dataset_id
int64 0
5.47k
| email_body
stringlengths 800
9.73k
|
|---|---|
1,500 |
Subject: Tickets for the Secretary Summers Address on 12/6
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/1182.
=====================================
could you pick my ticket up for me?
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 11/29/2000 06:49 PM -----
"Dean's Office" <[email protected]>
Sent by: [email protected]
11/29/2000 06:22 PM
Please respond to "Dean's Office"
To: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected]
cc:
Subject: Tickets for the Secretary Summers Address on 12/6
Dear Haas Students,
We still have many unclaimed tickets left for the Secretary Summers
Research Dialogue Program "Keeping the Economy Growing" at 1:45 on Tuesday,
December 6 in the Andersen Auditorium.
The deadline for Haas students to pick up tickets for this event is this
Friday, December 1 at 2pm.
After the Friday deadline, we will offer all of the unclaimed tickets to
other Cal students who have been clamoring for these tickets.
The Dean's Office is open from 9am to 5pm daily and Evening MBA students
can pick up their tickets at the EMBA Office after 5pm.
Thanks for your cooperation!
The Dean's Staff
=====================================
|
1,501 |
Subject: Negotiating Skills - SOLD OUT!
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/904.
=====================================
Dear SVMG Member -
Last Friday at 1pm, we sent out an e-mail to you announcing a second
opportunity to participate in our Negotiating Skills Workshop, scheduled for
April 17, 2002.
By the close of business last Friday, the April 17 Workshop is also sold
out! That is the bad news. The GOOD NEWS is that the instructor - Joe
Crowley - and our host, Compaq (thanks Shawna Holmes!) have graciously
agreed to offer a second day - April 18 - for an additional class.
As you know, we first offered this Workshop a few weeks ago, to a sold out
group, and it was overwhelmingly popular.
Therefore, we are pleased to announce a third opportunity to participate in
the NEGOTIATING SKILLS WORKSHOP. Once again, it is open to the first 20
RSVP's that we receive.
Details for this additional class are as follows:
DATE: April 18, 2002
TIME: 8am until 5pm
PLACE: Compaq Computer
COST: $250 covers the instruction, workbook, continental breakfast and light
lunch.
To sign up for the April 18 date, please respond to this e-mail as soon as
possible. And thanks again for your interest.
Best wishes,
Carl
=====================================
|
1,502 |
Subject: Outage Coordination
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/2967.
=====================================
PLEASE FORWARD TO THE PERSON IN CHARGE OF YOUR OUTAGE CO-ORDINATION
To Outage Coordinators :
Effective June 8 2001, in accordance with Executive Order D-23-01, the ISO
will be implementing the Interim SLIC Outage Web Page (
https://slic.caiso.com ). This will be the primary means of reporting
planned outages to the ISO. After June 8, 2001, the current fax, telephone
and e-mail method of reporting will still be available for emergency use
only.
The updated SLIC users manual (with screen shots) is now available on our
website at the following URL
<http://www.caiso.com/docs/2001/03/29/2001032906410829431.html>.
The XML Upload/ Download Specification will be available and posted to the
website on 5/25/01. As stated above, the implementation date will occur 2
weeks later on June 8, 2001.
For your final testing and integration processes, outages may be reported to
the CAISO in parallel via the web page and your normal reporting method for
the next two weeks.
Any questions please contact Michael Martin at [email protected].
Client Relations Communication
[email protected]
=====================================
|
1,503 |
Subject: Feedback on Bidding
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/906.
=====================================
<html>
Hi Students,<br>
<br>
<b><u>Ignore this if you are graduating this Semester or did not Bid for
classes.<br>
<br>
<br>
</u></b>Now that bidding is over and you are enrolled in classes we would
like to get some feedback on the bidding process, and the On-Line
Registrar application itself:<br>
<br>
<br>
1. Overall how would you rate the new registration process?<br>
<br>
2. Which do you like better, the On-Line Registrar, or Telebears?<br>
<br>
3. Any suggestions for the administrative process? ie scheduling,
distribution of information ect..<br>
<br>
4. Any suggestions about the computer application, On-Line
Registrar?<br>
<br>
5. Any further insight or comments would be greatly appreciated.<br>
<br>
6. Would you rather receive program materials via email or postal
mail?<br>
<br>
Please be honest, you won't hurt our feelings, and it won't hurt your
chances of getting into classes. I promise. This program is supposed to
make things easier for you, so please help us make it run as smoothly as
possible.<br>
<br>
Thanks, <br>
Josh Bortman<br>
EWMBA Program<br>
<br>
</html>
=====================================
|
1,504 |
Subject: RE: LA Chamber
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/13098.
=====================================
Info on the chamber speaking engagement...
---------------------- Forwarded by Karen Denne/Corp/Enron on 05/25/2001
05:00 PM ---------------------------
Sandra Yamane <[email protected]> on 05/25/2001 01:29:48 PM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: LA Chamber
Karen:
Regarding the LA Chamber, Jeff should know that So Cal Edison drives their
energy policy. Steve Franks is in regular communication with the Chamber
staff.
The LA Chamber has lobbied Sacramento legislators urging them to support
Edison positions.
I have a call into my contact at Wal-Mart -- they didn't call yesterday. As
soon as I hear something, I will let you know. In the meantime, I will fax
a copy of the solutions paper to him for review.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 11:22 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: LA Chamber
Sandra -- Any other info Jeff Dasovich needs for Tuesday's chamber meeting?
Also, any further word on attendees for Tuesday's meeting w/ the prez?
Thanks! kd
=====================================
|
1,505 |
Subject: FW: Committee on Ways and Means
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/12615.
=====================================
Please fax a support letter (draft letter attached) to the Members of the
Ways and Means Committee as well as the authors, HR 778 Cunningham, and HR
1045 Wilson and Issa. These are important measures that 1) recognize CHP in
buildings as an energy efficiency measure and create valuable tax incentives
for DER among other things. There will hearings on these bills in Ways and
Means on Tue and Wed June 12 and 13. Please call if you have any questions.
Steven A. Greenberg
Sr. Energy Officer
RealEnergy, Inc.
300 Capitol Mall, Suite 120
Sacramento, CA 95814
916-325-2500
916-325-0451 fax
www.realenergy.com
This electronic mail transmission contains confidential information intended
only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, copying, or disclosure
by any other person is strictly prohibited. If you received this
transmission in error, please notify the sender by telephone at
(310)277-7000 or send an electronic mail message to
[email protected].
- Committee on Ways and Means.doc
- HR 788 & 1045 Support Letter.doc
- HR 1045 ISSA and Wilson Bill.pdf
- HR 778.pdf
=====================================
|
1,506 |
Subject: Re: Reminder letter for California filing deadline
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/4047.
=====================================
Sir:
Regarding the communications you keep sending to this office, be it via=20
e-mail, regular mail or whatever means you seem to deem necessary, as in th=
e=20
attached, please note:
The following individuals herein are not registered lobbyists =01) for Enro=
n nor=20
anyone else =01) and should henceforth not be considered as such: Jeff=20
Dasovich, Sandi McCubbin, or Susan Mara.
Please cease your communications to the above-referenced individuals=20
immediately.
Your prompt implementation of this request would be sincerely appreciated.
Thanks,
Joseph Alamo
From: Jeff Dasovich on 04/24/2001 10:00 AM CDT
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: =20
Subject: Reminder letter for California filing deadline
Hi. Is there a reason I keep getting this stuff from these guys.
Sincerely,
Clueless
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 04/24/2001 09:54 AM -----
[email protected]
=0904/23/2001 08:07 PM
=09=09=20
=09=09 To: [email protected]
=09=09 cc:=20
=09=09 Subject: Reminder letter for California filing deadline
- dasovich.rl.ca.4-23-01.DOC
=====================================
|
1,507 |
Subject: Re: Please Respond
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/13398.
=====================================
I'll need clubs, and I'm right handed. Thanks so much.
Best,
Jeff
Ginger Dernehl
06/06/2001 09:49 AM
To: Rob Bradley/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tom Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron, Tom
Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, John
Hardy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Robert Hemstock/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Patrick Keene/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan M
Landwehr/NA/Enron@Enron, Donald Lassere/NA/Enron@Enron, Dave
Mangskau/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steve Montovano/NA/Enron@Enron, Mona L
Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, Frank Rishe/NA/Enron@Enron, Mike
Roan/ENRON@enronXgate, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Pat Shortridge/Corp/Enron@Enron, Dan
Staines/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kerry Stroup/NA/Enron@Enron, Fino Tiberi/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Thane Twiggs/Enron@EnronXGate
cc:
Subject: Please Respond
Howdy Golfers,
I need some information before you all play your "par" game of golf next week.
1) Will you be bringing your own golf clubs?
2) If I need to reserve clubs for you, please let me know if you are right or
left handed.
Thanks!!!!!!
gngr
713-853-7751
=====================================
|
1,508 |
Subject: Restructuring Conference Publicity
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/1042.
=====================================
Dear Jeff,
We have very strong registrations for the Energy Restructuring in
California conference and will have a very interesting audience in addition
to our excellent faculty.
Here is an easy way to let your clients, colleagues, and associates know
about the conference and your role as a member of the faculty. Simply
delete the first part of this email message and forward the remainder to
the people of your choice. Feel free to edit the message.
This is a service we offer to faculty members who want to help publicize
the conference. It is not a requirement.
Best regards,
Karl Craine
Executive Director
///
This is just a short note to let you know that I will be speaking at Energy
Restructuring in California conference that will take place on November 2
and 3, 2000, in San Francisco. It should be an excellent program for anyone
dealing with dealing with California's transition to competitive energy
markets.
For more information, follow this link:
http://www.lawseminars.com/htmls/seminars/00resca. You also can call Law
Seminars International at (206) 621-1938 or (800) 854-8009.
=====================================
|
1,509 |
Subject: Nord Pool
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/8034.
=====================================
Jeff,
A couple of presentations attached which give you some quick info comparing
the Nordic market to others, notably UK. The first is a presentation
prepared for our Mexcian colleagues 18 months ago, drawing out key features
and success factors in selected liberalised markets, including Nord Pool.
The second overlaps a little with the first in terms of Nordic content and
compares the NP arrangements to the existing and proposed new UK
arrangements. This one is over 2 years old now. I would urge caution in
using both of them to the extent that they are (particularly the latter) a
little dated now.
One very good non-Enron comparative source (although again not completely up
to date), (sorted by market design issue rather than by market but including
plenty on Nord Pool) can be found at
http://www.ofgem.gov.uk/elarch/aback.htm. Open the document dated Feb 98,
comparing trading arrangements in "other countries" (than UK). This was
prepared by the regulator in the early phase of the redesign of the UK market.
Let us know if you need more help.
Regards
Philip Davies
=====================================
|
1,510 |
Subject: Re: you & me & ian
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/4118.
=====================================
let's talk and figure out a time. i'm off for school now.
Best,
jeff
=09Cameron Sellers <[email protected]>
=0904/12/2001 05:44 PM
=09=09=20
=09=09 To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
=09=09 cc:=20
=09=09 Subject: you & me & ian
I would love for you to meet our new VP of Professional Services (who is,
incidentally, now for all intents and purposes running our company). I
think you will love him. He is very interested in the idea of working with
Enron and I want you to meet him. Can we set up a dinner for the three of
us sometime in the next couple weeks? I know your schedule is busy with
school, so why don=01,t you tell me a couple nights that work (other than
Mondays) and I will make it work on our end. Please oh please.
Love,
Your Pal Cameron=20
P.S. Going to Colleen=01,s new (to me) place for some wine tonight. I=01,=
ll tell
her hello for you=01(
Cameron Sellers
Vice President, Business Development
PERFECT
1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210
Palo Alto, CA 94303
[email protected]
650.798.3366 (direct dial)
650.269.3366 (cell)
650.858.1095 (fax)
=====================================
|
1,511 |
Subject: FW: project question
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/3224.
=====================================
The roof was planned to go on AFTER the stadium was completed, just as the
case says. (In fact they actually completed the roof early but the stadium
was late so they were completed together.)
-----Original Message-----
From: Madhur Duggar [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2000 3:04 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Fwd: project question
>X-Sender: [email protected]
>X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2
>Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 19:19:50 -0800
>To: Madhur Duggar <[email protected]>, [email protected]
>From: Waseem Siddiqi <[email protected]>
>Subject: project question
>
>Just wanted to verify one detail regarding our project.
>
>It says that the estimated completion date is March 1999 with roof by Dec
>1999.
>If the stadium is to be completed by March 1999, shouldn't the roof be in
>by Dec 1998 ?
>This important as if it will either add 1 year to the NPV calculations or
not.
>
>Also reading up on safeco fields history, it did start operating by summer
>1999 so the roof
>must have been up way before that.
>
>thanks
>waseem
>
=====================================
|
1,512 |
Subject: RE: UK Government secundee to Enron?
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/12335.
=====================================
Paul Dawson - I suggest that you pick this up, a chance to ingratiate
yourself to Ian. I suggest you contact Ian and explore Edward Barker's
willingness to commute from LA to SF, on a nearly weekly basis. You might
tell Ian that we really have nothing of interest, i.e., no real presence, in
LA, but are willing to use him in SF (if nothing else, we made the offer,
which Ian will appreciate). I will not involve myself further, unless you
think I can add some value in communicating with Ian. thanks mcs
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: 25 June 2001 13:47
To: Shapiro, Richard
Cc: Kaufman, Paul; Dawson, Paul; Schroeder, Mark
Subject: Re: UK Government secundee to Enron?
If it's no cost to Enron, and if he's good and willing to commute to SF, and
if it would be beneficial to the Company, we could certainly use the help and
put him to work on interesting things.
But do we we want to infect someone with the lunacy of California regulation
and then potentially infect the UK? Seriously, we can make it work if folks
think that it makes sense.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
1,513 |
Subject: Re: Delay in circulating DWR Dash
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/10470.
=====================================
Did we (GA) recommend the extension? If so, nice recommendation. Given the
circumstances, it's a win-win, and still leaves us with the swaption to
exercise at a later date. Hope all is well. When I call, you're always in a
meeting. I will be on the leadership call tomorrow. Hope you're well.
Best,
Jeff
James D Steffes
03/28/2001 04:18 PM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Delay in circulating DWR Dash
FYI.
----- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 03/28/2001 04:17 PM -----
Tracy Ngo@ECT
03/28/2001 03:39 PM
To: Vladimir Gorny/Enron@EnronXGate, Frank Hayden/Enron@EnronXGate,
Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: William S Bradford/Enron@EnronXGate
Subject: Delay in circulating DWR Dash
Given the status of Phase I of DWR possibly being extended to the end of
April, we will not be circulating a DASH at this time for the five-year DWR
swaption. Will advise at a later date of any developments.
Thanks all for your help for now.
Regards,
Tracy
=====================================
|
1,514 |
Subject: Re: *Second Request*: Schedules Request for Week of February 19th
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/3296.
=====================================
In all week, except tomorrow, when I'll be in Pasadena with Steve Kean at a
meeting of Republican Congressional folks to discuss CA's electricity mess.
Joseph Alamo
02/20/2001 12:18 PM
To: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron
cc: Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT@ECT
Subject: *Second Request*: Schedules Request for Week of February 19th
Please see previous request. Your responses would be most appreciated!
Thanks,
Joseph
---------------------- Forwarded by Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron on 02/20/2001 10:16
AM ---------------------------
Joseph Alamo
02/15/2001 12:27 PM
To: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron,
Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT@ECT
Subject: Schedules Request for Week of February 19th
Please forward your *anticipated* schedules to me for next week, as soon as
possible.
[Just a reminder: Monday the 19th is a Company holiday.]
Thanks in advance for your assistance.
Joseph Alamo
Sr. Administrative Assistant
Government Affairs - The Americas
San Francisco CA
=====================================
|
1,515 |
Subject: Re:
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/4483.
=====================================
Our plan worked. By telling you two you better hurry cuz otherwise we'd go
ahead, you guys jumped first. Thanks. Now all the pressure's off.
Yes, we'll be there on Sunday.
I think the only person who doesn't know is Cameron....
Best,
Jeff
"Scott Laughlin" <[email protected]>
05/09/2001 02:52 PM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Re:
Thanks, dude, that's really nice. I have no idea what I'm doing at all--just
going with my heart. I struggled between telling people and not, but just
figured I had to tell some. Will you be there Sunday so that I can just
drink and play pool and ease into this? I hope so. And don't forget, you're
next son!
Hope post-school is treating you right.
LATE!
>From: [email protected]
>To: [email protected]
>Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 12:52:36 -0500
>
>Dude:
>If I don't see you, good luck this weekend, have fun, and congratulations.
>Very cool deal. And remember, be true.
>
>Best,
>Jeff
>
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
=====================================
|
1,516 |
Subject: Overview of CLCs and NDIECs
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/2382.
=====================================
Some documents that Bowen & Co. did on CLEC v. IXC that may still be
pertinent.
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 10/13/2000 01:38 PM -----
"Camille Estes" <[email protected]>
08/23/2000 03:19 PM
Please respond to camille
To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
cc: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>
Subject: Overview of CLCs and NDIECs
All,
Please find attached a memo providing an overview of the rights and
responsibilities of CLCs and NDIECs in California. Also attached are the
referenced California code sections and those Commission decisions for which
we have an electronic version. Let us know if you have any questions.
Please note that Jeff does not have access to his email, so he has asked
that one of you forward this message to Lara Leibman.
Thank you
Camille Estes
Blumenfeld & Cohen
- CA CLC NDIEC Memo final.doc
- D.95-07-054.doc
- D9512056.rtf
- D98-08-031 consumer protection.RTF
- Enron Code Sections.doc
=====================================
|
1,517 |
Subject: Re: Weekly Staff meeting?
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/11948.
=====================================
yep.
Joseph Alamo
07/10/2001 07:31 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: Weekly Staff meeting?
so -- 8:30 Thursday okay with both of you??
From: Jeff Dasovich on 07/10/2001 12:07 PM CDT
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Alan Comnes/ENRON@enronXgate, Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron@ENRON, Paul
Kaufman/Enron@EnronXGate
Subject: Re: Weekly Staff meeting?
That's true, but we're trying to find substantive reasons for having the
meeting....
Susan J Mara
07/10/2001 12:05 PM
To: Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Alan Comnes/ENRON@enronXgate, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: Weekly Staff meeting?
Paul specifically told us to have one
Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
Joseph Alamo
07/10/2001 09:41 AM
To: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron, Alan
Comnes/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:
Subject: Weekly Staff meeting?
Did you folks want to try to have a Staff meeting/call this week?
or would you rather let it go until Paul returns?
Pls advise,
Thanks,
Joseph
=====================================
|
1,518 |
Subject: RE: are you ok? I love you!
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/2335.
=====================================
Greetings. Well, it's about over for the company known as Enron. Ultimately I, and just about everyone else, am going to need to find a new job. But it should be viewed as an opportunity rather than something less positive. It's a shame that such a fun, interesting and bright group of people that had a very successful core franchise are now in such a messy situation due to a handful of folks who exercised (at a minimum) extremely poor judgment. But it is what it is. As for me, I'm dusting off my resume and getting ready to send it around. I've already had a few calls from "inquiring minds," so we'll we where things end up. Thanks so much for the thoughts. Definitely crazy times, but I'm not getting to worked up about it. And besides, Prentice has accepted PWC's offer, so I'm looking forward to housekeeping!
Best,
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Nancy Sellers [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 10:20 AM
To: 'Jeff Dasovich'
Subject: are you ok? I love you!
Nancy
(707) 251-4870 (phone)
(707) 265-5446 (fax)
"Plus je bois, mieux je chante"
=====================================
|
1,519 |
Subject: PG&E Comments, A.01-06-020 ("Open Season")
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/27999.
=====================================
Re: PG&E's Open Season --
<<PGE Open Season Application Comments.rtf>>
Attached are Pacific Gas and Electric Company's responses to Administrative
Law Judge Brown's questions posed in the "Administrative Law Judge's Ruling
Shortening Time for Protests or Responses and Replies to the Application
Filed by Pacific Gas and Electric Company," issued June 14, in A.01-06-020
("PG&E gas transportation open season").
These PG&E responses ("PG&E Comments") are provided to the e-mail list sent
out yesterday (June 19) to recipients, per Judge Brown's request to PG&E.
(Please note that a limited number of recipients subsequently notified PG&E
that they did not wish to remain on the e-mail list. Accordingly, PG&E has
modified the list and the instant e-mail list of recipients reflects those
modifications/deletions.)
PG&E will also provide the PG&E Comments by mail to the service list in
I.99-07-003.
If technical questions arise from this e-mail, please call my secretary, Amy
Yu, at 415-973-2769.
Thank you,
Dave Anderson, PG&E Law Department 415-973-6659
- PGE Open Season Application Comments.rtf
=====================================
|
1,520 |
Subject: RE: FW: 3/20 field update from Ian, Kevin, David H., James B.
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/10269.
=====================================
Yes, we'll be talking about ROI, too. I'll let Karen know. Figure that
she'll likely bring a couple of people. Mind if I ask Trish and John?
Cameron Sellers <[email protected]>
03/21/2001 12:57 PM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: FW: 3/20 field update from Ian, Kevin, David H., James B.
Sure. But, we are also talking about the ROI model. OK??
Make sure you tell Karen about academy awards. She left a message on the
machine. Also, tell David and Nina and anyone Karen wants to bring is fine.
Just let me know about how many people.
Cameron Sellers
Vice President, Business Development
PERFECT
1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210
Palo Alto, CA 94303
[email protected]
650.798.3366 (direct dial)
650.269.3366 (cell)
650.858.1095 (fax)
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 10:48 AM
To: Cameron Sellers
Subject: Re: FW: 3/20 field update from Ian, Kevin, David H., James
B.
Class on Thursday. Something that we can talk about in Mexico?
=====================================
|
1,521 |
Subject: Re: Competition PR Strategy Update
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/543.
=====================================
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 10/04/2000 09:39 AM -----
James D Steffes
10/05/2000 09:00 PM
To: Margaret Carson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Karen
Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeannie
Mandelker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Linnell/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sue Nord/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rob Bradley/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Alhamd
Alkhayat/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Competition PR Strategy Update
So that we continue to drive our activities with our Public Affairs strategy,
we have asked Alhamd to coordinate our material and project timeline. We are
also asking Jeanie Mandelker to take the lead in working through our
different material to put into one look and feel.
Please let Alhamd know of your activities so that we are able to better
coordinate any bottlenecks. Also, please forward to Alhamd and Jeanie all
prior work that has been done so that they are in the loop.
Attached the original gameplan.
Jim
=====================================
|
1,522 |
Subject: Air/Energy Conference: your presentation
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/2290.
=====================================
Jeff and Ralph:
?
In lieu of trying to set up another conference call, why don't the two of
you, Pat and I try to have a few words Sunday evening, prior to the
conference.
?
Ralph:? you have expressed preference to follow Jeff?? That makes sense to
me,? given the agenda.
Jeff, you willl probably be discussing the question on new, more efficient
energy generation;? my guess is that Ralph will be speaking more time on
renewable energy sources
?
The point of this session, really, is to follow on the education sessions of
8:00-10am,? with some creative ideas about what can be done NOW.? Your
session and the following one re: credits?will hopefully produce some
thoughts can that be returned to and discussed further in the context of the
subsequent?topics.? As Pat and I talk with other presenters and responders,
it is?seeming to me that?the best hope for solving the?problem in the short
range (next two summers) will be the kind of ideas that hopefully will?come
out of your session and the following one.
?
See you?next week, and thanks for agreeing to present.
?
Linda Wilson?
=====================================
|
1,523 |
Subject: Re: Hydro
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/2989.
=====================================
I agree we should have the work performed and we can talk about whether we
file it later.
Roger
Mona L Petrochko@ENRON
11/02/2000 04:20 PM
To: Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Roger Yang
cc: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@Enron, [email protected], Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron@ENRON, Marcie
Milner/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Paul Kaufman, Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mary
Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Comnes
Subject: Hydro
There is an opportunity to update our existing testimony in the hydro
proceeding based upon current market information. As PG&E is saying $2.8
billion reflects current market prices, I think we should consider filing
something that would indicate that the value of the assets is greater than
what we had previously submitted $3.4 billion.
We have to consider the FERC order and the likelihood that prices that were
experienced this summer is not likely to re-occur, to the same extent, next
summer.
I will submit an RCR, but want to make sure we discuss it first and give
MRW adequate time to do their analysis, should we decide to file.
Let me know your thoughts.
Thanks.
=====================================
|
1,524 |
Subject: Re: CEQA ruling
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/1279.
=====================================
Thank you very much for the info.
Anita Taff-Rice <[email protected]>
12/07/2000 07:11 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich <[email protected]>
cc: Steve Bowen <[email protected]>, Jeremy Meier
<[email protected]>
Subject: CEQA ruling
PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
ATTORNEY CLIENT COMMUNICATIONS
Jeff, we wanted to make sure you were aware that the CPUC approved an
alternate decision from Loretta Lynch today that limits the ability of
Edison (CLEC light) to use leased facilities from other providers as an
alternative to getting CEQA approval and building its own facilities.
Upon initial review, it doesn't appear that the ruling would preclude
the arrangement we discussed, in which Enron would purchase SERVICE
(which could be dark fiber) from a carrier with CEQA authority even
though provision of the service would require building new facilities.
I'd like to wait until I see the final version of the decision before
giving you a more definite interpretation, but I wanted to make sure you
were aware of this development until then. Please call if you have any
immediate questions.
=====================================
|
1,525 |
Subject: Last Chance to get RealMoney at Special Holiday Rate
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/8289.
=====================================
Dear Friend:
Time is running out! There are only a few more shopping days left
to get RealMoney.com at our special holiday discount prices. On
January 16, 2001, our special offer will expire. After that you
will be unable to take advantage of a full year of RealMoney.com
for $100 off our regular price.
Each gift of RealMoney.com is still just $99.95. But only if you act
now and click here:
http://offers.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/set.cgi?code=GGRE
You can give as many gifts as you like or even renew your own
subscription. But hurry. Time is running out.
Happy New Year.
Karen Smith Singer
Director - Customer Retention
RealMoney.com
P.S. This offer expires January 16, 2001.
If you would like to be excluded from receiving these types
of special offers in the future, please send an email to
[email protected] with the subject line "No Special Offers."
Please note: Users of Microsoft Internet Explorer, version 5.0
or higher, may experience problems during this purchase. If
you experience these problems please click 'Refresh' on your
browser, or call customer service at 1-800-562-9571.
=====================================
|
1,526 |
Subject: Re: Dinner Tonight
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/1434.
=====================================
Needs to know before your parents leave for Mexico, which is tomorrow,
unfortunately. I guess I'll be at my house. You want to stay there, or you
want to stay at your place? Either way's OK with me.
Prentice Sellers <[email protected]> on 09/14/2000 03:08:01 PM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Re: Dinner Tonight
OK, I understand. Are you going to be at your house tonight then?
When does Jeff need an answer about the stumps? Can we talk about it this
weekend?
At 02:55 PM 9/14/2000 -0500, you wrote:
>Honey, I really want to come, but my homework is due to my group tonite and
>I haven't even started it. I love you tons and hope you understand.
>
>Please call your mom. She was a pain on the phone today, saying there's no
>need to remove the stumps at the dome. Jeff's willing to do ALL THREE for
>$350. It's just ridiculous and I am having a hard time haggling anymore.
>
> I love you tons. And if you want to talk more about dinner, please call
>me. I'm sorry, but there's just too darned much to do. (I think my cold's
>getting worse, not better. :(
>
>
>xoxoxoxoxox
=====================================
|
1,527 |
Subject: Re: It's time for a BBQ!
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/4819.
=====================================
Haven't checked my calendar, but I plan to come. Been WAY too long.
Best,
Jeff
Kari Ontko <[email protected]>
06/03/2001 05:28 PM
Please respond to kontko
To: jeff dasovich <[email protected]>, laura newman
<[email protected]>, lori hom <[email protected]>, pat scatena
<[email protected]>, michael spear <[email protected]>, carl
hedleston <[email protected]>, madeleine todd <[email protected]>,
alice grubb <[email protected]>, nora mcgee <[email protected]>,
jeff walker <[email protected]>, luis pine <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: It's time for a BBQ!
Hello all, I am having a bbq on Saturday, June 23 at 5:00. It is byob
your own something to barbecue. It is the weekend of the Sonoma County
Fair so those who want to - we can go check out the fair after. Please
respond. Hope everyone will be around it will be great to see
everyone. kari
ps I galloped Oscar around the trails today and he was very happy. He
thinks he has died and gone to horse heaven! Everyone has to come and
visit him and we can gallop around the trails.
=====================================
|
1,528 |
Subject: DWR Option Expires
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/10476.
=====================================
FYI. DWR declines to extend option (which is amazing because our deal is one
of the few deals that would help CA - lower prices today).
Jim
----- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 03/29/2001 07:04 AM -----
Christopher F Calger@ECT
03/28/2001 06:39 PM
To: Tracy Ngo/PDX/ECT@ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Louise
Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT,
James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, William S Bradford/Enron@EnronXGate
cc:
Subject: DWR Option Expires
FYI - we proposed several alternatives to DWR that would effectively extend
our put swaption through the end of April for a cost to ENA of approximately
$5MM. None of those were acceptable to DWR. The option will therefore
expire at 5:00 PPT today. Vikram Budraja, Advisor to Gov Davis, suggested
that we are not dealing in good faith and suggested that he will speak with
Ken Lay (we have heard this several dozen times). In any event, I expect to
talk with DWR tomorrow to propose a short-term transaction. They might
accept it, reject it or prefer one of the term option proposals.
=====================================
|
1,529 |
Subject: RE: BF Good Case
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/4888.
=====================================
Dylan,
Write up looks good to me. I added a new exhibit 6 worksheet to your
spreadsheet. It's a simple graph of X vs a. You may want to add it to the
report as an illustration of the relationship. I'm at work and was having
trouble adding an arrow to indicate which direction was good to BF Goodrich.
Since your the IT manager I thought it would be no problem for you. Anyway,
nice job on the report!
Jimmy <<BF Good Exhibits.xls>>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dylan Windham [SMTP:[email protected]]
> Sent: March 17, 2001 5:33 PM
> To: [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: BF Good Case
>
>
>
> Ok gang,
>
> Here is the corrected version. I made the changes that Jimmy and Mark
> suggested and added the insurance information that we came up with on
> Monday. Please make any changes by 9:00 pm tomorrow and send them to me
> so
> that I can get it ready to turn in.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dylan << File: BFG Dylan 0317.doc >> << File: BF Good Exhibit 1.doc >>
> << File: BF Good Exhibits.xls >>
- BF Good Exhibits.xls
=====================================
|
1,530 |
Subject: FYI -- interesting article to read
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/5141.
=====================================
Good article on BW Trading and other aspects of Enron. Of particular note is
the mention that EBS is a CLEC in many states - the first time I have seen
this kind of mention. Cheers.
----- Forwarded by Scott Bolton/Enron Communications on 03/01/01 08:57 AM
-----
Tracy Cooper
02/28/01 03:24 PM
To: Scott Bolton/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
cc:
Subject: FYI -- interesting article to read
Tracy J. Cooper
Enron Broadband Services
Legal Department
(503) 886-0283
----- Forwarded by Tracy Cooper/Enron Communications on 02/28/01 03:24 PM
-----
[email protected]
02/28/01 02:53 PM
Please respond to bsmith
To: Tracy Cooper/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
cc:
Subject: Re: Hey Brian
http://www.telecomclick.com/newsarticle.asp?newsarticleid=133259
Tracy,
Here's that article I was talking about. It's a pretty good one. I'll get
you that other info you requested this weekend.
Regards,
Brian C. Smith
Day Wireless Systems
234 NW 14th
Portland, OR
97209-2603
tel. 503-228-9292
fax. 503-228-2439
cell. 503-209-5359
www.daywireless.com
=====================================
|
1,531 |
Subject: Re: Case, #3,4
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/561.
=====================================
Jimmie's the "compiler" this time. You're stuff was good. Whether he has
time to incorporate remains to be seen. But I wouldn't sweat it. We can
talk more tonite about our somewhat "loose" but thus far effective means for
getting these things done every week.
Best,
Jeff
Christine Piesco <[email protected]>
10/09/2000 12:45 PM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Re: Case, #3,4
Jeff,
I emailed my answers to 3 and 4 as soon as I got home last night - did
you get them and did they look OK for inclusion? I read over some of the
other members answers to the same questions and it looked like we
addressed slightly different areas on #3, so we should be able to merge
them together. On #4 I think I had a slightly different answer, I'm not
sure which is right.
Christine
[email protected] wrote:
> Looks good. Thanks. See you tomorrow.
>
> Best,
> Jeff
--
Christine Piesco
Industrials Account Manager
Oracle Corporation
500 Oracle Parkway
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Phone: (650) 506-3640
Fax: (650) 633-3753
[email protected]
- christine.piesco.vcf
=====================================
|
1,532 |
Subject: Re: Background for Skilling for Call w/Bryson
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT', 'Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT', 'Don', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/11312.
=====================================
Jeff --
Attached is my redlined version of your comments.
Use as appropriate.
Jim
From: Jeff Dasovich on 04/19/2001 05:34 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Don
Black/HOU/EES@EES, Hap Boyd/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@ENRON,
James W Lewis/HOU/EES@EES, Linda J Noske/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
Tribolet/ENRON@enronXgate, Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@ENRON, Robert C Williams/Enron@EnronXGate, Steve
Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@ENRON, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, William
S Bradford/Enron@EnronXGate
Subject: Background for Skilling for Call w/Bryson
Folks:
My apologies. This is not proofed, but I wanted to make sure that everyone
had a chance to review and comment. Apologies for any unintentional
omissions and errors. I think it tracks closely with the direction agreed to
on the call today. All comments are encouraged and welcome.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
1,533 |
Subject: RE: Conference Call with PG&E to Discuss the Gas Portion of Its
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/928.
=====================================
Jeff,
Thanks for the invite. Yes, we would like to participate in the conf. call. The only definite conflict I have is on Dec. 3 & 4 as I will be traveling to SF for SoCal's BCAP PHC. Let me know the scheduled time etc, as I will probably have some of our regulatory people also sit in on the conference. Thanks again.
Glen
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 4:55 PM
To: Tycholiz, Barry; Tribolet, Michael; Mellencamp, Lisa; Hass, Glen; Miller, Stephanie; Tholt, Jane M.; Lawner, Leslie; Cantrell, Rebecca W.; Steffes, James D.; Novosel, Sarah; Harris, Steven; Fossum, Drew
Subject: Conference Call with PG&E to Discuss the Gas Portion of Its Proposed Plan of Reorganization that It Will File w/FERC Toward End of November
PG&E called. They want to set up a conference call to brief us on the gas piece of their POR that they'll be filing with FERC around November 30th. They want to try to do it in the next couple of weeks. Please let me know if you're interested and please pass this along to anyone else who might be interested. Thanks.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
1,534 |
Subject: Agenda and current proposal
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/1108.
=====================================
All,
Here is an updated program with a laundry list of speakers. This afternoon at
5:30/2:30 we need to:
1) Make introductions
2) Agree on general format
3) Agree on date. Bill prefers October so we need to resolve that.
4) Agree on initial list of speakers.
5) Determine contacts most likely to get the speakers to accept, and assign
calling list.
For selecting speakers, Lee and I have discussed a cascading selection method
(in the spirit of cascading electricity ancillary service auctions I suppose)
by
which we try to get a commitment from our top choice then select our second
choice to ensure balance with the first, and each step of the way try to
ensure
the next selection provides balance to the existing slate. Since we'll all be
on the phone together our first step should still be to establish a top list
and
assign responsibility for calling a few people.
Talk to you soon! Bill can you set up the call and send around the call-in
number? Thanks.
Rob <<Draft program 090500.doc>>
Rob Gramlich
PJM Market Monitoring Unit
(610) 666-4291
[email protected]
- Draft program 090500.doc
=====================================
|
1,535 |
Subject: Welcome back!
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/3882.
=====================================
Hope everyone had a wonderful Thanksgiving holiday and welcome back!
?
Well...after a brief series of technical issues, we have the Haas Student
Supply store back up and running with a variety of commonly needed items.?
Just to give you an idea of some of the goods you can purchase at Haas,
here's a short list...
?
AA & AAA batteries
Single 100MB ZIP disks
CD-RW's?(for all you music lovers...)
Sanford Rollerball pens (black & blue)
Kodak film
Penguin Caffeinated Peppermints
Disposable cameras
Epson and HewlettPackard Inkjet cartridges.
...and more!!!
We've also added n inkjet?cartridge selector, so if you know your printer
model, the machine knows which cartridge fits the printer you've
selected!!!??Our prices are competitive with the bookstore, and your can
easily pay with most major credit/debit cards!!!
?
We want to thank you for your patience and let you know that we're ready to
serve your needs again.? If you have any questions or suggestions, please
don't hesitate to write us!? Send any feedback to:
?
[email protected]
?
Thanks again,
?
Zoom Systems
=====================================
|
1,536 |
Subject: Re: Absence from Class Due to Business Travel
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/mba__quant/28.
=====================================
Jeff Dasovich,
I am letting the students form their own teams for the team projects.
They should be in groups of four, with variations in the number
needing advanced approval by me. You can arrange for someone
to turn in Personal Problem Set #1 (due next week) for you, or turn
in both #1 and #2 on April 6 (when #2 is due). You can also arrange
to have a video made of the lectures, and I leave my past handouts
outside my office door (F526) at the Haas School in case you need
them.
--Tom McCullough
At 08:44 AM 3/23/00 -0600, you wrote:
>Greetings Professor McCullough:
>
>Unfortuanately, I am travelling and had to miss last nite's session. I will
>also miss next week's session due to business travel. I do not anticipate
>having
>to miss any others, however. With respect to the teams, are they assigned,
or
>will we be forming groups ourselves?
>
>Best,
>Jeff
>
=======================================================================
Tom McCullough
Senior Lecturer
Haas School of Business
University of California at Berkeley
==========================================================================
=====================================
|
1,537 |
Subject: California Rate Assessment
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/5055.
=====================================
Bill and Roger,
Thanks for the quick turn-around on the analysis. I hope the weekend was not
totally ruined. After review of the study, we thought it would be useful to
further expand the scenarios into a Worst, Base and Best Case. The scenarios
we would like you to run are outlined in the attached file. Each scenario
would reflect a wet, dry and normal weather case.
Please note that each scenario has a different date for surcharge
implementation. The Best Case reflects the date included in your original
analysis. Along those lines, would you please expand on the rationale for
assuming the 1/01/02 implementation date.
In addition to reflecting the rate impact on a cents per kwh basis, please
include a percent impact as well.
Like our original request, we are on a fast-track. We would like to schedule
a conference call for 2:30 p.m. central time Wednesday (March 7) to discuss
the results of your analysis. Hopefully, the data you have already generated
can be quickly "massaged" to accomodate the scenarios requested.
Please call me at 713 853 3170 if you have any questions.
Robert
=====================================
|
1,538 |
Subject: Re: FW: MPAR Team Assignment Change
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/3246.
=====================================
We can meet at my meager apartment if you like. Around 7?
Jacqueline Kelly <[email protected]>
11/08/2000 01:54 PM
To: "Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: FW: MPAR Team Assignment Change
How lame is this e-mail...
(Did you complain about being on my team??)
Where are we meeting tonight? I think I may have your case study...I have
someone's.
See you tonight,
Jackie
-----Original Message-----
From: Meg St. John [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2000 11:32 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: MPAR Team Assignment Change
Jackie,
We have changed your team assignment for the Mid Program Academic
Retreat. You were assigned to Atlantic 5, but that team had more members
than any other and we needed to reshuffle to achieve some parity.
You are now assigned to Atlantic 4.
This means that your Pre-Meeting will occur on Tuesday, and not Wednesday.
Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions or concerns that
you may have.
Thank you,
Meg St. John
Assistant Director, Evening MBA Program
(510) 527-1406
=====================================
|
1,539 |
Subject: upcoming associatin meetings
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/28466.
=====================================
Forwarded at the request of Sue Landwehr:
Gang---per Linda's request on our call this afternoon, here is a list of
some of the upcoming annual/summer meetings where members of Congress or
members of the Administration may be speaking or will be attending.
Please call me directly if you have any questions or thoughts beyond our
normal Monday afternoon discussions.
NARUC----July 14 thru 17 in Seattle. Steve Kean is speaking at one
session. This event will get lots of media.
RGA--July 15 thru 16 in Macinac Island, Michigan. Ten to twelve governors
attending. Landwehr will be covering.
ALEC----August 2-5? in New York City. Janel Guerrero and Barbara Hueter
will be primary coverage, with Jean Ryall (Enron state gov affairs for
Texas) also attending.
NGA (National Governors Association)----August 4 thru 7 in Providence Rhode
Island. Landwehr will be covering. No energy sessions currently on the
agenda.
WGA---August 12 thru 14 in Coeur D'Alene, Idaho. Landwehr has primary
coverage, with Kaufman backing up. There will be signficant attention on
energy issues in sessions and resolutions.
=====================================
|
1,540 |
Subject: Job # 6633 Pri: 3 (Subject: IZIO problem)
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/558.
=====================================
Your request for service has been recorded with the above Job tracking
number. It has been assigned to William Starks who will contact you within
one working day (Contact from the Web group will be within two working days).
If you have questions about your job
please contact mailto:[email protected] or the helpdesk with your
tracking number.
Click the URL below to view updated status info and history for this job:
https://ssl.haas.berkeley.edu/helpdesk/hrs/index.pl?bodysrc=secure/hdjobupdate
.pl?ticketid=6633
To request service and check progress on service requests go to
http://helpdesk.haas.berkeley.edu
Thank you for contacting the Haas Computing Services Helpdesk
-------------------------------------------------------------
Your initial request:
Greetings. My password was working great.
Everything was working great. But
now the password I received no longer works, and
when I submitted a request for
a "new password" from IZIO, I didn't receive
anything. I very much need to get
into the course websites as soon as possible.
Thanks for your help.
Jeff Dasovich
2nd year EMBA student
=====================================
|
1,541 |
Subject: RE: WPTF and Douglass
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/1083.
=====================================
That's fine. If we live to make it into '02, I may try to get Netco into WPTF and I would like to be the contact but we can talk about it more then.
Alan
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 12:27 PM
To: Comnes, Alan; Kaufman, Paul
Subject: RE: WPTF and Douglass
Importance: High
I've notified Gary that my name should replace Sue's and our involvement with WPTF only goes through the end of the year. I'll forward to you anything that he sends to me. That make sense?
Dan's summaries only go through the end of the year. Same there, I've been contact with Dan. Let me know if this answers the questions and works.
Best,
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Comnes, Alan
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 12:26 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff; Kaufman, Paul
Subject: WPTF and Douglass
Jeff or Paul:
Do either of you know how far out our WPTF membership goes? Can I tell Gary that I am Enron's WPTF contact?
Also, I see Dan Douglass is still doing advice letter summaries. Jeff, are you Dan's liason on this? Does he have a budget at this point?
Cheers,
Alan
=====================================
|
1,542 |
Subject: CA Gas-related
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/424.
=====================================
PG&E Gas Accord--$10K
PUC proceeding to consider continuing PG&E's "Gas Accord." The Gas Accord is PG&E's program to unbundle its backbone transmission and storage systems. The program began in 1998 and will expire Q4/2002.
Sempra (SoCalGas) System Unbundling--$10K
Though PG&E's system has been unbundled since 1998, SoCalGas' system remains bundled. The PUC has pressured SoCalGas to emulate PG&E's restructured system.
ENA Origination Support (Getting info from Tycholiz)--$$XXK
Rate related proceedings (PG&E/Sempra)--$1.5K
Every two years, the utilities are required to file with the PUC any price changes it desires to make. These price changes can have a direct financial effect on ENA's, TW's and EES' business.
ENA power plant support--$2.5K
ENA Western Origination is developing numerous gas-fired power plants in California. ENA seeks GA support in order to obtain gas services for those plants.
Transwestern infrastructure and origination support--$2.5K
Transwestern is either considering, or in the early stages of, developing additional pipeline infrastrastructure in California.
CFEE Board Dues--$15K
=====================================
|
1,543 |
Subject: WPTF Board Meeting January 8
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/1108.
=====================================
Board package will go out to you Monday evening, January 7. Call in
number can be found below. Driving instructions to Mirant from Oakland
Airport forthcoming. Feed me additional agenda items.
HNY
gba
AGENDA
WPTF Board Meeting
Tuesday, January 8, 2002
Walnut Creek, CA
9:30 a.m. (PST) Call to Order
? Additional Agenda Items
? Approval of November Minutes (pgs 3 - 4)
? WPTF Involvement in Enron OII - Dan (pg 5)
? Other PUC Matters - Dan
? Letter to FERC Supporting PG&E POR - Gary (pg 6)
? ISO Market Redesign 2002 - Gary (pgs 7 -
LUNCH
?
? PR and Media - Gary (pg 18 and 18A)
? WPTF General Meeting and Riordan Dinner Sponsors - Gary
? Financial Report
1:30 p.m. (PST) Adjourn
Next Meeting
Tuesday, February 12, 2002
El Paso Merchant
Denver, CO
AUDIO ACCESS INFORMATION:
==========================
PRODUCT TYPE: UNATTENDED
CALL TYPE: MEET ME
# OF LINES: Total=4 Dialout=0 Meet Me=0 Meet Me Toll=4
Entry Method: Tone In
CALL DATE: JAN-08-2002 (Tuesday)
CALL TIME: 09:30 AM PACIFIC TIME
DURATION: 4 hr
USA Toll Number: +1-712-271-0887
PASSCODE: 32463
=====================================
|
1,544 |
Subject: RE: Meeting w/Marcie Edwards, Anaheim General Manager
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/2311.
=====================================
Can you forward me both? I'll take a look at them. Maybe they'll do the trick. Also, do you have that press article where we partnered with a muni (in Canada, I think)?
-----Original Message-----
From: Scheuer, Janelle
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 4:49 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: RE: Meeting w/Marcie Edwards, Anaheim General Manager
Hi Jeff...I have an intro letter, and the presentation that we typically give on our first visit. Do you think one of those might be appropriate, or shall I put together something in between the two?
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 3:51 PM
To: Scheuer, Janelle
Subject: Meeting w/Marcie Edwards, Anaheim General Manager
Greetings:
I just talked to Marcie. She's interested, but wants some more info to examine before setting up a meeting. Aren't there some press articles about the sort of muni partnerships you want to pursue with SMUD and Anaheim? Do we have anything else that I can email to her to wet her whistle for the meeting? Will get back to you very soon about meeting with Schori at SMUD.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
1,545 |
Subject: Re: Coffee w/Rebecca
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/2156.
=====================================
I'm slow, but I catch on eventually. Steffes was fired up when he called.
Sounds like the meeting went pretty well. Have a good weekend.
Best,
Jeff
Richard Shapiro
10/06/2000 10:25 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: [email protected], rshapiro@enron, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
[email protected], James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Coffee w/Rebecca
Jeff is a very smart guy!
From: Jeff Dasovich on 10/06/2000 04:02 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: [email protected], rshapiro@enron, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
[email protected], James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Coffee w/Rebecca
Rebecca Smith called. She wants to have coffee on Monday at 10 AM
California. Topics: 1) How California got here. 2) How California can get
out of it.
Any chance of talking Monday AM prior to 10 AM California time? I think I've
got the messages pretty well down, but might be useful to touch base. Let me
know.
Hear's a message I'm practicing:
"Shapiro and Steffes went to FERC on Friday----problem solved."
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
1,546 |
Subject: Energy Systems Update
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/12206.
=====================================
Energy Systems Update for Wednesday, May 9 at 8:00am:
The California Independent System Operator has declared a "WARNING" which
will extend though the hour 2359 due to forecasted high loads and
temperatures throughout the control area.
Consumers are requested to voluntarily curtail nonessential electric load to
avoid more severe conditions including involuntary curtailments.
ISO may be required to call a Stage 2 including nonfirm by mid-morning. The
ISO indicated a Stage 3 emergency and firm load shedding is possible today.
If outages occur they will begin with Block 1.
Communications are expected to be similiar to yesterday. Any further
specific changes in operating conditions will be communicated with
additional Grid Updates.
Please note updated web link below.
http://www.pge.com/customer_services/business/nonfirm/index.html
For up-to-date information regarding the current status of the California
Energy Crisis, please log into Pacific Gas and Electric Company's Web Site
at: http://www.pge.com/customer_services/business/nonfirm/index.html or the
CAISO Web Site at: <<<<http://www.caiso.com/>>>>
=====================================
|
1,547 |
Subject: Pizza Dinners
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/857.
=====================================
Hi Everyone,
As you know, every semester we host a series of pizza dinners for each
class in the Evening & Weekend MBA Program. The purpose of the dinners is
to provide the students with a smaller forum from which to ask questions
and express concerns about the program.
The schedule for this semester's pizza dinners is listed below:
Monday, October 22 C125
Tuesday, October 23 Bank of America Forum
Wednesday, October 24 Bank of America Forum
Thursday, October 25 C220
All pizza dinners are held during the break from 7:30 - 8:15pm.
The agenda items we have for this round of pizza dinners are:
(1) Meet the new Director of the Evening & Weekend MBA Program
(2) Discussions of new MBA options at Haas
(3) Electives
If you have any items that you would like added to agenda, please let us
know by responding to this email.
We hope you will be able to join us for pizza and soda,
The Evening & Weekend MBA Program Staff
Jane Thompson
Director, Evening and Weekend MBA Program
Haas School of Business
University of California, Berkeley
460 Student Services Bldg.
Berkeley, CA 94720-1906
510/643-0434
=====================================
|
1,548 |
Subject: eProcurement Is Coming!
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/27769.
=====================================
eProcurement
I am pleased to announce that iBuyit eProcurement is coming to Corporate on
July 2, and you have been identified as a future user.
The purpose of this e-mail is to announce the Corporate implementation of
iBuyit eProcurement and to encourage you to prepare yourself to use this new
tool.
From pens to computers, eProcurement will enable you to order and approve
purchases online. Special features include:
* eCatalog (Corporate Express and more!) to help you shop for the items that
you need
* Easy repeat purchases
* Automatic routing of shopping carts for approval
Over the coming weeks, the iBuyit team will provide you with the following
information to help you transition to the new system:
* How iBuyit eProcurement will impact your purchase activities
* Training information
* Where to get help
I encourage you to review this information carefully and to take advantage of
the training opportunities.
If you have any questions about the Corporate implementation of iBuyit
eProcurement please contact the iBuyit project team by sending an e-mail to <
<mailto:[email protected]>>.
=====================================
|
1,549 |
Subject: Re: Senator Joe Dunn's Conference Call
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/11574.
=====================================
Folks,
Please advise your availability ASAP in reference to the request noted below
to have
a conference call re: Sen. Joe Dunn w/Rick, Jim & Richard Sanders (legal).
Thanks,
Joseph
---------------------- Forwarded by Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron on 04/25/2001 12:50
PM ---------------------------
Linda J Noske@ECT
04/25/2001 12:41 PM
To: Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: Senator Joe Dunn's Conference Call
Yes, Jim realized that, but figured they could participate from home if
necessary. Advise.
Joseph Alamo @ ENRON
25/04/2001 02:40 PM
To: Linda J Noske/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Senator Joe Dunn's Conference Call
Do you realize that's 7 am Pacific time? Can you move it back a little later?
Let me know,
Thanks
Linda J Noske@ECT
04/25/2001 12:25 PM
To: Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Senator Joe Dunn's Conference Call
Jim just phoned me.............we need to schedule this in the a.m. now, FERC
meeting moved again today.................
I need to set up tomorrow morning, 9:00 EST, 8:00 a.m. CDT, what is their
availability? Advise.
Thanks for your help.
=====================================
|
1,550 |
Subject: Status Report
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/529.
=====================================
Please respond to SBX2 78 (Polanco), the MOU opposed by SCE, failed passage in the Senate
Energy Committee. The bill will be voted on again in committee tomorrow
morning at 9:00 a.m. If the bill succeeds, it will immediately go to
Appropriations and then the Senate floor.
ABX2 82 (Keeley/Hertzberg), the MOU supported by the Administration, passed
out of the Assembly Energy Committee and the Assembly Appropriations
Committee, largely on a party-line vote. The first time the bill was voted
on by the Energy Committee it failed passage. On reconsideration Rod Wright
and Dead Florez switched their votes and the bill passed. The bill will be
heard on the Assembly floor tomorrow at 9:30 a.m.
ABX2 50 (Wright, Campbell, etc.), the MOU minus transmission, passed out of
the Assembly Energy Committee, largely on a party-line vote. The bill will
be heard by the Appropriations Committee tomorrow upon call of the chair.
SBX2 18 (Burton), DRC, will be heard by the Senate Energy Committee tomorrow
at 9:00 a.m. It is my understanding that the Republicans may be supportive
of this measure which requires a 2/3 vote.
=====================================
|
1,551 |
Subject: FW: Wednesday's Filing
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/2312.
=====================================
This time with attachment...
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 6:18 PM
To: 'Dan Douglass'
Subject: RE: Wednesday's Filing
Dan: Looks good. Sue calls me a party-pooper, but I've hi-lighted areas (in bold italics) that I think would benefit from some smoothing of the edges. Not that I don't very much enjoy reading it. I do. I'm just concerned that it will unnecessarily create additional hostility in what is already--as you know--an incredibly hostile environment. Thanks again.
Best,
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Douglass [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 2:38 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: Wednesday's Filing
Jeff, I never received your input for the filing due Wedensday regarding the utilities' joint filing on DA suspension. Could you please give me a call or email whatever you have? Thanks!
Dan
Law Offices of Daniel W. Douglass
5959 Topanga Canyon Blvd. Suite 244
Woodland Hills, CA 91367
Tel: (818) 596-2201
Fax: (818) 346-6502
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
=====================================
|
1,552 |
Subject: Group Think - take aways
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/354.
=====================================
Hello, find attached:
1. wine case.xls for those in Udpa's accounting class - cost data and Q1/Q2
2. EMI case.xls for the marketing case - it has marketing data summarized
See you in class!
At 10:56 AM 2/11/00 -0600, [email protected] wrote:
>Ok, looks like the Orbit Room can't handle the size of our group so there's
>been a proposed change of venue for Saturday's meeting. If anyone has
>alternative suggestions, feel free to propose.
>
> Accounting discussion 10AM-11AM (for Tues/Thurs folks)
> Marketing discussion 11AM-Noon (for all)
>
> Meet at my office.
>
>101 California Street (one block from the cable car turnaround)
>Suite 1950
>
>Enter at the California Street entrance
>Buzz at the door; guard will let you in
>Guard will know to enable elevator to get you to the 19th floor
>I'll keep the door to the office ajar so that folks can enter easily once
>on 19th floor
>
>Sound reasonable? Did I miss anything.
- Wine case.xls
- EMI case.xls
Kimberly Kupiecki
Senior Account Executive
A&R Partners
[email protected]
(650) 762 2800 main
(650) 762 2825 direct
fax (650) 762 2801
=====================================
|
1,553 |
Subject: California's (DWR's) Gas Needs and Conflict of Interest
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/417.
=====================================
Hi Barry:
Congratulations on side-stepping what many (including us) thought would be a summer filled with supply disruptions. We're as glad as anybody that it hasn't happened.
I have a quick question: Your consultant for gas procurement, a fellow named Mark Baldwin, until recently did some consulting work for one of our business units, Transwestern gas pipeline. Mark has informed us that we won't be able to talk to him in his new role due to conflict of interest considerations that arise from our previous relationship with Mark.
With that in mind, I was wondering if there is someone else working on gas procurement other than Mark (who doesn't face the same conflict issues) that we could meet with to discuss providing low-cost gas services to California? We're very cognizant of the importance of maintaining a conflict-free environment. But it would be a shame for the state to forego a good gas deal for the state's consumers. If there's someone we can talk to and avoid (even the appearance of) conflict-of-interest, we'd be very anxious to do so.
Thanks for your time and hope all is well.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
1,554 |
Subject: Re: SBX 9 (Elimination of Standby Charges)
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/10101.
=====================================
FYI.
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/19/2001 10:28 AM -----
Alan Comnes@ECT
03/16/2001 05:23 PM
To: Jeff Shields/PDX/ECT, [email protected], [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Re: SBX 9 (Elimination of Standby Charges)
Jeff S: Thanks,
Jeff D., Sandi M.: FYI
Alan C.
Jeff Shields
03/16/2001 12:10 PM
To: Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: SBX 9 (Elimination of Standby Charges)
Enron has some vested interest in this legislation. We own interest in
FuelCell Energy, Inc. and in a new micro-turbine company (SoloEnergy). At 5
MW there is not a lot of opportunity for Origination. On the other hand, at 5
MW it should be easy to permit this stuff and get units on-line in a matter
of a few weeks.
This legislation limits the technology by setting very low emissions
thresholds. Many of the existing micro-turbines are not this clean. This
legislation also assumes that the DG is at end-used sites. In my experience,
my small distribution utilities will benefit by installing DG at their
substations and at other sites throughout their service areas.
Jeff
=====================================
|
1,555 |
Subject: Today's IEP FERC Filing
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/3834.
=====================================
The IEP comments are attached in PDF and MS Word formats.? These were filed
today at FERC.? I've fired this email out to the list used to circulate?the
earlier draft as well as the list used to distribute? the Board agenda.? ABB
Andrew B. Brown
Ellison, Schneider & Harris, LLP
2015 H Street
Sacramento, CA? 95814
Phone: (916) 447-2166
Fax: (916) 447-3512
mailto:[email protected]
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:? This communication and any accompanying document(s)
are confidential and privileged.? They are intended for the sole use of the
addressee.? If you receive this transmission in error, you are advised that
any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in
reliance upon the communication is strictly prohibited.? Moreover, any such
inadvertent disclosure shall not compromise or waive the attorney-client
privilege as to this communication or otherwise.? If you have received this
communication in error, please contact the sender at the internet address
indicated or by telephone at (916)447-2166. Thank you.
- IEP_Cmts_EL00-95_001122.doc
- IEP_Cmts_EL00-95_001122.PDF
=====================================
|
1,556 |
Subject: Re: Talking points on gas in CA
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/12997.
=====================================
A few comments. Also, I reorganized the format extensively for what I
thought was a better flow. I didn't mark the changes, because it got too
confusing.
You can incorporate Christi's revisions with mine. I was just about through
when I got her message, so I didn't try to start over. Please call me at
X.35840 if you have any questions.
Jennifer Thome@ENRON
05/23/2001 08:13 AM
To: Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Ban
Sharma/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ray Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON, Nancy
Bagot/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Talking points on gas in CA
Becky and Christi:
Attached are revised talking points on natural gas in CA. I have made
revisions to reflect our discussion yesterday (e.g., no price caps, basis
differential is not explained by transportation costs, etc.).
As discussed, I hope to get input from the gas fundamentals group tomorrow
and finalize this document by Friday.
I welcome your feedback.
Jennifer
5-3550
=====================================
|
1,557 |
Subject: Re: Fellow referred to me by Ken Lay
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/3601.
=====================================
Thank you.
Steven J Kean
03/12/2001 04:46 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Vanessa Groscrand/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rosalee Fleming/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: Fellow referred to me by Ken Lay
It was not mentioned to me. I'm copying rosie and vanessa to find out if
this was a simple referral (in which case you should keep the work to a
minimum -- return the call, but don't get distracted from your other efforts)
or whether Ken is especially interested in this and wants us to follow
through.
Jeff Dasovich
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
03/12/2001 03:54 PM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Fellow referred to me by Ken Lay
Just got a call from a fellow named Jame Edgerly at the Enterprise Zone,
Inc. He told me that Ken Lay (through Ken's secretary Vanessa) referred me
to him. He is very interested in getting us to help him work with the
Legislature to establish an "Enterprise Zone" energy tariff to encourage
investment in California's Enterprice Zones. Before I launch on the effort,
just wanted to check in and see if this rings a bell with you. Thanks.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
1,558 |
Subject: RE: Turbine Export Issue
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/12481.
=====================================
richard greenberg @ opic left me a message to confirm his availability for a
call tomorrow. they are:
1-2 pm (EST) or 4:30 - 5 pm (EST) which tentatively works for us here in
houston. scott please confirm with richard @ GE to get him on the line as
well.
jmg
-----Original Message-----
From: Reblitz, Scott
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 5:49 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich@EES
Cc: Galan, Joseph M.; Dutt, Ranabir
Subject: Turbine Export Issue
Jeff: We are going to have a call with OPIC tomorrow to discuss the turbine
export issue and the state of affairs in the California re power. The two
times that OPIC people are available are 11:30-2:00 and 4:30-5:30 (both times
are eastern standard time). Does one of these slots appear better for you?
I don't anticipate that you would be needed for the entire time allotted for
the call but I'm sure the OPIC people will have some questions requiring your
knowledge of California. Attached, please find a summary document we're
working on containing talking points we want to convey to OPIC. Again,
thanks for your help, Scott
<< File: EletroboltExImSherman.doc >>
=====================================
|
1,559 |
Subject: Fwd: Re: Set Up LLC for CLEC Activity
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/8186.
=====================================
----- Forwarded by Sue Nord/NA/Enron on 01/05/2001 12:20 PM -----
"Daniel Clearfield" <[email protected]>
01/05/2001 10:32 AM
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Fwd: Re: Set Up LLC for CLEC Activity
Here's the answer to your question of earlier in the week. Best regards.
Daniel Clearfield, Esq.
Wolf, Block, Schorr and Solis-Cohen LLP
212 Locust St., Suite 200
Harrisburg, PA 17101
(717) 237-7173
(717) 237-7161 fax
----- Message from on -----
In response to the question by Enron, the state PUC will accept partnership
tax return information for a LLC. The state PUC follows whatever the
Department of Revenue requires to be utilized. Accordingly, where an LLC is
treated for federal income tax purposes as a partnership are tax classified
as a partnership for Pennsylvania purposes under the normal Personal Income
Tax provisions but are still treated as a corporation for Capital
Stock/Franchise Tax purposes. The LLC partnership would therefore be able to
file a PA-65 form which is based on the Federal 1065 partnership return with
the Department of Revenue and the PUC.
DAN
=====================================
|
1,560 |
Subject: Re: CPUC inquiry re gas customer turnbacks
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/3428.
=====================================
Thanks, Roger. We'll need to determine whether we've turned the customer
back. Any help that you and Catherine can give in that regard is
appreciated. Then we can decide if, and how, we choose to respond to the PUC
staffer. Thanks very much for your help.
Best,
Jeff
Roger O Ponce@EES
02/27/2001 07:27 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/Na/Enron@ENRON
cc: Catherine Woods/DUB/EES@EES, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
[email protected]@ENRON, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT@ENRON, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Peggy Mahoney/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Re: CPUC inquiry re gas customer turnbacks
On or about Oct .17th I returned a call to Kathy Pantolo (sp) at
818-846-8141 X 506 (according to my phone log). As I recall the reason for
her
calling the office was that the Sept. invoice had just arrived and she
questioned NGI price. The scope of our conversation was limited to gas
prices and how high they were, this is the only conversation I can recall
having with Providence Hospital ...
I hope this sheds a little more light on this issue.
Roger
=====================================
|
1,561 |
Subject: Project Raven
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/13271.
=====================================
----- Forwarded by Sue Nord/NA/Enron on 05/31/2001 04:08 PM -----
Brad Richter@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
05/31/2001 03:55 PM
To:
cc: (bcc: Sue Nord/NA/Enron)
Subject: Project Raven
To the due diligence teams of Project Raven--
As you may have already heard, EBS decided this week not to pursue continued
discussions with Raven. I wanted to take the time to thank each of you for
the many hours you put into the transaction. I firmly believe that we did
the most thorough due diligence possible given our time constraints and the
relative disarray of Raven's organization. Each diligence team pitched in
with helpful suggestions and worked toward a common goal, and we should be
proud of the manner in which we arrived at our conclusions. But as is the
rule in business, you win some and you lose some. Regardless of the outcome,
I sincerely appreciate your efforts and hope that we can meet up again on the
next deal. In the meantime, if you have any questions about the process or
would like to tie up loose ends please fell free to stop by.
Thanks again,
Brad Richter
EBS Corporate Development
=====================================
|
1,562 |
Subject: PG&E REBUTTAL POSITION
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/568.
=====================================
Jeff&Susan,
I just got off the phone with Rich Hall, Mr. PG&E, . It was all good news.
First, PG&E does not plan to file any rebuttal testimony. Secondly, Rich
indicated that their prep for the witness stand is to AVOID bringing Hector
Rd. into their position. Wheeler Ridge will be characterized as a unique
situation that requires further consideration. He acknowledged and
appreciated the work the Transwestern team has been putting forth trying to
at least give PG&E's requested settlement modification a fair and thoughtful
chance. Specifically, he understood and appreciated the "educational" effort
we have been expending with the Indicated Shippers. As to whom might file
rebuttal testimony to PG&E, like we assessed earlier, it is probably going
to be Kern. There is still an element in the PG&E camp that is advocating a
tougher position, but Rich is still successfully pulling them to our
preferred approach.
We will of course reassess the landscape after all the rebuttal testimony
has been filed, but so far the " seas are calm". I look forward to your
visit next week. You guys have a great weekend.
Mark, IGS
=====================================
|
1,563 |
Subject: Jessie Knight an Aggregator?
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/193.
=====================================
Please keep the following confidential.
Jessie Knight called. Here's the latest.
Seems the Chamber of Commerce is going to launch a campaign with the
following messages: 1) Deregulation must go forward, not back. 2) The
transition will continue to be a bit bumpy. 3) The best option businesses
and families have is to switch to an alternative service provider.
The Chamber has cut deals with ESPs (I didn't get all the details, but sounds
like an exclusive) according to which the Chamber will aggregate customers
and deliver them to the ESPs. I believe that The New Power Company will be
one of those ESPs.
Ray McNally's sister, who is one of our very satisfied rez customers in S.D.,
will appear at the press conference with the Chamber to announce the
program. They are attempting to launch the program and have the press
conference this week.
The Chamber is also launching a program to educate S.D. politicians and
business leaders on the benefits of retail choice and how to benefit from it.
The Chamber is still looking for a business customer to appear with them at
the press conference.
=====================================
|
1,564 |
Subject: Re: REVISED Merged Leg Document
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/28473.
=====================================
Delaney,
Note that I haven't passed these by Annie, but I believe she'd agree with
the suggestions.
Gary
1. I don't find any reference to this new definition being used in the
language. If that is the intent, then I believe that we need to strike
this definition .
"New Large Customer" is a Large Customer which either has not taken
electric service from an electrical corporation in California prior to
the effective date of this bill, or has been taking Direct Access
service continuously since April 30, 2000.
2. At the start of Section 2, I believe the 2003 should be 2002.
(1) On or before July 1, 2003, the CPUC shall approve electrical
corporation tariffs describing Core Service, Term Service and Spot
Market Service to be available to customers beginning at the Transition
Date.
3. Not my issue, but I recall that it was agreed to keep the following one
thing from Jeff's efforts yesterday.
365.2 The provision of Water Code Section 80110 requiring the
commission to suspend the right of customers to engage in direct access
and take electric service from an alternate provider is hereby repealed.
=====================================
|
1,565 |
Subject: Arrived in London
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/2275.
=====================================
---------------------- Forwarded by Bruno Gaillard/EU/Enron on 11/10/2000
09:26 ---------------------------
Bruno Gaillard
11/10/2000 09:21
To: [email protected], Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Joseph
Alamo/NA/Enron@Enron, [email protected], Sandra McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES,
Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES, Robert Frank/NA/Enron@Enron, Elizabeth
Linnell/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Marcie
Milner/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Arrived in London
Hi Guys
How are you all. We arrived about three weeks ago, and I started work about
two weeks ago - I got plenty to do.
We are doing good, Milo had trouble with the jet lag initially, which meant
that we weren't affected by if since he didn't let us sleep. Kate is a bit
homesick as she is having trouble making friends with the baby and all, but
we'll work it out.
We are staying in a temporary place. rents here are just as bad as in SF but
we will eventually find a place.
London is cool apart from the whether. Its as if someone from every nation is
living in this city.
Hope all of you are good.
my phone # here is 44 20 7783 4661
Take care
Bruno
=====================================
|
1,566 |
Subject: Re: Help, Help!
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/633.
=====================================
cool. sorry i couldn't be of more help. it's meltdown in the land of fruits
and nuts.
Susan Scott
10/12/2000 03:00 PM
To: Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: Help, Help!
My hero!
Jeffery Fawcett
10/12/2000 02:59 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Help, Help!
As usual, help was only a phone call [to Jeff Dasovich] away. You 'da man.
I went to the site and found (via reference links) the stats I needed.
Thanks.
From: Jeff Dasovich on 10/12/2000 11:51 AM
To: Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: Help, Help!
hmm. that makes it tougher. it's crisis central today. for quick answers
try the ISO website (caiso.com). i think you can find all that you need. if
not get back to me.
Jeffery Fawcett
10/12/2000 10:56 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: Help, Help!
yesteday (he says sheepishly)
From: Jeff Dasovich on 10/12/2000 09:34 AM
To: Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: Help, Help!
I can help, but what's your timing?
=====================================
|
1,567 |
Subject: RE: Peace Letter to CalPERS
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/2128.
=====================================
Good plan.
-----Original Message-----
From: Denne, Karen
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 7:09 PM
To: Steffes, James D.
Cc: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: RE: Peace Letter to CalPERS
I talked to Steve.. we won't respond, but I'm passing the letter along to Ben Glisan's team so they can follow up w/ Calpers.
-----Original Message-----
From: Steffes, James D.
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 6:37 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff; Shapiro, Richard; Kean, Steven J.; Mara, Susan; Denne, Karen; Palmer, Mark A. (PR)
Subject: RE: Peace Letter to CalPERS
I don't think that Govt Affairs should do anything on this (and not sure if there is anything to do).
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 6:22 PM
To: Shapiro, Richard; Kean, Steven J.; Steffes, James D.; Mara, Susan; Denne, Karen; Palmer, Mark A. (PR)
Subject: Peace Letter to CalPERS
I saw the letter from Peace to CalPERS. As far as I know, Peace can't force CalPERS to do anything, including file a shareholder suit. Therefore, I'm not sure if we gain anything by responding, or taking other action. Thoughts?
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
1,568 |
Subject: Re: Sam Shepard Play
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/429.
=====================================
Any of those days work EXCEPT the 22nd.
Prentice Sellers <[email protected]>
09/28/2000 03:19 PM
To: [email protected], Cameron Sellers <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Re: Sam Shepard Play
Please tell me all the dates you can make it and which kinds of seats you
want. According to the Tickets.com website, tickets are still available
for all these days for both types of seats.
Here are your options:
Rear Balcony = $40
Top Price = $55
Wednesday - November 8
Thursday - November 9
Wednesday - November 15 -- Mom's bday. Should we see if she wants to go?
Thursday - November 16
Wednesday - November 22 -- Night before Thanksgiving
Wednesday - November 29
Thursday - November 30
Wednesday - December 6
Wednesday - December 13
Thursday - December 14
At 01:59 PM 9/28/2000 -0500, you wrote:
>What time do you get home from school. If it's before 5 could you stop by
>the Theater on the Square box office and get tickets? Cameron said that
>she and Scott want tickets, too. It's going to sell out (if it ain't
>already sold out), so we should probably do it quickly.
>
>I love you.
=====================================
|
1,569 |
Subject: Re: FW: Rocky Grass Academy Waiting List
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/10198.
=====================================
Hey babe. I called you last nite re: ROI model, but only got the answering
machine. Forward along to me and I'll take a peek and get back to you.
How's the face doing? When do you leave on travel?
Cameron Sellers <[email protected]>
03/20/2001 05:12 PM
To: "'PP'" <[email protected]>, "'Scott Laughlin'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: FW: Rocky Grass Academy Waiting List
FYI
Cameron Sellers
Vice President, Business Development
PERFECT
1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210
Palo Alto, CA 94303
[email protected]
650.798.3366 (direct dial)
650.269.3366 (cell)
650.858.1095 (fax)
-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew Bretz [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 11:06 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Rocky Grass Academy Waiting List
Hiya,
Sorry to be a pest but....
Can you get any idea from Steve's past experience whether the rest of my
friends who are on witing lists are liable to get into their workshops?
Scott Laughlin Mandolin
Jeff Dasovitch Guitar
Prentiss Sellars Banjo
Thanks,
Matty
=====================================
|
1,570 |
Subject: Re: Draft program
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/877.
=====================================
Rob,
I find option 3 closest to what I was suggesting, and think that captures an
approach that keeps GSPP in the role of encouraging improved policy.
Any of the options are acceptable. I think time is going to be an issue.
Thanks for putting this together.
Bill
[email protected] on 08/30/2000 06:38:46 AM
Please respond to [email protected]
To: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], William Hederman/TCO/ColumbiaGas@COLUMBIAGAS
cc:
Subject: Draft program
Shall we try to talk again Monday? I think I will talk to Borenstein to see
what the Haas folks have in mind.
I tried to capture everyone's comments. Allen, you might want to explain more
about your panel suggestions since I didn't do them justice. As you'll see I
took the liberty of offering a new characterization of the panels that I
didn't
bring up on the call. Everything on there is offered as a strawman to be
criticized and changed.
Rob <<Draft program.doc>>
Rob Gramlich
PJM Market Monitoring Unit
(610) 666-4291
[email protected]
- Draft program.doc
=====================================
|
1,571 |
Subject: California Update 4/12/01
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/11011.
=====================================
? Sources report that SoCal Chairman, John Bryson, and Governor Davis were
roommates together at Stanford in the early 60's. This longstanding
relationship may provide some explanation for SoCal's willingness to
negotiate with the governor and the governor's determination to reach a
solution with SoCal.
? Voluntary bankruptcy reportedly is "not an option" for SoCal. However, the
possibility remains that SoCal's creditors will take them into involuntary
bankruptcy. If the state's purchase of the transmission assets is delayed,
it appears that the possibility of this occurring will increase.
? However, the agreement by the state to purchase SoCal's transmission assets
is actually a Memorandum of Understanding. The agreement reportedly was
rushed for "political purposes," but the details still remain to be decided.
It is possible, the 60-day deadline stated in the memorandum may have to be
extended.
? PG&E reportedly refused to part with its transmission assets in its
negotiations with the governor. PG&E makes more money on transmission than
distribution of power, the opposite is true for SoCal.
=====================================
|
1,572 |
Subject: Re: 1st Draft of what we should lobby for in special california
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/8276.
=====================================
Scott:
Could you please see that Sandi gets this? Thanks. If folks would like to
get Sandi information (e.g., the load curtailment proposal discussed by Gary
yesterday), please send to Scott, who's with our lobbying firm in
Sacramento. Sandi, Scott (Stoness) would like to discuss this proposal on
tomorrow's (Friday's) 8:00 AM conference call. Thank you.
Best,
Jeff
Scott Stoness@EES
01/11/2001 08:26 AM
To: Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Evan
Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Eric Melvin/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Gahn/HOU/EES@EES,
Gordon Savage/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Ken
Gustafson/HOU/EES@EES, Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES, Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES, Wanda
Curry/HOU/EES@EES, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Gary Weiss/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: 1st Draft of what we should lobby for in special california
legislation process
1st Draft of what we should lobby for in special california legislation
process from Scott Stoness for comment
Jeff Dasovich. Can you please get this to Sandy McCubbin for our 10AM
discussion.
=====================================
|
1,573 |
Subject: Re: FW: Finance project
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/2387.
=====================================
Beautiful. Tuesday it is. Have a great weekend.
Jacqueline Kelly <[email protected]>
10/13/2000 02:03 PM
To: "Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: FW: Finance project
Kupiecki sent me an e-mail this morning about getting together for our
project soon. How does Tuesday at break sound?
-----Original Message-----
From: Jacqueline Kelly
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2000 10:41 AM
To: 'Kimberly Kupiecki'
Subject: RE: Finance project
Sounds good to me!
Do you want to try to read the case on our own and meet during the break on
Tuesday to discuss?
Let me know what you think!
-JACKIE
-----Original Message-----
From: Kimberly Kupiecki [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2000 10:15 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Finance project
Hi Kelly,
What do you think about the idea of getting our group together to talk
about the finance project soon? If we wait too long, it will sneak up on
us.
Cheers,
Kimberly Kupiecki
Senior Account Executive
A&R Partners
[email protected]
(650) 762 2800 main
(650) 762 2825 direct
fax (650) 762 2801
=====================================
|
1,574 |
Subject: Transmission value and first mortgage debt
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/9461.
=====================================
----- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 02/27/2001 01:08 PM -----
Michael Tribolet/ENRON@enronXgate
02/27/2001 09:41 AM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, David W Delainey/HOU/EES@EES,
[email protected]@SMTP@enronXgate
cc:
Subject: Transmission value and first mortgage debt
The proposed purchase of the PGE and SCE's transmission grids have vastly
different short term liquidity effects for PGE and SCE. If the current
proposal is at 2.3x book, and assuming the first mortgage bond holders want
complete repayment in return for releasing their liens, the numbers (at
12-99) fall out:
in millions PGE SCE
Book Value 1.43 1.90
Multiple of Book 2.3x 2.3x
Cash Price $3.29 $4.37
-First Mortgage Bonds $3.35 $1.18
Resulting liquidity ($0.06) $3.19
Note that the first mortgage holders may release their liens in return for
partial payment based on remaining value. Nonetheless, PGE's situation is
not as flexible.
=====================================
|
1,575 |
Subject: Talked to Peevey
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/3473.
=====================================
Just talked to Peevey. He told me that he and Freeman personally worked with
Bilas on Bilas' draft decision--the decision designed to make CDWR
creditworthy and keep the PUC from touching Direct Access until the
Legislature has a chance to fix the AB1X prohibition.
I made the pitch re: decision does what it takes to fix the creditworthy
issue and the Commission needs to vote it out immediately. He said he agreed
but expressed his general frustration with the decision making process
generally, and said that he is not certain right now if the decision is
greased to get voted out at the next Commission meeting.
He said that he's going to be talking to the Governor this afternoon and will
push the issue with him. I asked him to keep me updated. He said that he
would.
I told him that it wasn't helpful that the Governor named names in New York
regarding alleged agreements about "haircuts," particularly when folks are
trying to negotiate deals with DWR. He wasn't aware of that and asked me to
fax him the Merril press, which I did. I'll also fax him our letter
supporting the Bilas decision.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
1,576 |
Subject: Outstanding Accounts Payable to IEP From Members
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/1234.
=====================================
As you are aware, IEP has endured a number of staff changes over the past
few months, primarily in the accounting/office management functions.? As a
result, we have been delinquent in sending invoices to member companies for
their dues and/or special fund commitments?made during the year 2000.?
However, we also have been modifying our accounts payable (AP) and accounts
receivable (AR) procedures, essentially shifting the tracking of these
accounts to our external accountant.?
?
Accordingly, our external accountant (Dan Ross Accountancy) will be sending
invoices to IEP members for outstanding dues and/or special fund commitments
which have yet to be paid.? Some of these amounts may be for commitments
last spring.? We ask your indulgence as we become current.? Some
commitments/checks may have slipped through the cracks during this period.?
?
We thank you for your patience and prompt response to the invoices you will
be receiving in the near future.? Upon receipt of these invoices, if you
have any questions, you may contact Ann Ross (IEP's external accountant) at
916/635-1424 or me.?
?
?
=====================================
|
1,577 |
Subject: HTC presents iTV on Thursday 12/06
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/984.
=====================================
What is iTV? What is one of the fastest growing technology and consumer
sectors? Come to the last HTC lecture of the semester and find out. Mark
your diary today. Refreshments from 5.30pm. Everyone welcome.
Haas Technology Club Fall Lecture Series
presents
"Bringing an interactive TV (iTV) service to life"
by
Paul Mitchell, Senior Director
Microsoft TV
Date: Thursday, December 6th, 2001
Time: 6:00 to 7:00 p.m. with refreshments from 5:30 p.m.
Location: C220
Paul Mitchell is senior director for the Microsoft TV Group at Microsoft
Corporation. In this capacity, he is responsible for Microsoft's overall
support and promotional programs for the content and application
development community. Mitchell also leads the platform's representation in
various TV standards organizations.
Topics to be covered include:
- What are the challenges in bringing an iTV service to life with real,
compelling content?
- What is Microsoft's strategy in the iTV market?
- How well are they executing this strategy and why?
- What are the issues and problems faced in putting strategic alliances
together?
Mark your diary today!
=====================================
|
1,578 |
Subject: Re: Even the best laid plans...
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/mba__financial_reporting/15.
=====================================
Well it appears that Jimmy is the only one with too much time on his
hands. Anyway, I am at home today and got to my part. It is
attached. Please let me know if you feel I should add anything. I am
leaving very early Sunday morning to go on a business trip for the week. I
will not be in class Monday or Tuesday and do not get back to the Bay area
until Saturday. I will be checking my email so let me know what I need to
do for the next case.
Thanks for taking responsibility for this case Jeff.
Dylan
At 11:04 AM 9/15/00 -0500, [email protected] wrote:
>Well, I was clearly too ambitious in setting out the schedule. My
>apologies. I managed to trudge through the reading and the document last
>night, but didn't not get to answering the question. I appears that this
>will be a busy weekend. I've a feeling that I won't get my proposed answer
>to folks until Saturday afternoon for your review. If that poses a problem
>for anyone, please let me know. I still intend to be the compiler of
>wisdom, so folks should feel free to distribute when they've got something
>drafted.
>
>Best,
>Jeff
- Patten case.doc
=====================================
|
1,579 |
Subject: Re: DRAFT Principles for Use with Possible Coalition
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/9641.
=====================================
Brilliant work.
From: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON on 03/05/2001 11:19 AM CST
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron,
[email protected], Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, [email protected],
Scott Govenar <[email protected]>, [email protected], Janel
Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, John Neslage/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: DRAFT Principles for Use with Possible Coalition
We discussed on Friday the need to draft some basic, core principles that
could unite a large, broad base of consumer (and other) support in the
on-going effort (to quote today's WSJ editorial) to inject some "brains"
into California's "no brains" proposals.
Here is a first whack. It draws from the one-pager drafted last week for use
in Sacramento to describe our "constructive proposal." Many thanks to Paul
for his help. The document is in "strike-out-underline" mode. Please edit
directly (and freely) and send back to me and Ken.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
1,580 |
Subject: RE: B-to-B
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/mba__e_commerce/21.
=====================================
Cameron,
Will do....
Jeff, if you want to chat, I'll be happy to meet with you....in person or
via phone. I've spent the past year and a half in the B-to-B space focusing
on automated and electronic procurement processes.
My number is 650-858-1920.
Best Regards,
Mike D.
-----Original Message-----
From: Cameron Sellers
Sent: Monday, March 20, 2000 1:12 PM
To: Mike Davenport
Cc: 'Jeff Dasovich'; '[email protected]'
Subject: FW:
The contact at Haas is Jeff Dasovich and his email address is
[email protected].
His work phone number (daytime) is: (415) 782-7822
Could you please send him the PRD as soon as you get it from Cherryl
tomorrow.
Thank you so much!!
Cameron
Cameron Sellers
Vice President, Business Development
PERFECT.COM
1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210
Palo Alto, CA 94303
[email protected]
650.858.7719 (direct dial)
650.858.1095 (fax)
650.208.9455 (cell)
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, March 20, 2000 12:14 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE:
already got the MRD. Just need the PRD. Tomorrow's just dandy.
=====================================
|
1,581 |
Subject: RE: Class Final
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/1871.
=====================================
Appreciate the speedy response. Actually, it's a "personal" event opposed to
a business reason, and though important, I don't think it clears your
hurdle. No problem. Never hurts to inquire, and I appreciate the
consideration.
Best,
Jeff
"Jonathan Berk" <[email protected]>
09/28/2000 04:01 PM
Please respond to berk
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: Class Final
Jeff ---
I would rather you not. My policy on these matters goes something like
this. If you have a valid reason like you are out of town on business, then
you can take the exam by fax as close to the actual time as possible,
certainly on the same day.
--- Jonathan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 1:34 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Class Final
>
>
> Greetings Professor:
>
> Apologies for asking, but something has come up and I wanted to inquire
> about the chances of taking the E203 final on a day other than Sunday the
> 10th of December. Preferably Tu, W, Th, the week of the 11th.
>
> Best,
> Jeff
>
>
=====================================
|
1,582 |
Subject: Re: What is the Reaction from SDG&E, SCE, and PG&E to FERC
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/810.
=====================================
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 11/01/2000 04:56 PM -----
Jeff Dasovich
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
11/01/2000 03:00 PM
To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mona L
Petrochko/NA/Enron@ENRON, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@ENRON, Susan J
Mara/SFO/EES@EES
Subject: Re: What is the Reaction from SDG&E, SCE, and PG&E to FERC Decision?
Got calls in to Richard at PG&E and Reed at Sempra. Will report back.
James D Steffes
11/01/2000 01:28 PM
To: Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/SFO/EES@EES
cc: Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: What is the Reaction from SDG&E, SCE, and PG&E to FERC Decision?
Can you guys look into (quietly) the perspectives of the three utilities on
the FERC decision? It would be interesting to know especially about the
question of refunds?
Other parties perspectives would also be helpful.
Jim
=====================================
|
1,583 |
Subject: Re: Bob Hillman in Northern California
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/6068.
=====================================
Jeff,
Dan is one of those guys whose talent oozes from them. He makes songwriting
look easy, though I suspect it isn't as easy as it seems. Obviously, his
imagination is limitless, and there's plenty to be said for his craft. If I
wanted to criticize him, I might suggest he rein (reign?) in his act just a
little bit, in order to emphasize the songs over the personailty. His real
personality, by the way, is mellow and understated and very unlike his stage
persona. Go figure!
bh
PS By the way, why did you try to steal my cell phone on Friday morning?
If you have no idea what I'm talking about, ask Prentice.
----- Original Message -----
From: <[email protected]>
To: "Bob Hillman" <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2000 1:33 PM
Subject: Re: Bob Hillman in Northern California
>
> Bob:
>
> I want to let you know that I stand in awe of someone who has the balls to
> open for someone as talented as Dan B. It demonstrates that you're one
> talented guy yourself. Congratulations. Your show was great, and it was
> good to see you. Best of luck on the rest of the tour.
>
> Best,
> Jeff
>
>
=====================================
|
1,584 |
Subject: RE: Case, #3,4
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/mba__financial_reporting/7.
=====================================
I got a call from Christine around lunch, pointing out here input to 3 and
4. I added one of here paragraph to #3. Let me know immediately if you
disagree with the change. We also need to talk tonight about how we're
going to coordinate these cases in the future. I can't work on these cases
at work (I'm a supervisor in a union environment). I got Christine's email
Sunday at 10:53 pm and it was not combined with Jeff and Kim's. Lets make
sure we have a commitment tonight on how we're going to execute these in the
future!
Jimmy
<<AZTECA~1.DOC>>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [SMTP:[email protected]]
> Sent: October 08, 2000 8:34 PM
> To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Case, #3,4
>
> I've compiled and attached what I'm calling the final case. Dylan, I made
>
> some changes to #1. Let me know if you see any fatal flaws. If not this
> is
> what I will copy and deliver to class.
> Jimmy << File: AZTECA~1.DOC >>
- AZTECA~1.DOC
=====================================
|
1,585 |
Subject: Fwd: BCAP decision and rates
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/134.
=====================================
Things are wild, but as long as you keep your sense of humor and
perspective ...
Here is a cut and pasted answer. Brian is a fairly careful guy. The
segmentation did not really do anything at least at the level of 3.3
cents/therm.
Short-term memory, since I had remember 3.5.
Let me know if you need any more digging.
Bob
> We received a copy of the BCAP final decision today. Starting June
>1, the EG rate for generators using more than 3 million therms per year
>(which includes all EGA members) will be 3.333 cents per therm, a
>substantial reduction from the existing rates. This rate may go up very
>slightly later in the year, because the Commission has ordered the utilities
>to file a joint application proposing segmented EG rates with a cap of about
>4.1 cents per therm for the smaller generators ( usage of less than 3
>million therms per year). The revenue shortfall resulting from the cap will
>be picked up by the larger users, but we do not expect this effect to
>increase the rate significantly. We also expect that the ITCS component
>will be reduced next year (1/1/01), further reducing rates.
>
=====================================
|
1,586 |
Subject: SB 1817: Income and bank and corporation taxes: credit: Internet
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/eci/64.
=====================================
SB 1817: Income and bank and corporation taxes: credit: Internet, Author:=
=20
Murray, 2/24/00
Sponsor: Author
This bill would authorize a credit against those taxes (Personal and=20
Corporate) for each taxable and income year beginning on or after January 1=
,=20
2000, and before January 1, 2006, in an amount equal to an unspecified amou=
nt=20
for any taxpayer who provides an Internet connection and an Internet access=
=20
device without charge to a low-income household.
Specifically "For each income year beginning on or after January 1, 2000,=
=20
and before January 1, 2006, there shall be allowed as a credit against the=
=20
=01&tax,=018 as defined in Section 23036, an amount equal to ____ ($____) t=
o any=20
taxpayer who provides an Internet connection and an Internet access device=
=20
without charge to a low-income household."
Position:
Yet an other Low Income/universal access bill to reduce the "digital divide=
".=20
However this time the person or corporation will get a tax credit for=20
providing free Internet access to low-income. What is our position? Should=
=20
we Watch the bill?
Attached is the bill
=====================================
|
1,587 |
Subject: Revised CESG Outline
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/7807.
=====================================
A revised CESG outline is attached, updated to reflect Friday's
discussion. While we discussed much greater detail, I have continued to
try to keep the outline more general to avoid generating a treatise at
this point. Particularly, we discussed much greater detail around the
rate stabilization plan than is reflected in the attached outline.
SCE has committed to providing some sort of percentage or tiered term
structure for forward contracting to complete that section of the
framework (section 2). Obviously, PG&E's ideas in this area would also
be welcome.
In Section 4 (undercollections) I have thrown in the numbers provided to
the Chronicle for the Saturday morning article describing the extent to
which the utilities may have already committed to Governor Davis to
absorb undercollections. (Which leads to the question for John and Dan,
again, whether we are wasting our time with this exercise given the
media coverage describing the state of the IOU deal.)
Delaney has committed to provide a call-in number for tomorrow's 3:30
conference call. Thank you all again for your efforts.
- CESG Working Draft 121700.doc
=====================================
|
1,588 |
Subject: FW: Bob Hillman in Emeryville 10/10
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/482.
=====================================
Please note name of venue.
-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Hillman [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 4:56 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Bob Hillman in Emeryville 10/10
Dear Everyone,
I will be performing at Strings in the East Bay on Wednesday, October 10th. It's a homey room and extremely artist-friendly, so far off the corporate path that the owner doesn't advertise or even publish the address on the web. Of course, it's not so homey that you can't get a drink, and it's close enough to the pulse that artists like Shawn Mullins still appear there regularly. For those of you wary of crossing the Bay Bridge, it really isn't all that far (20-30 minutes), and this may be your last chance to catch my act this year. Here are the details:
Bob Hillman
Wednesday, 10 October
8pm
Strings
6320 San Pablo Ave.
Emeryville
(510) 653-5700
www.strings.org <http://www.strings.org/>
Also appearing: Forest Sun
Directions from San Francisco:
Bay Bridge
80 East
Ashby Ave. Exit towards Berkeley
Turn right on San Pablo Ave.
Strings is on the left next to the beauty salon
See you there!
=====================================
|
1,589 |
Subject: carpooling to class
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/90.
=====================================
Please delete if not interested in carpooling to class from downtown San
Francisco.
Hi everyone,
Last year a few of us first years (now second) ran a pretty successful
carpool from downtown San Francisco over to Haas. It makes sense for quite a
few reasons, and is a pretty good way to get to know each other. This year I
thought we should target everyone who might be interested. I've created an
egroup called haascarpool. If you're interested please go to
www.egroups.com/group/haascarpool
and join up. The calendar will be how we can arrange carpools. I've listed
that I'll be driving this t/th, how many people I can take, when I'll leave,
and what time I'll be in class. People can post if they can drive or need a
ride. You can e-mail people individually when you check the calendar. This
way we centralize everything and avoid tons of e-mails. Suggestions are
welcome.
Cheers,
Michael
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.
=====================================
|
1,590 |
Subject: nan
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/25.
=====================================
Hello everyone,
I guess you all have been wondering what is wrong and why I have been out of the office. No Mr. Wong it's not Anthrax!
I have been ill for a while but not as bad as I am currently doing............I have had diabetes for the past six years and a heart that likes to act up every once in a while. These two sometimes don't mix well and currently my situation has gotten a little worse. On Sunday I got really ill and my face and arm on the right side were really numb, which are signs of an early stroke. It is not the first time that it has happened and I am taking medication to control my current situation. I am also waiting on results from the doctor on my kidneys diagnosis.
People with diabetes have extra reason to be mindful of heart and blood vessel disease. Diabetes carries an increased risk for heart attack, stroke, and complications related to poor circulation.
I just want to make you all aware of what is going on with me and to let you know that I am taking my medication and will try to do a better job in taking care of myself.
Hopefully we can all get back to work as usual.
Thanks,
Cristina
=====================================
|
1,591 |
Subject: Re: Haley & Wil's Christmas lists
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/1017.
=====================================
Greetings all,
My @home e-mail is defunct and I am not up on the new one yet. Fortunately, I
kept my AOL account but I am back in the Dark Ages on a phone line with no
DSL availability (slow, slow slow) and it ties up the phone.
Anyway, Charry, could you send the list for Wil and Haley to me at
[email protected].
Jeff asked me to send a list for my kids:
Katie:
1) would like a trip downtown with Aunt Nancy and Haley at Christmas time to
go window shopping
2) 1/2 hour massage
3)music CD with Andean music
she's also asked for cool hair accessories and stationery but I think Mike's
family is getting these
Michael:
1) fleece vest
2) anything about baseball or football (books,games)
3)sleeveless shirts (might be tough to find this time of year)
4) time with any of you on an outing
BIG SECRET: Santa is bringing both kids a Gameboy so a game would be good.
Robert already got Katie a Harry Potter game.
Target has Sponge Bob Square Pants and Rocket Power which I think Michael
would like.
ALSO, everyone is invited to Christmas at our house, like last year, if you
haven't been formally notified already.
Debbie
=====================================
|
1,592 |
Subject: Re: PG&E Gas
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/2787.
=====================================
Thanks. Was aware of the power/gas split, but FYI, Chris Foster on the
Portland desk is a great source of information--Midmarket electricity trader
and a very straightforward guy.
Karen Denne
01/02/2001 11:40 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: PG&E Gas
Apparently their credit limit has not been reached. They haven't been doing
any deals, but because PG&E hasn't been online. I didn't realize that the
Portland office only does power sales. Gas desk is in Houston. I'll let you
know if I find out anything more.
From: Jeff Dasovich on 01/02/2001 11:29 AM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: PG&E Gas
Thanks. I was literally just about to call the Portland desk. You saved me
the trouble. Did they say whether they have any plans to cut PG&E off (from
gas sales) in the near future?
Karen Denne
01/02/2001 11:26 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: PG&E Gas
FYI, Mark just walked down to the trading floor, and we have not stopped
selling to PG&E. Apparently, the ISO put out another list and we're on it. kd
=====================================
|
1,593 |
Subject: CAC and EPUC Application Requesting Investigation into Practices of
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/1846.
=====================================
On November 20, 2000, the Cogeneration Association of California and the
Energy Producers and Users Coalition filed an application seeking relief
pursuant to Public Utilities Code Section 372(f). This code provision
provides that the Commission and the EOB shall determine if any
policy/action of the ISO unreasonably discourages the connection of existing
or new self generation or cogeneration and, if they determine that
actions/policies of the ISO do that, then they must take efforts to revise
such polices/actions.
CAC/EPUC are basically claiming that policies advanced and/or imposed by the
ISO are (or will) imposing unneeded and unreasonable economic burdens on
customers who would otherwise choose a self-generation alternative. They
are asking that the Commission, in conjunction with the EOB, to undertake an
immediate investigation of the ISO actions and take remedial actions
necessary to eliminate the ISO's actions which have the effect of
disouraging he development and interconnection of retail customer owned
generation.
Please let me know if you are interested in more details or a copy of the
application.
Jeanne
=====================================
|
1,594 |
Subject: Duque Ruling Issued
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/2945.
=====================================
Attached is a ruling just issued by Commissioner Duque with regard to the
SCE and PG&E emergency petitions for modification concerning the end of the
rate freeze decisions.? (Interestingly, the version sent out shows redlining
from an earlier draft. The most interesting change was the deletion of the
sentence, "Nevertheless, the accounting modifications contemplated are all
that we can reasonably resolve in the remaining four Commission meeting
dates left in year 2000.")?
?
Duque reiterates a commitment to reaching a final decision on accounting
issues by the end of the year.? The TURN proposal will obviously get primary
attention.
?
He also says that, "at the December 21, 2000 Commission meeting, I will
sponsor an Order Instituting Investigation (OII) that will open a proceeding
to address any residual TRA undercollection problems affecting PG&E and
SCE.? Such an OII will offer an appropriate forum for addressing this issue
in a comprehensive way, and it will provide an opportunity to develop a full
record on this matter."
?
Dan
- CPUC01-#82809-v1-A9901016_et_al_Duque_Ruling_Revised_11_1__.doc
=====================================
|
1,595 |
Subject: Search Committee for New Dean
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/681.
=====================================
>October 11, 2001
>
>
>
>FACULTY, STUDENTS, AND STAFF
>Haas School of Business
>
>Dean Tyson has indicated her intention to step down as Dean of the School
>at the end of June 2002. A committee has been formed to search and make
>recommendations for a new dean of the School. The members of the committee
>are:
>
>Assistant Dean Barbara Horst Broque, Haas School of Business
>Professor Barry Eichengreen, Economics
>Mr. Hans Grande, Graduate Student, Haas School of Business
>Mr. Robert D. Haas, Chairman of the Board, Levi Strauss & CO.
>Professor Herma Hill Kay, Boalt School of Law
>Professor David J. Vogel, Haas School of Business
>Professor James A. Wilcox, Haas School of Business
>Professor Janet L. Yellen, Haas School of Business
>
>Professor Mark Lemley, Boalt Hall School of Law, will serve as Chair of
>the Committee. The committee will consult with the School community both
>for suggestions and views on candidates. Your participation and
>cooperation in the search process will be appreciated.
>
>
>
>
>Jan de Vries
>Vice Provost
>Academic Affairs
>and Faculty Welfare
>
>cc: Dean Tyson
Members of the Search Committee
=====================================
|
1,596 |
Subject: Re: Lay Tour
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/3892.
=====================================
I sensed the same thing. Sue's been calling me -- sort of freaking out over
documents etc. Not sure why. I'm here for about 20 more minutes and then I
have to go to a lunch/baby shower for one of the gals here. Call me on the
cell if you don't get me at work. 713-851-3778 cell.
From: Jeff Dasovich on 04/27/2001 10:29 AM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Lay Tour
Hi:
I'm going to call you in a bit--I'm on a conference call right now. We need
to coordinate just a wee bit. Landwehr's all over Rosie, and we're getting
mixed up between her RGA meetings and the CA meetings. I talked to her a
little this AM and expressed a concern that we not get poor Rosie all wrapped
around an axle and confused. We may have several points of contact here for
various issues. No big deal, but I want to make sure things don't get more
complicated than they need to be. I'll forward you a note from Sue to Rosie
(and me) that you weren't on. Also want to talk about your voicemail last
night--i.e., I may need to travel with KL, which is fine by me if that's
necessary.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
1,597 |
Subject: FW: West Point Parties in August
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/12032.
=====================================
Hey Guys,
Molly and I are having two West Point Inn parties in August and we would
love you guys to come to one or both of them. Jeff, it would be great if
you could bring the ice again. Below is the e-mail with all the info.
Hope to see you soon.
Sean
Hey Everyone,
Attached below are invites to a couple of overnight affairs I am organizing
up on Mt. Tam in August. I have reserved the West Point Inn on both August
4 and August 18th. It is usually a great great time. People hike up
there, and hang out all
afternoon and evening and then sleep over. We cook dinner and do various
things in the evening (ie games, singing, guitar, etc.). EVERYONE helps
with the process (ie cooking, cleaning, etc.). In the morning we will make
up breakfast.
The cost is $50 per person. This covers lodging ($30 per person), snacks,
dinner, drinks, and breakfast. People should not have to bring anything to
eat or drink except for maybe water for the hike.
I usually try to have a mix of couples and singles to make it fun for
everyone. I hope you can make it. Let me know if you are interested.
Sean
- wp8_4_1.doc
- wp8_18_1.doc
=====================================
|
1,598 |
Subject: View on Exit Fees
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/28198.
=====================================
Wednesday morning, June 27 (before the CPUC decision to delay the vote on
DA), I gave Marty Sunde this view on exit fees and surcharges for DWR costs
in the California market:
There is a 75% probability that customers who go to direct access and who
used utility service between January and June 2001 will pay an exit fee
calculated as the difference between market price and utility rates during
that period. The exit fee could also include the going forward costs or
alternatively, those costs could be passed along in the form of a uniform
surcharge. In other words, with regard to past costs, regulators or
legislators would require DA customers to pay the amount they belive had been
sucked from the state during the January-June crisis period. I said the
"retroactive ratemaking" argument is a nicety that California could easily
dispense with.
Now that we know the CPUC decision will be delayed, I think the probability
of exit fees for retroactive costs is even higher - either the DA legislation
will pass between now and July 3, or Carl Wood will change the PUC order to
get the "jailbreaking" customers to pay up.
=====================================
|
1,599 |
Subject: Broadband Coalition
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/eci/4.
=====================================
Sue et al---as we discussed last week, Scott Bolton and I had a conference
call on Friday with a coalition that is forming to promote national broadband
infrastructure policies. The members are currently Global Crossing (Michael
Freedman), Level 3 (Jim Pribyl), Williams and Quest.
The preliminary game plan of the coaltion is to target this policy initiative
in states where 1) there are currently problems or impediments such as bad
legislation or strong pushes for franchise fees for broadband 2) states with
opportunities 3)states where we collectively have heavy presence such as west
coast/east coast. The intent is to have only a few companies involved--about
5 or 6, with a commitment of time from the members and probably some
financial commitment in the $25,000 to $50,000 range over time (I'm thinking
12-18 months)
I will be seeing a few of these guys at the RGA meeting in Tampa at the end
of the week, and there will be another formal meeting in the next 3 or 4
weeks which Scott is going to try to attend.
I'd appreciate if if we could discuss at our EBS conference call on Monday
morning if there is time.
=====================================
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.