dataset_id
int64 0
5.47k
| email_body
stringlengths 800
9.73k
|
|---|---|
1,700 |
Subject: CDWR Update
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/3136.
=====================================
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 02/08/2001 12:45 PM -----
Christopher F Calger@ECT
02/08/2001 11:23 AM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, John J
Lavorato/Corp/Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: CDWR Update
Gentlemen:
I have spoken with CDWR several times since we submitted our proposal. They
are immediately interested in a 5 year power sale and then want to discuss
Pastoria. I updated a price for Freeman for 200MW Peak SP-15 5 Year
($124/MWh). I also spoke with their lawyers a couple of times to start
trading comments. I volunteered to send a team to LA today or tomorrow, but
so far they prefer to discuss by phone. Their lawyers acknowledge that the
primary issue for suppliers is credit. They are working on an agreement with
CPUC that would ensure that CDWR would have an adequate revenue stream to
support the contracts. Their intent is to make the supply contracts have
priority over the bonds. Until that happens, we maintain that we require a
cash prepayment or letter of credit to support any deal. I expect to hear
from them again later today. I will keep you posted.
Regards,
Chris
=====================================
|
1,701 |
Subject: prelim numbers on expected generation cost increases for CA bundled
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/9077.
=====================================
The impact on the book for the PG&E and SCE increases described below would be
April to December 2001: $86.9 million ($38.8 mm PG&E; $48.1 mm SCE)
For whole book, $195 million (PV).
/Tamara.
---------------------- Forwarded by Tamara Johnson/HOU/EES on 02/13/2001
10:15 AM ---------------------------
Tamara Johnson
02/13/2001 10:16 AM
To: Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Marcus Dotson/HOU/EES@EES, Jodi Thrasher/HOU/EES@EES, Yasir
Khan/HOU/EES@EES, Greg Cordell/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: prelim numbers on expected generation cost increases for CA bundled
rates
I have reviewed the preliminary drafts by the 3 CA IOU's with respect to
required generation purchases.
My analysis shows that bundled customers would need to see the following
increase in the generation portion of their bundled rate to pay for the
shortfall (increase above the $10/MWh). I used $90/MWh as an average rate
for the DWR purchases.
PG&E $12/MWh
SCE $23/MWh
Note that this does not recover any past undercollections for previously
purchased energy. PG&E is proposing an adder of $7/MWh for undercollections.
For SDG&E, the currently rate-capped customers (at $65/MWh) would need to see
a $43/MWh increase.
=====================================
|
1,702 |
Subject: FW: Peter's New Firm
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/personal/14.
=====================================
Here's the e-mail I sent, thought I'd try out the address.
-----Original Message-----
From: Terri Wilsie [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, April 23, 2000 7:07 PM
To: Jeffrey Dasovich
Subject: Peter's New Firm
All his complaining turned out to be real after all. Peter left Landels in
a group of six environmental partners (including Landels' biggest rainmaker)
on Friday and is now a partner at Farella, Braun and Martell. It is a
medium-size, SF-based firm of about 100 lawyers that did not have an
environmental dept before. There was a lot of drama at Landels over the
last month as this was taking place, but Peter is very happy to be leaving
and thinks the new firm is going to work out great. I don't know, but they
do have a wine country office and represent Mondavi and Frog's Leap and a
few others so I might get a weekend trip or at least some wine out of the
deal. You can read all about it in the SF Legal Recorder and Daily Journal
legal newspapers from last week. Peter's group is covered in Friday's
editions. Peter's new office number is 954-4940 and is at [email protected].
I'm still plugging away for your so-called competition. How's life? How's
school?
=====================================
|
1,703 |
Subject: RE: Energy Summit II, May 4, 2001
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/11805.
=====================================
Dear Silicon Valley Leader:
Once again, we are inviting you to Silicon Valley's second Regional Energy
Summit, co-hosted by the Silicon Valley Manufacturing Group, the City of San
Jose and the County Board of Supervisors, to develop quantifiable, near-term
solutions to avoid rolling black-outs, by emphasizing
--conservation
--shifting load during peak periods
--immediate generation
--sound public policies
Details are as follows:
Date: Friday, May 4, 2001
Time: 8 a.m. (sharp) until 12:00 Noon
Location: Synopsys
455 North Mary Avenue, Building 2
Sunnyvale, California
The summit is free and open to the public. But, due to limited space,
RESERVATIONS ARE MANDATORY. Please confirm your attendance no later than
Wednesday, May 2 by 5:00 p.m., by phoning the Manufacturing Group Office at
408/501-7864 or by simply responding to this email.
If you have already made a reservation, there is no need to do so again. We
look forward to having you join us for this community-wide, public and
private sector summit to develop short-term solutions to our Valley and
State's energy crisis. Please come prepared to participate.
Sincerely,
Carl Guardino
- winmail.dat
=====================================
|
1,704 |
Subject: Re: Davis Press Conference 2/8
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/3143.
=====================================
hi jean: incidentally, you're coverage of the mess via email, etc. has been
unequaled. can't thank you enough. were there any materials giving more
specifics of what the governor proposed today?
thanks very much.
Best,
Jeff
Jean Munoz <[email protected]>
02/08/2001 03:09 PM
To: IEP <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Davis Press Conference 2/8
Governor Davis held a press conference earlier today at the Calpine Sutter
Power Plant project where he unveiled his plan to increase generating
capacity by boosting output at existing power facilities, accelerating power
plant construction, streamlining the review process for new facilities, and
providing incentives for distributed and renewable generation.
In addition, Governor Davis appointed Larry Hamlin of Fountain Valley as
California's energy construction czar. Mr. Hamlin is on a leave of absence
from Southern California Edison where he serves as Vice President of Power
Production and Operations and Maintenance Services.
IEP is releasing a statement in response which I will forward shortly.
Thanks,
Jean
----
Jean Munoz
McNally Temple Associates, Inc.
916-447-8186
916-447-6326 (fx)
- 8
=====================================
|
1,705 |
Subject: FW: Steve Peace Video Tape Update
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/1959.
=====================================
I'm slow in going through email... here's an update
---------------------- Forwarded by Karen Denne/Corp/Enron on 11/27/2000
04:41 PM ---------------------------
"sandra" <[email protected]> on 11/22/2000 01:54:49 PM
Please respond to "Sandra Yamane" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
cc: [email protected]
Subject: FW: Steve Peace Video Tape Update
Steve Peace's office called Bob Hertzberg's office back this morning and
told them that the video was incomplete and that they would send the tape as
soon as they finish making changes.
We are still trying to get a copy of the tape. Our friends in the Speaker's
office will call Sen. Peace's Sacramento office today and try to get a copy
from the Sacramento staff.
-----Original Message-----
From: sandra [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2000 9:50 AM
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: Steve Peace Video Tape
Karen:
Our friends in the Speaker's office have requested for a copy of the Steve
Peace tape. Mr. Peace's office is supposed to send a copy to the Speaker's
office next week. We will Fed-Ex a copy to you as soon as we receive it.
Happy Thanksgiving.
Sandra
=====================================
|
1,706 |
Subject: Computing Services OUTAGE for Sunday, June 24th
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/28045.
=====================================
Dear Haas Community,
Sunday, June 24th, 2001, between 8:00 AM and noon, several servers will
be shut down for maintenance, for upgrade of the server control switch, and
to relocate some servers in preparation for summer server upgrades.
The email/web server, haas, will be shut down and restarted, making email
service and the Haas main web site unavailable for about an hour. Also,
one of the servers required for web mail will be moved, taking the pilot
web mail service off-line for about an hour. In addition, the old research
server, grady, and the new research file server, bear, will be shutdown
and restarted during the outage period.
During the outage email will be held for later delivery. No email will be
lost.
As always, should you experience any problems with computing services
following the maintenance, please contact the information desk in the
Computer Center, or helpdesk at http://helpdesk.haas.berkeley.edu, phone
510/642-0434. Please note that Helpdesk is not manned on
weekends. Requests for help logged during the weekend will be responded to
Monday morning.
Your patience is greatly appreciated.
Thank you.
-----------------------
Haas Computing Services
=====================================
|
1,707 |
Subject: Re[2]: AHP Case
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/9415.
=====================================
Mark:
I agree that you should use an appropriate discount rate to discount a set
of cash flows. The cash flows in the case of a tax shield are not risky
and therefore they need to be discounted by the riskless rate. The only
risk of not obtaining the monies generated by the shield are that the
government would repeal the interest rate deduction or that AHP will not
have income to shield. Given the financial state of the company neither
are likely. That is why I used the riskless rate to discount.
If you guys disagree with my analysis feel free to change it. You would
need to multiply the number I provided by .357 to come up with the new number.
Dylan
At 08:55 AM 26-02-01 -0500, Mark Guinney wrote:
>Dylan,
>
>You shouldn't use a riskless rate not because of risk of the tax shield but
by
>leveraging up the risk of the firm increases, i.e. default risk/bankruptcy
>risk.
> A more appropriate rate should be the rate on the debt as determined by the
>market.
>
>**********************************************
>Mark D. Guinney, CFA
>Consultant
>Watson Wyatt Investment Consulting
>345 California Street, Ste. 1400
>San Francisco, CA 94104
>(415) 733-4487 ph.
>(415) 733-4190 fax
=====================================
|
1,708 |
Subject: Re: Legal Analysis on AB 1890
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/652.
=====================================
I think it's fuzzy enough that two good lawyers could give two different
views--wanted to ensure that all analytic bases are covered. But I just
talked to Mike and he and I think, at least preliminarily, that the PUC could
do this absent legislation. He's going to do the analysis. Likely better to
let Mike go ahead and do the analysis and if we want to get other opinions,
we can make that decision at that time.
One last thought: If the PUC could do it, that might be Davis' preference.
That way, he and his people are in charge. But it may be difficult
(impossible) for the Legsilature to resist and Davis may not have the clout
to get them to back off.
Steven J Kean
10/13/2000 11:06 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: Legal Analysis on AB 1890
What do you think he'll add?
Jeff Dasovich
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
10/13/2000 11:01 AM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Legal Analysis on AB 1890
I think it would be a good idea to have Ron Carroll in Watkiss' shop to do a
parallel analysis to what we're going to have Mike Day do. Ron's very good
and has done much work on these sortrs of issues. You comfortable with that?
=====================================
|
1,709 |
Subject: Negative CTC Complaint
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/10493.
=====================================
FYI.
---------------------- Forwarded by Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES on 03/29/2001 02:43
PM ---------------------------
From: Robert C Williams/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/29/2001 01:51 PM
To: Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Richard B
Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Negative CTC Complaint
As a result of the CPUC's chastisement of UDCs for not suing generators and
marketers at the recent hearings, SoCal Edison is unwilling to join in a
request for a stay of the Negative CTC proceeding (in which, as you know, it
has filed an "abuse of market power" counterclaim against EES). EES and PG&E
alone will not be able to convince the ALJ to stay the proceedings. This
means we will not be able to continue the proceeding. As a reminder, the
Negative CTC proceeding is on a separate, and faster, track than the "abuse
of market power" counterclaim. The hearing in the Negative CTC proceeding is
scheduled for late April. No procedural schedule for the "abuse of market
power" counterclaim has been established. If our motion to dismiss the
Counterclaim is granted, it will end. If not, the ALJ will enter a separate
procedural schedule.
Please call me with any questions.
=====================================
|
1,710 |
Subject: Re: Please forward to the group
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/1058.
=====================================
woops - i'm on a 4:45pm EST call so it'll probably be around 2:15 or 2:30
your time. thanks.
lara
Jeff Dasovich
09/05/2000 02:31 PM
To: Lara Leibman/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Please forward to the group
Here it is. And I have JUST been informed that I have to be on a conference
call tomorrow from 1-2. Could we do our call at noon or 2 pm California
time? Sorry for the inconvenience.
Best,
Jeff
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES on 09/05/2000 02:30
PM ---------------------------
Tracy Cooper@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
09/01/2000 05:56 PM
To: Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Please forward to the group
Rich and Jeff -- I apologize -- I left you off the original distribution that
I sent about an hour and a half ago --
Thanks!
Tracy J. Cooper
Please note my name has changed from McLaughlin to Cooper
Enron Broadband Services
Government Affairs
(503) 886-0396
----- Forwarded by Tracy Cooper/Enron Communications on 09/01/00 04:00 PM
-----
Scott Bolton
09/01/00 11:03 AM
To: Tracy Cooper/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
cc:
Subject: Please forward to the group
call me first thanks
=====================================
|
1,711 |
Subject: nan
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/3305.
=====================================
FYI.
December 2000
HEADLINE: "Perfection in California"
AUTHOR: Wilfred Wong
SUMMARY:
Recommended:
1997 Opus One Napa Valley Red Wine (100) -- Could the 1997 Opus One be that
elusive wine that one never finds? In my continual pursuit for wine nirvana,
I have traveled to Bordeaux and back with stops in Italy and Australia and
for what? Besides losing my luggage, tracking through customs and using
non-functional phone cards, I have been searching for that wine of
perfection. Could this wine finally be the one? This just released Opus One
may be the absolute finest young red wine I have ever tasted in a bottle
(barrel samples don't count). Aristocratically structured the 1997 Opus One
magnificently perfumes the air with aromas of ripe, succulent fruit,
fragrant, sweet earth and delicate, white flowers. Persistent to the point of
perfection, this wine does not allow its captive audience to escape its web
of Cabernet ecstasy. Made with the five important varietals of Bordeaux (82%
Cabernet Sauvignon, 8% Cabernet Franc, 5% Merlot, 4% Malbec, and 1% Petit
Verdot), this spellbinding wine commands attention. This is my top wine of
the year. (Best Served 2002-2018). ($130)
=====================================
|
1,712 |
Subject: Graduation in Tahoe
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/923.
=====================================
The semester is coming to a close and most of us are graduating. A group of us are celebrating with a three-day weekend in a house on Lake Tahoe, Dec 14 - 16. All are welcome to come, including families, significant others, and other students whose e-mail address I don't have.
What do you need to do?
Find other students that are interest in going (I know Florian and Anil are looking for housemates)
Find a house or lodging for the 2-3 nights
Let me know where you are staying and I will create a list and distribute so we can all connect up there.
If you want to stay in the vicinity, our house is located at:
Petrick House
Lakeview
3170 Meadowbrook Drive
Tahoe City, CA
Sorry we can't fit you all in our house, but you should be able to find something on the web. Try www.enjoytahoe.com.
Please forward to others that may be interested, and hope to see you up there!
-Jackie
Jacqueline Kelly
Treasury
Charles Schwab & Co, Inc
(415) 667-3915
Warning: All e-mail sent to or from this address will be received or otherwise
recorded by the Charles Schwab corporate e-mail system and is subject to
archival, monitoring or review by, and/or disclosure to, someone other than the
recipient.
=====================================
|
1,713 |
Subject: Re: Strategic Planning Director
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/5701.
=====================================
Indeed - I have thought of you SO much. Actually, if you can get a hold of
a copy of last weeks Economist, they have pretty much put their finger on
the situation. I am well, and I'd love to see you and debrief. Check your
calendar and let me know what lunch/morning tea might work for you next
week. Monday's are always bad, and any time after 2:30 is bad. Week after
next is pretty good too. I hope you are doing something creative and non
political at Enron. (I was NOT surprised when Ken Lay appeared as "Bush's
energy spokesman" before what's his name was confirmed...) Let me know what
works.... G. (and yes, rereading your note, I will give you a call. Too
much rushing around today, but perhaps tomorrow.....)
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
To: Gigi Coe <[email protected]>
Date: Thursday, January 18, 2001 9:54 AM
Subject: Re: Strategic Planning Director
>
>you're alive. thank god. i was wondering. be great if you would call
>some time so that we could guffaw about all of this. it is rich. very
>rich. 415.782.7822. hope that you and yours are well.
>
>that should have listened to us. (hee hee)
>
>best,
>jeff
>
>
=====================================
|
1,714 |
Subject: Re: Steve's testimony
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/1258.
=====================================
Jeff - Cynthia will be sending over the required 75 hard copies as well as
the electronic copy to the Committee this afternoon. The hearing is
scheduled from 9:00 to 2:00.
Jeff Dasovich@EES
09/08/2000 12:54 PM
To: Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON, [email protected], Maureen
McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, Elizabeth Linnell/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: Steve's testimony
I do plan on accompanying Steve. Steve, you want me to bring the copies. Be
glad to. What time does the party start?
Cynthia Sandherr@ENRON
09/08/2000 12:38 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Steve's testimony
Jeff: will you accompany Steve? If so, the Committee needs you to bring at
least 75 copies of the attached testimony with you to give to the Committee
Clerk to "satisfy the anticipatied public interest." I would suggest you
bring more.....
---------------------- Forwarded by Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron on 09/08/2000
01:45 PM ---------------------------
Elizabeth Linnell
09/08/2000 12:44 PM
Sent by: Elizabeth Linnell
To: Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES
cc: Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Steve's testimony
Attached is the final version.
=====================================
|
1,715 |
Subject: Webvan Discount for Classmates
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/personal/24.
=====================================
Classmates - I asked our VP of Marketing if there was anything I could give
to the people I go to school with for the Holidays and to help them get
through finals. He said no to the 20 lb. turkey but suggested I send this
gift certificate instead.
Enjoy!
- Blake
____________________________________________________
Webvan is the first full-service online grocery and drugstore. At
Webvan you'll find everything you need to make this holiday
season festive and fun. Shop now at http://www.webvan.com.
OUR HOLIDAY GIFT TO YOU
Enjoy $15 savings when you place your first Webvan order of $100 or
more this holiday season. Simply print and present this email or the
promotion code (yr99.ftc) to your Webvan Courier at the time of delivery
and you will receive $15 off your first order. Valid for any delivery
scheduled
on or before December 31, 1999.*
FREE DELIVERY!
When you order by December 31, 1999, we will waive the delivery fee.
Shop early for the best selection. To visit Webvan, just click below:
http://www.webvan.com.
----
* One coupon per order, valid for any order placed with a delivery
date scheduled on or before 12/31/99. Coupon not applicable for
tobacco or fluid dairy products.
=====================================
|
1,716 |
Subject: It's Zoomerang Time!
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/5626.
=====================================
We would like to know your opinions on a hot, new event coming to Haas! Your
input will help make the Haas Asia Business Conference a success. Thank you
in advance for your participation and feedback.
Go to: http://www.zoomerang.com/survey.zgi?7GJ72G8W3Q46TXWA8XP438A2
Please click this link now (or go online and retype the address into your Web
browser). If you do not want to take this or other surveys, please click
"reply" and
ask the survey creator to remove you from the email list.
Zoomerang is a survey clearinghouse. We do not censor the questions or
messages in the surveys or the invitations to take surveys that third
parties may propound, nor do we censor the responses you may provide. The
sender of a survey is solely responsible for the subject matter and contents
of the survey invitation and survey in which you participate, and you are
solely responsible for the contents of your response.
According to Zoomerang's Terms of Agreement,
<http://www.zoomerang.com/terms.html> survey senders
promise that they have an ongoing business or personal relationship or
they've obtained
consent to send emails to survey recipients. Please send questions to
[email protected].
=====================================
|
1,717 |
Subject: Revised Draft Briefing Outline
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/27872.
=====================================
Good evening all:
Attached are (1) a revised clean draft of our ongoing briefing outline and
(2) a redlined version of the outline.? A few notes:
I have not yet prepared Appendix A, the definition of Net Undercollected
Amount.? It would be useful for Ann to make sure that the defined term in the
MOU still works in this context.? Ann, would you please put together the
Appendix for inclusion?
Jeff Dasovich has committed to providing a criterion for determining when the
retail market is viable.? This is a very important issue both to large
customers and, I would assume, to ESPs.? We look forward to hearing from Jeff
on Monday on this point.
We have no new information from the "coming and going" subcommittee, but look
forward to including that information when available.
Customers (perhaps both large and small) would be well served to get together
to talk about the Interim Rate Relief section.? I'm not sure whether I've
fairly captured the discussions (or whether the discussions were clear enough
to capture).? At a minimum, this effort should move us one step closer to
identifying the competing proposals.
Enjoy your weekend!
- Draft Issues Outline 061401 (redline).doc
=====================================
|
1,718 |
Subject: Berkeley Entrepreneurs Forum, August 31
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/1915.
=====================================
UC Berkeley Entrepreneurs Forum
Thursday, November 30, 2000
6:30 PM
Haas School of Business
Andersen Auditorium
__________________________________________________________________
Topic:??????????Bricks to Clicks in the new Internet Reality: How to Shorten
the Path to Profitability
Speaker: ???????Dan Beldy, Partner, Hummer Winblad Venture Partners,
????????????????Brian Dunning and Todd Dunning, co-founders, Buylink Inc.
Learn more about how leading venture capital firms choose their investments
and how those firms position themselves to attract such investment.
Registration: There are special rates for faculty and staff.
Note registration procedure for students:
a) in person with cash or check in room F450, weekdays 9AM to 4PM.
b) with Mastercard/Visa over the phone, please call (510) 642 4255
The fee for pre- registration is $5. There will be a $10 registration fee at
the door. Note: On-site registration is subject to space available. Pre-
registration for students and staff closes at 4PM on Tuesday, November 28 or
earlier if it is sold out.
Information:
For more information on the series, please visit our Website at
http://www.haas.berkeley.edu/~lester/bef.html
=====================================
|
1,719 |
Subject: Re: California Legislation Info
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/9218.
=====================================
Scott Govenar, our outside lobbyist, (916.448.8240) and Mike Day, our
outside counsel, might also be useful resources for you, John.
Best,
Jeff
John Neslage@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
02/16/2001 03:44 PM
To: Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON
Subject: California Legislation Info
Hey Leslie:
Sandi McCubbin told me that I should consult with you. I am compiling
information on legislation being considered in California as a result of the
electrcity crisis for two main purposes. First, I need it for Steve Kean's
briefing book as he is scheduled to meet with a federal legislative panel in
California (Tauzin and Barton, +6 other Congressmen) on Wednesday, and
second, I am going to compile info on emergency legislation and CPUC
proceedings in a central place for knowledge management purposes.
Can you email me whatever information you may have on California
legislation? I would greatly appreciate it. I will also give you a call to
follow up. Steve's leaving on Tuesday at Noon, so I need to get info
together well before then.
Thanks
John
=====================================
|
1,720 |
Subject: RE: California Meeting
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['Patricia; Rivas', '[email protected]', 'Mariaelena; Cooley', 'Linda J.; Chapman', "O'Neal", 'Sharon; Smith', 'Paulett; Noske', 'Jan; Dick', '[email protected]', 'Kay']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/1286.
=====================================
I can be on. You want me to join? Just let me know. You can call me on my cell phone 415.505.6633.
Best,
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Steffes, James D.
Sent: Thu 10/11/2001 8:04 AM
To: Dasovich, Jeff; Mara, Susan
Cc:
Subject: FW: California Meeting
FYI. Probably too early for you guys.
Jim
-----Original Message-----
From: Dodgen, Kathy
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 8:01 AM
To: Delainey, David; Dietrich, Janet; Sharp, Vicki; Smith, Mike; Wu, Andrew; [email protected]; Blachman, Jeremy; Frazier, Lamar; Holmes, Sean; Steffes, James D.
Cc: O'Neal, Patricia; Rivas, Mariaelena; Cooley, Jan; Dick, Sharon; Smith, Paulett; Noske, Linda J.; Chapman, Kay
Subject: California Meeting
A California meeting is scheduled for Thursday, October 11 at 9 a.m. For those who need to dial in, the no. is as follows:
1-800-991-9019; passcode: 7827970
EB872 is reserved for this meeting.
Jim Steffes - if there is anyone else who you feel needs to be in this meeting, please feel free to invite.
Attendees:
Dave Delainey
Janet Dietrich
Vicki Sharp
Mike Smith
Andy Wu
Bob Williams
Jeremy Blachman
Lamar Frazier
Sean Holmes
Jim Steffes
=====================================
|
1,721 |
Subject: A.00-11-038 - SCE Testimony -- Implementation of CPA
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/9391.
=====================================
Attached is SCE's proposal for implementation of the California Procurement
Adjustment under ABX-1. I will be sending SDG&E's and PG&E's under separate
e-mail.
Please review carefully each carefully. Specifically note the SCE's and
PG&E's provisions for dealing with the direct access credit. The ALJ Ruling
in this proceeding states that parties may serve modifications the UDCs'
proposals on February 28th (or put in their own proposal for a CPA). The
ruling the provides for parties to "serve comments on any of the proposals
for a CPA" on March 5th. Bottom line is I think we can get away with not
commenting until the 5th. In either case, there is not a lot of time, so
please get me any thoughts/comments concerns as soon as possible.
Jeanne Bennett
Subject: A.00-11-038 - SCE Testimony
To All Parties of Record in A.00-11-038:
Attached is a copy of Southern California Edison Company's Testimony in
Compliance with the ALJ's Procedural Schedule. This testimony is also being
served today, February 23, 2001, via U.S. mail.
(See attached file: letter.pdf)(See attached file: Testimony.pdf)(See
attached file: CPABA_Proposed.pdf)
- letter.pdf
- Testimony.pdf
- CPABA_Proposed.pdf
=====================================
|
1,722 |
Subject: Re: HELP -- CEO email
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron@Enron', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/3077.
=====================================
here's my "version":
From: Jeff Dasovich on 05/22/2001 10:53 AM CDT
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: HELP -- CEO email
I'll have Joseph clean up the letter and send you the email/fax #'s etc. for
the list, for the cards that I gathered.
Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 05/22/2001 10:51 AM -----
Karen Denne
05/22/2001 12:45 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: HELP -- CEO email
Jeff -- Thanks for your phone message. I'm stuck and need your help. My
Microsoft Word isn't working, and I want to send something out to the ceos
asap tuesday. Can you clean up the letter? I'm fine w/ your edits (for the
signature line, add "name, title") Pls send me the final letter so I can
detach. i've left a message for steve and will wait to send until i hear
from him.
I'm didn't collect biz cards from everyone at the CEO meetings, and I need
email and/or fax numbers for:
Tony Ridder
Steve Kirsch
Ken Oshman
Fred Anderson
Dan Scheinman
Vivek Ranadive
John Doerr
Ray Irani
Can you send me the info from their cards? Call me if you have any
questions. THANK YOU!!!
kd
=====================================
|
1,723 |
Subject: UDC Testimony on Retained Generation
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/28145.
=====================================
Pursuant to the June 15th Ruling of ALJ DeUlloa, the UDCs filed testimony on
the revenue requirements for their retained generation and associated
ratemaking mechanisms. Attached is a brief summary of each of the UDCs'
proposals. Rebuttal testimony is due next Monday the 2nd. A prehearing
conference is scheduled for the 5th, with the hearing to begin on the 9th.
In a related matter, both SCE and PG&E filed motions to include as part of
the scope of the proceeding, the issue of the implementation and allocation
of DWR's revenue requirement. Specifically the UDCs believe the Commission
needs to (1) ensure that DWR's revenue requirement recovery does not
jeopardize recovery of the Commission determined URG revenue requirement (2)
the allocation of the revenue requirement among the investor owned
utilities; and (3) the allocation of the revenue requirement amount the
customers of each utility once the inter-utility allocation is completed.
The ALJ has not yet ruled on whether these issues will become part of the
proceeding.
Please review the attached summary. We need to determine as soon as
possible if we plan to participate in this proceeding.
Jeanne
<<X25702.DOC>>
- X25702.DOC
=====================================
|
1,724 |
Subject: Follow Up on Payment for Power Delivered to Curtailed Load
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/4564.
=====================================
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 12/12/2000 11:02 AM -----
Alan Comnes@ECT
12/06/2000 03:44 PM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Follow Up on Payment for Power Delivered to Curtailed Load
Jeff,
Please pass this note onto whomever on the call asked the question "what
would Enron be paid if there was an electricity curtailment?"
I talked with staff on the West Desk and confirmed that if there is an
unscheduled electricity curtailment (i.e., rolling or widespread blackout)
power scheduled by EES to a retail customer would still flow, assuming it had
been prescheduled. EPMI (acting as EES's scheduling coordinator, or SC)
would be paid the ISO decremental (dec) price for that power. EPMI would
pass that revenue (along with the cost of supplying that power) onto EES.
If the blackout continued for some time (i.e., days), presumably EES would
adjust its preschedule and there would be no net sales into the ISO.
Whether the retail customer gets a payment for being curtailed depends
completely on the contract between EES and the customer. Presumably the
force majure provisions of the contract would protect EES from utility
blackouts.
Alan Comnes
=====================================
|
1,725 |
Subject: Re:
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/9903.
=====================================
Apologies, if I had your phone number, I'd have called you. I'm tied up for
the next hour or so. If you give me your number, I can call you.
Best,
Jeff
"JOHN G KLAUBERG" <[email protected]>
03/13/2001 02:26 PM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Re:
Jeff: I received your message but have been jammed up on a long call. I
will try to get you in about an hour if that is ok. Thanks John
"This e-mail, including attachments, contains information that is
confidential and it may be protected by the attorney/client or other
privileges. This e-mail, including attachments, constitutes non-public
information intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If
you are not an intended recipient, please delete this e-mail, including
attachments and notify me by return mail, e-mail or by phone at 212
424-8125. The unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction
of the e-mail, including attachments, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
John Klauberg
LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae, L.L.P.
212 424-8125
[email protected]
>>> <[email protected]> 03/13/01 01:56PM >>>
greetings. could you please call me at 415.782.7822. thanks.
Jeff
=====================================
|
1,726 |
Subject: Missed Ya
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/1872.
=====================================
Hey. Work prevented me from going to class at all last nite. Does the course seem like it will be good? Were there a million people there? Chances are very low that I'll get in, but I'm gonna try anyway. I'm on vacation next week (yeah), but maybe we can catch during the break on the following Tuesday or Wednesday. Good to see you the other night. Take care.
Best,
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Courtney Abernathy [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 12:51 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich
Subject: Stranger
Hey there!
How are you? How's your summer? I'm nearing the end
of summer school and cannot wait til it's over. The
class has been a new low point in terms of educational
value-it sucks! ...in fact, I'm in class now.
Work is fine-not thrilling. Again-I'm thinking about
taking advantage of Sun's flexible work deal and
moving back up to the city. I do not like the south
bay much.
Trying to get a happy hour together in August...are
you around?
Let me know how you are...
Courtney
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/
=====================================
|
1,727 |
Subject: RE: Overpaid CA UUT Refund Notice
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/311.
=====================================
Haven't heard anything about it, though Sue's been closer to these issues.
-----Original Message-----
From: Smith, Mike
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 10:58 AM
To: [email protected]; Dasovich, Jeff; Mara, Susan
Subject: Overpaid CA UUT Refund Notice
Do you know anything about this? Can you offer any insights?
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike D Smith/HOU/EES on 09/27/2001 10:57 AM ---------------------------
Jeffrey K Fischer
09/26/2001 02:38 PM
To: Diann Huddleson/HOU/EES@EES, Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Ronald Adzgery/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Overpaid CA UUT Refund Notice
Diann and Mike,
Attached is a notice we propose sending to our customers that were overcharged UUT as a result of PG&E's billing practices. Because of the UUT refund statute of limitations, the sooner the notices are sent the fewer refund dollars our customers will lose.
Please let me know if you would like to discuss the notice further or if it is acceptable for sending with the spreadsheets that Diann's group is putting together showing the amount of the potentially overpaid UUT.
Thanks,
Jeff
<< File: Customer Notice of UUT Refund.doc >>
<Embedded Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)>
=====================================
|
1,728 |
Subject: Weekend efforts to translate core/noncore proposal into legislative
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/11889.
=====================================
Below is an update from the weekend's activities.
The group negotiating the core/noncore proposal met over the weekend to
attempt to put the proposal into legislative language/format.
The product produced thus far is generally sloppy and ill-drafted and the
individual facilitating the group is working tonite to integrate the comments
provided and discussions that took place today. He will distribute a new
draft by noon tomorrow (PDT).
The plan as it currently stands is to deliver a product to Hertzberg by COB
tomorrow (Monday).
As expected, some in the group are attempting to "recontract" certain
portions of the original deal, but those attempts are generally at the margin.
The DWR contracts remain a key impediment to any deal.
Senator Burton has still not definitively committed to a conference committee
to produce a bill to deliver to Davis.
In addition, the legislation to create a dedicated rate component to service
the bonds to repay the state budget for power purchased by DWR (and de-link
the bonds from the DWR contracts) may be on a slower track than folks thought
initially.
Will have more information tomorrow on where Burton and the bond legislation
stand.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
1,729 |
Subject: Re: Regulatory / Commercial Focus Q3/Q4 2001
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/28833.
=====================================
Sounds good. You can reach me at 415.782.7822. Because my schedule is a
mess (thanks to the mess California has created), if you don't reach me on my
office line, please try 415.505.6633. Also, I think that it would be very
useful to have Leslie Lawner on, since she's involved a lot in California gas
matters, but it's your call. Just let me know.
Best,
Jeff
Barry Tycholiz/ENRON@enronXgate
07/17/2001 08:30 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Stephanie Miller/ENRON@enronXgate, Jane M
Tholt/ENRON@enronXgate, Mike Grigsby/ENRON@enronXgate
cc: Jessica Presas/ENRON@enronXgate
Subject: Regulatory / Commercial Focus Q3/Q4 2001
Jeff, for the meeting on Thurs a.m. 9:30 ( Houston Time ), we should keep
our group to the list I have identified. I would like to start with a simple
plan and work out from there. We are working towards an action plan for
handling PUC issues ( from a commercial perspective) in california and other
states, prior to anybody addressing the PUC we need agreement as to what it
is we want to put forward.
We will call you on thurs a.m. Can you please verify your contact phone
number.
Thanks in advance.
Jessica, pls reserve a room.
BT
=====================================
|
1,730 |
Subject: Will Surcharges Be Applied to Direct Access?
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/12834.
=====================================
The commercial teams at EES need to understand our opinion / perspective on=
=20
if Direct Access customers in the future will pay any surcharges. Also, w=
ho=20
can we contact in CPUC and legislature or governor office to verify?
To make this make sense, I think that we need to think about this on a=20
"revenue item" basis (eg, Utility Undercollection from x date to y date).
Why not discuss on CA call tomorrow?
Jim
Some notes from Order ---
The surcharge adopted in D. 01-03-082 is intended to provide payment for DW=
R=20
purchases which do not include purchases made by direct access customers. =
By=20
this exemption we intend to =01&net out=018 the charges and credits of dire=
ct=20
access customers. =20
1. Direct access customers do not impose liabilities on CDWR, PG&E or Ediso=
n=20
for procuring power.
It would be inequitable for direct access customers to pay for their own co=
st=20
of procurement and a share of the costs incurred on behalf of customers who=
=20
purchase power from PG&E, Edison and CDWR.
1. The credit that direct access customers receive shall not reflect the=20
surcharges imposed on others by today=01,s decision, which direct access=20
customers do not pay.
=====================================
|
1,731 |
Subject: Agenda for energy committee meeting
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/27765.
=====================================
Energy Committee Members:
Please find the agenda for tomorrow's committee meeting attached along with
the minutes from our last meeting. Remember, we will be hosted by Siemens
at 4900 Old Ironside Drive in Santa Clara. As discussed at our last
meeting, please be prepared with nominations for a new co-chair of the
energy committee. Below are preliminay criterion that Justin and I
established in deciding who to vote on as committee co-chair. We will
discuss the criteria at tomorrow's meeting and will ammend and finalize as
decided by committee members. Please review and be prepared with
suggestions. Also, please be prepared to discuss the Real Time Pricing
Tariff language as we are expected to submit comments to the CEC on
Wednesday. Thanks and see you tomorrow. Laura
***********************************
Preliminary Criteria:
Energy Knowledge
-technical
-policy
Communication / Persuasion Skills
Leadership Ability / Skills
Commitment to Overall SVMG Goals
Alignment with SVMG Goals
Familiarity with SVMG Membership Base
Stature of
-Organization
-Position
Good Chemistry
Intangibles
- Energy Committee Agenda June 12.doc
- Energy Committee Meeting Minutes June 6.doc
=====================================
|
1,732 |
Subject: Re: California credit issues
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/7902.
=====================================
Check out WSJ- Page A2. Also,Bill Bradford in Rick buy's group is person
most proficient on credit issues relative to the three calif. utilities. I
will also get back to you this afternoon........The CPUC is scheduled to
issue orders today at 12:00 CST that may dramatically affect credit ratings
of the 3 utilities.
Mark Schroeder@ECT
12/21/2000 08:13 AM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Bryan Seyfried/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: California credit issues
Rick/Jeff - I just spoke with John Sherriff and mentioned to him how on top
of California you guys were. As you may be aware, we are making markets in
the credit of many utilities and telcomm companies, via EnronCredit.com.
Brian Seyfried is the commercial leader for this business. John has asked me
to ask you, if you become aware of significant developments, in the public
sector (not privileged/insider information), bearing on
creditworthiness/ability to pay by California utilities, would you please
keep us informed, as we will have a keen interest in these developments?
Please forward to this to any others on your team(s) you think appropriate.
thanks mcs
=====================================
|
1,733 |
Subject: Re: California in the Dark - CERA Alert
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/10175.
=====================================
Joan - Can we add Jeff?
----- Forwarded by Elizabeth Linnell/NA/Enron on 03/20/01 03:38 PM -----
Jeff Dasovich
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
03/20/01 09:59 AM
To: Lora Sullivan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron, Elizabeth
Linnell/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: California in the Dark - CERA Alert
Is it possible to get a login ID and password to get into the CERA site?
Best,
Jeff
Lora Sullivan
03/20/2001 07:46 AM
To: Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tom Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: California in the Dark - CERA Alert
Title: California in the Dark
URL: http://www20.cera.com/eprofile?u=35&m=2302
In a recent Washington Post op-ed piece, Dan Yergin and Larry Makovich
discuss the continued mess of California's electric power problems. Rather
than fixing the flaws, the current policies from Sacramento are moving
California down the road to an expensive public power setup and higher prices
for consumers and businesses. And the shortage is going to get worse this
summer.
**end**
Follow above URL for full report.
E-mail Category: Alert
CERA Knowledge Area(s): Global Energy,
=====================================
|
1,734 |
Subject: Re: Weekly West Update 11/29/00
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/4346.
=====================================
Thanks Mary. I'll keep checking for the agenda and will update accordingly
unless I hear otherwise.
Marcie
Mary Hain@ECT
12/06/2000 10:42 AM
To: Marcie Milner/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Mona L
Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Weekly West Update 11/29/00
Given the importance of this document to the traders and given that the FERC
may be considering a number of these dockets at its December 13th meeting and
given that the agenda for that meeting has not yet been posted, I would wait
until the agenda is posted to update and forward to the traders. The FERC's
agenda is posted at:
www.ferc.fec.us/public/isd/sunshine/htm
From: Marcie Milner@ENRON on 11/29/2000 03:15 PM CST
To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Mona L
Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Weekly West Update 11/29/00
=====================================
|
1,735 |
Subject: Please review in preparation for energy committee meeting
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/11164.
=====================================
Please review the following information regarding real time pricing to
prepare for this afternoon's energy committee meeting - per Barbara
Barkovich.
From: "Chester Hong" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
Subject: A.00-11-038 TESTIMONY OF MICHAEL R. JASKE CALIFORNIA
ENERGYCOMMISSION REGARDING RATE DESIGN
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001 14:50:23 -0700
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_009C_01C0C679.13CFC5A0"
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 5.5.3.1
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
?
Attached in WORD 97 is the TESTIMONY OF MICHAEL R. JAKSKE CALIFORNIA ENERGY
COMMISSION REGARDING RATE If you have
any problems opening this document, please contact me at (916) 654-3951.?
All other questions/e-mails should be addressed to?Jennifer Tachera.
?
California Energy Commission
Chief Counsel's Office
Staff Counsel?Jennifer Tachera
1516 9th Street
Sacramento, CA.? 95814
E-mail address:? Jtachera@energy .state.ca.us
Phone Number:? (916) 654-3870
- CEC Testimony on Rate Design.doc
- PUC cover letter.doc
=====================================
|
1,736 |
Subject: Legislative Term Sheet Proposal
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/3456.
=====================================
Kevin,
Pursuant to your request for a term sheet that would propose legislation to
enable broadband access for every home and business in an attempt to bridge
the digital divide, please see the attached document below. The term sheet
incorporates several federal solutions to funding a fiber or DSL build-out
that will support high speed connectivity for residential and business
premises, including a "take-back" of HDTV spectrum and subsequent auction
thereof, as well as the establishment of individual tax credits or a
"Broadband Buildout and Internet Access Trust Fund."
While the term sheet describes different opportunities for the government to
endorse the build-out of last mile infrastructure, the federal solutions set
forth do not have a high probability of enactment by the next congress.
Thus, we are identifying additional means of promoting broadband access
through state and municipal governments, as well as private initiatives. We
will forward a supplemental document to you in the coming weeks that
describes additional avenues. Perhaps we could meet at that time to discuss
the full array of options.
I look forward to hearing your thoughts or comments.
Regards,
Lara
=====================================
|
1,737 |
Subject: RE: Meeting Saturday
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/402.
=====================================
Ford initial spreadsheet information from our conference last Tuesday.
Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: Jacqueline Kelly [SMTP:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2000 12:04 PM
To: Aaron Mednelson (E-mail); Alyson Huey (E-mail); Chris Sklarin (E-mail);
Chris_Neale (E-mail); Chrystine Lee (E-mail); CLangridge (E-mail); Deepika
Shah (E-mail); Jacqueline Kelly; NHTurner (E-mail); Paul Brodie (E-mail);
Peter Devroede (E-mail); Ted Chin (E-mail); Thomas McVey (E-mail)
Cc: Aiaz Kazi (E-mail); Courtney Abernath (E-mail); Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)
Subject: Meeting Saturday
We will meet again on Saturday to continue our discussion on the Ford case
for marketing. If you were not at the first meeting and would like to come
on Saturday, please let me know. We propose sharing the work that we
accomplished yesterday, and asking the new comers to bring something to
contribute. Chrystine is working on some areas that could be assigned so
that we can cover as much material as possible with minimal overlap.
We were thinking of meeting at 10, and thought either Aaron or Jeff's
office
were viable.
Jeff, would your office work?
Let me know!
thanks,
Jackie
- e206 Ford calculations.xls
=====================================
|
1,738 |
Subject: American Antitrust Institute
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/23.
=====================================
Jeff,
By the time you return from vacation, I will be on vacation and only
returning on Sept. 5th. As a result, I thought it would be best to e-mail
this request to you.
Rick will be moderating a panel as part of an electricity roundtable
sponsored by the American Antitrust Institute on Sept. 7th in DC. His panel
concerns vertical market power issues related to wholesale and retail
electric markets; his panel consists of Nora Brownell, John Hangar and Bob
Fleishman. I would appreciate it if you would please suggest a few issues
and/or thought-provoking questions for Rick to consider when addressing his
panel. The following paragraph is a description of Rick's panel that
invitees to the roundtable received:
VERTICAL MARKET POWER ISSUES: Wholesaling and Retailing
This segment will examine possible abuses in and between wholesale and retail
markets; preferences afforded to investor-owned utilities and how those
preferences manifest themselves; regulatory, legislative and judicially
driven solutions; and the role of antitrust and regulators to remedy
discrimination in these markets.
Thank you in advance for your assistance. I hope you had a wonderful
vacation.
Regards,
Lara
=====================================
|
1,739 |
Subject: Re: Team Project for E-Biz Class
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/327.
=====================================
Jeff:
I think the only one you missed out is Anil Sama ([email protected]). I looked
at perfect.com and I'm game. Let's discuss our plan of action/logistics
during the break (Either tomorrow, or Saturday/Monday).
So what do we call our team? (I'm itching to say "Perfectionists!" How very
punny, GROAN!)
Aiaz
Incidentally, Joesph asked me about forming a group too and I told him that I
was waiting to hear from you...
--
On Wed, 2 Feb 2000 12:56:06 Jeff Dasovich wrote:
>
>
>Ok, I've already forgotten to whom I'm supposed to send this. (Joseph
approached
>me last nite, and I very reluctantly told him that I'd already joined a
group).
>
>Who are the other folks?
>
>The company's called perfect.com (go to their website). they're trying to
>develop the most groovy, wiz bang auction procurement functionality out
there,
>for businesses and consumers alike. they've got proven execs, muscular vc
>backing and some world-renowned standford phd. economists/auction theorists.
>talked to my friend yesterday (vp of biz development) and she thinks it
would be
>great. no problem with access, etc.
>
>let me know what you think.
>
>best,
>jeff
>
>
>
HotBot - Search smarter.
http://www.hotbot.com
=====================================
|
1,740 |
Subject: Re: Steve's testimony
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/321.
=====================================
Jeff: The hearing begins at 9:00 a.m. and should last until approximately
2:00 p.m., consist of two panels with Steve (at this point) on the first
panel (but this is subject to change.)
Jeff Dasovich@EES
09/08/2000 01:54 PM
To: Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON, [email protected], Maureen
McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, Elizabeth Linnell/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: Steve's testimony
I do plan on accompanying Steve. Steve, you want me to bring the copies. Be
glad to. What time does the party start?
Cynthia Sandherr@ENRON
09/08/2000 12:38 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Steve's testimony
Jeff: will you accompany Steve? If so, the Committee needs you to bring at
least 75 copies of the attached testimony with you to give to the Committee
Clerk to "satisfy the anticipatied public interest." I would suggest you
bring more.....
---------------------- Forwarded by Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron on 09/08/2000
01:45 PM ---------------------------
Elizabeth Linnell
09/08/2000 12:44 PM
Sent by: Elizabeth Linnell
To: Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES
cc: Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Steve's testimony
Attached is the final version.
=====================================
|
1,741 |
Subject: RE: Fielder Needs to Cancel Our Meeting
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/90.
=====================================
Sounds good. How about first thing tomorrow morning for a call?
-----Original Message-----
From: Etringer, Michael
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 4:48 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff; Parquet, David
Subject: RE: Fielder Needs to Cancel Our Meeting
I have been instructed by Chris C that we need to go to DWR, PG&E the state or whom ever will listen. I will start working on the all-in (PG&E/SCE) presentation!
When are you both available for a conference call.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 1:39 PM
To: Parquet, David; Calger, Christopher F.; Etringer, Michael
Subject: Fielder Needs to Cancel Our Meeting
Called Fielder to confirm and he said that he needed to cancel. As you know, the Legislature closed without doing anything with Edison's bailout legislation. The Governor has said that the will order them back into session in two weeks. That has Fielder and everyone else at Edison scrambling to continue their attempts to stay out of bankruptcy, which means that Fielder won't be focused, and can't focus on, anything else for the next couple of weeks. Let's regroup. Dave, perhaps we should just go ahead and start with PG&E. Thoughts?
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
1,742 |
Subject: Definition of Quasi-rent
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/mba_program/49.
=====================================
There are several potential definitions of quasirent in the economics
literature. I evidently have not used the one I should have in section.
So here is a definitive explanation of quasi-rent. You can also look in
Besanko on pages 153-154. Note that this definition does not change how
we should solve the problems. It is simply a definition. I apologize for
any sudden panic attacks this causes.
Quasi-rent should be considered as equal to your sunk costs. This is the
amount another business can hold you up for after your entry. If I have
to sink 5 million dollars to enter, my quasi-rent will be 5 million
dollars, which I may be held up for after I enter. Thus in solving
holdup problems, you can consider it two ways. 1. The potential holdup
amount is equal to the quasirent which equals the sunk cost at that point.
or 2. How much does a firm have to receive to continue to produce AFTER
sinking their sunk costs.
I hope this definition has cleared the haze which I am at least partially
responsible. Once again, the explanation of how to solve these problems
has always been correct. The strict definition of quasirents was not.
J. Lamar Pierce
Ph.D Student
Haas School of Business
UC Berkeley
=====================================
|
1,743 |
Subject: Evening MBA Corporate Sponsors Reception
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/211.
=====================================
Evening Students,
We're in the process of planning a new event for the fall semester: A
Corporate Sponsors Reception.
This event will be hosted by the Evening MBA Program. All evening students
will be invited and given two invitations to invite your manager and/or
your Human Resources/Benefits manager. The goal is to thank those people
who are helping to further your education, either by sponsoring your
tuition or just by providing the time and other resources that make working
full-time and studying part-time possible.
We have invited Dean Laura Tyson to be the keynote speaker. It is our goal
to have other Haas Faculty and Staff there as well.
The date will be Tuesday, October 2, 2001.
I need your opinion on the location, however. Would you prefer to have the
event in downtown San Francisco (close to public transit and more central
to most places of employment) -- or would you prefer to invite your
managers to visit the Haas School and see where you spend your
time? Please weigh in on the choice of venue. Thank you.
If you have any additional ideas or questions, please feel free to contact me.
Thank you very much for your time,
Meg
[email protected]
(510) 643-9742
=====================================
|
1,744 |
Subject: FW: SCE Negative CTC Claim
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/648.
=====================================
Any reason in particular that you're of this view? (I'm hoping you'll say that Edison's informed you that it might be doable.)
-----Original Message-----
From: Williams, Robert C.
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 3:31 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff; '[email protected]'; Mara, Susan; '[email protected]'; Steffes, James D.
Cc: Sharp, Vicki; Sanders, Richard B.
Subject: SCE Negative CTC Claim
Mike Day believes that SCE might agree to a new Stipulation in which they commit to pay our claim if their new deal and their pending Advice Letter are approved by the CPUC. I have scheduled a call for tomorrow at 12:30 CST to discuss the terms we would like to see in the Stipulation (e.g., drop approval of the Advice Letter as a condition, payment within 10 days after CPUC approval, agreement on the number set forth in our response to their Data Request, agreement to apply accrued negative CTC credits to current T&D charges, to name a few). On the other hand a delay in this proceeding is probably in our interest, in view of the SCE Counterclaim. Going this route would probably be in lieu of some of the other alternatives we discussed, so I believe we will need to get senior management't approval to any agreement.
=====================================
|
1,745 |
Subject: Re: ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE - CPUC Decision
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/28114.
=====================================
See attached -
As Mike Day has indicated, we are 99% sure the CPUC will bifurcate the PX
credit payment and DA suspension issues, and vote only on DA suspension on
Thursday. This gives more time to work on a SCE PX credit stipulation.
James D Steffes
06/24/2001 10:20 AM
To: Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron, Robert C
Williams/Enron@EnronXGate, [email protected]
cc: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE - CPUC Decision
Harry & Sue --
Please work with Mike Day on Monday am to develop the following -
1. Outline of a proposed SCE - Enron - WPTF Stipulation that resolves SCE's
request for suspension of payment of PX Credit.
2. Talking points for Jeff Skilling to call Bryson to discuss.
Get these to Skilling through Rick early Monday so that he can call.
Skilling is going to try and convince SCE to settle and not let the CPUC
decide this issue.
I know it's a long-shot on getting a deal done and before the CPUC on
Wednesday, but this may be our last best hope to hold this element of the
Proposed Decision.
Call me on Monday am to discuss (I'll be in DC).
Thanks,
Jim
=====================================
|
1,746 |
Subject: Re: Changes and Updates to SOLUTION
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/3888.
=====================================
Robert:
To answer Jim's question - the savings to CDWR are monthly, is that correct?
As we discussed, I will check in with you around 1Central to see if you have
the info. from Tamara. Also, I left a message for Jeff asking about the gas
infrastructure language.
Thanks, Jennifer
James D Steffes
04/27/01 12:19 AM
To: robert neusteadter, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Jennifer
Thome/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Changes and Updates to SOLUTION
Robert --
Pls take a look. We have some need for serious data inclusions and changes
from Tamara. I restructured the charts. Hope this makes sense.
I also don't understand the Direct Access Benefits to CDWR table - Are the
savings monthly, annually, total???
We need to add Jeff's section on Natural Gas.
Please everyone check out what I said about a California Demand Buy-Down
system that should be in place until Retail Rate structure is changed. Not
sure if everyone wants this much detail or if this contradicts anything else
we have put out.
The goal is to get this to Janel by 3pm Friday for her to include in a Draft
Package for Steve over the weekend with final revisions on Monday.
I appreciate everyone's help.
Thanks,
Jim
=====================================
|
1,747 |
Subject: Re: First Cut at High Tech Messages
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/388.
=====================================
I was holding back a bit. All I needed was the green light. I'll make it
explicit. Thanks for the comments.
I am very ready to start getting the word out.
Best,
Jeff
Steven J Kean
Sent by: Steven J Kean
09/26/2000 04:14 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: First Cut at High Tech Messages
Looks good. I think you implicitly say this, but I think you should make it
more explicit:
The continued growth of the new economy is threatened by our electricity
infrastructure more than anything else.
The high tech industry requires market driven solutions to reliability and
pricing not the old style command and control regulated monopoly approach.
Let's start getting the word out!
Jeff Dasovich
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
09/26/2000 02:06 PM
To: [email protected], Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Sue Nord/NA/Enron@Enron,
Margaret Carson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rob Bradley/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
[email protected], Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: First Cut at High Tech Messages
Attached is a first rough cut. Work continues but wanted to distribute for
feedback. All is welcome and appreciated.
=====================================
|
1,748 |
Subject: RE: reply
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/gspp_conference/18.
=====================================
Michael,
It looks like we have sponsorship. Jeff Dasovich at Enron (GSPP ~'90) thinks
he
can get commitments from his company and others. He's excited about the idea.
Severin Borenstein of Haas and UCEI and Frank Wolak at Stanford are very
interested.
When you return from vacation could we have a conference call with you, me,
Jeff
and whoever at the school might be involved to proceed with the plan? We were
thinking perhaps a one day session in October with dinner the evening prior,
with a few panels featuring widely varying points of view. We'll need to
figure
out how to get press attention among other things if/when we talk. Enjoy your
vacation.
Thanks.
Rob
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Nacht [SMTP:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2000 2:03 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: reply
>
> Hi Rob: Great idea about a seminar on electric power. I'm on vacation for
> awhile, but once classes rev up in late August we'll see if we can put it
> on. I'm sure there would be great interest. Thanks also for your efforts
> with the alums which are really beginning to pay off. Have a nice rest of
> the summer. Cheers, Michael
=====================================
|
1,749 |
Subject: FW: Supreme Court Petition
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/1466.
=====================================
We need to get CRA or CMTA to sign on -- because they were in the earlier Preferred Policy decision plus they filed for rehearing in this case as well. This can be circulated. I'll send it to the Metals people.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ed Duncan [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 5:12 PM
To: Mara, Susan
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Supreme Court Petition
Sue,
Attached is a draft of the Petition which can be circulated.
I recommend that an Alliance member join the Alliance as a Petitioner to eliminate any issue about standing. I am assuming that there is at least one willing member who was also a formal party to the proceeding which resulted in the Preferred Policy Decision. Was the Alliance a formal party to that proceeding?
The basic structure of the Petition is complete. I shall complile the Exhibits and then review same to determine whether the citations and to add any arguments which have been overlooked.
I would like to file on November 9. I think that this Petition and the Commonwealth Petition should be filed on the same day. If you concur, I will coordinate with Commonwealth's counsel.
I look forward to your comments. EWD
=====================================
|
1,750 |
Subject: WGA Schedules for the Week of May 28 - June 1, 2001
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/13191.
=====================================
Western Government Affairs
WEEKLY SCHEDULES
For the Week of May 28 =01) June 1, 2001
Paul Kaufman
Mon 5/28 Memorial Day
Tue 5/29 Portland OR office, a.m.; Cheyenne, p.m.
Wed 5/30 Cheyenne
Thur 5/31 Portland OR office
Fri 6/1 Portland OR office
Sue Mara
Mon 5/28 Memorial Day
Tue 5/29 San Francisco CA office, a.m.
Wed 5/30 AReM meeting in Sac'to
Thur 5/31 San Francisco CA office; Kid duty a.m. & p.m.
Fri 6/1 Kid duty a.m. & p.m.;=20
10 a.m. =01) 3 p.m.: IEP Public Affairs meeting =01) Sacramento CA
Jeff Dasovich
Mon 5/28 Memorial Day
Tue 5/29 San Francisco CA office*
Wed 5/30 San Francisco CA office*
Thur 5/31 San Francisco CA office*
Fri 6/1 San Francisco CA office*
Sandi McCubbin
Mon 5/28 Memorial Day
Tue 5/29 Sacramento CA
Wed 5/30 Sacramento CA
Thur 5/31 San Francisco CA; Los Angeles CA
Fri 6/1 San Francisco CA=20
Mona Petrochko
Mon 5/28 Memorial Day
Tue 5/29 Atlanta GA*
Wed 5/30 Atlanta GA/Tampa FL*
Thur 5/31 Tampa FL
Fri 6/1 Tampa FL
Alan Comnes
Mon 5/28 Memorial Day
Tue 5/29 Enron, Washington DC office
Wed 5/30 Enron, Washington DC office
Thur 5/31 Enron, Washington DC office
Fri 6/1 Portland OR office
*Subject to change
=====================================
|
1,751 |
Subject: FW: Proposed NARUC resolution on hedging
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/2649.
=====================================
Something you guys might want to support....
-----Original Message-----
From: Hill, Karen [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 2:08 PM
To: #FRCEMAIL; State Regulatory Committee; RATECTE-LDCs
Subject: Proposed NARUC resolution on hedging
Attached below is a resolution that EEI is considering proposing to NARUC
recommending that regulators allow utilities to recover the costs of
hedging. Please let me know if the language of this resolution is
acceptable to your company. One concern that has occurred to me is whether
we would always want to pass along to consumers the gains and losses
incurred under risk mitigation programs. If not, then we might want to
suggest adding some language to the effect that while such rate treatment
would certainly be appropriate, companies might opt for a program where
gains or losses incurred under risk mitigation programs are not reflected in
rates at all. Thanks for your attention and input. EEI is looking for
comments by June 13.
A. Karen Hill
Vice President Regulatory Affairs
American Gas Association
400 North Capitol Street
Washington, DC 20001
202-824-7225
202-824-9125 (fax)
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
- EEI hedging resolution.doc
=====================================
|
1,752 |
Subject: Enron Year End 2000 Performance Management Process
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/2587.
=====================================
Enron's Year-End 2000 Performance Management Process opens on:
WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 25th.
During this process, you will be able to suggest reviewers who can provide
feedback on your performance. In addition, you may be requested to provide
feedback on fellow employees. To participate in the feedback process, access
the Performance Management System (PEP) at http://pep.corp.enron.com . Your
UserID and Password are provided below.
The system will be open for feedback from October 25th - November 17th, and
Help Desk representatives will be available to answer questions throughout
the process. You may contact the Help Desk at:
Houston: 1-713-853-4777, Option 4
London: 44-207-783-4040, Option 4
E-mail: [email protected]
During the year-end PRC process, employee profiles will be made available at
meetings. If you haven't already done so, we encourage you to update your
personal information and current responsibilities before the meeting process
begins on November 20th. Please access eHRonline at
http://ehronline.enron.com (London users please go to http://home.enron.co.uk
, click on Quick Links, and choose HR Online).
Your User ID & Password are:
User ID: 90008808
Password: WELCOME
=====================================
|
1,753 |
Subject: Update Load Management Subcommittee Meeting
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/469.
=====================================
Here is an update on the major discussion items:
Real Time Pricing:
Please review the enclosed proposed decision of July 19. We need to have our comments in by Thursday, July 25.
Conservation Voltage Reduction project:
At our last load management subcommittee, we voted to recommend CEC to fund a proposal from EPRI to answer some critical issues related to conservation voltage reduction so that we all can make informed decisions. The project required continual update on the project from EPRI and our feedback to EPRI/CEC. Please find the updated scope of work on this project. If you have any specific questions or issues that you want addressed, please let us know.
Energy baseline adjustment with ambient temperature:
Our loads in the Silicon Valley are very temperature sensitive which can have enormous effects on ho baseline loads are calculated. I have some data to share. It is important to all who are participating or planning to participate in any demand responsive programs.
See you at 1:30PM!
Mukesh Khattar
Energy Director
Oracle Corporation
(650) 506-6980; fax (650) 633-1638
- RTP proposed decision 071901.doc
- EPRI_SVMG_Draft_Proposal_to CEC_for_CVR_Rev072401.doc
=====================================
|
1,754 |
Subject: Re: Articles
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/8017.
=====================================
Thanks for the articles. Well, not quite in PJs, but yes, working from home,
which is some consolation. PG&E has said that a signficant share of gas
suppliers have stopped transacting with PG&E due to credit risk. Our
exposure to PG&E is huge (both EES and ENA), so I wouldn't be surprised if
we've stopped transacting with them until the Commission comes out with its
decision on the 4th and we see how the ratings agencies respond. I can find
out first thing Tuesday morning.
And a very happy and safe new year to you, too.
Best,
Jeff
Karen Denne
12/30/2000 04:34 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Articles
So are you in your PJs working at your computer at home? Just teasing!
Thought you'd be interested in these LA Times articles. FYI, I got two calls
yesterday (Dow Jones and Bloomberg) about us refusing to sell gas to PG&E --
all the traders were gone, so I couldn't get an answer and Steve didn't
know. Let me know if you hear anything.
Happy New Year!
:-) kd
http://www.latimes.com/business/reports/power/lat_power001230.htm
http://www.latimes.com/business/reports/power/lat_bryson001230.htm
http://www.latimes.com/business/reports/power/lat_gas001230.htm
=====================================
|
1,755 |
Subject: Surprise Cellar Sale -- EXCLUSIVE for Members Only
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/4572.
=====================================
Surprise Cellar Sale -- Exclusive For Members Only
Don't want to wait around for post-holiday bargains? We can relate.
That's why we're offering up to 20 percent off a limited selection of
themed wines, right in the heat of the holiday season.
We've pulled together our Top 12 wine recommendations under the
following themes: Undiscovered Gems, Tour de France, Anything
but Napa, and California Nuggets.
And, if you order all 12 bottles in any one of these categories,
you'll see it's priced to include an additional 10 percent case
discount... a total of nearly one-third savings!
Maybe best of all, as a wine.com newsletter subscriber, you get first
crack at these great deals. Remember, we'll be letting everyone in on
this sale December 14, so shop now!
Click on any category below for more information on this
special sale.
_____________________________________________________________________
Undiscovered Gems
Tour de France
Anything but Napa
California Nuggets
Void where prohibited by law. Supplies are limited.
_____________________________________________________________________
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS NEWSLETTER, go to:
http://wine1.m0.net/m/u/vin/vv.asp?e=jdasovic%40enron.com
=====================================
|
1,756 |
Subject: Re: Response
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/8012.
=====================================
Thanks.
Frank W Vickers@ECT
12/29/2000 12:46 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Terry Donovan
Subject: Response
Jeff, we need to add some discussion focused on QF issues in California and
how resolution to certain items would enhance QF ownership and provide the
utilities with optimal performance of the QF's and perhaps encourage new
capacity development at existing QF locations.
The utilities should be motivated to enter into buyout, buydown, blend and
extend, negotiate fixed energy prices and other restructuring transactions
with the QF's.
The utilites have the ability to hedge the floating price currently being
paid to the QF's. They should be motivated to look into these structures.
Utilities should provide some clarification to the energy prices under QF
PPA's. There is alot of risks around SRAC and PX that affect both the
utilities and the QF owners. It seems like resolution to that risk is
beneficial to both the utility as well as the QF.
QF's should have the ability to move excess capacity and energy into either
the market and/or to the utility. That would create additional economic
incentives for the QF's to run and perhaps increase their capacity.
Frank
=====================================
|
1,757 |
Subject: nan
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/12285.
=====================================
Marybeth:
I apologize. As I mentioned, this situation is extremely fluid. I also
mentioned this morning that in yesterday's meeting w/the Governor, it was
agreed that the meetings would continue, every day, until the thing got
resolved. I was just informed that I've been elected by my management to be
on today's call (Steve Kean and I will be our representatives). It starts at
1PM. We are scheduled to talk at 2:30 PM. I'm hoping--but not altogether
hopeful---that the call will end before 2:30.
I can't apologize enough for the scheduling problems, particularly since I'm
the one who originated the request to chat with Laura.
We can do it one of several ways; it's completely your call: 1) play it by
ear, and I can let you know around 2:15 if I think the call's going to wrap
up by 2:30. 2) we can reschedule (I would of course very much like to brief
Laura on what's going on). 3) you can decide it's too much trouble and throw
up your hands, which I would understand.
Let me know how you 'd like to proceed and please give my sincere apologies
(and best) to Laura. I have to get on the call right now, so if you need to
speak to a live person, give Joseph a call at 415.782.7841.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
1,758 |
Subject: Re: PowerPoint info
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/4241.
=====================================
Carolyn:
I wanted to apologize for the way the group dynamic has shaped up. It's
clear to me that you're a bit frustrated, and if I've contributed, I
apologize.
You've done the most work on this project, your contribution has been very
significant, and I personally am not satisfied about the way that the stuff
you've pulled together (and your views) have been included. At some point,
though, it gets tough beating one's head against the wall. Seems to me that,
in a group, everyone should have some of their views included---that's what
groups and compromises are all about. After all, it's school. We've made a
lot of sacrifices to do it, and the point is to learn.
Anyway, I hope you'll still comment on the presentation, and I'm glad that
you've agreed to do part of it on Thursday. For my part, I felt that I
pushed yesterday about as much as I'm prepared to push and at this point,
I'll put the ratios tables together, offer a few edits, buy don' t see much
use going to the mat.
Overall, I think it'll be an okay presentation, though getting there has
been, well, bumpy.
But thanks very much for all the work you did. It was important, and the
presentation is better off for it.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
1,759 |
Subject: Shuttles & the Evening News
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/1202.
=====================================
Hello to all the new students and welcome back to the rest.
*Shuttle Confusion*
Well, looks like there's a bit of confusion out there for those that actually read our back to school packet (which I'm sure was all of you) in regards to the shuttle. The shuttle pick-up times will remain the same as last semester 4:15pm, not 4:30 or 4:20. Also, the South Bay Shuttle pick-up location also remains the same, at Our Lady's Way, not S3 Inc. parking lot.
Sorry about the confusion.
On a lighter note, the EVENING NEWS is looking for submissions! So if your exciting life has EVEN MORE exciting events, let us know. Not only do we want to know about it, but we want to see it too. So if you have pictures with your submission, that's great. So you can tell us about recent births, promotions, changes, or even let us know what you did this summer - anything that you want to share with your fellow students.
You can submit your contribution by e-mail (slee@haas), fax (510-643-5901), or regular mail. It could be written on a paper bag, cocktail napkin, even a palimpsest. It's all good. We just want to hear from you about you.
Thanks.
Seung Lee
Assistant Director
Evening MBA Program
Haas School of Business
=====================================
|
1,760 |
Subject: CAISO Historic Load Data
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/12101.
=====================================
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 07/23/2001 01:14 PM -----
Susan J Mara
07/20/2001 06:47 PM
To: [email protected]
cc: Tom Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: CAISO Historic Load Data
Here is the link for the load data on the CA ISO's web site. Although the
ISO has some time limit on keeping data, it goes back at least as far as Jan
'01. We didn't check any earlier. Feel free to call with any questions.
Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 07/20/2001 04:45 PM -----
Dave Perrino@ECT
07/20/2001 03:00 PM
To: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: CAISO Historic Load Data
Sue,
From this link: http://oasis.caiso.com/ the information your are looking for
can be obtained. Once the CA ISO OASIS homepage comes up, click on the
"System Load" tab in the upper righthand corner, this will bring you to the
"System Load Reports" page. From this page you can query the ISO's database.
From trying to query the data, I have found out that you can request no more
than 31 days of data at a time.
Hope this helps, any questions, just let me know.
Kind Regards,
Dave
=====================================
|
1,761 |
Subject: Next Week's Energy Committee Meeting
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/13026.
=====================================
Energy Committee Members:
As many of you kindly brought to my attention last week, Monday, May 28 is a
recognized holiday. Therefore, the energy committee meeting scheduled for
that day has been postponed. Unfortunately, the Motorola site on Kifer Road
is not available next week.
Thanks to Mike Brown and the kindness and flexibility of Motorola, the
energy committee has been offered a meeting room at Motorola's San Jose site
located at 3041 Orchard Parkway for Wednesday, May 30 at 3:00pm. Due to a
very limited space capacity (20-25 people only), we need to know by close of
business Friday, May 25 how many people expect to participate on Wednesday's
meeting.
However, we do hope to accommodate all committee members who plan to
participate in this meeting and do not want to exclude any member because of
limited capacity. If your organization has a meeting room that can
accommodate our group (40-50 people) on May 30 from 1-5pm (to accommodate
the Business Continuity Subcommittee as well) please let me know ASAP. I
would like to give Mike confirmation by this Friday if we will be using the
Motorola facility.
Please RSVP before close of business on Friday by responding to this e-mail
or calling 408-501-7870.
=====================================
|
1,762 |
Subject: Global Photon
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/605.
=====================================
Jeff:
It looks like Tim Stamnitz, CEO of Global Photon, could schedule a meeting
at 3PM on either July 5 or 6 at their office in San Diego.(One American
Plaza,
600 West Broadway, Suite 1200, San Diego, CA 92101.
I could attend either of these times as well. We will need to finalize the
NDA before financials are disclosed, so probably that will all happen at the
meeting if we get the NDA worked out over this coming week.
As I indicated, I will be in Denver next week, but can get voicemail and
email.
Jim
=================
James M. Tobin
Morrison & Foerster
425 Market Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
(415) 268-7678
(415) 276-7678 (facsimile)
[email protected] (email)
============================================================================
This message contains information which may be confidential and privileged.
Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive for the addressee),
you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or any information
contained in the message. If you have received the message in error, please
advise the sender by reply e-mail @mofo.com, and delete the message.
Thank you very much.
============================================================================
=====================================
|
1,763 |
Subject: RE: Memorial Day Weekend
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/12742.
=====================================
Congratulations from me too.? I hope you two are as happily married as I
am.? I mean we are.? Right dear?
Regards, the Sheas
-----Original Message-----
From: Carter Hachman [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 10:27 AM
To: '[email protected]'; '[email protected]';
'[email protected]'; '[email protected]';
'[email protected]'; '[email protected]';
'[email protected]'; Shea, Chris; '[email protected]';
'[email protected]'; '[email protected]';
'[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]';
'[email protected]'; 'celise clevenger'
Subject: Memorial Day Weekend
Cameron and Scotty sitting in a tree
K-I-S-S-I-N-G
First comes love
Then comes marriage
Then Prentice and Cammie stop living together
;-)
Congratulations!? You two are fantastic!? I'm on for the entire weekend and
will bring mucho vino -- and none from a box.? Nancy, Triple piggy will have
to be played on the deck with no railings.? I've been doing back exercises
and am good to go.?
Looking forward to it!
xo
Carter
Carter K. Hachman
Sr. Brand Strategist
marchFIRST/SBi
415-369-6347 work
415-846-1206 cell
=====================================
|
1,764 |
Subject: Customer Credit Extended
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/790.
=====================================
Wanted to let you know that AB995 which extends the customer credit
subaccount (collection of nonbypassable system benefit charge to go through
1/1/12) was passed by both the CA Assembly and Senate, and was signed into
law by the Governor on 9/30. Attached below is a link to the bill (click on
enrolled version).
The following is a brief summary:
(1) Allots up to $81 million dollars to provide customer credits for
purchases of renewable energy, to promote purchase of renewables, develop
consumer market for renewable energy;
(2) 14% of the money, up to 75.6 million, shall be used to provide customer
credits;
(3) The customer credit shall not exceed 1.5 cents per KWh;
(4) cap of $1,000 remains for larger customers UNLESS the funds for the
preceding calendar year remain at 1.5 cents per KWh. In this case, the $1000
cap will be lifted for the present calendar year, taking into account that no
more than $15 million of the total customer incentive funds are awarded to
the larger classes of customers (other than residential and small commercial
customers).
The exact amount and allotment per year of the customer credit are to be
determined.
Stacey
http://www.assembly.ca.gov/acs/acsframeset2text.htm
=====================================
|
1,765 |
Subject: RE: Transwestern Hearing
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/29161.
=====================================
ouch. will do. I'll get you what i can as soon as i can.
best,
Jeff
Shelley Corman/ENRON@enronXgate
07/26/2001 12:46 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: RE: Transwestern Hearing
Along with the TW order setting a hearing, the FERC has also imposed new
reporting requirements for deliveries starting August 1. The questions ask
TW to provide daily nominated, scheduled and delivered at Cal. border
points. I think this data will lead FERC to further ask about why the
scheduled number is so often below the nominated and I want to be prepared to
explain the window process. With Jeff Fawcett and Julia White both gone, I
guess I draw the lucky straw of explaining this.
Any info that you can forward in the next week or two would be appreciated.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 12:43 PM
To: Corman, Shelley
Subject: RE: Transwestern Hearing
i think that i can get you something. how quickly do you need it?
best,
jeff
Shelley Corman/ENRON@enronXgate 07/26/2001 12:28 PM To: Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: RE: Transwestern Hearing
Do you have any materials that describe SoCal's current windowing procedure?
=====================================
|
1,766 |
Subject: Re: Edited Draft of FERC Presentation
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/717.
=====================================
Mary & Joe --
Given the time frame for our response (2 - 4 minutes), we need to prepare not
only our "leave behind" but also our "oral message".
I want to make sure that everyone agrees with the theme and content of our
verbal discussions. Can you please put out an outline of the message and
details and then make sure the Trading desk and CA Govt Affairs agree with
the form and delivery (set up a conference call if necessary)?
This is a very complicated issue and very short time frame to deliver. The
more we prepare I think the better we'll do.
Thanks,
Jim
Mary Hain@ECT
08/22/2000 08:28 AM
To: Joe Hartsoe@Enron, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
[email protected], James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, [email protected], Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan J
Mara/SFO/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Edited Draft of FERC Presentation
Attached is new and improved version of the FERC presentation. Delete the
one I sent you yesterday. Detach and play "slide show" to see the short
version that would be used for the presentation. The additional pages would
be distributed in hard copy as a reference document. The document includes
a few minor corrections and spellchecks, formats, etc.
=====================================
|
1,767 |
Subject: Re: Interconnection benefits
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/4582.
=====================================
Jennifer
We do but I am running pretty hard on another filing right now. Are you
back on Friday?
Alan
To: Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Interconnection benefits
Alan:
Did you still need my help on this? If so, please send me more info. and/or
call me at 713.345.3550. Please note I will be out of the office all day
Thursday for a meeting in NYC.
Jennifer
From: James D Steffes on 04/02/2001 08:19 AM
To: Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jennifer Thome/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Interconnection benefits
Alan--
Pls use Jennifer Thome.
Jim
----- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 04/02/2001 08:19 AM -----
Alan Comnes@ECT
03/29/2001 08:15 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Steve
Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Interconnection benefits
I think I have the basic data to do an estimate of interconnection benefits.
Flow data is summarized in the attached chart.
It'll take a day or so of someone's time to crank out the benefit
calculation. It's a little tricky lining up the gas and power data.
Jim is there an access/excel jockey I could tap for such help? Otherwise I'm
going to plea for some external help.
=====================================
|
1,768 |
Subject: RE:
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/86.
=====================================
Enron's protest of the AL, despite its limited nature, held up the approval
as would be expected. It also got the attention of those at the Commission
who want a piece of everything, as you should have also expected. As a
result, we were told that the only way to sell it was to file an 851
explaining what we had already explained in the AL., because that is what
the bureaucracy demands. As I spoke with you earlier about, the protest
would be the death knell. Although we have transferred the site to a third
party under license, we now have to wait for the Commission to bless it.
Enron knows how state Commission's work as evidenced by it purchase and now
future sale of PGE. The problem is, your intervention hasn't done much for
the spirit of cooperation internally......
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Dasovich [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 1999 5:57 PM
To: Cherry, Brian - TPBKC
Subject:
what gives? i have not seen a decision from the commission on the energy
marketplace advice letter. yet you've filed something new saying you will
file
an 851? why?
and thanks again for giving us time at yesterday's meeting. shame the group
can't come up with a compromise.
- att1.htm
=====================================
|
1,769 |
Subject: review sessions, evaluations
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/46.
=====================================
This is the final session for review sessions. The Haas review will be
held from 9-12 Saturday morning in the Anderson auditorium. The Peninsula
review will be held from 3-6 at Geron as per Pamela Smith's e-mails. The
format will be as follows. For the first hour and a half I will review
the course material. The following time will be spent answering questions.
Questions on the most difficult problems from the problem sets should be
asked at a different time so as to maximize class welfare. Once again,
you should determine areas of confusion some time this week so we can deal
with them with sufficient time. I am willing to provide plenty of help
this week, whether in person or over email. Just to warn you, I will not
be spending Sunday at my computer answering emails. Therefore catch me
while I am stuck at my computer, namely all this week. I hope you all are
well, and will see you either tuesday or saturday. One more thing. We
will be passing out GSI evaluations today and tomorrow. Please take these
seriously. Your suggestions are extremely useful to me. The results of
these evaluations do matter. Thanks for taking the time to do these.
J. Lamar Pierce
Ph.D Student
Haas School of Business
UC Berkeley
=====================================
|
1,770 |
Subject: draft (fwd)
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/mba_program/40.
=====================================
Sirs, here is the current draft of the paper.
A couple of notes:
(1) Marty, I hacked at your section a bit last night trying to funnel it
into a couple of direct hypotheses (I failed). I hope you don't mind my
changes (overall structure is the same). Also, should we footnote your
references; it looks strange to hit Jeff's section and suddenly have refs
footnoted.
(2) Mike, I was trying to warm up to conclusion by writing up
some of methodology section. Sorry to duplicate effort- you can delete and
replace
with yours or merge.
(3) The survey results/conclusions - I am pretty much ready to go here and
expect about 2 hrs of work (that means the complete draft should be in
your mail box tomorrow morning). HOWEVER- i am having a hard time framing
the results without direct hypotheses to affirm/disaffirm.
SO, Marty and Jeff, can you two review the intro section and respond to my
note and return your suggestions to me?
Please respond to my Haas email and not work, as I may take a couple of
hours off during the middle of the day to go work on the paper at school.
With the end in sight,
Jonathan
*********************
* Jonathan Hudacko *
* 510.649.6476 (WK) *
* 415.305.4293 (HM) *
*********************
- E205_paper.doc
=====================================
|
1,771 |
Subject: Electricity Crisis
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/3059.
=====================================
FYI. Teece is the economist at Berkeley who acted as the ringleader for the
"manifesto."
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 01/29/2001 03:14 PM -----
David Teece <[email protected]>
01/29/2001 02:33 PM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Electricity Crisis
TO:?????AD HOC GROUP ON THE ELECTRICITY CRISIS
Assemblyman Joe Nation put a bill in the hopper Friday, January 26th, which
he believes is congruent with our thinking (see attached).? He is seeking our
comments and possible endorsements.
Please send your comments directly to Joe Nation at <[email protected]>, and
let me know whether you believe we should work with him and consider
endorsing his bill.
Thanks,
David Teece
- nation memo 012601.pdf
- nation draft bill page 2.pdf
- nation draft bill page 3.pdf
- nation draft bill page 4.pdf
- nation draft bill page 1.pdf
- nation memo 012701.pdf
======================================
David J. Teece, Director
Institute of Management, Innovation and Organization
F402 Haas School of Business #1930
University of California, Berkeley
Berkeley, CA 94720-1930
Phone: (510) 642-1075
Fax: (510) 642-2826
http://haas.berkeley.edu/~imio
======================================
=====================================
|
1,772 |
Subject: Status of Haas Friends Affected by Yesterday's Tragic Events
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/1741.
=====================================
Members of the Haas Community:
We are all saddened by yesterday's tragic events. This is likely to have
personal ramifications for colleagues, friends, and families with close
connections to the Haas School of Business and UC Berkeley.
Everyone is naturally eager to find out whether anyone from the extended
Haas community has been affected. A website has been put up and is being
used by many business schools to provide information in light of this
national tragedy. The address is http://www.finebrand.com/statuses. The
site posts status reports of individuals by school and by class year. We
encourage you to help update this information. Please note, however, that
the School is not able, at this early stage, to confirm the accuracy of the
information posted on this site.
Thank you for helping to alert the Haas community about those who may be in
need of support. This is a sad time for our community and our nation. As
Associate Dean Ben Hermalin counseled us yesterday, we must recognize that
many people will be severely affected by what has happened, and that they
require our sympathy, understanding, and support.
Jay Stowsky
Associate Dean, School Affairs and Initiatives
(on behalf of Dean Laura Tyson)
=====================================
|
1,773 |
Subject: Status on Feedback to Governor
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/2784.
=====================================
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 01/02/2001 10:44 AM -----
Jeff Dasovich
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
01/02/2001 09:30 AM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Status on Feedback to Governor
Steve: I'm going to give you a call. Few things:
I've proposed a template for how to provide feedback on the Gov's specific
proposals, using direct investment in power plants by the state as the
illustrative example. Let me know if you think it works. I have ideas on
each, but thought it better to await feedback from the commercial folks
before filling out our comments in each area.
I'm finishing up a bit more detailed proposal for how the Gov might use
"energy gurus" to help on the portfolio/procurment issues, and am also
offering additional detail on the need for a "rate summit."
Got messages in to Schroeder re: Nordpool--expect to hear back from him today
at some point and I can drop that info into the document soon as I get it.
Will talk to EES at 10 AM CST to discuss their proposals. If you'd like to
join that call, let me know and I'll forward along the call-in number, which
I think you may already have in your email.
Have received a few comments from ENA that I'll incorporate.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
1,774 |
Subject: Update Load Management Subcommittee Meeting
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/29090.
=====================================
Here is an update on the major discussion items:
Real Time Pricing:
Please review the enclosed proposed decision of July 19. We need to have our
comments in by Thursday, July 25.
Conservation Voltage Reduction project:
At our last load management subcommittee, we voted to recommend CEC to fund
a proposal from EPRI to answer some critical issues related to conservation
voltage reduction so that we all can make informed decisions. The project
required continual update on the project from EPRI and our feedback to
EPRI/CEC. Please find the updated scope of work on this project. If you have
any specific questions or issues that you want addressed, please let us
know.
Energy baseline adjustment with ambient temperature:
Our loads in the Silicon Valley are very temperature sensitive which can
have enormous effects on ho baseline loads are calculated. I have some data
to share. It is important to all who are participating or planning to
participate in any demand responsive programs.
See you at 1:30PM!?
?
?Mukesh Khattar
Energy Director
Oracle Corporation
(650) 506-6980; fax (650) 633-1638
?
- RTP proposed decision 071901.doc
- EPRI_SVMG_Draft_Proposal_to CEC_for_CVR_Rev072401.doc
=====================================
|
1,775 |
Subject: Re:
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/10106.
=====================================
FYI. Info regarding conversations between Ken Lay and Bob Glynn (CEO of PG&E
Corp) regarding payment by PG&E to us of the negative CTC credit.
Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/19/2001 11:26 AM -----
Steven J Kean
03/19/2001 07:53 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re:
The conversation was very positive (Glynn did not know anything about it at
first, but, looked into it and called Ken back Friday evening). Glynn said
they were including the amount owed in their negotiations over the price for
the transmission assets and said they intended to pay all of their debts,
including this one, as soon as they get paid. He said that this weekk would
be focussed on finalizing a deal for SCE given the threat of bankruptcy; the
discussions would then turn to PG&E.
Jeff Dasovich
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
03/14/2001 07:03 PM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject:
Steve:
Jim mentioned that Ken Lay was trying to talk to Glynn today about getting
the PX credit issue resolved. Any progress made?
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
1,776 |
Subject: Re: you and me
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/8281.
=====================================
You know, generally, when I'm up in the morning, hanging around, getting=20
ready to start the day, I can't see any reason to put clothes on. I am muc=
h=20
more comfortable that way. Always been that way.
Good goal. It would be easiest for me to have the meeting in SF. Next=20
week's fine for me. Monday's a day off for me. You? Or we could set=20
something up in the morning next week. Just let me know.
=09Cameron Sellers <[email protected]>
=0901/11/2001 12:16 PM
=09=09=20
=09=09 To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
=09=09 cc:=20
=09=09 Subject: you and me
Sorry for surprising you this morning!! Nothing wrong with being
comfortable in your birthday suit.
Speaking of birthdays, I think we should have a goal to get my company
acquired by your company by May 30, 2001. Good goal, huh??
I want to talk to you about the details I have been thinking about while yo=
u
were gone. When should we talk?? Let=01,s set up a meeting so we make sur=
e to
move this all forward.
Welcome back.
-C
Cameron Sellers
Vice President, Business Development
PERFECT
1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210
Palo Alto, CA 94303
[email protected]
650.798.3366 (direct dial)
650.269.3366 (cell)
650.858.1095 (fax)
=====================================
|
1,777 |
Subject: RE: QF Ideas
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/12231.
=====================================
Sounds good. See you at 11.
Best,
Jeff
Michael Etringer/ENRON@enronXgate
07/31/2001 04:26 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Alan Comnes/ENRON@enronXgate, Jonalan Page/ENRON@enronXgate, Angela
Cadena/ENRON@enronXgate, Andrea Woodland/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications
Subject: RE: QF Ideas
Sounds good.
I have reserved Mt. Bachelor conf room for 11:00 tomorrow.
Also, I am forwarding the invite to Alan Comnes, Jonalan Page ,Angela Cadena
and Andrea Woodland. They were a part of the discussion with Dave.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 2:11 PM
To: Etringer, Michael
Subject: RE: QF Ideas
Howzabout 11 AM?
Michael Etringer/ENRON@enronXgate 07/31/2001 03:58 PM To: Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: RE: QF Ideas
I can be available most of the day except 2:00-3:00. Let me know if you have
a set meeting schedule.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 1:48 PM
To: Etringer, Michael
Subject: QF Ideas
Hi Mike:
Parquet found me to talk about the QF ideas that you guys are bouncing
around. I'll be in Portland tomorrow. You have some time to sit and discuss
a bit?
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
1,778 |
Subject: Berkeley Entrepreneurs Forum, November 30
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/3832.
=====================================
UC Berkeley Entrepreneurs Forum
Thursday, November 30, 2000
6:30 PM
Haas School of Business
Andersen Auditorium
__________________________________________________________________
Topic:??????????Bricks to Click in the New Internet Reality: How to Shorten
the Path to Profitability
Speakers:??????Dan Beldy, Hummer Winblad Venture Partners, Todd Dunnina and
Brian Dunning, co-founders, Buylink, Inc.
Learn more about how leading venture capital firms choose their investments
and how those firms position themselves to attract such investment.
????????
Registration: There are special rates for faculty and staff. Faculty and
staff are encouraged to pre-register by E-mail.
Note registration procedure for students:
a) in person with cash or check in room F450, weekdays 9AM to 4PM.
b) with MC/Visa over the phone, please call (510) 642 4255
The fee for pre- registration is $5. There will be a $10 registration fee at
the door. Note: On-site registration is subject to space available. Pre-
registration for students and staff closes at 4PM on Tuesday, November 28 or
earlier if it is sold out.
Information:
For more information on the series, please visit our Website at
http://www.haas.berkeley.edu/~lester/bef.html
=====================================
|
1,779 |
Subject: SBX18
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/11490.
=====================================
Jennifer,
Jeff has been tied up today and apologizes for not getting back sooner, but I
did manage to speak with him re: the above.
SBX18, if passed, would provide for a Core/ Noncore customer split, similar
to that of the natural gas markets. Utilities would be required to establish
a portfolio of electric supplies to serve the needs of bundled core
cusomers. Ninety days after the end of the rate freeze, determined by the
Commission, customers with loads greater than 500 kilowatts would not be
allowed to obtain service from the core portfolio. Any noncore customer not
taking electricity directly from an ESP would be provided power by the
utility exclusively from the spot market and would be charged the cost
incurred by the utility in providing such service.
Jeff's assesment is that the bill, in its current form, has less that a 50/50
chance of passage. The bill is highly controversial pitting the core against
noncore customers. Without any transition period, the bill could have a
significant negative impact to Enron's current book position.
If you have any additional questions, please feel free to call.
SBX 18
http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/bill/sen/sb_0001-0050/sbx1_18_bill_20010125_introdu
ced.pdf
=====================================
|
1,780 |
Subject: FW: Fw: The Farmer and The Police Officer
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/1461.
=====================================
> -
> > > > > > > A farmer got pulled over by a state trooper for speeding,? and
the trooper started to lecture the farmer about his speed, and in general
began to throw his weight around to try to make the farmer uncomfortable.
Finally, the trooper got around to writing out the ticket, and as he was
doing that he kept swatting at some flies that were buzzing
around his head.? The farmer said, "Having some problems with circle flies
there, are ya?"
The trooper stopped writing the ticket and said- "Well yeah, if that's what
they are-I never heard of circle? flies."
So the farmer says-"Well, circle flies are common on farms. See,? they're
called circle flies because they're almost always
found circling around the back end of a horse."
The trooper says, "Oh," and goes back to writing the ticket. Then after a
minute he stops and says, "Hey...wait a minute, are you
trying to call me a horses ass?"
The farmer says, "Oh no, officer. I have too much respect for law enforcement
and police officers to even think about calling you
a horses ass."
The trooper says, "Well, that's a good thing," and goes? back to writing the
ticket.
After a long pause, the farmer says, "Hard to fool them flies though."
> > > > > >
>
=====================================
|
1,781 |
Subject: Team Project #2---Problem #2
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/5.
=====================================
I think Dennis, Shawne and I were supposed to work more on #2, but since I
can't recall, I'm sending to all.
First, I apologize. I tried to work directly with the excellent spreadsheet
Carolyn put together, but I kept fumbling, butchering, etc. So I canibalized
her great stuff and created a new spreadsheet, attempting to incorporate the
"clarifications" (yeah, right) that Prof McCullough distributed via email,
and the stuff we talked about during break (i.e., timing of cash flows). The
answers are at the bottom of the work sheet. And I've also included the
report (though I did not peruse it for errors, relevancy, etc.).
My biggest concern is question 6. My answer (despite some outliers) sez
that there ain't no loan in June. (This may mean my spreadsheet's got a
fatal flaw--significant probability.)
Finally, doing a series of 1,000 trials resulted in some considerable
variability across runs--again, could be due to screw up on my part--so the
answers I generatd comes from a run of 5,000 trials. (If you run the sheet,
beware, 5,000 takes some time, unless you've got DSL or something.)
Let me know if this is completely out to lunch, or if you're coming up with
something remotely similar.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
1,782 |
Subject: RE: Meet
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/3229.
=====================================
Hey: we meeting tonite? can you BELIEVE this bloody election?
Jacqueline Kelly <[email protected]>
11/07/2000 04:28 PM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, Jacqueline Kelly
<[email protected]>, "'Kimberly Kupiecki'" <[email protected]>,
[email protected]
cc:
Subject: RE: Meet
I agree that we need to get together. I am going to grind out a spreadsheet
tomorrow night. Unfortunately, my friends birthday dinner is Thursday
night. I know Ted is going to be gone for the weekend.
Can we get together tomorrow or over the weekend without Ted? Ted is going
to do some research on the discount rate, which can be dropped in to any
analysis that we come up with.
What do you think?
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2000 2:21 PM
To: Jacqueline Kelly; 'Kimberly Kupiecki'; [email protected]
Subject: Meet
Hey, I know it's a pain, but I think there would be value in getting
together (if folks are available) on Thursday evening from 7-10 with (lots
of) beer and pizza and grind through the finance case. We can do it at my
apartment, or anywhere else you folks would like to do it. Thoughts?
=====================================
|
1,783 |
Subject: Gas Presentation
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/921.
=====================================
Hi. Nice to see you in Houston. I'm giving a presentation on gas issues on
Tuesday. I've got a draft of the message points you circulated on 9.28
regarding "why gas prices have increased" (have those changed?); I've got Ken
Lay's gas presentation before the National Governor's Conference (9.20.00);
and Gil Muhl's presentation to the AGA in Washington D.C. on 9.19.00. Are
there other presentations that would useful to look at in preparation for the
talk?
Finally, rest assured, you're the best resource anyone could hope for on gas
issues anywhere in Enron. If it seems like I've bugged you less recently
it's because 1) I feel like I've bugged you a lot--too much--over the past
couple of years and don't want to wear out my welcome and 2) with the
electricity crisis in California and the start-up of Broadband, my attention
has been less focused on gas. Though that will change soon, since as you may
have heard, PG&E's "Gas Accord" is coming to an end and we've got to figure
out where to go from here. (You'll be hearing from me in the near future on
that issue, since I'll need to get a company-wide view of what we want to
happen out here in the West.)
Look forward to seeing you again real soon.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
1,784 |
Subject: MA PBR Comments
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/374.
=====================================
---------------------- Forwarded by Harry Kingerski/HOU/EES on 02/28/2000
11:31 AM ---------------------------
Enron Energy Services
From: Sue Nord 01/13/2000 09:19 AM
Phone: n/a
To: Harry Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES, Patrick Keene/HOU/EES@EES, Jeff
Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: MA PBR Comments
Hi Guys,
I'm forwarding comments we filed recently with a few other marketers in MA
regarding PBR. These were prepared on the fly, as we only found out about
the deadline for comments the day before they were due. Sorry not to have
floated these by you all before they were filed, but I don't think there
should be anything controversial in here. (They were borrowed pretty much in
their entirety from comments Statoil had filed in another jurisdiction).
One note, the MA restructuring statute requires the DTE to implement PBR for
distribution utilities and provides fairly detailed instruction on how it
should be structured. So the question here was not whether PBR is good, but
how should it be implemented within the context of the MA statute.
Please let me know i f you have any comments or concerns. Also, I will talk
with you before we file anything else in this proceeding.
Sue
=====================================
|
1,785 |
Subject: RE: Meeting with Perfect
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/801.
=====================================
I'll contact Lydia and you'll have materials well in advance of the meeting.
-----Original Message-----
From: Richter, Brad
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 4:20 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Cc: Cannon, Lydia
Subject: RE: Meeting with Perfect
The 13th would work much better, preferably in the afternoon. Please contact Lydia Cannon (713-853-4893) to get a specific time on my calendar. Also, any specific Perfect company information beforehand would be helpful.
Thanks,
Brad
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 4:14 PM
To: Richter, Brad
Subject: RE: Meeting with Perfect
How do the 13th or 20th of November work?
-----Original Message-----
From: Richter, Brad
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 1:03 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: RE: Meeting with Perfect
The 15th is Enron's Management Conference and the 22nd is Thanksgiving. Any other dates?
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 6:29 PM
To: Richter, Brad
Subject: Meeting with Perfect
Hi Brad:
I finally got in touch with the people from Perfect. They'll be in Houston on the 15th and the 22nd of November. Either of those days work for you? If so, any time preference?
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
1,786 |
Subject: Re: Contact List & Conf Call
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/12496.
=====================================
Thanks a million. FYI, I meant to send you a "thank you" note in response to
the note with Friday call-in info, but it went to Steve instead.
Best,
Jeff
Maureen McVicker
05/15/2001 09:30 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Contact List & Conf Call
Yes the list you have is the current list. If it changes w/ additions, I
will be sure and forward you a new copy.
I will set up a call for Friday and will get back with you and the others
regarding the call in number, etc.
From: Jeff Dasovich on 05/14/2001 07:00 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: [email protected]
Subject:
Maureen:
Few things. I was on the call with Steve today and he asked me to do a
couple of things.
1) Send a summary of today's call to the email list that you've put
together. I've got the list from the note you forwarded to me with the
call-in info for today's call. Is that the complete list? If not, could you
foward me the most recent one, which I'll use to distribute the summary?
2) Could you set up another call for this Friday (May 18th) for 60 minutes at
10 CDT/8 AM PDT, and distribute to the same bunch of folks that were on
today's call? Thanks a million.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
1,787 |
Subject: Re: littlechild
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/1090.
=====================================
I can attest to the fact that you hit the bulls-eye, dead center, sir, with
your description. But again, the message is great, and his written stuff, I
think, is effective. Your decision to help fund his participation was an
extremely good one in the end.
Best,
Jeff
Mark Schroeder@ECT
11/21/2000 10:29 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich/Na/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: littlechild
As far as "spicing up", you probably saw him at his sauciest. I only
promised that he would be "taciturn", and I am sure that I did not
oversell! thanks mcs
From: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON on 21/11/2000 10:28 CST
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
To: Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: littlechild
Forgive the tardiness. As soon as I come up from air from completing a tidal
wave of performance reviews, I'll give a full report. Bottom line: His
message is a very good one. His delivery could use a tad spicing up,
however. Unfortunately, when I was free, he was in meetings, and vice
versa. So we never got to sit down and chat. I'll fill you in more soon.
Best,
Jeff
Mark Schroeder@ECT
11/17/2000 11:52 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: littlechild
how did the good professor do? thanks mcs
=====================================
|
1,788 |
Subject: RE: CA Instrate Gas matters
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/11907.
=====================================
Jeff/Leslie/Barry---attached is a quideline that we developed on what our
"global" message on price risk management would be as we talk to PUCs across
the country and was intended to address the issue in both power and gas
markets. It's a good starting point and should obviously then be tailored to
each state's situation.
I am happy to jump on a call to discuss. I will be in Michigan on Monday,
but could be available between 9:30 and 12:00 eastern. (6:30-9:00
pacific--sorry Jeff!!). If you could leave me a voice mail about what time
to talk and whose number to call that would be great. #612-339-4599
If we decide to talk later in the week, I am not open on Tuesday until about
3:30pm central but Wednesday I'm pretty much available all day.
Jeff Dasovich
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
07/13/2001 05:21 PM
To: Leslie Lawner/ENRON@enronXgate
cc: Barry Tycholiz/ENRON@enronXgate, Susan M Landwehr/NA/Enron@ENRON
Subject: RE: CA Instrate Gas matters
I can make time. Let's try to let Leslie vacation. Also, I'm having a memo
prepared that should be ready first thing Monday AM on the CA Commission's
policies regarding utility use of hedging instruments. Just let me know when
you'd like to talk.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
1,789 |
Subject: RE: California Treasurers Calls on Lynch to Immediately Set DA
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/844.
=====================================
Jeff,
In what time frame are these decisions looking at being made? keep me posted on the July 1st roll back since it would have the biggest implications for EWS/EES existing positions.
Thank you,
Jeff Richter
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 5:02 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff; Kean, Steven J.; Shapiro, Richard; Steffes, James D.; Kaufman, Paul; Mara, Susan; Calger, Christopher F.; Tycholiz, Barry; Richter, Jeff; Belden, Tim; Comnes, Alan; Swain, Steve; Sharp, Vicki; Blachman, Jeremy; Dietrich, Janet; Delainey, David; Leff, Dan; Hughes, Evan; Herod, Brenda F.; Parquet, David; Frazier, Lamar; Denne, Karen; O'Neil, Murray P.; Huddleson, Diann
Cc: Alamo, Joseph
Subject: California Treasurers Calls on Lynch to Immediately Set DA Suspension Date Back to July 1
The state treasurer sent a letter this afternoon to Loretta Lynch.
The treasurer claims in the letter that, by extending DA through Sept. 20th, the PUC could have shifted more than $8 billion to small customers.
He urges Lynch to immediately roll back the date to July 1.
We have started working with large customers to refute the letter.
If you would like a copy of the letter, please send your fax number to Joseph Alamo.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
1,790 |
Subject: Re: SCE SOx Auction
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/4194.
=====================================
Hi. Just make sure we're aware of the Commission's approval as soon as
possible so that we can prepare to make a bid. THanks.
From: Jeff Dasovich on 11/30/2000 02:45 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: SCE SOx Auction
man, do i OWE you a phone call. please don't hold it against me. sort of
well, you know, a little nuts right now. but i will reconnect. i promise.
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 11/30/2000 02:44 PM -----
Mona L Petrochko
11/30/2000 01:07 PM
To: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Marcie Milner/Corp/Enron@ENRON, [email protected]
cc: Paul Kaufman
Subject: SCE SOx Auction
SCE is awaiting a commission order to auction off its SO2 credits. Janel
Guerrero is very interested in this. Please let her know once a final order
is issued. Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron on 11/30/2000
01:05 PM ---------------------------
Janel Guerrero
11/07/2000 04:33 PM
To: Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject:
Thanks for the voice mail/update on SoCal Ed. It makes sense that everything
is moving slowly behind the power issues. Talk with you soon!
=====================================
|
1,791 |
Subject: Re:
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/4264.
=====================================
I love you very much and of course want to be together, but some things need
to be worked out because there's too much depression and pain associated with
those incidents. They have to stop.
I have never been embarrassed to be with you. I'm as proud as can be. I
think that's something coming from within you that you need to work on, but
I'm willing to help.
I don't want to end anything, but we need to fix it, or we'll have have to
end it.
I love you and miss you.
Prentice Sellers <[email protected]>
04/24/2001 10:56 AM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject:
I just wanted to say again that I'm sorry about Friday night. I'm sorry
about the way I acted and it was totally inappropriate. It's also not how I
feel. I don't feel animosity. Sometimes I feel hurt because I feel like
sometimes you're embarassed to be associated with me. But it's not
animosity and I'm sorry that that's the way I expressed it. I love you and
I want us to be together and be happy. I know I have some issues I need to
work on for that to happen and I'm willing to do that. I'd rather do it
with you than alone. If you want to end this relationship, I can't stop
you. But I miss you and my life is very empty without you.
=====================================
|
1,792 |
Subject: nan
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/mba__quant/22.
=====================================
Dear E204-1 and E204-2 Students,
Please find attached a copy of the students assigned to their project teams
for Team Assignment #1 (and #2). There were two students in E204-1 who
had not signed on to a team, and I arbitrarily placed them on the 3-person
teams (so all teams are of size 4 or 5). If this does not work, please let
me know in lecture on Wednesday. Also, one student, Barrett Rangarajan
in E204-1, was signed on to two teams so I left Barrett on the first team
that he was listed with (Team #1) -- let me know if this is in error.
Team Assignment #1 is due on Wednesday/Thursday, April 19/20 by 6 PM
-- they must be submitted in the appropriate lecture for the group as listed
on the attached sheets. Although a Wednesday group may have a Thursday
member, they must turn the paper in on Wednesday. Late penalties will
apply to late papers at the rate of 1-point per day late. Do not rely on the
Haas printer to be available and in working order at 5:45 PM on the due date.
--Tom McCullough
=======================================================================
Tom McCullough
Senior Lecturer
Haas School of Business
University of California at Berkeley
==========================================================================
=====================================
|
1,793 |
Subject: RE: Market Characteristics
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ["aida.o'[email protected]"]
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/2173.
=====================================
In California, all customers can choose--large and small. There are core (small customer) and noncore (industrial customers). Consumption volume differentiates the two. Noncore customes receive cheaper transporation rates.I'm not sure what sort of limitations you're specifically focused on. There are requirements regarding storage requirements (customers must have some storage) and requirements to pay a share of past "stranded costs" caused by the move to competition. And noncore customers on PG&E have more flexibility to buy in-state transportation than customers on SoCal have.
If there's anything else, let me know.
Best,
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: O'Neal, Aida
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 6:54 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: Market Characteristics
Per our conversation, I am trying to put together some data on the status of gas markets in California, Nevada, Colorado, Oklahoma, New Mexico, and Oregon. In particular I need the gas market characteristics in these states. Are the markets open to retail competition for commercial and industrial customers and if so, what are the requirements and are there some limitations. Please E-mail me your response as I will be in Long Beach tomorrow.
Thanks.
Aida
=====================================
|
1,794 |
Subject: Inventory Class Notes Handout/Clarification on TA#2
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/mba__quant/7.
=====================================
Dear E204-1, E204-2 Students,
I have attached a handout on Inventory Management that parallels my
lectures and the readings (but does not cover some models, like MRP
-- Materials Requirement Planning, which is in the reading handout).
This was requested by class rep Erik Magner. I have tried to include
all the square roots as ( ... )1/2 but compare to the formulae in the?readings for accuracy/equivalence.?Regarding Team Assignment #2, "End of Month Cash Balances" refer?to the end of the month AFTER any loan that is needed. The 0.5% interest?is only earned on the end-of-month cash flow BEFORE the loan, however?(0.5% of any pre-loan positive balance is paid to McGan, and McGan pays?the bank 0.5% of any pre-loan negative cash balance -- in addition to the?1% interest charge on any loan needed). McGan's end-of-month?cash balance should be at least $250,000 (after any loan) in any month.?These comments refer to the last two bullet-points of Problem 2, p. 3.?--Tom McCullough? - E204_INV_hndout.doc??=======================================================================?Tom McCullough?Senior Lecturer?Haas School of Business?University of California at Berkeley?==========================================================================
=====================================
|
1,795 |
Subject: Valuable information on DOE's Energy Star program
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/3874.
=====================================
Energy Committee Members:
Below and attached you will find information regarding DOE's software, which
allows network-based activation of sleep mode on computer monitors. Terry
O'Sullivan observed the last meeting of the Energy Committee and believes
this to be valuable information for many of our member companies. If you
would like additional information about this or other program elements,
please contact Terry O'Sullivan (510-482-4421 x223;
[email protected]) and he will be happy to talk with you further.
The EPA is preparing a nationwide campaign to enable the Energy Star sleep
mode function on computer monitors. This campaign will feature DOE's new
public domain software, which allows a system administrator to enable the
sleep mode on computer monitors via the network. The programs author was
very interested in meeting with our group, unfortunately time does not allow
with the increasing urgency of many issues that demand our committee's
attention. However, I did not want you to miss out on this opportunity.
Please take a moment to review the attached information.
Again, please feel free to contact Terry for more information.
Thanks
- DOE autoactivation.PDF
- Energy Solutions.doc
- Off-equip Bullet 3-27.rtf
=====================================
|
1,796 |
Subject: Re: lo
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/10406.
=====================================
Hey Sweetie:
So glad to hear that you're well. Was wondering how you were weathering the
tech melt down. I'm good. Trying to figure out how to plant 10 acres of
grapes on my land in Mendocino (rather have 10 acres of grapes than a place
in S.F., I've decided---what do you think?). I was thinking of taking a pass
on "sunner" school and just going all 6 semesters. Am I stupid? Summer
vacation just sounds so good these days. Leaving Monday for Mexico. Back
Sunday. When you leaving? Definitely miss seeing you. Looking forward to
catching up---hopefully soon. You take care.
Best,
Jeff
Courtney Abernathy <[email protected]>
03/23/2001 06:08 PM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: lo
Jeff-
Haven't talked to you in a while...thanks very much
for the vm you left a couple of weeks ago-very nice to
hear! How are you?
Things are much better for me. Over the newbie hump
at Sun. Goood things happening in general. Usual
fustrations. School is fine-'cept I have to take
dreaded sunner school.
Miss seeing you-how long will you be in Mexico?
C
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
=====================================
|
1,797 |
Subject: RE: Reliant Protective Order
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/1767.
=====================================
You're welcome........per my voice mail, sorry for delay. It's been a Monday, I think Richard Sanders was talking away from the phone, it was hard to hear what he was saying.
Linda
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 3:49 PM
To: Noske, Linda J.
Subject: RE: Reliant Protective Order
Thank you.
-----Original Message-----
From: Noske, Linda J.
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 3:37 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: Reliant Protective Order
Draft of transcribed message from Richard Sanders voice mail (Legal) to Rick Shapiro. Rick forwarded to Jim Steffes.
FYI:
"We have not seen the Reliant Protective Order. It's only been described to me by their General Counsel. And in the way it was described it was a document that we would probably agree to, because there's still some corks(? and provisions over disagreements about the Confidentiality.
So, I'm gonna try to get Mike Kirby to get ahold of it this a.m. in terms of the theme to the Legislators. The question I've got is why haven't we even been offered that same deal? It shows clearly that they're trying to isolate us, and that they're treating us differently from everyone else., but I'm not sure how far that goes....."
=====================================
|
1,798 |
Subject: Re: New Hampshire Continues Restructuring
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/389.
=====================================
Would be useful to know what we (Enron) think about this? A good one, or a
poorly done restructuring. thanks mcs
From: Gavin Dillingham@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 12/09/2000 08:31 CDT
To: joe Hartsoe@ENRON, Sandra McCubbin@EES, Susan Mara@EES, Paul Kaufman@ECT,
Karen Denne@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich@EES, Mark Palmer@ENRON, James D Steffes@EES,
Richard Shapiro@EES, Elizabeth Linnell@EES, Jeannie Mandelker@ECT,
[email protected], Mark Schroeder@ECT, Peter Styles@ECT, [email protected], Mona L
Petrochko@EES, Peggy Mahoney@EES, Nicholas O'Day/AP/Enron@Enron, Mike
Dahlke/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rob Bradley@ENRON, Shelley
Corman@ENRON
cc:
Subject: New Hampshire Continues Restructuring
The New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission (NHPUC) on Friday, September
8th issued orders approving
a restructuring Settlement Agreement which will provide PSNH customers with
significantly lower rates and the ability to choose an energy supplier.
Consumers Utility Cooperative (NHCUC), announced today that it has money
saving electric power for sale for all
commercial, industrial, residential ratepayers, both large and small in New
Hampshire Electric Cooperative (NHEC) territory below the
5.628 cents per kwh standard offer price.
=====================================
|
1,799 |
Subject: Direction to Board Mtg
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/1110.
=====================================
A) From south or west of Walnut Creek
1) Take CA 24 to I-680, then go north; or just take I-680
north, depending on point of origin
2) After passing I-680/CA 24 intersection, begin looking for
Treat Boulevard exit (about third exit, +/- 1)
3) Exit Treat Boulevard, go right (east)
4) go under BART track
5) After BART track, turn right at 2nd light (Jones Road)
6) Very quickly, take first possible right into parking lot
entrance
7) Park underground, bring ticket to office - - we validate.
8) Actual address: 1350 Treat Boulevard, Suite 500.
B) From north or east of Walnut Creek
1) Take I-80 or CA 4 to I-680, then go south
2) Look for Treat Boulevard exit as in 3 above, and follow
same directions
C) BART option
1) Take BART to Pleasant Hill station
2) Walk to office, about 2 blocks:
exit BART station, either side, and walk back toward
SF under the elevated track
go to major intersection, across from Embassy Suites
(Oak and Treat Boulevard)
Look for large, five-story, Coral/Salmon colored
building on large tract of land, southeast corner. Much
construction activity going on around site.
Go to front of building, climb stairs to main
entrance/lobby, enter, take elevator to fifth floor, suite
500.
=====================================
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.