dataset_id
int64 0
5.47k
| email_body
stringlengths 800
9.73k
|
|---|---|
1,600 |
Subject: Update On Tyson
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/2939.
=====================================
Few things:
Linda: Thanks very much for the call and the help.Tyson is calling John Doer
(sp?) to try to get him in the loop. And she agreed to send the proposal to
Summers today. Proposal to follow.
I'm working with a guy named Phil Verleger (MIT economist type who worked in
Ford and Carter), who I met at the meeting on Saturday, to come up with a
list of individuals with Democratic, contributor, business community
credientials that can be contacted to seek support for the proposal. Any
suggested contacts that folks have would be helpful.
John Nesslage (who works for Jim) is running some numbers to get an idea of
the size of rate increases required to pay back the loans under a 10-year
term structure
The UC Berkeley econ/biz school faculty members I met with on Saturday want
to issue a press release stating there view on "what not to do" (i.e., don't
have the state take over anything, period). They want to give us a copy to
review for comments/edits before they issue it. I should be getting tonite
or first thing in the AM tomorrow. May not go anywhere, but I told them that
I'd be happy to review it.
Jeff
=====================================
|
1,601 |
Subject: Comments on Proposed Gas Reporting Requirements for California
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/13341.
=====================================
---------------------- Forwarded by Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT on 06/01/2001
03:58 PM ---------------------------
From: Leslie Lawner@ENRON on 06/01/2001 03:57 PM
To: Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:
These comments on FERC's proposed gas reporting requirements are due on June
18. The draft takes the position that the FERC should NOT adopt reporting
requirements for natural gas sellers, which is a different approach than some
of you had discussed earlier. If after reading my very persuasive comments,
the consensus is we should not oppose the reporting requirements but rather
attempt to water them down, I will of course rewrite the comments (or resign
in protest).
On page 6, I make the argument that we do not do our business in the manner
the reporting requirements seem to contemplate. I go through a very high
level description of our "books," but I really do not want to be more
specific, as we then get into proprietary matters. Where we have given FERC
the more detailed description, we have asked for confidential treatment.
Please get comments back to me and Becky as quickly as you can. Thanks.
=====================================
|
1,602 |
Subject: Willie Brown INFO
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/312.
=====================================
Steve --
Alan is on vacation next week. Jeff is tied up. Bryan Gottfredson will be compiling this information.
By the way, there may not be a listing of who (meaning generators) is owed how much - wasn't disclosed in the FERC Settlement.
Jim
-----Original Message-----
From: Kean, Steven J.
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 12:09 PM
To: Steffes, James D.; Comnes, Alan; Dasovich, Jeff
Subject:
Ken is talking to Willie Brown today. He will encourage him to get involved as a facilitator for a comprehensive solution to the California problem. Ken would like to have the following information to provide Brown perhaps next week:
Listing of who is owed how much in California
Listing of the forward contract holders and the relative size of their positions.
Any insights about the correlation (or lack of correlation) between the names on those lists
Listing of the defendants in the class action suits.
The objective is to identify for Brown what his leverage would be (and what benefits could be offered) if he were to convene the parties to work for a comprehensive solution. Please let me know who will take the lead on this.
=====================================
|
1,603 |
Subject: Re: Absence from Class Due to Business Travel
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/427.
=====================================
Jeff Dasovich,
Make sure you are subscribed to the e204-1 alias for course e-mail.
I received a notice after you message that you were not connected.
If you received the e-mail from me with the course syllabus earlier
this week, you probably are on the alias, but you can check with
Shawn Allison at the Evening MBA office <[email protected]>
if you think there is a problem. Just in case, I am attaching the
files (2) with the course syllabus and assignments.
--Tom McCullough
At 08:44 AM 3/23/00 -0600, you wrote:
>Greetings Professor McCullough:
>
>Unfortuanately, I am travelling and had to miss last nite's session. I will
>also miss next week's session due to business travel. I do not anticipate
>having
>to miss any others, however. With respect to the teams, are they assigned,
or
>will we be forming groups ourselves?
>
>Best,
>Jeff
>
- E204OTL_2000-1.doc
- E204OTL_2000-2.doc
=======================================================================
Tom McCullough
Senior Lecturer
Haas School of Business
University of California at Berkeley
==========================================================================
=====================================
|
1,604 |
Subject: Re: FW: Great Bandwidth & Perfect Article
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/2556.
=====================================
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 10/20/2000 01:21 PM -----
Jeff Dasovich
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
10/20/2000 01:21 PM
To: Jane Wilson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Wayne Gardner/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Sue Nord/NA/Enron@Enron, Margo
Reyna/NA/Enron@Enron, Stephen D Burns/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Susan M
Landwehr/HOU/EES@EES, Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT@ECT, Beverley
Ashcroft/LON/ECT@ECT, Mike Dahlke/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, David
Merrill/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@ENRON,
Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@ENRON, Marchris Robinson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Xi Xi/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Lara Leibman/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Susan M Landwehr/HOU/EES@EES, Sue Nord/NA/Enron@ENRON,
Geoffrey Allen/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
cc:
Subject: Re: FW: Great Bandwidth & Perfect Article
FYI. One of our potential competitors. The VP of biz dev at perfect.com is
a very good friend of mine. Please forward to anyone I may have
inadvertently missed.
Best,
Jeff
http://www.destinationcrm.com/ec/dcrm_ec_article.asp?id=64
=====================================
|
1,605 |
Subject: Week 4 Results
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/63.
=====================================
Two new winners for the week - Eldon took first place and Cary took 3rd - we
won't talk about the second place winner.
Another big shift in ranking with Donna, Eldon, Mickey and Steve all moving
up nicely.
No one dropped out of the Last Person Standing pool (those still standing
are indicated by an asterisk)
I would like to introduce our new members for this year:
Barrie Eddy - works at Robert Mondavi. She is the financial manager for the
La Famiglia and Byron brands.
Cary Platkin is an attorney and is in business development with Hungry
Minds. Check out the Website at HungryMinds.com. His wife, Leslie, is an
attorney with Brobeck. They live in San Francisco
Denis Henny is a deputy district attorney for the California Department of
Justice. He lives in San Francisco with his wife, Lynne, who is a financial
forecasting manager for the California State Automobile Association.
Mike & Lisa Herring are the proud parents of TJ who is about 1 1/2. They
live in the East Bay. Mike works with Third Age - check out the Website at
ThirdAge.com.
Next week I'll do send some information on the returning members.
- Scores99.xls
=====================================
|
1,606 |
Subject: Meeting w/PG&E this Friday, Right after DJ's Meeting
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/2253.
=====================================
Hi Evie:
As you know Edison is being, well, Edison about just about everything at the PUC. I think that we actually have some leverage with PG&E, however. I've helped to broker a meeting between large customers and PG&E (Tom Botorff and Dan Richard) this Friday at 1:30 PM after DJ's meeting. DJ and Delainey are organizing
The (basic) idea is to see if there is some way to strike a "reasonable" deal on the DA/cost allocation issues with PG&E, which could then be submitted to PUC around Edison, which seems hell bent on piling as many costs on business customers as possible.
At the first meeting, we want to spend a very brief amount of time determining 1) what matters to people 2) where people on the issues and 3) PG&E's willingness to deal. The goal is to find out if there's any room for a deal. Should not take a long time.
I hope you can attend, since the meeting will be significantly less productive if you're not there, and who knows, it may lead to something that permits us to go around Edison. Likely attendees are CMTA, CLECA, the Chamber, you (hopefully), PG&E and me. Will Mike Kahl be at DJ's meeting?
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
1,607 |
Subject: Former Gore Staffers Join Davis' Energy Team
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/12765.
=====================================
Just in case anyone had any doubts about how Davis is approaching the
issue......
Davis announces four new energy advisors
Updated: May 18, 2001 - 2:54 p.m.
Gov. Gray Davis has added four new advisers to his energy staff, including
members of former Vice President Al Gore's staff and campaign team.
Chris Lehane, former Gore press secretary, and Mark Fabiani, a deputy
campaign manager for the Gore-Lieberman presidential run, will coordinate the
governor's communications staff on energy issues and help recruit a new
director of communications.
Lehane and Fabiani's company will earn $30,000 per month for six months.
Nancy McFadden, former deputy chief of staff to Gore, will earn $118,000 a
year as a senior adviser to the governor, said Steve Maviglio, Davis'
spokesman. McFadden will concentrate on the governor's relations with federal
regulators and with generators.
Davis also has recruited Kellan Fluckiger, chief operations officer for the
Independent System Operator, keeper of the state's power grid.
Fluckiger is "on loan" from the ISO, and will work with energy suppliers,
Maviglio said.
-- Associated Press
=====================================
|
1,608 |
Subject: Fall 2001 schedule
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/12077.
=====================================
>Hi Everyone,
>
>Attached please find your Fall 2001 schedule.
>
> From now until Friday, May 11 you will have an opportunity to add and
> drop classes by e-mailing [email protected] (you may not make changes
> in TELEBEARS).
>
>In your e-mail, please indicate the classes you want to add and drop.
> Other students may want to add your dropped classes and we'd like to let
>them know in May, rather than in August. On Monday, May 21, we will again
>confirm your Fall 2001 class schedule by e-mail and we will export the
>data back to TELEBEARS. Textbooks and readers will be ordered for you
>based on this confirmed schedule. NO CHANGES TO SCHEDULES FROM MAY 12 -
>AUGUST 26.
>
>Classes with waitlists: E210 Competitive Strategy; E252 Negotiations;
>E264 High Tech Marketing; E278 Deals; E291B-1 Speaking for Management;
>E295 Entrepreneurship; E296-2 Business Law.
>
>Thanks,
>
>TJ<x-html>
>Fall 2001 Class Schedule
>
>Dasovich, Jeffrey
>
>CCNCourseTitleWaitlist
>Unit
>Days
>TimeRoom
>
>9441E210Competitive Strategy3
>W6:00PM - C135
>
>9514E252Negotiations3
>M6:00PM - C110
>
>9787E296-1Non-Profit Boards1
>SatC210
></blockquote></x-html>
=====================================
|
1,609 |
Subject: Re: Comments on conference call
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/2556.
=====================================
ool. At keast one Reliant guy is on our side with IEP.
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 12/13/2000 02:22 PM -----
[email protected]
12/13/2000 01:16 PM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Re: Comments on conference call
I'll be on vacation Tuesday, but am reachable by phone. And, yes, my
position is that I want trade associations taking a firm stance in cases
such as we face in Calif.
Having worked with many trade groups over the years, including API, IPAA,
SGA, AGA and the various Mid-Continent O/G assns. as a lobbyist and from a
public affairs standpoint, know a weak assn. does one no good in the long
run. It's imperative that the stronger members drive the process.
Unfortunately, arriving at consensus is far from easy, and many trade
groups would rather let the individual companies get out front because the
assn. can't reach consensus among its wishy-washy members.
We've had to do that somewhat in Calif. and have been working very hard
with selected media on our own to educate them since the issue arose in the
summer. Believe we are making headway, but can't let up now.
RW
=====================================
|
1,610 |
Subject: Quick Update
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/7765.
=====================================
Hi Kari:
I know that you and I are both swamped, so I'm writing very briefly to give
you a brief update. But first, thank you very much again for meeting last
week. Greatly appreciated, and look forward to working together to help in
any way I can to find solution that is acceptable to all. Here's the update:
Our "subcommitte" is meeting tomorrow to try to close the deal on a proposed
solution. It focuses on 3 key areas:
Using the utilities retained assets to moderate prices.
Designing a framework for forward contracting that strikes a much more
appropriate balance in CA between state oversight and the need for utility
flexibility.
Rate stabilization/Undercollections (utility solvency)
I will update you tomorrow on the group's progress. If thing's go according
to plan, we may be in a position to submit something to you a early as
Monday. If there's a deadline from your end that I ought to be aware of, let
me know and I'll incorporate it into the subcommittee's work plan.
In the meantime, if there is anything at all that I can do to help, please
don't hesitiate to contact me.
Thanks again and all the best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
1,611 |
Subject: Re: Global Photon
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/6078.
=====================================
Jeff
Could you forward some contact information when you get a chance.
If my memory serves me well we met with the owner, his wife and their
attorney. I cannot locate their business cards.
Thanks
Kim
----- Forwarded by Kimberly Parrish/Enron Communications on 12/18/00 12:47 PM
-----
Brian Spector
12/18/00 12:42 PM
To: Kimberly Parrish/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
cc: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: Global Photon
definitely get their info and extend congrats. we should try to visit them
again in 1Q to see what's going on. let them know we'd like to do that.
b
Kimberly Parrish
12/18/00 02:31 PM
To: Brian Spector/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
cc: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Global Photon
Friday's Bandwidth Market Report reported Global Photon's regulatory approval
to build their 4-Tbps from San Diego to Morro Bay.
I'm thinking we still consider this company a small fry, but perhaps
congratulations are in order - your thoughts?
I do not have the business cards of the group we met with, but Jeff probably
has their names and e-mails.
Thanks
Kimberly
=====================================
|
1,612 |
Subject: Pizza Dinner next week: Learn about the online community
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/3109.
=====================================
An invitation to ALL EvMBA students:
Learn how YOU can benefit from the online community.
The moment we entered Haas, we became part of a worldwide community of
students, faculty and alumni. Come and join the Haas Alumni Relations
office for a presentation on the Online Community, a powerful tool provided
by the Haas Alumni Network (HAN) to reach a broad network of Haas friends.
Possible uses?? Think job hunting, class project, find old class-mates....
The Online Community will be introduced next week to all EvMBA students
during two
PIZZA DINNERS
on Tuesday Nov 14 and Wed Nov 15 in Room C230 from 7.35 - 8.10 PM
Schedule:
7.35 - Welcome and introduction by Tenny Frost, Director of Alumni relations.
7.40 - Hello and an important message from HAN Board member Peter Loukianoff
(EvMBA 98) / Pamela Horick (EvMBA 96).
7.50 - Overview of the Online Community -- the tool to use
- learn how to sign up and AUTHORIZE THE RELEASE the information you chose
to enter about yourself.
- learn how to research the available data on current students and alumns.
8:00 - Q and A
We hope to see you there!
Alessandro Ratti, EvMBAA VP, Alumni Relations
=====================================
|
1,613 |
Subject: Cross-border conf call
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/cross_border_task_force/5.
=====================================
A quick download on our conference call: We agreed to split the larger group
up into 3 working groups. The 3 of us are in the southern group. (I, for
one, would be happy if all future meetings were held in Mexico City or San
Francisco.) By Feb 29, we are to circulate to the larger group a report on
existing commercial problems along the US/Mexico border, e. g. continuing
difficulties with El Paso Electric and moving power across the border, and
recommendations for their solution. Those recommendations could be much
farther reaching than just a complaint action against the utility.
It is my impression that there could be significant opportunities if we could
move more power south across the border, but that there is real intransigence
on the part of the utilities on this side. I have no idea what the situation
is on the other side of the border.
Why don't we trade emails and voicemails over the next few weeks and try to
schedule a conference call the week of Feb 14? That will give us about 2
weeks to get a written report together and to follow up on our brilliant
discussions. If you have a better idea, let me know.
=====================================
|
1,614 |
Subject: New Hampshire State officials approve electricity deregulation plan
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ["nicholas.o'[email protected]", '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/1171.
=====================================
State officials approve electricity deregulation plan
?
09/05/2000
Associated Press Newswires
Copyright 2000. The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.
?
?
CONCORD, N.H. (AP) - Most state residents will see a 5 percent drop in
electricity rates next month, the first step toward a 15.5 percent decrease,
under a plan approved Tuesday by state utility regulators.
The Public Utilities Commission hasn't yet issued a written order, but voted
unanimously to approve an amended plan that conforms with the wide-ranging
deregulation bill the Legislature passed this year.
?
Public Service Company President Gary Long said if there are no appeals, and
no problems in the details of the written order, customers should be seeing a
16 percent rate drop by the end of the year.
Part of that reduction will be a 5 percent cut by Oct. 1.
Most New Hampshire homeowners would save about $13 off a typical monthly
electric bill under a 15.5 percent rate decrease.
Granite State Electric and the New Hampshire Electric Cooperative already
have restructured themselves to allow their combined 100,000 customers to buy
power from other companies.
=====================================
|
1,615 |
Subject: nan
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/462.
=====================================
Don't hate me for sending a note. What do you think?
"California made two big mistakes: First, they never made a market. They didn't deregulate. They just re-regulated the failed monopoly structure they'd been living with for decades. Second, when the first mistake led to an energy crisis, California's leaders didn't stop, learn from their mistakes, and get deregulation right. Instead, they blamed everyone but themselves, including Enron. Those mistakes led to the nightmare California's been living for over a year now, and they still California still has woken up."
"Enron's the model of the virtual organization. Whether the problem's in California, or India or Sweden, Enron creates the virtual organization needed to solve the problem. That's what we did in California. Houston is definitely the brain, but you need all the other limbs and organs to function well. What makes the "virtual" part of it work is a committed management team, great technology and an incredible team of talented, flexible folks from across the company. That allowed us to coordinate extremely well under challenging conditions. It's been a great experience."
=====================================
|
1,616 |
Subject: Monthly Update to ENA
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/830.
=====================================
Please review and update your sections of the regulatory report by close of
business today, if possible. If you do not have an update, let me know that
as well.
TTT
----- Forwarded by Thane Twiggs/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 10/05/2000 09:39 AM -----
James D Steffes@ENRON
10/03/2000 11:49 AM
To: Thane Twiggs/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Steve Montovano/DUB/EES@EES, Janine Migden/DUB/EES@EES, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Robin Kittel/HOU/EES@EES, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Joe Hillings/Corp/Enron@ENRON, richard shapiro/NA/Enron, Ginger
Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Monthly Update to ENA
Thane -
As we discussed, can you please contact the appropriate people to update this
Worksheet on EGA key activities for ENA. Typically I have based this report
on the IRTF submitted by the different offices (please see last report
attached).
My goal is to have a new report to Tammy Shepard (Dave Delainey's person) by
the 5th of each month. It would be great if we could go over your final
draft on the 4th before sending it in to ENA.
Please call me with any questions.
Cheers,
Jim
=====================================
|
1,617 |
Subject: WGA's Schedules for the Week of May 21 - 25
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/12804.
=====================================
Western Government Affairs
WEEKLY SCHEDULES
For the Week of May 21 - 25, 2001
Paul Kaufman
Mon 5/21 Houston TX
Tue 5/22 Houston TX
Wed 5/23 Portland OR office, a.m.; Helena, p.m.
Thur 5/24 Helana
Fri 5/25 Portland OR office
Sue Mara
Mon 5/21 San Francisco CA office, a.m.;
10 - 4 Real-TIme Pricing Workshop [2 pm Dentist]
Tue 5/22 San Francisco CA office
Wed 5/23 San Francisco CA office
Thur 5/24 ISO Board, Folsom and IEP Board, Sacramento
Fri 5/25 San Francisco CA office, a.m.;
9 - 11 AReM Meeting
Vacation beginning 11:30 am
Jeff Dasovich
Mon 5/21 San Francisco CA office
Tue 5/22 San Francisco CA office
Wed 5/23 San Francisco CA office
Thur 5/24 Vacation
Fri 5/25 Vacation
Sandi McCubbin
Mon 5/21 Sacramento CA
Tue 5/22 Sacramento CA
Wed 5/23 Sacramento CA
Thur 5/24 Sacramento CA
Fri 5/25 Vacation
Mona Petrochko
Mon 5/21 Dallas TX
Tue 5/22 Washington DC
Wed 5/23 Houston TX
Thur 5/24 Houston TX
Fri 5/25 San Francisco CA
Alan Comnes
Mon 5/21 Portland OR office
Tue 5/22 Portland OR office
Wed 5/23 Portland OR office
Thur 5/24 Portland OR office
Fri 5/25 Portland OR office
=====================================
|
1,618 |
Subject: Important Information For SVMG Members
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/810.
=====================================
Dear Jeffrey Dasovich,
Welcome to the new Silicon Valley Manufacturing Group (SVMG) website!
On Friday, October 26, 2001, M3iworks & SVMG proudly launched SVMG's new
website--designed to be the "go-to" site for SVMG member companies,
legislators representing Silicon Valley, and public and private sector
entities concerned about key Silicon Valley quality-of-life issues and what
employers and legislators are doing to address the critical challenges we
face.
With your unique ID we ensure:
* Appropriate access to sensitive site information.
* Personalized view of events, committee information, and other restricted
information--based on roles-based security design.
* Online registration for events--register, see who else is attending, refer
a colleague, get directions, and more...
* Confirmation of event registration and wait-list processing.
* Self-maintenance of user records--update your own individual user
information.
Here is your personal login information:
user id: JD1979
password: 0633
To view and/or update your information please login to the new SVMG site at
http://www.svmg.org/
Thanks,
From the SVMG and M3iworks Team!
=====================================
|
1,619 |
Subject: Expenses Question
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/2224.
=====================================
Rick:
With everything else going on, I apologize for raising this issue, but I'm concerned that if I don't, it may fall through the cracks.
I just realized over the weekend that within the next few weeks, I will have paid the full balance on tuition for the Fall 2001 semester in Berkeley's MBA program that I've been in since 1999. (By the end of this semester, I will have finished 37 of the 40 units that are required to complete the program).
Naturally, I'd like to get reimbursed for the Fall semester's tuition, but I'm concerned that recent events create uncertainty at just about every level of the company.
I know you've got a hell of alot on your plate right now, so there's no need to discuss immediately. I simply wanted to get it on the radar screen. Whenever you get a free minute, give me a ring and we can talk about it further. Take care, and thanks for listening.
Best,
Jeff
PS Given DYN and ENE share prices today, looks like the market loves the combination. That's pretty nice. (Wouldn't know it by what Rebecca Smith keeps writing, though. Gives the impression that she won't be content until we're reduced to ashes--shame.)
=====================================
|
1,620 |
Subject: California Update--09.10.01
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/42.
=====================================
The Senate Rules Committee just met. During the hearing, Senate Leader John Burton stated that:
the Senate intends to rewrite the version of the MOU that the Assembly approved last Thursday night and sent over to the Senate for final approval (SB78).
the version of the MOU that will emerge from the Senate sometime this week will look much more like the bill that originally passed out of the Senate prior to the July summer recess. That bill was unacceptable to Edison and Davis, which led to the version that the Assembly developed and approved last Thursday night.
If the Senate proceeds as Burton suggests, the chances are very low that an MOU will make it through the Legislature and get Davis' signature.
Burton generally sticks to his word. But there is still time for additional negotiations and SB78 could squeak by. However, Burton's comments in the Rules Committee certainly don't help 78's chances for survival.
Finally, the Assembly is currently debating the last surviving windfall profits bill, and the bill is having a hard time getting the votes necessary for passage. More information on the windfall profits bill as we get it.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
1,621 |
Subject: SVMG Media Training Workshop with Tripp Frohlichstein, April 26 &
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/4823.
=====================================
Hello,
You are invited to take part in our annual Media Training Workshop, featuring
Tripp Frohlichstein of Media Masters. He is a "master" at teaching this
program and has done a great job at informing - as well as entertaining -
previous workshop attendees. This year's workshop, helpful to both beginner
and experienced professionals who currently work, or desire to work with the
media, is being held at Cadence Design Systems on April 26th and 27th, 2001,
and is co-sponsored by the San Jose Silicon Valley Chamber of Commerce
The registration fee for this event varies from $100.00 to $250.00.
Please see the attached registration form or click on our "press hat" icon on
the SVMG home page at www.svmg.org, for more information and a further
description on this exciting program.
Please contact Michelle or myself for more information.
Best regards,
Michael Wero
Associate, Communications
Silicon Valley Manufacturing Group
408-501-7862 - p
408-501-7861 - f
Michelle Montague-Bruno
Director, Communications
Silicon Valley Manufacturing Group
408-501-7853 - p
408-501-7861 - f
[email protected]
- media_train_2001_workshop.doc
=====================================
|
1,622 |
Subject: nan
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/9662.
=====================================
My mom got me on this list that sends me a word a day. Thought y'all would
get a kick out of today's word...
Fletcherize (FLECH-uh-ryz) verb tr., intr.
To chew food thoroughly.
[From the practice of chewing food many many times as advocated by Horace
Fletcher, U.S. nutritionist (1849-1919).]
"Dinner table conversation comes to a halt as people around the nation
Fletcherize."
Morsels from Diet History, Florida Today, Oct 19, 1999.
The idea of Fletcherizing invites the question, "Is too much of a good thing
better?" Horace Fletcher proposed that one should grind food once for each
tooth in the mouth. That implies that we masticate each bite of pizza as
many as 32 times. I'd rather stick with the idea that each byte has eight
bits. At any rate, Mr. Fletcher, the art dealer turned nutritionist, did
earn the moniker `The Great Masticator,' for his popular book at the time
and got his name into the dictionary. This week we'll look at more such
words, eponyms, coined after people from fact and from fiction. -Anu
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
=====================================
|
1,623 |
Subject: PUC opens Enron probe
Sender: legal <[email protected]>
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/1015.
=====================================
The good news here is that hearings are scheduled to begin next month, which should give us time to sell the retail book.---sch
Posted at 12:59 p.m. PST Tuesday, Dec. 11, 2001
PUC opens Enron probe
CONTRA COSTA TIMES
State regulators opened an investigation Tuesday to determine how the collapse of Enron might affect electricity supplies in California.
The California Public Utilities Commission said it wanted to guard against possible price increases or operational problems that could arise.
"Enron's sudden financial collapse and ensuing bankruptcy raise a number of concerns," said PUC commissioner Carl Wood.
Enron, once the shining star of fans of energy deregulation, began a free-fall last month after revelations about its accounting practices led investors to lose confidence in the company. It filed for bankruptcy on Dec. 2.
The company had been a big player in the energy trading markets, but generates no electricity of its own in California.
The PUC on Tuesday began asking electric utilities and state electricity officials about how Enron's collapse might affect the state's energy market.
Hearings are scheduled to begin next month.
=====================================
|
1,624 |
Subject: FW: Revised Petition and Points and Authorities
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['Mara', '[email protected]', 'Susan']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/1778.
=====================================
-----Original Message-----
From: Ed Duncan [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2001 12:47 PM
To: Mara, Susan
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Revised Petition and Points and Authorities
Attached is the revised Petition and Points and Authorities (the Sept. 8 Draft"). This draft has not been redlined because the changes and additions are extensive. Future revisions will be redlined.
This draft will be revised to clarify the arguments, to include page references to the exhibits, to include missing authorities, and to eliminate typos, etc.
The argument is that the Commission acted contrary to state and federal constitutional guaranties (a de novo standard of review) and that the Commission acted in excess of its authority and contrary to law thereby abusing its discretion (a substantial evidence standard of review).
You will be provided a revised draft by noon on Monday (Sept 10) which I anticipate will be substantially complete. As soon as it is available, I will send it to you. At that time do you want it also sent to the addressees listed in ypur Friday Email? EWD
- Sept 8 Draft.doc
=====================================
|
1,625 |
Subject: An Inbound Message For You Has Been Quarantined
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/2077.
=====================================
You have received this message because someone has attempted to send you an e-mail from outside of Enron with an attachment type that Enron does not allow into our messaging environment. Your e-mail has been quarantined and is being held at the MailSweeper server.
Sender: [email protected]
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 22:57:43 -0800
Subject: Re: FW:
Attachment Type: Scenarios/Incoming/Inbound PIF Catcher: A filename matching the file mask was detected: 'searchurl.mp3.pif'.
If the intended email is of valid business-related content and you believe it requires Enron resources to retrieve it, you may call your Help Desk and ask to have it released from quarantine and delivered to your e-mail Inbox. Your message will be scanned and checked for viruses prior to requested release. If it contains a virus or there is reason to suspect it is malicious code, it will not be delivered.
North American Resolution Center: 713 853 1411
European Resolution Center: 0044 207 78 36777
EES Help Desk: 888 853 9797
ETS Solution Center: 713 345 4745 (Houston) or 402 398 7454 (Omaha)
Please DO NOT reply to this address as it is not a monitored system mailbox.
=====================================
|
1,626 |
Subject: Two Articles of Interest
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/3767.
=====================================
Senator seeks $2 billion to stabilize power rates
?
The state legislator who pushed for deregulation of the state's energy
industry now wants to set aside $2 billion in state funds to help
prevent the same kind of skyrocketing utility bills that have plagued
the San Diego area, the first California region to be deregulated.
The money could be used for any number of endeavors, including
construction of state-run power plants, purchase of existing privately
owned power plants or the takeover of the transmission system for
energy in California, said Sen. Steve Peace, D-El Cajon, chairman of
the powerful Senate Budget Committee.
http://www.capitolalert.com/news/capalert06_20001121.html
?
State contradicts power concerns
?
Contradicting months of dire warnings from energy suppliers, state
officials Monday said California should have enough electricity to
meet next summer's demands.? While stressing that new power plants
still will be needed in the near future, California Energy Commission
officials said the threat of blackouts and severe cutbacks next summer
now seem unlikely.
http://www0.mercurycenter.com/local/center/energy1121.htm
=====================================
|
1,627 |
Subject: CA Legislative update on DA issues
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/10339.
=====================================
AB 21X (Direct Access bill):
likely to pass out of the Asembly today; uncertain when it will go to
Senate. Here are highlights: ("effective date" is likely to be around July
1, if it moves through)
before effective date, customer can go DA without limitation
existing DA can stay DA
after effective date, customer can go DA upon payment of exit fee based on
DWR's unavoidable costs
after effective date, customer can go DA w/o exit fee if using self-gen or
cogen and with 180 days advance notice
re-entry fee applies for return to bundled service from DA, unless 12 months
advance notice is given
AB 8X (San Diego rate freeze and QF provisions bill):
in Senate Energy today but under heavy pressure by QFs who are opposed to it
establishes 6.5 cent ceiling price for SDGE large customers
ceiling effective Feb 7 through end of PG&E/SCE rate freeze
commission may adjust the ceiling, if in the public interest
The San Diego language has been coupled with other language concerning QF
payment (and bond issuance). This should further delay any action.
We should have more information from Sandi McCubbin on the progress of both
of these bills Friday.
=====================================
|
1,628 |
Subject: Re: Issues for Mtg with Delainey on 2-28-01
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/3430.
=====================================
It's always darkest before the light (though it may not get light in our
lifetimes).
Looks great. Couple of points:
1) Despite promises to the contrary--common theme in this exercise--Burton
(as I understand) did not remove the condemnation (expropriation?) language
from ABx6, i.e., the state can just take your power plant (or anything else,
it seems), if it has the inkling. That's an egregious provision in ABx6.
2) I don't recall trying to amend ABx18 to say, "pay them their PX credits."
I understood the tactic to be--get a prospective, date certain end to the
freeze in the bill, which then gives us very firm legal ground on which to
seek and get the money owed to us. We could seek the additional language,
but if putting date certain does the same thing without attracting a lot of
attention, may be a preferable path.
3) Forgive me if I've just overlooked it, but I got wind of a bill by Ms
Migden (ABx8?) that gives one whole heckuvalot of new power--power usually
left to FERC--to the CA Electricity Oversight Board. Anyone know about it?
We may want to get details for inclusion in the discussion with Delainey.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
1,629 |
Subject: Initial contacts re continuance of Negative CTC complaints
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/10289.
=====================================
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/21/2001 04:34 PM -----
MDay <[email protected]>
03/21/2001 04:11 PM
To: "'Mike D Smith'" <[email protected]>, "'Jeff Dasovich Enron SF'"
<[email protected]>, "'Sandi McCubbin Enron SF'" <[email protected]>, "'Sue
Mara at Enron SF'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Initial contacts re continuance of Negative CTC complaints
I spoke with ABAG attorney Kenneth Moy and APS attorney Dan Douglas.
Neither was thrilled with the Wood/Barnett draw, but neither was immediately
warm to the notion of a negotiated continuance. I outlined the arguments
against charging into the guns of Wood and Barnett, and reminded them that
there could very likely be delays anyway as a result of the CPUC's continued
indecision about the end of the rate freeze--which looks to be increasing as
a result of the Administration's deadlock with the utilities. They both
indicated that they would discuss the matter with their clients and get back
to us shortly. I suspect at least one of them will say "no we want to go
ahead even if you do not." As soon as I hear from them, I will contact SCE
and PG&E. Mike Day
=====================================
|
1,630 |
Subject: Edwards AFB
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/edwards_air_force/3.
=====================================
FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by William Gang/HOU/EES on 12/17/99 12:53 PM
---------------------------
William Gang
12/17/99 10:48 AM
To: Robert Frank/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Edwards AFB
Have you had a chance to take a cut at that transaction description for
Edwards yet? I would like to get it to them for their chop this week, if
possible. There has been a local storm of feces for employing outside
counsel (Squeri) apparently without Ms. Sharp's approval. I don't know what
procedures Regulatory uses for outside counsel, but I have had to tell Jeff
that I can't pitch in and pay for a part of Joe any more. My boss got his
tail twisted, and now apparently has to respond to Pai/White on the matter.
Also, let's please discuss the strategic status of Edwards and how to go
forward. Since Bear Trap yesterday, Edwards has been removed from the list
of authorized projects to pursue because it does not meet the TVC
threshhold. However, I think its strategic value is such that we should not
cavalierly cast it aside. What do you think?
Please give me a call. I tried to contact you, but, alas, your line is as
busy as usual.
=====================================
|
1,631 |
Subject: Re: Appeal Rights
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/5997.
=====================================
The conference call has been scheduled for today, December 28, 2000 at 7:00
p.m. CST. The call-in number is (800) 991-9019, passcode: 6045742,
confirmation: 3335288. Should you have any questions regarding this
information, please call me at (713) 345-5965. Thank you.
Robert C Williams@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
12/28/2000 11:52 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich@EES, [email protected], Vicki Sharp@EES, Mike D Smith@EES
cc: Stephanie Truss@ENRON
Subject: Appeal Rights
Mike Day,
I have asked my assistant to set up a conference call for this evening to
discuss preserving our argments and rights of appeal, both generally and
specifically (with respect to the negative CTC issue), during and after the
present hearing. I know that we covered some of this in our previous call,
and that a record on due process is being made, but I'd like for all of us to
explore whether there is anything else we should be doing now, and what, if
anything, we will need to do after the proceeding is concluded. I will see
if Larry Mollman from Brobeck can join us as well for the state court
litigation perspective. Stephanie will circulate the call-in information.
Thanks.
=====================================
|
1,632 |
Subject: Re: ICAs
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/5497.
=====================================
Thanks Jeremy. I did receive the fax. We are currently working internally
at finalizing the tariff, which should be done well in advance of the April
anniversary. Will keep you posted on progress.
Jeremy Meier <[email protected]> on 02/02/2001 04:17:14 PM
To: [email protected]
cc: [email protected]
Subject: ICAs
Mona:
Trust you got the faxed CPUC Decisions on ETI - the first granted the
CLC CPCN and the second corrects the ALJ's overlooking of the NDIEC
(what you might call IXC) authority.
We still need, as you probably have heard before, to file the final
initial tariffs per the Decisions. Jeff and/or Sue was going to approve
consumer forms and final service language, and we should file those no
later than April (one year), if not sooner. Otherwise, you can get an
extension on exercising ETI's authority if necessary.
Also note that if ETI is using network facilities in Sacramento area
(collocation, etc) we will likely want to execute ICAs with Citizens and
Roseville in that area (small ILECs). We can send additional ICAs for
these ILECs (and for Pacific and GTEC/Verizon) as warranted.
Thx.
Jeremy Meier
Blumenfeld & Cohen
=====================================
|
1,633 |
Subject: RE: Message Points for Discussion with Bilas
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/165.
=====================================
Looks good to go.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 4:12 PM
To: Shapiro, Richard
Subject: Message Points for Discussion with Bilas
The "rate agreement" between the California PUC and DWR is a monumental decision that will affect California ratepayers and the economy for decades.
Virtually every stakeholder has complained about DWR's refusal to provide the information necessary to assess the validity of DWR's assessment of what it's "rate requirement" is.
Absent a "rate agreement" that provides for public scrutiny at the Public Utilities Commission, there will be no public scrutiny of DWR's revenue requirement and no accountability applied to DWR's actions.
The stakes are simply too high--$43 billion of contracts--to let that happen.
There is ample time for 1) California to issue the bonds AND 2) the Commission to engage in the deliberation necessary to ensure that a) DWR provides the information necessary to assess its TRUE revenue requirement, b) DWR's actions are subject to public scrutiny now and going forward.
In short, this is one time when Loretta Lynch has it it right. Give her a helping hand.
=====================================
|
1,634 |
Subject: Re: Weekly Staff meeting?
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/943.
=====================================
yep.
Joseph Alamo 07/10/2001 07:31 PM To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron cc: Subject: Re: Weekly Staff meeting?
so -- 8:30 Thursday okay with both of you??
From: Jeff Dasovich on 07/10/2001 12:07 PM CDT
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Alan Comnes/ENRON@enronXgate, Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron@ENRON, Paul Kaufman/Enron@EnronXGate
Subject: Re: Weekly Staff meeting?
That's true, but we're trying to find substantive reasons for having the meeting....
Susan J Mara 07/10/2001 12:05 PM To: Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Alan Comnes/ENRON@enronXgate, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron Subject: Re: Weekly Staff meeting?
Paul specifically told us to have one
Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
Joseph Alamo 07/10/2001 09:41 AM To: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron, Alan Comnes/ENRON@enronXgate cc: Subject: Weekly Staff meeting?
Did you folks want to try to have a Staff meeting/call this week?
or would you rather let it go until Paul returns?
Pls advise,
Thanks,
Joseph
<Embedded StdOleLink>
<Embedded StdOleLink>
<Embedded StdOleLink>
=====================================
|
1,635 |
Subject: Re: Time Warner
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/11813.
=====================================
Dudes:
I'm am officially responsible for the case and of course appreciate all
Dylan's (and everyone else's) efforts. Here's my game plan. I'm going to
spend the day working on it---adding to what's already been passed around.
Dylan, I'll look at the numbers and perhaps send you (and others) thoughts
regarding the crunching, since you've already starting crunching. I'll try
to do as much of the write-up (building on what others have done) and send
around by COB today. Once everyone's had a chance to comment, etc. I'll
finalize tomorrow night. I have to fly to Houston at the crack of dawn on
Monday and therefore can't go to class, so I'm hoping that someone else can
turn it in. Let me know if this works for folks.
Best,
Jeff
Dylan Windham <[email protected]>
04/28/2001 01:02 AM
To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected]
cc:
Subject: Time Warner
I am sorry guys. I have been working on the pro forma P&L numbers for the
mergers and have not finished them. I have a Saturday class tomorrow, and
I will try to send it to you as soon as I can.
Dylan
=====================================
|
1,636 |
Subject: Re: FERC proxy price in CA
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/11827.
=====================================
Seems very likely that someone else notified DJ of this posting. Might be
useful for our traders to understand that scrutiny in the short run is going
to be signficant.
Best,
Jeff
Karen Denne
06/29/2001 05:03 PM
To: Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Vance
Meyer/NA/Enron@ENRON, Meredith Philipp/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: FERC proxy price in CA
I got a call from Dow Jones today about a price we had posted on EnronOnline
for day-ahead power at Mead for $105/MWh (the FERC proxy price is $91.87). I
talked to Tim Belden and just because an offer is posted doesn't mean that
there's been a transaction. Turns out that under our interpretation of the
FERC order, because Friday for Monday transactions exceed the 24-hour
delivery requirement, we believe they're exempt from the order. Tim said
that at the end of today, we had done five transactions above the cap, but
they decided to lower the transaction price to the proxy price so we'd reduce
any further exposure and scrutiny.
=====================================
|
1,637 |
Subject: Section 214 Licensing - follow-up
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/2337.
=====================================
To follow-up on the section 214 licensing issue, I spoke with Robin Hill and
found out that Networks YK is 100% owned by the Netherlands BV, which in turn
is 100% owned by EBS, Inc.
In addition, my contact at the FCC confirmed that, with our existing
ownership structure, Networks YK would be able to use the 214 authority of
EBS, Inc. As a result, EBS, Inc., would need to send a one-paragraph letter
to the Secretary of the FCC (and a copy to the Telecommunications Division of
the International Bureau) referencing its license number to invoke
authorization and listing its intervening subsidiaries to better assist the
FCC with identifying the chain. In addition, we would need to certify in the
letter that the chain is entirely 100%-owned, which is not a problem in this
case -- but an issue that we will need to monitor and address in the future
with regard to other foreign entities.
Finally, this is a one-time notification process. The only cause for
providing additional notification relates to a change in ownership of the
subsidiary or a name change.
Please let me know if anyone has any other questions or concerns.
Regards,
Lara
=====================================
|
1,638 |
Subject: Re(2): SCE AL-1410 re standby rates and interconnection
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/interconnection/13.
=====================================
We had been in discussions with SCE a few months back to remove the QF
requirement in their Rule 21. At the time they said they "could" not
because the construct of their standby rate did not provide adequately
provide recovery for standby service (particularly for non-demand related
tariff schedules). The rejection was were we left the subject with SCE.
Their move to submit an advice letter on the subject comes as a surprise
to me given their prior response.
We will not be protesting with the presumption that the standby tariff
would not prejudice future work on standby tariff rate design. Generally
speaking, the QF requirement is ridiculous and should be removed
immediately. For this reason, we are supportive of it happening now
through this advice filing. I do not want to see the prohibition against
non-QF facilities for up to another 9 months (rough estimate based on
time-frame articulated in the DG order).
[email protected] writes:
>
>
>shouldn't this be the subject of the upcoming cec workshops? isn't the
>timing
>of the filing, well, awkward? wouldn't it be better if they withdrew and
>brought as a proposal to the workshops?
>
>
=====================================
|
1,639 |
Subject: CA Power Issue
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/643.
=====================================
Attached are some articles concerning further development and elaboration on
the California power crisis and testimony to the Senate Energy, Utilities and
Communications Committee by the CEO of CAL-ISO concerning the power
issues/problems.
Testimony before Senate Energy, Utilities & Communications Committee And the
Assembly Utilities & Commerce Committee
By Terry M. Winter, President and CEO
California Independent System Operator
August 10, 2000
An August 10th article from Natural Gas Intelligence that talks of the
defensive posture the California Independent System Operator (Cal-ISO) has
taken concerning the accusations that Governor Davis' emergency electricity
report had made about the new deregulated market.
An article from Natural Gas Intelligence talks about the vote, on July 31st,
by the California Independent System Operator (Cal-ISO) Board to move the
price cap to $250. The pros and cons of the price cap are mentioned, as well
as other remedies for the power situation. Also, there are several comments
in the article from California Senator Steve Peace on how "dysfunctional" the
market is and why it should be restructured.
=====================================
|
1,640 |
Subject: CADER'S DG 2001 CONFERENCE
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/723.
=====================================
!! CADER'S DG 2001 CONFERENCE !!
CADER's 3rd Annual International Symposium "Distributed Generation: Opportunities and Obstacles" will be held as scheduled on November 1-2, 2001 at the Catamaran Resort Hotel in San Diego.
Registration at the regular rates is still available. If you haven't registered yet, do so now. You should be there to network and mingle with some 250 fellow dg enthusiasts.
Twenty-three sponsors will be showing you the latest in distributed energy resource technologies. Over fifty speakers will provide you the latest and greatest in recent developments in fiancing, DG initiatives, deployment and comercialization issues, control & communication, standards and codes and more..... with a focus on case studies.
For the latest information on the Agenda, and registration details, please see www.cader.org
To facilitate your planning, San Diego's gorgeous Catamaran Resort Hotel has graciously extended the special rate deadline. Contact the hotel at 800-422-8386 or http://www.catamaranresort.com/cad1030.html
Call Jairam Gopal (916) 654-4880 or Michael Theroux (530) 823-7300 ext. 203 or Betsie Brown (858) 794-7355 if you have any questions.
>
=====================================
|
1,641 |
Subject: Meeting with Perfect Commerce
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/289.
=====================================
Greg:
Good talking to you. Congratulations on your new role. Sounds exciting (in addition to exhausting).
Based on our call, I contacted Perfect Commerce. The two folks from their shop that will be in Houston are:
Ian Sullivan
SVP, Professional Services and all implementation of the product
Cameron Sellers
VP, Business Development
They'd like to meet sometime during the week of October 15th. Let me know if that works for you and Brad. Or if you'd like to contact them directly, just let me know and I'll get you their numbers/emails.
I ran across Perfect when I was doing an MBA project--we were required to find a company that we could consult to on e-commerce strategy.
I've since found out that Perfect's doing a pilot with EES--acting as the e-procurment platform for products tied to EES' outsourcing deals. From what I hear it's going well, and EES is enthusiastic.
The technology is very interesting: soup to nuts e-procurement platform developed by Paul Milgrom (global auction guru and economist at Stanford). Glad you guys can meet with them. I think it's definitely worth the time--the technology may fit very well with Networks.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
1,642 |
Subject: Updated PRD...
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/mba__e_commerce/20.
=====================================
Jeff,
Sorry for the delay in the sending the PRD. If you still want to chat
tomorrow, feel free to give me a call. I am scheduled in multiple meetings
throughout the day but will return your call if I am not at my desk.
My number is 650-858-1920.
Best Regards,
Mike Davenport
-----Original Message-----
From: Cameron Sellers
Sent: Monday, March 20, 2000 1:12 PM
To: Mike Davenport
Cc: 'Jeff Dasovich'; '[email protected]'
Subject: FW:
The contact at Haas is Jeff Dasovich and his email address is
[email protected].
His work phone number (daytime) is: (415) 782-7822
Could you please send him the PRD as soon as you get it from Cherryl
tomorrow.
Thank you so much!!
Cameron
Cameron Sellers
Vice President, Business Development
PERFECT.COM
1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210
Palo Alto, CA 94303
[email protected]
650.858.7719 (direct dial)
650.858.1095 (fax)
650.208.9455 (cell)
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, March 20, 2000 12:14 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE:
already got the MRD. Just need the PRD. Tomorrow's just dandy.
- PRD Final Version 1.0.0.doc
=====================================
|
1,643 |
Subject: Reminder: * Working Council Meeting 6/7*
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/2727.
=====================================
This e-mail serves as a reminder for the June Working Council meeting. The
details for this meeting are listed below.
DATE: June 7, 2001
TIME: 8:00 -- 10:15 AM
LOCATION: Microsoft
1065 La Avenida, Bldg. 1
Mountain View, CA.
*Please note that there are two additional action items on the agenda*
AND
Please join us for Special Guest Tal Finney, Senior Policy Director to
Governor Gray Davis. In his capacity as Policy Director, Tal plays a
leading role in the Administration on Technology Issues, the Energy Crisis
through his role as a member of the CA ISO Board, and key quality of life
issues impacting Silicon Valley. This is a great opportunity to hear
directly from the Administration, and will provide you with the chance to
ask questions of importance to your company and the Valley.
The details for this meeting including a map to the
meeting location and agenda items for the June 7, Working Council meeting
on the SVMG web site at www.svmg.org under "events" or go to link below:
To access Working Council information:
user: working
password: councilmember
To confirm your attendance please call Carla at 408-501-7864, or e-mail me
at [email protected].
=====================================
|
1,644 |
Subject: Re: Summary of Supply Offers in California
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/10234.
=====================================
The only one that I don't see is the SDG&E offer from Parquet last year.
Jim
Jeff Dasovich
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
03/19/2001 08:24 PM
To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron,
[email protected], Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron,
Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Karen
Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, [email protected], Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Summary of Supply Offers in California
Jim:
Attached is a fairly distilled summary of the projects Enron's offered to the
utilities, DWR and the ISO over the past 9-12 months, or so. With respect to
the power contracts offered to the IOUs, only the offers accepted by PG&E and
Edison are included---the desk doesn't keep records of offers rejected, only
offers accepted. However, I'm fairly confident that I can dig deeper and get
more info on the other power deals offered to Edison, PG&E and SDG&E if folks
would like that information. Just let me know. Prices are included for the
offers that had prices attached when submitted.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
1,645 |
Subject: RE: FERC refund investigation into Pacific Northwest spot power
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/1386.
=====================================
Thanks very much.
-----Original Message-----
From: Frank, Robert
Sent: Wed 10/3/2001 5:50 AM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Cc:
Subject: FW: FERC refund investigation into Pacific Northwest spot power sales
Hey Jeff -see memo attached; it contains good quotes from the ruling on the key issues. Let me know if you need anything else. -Bob
-----Original Message-----
From: Frank, Robert
Sent: Thu 9/27/2001 2:07 PM
To: Kean, Steven J.; Shapiro, Richard; Steffes, James D.; Comnes, Alan; Alvarez, Ray; Walton, Steve; Mara, Susan; Lawner, Leslie; Cantrell, Rebecca W.; Fulton, Donna; Dasovich, Jeff; Nicolay, Christi L.; Allen, Phillip K.; Perrino, Dave; Black, Don; Frank, Robert; Miller, Stephanie; Tycholiz, Barry; Novosel, Sarah; Thome, Jennifer; Hall, Steve C. (Legal); Lindberg, Susan; Sanders, Richard B.
Cc:
Subject: FERC refund investigation into Pacific Northwest spot power sales
Attached is a memo outlining key aspects of the recommendation issued by the assigned Administrative Law Judge in the above-referenced case. The recommendation is now before the full Commission, which we expect will rule by mid-October. Please call me if you have any questions.
=====================================
|
1,646 |
Subject: PX Proposed Code of Conduct for Review and Comments
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/685.
=====================================
Attached, for your review and comments, is the proposed Code of Conduct and
the
associated documents that will become a part of the California Power Exchange
Corporation ("PX") Tariff. The PX will be holding stakeholder meetings to
discuss the above named documents early in September. An invitation and
details
will be sent once the dates and times are finalized.
(See attached file: Code of Conduct Memo 8_18_00.pdf)(See attached file:
Revisions to Tariff Relating to Confidentiality Draft 8_16_00.pdf)(See
attached
file: Code of Conduct Schedule 5 Draft 8_16_00.pdf)(See attached file: Code of
Conduct Schedule 5 Section 9 Draft 8_16_00.pdf)(See attached file: Code of
Conduct Schedule 11 Draft 8_16_00.pdf)
Please send any comments or questions related to the proposed Code of Conduct
to
Gene Waas, Manager of Regulatory Affairs, at [email protected] by September 18,
2000.
Sincerely,
Larry Lau
- Code of Conduct Memo 8_18_00.pdf
- Revisions to Tariff Relating to Confidentiality Draft 8_16_00.pdf
- Code of Conduct Schedule 5 Draft 8_16_00.pdf
- Code of Conduct Schedule 5 Section 9 Draft 8_16_00.pdf
- Code of Conduct Schedule 11 Draft 8_16_00.pdf
=====================================
|
1,647 |
Subject: Re: one-unit courses for Fall 2001
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/4436.
=====================================
Hi TJ:
Work has prevented me from being on campus this week. I registered for
1-unit courses, but have not "signed up" in the office. If that is
mandatory, please let me know and my girlfriend---a student in the day
program who will be there today---can sign me up.
Best,
Jeff
Teresa Janus <[email protected]>
Sent by: [email protected]
05/02/2001 07:48 PM
Please respond to Teresa Janus
To: [email protected]
cc: [email protected]
Subject: one-unit courses for Fall 2001
Hi,
ONE-UNIT COURSES:
The demand for one-unit courses is very high, as outlined in the Student
Handbook. It is uncommon for a student to be given a space in more than
ONE one-unit course per semester.
If you got into your 1st choice of a 1-unit class for Fall 2001, you will
not be put on a waitlist for your 2nd choice at this time. After classes
start in the Fall, if there is room available in any of the 1-units, we'll
let you know. Adds will be based on seniority in the program.
Thanks!
You'll be given a chance to update your schedules May 4 - May 11.
I will e-mail your Fall 2001 schedules to you this Friday.
Thanks!
TJ
=====================================
|
1,648 |
Subject: EBS Regulatory Issues
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/614.
=====================================
Part 2 ...
----- Forwarded by Scott Bolton/Enron Communications on 06/30/00 11:51 AM
-----
Scott Bolton
06/28/00 03:54 PM
To: Scott Yeager/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
cc: Donald Lassere/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Sue
Nord/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Stephen D
Burns/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: EBS Regulatory Issues
Scott,
Cynthia Sandherr forwarded to me the email and presentation you sent her.
Many of the issues you raised we have been working on for some time, as well
as the Wasabi-related issues that were raised on our recent conference call.
I'd like to set up a time to in the next few days where Donald Lassere and I
can brief you on our political and regulatory strategy at both the state and
federal levels, as well as follow up with you on the issues raised on the
Wasabi call with the DC lawyer. We'd like to get your input, as well as
better describe the group Enron has put in place to support EBS. Please let
me know your availability.
Best,
Scott
_______________
Scott Bolton
Director, Government and Regulatory Affairs
Enron Corp.
(503) 886-0360 office
(503) 807-2935 cell
=====================================
|
1,649 |
Subject: Giants Game - May 13th - Please Respond ASAP
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/4342.
=====================================
To celebrate the end of another semester (and the Program for some), I looked
into purchasing a block of tickets to a SF Giants game at Pac Bell Park.? We
have the opportunity to purchase up to 90 tickets at $16/ticket for the game
against the New York Mets on Sunday, May 13th at 1:05pm.? Seats are in the
View Reserved Area (i.e., upper deck).
* * Please let me know ASAP how many tickets you would like. * *?
Feel free to invite friends and family as well.? I will place the order based
on your initial response, so only respond if you are definitely interested.?
GO GIANTS!
- Carolyn
Carolyn M. Vavrek
Manager - Human Capital Advisory Services
Deloitte & Touche
50 Fremont Street
San Francisco, CA? 94105
phone: 415-783-5137
fax: 415-783-8760
e-mail: [email protected]
This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information
intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law.? If
you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and are
hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this
message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.
=====================================
|
1,650 |
Subject: Christmas presents--we've picked the names
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/1286.
=====================================
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 12/11/2000 09:59 AM -----
[email protected]
12/10/2000 04:39 PM
To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Christmas presents--we've picked the names
Merry Christmas to all!
Thanks to Jeff for picking the names.
The list is below; buyer on the left, recipient is on the right. Now our
shopping can begin....
Mom buys for Debbie
Jeff Mike
Prentice Steve
Robert Charry
Dad Nancy
Steve Robert
Nancy Jeff
Charry Prentice
Mike Mom
Debbie Dad
Jeff, please forward this to Prentice. I will call Mom and Dad.
Finally, Mike and I are hosting Christmas Day at our house with a big assist
from Jeff on the dinner preparation. I will probably do it the same way we
do Thanksgiving at Steve and Charry's by asking each of you to bring/make
something. We are looking forward to having you all here.
Debbie
=====================================
|
1,651 |
Subject: California gas intrastate matters - July 11 conference call
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/12148.
=====================================
Here is the information for the conference call.
Wednesday, July 11
1:00 to 2:00 p.m. Central Time
dial-in number: 800-486-2460
participant code: 675-923
host code (Lawner): 263-406
Leslie, if you need assistance during the call, please press "# 0".
From: Leslie Lawner@ENRON on 07/06/2001 09:32 AM
To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna
Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Stephanie Miller/Enron@EnronXGate, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Roger O Ponce/HOU/EES@EES, Mark
Courtney/HOU/EES@EES, Greg Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Marianne Castano/HOU/EES@EES,
Donald M Black/Enron@EnronXGate, Phillip K Allen/Enron@EnronXGate
cc: Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/Enron@EnronXGate, Rubena
Buerger/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: California gas intrastate matters
There will be a conference call Wed. at 1:00 pm Central, July 11, to discuss
California intrastate gas issues. Rubena Buerger will send out the call in
information.
Items to be addressed are: LDC hedging, unbundling rates and infrastructure
needs. Jeff Dasovich will give us a status report on these issues and we then
discuss where to go from there.
=====================================
|
1,652 |
Subject: URGENT: REQUEST TO PRODUCE AS MUCH POWER AS POSSIBLE
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/4712.
=====================================
California Senator Feinstein, Governor Davis, Secretary of Energy
Richardson, and FERC Commissioner Hoecker held a joint press conference
related to the California energy problem.? They indicated a critical need
for supply TODAY to serve the California marketplace.? Secretary Richardson
indicated he will exercise his emergency power under the Federal Power Act
[section 202(c)] to direct generation to California.? The Secretary
indicated that DOE, under the FPA, will set a fair price for the power.
?
IEP requests all its members to deliver?as much generation as possible to
California ASAP in order to avert potential shortages.?
?
In addition, the Governor and Senator Feinstein called for regionwide price
caps and mandatory, reasonable long-term contracts between generators and
the utilities.? They made the point that 4,000 - 5,000 MWs are being
exported from the state, currently a lack of adequate planning and
scheduling of resources/planned outages exists, and indicated that the CPUC
would moved to implement forward contracting.?
?
IEP will forward the formal statement from the Press Conference (or a
summary) as soon as available.
=====================================
|
1,653 |
Subject: RE: Answers
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/5283.
=====================================
got your messages + attachments and mark's - WOW + THANKS!!
also calc'd it all myself
will review + compare + send around comments
-cv
Carolyn M. Vavrek
Manager - Human Capital Advisory Services
Deloitte & Touche
50 Fremont Street
San Francisco, CA? 94105
phone: 415-783-5137
fax: 415-783-8760
e-mail: [email protected]
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2001 8:26 PM
To: Mark Guinney
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]
Subject: Re: Answers
Since it seems like folks may have only been sporadically receiving my
emails, please let me know if you receive the memos and accompanying
spreadsheets that I just sent.? Thanks.
Best,
Jeff
This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information
intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law.? If
you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and are
hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this
message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.
=====================================
|
1,654 |
Subject: Re: WESTERN Regulatory Strategy
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/889.
=====================================
Thursday, 9.7, works for me for meeting #1.
James D Steffes
08/29/2000 07:05 PM
To: Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Harry
Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Marcia A Linton/NA/Enron@Enron (bcc: Jeff
Dasovich/SFO/EES)
Subject: WESTERN Regulatory Strategy
Paul, Joe, & Harry --
We've all talked about holding a meeting to outline our strategy for the next
12 months in the Western states (wholesale and retail) and so I propose the
following.
1. GA Strategy Meeting
We should come together as just GA before meeting with the business people.
I think that we want to have the following people in attendance (like your
input) - Paul Kaufman, Joe Hartsoe, Sarah Novosel, Mary Hain, Marcie Milner,
Steve Walton, Jim Steffes, Harry Kingerski, Sue Mara, Jeff Dasovich, Bruno
Gaillard, Mona Petrochko, Sandi McCubbin.
The meeting output would be a Strategy and Tactics Plan for June 2000 - June
2001.
2. GA meeting w/ Business People
A few of us could go to Belden, Calger, Yang, Benevides, Condon to discuss
the above.
I would like to have these meetings soon (maybe Thursday, Sept 7 for #1).
Please let me know.
Jim
=====================================
|
1,655 |
Subject: Re: California Congressman
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/2141.
=====================================
Sandy: yes; it is a loss as both Rogan and Bilbray would have voted with us
on restructuring. Lewis would not give up Appropriations where he is a
Cardinal. Herger would not give up Ways & Means. Rohrabacher would have to
give up International Relations which might be a possibility we could check
out. But, do you believe Rohrabacher would be free-market on electricity
issues???? He is awful on free trade issues and supports sanctions. The
National Foreign Trade Council gave him an "F" score.
But, hence, herein lies the problem. Some of the best in the delegation are
already on top-tier Committees and will not move while those willing to move
might not be good on our issues. Other ideas????? Thanks.
Sandra McCubbin
12/01/2000 12:47 PM
To: Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tom Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: California Congressman
with Rogan gone, the delegation suffers, the two that you mentioned are
definite possiblilites..would Lewis, Rohbacher or Herger have any
interest..they might be good..
=====================================
|
1,656 |
Subject: ICAF to San Francisco, week of April 8
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/5794.
=====================================
Jeff - Cynthia Sandherr said you were once again the person to write to. We
talked in the fall of 1999 when I was thinking about bringing the energy
seminar to San Franciso in 2000.
?
17 in our group this year, really interested in gas and elec matters,
especially in CA. 14 students including a BGen from Croatia, and 3 faculty.
?
At this point, I am trying to juggle between an open Monday afternoon 9
April, and a very early possible morning appt on Thursday a.m., 12 April. We
have asked CPUC to host us the afternoon of 11 April, but they may back out
given the circumstances, but for the moment that time is spoken for.
?
We did manage Alaska last year after all, so now I am trying to resume the
regular alternation between California and Houston. I am several shades
whiter of head as a result of bringing the Alaska trip to closure.
?
Draft schedule attached for your consideration of where we are in the
planning process.
?
Best regards,
?
Maureen Crandall
Professor of Economics
Industrial College of the Armed Forces
National Defense University
Fort McNair, DC 20319
tel (202) 685-4319?? fax(202) 685-4175
- IS2001 dom trav California.doc
=====================================
|
1,657 |
Subject: SPAM: Class Survey for Joggers & Walkers
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/1.
=====================================
Are you a jogger or walker? I would like to know your opinions by getting your answers to this survey. Thank you in advance for your survey participation and feedback.
Go to: http://www.zoomerang.com/survey.zgi?RVVNX3CVLM6SB2X3YSNS8PB0
Please click this link now (or go online and retype the address into your Web
browser). If you do not want to take this or other surveys, please click "reply" and
ask the survey creator to remove you from the email list.
Zoomerang is a survey clearinghouse. We do not censor the questions or
messages in the surveys or the invitations to take surveys that third
parties may propound, nor do we censor the responses you may provide. The
sender of a survey is solely responsible for the subject matter and contents
of the survey invitation and survey in which you participate, and you are
solely responsible for the contents of your response.
According to Zoomerang's Terms of Agreement, <http://www.zoomerang.com/join/terms-of-agreement.html> survey senders
promise that they have an ongoing business or personal relationship or they've obtained
consent to send emails to survey recipients. Please send questions to [email protected].
=====================================
|
1,658 |
Subject: My Additions -- Nov 22 draft comments _WPTF
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/3717.
=====================================
Here is WPTF's draft with my additions. It proposes going with Hebert's
formula. I added some language to have the starting point be $350 or
higher. All the Hoecker questions are answered -- I was fine with it. And
Dan has a section at the end describing CA as Regulatory Luddites -- I LOVED
it!
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 11/21/2000 10:26 AM -----
Susan J Mara
11/21/2000 10:24 AM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: My Additions
This looks really good -- I LOVED the Luddite Section!!!
I took out a lot of the PX wonderfulness -- the PX can say that stuff in its
own comments and we have no independent way to verify what they say.
Also, I made a lot of changes to clarify or add thoughts. Make sure the
color graphics look OK in black and white.
My only disappiontment -- was no talk about the retail market or how CA
regulators should focus on that -- I added the thought in one spot.
Because it is so long -- but still good-- I think a table of contents would
really help-- so people see what is there and can flip to the relevant
sections -- it also gets our full message across simply by looking at the
headings.
=====================================
|
1,659 |
Subject: Re: SCE Plans to Implement billing and balancing account aspects of
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/12358.
=====================================
Sue,
I thought there was a extra rate component for SCE undercollection that the
MOU would add.
If so, that extra rate should not be allowed to go forward until (a) the
legislation passes the MOU; and (b) the CPUC agrees how to levy it.
does anyone have clarity on this rate adder?
Thanks,
Tamara.
Susan J Mara@ENRON
05/11/2001 12:28 PM
To: Tamara Johnson/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert
Neustaedter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, [email protected], Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron,
Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: SCE Plans to Implement billing and balancing account aspects of MOU
as of June 3
I learned at the AReM meeting today:
SCE has informed ESPs that it will implement its advice letter on the MOU
(don't recall the number) beginning with the new rates on June 3. We are
planning to protest that AL. Do we care? IF we do, Jeanne, can we stop them?
Also, SCE has informed people that it is calculating the PX Charge/Credit
based on its AL that was rejected by the CPUC. Do we care on that one?
Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
=====================================
|
1,660 |
Subject: CA Power Issues
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ["nicholas.o'[email protected]", '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/1172.
=====================================
- California Gov. Gray Davis on Wednesday signed emergency legislation to cut
electricity rates in San Diego where a tripling in customers' bills this
summer has sparked a public outcry.
Enron Corp. (ENE) executives Wednesday called for swift federal action to
reform the U.S. wholesale power market and avert chronic power-supply
problems nationally, such as the high-profile woes that plagued the
California electricity market this summer.
California Utilities Reap Huge Profits Amid Record-High Energy Bills
In the seemingly long-ago 1990s, when California had electrons to spare and
energy was the last issue on most people's minds, San Diego Gas & Electric
tried to expand a 700-megawatt power plant in Chula Vista--and met with stony
indifference from local government types.
The attitude bespoke the not-in-my-backyard opposition that such projects
typically have faced around the state. SDG&E shelved the plan.
But the current is flowing the other way now: The state is in the midst of an
electricity crisis, and the San Diego bedroom community is urging the plant's
new operator not just to keep the facility running but, indeed, to make it
bigger.
=====================================
|
1,661 |
Subject: California gas intrastate matters - July 11 conference call
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/653.
=====================================
REMINDER
Here is the information for today's conference call.
Wednesday, July 11
1:00 to 2:00 p.m. Central Time
dial-in number: 800-486-2460
participant code: 675-923
host code (Lawner): 263-406
Leslie, if you need assistance during the call, please press "# 0".
From: Leslie Lawner@ENRON on 07/06/2001 09:32 AM
To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Stephanie Miller/Enron@EnronXGate, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Roger O Ponce/HOU/EES@EES, Mark Courtney/HOU/EES@EES, Greg Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Marianne Castano/HOU/EES@EES, Donald M Black/Enron@EnronXGate, Phillip K Allen/Enron@EnronXGate
cc: Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/Enron@EnronXGate, Rubena Buerger/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: California gas intrastate matters
There will be a conference call Wed. at 1:00 pm Central, July 11, to discuss California intrastate gas issues. Rubena Buerger will send out the call in information.
Items to be addressed are: LDC hedging, unbundling rates and infrastructure needs. Jeff Dasovich will give us a status report on these issues and we then discuss where to go from there.
=====================================
|
1,662 |
Subject: Bob Hillman in California
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/27732.
=====================================
Dear Everyone,
?
I, Bob Hillman, will be playing three dates in California in June.? Consider
yourselves warned!? I will be accompanied by Billy Masters, an electric
guitar player from New York.
?
Please take special note of the third concert, a house concert in Marin
County.? For those of you who have never attended a house concert, or even
heard of the concept, it actually takes place in someone's home.? In this
case, it's the home of my friend and fellow songwriter Christopher Smith,
best known for his classic song, "Dead Horse Trampoline."? I encourage you
Northern California types to consider attending this event, as it promises
to be a good time and a new experience.? Contact Christopher at
[email protected] for reservations and directions.?
Also, feel free to check out the recently expanded www.bobhillman.net for
tour dates and other information.? See you in June!
Wednesday, 27 June
Los Angeles, CA
Genghis Cohen
740 N. Fairfax Ave.
8:30pmsharp
?
Thursday, 28 June
San Francisco, CA
Voodoo Lounge
2937 Mission St. (@ Cesar Chavez)
8pm sharp
?
Friday, 29 June
San Anselmo, CA
Marin House Concerts
7:30pm
Contact: [email protected]
?
=====================================
|
1,663 |
Subject: Delete if you are not an International Student - J1 Visa holders
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/4219.
=====================================
WORKSHOP ABOUT THE TWO-YEAR HOME
COUNTRY PHYSICAL PRESENCE REQUIREMENT
Monday, December 11, 2000
Home Room of International House
3:00 - 5:00 p.m.
The two year home country physical presence requirement is defined by section
212(e) of the Immigration and Naturalization Act. (INA). J-1 visitors
subject to section 212 (e) must return to their country of last legal
residence for two years or obtain a waiver of this requirement before they are
eligible for the H-1B (temporary employment), L-1 (intracompany transfer) or
Permanent Residence (Green Card) categories.
No fee or pre-registration required.
Who should come?
For any UC Berkeley J-1 student or scholar
What will be covered?
Information about what makes a J-1 subject
Information about applying for a waiver of the two-year
requirement
Information about the timing of the application of a waiver
What should you bring?
All copies of the IAP-66
Passport
===============================
Sebastian Teunissen
Director of International Affairs
Haas School of Business
University of California, Berkeley
Berkeley, California 94720-1900 USA
Tel: (510) 643-4999
Fax: (510) 642-8228
http://www.haas.berkeley.edu/HaasGlobal
=====================================
|
1,664 |
Subject: RE: UC/CSU Customer Complaint -- Quail Ridge Research Station
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/2109.
=====================================
Well, we had the right person handling the call, that's for sure.
Best,
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Steffes, James D.
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 5:09 PM
To: Riley, Tom; Smith, Mike; Hughes, Evan
Cc: Mara, Susan; Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: UC/CSU Customer Complaint -- Quail Ridge Research Station
Tom --
I received a call today from the CPUC (came through the main Enron number) - a CPUC staffer named Joyce at 415-703-2199 (no one was interested in giving the last names).
Someone named Dan at the Quail Ridge Research Station (7001 Hwy 128 Napa, CA 94558) called the CPUC to complain that he was inappropriately switched from PG&E to Enron. It's a strange situation - the Universities own the bldg and land but a Trust pays the bills. He says that "the facility isn't anywhere near the campus."
The PG&E account number is ZNL8242005. His phone number is 503-752-0873.
I told him that we would look into this and get back by end of business Thursday.
The CPUC staffer is Joyce at 415-703-2199 (no one was interested in giving the last names).
My guess is that UC/CSU listed this account on a switch request but didn't ask Dan. What should we do??
Jim
=====================================
|
1,665 |
Subject: CHANGES TO CEA PHONE SYSTEM
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/41.
=====================================
I just wanted to let you know that starting on September 5th, CEA's phones
will be answered by an automatic system. This is being done so that we can
free up Carin to focus more on office management and client services. As a
result, when you dial the CEA number (415-421-4213) you will hear a recorded
message asking you to enter the three digit extension of the person you are
trying to reach. If you do not know the extension, you can select an option
that puts you into the company directory. If you know the extension, you
can enter the three digits as soon as you hear the voice from the automated
system (i.e., you don't have to wait). For your information, here are the
three digit extensions for everyone at CEA:
Carin D'Oliva - 101
Kirk Marckwald - 102
Peter Okurowski - 103
Darcy Whaley - 104
Andreas Merkl - 105
Tisha Mercado - 107
Darcy Wheeles - 109
John Claussen - 110
Jill Kaufman Johnson - 113
Lauren Johnson - 114
Peter Okurowski
Senior Associate
California Environmental Associates
423 Washington Street, Third Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Tel (415) 421-4213 x103
Fax (415) 982-7989
Cell (415) 999-0418
http://www.ceaconsulting.com
[email protected]
=====================================
|
1,666 |
Subject: Valentines Gifts from wine.com
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/5654.
=====================================
Card? "Ah."
Flowers? "Mmm."
Valentine from wine.com:
"OH, YES!"
There are valentines that express the fond sentiment of the occasion,
and there are valentines that get to the heart of the matter. At
wine.com, we've found that the latter are the ones that you put in
your mouth.
Wine Lovers features our most romantic wines, arranged in
provocative combinations. Sweets for your Sweetie showcases a
selection of seductive desserts, with wine and without. Extra-Special
Valentine Gifts are our most lavish and imaginative packages, which
pull out all the stops in their pursuit of romance.
To view any of the items below, simply click on the image. Any and
all alluring arrangements can be made at Amour Central: the wine.com
Valentine's Day Shop.
_____________________________________________________________________
French Kiss, $25
Cupids Quiver, $64
Romantic Duet, $35
Champagne & Truffles, $49
Confections M. Recchuitti, $18
Void where prohibited by law. Supplies are limited.
_____________________________________________________________________
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS NEWSLETTER, go to:
http://wine1.m0.net/m/u/vin/vv.asp?e=jdasovic%40enron.com
=====================================
|
1,667 |
Subject: Revised Table for Western Wholesale Activities - Gas & Power Conf.
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/11017.
=====================================
Revised to add gas cases.
---------------------- Forwarded by Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT on 04/12/2001
02:01 PM ---------------------------
From: Leslie Lawner@ENRON on 04/12/2001 09:08 AM
To: Ray Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON, Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Western Wholesale Activities - Gas & Power Conf. Call
I notice that there are no gas cases on this list. Do you want to add them?
We have the San Diego complaint, the LADWP complaint, and can also add the
filings for increased pipeline capacity into CA.
Ray Alvarez
04/11/2001 04:29 PM
To: Marcia A Linton/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Steve Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Alan
Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Rebecca W
Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: Western Wholesale Activities - Gas & Power Conf. Call
Attached is a table of on-going FERC issues and proceedings provided to me by
Sue Mara, which I have updated for use at tomorrow's conference call. Please
feel free to revise/add to/ re-publish this table as appropriate.
=====================================
|
1,668 |
Subject: FW: Turning California Around
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/1695.
=====================================
CA Manufacturers and Technology Association (CMTA) has continuing customer choice as a key proposal for the state.
-----Original Message-----
From: Geri L. Royer [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 12:44 PM
To: undisclosed-recipients
Subject: Turning California Around
To: CMTA Members
From: Gino DiCaro
Communications Director, CMTA
Date: November 15, 2001
Re: Letter to Governor Davis asking him to consider CMTA's proposals
CMTA released at both the Governor's Economic Summit and an Assembly
informational hearing last week its three proposals that will empower
manufacturers to grow and create new jobs.
Please go to: <http://www.cmta.net/turning_california_around/index.shtml>
to see the proposals and download a sample letter to send to Governor
Gray Davis and your local legislator, asking them to seriously consider
these investments in California that will keep and grow jobs and produce
more revenue for the state. Also fax us a copy of your letter at 916-447-9401
or e-mail at [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>.
We need as many letters as possible, so please pass along.
Thank You.
=====================================
|
1,669 |
Subject: Final exam
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/mba__macroeconomics/20.
=====================================
Dear class,
1. Popular acclimation has requested that we move macro the exam to Thursday
12/16. If you are one of the 3 people who prefered Wednesday, please contact
me
and we will arrange an opportunity for you to take the exam Wednesday.
BA201B Thursday, 12/16 6-9:30 in C210 & C220
For your information, the exam for BA202A will be Monday, 12/13 6-9:30 in C135
& C220,
Bhash and I have already ordered pizza and beer for the grading festivities on
Friday 12/17. (Actually, cappucinno's, but I thought you'd appreciate the
imagery of cheerful--albeit inaccurate--graders more.)
2. Also, classmates have suggested a number of web sites, and links have been
added to the class site. Be sure to understand the environmental and labor
rights critiques of the WTO. We do not have time to discuss them in class,
and
most business press presents largely the advantages of free trade.
See you soon,
- David
David I. Levine Associate professor
Haas School of Business ph: 510/642-1697
University of California fax: 510/643-1420
Berkeley CA 94720-1900 email:
[email protected]
http://web.haas.berkeley.edu/www/levine/
=====================================
|
1,670 |
Subject: Internet Low Income and Universal Access Program
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/375.
=====================================
SB 1626: Author Hayden -- Introduced 2/22/00
Author Sponsored
Summary:
This bill would, for each taxable year beginning on or after January 1, 2000,
and before January 1, 2005, allow a one-time refundable personal income tax
credit, not to exceed $500, in an amount equal to 80% of the cost paid or
incurred for obtaining a personal computer, printer, and access to the
Internet, as provided.
This bill would require the commission to establish a class of lifeline
Internet access service necessary to meet minimum residential Internet needs,
set rates for that service, develop eligibility criteria, assess the degree
of achievement of universal Internet access.
The furnishing of lifeline Internet access service is in the public interest
and should be supported fairly and equitably by every Internet Service
Provider, and the commission in administering the lifeline Internet access
service program, should implement the program in an equitable,
nondiscriminatory, and competitively neutral manner for the Internet Service
Provider industry.
Position
I assume we want to monitor this bill. Do you need any more immediate
information?
Attached is a copy of the bill
=====================================
|
1,671 |
Subject: California Energy Crisis Timeline
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/4440.
=====================================
FYI.
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 05/04/2001 04:25 PM -----
"Costigan, Richard" <[email protected]>
05/03/2001 05:50 PM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: California Energy Crisis Timeline
<<Energy Crisis Timeline.doc>>
Good afternoon:
You have been added to an e-mail distribution list form Assembly Republican
Leader Dave Cox's office. This timeline is one of many documents produced
by the Assembly Republican Caucus. Daily documents include daily agendas
and a daily energy briefing document. I will forward today's copies to you.
If you have any questions as a result of your meeting with Mr. John
Campbell, please do not hesitate to wither contact Mr. Campbell or Mr. Cox,
or this office. On behalf of Mr.. Cox, please accept his apologies for
having to reschedule the meeting due to session.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Thank you,
Richard
Richard Costigan, III
Chief of Staff
Office of the Assembly Republican Leader
California State Assembly
Phone:(916) 319-2005
- Energy Crisis Timeline.doc
=====================================
|
1,672 |
Subject: Re: California Enery Alliance
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/13378.
=====================================
Let's talk. Some other things have come up.
Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
Janel Guerrero
06/05/2001 07:20 AM
To: Paul Kaufman/Enron@EnronXGate, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT, Mary
Schoen/NA/Enron@Enron, [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected]
cc: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: California Enery Alliance
Everyone,
A few months ago Enron was contacted by the firm Barnes Mosher Whitehurst
Lauter & Partners. Enron was asked to join a new coalition called the
California Energy Alliance. The purpose of CEA is to identify opinion
leaders, union members and registered voters who can be mobilized in support
of streamlining California's process for building power plants.
Both Paul and I have had conversations with the partners at BMWL. Today, I
left a message for one of the partners that Enron will not be participating
in the coalition and wished them well in their efforts. I wanted you all to
be aware of the telephone call and understand that Enron would not be
involved in the coalition's efforts.
=====================================
|
1,673 |
Subject: RE: Prehearing conference Statement -- November 7, 2001
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['MDay', '[email protected]', "jbennett'@enron.com"]
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/2167.
=====================================
Thanks, Jeanne.
Just to be clear (since we had a bit of a different take last Friday in the meeting that Jim and Sue and I had with Mike). Mike's take was that we'd be addressing just about everything under the sun, including why we think that hearings are necessary. This takes a much narrower approach. Just want to make sure that we're all on the same page. I understand that Mike was travelling yesterday and the first part of today. Likely makes sense to have a call this PM to make sure out ducks are all in a line. Thanks again.
Best,
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: JBennett [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 10:19 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich (E-mail); Sue Mara (E-mail)
Cc: MDay
Subject: Prehearing conference Statement -- November 7, 2001
Sue and Jeff --
After reviewing ALJ Barnett's Ruling again, it appears that the PHC
statements are restricted to which of the four areas he as identified for
discussion should go to hearing and why. Attached is an outline of what we
are thinking of putting in for Enron. Please circulate to any one you think
needs to see it at Enron and provide input as soon as you can.
<<X29077.DOC>>
Jeanne
=====================================
|
1,674 |
Subject: Re: California
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/1885.
=====================================
Hi Scott:
Thanks for the note. Hope things are well. I'd like to call the El Paso
person if that works for you. Yep, moratorium's still in place (at least to
build your own---you can always get someone who previously received authority
to do it for you). I'll keep you posted.
Best,
Jeff
[email protected]
09/28/2000 11:17 AM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: California
If you are still trying to pull utilities and such together to approach the
California regulatory bodies, El Paso would be interested in joining the
effort.
I work with Bryan Neskora and Bruce Northcutt with El Paso Global Networks.
El
Paso is trying to install fiber along their pipeline ROW starting in Los
Angeles
through Phoenix, Tucson, El Paso, Houston. I believe they are having
difficulties on the regulatory side. Bryan gave me the following name in the
regulatory group:
Kim Corley
713-420-5610
Houston
Bryan said to feel free to give her a call. Hope this helps.
I also understand we still haven't received permitting build. Is moratorium
still in place?
Scott Pleus
Enron Broadband Services
[email protected]
713-853-6577 Office
281-300-8286 Wireless
=====================================
|
1,675 |
Subject: FW: Today's FERC Filing for WPTF
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', 'Michelle Dangott', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/1639.
=====================================
-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Douglass [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 12:35 PM
To: Gary Ackerman; Mara, Susan; Greg Blue; Karen Shea; Curtis Kebler; Jack Pigott; Bill Ross; Todd Torgerson; Curt Hatton; Steve Huhman; Roger Pelote; Bob Anderson; Max Bulk; Janie Mollon; Marcie Milner; [email protected]
Cc: Michelle Dangott
Subject: Today's FERC Filing for WPTF
Attached is a copy of today's FERC filing that advocates adoption of a circuit breaker price for the coming winter, as opposed to the existing price cap mechanism. As you know, we usually circulate these filings in draft form so that funders can see and provide comments in advance. I was under the mistaken impression that this filing was only to be reviewed by Gary Ackerman, so he was the only recipient of the earlier drafts and the attached copy bears all of his input and suggestions. My apologies for not circulating it more broadly, as we normally do.
Dan
Law Offices of Daniel W. Douglass
5959 Topanga Canyon Blvd. Suite 244
Woodland Hills, CA 91367
Tel: (818) 596-2201
Fax: (818) 346-6502
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
=====================================
|
1,676 |
Subject: Re: Staff Meeting Reminder & Agenda Items Request
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/814.
=====================================
Apologies. I'm in S.D. with Calger and Dyer to meet w/Sempra tomorrow
morning.
Joseph Alamo
11/01/2000 05:12 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@Enron, Marcie
Milner/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT@ECT
Subject: Staff Meeting Reminder & Agenda Items Request
Second Request and "Last Call" for Agenda Items for tomorrow's Staff
call/meeting!
Thanks,
Joseph
---------------------- Forwarded by Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron on 11/01/2000 03:10
PM ---------------------------
Joseph Alamo
10/30/2000 12:55 PM
To: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Mona L
Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Marcie Milner/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT@ECT
Subject: Staff Meeting Reminder & Agenda Items Request
Please consider this a request for your agenda items, if any, for the next
Staff Meeting, currently scheduled for this Thursday, November 2nd at 8:30
a.m. PST.
Please forward to me by 5:00 p.m. PST, Wednesday, November 1st.
Thanks in advance for your assistance.
Joseph Alamo
Sr. Administrative Assistant
Government Affairs - The Americas
San Francisco CA
=====================================
|
1,677 |
Subject: CADER's DG Conference in San diego.
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/446.
=====================================
Hi, I wanted to let you know that the CADER's DG conference on November 1-2, 2001 in San Diego, will be held as scheduled. Please disregard this message if you have already registered for the conference. If not, I have some good news. I am aware of the difficulties in planning your trip and hence, we have extended the early-bird registration until October 15th for your convenience. However, the group rate at the Hotel will expire on October 8th. So please hurry and make your reservation for the Hotel room.
The revised program is posted on the www.cader.org . Sponsorship has been very good and we have just a couple of exhibit spots left if you are still interested. Also, the attendance is picking up well. We are now already up to 200 attendees. So please hurry and get your registration in at the earliest opportune time. Frankly, your early registration will help me immensely in planning and coordinating the conference.
Join us for 2 days of comprehensive discussions, questions and answers - your input is essential for a successful DG market.
Thanks, and do not hesitate to call me if you have any questions.
Jairam.
Jairam Gopal
Tel:(916) 654-4880
Fax:(916) 654-4685
=====================================
|
1,678 |
Subject: RE: ICSC conference
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/811.
=====================================
The pleasure was all mine. You did a fantastic job with the presentation (both developing and presenting it). Likewise, it lifted my spirits in these challenging times to meet someone as talented (and fun!) as you. Hope our paths cross again often. Never hesitate to get in touch if there's anything I can do.
Best,
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Malone, Laurie
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 8:30 AM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Cc: Schwarz, Angela; Schwartz, Laura; Glasin, Shirleen; Mahoney, Peggy
Subject: RE: ICSC conference
Jeff: Thanks again for joining for the conference. I was actually very busy with folks there through the breakfast meeting Saturday am (had one particularly hostile attendee to that) and then on through Saturday afternoon- questions, questions, questions so I would say our attendance was definitely worthwhile. Your insight and provacative discussion provided an excellent framework for the business case we were trying to communicate. If I can ever be of any assistance to you, please feel free to call me. When I meet folks like you, it just reinforces my commitment to the great people we work with and the great company we work for. Thanks, Laurie
=====================================
|
1,679 |
Subject: RE: today
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/2246.
=====================================
No problem. Man, for someone who doesn't know much, you sure know alot, based on the note you sent. It's your call on today's lesson. If you're feeling under the weather, then we can pass for today. Otherwise, I'll show up at 4:30. Just let me know. And you can decide anytime between now and 3:30. I don't know how much Eldon and Rory can help, but they're both real knowledgeable and generally love thinking about this kind of stuff.
Best,
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Avram Siegel [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 11:35 AM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: today
Hi Jeff - Here's the deal, I've had a cold for a few days. I'm probably past the contagious stage but this is not an exact science. I'm up for teaching today but I figure it's fair to let people know in case they're concerned. I'll see you at 4:30 unless I hear from you in which case I'll understand. Hey, thanks for facilitating this little DAW discussion group. I think I understand the procedure now. I had to hunt around a little for the "reply to all" command(not on my tool bar), but I found it. Now I'm ready. I'm still learning about a lot of this stuff. Later - Avram
=====================================
|
1,680 |
Subject: RE: Hedging Opportunities
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/467.
=====================================
Jeff--I am assuming this would be of interest to the gas guys....are you going to call Tycholiz on this? Let me know if you don't have time and I'll give him a buzz
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 5:31 PM
To: Neustaedter, Robert; Landwehr, Susan M.; Kaufman, Paul; Kingerski, Harry
Subject: RE: Hedging Opportunities
Thank you Robert for pointing that out. I think there is/will be an opportunity--if we can ever get paid, and if we can ever comfortable from a credit standpoint--and my apologies for not having flagged that sooner. Too many balls.........in the air.
Best,
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Neustaedter, Robert
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 5:21 PM
To: Landwehr, Susan M.; Kaufman, Paul; Dasovich, Jeff; Kingerski, Harry
Subject: Hedging Opportunities
Article 2, Section 2.4 of the recent Settlement Agreement between SCE and CPUC states that SCE intends to apply to the CPUC for approval to incur up to $250 million (recoverable in a tracking account) to acquire financial instruments intended to hedge fuel cost risks associated with its URG and QF contracts. Any commercial opportunities there?
=====================================
|
1,681 |
Subject: Re: Conference Call -- January 16th
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/8311.
=====================================
Harry:
Tamara Johnson left me a voicemail stating that 1) she phoned Bob
Weisenmiller requesting that he be our witness 2) there was disagreement
internally about whether Enron should have testimony 3) she nonetheless
wanted to try to make sure Bob was available and 4) she would call Bob back
to discuss further on Tuesday. Not sure that this is the best way to run a
railroad. As you mentioned, it's quite inefficient to have EES folks
contacting our lawyers and reg consultants directly. I did not respond to
Tamara's message--thought it would be better to pass along info to you. We
can discuss further on Tuesday.
Best,
Jeff
JMB <[email protected]>
01/12/2001 04:33 PM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc: MBD <[email protected]>
Subject: Conference Call -- January 16th
I have set up a conference call for Tuesday, January 16th at 10:00 a.m. PST
to get our game plan together for testimony in the CPUC proceeding.
Dial in number is 800-403-2036
Participant Code is 298206
Jeanne Bennett
=====================================
|
1,682 |
Subject: Re: CPUC
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/4825.
=====================================
Lee:
Check the PUC website for information---it sounds like the PUC's inquiry into
the adequacy of SoCal's insfrastructure, i.e., in state transportation.
Should be a lot about it on their website (www.cpuc.ca.gov). If you come up
empty, leave me a voicemail (415.782.7822) and I'll track things down.
Best,
Jeff
Lee Huber
06/06/2001 11:11 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: CPUC
All I know is as follows On March 27,2001 the Commission issued a scoping
memo in 00-11-002. The scoping memo added the issue of the adequacy of
SoCal's transmission system to the issues to be addressed in this proceeding.
An ALJ ruling dated April 26,2001, provided that the adequacy of SoCal's gas
transmission system and the effect on its customers be bifurcated from the
other issues in this proceeding. The ALJ's ruling provided that any party
filing testimony on March 23,2001 would be allowed to file supplemental
testimony on the SoCal capacity issue.
SoCal filed supplemental testimony.
We are not a party. We need to know if it is too late to become a party, if
we wanted to. Also was any other supplemental testimony filed by other
parties??
=====================================
|
1,683 |
Subject: Re: Lost Demand
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/363.
=====================================
Agreed. Also, Margaret, do we have numbers on what portion of GDP and
California's "GDP" the tech sector represents?
Best,
Jeff
Rob Bradley
09/24/2000 11:51 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Margaret Carson/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: Lost Demand
I think it will be extra important to add "lost demand" from brownouts and
blackouts to consumption to get the real growth rate of power demand this
year. There was an increment of this for 1999 given the problems in New York
City and Chicago and maybe elsewhere.
- Rob
Robert L. Bradley Jr.
Director, Public Policy Analysis
Enron Corp.
P.O Box 1188, Room 4724a
[1400 Smith Street 77002]
Houston, Texas 77251-1188
(P) 713-853-3062
(F) 713-646-4702
Assistant: Joan Stransky 713-853-4702
[email protected]
Jeff Dasovich
09/22/2000 06:24 PM
To: Simon Shih/Graphics/Enron@ENRON
cc: Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES@ENRON, Margaret Carson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rob
Bradley/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re:
Thank you very much for the tech data. Margaret, is there data out there
regarding the California utilities performance (i.e., how many rolling
blackouts, etc. v. national average)? Thanks again.
=====================================
|
1,684 |
Subject: Christmas Party Plans
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/2570.
=====================================
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 10/20/2000 03:35 PM -----
Cristina Zavala@ECT
10/20/2000 03:28 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT, David
Kates/SF/ECT@ECT, Michael McDonald/SF/ECT@ECT, Rob Bakondy/SF/ECT@ECT, Ron
Coker/Corp/Enron@Enron, Laird Dyer/SF/ECT@ECT, Mona L
Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, Vicky Ha/SF/ECT@ECT, Ryan Deane/SF/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Wehn/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT, Mark Fillinger/SF/ECT@ECT, Dean
Russell/SF/ECT@ECT, Peter Bray/TNPC/EES@EES, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@Enron,
Sandra McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES, Edith Turnipseed/SF/ECT@ECT, Michael
Wong/SF/ECT@ECT, Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES, Michael Danielson/SF/ECT@ECT
cc: Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron@Enron, April Hrach/SF/ECT@ECT
Subject: Christmas Party Plans
Hello guys!
Just to keep you up to date on the Christmas Party Plans that we are working
on. (Mark your calendars - Invitation to follow)
DATE: December 15th, 2000
DINNER: MORTON'S OF CHICAGO TIME: 5:15 p.m.
400 Post St.
San Francisco, CA
AFTER DINNER EVENT: STOMP TIME: 8:00 p.m.
Marines Theather
609 Sutter St.
San Francisco, CA
Total headcount to date is: 50
Cristina
=====================================
|
1,685 |
Subject: Picks of the Week--Week 3 Final and Week4 Pick Sheet
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['e-mail <[email protected]', 'e-mail <[email protected]', 'e-mail <[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/314.
=====================================
Here are the results of the third week. Barrie is the first place
winner--due no doubt to the fact that her daughter lives in Ohio--so Barrie
picked both Cincinnati AND Cleveland to win. Second place goes to Andy, and
Cary and Eldon tied for 3rd.
Two more players sat down when Minnesota lost, so Nancy and the Deitrick's
are out of the Last Person Standing pool.
And here's an explanation of the different worksheets in the file:
Week #3. There will always be a worksheet with the results for the week,
It also shows ranking and total points. It is sorted by the total points
for the current week.
YTD Standings. This worksheet shows the cumulative points and ranking. It
is sorted by total points.
LPS. Status of Last Person Standing pool. An "x" above a name indicates
that that person is no longer standing. Also, you can see which teams you
have picked in the past.
PAYOUT. Shows the money winners each week and the cumulative total. Sorted
by dollars won.
There may be other weeks still showing, but Nancy drops them off as the
season progresses so the file does not get too big. Please call if you have
any question about this or you spot an error somewhere.
=====================================
|
1,686 |
Subject: PGE proposal to secure gas suppliers
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/5407.
=====================================
FYI.
Jim
----- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 02/07/2001 07:20 PM -----
Michael Tribolet
02/07/2001 07:19 PM
To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: PGE proposal to secure gas suppliers
FYI: Low initial success rate.
----- Forwarded by Michael Tribolet/Corp/Enron on 02/07/2001 06:58 PM -----
Travis McCullough@ECT
02/07/2001 04:07 PM
To: Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark E
Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
Tribolet/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: PGE proposal to secure gas suppliers
FYI -- Five of PGE's 25 suppliers agreed to execute the PG&E's proposed
security agreement, including two Dynegy entities. Two entities (a Goldman,
Sachs affiliate and Western Gas Resources) shut off gas supplies immediately
upon termination of the DOE order. PGE indicated a need to continue to
negotiating with other suppliers for additional gas suppliers, so they may
come around.
Travis McCullough
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street EB 3817
Houston Texas 77002
Phone: (713) 853-1575
Fax: (713) 646-3490
=====================================
|
1,687 |
Subject: Re: Sierra Pacific
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/11547.
=====================================
Dan,
yes, please forward summaries for Sierra Pacific - they are much
appreciated. I am not interested in the gas side. But, as with Socal Gas,
do whatever works for you administratively.
Also, could you please put Gordon Savage back on your distribution list?
([email protected]) I will be transitioning out of California. But please
keep me in the loop until I let you know when I move onto a different region.
Thanks,
Tamara Johnson.
"Dan Douglass" <[email protected]> on 07/30/2001 10:29:47 PM
To: "Robert Neustaedter" <[email protected]>, "Sue Mara"
<[email protected]>, "Tamara Johnson" <[email protected]>, "Jeff
Dasovich" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Sierra Pacific
Here is a new one....an AL from Sierra Pacific.? Does Enron want to have
these reviewed?? Also, I will be sending you a summary this evening of two
advice letters from Southwest Gas....same question applies....do you want
summaries of its filings?
?
Dan
Law Offices of Daniel W. Douglass
5959 Topanga Canyon Blvd.? Suite 244
Woodland Hills, CA 91367
Tel:?? (818) 596-2201
Fax:? (818) 346-6502
[email protected]
- 7-30-01 AL Summary Chart.doc
=====================================
|
1,688 |
Subject: Enron California Template
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/2298.
=====================================
Could be me, but that doesn't look like your email address. You get this
email from Jeremy (good guy who works with Steve)?
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 10/11/2000 05:01 PM -----
Jeremy Meier <[email protected]>
10/11/2000 03:54 PM
To: [email protected]
cc: [email protected]
Subject: Enron California Template
Sue:
To follow up from yesterdays' call with us, we are going to revise the
California ETI tariff(s) to parallel your national Enron template. We are
also looking at Pacific Bell's Tariff CAL. PUC No. 175T to determine their
current Dedicated Transport service tariffed rates, and will advise.
We have a PDF version of the Master Sales Agreement, and are incorporating
some minor revisions - and maintaining the Contract as governing over the
tariff. I believe we also needed input from Enron Broadband Sales on the
California customer Forms for filing with the updated tariffs.
If you could pass along the template so we can change the services, that
would be greatly appreciated. Please let us know any questions,
Jeremy Meier
Blumenfeld & Cohen
4 Embarcadero Center, Suite 1170
San Francisco, CA 94111
415 394-7500
=====================================
|
1,689 |
Subject: Re: PG&E Advice 2056-E
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/2034.
=====================================
I will review the filing. The part about "consensus positions" concerns me=
.
From: Marcie Milner on 11/29/2000 11:06 AM MST
To: Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES, Robert Frank/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: [email protected], Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff=20
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul=20
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT=20
Subject: PG&E Advice 2056-E
The purpose of this filing is to provide PG&E=01,s version of the distribut=
ed=20
generation interconnection tariff. In D.00-11-001, the Commission ordered=
=20
California utilities to file advice letters by November 17, 2000, adopting=
=20
the CEC=01,s model rule (with certain changes as discussed in D. 00-11-001)=
and=20
to incorporate any consensus positions from the CEC=01,s supplemental=20
recommendation. PG&E says it has worked with Edison and SDG&E to ensure th=
at=20
any changes to the recommended model rule of June 27, 2000, incorporate th=
e=20
October 25 supplemental recommendations and that the recommendations are=20
implemented in a uniform fashion by the utilities. Protests are due=20
12/7/00. Please advise if you need further information or if this is of=20
interest.
=====================================
|
1,690 |
Subject: Re: Gov. Davis' Dec 1 Plan
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/3506.
=====================================
I'll take a wild guess about what will be in the plan.
1. Marshall Law
2. Nationalize the grid.
3. International energy crimes trial.
Mona L Petrochko
11/15/2000 07:42 PM
To: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
[email protected]
Subject: Re: Gov. Davis' Dec 1 Plan
No rumors from the AB 1890 group either. Seems like the plan is being
developed by a select few and very close to the vest.
Susan J Mara
11/15/2000 06:01 PM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Mona L
Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Gov. Davis' Dec 1 Plan
The Governor obviously picked Dec 1 so they could review everyone's filings
from the 22nd. I've asked our lobbying firm -- governmental Advocates -- to
see what they can find out about the plan. I haven't even heard any rumors.
=====================================
|
1,691 |
Subject: FW: SEC Inquiry
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/1452.
=====================================
Please see the e:mail below from our Public Relations department.
-----Original Message-----
From: Denne, Karen
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 7:19 PM
To: Meyer, Vance; Philipp, Meredith; Mansfield, Shelly; Thode, Eric; Ambler, John; Mahoney, Peggy; Patrick, Christie; Vegas, Dennis; Taylor, Gina; Kimberly, Kelly; Mandelker, Jeannie; Clark, Mary; Palmer, Sarah
Cc: Palmer, Mark A. (PR); Shapiro, Richard; Kean, Steven J.
Subject: SEC Inquiry
Importance: High
As you know, the SEC is conducting an informal inquiry into related party transactions Enron did with LJM. We are cooperating fully and are providing the information the SEC has requested. However, we have learned today that the SEC is extremely sensitive about us using their inquiry as a "shield" to not answer certain questions -- i.e. "I can't answer that because of a pending SEC inquiry." As a result, we have been advised that we should not make any comment about the SEC inquiry in any context. This extends beyond media and includes any interactions with customers, regulators, etc. Please forward this message on to anyone in your group who this might impact. Call me if you have any questions.
Thank you.
Karen
=====================================
|
1,692 |
Subject: AZ Superior Court Order
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/2127.
=====================================
On Monday, November 27, the Arizona Superior Court issued a judgment to CV
97-03748 (consolidated) TEP vs. ACC. The judgment is against the Arizona
Corporation Commission on all consolidated rules and CC&N complaints filed by
the coops and pertaining to all CC&N decisions insofar as the Commission's
Electric Competition Rules and Decisions enacted and issued pursuant to those
rules are invalid for failure to provide for the Commission ascertaining the
fair value of the property of public service corporations under Article 15&
14 of the Arizona Constitution and certain rules are invalid for lack of
Attorney General certification.
It was further ordered that the coops demonstrated as a matter of law that
the Commission's rules and CC&N decisions are unlawful and unconstitutional
under the Arizona Constitution. Commission Decisions 59942, 61071(Emergency
Rules), 61272 (Emergency Rules made permanent) and 61969 and all Electric
Competition Rules enacted under those decisions are vacated and set aside as
unlawful and unconstitutional. All competitive CC&N's and tariffs approved
under those decisions are also vacated and set aside as unlawful and
unconstitutional.
=====================================
|
1,693 |
Subject: Important Energy Hearings this week
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/4407.
=====================================
Following is the Press advisory from The House Government Reform Chair
regarding the hearings about energy this week April 10, 11 and 12 -
Sacramento,
San Jose and San Diego.
http://www.house.gov/ose/energyhearing.htm
http://www.house.gov/reform/press/_ma.01.04.06.htm
http://www.house.gov/reform/press/_ma.01.04.05.htm
WASHINGTON, D.C. --- The House Government Reform Committee will hold three
field hearings this week in California to look into the state's energy
crisis. The hearings, entitled "Assessing the California Crisis: How Did We
Get to This Point, and Where Do We Go From Here?" will take place on April
10 in Sacramento, April 11 in San Jose and April 12 in San Diego.
WEDNESDAY, April 11, 2001 9:30 a.m. PST
San Jose State University in Loma Prieta Ballroom
One Washington Square
Panel One
The Honorable Curt Hebert - Chairman, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Panel Two
Ms. Dede Hapner - Vice President, Regulatory Relations, Pacific Gas and
Electric Company
Mr. Robert G. Foster - Senior Vice President of External Affairs, Southern
California Edison
Dean N. Vanech - President, Delta Power Company
Mr. Paul E. Desrochers - Director of Fuel Procurement, Thermo Ecotek
=====================================
|
1,694 |
Subject: Weekend efforts to translate core/noncore proposal into legislative
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/890.
=====================================
Below is an update from the weekend's activities.
The group negotiating the core/noncore proposal met over the weekend to attempt to put the proposal into legislative language/format.
The product produced thus far is generally sloppy and ill-drafted and the individual facilitating the group is working tonite to integrate the comments provided and discussions that took place today. He will distribute a new draft by noon tomorrow (PDT).
The plan as it currently stands is to deliver a product to Hertzberg by COB tomorrow (Monday).
As expected, some in the group are attempting to "recontract" certain portions of the original deal, but those attempts are generally at the margin.
The DWR contracts remain a key impediment to any deal.
Senator Burton has still not definitively committed to a conference committee to produce a bill to deliver to Davis.
In addition, the legislation to create a dedicated rate component to service the bonds to repay the state budget for power purchased by DWR (and de-link the bonds from the DWR contracts) may be on a slower track than folks thought initially.
Will have more information tomorrow on where Burton and the bond legislation stand.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
1,695 |
Subject: SoCalGas Capacity Forum
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/5120.
=====================================
Drew, Jeff
I've been out of pocket a couple of days... sorry I didn't get back sooner.
Yes, TW did know about this meeting. We got a call from Lad at the beginning
of the week letting us know it was coming and asking us would we
participate. In fact, we've tentatively arranged a follow-on meeting on
Friday with SoCal to discuss TW-only issues.
-----Original Message-----
From: Fossum, Drew
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 1:57 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Cc: Fawcett, Jeffery; Scott, Susan
Subject: Re: FW: SoCalGas Capacity Forum
Thanks. My guess is that someone ought to go and represent TW. Fawcett and
Harris ought to make that call. Jeff D: I assume you know who Lad Lorenz
is. Either Jeff: does Lad's involvement signal anything to us--i.e., is he
their "get stuff done guy" or their "try to look like you are getting stuff
done guy" ? DF
From: Jeff Dasovich on 02/27/2001 07:51 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Jeffery Fawcett/Enron@EnronXGate, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron, Drew
Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: FW: SoCalGas Capacity Forum
You get this? Someone that I know forwarded it along to me. Know anything
about it?
Best,
Jeff
- Capacity Forum.doc
=====================================
|
1,696 |
Subject: Re: Vacation, Sweet Vacation
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/4277.
=====================================
Jeff, when you get the description, just go to the bottom of the page and hit
continue, then your election form will appear and when you get to the bottom
of that form, click accept and then you will be able to print your
confirmation statement. Also, if you prefer to print the form before
entering your information, you can do so from the bottom of the page.
Sometimes people, for whatever reason, can't see the whole screen, so they
can't see the buttons "I Accept" or "Continue" or "Print" and then they have
to go to the display settings if maximizing the screen doesn't help. Let me
know if none of this works for you or you can call me at 713-853-5878 and
I'll walk you through it.
Thanks.
Mary
From: Jeff Dasovich on 12/05/2000 10:10 AM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Mary Lessor/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Michelle Hargrave/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Vacation, Sweet Vacation
Hi Mary:
Well, the problem is likely just that I'm dense. I log in, click on deferral
and find a description of what one needs to do (i.e., fill out the form), but
I've surfed around the site a bit and can't seem to find the form. Am I
(probably) missing something? Thanks a bunch.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
1,697 |
Subject: Tauzin/Barton Meeting with Enron
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/5433.
=====================================
We just received a phone call from the House Energy and Commerce Committee
Republican staff inviting Enron to meet in California on February 21 with
Chairman Tauzin, Rep. Joe Barton, and other Republican committee members.
The Committee intends to hold three meetings, probably in Pasadena, of a fact
finding nature. The meetings will be CEO level and will not be official
hearings. Instead, the meetings will be more in the nature of a roundtable
session. The three groups being invited are: a)generators/marketers; b)
IOUs; and c) State and consumer groups. The Chairman is interested in
hearing about solutions, and less interested in "who's to blame." Other
participants in our group are: Dynegy, Southern, Reliant, Duke, Calpine, and
Williams. They intend to also include a few natural gas suppliers in our
group. Our session is expected to start at 10:00 a.m. Although they are
asking for CEO level participation, I expect we could substitute someone
under that rank. However, I would recommend we try to accommodate their
request for CEO attendance given the meeting with be with Chairman Tauzin.
Enron historically has not had close ties to the new Chairman.
=====================================
|
1,698 |
Subject: Alert- new email address for Avram Siegel, Allison Fisher and True
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/986.
=====================================
Dear Friends,
Since the Excite @home network went down on Saturday morning, all emailed c=
orrespondence directed to AvramSiegel @ home.com or AllisonFisher @home.com=
or TrueBluegrass @home.com has been lost, and will not be recovered. Plea=
se do not attempt to 'reply' to any previous emails sent from us individual=
ly or the True Blue bluegrass Band, because those emails now have an invali=
d reply address. If you have saved a previous email from True Blue, please =
delete it and save this one instead. The Excite network has been replaced =
with the AT&T network, and email addresses have changed from @home.com to A=
[email protected]. If you wish to get in touch with True Blue, you can =
"reply" to this email, or contact any of the bandmembers via our website at=
www.truebluegrass.com. There you may send safely send email to trueblue@t=
ruebluegrass.com. We are very sorry for the inconvenience. This abrupt ter=
mination of service has seriously jeopardized our bookings for the coming y=
ear, so we appreciate your help in making this correction. Thank you for y=
our understanding, and we hope to hear from you at our new address!
Regards,
Avram, Allison and True Blue
=====================================
|
1,699 |
Subject: Reminder: Haas Biotech Club Meeting Thurs
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/8760.
=====================================
There was a mistake in my email address in Mark Barrett's message:?? Please
note that my correct address is [email protected]
Hey evening MBA's,
If you are interested in learning about biotech or interested in getting
involved in the Haas Biotech Club, but cannot make it to the meeting
tomorrow, please contact Mark Barrett ([email protected]) or Sarita
Jain ([email protected]), and we will be sure to meet with you soon so
that you can get involved!
We look forward to hearing from you.
What: Haas Biotech Club Kickoff Meeting
When:Thursday, February 1, 12:30
Where: C325
Interested in learning more about technologies and trends in the biotech and
pharmaceutical industry?
Learn about consulting, marketing, business development, and banking
opportunities related to biotech.
Attend networking events with industry leaders, venture capitalists, and
entrepreneurs.
Please join us in discussing the following events:
Industry Speaker Series
Haas at Work-Genentech, Alza
Biotech Venture Capital Roundtable
Bay Area bioTank Networking Events
Biotech Firm Night
Please come and share your ideas.
Food and drinks will be provided.
=====================================
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.