dataset_id
int64 0
5.47k
| email_body
stringlengths 800
9.73k
|
|---|---|
1,800 |
Subject: FW: ThirdAge is acquired
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/2879.
=====================================
I have put in the request with the band and I will let you know what I hear
back. I also told them their would be room to stay there. Mike & Lisa and
Sean & Molly can come. I told them there would be room also. What is our
total limit on people??
Cameron Sellers
Vice President, Business Development
PERFECT.COM
1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210
Palo Alto, CA 94303
[email protected]
650.798.3366 (direct dial)
650.269.3366 (cell)
650.858.1095 (fax)
-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Herring [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2000 2:58 PM
To: Cameron Sellers
Subject: RE: ThirdAge is acquired
We will definitely come! We will get a baby sitter and come for the
weekend, let us know if we should rent a house or condo or something.
I am happy the merger is announced, it has been hurting my
football-picking-ability.
Mike
At 10:40 AM 10/31/00 -0800, you wrote:
>I saw that this morning. Congratulations!!! I assume you are crazily busy
>right now...
>
>Can you guys come for Prentice's 30th birthday party in December? Jeff is
>renting a place in Stinson beach for the weekend of the 15th and 16th. It
>would be great if you guys could come (even for part of it). Let me
know...
>
>Love to you all!!
>
>Cameron
>
>
=====================================
|
1,801 |
Subject: ADV: Power & Water Conference
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/28657.
=====================================
Note:If you do not want to receive notice of any upcoming programs, please
reply to this email with "remove" in the subject line. You also can limit
notices to specific topics by replying and specifying the topics. Thank
you.
Dear Mr. Dasovich,
Power & Water conference: Water is a critical path for every energy project
and this year it has become more important than ever. A new administration
adds yet another complicating factor to the Pacific Northwest's water and
energy uncertainties. This program's distinguished faculty, including
Judity Johansen (now CEO of PacifiCorp) and former Senator Slade Gordon,
will provide insights that will help anyone dealing with water and energy
supply issues to move more surely through these troubled times.
When/Where: August 16 & 17 at the Renaissance Madison Hotel in Seattle.
Program Co-chairs: Randall J. Hardy of Hardy Energy Consulting and
Elizabeth Thomas of Preston Gates & Ellis LLP.
Information or registration: reply to this announcement; call us at (800)
854-8009; or visit our web site:
http://www.lawseminars.com/htmls/seminars/01powa.
--------------------------------------------
Copyright 2001 by Law Seminars International
All Rights Reserved
--------------------------------------------
=====================================
|
1,802 |
Subject: eProcurement Learning Options
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/27852.
=====================================
eProcurement
As previously announced, Corporate and Enron Wholesale Services will use
eProcurement to create and approve purchase requests for IT hardware and
office supplies beginning July 2.
The purpose of this e-mail is to share the available eProcurement learning
options. You decide what option(s) works best for you.
* Houston eProcurement System Demonstrations (1.5 hr overview) Registration
Now Open!
Register at <http://iscedcenter.enron.com>
* Houston eProcurement Requestor Instructor-Led Classes (3 hr hands-on)
Registration Now Open!
Register at <http://iscedcenter.enron.com>
* NEW! Online, Interactive eProcurement Courses Available June 18!
Access Requestor and Approver courses from <http://iscedcenter.enron.com>
* Electronic Quick Reference Cards and Step-by-Step Documentation Available
June 18!
Access from <
http://sap.enron.com/sap_doclib/user/file_list.asp?cabinet_id=205>
Over the next three weeks, you will receive additional information to help
you transition to the new system:
* How iBuyit eProcurement will impact your purchase activities
* Where to get help
* Logon information and quick reference cards
Questions?
For general information about iBuyit, send an e-mail to <<
mailto:[email protected]>>.
=====================================
|
1,803 |
Subject: Re: Draft Declaration
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT', 'Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/4959.
=====================================
Unless you are really comfortable with the allegations, limit your dec. to
facts not hypotheticals. Let the lawyers allege.
From: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON on 03/13/2001 07:53 PM CST
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
To: "Kristen Bird" <[email protected]>
cc: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Draft Declaration
Kristen:
My edits to the declaration.
Best,
Jeff
415.782.7822
"Kristen Bird" <[email protected]>
03/13/2001 05:19 PM
To: <[email protected]>
cc: "Michael Lifrak" <[email protected]>
Subject: Draft Declaration
Jeff,
I am attaching a draft declaration for your review. Please let me know if
you have any comments or changes or if you think we could explain things a
little better. Obviously, if you think we have misrepresented something,
please let me know so that we can correct it. I believe we have most of the
exhibits.
Call me when you have had a chance to review. My direct dial is 213.615.8774.
As I said, we need to file this in support of our Opposition to the
plaintiffs' motion for shortened time, which is due tomorrow. Accordingly,
we would like to have this finalized and signed tonight, if possible. Thanks
Jeff.
Regards,
Kristen
- 0345604.01
=====================================
|
1,804 |
Subject: Next week's call
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/2535.
=====================================
Our last weekly call before the new year will be Monday, December 18. The
following items are on the agenda:
Update on our state licensing strategy
2001 outside services and training budget
2001 EBS Government Affairs meetings
Request for information from the Telecom Hedge Fund
Trade publications that are available to our group
EBS GA database
Identifying terms and concepts you want to know more about
Inaugural events (since it is looking like there will be an inauguration)
Please let me know if there's anything else I should put on the agenda.
Also, I'm attaching (1) a copy of the slides Kevin Hannon and Ken Rice used
at the EBS All-Employee meetings last week, and (2) a list of the types of
information the people at the telecom hedge fund are requesting.
Finally, in case any of you have extra reading time these days, a great book
is Tele-Revolution: Telephone Competition at the Speed of Light by Richard
Tomlinson. It's a great description of the technical, business and
regulatory developments leading up to competition in the local loop, and, in
the words of Lisa Yoho, is "a real page-turner." (Although I wouldn't
necessarily recommend it as a last minute gift idea for friends and family).
It's available from Amazon.com.
=====================================
|
1,805 |
Subject: DAF APPROVAL-local loop with Level 3-San Diego-EBS is buying DS-3,
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/1850.
=====================================
Jeff,
Give me a call on this one. Thanks!
Donald
----- Forwarded by Donald Lassere/Enron Communications on 10/01/00 12:01 PM
-----
Amy Heffernan
09/25/00 04:42 PM
To: Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donald Lassere/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Melissa White/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Rich
Hall/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Gregg Simmons/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Debra Bailey/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Phil Markwart/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Moe
Barbarawi/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Mark Friedman/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Brad Richter/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications
cc: Molly LaFuze/Enron Communications, Joe Edwards/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Neil Carpino/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications
Subject: DAF APPROVAL-local loop with Level 3-San Diego-EBS is buying DS-3,
1 yr, (will be sold to Broadband Delivery Group-EBS)
Please let me know if you approve of this deal.
Thank you!
Amy Degeyter Heffernan Office: 713.853.7646
Enron Broadband Services Cell: 713.962.1520
Trading Support Fax:713.646.3271
[email protected]
=====================================
|
1,806 |
Subject: CPUC Workshop on 4/17
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/4312.
=====================================
Mr. Myers,
My name is Jeff Fawcett. I am a commercial representative of Transwestern=
=20
Pipeline Co. and was its witness during the recent GIR proceedings. Given=
=20
Transwestern's role as one of the principal suppliers of natural gas to the=
=20
State of California, we are very interested in the outcome of these=20
proceedings and offer our assistance to the Commission in its investigation=
.
Much has been discussed in the press recently about pipeline infrastructure=
=20
in California, as well as the upstream capacity of FERC pipes that serve th=
e=20
California marketplace. I know there is much to be covered in the 4/17=20
workshop. However, if the schedule permits, Transwestern would like to off=
er=20
a brief overview of its delivery system to California and its view of the k=
ey=20
issues the Commission and stakeholders face as the investigation moves=20
forward. TW=01,s presentation should take no more than 10-15 minutes.
Please let me know if the Energy Division would like TW to make such a=20
presentation and, if possible, approximately what point during the 9 -4:30=
=20
session Transwestern will be invited to step forward. I=01,m available by=
=20
return email or you may reach me by telephone at 713-853-1521. Thank you.
=====================================
|
1,807 |
Subject: Re: Fw: IEEE Summer meeting
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/3313.
=====================================
Shmuel:
Flattered that you would ask. I should be able to participate. Let's
discuss further. Give me a call. 415.782.7822.
Best,
Jeff
"Shmuel Oren" <[email protected]>
02/19/2001 11:36 AM
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Fw: IEEE Summer meeting
----- Original Message -----
From: "Shmuel Oren" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 10:18 AM
Subject: IEEE Summer meeting
>
> Dear Jeff
> I am Organizing a Panel at the IEEE Summer Meeting in Vancouver July 15-19
> on the California electricity crisis: cause, remedies and prevention. The
> idea is to have different perspectives e.g. operations, market power,
demand
> side response, supply, regulatory etc. I would like to invite you to take
> part in this panel. As someone that was intimately involved in the
> restructuring you could provide an invaluable regulatory and political
> perspective on how did we get into this and how can we get out. At this
> point I have commitments from Fluckiger of the CAISO, Ed Kahn, Ward
Uggerud
> CEO of Otter Tail Power Company, Gary Ackermann, Executive
Director-Western
> Power Trading Forum and I am waiting for a commitment from Vikram Budraja.
>
> Regard, Shmuel Oren
>
=====================================
|
1,808 |
Subject: RE: Legislative Update
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/5.
=====================================
Since the bills that passed are all Burton/Senate bills, it may be the case that a deal has been cut at the leadership level involving 78 and the other energy-related bills (SB 18 in particular). Scott, Hedy, Bev---Can you do a bit of checking to see if this is the case? Thanks very much.
Best,
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Govenar [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 8:32 PM
To: Rick Shapiro; Steffes, James D.; Kaufman, Paul; Jeff Dasovich;
Kingerski, Harry; Lawner, Leslie; Susan J Mara; Hedy Govenar; Bev
Hansen; Mike Day
Subject: Legislative Update
SBX2 78 (Polanco) passed out of the Assembly Appropriations Committee on a
party line vote as amended. I faxed the amendments to Houston and San
Francisco.
SBX2 39 (Speier), which grants the CPUC broad authority over generation
facilities, passed out of the Assembly Energy, Costs and Availability
Committee.
SBX2 18 (Burton), which establishes a dedicated rate component, passed out
of the Assembly Energy, Costs and Availability Committee.
SBX2 85 (Burton), which prevents the CPUC from adopting rate hikes up to or
above levels in effect prior to the imposition of 10% rate reduction, passed
out of the Assembly Energy, Costs and Availability Committee.
=====================================
|
1,809 |
Subject: Re: Growing Coastal Grapes
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/3449.
=====================================
Thanks so much for responding, Sally. Very interested in exploring the
possibilities with you. Greatly appreciated.
Wow, that's the only other Jeff Dasovich I've ever heard of. No kidding.
Referred to you by Lee Green. Don't yet have soil test or temp profiles, but
am in the process of figuring out how to get them done. Any suggestions are
welcome and appreciated. I'll be around the weekend of March 10th. If that
works for you, great; otherwise, we can try another date.
Again, can't thank you enough for responding. I don't know where it'll lead,
but I've got a hunch that it just might work out.
Enjoy drinking your wine (had the syrah recently) and very much look forward
to meeting you.
All the best,
Jeff
Sally Ottoson <[email protected]>
02/28/2001 05:05 PM
Please respond to pacstar
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Growing Coastal Grapes
Hi Jeff:
I know a Jeff Dasovich, exact spelling, an attorney in
Oklahoma City...I'm looking forward to talking to you about
the potential for vineyard. Please call me at 707-964-1155,
I zoom around pretty fast but should be able to get down
there soon. Do you have soil test results/temp profiles -
were you referred to me by Alan Green of Greenwood Ridge? Sally
=====================================
|
1,810 |
Subject: Re: PG&E_Kinert Revision
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/csu_fresno/5.
=====================================
Everyone,
Here is my revision of Rob's letter for discussion on our conf call today at
10:30 am. Could someone pls email me the dial-in info?
Thanks,
AW
Andrew Wu
04/04/2000 02:36 PM
To: Dirk vanUlden/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange
cc: Rob Cone/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange, Jeff
Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Richard Crevelt/Western Region/The Bentley
Company@Exchange, Douglas Huth/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Re: PG&E_Kinert Revision
Dirk--
We're planning a conf call to go over the letter tomorrow at 10:30am CA
time. I will be in Phoenix but I can dial in. Rob Cone is setting up the
meeting. After we get everyone's input we can send the letter out this
week. I'll be in San Antonio from Weds through Fri but available by phone
and email.
AW
From: Dirk vanUlden/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange on 04/04/2000
04:16 PM CDT
To: Andrew Wu/HOU/EES@EES, Rob Cone/Western Region/The Bentley
Company@Exchange
cc: Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Richard Crevelt/Western Region/The Bentley
Company@Exchange, Douglas Huth/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: PG&E_Kinert Revision
Andy, I made a few changes. We'll still need dates and comments from Rob.
Your changes and edits are tremendous. Is it almost ready to go out? Dirk
=====================================
|
1,811 |
Subject: EvMBA New Admits Reception
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/10761.
=====================================
HI Everyone,
As you know, we now have two rounds of admission for the EvMBA Program, and
we have just sent out admission letters to the first round of
applicants. Since there will be so much time between now and when we
contact them about the New Student Orientation, we decided to institute a
New Admits Reception for Round I applicants. These newly admitted students
have not yet accepted our offer of admission, so the purpose of this event
is to "close the deal."
This reception will be held on Thursday, April 19 from 7:00 - 9:00 pm in
the Wells Fargo Room. We cordially invite you to join us in welcoming our
new EvMBA students (we've admitted 55 students in Round I) and to talk with
them about your experience in the program. Many of you on this
distribution list have a class on the night of the reception, so we thought
you might be available to stop by during the break.
We're planning wine and hors d'oeuvres from 7:00 - 8:00 pm, then Rich Lyons
has graciously agreed to give a 1/2 hour talk entitled "New Frontiers in
International Finance." In addition, we've invited faculty and alums to
attend.
We'd greatly appreciate your RSVP to me or Meg St. John (mstjohn@haas) so
that we can make appropriate catering arrangements.
Cheers,
Diane
=====================================
|
1,812 |
Subject: Valuation of GA Activities
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/1283.
=====================================
John/Gia:
You asked that we attempt to evaluate our activities. Working with TW, I've
valued this one.
The California Commission ruled that the "Hector Road" natural gas recent
point in California ought to be made a primary receipt point. This would
have had the effect of TW losing access right to 200 MMcf/d of capacity at
SoCalGas' Needles receipt point.
Best case scenario: Under SFV rates, loss to TW is commodity rates (wash)
and the fuel margin. TW calculates the fuel margin to be $5.8MM/yr.
Bad case: If shippers on TW try to make the case that TW is at fault for
losing the primary access rights, then TW is at risk for the demand component
of the contracts associated with the 200 MMcf/d. TW calculates the demand
charges loss to be $16.5 MM/yr.
Worse case: In addition to actual damages listed above, shippers face
performance penalties and other contractual damages (from their customers)
and they try to pass those costs on to TW.
I discussions with TW, we concluded that the most likely case fell between
"best" and "bad," somewhere in the $12-15MM/yr range.
TW believes that without the assistance of CA Gov't Affairs in the case, the
$12-15 MM/yr would have been lost.
Be happy to discuss with you further.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
1,813 |
Subject: Re: AHP
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/9295.
=====================================
Fellows:
OK, here's the beginning of the memo. I'm still working on it, but work
cratered on me and I have to switch back to that now. I'll have a draft
finished by tomorrow night and I'll redistribute. Couple things.
Check the DuPont. Asset turn needed to be changed, because the pro form
calcs hadn't taken the cash out of the assets. That bumps the ROE up some.
See my attached file, I decompose ROE using an alternative method (Mark, the
one Tasker used in class) just to do a check, and the numbers turn out the
same. I also ran some turnover ratios for AHP and Warner (understanding the
limitations of one year's numbers.)
Questions:
Don't we have to assume that covenants will force AHP to dump its divident
payout? Folks likely to get unhappy about that? Should we care, or should
we just expect a rotation out of the stock by dividend-loving investors and
rotation in by capital-gains loving investors?
Could we persuade the new management to lever up with an argument that with
all that cash on the books, AHP is ripe for takeover?
Anyway just some thoughts. I'll finish it up tomorrow and re-distribute.
Herr Jackson: I haven't had a chance to review your comments, but I'll
incorporate those in tomorrow as well.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
1,814 |
Subject: Electricity/Gas Database Link
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/3876.
=====================================
As promised, attached is the link to the database that my group will soon
roll out. Please keep in mind that this database covers items that are
pertinent to electricity and gas. I want you to get an idea of the sorts of
things that we are keeping up with. As you look at this, please think about
items that we should include in a similar database that would contain
EBS-specific issues.
Also, the electricity/gas database will be used primarily by commercial
groups and is for internal use only. Once populated, the data will need to
be periodically updated.
When you open the database, choose "electricity" on the left side of the
screen (we have not yet populated the "gas" section). Then choose one of the
many topics that appears. Please keep in mind that we are still populating
the data - there are a few categories that do not contain information yet.
Code of Conduct and Environmental are full of information.
http://eesdevel-ln1.ees.enron.com/energyservices/deregulation.nsf/Home+Page/St
art?opendocument
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. It is my hope that
I can address them prior to our next conference call.
Thanks!
Margo Reyna
Regulatory Analyst
Enron Corp., Government Affairs
Phone: 713-853-9191
=====================================
|
1,815 |
Subject: eProcurement is Here!
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/12241.
=====================================
eProcurement
I am pleased to announce the launch of iBuyit eProcurement within Enron=20
Corporate. Many of you are already using eProcurement. Effective today,=
=20
employees throughout Corporate will begin to use eProcurement to purchase I=
T=20
hardware and office supplies. =20
This is a significant milestone in the Enron-wide cost saving effort. This=
=20
new tool enables us to watch our expenses and take advantage of preferred=
=20
suppliers. The use of eProcurement ensures that all of us are spending our=
=20
company dollars wisely. =20
This is only the beginning, and eProcurement has the potential for unlimite=
d=20
growth. Be sure to provide the iBuyit team with feedback to ensure that=20
eProcurement is a valuable and integral tool to your purchase activities.
I encourage you to visit the iBuyit Portal today to logon to eProcurement, =
to=20
access training information and materials, and to learn more about Enron=01=
,s=20
business-wide cost savings opportunities: http://ibuyit.enron.com
Note: To logon enter your User ID (P number) and Password (initial passwor=
d=20
is ENRON1).
Need Help?
Call ISC Customer Care at 713 345 4727.
Questions?
For general information about iBuyit, send an e-mail to <
mailto:[email protected]>. =20
=====================================
|
1,816 |
Subject: RE: Meet
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/891.
=====================================
as far as i'm concerned ted' off the team, period. (we kid!)
Tomorrow's fine with me.
Jacqueline Kelly <[email protected]>
11/07/2000 04:28 PM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, Jacqueline Kelly
<[email protected]>, "'Kimberly Kupiecki'" <[email protected]>,
[email protected]
cc:
Subject: RE: Meet
I agree that we need to get together. I am going to grind out a spreadsheet
tomorrow night. Unfortunately, my friends birthday dinner is Thursday
night. I know Ted is going to be gone for the weekend.
Can we get together tomorrow or over the weekend without Ted? Ted is going
to do some research on the discount rate, which can be dropped in to any
analysis that we come up with.
What do you think?
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2000 2:21 PM
To: Jacqueline Kelly; 'Kimberly Kupiecki'; [email protected]
Subject: Meet
Hey, I know it's a pain, but I think there would be value in getting
together (if folks are available) on Thursday evening from 7-10 with (lots
of) beer and pizza and grind through the finance case. We can do it at my
apartment, or anywhere else you folks would like to do it. Thoughts?
=====================================
|
1,817 |
Subject: Attorneys
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/12159.
=====================================
You get this? Scott said that it bounced back to him the first time.
Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 07/26/2001 07:16 PM -----
"Scott Govenar" <[email protected]>
07/26/2001 06:27 PM
Please respond to sgovenar
To: <[email protected]>, "Susan J Mara" <[email protected]>, "Jeff
Dasovich" <[email protected]>, "Paul Kaufman" <[email protected]>,
"Steven Kean" <[email protected]>
cc: "Hedy Govenar" <[email protected]>
Subject: Attorneys
As we discussed on yesterday's conference call, the following attorneys are
experts on the California Public Records Act, which is the applicable Act
for retrieving information from the California Legislature. The first two
names were provided by the California Newspaper Association (Enron was not
mentioned) and the third name comes from our associate Mark Harris. We
often work with the fourth attorney on other issues and he does have some
experience in this area however he should be used primarily if the other
attorney's do not work out.
Charity Kenyon
Riegels, Campos & Kenyon
(916) 779-7100
Karl Olson
Levy, Ram, Olson & Rossi
(415) 433-4949
Kevin Culhane
Hansen, Boyd, Culhane & Watson
(916) 444-2550
Phil Recht
Mayer, Brown & Platt
(213) 229-9500
=====================================
|
1,818 |
Subject: Re: Democratic National Congressional Election Committe Starts Adds
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/4708.
=====================================
sigh....
Susan M Landwehr
05/22/2001 12:27 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Democratic National Congressional Election Committe Starts Adds
in California
ironic that they will be using our dollars (Linda's office of course gives to
both the RNC and the DNC)
Jeff Dasovich
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
05/22/2001 11:02 AM
To: Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, [email protected], Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron,
Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Karen
Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, [email protected], Susan M Landwehr/NA/Enron@Enron,
Paul Kaufman/Enron@EnronXGate
cc:
Subject: Democratic National Congressional Election Committe Starts Adds in
California
The advocacy ad blitz has started. I don't know if I have the title correct,
but the D.C. based arm of the Democratic National Committee has started an ad
campaign against Republicans (in San Diego I believe). The head of the
committee was quoted this morning as saying something to the effect of, "the
Republicans in Washington aren't doing anything to solve the problem and "we"
want to make sure that they're held accountable."
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
1,819 |
Subject: FERC Meeting in San Diego
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/3226.
=====================================
Hi, Jeff -
Wow, what a wild election. I'm finding it hard to concentrate on
work! But I finally picked up the business section of the UT and saw that
FERC will be coming to San Diego for a meeting on Tuesday, Nov. 14. Will
you be coming down for the meeting? If so, I'd like to meet up with you
for breakfast, lunch or just a quick cup of coffee. I'm sure if you have
time that Jesse Knight will be on your schedule for something similar, so
if you have time to meet, that would be great.
I've been waiting to hear back from Rick Counihan. The last he and I
talked, last Tuesday, he said that ARM had chosen one of the firms in
Sacramento as its first choice, but that budget issues had to be negotiated
before a final decision was made. He said if they couldn't come to an
agreement The Gable Group was the coalition's second choice -- so I'm still
holding out a little hope. If you know of any other coalitions or
companies that are looking for some public relations/media relations
assistance to support their business goals, would you mind please passing
my name to them? I'd really like to jump back on the electricity train.
Let me know if you'll be in town next week. Looking forward to seeing you --
Dana
Dana Perino
The Gable Group
619-234-1300
=====================================
|
1,820 |
Subject: AB 128x Passed
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/12145.
=====================================
The 7 pages of amendments were adopted.? Please check the Assembly Website
tomorrow morning, as the bill should be in print then.
AB 128x passed unanimously from the Assembly policy committee by a vote of
5-0.? Cedillo was not there.? The 2 Republicans did not vote.? Voting for
the measure were Corbett, Alquist, Aroner, Koretz, and Thomson.
Speaking in support of the bill were Jean Ross (CA Budget Project - a
liberal think tank), Lenny Goldberg (who commented that he is "hopeful that
the bill is constitutional"), CalPIRG, CA Labor Federation, and Women's
Energy Group.
Assemblywoman Alquist asked to be a co-author of the bill.? Assemblyman
Wyland said that he believes that consumers are being gouged, but that he
could not vote for this bill.
Speaking in opposition were:? CMTA, Intergen, BP Amoco, California Chamber,
and IEP.
The bill next goes to a hearing at Assembly Appropriations Cmte, scheduled
for next Wednesday (5/16).
However, if the Assembly and/or Senate shuts down the Special Session
tonight (which is the rumor), this bill and SB 1x will die.
Chris Micheli, Esq.
Carpenter Snodgrass & Associates
1201 K Street, Suite 710
Sacramento, CA? 95814
(916) 447-2251
FAX: (916) 445-5624
EMAIL: [email protected]
=====================================
|
1,821 |
Subject: Spring Electives
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/1503.
=====================================
Comrades:
With a view to increasing the knowledge quotient of
the collective student body regarding the spring
electives, the EMBAA and SAC are soliciting the views
of the veterans among us (you know the ones: we are
those who wear eyepatches, prosthetic limbs and mumble
incoherently to ourselves most of the day) who may
have constructive opinions about classes they have
taken at Haas outside the core.
Our hope is to gather, edit and package (that means
make suitable for readers of all ages) these remarks
prior to registration for Spring Semester--which is
week after next, for the schedule-challenged among
us--in order to provide some helpful guidance from our
peers to answer that pesky little question, " What the
heck should I take now!"
Please send your comments to Joe Tambornino,
[email protected], by Tuesday the 5th, and we
will endeavor to supply you with THE UNOFFICIAL GUIDE
TO HAAS SPRING ELECTIVES by the end of the week, which
shall include commentary, course descriptions,
information on new professors, etc.
Thanks very much for your help,
Ken Bruce, president - EMBAA
Joseph Tambornino, chairman - SAC
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Find a job, post your resume.
http://careers.yahoo.com
=====================================
|
1,822 |
Subject: RE: Intention to Challenge the California's PUC's Decision to
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/1648.
=====================================
Jeff, can you set this up, you can coordinate with my admin, Sharon.
Jeremy
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES on 09/22/2001 05:29 PM ---------------------------
From: Jeff Dasovich/ENRON@enronXgate on 09/22/2001 10:15 AM
To: Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: RE: Intention to Challenge the California's PUC's Decision to Suspend DA
Sounds good. Just let me know if you'd like to set up the call, or if you'd like me to do it.
Best,
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Blachman, Jeremy
Sent: Sat 9/22/2001 5:00 AM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Cc:
Subject: Re: Intention to Challenge the California's PUC's Decision to Suspend DA
We must go after this. I need some specific direction with exactly what you would like us to have our clients do. I see this as breaking our market down into the following as each are effected a bit differently:
- a specific alignment with the contracts we signed in August
- those clients we are marketing to, and can't sign a new contract due to the suspension
- existing clients whom we are risk with if there are ANY restrictions on extensions
Suggest that we set-up a call on Mon or Tues. Would like myself, Angela Schwarz, Lamar Frazier, David Cox, Gayle Muench and Michael Mann in attendance
=====================================
|
1,823 |
Subject: FERC 12/15 Order on California Remedies - Reporting Requirements
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/7974.
=====================================
To ensure that we don't miss any of the reporting dates and requirements that
FERC has established, we asked Bracewell & Patterson to prepare a memorandum
laying out the various reporting times and requirements. Andrea Settanni at
Bracewell has reviewed FERC's December 15 order and prepared the attached
memo.
Alan, it is my understanding that you will be responsible for ensuring that
we meet all of these reporting requirements. I will call you to make sure
that we're on track for the first report which is due on January 2.
Please call me if you have any questions.
Sarah
----- Forwarded by Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron on 12/27/2000 02:19 PM -----
"Andrea Settanni" <[email protected]>
12/22/2000 12:32 PM
To: <[email protected]>
cc: "Jeffrey Watkiss" <[email protected]>, "Ronald Carroll"
<[email protected]>
Subject: FERC 12/15 Order on California Remedies - Reporting Requirements
Sarah - Pursuant to your request, attached is a memo summarizing the
reporting requirements. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks.
Andrea M. Settanni
Bracewell & Patterson, L.L.P.
2000 K Street, N.W.
Suite 500
Washington, D.C. 20006-1872
(202) 828-7631 (phone)
(202) 857-2128 (fax)
[email protected]
- california.doc
=====================================
|
1,824 |
Subject: Re: FW: Bilas PD
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/4140.
=====================================
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 11/30/2000 07:51 PM -----
=09Jeff Dasovich
=09Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
=0911/30/2000 04:44 PM
=09=09
=09=09 To: [email protected]
=09=09 cc:=20
=09=09 Subject: Re: FW: Bilas PD
Art:
Here it is. Hope all's well with you and yours.
Best,
Jeff
"The California Public Utilities Commission has a choice. It can adopt the=
=20
same, common sense natural gas policy for Southern California that=01,s bee=
n in=20
place for several years in PG&E's service territory and has worked very wel=
l=20
for consumers. Or it can stick with the status quo, which the industry=20
agrees is at least partially responsible for bottlenecks and high prices in=
=20
California. The proposed decision opts for the status quo. That's not goi=
ng=20
to solve California=01,s natural gas problems, and it=01,s likely to make m=
atters=20
worse in California's electric industry."
=09"Arthur O'Donnell" <[email protected]>
=0911/30/2000 04:36 PM
=09Please respond to aod
=09=09=20
=09=09 To: [email protected]
=09=09 cc:=20
=09=09 Subject: Re: FW: Bilas PD
Yes, email is fine. Sorry about rush; today is deadline. Keep it brief=20
and I'll hold space for you.
Arthur O'Donnell
California Energy Markets
(415) 824-3222, (415) 824-3223 [fax]
=====================================
|
1,825 |
Subject: CA: Activist Pushing Ballot Initiative To Reverse State Utilities
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/2050.
=====================================
Jeff: you sure know how to "grow 'em" out in California!!!!! Sounds like
"fun" for you!!!!! Should we get you some protest signs, a costume, etc. so
you can truly fight this off?????
CA: Activist Pushing Ballot Initiative To Reverse State Utilities>
Deregulation
????Nov. 29, 2000 - The Wall Street Journal (11/29, Smith) reported, "Harvey
Rosenfield, a consumer activist who has made a career of tapping public anger
at corporate interests, is drafting a ballot initiative aimed at reversing <
electricity> deregulation in California. While Mr. Rosenfield has a mixed
record of success with voters, his inflammatory rhetoric in the past has
focused public attention on such issues as rising auto-insurance rates and
quality of care at health maintenance organizations and helped bring about
change." Rosenfield "now expects to tap into widespread indignation over
soaring <electricity costs and impatience with regulators who can't agree
about what is to be done. To get his initiative on the 2002 ballot, Mr.
Rosenfield needs roughly 700,000 signatures on a petition, which he is
expected to accomplish. Mr. Rosenfield also is expected to raise $7 million
for his campaign; he has been able to raise money in the past through
direct-mail solicitations."
=====================================
|
1,826 |
Subject: Fisher CITM Conference on Enabling eBusiness Transformation
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/12536.
=====================================
Dear?Evening MBA Student,
?
CITM's next?all-day conference on enabling eBusiness transformation??will
take place on May 22, 2001 at the Wells Fargo room..The keynote speaker is
Steve Ellis, EVP, Wells Fargo Wholesale Internet Solutions Group. Also on
the agenda: J_rgen Lutz, eProcurement, Bayer AG, and Mark V. Klopp, Managing
Director, Digital Business Ventures, Eastman Chemical Company, Jeffrey
Kristol, Corp. Director E-Business Applications, Danzas AEI Corp, Mark E.
Atkins, President and CEO, Vality Technology, Herbert M. Osher, Vice
President of Product Marketing, Anysoft, and Dr. Aviva Lev-Ari, former
Director of Information Analytics, Perot Systems.
?
We can accommodate a?limited number of?Evening MBA students at the special
discount price of $150instead of the regular $950; if interested?in
attending please e-mail?Ana L. Mota at? [email protected]. For complete
conference information and registration,? visit the?CITM's home page.
?
-- Arie
Arie Segev, Professor and Director
Fisher Center for? Information Technology & Market Place Transformation
Haas School of Business
The University of California
Berkeley, CA 94720-1900
http://haas.berkeley.edu/citm/
Tel: 510-642-4731
Fax: 510-642-2826 (Alternate: 510-642-4700)
=====================================
|
1,827 |
Subject: RE: FW: SoCalGas Capacity Forum
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/5163.
=====================================
Very, very busy. I thought I was leaving Sempra-land for some well deserved
sanity...no such luck. When I look at what the politicians, regulators and
inept utility executives have accomplished here in California it just
staggers me. A friend of mine who is the Senior Advisor for USAID in the
Caucasus tells me that people are just incredulous that the most significant
state in the most powerful country in the world is facing black-outs.
Perhaps we need to send Loretta to Kazakhstan.....
Other than that, PG&E-land is interesting. Lots of smart, nice people.
Some very motivated, many not. More like a utility than Sempra. If I'd
only taken that job with Natural Gas Clearinghouse in 1990......of course if
I did, I be living in some very nice but miserable town in Texas instead of
God's country (as Florio calls SFO). Still remodeling at home, but I'm a
long way from being finished. Keeping busy and trying to keep perspective
on things.
How about you ? Haven't heard anyone complain about Jeff in some
time.....Let's do lunch sometime.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 5:49 PM
To: Cherry, Brian
Subject: Re: FW: SoCalGas Capacity Forum
Greetings. How's things?
=====================================
|
1,828 |
Subject: first draft of FCC top ten list
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/12504.
=====================================
This is Dynegy's first draft of a top 10 wishlist to give to the head of the
Common Carrier Burueau at the FCC. She specifically requested that the list
be limited to win-win proposals. Let's plan to discuss on the 11:00 call.
Sue Nord, Sr. Director
Government Affairs
713 345-4196
----- Forwarded by Sue Nord/NA/Enron on 06/18/2001 08:15 AM -----
[email protected]
06/15/2001 05:09 PM
To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected]
cc:
Subject: first draft of FCC top ten list
Attached is my first draft of comments - top ten list of needs to promote
bandwidth trading. THis has not benn circulated around DYN yet, so there's
nothing official about it yet. Please look over and let me know your
thoughts. Steve Augustino provided some of the bullets. Have a great
weekend.
(See attached file: FCC white paper for BW trading 061201.doc)
Ed Ross
Sr. Director and Regulatory Counsel
713.767.8428
[email protected]
- FCC white paper for BW trading 061201.doc
=====================================
|
1,829 |
Subject: Re: Conference Call on Interconnection Agreements-Internal
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/4686.
=====================================
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 12/13/2000 12:58 PM -----
Richard Anderson@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
12/13/2000 09:07 AM
To: Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Scott Bolton/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Sue Nord/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: Conference Call on Interconnection Agreements-Internal
Regrettably, I am tied up in another meeting from 1:45 to 3:30 PST today.
Could we reschedule the second part of this meeting to a later time or date?
Thanks,
Richard D. Anderson
Director of Taxes
Enron Broadband Services, Inc.
713-345-7729 (Houston office through 12/15, no voice mail)
503-886-0335 (Portland office and messages)
503-425-6005 (fax)
[email protected]
Mona L Petrochko@ENRON
12/12/00 03:21 PM
To: Sue Nord/NA/Enron@Enron, Scott Bolton/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Anderson/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications
cc:
Subject: Conference Call on Interconnection Agreements-Internal
It seems that 2 p.m. p.s.t. works best for all for a conference call. The
call-in number is 888-311-9051 passcode is 60396.
The agenda would be to discuss:
1. interconnection agreements
2. tax implications of c-corp vs. llp
=====================================
|
1,830 |
Subject: X22480.DOC
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/3531.
=====================================
DA coalition's leg language. Letter supporting Bilas from subset of
coalition. Coalition list to follow.
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/06/2001 04:29 PM -----
MDay <[email protected]>
03/06/2001 12:14 PM
To: "'Harry Kingerski'" <[email protected]>, "'Jeff Dasovich Enron SF'"
<[email protected]>, "'Jim Steffes, Enron'" <[email protected]>, "'Leslie
Lawner, Enron'" <[email protected]>, "'Sandi McCubbin Enron SF'"
<[email protected]>, "'Sue Mara at Enron SF'" <[email protected]>
cc: "'Bev Hansen, Enron lobbyist'" <[email protected]>, "'Scott Govenar,
Enron lobbyist'" <[email protected]>
Subject: X22480.DOC
<<X22480.DOC>>
Here is the redraft of the SB 27X amendments based on the input of the
direct access coalition yesterday. The major thrust of the bill is to allow
customers to switch to direct access as easily as possible (without an exit
fee) when ever there is "headroom" between DWR's firm contracts and total
demand including recent load growth. Once that free DA capacity is used up,
customers can still elect for DA, but must pay the exit fee. All customers
will be on the hook for the financing costs they benefitted from while
taking DWR procured power before they switch to DA.
- X22480.DOC
- BILASALT.DOC
=====================================
|
1,831 |
Subject: RE: Information On Less than 20 KW Customers for Submission to PUC
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/1054.
=====================================
Spoke with Evan Hughes and he is on point.
Thanks - Dan
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 5:54 PM
To: Blachman, Jeremy; Dietrich, Janet; Schwarz, Angela; Frazier, Lamar; Hughes, Evan; Leff, Dan
Cc: Steffes, James D.; '[email protected]'
Subject: Information On Less than 20 KW Customers for Submission to PUC Tomorrow and to Maintain ESP Registration In California
Greetings:
As part of the PUC's inquiry into EES/EEMC, the PUC wants to know how many accounts we have that are less than 20 KW, including all residential and commercial customers. That information is due tomorrow at the Commission.
To keep our ESP registration current in California, we must give the PUC a security deposit (surety bond, or like instrument) by the end of this week. The size of the deposit is determined by the number of customers we have that are less than 20KW (both residential and commercial).
So we need the information to submit to the PUC by 10 AM (PST) tomorrow, and we need it ASAP to get our security desposit to the PUC by the end of the week to keep our registration current.
We need to identify the person that can gather this information quickly. Any thoughts on who that person might be? Appreciate the help.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
1,832 |
Subject: RE: No Road?
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/410.
=====================================
Can you get in touch w/Eldon? I've been unsuccessful the last two days. May
be too late at this point. I was supposed to get in touch with Jeff
beginning of the week so that he could order gravel. And haven't even talked
to him about the culvert. If he does the culvert, Eldon's going to have to
make sure that the other people on the road don't have a fit about Eldon
"re-designing" the road right around the Dome (which fixing the culvert will
entail).
Nancy Sellers <[email protected]>
09/28/2000 10:39 AM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc: "'Eldon Sellers'" <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: No Road?
We did want to get the road done - I'm a little unsure by what you mean about
the wood. Is there someone we could hire to do that?
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [SMTP:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 8:16 AM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: No Road?
Eldoni:
I'm assuming, since I haven't heard back, that we're going to take a pass
this time on the Dome road, and perhaps have Jeff Green do it another time?
If I'm incorrect, we'll need to get things squared away, like today.
Let me know,
Jeff
=====================================
|
1,833 |
Subject: FW: President's Findings & DOE Order
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/5773.
=====================================
fyi
> Attached below are electronic copies of the President's memorandum and the
> Secretary of Energy's Order, which we just received, directing PG&E's gas
> suppliers to keep selling gas to PG&E.
>
> The President's memorandum includes two sentences that appear in
> crossed-out form in the electronic copy attached below. These two
> sentences do NOT appear in the final copy signed today by President
> Clinton, a copy of which we received by facsimile from DOE. The excised
> text would have kept the President's emergency findings in effect for 120
> days, as PG&E requested. But the final text, which bears President
> Clinton's signature, does not include that ruling. (showing us a
> last-minute change made in the White House.)
>
> The short duration of these orders comes as something of a disappointment.
> But we have made history here. Never before has the Defense Production
> Act been used to address an energy supply shortfall. And, the Natural Gas
> Policy Act emergency powers upon which the President and Secretary also
> rely have never been invoked before at all.
>
> Now the work begins of contacting the gas suppliers.
>
> <<President's FindingsRevised.doc>> <<GasOrder.revised.doc>>
>
>
- President's FindingsRevised.doc
- GasOrder.revised.doc
=====================================
|
1,834 |
Subject: Re: ICA memo
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/8166.
=====================================
I think this is a great document to circulate to the larger group. Thanks.
Jeff Dasovich
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
01/03/2001 05:05 PM
To: Sue Nord/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: ICA memo
I forwarded this to you so that you could have a chance to take a peek at it
before forwarding along to the rest of the group. If you'd like me to
forward it along to the larger group, just let me know.
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 01/03/2001 05:02 PM -----
Jeff Dasovich
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
01/03/2001 03:28 PM
To: Sue Nord/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: ICA memo
Hi Sue:
A very happy new year to you. Mr Kean has had me underwater since last
Thursday night, but I'll resurface tomorrow, at which time we can catch up on
a number of things, including bills. But I wanted to forward along Steve's
memo that we discussed just prior to Xmas. Hope you had a great holiday and
that all is well.
Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 01/03/2001 03:25 PM -----
"Stephen P. Bowen" <[email protected]>
01/03/2001 03:17 PM
Please respond to stevebowen
To: Jeffrey Dasovich <[email protected]>
cc: Jeremy Meier <[email protected]>
Subject: ICA memo
- ICA Overview Memo final.doc
=====================================
|
1,835 |
Subject: PG&E Advice Letter Re Schedule E-Gen -- Changing PX Credit
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/11709.
=====================================
On April 11, 2001, PG&E filed Advice Letter 2101-E in which it proposes a
new rate schedule -- "Schedule E-Gen -- Generation Component Unbundling".
Therein PG&E proposes that total generation charges be comprised of two
parts -- (1) charges for power provided by DWR and (2) other generation
charges. The DWR charges will be determined the multiplying the percentage
of sale serve by DWR by germination charges base on the rates terms and
conditions of each electric rate schedule. The other generation consists of
QFs and other purchase power agreement costs and the costs of PG&Es
remaining generation plants as well as any charges received from the ISO
relating to real time energy purchase costs.
In relation to this, as part of the just concluded rate design proceeding,
PG&E has proposed in its testimony to eliminate Schedule PX and "replace
energy charges derived based on the schedule with generation charges."
When cross-examined, the witness clarified that what they proposed in Advice
2101-E (Schedule E-Gen) would be the replacement for Schedule PX. Thus,
apparently, Schedule E-Gen will be the basis for determining the direct
access credit.
If we want to protest this advice filing along the lines of the SCE one, we
must do so Tuesday May 1st.
Jeanne Bennett
=====================================
|
1,836 |
Subject: Fwd: final incident report -- Oct. 17 suspicious substance
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/794.
=====================================
>Monday, October 22, 2001
>
>To: The Haas School Community
>
>From: Pete Dietrich, MD, MPH
> Medical Director, University Health Services
>
>On October 17, 2001 a specimen of powder was collected from the mail
>processing area of the Haas School of Business and sent to the California
>Department of Health Services laboratory for testing. The final results of
>the testing done on this powder revealed no evidence of any harmful
>substance. As a result, we conclude that there is no health concern
>whatsoever and specifically, no anthrax spores were detected. As with most
>unknown materials submitted for analysis, the actual identity of the
>material may never be definitively determined.
>
>The recent events around the country have generated a lot of
>understandable anxiety, but to date, there have been no confirmed cases of
>anthrax in the State of California. As with this incident, strong
>teamwork, continued vigilance tempered with common sense will be important
>as we face the challenges of the future.
>
>If you have any questions you may contact:
>
> Environment, Health & Safety 642-3073
> University Health Services 642-1814
>
>Additional information is available at the University Health Services web
>site at www. uhs..berkeley.edu.
=====================================
|
1,837 |
Subject: Discussion sheet for QF contract restructuring
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/3893.
=====================================
Jeff,
Understanding there are many nuances and directions for discussing a contract
restructuring with the QFs, I am attaching a general outline of a potential
structure we (Chris Foster and I) would like to pitch to Wheelabrator.
Could you look this over and provide your initial comments. I have thought
of providing more specific terms in regards to sharing % and potential up
front payments for the optionality but would like you input. For example, we
could apply an option value to the deal. In Wheelabrator's case, the
intrinsic reverse toll (ie our ability to provide market based power to the
IOU using SRAC at 9210 HeatRate) is in the range of $4-5 MM for the Malin gas
pricing and $9-11 MM if we assume the combined Socal/Malin curve. If we
lower the contract heat rate to 8500 the intrinsic value drops about $2 MM.
The other alternative, which may be the easiest to sell, is to just agree
with the IOU/PUC on a lower heat rate and the Malin curve.
Another value upside, and probably the highest value in the short run, is to
be able to optimize the QF contract deliverability obligations. (ie. in a
very simplified case, if the obligation is only 80 percent, then deliver 80
%).
I will give you a call or call me when you have a free moment.
=====================================
|
1,838 |
Subject: Re: Non payment by PG&E for Negative Charges
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/8286.
=====================================
I assume this will be discussed at tomorrow's meeting.
JMB <[email protected]> on 01/11/2001 03:30:42 PM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>
Subject: Non payment by PG&E for Negative Charges
As you are aware, PG&E has stopped paying all ESPs (who do consolidated
billing) as well as all Direct Access customers who are billed by PG&E the
amounts owed as a result of negative charges accumulating due to high PX
prices. We have spoken with the representatives of a number of ESPs --
Green Mountain, NewWest, APS Energy -- who are highly concerned about this
and are considering action in the form of a complaint filed at the CPUC. We
do not know, however, whether/when they will do such, and whether any relief
afforded would be sufficient to cover other ESPs not named as complainants.
Recognizing that Enron has relationships with PG&E on may different fronts,
we realize that it may not be in its best interest to file a complaint
against PG&E at this time. We will not proceed on any form of official
complaint against PG&E, until we hear differently from you
Mike Day
Jeanne Bennett
=====================================
|
1,839 |
Subject: Final date and time, we have competition
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/1468.
=====================================
All,
A few of you might have been testifying at the FERC hearings in San Diego, I
know Jeff was, so you know that most people wanted FERC to "do something."
The
silver lining in that proposal is that our conference becomes more important.
Lee has decided on 12:30 to 6 pm on Monday November 13 so you can tell any
speakers you are inviting. I think that's the best choice because it more
interesting to more people, and if they can do presidential debates in 2 hours
we should be able to address these issues in 6 hours.
Note that we have competition with another conference, see below. We should
be
able to get better, higher profile speakers. We need to get a list soon so we
can send out advertisements. Please send updates to Lee and me. Expect
another
message asking for reactions to a proposed next set of speakers to invite. If
you want to be on a voluntary conference call addressing the next speakers,
followed by an even more optional discussion on logistics with Heather, tell
me
if Monday 9/18 at 5pm EDT/2 pm Pacific works for you.
Lee, if you want to send this to the other potential sponsors you're talking
to,
feel free.
Thanks!
Rob
<<PMW conference.pdf>>
Rob Gramlich
PJM Market Monitoring Unit
(610) 666-4291
[email protected]
- PMW conference.pdf
=====================================
|
1,840 |
Subject: FW: Need Help
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/1010.
=====================================
Jeff and Sandi -- Enron does so much in so many places I thought you might
be interested in Wendy's resume. She's a star. Karen
-----Original Message-----
From: Mitchell, Wendy [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2000 2:35 PM
To: Karen Edson Edson + Modisette (E-mail)
Subject: Need Help
Karen-
I have attached a copy of my resume. I don't know if you were aware or not
but I am looking to pursue a position in Los Angeles. I have spent the
first 8 years of my professional life working in Sacramento and I believe
now is a good time for me to explore other options. I am very interested in
working in Government Relations in the private sector. I would also be
interested in working in the Energy area. Obviously I am no expert but I do
an elementary grasp of the issue. If any of the IEP member companies were
looking for someone I would very much appreciate you forwarding my resume.
Please call me if you have any questions or want to talk further. I am in
the office through Wednesday and available by cell phone 916-601-4907 the
remainder of this week and next. I will be in Los Angeles the week of the
23rd on interviews. Feel free to call me.
I appreciate anything you can do.
Wendy <<mitchellresume7.19.doc>>
- mitchellresume7.19.doc
=====================================
|
1,841 |
Subject: FW: AReM Planning Meeting
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/1714.
=====================================
Jennifer,
I thought I should ask Jeff Dasovich to attend for us. Jeff, please be on your good behavior! He will try to be there if he can. He used to work for Kathleen at Enron, by the way.
-----Original Message-----
From: Chamberlin, Jennifer A (jnnc) [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 12:02 PM
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: AReM Planning Meeting
Since I've gotten a couple questions about this today....just a reminder,
AReM is holding an in person planning meeting on Monday November 19. We plan
to start about 10 am (although a couple members won't be able to arrive
until 10:30).
The meeting will be held at 345 California St, 32nd Floor. You can just come
up to our floor (no additional security measures in the lobby), reception
will have you sign in and tell you how to get to the conference room. The
meeting is likely to run until mid-afternoon.
We have not put together a formal agenda - but we plan to discuss AReM
strategy and focus for next year. If you will not be able to attend, but
would like to float concerns, positions etc - please go ahead and circulate
them by Monday morning and I'll make sure they are discussed (ie get copies
to anyone who couldn't access their email prior to the meeting).
See you Monday
Jennifer
=====================================
|
1,842 |
Subject: FW: revised stip staying Energy Credit proceedings
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/11344.
=====================================
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 04/20/2001 03:19 PM -----
MDay <[email protected]>
04/20/2001 03:08 PM
To: "'Jeff Dasovich Enron SF'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: FW: revised stip staying Energy Credit proceedings
Here is the revised stipulation. Be advised that Dan Douglas is still
trying to modify it further to ensure we are paid on the basis of recorded
ISO settlements numbers instead of forecasts. Mike
-----Original Message-----
From: JBennett
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2001 7:45 AM
To: MDay
Subject: FW: revised stip staying Energy Credit proceedings
-----Original Message-----
From: Read, Charles [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2001 7:34 AM
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: revised stip staying Energy Credit proceedings
Jeanne: here is a revised stip that incorporates your requested language
regarding parties' rights to contest the advice filing. I couldn't get the
track changes to work accurately so I will just tell you there are not
changes except for your paragraph which is the fourth from the last in the
document. Let me know if this is now acceptable to Enron for filing. (I am
still waiting to get APS' sign-off as well.)
<<STIP STAYING PROCCEDINGS_v1.DOC>>
- STIP STAYING PROCCEDINGS_v1.DOC
=====================================
|
1,843 |
Subject: FYI--DSL Economics
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/4273.
=====================================
----- Forwarded by Sue Nord/NA/Enron on 12/05/2000 09:42 AM -----
James D Steffes
12/04/2000 06:18 PM
To: Sue Nord/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: DSL Economics
FYI. Information from EBS on DSL Economics.
At prices under $50/month (for DSL and ISP service), the article says that
payback is only 12 months [Don't follow this necessarily because $600 first
year Capex with only $600 of fees].
Clearly if you add on installation and potentially internal wiring fixes
(moving a phone jack to the TV set) this only makes it harder to work.
Also, interesting to note that Cable Modems are at least 10x faster than ADSL
(why not go that route)?
Jim
----- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 12/04/2000 06:10 PM -----
Rita Hartfield@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
12/04/2000 11:07 AM
To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Anthony Mends/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
Subject: DSL Economics
Jim, attached is a summary of the ADSL market including the required capital
expenditures required per subscriber.
If you have any additional questions, please call me at ext. 35854.
Rita Hartfield
Phone: 713-853-5854
Cell: 713-304-5428
Fax: 713-646-8861
[email protected]
=====================================
|
1,844 |
Subject: Re: Symposium
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/1599.
=====================================
Jeff
Good to hear from you. I arrive Sunday and depart Wed morning. On Mon there
is the symposium and on Tuesday late morning I address a Berkeley seminar.
Could be free Tuesday afternoon if we don't get sufficient time to talk
Monday.
Regards
Stephen
----- Original Message -----
From: <[email protected]>
To: Stephen Littlechild <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 6:34 PM
Subject: Re: Symposium
>
> Thank you for the note. I'm very much looking forward to meeting you, and
> hope that you can visit the office while your hear to discuss California.
> How long will you be visiting?
>
> Best,
> Jeff
>
>
>
> "Stephen Littlechild"
> <[email protected] To:
<[email protected]>
> net.co.uk> cc: "Stephen
Littlechild"
>
<[email protected]>
> 11/10/2000 12:27 PM Subject:
Symposium
>
>
>
>
>
> Dear Jeff
>
> I understand from Mark Schroeder tha you will be on the Berkeley panel
> after mine. I look forward to meeting you and learning more about the
> present situation there. You could contact me at my hotmail address this
> weekend if you needed to.
> regards
> Stephen Littlechild
>
>
=====================================
|
1,845 |
Subject: RE: Counterproposal to PG&E September 24, 1999, OFO Settlement Of
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/45.
=====================================
Thank you for the summary. ORA's proposed language under the cost
recovery section:
Cost Recovery
- Revise Section B.3 (now B.4) to eliminate the last sentence and
add the following "While PG&E may seek recovery of these costs, other
parties to this settlement do not necessarily support PG&E's right to
recover any additional costs."
-----Original Message-----
From: Yoo, Salle [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, October 04, 1999 11:23 AM
To: Andy Skaff; Ben Ledene; Bob Shively; Catherine Sullivan; Craig
Chancellor; Ed Yates; Edward O'Neill; Gerald Worster; Grant Kolling;
Greg Bloom; Gregory Klatt; James Weil; Jamie Ramierez; Jay Cattermole;
Jeff Dasovich; Joe Paul; John Leslie; Katie Elder; Keith McCrea; Lindsey
How-Downing; Marcel Hawiger; Mark Baldwin; Mark Pocta; Matt Brady;
Michael Rochman; Norm Pedersen; Paul Amirault; Raveen Maan; Rich Hall;
Ron Oechsler; Tom Solberg
Subject: Counterproposal to PG&E September 24, 1999, OFO Settlement
Offer
The enclosed document is a summary of changes to PG&E's September 24, 1999
OFO settlement offer, as proposed by parties during the telephone conference
last Friday (October 1, 1999). We intend to offer this counterproposal to
PG&E at the October 5th settlement conference.
<<Counterproposal to PG1_.doc>>
- att1.htm
=====================================
|
1,846 |
Subject: DO YOU FEEL SORRY FOR PG&E
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/1741.
=====================================
The following is a summary of PG&E's CTC recovery:
So do you still feel sorry for PG&E. Through July 2000, PG&E ratepayes have
paid for $3.9 billion in CTCs and PG&E shareholders face the risk of $1.1
billion. Even if the ratepayers number gets reduce to $2.5 billion and the
shareholders number increases to $2.5 billion, should Californians feel bad
that they paid off half of PG&E's CTCs in exchange for frozen rates through
2001? Although procurement costs are increasing, so are generation revenues
for hydro, nuclear, and QF contracts. Additionally, what is the correct
value of hydro and nuclear assets. If nuclear and hydro are valued correctly
and PG&E locks in next years prices, perhaps PG&E's shareholder may only be
at risk for $0 to 1 billion? Would an 80/20 split between ratepayers and
shareholders for CTC liability be unreasonable? Afterall, (1) PG&E has
delayed hydro valuation with its antics when they expected to overcollect
CTCs, (2) PG&E has been requesting astonishing increases to its T&D rates
which has resulted in squeezing headroom, and (3) PG&E chose the timing and
its assets to divest without hedging the risks; not to mention things like
irresponsibly telling customers to expect rate decreases despite their GRC
request.
Roger
=====================================
|
1,847 |
Subject: Re: Info request
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/9151.
=====================================
I'd send to Leff for distribution.
Karen Denne
02/12/2001 03:52 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Info request
Any idea who this would go to?
---------------------- Forwarded by Karen Denne/Corp/Enron on 02/12/2001
03:48 PM ---------------------------
From: Cindy Derecskey on 02/12/2001 08:52 AM
To: Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject:
----- Forwarded by Cindy Derecskey/Corp/Enron on 02/12/2001 08:51 AM -----
"M. Kavanaugh" <[email protected]>
02/10/2001 12:04 PM
Please respond to kavanaughm
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject:
Hello, and thank you for taking time to answer my question.
Your company was recently awarded $1,650,000 from a project called AB 970
(Demand Responsiveness Program) from the California Energy Commission. I
have read the simple paragraph of the overall concept of the program.
But,can you please provide me specifics on what you plan to do with that
money?
I am also looking for information that you can provide concerning if you
will be working with a company named Conectisys Corp with regards to this
program and two way communications devices or advanced metering devices.
Thank you for you time with this matter.
Sincerely,
Michael Kavanaugh
[email protected]
=====================================
|
1,848 |
Subject: CEC Public Interest Energy Research (PIER) Program
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/3933.
=====================================
The CEC receives approximately $62 million a year from he public goods
charge for RDD.? The area of focus include: (1) RDD that advance science and
technology, (2) RDD activities not adequately provided by competitive and
regulated markets, (3) in-state (ie. California) benefits, and (4) which are
energy related that impact end-use efficiency, environmentally preferred
advance generation technologies, renewable technologies, and other strategic
research.
?
The CEC is reconvening its Public Interest Energy Research (PIER) Advisory
Committee.? As an advisory committee member, I on behalf of IEP, have a
unique opportunity to integrate into the PIER planning process research
ideas, concepts, etc. that could potentially?benefit our industry.? For
example, during past PIER Advisory Committee meetings I urged them to pursue
technologies that would help predict when wind speeds, volumnes, etc. to
assist intermittent wind technologies in scheduling.? This concept grew into
a signficant CEC grant to conduct this type of research.
?
If you have ideas for public interest RDD that you wish to share, please
draft a brief statement of the idea, how/why it would help, etc., and email
it back to me.? I will attempt to pursue them at the CEC for funding.?
?
=====================================
|
1,849 |
Subject: Fwd: Calif State Senate Passes Windfall Profits Tax Bill
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['Deanna King" <[email protected]', '[email protected]', 'Dan Watkiss', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/3558.
=====================================
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Tue, 08 May 2001 08:52:01 -0500
From: "Tracey Bradley" <[email protected]>
To: "Justin Long" <[email protected]>, "Paul Fox" <[email protected]>
Cc: "Deanna King" <[email protected]>, "Dan Watkiss"
<[email protected]>, "Ronald Carroll" <[email protected]>
Subject: Calif State Senate Passes Windfall Profits Tax Bill
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
FYI
Calif State Senate Passes Windfall Profits Tax Bill
Monday, May 07, 2001 08:48 PM ET
LOS ANGELES -(Dow Jones)- The California state Senate passed a measure Monday
that would place a windfall-profits tax on sales of electricity into the
state's wholesale electricity market.
The bill, SB1X, sponsored by state Sen. Nell Soto, D-Ontario, passed the
Senate by a vote of 25-12. The legislation will now be sent to the Assembly.
The legislation would require state regulators to set a base price for
wholesale electricity sold in California and generators would be taxed at
100% above the base price for power sales that exceed that amount, according
to the legislation.
(This story was originally published by Dow Jones Newswires)
Copyright (c) 2001 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
All Rights Reserved
=====================================
|
1,850 |
Subject: FW: memo re executive orders
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/5370.
=====================================
Attached is a memo from Andy Brown (Ellision & Schneider) summarizing the
Governor's recent Executive Orders.
?
-----Original Message-----From: Andy Brown [mailto:[email protected]]Sent:
Friday, February 09, 2001 12:56 PMTo: Steven Kelly (E-mail); Katie Kaplan
(E-mail); Julee Malinowsky-Ball (E-mail); Douglas Kerner; Carol Hudson
(E-mail)Subject: memo re executive ordersImportance: High
attached.? call if questions.? ABB
Andrew B. BrownEllison, Schneider & Harris, LLP2015 H StreetSacramento, CA?
95814Phone: (916) 447-2166Fax: (916) 447-3512mailto:[email protected]
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:? This communication and any accompanying document(s)
are confidential and privileged.? They are intended for the sole use of the
addressee.? If you receive this transmission in error, you are advised that
any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in
reliance upon the communication is strictly prohibited.? Moreover, any such
inadvertent disclosure shall not compromise or waive the attorney-client
privilege as to this communication or otherwise.? If you have received this
communication in error, please contact the sender at the internet address
indicated or by telephone at (916)447-2166. Thank you.
?
- 010209_IEP_EO_abb_analysis.doc
=====================================
|
1,851 |
Subject: Re: California
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/35.
=====================================
been on vacation. i'm back. would you like me to call?
Tom Chapman@ECT
08/21/2000 07:19 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: California
Jeff-
This is a guy from South Carolina who works with a bunch of industrial
customers there. At the last GridSouth meeting, he cornered Joe Connor and I
and asked us about California and the price spikes there. I told him a bunch
of reasons why the price spikes happened, but it appears that he wants more
information.
I would appreciate it if you would call him or if you could find someone else
out there in CA to give him a call. He is not super sophisticated, but he is
the representative of some big clients, so I try to keep him happy. [I think
he represents Michelin and Nucor steel--two huge energy users in South
Carolina.]
Thank you very much.
Tom Chapman
---------------------- Forwarded by Tom Chapman/HOU/ECT on 08/21/2000 07:16
PM ---------------------------
"Bob Knight" <[email protected]> on 08/21/2000 12:54:30 PM
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: California
Tom
Do you have a contact in California that I can continue my questioning about
the situation out there?
Bob Knight
Brett Public Relations
864-239-0616 Greenville
803-765-1955 Columbia
803-608-4207 mobile
- Bob Knight.vcf
=====================================
|
1,852 |
Subject: Nevada to examine electric deregulation timetable.
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ["nicholas.o'[email protected]", '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/california_crisis__press/11.
=====================================
USA: Nevada to examine electric deregulation timetable.
?
09/06/2000
Reuters English News Service
(C) Reuters Limited 2000.
?
?
SAN FRANCISCO, Sept 6 (Reuters) - The timetable for deregulation of Nevada's
electricity market will be examined at a special meeting Sept. 13, called by
Gov. Kenny Guinn (R) with state Public Utilities Commission (PUC) Chairman
Don Soderberg, a spokesman for Guinn said Wednesday.
Nevada's electricity market was to open to competition last March but Guinn
delayed the timing because final rules weren't in place.
?
The state's new timetable now calls for deregulation to be phased in for
various classes of utility customers from Nov. 1, 2000, for big industrial
companies, to residential consumers by the end of 2001.
Soderberg told Reuters the timetable is subject to the governor's approval.
"I have no indication that he is uncomfortable with the schedule, but we will
meet to discuss all issues on deregulation," he said.
The state PUC has studied the power problems Nevada's neighbour California
has grappled with since electricity deregulation went into effect in 1998.
Soderberg said, however, that California's problems, which are based mainly
on supply and demand factors, don't necessarily mean that Nevada will delay
further.
=====================================
|
1,853 |
Subject: 2001 Internal Communications Survey
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/12108.
=====================================
We'd like you to fill out this survey about Enron's Corporate Internal=20
Communications programs. Why? Because our job is to advance your job by=
=20
providing internal communications tools and information that will help you=
=20
work more effectively. And don=01,t worry. The survey is confidential.
How can you be assured that completing this survey is not a waste of your=
=20
time?
1. We will post all of the numerical results on Enron's corporate intranet=
. =20
(Probably not the individual comments, though, because that would be way to=
o=20
much to read!)
2. Our programs are based on what you want, so we need your feedback to=20
assess how we're meeting your needs and where we can make improvements.
The survey will only take you about ten minutes or less, honest. Thanks fo=
r=20
participating.
Please click on the link below.
http://etcsurvey.corp.enron.com/wi/p0639782/i.asp?r=3D27660&s=3DRTWTMEOW&l=
=3D9
Experiencing technical problems? If this link does not automatically launc=
h=20
the questionnaire:
1. Launch by copying the link above into your browser, or
2. If you continue to have technical difficulties, please send an email=20
message to [email protected]
3. Please do not forward this link to anyone else, as it is unique for eac=
h=20
respondent
=====================================
|
1,854 |
Subject: nan
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/8879.
=====================================
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 02/06/2001 11:39 AM -----
JMB <[email protected]>
02/06/2001 11:28 AM
To: "Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)" <[email protected]>
cc: MBD <[email protected]>
Subject:
On January 26, 2001, the Commission voted out an order which "suspends",
effective as of that date, all penalties that companies on interruptible
programs could incur as a result of failing to cut back on electricity when
called to do so by the UDC. By suspension, the commission means that the
appropriate portions of the tariffs are withdrawn. As a result, the UDCs
will not bill customers for penalties nor track them for potential future
payment. The order continues by stating that the UDC can continue to
notify customers of times when an interruptible curtailment would occur. The
Commission expects such customers to do so to the extent feasible. But if
they don't, there will be no penalty.
The rationale behind the order was that customers on interruptible rate
schedules have been faced with an increasingly irreconcilable dilemma;
either curtail their electric service or pay large penalties, "either of
which cause increasingly deleterious effects on themselves and the
California economy."
If you have any quesitons about the order, give me a call.
Jeanne
=====================================
|
1,855 |
Subject: Re: Reg Risk Section for DASH of DWR
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron', 'William S Bradford/Enron@EnronXGate', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/10479.
=====================================
Any info?
Jim
----- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 03/29/2001 07:29 AM -----
Christopher F Calger@ECT
03/28/2001 10:58 AM
To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: Reg Risk Section for DASH of DWR
Jim,
I have been hearing 95% probabilities that the bonds get issued. Is that
your view?
Chris
From: James D Steffes@ENRON on 03/28/2001 07:37 AM CST
To: Tracy Ngo/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: William S Bradford/Enron@EnronXGate, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron,
Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Alan
Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Christopher F
Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Reg Risk Section for DASH of DWR
Tracy --
Here is our first draft. I am checking with other Govt Affairs personnel to
incorporate their thoughts.
Jim
Tracy Ngo@ECT
03/27/2001 07:11 PM
To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: William S Bradford/Enron@EnronXGate
Subject: Re: Draft DASH of DWR
That would be great. The DASH format is ever-changing wrt to other moving
parts so no worries. -Thanks, Tracy
From: James D Steffes@ENRON on 03/27/2001 05:18 PM
To: Tracy Ngo/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Draft DASH of DWR
I'll have our comments first thing in the am. Hope that is ok.
Jim
=====================================
|
1,856 |
Subject: Kent Wheatland Memorial Award
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/12574.
=====================================
This was a really sweet message. I wanted to share it. By the way, I
learned from Kent's brother just yesterday that Kent's death was attributed
to viral meningitis. Just goes to show that you need to live each day to the
fullest.
Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 06/13/2001 11:16 AM -----
"Thompson, Thomas W." <[email protected]>
06/12/2001 10:00 AM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Kent Wheatland Memorial Award
Sue -
I'm Tom Thompson. Kent was a long-time friend, a fishing buddy, and a bad
golf mate (but lots of fun). When Gary Ackerman announced at services for
Kent the creation of the award, I was deeply touched and impressed.
My good friend Jeff Dasovich told me this weekend that you received the very
first award, and well, I must say I became a bit teary-eyed. You probably
don't know me, but I've seen you at Commission meetings and have heard your
name over the recent years. My other fishing friend, Bill Sandoval, who was
also at the services, says whomever received this award "must be a real
tiger" and we need more people like that in California.
I am happy that Kent's memorial award will go to someone so deserving.
--- Tom Thompson
=====================================
|
1,857 |
Subject: AB 81 - Property Tax
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/13259.
=====================================
Assembly Member Carole Migden amended AB 81 to transfer taxing authority
on generation facilities from local governments to the Board of
Equalization. The following is the text of the bill:
AB 81, as amended, Migden. Property taxation: state-assessed property
The California Constitution requires the State Board of
Equalization to assess the property, other than franchises, of
companies transmitting or selling gas or electricity. Existing
regulations require the board to assess an electric generation
facility, for purposes of this constitutional provision, only if (1) the
facility was constructed pursuant to a certificate of public convenience
and necessity issued by the California Public Utilities Commission to
the company that presently owns the facility or (2) the company owning
the facility is a state assessee for reasons other than its ownership of
the generation facility or its ownership of pipelines, flumes, canals,
ditches, or aqueducts lying within 2 or more counties.
This bill would require the board to annually assess every electric
generation facility with a generating capacity of 50
megawatts or more that is owned by an electrical corporation, as
defined. This bill also would invalidate any existing regulations that
are in conflict with the bill's provisions.
=====================================
|
1,858 |
Subject: Re: PX-Based SRAC Payments to QFs
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/2692.
=====================================
The haircut notion, I believe, arises from Edison's claim that the PX price
includes a capacity payment, particularly when demand (i.e., the price) is
higher. I think there's discussion of it in the proposed decision that came
out some time ago and which sits in "hold" limbo on the Commission's agenda.
I've attached it. Alan could you see if it's included in the decision? If
not, I can poke around more. Thanks.
Best,
Jeff
Alan Comnes@ECT
12/18/2000 03:59 PM
To: [email protected], [email protected]
cc:
Subject: PX-Based SRAC Payments to QFs
Jeff, Paul,
I talked to Mike Etringer and found out that the reason why he wanted to talk
to Jeff is Mike's recollection of a conversation with Jeff that a SRAC
"haIrcut" in the 5-10% range had been suggested based on the total amount of
load in California about 39,000 to 40,000 MW.
Jeff, is there anything we can point Mike to to better understand this basis
of a capacity adjustment?
In our call with Doug Kerner last week, the best guess, summed up by Calger,
was that SRAC would go PX based beginning in '03 with a capacity clipping of
20% (half way between SCE o 40% and IEP of 0%). However, I think Mike is
struggling to justify a smaller haircut. Thus, the follow up call to Jeff.
Alan Comnes
=====================================
|
1,859 |
Subject: FW: A.00-11-038, A. 00-11-056, A. 00-10-028
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/12169.
=====================================
-----Original Message-----
From: Warner, Christopher (Law) [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 4:45 PM
To: '[email protected]'; '[email protected]';
Attached is a motion filed by PG&E on Tuesday, July 3rd in which PG&E
requests that the Commission, no later than July 19th, place a market value
on their hydroelectric (and other remaining generating) assets and order
that such market value be used for the purposes of determining PG&E's
retained generation revenue requirement. Responses to the motion are due by
July 12th. Please advise if Enron wants to respond.
Jeanne
Subject: A.00-11-038, A. 00-11-056, A. 00-10-028
Enclosed please find MOTION OF PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY TO ESTABLISH
FINAL MARKET VALUATION OF NON-NUCLEAR GENERATING ASSETS PURSUANT TO PUBLIC11
UTILITIES CODE SECTION 376 filed July 3, 2001 by Pacific Gas and Electric
Company in A. 00-11-038, A. 00-11-056, A.00-10-028. Hard copy service was
made by United States mail on parties listed on the official service list
this date also. Thank you.
<<PGEURGmotion7-3elec.doc>>
Christopher J. Warner
Pacific Gas & Electric Company
P.O. Box 7442
San Francisco, CA 94120
Telephone: 415-973-6695
Facsimile: 415-972-5220
Email: [email protected]
Martie Way
30177
- PGEURGmotion7-3elec.doc
=====================================
|
1,860 |
Subject: RE: Assignment for Thursday
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['Anil Sama; Vavrek', 'Carolyn (US - San Francisco);', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/4561.
=====================================
i think there is no prep 4 thurs
those other asgnts were dropped
hope u had fun in mexico
thanks 4 the files
- cv
Carolyn M. Vavrek
Manager - Human Capital Advisory Services
Deloitte & Touche
50 Fremont Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
phone: 415-783-5137
fax: 415-783-8760
e-mail: [email protected]
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 10:27 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: Anil Sama; Vavrek, Carolyn (US - San Francisco);
[email protected]; [email protected]; Mark Guinney
Subject: Assignment for Thursday
Greetings:
Are we supposed to do the reading and the Oracle and Legal Services cases
for Thursday? Syllabus says yes, but I gather from Tasker's Izio not that
we'll be in the computer center all class doing modeling. (I'd email her,
but she doesn't get my emails apparently.) Anyone have a clue?
Best,
Jeff
This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information
intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If
you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and are
hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this
message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.
=====================================
|
1,861 |
Subject: Re: Media Inquiries
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/4391.
=====================================
Mark:
I don't know how any "concerns" I may have raised reached you, but rest
assured that there are no worries from my end.
I saw the piece on the local news. Vacar's on a one-person crusade to kill
capitalism, that's certain. It was very clear that you were taken horribly
out of context, and they did you a great disservice.
Just between us chickens, it did come up as if you were implying that there's
some reasonable likelihood that manipulation's the culprit. You can imagine
just how sensitive we are to that issue. But I don't think that you should
sweat it. In a very brief conversation with Mike Day I mentioned the piece
and that they got you responding to manipulation (i.e., "when'd you stop
beating your wife) on camera. So agitated was I that I didn't even bother to
bring it up with Herr Fawcett. So again, thanks much for the note, but no
big deal.
Now for my two cents:
Question: "what's the problem?" answer: "very bad state energy
policy---and here are the five big regulatory problems standing in the way of
a solution for California....."
"market manipulation? well, those charges are raised in every industry,
whenever prices spike. the lion's share of the time, it turns out to be
market fundamentals."
Appreciate your note. Thanks.
Jeff
=====================================
|
1,862 |
Subject: RE: Core/Noncore Analysis
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', 'Tribolet', 'Michael', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/12766.
=====================================
All:
Attached is the latest version. Note the average price of power assumed
purchased by the DWR, if smoothed to a fixed price equivalent for the 9.5
years beginning 7/1/01, is $106/mwh and $104/mwh if DWR's forward price
curves are used. We used a range of $82.75 to $104/mwh in our sensitivity
page. The $82.75 is the mid-point between Henwood and DWR curves. Enron's
curves are significantly lower on the back-end. The other switch is for the
allocation of the past utility purchases: 1) one pro rata, and 2) one where
the non-core shares prorata, plus half the core's portion. DWR past
purchases are handled pro rata in both scenarios.
Regards,
Michael
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 4:53 PM
To: [email protected]; Steffes, James; Shapiro, Richard
Cc: Tribolet, Michael
Subject: Core/Noncore Analysis
Michael Tribolet and I (about 99% Michael) have put together a rough cut
analysis of the core/noncore structure, and some scenarios Hertzberg has
asked for. Hertzberg's expecting some info from us on Monday (and I'm sure
that he'll want more scenarios, too). Are you available first thing Monday
morning to be briefed on the analysis, my conversations with Hertzberg, what
Hertzberg's strategy is, etc.?
=====================================
|
1,863 |
Subject: RE: Need for Resources
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/423.
=====================================
This will work for what I need to submit. FYI: I'm not going to get another person to help out on this, so I'm assuming that with me and the resources that I'll bring to bear, and with you folks and the resources that you'll devote, we'll be able to do an outstanding job of achieving the overall objective of taking a proactive regulatory stance in California.
Best,
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Miller, Stephanie
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 12:38 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Cc: Tycholiz, Barry; Tholt, Jane M.
Subject: Need for Resources
Based upon the discussion in our last meeting, we would suggest the need for increased coverage of the following areas:
1. PG&E's Gas Accord
2. PG&E's attempt to switch backbone jurisdiciton to FERC through the bankruptcy proceeding
3. Movement in Socal's GIR or other plans to open its backbone to firm transport
4. Socal's RLS tariff and requests to reduce the cost allocation to that service.
5. Socal WACOG filings, calculations
6. Tariff changes that provide for backhaul service from SDG&E/North Baja to Socal territory
Jeff - this is just a cursory list. Our real need is to have information that comes from a proactive stance in the regulatory processes.
Please call Barry or myself if you have any questions.
Regards,
Stephanie
=====================================
|
1,864 |
Subject: GRC2 Assigned Commissioner Ruling/Schedule
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/general_rate_case_s_/3.
=====================================
Some issues are to be addressed in other proceedings and not litigated in the
GRC2. PG&E must remove all portions of its filed testimony that are to be
addressed in other proceedings.
Advice Letter Filing:
Applicability of Schedule ED through the rate freeze, pre existing Economic
Development Rate Schedule terminated in Dec. 1998
Post Transition Ratemaking Proceeding (PTR):
PG&E's proposals in the GRC2 WILL NOT supersede revenue allocation and rate
design proposals in the PTR
PTR issues are:
Allocation and rate design of CTCs.
Ratemaking issues related to the RRB memorandum account, PPP and Nuc.
Decommissioning.
Revenue Cycle Services (RCS):
All RCS ratemaking issues will be litigated in the RCS proceeding.
GRC2:
Schedule EB (post transition economic development rate schedule)
Bypass Charges
VBU
Rate design for distribution
GRC2 Schedule Highlights
The schedule is contingent upon the issuance of a final decision in GRC. PG&E
is also schedule to provide models and comparison exhibits.
Scenario 1 Scenario 2
GRC1 final decision 12/2 12/16
ORA testimony 1/7 1/25
Intervenors Testimony 2/14 3/4
Rebuttal - all parties 3/6 3/24
Hearings 3/20 to 3/31 4/10 to 4/14
4/10 to 4/14 4/25 to 5/5
PD 8/2000 8/2000 Decision Fall 200 Fall 2000
=====================================
|
1,865 |
Subject: Pricing Information
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/8120.
=====================================
Best of luck. You've got a tough job. Guess you'll be working that much
harder now that John Stevens is on his way to San Francisco.
At last week's meeting, a request was made for peak and off peak prices.
I've attached prices that we filed yesterday at FERC as part of its on-going
proceeding of forward contracts. Few comments:
We'd appreciate it if you could keep the information confidential,
particularly since the information is covered by FERC's confidentiality
provisions.
Since we are not a "generator," we buy and sell in the market, which as you
know is currently very volatile. Consequently, the quotes that we provide
customers change daily to reflect changing market prices. These prices were
put together and filed yesterday, but you may have heard that prices were
down today. So quotes we made today were lower. And quotes we makes
tomorrow will reflect tomorrow's market conditions and will likely be
different from today's.
Because these quotes were assembled yesterday, they are only "indicative."
That is, if someone wanted to buy these products today, we'd have to
recalculate prices, because the quotes established yesterday are no longer
valid (for the reasons I mentioned above).
Hope this helps. If you have any questions, let me know.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
1,866 |
Subject: Government Affairs-The Americas: Department Meeting
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/5501.
=====================================
Woodlands, here we come again!!!! The next Government Affairs-The Americas
meeting is scheduled for Friday, March 9 at 8:00am and should conclude by
5:00pm. For those staying overnight, I have a block of rooms reserved and I
will be putting a rooming list together for the conference center. Please do
not call the conference center directly for reservations. I will need to
know by Wednesday, February 7 of your plans to attend this meeting and if you
will require overnight accommodations (pls indicate # of nights needed).
The location of the meeting will be:
The Woodlands Resort
2301 North Millbend Drive
The Woodlands, TX 77380
Phone# 281-367-1100
Fax# 281-364-6274
Check-In time is 3:00pm
Check-Out time is 12:00pm
The Woodlands Resort provides transportation service to and from the airport
on a scheduled basis from 6:00am - 10:00pm at a cost of $32.00 per person,
per trip. Reservations must be made a minimum of 24 hours in advance for
both arrivals and departures. If you have an interest in using this service,
please call the transportation desk at 281-364-6256.
The agenda for the meeting is still a work in progress and I will forward it
to everyone once it is finalized.
Thanks and please don't hesitate to call me if you have any questions.
gngr
713-853-7751
=====================================
|
1,867 |
Subject: Re: Friday is the last day for purchasing Discount Ski Tickets!!!!!
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/774.
=====================================
hi sweetie. should we buy some?
Will C Birdsey <[email protected]>
Sent by: [email protected]
10/25/2000 01:07 PM
Please respond to Will C Birdsey
To: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Friday is the last day for purchasing Discount Ski Tickets!!!!!
Just a quick reminder, Friday is the last day to purchase your discount ski
tickets. We need to buy 50 to make this thing happen. Please get your
checks in ASAP. Thanks
Redwoods@Haas is organizing discounted ski tickets at Squaw Valley and Alpine
Meadows.
This is a great way to save some money if you plan on skiing this year.
Both Squaw and Alpine are PREMIERE North Lake Tahoe ski resorts.
Squaw Valley Tickets cost $45 each and include night skiing. (Regular Price
$54)
Make checks payable to Will Birdsey and leave them in my MBA02 mailbox.
Deadline Friday, October 27th!
Alpine Meadows Tickets cost $42 each. (Regular Price $52)
Make checks payable to Matt Hawe and leave them in his MBA02 mailbox.
Deadline Friday, October 27th!
Tickets are good all ski season (including holidays and weekends)
Tickets are transferrable
Buy as many (or as few) tickets as you want
See you on the slopes!
=====================================
|
1,868 |
Subject: Two sections for CPUC repsonses
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/1205.
=====================================
FYI. Haven't reviewed it yet. Please review and comment. Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES on 09/07/2000
11:50 AM ---------------------------
"Seabron Adamson" <[email protected]> on 09/07/2000
10:00:56 AM
To: "Mona L Petrochko" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Two sections for CPUC repsonses
Mona:
I saw the email about the delay. We have attached some draft material for
some of the questions anyway. I will call you in a bit to go through it.
Seab
This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the
addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or
confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this
e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify me at
(617) 354-0060 and permanently delete the original and any copy of any
e-mail and any printout thereof.
Seabron Adamson
Frontier Economics Inc
Two Brattle Square
Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
Ph: (617) 354-0060
Fax: (617) 354-0640
[email protected]
- 00-09-07 SA Seab additions.doc
- 00-09-07 SS Sabine additions.doc
=====================================
|
1,869 |
Subject: Urgent WPTF Board Meeting to Discuss FERC Order on SDG&E
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/wptf/7.
=====================================
Folks,
Today the FERC issued an Order on SDG&E's complaint to cap generator
bids at $250, and they did so not only with a flat denial, but also by
opening a Section 206 Proceeding to investigate California's wholesale
power markets. That means there will be full evidentiary hearing at
FERC regarding California's wholesale market. WPTF is an intervenor in
the case, and I think we should discuss WPTF's strategy and position on
this case before the next Board meeting (September 12).
Toward that end, I have asked Rob Lamkin, our Chairman, to establish a
date for a Board teleconference call to discuss our position, craft a
motion, and vote. I have also asked Dan Douglass to review the attached
Order of FERC (both docs are the same, but slightly different computer
format), prepare a summary, and to prepare an estimate for WPTF's
participation. I would be more than happy to be a witness in the case.
I am also sending this notice to our general member representative who
may wish to be participants in our pleading. Whereas the general
members can not vote on WPTF's major positions, they can participate in
the case development, funding, and preparation.
I will inform you of the date and time for our teleconference Board
meeting in a later e-mail.
gba
- el00-950.DOC
- el00-9500a.doc
=====================================
|
1,870 |
Subject: New Procedure for Projects/RCR's
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/administrative/17.
=====================================
REMINDER: all engagements of outside resources are to go through the RCR
process. Also, this process is now on-line. Please see below.
Thanks
---------------------- Forwarded by Ginger Dernehl/HOU/EES on 11/01/99 11:01
AM ---------------------------
Enron Energy Services
From: Ginger Dernehl 10/19/99 05:02 PM
Phone No: 713 853-7751
To: State Government/Federal Regulatory Affairs Group
cc:
Subject: New Procedure for Projects/RCR's
Please see the note from Elizabeth below.
RCR's are now on-line and should be submitted via this on-line format.
Please refrain from using the old form.
Thank you,
gngr
Please see the attached Word document for directions on a new on-line
procedure for RCR's. All RCR requests must now be submitted on-line through
the Project Tracking system. To access the system, click on the first link
below, and a new icon will be added to your Lotus Notes desktop (it has a
picture of a globe). (Don't click on the other two links, they'll be added
automatically.) If you have any problems accessing the system, please call
me. If you have any questions on entering the information, please call me or
Ginger. Thanks!!
Click on this link --> > Gov Affairs
> Projects
> Contacts
Instructions: -->
=====================================
|
1,871 |
Subject: Re: Location of WPTF Board Meeting on Monday, Sept 11, at 1pm
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/232.
=====================================
FYI, the Arter & Hadden office is all of 2.9 miles from the airport, so it's
a very short cab ride.? If anyone is driving and needs directions, please
let me know.? Our office has a small conference room which might not be
large enough for all the Board attendees, so we are meeting a few floors
down, in a larger room which the building makes available to tenants.? As
Gary noted, it is called the Boardroom, and is located on the fourth floor.?
We'll bring in some sandwich menus and order out for a late lunch.? Look
forward to seeing you.
?
Dan
?
> "Gary Ackerman" <[email protected]> 09/05/00 02:09PM >>>
Folks,
We have a venue and location for our new Board meeting.? Arter & Hadden
has offered their office space.
Dan wrote me:
"Gary, our office is at 402 West Broadway.? Phone is (619) 238-0001 and
fax is (619) 238-8333.? The room is called "The Boardroom" and it's on
the 4th floor.? Arter & Hadden will pick up the charge, in thanks for
all the work which comes our direction from WPTF.? Do you want to start
with a lunch?? Or would you prefer to assume people will have lunched
and just have snacks and drinks?"
I told Dan we would appreciate a late lunch, at 2 pm.? The meeting will
start at 1 pm.
The dial-in number is 712-257-3178
PC 39908
Okay, That's it.
gba
=====================================
|
1,872 |
Subject: MORE INFO: SBX18
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/11491.
=====================================
See below from Reg Affairs
---------------------- Forwarded by Jennifer Rudolph/HOU/EES on 04/24/2001
03:48 PM ---------------------------
Robert Neustaedter@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
04/24/2001 03:36 PM
SBX18, if passed, would provide for a Core/ Noncore customer split, similar
to that of the natural gas markets. Utilities would be required to establish
a portfolio of electric supplies to serve the needs of bundled core
cusomers. Ninety days after the end of the rate freeze, determined by the
Commission, customers with loads greater than 500 kilowatts would not be
allowed to obtain service from the core portfolio. Any noncore customer not
taking electricity directly from an ESP would be provided power by the
utility exclusively from the spot market and would be charged the cost
incurred by the utility in providing such service.
Jeff's assesment is that the bill, in its current form, has less that a 50/50
chance of passage. The bill is highly controversial pitting the core against
noncore customers. Without any transition period, the bill could have a
significant negative impact to Enron's current book position.
If you have any additional questions, please feel free to call.
SBX 18
http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/bill/sen/sb_0001-0050/sbx1_18_bill_20010125_introdu
ced.pdf
=====================================
|
1,873 |
Subject: Transport Options program
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/156.
=====================================
Jeff,
As I mentioned in my voice mail message, we met today with a group of
customers in a workshop format to discuss the options filing, proposed
amendment and tariff changes. With the possible exception of one company
(Amoco), I thought the comments/feedback were mostly positive.
There seems to be two principal areas of concern with the proposed program:
(1) the possibility of affiliate abuse by ENA or EES, and (2) the potential
of a party (ENA, or 3rd party) to exert market power. Our position going
into the workshop, and our most likely response going into the FERC
proceeding, is that Transwestern doesn't want to be put into the position of
being a "gatekeeper" for these issues, particularly with respect to market
power. In addition, we believe there are adequate protections under existing
FERC policies (Order no. 497) regarding affiliate transactions.
We have a couple more personal meetings with the utilities in California
(SoCal and PG&E) to complete prior to moving forward with the filing. I'm
planning on going out to California the week of Sept. 11. I'd love to hook
up with you while I'm there. I'll call you with specifics shortly.
If can answer any questions for you regarding the documents or the program
itself, please give me a call at ext. 3-1521.
=====================================
|
1,874 |
Subject: FW: AReM's first news story from statement: Bloomberg-- California
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['Manuel', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', 'Erica; Allen', '[email protected]', "Stevan; '[email protected]'; Denne"]
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/92.
=====================================
-----Original Message-----
From: Fairchild, Tracy [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 2:46 PM
To: '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'
Cc: Manuel, Erica; Allen, Stevan; '[email protected]'; Denne,
Karen
Subject: AReM's first news story from statement: Bloomberg-- California
Plan to Suspend Power Choice Is Illegal
AReMers--
Dan Douglass and I just finished doing three interviews with the LA Times,
SF Chronicle and a a second interview with Bloomberg for publication later
today. They all went well, especially with the SF Chron because the
reporter, Bernadette Tansey, is knowledgeable and interested. The first
Bloomberg story is attached below. The Ontario Inland Daily Bulletin is
working on a story today as well. AP plans to write about this story next
week, closer to the hearing.
Also: reporters want to talk to customers who may be caught in this mess
because they signed after July 1. PLEASE FORWARD A FEW CONTACTS. THEY MUST
BE OUT THERE. THANKS.
A new twist to stress in any media interviews you may do: tell reporters
that the PUC does not regulate ESPs, their customer relationships or
contracts. This is mentioned in the legal memo but not the statement and it
helps to underscore the absurdity of the retroactive draft decision.
=====================================
|
1,875 |
Subject: FW: CSO - High Tech Recruiting Activities and last reminder to
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/92.
=====================================
FYI.
-----Original Message-----
From: Rich Wong [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 1:10 PM
To: [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: CSO - High Tech Recruiting Activities and last reminder to
subscribe
Following are upcoming high tech recruiting activities for graduating
students.
After today, these messages will only be sent through the hcchtft
distribution
list, so if you are interested, please subscribe through majordomo. If you
have
already subscribed, you should be receiving today's message twice.
Resume Drops due tonight at midnight (note description in BearTracks of
revised process vs.last year):
Microsoft (10/15 interviews)
Intel Finance (10/16 interviews)
Presentations (please sign-up on BearTracks)
Siebel Systems (9/25 at 12:30pm)
Inktomi (9/28 at 12:30pm)
Brown-Bag Workshops
Entrepreneurial/Start-up 2nd year panel (9/20 at 12:30pm, sign-ups are full
but feel free to show up and we will accomodate who we can from no-shows and
a few
extra chairs)
Rich
Rich Wong
Account Manager, Technology
MBA Recruiting
Haas School of Business Career Center
545 Student Services Building #1900
Berkeley, CA 94720-1900
ph: 510-643-4211
fax: 510-643-5257
email:[email protected]
=====================================
|
1,876 |
Subject: RE: ______________
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/309.
=====================================
I'll forward to them.
-----Original Message-----
From: Mara, Susan
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 10:05 AM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: FW: ______________
Does someone at the Chamber want to see this?
-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Douglass [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 1:16 AM
To: ARM; Gary Ackerman; Vicki Sandler; Anderson, Robert; Max Bulk; John Yurkanin; Steve Huhman; Mike Day; Paul Fenn
Subject: ______________
Attached for your review and comment is a revised draft of the application for rehearing to be filed on Friday the 28th. There are two primary changes. The California Chamber of Commerce has been added to the application and an argument has been added that the Decision contradicts the most recent legislative intent expressed in ABX2 9 that direct access continue, at least for aggregation and community choice purposes.
Any and all comments will be very much appreciated. Also, I would appreciate it if Sue Mara would forward the document to her contact at the Chamber so that they can also review the draft. Thanks!
Dan
Law Offices of Daniel W. Douglass
5959 Topanga Canyon Blvd. Suite 244
Woodland Hills, CA 91367
Tel: (818) 596-2201
Fax: (818) 346-6502
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
=====================================
|
1,877 |
Subject: EBS All Employee Meetings
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/8938.
=====================================
----- Forwarded by Sue Nord/NA/Enron on 02/07/2001 05:01 PM -----
Lara Leibman@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
02/07/2001 04:58 PM
To: Sue Nord/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: EBS All Employee Meetings
----- Forwarded by Lara Leibman/Enron Communications on 02/07/01 05:05 PM
-----
OFFICE OF THE CHAIRMAN
Sent by: EBS Announcements
02/06/01 05:14 PM
To: All EBS WORLDWIDE
cc:
Subject: EBS All Employee Meetings
As EBS moves further into 2001, we would like to take some time to reinforce
our strategy and establish common goals for the year. We have scheduled the
following all-employee meetings for EBS' various locations:
HOUSTON & PLEASANTON (via video conference) Wednesday, February 14 Hyatt
Regency - Imperial Ballroom
3:00-4:30pm (CST)
PORTLAND Thursday, March 8 Marriott Hotel - Salon E
1:30-3:00pm (PST)
The date for a meeting in London is currently being finalized. Pleasanton
employees will again be linked into the Houston meeting via video conference.
At each of the meetings, we will share a portion of the EBS analyst
presentation. We'll also take time to answer your questions. If you wish to
submit questions in advance, please send them via e-mail to Jessica Nevin.
Refreshments will be provided at each of the meetings.
=====================================
|
1,878 |
Subject: PLEASE RESPOND
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/4374.
=====================================
Silicon Valley Manufacturing Group Members:
The Governor's office has reached out to the Silicon Valley Manufacturing
Group to assist them in understanding the needs and concerns of the business
community. One very important aspect of the energy issue is that of
conservation. In an attempt to understand the usage patterns of business
and their efforts towards conservation, the Governor's office asked that we
implement this quick survey. Please take a moment to answer the following
questions and return to me via e-mail by 4:30 this evening. By completing
this survey we will help the Governor address our needs.
-Please indicate at what temperature your company has historically kept the
thermostat set.
-Please indicate where your company expects to keep the thermostat set given
the current conditions.
*PLEASE NOTE*
All information received through this survey will remain confidential. SVMG
continues to protect the interests of its member companies. This survey in
no way demeans that obligation. All information provided to any party will
be anonymous. Thank you for taking the time to complete this survey. Given
the urgency of the current situation and its constantly changing nature, I
apologize for the short time frame in which to respond. Any information
will be appreciated.
=====================================
|
1,879 |
Subject: Re: Follow Up On California Information
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/11800.
=====================================
Let's discuss a bit. When you get a chance, please page me at 888.916.7184.
Best,
Jeff
John Shelk
06/26/2001 01:22 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: Follow Up On California Information
Alan and I spoke about point #2 on the comparison benchmark. At this point,
we may be able to just say it is based on a comparison of the contracts with
today's forward market and gloss over the exact forward curve we used. Of
course if there is a way to come up with a similar number using publicly
available data (or if we are willing to provide our numbers if pressed) then
all the better. In the mean time, should I hold off on using the $13.8
billion number until I hear back from you about the conversation with Steve?
Also, do I understand correctly from Alan that the $13.8 billion figure is
NOT comparing the long term contracts California signed with recent spot
market prices, but rather is a comparison of the contracts to our present
forward pricing curves? From you e-mail, it is the latter, I take it.
As to point #1, on the deal last year, we just need a similar "back of the
envelope" calculation on what California could have saved had California
taken us up on the offers we and others made. Any guidance on where to get
that would be most helpful.
=====================================
|
1,880 |
Subject: HTC presents "The Future of the PC Sector and Wintel"
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/466.
=====================================
With the delayed debut of the Speaker Series, we decided to start it off
with a bang! Not one great speaker, but two!
Wondering about the HP-Compaq merger?
Interested about the future of the PC industry?
Curious about Microsoft's plans?
What does Intel do next?
Then we invite you to...
The Inaugural Haas Fall Technology Speaker Series
presented by the Haas Technology Club
"The Future of the PC Sector and Wintel"
Rich Gardner, Senior Analyst, Salomon Smith Barney
&
Joe Osha, Senior Analyst, Merrill Lynch
Date: Thursday, October 11th
Time: 6:00 to 7:30 p.m. with refreshments from 5:30 p.m.
Location: Cheit 220
Come listen to Rich Gardner and Joe Osha give their views on where the PC
sector is going and what it means for all the major players including both
Microsoft and Intel. Rich covers the PC companies and Microsoft for
Salomon, and Joe covers semiconductor companies including Intel for
Merrill. You've seen these guys on CNBC and now is your chance to ask them
questions. Join us for what should be a fun evening!
And our second event will be:
"The Future of Data Storage
Kris Hagerman, SVP Corporate Development, Veritas Software
Date: Thursday, October 25th
Time: 5:30 to 7:00 p.m. with refreshments from 5:00 p.m.
Location: Cheit 220
Note: It's been rescheduled from October 4th.
=====================================
|
1,881 |
Subject: Re: Confirmation October 3-4 Meeting
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/452.
=====================================
This works for my schedule. I will likely attend the subpoena meeting.
Richard B Sanders@ECT
Sent by: Twanda Sweet@ECT
09/29/2000 05:31 PM
To: Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christian
Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected]
cc: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jan M King/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard
Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Confirmation October 3-4 Meeting
This email will confirm the meeting in Portland for October 3rd and 4th. I
would like to start the meeting at 11:00 a.m. Please let me know immediately
if this presents a problem with your schedule. Christian Yoder, Mary Hain,
Gary Fergus, and I will be meeting at 9:00 a.m. on Tuesday, October 3rd to
discuss our response to the CPUC subpoena. Please let me know if you would
like to attend this meeting. Finally, I have asked everyone to schedule a
day and a half for this meeting. Although we may be finished on Tuesday, I
thought it was prudent to leave Wednesday open for further discussion.
Please feel free to call me at (713) 853-5587 if you have any questions. The
contact in Enron's Portland office is Jan King. Jan's number is (504)
464-8814.
Thanks.
Richard Sanders
=====================================
|
1,882 |
Subject: RE: pg&e term sheet
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/2179.
=====================================
great. good luck with others.
-----Original Message-----
From: Mellencamp, Lisa
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 11:14 AM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: RE: pg&e term sheet
started but got pulled out.
waiting to see louise/lavorato out having baby today.
buy is ok.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 11:13 AM
To: Mellencamp, Lisa
Subject: RE: pg&e term sheet
you get in to see whalley?
-----Original Message-----
From: Mellencamp, Lisa
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 11:08 AM
To: '[email protected]'
Cc: Tribolet, Michael; Curry, Wanda; Dasovich, Jeff; Steffes, James D.
Subject: pg&e term sheet
i talked to david fleisig at pg&e last night. he begged for simple term sheet that could be flushed out in definitive documentation.
would you add the following for people to comment on in the term sheet:
we will oppose the assessment of an underscheduling penalty at the ferc.
they will oppose the assessment of any surcharge to da customers by the cpuc for any of their undercollections.
we will both cooperate to either get ferc alj approval of the settlement or if we waive this requirement in our discretion (e.g. if some holdup there/we want to close fast), they will immediately pay to us any refund that we end up paying that goes to them.
=====================================
|
1,883 |
Subject: Re: DA in PG&E and SCE?
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/3079.
=====================================
Yes, but there's a commitment to reverse it in another bill (AB 27X) that=
=20
Debra Bowen is carrying. There is a helluvalot of uproar about that langua=
ge=20
in the bill and just about everyone is united to fix it. Keep your fingers=
=20
crossed, and we'll keep you posted.
Best,
Jeff
=09Douglas Condon@EES
=0902/02/2001 08:00 PM
=09=09=20
=09=09 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Eric Letke/DUB/EES@EES, George=20
Waidelich/SFO/EES@EES
=09=09 cc:=20
=09=09 Subject: DA in PG&E and SCE?
Is this statement correct?
Another flea on this legislation is the suspension of new direct access=20
customers during the time that DWR is procuring energy.? The bill states, "=
=01(=20
the right of retail end use customers =01( to acquire service from other=20
providers shall be suspended until the department no longer supplies power=
=20
hereunder."? Voila.? Not only do we get a rate increase, but our ability to=
=20
choose an alternative energy supplier is hereby waived.? I would think the=
=20
average Californian would be outraged by that dictate.? Of course, most=20
Californians didn't know that they had a choice.? Therefore, the legislatio=
n=20
made a grand leap forward by lowering our opportunity set to be in line wit=
h?=20
expectations.=20
I wonder what the Legislature will do next week?=20
=====================================
|
1,884 |
Subject: RE: Trying agin
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['Soo', 'Jeffrey A.; Neustaedter', 'Robert', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/12387.
=====================================
agreed.
Michael Tribolet/ENRON@enronXgate
05/11/2001 05:33 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Jeffrey A Soo/ENRON@enronXgate, Robert
Neustaedter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: RE: Trying agin
Note that SCE does not list the information in their SEC disclosures but
Robert had some 1999 figures. Comparing PGE at the sales level, they were
at 79.2 mln MWH in 1999 versus 78.2 for SCE in 1999. This leads me to
believe the 93 mln for PGE and 83 million for SCE in the MOU slide is flat
wrong on the PGE figure. We will need to resolve this.
PGE
SALES MWH 1999
RESIDENTIAL 27,739
COMMERCIAL 30,426
INDUSTRIAL 16,722
ARGICULTURAL 3,739
PUBLIC STREET 437
OTHER UTILITIES 167
OTHER -
NON RESIDENTIAL 51,491
TOTAL 79,230
SCE
SALES MWH 1999
RESIDENTIAL 24,351
COMMERCIAL 28,964
INDUSTRIAL 24,164
ARGICULTURAL
PUBLIC STREET
OTHER UTILITIES
OTHER 727
NON RESIDENTIAL 53,855
TOTAL 78,206
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 5:03 PM
To: Tribolet, Michael
Cc: Soo, Jeffrey A.; Neustaedter, Robert
Subject: RE: Trying agin
can we use the MOU total load numbes (e.g., 93 GWH for PG&E) and divide it up
using the proportions in the PG&E numbers?
=====================================
|
1,885 |
Subject: Re: Eastern European Opportunity
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/8302.
=====================================
Thanks for the heads up. I am passing it along to our commercial leader for
that part of the world, Eric Shaw. mcs
From: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON on 11/01/2001 15:54 CST
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
To: Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: Eastern European Opportunity
Greetings Mark:
Any interest?
Best,
Jeff
"Daniel Douglass" <[email protected]>
01/11/2001 03:18 PM
To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Eastern European Opportunity
Jeff and Sue,
I have a potential lead which may be of interest to Enron. However, I don't
know if you have any interest in Eastern European projects.
Who would you suggest talking to with regard to a Bulgarian power plant
development? It involves a 25 year requirements contract with the national
energy company, the retrofit of two existing units and building three new
hydro units. Total around 450 MW. Party with exclusive deal with government
wants to deal with an engineering company who could finance and do work ( @
$160 million). Any suggestions on how to proceed? My guess is that few
engineering companies are into financing these days, particularly in emerging
nations. However, what are your thoughts/suggestions?
Thanks, and Happy New Year!
Dan
=====================================
|
1,886 |
Subject: Stanford University survey about terrorist attacks
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/448.
=====================================
Hi all
This is an interesting study being conducted by Stanford University Psych.
Dept. (I know we're not suppose to associate with the "southerners" but I
felt we can make an exception here.)
It can be completed online and takes 15-20 minutes.
Irene
http://ostinato.stanford.edu/coping/index.html
"WHAT ARE YOUR THOUGHTS AND FEELINGS ABOUT THE RECENT TERRORIST ATTACKS ON
AMERICA?
YOU CAN HELP: Stanford University scientists need your help to better
understand how individuals like you across America and around the world are
coping with the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. The accompanying
CONFIDENTIAL survey designed for adults (18 or over) asks questions about
your reactions to the events and about your personal background. Your
experiences and your views are extremely important, as they will enable us to
document the range of individuals' reactions — from distress to
resilience — in the face of tragedy. Your participation in this 15-20
minute survey will help us to understand and promote better ways to cope with
such events."
___________________________________________________
Try the new Local2Me search feature on the web site - find great
tips on all sorts of things. Log in and click into a community to search.
http://www.Local2Me.com
--
<br>
.
=====================================
|
1,887 |
Subject: Reminder for Energy Emergency Notification Workshop
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/1076.
=====================================
<http://evite.citysearch.com/r?iid=SCGQIONACYHQVSUJRBND>
This is your Reminder for:
Energy Emergency Notification Workshop
You are still undecided. To RSVP, just Click Here <http://evite.citysearch.com/r?iid=SCGQIONACYHQVSUJRBND>.
<http://evite.citysearch.com/html/emails/images/purpDot.gif>
<http://evite.citysearch.com/html/emails/images/purpDot.gif>
HAVING TROUBLE?
If nothing happens when you click the link above, click it twice. If nothing happens then use your mouse to cut and paste the following address:
http://evite.citysearch.com/r?iid=SCGQIONACYHQVSUJRBND
into your Web browser, then hit return. That will take you to the invite.
If you can't access the event page: :
1. Go to <http://evite.citysearch.com/>
2. Log in (if you are already a member) or sign up for an Evite account, using the same email address the organizer used to contact you about this event.
3. Go to your "MyEVITE" inbox and click the event title to view your invite!
Still having trouble? Email [email protected]
----------------------------------------------
Brought to you by Evite
Check out http://evite.citysearch.com/ today.
Getting your friends together just got easier.
<http://evite.citysearch.com/mailDetect?iid=SCGQIONACYHQVSUJRBND>
14141414 <http://nullPOCFIEQKTZUQBTUFRLYA.gif>
=====================================
|
1,888 |
Subject: Midterm Exam
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/mba__finance/3.
=====================================
I have made up the midterm exam. Since I had finished the midterm by
Tuesday's class, but not yet on Monday's class, here is what I revealed in
Tuesday's lecture that I did not know on monday. Everything is subject to
change.
1) Currently the midterm consists of 8 questions.
2) In addition there is an extra credit question. This question is VERY
difficult (I never give extra credit easily), and should definitely not be
attempted until you have finished everything else.
3) The questions are arranged approximately in order of difficulty. Please
try not to throw away points by making mistakes on the gimme questions.
4) The last few questions are harder, so don't waste too much time on the
easy questions. Still, 2 hours should be more than sufficient to do the
midterm. (I expect most people to finish in 1.5 hours.) I would give you
longer, but the time limit is actually for your benifit. If I give you more
time, all that happens is students tend to obsess. I have actually
witnessed students cross out a perfectly correct answer and replace it with
the incorrect one!
5) Finally, I would have to say that this midterm is a little harder than
ones I have given in the past. Hopefully, you will ace it anyway, at least
that is my expectation based on my experience in the classroom.
Good luck !!!!!
=====================================
|
1,889 |
Subject: Spring 2001 Welcome Back!
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/8173.
=====================================
Hi Evening MBA Students,
Happy New Year to you! Spring Semester classes will begin Tuesday, January
16, and I wanted to note the following:
Back to School Packages.
We will be sending out the "Back to School" package to your home addresses
on Monday, January 8. This package includes information on courses, books,
rooms, parking and other important items. First class assignments, if any,
will be included in the Back to School package or mailed separately.
Textbooks and Readers.
Textbooks and readers will be available to you the first week of classes:
First-year students: Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday evenings from
5:00-6:00 pm and 7:30-8:15 pm in room F621.
Second- and third- year students: Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday evenings
from 5:00-6:00 pm and 7:30-8:15 pm in room C132.
After that, I'll have the books for you in the Evening MBA office.
Parking Passes and Permits.
The parking department only has enough parking passes at the moment to
distribute one package to each student who has requested parking. We will
contact you as soon as the second and third packages come in.
Fall 00 E203 Students.
If you checked out a calculator for E203 last fall, you will need to return
it to the office before you can pick up your Spring 01 books and readers.
We look forward to seeing you again,
TJ
=====================================
|
1,890 |
Subject: Survey on upcoming Pacific Rim & Latin American Tours
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/850.
=====================================
Hi,
Early registration for the Pac Rim and Latin American tours this January is way down this year. We recognize that this is a difficult time in many respects - we would like your input to determine if we have to cancel one or both of these trips.
Thank you very much,
Pac Rim Club & Latin American Club
Go to: http://www.zoomerang.com/survey.zgi?R36SLM5WCARQMQR2HAN9R1FJ
Please click this link now (or go online and retype the address into your Web
browser). If you do not want to take this or other surveys, please click "reply" and
ask the survey creator to remove you from the email list.
Zoomerang is a survey clearinghouse. We do not censor the questions or
messages in the surveys or the invitations to take surveys that third
parties may propound, nor do we censor the responses you may provide. The
sender of a survey is solely responsible for the subject matter and contents
of the survey invitation and survey in which you participate, and you are
solely responsible for the contents of your response.
According to Zoomerang's Terms of Agreement, <http://www.zoomerang.com/join/terms-of-agreement.html> survey senders
promise that they have an ongoing business or personal relationship or they've obtained
consent to send emails to survey recipients. Please send questions to [email protected].
=====================================
|
1,891 |
Subject: Re: Meeting 8AM Central Monday
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/11082.
=====================================
Scott --
Can your assistant get a call in # for those in CA?
Jim
Scott Stoness@EES
04/13/2001 12:00 PM
To: Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON, [email protected]@ENRON, Tamara Johnson/HOU/EES@EES,
Jeff Dasovich/Na/Enron@ENRON, James W Lewis/HOU/EES@EES, Leslie
Lawner/HOU/EES@EES, Leslie Lawner/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Meeting 8AM Central Monday
We have agreed on a strategy, subject to Whaley/Delaney approval, to:
Scott Stoness submit testimony today advocating 2 part real time pricing in CA
Read other parties testimony this weekend from the perspective "Has somebody
filed testimony close enough to Stoness testimony, that we can cross examine
and brief to a favorable outcome?"
Meet on Monday at 8AM to decide whether to rescind Stoness's testimony.
The following dial in number and code corresponds to the Monday 8AM Central
Time meeting.
1 800 713 8600
68266 is PIN
Scott Stoness is host
Action Items:
All on To list above read and have opinion on 2 and 3 above
All on To list above meet on Monday at 8AM. Meet in Stoness office if
possible.
Harry and Jeane polish Stoness testimony and wait to the last minute before
submitting it
Jeane ensure all on this To list get a copy of testimony, emailed as soon as
she gets it.
Scott Stoness
=====================================
|
1,892 |
Subject: Re: PUC Approves DWR Language in Decision; Removes Language Staying
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/5037.
=====================================
Jeff, I am too simple to understand this! What does removing the direct
access language do? I do not recognise the document from which it was removed
, hence I do not know whether this is bad or good for Enron! However from
your last statement - ' has no proposal before it implementing the
prohibition' - I am interpreting that the implementation of the Direct
Access prohibition is no longer on anyones agenda so that would be good for
Enron.
Hope you are still having fun!
Kathryn
The Commission just voted out one half of the "Bilas Alternate."
The decision that got voted out included Bilas' DWR-based language stating
that the PUC 1) would not second-guess DWR purchases and 2) would pass
through DWR costs to customers.
However, in a move led by Commissioner Carl Wood, the decision removed the
Bilas language on Direct Access. The decision therefore did NOT include the
Bilas language staying any Commission action on implementing the Direct
Access prohibition. Carl Wood called including Direct Access "the height of
arrogance."
The decision was voted out 3-2, with the 2 remaining Republicans dissenting.
That said, the Commission has no proposal before it implementing the
prohibition, and there was no talk at the meeting of implementing the
prohibition any time soon.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
1,893 |
Subject: California's Price Caps Raising Average Cost of Power
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/90.
=====================================
California's Price Caps Raising Average Cost of Power=20
The retail price caps imposed in California are leading to higher average=
=20
prices for longer periods of time as demand responsiveness is dulled and=20
supply is retarded, according to a report released by Morgan Stanley Dean=
=20
Witter. Traders interviewed by the firm said that calendar strips for 2001=
=20
through 2003 have traded in excess of $100/MWh, or around $30/MWh higher th=
an=20
a month ago. What's more, the firm said, the expected trough in the forward=
=20
curve =01* projected in the 2002-2003 time frame =01* "continues to move ou=
t in=20
time."=20
The Dean Witter study reported that the change in futures pricing for the=
=20
California Oregon Border (a proxy for Northern California pricing) and at=
=20
Palo Verde (a proxy for Southern California pricing) trading hubs show=20
similar upward trends from June through August.=20
The study said the most alarming thing for the state is the increased threa=
t=20
of power outages. Higher priced regions like the desert Southwest and the=
=20
Northwest "will suck exports out of the state and deter imports," Dean Witt=
er=20
said. The tight supply situation is pushing average prices higher, more=20
often, and increasing the risk imports won't arrive at all when they are=20
truly needed.
=====================================
|
1,894 |
Subject: RE: Annie
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/2230.
=====================================
This is very sad. Prentice (now one of PWC's finest) and I talked and here's where I come out. I love Annie and want to remember her the way she is. And I bet she would feel the same way. All the chemo gets her is a little more time, and who knows how long, and the quality of extended life is likely to be very low. It's really hard, but I think that the best thing for Annie, and everyone else, is for Annie to go to sleep, peacefully and quietly. I hope you don't mind, but I'd like to pass on the 6 o'clock phone call. I hope you understand. I'll be at your place on Thursday to see her.
Best,
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Nancy Sellers [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 2:39 PM
To: 'Eldon Sellers'; Cameron; Jeff Dasovich; Prentice Sellers; Scott
Laughlin
Subject: Annie
We need to have a conference call all together tonight to discuss how to
move forward with Annie. She has cancer and without treatment would
probably live only a few weeks. Chemotherapy could prolong her life
reasonably comfortably from 6 months to a year. The minimum cost would be
about $1,500. I think it would be best if we all got on the phone together
around 6 - does that work for all of you??
Nancy
(707) 251-4870 (phone)
(707) 265-5446 (fax)
"Plus je bois, mieux je chante"
=====================================
|
1,895 |
Subject: RE: Follow up materials
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/2815.
=====================================
Shooting to get you the balance of the info by noon. Glad to hear it's
useful. Hang in there.
Best,
Jeff
Kari Dohn <[email protected]>
01/03/2001 12:43 PM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: Follow up materials
Jeff, thanks so much! Don't know how I missed this email last night.
Really appreciate it, and look forward to receiving the remaining material.
The Governor referenced the nordpool last night in a session, so this will
make our research alot easier, at least on that one!!!
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2001 6:22 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Follow up materials
Greetings Kari:
Attached is follow-up information from the meeting that the Governor and
you had with Ken Lay and Steve Kean last Thursday. Tomorrow morning I will
email three additional pieces of information:
Our specific comments on the proposals that the Governor raised at the
meeting.
More details on the "demand buy-down" concept.
Information on Norway's version of the ISO, "Nord Pool."
If there's anything you need, don't hesitate to contact me at 415.782.7822.
Happy New Year.
Best,
Jeff
(See attached file: Follow up to Gov Davis-Ken Lay meeting0102.doc)
=====================================
|
1,896 |
Subject: EES and CA rate design
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/10497.
=====================================
Meeting w/ Jay Lewis turned out to be with Scott Stoness and Tamara only.
Their mind was pretty well made up that flat surcharge is best approach. We
prevailed upon them to quantify the impact of several types of rate design,
and the sensitivity of their conclusion to how much of the summer peak load
we can shave.
I also left a message with Gary Weiss telling him Stoness would approach
someone in his organization about how much summer load reduction could
actually be achieved, and asking him to get involved in that process. (I'm
not sure Scott will convinced, so anything you can do to drum up support of
that idea is great.) I think this is the real opportunity to minimize losses.
Sue Mara and I are going to talk to Bob Weisenmueller about likelihood of 5
different types of rate design:
1)flat surcharge
2)big summer bang (Loretta's example)
3)on and off peak based on equal % of market price
4)variation on 2-part Real Time Pricing, where load incremental or
decremental to baseline is priced or credited at market price
5)hybrid of embedded cost and market price, reflective of actual portfolio
mix.
I think 2) or 3) are likely and anything else is a longshot. We'll need to
consider desirability of Enron testimony (also a longshot); but more likely,
identify who we need to partner up with.
=====================================
|
1,897 |
Subject: FW: CAISO Notice: Demand Relief Program Back-up Generator RFB
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/10639.
=====================================
Harry:
Could you forward along to the EES folks we talked to yesterday who're
interested in ISO's demand-side proposal. Thanks.
Best,
Jeff
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Market Participants,
Attached is the California ISO's revised third RFB for Loads with
emergency back-up generators that wish to participate in the ISO Demand
Relief Program (DRP). The ISO would especially like to thank the
participants that submitted bids that included back-up generators into the
first DRP RFB and encourages those participants to submit bids for this
revised RFB.
As mentioned in the March 30 Market Notice for the second DRP RFB (for
Loads not using back-up generators), the design of the back-up generator
program has changed somewhat since the issuance of the first DRP RFB.
Loads using back-up generators will still be dispatched after the DRP Load
blocks but will be available for 24 hours per month, similar to the Load
portion. Successful bidders will start in the program either June 1 or
July 1 depending on how quickly contracts and logistics can be finalized.
Bids are due to the ISO on May 1 in accordance with the attached RFB.
This RFB will also be posted on the ISO Home Page (www.caiso.com) in the
next 24 hours.
<<DRA Third RFB BUG 010403.doc>>
- DRA Third RFB BUG 010403.doc
=====================================
|
1,898 |
Subject: EveMBA Student-To-Student Job Fair 11/27 & 11/28
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/1651.
=====================================
STUDENT TO STUDENT (STS) AND HAAS ALUMNI JOB FAIR
When: 11/27 and 11/28 from 6:00 to 8:30
Where: B of A forum
If you or someone in your company has current openings that you think your
peers in the Evening MBA program and Haas MBA alumni would be interested
in, please plan on participating.
You can use this opportunity to earn a finders fee, if your company pays
for employee referrals. The job fair will be held on both Tuesday and
Wednesday nights. Ideally we would like you to participate both nights, if
you can only attend one night that will be OK. If you will be in class, I
will set up your table and you can come during the break and be available
to answer questions. Other companies will be at their tables from 6-8:30.
There is no charge. You or your companies' representative will staff the
information table, disseminate company literature along with a list of
current openings and be available to answer questions about the jobs/company.
If you are interested in hosting a table, please send all inquiries to John
Morel at
[email protected] or give me a call (510) 642-7731. The deadline
for signing up is 11/21 at 12:00 noon.
John Morel
Associate Director of Career Services
for Evening and Weekend MBA and MBA Alumni
Ph# 510-642-7731
Fax # 510-642-9387
[email protected]
=====================================
|
1,899 |
Subject: IMPORTANT MEETING NOTICE REMINDER/DISCUSSION TOPICS
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/3960.
=====================================
California Energy Solutions Group
980 Ninth Street, Suite 1560
Sacramento, CA 95814
(916) 446-5508 v (916) 446-1499
[email protected]
The California Energy Solutions Group will be meeting as scheduled on:
Friday, December 1, 2000
9:00 am to 12:30 pm
California Chamber of Commerce
1215 K Street, 14th Floor
Enclosed for discussion at Friday's meeting are the following documents:
1. Summary of our Annual Retreat
2. CA ISO Generation Projections and CEC Projections
3. Comprehensive Whitepaper developed by the CA Large Energy Consumers
Association for engendering
discussion on the major issues
4. Governor's Options Paper
5. PG&E Rate Stabilization Plan
6. SCE Rate Stabilization Plan
7. Proposed initiative by Harvey Rosenfeld (outline and press release)
8. Joskow/Kahn Paper on Energy Markets
We hope that everyone can attend this very important meeting. Please contact
our office if you have any questions, need further details or would like to
add anything to the agenda.
Thank you,
Delaney
- CLECA proposal.doc
- PGE Rate Stabilize Plan Nov 2000.doc
- SCE Rate Stabilization Plan Nov 2000.doc
- Governor's options points.doc
- Harvey Rosenfeld proposed initiative.htm
- ISO Projections.doc
- CEC Staff Report - Summer 2001.pdf
- Joskow Kahn Paper 11_21.pdf
- Summary memo.doc
=====================================
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.