is both not rare and not neat, then Amos is curious.
If there is someone who is neat, then Sidney is historical and Nicholas is not generous.
If there is at least one people who is not curious, then Lauren is not neat.
If everyone is neat, then Norman is not sharp.
If someone is not historical or he is generous, then he is neat.
If there is at least one people who is not rare or historical, then Lauren is not sharp.
It can be concluded that Norman is not rare once knowing that Sterling is not sharp.
If someone is curious, then he is both historical and not sharp.
If someone is neat, then he is sharp.
If there is at least one people who is sharp, then Sterling is generous and Lauren is curious.
If there is at least one people who is not generous, then Amos is curious.
If Sidney is not neat, then Amos is rare and Sidney is not curious, and vice versa. | Norman is historical. | neutral |
Lauren is not neat.
Nicholas is sharp.
Joe is not historical.
Lauren is historical.
Amos is rare.
Norman is sharp.
Sterling is not rare.
Nicholas is neat.
Joe is not sharp.
Joe is curious.
Joe is rare.
Sterling is not neat.If there is at least one people who is both not rare and not neat, then Amos is curious.
If there is someone who is neat, then Sidney is historical and Nicholas is not generous.
If there is at least one people who is not curious, then Lauren is not neat.
If everyone is neat, then Norman is not sharp.
If someone is not historical or he is generous, then he is neat.
If there is at least one people who is not rare or historical, then Lauren is not sharp.
It can be concluded that Norman is not rare once knowing that Sterling is not sharp.
If someone is curious, then he is both historical and not sharp.
If someone is neat, then he is sharp.
If there is at least one people who is sharp, then Sterling is generous and Lauren is curious.
If there is at least one people who is not generous, then Amos is curious.
If Sidney is not neat, then Amos is rare and Sidney is not curious, and vice versa. | Joe is rare. | entailment |
Lauren is not neat.
Nicholas is sharp.
Joe is not historical.
Lauren is historical.
Amos is rare.
Norman is sharp.
Sterling is not rare.
Nicholas is neat.
Joe is not sharp.
Joe is curious.
Joe is rare.
Sterling is not neat.If there is at least one people who is both not rare and not neat, then Amos is curious.
If there is someone who is neat, then Sidney is historical and Nicholas is not generous.
If there is at least one people who is not curious, then Lauren is not neat.
If everyone is neat, then Norman is not sharp.
If someone is not historical or he is generous, then he is neat.
If there is at least one people who is not rare or historical, then Lauren is not sharp.
It can be concluded that Norman is not rare once knowing that Sterling is not sharp.
If someone is curious, then he is both historical and not sharp.
If someone is neat, then he is sharp.
If there is at least one people who is sharp, then Sterling is generous and Lauren is curious.
If there is at least one people who is not generous, then Amos is curious.
If Sidney is not neat, then Amos is rare and Sidney is not curious, and vice versa. | Amos is not historical. | contradiction |
Lauren is not neat.
Nicholas is sharp.
Joe is not historical.
Lauren is historical.
Amos is rare.
Norman is sharp.
Sterling is not rare.
Nicholas is neat.
Joe is not sharp.
Joe is curious.
Joe is rare.
Sterling is not neat.If there is at least one people who is both not rare and not neat, then Amos is curious.
If there is someone who is neat, then Sidney is historical and Nicholas is not generous.
If there is at least one people who is not curious, then Lauren is not neat.
If everyone is neat, then Norman is not sharp.
If someone is not historical or he is generous, then he is neat.
If there is at least one people who is not rare or historical, then Lauren is not sharp.
It can be concluded that Norman is not rare once knowing that Sterling is not sharp.
If someone is curious, then he is both historical and not sharp.
If someone is neat, then he is sharp.
If there is at least one people who is sharp, then Sterling is generous and Lauren is curious.
If there is at least one people who is not generous, then Amos is curious.
If Sidney is not neat, then Amos is rare and Sidney is not curious, and vice versa. | Joe is historical. | self_contradiction |
Lauren is not neat.
Nicholas is sharp.
Joe is not historical.
Lauren is historical.
Amos is rare.
Norman is sharp.
Sterling is not rare.
Nicholas is neat.
Joe is not sharp.
Joe is curious.
Joe is rare.
Sterling is not neat.If there is at least one people who is both not rare and not neat, then Amos is curious.
If there is someone who is neat, then Sidney is historical and Nicholas is not generous.
If there is at least one people who is not curious, then Lauren is not neat.
If everyone is neat, then Norman is not sharp.
If someone is not historical or he is generous, then he is neat.
If there is at least one people who is not rare or historical, then Lauren is not sharp.
It can be concluded that Norman is not rare once knowing that Sterling is not sharp.
If someone is curious, then he is both historical and not sharp.
If someone is neat, then he is sharp.
If there is at least one people who is sharp, then Sterling is generous and Lauren is curious.
If there is at least one people who is not generous, then Amos is curious.
If Sidney is not neat, then Amos is rare and Sidney is not curious, and vice versa. | Sterling is not rare. | entailment |
Lauren is not neat.
Nicholas is sharp.
Joe is not historical.
Lauren is historical.
Amos is rare.
Norman is sharp.
Sterling is not rare.
Nicholas is neat.
Joe is not sharp.
Joe is curious.
Joe is rare.
Sterling is not neat.If there is at least one people who is both not rare and not neat, then Amos is curious.
If there is someone who is neat, then Sidney is historical and Nicholas is not generous.
If there is at least one people who is not curious, then Lauren is not neat.
If everyone is neat, then Norman is not sharp.
If someone is not historical or he is generous, then he is neat.
If there is at least one people who is not rare or historical, then Lauren is not sharp.
It can be concluded that Norman is not rare once knowing that Sterling is not sharp.
If someone is curious, then he is both historical and not sharp.
If someone is neat, then he is sharp.
If there is at least one people who is sharp, then Sterling is generous and Lauren is curious.
If there is at least one people who is not generous, then Amos is curious.
If Sidney is not neat, then Amos is rare and Sidney is not curious, and vice versa. | Amos is neat. | neutral |
Lauren is not neat.
Nicholas is sharp.
Joe is not historical.
Lauren is historical.
Amos is rare.
Norman is sharp.
Sterling is not rare.
Nicholas is neat.
Joe is not sharp.
Joe is curious.
Joe is rare.
Sterling is not neat.If there is at least one people who is both not rare and not neat, then Amos is curious.
If there is someone who is neat, then Sidney is historical and Nicholas is not generous.
If there is at least one people who is not curious, then Lauren is not neat.
If everyone is neat, then Norman is not sharp.
If someone is not historical or he is generous, then he is neat.
If there is at least one people who is not rare or historical, then Lauren is not sharp.
It can be concluded that Norman is not rare once knowing that Sterling is not sharp.
If someone is curious, then he is both historical and not sharp.
If someone is neat, then he is sharp.
If there is at least one people who is sharp, then Sterling is generous and Lauren is curious.
If there is at least one people who is not generous, then Amos is curious.
If Sidney is not neat, then Amos is rare and Sidney is not curious, and vice versa. | Sidney is historical. | entailment |
Lauren is not neat.
Nicholas is sharp.
Joe is not historical.
Lauren is historical.
Amos is rare.
Norman is sharp.
Sterling is not rare.
Nicholas is neat.
Joe is not sharp.
Joe is curious.
Joe is rare.
Sterling is not neat.If there is at least one people who is both not rare and not neat, then Amos is curious.
If there is someone who is neat, then Sidney is historical and Nicholas is not generous.
If there is at least one people who is not curious, then Lauren is not neat.
If everyone is neat, then Norman is not sharp.
If someone is not historical or he is generous, then he is neat.
If there is at least one people who is not rare or historical, then Lauren is not sharp.
It can be concluded that Norman is not rare once knowing that Sterling is not sharp.
If someone is curious, then he is both historical and not sharp.
If someone is neat, then he is sharp.
If there is at least one people who is sharp, then Sterling is generous and Lauren is curious.
If there is at least one people who is not generous, then Amos is curious.
If Sidney is not neat, then Amos is rare and Sidney is not curious, and vice versa. | Nicholas is generous. | contradiction |
Lauren is not neat.
Nicholas is sharp.
Joe is not historical.
Lauren is historical.
Amos is rare.
Norman is sharp.
Sterling is not rare.
Nicholas is neat.
Joe is not sharp.
Joe is curious.
Joe is rare.
Sterling is not neat.If there is at least one people who is both not rare and not neat, then Amos is curious.
If there is someone who is neat, then Sidney is historical and Nicholas is not generous.
If there is at least one people who is not curious, then Lauren is not neat.
If everyone is neat, then Norman is not sharp.
If someone is not historical or he is generous, then he is neat.
If there is at least one people who is not rare or historical, then Lauren is not sharp.
It can be concluded that Norman is not rare once knowing that Sterling is not sharp.
If someone is curious, then he is both historical and not sharp.
If someone is neat, then he is sharp.
If there is at least one people who is sharp, then Sterling is generous and Lauren is curious.
If there is at least one people who is not generous, then Amos is curious.
If Sidney is not neat, then Amos is rare and Sidney is not curious, and vice versa. | Joe is not curious. | contradiction |
Lauren is not neat.
Nicholas is sharp.
Joe is not historical.
Lauren is historical.
Amos is rare.
Norman is sharp.
Sterling is not rare.
Nicholas is neat.
Joe is not sharp.
Joe is curious.
Joe is rare.
Sterling is not neat.If there is at least one people who is both not rare and not neat, then Amos is curious.
If there is someone who is neat, then Sidney is historical and Nicholas is not generous.
If there is at least one people who is not curious, then Lauren is not neat.
If everyone is neat, then Norman is not sharp.
If someone is not historical or he is generous, then he is neat.
If there is at least one people who is not rare or historical, then Lauren is not sharp.
It can be concluded that Norman is not rare once knowing that Sterling is not sharp.
If someone is curious, then he is both historical and not sharp.
If someone is neat, then he is sharp.
If there is at least one people who is sharp, then Sterling is generous and Lauren is curious.
If there is at least one people who is not generous, then Amos is curious.
If Sidney is not neat, then Amos is rare and Sidney is not curious, and vice versa. | Joe is not sharp. | self_contradiction |
Lauren is not neat.
Nicholas is sharp.
Joe is not historical.
Lauren is historical.
Amos is rare.
Norman is sharp.
Sterling is not rare.
Nicholas is neat.
Joe is not sharp.
Joe is curious.
Joe is rare.
Sterling is not neat.If there is at least one people who is both not rare and not neat, then Amos is curious.
If there is someone who is neat, then Sidney is historical and Nicholas is not generous.
If there is at least one people who is not curious, then Lauren is not neat.
If everyone is neat, then Norman is not sharp.
If someone is not historical or he is generous, then he is neat.
If there is at least one people who is not rare or historical, then Lauren is not sharp.
It can be concluded that Norman is not rare once knowing that Sterling is not sharp.
If someone is curious, then he is both historical and not sharp.
If someone is neat, then he is sharp.
If there is at least one people who is sharp, then Sterling is generous and Lauren is curious.
If there is at least one people who is not generous, then Amos is curious.
If Sidney is not neat, then Amos is rare and Sidney is not curious, and vice versa. | Nicholas is not sharp. | contradiction |
Randolph is big.
Kathryn is attentive.
Ron is not unable.
Katrina is rich.
Katrina is attentive.
Ron is not attentive.
Sidney is not serious.
Ron is not good.
Sherman is not attentive.
Ron is big.
Pierce is not unable.
Pierce is not serious.If there is someone who is serious, then Pierce is not rich and Ron is not big.
It can be concluded that Ron is serious once knowing that Ron is good.
If someone who is big is also attentive, then he is not good.
Someone who is not unable is always not big.
Someone who is not serious is always both attentive and not big.
If someone is good, then he is unable.
If Ron is serious and Kathryn is not attentive, then Randolph is not unable.
It can be concluded that Ron is not unable once knowing that Randolph is not attentive or Sherman is rich.
Someone who is both not unable and not big is always rich.
If all people are good or not rich, then Sherman is not big.
Randolph being not attentive implies that Randolph is not big and Sherman is not good.
Someone who is eithor not serious or not attentive is always good. | Randolph is rich. | neutral |
Randolph is big.
Kathryn is attentive.
Ron is not unable.
Katrina is rich.
Katrina is attentive.
Ron is not attentive.
Sidney is not serious.
Ron is not good.
Sherman is not attentive.
Ron is big.
Pierce is not unable.
Pierce is not serious.If there is someone who is serious, then Pierce is not rich and Ron is not big.
It can be concluded that Ron is serious once knowing that Ron is good.
If someone who is big is also attentive, then he is not good.
Someone who is not unable is always not big.
Someone who is not serious is always both attentive and not big.
If someone is good, then he is unable.
If Ron is serious and Kathryn is not attentive, then Randolph is not unable.
It can be concluded that Ron is not unable once knowing that Randolph is not attentive or Sherman is rich.
Someone who is both not unable and not big is always rich.
If all people are good or not rich, then Sherman is not big.
Randolph being not attentive implies that Randolph is not big and Sherman is not good.
Someone who is eithor not serious or not attentive is always good. | Katrina is serious. | neutral |
Randolph is big.
Kathryn is attentive.
Ron is not unable.
Katrina is rich.
Katrina is attentive.
Ron is not attentive.
Sidney is not serious.
Ron is not good.
Sherman is not attentive.
Ron is big.
Pierce is not unable.
Pierce is not serious.If there is someone who is serious, then Pierce is not rich and Ron is not big.
It can be concluded that Ron is serious once knowing that Ron is good.
If someone who is big is also attentive, then he is not good.
Someone who is not unable is always not big.
Someone who is not serious is always both attentive and not big.
If someone is good, then he is unable.
If Ron is serious and Kathryn is not attentive, then Randolph is not unable.
It can be concluded that Ron is not unable once knowing that Randolph is not attentive or Sherman is rich.
Someone who is both not unable and not big is always rich.
If all people are good or not rich, then Sherman is not big.
Randolph being not attentive implies that Randolph is not big and Sherman is not good.
Someone who is eithor not serious or not attentive is always good. | Katrina is not rich. | contradiction |
Randolph is big.
Kathryn is attentive.
Ron is not unable.
Katrina is rich.
Katrina is attentive.
Ron is not attentive.
Sidney is not serious.
Ron is not good.
Sherman is not attentive.
Ron is big.
Pierce is not unable.
Pierce is not serious.If there is someone who is serious, then Pierce is not rich and Ron is not big.
It can be concluded that Ron is serious once knowing that Ron is good.
If someone who is big is also attentive, then he is not good.
Someone who is not unable is always not big.
Someone who is not serious is always both attentive and not big.
If someone is good, then he is unable.
If Ron is serious and Kathryn is not attentive, then Randolph is not unable.
It can be concluded that Ron is not unable once knowing that Randolph is not attentive or Sherman is rich.
Someone who is both not unable and not big is always rich.
If all people are good or not rich, then Sherman is not big.
Randolph being not attentive implies that Randolph is not big and Sherman is not good.
Someone who is eithor not serious or not attentive is always good. | Pierce is not good. | contradiction |
Randolph is big.
Kathryn is attentive.
Ron is not unable.
Katrina is rich.
Katrina is attentive.
Ron is not attentive.
Sidney is not serious.
Ron is not good.
Sherman is not attentive.
Ron is big.
Pierce is not unable.
Pierce is not serious.If there is someone who is serious, then Pierce is not rich and Ron is not big.
It can be concluded that Ron is serious once knowing that Ron is good.
If someone who is big is also attentive, then he is not good.
Someone who is not unable is always not big.
Someone who is not serious is always both attentive and not big.
If someone is good, then he is unable.
If Ron is serious and Kathryn is not attentive, then Randolph is not unable.
It can be concluded that Ron is not unable once knowing that Randolph is not attentive or Sherman is rich.
Someone who is both not unable and not big is always rich.
If all people are good or not rich, then Sherman is not big.
Randolph being not attentive implies that Randolph is not big and Sherman is not good.
Someone who is eithor not serious or not attentive is always good. | Sidney is big. | contradiction |
Randolph is big.
Kathryn is attentive.
Ron is not unable.
Katrina is rich.
Katrina is attentive.
Ron is not attentive.
Sidney is not serious.
Ron is not good.
Sherman is not attentive.
Ron is big.
Pierce is not unable.
Pierce is not serious.If there is someone who is serious, then Pierce is not rich and Ron is not big.
It can be concluded that Ron is serious once knowing that Ron is good.
If someone who is big is also attentive, then he is not good.
Someone who is not unable is always not big.
Someone who is not serious is always both attentive and not big.
If someone is good, then he is unable.
If Ron is serious and Kathryn is not attentive, then Randolph is not unable.
It can be concluded that Ron is not unable once knowing that Randolph is not attentive or Sherman is rich.
Someone who is both not unable and not big is always rich.
If all people are good or not rich, then Sherman is not big.
Randolph being not attentive implies that Randolph is not big and Sherman is not good.
Someone who is eithor not serious or not attentive is always good. | Sidney is good. | entailment |
Randolph is big.
Kathryn is attentive.
Ron is not unable.
Katrina is rich.
Katrina is attentive.
Ron is not attentive.
Sidney is not serious.
Ron is not good.
Sherman is not attentive.
Ron is big.
Pierce is not unable.
Pierce is not serious.If there is someone who is serious, then Pierce is not rich and Ron is not big.
It can be concluded that Ron is serious once knowing that Ron is good.
If someone who is big is also attentive, then he is not good.
Someone who is not unable is always not big.
Someone who is not serious is always both attentive and not big.
If someone is good, then he is unable.
If Ron is serious and Kathryn is not attentive, then Randolph is not unable.
It can be concluded that Ron is not unable once knowing that Randolph is not attentive or Sherman is rich.
Someone who is both not unable and not big is always rich.
If all people are good or not rich, then Sherman is not big.
Randolph being not attentive implies that Randolph is not big and Sherman is not good.
Someone who is eithor not serious or not attentive is always good. | Pierce is rich. | self_contradiction |
Randolph is big.
Kathryn is attentive.
Ron is not unable.
Katrina is rich.
Katrina is attentive.
Ron is not attentive.
Sidney is not serious.
Ron is not good.
Sherman is not attentive.
Ron is big.
Pierce is not unable.
Pierce is not serious.If there is someone who is serious, then Pierce is not rich and Ron is not big.
It can be concluded that Ron is serious once knowing that Ron is good.
If someone who is big is also attentive, then he is not good.
Someone who is not unable is always not big.
Someone who is not serious is always both attentive and not big.
If someone is good, then he is unable.
If Ron is serious and Kathryn is not attentive, then Randolph is not unable.
It can be concluded that Ron is not unable once knowing that Randolph is not attentive or Sherman is rich.
Someone who is both not unable and not big is always rich.
If all people are good or not rich, then Sherman is not big.
Randolph being not attentive implies that Randolph is not big and Sherman is not good.
Someone who is eithor not serious or not attentive is always good. | Randolph is not good. | neutral |
Randolph is big.
Kathryn is attentive.
Ron is not unable.
Katrina is rich.
Katrina is attentive.
Ron is not attentive.
Sidney is not serious.
Ron is not good.
Sherman is not attentive.
Ron is big.
Pierce is not unable.
Pierce is not serious.If there is someone who is serious, then Pierce is not rich and Ron is not big.
It can be concluded that Ron is serious once knowing that Ron is good.
If someone who is big is also attentive, then he is not good.
Someone who is not unable is always not big.
Someone who is not serious is always both attentive and not big.
If someone is good, then he is unable.
If Ron is serious and Kathryn is not attentive, then Randolph is not unable.
It can be concluded that Ron is not unable once knowing that Randolph is not attentive or Sherman is rich.
Someone who is both not unable and not big is always rich.
If all people are good or not rich, then Sherman is not big.
Randolph being not attentive implies that Randolph is not big and Sherman is not good.
Someone who is eithor not serious or not attentive is always good. | Pierce is unable. | self_contradiction |
Randolph is big.
Kathryn is attentive.
Ron is not unable.
Katrina is rich.
Katrina is attentive.
Ron is not attentive.
Sidney is not serious.
Ron is not good.
Sherman is not attentive.
Ron is big.
Pierce is not unable.
Pierce is not serious.If there is someone who is serious, then Pierce is not rich and Ron is not big.
It can be concluded that Ron is serious once knowing that Ron is good.
If someone who is big is also attentive, then he is not good.
Someone who is not unable is always not big.
Someone who is not serious is always both attentive and not big.
If someone is good, then he is unable.
If Ron is serious and Kathryn is not attentive, then Randolph is not unable.
It can be concluded that Ron is not unable once knowing that Randolph is not attentive or Sherman is rich.
Someone who is both not unable and not big is always rich.
If all people are good or not rich, then Sherman is not big.
Randolph being not attentive implies that Randolph is not big and Sherman is not good.
Someone who is eithor not serious or not attentive is always good. | Ron is big. | self_contradiction |
Randolph is big.
Kathryn is attentive.
Ron is not unable.
Katrina is rich.
Katrina is attentive.
Ron is not attentive.
Sidney is not serious.
Ron is not good.
Sherman is not attentive.
Ron is big.
Pierce is not unable.
Pierce is not serious.If there is someone who is serious, then Pierce is not rich and Ron is not big.
It can be concluded that Ron is serious once knowing that Ron is good.
If someone who is big is also attentive, then he is not good.
Someone who is not unable is always not big.
Someone who is not serious is always both attentive and not big.
If someone is good, then he is unable.
If Ron is serious and Kathryn is not attentive, then Randolph is not unable.
It can be concluded that Ron is not unable once knowing that Randolph is not attentive or Sherman is rich.
Someone who is both not unable and not big is always rich.
If all people are good or not rich, then Sherman is not big.
Randolph being not attentive implies that Randolph is not big and Sherman is not good.
Someone who is eithor not serious or not attentive is always good. | Randolph is not rich. | neutral |
Randolph is big.
Kathryn is attentive.
Ron is not unable.
Katrina is rich.
Katrina is attentive.
Ron is not attentive.
Sidney is not serious.
Ron is not good.
Sherman is not attentive.
Ron is big.
Pierce is not unable.
Pierce is not serious.If there is someone who is serious, then Pierce is not rich and Ron is not big.
It can be concluded that Ron is serious once knowing that Ron is good.
If someone who is big is also attentive, then he is not good.
Someone who is not unable is always not big.
Someone who is not serious is always both attentive and not big.
If someone is good, then he is unable.
If Ron is serious and Kathryn is not attentive, then Randolph is not unable.
It can be concluded that Ron is not unable once knowing that Randolph is not attentive or Sherman is rich.
Someone who is both not unable and not big is always rich.
If all people are good or not rich, then Sherman is not big.
Randolph being not attentive implies that Randolph is not big and Sherman is not good.
Someone who is eithor not serious or not attentive is always good. | Pierce is not big. | entailment |
Randolph is big.
Kathryn is attentive.
Ron is not unable.
Katrina is rich.
Katrina is attentive.
Ron is not attentive.
Sidney is not serious.
Ron is not good.
Sherman is not attentive.
Ron is big.
Pierce is not unable.
Pierce is not serious.If there is someone who is serious, then Pierce is not rich and Ron is not big.
It can be concluded that Ron is serious once knowing that Ron is good.
If someone who is big is also attentive, then he is not good.
Someone who is not unable is always not big.
Someone who is not serious is always both attentive and not big.
If someone is good, then he is unable.
If Ron is serious and Kathryn is not attentive, then Randolph is not unable.
It can be concluded that Ron is not unable once knowing that Randolph is not attentive or Sherman is rich.
Someone who is both not unable and not big is always rich.
If all people are good or not rich, then Sherman is not big.
Randolph being not attentive implies that Randolph is not big and Sherman is not good.
Someone who is eithor not serious or not attentive is always good. | Katrina is rich. | entailment |
Randolph is big.
Kathryn is attentive.
Ron is not unable.
Katrina is rich.
Katrina is attentive.
Ron is not attentive.
Sidney is not serious.
Ron is not good.
Sherman is not attentive.
Ron is big.
Pierce is not unable.
Pierce is not serious.If there is someone who is serious, then Pierce is not rich and Ron is not big.
It can be concluded that Ron is serious once knowing that Ron is good.
If someone who is big is also attentive, then he is not good.
Someone who is not unable is always not big.
Someone who is not serious is always both attentive and not big.
If someone is good, then he is unable.
If Ron is serious and Kathryn is not attentive, then Randolph is not unable.
It can be concluded that Ron is not unable once knowing that Randolph is not attentive or Sherman is rich.
Someone who is both not unable and not big is always rich.
If all people are good or not rich, then Sherman is not big.
Randolph being not attentive implies that Randolph is not big and Sherman is not good.
Someone who is eithor not serious or not attentive is always good. | Ron is not big. | self_contradiction |
Randolph is big.
Kathryn is attentive.
Ron is not unable.
Katrina is rich.
Katrina is attentive.
Ron is not attentive.
Sidney is not serious.
Ron is not good.
Sherman is not attentive.
Ron is big.
Pierce is not unable.
Pierce is not serious.If there is someone who is serious, then Pierce is not rich and Ron is not big.
It can be concluded that Ron is serious once knowing that Ron is good.
If someone who is big is also attentive, then he is not good.
Someone who is not unable is always not big.
Someone who is not serious is always both attentive and not big.
If someone is good, then he is unable.
If Ron is serious and Kathryn is not attentive, then Randolph is not unable.
It can be concluded that Ron is not unable once knowing that Randolph is not attentive or Sherman is rich.
Someone who is both not unable and not big is always rich.
If all people are good or not rich, then Sherman is not big.
Randolph being not attentive implies that Randolph is not big and Sherman is not good.
Someone who is eithor not serious or not attentive is always good. | Sidney is not attentive. | contradiction |
Randolph is big.
Kathryn is attentive.
Ron is not unable.
Katrina is rich.
Katrina is attentive.
Ron is not attentive.
Sidney is not serious.
Ron is not good.
Sherman is not attentive.
Ron is big.
Pierce is not unable.
Pierce is not serious.If there is someone who is serious, then Pierce is not rich and Ron is not big.
It can be concluded that Ron is serious once knowing that Ron is good.
If someone who is big is also attentive, then he is not good.
Someone who is not unable is always not big.
Someone who is not serious is always both attentive and not big.
If someone is good, then he is unable.
If Ron is serious and Kathryn is not attentive, then Randolph is not unable.
It can be concluded that Ron is not unable once knowing that Randolph is not attentive or Sherman is rich.
Someone who is both not unable and not big is always rich.
If all people are good or not rich, then Sherman is not big.
Randolph being not attentive implies that Randolph is not big and Sherman is not good.
Someone who is eithor not serious or not attentive is always good. | Ron is not unable. | self_contradiction |
Randolph is big.
Kathryn is attentive.
Ron is not unable.
Katrina is rich.
Katrina is attentive.
Ron is not attentive.
Sidney is not serious.
Ron is not good.
Sherman is not attentive.
Ron is big.
Pierce is not unable.
Pierce is not serious.If there is someone who is serious, then Pierce is not rich and Ron is not big.
It can be concluded that Ron is serious once knowing that Ron is good.
If someone who is big is also attentive, then he is not good.
Someone who is not unable is always not big.
Someone who is not serious is always both attentive and not big.
If someone is good, then he is unable.
If Ron is serious and Kathryn is not attentive, then Randolph is not unable.
It can be concluded that Ron is not unable once knowing that Randolph is not attentive or Sherman is rich.
Someone who is both not unable and not big is always rich.
If all people are good or not rich, then Sherman is not big.
Randolph being not attentive implies that Randolph is not big and Sherman is not good.
Someone who is eithor not serious or not attentive is always good. | Ron is not rich. | contradiction |
Randolph is big.
Kathryn is attentive.
Ron is not unable.
Katrina is rich.
Katrina is attentive.
Ron is not attentive.
Sidney is not serious.
Ron is not good.
Sherman is not attentive.
Ron is big.
Pierce is not unable.
Pierce is not serious.If there is someone who is serious, then Pierce is not rich and Ron is not big.
It can be concluded that Ron is serious once knowing that Ron is good.
If someone who is big is also attentive, then he is not good.
Someone who is not unable is always not big.
Someone who is not serious is always both attentive and not big.
If someone is good, then he is unable.
If Ron is serious and Kathryn is not attentive, then Randolph is not unable.
It can be concluded that Ron is not unable once knowing that Randolph is not attentive or Sherman is rich.
Someone who is both not unable and not big is always rich.
If all people are good or not rich, then Sherman is not big.
Randolph being not attentive implies that Randolph is not big and Sherman is not good.
Someone who is eithor not serious or not attentive is always good. | Katrina is attentive. | entailment |
Randolph is big.
Kathryn is attentive.
Ron is not unable.
Katrina is rich.
Katrina is attentive.
Ron is not attentive.
Sidney is not serious.
Ron is not good.
Sherman is not attentive.
Ron is big.
Pierce is not unable.
Pierce is not serious.If there is someone who is serious, then Pierce is not rich and Ron is not big.
It can be concluded that Ron is serious once knowing that Ron is good.
If someone who is big is also attentive, then he is not good.
Someone who is not unable is always not big.
Someone who is not serious is always both attentive and not big.
If someone is good, then he is unable.
If Ron is serious and Kathryn is not attentive, then Randolph is not unable.
It can be concluded that Ron is not unable once knowing that Randolph is not attentive or Sherman is rich.
Someone who is both not unable and not big is always rich.
If all people are good or not rich, then Sherman is not big.
Randolph being not attentive implies that Randolph is not big and Sherman is not good.
Someone who is eithor not serious or not attentive is always good. | Sidney is not rich. | neutral |
Randolph is big.
Kathryn is attentive.
Ron is not unable.
Katrina is rich.
Katrina is attentive.
Ron is not attentive.
Sidney is not serious.
Ron is not good.
Sherman is not attentive.
Ron is big.
Pierce is not unable.
Pierce is not serious.If there is someone who is serious, then Pierce is not rich and Ron is not big.
It can be concluded that Ron is serious once knowing that Ron is good.
If someone who is big is also attentive, then he is not good.
Someone who is not unable is always not big.
Someone who is not serious is always both attentive and not big.
If someone is good, then he is unable.
If Ron is serious and Kathryn is not attentive, then Randolph is not unable.
It can be concluded that Ron is not unable once knowing that Randolph is not attentive or Sherman is rich.
Someone who is both not unable and not big is always rich.
If all people are good or not rich, then Sherman is not big.
Randolph being not attentive implies that Randolph is not big and Sherman is not good.
Someone who is eithor not serious or not attentive is always good. | Sherman is not attentive. | entailment |
Isabel is superior.
Morris is sufficient.
Joshua is sufficient.
Gloria is not condemned.
Morris is depressed.
Joshua is global.
Rosie is blue-eyed.
Eunice is not superior.
Joshua is superior.
Isabel is not global.
Eunice is sufficient.
Rosie is depressed.Morris being not condemned implies that Isabel is blue-eyed.
Someone being both not condemned and not superior is equivalent to being not sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is sufficient, then Morris is not global.
If there is at least one people who is depressed, then Rosie is not sufficient.
If there is someone who is not condemned, then James is sufficient and Morris is global.
If there is at least one people who is global, then Morris is blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both not condemned and not blue-eyed, then Isabel is global.
If someone is blue-eyed, then he is global.
Eunice is not global if and only if Joshua is not blue-eyed.
If Eunice is not depressed, then Eunice is superior and James is blue-eyed, and vice versa.
Someone is not blue-eyed and not superior if and only if he is global.
Gloria being not blue-eyed or James being superior implies that Joshua is not sufficient. | James is condemned. | neutral |
Isabel is superior.
Morris is sufficient.
Joshua is sufficient.
Gloria is not condemned.
Morris is depressed.
Joshua is global.
Rosie is blue-eyed.
Eunice is not superior.
Joshua is superior.
Isabel is not global.
Eunice is sufficient.
Rosie is depressed.Morris being not condemned implies that Isabel is blue-eyed.
Someone being both not condemned and not superior is equivalent to being not sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is sufficient, then Morris is not global.
If there is at least one people who is depressed, then Rosie is not sufficient.
If there is someone who is not condemned, then James is sufficient and Morris is global.
If there is at least one people who is global, then Morris is blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both not condemned and not blue-eyed, then Isabel is global.
If someone is blue-eyed, then he is global.
Eunice is not global if and only if Joshua is not blue-eyed.
If Eunice is not depressed, then Eunice is superior and James is blue-eyed, and vice versa.
Someone is not blue-eyed and not superior if and only if he is global.
Gloria being not blue-eyed or James being superior implies that Joshua is not sufficient. | Isabel is depressed. | neutral |
Isabel is superior.
Morris is sufficient.
Joshua is sufficient.
Gloria is not condemned.
Morris is depressed.
Joshua is global.
Rosie is blue-eyed.
Eunice is not superior.
Joshua is superior.
Isabel is not global.
Eunice is sufficient.
Rosie is depressed.Morris being not condemned implies that Isabel is blue-eyed.
Someone being both not condemned and not superior is equivalent to being not sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is sufficient, then Morris is not global.
If there is at least one people who is depressed, then Rosie is not sufficient.
If there is someone who is not condemned, then James is sufficient and Morris is global.
If there is at least one people who is global, then Morris is blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both not condemned and not blue-eyed, then Isabel is global.
If someone is blue-eyed, then he is global.
Eunice is not global if and only if Joshua is not blue-eyed.
If Eunice is not depressed, then Eunice is superior and James is blue-eyed, and vice versa.
Someone is not blue-eyed and not superior if and only if he is global.
Gloria being not blue-eyed or James being superior implies that Joshua is not sufficient. | Isabel is not superior. | self_contradiction |
Isabel is superior.
Morris is sufficient.
Joshua is sufficient.
Gloria is not condemned.
Morris is depressed.
Joshua is global.
Rosie is blue-eyed.
Eunice is not superior.
Joshua is superior.
Isabel is not global.
Eunice is sufficient.
Rosie is depressed.Morris being not condemned implies that Isabel is blue-eyed.
Someone being both not condemned and not superior is equivalent to being not sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is sufficient, then Morris is not global.
If there is at least one people who is depressed, then Rosie is not sufficient.
If there is someone who is not condemned, then James is sufficient and Morris is global.
If there is at least one people who is global, then Morris is blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both not condemned and not blue-eyed, then Isabel is global.
If someone is blue-eyed, then he is global.
Eunice is not global if and only if Joshua is not blue-eyed.
If Eunice is not depressed, then Eunice is superior and James is blue-eyed, and vice versa.
Someone is not blue-eyed and not superior if and only if he is global.
Gloria being not blue-eyed or James being superior implies that Joshua is not sufficient. | Morris is not global. | self_contradiction |
Isabel is superior.
Morris is sufficient.
Joshua is sufficient.
Gloria is not condemned.
Morris is depressed.
Joshua is global.
Rosie is blue-eyed.
Eunice is not superior.
Joshua is superior.
Isabel is not global.
Eunice is sufficient.
Rosie is depressed.Morris being not condemned implies that Isabel is blue-eyed.
Someone being both not condemned and not superior is equivalent to being not sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is sufficient, then Morris is not global.
If there is at least one people who is depressed, then Rosie is not sufficient.
If there is someone who is not condemned, then James is sufficient and Morris is global.
If there is at least one people who is global, then Morris is blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both not condemned and not blue-eyed, then Isabel is global.
If someone is blue-eyed, then he is global.
Eunice is not global if and only if Joshua is not blue-eyed.
If Eunice is not depressed, then Eunice is superior and James is blue-eyed, and vice versa.
Someone is not blue-eyed and not superior if and only if he is global.
Gloria being not blue-eyed or James being superior implies that Joshua is not sufficient. | Eunice is not global. | entailment |
Isabel is superior.
Morris is sufficient.
Joshua is sufficient.
Gloria is not condemned.
Morris is depressed.
Joshua is global.
Rosie is blue-eyed.
Eunice is not superior.
Joshua is superior.
Isabel is not global.
Eunice is sufficient.
Rosie is depressed.Morris being not condemned implies that Isabel is blue-eyed.
Someone being both not condemned and not superior is equivalent to being not sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is sufficient, then Morris is not global.
If there is at least one people who is depressed, then Rosie is not sufficient.
If there is someone who is not condemned, then James is sufficient and Morris is global.
If there is at least one people who is global, then Morris is blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both not condemned and not blue-eyed, then Isabel is global.
If someone is blue-eyed, then he is global.
Eunice is not global if and only if Joshua is not blue-eyed.
If Eunice is not depressed, then Eunice is superior and James is blue-eyed, and vice versa.
Someone is not blue-eyed and not superior if and only if he is global.
Gloria being not blue-eyed or James being superior implies that Joshua is not sufficient. | Morris is blue-eyed. | self_contradiction |
Isabel is superior.
Morris is sufficient.
Joshua is sufficient.
Gloria is not condemned.
Morris is depressed.
Joshua is global.
Rosie is blue-eyed.
Eunice is not superior.
Joshua is superior.
Isabel is not global.
Eunice is sufficient.
Rosie is depressed.Morris being not condemned implies that Isabel is blue-eyed.
Someone being both not condemned and not superior is equivalent to being not sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is sufficient, then Morris is not global.
If there is at least one people who is depressed, then Rosie is not sufficient.
If there is someone who is not condemned, then James is sufficient and Morris is global.
If there is at least one people who is global, then Morris is blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both not condemned and not blue-eyed, then Isabel is global.
If someone is blue-eyed, then he is global.
Eunice is not global if and only if Joshua is not blue-eyed.
If Eunice is not depressed, then Eunice is superior and James is blue-eyed, and vice versa.
Someone is not blue-eyed and not superior if and only if he is global.
Gloria being not blue-eyed or James being superior implies that Joshua is not sufficient. | Gloria is condemned. | contradiction |
Isabel is superior.
Morris is sufficient.
Joshua is sufficient.
Gloria is not condemned.
Morris is depressed.
Joshua is global.
Rosie is blue-eyed.
Eunice is not superior.
Joshua is superior.
Isabel is not global.
Eunice is sufficient.
Rosie is depressed.Morris being not condemned implies that Isabel is blue-eyed.
Someone being both not condemned and not superior is equivalent to being not sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is sufficient, then Morris is not global.
If there is at least one people who is depressed, then Rosie is not sufficient.
If there is someone who is not condemned, then James is sufficient and Morris is global.
If there is at least one people who is global, then Morris is blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both not condemned and not blue-eyed, then Isabel is global.
If someone is blue-eyed, then he is global.
Eunice is not global if and only if Joshua is not blue-eyed.
If Eunice is not depressed, then Eunice is superior and James is blue-eyed, and vice versa.
Someone is not blue-eyed and not superior if and only if he is global.
Gloria being not blue-eyed or James being superior implies that Joshua is not sufficient. | Rosie is not sufficient. | entailment |
Isabel is superior.
Morris is sufficient.
Joshua is sufficient.
Gloria is not condemned.
Morris is depressed.
Joshua is global.
Rosie is blue-eyed.
Eunice is not superior.
Joshua is superior.
Isabel is not global.
Eunice is sufficient.
Rosie is depressed.Morris being not condemned implies that Isabel is blue-eyed.
Someone being both not condemned and not superior is equivalent to being not sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is sufficient, then Morris is not global.
If there is at least one people who is depressed, then Rosie is not sufficient.
If there is someone who is not condemned, then James is sufficient and Morris is global.
If there is at least one people who is global, then Morris is blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both not condemned and not blue-eyed, then Isabel is global.
If someone is blue-eyed, then he is global.
Eunice is not global if and only if Joshua is not blue-eyed.
If Eunice is not depressed, then Eunice is superior and James is blue-eyed, and vice versa.
Someone is not blue-eyed and not superior if and only if he is global.
Gloria being not blue-eyed or James being superior implies that Joshua is not sufficient. | James is not depressed. | neutral |
Isabel is superior.
Morris is sufficient.
Joshua is sufficient.
Gloria is not condemned.
Morris is depressed.
Joshua is global.
Rosie is blue-eyed.
Eunice is not superior.
Joshua is superior.
Isabel is not global.
Eunice is sufficient.
Rosie is depressed.Morris being not condemned implies that Isabel is blue-eyed.
Someone being both not condemned and not superior is equivalent to being not sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is sufficient, then Morris is not global.
If there is at least one people who is depressed, then Rosie is not sufficient.
If there is someone who is not condemned, then James is sufficient and Morris is global.
If there is at least one people who is global, then Morris is blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both not condemned and not blue-eyed, then Isabel is global.
If someone is blue-eyed, then he is global.
Eunice is not global if and only if Joshua is not blue-eyed.
If Eunice is not depressed, then Eunice is superior and James is blue-eyed, and vice versa.
Someone is not blue-eyed and not superior if and only if he is global.
Gloria being not blue-eyed or James being superior implies that Joshua is not sufficient. | Morris is not condemned. | neutral |
Isabel is superior.
Morris is sufficient.
Joshua is sufficient.
Gloria is not condemned.
Morris is depressed.
Joshua is global.
Rosie is blue-eyed.
Eunice is not superior.
Joshua is superior.
Isabel is not global.
Eunice is sufficient.
Rosie is depressed.Morris being not condemned implies that Isabel is blue-eyed.
Someone being both not condemned and not superior is equivalent to being not sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is sufficient, then Morris is not global.
If there is at least one people who is depressed, then Rosie is not sufficient.
If there is someone who is not condemned, then James is sufficient and Morris is global.
If there is at least one people who is global, then Morris is blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both not condemned and not blue-eyed, then Isabel is global.
If someone is blue-eyed, then he is global.
Eunice is not global if and only if Joshua is not blue-eyed.
If Eunice is not depressed, then Eunice is superior and James is blue-eyed, and vice versa.
Someone is not blue-eyed and not superior if and only if he is global.
Gloria being not blue-eyed or James being superior implies that Joshua is not sufficient. | Gloria is not condemned. | entailment |
Isabel is superior.
Morris is sufficient.
Joshua is sufficient.
Gloria is not condemned.
Morris is depressed.
Joshua is global.
Rosie is blue-eyed.
Eunice is not superior.
Joshua is superior.
Isabel is not global.
Eunice is sufficient.
Rosie is depressed.Morris being not condemned implies that Isabel is blue-eyed.
Someone being both not condemned and not superior is equivalent to being not sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is sufficient, then Morris is not global.
If there is at least one people who is depressed, then Rosie is not sufficient.
If there is someone who is not condemned, then James is sufficient and Morris is global.
If there is at least one people who is global, then Morris is blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both not condemned and not blue-eyed, then Isabel is global.
If someone is blue-eyed, then he is global.
Eunice is not global if and only if Joshua is not blue-eyed.
If Eunice is not depressed, then Eunice is superior and James is blue-eyed, and vice versa.
Someone is not blue-eyed and not superior if and only if he is global.
Gloria being not blue-eyed or James being superior implies that Joshua is not sufficient. | Eunice is not sufficient. | contradiction |
Isabel is superior.
Morris is sufficient.
Joshua is sufficient.
Gloria is not condemned.
Morris is depressed.
Joshua is global.
Rosie is blue-eyed.
Eunice is not superior.
Joshua is superior.
Isabel is not global.
Eunice is sufficient.
Rosie is depressed.Morris being not condemned implies that Isabel is blue-eyed.
Someone being both not condemned and not superior is equivalent to being not sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is sufficient, then Morris is not global.
If there is at least one people who is depressed, then Rosie is not sufficient.
If there is someone who is not condemned, then James is sufficient and Morris is global.
If there is at least one people who is global, then Morris is blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both not condemned and not blue-eyed, then Isabel is global.
If someone is blue-eyed, then he is global.
Eunice is not global if and only if Joshua is not blue-eyed.
If Eunice is not depressed, then Eunice is superior and James is blue-eyed, and vice versa.
Someone is not blue-eyed and not superior if and only if he is global.
Gloria being not blue-eyed or James being superior implies that Joshua is not sufficient. | Rosie is blue-eyed. | self_contradiction |
Isabel is superior.
Morris is sufficient.
Joshua is sufficient.
Gloria is not condemned.
Morris is depressed.
Joshua is global.
Rosie is blue-eyed.
Eunice is not superior.
Joshua is superior.
Isabel is not global.
Eunice is sufficient.
Rosie is depressed.Morris being not condemned implies that Isabel is blue-eyed.
Someone being both not condemned and not superior is equivalent to being not sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is sufficient, then Morris is not global.
If there is at least one people who is depressed, then Rosie is not sufficient.
If there is someone who is not condemned, then James is sufficient and Morris is global.
If there is at least one people who is global, then Morris is blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both not condemned and not blue-eyed, then Isabel is global.
If someone is blue-eyed, then he is global.
Eunice is not global if and only if Joshua is not blue-eyed.
If Eunice is not depressed, then Eunice is superior and James is blue-eyed, and vice versa.
Someone is not blue-eyed and not superior if and only if he is global.
Gloria being not blue-eyed or James being superior implies that Joshua is not sufficient. | Eunice is not superior. | entailment |
Isabel is superior.
Morris is sufficient.
Joshua is sufficient.
Gloria is not condemned.
Morris is depressed.
Joshua is global.
Rosie is blue-eyed.
Eunice is not superior.
Joshua is superior.
Isabel is not global.
Eunice is sufficient.
Rosie is depressed.Morris being not condemned implies that Isabel is blue-eyed.
Someone being both not condemned and not superior is equivalent to being not sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is sufficient, then Morris is not global.
If there is at least one people who is depressed, then Rosie is not sufficient.
If there is someone who is not condemned, then James is sufficient and Morris is global.
If there is at least one people who is global, then Morris is blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both not condemned and not blue-eyed, then Isabel is global.
If someone is blue-eyed, then he is global.
Eunice is not global if and only if Joshua is not blue-eyed.
If Eunice is not depressed, then Eunice is superior and James is blue-eyed, and vice versa.
Someone is not blue-eyed and not superior if and only if he is global.
Gloria being not blue-eyed or James being superior implies that Joshua is not sufficient. | Eunice is sufficient. | entailment |
Isabel is superior.
Morris is sufficient.
Joshua is sufficient.
Gloria is not condemned.
Morris is depressed.
Joshua is global.
Rosie is blue-eyed.
Eunice is not superior.
Joshua is superior.
Isabel is not global.
Eunice is sufficient.
Rosie is depressed.Morris being not condemned implies that Isabel is blue-eyed.
Someone being both not condemned and not superior is equivalent to being not sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is sufficient, then Morris is not global.
If there is at least one people who is depressed, then Rosie is not sufficient.
If there is someone who is not condemned, then James is sufficient and Morris is global.
If there is at least one people who is global, then Morris is blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both not condemned and not blue-eyed, then Isabel is global.
If someone is blue-eyed, then he is global.
Eunice is not global if and only if Joshua is not blue-eyed.
If Eunice is not depressed, then Eunice is superior and James is blue-eyed, and vice versa.
Someone is not blue-eyed and not superior if and only if he is global.
Gloria being not blue-eyed or James being superior implies that Joshua is not sufficient. | Joshua is not superior. | self_contradiction |
Isabel is superior.
Morris is sufficient.
Joshua is sufficient.
Gloria is not condemned.
Morris is depressed.
Joshua is global.
Rosie is blue-eyed.
Eunice is not superior.
Joshua is superior.
Isabel is not global.
Eunice is sufficient.
Rosie is depressed.Morris being not condemned implies that Isabel is blue-eyed.
Someone being both not condemned and not superior is equivalent to being not sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is sufficient, then Morris is not global.
If there is at least one people who is depressed, then Rosie is not sufficient.
If there is someone who is not condemned, then James is sufficient and Morris is global.
If there is at least one people who is global, then Morris is blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both not condemned and not blue-eyed, then Isabel is global.
If someone is blue-eyed, then he is global.
Eunice is not global if and only if Joshua is not blue-eyed.
If Eunice is not depressed, then Eunice is superior and James is blue-eyed, and vice versa.
Someone is not blue-eyed and not superior if and only if he is global.
Gloria being not blue-eyed or James being superior implies that Joshua is not sufficient. | Rosie is superior. | contradiction |
Isabel is superior.
Morris is sufficient.
Joshua is sufficient.
Gloria is not condemned.
Morris is depressed.
Joshua is global.
Rosie is blue-eyed.
Eunice is not superior.
Joshua is superior.
Isabel is not global.
Eunice is sufficient.
Rosie is depressed.Morris being not condemned implies that Isabel is blue-eyed.
Someone being both not condemned and not superior is equivalent to being not sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is sufficient, then Morris is not global.
If there is at least one people who is depressed, then Rosie is not sufficient.
If there is someone who is not condemned, then James is sufficient and Morris is global.
If there is at least one people who is global, then Morris is blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both not condemned and not blue-eyed, then Isabel is global.
If someone is blue-eyed, then he is global.
Eunice is not global if and only if Joshua is not blue-eyed.
If Eunice is not depressed, then Eunice is superior and James is blue-eyed, and vice versa.
Someone is not blue-eyed and not superior if and only if he is global.
Gloria being not blue-eyed or James being superior implies that Joshua is not sufficient. | Rosie is not global. | contradiction |
Isabel is superior.
Morris is sufficient.
Joshua is sufficient.
Gloria is not condemned.
Morris is depressed.
Joshua is global.
Rosie is blue-eyed.
Eunice is not superior.
Joshua is superior.
Isabel is not global.
Eunice is sufficient.
Rosie is depressed.Morris being not condemned implies that Isabel is blue-eyed.
Someone being both not condemned and not superior is equivalent to being not sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is sufficient, then Morris is not global.
If there is at least one people who is depressed, then Rosie is not sufficient.
If there is someone who is not condemned, then James is sufficient and Morris is global.
If there is at least one people who is global, then Morris is blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both not condemned and not blue-eyed, then Isabel is global.
If someone is blue-eyed, then he is global.
Eunice is not global if and only if Joshua is not blue-eyed.
If Eunice is not depressed, then Eunice is superior and James is blue-eyed, and vice versa.
Someone is not blue-eyed and not superior if and only if he is global.
Gloria being not blue-eyed or James being superior implies that Joshua is not sufficient. | James is not sufficient. | contradiction |
Isabel is superior.
Morris is sufficient.
Joshua is sufficient.
Gloria is not condemned.
Morris is depressed.
Joshua is global.
Rosie is blue-eyed.
Eunice is not superior.
Joshua is superior.
Isabel is not global.
Eunice is sufficient.
Rosie is depressed.Morris being not condemned implies that Isabel is blue-eyed.
Someone being both not condemned and not superior is equivalent to being not sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is sufficient, then Morris is not global.
If there is at least one people who is depressed, then Rosie is not sufficient.
If there is someone who is not condemned, then James is sufficient and Morris is global.
If there is at least one people who is global, then Morris is blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both not condemned and not blue-eyed, then Isabel is global.
If someone is blue-eyed, then he is global.
Eunice is not global if and only if Joshua is not blue-eyed.
If Eunice is not depressed, then Eunice is superior and James is blue-eyed, and vice versa.
Someone is not blue-eyed and not superior if and only if he is global.
Gloria being not blue-eyed or James being superior implies that Joshua is not sufficient. | Gloria is sufficient. | neutral |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.