dataset_id
int64 0
5.47k
| email_body
stringlengths 800
9.73k
|
|---|---|
1,400 |
Subject: Re: LA DWP
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/1449.
=====================================
All I know is they say it to our traders. The rationale is to keep power in
California.
From: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON on 11/06/2000 04:25 PM CST
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
To: Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: [email protected], James D Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON, John M
Forney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tom Briggs/NA/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: LA DWP
Is this something they've said publicly? If so, have they provided any
rationale? Thanks.
Mary Hain@ECT
11/06/2000 02:36 PM
To: [email protected], Tom Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: John M Forney/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: LA DWP
The Los Angeles Department of Water and Power is refusing to sell outside of
California for less than $250. This is diminishing liquidity in the market.
However, we can't call FERC and complain because munis are not regulated by
FERC. Here is an example of something we should be bringing to NW
congressional members re why FERC should regulate the munis.
=====================================
|
1,401 |
Subject: Re: Memorial Day
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/4647.
=====================================
sounds good.
"Scott Laughlin" <[email protected]>
05/16/2001 02:18 PM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Re: Memorial Day
Cameron will definately have to work, but I could certainly come up and
help. If she'll let me, that is.... I agree that tidying up is in order.
It's starting to look overgrown and unused, so I'll do anything I can to
help. Let me break the news to Cameron and I'll get back to you...
>From: [email protected]
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Memorial Day
>Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 13:06:53 -0500
>
>The place (outside) is a mess and needs some clean-up (e.g., get all that
>old wood out of the front yard, whack down the weeds). Possible for you
>guys to come up next Wednesday night and we can do a quick clean up on
>Thursday. I'm going to try to hire a hauling company to help us and haul
>it away. If Cameron has to work are you available?
>
>Best,
>Jeff
>
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
=====================================
|
1,402 |
Subject: RE: Draft letter to full Commission re GIR PD
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/4223.
=====================================
??????? I just received a notice of reassignment of the Gas Strategy OII from
ALJ Andrea Biren to ALJ John Wong.? I wanted to also mention on the
conference call that the PD did not have ALJ Biren's name on it, which led me
to wonder how much of the PD was her writing.??
-----Original Message-----
From: MBD [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, December 01, 2000 4:55 PM
To: 'Pocta, Robert M.'; 'Counihan, Rick'; '[email protected]';
John Burkholder; Mike Alexander; Craig Chancellor; Colin Cushnie; Jeff
Dasovich; MBD; Paul Amirault; Doug Porter; Tom Beach; 'Amirault, Paul';
'Craig Chancellor, Calpine'; 'How-Downing, Lindsey'; 'Phil Davies, WGSI
Calgary'
Subject: Draft letter to full Commission re GIR PD
Here is the draft letter. We received no input from anyone.? So this
represents our best shot.? Please edit mercilessly.?? Please share only with
CSA signatories.? Please comment by email or in person or by phone at the
socalgas meeting, where I will distribute the letter and seek support.
Thanks, Mike Day
?<<X18828.DOC>>
=====================================
|
1,403 |
Subject: Alpine Discount Ski Tickets!!!!! Deadline Extended!!
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/2873.
=====================================
YOU CAN STILL BUY ALPINE DISCOUNT SKI TICKETS!!!
Tell your friends and family!? The more we get the better!
PUT YOUR CHECK IN MY MBA02 MAILBOX BY THIS FRIDAY(11/3).?
$42 each - good all year, and transferrable!
Any questions please see below, or ask me.
Thanks,
Matt
Redwoods@Haas is organizing discounted ski tickets at Squaw Valley and Alpine
Meadows.?
This is a great way to save some money if you plan on skiing this year.?
Both Squaw and Alpine are PREMIERE North Lake Tahoe ski resorts.
Squaw Valley Tickets cost $45 each and include night skiing. (Regular Price
$54)
Make checks payable to Will Birdsey and leave them in my MBA02 mailbox.?
Deadline Friday, October 27th!
Alpine Meadows Tickets cost $42 each.? (Regular Price $52)
Make checks payable to Matt Hawe and leave them in his MBA02 mailbox.?
Deadline Friday, October 27th!
Tickets are good all ski season (including holidays and weekends)
Tickets are transferrable
Buy as many (or as few) tickets as you want
See you on the slopes!
Matthew Hawe
Haas MBA Candidate '02
=====================================
|
1,404 |
Subject: California Energy Commission Grant Program
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/12326.
=====================================
SVMG Energy Committee Members and Liaison Representatives:
The CEC recently launched the Innovative Peak Load Reduction
Program which provides grants for reducing peak electrical demand.
Supporting the SVMG Energy Policy, this program will pay up to $250
per kW, and up to 75% of the costs for projects that achieve load
reduction between the hours of 2:00PM-6:00PM, June through
September. Attached is a flyer that gives an overview of the
program and the scheduled seminars that explain the grant program.
A seminar is being conducted on Tuesday, June 26, at the San
Francisco Airport Holiday Inn to explain the program and the
application process. There is no charge for the seminar and a full
complementary breakfast will be provided. The seminar starts at
7:00AM and is about an hour.
Take advantage of this opportunity to get a state grant to help defer
the cost of energy efficiency projects.
Thank you for your consideration.
Gary B. Clifford
XENERGY
(See attached file: Peak Load Program Flyers_fax.pdf)
- Peak Load Program Flyers_fax.pdf
=====================================
|
1,405 |
Subject: FW: Siting Committee Ruling (99-DIST-GEN(2))
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/distributed_generation/29.
=====================================
Just got this and am forwarding in case Scott didn't already send it to you.
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Tomashefsky [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, December 16, 1999 3:03 PM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Siting Committee Ruling (99-DIST-GEN(2))
Attached is the unofficial version of a Siting Committee Ruling signed this
afternoon in 99-DIST-GEN(2). The ruling established the basic framework by
which the Commission will develop recommended interconnection rules
affecting DG proponents and IOUs. In the interest of getting this note out
today, I am using the e-mail list generated from R.98-12-015, rather than
the new list. I will ensure that future correspondence use the R.99-10-025
service list.
The official version will be placed in the mail tomorrow and also posted on
our website. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me via
e-mail or by phone.
Scott Tomashefsky
California Energy Commission
(916) 654-4896
[email protected]
- Siting Committee Order 1.doc
=====================================
|
1,406 |
Subject: Re: CPUC v. El Paso, Days 8 and 9
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/2927.
=====================================
Kim, I had asked Randy to have you put Jeff Dasovich on the distribution list
for these reports, but it must have slipped his mind. Jeff's e-mail address
is [email protected]. Would appreciate it if you would send him future
reports. Hopefully, there won't be many more!!
Thanks.
"Kimberly Curry" <[email protected]> on 05/24/2001 06:38:59 PM
To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
cc: "Randall Rich" <[email protected]>
Subject: CPUC v. El Paso, Days 8 and 9
All:
Attached is a brief memo describing the hearing. One notable event that came
out of today's hearing is that Bill Wise will take the stand tomorrow
afternoon to answer questions from the Judge (and possibly other parties) on
the February 14 presentation regarding the EPME acquisition of the EPNG
capacity.
Kimberly A. Curry
Bracewell & Patterson, L.L.P
2000 K Street, N.W.
Suite 500
(202) 828-7623 (phone)
(202) 857-2107 (fax)
[email protected]
- 0142965.doc
=====================================
|
1,407 |
Subject: Presentation for K. Lay to CEOs re: Proposal K. Lay's Been Making
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/12259.
=====================================
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 05/10/2001 12:32 PM -----
Jeff Dasovich
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
05/10/2001 12:20 PM
To: Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, [email protected], James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul
Kaufman/Enron@EnronXGate, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan M Landwehr/NA/Enron@Enron, Jennifer
Thome/NA/Enron@Enron, Michael Tribolet/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:
Subject: Presentation for K. Lay to CEOs re: Proposal K. Lay's Been Making
in California
FYI. Ken Lay asked to have the pitch that he's been making California be
quickly put into a few power point slides for use in meetings he's having
this week at the gathering of the Business Council (back East) with a group
of California CEOs (e.g., Sun, Chevron, Amgen, Bechtel and others). This is
the version that we gave to Lay's office; he may have modified it. Will
check with Rosalee to get the final and distribute that version if changes
were made.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
1,408 |
Subject: Protest Procedures for U.S. Enron Facilities to ALL SENIOR
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/613.
=====================================
FYI
Protest procedures!
----- Forwarded by Cristina Zavala/SF/ECT on 07/12/2001 05:28 PM -----
David Parquet 07/05/2001 03:48 PM To: April Hrach/SF/ECT@ECT, Cristina Zavala/SF/ECT@ECT, Michael McDonald/SF/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Protest Procedures for U.S. Enron Facilities to ALL SENIOR MANAGEMENT
----- Forwarded by David Parquet/SF/ECT on 07/05/2001 03:47 PM -----
Mark Palmer- (Public Relations)@ENRON Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON 06/14/2001 09:40 PM To: CORP Officers cc: Subject: Protest Procedures for U.S. Enron Facilities to ALL SENIOR MANAGEMENT
In the past few months, there have been protests at various Enron offices. These protests have been primarily by consumer and other advocacy groups representing different energy interests. Attached are security and public relations procedures to help you manage a protest should one arise at your facility. Feel free to provide this document to leaders in your organization as appropriate.
Thank You.
Mark Palmer
Vice President, Corporate Communications
713 853-4738
=====================================
|
1,409 |
Subject: RE: PG&E and Lodi Gas
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/2268.
=====================================
Not all, but some. I'll give you a ring to discuss more.
-----Original Message-----
From: Miller, Stephanie
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 11:38 AM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: FW: PG&E and Lodi Gas
Importance: High
Just confirming that we (ENA) aren't planning to use all of our "chits" on this issue..
Please call if you have any questions.
Regards,
Stephanie
-----Original Message-----
From: Wong, Michael
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 2:47 PM
To: Mcdonald, Michael; Calvert, Gray; Miller, Stephanie
Subject: PG&E and Lodi Gas
Importance: High
I spoke with Jeff Dasovich and got an update of discussions with PG&E. He received an email yesterday from Dan Richards (Steve Kean equivalent at PG&E) and he is getting a contact for us to interface with at PG&E on this issue. Dan indicated that he would try and have a name and number to Jeff by early next week, so Jeff will keep us posted. If you have any questions, comments, etc. give me a call and I'll track it down.
Michael Wong
Enron North America
(w) 415-782-7808
(c) 415-297-9664
=====================================
|
1,410 |
Subject: California ISO Ten-minute market and Cal PX Price Cap
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/880.
=====================================
See the email from Donna Fulton below. Donna joined Government Affairs a
couple of months ago. She was with Enron - GPG for 12 years doing gas
regulatory work, so she's an expert in FERC matters but is getting up to
speed on electric matters. Please feel free to call her in addition to Joe
or me on FERC regulatory matters.
Also, the Cal PX filed at FERC on August 22 its proposal to implement a $350
price cap. Interventions are due on September 12. A copy of the filing
(Imaging Format) and FERC's notice are attached.
We should discuss what position we want to take, if any, in response to the
Cal PX's filing.
Sarah
---------------------- Forwarded by Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron on 08/30/2000
09:56 AM ---------------------------
Donna Fulton
08/30/2000 08:51 AM
To: Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: California ISO Ten-minute market
FYI - Attached is the FERC notice of Cal ISO's filing to implement ten-minute
markets effective September 1, 2000. Do you think there is any interest in
our participation/intervention?
=====================================
|
1,411 |
Subject: Re: IDEA RE ISSUE OF UTILS IN CALIF WANTING $100 PRICE CAP
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/685.
=====================================
Sure makes sense. One concern. If they buy up to 80% of load, do we run the
risk of "stranded cost" problem later down the road when we hit the
backwardated part of the curve. Hinges on the term of the contract. Sort of
chicken and egg problem. If the buy for short terms, the prices will be
high, if they buy for longer terms, the prices will be lower, but the risk of
stranded cost rises. Thoughts?
Margaret Carson
10/18/2000 08:33 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: IDEA RE ISSUE OF UTILS IN CALIF WANTING $100 PRICE CAP
Jeff Is there merit in California's regulators requiring that
utilities first buy up blocks
of firm power to meet, say, 80 percent of their load before they are
allowed a
price cap (be it $100 or whatever) on the rest. It certainly makes
lously economic sense
to price cap ALL of it.. Even pro-utility commissioners can see
through that kind of bail out strategy ..
your comments appreciated ... Margaret...
=====================================
|
1,412 |
Subject: Re: Tickets for the Secretary Summers Address on 12/6
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/4056.
=====================================
My friend, Prentice Sellers, will be picking my ticket up for me.
"Dean's Office" <[email protected]>
Sent by: [email protected]
11/29/2000 06:22 PM
Please respond to "Dean's Office"
To: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected]
cc:
Subject: Tickets for the Secretary Summers Address on 12/6
Dear Haas Students,
We still have many unclaimed tickets left for the Secretary Summers
Research Dialogue Program "Keeping the Economy Growing" at 1:45 on Tuesday,
December 6 in the Andersen Auditorium.
The deadline for Haas students to pick up tickets for this event is this
Friday, December 1 at 2pm.
After the Friday deadline, we will offer all of the unclaimed tickets to
other Cal students who have been clamoring for these tickets.
The Dean's Office is open from 9am to 5pm daily and Evening MBA students
can pick up their tickets at the EMBA Office after 5pm.
Thanks for your cooperation!
The Dean's Staff
=====================================
|
1,413 |
Subject: Re: Info I Sent to Etringer
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/2314.
=====================================
Good points. Paul's traveling. I think it would be a good idea to re-group
on the QF issues in California because the terrain has changed considerably
in CA.
Best,
Jeff
James D Steffes
10/12/2000 08:58 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Info I Sent to Etringer
Jeff & Paul --
Let's make sure that we know how this information is being used by the
commercial people. I'm always worried about sending out % estimates of
future regulatory outcomes because these opinions frequently become "fact".
Jim
Jeff Dasovich
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
10/11/2000 06:50 PM
To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Info I Sent to Etringer
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 10/11/2000 06:53 PM -----
Jeff Dasovich
09/15/2000 05:49 PM
To: Michael Etringer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:
Mike:
Here's the memo on PX-based pricing for QFs that we discussed. If you have
any questions, don't hestitate to get in touch.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
1,414 |
Subject: WGA WEEKLY SCHEDULES for the Week of July 23 - 27
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/28982.
=====================================
Western Government Affairs
WEEKLY SCHEDULES
For the Week of July 23 - 27, 2001
Paul Kaufman
Mon 7/23 Portland OR office
Tue 7/24 Portland OR office
Wed 7/25 Portland OR office
Thu 7/26 Salt Lake City UT
Fri 7/27 Portland OR office
Sue Mara
Mon 7/23 San Francisco CA office
Tue 7/24 San Francisco CA office
Wed 7/25 ISO Board meeting, Folsom CA
Thu 7/26 San Francisco CA office
Fri 7/27 IEP Board meeting, Sacramento CA
Jeff Dasovich
Mon 7/23 Sacramento/San Francisco CA office [TBD]
Tue 7/24 Sacramento/San Francisco CA office [TBD]
Wed 7/25 Sacramento/San Francisco CA office [TBD]
Thu 7/26 Sacramento/San Francisco CA office [TBD]
Fri 7/27 Sacramento/San Francisco CA office [TBD]
Mona Petrochko
Mon 7/23 San Francisco CA office, a.m.; Travel to Houston TX, p.m.
Tue 7/24 Houston TX office
Wed 7/25 Houston TX office
Thu 7/26 Houston TX office
Fri 7/27 San Francisco CA office
Alan Comnes
Mon 7/23 Portland OR office
Tue 7/24 Portland OR office
Wed 7/25 Portland OR office
Thu 7/26 Portland OR office
Fri 7/27 Portland OR office
=====================================
|
1,415 |
Subject: Angelides Investor Memo - Timetable Update
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/848.
=====================================
FYI. My understanding is that the decisions would actually go out prior to Aug. , with "effective date" in Aug., , thus providing time for the appeals process. Do others have a similar or different view? Do we intend to stay in touch, in view of the fact that there's been some "breathing room" provided by the PUC delaying its DA vote, and given the heavy lifting that is still needed to get the core/noncore agreement teed-up and through?
Happy 4th to all.
Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 07/03/2001 12:41 PM -----
-----Original Message-----
From: Philip Angelides, Calif State Treasurer
[mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 7:38 AM
To: FITZPATRICK, Charles
Subject: Investor Memo - Timetable Update
Please note the update regarding the State of California DWR Power Bonds
provided in the attached memo.
<<Investor Memo -- Timetable Update 7-2-01.pdf>>
If you have any questions, please contact Charles Fitzpatrick at (800)
900-3873.
- Investor Memo -- Timetable Update 7-2-01.pdf
=====================================
|
1,416 |
Subject: WGA WEEKLY SCHEDULES for the Week of July 23 - 27
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/508.
=====================================
Western Government Affairs
WEEKLY SCHEDULES
For the Week of July 23 - 27, 2001
Paul Kaufman
Mon 7/23 Portland OR office
Tue 7/24 Portland OR office
Wed 7/25 Portland OR office
Thu 7/26 Salt Lake City UT
Fri 7/27 Portland OR office
Sue Mara
Mon 7/23 San Francisco CA office
Tue 7/24 San Francisco CA office
Wed 7/25 ISO Board meeting, Folsom CA
Thu 7/26 San Francisco CA office
Fri 7/27 IEP Board meeting, Sacramento CA
Jeff Dasovich
Mon 7/23 Sacramento/San Francisco CA office [TBD]
Tue 7/24 Sacramento/San Francisco CA office [TBD]
Wed 7/25 Sacramento/San Francisco CA office [TBD]
Thu 7/26 Sacramento/San Francisco CA office [TBD]
Fri 7/27 Sacramento/San Francisco CA office [TBD]
Mona Petrochko
Mon 7/23 San Francisco CA office, a.m.; Travel to Houston TX, p.m.
Tue 7/24 Houston TX office
Wed 7/25 Houston TX office
Thu 7/26 Houston TX office
Fri 7/27 San Francisco CA office
Alan Comnes
Mon 7/23 Portland OR office
Tue 7/24 Portland OR office
Wed 7/25 Portland OR office
Thu 7/26 Portland OR office
Fri 7/27 Portland OR office
=====================================
|
1,417 |
Subject: CAISO Notice: FERC Order & Load Differentiated Price Caps
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/1345.
=====================================
Yahoo!
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 11/01/2000 01:52 PM -----
CRCommunications <[email protected]>
11/01/2000 12:55 PM
Please respond to "Happ, Susan"
To: ISO Market Participants
<IMCEAEX-_O=CAISO_OU=CORPORATE_CN=DISTRIBUTION+20LISTS_CN=ISO+20MARKET+20PARTI
[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: CAISO Notice: FERC Order & Load Differentiated Price Caps
Given today's Order from FERC setting ISO price caps at $250 MWh for the
next 60 days and specifically rendering the October 26th ISO board vote on a
load differentiated cap null and void, we have ceased efforts to implement
the October 26th motion.
Prior to today's Order, the ISO had been working internally and with vendors
on implementation details. Also, a conference call was held with Market
Participants on October 30th to assess their implementation needs. Based on
this initial work, it appeared that implementation could occur in early
January 2001 but this work is being stopped as a result of today's Order.
CRCommunications
Client Relations Communications
=====================================
|
1,418 |
Subject: Re: California Updates
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/866.
=====================================
I apologize. I thought I'd put you on my "big" distribution list. When and if I do any updates to smaller groups. I'll put you on those, too. Look forward to meeting and discussing next time I'm in Houston.
Best,
Jeff
Kristin Walsh/ENRON@enronXgate 07/06/2001 12:12 PM To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: California Updates
Jeff,
Hope everything in California is going well and hope you had a good 4th of July. Earlier today, I was meeting with some people from EES/ENA and they mentioned that you send out regular updates on California. I would be very interested in being added to the distribution list. This would help us see if there are any discrepancies in what we independent report and give us insight on which issues need to be explored further. If you are ever in Houston, I would love to meet with you and discuss some of our common interests as it relates to commercial operations. Please let me know if you have any questions or are unable to add me to the distribution list.
Thanks,
Kristin Walsh
(713) 853-9510
=====================================
|
1,419 |
Subject: Can you guess?
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/9879.
=====================================
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/13/2001 10:01 AM -----
Karen Denne
03/12/2001 10:31 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Janel
Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Can you guess?
Can you imagine working for a company that has a little more than 500
employees and has the following statistics:
*29 have been accused of spousal abuse
*7 have been arrested for fraud
*19 have been accused of writing bad checks
*117 have directly or indirectly bankrupted at leased 2 businesses
*3 have done time for assault
*71 cannot get a credit card due to bad credit
*14 have been arrested on drug-related charges
*8 have been arrested for shoplifting
*21 are currently defendants in lawsuits
*84 have been arrested for drunk driving in the last year
Can you guess which organization this is?
Give up yet?
It's the 535 members of the United States Congress. The same group that
cranks out hundreds of new laws each year designed to keep the rest of us
in line. You gotta pass this one on!
=====================================
|
1,420 |
Subject: Section 206 filing
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/996.
=====================================
We're getting close to a final draft of our filing in FERC's investigation of
the wholesale market in California. So if you would like an opportunity to
read it please get me your comments by tomorrow.
The motion still does not have a section on governance, but Ron is drafting
it and it will simply summarize Seabron's paper. Also, I made some changes
to Ron's draft to require the FERC to find that it has a pervasive system of
wholesale regulations in California and that the CPUC is therefore pre-empted
from placing restrictions on hedging by wholesale market participants. I
think that argument could be extended to cover the UDC's recovery of stranded
costs, but have not added that to the draft. I wanted to get your feed back
first. If the stranded cost mechanism isn't fixed, I'm not sure that the
other market changes we have recommended will be sufficient. On the other
hand, maybe the PUC is on its way to fixing this part of the problem. Do you
want to have this discussion via E-mail or do you want a conference call on
this?
=====================================
|
1,421 |
Subject: Cal ISO details galore..
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/eci/26.
=====================================
Guys,
There are two separate document here.
Brian
----- Forwarded by Brian Spector/Enron Communications on 06/20/00 09:40 PM
-----
[email protected]
06/20/00 01:41 PM
To: Brian Spector/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
cc:
Subject: Contract Schedules
Brian and Dan -
These schedules are considered "Confidential Information".
<<SCD_A - enron.doc>>
Any questions please let me know. Hopefully this will clear up some of the
"contractual" issues we were discussing earlier today.
All the best, Michelle
- SCD_A - enron.doc
----- Forwarded by Brian Spector/Enron Communications on 06/20/00 09:41 PM
-----
[email protected]
06/20/00 01:42 PM
To: Brian Spector/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
cc:
Subject: Contract Schedules
Brian and Dan -
These schedules are considered "Confidential Information".
<<SCD_B.doc>>
Any questions please let me know. Hopefully this will clear up some of the
"contractual" issues we were discussing earlier today.
All the best, Michelle
- SCD_B.doc
=====================================
|
1,422 |
Subject: Re: Bush visits on Thursday May 17
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/4563.
=====================================
OUR christi nicolay?
Susan M Landwehr
05/13/2001 10:19 PM
To: Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Janel
Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, [email protected]
cc: Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron, Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Bush visits on Thursday May 17
As some of you may know, President Bush is scheduled to visit St. Paul
Minnesota on Thursday to tour the city's District Energy system and to give a
"major speech on energy policy". District Energy is a facility which heats
and cools 75% of the downtown buildings and is converting part of its system
to burn renewable wood biomass. St. Paul Mayor Norm Coleman headed George's
presidential campaign in MN.
It is believed that Spence Abraham and Christi Nicolay will be accompanying
him on the trip.
They are also scheduled to visit another plant in Iowa on Thursday.
=====================================
|
1,423 |
Subject: EES Halts New Power Marketing Efforts in CA
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/4170.
=====================================
FYI.
Jennifer Rudolph@EES
04/18/2001 09:18 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Marcus Dotson/HOU/EES@EES, Edward Hamb/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: meeting?
Hi, all---
You may already know this, but I wanted to keep you updated. All new
commodity (power) business in California has been put on hold. Yesterday,
Eric Letke announced to the team of originators that we would be suspending
new efforts until the regulatory/legislative environment is more solid in
California.
With that news, all of our team meetings and conference calls have been
cancelled.
However, I want to maintain a weekly call (30 min max) on our own....just to
keep-in-touch.
I will defer to your schedules.
Please tell me what day and hour looks best for you.
OR
Is there an existing call that we could join?
I just don't want to lose focus.
Participants:
Regulatory Affairs (Harry, Jeff, Sue, Robert)
Market Development (Marcus Dotson, Jennifer Rudolph, Ed Hamb)
Thank you!
---Jennifer
713-345-8206
=====================================
|
1,424 |
Subject: Angelides Investor Memo - Timetable Update
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/11837.
=====================================
FYI. My understanding is that the decisions would actually go out prior to
Aug. , with "effective date" in Aug., , thus providing time for the appeals
process. Do others have a similar or different view? Do we intend to stay
in touch, in view of the fact that there's been some "breathing room"
provided by the PUC delaying its DA vote, and given the heavy lifting that is
still needed to get the core/noncore agreement teed-up and through?
Happy 4th to all.
Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 07/03/2001 12:41 PM -----
-----Original Message-----
From: Philip Angelides, Calif State Treasurer
[mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 7:38 AM
To: FITZPATRICK, Charles
Subject: Investor Memo - Timetable Update
Please note the update regarding the State of California DWR Power Bonds
provided in the attached memo.
<<Investor Memo -- Timetable Update 7-2-01.pdf>>
If you have any questions, please contact Charles Fitzpatrick at (800)
900-3873.
- Investor Memo -- Timetable Update 7-2-01.pdf
=====================================
|
1,425 |
Subject: Expedited siting in California
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/4527.
=====================================
I spoke with Dan this morning and conveyed our lack of enthusiasm with the
Gov's siting improvements. Do you have any concrete examples of why the
siting is still not adequate and what can be done to improve it? Also, what
is Cisco's position on Calpine's San Jose facility? I thought that Cisco
opposed the plant.
----- Forwarded by Tom Briggs/NA/Enron on 04/06/2001 08:16 AM -----
"Skopec, Dan" <[email protected]>
04/05/2001 10:49 AM
To:
cc:
Subject: Expedited siting in California
as you all know, Gov. Davis has gone to great lengths to highlight the
improvements he's made in the siting and permitting of new energy
generation. however, I have heard from some industry analysts that things
aren't working as well as advertised. do you have any insight on this
issue? I'd like to know if the process has been drastically improved or
just marginally.
if you're not satisfied with the process, what could be done to improve it?
Dan Skopec
Subcommittee on Energy Policy, Natural Resources and Regulatory Affairs
(202) 225-4407
=====================================
|
1,426 |
Subject: Re: IEPA/DA PR efforts
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/9839.
=====================================
I have forwarded the info to Ken, and just spoke with him. Unless there are
particular concerns, he will cover today's PR call with IEP. Otherwise, Sue
or I can listen in at 1. Just let me know.
Best,
Jeff
Janel Guerrero
03/12/2001 02:32 PM
To: Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron,
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
cc:
Subject: IEPA/DA PR efforts
Paul: While we've got coverage of the IEPA working group and the Direct
Access Coaltion, I think it would be useful to have coverage of both groups
PR activities. I'm not sure if our SF/SaCTO people are already covering
this, but if not, maybe Ken can spend some time monitoring their plans etc.
Today's public affairs call for IEPA is at 1:00 pm PST.
1800-486-2460
passcode: 120895
I keep hearing about a Direct Access press conference but have yet to hear
details. Any updates would be useful, and daily/weekly reports on both of
these groups would be terrific!
=====================================
|
1,427 |
Subject: Re:
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/818.
=====================================
Gee, sounds great. Can't wait. Congratz on keeping the sky from falling out
there.
Best,
Jeff
Joe Hartsoe
11/01/2000 05:49 PM
To: [email protected], Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@Enron, Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Karen
Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, [email protected], Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron,
Bernadette Hawkins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@Enron, Mona L
Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Alan
Comnes/PDX/ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT, Tom Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron, Cynthia
Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Kathryn
Corbally/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON,
[email protected]
cc: [email protected]
Subject:
Folks -- Attached is a summary of the Commission's Order on California.
Constitutional Crisis here we come. Later JOE
=====================================
|
1,428 |
Subject: Re:
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/3804.
=====================================
Thank you for your emailed registration for the Lawrence H. Summers event
on December 6, 2000.
Because your request was within the first 300 emailed registrations, you
are entitled to receive a ticket which will allow you to attend this event
in the Andersen Auditorium. Your ticket can be picked up at the Dean's
Suite, Student Services Bldg. Room 520, on Tuesday, November 28 and
Wednesday, November 29 during office hours from 9am to 5pm.
Ticketed seating in Andersen Auditorium will be conducted on a first come,
first served basis, and late comers may need to be prepared to stand at the
back of the Auditorium. Seating will begin approximately 30 minutes prior
to the talk. All ticket holders will be admitted at the upper
entrance. Prior to admittance, a queue will be formed in front of the
doors of the upper level so that early arrivers will get the first choice
of seats.
Please remember to bring your ticket to this event.
Thank you.
The Dean's Staff
At 03:42 PM 11/15/00 -0600, you wrote:
>I would like to attend the event with Secretary Summers.
=====================================
|
1,429 |
Subject: RE: UC Summit Conference
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/734.
=====================================
Jeff, Heather has started work on a draft program, and I've emailed her to
ask if it's something we could shoot over to you. Mike Florio from TURN has
accepted our invitation, so we will have a consumer advocate at the table.
We're asking Diane Feinstein to give a brief opening keynote. I wish we had
more confirmations as of today, but I think all of our hard work is paying
off: The speaker group is getting pretty impressive already (e.g Lynch,
Littlechild, Tyson, Harris), and I'm confident that we will have several top
private sector CEOs as well. The conference will be an excellent one; we'll
keep plugging away to meet all of our goals for it.
I'll keep you posted, and let me know if there's anything else I can do to
help at your end. Thanks for all of your help in getting this going.
Lee
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2000 8:04 AM
To: Lee S. Friedman
Subject: Re: UC Summit Conference
Thanks, Lee. Is there a firmed-up agenda yet? If so, could you forward to
me?
=====================================
|
1,430 |
Subject: Re: Governor Davis on NPR -- Still Doesn't Want to Raise Rates --
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/8967.
=====================================
I haven't heard that, but I was running around quite a bit yesterday.
Governor Backbone has however been recently attempting to appeal to the Nader
(noisy) wing of the party, so it wouldn't be altogether surprising. We can
poke around.
Best,
Jeff
Susan J Mara
02/08/2001 10:15 AM
To: Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Re: Governor Davis on NPR -- Still Doesn't Want to Raise Rates --
AZ Gov Takes Him On
I was mystified by that as well. I'm not convinced that he was referring to
AB 1X.
Jeff or Sandi,
Have you heard the Governor making this reference?
Sue
Mike D Smith@EES
02/08/2001 06:42 AM
To: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Re: Governor Davis on NPR -- Still Doesn't Want to Raise Rates --
AZ Gov Takes Him On
I'm curious about the Gov's statement that he has "eliminated" deregulation.
Is he referring to the direct access ssupension language in AB 1X? Can you
shed some light on this?
=====================================
|
1,431 |
Subject: Re: IMPORTANT THINGS
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/2746.
=====================================
we'll get tuxes.
however, folks won't be going leaving at the same time, so going to the
airport together seems unlikely. and it being new year's eve, i would
strongly suggest taking a cab from the airport to the hotel---gonna be a
zoo. but, on the other hand, if scott and cameron are in for picking folks
up, god love 'em.
Nancy Sellers <[email protected]>
12/22/2000 10:09 AM
To: Cameron <[email protected]>, Jeff Dasovich <[email protected]>,
"Prentice @ Berkeley" <[email protected]>, Prentice Sellers
<[email protected]>, Scott Laughlin <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: IMPORTANT THINGS
Dad forgot to mention:
DRESS CODE (strictly enforced): Black tie or lingerie - so Jeff and Scott if
you do not own a tux you will need to rent one or a peignoir!
I think we should all try to depart at about the same time so we can go to
the airport together.
Can anyone pick us up at the airport when we arrive on Sunday?
Nancy
(707) 251-4870 (phone)
(707) 265-5446 (fax)
"Plus je bois, mieux je chante"
=====================================
|
1,432 |
Subject: The Wierd Turn Pro
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/1534.
=====================================
I think the Senate demos are at 26 to 14; they won Torlakson vs Rainey in
the East Bay, they barely held Machado in Sacramento/San Joaquin, they won
Dede, and they came within 3000 votes of winning Mountjoy's seat in the San
Gabriel Valley. In the Assembly, they won two seats, which should put them
at 48-32. In Congress, we took out Bilbray, Rogan, and Kuykendall, and won
Campbell's open seat, for a net gain of 4. We came within 2000 votes of
beating Steve Horn in Long Beach.
I have no idea about Florida. But in the Senate, there was a net gain of 4
seats, (Washington, Minnesota, Michigan, Missouri, Florida, Delaware), less
Republican take aways in Virginia and Nevada.
So I think that means 50-50. If somehow Lieberman is VP, his seat becomes
vacant, and the Republican Governor of Connecticut makes the appointment.
As Hunter Thompson once said, "when the going gets tough, the wierd turn
pro." vjw
At 11:00 AM 11/8/00 -0600, you wrote:
>
>dude, which way's florida going to go? and what happened with the Cal
>legislature. D's get 2/3's in the senate?
=====================================
|
1,433 |
Subject: FW: Open Letter to Governor / Legislators / Et Al
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/388.
=====================================
You should find this interesting:
Jeff/Sue - for the issues re direct access, surcharges, etc
Mike - Great concern for SCE undercollection and who pays for it. I want to keep Hanson focused on the power plant at their site, but it is obvious that this group would be a natural support for a strategy that would create a bundle of money from QF restructuring.
-----Original Message-----
From: "Bouse, Earl" <[email protected]>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Bouse+2C+20Earl+22+20+3CEarl+2EBouse+40HansonAmerica+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 6:02 PM
To: Dave Parquet (E-mail); Browner, Victor
Subject: Open Letter to Governor / Legislators / Et Al
Greetings:
As promised, the CLECA, SVMG, CMTA, et al letter:
<<Booth CLECA Electrical Open Letter on SCE MOU 07 26 01.doc>>
Earl F. Bouse, Jr.
Hanson Aggregates Mid-Pacific
Hanson Permanente Cement
925.426.4084 Direct Dial 925.426.4060 Fax
[email protected] [email protected]
- Booth CLECA Electrical Open Letter on SCE MOU 07 26 01.doc
=====================================
|
1,434 |
Subject: Re: DuPont
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/3170.
=====================================
OK, it's settled. We will NOT turn in the case this Monday. Good call,
Dylan.
Best,
Jeff
Dylan Windham <[email protected]>
02/10/2001 02:53 PM
To: [email protected]
cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected]
Subject: Re: DuPont
Jeff:
We are not scheduled to turn this in and I don't think it will help at all
with grading. I have looked at the case but frankly I have to work both
days this weekend and probably will not have a lot of time to
contribute. But if the group decides we want to pursue this I will help
all I can.
Dylan
At 12:34 PM 2/9/2001 -0600, [email protected] wrote:
>Hey gang:
>I think that we should do the case. I'm willing to help draft, and willing
>to take a first crack at putting some bullets together about the direction
>I think the memo ought to take and distribute that by about 5 PM tomorrow.
>Though it would be good for other folks to do same and then we could
>compare notes. Makes sense? Thoughts? Suggestions?
>
>Best,
>Jeff
=====================================
|
1,435 |
Subject: Enron Telecommunications, Inc.
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/eci/77.
=====================================
Jeff:
Nice meeting you last Thursday. We will send the (lengthy) Application
for CPCN and tariff(s) this week for your review. I know Anita faxed
some additional material, but will also supplement that per our
discussions.
I did lobbying in Sacramento and know the legislature's compulsion
for telecom. "consumer" issues - you mentioned SB 1217 (Richard Alarcon)
which did pass through Deb Bowen's committee and the Senate, but which
is going nowhere in the Assembly (Wright's committee). This bill re
open access is contrary to Federal law and to the FCC's hands-off
stance, and appears dead. There is still the ongoing debate in Portland
(and SF) which will turn on an upcoming 9th Cir. court decision (due any
day now). The 9th Cir. could breathe life into this issue by allowing
Portland's open access mandate via the transfer of the franchise
agreement. Also note today's WSJ article re AOL's new found quandry.
The tide is against open access for the moment.
Please call or email if you have nay questions whatsoever.
Jeremy Meier
Blumenfeld & Cohen
394-7500
=====================================
|
1,436 |
Subject: Re: california
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/9.
=====================================
Great. Glad to hear it. Did you get my voice mail? Makes sense for you to
go ahead and start cobbling together a formal proposal. I've talked to folks
internally (and will discuss further with them tomorrow and Friday when I'm
in Houston). I'd like you to keep the information confidential, but I'm
fairly confident that we're already at the point where it's not a matter of
whether but of what the terms and conditions of the contract and the scope of
the project will be.
Best,
Jeff
[email protected] on 08/16/2000 12:31:57 PM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Re: california
All's well. Great enthusiasm from everyone I have contacted so far. We can
undoubtedly pull this off. Look forward to hearing from you.
-- David
[email protected] on 08/14/2000 01:33:16 PM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Re: california
Hi David:
Thanks again for meeting last week. Just wanted to let you know that I'll
be meeting in Houston on Thursday to discuss the project we discussed.
Hope all is going well thus far on your end.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
1,437 |
Subject: Squaw Valley Discount Tickets
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/585.
=====================================
Backed by popular demand.....
I am collecting money for Squaw Valley discount ski tickets.
If you are interested in purchasing these tickets, you MUST give me your
money by Tuesday, October 23rd. We need to purchase at least 50 tickets to
get the deal (last year this was not a problem).
The tickets are $47 a piece. (full price is $56)
(If you have extra vouchers from last year you can give me those + $2 each,
and I can get you tickets for this year).
Please make your checks out to me and put them in my box by Tuesday,
October 23rd..
See you on the slopes!
-Will Birdsey '02
>SKI & RIDE SQUAW FOR ONLY $47 PER DAY!
>
>Basic parameters for the 2001/2002 season include:
>* $47 tickets (all tickets include free night skiing!).
>* No restrictions: tickets are valid any day of the season.
>* Unused Vouchers may be
> Redeemed for summer activities at High Camp
>or, Redeemed towards a full-price ticket at any
>time during the following season (you pay only the difference between
>discount rate and full rate).
=====================================
|
1,438 |
Subject: Re[2]: Clarkson
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/8712.
=====================================
Please read the memo I constructed using the previously forwarded work. You
will see that I took the opposite tactic in approving the loan as opposed to
the
original memo that recommended denial.
Read it and see if you disagree or not. As you will see, I base most of the
rationale on the pro forma 1996 financial statements. However, I kept most of
the dissenting language in the memo to highlight our reservations and/or
concerns.
My guess is that we can go either way since our beloved professor stated last
week that there is no wrong answer. However, we some of the numbers in the
spreadsheet forwarded to me, I couldn't recreate some of your stats and there
were no formulas behind the numbers. That is why I changed some of the
numbers
in the memo to reflect my calculations.
Please provide me with any feedback.
**********************************************
Mark D. Guinney, CFA
Consultant
Watson Wyatt Investment Consulting
345 California Street, Ste. 1400
San Francisco, CA 94104
(415) 733-4487 ph.
(415) 733-4190 fax
- Clarkson Case Memo final.doc
=====================================
|
1,439 |
Subject: Invitation from Dean Laura Tyson
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/3663.
=====================================
Dear Haas Student:
New York Venture Capitalist Alan J. Patricof will be at the Haas School on
Wednesday November 29, 2000 to participate in the 2000-2001 Haas Business
Faculty Research Dialogue: Shakeout in Cyberspace--What's Next for the Dot
Coms? The Business Faculty Research Dialogues are sponsored by the Clausen
Center for International Business and Policy and California Management
Review.
Founded in 1969 by Alan Patricof, Patricof & Co. has helped start a number of
major companies, including Apple Computer, AOL, Office Depot and bigchalk.com
The firm manages over $7.0 billion on behalf of institutional investors in
the US and abroad. Mr. Patricof will speak in the Haas School's Wells Fargo
Room at 12:30 p.m. on Wednesday November 29, 2000. Refreshments will be
available in the Wells Fargo Room starting at 12:00 p.m.
Please contact Ms. Meredith LaCorte in the dean's office if you will be able
to join us for the program. She can be reached at 510-643-2027 or in email at
[email protected].
Sincerely,
Laura D'Andrea Tyson
Dean
=====================================
|
1,440 |
Subject: FW: CA costs model
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['Harry', '[email protected]', 'Michael; Steffes', 'James D.; Kingerski', 'Tribolet']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/162.
=====================================
Jeff:
FYI -
I meant to copy you on this yesterday.
Jennifer
-----Original Message-----
From: Thome, Jennifer
Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2001 4:34 PM
To: Neustaedter, Robert
Cc: Tribolet, Michael; Steffes, James D.; Kingerski, Harry
Subject: CA costs model
Robert:
I have not yet received data from Steve and Gordon. In the meantime, I would appreciate if you could please review the attached and let me know if you think it covers everything we decided on Friday.
Notes:
1. I added an Assumptions/Data page, and made separate taps for "legacy" and "new" customers, as discussed.
2. I incorporated the 3 scenarios we discussed for DA customers.
3. I added a Scenario Analysis section that allows the user to see the impact of different scenarios on costs.
4.In the current model, I assume that we will not assign a probability to regulatory costs and that they are spread evenly across utilities.
Once you have reviewed and brought up any questions, I suggest we work on getting the additional info. from Portland in order to complete the model.
Thanks,
Jennifer
=====================================
|
1,441 |
Subject: EMR Volatile Prices Conference, Oct 12 & 13
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', 'Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/490.
=====================================
Please confirm your interest in participating the conference below by return
e-mail to me. I forwarded the details of this conference to each of you
under seperate cover. At that time you expressed an interest in
participating.
---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT on 09/18/2000 01:45
PM ---------------------------
TIM HEIZENRADER
09/15/2000 03:56 PM
To: John M Forney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Fischer/PDX/ECT@ECT, Robert
Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matt Motley/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jeff Richter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg
Wolfe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Stokley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: EMR Volatile Prices Conference, Oct 12 & 13
I've negotiated a group rate for EMR's Oct 12 & 13 conference that works out
to $278 per person, up to a maximum of 18 people. Reservations are:
Realtime- 3 tickets
Volume Management- 1
DSW Term- 2
DSW Cash- 1
CA Term- 1
CA Cash- 1
Mid Market- 2
Fundamentals- 2
Gov't Affairs- 5
Please send me names of probable attendees by October 1 so that I can send
them on to EMR. Thanks,
Tim
=====================================
|
1,442 |
Subject: Re: Background for Skilling for Call w/Bryson
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT', 'Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT', 'Don', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/11310.
=====================================
Your'e good, really, really, good.
From: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON on 04/19/2001 05:34 PM CDT
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Don
Black/HOU/EES@EES, Hap Boyd/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@ENRON,
James W Lewis/HOU/EES@EES, Linda J Noske/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
Tribolet/ENRON@enronXgate, Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@ENRON, Robert C Williams/Enron@EnronXGate, Steve
Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@ENRON, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, William
S Bradford/Enron@EnronXGate
Subject: Background for Skilling for Call w/Bryson
Folks:
My apologies. This is not proofed, but I wanted to make sure that everyone
had a chance to review and comment. Apologies for any unintentional
omissions and errors. I think it tracks closely with the direction agreed to
on the call today. All comments are encouraged and welcome.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
1,443 |
Subject: devaluation and lm curve
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/269.
=====================================
For those who attended section I promised to clarify whether the LM
needed to shift if a country on fixed exchange rates chose to devalue
when suddenly facing a higher risk premium.
Because of the risk premium and the outflow of capital at the prevailing
interest rate, r*, the absence of any central bank action combined with
allowing the exchange rate to float, automatically lowers the exchange
rate. So no shift of the LM curve is required.
Basically the demand for assets denominated in the currency has declined
thereby putting downward pressure on the currency. The decision to float
the exchange rate "accomodates" this decline in demand and the central
bank does not need to increase money supply to cause the devaluation, it
happens on its own.
Of course, the new exchange rate should be pegged at the level where
r=r* + theta. Now in the future, the central bank will do whatever is
required to keep the exchange rate at the new level.
For those who don't follow this, don't worry it is a fairly technical
point, but I wanted to make sure I clarified it.
bhash
=====================================
|
1,444 |
Subject: Re: Media Story
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/2436.
=====================================
fyi, i returned the call.
From: Jeff Dasovich on 12/11/2000 05:01 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: George Waidelich/SFO/EES@EES
cc: Eric Letke/DUB/EES@EES, Greg Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: Media Story
Refer such calls to Karen Denne in Houston. Thanks.
George Waidelich@EES
12/11/2000 04:57 PM
To: Eric Letke/DUB/EES@EES, Greg Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Media Story
I received a call from Tim Roberts of the Energy Journal in San Jose CA.
They are writing a piece on the current energy situation in CA and how it is
effecting IPP's and power marketers and their intentions towards the CA
market in the future. He would like to speak with somebody at Enron. As far
as I know, I do no have media clearance so I had no comment.
If Enron wants an opportunity to make a public statement we should talk to
this guy as early as possible today or tomorrow. He can be reached at
408-299-1821.
George Waidelich
925-543-3801
=====================================
|
1,445 |
Subject: Re: California Updates
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/28360.
=====================================
I apologize. I thought I'd put you on my "big" distribution list. When and
if I do any updates to smaller groups. I'll put you on those, too. Look
forward to meeting and discussing next time I'm in Houston.
Best,
Jeff
Kristin Walsh/ENRON@enronXgate
07/06/2001 12:12 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: California Updates
Jeff,
Hope everything in California is going well and hope you had a good 4th of
July. Earlier today, I was meeting with some people from EES/ENA and they
mentioned that you send out regular updates on California. I would be very
interested in being added to the distribution list. This would help us see
if there are any discrepancies in what we independent report and give us
insight on which issues need to be explored further. If you are ever in
Houston, I would love to meet with you and discuss some of our common
interests as it relates to commercial operations. Please let me know if you
have any questions or are unable to add me to the distribution list.
Thanks,
Kristin Walsh
(713) 853-9510
=====================================
|
1,446 |
Subject: Correction, See Time Change for Western Wholesale Activities - Gas
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/4183.
=====================================
Sorry, forgot to change the time on this memo........
Beginning with this Thursday, April 19th and all future meetings, it is
necessary that we delay the above scheduled weekly conference call by 30
minutes in order to avoid overlapping with another one.
My apologies for the late notice but please make the necessary changes to
your calendar immediately. All dial in numbers and passcodes remain the
same, the time is the only thing we are changing. Again, here is the
information for verification:
Conference room EB-47C1has been reserved for the Houston participants.,
Date: Every Thursday beginning April 5,
Time: 1:00 pm Pacific, 3:00 pm Central, and 4:00 pm Eastern time,
Number: 1-888-271-0949,
Host Code: 661877, (for Jim only),
Participant Code: 936022, (for everyone else),
There will not be a call on Thursday, November 22 which is Thanksgiving.
If you have any questions regarding this call or if there are names that
need to be added to the list for future notification of changes, please give
me a call at 713-853-6082.
Thanks,
Linda
=====================================
|
1,447 |
Subject: RE: NDA Redux
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/eci/42.
=====================================
The issue taking time to resolve is the ability to disclose under the
existing agreement, even with an NDA. Will keep you posted. One smaller
issue on the NDA is that ISO wants to make sure that info can't be given to
the Enron power affiliates. I assume thatr won't be a problem.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2000 4:04 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: NDA Redux
Greetings:
Dennis (and you) getting comfortable with the NDA?
Best,
Jeff
============================================================================
This message contains information which may be confidential and privileged.
Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive for the addressee),
you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or any information
contained in the message. If you have received the message in error, please
advise the sender by reply e-mail @mofo.com, and delete the message.
Thank you very much.
============================================================================
=====================================
|
1,448 |
Subject: Correction of misstatement regarding Dean Tyson's resignation
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/827.
=====================================
Dear Members of the Haas Community:
As I'm sure many of you have noticed, it was erroneously reported by email last Friday and in Haas Week today that Dean Tyson would continue serving as dean of the Haas School through the end of the academic year. Professor Tyson will resign her position as dean at the end of December 2001 as she had planned. Associate Dean Ben Hermalin will begin serving as interim dean of the Haas School on January 1, 2002, and will continue in that role until the Chancellor's choice of a new dean is announced.
The Dean's Office received an email from Vice Provost Jan de Vries announcing the formation of a search committee to select the new dean and a request that it be distributed to the Haas community. The Provost's memo misstated the date of Dean Tyson's resignation. Unfortunately, staff in the Dean's Office did not notice the error until after the news had been released.
The Dean's Office will forward a revised memo from Vice Provost de Vries regarding the Dean's Search Committee when it is received.
Marybeth Schubert
Deputy Dean
=====================================
|
1,449 |
Subject: Re: Republican letter
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/3150.
=====================================
Neat.
Susan M Landwehr
02/09/2001 06:38 AM
To: Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda
Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Republican letter
Good morning. One of my contacts at RGA sent me a copy of a letter that went
to DOE Secretary Abraham this week, thanking him for his participation in the
WGA conference in Portland. It stated, in part :
"We now believe it is imperative, given the importance of encouraging the
development of and investment in new plant construction, that you NOTextend
the Department of Energy orders requiring the sale of electricity and natural
gas, and a cap on those prices."
The general tone of the overall letter was that they want Davis to continue
fixing his own problem. The letter was copied to Dick Cheney and Chairman
Hebert. I'll send a copy along via fax later today. The signing Governors
were: Hull, Owens, Kempthorne, Martz, Guinn, Gary Johnson, Leavitt,
Geringer--all republicans.
=====================================
|
1,450 |
Subject: Protest Procedures for U.S. Enron Facilities to ALL SENIOR
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/11957.
=====================================
FYI
Protest procedures!
----- Forwarded by Cristina Zavala/SF/ECT on 07/12/2001 05:28 PM -----
David Parquet
07/05/2001 03:48 PM
To: April Hrach/SF/ECT@ECT, Cristina Zavala/SF/ECT@ECT, Michael
McDonald/SF/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Protest Procedures for U.S. Enron Facilities to ALL SENIOR
MANAGEMENT
----- Forwarded by David Parquet/SF/ECT on 07/05/2001 03:47 PM -----
Mark Palmer- (Public Relations)@ENRON
Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
06/14/2001 09:40 PM
To: CORP Officers
cc:
Subject: Protest Procedures for U.S. Enron Facilities to ALL SENIOR
MANAGEMENT
In the past few months, there have been protests at various Enron offices.
These protests have been primarily by consumer and other advocacy groups
representing different energy interests. Attached are security and public
relations procedures to help you manage a protest should one arise at your
facility. Feel free to provide this document to leaders in your organization
as appropriate.
Thank You.
Mark Palmer
Vice President, Corporate Communications
713 853-4738
=====================================
|
1,451 |
Subject: RE: ISO
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/eci/58.
=====================================
Not too much. ISO has been focusing on getting control over all of the
capacity, and I have been pointing out that the clock is ticking and that we
should deal with the large chunk we already have. I have a call later this
week, so we'll see. I believe they remain interested in reducing their
costs by offloading this.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, March 20, 2000 10:26 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: ISO
Greetings: Any progress to speak of?
============================================================================
This message contains information which may be confidential and privileged.
Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive for the addressee),
you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or any information
contained in the message. If you have received the message in error, please
advise the sender by reply e-mail @mofo.com, and delete the message.
Thank you very much.
============================================================================
=====================================
|
1,452 |
Subject: Interconnection Agreements
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/2828.
=====================================
Hi Everyone,
I just spoke with Joe Edwards about interconnection agreements with ILECs in
states where we have CLEC authority. Joe was very appreciative of having our
group take the lead on this issue. We'll be providing guidance in
understanding how these agreements work, identifying the best starting point
for negotiation and then participating in the negotiations along with Joe's
group.
Joe would like to see copies of the sample PacBell agreements that we have
for California. He also is interested in seeing agreements for SBC in Texas,
Verizon in NY and NJ, and US West in Oregon.
Donald: I'm hoping you will lead this effort. Can you give me a call to
talk about how we should approach it?
Jeff: Can you send Joe the disc you forwarded to Scott, Donald and I a while
ago for California?
Marchris and Margo: Can you get copies of interconnection agreements SBC has
signed in Texas?
Margo: When you talk to Andrew Fischer this afternoon, can you ask him for
copies of interconnection agreements that Verizon has signed in New York?
Thanks,
Sue
=====================================
|
1,453 |
Subject: SAVE THE DATE - ANNUAL PLAN. CONF.
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/12583.
=====================================
Please SAVE THE DATE for the Silicon Valley Manufacturing Group's Annual
Planning Conference, scheduled for Thursday and Friday, October 4 and 5, in
Half Moon Bay.
As you know, each year the SVMG Planning Conference allows all Liaison
Representatives, Committee Chairs and Committee Members a chance to look
back at the current year to evaluate our performance, and to look forward at
the next three years to prepare a rolling three-year business plan. In
addition, we invite in key guests to speak with us about the pressing issues
facing our region and state.
YOUR PARTICIPATION IN THIS YEAR'S PLANNING CONFERENCE IS VERY IMPORTANT. I
truly hope you will join us, and we will follow-up with more details soon.
Last year, 60 Member Company representatives participated in this important
event, and their collective effort has helped make this year one of the most
successful in SVMG's history. With your help, next year can be even better.
Thank you for your time and consideration. Please let me know if you have
any questions.
Sincerely,
Carl Guardino
- winmail.dat
=====================================
|
1,454 |
Subject: Meetings in Sacramento
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/4424.
=====================================
FYI. Karen, can you forward along to Marathon. Thanks.
Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 05/01/2001 05:47 PM -----
=09Rosalee Fleming
=0905/01/2001 05:45 PM
=09=09=20
=09=09 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
=09=09 cc: Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
=09=09 Subject: Meetings in Sacramento
THURSDAY, MAY 3, 2001
8:00 a.m. - Meeting with David Freeman
to your suite at the Hyatt Regency=20
10:00 w/Steve Kean
Contact: Robin at 916-322-6988
Sedan to take you to the Capitol=20
10:30 a.m. - Meeting with Jim Brulte
Capitol =01) Room 305 in the restored section
Contact: Susan Mahea=20
916-445-3688
=20
11:00 a.m. - Meeting with Senator John Burton
Room 205
Scheduler: Linda
916-445-1412
12:00 noon - Possible lunch with Assembly Member David Cox
Scheduler: Cheyene =01) 916-319-2005
1:00 p.m. - Meeting with House Speaker Robert Hertzberg
916-319-2040
2:00 p.m. - Meeting with John Campbell
Room 2174
Contact: Matt Back
916-319-2535
Depart for San Francisco
Bev Hanson is
=====================================
|
1,455 |
Subject: Re: Assembly goes in at 4pm today
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/29008.
=====================================
Quick add on to Sue's note:
Right now, appears they're focused on the budget, but could take up energy.
There appears to continue to be considerable uncertainty----seems that even
many Democratic Assembly members don't know at this point what the plan is
for this afternoon/evening. Our lobbyists are attempting to get more info,
which we'll pass on soon as we get it.
Best,
Jeff
Susan J Mara
07/23/2001 11:38 AM
To: Richard Shapiro/Enron@EnronXGate, James D Steffes/Enron@EnronXGate,
Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Susan M Landwehr/Enron@EnronXGate, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Paul Kaufman/Enron@EnronXGate, Harry
Kingerski/Enron@EnronXGate, Michael Tribolet/ENRON@enronXgate, Kristin
Walsh/Enron@EnronXGate, [email protected], Karen Denne/Enron@EnronXGate,
Janel Guerrero/Enron@EnronXGate, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vicki
Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Wanda Curry/Enron@EnronXGate, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Assembly goes in at 4pm today
Our lobbyist called to let us know.
Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
=====================================
|
1,456 |
Subject: FW: Moral Questions
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/4333.
=====================================
To: Bill Hart; Carol Lexa; Doug Lexa; Geoffrey Smith; Joan Niemeier;
Kate Albrecht; MarJo Lexa; Mark & Judy Albrecht; Peter Wellington; Rod
Covington; Scott Farmer; Sue & Bob Brakesman; Tersilla Gregory; Thomas
Subject: Moral Questions
I have a moral question for you.? This is an imaginary situation, but I
think it is fun to decide what one would do.
The situation:? You are in the Midwest, and there is a huge flood in
progress.? Many homes have been lost, water supplies
compromised and infrastructures destroyed.
Let's say that you're a photographer out getting still photos for a news
service, traveling alone, looking for particularly
poignant scenes.? You come across George W. Bush, who has been swept
away by the floodwaters.? He is barely hanging on
to a tree limb and is about to go under.? You can either put down your
camera and save him, or take a Pulitzer Prize-winning
photograph of him as he loses his grip on the limb.
So, here's the question, and think carefully before you answer the
question below:
Which lens would you use ?
=====================================
|
1,457 |
Subject: Issues for Rod Wright Response
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/3086.
=====================================
The way that I see it, the Rod Wright issues that are important the following
-- everything else is either jurisdictionally questionable or can't fly on
its own weight.
1. Reduce environmental roadblocks to bring more plants on line.
WHY ARE WE ATTACKING THE ENVIRONMENT? ANY PROBLEM IS A PROBLEM.
6. Provide IOU's with price management tools including bilateral contract and
hedging authority.
GREAT FOR EPMI SOLUTIONS.
15. Extend the rate freeze for PG&E and SCE beyond 3/2002
NEED FOR EES BOOK. ALSO NEED THIS TO END THE RADICAL CALLS TO "FIX" THE
WHOLESALE MARKETS WITH WHOLESALE MARKET PRICE CAPS.
19. Repayment of under collections for PG&E and SCE.
OTHERWISE NOTHING ELSE WILL HAPPEN BECAUSE WE'LL BE FIGHTING ABOUT THIS ALL
SESSION.
27. Utilities are deemed prudent in forward contracting.
NEED THIS FOR EPMI DEALS.
28. Manage volatility for residential customers through OREGON solution.
OR THROUGH DEFAULT SERVICE COMPETITION. A MUST HAVE FOR POLITICIANS. REAL
QUESTION IS CAN THEY RAISE THE RATES A LITTLE TO MANAGE THE HIGHER COSTS AT
WHOLESALE.
=====================================
|
1,458 |
Subject: SoCalGas Capacity Forum
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/5112.
=====================================
Dude, what a loaded question. Of course, we should always use opportunities
like this to further Enron's position on landscape - regulation/artificial
barriers, suck, competitive market solutions, rule! Its clear to me that
SoCal Gas sees this as an opportunity to kill two birds with one stone... I'm
the prudent LDC looking for solutions, and I don't have support at the CPUC
to get acceptable rate treatment.
They don't address the regulatory issues here with respect to unbundling, et
al. I'm not sure what opportunity there will be here to push that agenda
forward. When you talk about hospitable investment climate, aren't you
talking about both rate coverage as well as regulatory landscape?
Are you interested in going?
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 2:46 PM
To: Fawcett, Jeffery
Subject: Re: SoCalGas Capacity Forum
Do we want to position this as "let the market do it, cuz it can do it better
than Socalgas; but the market ain't going to do anything if you don't create
an hospitable investment climate?"
=====================================
|
1,459 |
Subject: Gas Strategy OII: Report on Balancing Question Due February 1st
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/5598.
=====================================
Gas Strategy OII Parties:
Attached for your review is a draft letter which we propose to send to the
Energy Division next week on Thursday, February 1, 2001. Such a letter is
required by Section 2.1.3.7 of our Comprehensive Gas OII Settlement that was
approved by the CPUC in D.00-05-049, which states that "By February 1, 2001,
the OFO Forum will recommend to the Commission whether the amount of storage
capacity allocated to balancing service should be revised." Based on prior
discussions with many of you, as well as the fact that we now have many
other higher priorities, it appears to be the consensus that no change of
this type should be implemented during the term of the Gas Accord.
Please let me know by e-mail no later than Wednesday, January 31, if you
have concerns with the attached draft letter, so that I may file it with the
CPUC on February 1st.
Thank you for your attention to this follow-up matter.
Randy Litteneker
PG&E Law Department
[email protected]
415-973-2179
<<Gas OII Storage for Balancing Letter_.doc>>
- Gas OII Storage for Balancing Letter_.doc
=====================================
|
1,460 |
Subject: RE: CSO - Read only if you are a graduating native Japanese Haas
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/1726.
=====================================
Sorry, here's the document
Rich
-----Original Message-----
From: Rich Wong [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 9:34 AM
To: [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]
Subject: CSO - Read only if you are a graduating native Japanese Haas
student
Per the attached document, Angela Lewis, a representative from The Japan
Partnership,
an international executive search firm, will be in the area at 5pm on
Sunday, October 7th and
is interested in meeting with native Japanese graduating Haas students to
discuss career opportunities in Japan.
If you are interested in attending this presentation, please respond back to
me
right away. The volume of responses will determine whether the event will
take
place or not. It is scheduled to take place in the Faculty Club.
Regards,
Rich
Rich Wong
Account Manager, Technology & Entertainment
MBA Recruiting
Haas School of Business Career Center
545 Student Services Building #1900
Berkeley, CA 94720-1900
ph: 510-643-4211
fax: 510-643-5257
email:[email protected]
=====================================
|
1,461 |
Subject: Brief in Rate Stabilization Proceeding
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/9410.
=====================================
Despite the fact that the hearings will probably continue into Wednesday of
this week, the briefs in Phase I of the Rate Stabilization Proceeding are
still due this Friday the 2nd. One of the issues before the ALJ is the use
of interim versus final market valuation to end the rate freeze. I am very
hesitant to say that the rate freeze cannot end on the basis of a Commission
approved interim valuation as Enron has, in previous proceedings, taken the
position that it can. Please let me know right away if you feel different
about this. Along these same lines, the issue of the value of the assets is
somewhat at play (at least on an interim basis). Do we want to take a
position that the assets need to be market valued (rather than book) thus
increasing the rate base for the purpose of cost of service regulation which
the assets are now under? Increased generation rate would mean an increased
DA credit. However, it may also hurt our claim that we should get a piece of
the retained generation. Again let me know as soon as possible about your
position.
Jeanne Bennett
=====================================
|
1,462 |
Subject: What others are saying re: applicability of surcharge to DA
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/10712.
=====================================
Poll thus far:
Aron Thomas (AES) just decided not to file. He made the decision after
talking to Edison, who told him that Edison is going to suggest in its filing
that the surcharge be applied--get this--to the PX credit; thus, ESPs would
pay, but then get it back through the credit (can you say "poor quality
receivables"?). Aron feels that the issue should be figured out in work
shops and the Commission should not decide it in the policy phase.
Bill Booth (CLECA) is going to remain silent on the issue because he doesn't
know what the position of his members is.
Keith McCrae (CMA) is going to say that 1) the surcharge should not apply to
direct acces customers and 2) the governor stated publicly that he supports
direct access.
Jeanne's checking with the Industrial Users Group to see what they're going
to say. Since CMA is going to ask for clarification, I would suggest that we
remain silent and focus on the other rate design/cost allocation issues,
e.g., equity, no cross subsidies.
Thoughts?
I let you know what I hear back from Jeanne.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
1,463 |
Subject: Re: Global Case
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/1934.
=====================================
Jeff:
Once again you cannot hold up your end. I can't believe that you cannot
make it to class. It isn't like you have a job or anything.
--Dylan
PS. I would be happy to turn it in for you. I will use this version if
no-one makes changes. If they do just send me the updates.
At 11:56 AM 11/26/00 -0600, [email protected] wrote:
>OK folks, here it is. Sorry for the delay, but those pesky questions ended
>up being more detailed than I anticipated. Please take a quick look and
>let me know if there are any comments---more ambiguities than usual in this
>one. I'll await comments and finalize this evening.
>
>Jimmie/Dylan--my apologies, but last Wednesday evening, I found out that I
>have to be in LA for a meeting tomorrow. If I make it to class at all
>tomorrow, I won't get there until after the break. Could one of you print
>out the case and bring it to class? If not, don' t sweat it, I'll email
>him an electronic and turn in a hard copy to him on Tuesday. Sorry for any
>hassle.
>
>Best,
>Jeff
>
>(See attached file: Case 26-1 Global Industries.doc)
=====================================
|
1,464 |
Subject: Portfolio Scenarios
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/4548.
=====================================
Jeff,
I hope this approaches what you were looking for. I have included three
scenarios:
(1) A no hedge (status quo) scenario;
(2) A scenario that allocates 30% of the max short position (July avg monthly
peak) to the 5- and 10-year contracts each; and
(3) A "balanced" scenario that attempts to shape the various contracts to the
load profile.
As I said on the phone today, the price for all three of these is going to be
roughly the same. This is b/c the swaps are based on the monthly curve
(which we are using as a proxy for spot prices), so that all else equal, a
portfolio that is 100% 10-year fixed price will have the same all-in price as
one that is based on 10 years of monthly prices. However, the volatility
with the former is far less than with the latter. The price graphs
illustrate this to some degree, but they still do not (and cannot, really)
accurately represent the volatility that the utilities will be avoiding if
they hedge with a portfolio such as we are suggesting. If you have any
questions or need anything else, please call. Cheers...
=====================================
|
1,465 |
Subject: Referred to You By the Greens about Possibly Growing Grapes on My
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/3402.
=====================================
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 02/27/2001 11:15 AM -----
Jeff Dasovich
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
02/27/2001 11:14 AM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Referred to You By the Greens about Possibly Growing Grapes on My
Property
Greetings Sally:
My name is Jeff Dasovich. The Greens have been helping me develop 40 acres
of land that I bought just north of Anchor Bay (a couple of miles up the
hill from Highway One, about 1200 ft or so up) and they suggested that I
contact you.
The property is right in the heart of the Banana Belt and my property faces
south, is protected, and a such is very hot and sunny from late spring
through later summer/early fall. The property has an abundance of water on
it. Of course, the possibility of evening fog raises some tricky issues,
and I haven't done soil tests. In short, while I think there are some
challenges, I'm convinced that there is at least the strong possibility
that I could grow grapes--around 10 acres or so.
I'm sure that you're extremely busy, but I'd be very interested in talking
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
1,466 |
Subject: Revised Outline
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/7755.
=====================================
Attached is an update of the CESG Outline to reflect issues discussed
during Tuesday's telephone conference. (Again, the principles outlined
do not necessarily reflect full consensus, but follow the general
direction of our discussion today.) The second attachment is a draft
outline of the Integrated Portfolio Approach that John
Flory has been working on; it's referenced in the Rate Stabilization
section of our outline.
Follow up:
(1) John Fielder has committed to get back on forward contracting
issues for our meeting on Friday.
(2) It would also be beneficial in advance of Friday's meeting to
have a proposal from the large customer group on rate stabilization
alternatives.
We will begin Friday's 10:00 meeting with the Rate Stabilization issues
-- a place where we've failed to make progress. Please note that Dan
Richard of PG&E has
been added to the email distribution, and PG&E may attend our meeting on
Friday.
Again, thanks to all of you for your constructive efforts.
- CESG Working Draft 121200.doc
- PX Proposed Integrated Portfolio Approach12-8-00
=====================================
|
1,467 |
Subject: Re: Conference Call with Linda Robertson, 2/13/01 @ 6:00 PM (EST);
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/5352.
=====================================
The purpose of this call is to prepare materials for Steve Kean who is
appearing before Chairmen Tauzin and Barton and other Republican members of
the House Energy and Commerce Committee on Feb 21. The meeting/roundtable
will be held in California. Although this is not an official congressional
hearing, we need to inventory what Steve will need for his presentation.
Thanks.
Lora Sullivan
02/12/2001 04:48 PM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Joseph
Alamo/NA/Enron@Enron, [email protected]
cc: Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Conference Call with Linda Robertson, 2/13/01 @ 6:00 PM (EST);
800-713-8600; code 6261
Linda Robertson is hosting a conference call/strategy session on Tuesday,
February 13, 2001 to discuss what's happening on the ground in California.
Tuesday, February 13, 2001
6:00 PM EST
5:00 PM CST
3:00 PM PST
800-713-8600; Passcode: 6261
=====================================
|
1,468 |
Subject: Re: Netscape
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/11126.
=====================================
Jeff,
You're obviously right about discounting cash flow. I was getting a little
lazy. The capital exp in Exhibit 3 in the book is close to what you have in
the model. I agree about your working capital assumption. I guess I'm not
clear on your conclusion. The $3+ you calculated a share is based on 16%
growth. We are being asked to calculate what growth justifies $28/share. I
calculate 31% growth for $14/share and about 40% growth for $28 per share.
Reality is their immediate growth is probably going to be higher than both
numbers but would not be sustainable for 10 years.
Anyway while we bat this around, I've begun putting some bullshit into the
memo. I guess I vote we double the price. The other IPO in Exhibit 6
(especially Uunet) demonstrate how hot the high tech IPO market is. IPOs are
a lot about emotion and maybe a little about cash flow. What's the down side
if the offering doesn't sell well. Netscape has a very hot business they
should extract a high price for the potential gold mind they offer (this is
my 1999 thinking, not 2000). Comments?
Jimmy
=====================================
|
1,469 |
Subject: Re: Hectic?
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/741.
=====================================
Boy did I flake on the happy hour. Jeff-I think I've
gone over THE edge. Hectic does't even work anymore.
I'm on a (fairly)good project at HP..IN SACRAMENTO,
in fact 20 miles north of Sacramento. I LOVE the
company, the learning, the work, the teams, the
people, the career opportunities. I hate the 4+ hours
of driving on Mondays and Tuesdays, strategizing(real
word?) about balancing the needs of the team with
getting my ass to school. I really want to talk to
you...I'm thinking about full time and want your
thoughts. Are you available at break on Tuesday for a
beer?
Courtney
--- [email protected] wrote:
> Hey there stranger:
> By the looks of your attire (very nice), and the
> pace of you walk the other
> night, looks like you're back in the working groove.
> Hope work is fun and
> your classes are good. I'm trying to get used to
> the "no life" thing
> again. And you slacked on the happy hour.
>
> Best,
> Jeff
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Photos - 35mm Quality Prints, Now Get 15 Free!
http://photos.yahoo.com/
=====================================
|
1,470 |
Subject: Briefing notes
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/natural_gas_strategy/19.
=====================================
With some changes suggested by Doug as well as Mike's suggestion.
See y'all on Monday.
<<April Briefing for CPUC.doc>>
--
Michael S. Alexander
Southern California Edison
Energy Supply and Marketing
626-302-2029
----------
From: MBD [SMTP:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2000 9:50 AM
To: 'Jeff Dasovich'; Alexander, Michael S
Cc: MBD
Subject: RE: Monday's PHC
I agree Michael, its good. My only suggestion is to add a bullet
collecting
the benefits for the core aggregation program, suggesting that the
unbundling of balancing and storage and interstate capacity,
combined with
the billing credits will help make the program more economically
viable and
revive the opportunity to offer competitive benefits to core
customers.
Mike Day
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Dasovich [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2000 9:44 AM
To: Alexander, Michael S
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Monday's PHC
excellent start on the settlement presentation. can you can mike
and i talk
at
noon about it?
- April Briefing for CPUC.doc
=====================================
|
1,471 |
Subject: Tomorrow's Staff Meeting & Conference Call *cancelled*
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/10972.
=====================================
As you all are probably already aware, the Staff meeting/conference call has
been cancelled per Paul for this week.
Joseph
---------------------- Forwarded by Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron on 04/11/2001 12:21
PM ---------------------------
Paul Kaufman@ECT
04/09/2001 05:39 PM
To: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron@Enron, [email protected]@ECT
Subject: Meeting to Discuss California Plan
I'd like to have a face-to-face Western States meeting on Thursday afternoon
(of this week).
Topics for discussion include:
1. The "California Plan" that Jeff and I must provide to Rick. I'll
circulate a draft later this week.
2. Budget and Budget Reductions
3. Mid-year PRC
4. Work load
LYSA: PLEASE CONTACT EVERYONE IN THE GROUP TO DETERMINE THEIR AVAILABILITY
FOR A 2-HOUR MEETING ON THURSDAY AFTERNOON IN SFO TO BEGIN AT 3:30 AND END AT
5:30.
JOSEPH: PLEASE CANCEL THE STAFF MEETING ON THURSDAY MORNING. ALSO ... IS
THERE A CONFERENCE ROOM AVAILABLE ON FRIDAY AFTERNOON AT 3:30 OR SO?
=====================================
|
1,472 |
Subject: MPAR - Executive Briefing Materials
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/8202.
=====================================
Executive Team:
By now I trust you have had a chance to review the following briefing
materials:
> Olympus Quick Tour CD-ROM
> Navigation Exercise
> Section I of the Olympus simulation manual
> Harvard Business Review articles:
1. "Introduction to Financial Ratios and Financial Statement Analysis"
2. "Assessing a Company's Future Financial Health"
3. "What is Strategy"
4. "Customer Intimacy and Other Value Disciplines"
During our pre-session meeting next week, we will be exploring in greater
detail the Olympus simulation environment. As you are aware from the agenda,
we will be immersed in the simulation over the weekend.
The following link is to an additional article from McKinsey Quarterly which
I think captures well the strategic and financial issues you'll face in the
Olympus simulation.
http://mckinseyquarterly.com/pdf/whis00.pdf?tk=:932: (you will need Adobe
Acrobat to view this article)
I look forward to meeting you next week.
Francois Thrower
Vice President
Strategic Management Group, Inc.
900 Kearny Street, Suite 750
San Francisco, CA 94109
415.956.7223
=====================================
|
1,473 |
Subject: Re: your famous...
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/1042.
=====================================
hey darlin' (that's Texas talk). how are ya? so good to hear from you.
hear you and JC are landed gentry over there in berkeley. next thing you
know, you'll be complaining about homeless people and how they're bringing
property values down. (tee hee) love to see you guys some time. what about
this godfersaken election????
if you have a copy of the Berkeleyan, I'd love to get one. My address is:
Jeff
Enron Corp
101 California St., Suite 1950
SF, CA 94111
How's the Chancelor?
Hugs and kisses,
Jeff
Patricia Cruse <[email protected]>
11/17/2000 11:25 AM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: your famous...
Hey Jeff,
What a surprise -- yesterday I was looking at the latest "Berkeleyan" and
on page three there you were! Have you seen the picture? It is from the
electricity summit. It is a picture of you and a guy that looks like Burl
Ives -- It sort of looks like he is telling you an off color joke. (It
also says that you are director of enron corp.!) Anyway, it was great
treat to see you in the local rag. Brightened my day.
tc
=====================================
|
1,474 |
Subject: NEWS: lawsuit against FERC
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/12134.
=====================================
* from Govt Affairs
---------------------- Forwarded by Jennifer Rudolph/HOU/EES on 05/07/2001
04:40 PM ---------------------------
Susan J Mara@ENRON
05/07/2001 04:34 PM
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 05/07/2001 02:27 PM -----
Scott Govenar <[email protected]>
05/07/2001 01:44 PM
Senate President Pro Tempore John Burton and Assembly Speaker Robert
Hertzberg held a press conference moments ago to announce the joint
filing of a lawsuit against FERC. The lawsuit will seek to mandate FERC
to prospectively limit the amounts charged by generators and marketers
and establish a refund program for recouping over-charges. The suit
will be brought either in California District Court or the 9th Circuit
Court within the next seven days. They expect the suit to be resolved
within the next three months. The attorney handling the case will be
Joseph Cotchett who has agreed to represent the Legislature for $1.
I will fax a summary of the lawsuit to Houston, San Francisco and
Portland. If anyone else would like a copy please let me know by
e-mail.
=====================================
|
1,475 |
Subject: direct access
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/4300.
=====================================
good idea...
---------------------- Forwarded by Karen Denne/Corp/Enron on 04/13/2001
12:53 PM ---------------------------
"sandra" <[email protected]> on 04/11/2001 07:13:24 PM
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: direct access
Karen:
After we got off the phone, we had another idea re: messaging on direct
access that we thought we would share with you so that you could pass it on
during your next discussion with Peggy, Jim, Jeff, et.al.
Since Enron has a good relationship with Cisco Systems, would it be possible
to have John Chambers and Cisco deliver some of Enron's messages re: direct
access, i.e.
Like the UC and CSU system, Cisco entered into a contract with Enron for
energy services
Enron continues to honor its contract with Cisco, Cisco remains an Enron
customer.
Although PG&E now supplies the electrons instead of Enron, Cisco still pays
the same amount for its energy
Since the inception of the contract, Cisco has saved XXX million.
The legislature should restore direct access (SB27x) so that businesses can
continue to manage their energy costs
=====================================
|
1,476 |
Subject: Thanks.
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/12797.
=====================================
You guys are stars. Thanks so much for all you did for Prentice. I think
she had a really, really good time and felt really neat about the whole
thing. She's wonderful and you guys gave her the wonderful day that she
earned and deserved. Thanks so much.
And, as usual, thanks for being great hosts yesterday (Nancy, you outdid
yourself with dinner).
OK, so I am doing everything that I can to leave for the Dome Wednesday
night. If you guys want, we can pack up the Suburban with everything that
needs to go up ( or at least just about everything), and we can drive it up
and then you two can take my SAAB up. Then, coming back, you can drive the
Suburban and I can drive the SAAB. What do you think?
Finally, Eldon, do you have the Blue Book at your house? I'm looking for the
number of someone I can get to haul away all the crap (junk from around the
generator shed, that rotten ol' pile of wood by the driveway, the
un-salvagable wood from the old deck, etc.). Can you find a couple "hauler"
numbers in there and send me the numbers? Thanks a million.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
1,477 |
Subject: RE: California Treasurers Calls on Lynch to Immediately Set DA
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/824.
=====================================
What are we doing re this? CAn we get Hanson to help?
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 5:02 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff; Kean, Steven J.; Shapiro, Richard; Steffes, James D.; Kaufman, Paul; Mara, Susan; Calger, Christopher F.; Tycholiz, Barry; Richter, Jeff; Belden, Tim; Comnes, Alan; Swain, Steve; Sharp, Vicki; Blachman, Jeremy; Dietrich, Janet; Delainey, David; Leff, Dan; Hughes, Evan; Herod, Brenda F.; Parquet, David; Frazier, Lamar; Denne, Karen; O'Neil, Murray P.; Huddleson, Diann
Cc: Alamo, Joseph
Subject: California Treasurers Calls on Lynch to Immediately Set DA Suspension Date Back to July 1
The state treasurer sent a letter this afternoon to Loretta Lynch.
The treasurer claims in the letter that, by extending DA through Sept. 20th, the PUC could have shifted more than $8 billion to small customers.
He urges Lynch to immediately roll back the date to July 1.
We have started working with large customers to refute the letter.
If you would like a copy of the letter, please send your fax number to Joseph Alamo.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
1,478 |
Subject: Re: Hogan/LECG Report on California Market?
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/1197.
=====================================
You bet. Got your and Fran's messages. If you'd like to discuss by phone,
I'm in all day. Otherwise, I suggest that we do take the following next
steps:
Just as soon as you have the proposal and list of participants drafted (which
I hope will be very soon), please forward to me.
Then, as quickly as possible, I'd like to have a meeting to discuss and
finalize the proposal. It would be very useful if Laura Tyson could be in on
that final meeting, and, of course, any other of the participants that you'd
like to invite.
We're are somewhat behind the eight ball due to the delays thus far in
getting this thing off the ground. If we're going to do it, it's going to
have to come together quickly, and the report will have to be developed very
quickly, too. Hope that will be possible.
I'm assuming at this point that you and I are proceeding ahead absent Mitch
and Carl, since they have sensitive issues with their clients that we can't
seem to overcome?
And I'll inquire about the need for expert witnesses in the class action
suit and get back to you.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
1,479 |
Subject: Section reading
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/mba__macroeconomics/36.
=====================================
Hi everyone,
For this Saturday's section, I would like you guys to read (if you
haven't already) the article "Restructuring gives Japan's workers
culture shock: Radical cuts by Nissan's French boss have wide
implications for Japan's jobs-for-life practices"
from the 11/3 Fin. Times.
Please think about how you might answer the following questions:
1. Should the government extend unemployment benefits to the laid off
workers from Nissan?
2. Why have Japanes companies paid younger workers less, and older
workers more, Does this policy make sense?
3. Should Nissan consider lowering the wages of some workers in order to
layoff fewer workers?
I have attached a word 6.0 version of the article. Also please note
that section is in C135.
In addition I will try to discuss questions on Ghana, Ireland and Brazil
that Prof. Levine sent out.
Also I have attached an article on asset prices and inflation targetting
(from the FT) which discusses the dangers of "debt deflation". If we
have time I might discuss this as well.
See you on Saturday.
Bhash
- asset prices.doc
- Nissan.doc
=====================================
|
1,480 |
Subject: FW: Gas Accord II California Production Meeting
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/2836.
=====================================
Resending
-----Original Message-----
From: MBD
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2000 1:35 PM
To: 'Jeff Dasovich Enron SF'
Subject: FW: Gas Accord II California Production Meeting
Jeff, PG&E just sent this to me. Are you aware of what material they are
distributing regarding this Enron contract? Mike Day
-----Original Message-----
From: Dowling, Susan [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2000 1:00 PM
To: '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'
Subject: Gas Accord II California Production Meeting
Mike Day, Counsel representing Enron
Kirit Purbhoo, Senior Specialist, Enron Energy Services
As members representing Enron in the Gas Accord II, I wanted to let you know
that we sent the
following letter and attachments to Enron's California Production Contact,
C.B. Lackey last
week. If you plan to attend the meeting in Sacramento, please let us know.
Sincerely,
Rod Boschee/Susan Dowling
> <<LtrCIPAmtg102500.doc>> <<CIPA Issues Comment Letter 9-28-00.doc>>
> <<CPUC Rule 51.doc>>
>
- LtrCIPAmtg102500.doc
- CIPA Issues Comment Letter 9-28-00.doc
- CPUC Rule 51.doc
=====================================
|
1,481 |
Subject: nan
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/12438.
=====================================
----- Forwarded by Bernadette Hawkins/Corp/Enron on 06/20/2001 03:34 PM -----
Ray Alvarez
06/20/2001 03:15 PM
To: Bernadette Hawkins/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject:
PLEASE MARK YOUR CALENDAR- NEW TIME
Date: Every Thursday
Time: 7:30 pm Pacific, 9:30 pm Central, and 10:30 pm Eastern time,
Number: 1-888-271-0949
Host Code: 661877 (for Ray only)
Participant Code: 936022 (for everyone else)
The table of the on-going FERC issues and proceedings will be updated for use
on tomorrow morning's conference call, and distributed by Bernadette
Hawkins. It is available to all team members on the O drive. Please feel
free to revise/add to/ update this table as appropriate.
Proposed agenda for 6/21 teleconference:
Draft message points to FERC staff
June 19 Order on Rehearing of the April 26 Order
Motion to strike SCE's supplemental request for rehearing
Morgan Stanley / Dean Witter "ATC complaint"
CA Energy Oversight Board motion to waive underscheduling penalty
Please feel free to communicate to the group any additional agenda items you
may have.
Ray
=====================================
|
1,482 |
Subject: Re: Out of the Office
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/3875.
=====================================
Thanks so much. You in LA? I'll be working very little while I'm away. Wee
bit of computer. Couple of phone calls. Lots of rest. have a great weekend.
Best,
Jeff
Karen Denne
03/23/2001 09:33 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: Out of the Office
GOOD FOR YOU!!! Enjoy, and try to have an Enron-free vacation!
From: Jeff Dasovich on 03/23/2001 07:50 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, [email protected], Karen
Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, [email protected], Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON,
Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Scott Govenar <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected], Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Maureen
McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron, Joseph
Alamo/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Out of the Office
Greetings:
I'll be out on vacation all next week, but will be periodically checking
voicemail and email.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
1,483 |
Subject: RE:
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/29257.
=====================================
its a WP doc. so detach and save first. then open from the folder where
you saved it. word will then convert it from wp to word and let you open
it. if you have problems, let me know.
best,
jeff
Karen Denne/ENRON@enronXgate
07/30/2001 02:26 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: RE:
I can't open it. Didn't you tell me last week there was some trick to
getting these documents open?
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 2:23 PM
To: Denne, Karen
Subject: RE:
wow. ok. that works with me. you read the new, amended complaint? pretty
tough stuff, which is the only option they've left us....
Karen Denne/ENRON@enronXgate 07/30/2001 02:16 PM To: Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: RE:
Meeting will be on Wednesday. Still compiling everyone's schedule -- did you
know Steve was on vacation this week?
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 2:16 PM
To: Denne, Karen
Subject:
we have time yet for tomorrow's meeting re: contempt stuff?
=====================================
|
1,484 |
Subject: Coffee with Rebecca Smith
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/2205.
=====================================
Just spent about 90 minutes with Rebecca. She left with a very good
understanding of our view of the problem and the solutions. She also spent
time asking me how I thought other players would respond to the IOU request
for a big check to cover the undercollections.
She expects to have a "big picture" story--covering AB 1890s past, present &
future--completed in the next couple of weeks. In Rebecca's words, she wants
the story to "shake things up." She's very upset with how the utilities are
handling it. I told her we were less concerned with "he said/she said" and
more concerned with finding real short and long term solutions that are fair
to everyone.
Mark and Karen: In my long history with Rebecca, it has always been
understood that our conversations are off the record and background.
Invariably, at the end of the conversation, Rebecca tells me that she intends
to call later and cajole the daylights out of me in an attempt to use some of
my more colorful quotes. It was no different this time.
If anyone wants more details, just let me know.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
1,485 |
Subject: RE: DA court appeal
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['Jeff', 'Dasovich', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/2196.
=====================================
Greetings folks. The folks doing the appeal have asked me to inquire if you folks would be willing to sign on. They understand (as do we) that the likelihood of prevailing is slim, but feel that beating the drum is important in continued effort to maintain current DA status and to attempt to preserve it going forward. (DA seems to need all the help it can muster given that Karl Wood and Bob Barnett appear to have control of the issue at the PUC.) Could you let me know either way if you'll sign on. Dorothy, talked to Keith yesterday, who said you'd be making the call on this one. Thanks a bunch.
Best,
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Dorothy Rothrock [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 7:03 PM
To: Keith McCrea; Evelyn Elsesser; dcarroll; William Booth
Cc: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: DA court appeal
Hello lawyers,
Attached is a draft of an appeal to the Sup Ct. of the CPUC's decision
to suspend DA. The authors would like review and comment and to
consider joining the petition. Comments back to Jeff Dasovich asap, they
want to file by Nov 9.
Dot
=====================================
|
1,486 |
Subject: FW: Proposed revisions to CSA Letter
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/2396.
=====================================
Here are some edits to our letter from socal. I do not feel they diminsh
the usefulness of the letter, and they moderate the tone a little, as you
would expect. They also eliminate the lengthy recitation of the procedural
events at the end of the letter. If this gets them on the letter, I say
let's sign. I will assume everyone who signed on last week stays on the
letter unless I hear differently from you by 3 pm today. I really
appreciate the quick turnaround. Mike Day
-----Original Message-----
From: Wright, Gillian - TP1GXW [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 10:26 AM
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: Proposed revisions to CSA Letter
Mike,
Here are SoCal's proposed revisions to the CSA letter - I'll call in a
minute. The edits are pretty extensive, but all along the lines we
discussed (ie changing the tone to a more positive one).
Gillian
<<CSA Letter SCG.doc>>
Gillian A. Wright
Regulatory Case Manager
Sempra Energy
555 W. Fifth St. GT14D6
Los Angeles, CA 90013-1011
(213) 244-3833
(213) 244-8820 fax
[email protected]
- CSA Letter SCG.doc
=====================================
|
1,487 |
Subject: CPUC
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/998.
=====================================
Jeff:
I've spoken with Keith and Dan and have put in calls to Evie and Bill.
We're all trying to figure out what to do and how to approach the CPUC.
In Enron's letter to President Lynch and the utilities, Enron's states
that "we plan to submit within the next week DASRs to the utilities to
effect the return of a portion of our customer base to bundled utility
service and to transition some of our other customers to alternative
ESPs at the request of such customers". Since the letter was dated this
Monday, Dec. 3, that means Enron - as of Monday - was going to start
de-DASRs or switches to new ESPs by next Monday, Dec. 10, or even
earlier.
Is Enron still on this accelerated time schedule for switching to new
ESPs or de-DASRs? I read this to mean Enron will literally exist the
direct access market for all its customers no later than Monday, Dec.
3. Was something else intended? Has this schedule slowed down at all?
I think that if the CPUC believes Enron is really leaving by Monday, it
is just going to do nothing. What should I tell the CPUC re Enron's
schedule?
Thanks,
Dian
=====================================
|
1,488 |
Subject: RE: Gas
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/608.
=====================================
Jeff,
No problem with joining us on the conference call Wednesday. In fact I intended to call you today for your opinion of the Proposed Decision. I'll send you the meeting notice as soon as we finalize the time--tentatively its set for Wednesday at 9:00 AM your time and 11:00 Houston/Omaha time.
Lynn Blair from our Market Services groups will be attending the "Windows" meeting. I'll pass your request on to her.
Glen
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 6:02 PM
To: Hass, Glen
Subject: Gas
Hi Glen:
Two things. 1) If you'd like me to join in on the call on Wednesday to determine what TW should do regarding the re-surfacing of the SoCal settlement, I'd be happy to join. Just let me know. 2) Are you going to the SoCal "no more windows" meeting on Thursday? I'd planned to go but it looks like I might have a conflict now. I'd like to get a copy of anything they hand out at the meeting. And if anyone provides any summaries, that would also be useful. Let me know if you plan to attend. If you don't, know sweat.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
1,489 |
Subject: RE: Haas goes to NYC
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/2504.
=====================================
While it sounds like a heavenly trip, and I miss Deepika oh so much :), the
chance of me actually being able to swing it is very slim. Sad.
This may sound odd, but I'm looking forward to the MPAR retreat. I miss
seeing you all (except for Paul, of course, since we spend hours on end
creating this ludicrous business plan). We'll take Santa Cruz by storm! Or
at least get drunk together.
Deepika - I hope NYC is awesome! Let's catch up soon friend.
Blake
-----Original Message-----
From: Jacqueline Kelly [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2000 10:38 AM
To: Aiaz Kazi (E-mail 2); Blake Wise (E-mail); Chris Neale (E-mail 2);
Courtney Abernath (E-mail); Jeff Dasovich (E-mail); Paul Brodie
(E-mail); [email protected]
Cc: Deepika Shah (E-mail)
Subject: Haas goes to NYC
I am in the planning stages of the Haas field trip to NYC to visit Deepika!
It looks like the second weekend of November is best for her - perfect time
to start your Christmas shopping! It would be a lot of fun if we got a big
group to go! Let me now if you are interested in going!!
-Jackie
=====================================
|
1,490 |
Subject: Re: Coalition for Energy Action
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/27904.
=====================================
Yes, they came to the last IEP meeting with a proposal for an ad campaign.
They would like IEP to help fund. The people who came were those working on
the campaign -- not the organizations sponsoring it. I can get the names of
the PR/ad people if you like.
Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
Jeff Dasovich
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
06/18/2001 01:43 PM
To: Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: Coalition for Energy Action
I can poke around---most of the associations in that group are in the
negotiations I'm stuck in. I'll let you know what I hear.
Best,
Jeff
Karen Denne
06/15/2001 09:49 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Coalition for Energy Action
Do we have any contact w/ the Coalition for Energy Action -- the new business
group led by the California Chamber? We need to be part of that group to at
least know what they're doing and what messages they're spinning. Let me
know, and we can add them into our target CEO database. thx.kd
=====================================
|
1,491 |
Subject: Re: What to do about CDWR?
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/4740.
=====================================
I agree.
James D Steffes
05/24/2001 04:04 PM
To: Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron, Paul Kaufman/Enron@EnronXGate, Alan Comnes/Enron@EnronXGate,
Ray Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON, Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Michael Tribolet/ENRON@enronXgate
cc: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: What to do about CDWR?
Given that we are already well into the Summer of '01, it now appears that
further CDWR contracting will only lock CA into high prices. The original
idea was that CDWR could buy power at $80/mwh and ensure that retail rates
wouldn't go higher. Neither of these concepts have held true.
I think that Enron needs to consider actively oppossing any further
contracting and a bond issuance in light of the potential harm that CDWR will
do. First, the prices they are getting won't be great for customers.
Second, with the "new" stranded costs that will be created, direct access in
the future won't have a chance.
Appreciate everyone's thoughts?
Jim
=====================================
|
1,492 |
Subject: RE: SUMMARY OF PUC INVESTIGATION INTO ENRON
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/2412.
=====================================
Thanks. Hanging in there about as well as everyone is. No worries on getting back to me. Just wanted to keep folks in the loop. Been in contact with the desk. Best of luck with the transaction. Enjoy the time off. Talk to you in a couple days.
Best,
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Belden, Tim
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 8:59 AM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: Re: SUMMARY OF PUC INVESTIGATION INTO ENRON
Jeff,
Thanks for this and all of the prior updates. Thanks als for the calls last week, or was it the week prior. The last couple of weeks have been brutal. Hopefully things get better from here.
I have been leaving the day to day management of the ees/iso situation in the capable hands of steve hall and jeff richter. So far so good, although I hope that the ees sales team can get a deal done soon.
I'm taking the next couple of days off. I'll call you towards the end of the week t catch up. Sorry I've been so hard to reach.
I hope that you are hanging in there.
Tim
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)
=====================================
|
1,493 |
Subject: PLEASE READ AND RESPOND
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/1707.
=====================================
Please see the attached, from Sue Nord, and respond by Friday, September 29.
Ginger Dernehl
Government Affairs-The Americas
713-853-7751
----- Forwarded by Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron on 09/25/2000 12:32 PM -----
Sue Nord
09/25/2000 12:31 PM
To: Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: PLEASE READ AND RESPONED
As Rick mentioned at the staff meeting in DC, we are compiling a list of
suggested names for Presidential appointments under either a Bush or a Gore
administration. Please forward your suggestions, along with a sentence or
two explaining why you are recommending an individual, no later than Friday,
September 29. Also, if there are potential candidates about whom we should
be concerned, please forward that information.
The attached documents describe the current make-up of various federal
commissions, including the party affiliation and term dates for current
members. Cabinet and agency appointments are listed as well.
Please send your recommendations directly to Ginger, either in hard copy or
electronically. Thanks in advance for your input.
=====================================
|
1,494 |
Subject: REMINDER- UC Berkeley Business Plan Competition Launch
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: []
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/3136.
=====================================
REMINDER...? TOMORROW IS THE
???????3rd Annual UC BERKELEY BUSINESS PLAN COMPETITION LAUNCH
??November 8 - 6pm, Andersen Auditorium (Haas School of Business).? Come
early, seats will fill quickly!
This is your opportunity to:
Learn about the Competition
Meet potential team members at the post-launch MIXER
Learn the rules on how to enter to win $50K
No other event on campus gives you:
Access to leading VCs and Valley business leaders
Written feedback your business idea from a VC judge well versed in your
industry
Hands-on workshops and a mentor that provide you the tools every
entrepreneur needs
Don't miss your opportunity to turn a business idea into a fundable venture
- Past participants have received over $91m in funding.
?
Or- if you can't attend the launch, come to our first workshops:
?
Business Models with Christine Comaford, Partner, Artemis Ventures
November 13 4-6pm, Andersen Auditorium
?
Opportunity Recognition- Drew Issacs, President, California Technology
International
November 20, 4-6pm, Andersent Auditorium
http://bplan.berkeley.edu
=====================================
|
1,495 |
Subject: RE: email lists
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/93.
=====================================
Many of these people are already on my list. I'll add the ones who are not.
-----Original Message-----
From: Rudolph, Jennifer
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 7:42 AM
To: Dasovich, Jeff; Mara, Susan
Subject: email lists
Greetings!
With the last re-org, I am back in the California market. I was in the NJ market for the summer....a summer hiatus, if you will...now, I am assigned to the West which includes both TX and CA. fun, fun!
I need to get back on your distribution lists for interesting insights into the CA Govt and Regulatory systems.
However, in an effort to reduce the amount of duplication (instead of me turning around and sending it to you again as well as the Originators), please let me know if you can add the following to your lists:
Jennifer Rudolph
Mark Reese
Lamar Frazier
Ed Hamb
Kevin Keeney
Maria Martinez
Ian McAbeer
Michele Sorensen
George Waidelich
John McMullan
Juan Samudio
Sean Dookie
Sue Ewing
Derek Kelly
Ron Mentan
Cheryl Morgan-Dorsey
Aida O'Neal
All are either Origination or Structuring people.
Again, please let me know.
---Jennifer
713-345-8206
=====================================
|
1,496 |
Subject: RE: APPA
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/gspp_conference/14.
=====================================
Well if that's your position we're clear. I had already contacted Columbia
Energy and APPA and they were both interested so I'll continue to contact a
couple others. I think those two offered a total of $5000. I may get a few
thousand more, but that may all add up to half. It depends on how long an
event
and how many speakers we get.
The Dean is still on vacation but hopefully the school will contact you soon.
Rob
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [SMTP:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2000 4:38 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: APPA
>
>
> When's a good time to discuss? I'd like to get as diverse a group of
> co-sponsors as possible, and as many as possible.
>
>
>
>
> [email protected] on 08/16/2000 07:00:30 AM
>
> To: [email protected]
> cc:
> Subject: APPA
>
>
> Jeff,
> A GSPP alum at APPA is interesting in co-sponsoring the GSPP forum. Any
> objection? I won't contact others until we discuss Enron's position on
> co-sponsorship.
> Rob
>
> Rob Gramlich
> PJM Market Monitoring Unit
> (610) 666-4291
> [email protected]
>
>
>
>
=====================================
|
1,497 |
Subject: RE: SCE Negative CTC Claim
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/647.
=====================================
Thanks.
-----Original Message-----
From: Williams, Robert C.
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 3:31 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff; '[email protected]'; Mara, Susan; '[email protected]'; Steffes, James D.
Cc: Sharp, Vicki; Sanders, Richard B.
Subject: SCE Negative CTC Claim
Mike Day believes that SCE might agree to a new Stipulation in which they commit to pay our claim if their new deal and their pending Advice Letter are approved by the CPUC. I have scheduled a call for tomorrow at 12:30 CST to discuss the terms we would like to see in the Stipulation (e.g., drop approval of the Advice Letter as a condition, payment within 10 days after CPUC approval, agreement on the number set forth in our response to their Data Request, agreement to apply accrued negative CTC credits to current T&D charges, to name a few). On the other hand a delay in this proceeding is probably in our interest, in view of the SCE Counterclaim. Going this route would probably be in lieu of some of the other alternatives we discussed, so I believe we will need to get senior management't approval to any agreement.
=====================================
|
1,498 |
Subject: To help you prepare for the Energy Efficiency Conference
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/263.
=====================================
Dear Colleagues:
Enlightened Energy Solutions (EES) is working with the Silicon Valley
Manufacturing Group to make the upcoming August 24th Energy Conference a
productive and interactive event. At the conference, EES will present The
Enlightened Energy Approach: Energy Reliability at the Lowest Unit Cost, an
integrated, comprehensive methodology to assess and maximize supply- and
demand-side efficiencies and leverage energy prices.
In advance of the conference, we would like to give you an opportunity to
help direct our discussions to better meet your needs. In the attached
document you can identify how critical energy reliability and price are to
your company. When you return this document, EES will work with you in
breakout session 8B (Creating an Energy Plan for Silicon Valley) to tailor a
technical, economic, and structural game plan to your company?s business
requirements. All information will be kept strictly confidential.
Please open the attachment and complete the very brief questionnaire.
Please send completed document to Paul Sidorenko at [email protected]
Thank you!
=====================================
|
1,499 |
Subject: To help you prepare for the Energy Efficiency Conference
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/1183.
=====================================
Dear Colleagues:
Enlightened Energy Solutions (EES) is working with the Silicon Valley
Manufacturing Group to make the upcoming August 24th Energy Conference a
productive and interactive event. At the conference, EES will present The
Enlightened Energy Approach: Energy Reliability at the Lowest Unit Cost, an
integrated, comprehensive methodology to assess and maximize supply- and
demand-side efficiencies and leverage energy prices.
In advance of the conference, we would like to give you an opportunity to
help direct our discussions to better meet your needs. In the attached
document you can identify how critical energy reliability and price are to
your company. When you return this document, EES will work with you in
breakout session 8B (Creating an Energy Plan for Silicon Valley) to tailor a
technical, economic, and structural game plan to your company's business
requirements. All information will be kept strictly confidential.
Please open the attachment and complete the very brief questionnaire.
Please send completed document to Paul Sidorenko at [email protected]
Thank you!
=====================================
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.